natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Equal and non-discriminatory access to infrastructure (criterion 4)
Poleg tega je v skladu s členom 7.4 sporazuma o letaliških storitvah pristojbina za zemeljsko oskrbo prvo leto znašala 195 EUR.
The French authorities emphasise that access to the infrastructure was non-discriminatory.
Določeno je bilo tudi, da višina pristojbine od drugega leta naprej znaša 245 EUR.
The only constraint on using the infrastructure at Angoulême airport was linked to the limit imposed by the capacity of the apron and the terminal.
Komisija je ta znesek zato uporabila v svoji analizi.
The incentives had been opened to any airline launching a new route, although only Ryanair had actually benefited.
Francoski organi v tem primeru niso priglasili nadomestila, izplačanega upravljavcem letališča Angoulême, in sporazumov iz leta 2008.
The French authorities state that the mere fact that Angoulême airport is classified under category D of the 2005 Airline Guidelines is sufficient to demonstrate that competition is not affected to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Komisija meni tudi, da je dejanska prednost, ki sta jo prejeli družbi Ryanair in AMS, omejena na dejansko trajanje izvajanja sporazumov iz leta 2008.
Necessity and proportionality of the aid (criterion 6)
Družbi Ryanair in AMS po prekinitvi teh sporazumov nista prejeli nobenih plačil v obliki plačil za trženje.
The French authorities consider that the 100 % public financing of the investments was necessary to maintain the airport’s potential and development.
Študijo je izvedlo zavezništvo Alliance de conseils pour l’économie locale des services aéroportuaires.
They take the view that this requirement justified an allocation of the investment financing between SMAC and the operator by the subcontract dated 22 January 2009.
Predložena je bila 14. junija 2006.
This situation is to be distinguished from that which, from 2012, led SMAC to pay annual remuneration of EUR 179 400 for the provision of services following a call for tenders.
Ocena, ki jo je podala družba AMS, temelji na poročilu, ki ga je maja 2011 objavila družba Zénobie Conseil.
The French authorities point out that this legal framework did not provide for SMAC to carry out investments, but that it should act as project manager for the investments proposed by the service provider or decided by SMAC.
Družba AMS poudarja tudi, da spletno mesto družbe Ryanair zbere 4,5 milijarde ogledov letno, 80 % obiskovalcev spletnega mesta je neposrednih, stopnja odboja je 17-odstotna, obiskovalec se na njenem spletnem mestu v povprečju zadrži 9 minut in 36 sekund, privabi pa lahko veliko število morebitnih strank.
Operational financing
C-41/90, Höfner in Elser, Recueil 1991, str.
The French authorities state first that Angoulême CCI granted advances to the airport from 1984 to 2001.
I-1979, točka 21;
They consider that this period should remain outside the scope of the Commission’s investigation.
v zadevi C-244/94, Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurances proti Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche, Recueil 1995, str.
After this period, the other aid was paid by way of operating aid.
I-4013, točka 14;
Then, leaving aside the financing of investments, the French authorities state that the deficit covered by the regional and local authorities was limited to EUR 350 000 in the 2002 and 2003 financial years.
in v zadevi C-55/96, Job Centre, Recueil 1997, str.
They add that, with regard to the 2004-2006 financial years, the decisions by the airport board were not minuted.
I-7119, točka 21.
The general department of Angoulême CCI provided the amount needed to balance the budget as implemented.
v zadevi C-35/96, Komisija priti Italiji, Recueil 1995, str.
Lastly, the French authorities consider that the operational financing does not affect competition for the reasons cited in recitals 56 to 61 of this Decision.
I-3851, točka 36;
Accordingly, they believe that the criterion relating to an effect on competition is not fulfilled and that the public operational financing of Angoulême airport cannot constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
in v združenih zadevah od C-180/98 do C-184/98, Pavlov in drugi, Recueil 2000, str.
The French authorities also argue that, if the financing in question were aid, it should be found compatible with the internal market and exempted from notification.
I-6451, točka 75.
In this regard, they rely on the 2005 Guidelines and the 2005 SGEI Decision.
Navedeni sklad je nasledil izravnalni sklad za zračni prevoz (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklad FPTA), ki je bil prvotno namenjen financiranju zračnih povezav, ki naj bi spodbujale regionalni razvoj in prostorsko načrtovanje.
Second, they believe that SMAC did not reason as a prudent market-economy investor, for the reasons set out in recital 55 of this Decision.
Po potrditvi urada se proračun za letališče skupaj s proračuni drugih oddelkov na skupščini predloži izvoljenim članom zbornice, ki nato o njem glasujejo.
According to the French authorities, it is the absence of a response to the call for projects launched for the opening of international air routes that prompted Angoulême CCI, following a mandate approved by SMAC, to negotiate with Ryanair the opening of a route between London Stansted and Angoulême.
Če glasujejo za proračun, se začne njegovo izvajanje.
They also stress the fact that the objective of the improvement works begun in 2006 was not to satisfy a specific company but to enable airlines to be accommodated.
šestletno trajanje, (ii) pogodbena zaveza ponudnika storitve k zgornji meji prispevka sindikata SMAC za uravnoteženje računovodskih izkazov letališča, (iii) pavšalno nadomestilo za zagotovljeno storitev in (iv) določba o spodbudi za učinkovitost.
However, they point out that the absence of other airlines regularly using the airport resulted in virtually all of these investments being allocated to Ryanair.
Morebitni ponudniki so bili pozvani, naj pripravijo osnovno ponudbo (brez komercialnega prometa) in ponudbo za proaktivni scenarij (s komercialnim prometom).
With regard to the costs of commercial relations with Ryanair, the French authorities point out that the airport operator had to incur additional staff costs.
Poleg skupine SNC-Lavalin je osnovni in proaktivni scenarij predložila tudi družba APCO.
They refer to a difference between forecast and actual costs:
Za tehnično vrednost, enakovredni tisti iz ponudbe skupine SNC-Lavalin za proaktivni scenarij, ki je bil izbran, so cene iz obeh ponudb za celotno obdobje znašale:
Benchmark 2007
Sindikat SMAC je v povabilu k oddaji ponudb vključil tudi določbo o spodbudi za učinkovitost (50 %/50 %), če bi bil prispevek sindikata SMAC nižji od zgornje meje, določene v ponudbi;
Change 2008/2007
ta določba je vključena v specifikacijo.
Change 2009/2007
drugo
Change 2010/2007
upravičenec ali upravičenci morajo biti podjetja v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU;
Forecast
ukrep mora biti dodeljen iz državnih sredstev in mogoče ga je pripisati državi;
Actual
ukrep mora prejemniku ali prejemnikom dodeliti selektivno prednost, in 4. ukrep mora izkrivljati ali bi lahko izkrivljal konkurenco ter verjetno vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami.
Number of staff
glej tudi sodbo Splošnega sodišča v zadevi T-128/98, Aéroports de Paris proti Komisiji, Recueil 2000, str.
Full-time equivalent
II-3929, ki jo je Sodišče potrdilo v zadevi C-82/01P, Aéroports de Paris proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str.
Wage costs
I-9297;
Assistance and reception
in sodbo Splošnega sodišča v zadevi T-196/04, Ryanair proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
The same applies to the additional costs other than staff costs associated with Ryanair’s commercial activity:
2008, str.
including vehicle leases (thousand EUR)
II-3643, točka 88.
Services provided
To ureditev je treba razlikovati od tiste, na podlagi katere je sindikat SMAC po javnem razpisu od leta 2012 za zagotavljanje storitev letno plačeval nadomestilo v višini 179 400 EUR.
Other costs (thousand EUR)
Francoski organi poudarjajo, da sindikatu SMAC na podlagi tega pravnega okvira ni bilo treba izvajati naložb, bi pa moral voditi projekte v zvezi z naložbami, ki jih je predlagal ponudnik storitve ali za katere se je odločil sam.
The French authorities consider that some of the criteria in the 2005 Guidelines have not been complied with.
zaposleni
First of all, they state that Ryanair did not submit a business plan.
Departma Charente, skupnost aglomeracij širšega Angoulêma ter skupnost občin Braconne in Charente so do leta 2008 krili primanjkljaj iz poslovanja in plačevali obroke posojil v skladu s sporazumom iz leta 2002;
They had felt that the degressive aid resulting in the signing of the 2008 Agreements was such as to allow the airline to make a satisfactory commercial margin.
zbornica je morebitni preostali primanjkljaj krila s prispevkom iz svoje splošne službe.
Consequently, in the absence of a business plan, they emphasise that it is impossible to verify whether the aid intensity criterion is met.
Prvič, upravičenec sporazuma o tržnih storitvah je bilo letališče;
However, Angoulême CCI and SMAC, based on the information available on the creation of routes with public service obligations, did consider that this criterion was fulfilled.
cilj ni bil povečati koeficienta zasedenosti ali donosa na ruti družbe Ryanair.
The French authorities further believe that the upward annual trend of […] % in the number of passengers without an increase in rotations observed in 2008 and 2009 would likely have continued in 2010.
Vanj se je vplačal del pristojbin za civilno letalstvo.
Lastly, as set out in recitals 56 to 60 of this Decision, the French authorities are of the opinion that the measures adopted do not affect trade to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 225, se lahko naloge upravljanja, ki so povezane le z ohranjanjem delovanja letališča in dostopnostjo infrastrukture, štejejo za naloge splošnega interesa;
The new guidelines
le te naloge je mogoče opredeliti za storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena brez očitne napake.
France formulated comments on the interpretation of the new guidelines, on the form and the substance, and expressed its agreement with their application to cases concerning measures implemented before they were published.
Poleg tega sta v študiji predlagani dve metodi predhodnega ocenjevanja pozitivnih učinkov sporazumov o tržnih storitvah:
They note that the new guidelines are more flexible than the old guidelines as regards operating aid.
pristop na podlagi denarnega toka in pristop na podlagi kapitalizacije.
France maintains that their retroactive application to all aid would therefore allow previous situations for certain airports to be treated less disadvantageously.
Merila za dodelitve so vključevala naslednje:
COMMENTS BY THIRD PARTIES
„gospodarsko najugodnejša ponudba glede na merila, navedena v specifikacijah, povabilu k oddaji ponudb ali na začetek pogajanj ali v opisni dokumentaciji“.
Comments by Air France
„Pri pristopu na podlagi kapitalizacije bi bilo treba upoštevati le delež stroškov trženja, ki ga je mogoče pripisati neopredmetenemu dolgoročnemu sredstvu letališča.
Air France considers that the measures granted in favour of Ryanair and its subsidiary AMS are particularly representative of Ryanair’s commercial practices.
Vendar morda ne bo mogoče zlahka opredeliti deleža izdatkov za trženje, ki naj bi ustvaril prihodnji prihodek za letališče (tj. naložbo v osnovna neopredmetena dolgoročna sredstva letališča), v nasprotju s tistim, ki ustvarja tekoč prihodek za letališče.
Air France has also submitted comments to the Commission on the application of the new guidelines to this case.
V njej je poudarjeno tudi, da „je treba za izvajanje pristopa na podlagi kapitalizacije oceniti povprečno obdobje, v katerem lahko letališče zadrži stranke zaradi tržne akcije družbe AMS.
It challenges the application of the new guidelines to cases relating to operating aid to airports, even where the aid was paid before the guidelines were published.
Zaradi pomanjkanja ustreznih podatkov bi bilo v praksi zelo težko oceniti povprečno trajanje obdobja po tržni akciji družbe AMS, v katerem se zadržijo stranke“.
First, Air France takes the view that this is a retroactive application of the new guidelines which benefits unscrupulous operators by legitimising behaviour which did not comply with the rules applicable to the period during which the behaviour occurred.
Pristojbine za pristajanje na rotacijo
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1227
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/1227
of 23 July 2014
z dne 23. julija 2014
on State aid SA.22614 (C 53/07) implemented by France in favour of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pau-Béarn, Ryanair, Airport Marketing Services and Transavia
o državni pomoči SA.22614 (C 53/07), ki jo je Francija odobrila Gospodarski zbornici Pau-Béarn ter družbam Ryanair, Airport Marketing Services in Transavia
(notified under document C(2014) 5085)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 5085)
(Only the French text is authentic)
(Besedilo v francoskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those Articles and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter of 25 January 2007, the French authorities notified the Commission, pursuant to Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter ‘TFEU’), of a measure benefiting the company Airport Marketing Services Limited (‘AMS’) — a wholly-owned subsidiary of the airline Ryanair Limited (hereinafter ‘Ryanair’) — in the form of a marketing services agreement signed with the latter.
Francoski organi so z dopisom z dne 25. januarja 2007 Komisijo v skladu s členom 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU) obvestili o ukrepu v korist družbe Airport Marketing Services Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba AMS), ki je hčerinska družba v stoodstotni lasti družbe Ryanair Limited (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Ryanair), v obliki pogodbe o storitvah trženja, sklenjene s slednjo.
This measure was notified as State aid by the French authorities.
Francoski organi so ukrep priglasili kot državno pomoč.
As the measure had already been implemented by the French authorities, it was recorded by the Commission in the register of unlawful aid under number NN 12/07.
Ker so ti ukrep že izvedli, ga je Komisija vpisala v register nezakonitih pomoči pod številko NN 12/07.
(3) By letter of 26 February 2007, the Commission asked the French authorities to provide further information.
Francoski organi so z dopisom z dne 12. julija 2007 predložili zahtevane informacije.
As no response was received within the set time limit, a reminder was sent to the French authorities on 15 June 2007.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 28. novembra 2007 francoske organe obvestila o sklepu, da bo začela formalni postopek preiskave iz člena 108(2) PDEU.
By letter of 12 July 2007, the French authorities provided the information requested.
Francoski organi so 18. decembra 2007 in 29. januarja 2008 zaprosili za podaljšanje roka za predložitev pripomb glede sklepa o začetku postopka.
The Commission decision to open the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 15 February 2008.
Francoski organi so Komisiji svoje pripombe poslali 2. junija 2008.
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments on the measure in question.
Francoski organi so z dopisom z dne 7. julija 2008 Komisijo obvestili, da nimajo komentarja na pripombe tretjih strani.
On 18 December 2007 and 29 January 2008, the French authorities asked for an extension to the time limit set for submitting their comments on the opening decision.
Na prošnjo francoskih organov je bil 4. novembra 2008 organiziran sestanek med Komisijo in predstavniki zbornice.
The French authorities’ comments were submitted to the Commission on 2 June 2008.
Svetovalec je poročilo predložil 30. marca 2011.
The Commission received comments from the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Pau-Béarn (hereinafter ‘the CCIPB’) on 25 February 2008, from AMS, Ryanair and the Association of European Airlines (hereinafter ‘the AEA’) by letters of 14 March 2008, and from the airline Air France on 19 March 2008.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 17. marca 2011 pozvala francoske organe, naj predložijo dodatne informacije.
The Commission forwarded these comments to France by letter of 11 June 2008 and gave it the opportunity to respond to them.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 11. aprila 2011 zaprosila družbo Ryanair za dodatne informacije, ki jih je družba poslala z dopisom z dne 31. avgusta 2011.
By letter of 7 July 2008, the French authorities informed the Commission that they had no response to make to the comments by third parties.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 25. januarja 2012 Francijo uradno obvestila o svojem sklepu, da razširi formalni postopek preiskave, ki ga je začela leta 2007, na različne ukrepe, dodeljene letalskim prevoznikom, ki delujejo na letališču Pau, in upravljavcu letališča.
At the request of the French authorities, a meeting was held on 4 November 2008 between the Commission and representatives of the CCIPB.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 22. februarja 2012 pozvala francoske organe, naj predložijo dodatne informacije.
The consultant delivered his report on 30 March 2011.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 26. aprila 2012 pozvala francoske organe, naj predložijo dodatne informacije.
By letter of 13 April 2011, the French authorities asked for the time limit to be extended to 1 June 2011.
Družba Ryanair je z dopisom z dne 10. aprila 2013 Komisiji posredovala dve sporočili, ki ju je pripravila družba Oxera, in analizo, ki jo je pripravil profesor Damien P. McLoughlin.
The French authorities gave their response by letter of 30 May 2011.
Francija je v dopisu z dne 7. junija 2013 navedla, da nima komentarja v zvezi z dokumenti.
By letter of 21 November 2011, the French authorities informed the Commission that they had no response to make to these comments.
Francija ni odgovorila v predpisanem roku.
By letter of 25 January 2012, the Commission notified France of its decision to extend the formal investigation procedure opened in 2007 to various measures granted to airlines using Pau airport and to the airport operator.
Francija je z dopisom z dne 6. februarja 2014 predložila dodatne informacije.
The Commission decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 31 March 2012.
Komisija je 24. februarja, 13. marca in 19. marca 2014, tj. po sprejetju Smernic o državni pomoči letališčem in letalskim prevoznikom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: nove smernice), pozvala Francijo in zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo pripombe glede uporabe novih smernic v tem primeru.
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments on the measures in question.
Francija je pripombe predložila 19. marca 2014.
By letter of 22 February 2012, the Commission asked the French authorities to provide further information.
Poleg tega je bilo 15. aprila 2014 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavljeno obvestilo, s katerim so bile države članice in zainteresirane strani pozvane, naj predložijo svoje pripombe, tudi glede obravnavanega primera, ob upoštevanju začetka veljavnosti novih smernic.
On 28 February 2012 the French authorities asked for an extension to the time limit set for submitting their comments on the decision of 25 January 2012 and to the time limit set in the Commission’s letter of 22 February 2012.
Družba Air France, nevladna organizacija Transport & Environment in zbornica so pripombe predložile v predpisanem roku.
The Commission agreed to extend these time limits to 27 March 2012.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 28. maja 2014 te pripombe posredovala francoskim organom.
By letter of 29 March 2012, the French authorities gave their response to the Commission’s letter of 22 February 2012 and submitted their comments on the decision to extend the procedure.
Francija je z dopisom z dne 6. junija 2014 Komisijo obvestila, da nima komentarja na pripombe.
In relation to the extension of the procedure, the Commission received comments from the CCIPB on 30 April 2012, from AMS on 30 April 2012, and from Ryanair on 30 April 2012.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 27. februarja 2014 Francijo pozvala, naj predloži dodatne informacije.
By letter of 13 June 2012, France indicated that it had no response to make.
SPLOŠNE INFORMACIJE O LETALIŠČU
The French authorities gave their response by letter of 10 May 2012.
Letališče je bilo na začetku v lasti države, ki je zbornico pooblastila za njegovo upravljanje prek javne koncesije za opremo, odobrene za obdobje do 31. decembra 2015 z medministrskim odlokom z dne 12. marca 1965 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odlok iz leta 1965), ki so mu priloženi pogoji, ki določajo predvsem obveznosti države in zbornice v zvezi s tem.
By letter of 10 April 2013, Ryanair forwarded to the Commission two notes prepared by the company Oxera and an analysis prepared by Professor Damien P. McLoughlin.
Medministrski odlok in pogoji za koncesijo so bili štirikrat spremenjeni.
By letter of 3 May 2013, the Commission forwarded these documents to the French authorities for their response.
Zbornica je članica mreže gospodarskih zbornic.
By letter of 7 June 2013, France indicated that it had no response to make.
V Franciji so gospodarske zbornice organi javne uprave.
By letter of 14 November 2013, the Commission asked France to provide further information.
Gospodarska zbornica v bistvu zastopa splošne interese na področju trgovine, industrije in storitev na svojem območju.
By letter of 16 December 2013, the Commission forwarded the consultant’s report to the French authorities for their response.
Člen R.712-2 trgovinskega zakonika določa, da „regionalne in lokalne gospodarske zbornice nadzoruje prefekt regije ob pomoči regionalnega uradnika, pristojnega za javne finance“.
France did not respond within the set time limit.
Nadzorni organ je torej treba obvestiti o nekaterih pomembnih odločitvah, določenih v predpisih (na primer v zvezi s proračunom, najemom posojil, odobritvijo jamstev tretjim osebam, prenosi, pridobitvami ali povečanji finančnih deležev v civilnih ali gospodarskih družbah itd.).
The Commission agreed to extend the time limit to 23 January 2014.
Gospodarsko zbornico upravlja izvoljena skupščina predstavnikov podjetij na njenem območju.
As no response was received within this time limit, the Commission sent a reminder to France by letter of 24 January 2014 and allowed it a further period of 10 working days.
Gospodarska zbornica Pau-Béarn vodi posebne račune za letališče Pau, ki so ločeni od njenih splošnih računov.
France gave its response by letter of 6 February 2014.
Pogodba je bila 12. avgusta 2009 spremenjena.
The Commission received comments from Ryanair on 20 December 2013, 17 January 2014 and 31 January 2014.
Ko je mešani sindikat postal lastnik letališča, je nadomestil državo kot koncedent.
These additional comments were forwarded by letter to France on, respectively, 9 January 2014, 23 January 2014 and 4 February 2014.
V skladu s členom 28-VI-2o navedenega zakona z dne 13. avgusta 2004 je prevzel predhodno sklenjene pogodbe, zlasti koncesijsko pogodbo, sklenjeno z zbornico.
In its letters of 29 January 2014, 3 February 2014 and 21 May 2014, France informed the Commission that it had no response to make.
Zbornica je torej postala upravljavec letališča pred prenosom lastništva na mešani sindikat in letališče upravlja še danes.
On 24 February, 13 March and 19 March 2014, following the adoption of the Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (hereinafter ‘the new Guidelines’), the Commission called on France and the interested parties to submit their comments on the application of the new Guidelines to this case.
Na letališču se opravljajo leti s civilnimi in vojaškimi zrakoplovi.
France submitted comments on 19 March 2014.
Naslednja preglednica prikazuje skupno število potnikov na letih na letališče in z njega v obdobju 2000–2013.
Air France, the non-governmental organisation Transport & Environment and the CCIPB submitted comments within the set time limit.
Promet na letališču Pau (število potnikov) v obdobju 2000–2013