natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, ASIC may seek orders and refer matters for proceedings to enforce its regulatory and investigative measures.
In končno, ASIC je za lažji nadzor trgov in udeležencev v skladu z MIR sklenila protokole za sodelovanje in deljenje informacij z vsakim zadevnim upravljavcem trga.
ASIC may apply to a court for an order requiring compliance with ASIC's measures taken on the basis of its regulatory and investigatory powers (s.
Zato je ustrezno zaključiti, da za finančne trge v Avstraliji veljata stalen učinkovit nadzor in izvrševanje.
70 of the ASIC Act).
Tako bi bilo treba pogoje iz člena 2a Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 v zvezi s finančnimi trgi z dovoljenjem v Avstraliji šteti za izpolnjene.
Furthermore, where an entity fails to comply with a direction issued under the Corporations Act, ASIC may make an application to the court for an order requiring compliance with that direction.
Ta sklep temelji na pravno zavezujočih zahtevah za finančne trge, ki veljajo v Avstraliji v času sprejetja tega sklepa.
Finally, ASIC has entered into protocols for cooperation and the sharing of information with each relevant market operator in order to facilitate the supervision of the market and participants under the MIRs.
Komisija bi morala še naprej redno spremljati razvoj pravnih in nadzornih ureditev za finančne trge ter izpolnjevanje pogojev, na podlagi katerih je bil ta sklep sprejet.
It should therefore be concluded that financial markets are subject to effective supervision and enforcement in Australia on an ongoing basis.
Komisija bi morala ta sklep pregledati zlasti zaradi začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) št. 600/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] ter Direktive 2014/65/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].
The conditions laid down in Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 should therefore be considered to be satisfied with respect to financial markets authorised in Australia.
Redni pregled pravnih in nadzornih ureditev, ki se uporabljajo za finančne trge v Avstraliji, ne posega v možnost Komisije, da kadar koli izvede poseben pregled, če mora zaradi razvoja dogodkov ponovno oceniti enakovrednost, odobreno s tem sklepom.
This Decision is based on the legally binding requirements relating to financial markets in Australia at the time of the adoption of this Decision.
Takšna ponovna ocena bi lahko privedla do razveljavitve tega sklepa.
The Commission should continue monitoring on a regular basis the evolution of the legal and supervisory arrangements for financial markets and the fulfilment of the conditions on the basis of which this Decision has been taken.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Evropskega odbora za vrednostne papirje –
The regular review of the legal and supervisory arrangements applicable to financial markets in Australia is without prejudice to the possibility of the Commission to undertake a specific review at any time where relevant developments make it necessary for the Commission to reassess the equivalence granted by this Decision.
Člen 1
Such re-assessment could lead to the repeal of this Decision.
Za namene točke 7 člena 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 se finančni trgi z dovoljenjem v Avstraliji, ki so navedeni v Prilogi, štejejo za enakovredne reguliranim trgom, kot so opredeljeni v točki 14 člena 4(1) Direktive 2004/39/ES.
For the purposes of point (7) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, the financial markets authorised in Australia and set out in the Annex shall be considered equivalent to regulated markets as defined in point (14) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Za Komisijo
For the Commission
Uredba (EU) št. 600/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o trgih finančnih instrumentov in spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 (UL L 173, 12.6.2014, str.
The President
84).
OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p. 1.
Direktiva 2014/65/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o trgih finančnih instrumentov ter spremembi Direktive 2002/92/ES in Direktive 2011/61/EU (UL L 173, 12.6.2014, str.
Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC (OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
349).
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2273
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/2273
on the equivalence of recognised exchanges in Canada in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o enakovrednosti priznanih borz v Kanadi v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Point (7) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 defines OTC derivatives as derivative contracts the execution of which does not take place on a regulated market within the meaning of point (14) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] or on a third-country market considered as equivalent to a regulated market in accordance with Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Točka 7 člena 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 izvedene finančne instrumente OTC opredeljuje kot pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih, ki se ne izvršijo na reguliranem trgu v smislu točke 14 člena 4(1) Direktive 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] ali na trgu tretje države, ki se šteje za enakovrednega reguliranemu trgu v skladu s členom 2a Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012.
The purpose of this equivalence assessment is therefore to verify that the legally binding requirements which apply to recognised exchanges in Canada are equivalent to the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC, and that those markets are subject to effective supervision and enforcement on an ongoing basis.
Namen te ocene enakovrednosti je torej preveriti, ali so pravno zavezujoče zahteve, ki se uporabljajo za priznane borze v Kanadi, enakovredne zahtevam iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES ter ali so navedeni trgi predmet stalnega učinkovitega nadzora in izvrševanja.
Markets which are authorised as recognised exchanges on the date of adoption of this Decision should be therefore identified as markets considered equivalent to a regulated market within the meaning of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Trge, ki imajo na datum sprejetja tega sklepa dovoljenje kot priznane borze, je treba zato opredeliti kot trge, ki se štejejo za enakovredne reguliranemu trgu v skladu z Direktivo 2004/39/ES.
The legally binding requirements for recognised exchanges authorised in Canada comprise a three-tiered structure.
Pravno zavezujoče zahteve za priznane borze v Kanadi sestavljajo trije stebri.
The first tier consists of provincial and territorial legal legislation which provides for the general requirements that trading venues operators must comply with if they wish to carry on activities in a province or in a territory.
Prvi steber sestavlja provincialna in teritorialna zakonodaja, ki določa splošne zahteve, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati upravljavci mest trgovanja, če želijo izvajati dejavnosti v provinci ali na teritoriju.
More specific and detailed requirements applicable to the recognised exchanges are laid down in National Instruments (NIs), which constitute the second tier.
Konkretnejše in podrobnejše zahteve, ki se uporabljajo za priznane borze, so določene v nacionalnih standardih, t. i. „National Instruments“, ki sestavljajo drugi steber.
NIs are adopted by the Securities Regulatory Authorities (SRAs) of each province and territory and cover areas such as fair access and transparency, clearing and settlement, reporting and disclosure obligations.
Te sprejemajo agencije za trg vrednostnih papirjev (Securities Regulatory Authorities – SRA) vsake province in teritorija, standardi pa zajemajo področja, kot so pravičen dostop in preglednost, kliring in poravnava ter zahteve glede poročanja in razkritij.
Recognition orders constitute the third tier.
Tretji steber sestavljajo sklepi o priznanju.
They are issued for each recognised exchange by the relevant SRA and set out the operational terms and conditions imposed on each recognised exchange.
Za vsako priznano borzo jih izda ustrezna SRA, v sklepih pa so določeni pogoji poslovanja za posamezno priznano borzo.
Recognition orders issued by any SRA have the force of law and any breach of the terms and conditions set out there in is a breach of securities law or commodity futures law.
Sklepi o priznanju, ki jih izda katera koli SRA, imajo zakonsko moč in vsaka kršitev pogojev iz teh sklepov predstavlja kršitev zakona o vrednostnih papirjih ali zakona o terminskih pogodbah na blago.
The legally binding requirements applicable to recognised exchanges in Canada deliver substantive results equivalent to those of the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC in the following areas: authorisation process, definitional requirements, access to the recognised exchange, organisational requirements, requirements for senior management, admission of financial instruments to trading, suspension and removal of instruments from trading, monitoring of compliance with the rules of the recognised exchange and access to clearing and settlement arrangements.
Pravno zavezujoče zahteve za priznane borze v Kanadi v veliki meri zagotavljajo rezultate, enakovredne rezultatom na podlagi zahtev iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES, na naslednjih področjih: postopek odobritve, zahteve glede opredelitev, dostop do priznane borze, organizacijske zahteve, zahteve za višje vodstvo, sprejem finančnih instrumentov v trgovanje, začasna ustavitev trgovanja z instrumenti in njihov umik iz trgovanja, nadzor skladnosti s pravili priznane borze in dostop do ureditev kliringa in poravnav.
Although shares can be admitted to trading on recognised exchanges authorised in Canada, the Commission considers that the assessment of those requirements is however not relevant for the purposes of this Decision given that its objective is to verify the equivalence of the legally binding requirements applicable to third-country markets in respect of derivatives contracts that are executed on those markets.
Kljub temu, da se lahko delnice sprejmejo v trgovanje na priznanih borzah z dovoljenjem v Kanadi, Komisija meni, da ocena navedenih zahtev ni relevantna za namene tega sklepa, saj je njen cilj preveriti enakovrednost pravno zavezujočih zahtev, ki se uporabljajo za trge tretjih držav v zvezi s pogodbami o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih, ki se izvršujejo na teh trgih.
It should therefore be concluded that the legally binding requirements for recognised exchanges authorised in Canada deliver results equivalent to those of the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Zato je ustrezno zaključiti, da pravno zavezujoče zahteve za priznane borze z dovoljenjem v Kanadi zagotavljajo rezultate, enakovredne tistim na podlagi zahtev iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES.
SRAs are responsible for the regulation and supervision of recognised exchanges authorised within their jurisdiction.
SRA so odgovorne za urejanje in nadzor priznanih borz, ki imajo dovoljenje v njihovih jurisdikcijah.
In addition, recognised exchanges are required by the terms of their Recognition Order to report suspected breaches of securities law by participants and their clients to the SRAs, and are also required to regularly report on the status of their investigations and disciplinary action to the SRAs.
SRA imajo tudi pooblastila za nalaganje sankcij priznanim borzam v primeru kršitev zakonodaje o vrednostnih papirjih (zakonodajnih aktov, nacionalnih standardov, predpisov in sklepov o priznanju).
To carry out their supervisory duties, recognised exchanges have dedicated investigation and enforcement staff to monitor trading on an ongoing basis and to perform on-site trade desk reviews of participants.
Sankcije vključujejo globe, opomine, preklic sklepa o priznanju, začasen odvzem registracije ali vključitev dodatnih pogojev, ki jih morajo priznane borze izpolniti, da zagotovijo skladnost z zakonodajo o vrednostnih papirjih.
SRAs have also the power to impose sanctions on recognised exchanges for infringements of securities laws (legislative acts, national instruments, rules and recognition orders).
Zato je ustrezno zaključiti, da se za navedene finančne trge v Kanadi izvajata stalen učinkovit nadzor in izvrševanje.
The sanctions include fines, reprimands, the revocation of the recognition order or suspension of registration, or the addition of terms and conditions that recognised exchanges have to fulfil in order to comply with securities laws.
Tako bi bilo treba pogoje iz člena 2a Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 v zvezi s priznanimi borzami z dovoljenjem v Kanadi šteti za izpolnjene.
It should therefore be concluded that those financial markets are considered to be subject to effective supervision and enforcement in Canada on an ongoing basis.
Ta sklep temelji na pravno zavezujočih zahtevah za priznane borze, ki veljajo v Kanadi v času sprejetja tega sklepa.
The conditions laid down in Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 should therefore be considered to be satisfied with respect to recognised exchanges authorised in Canada.
Komisija bi morala še naprej redno spremljati razvoj pravnih in nadzornih ureditev za priznane borze ter izpolnjevanje pogojev, na podlagi katerih je bil ta sklep sprejet.
This Decision is based on the legally binding requirements relating to recognised exchanges applicable in Canada at the time of the adoption of this Decision.
Komisija bi morala ta sklep pregledati zlasti zaradi začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) št. 600/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] ter Direktive 2014/65/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].
The Commission should continue to monitor on a regular basis the evolution of the legal and supervisory arrangements for recognised exchanges and the fulfilment of the conditions on the basis of which this Decision has been taken.
Redni pregled pravnih in nadzornih ureditev, ki se uporabljajo za priznane borze v Kanadi, ne posega v možnost Komisije, da kadar koli izvede poseben pregled, če mora zaradi razvoja dogodkov ponovno oceniti enakovrednost, odobreno s tem sklepom.
In particular, the Commission should review this Decision in light of the entry into application of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] and Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Takšna ponovna ocena bi lahko privedla do razveljavitve tega sklepa.
The regular review of the legal and supervisory arrangements applicable to recognised exchanges in Canada is without prejudice to the possibility of the Commission to undertake a specific review at any time where relevant developments make it necessary for the Commission to reassess the equivalence granted by this Decision.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Evropskega odbora za vrednostne papirje –
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Za namene točke 7 člena 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 se priznane borze v Kanadi, ki so navedene v Prilogi, štejejo za enakovredne reguliranim trgom, kot so opredeljeni v točki 14 člena 4(1) Direktive 2004/39/ES.
For the purposes of point (7) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, the recognised exchanges in Canada and set out in the Annex shall be considered as equivalent to regulated markets as defined in point (14) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Ta sklep začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The President
Direktiva 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o trgih finančnih instrumentov in o spremembah direktiv Sveta 85/611/EGS, 93/6/EGS in Direktive 2000/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter o razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 93/22/EGS (UL L 145, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p. 1.
Uredba (EU) št. 600/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o trgih finančnih instrumentov in spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 (UL L 173, 12.6.2014, str. 84).
Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC (OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
Direktiva 2014/65/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. maja 2014 o trgih finančnih instrumentov ter spremembi Direktive 2002/92/ES in Direktive 2011/61/EU (UL L 173, 12.6.2014, str. 349).
Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 84).
PRILOGA
Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 349).
Priznane borze v Kanadi iz člena 1
TSX Venture Inc.;
Med njihove nadzorne pristojnosti med drugim spada pooblastilo za sprejetje odločitve glede trgovanja in načina, na katerega posluje priznana borza.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2274
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/2274
on the equivalence of the regulatory framework for central counterparties in New Zealand in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o enakovrednosti regulativnega okvira Nove Zelandije za centralne nasprotne stranke v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
In order for a third-country legal regime to be considered equivalent to the legal regime of the Union in respect of CCPs, the substantive outcome of the applicable legal and supervisory arrangements should be equivalent to Union requirements in respect of the regulatory objectives they achieve.
Da bi se pravne ureditve tretjih držav v zvezi s CNS obravnavale kot enakovredne pravni ureditvi Unije, bi morale biti veljavne pravne in nadzorne ureditve v smislu doseganja regulativnih ciljev v veliki meri enakovredne zahtevam Unije.
The purpose of this equivalence assessment is therefore to verify that the legal and supervisory arrangements of New Zealand ensure that CCPs established and authorised therein do not expose clearing members and trading venues established in the Union to a higher level of risk than the latter could be exposed to by CCPs authorised in the Union and, consequently, do not pose unacceptable levels of systemic risk in the Union.
Namen te ocene enakovrednosti je torej preveriti, ali pravne in nadzorne ureditve Nove Zelandije zagotavljajo, da CNS s sedežem in dovoljenjem v tej državi klirinških članov ali mest trgovanja s sedežem v Uniji ne izpostavljajo višji stopnji tveganja kot CNS z dovoljenjem v Uniji, posledično pa ne pomenijo nesprejemljivih stopenj sistemskega tveganja v Uniji.
The legally binding requirements of New Zealand for CCPs authorised therein consist of Part 5C of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 (‘the primary rules’) and the orders by which CCPs are authorised as a designated settlement system (‘designation orders’).
Pravno zavezujoče zahteve Nove Zelandije za CNS z dovoljenjem v navedeni državi sestavljajo del 5C Zakona o centralni banki Nove Zelandije iz leta 1989 (Reserve Bank of New Zeland Act, v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna pravila) in odredbe, s katerimi CNS pridobijo dovoljenje kot imenovani poravnalni sistemi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odredbe o imenovanju).
The primary rules and the designation orders set out the requirements that CCPs have to comply with on an ongoing basis to be able to provide clearing services in New Zealand.
Osnovna pravila in odredbe o imenovanju določajo zahteve, ki jih morajo CNS vedno izpolnjevati, da lahko na Novi Zelandiji opravljajo klirinške storitve.
CCPs established in New Zealand can be authorised as a designated settlement system by the Governor-General, on advice of both the Minister of Finance and the Minister of Commerce and in accordance with a joint recommendation of the Bank of New Zealand and the Financial Markets Authority (together, ‘the joint regulators’).
Generalni guverner lahko CNS s sedežem na Novi Zelandiji podeli dovoljenje za imenovani poravnalni sistem na predlog ministra za finance in ministra za trgovino ter v skladu s skupnim priporočilom Banke Nove Zelandije in Organa za finančne trge (skupaj v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupni regulativni organi).
Conditions may be imposed for authorising a CCP as a designated settlement system.
Za pridobitev dovoljenja CNS kot imenovanega poravnalnega sistema se lahko postavijo pogoji.
The designation orders approve the specific internal rules and procedures of the designated settlement system which contain the requirements that designated settlement systems must comply with, and which are consistent with the joint regulators' high-level policy published by the joint regulators.
Z odredbami o imenovanju se odobrijo posebna notranja pravila in predpisi imenovanih poravnalnih sistemov, ki vsebujejo zahteve, ki jih morajo imenovani poravnalni sistemi izpolnjevati in ki so skladne s politiko na visoki ravni, ki jo objavijo skupni regulativni organi.
Pursuant to the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989, designated settlement systems must comply with relevant international standards concerning clearing and settlement systems, including the Principles for Financial Markets Infrastructures (‘PFMIs’) issued in April 2012 by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems [2] and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (‘IOSCO’).
Poleg tega morajo v skladu z Zakonom o Centralni banki Nove Zelandije iz leta 1989 imenovani poravnalni sistemi spoštovati zadevne mednarodne standarde o klirinških in poravnalnih sistemih, vključno z načeli za infrastrukture finančnega trga, ki sta jih aprila 2012 izdala Odbor za plačilne in poravnalne sisteme (CPSS) [2] in Mednarodna organizacija nadzornikov trgov vrednostnih papirjev (IOSCO).
The joint regulators issued a policy statement ‘The Designation and Oversight of Designated Settlement Systems’ requiring designated settlement systems to comply with the PFMIs.
Skupni regulativni organi so izdali izjavo o politiki „Imenovanje in nadzor imenovanih poravnalnih sistemov“ (The Designation and Oversight of Designated Settlement Systems), ki od imenovanih poravnalnih sistemov zahteva spoštovanje načel za infrastrukture finančnega trga.
The legally binding requirements applicable to CCPs authorised in New Zealand therefore comprise a two-tiered structure.
Pravno zavezujoče zahteve za CNS z dovoljenjem na Novi Zelandiji torej sestavlja dvoplastni sistem.
The core principles contained in the primary rules lay down the high-level standards with which designated settlement systems must comply in order to obtain authorisation to provide clearing services in New Zealand.
Temeljna načela, določena v osnovnih pravilih, določajo visoke standarde, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati imenovani poravnalni sistemi, da pridobijo dovoljenje za opravljanje storitev kliringa na Novi Zelandiji.
Those primary rules comprise the first tier of the legally binding requirements in New Zealand.
Ta osnovna pravila so prva plast pravno zavezujočih zahtev na Novi Zelandiji.
In order to prove compliance with the primary rules, designated settlement systems must submit their internal rules and procedures to the approval of the joint regulators.
Da bi imenovani poravnalni sistemi dokazali skladnost z osnovnimi pravili, morajo svoja notranja pravila in postopke predložiti v odobritev skupnim regulativnim organom.
Those internal rules and procedures, together with the designation orders through which they are approved, comprise the second tier of the legally binding requirements in New Zealand, which must provide prescriptive detail regarding the way in which the designated settlement system will meet those standards and the PFMIs.
Ta interna pravila in postopki so skupaj z odredbami o imenovanju, s katerimi imenovani poravnalni sistemi pridobijo dovoljenje, druga plast pravno zavezujočih zahtev na Novi Zelandiji, ki mora določati preskriptivne podrobnosti o tem, kako bo imenovani poravnalni sistem izpolnil navedene standarde in načela za infrastrukture finančnega trga.