natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For reasons of coherence and in order to facilitate the commercial exploitation of trade marks in the Union, the rules applicable to trade marks as objects of property should be aligned to the extent appropriate with those already in place for EU trade marks, and should include rules on assignment and transfer, licensing, rights in rem and levy of execution.
Zaradi skladnosti in lažje komercialne uporabe blagovnih znamk v Uniji bi bilo treba pravila, ki se uporabljajo za blagovne znamke kot predmet lastnine, v ustreznem obsegu uskladiti s tistimi, ki že veljajo za blagovne znamke EU, poleg tega pa bi morala vključevati pravila o prenosu, licencah, stvarnih pravicah in izvršbi.
Collective trade marks have proven a useful instrument for promoting goods or services with specific common properties.
Izkazalo se je, da so kolektivne blagovne znamke koristen instrument za promoviranje blaga ali storitev z določenimi skupnimi lastnostmi.
It is therefore appropriate to subject national collective trade marks to rules similar to the rules applicable to European Union collective marks.
Zato je primerno, da za nacionalne kolektivne blagovne znamke veljajo pravila, ki so podobna pravilom, ki se uporabljajo za kolektivne znamke Evropske unije.
In order to improve and facilitate access to trade mark protection and to increase legal certainty and predictability, the procedure for the registration of trade marks in the Member States should be efficient and transparent and should follow rules similar to those applicable to EU trade marks.
Zaradi boljšega in lažjega dostopa do zaščite blagovnih znamk ter povečanja pravne varnosti in predvidljivosti bi moral biti postopek za registracijo blagovnih znamk v državah članicah učinkovit in pregleden ter bi moral upoštevati pravila, podobna tistim, ki se uporabljajo za blagovne znamke EU.
In order to ensure legal certainty with regard to the scope of trade mark rights and to facilitate access to trade mark protection, the designation and classification of goods and services covered by a trade mark application should follow the same rules in all Member States and should be aligned to those applicable to EU trade marks.
Zaradi zagotovitve pravne varnosti v zvezi z obsegom pravic iz blagovne znamke in lažjega dostopa do varstva blagovne znamke bi morala v vseh državah članicah za določitev ter razvrstitev blaga in storitev, za katere se vloži prijava blagovne znamke, veljati ista pravila, ki bi morala biti usklajena s pravili, ki se uporabljajo za blagovne znamke EU.
In order to enable the competent authorities and economic operators to determine the extent of the trade mark protection sought on the basis of the application alone, the designation of goods and services should be sufficiently clear and precise.
Da bi pristojni organi in gospodarski subjekti lahko določili obseg varstva blagovne znamke samo na podlagi prijave, bi morala biti določitev blaga in storitev dovolj jasna in natančna.
The use of general terms should be interpreted as including only goods and services clearly covered by the literal meaning of a term.
Uporaba splošnih izrazov bi se morala razlagati tako, da vključujejo le blago in storitve, ki so nedvomno zajeti v dobesednem pomenu izraza.
In the interest of clarity and legal certainty, the Member States' central industrial property offices and the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property should, in cooperation with each other, endeavour to compile a list reflecting their respective administrative practices with regard to the classification of goods and services.
Zaradi jasnosti in pravne varnosti bi si morali glavni uradi držav članic za industrijsko lastnino in Urad Beneluksa za intelektualno lastnino v medsebojnem sodelovanju prizadevati za pripravo seznama, ki bi odražal njihove upravne prakse glede razvrstitve blaga in storitev.
For the purpose of ensuring effective trade mark protection, Member States should make available an efficient administrative opposition procedure, allowing at least the proprietor of earlier trade mark rights and any person authorised under the relevant law to exercise the rights arising from a protected designation of origin or a geographical indication to oppose the registration of a trade mark application.
Zaradi zagotavljanja učinkovitega varstva blagovne znamke bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da je na voljo učinkovit upravni postopek ugovora, ki bi vsaj imetniku pravic iz prejšnje blagovne znamke in vsaki osebi, ki je v skladu z zadevnim pravom pooblaščena za uveljavljanje pravic, ki izhajajo iz zaščitene označbe porekla ali geografske označbe, omogočil, da ugovarja registraciji prijave blagovne znamke.
Furthermore, in order to offer efficient means of revoking trademarks or declaring them invalid, Member States should provide for an administrative procedure for revocation or declaration of invalidity within the longer transposition period of seven years, after the entry into force of this Directive.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitih sredstev za razveljavitev blagovnih znamk ali ugotovitev njihove ničnosti bi morale države članice poleg tega zagotoviti upravni postopek za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti v daljšem obdobju prenosa, in sicer sedem let po začetku veljavnosti te direktive.
It is desirable that Member States' central industrial property offices and the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property cooperate with each other and with the European Union Intellectual Property Office in all fields of trade mark registration and administration in order to promote convergence of practices and tools, such as the creation and updating of common or connected databases and portals for consultation and search purposes.
Zaželeno je, da bi glavni uradi držav članic za industrijsko lastnino in Urad Beneluksa za intelektualno lastnino sodelovali med seboj ter z Uradom Evropske unije za intelektualno lastnino na vseh področjih registracije in upravljanja blagovnih znamk, da bi spodbudili približevanje praks in orodij, kot so oblikovanje in posodabljanje skupnih ali povezanih podatkovnih zbirk in portalov za posvetovanje in iskanje.
The Member States should further ensure that their offices cooperate with each other and with the European Union Intellectual Property Office in all other areas of their activities which are relevant for the protection of trade marks in the Union.
Države članice bi morale poleg tega zagotoviti, da bi njihovi uradi sodelovali med seboj in z Uradom Evropske unije za intelektualno lastnino na vseh drugih področjih njihovega delovanja, ki so povezana z varstvom blagovnih znamk v Uniji.
This Directive should not exclude the application to trade marks of provisions of law of the Member States other than trade mark law, such as provisions relating to unfair competition, civil liability or consumer protection.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela izključevati uporabe predpisov držav članic, ki ne sodijo v okvir prava blagovnih znamkah, kot so predpisi v zvezi z nelojalno konkurenco, civilnopravno odgovornostjo ali varstvom potrošnikov.
Member States are bound by the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (‘the Paris Convention’) and the TRIPS Agreement.
Države članice obvezujeta Pariška konvencija za varstvo industrijske lastnine (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Pariška konvencija) in Sporazum TRIPS.
It is necessary that this Directive be entirely consistent with that Convention and that Agreement.
Potrebno je, da je ta direktiva popolnoma skladna z določbami navedene konvencije in navedenega sporazuma.
The obligations of the Member States resulting from that Convention and that Agreement should not be affected by this Directive.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati na obveznosti držav članic, ki izhajajo iz navedene konvencije in navedenega sporazuma.
Where appropriate, the second paragraph of Article 351 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should apply.
Kjer je to primerno, bi bilo treba uporabiti drugi odstavek člena 351 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Since the objectives of this Directive, namely to foster and create a well-functioning internal market and to facilitate the registration, administration and protection of trade marks in the Union to the benefit of growth and competitiveness, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker ciljev te direktive, in sicer razviti in vzpostaviti dobro delujoč notranji trg ter olajšati registracijo, upravljanje in varstvo blagovnih znamk v Uniji v korist rasti in konkurence, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi njenega obsega in učinkov lažje dosežejo na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [7] governs the processing of personal data carried out in the Member States in the context of this Directive.
Direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7] ureja obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ki se izvaja v državah članicah v okviru te direktive.
The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [8] and delivered an opinion on 11 July 2013.
V skladu s členom 28(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8] je bilo opravljeno posvetovanje z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov, ki je mnenje izdal 11. julija 2013.
The obligation to transpose this Directive into national law should be confined to those provisions which represent a substantive amendment as compared with the earlier Directive.
Obveznost prenosa te direktive v nacionalno pravo bi morala biti omejena na tiste določbe, ki pomenijo vsebinsko spremembo v primerjavi s predhodno direktivo.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States under Directive 2008/95/EC relating to the time limit for transposition of Council Directive 89/104/EEC [9] into national law as set out in Part B of Annex I to Directive 2008/95/EC,
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v obveznosti držav članic na podlagi Direktive 2008/95/ES glede roka za prenos Direktive Sveta 89/104/EGS [9] v nacionalno pravo, kakor je določen v delu B Priloge I k Direktivi 2008/95/ES –
This Directive applies to every trade mark in respect of goods or services which is the subject of registration or of an application for registration in a Member State as an individual trade mark, a guarantee or certification mark or a collective mark, or which is the subject of a registration or an application for registration in the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property or of an international registration having effect in a Member State.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za vsako blagovno znamko v zvezi z blagom ali storitvami, ki je predmet registracije ali prijave za registracijo v državi članici kot posamična blagovna znamka, garancijska ali certifikacijska znamka ali kolektivna znamka, ali ki je predmet registracije ali prijave za registracijo v Uradu Beneluksa za intelektualno lastnino ali mednarodne registracije z učinkom v državi članici.
‘office’ means the central industrial property office of the Member State or the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property, entrusted with the registration of trade marks;
„urad“ pomeni glavni urad za industrijsko lastnino države članice ali Urad Beneluksa za intelektualno lastnino, pooblaščen za registracijo blagovnih znamk;
‘register’ means the register of trade marks kept by an office.
„register“ pomeni register blagovnih znamk, ki ga vodi urad.
SUBSTANTIVE LAW ON TRADE MARKS
MATERIALNO PRAVO BLAGOVNIH ZNAMK
A trade mark may consist of any signs, in particular words, including personal names, or designs, letters, numerals, colours, the shape of goods or of the packaging of goods, or sounds, provided that such signs are capable of:
Blagovna znamka je lahko sestavljena iz kakršnih koli znakov, zlasti iz besed, vključno z osebnimi imeni, ali iz slik, črk, števil, barv, oblike blaga ali njegove embalaže ali zvokov, če se:
distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings; and
lahko s temi znaki blago ali storitve določenega podjetja razlikujejo od blaga ali storitev drugih podjetij ter
being represented on the register in a manner which enables the competent authorities and the public to determine the clear and precise subject matter of the protection afforded to its proprietor.
ti znaki v registru lahko prikažejo na način, ki pristojnim organom in javnosti omogoči jasno in natančno določitev predmeta varstva, ki je zagotovljeno njihovemu imetniku.
Grounds for refusal or invalidity
Razlogi za zavrnitev ali ničnost
Absolute grounds for refusal or invalidity
Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev ali ničnost
The following shall not be registered or, if registered, shall be liable to be declared invalid:
Naslednje se ne registrira ali se, če je registrirano, ugotovi za nično:
trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, or the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of the goods or services;
blagovne znamke, ki jih sestavljajo izključno znaki ali označbe, ki lahko v gospodarskem prometu označujejo vrsto, kakovost, količino, namen, vrednost, geografsko poreklo ali čas proizvodnje blaga ali opravljanja storitev ali druge lastnosti blaga ali storitev;
the shape, or another characteristic, which results from the nature of the goods themselves;
oblike ali druge značilnosti, ki izhaja iz same narave blaga;
the shape, or another characteristic, of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result;
oblike ali druge značilnosti blaga, ki je nujna za dosego tehničnega učinka;
the shape, or another characteristic, which gives substantial value to the goods;
oblike ali druge značilnosti, ki blagu daje bistveno vrednost;
trade marks which are of such a nature as to deceive the public, for instance, as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of the goods or service;
blagovne znamke, katerih narava zavaja javnost, zlasti glede narave, kakovosti ali geografskega porekla blaga ali storitve;
trade marks which have not been authorised by the competent authorities and are to be refused or invalidated pursuant to Article 6ter of the Paris Convention;
blagovne znamke, za katere ni bilo izdano dovoljenje pristojnih organov in morajo biti zavrnjene ali razglašene za nične na podlagi člena 6ter Pariške konvencije;
trade marks which are excluded from registration pursuant to Union legislation or the national law of the Member State concerned, or to international agreements to which the Union or the Member State concerned is party, providing for protection of designations of origin and geographical indications;
blagovne znamke, ki so izključene iz registracije v skladu z zakonodajo Unije ali nacionalnim pravom zadevne države članice ali mednarodnimi sporazumi, katerih pogodbenica je Unija ali zadevna država članica, in ki zagotavljajo zaščito označb porekla in geografskih označb;
trade marks which are excluded from registration pursuant to Union legislation or international agreements to which the Union is party, providing for protection of traditional terms for wine;
blagovne znamke, ki so izključene iz registracije v skladu z zakonodajo Unije ali mednarodnimi sporazumi, katerih pogodbenica je Unija, in ki zagotavljajo zaščito tradicionalnih izrazov za vina;
trade marks which are excluded from registration pursuant to Union legislation or international agreements to which the Union is party, providing for protection of traditional specialities guaranteed;
blagovne znamke, ki so izključene iz registracije v skladu z zakonodajo Unije ali mednarodnimi sporazumi, katerih pogodbenica je Unija, in ki zagotavljajo zaščito zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnosti;
trade marks which consist of, or reproduce in their essential elements, an earlier plant variety denomination registered in accordance with Union legislation or the national law of the Member State concerned, or international agreements to which the Union or the Member State concerned is party, providing protection for plant variety rights, and which are in respect of plant varieties of the same or closely related species.
blagovne znamke, ki so sestavljene iz prejšnjega poimenovanja rastlinske sorte, registriranega v skladu z zakonodajo Unije ali nacionalnim pravom zadevne države članice ali mednarodnimi sporazumi, katerih pogodbenica je Unija ali zadevna država članica, o zaščiti žlahtniteljskih pravic, in se nanašajo na rastlinske sorte iste ali zelo sorodne vrste, ali vsebujejo bistvene elemente tega poimenovanja.
A trade mark shall be liable to be declared invalid where the application for registration of the trade mark was made in bad faith by the applicant.
Blagovna znamka se lahko ugotovi za nično, kadar prijavitelj vloži prijavo za registracijo blagovne znamke v slabi veri.
Any Member State may also provide that such a trade mark is not to be registered.
Država članica lahko tudi zagotovi, da se taka blagovna znamka ne registrira.
Any Member State may provide that a trade mark is not to be registered or, if registered, is liable to be declared invalid where and to the extent that:
Vsaka država članica lahko določi, da se blagovna znamka ne registrira ali da se jo, če je registrirana, lahko ugotovi za nično, če in v kolikor:
the use of that trade mark may be prohibited pursuant to provisions of law other than trade mark law of the Member State concerned or of the Union;
se lahko uporaba te blagovne znamke prepove v skladu s predpisi, ki ne sodijo v okvir prava blagovnih znamk zadevne države članice ali Unije;
the trade mark includes a sign of high symbolic value, in particular a religious symbol;
blagovna znamka vsebuje znak visoke simbolične vrednosti, zlasti verski simbol;
the trade mark includes badges, emblems and escutcheons other than those covered by Article 6ter of the Paris Convention and which are of public interest, unless the consent of the competent authority to their registration has been given in conformity with the law of the Member State.
blagovna znamka vsebuje znamenja, embleme in grbe, ki niso zajeti v členu 6ter Pariške konvencije in ki so v javnem interesu, razen če je bilo soglasje ustreznih organov k njeni registraciji dano v skladu s pravom države članice.
A trade mark shall not be refused registration in accordance with paragraph 1(b), (c) or (d) if, before the date of application for registration, following the use which has been made of it, it has acquired a distinctive character.
Registracija blagovne znamke se ne zavrne v skladu s točko (b), (c) ali (d) odstavka 1, če je pred datumom prijave za registracijo in z njeno uporabo pridobila razlikovalni značaj.
A trade mark shall not be declared invalid for the same reasons if, before the date of application for a declaration of invalidity, following the use which has been made of it, it has acquired a distinctive character.
Registracija blagovne znamke se ne ugotovi za nično iz istih razlogov, če je pred datumom vložitve zahteve za ugotovitev ničnosti in z njeno uporabo pridobila razlikovalni značaj.
Any Member State may provide that paragraph 4 is also to apply where the distinctive character was acquired after the date of application for registration but before the date of registration.
Vsaka država članica lahko določi, da se odstavek 4 uporablja tudi, če je blagovna znamka pridobila razlikovalni značaj po datumu vložitve prijave za registracijo, vendar pred datumom registracije.
Relative grounds for refusal or invalidity
Relativni razlogi za zavrnitev ali ničnost
A trade mark shall not be registered or, if registered, shall be liable to be declared invalid where:
Blagovna znamka se ne registrira ali, če je registrirana, se jo ugotovi za nično, če:
it is identical with an earlier trade mark, and the goods or services for which the trade mark is applied for or is registered are identical with the goods or services for which the earlier trade mark is protected;
je enaka prejšnji blagovni znamki in so blago ali storitve, za katere se blagovna znamka uporablja oziroma je zanje registrirana, enaki blagu ali storitvam, za katere je varovana prejšnja blagovna znamka;
because of its identity with, or similarity to, the earlier trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade marks, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public; the likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark.
zaradi enakosti ali podobnosti s prejšnjo blagovno znamko in enakosti ali podobnosti blaga ali storitev, označenih z blagovnimi znamkami, obstaja verjetnost zmede v javnosti, pri čemer verjetnost zmede vključuje verjetnost povezovanja s prejšnjo blagovno znamko.
trade marks of the following kinds with a date of application for registration which is earlier than the date of application for registration of the trade mark, taking account, where appropriate, of the priorities claimed in respect of those trade marks:
naslednje vrste blagovnih znamk z datumom vložitve prijave za registracijo, ki je pred datumom prijave za registracijo blagovne znamke, ter, kadar je to primerno, ob upoštevanju prednostnih pravic, ki se zahtevajo v zvezi s temi blagovnimi znamkami:
EU trade marks;
blagovne znamke EU;
trade marks registered in the Member State concerned or, in the case of Belgium, Luxembourg or the Netherlands, at the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property;
blagovne znamke, registrirane v zadevni državi članici, ali, v primeru Belgije, Luksemburga ali Nizozemske, na Uradu Beneluksa za intelektualno lastnino;
trade marks registered under international arrangements which have effect in the Member State concerned;
blagovne znamke, registrirane na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov, ki učinkujejo v zadevni državi članici;
EU trade marks which validly claim seniority, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, of a trade mark referred to in points (a)(ii) and (iii), even when the latter trade mark has been surrendered or allowed to lapse;
blagovne znamke EU, za katere se v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 207/2009 upravičeno zahteva prednost starejše blagovne znamke iz točk (a)(ii) in (iii), tudi če se tej blagovni znamki odpove ali se dopusti, da njena registracija poteče;
trade marks which, on the date of application for registration of the trade mark, or, where appropriate, of the priority claimed in respect of the application for registration of the trade mark, are well known in the Member State concerned, in the sense in which the words ‘well-known’ are used in Article 6bis of the Paris Convention.
blagovne znamke, ki so na dan vložitve prijave za registracijo blagovne znamke ali, kadar je to primerno, zahteve za priznanje prednosti v zvezi s prijavo za registracijo blagovne znamke, v zadevni državi članici znane v pomenu izraza „znane“ iz člena 6bis Pariške konvencije.
Furthermore, a trade mark shall not be registered or, if registered, shall be liable to be declared invalid where:
Poleg tega se blagovna znamka ne registrira ali se jo, če je registrirana, lahko ugotovi za nično, če: