natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They will in any case be made individually aware through the fact that they have to contribute to a fund which provides for aid to film distribution.
Poleg tega ne upošteva dejstva, da ponudniki videoposnetkov na zahtevo producirajo tudi filme, ki so upravičeni do pomoči.
Furthermore, aid is granted on application only, and their applications will be treated exactly like those of German companies.
Združljivost z Direktivo 2010/13/EU
The selection board is bound to assess the application exclusively on the basis of the cultural quality of the films for which the aid is requested.
Zastavlja se vprašanje, ali zadevni davek, ki se obračuna na storitve za nemško občinstvo, spada na področje uporabe Direktive 2010/13/EU.
Therefore, the place of establishment of the distributor is not among the criteria which the selection board may apply when taking a decision.
Zadevni davek prispeva v javni sklad FFA, ki je namenjen spodbujanju različnih kulturnih ciljev v avdiovizualnem sektorju.
The foreign providers of German language films also benefit indirectly in the same way as their German competitors from the support of film production in Germany.
30 % prihodkov od davka bo namenjenih podpori filmski distribuciji z videoposnetki ali videoposnetki na zahtevo.
This support ensures a constant supply of German-funded films which the foreign providers may include in their offer.
Preostanek bo skupaj s prispevki iz kinematografov in televizijskih postaj bolj na splošno prispeval k podpori filmske produkcije ali distribucije prek drugih kanalov.
This is evidenced by the fact that their catalogues contain a share of German films which is comparable to the catalogues of domestic providers.
Člen 13(1) Direktive 2010/13/EU zajema ukrepe, ki so povezani s spodbujanjem evropskih del s strani avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev in določa, da država članica, ki ima pristojnost nad ponudnikom tovrstnih storitev, spodbujanje zagotavlja.
Company X put forward the argument that domestic VoD providers would be less affected by the tax because some of them are vertically integrated VoD and TV or cable operators which may also benefit from production aid.
To je mogoče doseči na primer s finančnim prispevkom, ki bi ga tovrstne storitve namenile produkciji evropskih del.
This argument does not take into account that the differentiation between integrated and non-integrated undertakings has nothing to do with the place of establishment.
Dejstvo, da obravnavani davek prispeva k financiranju javnega organa, čigar obveznost je, med drugim, da podpira produkcijo in distribucijo evropskih del, sproža dvome glede tega, če lahko sodi v okvir člena 13(1) Direktive 2010/13/EU.
There would also be different effects among German TV and VoD providers.
Člen 13(1) Direktive 2010/13/EU ne opredeljuje, ali mora spodbujanje evropskih del potekati brez posredovanja strank, razen samega ponudnika storitev na zahtevo.
It furthermore overlooks the fact that VoD providers are also producing films eligible for aid.
Poleg tega bi lahko uporaba obravnavanega davka za storitve, ki so usmerjene iz ene države članice na trg druge države članice, postavila pod vprašaj načelo, da ima država članica, v kateri ima ponudnik medijskih storitev sedež, pristojnost nad ponudnikom, kot je določeno v členu 2(2)a Direktive 2010/13/EU.
Compatibility with Directive 2010/13/EU
Predlagana je bila sprememba Direktive 2010/13/EU, da bi se zagotovilo, da direktiva ustrezno zagotavlja razvoj trga na področju avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, tako linearnih kot nelinearnih.
The question arises whether the tax concerned, which by its design is imposed on services targeted at an audience in Germany, would fall within the scope of Directive 2010/13.
Predlagana sprememba člena 13 zlasti pojasnjuje, da imajo države članice pravico od ponudnikov avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev na zahtevo, usmerjenih v občinstvo na njihovih ozemljih, vendar s sedežem v drugih državah članicah, zahtevati tovrstne finančne prispevke.
The tax in question contributes to a public fund, the FFA, which is used to promote various cultural objectives in the audiovisual sector.
V tem primeru predlagana sprememba predvideva, da morajo finančni prispevki temeljiti samo na prihodkih, zasluženih v ciljni državi članici.
30 % of the funds generated by the tax will be earmarked for the support of the distribution of films by video or video on demand.
Če država članica, v kateri ima ponudnik sedež, naloži finančni prispevek, mora upoštevati kakršen koli finančni prispevek, naložen s strani ciljne države članice.
The remainder will, together with the contributions from cinemas and broadcasters, more generally contribute to the support of film production or distribution via other channels.
Komisija meni, da je bilo v predlaganem besedilu člena 13 Direktive 2010/13/EU pojasnjeno kaj bi že bilo možno v skladu s trenutno veljavno direktivo.
Article 13(1) of Directive 2010/13/EU is intended to cover measures which are linked to the promotion of European works by on-demand audiovisual media services and provides that the Member State having jurisdiction over the provider of such services ensures that promotion.
Člena, tudi kadar se uporablja za namene tega sklepa, ne gre razumeti kot pripisovanja izključne pristojnosti državi članici, v kateri ima ponudnik sedež, za obdavčitev ponudnikov medijskih storitev na zahtevo, ki bi prispevali k produkciji in pridobitvi pravic do evropskih del ali deležu in/ali pomenu evropskih del v katalogu programov, ki ga ponuja avdiovizualna medijska storitev na zahtevo.
The fact that the tax under consideration serves to contribute to funding a public body which, as only one task among others, has the obligation to support the production and distribution of European works, raises doubts as to whether it may fall under Article 13(1) of Directive 2010/13/EU.
Poleg tega je obdavčitev ponudnikov avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev na zahtevo le primer ukrepa, ki ga lahko sprejmejo pristojne države članice.
Article 13(1) of Directive 2010/13/EU does not specify whether the promotion of European works must take place without the intervention of parties other than the on-demand services provider itself.
Razlaga, po kateri načelo države izvora, kot je določeno v členu 2(1) Direktive 2010/13/EU velja za davek, kot v tem primeru, privede do situacije, v kateri za ponudnike, ki delujejo na istem trgu, ne veljajo enake obveznosti.
Furthermore, the application of a tax such as the one in question to services targeted from one Member State to the market in another Member State could raise the question whether such tax would not call into doubt the principle that the Member State where a media service provider is established has jurisdiction over the provider, as laid down in Article 2(2)a of Directive 2010/13/EU.
Razlaga, na podlagi katere bi država članica ponudnike videoposnetkov na zahtevo, namenjenih njenemu občinstvu, vendar s sedežem v drugi državi članici, oprostila prispevka za spodbujanje evropskih del, bi diskriminirala ponudnike s sedežem v prvi državi članici, ki so obdavčeni medtem ko konkurirajo na istem trgu.
An amendment of Directive 2010/13/EU has been proposed in order to ensure that the Directive appropriately caters for market developments regarding audiovisual media services, both linear and non-linear.
Poleg tega na dan začetka veljavnosti Direktive 2010/13/EU, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 28, še ni bilo jasno za koliko bi se povečal obseg tržnega deleža čezmejnega opravljanja storitev videoposnetkov na zahtevo in posledično tudi njegov pomen za prispevek v filmski sklad.
The proposal for such amendment was adopted by the Commission on 25 May 2016 [12].
Komisija zlasti ugotavlja, da ukrep iz uradnega obvestila Nemčije izrecno omejuje prihodke, ki so predmet davka, na prihodke, pridobljene v ciljni državi članici, in v kolikor še niso predmet prispevka v državi članici, kjer imajo sedež.
It clarifies that Member States have the right to require providers of on-demand audiovisual media services under their jurisdiction to contribute financially to the production of European works.
Kot posledica tega veljavnost obdavčitve nekaterih ponudnikov videoposnetkov na zahtevo, ki zagotavljajo svoje storitve iz lokacije zunaj Nemčije, ne postavlja pod vprašaj Direktive 2010/13/EU.
The proposed amendment of Article 13 clarifies in particular that Member States have the right to require providers of on-demand audiovisual media services, targeting audiences in their territories, but established in other Member States, to make such financial contributions.
SKLEPNA UGOTOVITEV
In this case, the proposed amendment foresees that financial contributions shall be based only on the revenues earned in the targeted Member State.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da je sprememba sheme pomoči FFG, ki jo namerava Nemčija izvajati za financiranje distribucije filma s strani ponudnikov videoposnetkov na zahtevo, v skladu s členoma 107(3)(d) in 110 Pogodbe in da se prav tako ne krši Direktive 2010/13/EU –
If the Member State where the provider is established imposes a financial contribution, it shall take into account any financial contribution imposed by targeted Member States.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
The Commission considers the proposed wording of Article 13 of Directive 2010/13/EU as a clarification of what could already be possible under the Directive currently in force.
Člen 1
This article, also when applied for the purpose of this Decision, could not be considered as attributing an exclusive competence to the Member State where the provider is established for the taxation of on-demand media service providers so as to contribute to the production and rights acquisition of European works or to the share and/or prominence of European works in the catalogue of programmes offered by the on-demand audiovisual media service.
Ukrep, ki ga Nemčija namerava izvajati s Filmförderungsgesetz in der Fassung des Siebten Änderungsgesetzes je združljiv z notranjim trgom v smislu člena 107(3)(d) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Indeed, its wording is not categorical and unreserved.
V skladu s tem se izvajanje ukrepa odobri.
Furthermore the taxation of on-demand audiovisual media services providers is only an example of measures which can be taken by the Member State which has jurisdiction.
Člen 2
An interpretation according to which the country of origin principle, as laid down in Article 2(1) of Directive 2010/13/EU, applies to a tax such as the one in question, leads to situations in which providers active on the same market are not subject to the same obligations.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo.
In fact, an interpretation which would require a Member State to exempt VoD providers specifically targeting its audience but being established in another Member State from a contribution to the promotion of European works would discriminate against providers established in the former Member State which are subjected to a tax, while they are competing on the same market.
V Bruslju, 1. septembra 2016
Furthermore, the extent, to which the importance of the market share of the cross-border provision of videos on demand would grow, and accordingly its significance for the contribution to film funds, was not yet evident on the date of entry into force of Directive 2010/13/EU, as described in recital 28.
Za Komisijo
The Commission notes in particular that the measure notified by Germany explicitly limits the revenues subject to the tax to revenues made in the targeted Member State, and only to the extent that they are not already subject to a contribution in the Member State of establishment.
Članica Komisije
As a consequence, the validity of the application of the tax to certain VoD providers which provide their services from locations outside Germany is not called into question by Directive 2010/13/EU in particular.
UL C 437, 5.12.2014, str. 57,
CONCLUSION
Glej opombo 1.
The Commission therefore concludes that the amendment to the aid scheme FFG which Germany is planning to implement for the funding of film distribution by VoD providers is compatible with Articles 107(3)(d) and 110 of the Treaty and does also not infringe Directive 2010/13/EU,
Davek za video industrijo znaša 1,8 % za promet do 30 milijonov EUR; 2,0 % za promet med 30 milijoni EUR in 60 milijoni EUR; 2,3 % za promet nad60 milijonov EUR.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Odločba Komisije z dne 3. decembra 2013 v zadevi državne pomoči SA.36753 – Nemčija, Filmförderungsgesetz, ob sklicevanju na točke 80 – 95 Odločbe Komisije z dne 10. decembra 2008 v zadevi N 477/2008 – Nemčija, Nemška shema pomoči za filmsko industrijo.
Article 1
Sodba Regie Networks, C-333/07, EU:C:2008:764, odstavek 99; sodba z dne 11. julija 2014, DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital proti Komisiji, T-533/10, ZOdl., v pritožbenem postopku, EU:T:2014:629, odstavek 51, in sodba Telefónica de España et Telefónica Móviles España proti Komisiji, T-151/11, ZOdl., v pritožbenem postopku, EU:T:2014:631, odstavek 101.
The measure which Germany is planning to implement with the Filmförderungsgesetz in der Fassung des Siebten Änderungsgesetzes is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(d) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Sodbi DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital proti Komisiji, opomba 5 zgoraj, EU:T:2014:629, odstavek 50, in Telefónica de España et Telefónica Móviles España proti Komisiji, opomba 5 zgoraj, EU:T:2014:631, odstavek 100.
Implementation of the measure is accordingly authorised.
Direktiva 2010/13/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 10. marca 2010 o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev (Direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah) (UL L 95, 15.4.2010, str. 1).
Article 2
Odločba Komisije 2000/116/ES v zadevi C-34/97, Nizozemska – Parafiskalne dajatve za promocijo okrasnih rastlin, UL L 34, 9.2.2000, str. 20, odstavek 63.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Evropski avdiovizualni observatorij – Trendi prihodkov videoposnetkov na zahtevo, str. 3–4, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/study-data-and-information-costs-and-benefits-audiovisual-media-service-directive-avmsd.
Done at Brussels, 1 September 2016.
(COM(2014) 272 final, strani 4–5) „Glede prisotnosti evropskih filmov je iz razpoložljivih podatkov razvidno, da globalni akter (prisoten v 26 državah EU) predlaga, da se v glavnih domačih trgovinah ponudi več filmskih uspešnic iz EU in dobitnikov evropskih filmskih nagrad, kot jih ponujajo nacionalni ponudniki videoposnetkov na zahtevo“.
For the Commission
Glej opombo 4.
Member of the Commission
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2010/13/EU o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev glede na spreminjajoče se tržne razmere, COM/2016/0287 final, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016PC0287&from=EN.
OJ C 437, 5.12.2014, p.
Komisija jo je odobrila do 31. decembra 2016 s sklepom v zadevi SA.36753 z dne 3. decembra 2013.
57.
Predvidena priglašena sprememba sheme zadeva financiranje in davek na storitve ponudnikov videoposnetkov na zahtevo brez podjetja ali agencije v Nemčiji.
Cf. footnote 1
Priglašen ukrep naj bi veljal od trenutka odobritve s strani Komisije do 31. decembra 2016.
The tax for the video industry amounts to 1,8 % in case of a turnover up to EUR 30 million; to 2,0 % for a turnover between EUR 30 million and EUR 60 million; to 2,3 % in the case of a turnover above EUR 60 million.
Ocenjen letni znesek razpoložljivih sredstev iz prihodkov od davka na ponudbo videoposnetkov je 13 milijonov EUR.
Commission Decision of 3 December 2013 in State aid case SA.36753 — Germany, Filmförderungsgesetz, referring to paragraphs 80-95 of the Commission Decision of 10 December 2008 in case N 477/2008 — Germany, German Film Support Scheme,.
Predviden ukrep – financiranje in davek na storitve ponudnikov videoposnetkov na zahtevo brez sedeža ali agencije v Nemčiji – predstavlja spremembo sheme, ki jo je Komisija odobrila do 31. decembra 2016.
Judgment in,Regie Networks, C-333/07, EU:C:2008:764, paragraph 99; Judgment of 11 July 2014, DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital v Commission, T-533/10, ECR, Appeal pending, EU:T:2014:629, paragraph 51, and Judgment in Telefónica de España et Telefónica Móviles España v Commission, T-151/11, ECR, Appeal pending, EU:T:2014:631, paragraph 101.
Merila za oceno državne pomoči se od prejšnje odobritve sheme niso spremenila in predlagana sprememba se nanaša samo na pomoč distribuciji filmov in davek od tujih distributerjev videoposnetkov na zahtevo.
Judgments in DTS Distribuidora de Televisión Digital v Commission, footnote 5 above, EU:T:2014:629, paragraph 50, and in Telefónica de España et Telefónica Móviles España v Commission, footnote 5 above, EU:T:2014:631, paragraph 100.
Leta 2014 je bil trg videoposnetkov na zahtevo v EU vreden 2,501 milijarde EUR, kar predstavlja povečanje za 272 % od leta 2010.
Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) (OJ L 95, 15.4.2010, p.
V Nemčiji je bil trg videoposnetkov na zahtevo leta 2014 vreden 315,2 milijona EUR, kar predstavlja povečanje za 172 % od leta 2010 [9].
1).
Predviden ukrep – financiranje in davek od storitev ponudnikov videoposnetkov na zahtevo brez sedeža ali agencije v Nemčiji – predstavlja spremembo sheme, ki jo je Komisija odobrila do 31. decembra 2016.
Commission Decision 2000/116/EC in Case C-34/97, Netherlands — parafiscal charges for promoting ornamental plants, OJ L 34, 9.2.2000, p.
Merila za oceno državne pomoči niso spremenila glede na prejšnjo odobritev.
20, paragraph 63.
Predlog za takšno spremembo je Komisija sprejela 25. maja 2016 [12].
European Audiovisual Observatory — Trends in Video-on-Demand revenues, p.
Pojasnjuje, da imajo države članice pravico od ponudnikov avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev na zahtevo v njihovi pristojnosti zahtevati, da finančno prispevajo k produkciji evropskih del.
Council Decision (EU) 2016/2044
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/2044
of 18 November 2016
z dne 18. novembra 2016
on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the People's Republic of China on the short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic passports
o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko o odpravi vizumske obveznosti za kratkoročno bivanje za imetnike diplomatskih potnih listov v imenu Evropske unije
The Commission has negotiated on behalf of the European Union an agreement with the People's Republic of China on the short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic passports (the ‘Agreement’).
Komisija je v imenu Evropske unije s pogajanji dosegla Sporazum z Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko o odpravi vizumske obveznosti za kratkoročno bivanje za imetnike diplomatskih potnih listov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum).
In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2016/431 [2], the Agreement has been signed and is applied on a provisional basis as from 3 March 2016.
Sporazum je bil podpisan v skladu s Sklepom Sveta (EU) 2016/431 [2] in se začasno uporablja od 3. marca 2016.
The Agreement sets up a Joint Committee of experts for the management of the Agreement.
S Sporazumom se ustanovi skupni odbor strokovnjakov za upravljanje Sporazuma.
The Union is to be represented within that Joint Committee by the Commission, which should be assisted by the representatives of the Member States.
Unijo v skupnem odboru zastopa Komisija, ki bi ji morali pomagati predstavniki držav članic.
This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC [3]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, v katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES [3]; Združeno kraljestvo torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanj ni zavezujoč in se v njem ne uporablja.
This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC [4]; Ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, v katerem Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES [4]; Irska torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
The Agreement between the European Union and the People's Republic of China on the short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic passports is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.
Sporazum med Evropsko unijo in Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko o odpravi vizumske obveznosti za kratkoročno bivanje za imetnike diplomatskih potnih listov se odobri v imenu Unije.
The President of the Council shall give, on behalf of the Union, the notification provided for in Article 10(1) of the Agreement [5].Article 3
Predsednik Sveta v imenu Unije pošlje uradno obvestilo iz člena 10(1) Sporazuma [5].Člen 3
The Commission, assisted by the representatives of the Member States, shall represent the Union within the Joint Committee of experts set up pursuant to Article 7 of the Agreement.
Komisija ob pomoči predstavnikov držav članic zastopa Unijo v skupnem odboru strokovnjakov, ustanovljenem v skladu s členom 7 Sporazuma.
Done at Brussels, 18 November 2016.
V Bruslju, 18. novembra 2016
Consent given on 25 October 2016 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Odobritev z dne 25. oktobra 2016 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Council Decision (EU) 2016/431 of 12 February 2016 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Agreement between the European Union and the People's Republic of China on the short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic passports (OJ L 76, 23.3.2016, p. 17).
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/431 z dne 12. februarja 2016 o podpisu, v imenu Evropske unije, in začasni uporabi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko o odpravi vizumske obveznosti za kratkoročno bivanje za imetnike diplomatskih potnih listov (UL L 76, 23.3.2016, str.
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2047
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/2047
on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to DNA data in Denmark
o začetku avtomatizirane izmenjave podatkov o DNK na Danskem
Article 20 of Council Decision 2008/616/JHA [3] provides that the verification that the above condition has been met with respect to automated data exchange in accordance with Chapter 2 of Decision 2008/615/JHA is to be done on the basis of an evaluation report based on a questionnaire, an evaluation visit and a pilot run.
Člen 20 Sklepa Sveta 2008/616/PNZ [3] določa, da se preverjanje, ali je zgoraj navedeni pogoj v zvezi z avtomatizirano izmenjavo podatkov v skladu s poglavjem 2 Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ izpolnjen ali ne, opravi na podlagi poročila o oceni, ki je oprto na vprašalnik, evalvacijski obisk in preskus.
Denmark has informed the General Secretariat of the Council on the national DNA analysis files to which Articles 2 to 6 of Decision 2008/615/JHA apply and the conditions for automated searching as referred to in Article 3(1) of that Decision in accordance with Article 36(2) of that Decision.
Danska je v skladu s členom 36(2) Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ obvestila generalni sekretariat Sveta o nacionalnih zbirkah podatkov o preiskavah DNK, za katere se uporabljajo členi 2 do 6 navedenega sklepa, ter o pogojih za avtomatizirano iskanje iz člena 3(1) navedenega sklepa.
Denmark has completed the questionnaire on data protection and the questionnaire on DNA data exchange.
Danska je izpolnila vprašalnik o varstvu podatkov in vprašalnik o izmenjavi podatkov o DNK.