natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 12 June 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/349/CFSP [3] which amended Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP and extended it until 14 June 2016.
Svet je 12. junija 2014 sprejel Sklep 2014/349/SZVP [3] o spremembi Skupnega ukrepa 2008/124/SZVP in ga podaljšal do 14. junija 2016.
On 11 June 2015, the Council adopted Decision 2015/901/CFSP [4] amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP, providing a financial reference amount for the period from 15 June 2015 until 14 June 2016.
Svet je 11. junija 2015 sprejel Sklep 2015/901/SZVP [4] o spremembi Skupnega ukrepa 2008/124/SZVP, v katerem je določil referenčni finančni znesek za obdobje od 15. junija 2015 do 14. junija 2016.
Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP should be amended to extend the mandate of EULEX Kosovo until 14 June 2018 and provide a new financial reference amount intended to cover the period from 15 June 2016 until 14 June 2017.
Skupni ukrep 2008/124/SZVP bi bilo treba spremeniti, da se mandat misije EULEX Kosovo podaljša do 14. junija 2018 in določi nov referenčni finančni znesek za kritje stroškov v obdobju od 15. junija 2016 do 14. junija 2017.
Nothing in this Decision should be understood as prejudicing the independence and the autonomy of the judges and prosecutors.
Nič v tem sklepu se ne bi smelo razumeti kot poseganje v neodvisnost in avtonomijo sodnikov in tožilcev.
Due to the special character of the activities of EULEX Kosovo in support of the relocated judicial proceedings within a Member State, it is appropriate to identify in this Decision the amount envisaged to cover the support to the relocated judicial proceedings within a Member State and to provide for the implementation of that part of the budget through a grant.
Zaradi posebnega značaja dejavnosti misije EULEX Kosovo v podporo sodnim postopkom, ki so bili preneseni znotraj države članice, je ustrezno v tem sklepu določiti znesek, namenjen kritju podpore za prenesene sodne postopke znotraj države članice, in zagotoviti izvajanje tega dela proračuna z dodelitvijo nepovratnih sredstev.
EULEX Kosovo will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty.
Misija EULEX Kosovo bo delovala v razmerah, ki se lahko poslabšajo in bi lahko ovirale doseganje ciljev zunanjega delovanja Unije, kot je določeno v členu 21 Pogodbe.
Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,
Skupni ukrep 2008/124/SZVP bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
in paragraph 1, the following subparagraphs are added:
v odstavku 1 se dodajo naslednji pododstavki:
‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of EULEX Kosovo from 15 June 2016 until 14 June 2017 shall be EUR 63600000.
„Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje stroškov EULEX KOSOVO od 15. junija 2016 do 14. junija 2017 znaša 63600000 EUR.
The latter amount shall also retroactively cover expenditure arising from the support to the relocated judicial proceedings as of 1 April 2016.
Referenčni finančni znesek za poznejše obdobje misije EULEX Kosovo določi Svet.
The Commission shall sign a grant agreement with a registrar acting on behalf of a registry in charge of the administration of the relocated judicial proceedings for that amount.
odstavek 4 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The rules on grants provided for in Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council shall apply to this grant agreement.
Za finančno izvrševanje proračuna misije je odgovorna EULEX KOSOVO, razen za znesek iz desetega pododstavka odstavka 1 v zvezi s podporo prenesenim sodnim postopkom znotraj države članice.
The financial reference amount for the subsequent period for EULEX Kosovo shall be decided by the Council.
V ta namen EULEX KOSOVO podpiše sporazum s Komisijo.“;
paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
drugi odstavek člena 20 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Except for the amount referred to in the 10th subparagraph of paragraph 1 related to the support to the relocated judicial proceedings within a Member State, EULEX Kosovo shall be responsible for the financial implementation of the Mission's budget.
„Veljati preneha 14. junija 2018.
For this purpose, EULEX Kosovo shall sign an agreement with the Commission.’.
Svet na predlog visokega predstavnika in ob upoštevanju dodatnih virov financiranja ter prispevkov drugih partnerjev sprejme potrebne sklepe, s katerimi zagotovi, da mandat EULEX KOSOVO za podporo prenesenim sodnim postopkom iz člena 3a in potrebna finančna sredstva ostanejo veljavni do zaključka teh sodnih postopkov.“
The second paragraph of Article 20 is replaced by the following:
Člen 2
‘It shall expire on 14 June 2018.
Ta sklep začne veljati na dan sprejetja.
The Council, acting on a proposal from the High Representative, and considering complementary sources of funding as well as contributions from other partners, shall take the necessary decisions in order to ensure that EULEX Kosovo's mandate in support of the relocated judicial proceedings referred to in Article 3a and the related necessary financial means shall remain in effect until such time as these judicial proceedings have been concluded.’.
V Luxembourgu, 14. junija 2016
Done at Luxembourg, 14 June 2016.
To poimenovanje ne posega v stališča o statusu ter je v skladu z RVSZN 1244(1999) in mnenjem Meddržavnega sodišča o razglasitvi neodvisnosti Kosova.
For the Council
Skupni ukrep Sveta 2008/124/SZVP z dne 4. februarja 2008 o misiji Evropske unije za krepitev pravne države na Kosovu (EULEX Kosovo) (UL L 42, 16.2.2008, str.
This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244(1999) and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.
Sklep Sveta 2014/349/SZVP z dne 12. junija 2014 o spremembi Skupnega ukrepa 2008/124/SZVP o misiji Evropske unije za krepitev pravne države na Kosovu, EULEX KOSOVO (UL L 174, 13.6.2014, str.
92).
Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2015/901 z dne 11. junija 2015 o spremembi Skupnega ukrepa 2008/124/SZVP o misiji Evropske unije za krepitev pravne države na Kosovu (EULEX KOSOVO) (UL L 147, 12.6.2015, str.
42).
Uredba (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 (UL L 298, 26.10.2012, str.
Council Decision (EU) 2016/949
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/949
on the signing, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, of the Protocol to the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Mongolia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union
o podpisu Protokola k Okvirnemu sqporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Mongolijo na drugi strani, v imenu Unije in njenih držav članic, zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 207 and 209, in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti členov 207 in 209, v povezavi s členom 218(5) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Republic of Croatia, and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pristopu Republike Hrvaške in zlasti člena 6(2) Akta,
Pursuant to Article 6(2) of the Act of Accession of the Republic of Croatia, the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Mongolia, of the other part, is to be agreed by the conclusion of a protocol to the Agreement.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Akta o pristopu Republike Hrvaške se pristop Republike Hrvaške k Okvirnemu sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Mongolijo na drugi strani sklene s protokolom k Sporazumu.
Pursuant to Article 6(2) of the Act of Accession, a simplified procedure is to apply to such an accession, whereby a protocol is to be concluded by the Council, acting unanimously on behalf of the Member States, and by the third countries concerned.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Akta o pristopu se za tak pristop uporablja poenostavljeni postopek, pri čemer se protokol sklene med Svetom, ki odloča soglasno v imenu držav članic, in zadevnimi tretjimi državami.
On 14 September 2012, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the third countries concerned.
Svet je 14. septembra 2012 Komisijo pooblastil za začetek pogajanj z zadevnimi tretjimi državami.
The negotiations were successfully concluded with Mongolia by means of a note verbale dated 2 December 2014.
Pogajanja z Mongolijo so bila s parafiranjem Protokola uspešno zaključena z verbalno noto z dne 2. decembra 2014.
The Protocol should be signed, subject to its conclusion at a later date,
Sporazum bi bilo treba podpisati s pridržkom njegove poznejše sklenitve –
The signing on behalf of the Union and its Member States of the Protocol to the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Mongolia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union [1] is hereby authorised, subject to the conclusion of the Protocol.
Podpis Protokola k Okvirnemu sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Mongolijo na drugi strani, v imenu Unije in njenih držav članic, zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji [1], se odobri s pridržkom sklenitve Protokola.
Council Decision (EU) 2016/954
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/954
authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions on the property regimes of international couples, covering both matters of matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships
o odobritvi okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju pristojnosti, prava, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanja in izvrševanja odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov, ki zajema tako področje premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema kot premoženjskopravne posledice registriranih partnerskih skupnosti
Having regard to the requests made by the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Republic of Croatia, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden,
ob upoštevanju prošenj Kraljevine Belgije, Republike Bolgarije, Češke republike, Zvezne republike Nemčije, Helenske republike, Kraljevine Španije, Francoske republike, Republike Hrvaške, Italijanske republike, Republike Ciper, Velikega vojvodstva Luksemburg, Malte, Kraljevine Nizozemske, Republike Avstrije, Portugalske republike, Republike Slovenije, Republike Finske in Kraljevine Švedske,
For the progressive establishment of such an area, the Union is to adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters with cross-border implications.
Za postopno vzpostavitev takega območja mora Unija sprejeti ukrepe v zvezi s pravosodnim sodelovanjem v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami.
Pursuant to Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of European Union (TFEU), those measures are to include promoting the compatibility of the rules applicable in the Member States concerning conflict of laws, including measures concerning family law with cross-border implications.
Na podlagi člena 81 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) bi morali ti ukrepi zajemati spodbujanje združljivosti pravil, ki se v državah članicah uporabljajo v primerih kolizije zakonov, vključno z ukrepi na področju družinskega prava s čezmejnimi posledicami.
On 16 March 2011, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes, and a proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions regarding the property consequences of registered partnerships.
Komisija je 16. marca 2011 sprejela predlog uredbe Sveta o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanju in izvrševanju sodnih odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema in predlog uredbe Sveta o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanju in izvrševanju sodnih odločb na področju premoženjskopravnih posledic registriranih partnerskih skupnosti.
At its meeting of 3 December 2015 the Council concluded that it would not be possible to reach an agreement within a reasonable period by the Union as a whole for the adoption of the regulations.
Svet je na zasedanju 3. decembra 2015 ugotovil, da v okviru Unije kot celote v razumnem času ne bo mogoče doseči soglasja za sprejetje uredb.
In these circumstances, Malta, Croatia and Belgium subsequently addressed requests to the Commission by letters dated 14 December 2015, 15 December 2015 and 17 December 2015 respectively, and Germany, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal, Slovenia and Sweden by letters dated 18 December 2015, indicating that they wished to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships and that the Commission should submit a proposal to the Council to that end.
V teh okoliščinah so nato Malta, Hrvaška in Belgija z dopisi z dne 14. decembra 2015, 15. decembra 2015 oziroma 17. decembra 2015 ter Nemčija, Grčija, Španija, Francija, Italija, Luksemburg, Portugalska, Slovenija in Švedska z dopisi z dne 18. decembra 2015 Komisiji poslali prošnje, v katerih je bilo navedeno, da želijo med seboj vzpostaviti okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju pristojnosti, prava, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanja in izvrševanja odločb na področjih premoženjskih razmerij med zakoncema in premoženjskopravnih posledic registriranih partnerskih skupnosti ter da naj Komisija v zvezi s tem predloži predlog Svetu.
By letter to the Commission dated 18 March 2016, Cyprus indicated its wish to participate in the establishment of the enhanced cooperation; Cyprus reiterated this wish during the work of the Council.
Z okrepljenim sodelovanjem naj bi se v sodelujočih državah članicah oblikoval jasen in celovit pravni okvir na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov, ki zajema tako premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema kot premoženjskopravne posledice registriranih partnerskih skupnosti, zagotovile ustrezne rešitve za državljane glede pravne varnosti, predvidljivosti in prilagodljivosti ter olajšal pretok odločb in javnih listin med sodelujočimi državami članicami.
In total, 18 Member States have requested such enhanced cooperation.
V skladu s prošnjami držav članic za vzpostavitev okrepljenega sodelovanja bi morala dva vsebinska akta izvajati okrepljeno sodelovanje, eden v zvezi s premoženjskimi razmerji med zakoncema in drugi v zvezi s premoženjskopravnimi posledicami registriranih partnerskih skupnosti.
The enhanced cooperation should provide a clear and comprehensive legal framework in the area of the property regimes of international couples, covering both matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships, in the participating Member States, ensure adequate solutions for citizens in terms of legal certainty, predictability and flexibility, and facilitate the circulation of decisions and authentic instruments between the participating Member States.
Da bi se zajelo celotno področje uporabe okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov in zagotovila nediskriminacija državljanov, bi bilo treba oba vsebinska izvedbena akta sprejeti hkrati.
In accordance with the Member States' requests for the establishment of enhanced cooperation, two substantive acts should implement enhanced cooperation, one concerning matrimonial property regimes and the other concerning the property consequences of registered partnerships.
Izpolnjeni so pogoji iz člena 20 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in členov 326 do 329 PDEU.
In order to cover the entire scope of enhanced cooperation in the area of the property regimes of international couples and to ensure non-discrimination of citizens, the two substantive implementing acts should be adopted simultaneously.
Ustrezno področje okrepljenega sodelovanja, torej pristojnost, pravo, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanje in izvrševanje odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov, ki zajema tako premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema kot premoženjskopravne posledice registriranih partnerskih skupnosti, je s točkama (a) in (c) člena 81(2) ter členom 81(3) PDEU opredeljeno kot eno od področij iz Pogodb.
The conditions laid down in Article 20 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and in Articles 326 to 329 TFEU are fulfilled.
Ne gre za področje, ki je v izključni pristojnosti Unije.
The relevant area of the enhanced cooperation, namely jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in the matter of property regimes of international couples, covering both matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships, is identified by points (a) and (c) of Article 81(2) and (3) TFEU as one of the areas covered by the Treaties.
Zahteva glede zadnjega sredstva iz člena 20(2) PEU je izpolnjena, saj je Svet 3. decembra 2015 ugotovil, da Unija kot celota ne more v razumnem času doseči ciljev predlaganih uredb.
This is not an area of exclusive competence of the Union.
Namen okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju pristojnosti, prava, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanja in izvrševanja odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov, ki zajema tako premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema kot premoženjskopravne posledice registriranih partnerskih skupnosti, je razvijati sodelovanje v civilnopravnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami na podlagi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb ter zagotoviti združljivost predpisov, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah glede kolizije zakonov.
The requirement of last resort in Article 20(2) TEU is fulfilled in that the Council concluded on 3 December 2015 that the objectives of the proposed regulations could not be attained within a reasonable period by the Union as a whole.
Tako uresničuje cilje Unije, ščiti njene interese in krepi njene integracijske procese, kot je določeno v členu 20(1) PEU.
Enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in the matter of property regimes of international couples, covering both matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships, aims to develop judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments, and to ensure the compatibility of the rules applicable in the Member States concerning conflict of laws.
Okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju pristojnosti, prava, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanja in izvrševanja odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov, ki zajema tako premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema kot premoženjskopravne posledice registriranih partnerskih skupnosti, je skladno s pogodbama in pravom Unije ter ne škoduje notranjemu trgu ali ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji.
Thus, it furthers the objectives of the Union, protects its interests and reinforces its integration process as required by Article 20(1) TEU.
Ne pomeni ovire ali diskriminacije v trgovini med državami članicami in ne izkrivlja konkurence med njimi.
Enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in the matter of property regimes of international couples, covering both matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships, complies with the Treaties and Union law, and it does not undermine the internal market or economic, social and territorial cohesion.
Okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju pristojnosti, prava, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanja in izvrševanja odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov, ki zajema tako premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema kot premoženjskopravne posledice registriranih partnerskih skupnosti, je s pravom Unije na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah skladno, saj ne vpliva na pravni red na tem področju.
It does not constitute a barrier to or discrimination in trade between Member States and does not distort competition between them.
Okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju pristojnosti, prava, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanja in izvrševanja odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov, ki zajema tako premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema kot premoženjskopravne posledice registriranih partnerskih skupnosti, spoštuje pristojnosti, pravice in obveznosti držav članic, ki v njem ne sodelujejo.
In particular, enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in the matter of property regimes of international couples, covering both matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships, complies with Union law on judicial cooperation in civil matters, in that enhanced cooperation does not affect the acquis in this area.
Skupna pravila o pristojnosti, koliziji zakonov ter priznavanju in izvrševanju v sodelujočih državah članicah ne vplivajo na pravila nesodelujočih držav članic.
Enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in the matter of property regimes of international couples, covering both matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships, respects the competences, rights and obligations of those Member States that do not participate in it.
Sodišča nesodelujočih držav članic bodo še naprej uporabljala svoja obstoječa nacionalna pravila za določitev pristojnosti in prava, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanje in izvrševanje odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov, ki zajema tako premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema kot premoženjskopravne posledice registriranih partnerskih skupnosti.
The common rules on jurisdiction, conflict of laws and recognition and enforcement in the participating Member States do not affect the rules of the non-participating Member States.
Ta sklep spoštuje načela iz Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in zlasti tista iz členov 9 in 21 Listine.
The courts of the non-participating Member States will continue to apply their existing domestic rules to determine the jurisdiction and applicable law and to the recognition and enforcement of decisions in the matter of property regimes of international couples, covering both matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships.
V okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju pristojnosti, prava, ki se uporablja, ter priznavanja in izvrševanja odločb na področju premoženjskih razmerij mednarodnih parov, ki zajema tako premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema kot premoženjskopravne posledice registriranih partnerskih skupnosti, se lahko v skladu s členom 328 PDEU kadar koli vključi vsaka država članica –
This Decision respects the principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular those in Articles 9 and 21 thereof.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in the matter of property regimes of international couples, covering both matrimonial property regimes and the property consequences of registered partnerships, is open, at any time, to all Member States, in accordance with Article 328 TFEU,
Člen 1