natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is in particular exemplified by the fact that without these measures the airport would not be allowed to operate flights during the night and would not be allowed to concentrate on the air cargo business in relation with the planning approval decision for the construction of the southern runway at Leipzig/Halle airport and its expansion strategy.
Ukrep M7 (dodatna območja za odstranjevanje ledu)
Hence, the Commission considers that measures M1, M2 and M10 cannot be regarded as falling within the public policy remit.
Nemčija trdi, da so dodatna območja za odstranjevanje ledu potrebna za varne in pravočasne operacije z zrakoplovom na letališču.
M3 (Taxiway and traversing bridge ‘E7’), M4 (Extension of northern runway (planning costs), M5 (Site clearance in readiness for construction of taxiway ‘Victor’), M6 (Parallel taxiway ‘Victor’), M12 Planning approval procedure for southern extension (runway and apron), M13 (Northern apron expansion), M14 (Eastern apron expansion), M15 (Infrastructure adaptation), and M16 (Additional infrastructure measures regarding the Northern hangar extension and the construction of the new aviation terminal and small aircraft shed)
Po njenem mnenju je ta območja treba razširiti zaradi čedalje večjega prometa na letališču, da se preprečijo zamude rednih letov.
In the present case the extension of the Northern runway is planned to ensure that freight aircraft with a high MTOW can take off without any payload restrictions, while the extension of the aprons should provide for better distribution of flight movements.
Poleg tega poudarja, da prihodki od storitev odstranjevanja ledu, ki jih zagotavlja letališče, ne krijejo stroškov vzpostavitve infrastrukture.
Moreover, with regard to taxiways, the Commission notes that at an airport, taxiways connect runways with ramps, hangars, terminals and other facilities.
Prvič, Komisija poudarja, da dejstvo, ali je neka dejavnost donosna ali ne, ni odločujoče pri pojmovanju gospodarske dejavnosti [50].
These connections allow the aircraft to vacate the runway, allowing another to land or depart.
Drugič, ugotavlja, da letalski prevozniki plačujejo za storitve odstranjevanja ledu.
Hence, taxiways and traversing bridges are intrinsically linked to runways for which the airport operator receives fees.
To so osnovne storitve, ki jih vsako letališče zagotavlja kot del svoje gospodarske dejavnosti.
In addition, the information given by Germany confirms that these measures are essential in view of the volume and flows of traffic.
Več takih storitev zagotavlja letališče, več letov lahko vzleta z njega, s čimer lahko letališče poveča svoje prihodke.
If the constructions were not be made, the airport would not benefit from the expected increase in traffic flows or the current volume of traffic flows would have to be decreased in order to ensure safe operation of the aircraft.
Posledično Komisija meni, da so storitve odstranjevanja ledu neločljivo povezane z gospodarskim izkoriščanjem letališča in se ne morejo ločiti od njegove dejavnosti, zato jih je treba šteti za gospodarske dejavnosti.
The Commission considers that this does not contradict the fact that a certain number of taxiways and traversing bridges can only be used safely for a limited volume of traffic.
Ukrep M8 (heliport)
In this respect, the Commission recalls that runways, taxiways and aprons are essential elements for the economic activities in which an airport manager is engaged.
Ukrep zajema gradnjo parkirnega prostora za helikopterje, ki se bo uporabljalo kot izhodiščno mesto samo za storitve reševanja v zraku.
The construction of runways, taxiways and aprons thus allows an airport manager to exercise its primary economic activity and cannot be disassociated from this economic activity.
Komisija meni, da gradnja heliporta olajša reševanje v zraku.
The Commission observes that measures M3, M4, M5, M6, M12, M13, M14, M15 and M16 are taken on a commercial basis by the airport manager.
Zato se lahko šteje, da je zagotovitev heliporta za storitve reševanja pristojnost javne politike.
They are therefore commercially exploitable infrastructure, and cannot be considered to fall within the public policy remit.
Povračilo mora biti strogo povezano s stroški za te storitve.
M11 Land side development of south eastern zone phase I
Ukrep M9 (dodatni infrastrukturni ukrepi)
The Commission observes that measure M11 involves the equipment of existing buildings with electricity and water supply, waste water installations and rainwater drainage, as well as additional noise abatement measures.
Dodatni infrastrukturni ukrepi zajemajo ponovno gradnjo kontrolne točke I, gradnjo funkcionalnega varnostnega objekta, da se izpolnijo potrebe zvezne in regionalne policije, carinske službe, prostora za živali in zunanje ograje (vključno s sistemom digitalnega video nadzora in detektorji gibanja).
In the light of the assessment carried out in recitals 215 and 220, these measures do not concern activities that normally fall under State responsibility in the exercise of its official powers as a public authority.
Po mnenju Nemčije so ti ukrepi potrebni za zaščito civilnega letalstva pred nezakonitim vmešavanjem, zato spadajo na področje uporabe člena 8 zakona o varnosti letalstva LuftSiG.
Rather they contribute to the upgrading of infrastructure which is used for commercial purposes, and thus, involve an economic activity, and therefore they cannot be considered to fall within the public policy remit.
Če javno financiranje, odobreno družbi FHL, slednjo razbremeni za stroške, ki bi jih morala kriti v skladu s členom 8(3) zakona o varnosti letalstva LuftSiG, se šteje, da ta tako javno financiranje spada na področje uporabe pravil Unije o državni pomoči.
M5 (new fire station building) and M9 (firefighting equipment)
Glede stroškov, povezanih z uporabo funkcionalnega varnostnega objekta s strani Nemške meteorološke službe, Komisija ugotavlja, da člen 27(f) akta o zračnem prometu LuftVG določa, da stroške iz člena 27(c) navedenega akta za nekatera letališča krije država.
With regard to the fire station building and firefighting equipment, as stated in recital 218, this activity can in general be considered to fall within the public policy remit.
Letališča so po členu 27(f) akta o zračnem prometu LuftVG upravičena do kritja stroškov kot „priznana letališča“, če Zvezno ministrstvo za promet prizna potrebo po tem, ki izhaja iz varnostnih razlogov in interesov, povezanih s prometno politiko.
As regards the legal framework, Germany submitted that for the fire station building and the firefighting equipment there are no legal rules strictly imposing these costs on the airport operator.
V skladu s členom 27(f) akta o zračnem prometu LuftVG nemška letališča, ki niso bila priznana, niso upravičena do kritja stroškov in morajo zato načeloma sama kriti stroške, povezane z ukrepi iz člena 27(c) navedenega akta.
Furthermore, the Commission observes that the remuneration of costs for the new fire station building and firefighting equipment falls within the legal competence of the Länder and that these costs are remunerated usually by the relevant regional authorities, as submitted by Germany.
Ker morajo nekatera letališča te stroške kriti sama, druga pa ne, se slednjim lahko daje prednost, čeprav se Nemška meteorološka služba lahko šteje za negospodarsko dejavnost.
Hence, the construction costs relating to the new fire station building and the costs for the purchase of firefighting equipment can be considered to fall within the public policy remit.
Letališče Leipzig/Halle je priznano kot eno takih letališč in je zato v skladu s členom 27(f) akta o zračnem prometu LuftVG upravičeno do kritja stroškov.
M5 (multi-purpose hangar) and M9.3 (winter service equipment)
Zato se v skladu s členom 27(f) akta o zračnem prometu LuftVG letališču Leipzig/Halle s kritjem stroškov, povezanih z meteorološkimi storitvami, daje prednost.
With regard to the multi-purpose hangar, Germany asserted that it falls within the public policy remit, because in case of emergency it would be used as an emergency shelter.
Sklepne ugotovitve
According to Germany, the costs for building this hangar fall also within the public policy remit, because it is currently used to store winter service equipment necessary for the safe operation of the airport during the winter time.
Z vidika ugotovitev iz oddelka 6.1.1 je letališče FLH podjetje v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe.
As regards the construction of the multi-purpose hangar at Leipzig/Halle airport, the Commission observes that this building can be used for different purposes.
Glede na ugotovitve iz oddelka 6.1.2 se ne more šteti, da financiranje naslednjih ukrepov spada v pristojnost javne politike: M1 (nakup zemljišč, preselitev, zmanjšanje hrupa in načrtovanje ohranjanja okoliške krajine); M2 (objekt za preskušanje motorjev); M3 (vozna pot in kotalni most „E7“); M4 (podaljšanje severne vzletno-pristajalne steze (stroški načrtovanja)); M5 (pravočasno čiščenje območja za gradnjo vozne steze „Victor“), M5 (večnamenski hangar), M6 (vzporedna vozna steza „Victor“), M7 (dodatna območja za odstranjevanje ledu), M9.3 (zimska delovna oprema), M10 (dodatno zmanjšanje hrupa), M11 (razvoj javnega dela letališča na jugovzhodnem območju, faza I); M12 (postopek za odobritev načrtovanja južne širitve (vzletno-pristajalne steze in letališka ploščadi)); M13 (širitev severne letališče ploščadi); M14 (širitev vzhodne letališke ploščadi); M15 (infrastrukturna prilagoditev): in M16 (dodatni infrastrukturni ukrepi, kot so širitev severnega hangarja, gradnja novega letalskega terminala in hale za mala letala).
Furthermore, as already stated in recital 215, the costs of winter service equipment (M9.3) necessary for the safe operation of the airport are normal costs of running a business and cannot be considered to fall within the public policy remit.
Financiranje teh dejavnosti upravljavcem letališča omogoča izvajanje svoje glavne gospodarske dejavnosti in se ne more ločiti od te dejavnosti.
Consequently, the Commission considers that the construction costs of the multi-purpose hangar also do not fall within the scope of the public policy remit.
Kar zadeva ukrep M5 v zvezi z novo gasilsko postajo, ukrep M9 o protipožarni opremi in ukrep M8 v zvezi s heliportom, se po mnenju Komisije lahko šteje, da spadajo v pristojnost javne politike (glej oddelek 6.1.2).
Nevertheless, this finding does not preclude Germany from entrusting the airport in emergency situations with specific tasks falling within Services of General Economy Interest.
Kar zadeva ukrep M9 glede dodatnih infrastrukturnih ukrepov, kot so ponovna gradnja kontrolne točke I, gradnja funkcionalnega varnostnega objekta, da se izpolnijo potrebe zvezne in regionalne policije, carinske službe, prostora za živali in zunanje ograje (vključno s sistemom digitalnega videonadzora in detektorji gibanja), se po mnenju Komisije lahko šteje, da te dejavnosti spadajo v pristojnost javne politike.
M7 Additional de-icing areas
Vendar če za te ukrepe uporablja člen 8(3) nemškega zakona o varnosti letalstva LuftSiG, se v skladu s to določbo nemškega zakona lahko povrnejo samo stroški, povezani z zagotavljanjem in vzdrževanjem prostorov, potrebnih za izvajanje navedenih dejavnosti iz člena 5 navedenega zakona.
Germany argues that additional de-icing areas are necessary for the safe and timely operation of aircraft at the airport.
Kar zadeva stroške, povezane z uporabo funkcionalnega varnostnega objekta s strani Nemške meteorološke službe (na katero se nanaša ukrep M9), Komisija iz razlogov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 243, meni, da se s kritjem stroškov letališča Leipzig/Halle, povezanih z meteorološkimi storitvami iz člena 27(f) akta o zračnem prometu LuftVG, letališču Leipzig/Halle daje prednost, četudi se meteorološke storitve lahko štejejo za negospodarsko dejavnost.
According to Germany, the extension of the existing de-icing areas is necessary due to the increasing traffic at the airport in order to avoid delays of the scheduled flights.
NARAVA POMOČI POSOJIL DELNIČARJEV V KORIST DRUŽBE FLH
In addition, Germany emphasises that revenues from the de-icing services provided by the airport do not cover the costs of the establishment of the infrastructure.
Odnos med posojili delničarjev in kapitalskimi injekcijami
First of all, the Commission notes that the fact whether an activity is profitable or not is not decisive for the notion of economic activity [50].
Preden se oceni, ali posojila delničarjev v korist družbe FLH pomenijo državno pomoč, je treba določiti, ali se lahko posojila delničarjev in kapitalske injekcije štejejo za dva ločena ukrepa ali za skupni ukrep.
Second, the Commission notes that the de-icing services are rendered against remuneration to air carriers.
Dokazi kažejo, da se je o obeh operacijah odločalo sočasno v okviru širšega načrta o financiranju infrastrukturnih izboljšav na letališču in da so delničarji družbe FLH nameravali svoja posojila pretvoriti v lastniški kapital.
They are essential services that any airport provides as part of its economic activity.
Vendar je Nemčija izjavila, da kapitalske injekcije niso bile odobrene nepreklicno in da družba FLH ni neposredno upravičena do povečanja kapitala.
The more of those services are provided the more flights can depart from the airport, and thereby the airport can increase its revenues.
V teh okoliščinah Komisija meni, da se posojila delničarjev in kapitalske injekcije lahko štejejo za ločena ukrepa.
Consequently, the Commission considers that de-icing services are intrinsically linked with the economic exploitation of an airport, and cannot be disassociated from this activity, and hence must be considered as economic activities.
Gospodarska prednost
M8 Heliport
Da bi Komisija preverila, ali je podjetje imelo koristi od gospodarske prednosti zaradi odobritve posojila po ugodnih pogojih, uporablja merilo „načelo posojilodajalca v tržnem gospodarstvu“.
The measure covers the establishment of a helicopter parking space which will be used as a base for air rescue services only.
Po tem načelu se dolžniški kapital, ki ga družba prejme od države neposredno ali posredno in v okoliščinah, ki so enake običajnim tržnim pogojem, ne bi smel uvrščati v državno pomoč [51].
The Commission considers that the creation of a heliport facilitates air rescue.
V tem primeru mora Komisija oceniti, ali ima družba FLH zaradi pogojev posojil delničarjev (glej preglednico 3) gospodarsko prednost, ki je upravičeno podjetje ne bi imelo pod normalnimi tržnimi pogoji.
Therefore, the provision of a heliport for rescue services can be considered to fall within the public policy remit.
Nemčija meni, da je bilo „načelo posojilodajalca v tržnem gospodarstvu“ spoštovano v celoti, ker so bila posojila delničarjev odobrena po tržnih pogojih.
The compensation must be strictly linked to the costs of these services.
Da bi Nemčija upravičila pogoje zadevnih posojil, primerja pogoje posojil delničarjev s pogoji drugih bank (glej trditve v oddelkih 3.3.1 in 3.3.2).
M9 Additional infrastructure measures
Da bi Komisija določila, ali je bilo financiranje, ki se ocenjuje, odobreno po ugodnih pogojih, lahko v skladu s svojo prakso odločanja primerja obrestno mero zadevnega posojila z referenčno obrestno mero Komisije, če niso na voljo drugi približki.
The additional infrastructure measures include the rebuilding of checkpoint I, the construction of a functional security building to meet the needs of the federal and regional police, customs, animal farm and the airport perimeter fence (including digital video surveillance system and movement detectors).
Referenčna obrestna mera Komisije se določi v skladu z metodo iz sporočila o referenčnih obrestnih merah iz leta 2008.
According to Germany these measures are necessary to safeguard civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference and fall therefore within the scope of §8 LuftSiG.
Sporočilo o referenčnih obrestnih merah iz leta 2008 določa metodo za določanje referenčnih obrestnih mer in diskontnih stopenj, ki se uporabljajo kot približek za tržno obrestno mero.
Hence, to the extent that public financing granted to FLH thus relieves this undertaking of costs it had to bear pursuant to §8(3) LuftSiG, that public financing is not exempted from scrutiny under Union State aid rules.
Vendar ker je referenčna obrestna mera Komisije približek, lahko Komisija, kadar ima na voljo druge kazalnike v primeru posamezne obrestne mere, ki bi jo posojilojemalec lahko dobil na trgu, pri ocenjevanju upošteva te kazalnike.
With regard to the costs related to the use of the functional security building by German Meteorological Service, the Commission notes that §27(f) LuftVG regulates that the costs related to §27(c) LuftVG are covered by the State for a number of specific airports.
Bonitetna ocena družbe FLH
Airports are eligible for cost coverage as ‘recognised airports’ pursuant to §27(f) LuftVG if the Federal Ministry for Transport has recognised a necessity due to safety reasons and transport policy related interests.
Da bi Komisija lahko ocenila pogoje posojil delničarjev, mora najprej oceniti kreditno sposobnost družbe FLH.
German airports which have not been recognised are not eligible for cost coverage pursuant to §27(f) LuftVG and have therefore, in principle, to bear the costs related to the measures foreseen in §27(c) LuftVG themselves.
Družbe FLH ni ocenila nobena bonitetna agencija.
Since some airports have to bear these costs themselves whereas other airports do not, the latter might be granted an advantage, even if the German Meteorological Service can be considered to be non-economic.
Vendar Nemčija trdi, da bi se zaradi pogodb o prenosu dobička ali izgube, sklenjenih med družbama FLH in MFAG, morala upoštevati bonitetna ocena matičnih družb.
Leipzig/Halle airport has been recognised to be such an airport and is hence eligible for cost coverage pursuant to §27(f) LuftVG.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je družba MFAG po nemškem zakonu odgovorna za vsako posojilo, ki ga pridobi družba FLH v času obstoja pogodbe o prenosu dobička in izgub, četudi se ta pogodba pozneje prekliče.
Therefore, covering the costs of Leipzig/Halle airport related to meteorological services pursuant to §27(f) LuftVG gives an advantage to Leipzig/Halle airport..
Zato Komisija meni, da bi se moralo šteti, da je bonitetna ocena družbe FLH vsaj taka kot bonitetna ocena njene matične družbe MFAG.
Conclusion
Poleg tega družbe MFAG niso ocenile bonitetne agencije.
In the light of the finding in section 6.1.1, FLH is an undertaking within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Kljub temu je Nemčija zagotovila nekaj internih bonitetnih ocen družbe MFAG s strani bank, ki so povzete v preglednici 4.
With regard to the finding in section 6.1.2, the financing of the following measures cannot be considered as falling within the public policy remit: M1 acquisition of land, relocation, noise abatement and accompanying landscape conservation planning, M2 engine testing structure, M3 taxiway and traversing bridge ‘E7’, M4 extension of northern runway (planning costs), M5 site clearance in readiness for construction of taxiway ‘Victor’, M5 multi-purpose hangar, M6 parallel taxiway ‘Victor’, M7 additional de-icing areas, M9.3 winter service equipment, M10 additional noise abatement, M11 land side development of south eastern zone phase I, M12 planning approval procedure for southern extension (runway and apron), M13 northern apron expansion, M14 eastern apron expansion, M15 infrastructure adaptation, and M16 additional infrastructure measures regarding the northern hangar extension and the construction of the new aviation terminal and small aircraft shed.
V skladu z uvodnimi izjavami 257–261 Komisija meni, da ima letališče FLH vsaj najnižjo bonitetno oceno družbe MFAG, tj. […] na bonitetni lestvici agencije Standard & Poor’s iz leta 2006 in […] na bonitetni lestvici iste agencije v letih 2007–2012.
The financing of these activities allows an airport manager to exercise its primary economic activity and cannot be dissociated from this activity.
Izguba ob neplačilu (ali stopnja zavarovanja s premoženjem):
With regard to M5 new fire station building, M9 firefighting equipment and M8 heliport, the Commission considers that these measures can be regarded as falling within the public policy remit (see section 6.1.2).
Če se za zadevna posojila delničarjev lahko šteje, da so dobro zavarovana s premoženjem, bi tržna praksa v takem primeru zahtevala povišanje bonitetne ocene zadevnega dolžniškega instrumenta („bonitetne ocene instrumenta“) za eno stopnjo v primerjavi z bonitetno oceno izdajatelja [52].
With regard to M9 additional infrastructure measures regarding the rebuilding of checkpoint I, the construction of a functional security building to meet the needs of the federal and regional police, customs, animal farm and the airport perimeter fence (including digital video surveillance system and movement detectors), the Commission considers that these activities may fall within the public policy remit.
Zato mora Komisija določiti izgubo ob neplačilu [53] (LGD) zadevnih posojil delničarjev.
However, to the extent that these measures fall within §8(3) LuftSiG, according to this provision of the German law only the costs related to the provision and maintenance of spaces and premises necessary for the performance of the listed activities pursuant to §5 LuftSiG may be reimbursed.
Ker so bila posojila načrtovana samo kot kratkoročna premostitvena posojila, se niso zavarovala s premoženjem.
With regard to the costs related to the use of the functional security building by German Meteorological Service (related to M9), the Commission considers for the reasons in recital 243 that covering the costs of Leipzig/Halle airport related to meteorological services pursuant to §27(f) LuftVG gives an advantage to Leipzig/Halle airport, even if meteorological services can be considered to be non-economic.
Kljub temu je Nemčija trdila, da bi morala biti izguba ob neplačilu vsaj nižja od 30 %, ker vrednost sredstev družbe FLH ([…] milijonov EUR leta 2010), ki niso zastavljena, presega vrednost njegovih obveznosti ([…] milijonov EUR leta 2010).
AID NATURE OF THE SHAREHOLDER LOANS IN FAVOUR OF FLH
V zvezi s tem Komisija ugotavlja, da knjigovodska vrednost sredstev ne zadošča, da se oceni likvidacijska vrednost v primeru insolventnosti ali stečaja letališča.
Relation between the shareholder loans and the capital injections
V članku, ki ga je junija 2006 objavil Baselski odbor za bančni nadzor, se priporoča, da se za nadrejene terjatve podjetniških obveznic, ki niso zavarovane s priznanim zavarovanjem s premoženjem, upošteva 45-odstotna izguba ob neplačilu [54].
Before assessing whether the shareholder loans in favour of FLH constitute State aid, it is necessary to determine whether the shareholder loans and the capital injections should be considered as separate measures or as a single measure.
Zato je v skladu s sporočilom o referenčnih obrestnih merah iz leta 2008 stopnja zavarovanja s premoženjem zadevnih posojil delničarjev „običajna“, izguba ob neplačilu pa v srednji kategoriji (30 % < LGD < 60 %).
The evidence shows that both operations were decided at the same time, as part of a wider plan to finance the improvements of the infrastructure of the airport, and that the shareholders of FLH had the intention to convert their loans into equity.
Komisija tako ugotavlja, da stopnja zavarovanja s premoženjem ne zadošča za povišanje bonitetne ocene podjetja za eno stopnjo.
However, Germany has declared that the capital injections have not been irrevocably granted and that FLH has no direct entitlement to the capital increase.
Primerjalna analiza pogojev posojil delničarjev družbe FLH s tržnimi približki, ki temeljijo na razmikih zamenjave kreditnega tveganja:
Under these circumstances, the Commission considers that the shareholder loans and the capital injections can be considered as separate measures.
Da bi Komisija lahko ocenila, ali so bila posojila delničarjev družbe FLH v skladu s tržnimi pogoji, je izvedla primerjalno analizo s tržnimi približki, ki temeljijo na razmikih zamenjave kreditnega tveganja.