natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Italy asserts that So.Ge.A.AL has drawn up several business plans relating to the overall development of the airport at various points in time between 2000 and 2010.
Komisija zato meni, da obstaja jasna povezava med sporazumi o letaliških storitvah in o tržnih storitvah, saj so slednji temeljili na sklenitvi sporazuma o letaliških storitvah in storitvah, ki so jih zagotovili prevozniki.
Those business plans include some forward looking estimates on the passenger numbers and revenues, as well as some information on costs.
O pristopu, uporabljenim za oceno dodatnih stroškov in prihodkov
However, none of those business plans is specific to a particular agreement signed between So.Ge.A.AL and the airlines operating at Alghero airport or AMS.
Družba So.Ge.A.AL pred sklenitvijo sporazumov z navedenimi letalskimi prevozniki ni izvedla nobene predhodne analize njihove donosnosti.
Furthermore, they do not cover the entire period of So.Ge.A.AL's agreements with those airlines.
Kot je bilo navedeno, je Italija Komisiji z dopisom z dne 25. marca 2014 predložila rekonstruirano predhodno analizo donosnosti sporazumov, sklenjenih z družbami Air One/Alitalia, Meridiana, Volare in Germanwings, ki je temeljila na podatkih, ki bi bili na voljo udeležencu v tržnem gospodarstvu na mestu družbe So.Ge.A.AL ob sklenitvi zadevnih sporazumov, in takrat predvidljivem razvoju.
As mentioned above, Italy prepared reconstructed ex ante profitability analyses of the agreements with Ryanair based on the incremental costs and revenues that could be reasonably expected by a MEO acting in lieu of So.Ge.A.AL at the time of the conclusion of each of these agreements during the period under investigation, i.e. 2000-2010, as summarised in Table 8.
Po mnenju Italije pristop, uporabljen pri rekonstruirani analizi, zajema metodologijo, ki bi jo sprejel udeleženec v tržnem gospodarstvu in rezultati ocene donosnosti navedenih sporazumov bi pokazali, da se je tudi za te sporazume predhodno pričakovalo, da bodo za družbo So.Ge.A.AL donosni.
Based on these analyses, So.Ge.A.AL could reasonably expect the agreements with Ryanair to be profitable for the airport at the time they were concluded.
Analiza temelji na pristopu iz uvodnih izjav od 501 do 524.
The 2000 business plan of So.Ge.A.AL has been used in the reconstructed analysis of the expected profitability of the 2000, 2002 and 2003 ASAs, whilst the 2004 and 2009 business plans have been used in the reconstructed analysis of the 2006 and 2010 ASAs.
Dodatni prihodki iz letalskih dejavnosti so se izračunali z uporabo zadevnih letaliških pristojbin, ki naj bi jih plačal posamezni letalski prevoznik, združenih z napovedmi glede prometa za zadevnega letalskega prevoznika za vse storitve razen zemeljske oskrbe.
However, it has not been possible to infer all of the incremental revenues and costs associated with each agreement with Ryanair from So.Ge.A.AL's business plans.
Prihodki od letalskih dejavnosti od zemeljske oskrbe temeljijo na pristojbinah, o katerih se je družba So.Ge.A.AL dogovorila s posameznim letalskim prevoznikom.
Table 8 sets out the NPVs of the cash flows expected from the Ryanair agreements based on the 2014 MEOP Report.
Dodatni prihodki iz neletalskih dejavnosti temeljijo na pričakovanjih družbe So.Ge.A.AL v času podpisa sporazumov iz let 2007 in 2010 z letalskimi prevozniki, ki so se nanašale na prihodke iz neletalskih dejavnosti v višini 5,00–6,00 EUR na odhajajočega potnika zaradi razvoja novega terminala (glej tudi preglednico 9).
The fact that those NPVs are all positive would confirm that it was rational for the airport manager to conclude the agreements with Ryanair.
Dodatni stroški poslovanja so se izračunali z upoštevanjem kategorij dodatnih stroškov, ki jih je družba So.Ge.A.AL pričakovala v času podpisa vsakega od sporazumov z družbami Air One/Alitalia, Volare, Meridiana in Germanwings, vključevali pa so: dodatne stroške osebja, dodatne stroške oskrbe, dodatne stroške blaga, storitev in materialov, dodatne koncesijske stroške in enkratna plačila za trženje, povezana z novimi rutami in nagradami za uspešnost.
Table 8
Regresijska analiza se je izvedla za število potnikov in stroške na ravni letališča, da bi se opredelil učinek spremembe števila potnikov na letališču Alghero na skupne stroške letališča.
NPVs of the cash flows expected from the Ryanair agreements — 2014 MEOP Report [108]
Italija je za namene analize donosnosti sporazumov z družbama Alitalia in Meridiana iz leta 2010 izvedla regresijo za podatke o stroških za obdobje pred podpisom sporazumov, tj. obdobje 1998–2009, ki bi bili družbi So.Ge.A.AL na voljo na datum, ko je sklenila zadevna sporazuma.
NPV over the duration of the agreement (million EUR) [109]
Vendar je po navedbah Italije število razpoložljivih podatkovnih točk pred podpisom sporazumov z družbama Germanwings in Volare iz leta 2007 (1998–2006) zelo majhno.
The 2000 ASA
Dobljene ocene dodatnih stroškov osebja in materialov znašajo 2,7 EUR oziroma 9,3 EUR na odhajajočega potnika, kar se šteje za nenavadno visoko.
[4–8] [110]
Dodajanje ali izbris ene same podatkovne točke ima v tem primeru velik vpliv na rezultate.
The 2002 ASA
Na tej podlagi se je z analizo donosnosti dobila negativna neto sedanja vrednost za družbo Germanwings, neto sedanja vrednost sporazuma z družbo Alitalia pa ostaja pozitivna.
[3–6]
Po navedbah Italije so ocene, dobljene z regresijo stroškov, stabilnejše z večanjem števila podatkovnih točk, zato bi moralo biti v regresiji sporazumov z družbama Germanwings in Alitalia iz leta 2007 zajeto celotno obdobje 1998–2010.
[9–12]
Pričakovani dodatni stroški oskrbe, blaga, storitev in materialov v času trajanja posameznega sporazuma temeljijo na povprečnih stroških oskrbe na premik v letalskem prometu in povprečnih stroških blaga, storitev in materialov na potnika na ravni letališča v letu pred podpisom sporazuma.
The assumptions taken into account for the purpose of the reconstructed profitability analysis are detailed in recitals 459-471.
Ti stroški na enoto so se nato povečali za pričakovano inflacijo v vsakem letu in pomnožili z zadevnimi napovedmi glede prometa za posameznega letalskega prevoznika;
Aeronautical revenues
koncesijski stroški se spreminjajo s številom potnikov.
Italy took into account different categories of aeronautical revenues, notably revenues from charges such as landing, ground handling and ticketing.
Dodatni koncesijski stroški temeljijo na povprečnih koncesijskih stroških na potnika na ravni letališča v letu pred podpisom posameznega sporazuma, pomnoženi z napovedmi glede prometa za zadevnega letalskega prevoznika in povečani za inflacijo.
For those charges not specified in the ASAs, assumptions have been based on invoice data provided by Ryanair.
Preglednica 13
Italy however explained that Ryanair's invoice data on charges is consistent with So.Ge.A.AL's published charges for all airport services, apart from handling.
Predpostavke glede koeficienta zasedenosti
A discount on handling charges, reflecting the scale of the carrier's operations at the airport, was granted to Ryanair, which was reflected in the ASAs.
Letalski prevoznik
In order to derive incremental aeronautical revenues, So.Ge.A.AL supplemented the information on Ryanair passengers and turnarounds from the ASAs, with information derived from the business plans.
Koeficient zasedenosti
The 2000, 2002 and 2003 ASAs did not stipulate any traffic projections.
Napovedi glede prometa za družbo Air One/Alitalia za čas trajanja sporazuma o oskrbi so se pridobile na naslednji način:
Therefore, traffic forecasts underpinning the analysis of the 2000, 2002 and 2003 ASAs have been derived from So.Ge.A.AL's 2000 business plan, which contained projections for Ryanair's traffic at the airport.
napovedi glede prometa, povezane z uvedbo treh mednarodnih rut v Barcelono, Bruselj in Pariz ter iz njih temeljijo na sporazumu o trženju.
Although the 2006 and 2010 ASAs did stipulate certain traffic targets for Ryanair, Italy explained that these targets did not reflect So.Ge.A.AL's expectations of the overall level of Ryanair traffic at the airport.
Družba Air One/Alitalia naj bi na vsaki ruti opravljala tri lete na teden;
Rather, So.Ge.A.AL considered the targets represented minimum contractual commitments from Ryanair.
napovedi glede prometa za notranje lete temeljijo na številu letov, ki jih je družba Air One/Alitalia opravljala leta 2009, povečanih za predpostavko, da se bo notranji promet povečal za 1 % letno.
Therefore, for the 2006 and 2010 ASAs, traffic projections have been based on the business plans drawn up by So.Ge.A.AL at the closest point in time prior to the 2006 and 2010 ASAs being signed (namely, traffic projections are based on So.Ge.A.AL's 2004 and 2009 business plans).
Pričakovani dodatni prihodki in pričakovani dodatni stroški so se izračunali s pomočjo napovedi glede prometa.
Given that So.Ge.A.AL's business plans do not cover the entire period of its contractual agreements with the airlines, in order to extend the profitability analysis over the entire life of the Ryanair agreements, forecasts of air traffic (rotations) and passenger departures have been developed for the years not covered by the business plans in two steps.
Pričakovani dodatni prihodki iz letalskih dejavnosti temeljijo na napovedih glede prometa in objavljenih letaliških pristojbinah za vse storitve razen oskrbe.
First, the number of Ryanair turnarounds was forecast by updating the number of turnarounds for the last year contained in the business plan, assuming an annual growth in turnarounds of 19 %.
Pričakovani dodatni stroški so se izračunali na podlagi predpostavk iz uvodnih izjav 503 do 508 in vključujejo enkratno plačilo za trženje, ki ga je družba So.Ge.A.AL plačala družbi Air One/Alitalia kot spodbudo za uvedbo mednarodnih rut z letališča Alghero.
Second, the number of departing passengers for the remaining period was derived from the annual seat capacity, implied by the number of turnarounds, assuming a load factor of 82 %, i.e. Ryanair's network wide average load factor at the time the agreements were signed.
Preglednica 14
Non aeronautical revenues
Neto sedanje vrednosti denarnih tokov, pričakovanih na podlagi sporazuma z družbo Air One/Alitalia izleta 2010 (v mio.
The assumptions for non-aeronautical revenues have been based on the business plans drawn up by So.Ge.A.AL at the closest point of signing each ASA, as set out in Table 9:
EUR)
Table 9
Dodatni dobiček
Assumptions on expected non-aeronautical revenue
Neto sedanja vrednost [123] (v času trajanja sporazuma)
Non-aeronautical revenue per departing passenger
Napovedi glede prometa za družbo Volare temeljijo na premikih v letalskem prometu iz sporazumov o trženju, tj. 28 letov leta 2007, 207 letov leta 2008 in 2009 ter 180 letov leta 2010.
Source
Dodatni prihodki iz letalskih dejavnosti so temeljili na objavljenih letaliških pristojbinah in sporazumu o oskrbi, skupaj z napovedmi glede prometa.
1,96–2,38
Dodatni prihodki iz neletalskih dejavnosti so se ocenili v skladu s pristopom iz uvodne izjave 502.
2000 business plan
Dodatni stroški so temeljili na povprečnih stroških na enoto in napovedih glede prometa na podlagi predpostavk iz uvodnih izjav 503 do 508 in vključujejo enkratno plačilo v višini […] EUR za prvo leto dejavnosti.
2,17–2,38
Pri izračunu neto sedanje vrednosti iz preglednice 15 je regresijska analiza temeljila na podatkih o stroških za obdobje pred podpisom sporazuma, tj. 1998–2006.
4,31–4,64
Preglednica 15
2004 business plan
Neto sedanje vrednosti denarnih tokov, pričakovanih na podlagi sporazuma z družbo Volare iz leta 2007 (vtisoč EUR)
6,02–6,47
Neto sedanja vrednost [124] (v času trajanja sporazuma)
2009 business plan
Napovedi glede prometa za družbo Meridiana, na katerih temeljijo predpostavke o pričakovanih dodatnih prihodkih in dodatnih stroških, temeljijo na številu premikov v letalskem prometu na rutah v Milano, Verono in Bari ter iz njih, kot je določeno v sporazumu o trženju iz leta 2010.
For the period of each ASA not covered by the respective business plans, the last available forecast of non-aeronautical revenues per departing passenger has been carried forward in each year until the end of the agreement.
Dodatni stroški so temeljili na povprečnih stroških na enoto in napovedih glede prometa v skladu z uvodnimi izjavami 503 do 508 in vključujejo enkratno plačilo v višini […] EUR.
For example, in the 2000 business plan, the last year for which a forecast is available is 2006.
Komisija ugotavlja, da naj bi sporazum z družbo Meridiana o trženju veljal eno leto, v obdobju od junija 2010 do oktobra 2010, v njem pa je bilo določeno, da se lahko, če bo število potnikov letalskega prevoznika preseglo določene najnižje pragove, podaljša tudi na leti 2011 in 2012.
According to the business plan, in 2006 non-aeronautical revenues per departing passenger were EUR 2,38.
Italija je pojasnila, da je družba So.Ge.A.AL v času podpisa sporazumov pričakovala, da bo družba Meridiana dosegla zahtevano najmanjše stopnjo potniškega prometa, in da bo družba Meridiana z družbo So.Ge.A.AL obnovila sporazum o trženju (in s tem sporazum o oskrbi) pod podobnimi pogoji.
For each remaining year of the 2006 ASA, the same level of non-aeronautical revenues per departing passenger has been assumed.
Na podlagi navedenih predpostavk je neto sedanja vrednost denarnih tokov, pričakovanih na podlagi sporazumov z družbo Meridiana iz leta 2010, predstavljena v preglednici 16.
Incremental costs
Kot je prikazano v preglednici 16, je Italija za namene analize donosnosti upoštevala obdobje 2010–2013.
In the absence of information about the expected incremental costs associated with serving Ryanair at the time each of the ASAs was signed, incremental costs were estimated by Italy based on the relationship between the airport's operating costs and passenger numbers.
Preglednica 16
In the first step, regression analysis was carried out to identify the impact of a change in the airport's passenger numbers on the airport's operating costs.
[150–200]
In the second step, the estimate of the additional operating costs as a result of the Ryanair agreements was derived from the results in the first step combined with forecasts of the number of Ryanair passengers.
Neto sedanja vrednost [125] (v času trajanja sporazuma)
The following components of costs were considered:
Napovedi glede prometa za družbo Germanwings temeljijo na ciljnih premikih v letalskem prometu, navedenih v sporazumu iz leta 2007 in potrjujejo pričakovanja družbe So.Ge.A.AL glede dodatnih prihodkov in stroškov v času sklenitve sporazuma.
incremental staff costs
Dodatni prihodki iz letalskih dejavnosti so temeljili na objavljenih letaliških pristojbinah in sporazumu iz leta 2007, skupaj z napovedmi glede prometa.
payments towards new route incentives, marketing, and/or success fees to Ryanair or AMS
Pri izračunu neto sedanje vrednosti iz preglednice 17 je regresijska analiza temeljila na podatkih o stroških za obdobje pred podpisom sporazuma, tj. 1998–2006.
concession costs
Preglednica 17
Staff costs: So.Ge.A.AL's business plan of 2000 includes the costs of additional staff required as a result of the agreements with Ryanair up to 2006.
Neto sedanje vrednosti denarnih tokov, pričakovanih na podlagi sporazuma z družbo Germanwings iz leta 2007 (v tisoč EUR)
Therefore, for the purposes of the assessments of the 2000, 2002 and 2003 ASAs, incremental staff costs have been obtained from So.Ge.A.AL's 2000 business plan.
Neto sedanja vrednost [126] (v času trajanja sporazuma)
The 2004 and the 2006 business plans however do not provide data on incremental costs.
Presoja
To derive estimates of staff costs that are incremental to the Ryanair agreements beyond 2006, statistical analysis was carried out based on data on the airport's aggregate staff costs, in order to determine the proportion of costs that varied with changes in passenger numbers [111].
Komisija se strinja s smiselnostjo pristopa, ki ga je Italija uporabila pri ocenjevanju števila potnikov in na navedeni podlagi izračunala dodatne prihodke iz letalskih in iz neletalskih dejavnosti.
The estimate of the additional staff costs was then derived from the regression results combined with the estimated number of Ryanair passengers.
To velja tudi za izračun dodatnih stroškov, ki vključujejo plačila za trženje.
Other costs: Similarly, regression analysis has been carried out to estimate the incremental costs of goods and materials [112], services [113], security, inventories, as these costs were not mentioned in the business plans.
Vendar Komisija meni, da bi morala regresijska analiza temeljiti na podatkih, ki bi bili na voljo družbi So.Ge.A.AL v času sklenitve sporazumov, zato bi jo bilo treba izvesti le za obdobje pred podpisom navedenih sporazumov, tj. v tem primeru obdobje 1998–2006 za sporazume z družbama Germanwings in Volare ter obdobje 1998–2009 za sporazume z družbama Alitalia in Meridiana.
New route incentives, marketing and/or success fees payable to Ryanair have been included as a cost to the airport.
V nasprotju s sporazumi z družbo Ryanair iz let 2000, 2002 in 2003, pri katerih je Komisija sprejela, da na podlagi predhodnih podatkov o stroških ni mogoče izvesti nobene smiselne regresije, zato so se za približek temu, kar bi preudaren udeleženec v tržnem gospodarstvu pričakoval v času sklenitve navedenih sporazumov (glej uvodno izjavo 491), uporabili podatki o stroških za obdobje 1998–2008, je v primeru sporazuma z družbo Germanwings iz leta 2007 in sporazuma z družbo Meridiana iz leta 2010 na voljo več podatkovnih točk za izvedbo regresije za predhodne podatke o stroških, ki bi bili družbi So.Ge.A.AL na voljo v času sklenitve zadevnih sporazumov.
Incremental concession costs [114] have been based on per-unit costs at the airport level, multiplied by the traffic forecasts for Ryanair.
Poleg tega Komisija ugotavlja tudi, da je Italija podoben pristop sprejela pri analizi sporazumov z družbo Ryanair iz leta 2006, ki so bili sklenjeni pred podpisom sporazuma iz leta 2007 z družbo Germanwings.
According to Italy, So.Ge.A.AL did not aim to recover the cost of the new passenger terminal from charges paid by Ryanair.
Poleg tega Komisija ugotavlja, da Italija ni upoštevala „končne vrednosti“, s katero bi se zajele koristi, ki naj bi se ustvarile po končanem trajanju sporazumov, sklenjenih med družbo So.Ge.A.AL in družbami Alitalia, Meridiana, Volare in Germanwings.
At the same time, a ‘terminal value’ was added as revenue to the airport to account for the benefits of the marketing service agreements and airport service agreements which in Italy's view last even after the expiry of the marketing service agreement.
Italija je pojasnila, da je družba So.Ge.A.AL v času podpisa sporazumov pričakovala, da bo družba Meridiana dosegla zahtevano najmanjše stopnjo potniškega prometa, in da bo družba Meridiana z družbo So.Ge.A.AL obnovila sporazum o trženju (in s tem sporazum o oskrbi) pod podobnimi pogoji.
The ‘terminal value’ is calculated based on the same approach followed by Ryanair and detailed in recitals 443-446.
Komisija te trditve ne more sprejeti.
Table 10 presents the NPV [115] of the cash flows which could have been expected from the Ryanair agreements based on the assumptions detailed in recitals 459 to 471.
Prvič, v sporazumu o oskrbi z družbo Meridiana ni bilo nobene izrecne določbe o njegovi morebitni obnovitvi.
NPV over the duration of the agreement (million EUR) [116]
Zato meni, da bi se moralo v analizi donosnosti upoštevati le prvotno trajanje sporazuma, tj. eno leto.
22 June 2000 — 21 June 2010
Hkrati Komisija ugotavlja, da je pristop Italije za utemeljitev pričakovanj družbe So.Ge.A.AL glede obnove sporazuma o oskrbi preprosto temeljil na možnosti podaljšanja sporazuma o trženju (namesto sporazuma o oskrbi).
[4 – 8]
Meni, da je zaradi tega pristopa trditev, ki sta jo med preiskavo podali družbi Ryanair in AMS, da se sporazume o letaliških storitvah in o tržnih storitvah zlahka loči, težko sprejeti.
1 January 2002 — 31 December 2012
Komisija je rekonstruirala analizo na podlagi premislekov iz uvodnih izjav 525 do 532.
[3 – 6]
Izračunane neto sedanje vrednosti za navedene sporazume v času njihove sklenitve v obdobju, v katerem naj bi veljali, so predstavljene v preglednici 18.
1 September 2003 — 1 September 2014 [9 – 12] 2006 ASA (3 April 2006) 1 January 2006 — 31 December 2010
Preglednica 18
[6 – 9]
Neto sedanje vrednosti sporazumov med družbo So.Ge.A.AL in družbami Air One/Alitalia, Meridiana,Volare in Germanwings
1 January 2010 — 31 December 2013
Neto sedanja vrednost v času trajanja sporazuma (v tisoč EUR)
[9 – 12]
od leta 2007 do leta 2010
The Commission takes note that for the purpose of the profitability analysis of the 2006 and 2010 ASAs, Italy considered a duration of 10 years for the 2006 ASA and nine years for the 2010 ASA, rather than the period during which the agreement was set to apply initially, namely five and four years respectively.
od leta 2010 do leta 2015
Italy did however also provide to the Commission the results of the profitability analysis when taking into account the initial duration of the 2006 and 2010 ASAs as strictly defined in those agreements.
od leta 2010 do leta 2011
In defence of its position, Italy argued that at the time of signing each of the agreements with Ryanair, So.Ge.A.AL had reasonable expectations that these would be renewed on similar terms.
Ker je pričakovani diskontirani rezultat za sporazume z družbama Meridiana in Germanwings negativen, Komisija ugotavlja, da družba So.Ge.A.AL pri sklenitvi navedenih sporazumov ni ravnala kot udeleženec v tržnem gospodarstvu.
In particular, based on the explicit provision in the 2006 ASA that the agreement could be extended for an additional five-year term until 1 January 2016, So.Ge.A.AL expected this agreement to be renewed on similar terms.
Upravljavec letališča ni mogel pričakovati, da bo pokril vsaj dodatne stroške, ki bi nastali na podlagi katere od navedenih pogodb.
Similarly, the 2010 ASA was expected to cover the period between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2013, with the potential for the ASA to be extended for an additional five-year term until 31 December 2018.
Ker družba So.Ge.A.AL ni ravnala kot udeleženec v tržnem gospodarstvu, je z odločitvijo, da sklene sporazume pod navedenimi pogoji, družbama Germanwings in Meridiana dodelila gospodarsko prednost.
The Commission cannot accept this argument.
Pregled dodatnih stroškov in prihodkov, ki bi se jih lahko pričakovalo v času sklenitve sporazumov z družbama Germanwings in Meridiana, je povzet v preglednici 19.
First, neither the 2006 nor the 2010 agreement lays down its automatic prolongation once the agreement has run its full duration.
Preglednica 19
The 2006 ASA rather lays down that So.Ge.A.AL undertakes, upon expiry of the term of the agreements, to renegotiate a suitable airport use service package with Ryanair for an additional five-year term, provided that certain conditions are met, notably the carrier meets its obligations in terms of marketing services in full and So.Ge.A.AL obtains the concession to operate the airport beyond 1 January 2011.
Dodatna donosnost sporazumov z družbama Germanwings in Meridiana
The Commission considers that based on that provision alone, in 2006 So.Ge.A.AL could not have relied on an extension, not the least on similar terms, such extension being hypothetical and depending in particular on Ryanair's willingness to accept it.
Pričakovano število potnikov
Indeed, the above-mentioned provision does not legally bind Ryanair to the conclusion of a new agreement with the airport manager, nor does it provide any certainty in respect of the observance by either party of the conditions in question, notably in view of the significant uncertainty surrounding the award of the comprehensive concession to the airport operator at that time.
Pričakovani dodatni prihodki iz letalskih dejavnosti
The Commission considers that the 2010 ASA provides even less certainty as to its potential extension.
Pričakovani dodatni prihodki iz neletalskih dejavnosti