natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘This Agreement is rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to establish and to operate routes between:
Ta metoda vključuje izračun dodatnega dobička, pričakovanega za zadnje leto izvajanja pogodbe o letaliških storitvah, in njegovo napoved za prihodnje obdobje, enako obdobju trajanja pogodbe o letaliških storitvah, pri čemer se ta napoved prilagodi s stopnjo rasti trga letalskega prevoza v Evropi in faktorjem verjetnosti, ki naj bi izražal sposobnost pogodbe o letaliških storitvah in pogodbe o storitvah trženja, da prispevata k dobičkom letališča tudi po njunem izteku.
PAU and LONDON Stansted from 30 March 2010 with three flights per week during the whole year …
Glede na študijo z dne 31. januarja 2014 je ta sposobnost ustvariti trajne koristi odvisna od različnih dejavnikov, „[…] vključno z večjo vidnostjo, močnejšo blagovno znamko, zunanjimi učinki omrežja in večkratnimi potniki“, čeprav v študiji ni podrobnosti o teh dejavnikih.
PAU and CHARLEROI from 30 March 2010 with three flights per week for summer schedule …
Poleg tega ta metoda upošteva diskontno stopnjo, ki izraža stroške kapitala.
PAU and BEAUVAIS, from April 2010, with three flights per week for summer schedule …
V študiji je predlagan […]-odstotni faktor verjetnosti, ki naj bi bil razumen.
CCIPB therefore, has the potential to advertise the business and tourist attractions of PAU and its region to large numbers of tourists and business travellers accessing www.ryanair.com, and to attract an increased number of inbound passengers with high spending ability’.
Vendar ta zelo teoretična študija ne zagotavlja nobenih resnih dokazov, ki bi kvantitativno ali kvalitativno utemeljili ta faktor.
‘… [Airport Marketing Services] is the only company that has the potential to target large numbers of potential Ryanair passengers in order to promote the tourist and business attractions in the region’.
Te […]-odstotne stopnje ne utemelji na dejstvih, povezanih z dejavnostmi družbe Ryanair, trgi letalskega prevoza ali letališkimi storitvami.
Furthermore, like the 2005 marketing services agreement, the 2010 agreement stipulates that the services to be provided by AMS consist in inserting messages and links on the Pau destination page of the Ryanair website, and inserting a link to the website designated by the CCIPB (i) on the English homepage of the Ryanair website for the route to London, (ii) on the Belgian and Dutch homepage of the Ryanair website for the route to Charleroi, and (iii) on the French homepage of the Ryanair website for the route to Beauvais.
Ne vzpostavlja nobene povezave med to stopnjo in dejavniki, ki jih na kratko omenja (vidnost, močna blagovna znamka, zunanji učinki omrežja in večkratni potniki) in ki naj bi podaljšali trajanje koristi pogodb o letaliških storitvah in storitvah trženja, da bi se nadaljevale tudi po izteku teh pogodb.
Lastly, the agreement stipulates that, if Ryanair’s air transport services to London, Charleroi and Beauvais, as defined in Article 1, are not announced or launched by February 2010, the agreement will lapse without liability to either party.
Nazadnje se pri analizi, do kakšne mere lahko te storitve vplivajo na navedene dejavnike, nikakor ne opira na posebno vsebino storitev trženja, določeno v različnih pogodbah z družbo AMS.
This provision therefore establishes an additional link between the marketing services agreement and the Ryanair services to London, Charleroi and Beauvais.
Poleg tega ne dokazuje, da obstaja verjetnost, da se bodo po izteku pogodbe o letaliških storitvah in pogodbe o storitvah trženja dobički upravljavca letališča, ustvarjeni s tema pogodbama v zadnjem letu njunega izvajanja, nadaljevali v prihodnosti.
These elements of the various marketing services agreements show that the marketing services stipulated in these agreements are, in terms of both their duration and their nature, closely linked to the air transport services offered by Ryanair, as defined in the marketing services agreements and covered by the corresponding airport services agreements.
Prav tako ne dokazuje, da je stopnja rasti trga letalskega prevoza v Evropi uporaben kazalnik za merjenje učinkov pogodbe o letaliških storitvah in pogodbe o storitvah trženja za določeno letališče.
The marketing services agreements even indicate that they are rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to operate the transport services in question.
Zato je zelo malo verjetno, da bi preudaren udeleženec v tržnem gospodarstvu pri oceni vrednosti sklenitve pogodbe upošteval „končno vrednost“, izračunano po metodi, ki jo je predlagala družba Ryanair.
Far from being designed to generally and equally increase travel to Pau and its region by tourists and business travellers, the marketing services specifically target those persons likely to use the Ryanair transport services covered by the marketing services agreements, and therefore have the primary objective of promoting those services.
Študija z dne 31. januarja 2014 torej kaže, da bi pristop, ki temelji na denarnem toku, tako kot metoda kapitalizacije prinesel zgolj zelo netočne in nezanesljive rezultate.
The marketing services agreements are therefore indissociable from the airport services agreements that they echo and from the air transport services that form their purpose.
Poleg tega niti Francija niti zainteresirane tretje strani niso predložile dokazov, da so regionalni upravljavci letališč, primerljivi z upravljavcem letališča Pau, uspešno uporabili metodo, ki jo je družba Ryanair predlagala v tej študiji, ali katero koli drugo metodo, ki bi upoštevala in količinsko opredelila koristi, nastale po izteku pogodb o letaliških storitvah in pogodb o storitvah trženja.
The facts presented in recitals 286 to 305 also indicate that, in the absence of the routes in question (and therefore the associated airport services agreements), the marketing services agreements would not have been signed.
Francija ni predložila pripomb glede študij z dne 17. in 31. januarja 2014, torej ni potrdila njunih ugotovitev.
As shown in recitals 286 to 305, the marketing services agreements explicitly indicate that they are rooted in Ryanair’s commitment to operate certain routes.
Poleg tega, kot je navedeno zgoraj, so storitve trženja, obravnavane v formalnem postopku preiskave, očitno usmerjene na ljudi, ki bodo verjetno potovali na rutah, zajetih v pogodbah o storitvah trženja.
They also provide for marketing services that are essentially intended to promote those routes.
Če se opravljanje letov na teh rutah po izteku pogodbe o letaliških storitvah ne podaljša, ni verjetno, da bodo storitve trženja še naprej pozitivno vplivale na potniški promet na letališču po datumu izteka.
In this respect, the CCIPB’s argument that these two types of agreement should be analysed separately because they each have a different purpose is without merit.
Upravljavec letališča zelo težko oceni verjetnost, da bo letalski prevoznik še naprej opravljal lete na ruti po koncu obdobja, za katerega se je zavezal v pogodbi o letaliških storitvah.
Furthermore, it seems that, before signing the marketing services agreements in question, the CCIPB did not organise an invitation to tender open to all companies offering this type of service, nor did it consult various potential providers in order to compare their offers.
Zato se preudaren udeleženec v tržnem gospodarstvu pri sklepanju transakcij, kot so tiste, obravnavane v tem formalnem postopku preiskave, ne bi mogel zanašati na pripravljenost letalskega prevoznika, da po izteku pogodbe podaljša opravljanje letov na zadevni ruti.
This confirms the close link of dependency between the marketing services agreements and the routes operated by Ryanair from Pau.
Ta metoda vključuje izračun dodatnega dobička, pričakovanega za zadnje leto izvajanja pogodbe o letaliških storitvah, in njegovo napoved za prihodnost z uporabo dveh dejavnikov.
If the marketing services agreements had been truly independent of the airport services agreements, the CCIPB would in all likelihood have consulted other providers in addition to AMS, particularly as it is a public body that routinely uses competitive procurement procedures.
Prvi dejavnik je splošna rast na evropskem trgu letalskega prevoza, ki izraža pričakovano rast prometa.
Moreover, it also seems that the signature of all the airport services agreements was dependent upon the signature of the marketing services agreements.
Drugi dejavnik je […]-odstotna stopnja, ki v bistvu pomeni verjetnost, da bodo pogodbe, ki se bodo kmalu iztekle, spodbudile sklenitev podobnih pogodb v prihodnosti, ki bodo ustvarile podobne finančne tokove.
Firstly, according to France, the 2005 agreements (airport services agreement and marketing services agreement of 30 June 2005), although legally independent, were, however, closely linked, and the close link between the airport services agreement signed with Ryanair and the marketing services agreement signed with AMS, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ryanair, cannot be denied.
Zato bo v primeru negativnega prihodnjega dodatnega dobička, ki se pričakuje za zadnje leto izvajanja pogodbe o letaliških storitvah, negativna (ali enaka nič) tudi končna vrednost, kar kaže, da sklenitev pogodb, podobnih pogodbam, ki se bodo kmalu iztekle, prav tako vsako leto zmanjša donosnost letališča.
Given the significant similarities between the 2005 agreements and the agreements signed subsequently with Ryanair and AMS, France’s aforementioned comments can be easily applied to these subsequent agreements.
Študija z dne 31. januarja 2014 zelo na kratko obravnava ta primer, in sicer v opombi brez kakršnih koli pripomb ali pojasnil preprosto navaja, da „[…] končne vrednosti ni mogoče izračunati, če so neto dodatni dobički na podlagi plačil družbi AMS v zadnjem letu obravnavanega obdobja negativni“.
France also indicates in its letter of 30 May 2011 that the CCIPB was induced to sign the agreements on 30 June 2005.
Vendar, kot bo dokazano v nadaljevanju, vse pogodbe v tem primeru vključujejo napovedane dodatne tokove, ki imajo vsako leto negativno neto sedanjo vrednost in ne samo skupno.
It further points out in this letter that, following the non-renewal of the AMS agreement, Ryanair decided, without sending written notice to the CCIPB, not to renew its flights to Pau-Pyrénées airport as from the IATA 2011 summer season (April 2011).
Zato bi bila „končna vrednost“, izračunana po metodi, ki jo je predlagala družba Ryanair, za te pogodbe enaka nič ali celo negativna.
This tends to indicate that, at least in certain cases, Ryanair would not agree to operate a route and pay the airport’s general charges without a marketing services agreement signed between the airport operator and AMS.
Upoštevanje te končne vrednosti torej ne bi omajalo ugotovitve, da te različne pogodbe vključujejo gospodarsko prednost.
This approach was also highlighted by the CRC in its report of 5 January 2007.
Iz zgoraj navedenega izhaja, da bi bila edina oprijemljiva korist, ki bi jo preudaren udeleženec v tržnem gospodarstvu pričakoval od pogodbe o storitvah trženja ter jo upošteval in količinsko opredelil pri oceni vrednosti sklenitve take pogodbe skupaj s pogodbo o letaliških storitvah, morebiten pozitiven učinek storitev trženja na število potnikov na letih na rutah, zajetih v zadevnih pogodbah, v obdobju izvajanja letov na teh rutah, kot je določeno v pogodbah.
It is clear from all the above that each marketing services agreement is indissociable from the underlying airport services agreement, forms a single transaction with the latter, and in all likelihood would not have been signed in the absence of the corresponding airport services agreement and the routes covered by these two agreements.
Vse druge koristi bi se štele za preveč negotove, da bi se lahko upoštevale in količinsko opredelile, in nič ne kaže, da jih je zbornica upoštevala.
Consequently, each marketing services agreement and the airport services agreement signed at the same time should be analysed as a single measure in order to determine whether this agreement constitutes State aid.
Pomen primerjave pogojev pogodb o letaliških storitvah, zajetih v formalnem postopku preiskave, z letališkimi pristojbinami, ki se zaračunavajo na drugih letališčih
Application of the MEO test to the CCIPB with regard to the marketing services agreements
Nove smernice določajo, da se pri uporabi preskusa udeleženca v tržnem gospodarstvu pomoč letalskemu prevozniku, ki uporablja letališče, načeloma lahko izključi, če:
In order to apply the MEO test with regard to the marketing services agreements, the hypothetical MEO to be used for analysing the conduct of the CCIPB must be identified.
je s predhodno analizo, tj. na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij in predvidljivega razvoja dogodkov v času dodelitve ukrepa, mogoče dokazati, da bo dogovor letališča/letalskega prevoznika privedel do pozitivnega dodatnega prispevka k dobičku za letališče.
One approach would be to consider that the CCIPB signed the marketing services agreements as the airport operator, and therefore to compare its conduct with that of a hypothetical airport operator motivated by the prospect of profits.
Poleg tega nove smernice določajo: „Pri ocenjevanju dogovorov letališča/letalskih prevoznikov bo Komisija upoštevala tudi, v kakšnem obsegu se lahko ocenjevani dogovori štejejo za del izvajanja splošne strategije letališča, ki pričakovano vodi k donosnosti, vsaj z dolgoročnega vidika“.
Another approach would be to consider that the CCIPB acted as a public body entrusted with a general interest mission, in this case the economic development of Pau and its region, and that it purchased these marketing services in order to fulfil that mission, regardless of its capacity as the operator of Pau airport.
Vendar Komisija v zvezi s prvim pristopom (primerjava s „tržno ceno“) močno dvomi, da se lahko v sedanjosti opredeli ustrezno referenčno merilo za vzpostavitev realne tržne cene za storitve, ki jih ponujajo letališča.
In the context of this second approach, according to the case-law, it needs to be verified, firstly, that the services in question met the ‘actual needs’ of the public purchaser and, secondly, that they were purchased at a price equal to or below a ‘market price’ or, in other words, that an MEO motivated by the prospect of profits and needing equivalent services (without necessarily being an airport operator) would have been prepared to accept similar conditions to those accepted by the CCIPB.
Komisija meni, da je najustreznejše merilo za oceno dogovorov, ki jih letališča sklenejo s posameznimi letalskimi prevozniki, predhodna analiza dodatne donosnosti.
The comments of certain interested third parties tend to favour the second approach, at least implicitly.
V zvezi s tem je treba omeniti, da je lahko uporaba preskusa udeleženca v tržnem gospodarstvu na podlagi povprečne cene, ugotovljene na drugih podobnih trgih, na splošno koristna, če je mogoče tržno ceno razumno opredeliti ali pridobiti na podlagi drugih tržnih kazalnikov.
In particular, notably in its aforementioned study of 20 December 2013, Ryanair has provided information intended to show that the price of the AMS marketing services did not exceed what may be regarded as a market price for such services.
Vendar ta metoda v primeru letaliških storitev morda ni tako pomembna.
Further to this argument, it has noted that airport operators cannot be distinguished from other types of AMS customer.
Prihodki in struktura stroškov se med letališči močno razlikujejo.
The CCIPB has provided information leading in the same direction and has also noted that it is responsible for developing the economic attractiveness of the area falling within its competence.
Ti stroški in prihodki so odvisni od stopnje razvoja letališča, števila letalskih prevoznikov, ki opravljajo lete na letališče/z letališča, razpoložljive zmogljivosti v smislu potniškega prometa, stanja infrastrukture, regulativne obremenitve, ki se lahko med državami članicami razlikuje, ter preteklih dolgov in obveznosti letališča.
Accordingly, it states that the sums paid for these marketing services have enabled the assets of Pau and its region to be promoted, with the EUR 56 000 000 that Ryanair passengers spent in 2010 during their stay having directly benefited the accommodation, catering, trade and property sectors (this amount was apparently EUR 8 000 000 in 2005, which the CCIPB claims was very low compared to the impact studies carried out by other airports).
Poleg tega liberalizacija trga letalskega prevoza otežuje kakršno koli izključno primerjalno analizo.
This statement suggests that, according to the CCIPB, its conduct should be analysed as that of a public purchaser acquiring the services needed to fulfil its general interest missions.
Kot nazorno prikazuje obravnavani primer, poslovni dogovori med letališči in letalskimi prevozniki ne temeljijo nujno na seznamu javnih cen za posamezne storitve.
The Commission notes in this respect, firstly, that this argument contradicts the theory that the decisions of the CCIPB on the measures in question are not imputable to the State.
Ti poslovni odnosi se močno razlikujejo.
If the CCIPB maintains that it signed these agreements to fulfil its local economic development task, then it must necessarily accept that its conduct is typically that of a local public authority.
Vključujejo delitev tveganj v smislu prometa ter z njimi povezanih poslovnih in finančnih odgovornosti, splošno uporabo spodbujevalnih mehanizmov (npr. v obliki popustov, povezanih s številom povezav ali prepeljanih potnikov) in spremembe v porazdelitvi tveganj v obdobju trajanja pogodb.
This approach would essentially mean considering that the CCIPB signed the marketing services agreements without any regard to the routes offered by Ryanair from the airport that it operates, and that it would have signed these agreements even in the absence of the routes in question and the corresponding airport services agreements.
Družba Ryanair v svoji študiji z dne 9. aprila 2013 v bistvu trdi, da se lahko preskus udeleženca v tržnem gospodarstvu uporabi na podlagi primerjave s poslovnimi dogovori drugih evropskih letališč.
For the reasons detailed in recitals 286 to 313, such an assumption is highly unlikely.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da med postopkom niti Francija niti druge zainteresirane tretje strani Komisiji niso predlagale vzorca primerljivih letališč, ki bi se lahko uporabila v tem primeru in so dovolj primerljiva z letališčem Pau v smislu obsega in vrste prometa, vrste in ravni zagotovljenih letaliških storitev, oddaljenosti letališča od velikega mesta, števila prebivalcev v ciljnem območju, blaginje okoliških območij ter različnih geografskih območij, ki bi lahko privabila potnike.
Moreover, even if this second approach were used, it would not lead to the conclusion that the marketing services agreements do not confer an economic advantage on Ryanair and AMS.
Tudi če bi bil tak vzorec letališč na voljo, bi bila primerjalna metoda v tem primeru povsem neuporabna.
In fact, as noted in recital 316, in order for purchases made by a public entity not to confer an economic advantage on the seller, it is not enough for them to have been made at a price equal to or below ‘market price’.
Kot je dokazano zgoraj, so transakcije, ki jih je treba analizirati, zapleteni sklopi, sestavljeni iz pogodbe o letaliških storitvah in pogodbe o storitvah trženja (ki sta včasih združeni v istem pravnem mediju).
They must also meet an ‘actual need’ of the public purchaser.
Te transakcije vključujejo več „cen“, in sicer različne letališke pristojbine, ceno storitev zemeljske oskrbe in ceno storitev trženja, pri čemer so nekatere od teh cen odvisne od števila potnikov ali števila premikov letal, druge pa so fiksne.
It cannot be categorically ruled out that, in fulfilling its economic development mission for Pau and its region, the CCIPB may feel the need to resort to commercial providers in order to promote the area.
Vsaka od teh transakcij torej ustvari zapleten niz finančnih tokov med upravljavcem letališča ter letalskim prevoznikom in njegovimi hčerinskimi družbami, ti tokovi pa vključujejo prihodke od letaliških pristojbin, prihodke, povezane s storitvami zemeljske oskrbe, in prihodke, povezane s storitvami trženja.
However, in the present case, this promotion targets the commercial activities of two clearly defined undertakings, namely Ryanair and the CCIPB itself as the operator of Pau airport.
Zato primerjava med letališkimi pristojbinami, ki jih je zbornica zaračunala zadevnim letalskim prevoznikom, in letališkimi pristojbinami, zaračunanimi na primerljivih letališčih, ne bi zagotovila nobenega uporabnega kazalnika, ki bi pokazal, ali so pogoji preskusa udeleženca v tržnem gospodarstvu izpolnjeni.
A public entity cannot consider that marketing services mainly promoting the activities of one or more clearly defined undertakings form part of this entity’s specific task of promoting local economic development.
Za veljavno primerjavo transakcij, zajetih v tej oceni, bi bilo treba za letališča v primerjalnem vzorcu vsaj opredeliti sklop primerljivih transakcij, ki morajo vključevati predvsem enakovredne storitve trženja in enakovredne storitve zemeljske oskrbe.
It is logical for such a public entity to start from the assumption that local undertakings must carry out or finance their own marketing operations, and that its own actions are limited to the general promotion of the area and local economic fabric, without targeting specific undertakings.
Tak vzorec primerljivih transakcij pa bi bilo nemogoče najti, saj so transakcije, zajete v tej oceni, zelo zapletene in specifične, še toliko bolj pa zaradi dejstva, da so cene storitev zemeljske oskrbe in storitev trženja zelo redko javno objavljene, zato bi jih bilo težko pridobiti in uporabiti kot podlago za primerjavo.
Any other approach would mean considering that a public entity responsible for local economic development could, without such measures constituting State aid, purchase marketing services that mainly promote the products or services of certain locally established undertakings, on the grounds that these services encourage local economic development and that they are purchased at ‘market price’.
Nazadnje, če se domneva, da bi bilo mogoče na podlagi veljavne primerjalne analize ugotoviti, da so bile „cene“, ki so se uporabile v različnih transakcijah, zajetih v tej oceni, enake ali višje od „tržnih cen“, določenih na podlagi vzorca primerljivih transakcij, Komisija ne bi mogla zaključiti, da so bile navedene transakcije v skladu s tržno ceno, če bi se izkazalo, da je upravljavec letališča ob sklenitvi teh transakcij pričakoval, da bodo z njimi povezani dodatni stroški višji od dodatnih prihodkov.
Such an approach would circumvent Article 107(1) TFEU.
Udeleženec v tržnem gospodarstvu blaga ali storitev dejansko ne bi hotel zagotavljati po „tržni ceni“, če bi s tem ustvaril dodatno izgubo.
As a result, it seems that the marketing services purchased by the CCIPB from AMS cannot be regarded as meeting an ‘actual need’ of the CCIPB as a public entity invested with a local economic development mission.
Komisija meni, da je v zvezi s to analizo primerno ponoviti, da so bile Francija in zainteresirane strani po sprejetju novih smernic pozvane, naj predložijo pripombe glede uporabe navedenih smernic v obravnavanem primeru (glej uvodni izjavi 22 in 23).
This conclusion is confirmed by certain information provided by France, according to which, in particular, it is clearly not common practice for CCIs that do not operate an airport to purchase marketing services from airlines.
Niti Francija niti zainteresirane strani niso vsebinsko nasprotovale pristopu Komisije, v skladu s katerim je v primeru, da ni mogoče opredeliti ustreznega referenčnega merila za določitev realne tržne cene za storitve, ki jih letališča zagotavljajo letalskim prevoznikom, najustreznejše merilo za oceno dogovorov, sklenjenih med tema dvema pogodbenicama, predhodna analiza dodatne donosnosti.