natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, the Commission notes that, in order to ensure a level playing field, the status of an assisted area can only be established by a Commission decision, according to the criteria of the applicable Regional Aid Guidelines, and not based on other territorial characteristics or an economic recession.
Sporočilo Komisije – Smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah (UL C 244, 1.10.2004, str. 2), katerega veljavnost je bila podaljšana leta 2009 (UL C 156, 9.7.2009, str. 3) in leta 2012 (UL C 296, 2.10.2012, str. 3).
Thus, the Commission cannot accept less stringent conditions as regards the criteria for the aid.
Ta je nižja od obrestne mere, navedene v priglasitvi pomoči za reševanje, glej uvodno izjavo 29.
‘One time, last time’ principle
Odločba Komisije z dne 22. februarja 2006 v zadevi N 464/2005 v zvezi s pomočjo za prestrukturiranje za AB Kauno ketaus liejykla (UL C 270, 7.11.2006, str. 2); Odločba Komisije z dne 18. julija 2001 v zadevi NN 92/1999, ukrepi v korist Zentrum Mikroelektronik Dresden AG – Sachsen (UL C 328, 23.11.2001, str. 5); Odločba Komisije z dne 1. junija 2005 v zadevi N 584/2004, pomoč za prestrukturiranje za AB Vingriai (UL C 187, 30.7.2005, str. 15); Odločba Komisije 2010/3/ES z dne 6. novembra 2008 o državni pomoči C 19/05 (ex N 203/05) Poljske za Stocznia Szczecińska (UL L 5, 8.1.2010, str. 1).
Point 73 Section 3.3 of the 2004 Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines stipulates that rescue and/or restructuring aid should be granted only once and ‘where less than 10 years have elapsed since the rescue aid was granted or the restructuring period came to an end or implementation of the restructuring plan has been halted (whichever is the latest), the Commission will not allow further rescue or restructuring aid.’
Vendar ciprski organi nikoli niso predložili podatkov, ki bi to trditev potrdili.
This condition is known as the ‘one time, last time’ principle.
PASYPI-PALPU (sindikat pilotov ciprskih letalskih prevoznikov), SYNIKA (sindikat zaposlenih v družbi Cyprus Airways), ASYSEKA (neodvisni sindikat zaposlenih v skupini Cyprus Airways), SIDIKEK PEO (sindikat zaposlenih v delno javnih organizacijah in javnem sektorju na Cipru), SYPKKA (sindikat stevardes in stevardov družbe Cyprus Airways).
An exception to the ‘one time, last time’ principle is provided for in point 73(c) of Section 3.3 [please confirm]:
Glej na primer zadevo C-305/89, Italija proti Komisiji („Alfa Romeo“), Recueil 1991, str.
in exceptional and unforeseeable circumstances.’
I-1603, točki 18 in 19; zadevo T-16/96, Cityflyer Express proti Komisiji, Recueil 1998, str.
The Commission has approved restructuring aid to Cyprus Airways in 2007 on the basis of a restructuring plan.
II-757, točka 51; združene zadeve T-129/95, T-2/96 in T-97/96, Neue Maxhütte Stahlwerke in Lech-Stahlwerke proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str.
Cyprus Airways is therefore in principle not eligible for further restructuring aid at present according to the ‘one time, last time’ principle and the Commission raised doubts as to whether exceptional and unforeseeable circumstances within the meaning of point 73(c) exist in this case.
II-17, točka 104; združeni zadevi T-268/08 in T-281/08, Land Burgenland in Avstrija proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Despite having commented extensively on that point following the opening of two formal investigation procedures, the Cypriot authorities were not able to justify why Cyprus Airways was faced with exceptional and unforeseeable circumstances, which would merit further restructuring aid.
2012, str.
In particular, the Turkey overflight ban was introduced in 1974 and Cyprus has put in place an approved scheme for compensation of the additional costs incurred by any affected airlines, including Cyprus Airways (see recital 23 above).
II-0000, točka 48.
Thus, this event cannot qualify as exceptional and unforeseeable circumstance and the Cypriot authorities did not bring forward new evidence in that respect.
Zadeva C-364/90, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1993, str.
For similar reasons, the operation of an ‘illegal’ airport in the northern part of Cyprus also cannot be considered as exceptional and unforeseeable circumstance, as the possibility for tourists to travel to and from the northern part of Cyprus has been in place at least since 2004.
I-2097, točka 20.
The Commission also disagrees with the Cypriot authorities that the entry of any competitor, either a low-cost or full-service airline, can be considered as an exceptional and unforeseeable circumstance, given that Cyprus Airways operates in a liberalised sector and provided that its competitors are operating legally.
Družba Cyprus Airways od prve polovice leta 2012 ni objavila finančnega poročila.
As regards the allegation that the Cypriot State is subsidising competitors of Cyprus Airways, the Commission did not receive any substantiation of this allegation.
Združeni zadevi T-102/07, Freistaat Sachsen proti Komisiji, in T-120/07, MB Immobilien in MB System proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
At any rate, the Commission stresses that it cannot be argued that the State needs to provide State aid to Cyprus Airways in order to offset the harmful effects of an alleged measure that the State is claimed to have introduced itself, and qualify the latter as exceptional and unforeseeable circumstance.
2010, str.
As regards the unrest in the Middle East, the Commission considers that such a situation cannot be considered as exceptional, given the persistent unrest in parts of the region for many decades.
II-585, točka 106.
Thus, even a significant drop in traffic would have a relatively small (even if ‘not negligible’) impact, that is to say it would affect at maximum 10 % of the total revenues of Cyprus Airways.
Glej sklep Komisije z dne 9. julija 2014 v zadevi SA.34191 (2012/C) v zvezi z ukrepi pomoči, ki jih je Latvija dodelila A/S Air Baltic Corporation (airBaltic), še neobjavljen, uvodna izjava 179; Sklep Komisije z dne 9. julija 2014 v zadevi SA.32715 (2012/C) v zvezi z družbo Adria Airways d.d., še neobjavljen, uvodna izjava 131; Sklep Komisije 2013/151/EU z dne 19. september 2012 o državni pomoči SA.30908 (11/C) (ex N 176/10), ki jo je Češka republika odobrila podjetju České aerolinie, a.s.
As regards the deterioration of the Greek and Cypriot economies, the Commission acknowledges those events, as well as the possible drop in the average fare for the Greek flights.
(ČSA – Czech Airlines – Načrt prestrukturiranja) (UL L 92, 3.4.2013, str. 16), uvodna izjava 107, in Sklep Komisije 2012/661/EU z dne 27. junij 2012 državni pomoči št.
However, the Commission recalls that Cyprus Airways expanded its domestic flights in Greece between 2011 and 2013, and was thus consciously increasing its exposure to the Greek market.
SA.33015 (2012/C), ki jo namerava Malta dodeliti za Air Malta plc.
The available evidence in the 2013 restructuring plan and the information provided by competitors suggests that the total passenger traffic in the Cypriot market has increased since 2009 while the market share of Cyprus Airways has been reduced.
(UL L 301, 30.10.2012, str. 29), uvodna izjava 93; Sklep Komisije z dne 29. julija 2014 v zadevi SA.36874 (2013/N) v zvezi s pomočjo za prestrukturiranje za LOT Polish Airlines S.A., še neobjavljen, uvodna izjava 241.
In addition, other airlines operating in the region have also been confronted with the economic crisis, but have adjusted their pricing policy and network, in order to remain in the market.
V Odločbi Komisije z dne 22. februarja 2006 v zadevi N464/2005 v zvezi s pomočjo za prestrukturiranje za AB Kauno ketaus liejykla, ki so jo navedli tudi ciprski organi, je Komisija odobrila daljše obdobje prestrukturiranja, med drugim zaradi 46-odstotnega zmanjšanja zmogljivosti.
In fact, Ryanair pointed that it has even achieved growth in those markets.
Družba Cyprus Airways pa bo svojo zmogljivost zmanjšala le za 35 %.
In the light of the above, the Commission considers that Cyprus Airways, despite acknowledging the risks through explicit, albeit ‘generic’, statements in the annual reports in 2007, 2008 and 2009, and despite the options available, failed to make the necessary adjustments to its business, in order to avoid the effect of the economic deterioration in its main markets and to profit from new markets, as its competitors did.
Glej na primer Sklep Komisije z dne 9. julija 2014 v zadevi SA.34191 (2012/C) v zvezi z ukrepi pomoči, ki jih je Latvija dodelila A/S Air Baltic Corporation (airBaltic), še neobjavljen, uvodna izjava 185; ali Sklep Komisije z dne 29. julija 2014 v zadevi SA.36874 (2013/N) v zvezi s pomočjo za prestrukturiranje za LOT Polish Airlines S.A, še neobjavljen, uvodna izjava 234.
Those effects can therefore not qualify as an exceptional and unforeseeable circumstance, but should rather be attributed to the poor management and performance of Cyprus Airways.
Popolnoma koordinirana letališča so opredeljena v členu 2(g) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 95/93 z dne 18. januarja 1993 o skupnih pravilih dodeljevanja slotov na letališčih Skupnosti (UL L 14, 22.1.1993, str. 1).
The Commission therefore concludes that the exception of point 73(c) of Section 3.3 of the 2004 Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines is not fulfilled and that restructuring aid to Cyprus Airways would breach the ‘one time, last time’ principle.
V skladu s členom 3(4) Uredbe (EGS) št. 95/93 so na navedenih letališčih vsaj v nekaterih obdobjih omejene zmogljivosti.
Conclusion
Glej Sklep Komisije z dne 9. julija 2014 v zadevi SA.34191 (2012/C) v zvezi z ukrepi pomoči, ki jih je Latvija dodelila A/S Air Baltic Corporation (airBaltic), še neobjavljen, uvodna izjava 194; Sklep Komisije z dne 9. julija 2014 v zadevi SA.32715 (2012/C) v zvezi z družbo Adria Airways d.d., še neobjavljen, uvodna izjava 143; Sklep 2013/151/EU, uvodna izjava 130.
In view of the above, the Commission finds that Cyprus has unlawfully implemented measures 1, 2, 4 and 5 in favour of Cyprus Airways, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Glej Sklep Komisije z dne 9. julija 2014 v zadevi SA.34191 (2012/C) v zvezi z ukrepi pomoči, ki jih je Latvija dodelila A/S Air Baltic Corporation (airBaltic), še neobjavljen, uvodna izjava 195; Sklep Komisije z dne 9. julija 2014 v zadevi SA.32715 (2012/C) v zvezi z družbo Adria Airways d.d., še neobjavljen, uvodna izjava 136.
The Commission also considers that measures 1, 2, 4 and 5 and the 2013 restructuring plan do not meet the conditions of the 2004 Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines.
Statut družbe Cyprus Airways in letni računovodski izkazi družbe kažejo, da družba upravlja številne pokojninske programe, vključno s podpornim skladom, in da prevzema odgovornost za ohranjanje vrednosti podpornega sklada, ta odgovornost pa je vključena v obveznosti in rezervacije družbe.
The Commission has not identified any other compatibility basis and the Cypriot authorities have also not claimed any alternative basis for compatibility of the measures (with the exception of the application of the GBER to the training aid — measure 5).
Poleg tega družba zagotavlja kupno moč pokojnin, tako da te niso nižje od najnižje določene skupne pokojnine.
Therefore, the Commission considers the aid to be incompatible with the internal market.
Glej Odločbo Komisije 2010/175/ES z dne 22. julija 2009 o državni pomoči C 18/05 (ex N 438/04, N 194/05 in PL 34/04) Poljske za Stocznia Gdańsk (UL L 81, 26.3.2010, str. 19), uvodna izjava 276.
RECOVERY
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 24. januarja 2006 v zadevi N 814/2006 o karti regionalnih pomoči za območja, ki prejemajo pomoč 2007–2013 (UL C 68, 24.3.2007, str. 28).
According to the Treaty and the Court’s established case-law, the Commission is competent to decide that the Member State concerned must abolish or alter aid when it has found that it is incompatible with the internal market.
Glej Sklep Komisije z dne 27. junija 2012 v zadevi SA.32523 (11/N), odstavek 11.
The Court has also consistently held that the obligation on a Member State to abolish aid regarded by the Commission as being incompatible with the internal market is designed to re-establish the previously existing situation.
Glej letno poročilo iz leta 2007, str. 97; letno poročilo iz leta 2008, str. 88, in letno poročilo iz leta 2009, str. 91.
In this context, the Court has established that this objective is attained once the recipient has repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to the payment of the aid is restored.
Glej zadevo C-70/72, Komisija proti Nemčiji, Recueil 1973, str. 813, točka 13.
In line with the case-law, Article 14(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 stated that ‘where negative decisions are taken in cases of unlawful aid, the Commission shall decide that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary […]’.
Glej združene zadeve C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1994, str.
Thus, given that the measures in question in the total amount of EUR 66 099 317,94 (EUR 31,33 million in the form of the State’s participation to the capital increase (measure 1), EUR 34,5 million in the form of the rescue aid loan (measure 2) and EUR 269 317,94 in the form of the training aid (measure 5)) were implemented in violation of Article 108 of the Treaty, and are to be considered as unlawful and incompatible aid, they must be recovered in order to re-establish the situation that existed on the market prior to their granting.
I-4103, točka 75.
Recovery should cover the time from when the advantage accrued to the beneficiary, that is to say when the aid was put at the disposal of the beneficiary, until effective recovery, and the sums to be recovered should therefore bear interest until effective recovery.
Glej zadevo C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str.
CONCLUSION
I-030671, točki 64 in 65.
As regards measure 3, the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty has become devoid of purpose due to the non-implementation of the measure by Cyprus.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
The Commission finds that measures 1, 2, 4 and 5 regarding the State’s participation to the capital increase, rescue aid loan, restructuring aid and training aid respectively, in favour of Cyprus Airways constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty and are incompatible with the internal market, because the relevant conditions of the 2004 Rescue and Restructuring Guidelines were not met and no other compatibility grounds were identified.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
As regards measures 1, 2, 4 and 5, the Commission finds that Cyprus has unlawfully implemented them in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 271/2008 z dne 30. januarja 2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 82, 25.3.2008, str. 1).
Finally, the Commission notes that Cyprus agreed to have the present decision adopted and notified in English.
Ta informacija se zagotovi v preglednici, priloženi kot Priloga k temu sklepu.
Article 1
INFORMACIJE O ZNESKIH PREJETE POMOČI, POMOČI, KI JO JE TREBA VRNITI, IN POMOČI, KI JE BILA ŽE VRNJENA (VSI ZNESKI V EUR)
The formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) of the Treaty initiated on 6 March 2013 in respect to potential ex gratia compensation by Cyprus to Cyprus Airways has become devoid of purpose, because Cyprus has abandoned the measure.
Identiteta upravičenca – ukrep
Article 2
Skupni znesek pomoči, ki jo je treba vrniti
The State aid amounting to at least EUR 66 099 317,94, which results from the sum of EUR 31,33 million in the form of the State’s participation to the capital increase, EUR 34,5 million in the form of the rescue aid loan and EUR 269 317,94 in the form of the training aid, unlawfully granted to Cyprus Airways by Cyprus in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty, is incompatible with the internal market.
(Glavnica)
Article 3
Skupni znesek pomoči, ki je bila že vrnjena
Any State aid in addition to the amounts referred to in Article 2 which Cyprus has granted or might want to grant to Cyprus Airways in the context of measure 4 is incompatible with the internal market.
Glavnica
Article 4
Obresti za vračilo
Cyprus shall recover the incompatible aid referred to in Article 2 from the beneficiary.
Družba Cyprus Airways – udeležba države pri povečanju kapitala
It shall also recover any additional aid as referred to in Article 3 from the beneficiary.
Družba Cyprus Airways – posojilo za reševanje
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiary until their actual recovery.
Družba Cyprus Airways – pomoč za usposabljanje
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004, and to Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
[Prosimo, dopolnite, če je bila v okviru ukrepa 4 dodeljena katera koli druga pomoč]
As regards measure 4, Cyprus shall inform the Commission whether it has granted any additional amounts above those referred to in Article 2 in the context of this measure and shall also inform the Commission about the exact amounts granted and granting dates.
Znesek iz uvodne izjave 110 Sklepa.
Cyprus shall abolish measure 4 and cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 2 and 3 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Znesek iz uvodne izjave 117 Sklepa.
Article 5 1.
Ciprski organi so nanje odgovorili 6. aprila 2012 in 30. avgusta 2012.
2.
Komisija je pripombe ciprskih organov prejela 31. maja 2013.
Cyprus shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
Komisija je v obdobju od 4. aprila do 3. julija 2013 prejela pripombe petih zainteresiranih strani.
Article 6 1.
Pripombe ciprskih organov na pripombe, ki so jih poslale zainteresirane strani, pa je prejela 10. septembra 2013.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Cyprus shall submit the following information:
Komisija je z dopisi z dne 3. decembra 2012, 15. februarja 2013 in 6. maja 2013 zaprosila za informacije, med drugim o pomoči za usposabljanje za družbo Cyprus Airway (SA.38225).
Information requested under Article 4 paragraphs 4 and 5;
Ciprski organi so nanje odgovorili 19. decembra 2012, 14. marca 2013 in 30. maja 2013.
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from the beneficiary;
Komisija je pripombe ciprskih organov prejela 31. marca 2014.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
Pripombe treh zainteresiranih strani je prejela 16. marca 2014.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
Družba Cyprus Airways je bila do sredine leta 2013 dejavna tudi na notranjih letih na grškem trgu.
Cyprus shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 2 and Article 3 has been completed.
Tudi nekatere proge na Bližnji vzhod so za družbo Cyprus Airways pomenile tradicionalne trge.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
V obdobju od septembra do decembra 2012 je država družbi Cyprus Airways izplačala 31,33 milijona EUR v obliki predplačil za načrtovano povečanje delniškega kapitala v skupnem znesku 45 milijonov EUR.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
Znesek je bil plačan v tranšah.
Article 7
Ciprski organi so predvidevali, da bo do povečanja kapitala prišlo s sorazmernim povečanjem kapitala zasebnih delničarjev, in sicer za dodatnega 13,67 milijona EUR.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Cyprus.
Vendar so zasebni delničarji prispevali le 106 000 EUR, zato se je delniški kapital družbe povečal za samo 31,4 milijona EUR.
Done at Brussels, 9 January 2015.
Državne delnice v družbi Cyprus Airways so se tako z 69,62 % povečale na 93,67 %.
For the Commission
Ciprski organi so 13. decembra 2012 družbi Cyprus Airways priglasili pomoč za reševanje v višini 73 milijonov EUR.
Member of the Commission
Kot so v priglasitvi navedli ciprski organi, je znesek izražal potrebe družbe Cyprus Airways po neto denarnem toku do 30. junija 2013, tj. za šest mesecev.
SA.35888: OJ C 152, 30.5.2013, p. 12; SA.37220 and SA.38225: OJ C 117, 16.4.2014, p. 125.
tranše posojila za reševanje, ki je bilo družbi Cyprus Airways (ukrep 2) že dodeljeno v skupnem znesku 34,5 milijona EUR.
Cf. footnote 1.
Dodeljenega zneska družba Cyprus Airways ne bi vrnila, ustrezni dolg pa bi se preoblikoval v lastniški kapital;
SA.27573 (2012/MX) — Scheme for constant training programmes for individual enterprises — Cyprus, approved in Cyprus by the Decision of the Commissioner for State Aid Control, published in the Cypriot Official Gazette nr.
To posojilo je družba Cyprus Airways redno vračala v dveh letnih obrokih, avgusta 2013 pa je neporavnani znesek za plačilo znašal 28,5 milijona EUR.
8025 of 21 November 2008.
Kot izhaja iz priglašene pomoči za prestrukturiranje, družba neporavnanega zneska banki Hellenic Bank naj ne bi poplačala.
Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).
Družba je že sprejela nekatere predvidene ukrepe v skladu z načrtom prestrukturiranja iz leta 2013.
Commission decision of 3 May 2005 in case N69/2005 (OJ C 191, 5.8.2005, p. 4) and Commission Decision 2008/137/EC of 7 March 2007 — State aid C 10/06 (ex N555/05) — Cyprus Airways Public Ltd — Restructuring plan (OJ L 49, 22.2.2008, p. 25).
Prestrukturiranje flot in poslovanja
Commission decision of 27 June 2012 in case SA.32523 (11/N) (OJ C 230, 1.8.2012, p. 1).
V načrtu prestrukturiranja iz leta 2013 je bilo predvideno zmanjšanje flote na šest letal (s 13 letal v začetku aprila 2012).
ATH: Athens; SKG: Thessaloniki; HER: Heraklion-Crete; RHO-Rhodes; LED: St. Petersburg.
To zmanjšanje je bilo doseženo 10. decembra 2013 s prodajo dveh letal v lasti družbe aprila 2012 in iztekom pogodb o najemu petih letal.
FCO: Rome Fiumicino; VIE: Vienna, LHR: London Heathrow, STN: London-Stansted.
Pet letal od preostale flote šestih letal, ki jih je družba Cyprus Airways najela, bi še naprej delovalo, eno letalo, ki je v lasti družbe, pa bi bilo nadomestno.
LON: Collectively referred to airports in the London area.
Kar zadeva nove pobude v zvezi s prihodki, je bilo v načrtu prestrukturiranja iz leta 2013 v osnovnem scenariju predvideno povišanje cen vozovnic za 2–3 % na leto od leta 2015.
AMS: Amsterdam Schiphol; CDG: Paris Charles de Gaulle; SVO: Moscow Sheremetyevo; SOF: Sofia; FRA: Frankfurt am Main; MUC: Munich; ZRH: Zurich; TLV: Tel Aviv; BEY: Beirut.
Kot scenarij za slab primer je bilo v načrtu prestrukturiranja iz leta 2013 predvideno enoodstotno znižanje cen v letu 2014 brez dodatnega povišanja cen po letu 2015.
Available seat kilometres.
Poleg tega se je v načrtu sklicevalo na dodatne prihodke iz dodatnih storitev za potnike, vendar niso bili navedeni nobeni zneski.
The 2013 restructuring plan considered routes which have positive gross contribution to the company’s costs, that is to say. revenue minus variable cost, to be profitable routes.
Ponovna vzpostavitev uspešnega poslovanja – predpostavke
Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Article 87 and 88 of the Treaty (OJ L 214, 9.8.2008, p. 3).
V načrtu prestrukturiranja iz leta 2013 je bila predvidena ponovna vzpostavitev uspešnega poslovanja družbe od leta 2014.