natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission finally recalls that the Court of Justice, in its judgment in Lucchini, held that a national court was prevented from applying national law where the application of that law would have the effect of frustrating ‘the application of Community law in so far as it would make it impossible to recover State aid that was granted in breach of Community law’.
Komisija je v skladu s Pogodbo in ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča pristojna za odločanje, ali mora zadevna država članica ukiniti ali spremeniti pomoč, za katero je ugotovila, da ni združljiva z notranjim trgom.
The principle underlying this pronouncement is that a rule of national law cannot be applied where such application would frustrate the proper application of Union law.
Prav tako je Sodišče večkrat odločilo, da je namen obveznosti države, da ukine pomoč, za katero Komisija meni, da ni združljiva z notranjim trgom, ponovna vzpostavitev prejšnjih razmer.
As regards the additional compensation awarded to CSTP by the Consiglio di Stato, the Commission observes that, while no reference was made to Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 in the operative part of the Consiglio di Stato’s judgment, that judgment refers to CSTP’s right to receive amounts by way of compensation pursuant to Articles 6, 10 and 11 of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, which must be determined by the administration on the basis of reliable data.
V zvezi s tem je Sodišče navedlo, da je ta cilj dosežen, ko prejemnik povrne zneske, dodeljene na podlagi nezakonite pomoči, in tako izgubi prednost, ki jo je imel pred konkurenti na trgu, in ko se ponovno vzpostavijo razmere pred izplačilom pomoči.
This would suggest that CSTP’s right to additional compensation flows, according to the Consiglio di Stato, not from a general rule of compensation for damages as a result of a wrongful act or other conduct of the national authorities, but from rights allegedly derived from Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69.
V skladu z navedeno sodno prakso je v členu 14 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 določeno, da „[č]e se v primerih nezakonite pomoči sprejmejo negativne odločbe, Komisija odloči, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da upravičenec vrne pomoč“.
In any event, the Commission considers that an award of damages in favour of CSTP for the alleged illegal unilateral imposition of PSOs by the Italian authorities, calculated on the basis of the common compensation procedure laid down by Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, would be in breach of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty.
Zato mora Italija izterjati državno pomoč, opredeljeno v tem sklepu, če je že bila izplačana družbi CSTP.
This is because such an award would produce the same result for CSTP as an award of public service compensation for the period under review, despite the fact that the concession specifications governing the services in question were neither exempt from prior notification nor complied with the substantive requirements of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 or Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, as demonstrated above.
Italija mora znesku navedene pomoči dodati obresti za vračilo, izračunane od datuma, ko je bila nezakonita pomoč na voljo družbi CSTP (tj. od 21. decembra 2012), do datuma njenega vračila, v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004.
The availability of such an award would thus effectively enable the circumvention of the state aid rules and of the conditions laid down by the Union legislator under which competent authorities, when imposing or contracting for PSOs, compensate public service operators for costs incurred in return for the discharge of PSOs.
V skladu s tem je Komisija –
Indeed, an award of damages equal to the sum of the amounts of aid that were planned to be granted would constitute an indirect grant of state aid found to be unlawful and incompatible with the internal market.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Following that line, the General Court has considered indemnification clauses for the recovery of state aid to constitute state aid.
Člen 1
In any event, the sample concession contract from 1972 under which CSTP was supposedly providing the transport services in question did not provide for the payment of any financial compensation.
Državna pomoč v višini 4 951 838 EUR, ki jo je Italijanska republika nezakonito dodelila družbi CSTP in ki krši člen 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju EU, ni združljiva z notranjim trgom.
CSTP agreed to run the services under the conditions established in the concession at its own risk.
Člen 2
That conclusion is also confirmed by Article 2 of Regional Law No 16/1983, which provided that any loss or deficit not covered by public contributions was to be borne by the service providers.
Italijanska republika od upravičenca izterja pomoč iz člena 1.
Accordingly, the Commission does not consider the judgment of the Consiglio di Stato to constitute an award of compensation for damages suffered by CSTP as a result of the wrongful act or other conduct of the national authorities, but as the grant of unlawful and incompatible state aid, which is prohibited under Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Zneski za izterjavo vključujejo obresti od 21. decembra 2012 do dne, ko so v celoti povrnjeni.
In light of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the non-notified measure constitutes state aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty which is incompatible with the internal market.
Obrestna mera se izračuna na podlagi obrestnoobrestnega računa v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004 in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 271/2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004.
RECOVERY OF THE AID
Italijanska republika prekliče vsa neporavnana plačila pomoči iz člena 1 z datumom sprejetja tega sklepa.
In accordance with the Treaty and the Court of Justice’s established case-law, the Commission is competent to decide that the Member State concerned must abolish or alter aid when it has found that it is incompatible with the internal market.
Člen 3
The Court of Justice has also consistently held that the obligation on a State to abolish aid regarded by the Commission as being incompatible with the internal market is designed to re-establish the previously existing situation.
Izterjava pomoči iz člena 1 se izvede takoj in učinkovito.
In this context, the CJEU has stated that that objective is attained once the recipient has repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to the payment of the aid is restored.
Italijanska republika zagotovi, da se ta sklep izvede v štirih mesecih od datuma uradnega obvestila o tem sklepu.
In line with that case-law, Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 provides that ‘where negative decisions are taken in respect of unlawful aid, the Commission shall decide that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary’.
Člen 4
Therefore, the state aid identified in this Decision must be recovered by Italy, insofar as it has already been paid out to CSTP.
Italija v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tem sklepu Komisiji predloži naslednje informacije:
Italy must add recovery interest to that aid amount, calculated from the date on which the unlawful aid was put at the disposal of CSTP (i.e. from 21 December 2012) until the date of its recovery, according to Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki se izterja od upravičenca;
Accordingly, the Commission,
podroben opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s tem sklepom;
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da se je od upravičenca zahtevalo vračilo pomoči.
Article 1
Italijanska republika obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede sprejetih nacionalnih ukrepov za izvajanje tega sklepa, dokler se pomoč iz člena 1 ne izterja v celoti.
The state aid amounting to EUR 4 951 838 in favour of CSTP unlawfully granted by the Italian Republic, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, is incompatible with the internal market.
Na zahtevo Komisije predloži informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s tem sklepom.
Article 2
Prav tako predloži podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih za vračilo, ki jih je prejemnik že vrnil.
The Italian Republic shall recover the aid referred to in Article 1 from the beneficiary.
Člen 5
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from 21 December 2012 until their actual recovery.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Italijansko republiko.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
V Bruslju, 19. januarja 2015
The Italian Republic shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 1 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Za Komisijo
Article 3
Članica Komisije
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Sklep Komisije z dne 20. februarja 2014 o državni pomoči SA.358423 (2012/NN) – Italija – Nadomestilo za opravljanje javne službe za CSTP (UL C 156, 23.5.2014, str. 39).
The Italian Republic shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of its notification.
Komisija opozarja, da imajo v skladu s členom 15 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1) pooblastila Komisije zahtevati vračilo pomoči desetletni zastaralni rok, ki začne teči na dan, ko je dodeljena nezakonita pomoč upravičencu kot individualna pomoč ali kot pomoč v okviru sheme pomoči.
Article 4
Kakršen koli ukrep glede nezakonite pomoči, ki ga sprejme Komisija ali država članica na zahtevo Komisije, prekine zastaralni rok.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Italy shall submit the following information to the Commission:
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 1191/69 z dne 26. junija 1969 o ukrepanju držav članic glede obveznosti javne službe v železniškem in cestnem prometu ter prometu po celinskih plovnih poteh (UL L 156, 28.6.1969, str. 1).
the total amount (principal and interest) to be recovered from the beneficiary;
Legge Regionale 25 gennaio 1983, n. 16 Interventi regionali in materia di servizi di trasporto pubblico locale per viaggiatori (Regionalni zakon z dne 25. januarja 1983, št. 16: Regionalni ukrepi za storitve lokalnega potniškega prevoza), na voljo na spletni povezavi: http://jtest.ittig.cnr.it:8080/cocoon/regioneCampania/xhtml?css=4&doc=/db/nir/RegioneCampania/1983/urn_nir_regione.campania_legge_1983-01-25n16&datafine=19830205.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
V členu 10 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1191/69 je določeno, da se višina nadomestila v zvezi z obveznostjo opravljanja prevoznih storitev določi kot razlika med zmanjšanjem prihodkov in zmanjšanjem stroškov zaradi prenehanja zadevne obveznosti v zadevnem obdobju.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, EU:C:2003:415.
The Italian Republic shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until the aid referred to in Article 1 has been fully recovered.
Uredba (ES) št. 1370/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o javnih storitvah železniškega in cestnega potniškega prevoza ter o razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 1191/69 in (EGS) št. 1107/70 (UL L 315, 3.12.2007, str. 1).
At the Commission’s request, it shall submit information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Obrazci E (Modelli E) so dokumenti na podlagi računovodskih izkazov družbe, ki vsebujejo informacije, potrebne za letni izračun javnega prispevka.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the recipient.
Zadeva C-527/12, Komisija proti Nemčiji, EU:C:2014:2193, točka 56 in navedena sodna praksa.
Article 5
Glej tudi zadevo C-119/05, Lucchini, EU:C:2007:434, točka 59, opisano v uvodni izjavi 94.
This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, EU:C:2003:415, točki 87 in 88.
Done at Brussels, 19 January 2015.
Zadeva C-172/03, Heiser, EU:C:2005:130, točka 55.
Commission Decision of 20 February 2014 on State aid SA.358423 (2012/NN) — Italy — PSO compensation for CSTP, OJ C 156 (23.5.2014, p. 39).
Zadeva C-156/77, Komisija proti Belgiji, Recueil 1978, str. 1881, točka 10.
The Commission recalls that pursuant to Article 15 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1), the powers of the Commission to recover aid are subject to a limitation period of 10 years, beginning on the day on which the unlawful aid is awarded to the beneficiary either as individual aid or as aid under an aid scheme.
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 1107/70 z dne 4. junija 1970 o dodeljevanju pomoči v železniškem in cestnem prevozu ter prevozu po celinskih plovnih poteh
Any action taken by the Commission or by a Member State, acting at the request of the Commission, with regard to the unlawful aid interrupts the limitation period.
Zadeva C-334/0 P, Komisija proti Freistaat Sachsen, ZOdl.
Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 of the Council of 26 June 1969 on action by Member States concerning the obligations inherent in the concept of a public service in transport by rail, road and inland waterway (OJ L 156, 28.6.1969, p. 1).
2008, str.
Article 4(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 states that: ‘It shall be for transport undertakings to apply to the competent authorities of the Member States for the termination in whole or in part of any public service obligation where such obligation entails economic disadvantages for them’.
I-9465, točke 50 do 53; zadeva T-3/09, Italija proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Article 6(3) reads: ‘The competent authorities of the Member States shall take decisions within one year of the date on which the application is lodged as regards obligations to operate or to carry, and within six months as regards tariff obligations.
2011, str.
The right to compensation shall arise on the date of the decision by the competent authorities…’.
II-95, točka 60.
Legge Regionale 25 gennaio 1983, n.
Kot je na primer škodno dejanje ali neupravičena obogatitev.
16 Interventi regionali in materia di servizi di trasporto pubblico locale per viaggiatori (Regional measures for local passenger transport services) available at: http://jtest.ittig.cnr.it:8080/cocoon/regioneCampania/xhtml?css=4&doc=/db/nir/RegioneCampania/1983/urn_nir_regione.campania_legge_1983-01-25n16&datafine=19830205
Združene zadeve C-106 do C-120/87, Asteris AE in drugi proti Grčiji in EGS, EU:C:1988:457.
Article 10 of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 provides that the amount of compensation related to an obligation to provide transport services is to be determined as the difference between the reduction of revenues and the reduction of costs resulting from the termination of the corresponding obligation during the period concerned.
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 16. junija 2004 o državni pomoči N 304/2003 – Nizozemska – Pomoč v korist Akzo Nobel za zmanjšanje števila prevozov klora, povzetek v UL C 81, 2.4.2005, str. 4; glej tudi Odločbo Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2006 o državni pomoči N 575/2005 – Nizozemska – Pomoč za premestitev družbe za razgradnjo avtomobilov Steenbergen, povzetek v UL C 80, 13.4.2007, str. 1.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, [2003] EU.C.2003.415.
Zadeva C-119/05, Lucchini, EU:C:2007:434, točka 59.
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 1).
Glej prejšnjo opombo, točka 61.
Modelli E, namely the documents based on the accounts of the company containing the information necessary for the annual calculation of the public contribution.
Mnenje z dne 28. aprila 2005 v združenih zadevah C-346/03 in C-529/03, Atzori, EU:C:2005:256, točka 198.
See also Case C-119/05 Lucchini, EU:C:2007:434, paragraph 59, described in recital (94) below.
Po analogiji glej tudi zadevo C-111/10, Komisija proti Svetu, EU:C:2013:785, točka 44.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans v Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, [2003] EU:C:2003:415, paragraphs 87 and 88.
Zadeva C-70/72, Komisija proti Nemčiji, Recueil 1973, str. 813, točka 13.
Case C-172/03 Heiser, EU:C:2005:130, paragraph 55.
Združene zadeve C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1994, str.
Case T-157/01 Danske Busvognmænd, [2004] EU:2004:76, paragraphs 77, 78 and 79.
I-04103, točka 75.
Case C-504/07 Associação Nacional de Transportadores Rodoviários de Pesados de Passageiros (Antrop) and Others v Conselho de Ministros, Companhia Carris de Ferro de Lisboa SA (Carris) and Sociedade de Transportes Colectivos do Porto SA (STCP), [2009] EU:C:2009.290.
Zadeva C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str.
Case 156/77 Commission v Belgium, [1978] ECR 1881, paragraph 10.
I-3671, točki 64 in 65.
Regulation (EEC) No 1107/70 of the Council of 4 June 1970 on the granting of aids for transport by rail, road and inland waterway (OJ L 130, 15.6.1970, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
The Commission refers in this respect to the reasoning developed in recitals 307 to 313 of its Decision 2011/3/EU of 24 February 2010 concerning public transport service contracts between the Danish Ministry of Transport and Danske Statsbaner (Case C41/08) (ex NN 35/08) (OJ L 7, 11.1.2011, p. 1).
Glej člen 14(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999.
That Decision was annulled by the General Court in Case T-92/11 Jørgen Andersen v European Commission, [2013] not yet published, and an appeal against that judgment is currently pending before the Court of Justice in Case C-303/13 P. The outcome of that appeal is not relevant for the outcome of the present case, since the General Court confirmed in the judgment under appeal that it is the date on which the effects of the disbursed aid occurred which determines which set of rules applies.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
In this case the aid was paid on 21 December 2012, so the rules, principles and criteria for assessing the compatibility of state aid which are in force at the date on which the Commission takes its decision should be applied (see, paragraph 39 of that judgment).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 271/2008 z dne 30. januarja 2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 82, 25.3.2008, str. 1).
Case C-334/0 P Commission v Freistaat Sachsen, [2008] ECR I-9465, paragraphs 50 to 53; Case T-3/09 Italy v Commission, [2011] ECR II-95, paragraph 60.
Po navedbah italijanskih organov navedenemu strokovnjaku ni uspelo določiti višine nadomestila, zato je sodišče Consiglio di Stato z odredbo št. 5897/2011 z dne 7. novembra 2011 imenovalo dodatnega strokovnjaka in šele z njegovo pomočjo je bil izračunan točen znesek nadomestila, in sicer po „induktivni metodi“, kot jo je vrhovno sodišče za upravne zadeve določilo z odredbo št. 3244/2011 z dne 25. julija 2011.
For example tort or unjust enrichment.
Na podlagi navedenih izračunov sta strokovnjaka z uporabo formule iz člena 11 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1191/69 (tj. tarifne obveznosti) sklenila, da je družba CSTP prejela nezadostno nadomestilo le za leto 1998.
Joined Cases 106 to 120/87, Asteris AE and others v Greece and EEC, EU:C:1988:457.
V skladu s tem je sodišče Consiglio di Stato v sodbi št. 5649/2012 z dne 7. novembra 2012 dodatno nadomestilo, ki ga je morala regija plačati družbi CSTP, ocenilo na 4 951 838 EUR, kar je pomenilo znesek nezadostnega nadomestila za leto 1998, in odločilo, da se plačilo tega zneska izvede 7. decembra 2012.
See Commission Decision of 16 June 2004 on Dutch aid in favour of Akzo Nobel in order to minimise chlorine transports (Case N 304/2003), summary notice in OJ C 81, 2.4.2005, p. 4; see also Commission Decision of 20 December 2006 on Dutch aid for relocation of car dismantling company Steenbergen (Case N 575/2005), summary notice in OJ C 80, 13.4.2007, p. 1.
Regija je navedeni znesek družbi CSTP plačala 21. decembra 2012.
Case C-119/05 Lucchini, EU:C:2007:434, paragraph 59.
Regija je obveznosti javne službe družbi CSTP naložila s koncesijskim aktom leta 1972/1973, te obveznosti pa so bile obnovljene vsako leto do leta 2003.
Ibid, paragraph 61.
Dejstvo, da so bile družbi CSTP v obravnavanem obdobju naložene obveznosti javne službe, kot so tarifne obveznosti ter obveznosti v zvezi s progami, voznim redom in postajališči, naj bi bilo razvidno iz:
Opinion of 28 April 2005 in Joined Cases C-346/03 and C-529/03 Atzori, EU:C:2005:256, paragraph 198.
Prvič, Komisija ugotavlja, da se dodatno nadomestilo, dodeljeno družbi CSTP, nanaša le na leto 1998.
Case T-384/08 Elliniki Nafpigokataskevastiki AE Chartofylakeiou v Commission, EU:T:2011:650, and Case T-565/08 Corsica Ferries v Commission, EU:T:2012:415, paragraphs 23, 114 and 120 to 131.
Družba CSTP je priznala, da je navedenega leta poleg domnevnih obveznosti javne službe opravljala tudi komercialne dejavnosti, in sicer storitve oddajanja.
See also, by analogy, Case C-111/10 Commission v Council, EU:C:2013:785, paragraph 44.
V členu 4(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 1191/69 je navedeno: „Prevozna podjetja zaprosijo pristojne organe držav članic za prenehanje obveznosti vsake javne službe v celoti ali delno, kadar jim taka obveznost povzroča gospodarsko izgubo.“ V členu 6(3) je navedeno: „Pristojni organi držav članic sprejmejo odločitve v enem letu od dneva, ko se je vložila vloga v zvezi z obveznostmi za upravljanje ali izvajanje prevozov, za tarifne obveznosti pa v šestih mesecih.
Case C-70/72 Commission v Germany, [1973] ECR 813, paragraph 13.
Pravica do nadomestila se pridobi na dan odločitve pristojnih organov […].“
Joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92 Spain v Commission, [1994] ECR I-04103, paragraph 75.
Komisija se v zvezi s tem sklicuje na argumente iz uvodnih izjav 307 do 313 svojega Sklepa 2011/3/EU z dne 24. februarja 2010 o pogodbah o izvajanju javne službe prevoza, ki sta jih sklenila dansko ministrstvo za promet in družba Danske Statsbaner (Državna pomoč C 41/08 (ex NN 35/08)) (UL L 7, 11.1.2011, str. 1).
Case C-75/97 Belgium v Commission, [1999] ECR I-3671, paragraphs 64 and 65.
Navedeni sklep je Splošno sodišče razveljavilo s sodbo v zadevi T-92/11, Jørgen Andersen proti Evropski komisiji [2013], ki še ni bila objavljena in zoper katero teče postopek pritožbe pred Sodiščem v zadevi C-303/13 P. Izid navedene pritožbe ni pomemben za izid tega primera, saj je Splošno sodišče v sodbi, zoper katero teče postopek pritožbe, potrdilo, da je od datuma, ko se pojavijo učinki izplačane pomoči, odvisno, kateri sklop pravil se uporablja.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
Strokovnjaka, ki ju je imenovalo sodišče Consiglio di Stato, sta izračunala, da je družba CSTP zaradi domnevno naloženih tarifnih obveznosti imela gospodarsko izgubo v obliki nezadostnega nadomestila le leta 1998, in sicer v višini 4 951 838 EUR.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 82, 25.3.2008, p. 1).
Regija je 21. decembra 2012 plačala ta znesek družbi CSTP, da bi izvršila zadevno sodbo.
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1075
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/1075