natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When submitting its application, any airline which proposes a service to a public body offering to grant start-up aid must provide a business plan showing, over a substantial period, the viability of the route after the aid has expired.
Glej sporočilo Komisije državam članicam (UL C 307, 31.11.1993, str. 3), točka 36.
The public body should also carry out an analysis of the impact of the new route on competing routes prior to granting start-up aid
Glej na primer zadevo C-372/97, Italija proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Neither Italy nor interested parties have provided evidence in the investigation that carriers had to provide a business plan for the routes in question beforehand to demonstrate the viability of the route in question on a standalone basis after a certain period.
2004, str.
Neither has So.Ge.A.AL claimed to have carried out an assessment of the impact of the new routes in question on other routes.
I-3679, točka 44.
This condition is therefore not observed.
UL C 119, 22.5.2002, str. 22.
States must ensure that the list of routes receiving aid is published annually for each airport, in each instance indicating the source of public funding, the recipient company, the amount of aid paid and the number of passengers concerned
Točka 25(v) smernic za letalski sektor iz leta 2014.
There is no indication that Alghero airport published yearly the list of routes receiving public financing, indicating the source of financing, the air carrier, the amount of aid actually paid and the number of passengers carried.
Glej na primer sklep Komisije v zadevi SA.34586 – Grčija – Posodobitev letališča Chania, uvodna izjava 49.
Where applicable, appeal procedures must be provided for at Member State level to ensure that there is no discrimination in the granting of aid
„Obnova“ starega terminala iz preglednice 5 je povezana s povečanjem/izgradnjo novega terminala, torej je vključena v opis pomoči za novi terminal.
Italy has not claimed that appeal procedures were in place to deal with complaints regarding the granting of the aid to carriers operating routes from Alghero airport.
Kot je bilo določeno v „Programma di Intervento ‚Investimenti‘ of the Programma di sviluppo per l'affidamento della gestione quarantennale “, odobrenem septembra 2005.
Penalty mechanisms must be implemented in the event that a carrier fails to keep to the undertakings that it gave in relation to an airport when the aid was paid.
Točki 137 in 113 smernic za letalski sektor iz leta 2014.
A system for recovering aid or for seizing a guarantee initially deposited by the carrier will allow the airport to ensure that the airline honours its commitments
Točki 137 in 120 smernic za letalski sektor iz leta 2014.
The Commission notes that the agreements with the carriers lay down a system of penalties in case the airlines to not observe the traffic targets stipulated therein.
Točki 137 in 116 smernic za letalski sektor iz leta 2014.
This condition is thus fulfilled.
Točki 137 in 124 smernic za letalski sektor iz leta 2014.
Start-up aid cannot be combined with other types of aid granted for the operation of a route, such as aid of a social nature granted to certain categories of passengers and compensation for discharging public services.
Točki 137 in 125 smernic za letalski sektor iz leta 2014.
In addition, such aid cannot be granted when access to a route has been reserved for a single carrier under Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92, and in particular paragraph 1(d) of that Article.
Točki 137 in 131 smernic za letalski sektor iz leta 2014.
Also, in accordance with the rules of proportionality, such aid cannot be combined with other aid granted to cover the same costs, including aid paid in another State
Glej na primer sodbo v zadevi C-278/00, Grčija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2004, str.
Italy confirmed that the aid in question was not granted for the start-up of routes subject to PSOs under Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.
I-03997, sodbo v zadevi C-482/99, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str.
However, Italy has not confirmed that the aid was not combined with other aid to cover the same costs.
I-04397, in sodbo v združenih zadevah C-328/99 in C-399/00, Italija in SIM 2 Multimedia proti Komisiji, Recueil 2003, str.
Therefore, the aid to the airlines cannot be found to constitute compatible start-up aid under the 2005 Aviation Guidelines.
I-04035, točka 33.
The State aid implemented for Meridiana and Germanwings therefore constitutes unlawful and incompatible State aid that must be recovered.
Sodba v zadevi Stardust Marine, že navedena, točki 52 in 53.
CONCLUSION
Sodba v zadevi Stardust Marine, že navedena, točka 56.
Therefore, the Commission finds that:
Sodba v zadevi C-482/99, Francija proti Komisiji, že navedena.
Italy implemented investment aid to Alghero airport in violation of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Smernice za letalski sektor iz leta 2014, točka 53.
The investment aid is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty;
Smernice za letalski sektor iz leta 2014, točka 66.
Italy implemented operating aid to Alghero airport in violation of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Poročilo o udeležencu v tržnem gospodarstvu iz leta 2011.
The operating aid is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty;
Sodba v zadevi Charleroi, že navedena, točka 59.
The airport services (or handling) agreements and the marketing agreements concluded by So.Ge.A.AL with Ryanair, Air One/Alitalia, Volare, bmibaby, Air Vallée and Air Italy do not constitute State aid;
To se nanaša na prihodke, ki jih upravljavec letališča prejme zaradi dodatnega posla z avtomobilskimi parkirišči, trgovinami, restavracijami itd., ustvarijo pa jih dodatni potniki.
The handling and marketing agreements concluded by So.Ge.A.AL with Meridiana and Germanwings constitute unlawful and incompatible State aid.
Delež oziroma koeficient zasedenosti je opredeljen kot delež sedežev, zasedenih na letalu, ki leti na zadevni ruti.
RECOVERY
V analizo je vključena „končna vrednost“, s katero se upoštevajo prihodnje koristi za družbo So.Ge.A.AL po prenehanju sporazumov iz let 2006 in 2010 (glej uvodno izjavo 471), izključeno pa obdobje, za katero sta sporazuma iz let 2006 in 2010 veljala za nazaj (glej uvodno izjavo 485).
In accordance with the Treaty and the Court of Justice's established case-law, the Commission is competent to decide that the Member State concerned must abolish or alter aid [138] when it has found that it is incompatible with the internal market.
Uporabljene so bile referenčne stopnje Komisije za diskontiranje pričakovanih denarnih tokov.
The Court has also consistently held that the obligation on a State to abolish aid regarded by the Commission as being incompatible with the internal market is designed to re-establish the previously existing situation [139].
Podatki o dodatnih stroških, ki so se uporabili v regresiji, so iz časa pred sklenitvijo sporazumov o letaliških storitev iz let 2006 in 2010 in bi bili na voljo družbi So.Ge.A.AL na datum, ko je upravljavec letališča sklenil zadevna sporazuma.
In that context, the Court has stated that that objective is attained once the recipient has repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to the payment of the aid is restored [140].
Podatki o stroških so na voljo le za obdobje 1998–2010, zato bi bile v primeru, če bi se podoben pristop uporabil za sporazume iz let 2000, 2002 in 2003, na voljo le dve, tri oziroma štiri podatkovne točke za izvedbo regresijske analize, kar pa ni dovolj za zanesljive rezultate.
Following that case-law, Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/99 [141] laid down that ‘where negative decisions are taken in respect of unlawful aid, the Commission shall decide that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary.’
Regresija za navedene sporazume zato temelji na podatkih o stroških za obdobje 1998–2010.
Therefore, the State aid mentioned in Table 19 implemented for Meridiana and Germanwings must be reimbursed to Italy insofar as it has been paid out.
Stroški materialov, oglaševanja, nepremične opreme, goriva, vstopnih kuponov, gradivo za pomoč, oznake za prtljago in uniforme za zaposlene.
Regarding the amounts to be recovered, the Commission will consider the ex ante analysis of expected incremental costs and revenues of the agreements as set out in Table 19, with the following additional considerations:
Stroški avtomobilskih zavarovanj, vzdrževanja in popravila opreme in vozil, drugi stroški za vozila, radijske frekvence in vzdrževanje opreme za prijavo na let.
For each agreement or combination of agreements at stake, the annual aid amount to recover should correspond to the annual negative incremental cash flow at the time when the decision was taken to sign the agreement, for each year of application of the contract.
Od leta 2003 se letne koncesijske dajatve, ki jih plačajo upravljavci letališč, določijo na podlagi podatkov o prometu, ki jih letno objavi organ ENAC ministrstva za infrastrukturo in promet.
Those negative cash flows correspond to the amount of financing needed for the net present value of the agreement to be positive, thus for the agreement to be market conform.
V zvezi s tem glej uvodno izjavo 156 tega sklepa.
The Commission considers that the timeframe to take into consideration for the profitability analysis for Germanwings is 2007.
Neto sedanja vrednost časovne vrste pričakovanih denarnih pritokov in odtokov je opredeljena kot diskontirana vsota posameznih pričakovanih denarnih tokov v ustreznem obdobju.
As mentioned in recital 117, Germanwings operated from Alghero airport only in 2007.
Neto sedanja vrednost je običajno orodje, ki ga podjetja uporabljajo za oceno donosnosti projekta.
Indeed, the effective advantage received by the airline company is limited to the effective duration of the agreements at stake, as once the agreement has been terminated, Germanwings has not received any more advantage from the airport.
Zapisnik sestanka upravnega odbora družbe So.Ge.A.AL z dne 7. julija 2009.
Table 23 indicates the indicative recovery amounts (negative incremental flows) with the corresponding reductions for the Germanwings agreement which has not run its full duration.
Zapisnik sestanka upravnega odbora družbe So.Ge.A.AL z dne 9. septembra 2009.
Table 23
Zapisnik sestanka upravnega odbora družbe So.Ge.A.AL z dne 23. februarja 2010.
Information about the indicative amounts of aid received, to be recovered and already recovered
Čeprav je bila ta strategija uspešna in je družba So.Ge.A.AL dosegla precejšnje povečanje obsega prometa v skladu s svojimi pričakovanju, upravljavec letališča rasti prometa kljub finančni podpori javnih organov ni mogel uskladiti z večjo donosnostjo.
Identity of the beneficiary
Razlog za to je bila zlasti precejšnja zamuda pri dodelitvi „celovite“ koncesije.
Total indicative amount of aid received (in EUR)
Koeficient zasedenosti za družbi Germanwings in Meridiana je določen v sporazumih z družbo So.Ge.A.AL.
Total indicative amount of aid to be recovered (in EUR)
Koeficient zasedenosti za družbo Volare temelji na predhodnem poznavanju, ki ga ima družba So.Ge.A.AL o delovanju letalskega prevoznika.
(Principal)
Družba Volare je obratovala več notranjih rut, zato se je predvidel nižji koeficient zasedenosti.
Total amount already reimbursed (in EUR)
V primeru družbe Alitalia napovedi glede prometa niso temeljile na določeni predpostavki glede koeficienta zasedenosti, saj je družba Alitalia uporabljala več modelov letal (z največjim številom sedežev na letalih od 90 do 180), odvisno od dneva v tednu in od sezone.
Principal
Napovedi glede prometa so se pridobile na podlagi predhodnih izkušenj in poznavanja delovanja letalskega prevoznika.
Recovery interest
Z 2,45-odstotno diskontno stopnjo.
To take account of the actual advantage received by the airlines and its subsidiaries under the agreements, the amounts indicated in Table 23 may be adjusted, according to the supporting evidence provided by Italy, based on (i) the difference between, on the one hand, actual payments as presented ex post, that were made by the airlines with regard to the airport charges and, on the other hand, the forecasted cash flows (ex ante) on these items of income and shown in Table 19, and (ii) the difference between, on the one hand, the actual marketing payments as presented ex post which were paid to the airlines under marketing agreements and, other the other hand, the marketing costs as foreseen ex ante, corresponding to the amounts indicated in Table 19.
S 6,42-odstotno diskontno stopnjo.
In addition, Italy has to add to the aid amount the recovery interests, calculated from the date on which the unlawful aid was at the disposal of the beneficiary until the date of its recovery [142], according to Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [143].
Z 2,24-odstotno diskontno stopnjo.
As in the case at stake cash flows corresponding to the aid amounts are complex and were paid at different dates throughout the year, and both contracts only ran for one year each, the Commission considers that it is acceptable for the calculation of the recovery interests to consider that the time of payment of the aid to Germanwings and Meridiana is the date of (early) termination of the respective agreements.
Zaradi manjših zavez glede prometa ni bilo potrebno dodatno osebje za zagotavljanje storitev družbi Air Vallée ali bmibaby.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
S 5,55-odstotno diskontno stopnjo.
Article 1
S 6-odstotno diskontno stopnjo.
The direct grants for infrastructure, fittings and works and equipment which Italy granted to Alghero airport constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Sodba v zadevi 730/79, Philip Morris Holland BV proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, Recueil 1980, str. 2671, točka 11, in sodba v združenih zadevah T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97 do 607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98 do T-6/98 in T-23/98, Alzetta Mauro in drugi proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, Recueil 2000, str.
The State aid was granted by Italy in violation of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
II-02319, točka 80.
The State aid referred to in paragraph 1 is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Sodna v zadevi 730/79, Philip Morris Holland BV proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, Recueil 1980, str. 2671, točki 11 in 12, ter sodba v zadevi T-214/95, Het Vlaamse Gewest (Flamska regija) proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, Recueil 1998, str.
Article 2
II-717, točke 48 do 50.
The capital injections which Italy implemented for Alghero airport constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2407/92 z dne 23. julija 1992 o licenciranju letalskih prevoznikov (UL L 240, 24.8.1992, str.
Article 3
1), Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2408/92 z dne 23. julija 1992 o dostopu letalskih prevoznikov Skupnosti do letalskih prog znotraj Skupnosti (UL L 240, 24.8.1992, str.
The measures which Italy implemented for Ryanair, Air One/Alitalia, Volare, bmibaby, Air Vallée and Air Italy do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
8) in Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2409/92 z dne 23. julija 1992 o prevozninah in tarifah za zračni prevoz (UL L 240, 24.8.1992, str. 15).
Article 4
Zadeva C-305/89, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1991, str.
The measures which Italy implemented for Meridiana and Germanwings constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
I-1603, točka 26.
The State aid referred to in paragraph 1 is incompatible with the internal market.
Po začetku veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008 je bila Uredba (EGS) št. 2407/92 razveljavljena, v skladu s členom 27 Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008 pa se sklicevanja na razveljavljeno uredbo štejejo za sklicevanja na Uredbo (ES) št. 1008/2008.
Article 5
Uredba (EGS) št. 2408/92.
Italy shall recover the incompatible State aid referred to in Article 4 from the beneficiaries.
Kakor je določeno v členu 2(m) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were deemed to be put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
Sodba v zadevi C-70/72, Komisija proti Nemčiji, Recueil 1973, str. 813, točka 13.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Sodba v združenih zadevah C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1994, str.
Italy shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 4 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
I-04103, točka 75.
Article 6
Sodba v zadevi C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 5 shall be immediate and effective.
I-3671, točki 64 in 65.
Italy shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of its notification.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Italy shall submit the following information:
Uredba (ES) št. 659/99, že navedena, odstavek 2 člena 14.
the total amount of aid received by the beneficiaries;
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
Komisija je za dodatne informacije zaprosila z dopisom z dne 14. marca 2005.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
Potem ko se je Komisija strinjala s podaljšanjem roka, je Italija zahtevane informacije predložila z dopisom z dne 17. junija 2005.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
Italija je z dopisom z dne 30. junija 2005 Komisiji predložila dodatne informacije.
Italy shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 4 has been completed.
Italija je navedeno zahtevo delno izpolnila z dopisom z dne 17. januarja 2007.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Komisija je Italijo za dodatne informacije zaprosila z dopisom z dne 19. februarja 2007.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Italija je na navedeno zahtevo odgovorila z dopisoma z dne 16. marca 2007 in 26. marca 2007.
Article 8
Italija je z dopisoma z dne 15. oktobra 2007 in 22. oktobra 2007 Komisijo zaprosila za podaljšanje roka za predložitev pripomb glede presoje v odločbi iz leta 2007.
This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.
Komisija je rok podaljšala z dopisom z dne 23. oktobra 2007.
Done at Brussels, 1 October 2014.
Italija je svoje pripombe glede odločbe iz leta 2007 predložila 14. novembra 2007.
For the Commission
Družba Ryanair je svoje pripombe glede presoje v odločbi iz leta 2007 predložila 18. februarja 2008.
Vice-President
Družba So.Ge.A.AL je svoje pripombe predložila na isti datum.
OJ C 38, 12.2.2008, p. 19 and OJ C 40, 12.2.2013, p. 15.
Komisija je navedeni dopis 10. decembra 2008 poslala Italiji, da bi ta lahko predložila pripombe.
Judgment of 10.5.2006 in case T-395/04, Air One SpA v Commission of the European Union [2006], ECR II — 1347.
Italijanski organi so z dopisom z dne 15. januarja 2009 zaprosili za podaljšanje roka za predložitev pripomb glede dopisa družbe Air One.
OJ C 12, 17.1.2008, p. 7.
Komisija je rok podaljšala z dopisom z dne 20. januarja 2009.
See footnote 1.
Italija je svoje pripombe Komisiji predložila 13. februarja 2009.
OJ C 99, 4.4.2014, p. 3.
Italija je z dopisoma z dne 23. maja 2011 in 30. maja 2011 zaprosila za podaljšanje roka za predložitev informacij, ki jih je Komisija zahtevala 30. marca 2011.
OJ C 312, 9.12.2005, p. 1.
Italija je z istim dopisom zaprosila za prevod poročila družbe Ecorys v italijanski jezik.
See http://servizi.aci.it/distanze-chilometriche-web.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 19. oktobra 2011 Italiji posredovala odgovor družbe Ryanair z dne 22. julija 2011.
In the course of the investigation Italy informed the Commission that the legal successor of Volare is CAI Second S.p.A., a subsidiary of Alitalia — Compagnia Aerea Italiana S.p.A.
Italija je z dopisom z dne 16. novembra 2011 zaprosila za podaljšanje roka za predložitev pripomb.
Likewise, Air One S.p.A. merged with Alitalia — Compagnia Aerea Italiana S.p.A.
Komisija je 23. januarja 2012 Italiji poslala poročilo o načelu udeleženca v tržnem gospodarstvu iz leta 2011 v italijanskem jeziku.
RAS holds 100 % of the share capital of SFIRS.
Italija je 15. februarja 2012 predložila pripombe glede dopisa družbe Ryanair, zlasti glede poročila o načelu udeleženca v tržnem gospodarstvu iz leta 2011.
SFIRS prepares plans and programmes and drafts guidelines targeting the region's economic and social development.
Italija je svoje pripombe glede sklepa iz leta 2012 predložila 31. avgusta 2012, 3. oktobra 2012, 19. oktobra 2012, 22. oktobra 2012 in 20. februarja 2013.
Airport infrastructure is owned by ENAC, which either operates it directly or assigns it to third parties via concessions.
Komisija je prejela pripombe štirih zainteresiranih strani: družb So.Ge.A.AL, Ryanair, Airport Marketing Services Ltd. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba AMS) in Unioncamere.
Traditionally, four types of airport management models existed in Italy: (i) airports managed directly by the State, which was responsible for the construction and maintenance of all airport infrastructure, incurred all costs and retained all revenue; (ii) airports managed under a temporary concession, in which case the airport manager, on the basis of a temporary authorisation, could operate the airport infrastructure and retain the revenues from commercial activities; (iii) airports managed under a partial concession, in which case the airport manager retained all revenues resulting from the use of passenger and freight terminals and main airport services (e.g. handling), while the State through ENAC retained all revenue from airport charges (landing and departure fees, aircraft parking fees and passenger embarking fees); (iv) airports managed under a comprehensive concession, in which case the airport manager was responsible for the management of all infrastructure (including airside) and the provision of all airport services and collected all revenues derived from airport operations for a duration of up to forty years.
Komisija je 20. decembra 2013 ter 17., 24. in 31. januarja 2014 prejela pripombe družbe Ryanair.
As of 2007 ENAC may provisionally entrust holders of partial concessions (including those only temporarily entrusted with the management of the infrastructure) with the management of the airport under a comprehensive management regime, by limiting the right to use revenues from user rights to the urgent measures required for the airport manager to perform its activity, as laid down in an action plan (Piano di interventi).
Vse predložitve, ki so se nanašale na letališče Alghero, je Italiji posredovala 9. januarja 2014 in 5. februarja 2014.
The Inter-Ministerial Decree 125 T for the award of the concession to So.Ge.A.AL was issued on 3 August 2007.
Italija je 24. februarja 2014 zaprosila za prevod pripomb družbe Ryanair, ki jih je prejela z dopisom Komisije z dne 5. februarja 2014, v italijanski jezik.
In that respect, the Commission recalls that the Court has held that activities that normally fall under the responsibility of the State in the exercise of its official powers as a public authority are not of an economic nature and in general do not fall within the scope of the rules on State aid.
Komisija je Italiji pripombe družbe Ryanair v italijanskem jeziku, kot je zanje zaprosila, posredovala z dopisom z dne 8. aprila 2014.