natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
From early 2003 onwards, there was an unprecedented increase in demand for transformers, leading to a corresponding increase of demand for the product concerned and rising prices.
Od začetka leta 2003 se je povpraševanje po transformatorjih povečevalo kot še nikoli prej, zaradi česar se je ustrezno povečalo povpraševanje po zadevnem izdelku, cene pa so se dvignile.
This led to a significant added capacity by both transformer and GOES producers worldwide, from 2003/2004 onwards.
To je od obdobja 2003/2004 naprej privedlo do znatne dodane zmogljivosti proizvajalcev transformatorjev in GOES po vsem svetu.
However, with a slight delay, and certainly from the year 2011 onwards, the global (including the Union) market started to experience a significant drop in consumption also hitting the transformer industry.
Vendar se je z rahlo zamudo, zagotovo pa po letu 2011, na svetovnem trgu (vključno s trgom Unije) potrošnja začela znatno zmanjševati, kar je vplivalo tudi na industrijo transformatorjev.
During the period considered, the Union consumption decreased by around 11 %.
Potrošnja Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšala za približno 11 %.
The drop in consumption is mainly due to a decreasing demand from the downstream industry, i.e. the transformer producers.
Razlog za upad potrošnje je predvsem manjše povpraševanje industrije na koncu prodajne verige, tj. proizvajalcev transformatorjev.
The Commission examined whether imports of the product concerned originating in the countries concerned should be assessed cumulatively, in accordance with Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 3(4) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali je treba uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz zadevnih držav oceniti kumulativno.
The margins of dumping established in relation to the imports from the PRC, Japan, Korea, Russia and the USA were all above the de minimis threshold laid down in Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation.
Stopnje dampinga, ugotovljene za uvoz iz LRK, Japonske, Koreje, Rusije in ZDA, so bile vse višje od praga de minimis iz člena 9(3) osnovne uredbe.
The volume of imports from each of the countries concerned was not negligible within the meaning of Article 5(7) of the basic Regulation.
Obseg uvoza iz posamezne zadevne države ni bil zanemarljiv v smislu člena 5(7) osnovne uredbe.
The conditions of competition between the dumped imports from the countries concerned and the like product were also similar.
Tudi konkurenčni pogoji med dampinškim uvozom iz zadevnih držav in podobnim izdelkom so bili podobni.
The imported products competed with each other and with the product concerned produced in the Union because they are sold to similar categories of end customers.
Uvoženi izdelki so konkurirali med seboj in s podobnim izdelkom, proizvedenim v Uniji, ker se prodajajo podobnim kategorijam končnih strank.
Therefore, all the criteria set out in Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation were met and imports from the countries concerned were examined cumulatively for the purposes of the injury determination.
Tako so bila vsa merila iz člena 3(4) osnovne uredbe izpolnjena, uvoz iz zadevnih držav pa je bil ocenjen kumulativno, da bi se določila škoda.
Exporting producers from both the USA and Japan have contested the appropriateness of a cumulative assessment.
Proizvajalci izvozniki iz ZDA in Japonske so izpodbijali ustreznost kumulativne ocene.
They both argued that their imports decreased over the period considered and that they did not undercut the prices of the Union producers.
Vsi so trdili, da se je njihov uvoz v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal in da niso nelojalno nižali prodajnih cen proizvajalcev Unije.
Despite the decrease in imports from Japan and the USA during the period considered, these dumped imports have also contributed to the exerted price pressure for the product concerned on the EU market.
Čeprav se je v obravnavanem obdobju uvoz iz Japonske in ZDA zmanjšal, je ta dampinški uvoz prispeval tudi k izvajanju pritiska na cene zadevnega izdelka na trgu EU.
Their imports are dumped and their products are clearly in direct competition with Union products and products from other exporting producers.
Njihov uvoz je dampinški in njihovi izdelki nedvomno neposredno konkurirajo izdelkom Unije ter izdelkom drugih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The conditions for applying a cumulative assessment of the effects of the imports of the five countries concerned are still met.
Pogoji za uporabo kumulativne ocene učinkov uvoza petih zadevnih držav so še vedno izpolnjeni.
GOES of all types, including the types sold by the Japanese and American exporting producers, are sold for use in the production of transformer cores and they are sold to the same relatively limited group of customers.
Vse vrste GOES, vključno z vrstami, ki jih prodajajo japonski in ameriški proizvajalci izvozniki, se prodajajo za uporabo v proizvodnji jeder transformatorjev, pri čemer se prodajajo isti, razmeroma omejeni skupini strank.
Therefore, the Commission provisionally rejected these arguments.
Zato je Komisija začasno zavrnila te trditve.
The Commission established the volume of imports on the basis of Eurostat and the data submitted by the cooperating producers in the countries concerned.
Komisija je obseg uvoza določila na podlagi podatkov Eurostata in podatkov, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči proizvajalci v zadevnih državah.
The market share of the imports was established on the basis of Eurostat.
Tržni delež uvoza je bil določen na podlagi podatkov Eurostata.
As already mentioned, a large portion of the imports of the Japanese product concerned into the Netherlands were reported under a confidential CN Code during the period considered.
Kot je že navedeno, se je o večjem delu uvoza japonskega zadevnega izdelka na Nizozemsko v obravnavanem obdobju poročalo pod zaupno oznako KN.
For this reason, ranges are provided in the table below concerning the imports from the countries concerned.
Zato so v spodnji preglednici navedeni razponi v zvezi z uvozom iz zadevnih držav.
Source: Eurostat and cooperating exporting producers.
Vir: Eurostat in sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki.
Import volume (metric tonnes) and market share
Obseg uvoza (v metričnih tonah) in tržni delež
Volume of imports from the countries concerned
Obdobje preiskave Obseg uvoza iz zadevnih držav
The above table shows that in absolute figures the imports from the countries concerned decreased slightly during the period considered.
V zgornji preglednici je prikazano, da se je v absolutnih številkah uvoz iz zadevnih držav v obravnavanem obdobju nekoliko zmanjšal.
However, the total market share of the dumped imports into the Union increased by about three percentage points during the period considered.
Vendar se je celoten tržni delež dampinškega uvoza v Unijo v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za približno tri odstotne točke.
The Commission established the prices of imports on the basis of Eurostat data and the data submitted by the cooperating producers in the countries concerned.
Komisija je cene uvoza določila na podlagi podatkov Eurostata in podatkov, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči proizvajalci v zadevnih državah.
Import prices (EUR/metric tonne)
Cene uvoza (v EUR/metrično tono)
Average price of dumped imports (per unit)
Povprečna cena dampinškega uvoza (na enoto)
The average prices of the dumped imports decreased from 1813 EUR/tonne in 2011 to 1263 EUR/tonne during the investigation period.
Povprečne cene dampinškega uvoza so se znižale s 1813 EUR/tono v letu 2011 na 1263 EUR/tono v obdobju preiskave.
The Commission assessed the price undercutting during the investigation period by comparing:
Komisija je nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen v obdobju preiskave ocenila tako, da je primerjala:
the weighted average sales prices per product type of the six Union producers charged to unrelated customers on the Union market, adjusted to an ex-works level; and
tehtane povprečne prodajne cene za posamezno vrsto izdelka proizvajalcev Unije, zaračunane nepovezanim strankam na trgu Unije, prilagojene na raven cene franko tovarna, in
the corresponding weighted average prices per product type of the imports from the cooperating producers of the countries concerned to the first independent customer on the Union market, established on a Cost, insurance, freight (CIF) basis, with appropriate adjustments for post-importation costs.
ustrezno tehtano povprečje cen za posamezne uvožene vrste izdelkov sodelujočih proizvajalcev iz zadevnih držav prvi neodvisni stranki na trgu Unije, določenih na podlagi CIF z ustreznimi prilagoditvami za stroške, nastale po uvozu.
The price comparison was made on a type-by-type basis for transactions at the same level of trade, duly adjusted where necessary, and after deduction of rebates and discounts.
Primerjava cen je bila izvedena za vsako vrsto izdelka posebej za transakcije na isti ravni trgovanja in po morebitni ustrezni prilagoditvi ter odbitku rabatov in popustov.
The result of the comparison was expressed as a percentage of the Union producers' turnover during the investigation period.
Rezultat primerjave je bil izražen kot odstotek prihodkov od prodaje proizvajalcev Unije v obdobju preiskave.
Despite the drop in prices, on average, the exporting producers were not undercutting the Union industry prices.
Čeprav so se cene v povprečju znižale, proizvajalci izvozniki niso nelojalno nižali prodajnih cen industrije Unije.
In general, Union industry prices were quite similar or marginally higher.
Na splošno so bile cene industrije Unije precej podobne ali nekoliko višje.
The result of the comparison showed generally the absence of undercutting.
Rezultat primerjave je pokazal, da na splošno ni bilo nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen.
Only one Japanese exporting producer was found to be undercutting the Union industry prices by 0,50 %.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je le en japonski proizvajalec izvoznik nelojalno nižal prodajne cene industrije za 0,50 %.
The absence of undercutting does not, however, mean that export prices could not have caused injury.
Dejstvo, da ni bilo nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen, pa ne pomeni, da izvozne cene niso mogle povzročiti škode.
Union industry prices were the result of the strong price depression exerted by the low-priced dumped imports.
Cene industrije Unije so bile rezultat pomembnega nižanja cen, ki ga je povzročil dampinški uvoz po nizki ceni.
As a result of the overcapacity on the world market due to the booming business during the years 2003-2010, intense price competition between the Union and exporting producers started during the period considered.
Ker je na svetovnem trgu zaradi skokovito naraščajočega poslovanja v letih 2003–2010 obstajala presežna zmogljivost, se je v obravnavanem obdobju začela intenzivna cenovna konkurenca med proizvajalci Unije in proizvajalci izvozniki.
Aggressive price strategies concerned in particular the Union market and can be sustained longer by the exporting producers than the Union producers for the following reasons: Firstly, the market share of the exporting producers on their domestic markets is much higher than the market share of the Union producers in the Union.
Agresivne cenovne strategije so zadevale zlasti trg Unije, pri čemer jih lahko iz naslednjih razlogov dlje prenašajo proizvajalci izvozniki kot proizvajalci Unije: prvič, tržni delež proizvajalcev izvoznikov na njihovih domačih trgih je veliko večji kot tržni delež proizvajalcev Unije v Uniji.
The Union market is an open market whereas, as mentioned in section 3.3.1 ‘Analogue country’ above, the domestic markets of the exporting producers of the countries concerned cannot be easily penetrated by other competitors, including the Union producers.
Trg Unije je odprti trg, na domače trge proizvajalcev izvoznikov zadevnih držav pa drugi konkurenti, vključno s proizvajalci Unije, ne morejo enostavno vstopiti, kot je navedeno v razdelku 3.3.1 Primerljiva država zgoraj.
Secondly, most exporting producers have high profits on their home markets, which provide them with a comfortable margin to sell at dumped prices, and even at a loss, on the EU market.
Drugič, večina proizvajalcev izvoznikov ima velike dobičke na svojih domačih trgih, ki jim omogočajo ugodno stopnjo za prodajo po dampinških cenah na trgu EU, čeprav z izgubo.
In particular the Japanese and USA exporting producers sell at a loss on the Union market.
Zlasti japonski in ameriški proizvajalci izvozniki na trgu Unije prodajajo z izgubo.
In the period considered, Union producers were loss making on both the EU market and outside the EU.
V obravnavanem obdobju so proizvajalci Unije ustvarjali izgubo na trgu EU in zunaj EU.
In these circumstances, the question whether or not exporting producers sell below the already loss making prices of the Union industry is not decisive.
V teh razmerah vprašanje, ali proizvajalci izvozniki prodajajo pod cenami industrije Unije, ki že ustvarjajo izgube, ni odločilno.
Rather, the crucial factor for the determination of injury is that Union producers had no option but to sell below costs in order to defend their market share and sustain an economical level of production because of the severe price pressure exerted on their sales prices.
Namesto tega je ključni dejavnik za določitev škode, da proizvajalci Unije niso imeli druge možnosti, kot prodajati po cenah, nižjih od stroškov, da bi obdržali svoj tržni delež in ohranili gospodarsko raven proizvodnje, zaradi močnega pritiska na cene, ki se izvaja na njihove prodajne cene.
The Russian exporting producer claimed that an adjustment should be made with respect to quality differences between the product concerned produced and sold by this exporting producer and the like product produced by the Union Industry.
Ruski proizvajalec izvoznik je zahteval prilagoditev zaradi razlik v kakovosti med zadevnim izdelkom, ki ga proizvaja in prodaja proizvajalec izvoznik, in podobnim izdelkom, ki ga proizvaja industrija Unije.
This claim is based on the fact that, for the same type, the quality of the product concerned produced by this exporting producer would be considerably lower than the quality produced by the Union industry.
Trditev utemeljuje s tem, da naj bi bila pri izdelku iste vrste kakovost zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvaja ta proizvajalec izvoznik, znatno nižja od kakovosti izdelka, ki ga proizvaja industrija Unije.
This claim was not substantiated and in fact there was no evidence on file that for the same product type there would be a quality difference between Russian exports and Union production.
Ta trditev ni bila utemeljena in v dokumentaciji dejansko ni bilo dokazov, da bi pri isti vrsti izdelka obstajala razlika v kakovosti izdelkov iz ruskega izvoza in proizvodnje Unije.
The claim was therefore provisionally rejected.
Trditev je bila zato začasno zavrnjena.
However, in respect of fair comparison of product types it was provisionally accepted that Russian ‘second and third choice’ product concerned should not be compared with Union industry ‘first and second choice’ products.
Vendar je bilo glede na pošteno primerjavo vrst izdelka začasno sprejeto, da se ruski zadevni izdelek „druge in tretje kategorije“ ne bi smel primerjati z izdelki „prve in druge kategorije“ industrije Unije.
A further claim concerned the level of trade.
Druga zahteva je bila povezana z ravnjo trgovanja.
It was argued that a difference in level of trade merited an adjustment and that NLMK sells exclusively via a trader, while EU companies also sell directly to final users.
Trdilo se je, da bi razlika v ravni trgovanja zaslužila prilagoditev in da NLMK prodaja izključno prek trgovca, medtem ko družbe EU prodajajo tudi neposredno končnim uporabnikom.
However, this claim was also provisionally rejected as the investigation has not shown that this difference of level of trade had an impact on prices.
Vendar je bila tudi ta zahteva začasno zavrnjena, ker preiskava ni pokazala, da je ta razlika v ravni trgovanja vplivala na cene.
In particular, it was not substantiated that there is a consistent and distinct differences in prices between the above levels of trade.
Utemeljeno ni bilo zlasti, da obstajajo dosledne in očitne razlike v cenah med zgornjima ravnema trgovanja.
In accordance with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the examination of the impact of the dumped imports on the Union industry included an evaluation of all economic indicators having a bearing on the state of the Union industry during the period considered.
V skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe je preiskava učinka dampinškega uvoza na industrijo Unije vključevala oceno vseh gospodarskih dejavnikov, ki so vplivali na stanje industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju.
For the injury determination, the Commission did not make a distinction between macroeconomic and microeconomic injury indicators since all known Union producers constitute the ‘Union industry’ within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Pri določanju škode Komisija ni razlikovala med makroekonomskimi in mikroekonomskimi kazalniki škode, ker vsi znani proizvajalci Unije predstavljajo „industrijo Unije“ v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission evaluated the injury indicators on the basis of data contained in the questionnaire replies from all known Union producers and data collected from the complainant.
Komisija je ocenila kazalnike škode na podlagi podatkov iz vprašalnikov, ki so jih izpolnili vsi znani proizvajalci Unije, in podatkov, ki jih je zbral pritožnik.
The total Union production, production capacity and capacity utilisation developed over the period considered as follows:
Celotna proizvodnja Unije, proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti so se v obravnavanem obdobju gibale na naslednji način:
Source: verified questionnaire replies
Vir: preverjeni izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
Production volume (metric tonnes)
Obseg proizvodnje (v metričnih tonah)
Production capacity (metric tonnes)
Proizvodna zmogljivost (v metričnih tonah)
During the overall period considered, the Union Industry's production volume decreased by 17,2 %.
V celotnem obravnavanem obdobju se je obseg proizvodnje industrije Unije zmanjšal za 17,2 %.
The reported capacity figures refer to technical capacity, which implies that adjustments, considered as standards by the industry, for set-up time, maintenance, bottle necks and other normal stoppages have been taken into consideration.
Sporočeni podatki o zmogljivosti se nanašajo na tehnično zmogljivost, kar pomeni, da so bile prilagoditve za vzpostavitev, vzdrževanje, ozka grla in druge običajne ustavitve, ki jih industrija šteje za standarde, upoštevane.
The capacity slightly increased during the period considered.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je zmogljivost nekoliko povečala.
Some Union producers have been investing during the period considered to modernise their existing production equipment with a view to producing proportionally more high permeability types than conventional types.
Nekateri proizvajalci Unije so v obravnavanem obdobju vlagali v posodobitev obstoječe proizvodne opreme, da bi proizvedli sorazmerno več visokoprepustnih vrst kot konvencionalnih vrst.
This, however, did not affect the production capacity during the period considered.
Vendar to ni vplivalo na zmogljivost proizvodnje v obravnavanem obdobju.
The decrease of the capacity utilisation rate resulted from a slight increase in the production capacity combined with a fall in the production volume.
Zmanjšanje izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti je bilo posledica rahlega porasta proizvodne zmogljivosti, povezanega z zmanjšanjem obsega proizvodnje.
The decrease was 15 percentage points during the period considered.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je zmanjšala za 15 odstotnih točk.
For this reason, ranges are provided in the table below concerning sales volume and market share.
Zato so v spodnji preglednici navedeni razponi v zvezi z obsegom prodaje in tržnim deležem.
The Union industry's sales volume and market share developed over the period considered as follows:
Obseg prodaje in tržni delež industrije Unije sta se v obravnavanem obdobju gibala na naslednji način:
Total sales volume on the Union market (metric tonnes)
Celoten obseg prodaje na trgu Unije (v metričnih tonah)
The Union Industry sales volume on the Union market decreased by 11,4 % during the period considered, from about 189000-204000 tonnes in 2011 to 167000-182000 tonnes during the IP.
Obseg prodaje industrije Unije na trgu Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za 11,4 %, in sicer s približno 189000–204000 ton v letu 2011 na 167000–182000 ton v obdobju preiskave.
This decrease already started before the period considered as in 2010 the Union Industry sales volume was 210693 tonnes.
To zmanjševanje se je začelo že pred obravnavanim obdobjem, saj je bil v letu 2010 obseg prodaje industrije Unije 210693 ton.
During the period considered, the Union Industry's market share slightly decreased from 51,7 %-58,4 % to 51,1 %-57,6 %).
V obdobju preiskave se je tržni delež industrije Unije nekoliko zmanjšal z 51,7 %–58,4 % na 51,1 %–57,6 %.
Again, this decrease already started before the period considered as in 2010 the Union industry still had a market share of 60,6 % This loss of market share coincided in time with the decrease of consumption, but the decrease of Union Industry's sales volume exceeded the decrease of consumption.
Tudi to zmanjševanje se je začelo že pred obravnavanim obdobjem, saj je industrija Unije leta 2010 še vedno imela 60,6-odstotni tržni delež.
Moreover, due to the continuous price pressure by the exporting producers the Union industry was forced to lower its sales prices to avoid a further shrinking of its market share.
Ta izguba tržnega deleža je sovpadala z zmanjšanjem potrošnje, vendar je zmanjšanje obsega prodaje industrije Unije preseglo zmanjšanje potrošnje.
Growth
Poleg tega je bila industrija Unije zaradi stalnega pritiska na cene, ki so ga izvajali proizvajalci izvozniki, prisiljena znižati svoje prodajne cene, da bi preprečila nadaljnje krčenje tržnega deleža.
The Union consumption decreased by around 11 % during the period considered, while the sales volume of the Union Industry on the Union market decreased by 11,4 %.
Rast
The Union Industry thus slightly lost market share, contrary to the market share of the imports from the countries concerned which increased somewhat during the period considered.
Potrošnja Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšala za približno 11 %, medtem ko se je obseg prodaje industrije Unije na trgu Unije zmanjšal za 11,4 %.
Employment and productivity
Tržni delež industrije Unije se je tako nekoliko zmanjšal v nasprotju s tržnim deležem uvoza iz zadevnih držav, ki se je v obravnavanem obdobju nekoliko povečal.
Employment and productivity developed over the period considered as follows:
Zaposlenost in produktivnost
Source: verified questionnaire replies.
Zaposlenost in produktivnost sta se v obravnavanem obdobju gibali na naslednji način:
Number of employees
Vir: preverjeni izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
Productivity (tonnes/employee)
Število zaposlenih
The level of the Union Industry employment decreased significantly in the period considered due to the decisions taken to reduce the production.
Produktivnost (v tonah/zaposlenega)
This resulted in a reduction of workforce by 9 % during the period considered.
Stopnja zaposlenosti v industriji Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju znatno zmanjšala zaradi odločitev, ki so bile sprejete, da bi se proizvodnja zmanjšala.
The productivity of the Union Industry's workforce, measured as output per person employed per year, decreased at a slower pace than the decrease in actual production.
To je privedlo do zmanjšanja delovne sile za 9 % v obravnavanem obdobju.
However, the latter indicator is not considered to be a relevant indicator for determining whether the Union Industry is efficient, in particular because the Union Industry has been producing proportionally more high permeability types during the period considered.
Produktivnost delovne sile industrije Unije, merjena s proizvodnjo na zaposleno osebo na leto, se je zmanjševala počasneje kot dejanska proizvodnja.