natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The model shall be considered to comply if, when installed according to the manufacturer's instructions, the lamps provide at least 1 % of their luminous flux at full load.
‚svetilka‘ pomeni izdelek, ki oddaja, filtrira ali pretvarja svetlobo, ki prihaja iz ene ali več sijalk in vključuje vse dele, potrebne za podporo, pritrditev in zaščito sijalk, ter po potrebi obsega pomožno opremo s sredstvi za povezavo te opreme z virom električnega napajanja.
If the model does not fulfil the applicable compliance criteria referred to above, it shall be considered not to comply.
Če prvotni namen izdelka ni razsvetljevanje in je izdelek za opravljanje svojega prvotnega namena med uporabo odvisen od dovoda energije (na primer hladilniki, šivalni stroji, endoskopi, aparati za analizo krvi), za namene te uredbe ne šteje kot svetilka.“;
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1429
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1429
of 26 August 2015
z dne 26. avgusta 2015
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People's Republic of China and Taiwan
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Tajvana
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1], and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], in zlasti člena 9(4) Uredbe,
The European Commission (‘the Commission’) by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/501 [2] (‘the provisional Regulation’) imposed provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’) and Taiwan (‘the countries concerned’).
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) 2015/501 [2] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) in Tajvana („zadevni državi“).
Following a request by the complainant supported by the required evidence, the Commission adopted on 15 December 2014 Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1331/2014 [3] making imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the PRC and Taiwan subject to registration as of 17 December 2014 (‘the Registration regulation’).
Komisija je 15. decembra 2014 na podlagi zahtevka pritožnika, utemeljenega z zahtevanimi dokazi, sprejela Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1331/2014 [3] o obvezni registraciji uvoza hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Tajvana („uredba o registraciji“), ki se uporablja od 17. decembra 2014.
Interested parties claimed that the decision for registration of imports was unfounded, as the conditions were not met pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
Zainteresirane strani so trdile, da je odločitev o registraciji uvoza neutemeljena, saj niso bili izpolnjeni pogoji v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe.
At the time the decision was taken to register imports the Commission had sufficient prima facie evidence justifying the need to register imports: imports and market shares from these countries sharply increased.
Ob sprejetju sklepa o registraciji uvoza je imela Komisija zadostne dokaze prima facie, s katerimi je utemeljila potrebo po registraciji uvoza: uvoz in tržni deleži iz teh držav so se skokovito povečali.
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose provisional anti-dumping measures (‘the provisional disclosure’), several interested parties made written submissions making known their views on the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta odločitev o uvedbi začasnih protidampinških ukrepov („začasno razkritje“), je več zainteresiranih strani predložilo pisna stališča v zvezi z začasnimi ugotovitvami.
The Hearing Officer in trade proceeding was also available, upon request by any interested party, to verify how confidential information had been used by the Commission services responsible for the investigation.
Po proučitvi ustnih in pisnih pripomb zainteresiranih strani so bile začasne ugotovitve ustrezno spremenjene, kjer je bilo to potrebno.
The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Poleg tega so bili v prostorih naslednjih družb opravljeni preveritveni obiski:
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and, where appropriate, the provisional findings were modified accordingly.
proizvajalca iz primerljive države:
In addition, verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
AK Steel Corporation, Ohio, ZDA,
Analogue country producers:
NAS North American Stainless, Kentucky, ZDA;
AK Steel Corporation, Ohio, USA
nepovezani uvozniki:
NAS North American Stainless, Kentucky, USA
Acciai Vender S.p.A., Parma, Italija,
Unrelated importers:
Inox Market Service S.R.L, Padova, Italija,
Acciai Vender SpA, Parma, Italy
Nova Trading S.A., Torun, Poljska;
Inox Market Service S.R.L, Padova, Italy
uporabnika:
Nova Trading SA, Torun, Poland
Franke S.p.A., Peschiera del Garda, Italija,
Users:
Indesit Company S.p.A., Fabriano, Italija.
Franke SpA, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
Vse zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih sta se nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz zadevnih držav ter dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo („dokončno razkritje“).
Indesit Company SpA, Fabriano, Italy
Za vse strani je bil določen rok za pošiljanje pripomb v zvezi z dokončnim razkritjem.
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of SSCR originating in the countries concerned and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of provisional duty (‘the final disclosure’).
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani so se proučile in, kadar je bilo primerno, upoštevale.
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the final disclosure.
Vzorčenje
The comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Ena družba je nasprotovala ugotovitvi iz uvodne izjave 14 začasne uredbe, da ni proizvajalec izvoznik.
Sampling
Vendar ni predložila dodatnih informacij, na podlagi katerih bi lahko Komisija spremenila svoje stališče iz začasne uredbe, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 14 začasne uredbe.
One company contested the finding in recital 14 of the provisional Regulation that it was not an exporting producer.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z metodo vzorčenja proizvajalcev Unije, izvoznikov proizvajalcev v LRK in na Tajvanu ter nepovezanih uvoznikov, se potrdijo začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od 7 do 22 začasne uredbe.
However, the company did not provide any additional information that could change the position taken by the Commission in the provisional Regulation as described in recital 14 of the provisional Regulation.
Obdobje preiskave in obravnavano obdobje
In the absence of other comments concerning the method of sampling of Union producers, exporting producers in the PRC and Taiwan and unrelated importers, the provisional findings in recitals 7 to 22 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 25 začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2013 do 31. decembra 2013 („obdobje preiskave“).
Investigation period and period considered
Proučevanje trendov, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2010 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
As stated in recital 25 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013 (‘the investigation period’).
ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2010 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Uvod
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
Kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi 26 začasne uredbe, so zadevni izdelek ploščato valjani izdelki iz nerjavnega jekla, hladno valjani (hladno deformirani), brez nadaljnje obdelave, s poreklom iz LRK in Tajvana, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN 72193100, 72193210, 72193290, 72193310, 72193390, 72193410, 72193490, 72193510, 72193590, 72202021, 72202029, 72202041, 72202049, 72202081 in 72202089 („zadevni izdelek“).
Introduction
Hladno valjani ploščati izdelki iz nerjavnega jekla se uporabljajo v različne namene, na primer pri proizvodnji gospodinjskih aparatov (na primer notranjosti pralnih strojev in pomivalnih strojev), varjenih cevi in medicinskih pripomočkov ter v živilskopredelovalni in avtomobilski industriji.
As set out in recital 26 of the provisional Regulation, the product concerned is flat-rolled products of stainless steel, not further worked than cold-rolled (cold-reduced) originating in the PRC and Taiwan, currently falling within CN codes 72193100, 72193210, 72193290, 72193310, 72193390, 72193410, 72193490, 72193510, 72193590, 72202021, 72202029, 72202041, 72202049, 72202081 and 72202089 (‘the product concerned’).
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo vse različne vrste zadevnega izdelka enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter se uporabljajo v enake namene.
Stainless steel cold-rolled flat products are used in a wide range of applications, for example in the production of household appliances (for example the interior of washing machines and dishwashers), welded tubes and medical devices as well as in the food processing and automotive industries.
Trditve glede obsega izdelka
The investigation has shown that the different types of the product concerned all share the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and are basically used for the same purposes.
Zainteresirane strani so ponovile svoje trditve, navedene v začasni fazi, da bi bilo treba tanke in natančne trakove izključiti iz obsega preiskave.
Claims regarding the product scope
Ponovile so svojo trditev, da se je Generalni direktorat Komisije za konkurenco v svoji analizi zadeve o združitvi Outokumpu/INOXUM [4] odločil, da bo to vrsto izdelka izključil z ustreznega trga proizvodov.
Interested parties reiterated their claims brought forward at the provisional stage that narrow and precision strips should be excluded from the scope of the investigation.
Poleg tega so zainteresirane strani trdile, da je zamenljivost „standardnih“ hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla in natančnih trakov pri povpraševanju in ponudbi omejena.
They reiterated their claim that the Directorate-General for Competition of the Commission had decided to exclude this product type from the relevant product market in its analysis of the Outokumpu/Inoxum merger case [4].
Vendar, kot je bilo že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 31 začasne uredbe, je opredelitev trga v primeru protidampinga opredeljena na podlagi fizikalnih lastnosti zadevnega izdelka, ne pa na podlagi zamenljivosti pri povpraševanju in ponudbi.
In addition, interested parties argued that both demand-side and supply-side substitution between ‘standard’ SSCR and precision strips is limited.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran ponovila svojo trditev, da je opredelitev trga v zadevi o združitvi pomembna za opredelitev izdelka v primeru protidampinga.
However, as already stated in recital 31 of the provisional Regulation, the market definition in an anti-dumping case is defined by the physical characteristics of the product concerned and not the demand-side and supply-side substitution.
To trditev je podkrepila z navedbo, da lahko institucije EU poleg fizikalnih, tehničnih in kemijskih lastnosti izdelka upoštevajo številne druge dejavnike, kot so uporaba, medsebojna zamenljivost, dojemanje potrošnikov, distribucijska veriga, proizvodni postopek, stroški proizvodnje in kakovost.
Following final disclosure, one interested party reiterated their claim that the market definition in a merger case is relevant for the product definition in an anti-dumping case.
Štirje parametri, tj. „uporaba, medsebojna zamenljivost, dojemanje potrošnikov in proizvodni postopek“, naj bi bili sinonimi za zamenljivost pri povpraševanju in ponudbi.
In support of this argument, they state that in addition to physical, technical and chemical characteristics of the product, the EU institutions may take account of a number of other factors such as use, interchangeability, consumer perception, distribution channels, manufacturing process, cost of production and quality.
Brez ocenjevanja trditve, ali so „uporaba, medsebojna zamenljivost, dojemanje potrošnikov in proizvodni postopek“ dejansko sinonimi za zamenljivost pri povpraševanju in ponudbi, sezam navedenih elementov precej presega ta štiri merila.
Allegedly, the four parameters ‘use, interchangeability, consumer perception and manufacturing process’ are synonymous with demand-side and supply-side substitution.
Trditve, da je opredelitev trga v zadevi o združitvi pomembna za opredelitev izdelka v primeru protidampinga, zato ni mogoče sprejeti.
Without assessing the claim whether ‘use, interchangeability, consumer perception and manufacturing process’ are indeed synonymous with demand-side and supply-side substitution, the list of elements given above goes far beyond these four criteria.
Po dokončnem razkritju je še ena zainteresirana stran trdila, da je treba pri oceni tega, ali natančni trakovi spadajo na področje opredelitve zadevnega izdelka, upoštevati dejstvo, da industrija Unije „v preteklosti“ domnevno ni mogla prodajati tovrstnega izdelka.
The argument that the market definition in a merger case is relevant for the product definition in an anti-dumping case cannot therefore be accepted.
V zvezi s tem je v uvodni izjavi 30 začasne uredbe jasno navedeno, da lahko industrija Unije ta tržni segment oskrbi v celoti.
Following final disclosure, another interested party claimed that in the assessment of whether precision strips should fall under the definition of the product concerned, the issue that the Union industry was allegedly not able to sell this product type ‘in the past’ should be taken into account.
Brez natančnejše opredelitve pojma „v preteklosti“ ni mogoče preveriti, ali je ta trditev točna glede na dejstva ali sploh ustrezna.
In this respect, recital 30 of the provisional Regulation clearly states that the Union industry is able to fully supply this market segment.
V vsakem primeru imajo natančni trakovi in zadevni izdelek enake osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemijske lastnosti.
Without any more precise definition of ‘in the past’, it is impossible to check whether this claim is factually correct or even relevant.
Zainteresirana stran je trdila, da naj bi Komisija diskriminirala del trga, ker ni izključila posebnih izdelkov, čeprav uvoz teh izdelkov predstavlja manj kot 1 % celotnega uvoza, kot je navedla Komisija v uvodni izjavi 101 začasne uredbe.
In any event, precision strips share the basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics of the product concerned.
Ta stran je trdila, da družbe, ki trgujejo s posebnimi izdelki, za te izdelke domnevno niso našle drugih dobaviteljev.
An interested party claimed that even if imports of speciality products account for less than 1 % of the total imports, as the Commission set out in recital 101 of the provisional Regulation, allegedly the Commission discriminated part of the market by not excluding them.
Tega niso nadalje utemeljili.
This party argued that the companies that deal with speciality products would allegedly not find other suppliers for these speciality products.
V zvezi s tem je treba omeniti, da se pri navedbi iz uvodne izjave 101 začasne uredbe ni upoštevalo sobesedilo.
No further substantiation was provided.
Navedba je bila napisana v okviru kumulativne ocene uvoza iz LRK in Tajvana, ne pa v zvezi z obsegom izdelka v preiskavi.
In this respect, it is noted that the statement in recital 101 of the provisional Regulation is taken out of context.
Dejansko se ne oporeka temu, da imajo ti posebni izdelki enake osnove fizikalne lastnosti kot „standardni“ hladno valjani ploščati izdelki iz nerjavnega jekla.
The statement was made in the context of cumulative assessment of imports from the PRC and Taiwan, not in respect of the product scope of the investigation.
Zato je Komisija te trditve zavrnila in ni spremenila obsega izdelka v preiskavi.
Indeed, it is not disputed that these speciality products share the same basic physical characteristics as the ‘standard’ SSCR.
Sklep
The Commission therefore rejected these claims and maintained the product scope of the investigation unchanged.
Potrdijo se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od 26 do 32 začasne uredbe.
Conclusion
DAMPING
The provisional findings in recitals 26 to 32 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
LRK
DUMPING
Tržnogospodarska obravnava („TGO“)
The PRC
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 34 začasne uredbe, nihče od proizvajalcev izvoznikov, na katere se ta preiskava nanaša, ni zahteval TGO.
Market economy treatment (‘MET’)
Primerljiva država
As explained in recital 34 of the provisional Regulation, none of the exporting producers concerned by this investigation claimed MET.
V začasni uredbi so bile kot primerna primerljiva država izbrane Združene države Amerike („ZDA“) v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Analogue country
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika sta trdila, da ZDA niso primerna primerljiva država za določanje normalne vrednosti, zato ker imajo LRK in ZDA različen proizvodni proces in ker uporabljajo različne surovine.
In the provisional Regulation, the United States of America (‘USA’) were selected as an appropriate analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je en proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je Tajvan primernejša izbira za primerljivo državo, saj so stroški proizvodnje kitajskih obdelovalnih strojev mnogo bližji tajvanskim kot tistim v ZDA.
Two exporting producers claimed that the USA is not a suitable analogue country for the purpose of establishing the normal value due to the fact that the production process and the raw materials used are different in the PRC and in the USA.
Po njegovem mnenju je razlog v tem, da večji tajvanski proizvajalci hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla uporabljajo znatne količine vmesnih materialov, kot so črni kolobarji iz LRK.
In addition, one exporting producer argued that Taiwan is a better choice for the analogue country, since the cost of production of Chinese mills is much closer to the one of Taiwanese mills than it is to the one of USA mills.
Navedeni črni kolobarji so izdelani iz nikljevega surovega železa, tj. surovine, ki jo skoraj izključno uporabljajo v LRK.
According to the exporting producer, this is because major Taiwanese SSCR producers use substantial quantities of intermediate materials, namely black coils from the PRC.
Drug izvoznik proizvajalec je trdil, da so proizvajalci iz ZDA tako ali drugače povezani z nekaterimi proizvajalci Unije in da dejanske ugotovitve glede velikosti trga v ZDA niso točne.
Those black coils are made from nickel pig iron (‘NPI’), the raw material used almost exclusively in the PRC.
Med ZDA in LRK dejansko obstajajo razlike v viru niklja, ene od primarnih surovin v proizvodnji hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla.
Another exporting producer claimed that the producers in the USA are in one way or another related to certain Union producers and that the factual findings regarding the size of the market in the USA are inaccurate.
Medtem ko proizvajalci hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla v obeh državah uporabljajo določene količine t. i. utility niklja, so glavni vir niklja v ZDA odpadki iz nerjavnega jekla, v LRK pa nikljevo surovo železo.
Differences between the USA and the PRC in the sourcing of nickel, one of the primary raw materials in the production of SSCR, do indeed exist.
Vendar ZDA zaradi take razlike v tem primeru niso neprimerna primerljiva država, saj so končni izdelki, proizvedeni v ZDA in LRK, še vedno primerljivi, kot je ugotovljeno v uvodni izjavi 29 začasne uredbe in uvodni izjavi 15 zgoraj.
Whilst in both countries the SSCR producers use certain quantities of utility nickel, stainless steel scrap is the main source of nickel in the USA and NPI in the PRC.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 39 in 40 začasne uredbe, se ZDA štejejo za primerno primerljivo državo na podlagi določenih meril.
However, such a difference does not render the USA an inappropriate analogue country in this case, as the final products produced in the USA and in the PRC are still comparable as found in recital 29 of the provisional regulation and in recital 15 above.
Ob upoštevanju velikosti in ravni konkurence na trgu hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla v ZDA ter razpoložljivosti sodelovanja le dveh držav, različnih virov niklja in drugačnih proizvodnih procesov se izbira ZDA ne ovrže.
As explained in recitals 39 and 40 of the provisional Regulation, the USA is considered an appropriate analogue country on the basis of certain criteria.
Po drugi strani pa trditev, ki temelji na uporabi nikljevega surovega železa in povezanih proizvodnih procesov v LRK, vpliva na primernost Tajvana kot druge primerljive države ter prav tako vsake druge države na svetu.
In light of the size of and the level of competition on the SSCR market in the USA, as well as taking into account the available cooperation of only two countries, the differences in the sourcing of nickel and the production process, do not invalidate the choice of the USA.
Nikljevo surovo železo se proizvaja ter zaradi izvoznih ovir trži in uporablja skoraj izključno v LRK.
On the other hand, an argument based on the use of NPI and the related production process in the PRC affects the appropriateness of Taiwan as an alternative analogue country as well as any other country in the world in the same manner.
Iz tega izhaja ugotovitev, da se nikljevo surovo železo na Tajvanu, tj. drugi primerljivi državi, ne uporablja.
NPI is produced and, due to export barriers, traded and used almost exclusively in the PRC.
Glavna surovina pri proizvodnji zadevnega izdelka na Tajvanu so t. i utility nikelj in, kot je navedel eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov, črni kolobarji, kupljeni v glavnem v LRK.
It follows, and it was established, that NPI is not used in Taiwan, the alternative analogue country.
Kot je prav tako navedeno v uvodni izjavi 39 začasne uredbe, so surovine, ki se uporabljajo v ZDA in Tajvanu, večinoma enake.
The main raw materials used in the production of the product concerned in Taiwan are utility nickel and, as noted by one of the exporting producers, black coils purchased mainly from the PRC.
Poleg tega se lahko v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe zahtevajo prilagoditve, da bi se upoštevale določene razlike, pod pogojem, da se dokaže vpliv na cene in je prilagoditev utemeljena, pri čemer se upošteva uporaba primerljive države v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
As also stated in recital 39 of the provisional Regulation the raw materials used in the USA and Taiwan are mainly the same.
Drugič, glede stroškov proizvodnje tajvanskega proizvajalca, ki uporablja črne kolobarje, kupljene v LRK, so bili zadevni črni kolobarji kupljeni pri povezanem dobavitelju v LRK, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 76 začasne uredbe.