natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Council of State stated in its decision that it was apparent from the evidence on record that communication costs of around EUR 800000, which, according to the applicants (Air France and Britair), should have been charged only to Terminal mp2, had in fact been charged in full to overheads and were therefore split between the terminals according to a formula that had not been proven as being vitiated by a manifest error of assessment.
Ti znižanji se odobrita samo za novo povezavo, ki izpolnjuje naslednje pogoje [14]:
The Council of State therefore confirmed the passenger charges for Terminal mp1.
leti na novi progi se morajo opravljati na letališče, na katero se ob odprtju proge ne opravljajo redni leti;
In the same decision, the Council of State annulled the landing charge for 2009 on the ground that it covered nearly three times the costs of providing this service and accounted for over a quarter of the total revenue from the airport charges.
leti na novi progi se morajo opravljati na letališče, ki je najmanj 75 km oddaljeno od letališča, na katero se že opravljajo leti ali katerega gravitacijsko območje se bistveno razlikuje od gravitacijskega območja letališča, na katero se že opravljajo leti;
It did not therefore allow for limited offsetting between the revenue from this charge and the revenue from other charges, as required by national law [11].
destinacija nove proge ne sme biti v radiju 160 km od destinacije, na katero je v zadnjih dvanajstih mesecih lete opravljala sama družba, ena od njenih hčerinskih družb, družba, ki pripada isti skupini ali je zavezana s poslovnimi sporazumi (zlasti franšiza, skupna oznaka na navedeni destinaciji itd.);
Lastly, the Council of State noted that the applicants had withdrawn their request for annulment of the traffic development incentive measures.
na progi se mora najmanj dva meseca zaporedoma opraviti vsaj en let na teden;
On 15 December 2010 Air France lodged an application with the Council of State seeking annulment of the CCIMP's decision of December 2010, which renewed the previous charges as from 1 July 2011.
če bi se v obdobju, v katerem je podjetje za zračni prevoz zaradi opravljanja letov na določeno destinacijo upravičeno do zgoraj navedenih znižanj, eno ali več drugih podjetij odločilo, da bo opravljalo lete na isto destinacijo, bodo ta upravičena do istega ukrepa v časovnem okviru, opredeljenem za prvo podjetje.
Air France eventually withdrew in 2011 all its actions brought at national level.
Znižanja pristojbin so bila odobrena letalskim prevoznikom, ki so leteli s terminala mp1 in terminala mp2.
Throughout the period, the charges for Terminal mp2 were 57 % to 66 % lower for national traffic and 66 % to 80 % lower for intra-EU flights [12] compared with the charges for Halls 1-4, respectively for national traffic, intra-EU traffic and international traffic.
Družba Air France ter njeni hčerinski družbi Britair in Regional so nato pri Conseil d'État vložile ničnostno tožbo zoper sklep zbornice CCIMP, s katerim so bile določene stopnje pristojbin za leti 2008 in 2009, ki so vključevale letališke pristojbine za letalske dejavnosti, pa tudi sistem spodbud za odprtje novih prog.
REDUCED PASSENGER CHARGES FOR NATIONAL FLIGHTS
Skupaj s to ničnostno tožbo je bil vložen tudi predlog za izdajo začasne odredbe, ki mu je sodnik za začasne odredbe pri Conseil d'État s sklepom z dne 28. julija 2009 delno ugodil in med drugim odredil začasno prekinitev tega sistema spodbud.
The passenger charges applicable for passengers departing from Halls 1-4 at the airport have traditionally differed according to the destination of flights, with one charge for national flights, one charge for flights to destinations within the European Union, and one charge for international flights.
Conseil d'État je v meritorni odločbi z dne 27. julija 2011 [15] ugotovilo, da tožeče družbe odstopajo od svojih predlogov za razveljavitev spodbujevalnih ukrepov za razvoj prometa za leti 2009 in 2010.
The charges were significantly lower for national flights, with a difference of over 50 %.
Višina uporabljenega znižanja je:
Following a complaint by Ryanair, infringement proceedings were initiated.
60 % v prvem letu obratovanja;
France informed the Commission in its note of 2 August 2007 that it had ‘reminded the operator on numerous occasions that it must end the difference between charges according to the destination of flights as this could not be justified by a difference in costs’.
45 % v drugem letu obratovanja in
New charges were adopted for 2006 and 2007 and the differentiation in question was abandoned for the future.
20 % v tretjem letu obratovanja.
REDUCTION OF CERTAIN AIRPORT CHARGES IN CONNECTION WITH THE CREATION OF NEW ROUTES
Ta znižanja se odobrijo samo za novo povezavo, ki izpolnjuje naslednje pogoje: [16]
To encourage the creation of new routes or improvements in flight schedules, preferential charging conditions can be granted to airlines.
upravičeni so potniški in tovorni leti;
This discount applies to the landing, lighting and parking charges for passenger flights and to the landing and lighting charges for cargo flights.
na novi progi se mora najmanj štiri mesece zaporedoma opraviti vsaj en let na teden;
An initial arrangement for the reduction of airport charges was introduced by the CCIMP by decision of 7 September 2004 and came into force on 1 March 2005.
leti na novi progi se morajo opravljati na letališče, ki je najmanj 50 km oddaljeno od letališča, na katero se že opravljajo leti ali katerega gravitacijsko območje se bistveno razlikuje od gravitacijskega območja letališča, na katero se že opravljajo leti;
This arrangement was applied until 31 July 2009.
V primeru sezonske ustavitve letov se bo postopek degresivnih spodbud nadaljeval od trenutka ponovnega opravljanje letov na progi, tako kot da ni bil nikoli začasno prekinjen: obdobje prekinitve je vključeno v obdobje znižanja.
The discount applied was 90 % in the first year of operation and 50 % in the second year.
Ta spodbujevalni ukrep se na letališču Marseille Provence uporablja za oba terminala in vse letalske prevoznike.
These discounts were only granted for a new route meeting the following conditions [14].
BREZPLAČNO NOČNO PARKIRANJE
the new route had to be operated to an airport without a regular service when the route was created;
dejavnost prevoza potnikov;
the new route had to be operated to an airport at least 75 km away from an airport already served or with a substantially different catchment area from that of an airport already served;
pet letov na teden na isto destinacijo najmanj v eni sezoni IATA;
the route's destination could not be within a 160 km radius of a destination served during the previous 12 months by the same airline, one of its subsidiaries, an airline belonging to the same group or an airline connected by commercial agreements (in particular franchise, code-sharing to said destination, etc.);
zrakoplovi so parkirani najmanj šest zaporednih ur med 22. in 6. uro.
the route had to be operated at least once a week for a minimum of two consecutive months;
FINANCIRANJE DEJAVNOSTI TRŽENJA
during the period that an airline was benefiting from the above reductions due to operating to a given destination, if one or more other airlines decided to operate a route to this same destination, the latter would benefit from the same measure for the same timescale as that set for the first airline.
Zbornica CCIMP je s sklepom z dne 21. novembra 2005 uvedla finančni sistem spodbud za odprtje novih prog na podlagi delnega prevzema posebnih stroškov trženja in promocije na nosilcih, ki jih je odobrilo letališče Marseille Provence.
The discounts were granted to airlines operating from both Terminal mp1 and Terminal mp2.
Na podlagi tega sistema je moral upravičeni letalski prevoznik predložiti utemeljitev stroškov za promocijo te proge.
In a judgment of 30 June 2009, Marseille Administrative Court allowed Air France's application seeking annulment of the charge reduction arrangement adopted in 2005.
Znesek pomoči ni smel presegati 50 % utemeljenih stroškov.
The CCIMP did not appeal against this judgment as, in the meantime, the incentive arrangement had been partly renewed based on a new charging decision.
Odločitev o uvedbi podpore za trženje je bila brez predhodne odobritve Francije sprejeta pred objavo Sporočila Komisije – Smernice Skupnosti o financiranju letališč in zagonski državni pomoči letalskim družbam z odhodi z regionalnih letališč (v nadaljnjem besedilu: smernice iz leta 2005) [17].
Air France and its subsidiaries Britair et Regional then lodged an action for annulment with the Council of State against the CCIMP's decision setting the charges for 2008 and 2009, which included not only the aeronautical charges but also the arrangement incentivising the creation of new routes.
Francija je z dopisom z dne 22. avgusta 2006 zbornico CCIMP pozvala, naj podporo ukine najpozneje 1. junija 2007, ker je menila, da taka podpora za trženje ne izpolnjuje meril iz smernic iz leta 2005.
This action for annulment was accompanied by an interim application for suspension, which the Council of State, in an interim ruling of 28 July 2009, partly allowed by ordering, in particular, the suspension of this incentive arrangement.
Zbornica CCIMP je potrdila, da prvotno predvidena udeležba pri stroških trženja ni bila izvedena, razen udeležbe [nižje od 300000 EUR]* v korist družbe BMI Baby.
In its decision on the main action of 27 July 2011 [15], the Council of State noted that the applicants had withdrawn their requests for annulment of the traffic development incentive measures for 2009 and 2010.
POGODBA O NAKUPU OGLAŠEVALSKEGA PROSTORA Z DRUŽBO AMS
From 1 February 2010 to 31 October 2011, the new discount in the landing, lighting and parking charges was applied to the benefit of all airlines meeting the objective conditions for this to be granted.
Zbornica CCIMP je 19. maja 2006 brez postopka zbiranja ponudb in predhodnega obvestila za pet let sklenila pogodbo o nakupu oglaševalskega prostora z družbo Airport Marketing Services (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba AMS), hčerinsko družbo v 100-odstotni lasti družbe Ryanair.
The discount applied was:
Glede na določila te pogodbe bi morala zbornica CCIMP družbi AMS plačevati:
45 % in the second year of operation; and
[…]* EUR na mesec od novembra 2007 do maja 2008;
20 % in the third year of operation.
[…]* EUR na mesec od junija 2008.
These discounts were only granted for a new route meeting the following conditions [16]:
V sklepu odbora Cocoéco z dne 18. februarja 2009 za določitev stopenj, ki so predmet sklepa z dne 25. maja 2009, je pojasnjeno, da „je strošek pogodbe z družbo AMS v obdobju pogodbe, tj. od oktobra 2006 do oktobra 2011, […]* EUR, kar pomeni […]* EUR na leto“.
passenger fights and cargo flights were eligible;
Tudi na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila Francija, je mogoče določiti strošek pogodbe z družbo AMS, kot je opredeljen v preglednici 2.
the new route had to be operated at least once a week for a minimum of four consecutive months;
Preglednica 2
the new route had to be operated to an airport at least 50 km away from an airport already served or with a substantially different catchment area from that of an airport already served;
Stroški, povezani s pogodbo z družbo AMS, glede na informacije, ki jih je predložila Francija, v tisoč EUR
the new route could not have been operated during the previous 18 months by the same airline, one of its subsidiaries, an airline belonging to the same group or an airline connected by commercial agreements.
Po navedbah zbornice CCIMP naj bi bil predmet pogodbe oglaševanje destinacije Marseille, da bi se privabilo veliko število potnikov.
In the event of seasonal suspension, the discount was re-applied when the route's operation resumed, as if it had never been suspended: the period of interruption was included in the discount period.
S tem naj bi se zagotovili trajnost terminala mp2 in ustrezna raven plačila za storitve, ki jih ponuja upravljavec letališča.
This incentive measure applied to both terminals and all airlines at Marseille Provence Airport.
V zvezi s tem zbornica CCIMP meni, da je doseganje tega cilja odvisno od dveh dejavnikov:
FREE OVERNIGHT PARKING
velikega števila uporabnikov interneta;
In its submission of 28 December 2010, the CCIMP mentions the introduction of the ‘waived overnight parking charge’ measure as from 1 February 2010.
evropskih uporabnikov interneta, ki so dovzetni za nizkocenovni model.
As a result, parking between 22.00 and 06.00 is free under the following conditions:
Zbornica CCIMP utemeljuje sklenitev te pogodbe z družbo AMS z dejstvom, da je leta 2006 samo spletno mesto te družbe ustrezalo potrebam zbornice CCIMP, saj je ponujalo naslednje storitve:
passenger transport activity;
edinstven in ekskluziven sistem trženja vozovnic družbe Ryanair, edinega prevoznika, ki se je obvezal, da bo na novem terminalu mp2 vzpostavil pomembno bazo zrakoplovov;
five weekly frequencies to the same destination during a minimum IATA season;
širok krog uporabnikov interneta, na katere je usmerjena promocijska politika zbornice CCIMP;
aircraft parking for at least six consecutive hours between 22.00 and 06.00.
storitve trženja, prilagojene nakupu letalskih vozovnic za destinacijo Provansa.
FINANCING OF MARKETING ACTIVITIES
Pritožnica pa meni, da ta pogodba, sklenjena z družbo AMS, pomeni pomoč za družbo Ryanair, da bi jo privabila na letališče Marseille Provence.
By decision of 21 November 2005, the CCIMP introduced a financial incentive arrangement for the creation of new routes by partly paying the specific marketing and promotional costs incurred for media approved by Marseille Provence Airport.
V podporo svojemu stališču je predložila dokaze, ki temeljijo na gradivu za pripravo na sestanek „odbora za letališče“ zbornice CCIMP 15. novembra 2005.
Under this arrangement, the beneficiary airline had to provide proof of the expenditure on promoting this route.
POSLOVNI NAČRT ZA TERMINAL MP2 IN UPORABA NAČELA PREUDARNEGA UDELEŽENCA V TRŽNEM GOSPODARSTVU
The aid amount could not exceed 50 % of the proven expenditure.
Zbornica CCIMP je novembra 2004 izdelala poslovni načrt, da bi dokazala donosnost terminala mp2.
The decision to introduce a ‘marketing’ payment was made, without prior authorisation by France, before the publication of the Communication from the Commission — Community guidelines on financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports (‘the 2005 Guidelines’) [17].
V poslovnem načrtu, ki ga je predložila Francija, se za obdobje 2004–2020 primerjata scenarij s terminalom mp2 in scenarij brez terminala mp2.
By letter of 22 August 2006, France asked the CCIMP to end this arrangement no later than 1 June 2007 on the basis that this type of ‘marketing’ payment did not meet the criteria laid down by the 2005 Guidelines.
Po navedbah Francije za obdobje 2004–2020 vsota letnih denarnih tokov in čiste knjigovodske vrednosti v letu 2020 znaša:
The CCIMP confirmed that the marketing expenditure contribution initially envisaged had not been applied, except for one contribution [of less than EUR 300000]* to bmibaby.
[…]* milijonov EUR v scenariju brez terminala mp2;
AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE ADVERTISING SPACE WITH AMS
[…]* milijonov EUR v scenariju s terminalom mp2.
On 19 May 2006 the CCIMP concluded, for a term of five years, without prior publicity or competitive tendering, an agreement to purchase advertising space with the company Airport Marketing Services (‘AMS’), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the airline Ryanair.
Francija torej ugotavlja, da je scenarij s terminalom mp2 za […]* milijonov EUR ugodnejši od scenarija brez terminala mp2, kar naj bi ustrezalo stopnji donosa v višini […]* %.
According to the provisions of this agreement, the CCIMP was to pay AMS:
Poslovni načrt vsebuje tudi analizo občutljivosti za različne predpostavke prometa in stopenj letaliških pristojbin.
EUR […]* per month between November 2006 and October 2007,
Preučena scenarija „prometa“ sta bila scenarij „brez prenosa redne proge družbe Air France“ in scenarij „z manjšo rastjo prometa na terminalu mp2“.
EUR […]* per month between November 2007 and May 2008,
Preučena scenarija „stopenj pristojbin“ sta bila scenarij s stopnjami v višini […]* EUR in scenarij s stopnjami v višini […]* EUR na potnika za terminal mp2.
EUR […]* per month from June 2008.
Leta 2005 je bil poslovni načrt posodobljen.
It was indicated in the Cocoéco decision of 18 February 2009 on the charges that were set in the decision of 25 May 2009 that ‘the cost of the AMS agreement over the agreed term, i.e. October 2006-October 2011, is EUR […]*, i.e. EUR […]* per year’.
Ob tej priložnosti so bili predvideni trije scenariji.
The information provided by France also allows the cost of the AMS agreement to be determined, as indicated in Table 2:
Ti scenariji so:
Table 2
druga simulacija: notranja stopnja donosa je določena na 7,5 % in ugotavlja se, kakšnemu številu potnikov ustreza ta notranja stopnja donosa.
Costs of the AMS agreement according to the information provided by France (EUR '000)
S simulacijo se ugotovi, da bi lahko bilo število potnikov v obdobju 2007–2021 za 1,32 milijona nižje v primerjavi s prvo simulacijo;
According to the CCIMP, the objective of this agreement was to publicise Marseille as a destination in order to attract high passenger numbers.
tretja simulacija: če promet terminala mp2 v letu 2010 znaša samo 1 milijon potnikov (namesto 1,65 milijona, upoštevanega v prvi simulaciji), kakšno višjo stopnjo bo treba uporabiti na potnika od leta 2011, da se ohrani 7,5-odstotna notranja raven donosa?
In this respect, the CCIMP considered that the pursuit of this objective relied on a combination of two factors:
Ocene, ki jih je na zahtevo družbe Air France v okviru postopkov pred Conseil d'État opravila družba PwC, se nanašajo na simulacije iz februarja 2005, septembra 2005 in maja 2006, ki jih je izdelala zbornica CCIMP ter katerih namen je določiti notranjo raven donosa in čisto sedanjo vrednost (ČSV) projekta terminala mp2 na podlagi pričakovanih denarnih tokov.
a high volume of internet users;
Družba PwC je ob tem izrazila več pripomb in kritik v zvezi z zadevnimi poslovnimi načrti.
European internet users open to the low-cost model.
PRIPOMBE FRANCIJE
The CCIMP justifies the conclusion of this agreement with AMS by the fact that only the latter's website met the CCIMP's needs in 2006, as it offered the following services:
NEKATERE DODELJENE SUBVENCIJE SO ZASTARALE
a unique and exclusive Ryanair ticket marketing system, with Ryanair being the only operator to undertake to establish a significant aircraft base at the new Terminal mp2;
Francija izpodbija stališče Komisije, v skladu s katerim 7,577 milijona EUR, ki so bili med letoma 2005 in 2007 dodeljeni za izgradnjo terminala mp2, in 16 milijonov EUR, ki so bili od leta 2001 dodeljeni za naložbe na letališču, v celoti pomenijo državno pomoč, ki je lahko predmet analize Komisije.
a large audience of internet users targeted by the CCIMP's promotional policy;
Francija v skladu s členom 15 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 [18] trdi, da so naslednje subvencije, navedene v preglednici 3, zastarale.
marketing services appropriate to the purchase of flight tickets to Provence as a destination.
Preglednica 3
The complainant takes the view that this agreement concluded with AMS represents aid to Ryanair in order to attract the latter to Marseille Provence Airport.
Organ
In this respect, it provides evidence in support of its position, based on the preparatory dossier for the CCIMP ‘airport advisory committee’ meeting on 15 November 2005.
Datum in podpis pogodbe
BUSINESS PLAN FOR TERMINAL MP2 AND APPLICATION OF THE MARKET ECONOMY OPERATOR PRINCIPLE
Namen subvencije
This plan was updated in 2005.
Generalni svet
Further updates of this business plan were assessed by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) at the request of Air France in February 2005, November 2005 and May 2006.
14. december 1999
The business plan submitted by France compares, for the 2004-2020 period, a scenario with Terminal mp2 and a scenario without Terminal mp2.
Razširitev in prestrukturiranje letaliških objektov
According to France, the total of the annual cash flows for the 2004-2020 period and the net book value in 2020 are:
Regionalni svet
EUR […]* million in the scenario without Terminal mp2;
24. oktober 1997
EUR […]* million in the scenario with Terminal mp2.
Razširitev in razvoj letališča
France therefore concludes that the scenario with Terminal mp2 is EUR […]* million more beneficial than the scenario without Terminal mp2, which would correspond to a rate of return of […]* %.
8. julij 1994
The business plan also contains a sensitivity analysis for different traffic and charging assumptions.
Ureditev tovornega območja
The ‘traffic’ scenarios studied were a scenario ‘without transfer of the Air France shuttle’ and a ‘lower growth in Terminal mp2 traffic’ scenario.
država
The ‘charging’ scenarios studied involved charges of EUR […]* and EUR […]* per passenger for Terminal mp2.
26. april 2000
The business plan was updated in 2005.
Uskladitev znakov za obveznost in obvestila s standardi
On this occasion, three scenarios were simulated as follows:
23. junij 1999
First simulation: the 2005 traffic forecasts became the basis for the calculations, transfer of the Air France shuttle to Terminal mp2 was no longer included in the base scenario, and the calculations were made for the 2005-2021 period.
Varnostni pregledi oddane prtljage
Based on these assumptions, the internal rate of return was put at [in excess of 7,5 %]*.
Francija trdi, da zastarane subvencije ne morejo biti predmet sklepa o vračilu pomoči in da so zato nujno izključene s področja preiskave Komisije.
Second simulation: the internal rate of return was set at 7,5 % and the number of passengers corresponding to this internal rate of return was calculated.
NEKATERE OD DODELJENIH SUBVENCIJ SO BILE NAMENJENE FINANCIRANJU NEGOSPODARSKIH DEJAVNOSTI IN INFRASTRUKTURE, ZATO NE POMENIJO DRŽAVNE POMOČI
The simulation concluded that the number of passengers over the 2007-2021 period could be 1,32 million less than in the first simulation.
Francija trdi, da so bile nekatere subvencije namenjene financiranju infrastrukture ali dejavnosti, povezanih z izvajanjem pristojnosti v zvezi z javno varnostjo, požarno varnostjo in varnostjo obratovanja, in sicer:
Third simulation: if Terminal mp2 traffic in 2010 was only 1 million passengers (instead of the 1,65 million used in the first simulation), what additional charges would have to be applied per passenger from 2011 to maintain an internal rate of return of 7,5 %?
subvencija, ki jo je država dodelila 19. decembra 2001, kolikor je bil njen namen okrepiti sistem varnosti v zračnem prometu ter zlasti financirati naključno preiskavo določenega deleža ročne prtljage, sistematičen pregled osebja, ki vstopa na območja omejenega gibanja, in pospešitev programa kontrole oddane prtljage, da bi v začetku drugega polletja leta 2002 dosegel 100 %, v skupnem znesku 5032000 EUR;
The simulation concluded that the charges would need to be increased by EUR […]*.
subvencija, ki jo je generalni svet dodelil 27. septembra 2002, kolikor je bil njen namen kabliranje vzletno-pristajalne steze 2, ureditev sobe za računalniško podporo, prostora za centralo TFE, obnovitev fasade tehničnega bloka prostorov za zračno navigacijo, zamenjava centrale TGBT položaja B, uskladitev alarmnega sistema terminala in požarna varnost računalniške sobe, v skupnem znesku 209885 EUR;