natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this case, the volumes allegedly sold by the exporting producer on the Union market during 2013 were less than half of the volumes allegedly sold on the Union market during the review investigation period, whereas its total sales and production volumes were in the same range for both years.
V tem primeru je obseg blaga, ki naj bi ga proizvajalec izvoznik prodal na trgu Unije v letu 2013, pomenil manj kot polovico obsega blaga, ki naj bi se v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom domnevno prodal na trgu Unije, skupni obseg prodaje in proizvodnje pa je bil za obe leti v enakem razponu.
It is thus clear in this case that in relative terms the addition of 2013 would decrease the representativeness of the exporting producer's Union sales whereas in absolute terms it would only provide limited improvement.
Zato je jasno, da bi se v tem primeru z upoštevanjem leta 2013 v relativnem smislu zmanjšala reprezentativnost prodaje proizvajalca izvoznika v Unijo, v absolutnem smislu pa bi se tako doseglo le omejeno izboljšanje.
Therefore, the Commission confirms that there is no valid justification for extending the review investigation period beyond the one-year period usually applied by the Commission.
Zato Komisija potrjuje, da ni utemeljenega razloga za razširitev obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom na več kot obdobje enega leta, ki ga Komisija običajno uporablja.
The product under review is tube and pipe fittings (other than cast fittings, flanges and threaded fittings), of iron or steel (not including stainless steel), with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 609,6 mm, of a kind used for butt-welding or other purposes, originating in the Republic of Korea, currently falling within CN codes ex73079311, ex73079319 and ex73079980 (‘the product concerned’).
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, je pribor (fitingi) za cevi (razen litega pribora (fitingov), prirobnic in fitingov z navojem) iz železa ali jekla (razen nerjavnega jekla), z največjim zunanjim premerom do vključno 609,6 mm, ki se uporablja za čelno varjenje ali druge namene, s poreklom iz Republike Koreje, trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex73079311, ex73079319 in ex73079980 („zadevni izdelek“).
The review investigation confirmed that the product produced by the exporting producer, sold domestically and exported to the Union and other export markets, has the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics and basic uses as the products sold in the Union by the Union industry.
Preiskava v zvezi s pregledom je potrdila, da ima izdelek, ki ga je proizvajal proizvajalec izvoznik in se je prodajal na domačem trgu ter izvažal v Unijo in na druge izvozne trge, enake osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemijske lastnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo kot izdelki, ki jih v Uniji prodaja industrija Unije.
The Commission first examined whether the total volume of domestic sales for the exporting producer was representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali je celotni obseg domače prodaje proizvajalca izvoznika reprezentativen.
On this basis, the total sales by the exporting producer of the like product on the domestic market were representative.
Na podlagi tega je bilo za proizvajalca izvoznika ugotovljeno, da je bil njegov celotni obseg prodaje podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu reprezentativen.
The Commission subsequently identified the product types sold domestically that were identical or comparable with the product types sold for export to the Union.
Komisija je nato opredelila vrste izdelkov, prodane na domačem trgu, ki so bile enake ali primerljive z vrstami izdelkov, prodanimi za izvoz v Unijo.
The Commission then examined whether the domestic sales by the exporting producer on its domestic market for each product type that is identical or comparable with a product type sold for export to the Union were representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Zatem je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali je domača prodaja proizvajalca izvoznika na njegovem domačem trgu reprezentativna za posamezne vrste izdelka, ki so enake vrstam, prodanim za izvoz v Unijo, ali primerljive z njimi.
The domestic sales of a product type are representative if the total volume of domestic sales of that product type to independent customers during the investigation period represents at least 5 % of the total volume of export sales of the identical or comparable product type to the Union.
Domača prodaja vrste izdelka je reprezentativna, če celotni obseg domače prodaje navedene vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam v obdobju preiskave predstavlja vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza enake ali primerljive vrste izdelka v Unijo.
The Commission established that most product types were representative.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bila večina vrst izdelka reprezentativnih.
The normal value is based on the actual domestic price per product type, irrespective of whether those sales are profitable or not, if:
Normalna vrednost temelji na dejanski domači ceni za posamezno vrsto izdelka ne glede na to, ali je bila navedena prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne:
the weighted average sales price of that product type is equal to or higher than the unit cost of production.
V tem primeru je normalna vrednost tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje te vrste izdelka v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
In this case, the normal value is the weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that product type during the review investigation period.
Normalna vrednost je dejanska domača cena za posamezno vrsto izdelka, in sicer izključno pri dobičkonosni domači prodaji te vrste izdelka v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom:
The normal value is the actual domestic price per product type of only the profitable domestic sales of the product types during the review investigation period, if:
če je tehtana povprečna cena te vrste izdelka nižja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto.
the weighted average price of this product type is below the unit cost of production.
V skladu s tem se je normalna vrednost izračunala le kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje.
The analysis of domestic sales showed that a large majority of all domestic sales were profitable and that the weighted average sales price was higher than the cost of production.
Če ni bilo prodaje ali zadostne prodaje določene vrste podobnega izdelka v običajnem trgovskem prometu ali je ni bilo dovolj ali če določena vrsta izdelka ni bila prodana v reprezentativnih količinah na domačem trgu, je Komisija konstruirala normalno vrednost v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
Accordingly, the normal value was calculated as a weighted average of the profitable sales only.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da se je povprečnim stroškom proizvodnje podobnega izdelka proizvajalca izvoznika v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom prištelo naslednje:
Where there were no or insufficient sales of a product type of the like product in the ordinary course of trade, or where a product type was not sold in representative quantities on the domestic market, the Commission constructed the normal value in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
tehtani povprečni dobiček, ki ga je v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom proizvajalec izvoznik dosegel pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v običajnem trgovskem prometu.
Normal value was constructed by adding the following to the average cost of production of the like product of the exporting producer during the review investigation period:
Za vrste izdelkov, ki na domačem trgu niso bili prodani v reprezentativnih količinah, so bili dodani povprečni PSA-stroški in dobiček od transakcij, opravljenih na domačem trgu v običajnem trgovskem prometu.
the weighted average profit realised by the exporting producer on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the review investigation period.
V obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom je proizvajalec izvoznik prodal le zanemarljivo količino zadevnega izdelka v Unijo, kar predstavlja med 0,1 % in 0,3 % obsega njegove proizvodnje (razpon je naveden zaradi zaupnosti).
For the product types not sold in representative quantities on the domestic market, the average SG&A expenses and profit of transactions made in the ordinary course of trade on the domestic market for those types were added.
Poleg tega proizvajalec izvoznik za številne transakcije ni mogel prepričljivo dokazati, da so bile protidampinške dajatve dejansko plačane, kar vzbuja dvom o tem, ali je bilo blago sproščeno v prosti promet na carinskem območju Unije.
For the product types not sold at all on the domestic market, the weighted average SG&A expenses and profit of all transactions made in the ordinary course of trade on the domestic market were added.
Prodaja je bila vsa namenjena za posebne projekte treh strank, ki so imele lastne specifikacije za pribor (fitinge).
Export price
Poleg tega je prodaja potekala v okviru „paketa“ skupaj z drugim priborom (fitingi) in izdelki, ki niso bili zadevni izdelek.
In the review investigation period only negligible volumes of the product concerned were sold by the exporting producer to the Union, representing between 0,1 % and 0,3 % of its production volume (range given for reasons of confidentiality).
V tem smislu se zdi tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije veliko.
In addition, for a number of transactions the exporting producer could not convincingly demonstrate that the anti-dumping duty had been effectively paid, which casts doubt on whether the goods had been released for free circulation in the Union customs territory.
Zaradi navedenega v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom na podlagi prodaje zadevnega izdelka v Unijo, ki jo je opravil proizvajalec izvoznik, ni bilo mogoče izvesti smiselne analize dampinga.
Moreover, those sales were all made to three customers for specific projects with their own specifications for fittings.
Ker obseg uvoza v Unijo ni bil zadosten, se je za določitev izvozne cene upošteval izvoz v druge tretje države.
In addition, the sales were made as a ‘package’ with other fittings and products that were not product concerned.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da ima proizvajalec izvoznik štiri glavne izvozne trge, ki v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom skupaj pokrivajo več kot 50 % njegovega izvoza v tretje države.
In this context, the risk of cross-compensation was deemed substantial.
Preostanek sestavlja 39 drugih izvoznih namembnih držav; vsaka od teh predstavlja med 0,1 % in 5 % celotnega izvoza proizvajalca izvoznika.
For the above reasons, no meaningful analysis of dumping based on Union sales of the product concerned from the exporting producer during the review investigation period could be made.
Cene izvoza v te države se med seboj zelo razlikujejo zaradi različne narave posameznega trga.
In the absence of sufficient export volumes to the Union, exports to other third countries were considered for the determination of the export price.
Veliko teh različnih dejavnikov (npr. pogoji konkurence na vsakem trgu) ni znanih.
It was found that the exporting producer has four major export markets, which together cover over 50 % of the exporting producer's export sales to third countries during the review investigation period.
Zato se je dodatno analiziralo, ali bi se katera od glavnih izvoznih namembnih držav proizvajalca izvoznika lahko uporabila kot približek za trg Unije.
The remainder consists of 39 other export destinations, each accounting for between 0,1 % to 5 % of the exporting producer's export sales.
Združeni arabski emirati („ZAE“) so v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom največji izvozni trg proizvajalca izvoznika, ki predstavljajo 15 %–18 % njegovega izvoza po masi in 15 %–18 % po vrednosti.
The export prices to these countries vary enormously reflecting the disparate nature of each market.
Vendar v ZAE ni domačih proizvajalcev zadevnega izdelka.
Many of these disparate factors (such as the conditions of competition on each market) are not known.
Zato se šteje, da je to stanje glede na gospodarsko strukturo precej drugačno od trga Unije.
Therefore, it was further analysed whether one of the exporting producer's major export destinations could be used as a proxy for the Union market.
Podobno kot v pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov, ki je izražen v Uredbi (EU) št. 1283/2014, se je zdelo primerno analizirati prodajo proizvajalca izvoznika v Združene države Amerike („ZDA“), ki so v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom druga največja izvozna namembna država.
The United Arab Emirates (‘UAE’) is the largest export market for the exporting producer and accounted for 15 %-18 % of the exporting producer's export sales in weight and 15 %-18 % in value during the review investigation period.
Preiskava je potrdila, da je trg ZDA podobne velikosti kot trg Unije, s številnimi domačimi proizvajalci, a tudi velikim deležem uvoza.
However, the UAE does not have domestic producers of the product concerned.
Potrdila je tudi, da je imel trg ZDA v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom nizke tarifne kvote uvoza in da ni bilo protidampinških dajatev na uvoz iz Koreje, zaradi česar je bil to zelo konkurenčen trg.
It is therefore deemed to be rather different in terms of economic structure compared to the Union market.
Poleg tega so ZDA na splošno glavna izvozna namembna država za izvoz iz Koreje in tudi za zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika;
As in the expiry review resulting in Regulation (EU) No 1283/2014, it was considered appropriate to analyse the exporting producer's sales to the United States (‘US’), which was the exporting producer's second biggest export destination in the review investigation period.
v ZDA je bilo v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom izvoženega 7 % do 12 % njegovega obsega proizvodnje in 11 % do 14 % njegovega izvoza.
The investigation confirmed that the US market is of a similar size to the Union market, with many domestic producers but also with a large proportion of imports.
Zato je bilo glede na okoliščine in posebnosti tega primera ugotovljeno, da bi v tej preiskavi ZDA predstavljale ustrezno podlago za določitev izvozne cene zaradi pomanjkanja zadostnega obsega izvoza v Unijo.
It also confirmed that the US market, in the review investigation period, had low import tariff rates and that no anti-dumping duties were applicable on imports from Korea, making it a very competitive market.
Tako je bila za določitev izvozne cene uporabljena preverjena izvozna cena proizvajalca izvoznika v ZDA, prilagojena na raven franko tovarna, pri čemer so se med drugim po potrebi upoštevali stroški prevoza, dajatev in davkov.
Furthermore, the US is indeed a major destination for exports from Korea in general and also for the exporting producer concerned, representing 7 % to 12 % of its production volume and 11 % to 14 % of its export sales during the review investigation period.
Po dokončnem razkritju je proizvajalec izvoznik oporekal, da njegovih prodajnih transakcij v Unijo s pravnega in dejanskega vidika ni mogoče uporabiti za določitev reprezentativne izvozne cene.
Therefore, based on the merits and specificities of this case it was considered that in this particular investigation the US would constitute a reasonable basis for establishing an export price in the absence of sufficient export volumes to the Union.
Prvič, proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da lahko Komisija obravnava izvozno ceno kot nezanesljivo le, če je določena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe, tako da obstaja povezava ali kompenzacijski dogovor med proizvajalcem izvoznikom in uvoznikom ali tretjo stranjo.
The verified export price of the exporting producer to the US was thus used for establishing an export price, adjusted back to an ex-works level by taking into account, where appropriate, for the costs of, inter alia, transport, duties and taxes.
V vseh drugih primerih bi morala Komisija osnovati izračun dampinga na izvozni ceni (Unije), če pa tega ne bi naredila, bi to pomenilo kršitev člena 2.3 Protidampinškega sporazuma STO.
Following final disclosure, the exporting producer contested that its Union sales transactions could not be used for establishing a representative export price, both on legal and on factual grounds.
V zvezi s tem se Komisija ne strinja z ozko razlago člena 2(9) osnovne uredbe, ki ni podprta s sodno prakso.
Firstly, the exporting producer claimed that the export price can only be considered as unreliable by the Commission if it is established pursuant to Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation that there is an association or compensatory arrangement between the exporting producer and the importer or a third party.
V členu 2(9) osnovne uredbe namreč ni določeno, da se mora preiskovalni organ opreti na nereprezentativen obseg izvoza, pri katerem se raven cen v nobenem primeru ne more šteti za pomembno glede na okoliščine, razložene v uvodni izjavi (29) in podrobno obravnavane v tem oddelku.
In all other cases, the Commission would have to base the calculation of dumping on the (Union) export price and not to do so would entail a breach under Article 2.3 of the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement.
Zato je treba trditve proizvajalca izvoznika zavrniti.
In this regard, the Commission does not agree with the narrow interpretation of Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, which is not supported by case-law.
Zelo majhne količine, ki jo predstavlja ta domnevna prodaja v Unijo, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (29), proizvajalec izvoznik ni izpodbijal.
There is indeed nothing in the provision of Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation that prescribes an investigating authority to rely on unrepresentative volumes of export sales whose level of prices could in any event not be regarded as meaningful given the circumstances explained in recital 29 and further discussed in detail in this section.
Tretjič, proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da s stvarnega vidika dejstvo, da je bil njegov izvoz v Unijo namenjen za posebne projekte z lastnimi specifikacijami, ni pomembno in da je predložil dokaze, da ni prišlo do navzkrižne kompenzacije.
Therefore, the claims of the exporting producer should be rejected.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da je bilo v razkritju navedeno, da je zaradi narave prodaje na trgu Unije obstajalo tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije z drugimi izdelki, čeprav se priznava, da ni bilo nobenih dokazov, ki bi potrdili ali ovrgli domnevo, da je v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom dejansko prišlo do navzkrižne kompenzacije.
However, in the review investigation period only 14 invoices for sales to the Union were issued by the exporting producer.
Četrtič, proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je s stvarnega vidika Komisija prejela dokaze, da je bilo vse blago sproščeno v prosti promet na trgu Unije in da so bile protidampinške dajatve plačane ali plačljive.
The very low tonnage represented by these alleged Union sales, as mentioned in recital 29 above, was not contested by the exporting producer.
Po razkritju je proizvajalec izvoznik odgovoril na zahtevo Komisije, da pojasni svoje stališče o tej zadevi v povezavi z izvornimi dokumenti, ki jih ima Komisija na voljo.
Thirdly, the exporting producer claimed, from a factual point of view, that the fact that its export sales to the Union were for specific projects with their own specifications is not relevant and that it had provided positive evidence that no cross-compensation had taken place.
S predloženimi dokumenti se je potrdilo, da so pri transakcijah, ki zadevajo približno polovico obsega prodaje v Unijo, nepojasnjene nepravilnosti v zvezi s plačilom dajatev.
In this respect it should be pointed out that it was stated in the disclosure that the nature of the sales on the Union market meant that there was a risk of cross-compensation with other products, although it is conceded that no evidence was identified to prove or disprove that cross-compensation actually took place during the review investigation period.
Zlasti zaradi transakcij, pri katerih ni bil predložen noben dokaz o plačilu protidampinške dajatve v višini 44 % prodajne cene Unije, te prodajne cene v Uniji očitno niso zanesljive, saj po vsej verjetnosti temeljijo na napačni predpostavki, da protidampinške dajatve niso plačljive.
Bearing in mind that the cross-compensation issue was raised in the disclosure as merely a risk, it was only one of the factors the Commission took into consideration when determining the representativeness of the Union sales (see recital 29).
Petič, družba TK Corporation je trdila, da je bil vmesni pregled uveden glede na dokaze prima facie za izvoz v Unijo, glede na katere je bila stopnja dampinga nižja, zato bi moralo biti mogoče (v okviru dokončne določitve dampinga) stopnjo dampinga izračunati na podlagi prodaje v Uniji.
Fourthly, the exporting producer claimed, from a factual point of view, that the Commission had received evidence that all goods had been released for free circulation on the Union market and that anti-dumping duties were paid or payable.
Ta trditev je bila zavrnjena.
Following the disclosure the exporting producer replied to a request from the Commission to clarify its view on this matter in relation to the source documents available to the Commission.
Prvič, potrebni dokazi za začetek vmesnega pregleda se po naravi bistveno razlikujejo od tistih, na katere se je preiskovalni organ oprl pri svojih končnih ugotovitvah.
The provided documents confirmed that for transactions covering around half of the sales volume to the Union there were unexplained irregularities concerning the payment of duties.
Drugič, preiskava je pokazala, da se ta prodaja ne more veljavno uporabiti zaradi vseh razlogov, obravnavanih v tem oddelku.
In particular, those transactions for which no evidence could be provided as regards the payment of the anti-dumping duty of 44 %, render these Union sales prices clearly unreliable as these sales, in all likelihood, have thus been made on the false assumption that anti-dumping duties are not payable.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da zgolj možnost izračuna stopnje dampinga ne pomeni, da je stopnja dampinga v skladu z ustreznimi določbami osnovne uredbe.
Fifthly, TK Corporation argued that as the interim review was initiated using prima facie evidence concerning export sales to the Union that indicated a lower dumping margin, then it must have been possible (as part of the final determination of dumping) to calculate dumping margin based on Union sales.
Zato se glede na to, da je bila prodaja količin v absolutnem in relativnem smislu tako majhna in da ne obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi za dvom o zanesljivosti velikega deleža te prodaje zaradi razlogov, ki niso v zvezi s količino, zavrne trditev, da Komisija pri določitvi izvoznih cen neupravičeno ni upoštevala izvoza v Unijo.
This claim was rejected.
Nazadnje, analiza in ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (32) in (33), ki jih proizvajalec izvoznik ni izpodbijal, jasno dokazujejo, da je bila izvozna cena skrbno določena in da se ZDA lahko štejejo kot ustrezna osnova za določitev izvoznih cen glede na to, da ni na voljo zanesljivih cen Unije.
First, the evidence required for the initiation of an interim review is by nature substantially different from that on which the investigating authority based its final findings.
Primerjava
Second, the investigation established that those sales could not be validly used for all the reasons discussed in this section.
Komisija je normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno proizvajalca izvoznika primerjala na podlagi franko tovarna.
It is also noted that the mere possibility to calculate a dumping margin does not render the dumping margin compliant with the relevant provisions of the basic Regulation.
Kadar je Komisija to lahko upravičila s potrebo po zagotovitvi poštene primerjave, je v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe normalno vrednost in/ali izvozno ceno prilagodila za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in njihovo primerljivost.