natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If, by 31 December 2016, the total amount of the additional initial pre-financing paid on the basis of this paragraph in 2015 and 2016 to an operational programme by Fund, where applicable, is not covered by payment applications submitted by the certifying authority for that programme, Greece shall repay to the Commission the total amount of the additional initial pre-financing for that Fund paid to that programme.
Če do 31. decembra 2016 celotni znesek dodatnega začetnega predplačila, ki je bilo v letih 2015 in 2016 na podlagi tega odstavka izplačano za operativni program, kadar je to ustrezno, po posameznem skladu, ni zajet v zahtevkih za plačilo, ki so jih za ta program predložili organi za potrjevanje, Grčija Komisiji vrne celotni znesek dodatnega začetnega predplačila, kar zadeva navedeni sklad, izplačanega za ta program.
Those repayments shall not constitute a financial correction and shall not reduce support from the Funds or the EMFF to the operational programmes.
Ta vračila ne pomenijo finančnega popravka in ne zmanjšujejo podpore iz skladov ali ESPR za operativne programe.
The amounts repaid shall constitute internal assigned revenue in accordance with point (c) of Article 21(3) of the Financial Regulation.’;
Vrnjeni znesek se šteje za notranji namenski prejemek v skladu s točko (c) člena 21(3) finančne uredbe.“;
in Article 152, the following paragraphs are added:
v členu 152 se dodajo naslednji odstavki:
By way of derogation from Article 79(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, the ceiling for the cumulative total amount of pre-financing and interim payments made shall be 100 % of the contribution from the Funds to operational programmes for the Convergence and Regional competitiveness and employment objectives in Greece.
Z odstopanjem od člena 79(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 znaša zgornja meja za kumulativno vsoto predplačil in vmesnih plačil 100 % prispevka iz skladov za operativne programe v okviru ciljev ‚konvergenca‘ ter ‚regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje‘ v Grčiji.
By way of derogation from Articles 53(2) and 77(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 and notwithstanding the Commission decisions fixing the maximum rate and the maximum amount of the contribution from the Funds for each Greek operational programme and for each priority axis, interim payments and payments of the final balance shall be calculated by applying a maximum co-financing rate of 100 % to the eligible expenditure indicated for Greek operational programmes for the Convergence and Regional competitiveness and employment objectives under each priority axis in each statement of expenditure certified by the certifying authority.
Z odstopanjem od členov 53(2) in 77(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 in ne glede na sklepe Komisije o določitvi najvišje stopnje in najvišjega zneska prispevka iz skladov za posamezni grški operativni program in za vsako prednostno os se vmesna plačila in končna plačila izračunajo z uporabo največje stopnje sofinanciranja, tj. 100 % upravičenih izdatkov, ki jih organi za potrjevanje navedejo v vsakem izkazu o izdatkih za grške operativne programe za doseganje ciljev ‚konvergenca‘ ter ‚regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje‘ v okviru vsake prednostne osi.
Article 77(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 shall not apply to operational programmes in Greece.
Člen 77(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006 se ne uporablja za operativne programe v Grčiji.
Greece shall establish a mechanism to ensure that the additional amounts made available as a result of the measures set out in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this Article are used solely for payments to beneficiaries and operations for its operational programmes.
Grčija vzpostavi mehanizem, s katerim zagotovi, da se dodatni zneski, dani na voljo na podlagi ukrepov iz odstavkov 4 in 5 tega člena, uporabijo samo za plačila upravičencem za projekte, ki jih izvajajo v okviru operativnih programov.
Greece shall submit a report to the Commission on the implementation of paragraphs 4 and 5 of this Article by the end of 2016 and shall further report in the final implementation report to be submitted pursuant to point (a) of Article 89(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.’.
Grčija Komisiji predloži poročilo o izvajanju odstavkov 4 in 5 tega člena do konca leta 2016, nadalje pa ji poroča v končnem poročilu o izvajanju, ki ga predloži v skladu s točko (a) člena 89(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.“
Position of the European Parliament of 6 October 2015 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 8 October 2015.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 6. oktobra 2015 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 8. oktobra 2015.
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p.
Uredba (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o skupnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu, Evropskem kmetijskem skladu za razvoj podeželja in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo, o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1840
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1840
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Istarski pršut/Istrski pršut (PDO))
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Istarski pršut/Istrski pršut (ZOP))
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the application to register the name ‘Istarski pršut’, submitted by Croatia, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s členom 50(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 je bil zahtevek za registracijo imena „Istarski pršut“, ki ga je vložila Hrvaška, objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
By the notice of opposition of 30 August 2013 and the reasoned statement of opposition of 25 October 2013, Slovenia opposed to the registration under Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
V ugovoru z dne 30. avgusta 2013 in utemeljenem ugovoru z dne 25. oktobra 2013 je Slovenija nasprotovala registraciji v skladu s členom 51(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012.
By letters dated 7 February 2014, the Commission invited the interested parties to engage in appropriate consultations to seek agreement among themselves in accordance with their internal procedures.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 7. februarja 2014 zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj začnejo ustrezna posvetovanja, da bi dosegle dogovor v skladu s svojimi notranjimi postopki.
A three months extension of the deadline for consultations was additionally granted, in accordance with Article 51(3), third paragraph, of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012.
Poleg tega je bilo v skladu s tretjim pododstavkom člena 51(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 odobreno trimesečno podaljšanje roka za posvetovanja.
Slovenia alleged, among other things, that the registration of ‘Istarski pršut’ did not comply with the definition of a Protected Designation of Origin in so far as the geographical area for raw materials was larger than the defined geographical area.
Slovenija je med drugim trdila, da registracija proizvoda „Istarski pršut“ ni skladna z opredelitvijo zaščitene označbe porekla, saj je geografsko območje za surovine večje od opredeljenega geografskega območja.
In addition, Slovenia claimed that that registration would jeopardise the existence of ‘Istrski pršut’, i.e. the name used in Slovenia for a product having the same characteristics as ‘Istarski pršut’, and which had been legally on the market for more than five years preceding the date of the publication of the single document of ‘Istarski pršut’ in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Slovenija je trdila tudi, da bi navedena registracija ogrozila obstoj proizvoda „Istrski pršut“ (to ime se v Sloveniji uporablja za proizvod, ki ima enake značilnosti kot „Istarski pršut“), ki je bil zakonito na trgu več kot pet let pred datumom objave enotnega dokumenta za „Istarski pršut“ v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Several amendments to the product specification were made following the agreement.
Ime proizvoda „Istarski pršut“ je bilo spremenjeno v „Istarski pršut/Istrski pršut“, tako da vključuje tudi ime v slovenskem jeziku.
The Croatian application became a multi-country (Croatian and Slovenian) application.
Območje proizvodnje je bilo razširjeno, tako da zajema slovenski del istrskega polotoka.
The product name ‘Istarski pršut’ was changed into ‘Istarski pršut/Istrski pršut’, thus including also the name in the Slovenian language.
Nadalje so bile uvedene manjše prilagoditve drugih delov specifikacije proizvoda.
The production area was enlarged to comprise the Slovenian part of the Istrian Peninsula.
Ker je bil enotni dokument bistveno spremenjen, je Komisija v skladu s členom 51(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 ponovno pregledala zahtevek in ugotovila, da so pogoji za registracijo izpolnjeni.
Small adjustments were further introduced to other sections of the product specification.
V zvezi s hrvaškim delom območja je razlika med območjem za surovine in opredeljenim geografskim območjem ostala enaka kot v prvotnem zahtevku.
Since the single document had been substantially amended, in accordance with Article 51(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission repeated the scrutiny of the application and concluded that the conditions for registration were fulfilled.
Ker so vse zahteve iz člena 5(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 izpolnjene, je ime upravičeno do odstopanja iz navedenega člena in se lahko ustrezno registrira kot zaščitena označba porekla.
With respect to the Croatian part of the area, the difference between the area for raw materials and the defined geographical area was maintained as it was in the original application.
V skladu s členom 50(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 je bil zahtevek za registracijo imena „Istarski pršut/Istrski pršut“, ki sta ga vložili Hrvaška in Slovenija, objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
All the requirements listed in Article 5(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 being fulfilled, the name may benefit from the derogation set out in that Article and may accordingly be registered as Protected Designation of Origin.
Ker v skladu s členom 51 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Komisija ni prejela nobenega ugovora, bi bilo treba ime „Istarski pršut/Istrski pršut“ registrirati –
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the application to register the name ‘Istarski pršut/Istrski pršut’, submitted by Croatia and Slovenia, was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Istarski pršut/Istrski pršut’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Ime „Istarski pršut/Istrski pršut“ (ZOP) se registrira.
Article premier
Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The name ‘Istarski pršut/Istrski pršut’ (PDO) is registered.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V imenu predsednika
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Član Komisije
Done at Brussels, 7 October 2015.
UL L 343, 14.12.2012, str. 1.
For the Commission,
UL C 155, 1.6.2013, str. 3.
On behalf of the President,
UL L 186, 5.6.2015, str. 9.
Member of the Commission
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 z dne 13. junija 2014 o pravilih za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in živil (UL L 179, 19.6.2014, str. 36).
OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.
Ime iz prvega pododstavka opredeljuje proizvod iz skupine 1.2 Mesni proizvodi (kuhani, soljeni, dimljeni itn.) iz Priloge XI k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 668/2014 [4].Člen 2
OJ C 155, 1.6.2013, p. 3.
Po šestih mesecih posvetovanj je bil dosežen dogovor med Hrvaško in Slovenijo, o katerem je bila Komisija obveščena z dopisoma z dne 3. in 10. septembra 2014.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1841
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1841
Regulation (EU) 2015/1843 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2015/1843 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
laying down Union procedures in the field of the common commercial policy in order to ensure the exercise of the Union’s rights under international trade rules, in particular those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organization
o določitvi postopkov Unije na področju skupne trgovinske politike za zagotovitev izvrševanja pravic Unije po mednarodnih pravilih trgovanja, zlasti tistih, ki so dogovorjena v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije
Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 [3] has been substantially amended several times [4].
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 3286/94 [3] je bila večkrat bistveno spremenjena [4].
It is necessary that the common commercial policy be based on uniform principles, in particular with regard to commercial defence.
Skupna trgovinska politika mora temeljiti na enotnih načelih, zlasti glede trgovinske zaščite.
It appears necessary to provide for Union procedures to ensure the effective exercise of the rights of the Union under international trade rules.
Zdi se potrebno, da se določijo postopki Unije za zagotovitev učinkovitega izvrševanja pravic Unije na podlagi mednarodnih pravil trgovanja.
International trade rules are primarily those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organization (‘WTO’) and laid down in the Annexes to the WTO Agreement, but they can also include rules laid down in any other agreement to which the Union is a party and which are applicable to trade between the Union and third countries.
Mednarodna pravila trgovanja so prvenstveno tista, ki so dogovorjena v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) in določena v prilogah k Sporazumu STO, lahko pa vključujejo tudi tista, ki so določena v katerem koli drugem sporazumu, katerega pogodbenica je Unija, in ki se uporabljajo za trgovino med Unijo in tretjimi državam.
It is appropriate to give a clear idea of the types of agreements to which the term ‘international trade rules’ refers.
Primerno je, da se da jasna slika o vrstah sporazumov, na katere se nanaša pojem „mednarodna pravila trgovanja“.
Union procedures to ensure the effective exercise of the rights of the Union under international trade rules should be based on a legal mechanism under Union law which is fully transparent, and ensures that the decision to invoke the Union’s rights under international trade rules is taken on the basis of accurate factual information and legal analysis.
Postopki Unije za zagotovitev učinkovitega izvrševanja pravic Unije na podlagi mednarodnih pravil trgovanja bi morali temeljiti na pravnem mehanizmu v skladu s pravom Unije, ki je v celoti pregleden in zagotavlja, da se sklep o uveljavljanju pravic Unije na podlagi mednarodnih pravil trgovanja sprejme na podlagi točnih dejanskih informacij in pravne analize.
Such a mechanism should aim to provide procedural means for requesting that the Union institutions react to obstacles to trade that are adopted or maintained by third countries and which cause injury or otherwise adverse trade effects, provided that a right of action exists, in respect of such obstacles, under applicable international trade rules.
Cilj takega mehanizma bi moral zagotoviti postopkovna sredstva, s katerimi se zahteva, da institucije Unije ukrepajo proti trgovinskim oviram, ki jih sprejmejo ali ohranjajo tretje države in ki povzročajo škodo ali imajo druge škodljive učinke na trgovino, pod pogojem, da pravica do ukrepanja proti tovrstnim oviram obstaja na podlagi zadevnih mednarodnih pravil trgovanja.
The right of Member States to resort to such a mechanism should be without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to raise the same or similar matters through other existing Union procedures, and in particular before the committee established by Article 207(3) of the Treaty.
Pravica držav članic, da uporabijo tak mehanizem, ne sme posegati v njihovo možnost, da enake ali podobne zadeve sprožijo preko drugih obstoječih postopkov Unije in zlasti pred odborom, ustanovljenim s členom 207(3) Pogodbe.
Regard should be paid to the institutional role of the committee established by Article 207(3) of the Treaty in formulating advice for the institutions of the Union on all issues of commercial policy.
Institucionalno vlogo odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 207(3) Pogodbe, bi bilo treba upoštevati pri oblikovanju nasvetov za institucije Unije o vseh vprašanjih trgovinske politike.
Therefore, that committee should be kept informed of the development of individual cases, in order to enable it to consider their broader policy implications.
Zato bi bilo treba ta odbor obveščati o razvoju posameznih primerov, da bi mu omogočili, da pretehta njihove širše posledice na politiko.
It is appropriate to require that the Union act in compliance with its international obligations and, where such obligations result from agreements, that the Union maintain the balance of rights and obligations which it is the purpose of those agreements to establish.
Primerno je zahtevati, da Unija ravna v skladu s svojimi mednarodnimi obveznostmi in da, kadar tovrstne obveznosti izhajajo iz sporazumov, Unija ohranja ravnotežje med pravicami in obveznostmi, katerega vzpostavitev je namen teh sporazumov.
It is also appropriate to provide that any measures taken under the procedures in question should also be in conformity with the Union’s international obligations, as well as being without prejudice to other measures in cases not covered by this Regulation which might be adopted directly pursuant to Article 207 of the Treaty.
Poleg tega je primerno določiti, da bi morali biti vsi ukrepi, sprejeti na podlagi zadevnih postopkov, tudi v skladu z mednarodnimi obveznostmi Unije in ne bi smeli posegati v druge ukrepe, ki se lahko sprejmejo neposredno v skladu s členom 207 Pogodbe, v primerih, ki niso zajeti v tej uredbi.
The rules of procedure to be followed during the examination procedure provided for in this Regulation should also be laid down, in particular as regards the rights and obligations of the Union authorities and the parties involved, and the conditions under which interested parties may have access to information and may ask to be informed of the essential facts and considerations resulting from the examination procedure.
Treba bi bilo določiti tudi poslovnik, po katerem naj se ravna med postopkom pregleda, predvidenim s to uredbo, zlasti glede pravic in obveznosti organov Unije in udeleženih strank ter pogojev, pod katerimi imajo lahko zainteresirane strani dostop do informacij in lahko zaprosijo, da se jih obvešča o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, ki izhajajo iz postopka pregleda.
In acting pursuant to this Regulation, the Union has to bear in mind the need for rapid and effective action through the application of the decision-making procedures provided for in this Regulation.
Unija mora pri delovanju v skladu s to Uredbo upoštevati potrebo po hitrem in učinkovitem delovanju z uporabo postopkov odločanja, predvidenih s to uredbo.
It is incumbent on the Commission to act in respect of obstacles to trade that are adopted or maintained by third countries, within the framework of the Union’s international rights and obligations, only when the interests of the Union call for intervention.
Za Komisijo je obvezno, da proti trgovinskim oviram, ki jih sprejmejo ali ohranjajo tretje države, v okviru mednarodnih pravic in obveznosti Unije ukrepa samo takrat, kadar interesi Unije zahtevajo posredovanje.
When assessing such interests, the Commission should give due consideration to the views of all interested parties in the proceedings.
Komisija bi morala pri presoji takih interesov ustrezno upoštevati mnenja vseh zainteresiranih strani, udeleženih v postopkih.
The implementation of the examination procedures provided for in this Regulation requires uniform conditions for the adoption of decisions on the conduct of those examination procedures and measures resulting therefrom.
Za izvajanje postopkov pregleda, določenih v tej uredbi, so potrebni enotni pogoji za sprejetje sklepov o izvedbi postopkov pregleda ter ukrepov, ki izhajajo iz njih.
Those measures should be adopted in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5].
Te ukrepe bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5].
The advisory procedure should be used for the suspension of ongoing examinations given the effects of such measures and their sequential logic in relation to the adoption of measures.
Za prekinitev pregledov, ki se izvajajo, bi se moral glede na učinke takih ukrepov in njihovo zaporedno logiko v zvezi s sprejetjem dokončnih zaščitnih ukrepov uporabljati svetovalni postopek.
Moreover, in cases where an agreement with a third country appears to be the most appropriate means of resolving a dispute arising from an obstacle to trade, negotiations to this end should be conducted in accordance with the procedures established in Article 207 of the Treaty,
V primerih, kadar se izkaže, da je sporazum s tretjo državo najprimernejše sredstvo za rešitev spora, ki izhaja iz trgovinske ovire, bi bilo treba zadevna pogajanja opraviti v skladu s postopki, določenimi v členu 207 Pogodbe –
This Regulation provides for Union procedures in the field of the common commercial policy in order to ensure the exercise of the Union’s rights under international trade rules, in particular those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organization (‘WTO’) which, subject to compliance with existing international obligations and procedures, aim to:
Ta uredba določa postopke Unije na področju skupne trgovinske politike za zagotovitev izvrševanja pravic Unije po mednarodnih pravilih trgovanja, zlasti tistih, ki so dogovorjena v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO), ki so pod pogoji skladnosti z obstoječimi mednarodnimi obveznostmi in postopki usmerjeni k:
responding to obstacles to trade that have an effect on the market of the Union, with a view to removing the injury resulting therefrom;
ukrepanju proti trgovinskim oviram, ki vplivajo na trg Unije, da se odpravila škoda, ki je zaradi tega nastala;
responding to obstacles to trade that have an effect on the market of a third country, with a view to removing the adverse trade effects resulting therefrom.
ukrepanju proti trgovinskim oviram, ki vplivajo na trg tretje države, da se odpravi škodljive učinke na trgovino, ki so zaradi tega nastali.
The procedures referred to in the first paragraph shall be applied in particular to the initiation and subsequent conduct and termination of international dispute settlement procedures in the area of common commercial policy.
Postopki iz prvega odstavka se uporabljajo zlasti pri uvedbi, nadaljnjem vodenju in ustavitvi postopkov reševanja mednarodnih sporov na področju skupne trgovinske politike.