natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
cardiac assist device (applies to group 1 only);
pripomoček za podporo delovanja srca (velja samo za skupino 1);
valvular heart surgery (applies to group 1 and 2);
operacija zaklopke (velja za skupini 1 in 2);
malignant hypertension (elevation in systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg associated with impending or progressive organ damage) (applies to group 1 and 2);
maligna hipertenzija (porast sistoličnega krvnega tlaka ≥ 180 mm Hg ali diastoličnega krvnega tlaka ≥ 110 mm Hg, povezan z neizogibno ali progresivno okvaro organov) (velja za skupini 1 in 2);
grade III blood pressure (diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg and/or systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg) (applies to group 2 only);
krvi tlak razreda III (diastolični krvni tlak ≥ 110 mm Hg in/ali sistolični krvni tlak ≥ 180 mm Hg) (velja samo za skupino 2);
congenital heart disease (applies to group 1 and 2);
prirojena bolezen srca (velja za skupini 1 in 2);
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy if without syncope (applies to group 1 only);
hipertrofična kardiomiopatija, če je brez sinkope (velja samo za skupino 1);
long QT syndrome with syncope, Torsade des Pointes or QTc > 500 ms (applies to group 1 only).
sindrom dolgega intervala QT s sinkopo, torsade des pointes ali QTc > 500 ms (velja samo za skupino 1).
For the following cardiovascular conditions, driving licences shall not be issued or renewed for applicants or drivers in the indicated groups:
Pri naslednjih kardiovaskularnih stanjih se vozniškega dovoljenja ne sme izdati ali podaljšati kandidatom ali voznikom iz naslednjih skupin:
implant of a defibrillator (applies to group 2 only);
vsaditev defibrilatorja (velja samo za skupino 2);
peripheral vascular disease — thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm when maximum aortic diameter is such that it predisposes to a significant risk of sudden rupture and hence a sudden disabling event (applies to group 1 and 2);
periferna žilna bolezen – anevrizma prsne in trebušne aorte, kadar je največji premer aorte takšen, da pomeni znatno tveganje za nenadno rupturo in posledično za nenaden dogodek, zaradi katerega posameznik ni sposoben za vožnjo (velja za skupini 1 in 2);
NYHA IV (applies to group 1 only),
NYHA IV (velja samo za skupino 1),
NYHA III and IV (applies to group 2 only);
NYHA III in IV (velja samo za skupino 2),
cardiac assist devices (applies to group 2 only);
pripomočki za podporo delovanja srca (velja samo za skupino 2);
valvular heart disease with aortic regurgitation, aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation or mitral stenosis if functional ability is estimated to be NYHA IV or if there have been syncopal episodes (applies to group 1 only);
bolezen srčne zaklopke z aortno regurgitacijo, aortno stenozo, mitralno regurgitacijo ali mitralno stenozo, če je funkcionalna sposobnost ocenjena na NYHA IV ali v primeru sinkopalnih epizod (velja samo za skupino 1);
valvular heart disease in NYHA III or IV or with ejection fraction (EF) below 35 %, mitral stenosis and severe pulmonary hypertension or with severe echocardiographic aortic stenosis or aortic stenosis causing syncope; except for completely asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis if the exercise tolerance test requirements are fulfilled (applies to group 2 only);
bolezen srčne zaklopke pri NYHA III ali IV ali z iztisno frakcijo (EF) pod 35 %, mitralno stenozo ali hudo pulmonarno hipertenzijo ali s hudo ultrazvočno opredeljeno aortno stenozo ali aortno stenozo, ki povzroča sinkopo; razen pri popolnoma asimptomatski aortni stenozi, če so izpolnjene zahteve iz obremenitvenega testiranja (velja samo za skupino 2);
structural and electrical cardiomyopathies — hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with history of syncope or when two or more of the following conditions present: left ventricle (LV) wall thickness > 3 cm, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, a family history of sudden death (in a first degree relative), no increase of blood pressure with exercise (applies to group 2 only);
strukturalne in električne kardiomiopatije – hipertrofična kardiomiopatija z anamnezo sinkope ali kadar sta prisotni dve ali več od naslednjih stanj: debelina stene levega prekata (LV) > 3 cm, netrajna ventrikularna tahikardija, družinska anamneza nenadne smrti (pri sorodniku v prvem kolenu), brez porasta krvnega tlaka pri obremenitvi (velja samo za skupino 2);
long QT syndrome with syncope, Torsade des Pointes and QTc > 500 ms (applies to group 2 only);
sindrom dolgega intervala QT s sinkopo, torsade des pointes in QTc > 500 ms (velja samo za skupino 2);
Brugada syndrome with syncope or aborted sudden cardiac death (applies to group 1 and 2).
Brugadov sindrom s sinkopo ali preprečeno nenadno srčno smrtjo (velja za skupini 1 in 2).
Driving licences may be issued or renewed in exceptional cases, provided that it is duly justified by competent medical opinion and subject to regular medical assessment ensuring that the person is still capable of driving the vehicle safely taking into account the effects of the medical condition.
Vozniška dovoljenja se lahko izdajo ali podaljšajo v izjemnih primerih, če je pristojni zdravstveni organ to ustrezno utemeljil v mnenju in če je stanje pod rednim zdravstvenim nadzorom, ki zagotavlja, da je posameznik kljub učinkom zdravstvenega stanja še vedno zmožen varne vožnje vozila.
Other cardiomyopathies
Druge kardiomiopatije
The risk of sudden incapacitating events shall be evaluated in applicants or drivers with well described cardiomyopathies (e.g. arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, non-compaction cardiomyopathy, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and short QT syndrome) or with new cardiomyopathies that may be discovered.
Tveganje za nenadne dogodke, zaradi katerih posameznik ni sposoben za vožnjo, se oceni pri kandidatih ali voznikih z dobro opisanimi kardiomiopatijami (npr. aritmogeno kardiomiopatijo desnega prekata, spongiformno kardiomiopatijo, kateholaminergično polimorfno ventrikularno tahikardijo ali sindromom kratkega intervala QT) ali z novimi kardiomiopatijami, ki se odkrijejo.
A careful specialist evaluation is required.
Potrebna je temeljita specialistična ocena.
The prognostic features of the particular cardiomyopathy shall be considered.
Upoštevati je treba prognostične dejavnike posamezne kardiomiopatije.
Member States may restrict the issue or renewal of driving licences for applicants or drivers with other cardiovascular diseases.’;
Države članice lahko omejijo izdajo ali podaljšanje vozniškega dovoljenja kandidatom ali voznikom z drugimi kardiovaskularnimi boleznimi.“;
point 10.2 of section 10 (‘DIABETES MELLITUS’) is replaced by the following:
točka 10.2 oddelka 10 („SLADKORNA BOLEZEN“) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
An applicant or driver with diabetes treated with medication which carries a risk of inducing hypoglycaemia shall demonstrate an understanding of the risk of hypoglycaemia and adequate control of the condition.
Kandidat ali voznik s sladkorno boleznijo, ki se zdravi z zdravilom, ki lahko povzroči hipoglikemijo, mora dokazati, da razume tveganje hipoglikemije in zna primerno nadzorovati bolezen.
Driving licences shall not be issued to, or renewed for, applicants or drivers who have inadequate awareness of hypoglycaemia.
Vozniških dovoljenj se ne sme izdati ali podaljšati kandidatom ali voznikom, ki ne razumejo natančno hipoglikemije.
Driving licences shall not be issued to, or renewed for, applicants or drivers who have recurrent severe hypoglycaemia, unless supported by competent medical opinion and regular medical assessment.
Vozniških dovoljenj se ne sme izdati ali podaljšati kandidatom ali voznikom, ki imajo ponavljajočo se hudo hipoglikemijo, razen če to ni utemeljeno z mnenjem pristojnega zdravstvenega organa in je pod rednim zdravniškim nadzorom.
For recurrent severe hypoglycaemias during waking hours a licence shall not be issued or renewed until 3 months after the most recent episode.
Pri ponavljajoči se hudi hipoglikemiji med budnostjo se dovoljenje ne sme izdati ali podaljšati prej kot 3 mesece po zadnji epizodi.
Driving licences may be issued or renewed in exceptional cases, provided that it is duly justified by competent medical opinion and subject to regular medical assessment, ensuring that the person is still capable of driving the vehicle safely taking into account the effects of the medical condition.’
Vozniška dovoljenja se lahko izdajo ali podaljšajo v izjemnih primerih, če je pristojni zdravstveni organ to ustrezno utemeljil v mnenju in če je stanje pod rednim zdravstvenim nadzorom, ki zagotavlja, da je posameznik kljub učinkom zdravstvenega stanja še vedno zmožen varne vožnje vozila.“
Directive (EU) 2016/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva (EU) 2016/1148 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
of 6 July 2016
z dne 6. julija 2016
concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union
o ukrepih za visoko skupno raven varnosti omrežij in informacijskih sistemov v Uniji
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 114 Pogodbe,
Network and information systems and services play a vital role in society.
Omrežja in informacijski sistemi ter storitve imajo ključno vlogo v družbi.
Their reliability and security are essential to economic and societal activities, and in particular to the functioning of the internal market.
Njihova zanesljivost in varnost sta bistveni za gospodarske in družbene dejavnosti ter zlasti za delovanje notranjega trga.
The magnitude, frequency and impact of security incidents are increasing, and represent a major threat to the functioning of network and information systems.
Obseg, pogostost in posledice varnostnih incidentov so vse večji ter pomenijo veliko grožnjo delovanju omrežij in informacijskih sistemov.
Those systems may also become a target for deliberate harmful actions intended to damage or interrupt the operation of the systems.
Ti sistemi lahko postanejo tudi tarča namernih škodljivih dejanj, katerih namen je povzročitev škode ali prekinitev delovanja sistemov.
Such incidents can impede the pursuit of economic activities, generate substantial financial losses, undermine user confidence and cause major damage to the economy of the Union.
Takšni incidenti lahko ovirajo gospodarske dejavnosti, ustvarjajo znatne finančne izgube, slabijo zaupanje uporabnikov in povzročajo veliko škodo gospodarstvu Unije.
Network and information systems, and primarily the internet, play an essential role in facilitating the cross-border movement of goods, services and people.
Omrežja in informacijski sistemi, zlasti internet, imajo bistveno vlogo pri zagotavljanju lažjega čezmejnega pretoka blaga, storitev in ljudi.
Owing to that transnational nature, substantial disruptions of those systems, whether intentional or unintentional and regardless of where they occur, can affect individual Member States and the Union as a whole.
Zaradi te transnacionalne razsežnosti lahko namerne ali nenamerne znatne prekinitve delovanja teh sistemov, ne glede na to, kje se zgodijo, vplivajo na posamezne države članice in Unijo kot celoto.
The security of network and information systems is therefore essential for the smooth functioning of the internal market.
Varnost omrežij in informacijskih sistemov je zato bistvena za nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga.
Building upon the significant progress within the European Forum of Member States in fostering discussions and exchanges on good policy practices, including the development of principles for European cyber-crisis cooperation, a Cooperation Group, composed of representatives of Member States, the Commission, and the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (‘ENISA’), should be established to support and facilitate strategic cooperation between the Member States regarding the security of network and information systems.
Na podlagi vidnega napredka, ki ga je Evropski forum držav članic dosegel pri razpravah in izmenjavi dobrih političnih praks, vključno z oblikovanjem načel za evropsko sodelovanje pri kibernetskih krizah, bi bilo treba ustanoviti skupino za sodelovanje, sestavljeno iz predstavnikov držav članic, Komisije in Agencije Evropske unije za varnost omrežij in informacij (v nadaljnjem besedilu: agencija ENISA), da se podpre in zagotovi lažje strateško sodelovanje med državami članicami na področju varnosti omrežij in informacijskih sistemov.
For that group to be effective and inclusive, it is essential that all Member States have minimum capabilities and a strategy ensuring a high level of security of network and information systems in their territory.
Za učinkovito in vključujoče delovanje te skupine morajo imeti vse države članice minimalne zmogljivosti in strategijo za zagotavljanje visoke ravni varnosti omrežij in informacijskih sistemov na svojem ozemlju.
In addition, security and notification requirements should apply to operators of essential services and to digital service providers to promote a culture of risk management and ensure that the most serious incidents are reported.
Poleg tega bi morale za izvajalce bistvenih storitev in ponudnike digitalnih storitev veljati varnostne zahteve in zahteve za priglasitev, da bi se spodbudila kultura obvladovanja tveganja in zagotovilo poročanje o najresnejših incidentih.
The existing capabilities are not sufficient to ensure a high level of security of network and information systems within the Union.
Obstoječe zmogljivosti ne zadostujejo za zagotavljanje visoke ravni varnosti omrežij in informacijskih sistemov v Uniji.
Member States have very different levels of preparedness, which has led to fragmented approaches across the Union.
Raven pripravljenosti držav članic je zelo različna, zato se tudi pristopi po Uniji med seboj močno razlikujejo.
This results in an unequal level of protection of consumers and businesses, and undermines the overall level of security of network and information systems within the Union.
Zaradi tega je raven varstva potrošnikov in podjetij različna, prizadeta pa je tudi celotna raven varnosti omrežij in informacijskih sistemov v Uniji.
Lack of common requirements on operators of essential services and digital service providers in turn makes it impossible to set up a global and effective mechanism for cooperation at Union level.
Pomanjkanje skupnih zahtev za izvajalce bistvenih storitev in ponudnike digitalnih storitev obenem onemogoča vzpostavitev globalnega in učinkovitega mehanizma za sodelovanje na ravni Unije.
Universities and research centres have a decisive role to play in spurring research, development and innovation in those areas.
Univerze in raziskovalni centri imajo odločilno vlogo pri spodbujanju raziskav, razvoja in inovacij na teh področjih.
Responding effectively to the challenges of the security of network and information systems therefore requires a global approach at Union level covering common minimum capacity building and planning requirements, exchange of information, cooperation and common security requirements for operators of essential services and digital service providers.
Za učinkovito odzivanje na izzive na področju varnosti omrežij in informacijskih sistemov je zato potreben globalni pristop na ravni Unije, ki bo obsegal skupne minimalne zahteve za vzpostavitev in načrtovanje zmogljivosti, izmenjavo informacij ter sodelovanje in skupne varnostne zahteve za izvajalce bistvenih storitev in ponudnike digitalnih storitev.
However, operators of essential services and digital service providers are not precluded from implementing security measures that are stricter than those provided for under this Directive.
Vendar izvajalcem bistvenih storitev in ponudnikom digitalnih storitev nič ne preprečuje, da izvajajo varnostne ukrepe, ki so strožji od tistih, ki so določeni v tej direktivi.
To cover all relevant incidents and risks, this Directive should apply to both operators of essential services and digital service providers.
Da bi bili zajeti vsi ustrezni incidenti in tveganja, bi se morala ta direktiva uporabljati tako za izvajalce bistvenih storitev kot tudi ponudnike digitalnih storitev.
However, the obligations on operators of essential services and digital service providers should not apply to undertakings providing public communication networks or publicly available electronic communication services within the meaning of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], which are subject to the specific security and integrity requirements laid down in that Directive, nor should they apply to trust service providers within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4], which are subject to the security requirements laid down in that Regulation.
Vendar se obveznosti izvajalcev bistvenih storitev in ponudnikov digitalnih storitev ne bi smele uporabljati za podjetja, ki zagotavljajo javna komunikacijska omrežja ali javno dostopne elektronske komunikacijske storitve v smislu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/21/ES [3], za katera veljajo posebne zahteve glede varnosti in celovitosti, določene v navedeni direktivi; prav tako se ne bi smele uporabljati za ponudnike storitev zaupanja v smislu Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4], za katere veljajo varnostne zahteve iz navedene uredbe.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the possibility for each Member State to take the necessary measures to ensure the protection of the essential interests of its security, to safeguard public policy and public security, and to allow for the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v možnost vsake države članice, da sprejme potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi zavaruje bistvene interese svoje varnosti, zaščiti javni red in javno varnost ter omogoči preiskovanje, odkrivanje in pregon kaznivih dejanj.
In accordance with Article 346 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), no Member State is to be obliged to supply information the disclosure of which it considers to be contrary to the essential interests of its security.
V skladu s členom 346 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) nobena država članica ni dolžna dajati informacij, za katere meni, da bi bilo njihovo razkritje v nasprotju z bistvenimi interesi njene varnosti.
In this context, Council Decision 2013/488/EU [5] and non-disclosure agreements, or informal non-disclosure agreements such as the Traffic Light Protocol, are of relevance.
V tem smislu so pomembni Sklep Sveta 2013/488/EU [5] in sporazumi o nerazkritju informacij ali neuradni sporazumi o nerazkritju informacij, kot je semaforski protokol (Traffic Light Protocol).
Certain sectors of the economy are already regulated or may be regulated in the future by sector-specific Union legal acts that include rules related to the security of network and information systems.
Sektorski pravni akti Unije, ki vsebujejo pravila o varnosti omrežij in informacijskih sistemov, že urejajo ali pa morda še bodo urejali nekatere sektorje ekonomije.
Whenever those Union legal acts contain provisions imposing requirements concerning the security of network and information systems or notifications of incidents, those provisions should apply if they contain requirements which are at least equivalent in effect to the obligations contained in this Directive.
Kadar ti pravni akti Unije vsebujejo določbe, ki uvajajo zahteve glede varnosti omrežij in informacijskih sistemov ali priglasitve incidentov, bi se morale te določbe uporabljati, če vsebujejo zahteve, ki so po učinku najmanj enake obveznostim iz te direktive.
Member States should then apply the provisions of such sector-specific Union legal acts, including those relating to jurisdiction, and should not carry out the identification process for operators of essential services as defined by this Directive.
V tem primeru bi morale države članice uporabljati določbe iz sektorskih pravnih aktov Unije, tudi tiste, ki se nanašajo na pristojnost, in ne bi smele izvesti postopka določitve izvajalcev bistvenih storitev, kot je določeno v tej direktivi.
In this context, Member States should provide information to the Commission on the application of such lex specialis provisions.
V zvezi s tem bi morale države članice Komisijo obvestiti o uporabi takih določb lex specialis.
In determining whether the requirements on the security of network and information systems and the notification of incidents contained in sector-specific Union legal acts are equivalent to those contained in this Directive, regard should only be had to the provisions of relevant Union legal acts and their application in the Member States.
Pri ugotavljanju, ali so zahteve glede varnosti omrežij in informacijskih sistemov ter priglasitve incidentov iz sektorskih pravnih aktov Unije enakovredne zahtevam iz te direktive, bi bilo treba upoštevati samo določbe ustreznih pravnih aktov Unije in njihovo uporabo v državah članicah.
In the water transport sector, security requirements for companies, ships, port facilities, ports and vessel traffic services under Union legal acts cover all operations, including radio and telecommunication systems, computer systems and networks.
Varnostne zahteve iz pravnih aktov Unije v sektorju vodnega prometa, ki veljajo za podjetja, ladje, pristaniško infrastrukturo, pristanišča in storitve ladijskega prometa, se nanašajo na vse dejavnosti, med drugim na radijske in telekomunikacijske sisteme, računalniške sisteme in omrežja.
Part of the mandatory procedures to be followed includes the reporting of all incidents and should therefore be considered as lex specialis, in so far as those requirements are at least equivalent to the corresponding provisions of this Directive.
Med obvezne postopke, ki jih je treba izpolnjevati, sodi priglasitev vseh incidentov, ki bi zato morala šteti za lex specialis, če so te zahteve najmanj enakovredne ustreznim zahtevam iz te direktive.
When identifying operators in the water transport sector, Member States should take into account existing and future international codes and guidelines developed in particular by the International Maritime Organisation, with a view to providing individual maritime operators with a coherent approach.
Države članice bi morale pri določanju izvajalcev v sektorju vodnega prometa upoštevati obstoječe in prihodnje mednarodne zakonike in smernice, zlasti tiste, ki jih je oblikovala Mednarodna pomorska organizacija, da se posameznim izvajalcem v pomorskem sektorju zagotovi usklajen pristop.
Regulation and supervision in the sectors of banking and financial market infrastructures is highly harmonised at Union level, through the use of primary and secondary Union law and standards developed together with the European supervisory authorities.
Urejanje in nadzor v bančnem sektorju in sektorju infrastruktur finančnega trga sta na ravni Unije že visoko harmonizirana v okviru primarnega in sekundarnega prava Unije, pa tudi standardov, oblikovanih v sodelovanju z evropskimi nadzornimi organi.
Within the banking union, the application and the supervision of those requirements are ensured by the single supervisory mechanism.
Uporaba in nadzor teh zahtev sta v okviru bančne unije zagotovljena z enotnim mehanizmom nadzora.
For Member States that are not part of the banking union, this is ensured by the relevant banking regulators of Member States.
Za države članice, ki niso del bančne unije, ju zagotavljajo ustrezni bančni regulativni organi držav članic.
In other areas of financial sector regulation, the European System of Financial Supervision also ensures a high degree of commonality and convergence in supervisory practices.
Na drugih področjih urejanja finančnega sektorja pa Evropski sistem finančnega nadzora prav tako zagotavlja visoko stopnjo enakosti in konvergence nadzornih praks.
The European Securities Markets Authority also plays a direct supervision role for certain entities, namely credit-rating agencies and trade repositories.
Tudi Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge ima neposredno nadzorno vlogo nad določenimi subjekti, in sicer bonitetnimi agencijami in repozitoriji sklenjenih poslov.