natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to assess whether an advantage was conferred to the owners or the operators (NG, MSR and CMHN until 30 April 2010, and also NAG from 1 May 2010 to 31 October 2012), the market economy investor principle shall therefore be applied.
Vendar v tem konkretnem primeru pomoč vključuje samo poroštvo (ukrep 12) in ne posojil (ukrep 11), saj Komisija ne more izključiti, da bi zasebni upnik podjetju MSR odobril posojila pod primerljivimi pogoji zaradi poroštva zvezne dežele (ukrep 12).
First of all, measures 1 to 19 are not pari passu transactions [151] because Germany had not found a private investor who would invest under comparable conditions (for instance, in Part I of the ‘Nürburgring 2009’ project).
Komisija ugotavlja, da podjetji Mediinvest in PNG nista bili dejanska prejemnika pomoči, ampak sta delovala zgolj kot posrednika, da bi posojila podjetja RIM dosegla podjetje MSR.
There were two loans provided by private operators, but their amounts were small taking account of the amounts of public investment, these loans related only to Part II of the ‘Nürburgring 2009’ project (i.e. mainly to hotels) [152], and they were granted only to CMHN or MSR, but not to NG or another aid beneficiary:
Poleg tega je le podjetje Mediinvest z navedenimi storitvami ustvarilo dobiček, ki je ustrezal največ 4,3-odstotni razliki med obrestnimi merami (med posojili, ki jih je prejelo od podjetja RIM, in posojili, ki jih je odobrilo podjetju MSR), podjetje PNG pa ni imelo koristi od razlike med obrestnimi merami (posojilo, ki ga je podjetje PNG prejelo od podjetja Mediinvest, je imelo enako obrestno mero kot posojilo, ki ga je podjetje PNG odobrilo podjetju MSR).
Table 14
Poleg tega Komisija ob upoštevanju podatkov iz uvodnih izjav 32 do 34 in preglednice 14 ne more zaključiti, da sta podjetji Mediinvest in PNG za svoje storitve zaračunali obrestne mere, ki ne ustrezajo tržnim pogojem, ali da je razlika med obrestnimi merami, ki sta jo prejeli (največ 4,3 % za Mediinvest in 0 % za PNG), presegla tržne ravni.
Loans granted by private financial institutions to CMHN/MSR
Na podlagi navedenega Komisija meni, da podjetji Mediinvest in PNG nista bili upravičenca ukrepa 11.
Amount (EUR million)
Noben zasebni vlagatelj ne bi zagotovil poroštva podjetju v tako slabem finančnem položaju.
Collaterals
Na podlagi navedenega meni, da ukrep 12 pomeni državno pomoč.
(EUR million)
Znesek pomoči, ki ga je podjetje MSR prejelo od zvezne dežele prek poroštva, je enak znesku zadevnih posojil (ukrep 11), tj. 85484000 EUR.
Bank for Tirol and Vorarlberg
V zvezi z ukrepom 13 (nepovratna sredstva od davka na igre na srečo za spodbujanje turizma, ki jih je zvezna dežela dodelila podjetju NG) Komisija meni, da turistično politiko uresničujejo javni organi, vlagatelji v tržnem gospodarstvu pa ne bi izvedli zadevnih ukrepov v korist podjetij v težavah, saj bi to močno škodilo njihovim finančnim interesom.
pledging shares of MSR
Na kratko, davčni prihodki v višini 1,6 milijona EUR leta 2009, 3,2 milijona EUR leta 2010 in 3,2 milijona EUR leta 2011, ki so bili preneseni z zvezne dežele na podjetje NG, pomenijo pomoč v korist podjetja NG.
In any case, Germany acknowledges that also for Part II no long-term private investor was found.
Za ukrep 14 (posojila zvezne dežele podjetju NG in podreditev dolgov) prav tako veljajo pojasnila glede ukrepa 13 v zvezi s turistično politiko.
Furthermore, for the period from 2006 to 2010, the Commission received business plans for the ‘Nürburgring 2009’ project and for NG as such:
Poleg tega zagotovitev posojila podjetjem v takih težavah, ki jih noben zasebni vlagatelj ne bi nikakor financiral, vključuje prednost za podjetja, ki je enaka znesku posojila.
Business plans for the Nürburgring 2009 project (EUR million)
Zvezna dežela je 29. avgusta 2007 razglasila podreditev dolgov v zvezi z navedenim posojilom v znesku 20 milijonov EUR, da bi preprečila insolventnost podjetja NG, pri čemer je svoje terjatve do podjetja NG prestavila na zadnje mesto na seznamu terjatev vseh upnikov do podjetja NG.
Relevant entity/activity
Na podlagi navedenega Komisija ugotavlja, da je podreditev (del ukrepa 14) prednost, ločena od posojila v znesku 20 milijonov EUR, ki je tudi del ukrepa 14, saj je podreditev bistveno zmanjšala možnost zvezne dežele za uspešno izterjavo svojih terjatev do podjetja NG.
Costs
Kar zadeva ukrep 15 (prevzem delnic podjetja MSR s strani podjetij NG in RIM), je bilo podjetje MSR v času ukrepa v težavah, kar pomeni, da je ustvarjalo izgube.
Turnover (2009-2020)
To pa pomeni, da je bil znesek, ki je izhajal iz njegovega poslovanja in je bil dan na voljo delničarjem, negativen.
Result EBT (2009-2020)
V tem smislu je bila vrednost vsake delnice podjetja MSR, ki je temeljila na njegovem poslovanju, negativna.
17 [154]
Z drugimi besedami, morebitni vlagatelj v podjetje MSR bi dejansko zahteval, da se mu izplača znesek, ki ustreza izgubam podjetja MSR, ki izhajajo iz poslovanja podjetja in so izražene v vsaki od njegovih delnic.
35 [154]
Jasno je, da sta podjetji NG in RIM z nakupom podjetja MSR nameravali podpreti to podjetje.
NG, MSR, CHMN consolidated [155]
Vendar sprememba lastnika sama po sebi ne vključuje pomoči podjetju MSR.
769 [156]
Ukrepi, ki bi sledili spremembi lastništva (npr. posojila podjetja NG podjetju MSR), pa bi vključevali pomoč podjetju MSR.
269 [156]
Pravna oblika podjetja MSR je taka, da delničarji niso odgovorni za obveznosti podjetja, prodaja podjetja MSR podjetjema NG in RIM s strani njegovih prejšnjih lastnikov pa vključuje samo simbolično ceno, ki je bila plačana prodajalcem in je ustrezala prodajni ceni, tj. 3 EUR.
59 [156]
Zato Komisija meni, da cena 1 EUR na delnico ne pomeni gospodarske prednosti za prodajalce delnic podjetja MSR, tj. podjetja Mediinvest, Geisler & Trimmel in Weber.
From Table 15, it is obvious that the estimated costs were increasing constantly during the preparation of the ‘Nürburgring 2009’ project while the latter's profits (EBT) were decreasing significantly, from profits of EUR 22 million in December 2005 to losses of EUR — 35 million in December 2009.
Ukrep 16 vključuje delničarsko posojilo in subvencijo zvezne dežele podjetju NG za dirke formule 1.
Part of measures 1, 2 and 3 were applied before the first plan of December 2005.
Poleg tega je podjetje NG julija 2011 prejelo subvencijo iz proračuna zvezne dežele v višini 13,5 milijonov EUR.
Therefore those measures cannot be considered as having been decided on the basis of the business plans in question.
V zvezi s to javno subvencijo je prednost za podjetje NG očitna, saj je podjetje oproščeno bremena, ki bi ga moralo običajno nositi.
Also as regards the first business plan (December 2005), part of measures 2 and 3 were granted at the same time with it.
Posojilo ni v skladu z načelom vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu.
In this regard, the Commission notes that those measures were granted in a context of continuous public support, which had started already earlier (in 2002 or earlier), without any private support and in favour of a firm in a worsening financial situation.
Zagotovitev posojila podjetju v takih težavah, ki ga noben zasebni vlagatelj ne bi nikakor financiral, vključuje prednost za podjetje, ki je enaka znesku posojila.
Thus, the part of measures 2 and 3 in question cannot be taken in isolation from the ones granted prior to them (part of measures 1, 2 and 3), but they form a continuity of the latter and therefore the part of measures 2 and 3 at hand has to be considered as granting a further advantage.
Zato je prednost, ki jo je zvezna dežela 11. januarja 2011 zagotovila podjetju NG prek posojila v višini 40405000 EUR, enaka 40405000 EUR.
Part of measures 2 and 3 was applied at a time when already the first three business plans, of December 2005, March 2006 and August 2006, had been issued.
Prednost, ki jo je zvezna dežela julija 2011 zagotovila podjetju NG prek subvencije v višini 13,5 milijona EUR, je enaka znesku subvencije, tj. 13,5 milijona EUR.
However, the Commission notes that those plans' forecasts for NG's future sales and profits remained identical, despite the significant worsening of NG's actual results in the same period (negative equity, significant increase of debt, reduction of sales, annual losses).
Nemčija je v zvezi s koncesijsko pogodbo za formulo 1 (ukrep 17) trdila, da organizacija dirk formule 1 pomeni ukrep pomoči, ki je skladen s pravili o storitvah splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
On this basis, the business plans in question cannot be considered as realistic and acceptable, since they disregarded the company's bad recent historic data and kept the same forecasts as before. (d) The first six business plans (December 2005, March 2006, August 2006, November 2007 and December 2008) did not concern the future operations of NG as a whole but only partially, because they did not take into account the Formula 1 activity.
Vendar Nemčija ne trdi, da je bil ukrep nadomestilo, ki ne vključuje pomoči in izpolnjuje vse zahteve iz sodbe v zadevi Altmark.
On this basis, the business plans in question cannot be considered as a reliable basis for deciding financial support to NG.
Poleg tega Nemčija ni zagotovila dokazov, da je bila koncesijska dajatev določena na tržni ravni na podlagi strokovnega mnenja ali tržnega poročila ali da je objavila razpis za dodelitev koncesije.
The business plans of March 2009-December 2009 included forecasts also for the Formula 1 activity.
Ker ni elementov, ki bi dokazovali skladnost ukrepa s tržnimi pravili, Komisija meni, da koncesijska pogodba pomeni prednost za podjetje NAG.
However, for the whole period 2009-2020, the Formula 1 activity was forecasted to bring losses, with sales which were forecasted to remain stable and at the same level as before 2009, therefore it appears that the Formula 1 activity was not foreseen to be restructured.
Znesek pomoči, ki ga vsebuje ta ukrep, bi bil načeloma enak razliki med koncesijsko dajatvijo in tržno vrednostjo koncesije.
Two business plans from July 2010 and September 2010 foresaw losses until 2030, under the worst case scenario, therefore, the activity was not foreseen to be viable.
Zato odložitev plačila zneskov v višini 1,473 milijona EUR v primeru podjetja NG, 1,205 milijona EUR v primeru podjetja MSR in 303000 EUR v primeru podjetja CMHN, ki jo je 15. maja 2012 odobrila banka ISB, vključuje pomoč tem podjetjem, ki je enaka znesku odloženih neporavnanih posojil.
Finally, one plan of September 2010 foresaw earnings between 2016 and 2030, however, that plan did not include sensitivity analysis (i.e. worst case scenario results).
Zato Komisija meni, da ta ukrep ni izpolnjeval pogojev iz obvestila o poroštvih, torej je upravičencem zagotovil prednost in zato pomeni državno pomoč, ter (b) zaradi podreditve terjatev zvezne dežele, ki izhajajo iz navedenega poroštva, iz leta 2012 so bile te terjatve prestavljene na zadnje mesto na seznamu terjatev vseh upnikov podjetij NG, MSR in CMHN.
In any case, that plan's forecasts ignored the significant worsening of NG's actual results in the same period (negative equity, significant increase of debt, reduction of sales, annual losses).
V zvezi s tem Komisija ugotavlja, da upnik v tržnem gospodarstvu ne bi sprejel take podreditve obstoječih terjatev do podjetij v hudih težavah, saj bi tak ukrep pomenil dejansko izgubo terjatev.
On this basis, the business plan in question cannot be considered as realistic and acceptable, since it disregarded the company's bad recent historic data.
Znesek ukrepa je enak znesku povezanega dolga, tj. 254 milijonov EUR, na katerega sta se nanašala poroštvo in podreditev iz leta 2012.
On the basis of the above, the Commission cannot consider that any public support to NG as a firm in difficulty (see Section 5.1 above), which aimed at financing its operations at the time (operation of race ring) or in the future (operation of race ring together with new hotels), would be deemed as market conform on the basis of the business plans in question.
Komisija meni, da se navedeni ukrepi nanašajo na upravljanje kompleksa, ki se ne šteje za splošno infrastrukturo, in da ukrepi niso bili sprejeti na podlagi pričakovanj, da bo prispevek države zagotovil donos v skladu s tržnimi pogoji.
As for the market economy investor principle, the following can be stated for the individual measures:
Zato meni, da obstaja državna pomoč za izgradnjo in upravljanje navedenih objektov v korist njihovega upravljavca, tj. zlasti podjetja NG.
For measure 1 (provision of capital by the Land and the district of Ahrweiler to NG in the form of payments in capital reserve and capital increases), the Commission notes that the analysis presented above for the submitted business plans is relevant.
Komisija meni tudi, da je element državne pomoči enak razliki med primerno tržno vrednostjo posojila ali poroštva in dejansko ceno, ki je bila plačana za navedeni ukrep, ker pa so bili upravičenci do pomoči v tako hudih težavah, da na trgu ne bi našli nobenega financiranja, je prednost, ki izhaja iz pomoči, enaka skupnemu znesku zadevnih ukrepov.
No private investor would have provided capital to NG in 2004 and in the following years.
Sklep o obstoju državne pomoči
Therefore, the capital provided by the Land to NG on 1 May 2002 (amounting to EUR 2179000) and on 21 December 2004 (amounting to EUR 22839241), as well as the capital provided by the Land and the district of Ahrweiler on 31 August 2004 (amounting to EUR 4887000) and 4 September 2007 (amounting to EUR 10000000) involve aid which is equal to the full amount of capital provided.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega Komisija meni, da del ukrepa 2 (posojila, ki jih je podjetje NG odobrilo podjetju FZS) ter ukrepi 8, 11 in 15 ne pomenijo pomoči, ukrep 1, del ukrepa 2 (posojila, ki jih je podjetje NG odobrilo podjetjem EWN, MAN, TTI, Camp4Fun, BWN1, BWNB in BWN2) ter ukrepi 3 do 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14 in 16 do 19 pa pomenijo državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
As regards measure 2 (shareholder loans by NG before the ‘Nürburgring 2009’ project), on the basis of the financial data submitted by the German authorities, the Commission notes that EWN, Camp 4 Fun and TTI had annual losses and negative equity when each of them received its part of measure 2 (see Tables 1-4 above).
NEZAKONITA POMOČ
At the same time BWN1, BWNB and BWN2, which received loans in the period 2004-2007, had annual losses during that whole period and also negative equity in 2005, 2006 and 2007.
Ukrep 1, del ukrepa 2 (posojila podjetja NG podjetjem EWN, MAN, TTI, Camp4Fun, BWN1, BWNB in BWN2) ter ukrepi 3–7, 9, 10, 12–14 in 16–19, ki pomenijo pomoč, so bili dodeljeni v nasprotju z obveznostma priglasitve in mirovanja iz člena 108(3) PDEU.
Finally, MAN had both accumulated and annual losses when it received its part of measure 2.
Zato Komisija meni, da ti ukrepi pomenijo nezakonito državno pomoč.
Therefore, on the basis of point 11 of the R&R Guidelines, the Commission considers that those companies were in difficulty at the time of measure 2.
ZDRUŽLJIVOST POMOČI
On the other hand, on the basis of the financial data submitted by the German authorities, the Commission notes that FSZ was not in difficulty when it received its part of measure 2, because its financial data did not demonstrate any of the signs of point 11 of the R&R Guidelines.
Ker nekateri ukrepi pomenijo državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU, je treba njihovo združljivost oceniti ob upoštevanju izjem iz odstavkov 2 in 3 navedenega člena.
The provision of loans to companies in such difficulties that no private investor would have financed at any rate, especially since those companies belonged to a company which itself was in severe financial difficulty (NG), involves an advantage to these companies, which is equal to the amount of the loans.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča so države članice tiste, ki morajo uveljavljati morebitne razloge za združljivost in dokazati, da so pogoji za takšno združljivost izpolnjeni [163].
Therefore, the loans granted by NG to its subsidiaries, namely EWN (EUR 6195170,02), BWN/BWNB (EUR 3760000), Camp4Fun (EUR 450000), MAN (EUR 100000) and TTI (EUR 25000) are not compliant with the market economy investor principle.
Glede na to, da ukrepi pomenijo državno pomoč in da so bila podjetja NG, MSR in CMHN podjetja v težavah od leta 2002, 2007 oziroma 2008, Komisija ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba združljivost zadevnih ukrepov oceniti samo v skladu s členom 107(3)(c) PDEU in zlasti v skladu s smernicami za reševanje in prestrukturiranje.
In this context, it is noted that the loans granted to MAN and TTI are below the de minimis threshold, but Germany has neither argued not provided that all the conditions of the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 [157] were fulfilled;
V skladu s točko 20 smernic za reševanje in prestrukturiranje „se [podjetje v težavah,] dokler ni zagotovljena njegova sposobnost preživetja, […] toliko časa ne more šteti k ustreznim instrumentom za pospeševanje drugih ciljev javne politike.
that Regulation could be applied in the recovery phase if Germany demonstrates that all the conditions of the Regulation are met.
Posledično Komisija meni, da lahko zgolj ob izpolnjevanju pogojev, opredeljenih v teh smernicah, pomoč podjetjem v težavah prispeva k razvoju gospodarskih dejavnosti, ne da bi ob tem škodila trgovini v tolikšni meri, ki je v nasprotju z interesom Skupnosti“.
Furthermore, the Commission notes that the loans granted to FSZ (EUR 646738,12) did not confer an advantage to the latter, since they were granted at the interest rate of 6 % which is at market level because it corresponds to the sum of Germany's base rate at the time of the granting of the loans (5,06 % in April 2002, 4,8 % in March 2003 and 5,19 % in March 2008) [158] and the basis points to be added for FSZ's financial condition (100 basis points) taking into account that it did not present any of the signs of point 11 of the R&R Guidelines when it received those loans [159].
V nasprotju s trditvami Nemčije izjema iz člena 106(2) PDEU v obravnavanem primeru ne velja, saj dejavnosti, za katere je bila dodeljena pomoč, ni mogoče šteti za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ker očitno pomenijo dejavnosti komercialnega značaja, ki se izvajajo v sektorjih, v katerih vlada konkurenca.
Regarding measure 3 (loans grated to NG from the liquidity pool of the Land), Germany does not put forward any evidence to demonstrate that NG did not benefit from interest rates that were more advantageous compared with the conditions of its competitors.
Poleg tega v tem primeru ne velja niti izjema iz člena 107(3)(d) PDEU, saj dejavnosti, za katere je bila dodeljena pomoč, očitno niso povezane s kulturo ali ohranjanjem kulturne dediščine.
Finally, the eventual repayment of the funds and the corresponding interest is an ex post event, unknown at the time of the granting of the measures;
Nemški organi niso predložili niti načrta za likvidacijo.
therefore it cannot be taken into account for the market economy investor test.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega Komisija meni, da so ukrep 1, del ukrepa 2 (posojila podjetja NG podjetjem EWN, MAN, TTI, Camp4Fun, BWN1, BWNB in BWN2) ter ukrepi 3–7, 9, 10, 12–14 in 16–19 nezdružljivi s PDEU.
Therefore, the measures financed by the liquidity pool were not performed on market terms.
VRAČILO
The provision of loans to a company in such difficulties that no private investor would have financed it at any rate involves an advantage to the company which is equal to the amount of the loans.
Komisija je v skladu s PDEU in ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča pristojna za odločanje, ali mora zadevna država članica ukiniti ali spremeniti pomoč, za katero je Komisija ugotovila, da je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom [165].
In sum, the granting of loans by the Land to NG between 30 June 2003 and 11 May 2010 (see the list of loans in Table 5) involves aid of EUR 399805370.
Prav tako Sodišče dosledno meni, da je namen obveznosti države, da ukine pomoč, za katero Komisija meni, da ni združljiva z notranjim trgom, ponovna vzpostavitev prejšnjih razmer [166].
Under the same test as above, the Commission concludes the same for measure 4 (loan granted by NG to MSR).
V zvezi s tem je Sodišče odločilo, da je ta cilj dosežen, ko prejemnik odplača znesek, ki mu je bil dodeljen v okviru nezakonite pomoči, s čimer izgubi prednost, ki jo je užival glede na konkurente na trgu, ter se ponovno vzpostavijo razmere pred plačilom pomoči [167].
Indeed, it cannot be accepted that at the time of the measure (December 2007), there would be any financing available in the market for a company in MSR's financial difficulties (see Table 12 and recital 155), at any interest rate.
V skladu s sodno prakso člen 14(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 [168] določa, da „če se v primerih nezakonite pomoči sprejmejo negativne odločbe, Komisija odloči, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da upravičenec vrne pomoč[…]“.
The provision of a loan to a company in such difficulties that no private investor would have financed it at any rate involves an advantage to the company, which is equal to the amount of the loan.
Ker zadevni ukrepi v nasprotju s členom 108 PDEU niso bili priglašeni Komisiji in jih je zato treba obravnavati kot nezakonito in nezdružljivo pomoč, je treba to pomoč vrniti, da se ponovno vzpostavijo razmere na trgu, kakršne so bile pred dodelitvijo pomoči.
Therefore, the advantage granted by NG to MSR through the loan of EUR 300000 on 27 December 2007 is equal to EUR 300000.
Vračilo pomoči bi moralo zato zajeti obdobje od datuma, ko je bila upravičencu dodeljena prednost, tj. ko mu je bila pomoč dana na voljo, do datuma njenega dejanskega vračila, zneskom, ki jih je treba vrniti, pa je treba prišteti obresti do datuma dejanskega vračila.
The support provided by NG to CST (measure 5) does not comply with the market economy investor principle.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so nekateri upravičenci do pomoči (podjetja NG, MSR, CMHN, CST [169] in IPC) v postopku zaradi insolventnosti [170].
The provision of loans to a company in such difficulties that no private investor would have financed at any rate, especially since CST belonged to a company which itself was in severe financial difficulty (NG), involves an advantage to the company, which is equal to the amount of the loan.
Zato pogosto ni mogoče ponovno vzpostaviti predhodnega stanja na običajen način.
Therefore the advantage granted by NG to CST through the loans of a total amount of EUR 11032060 provided to it between the 27 August 2008 and the 18 April 2011 is equal to the amount of the loans.
Ker je končni cilj vračila ukinitev izkrivljanja konkurence, je Sodišče razsodilo, da se lahko v tovrstnih primerih likvidacija upravičenca šteje za sprejemljivo rešitev glede vračila [172].
As regards the letter of comfort, the Commission notes that it was granted by NG to CST on 23 December 2009 and constituted a commitment of NG, by which it would fund the repayment of financial obligations of CST, which CST itself was unable to repay.
Komisija zato meni, da se lahko sklep, ki od države članice zahteva izterjavo nezakonite in nezdružljive pomoči od plačilno nesposobnega upravičenca, obravnava kot pravilno izvršen, ko se vrne celoten znesek pomoči ali, v primeru delnega vračila, ko se obveznost v zvezi z vračilom pomoči ustrezno vpiše na seznam terjatev in je podjetje likvidirano, njegova sredstva pa se prodajo pod tržnimi pogoji, kar pomeni dokončno prenehanje njegovih dejavnosti.
The funding of such financial obligations would take place through loans by NG to CST, with an interest rate of 6 %.
Bolj na splošno bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da noben gospodarski subjekt ne bo imel koristi od nezakonite in nezdružljive pomoči po izbrisu upravičenca.
The commitment also included a subordination of the claims of NG stemming from those loans, funded by NG on the basis of the comfort letter of 23 December 2009, which foresaw that NG's relevant claims against CST would rank in the last position of all creditors' claims against CST.
Vračilo zadeva tudi upravičence, ki niso v postopku zaradi insolventnosti, tj. NAG ter BikeWorld GmbH za BWN1, BWNB in BWN2 (podjetje BWN1 se je združilo s podjetjem BWNB, nato pa se je prevzemno podjetje BWNB preimenovalo v BWN2, to podjetje pa se je pozneje preimenovalo v BikeWorld GmbH).