natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The granting date of the aid would be the date when the additional tax would have been due.
oprostitev davka od dohodkov za obračunane in še ne plačane obresti do datuma začetka obratovanja pomola III;
Exemption from stamp duties on the loan agreements and any ancillary agreement for the funding of the work
pravica do vračila DDV iz dobropisa ne glede na fazo zaključenosti predmeta pogodbe; predelitev pojma „investicijsko blago“ za namene pravil o DDV; pravica do zamudnih obresti od prvega dne po 60 dneh vložitve zahtevka za vračilo DDV;
The Greek authorities should indicate whether PCT has contracted other loan agreements than the ones mentioned with Cosco.
prenos izgube brez časovne omejitve;
As regards these agreements, the aid granted to PCT would be equal to the corresponding stamp duties applicable for these loans.
izbira med tremi amortizacijskimi metodami v zvezi s stroški naložb za prenovo pomola II in gradnjo pomola III;
The dates of granting the aid amounts would be the dates when these stamp duties were due.
oprostitev kolkovin na posojilne pogodbe in kateri koli pomožni sporazum o financiranju projekta;
Exemption in favour of PCT's creditors from taxes, stamp duties, contributions and any rights in favour of the State or third parties that they would normally have to pay on contracts transferring the obligations and rights resulting from PCT's loan agreements
oprostitev davkov, kolkovin in prispevkov ter vseh pravic v korist države ali tretjih strani v zvezi s pogodbami med upniki iz posojilnih pogodb, na podlagi katerih se prenesejo obveznosti in pravice, ki iz njih izhajajo;
This measure involves aid to PCT's creditors, in particular Cosco which is equal to the amount of stamp duty that Cosco would normally have to pay, under the generally applicable rules, in case of transfer of a loan contracted with PCT to a third party.
oprostitev kolkovin za vsako nadomestilo, ki ga podjetje PPA izplača podjetju PCT na podlagi koncesijske pogodbe, ki ne spada na področje Zakona o DDV;
According to the Greek authorities, Cosco has given two loans to PCT in 2009 which were paid out in 2011.
zaščita v okviru posebnega zaščitnega režima za tuje naložbe.
On this basis, the Commission has no reason to believe that such a transfer took place.
Grški organi niso izvzeli podjetja PCT od pravil o prisilni razlastitvi, zato mu glede tega niso odobrili nobene pomoči.
The Greek authorities should clarify if this provision has been used.
Noben od navedenih ukrepov pomoči ni združljiv s Pogodbo in se bo moral vrniti –
If it is the case then they will have to determine the stamp duty that would be due for such legal acts.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Exemption from stamp duties for any compensation paid by PPA to PCT under the Concession contract, which is outside the scope of the VAT code
Člen 1
This measure provides to PCT an advantage which is equal to the stamp duty that it would have to pay in such circumstances and from which it is relieved.
Naslednji ukrepi državne pomoči v korist podjetja Piraeus Container Terminal S.A. in njegovega upnika, podjetja Cosco, ki jih je Grčija nezakonito izvajala in s tem kršila člen 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, niso združljivi z notranjim trgom:
The Greek authorities should indicate if this provision has been used.
zaščita v okviru posebnega zaščitnega režima za tuje naložbe
If it has been used then they will have to identify the aid amounts granted to PCT and their corresponding granting dates in the same way as described for the measures above.
Člen 2
Following PCT's request, preferential regime for foreign investments
Grški organi niso dodelili državne pomoči z izvzetjem podjetja Piraeus Container Terminal S.A. od pravil o prisilni razlastitvi.
The Greek authorities have indicated that this regime has not been used.
Člen 3
Nevertheless, as mentioned in recital 220, PCT has a right to request and to obtain this preferential regime.
Grčija od podjetja PCT in njegovega nadrejenega podjetja Cosco zahteva vračilo nezdružljive dodeljene pomoči iz člena 1.
Timing action
Znesku, ki ga je treba vrniti, se prištejejo obresti za obdobje od datuma, ko je bila pomoč dana na voljo upravičencu, do datuma njenega dejanskega vračila.
Within two months following the notification of this Decision to the Republic of Greece, Greece must inform the Commission of the measures planned or taken:
Obresti se izračunajo z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004 in Uredbo (ES) št. 271/2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004.
i. indication of the measures that indeed may fall under the de minimis regulation and submission of the relevant documentation proving this;
Grčija ukine vse določbe, ki omogočajo nadaljevanje ukrepov iz člena 1 z učinkom od datuma sprejetja tega sklepa.
indication of the measures that have been recovered or of the recovery planning put in place.
Grčija prekliče vsa neizvedena izplačila pomoči iz člena 1 z učinkom od datuma sprejetja tega sklepa.
Within four months following the notification of this Decision to the Republic of Greece, Greece must inform the Commission that it has implemented the recovery.
Člen 4
In principle this will be the final deadline for recovery.
Dodeljena pomoč iz člena 1 se vrne takoj in učinkovito.
In the cases where PCT received an advantage not exceeding thresholds specified in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1407/2013 [194], such advantage is not considered State aid if all the conditions set by this Regulation are fulfilled, and is not subject to recovery.
Grčija zagotavlja, da bo ta sklep izveden v štirih mesecih po tem, ko je o njem obveščena.
The sums to be recovered should bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of PCT until their actual recovery.
Člen 5
The interest should be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [195] and to Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 [196] amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Grčija v dveh mesecih po tem, ko je obveščena o tem sklepu, predloži naslednje informacije:
CONCLUSION
skupni znesek (glavnico in obresti pri vračilu), ki ga vrneta podjetje PCT in njegovo nadrejeno podjetje Cosco;
The Commission finds that Greece has unlawfully implemented the following aid measures in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union:
podroben opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s tem sklepom;
Exemption from income tax on interest accrued until the date of the commencement of operation of Pier III;
dokazila, da sta podjetje PCT in njegovo nadrejeno podjetje Cosco prejela zahtevek za vračilo pomoči.
Right to VAT credit refund irrespective of the stage of completion of the contract object; definition of the notion of ‘investment good’ for the purposes of VAT rules; right to arrear interests from the first day following the 60th day after the VAT refund request;
Grčija obvešča Komisijo o napredku nacionalnih ukrepov, sprejetih za izvajanje tega sklepa, dokler se dodeljena pomoč iz člena 1 ne vrne v celoti.
Loss carry-forward without any temporal limitation;
Na zahtevo Komisije takoj predloži vse informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s tem sklepom.
Choice among three depreciation methods concerning the investment costs of the reconstruction of Pier II and the construction of Pier III;
Prav tako predloži podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih pri vračilu, ki jih je upravičenec že vrnil.
Exemption from stamp duties on the loan agreements and any ancillary agreement for the funding of the project;
Člen 6
Exemption from taxes, stamp duties, contributions and any rights in favour of the State or third parties on the contracts between the creditors of the loan agreements under which are transferred the obligations and rights resulting therefrom;
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Grčijo.
Exemption from stamp duties for any compensation paid by PPA to PCT under the Concession contract, which is outside the scope of the VAT code;
V Bruslju, 23. marca 2015
Protection under the special protective regime for foreign investments.
Za Komisijo
The Greek authorities did not exempt PCT from rules concerning forced expropriation and therefore they granted no aid to PCT in this context.
Članica Komisije
All the aid measures identified above are incompatible with the Treaty and will have to be recovered,
UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Evidentirano pri Komisiji dne 13. maja 2009.
Article 1
Evidentirano pri Komisiji isti dan.
The following State aid measures in favour of Piraeus Container Terminal SA and its creditor, Cosco, unlawfully put into effect by Greece in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, are incompatible with the internal market:
Sklep Komisije z dne 11. julija 2012 C(2012) 4217 final v zadevi SA.
Protection under the special protective regime for foreign investments
28876 (C (12/C) (ex CP 202/09) – Grčija – Container Terminal Port of Piraeus & Cosco Pacific Limited (UL C 301, 5.10.2012, str. 55).
Article 2
Glej opombo 4.
The Greek authorities did not grant State aid by exempting Piraeus Container Terminal SA from rules concerning forced expropriation.
Glej člen 1.1 koncesijskega sporazuma, ki ureja njegovo področje uporabe, in oddelek 3 o pravici do uporabe in izkoriščanja.
Article 3
Glej člen 3.1.iii koncesijskega sporazuma.
Greece shall recover the incompatible aid granted referred to in Article 1 from PCT and its parent company Cosco.
Objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiary until their actual recovery.
Sklic 2008/S 20-026332 z dne 30. januarja 2008, kakor je bil spremenjen s sklicem 2008/S 54-072476 z dne 18. marca 2008 o podaljšanju roka za oddajo ponudb na 19. maj 2008.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 and to Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
oprostitev davka od dohodkov javnih oseb za blago, gradnje in storitve, ki jih podjetja ali skupna podjetja s sedežem zunaj Grčije zagotavljajo podjetju PCT zunaj Grčije, če obstaja dvostranski fiskalni sporazum o izogibanju dvojnega obdavčevanja med Grčijo in državo, v kateri je podjetje registrirano, (ii) vračilo DDV v 60 dneh od datuma vložitve ustreznega zahtevka in obrestna mera, ki se uporablja pri izračunu obresti, če država v 60 dneh od vložitve ustreznega zahtevka ne povrne DDV iz dobropisa.
Greece shall abolish all provisions that allow the continuation of the measures referred to in Article 1 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Člen 2(1) Zakona.
Greece shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 1 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Člen 2(3) in člen (4) Zakona.
Article 4
Člen 2(5) Zakona.
Recovery of the aid granted referred to in Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Člen 2(6) Zakona.
Greece shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
Člen 2(8) Zakona.
Article 5
Člen 2(9) Zakona.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Greece shall submit the following information:
Člen 2(10) Zakona.
the total amount (principal and recovery interest) to be recovered from PCT and its parent company Cosco;
Člen 3 Zakona.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
Zadeva T-157/01, Danske Busvognmaend proti Komisiji, Recueil 2004, str.
documents demonstrating that PCT and its parent company Cosco have been ordered to repay the aid.
I–917.
Greece shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid granted referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
dolgoročnost pogodb, (ii) potreba po zelo pomembni vnaprejšnji naložbi, ki v začetnem obdobju ustvarja zmanjšane prihodke ali jih sploh ne, (iii) potreba po zavarovanju zunanjih finančnih sredstev, (iv) negotovost glede finančne donosnosti, (v) splošni javni interes za ustvarjanje nove javne infrastrukture, (vi) močan in javni interes za uspešen in donosen zaključek projekta.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Uredba (EU) št. 670/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2012 o spremembi Sklepa št. 1639/2006/ES o ustanovitvi okvirnega programa za konkurenčnost in inovativnost (2007–2013) ter Uredbe (ES) št. 680/2007 o določitvi splošnih pravil za dodelitev finančne pomoči Skupnosti na področju vseevropskih prometnih in energetskih omrežij (UL L 204, 31.7.2012, str. 1), ter Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1370/2007z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o javnih storitvah železniškega in cestnega potniškega prometa in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 1191/69 in 1107/70 (UL L 315, 3.12.2007, str. 1).
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
Navajajo zlasti, da Uredba (ES) št. 1370/2007 o obveznostih javne službe priznava, da če je to utemeljeno s potrebo, da se zagotovi davčna ugodnost ali polna amortizacija kapitala v zvezi z izjemno naložbo v infrastrukturo, železniški vozni park ali vozila, lahko pogodba o izvajanju javne službe traja dlje, kot je običajno dovoljeno.
Article 6
Združeni zadevi C-106/09 P in C-107/09 P, Komisija (C-106/09) in Kraljevina Španija (C-107/09 P) proti vladi Gibraltarja, Združenemu kraljestvu Velika Britanija in Severna Iskra, ZOdl.
This Decision is addressed to Greece.
2011, točke 90–92.
Done at Brussels, 23 March 2015.
Uvodna izjava 115 sklepa Komisije o začetku postopka.
For the Commission
Zadeva C-88/03, Portugalska proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Member of the Commission
2006, str.
OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1.
I-7115, točka 81.
Registered by the Commission on 13 May 2009.
Zadeva C-143/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline, Recueil 2001, str.
Registered by the Commission the same day.
I-8384.
Commission decision of 11 July 2012 C(2012) 4217 final, in Case SA.
Zadeva C-169/08, Presidente del Consiglio del Ministri proti Regione Sardegna, ZOdl.
28876 (C (12/C) (ex CP 202/09) — Greece — Container Terminal Port of Piraeus & Cosco Pacific Limited (OJ C 301, 5.10.2012, p. 55).
2009, str.
See footnote 4.
I-10821.
See Article 1.1 of the concession agreement concerning its scope, and Section 3 on the right of use and exploitation.
Zadeva T-210/02 RENV, British Aggregates Association proti Evropski komisiji, ZOdl.
See Article 3.1(iii) of the concession agreement.
2012.
Published in the Official Journal.
Glej na primer analizo Splošnega sodišča v zvezi z zadevo T-210/02 RENV, British Aggregates Association proti Evropski komisiji, ZOdl.
Reference 2008/S 20-026332 from 30 January 2008, amended with Reference 2008/S 54-072476 from 18 March 2008, extending the deadline for submission of tenders until 19 May 2008.
2012, točke 83–91.
Exemption from corporate income tax for goods, works and services provided to PCT outside Greece by companies or joint ventures installed outside Greece, on the condition that there is a bilateral fiscal agreement of avoidance of double taxation between Greece and the countries of registration; (ii) refund of VAT within a period of 60 days from the period of the submission of the relevant application and interest rate applicable for computation of interests in case the State does not refund VAT credit within 60 days from the submission of the relevant application.
Združeni zadevi T-304/04 in T-316/04, Italija in WAM SpA proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Article 2(1) of the Law.
2006, str.
Article 2(3) and (4) of the Law.
II-64.
Article 2(5) of the Law.
Zadeve COMP/M.5398 – HUTCHINSON/EVERGREEN, COMP/M.5450 – KUHNE/HGV/TIU/HAPAG-LLOYD, COMP/JV.55 – HUTCHINSON/RCPM/ECT, COMP/JV.56 – HUTCHINSON/ECT, COMP/M.3863 – TUI/CP SHIPS, COMP/M.5398 – HUTCHINSON/EVERGREEN, COMP/M.3576 – ECT/PONL/EUROMAX, COMP/M.3973 – CMA CGM/DELMAS, COMP/M.3829 MAERRSK/PONL, COMP/M.1674 – MAERSK/ECT, IV/M.831 – P&O/ROYAL NEDLLOYD.
Article 2(6) of the Law.
Zadeva 409/V/2009, Sklep z dne 23. januarja 2009, str. 22.
Article 2(8) of the Law.
Solunsko pristanišče, pristanišče Konstanca v Romuniji, koprsko pristanišče v Sloveniji in nekatera pristanišča v Italiji (primerjaj opombo 173 sklepa o začetku postopka).
Article 2(9) of the Law.
Sklep Komisije z dne 18. decembra 2009 o zadevi C 21/09 (ex N 105/08, N 168/08 in N 169/08) – Grčija – Javno financiranje infrastrukture in opreme v pristanišču Pirej (UL C 402, 29.12.2012, str. 25).
Article 2(10) of the Law.
Zaradi: oddaljenosti Pireja od teh območij; pomanjkanja sodobne železniške povezave in storitev; dodatnih visokih stroškov, ki bi nastali; in ureditev glavnih globokomorskih kontejnerskih ladijskih linij, ki oskrbujejo območje osrednjega Sredozemlja prek pristaniških kontejnerskih terminalov na Malti (npr. Maersk), v Tarantu (npr. Evergreen), v Benetkah (npr. MSC) in v Gioi Tauro (npr. MSC).
Article 3 of the Law.
V Kopru je morje na primer globoko približno 9 metrov, medtem ko je v Pireju globoko 15–19 metrov (to pristanišče za ladje, ki jih oskrbuje, običajno potrebuje globino, ki precej presega 12 metrov).
Case T-157/01, Danske Busvogmaend v Commission [2004] ECR I-917.
V pristanišču Pirej vsak teden pristanejo kontejnerske ladje kapacitete 13500 TEU, ki jih nobeno od teh pristanišč ne more oskrbeti.
Long-term nature of the contracts; (ii) need for very significant upfront investment, which practice means reduced or no revenue during the initial period; (iii) need to secure external funding; (iv) uncertain nature of financial returns; (v) general public interest in the creation of new public infrastructure; (vi) strong and public interest in the successful and profitable completion of the project.
Zaradi dodatnih visokih stroškov prevoza pretovorjenih kontejnerjev v katero koli drugo pristanišče, bi bila ta pristanišča za promet te vrste nezanimiva.
Regulation (EU) No 670/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2012 amending both Decision No 1639/2006/EC establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) and Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport and energy networks (OJ L 204, 31.7.2012, p. 1) and Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 1).
Za običajno globokomorsko plovilo dvosmerna oddaljenost Pireja od te ladijske linije samo približno predstavlja 16-urno plovbo v primerjavi s 44-urno plovbo do solunskega pristanišča, 120-urno plovbo do koprskega pristanišča in nekaj dnevno plovbo do pristanišča Konstanca (zaradi potrebe po plovbi prek Dardanel in Bosporja in tamkajšnjih prometnih zastojev).
In particular they mention that the PSO Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 recognises that were justified by the need to ensure the tax benefit or full capital amortisation in relation to exceptional infrastructure, rolling stock or vehicular investment, a public service contract may have a longer duration than is normally allowed.
V skladu z uvodno izjavo 117 sklepa Komisije: „Edina pristanišča EU, ki spadajo na trg vzhodnega Sredozemskega morja, so tista, ki se nahajajo ob Črnem morju (kot Konstanca v Romuniji in Varna v Bolgariji).
Joined cases C-106/09 P and C-107/09 P, Commission (C-106/09) and Kingdom of Spain (C-107/09 P) v Government of Gibraltar and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:732, paragraphs 90-92.
Vendar zaradi posebnih razmer v ožinah, ki povezujejo Črno morje z Egejskim morjem, pristanišča ob Črnem morju niso glavni konkurenti pristanišča Pirej.
Recital 115 of the opening Commission decision.
Podobno, čeprav ni mogoče povsem izključiti, da druga pristanišča EU, kot so jadranska pristanišča v Italiji in Sloveniji, prav tako lahko konkurirajo pristanišču Pirej, konkurenca med njimi in pristaniščem Pirej ni pomembna“.
Case C-88/03, Portugal v Commission, [2006] ECR I-7115, paragraph 81.
Odstavka 114 in 115 sklepa Komisije v zvezi z zadevo C 21/2009, navedeno v opombi 4.
Case C-143/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline, [2001] ECR I-8384.
njegova lokacija v središču največjega grškega urbanega območja z več kot 5 milijonov prebivalcev, največjega industrijskega/komercialnega območja z najboljšimi železniškimi in cestnimi povezavami v državi, (ii) obsežen prostor za pristajanje, skladiščni prostori in veliko sidrišče, (iii) najgloblje morje, (iv) najmanjša oddaljenost od osi Suez/Gibraltar, (v) eden najkonkurenčnejših trgov goriva za ladje na svetu, (vi) velike objekte in naprave za popravilo ladij in širok nabor storitev, ki jih zahtevajo upravljavci ladij.
Case C-169/08, Presidente del Consiglio del Ministri v Regione Sardegna, [2009] ECR I-10821.
Sklepi Komisije v zadevah N 508/07, Ionia Odos, N 45/2008, Avtocesta Elefsina-Korint-Patras-Pirgos-Tsakona, N 566/07, Avtocesta Korint-Tripoli-Kalamata in odcep Lefktro-Sparti, N 565/07, Avtocesta v osrednji Grčiji, N 633/07, Odsek Maliakos-Kleidi iz koncesijske pogodbe o avtocesti Patras-Atene-Solun-Evzona, N 134/07, Koncesijska pogodba o predoru pod morskim dnom v Solunu, N 462/99, Attiki Odos, NN 143/97, Avtocestni most Rio Antirrio, NN 27/96, Mednarodno letališče Spata.
Case T-210/02 RENV, British Aggregates Association v European Commission, [2012].
Sklep Komisije v zadevi NN 27/96, mednarodno letališče Spata.
See for example the General Court's analysis in this respect in Case T-210/02 RENV, British Aggregates Association v European Commission, [2012], paragraphs 83-91.
Sklep Komisije v zadevah N 462/99, Attiki Odos, in NN 143/97, Avtocestni most Rio Antirrio.
Joined cases T-304/04 and T-316/04, Italy and WAM SpA v Commission, [2006] ECR II-64.
Združeni zadevi T-427/04, Francija proti Komisiji, in T-17/05, France Telecom proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Cases COMP/M.5398 — Hutchinson/Evergreen, COMP/M.5450 — Kuhne/HGV/TIU/Hapag-Lloyd, COMP/JV.55 — Hutchinson/RCPM/ECT, COMP/JV.56 — Hutchinson/ECT, COMP/M.3863 — TUI/CP Ships, COMP/M.5398 — Hutchinson/Evergreen, COMP/M.3576 — ECT/PONL/Euromax, COMP/M.3973 — CMA CGM/Delmas, COMP/M.3829 Maersk/PONL, COMP/M.1674 — Maersk/ECT, IV/M.831 — P&O/Royal Nedlloyd.
2009, str.
Case 409/V/2009, Decision of 23 January 2009, p.
II-0435, točke 264–266, in zadeve C-474-09 P do c-476/09 P, Territorio Historico de Vizcaya, ECLI:EU:C:2011:522, točka 70.
22.
Glej uvodno izjavo 221 sklepa o začetku postopka.
Port of Thessaloniki, port of Constanza in Romania, port of Koper in Slovenia and a number of ports in Italy (cf. footnote 173 of the opening decision).
Iz istega razloga je Komisija odobrila shemo o širokopasovni infrastrukturi na podeželju (SA.
Commission decision of 18 December 2009 on Case C 21/09 (ex N 105/08, N 168/08 and N 169/08) — Greece — Public financing of infrastructure and equipment at the Port of Piraeus (OJ C 402, 29.12.2012, p. 25).
32866 (11/N), katere pravna podlaga je Zakon št. 3389/2005 o javno-zasebnih partnerstvih, ki vsebuje davčne določbe, podobne tistim iz Zakona št. 3755/2009.
Due to: the distance of Piraeus from these areas; the lack of modern railway link and services; the additional significant cost which would be involved; and the arrangements of the major deep-sea container shipping lines which serve the central Mediterranean area through container port terminals in Malta (e.g. Maersk), Taranto (e.g. Evergreen), Venice (e.g. MSC) and Gioia Tauro (e.g. MSC)
Glej uvodni izjavi 225 in 226 sklepa o začetku postopka.
For example Koper offers a sea depth of approximately 9 metres as opposed to 15-19 metres offered by Piraeus (which normally requires well above 12 metres for the ships it services).
Leta 2012 (a) se je promet na pomolu II povečal za 76,5 % v primerjavi z letom 2011 (2,108 milijona TEU leta 2012 v primerjavi z 1,188 milijona TEU leta 2011), (b) zmogljivost je bila za 700000 TEU večja od predvidene v koncesijski pogodbi, (c) prihodki so se povečali za 43 % v primerjavi z letom 2011 (z 72,87 milijona EUR na 104,3 milijona EUR).