natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
France presents the modulated charge arrangement in force from 15 February to 31 July 2009 and explains that 24 airlines benefited from this.
Pojasnjuje, da so bili pogoji pogodbe določeni na podlagi študije donosnosti finančnih marž, ustvarjenih z letom družbe Ryanair, ki je bila opravljena pred sklenitvijo pogodbe in predložena v podporo njenim ugotovitvam.
It notes that the arrangement was annulled by Marseille Administrative Court in its judgment of 30 June 2009, on the ground that the modulation was too large, and was replaced from 1 February 2010 by an arrangement under which the proposed discount rates were reduced and the conditions for granting these discounts were made stricter.
Iz te študije naj bi izhajalo, da bo donosnost pogodbe dosežena od četrtega leta obratovanja, z maržo v višini […]* EUR na let po oglaševanju.
France maintains that the conditions laid down by the Manchester decision were met in the case of both modulated charge arrangements, with the modulations in question not falling within the scope of Article 107 TFEU.
Francija poudarja, da iz iste študije izhaja, da donosnost, izhajajoča iz vsote prilagoditev za odprtje novih prog in pogodbe z družbo AMS, samo na letih družbe Ryanair v obdobju 2007–2021 predstavlja povprečno stopnjo marže ([…]* %) glede na standard donosnosti v sektorju, ki ga je Komisija v svojem sklepu v zvezi z letališčem Bratislava [30] ocenila na 7,31 %.
According to France, the Commission therefore wrongly examined, in its opening decision, the modulations in question with regard to the market economy operator principle.
Iz simulacije donosnosti, posodobljene na podlagi ustvarjenega prometa in stroškov, ki jih je revidirala skupina Mazars, je razvidna stopnja dobička od tretjega leta, in sicer v višini […]* EUR na let.
REDUCTIONS GRANTED ON THE OVERNIGHT PARKING CHARGE
Francija tudi trdi, da je ob upoštevanju prihodkov iz pristojbin za letalske dejavnosti, prihodkov iz neletalskih dejavnosti in letališke takse, pa tudi drugih dajatev, marža na odhajajočega potnika pred podpisom pogodbe [31] znašala […]* EUR.
France maintains that this discount was introduced, like the one for new routes, for general interest issues.
Ker je torej povprečni ocenjeni znesek za ukrepe trženja (med katerimi so ukrepi družbe AMS) […]* EUR na odhodnega potnika, je torej neto marža stroškov trženja […]* EUR na potnika.
Modulation of the overnight parking charge enabled Marseille Provence Airport to increase flight flows at the start and end of the day, ensuring that optimum use was made of the infrastructure.
Tako je treba po mnenju Francije ugotoviti finančno korist za letališče za vsakega potnika na terminalu mp2.
France underlines that the impact of this measure was limited to […]* % of the parking charge turnover, excluding the effects of modulations for creating new routes.
Tako je lahko letališče med letoma 2006 in 2012 zabeležilo povprečno zaračunano stopnjo na potnika med […]* EUR na potnika in […]* EUR na potnika, pri čemer je povprečje v sedmih letih nekoliko pod pričakovanji, vendar zadostno in znaša […]* EUR na potnika.
France states that, in its view, modulations for general interest issues should not be assessed strictly in terms of their profitability.
Francija dodaja, da se je pogodba, sklenjena z družbo AMS, nanašala na različne zaveze družbe Ryanair glede števila zrakoplovov, stacioniranih na letališču Marseille Provence, pogostosti letov na dan in števila potnikov na leto.
However, it also points out that compliance with the market economy operator principle has been proven in this case, based on the ‘calculation of additional costs generated by overnight parking’ study resulting from the 2004 accounts.
Tako vsota stroškov pogodbe z družbo AMS na potnika družbe Ryanair in skupnih dodatnih stroškov za potnika družbe Ryanair razkriva skupne stroške v višini […]* EUR na potnika, s čimer je ugotovljena dodatna marža, povezana s prisotnostjo družbe Ryanair, ob upoštevanju stroškov, povezanih s pogodbo z družbo AMS, v zadostni višini […]* EUR na potnika.
The modulated charges encouraged airlines to base their aircraft at the airport, where the parking areas were unused at night and therefore available at limited additional cost to the airport.
Nazadnje, Francija trdi, da je sodnik za začasne odredbe pri upravnem sodišču v Marseillu v sklepu z dne 20. oktobra 2009 ugotovil, da letni zneski, predvideni s pogodbo z družbo AMS, glede na storitve, ki jih mora ta zagotoviti, in pomen javnosti, ki ji je vzpostavljeni promocijski mehanizem namenjen, niso niti brezpredmetni niti niso brez zadostnega nadomestila.
The time slots available under the measure were most popular with business customers, who generate the highest commercial revenues.
Francoska država trdi, da je merilo preudarnega udeleženca v tržnem gospodarstvu izpolnjeno, kadar ima politika, ki jo izvaja letališče, pozitivne finančne učinke za obratovanje letališča.
A large proportion of the costs associated with the parking charge consists of depreciation and financial costs, the useful life of which is not affected by stationary overnight parking, and business tax, which is unconnected with the use of parking areas.
Zato je treba analizo opreti na večletne poslovne načrte na podlagi nekaterih meril, kot sta čista sedanja vrednost (ČSV) in notranja stopnja donosa, skupaj s preskusi občutljivosti.
The additional costs generated by the overnight parking were therefore limited to labour, maintenance, repair and consumable costs, i.e. EUR […]* per night and per aircraft.
V zvezi s tem analiza naložb, ki jih izvede letališče, temelji na dveh načelih: upoštevanju „dejanskih“ tokov sredstev in vrednosti časa na podlagi posodobitve teh tokov sredstev.
France explains that the profitability calculations for these modulated charges for overnight parking were based on financial margin per flight studies presented in the September 2005 business plan, updated in May 2006, which reveal turnovers per rotation of EUR […]* for Terminal mp1 and EUR […]* for Terminal mp2.
Francija meni, da sta bili posledici izvedbe terminala mp2 zlasti:
For Terminal mp1, only the medium-haul national flights (Orly shuttle) were regarded as generating additional rotations.
porazdelitev nekaterih stroškov med oba terminala, s čimer so se znižali stroški glavnega terminala;
For Terminal mp2, each of the aircraft of those low-cost airlines not operating single daily return flights from their base was regarded as likely to generate an additional daily rotation.
preložitev izvedbe nekaterih naložb, katerih stroški vplivajo na notranjo stopnjo donosa, kot je izgradnja območja za prijavo evropskih potnikov in hale za vkrcanje za evropske in mednarodne lete.
For the sake of prudence, a weighting factor of 50 % was taken into account to reduce the impact of these additional margins per rotation on each of the terminals.
Porazdelitev stroškov in preložitev izvedbe nekaterih naložb, ki ju povzroči novi terminal mp2, vplivata na višino stopenj, ki jih je treba sprejeti v zvezi s tem terminalom, in promet, vključen v izračun notranje stopnje donosa.
Using these assumptions, France has produced, with its response, a document according to which the average net income/turnover ratio was […]* % and the net present value (NPV) updated to 7,5 % was EUR […]* over the 2005-2021 period.
Zato Francija meni, da pristop, ki ga je sprejelo letališče, ustreza odločitvi, ki bi jo sprejel zasebni udeleženec.
A sensitivity study on the weighting factor shows that the average profit margin remains above […]* % up to a factor value of 35 %, which means that the discount would generate a profit for the airport even when only one aircraft out of three parking overnight generated an additional rotation.
Meni namreč, da je analiza, ki jo je opravila družba PwC, napačna, ker ji ta očita, da ni izdelala poslovnega načrta „na podlagi predpostavk samo za terminal mp2“, česar pa družba PwC ne opredeli.
Table 4
Francija v zvezi s tem opozarja, da vprašanja porazdelitve stroškov med različne uporabnike različnih terminalov spadajo v okvir analize razlikovanja v stopnjah pristojbin letališča in ne v okvir študije donosnosti projekta novega terminala.
Profitability simulation of the overnight parking modulation
PRIPOMBE ZAINTERESIRANIH TRETJIH STRANI
Income (EUR '000)
Družba Air France trdi, da čeprav so subvencije, odobrene za nadgradnjo infrastrukture letališča, koristile vsem prevoznikom, prisotnim na letališču Marseille Provence, lahko posebne subvencije za naložbe na terminalu mp2 povzročijo izkrivljanje konkurence med letalskimi prevozniki, ki uporabljajo vsakega od terminalov.
Costs (EUR '000)
Družba Air France izpodbija oceno Komisije v sklepu o začetku postopka, da je dostop do terminala mp2 enak in nediskriminacijski.
Margin (EUR '000)
Zaradi odločitve zbornice CCIMP, da terminal mp2 rezervira za promet „od točke do točke“, naj bi bila družba Air France, ki opravlja tudi mednarodne lete in med drugim prevaža transferne potnike, prisiljena razdeliti svoje lete z odhodom iz Marseilla med oba terminala, zaradi česar se je odpovedala uporabi terminala mp2.
Net margin (EUR '000)
Odprtje terminala mp2 od oktobra 2006 za mednarodne lete, ki jih opravlja družba Ryanair, naj bi po mnenju družbe Air France dokazovalo prednostno obravnavo tega prevoznika s strani zbornice CCIMP.
Average ratio
Družba Air France trdi, da se zdi, da je bil edini namen pogojev za upravičenost do uporabe terminala mp2, ki jih je prvotno določila zbornica CCIMP, zagotoviti, da se ne bi mogla potegovati za uporabo novega terminala, saj ekonomsko ravnovesje letališča nedvomno ne bi bilo zagotovljeno, če bi lahko družba Air France prenesla vse svoje dejavnosti na terminal mp2, na katerem je bila višina pristojbine bistveno nižja.
NPV at […]* % over […]* years (EUR '000)
SUBVENCIJE ZA TEKOČE POSLOVANJE ZBORNICE CCIMP
NPV at […]* % over […]* years (EUR)
Družba Air France navaja, da je mogoče, da višina letališke takse, pobrane za račun države, vendar v celoti prenesene na upravljavca letališča, ne ustreza dejansko nastalim stroškom letališča za financiranje ukrepov, ki spadajo pod izvajanje javnih pooblastil, in bi tako lahko pomenila subvencijo za tekoče poslovanje letališča Marseille Provence.
Based on a study conducted using the 2008 accounts, the variable costs of the overnight parking charge were EUR […]* per aircraft per night, with the 2004 estimate being EUR […]*.
POMOČI, KI JIH JE LETALIŠČE MARSEILLE PROVENCE DODELILO NEKATERIM LETALSKIM PREVOZNIKOM
In the case of a B737-800 with a load factor of 80 %, these costs represent EUR […]* per passenger and, in the case of an A319 with a load factor of 70 %, they are EUR […]* per passenger.
Znižane potniške pristojbine za nacionalne lete
However, based on the accounts submitted to Cocoéco on 18 February 2009, the shop and parking activities covered [between 100 % and 150 %] of the passenger costs for Terminal mp1, i.e. a net margin of EUR […]* per passenger, and [between 100 % and 150 %] of the passenger costs for Terminal mp2, i.e. a net margin of EUR […]* per passenger.
Družba Air France ne izpodbija ugotovitve Komisije v sklepu o začetku postopka, v skladu s katero lahko izgradnja nizkocenovnega terminala ustreza povpraševanju na trgu.
These net margins broadly covered the additional costs of the overnight parking.
Vendar opozarja, da se mora upravljavec letališča prepričati o donosnosti takega projekta.
Lastly, France points out that the Commission did not make any criticism of the airport charges system organised at Charleroi Airport.
Družba Air France izpodbija trditev Komisije, v skladu s katero se zdi običajno, da si zasebni upravljavec letališča prizadeva doseči plačilo višjih pristojbin zaradi prevoza potnikov letalskih prevoznikov, ki se odločijo, da bodo ponujali udobnejšo storitev, in za stranke katerih je značilno, da so „pripravljene plačati“ več.
As regards the aid scheme established by the CCIMP decision of 21 November 2005, which resulted in a single payment [of less than EUR 300000] to bmibaby, France states in its submission of 28 December 2010 that this amount, even if it did constitute State aid, would in any event be covered by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 [28] (de minimis aid).
Trdi, da ni prispevala k določitvi ravni kakovosti storitve, ki se ponuja na terminalu, opredeljenem kot „udoben“, in opozarja, da se sprašuje o resnično nediskriminacijski naravi meril, ki jih upravljavci letališča uporabljajo za dostop do novega terminala, namenjenega nizkocenovnim prevoznikom.
Furthermore, it stresses that, following the announcement of this company's sale, the CCIMP may not have been able to obtain a sworn statement regarding aid received from other European airports.
Družba Air France trdi, da so prevozniki, ki že dolgo uporabljajo terminale, pogosto vezani na te infrastrukture.
As regards the agreement to purchase advertising space concluded with AMS on 19 May 2006, France maintains that this agreement was awarded, in accordance with public procurement regulations, without any prior competition due to the existence of a single supplier.
Meni, da lahko upravljavec letališča v monopolne položaju neprimerno zviša svoje stopnje pri teh vezanih strankah, da bi ponudil privlačne stopnje pristojbin strankam, ki uporabljajo nizkocenovne terminale, ki pa lahko svoje dejavnosti zlahka preselijo z enega letališča na drugo.
France notes that the promotional policy has a direct effect on an airport infrastructure's profitability due to the revenues generated through airport and non-aeronautical charges.
Družba Air France meni, da stopnje, ki se uporabljajo na letališču Marseille Provence, izhajajo iz odločitve o računovodski obravnavi, katere edina logika je dati prednost letalskim prevoznikom, ki uporabljajo terminal mp2.
It explains that the advertising carried out by airlines is insufficient and underlines that, in 2006, AMS was the only service-provider offering the combination of a unique and exclusive Ryanair ticket marketing system, with Ryanair being the only airline to undertake to establish an aircraft base at the new Terminal mp2, a large audience of internet users targeted by the promotional policy, and marketing services appropriate to the purchase of flight tickets to Provence as a destination.
Metoda porazdelitve splošnih stroškov naj bi po mnenju družbe Air France omogočala umetno znižanje stopnje potniške pristojbine, ki se uporablja na terminalu mp2.
France maintains that the CCIMP acted as a market economy operator by concluding the agreement with AMS, such that this agreement does not contain any form of aid.
Družba Air France želi, da bi Komisija pri svojem sklepanju upoštevala dejstvo, da so letališča „bistvene infrastrukture“ za letalske prevoznike in da mora posledično upravljavec letališča določiti stopnje, ki izražajo stroške opravljene storitve (obveznost, določena tudi z Direktivo 2009/12/ES).
France firstly considers that the agreed price was in line with market practices, particularly given the results of the prior comparative study conducted using the viamichelin.com website.
Družba Air France poudarja, da po njenem vedenju zbornica CCIMP ni nikoli sprejela ukrepa, s katerim bi izterjala dodatke k pristojbini, dolgovane iz naslova retroaktivne ponovne ocene stopenj potniške pristojbine na terminalu mp2.
France therefore disputes that the marketing services were provided by AMS under preferential conditions and points out that the European Commission, in its decision on Ostend Airport [29], accepted that the promotional programme involving a tour operator's catalogue did not constitute State aid.
Poudarja, da čeprav je Conseil d'État, ki je odločalo o izdaji začasne odredbe, na podlagi sklepa z dne 28. julija 2009 začasno odložilo plačevanje potniške pristojbine v višini 20 % za terminal mp1, zbornica CCIMP kljub temu ni zvišala zneska potniške pristojbine, ki je veljala na terminalu mp2.
Moreover, France maintains that the marketing services agreement concluded with AMS represented a profitable investment for Marseille Provence Airport, particularly with regard to the development of Terminal mp2.
Opozarja, da ker Conseil d'État ni razveljavilo stopenj, ki so se uporabljale na terminalu mp1 (sklep z dne 27. junija 2011), je bilo vseh 20 %, dobljenih na podlagi sklepa o začasni odredbi, nazadnje nakazanih zbornici CCIMP.
France explains that the terms of the agreement were determined based on a profitability study of the financial margins generated by a flight operated by Ryanair, which was conducted prior to the agreement being concluded and which has been produced in support of its claims.
Družba Air France poudarja, da je Komisija v predhodni odločbi [32] v zvezi s sistemom razlikovanja letaliških pristojbin glede na destinacijo leta (nacionalni/mednarodni) ugotovila obstoj sistema pomoči, ki ni združljiv s skupnim trgom.
This study showed that the contractual arrangement would become profitable from the fourth year of operation, with a margin of EUR […]* per flight after advertising.
Opozarja, da ker je Francija sprejela ukrepe za odpravo tega sistema, Komisija ni želela izvesti dodatnih koristnih ukrepov.
France emphasises that the same study shows that the profitability of all the modulations for the creation of new routes and the AMS agreement, with regard to Ryanair flights alone in the 2007-2021 period, results in an average profit margin ([…]* %) that is in line with the standard profitability in the sector, estimated by the European Commission at 7,31 % in its decision on Bratislava Airport [30].
Družba Air France na podlagi tega sklepa, da je zaradi predhodne odločbe Komisije vsaka nova preiskava tega sistema brezpredmetna.
The profitability simulation updated using actual traffic figures and costs audited by the Mazars consultancy indicates a profit margin from the third year of EUR […]* per flight.
Pristojbine za odprtje novih prog
France points out that the costs associated with the AMS agreement were taken into account in the September 2005 business plan, updated in May 2006, which indicated an overall profitability for Terminal mp2 [in excess of 7,5]* % over the 2005-2021 period.
Čeprav družba Air France priznava, da se lahko vsako letališče odloči za tak pristop, opozarja, da mora letališče dokazati, da je dejansko ravnalo kot preudaren udeleženec v tržnem gospodarstvu.
Based on the 2006 charges, the average net income/turnover ratio of the AMS agreement in relation to Ryanair traffic was [in excess of 7,5]* % and the NPV was EUR […]* million.
V zvezi s tem mora dokazati, da je namen ukrepa sčasoma doseči donosnost naložbe.
France further maintains that, taking into account not only the revenue from airport charges, non-aeronautical charges and airport tax, but also the revenue from other charges, the margin per outbound passenger was calculated, before the agreement was signed [31], at EUR […]*.
Cilj mora torej biti izboljšanje lastnih prihodkov in ne povečanje turističnega obiska regije.
With the estimated average amount of the marketing measures (including AMS in particular) being EUR […]* per outbound passenger, the net margin of the marketing costs was therefore EUR […]* per passenger.
Družba Air France dodaja, da mora biti tak ukrep, da bi bil sprejemljiv, pregleden, nediskriminacijski, degresiven in časovno omejen, da ne bi pomenil javnega financiranja stroškov poslovanja prevoznika, ki je do njega upravičen.
According to France, it should therefore be concluded that each passenger at Terminal mp2 was financially beneficial to the airport.
Družba Ryanair trdi, da subvencije za naložbe, dodeljene za izgradnjo terminala mp2, kažejo ravnanje preudarnega udeleženca v tržnem gospodarstvu.
As a result, between 2006 and 2012 the airport recorded an average billing rate per passenger between EUR […]* per passenger and EUR […]* per passenger, with a seven-year average slightly below expectations, but still sufficient at EUR […]* per passenger.
Po mnenju družbe Ryanair bi morala Komisija v analizi upoštevati prihodke iz neletalskih dejavnosti, ki jih je ustvaril terminal mp2, iz naslova najema vozil, pristojbine za uporabo parkirišča in dodatnih komercialnih prihodkov, ustvarjenih s prodajo potnikom terminala mp2, ki se lahko odpravijo v trgovine na glavnem terminalu, ki je od terminala mp2 oddaljen manj kot minuto hoje.
France adds that the agreement concluded with AMS contained various undertakings on the part of Ryanair with regard to the number of aircraft based at Marseille Provence Airport and the number of daily frequencies and passengers per year.
Družba Ryanair na podlagi tega sklepa, da prihodki iz neletalskih dejavnosti, ki jih ustvarijo potniki terminala mp2, bistveno prispevajo k donosnosti glavnega terminala.
Accordingly, adding the costs of the AMS agreement per Ryanair passenger to the total incremental cost per Ryanair passenger results in a total cost of EUR […]* per passenger, with the incremental margin associated with Ryanair's presence, taking into account the costs associated with the AMS agreement, therefore sitting at a satisfactory level of EUR […]* per passenger.
Zaprtje letališča, ki bi povzročilo dodatne stroške (odpuščanja, saniranja okolja, smotrnosti že izvedenih naložb), medtem ko bi bila lahko prodajna cena letališča nizka ali celo negativna, leta 2006 ni bilo ekonomsko upoštevna možnost.
Lastly, France maintains that Marseille Administrative Court, in an interim ruling of 20 October 2009, found that the annual amounts stipulated by the agreement concluded with AMS, when compared with the services to be provided by the latter and the size of the audience reached by the promotional arrangement, were not devoid of purpose or an adequate quid pro quo.
Strategija letališča, ki je privedla do povečanja prometa in prihodkov ter zmanjšanja neizkoriščene zmogljivosti letališča, je prispevala k zvišanju njegove tržne vrednosti.
France maintains that the market economy operator criterion is met where the policy adopted by the airport has positive financial effects on the airport's operation.
Družba Ryanair trdi, da bi lahko sredstva v zvezi s terminalom mp2 in izvedene naložbe privedli do zvišanja vrednosti ob prodaji, kar je v nasprotju s tem, kar trdi družba PwC.
To this end, the analysis should be based on multiannual business plans in the light of certain criteria such as the net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR), accompanied by sensitivity tests.
DOLOČITEV POTNIŠKIH PRISTOJBIN NA TERMINALU MP2
In this respect, two principles underlie the analysis of the airport's investments: ‘genuine’ cash flows must be used, and the effect of time must be taken into account by updating those cash flows.
Družba Ryanair trdi, da sklepa o določitvi potniške pristojbine, ki se uporablja na terminalu mp2, ni mogoče pripisati državi, v skladu z merili iz sodbe Stardust Marine [33].
France considers that the construction of Terminal mp2 has had the following effects in particular:
Poudarja, da se v francoski zakonodaji za gospodarske zbornice šteje, da spadajo v posebno kategorijo javnih subjektov, za katere je značilen neobstoj podrejenosti državi [34].
Certain costs have been pooled between the two terminals, thus reducing the costs of the main terminal.
Zato izpodbija pristop Komisije, ki o pripisljivosti zadevnih ukrepov domneva zgolj na podlagi dejstva, da je zbornica CCIMP pod nadzorom države, in opozarja, da mora Komisija v vsakem primeru preučiti posebne okoliščine, na podlagi katerih se ugotovi pripisljivost ukrepa.
Certain investments with a cost affecting the IRR have been postponed, such as the construction of the Europe check-in area and the Europe/International departure hall.
Družba Ryanair dodaja, da v primeru zbornice CCIMP Francija ne more biti pobudnica niti ni ravnala tako, da bi letališče spodbudila k sprejetju spornih ukrepov.
The pooling of costs and the delay of certain investments as a result of the new Terminal mp2 have had an effect on the charges adopted for the latter and the turnover included in the IRR calculation.
Trdi, da je direkcija DGAC, nasprotno, vedno znova zavračala stopnje, ki jih je sprejemala zbornica CCIMP [35].