natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p.
V skladu z ugotovitvami druge preiskave proti izogibanju se je uvoz zadevnega izdelka skorajda ustavil po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov iz prvotne preiskave [6] leta 2010.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 of 14 June 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 150, 16.6.2010, p. 17).
V obdobju med letoma 2010 in 2012 ga je nadomestil uvoz izdelka, pri katerem je bilo ugotovljeno izogibanje v drugi preiskavi proti izogibanju.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 14/2012 of 9 January 2012 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of certain molybdenum wires consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not and terminating the investigation in respect of imports consigned from Switzerland (OJ L 8, 12.1.2012, p. 22).
Directorate General for Trade
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 871/2013 of 2 September 2013 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 on imports of molybdenum wire, containing by weight at least 99,95 % of molybdenum, of which the maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeds 1,35 mm but does not exceed 4,0 mm, originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of molybdenum wire, containing by weight at least 97 % of molybdenum, of which the maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeds 1,35 mm but does not exceed 4,0 mm, originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 243, 12.9.2013, p. 2).
Luoyang Hi-tech Metals Co., Ltd, West Lichun Road, Jianxi District, Luoyang, LRK
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/395 of 10 March 2015 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 511/2010 on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People's Republic of China by imports of certain slightly modified molybdenum wires, and making such imports subject to registration (OJ L 66, 11.3.2015, p. 4).
5, 06749 Bitterfeld, Nemčija
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1247/2009 of 17 December 2009 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 336, 18.12.2009, p. 16).
Plansee SE, Metallwerk Plansee Strasse 71, 6600 Reutte, Avstrija
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1953
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1953
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel originating in the People's Republic of China, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the United States of America
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih zrnato usmerjenih ploščato valjanih izdelkov iz silicijevega jekla za elektropločevine s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Japonske, Republike Koreje, Ruske federacije in Združenih držav Amerike
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (‘basic Regulation’) [1], and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti („osnovna uredba“) [1], zlasti člena 9(4) te uredbe,
On 13 May 2015, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel (‘GOES’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’), Japan, the Republic of Korea (‘Korea’), the Russian Federation (‘Russia’) and the United States of America (‘USA’) (together, referred to as ‘the countries concerned’) by Regulation (EU) No 2015/763 (‘the provisional Regulation’) [2].
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 13. maja 2015 na podlagi Uredbe (EU) 2015/763 („začasna uredba“) [2] uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih zrnato usmerjenih ploščato valjanih izdelkov iz silicijevega jekla za elektropločevine („GOES“) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“), Japonske, Republike Koreje („Koreja“), Ruske federacije („Rusija“) in Združenih držav Amerike („ZDA“) (skupaj „zadevne države“).
The proceeding was initiated on 14 August 2014 following a complaint lodged on 30 June 2014 by the European Steel Association (‘Eurofer’ or ‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union producers of GOES.
Postopek se je začel 14. avgusta 2014 na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 30. junija 2014 vložilo Evropsko jeklarsko združenje („EUROFER“ ali „pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % vseh proizvajalcev GOES v Uniji.
As set out in recital (15) of the provisional Regulation the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 (‘the investigation period or IP’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (15) začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode zajemala obdobje od 1. julija 2013 do 30. junija 2014 („obdobje preiskave“).
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which a provisional anti-dumping duty was imposed (‘the provisional disclosure’), several interested parties made written submissions making known their views on the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila uvedena začasna protidampinška dajatev („začasno razkritje“), je več zainteresiranih strani predložilo pisna stališča glede začasnih ugotovitev.
The parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard.
Stranem, ki so zahtevale zaslišanje, je bila ta možnost odobrena.
Hearings with the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings were held with the Japanese exporting producers JFE Steel Corporation and Nippon Steel & Sumitoma Metal Corporation.
Za japonska proizvajalca izvoznika JFE Steel Corporation in Nippon Steel & Sumitoma Metal Corporation so bila organizirana zaslišanja s pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v okviru trgovinskih postopkov.
As set out in recitals (27), (224) and (239) of the provisional Regulation, the Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (27), (224) in (239) začasne uredbe, je Komisija še naprej iskala in preverjala vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele potrebne za dokončne ugotovitve.
Five additional verification visits were carried out after the imposition of the provisional measures at the premises of the following users in the European Union:
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je bilo pet dodatnih preveritvenih obiskov opravljenih v prostorih naslednjih uporabnikov v Evropski uniji:
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, München, Germany
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, München, Nemčija,
ABB AB, Brussels, Belgium
ABB AB, Brussels, Belgija,
Schneider Electric S.A., Metz, France
Schneider Electric S.A., Metz, Francija.
In addition, three verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following Union producers:
Poleg tega so bili trije preveritveni obiski opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih proizvajalcev Unije:
Tata Steel UK Limited (Orb Electrical Steels), Newport, United Kingdom
Tata Steel UK Limited (Orb Electrical Steels), Newport, Združeno kraljestvo.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission intended to impose definitive anti-dumping measures.
Vse strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameravala Komisija uvesti dokončne protidampinške ukrepe.
They were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Odobren jim je bil tudi rok za predložitev stališč po tem razkritju.
A hearing with the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings was held with a user association.
Za združenje uporabnikov je bilo organizirano zaslišanje s pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v okviru trgovinskih postopkov.
The Commission considered the oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties and, where appropriate, modified the findings accordingly.
Komisija je obravnavala ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih poslale zainteresirane strani, ter po potrebi ustrezno spremenila ugotovitve.
As set out in recital (16) of the provisional Regulation, the product concerned is grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel, of a thickness of more than 0,16 mm originating in the PRC, Japan, Korea, Russia and the USA, currently falling within CN codes ex72251100 and ex72261100 (‘the product concerned’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (16) začasne uredbe, so zadevni izdelek zrnato usmerjeni ploščato valjani izdelki iz silicijevega jekla za elektropločevine, debeline več kot 0,16 mm, s poreklom iz LRK, Japonske, Koreje, Rusije in ZDA, ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznaki KN ex72251100 in ex72261100 („zadevni izdelek“).
Some interested parties argued that the product concerned, as set out in recital (16) of the provisional Regulation, and the like product are not alike as stated in recital (22) of the provisional Regulation since they do not share the same physical and chemical characteristics and are not used for the same purposes.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da si zadevni izdelek iz uvodne izjave (16) začasne uredbe in podobni izdelek nista podobna, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (22) začasne uredbe, ker nimata enakih fizikalnih in kemičnih značilnosti ter se ne uporabljata za enake namene.
Three exporting producers, a user association and two individual users claimed that high permeability and/or domain refined types of the product concerned should be excluded from the scope of the investigation since these types are either not produced in sufficient quantities or not produced at all in the Union.
Trije proizvajalci izvozniki, združenje uporabnikov in dva posamezna uporabnika so trdili, da je treba visokoprepustne vrste in/ali domensko dodelane vrste zadevnega izdelka izključiti iz obsega preiskave, saj se te vrste ne proizvajajo v zadostnih količinah ali se v Uniji sploh ne proizvajajo.
One of these exporting producers specified that this should be types of the product concerned with a maximum core loss of 0,90 W/kg and below with a magnetic polarisation of more than 1,88 T. Another exporting producer requested the exclusion of types with a maximum core loss of 0,95 W/kg and below due to the limited competitive overlap with products offered by the Union industry.
Eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov je podrobno navedel, da gre za vrste zadevnega izdelka z največjo izgubo jedra 0,90 W/kg in manj z magnetno polarizacijo več kot 1,88 T. Drugi pa je zahteval, da se zaradi omejenega konkurenčnega prekrivanja z izdelki, ki jih ponuja industrija Unije, izključijo vrste z največjo izgubo jedra 0,95 W/kg in manj.
Some of them also argued that the product types with the lowest core losses have significantly different properties, end-uses, and therefore are not bought by the same customers and do not compete with other types of the product concerned.
Eden od uporabnikov je trdil, da dejstvo, da je Komisija določila ločene minimalne uvozne cene za tri različne kategorije GOES, kaže na pomembnost ločenega obravnavanja različnih kategorij in bi torej utemeljevalo izključitev.
Furthermore, another user argued that two separate injury, causal link and Union interest analyses should be carried out.
Komisija je menila, da je zadevni izdelek, ne glede na njegovo izgubo jedra, raven hrupa in dejstvo, ali je konvencionalen ali visokoprepusten, ploščato valjan izdelek iz legiranega jekla z zrnato usmerjeno strukturo, zaradi katere lahko izdelek prevaja magnetno polje.
Finally, another user asked for the withdrawal of the provisional measures, and, if this would not be possible, that at least the high permeability types (i.e. types with a maximum core loss of 0,90 W/kg and lower) should be excluded from the product scope.
Zaradi usmerjenosti zrn so tehnične in fizikalne značilnosti jekla omejene na edinstven izdelek z izjemno veliko zrnato strukturo.
Following final disclosure, several interested parties reiterated the same request.
Skladno s tem opredelitev izdelka vsebuje dobro opredeljen izdelek.
One user argued that the fact that the Commission established separate minimum import prices for three different categories of GOES showed the relevance of considering the different categories separately and would therefore justify an exclusion.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da imajo vse vrste zadevnega izdelka skupne kemične značilnosti in so namenjene eni glavni uporabi, tj. proizvodnji transformatorjev.
The Commission considered that the product concerned, irrespective of core loss or noise levels, whether conventional or high-permeability products, are flat-rolled alloy steel products having a grain-oriented structure that permits the product to conduct a magnetic field.
Poleg tega je med različnimi vrstami zadevnega izdelka določena stopnja zamenljivosti.
The grain orientation narrows the technical and physical characteristics of the steel to a unique product having an extraordinarily large grain structure.
Glede trditve, da bi bila izključitev utemeljena, ker proizvajalci Unije nekaterih določenih vrst zadevnega izdelka ne proizvajajo v zadostni meri, bi bilo treba najprej opozoriti, da v osnovni uredbi nikjer ni navedena zahteva, da bi morala industrija Unije v komercialnem obsegu proizvajati vse vrste zadevnega izdelka.
Accordingly, the product definition comprises a well-defined product.
Poleg tega je industrija Unije v obdobju preiskave proizvajala več visokoprepustnih vrst izdelkov.
It was also found that all types of the product concerned share common chemistry and have one principal use, i.e. in the production of transformers.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (131) v nadaljevanju, je preverjanje tudi pokazalo, da so proizvajalci Unije vlagali v proizvodnjo visokoprepustnih vrst zadevnega izdelka, zaradi česar bodo lahko povečali proizvodnjo visokoprepustnih GOES.
In addition, there is some degree of interchangeability among the different types of the product concerned.
Poleg tega opredelitev obsega izdelka v preiskavi, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (12), urejajo tehnične značilnosti GOES.
Concerning the argument that exclusion would be justified due to the insufficient production of some particular types of the product concerned by Union producers, it should firstly be recalled that nothing in the basic Regulation requires that all types of the product concerned are produced by the Union industry at commercial scale.
Zahtevana izključitev bi lahko znižala raven zaščite proti nadaljnjemu škodljivemu dampingu v zvezi s posebej visokoprepustnimi vrstami in tako prizadela sedanjo stopnjo proizvodnje s strani industrije Unije.
In addition, several high permeability product types were produced by the Union industry in the IP.
V teh okoliščinah dejstvo, da določenih visokoprepustnih vrst GOES ne proizvaja industrija Unije, ni zadosten razlog, da bi jih izključili iz obsega izdelka.
As mentioned in recital (131) below, the verification also showed that Union producers have been investing in the production of high permeability types of the product concerned which will allow them to increase the production of high permeability GOES.
Glede trditve, da bi ločitev v tri različne kategorije GOES (glej uvodno izjavo (11)) pokazala, da je izključitev utemeljena, je treba opozoriti, da je v preiskavo zajet zadevni izdelek, kot je opredeljen v uvodni izjavi (9), ter da so bile zato izvedene obsežna analiza škode, analiza vzročne zveze in analiza interesa Unije.
Furthermore, as stated in recital (12), the definition of the scope of the product under investigation is governed by the technical characteristics of the GOES.
Dejstvo, da je Komisija priznala, da med različnimi vrstami izdelka obstajajo razlike v kakovosti in da jih je upoštevala pri odločitvi o obliki ukrepov v okviru preverjanja interesa Unije, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (172) v nadaljevanju, ne more biti razlog za spremembo obsega ukrepov.
The requested exclusion could reduce the level of protection against further injurious dumping with regard to the particular high permeability types and thus perpetrate their current production rates by the Union industry.
Zato je Komisija ob upoštevanju navedenega zavrnila zahteve za izključitev teh vrst izdelkov iz obsega izdelka.
In these circumstances, the fact that certain product types of high permeability GOES are not produced by the Union industry is not a sufficient reason to exclude them from the product scope.
Komisija je proučila razlike v kakovosti, pa čeprav le zaradi oblike ukrepa (glej uvodno izjavo (172)).
Concerning the allegation that the separation into three different categories of GOES (see recital (11)) showed that an exclusion is justified, it is recalled that the investigation covers the product concerned as defined in recital (9) and therefore, one comprehensive injury analysis, causation analysis and Union interest analysis was carried out.
Ruski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da na eni strani vrste zadevnega izdelka „prve kategorije“ (večja ploščatost, manj zvarov), ki se izvažajo, ter na drugi strani vrste „druge“ in „tretje kategorije“ (z več pomanjkljivostmi, večjim številom šivov in manjšo ploščatostjo), ki se izvažajo, kot velja v praksi ruske industrije, nikakor niso zamenljive (v nobeno smer) in predstavljajo različne izdelke.
The fact that the Commission acknowledged differences in quality between the different product types and that these differences in quality were taken into account in the decision about the form of the measures in the framework of the Union interest test, as explained below in recital (172), cannot be a reason to change the scope of the measures.
Zato je trdil, da je treba material „druge“ in „tretje kategorije“ izključiti iz obsega izdelka.
In view of the above, the Commission rejected the requests to exclude these product types from the product scope.
Ruski proizvajalec izvoznik je po dokončnem razkritju ponovil svojo trditev in zatrjeval, da se lahko te vrste „druge“ in „tretje kategorije“, ki se izvažajo, v industriji transformatorjev le omejeno uporabljajo, če se nadalje obdelajo v storitvenih centrih za jeklo, in bi jih bilo treba zato izključiti.
The Commission considered the differences in quality, though, for the form of the measure (see recital (172)).
Veljavni opis in oznaka KN zadevnega izdelka bi lahko vključevala različne vrste z vidika kakovosti.
One Russian exporting producer argued that on the one hand their ‘first choice’ exported types of the product concerned (with higher flatness and fewer welding seams) and on the other hand their ‘second’ and ‘third choice’ exported types (with multiple defects, number of stitches and lack of flatness) are, as per the Russian industry practice, not interchangeable to any extent (both ways) and constitute different products.
Vendar je proizvodnja izdelka nižje kakovosti v Uniji in pri proizvajalcih izvoznikih neločljivo povezana s proizvodnim procesom, vrste nižje kakovosti pa so izdelane iz enakega osnovnega materiala in na isti proizvodni opremi.
Therefore, they argued that ‘second’ and ‘third choice’ material be excluded from the product scope.
T. i. vrste „druge“ in „tretje kategorije“, ki se izvažajo, se prav tako prodajajo za uporabo v dejavnostih, ki vključujejo transformatorje, in so v celoti skladne z opredelitvijo zadevnega izdelka.
Following final disclosure, the Russian exporting producer repeated its claim and alleged that these ‘second’ and ‘third choice’ exported types can only be used in the transformer industry in some limited applications if they are further processed in steel service centres and should therefore be excluded.
Dejstvo, da je potrebna nadaljnja obdelava, ni neobičajno in ne more biti razlog za izključitev vrste izdelka.
The current description and the CN code of the product concerned potentially include a wide variety of types from a quality perspective.
Zato je Komisija to zahtevo zavrnila.
However, production of a lower quality product by both the Union and exporting producers is inherent to the production process and lower quality types are made from the same basic material and on the same production equipment.
Komisija je glede na navedeno sklenila, da sta zadevni izdelek, ki ga proizvajajo in prodajajo zadevne države, ter izdelek, ki ga proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije, podobna v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
The so-called ‘second’ and ‘third choice’ exported types are also sold for use in the transformer business, and fully meet the definition of the product concerned.
Uvodne izjave od (16) do (21) začasne uredbe se potrdijo.
The fact that further processing is needed is not unusual and cannot be a reason to exclude a product type.
C. DAMPING
Therefore, the Commission rejected this request.
Splošna metodologija
In view of the above, the Commission concluded that the product concerned produced and sold in the countries concerned and the one produced and sold by the Union industry are alike, within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the Basic Regulation.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb glede splošne metodologije Komisije za izračune dampinga, se uvodne izjave od (33) do (45) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Recitals (16) to (21) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Republika Koreja
C. DUMPING
Normalna vrednost
General methodology
Po začasnem razkritju je edini proizvajalec izvoznik opozoril na to, da bi bilo treba od normalne vrednosti odšteti stroške notranjega prevoza in manipulativne stroške podjetja.
In the absence of any further comments on the Commission's general methodology used for the dumping calculations, recitals (33) to (45) of the Provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba nekoliko prilagoditi stroške preoblikovanja iz celih kolobarjev v razrezane.
Republic of Korea
V skladu s splošno metodologijo, kot je določena v uvodni izjavi (56) začasne uredbe, je bila ta trditev sprejeta, izračuni pa so se ustrezno spremenili.
Normal value
Ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (46) začasne uredbe v zvezi s proizvajalcem izvoznikom se zato spremenijo.
Following provisional disclosure, the sole exporting producer pointed out that the company's inland freight and handling charges should have been deducted from the normal value.
Izvozna cena
Moreover, the conversion cost from full coils to slit coils had to be slightly adjusted.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je s svojimi trgovinskimi družbami in povezanimi družbami v Uniji predstavljal en sam gospodarski subjekt ter da se zato za določitev izvozne cene ne bi smela izvesti prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
In line with the general methodology as set out in recital (56) of the provisional Regulation, this claim was accepted and the calculations were amended accordingly.
Nesporno je, da proizvajalec izvoznik in povezani uvozniki pripadajo isti skupini podjetij.
Consequently, the findings in recital (46) of the Provisional Regulation are amended with regard to the exporting producer.
Zato se šteje, da med njimi obstaja povezava.
Export price
Komisija mora v takih okoliščinah izvozno ceno konstruirati v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
The exporting producer claimed that it formed a single economic entity with its trading companies and its related companies in the Union and that therefore no adjustment under Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation to determine the export price should have been done.
Zato je bila trditev zavrnjena, uvodne izjave od (50) do (54) začasne uredbe pa potrjene.
It is undisputed that the exporting producer and the related importers belong to the same group of companies.
Primerjava