natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Description must be as precise as possible and include a three-letter code in accordance with Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 laying down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein.
V primeru potrdila o glasbilih bi moral opis glasbila pristojnemu organu omogočiti, da preveri, ali se potrdilo ujema z uvoženim ali izvoženim osebkom, opis pa bi moral vključevati elemente, kot so ime proizvajalca, serijska številka ali druga sredstva za identifikacijo, kot so fotografije.“
In the case of a musical instrument certificate, the description of the instrument should allow the competent authority to verify that the certificate corresponds to the specimen being imported or exported, and the description should include elements such as the manufacturer's name, the serial number or other means of identification such as photographs.’
v točki 13 se doda naslednja vrstica:
in point 13, the following row is added:
osebki, vzeti iz morskega okolja, ki ni pod jurisdikcijo nobene države“
Specimens taken in the marine environment not under the jurisdiction of any State’
v točki 14 se vnos „Q cirkusi in potujoče razstave“ nadomesti s „Q potujoče razstave (zbirka vzorcev, cirkus, zverinjak, razstava rastlin, orkester ali muzejska razstava, ki se uporablja za javno prikazovanje v komercialne namene)“.
in point 14, the entry ‘Q Circuses and travelling exhibitions’ is replaced by ‘Q Travelling exhibitions (sample collection, circus, menagerie, plant exhibition, orchestra or museums exhibition that is used for commercial display for the public)’;
del „Navodila in pojasnila“, ki se nanaša na obrazec „2 – Kopija za imetnika“, se spremeni:
the ‘Instructions and explanations’ referring to ‘2 — Copy for the holder’, are amended as follows:
točke 1, 2 in 3 se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
points 1, 2 and 3 are replaced by the following:
Če v primeru potrdila o glasbilih vložnik ni tudi zakoniti lastnik, se na obrazcu navedeta polno ime in naslov tako lastnika kot tudi vložnika, zadevnemu organu izdajatelju potrdila pa se predloži kopija pogodbe o izposoji med lastnikom in vložnikom.
In the case of a musical instrument certificate, if the applicant is different from the legal owner, the full name and address of both the owner and of the applicant should be included in the form and a copy of a loan agreement between owner and applicant should be provided to the relevant permit issuing authority.
del „Navodila in pojasnila“, ki se nanaša na obrazec „3 – Kopija, ki jo carinski urad vrne organu izdajatelju“, se spremeni:
the ‘Instructions and explanations’ referring to ‘3 — Copy for return by customs to the issuing authority’ are amended as follows:
Uvozno dovoljenje ne velja, če je bil ustrezen dokument CITES iz države (ponovnega) izvoza uporabljen za (ponovni) izvoz po zadnjem dnevu veljavnosti ali če je datum vnosa v Unijo več kot šest mesecev po datumu njegove izdaje.
An import permit is not valid where the corresponding CITES document from the (re-)exporting country was used for (re-)export after its last day of validity or if the date of introduction into the Union is more than six months from its date of issue.
del „Navodila in pojasnila“, ki se nanaša na obrazec „5 – Vloga“, se spremeni:
the ‘Instructions and explanations’ referring to ‘5 — Application’, are amended as follows:
točka 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
point 1 is replaced by the following:
Če v primeru potrdila o glasbilih vložnik ni tudi zakoniti lastnik, se na obrazcu navedeta polno ime in naslov tako lastnika kot tudi vložnika, zadevnemu organu izdajatelju potrdila pa se predloži kopija pogodbe o izposoji med lastnikom in vložnikom.“
In the case of a musical instrument certificate, if the applicant is different from the legal owner, the full name and address of both the owner and of the applicant should be included in the form and a copy of a loan agreement between owner and applicant should be provided to the relevant permit issuing authority.’
točka 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
point 3 is replaced by the following:
Opis mora biti čim bolj natančen in mora vsebovati tričrkovno kodo skladno s Prilogo VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 865/2006 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 338/97 o varstvu prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst z zakonsko ureditvijo trgovine z njimi.
Description must be as precise as possible and include a 3-letter code in accordance with Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 laying down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein.
Priloga III se spremeni:
Annex III is amended as follows:
v delu „Navodila in pojasnila“, ki se nanaša na obrazec „Izvirnik“, se v točki 14 doda naslednja vrstica:
in the ‘Instructions and explanations’ referring to ‘Original’, the following row is added to point 14:
v delu „Navodila in pojasnila“, ki se nanaša na obrazec „Vloga“, se v točki 14 doda naslednja vrstica:
in the ‘Instructions and explanations’ referring to ‘Application’, the following row is added to point 14:
v Prilogi IV se naslov zgoraj desno nadomesti z naslednjim:
in Annex IV, the top right heading is replaced by the following:
„POTRDILO O POTUJOČI RAZSTAVI
‘TRAVELLING-EXHIBITION CERTIFICATE
POTRDILO O OSEBNEM LASTNIŠTVU
PERSONAL OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE
POTRDILO O GLASBILIH
MUSICAL INSTRUMENT CERTIFICATE
DOPOLNILNI LIST“
CONTINUATION SHEET’
Priloga V se spremeni:
Annex V is amended as follows:
v delu „Navodila in pojasnila“, ki se nanaša na obrazec „1 – Izvirnik“, se v točki 9 doda naslednja vrstica:
in the ‘Instructions and explanations’ referring to ‘1 — Original’, the following row is added to point 9:
v delu „Navodila in pojasnila“, ki se nanaša na obrazec „3 – Vloga“, se v točki 9 doda naslednja vrstica:
in the ‘Instructions and explanations’ referring to ‘3 — Application’, the following row is added to point 9:
potrdila o glasbilih;“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/58
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/58
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the expiry date of the approval of the active substance tepraloxydim
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 540/2011 glede datuma poteka veljavnosti registracije aktivne snovi tepraloksidim
For the active substance tepraloxydim, Commission Regulation (EU) No 1197/2012 [2] postponed the expiry of the approval period, as set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 [3] to 31 July 2017.
Z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 1197/2012 [2] je bil do 31. julija 2017 odložen iztek obdobja odobritve za aktivno snov tepraloksidim, kot je določeno v Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011 [3].
The sole applicant for the renewal of the approval of the active substance tepraloxydim informed the Commission and the rapporteur Member State of its choice not to further pursue the application for renewal.
Edini vlagatelj vloge za podaljšanje odobritve aktivne snovi tepraloksidim je Komisijo in državo članico poročevalko obvestil, da ne želi več nadaljevati postopka za podaljšanje odobritve.
Therefore it is appropriate to set the expiry date at the original date of expiry as set before the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 1197/2012.
Zato je primerno, da se datum poteka veljavnosti uskladi s prvotnim datumom poteka veljavnosti, določenim pred sprejetjem Uredbe (EU) št. 1197/2012.
In the sixth column, expiration of approval, of entry 100, tepraloxydim, of Part A of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, the date ‘31 July 2017’ is replaced by ‘31 May 2015’.
V delu A Priloge k Izvedbeni Uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011 se v šestem stolpcu vnosa 100 za tepraloksidim datum veljavnosti registracije „31. julij 2017“ nadomesti z „31. maj 2015“.
Done at Brussels, 15 January 2015.
V Bruslju, 15. januarja 2015
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1197/2012 of 13 December 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval periods of the active substances acetamiprid, alpha-cypermethrin, Ampelomyces quisqualis Strain:
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1197/2012 z dne 13. decembra 2012 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 540/2011 glede podaljšanja obdobij odobritve aktivnih snovi acetamiprid, alfa-cipermetrin, Ampelomyces quisqualis sev:
AQ 10, benalaxyl, bifenazate, bromoxynil, chlorpropham, desmedipham, etoxazole, Gliocladium catenulatum Strain:
AQ 10, benalaksil, bifenazat, bromoksinil, klorprofam, desmedifam, etoksazol, Gliocladium catenulatum sev:
MA 342, quinoxyfen, S-metolachlor, tepraloxydim, thiacloprid, thiram and ziram (OJ L 342, 14.12.2012, p. 27).
MA 342, kvinoksifen, S-metolaklor, tepraloksidim, tiakloprid, tiram in ziram (UL L 342, 14.12.2012, str. 27).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/59
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/59
to supplement Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to liquidity coverage requirement for Credit Institutions
o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z zahtevo glede likvidnostnega kritja za kreditne institucije
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 [1], and in particular Article 460 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o bonitetnih zahtevah za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja ter o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 [1] in zlasti člena 460 Uredbe,
During the early ‘liquidity phase’ of the financial crisis that began in 2007, many credit institutions, despite maintaining adequate capital levels, experienced significant difficulties because they had failed to manage their liquidity risk prudently.
V zgodnji „likvidnostni fazi“ finančne krize, ki se je začela leta 2007, so se mnoge kreditne institucije kljub ohranjanju ustrezne ravni kapitala soočale z velikimi težavami, ker niso preudarno upravljale z likvidnostnim tveganjem.
Some credit institutions became overly dependent on short term financing which rapidly dried up at the onset of the crisis.
Nekatere kreditne institucije so postale preveč odvisne od kratkoročnega financiranja, ki je z začetkom krize hitro presahnilo.
Such credit institutions then became vulnerable to liquidity demands because they were not holding a sufficient volume of liquid assets to meet demands to withdraw funds (outflows) during the stressed period.
Take kreditne institucije so postale ranljive na povečane potrebe po likvidnosti, saj niso imele zadostnih likvidnih sredstev, da bi zadostile zahtevam po dvigu finančnih sredstev (odlivih) v stresnem obdobju.
Credit institutions were then forced to liquidate assets in a fire-sale which created a self-reinforcing downward price spiral and lack of market confidence triggering a solvency crisis.
Kreditne institucije so nato morale unovčiti sredstva s hitro razprodajo, ki je ustvarila samospodbujajoče spiralno padanje cen in pomanjkanje tržnega zaupanja, kar je povzročilo krizo v zvezi s kapitalsko ustreznostjo.
Ultimately many credit institutions became excessively dependent on liquidity provision by the central banks and had to be bailed out by the injection of massive amount of funds from the public purse.
Posledično so mnoge kreditne institucije postale preveč odvisne od likvidnosti, ki so jo zagotavljale centralne banke, zato jih je bilo treba rešiti z velikimi finančnimi injekcijami iz javnih sredstev.
Thus it became apparent that it was necessary to develop a detailed liquidity coverage requirement whose aim should be to avoid this risk by making credit institutions less dependent on short-term financing and central bank liquidity provision and more resilient to sudden liquidity shocks.
Tako je postalo očitno, da je treba razviti podrobno zahtevo glede likvidnostnega kritja, katere cilj bi moral biti preprečiti to tveganje tako, da bi kreditne institucije postale manj odvisne od kratkoročnega financiranja in likvidnosti, ki so jo zagotavljale centralne banke, ter bolj odporne na nenadne likvidnostne šoke.
Article 412(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 imposes a liquidity coverage requirement on credit institutions formulated in general terms as an obligation to hold ‘liquid assets, the sum of the values of which covers the liquidity outflows less the liquidity inflows under stressed conditions’.
Člen 412(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 uvaja zahtevo glede likvidnostnega kritja za kreditne institucije, ki je v splošnih pojmih izražena kot obveza, da imajo „likvidna sredstva, katerih vsota vrednosti krije likvidnostne odlive, zmanjšane za likvidnostne prilive v stresnih pogojih“.
Pursuant to Article 460 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, the Commission is empowered to specify in detail that liquidity coverage requirement and the circumstances under which competent authorities have to impose specific in- and outflow levels on credit institutions in order to capture specific risks to which they are exposed.
V skladu s členom 460 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 je Komisija pooblaščena, da natančno določi zahtevo glede likvidnostnega kritja in okoliščine, v katerih morajo pristojni organi določiti specifične stopnje prilivov in odlivov za kreditne institucije, da zajamejo specifična tveganja, ki so jim izpostavljene.
In accordance with Recital 101 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, the rules should be comparable to the liquidity coverage ratio set out in the international framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards and monitoring of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (‘BCBS’), taking into account Union and national specificities.
V skladu z uvodno izjavo 101 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 bi morala biti pravila primerljiva s količnikom likvidnostnega kritja iz dokončnega mednarodnega okvira za merjenje, standarde in spremljanje Baselskega odbora za bančni nadzor (v nadaljnjem besedilu: BCBS) ter obenem upoštevati posebnosti Unije in nacionalne posebnosti.
Until the full implementation of the liquidity coverage requirement from 1 January 2018, Member States should be able to apply a liquidity coverage requirement up to 100 % for credit institutions in accordance with national law.
Do začetka polne uvedbe zahteve glede likvidnostnega kritja od 1. januarja 2018 bi morale imeti države članice možnost v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo uporabljati zahtevo glede likvidnostnega kritja v višini do 100 % za kreditne institucije.
Consistent with BCBS liquidity standards, rules should be adopted to define the liquidity coverage requirement as a ratio of a credit institution's buffer of ‘liquid assets’ to its ‘net liquidity outflows’ over a 30 calendar day stress period.
V skladu s standardi glede likvidnosti BCBS bi bilo treba sprejeti pravila, da se opredeli zahteva glede likvidnostnega kritja kot količnik blažilnika kreditne institucije, ki je sestavljen iz „likvidnih sredstev“, in „neto likvidnostnih odlivov“ v stresnem obdobju, ki traja 30 koledarskih dni.
‘Net liquidity outflows’ should be calculated by deducting the credit institution's liquidity inflows from its liquidity outflows.
„Neto likvidnostni odlivi“ bi se morali izračunati tako, da se likvidnostni prilivi kreditne institucije odštejejo od njenih likvidnostnih odlivov.
The liquidity coverage ratio should be expressed as a percentage and set at a minimum level of 100 %, when fully implemented, which indicates that a credit institution holds sufficient liquid assets to meet its net liquidity outflows during a 30-day stress period.
Količnik likvidnostnega kritja bi bilo treba izraziti kot odstotek in določiti njegovo najmanjšo raven, ki bi ob njegovi polni uvedbi znašala 100 %, kar kaže, da ima kreditna institucija dovolj likvidnih sredstev za kritje svojih neto likvidnostih odlivov v 30-dnevnem stresnem obdobju.
During such a period, a credit institution should be able to convert quickly its liquid assets into cash without recourse to central bank liquidity or public funds, which may result in its liquidity coverage ratio falling temporarily below the 100 % level.
V takem obdobju bi morala biti kreditna institucija sposobna hitro konvertirati svoja likvidna sredstva v denarna sredstva, ne da bi za to uporabila likvidnost centralnih bank ali javna sredstva, zaradi česar bi se lahko njen količnik likvidnostnega kritja začasno zmanjšal pod 100-odstotno raven.
Should that occur or be expected to occur at any time, credit institutions should comply with the specific requirements laid down in Article 414 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 for a timely restoration of their liquidity coverage ratio to the minimum level.
Če bi se to zgodilo ali če se pričakuje, da se bo to kadar koli zgodilo, bi morale kreditne institucije izpolnjevati posebne zahteve iz člena 414 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 za hitro ponovno vzpostavitev njihovega količnika likvidnostnega kritja na minimalno raven.
Only freely transferable assets that can be converted quickly into cash in private markets within a short timeframe and without significant loss in value should be defined as ‘liquid assets’ for the purposes of credit institutions' liquidity buffers.
Za namene likvidnostnih blažilnikov kreditnih institucij bi bilo treba kot „likvidna sredstva“ opredeliti samo prosto prenosljiva sredstva, ki se lahko hitro konvertirajo v denarna sredstva na zasebnih trgih v kratkem časovnem obdobju in brez bistvene izgube vrednosti.
Consistent with Part Six of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and the BCBS classification of liquid assets, appropriate rules should differentiate between assets of extremely high liquidity and credit quality or level 1 assets, and assets of high liquidity and credit quality or level 2 assets.
Skladno z delom 6 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 in razvrstitvijo likvidnih sredstev v skladu z BCBS bi morala ustrezna pravila razlikovati med sredstvi izjemno visoke likvidnosti in kreditne kakovosti oziroma sredstvi stopnje 1 in sredstvi visoke likvidnosti in kreditne kakovosti oziroma sredstvi stopnje 2.
The latter should be further divided into level 2A and 2B assets.
Slednja bi morala biti nadalje razdeljena na sredstva stopnje 2A in sredstva stopnje 2B.
Credit institutions should hold an adequately diversified buffer of liquid assets, having regard to their relative liquidity and credit quality.
Kreditne institucije bi morale imeti blažilnik v obliki ustrezno razpršenih likvidnih sredstev, pri čemer bi se upoštevali njihova relativna likvidnost in kreditna kakovost.
Accordingly, each level and sub-level should be subject to specific requirements on haircuts and limits of the overall buffer and, where appropriate, differentiated requirements should be applied between levels or sub-levels and between categories of liquid assets in the same level or sub-level, which should be more stringent the lower their liquidity classification.
V skladu s tem bi morale za vsako stopnjo in podstopnjo veljati posebne zahteve glede odbitkov in limitov splošnega blažilnika, po potrebi pa bi se morale uporabljati različne zahteve glede na stopnje ali podstopnje ter kategorije likvidnih sredstev iste stopnje ali podstopnje, njihova strogost pa bi morala naraščati z upadanjem razvrstitve v zvezi z likvidnostjo.
Certain general and operational requirements should be applied to liquid assets to ensure they can be converted into cash within a short timeframe, subject to some exceptions for specified level 1 assets where appropriate.
Za likvidna sredstva bi se morale uporabljati nekatere splošne in operativne zahteve za zagotovitev, da se lahko v kratkem časovnem obdobju konvertirajo v denarna sredstva, pri čemer bi po potrebi veljale nekatere izjeme za določena sredstva stopnje 1.
These requirements should specify that liquid assets should be held free from any obstacle preventing their disposal, easy to value and listed on recognised exchanges or tradable on active sale or repurchase markets.
Te zahteve bi morale določati, da za likvidna sredstva ne bi smelo biti ovir, ki bi preprečevale njihovo odtujitev, njihovo vrednotenje bi moralo potekati brez težav in kotirati bi morala na priznanih borzah oziroma bi morala biti predmet trgovanja na aktivnih prodajnih trgih ali trgih repo poslov.
They should also ensure that the credit institution's liquidity management function has access to and control of its liquid assets at all times and that the assets comprising the liquidity buffer are appropriately diversified.
Morale bi tudi zagotavljati, da ima služba za upravljanje z likvidnostjo kreditne institucije stalen dostop do njenih likvidnih sredstev in nadzor nad njimi ter da so sredstva, ki sestavljajo likvidnostni blažilnik, ustrezno razpršena.
Diversification is important to ensure that a credit institution's ability to rapidly liquidate liquid assets without a significant loss in value is not compromised by those assets being vulnerable to a common risk factor.
Razpršenost je pomembna za zagotavljanje, da sredstva, ki so ranljiva na skupni dejavnik tveganja, ne ogrozijo zmožnosti kreditne institucije, da hitro unovči likvidna sredstva brez pomembne izgube vrednosti.
Credit institutions should also be required to ensure consistency of the currency denomination of their liquid assets and their net liquidity outflows, to prevent an excessive currency mismatch from compromising their ability to use their liquidity buffer to meet liquidity outflows in a specific currency in a stress period.
Kreditne institucije bi morale tudi zagotoviti usklajenost valutne denominacije svojih likvidnih sredstev in neto likvidnostnih odlivov, da preprečijo, da bi presežna valutna neusklajenost ogrozila njihovo zmožnost uporabe likvidnostnega blažilnika za kritje likvidnostnih odlivov v določeni valuti v stresnem obdobju.
In accordance with the recommendations made by the European Banking Authority (EBA) in its report of 20 December 2013, prepared pursuant to Article 509(3) and (5) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, all types of bonds issued or guaranteed by Member States' central governments and central banks as well as those issued or guaranteed by supranational institutions should be given level 1 status.
V skladu s priporočili iz poročila Evropskega bančnega organa (EBA) z dne 20. decembra 2013, ki je bilo pripravljeno v skladu s členom 509(3) in (5) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, bi moral biti status stopnje 1 dodeljen vsem vrstam obveznic, ki jih izdajo ali za katere jamčijo enote centralne ravni držav članic in centralne banke, ter obveznicam, ki jih izdajo ali za katere jamčijo nadnacionalne institucije.
As the EBA noted, there are strong supervisory arguments for not discriminating between various Member States because the exclusion of some sovereign bonds from level 1 would create incentives to invest in other sovereign bonds within the Union, which would result in the fragmentation of the internal market and increase the risk of mutual contagion in a crisis between credit institutions and their sovereigns (the ‘bank-sovereign nexus’).
Kot je navedla EBA, obstajajo trdni argumenti nadzornih organov proti diskriminaciji med različnimi državami članicami, saj bi izključitev nekaterih državnih obveznic iz stopnje 1 ustvarila spodbude za naložbe v druge državne obveznice v Uniji, kar bi povzročilo razdrobljenost notranjega trga in povečalo tveganje medsebojnega širjenja negativnih vplivov v krizi med kreditnimi institucijami in njihovimi državami („vzajemna povezanost bank in držav“).
As regards third countries, level 1 status should be given to exposures to central banks and sovereigns which are assigned a 0 % risk weight under the credit risk rules in Title II of Part 3 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, as is provided for in the BCBS standard.
V zvezi s tretjimi državami bi bilo treba status stopnje 1 dodeliti izpostavljenostim do centralnih bank in držav, katerim se dodeli 0-odstotna utež tveganja v skladu s pravili o kreditnem tveganju iz naslova II dela 3 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, kot je določeno v standardu BCBS.