natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Whenever the competent authorities in Member States exercise their powers pursuant to Article 28(3) of Directive 95/46/EC leading to the suspension or definitive ban of data flows to the State of Israel in order to protect individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data, the Member State concerned shall, without delay, inform the Commission which will forward the information to the other Member States.
Kadar pristojni organi v državah članicah izvajajo svoja pooblastila v skladu s členom 28(3) Direktive 95/46/ES, na podlagi česar pride do začasne ustavitve ali dokončne prepovedi prenosa podatkov v Državo Izrael, da se zaščitijo posamezniki pri obdelavi njihovih osebnih podatkov, zadevna država članica nemudoma obvesti Komisijo, ta pa informacije posreduje drugim državam članicam.
The Commission shall, on an ongoing basis, monitor developments in the Israeli legal order that could affect the functioning of this decision, including developments concerning access to personal data by public authorities, with a view to assessing whether the State of Israel continues to ensure an adequate level of protection of personal data.
Komisija stalno spremlja dogajanja na področju izraelskega pravnega reda, ki bi lahko vplivala na izvajanje tega sklepa, vključno z dogajanji glede dostopa javnih organov do osebnih podatkov, da se oceni, ali Država Izrael še naprej zagotavlja ustrezno raven varstva osebnih podatkov.
The Member States and the Commission shall inform each other of cases where the action of bodies responsible for ensuring compliance with the standard of protection in the State of Israel fails to secure such compliance.
Države članice in Komisija se medsebojno obvestijo o primerih, kadar ukrepi organov, pristojnih za zagotavljanje skladnosti s standardom varstva v Državi Izrael, ne zagotavljajo take skladnosti.
The Member States and the Commission shall inform each other of any indications that interferences by Israeli public authorities responsible for national security, law enforcement or other public interests with the right of individuals to the protection of their personal data go beyond what is strictly necessary, or that there is no effective legal protection against such interferences.
Države članice in Komisija se medsebojno obveščajo o kakršnih koli znakih, da posegi izraelskih javnih organov, pristojnih za nacionalno varnost, kazenski pregon ali druge javne interese, v pravico posameznikov do varstva osebnih podatkov presegajo tisto, kar je nujno potrebno, ali da ni učinkovitega pravnega varstva pred takimi posegi.
Where evidence shows that an adequate level of protection is no longer ensured, including in situations referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article, the Commission shall inform the competent Israeli authority and, if necessary, propose draft measures in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 31(2) of Directive 95/46/EC with a view to repealing or suspending this Decision or limiting its scope.’.
Kadar je na podlagi dokazov razvidno, da ustrezna raven varstva ni več zagotovljena, vključno s primeri iz odstavkov 2 in 3 tega člena, Komisija obvesti izraelski pristojni organ in, če je potrebno, predstavi osnutek ukrepov v skladu s postopkom iz člena 31(2) Direktive 95/46/ES z namenom razveljavitve ali zadržanja izvajanja tega sklepa oz. omejitve obsega njegove uporabe.“
Articles 2 and 3 of Implementing Decision 2012/484/EU are replaced by the following:
Člena 2 in 3 Izvedbenega sklepa 2012/484/EU se nadomestita z naslednjim:
Whenever the competent authorities in Member States exercise their powers pursuant to Article 28(3) of Directive 95/46/EC leading to the suspension or definitive ban of data flows to the Eastern Republic of Uruguay in order to protect individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data, the Member State concerned shall, without delay, inform the Commission which will forward the information to the other Member States.
Kadar pristojni organi v državah članicah izvajajo svoja pooblastila v skladu s členom 28(3) Direktive 95/46/ES, na podlagi česar pride do začasne ustavitve ali dokončne prepovedi prenosa podatkov v Vzhodno republiko Urugvaj, da se zaščitijo posamezniki pri obdelavi njihovih osebnih podatkov, zadevna država članica nemudoma obvesti Komisijo, ta pa informacije posreduje drugim državam članicam.
The Commission shall, on an ongoing basis, monitor developments in the legal order of the Eastern Republic of Uruguay that could affect the functioning of this Decision, including developments concerning access to personal data by public authorities, with a view to assessing whether the Eastern Republic of Uruguay continues to ensure an adequate level of protection of personal data.
Komisija stalno spremlja dogajanja na področju pravnega reda Vzhodne republike Urugvaj, ki bi lahko vplivala na izvajanje tega sklepa, vključno z dogajanji glede dostopa javnih organov do osebnih podatkov, da se oceni, ali Vzhodna republika Urugvaj še naprej zagotavlja ustrezno raven varstva osebnih podatkov.
The Member States and the Commission shall inform each other of cases where the action of bodies responsible for ensuring compliance with the standard of protection in the Eastern Republic of Uruguay fails to secure such compliance.
Države članice in Komisija se medsebojno obvestijo o primerih, kadar ukrepi organov, pristojnih za zagotavljanje skladnosti s standardom varstva v Vzhodni republiki Urugvaj, ne zagotavljajo take skladnosti.
The Member States and the Commission shall inform each other of any indications that interferences by Uruguayan public authorities responsible for national security, law enforcement or other public interests with the right of individuals to the protection of their personal data go beyond what is strictly necessary, or that there is no effective legal protection against such interferences.
Države članice in Komisija se medsebojno obveščajo o kakršnih koli znakih, da posegi javnih organov Vzhodne republike Urugvaj, pristojnih za nacionalno varnost, kazenski pregon ali druge javne interese, v pravico posameznikov do varstva osebnih podatkov presegajo tisto, kar je nujno potrebno, ali da ni učinkovitega pravnega varstva pred takimi posegi.
Where evidence shows that an adequate level of protection is no longer ensured, including in situations referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3, the Commission shall inform the competent Uruguayan authority and, if necessary, propose draft measures in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 31(2) of Directive 95/46/EC with a view to repealing or suspending this Decision or limiting its scope.’.
Kadar je na podlagi dokazov razvidno, da ustrezna raven varstva ni več zagotovljena, vključno s primeri iz odstavkov 2 in 3, Komisija obvesti pristojni organ Vzhodne republike Urugvaj in, če je potrebno, predstavi osnutek ukrepov v skladu s postopkom iz člena 31(2) Direktive 95/46/ES z namenom razveljavitve ali zadržanja izvajanja tega sklepa oz. omejitve obsega njegove uporabe.“
Articles 2 and 3 of Implementing Decision 2013/65/EU are replaced by the following:
Člena 2 in 3 Izvedbenega sklepa 2013/65/EU se nadomestita z naslednjim:
Whenever the competent authorities in Member States exercise their powers pursuant to Article 28(3) of Directive 95/46/EC leading to the suspension or definitive ban of data flows to New Zealand in order to protect individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data, the Member State concerned shall, without delay, inform the Commission which will forward the information to the other Member States.
Kadar pristojni organi v državah članicah izvajajo svoja pooblastila v skladu s členom 28(3) Direktive 95/46/ES, na podlagi česar pride do začasne ustavitve ali dokončne prepovedi prenosa podatkov na Novo Zelandijo, da se zaščitijo posamezniki pri obdelavi njihovih osebnih podatkov, zadevna država članica nemudoma obvesti Komisijo, ta pa informacije posreduje drugim državam članicam.
The Commission shall, on an ongoing basis, monitor developments in the New Zealand legal order that could affect the functioning of this Decision, including developments concerning access to personal data by public authorities, with a view to assessing whether New Zealand continues to ensure an adequate level of protection of personal data.
Komisija stalno spremlja dogajanja na področju pravnega reda Nove Zelandije, ki bi lahko vplivala na izvajanje tega sklepa, vključno z dogajanji glede dostopa javnih organov do osebnih podatkov, da se oceni, ali Nova Zelandija še naprej zagotavlja ustrezno raven varstva osebnih podatkov.
The Member States and the Commission shall inform each other of cases where the action of bodies responsible for ensuring compliance with the standard of protection in New Zealand fails to secure such compliance.
Države članice in Komisija se medsebojno obvestijo o primerih, kadar ukrepi organov, pristojnih za zagotavljanje skladnosti s standardom varstva na Novi Zelandiji, ne zagotavljajo take skladnosti.
The Member States and the Commission shall inform each other of any indications that interferences by New Zealand public authorities responsible for national security, law enforcement or other public interests with the right of individuals to the protection of their personal data go beyond what is strictly necessary, or that there is no effective legal protection against such interferences.
Države članice in Komisija se medsebojno obveščajo o kakršnih koli znakih, da posegi javnih organov Nove Zelandije, pristojnih za nacionalno varnost, kazenski pregon ali druge javne interese, v pravico posameznikov do varstva osebnih podatkov presegajo tisto, kar je nujno potrebno, ali da ni učinkovitega pravnega varstva pred takimi posegi.
Where evidence shows that an adequate level of protection is no longer ensured, including in situations referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article, the Commission shall inform the competent New Zealand authority and, if necessary, propose draft measures in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 31(2) of Directive 95/46/EC with a view to repealing or suspending this Decision or limiting its scope.’.
Kadar je na podlagi dokazov razvidno, da ustrezna raven varstva ni več zagotovljena, vključno s primeri iz odstavkov 2 in 3 tega člena, Komisija obvesti pristojni organ Nove Zelandije in, če je potrebno, predstavi osnutek ukrepov v skladu s postopkom iz člena 31(2) Direktive 95/46/ES z namenom razveljavitve ali zadržanja izvajanja tega sklepa oz. omejitve obsega njegove uporabe.“
Done at Brussels, 16 December 2016.
V Bruslju, 16. decembra 2016
Commission Decision 2000/520/EC of 26 July 2000 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequacy of the protection provided by the Safe Harbour Privacy Principles and related Frequently Asked Questions issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce (OJ L 215, 25.8.2000, p. 7).
Odločba Komisije 2000/520/ES z dne 26. julija 2000 po Direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES o primernosti zaščite, ki jo zagotavljajo načela zasebnosti varnega pristana in s tem povezana najpogosteje zastavljena vprašanja, ki jih je izdalo Ministrstvo za trgovino ZDA (UL L 215, 25.8.2000, str. 7).
Schrems, paragraphs 40 et seq., 101 to 103.
Sodba v zadevi Schrems, točka 40 in naslednje ter točke 101 do 103.
Schrems, paragraphs 51, 52 and 62.
Sodba v zadevi Schrems, točke 51, 52 in 62.
Schrems, paragraphs 52, 62 and 65.
Sodba v zadevi Schrems, točke 52, 62 in 65.
Commission Decision 2000/518/EC of 26 July 2000 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data provided in Switzerland (OJ L 215, 25.8.2000, p. 1).
Odločba Komisije 2000/518/ES z dne 26. julija 2000 po Direktivi 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o primernosti zaščite osebnih podatkov v Švici (UL L 215, 25.8.2000, str. 1).
Commission Decision 2002/2/EC of 20 December 2001 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data provided by the Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (OJ L 2, 4.1.2002, p. 13).
Odločba Komisije 2002/2/ES z dne 20. decembra 2001 na podlagi Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki ga zagotavlja kanadski Zakon o varstvu osebnih podatkov in elektronskih dokumentih (UL L 2, 4.1.2002, str. 13).
Commission Decision 2003/490/EC of 30 June 2003 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data in Argentina (OJ L 168, 5.7.2003, p. 19).
Odločba Komisije 2003/490/ES z dne 30. junija 2003 v skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov v Argentini (UL L 168, 5.7.2003, str. 19).
Commission Decision 2003/821/EC of 21 November 2003 on the adequate protection of personal data in Guernsey (OJ L 308, 25.11.2003, p. 27).
Odločba Komisije 2003/821/ES z dne 21. novembra 2003 o primernem varstvu osebnih podatkov na Guernseyju (UL L 308, 25.11.2003, str. 27).
Commission Decision 2004/411/EC of 28 April 2004 on the adequate protection of personal data in the Isle of Man (OJ L 151, 30.4.2004, p. 48).
Odločba Komisije 2004/411/ES z dne 28. aprila 2004 o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov na otoku Man (UL L 151, 30.4.2004, str. 48).
Commission Decision 2008/393/EC of 8 May 2008 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data in Jersey (OJ L 138, 28.5.2008, p. 21).
Odločba Komisije 2008/393/ES z dne 8. maja 2008 v skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov na otoku Jersey (UL L 138, 28.5.2008, str. 21).
Commission Decision 2010/146/EU of 5 March 2010 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection provided by the Faeroese Act on processing of personal data (OJ L 58, 9.3.2010, p. 17).
Sklep Komisije 2010/146/EU z dne 5. marca 2010 v skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki ga zagotavlja ferski zakon o obdelavi osebnih podatkov (UL L 58, 9.3.2010, str. 17).
Commission Decision 2010/625/EU of 19 October 2010 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data in Andorra (OJ L 277, 21.10.2010, p. 27).
Sklep Komisije 2010/625/EU z dne 19. oktobra 2010 v skladu z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov v Andori (UL L 277, 21.10.2010, str. 27).
Commission Decision 2011/61/EU of 31 January 2011 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by the State of Israel with regard to automated processing of personal data (OJ L 27, 1.2.2011, p. 39).
Sklep Komisije 2011/61/EU z dne 31. januarja 2011 o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki ga zagotavlja Država Izrael pri avtomatizirani obdelavi osebnih podatkov, v skladu z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES (UL L 27, 1.2.2011, str. 39).
Commission Implementing Decision 2012/484/EU of 21 August 2012 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by the Eastern Republic of Uruguay with regard to automated processing of personal data (OJ L 227, 23.8.2012, p. 11).
Izvedbeni sklep 2012/484/EU Komisije z dne 21. avgusta 2012 o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki ga zagotavlja Vzhodna republika Urugvaj pri avtomatizirani obdelavi osebnih podatkov, v skladu z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES (UL L 227, 23.8.2012, str. 11).
Commission Implementing Decision 2013/65/EU of 19 December 2012 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by New Zealand (OJ L 28, 30.1.2013, p. 12).
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2013/65/EU z dne 19. decembra 2012 v skladu z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki ga zagotavlja Nova Zelandija (UL L 28, 30.1.2013, str. 12).
Schrems, paragraph 76.
Sodba v zadevi Schrems, točka 76.
Such a check is required, in any event, when the Commission acquires any information giving rise to a justified doubt in that regard.
Tako preverjanje se v vsakem primeru zahteva, kadar Komisija pridobi kakršne koli informacije, ki zbujajo upravičen dvom v zvezi s tem.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2296
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/2296
setting up the independent group of experts designated as Performance Review Body of the single European sky
o ustanovitvi neodvisne skupine strokovnjakov, imenovane za organ za oceno uspešnosti enotnega evropskega neba
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the single European sky (the framework Regulation) [1], and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 549/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 10. marca 2004 o določitvi okvira za oblikovanje enotnega evropskega neba (Okvirna uredba) [1] in zlasti člena 11(2) Uredbe,
The work of the Performance Review Body of the single European sky makes a positive contribution towards improving the European air traffic management (ATM) network, in particular by providing the Commission with impartial, evidence-based recommendations on the performance of air navigation services at Union and local levels as well as of network functions.
Delo organa za oceno uspešnosti enotnega evropskega neba pozitivno prispeva k izboljšanju evropske mreže za upravljanje zračnega prometa, zlasti tako, da Komisiji zagotavlja nepristranska, na dokazih osnovana priporočila glede uspešnosti navigacijskih služb zračnega prometa na ravni Unije in lokalni ravni ter glede uspešnosti funkcij omrežja.
The assistance provided by the Performance Review Body is indispensable to help attain the objectives of completing the single European sky, for which the performance scheme, established in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 [2], including further necessary developments in the light of experiences made during its application so far, and the closely linked charging scheme, established in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 391/2013 [3], are key drivers, and of the Commission's Aviation Strategy more generally [4].
Pomoč, ki jo zagotavlja organ za oceno uspešnosti, je nepogrešljiva pri doseganju ciljev dokončanja enotnega evropskega neba, pri čemer sta ključna dejavnika načrt izvedbe, določen v skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 390/2013 [2], vključno z nadaljnjim razvojem, potrebnim na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih med njegovo dosedanjo uporabo, in tesno povezani sistem pristojbin, uveden v skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 391/2013 [3], ki sta hkrati tudi dejavnika širše letalske strategije Komisije [4].
The designation of the present Performance Review Body will end on 31 December 2016, pursuant to Commission Implementing Decision 2014/672/EU [5].
Imenovanje obstoječega organa za oceno uspešnosti v skladu z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2014/672/EU [5] poteče 31. decembra 2016.
The Commission should designate a new Performance Review Body to continue assisting the Commission and the national supervisory authorities after that date.
Komisija bi morala imenovati nov organ za oceno uspešnosti, ki bo Komisiji in nacionalnim nadzornim organom pomagal tudi po tem datumu.
That designation should be for the period starting on 1 January 2017 and ending on 31 December 2024, so as to provide for a sufficiently long period, thus assuring continuity and stability, while also providing for a fixed term which is consistent with the reference periods, as required by Article 3(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013.
Imenovanje bi moralo veljati za obdobje od 1. januarja 2017 do vključno 31. decembra 2024, da se zagotovi dovolj dolgo obdobje ter tako zajamči stalnost in stabilnost, hkrati pa se opredeli določeno obdobje, kar je v skladu z referenčnimi obdobji, kot zahteva člen 3(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 390/2013.
Considering that that period extends from the second to the third reference period, any renewal of membership of the Performance Review Body should be such as to ensure a smooth transition and continuity of the experience and knowledge available.
Ob upoštevanju, da navedeno obdobje sega iz drugega v tretje referenčno obdobje, bi se moralo vsako podaljšanje članstva v organu za oceno uspešnosti izvesti na način, ki zagotavlja nemoten prehod ter stalnost razpoložljivih izkušenj in znanja.
With a view to strengthening the impartiality of the Performance Review Body an independent group of experts should be set up to assist in the implementation of the performance scheme and that group of experts should be designated as the Performance Review Body.
Da bi okrepili nepristranskost organa za oceno uspešnosti, bi bilo treba ustanoviti neodvisno skupino strokovnjakov, ki bi nudila pomoč pri izvajanju načrta izvedbe, in ta skupina strokovnjakov bi se morala imenovati organ za oceno uspešnosti.
Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 specifies in a general manner what the role of the Performance Review Body is in the context of the performance scheme.
Člen 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 549/2004 na splošno določa vlogo organa za oceno uspešnosti v kontekstu načrta izvedbe.
Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 provides further details as regards its tasks and activities, in a non-exhaustive manner.
Člen 3 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 390/2013 določa dodatne neizčrpne podrobnosti glede njegovih nalog in dejavnosti.
Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) No 598/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] also attributes certain tasks.
Nekatere naloge določa tudi člen 6(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 598/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6].
For the sake of clarity and completeness, in accordance with those provisions, all tasks of the Performance Review Body should now be listed.
Zaradi jasnosti in popolnosti bi bilo treba v skladu z navedenimi določbami zdaj našteti vse naloge organa za oceno uspešnosti.
The Performance Review Body should assist the Commission by providing advice, expertise and other services.
Organ za oceno uspešnosti bi moral pomagati Komisiji z zagotavljanjem svetovanja, strokovnega znanja in drugih storitev.
For this purpose, it should coordinate with the national supervisory authorities.
V ta namen bi se moral usklajevati z nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi.
It should also assist the national supervisory authorities on their request.
Pomagati bi moral tudi nacionalnim nadzornim organom, če to zahtevajo.
With a view to ensuring the efficient and effective functioning of the Performance Review Body, it should be supported by a Secretariat provided by the Commission.
Da bi zagotovili smotrno in učinkovito delovanje organa za oceno uspešnosti, bi ga moral podpirati sekretariat, ki ga zagotovi Komisija.
The members of the Performance Review Body should be highly qualified specialists, with appropriate competence in the key performance areas.
Člani organa za oceno uspešnosti bi morali biti visokokvalificirani strokovnjaki z ustrezno usposobljenostjo na ključnih področjih uspešnosti.
The members, other than the chair, should be selected through a call for applications and a selection procedure, respecting the principles of objectivity, equal opportunities and transparency and providing for the detection of actual or potential conflicts of interests, and they should be appointed in their personal capacity.
Člani, razen predsednika, bi morali biti izbrani prek povabila k oddaji prijave in izbirnega postopka, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati načela objektivnosti, enakih možnosti in preglednosti ter zagotoviti odkrivanje dejanskih ali potencialnih nasprotij interesov.
Considering his or her particular tasks and responsibilities, the chair should be appointed by the Commission in accordance with its internal administrative arrangements, while respecting those principles and providing for such detection.
Imenovani bi morali biti osebno.