natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Under Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Member States that have not made use of Article 14 of the Second Council Directive 67/228/EEC [5] may exempt taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 5000.
Na podlagi člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES lahko države članice, ki niso uporabile člena 14 Druge direktive Sveta 67/228/EGS [5], izvzamejo davčne zavezance, katerih letni promet ne presega 5000 EUR.
The derogating measure derogates from Article 285 in its application to Italy only to the extent that the annual turnover threshold exceeds EUR 5000.
Ukrep o odstopanju predstavlja odstopanje od člena 285 kar zadeva Italijo samo v obsegu, kadar prag letnega prometa presega 5000 EUR.
The derogating measure is in line with the objectives of the Commission communication ‘“Think Small First” — A “Small Business Act” for Europe’ of 25 June 2008.
Ukrep o odstopanju je v skladu s cilji sporočila Komisije „Najprej pomisli na male“ – „Akt za mala podjetja“ za Evropo z dne 25. junija 2008.
Since the derogating measure has resulted in reduced VAT obligations for those smaller businesses that did not opt for the regular VAT arrangements in accordance with Article 290 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Italy should be authorised to continue to apply the derogating measure for a further limited period.
Glede na to, da je ukrep o odstopanju privedel do zmanjšanja obveznosti v zvezi z DDV za manjša podjetja, ki niso izbrala splošne ureditve za DDV v skladu s členom 290 Direktive 2006/112/ES, bi bilo treba Italiji dovoliti, da še naprej uporablja ukrep o odstopanju za nadaljnje omejeno obdobje.
Taxable persons should still be able to opt for the normal VAT arrangements.
Davčni zavezanci bi še vedno morali imeti možnost, da izberejo splošno ureditev glede DDV.
The derogating measure should be limited in time to allow an assessment as to whether it remains appropriate and effective.
Ukrep o odstopanju bi moral biti časovno omejen, da se lahko oceni, ali je ustrezen in učinkovit.
Moreover, Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC on a special scheme for small enterprises are subject to review.
Poleg tega se za člene 281 do 294 Direktive 2006/112/ES glede posebne ureditve za mala podjetja uporablja pregled.
The derogating measure should, therefore, also be subject to a sunset clause.
Zato bi se morala tudi za sam ukrep o odstopanju uporabljati klavzula ponovnega pregleda.
From information provided by Italy, the derogating measure will have a negligible impact on the overall amount of tax revenue collected at the final stage of consumption.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila Italija, bo ukrep o odstopanju imel zanemarljiv učinek na skupni znesek davčnih prihodkov, zbranih na ravni končne potrošnje.
The derogating measure has no impact on the Union's own resources accruing from VAT.
Ukrep o odstopanju ne vpliva na lastna sredstva Unije, pridobljena od DDV.
Implementing Decision 2013/678/EU should therefore be amended accordingly,
Izvedbeni sklep 2013/678/EU bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti–
Article 2 of Decision 2013/678/EU is replaced by the following:
Člen 2 Sklepa 2013/678/EU se nadomesti z naslednjim:
This Decision shall apply until the entry into force of a directive amending Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC on a special scheme for small enterprises, or until 31 December 2019, whichever is the earlier.’.
Ta sklep se uporablja do začetka veljavnosti direktive o spremembi členov 281 do 294 Direktive 2006/112/ES glede posebne ureditve za mala podjetja ali do 31. decembra 2019, kar nastopi prej.“
Council Decision 2008/737/EC of 15 September 2008 authorising the Italian Republic to apply a measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 249, 18.9.2008, p. 13).
Odločba Sveta 2008/737/ES z dne 15. septembra 2008 o dovoljenju Italijanski republiki, da uporabi ukrep, ki odstopa od člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost (UL L 249, 18.9.2008, str. 13).
Council Implementing Decision 2010/688/EU of 15 October 2010 authorising the Italian Republic to continue to apply a special measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 294, 12.11.2010, p. 12).
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2010/688/EU z dne 15. oktobra 2010 o dovoljenju Italijanski republiki, da še naprej uporablja posebni ukrep, ki odstopa od člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost (UL L 294, 12.11.2010, str. 12).
Council Implementing Decision 2013/678/EU of 15 November 2013 authorising the Italian Republic to continue to apply a special measure derogating from Article 285 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 316, 27.11.2013, p. 35).
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2013/678/EU z dne 15. novembra 2013 o dovoljenju Italijanski republiki, da še naprej uporablja posebni ukrep, ki odstopa od člena 285 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost (UL L 316, 27.11.2013, str. 35).
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1989
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/1989
setting out a recommendation for prolonging temporary internal border control in exceptional circumstances putting the overall functioning of the Schengen area at risk
o priporočilu za podaljšanje začasnega nadzora na notranjih mejah v izrednih okoliščinah, ki ogrožajo splošno delovanje schengenskega območja
Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) [1], and in particular Article 29 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) 2016/399 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 2016 o Zakoniku Unije o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah) [1], in zlasti člena 29 Uredbe,
In accordance with Article 29 of the Schengen Borders Code, the Council adopted on 12 May 2016 an Implementing Decision setting out a recommendation for temporary internal border control in exceptional circumstances putting the overall functioning of the Schengen area at risk.
Svet je 12. maja 2016 v skladu s členom 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah sprejel Izvedbeni sklep o priporočilu za začasni nadzor na notranjih mejah v izrednih okoliščinah, ki ogrožajo splošno delovanje schengenskega območja.
The Council recommended to five Schengen States (Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway) to maintain proportionate temporary border controls for a maximum period of 6 months as from the day of adoption of the Implementing Decision, to address the serious threat to public policy or internal security posed in these States by the combination of deficiencies in external border control in Greece and the secondary movements of irregular migrants entering via Greece and who intend to move to other Schengen States.
Priporočilo petim schengenskim državam (Avstriji, Nemčiji, Danski, Švedski in Norveški) omogoča ohranitev sorazmernega začasnega nadzora meje za največ šest mesecev od dneva sprejetja izvedbenega sklepa, in sicer za obravnavanje resne grožnje javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, ki jo v teh državah predstavlja kombinacija pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru zunanjih meja v Grčiji in sekundarnih gibanj migrantov brez urejenega statusa, ki vstopajo v Grčijo in se nameravajo gibati v druge schengenske države.
On 28 September 2016, the Commission issued its Report on the implementation of the Implementing Decision.
Komisija je 28. septembra 2016 objavila poročilo o izvajanju izvedbenega sklepa.
It concluded that the internal border controls carried out by Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway have been proportionate and in line with the Council recommendation.
Ugotovila je, da je nadzor na notranjih mejah, ki ga izvajajo Avstrija, Nemčija, Danska, Švedska in Norveška, sorazmeren in v skladu s priporočilom Sveta.
The Commission further concluded that, based on the information available and the reports received from the States concerned, it saw no need for proposing amendments to the Implementing Decision at the time of reporting.
Poleg tega se Komisiji na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij in poročil, prejetih od zadevnih držav, v času poročanja ni zdelo potrebno predlagati sprememb izvedbenega sklepa.
On 18 and 21 October 2016, the Schengen States concerned reported for the second time to the Commission on the implementation of the Council recommendation.
Zadevne schengenske države so 18. in 21. oktobra 2016 drugič poročale Komisiji o izvajanju priporočila Sveta.
The information provided follows a trend similar to the data provided for the first report (reduction in the number of persons to whom entry is refused, as well as in the number of asylum applications received) and thus shows a progressive stabilisation of the situation.
Predložene informacije kažejo podoben trend kot podatki za prvo poročilo (zmanjšanje števila oseb, ki jim je zavrnjen vstop, pa tudi števila prejetih prošenj za azil), kar pomeni postopno stabilizacijo razmer.
However, despite a sharp drop in the number of arrivals of irregular migrants and asylum-seekers in the European Union, an important number of irregular migrants still remains in Greece as well as in the Member States most affected by the secondary movements of irregular migrants coming from Greece.
Kljub močnemu upadu števila prihodov migrantov brez urejenega statusa in prosilcev za azil v Evropsko unijo, pa je v Grčiji in tudi v državah članicah, ki so najbolj prizadete zaradi sekundarnih gibanj migrantov brez urejenega statusa, ki prihajajo iz Grčije, še vedno veliko migrantov brez urejenega statusa.
Based on the trends observed in the past, it is justified to expect that these persons may want to move irregularly to other Member States when the border checks, which hinder their secondary movement, are lifted.
Na podlagi trendov, ki so bili opaženi v preteklosti, je upravičeno pričakovati, da se bodo te osebe morda neregularno gibale v druge države članice, ko bodo mejne kontrole, ki ovirajo njihovo sekundarno gibanje, odpravljene.
The cumulated number of asylum applications received since the beginning of the migratory crisis and the still incoming applications have put an important strain on the national administrations and services in all EU Member States and specifically in the Schengen States concerned by the Implementing Decision.
Skupno število prošenj za azil, prejetih od začetka migracijske krize, in prošenj, ki še vedno prihajajo, pomembno vpliva na nacionalne uprave in službe v vseh državah članicah EU, še posebej pa v schengenskih državah, ki jih zadeva izvedbeni sklep.
Internal border controls cannot be viewed in isolation from other important factors.
Nadzora na notranjih mejah ni mogoče obravnavati ločeno od drugih pomembnih dejavnikov.
In its communication ‘Back to Schengen — A Roadmap’ [2], the Commission identified the different policies to be put in place to return to a fully functioning Schengen Area.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu „Vrnitev k schengenski ureditvi – časovni načrt“ [2] opredelila različne politike, ki jih je treba uvesti za vrnitev k popolnoma delujočemu schengenskemu območju.
The roadmap notably included the adoption and the implementation of the European Border and Coast Guard.
Časovni načrt vključuje zlasti sprejetje in izvajanje evropske mejne in obalne straže.
Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2016 on the European Border and Coast Guard [3] entered into force on 6 October 2016, within a 9 months' time frame since the presentation of the Commission proposal, showing the commitment of all actors involved.
Uredba (EU) 2016/1624 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. septembra 2016 o evropski mejni in obalni straži [3] je začela veljati 6. oktobra 2016, tj. v roku devetih mesecev od predstavitve predloga Komisije, kar kaže na zavezanost vseh sodelujočih akterjev.
It is expected that the rapid reaction pools, covering both human resources and technical equipment, and the rapid return pools will be established and operational by, respectively, 7 December 2016 and 7 January 2017.
Pričakuje se, da bosta nabor za hitri odziv, ki zajema tako človeške vire kot tehnično opremo, in nabor za hitro vračanje vzpostavljena in postala operativna do 7. decembra 2016 oziroma 7. januarja 2017.
Another element identified in the ‘Back to Schengen’ roadmap is the successful implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement.
Drug element iz časovnega načrta „Vrnitev k schengenski ureditvi“ je uspešno izvajanje izjave EU in Turčije.
While the implementation of the Statement, as set out in the third progress report [4], continues to deliver results, it is important to continue to ensure that the Statement functions on a sustained basis.
Čeprav izvajanje izjave še naprej daje dobre rezultate, kot je navedeno v tretjem poročilu o napredku [4], je pomembno nadaljnje zagotavljanje trajnostnega delovanja izjave.
Moreover, there remains an ongoing need for the cooperation agreed upon in the Statement of the Western Balkans Route Leaders meeting.
Poleg tega obstaja stalna potreba po sodelovanju, dogovorjenem v izjavi, ki je bila sprejeta na srečanju voditeljev držav vzdolž zahodnobalkanske poti.
It follows from the above that despite the steady and important progress in the fields identified by the ‘Back to Schengen’ roadmap and a progressive stabilisation of the situation, these actions still need time to be fully implemented and the corresponding results to be confirmed.
Iz navedenega izhaja, da je pri teh ukrepih kljub stalnemu in pomembnemu napredku na področjih, opredeljenih v časovnem načrtu „Vrnitev k schengenski ureditvi“, ter postopni stabilizaciji razmer še vedno potreben čas, da se bodo v celoti izvajali, zadevni rezultati pa potrdili.
Exceptional circumstances constituting a serious threat to public policy and internal security and putting at risk the overall functioning of the Schengen area therefore still persist.
Zato izredne okoliščine, ki pomenijo resno grožnjo javnemu redu in notranji varnosti ter ogrožajo splošno delovanje schengenskega območja, še vedno obstajajo.
Given the current fragile situation in Greece and the residue of pressure remaining in the Member States most affected by the secondary movements of irregular migrants coming from Greece, it therefore appears justified to allow a proportionate prolongation of the temporary internal border controls by the Schengen States currently carrying out such controls as a last resort measure in response to a serious threat to their public policy or internal security, namely Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and the associated country Norway, in accordance with Article 29 of the Schengen Borders Code.
Glede na trenutne nestabilne razmere v Grčiji in preostali pritisk v državah članicah, ki so najbolj prizadete zaradi sekundarnih gibanj migrantov brez urejenega statusa, ki prihajajo iz Grčije, se zato zdi upravičeno, da se schengenskim državam, ki trenutno izvajajo začasni nadzor na notranjih mejah kot skrajni ukrep v odziv na resno grožnjo javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, in sicer Avstriji, Nemčiji, Danski, Švedski in pridruženi državi Norveški, v skladu s členom 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah dovoli sorazmerno podaljšanje takega nadzora.
Based on the factual indicators available at this stage, this prolongation should not exceed 3 months as from the date of adoption of the present Implementing Decision.
Na podlagi dejanskih trenutno razpoložljivih kazalnikov to podaljšanje ne bi smelo presegati treh mesecev od datuma sprejetja tega izvedbenega sklepa.
The Member States that decide to continue carrying out internal border control following the present Implementing Decision should notify the other Member States, the European Parliament and the Commission accordingly.
Države članice, ki bi se odločile za nadaljevanje izvajanja nadzora na notranjih mejah na podlagi tega izvedbenega sklepa, bi morale o tem uradno obvestiti druge države članice, Evropski parlament in Komisijo.
Before opting for such controls, the Member States concerned should examine whether other measures alternative to border controls could not be used to effectively remedy the identified threat.
Preden se odločijo za tak nadzor, bi morale zadevne države članice proučiti, ali bi lahko za učinkovito odpravo ugotovljene grožnje uporabile alternativne ukrepe nadzoru meje.
The Member States concerned should inform of the outcome of this reflection and the reasons for opting for border controls in their notifications.
Zadevne države članice bi morale v svojih obvestilih navesti izid tega premisleka in razloge za odločitev za nadzor meje.
As stated in the European Council conclusions on migration of 20 October 2016, the process of getting ‘Back to Schengen’ entails adjusting the temporary internal border controls to reflect the current needs.
Kot je navedeno v sklepih Evropskega sveta o migracijah z dne 20. oktobra 2016, proces vrnitve k schengenski ureditvi vsebuje prilagoditev začasnega nadzora na notranjih mejah trenutnim potrebam.
The controls under the present Implementing Decision should be carried out only to the necessary extent, limited in their intensity to the absolute minimum necessary.
Nadzor na podlagi tega izvedbenega sklepa bi bilo treba izvajati le, kolikor je to potrebno, intenzivnost nadzora pa omejiti na nujno potreben minimum.
For example, when during a given period there is an insignificant flow, controls at certain border sections may then not even be necessary.
Na primer, kadar v določenem obdobju ni velikega pritoka, nadzor na določenih odsekih meje morda sploh ni potreben.
In order to impede as little as possible the crossing of the relevant internal borders for the general public, only targeted, risk analysis and intelligence based controls can take place.
Da bi bilo prehajanje zadevnih notranjih meja za širšo javnost čim manj ovirano, se lahko izvaja le ciljno usmerjen nadzor na podlagi analize tveganja in obveščevalnih podatkov.
Furthermore, the necessity of these controls at the relevant border sections should be examined and re-evaluated regularly in cooperation with all the Member States affected with the objective of progressively reducing them.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba nujnost tega nadzora na zadevnih odsekih meje redno proučevati in ocenjevati v sodelovanju z vsemi zadevnimi državami članicami, in sicer s ciljem njegovega postopnega zmanjšanja.
At the end of each month of implementation of the present Implementing Decision, a complete report on the results of the checks carried out should be sent to the Commission, together with an assessment of their continuous necessity when applicable.
Ob koncu vsakega meseca izvajanja tega izvedbenega sklepa bi bilo treba Komisiji poslati popolno poročilo o rezultatih opravljenih kontrol, skupaj z oceno nadaljnje potrebe po takih kontrolah, kadar je to ustrezno.
This report should include the total number of persons checked, the total number of refusals of entry following the checks, the total number of return decisions issued following the checks and the total number of asylum applications received at the internal borders where the checks take place.
To poročilo bi moralo vključevati skupno število kontroliranih oseb, skupno število zavrnitev vstopa po kontrolah, skupno število odločb o vrnitvi, izdanih po kontrolah, in skupno število prošenj za azil, prejetih na notranjih mejah, kjer se kontrole izvajajo.
The Council takes note that the Commission has announced that it will closely monitor the application of this Implementing Decision,
Svet je seznanjen s tem, da je Komisija napovedala, da bo pozorno spremljala izvajanje tega izvedbenega sklepa –
Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway to prolong proportionate, temporary border controls for a maximum period of three months, starting from the day of adoption of this Implementing Decision, at the following internal borders:
Avstrija, Nemčija, Danska, Švedska in Norveška naj podaljšajo sorazmerni začasni nadzor meje za obdobje največ treh mesecev z začetkom na dan sprejetja tega izvedbenega sklepa na naslednjih notranjih mejah:
Austria at the Austrian-Hungarian land border and Austrian-Slovenian land border,
Avstrija na avstrijsko-madžarski kopenski meji in avstrijsko-slovenski kopenski meji,
Germany at the German-Austrian land border;
Nemčija na nemško-avstrijski kopenski meji,
Denmark in the Danish ports with ferry connections to Germany and at the Danish-German land border,
Danska v danskih pristaniščih s trajektnimi povezavami z Nemčijo in na dansko-nemški kopenski meji,
Sweden in the Swedish harbours in the Police Region South and West and at the Öresund bridge,
Švedska v švedskih pristaniščih v južni in zahodni policijski regiji ter na mostu Öresund,
Norway in the Norwegian ports with ferry connections to Denmark, Germany and Sweden.
Norveška v norveških pristaniščih s trajektnimi povezavami z Dansko, Nemčijo in Švedsko.
Before prolonging such controls, the Member States concerned should exchange views with the relevant Member State(s) with a view to ensuring that internal border controls are carried out only where it is considered necessary and proportionate.
Zadevne države članice bi morale pred podaljšanjem takšnega nadzora izmenjati mnenja z ustreznimi državami članicami za zagotovitev, da se bo nadzor na notranjih mejah izvajal le, kjer je takšen ukrep nujen in sorazmeren.
Furthermore, the Member States concerned should ensure that internal border controls are only carried out as a last resort measure when other alternative measures cannot achieve the same effect, and only at those parts of the internal border where it is considered necessary and proportionate, in accordance with the Schengen Borders Code.
Poleg tega bi morale zadevne države članice v skladu z Zakonikom o schengenskih mejah zagotoviti, da se bo nadzor na notranjih mejah izvajal le kot skrajni ukrep, kadar z alternativnimi ukrepi ni mogoče doseči enakega učinka, in le na tistih delih notranje meje, kjer je takšen ukrep nujen in sorazmeren.
The Member States concerned should notify the other Member States, the European Parliament and the Commission accordingly.
Zadevne države članice bi morale o tem uradno obvestiti druge države članice, Evropski parlament in Komisijo.
Border control should remain targeted, based on risk analysis and intelligence, and limited in scope, frequency, location and time, to what is strictly necessary to respond to the serious threat and to safeguard public policy and internal security.
Nadzor meje bi moral na podlagi analize tveganja in obveščevalnih podatkov ostati ciljno usmerjen ter po obsegu, pogostosti, lokaciji in času omejen na to, kar je nujno potrebno za odziv na resno grožnjo ter za zaščito javnega reda in notranje varnosti.
The Member State that carries out internal border control pursuant to the present Implementing Decision should review weekly the necessity, frequency, location and time of controls, adjust the intensity of the controls to the level of the threat addressed, phasing them out wherever appropriate, and report to the Commission every month.
Država članica, ki izvaja nadzor na notranjih mejah na podlagi tega izvedbenega sklepa, bi morala vsak teden preverjati nujnost, pogostost, lokacijo in čas nadzora, intenzivnost nadzora prilagajati stopnji obravnavane grožnje, ga prenehati izvajati, kadar koli je to primerno, in vsak mesec poročati Komisiji.
OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p. 1.
UL L 77, 23.3.2016, str. 1.
OJ L 251, 16.9.2016, p. 1.
UL L 251, 16.9.2016, str. 1.
Third Report on the Progress made in the implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement (COM(2016) 634).
Tretje poročilo o napredku pri izvajanju izjave EU in Turčije (COM(2016) 634).
Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1990
Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2016/1990
of 14 November 2016
z dne 14. novembra 2016