natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 25a of Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004, the European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter ‘the Authority’, presented to the Commission its view on the draft review report for Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-docosatetraen-1-yl isobutyrate [6] on 18 December 2013.
V skladu s členom 25a Uredbe (ES) št. 2229/2004 je Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) 18. decembra 2013 Komisiji predložila svoje stališče o osnutku poročila o pregledu Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-dokozatetraen-1-il izobutirata [6].
The Authority communicated its view on Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-docosatetraen-1-yl isobutyrate to the notifier.
Agencija je svoje mnenje o Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-dokozatetraen-1-il izobutiratu sporočila tudi prijavitelju.
The Commission invited the notifier to submit its comments on the draft review report for Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-docosatetraen-1-yl isobutyrate.
Komisija je prijavitelja pozvala, naj predloži pripombe k osnutku poročila o pregledu Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-dokozatetraen-1-il izobutirata.
The draft review report and the view of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed and finalised on 12 December 2014 in the format of the Commission review report for Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-docosatetraen-1-yl isobutyrate.
Osnutek poročila o pregledu in mnenje Agencije so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo ter končno različico pripravile 12. decembra 2014 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-dokozatetraen-1-il izobutirata.
It is confirmed that the active substance Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-docosatetraen-1-yl isobutyrate is to be deemed to have been approved under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Potrjeno je, da se aktivna snov Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-dokozatetraen-1-il izobutirat šteje za registrirano v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009.
In accordance with Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 in conjunction with Article 6 thereof and in the light of current scientific and technical knowledge, it is necessary to amend the conditions of approval of Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-docosatetraen-1-yl isobutyrate.
V skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 v povezavi s členom 6 Uredbe ter ob upoštevanju sedanjih znanstvenih in tehničnih dognanj je treba spremeniti pogoje za registracijo Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-dokozatetraen-1-il izobutirata.
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-doco-satetraen-1-yl isobutyrate.
Sklep o strokovnem pregledu ocene tveganja za pesticide glede aktivne snovi Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-dokozatetraen-1-il izobutirat.
EFSA Journal 2014; 12(2):3525.
EFSA Journal (2014);12(2):3525.
Common Name, Identification Numbers
Čistost
Purity
Veljavnost registracije
Expiration of approval
Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-dokozatetraen-1-il izobutirat
Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19- docosatetraen-1-yl isobutyrate
CAS 135459-81-3
CAS No 135459-81-3
1. september 2009
1 September 2009
31. avgust 2019
31 August 2019
DEL A
PART A
Registrira se lahko samo kot atraktant.
Only uses as attractant may be authorised.
DEL B
PART B
Za izvajanje enotnih načel iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 se upoštevajo ugotovitve iz poročila o pregledu Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-dokozatetraen-1-il izobutirata (SANCO/2650/2008) in zlasti dodatka I in II h končni različici poročila, ki jo je pripravil Stalni odbor za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo.
For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19- docosatetraen-1-yl isobutyrate (SANCO/2650/2008) and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed shall be taken into account.
Pogoji uporabe po potrebi vključujejo ukrepe za zmanjšanje tveganja.
Conditions of use shall include, where appropriate, risk mitigation measures.
Prijavitelj predloži potrditvene informacije o:
The notifier shall submit confirmatory information as regards:
specifikaciji tehničnega materiala v tržni proizvodnji, vključno z informacijami o vseh relevantnih nečistočah;
the specification of the technical material, as commercially manufactured, including information on any relevant impurities;
oceni tveganja zaradi izpostavljenosti za izvajalce, delavce in druge navzoče;
exposure risk assessment for operators, workers and bystanders;
končnem stanju in obnašanju snovi v okolju;
environmental fate and behaviour of the substance;
oceni tveganja zaradi izpostavljenosti za neciljne organizme.
exposure risk assessment for non-target organisms.
Prijavitelj Komisiji, državam članicam in Agenciji predloži informacije iz točke 1 do 30. junija 2015, informacije iz točk 2, 3 in 4 pa do 31. decembra 2016.“
The notifier shall submit to the Commission, the Member States and the Authority the information set out in point (1) by 30 June 2015 and the information set out in points (2), (3) and (4) by 31 December 2016.’
V delu A Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011 se vrstica 259 o aktivni snovi Z,Z,Z,Z-7,13,16,19-dolosatetraen-1-il izobutirat nadomesti z naslednjim:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/309
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/309
imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain rainbow trout originating in Turkey
o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih šarenk s poreklom iz Turčije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 15 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 15 Uredbe,
The European Commission (‘the Commission’) imposed a provisional countervailing duty on imports of certain rainbow trout originating in Turkey by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1195/2014 [2] (‘the provisional Regulation’).
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1195/2014 [2] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz nekaterih šarenk s poreklom iz Turčije.
The Commission initiated the investigation following a complaint lodged on 3 January 2014 by the Danish Aquaculture Association (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of certain rainbow trout via a Notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union (‘Notice of initiation’) [3].
Komisija je preiskavo začela na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 3. januarja 2014 vložilo Dansko združenje za akvakulturo („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje nekaterih šarenk v Uniji, z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije („obvestilo o začetku“) [3].
As mentioned in recital 1 of the provisional Regulation, the Notice of initiation was subject to a corrigendum published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 4 September 2014 (‘the corrigendum’) [4].
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 1 začasne uredbe, je bilo obvestilo o začetku popravljeno s popravkom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije 4. septembra 2014 („popravek“) [4].
As set out in recital 23 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of subsidy and injury covered the period from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013 (‘the investigation period’).
Kot navaja uvodna izjava 23 začasne uredbe, je preiskava subvencioniranja in škode zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2013 do 31. decembra 2013 („obdobje preiskave“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2010 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Preiskava trendov, pomembnih za oceno škode, je obsegala obdobje od 1. januarja 2010 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which a provisional countervailing duty was imposed (‘provisional disclosure’), several interested parties made written submissions with respect to the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila uvedena začasna izravnalna dajatev („začasno razkritje“), je več zainteresiranih strani predložilo pisna stališča glede začasnih ugotovitev.
The Aegean Exporters' Association (‘AEA’) requested a hearing with the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings (‘Hearing Officer’).
Egejsko združenje izvoznikov je zahtevalo zaslišanje pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih („pooblaščenec za zaslišanje“).
The alleged change of the product scope by way of corrigendum, the inclusion of smoked rainbow trout in the product scope and the calculation of standing were discussed during the hearing.
Poleg vprašanj, ki so bila obravnavana na zaslišanju 26. novembra 2014, se je razpravljalo o metodologiji, ki je bila uporabljena za analizo škode, in predlaganem pristopu glede zavez.
A second meeting with the Hearing Officer took place on 8 January 2015.
Po preučitvi ustnih in pisnih pripomb, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, so bile začasne ugotovitve ustrezno spremenjene, kjer je bilo to potrebno.
In addition to the issues discussed at the hearing of 26 November 2014, the methodology applied for the injury analysis and the proposed approach with respect to undertakings were discussed.
Komisija je vse strani obvestila o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameravala uvesti dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz šarenk s poreklom iz Turčije in dokončno pobrati zneske, zavarovane z začasno dajatvijo („dokončno razkritje“).
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and, where appropriate, the provisional findings were modified accordingly.
Določeno je bilo obdobje, v katerem so lahko vse strani predložile pripombe v zvezi z dokončnim razkritjem.
The Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive countervailing duty on imports of rainbow trout originating in Turkey and definitively collect the amounts secured by way of provisional duty (‘final disclosure’).
Pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, so bile obravnavane in, kadar je bilo primerno, upoštevane.
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the definitive disclosure.
Vzorčenje
The comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Po začasnem razkritju se je Egejsko združenje izvoznikov sklicevalo na popravek obvestila o začetku iz uvodne izjave 2 in trdilo, da je Komisija z navedenim popravkom razširila opredelitev izdelka.
Sampling
Zaradi domnevne razširitve ni mogoče izključiti, da se nekateri turški izvozniki ob začetku preiskave niso javili in izpolnili obrazca za vzorčenje.
Following the provisional disclosure, AEA referred to the corrigendum to the Notice of initiation mentioned in recital 2 and claimed that by way of that corrigendum the Commission extended the product definition.
Zato je mogoče, da vzorec proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni več reprezentativen.
Because of the alleged extension it could not be excluded that some Turkish exporters did not come forward at initiation and did not complete the sampling form.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ista stran ponovila to pripombo, ne da bi predložila kakršno koli dodatno utemeljitev ali obrazložitev.
Therefore, the sample of the exporting producers may no longer be representative.
Zahtevane informacije je predložilo osemnajst skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Turčiji, ki so se strinjale z vključitvijo v vzorec.
After the final disclosure the same party reiterated its comment without providing any further substantiation or explanation.
Skupni obseg izvoza v Unijo, ki so ga ta podjetja prijavila v letu 2013, je predstavljal celoten izvoz iz Turčije v Unijo, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 14 začasne uredbe.
Eighteen groups of exporting producers in Turkey provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 15 začasne uredbe, je Komisija v skladu s členom 27(1) osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec štirih skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega izvoza v Unijo.
The total declared export volume to the Union by these companies during 2013 accounted for the totality of exports from Turkey to the Union as set out in recital 14 of the provisional Regulation.
Zato je vzorec reprezentativen, trditve zainteresirane strani v zvezi s tem pa so bile zavrnjene.
The sample represents 64 % of th e exports of the product concerned to the Union.
Individualna preiskava
Therefore the sample is representative and the party's claims in this regard were rejected.
Enajst podjetij ali skupin podjetij je zahtevalo individualno preiskavo na podlagi člena 27(3) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of any further comments regarding sampling, recitals 9 to 17 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Komisija je te zahtevke zavrnila, saj je število izvoznikov proizvajalcev tako veliko, da bi bile individualne preiskave nepotrebno breme in bi preprečevale pravočasen zaključek preiskave.
Individual examination
B. ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
Eleven companies or groups of companies requested individual examination under Article 27(3) of the basic Regulation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 24 začasne uredbe, je zadevni izdelek šarenka (Oncorhynchus mykiss):
The Commission rejected these requests as the number of exporting producers is so large that individual examination would be unduly burdensome and would prevent completion of the investigation in good time.
žive mase 1,2 kg ali manj posamezno ali
B. PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
sveže, ohlajene, zamrznjene in/ali dimljene:
As set out in recital 24 of the provisional Regulation, the product concerned is rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss):
v obliki cele ribe (z glavo), s škrgami ali brez njih, z drobovjem ali brez njega, mase 1,2 kg ali manj posamezno, ali
live weighing 1,2 kg or less each, or
brez glave, s škrgami ali brez njih, z drobovjem ali brez njega, mase 1 kg ali manj posamezno, ali
fresh, chilled, frozen and/or smoked:
v obliki filetov mase 400 g ali manj posamezno,
in the form of whole fish (with heads on), whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1,2 kg or less each, or
s poreklom iz Turčije in trenutno uvrščena pod oznake KN ex03019190, ex03021180, ex03031490, ex03044290, ex03048290 in ex03054300 („zadevni izdelek“).
with heads off, whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1 kg or less each, or
Kot že omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 9, je po začasnem razkritju ena zainteresirana stran trdila, da je Komisija s popravkom razširila obseg izdelka v preiskavi, kar naj bi potrjeval člen 1(1) začasne uredbe.
in the form of fillets weighing 400 g or less each,
Ta stran je trdila, da je takšna razširitev obsega izdelka nezakonita.
originating in Turkey and currently falling within CN codes ex03019190, ex03021180, ex03031490, ex03044290, ex03048290 and ex03054300 (‘the product concerned’).
Nadalje je trdila, da bi se bilo treba z zainteresiranimi stranmi posvetovati o domnevni razširitvi obsega izdelka.
Following provisional disclosure, and as already mentioned in recital 9, one interested party claimed that the Commission had expanded the product scope of the investigation by way of corrigendum which was allegedly confirmed by Article 1(1) of the provisional Regulation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 25 začasne uredbe, popravek ni vplival na obseg izdelka, temveč je bil izključno redakcijski.
This party argued that such expansion of the product scope was unlawful.
Tako so v obseg izdelka že od začetka zajete šarenke porcijske velikosti v vseh različnih predstavitvah.
Furthermore they claimed that interested parties should have been consulted on the alleged expansion of the product scope.
Med preiskavo je postalo očitno, da je opis različnih predstavitev znotraj obsega izdelka dvoumen in da obstajajo določene nedoslednosti med različnimi jezikovnimi različicami, objavljenimi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, ki jih je bilo treba pojasniti.
As stated in the recital 25 of the provisional Regulation, the corrigendum did not affect the product scope, but was purely editorial.
Na primer, ob dobesedni razlagi obsega izdelka bi bilo mogoče razumeti, da se drobovje odstrani živim ribam.
Thus, from the outset, the product scope covered portion-size rainbow trout in all various presentations.
Vendar se je izkazalo, da so vse zainteresirane strani, ki so bile pozvane, naj izpolnijo ustrezne vprašalnike, poročale o vseh vrstah izdelkov kljub uradniški napaki, zato je bilo sklenjeno, da so od začetka sedanjega postopka dejansko vse razumele, da so bile v obseg izdelka vključene vse vrste.
During the investigation it became apparent that the description of the different presentations within the product scope was ambiguous and that there were some inconsistencies between various language versions published in the Official Journal of the European Union, which required clarification.
Zainteresirane strani so bile takoj po objavi popravka obveščene po elektronski pošti, vendar nobena ni predložila pripomb ali trdila, da so ji bile kršene pravice do obrambe.
For example, a literal reading of the product scope would have entailed that live fish would be gutted.
Poleg tega so proizvajalci izvozniki med preiskavo Komisiji poročali o vseh predstavitvah, ki so zajete v opredelitvi izdelka.
However, it appeared that all interested parties which were requested to fill in the relevant questionnaires reported all product types despite the clerical mistake and therefore it was concluded that there was indeed a common understanding that all types were included in the product scope from initiation of the current proceeding.
Zato so bile trditve zainteresirane strani v zvezi s tem zavrnjene.
Interested parties were informed immediately following the publication of the corrigendum by e-mail but none of them submitted any comments or claimed a violation of their rights of defence.
Dve zainteresirani strani sta ponovno trdili, da bi bilo treba dimljeno postrv izključiti iz obsega izdelka.
Also, during the investigation, all presentations produced as covered by the product definition had been reported to the Commission by the exporting producers.
Izpodbijali sta ugotovitev Komisije iz uvodne izjave 29 začasne uredbe, da imajo različne predstavitve zadevnega izdelka, kot je „živ“, „ohlajen“, „zamrznjen“ ali „dimljen“, zajete z opredelitvijo zadevnega izdelka, enake osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemične lastnosti, ter se ponovno sklicevali na dve predhodni protidampinški preiskavi v zvezi z drugimi ribjimi izdelki (veliko amerikanko in lososom), ki sta bili zaključeni v letih 2004 [5] oziroma 2005 [6], pri katerih dimljeni izdelki niso bili vključeni v obseg izdelka.
Therefore, the party's claims in this regard were rejected.
Strani sta predložili informacije o učinkih postopka dimljenja, ki naj bi spremenil omenjene lastnosti.
Two interested parties reiterated that smoked trout should be excluded from the product scope.
Poleg tega sta ponovili, da se stroškovna struktura pri dimljenih filetih in drugih predstavitvah bistveno razlikuje ter da proizvodni proces dimljenih filetov vključuje precejšnje stroške dimljenja.
They contested the Commission conclusion set out in recital 29 of the provisional Regulation that the various presentations — ‘live’, ‘chilled’, ‘frozen’ or ‘smoked’ — covered by the definition of the product concerned shared the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics and referred again to two prior anti-dumping investigations concerning other fish products (large rainbow trout and salmon) concluded in 2004 [5] and 2005 [6] respectively where smoked products were not within the product scope.
Po dokončnem razkritju je Egejsko združenje izvoznikov trdilo, da Komisija ni pojasnila, za katere osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemične lastnosti dimljene ali nedimljene postrvi je bilo ugotovljeno, da so si podobne.
The parties brought forward information on the effects of the smoking process which allegedly changed the aforementioned characteristics.
Egejsko združenje izvoznikov je nadalje trdilo, da je predložilo dokaze, da ima dimljena postrv na primer drugačno kemično strukturo, drugačne senzorične značilnosti in drugačno hranilno vrednost kot nedimljena postrv.
Furthermore, they reiterated that the cost structure of smoked fillets and other presentations would be significantly different and that the production process of smoked fillets involved significant smoking costs.
Kljub učinkom postopka dimljenja je Komisija menila, da so glavne osnovne lastnosti, kot so pojasnjene v uvodni izjavi 29 začasne uredbe, podobne in ne upravičujejo izključitve dimljenih izdelkov iz obsega izdelka.
After the final disclosure the AEA claimed that the Commission had not clarified which were the basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics of smoked and non-smoked trout that were found to be similar.
V nasprotju s trditvami Egejskega združenja izvoznikov izdelek, ki je postrv v različnih predstavitvah, namenjen za prehrano ljudi, ohranja svoje lastnosti ter osnovne kemične in hranilne vrednosti, tudi če je dimljen.
The AEA further claimed that they had provided evidence showing that smoked trout had for example a different chemical structure, different sensory characters and a different nutrition value than non-smoked trout.
Informacije o učinkih p ostopka dimljenja, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, niso vsebovale dokazov o tem, da bi se navedene osnovne lastnosti med postopkom dimljenja bistveno spremenile.
Despite the effects of the smoking process, the Commission considered that the main basic characteristics as explained in the recital 29 of the provisional Regulation remain similar and did not justify the exclusion of the smoked products from the product scope.
To vprašanje je bilo obravnavano tudi na zaslišanjih pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje iz uvodne izjave 5.
Contrary to what was claimed by AEA, the product, which is trout in various presentations destined for human consumption, maintains its characteristics and its basic chemical and nutritional qualities also when smoked.
Poleg tega so vse vrste zadevnega izdelka, tudi dimljena postrv, zajete v poglavju 3 kombinirane nomenklature [7] in se jasno razlikujejo od izdelkov iz rib, ki so zajeti v poglavju 16 navedene nomenklature.
The information on the effects of the smoking process, that the parties had brought forward, did not provide evidence that the aforementioned basic characteristics would fundamentally change in the process of smoking.
V zvezi z različnimi stroškovnimi strukturami zadevne strani niso dodatno utemeljile svojih trditev.
The issue was also discussed in the hearings with the Hearing Officer referred to in the recital 5.
Poleg tega, kot je že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 30 začasne uredbe, je preiskava pokazala, da je stroškovna struktura pri dimljenih filetih in drugih predstavitvah dejansko podobna.
Furthermore, all categories of the product concerned, including smoked trout, are covered under chapter 3 of the Combined Nomenclature [7] and are clearly distinguished from preparations of fish which are covered under Chapter 16 of the same nomenclature.
Glavni stroškovni element, ki predstavlja 50 % skupnih stroškov vsake predstavitve, so bili stroški gojenja, ki so v glavnem vsebovali stroške krme (ribja moka in ribje olje), skupaj s stroški energije in stroški iker ali mladic.
Regarding different cost structures, the parties concerned did not further substantiate their claim.
V vsakem primeru je bil narejen izračun nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 112 in 113 začasne uredbe, in sicer s primerjavo cen za posamezno vrsto izdelka.