natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission next defined the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market for each product type during the investigation period in order to decide whether to use actual domestic sales price for the calculation of the normal value, in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe za vsako vrsto izdelka določila delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v obdobju preiskave, da bi se odločila, ali bo za izračun normalne vrednosti uporabila dejansko domačo prodajno ceno.
The normal value is based on the actual domestic price per product type, irrespective of whether those sales are profitable or not, if:
Normalna vrednost temelji na dejanski domači ceni za posamezno vrsto izdelka, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne, če je:
the sales volume of the product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of this product type; and
obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, enaki izračunanim stroškom proizvodnje ali višji od njih, predstavljal več kot 80 % skupnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka in
the weighted average sales price of that product type is equal to or higher than the unit cost of production.
je tehtana povprečna prodajna cena te vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od proizvodnih stroškov na enoto.
The normal value is based on the actual domestic price per product type of only the profitable domestic sales of the product types during the investigation period, if:
Normalna vrednost temelji na dejanski domači ceni za posamezno vrsto izdelka, in sicer izključno pri dobičkonosni domači prodaji te vrste izdelka v obdobju preiskave, če:
the volume of profitable sales of the product type represents 80 % or less of the total sales volume of this type; or
obseg dobičkonosne prodaje te vrste izdelka predstavlja 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka ali
the weighted average price of this product type is below the unit cost of production.
je tehtana povprečna cena te vrste izdelka nižja od proizvodnih stroškov na enoto.
When there were no or insufficient sales of a product type of the like product in the ordinary course of trade or where a product type was not sold in representative quantities on the domestic market, the Commission constructed the normal value in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Če ni bilo prodaje določene vrste podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine ali je ni bilo dovolj ali če določena vrsta izdelka ni bila prodana v reprezentativnih količinah na domačem trgu, je Komisija konstruirala normalno vrednost v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
Normal value was constructed by adding the following to the average cost of production of the like product of each cooperating exporting producer during the investigation period:
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da se je povprečnim stroškom proizvodnje podobnega izdelka vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v obdobju preiskave prištelo naslednje:
the weighted average selling, general and administrative (‘SG&A’) expenses incurred by each cooperating exporting producer on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the investigation period; and
tehtano povprečje prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov („PSA-stroški“) vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki so v obdobju preiskave nastali pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine, in
the weighted average profit realised by each cooperating exporting producer on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the investigation period.
tehtani povprečni dobiček, ki ga je dosegel vsak sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine v obdobju preiskave.
The exporting producers exported to the Union either directly to independent customers or through related companies acting as importers.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so v Unijo izvažali neposredno neodvisnim strankam ali prek povezanih družb uvoznic.
When the exporting producer exported the product concerned directly to independent customers in the Union, including through traders, the export price was established on the basis of prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Union, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Če je proizvajalec izvoznik zadevni izdelek izvozil neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji, tudi prek trgovcev, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi plačanih ali plačljivih cen za zadevni izdelek, ko je bil prodan za izvoz v Unijo.
When the exporting producers exported the product concerned to the Union through a related company acting as an importer, the export price was constructed on the basis of the price at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Union, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Če je proizvajalec izvoznik zadevni izdelek izvozil v Unijo prek povezane družbe uvoznice, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe konstruirana na podlagi cene, po kateri je bil uvoženi izdelek prvič prodan naprej neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
The export price was also, in accordance with the same Article, constructed when the product concerned was not resold in the condition in which it was imported.
Izvozna cena je bila v skladu z istim členom konstruirana tudi, če zadevni izdelek ni bil prodan naprej v stanju, v katerem je bil uvožen.
In such cases, adjustments to the price were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale, including SG&A expenses, and for profits.
V takih primerih so bile prilagoditve cene izvedene za vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s PSA-stroški, in za dobiček.
The Commission compared the normal value and the export price of the exporting producers on an ex-works basis.
Komisija je normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno proizvajalcev izvoznikov primerjala na podlagi franko tovarna.
Where justified by the need to ensure a fair comparison, the Commission adjusted the normal value and/or the export price for differences affecting prices and price comparability, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar je to upravičeno s potrebo, da se zagotovi poštena primerjava, je Komisija prilagodila normalno vrednost in/ali izvozno ceno za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
The sole exporting producer from Korea, POSCO, cooperated fully with the Commission's investigation.
Edini proizvajalec izvoznik iz Koreje, družba POSCO, je v celoti sodeloval v preiskavi Komisije.
POSCO used a complex network of sales channels to sell the product concerned in the EU and on their domestic market.
Družba POSCO je uporabljala zapleteno mrežo prodajnih poti za prodajo zadevnega izdelka v EU in na domačem trgu.
Normal value for the sole exporting producer was established in line with the general methodology set out in section 3.1.1 above.
Normalna vrednost za edinega proizvajalca izvoznika je bila določena v skladu s splošno metodologijo, navedeno v razdelku 3.1.1 zgoraj.
As a result, the normal value for the majority of product types exported to the Union was based on the domestic price.
Zato je normalna vrednost večine vrst izdelkov, izvoženih v Unijo, temeljila na domači ceni.
The normal value for the remaining types was constructed.
Normalna vrednost za druge vrste je bila konstruirana.
The sole exporting producer exported to the Union directly; through trading companies in Korea; and through related companies acting as importers located in the Union.
Edini proizvajalec izvoznik je izvažal v Unijo neposredno, prek trgovinskih družb v Koreji in prek povezanih družb uvoznic v Uniji.
For those exports via importers in the Union the export price was constructed on the basis of Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Za navedeni izvoz prek uvoznikov v Uniji se je izvozna cena konstruirala na podlagi člena 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
Otherwise, the export price was established using the general methodology set out in section 3.1.2 above.
V drugih primerih je bila izvozna cena določena s splošno metodologijo, navedeno v razdelku 3.1.2 zgoraj.
The exporting producer claimed that it formed a single economic entity with its trading companies and its related companies in the Union and therefore no adjustment under Article 2(9) to determine the export price was necessary.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je predstavljal en gospodarski subjekt s svojimi trgovinskimi družbami in povezanimi družbami v Uniji, zaradi česar za določitev izvozne cene ni bila potrebna prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(9).
In accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, where there is an association between the exporting producer and the related importers, the export price is considered to be unreliable.
Kadar med proizvajalcem izvoznikom in povezanimi uvozniki ni povezave, se v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe izvozna cena šteje za nezanesljivo.
There is no language in Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation that:
Besedilo člena 2(9) osnovne uredbe ne:
differentiates between various types of association,
razlikuje med različnimi vrstami povezav,
prescribes the degree of control or integration for the application of the adjustments, or
predpisuje stopnje nadzora ali integracije za uporabo prilagoditev ali
precludes the applicability of such adjustments where there is a single economic entity.
izključuje uporabe takih prilagoditev v primeru enega gospodarskega subjekta.
Therefore, it is clear that the form of association cannot have any impact on the applicability of the adjustments which aim at rendering the export price reliable.
Zato je jasno, da oblika povezave ne more vplivati na uporabo prilagoditev, katerih namen je zanesljiva izvozna cena.
Such adjustments are compulsory once the price has to be constructed.
Ko je ceno treba konstruirati, so take prilagoditve obvezne.
The Commission verified that POSCO Germany and POSCO Italy performed all the functions normally performed by related importers in the Union.
Komisija je potrdila, da sta družbi POSCO Germany in POSCO Italy izvajali vse naloge, ki jih običajno izvajajo povezani uvozniki v Uniji.
It is not disputed that POSCO Germany and POSCO Italy acted as related importers for the Korean exporting producer.
Nesporno je, da sta bili družbi POSCO Germany in POSCO Italy povezana uvoznika za korejskega proizvajalca izvoznika.
The Commission therefore concluded that there was an association between the exporting producer and the importers and applied the prescribed adjustments for all costs incurred between importation and resale and for reasonable profit to establish a reliable export price.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da je med proizvajalcem izvoznikom in uvoznikoma obstajala povezava, ter uporabila predpisane prilagoditve za vse stroške, ki so nastali med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, ter za razumni dobiček, da je določila zanesljivo izvozno ceno.
The Commission compared the normal value and the export price of the sole exporting producer on an ex-works basis.
Komisija je normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno edinega proizvajalca izvoznika primerjala na podlagi franko tovarna.
Where justified by the need to ensure a fair comparison, the Commission adjusted the normal value and/or the export price for differences affecting price comparability, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar je to upravičeno s potrebo, da se zagotovi poštena primerjava, je Komisija prilagodila normalno vrednost in/ali izvozno ceno za razlike, ki so vplivale na primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Adjustments were made for freight, handling costs, packaging, credit costs and bank charges.
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene za stroške prevoza, manipulativne stroške, stroške pakiranja, stroške kredita in bančne stroške.
The exporting producer made a claim under Article 2(10)(d)(i) of the basic Regulation for a level of trade adjustment, arguing that all their domestic sales were made to end users, whilst all their export sales to the Union were to related or unrelated traders.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je v skladu s členom 2(10)(d)(i) osnovne uredbe zahteval prilagoditev za raven trgovanja, pri čemer je trdil, da je bila celotna domača prodaja namenjena končnim uporabnikom, medtem ko je bil celoten izvoz v Unijo namenjen povezanim ali nepovezanim trgovcem.
The exporting producer was however unable to demonstrate any consistent and distinct price differences for different levels of trade on either its domestic or export market.
Vendar proizvajalec izvoznik ni mogel dokazati doslednih in očitnih razlik v cenah za različne ravni trgovanja na domačem ali izvoznem trgu.
Subsequently, the exporting producer claimed an adjustment under Article 2(10)(d)(ii) of the basic Regulation.
Nato je proizvajalec izvoznik zahteval prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(d)(ii) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission cannot accept this claim either as exports to the Union were through related companies and then to unrelated end-users, and therefore the level of trade of exports and domestic sales was the same.
Komisija tudi te zahteve ne more sprejeti, ker je izvoz v Unijo potekal prek povezanih družb in nato nepovezanih končnih uporabnikov, zaradi česar je bila raven trgovanja v zvezi z izvozom in domačo prodajo enaka.
For the sole exporting producer, the Commission compared the weighted average normal value of each type of the like product with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je za edinega proizvajalca izvoznika primerjala tehtano povprečno normalno vrednost vsake vrste podobnega izdelka s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka v skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe.
The level of cooperation from Korea was high as the imports of the cooperating exporting producer constituted around 100 % of the total exports to the Union during the investigation period.
Stopnja sodelovanja Koreje je bila visoka, ker je uvoz sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika predstavljal približno 100 % celotnega izvoza v Unijo v obdobju preiskave.
On this basis, the Commission established the country wide dumping margin at the same level as for the sole exporting producer.
Na podlagi tega je Komisija na ravni države določila stopnjo dampinga na ravni, ki je enaka kot za edinega proizvajalca izvoznika.
The provisional dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Začasni stopnji dampinga, izraženi kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, sta:
Two exporting producers, Baosteel and WISCO, cooperated with the investigation, representing about 100 % of all exports to the EU.
V preiskavi sta sodelovala dva proizvajalca izvoznika, Baosteel in WISCO, ki predstavljata 100 % celotnega izvoza v EU.
Both companies exported to the EU via related importers in the Union.
Obe družbi sta v EU izvažali prek povezanih uvoznikov v Uniji.
Neither of the cooperating exporting producers in the PRC claimed market economy treatment.
Nihče od sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK ni zahteval tržnogospodarske obravnave.
Therefore, the normal value was determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country (‘analogue country’) in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bila normalna vrednost v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) določena na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“).
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission informed interested parties that it proposed the Republic of Korea as an appropriate analogue country and invited them to comment.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani obvestila, da je kot primerno primerljivo državo predlagala Republiko Korejo, in jih pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe.
One party claimed Korea would not constitute an appropriate analogue country and suggested using Russia instead.
Ena stran je trdila, da Koreja ne bo predstavljala primerne primerljive države in namesto nje predlagala Rusijo.
The Russian domestic market is relatively closed and is dominated by one single producing group.
Ruski domači trg je razmeroma zaprt in ga obvladuje samo ena skupina proizvajalcev.
The market share of imports is very low (less than 5 % in 2013) and Russia has import duties on GOES (5 %).
Tržni delež uvoza je zelo majhen (manj kot 5 % leta 2013), Rusija pa ima uvozno dajatev na GOES (5 %).
Moreover, the type/grade of Russian GOES is not comparable with Chinese exports to the Union of GOES.
Poleg tega vrsta/razred ruskih GOES ni primerljiva s kitajskim izvozom GOES v Unijo.
Therefore, Russia was not considered as an appropriate analogue country.
Rusija zato po mnenju Komisije ni bila primerna primerljiva država.
As stated in the Notice of Initiation, the Commission also examined whether any of the other countries concerned, or any other market economy third countries in which GOES is produced, could constitute an appropriate analogue country.
Kot je navedeno v obvestilu o začetku, je Komisija proučila tudi, ali bi lahko katera koli druga zadevna država ali katera koli tretja država s tržnim gospodarstvom, v kateri se proizvajajo GOES, lahko predstavljala primerljivo državo.
According to the information available to the Commission the only countries other than the countries concerned that produce GOES are Brazil and India.
Po informacijah, ki so na voljo Komisiji, sta, poleg zadevnih držav, edini državi, ki proizvajata GOES, Brazilija in Indija.
Both Brazil and India have only one producer of GOES and each of them is manufacturing product types that are not comparable to the types produced and exported by the cooperating exporting producers in the PRC.
Brazilija in Indija imata le po enega proizvajalca GOES, ki proizvaja vrste izdelka, ki niso primerljive z vrstami, ki jih proizvajata in izvažata sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika v LRK.
In addition, both countries levy import duties on GOES and, in particular India, is mainly an importing country with negligible domestic production.
Poleg tega imata obe državi uvozne dajatve za GOES, pri čemer je zlasti Indija predvsem država uvoznica z zanemarljivo domačo proizvodnjo.
Therefore, neither Brazil nor India was considered as an appropriate analogue country.
Zato se Brazilija in Indija nista šteli za primerni primerljivi državi.
With regard to Japan and the US the examination revealed that both markets are dominated by two domestic producers and have small import quantities.
V zvezi z Japonsko in ZDA je bilo v preiskavi razkrito, da oba trga obvladujeta dva domača proizvajalca, uvoz pa je majhen.
Both the Japanese and the US domestic market can therefore be considered relatively closed for competition.
Zato se lahko japonski domači trg in domači trg ZDA štejeta kot razmeroma zaprta za konkurenco.
As far as Korea is concerned, the domestic market for GOES is relatively open with imports having a sizeable market share (over 20 % in 2013).
Domači trg Koreje za GOES je razmeroma odprt, pri čemer ima uvoz znaten tržni delež (več kot 20 % leta 2013).
The Korean producer is a large producer with extensive quantities of domestic and export sales.
Korejski proizvajalec je velik proizvajalec z obsežno domačo prodajo in izvozom.
It produces similar types of the like product to those exported to the Union by the Chinese producers.
Proizvaja primerljive vrste podobnega izdelka, kot jih v Unijo izvažata kitajska proizvajalca.
There is no customs duty on imports of GOES from the Union, the PRC and Japan.
Za uvoz GOES iz Unije, LRK in Japonske ni carine.
The Commission concluded at this stage of the proceeding that the Republic of Korea is the most appropriate analogue country under Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v tej fazi postopka sklenila, da je Republika Koreja najprimernejša primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
As mentioned above (recital 64), the normal value for the two exporting producers in the PRC was determined on the basis of the price or constructed normal value in the analogue country, in this case Korea, in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj (uvodna izjava 64), je bila normalna vrednost za oba proizvajalca izvoznika v LRK v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi cene ali konstruirane normalne vrednosti v primerljivi državi, v tem primeru Koreji.
The exporting producers exported to the Union through traders and importers located both in the PRC and in the Union.
Proizvajalca izvoznika sta v Unijo izvažala prek trgovcev in uvoznikov v LRK in Uniji.
The export price was therefore established on the basis of the price at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Union, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Izvozna cena je bila v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe zato določena na podlagi cene, po kateri je bil uvoženi izdelek prvič prodan naprej neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
In this case, adjustments to the price were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale, including SG&A expenses, and for a profit from an unrelated importer.
V tem primeru so bile prilagoditve cene izvedene za vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s PSA-stroški, in za dobiček nepovezanega uvoznika.
The Commission compared the normal value as established in the analogue country with the export price of the exporting producers in the PRC on an ex-works basis.
Komisija je normalno vrednost, kot je bila določena v primerljivi državi, primerjala z izvozno ceno proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK na podlagi franko tovarna.
For one exporting producer, one product type could not be matched to the product types produced by the Korean producer.
Pri enem od proizvajalcev izvoznikov ene vrste izdelka ni bilo mogoče povezati z vrstami izdelka, ki jih proizvaja korejski proizvajalec.
This was due to the core loss for that particular product type.
Razlog je bila izguba jedra te določene vrste izdelka.
In this case the export price was compared to the normal value of the most closely resembling product type, matching all characteristics but with the nearest possible core loss.
V tem primeru se je izvozna cena primerjala z normalno vrednostjo najbolj podobne vrste izdelka, pri kateri so bile vse značilnosti enake, izguba jedra pa čim bolj podobna.
Where justified by the need to ensure a fair comparison, under Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation the Commission adjusted the normal value and/or the export price for differences affecting prices and price comparability.
Kadar je to upravičeno s potrebo, da se zagotovi poštena primerjava, je Komisija v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe prilagodila normalno vrednost in/ali izvozno ceno za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen.
Adjustments were made for freight costs, credit costs, handling and loading expenses, packaging and bank charges.
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene za stroške prevoza, stroške kredita, manipulativne stroške, stroške natovarjanja, stroške pakiranja in bančne stroške.
The normal value was adjusted to ensure that it was expressed at the same level of taxation as the export price, as part of the VAT charged on export of GOES from the PRC was not refunded to the companies concerned during the IP.
Normalna vrednost je bila prilagojena za zagotovitev, da je bila izražena po enaki stopnji obdavčenja kot izvozna cena, ker del DDV, zaračunan na izvoz GOES iz LRK, v obdobju preiskave zadevnim družbam ni bil povrnjen.