natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Spain shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
Prav tako je treba poudariti, da na preiskovanih oddaljenih in manj urbaniziranih območjih v Španiji („Območje II“) ni bilo vedno mogoče zagotoviti televizijskega signala prek platforme digitalne prizemne televizije, zato je bil na nekaterih območjih izbran satelitski prenos, in sicer za prenos med centri in tudi prenos do nekaterih gospodinjstev (za več informacij glej oddelek 2.2.2.).
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Spain shall submit the following information:
V tem sklepu se vse te namestitve še vedno obravnavajo kot „prizemne“.
for the beneficiaries identified in Article 1, the total amount of aid received by each of them;
Glej Sklep št. 243/2012/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. marca 2012 o vzpostavitvi večletnega programa politike radijskega spektra, zlasti člen 6(4) (UL L 81, 21.3.2012, str.
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
7).
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
Približno 26 nacionalnih nekodiranih kanalov in približno 30 regionalnih nekodiranih kanalov.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
Vzpostavila je obveznost, da morajo zasebni izdajatelji televizijskega programa na svojem območju pokritja do navedenega datuma doseči 96 % prebivalstva, medtem ko so morali javni izdajatelji televizijskega programa na svojem območju pokritja doseči 98 % prebivalstva.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Zato državna pomoč ni bila potrebna.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Pozneje razdeljeni v faze I, II in III.
Article 5
Odločitev o razporeditvi sredstev za razvoj širokopasovne televizije in digitalizacijo televizije na območju II je bila prepuščena regionalnim organom.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.
Okvirni sporazumi med MITT in avtonomnimi skupnostmi so bili leta 2006 podpisani v okviru načrta Avanza.
For the Commission
Skupaj je bilo med organi v zvezi z razširitvijo pokritja sklenjenih več kot 600 sporazumov – okvirnih sporazumov, dodatkov itd.
http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2005/06/15/pdfs/A20562-20567.pdf
Za primerjavo glej Prilogi II – Notranja študija JCCM o izvajanju Nacionalnega načrta prehoda na digitalno prizemno televizijo v Kastilji in Manči, str. 31.
http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2005/07/30/pdfs/A27006-27014.pdf
Vlada Kastilje in Manče: Izvajanje načrta prehoda na digitalno prizemno televizijo v Kastilji in Manči, predstavitev Evropske komisije, 27. oktobra 2010.
Commission Decision 2014/489/EU of 19 June 2013 on State aid SA.28599 (C 23/10 (ex NN 36/10, ex CP 163/09)) implemented by the Kingdom of Spain for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less urbanised areas (outside Castilla-La Mancha) (OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p.
Sporazum o sodelovanju med JCCM in občino Caspueñas, str. 76.
52).
Vendar je v primeru treh sporazumov o sodelovanju družba Abertis ostala lastnica opreme digitalne prizemne televizije.
Astra challenged the termination of the contract before a court of first instance in Santander (procedure nr.
Občinski organi so za posodobitev svojih omrežij družbama TelecomCLM in Abertis plačali 32,6 milijona EUR.
1728/2009), which on 23 December 2011 ordered the Cantabrian authorities to indemnify Astra for the unjustified termination of the contract.
Sporazumi o sodelovanju zajemajo dve leti upravljanja in vzdrževanja.
The Court did not find any breach of agreement on the side of Astra that would justify the termination of the agreement.
To znaša 4,5 milijona EUR za občinske organe in 2 milijona EUR za operaterje.
According to the Court, the decision of the Spanish central government to develop the national strategy for DTT was one of the reasons for the termination of the agreement.
Notranja študija JCCM o izvajanju Nacionalnega načrta prehoda na digitalno prizemno televizijo v Kastilji in Manči, str. 53.
See judgment 000313/2011 of the Court of First Instance in Santander.
Glej zlasti sodbi v zadevi T-21/06, Nemčija proti Komisiji, (DVB-T Brandenburg), ZOdl.
Internet Protocol Television is a term to refer to distribution systems of TV and video signals through an electronic communications network using internet Protocol.
II-197, točka 69 in zadevi T-177/07, Mediaset SpA proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on transforming the digital dividend into social benefits and economic growth (COM(2009) 586) recommended that the Member States should cease using the 800 MHz band for high-power broadcasting services and fully implement the EU technical harmonisation decision by a certain date agreed at the EU level.
2010, str.
See for instance, for France Aide d'Etat N 666/2009 — Modification du régime d'aides à la TNT 111/2006, for Slovakia State aid N 671/2009 switch-over to digital TV broadcasting in Slovakia.
II-2341.
In Spain: State aid SA.28685 (2011/NN) Reception of digital television in Cantabria.
V primeru Kastilje in Manče organi niso oporekali temu, da je treba ukrep obravnavati kot storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
It should also be noted that in Spain in remote and less urbanised areas under investigation (so-called Area II) it was not always viable to provide TV signal via DTT platform and therefore satellite transmission was chosen in some cases, both for the transmission between the centres and for transmission to some households (in more detail see chapter 2.2.2.).
Prav tako ne bi izpolnil meril iz sodbe Altmark, saj med drugim ni akta o pooblastitvi, upravičenci niso bili izbrani na podlagi odprtega razpisa in organ nadomestila ni izračunal na podlagi stroškov, ki bi jih plačalo podjetje z dobrim upravljanjem za opravljanje takšnih storitev.
For the purpose of this decision, all of these installations are still considered to be ‘terrestrial’.
Občinski organi so v zadnjih desetletjih prvotno vzpostavili lastne centre za analogno razpošiljanje signala.
See Decision No 243/2012/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 establishing a multiannual radio spectrum policy programme and in particular Article 6(4) therein (OJ L 81, 21.3.2012, p.
Prejeli so javno financiranje za digitalizacijo te infrastrukture.
7).
Predložitev vlade Kastilje in Manče Evropski komisiji (zadeva C24/2010) – uvedba digitalne prizemne televizije na oddaljenih in manj urbaniziranih območjih v Kastilji in Manči, poslano dne 6. junija 2014.
See Commission Decision SA.32619 — Compensation of damages for the liberation of digital dividend (OJ C 213, 19.7.2012, p.
Vendar je to v nasprotju z dokumenti, ki jih je predložila Španija.
41).
Člen 7 sporazuma o prenosu opreme digitalne prizemne televizije med družbo TelecomCLM in JCCM na primer navaja storitve digitalne prizemne televizije, ki jih zagotavlja operater na območju II.
Due to the complexity of the reorganisation of services and spectrum use, Spain asked for derogation to the date of implementation of Article 6(4) of Decision No 243/2012/EU.
Poleg tega, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 73, je JCCM sama trdila, da je treba družbi Abertis in TelecomCLM obravnavati kot operaterja omrežja na območju II.
Around 26 national FTA channels and around 30 regional channels.
To je tudi v nasprotju z dejavnostmi operaterjev, kot so podrobno opisane v uvodnih izjavah 113 do 120.
It established the obligation of private broadcasters to reach by that date 96 % of the population in their respective areas of coverage, while public broadcasters should reach 98 % of the population in their respective areas of coverage.
Dr. Julian Seseña: „Extensión de la cobertura de la señal TDT en Castilla – La Mancha: Estudio comparativo socio-económico de opciones tecnológicas“, september 2008, izvedeno za regionalno vlado Kastilje in Manče (JCCM).
In this Area I the broadcasters had the obligation to cover these percentages of population with the terrestrial digital television, and they had to bear the costs of digitisation themselves.
Poleg tega JCCM trdi, da poznejša naknadna primerjalna razčlenitev stroškov potrjuje sklep, da bi bila prizemna rešitev boljša od satelitske rešitve.
Hence, no State aid was necessary.
Ta razčlenitev se ujema s študijami, ki jih je JCCM že pred tem predložila Komisiji, in kaže, da čeprav je bila prvotna naložba za prizemno rešitev nekoliko višja od naložbe v satelitsko rešitev, bi bila prizemna rešitev od četrtega lega gospodarsko učinkovitejša od platforme, ki jo je ponudila Astra.
http://www.televisiondigital.es/Documents/PlanNacionalTransicionTDT.pdf
Za ta izračun je JCCM uporabila predpostavke stroškov, ki jih je Astra predstavila v memorandumu z dne 10. novembra 2011.
Further classified in Phases I, II and III.
Trenutno je na seznamu v evidenci okrog 900 operaterjev.
http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2008/03/06/pdfs/A13832-13834.pdf
JCCM se je odločila namestiti satelitske storitve v redko poseljenih središčih na območju II, kjer ni centra za razpošiljanje signala ali so bili stroški digitalizacije obstoječe prizemne infrastrukture previsoki.
The decision regarding the distribution of funds to the development of broadband and to digitisation of television in Area II was left to the regional authorities.
Z občinskimi organi se je sklenilo sto sporazumov o sodelovanju, kar je omogočilo namestitev satelitskim prejemnikov v vsako gospodinjstvo, to pa je bilo ceneje od vzpostavljanja novega centra za razpošiljanje signala.
The framework agreements were signed between MIEyT and the Autonomous Communities in 2006 within the framework of the Plan Avanza.
Razlog za to izključitev naj bi bila izognitev digitalizaciji centra, ki je bil že zajet v okviru uradne obveznosti za pokritje z digitalno prizemno televizijo, ki so jo imeli izdajatelji televizijskega programa na območju II.
http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2009/07/02/pdfs/BOE-A-2009-10972.pdf
dstotna pokritost prebivalstva v regiji bi se lahko (na podlagi določenih parametrov razpošiljanja signala) dosegla le z 8–12 centri za razpošiljanje signala, lociranimi na obdobjih glavnih mest v regiji.
See, for example, Andalucía's Addendum http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2009/10/28/pdfs/BOE-A-2009-17108.pdf
Družba Radiodifusión takih centrov nima.
In total more than 600 agreements — framework agreements, addenda etc. — were concluded between the authorities concerning the extension of coverage.
Vsi ti centri za razpošiljanje signala so bili v zadnjih 10 letih dozdevno del uradnega načrta pokritja za izdajatelje televizijskega programa.
The Government of Castilla-La Mancha concluded that it would not have the time necessary to organise a public tendering within the timeframe of the national Plan for the Transition to DTT.
Vendar noben nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni javni urad ne bi razmišljal o digitalizaciji takih centrov, saj so bili že vključeni v uradni načrt pokritja za razširitev digitalne prizemne televizije v regiji.
Compare: Annexes II — JCCM Internal Study on the implementation of the National plan for the Transition to DTT in Castilla La-Mancha, p. 31.
JCCM je predložil dva primera sporazumov o sodelovanju, sklenjenih z družbo Abertis.
Castilla-La Mancha Authority: The Implementation of the DTT Transition Plan in Castilla-La Mancha, presentation to the European Commission, 27 October 2010.
Odstavek 22 predložitve družbe Abertis Telecom z dne 31. januarja 2011.
Municipalities are equipment owners and they have to pay for Operation and Maintenance (O&M) cost for the first two years of operation.
Predpostavke študije se razlikujejo od predpostavk, ki jih Španija in Abertis navajata v zvezi z več vidiki, med drugim glede stroškov satelitskih krožnikov in nujnega nakupa zunanjih sprejemnikov za sprejem digitalne prizemne televizije.
Collaboration Agreement between the JCCM and the Municipality of Caspueñas, p. 76.
Študija ugotavlja, da razširitev pokritja prek satelita ne bi bila nujno dražja od razširitve ob uporabi prizemne tehnologije.
This was to ensure the provision of O&M of the DTT equipment beyond the 2-year period laid down in the Collaboration Agreements.
Ta študija navaja, da bi skupni stroški uporabe tehnologije digitalne prizemne televizije znašali okrog 286 milijonov EUR v desetletnem obdobju, medtem ko bi skupni stroški uporabe satelitske tehnologije v enakem obdobju znašali približno 532 milijonov EUR.
However, in the case of 3 collaboration agreements Abertis remained the owner of the DTT equipment.
SA.28599 – C(2013) 3204 final z dne 19. junija 2013.
To upgrade their networks, municipalities paid up to EUR 32,6 million to TelecomCLM and Abertis.
Take smernice so del zadevnih dokumentov centralne vlade.
Collaboration agreements cover 2 year O&M.
V okvirnih sporazumih, sklenjenih decembra 2008, z naslovom Okvirni sporazum o sodelovanju med Ministrstvom za industrijo, turizem in trgovino ter avtonomno skupnostjo […] za razvoj nacionalnega načrta prehoda na digitalno prizemno televizijo je zlasti določen seznam dejavnosti, ki jih bodo centralni in regionalni organi financirali, da bi dosegli pokritje z digitalno televizijo, enako obstoječemu pokritju z analogno televizijo.
In the case of municipalities this amounts to EUR 4,5 million and for operators to EUR 2 million.
Na eni strani navajajo obstoječe centre za razpošiljanje signala, ki so jih posodobili izdajatelji televizijskega programa (centri digitalne prizemne televizije na območju I), po drugi pa se sklicujejo na „razširjene lokacije pokritja“ – dodatne centre, ki jih bo treba uporabiti za zagotovitev enakega prodora digitalne televizije.
JCCM Internal Study on the implementation of the National plan for the Transition to DTT in Castilla La-Mancha, p.
Ker je za obstoj centrov za razpošiljanje signala potrebna zgolj digitalna prizemna tehnologija, se zdi očitno, da načrtovani ukrepi zadevajo le digitalno prizemno tehnologijo.
53.
Poleg tega se dodatki k okvirnim sporazumom, ki so bili podpisani med oktobrom in decembrom 2009, nanašajo na financiranje razširitve pokritja.
See in particular the judgments: DVB-T Brandenbourg, T-21/06, Germany against Commission, [2009] ECR II-00197, paragraph (69) and Mediaset SpA v Commission, T-177/07, [2010] ECR II-02341.
V opredelitvi pojma „dejanje za razširitev pokritja“ se izrecno sklicujejo zgolj na prizemno tehnologijo.
In the case of Castilla-La Mancha the authorities have not argued that the measure should be considered as an SGEI.
Na srečanjih z avtonomnimi skupnostmi je MITT izrazil, da si prizadeva zagotoviti digitalno prizemno televizijo tudi na območju II.
It would also not fulfil the Altmark criteria, as- among other reasons — there is no entrustment act, the beneficiaries were not selected on the basis of an open tender, nor has the authority calculated the compensation on the basis of the cost a well-run undertaking would face for delivering such services.
To potrjuje predstavitev, ki je javno dostopna na spletu in pod katero se je podpisalo MITT: http://www.fenitel.es/asamblea08/PONENCIAS/4SETSI.pdf.
Originally, municipalities had built and owned analogue transmitting centres over the last decades.
To potrjujejo tudi navedbe avtonomnih skupnosti, predložene kot odgovor na zahtevo Komisije po informacijah.
They received the public funding for digitisation of this infrastructure.
Avtonomne skupnosti se v svojih odgovorih izrecno sklicujejo na nacionalni načrt prehoda, ki je bil sprejet s Kraljevim odlokom št. 944/2005, in na načrt Avanza.
Junta de Castilla-La Mancha submission to the EC (case C24/2010) — deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less-urbanised areas in Castilla-La Mancha, submitted on 6 June 2014.
Glej na primer odgovor Estremadure: „V skladu s Kraljevim odlokom št. 944/2005 … o odobritvi nacionalnega tehničnega načrta za digitalno prizemno televizijo, ki določa lokalno pobudo v zvezi z razširitvijo pokritja z digitalno prizemno televizijo …“
This, however, is in contradiction with the documents provided by Spain.
Odločitve Komisije N 622/2003, Digitalisierungsfonds Avstrija, C25/2004, DVB-T Berlin Brandenburg (točka 62), C34/2006, DVB-T Severno Porenje-Vestfalija (točka 83), in C52/2005, Mediaset (točka 96).
For instance, article 7 of the DTT Equipment Transfer Agreement between TelecomCLM and the JCCM speaks about the DTT services provided by the operator in Area II.
Zadeva T-196/04, Ryanair Ltd proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, ZOdl.
Moreover, as set out in recital 73, JCCM itself has argued that Abertis and TelecomCLM should be considered network operators in Area II.
2007, str.
It is also in contradiction to the operators' activities as described in detail in recitals 113 to 120.
II-2379, točka 88.
Dr Julián Seseña ‘Extensión de la cobertura de la señal TDT en Castilla-La Mancha: Estudio comparativo socio-económico de opciones tecnológicas’, September 2008, study realised for the Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM).
Glej združeni zadevi T-443/08 in T-455/08, Freistaat Sachsen in Land Sachsen-Anhalt (T-443/08) in Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG in Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH (T-455/08) proti Evropski komisiji, ZOdl.
Furthermore, the JCCM argues that a later ‘ex post’ comparative cost breakdown would confirm the conclusion that the terrestrial solution would outweigh the satellite one.
2011, str.
This breakdown complements the studies previously submitted by JCCM to the Commission and would show that, even though the initial investment for the terrestrial solution was slightly higher than the satellite one, from the 4th year the terrestrial solution would have been more economically efficient than the platform offered by Astra.
II-1311, točka 115, v kateri Sodišče navaja: „[to], da neka dejavnost s strani zasebnih subjektov ni zagotovljena ali da ni dobičkonosna, nista upoštevni merili pri opredelitvi te dejavnosti za gospodarsko.“
For that calculation the JCCM used costs assumptions presented by Astra in a Memorandum of 10 November 2011.
Sporočilo Komisije o uporabi pravil Evropske unije o državni pomoči za nadomestilo, dodeljeno za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena (UL C 8, 11.1.2012, str.
Currently around 900 operators are listed in the Registry.
4).
JCCM decided to implement satellite in scarcely populated centres in Area II where there was no transmitting centre or the cost of digitising the existing terrestrial infrastructure was too high.
Zadevi C-364/92, SAT/Eurocontrol, Recueil 1994, str.
Agreements were concluded with municipalities and led to the installation ofsatellite receptors in each household, which was less costly than constructing a new transmitting centre.
I-43, točke 19 do 30, in C-113/07 P, Selex, ZOdl.
The rationale behind this exclusion was to avoid the digitisation of a centre which is already covered by the broadcasters' official DTT coverage obligation in Area I.
2009, str.
A 60 % population coverage in the region could only be achieved (based on certain transmitting parameters) with 8-12 emission centres located in the outskirts of the main cities of the region.Radiodifusión would not have such centres.
I-2207.
All those emission centres would take part, for the last 10years, in the official coverage plan for broadcasters.
Zadeva C-343/95, Calì & Figli, Recueil 1997, str.
However, no public Administration, national, regional or local, would consider the digitisation of such centres as they would have been already included in the official coverage plan for extension of DTT in the region.
I-1547, točka 22.
The JCCM provided two examples of Collaboration Agreements signed by Abertis.
Zadeva T-155/04, Selex, ZOdl.
Paragraph 22 of Abertis Telecom submission of 31 January 2011.
2006, str.
Astra refers to its internal cost study submitted together with the complaint, carried out in November 2008.
II-4797, točke 73 do 82, potrjena z zadevo C-113/07, Selex, ZOdl.
The study compares the costs of extension of coverage using both technologies — terrestrial and satellite.
2009, str.
The assumptions of the study differ from the ones carried out by Spain and Abertis in various respects, amongst others concerning the costs of satellite antenna and necessity of purchase of an external set-up box for the reception of digital terrestrial TV.
I-2307.
The study concludes that the extension of coverage via satellite would not be more expensive than using the terrestrial technology.
Kot je določeno v oddelku 2.1.3., morajo javni izdajatelji televizijskega programa pokrivati 98 % prebivalstva in morajo zato območje II pokrivati s svojimi sredstvi.
Abertis refers to its own cost study conducted in January 2010 to compare the respective costs of using DTT and satellite technology to provide digital television services in Area II.
Poleg tega se nacionalni javni televizijski kanali RTVE in regionalni javni kanali prenašajo prek drugega omrežja.
According to this study, the overall cost for using DTT technology would represent about EUR 286 million in a 10-year period, whereas the total costs of using the satellite technology in the same period would amount to approximately EUR 532 million.
Medtem ko zasebni izdajatelji televizijskega programa uporabljajo signal enofrekvenčnega omrežja (Single Frequency Network – SFN), javni izdajatelji televizijskega programa uporabljajo omrežje Red Global Española (RGE).
SA.28599 — C(2013)3204 final of 19 June 2013.
Zaradi teh razlik je za prizemne objekte potrebna drugačna oprema za obe omrežji.
Such guidance can be found in the relevant documents of the Central government.
Ker je lokalni operater, kot je Radiodifusión, razpošiljal signal nacionalnih izdajateljev televizijskega programa, bi se lahko prijavil za regionalne subvencije.
In particular, the framework agreements signed in December 2008, entitled Framework Collaboration Agreement between the Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Trade and the Autonomous Community of […] for the Development of the National Transition Plan to DTT, foresee a list of activities that will be financed by the central and regional authorities in order to reach the coverage of digital television equal to the existing analogue coverage.
Vendar ni bil organiziran noben javni razpis, na katerega bi se lahko prijavili morebitni operaterji in predložili svoje ponudbe.
On the one hand they refer to existingtransmission centres upgraded by broadcasters (DTT centres deployed in Area I) and, on the other hand, to ‘coverage extensions’ — additional centres that will need to be deployed in order to ensure the same penetration of digital television.
Ravno nasprotno, regionalni organi bi morali prevzeti pobudo in poiskati centre za razpošiljanje signala, ki so prenašali signal nacionalnih izdajateljev televizijskega programa, in jim ponuditi pomoč za digitalizacijo.
Given that only the DTT technology requiresexistence of transmission centres, it seems clear that the actions foreseen concern only the DTT technology.
V zvezi s tem je družba Radiodifusión opozorila, da tudi med ponovnim prenašanjem televizijskega signala javna uprava nikoli ni stopila v stik z njo, da bi razpravljali o morebitnem financiranju digitalizacije njenega omrežja.
Further, the addenda to the 2008 Framework Agreements signed between October and December 2009 refer to funding for the coverage extension.
Zaradi sporazumov o prenosu opreme digitalne prizemne televizije je bila v nekaterih primerih oprema, ki jo je kupila družba Telecom CLM (s sredstvi JCCM), vrnjena JCCM po dveh letih upravljanja.
They define what should beunderstood by ‘action to extend the coverage’, by making explicit reference only to the terrestrial technology.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 24, Abertis prevladuje na trgu prenosa nekodiranih televizijskih signalov na prizemni platformi na območju I in prek hčerinskega Hispasata na območju III.