natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission informed the exporting producer concerned on 30 October 2015 that for the reasons set out under recitals 60 and 61, it considered that the company had not provided the necessary information concerning export prices and cost of production of the product concerned within the time limits set in the basic Regulation and that it intended to apply facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation for the establishment of possible dumping for the company in question.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali je celotni obseg domače prodaje vsakega od obeh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov reprezentativen.
The company commented on the intention of the Commission to use facts available on 13 November 2015 and stated that it cooperated with the investigation to the best of its abilities.
Domača prodaja je reprezentativna, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu na proizvajalca izvoznika v obdobju preiskave predstavljal vsaj 5 % njegovega celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
The company submitted that it had provided all information that would allow the Commission to arrive at reasonably accurate findings but that it could not be asked to report information that would impose an unreasonable, excessive investigative burden on it.
Na podlagi tega je bilo za vse proizvajalce izvoznike ugotovljeno, da je bil njihov celotni obseg prodaje podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu reprezentativen.
The company further requested an exceptional second verification visit before the imposition of any provisional duty.
Komisija je za proizvajalce izvoznike z reprezentativno domačo prodajo naknadno ugotovila, katere vrste izdelka, prodane na domačem trgu, so bile enake vrstam izdelka, prodanim za izvoz v Unijo, ali primerljive z njimi.
The Commission examined the comments of the company and concluded that these comments did not put forward any new, yet verifiable elements that could alter its intention to use, at this stage of the investigation, facts available in the determination of possible dumping for the company concerned.
Komisija je nato v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali je domača prodaja vsakega od obeh proizvajalcev izvoznikov na njunem domačem trgu reprezentativna za posamezne vrste izdelka, ki so enake vrstam, prodanim za izvoz v Unijo, ali primerljive z njimi.
The Commission also considers that it has not imposed any unreasonable burden on the company by insisting on a proper reconciliation of its production and sales data which is necessary for the verification of such data for the product concerned.
Analiza domače prodaje je pokazala, da je bilo za nekatere vrste izdelka nekaj domače prodaje dobičkonosne in da je bila tehtana povprečna prodajna cena višja od stroškov proizvodnje.
Furthermore, the Commission considers that in light of the deficiencies already identified in the information reported by the company itself, a second on-the-spot verification visit would not be meaningful.
Zato se je normalna vrednost izračunala kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje v obdobju preiskave, če so bili izpolnjeni pogoji iz uvodne izjave 69, ali zgolj kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje, če navedeni pogoji niso bili izpolnjeni.
Thus, in line with Article 18 of the basic Regulation the Commission provisionally established the dumping margin for this company on the basis of facts available.
Če prodaje nekaterih vrst podobnega izdelka ni bilo ali pa je bila nezadostna ali če prodaja v običajnem poteku trgovine ni bila ugotovljena, je Komisija normalno vrednost konstruirala v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission first examined whether the total volume of domestic sales for each of the two exporting producers was representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da se je povprečnim stroškom proizvodnje podobnega izdelka obeh proizvajalcev izvoznikov v obdobju preiskave prištelo naslednje:
The domestic sales are representative if the total domestic sales volume of the like product to independent customers on the domestic market per exporting producer represented at least 5 % of its total export sales volume of the product concerned to the Union during the investigation period.
tehtani povprečni dobiček, ki ga je dosegel vsak sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine v obdobju preiskave.
The Commission subsequently identified the product types sold domestically that were identical or comparable with the product types sold for export to the Union for the exporting producers with representative domestic sales.
Za vrste izdelka, ki se na domačem trgu niso prodale, so se prišteli povprečni PSA-stroški in dobiček od vseh transakcij, opravljenih na domačem trgu v običajnem poteku trgovine.
The Commission then examined whether the domestic sales by each of the two exporting producers on its domestic market for each product type that is identical or comparable with a product type sold for export to the Union were representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Vsi proizvajalci izvozniki so v svojih računovodskih izkazih priznali velike izgube zaradi razlik v menjalnem tečaju, ki so nastale pri pretvorbi transakcij, ki niso bile denominirane v ruskih rubljih.
the volume of profitable sales of the product type represents 80 % or less of the total sales volume of this type:
Komisija jih je obravnavala kot del PSA-stroškov družbe in jih vključila v izračun normalne vrednosti.
The analysis of domestic sales showed that for some product types, some domestic sales were profitable and that the weighted average sales price was higher than the cost of production.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju ugotovitev preveritev na kraju samem prilagodila stroške proizvodnje za enega proizvajalca izvoznika.
Where there were no or insufficient sales of certain product types of the like product or where no sales were found in the ordinary course of trade, the Commission constructed the normal value in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija ni mogla uskladiti količin, vrednosti in povezanih stroškov nekaterih kupljenih surovin z računovodskimi izkazi družbe, saj družba ni navedla teh stroškov v seznamih nakupov surovin, ki jih je Komisiji predložila v izpolnjenem vprašalniku in pozivu k dopolnitvi.
Normal value was constructed by adding the following to the average cost of production of the like product of the two exporting producers during the investigation period:
Komisija je ugotovila tudi, da zadevna družba ni navedla podatkov o nakupih surovin, kot jih je spremenila s svojim odgovorom na poziv k dopolnitvi, v obliki, zahtevani v vprašalniku, zato Komisija ni mogla preveriti sprememb zalog in potrošnje surovin v obdobju preiskave.
the weighted average selling, general and administrative (‘SG&A’) expenses incurred by the cooperating exporting producers on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the investigation period;
Poleg tega ima Komisija dokaze, ki jih je zbrala med preveritvijo na kraju samem, da se proizvodni stroški v računovodskih izkazih družbe razlikujejo od proizvodnih stroškov, prikazanih za iste računovodske izkaze v avtomatiziranem modulu za razporeditev stroškov, ki se uporablja za razporeditev stroškov na različne izdelke.
the weighted average profit realised by the cooperating exporting producers on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the investigation period.
Komisija je 30. oktobra 2015 obvestila zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika, da iz razlogov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 76, meni, da družba ni predložila potrebnih informacij o proizvodnih stroških zadevnega izdelka v rokih, določenih v osnovni uredbi, in da namerava v skladu s členom 18 za določitev normalne vrednosti uporabiti razpoložljiva dejstva.
For the product types not sold in representative quantities on the domestic market, the average SG&A expenses and profit of transactions made in the ordinary course of trade on the domestic market for those types were added.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je 13. novembra 2015 predložil pripombe o nameri Komisije, da bo uporabila razpoložljiva dejstva, in dodatna pojasnila o razlikah med stroški v kontih v glavni knjigi in stroški, navedenimi v poročilu o izračunu stroškov.
For the product types not sold at all on the domestic market, the weighted average SG&A expenses and profit of all transactions made in the ordinary course of trade on the domestic market were added.
Družba je poleg tega 13. novembra 2015 priznala, da obstajajo odstopanja, ki jih je Komisija odkrila med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem in ki se nanašajo na stroške nakupov surovin, vendar je trdila, da lahko takoj opredeli razloge za ta odstopanja, za katera je menila, da so administrativne napake.
All exporting producers acknowledged in their financial statements significant losses due to the foreign currency exchange differences arising on translation of transactions not denominated in Russian roubles.
Komisija je proučila pripombe in pojasnila družbe ter menila, da točnosti dodatnih predloženih informacij ni več mogoče preveriti in uskladiti z računovodskimi izkazi družbe.
The Commission considered those as being part of the company's SG&A expenses and included those in the normal value calculation.
Poleg tega je Komisija menila, da odstopanja na področju stroškov nakupov surovin, ki jih je odkrila na kraju samem, niso administrativne napake, in navedla, da družba ni izpodbijala ugotovitve Komisije, da informacije o stroških nakupov surovin, zalogah surovin in potrošnji surovin niso bile navedene v izpolnjenem vprašalniku in pozivu k dopolnitvi.
In the light of the findings of the on-the-spot verifications, the Commission adjusted the cost of production for one of the exporting producers.
Komisija je sklenila, da pripombe in dodatna pojasnila družbe niso vsebovali nobenih novih, a preverljivih elementov, ki bi lahko spremenili njeno namero, da bo v tej fazi preiskave za določitev normalne vrednosti uporabila razpoložljiva dejstva.
The Commission found that the exporting producer in question had not properly and accurately reflected the actual costs of materials and related purchase costs in its cost reported.
Komisija je med preveritvijo na kraju samem odkrila tudi, da so se količniki potrošnje surovin, ki jih je med preveritvijo pridobila od nadzornega oddelka družbe, bistveno razlikovali od količnikov potrošnje surovin, ki jih je podjetje sporočilo 24. septembra 2015 v odgovoru na poziv Komisije k dopolnitvi.
The Commission was not able to reconcile the quantities, values and related costs of certain raw material purchased to the accounts of the company, as the company failed to report these costs in the purchase listings of the raw materials that it submitted to the Commission in its replies to the questionnaire and deficiency letter.
Komisija je na kraju samem od družbe zahtevala informacije o tem odstopanju.
The Commission found also that the company in question did not report the purchases of raw materials, as amended with its reply to the deficiency letter, in the format requested in the questionnaire, thereby making it impossible for the Commission to verify stock variations and material consumption during the investigation period.
Družba je pojasnila, da za poročanje o stroških surovin ni uporabila količnikov potrošnje nadzornega oddelka, temveč jih je izračunala tako, da je stroške surovin, ki jih je sporočila Komisiji, delila s stroški prodanega blaga.
Furthermore, the Commission has evidence which it collected during the on-the-spot verification showing that the manufacturing costs in the accounts of the company differ from the manufacturing costs shown for the same accounts in the automated cost allocation module used for the allocation of costs to the different products.
Zato je Komisija menila, da količniki potrošnje surovin, ki jih je sporočila družba, ne omogočajo točne ocene stroškov surovin.
The Commission informed the exporting producer concerned on 30 October 2015 that for the reasons set out under recital 76, it considered that the company had not provided the necessary information concerning the manufacturing cost of the product concerned within the time limits set in the basic Regulation and that it intended to make use of facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation for establishing the normal value.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, se je Komisija zato odločila, da bo spremenila stroške proizvodnje, ki jih je sporočila družba, in jih uskladila z dejanskimi dokazi o stroških surovin, ki jih je zbrala med preveritvijo na kraju samem.
The exporting producer commented on 13 November 2015 on the intention of the Commission to use the facts available and submitted additional explanations regarding differences between the expenses accounted in its general ledger accounts and costs identified in its cost calculation report.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so izvažali v Unijo bodisi neposredno prek povezanih družb uvoznic v Uniji bodisi prek povezanih ali nepovezanih trgovcev/uvoznikov s sedežem v Švici.
The company further admitted on 13 November 2015 the existence of discrepancies the Commission found during the on-the-spot verification visit and which pertain to purchase costs of raw materials, but it claimed that it could immediately identify the reasons for these discrepancies that it considered to be clerical mistakes.
Navedene švicarske povezane družbe, ki so v lasti ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, so zadevni izdelek kupile od proizvajalcev izvoznikov in ga nato nadalje prodale v Unijo in druge države.
The Commission examined the comments and explanations of the company and considered that the accuracy of the additional information submitted could no longer be verified and reconciled to the accounts of the company.
Če je proizvajalec izvoznik zadevni izdelek izvažal neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi plačane ali plačljive cene za zadevni izdelek, ko je bil prodan za izvoz v Unijo.
The Commission further considered that the discrepancies that it found on-the-spot concerning purchase costs of raw materials were not clerical mistakes and noted that the company has not contested the Commission finding that the information on raw material purchase related costs, on stocks of raw material and on raw material consumption was missing from its replies to the questionnaire and deficiency letter.
Če je proizvajalec izvoznik zadevni izdelek izvažal v Unijo prek povezane družbe uvoznice, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe konstruirana na podlagi cene, po kateri je bil uvoženi izdelek prvič nadalje prodan neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
The Commission concluded that the comments and additional explanations of the company had not brought forward any new, yet verifiable elements that could alter its intention to use, at this stage of the investigation, facts available in the determination of the normal value.
Izvozna cena je bila v skladu z istim členom konstruirana tudi, če zadevni izdelek ni bil nadalje prodan v stanju, v katerem je bil uvožen.
The Commission found also during the on-the-spot verification that the material consumption ratios that it obtained from the company's controlling department during the verification differed significantly from the material consumption ratios that the company reported on 24 September 2015 in its reply to the deficiency letter of the Commission.
V takih primerih so bile prilagoditve cene izvedene za vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s PSA-stroški, in za dobiček.
The Commission requested information from the company on-the-spot on this anomaly.
Preveritev enega proizvajalca izvoznika je pokazala, da je bilo 20 % izvoza v Unijo opravljenega nepovezanemu trgovcu s sedežem v Švici.
The company clarified that for the reporting of its material expenses it had not used the consumption ratios from its controlling department but rather calculated the consumption ratios by dividing the material expenses that it reported to the Commission by the cost of the goods sold.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je poročal o tej prodaji kot o prodaji neodvisni strani v Uniji in trdil, da s tem trgovcem ni v razmerju.
For this reason, the Commission considered that the material consumption ratios that the company reported did not enable the Commission to make an accurate assessment of its material expenses.
Namembni kraj blaga se je dokazal s carinskimi izvoznimi deklaracijami.
Consequently, as set out above, the Commission decided to modify the cost of production reported by the company to bring it in line with the factual evidence on costs of raw material that it collected during the on-the-spot verification.
Kljub dogovoru v pogodbah med proizvajalcem izvoznikom in trgovcem, da bo prodaja potekala v eurih ali ameriških dolarjih, je proizvajalec izvoznik poročal, da je ta prodaja potekala v ruskih rubljih, in predložil ustrezne račune v ruskih rubljih.
The exporting producers exported to the Union either directly, via related companies acting as importers in the Union, or via related or unrelated traders/importers based in Switzerland.
Komisija bo še naprej preiskovala to zadevo, zlasti ali je bila prodaja dejansko opravljena neodvisnemu kupcu za potrošnjo v Uniji in ali je bila sporočena ustrezna valuta.
Those Swiss related companies, owned by the Russian exporting producers, purchased the product concerned from the exporting producers and further sold it to the Union and other countries.
Komisija je začasno vključila navedeno prodajo v določitev izvozne cene.
When the exporting producer exported the product concerned directly to independent customers in the Union, the export price was established on the basis of prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Union, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je primerjala normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov na podlagi franko tovarna.
When the exporting producers exported the product concerned to the Union through a related company acting as an importer, the export price was constructed on the basis of the price at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Union, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Prilagoditve so se na področju izvoznih cen izvedle za stroške prevoza, manipulativne stroške, stroške natovarjanja in tozadevne stroške, uvozne dajatve, provizije od prodaje, stroške kredita in bančne stroške.
The export price was also, in accordance with the same Article, constructed when the product concerned was not resold in the condition in which it was imported.
Kar zadeva domače cene, so bile prilagoditve izvedene za domače stroške prevoza, pakiranja in kredita ter manipulativne stroške in provizije.
In such cases, adjustments to the price were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale, including SG&A expenses, and for profits.
Za primerjavo cen, ki vključuje tuje valute, je Komisija v skladu s členom 2(10)(j) osnovne uredbe uporabila menjalni tečaj na dan nabavnega naloga ali prodajne pogodbe, ki ustrezneje opredeljuje bistvene pogoje prodaje kot datum računa, saj je pogajanje o ceni, v okviru katerega je bila določena cena, potekalo v obdobju, ki je bilo blizu datumu nabavnega naloga ali prodajne pogodbe.
The verification of one exporting producer showed that 20 % of the export sales to the Union were made to an unrelated trader based in Switzerland.
Ustrezni račun je bil izdan, ko je bil izdelek odpremljen, kar je bilo običajno mesec ali dva meseca pozneje.
The exporting producer reported those sales as sales to an independent party in the Union, claiming it has no relationship with this trader.
Komisija je primerjala tehtano povprečno normalno vrednost vsake vrste podobnega izdelka s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka v skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe.
Customs export declarations were used to prove the goods destination.
Za ugotovitev začasne stopnje dampinga proizvajalca izvoznika, navedene v uvodnih izjavah 60 do 64, je Komisija kot razpoložljivo dejstvo uporabila raven stopnje dampinga najbolj izvažane vrste izdelka, za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je nekoliko višja od skupne stopnje dampinga enega od drugih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Despite the sales currency agreed in the contracts between the exporting producer and trader being euros or US dollars, the exporting producer reported those sales as done in Russian roubles with corresponding invoices in Russian roubles.
Izbira primernega proizvajalca izvoznika Komisije je temeljila na tehtnejši primerljivosti obsega prodaje na domačem trgu in izvoza Unije, geografski bližini, strukturi bistvenih surovin in sporočeni izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti.
The Commission will continue investigating this matter, in particular whether the sales were actually made to an independent buyer for consumption in the Union and reported in the appropriate currency.
Preglednica 3
The Commission provisionally included those sales in the determination of the export price.
Stopnje dampinga, Rusija
The Commission compared the normal value and the export price of the cooperating exporting producers on an ex-works basis.
Za vse druge proizvajalce izvoznike v Rusiji je Komisija stopnjo dampinga določila na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
As regards export prices, adjustments were made for transport related costs, handling, loading and ancillary charges, import charges, sales commissions, credit costs and bank charges.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 58, so preiskovane družbe predstavljale skoraj ves izvoz iz Rusije v Unijo.
Concerning domestic prices, adjustments were made for domestic transportation costs, packing costs, credit costs, handling and commissions.
Komisija je na podlagi tega sklenila, da bo stopnjo dampinga za vse ostale družbe določila na ravni družbe z najvišjo stopnjo dampinga.
For price comparison involving foreign currencies, the Commission used, under Article (2)(10)(j) of the basic Regulation the exchange rate applicable at the date of purchase order or sales contract which more appropriately establishes the material terms of sale than the invoice date as the price negotiation resulting in establishing the price was made in the period close to the purchase order or sales contract date.
Preglednica 4
The corresponding invoice was issued when the product has been shipped, which was generally one or two months later.
ŠKODA
The Commission compared the weighted average normal value of each type of the like product with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
OPREDELITEV POJMOV INDUSTRIJA UNIJE IN PROIZVODNJA UNIJE
For the determination of the provisional dumping margin of the exporting producer referred to in recitals 60 to 64, the Commission used as a fact available, the level of the dumping margin of the most exported product type that was found to be just above the overall dumping margin of one of the others exporting producers.
V okviru ugotavljanja reprezentativnosti je podatke o proizvodnji in prodaji predložilo 13 družb v Uniji, ki so navedle, da so podobni izdelek proizvajale v obdobju preiskave.
Magnitogorsk Iron & Steel Works OJSC
Proizvajalci Unije, ki so predstavljali celotno proizvodnjo v Uniji, pomenijo industrijo Unije v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe, zato se bo zanje v nadaljevanju uporabljala besedna zveza „industrija Unije“ v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
PAO Severstal
Sodelujoči proizvajalci Unije predstavljajo 89 % celotne proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
OJSC Novolipetsk Steel
Poslovni modeli in stopnje vertikalne integracije proizvajalcev Unije se razlikujejo.