natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Markets which are authorised as FIEs or commodity exchanges on the date of adoption of this Decision should be therefore identified as markets considered equivalent to a regulated market within the meaning of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Trge, ki imajo na datum sprejetja tega sklepa dovoljenje kot borze finančnih instrumentov ali blagovne borze, je treba zato opredeliti kot trge, ki se štejejo za enakovredne reguliranemu trgu v skladu z Direktivo 2004/39/ES.
The legal framework of Japan for FIEs and commodity exchanges comprises the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act 2006 (FIEA), which establishes the regulatory framework for FIEs, and the Commodity Derivatives Act 2009 (CDA), which provides for the regulatory and supervisory framework for commodities exchanges.
Pravni okvir Japonske za borze finančnih instrumentov in blagovne borze sestavljata zakon o finančnih instrumentih in borzah iz leta 2006 (Financial Instruments and Exchange Act – FIEA), ki določa regulativni okvir za borze finančnih instrumentov, in zakon o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih na blago iz leta 2009 (Commodity Derivatives Act – CDA), ki določa regulativni in nadzorni okvir za blagovne borze.
Derivatives contracts with a commodity as an underlying are listed on a commodity exchange and derivatives based on financial instruments are listed on the FIEs.
Pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih, ki temeljijo na blagu, kotirajo na blagovni borzi, izvedeni finančni instrumenti, pri katerih je osnova finančni instrument, pa kotirajo na borzah finančnih instrumentov.
Rules for the FIEs are further developed in the Order for Enforcement of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and the Cabinet Office Ordinance on Financial Instruments Exchanges whereas rules for commodities exchanges are further detailed in the Order for Enforcement of the Commodities Derivatives Act and the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Commodity Derivatives Act.
Pravila za borze finančnih instrumentov so podrobneje razdelana v odredbi o izvrševanju zakona o finančnih instrumentih in borzah ter odloku kabineta vlade o borzah finančnih instrumentov, pravila za blagovne borze pa so podrobneje določena v odredbi o izvrševanju zakona o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih na blago ter odloku o izvrševanju zakona o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih na blago.
In addition, both the commodities exchange and the FIEs enjoy relatively wide self-regulatory power with regard to certain requirements.
Poleg tega imajo blagovne borze in borze finančnih instrumentov relativno široka pooblastila za samoregulacijo v zvezi z nekaterimi zahtevami.
The self-regulatory power of the FIE includes, in particular, business rules related to listing and delisting of financial instruments, trading arrangements and membership requirements.
Samoregulativna pooblastila borz finančnih instrumentov vključujejo zlasti pravila poslovanja v zvezi s kotiranjem in prenehanjem kotiranja finančnih instrumentov, ureditvami trgovanja in zahtevami v zvezi s članstvom.
The operational rules must be submitted to the Prime Minister of Japan for approval (Article 81 of the FIEA).
Operativna pravila se morajo predložiti v odobritev japonskemu predsedniku vlade (člen 81 FIEA).
The self-regulatory power of the commodity exchange is exercised by its Self-Regulatory Committee or Self-Regulatory Department.
Samoregulativna pooblastila blagovnih borz se izvajajo prek odbora ali oddelka za samoregulacijo.
The market rules of the commodity exchange set out trading rules and membership requirements, all which must be submitted to the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery (MAFF) and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) for approval.
Tržna pravila blagovnih borz določajo pravila trgovanja in zahteve glede članstva, vse skupaj pa se morajo predložiti v odobritev ministrstvu za kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo in ribištvo (MKGR) ter ministrstvu za gospodarstvo, trgovino in industrijo (MGTI).
The self-regulatory rules are legally binding upon exchanges.
Samoregulativna pravila so za borze pravno zavezujoča.
The legally binding requirements applicable to exchanges authorised in Japan deliver results equivalent to those of the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC in the following areas: authorisation process, definitional requirements, access to the exchange, organisational requirements, requirements for senior management, admission of financial instruments to trading, suspension and removal of instruments from trading, monitoring of compliance and access to clearing and settlement arrangements.
Pravno zavezujoče zahteve za borze z dovoljenjem na Japonskem zagotavljajo rezultate, enakovredne rezultatom na podlagi zahtev iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES, na naslednjih področjih: postopek odobritve, zahteve glede opredelitev, dostop do borz, organizacijske zahteve, zahteve za višje vodstvo, sprejem finančnih instrumentov v trgovanje, začasna ustavitev trgovanja s finančnimi instrumenti in njihov umik iz trgovanja, nadzor skladnosti in dostop do ureditev kliringa in poravnav.
Under Directive 2004/39/EC, pre- and post-trade transparency requirements apply only to shares admitted to trading on regulated markets.
V skladu z Direktivo 2004/39/ES se zahteve glede preglednosti pred trgovanjem in po njem uporabljajo samo za delnice, sprejete v trgovanje na reguliranih trgih.
Despite shares can be admitted to trading on FIEs, the Commission considers that the assessment of those requirements is however not relevant for the purposes of this Decision given that its objective is to verify the equivalence of the legally binding requirements applicable to third-country markets in respect of derivatives contracts that are executed on those markets.
Kljub temu, da se lahko delnice sprejmejo v trgovanje na borzah finančnih instrumentov, Komisija meni, da ocena navedenih zahtev ni relevantna za namene tega sklepa, saj je njen cilj preveriti enakovrednost pravno zavezujočih zahtev, ki se uporabljajo za trge tretjih držav v zvezi s pogodbami o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih, ki se izvršujejo na teh trgih.
It should therefore be concluded that the legally binding requirements for FIEs and commodity exchanges in Japan deliver results equivalent to those of the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Zato je ustrezno zaključiti, da pravno zavezujoče zahteve za borze finančnih instrumentov in blagovne borze na Japonskem zagotavljajo rezultate, enakovredne tistim na podlagi zahtev iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES.
The commodity exchanges operate under the supervision of the METI and the MAFF.
Blagovne borze poslujejo pod nadzorom MKGR in MGTI.
The CDA provides a framework for supervisory powers of the METI and the MAFF.
CDA določa okvir za nadzorna pooblastila MKGR in MGTI.
In particular, the METI and the MAFF approve the market rules, brokerage contract rules, dispute resolution rules or market transactions surveillance committee rules of a commodity exchange and any changes thereto.
MKGR in MGTI zlasti odobrita tržna pravila, pravila za pogodbe o borznem posredništvu, pravila o reševanju sporov ali pravila o odboru za nadzor tržnih transakcij borze ter njihove spremembe.
Furthermore, in order to ensure fair trading and investor protection, the METI and the MAFF may require a commodity exchange to change its articles of incorporation, other rules or its business methods or take any other measures to improve the operation of its business.
Poleg tega lahko za zagotovitev poštenega trgovanja in zaščite vlagateljev MKGR in MGTI od blagovne borze zahtevata, da spremeni statut, druga pravila ali poslovne metode ali da sprejme katere koli druge ukrepe za izboljšanje svojega poslovanja.
If a commodity exchange fails to properly exercise its self-regulatory power and does not take necessary measures to ensure fair trading and investor protection, the METI and the MAFF may withdraw the licence or suspend the whole or a part of the exchange's business.
Če blagovna borza ne izvaja pravilno svojih samoregulativnih pooblastil in ne sprejme potrebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev poštenega trgovanja in zaščite vlagateljev, ji lahko MKGR in MGTI odvzameta licenco ali začasno ustavita celotno ali del njenega poslovanja.
The FIEs are subject to supervision of the Prime Minister of Japan, whose power is delegated to the Commissioner of the Japan Financial Services Agency (JFSA).
Za nadzor borz finančnih instrumentov je pristojen japonski predsednik vlade, katerega pooblastilo je preneseno na komisarja japonske agencije za finančne storitve (Japan Financial Services Agency – JFSA).
Section 5 of Chapter V of the FIEA lays down the supervisory measures available to the JFSA.
V oddelku 5 poglavja V FIEA so določeni nadzorni ukrepi, ki so na voljo JFSA.
In particular, when the FIE violates laws and regulations, the JFSA may withdraw the licence or issue an order of suspension of all or part of the FIE's business.
Zlasti lahko JFSA, kadar borza finančnih instrumentov krši pravila in predpise, odvzame licenco ali izda odredbo o začasni ustavitvi celotnega ali dela poslovanja te borze.
Furthermore, the JFSA may require the FIE to change its articles of incorporation, operational rules, brokerage contract rules or any other rules or trade practice or to take other necessary measures for supervision.
Poleg tega lahko JFSA od borze finančnih instrumentov zahteva, da spremeni svoj statut, operativna pravila, pravila za pogodbe o borznem posredništvu oziroma vsa druga pravila ali trgovske prakse ali pa sprejme druge potrebne ukrepe za nadzor.
The FIE's articles of incorporations must include sanctions for violation of its business rules by the members.
Statut borze finančnih instrumentov mora vključevati sankcije za člane, ki kršijo njena pravila poslovanja.
If the FIE fails to perform effectively the market surveillance, the JFSA may take enforcement actions, including licence withdrawal or business suspension.
Če borza finančnih instrumentov trga ne nadzira učinkovito, lahko JSFA sprejme izvršilne ukrepe, vključno z odvzemom licence ali začasno ustavitvijo njenega poslovanja.
It should therefore be concluded that FIEs and commodity exchanges are subject to effective supervision and enforcement in Japan on an ongoing basis.
Zato je ustrezno zaključiti, da za borze finančnih instrumentov in blagovne borze na Japonskem veljata stalen učinkovit nadzor in izvrševanje.
The conditions laid down in Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 should therefore be considered to be satisfied with respect to FIEs and commodity exchanges authorised in Japan.
Tako bi bilo treba pogoje iz člena 2a Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 v zvezi z borzami finančnih instrumentov in blagovnimi borzami z dovoljenjem na Japonskem šteti za izpolnjene.
This Decision is based on the legally binding requirements relating to FIEs and commodity exchanges applicable in Japan at the time of the adoption of this Decision.
Ta sklep temelji na pravno zavezujočih zahtevah za borze finančnih instrumentov in blagovne borze, ki veljajo na Japonskem v času sprejetja tega sklepa.
The Commission should continue monitoring on a regular basis the evolution of the legal and supervisory arrangements for these markets and the fulfilment of the conditions on the basis of which this Decision has been taken.
Komisija bi morala še naprej redno spremljati razvoj pravnih in nadzornih ureditev za te trge ter izpolnjevanje pogojev, na podlagi katerih je bil ta sklep sprejet.
In particular, the Commission should review this Decision in light of the entry into application of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] and Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Komisija bi morala ta sklep pregledati zlasti zaradi začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) št. 600/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] ter Direktive 2014/65/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].
The regular review of the legal and supervisory arrangements applicable to FIEs and commodity exchanges in Japan is without prejudice to the possibility of the Commission to undertake a specific review at any time where relevant developments make it necessary for the Commission to reassess the equivalence granted by this Decision.
Redni pregled pravnih in nadzornih ureditev, ki se uporabljajo za borze finančnih instrumentov in blagovne borze na Japonskem, ne posega v možnost Komisije, da kadar koli izvede poseben pregled, če mora zaradi razvoja dogodkov ponovno oceniti enakovrednost, odobreno s tem sklepom.
For the purposes of point (7) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 authorised financial instrument exchanges and commodity exchanges in Japan and set out in the Annex shall be considered as equivalent to regulated markets as defined in point (14) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Za namene točke 7 člena 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 se borze finančnih instrumentov in blagovne borze z dovoljenjem na Japonskem, ki so navedene v Prilogi, štejejo za enakovredne reguliranim trgom, kot so opredeljeni v točki 14 člena 4(1) Direktive 2004/39/ES.
Done at Brussels, 15 December 2016.
V Bruslju, 15. decembra 2016
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 84).
Uredba (EU) št. 600/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o trgih finančnih instrumentov in spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 (UL L 173, 12.6.2014, str. 84).
Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 349).
Direktiva 2014/65/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o trgih finančnih instrumentov ter spremembi Direktive 2002/92/ES in Direktive 2011/61/EU (UL L 173, 12.6.2014, str. 349).
Financial instrument exchanges and commodity exchanges in Japan referred to in Article 1:
Borze finančnih instrumentov in blagovne borze na Japonskem iz člena 1:
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2272
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/2272
on the equivalence of financial markets in Australia in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o enakovrednosti finančnih trgov v Avstraliji v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
In accordance with Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, a third-country market is considered equivalent to a regulated market where it complies with legally binding requirements which are equivalent to the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC and is subject to effective supervision and enforcement in that third country on an ongoing basis.
V skladu s členom 2a Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 se trg tretje države šteje za enakovrednega reguliranemu trgu, kadar izpolnjuje pravno zavezujoče zahteve, ki so enakovredne zahtevam iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES, ter je predmet stalnega učinkovitega nadzora in izvrševanja v tej tretji državi.
The purpose of this equivalence assessment is therefore to verify that the legally binding requirements which apply to financial markets in Australia are equivalent to the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC, and that those markets are subject to effective supervision and enforcement on an ongoing basis.
Namen te ocene enakovrednosti je torej preveriti, ali so pravno zavezujoče zahteve, ki se uporabljajo za finančne trge v Avstraliji, enakovredne zahtevam iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES ter ali so navedeni trgi predmet stalnega učinkovitega nadzora in izvrševanja.
Markets which are authorised as financial markets in Australia on the date of adoption of this Decision should be therefore identified as markets considered equivalent to a regulated market within the meaning of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Trge, ki imajo v Avstraliji na datum sprejetja tega sklepa dovoljenje kot finančni trgi, je treba zato opredeliti kot trge, ki se štejejo za enakovredne reguliranemu trgu v skladu z Direktivo 2004/39/ES.
The Corporations Act 2001 (Corporations Act) is the primary legislation which establishes legally enforceable regimes for financial markets under the Australian market licencing (AML) regime and the Market Integrity Rules (MIRs) regime.
Zakon o gospodarskih družbah iz leta 2001 je primarni zakonodajni akt, ki določa pravno zavezujoče režime za finančne trge v skladu z avstralskim režimom za tržne licence in predpisi za integriteto na trgih (Market Integrity Rules – MIR).
The operation of a financial market in Australia requires a licence.
Za upravljanje finančnega trga v Avstraliji je potrebna licenca.
The Corporations Act establishes a rule-making regime allowing the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to adopt MIRs which apply to market operators, market participants, other prescribed entities and financial products traded on financial markets.
Zakon o gospodarskih družbah vzpostavlja režim za izdajo predpisov, ki avstralski agenciji za vrednostne papirje in naložbe (Australian Securities and Investments Commission – ASIC) omogoča sprejemanje MIR, ki se uporabljajo za upravljavce trgov, udeležence na trgih, druge predpisane subjekte in finančne produkte, s katerimi se trguje na trgih.
Further requirements are specified in secondary or delegated instruments adopted under the Corporations Act including the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Corporations Regulations).
Nadaljnje zahteve so določene v sekundarnih ali delegiranih zakonodajnih instrumentih, sprejetih v skladu z zakonom o gospodarskih družbah, med katere spadajo tudi predpisi za gospodarske družbe iz leta 2001.
Finally, ASIC issues regulatory guidance, which further explains how licensees may comply with the relevant provisions of the Corporations Act, including obligations for AML holders to maintain adequate arrangements for operating the markets, to ensure a fair, orderly and transparent market, and other requirements that are amongst the criteria to be assessed.
ASIC izdaja tudi regulativne smernice, ki nadalje razlagajo, kako lahko imetniki licence izpolnjujejo zadevne določbe iz zakona o gospodarskih družbah, kar vključuje obveznosti za imetnike tržne licence, da ohranjajo zadostne ureditve za upravljanje trgov za zagotavljanje pravičnosti, nemotenega delovanja in preglednosti trgov, ter druge zahteve, ki spadajo med merila, ki se ocenjujejo.
Failure to comply with regulatory guidance leads to an enforcement action carried out by ASIC.
Če se regulativne smernice ne upoštevajo, ASIC sprejme izvršilne ukrepe.
The legally binding requirements set out in legislation, MIRs and regulatory guidance of financial markets authorised in Australia deliver results equivalent to those of the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC in the following areas: authorisation process, definitional requirements, access to the recognised exchange, organisational requirements, requirements for senior management, admission of financial instruments to trading, suspension and removal of instruments from trading, monitoring of compliance with the rules of the financial market and access to clearing and settlement arrangements.
Pravno zavezujoče zahteve, določene v zakonodaji, MIR in regulativnih smernicah, za finančne trge z dovoljenjem v Avstraliji zagotavljajo rezultate, enakovredne rezultatom na podlagi zahtev iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES, na naslednjih področjih: postopek odobritve, zahteve glede opredelitev, dostop do priznane borze, organizacijske zahteve, zahteve za višje vodstvo, sprejem finančnih instrumentov v trgovanje, začasna ustavitev trgovanja z instrumenti in njihov umik iz trgovanja, nadzor skladnosti s pravili finančnega trga in dostop do ureditev kliringa in poravnav.
Despite shares can be admitted to trading on financial markets in Australia, the Commission considers that the assessment of those requirements is however not relevant for the purposes of this Decision given that its objective is to verify the equivalence of the legally binding requirements applicable to third-country markets in respect of derivatives contracts that are executed on those markets.
Kljub temu, da se lahko delnice sprejmejo v trgovanje na finančnih trgih v Avstraliji, Komisija meni, da ocena navedenih zahtev ni relevantna za namene tega sklepa, saj je njen cilj preveriti enakovrednost pravno zavezujočih zahtev, ki se uporabljajo za trge tretjih držav v zvezi s pogodbami o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih, ki se izvršujejo na teh trgih.
It should therefore be concluded that the legally binding requirements for financial markets authorised in Australia deliver substantive results equivalent to those of the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Zato je ustrezno zaključiti, da pravno zavezujoče zahteve za finančne trge z dovoljenjem v Avstraliji zagotavljajo rezultate, ki so v veliki meri enakovredni tistim na podlagi zahtev iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES.
ASIC is a public authority established under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (the ASIC Act) and is responsible for administering and enforcing the law concerning Australian financial markets.
ASIC je javni organ, ustanovljen v skladu z zakonom o avstralski agenciji za vrednostne papirje in naložbe iz leta 2001 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zakon o ASIC), ki je pristojen za upravljanje in izvrševanje zakonodaje v zvezi z avstralskimi finančnimi trgi.
The regulatory and enforcement powers of ASIC include investigation of suspected breaches of the law, issuance of infringement notices, seeking civil penalties from the courts and commencing prosecutions.
Med regulativna in izvršilna pooblastila ASIC spadajo preiskovanje domnevnih kršitev zakonodaje, izdajanje obvestil o kršitvah, uveljavljanje denarnih kazni prek sodišč in tožbe.
Furthermore, ASIC has the power to inspect financial markets without prior notice.
Poleg tega lahko ASIC izvaja tudi inšpekcije na finančnih trgih brez predhodnega obvestila.
This includes the power to inspect registers, records and documents.
To vključuje pooblastilo za pregledovanje registrov, evidenc in dokumentov.
Furthermore, the Minister for Financial Services may give written directions to a financial market operator to take specified measures to ensure compliance with its obligations as a financial market licensee where the Minister is of the opinion that those obligations are not being met (s.
Poleg tega lahko minister za finančne storitve izda pisna navodila za upravljavca finančnega trga, da sprejme določene ukrepe za zagotovitev, da izpolnjuje zahteve kot imetnik licence za upravljanje finančnega trga, če meni, da se te zahteve ne izpolnjujejo (oddelek 794A zakona o gospodarskih družbah).
794A of the Corporations Act).
Če finančni trg ne izpolni tega navodila, lahko ASIC od sodišča zahteva, da izda odločbo, s katero zahteva izpolnitev navodila (oddelek 794A zakona o gospodarskih družbah).
If the financial market does not comply with that direction, ASIC may apply to the court for an order requiring compliance (s.
ASIC ima tudi pooblastilo, da subjektu izda navodilo (to vključuje upravljavce trga in udeležence na trgih z licenco), če meni, da je to potrebno ali v javnem interesu, da se zaščiti osebe, ki trgujejo s finančnim produktom ali razredi finančnih produktov (oddelek 798J zakona o gospodarskih družbah).
794A of the Corporations Act).
Poleg tega lahko ASIC za potrebe izvrševanja svojih regulativnih in preiskovalnih ukrepov zahteva sodne odločbe in zadeve posreduje v sodne postopke.
ASIC also has the power to give a direction to an entity (including market operators and participants of licensed markets), where it is of the opinion that it is necessary, or in the public interest, to protect people dealing in a financial product or classes of financial products (s.
ASIC lahko od sodišča zahteva, da izda odločbo, s katero zahteva spoštovanje ukrepov ASIC, sprejetih na podlagi njenih regulativnih in preiskovalnih pristojnosti (oddelek 70 zakona o ASIC).
798J of the Corporations Act).
Če subjekt ne izpolni navodila, izdanega v skladu z zakonom o gospodarskih družbah, lahko ASIC od sodišča zahteva, da izda odločbo o izpolnjevanju navodila.