natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Baltic herring ≤ 21 cm can be marketed or processed for human consumption,
Obvezno sortiranje baltskega sleda ≤ 21 cm in > 21 cm pred dajanjem na trg (približek, ker se sortira glede na širino, vendar to ni težava):
Baltic herring > 21 cm can be marketed or processed for human consumption for the domestic market only, or can be marketed outside the domestic market only if analysis of the individual lot has demonstrated compliance).
baltski sled ≤ 21 cm se lahko trži za prehrano ljudi,
obligatory sorting of the Baltic herring ≤ 21 cm and > 21 cm before placing on the market (as the sorting is done by width, this is approximate, but this is no problem):
baltski sled > 21 cm se ne more tržiti ali predelati za prehrano ljudi, razen če je bila z analizo posamezne serije dokazana skladnost.
Baltic herring ≤ 21 cm can be marketed for human consumption,
Losos iz ICES 24, 25 in 26:
Baltic herring > 21 cm cannot be marketed or processed for human consumption, unless analysis of the individual lot has demonstrated compliance.
Švedska, Finska in Latvija:
Salmon from ICES 24, 25 and 26:
Losos se lahko trži na domačem trgu (odstopanje).
Sweden, Finland and Latvia:
Trgovanje v drugih državah članicah EU: možno samo, če je bila z analizo posamezne serije dokazana skladnost z zakonodajo EU.
Salmon can be marketed for domestic market (derogation),
Nemčija, Danska, Estonija, Litva in Poljska:
Trade to other EU Member States countries: only possible if analysis of the individual lot has shown compliance with EU legislation.
Losos, težji od 2 kg, se lahko trži za prehrano ljudi samo, če je bila z analizo posamezne serije dokazana skladnost z zakonodajo EU.
Germany, Denmark, Estonia, Lithuania and Poland:
Losos teže manj kot 5,5 kg je skladen po obrezovanju (postopek se uporablja na Danskem in Poljskem samo za ICES 24, 25 in 26) in losos teže od 5,5 kg do 7,9 kg je skladen po obrezovanju in odstranitvi trebušnega dela (postopek uporablja na Poljskem za ICES 24, 25 in 26).
Salmon larger than 2 kg can be marketed for human consumption only if analysis of the individual lot has shown compliance with EU legislation,
Obrezan losos > 5,5 kg in obrezan losos z odstranjenim trebušnim delom > 7,9 kg se lahko trži za prehrano ljudi samo, če je bila z analizo posamezne serije dokazana skladnost z zakonodajo EU.
Salmon weighing less than 5,5 kg is compliant after trimming (procedure applied in Denmark and Poland only for ICES 24, 25 and 26) and salmon more than 5,5 kg up to 7,9 kg is compliant after trimming and removing ventral part (procedure applied in Poland for ICES 24, 25 and 26),
Losos iz ICES 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 in 32:
Trimmed salmon > 5,5 kg and salmon trimmed and ventral part removed > 7,9 kg can be marketed for human consumption only if analysis of the individual lot has shown compliance with EU legislation.
Trgovanje v drugih državah članicah EU: možno samo, če je bila z analizo posamezne serije dokazana skladnost z zakonodajo EU.
Salmon from ICES 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32:
Losos se lahko trži za prehrano ljudi samo, če je bila z analizo posamezne serije dokazana skladnost z zakonodajo EU.
Trade to other EU Member States countries: only possible if analysis of individual lot has shown compliance with EU legislation.
(Morska) postrv
Salmon can be marketed for human consumption only if analysis of the individual lot has shown compliance with EU legislation.
(Morska) postrv iz ICES 22, 23, 24, 25 in 26:
(Sea) trout
(Morska) postrv se lahko trži na domačem trgu (odstopanje).
(sea) trout from ICES 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26:
(Morska) postrv teže več kot 2 kg: postrv se lahko trži za prehrano ljudi samo, če je bila z analizo posamezne serije dokazana skladnost z zakonodajo EU.
(sea) trout can be marketed for domestic market (derogation),
Obrezana (morska) postrv z odstranjenim trebušnim delom < 4,5 kg: izpolnjene zahteve (postopek se uporablja na Poljskem za ICES 22-23-24-25-26).
(sea) trout weighing more than 2 kg: trout can be marketed for human consumption only if analysis of the individual lot has shown compliance with EU legislation,
Obrezana (morska) postrv z odstranjenim trebušnim delom > 4,5 kg se lahko trži za prehrano ljudi samo, če je bila z analizo posamezne serije dokazana skladnost z zakonodajo EU.
(sea) trout trimmed and ventral part removed < 4,5 kg: compliant (procedure applied in Poland for ICES 22-23-24-25-26),
(Morska) postrv iz ICES 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 in 32:
(sea) trout trimmed and ventral part removed > 4,5 kg can be marketed for human consumption if analysis of the individual lot has shown compliance with EU legislation.
(morska) postrv se lahko trži za prehrano ljudi samo, če je bila z analizo posamezne serije dokazana skladnost z zakonodajo EU.
(sea) trout from ICES 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32:
Papalina iz ICES 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 se lahko trži za prehrano ljudi.
(sea) trout can be marketed for human consumption only if analysis of the individual lot has shown compliance with EU legislation.
Papalina iz ICES 29, 30, 31, 32:
Sprat from ICES 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 can be marketed for human consumption
Obvezno sortiranje papalin ≤ 12,5 cm in papalin > 12,5 cm;
Sprat from ICES 29, 30, 31, 32:
papaline ≤ 12,5 cm se lahko tržijo za prehrano ljudi;
Obligatory sorting in sprats ≤ 12,5 cm and sprats > 12,5 cm,
papaline > 12,5 cm se ne morejo tržiti ali predelati za prehrano ljudi, razen če je bila z analizo posamezne serije dokazana skladnost.
Sprats ≤ 12,5 cm can be marketed for human consumption,
Za jetra polenovke iz polenovke, ujete v baltski regiji, se sumi, da zahteve niso bile izpolnjene, zato bi bilo treba analizirati vsako serijo, da se dokaže skladnost, pred dajanjem na trg EU.
Sprats > 12,5 cm cannot be marketed or processed for human consumption, unless analysis of the individual lot has demonstrated compliance.
V območjih ICES 29, 30, 31 in 32: če so papaline manjše od 12,5 cm in mlajše od 5 let, se šteje, da so zahteve izpolnjene.
Cod liver from cod caught in the Baltic region is suspected not to be compliant and therefore every lot should be analysed to show compliance before being placed on the EU market.
Če so večje od 12,5 cm, se sumi, da zahteve niso izpolnjene.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2016/1110
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2016/1110
of 28 June 2016
z dne 28. junija 2016
on the monitoring of the presence of nickel in feed
o spremljanju prisotnosti niklja v krmi
The presence of nickel (Ni) in feed can arise from both natural and anthropogenic sources.
Nikelj (Ni) je lahko prisoten v krmi tako iz naravnih kot iz antropogenih virov.
Additionally, certain feed materials contain metallic nickel, since it is used as a catalyst in their production.
Poleg tega nekatera posamična krmila vsebujejo kovinski nikelj, saj se uporablja kot katalizator pri njihovi proizvodnji.
The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) has provided a scientific opinion on the risks to animal and public health and the environment to the presence of Ni in feed [1].
Odbor Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) za onesnaževala v prehranski verigi (odbor CONTAM) je pripravil znanstveno mnenje o tveganjih za zdravje živali, javno zdravje in okolje zaradi prisotnosti niklja v krmi [1].
The CONTAM Panel concluded that any adverse impact of Ni via feed to cattle, pigs, rabbits, ducks, fish, dogs, chickens, horses, sheep, goats and cats is unlikely.
Odbor CONTAM je ugotovil, da je kakršen koli negativen učinek niklja na govedo, prašiče, kunce, race, ribe, pse, piščance, konje, ovce, koze in mačke prek krme malo verjeten.
Concerning the assessment of human health risks from the presence of Ni in food of animal origin, the CONTAM Panel concluded that in the average population the current levels of chronic exposure to Ni, considering only foods of animal origin, might be of potential concern in the young population.
V zvezi z oceno tveganja za zdravje ljudi zaradi prisotnosti niklja v živilih živalskega izvora je odbor CONTAM ugotovil, da je lahko tveganje v splošni populaciji ob trenutnih ravneh kronične izpostavljenosti niklju prek samo živil živalskega izvora zaskrbljujoče le za mlado populacijo.
Regarding acute dietary exposure, the CONTAM Panel concluded that nickel-sensitized individuals are also at risk of developing eczematous flare-up skin reactions through the consumption of food of animal origin.
Glede akutne prehranske izpostavljenosti je odbor CONTAM ugotovil, da so tudi posamezniki, preobčutljivi na nikelj, lahko izpostavljeni tveganju za ekcematozne kožne reakcije zaradi uživanja živil živalskega izvora.
The contribution of food of animal origin to human dietary exposure to Ni should therefore not be underestimated, particularly in age classes with high dietary exposure to Ni.
Zato se ne bi smelo podcenjevati prispevka živil živalskega izvora k prehranski izpostavljenosti ljudi niklju, zlasti pri starostnih razredih z visoko prehransko izpostavljenostjo niklju.
However from the available data it was not possible to determine carry-over rates from feed to food of animal origin.
Vendar na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov ni bilo mogoče določiti stopnje prenosa iz krme v živila živalskega izvora.
It is observed that the occurrence data on Ni in feed used in the EFSA scientific opinion were mainly originating from one Member State and are therefore not necessarily representative for the presence of Ni in feed in the EU.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so podatki o prisotnosti niklja v krmi, ki jih je Agencija uporabila pri svojem znanstvenem mnenju, izvirali predvsem iz ene države članice in zato niso nujno reprezentativni za prisotnost niklja v krmi v EU.
It is therefore appropriate to monitor the presence of Ni in feed across the EU before considering the setting of maximum levels of Ni in feed or any other risk management measures needed to ensure a high level of animal and human health protection,
Zato je pred razmislekom o morebitni določitvi mejnih vrednosti niklja v krmi ali kakršnih koli drugih ukrepov za obvladovanje tveganja za zagotovitev visoke ravni varstva zdravja živali in ljudi primerno spremljati prisotnost niklja v krmi po vsej EU –
Member States should, with the active involvement of feed business operators, perform monitoring for the presence of Ni in feed.
Države članice bi morale skupaj z aktivnim sodelovanjem nosilcev dejavnosti poslovanja s krmo spremljati prisotnost niklja v krmi.
In order to ensure that the samples are representative for the sampled lot, Member States should follow the sampling procedure laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 [2].
Za zagotovitev reprezentativnosti vzorcev iz vzorčenega lota bi morale države članice upoštevati postopek vzorčenja iz Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 152/2009 [2].
Member States should ensure that the analytical results are provided on a regular basis and at the latest by 31 October 2017 to EFSA in the EFSA data submission format in line with the requirements of EFSA's Guidance on Standard Sample Description (SSD) for Food and Feed [3] and the additional EFSA's specific reporting requirements.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da se rezultati analiz redno in najpozneje do 31. oktobra 2017 predložijo agenciji EFSA v obliki za predložitev podatkov v skladu z njenimi navodili o standardnem opisu vzorca (Standard Sample Description – SSD) za živila in krmo [3] ter dodatnimi posebnimi zahtevami agencije EFSA glede poročanja.
Done at Brussels, 28 June 2016.
V Bruslju, 28. junija 2016
Scientific Opinion on the risks to animal and public health and the environment related to the presence of nickel in feed.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 152/2009 z dne 27. januarja 2009 o določitvi metod vzorčenja in analitskih metod za uradni nadzor krme (UL L 54, 26.2.2009, str. 1).
EFSA Journal 2015;13(4):4074, 76 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4074 www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal
Odbor CONTAM agencije EFSA, 2015.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed (OJ L 54, 26.2.2009, p. 1).
Znanstveno mnenje o tveganjih za zdravje živali, javno zdravje in okolje zaradi prisotnosti niklja v krmi.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2016/1111
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2016/1111
on the monitoring of nickel in food
o spremljanju niklja v živilih
Nickel is a metal occurring widely in the earth's surface.
Nikelj je kovina, ki je zelo prisotna na površini zemlje.
Nickel is present in food and drinking water due to natural and anthropogenic activity.
Nikelj je prisoten v živilih in pitni vodi zaradi naravnega in antropogenega delovanja.
The Hellenic Food Authority asked the European Food Safety Authority (‘EFSA’) to evaluate the risk to human health from the presence of nickel in food, particularly in vegetables.
Grška agencija za varnost hrane je zaprosila Evropsko agencijo za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) za oceno tveganja za zdravje ljudi zaradi prisotnosti niklja v živilih, zlasti v zelenjavi.
The EFSA Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) decided to extend the risk assessment to drinking water and adopted the Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of nickel in food and drinking water [1].
Znanstveni odbor Agencije za onesnaževala v prehranski verigi (odbor CONTAM) je odločil razširiti oceno tveganja na pitno vodo in sprejel znanstveno mnenje o tveganjih za javno zdravje v zvezi s prisotnostjo niklja v živilih in pitni vodi [1].
This opinion identified reproductive and developmental toxicity as the critical effect for the risk characterization of chronic oral exposure to nickel.
V tem mnenju sta bili reproduktivna in razvojna toksičnost opredeljeni kot kritičen učinek za opredelitev tveganja kronične oralne izpostavljenosti niklju.
Eczematous flare-up reactions and worsening of allergic reactions were identified as the critical effect for acute oral exposure to nickel of nickel-sensitized humans.
Ekcematozne kožne reakcije in poslabšanje alergičnih reakcij so bili opredeljeni kot kritičen učinek akutne oralne izpostavljenosti oseb, preobčutljivih na nikelj, niklju.
Data related to occurrence of nickel in food and drinking water was collected in 15 different European countries.
Podatki o prisotnosti niklja v živilih in pitni vodi so bili zbrani v 15 različnih evropskih državah.
However, as 80 % of the total collected data were collected in one Member State, a geographically more wide spread data set would be needed to verify the occurrence of nickel in food throughout the Union.
Ker pa je bilo 80 % vseh zbranih podatkov zbranih v eni državi članici, je potreben geografsko bolj razširjen sklop podatkov, da se preveri prisotnost niklja v živilih po vsej Uniji.
For certain food groups considered as main contributors to dietary exposure in the EFSA Scientific Opinion, only limited occurrence data were available.
Za nekatere skupine živil, ki po znanstvenem mnenju Agencije najbolj prispevajo k prehranski izpostavljenosti, so bili na voljo le omejeni podatki o prisotnosti.
In view of possible future risk management measures, a better view on the nickel content in food commodities belonging to these food groups would be advisable,
Zaradi morebitnih prihodnjih ukrepov za obvladovanje tveganja je priporočljivo zagotoviti boljši vpogled v prisotnost niklja v živilih iz teh skupin živil –
Member States should, with the active involvement of food business operators and other interested parties, perform monitoring of the presence of nickel in food during 2016, 2017 and 2018.
Države članice bi morale ob aktivnem sodelovanju nosilcev živilske dejavnosti in drugih zainteresiranih strani spremljati prisotnost niklja v živilih v letih 2016, 2017 in 2018.
The monitoring should focus on cereals, cereal-based products, infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food for infants and young children, baby food, food for special medical purposes intended specifically for infants and young children, food supplements, legumes, nuts and oil seeds, milk and dairy products, alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, sugar and confectionery (including cocoa and chocolate), fruits, vegetables and vegetable products (including fungi), dry tea leaves, dry parts of other plants used for herbal infusions and bivalve molluscs.
Spremljanje bi se moralo osredotočiti na žita, žitne proizvode, začetne formule za dojenčke, nadaljevalne formule za dojenčke in majhne otroke, žitne kašice za dojenčke in majhne otroke, otroško hrano, živila za posebne zdravstvene namene, namenjena zlasti dojenčkom in majhnim otrokom, prehranska dopolnila, metuljnice, oreške in oljna semena, mleko in mlečne izdelke, alkoholne in brezalkoholne pijače, sladkor in konditorske izdelke (vključno s kakavovimi in čokoladnimi), sadje, zelenjavo in zelenjavne proizvode (vključno z gobami), suhe čajne liste, suhe dele drugih rastlin za zeliščne čaje in školjke.
The sampling procedures should be performed in accordance with the provisions laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 [2] in order to ensure that the samples are representative for the sampled lot.
Postopke vzorčenja bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z določbami iz Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 333/2007 [2] za zagotovitev, da so vzorci reprezentativni za vzorčeni lot.
The samples should be analysed as marketed.
Vzorce bi bilo treba analizirati takšne, kot se tržijo.
The analysis of total nickel should be performed in accordance with Standard EN 13804:2013, ‘Foodstuffs — Determination of elements and their chemical species — General considerations and specific requirements’, preferably by making use of an analytical method based on flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) or graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS), inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) or mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).
Analizo skupnega niklja bi bilo treba opraviti v skladu s standardom EN 13804:2013, „Živila – Določevanje elementov in njihovih kemijskih oblik – splošne ugotovitve in posebne zahteve“, po možnosti z uporabo analitske metode, ki temelji na plamenski atomski absorpcijski spektrometriji (FAAS) ali atomski absorpcijski spektrometriji z grafitno pečjo (GFAAS), optični emisijski spektrometriji z induktivno sklopljeno plazmo (ICP-OES) ali masni spektrometriji (ICP-MS).
Member States, food business operators and other interested parties should provide to EFSA the monitoring data expressed on whole weight basis with the information and in the electronic reporting format as set out by EFSA for compilation into one database by 1 October of 2016, 2017 and 2018.
Države članice, nosilci živilske dejavnosti in druge zainteresirane strani bi morale Agenciji predložiti podatke o spremljanju, izražene glede na skupno težo, skupaj z informacijami in v elektronski obliki, kot jih je Agencija določila za zbiranje podatkov v enotni bazi, do 1. oktobra leta 2016, 2017 in 2018.
Available occurrence data from preceding years that have not yet been provided should be transmitted according to the same modalities at the earliest occasion.
Razpoložljive podatke o prisotnosti iz prejšnjih let, ki še niso bili predloženi, bi bilo treba poslati v skladu z istimi pogoji ob prvi priložnosti.
Scientific Opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of nickel in food and drinking water.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 333/2007 z dne 28. marca 2007 o določitvi metod vzorčenja in analitskih metod za nadzor vsebnosti elementov v sledovih in onesnaževal iz predelave v živilih (UL L 88, 29.3.2007, str. 29).
EFSA Journal 2015;13(2):4002, 202 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4002
Odbor CONTAM agencije EFSA, 2015.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 of 28 March 2007 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the control of the levels of trace elements and processing contaminants in foodstuffs (OJ L 88, 29.3.2007, p. 29).
Znanstveno mnenje o tveganjih za javno zdravje v zvezi s prisotnostjo niklja v živilih in pitni vodi.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2016/1117
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2016/1117
of 15 June 2016
z dne 15. junija 2016,
addressed to the Hellenic Republic on the specific urgent measures to be taken by Greece in view of the resumption of transfers under Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council
naslovljeno na Helensko republiko, o posebnih nujnih ukrepih, ki bi jih morala Grčija sprejeti zaradi ponovne vzpostavitve predaj v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 604/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 292 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 292 Pogodbe,
The transfer of applicants for international protection to Greece under Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [1] (hereafter ‘the Dublin Regulation’) has been suspended by Member States since 2011, following two judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) [2], which identified systemic deficiencies in the Greek asylum system, resulting in a violation of the fundamental rights of applicants for international protection transferred from other Member States to Greece under Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 [3].
Države članice so leta 2011 začasno ustavile predaje prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito Grčiji v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 604/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: dublinska uredba) po sodbah Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ESČP) in Sodišča Evropske unije [2], s katerima so bile ugotovljene sistemske pomanjkljivosti grškega azilnega sistema, zaradi katerih je prihajalo do kršitev temeljnih pravic prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito, ki so jih druge države članice predale Grčiji v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 343/2003 [3].
The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe has been monitoring the situation in Greece since the M.S.S v Belgium and Greece judgment was delivered by the ECHR in 2011 on the basis of progress reports that Greece is required to submit as evidence of the execution of the judgment and on the basis of evidence from NGOs and international organisations, such as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), that operate in Greece.
Po razglasitvi sodbe ESČP v zadevi M. S. S. proti Belgiji in Grčiji leta 2011 je Odbor ministrov Sveta Evrope spremljal stanje v Grčiji na podlagi poročil o napredku, ki jih mora Grčija predložiti kot dokaz, da izvršuje sodbo, ter na podlagi dokazov nevladnih in mednarodnih organizacij, ki delujejo v Grčiji, kot je Urad Visokega komisarja Združenih narodov za begunce (UNHCR).
As a result of the M.S.S judgment, Greece committed to reform its asylum system on the basis of a national Action Plan on Asylum Reform and Migration Management presented in August 2010 and revised in January 2013 (hereafter ‘the Greek Action Plan’).
Grčija se je zaradi sodbe v zadevi M. S. S. zavezala k reformi svojega azilnega sistema na podlagi nacionalnega akcijskega načrta za azilno reformo in upravljanje migracij, ki je bil predstavljen avgusta 2010 in revidiran januarja 2013 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: grški akcijski načrt).
On 1 October 2015, Greece presented a Roadmap on the implementation of the relocation scheme and hotspots to the Council, which also outlines certain actions to be prioritised to ensure implementation of agreed pending actions in the areas of asylum and reception.
Grčija je 1. oktobra 2015 Svetu predstavila časovni načrt za izvajanje programa za premestitev in žariščnih točk, v katerem je opredelila tudi nekatere ukrepe, ki jih je treba obravnavati prednostno, da se zagotovi izvajanje dogovorjenih še neizvršenih ukrepov na področju azila in sprejema.
On 10 February 2016, the Commission addressed a first Recommendation to the Hellenic Republic on the urgent measures to be taken by Greece in view of the resumption of transfers under the Dublin Regulation (hereafter ‘the first Recommendation’) [4].
Komisija je 10. februarja 2016 na Helensko republiko naslovila prvo priporočilo o nujnih ukrepih, ki bi jih morala Grčija sprejeti zaradi ponovne vzpostavitve predaj v skladu z dublinsko uredbo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvo priporočilo) [4].