natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hence the underlying financial transactions were in conformity with their face value.
Družba Sunny Energy je tudi navedla, da je vzpostavila stik s stranko iz uvodne izjave 27 in prejela celotno plačilo zadevnega računa.
In addition, the difference in the values on the undertaking invoices and the VAT invoices are marginal.
Komisija je to vzela na znanje; vendar je družba Sunny Energy ukrepe sprejela šele, ko je Komisija opazila težavo.
First, the VAT invoice included the price of the product concerned and of the non-reported ‘other products’ for which the sales price was different from those indicated on the undertaking invoice.
Prodaja iz skladišča v Uniji
Second, Sunny Energy did not provide any convincing argument for the difference between the various financial and administrative documents.
Družba Sunny Energy je tudi navedla, da je pripravljena ustaviti prodajo „drugih izdelkov“ iz carinskega skladišča v Uniji iz uvodne izjave 25, da bi se izognila morebitnemu tveganju navzkrižne kompenzacije.
Partial payment
Komisija je ugotovila, da bi ta zaveza odpravila tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije, vendar pa take zaveze ne bi bilo mogoče spremljati.
Sunny Energy also submitted that it had contacted the customer referred to in recital 27 above and received the full payment of that invoice.
Poleg tega te zaveze ne odpravljajo ugotovljenega vzorca trgovanja, ki je potekalo v daljšem časovnem obdobju.
The Commission notes these steps taken by Sunny Energy, which, however, took place after the problem was spotted by the Commission.
Pripombe druge zainteresirane strani
Sales from a warehouse in the Union
Ena od zainteresiranih strani je trdila, da sta družbi Chint Solar in Sunny Energy sistematično prodajali zadevni izdelek pod MIP ali pa se drugače izogibali MIP.
Sunny Energy also submitted that it is ready to stop sales of ‘other products’ from the bonded warehouse in the Union referred to in recital 25 above to avoid the potential risk of cross-compensation.
Zainteresirana stran je pozvala k umiku teh družb iz zaveze.
The Commission concluded that although this commitment would address the risk of cross-compensation, it would not be possible to monitor such a commitment.
Poleg tega je zainteresirana stran navedla, da število podjetij, umaknjenih iz zaveze, potrjuje vtis, ki prevladuje na trgu, da je bila zaveza kršena v širšem obsegu.
Moreover, these commitments do not address the identified pattern of trade which took place over a substantial period of time.
Komisija opozarja, da je zainteresirana stran v svojem stališču predložila neutemeljene predpostavke.
Comments by the other interested party
Komisija s spremljanjem ni razkrila nobene sistematične kršitve s strani velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali CCCME.
One interested party submitted that Chint Solar and Sunny Energy have been systematically selling the product concerned below the MIP or otherwise circumventing it.
Sklepi
The interested party urged for the withdrawal of these companies from the undertaking.
Komisija zato potrjuje svoje ugotovitve o kršitvah zaveze s strani družb Chint Solar in Sunny Energy.
In addition, the interested party submitted that the number of companies withdrawn from the undertaking confirms the market experience that the undertaking has been violated on a broad scale.
H. UMIK SPREJETJA ZAVEZE IN NALOŽITEV DOKONČNIH DAJATEV
The Commission points out that the interested party made unsubstantiated assumptions in its submission.
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 8(7) in členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe ter členom 13(7) in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe ter tudi v skladu s pogoji zaveze sklenila, da se sprejetje zaveze za družbi Chint Solar in Sunny Energy umakne.
The monitoring of the Commission has not revealed any systematic breaches by a major number of exporting producers or the CCCME.
V skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe se dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013, in dokončna izravnalna dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013, začneta avtomatično uporabljati za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK ali ki je od tam poslan, in ga proizvajata družbi Chint Solar (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B810) in Sunny Energy (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B825) z dnem začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Conclusion
V informativne namene so v tabeli v Prilogi k tej uredbi navedeni proizvajalci izvozniki, za katere se sprejetje zaveze z Izvedbenim sklepom 2014/657/EU ne spremeni –
The Commission therefore upholds its findings on breaches of the undertaking for Chint Solar and Sunny Energy.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
H. WITHDRAWAL OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING AND IMPOSITION OF DEFINITIVE DUTIES
Člen 1
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(7) and 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, Article 13(7) and 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and also in accordance with the terms of the undertaking, the Commission has concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking for Chint Solar and Sunny Energy shall be withdrawn.
Sprejetje zaveze z Izvedbenim sklepom 2013/707/EU v zvezi z družbami (i) Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co.
Accordingly, under Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 automatically apply to imports originating in or consigned from the PRC of the product concerned and produced by Chint Solar (TARIC additional code: B810) and Sunny Energy (TARIC additional code: B825) as of the day of entry into force of this Regulation.
Ltd skupaj z njenimi povezanimi družbami v Evropski uniji, ki so združeno zajete z dodatno oznako TARIC: B810, in (ii) Hangzhou Zhejiang University Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co.
For information purposes the table in the Annex to this Regulation lists the exporting producers for whom the acceptance of the undertaking by Implementing Decision 2014/657/EU is not affected,
Ltd ter Zhejiang Jinbest Energy Science and Technology Co.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Ltd, ki sta združeno zajeti z dodatno oznako TARIC: B825, se s tem umakne.
Acceptance of the undertaking by Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU in relation to (i) Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co.
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Ltd together with its related companies in the European Union, jointly covered by the TARIC additional code: B810, (ii) Hangzhou Zhejiang University Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
Ltd and Zhejiang Jinbest Energy Science and Technology Co.
V Bruslju, 11. novembra 2015
Ltd, jointly covered by the TARIC additional code: B825 is hereby withdrawn.
Za Komisijo
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
UL L 188, 18.7.2009, str. 93.
Done at Brussels, 11 November 2015.
UL L 152, 5.6.2013, str. 5.
For the Commission
UL L 209, 3.8.2013, str. 26.
The President
UL L 209, 3.8.2013, str. 1.
OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.
UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str. 1.
OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.
UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str. 66.
OJ L 152, 5.6.2013, p. 5.
UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str. 214.
OJ L 209, 3.8.2013, p. 26.
UL L 270, 11.9.2014, str. 6.
OJ L 209, 3.8.2013, p. 1.
UL L 139, 5.6.2015, str. 30.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 1.
UL L 218, 19.8.2015, str. 1.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 66.
Sklep 2013/423/EU.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 214.
Izvedbeni sklep 2013/707/EU.
OJ L 270, 11.9.2014, p. 6.
PRILOGA
OJ L 139, 5.6.2015, p. 30.
Seznam družb:
OJ L 218, 19.8.2015, p. 1.
Ime družbe
Decision 2013/423/EU.
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU.
Povezane družbe družbe Chint Solar v Uniji, navedene v uvodni izjavi 5(a), so zajeti izdelek v letih 2013 in 2014 prodajale neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2019
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2019
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2026
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2026
of 12 November 2015
z dne 12. novembra 2015
Done at Brussels, 12 November 2015.
V Bruslju, 12. novembra 2015
amending Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on persistent organic pollutants as regards Annex I
o spremembi Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 850/2004 o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih glede Priloge I
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on persistent organic pollutants and amending Directive 79/117/EEC [1], and in particular Article 14(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 850/2004 z dne 29. aprila 2004 o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih in spremembi Direktive 79/117/EGS [1] ter zlasti člena 14(3) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 implements in the law of the Union the commitments set out in the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants approved by Council Decision 2006/507/EC [2] and in the 1998 Aarhus Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants (hereinafter ‘the Protocol’) to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants (hereinafter ‘CLRTAP’) approved by Council Decision 2004/259/EC [3].
Uredba (ES) št. 850/2004 v pravo Unije prenaša zaveze iz Stockholmske konvencije o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih, ki je bila potrjena s Sklepom Sveta 2006/507/ES [2] in iz Aarhuškega protokola iz leta 1998 o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol) h Konvenciji iz leta 1979 o onesnaževanju zraka na velike razdalje preko meja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CLRTAP), ki je bil potrjen s Sklepom Sveta 2004/259/ES [3].
Decision 2009/2 [4], adopted by the CLRTAP Executive Body at its 27th Session from 14 to 18 December 2009, identified short-chain chlorinated paraffins (hereinafter ‘SCCPs’) as a persistent organic pollutant.
Izvršilni organ CLRTAP je v odločitvi 2009/2 [4], ki jo je sprejel na svojem 27. zasedanju med 14. in 18. decembrom 2009, opredelil klorirane parafine s kratkimi verigami (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SCCP) kot obstojna organska onesnaževala.
As such, they were added to the Protocol for elimination, subject to two exemptions: use as fire retardants in rubber used in conveyor belts in the mining industry or in dam sealants.
Kot taki so bili vključeni v Protokol za odpravo, z dvema izjemama: kadar se uporabljajo kot zaščitna sredstva proti ognju za gumo, ki se uporablja v transportnih trakovih v rudarski industriji, ali za tesnilna sredstva pri jezovih.
Decision 2009/2 obliges the Parties to the Protocol to eliminate these two uses once suitable alternatives are available.
Odločitev 2009/2 zavezuje pogodbenice Protokola, da odpravijo ti uporabi, ko bodo na voljo ustrezni nadomestki.
2/EC was implemented in the law of the Union by Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2012 [5], which listed SCCPs in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004.
Odločitev 2009/2 v pravo Unije prenaša Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 519/2012 [5], ki SCCP navaja v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 850/2004.
The SCCPs entry in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 provides for derogation for the production, placing on the market, and use of SCCPs in conveyor belts in the mining industry and in dam sealants.
V vnosu za SCCP v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 850/2004 je določeno odstopanje za proizvodnjo, dajanje v promet in uporabo SCCP v transportnih trakovih v rudarski industriji in v tesnilnih sredstvih pri jezovih.
To comply with Decision 2009/2, according to that entry, as soon as new information on details of uses and safer alternative substances or technologies become available, the Commission must review the derogations with a view to phasing out the remaining uses of SCCPs.
Takoj, ko so na voljo nove informacije o podrobnostih uporab in varnejših nadomestnih snoveh ali tehnologijah, mora Komisija za izpolnitev zahtev iz odločitve 2009/2 ponovno pregledati odstopanja, da se postopoma opustijo še preostale uporabe SCCP.
Such review, whilst mandated by Decision 2009/2, is in line with Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 850/2004.
Tak pregled je določen v odločitvi 2009/2 in hkrati v skladu s členom 14(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 850/2004.
In accordance with Decision 2009/2 and the SCCPs entry in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004, the review of the exemptions should focus on the existence of suitable alternatives for the two remaining uses.
Pregled izjem bi se moral v skladu z odločitvijo 2009/2 in vnosom za SCCP v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 850/2004 osredotočiti na obstoj ustreznih nadomestkov za preostali uporabi.
Once such alternatives are identified, the exemptions should be deleted from the entry.
Izjemi bi bilo treba izbrisati iz vnosa, ko se ugotovita ustrezna nadomestka.
In 2010 the Netherlands submitted a dossier on SCCPs entitled ‘Evaluation of possible restrictions on short chain chlorinated paraffins’ (hereinafter ‘the dossier’) [6].
Leta 2010 je Nizozemska predložila dokumentacijo o SCCP z naslovom Ocena morebitnih omejitev kloriranih parafinov s kratkimi verigami (v nadaljnjem besedilu: dokumentacija) [6].
The dossier identifies a number of alternatives which could be used instead of SCCPs in conveyor belts in the mining industry and in dam sealants.
V njej se navaja vrsta nadomestkov za SCCP v transportnih trakovih v rudarski industriji in v tesnilnih sredstvih pri jezovih.
The dossier takes into the consideration the outcome of a public consultation which was conducted during its preparation by the Netherlands.
V dokumentaciji so upoštevani rezultati javnega posvetovanja, ki je bilo izvedeno med njeno pripravo na Nizozemskem.
Among the various alternatives identified, the most well-known are the medium- and long-chain chlorinated paraffins (MCCPs and LCCPs), with MCCPs appearing to be the alternative of choice for the vast majority of users.
Med različnimi ugotovljenimi nadomestki so najbolj znani klorirani parafini s srednjimi in dolgimi verigami (MCCP in LCCP), pri čemer se zdi, da velika večina uporabnikov daje prednost kloriranim parafinom s srednjimi verigami.
Both MCCPs and LCCPs combine performance characteristics that resemble those of SCCPs.
Tako MCCP kot LCCP združujejo značilnosti, podobne značilnostim SCCP.
Other available alternatives include substances such as organophosphate flame retardants and phosphate plasticisers, inorganic flame retardants and several others.
Drugi razpoložljivi nadomestki vključujejo snovi, kot so organofosforni zaviralci gorenja in fosfatna mehčala, anorganski zaviralci gorenja in mnoge druge.
In the course of that public consultation, it has been suggested by some European companies that a transition to alternatives may not necessarily be smooth and reformulation could take a considerable time.
V okviru navedenega javnega posvetovanja so nekatera evropska podjetja napovedala, da prehod na nadomestke ne bo nujno lahek in da bi lahko reformulacija trajala precej časa.
However, examples show that there are European companies that have begun using alternatives without major difficulties.
Vendar primeri kažejo, da obstajajo evropska podjetja, ki so brez večjih težav začela z uporabo nadomestkov.
With particular regard to the two applications that are exempt under Regulation (EC) No 850/2004, a major manufacturer of the conveyor belts has indicated that transition to MCCPs was smooth and incurred only low cost.
Večji proizvajalec transportnih trakov je v zvezi z uporabama, izvzetima v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 850/2004, navedel, da je prehod na MCCP potekal gladko in predstavljal le majhen strošek.
At the time of the preparation of the same consultation, two other companies were working on alternatives.
Med javnim posvetovanjem sta še dve drugi podjetji delovali na področju nadomestnih rešitev.
In 2013 the Commission consulted with the relevant stakeholders in the mining industry.
Leta 2013 se je Komisija posvetovala z ustreznimi deležniki v rudarski industriji.
The consultation indicated that conveyer belts containing SCCPs are no longer used by the industry for mining purposes.
Med posvetovanjem se je izkazalo, da se transportni trakovi z SCCP v rudarski industriji ne uporabljajo več.
With regard to dam sealants containing SCCPs, they do not appear to be manufactured, placed on the market or used in the Union.
Zdi se, da se tesnilna sredstva pri jezovih, ki vsebujejo SCCP, v Uniji ne proizvajajo, ne dajejo v promet in ne uporabljajo.
Indeed, already in 2008 the relevant stakeholders indicated to the European Chemicals Agency [7] that SCCPs do not appear to be in use or are in the process of being phased out in sealants (including dam sealants) in Europe.
Dejansko so že leta 2008 ustrezni deležniki Evropski agenciji za kemikalije [7] sporočili, da SCCP v Evropi niso več v uporabi za tesnilna sredstva oziroma se njihova uporaba postopoma opušča (vključno s tesnilnimi sredstvi za jezove).
In June 2012, the only known entity that registered manufacture of SCCPs under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council [8] declared that they had stopped and do not intend to restart manufacture of the substances.
Junija 2012 je edini subjekt, ki je registriral proizvodnjo SCCP v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8], izjavil, da je ustavil proizvodnjo snovi in da je ne namerava ponovno zagnati.
There are suitable alternatives to the use of SCCPs in conveyor belts in the mining industry and in dam sealants.
Ustrezni nadomestki uporabi SCCP v transportnih trakovih v rudarski industriji in v tesnilnih sredstvih pri jezovih obstajajo.
Consequently, the Commission is obliged by Decision 2009/2 and the review clause in the SCCPs entry in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 to eliminate those two uses.
Zato mora Komisija v skladu z odločitvijo 2009/2 in klavzulo ponovnega pregleda v vnosu za SCCP v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 850/2004 ti uporabi odpraviti.
Although the industry appears to have voluntarily phased out those two uses, the exemptions in the entry should be deleted to ensure full compliance with the thrust of the international agreement to eliminate the use of persistent organic pollutants.
Čeprav se zdi, da sta bili uporabi v industriji prostovoljno postopoma opuščeni, bi bilo treba izjemi izbrisati iz vnosa, da bi se tako zagotovilo dosledno upoštevanje zagona mednarodnega sporazuma o odpravi uporabe obstojnih organskih onesnaževal.
It is also necessary to clarify that, with regard to SCCPs, the prohibition in Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 does not apply to conveyor belts in the mining industry and dam sealants already in use before or on the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Treba je pojasniti tudi, da se prepoved iz člena 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 850/2004 glede SCCP ne uporablja za transportne trakove v rudarski industriji in za tesnilna sredstva pri jezovih, ki so bili v uporabi pred ali na datum začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
It is furthermore necessary to clarify that articles that contain SCCP in concentrations lower than 0,15 % by weight are allowed to be placed on the market and used, as this is the amount of SCCP that may be present as an impurity in an article produced with MCCP.
Poleg tega je treba pojasniti tudi, da sta dovoljena dajanje na trg in uporaba izdelkov, ki vsebujejo SCCP v koncentracijah, nižjih od 0,15 mas. %, saj je ta količina SCCP lahko kot nečistoča prisotna v izdelkih, proizvedenih z MCCP.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Council Directive 67/548/EEC [9],
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega z Direktivo Sveta 67/548/EGS [9], –
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga I k Uredbi (ES) št. 850/2004 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
Council Decision 2006/507/EC of 14 October 2004 concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (OJ L 209, 31.7.2006, p. 1).
Sklep Sveta 2006/507/ES z dne 14. oktobra 2004 o sklenitvi, v imenu Evropske skupnosti, Stockholmske konvencije o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih (UL L 209, 31.7.2006, str.
Council Decision 2004/259/EC of 19 February 2004 concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants (OJ L 81, 19.3.2004, p. 35).
1).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2012 of 19 June 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on persistent organic pollutants as regards Annex I (OJ L 159, 20.6.2012, p. 1).
Sklep Sveta 2004/259/ES z dne 19. februarja 2004 o sklenitvi Protokola o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih h Konvenciji iz leta 1979 o onesnaževanju zraka na velike razdalje preko meja v imenu Evropske skupnosti (UL L 81, 19.3.2004, str.
‘Evaluation of possible restrictions on short chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs)’, prepared for the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), the Netherlands, RPA July 2010.
35).
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 519/2012 z dne 19. junija 2012 o spremembi Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 850/2004 o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih glede Priloge I (UL L 159, 20.6.2012, str. 1).
Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (OJ 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1).
Ocena morebitnih omejitev kloriranih parafinov s kratkimi verigami (Evaluation of Possible Restrictions on Short Chain Chlorinated Paraffins – SCCPs), ki jo je po naročilu nizozemskega nacionalnega inštituta za javno zdravje in okolje (RIVM) julija 2010 izvedla družba RPA.
ANNEX
Uredba (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH) ter o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije in o spremembi Direktive 1999/45/ES ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 793/93 in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1488/94 ter Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS in direktiv Komisije 91/155/EGS, 93/67/EGS, 93/105/ES in 2000/21/ES (UL L 396, 30.12.2006, str. 1).
In Part B of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004, the entry for Alkanes C10-C13, chloro (short-chain chlorinated paraffins) (SCCPs) is replaced by the following:
Direktiva Sveta 67/548/EGS z dne 27. junija 1967 o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov v zvezi z razvrščanjem, pakiranjem in označevanjem nevarnih snovi (UL 196, 16.8.1967, str. 1).
‘Alkanes C10-C13, chloro (short-chain chlorinated paraffins) (SCCPs)
PRILOGA
By way of derogation, the production, placing on the market and use of substances or preparations containing SCCPs in concentrations lower than 1 % by weight or articles containing SCCPs in concentrations lower than 0,15 % by weight shall be allowed.
V delu B Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 850/2004 se vnos za klorirane alkane, C10–C13 (klorirani parafini s kratkimi verigami – SCCP) nadomesti z naslednjim:
Use shall be allowed in respect of:
„Klorirani alkani, C10–C13 (klorirani parafini s kratkimi verigami – SCCP)
conveyor belts in the mining industry and dam sealants containing SCCPs already in use before or on 4 December 2015; and
Z odstopanjem se dovoli proizvodnja, dajanje v promet in uporaba snovi ali pripravkov, ki vsebujejo SCCP v koncentracijah, nižjih od 1 mas. %, ali izdelkov, ki vsebujejo SCCP v koncentracijah, nižjih od 0,15 mas. %.