natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where Parliament sets up a Committee of Inquiry pursuant to Article 226 TFEU and to Decision 95/167/EC, Euratom, ECSC of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission [7], the Board, in accordance with Union law, shall assist such Committee of Inquiry in carrying out its tasks in accordance with the principle of sincere cooperation.The Board shall cooperate sincerely with any investigation by Parliament referred to in Article 45(8) of the SRM Regulation within the same framework that applies to committees of inquiry and under the same confidentiality protection as foreseen in this Agreement for the special confidential meetings.
Kadar Evropski parlament v skladu s členom 226 PDEU in Sklepom 95/167/ES, Euratom, ESPJ Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije [7] oblikuje preiskovalni odbor, odbor v skladu s pravom Unije pomaga preiskovalnemu odboru pri izvajanju nalog v skladu z načelom lojalnega sodelovanja.Odbor lojalno sodeluje pri vseh preiskavah Evropskega parlamenta iz člena 45(8) uredbe o enotnem mehanizmu za reševanje, in sicer v okviru, ki velja za preiskovalne odbore, ter ob upoštevanju varstva zasebnosti, kakor ga ta sporazum predvideva za posebne zaupne seje.
All recipients of information provided to Parliament in the context of investigations shall be subject to confidentiality requirements equivalent to those applying to the members of the Board.
Za vse prejemnike informacij, ki se Evropskemu parlamenta posredujejo v okviru preiskav, veljajo enake zahteve glede zaupnosti kot za člane odbora.
Parliament and the Board shall agree on the measures to be applied to ensure the protection of such information.
Evropski parlament in odbor se dogovorita, kateri ukrepi se uporabljajo za varstvo takih informacij.
Parliament shall have regard to the public or private interests governing the right of access to Parliament, Council and Commission documents recognised in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, which are involved in information and documents submitted by the Board in the context of a Committee of Inquiry.
Evropski parlament upošteva javne ali zasebne interese, na katere se nanaša pravica do dostopa do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, kakor priznava Uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001, in ki zadevajo informacije in dokumente, ki jih odbor posreduje v sklopu preiskovalnega odbora.
Before the adoption of the Code of Conduct by the plenary session of the Board, the Board shall inform Parliament's competent committee of the main elements of the envisaged Code of Conduct.
Odbor pred sprejetjem predvidenega kodeksa ravnanja seznani pristojni odbor Evropskega parlamenta z njegovimi glavnimi elementi.
Upon written request of Parliament's competent committee, the Board shall inform Parliament in writing of the implementation of the Code of Conduct.
Odbor na pisno zahtevo pristojnega odbora Evropskega parlamenta pisno seznani Evropski parlament z izvajanjem kodeksa ravnanja.
The Board shall also inform Parliament about the need for any updates to the Code of Conduct.
Odbor ga tudi obvesti, kadar je treba kodeks ravnanja posodobiti.
The Code of Conduct shall address the following:
V kodeksu ravnanja je obravnavano naslednje:
i. in accordance with Article 47 of the SRM Regulation, the independence of the Chair, the Vice-Chair and the four full-time Board members from any Union institution or body, from any government of a Member State and from any other public or private body, as well as their objectivity;
da so predsednik, podpredsednik in štirje polnopravni člani odbora v skladu s členom 47 uredbe o enotnem mehanizmu za reševanje objektivni in neodvisni od vseh institucij ali organov Unije, vseh vlad držav članic in vseh drugih javnih ali zasebnih organov;
the performance of tasks by the Board in accordance with principles of public accountability for its actions and full transparency without prejudice to the safeguards of the adequate confidentiality of the Board's information and documents; and
da odbor izvaja svoje naloge v skladu z načeloma javne odgovornosti za svoje delovanje in popolne preglednosti, brez poseganja v zaščitne ukrepe za ustrezno zaupnost informacij in dokumentov odbora ter
the operational independence and the avoidance of conflicts of interest between the functions of the national resolution authorities in accordance with Article 3(3) of Directive 2014/59/EU.
operativna neodvisnost in preprečevanje nasprotja interesov s funkcijami nacionalnih organov za reševanje v skladu s členom 3(3) Direktive 2014/59/EU.
The Board shall publish the Code of Conduct on its website.
Odbor objavi kodeks ravnanja na svojem spletnem mestu.
V. ADOPTION OF ACTS BY THE BOARD
V. SPREJEMANJE AKTOV V ODBORU
The Board shall duly inform Parliament's competent committee of the procedures, including timing, it has set up for adoption of Board decisions, guidelines, general and other instructions, recommendations and warnings (Board acts).
Odbor obvesti pristojni odbor Evropskega parlamenta o postopkih (vključno s časovnim razporedom), predvidenih za sprejetje sklepov, smernic, splošnih in drugih navodil, priporočil in opozoril (v nadaljnjem besedilu: akti odbora).
The Board shall, in particular, inform Parliament's competent committee of the principles and types of indicators or information it generally uses in developing Board acts and policy recommendations, with a view to enhancing transparency and policy consistency.
Odbor obvesti pristojni odbor Evropskega parlamenta zlasti o načelih in vrstah kazalnikov ali informacij, ki jih običajno uporablja pri pripravi svojih aktov in političnih priporočil, da se povečata preglednost in skladnost politik.
In the event that it conducts a public consultation on draft Board acts, the Board shall submit to Parliament's competent committee those draft Board acts before the beginning of the public consultation procedure.
Če odbor izvede javno posvetovanje o osnutkih svojih aktov, jih pred postopkom javnega posvetovanja posreduje pristojnemu odboru Evropskega parlamenta.
Where Parliament submits comments on draft Board acts, there may be informal exchanges of views with the Board on such comments.
Če Evropski parlament poda pripombe k aktom, se lahko z odborom o njih opravi neuradna izmenjava mnenj.
Once the Board has adopted a Board act, it shall send it to Parliament's competent committee.
Ko odbor sprejme akt, ga pošlje pristojnemu odboru Evropskega parlamenta.
The Board shall also regularly inform Parliament in writing about any need to update adopted Board acts.
Odbor tudi redno pisno obvešča Evropski parlament, kadar je treba posodobiti sprejete akte odbora.
TRANSITORY PROVISION
PREHODNA DOLOČBA
During the start-up phase of the Board until 1 January 2016, or until the date of application of Article 99(2) of the SRM Regulation, whichever is the later, the Board shall, regularly or at the request of Parliament's competent committee, inform Parliament of the progress of the operational implementation of the SRM Regulation.
Odbor v svoji začetni fazi do 1. januarja 2016 ali do datuma začetka uporabe člena 99(2) uredbe o enotnem mehanizmu za reševanje – kar je pozneje –, redno ali na zahtevo pristojnega odbora Evropskega parlamenta obvešča Evropski parlament o napredku pri operativnem izvajanju uredbe o enotnem mehanizmu za reševanje.
The information referred to in the first paragraph may be provided orally or in writing and shall include inter alia:
Informacije iz prvega odstavka se lahko posredujejo ustno ali pisno in med drugim zajemajo:
i. internal preparation, organisation and work planning;
notranje priprave, organizacijo in načrtovanje dela;
cooperation with other national or Union competent authorities;
sodelovanje z drugimi pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi ali organi Unije;
any obstacles encountered by the Board in the preparation of its resolution tasks;
morebitne ovire, na katere odbor naleti med pripravami na nadzorne naloge;
any events of concern or changes to the Code of Conduct;
morebitne druge pomembne dogodke ali spremembe kodeksa ravnanja;
v. any steps taken by the Board in cooperation with participating Member States to develop the appropriate methods and modalities permitting the enhancement of the capacity of the Fund to contract alternative funding means, that should be in place by the date of application of the SRM Regulation, in accordance with Recital 107 and Article 74 of that Regulation, and the negotiations and the conclusion by the Board of financial arrangements, including where possible of public financial arrangements, in accordance with Article 74 of that Regulation.
vse ukrepe, ki jih odbor skupaj s sodelujočimi državami članicami sprejme za razvoj ustreznih metod in načinov, s katerimi bi se izboljšala zmožnost sklada za pridobivanje alternativnih finančnih sredstev, ki naj bi bila v skladu z uvodno izjavo 107 in členom 74 navedene uredbe na voljo do datuma začetka uporabe uredbe o enotnem mehanizmu za reševanje, ter pogajanja odbora in sklepanje shem financiranja, po možnosti tudi javnih finančnih shem v skladu s členom 74 navedene uredbe.
The information referred to in points i to v above shall be in addition to the monthly reports on whether the conditions for the transfer of contributions to the Fund have been met, which the Board shall submit in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 99(6) of the SRM Regulation and, where applicable, to the monthly reports issued in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 99(6) of the SRM Regulation where the conditions for the transfer of the contributions have not been met.
Informacije iz točk (i) do (v) se posredujejo poleg mesečnih poročil o tem, ali so izpolnjeni pogoji za prenos prispevkov v sklad, ki jih odbor posreduje v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 99(6) uredbe o enotnem mehanizmu za reševanje, in po možnosti poleg mesečnih poročil v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 99(6) navedene uredbe, če pogoji za prenos prispevkov niso izpolnjeni.
The practical implementation of this Agreement shall be assessed by the two parties every three years.
Obe strani vsaka tri leta ocenita izvajanje tega sporazuma v praksi.
Where necessary, the two parties shall adapt the Agreement in light of experience in implementing it as well as developments concerning future security arrangements involving Parliament and the Board.
Obe strani po potrebi prilagodita sporazum glede na izkušnje z njegovim izvajanjem ter razvojem dogodkov glede prihodnje varnostne ureditve Evropskega parlamenta in odbora.
This Agreement shall enter into force on the day after its signature.
Ta sporazum začne veljati dan po podpisu.
The obligations concerning confidentiality of information shall continue to be binding on the two parties to this Agreement even after the termination of this Agreement.
Obveznosti glede zaupnosti informacij so za obe strani zavezujoče tudi po prenehanju veljavnosti tega sporazuma.
This Agreement shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Sporazum se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Done at Brussels and at Strasbourg, 16 December 2015.
V Bruslju in Strasbourgu, 16. decembra 2015
For the Single Resolution Board
Za Enotni odbor za reševanje
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43).
Uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije (UL L 145, 31.5.2001, str. 43).
Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012, of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190).
Direktiva 2014/59/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o vzpostavitvi okvira za sanacijo ter reševanje kreditnih institucij in investicijskih podjetij ter o spremembi Šeste direktive Sveta 82/891/EGS ter direktiv 2001/24/ES, 2002/47/ES, 2004/25/ES, 2005/56/ES, 2007/36/ES, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU in 2013/36/EU in uredb (EU) št. 1093/2010 ter (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 173, 12.6.2014, str. 190).
Decision 95/167/EC, Euratom, ECSC of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 19 April 1995 on the detailed provisions governing the exercise of the European Parliament's right of inquiry (OJ L 78, 6.4.1995, p. 1).
Sklep 95/167/ES, Euratom, ESPJ Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije z dne 19. aprila 1995 o določbah, ki podrobneje urejajo uresničevanje preiskovalne pravice Evropskega parlamenta (UL L 78, 6.4.1995, str. 1).
supplementing Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the periodic reporting on fees charged by credit rating agencies for the purpose of ongoing supervision by the European Securities and Markets Authority
o dopolnitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede regulativnih tehničnih standardov za redno poročanje o zaračunanih honorarjih bonitetnih agencij z namenom neprekinjenega nadzora s strani Evropskega organa za vrednostne papirje in trge
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies [1], and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 21(4a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o bonitetnih agencijah [1] in zlasti tretjega pododstavka člena 21(4a) Uredbe,
Article 11(3) and point 2 of Part II of Section E of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 require a credit rating agency to annually disclose to ESMA the list of fees charged to each client for individual credit ratings and any ancillary services, as well as its pricing policy, including the fees structure and pricing criteria in relation to credit ratings for different asset classes.
Bonitetne agencije morajo v skladu s členom 11(3) in točko 2 dela II oddelka E Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1060/2009 organu ESMA letno razkriti seznam honorarjev, zaračunanih vsaki stranki za posamezne bonitetne ocene in morebitne pomožne storitve, ter uporabljeno politiko oblikovanja cen, vključno s strukturo honorarjev in merili za oblikovanje cen v zvezi z bonitetnimi ocenami za različne razrede finančnih instrumentov.
It is essential to provide for the technical details regarding the content to be reported and the format to be used by credit rating agencies in order to comply with their obligations and to allow ESMA to exercise its ongoing supervisory powers.
Določiti je treba tehnične podrobnosti glede vsebine, ki se bo poročala, in obliko, v kateri bodo bonitetne agencije sporočale informacije, da bi izpolnile svoje obveznosti, organu ESMA pa je treba omogočiti, da izvaja svoja pooblastila glede stalnega nadzora.
In order to mitigate conflicts of interest and facilitate fair competition in the credit rating market, ESMA should ensure that pricing policies, procedures and ultimately fees charged by credit rating agencies to clients are not discriminatory.
Zaradi zmanjševanja navzkrižij interesov in spodbujanja poštene konkurence na trgu bonitetnega ocenjevanja bi moral organ ESMA zagotoviti, da politike oblikovanja cen, postopki in honorarji, ki jih bonitetne agencije zaračunavajo strankam, niso diskriminatorni.
Differences in fees charged for the same type of service should be justifiable by a difference in the actual costs in providing the service to different clients.
Razlike med honorarji, zaračunanimi za isto vrsto storitve, bi morale biti upravičene, kadar gre za razlike pri dejanskih stroških opravljanja takšne storitve za različne stranke.
Moreover, the fees charged for credit rating services to a given issuer should not depend on the results or outcome of the work performed.
Honorarji, ki so za storitve bonitetnega ocenjevanja zaračunani zadevnemu izdajatelju, ne bi smeli biti odvisni od rezultatov opravljenega dela.
The fee information to be submitted by registered credit rating agencies should allow ESMA to identify credit ratings that would require more in-depth scrutiny and possible further supervisory follow-up actions.
Informacije o honorarjih, ki jih morajo predložiti registrirane bonitetne agencije, bi morale organu ESMA omogočiti, da prepozna bonitetne ocene, ki jih je treba podrobneje proučiti in morda v zvezi s tem sprejeti nadaljnje nadzorne ukrepe.
Similar fees should be charged for credit ratings and ancillary services with similar features, differences in fee levels being justified on the basis of cost differences.
Za bonitetne ocene in pomožne storitve s podobnimi značilnostmi bi se morali zaračunavati podobni honorarji, razlike med višino honorarjev pa bi bile upravičene le na podlagi razlik v stroških.
The information collected should allow ESMA to identify, for each registered credit rating agency, comparable services and their respective fees and therefore to detect any significant deviations in fees charged.
Zbrane informacije bi morale organu ESMA omogočiti, da za vsako posamezno bonitetno agencijo opredeli primerljive storitve in zadevne honorarje ter tako ugotovi vsako večje odstopanje pri zaračunanih honorarjih.
ESMA can thereafter undertake investigations to verify that any such fees are set according to lawful pricing policies and procedures and differences in fee levels based on cost differences are consistent with the principles of fair competition, are not due to conflicts of interest and do not depend on the results or outcome of the work performed.
ESMA lahko nato izvede preiskavo, s katero preveri, da so zadevni honorarji določeni v skladu z zakonitimi politikami in postopki oblikovanja cen ter, so razlike v višini honorarjev, ki temeljijo na razlikah v stroških, v skladu z načeli poštene konkurence, da niso posledica navzkrižij interesov ter niso odvisne od rezultatov opravljenega dela.
Pricing policies and procedures should be reported for each rating type.
Politike in postopke oblikovanja cen bi bilo treba sporočiti za vsako vrsto bonitetne ocene.
For reporting purposes and in order to clearly distinguish each pricing policy and procedure and their respective updates, each version of the pricing policies with its respective fee schedules, fee programmes and procedures should have an identification number.
Zaradi poročanja in jasnega razlikovanja med posameznimi politikami in postopki oblikovanja cen ter njihovimi zadevnimi posodobitvami bi morala imeti vsaka različica politik oblikovanja cen z zadevnimi ceniki storitev, programi in postopki plačevanja honorarjev svojo identifikacijsko številko.
For all other purposes, the pricing policies should include the fee structures or fee schedules as well as the pricing criteria that can be applied by the person or persons negotiating the fees to be charged for an individual credit rating.
Politike oblikovanja cen bi morale za vse druge namene vključevati strukture honorarjev ali cenike storitev ter merila za oblikovanje cen, ki jih lahko uporabi oseba ali osebe, ki se pogajajo o honorarjih, ki se bodo zaračunali za posamezno bonitetno oceno.
The pricing policies should also include any frequency or other fee programmes from which the rated entity or subscriber may benefit in terms of different fees charged for an individual rating or a set of credit ratings.
Politike oblikovanja cen bi morale vključevati tudi program pogostosti ali kateri drugi program honorarjev, na podlagi katerega ima lahko ocenjevani subjekt ali naročnik korist v smislu drugačnih honorarjev, zaračunanih za posamezno bonitetno oceno ali sklop bonitetnih ocen.
Credit rating agencies should record all instances of where the pricing policies, fee schedules, fee programmes and procedures have not been applied and all instances of deviations from the pricing policy as applied to an individual credit rating, with a clear identification of the credit rating involved.
Bonitetne agencije bi morale zabeležiti vse primere, v katerih se niso uporabili politike oblikovanja cen, ceniki storitev, programi in postopki plačevanja honorarjev ter vse primere odstopanj od politike oblikovanja cen, ki je bila uporabljena pri posamezni bonitetni oceni, zadevna bonitetna ocena pa bi morala biti jasno navedena.
Registered credit rating agencies that are part of a group should be able to either report their ratings data separately to ESMA or mandate one of the other credit rating agencies within the group to submit the data on behalf of all group members that are subject to the reporting requirements.
Registrirane bonitetne agencije, ki so del skupine, bi morale biti sposobne podatke o bonitetnih ocenah sporočati organu ESMA ločeno ali eno od drugih agencij v skupini bonitetnih agencij pooblastiti, da podatke predloži v imenu vseh članic skupine, za katere se zahteva poročanje.
For the purpose of this Regulation, the ‘structuring of a debt issue’ and ‘debt issue’ should include financial instruments or other assets resulting from a securitisation transaction or scheme referred to in Article 4(61) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
„Strukturiranje izdaje dolžniških instrumentov“ in „izdaja dolžniških instrumentov“ bi morala za namene te uredbe vključevati finančne instrumente ali druga sredstva, ki izhajajo posla ali sheme listinjenja iz člena 4(61) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2].
In order to enable registered credit rating agencies to develop adequate systems and procedures following the technical specifications provided by ESMA and to ensure complete and correct reporting on fees data, registered credit rating agencies should initially report on individual fees data nine months after the entry into force of this Regulation.
Da bi registrirane bonitetne agencije lahko razvile ustrezne sisteme in postopke v skladu s tehničnimi specifikacijami, ki jih zagotovi ESMA, ter da bi se zagotovilo popolno in pravilno poročanje podatkov o honorarjih, bi morale bonitetne agencije podatke o posameznih honorarjih prvič poročati devet mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
The initial report should be made in respect of fee data as from the entry into force of this Regulation.
Prvo poročilo bi se moralo nanašati na podatke o honorarjih od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Such obligation should not be construed as a discharge from the obligation on registered credit rating agencies to submit periodic information on fees in accordance with Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1060/2009 in the interim period.
Zadevna obveznost se ne bi smela razumeti kot oprostitev registriranih bonitetnih agencij obveznosti redne predložitve informacij o honorarjih v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1060/2009 v vmesnem obdobju.
Pricing policies and procedures should be provided on an ongoing basis so that any material changes are reported without undue delay after their adoption and at the latest 30 days after their implementation.
Politike in postopke oblikovanja cen bi bilo treba zagotavljati redno, da se pomembne spremembe sporočijo nemudoma po njihovem sprejetju in najpozneje 30 dni po njihovem izvajanju.
The information to be reported should be compiled in a standard format to allow ESMA to receive and process the records automatically in its internal systems.
Informacije, ki se bodo poročale, bi morale biti pripravljene v standardni obliki, da jih bo lahko ESMA prejela in samodejno obdelala v svojih notranjih sistemih.
Due to technical difficulties and technical progress over time, a number of technical reporting instructions concerning the transmission or the format of the files to be submitted by registered credit rating agencies might have to be updated and communicated by ESMA through specific communications or guidelines.
Zaradi tehničnih težav in tehničnega napredka bo morala ESMA morda posodobiti več tehničnih navodil za poročanje glede prenosa ali oblike datotek, ki jih morajo predložiti registrirane bonitetne agencije, in navodila sporočiti s posebnimi sporočili ali smernicami.