natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poland is of the opinion that the public financing of the conversion project at Gdynia airfield complies with all the criteria for investment aid in the 2005 Aviation Guidelines.
Poljska je nezakonito uporabila pomoč in prekršila člen 108(3) PDEU.
Construction and operation of the infrastructure meets a clearly defined objective of common interest (regional development, accessibility, etc.)
IZTERJAVA
The Commission notes that Pomerania is already efficiently served by Gdańsk airport, which is only about 25 km away from the planned new airport.
V skladu s PDEU in uveljavljeno sodno prakso Sodišča je Komisija pristojna za odločitev, ali mora zadevna država članica odpraviti ali spremeniti pomoč, za katero je Komisija ugotovila, da je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom [76].
Gdańsk airport is located next to the Tricity ring road, which is part of the S6 express road that bypasses Gdynia, Sopot and Gdańsk and provides the large majority of Pomerania's inhabitants with easy access to the airport.
Sodišče ves čas vztraja tudi pri tem, da je obveznost države, da odpravi pomoč, ki jo Komisija šteje za nezdružljivo s skupnim trgom, namenjena za ponovno vzpostavitev prejšnjih razmer [77].
Even for Gdynia's inhabitants, the construction of a new airport would not in itself lead to a substantial improvement in connectivity, since both Gdynia and Gdańsk airports are about 20-25 minutes by car from the centre of Gdynia.
V zvezi s tem je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je cilj dosežen, ko prejemnik povrne zneske, ki so mu bili dodeljeni v obliki nezakonite pomoči, in tako izgubi prednost, ki jo je imel pred tekmeci na trgu, ter ko se znova vzpostavijo razmere pred izplačilom pomoči [78].
The Commission also observes that the Tricity Metropolitan Rail link currently being built with co-financing from the Union's structural funds will enable residents of both Gdańsk and Gdynia to travel directly from the centre of their town to Gdańsk airport in about 25 minutes.
V skladu z navedeno sodno prakso je v členu 14 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 [79] določeno, da „če se v primerih nezakonite pomoči sprejmejo negativne odločbe, Komisija odloči, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da upravičenec vrne pomoč“.
The Tricity Metropolitan Rail will also provide people in other areas of Pomerania with direct or indirect rail links to Gdańsk airport.
Zato je treba zgoraj navedeno državno pomoč, kolikor je bila izplačana, povrniti poljskim organom.
The Commission also observes that Gdańsk airport currently has a capacity of 5 million passengers a year, whereas actual passenger traffic in 2010 to 2013 was as follows: 2010 — 2,2 million, 2011 — 2,5 million, 2012 — 2,9 million, 2013 — 2,8 million.
Komisija opozarja, da v skladu z uveljavljeno sodno prakso dejstvo, da so podjetja v težavah ali v stečaju, ne vpliva na obveznost držav članic, da izterjajo pomoč [80].
The Commission also notes that Gdańsk airport is currently being expanded to handle 7 million passengers a year.
V teh primerih je mogoče vzpostavitev prejšnjega stanja in odpravo izkrivljanja konkurence, ki izhaja iz nezakonitega izplačila pomoči, načeloma doseči z vpisom terjatve v zvezi z vrnitvijo takšne pomoči v seznam terjatev [81].
This investment is to be completed in 2015.
Vpis terjatve omogoča izpolnitev obveznosti zagotovitve vračila samo, če bi stečajni postopek takrat, ko državni organi ne morejo zagotoviti vračila celotnega zneska pomoči, povzročil prenehanje zadevnega podjetja, to je popolno prenehanje njegove dejavnosti [82] –
In addition, according to the traffic forecast provided by Poland for Pomerania and used to prepare the 2012 MEIP study, total demand in the region will be […] million passengers a year […].
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Table 9
Člen 1
Traffic projections for Pomerania (in millions)
Sklep 2014/883/EU se umakne.
The Commission also observes that, according to the information provided by Poland, the masterplan for Gdańsk airport provides for further expansion of the airport to handle more than 10 million passengers a year.
Člen 2
Depending on the development of traffic, a decision to expand the capacity of the Gdańsk airport above 7 million may therefore be taken in the future.
Dokapitalizacije v korist družbe Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd, zagotovljene med 28. avgustom 2007 in 17. junijem 2013, pomenijo državno pomoč, ki jo je Poljska v nasprotju s členom 108(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije nezakonito dodelila in je nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom, razen če so se te dokapitalizacije porabile za naložbe, potrebne za opravljanje dejavnosti, ki jih je treba v skladu s Sklepom C(2013) 4045 final obravnavati kot dejavnosti s področja javne politike.
However, even this forecast shows that Gdańsk airport alone would be sufficient, without further investment, to meet demand in the region until at least 2025 (on the basis of the adjusted traffic forecasts described in recital 63).
Člen 3
Furthermore, according to the information provided by Poland, current runway capacity at Gdańsk airport is 40-44 operations an hour, while use is currently averaging 4,7 operations an hour.
Poljska od upravičenca izterja pomoč, navedeno v členu 2(1).
On the basis of information provided by Poland (see recitals 209 to 213 above) the Commission observes that Gdańsk airport will be used at only about 50–60 % of its capacity in the coming years.
Za zneske, ki jih je treba izterjati, se do njihove dejanske izterjave obračunajo obresti od datuma, ko jih je upravičenec dobil na voljo.
As a result, even with fast growth in passenger numbers in Pomerania, Gdańsk airport will be able to meet demand from airlines and passengers for a long time.
Obresti se izračunajo z obrestnoobrestnim računom v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 [83].
The Commission further observes that Gdańsk airport offers more than 40 national and international destinations (both point-to-point connections and connections to hub such as Frankfurt, Munich, Warsaw and Copenhagen).
Poljska prekliče vsa neizplačana plačila pomoči iz člena 2(2) od datuma priglasitve tega sklepa.
As mentioned in recital 78, Poland argues, on the one hand, that the scope for expanding capacity at Gdańsk airport is limited for planning and environmental reasons.
Člen 4
On the other hand, it also argues that there are no limits on the scope for expanding capacity at Gdańsk airport.
Pomoč iz člena 2(1) in obresti iz člena 3(2) se povrnejo takoj in učinkovito.
As the arguments regarding the capacity expansion restrictions are contradictory and are not substantiated anyway, the Commission considers that it cannot base its assessment on them.
Poljska zagotavlja, da se ta sklep izvede v štirih mesecih od priglasitve.
The Commission also notes that the business model for Gdynia airport suggests that it would compete for passengers with Gdańsk airport in the LCC, charter and general aviation markets.
skupni znesek (glavnica in obresti), ki ga mora upravičenec vrniti;
Moreover, the creation of a new airport to serve as a back-up, emergency airport cannot justify the scale of investment at Gdynia airport.
podroben opis že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepov za skladnost s tem sklepom;
As mentioned in recital 77, Poland refers to the ‘Regional transport development strategy in Pomorskie province for 2007 - 2020’ that according to Poland recognised a need to build a hub of closely collaborating airports serving Pomerania.
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da se je od upravičenca zahtevalo vračilo pomoči.
The Commission notes however that the ‘Regional transport development strategy in Pomorskie province for 2007-2020’ presents only the possible strategic directions in which the transport in the region can or should be developed.
Poljska obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede sprejetih nacionalnih ukrepov za izvajanje tega sklepa, dokler se povračilo pomoči iz člena 2(1) in obresti iz člena 3(2) ne konča.
The conclusions on Gdynia airport are of a very general nature.
Takoj predloži tudi vse informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za skladnost s tem sklepom, ki jih zahteva Komisija.
Moreover, the document does not set out any implementing steps ensuring the use of Gdynia airport for civil aviation.
Prav tako predloži podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obresti, ki jih je upravičenec že vrnil.
Nor does it impose any obligations concerning this objective.
Člen 6
On the contrary, the document underlines that ‘Plans for the development of commercial activities at airports Gdynia Kosakowo or Slupsk Redzikowo should primarily be directed at capacity that is economically viable and satisfies existing demand and the possibility of handling freight where it is profitable.’
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Republiko Poljsko.
Similarly, the letter of intent signed on 29 April 2005 by the Ministry of National Defence, the Ministry of Transport, Gdańsk airport and various regional authorities (mentioned in recital 21 of this Decision) is of a very general character, expressing only the intention to introduce civil aviation to the military airfield in Kosakowo.
V Bruslju, 26. februarja 2015
The Commission also notes that following the adoption of Decision 2014/883/EU, the governor of Pomorskie province together with the mayors of Gdańsk and Sopot (two out of three biggest cities in the region and shareholders in Gdańsk airport) made a written statement.
Za Komisijo
In this statement, they declared that they had not signed the letter of 29 April 2005 with the intention of starting the construction of a new airport in Gdynia.
Članica Komisije
According to the statement, the letter of intent was signed only to safeguard the infrastructure of the existing military airfield for the future cooperation of this military airfield with Gdańsk airport.
UL C 243, 23.8.2013, str. 25.
In this context, Gdynia airport could serve GA traffic only.
S 1. decembrom 2009 sta člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES postala člen 107 oziroma člen 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
The local authorities also underlined that the decision to set up Gdynia airport was an independent decision of Gdynia and Kosakowo, which were repeatedly informed that this investment had no economic justification.
Oba niza določb sta vsebinsko enaka.
In a letter dated 6 August 2013 Poland announced that the shareholders in Gdańsk airport (including Gdynia) had decided on 30 July 2013 (i.e. after the opening of formal investigation procedure) to set up a working group to analyse the possible scenarios for cooperation of Gdynia and Gdańsk airports.
V tem sklepu je treba sklicevanje na člena 107 in 108 PDEU razumeti kot sklicevanje na člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES, kadar je to primerno.
In a letter of 30 October 2013 (provided to the Commission on 4 November 2013), the Mayor of Gdynia reported that the working group had recommended to Gdańsk airport's shareholders that the two Pomeranian airports be merged (by Gdańsk airport taking over Gdynia airport).
S PDEU so bile uvedene tudi nekatere spremembe izrazja, na primer besedo „Skupnost“ je zamenjala beseda „Unija“, besedno zvezo „skupni trg“ pa „notranji trg“.
The Mayor also reported that the details of such a merger were still being analysed.
V celotnem besedilu tega sklepa se uporablja terminologija PDEU.
In the Commission's view, the setting-up of the working group was dictated solely by the opening of the formal investigation procedure and cannot be seen as proof of the implementation of a regional transport strategy.
Sklep, ki je bil priglašen Poljski pod številko zadeve C(2013) 4045 final, je bil objavljen s povzetkom v UL C 243, 23.8.2013, str. 25.
It should also be underlined that the Commission was not informed about any earlier or later actions concerning cooperation between the two Pomeranian airports.
Sklep Komisije 2014/883/EU z dne 11. februarja 2014 o ukrepu SA.35388 (13/C) (ex 13/NN in ex 12/N) – Poljska – Vzpostavitev letališča Gdynia-Kosakowo (UL L 357, 12.12.2014, str. 51).
The Commission also notes that cooperation between Gdynia airport with Gdańsk airport in the framework of a hub would not eliminate a duplication of infrastructure with no basis in actual transport needs.
Ta predloga sta bila evidentirana kot zadevi T-215/14 in T-217/14.
In the light of the above, the Commission considers that the investment in Gdynia airport will lead simply to the duplication of infrastructure in the region, which does not meet a clearly defined objective of common interest.
Sklep predsednika Splošnega sodišča v zadevi T-215/14 R, Gmina Miasto Gdynia in Port Lotniczy Gdynia Kosakowo proti Komisiji, EU:T:2014:733; Sklep predsednika Splošnega sodišča v zadevi T-217/14 R, Gmina Kosakowo proti Komisiji, neobjavljen.
The infrastructure is necessary and proportional to the objective which has been set
Dopisa predsednika Urada za varstvo konkurence in varstvo potrošnikov z dne 30. junija 2014 in 8. januarja 2015.
As stated in recitals 206 to 226, the Commission considers that the catchment area of Gdynia airport is and will continue to be efficiently served by Gdańsk airport.
Odvisno od izbrane poti sta letališči Gdynia in Gdańsk oddaljeni od 26 do 29 kilometrov vožnje z avtomobilom; vir: zemljevidi Google in Bing.
In addition, both airports would pursue a similar business model and focus mainly on LCCs and charter flights.
Lastnik in upravljavec letališča Gdańsk je družba Gdańsk Lech Wałęsa Airport Ltd, ki so jo ustanovili javni subjekti.
In the absence of a clearly defined objective of common interest the Commission considers that the infrastructure cannot be considered to be necessary and proportional to an objective of common interest (see also recital 226).
Delniški kapital družbe si delijo mesto Gdańsk (32 %), Pomorjansko vojvodstvo (32 %), družba „Polish Airports“ State Enterprise (31 %), mesto Sopot (3 %) in mesto Gdynia (2 %).
The infrastructure has satisfactory medium-term prospects for use, in particular as regards the use of existing infrastructure
Letališče Gdańsk Lech Wałęsa (v nadaljnjem besedilu: letališče Gdańsk) je tretje največje letališče na Poljskem.
As stated in point (i), Gdynia airport is only about 25 km away from the existing Gdańsk airport, and the two airports have the same catchment area and a similar business model.
Leta 2012 je imelo 2,9 milijona potnikov (2,7 milijona na rednih zračnih prevozih in 0,2 milijona na čarterskih letih).
Gdańsk airport is currently used at less than 60 % of its capacity.
Redne zračne prevoze z letališča Gdańsk je zagotavljalo naslednjih osem letalskih prevoznikov (januarja 2014): Wizzair (22 destinacij), Ryanair (7 destinacij), Eurolot (4 destinacije), LOT (2 destinaciji), Lufthansa (2 destinaciji), SAS (2 destniaciji), Air Berlin (1 destinacija), Norwegian (1 destinacija).
Taking into account the investments currently being carried out, Gdańsk airport is sufficient to handle demand in the region until at least 2025-2028, depending on the forecasts used, and its further expansion is feasible.
Od odprtja novega terminala maja 2012 ima letališče Gdańsk zmogljivost pet milijonov potnikov na leto.
The Commission also notes that the business plan for Gdynia airport indicates that the airport would generate about [80-90] % of its revenue from serving low-cost and charter carriers.
Po informacijah, ki jih je zagotovila Poljska, se bo s širitvijo terminala (predvideno v letih 2013–2015) zmogljivost letališča povečala na sedem milijonov potnikov.
This means that it would be focussing on the markets that represent Gdańsk airport's core business.
Naložba v letališče Gdańsk se je financirala tudi z državno pomočjo (glej sklep Komisije iz leta 2008 v zadevi v zvezi z državno pomočjo N 153/08 – 1,7 milijona EUR (UL C 46, 25.2.2009, str. 7); sklep Komisije iz leta 2009 v zadevi v zvezi z državno pomočjo N 472/08, na podlagi katerega je Poljska letališču Gdańsk dodelila približno 33 milijonov EUR (UL C 79, 2.4.2009, str. 2)).
In this context, the Commission also observes that Poland has provided no proof of possible cooperation between both airports (see also recitals 224 and 225).
Sedanje vojaško letališče Gdynia-Oksywie je na meji med mestom Gdynia in občino Kosakowo.
The plans to generate revenues from other aviation and non–aviation activities (production and services) would not be sufficient in themselves to cover the high operating costs related to running Gdynia airport either.
Pismo so podpisali organi Pomorjanskega vojvodstva, mest Gdańsk, Gdynia in Sopot in občine Kosakowo ter predstavniki poljske vlade (guverner Pomorjanskega vojvodstva, ministrstvo za obrambo in ministrstvo za promet) in letališča Gdańsk.
The Commission therefore considers that Gdynia airport does not offer satisfactory medium-term prospects for use.
Uradni list iz leta 2008, št. 144, točka 901 (Dz.
All potential users of the infrastructure have access to it in an equal and non-discriminatory manner
U. Št. 144, poz. 901).
Poland confirmed that all potential users would have access to the airport infrastructure on an equal and non-discriminatory basis without any commercially unjustified discrimination.
S to klavzulo se izvaja člen 4h(2) zakona z dne 30. maja 1996, kot je bil spremenjen.
The development of trade is not affected to an extent contrary to the common interest
V sporazumu o poslovanju je določeno, da delitev stroškov poslovanja ureja ločen sporazum (odstavek 5(5)), delitev naložbenih stroškov in stroškov prenov pa ločeni sporazumi, ki jih pogodbenici skleneta pred novimi naložbami ali prenovitvenimi deli (odstavek 9(7)).
The Commission notes that Poland has not provided any proof that Gdynia and Gdańsk airports would form a collaborative aviation hub.
Naložbeni stroški, predstavljeni v tem delu, izražajo naložbeni projekt, kot je bil predstavljen v dopisu Poljske z dne 7. septembra 2012 in študiji načela VPTP iz leta 2012, predloženi z dopisom.
Logic suggests that the two airports would actually have to compete for essentially attracting the same passengers.
Po mnenju Poljske naložba s področja javne politike vključuje zgradbe in opremo za gasilce, carinike, letališke varnostnike, policiste in mejne policiste, zunanjo ograjo letališča z video nadzorom itd.
The Commission further notes that the business plan of Gdynia airport (in which about [80-90] % of revenue is generated by low-cost and charter flights) and the scale of the investment (e.g. a terminal with a capacity of 0,5 million passengers a year that is to be expanded in the future) do not substantiate the claim that Gdynia airport would focus on general aviation traffic and would provide only or mainly services to the general aviation sector.
Nominalno.
Taking into account the above and the fact that both airports would focus on LCC and charter flights, the Commission considers that the aid is directed to an airport which would be in direct competition with another airport in the same catchment area, without there being any demand for airport services that could not be met by the existing airport.
Neto sedanja vrednost kaže, ali donosnost danega projekta presega (oportunitetne) stroške kapitala.
The Commission therefore considers that the aid in question would affect trade to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Projekt velja za ekonomsko uspešno naložbo, če ima pozitivno neto sedanjo vrednost.
This conclusion is reinforced by the absence of a common interest objective that the aid is intended to achieve.
Naložbe, ki imajo nižjo donosnost od (oportunitetnih) stroškov kapitala, niso ekonomsko uspešne.
Based on the data provided by Poland, the Commission considers that the investment costs may be lower than for the construction of other comparable regional airports in Poland.
(Oportunitetni) stroški kapitala se kažejo v diskontni stopnji.
This is due mainly to the use of existing infrastructure at the military airfield.
Končna vrednost je sedanja vrednost vseh denarnih tokov, ustvarjenih po izteku obdobja napovedi.
Moreover, Poland argues that without the aid the investment would not be undertaken by the airport operator.
Pri tem se predpostavlja, da bo projekt trajal neskončno in rasel v skladu s predhodno določeno stopnjo rasti (v zadevnem primeru na podlagi vrednosti lastniškega kapitala upravljavca letališča v zadnjem letu predloženega poslovnega načrta).
The Commission further observes that the long period necessary to reach the break-even point for this type of investment means that public financing could be necessary to modify the beneficiary behaviour's in such a way that it proceeds with the investment.
Sporočilo Komisije – Smernice Skupnosti o financiranju letališč in zagonski državni pomoči letalskim družbam z odhodi z regionalnih letališč (UL C 312, 9.12.2005, str. 1).
Moreover, since the expected profitability of the investment project cannot be established (see recital 185) and a market economy investor would not pursue such project, it is indeed likely that the aid is changing the behaviour of the airport operator.
Smernice o državni regionalni pomoči za 2007–2013 (UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str. 13).
However, in the absence of a clearly defined objective in the common interest, the Commission concludes that the aid cannot be considered necessary and proportional to that objective.
Notranja stopnja donosa naložbe je diskontna stopnja, po kateri je neto sedanja vrednost enaka nič.
The Commission therefore considers that the investment aid by Gdynia and Kosakowo in favour of Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport Ltd does not comply with the requirements of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines and cannot be considered compatible with the internal market.
Notranja stopnja donosa se običajno primerja s stroški kapitala.
The Commission based its assessment of the operating aid in recital 227 of Decision 2014/883/EU on the finding that ‘granting operating aid in order to ensure the operation of an investment project that benefits of incompatible investment aid is inherently incompatible with the internal market.’
Pravila, ki so se uporabljala v tistem obdobju, so bila določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1998/2006 z dne 15. decembra 2006 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe pri pomoči de minimis (UL L 379, 28.12.2006, str. 5).
Without the incompatible investment aid Gdynia airport would not exist, as it is entirely financed by that aid, and operating aid cannot be granted for non-existent airport infrastructure.
V glavnem načrtu naložbenega projekta so bili opredeljeni različni ukrepi, potrebni za preureditev letališča.
That conclusion under the 2005 Aviation Guidelines is equally valid under the 2014 Aviation Guidelines and sufficient to find that the operating aid granted to the airport operator is incompatible with the internal market.
Prosti denarni tok podjetja se uporablja za izračun vsakoletnega zaslužka podjetja pred obrestmi in davki s prišteto amortizacijo (ker gre za nedenarne stroške) ter odštetimi naložbenimi potrebami, spremembami obratnih sredstev in davki (glej preglednico 5 študije načela VPTP iz leta 2010).
Moreover, the first compatibility condition established by the 2014 Aviation Guidelines, according to which operating aid can be considered compatible if it contributes to a well-defined objective of common interest in the form of increasing the mobility of citizens of the Union and connectivity of the regions or facilitates regional development, is clearly not met if the operating aid at issue is aimed at ensuring the functioning of an airport that has been built exclusively with investment aid that is incompatible with the internal market.
Povprečni tehtani stroški kapitala so stopnja, ki naj bi jo družba predvidoma plačala vsem imetnikom njenih vrednostnih papirjev za financiranje njenih sredstev.
Accordingly, the Commission considers that recitals 203 et seq.
Temeljijo na netvegani stopnji v višini […] %, premiji kreditnega tveganja v višini […] %, stopnji davka od dohodkov pravnih oseb v višini 19 %, faktorju beta […], stopnjo tržne premije v višini […] % in kapitalsko sestavo […] % dolga in […] % lastniškega kapitala (glej razdelek 4.4 na strani 21 študije načela VPTP iz leta 2010).