natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, the transaction records inspected on spot revealed that one customer had not paid the entire amount for the sales transaction in question.
Zaveza določa, da kršitev s strani posameznega proizvajalca izvoznika ne privede samodejno do umika sprejetja zaveze za vse proizvajalce izvoznike.
Further analysis established that this partial payment lead to sales price below the MIP.
V takem primeru Komisija oceni vpliv te kršitve na izvedljivost zaveze z učinkom za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
Selling at a price below the MIP constitutes a breach of the undertaking.
Komisija je ustrezno ocenila vpliv kršitev s strani družb Chint Solar in Sunny Energy na izvedljivost zaveze z učinkom za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
Conclusions
Odgovornost za kršitve se pripiše samo zadevnima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma.
The findings of breaches of the undertaking and its impracticability established for Chint Solar and Sunny Energy justify the withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for these two exporting producers pursuant to Articles 8(7) and 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, Articles 13(7) and 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, and pursuant to the terms of the undertaking.
S spremljanjem niso bile razkrite nobene sistematične kršitve s strani velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali CCCME.
F. ASSESSMENT OF PRACTICABILITY OF THE OVERALL UNDERTAKING
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da delovanje v skladu z zavezo na splošno ni ogroženo in da ni razlogov za umik sprejetja zaveze za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
The undertaking stipulates that a breach by an individual exporting producer does not automatically lead to the withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers.
G. PISNA STALIŠČA IN ZASLIŠANJA
In such a case, the Commission shall assess the impact of that particular breach on the practicability of the undertaking with the effect for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
Zainteresirane strani so imele priložnost, da izrazijo svoja stališča in predložijo pripombe v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
The Commission has accordingly assessed the impact of the breaches by Chint Solar and Sunny Energy on the practicability of the undertaking with the effect for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
Družbi Chint Solar in Sunny Energy sta predložili pripombe in bili zaslišani.
The responsibility for the breaches lies alone with the exporting producers in question; the monitoring has not revealed any systematic breaches by a major number of exporting producers or the CCCME.
Pripombe je predložila še ena od zainteresiranih strani.
The Commission therefore concludes that the overall functioning of the undertaking is not affected and that there are no grounds for withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
Na zaslišanjih sta družbi Chint Solar in Sunny Energy potrdili, da je do določenih kršitev prišlo, vendar sta se zavezali, da bosta v prihodnje zavezo spoštovali, ter poudarili, da se jima kršitve zdijo zanemarljive.
G. WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS AND HEARINGS
Prodaja modulov, ki jih je proizvedla povezana družba, ki ni predložila zaveze, v Unijo
Interested parties were granted the opportunity to be heard and to comment under Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Družba Chint Solar je trdila, da kljub odgovorom, ki jih je v okviru prvotne preiskave predložil povezani proizvajalec iz uvodne izjave 18, Komisija navedenega proizvajalca ni vključila niti v predlog za vzorčenje proizvajalcev niti na seznam sodelujočih proizvajalcev, za katere veljajo dokončne ugotovitve prvotne preiskave.
Both Chint Solar and Sunny Energy submitted comments and have been heard.
Po njihovem mnenju družba Chint Solar zaradi teh opustitev ni mogla razumeti različnih statusov njenih proizvajalcev.
Another interested party also submitted comments.
Komisija zavrača ta argument.
During the hearings, both Chint Solar and Sunny Energy confirmed that certain breaches had occurred, but committed to respect the undertaking in the future and stressed that they considered the breaches as minor.
Prvič, predlog za vzorčenje se je nanašal tako na posamezne proizvajalce kot na skupine družb.
Sales of modules to the Union manufactured by a related company not party to the undertaking
Iz besedila in seznama družb, ki je priložen predlogu za vzorčenje, jasno izhaja, da je na eno skupino družb navedena ena družba.
Chint Solar claimed that despite the replies submitted during the original investigation by the related producer referred to in recital 18 above, the Commission neither included this producer in the sampling proposal nor in the list of cooperating producers subject to the final determination of the original investigation.
Dejansko je imela večina družb, predlaganih za vzorčenje, več povezanih družb v LRK, v predlogu za vzorčenje pa je bila navedena le ena družba na skupino družb.
In their view, due to these omissions, Chint Solar was not in a position to understand the different statuses of its producers.
Drugič, v nasprotju s predlogom za vzorčenje, seznam sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, naveden v izvedbenih uredbah, ki uvajajo začasne in dokončne protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve za zadevni izdelek, vsebuje vse družbe znotraj skupin družb.
The Commission rejects this argument.
Komisija meni, da je imela družba Chint Solar po razkritjih v začasni in končni fazi prvotnih preiskav dovolj časa, da opozori na netočnosti na seznamu sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
First, the sampling proposal referred to both individual producers and company groups.
Družba Chint Solar ni predložila nobene pripombe.
It is clear from the wording and the list of companies attached to the sampling proposal that one company per company group was listed.
Obveznosti poročanja povezanih uvoznikov v Uniji
In fact, most of the companies proposed for sampling had several related companies in the PRC but only one company per company group was listed in the sampling proposal.
Družba Chint Solar je trdila tudi, da ni vedela za obveznost poročanja o svojih povezanih družbah v Uniji, navedeno v uvodni izjavi 5(a), saj družba Chint Solar ni bila uradno obveščena o sprejetju zaveze, ponujene s strani teh povezanih družb.
Second, contrary to the sampling proposal, the list of cooperating exporting producers referred to in the Implementing Regulations imposing provisional and definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties on the product concerned contains all companies within the company group.
Poleg tega je trdila tudi, da tem povezanim družbam v Uniji ni bil zagotovljen neodvisen dostop do sistema poročanja, s čimer je postala predložitev njihovih četrtletnih poročil neizvedljiva.
The Commission considers that Chint Solar was granted sufficient time to point out any inaccuracy in the list of cooperating exporting producers following the disclosures at the provisional and the final stages of the original investigations.
Komisija te trditve zavrača.
No comment was received from Chint Solar.
Družba Chint Solar je bila dolžna poročati o transakcijah pri nadaljnji prodaji neodvisnim strankam v Uniji, vendar tega ni storila iz naslednjih razlogov:
Reporting obligations by the related importers in the Union
Ponujena zaveza ene od povezanih družb v Uniji, navedene v uvodni izjavi 5(a), je bila sprejeta že ob uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve [12].
Chint Solar also claimed that it had not been aware of the reporting obligations on its related companies in the Union referred to in recital 5(a) above, as Chint Solar was not notified about the acceptance of the undertaking offered by these related companies.
Določbe zaveze jasno določajo, da mora družba poročati o nadaljnji prodaji neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
In addition, Chint Solar argued that no independent access to the reporting system was provided to these related companies in the Union which rendered the submission of their quarterly reports impracticable.
Ponujena zaveza druge povezane družbe v Uniji, navedene v uvodni izjavi 5(a), je bila sprejeta za obdobje uporabe dokončnih ukrepov [13].
The Commission rejects these arguments as Chint Solar was obliged to report the resale transactions to independent customers in the Union and failed to do so.
Vendar po sprejetju zaveze ni prišlo do prodaje tej povezani družbi.
This is for the following reasons:
Zato trditve družbe Chint Solar v zvezi s to družbo niso relevantne.
the undertaking offer including one of the related companies in the Union referred to in recital 5(a) above was already accepted with the provisional anti-dumping duty [12].
CCCME koordinira vlaganje vseh četrtletnih poročil družb, ki so predmet zaveze, vključno s četrtletnimi poročili o nadaljnji prodaji.
The provisions of the undertaking text clearly stipulate that resales to independent customers in the Union have to be reported,
Družba Chint Solar bi lahko tako pridobila nadaljnje informacije o svojih obveznostih poročanja na podlagi zaveze.
the undertaking offer including the other related company in the Union referred to in recital 5(a) above was accepted for the period of application of definitive measures [13].
Družba Chint Solar je predložila nepopolno četrtletno poročilo na začetku preveritvenega obiska.
However, no sales took place to this related company following the acceptance of the undertaking.
To potrjuje, da se je družba Chint Solar zavedala obveznosti poročanja njenih povezanih družb v Uniji.
Therefore, Chint Solar's arguments are irrelevant regarding this company,
Brez bistvene kršitve
the CCCME coordinates the submission of all quarterly reports by the companies subject to the undertaking, including the quarterly reports on resale transactions.
Družba Chint Solar je trdila tudi, da ni prišlo do bistvene kršitve, saj so bile nesporočene transakcije zanemarljive v primerjavi s celotnim številom prodajnih transakcij.
Chint Solar was in a position to obtain any further information on their reporting obligations under the undertaking,
Komisija te trditve ne more sprejeti.
Chint Solar submitted an incomplete quarterly report at the beginning of the verification visit.
Družba Chint Solar ni predložila nobenega četrtletnega poročila o transakcijah nadaljnje prodaje njenih povezanih družb iz uvodne izjave 5(a) od začetka veljavnosti zaveze.
This substantiates that Chint Solar was aware of the reporting obligations of its related companies in the Union.
To velja ne glede na število nesporočenih transakcij.
No substantial breach
Komisija zato potrjuje svojo ugotovitev, da je družba Chint Solar kršila svojo obveznost poročanja na podlagi zaveze.
Chint Solar also claimed that no substantial breach occurred as the non-reported transactions were marginal compared to the total number of sales transactions.
Prodaja povezanega proizvajalca v Uniji
The Commission cannot accept this argument.
Družba Chint Solar je prav tako nasprotovala trditvi, da je kršila obveznost iz zaveze, tj. da ne bo sklenila kompenzacijskega dogovora, kar je utemeljila z:
Chint Solar has not submitted any quarterly report on the resale transactions of its related company referred to in recital 5(a) since the entry into force of the undertaking.
Družba Chint Solar je uradno obvestila Komisijo o prevzemu proizvajalca modulov iz Unije iz uvodne izjave 19, na kar se Komisija ni odzvala.
This is irrespective of the number of non-reported transactions.
Zaradi splošne kompleksnosti zaveze je Komisija sčasoma za isti scenarij dajala različne odgovore.
Therefore, the Commission upholds its conclusion that Chint Solar breached their reporting obligation under the undertaking.
Zato je razumljivo, da družba Chint Solar ni preučila tveganja kompenzacijskih dogovorov do razkritja o nameri Komisije, da umakne sprejetje zaveze.
Sales by the related producer in the Union
Za prodajo povezanega proizvajalca v Uniji ne bi smeli veljati pogoji iz zaveze, saj ta zajema le module in celice s poreklom ali poslane iz LRK.
Chint Solar also contested that it had breached the obligation under the undertaking not to enter into a compensatory arrangement for the following reasons:
Družba Chint Solar ni imela namena izvajati kakršne koli navzkrižne kompenzacije s prodajo izdelka, tako iz LRK kot s strani povezanega proizvajalca v Uniji, isti stranki družbe Chint Solar.
Chint Solar notified the Commission on the acquisition of the module producer in the Union referred to in recital 19 above and the Commission has not reacted,
Te vzporedne prodaje upravičuje razlika v specifikacijah izdelka in trgovinskih navadah zadevne stranke družbe Chint Solar.
the complexity of the undertaking in general led the Commission to issue different replies for the same scenario over the time.
Družba Chint Solar je prav tako trdila, da je bila prodajna cena povezanega proizvajalca v Uniji v skladu s tržno ceno.
Therefore, it is reasonable that Chint Solar did not consider the risk of compensatory arrangements until the disclosure on the intention to withdraw the undertaking by the Commission,
Poleg tega se je družba Chint Solar zavezala, da bo prenehala s prodajo zadevnega izdelka stranki iz LRK, zagotavljala četrtletna poročila o prodaji njenega povezanega proizvajalca v Uniji in omogočila preverjanje točnosti teh poročil.
the sales of the related producer in the Union should not be subject to the terms of the undertaking which only covers modules and cells originating in or consigned from the PRC,
Komisija teh trditev ne more sprejeti.
Chint Solar had no intention for any cross-compensation by selling to the same Chint Solar customer from PRC and the related producer in the Union.
Prvič, Komisija družbe Chint Solar ni kritizirala, ker ta ni priglasila prevzema, vendar zaradi vzporedne prodaje, opisane v uvodni izjavi 19.
The difference in the product specifications and the trading habit of the particular Chint Solar customer justifies these parallel sales.
Drugič, družba Chint Solar navaja odgovore služb Komisije, ki so nezavezujoči, zunaj konteksta.
Chint Solar also claimed that the sales price of the related producer in the Union was in line with the market price.
Navedeni odgovori niso povezani z zavezo, da družba ne bo sklenila kompenzacijskega dogovora.
In addition, Chint Solar committed to stop selling the product concerned to that Chint Solar customer from the PRC, to provide quarterly reports on the sales of its related producer in the Union and to allow for verifying the accuracy of these reports.
Tretjič, jasno je, da prodaja proizvajalca Unije ne more biti predmet zaveze.
The Commission cannot accept these arguments.
Vendar se kompenzacijski dogovori, ki jih je odkrila Komisija, nanašajo na vzporedno prodajo tega povezanega proizvajalca Unije stranki družbe Chint Solar ali stranki, povezani s stranko družbe Chint Solar.
First, the Commission did not criticise Chint Solar for not notifying the acquisition, but for the parallel sales described in recital 19 above.
Razlika v specifikacijah izdelka z vidika navzkrižne kompenzacije ni relevantna.
Second, Chint Solar quotes the replies of the Commission services, which in any event have been qualified as non-binding, out of context.
Poleg tega je nepomembno, ali je bila prodaja opravljena po tržnih cenah, saj so bile te cene nižje od MIP.
The replies referred to are irrelevant to the obligation not to enter into a compensatory arrangement.
Komisija je analizirala tudi dodatne zaveze družbe Chint Solar in ugotovila, da se te nanašajo samo na nevarnost kompenzacijskih dogovorov v zvezi z eno določeno stranko.
Third, it is clear that the sales of a Union producer cannot be subject to the undertaking.
Poleg tega predstavljajo dodatno breme pri spremljanju zaveze, in sicer zaradi dodatnega preverjanja dodatnih četrtletnih poročil.
However, the compensatory arrangements found by the Commission occurred due to the parallel sales by this related Union producer to a Chint Solar customer or to customers related to a Chint Solar customer.
Komisija zato potrjuje svojo oceno, da je družba Chint Solar kršila svojo zavezo, da ne bo sklepala kompenzacijskih dogovorov.
The difference in product specifications is irrelevant from the cross-compensation point of view.
Prodaja proizvajalcem originalne opreme („OEM“)
In addition, it is also irrelevant if sales were made at market prices as these prices were below the MIP.
Družba Chint Solar je tudi navedla, da ni prodala modulov stranki OEM iz uvodne izjave 20 v kraje namembnosti zunaj Unije.
The Commission also analysed the additional commitments made by Chint Solar and concluded that they only address the risk of compensatory arrangements in relation to one particular customer.
Poleg tega je družba Chint Solar zatrdila, da je Komisiji zagotovila vse informacije v zvezi s pogodbenim dogovorom z določenim OEM.
In addition, they pose an additional burden on the monitoring of the undertaking, namely further checks of extra quarterly reports.
Družba Chint Solar je tudi pojasnila, da je v enem primeru zaradi posebnih okoliščin nenamerno izdelek dostavila članom druge skupine strank OEM v Uniji in zunaj nje, navedene v uvodni izjavi 20.
Therefore, the Commission upholds its assessment that Chint Solar breached its obligation under the undertaking not to enter into a compensatory arrangement.
Družba Chint Solar se je zavezala, da se v prihodnosti taka napaka ne bo več ponovila.
OEM sales
Komisija te trditve zavrača.
Chint Solar also submitted that it did not sell any modules to non-Union destinations of the OEM customer referred to in recital 20 above.
Prvič, Komisija meni, da obstoj takega poslovnega modela povzroča tveganje izogibanja MIP v obliki navzkrižne kompenzacije.
In addition, Chint Solar reiterated that they provided all information concerning the particular OEM contractual arrangement to the Commission.
Do prodaje sicer ni prišlo, vendar to ne ublaži ugotovljenega tveganja navzkrižne kompenzacije.
Chint Solar also clarified that it accidentally delivered in one instance to Union and non-Union members of the other OEM customer group referred to in recital 20 under special circumstances.
Poleg tega družba Chint Solar ni predložila nobenih podrobnosti o tem, kako zagotoviti, da do take nenamerne prodaje ne bo prišlo v prihodnosti.
Chint Solar also offered commitments that no similar accidents will occur in the future.
Nediskriminatorna obravnava in spremembe na trgu sončne energije Unije
The Commission rejects these arguments.
Družba Chint Solar je tudi navedla, da bi se ji morala v obdobju izvajanja zaveze zagotoviti pravočasna navodila in enake možnosti za popravke.
First, the Commission considers that the existence of such a business model leads to a risk of circumvention in the form of cross-compensation of the MIP.
Po njihovem vedenju je Komisija ugotovila tudi primere neporočanja in drugih kršitev pri drugih družbah, ki so predmet zaveze, ki pa niso privedli do umika zaveze.
The fact that no sales took place does not alleviate the identified risk of cross-compensation.
Komisija to trditev zavrača, saj za nobeno drugo družbo ni bilo ugotovljeno, da krši zavezo iz istih razlogov kot družba Chint Solar.
In addition, Chint Solar did not provide any detail on how to ensure that no such accidental sales will occur in the future.
Komisija zato te trditve družbe Chint Solar zavrača kot neutemeljene.
Non-discriminatory treatment and changes in the Union solar market
Družba Chint Solar je trdila tudi, da bi morala Komisija pri odločanju o umiku zaveze za družbo Chint Solar oceniti tudi spremembe na trgu sončne energije Unije, zlasti domnevni negativni vpliv protidampinških in izravnalnih ukrepov v sektorju sončne energije Unije.
Chint Solar also submitted that it shall be granted timely instructions and equal opportunity to make corrections during the implementation of the undertaking.
Komisija to trditev zavrača, saj za presojo kršitev zaveze s strani družbe Chint Solar ni relevantna.
To their knowledge, the Commission has found issues of non-reporting and other breaches by other companies subject to the undertaking which was not followed by withdrawal from the undertaking.
Neporočanje
The Commission rejects this argument as no other company was found to breach the undertaking for the same reasons as Chint Solar.
Družba Sunny Energy je izpodbijala trditev, da je kršila obveznost poročanja, saj je bilo vsaj o določeni prodaji „drugih izdelkov“ poročano Komisiji v enem od četrtletnih poročil, pripravljeno pa je bilo vsaj še eno poročilo, ki ni bilo predloženo Komisiji.
The Commission therefore dismisses these allegations of Chint Solar as unsubstantiated.
Družba Sunny Energy je predložila četrtletno poročilo o„drugih izdelkih“ v prvem četrtletju po začetku veljavnosti zaveze.
Chint Solar also submitted that the Commission shall evaluate the changes on the Union solar market, in particular the alleged negative impact of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures on the Union solar sector in deciding on the withdrawal of the undertaking from Chint Solar.
Vendar družba Sunny Energy ni predložila nadaljnjih četrtletnih poročil o „drugih izdelkih“ niti ni manjkajočih poročil o transakcijah nadoknadila v naslednjih četrtletnih poročilih.
The Commission rejects this argument as it is irrelevant to the assessment of the breaches of the undertaking by Chint Solar.
Omejitev prodaje
Non-reporting
Družba Sunny Energy je trdila tudi, da v večini primerov ni prišlo do bistvene kršitve zaveze in da je prodajna vrednost „drugih izdelkov“ omejitve vzporedne prodaje prekoračila za marginalen znesek.
Sunny Energy contested that it breached their reporting obligation since at least some sales of ‘other products’ were reported to the Commission in one of the quarterly reports and at least another report was prepared without submission to the Commission.
Pri prekoračitvi omejitve vzporedne prodaje vrednost prekoračitve ne igra nobene vloge, tudi če je ta zanemarljiva.
Sunny Energy did submit the quarterly report of ‘other products’ in the first quarter following the entry into force of the undertaking.
Komisija zato potrjuje svojo ugotovitev, da je družba Sunny Energy kršila svojo obveznost poročanja na podlagi zaveze.
However, Sunny Energy failed to submit further quarterly reports of ‘other products’ or to rectify the omitted transactions in the subsequent quarterly reports.
Sistem dvojnega zaračunavanja
Sales limit
Družba Sunny Energy je trdila, da so vrednosti na računu na podlagi zaveze, izstavljenem strankam družbe Sunny Energy, točne in da se uporabljajo za knjiženje transakcij družbe Sunny Energy.
Sunny Energy also claimed that no substantive breach of the undertaking occurred in most cases and the sales value of the ‘other products’ exceeded the parallel sales limit by a marginal amount.
Plačilo za dano transakcijo prav tako temelji na računu na podlagi zaveze.
The excess of the parallel sales limit is irrespective of the amount in question, even if it is marginal.
Po njihovem mnenju je za doseganje skladnosti s pogoji zaveze pomembna le skupna vrednost računa z obračunanim DDV, in ne sama razčlenitev skupne vrednosti.
Therefore, the Commission upholds its conclusion that Sunny Energy breached their reporting obligation under the undertaking.
Zato so bile temeljne finančne transakcije v skladu z njihovo nominalno vrednostjo.
Double invoicing system
Poleg tega so razlike v vrednostih na računih na podlagi zaveze in računih z obračunanim DDV zanemarljive.
Sunny Energy submitted that the values of the undertaking invoice supplied to Sunny Energy's customers are accurate and are used to book the transactions in Sunny Energy's accounts.
Prvič, račun z obračunanim DDV vključuje ceno zadevnega izdelka in nesporočenih „drugih izdelkov“, za katere se je prodajna cena razlikovala od cen, navedenih na računu na podlagi zaveze.
The payment for a given transaction is also based on the undertaking invoice.
Drugič, družba Sunny Energy ni predložila nobenega prepričljivega argumenta za razliko med različnimi finančnimi in upravnimi dokumenti.
In their view, only the total value of the VAT invoice is relevant for the compliance with the terms of the undertaking, not the breakdown of how that total was arrived at.
Delno plačilo