natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, if you book additional travel services via this link/these links not later than 24 hours after receiving the confirmation of the booking from our company/XY, those travel services will become part of a linked travel arrangement.
Del E
Part E
Obrazec standardnih informacij, kadar je trgovec, ki prek spleta omogoča povezane potovalne aranžmaje v smislu točke (b) točke 5 člena 3, trgovec, ki ni prevoznik, ki prodaja povratno vozovnico
Standard information form where the trader facilitating an online linked travel arrangement within the meaning of point (b) of point 5 of Article 3 is a trader other than a carrier selling a return ticket
PRILOGA III
ANNEX III
Korelacijska tabela
Correlation table
Direktiva 90/314/EGS
Directive 90/314/EEC
Ta direktiva
This Directive
Člen 2(1)
Article 2(1)
Točka 2 člena 3 in točka (a) člena 2(2)
Point 2 of Article 3 and Article 2(2), point (a)
Člen 2(2)
Article 2(2)
Točka 8 člena 3
Point 8 of Article 3
Člen 2(3)
Article 2(3)
Točka 9 člena 3
Point 9 of Article 3
Člen 2(4)
Article 2(4)
Točka 6 člena 3
Point 6 of Article 3
Člen 2(5)
Article 2(5)
Točka 3 člena 3
Point 3 of Article 3
Člen 3(1)
Article 3(1)
Črtan
Deleted
Člen 3(2)
Article 3(2)
Črtan, vendar so glavni deli vključeni v člena 5 in 6
Deleted; however main parts incorporated in Articles 5 and 6
Točka (a) člena 4(1)
Article 4(1), point (a)
Točka (f) člena 5(1)
Article 5(1), point (f)
Točka (b) člena 4(1)
Article 4(1), point (b)
Točka (h) člena 5(1), točki (d) in (f) člena 7(2) in člen 7(4)
Article 5(1), point (h), Article 7(2), points (d) and (f), and Article 7(4)
Točka (a) člena 4(2)
Article 4(2), point (a)
Člen 7(2)
Article 7(2)
Točka (b) člena 4(2)
Article 4(2), point (b)
Člen 5(3) ter člen 7(1) in (4)
Article 5(3), and Article 7(1) and (4)
Točka (c) člena 4(2)
Article 4(2), point (c)
Člen 4(3)
Article 4(3)
Člen 4(4)
Article 4(4)
Člen 4(5)
Article 4(5)
Člen 11(2) in (3)
Article 11(2) and (3)
Člen 4(6)
Article 4(6)
Člen 11(2), (3) in (4) ter člen 12(3) in (4)
Article 11(2), (3) and (4), and Article 12(3) and (4)
Člen 4(7)
Article 4(7)
Člen 13(5), (6) in (7)
Article 13(5), (6) and (7)
Člen 5(1)
Article 5(1)
Člen 13(1)
Article 13(1)
Člen 5(2)
Article 5(2)
Člen 14(2), (3) in (4) ter člen 16
Article 14(2) (3) and (4), and Article 16
Člen 5(3)
Article 5(3)
Člen 23(3)
Article 23(3)
Člen 5(4)
Article 5(4)
Točka (e) člena 7(2) in člen 13(2)
Article 7(2), point (e), and Article 13(2)
Člen 13(3)
Article 13(3)
Člen 17 in člen 18
Article 17 and Article 18
Člen 9(1)
Article 9(1)
Člen 28(1)
Article 28(1)
Člen 9(2)
Article 9(2)
Člen 28(4)
Article 28(4)
Točka (a) Priloge
Annex, point (a)
Točka (a)(i) člena 5(1)
Article 5(1), point (a)(i)
Točka (b) Priloge
Annex, point (b)
Točka (a)(ii) člena 5(1)
Article 5(1), point (a)(ii)
Točka (c) Priloge
Annex, point (c)
Točka (a)(iii) člena 5(1)
Article 5(1), point (a)(iii)
Točka (d) Priloge
Annex, point (d)
Točka (e) člena 5(1)
Article 5(1), point (e)
Točka (e) Priloge
Annex, point (e)
Točka (f) Priloge
Annex, point (f)
Točka (a)(v) člena 5(1)
Article 5(1), point (a)(v)
Točka (g) Priloge
Annex, point (g)
Točka (b) člena 5(1)
Article 5(1), point (b)
Točka (h) Priloge
Annex, point (h)
Točka (c) člena 5(1) in člen 10(1)
Article 5(1), point (c), and Article 10(1)
Točka (i) Priloge
Annex, point (i)
Točka (d) člena 5(1)
Article 5(1), point (d)
Točka (j) Priloge
Annex, point (j)
Točka (a) člena 7(2)
Article 7(2), point (a)
Točka (k) Priloge
Annex, point (k)
Člen 13(2)
Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva (EU) 2015/2366 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC
o plačilnih storitvah na notranjem trgu, spremembah direktiv 2002/65/ES, 2009/110/ES ter 2013/36/EU in Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 ter razveljavitvi Direktive 2007/64/ES
In recent years, significant progress has been achieved in integrating retail payments in the Union, in particular in the context of the Union acts on payments, in particular through Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [4], Regulation (EC) No 924/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5], Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], and Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].
V zadnjih letih je bil v Uniji dosežen precejšen napredek pri integraciji trga plačil malih vrednosti, zlasti v okviru aktov Unije o plačilih, zlasti z Direktivo 2007/64/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4], Uredbo (ES) št. 924/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5], Direktivo 2009/110/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6] in Uredbo (EU) št. 260/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7].
Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [8] has further complemented the legal framework for payment services by setting a specific limit on the ability of retailers to surcharge their customers for the use of a given means of payment.
Z Direktivo 2011/83/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8] je bil pravni okvir za plačilne storitve še dodatno dopolnjen, saj prodajalcem na drobno izrecno in natančno omejuje možnost zaračunavanja doplačil njihovim strankam za uporabo danih plačilnih sredstev.
The revised Union legal framework on payment services is complemented by Regulation (EU) 2015/751 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9].
Revidirani pravni okvir Unije za plačilne storitve je dopolnjen z Uredbo (EU) 2015/751 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9].
That Regulation introduces, in particular, rules on the charging of interchange fees for card-based transactions and aims to further accelerate the achievement of an effective integrated market for card-based payments.
V navedeni uredbi so določena zlasti pravila o zaračunavanju medbančnih provizij za kartične transakcije in njen namen je še pospešiti vzpostavljanje učinkovitega integriranega trga za kartična plačila.
Since then, the retail payments market has experienced significant technical innovation, with rapid growth in the number of electronic and mobile payments and the emergence of new types of payment services in the market place, which challenges the current framework.
Pomembna področja trga plačil, zlasti kartičnih, spletnih in mobilnih plačil, so zaradi državnih meja še vedno razdrobljena.
The review of the Union legal framework on payment services and, in particular, the analysis of the impact of Directive 2007/64/EC and the consultation on the Commission Green Paper of 11 January 2012, entitled, ‘Towards an integrated European market for card, internet and mobile payments’, have shown that developments have given rise to significant challenges from a regulatory perspective.
Mnogi inovativni plačilni produkti ali storitve v veliki meri ali v celoti niso zajeti v področje uporabe Direktive 2007/64/ES.
Significant areas of the payments market, in particular card, internet and mobile payments, remain fragmented along national borders.
Poleg tega se je področje uporabe Direktive 2007/64/ES in zlasti elementov izvzetih iz njenega področja uporabe, kot so nekatere s plačili povezane dejavnosti, v nekaterih primerih izkazalo za preveč dvoumno, presplošno ali preprosto zastarelo glede na razvoj trga.
Many innovative payment products or services do not fall, entirely or in large part, within the scope of Directive 2007/64/EC.
To povzroča pravno negotovost, morebitna varnostna tveganja v plačilni verigi in pomanjkljivo varstvo potrošnikov na nekaterih področjih.
Furthermore, the scope of Directive 2007/64/EC and, in particular, the elements excluded from its scope, such as certain payment-related activities, has proved in some cases to be too ambiguous, too general or simply outdated, taking into account market developments.
Ponudniki plačilnih storitev so s težavo uveljavljali inovativne in varne digitalne plačilne storitve, ki so preproste za uporabo, ter potrošnikom in prodajalcem na drobno zagotovili učinkovite, priročne in varne načine plačevanja v Uniji.
This has resulted in legal uncertainty, potential security risks in the payment chain and a lack of consumer protection in certain areas.
Na tem področju je veliko pozitivnega potenciala, ki ga je treba temeljiteje preučiti.
It has proven difficult for payment service providers to launch innovative, safe and easy-to-use digital payment services and to provide consumers and retailers with effective, convenient and secure payment methods in the Union.
Stalni razvoj integriranega notranjega trga za varna elektronska plačila je ključnega pomena, da se podpre rast gospodarstva Unije ter da se potrošnikom, trgovcem in podjetjem omogoči izbira in zagotovi preglednost plačilnih storitev, da bodo lahko v celoti izkoristili vse prednosti notranjega trga.
In that context, there is a large positive potential which needs to be more consistently explored.
Treba bi bilo vzpostaviti nova pravila za zapolnitev regulativnih vrzeli, ob hkratnem zagotavljanju večje pravne jasnosti in dosledne uporabe zakonodajnega okvira po vsej Uniji.
The continued development of an integrated internal market for safe electronic payments is crucial in order to support the growth of the Union economy and to ensure that consumers, merchants and companies enjoy choice and transparency of payment services to benefit fully from the internal market.
Obstoječim in novim udeležencem na trgu bi bilo treba zagotoviti enakovredne pogoje poslovanja, s katerimi bi omogočili, da novi načini plačevanja dosežejo širši trg, ter zagotovili visoko raven varstva potrošnikov pri uporabi teh plačilnih storitev po vsej Uniji.
New rules should be established to close the regulatory gaps while at the same time providing more legal clarity and ensuring consistent application of the legislative framework across the Union.
To bi moralo zagotoviti učinkovitost v celotnem plačilnem sistemu ter omogočiti večjo izbiro in preglednost plačilnih storitev, obenem pa okrepiti zaupanje potrošnikov v harmonizirani trg plačil.
Equivalent operating conditions should be guaranteed, to existing and new players on the market, enabling new means of payment to reach a broader market, and ensuring a high level of consumer protection in the use of those payment services across the Union as a whole.
V zadnjih letih so se povečala varnostna tveganja pri elektronskih plačilih.
This should generate efficiencies in the payment system as a whole and lead to more choice and more transparency of payment services while strengthening the trust of consumers in a harmonised payments market.
To je posledica naraščajoče tehnične zapletenosti elektronskih plačil, njihovega čedalje večjega obsega na svetovni ravni in pojava novih vrst plačilnih storitev.
In recent years, the security risks relating to electronic payments have increased.
Varne plačilne storitve so bistven pogoj za dobro delujoč trg plačilnih storitev.
This is due to the growing technical complexity of electronic payments, the continuously growing volumes of electronic payments worldwide and emerging types of payment services.
Zato bi morali biti uporabniki plačilnih storitev ustrezno zaščiteni pred takšnimi tveganji.
Safe and secure payment services constitute a vital condition for a well-functioning payment services market.
Plačilne storitve so bistvenega pomena za delovanje temeljnih gospodarskih in družbenih dejavnosti.
Users of payment services should therefore be adequately protected against such risks.
Da bi se izognili različnim pristopom v državah članicah v škodo potrošnikov, bi se morale, če je to primerno, določbe te direktive o preglednosti in o zahtevah glede informacij za ponudnike plačilnih storitev ter tiste o pravicah in obveznostih v zvezi z opravljanjem in uporabo plačilnih storitev uporabljati tudi za transakcije, pri katerih se eden od ponudnikov plačilnih storitev nahaja zunaj Evropskega gospodarskega prostora (EGP).
Payment services are essential for the functioning of vital economic and social activities.
Kjer je primerno, bi morali navedene določbe razširiti na transakcije v vseh uradnih valutah med ponudniki plačilnih storitev, ki se nahajajo v EGP.
The provisions of this Directive on transparency and information requirements for payment service providers and on rights and obligations in relation to the provision and use of payment services should also apply, where appropriate, to transactions where one of the payment service providers is located outside the European Economic Area (EEA) in order to avoid divergent approaches across Member States to the detriment of consumers.
Denarno nakazilo je enostavna plačilna storitev, običajno na podlagi denarnih sredstev, ki jih plačnik zagotovi ponudniku plačilnih storitev, ki na primer prek komunikacijskega omrežja nakaže ustrezen znesek prejemniku plačila ali drugemu ponudniku plačilnih storitev, ki deluje v imenu prejemnika plačila.
Where appropriate, those provisions should be extended to transactions in all official currencies between payment service providers that are located within the EEA.
V nekaterih državah članicah samopostrežne trgovine, trgovci in drugi prodajalci na drobno javnosti zagotavljajo ustrezno storitev, ki omogoča plačilo javnih storitev in drugih rednih gospodinjskih računov.
Money remittance is a simple payment service that is usually based on cash provided by a payer to a payment service provider, which remits the corresponding amount, for example via a communication network, to a payee or to another payment service provider acting on behalf of the payee.
Te storitve plačevanja računov bi morale biti obravnavane kot denarno nakazilo, razen če pristojni organi menijo, da ta dejavnost sodi pod drugo plačilno storitev.
In some Member States, supermarkets, merchants and other retailers provide to the public a corresponding service enabling them to pay utilities and other regular household bills.
Ta direktiva uvaja nevtralno opredelitev pridobivanja plačilnih transakcij, ki naj bi poleg tradicionalnih modelov pridobivanja na podlagi uporabe plačilnih kartic zajela tudi drugačne poslovne modele, med drugim tiste, ki vključujejo več pridobiteljev.
Those bill-paying services should be treated as money remittance, unless the competent authorities consider the activity to fall under another payment service.
Tako naj bi zagotovili, da bi trgovci uživali enako zaščito ne glede na plačilni instrument, pri katerem gre za enako dejavnost, kot je pridobivanje transakcij s plačilnimi karticami.
This Directive introduces a neutral definition of acquiring of payment transactions in order to capture not only the traditional acquiring models structured around the use of payment cards, but also different business models, including those where more than one acquirer is involved.
Tehnične storitve, ki se zagotavljajo ponudnikom plačilnih storitev, kot so zgolj obdelava in hramba podatkov ali obratovanje terminalov, ne bi smele veljati za pridobivanje.
This should ensure that merchants receive the same protection, regardless of the payment instrument used, where the activity is the same as the acquiring of card transactions.
Poleg tega nekateri modeli pridobivanja ne predvidevajo dejanskega prenosa sredstev od pridobitelja na prejemnika plačila, saj se lahko stranke dogovorijo o drugih oblikah poravnave.
Technical services provided to payment service providers, such as the mere processing and storage of data or the operation of terminals, should not be considered to constitute acquiring.
Izvzetje plačilnih transakcij s posredovanjem zastopnika v imenu plačnika ali prejemnika plačila iz področja uporabe Direktive 2007/64/ES se v državah članicah uporablja zelo različno.
Moreover, some acquiring models do not provide for an actual transfer of funds by the acquirer to the payee because the parties may agree upon other forms of settlement.
Nekatere države članice dovoljujejo uporabo izvzetja platformam za e-trgovanje, ki delujejo kot posredniki v imenu posameznih kupcev in prodajalcev brez dejanskega manevrskega prostora za pogajanja oziroma sklenitev dogovora o nakupu ali prodaji blaga ali storitev.
The exclusion from the scope of Directive 2007/64/EC of payment transactions through a commercial agent on behalf of the payer or the payee is applied very differently across the Member States.
Takšna uporaba izvzetja presega predvideno področje uporabe iz navedene direktive in lahko poveča tveganja za potrošnike, saj ti ponudniki ostajajo zunaj zaščite pravnega okvira.
Certain Member States allow the use of the exclusion by e-commerce platforms that act as an intermediary on behalf of both individual buyers and sellers without a real margin to negotiate or conclude the sale or purchase of goods or services.
Različni načini uporabe poleg tega izkrivljajo konkurenco na trgu plačil.
Such application of the exclusion goes beyond the intended scope set out in that Directive and has the potential to increase risks for consumers, as those providers remain outside the protection of the legal framework.
Zaradi takšnih pomislekov bi se moralo izvzetje uporabljati za zastopnike, ki delujejo le v imenu plačnika ali le v imenu prejemnika plačila, ne glede na to, ali imajo v lasti sredstva strank.
Differing application practices also distort competition in the payment market.
Kadar zastopniki delujejo tako v imenu plačnika kot prejemnika plačila (na primer nekatere platforme za e-trgovanje), bi morali biti izvzeti le, če v nobenem trenutku nimajo v lasti sredstev strank ali nadzora nad njimi.
To address those concerns, the exclusion should therefore apply when agents act only on behalf of the payer or only on behalf of the payee, regardless of whether or not they are in possession of client funds.
Ta direktiva se ne bi smela uporabljati za dejavnosti podjetij za prevoz gotovine in podjetij za upravljanje denarnih sredstev, katerih zadevne dejavnosti so omejene na fizični prevoz bankovcev in kovancev.
Where agents act on behalf of both the payer and the payee (such as certain e-commerce platform), they should be excluded only if they do not, at any time enter into possession or control of client funds.
Iz povratnih informacij s trga je razvidno, da plačilne dejavnosti, za katere velja izvzetje omejenih mrež, pogosto zajemajo znatne količine in zneske plačil ter nudijo potrošnikom na stotine ali tisoče različnih proizvodov in storitev.
This Directive should not apply to the activities of cash-in-transit companies (CITs) and cash management companies (CMCs) where the activities concerned are limited to the physical transport of banknotes and coins.
To ni skladno z namenom izvzetja omejenih mrež, kot je določeno v Direktivi 2007/64/ES, in pomeni večja tveganja ter ne predstavlja pravne varnosti za uporabnike plačilnih storitev, zlasti za potrošnike, ter očitno slabši položaj za regulirane udeležence na trgu.
Feedback from the market shows that the payment activities covered by the limited network exclusion often comprise significant payment volumes and values and offer to consumers hundreds or thousands of different products and services.
Da bi omejili ta tveganja, istega instrumenta ne bi smelo biti mogoče uporabiti v plačilnih transakcijah za nakup blaga in storitev v več kot eni omejeni mreži ali nakup neomejenega izbora blaga in storitev.
That does not fit the purpose of the limited network exclusion as provided for in Directive 2007/64/EC and implies greater risks and no legal protection for payment service users, in particular consumers, and clear disadvantages for regulated market actors.
Veljati bi moralo, da se plačilni instrument uporablja v okviru take omejene mreže, če ga je mogoče uporabljati le v naslednjih okoliščinah: prvič: za nakup blaga in storitev pri določenem trgovcu na drobno ali v določeni maloprodajni verigi trgovin; kadar so sodelujoči subjekti neposredno povezani s poslovno pogodbo, ki na primer omogoča uporabo enotne plačilne blagovne znamke, navedena plačilna blagovna znamka pa se uporablja na prodajnih mestih in je – po možnosti – prikazana na plačilnem instrumentu, ki se lahko uporablja na teh mestih; drugič za nakup zelo omejenega izbora blaga ali storitev, ko je na primer obseg uporabe dejansko omejen na zaključeno število funkcionalno povezanega blaga ali storitev, ne glede na geografsko lokacijo prodajnega mesta; ali tretjič, kadar plačilni instrument ureja nacionalni ali regionalni javni organ za posebne socialne ali davčne namene za nakup posebnega blaga ali storitev.
To help limit those risks, it should not be possible to use the same instrument to make payment transactions to acquire goods and services within more than one limited network or to acquire an unlimited range of goods and services.
Plačilni instrumenti, za katere velja izvzetje omejenih mrež, lahko vključujejo kartice trgovin, kartice za nakup goriva, članske kartice, kartice za javni prevoz, parkirne kartice, bone za prehrano ali bone za različne storitve, za katere včasih velja poseben davek ali pravni okvir na področju dela, ki je namenjen spodbujanju uporabe takšnih instrumentov zaradi uresničevanja ciljev, določenih v socialni zakonodaji.
A payment instrument should be considered to be used within such a limited network if it can be used only in the following circumstances: first, for the purchase of goods and services in a specific retailer or specific retail chain, where the entities involved are directly linked by a commercial agreement which for example provides for the use of a single payment brand and that payment brand is used at the points of sale and appears, where feasible, on the payment instrument that can be used there; second, for the purchase of a very limited range of goods or services, such as where the scope of use is effectively limited to a closed number of functionally connected goods or services regardless of the geographical location of the point of sale; or third, where the payment instrument is regulated by a national or regional public authority for specific social or tax purposes to acquire specific goods or services.
Kadar se tak instrument za posebne namene razvije v instrument za splošne namene, se izvzetje iz področja uporabe te direktive ne bi smelo več uporabljati.
Payment instruments covered by the limited network exclusion could include store cards, fuel cards, membership cards, public transport cards, parking ticketing, meal vouchers or vouchers for specific services, which are sometimes subject to a specific tax or labour legal framework designed to promote the use of such instruments to meet the objectives laid down in social legislation.
Instrumenti, ki jih je mogoče uporabljati za nakupe v trgovinah trgovcev s seznama, ne bi smeli biti izvzeti iz področja uporabe te direktive, ker so praviloma zasnovani za mrežo ponudnikov storitev, ki se nenehno širi.
Where such a specific-purpose instrument develops into a general-purpose instrument, the exclusion from the scope of this Directive should no longer apply.
Izvzetje omejenih mrež bi se moralo uporabljati skupaj z obveznostjo potencialnih ponudnikov plačilnih storitev, da priglasijo dejavnosti, ki sodijo v obseg opredelitve.
Instruments which can be used for purchases in stores of listed merchants should not be excluded from the scope of this Directive as such instruments are typically designed for a network of service providers which is continuously growing.
Iz področja uporabe Direktive 2007/64/ES so izvzete nekatere plačilne transakcije prek telekomunikacijskih naprav ali naprav informacijske tehnologije, pri katerih operater omrežja ni le posrednik za dobavo digitalnega blaga in storitev prek zadevne naprave, ampak jim tudi dodaja vrednost.
The limited network exclusion should apply in combination with the obligation of potential payment service providers to notify activities falling within its scope.
To izvzetje zlasti omogoča tako imenovano plačevanje prek operaterja ali neposredne nakupe prek mobilnega naročniškega razmerja, ki začenši z melodijami zvonjenja in premijskimi storitvami SMS prispeva k razvoju novih poslovnih modelov na podlagi prodaje digitalnih vsebin majhne vrednosti in glasovnih storitev.