natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to ensure the continuity of control measures across the Union with regard to 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole, this Decision should be without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time limit for subjecting that new psychoactive substance to control measures and criminal penalties in their national laws, as set out in Article 2 of Decision 2013/496/EU.
Sklep 2005/387/PNZ je za Irsko zavezujoč, zato sodeluje pri sprejetju in uporabi tega sklepa, s katerim se izvaja Sklep 2005/387/PNZ.
Denmark is bound by Decision 2005/387/JHA and is therefore taking part in the adoption and application of this Decision which implements Decision 2005/387/JHA.
Sklep 2005/387/PNZ ni zavezujoč za Združeno kraljestvo, zato ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, s katerim se izvaja Sklep 2005/387/PNZ in zanj ni zavezujoč niti se v njem ne uporablja –
The United Kingdom is not bound by Decision 2005/387/JHA and is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Decision which implements Decision 2005/387/JHA and is not bound by it or subject to its application,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Za novo psihoaktivno snov 5-(2-aminopropil)indol se uvedejo nadzorni ukrepi v vsej Uniji.
The new psychoactive substance 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole shall be subjected to control measures across the Union.
Sklep 2013/496/EU preneha učinkovati z dnem začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa, vendar brez poseganja v obveznosti držav članic v zvezi z roki za uvedbo nadzornih ukrepov in kazenskih sankcij za 5-(2-aminopropil)indol v nacionalno zakonodajo, kot določa člen 2 Sklepa 2013/496/EU.
Decision 2013/496/EU ceases to produce effects from the date of entry into force of this Decision, without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time limit for subjecting 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole to control measures and criminal penalties in their national laws, as set out in Article 2 of Decision 2013/496/EU.
Ta sklep začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
For the Council
UL L 127, 20.5.2005, str.
The President
32.
OJ L 127, 20.5.2005, p.
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta z dne 7. oktobra 2013 o uvedbi nadzornih ukrepov za 5-(2-aminopropil)indol (UL L 272, 12.10.2013, str.
32.
44).
Council Implementing Decision (2013/496/EU) of 7 October 2013 on subjecting 5-(2-aminopropyl)indole to control measures (OJ L 272, 12.10.2013, p.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. aprila 2015, Evropski parlament proti Svetu Evropske unije, C-679/13, ECLI:EU:C:2015:223.
44).
Dve državi članici za nadzor nad to novo psihoaktivno snovjo uporabljata nacionalno zakonodajo v skladu z njunimi obveznostmi iz Konvencije Združenih narodov o psihotropnih snoveh iz leta 1971.
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1877
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/1877
on tariffs charged by S.C.
o cenah, ki jih je podjetje S.C.
Hidroelectrica SA of Romania to S.C.
Hidroelectrica S.A. iz Romunije zaračunalo podjetjema S.C.
Termoelectrica SA and S.C.
Termoelectrica S.A. in S.C.
Electrocentrale Deva SA — SA.33475 (12/C)
Electrocentrale Deva S.A. – SA.33475 (12/C)
(notified under document number C(2015) 2648)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2015) 2648)
Having regard to the decision by which the Commission initiated the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty, in respect of the aid SA.33475 (12/C, ex 12/NN) [1],
ob upoštevanju odločitve, s katero je Komisija začela postopek na podlagi člena 108(2) Pogodbe, v zvezi s pomočjo SA.33475 (12/C, ex 12/NN) [1],
Having called on third parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above, and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem tretjim osebam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
On 2 August 2011, the Commission received a complaint from the investment fund S.C.
Komisija je 2. avgusta 2011 prejela pritožbo naložbenega sklada S.C.
Fondul Proprietatea SA (‘the complainant’) in relation to the purchase of electricity by S.C.
Fondul Proprietatea S.A. („pritožnik“) v zvezi z nakupom električne energije podjetja S.C.
Hidroelectrica SA (‘Hidroelectrica’) from electricity suppliers at prices allegedly set above market level.
Hidroelectrica S.A. („Hidroelectrica“) od dobaviteljev električne energije po cenah, ki so bile domnevno nad tržno ravnijo.
On 25 April 2012, the Commission informed Romania that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty in respect of the contracts whereby Termoelectrica SA (‘Termoelectrica’) and S.C.
Komisija je 25. aprila 2012 obvestila Romunijo, da je sklenila začeti postopek na podlagi člena 108(2) Pogodbe v zvezi s pogodbama, po katerih sta podjetji Termoelectrica S.A. („Termoelectrica“) in S.C.
Electrocentrale Deva SA (‘Electrocentrale Deva’) supplied electricity wholesale to Hidroelectrica, hereafter referred as the ‘Opening Decision’.
Electrocentrale Deva S.A. („Electrocentrale Deva“) grosistično dobavili električno energijo podjetju Hidroelectrica, v nadaljnjem besedilu „sklep o začetku postopka“.
The Commission called on the Romanian authorities and interested parties to submit their comments.
Komisija je pozvala romunske organe in vse zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo svoje pripombe.
On 23 July 2012 the Romanian Authorities provided the Commission with their preliminary comments on the Opening Decision.
Romunski organi so 23. julija 2012 Komisiji predložili predhodne pripombe v zvezi s sklepom o začetku postopka.
The Romanian Authorities forwarded again the same preliminary comments to the Commission on 2 August 2012.
Romunski organi so 24. marca 2013 ponovno izrazili svoje predhodno stališče v zvezi s to zadevo.
On 12 February 2013, the Commission informed the Romanian Authorities that it had not received any comments from interested parties.
Romunija se je 16. aprila 2015 odpovedala svojim pravicam iz člena 342 Pogodbe v povezavi s členom 3 Uredbe št. 1 [3] do sprejetja sklepa v romunskem jeziku in se je strinjala, da se sklep sprejme v angleškem jeziku.
The Commission requested further information from the Romanian Authorities by letters dated 29 July and 11 September 2013, 3 March, 6 August and 25 September 2014 and 19 January 2015.
Ta oddelek opisuje pogodbene stranke (tj. podjetja Hidroelectrica, Termoelectrica in Electrocentrale Deva), druge proizvajalce električne energije, pogodbe za nakup električne energije v okviru romunskega trga z električno energijo ter različne dogodke in medsebojne povezave domnevnih upravičencev.
The Romanian Authorities provided further information on 11 September 2013, 24 March, 14 May, 3 September, 22 September, 10 October and 21 October 2014 and on 20 February 2015.
Pogodbene stranke
On 16 April 2015, Romania waived its rights under Article 342 of the Treaty in conjunction with Article 3 of Regulation No 1 [3] to have the decision adopted in Romanian and agreed that the decision be adopted in English.
Osnovni kapital podjetja je v lasti romunske države prek ministrstva za gospodarstvo in trgovino (80,06 %) in pritožnika (19,94 %).
DESCRIPTION OF THE AID MEASURES
Romunska država je zastopana v odboru skupščine delničarjev podjetja Hidroelectrica.
The contracting parties
V praksi so direktorji podjetja Hidroelectrica združevali funkcije z vladnimi položaji [4].
Hidroelectrica was established in 2000.
Podjetje Hidroelectrica je glavni proizvajalec električne energije v Romuniji z letno zmogljivostjo proizvodnje približno 17,5 TWh v običajnem hidrološkem letu.
Hidroelectrica is governed by ordinary company law.
Podjetje Hidroelectrica proizvaja električno energijo z jezovi in pretočnimi elektrarnami.
Its share capital is held by the Romanian State through the Ministry of Economy and Trade (80,06 %) and the complainant (19,94 %).
Vendar v takšni proizvodnji pride do velikih razlik glede na vremenske razmere: leta 2009 je proizvodnja podjetja Hidroelectrica znašala 16,4 TWh, leta 2010 21,3 TWh in leta 2011 14,7 TWh.
The Romanian State is represented in the Shareholder Meeting's Board of Hidroelectrica.
Leta 2013 je tržni delež podjetja Hidroelectrica znašal 28,24 % in je bil večji od tržnega deleža podjetij Complexul Energetic Oltenia, proizvajalca termalne energije iz premoga, ki je imel 20,83-odstotni tržni delež, in Nuclearelectrica z 20,65-odstotnim tržnim deležem, obe podjetji pa sta v državni lasti.
According to Hidroelectrica's Articles of Incorporation, the General Director runs and represents the company's day-to-day business and independently takes decisions on matters other than those reserved for the Shareholders' Meeting Board and the Board of Directors.
Upravičenca
In practice Hidroelectrica's Directors cumulated functions with government posts [4].
Podjetje Electrocentrale Deva je bila poslovna enota podjetja Termoelectrica do konca decembra 2001, ko je bilo ustanovljeno kot ločeno podjetje skupaj z drugimi poslovnimi enotami v državni lasti (CE Craiova, Electrocentrale Bucuresti, CE Rovinari itd.).
Hidroelectrica is Romania's main electricity generator with an annual production capacity of around 17,5 TWh in a normal hydrological year.
Edini družbenik podjetja Electrocentrale Deva je bilo do 27. marca 2012 podjetje Termoelectrica.
However, this production is subject to wide variations depending on hydrological conditions: in 2009, Hidroelectrica's output was 16,4 TWh, in 2010, it was 21,3 TWh and in 2011, it was 14,7 TWh.
Pri proizvodnji električne energije v Romuniji prevladujejo podjetja, ki so pod nadzorom države in imajo skupaj približno 90-odstotni tržni delež [10].
Hidroelectrica was placed under insolvency proceedings on 26 June 2012 [5] and exited them on 26 June 2013 [6].
Pogodbi
On 25 February 2014, Hidroelectrica was again placed under insolvency proceedings.
Pogodba s podjetjem Termoelectrica je bila sklenjena 30. julija 2008 [12], medtem ko je bila pogodba s podjetjem Electrocentrale Deva sklenjena 9. junija 2009 (v tem sklepu skupno imenovani „pogodbi“) za obdobje desetih let.
The beneficiaries
Pogodbi je konec avgusta 2012 med postopkom zaradi insolventnosti podjetja Hidroelectrica prekinil sodni upravitelj Euro-Insol podjetja Hidroelectrica [13].
The suppliers with which Hidroelectrica entered into the contracts under investigation are Termoelectrica and Electrocentrale Deva, two coal-based electricity producers, fully state-owned, directly or indirectly, with an annual production capacity at the date of signature of the contracts of 1,7 TW and 1,3 TW respectively and market shares of 3 % and 5 % in 2009 [7] and of 1,9 % and 4,1 % in 2011 [8].
V sporočilih romunskemu ministrstvu za gospodarstvo in trgovino sta podjetji Termoelectrica in Electrocentrale Deva zaprosili za soglasje ministrstva k podpisu pogodb, kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 20 do 22:
The sole shareholder of Electrocentrale Deva was Termoelectrica until 27 March 2012.
Podjetjema Termoelectrica SA (SE Paroșeni) in Compania Națională a Huilei [14] bi to […] zagotovilo dolgoročno prihodnost obeh podjetij v dolini Jiu.“
Other market information
Podjetje Electrocentrale Deva je 27. maja 2009 v sporočilu številka 10855 zahtevalo: „[…] Da bi preprečili stečaj podjetja in ustvarili pogoje, potrebne za financiranje in izvajanje potrebnih naložb za nadaljnje obratovanje, vas prosimo, da podate odobritev za pogajanja in sklenitev 10-letne pogodbe med podjetjema Electrocentrale Deva in Hidroelectrica București za prodajo električne energije podjetju Hidroelectrica, in sicer v količini, ki ustreza povprečni moči 150 MW poleg količine, dobavljene na organiziranem trgu in po ceni, ki jo odobri ANRE in ki bo pokrila utemeljene stroške proizvodnje.“
Electricity generation in Romania is dominated by state-controlled companies, which together hold a market share of approximately 90 % [10].
Obe sporočili so odobrili predstavniki romunskega ministrstva za gospodarstvo in trgovino na ravni ministra in/ali državnega sekretarja.
Total net electricity generation in Romania amounted to 60,38 TWh in 2011.
V pogodbah je navedeno, da sta bili sklenjeni na podlagi teh sporočil.
The generation mix consists mainly of hydro (approximately 28 % of total generation), nuclear (approximately 18 %) and fossil-fuel-based (approximately 51 %) power plants [11].
V pogodbi s podjetjem Termoelectrica nista ne Hidroelectrica ne Termoelectrica imeli možnosti prekiniti pogodbo.
The Romanian market is interconnected with, notably, Bulgaria, with 400 MW net transfer capacity in 2009-2010 and Hungary, with 500-800 MW net transfer capacity in 2009-2010.
V pogodbi s podjetjem Electrocentrale Deva sta imeli podjetji Hidroelectrica in Electrocentrale Deva možnost prekiniti pogodbo v naslednjih okoliščinah: (i) padec kakovosti druge stranke kot proizvajalca, v 5 delovnih dneh od datuma padca te kakovosti; (ii) zavrnitev katere koli stranke za sklenitev nove pogodbe ali spremembo obstoječe pogodbe v primeru spremembe gospodarskih in tehničnih okoliščin, ki so obstajale na datum njene sklenitve; (iii) v drugih zadevah, ki jih določajo veljavni zakoni ali predpisi [15].
The net capacity of interconnection with these Member States was not fully used in that period, due to congestion.
Pogodba s podjetjem Termoelectrica je vsebovala spodnje podrobnosti: (i) pogodbeno ceno vsako leto postavi romunski regulativni organ za energijo („ANRE“) na podlagi stroškov proizvodnje, ki jih utemelji podjetje Termoelectrica; (ii) podjetje Hidroelectrica kupi vso električno energijo, ki jo vsak mesec proizvede elektrarna Paroseni [16].
During the period 2009-2011, the flux of imports and exports of electricity into and from Romania were as follows: (i) in 2009, imports of electricity amounted to 676 GWh, while exports amounted to 3154 GWh (approximately 4,8 % of the all the electricity produced in Romania); (ii) in 2010, imports of electricity amounted to 943 GWh, while exports amounted to 3854 GWh (approximately 3,4 % of the all the electricity produced in Romania); (iii) in 2011, imports of electricity amounted to 1036 GWh, while exports amounted to 2942 GWh (approximately 2,8 % of all the electricity produced in Romania).
Pogodba je bila od datuma njenega podpisa do njene prekinitve s strani sodnega upravitelja spremenjena osemkrat (sedem dodatkov, ki so vsebovali prilagoditve cen) [17].
The contracts
Pogodba s podjetjem Electrocentrale Deva je vsebovala naslednje podatke: (i) pogodbeno ceno vsako leto postavi ANRE na podlagi stroškov proizvodnje, ki jih utemelji podjetje Electrocentrale Deva; (ii) če ANRE ne bi več uravnaval cen električne energije, bi se o ceni dogovorile stranke, ta pa naj ne bi bila nižja od pogodbene cene v prejšnjem letu; (iii) pogodbene stranke ne bi zaračunale nobene kazni ali drugega stroška, če prodajalec ne bi uspel dobaviti pogodbene količine električne energije ali če kupec ne bi plačal pogodbene cene [18].
The contract with Termoelectrica was concluded on 30 July 2008 [12], while the contract with Electrocentrale Deva was concluded on 9 June 2009 (collectively referred to in this Decision as ‘the Contracts’), for a duration of 10 years.
Pogodba je bila od datuma njenega podpisa do njene prekinitve s strani sodnega upravitelja spremenjena petkrat [19] (vse spremembe so vsebovale prilagoditve cen).
The Contracts were terminated by Hidroelectrica's judicial administrator Euro-Insol during Hidroelectrica's insolvency procedure, at the end of August 2012 [13].
Kljub jasnim določbam v obeh pogodbah, skladno s katerima naj bi pogodbeno ceno določil ANRE, so bile prilagoditve cen praviloma narejene po predhodnem soglasju ministrstva za gospodarstvo in trgovino razen v treh primerih [20].
By notes to the Romanian Ministry of Economy and Trade, Termoelectrica and Electrocentrale Deva requested approval from that Ministry for the signature of the Contracts, as set out in recitals 20 to 22:
Na primer, v sporočilu (nečitljiv datum) je podjetje Hidroelectrica iskalo soglasje ministrstva za gospodarstvo in trgovino za prilagoditev cen za obdobje med 1. avgustom 2009 in 31. decembrom 2009 zaradi „povišanj stroškov proizvodnje“.
On 15 July 2008 by note number 7323, Termoelectrica stated the following: ‘(…) Termoelectrica SA has analysed several methods of solving this urgent problem and the only variant with any prospect of rapid success and that does not require EU approval is the following: Signature of a long-term (10 year) contract between Termoelectrica SA and Hidroelectrica SA for the purchase of the electricity produced by generation unit no 4 of CET Paroșeni.
V istem sporočilu je bilo jasno navedeno, da je „namen sklenitve in izvedbe obeh pogodb prodati neko količino električne energije iz črnega premoga in vodne energije na konkurenčnem trgu ter tema dvema proizvajalcema termalne energije zagotoviti pogodbo, ki jo finančne institucije sprejmejo kot hipoteko pri pridobivanju dolgoročnih posojil, potrebnih za izvajanje nujnih naložb za ohranitev dovoljenj za proizvodnjo električne energije“.
The contract price will be the price for CET Paroșeni established by ANRE on the regulated market, based on the justified costs of Termoelectrica SA; and Signature with Compania Națională a Huilei Petroșani of a long-term (approx.
Podobno je v nekem drugem sporočilu podjetje Hidroelectrica iskalo soglasje ministrstva za gospodarstvo in trgovino za ohranitev cene iz leta 2009, tj. 230 RON/MWh, v obdobju med 1. januarjem 2010 in 31. marcem 2010, da bi „pridobilo prihodke, potrebne za nadaljevanje tekoče reorganizacije proizvajalca črnega premoga za proizvodnjo električne energije in proizvajalca termalne energije […]“.
10 year) contract to acquire coal.
Nadalje je po sklenitvi pogodb podjetje Hidroelectrica v sporočilu št. 6547 iz leta 2011 iskalo soglasje ministra za gospodarstvo in trgovino za prilagoditev cen za leto 2011, da bi podjetjema Termoelectrica in Electrocentrale Deva omogočilo: „pridobitev dolgoročnih posojil, potrebnih za izvajanje nujnih naložb za ohranitev dovoljenj za proizvodnjo električne energije in pridobitev prihodkov, potrebnih za reorganizacijo proizvajalca Compania Nationala a Huilei“.
For Termoelectrica SA (SE Paroșeni) and even for the Compania Națională a Huilei [14], this (…) would ensure the long-term future of the two companies located in the Jiu Valley.’
Vsa ta sporočila so tudi jasno navajala, da podjetje Hidroelectrica išče soglasje ministrstva za gospodarstvo in trgovino „za odobritev izvršnega upravljanja teh treh proizvajalcev električne energije in podpis dodatkov v zvezi z novimi cenami“.
On 27 May 2009, by note number 10855 Electrocentrale Deva, requested the following: ‘(…) In order to prevent the company from going bankrupt and to create the conditions necessary for the financing and implementation of the investments needed to continue running, we ask that you give your approval for the negotiation and conclusion of a 10-year contract between Electrocentrale Deva and Hidroelectrica București for the sale to Hidroelectrica of a quantity of electricity corresponding to an average power of 150 MW in addition to the quantity delivered on the regulated market and at a price approved by ANRE that will cover the justified production costs.’
Poleg tega se vsi dodatki k pogodbama v zvezi s prilagoditvami cen nanašajo na interna sporočila, ki jih je izdalo podjetje Hidroelectrica in odobril bodisi minister za gospodarstvo in trgovino ali državni sekretar na ministrstvu za gospodarstvo in trgovino s tremi izjemami iz uvodne izjave 26, na podlagi katerih so bile odobrene takšne prilagoditve cen [21].
The two Notes were approved by representatives of the Romanian Ministry of Economy and Trade, at the level of Minister and/or State Secretary.
Količine kupljene električne energije in povprečne cene, plačane po pogodbama med letoma 2009 in 2011, so [22]:
The Contracts state that they were concluded on the basis of those notes.
Količina (GWH)
In the contract with Termoelectrica, neither Hidroelectrica nor Termoelectrica had the possibility to terminate the contract.
Nakupna cena (RON/MWh)
In the contract with Electrocentrale Deva, both Hidroelectrica and Electrocentrale Deva had the possibility to terminate the contract in the following circumstances: (i) loss by the other party of its quality of producer, within five working days from the date when this quality was lost; (ii) refusal of either of the parties to conclude a new contract or to amend the existing contract, in the event of a change in the economic and technical circumstances existing at the date of its conclusion; (iii) in other cases stipulated by any applicable laws or regulations [15].
Romunski trg z električno energijo
The contract with Termoelectrica had the following particulars: (i) the contractual price would be established annually by the Romanian Energy Regulatory Authority (‘ANRE’) based on the costs of production justified by Termoelectrica; (ii) Hidroelectrica would buy all the electricity produced by Paroseni Plant each month [16].
V Romuniji se trgovanje z električno energijo pretežno odvija na dveh trgih: (i) organizirani trg z električno energijo, na katerem se trguje z električno energijo na podlagi reguliranih tarif in pogojev ter (ii) konkurenčni trg z električno energijo, na katerem se z električno energijo trguje prosto, vključno z dvema glavnima vrstama pogodb: razmeroma standardne dvostranske pogodbe, s katerimi se trguje na centraliziranem trgu, in prosto dogovorjene dvostranske pogodbe, t. i. trg za neposredno dogovorjene pogodbe.
From the date of its signature and until its termination by the judicial administrator, the contract was modified eight times (seven addendums consisted of price adjustments) [17].
Organizirani trg z električno energijo
The contract with Electrocentrale Deva had the following particulars: (i) the contractual price would be established by ANRE based on the costs of production justified by Electocentrale Deva; (ii) if ANRE no longer regulated electricity prices, the price was to be negotiated by the parties and was not to be lower than the contractual price in the previous year; (iii) the contractual parties would not charge any penalty or any other charge in the event if the seller failed to supply the contractual quantity of electricity or the buyer failed to pay the contractual price [18].
Transakcije na organiziranem trgu z električno energijo se izvajajo s kupoprodajnimi okvirnimi sporazumi, sklenjenimi med proizvajalci električne energije, ki delujejo na organiziranem trgu, vključno s podjetjem Hidroelectrica, in „dobavitelji zadnje instance“, ki zagotavljajo distribucijo električne energije končnemu uporabniku.
From the date of its signature and until its termination by the judicial administrator, the contract was modified five times [19] (all changes consisted of price adjustments).
Upravičeni odjemalci kupujejo električno energijo po reguliranih tarifah.
Despite clear provisions in both Contracts, according to which the contractual price was to be established by ANRE, as a rule, in practice the price adjustments were made upon prior approval of the Ministry of Economy and Trade, with three exceptions [20].
Na organiziranem trgu ANRE vsako leto predhodno določi cene in količine, ki naj bi jih dobavili proizvajalci električne energije.
For instance, through note (date illegible), Hidroelectrica sought approval from the Ministry of the Economy and Trade for the adjustment of the prices for the period 1 August 2009 — 31 December 2009, due to ‘increases of the production costs’.
Do obdobja 2009–2010, ko sta se začeli izvajati pogodbi, ki sta predmet preiskave, je bilo na organiziranem trgu prodano in kupljeno od 56 % do 61 % električne energije, porabljene v Romuniji.
In the same note, it is clearly mentioned that the ‘purpose of the conclusion and the performance of the two contracts is to sell in the competitive market an amount of hard coal based electricity mixed with hydropower, and also to provide the two thermal power producers with a contract accepted by the financial institutions as a mortgage, in order to obtain long-term loans necessary to make the investments required to maintain the electricity generation licences’.
Konkurenčni trg z električno energijo