natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Those minutes shall contain: an indication of the case; the date, time and place of the hearing; an indication, where applicable, that the case was heard in camera; the names of the Judges and the Registrar present; the names and status of the parties' representatives present; a reference to any observations on the summary report for the hearing; the surnames, forenames, status and permanent addresses of any witnesses or experts examined; an indication, where applicable, of the procedural documents or items produced at the hearing; and, in so far as is necessary, the statements made at the hearing and the decisions pronounced at the hearing by the Court or the President.
Ta se ne sme vložiti v zaupni različici in zato ne sme vsebovati zaupnih podatkov.
In accordance with Article 64 and subject to the provisions of Article 68(4), Article 104, Article 105(8) and Article 144(7) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court shall take into consideration only those procedural documents and items which have been made available to the representatives of the parties and on which they have been given an opportunity of expressing their views.
V predlogu za zaupno obravnavanje je treba navesti stranko, v razmerju do katere se predlaga zaupnost.
It follows that, without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 103 to 105 of the Rules of Procedure, no consideration may be given to an application by the applicant for certain information on the case-file to be treated as confidential in relation to the defendant.
Predlog za zaupno obravnavanje je treba omejiti na najnujnejše in se nikakor ne sme nanašati na celoten procesni akt in, razen izjemoma, na celotno prilogo.
Likewise, no such application may be made by the defendant in relation to the applicant.
Po navadi je namreč mogoče posredovati nezaupno različico procesnega akta in dokazil, v kateri so izločeni nekateri odlomki, besede ali številke, ne da bi to vplivalo na zadevne interese.
Nevertheless, a main party may apply for certain confidential information on the case-file to be excluded from the documents to be communicated to an intervener in accordance with Article 144(7) of the Rules of Procedure.
V predlogu za zaupno obravnavanje je treba natančno navesti zadevne podatke ali odlomke, vsebovati pa mora tudi obrazložitev zaupnosti vsakega od teh podatkov ali odlomkov.
Each party may also apply for certain information in the files concerned by the joinder to be excluded from the files to be examined by a party to the joined cases in accordance with Article 68(4) of the Rules of Procedure.
Če teh navedb ni, lahko Splošno sodišče predlog zavrne.
Where an application to intervene is made in a case, the main parties are requested to state, within the time limit prescribed by the Registrar to that effect, whether they wish to seek confidential treatment in respect of certain information included in the procedural documents already placed on the case-file.
Stranka mora ob vložitvi predloga za zaupno obravnavanje enega ali več procesnih aktov predložiti celotno nezaupno različico zadevnega ali zadevnih procesnih aktov ali dokazil, iz katerih so bili izločeni podatki ali odlomki, na katere se nanaša na predlog.
The main parties must submit simultaneously with any procedural document or item that they may lodge subsequently any application for confidential treatment that may be required in respect of the procedural document or item concerned.
Če predlog za zaupno obravnavanje ni v skladu s točkami 218, 219 in 222 zgoraj, sodni tajnik od zadevne stranke zahteva njegovo dopolnitev.
In the absence of such an application, the procedural documents and items lodged will be communicated to the intervener.
Če predlog za zaupno obravnavanje tudi po tej zahtevi ni v skladu zahtevami iz teh praktičnih določb za izvajanje, ga ne bo mogoče obravnavati, vsi zadevni procesni akti in dokazila pa bodo poslani intervenientu.
Any application for confidential treatment must be made by a separate document.
Če je predvidena združitev več zadev, se stranke pozove, naj v roku, ki ga določi sodni tajnik, navedejo, ali predlagajo zaupno obravnavanje nekaterih podatkov v procesnih aktih in dokazilih, ki so že bili vloženi v spisih v zadevah, na katere se nanaša združitev.
It may not be lodged as a confidential version and must not, therefore, contain confidential information.
Stranke morajo za vse procesne akte in dokazila, ki jih vložijo pozneje, hkrati ob njihovi vložitvi po potrebi podati predlog za zaupno obravnavanje.
An application for confidential treatment must specify the party in relation to whom confidentiality is requested.
Če tak predlog ne bo podan, bodo vloženi procesni akti in listine postali dostopni drugim strankam v združenih zadevah.
An application for confidential treatment must be limited to what is strictly necessary and may not in any event cover the entirety of a procedural document; only exceptionally may it extend to the entirety of an annexed document.
Točke od 218 do 223 zgoraj se uporabljajo za predloge za zaupno obravnavanje, ki se vložijo v primeru združitve zadev.
It should usually be possible to furnish a non-confidential version of a procedural document and items in which certain passages, words or figures have been deleted without affecting the interests it is sought to protect.
Splošno sodišče lahko na podlagi pripravljalnih ukrepov iz člena 91 Poslovnika stranki odredi predložitev podatkov ali dokazil v zvezi z zadevo.
An application for confidential treatment must accurately identify the particulars or passages to be excluded and state the reasons for which each of those particulars or passages is regarded as confidential.
V skladu s členom 92(3) Poslovnika se lahko taka predložitev odredi le, če zadevna stranka ni izpolnila v ta namen predhodno sprejetega ukrepa procesnega vodstva ali če to zahteva stranka, ki jo zadeva ukrep in ki utemelji nujnost takega ukrepa v obliki sklepa o pripravljalnem ukrepu.
Failure to provide such information may result in the application being refused by the Court.
Če se glavna stranka sklicuje na zaupnost podatkov ali dokazil, da bi nasprotovala njihovemu pošiljanju v odgovor na predlog za izdajo ukrepa procesnega vodstva ali da bi predlagala izdajo pripravljalnega ukrepa, Splošno sodišče, če meni, da bi ti podatki ali dokazila lahko bili pomembni za odločitev o sporu, odredi njihovo predložitev s sklepom o pripravljalnem ukrepu na podlagi člena 91(b) Poslovnika.
On lodging an application for confidential treatment in respect of one or more procedural documents, a party must produce a full non-confidential version of each procedural document and item concerned, with the confidential particulars or passages removed.
Obravnavanje zaupnih podatkov ali dokazil, ki so tako predloženi pred Splošnim sodiščem, ureja člen 103 Poslovnika.
Where an application for confidential treatment does not comply with points 218, 219 and 222 above, the Registrar shall request the party concerned to put the application in order.
Zadevna ureditev ne določa nobenega odstopanja od načela kontradiktornosti postopka, temveč določa podrobna pravila za njegovo izvajanje.
If, despite such a request, the application for confidential treatment is not made to comply with the requirements of these Practice Rules, it will not be possible for it to be properly processed, and a copy of every procedural document and item concerned will be communicated to the intervener.
Splošno sodišče na podlagi te določbe preuči, ali so podatki oziroma dokazila pomembni za odločitev o sporu, in preveri njihovo zaupnost.
Where it is envisaged that several cases will be joined, the parties are requested to state, within the time limit prescribed by the Registrar to that effect, whether they wish to seek confidential treatment in respect of certain information included in the procedural documents and material already placed on the files of the cases concerned by the joinder.
Če Splošno sodišče meni, da so zadevne informacije pomembne za odločitev o sporu in hkrati zaupne, njihovo zaupno naravo pretehta z zahtevami, povezanimi s pravico do učinkovitega sodnega varstva, zlasti s spoštovanjem načela kontradiktornosti, in ima na koncu te presoje dve izbiri.
The parties must submit simultaneously with any procedural document or item that they may lodge subsequently any application for confidential treatment that may be required in respect of the procedural document or item concerned.
Splošno sodišče lahko odloči, da s podatkom ali dokazilom kljub njegovi zaupnosti seznani nasprotno glavno stranko.
In the absence of such an application, the procedural documents and items lodged will be made available to the other parties in the joined cases.
Splošno sodišče lahko v zvezi s tem ukrepom procesnega vodstva zastopnike strank, ki niso stranka, ki je predložila zaupne podatke, pozove k podpisu sporazuma o varovanju zaupnosti dokumenta ali dokazila, tako da podatkov, s katerimi so se seznanili, ne bodo posredovali svojim pooblastiteljem ali tretjim osebam.
Points 218 to 223 above shall apply to applications for confidential treatment submitted where cases are joined.
Za vse kršitve tega sporazuma je mogoče uporabiti člen 55 Poslovnika.
The Court may, pursuant to the measures of inquiry referred to in Article 91 of the Rules of Procedure, order a party to produce information or material relating to the case.
Alternativno lahko Splošno sodišče odloči, da zaupnih podatkov ne posreduje, nasprotni glavni stranki pa omogoči, da ima na voljo nezaupne podatke, da lahko kar najbolje uveljavlja svoja stališča v skladu z načelom kontradiktornosti.
In accordance with Article 92(3) of the Rules of Procedure, such production may be ordered only where the party concerned has not complied with a measure of organisation of procedure previously adopted to that end, or where expressly requested by the party concerned by the measure and that party explains the need for such a measure to be in the form of an order for a measure of inquiry.
Splošno sodišče zato odredi glavni stranki, ki je predložila zaupne podatke, da posreduje nekatere informacije na način, ki omogoča uskladitev varovanja zaupnosti podatkov in kontradiktornosti postopka.
Where a main party submits in his response to an application for a measure of organisation of procedure that certain information or material is confidential and he therefore objects to its transmission or proposes that a measure of inquiry be adopted, the Court shall, if it considers that that information or material may be relevant in order for it to rule in the case, order its production by means of an order for a measure of inquiry under Article 91(b) of the Rules of Procedure.
Informacijo bo mogoče na primer posredovati v skrajšani obliki.
The treatment of confidential information or material thus produced before the Court shall be governed by Article 103 of the Rules of Procedure.
Če Splošno sodišče meni, da nasprotna glavna stranka ne more učinkovito uresničevati pravice do obrambe, lahko sprejme sklep, celo več sklepov, vse dokler ne meni, da je mogoče postopek učinkovito nadaljevati kontradiktorno.
The regime in question does not provide for any derogation from the principle of the adversarial nature of the proceedings, but lays down the rules for the implementation of that principle.
Če Splošno sodišče meni, da je posredovanje informacije nasprotni glavni stranki, ki je bila zagotovljena na načine, določene s sklepom, sprejetim na podlagi člena 103(3) Poslovnika, tej stranki omogočilo, da kar najbolje uveljavlja svoja stališča, Splošno sodišče zaupnih podatkov ali dokazil, s katerimi se ta stranka ni seznanila, ne upošteva in jih vrne glavni stranki, ki jih je predložila.
In accordance with that provision, the Court shall examine the relevance of the information or material to the outcome of the proceedings and verify the confidential nature of that information or material.
Splošno sodišče lahko v okviru nadzora nad zakonitostjo akta institucije, s katerim je ta zavrnila dostop do dokumenta, odredi predložitev tega dokumenta s pripravljalnim ukrepom, sprejetim na podlagi člena 91(c) Poslovnika.
If it considers that the information concerned is both relevant to the outcome of the proceedings and confidential, the Court shall weigh that confidentiality against the requirements linked to the right to effective judicial protection, particularly observance of the adversarial principle, and, after weighing up those matters, will have two options.
Dokument, ki ga predloži institucija, se ne posreduje drugim strankam, saj bi s tem spor postal brezpredmeten.
The Court may decide that the information or material must be brought to the attention of the other main party, notwithstanding its confidential nature.
V skladu s členom 105(1) in (2) Poslovnika lahko glavna stranka v sporu prostovoljno ali na podlagi pripravljalnega ukrepa Splošnega sodišča predloži podatke ali dokazila, ki se nanašajo na varnost Evropske unije ali varnost ene ali več njenih držav članic ali na vodenje njihovih mednarodnih odnosov.
In that respect, the Court may, by way of a measure of organisation of procedure, request the representatives of the parties other than the party who produced the confidential information to give an undertaking to preserve the confidentiality of the document or item by not communicating to their respective clients or to a third party the information that is to be disclosed to them.
Odstavki od 3 do 10 tega člena določajo postopkovno ureditev, ki se uporablja za take podatke ali dokazila.
Any breach of that undertaking may result in Article 55 of the Rules of Procedure being applied.
Upoštevajoč občutljivost in zaupnost podatkov ali dokazil, ki se nanašajo na varnost Evropske unije ali varnost ene ali več njenih držav članic ali na vodenje njihovih mednarodnih odnosov, je za izvajanje ureditve, vzpostavljene s členom 105 Poslovnika, potrebna vzpostavitev ustrezne varovalke, da se zagotovi visoka raven varstva teh podatkov ali dokazil.
Alternatively, the Court may decide not to communicate the confidential information, whilst nevertheless ensuring that the other main party is provided with non-confidential information so that he can, to the greatest extent possible, make his views known in compliance with the adversarial principle.
To varovalko je Splošno sodišče določilo v odločbi, sprejeti na podlagi člena 105(11) Poslovnika.
The Court shall then order the main party who produced the confidential information to communicate certain particulars in such a way as to enable the preservation of the confidentiality of the information to be reconciled with the adversarial nature of the proceedings.
V skladu s členom 227(3) Poslovnika se člen 105 uporablja po začetku veljavnosti odločbe iz člena 105(11).
It will, for example, be possible for the information to be transmitted in summarised form.
V skladu s členom 147(2) Poslovnika je treba pri vložitvi prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč obvezno uporabiti obrazec.
If the Court considers that the other main party cannot properly exercise his rights of defence, it may make one or more orders, until it considers that the proceedings can properly be continued on an adversarial basis.
Ta obrazec je dostopen na spletnem mestu Sodišča Evropske unije.
Where the Court considers that the communication of information to the other main party in accordance with the procedures prescribed by the order made under Article 103(3) of the Rules of Procedure has enabled that party to present his views effectively, the confidential information or material which has not been brought to the attention of that party shall not be taken into consideration by the Court and shall be returned to the main party who produced it.
Prosilec za brezplačno pravno pomoč, ki ga ob vložitvi obrazca prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč ne zastopa odvetnik, lahko pravilno izpolnjen in podpisan obrazec v papirnati obliki vloži v sodnem tajništvu po pošti ali v samem uradu, po potrebi po posredovanju prepisa izvirnika tega obrazca po telefaksu.
In the context of its review of the legality of a measure adopted by an institution denying access to a document, the Court may, by way of a measure of inquiry under Article 91(c) of the Rules of Procedure, order that the document be produced.
V primeru uporabe telefaksa se uporabijo točke od 78 do 81 zgoraj.
The document produced by the institution shall not be communicated to the other parties, as the action would otherwise be devoid of purpose.
Kadar prosilca za brezplačno pravno pomoč ob vložitvi obrazca prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč zastopa odvetnik, se vložitev opravi na podlagi člena 72(1) Poslovnika ob upoštevanju zahtev iz točk od 74 do 85 zgoraj.
In accordance with Article 105(1) and (2) of the Rules of Procedure, a main party to the proceedings may, on his own initiative or following a measure of inquiry ordered by the Court, produce information or material pertaining to the security of the European Union or to that of one or more of its Member States or to the conduct of their international relations.
Obrazec prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč naj bi Splošnemu sodišču omogočil, da v skladu s členom 147(3) in (4) Poslovnika pridobi podatke za ustrezno odločitev o prošnji za brezplačno pravno pomoč.
Article 105(3) to (10) lays down the procedural rules applicable to such information or material.
Gre za:
In view of the sensitive, confidential nature of information or material pertaining to the security of the Union or to that of one or more of its Member States or to the conduct of their international relations, the application of the body of rules established by Article 105 of the Rules of Procedure requires a suitable security framework to be set up in order to ensure a high level of protection for that information or material.
podatke o premoženjskem stanju prosilca
That framework shall be documented in the decision of the Court taken under Article 105(11) of the Rules of Procedure.
če tožba še ni bila vložena, podatke o predmetu tožbe, dejanskem stanju v zadevi in trditvah v zvezi s tožbo.
According to Article 227(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the provisions of Article 105 shall apply only from the entry into force of the decision referred to in Article 105(11).
Prosilec mora skupaj z obrazcem prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč predložiti dokazila, ki utemeljujejo podatke iz točke 241 zgoraj.
In accordance with Article 147(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the use of a form in making an application for legal aid shall be compulsory.
Po potrebi se skupaj z obrazcem prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč predložijo dokumenti iz členov 51(2) in (3) ter 78(3) Poslovnika.
The form is available on the internet site of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Kadar prosilca za brezplačno pravno pomoč ob vložitvi obrazca prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč zastopa odvetnik, mora obrazec vsebovati tudi izjavo iz člena 77(1) Poslovnika.
An applicant for legal aid who is not represented by a lawyer when the legal aid form is lodged may lodge the duly completed and signed paper form at the Registry by post or by hand, where appropriate after transmission of a copy of the original of that form by fax In the event of transmission by fax, points 78 to 81 above shall apply.
Pravilno izpolnjen obrazec prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč in potrdila morajo biti razumljivi sami po sebi.
Where the applicant for legal aid is represented by a lawyer when the legal aid form is lodged, the form shall be lodged in accordance with Article 72(1) of the Rules of Procedure, taking into account the requirements of points 74 to 85 above.
Brez poseganja v možnost Splošnega sodišča, da na podlagi členov 89 in 90 Poslovnika zahteva podatke ali predložitev dodatnih dokumentov, prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč ni mogoče dopolniti z naknadno vložitvijo dodatkov.
The legal aid form is intended to provide the Court, in accordance with Article 147(3) and (4) of the Rules of Procedure, with the information required to give an effective decision on the application for legal aid.
Taki dodatki, če so bili vloženi, ne da bi jih Splošno sodišče zahtevalo, bodo zavrnjeni.
The information required concerns:
V izjemnih primerih je mogoče dokazila o šibkem premoženjskem stanju prosilca vseeno sprejeti pozneje, če je njihova pozna vložitev primerno pojasnjena.
the legal aid applicant's financial situation,
V skladu s členom 147(7) Poslovnika z vložitvijo prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč preneha teči rok za vložitev tožbe, na katero se prošnja nanaša, in sicer do dneva vročitve sklepa, s katerim je o prošnji odločeno, ali če v tem sklepu odvetnik za zastopanje prosilca za brezplačno pravno pomoč ni določen, do dneva vročitve sklepa o določitvi odvetnika, ki ga bo zastopal.
where the action has not yet been brought, the subject-matter of that action, the facts of the case and the arguments relating thereto.
Ker z vložitvijo prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč preneha teči rok za vložitev tožbe do vročitve sklepa iz točke 247 zgoraj, je lahko preostali del roka za vložitev tožbe izjemno kratek.
The legal aid applicant shall be required to produce, together with the legal aid form, documentary evidence to support the information referred to in point 241 above.
Zato se upravičencu do brezplačne pravne pomoči, ki ga pravilno zastopa odvetnik, priporoča, naj posebno pozornost nameni spoštovanju zakonskega roka.
Where applicable, the documents referred to in Article 51(2) and (3) and Article 78(3) of the Rules of Procedure must be produced together with the legal aid form.
V skladu s členom 152(1) Poslovnika se predlog za obravnavanje po hitrem postopku vloži z ločeno vlogo, glede na okoliščine primera, hkrati s tožbo ali odgovorom na tožbo in mora vsebovati obrazložitev posebne nujnosti zadeve in drugih upoštevnih okoliščin.
Where the applicant for legal aid is represented by a lawyer when the legal aid form is lodged, the form must also contain the statement referred to in Article 77(1) of the Rules of Procedure.
Da bi se sodnemu tajništvu olajšalo takojšnje obravnavanje, je treba na prvi strani predloga za obravnavanje po hitrem postopku navesti, da je vložen na podlagi členov 151 in 152 Poslovnika.
The duly completed legal aid form and supporting documents must be intelligible in themselves.
Tožba, v zvezi s katero se predlaga obravnavanje po hitrem postopku, načeloma ne sme biti daljša od 25 strani.
Without prejudice to the Court's power to request information or the production of further documents under Articles 89 and 90 of the Rules of Procedure, the application for legal aid may not be supplemented by the subsequent filing of additional material.
Predložiti jo je treba v skladu z zahtevami, navedenimi v točkah od 123 do 134 zgoraj.
Such material shall be rejected, unless it has been lodged at the request of the Court.
Priporočljivo je, da stranka, ki predlaga obravnavanje po hitrem postopku, v predlogu opredeli razloge, trditve ali odstavke zadevne vloge (tožbe ali odgovora na tožbo), ki so predloženi le za primer, če se zadeva ne bo obravnavala po tem postopku.
In exceptional cases, supporting documents intended to establish the applicant's lack of means may nevertheless be accepted subsequently, subject to the delay in their production being adequately explained.
Ti podatki, določeni v členu 152(2) Poslovnika, morajo biti v predlogu natančno opredeljeni in morajo vsebovati številke zadevnih odstavkov.
Under Article 147(7) of the Rules of Procedure, the introduction of an application for legal aid shall suspend the time limit prescribed for the bringing of the action to which the application refers until the date of service of the order making a decision on that application or, where no lawyer is designated in that order to represent the applicant for legal aid, until the date of service of the order designating the lawyer instructed to represent him.
Priporočljivo je, da se k predlogu za obravnavanje po hitrem postopku, ki vsebuje podatke iz točke 252 zgoraj, priloži skrajšana različica zadevne vloge.
Since the lodging of an application for legal aid has the effect of suspending the time limit prescribed for bringing an action until service of the order referred to in point 247 above, the remaining period within which the application initiating proceedings may be lodged may be very short.
Kadar je priložena skrajšana različica, je treba upoštevati ta navodila: