natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the 11th EDF for the financial year 2014.
Komisija je dejavnosti enajstega ERS v proračunskem letu 2014 na splošno zadovoljivo izvajala –
Done at Brussels, 12 February 2016.
PRIPOROČA, da Evropski parlament podeli Komisiji razrešnico za izvajanje dejavnosti enajstega ERS za proračunsko leto 2014.
OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3.
Predsednik
OJ L 210, 6.8.2013, p. 1.
UL L 317, 15.12.2000, str.
OJ L 58, 3.3.2015, p.
3
17.
UL L 210, 6.8.2013, str.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2016/336
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2016/336
on the application of Council Directive 2008/120/EC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs as regards measures to reduce the need for tail-docking
o uporabi Direktive Sveta 2008/120/ES o določitvi minimalnih pogojev za zaščito prašičev v zvezi z ukrepi za zmanjšanje potrebe po krajšanju repov
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 292 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, in zlasti člena 292 Pogodbe,
Council Directive 2008/120/EC [1] requires Member States to ensure that tail-docking is not carried out routinely but only where there is evidence that injuries to sows' teats or to other pigs' ears or tails have occurred.
Direktiva Sveta 2008/120/ES [1] od držav članic zahteva, da zagotovijo, da se krajšanje repov ne opravlja rutinsko, temveč samo takrat, kadar se lahko dokaže, da so na seskih svinj ali na uhljih ali repih drugih prašičev nastale poškodbe.
The practice of tail-docking of pigs is carried out to prevent tail-biting, an aberrant behaviour which has a multi-factorial origin.
Krajšanje repov se pri prašičih opravlja za preprečevanje grizenja repov, neobičajnega vedenja, ki ga povzroča več dejavnikov.
That practice is likely to cause pain to pigs and is therefore detrimental to their welfare.
Navedena praksa prašičem najverjetneje povzroča bolečine in zato zmanjšuje njihovo dobrobit.
Directive 2008/120/EC provides that before carrying out tail-docking other measures are to be taken to prevent tail-biting and other vices, taking into account environment and stocking densities.
Direktiva 2008/120/ES določa, da je treba pred krajšanjem repov sprejeti druge ukrepe za preprečevanje grizenja repov in drugih vedenjskih motenj, pri čemer se upoštevata okolje in gostota živali.
For that reason, inadequate environmental conditions or management systems are to be changed.
Zaradi tega je treba spremeniti neprimerne bivalne razmere nastanitve ali sisteme reje.
Directive 2008/120/EC also requires Member States to ensure that pigs have permanent access to a sufficient quantity of material to enable proper investigation and manipulation activities, such as straw, hay, wood, sawdust, mushroom compost, peat or a mixture of such (‘enrichment material’), which does not compromise the health of those animals.
Direktiva 2008/120/ES od držav članic prav tako zahteva, da zagotovijo, da imajo prašiči stalen dostop do zadostne količine materiala, kot je na primer slama, seno, les, stržine, gobji kompost, šota ali mešanica takšnega materiala („material za obogatitev okolja“), ki ga lahko brez težav raziskujejo in premikajo, ne da bi bilo pri tem ogroženo njihovo zdravje.
The European Food Safety Authority has provided scientific opinions on the risks associated with the tail-biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail-docking [2] and also a scientific opinion concerning a multifactorial approach on the use of animal and non-animal based measures to assess the welfare of pigs [3].
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane je pripravila znanstvena mnenja o tveganjih, povezanih z grizenjem repov pri prašičih, in mogočih načinih za zmanjšanje potrebe po krajšanju repov [2] ter tudi znanstveno mnenje o večfaktorskem pristopu k uporabi z živalmi povezanih in nepovezanih ukrepov za oceno dobrobiti prašičev [3].
The findings of those scientific opinions should be taken into account in the best practices referred to in this Recommendation.
Ugotovitve navedenih znanstvenih mnenj bi bilo treba upoštevati pri najboljših praksah iz tega priporočila.
Husbandry systems differ across the Member States.
Sistemi reje se med državami članicami razlikujejo.
It is therefore necessary to recommend at Union level best practices aimed at reducing the need for tail-docking and optimised solutions for providing enrichment materials.
Zato je treba na ravni Unije priporočiti najboljše prakse za zmanjšanje potrebe po krajšanju repov in optimizirane rešitve za zagotavljanje materiala za obogatitev okolja.
This Recommendation should be applied in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2008/120/EC and other relevant Union legislation applicable to the welfare of pigs,
To priporočilo bi bilo treba uporabljati v skladu z določbami Direktive 2008/120/ES in drugo ustrezno zakonodajo Unije, ki se uporablja za dobrobit prašičev –
When applying the general requirements on the prevention of tail-biting and thereby a reduction of routine tail-docking as laid down in Annex I to Directive 2008/120/EC, Member States should take account of the best practices guidance based on scientific knowledge set out in paragraphs 2 to 7.
Pri uporabi splošnih zahtev za preprečevanje grizenja repov in s tem zmanjšanje rutinskega krajšanja repov, kakor je določeno v Prilogi I k Direktivi 2008/120/ES, bi morale države članice upoštevati smernice o najboljših praksah, ki temeljijo na znanstvenih spoznanjih, iz odstavkov od 2 do 7.
ensure that farmers carry out a risk assessment of the incidence of tail-biting based on animal and non-animal based indicators (‘the risk assessment’);
zagotoviti, da kmetje opravljajo oceno tveganja pojava grizenja repov na podlagi z živalmi povezanih in nepovezanih kazalnikov („ocena tveganja“);
establish compliance criteria with the requirements set out in the legislation and make them publicly available on a website.
določiti merila skladnosti z zahtevami zakonodaje in jih javno objaviti na spletišču.
The following parameters should be checked when carrying out the risk assessment:
Pri izvedbi ocene tveganja bi bilo treba preveriti naslednje parametre:
the enrichment materials provided;
razpoložljivost materiala za obogatitev okolja;
cleanliness;
čistočo;
thermal comfort and air quality;
toplotno ustreznost in kakovost zraka;
competition for food and space;
tekmovanje za hrano in prostor;
diet.
prehrano.
Based on the results of the risk assessment, appropriate management changes in farms should be considered, such as supplying appropriate enrichment materials, comfortable environmental conditions, assuring a good health status and/or providing a balanced diet for pigs.
Na podlagi rezultatov ocene tveganja bi bilo treba razmisliti o ustreznih spremembah upravljanja na gospodarstvih, kot je zagotavljanje ustreznega materiala za obogatitev okolja, ustreznih bivalnih razmer nastanitve, dobrega zdravstvenega statusa in/ali uravnotežene prehrane za prašiče.
Enrichment materials should enable pigs to fulfil their essential needs without compromising their health.
Material za obogatitev okolja bi moral prašičem omogočati izpolnjevanje osnovnih potreb, ne da bi bilo pri tem ogroženo njihovo zdravje.
For that purpose, enrichment materials should be safe and have the following characteristics:
Zato bi moral biti material za obogatitev okolja varen in imeti naslednje značilnosti:
Edible so that pigs can eat or smell them, preferably with some nutritional benefits;
biti bi moral užiten, da ga prašiči lahko jejo ali vohajo, in po možnosti zagotavljati prehranske koristi;
Chewable so that pigs can bite them;
biti bi moral žvečljiv, da ga lahko prašiči grizejo;
Investigable so that pigs can investigate them;
omogočati bi moral raziskovanje, da prašiči lahko iščejo po njem;
Manipulable so that pigs can change their location, appearance or structure.
biti bi moral premičen in omogočati preoblikovanje, da ga prašiči lahko premikajo ali spremenijo njegov videz ali strukturo.
In addition to the characteristics listed in paragraph 4, enrichment materials should be provided in such a way that they are:
Poleg značilnosti, navedenih v odstavku 4, bi moralo za zagotovljeni material za obogatitev okolja veljati naslednje:
of sustainable interest, that is to say, they should encourage the exploratory behaviour of pigs and be regularly replaced and replenished;
pri njem se upošteva trajnostni interes, kar pomeni, da spodbuja raziskovalno vedenje prašičev ter se redno menja in dodaja;
accessible for oral manipulation;
živali ga lahko manipulirajo z rilcem;
given in sufficient quantity;
na voljo je v zadostni količini;
clean and hygienic.
je čist in higieničen.
In order to fulfil pigs' essential needs enrichments material should meet all the characteristics listed in paragraphs 4 and 5.
Za izpolnjevanje osnovnih potreb prašičev bi moral imeti material za obogatitev okolja vse značilnosti, navedene v odstavkih 4 in 5.
To that end, enrichments materials should be categorised as:
V ta namen se uporablja naslednja razvrstitev materiala za obogatitev okolja:
optimal materials materials possessing all the characteristics listed in paragraphs 4 and 5 and therefore such materials can be used alone;
optimalni material material, ki ima vse značilnosti, navedene v odstavkih 4 in 5, in se zato lahko uporablja sam;
suboptimal materials materials possessing most of the characteristics listed in paragraphs 4 and 5 and therefore such materials should be used in combination with other materials;
neoptimalni material material, ki ima večino značilnosti, navedenih v odstavkih 4 in 5, in bi ga bilo zato treba uporabljati v kombinaciji z drugimi materiali;
materials of marginal interest materials providing distraction for pigs which should not be considered as fulfilling their essential needs and therefore optimal or suboptimal materials should also be provided.
material postranskega interesa material, ki prašiče zamoti, vendar za katerega ne bi smelo veljati, da izpolnjuje njihove osnovne potrebe, zaradi česar bi bilo treba zagotoviti tudi optimalni ali neoptimalni material.
In order to check that pigs have access to sufficient and proper enrichment materials, Member States should ensure that farmers follow best practices regarding appropriate indicators to monitor the welfare of the pigs kept under their care.
Da bi preverile, ali imajo prašiči dostop do zadostne količine ustreznega materiala za obogatitev okolja, bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da kmetje upoštevajo najboljše prakse glede ustreznih kazalnikov za spremljanje dobrobiti prašičev v svoji oskrbi.
That assessment method for checking access to enrichment materials should include checks based on:
Ta ocenjevalna metoda za preverjanje dostopa do materiala za obogatitev okolja bi morala zajemati preglede na podlagi:
animal indicators, such as the presence of bitten tails, skin lesions and/or abnormal behaviour by pigs (such as a low level of interest in the enrichment materials provided, fights to use enrichment materials, biting elements other than the enrichment materials provided, rooting their faeces or in the case of sows, an increase in false nest building behaviour);
z živalmi povezanih kazalnikov, kot so prisotnost pogrizenih repov, kožnih poškodb in/ali nenormalnega vedenja prašičev (kot je majhno zanimanje za material za obogatitev okolja, ki je na voljo, spopadanje zanj, grizenje drugih elementov poleg materiala za obogatitev okolja, ritje po iztrebkih ali večja razširjenost pripravljanja gnezda pri nebrejih svinjah);
non-animal indicators, such as the frequency of renewal, accessibility, quantity and cleanliness of the enrichment materials provided.
z živalmi nepovezanih kazalnikov, kot so pogostost obnavljanja, dostopnost, količina in čistoča zagotovljenega materiala za obogatitev okolja.
The Commission should monitor the application of this Recommendation and provide more detailed information on the best practices referred to in paragraphs 2 to 7, in line with the latest and most pertinent scientific knowledge on a publicly available Commission's website.
Komisija bi morala spremljati izvajanje tega priporočila in na javno dostopnem spletišču Komisije objaviti podrobnejše informacije o najboljših praksah iz odstavkov od 2 do 7, ki so v skladu z najnovejšimi in najbolj relevantnimi znanstvenimi spoznanji.
Member States, with the active involvement of farmers, should perform appropriate dissemination of the best practices referred to in paragraphs 2 to 7.
Države članice bi morale ob aktivnem sodelovanju kmetov ustrezno razširjati najboljše prakse iz odstavkov od 2 do 7.
Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs (OJ L 47, 18.2.2009, p. 5).
Direktiva Sveta 2008/120/ES z dne 18. decembra 2008 o določitvi minimalnih pogojev za zaščito prašičev (UL L 47, 18.2.2009, str. 5).
Commission Recommendation (Euratom) 2016/538
Priporočilo Komisije (Euratom) 2016/538
of 4 April 2016
z dne 4. aprila 2016
on the application of Article 103 of the Euratom Treaty
o uporabi člena 103 Pogodbe Euratom
(notified under document C(2016) 1168)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2016) 1168)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 103 thereof in conjunction with Article 106a referring to Article 292 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti člena 103 Pogodbe v povezavi s členom 106a, ki se sklicuje na člen 292 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
One of the tasks of the Community, according to Article 2(h) of the Treaty, is to establish with other countries and international organisations such relations as will foster progress in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.
V skladu s členom 2(h) Pogodbe je ena od nalog Skupnosti, da z drugimi državami in mednarodnimi organizacijami vzpostavlja odnose, ki bodo spodbujali napredek pri miroljubni uporabi jedrske energije.
In order to achieve this task, the Community is endowed, pursuant to Chapter 10 of Title II of the Treaty, with powers in the field of external relations.
Da bi Skupnost lahko izvajala te naloge, je v skladu s poglavjem 10 naslova II Pogodbe pooblaščena za področje zunanjih odnosov.
According to Article 101 of the Treaty, the Community may, within the limits of its powers and jurisdiction, enter into obligations by concluding agreements or contracts with a third State, an international organisation or a national of a third State.
V skladu s členom 101 Pogodbe lahko Skupnost v okviru svojih pristojnosti prevzema obveznosti s sklepanjem sporazumov ali pogodb s tretjo državo, mednarodno organizacijo ali državljanom tretje države.
Pursuant to this provision, Euratom agreements have been concluded with the main supplier countries of the Community.
Na podlagi te določbe so bili z glavnimi državami dobaviteljicami Skupnosti sklenjeni sporazumi Euratom.
Article 102 on the other hand empowers the Community to enter into agreements to which, in addition to the Community, the Member States are also parties.
Po drugi strani člen 102 Skupnost pooblašča za sklepanje sporazumov, katerih pogodbenice so poleg Skupnosti tudi ena ali več držav članic.
Such agreements can be implemented as regards the Community only by means of a close association between the institutions of the Community and the Member States both in the process of negotiation and conclusion and in the fulfilment of the obligations entered into.
Taki sporazumi se, kar zadeva Skupnost, lahko izvajajo le v tesnem sodelovanju med institucijami Skupnosti in državami članicami, tako med pogajanji in sklepanjem kot pri izpolnjevanju prevzetih obveznosti.
In accordance with the Treaty, Member States retain, under the conditions foreseen in the Treaty, their treaty-making capacity as actors in the international scene and, consequently, have the right to conclude, at any time, bilateral agreements with third countries that concern matters within the purview of the Euratom Treaty.
V skladu s Pogodbo države članice pod pogoji iz Pogodbe ohranijo svojo sposobnost sklepanja pogodb kot akterji na mednarodnem prizorišču in imajo posledično pravico kadar koli skleniti dvostranske sporazume s tretjimi državami, ki zadevajo področje uporabe Pogodbe Euratom.
Article 103 of the Treaty plays a central role in reconciling the need to ensure the unity and primacy of Euratom law with Member States' freedom of action in conducting their external relations in the nuclear field.
Člen 103 Pogodbe igra osrednjo vlogo pri usklajevanju potrebe po zagotavljanju enotnosti in primarnosti prava Euratom s svobodo držav članic pri vodenju njihovih zunanjih odnosov na jedrskem področju.
Pursuant to this Article, Member States are to communicate to the Commission draft agreements or contracts with a third State, an international organisation or a national of a third State to the extent that such agreements or contracts concern matters within the purview of the Treaty.
Države članice morajo na podlagi tega člena Komisiji predložiti osnutke sporazumov ali pogodb s tretjo državo, mednarodno organizacijo ali državljanom tretje države, kolikor ti sporazumi ali pogodbe zadevajo področje uporabe Pogodbe.
If a draft agreement or contract contains clauses which impede the application of the Treaty, the Commission is to make its comments known to the Member State concerned within 1 month of receipt of such communication.
Če osnutek sporazuma ali pogodbe vsebuje klavzule, ki ovirajo uporabo Pogodbe, mora Komisija zadevni državi članici v enem mesecu po prejemu obvestila sporočiti svoje pripombe.
A Member State is not to conclude the proposed agreement or contract until it has satisfied the objections of the Commission or complied with a ruling of the Court of Justice adjudicating urgently on the compatibility of the proposed clauses with the provisions of the Treaty.
Država članica ne more skleniti predlaganega sporazuma ali pogodbe, dokler ne upošteva pripomb Komisije ali ravna v skladu z odločbami Sodišča, ki po hitrem postopku odloči o združljivosti predlaganih klavzul z določbami Pogodbe.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities, in its Ruling 1/78 of 14 November 1978, ruled that the aim of Article 103 was to ensure that the provisions of the Treaty are not frustrated by agreements or contracts concluded by the Member States with third parties [1].
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je v Odločitvi 1/78 z dne 14. novembra 1978 odločilo, da je cilj člena 103 zagotavljati, da sporazumi ali pogodbe, ki jih države članice sklenejo s tretjimi stranmi, ne ogrožajo določb Pogodbe [1].
An assessment pursuant to Article 103 extends to the compatibility of the draft agreement or contract with the provisions of the Euratom Treaty and the secondary legislation adopted on its basis.
Ocena na podlagi člena 103 zajema tudi skladnost osnutka sporazuma ali pogodbe z določbami Pogodbe Euratom in sekundarne zakonodaje, sprejete na njeni podlagi.
It does not extend to the compatibility of the draft agreement or contract with the provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Ne zajema pa skladnosti osnutka sporazuma ali pogodbe z določbami Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Considerable experience has been gained in the application of Article 103.
Pri uporabi člena 103 so se nabrale znatne izkušnje.
That experience shows that certain aspects of the Euratom acquis are of direct relevance in the context of Member States' external relations.
Navedene izkušnje kažejo, da so nekateri vidiki pravnega reda Euratom neposredno relevantni v okviru zunanjih odnosov držav članic.
The Commission has had to repeatedly draw attention to specific provisions of Euratom law in its comments to Member States following assessments under Article 103.
Komisija je morala po ocenah na podlagi člena 103 v svojih pripombah države članice nenehno opozarjati na posebne določbe prava Euratom.
Guidance is therefore needed on the application of Article 103.
Zato so potrebne smernice za uporabo člena 103.
The aim of this Recommendation is to recall the main provisions which are of relevance in this context and to provide increased clarity and legal certainty to the Member States when they negotiate their draft agreements or contracts.
Cilj tega priporočila je opozoriti na temeljne določbe, ki so v tem okviru relevantne, in zagotoviti večjo jasnost in pravno varnost za države članice pri pogajanjih o osnutkih sporazumov ali pogodb.
The 1 month period referred to in the second paragraph of Article 103 starts to run from the date on which the Commission is in receipt of the communication.
Enomesečno obdobje iz drugega odstavka člena 103 začne teči z datumom, ko Komisija prejme obvestilo.
Such receipt is to be deemed to have occurred only when the Commission is in possession of the complete notification file.
Šteje se, da je do prejema prišlo, šele ko ima Komisija v posesti popolno dokumentacijo o priglasitvi.
Decision No 994/2012/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] provides the Member States with the possibility of seeking the assistance of the Commission in the negotiation of international agreements which fall within the scope of that Decision.
Sklep št. 994/2012/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] državam članicam daje možnost, da pri pogajanjih o mednarodnih sporazumih, ki spadajo na področje uporabe navedenega sklepa, Komisijo zaprosijo za pomoč.
That same possibility should be available to the Member States when negotiating agreements or contracts falling within the scope of the Euratom Treaty.
Enaka možnost bi morala biti državam članicam na voljo pri pogajanjih o sporazumih ali pogodbah, ki spadajo na področje uporabe Pogodbe Euratom.
Nuclear research is within the purview of the Euratom Treaty, as provided for in Chapter 1 of Title II on the ‘Promotion of research’.
Jedrske raziskave spadajo na področje uporabe Pogodbe Euratom, kot to določa poglavje 1 naslova II o spodbujanju raziskav.
This Commission Recommendation therefore also covers research international agreements, whatever their designation, in the field of nuclear fission and fusion research.
To priporočilo Komisije tako zajema tudi mednarodne sporazume o raziskavah na področju jedrske cepitve in zlivanja, ne glede na njihovo poimenovanje.
The basic standards laid down by the Community pursuant to Chapter 3 of Title II of the Treaty, and in particular Council Directive 2009/71/Euratom [3], Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom [4] and Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom [5], aim to ensure the protection of the health of workers and the general public against the dangers of ionising radiation, irrespectively of the source of that radiation.
Namen temeljnih standardov, ki jih Skupnost določa na podlagi poglavja 3 naslova II Pogodbe, zlasti direktiv Sveta 2009/71/Euratom [3], 2011/70/Euratom [4] in 2013/59/Euratom [5], je zagotoviti varstvo zdravja delavcev in najširše javnosti pred nevarnostmi zaradi ionizirajočega sevanja, ne glede na vir navedenega sevanja.
They are at the core of the legal system set up by the Treaty and are therefore of central importance in the context of assessments under Article 103.
Navedeni standardi so v središču pravnega sistema, ki ga vzpostavlja Pogodba, in so zato osrednjega pomena za ocene na podlagi člena 103.
Chapter 6 of Title II of the Treaty establishes the Euratom Supply Agency and confers upon it an exclusive right to conclude contracts relating to the supply of ores, source materials and special fissile materials coming from inside the Community or from outside.
Poglavje 6 naslova II Pogodbe ustanavlja Agencijo za oskrbo Euratom in ji podeljuje izključno pravico sklepati pogodbe, ki se nanašajo na oskrbo z rudami, snovmi vira in posebnimi cepljivimi snovmi, ki izvirajo iz držav v Skupnosti ali zunaj nje.