natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
amending Implementing Decision 2014/88/EU suspending temporarily imports from Bangladesh of foodstuffs containing or consisting of betel leaves (‘Piper Betle’) as regards its period of application
o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/88/EU o začasni prekinitvi uvoza živil, ki vsebujejo ali so sestavljena iz betelovih listov (Piper betle), iz Bangladeša glede obdobja uporabe
(notified under document C(2016) 3181)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2016) 3181)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety [1], and in particular Article 53(1)(b)(i) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane [1], in zlasti člena 53(1)(b)(i) Uredbe,
It was adopted following a high number of notifications issued to the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) due to the presence of a wide range of salmonella strains, including salmonella typhimurium, found in foodstuffs containing or consisting of betel leaves from Bangladesh.
Združeno kraljestvo je od leta 2011 poročalo o več izbruhih zastrupitve s salmonelo iz betelovih listov.
Salmonella typhimurium strain is the second most reported serotype in human cases and high prevalences have been found in foodstuffs containing or consisting of betel leaves (‘Piper betle’, commonly known as ‘Paan leaf’ or ‘Betel quid’) from Bangladesh.
Ker Bangladeš ni mogel zagotoviti jamstev za zavarovanje uvoza betelovih listov v Unijo in kljub prizadevanjem Komisije, je bilo z izvedbenima sklepoma Komisije 2014/510/EU [3] in (EU) 2015/1028 [4] podaljšano obdobje uporabe začasne ustavitve uvoza teh proizvodov, kot je določeno v Izvedbenem sklepu 2014/88/EU, in sicer do 30. junija 2015 oziroma do 30. junija 2016.
Since 2011, the United Kingdom has reported several outbreaks of salmonella poisoning from betel leaves.
Revidirani akcijski načrt, ki ga je Bangladeš predložil avgusta 2015, je bil nepopoln.
Since Bangladesh was not able to provide guarantees securing the imports of betel leaves into the Union and despite efforts from the Commission, Commission Implementing Decisions 2014/510/EU [3] and (EU) 2015/1028 [4] extended the period of application of the temporary suspension of imports of these products laid down in Implementing Decision 2014/88/EU until 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2016 respectively.
Ni bilo jamstev za njegovo učinkovito uporabo in izvrševanje.
The revised action plan submitted by Bangladesh in August 2015 was incomplete.
Nove informacije, ki jih je Bangladeš predložil aprila 2016, niso nadalje dokazale učinkovitosti navedenega akcijskega načrta.
There were no guarantees on its effective application and enforcement.
Prepoved izvoza betelovih listov, ki ga je maja 2013 uvedel Bangladeš, še vedno velja.
The new information submitted by Bangladesh in April 2016 did not further demonstrate the effectiveness of that action plan.
Vendar se ni izkazal za v celoti učinkovitega in po njegovem sprejetju je bilo prek sistema RASFF sporočenih 26 primerov poskusa uvoza betelovih listov v Unijo.
The self-imposed export ban on betel leaves introduced by Bangladesh in May 2013 remains in place.
Zato jamstva, ki jih je zagotovil Bangladeš, ne zadoščajo za odpravo resnih tveganj za zdravje ljudi.
However, it has not proved to be fully effective and since its adoption, 26 cases of attempted imports of betel leaves into the Union have been reported in the RASFF.
Nujne ukrepe iz Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/88/EU bi bilo zato treba še naprej ohraniti.
Therefore, the guarantees provided by Bangladesh are insufficient to address the serious risks to human health.
Obdobje uporabe Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/88/EU bi bilo zato treba dodatno podaljšati.
The period of application of Implementing Decision 2014/88/EU should therefore be further extended.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Article 4 of Implementing Decision 2014/88/EU is replaced by the following:
Ta sklep se uporablja do 30. junija 2018.“
This Decision shall apply until 30 June 2018.’.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na države članice.
Article 2
V Bruslju, 1. junija 2016
Done at Brussels, 1 June 2016.
Član Komisije
Member of the Commission
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2014/88/EU z dne 13. februarja 2014 o začasni prekinitvi uvoza živil, ki vsebujejo ali so sestavljena iz betelovih listov (Piper betle), iz Bangladeša (UL L 45, 15.2.2014, str. 34).
OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1.
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2014/510/EU z dne 29. julija 2014 o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/88/EU o začasni prekinitvi uvoza živil, ki vsebujejo ali so sestavljena iz betelovih listov (Piper betle), iz Bangladeša, glede obdobja uporabe (UL L 228, 31.7.2014, str. 33).
Commission Implementing Decision 2014/88/EU of 13 February 2014 suspending temporarily imports from Bangladesh of foodstuffs containing or consisting of betel leaves (‘Piper betle’) ( OJ L 45, 15.2.2014, p. 34).
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/1028 z dne 26. junija 2015 o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/88/EU o začasni prekinitvi uvoza živil, ki vsebujejo ali so sestavljena iz betelovih listov (Piper betle), iz Bangladeša, glede obdobja uporabe (UL L 163, 30.6.2015, str. 53).
Commission Implementing Decision 2014/510/EU of 29 July 2014 amending Implementing Decision 2014/88/EU suspending temporarily imports from Bangladesh of foodstuffs containing or consisting of betel leaves (‘Piper betle’) as regards its period of application ( OJ L 228, 31.7.2014, p. 33).
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2014/88/EU [2] je prepovedal uvoz v Unijo živil, ki vsebujejo ali so sestavljena iz betelovih listov, iz Bangladeša do 31. julija 2014.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1028 of 26 June 2015 amending Implementing Decision 2014/88/EU suspending temporarily imports from Bangladesh of foodstuffs containing or consisting of betel leaves (‘Piper betle’) as regards its period of application ( OJ L 163, 30.6.2015, p. 53).
Sprejet je bil zaradi velikega števila obvestil, poslanih prek sistema hitrega obveščanja za živila in krmo (RASFF) zaradi ugotovljene prisotnosti različnih sevov salmonele, vključno s Salmonella typhimurium, v živilih, ki vsebujejo ali so sestavljena iz betelovih listov.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/887
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/887
of 2 June 2016
z dne 2. junija 2016
amending Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC as regards the list of third countries or parts thereof from which the introduction into the Union of meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines is authorised
o spremembi Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES glede seznama tretjih držav ali njihovih delov, iz katerih je dovoljen vnos mesnih izdelkov ter obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev v Unijo
(notified under document C(2016) 3215)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2016) 3215)
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption [1], and in particular the introductory phrase of Article 8, the first subparagraph of point 1 of Article 8, point (4) of Article 8 and Article 9(4)(c) thereof,
Ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/99/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o predpisih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih prehrani ljudi [1], in zlasti uvodnega stavka člena 8, prvega pododstavka člena 8(1), člena 8(4) in člena 9(4)(c) Direktive,
Commission Decision 2007/777/EC [2] lays down, inter alia, the conditions for the introduction into the Union of consignments of certain meat products and of treated stomachs, bladders and intestines which have undergone one of the treatments laid down in Part 4 of Annex II thereto (‘the commodities’), including a list of third countries or parts thereof from which the introduction into the Union of the commodities is authorised.
Odločba Komisije 2007/777/ES [2] med drugim določa pogoje za vnos v Unijo pošiljk določenih mesnih izdelkov ter obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev, ki so bili obdelani z eno od obdelav iz dela 4 Priloge II k navedeni odločbi („blago“), vključno s seznamom tretjih držav ali njihovih delov, iz katerih je dovoljen vnos blaga v Unijo.
Where third countries are regionalised for the purpose of being listed in Decision 2007/777/EC the regionalised parts of their territory are listed in Part 1 of Annex II thereto.
Kadar so tretje države regionalizirane za namen vključitve v Odločbo 2007/777/ES, so regionalizirani deli njihovih ozemelj navedeni v delu 1 Priloge II k navedeni odločbi.
Part 2 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC sets out the list of third countries or parts thereof which are authorised for the introduction into the Union of the commodities, provided that they have undergone a relevant treatment referred to in that Part of Annex II.
Del 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES določa seznam tretjih držav ali njihovih delov, iz katerih je dovoljen vnos blaga v Unijo, če je bilo to blago obdelano z ustrezno obdelavo iz navedenega dela Priloge II.
Those treatments are aimed at eliminating certain animal health risks linked to the specific commodities.
Cilj navedenih obdelav je odpraviti določeno tveganje za zdravje živali, ki je povezano z določenim blagom.
Part 4 of that Annex sets out a non-specific treatment ‘A’ and specific treatments ‘B’ to ‘F’ listed in descending order of severity of the animal health risk linked to the specific commodity.
Del 4 navedene priloge določa splošno obdelavo „A“ in posebne obdelave od „B“ do „F“, naštete v padajočem vrstnem redu po resnosti tveganja za zdravje živali, povezanega z določenim blagom.
Argentina and Brazil have requested to be listed in Part 2 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC as authorised for the introduction of commodities of domestic bovine animals from all parts of their territory that are already authorised for introduction into the Union of fresh meat of the same species of animals as described in Part 1 of Annex II to Commission Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 [3].
Argentina in Brazilija sta zaprosili za vključitev v del 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES kot državi z dovoljenjem za vnos blaga iz domačega goveda iz vseh delov njunih ozemelj, iz katerih je že dovoljen vnos svežega mesa iste vrste živali v Unijo, v skladu z delom 1 Priloge II k Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 206/2010 [3].
As the commodities to be introduced into the Union must undergo a treatment set out in Part 4 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC, the description of the regionalised territories of Argentina and Brazil for the commodities referred to as AR-1, AR-2 and BR-2 in Part 1 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC, should be amended in order to be aligned with the regionalisation applied to Argentina and Brazil for the introduction into the Union of fresh meat of domestic bovine animals as described in Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010.
Ker mora biti blago za vnos v Unijo obdelano z obdelavo iz dela 4 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES, bi bilo treba spremeniti opis regionaliziranih ozemelj Argentine in Brazilije z oznakami AR-1, AR-2 in BR-2 v delu 1 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES za uskladitev z regionalizacijo za Argentino in Brazilijo za vnos svežega mesa domačega goveda v skladu delom 1 Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010.
In addition, Brazil has requested a new area of Brazil to be authorised for the introduction into the Union of commodities which have been obtained from domestic bovine animals and subjected to the specific treatment ‘B’ set out in Part 4 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC.
Poleg tega je Brazilija zaprosila za dovoljenje za vnos blaga, pridobljenega iz domačega goveda in obdelanega s posebno obdelavo„B“ iz dela 4 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES, iz novega območja Brazilije v Unijo.
Considering that that area is part of the territory of Brazil which is recognised as free of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) [4] without vaccination by the World Organisation for Animal Health (the OIE) and the application of the specific treatment ‘B’ to the commodities concerned, that area should be authorised for the introduction of the commodities into the Union.
Glede na to, da je to območje del ozemlja Brazilije, ki ga je Svetovna organizacija za zdravje živali priznala kot prostega slinavke in parkljevke [4] brez cepljenja, in glede na uporabo posebne obdelave „B“ za zadevno blago bi bilo treba dovoliti vnos blaga v Unijo iz navedenega območja.
Therefore that part of the territory of Brazil should be listed in Part 1 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC as BR-4.
Zato bi bilo treba navedeni del ozemlja Brazilije vključiti v del 1 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES kot BR-4.
Consignments of commodities obtained from domestic bovine animals from the part of Brazil described as BR-4, should be authorised for introduction into the Union, subject to the specific treatment ‘B’ as set out in Part 4 of that Annex and therefore BR-4 should be listed in Part 2 of that Annex.
Za pošiljke blaga, pridobljenega iz domačega goveda iz dela Brazilije z oznako BR-4, ki je bilo obdelano s posebno obdelavo „B“ iz dela 4 navedene priloge, bi bilo treba dovoliti vnos v Unijo, zato bi bilo treba BR-4 vključiti v del 2 navedene priloge.
Parts 1 and 2 of Annex II to Decision 2007/777/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Dela 1 in 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2007/777/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Done at Brussels, 2 June 2016.
V Bruslju, 2. junija 2016
In Part 1, the entries for Argentina and Brazil are replaced by the following:
V delu 1 se vnosa za Argentino in Brazilijo nadomestita z naslednjim:
Whole country.
Celotno ozemlje države.
The territories defined in AR-1 and AR-3 in Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010.
Ozemlja, opredeljena z oznakama AR-1 in AR-3 v delu 1 Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010.
The territories defined in AR-2 in Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010.
Ozemlja, opredeljena z oznako AR-2 v delu 1 Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010.
States of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Paraná, São Paulo and Mato Grosso do Sul.
Zvezne države Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Paraná, São Paulo in Mato Grosso do Sul.
The territories defined in BR-1, BR-2, BR-3 and BR-4 in Part 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010.
Ozemlja, opredeljena z oznakami BR-1, BR-2, BR-3 in BR-4 v delu 1 Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010.
States of Goiás, Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina and São Paulo.
Zvezne države Goiás, Minas Gerais, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina in São Paulo.
Distrito Federal, States of Acre, Rondônia, Pará, Tocantins, Maranhão, Piauí, Bahia, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas and Sergipe.’
Zvezni okraj (Distrito Federal), zvezne države Acre, Rondônia, Pará, Tocantins, Maranhão, Piauí, Bahia, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas in Sergipe.“
In Part 2, the following row is added to the entry for Brazil:
V delu 2 se doda naslednja vrstica k vnosu za Brazilijo:
‘Brazil BR-4
„Brazilija BR-4
Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/890
Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2016/890
of 6 June 2016
z dne 6. junija 2016
amending Decision 2014/219/CFSP on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)
o spremembi Sklepa 2014/219/SZVP o misiji Evropske unije v okviru SVOP v Maliju (EUCAP Sahel Mali)
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 28, člena 42(4) ter člena 43(2) Pogodbe,
On 15 April 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/219/CFSP [1] on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali).
Svet je 15. aprila 2014 sprejel Sklep 2014/219/SZVP [1] o misiji Evropske unije v okviru SVOP v Maliju (EUCAP Sahel Mali).
On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/50 [2] providing EUCAP Sahel Mali with a reference amount until 14 January 2017.
Svet je 18. januarja 2016 sprejel Sklep (SZVP) 2016/50 [2], s katerim je bil EUCAP Sahel Mali zagotovljen referenčni znesek do 14. januarja 2017.
EUCAP Sahel Mali should take enhanced security measures and the number of staff should be adapted.
V okviru EUCAP Sahel Mali bi bilo treba sprejeti boljše varnostne ukrepe in prilagoditi število osebja misije.
Decision 2014/219/CFSP should be amended to adapt the reference amount for EUCAP Sahel Mali,
Sklep 2014/219/SZVP bi bilo treba spremeniti, da se prilagodi referenčni znesek za EUCAP Sahel Mali –
In Article 14 of Decision 2014/219/CFSP, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
V členu 14 Sklepa 2014/219/SZVP se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 April 2014 to 14 January 2015 shall be EUR 5500000.
„Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z EUCAP Sahel Mali, od 15. aprila 2014 do 14. januarja 2015 znaša 5500000 EUR.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 January 2015 to 14 January 2016 shall be EUR 11400000.
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z EUCAP Sahel Mali, od 15. januarja 2015 do 14. januarja 2016 znaša 11400000 EUR.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 January 2016 to 14 January 2017 shall be EUR 19775000.
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z EUCAP Sahel Mali, od 15. januarja 2016 do 14. januarja 2017 znaša 19775000 EUR.
Done at Luxembourg, 6 June 2016.
V Luxembourgu, 6. junija 2016
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/894
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/894
setting out a recommendation for temporary internal border control in exceptional circumstances putting the overall functioning of the Schengen area at risk
o priporočilu za začasni nadzor na notranjih mejah v izrednih okoliščinah, ki ogrožajo splošno delovanje schengenskega območja
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) [1] and in particular Article 29 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/399 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 2016 o Zakoniku Unije o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah) [1], in zlasti člena 29 Uredbe,
The EU is facing an unprecedented migratory and refugee crisis following a sharp increase of mixed migratory flows since 2015.
EU se sooča z največjo migracijsko in begunsko krizo doslej, kar je posledica velikega povečanja mešanih migracijskih tokov od leta 2015.
This has led to severe difficulties in ensuring efficient external border control in accordance with the Schengen acquis and in the reception and processing of migrants arriving.
To je povzročilo resne težave pri zagotavljanju učinkovitega nadzora zunanjih meja v skladu s schengenskim pravnim redom ter pri sprejemanju in obravnavi prispelih migrantov.
Wider structural deficiencies in the way the Union's external borders are protected have also become evident in this crisis.
V tej krizi so postale očitne tudi širše strukturne pomanjkljivosti pri varovanju zunanjih meja Unije.
The Hellenic Republic is, mainly due to its geographical situation, particularly affected by these developments and has faced a dramatic increase in the number of migrants arriving on the Aegean islands.
Ta razvoj dogodkov je predvsem zaradi njenega geografskega položaja še posebej prizadel Helensko republiko, saj se je število migrantov, ki prihajajo na Egejske otoke, dramatično povečalo.
In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 [2] and the annual evaluation programme for 2015 [3], an unannounced on-site visit was carried out from 10 to 13 November 2015 to evaluate the implementation of the Schengen acquis in the field of the management of the external border by the Hellenic Republic at its land border (Orestiada, Fylakio, Kastanies, Nea Vyssa) and sea border (Chios and Samos Islands) with Turkey.
V skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 1053/2013 [2] in letnim ocenjevalnim programom za leto 2015 [3] je bil od 10. do 13. novembra 2015 opravljen nenapovedan obisk na kraju samem, da bi se ocenilo izvajanje schengenskega pravnega reda na področju upravljanja zunanjih meja s strani Helenske republike na kopenski meji (Orestiada, Filakio, Kastanies, Nea Visa) in morski meji (otoka Hios in Samos) s Turčijo.
On 2 February 2016 the Commission adopted an implementing decision establishing a report of the evaluation of the Hellenic Republic on the implementation of the Schengen acquis in the field of the management of the external border [4] concluding that there are serious deficiencies in the carrying out of external border control that must be overcome and dealt with by the Hellenic authorities.
Komisija je 2. februarja 2016 sprejela izvedbeni sklep o poročilu o oceni izvajanja schengenskega pravnega reda na področju upravljanja zunanjih meja s strani Helenske republike [4], v katerem je ugotovila, da obstajajo resne pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju nadzora na zunanjih mejah, ki jih morajo grški organi obravnavati in odpraviti.
On 12 February 2016 the Council adopted recommendations on addressing the serious deficiencies identified during the evaluation and indicated the priorities for implementing them.
Svet je 12. februarja 2016 sprejel priporočila o obravnavi resnih pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih med ocenjevanjem, in navedel prednostne naloge za njihovo izvajanje.
Appropriate measures should be taken by the Hellenic authorities to ensure that at all its external borders, external border control is carried out and brought in line with the Schengen acquis in order not to jeopardise the functioning of the Schengen area.
Grški organi bi morali sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se na vseh zunanjih mejah Helenske republike nadzor zunanje meje izvaja v skladu s schengenskim pravnim redom, da se ne ogrozi delovanje schengenskega območja.
On 24 February 2016 the Commission adopted recommendations on specific measures to be taken by the Hellenic Republic following the evaluation report of 2 February 2016 to ensure compliance with the recommendations of the Council of 12 February 2016.
Komisija je 24. februarja 2016 sprejela priporočila za posebne ukrepe, ki jih mora sprejeti Helenska republika v zvezi z ocenjevalnim poročilom z dne 2. februarja 2016, da se zagotovi skladnost s priporočili Sveta z dne 12. februarja 2016.
On 12 March 2016 the Hellenic Republic notified its Action Plan to remedy the deficiencies identified in the evaluation report and subject to the Council recommendations.
Helenska republika je 12. marca 2016 predložila svoj akcijski načrt za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih v ocenjevalnem poročilu, ob upoštevanju priporočil Sveta.
The Commission presented on 12 April 2016 its assessment of the adequacy of the Action Plan to the Council.
Komisija je 12. aprila 2016 Svetu predstavila svojo oceno ustreznosti akcijskega načrta.
While the Commission concluded that significant progress has been made by Greece, further improvements to the Action Plan are needed in order to adequately and comprehensively address the deficiencies identified in the Evaluation Report.
Komisija je sklenila, da je Grčija sicer dosegla znaten napredek, vendar je treba za ustrezno in celovito obravnavo pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih v ocenjevalnem poročilu, še izboljšati akcijski načrt.
It requested Greece to provide additional elements and clarifications on its Action Plan by 26 April.
Zahtevala je, da ji Grčija do 26. aprila predloži dodatne elemente in pojasnila o svojem akcijskem načrtu.
On 26 April 2016 the Hellenic Republic provided the Commission with the requested additional elements and clarifications on its Action Plan.
Helenska republika je zahtevane dodatne elemente in pojasnila o svojem akcijskem načrtu Komisiji predložila 26. aprila 2016.