natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A notice shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union indicating the date of lodging of an application initiating proceedings, the names of the main parties, the form of order sought by the applicant and a summary of the pleas in law and of the main supporting arguments.
Člen 81
Article 80
Odgovor na tožbo
Service of the application
V dveh mesecih od vročitve tožbe toženi stranki ta vloži odgovor na tožbo, ki vsebuje:
The application shall be served on the defendant in the form of a certified copy sent by registered post with a form for acknowledgement of receipt or by personal delivery of the copy against a receipt.
ime in naslov tožene stranke;
Where the defendant has previously agreed to applications being served on him by the method referred to in Article 57(4) or by telefax, service of the application may be effected accordingly.
navajane pravne razloge in trditve;
In cases where Article 78(5) applies, service shall be effected as soon as the application has been put in order or the General Court has declared it admissible notwithstanding the failure to observe the requirements set out in that Article.
predloge tožene stranke;
Article 81
Za odgovor na tožbo se uporabljata člena 77 in 78, od (3) do (5).
Defence
Predsednik lahko v izrednih okoliščinah rok iz odstavka 1 na ustrezno obrazložen predlog tožene stranke podaljša.
Within two months after service on him of the application, the defendant shall lodge a defence, containing:
Člen 82
the name and address of the defendant;
Posredovanje dokumentov
the pleas in law and arguments relied on;
Kadar Evropski parlament, Svet in Evropska komisija niso stranka v postopku, jim Splošno sodišče pošlje prepis tožbe in odgovora na tožbo brez prilog, zato da lahko ugotovijo, ali se na podlagi člena 277 PDEU uveljavlja neuporaba enega od njihovih aktov.
the form of order sought by the defendant;
Člen 83
Article 77 and Article 78(3) to (5) shall apply to the defence.
Replika in duplika
The time limit laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article may, in exceptional circumstances, be extended by the President at the reasoned request of the defendant.
Tožba in odgovor na tožbo se lahko dopolnita z repliko tožeče stranke in dupliko tožene stranke, razen če Splošno sodišče odloči, da druga izmenjava vlog ni potrebna, ker je vsebina spisa v zadevi dovolj popolna.
Article 82
Kadar Splošno sodišče odloči, da druga izmenjava vlog ni potrebna, lahko glavnim strankam še dovoli, da dopolnijo spis v zadevi, če tožeča stranka v ta namen v dveh tednih od vročitve te odločbe vloži obrazložen predlog.
Transmission of documents
Predsednik določi roke za vložitev teh procesnih aktov.
Where the European Parliament, the Council or the European Commission is not a party to a case, the General Court shall send to them copies of the application and of the defence, without the annexes thereto, to enable them to assess whether the inapplicability of one of their acts is being invoked under Article 277 TFEU.
Opredeli lahko vprašanja, na katera naj bi se replika in duplika nanašali.
Article 83
RAZLOGI, DOKAZI IN PRILAGODITEV TOŽBE
Reply and rejoinder
Člen 84
The application initiating proceedings and the defence may be supplemented by a reply from the applicant and by a rejoinder from the defendant unless the General Court decides that a second exchange of pleadings is unnecessary because the contents of the file in the case are sufficiently comprehensive.
Novi razlogi
Where the General Court decides that a second exchange of pleadings is unnecessary it may authorise the main parties to supplement the file in the case if the applicant presents a reasoned request to that effect within two weeks from the service of that decision.
Navajanje novih razlogov med postopkom ni dovoljeno, razen če ti izhajajo iz pravnih in dejanskih okoliščin, ki so se razkrile med postopkom.
The President shall prescribe the time limits within which those procedural documents are to be produced.
Po potrebi se novi razlogi navedejo med drugo izmenjavo vlog in se kot taki opredelijo.
He may specify the matters to which the reply or the rejoinder should relate.
Če se za pravne in dejanske okoliščine, ki upravičujejo navajanje novih razlogov, izve po drugi izmenjavi vlog ali po odločitvi, da se ta izmenjava vlog ne dovoli, zadevna glavna stranka navede nove razloge, takoj ko za te okoliščine izve.
PLEAS IN LAW, EVIDENCE AND MODIFICATION OF THE APPLICATION
Brez poseganja v poznejšo odločbo Splošnega sodišča glede dopustnosti novih razlogov predsednik drugim strankam omogoči odgovor na te razloge.
New pleas in law
Dokazi in dokazni predlogi
No new plea in law may be introduced in the course of proceedings unless it is based on matters of law or of fact which come to light in the course of the procedure.
Dokazi se predložijo in dokazni predlogi podajo v okviru prve izmenjave vlog.
Any new pleas in law shall be introduced in the second exchange of pleadings and identified as such.
Glavne stranke lahko v utemeljitev svojih trditev dokaze predložijo ali dokazne predloge podajo še v repliki in dupliki, če upravičijo zamudo pri njihovi predložitvi oziroma podaji.
Where the matters of law or of fact justifying the introduction of new pleas in law are known after the second exchange of pleadings or after it has been decided not to authorise a second exchange of pleadings, the main party concerned shall introduce the new pleas in law as soon as those matters come to his knowledge.
Izjemoma lahko glavne stranke predložijo dokaze ali podajo dokazne predloge še pred koncem ustnega dela postopka ali pred odločitvijo Splošnega sodišča, da bo odločilo brez ustnega dela postopka, če upravičijo zamudo pri njihovi predložitvi oziroma podaji.
Without prejudice to the decision to be taken by the General Court on the admissibility of the new pleas in law, the President shall give the other parties an opportunity to respond to those pleas.
Brez poseganja v poznejšo odločbo Splošnega sodišča glede dopustnosti predloženih dokazov ali podanih dokaznih predlogov na podlagi odstavkov 2 in 3 predsednik drugim strankam omogoči, da glede njih predstavijo stališče.
Evidence produced or offered
Prilagoditev tožbe
Evidence produced or offered shall be submitted in the first exchange of pleadings.
Kadar se akt, katerega razglasitev ničnosti se predlaga, nadomesti ali spremeni z drugim aktom, ki ima enak predmet, lahko tožeča stranka pred koncem ustnega dela postopka ali pred odločitvijo Splošnega sodišča, da bo odločilo brez ustnega dela postopka, tožbo prilagodi, da bi upoštevala ta novi dejavnik.
In reply or rejoinder a main party may produce or offer further evidence in support of his arguments, provided that the delay in the submission of such evidence is justified.
Prilagoditev tožbe se izvede z ločenim aktom ter v roku, ki je določen v členu 263, šesti odstavek, PDEU in v katerem se lahko predlaga razglasitev ničnosti akta, ki utemeljuje prilagoditev tožbe.
The main parties may, exceptionally, produce or offer further evidence before the oral part of the procedure is closed or before the decision of the General Court to rule without an oral part of the procedure, provided that the delay in the submission of such evidence is justified.
Prilagoditvena vloga vsebuje:
Without prejudice to the decision to be taken by the General Court on the admissibility of the evidence produced or offered pursuant to paragraphs 2 and 3, the President shall give the other parties an opportunity to comment on such evidence.
prilagojene predloge;
Article 86
po potrebi prilagojene razloge in trditve;
Modification of the application
po potrebi dokaze in dokazne predloge, povezane s prilagoditvijo predlogov.
Where a measure the annulment of which is sought is replaced or amended by another measure with the same subject-matter, the applicant may, before the oral part of the procedure is closed, or before the decision of the General Court to rule without an oral part of the procedure, modify the application to take account of that new factor.
Prilagoditveni vlogi se priloži akt, ki utemeljuje prilagoditev tožbe.
The modification of the application must be made by a separate document within the time limit laid down in the sixth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU within which the annulment of the measure justifying the modification of the application may be sought.
Če tožeča stranka tega akta ne predloži, ji sodni tajnik določi razumen rok za njegovo predložitev.
The statement of modification shall contain:
Če tožeča stranka v tako določenem roku tega akta ne predloži, Splošno sodišče odloči, ali je zaradi nespoštovanja te zahteve vloga o prilagoditvi tožbe nedopustna.
the modified form of order sought;
Brez poseganja v poznejšo odločbo Splošnega sodišča glede dopustnosti vloge o prilagoditvi tožbe predsednik toženi stranki določi rok, v katerem lahko na to vlogo odgovori.
where appropriate, the modified pleas in law and arguments;
Predsednik po potrebi intervenientom določi rok, da dopolnijo intervencijske vloge glede na vlogo o prilagoditvi tožbe in odgovor nanjo.
where appropriate, the evidence produced and offered in connection with the modification of the form of order sought.
Ti vlogi se sočasno vročita intervenientom.
The statement of modification must be accompanied by the measure justifying the modification of the application.
PREDHODNO POROČILO
If that measure is not produced, the Registrar shall prescribe a reasonable time limit within which the applicant is to produce it.
Člen 87
If the applicant fails to produce the measure within the time limit prescribed, the General Court shall decide whether the non-compliance with that requirement renders the statement modifying the application inadmissible.
Predhodno poročilo
Without prejudice to the decision to be taken by the General Court on the admissibility of the statement modifying the application, the President shall prescribe a time limit within which the defendant may respond to the statement of modification.
Ko se pisni del postopka konča, določi predsednik dan, ko sodnik poročevalec Splošnemu sodišču predstavi predhodno poročilo.
The President shall, where appropriate, prescribe a time limit within which any interveners may supplement their statements in intervention in the light of the statement modifying the application and the statement in response.
Predhodno poročilo vsebuje analizo upoštevnih dejanskih in pravnih vprašanj, ki se zastavljajo s tožbo, predloge o tem, ali so v postopku potrebni ukrepi procesnega vodstva ali pripravljalni ukrepi, oziroma o tem, ali naj se izvede ustni del postopka in ali je morda treba zadevo dodeliti velikemu senatu ali senatu, ki zaseda v sestavi z drugačnim številom sodnikov, ter ali je morda zadevo treba odstopiti sodniku posamezniku.
Those statements shall be served simultaneously on the interveners for that purpose.
Splošno sodišče odloči o predlogih sodnika poročevalca in po potrebi o začetku ustnega dela postopka.
THE PRELIMINARY REPORT
UKREPI PROCESNEGA VODSTVA IN PRIPRAVLJALNI UKREPI
Article 87
Člen 88
Preliminary report
Splošna določba
When the written part of the procedure is closed, the President shall fix a date on which the Judge-Rapporteur is to present a preliminary report to the General Court.
Ukrepi procesnega vodstva in pripravljalni ukrepi se lahko sprejmejo ali spremenijo v vseh fazah postopka, po uradni dolžnosti ali na predlog glavne stranke.
The preliminary report shall contain an analysis of the relevant issues of fact and of law raised by the action, proposals as to whether measures of organisation of procedure or measures of inquiry should be undertaken, whether there should be an oral part of the procedure and whether the case should be referred to the Grand Chamber or to a Chamber sitting with a different number of Judges, and whether the case should be delegated to a single Judge.
V predlogu iz odstavka 1 je treba natančno navesti vsebino predlaganih ukrepov in razloge, ki jih utemeljujejo.
The General Court shall decide what action to take on the proposals of the Judge-Rapporteur and, where appropriate, whether to open the oral part of the procedure.
Če je ta predlog predložen po prvi izmenjavi vlog, mora stranka, ki poda predlog, navesti, zakaj ga ni mogla predložiti prej.
MEASURES OF ORGANISATION OF PROCEDURE AND MEASURES OF INQUIRY
Če se predlagajo ukrepi procesnega vodstva ali pripravljalni ukrepi, predsednik drugim strankam omogoči, da glede njih predložijo stališča.
General
Vsebina
Measures of organisation of procedure and measures of inquiry may be taken or modified at any stage of the proceedings either of the General Court's own motion or on the application of a main party.
Namen ukrepov procesnega vodstva je zagotoviti, da se zadeve pripravijo za obravnavanje ter postopki potekajo in se spori rešujejo v najboljših mogočih razmerah.
The application referred to in paragraph 1 must state precisely the purpose of the measures sought and the reasons for them.
Namen ukrepov procesnega vodstva je predvsem:
Where the application is made after the first exchange of pleadings, the party submitting that application must state the reasons for which he was unable to submit it earlier.
zagotoviti učinkovit potek pisnega ali ustnega dela postopka in olajšati izvajanje dokazov;
Where an application for measures of organisation of procedure or for measures of inquiry is made, the President shall give the other parties an opportunity to comment on that application.
določiti vprašanja, glede katerih morajo stranke dopolniti svoje trditve oziroma glede katerih so potrebni pripravljalni ukrepi;
Article 89
natančno opredeliti obseg predlogov, razlogov in trditev strank ter pojasniti točke, ki so med njimi sporne;
Purpose
olajšati mirno reševanje sporov.
The purpose of measures of organisation of procedure shall be to ensure that cases are prepared for hearing, procedures carried out and disputes resolved under the best possible conditions.
Ukrepi procesnega vodstva so med drugim:
Measures of organisation of procedure shall, in particular, have as their purpose:
postavljanje vprašanj strankam;
to ensure the efficient conduct of the written or oral part of the procedure and to facilitate the taking of evidence;
poziv strankam, naj predložijo pisna ali ustna stališča glede nekaterih vidikov spora;
to determine the points on which the parties must present further argument or which call for measures of inquiry;
poziv strankam ali tretjim iz člena 24, drugi odstavek, Statuta, naj predložijo pojasnila;
to clarify the forms of order sought by the parties, their pleas in law and arguments and the points at issue between them;
poziv strankam, naj predložijo vsa dokazila v zvezi z zadevo;
to facilitate the amicable settlement of proceedings.
vabljenje strank na sestanke.
Measures of organisation of procedure may, in particular, consist of:
Kadar se opravi glavna obravnava, Splošno sodišče, kolikor je to mogoče, stranke pozove, naj svoje navedbe osredotočijo na eno ali več določenih vprašanj.
putting questions to the parties;
Člen 90
inviting the parties to make written or oral submissions on certain aspects of the proceedings;
Postopek
asking the parties or third parties for the information referred to in the second paragraph of Article 24 of the Statute;
O ukrepih procesnega vodstva odloči Splošno sodišče.
asking the parties to produce any material relating to the case;
Če Splošno sodišče odredi ukrepe procesnega vodstva in jih ne izvede samo, naloži njihovo izvedbo sodniku poročevalcu.
summoning the parties to meetings.
Člen 91
Where a hearing is organised, the General Court shall, in so far as possible, invite the parties to concentrate in their oral pleadings on one or more specified issues.
Brez poseganja v člena 24 in 25 Statuta so pripravljalni ukrepi:
Article 90
osebna navzočnost strank;
Procedure
zahteva stranki, naj predloži pojasnila ali vsa dokazila v zvezi z zadevo;
Measures of organisation of procedure shall be prescribed by the General Court.
zahteva za predložitev dokumentov, do katerih je institucija zavrnila dostop, v okviru tožbe o zakonitosti te zavrnitve;
If the General Court decides to adopt measures of organisation of procedure and does not undertake such measures itself, it shall entrust the task of so doing to the Judge-Rapporteur.
dokazovanje z zaslišanjem prič;
Article 91
dokazovanje z izvedenci;
Without prejudice to Articles 24 and 25 of the Statute, the following measures of inquiry may be adopted:
ogled.
the personal appearance of the parties;
Člen 92
a request to a party for information or for production of any material relating to the case;
Splošno sodišče s sklepom, s katerim se opredelijo dejstva, ki jih je treba dokazati, določi potrebne ukrepe.
a request for production of documents to which access has been denied by an institution in proceedings relating to the legality of that denial;
Preden Splošno sodišče odredi pripravljalne ukrepe iz člena 91, od (d) do (f), se o njih opredelijo stranke.
oral testimony;
Pripravljalni ukrep iz člena 91(b) se lahko odredi le, če stranka, ki jo ta ukrep zadeva, ni izpolnila v ta namen predhodno sprejetega ukrepa procesnega vodstva ali če to izrecno zahteva stranka, ki jo zadeva ukrep in ki utemelji nujnost takega ukrepa v obliki sklepa o pripravljalnem ukrepu.
the commissioning of an expert's report;
V sklepu o pripravljalnem ukrepu se lahko določi, da lahko zastopniki strank v podatke in dokazila, ki jih je Splošno sodišče pridobilo na podlagi tega sklepa, vpogledajo le v sodnem tajništvu, ni pa mogoče izdajati njihovih prepisov.
an inspection of the place or thing in question.
Če Splošno sodišče odredi pripravljalne ukrepe in jih ne izvede samo, naloži njihovo izvedbo sodniku poročevalcu.
Article 92
Generalni pravobranilec sodeluje pri izvedbi pripravljalnih ukrepov.
The General Court shall prescribe the measures of inquiry that it considers appropriate by means of an order setting out the facts to be proved.
Stranke so lahko navzoče pri izvedbi pripravljalnih ukrepov.
Before the General Court decides on the measures of inquiry referred to in Article 91(d) to (f), the parties shall be heard.
Predlagajo se lahko nasprotni dokazi, dokazni predlogi pa se lahko dopolnijo.
A measure of inquiry referred to in Article 91(b) may be ordered only where the party concerned by the measure has not complied with a measure of organisation of procedure previously adopted to that end, or where expressly requested by the party concerned by the measure and that party explains the need for such a measure to be in the form of an order for a measure of inquiry.
Člen 93
The order prescribing the measure of inquiry may provide that inspection by the parties' representatives of information and material obtained by the General Court in consequence of that order may take place only at the Registry and that no copies may be made.
Vabljenje prič
If the General Court orders a preparatory inquiry and does not undertake such an inquiry itself, it shall entrust the task of so doing to the Judge-Rapporteur.
Priče, katerih zaslišanje je ocenjeno za potrebno, se vabijo s sklepom iz člena 92(1), ki vsebuje:
The Advocate General shall take part in the measures of inquiry.
imena, status in naslov prič;
The parties shall be entitled to attend the measures of inquiry.
datum in kraj zaslišanja;
Evidence may be submitted in rebuttal and previous evidence may be amplified.
navedbo dejstev, ki jih je treba ugotoviti, in prič, ki jih je treba zaslišati glede vsakega od teh dejstev.
Article 93
Priče vabi Splošno sodišče, po potrebi po položitvi zneska iz člena 100(1).
Summoning of witnesses
Člen 94
Witnesses whose examination is deemed necessary shall be summoned by an order, referred to in Article 92(1), containing the following information:
Zaslišanje prič
the name, description and address of the witness;
Po ugotovitvi istovetnosti priče jo predsednik opozori, da bo morala resničnost svojih izjav potrditi na način, ki je določen v odstavku 5 in členu 97.
the date and place of the examination;
Priča izpove Splošnemu sodišču ob navzočnosti strank.
an indication of the facts to be established and which witnesses are to be heard in respect of each of those facts.
Predsednik lahko na predlog strank ali po uradni dolžnosti priči po izpovedbi postavlja vprašanja.
Witnesses shall be summoned by the General Court, where appropriate after lodgement of the security provided for in Article 100(1).
Preostali sodniki in generalni pravobranilec imajo enako možnost.
Article 94
Zastopniki strank lahko pod nadzorom predsednika priči postavljajo vprašanja.
Examination of witnesses
Ob upoštevanju člena 97 priča po izpovedbi priseže:
After the identity of the witness has been established, the President shall inform him that he will be required to vouch the truth of his evidence in the manner laid down in paragraph 5 and in Article 97.
„Prisegam, da sem govoril(-a) resnico, vso resnico in nič drugega kot resnico.“
The witness shall give his evidence to the General Court, the parties having been given notice to attend.
Splošno sodišče lahko po opredelitvi glavnih strank pričo odveže dolžnosti prisege.
After the witness has given his evidence the President may, at the request of one of the parties or of his own motion, put questions to him.
Člen 95
The other Judges and the Advocate General may do likewise.
Obveznosti prič
Subject to the control of the President, questions may be put to witnesses by the representatives of the parties.
Priče, ki so bile pravilno povabljene, se morajo na vabilo odzvati in se udeležiti zaslišanja.
Subject to the provisions of Article 97, the witness shall, after giving his evidence, take the following oath:
Če priča, ki je bila pravilno povabljena, brez utemeljenega razloga ne pride na Splošno sodišče, ji lahko Splošno sodišče naloži plačilo denarne kazni največ 5000 EUR in odredi ponovno vabljenje na njene stroške.
‘I swear that I have spoken the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.’
Enaka denarna kazen se lahko naloži priči, ki brez utemeljenega razloga odkloni pričanje ali noče priseči.
The General Court may, after hearing the main parties, exempt a witness from taking the oath.
Člen 96
Article 95
Dokazovanje z izvedenci
Duties of witnesses
V sklepu o imenovanju izvedenca se opredeli njegova naloga in določi rok, v katerem mora predložiti poročilo.
Witnesses who have been duly summoned shall obey the summons and attend for examination.
Potem ko izvedenec predloži poročilo in se to vroči strankam, lahko Splošno sodišče odredi njegovo zaslišanje in nanj povabi stranke.
If, without good reason, a witness who has been duly summoned fails to appear before the General Court, the General Court may impose upon him a pecuniary penalty not exceeding EUR 5000 and may order that a further summons be served on the witness at his own expense.
Predsednik lahko na predlog stranke ali po uradni dolžnosti izvedencu postavlja vprašanja.
The same penalty may be imposed upon a witness who, without good reason, refuses to give evidence or to take the oath.
Zastopniki strank lahko pod nadzorom predsednika izvedencu postavljajo vprašanja.
Article 96
Ob upoštevanju člena 97 izvedenec po predložitvi poročila priseže:
Expert's report
„Prisegam, da sem vestno in nepristransko opravil(-a) svojo nalogo.“
The order appointing the expert shall define his task and set a time limit within which he is to submit his report.
Splošno sodišče lahko po opredelitvi glavnih strank izvedenca odveže dolžnosti prisege.
After the expert has submitted his report and that report has been served on the parties, the General Court may order that the expert be examined, the parties having been given notice to attend.
Člen 97
At the request of one of the parties or of his own motion, the President may put questions to the expert.
Prisega prič in izvedencev
Subject to the control of the President, questions may be put to the expert by the representatives of the parties.
Predsednik osebam, ki morajo pred Splošnim sodiščem priseči kot priče ali izvedenci, odredi, naj govorijo resnico ter svojo nalogo opravijo vestno in nepristransko, ter jih opozori še na kazenskopravne posledice, ki jih njihova nacionalna zakonodaja določa za kršitev te obveznosti.