natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
One Chinese producer claimed that the undercutting margin of 18 % established for Chinese imports made under the inward processing regime was incorrect since the prices of Union producers included an ‘inbuilt 7,5 % normal tariff’ which the domestic users could not obtain relief from should they incorporate AHF manufactured in the Union in exports to third countries.
Ne glede na to je treba opozoriti, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 113, da za uvoz, opravljen v okviru postopka aktivnega oplemenitenja, ne velja carina.
However the interested party did not substantiate the claim and in particular failed to explain the notion of ‘inbuilt normal tariff’.
Zato ne bi bilo upravičeno izvesti prilagoditev za carine, ki se ne zaračunavajo.
In any event it is recalled that, as explained in recital 113, imports made under the inward processing regime are not subject to customs duty.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da je Komisija ustrezno uporabila prilagoditev za carino pri določanju stopnje nelojalnega nižanja cen za uvoz v okviru običajnega režima iz uvodne izjave 114 in za celoten kitajski uvoz ne glede na uvozni režim iz uvodne izjave 115.
Therefore it would not be justified to make adjustments for customs duties that are not borne.
Zato je bila trditev zavrnjena.
It must be noted also that the Commission duly applied the adjustment for customs duty when establishing the undercutting margin for imports made under the normal regime in recital 114 and for all Chinese imports irrespective of the import regime in recital 115.
Isti kitajski proizvajalec je trdil, da je treba odšteti carinsko stopnjo od 12,2-odstotne oziroma 10,2-odstotne stopnje nelojalnega nižanja cen iz uvodnih izjav 114 in 115.
Therefore the claim was rejected.
Vendar je pojasnjeno, da je Komisija pri določanju teh stopenj že upoštevala carino, ki se uporablja za uvoz v okviru običajnega režima.
The same Chinese producer claimed that it was necessary to deduct the customs duty rate from the undercutting margins of 12,2 % and 10.2 % established respectively in recitals 114 and 115.
Uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav
It is however clarified that in order to establish these margins the Commission already took into account the customs duty applicable to imports made under the normal regime.
Preglednica 4
Import from other third countries
Uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav (vsi uvozni režimi)
Table 4
Vir: Eurostat, podatki v zvezi z Rusijo, ki so bili zbrani in objavljeni v vzporedni preiskavi.
Imports from other third countries (all imports regimes)
Država
Source: Eurostat, data regarding Russia established and published in the parallel investigation.
Obseg (v tonah)
Volume (tonnes)
[19532–26078]
Russia
[23243–34422]
[19532-26078]
[27345–39116]
[23243-34422]
[26368–37812]
[27345-39116]
[119–132]
[26368-37812]
[140–150]
[119-132]
[135–145]
[140-150]
[2145–2650]
[135-145]
[2038–2624]
[2145-2650]
[1952–2571]
[2038-2624]
[1973–2597]
[1952-2571]
[95–99]
[1973-2597]
[91–97]
[95-99]
[92–98]
[91-97]
Turčija
[219-233]
Druge tretje države (Kitajska ni vključena)
[61-80]
Skupaj
[102-115]
[29000–35000]
Total
[33000–43000]
[29000-35000]
[41000–54000]
[33000-43000]
[42000–56000]
[41000-54000]
[113–125]
[42000-56000]
[142–155]
[113-125]
[145–160]
[142-155]
V obravnavanem obdobju se je uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav v Unijo povečal za 45 % do 60 %, kar je hitreje od rasti potrošnje Unije.
[145-160]
Tržni delež drugih tretjih držav se je v tem obdobju tako povečal z 41 % na 51 %.
During the period considered, imports from other third countries into the Union increased by between 45 % and 60 % which is faster than the progression of the Union consumption.
Uvoz iz Brazilije se v obravnavanem obdobju ni izvajal.
The market share of the other third countries therefore increased from 41 % to 51 % over this period.
Obseg uvoza iz Rusije se je od leta 2011 do leta 2013 povečal med 40 % in 50 %, v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom pa rahlo zmanjšal.
There were no imports from Brazil during the period considered.
Ustrezni tržni delež se je povečal z 29 % leta 2011 na 34 % leta 2012, nato pa je do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ostal nespremenjen.
Import volumes from Russia increased between 40 % and 50 % from 2011 until 2013 with a slight decrease in the review investigation period.
Obseg uvoza iz Turčije se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečal med 125 % in 139 %, njegov tržni delež pa s približno 7 % na 13 %.
The corresponding market share increased from 29 % in 2011 to 34 % in 2012 and then remained constant until the end of the review investigation period.
Turške uvozne cene so se v obravnavanem obdobju znižale za 13 %, vendar so ostale nad ravnjo cene uvoza iz drugih tretjih držav, vključno z Rusijo in Kitajsko, in so bile v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom na podobnih ravneh kot cene industrije Unije.
During the period considered import volumes from Turkey increased between 125 % and 139 % and their market share increased from around 7 % to 13 %.
Skupno povečanje uvoza iz drugih tretjih držav, razen LRK, Rusije in Turčije, je bilo 2- do 15-odstotno.
Turkish import prices decreased by 13 % over the period considered but remained above the price level of imports from other third countries, including Russia and China, and were at similar levels as the Union's industry prices during the review investigation period.
Ko pa se je potrošnja Unije povečala, se je njegov celotni tržni delež zmanjšal s 4 % leta 2011 na približno 2 % leta 2013, nato pa do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom povečal na 4 %; njegove cene so bile nižje od cen industrije Unije, razen leta 2012.
Overall, imports from other third countries excluding PRC, Russia and Turkey increased between 2 % and 15 %.
Cene uvoza iz drugih tretjih držav so bile v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju višje od cen uvoza iz LRK.
However, as the Union consumption increased, their total market share decreased from 4 % in 2011 to around 2 % in 2013 and then increased to 4 % by the end of the review investigation period; their prices were at lower levels than the Union industry's prices, with the exception of 2012.
En kitajski proizvajalec je trdil, da bi morala analiza uvoza iz drugih tretjih držav, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, iz uvodnih izjav 118 do 121 vključevati celoten trg folij, namesto da se je osredotočala na zadevni izdelek, saj so odločitve proizvajalcev Unije glede drugih vrst folije domnevno vplivale na njihovo proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka.
The prices of imports from the other third countries were higher than the prices of imports from the PRC during the entire period considered.
Ta trditev ni bila utemeljena.
One Chinese producer claimed that the Commission's analysis of the imports from other third countries in recitals 118-121 should have encompassed the entire foil market instead of focusing on the product concerned since decisions made by Union producers in respect of other types of foil allegedly influence their production of the product concerned.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 185, se je s preiskavo vsekakor ugotovilo, da je največji vzorčeni proizvajalec AHF iz Unije proizvajal izključno AHF in da proizvajalci Unije, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da proizvajajo AHF in drugo vrsto folije, imenovano konverterska aluminijasta folija („ACF“), niso mogli brez težav preiti s proizvodnje enega izdelka na proizvodnjo drugega, saj je bila za povečanje učinkovitosti potrebna proizvodnja obeh izdelkov v določenem obsegu.
The claim was not substantiated.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 185, je preiskava tudi pokazala, da so imeli vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije v obravnavanem obdobju stabilno razmerje proizvodnje teh vrst folije.
In any event the investigation established, as mentioned in recital 185, that the largest sampled Union producer of AHF was producing solely AHF and that Union producers found to produce both AHF and another type of foil named aluminium converter foil (‘ACF’) could not switch easily from producing one product to the other, as the production of both products in certain quantities was needed in order to maximise efficiency.
En kitajski proizvajalec je poudaril, da so morali uporabniki uvažati AHF od proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz tretjih držav, saj je proizvodna zmogljivost proizvajalcev Unije predstavljala manj kot 50 % potrošnje Unije.
As mentioned in recital 185 the investigation further showed that the sampled Union producers had a stable ratio of production between these types of foil during the period considered.
Na podlagi tega je kitajski proizvajalec trdil, da so proizvajalci izvozniki pri oskrbovanju uporabnikov, ki jih niso oskrbovali proizvajalci Unije, konkurirali med seboj in ne proizvajalcem Unije.
One Chinese producer noted that since the production capacity of the Union producers represented less than 50 % of the Union consumption it was necessary for users to import AHF from exporting producers in third countries.
Vendar ta trditev ni bila utemeljena.
On that basis the Chinese producer claimed that exporting producers were competing between themselves and not with the Union producers when supplying users not served by the Union producers.
Prvič, domneva, da je proizvodna zmogljivost proizvajalcev Unije predstavljala manj kot 50 % potrošnje Unije, ni pravilna.
The claim was however not substantiated.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 106 in 129, je proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Unije v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom predstavljala od 58 % do 74 % potrošnje Unije in je bila v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju večja od 55 %.
First, the allegation that the production capacity of the Union producers represented less than 50 % of the Union consumption is incorrect.
Poleg tega, kot je prikazano v preglednici 5, je bilo s preiskavo ugotovljeno, da je imela industrija Unije v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju prosto zmogljivost, ki bi se lahko izkoristila za oskrbovanje trga Unije, če dejansko ne bi bilo konkurenčnega dampinškega uvoza.
As shown in recitals 106 and 129 the Union industry's production capacity represented between 58 % and 74 % of the Union consumption during the review investigation period and was above 55 % during the entire period considered.
Uvoz iz tretjih držav je tudi konkuriral s podobnim izdelkom, ki ga je proizvajala industrija Unije, saj so obstoječe stranke proizvajalcev Unije lahko prešle na dobavitelje iz tretjih držav.
In addition, as shown in Table 5, the investigation established that the Union industry had spare capacity during the entire period considered that could have been used to serve the Union market if indeed, there had been no competing dumped imports.
Gospodarski položaj industrije Unije
Furthermore, imports from third countries were also in competition with the like product produced by the Union industry since existing customers of the Union producers were able to switch to suppliers from third countries.
Splošne opombe
General remarks
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 18, je bilo vzorčenje uporabljeno za določitev morebitne škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
In accordance with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined all economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Union industry.
Komisija je za določitev škode razlikovala med makro- in mikroekonomskimi kazalniki škode.
As mentioned in recital 18, sampling was used for the determination of possible injury suffered by the Union industry.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 103, je Komisija makroekonomske kazalnike, povezane s celotno industrijo Unije, ocenila na podlagi informacij, ki so jih zagotovili vložniki in ki so bile ustrezno preverjene za vzorčene družbe.
For the injury determination the Commission distinguished between macroeconomic and microeconomic injury indicators.
Komisija je ocenila le tiste mikroekonomske kazalnike, povezane z vzorčenimi družbami na podlagi podatkov iz vprašalnikov, ki so jih izpolnili vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije.
As explained in recital 103, the Commission evaluated macroeconomic indicators relating to the whole Union industry on the basis of information provided by the applicants which was duly verified for the sampled companies.
Za oba sklopa podatkov je bilo ugotovljeno, da sta za gospodarski položaj industrije Unije reprezentativna.
The Commission evaluated microeconomic indicators relating only to the sampled companies on the basis of data contained in the questionnaire replies of the sampled Union producers.
Makroekonomski kazalniki so: proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost, izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, obseg prodaje, tržni delež, rast, zaposlenost, produktivnost in višina stopnje dampinga.
Both sets of data were found representative of the economic situation of the Union industry.
Mikroekonomski kazalniki so: povprečne cene na enoto, stroški na enoto, stroški dela, zaloge, dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe, donosnost naložb in zmožnost zbiranja kapitala.
The macroeconomic indicators are: production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, sales volume, market share, growth, employment, productivity and magnitude of the dumping margin.
Makroekonomski kazalniki
The total Union production, production capacity and capacity utilisation developed over the period considered as follows:
Celotna proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti industrije Unije
Table 5
Vir: izpolnjeni vprašalniki in informacije, ki so jih predložili vložniki.
Union industry's total production, production capacity and capacity utilisation
Obseg proizvodnje (v tonah)
Source: questionnaire replies, information provided by the applicants.
Proizvodna zmogljivost (v tonah)
Production volume (tonnes)
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti
Production capacity (tonnes)
Obseg proizvodnje se je v obravnavanem obdobju spreminjal.
Capacity utilisation
Med letoma 2011 in 2013 se je povečal, vendar se je med letom 2013 in obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zmanjšal.
Production fluctuated during the period considered.
Skupaj se je obseg proizvodnje v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 7 %.
While it increased between 2011 and 2013, it decreased between 2013 and the review investigation period.
Proizvodna zmogljivost se je v obravnavnem obdobju povečala za 12 %.
Overall, the production volume increased by 7 % during the period considered.
Ker se je proizvodna zmogljivost bolj povečala kot obseg proizvodnje, se je izkoriščenost zmogljivosti v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšala za 5 %.
The production capacity increased by 12 % during the period considered.
En kitajski proizvajalec je trdil, da zmogljivost obrata za proizvodnjo aluminijaste folije ne bi smela biti izražena v tonah, saj isti stroji v določenem obdobju proizvedejo različne količine folije, odvisno od njene debeline in širine.
As a result of the higher increase in production capacity than in production volume, the capacity utilisation decreased by 5 % over the period considered.
V odgovoru na to trditev se ne izpodbija, da lahko na zmogljivost obrata, izraženo v tonah, vpliva debelina ali širina proizvedenih folij.
One Chinese producer claimed that the capacity of an aluminium foil plant should not be expressed in tonnes since the same machinery produces different masses of foil in a given period of time depending on the thickness and width of the foil.
Vendar so bili uvoz zadevnega izdelka in nekateri dejavniki škode, kot so potrošnja, obseg prodaje in proizvodnja, določeni z uporabo ton kot merske enote.
In reply to this claim, it is not contested that the capacity of a plant expressed in tonnes can be influenced by the thickness or width of the manufactured foils.
Zaradi doslednosti se pri analizi škode za primerjavo uporablja enaka merska enota.
However, the imports of the product concerned and certain injury factors such as consumption, sales volume and production were established using tonnes as the unit of measurement.
Poleg tega s preiskavo niso bile ugotovljene spremembe nabora izdelkov proizvodnje industrije Unije, ki bi razveljavile uporabo ton kot merske enote.
It is a matter of consistency in the injury analysis to use the same measurement unit for comparison purposes.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da zainteresirane strani niso zagotovile kvantitativnih informacij, s katerimi bi dokazale, da bi druga merska enota spremenila analizo tega dejavnika škode.
Moreover, the investigation did not point to changes in the product mix of the Union industry production such as to invalidate the use of tonnes as the unit of measurement.
Obseg prodaje in tržni delež
It is also noted that the interested party concerned failed to provide any quantitative information showing that a different measurement unit would have changed the analysis of this injury factor.
Obseg prodaje in tržni delež industrije Unije sta se v obravnavanem obdobju gibala na naslednji način:
Sales volume and market share
Preglednica 6
The Union industry's sales volume and market share developed over the period considered as follows:
Obseg prodaje in tržni delež industrije Unije
Table 6
Vir: izpolnjeni vprašalniki, Eurostat, informacije, ki so jih predložili vložniki.
Union industry's sales volume and market share
Obseg prodaje (v tonah)
[104-114]
Obseg prodaje AHF se je v obravnavanem obdobju rahlo povečal.
[102-110]
Največ se je povečal med letoma 2011 in 2013, tj. med 4 % in 14 %.
Sales volume of AHF slightly increased over the period considered.
V obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom se je obseg prodaje zmanjšal; skupno povečanje obsega prodaje v obravnavanem obdobju je bilo 2- do 10-odstotno.
Sales volume increased mostly from 2011 to 2013, i.e. between 4 % and 14 %.
Povečanje obsega prodaje, ob upoštevanju vzporednega povečanja potrošnje in uvoza, pa je povzročilo zmanjšanje tržnega deleža industrije Unije s 55 % leta 2011 na 47 % v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, tj. zmanjšanje za 8 odstotnih točk v obravnavanem obdobju.
During the review investigation period the sales volume decreased; overall, sales volume increased between 2 % and 10 % during the period considered.
Rast
The increase in sales volumes, taking into account the parallel increase in consumption and the increase in imports led, however, to a decrease in market share of the Union industry from 55 % in 2011 to 47 % in the review investigation period, i.e. a decrease of 8 percentage points during the period considered.
Medtem ko se je potrošnja Unije v obravnavanem obdobju povečala za 17 % do 28 %, se je obseg prodaje industrije Unije povečal med 2 % in 10 %, kar je povzročilo izgubo tržnega deleža v višini 8 odstotnih točk.
While Union consumption increased by between 17 % and 28 % during the period considered, the sales volume of the Union industry increased between 2 % and 10 %, which translated in a loss of market share of 8 percentage points.
Zaposlenost in produktivnost sta se v obravnavanem obdobju gibali na naslednji način:
Employment and productivity
Preglednica 7
Table 7
Produktivnost (v tonah/zaposlenega)
Number of employees
Zaposlovanje v industriji Unije je v obravnavanem obdobju nihalo in se skupno rahlo povečalo za 2 %.
Productivity (tonnes/employee)
Produktivnost se je med letoma 2011 in 2013 povečala, ker se je proizvodnja povečala bolj kot zaposlovanje.
Employment of the Union industry fluctuated during the period considered and overall slightly increased by 2 %.
Produktivnost se je od leta 2013 do obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zmanjšala za 7 %, vendar je ostala večja kot na začetku obravnavanega obdobja leta 2011.
Between 2011 and 2013 productivity increased due to the higher increase in production than the increase in employment.
Višina stopnje dampinga in okrevanje od preteklega dampinga
From 2013 to the review investigation period, productivity decreased by 7 % but remained higher than at the beginning of the period considered in 2011.
Stopnja dampinga uvoza iz LRK je bila v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom 28,1-odstotna (glej uvodno izjavo 81), vendar je bil njen vpliv na položaj industrije Unije omejen zaradi veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov, ki so uspešno zmanjšali obseg dampinškega uvoza.
Magnitude of the dumping margin and recovery from past dumping
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno z vzporedno preiskavo, se je obseg dampinškega uvoza iz Rusije v obravnavanem obdobju sicer znatno povečal.
The dumping margin of imports from the PRC amounted to 28,1 % during the review investigation period (see recital 81) but its impact on the situation of the Union industry was limited due to the anti-dumping measures in force which successfully curbed the volume of dumped imports.
Zaradi tega uvoza je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo.
However, as established in the parallel investigation, the volume of dumped imports from Russia increased significantly during the period considered.
Zato industrija Unije kljub obstoječim protidampinškim ukrepom ni mogla okrevati.
These imports caused material injury to the Union industry.
Mikroekonomski kazalniki
Therefore the recovery of the Union industry was not possible despite the existence of the anti-dumping measures.
Cene in dejavniki, ki vplivajo na cene
Microeconomic indicators
Povprečne prodajne cene industrije Unije za nepovezane stranke v Uniji so se v obravnavanem obdobju gibale na naslednji način:
Prices and factors affecting prices
Preglednica 8
The average sales prices of the Union industry to unrelated customers in the Union developed over the period considered as follows:
Prodajne cene in stroški
Table 8
Vir: izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
Selling prices and costs
Povprečna prodajna cena na enoto v Uniji (EUR/tono)
Source: questionnaire replies.
Proizvodni stroški na enoto (EUR/tono)
Unit cost of production (EUR/tonne)
Stroški dela
The Union industry's average unit selling price to unrelated customers in the Union decreased continuously and overall by 11 % over the period considered.
Povprečni stroški dela industrije Unije so se v obravnavanem obdobju gibali na naslednji način:
Despite this decrease, unit cost of production remained above the average selling price of the Union industry and the Union industry could not cover its production cost by the selling price with the exception of 2013.
Preglednica 9
The parallel investigation established that the Union industry was not able to raise its selling price due to the price pressure exerted by the dumped imports from Russia.
Povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega (v EUR)
Labour costs
Od leta 2011 do obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom so se povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega pri vzorčenih proizvajalcih Unije znižali za 5 %.
The average labour costs of the Union industry developed over the period considered as follows:
Stroški dela so se med letoma 2011 in 2012 najprej povišali za 2 %, nato so se med letoma 2012 in 2013 znižali, v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom pa so ostali nespremenjeni.
Table 9
Zaloge
Average labour costs per employee (EUR)
Zaloge industrije Unije so se v obravnavanem obdobju gibale na naslednji način:
Between 2011 and the review investigation period, the average labour costs per employee of the sampled Union producers decreased by 5 %.
Preglednica 10
Labour cost first increased by 2 % between 2011 and 2012, then decreased between 2012 and 2013 and then remained stable during the review investigation period.
Končne zaloge
Inventories
Končne zaloge kot delež proizvodnje
Stock levels of the Union industry developed over the period considered as follows:
Zalog ni mogoče obravnavati kot pomemben kazalnik škode v tem sektorju, saj proizvodnja in prodaja temeljita predvsem na naročilih, zato proizvajalci običajno vzdržujejo omejene zaloge.
Table 10
Zato so gibanja zalog navedena zgolj informativno.
Closing stocks
Končne zaloge so se v obravnavanem obdobju na splošno povečale za 8 %.
Closing stocks as percentage of production
Medtem ko so se zaloge med letoma 2011 in 2013 povečale za 10 %, so se od leta 2013 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom rahlo zmanjšale.
Inventories cannot be considered as a relevant injury indicator in this sector, as production and sales are mainly based on orders and, accordingly, producers tend to hold limited stocks.
Končne zaloge kot delež proizvodnje so v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju ostale nespremenjene.
Therefore, the trends on inventories are given for information only.
Dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe, donosnost naložb in zmožnost zbiranja kapitala