natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On that basis, the reported domestic sales were found to include around 40 % of sales which were exported.
Na tej podlagi se je ugotovilo, da je sporočena domača prodaja vključevala približno 40 % prodaje, ki je bila izvožena.
As regards the consideration described in recital 53 above of total statistical imports as being further fully exported, the exporting producer did not present any evidence to prove so.
Proizvajalec izvoznik ni predložil dokaza, s katerim bi podprl premislek iz uvodne izjave 53 zgoraj o tem, da bi bilo treba skupni uvoz glede na statistko šteti kot v celoti namenjen nadaljnjemu izvozu.
Normally, imports for re-export are falling within a special customs regime and are not considered in trade statistics as genuine exports.
Običajno uvoz, namenjen ponovnemu izvozu, spada v poseben carinski postopek in se v trgovinski statistiki ne šteje za pravi izvoz.
The Commission therefore cannot draw any useful conclusion from this claim.
Komisija zato na podlagi te trditve ne more sprejeti nobenega uporabnega sklepa.
Furthermore, two exporting producers claimed that the level of domestic sales not taken into account by the Commission was not proportionate to the percentage stated in recital 52 above.
Nadalje sta dva proizvajalca izvoznika trdila, da stopnja domače prodaje, ki je Komisija ni upoštevala, ni bila sorazmerna z odstotki iz uvodne izjave 52 zgoraj.
They reiterated their claim that the destination of the sales of their domestic customers was not known to them.
Ponovno sta zatrdila, da nista poznala namembnega kraja prodaje svojih domačih strank.
The Commission considers that lack of knowledge about the final destination of a sale is not decisive.
Po mnenju Komisije nepoznavanje končnega namembnega kraja prodaje ni odločilnega pomena.
The Commission analysed again the situation on the basis of the evidence available in the current investigation and revised the sales to be excluded from the normal value determination accordingly in order to reflect as accurately as possible the individual situation of the exporting producers investigated.
Komisija je znova analizirala stanje na podlagi dokazov, ki jih je imela v trenutni preiskavi na voljo, in pregledala prodajo, ki naj bi se skladno s tem izključila iz določitve normalne vrednosti, da bi čim natančneje izražala posamezni položaj proizvajalcev izvoznikov v preiskavi.
When warranted, some of the sales that had been excluded at provisional stage for the purposes of the normal value calculation were used in the normal value calculation.
Kadar je bilo to upravičeno, so bile pri izračunu normalne vrednosti uporabljene nekatere od prodaj, ki so bile v začasni fazi iz tega izračuna izključene.
An interested party challenged the inclusion of domestic sales to traders and distributors for the determination of the normal value.
Zainteresirana stran je izrazila dvom glede tega, da bi se v določitev normalne vrednosti vključila domača prodaja trgovcem in distributerjem.
Arguments to that effect were presented in written comments and during the hearing held before the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings on 7 July 2015.
Utemeljitve v zvezi s tem so bile predstavljene v pisnih pripombah in med zaslišanjem pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih 7. julija 2015.
As set out in recital 56 above, after the imposition of the provisional measures, the Commission continued examining the actual classification of the sales to distributors in view of reaching a more accurate and legally correct classification as domestic or as export sales for the purposes of the determination of the normal value, no longer relying on the presumption that all sales to distributors were destined for export.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 56 zgoraj, je Komisija po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov še naprej preiskovala dejansko razvrstitev prodaje distributerjem, da bi se prodaja natančneje in pravno ustrezneje razvrstila v domačo ali tujo prodajo za določitev normalne vrednosti, pri čemer se ni več zanašala na domnevo, da je vsa prodaja distributerjem namenjena izvozu.
Comments received after the provisional disclosure were considered and further details were taken into account.
Proučila je pripombe, prejete po začasnem razkritju, in upoštevala dodatne podrobnosti.
Instead of excluding sales to distributors as a whole on the basis of the presumption that all sales to distributors were destined for export, the Commission excluded only those sales to the distributor for which there was sufficient objective evidence that they were actually exported.
Namesto da bi Komisija izključila celotno prodajo distributerjem na podlagi domneve, da je bila vsa prodaja distributerjem namenjena izvozu, je izključila le tisto prodajo distributerjem, za katero je imela dovolj objektivnih dokazov o njenem dejanskem izvozu.
The Commission examined the reported sales at issue and classified them as domestic or for export on the basis of the specific situation and data of each of the exporting producers concerned.
Proučila je zadevno sporočeno prodajo in jo razvrstila v domačo ali namenjeno za izvoz na podlagi posebnega položaja in podatkov za vsakega od zadevnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The existence of export-oriented discounts was for example used as relevant evidence.
Kot ustrezen dokaz je, na primer, uporabila obstoj popustov za izvoz.
To the contrary, subjective elements such as intention or knowledge, or lack thereof, did not play any role in the objective assessment made by the Commission.
Pri objektivni oceni Komisije pa nasprotno niso imeli nobene vloge subjektivni elementi, kot sta namera ali znanje ali pomanjkanje obojega.
One exporting producer contested rejection of certain scrap deduction from the cost of production.
En izvoznik proizvajalec je nasprotoval zavrnitvi odštetja določene vrednosti odpadkov od stroškov proizvodnje.
To support its claim it submitted additional information showing the production loss as conversion cost in its cost of production table.
Svojo trditev je podkrepil z dodatnimi informacijami, ki so izgubo proizvodnje v njegovi preglednici stroškov proizvodnje prikazovale kot strošek preusmeritve.
According to its claim, the production loss is the total of the material cost not converted into final product, plus the manufacturing overheads allocated to the production loss.
Trdil je, da je izguba proizvodnje seštevek materialnih stroškov, ki niso bili spremenjeni v končni izdelek, k čemur se prištejejo splošni proizvodni stroški, dodeljeni za izgubo proizvodnje.
The Commission examined carefully its claim but found the material cost included in the production loss far below the amount claimed as scrap deduction.
Komisija je pazljivo proučila njegovo trditev, vendar je ugotovila, da so materialni stroški, vključeni v izgubo proizvodnje, precej nižji od zneska, za katerega je trdil, da pomeni odštetje vrednosti odpadkov.
After the final disclosure the company reiterated its claim that the scrap value should be compared to the total loss value, including the manufacturing overheads allocated to it.
Družba je po dokončnem razkritju ponovila svojo trditev, da bi bilo treba vrednost odpadkov primerjati z vrednostjo skupne izgube, vključno s splošnimi proizvodnimi stroški, dodeljenimi zanjo.
The Commission maintains its position that the scrap market value cannot be higher than the input material.
Komisija vztraja pri svojem stališču, da tržna vrednost odpadkov ne more biti višja od vhodne surovine.
The claim of the exporting producer has thus to be rejected.
Zato je treba trditev proizvajalca izvoznika zavrniti.
In addition, the exporting producer did not substantiate its claim regarding the rejection of certain scrap deduction by providing the actual quantity of material consumed in the production of the product concerned that would allow the Commission to assess the loss.
Proizvajalec izvoznik poleg tega ni podkrepil svoje trditve glede zavrnitve odštetja določene vrednosti odpadkov z navedbo dejanske količine materiala, porabljenega pri proizvodnji zadevnega izdelka, zaradi česar bi lahko Komisija ocenila izgubo.
The company claimed that the consumption quantity and value for each type of raw material input was given in the worksheets submitted during the course of the on-site verification.
Družba je trdila, da je količino in vrednost potrošnje posamezne vrste vhodne surovine predložila na delovnih listih, ki jih je poslala med preverjanjem na kraju samem.
The Commission found that this data covered more than the product concerned such as hot rolled coil transformed and sold as intermediate products.
Komisija je ugotovila, da so ti podatki obsegali več kot le zadevni izdelek, na primer vroče valjane kolobarje, preoblikovane in prodajane kot vmesni izdelek.
This does not allow the Commission to verify the material losses converted into scrap.
Zato ne more preveriti materialnih izgub, vključenih med odpadke.
As the losses and the scrap have only been reported in values, it was impossible to consider, whether the material consumption for the production of the product concerned was sufficient to produce both the product concerned and the scrap, deducted from the cost of production.
Ker se je o izgubah in odpadkih poročalo le v vrednostih, ni bilo mogoče proučiti, ali je poraba materiala za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka zadostovala za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka in odpadkov, ki so se odšteli od stroškov proizvodnje.
Therefore, it was not possible to reliably establish whether the reported loss included any material cost as claimed and what the amount of scrap deduction could be.
Zato ni bilo mogoče zanesljivo ugotoviti, ali so v izgubo, o kateri se je poročalo, vključeni kakršni koli materialni stroški, kot je trdila družba, in koliko bi lahko znašala odšteta vrednost odpadkov.
The exporting producer repeated its claim after the final disclosure, without bringing to light any new facts.
Po dokončnem razkritju je proizvajalec izvoznik ponovil svojo trditev, pri čemer ni razkril nobenih novih dejstev.
The provisional findings in recitals 62 and 67 to 78 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Zato se potrdijo začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 62 in od 67 do 78 začasne uredbe.
In its comments both after provisional and final disclosure one exporting producer contested the exclusion of certain export sales to the Union, which were reported based on the export certificates submitted by its customers.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je v svojih pripombah po začasnem in dokončnem razkritju nasprotoval izključitvi določenega izvoza v Unijo, o katerem se je poročalo na podlagi izvoznih potrdil, ki so jih predložile njegove stranke.
The export certificates however neither allow identifying the producer nor the sales transaction reported by the exporting producer.
Z izvoznimi potrdili pa ni mogoče identificirati niti proizvajalca niti prodajne transakcije, o kateri je poročal proizvajalec izvoznik.
In addition, the export certificates were not collected consistently from all customers throughout the investigation period.
Poleg tega se v celotnem obdobju preiskave niso dosledno zbirala izvozna potrdila od vseh strank.
Despite the great efforts by the exporting producer the destination of the sales provided was not verifiable and in any event it did not cover the entire investigation period.
Kljub precejšnjim prizadevanjem proizvajalca izvoznika navedenega namembnega kraja prodaje ni bilo mogoče preveriti in vsekakor ni zajemal celotnega obdobja preiskave.
The Commission therefore could not reliably determine that those sales were export sales for the purposes of the dumping margin calculation.
Komisija zato pri izračunu stopnje dampinga ni mogla zanesljivo določiti, da je bila navedena prodaja izvoz.
The claim is thus rejected.
Zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
One exporting producer requested an allowance for foreign exchange rate using the rate of the liability settlement day.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je zahteval popravek menjalnega tečaja, tako da bi se uporabila stopnja, ki je veljala na dan poravnave obveznosti.
To be able to do a comparison under Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, monthly exchange rates of the European Central Bank were consistently used for all exporting producers in Taiwan.
Da bi se omogočila primerjava v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe, so se za vse proizvajalce izvoznike na Tajvanu sistematično uporabljali mesečni menjalni tečaji Evropske centralne banke.
The approach requested by the exporting producer would not be in line with the basic Regulation, which requires usage of the exchange rate applicable on the date of sale.
Pristop, ki ga je zahteval proizvajalec izvoznik, ne bi bil v skladu z osnovno uredbo, v kateri se zahteva uporaba menjalnega tečaja, ki velja na dan prodaje.
One exporting producer contested the use of monthly exchange rates of the European Central Bank and insisted on using its daily exchange rates.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je nasprotoval uporabi mesečnih menjalnih tečajev Evropske centralne banke in je vztrajal pri uporabi dnevnih menjalnih tečajev.
The exporting producer did not quantify what difference that application would cause.
Proizvajalec izvoznik ni količinsko opredelil razlike, ki bi nastala zaradi navedene uporabe.
The Commission used the monthly rates for comparability and consistency purposes, as the dumping margin for this producer was a part of one dumping margin calculated for one group of related producers where only one claimed the use of daily exchange rates.
Komisija je mesečne tečaje uporabila zaradi primerljivosti in doslednosti, saj je bila stopnja dampinga za tega proizvajalca del ene stopnje dampinga, izračunane za eno skupino povezanih proizvajalcev, v okviru katere je le eden od njih zahteval uporabo dnevnih menjalnih tečajev.
Taking into account the changes in the normal value set out in recital 56 above, the definitive dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Ob upoštevanju sprememb normalne vrednosti, določenih v uvodni izjavi 56 zgoraj, so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
Eng Iron Works Co., Ltd and Yieh United Steel Corporation
Eng Iron Works Co., Ltd. and Yieh United Steel Corporation
As set out in recital 90 of the provisional Regulation, the like product was manufactured by nine known producers in the Union during the investigation period.
Kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi 90 začasne uredbe, je podobni izdelek v obdobju preiskave proizvajalo devet znanih proizvajalcev Unije.
In the absence of additional comments, the definition of the Union industry as set out in recitals 90 to 93 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Ker ni bilo dodatnih pripomb, se potrdi opredelitev industrije Unije iz uvodnih izjav od 90 do 93 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of comments concerning the union consumption, the provisional findings in recitals 94 to 96 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi s potrošnjo Unije, se potrdijo začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od 94 do 96 začasne uredbe.
Following disclosure, interested parties reiterated their claims brought forward at the provisional stage that the Commission incorrectly cumulatively assessed the effects on the dumped imports from the PRC and Taiwan.
Po razkritju so zainteresirane strani ponovile svoje trditve, ki so jih navedle v začasni fazi, da je Komisija nepravilno skupno ocenila učinke na dampinški izvoz iz LRK in Tajvana.
They did not provide new elements substantiating this claim.
Te trditve niso podkrepile z novimi elementi.
As set out in recital 66 above, following comments on provisional disclosure one Taiwanese exporting producer was found not to be dumping.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 66 zgoraj, se je po pripombah o začasnem razkritju ugotovilo, da en tajvanski proizvajalec izvoznik ni izvajal dampinga.
Consequently, the exports of this company to the Union were deducted from the dumped imports from the PRC and Taiwan.
Zato se je izvoz te družbe v Unijo odštel od dampinškega uvoza iz LRK in Tajvana.
In the absence of other comments concerning the cumulative assessment, the provisional findings in recitals 97 to 102 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi s kumulativno oceno, se potrdijo začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od 97 do 102 začasne uredbe.
As set out in recital 71 above, the imports from one Taiwanese exporting producer found not to be dumping were deducted from the dumped imports.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 71 zgoraj, se je izvoz enega tajvanskega proizvajalca izvoznika, za katerega se je ugotovilo, da ni izvajal dampinga, odštel od dampinškega uvoza.
For confidentiality reasons the volume and market share of these imports cannot be disclosed.
Obsega in tržnega deleža tega uvoza ni mogoče razkriti zaradi zaupnosti.
However, the deduction of the negligible volume and market share of these imports, which is significantly less than 1 %, did not affect the trend of the development of the volume and the market share of the dumped imports form the countries concerned during the period considered.
Vendar odštetje zanemarljivega obsega in tržnega deleža tega uvoza, ki je znatno pod 1 %, ni vplivalo na trend gibanja obsega in tržnega deleža dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav v obravnavanem obdobju.
In the absence of other comments concerning the volume and market share of the imports from the countries concerned and taking into account the revised findings set out in recital 73 above, the provisional findings in recitals 103 to 106 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z obsegom in tržnim deležem uvoza iz zadevnih držav ter ob upoštevanju revidiranih ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave 73 zgoraj, se potrdijo začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od 103 do 106 začasne uredbe.
Following provisional disclosure, interested parties requested additional information concerning the nature of the ‘post importation costs’ referred to in recital 110(ii) of the provisional Regulation.
Zainteresirane strani so po začasnem razkritju zahtevale dodatne informacije o naravi stroškov, nastalih po uvozu, iz uvodne izjave 110(ii) začasne uredbe.
These costs referred to the cost for handling and temporary storage of the imported products at the point of importation, customs clearance fee and bank costs.
Ti stroški so se nanašali na manipulativne stroške in stroške za začasno shranjevanje uvoženih izdelkov na točki uvoza, pristojbino za carinjenje ter bančne stroške.
The post importation costs were subject to verification during the visits at the importers' premises listed in recital 7 above.
Stroški, nastali po uvozu, so se preverili med obiski v prostorih uvoznikov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 7 zgoraj.
Following these verification visits the Commission established that the importation costs are lower than those established on the basis of the data available at the time of the provisional Regulation.
Komisija je po teh preveritvenih obiskih ugotovila, da so stroški uvoza nižji od stroškov, določenih na podlagi podatkov, ki so bili na voljo v času začasne uredbe.
Following final disclosure, an interested party claimed to be unable to verify whether all costs related to importation until the delivery to the first customer in the Union were duly taken into account.
Po dokončnem razkritju je zainteresirana stran trdila, da ni mogla preveriti, ali so se ustrezno upoštevali vsi stroški, povezani z uvozom do dobave prvi stranki v Uniji.
In this respect, it is clarified that the price undercutting is a comparison between the ex-works Union industry's sales price and the customs-cleared price of the exporting producers at the Union frontier.
V zvezi s tem je bilo pojasnjeno, da je nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen primerjava med prodajno ceno franko tovarna industrije Unije in ceno po carinjenju proizvajalcev izvoznikov na meji Unije.
Therefore, the costs between the port and the first independent customer are not taken into account in this comparison.
Zato se pri tej primerjavi ne upoštevajo stroški med pristaniščem in prvo neodvisno stranko.
An interested party noted that a significant proportion of the like product in the Union is sold with a protective film [5].
Zainteresirana stran je navedla, da se znaten delež podobnega izdelka v Uniji prodaja z zaščitno folijo [5].
The exporting producer argued that the use of the film should be reflected in the PCN used by the Commission, as it significantly affects the price.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi morala biti uporaba folije razvidna iz kontrolnih številk izdelka, ki jih uporablja Komisija, saj precej vpliva na ceno.
This claim was brought forward very late, about 11 months after the initiation of the investigation and some 10 months after the PCN was made known to the parties.
Ta trditev je bila predložena zelo pozno, približno 11 mesecev po začetku preiskave in približno 10 mesecev po tem, ko so bile strankam razkrite kontrolne številke izdelka.
At this stage, the Commission was not in a position to identify the affected transactions individually.
Na tej stopnji Komisija ni mogla posamično opredeliti zadevnih transakcij.
The Commission made however an overall adjustment, based on the information provided by the Union industry in reaction to this claim.
Komisija je vseeno izvedla skupno prilagoditev na podlagi informacij, ki jih je prejela od industrije Unije v odziv na to trditev.
Following final disclosure, the same interested party argued that the adjustment should not be made overall, but only to the transactions where the like product was actually covered by protective film.
Po končnem razkritju je ista zainteresirana stran trdila, da se prilagoditev ne bi smela izvesti skupno, temveč le za transakcije, pri katerih je podoben izdelek dejansko prekrivala zaščitna folija.
The party further disagrees with the assessment that their claim was made late, since this information was publically available before the initiation of this investigation.
Stran se prav tako ne strinja z oceno, da je bila njihova trditev poslana pozno, saj je bila ta informacija javno dostopna pred začetkom te preiskave.
As already explained, the Commission applied an overall adjustment as it was not possible to identify the affected transactions individually.
Kot je bilo že pojasnjeno, je Komisija uporabila skupno prilagoditev, ker zadevnih transakcij ni mogla posamično opredeliti.
It is known that the affected transactions are in a not insignificant proportion of all transactions.
Znano je, da delež zadevnih transakcij med vsemi transakcijami ni zanemarljiv.
A party cannot merely rely on information being publically available, but has to put forward a substantiated claim to justify an adjustment.
Stran se ne more zanašati zgolj na javno dostopne informacije, temveč mora prilagoditev upravičiti z utemeljenim zahtevkom.
The effect of recalculating these lower importation costs was largely offset by the adjustment referring to the protective film.
Učinek ponovnega izračunavanja teh nižjih stroškov uvoza se je v veliki meri izravnal s prilagoditvijo, ki se je nanašala na zaščitno folijo.
The combined effect of those two adjustments showed an almost unchanged weighted average undercutting margin for the imports from the countries concerned on the Union market of between 9,8 % and 11,4 % (compared to between 9,6 % and 11,3 % in the provisional Regulation).
Združeni učinek obeh navedenih prilagoditev je pokazal skoraj nespremenjeno tehtano povprečno stopnjo nelojalno znižanih prodajnih cen za uvoz iz zadevnih držav na trgu Unije, ki je znašala med 9,8 % in 11,4 % (v primerjavi z med 9,6 % in 11,3 % v začasni uredbi).
The weighted average underselling margin for the imports from the countries concerned on the Union market also remained almost unchanged at between 23,1 % and 25,3 % (compared to between 22,9 % and 25,2 % in the provisional Regulation).
Skoraj nespremenjena je ostala tudi tehtana povprečna stopnja nelojalnega nižanja ciljnih cen za uvoz iz zadevnih držav na trgu Unije, ki je znašala med 23,1 % in 25,3 % (v primerjavi z med 22,9 % in 25,2 % v začasni uredbi).