natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See also the sixth sentence of Section 22, paragraph 1 MFG with reference to the ‘powers’ of the Land governments (and the possibility to delegate tasks to the obersten Landesbehörden) and the second paragraph of Section 23 MFG, according to which levies shall be recovered pursuant to the provisions of the Abgabenordnung, which in turn requires issuing a tax act or similar administrative act (cf.
1).
Sections 122 and 251 AO).
Nemčija je na vprašanja Komisije odgovorila z dopisoma z dne 16. januarja 2012 in z dne 27. aprila 2012.
According to the third paragraph of Section 14 MFG no tasks incumbent on the State must be conferred to the respective Landesvereinigung.
Glede na odgovore Nemčije je bilo ugotovljeno, da je Nemčija nemškemu sektorju mleka odobrila finančno podporo v skladu z Zakonom o mleku in maščobah iz leta 1952 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „Zakon o mleku in maščobah“ ali „MFG“).
For Baden-Württemberg: Regulation on the charging of levies in respect of the dairy industry of 18 May 2004 (GBl. p. 350), replaced by the Regulation of the Ministry of Rural Affairs and Consumer Protection of 14 February 2013 repealing the Regulation on the charging of levies in respect of the dairy industry.For Bavaria: Regulation on a levy for milk (BayMilchUmlV) of 17 October 2007 (GVBl 2007, p. 727), as last amended by Regulation of 29 November 2012.
MFG je zvezni zakon, ki je začel veljati leta 1952 in je bil od takrat večkrat spremenjen, nazadnje 31. oktobra 2006.
See Judgment of the Court of 13 March 2001, PreussenElektra, C-379/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:160, paragraphs 7 and 8; Judgment of the Court of 16 July 2014, Greece v Commission, T-52/12, ECLI:EU:T:2014:67,7, paragraphs 119 and 120. for the purposes of distinguishing from PreussenElektra, see judgment of the Court of 11 December 2014, Austria v Commission, T-251/11, ECLI:EU:T:2014:1060, paragraphs 56-71 and 82.
Ta zakon je pravni okvir za zadevne ukrepe pomoči in je časovno neomejen.
See, inter alia, Decision SA.35932 (2013/N) Netherlands — Cultivation matters fund, recitals 31 to 35.
Prevzem stroškov za redna preverjanja kakovosti mleka je po navedbah Nemčije tudi v obdobju 2001–2006 popolnoma zakonit.
Judgment of the Court of 30 May 2013, Doux Élevage SNC et Coopérative agricole GBP-ARREE v Ministère de l'Agriculture, C-677/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, paragraph 40.
Pri preverjanjih, ki jih izvajata združenji Milchprüfring Bayern e.V.
Judgment of the Court of 30 May 2013, Doux Élevage SNC et Coopérative agricole GBP-ARREE v Ministère de l'Agriculture, C-677/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, paragraph 31.
(Morebitna) shema državne pomoči od leta 1958 ni bila bistveno spremenjena.
Judgment of the Court of 30 May 2013, Doux Élevage SNC et Coopérative agricole GBP-ARREE v Ministère de l'Agriculture, C-677/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, paragraph 32.
Zlasti člen 22(2) MFG, na katerem temeljijo zadevni ukrepi, je bil le minimalno spremenjen, točka 1, ki je upoštevna tukaj, pa je popolnoma nespremenjena.
See, for example, Section 5 of the Regulation on a levy for milk (BayMilchUmlV) of 17 October 2007.
Padajoče stopnje dajatev ne morejo vplivati na združljivost sheme državne pomoči.
See Judgment of the Court of 11 September 2014, Commission/Germany,C-527/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2193, paragraphs 41 and 56.
Izkušnja je „pokazala, da je treba te pomoči ohraniti tam, kjer resnično pripomorejo k ohranjanju in izboljšanju genske kakovosti živine“.
Judgment of the Court of 30 May 2013, Doux Élevage SNC et Coopérative agricole GBP-ARREE v Ministère de l'Agriculture, C-677/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, paragraphs, 32, 35 and 38.
Uvedba inovativnih živinorejskih tehnik bi bila s tem združljiva, spodbujanje reje vzrejnih živali pa ne.
See Judgment of the Court of 25 March 2015, Belgium/Commission, T-538/11, point 96, ECLI:EU:T:2015:188, according to which the fact that undertakings are burdened with charges under national law that inevitably relates to the exercising of public power by the Member State, does not rule out any qualification of these charges as ‘charges that normally have to be borne by the undertaking’.
Deželno združenje sektorja za mleko Niedersachsen е.
OJ C 8, 11.1.2012, p. 4.
V.
See Judgment of the Court of 6 September 2006, Portugal/Commission, C-88/03, ECLI:EU:C:2006:511.
(LVN) se v svojem dopisu z dne 7. februarja 2014 ni neposredno opredelilo glede pomoči, dodeljenih za preskuse kakovosti mleka, vendar je načeloma zanikalo obstoj pomoči za vse podukrepe v skladu z MFG.
Judgment of the Court of 6 september 2006, Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission, 730/79, ECLI:EU:C:1980:209, paragraphs 11 – 12.
Predloge za uporabo, ki so jih pripravila deželna združenja, sicer „določi“ (tako v Spodnji Saški v skladu s točko 6.2 Direktive o pomoči in v Turingiji v skladu s členom 4 turinške uredbe UmlErhVO) ali „odobri“ oz. „dovoli“ (tako v Severnem Porenju-Vestfaliji in na Bavarskem) državni organ.
See, in particular, the Judgment of the Court of 13 July 1988 French Republic v Commission, 102/87, ECLI:EU:C:1988:391.
Vendar to še ne pomeni odločilnega državnega vpliva, kajti merilo za državno „preverjanje“ so zgolj merila iz člena 22(2) MFG.
Judgment of the Court of 14 January 2015, Eventech Ltd v Parking Adjudicator, C-518/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:9, paragraph 67.
S tem se pristojnost za usmerjanje dodelitve denarnih sredstev ali vpliv nanjo z ustreznimi shemami ne prenaša na državne organe nič bolj kot v zadevi Doux Elevage [25].
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2012 of 9 October 2012 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff' (OJ L 304, 31.10.2012, p. 1).
Nazorno je dokumentiran položaj v zvezni deželi Turingiji, v kateri je bilo deželno združenje priznano šele leta 1999.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2433
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/2433
amending Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU as regards the animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States
o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/709/EU glede nadzornih ukrepov za zdravje živali v zvezi z afriško prašičjo kugo v nekaterih državah članicah
(notified under document C(2015) 9168)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2015) 9168)
Commission Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU [4] lays down animal health control measures in relation to African swine fever in the Member States or areas thereof listed in the Annex thereto (‘the concerned Member States’).
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2014/709/EU [4] določa nadzorne ukrepe za zdravje živali v zvezi z afriško prašičjo kugo v državah članicah ali na njihovih območjih, ki so navedena v Prilogi k navedenemu sklepu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevne države članice).
Those measures include prohibitions on the dispatch of live pigs, porcine semen, ova and embryo, pig meat, pig meat preparations, pig meat products and any other products containing pig meat, as well as consignments of animal by-products from porcine animals, from certain areas of the concerned Member States (‘the commodities’).
Navedeni ukrepi vključujejo prepoved odpreme živih prašičev, semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov prašičev, prašičjega mesa, pripravkov in proizvodov iz prašičjega mesa ter vseh drugih proizvodov, ki vsebujejo prašičje meso, ter pošiljk živalskih stranskih proizvodov iz prašičev z določenih območij zadevnih držav članic (v nadaljnjem besedilu: proizvodi).
That Annex demarcates and lists those areas to take account of the level of risk based on the epidemiological situation in the concerned Member States.
V navedeni prilogi so navedena tista območja in njihova razmejitev, da se upošteva stopnja tveganja na podlagi epidemioloških razmer v zadevni državi članici.
In order to adapt the animal health control measures laid down in Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU to the evolution of the epidemiological situation in the different areas of the Member States concerned, and to take account of the different risk levels depending on the type of commodities, it is appropriate to provide for certain derogations for certain types of commodities originating from the areas listed in the different Parts of the Annex to that Implementing Decision.
Za prilagoditev nadzornih ukrepov za zdravje živali iz Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/709/EU razvoju epidemioloških razmer na različnih območjih zadevnih držav članic in za upoštevanje različnih stopenj tveganja glede na vrsto proizvodov je primerno, da se določijo nekatera odstopanja za nekatere vrste proizvodov s poreklom z območij, navedenih v različnih delih Priloge k navedenemu izvedbenemu sklepu.
Those derogations should also be in line with the risk mitigation measures for importation as regards African swine fever indicated in the Terrestrial Animal Health Code of the World Organisation for Animal Health [5].
Navedena odstopanja bi morala biti prav tako skladna z ukrepi iz Zoosanitarnega kodeksa za kopenske živali Mednarodne organizacije za zdravje živali [5] za zmanjšanje tveganja za afriško prašičjo kugo pri uvozu.
The additional safeguard measures and animal health requirements applicable, in case such derogations are granted, should also be described in that Implementing Decision.
V navedenem izvedbenem sklepu bi bilo treba opisati tudi dodatne zaščitne ukrepe in zahteve za zdravje živali, ki se uporabljajo, če so odobrena taka odstopanja.
The prohibition on the dispatch of live pigs from the areas listed in Part III of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU is particularly stringent and may therefore lead to logistic and animal welfare problems where the slaughtering of pigs in the respective areas is not possible, in particular due to the absence of an appropriate slaughterhouse or limitations in slaughtering capacity within the relevant areas listed in Part III of that Annex either within the same Member State or in the territory of another Member State listed in the Annex.
Prepoved odpreme živih prašičev z območij, navedenih v delu III Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU, je še posebej stroga in bi zato lahko privedla do logističnih težav in težav v zvezi z dobrobitjo živali, kadar zakol prašičev na zadevnih območjih ni mogoč, zlasti kadar ni ustreznih klavnic ali zaradi omejitev zmogljivosti za zakol na ustreznih območjih, navedenih v delu III navedene priloge, bodisi znotraj iste države članice ali na ozemlju druge države članice, navedene v Prilogi.
It is therefore appropriate that when the circumstances described in recital 3 occur, the Member States concerned may exceptionally grant derogations for the dispatch of live pigs from the areas listed in Part III of the Annex for immediate slaughter to a slaughterhouse located outside that area in the same Member State or in the territory of another Member State listed in the Annex provided that risk mitigating measures are met in order not to jeopardise disease control.
Zato je primerno, da lahko pri spletu okoliščin, opisanih v uvodni izjavi 3, zadevne države članice izjemoma odobrijo odstopanja za odpremo živih prašičev z območij, navedenih v delu III Priloge, za takojšnji zakol v klavnici zunaj navedenega območja v isti državi članici ali na ozemlju druge države članice, navedene v Prilogi, če se izvajajo ukrepi za zmanjšanje tveganja, da se ne bi ogrozil nadzor bolezni.
In terms of the risk of the spread of African swine fever, movements of different porcine commodities pose different levels of risk.
Kar se tiče tveganja širjenja afriške prašičje kuge, pomenijo premiki različnih proizvodov iz prašičev različne stopnje tveganja.
As a general rule, the movement of porcine semen from restricted areas poses significant risks in terms of exposure and consequences.
Praviloma premik semena prašičev z omejenih območij predstavlja veliko tveganje v smislu izpostavljenosti in posledic.
However, the application of additional risk mitigating measures, such as testing and increased biosecurity, can allow for derogations for semen collected in the areas listed in Parts II and III of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU.
Vendar se z uporabo dodatnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje tveganja, kot so testiranje in večja biološka zaščita, lahko dovolijo odstopanja za seme, odvzeto na območjih, navedenih v delih II in III Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU.
Article 9 of that Implementing Decision should therefore be amended.
Člen 9 navedenega izvedbenega sklepa bi bilo zato treba spremeniti.
The derogations for the dispatch of certain live pigs from the areas listed in Parts II and III of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU to other areas listed in Part II or III of that Annex of another Member State with a similar disease status are justified provided that specific risk mitigating measures are applied.
Odstopanja za odpremo nekaterih živih prašičev z območij, navedenih v delih II in III Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU, na druga območja druge države članice s podobnim statusom bolezni, navedena v delih II in III navedene priloge, so upravičena pod pogojem, da se uporabijo posebni ukrepi za zmanjšanje tveganja.
The flexibility provided by these new measures is important in order to ensure proper implementation of the measures in a medium and long term perspective.
Prožnost, ki jo zagotavljajo ti novi ukrepi, je pomembna za zagotovitev ustreznega izvajanja ukrepov na srednji in dolgi rok.
This requires the establishment of a safe channelling procedure under the strict control of the competent authorities of the Member State of transit and destination.
To zahteva vzpostavitev varnega postopka usmerjanja pod strogim nadzorom pristojnih organov države članice tranzita in namembne države članice.
Articles 3 and 4 of that Implementing Decision should therefore be amended.
Člena 3 in 4 navedenega izvedbenega sklepa bi bilo zato treba spremeniti.
As an additional risk mitigating measure, a channelling procedure should be in place in order to isolate animals coming from areas with a higher risk for African swine fever.
Kot dodaten ukrep za zmanjšanje tveganja bi se moral izvajati postopek usmerjanja za izolacijo živali, ki prihajajo z območij z višjo stopnjo tveganja za afriško prašičjo kugo.
It is therefore necessary to clarify and specify the procedures for the dispatch, transit and delivery of live pigs.
Zato je treba razjasniti in podrobno opredeliti postopke za odpremo, tranzit in dostavo živih prašičev.
The derogations provided for in Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU for the dispatch of live pigs and semen between areas with a comparable risk for African swine fever should only be applied when approved by the competent authorities of the Member States of transit and destination, prior to such movement.
Odstopanja, določena v Izvedbenem sklepu 2014/709/EU za odpremo živih prašičev in semena med območji s primerljivim tveganjem za afriško prašičjo kugo, bi se morala uporabljati le, če so jih pred takim premikom odobrili pristojni organi države članice tranzita in namembne države članice.
Council Directive 64/432/EEC [6] provides that health certificates are to accompany the movements of live animals.
Direktiva Sveta 64/432/EGS [6] določa, da morajo živali pri premikih spremljati zdravstvena spričevala.
Where derogations from the prohibition on the dispatch of live pigs from the areas listed in the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU are applied to live pigs intended for intra-Union trade, those health certificates should include a reference to that Implementing Decision so as to ensure that adequate and accurate health information is provided in the relevant certificates.
Če se odstopanja od prepovedi odpreme živih prašičev z območij, navedenih v Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU, uporabljajo za žive prašiče, namenjene za trgovino znotraj Unije, bi morala navedena zdravstvena spričevala vključevati sklicevanje na navedeni izvedbeni sklep, da se v ustreznih spričevalih zagotovijo primerne in točne zdravstvene informacije.
The period of application of the animal health control measures provided for in Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU should take account of the epidemiology of African swine fever and the conditions required to regain disease-free status for African swine fever in accordance with the Terrestrial Animal Health Code of the World Organisation for Animal Health.
Pri določitvi obdobja uporabe nadzornih ukrepov za zdravje živali iz Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/709/EU bi bilo treba upoštevati epidemiologijo afriške prašičje kuge in pogoje za ponovno pridobitev statusa brez bolezni za afriško prašičjo kugo v skladu z Zoosanitarnim kodeksom za kopenske živali Mednarodne organizacije za zdravje živali.
Therefore, the period of application of Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU should be extended until 31 December 2019.
Obdobje uporabe Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/709/EU bi bilo zato treba podaljšati do 31. decembra 2019.
These cases are located in close proximity to the areas listed in Part I of that Annex.
Pri oceni tveganja, ki ga predstavlja zdravstveno stanje živali v Estoniji, Latviji in na Poljskem, bi bilo treba upoštevati razvoj trenutnih epidemioloških razmer v Uniji v zvezi z afriško prašičjo kugo.
African swine fever has never been reported in the most Northern areas in Poland currently listed in Part II of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU.
Da bi osredotočili nadzorne ukrepe za zdravje živali, preprečili nadaljnje širjenje afriške prašičje kuge, preprečili morebitne nepotrebne motnje za trgovino v Uniji in se izognili neupravičenim omejitvam trgovine v tretjih državah, bi bilo treba seznam Unije z območji, za katera veljajo nadzorni ukrepi za zdravje živali, iz delov I in II Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/709/EU spremeniti, da se upošteva trenutno zdravstveno stanje živali v zvezi z navedeno boleznijo v navedenih treh državah članicah.
The evolution of the current epidemiological situation in the Union as regards African swine fever should be considered in the assessment of the risk represented by the animal health situation as regards that disease in Estonia, Latvia and Poland.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo –
In order to focus animal health control measures and to prevent the further spread of African swine fever, as well as to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade by third countries, the Union list of areas subject to the animal health control measures set out in Parts I and II of the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU should be amended to take into account the current animal health situation as regards that disease in those three Member States.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Izvedbeni sklep 2014/709/EU se spremeni:
Article 1
člen 3 se spremeni:
Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU is amended as follows:
uvodni stavek se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 3 is amended as follows:
„Z odstopanjem od prepovedi iz točke (a) člena 2 lahko zadevne države članice dovolijo odpremo živih prašičev z gospodarstva, ki se nahaja na območjih iz dela II Priloge, na druga območja na ozemlju iste države članice ali na območja druge države članice, navedena v delih II ali III Priloge, pod pogojem, da:“
the introductory phrase is replaced by the following:
doda se naslednja točka 4:
‘By way of derogation from the prohibition provided for in point (a) of Article 2, the Member States concerned may authorise the dispatch of live pigs from a holding located in the areas listed in Part II of the Annex to other areas in the territory of the same Member State or to areas listed in Part II or III of the Annex of another Member State provided that:’;
Za žive prašiče, odpremljene na območja druge države članice, navedena v delih II ali III Priloge, veljajo naslednje dodatne zahteve:
the following point 4 is added:
prašiči izpolnjujejo katera koli druga ustrezna jamstva za zdravje živali na podlagi pozitivnega rezultata ocene tveganja ukrepov proti širjenju afriške prašičje kuge, ki jih je pred premikom teh živali zahteval pristojni organ države članice, v kateri je kraj izvora, in sta jih odobrila pristojni organ države članice, v kateri je kraj tranzita, in pristojni organ države članice, v kateri je namembni kraj;
For live pigs dispatched to areas listed in Part II or III of the Annex of another Member State, the following additional requirements shall apply:
država članica izvora Komisijo in druge države članice takoj obvesti o jamstvih za zdravje živali in odobritvi iz točke (a), ki jo izdajo pristojni organi;
the pigs comply with any other appropriate animal health guarantees based on a positive outcome of a risk assessment of measures against the spread of African swine fever required by the competent authority of the Member State of the place of origin and approved by the competent authority of the Member State of the place of transit and the competent authority of the Member State of destination, prior to the movement of such animals;
pod nadzorom pristojnih organov države članice izvora, držav članic tranzita in namembne države članice se vzpostavi postopek usmerjanja v skladu s členom 16a za zagotovitev, da se živali, ki se premikajo v skladu z dodatnimi zahtevami iz točke (a), prepeljejo na varen način ter se ne premikajo naprej v drugo državo članico.
the Member State of origin immediately informs the Commission and the other Member States of the animal health guarantees and the approval by the competent authorities referred to in point (a);
Za žive prašiče, ki izpolnjujejo dodatne zahteve iz točke 4 tega člena, se k ustreznemu zdravstvenemu spričevalu za prašiče iz člena 5(1) Direktive 64/432/EGS doda naslednje besedilo:
a channelling procedure in accordance with Article 16a is set up, under the control of the competent authorities of the Member States of origin, transit and destination, in order to ensure that the animals, moved in accordance with the additional requirements provided for in point (a) are transported in a safe manner and are not subsequently moved to another Member State.
‚Prašiči izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 3 Izvedbenega sklepa Komisije 2014/709/EU.‘“.
For live pigs that comply with the additional requirements of point 4 of this Article, the following additional wording shall be added to the corresponding health certificate for swine referred to in Article 5(1) of Directive 64/432/EEC:
vstavi se naslednji člen 3a:
“Pigs in compliance with Article 3 of Commission Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU.”’;
„Člen 3a
the following Article 3a is inserted:
Odstopanje od prepovedi odpreme živih prašičev z območij, navedenih v delu III Priloge
‘Article 3a
Z odstopanjem od prepovedi iz točke (a) člena 2 lahko zadevne države članice dovolijo odpremo živih prašičev z območij, navedenih v delu III Priloge, na druga območja na ozemlju iste države članice, navedena v delu II Priloge, ali na območja druge države članice, navedena v delih II ali III Priloge, pod pogojem, da:
Derogation from the prohibition on the dispatch of live pigs from the areas listed in Part III of the Annex
so prašiči z gospodarstva z ustrezno stopnjo biološke zaščite, ki jo je odobril pristojni organ, je gospodarstvo pod nadzorom pristojnega organa, prašiči pa izpolnjujejo zahteve iz odstavka 1 člena 3 in bodisi odstavku 2 ali odstavku 3 člena 3;
By way of derogation from the prohibition provided for in point (a) of Article 2, the Member States concerned may authorise the dispatch of live pigs from the areas listed in Part III of the Annex to other areas listed in Parts II in the territory of the same Member State or to areas listed in Part II or III of the Annex of another Member State, provided that:
se prašiči nahajajo v središču območja s polmerom najmanj tri kilometre, na katerem vse živali v gospodarstvih izpolnjujejo zahteve iz odstavka 1 člena 3 in bodisi odstavka 2 ali odstavka 3 člena 3;
the pigs are from a holding with an appropriate level of biosecurity approved by the competent authority, the holding is under the supervision of the competent authority, and the pigs comply with the requirements laid down in point 1 of Article 3 and in either point 2 or point 3 of Article 3;
pristojni organ gospodarstva odpreme mora pravočasno obvestiti pristojni organ namembnega gospodarstva glede namena o napotitvi prašičev, pristojni organ namembnega gospodarstva pa mora pristojni organ gospodarstva odpreme obvestiti o prispetju prašičev;