natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Council Directive 2002/53/EC of 13 June 2002 on the common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species (OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 1).
Direktiva Sveta 2002/56/ES z dne 13. junija 2002 o trženju semenskega krompirja (UL L 193, 20.7.2002, str. 60).
Council Directive 2002/54/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of beet seed (OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 12).
Direktiva Sveta 2002/57/ES z dne 13. junija 2002 o trženju semena oljnic in predivnic (UL L 193, 20.7.2002, str. 74).
Council Directive 2002/55/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of vegetable seed (OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 33).
Direktiva Sveta 2008/90/ES z dne 29. septembra 2008 o trženju razmnoževalnega materiala sadnih rastlin in sadnih rastlin, namenjenih za pridelavo sadja (UL L 267, 8.10.2008, str. 8).
Council Directive 2002/56/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed potatoes (OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 60).
Priporočilo Komisije z dne 13. julija 2010 o smernicah za razvoj nacionalnih ukrepov soobstoja za preprečevanje nenamerne prisotnosti GSO v konvencionalnih in ekoloških pridelkih (UL C 200, 22.7.2010, str. 1).
Council Directive 2002/57/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 74).
Direktiva 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov o storitvah informacijske družbe (UL L 204, 21.7.1998, str. 37).
Council Directive 2008/90/EC of 29 September 2008 on the marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production (OJ L 267, 8.10.2008, p. 8).
Uredba (ES) št. 1830/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. septembra 2003 o sledljivosti in označevanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov ter sledljivosti živil in krme, proizvedenih iz gensko spremenjenih organizmov, ter o spremembi Direktive 2001/18/ES (UL L 268, 18.10.2003, str. 24).
Commission Recommendation of 13 July 2010 on guidelines for the development of national co-existence measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in conventional and organic crop (OJ C 200, 22.7.2010, p. 1).
Ti razlogi so lahko povezani s cilji okoljske ali kmetijske politike ali drugimi tehtnimi razlogi, kot so prostorsko načrtovanje, raba zemljišč, socialno-ekonomski vplivi, soobstoj in javni red.
Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services (OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37).
Ti razlogi se lahko navajajo posamično ali skupaj, glede na posebne okoliščine v zadevni državi članici, regiji ali območju, kjer se bodo ti ukrepi uporabljali.
Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 24).
Od 2. aprila 2015 do 3. oktobra 2015 lahko država članica zahteva, da se prilagodi geografsko področje uporabe iz prijave/vloge, ki je bila vložena, ali odobritve, ki je bila izdana, na podlagi te direktive ali Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 pred 2. aprilom 2015.
Directive (EU) 2015/413 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva (EU) 2015/413 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences
o lažji čezmejni izmenjavi informacij o prometnih prekrških, povezanih z varnostjo v cestnem prometu
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 91(1)(c) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 91(1)(c) Pogodbe,
The Union is pursuing a policy to improve road safety with the objective of reducing fatalities, injuries and material damage.
Unija izvaja politiko povečanja varnosti v cestnem prometu s ciljem zmanjšati število smrtnih žrtev in poškodb ter materialno škodo.
However, due to a lack of appropriate procedures and notwithstanding existing possibilities under Council Decision 2008/615/JHA [3] and Council Decision 2008/616/JHA [4] (the ‘Prüm Decisions’), sanctions in the form of financial penalties for certain road traffic offences are often not enforced if those offences are committed with a vehicle which is registered in a Member State other than the Member State where the offence took place.
Vendar zaradi pomanjkanja ustreznih postopkov in ne glede na obstoječe možnosti na podlagi Sklepa Sveta 2008/615/PNZ [3] in Sklepa Sveta 2008/616/PNZ [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prümska sklepa) sankcije v obliki denarnih kazni za nekatere cestnoprometne prekrške, ki so bili storjeni v eni državi članici z vozilom, ki je registrirano v drugi državi članici, pogosto niso izvršene.
This Directive aims to ensure that even in such cases, the effectiveness of the investigation of road-safety-related traffic offences should be ensured.
Namen te direktive je zagotoviti, da bi se tudi v takih primerih zagotovila učinkovitost preiskovanja prometnih prekrškov, povezanih z varnostjo v cestnem prometu.
In its communication of 20 July 2010 entitled ‘Towards a European road safety area: policy orientations on road safety 2011-2020’, the Commission emphasised that enforcement of road traffic rules remains a key factor in creating the conditions for a considerable reduction in the number of deaths and injuries.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu z dne 20. julija 2010 z naslovom „Evropski prostor varnosti v cestnem prometu: usmeritve politike na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu v obdobju 2011–2020“ poudarila, da je izvrševanje cestnoprometnih predpisov še naprej glavni dejavnik pri ustvarjanju pogojev za znatno zmanjšanje števila smrtnih žrtev in poškodb.
In its conclusions of 2 December 2010 on road safety, the Council called for consideration of the need for further strengthening of enforcement of road traffic rules by Member States and, where appropriate, at Union level.
Svet je v svojih sklepih o varnosti v cestnem prometu z dne 2. decembra 2010 pozval k preučitvi potrebe po dodatni okrepitvi izvrševanja cestnoprometnih predpisov s strani držav članic in, kjer je to ustrezno, tudi na ravni Unije.
It invited the Commission to examine the possibilities of harmonising traffic rules at Union level where appropriate and adopting further measures on facilitating cross-border enforcement with regard to road traffic offences, in particular those related to serious traffic accidents.
Komisijo je pozval, naj po potrebi preuči možnosti za harmonizacijo prometnih predpisov na ravni Unije in sprejetje nadaljnjih ukrepov za lažji čezmejni pregon v zvezi s cestnoprometnimi prekrški, zlasti ob hudih prometnih nesrečah.
The judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 May 2014 in Case C-43/12 [6] annulled Directive 2011/82/EU on the grounds that it could not validly be adopted on the basis of Article 87(2) TFEU.
Da bi izboljšali varnost v cestnem prometu v celotni Uniji in zagotovili enako obravnavo voznikov, in sicer rezidenčnih in nerezidenčnih storilcev prekrškov, bi bilo treba olajšati pregon ne glede na državo članico, v kateri je vozilo registrirano.
The judgment maintained the effects of Directive 2011/82/EU until the entry into force within a reasonable period of time — which is not to exceed 12 months as from the date of delivery of the judgment — of a new directive based on Article 91(1)(c) TFEU.
Zato bi bilo treba za nekatere ugotovljene prometne prekrške, povezane z varnostjo v cestnem prometu, uporabljati sistem čezmejne izmenjave informacij – ne glede na to, ali so ti prekrški po zakonodaji zadevne države članice upravne ali kazenske narave – ki bi državi članici prekrška omogočil dostop do podatkov iz registra vozil države članice registracije.
Therefore a new Directive should be adopted on the basis of that Article.
Učinkovitejša čezmejna izmenjava podatkov iz registrov vozil, ki naj bi olajšala identifikacijo oseb, osumljenih storitve prometnih prekrškov, povezanih z varnostjo v cestnem prometu, bi lahko povečala odvračilni učinek in spodbudila previdnejše ravnanje voznika vozila, ki je registrirano v državi članici, ki ni država članica prekrška, s čimer bi se preprečile žrtve, ki so posledica prometnih nesreč.
Greater convergence of control measures between Member States should be encouraged and the Commission should examine in this respect the need for developing common standards for automatic checking equipment for road safety controls.
Prometni prekrški, povezani z varnostjo v cestnem prometu, ki so zajeti v tej direktivi, v državah članicah niso enako obravnavani.
The awareness of Union citizens should be raised as regards the road safety traffic rules in force in different Member States and as regards the implementation of this Directive, in particular through appropriate measures guaranteeing the provision of sufficient information on the consequences of not respecting the road safety traffic rules when travelling in a Member State other than the Member State of registration.
Nekatere države članice take prekrške po nacionalni zakonodaji opredeljujejo kot „upravne“ prekrške, druge države članice pa kot „kazniva“ dejanja.
In order to improve road safety throughout the Union and to ensure equal treatment of drivers, namely resident and non-resident offenders, enforcement should be facilitated irrespective of the Member State of registration of the vehicle.
To direktivo bi bilo treba uporabljati ne glede na opredelitev teh prekrškov po nacionalni zakonodaji.
To this end, a system of cross-border exchange of information should be used for certain identified road-safety-related traffic offences, regardless of their administrative or criminal nature under the law of the Member State concerned, granting the Member State of the offence access to vehicle registration data (VRD) of the Member State of registration.
Države članice bi morale druga drugi podeliti pravico dostopa do svojih podatkov iz registrov vozil, da bi izboljšale izmenjavo informacij in pospešile veljavne postopke.
A more efficient cross-border exchange of VRD, which should facilitate the identification of persons suspected of committing a road-safety-related traffic offence, might increase the deterrent effect and induce more cautious behaviour by the driver of a vehicle that is registered in a Member State other than the Member State of the offence, thereby preventing casualties due to road traffic accidents.
Zato bi bilo treba v to direktivo čim bolj vključiti določbe o tehničnih specifikacijah in razpoložljivosti avtomatizirane izmenjave podatkov, določene v prümskih sklepih.
The road-safety-related traffic offences covered by this Directive are not subject to homogeneous treatment in the Member States.
Sklep 2008/616/PNZ določa varnostne lastnosti obstoječih programskih aplikacij in povezane tehnične zahteve za izmenjavo podatkov o registraciji vozil.
Some Member States qualify such offences under national law as ‘administrative’ offences while others qualify them as ‘criminal’ offences.
Brez poseganja v splošno veljavnost navedenega sklepa bi bilo treba te varnostne lastnosti in tehnične zahteve zaradi regulativne in praktične učinkovitosti uporabljati za namene te direktive.
This Directive should apply regardless of how those offences are qualified under national law.
Obstoječe programske aplikacije bi morale biti podlaga za izmenjavo podatkov v skladu s to direktivo in bi morale hkrati tudi olajšati poročanje držav članic Komisiji.
Member States should grant each other the right of access to their VRD in order to improve the exchange of information and to speed up the procedures in force.
Take aplikacije bi morale zagotoviti hitro, varno in zaupno izmenjavo specifičnih podatkov iz registrov vozil med državami članicami.
To this end, the provisions concerning the technical specifications and the availability of automated data exchange set out in the Prüm Decisions should, as far as possible, be included in this Directive.
Izkoristiti bi bilo treba programsko aplikacijo Evropskega informacijskega sistema za prometna in vozniška dovoljenja (Eucaris), ki jo morajo države članice v skladu s prümskima sklepoma uporabiti za podatke iz registrov vozil.
Decision 2008/616/JHA specifies the security features for existing software applications and the related technical requirements for the exchange of vehicle registration data.
Komisija bi morala oceniti delovanje programskih aplikacij, ki se uporabljajo za namen te direktive, in o njem poročati.
Without prejudice to the general applicability of that Decision, those security features and technical requirements should, for reasons of regulatory and practical efficiency, be used for the purposes of this Directive.
Področje uporabe navedenih programskih aplikacij bi moralo biti omejeno na postopke izmenjave informacij med nacionalnimi kontaktnimi točkami v državah članicah.
Existing software applications should be the basis for the data exchange under this Directive and should, at the same time, also facilitate the reporting by Member States to the Commission.
Postopki in avtomatizirani procesi, v katerih se bodo informacije uporabljale, ne sodijo v področje uporabe tovrstnih aplikacij.
Such applications should provide for the expeditious, secure and confidential exchange of specific VRD between Member States.
Namen strategije upravljanja informacij za notranjo varnost EU je poiskati najenostavnejše, najlažje sledljive in stroškovno najučinkovitejše rešitve za izmenjavo podatkov.
Advantage should be taken of the European Vehicle and Driving Licence Information System (Eucaris) software application, which is mandatory for Member States under the Prüm Decisions as regards VRD.
Lastnik ali imetnik vozila ali drugače identificirana oseba, osumljena storitve prometnega prekrška, povezanega z varnostjo v cestnem prometu, bi morali biti dosegljivi za države članice, da bi jih obveščale o veljavnih postopkih in pravnih posledicah v skladu z zakonodajo države članice prekrška.
The Commission should assess and report on the functioning of the software applications used for the purposes of this Directive.
Pri tem bi morale države članice razmisliti o tem, da bi informacije o prometnih prekrških, povezanih z varnostjo v cestnem prometu, poslale v jeziku dokumentov o registraciji ali v jeziku, ki ga zadevna oseba najverjetneje razume, da se zagotovi, da ta oseba dobro razume sporočene informacije.
The scope of those software applications should be limited to the processes used in the exchange of information between the national contact points in the Member States.
Države članice bi morale uporabiti ustrezne postopke, s katerimi bi zagotovile, da se obvesti le zadevna oseba in ne nekdo tretji.
Procedures and automated processes in which the information is to be used are outside the scope of such applications.
V ta namen bi morale države članice uporabiti podrobno ureditev, podobno že sprejeti, ki jo uporabljajo za nadaljnjo obravnavo takih prekrškov, po potrebi vključno s sredstvi, kot je povratnica o prispeli pošiljki.
The Information Management Strategy for EU internal security aims to find the simplest and most easily traceable and cost-effective solutions for data exchange.
S tem se bo tej osebi omogočilo, da se ustrezno odzove na pisno obvestilo, zlasti s prošnjo po dodatnih informacijah, poravnavo kazni ali uveljavljanjem svojih pravic do obrambe, zlasti v primeru napačne identifikacije.
Member States should be able to contact the owner, the holder of the vehicle or the otherwise identified person suspected of committing the road-safety-related traffic offence in order to keep the person concerned informed of the applicable procedures and the legal consequences under the law of the Member State of the offence.
Nadaljnji postopki so zajeti v veljavnih pravnih instrumentih, vključno z instrumenti o medsebojni pomoči in vzajemnem priznavanju, na primer z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2005/214/PNZ [7].
In doing so, Member States should consider sending the information concerning road-safety-related traffic offences in the language of the registration documents, or in the language most likely to be understood by the person concerned, to ensure that that person has a clear understanding of the information which is being shared with the person concerned.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti ustrezen prevod pisnega obvestila, ki ga pošlje država članica prekrška, kot je določeno v Direktivi 2010/64/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8].
Member States should apply the appropriate procedures to ensure that only the person concerned is informed and not a third party.
Za izvajanje politike varnosti v cestnem prometu, katere namen je visoka raven zaščite vseh udeležencev v cestnem prometu v Uniji, in ob upoštevanju velike raznolikosti razmer v Uniji bi morale države članice brez poseganja v strožje politike in zakonodaje sprejeti ukrepe za zagotovitev večje skladnosti cestnoprometnih predpisov in njihovega izvrševanja med državami članicami.
To that effect, Member States should use detailed arrangements similar to those adopted for following up such offences including means such as, where appropriate, registered delivery.
Komisija bi morala v okviru svojega poročila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi te direktive preučiti potrebo po razvoju skupnih standardov za vzpostavitev primerljivih metod, prakse in minimalnih standardov na ravni Unije, ob upoštevanju mednarodnega sodelovanja in obstoječih sporazumov na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu, zlasti Dunajske konvencije o cestnem prometu z dne 8. novembra 1968.
This will allow that person to respond to the information letter in an appropriate way, in particular by asking for more information, by settling the fine or by exercising his/her rights of defence, especially in the case of mistaken identity.
Komisija bi morala v svojem poročilu Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi te direktive v državah članicah preučiti, ali so potrebna skupna merila za postopke nadaljnje obravnave, ki jih izvajajo države članice v primeru neplačane denarne kazni, v skladu z zakonodajo in postopki držav članic.
Further proceedings are covered by applicable legal instruments, including instruments on mutual assistance and on mutual recognition, for example Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA [7].
V tem poročilu bi morala Komisija obravnavati vprašanja, kot so postopki med pristojnimi organi držav članic za posredovanje dokončne odločitve o uvedbi sankcije in/ali denarne kazni, kot tudi priznavanje in izvrševanje dokončne odločitve.
Member States should provide equivalent translation with respect to the information letter sent by the Member State of the offence, as provided for in Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [8].
Pri pripravi pregleda te direktive bi se morala Komisija posvetovati z ustreznimi deležniki, kot so organi za varnost v cestnem prometu in organi kazenskega pregona ali pristojna telesa, združenja žrtev in druge nevladne organizacije, ki delujejo na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu.
With a view to pursuing a road safety policy that aims to provide a high level of protection for all road users in the Union, and taking into account the widely differing circumstances pertaining within the Union, Member States should act, without prejudice to more restrictive policies and laws, in order to ensure greater convergence of road traffic rules and of their enforcement between Member States.
Tesnejše sodelovanje organov kazenskega pregona bi moralo biti povezano s spoštovanjem temeljnih pravic, zlasti pravice do spoštovanja zasebnosti in varstva osebnih podatkov, kar bi bilo treba zagotoviti s posebno ureditvijo varstva podatkov.
In the framework of its report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Directive, the Commission should examine the need to develop common standards in order to establish comparable methods, practices and minimum standards at Union level taking into account international cooperation and existing agreements in the field of road safety, in particular the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic of 8 November 1968.
Ta ureditev bi morala zlasti upoštevati posebno naravo čezmejnega spletnega dostopa do zbirk podatkov.
In its report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Directive by the Member States, the Commission should examine the need for common criteria for follow-up procedures by Member States in the event of non-payment of a financial penalty, in accordance with Member States' laws and procedures.
Vzpostaviti je treba programske aplikacije, ki bodo omogočile pogoje za varno izmenjavo informacij ter zagotovile zaupnost posredovanih podatkov.
In that report, the Commission should address issues such as the procedures between the competent authorities of the Member States for the transmission of the final decision to impose a sanction and/or financial penalty as well as the recognition and enforcement of the final decision.
Podatke, zbrane na podlagi te direktive, bi bilo treba uporabljati samo za namene, ki so opredeljeni v tej direktivi.
In preparing the review of this Directive, the Commission should consult the relevant stakeholders, such as road safety and law enforcement authorities or competent bodies, victims' associations and other non-governmental organisations active in the field of road safety.
Države članice bi morale izpolnjevati obveznosti glede pogojev uporabe in začasne hrambe podatkov.
Closer cooperation between law enforcement authorities should go hand in hand with respect for fundamental rights, in particular the right to respect for privacy and to the protection of personal data, guaranteed by special data protection arrangements.
Za doseganje legitimnih ciljev te direktive na področju varnosti v cestnem prometu, zlasti zagotavljanja visoke ravni zaščite za vse udeležence v cestnem prometu v Uniji z omogočanjem lažje čezmejne izmenjave informacij o prometnih prekrških, povezanih z varnostjo v cestnem prometu, in s tem izvrševanja sankcij, je obdelava osebnih podatkov, ki je določena s to direktivo, ustrezna in ne presega tistega, kar je ustrezno in potrebno za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
Those arrangements should take particular account of the specific nature of cross-border online access to databases.
Podatki o identifikaciji storilca prekrška so osebni podatki.
It is necessary that the software applications to be set up enable the exchange of information to be carried out in secure conditions and ensure the confidentiality of the data transmitted.
Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9] bi bilo treba uporabljati za obdelavo podatkov, ki se izvaja v skladu s to direktivo.
The data collected under this Directive should not be used for purposes other than those of this Directive.
Brez poseganja v postopkovne zahteve za pritožbo in odškodninske postopke, ki veljajo v zadevni državi članici, bi bilo treba osebo, na katero se nanašajo osebni podatki, v obvestilu o prekršku ustrezno obvestiti o pravici do dostopa do osebnih podatkov ter pravici do popravka in izbrisa osebnih podatkov, pa tudi o najdaljšem zakonitem obdobju hrambe podatkov.
Member States should comply with the obligations on the conditions of use and of temporary storage of the data.
V tem okviru bi morala oseba, na katero se nanašajo podatki, imeti tudi pravico do popravka netočnih osebnih podatkov ali takojšnjega izbrisa nezakonito zabeleženih podatkov.
The processing of personal data provided by this Directive is appropriate for attaining the legitimate aims pursued by this Directive in the field of road safety, namely to ensure a high level of protection for all road users in the Union by facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences and, thereby, the enforcement of sanctions, and does not exceed what is appropriate and necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
V okviru prümskih sklepov se za obdelavo podatkov iz registrov vozil, ki vsebujejo osebne podatke, uporabljajo posebne določbe o varstvu podatkov iz Sklepa 2008/615/PNZ.