natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This would be the case where the lawyer in the executing Member State cannot fulfil his or her tasks as regards the execution of a European arrest warrant effectively and efficiently without the assistance of a lawyer in the issuing Member State.
To bi veljalo v primerih, ko odvetnik v izvršitveni državi članici brez pomoči odvetnika v odreditveni državi članici ne bi mogel uspešno in učinkovito izpolniti svojih nalog, kar zadeva izvršitev evropskega naloga za prijetje.
Any decision regarding the granting of legal aid in the issuing Member State should be taken by an authority that is competent for taking such decisions in that Member State, on the basis of criteria that are established by that Member State when implementing this Directive.
Vsakršno odločitev v zvezi z dodelitvijo brezplačne pravne pomoči v odreditveni državi članici bi moral sprejeti organ, ki je pristojen za sprejemanje takih odločitev v tej državi članici, in sicer na podlagi meril, ki jih določi zadevna država članica pri izvajanju te direktive v nacionalno pravo.
To ensure effective access to a lawyer by requested persons, Member States should ensure that requested persons have a right to legal aid until they are surrendered, or until the decision not to surrender them becomes final.
Države članice bi morale za zagotovitev učinkovitega dostopa zahtevanih oseb do odvetnika zagotoviti, da imajo zahtevane osebe pravico do brezplačne pravne pomoči do njihove predaje oziroma dokler odločitev, da se jih ne preda, ne postane pravnomočna.
When implementing this Directive, Member States should ensure respect for the fundamental right to legal aid as provided for by the Charter and by the ECHR.
Države članice bi morale pri izvajanju te direktive zagotoviti spoštovanje temeljne pravice do brezplačne pravne pomoči, kakor je določena v Listini in EKČP.
In doing so, they should respect the United Nations Principles and Guidelines on Access to Legal Aid in Criminal Justice Systems.
Pri tem bi morale upoštevati načela in smernice Združenih narodov o dostopu do brezplačne pravne pomoči v kazenskopravnih sistemih.
Without prejudice to provisions of national law concerning the mandatory presence of a lawyer, a competent authority should decide, without undue delay, whether or not to grant legal aid.
Brez poseganja v določbe nacionalnega prava o obvezni navzočnosti odvetnika bi moral pristojni organ brez nepotrebnega odlašanja odločiti, ali se brezplačna pravna pomoč dodeli ali ne.
The competent authority should be an independent authority that is competent to take decisions regarding the granting of legal aid, or a court, including a judge sitting alone.
Pristojni organ bi moral biti neodvisni organ, pristojen za sprejemanje odločitev v zvezi z dodelitvijo brezplačne pravne pomoči, ali sodišče, vključno s sodnikom posameznikom.
In urgent situations the temporary involvement of the police and the prosecution should, however, also be possible in so far as this is necessary for granting legal aid in a timely manner.
Vendar bi bilo treba v nujnih primerih omogočiti tudi začasno vključitev policije in tožilstva, v kolikor bi bilo to potrebno, da se brezplačna pravna pomoč dodeli pravočasno.
Where legal aid has been granted to a suspect, an accused person or a requested person, one way of ensuring its effectiveness and quality is to facilitate continuity in his or her legal representation.
Če se osumljeni, obdolženi ali zahtevani osebi dodeli brezplačna pravna pomoč, je eden od načinov za zagotavljanje njene učinkovitosti in kakovosti olajšanje kontinuitete pravnega zastopanja te osebe.
In that respect, Member States should facilitate continuity of legal representation throughout the criminal proceedings, as well as — where relevant — in European arrest warrant proceedings.
V zvezi s tem bi morale države članice olajšati kontinuiteto pravnega zastopanja ves čas trajanja kazenskega postopka, ter – kadar je primerno – v postopku na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje.
Adequate training should be provided to staff involved in the decision-making on legal aid in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings.
Osebju, ki je vključeno v sprejemanje odločitev o brezplačni pravni pomoči v kazenskem postopku in postopku na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje, bi bilo treba zagotoviti ustrezno usposabljanje.
Without prejudice to the judicial independence and differences in the organisation of the judiciary across the Member States, Member States should request that those responsible for the training of judges provide such training to courts and judges that take decisions regarding the granting of legal aid.
Brez poseganja v neodvisnost in različno organizacijo sodstva v državah članicah bi te morale zahtevati, da pristojni za usposabljanje sodnikov zagotovijo takšno usposabljanje sodiščem in sodnikom, ki sprejemajo odločitve v zvezi z dodelitvijo brezplačne pravne pomoči.
The principle of effectiveness of Union law requires that Member States put in place adequate and effective remedies in the event of a breach of a right conferred upon individuals by Union law.
Načelo učinkovitosti prava Unije zahteva, da države članice uvedejo ustrezna in učinkovita pravna sredstva v primeru kršitve pravice, ki je posameznikom zagotovljena s pravom Unije.
An effective remedy should be available where the right to legal aid is undermined or the provision of legal aid is delayed or refused in full or in part.
V primeru, da je pravica do brezplačne pravne pomoči okrnjena ali da je zagotovitev brezplačne pravne pomoči prepozna ali v celoti ali delno zavrnjena, bi moralo biti na voljo učinkovito pravno sredstvo.
In order to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of this Directive, there is a need for collection of relevant data, from available data, with regard to the implementation of the rights set out in this Directive.
Za spremljanje in ocenjevanje učinkovitosti te direktive je treba iz razpoložljivih podatkov zbirati ustrezne podatke o izvajanju pravic iz te direktive.
Such data include, where possible, the number of requests for legal aid in criminal proceedings, as well as in European arrest warrant proceedings where the Member State concerned acts as an issuing or executing Member State, the number of cases where legal aid was granted, and the number of cases where a request for legal aid was refused.
Takšni podatki po možnosti vključujejo število prošenj za brezplačno pravno pomoč v kazenskih postopkih ter v postopkih na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje, kadar zadevna država članica deluje kot izvršitvena ali odreditvena država članica, število primerov, v katerih je bila brezplačna pravna pomoč dodeljena, in število primerov, v katerih so bile prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč zavrnjene.
Data on the costs of providing legal aid to suspects or accused persons and to requested persons should also be collected in so far as possible.
Prav tako bi bilo treba po možnosti zbirati podatke o stroških zagotavljanja brezplačne pravne pomoči osumljenim ali obdolženim osebam in zahtevanim osebam.
This Directive should apply to suspects, accused persons and requested persons regardless of their legal status, citizenship or nationality.
To direktivo bi bilo treba uporabljati za osumljene, obdolžene in zahtevane osebe, ne glede na njihov pravni status, državljanstvo ali nacionalnost.
Member States should respect and guarantee the rights set out in this Directive, without any discrimination based on any ground such as race, colour, sex, sexual orientation, language, religion, political or other opinion, nationality, ethnic or social origin, property, disability or birth.
Države članice bi morale spoštovati in zagotavljati pravice, ki so določene v tej direktivi, brez vsakršne diskriminacije na kateri koli podlagi, kot je denimo rasa, barva kože, spol, spolna usmerjenost, jezik, vera, politično ali drugo mnenje, nacionalnost, etnično ali socialno poreklo, premoženje, invalidnost ali rojstvo.
This Directive upholds the fundamental rights and principles recognised by the Charter and by the ECHR, including the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment, the right to liberty and security, respect for private and family life, the right to the integrity of the person, the rights of the child, the integration of persons with disabilities, the right to an effective remedy and the right to a fair trial, the presumption of innocence, and the rights of the defence.
Ta direktiva podpira temeljne pravice in načela, ki jih priznavata Listina in EKČP, vključno s prepovedjo mučenja ter nečloveškega ali ponižujočega ravnanja, pravico do svobode in varnosti, spoštovanjem zasebnega in družinskega življenja, pravico do osebne celovitosti, otrokovimi pravicami, vključenostjo invalidov, pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva in pravico do poštenega sojenja, domnevo nedolžnosti in pravicami obrambe.
Member States should be able to extend the rights laid down in this Directive in order to provide a higher level of protection.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da za zagotovitev višje ravni varstva razširijo pravice iz te direktive.
The level of protection provided for by Member States should never fall below the standards provided by the Charter or by the ECHR, as interpreted by the Court of Justice and by the ECtHR.
Raven varstva, ki jo zagotavljajo države članice, ne bi smela biti nikoli nižja od standardov, ki so določeni v Listini ali EKČP, kot ju razlagata Sodišče in ESČP.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely setting common minimum rules concerning the right to legal aid for suspects, accused persons and requested persons, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer določitve skupnih minimalnih pravil o pravici do brezplačne pravne pomoči za osumljene, obdolžene ter zahtevane osebe, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi svojega obsega in učinkov lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, those Member States are not taking part in the adoption of this Directive and are not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola št. 21 o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen PEU in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), ter brez poseganja v člen 4 navedenega protokola ti državi članici ne sodelujeta pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zato zanju ni zavezujoča in se v njiju ne uporablja.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Directive, and is not bound by it or subject to its application,
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola št. 22 o stališču Danske, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te direktive, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja –
This Directive lays down common minimum rules concerning the right to legal aid for:
Ta direktiva določa skupna minimalna pravila o pravici do brezplačne pravne pomoči za:
suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings; and
osumljene in obdolžene osebe v kazenskem postopku; in
persons who are the subject of European arrest warrant proceedings pursuant to Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (requested persons).
osebe v postopku na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje v skladu z Okvirnim sklepom 2002/584/PNZ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zahtevane osebe).
This Directive complements Directives 2013/48/EU and (EU) 2016/800.
Ta direktiva dopolnjuje direktivi 2013/48/EU in (EU) 2016/800.
Nothing in this Directive shall be interpreted as limiting the rights provided for in those Directives.
Ničesar v tej direktivi se ne sme razlagati kot omejevanje pravic, določenih v navedenih direktivah.
This Directive applies to suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings who have a right of access to a lawyer pursuant to Directive 2013/48/EU and who are:
Ta direktiva se uporablja za osumljene in obdolžene osebe v kazenskem postopku, ki imajo pravico do dostopa do odvetnika na podlagi Direktive 2013/48/EU in ki:
deprived of liberty;
jim je odvzeta prostost;
required to be assisted by a lawyer in accordance with Union or national law; or
morajo imeti pomoč odvetnika v skladu s pravom Unije ali nacionalnim pravom; ali
required or permitted to attend an investigative or evidence-gathering act, including as a minimum the following:
morajo biti navzoči, ali jim je dovoljeno, da so navzoči, pri preiskovalnih dejanjih ali dejanjih zbiranja dokazov, ki vključujejo vsaj:
identity parades;
prepoznave;
confrontations;
soočenja;
reconstructions of the scene of a crime.
rekonstrukcije kaznivega dejanja.
This Directive also applies, upon arrest in the executing Member State, to requested persons who have a right of access to a lawyer pursuant to Directive 2013/48/EU.
Ta direktiva se, od prijetja v izvršitveni državi članici, uporablja tudi za zahtevane osebe, ki imajo pravico do dostopa do odvetnika v skladu z Direktivo 2013/48/EU.
This Directive also applies, under the same conditions as provided for in paragraph 1, to persons who were not initially suspects or accused persons but become suspects or accused persons in the course of questioning by the police or by another law enforcement authority.
Ta direktiva se pod enakimi pogoji, kot so določeni v odstavku 1, uporablja tudi za osebe, ki prvotno niso bile osumljene ali obdolžene, vendar to postanejo med zaslišanjem, ki ga opravi policija ali drug organ preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj.
Without prejudice to the right to a fair trial, in respect of minor offences:
Brez poseganja v pravico do poštenega sojenja se v zvezi z manjšimi kršitvami:
where the law of a Member State provides for the imposition of a sanction by an authority other than a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters, and the imposition of such a sanction may be appealed or referred to such a court; or
če pravo države članice določa, da sankcijo izreče organ, ki ni sodišče, pristojno za kazenske zadeve, in se je zoper izrek te sankcije mogoče pritožiti na takšno sodišče ali pa ga je takšnemu sodišču mogoče predložiti, ali
where deprivation of liberty cannot be imposed as a sanction;
če odvzem prostosti ne more biti izrečen kot sankcija,
this Directive applies only to the proceedings before a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters.
ta direktiva uporablja le v postopkih pred sodiščem, ki je pristojno za kazenske zadeve.
In any event, this Directive applies when a decision on detention is taken, and during detention, at any stage of the proceedings until the conclusion of the proceedings.
V vsakem primeru se ta direktiva uporablja, ko se sprejema odločitev o pridržanju in med pridržanjem v kateri koli fazi postopka do zaključka postopka.
For the purposes of this Directive, ‘legal aid’ means funding by a Member State of the assistance of a lawyer, enabling the exercise of the right of access to a lawyer.
V tej direktivi „brezplačna pravna pomoč“ pomeni financiranje pomoči odvetnika – s strani države članice – ki omogoča izvajanje pravice do dostopa do odvetnika.
Legal aid in criminal proceedings
Brezplačna pravna pomoč v kazenskem postopku
Member States shall ensure that suspects and accused persons who lack sufficient resources to pay for the assistance of a lawyer have the right to legal aid when the interests of justice so require.
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo osumljene in obdolžene osebe, ki nimajo dovolj sredstev za plačilo pomoči odvetnika, pravico do brezplačne pravne pomoči, kadar to zahtevajo interesi pravičnosti.
Member States may apply a means test, a merits test, or both to determine whether legal aid is to be granted in accordance with paragraph 1.
Države članice lahko izvedejo oceno materialnega položaja, oceno upravičenosti na podlagi pravičnosti ali oboje, da ugotovijo, ali je treba dodeliti brezplačno pravno pomoč v skladu z odstavkom 1.
Where a Member State applies a means test, it shall take into account all relevant and objective factors, such as the income, capital and family situation of the person concerned, as well as the costs of the assistance of a lawyer and the standard of living in that Member State, in order to determine whether, in accordance with the applicable criteria in that Member State, a suspect or an accused person lacks sufficient resources to pay for the assistance of a lawyer.
Kadar država članica izvede oceno materialnega položaja, upošteva vse zadevne in objektivne dejavnike, kot so prihodki, premoženje in družinske razmere zadevne osebe, kot tudi stroški pomoči odvetnika in življenjski standard v tej državi članici, da ugotovi, ali v skladu z veljavnimi merili v tej državi članici osumljena ali obdolžena oseba nima dovolj sredstev za plačilo pomoči odvetnika.
Where a Member State applies a merits test, it shall take into account the seriousness of the criminal offence, the complexity of the case and the severity of the sanction at stake, in order to determine whether the interests of justice require legal aid to be granted.
Kadar država članica izvede oceno upravičenosti na podlagi pravičnosti, upošteva težo kaznivega dejanja, zapletenost zadeve in strogost sankcije, ki bi se pričakovano lahko izrekla, da ugotovi, ali je treba zaradi interesov pravičnosti dodeliti brezplačno pravno pomoč.
In any event, the merits test shall be deemed to have been met in the following situations:
V vsakem primeru se šteje, da so izpolnjeni pogoji, kar zadeva oceno upravičenosti na podlagi pravičnosti, v naslednjih primerih:
where a suspect or an accused person is brought before a competent court or judge in order to decide on detention at any stage of the proceedings within the scope of this Directive; and
ko je osumljena ali obdolžena oseba privedena pred pristojno sodišče ali sodnika, da se odloči o pridržanju v kateri koli fazi postopka v okviru področja uporabe te direktive, in
during detention.
med pridržanjem.
Member States shall ensure that legal aid is granted without undue delay, and at the latest before questioning by the police, by another law enforcement authority or by a judicial authority, or before the investigative or evidence-gathering acts referred to in point (c) of Article 2(1) are carried out.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se brezplačna pravna pomoč dodeli brez nepotrebnega odlašanja in najpozneje pred zaslišanjem s strani policije, drugega organa preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj ali pravosodnega organa oziroma pred izvedbo preiskovalnih dejanj ali dejanj zbiranja dokazov iz točke (c) člena 2(1).
Legal aid shall be granted only for the purposes of the criminal proceedings in which the person concerned is suspected or accused of having committed a criminal offence.
Brezplačna pravna pomoč se dodeli samo za namene kazenskega postopka, v katerem je zadevna oseba osumljena ali obdolžena storitve kaznivega dejanja.
Legal aid in European arrest warrant proceedings
Brezplačna pravna pomoč v postopku na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje
The executing Member State shall ensure that requested persons have a right to legal aid upon arrest pursuant to a European arrest warrant until they are surrendered, or until the decision not to surrender them becomes final.
Izvršitvena država članica zagotovi, da imajo zahtevane osebe pravico do brezplačne pravne pomoči od prijetja na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje do njihove predaje ali dokler odločitev, da se jih ne preda, ne postane pravnomočna.
The issuing Member State shall ensure that requested persons who are the subject of European arrest warrant proceedings for the purpose of conducting a criminal prosecution and who exercise their right to appoint a lawyer in the issuing Member State to assist the lawyer in the executing Member State in accordance with Article 10(4) and (5) of Directive 2013/48/EU have the right to legal aid in the issuing Member State for the purpose of such proceedings in the executing Member State, in so far as legal aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice.
Odreditvena država članica zagotovi, da imajo zahtevane osebe, ki so v postopku na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje zaradi uvedbe kazenskega postopka in ki uveljavljajo svojo pravico do izbire odvetnika v odreditveni državi članici, ki bo pomagal odvetniku v izvršitveni državi članici v skladu s členom 10(4) in (5) Direktive 2013/48/EU, pravico do brezplačne pravne pomoči v odreditveni državi članici za namene takšnih postopkov v izvršitveni državi članici, v kolikor je ta potrebna za zagotovitev učinkovitega dostopa do sodnega varstva.
The right to legal aid referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 may be subject to a means test in accordance with Article 4(3), which shall apply mutatis mutandis.
Pravica brezplačne pravne pomoči iz odstavkov 1 in 2 je lahko pogojena z oceno materialnega položaja v skladu s členom 4(3), ki se uporablja smiselno.
Decisions regarding the granting of legal aid
Odločitve v zvezi z dodelitvijo brezplačne pravne pomoči
Decisions on whether or not to grant legal aid and on the assignment of lawyers shall be made, without undue delay, by a competent authority.
Pristojni organ brez nepotrebnega odlašanja odloči o tem, ali se brezplačna pravna pomoč dodeli ali ne, ter o dodelitvi odvetnikov.
Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that the competent authority takes its decisions diligently, respecting the rights of the defence.
Države članice sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovijo, da pristojni organ te odločitve sprejema skrbno, pri tem pa spoštuje pravice obrambe.
Member States shall take necessary measures to ensure that suspects, accused persons and requested persons are informed in writing if their request for legal aid is refused in full or in part.
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovijo, da so osumljene, obdolžene ter zahtevane osebe pisno obveščene o popolni ali delni zavrnitvi prošnje za brezplačno pravno pomoč.
Quality of legal aid services and training
Kakovost brezplačne pravne pomoči in usposabljanja
Member States shall take necessary measures, including with regard to funding, to ensure that:
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, tudi glede financiranja, za zagotovitev:
there is an effective legal aid system that is of an adequate quality; and
učinkovitega sistema brezplačne pravne pomoči, ki je ustrezno kakovosten, in
legal aid services are of a quality adequate to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings, with due respect for the independence of the legal profession.
storitev brezplačne pravne pomoči, ki so ustrezno kakovostne za to, da zagotovijo poštenost postopka, ob ustreznem spoštovanju neodvisnosti pravnega poklica.
Member States shall ensure that adequate training is provided to staff involved in the decision-making on legal aid in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se osebju, ki je vključeno v sprejemanje odločitev o brezplačni pravni pomoči v kazenskem postopku in postopku na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje, zagotovi primerno usposabljanje.
With due respect for the independence of the legal profession and for the role of those responsible for the training of lawyers, Member States shall take appropriate measures to promote the provision of adequate training to lawyers providing legal aid services.
Države članice ob ustreznem spoštovanju neodvisnosti pravnega poklica in vloge tistih, ki so odgovorni za usposabljanje odvetnikov, sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za spodbujanje zagotavljanja ustreznega usposabljanja odvetnikom, ki nudijo storitve brezplačne pravne pomoči.