natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The second expert noted in its report that the impact of the agreement as originally signed, that is for a period of 10 years with an option to extend it for a further 10 years, on the BER airport had not been taken into consideration by FBS in 2003, when the opportunity to sign the agreement was assessed.
Med letoma 2004 in 2007 je družba easyJet prepeljala med […] % in […] % vseh potnikov na letališču Schönefeld.
As noted by the second expert, the 2003 easyJet agreement in its initial terms was set to be still applicable for several years after the opening of BER, scheduled for 2011.
Leta 2003 se je pričakovalo, da bo družba easyJet daleč največji letalski prevoznik glede prometa.
Moreover, that agreement foresaw conditions which were apparently more favourable than those envisaged in the general charges planned for BER as of its opening.
Družba FBS je zaradi pogodbene obveznosti družbe easyJet glede uporabe določenega števila zrakoplovov na letališču Schönefeld lahko predvidela ustrezno veliko število potnikov od trenutka, ko je družba easyJet začela z opravljanjem dejavnosti.
According to the second expert, there could therefore be a risk that the existence of the 2003 easyJet agreement would result in other carriers exerting significant pressure on FBS in order to reduce the difference between the general charges prevailing at BER and those agreed with easyJet.
Po mnenju Mednarodne organizacije civilnega letalstva je zmogljivost terminala B obsegala 600000 potnikov na leto, kar je precej manj od števila potnikov, ki naj bi ga družba easyJet od leta 2004 po pričakovanjih prepeljala na letališče Schönefeld in z njega ([…] milijonov [72]).
However, in 2003 this was a very remote risk which could not be foreseen with any degree of likelihood let alone be quantified, notably in the light of the fast changing market developments of the LCC business.
Zato je jasno, da družba FBS z dogovorom o najemu z družbo easyJet iz leta 2004 ni izvajala nobene strategije „kopičenja zmogljivosti“, ki naj bi drugim letalskim prevoznikom preprečevala konkuriranje družbi easyJet na letališču Schönefeld.
As a matter of fact this risk never became concrete.
Leta 2006 je bilo brez večjih tehničnih prilagoditev na terminalu B oskrbljenih […] milijonov potnikov, tj. več kot dvakrat več od teoretične zmogljivosti.
Indeed, the 2007 easyJet amending agreement, which was set to expire upon the opening of BER, replaced the 2003 easyJet agreement.
Toliko potnikov je lahko bilo oskrbljenih zlasti, ker je prostore na terminalu uporabljal en sam prevoznik, zaradi česar so se pretoki potnikov lahko optimizirali.
Therefore, the second expert Study confirms that a prudent market economy operator would have concluded the 2003 easyJet agreement.
Glede najemnine ni smiselno primerjati najemnin na različnih letališčih zaradi razlik med njihovimi zmogljivostmi, pogojev na trgu in kakovosti prostorov.
To conclude, the 2003 easyJet agreement does not involve State aid.
Najemnine, ki jih je plačevala družba easyJet, so bile dejansko v skladu s preglednico najemnin, brez dodeljenega popusta.
Assessment of the agreements with other airlines (measure 3)
Družba easyJet je na terminalu B plačevala […] EUR na m2 za okenca za prijavo na let in […] EUR na m2 za pisarne.
FBS’ decisions to conclude the agreements with Ryanair, Germanwings, Volare, Icelandair, Norwegian Air Shuttle and Aer Lingus were also based on ex ante forecasts of incremental traffic, costs and revenues, which revealed that it would be profitable to conclude these agreements.
Podobne najemnine so bile dogovorjene z drugimi letalskimi prevozniki za podobne prostore na drugih terminalih.
For each of these agreements, the traffic forecasts expected were calculated on the basis of the number of flight movements expected from the carrier’s planned operations and reasonable assumptions about their load factors.
Družba Germanwings je na primer prav tako plačevala […] EUR na m2 za okenca za prijavo na let na terminalu A. Družba Aeroflot je plačevala […] EUR na m2 za pisarno na terminalu A. Na terminalu B je družba Condor najela pisarne pred družbo easyJet in plačevala nižjo najemnino za enake prostore na terminalu B. Družba easyJet je plačevala […] EUR na m2 za pisarne, družba Condor pa le […] EUR na m2.
These forecasts took into account all relevant categories of incremental cost and incremental revenue forecasts, including aeronautical and non-aeronautical categories of revenues and the costs of the financial incentives offered to the carriers by FBS.
Taka primerjava je primerna za ocenjevanje obstoja gospodarske prednosti v okviru dogovora o najemu z družbo easyJet iz leta 2004.
As in the case of the 2003 easyJet agreement, FBS’s ex ante forecasts were stress tested by the second expert which concluded that signing contracts with those airlines would still lead to incremental revenues exceeding incremental costs for each year of each contract over the period of application of the agreements (despite some more conservative conclusions).
Dogovor o najemu okenc za prijavo na let in pisarn je nasprotno od dogovora, ki ureja celotno delovanje letalskega prevoznika na letališču in njegovo glavno finančno razmerje z letališčem [73], povezan z zagotavljanjem dostopa do prostorov, na splošno pa se lahko šteje za razmeroma običajnega, vsaj na zadevnem letališču.
To reach that conclusion, the second expert carried out an analysis for each contract on the basis of those adjusted forecasts, which fully comply with the methodology described in sections 7.4.4 and 7.5.
Poleg tega so najemnine v takih pogodbah nižje v primerjavi z letališkimi pristojbinami, nepovratnimi sredstvi za trženje in drugimi finančnimi spodbudami.
The second expert exclusively based its review and adjustments on data and forecasts available to FBS when the opportunity to conclude the agreement was assessed.
Za upravljavca letališča niso zato nobena znatna spodbuda za določanje prilagojenih najemnin ali zahtevanje najvišje mogoče najemnine v pogajanjih z letalskimi prevozniki.
The ex ante NPVs calculated by the second expert for eight of the nine agreements concerned at the time when those agreements were concluded, over the period during which they were set to apply, is presented in Table 11 below:
Poslovni interes upravljavca letališča je prej ta, da združi dejavnosti zadevnega letalskega prevoznika na eni lokaciji in tako zagotovi operativno učinkovitost v korist svoje stranke, zlasti kadar upravljavec, kot v primeru družbe FBS, poskuša privabiti letalske prevoznike in jih spodbuditi k povečanju njihovega prometa.
Table 11
Zato v nasprotju s trditvami tretjih strani ne bi bilo nujno smiselno, da bi se območja letalskim prevoznikom dodeljevala na podlagi postopka oddaje javnega naročila.
NPVs of the agreements between FBS and various LCCs
Taka praksa je na evropskih letališčih očitno zelo neobičajna.
Period during which the agreement was set to apply
Ravnanje, pričakovano od preudarnega vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu, ki se ravna po možnostih donosa, je iskanje ustreznih območij glede zmogljivosti in drugih značilnosti za vsakega glavnega prevoznika na letališču ter zaračunavanje razumne najemnine v skladu z običajno prakso na letališču.
NPV over the duration of the agreement
Glede sistema za sprejem in odpremo prtljage so sistemi na terminalu A in terminalu B s tehničnega vidika enaki, razen enega elementa, tj. nepremičnega rentgenskega aparata, ki ga vključuje sistem na terminalu B. Aparat je bil vgrajen na zahtevo nemške zvezne policije.
(EUR)
V nasprotnem primeru bi bilo dovoljenje za poslovanje terminala B preklicano.
26 October 2003-31 March 2007
Tehnična oprema sistema za sprejem in odpremo prtljage na terminalu B družbi easyJet ne daje operativne prednosti, kot sta hitrejše ali učinkovitejše nalaganje/razlaganje prtljage.
As shown by this table, all these NPVs are positive.
Namesto tega nudi celostno metodo izvajanja rentgenskih pregledov, kar pa ne vpliva na postopke prijave na let, ki jih izvaja letalski prevoznik.
Therefore, it would have been rational for a prudent market economy operator guided by profitability prospects to accept the terms of these agreements at the date at which they were signed.
Vgrajen varnostni sistem namesto tega družbi easyJet povzroča operativne težave.
For the agreement with V-Bird [71], no NPV was calculated.
Če se zazna težava s kosom potnikove prtljage, zaradi česar jo je treba ročno preveriti, je treba potnika poklicati nazaj na varnostno območje na terminalu B. Takrat je potnik že v odhodnem terminalu, zato ga je treba o tem obvestiti in pripeljati nazaj.
The second expert pointed out that no ex ante business plan was available for this agreement.
To je zamuden postopek, zaradi česar je zadnji čas za prijavo, ki ga letališče Schönefeld uporablja za potnike na terminalu B, vsaj 30 minut.
However, the terms of this agreement are very similar to those of the agreement with Volare.
Družba easyJet trenutno uporablja časovno omejitev 40 minut, saj drugače ni nobenega jamstva, da se lahko postopek pravočasno zaključi.
The operations involved in both agreements were to generate a very close number of flight movements and the same type of aircraft.
Druga težava je povezana z dejstvom, da se sistema za sprejem in odpremo prtljage na terminalu B in terminalu A razlikujeta glede dovzetnosti za tehnične napake.
Moreover, at the time of the conclusion of these agreements, it was reasonable to assume that both companies would have a similar load factor.
Sistem za sprejem in odpremo prtljage na terminalu B je zaradi vgrajene varnostne tehnologije in njene večje zapletenosti v obdobju od maja do decembra 2004 deloval […] % časa delovanja, sistem na terminalu A pa je deloval […] % tega časa.
The incremental traffic to be expected from both agreements was thus similar.
Na podlagi navedenega se sklene, da nobena od določb dogovora o najemu z družbo easyJet iz leta 2004 zadevni družbi ni zagotovila gospodarske prednosti.
Finally, both agreements could be expected to lead to similar incremental operating costs for FBS.
Navedeni dogovor zato ne pomeni državne pomoči –
On the basis of the similarities between these two agreements, it was reasonable to conclude, that the V-Bird agreement complies with the market economy operator test.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
In any event, V-Bird suspended operations on 8 October 2004 and filed for and was subsequently declared bankrupt on 18 October 2004.
Člen 1
V-Bird was liquidated in early January 2005.
Naslednji ukrepi, ki jih je Nemčija izvedla za družbe iz točk (a)–(l), ne pomenijo državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije:
There is therefore no undertaking existing any more which would have benefited, either directly or indirectly, from any potential State aid involved in the V-Bird agreement.
dogovor o prenosu nadzora in dobička, ki sta ga 6. avgusta 1992 sklenili družbi Berlin Brandenburg Flughafen Holding GmbH in Berliner Flughafen-Gesellschaft mbH;
In view of the foregoing, none of the agreements listed in Table 6 involve State aid.
dogovor, ki sta ga 19. decembra 2003 sklenili družbi Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in easyJet Airline Company Ltd;
Assessment of the 2004 easyJet tenancy agreement (measure 4)
dogovor, ki sta ga 31. marca 2003 sklenili družbi Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in Ryanair Limited;
Certain interested parties have taken the view that the 2004 easyJet tenancy agreement provided easyJet with the exclusive use of Schönefeld’s Terminal B and prevented other airlines from having access to it.
dogovor, ki sta ga 28. aprila 2004 sklenili družbi Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in Ryanair Limited;
As indicated in recital 55, from 2004 to 2007, easyJet rented approximately […] m2 of office space and check-in desks, that is 24 % of the total floor area of Terminal B. The public areas of Terminal B (corridors, halls, coffee shop) are accessible to passengers of airlines other than easyJet, given the physical connection between Terminal B and Terminal A.
dogovor, ki sta ga 14. oktobra 2003 sklenili družbi Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in Germanwings GmbH;
Allocating check-in areas to specific airlines and granting branding and advertising rights to these airlines in the immediate surrounding areas are normal business practice at European and international airports and such arrangements are widespread.
dogovor, ki sta ga 23. decembra 2004 sklenili družbi Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in Germanwings GmbH;
Especially where an airline or an alliance of airlines carries a substantial number of passengers from or to a given airport, it is rational from an operational (and thus from a business) point of view that its activities are concentrated in a single terminal.
dogovor, ki sta ga 22. oktobra 2003 sklenili družbi Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in Volare Airlines S.p.A.;
This optimises the operational processes of both the airport and the airline.
dogovor, ki sta ga 3. novembra 2003 sklenili družbi Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in V-Bird Airlines B.V.;
Therefore, an airport manager does not necessarily confer an economic advantage on an airline by providing it with the exclusive use of all the check-in desks and office spaces at a Terminal.
dogovor, ki sta ga 6. junija 2004 sklenili družbi Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in Icelandair Reykjavik Airport;
This might possibly be the case only when the airport manager grants exclusive use of areas in excess of what the carrier needs (thereby preventing other airlines from using physically available capacity) or when an abnormally low rent is charged.
dogovor, ki sta ga 17. maja 2004 sklenili družbi Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in Norwegian Air Shuttle AS;
As shown below, the 2004 easyJet tenancy agreement fulfils none of those conditions.
dogovor, ki sta ga 13. maja 2004 sklenili družbi Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in Aer Lingus Limited;
Ever since it began flight operations at Schönefeld, easyJet has been by far the dominant airline.
dogovor o najemu, ki sta ga marca 2004 družbi Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in easyJet Airline Company Ltd sklenili za uporabo nekaterih območij in prostorov na terminalu B letališča Schönefeld.
Between 2004 to 2007 easyJet carried between […] % and […] % of all Schönefeld’s passengers.
Člen 2
It was anticipated already in 2003 that easyJet would be by far the largest carrier in terms of traffic.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo.
Indeed, because of easyJet’s contractual obligation to base a defined number of aircraft at Schönefeld, FBS was able to assume correspondingly large passenger numbers from the moment when easyJet began operations.
V Bruslju, 20. februarja 2014
According to the International Civil Aviation Organisation, the capacity of Terminal B was 600000 passengers per year, which is significantly lower than the number of passengers that easyJet was expected to carry from and to Schönefeld as of 2004 ([…] million [72]).
Za Komisijo
It is therefore clear that through the 2004 easyJet tenancy agreement, FBS was not engaging into any kind of ‘capacity hoarding’ strategy designed to prevent other airlines from competing against easyJet at Schönefeld.
Podpredsednik
In 2006, […] million passengers were handled at Terminal B, that is, more than twice as much as the theoretical capacity, without any major technical modifications.
Člena 87 oziroma 88 Pogodbe ES sta z učinkom od 1. decembra 2009 postala člen 107 oziroma člen 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The possibility to handle so many passengers arose in particular from the use of the terminal facility by one single carrier, which allowed for the optimisation of the passenger flows.
Člena sta vsebinsko enaka prejšnjima členoma.
Regarding the rental charge, it is meaningless to compare rental prices at different airports because of the differences in their capacity, market conditions, and the quality of the facilities.
V celotnem besedilu tega sklepa se uporablja terminologija PDEU.
The rental prices paid by easyJet were in fact in line with FBS’s rental charge grid, with no discount granted.
UL C 257, 30.10.2007, str.
At terminal B easyJet pays EUR […] per m2 for counter space and EUR […] per m2 for offices.
16.
Similar charges were agreed for similar facilities with other airlines at other terminals.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str.
Germanwings, for instance, also paid EUR […] per m2 for counter space at Terminal A. Aeroflot was charged EUR […] per m2 for an office at Terminal A. At Terminal B, Condor rented offices before easyJet and paid a lower rent for the same kind of premises in Terminal B. Whereas easyJet paid EUR […] per m2 for office space, Condor was charged EUR […] per m2 only.
1).
This type of comparison is appropriate to assess the existence of an economic advantage within the 2004 easyJet tenancy agreement.
Glej opombo 2.
Indeed, unlike an agreement governing the whole operations of an airline at an airport and its main financial relationships with the airport [73], a tenancy agreement for check-in desks and office spaces relates to the provision of access to relatively standard facilities, at least within one given airport.
Glej Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), 23.5.2003, št. 119, str.
Moreover, rents involved in such contracts account for minor amounts compared to airport charges, marketing grants and other financial incentives.
16 (http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/unternehmen/luftfahrt-privatisierung-der-berliner-flughaefen-endgueltig-gescheitert-1101944.html).
The commercial interest of the airport manager rather lies in the concentration of the operations of a given airline in one location to ensure operational efficiency to the benefit of its customer, especially when, as in the case of FBS, it tries to attract airlines and entice them to increase their traffic.
Dobiček pred odbitkom obresti in davkov.
Therefore, contrary to what third parties have argued, it would not necessarily make sense to allocate areas to airlines on the basis of calls for tender.
Navajanje poslovnih skrivnosti v smislu Sporočila Komisije C(2003) 4582 z dne 1. decembra 2003 o poklicni skrivnosti v odločbah o državni pomoči (UL C 297, 9.12.2003, str.
Such practice actually appears to be very unusual across European airports.
6).
The conduct expected from a rational airport operator guided by profitability prospects consists in finding appropriate areas for each main airline operating at the airport, in terms of capacity and other characteristics, and charge a reasonable rent in line with usual practices within the airport.
To zagotavljanje javnega financiranja je Komisija odobrila kot združljivo pomoč.
For these reasons, the level of a rent does not confer an economic advantage if it is broadly in line with the rents charged to other airlines within the airport.
Glej sklepa Komisije v zvezi z državno pomočjo v zadevah NN 25/09 (ex N 167/09) in SA.35378 (12/N) (UL C 36, 8.2.2013, str.
This is the case for the 2004 easyJet tenancy agreement.
10) – Nemčija – Financiranje mednarodnega letališča Berlin Brandenburg.
Furthermore, it is rational for an airport operator to conclude such contracts for a duration that is in line with the duration of the ‘main’ agreement governing the operations of the airline at the airport.
Nemčija je predložila naslednje informacije: (i) zmogljivost letališča Schönefeld je v letih 2003 in 2004 znašala 4,5 milijona potnikov na leto, leta 2005 pa je dosegla 7 milijonov potnikov na leto (v primerjavi s prometom v letih 2003, 2004 oziroma 2005, ko je obsegal 1,7 milijona, 3,3 milijona oziroma 5 milijonov potnikov); (ii) zmogljivost letališča Tegel je v letih 2003 in 2004 znašala 9,5 milijona potnikov na leto, leta 2005 pa je dosegla 11,5 milijona potnikov (v primerjavi s prometom v letih 2003, 2004 oziroma 2005, ko je obsegal 11,1 milijona, 11 milijonov oziroma 11,5 milijona potnikov).
This is the case fort the 2004 easyJet tenancy agreement.
Zmogljivost letališča je težko meriti, saj je odvisna od največje zmogljivosti različnih elementov infrastrukture, ki niso vedno ustrezno merjeni v smislu največjega števila potnikov, ampak so včasih merjeni tudi v smislu največjega števila premikov zrakoplovov.
As regards the baggage handling facility, the systems in place at Terminal A and Terminal B are identical from a technical viewpoint, except in one aspect: the facility at Terminal B includes a fixed X-ray machine.
Poleg tega je v primerih, ko je merilo število potnikov, največja zmogljivost v obliki omejitve potniškega prometa na uro, ne pa v obliki največjega števila potnikov na leto.
It was installed at the request of the German Federal police, which would otherwise have withdrawn the operating permit of Terminal B. The technical equipment of the baggage handling facility at Terminal B does not give easyJet any operational advantage, such as quicker or smoother loading/unloading of baggage.
Potniški promet je namreč precej različen glede na konične in nekonične ure in dneve, lahko pa se spreminja tudi glede na sezono.
Rather, it offers an integrated method of carrying out X-ray checks, but this has no impact on the airline’s check-in procedures.
Navedene informacije zato ne zajemajo popolnoma izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti letališč Schönefeld in Tegel.
In fact, the integrated security system rather causes operational difficulties for easyJet.
Poleg tega lahko letališča v nekaterih primerih delujejo prek svoje teoretične zmogljivosti (na primer zabeležijo več potnikov, kot je največji pretok na uro), kar pa lahko pomeni tudi slabše pogoje (dolge čakalne dobe, zamude itd.).
If a problem with a piece of passenger luggage is detected that requires a manual check, the passenger has to be called back to the control room at Terminal B. But by then the passenger will already be in the departure lounge and has to be informed and fetched back.
Ni pa sporno, da je v ocenjevanem obdobju letališče Tegel delovalo blizu polne zmogljivosti, letališče Schönefeld pa je bilo premalo izkoriščeno.
This is a cumbersome procedure which implies that the check-in acceptance time limit applied by Schönefeld for passengers at Terminal B is at least 30 minutes. easyJet currently applies a 40 minute time-limit, since there is otherwise no guarantee that the process can be completed on time.
Ključni najemnik je vodilni letalski prevoznik (glede prometa), ki je zelo cenjen in priznan, zato na letališče privabi druge letalske prevoznike, zaradi česar se poveča promet.
At Terminal A, by contrast, there is no need for this type of procedures.
„Etnični promet“ ustvarjajo prebivalci, ki izvirajo iz oddaljenih tujih držav in redno uporabljajo zračni prevoz za obiskovanje matičnih držav ali pa jih obiskujejo prijatelji ali sorodniki, ki iz teh držav prav tako potujejo z letali.
A 20 minute time-limit before take-off is common practice and poses no technical problems.
V Berlinu živijo velike skupine priseljencev prve in druge generacije.
Another difficulty relates to the fact that the baggage-handling facilities at Terminal B and Terminal A differ in their susceptibility to technical malfunction.
Berlin je bil takrat tretja največja turistična destinacija v Evropi z najvišjim številom prenočitev v Nemčiji, privabil pa je tudi velik delež izletnikov.
Owing to the integrated security technology, with the greater complexity it entails, the baggage-handling facility at Terminal B was working for […] % of the operating hours during the period from May to December 2004, whereas the facility at Terminal A was ready for service for […] % of the time.
Promet nizkocenovnih prevoznikov v Evropi se je v začetku tisočletja znatno povečal zaradi donosne širitve vodilnih družb v industriji, tj. Ryanair in easyJet, ter številnih novih akterjev.
From all of the foregoing, it is concluded that none of the provisions of the 2004 easyJet tenancy agreement resulted in an economic advantage being conferred on easyJet.
Podrobnejši opis ocene, ki jo je podal svetovalec, je v oddelku 7.2.1.
Therefore, that agreement does not constitute State aid,
To „financiranje za rast“ ni enako „spodbudi za rast“ iz seznama iz leta 2004.