natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
One interested party noted that the investigation showed that exporting producers almost exclusively sell to independent distributors or steel service centres, while the Union industry sold to distributors, integrated service centres and end users.
Ena zainteresirana stran je navedla, da je preiskava pokazala, da proizvajalci izvozniki skoraj izključno prodajajo neodvisnim distributerjem ali storitvenim centrom za jeklarstvo, medtem ko je industrija Unije prodajala distributerjem, integriranim storitvenim centrom in končnim uporabnikom.
This interested party claims that in order to compare those prices, the Commission must consider the fixed costs of the service centres as there is a difference in the level of trade.
Ta zainteresirana stran trdi, da mora Komisija za primerjavo teh cen upoštevati fiksne stroške storitvenih centrov, saj obstaja razlika v ravni trgovanja.
However, an adjustment for differences in the level of trade can only be made if it is demonstrated that there are consistent and distinct differences in price between those levels of trade, and not on the basis of cost differences.
Vendar se lahko prilagoditev zaradi razlik v ravneh trgovanja izvede le, če se dokažejo stalne in očitne razlike v ceni med navedenima ravnema trgovanja, ne pa na osnovi razlik v stroških.
The actual comparison of prices on which the Union industry sold to both levels of trade on the Union market showed that, as indicated in recital 112 of the provisional Regulation, the difference in level of trade had no impact on prices.
Dejanska primerjava cen, po katerih je industrija Unije prodajala obema ravnema trgovanja na trgu Unije, je pokazala, da razlika v ravneh trgovanja ni vplivala na cene, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 112 začasne uredbe.
No information rebutting this finding was provided by any interested party.
Nobena zainteresirana stran ni poslala informacij, ki bi ovrgle to ugotovitev.
The conditions for a level of trade adjustment are therefore not met in this case.
Zato pogoji za prilagoditev ravni trgovanja v tem primeru niso izpolnjeni.
Following final disclosure, the same party argued that a comparison of the sales prices of the Union industry's service centres with the prices of the exporting producers does allegedly not compare comparable products.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ista stran trdila, da se s primerjavo prodajnih cen storitvenih centrov industrije Unije in cen proizvajalcev izvoznikov domnevno ne primerjajo primerljivi izdelki.
In this respect, the party alleged that the sales of the Union industry's service centres are to a large extent further processed goods such as strips, narrow coils and discs, while the exporters are mainly selling standard coils.
V zvezi s tem je trdila, da storitveni centri industrije Unije prodajajo večinoma nadalje predelano blago, kot so trakovi, ozki kolobarji in diski, medtem ko izvozniki večinoma prodajajo standardne kolobarje.
In this respect it is noted that standard coils were not compared with narrow products such as strips or narrow coils.
V zvezi s tem je treba navesti, da se standardni kolobarji niso primerjali z ozkimi izdelki, kot so trakovi ali ozki kolobarji.
The width of the product was one element in the PCN, ensuring that only products with a similar width were compared.
Širina izdelka je bila en element v kontrolni številki izdelka, ki je zagotovil, da se primerjajo le izdelki podobne širine.
As regards discs, they were not included in the comparison at all since they were not exported by the sampled exporting producers to the Union.
Diski pa v primerjavo sploh niso bili vključeni, saj jih vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki niso izvažali v Unijo.
In the absence of other comments regarding the prices of the imports from the countries concerned and price undercutting, other conclusions reached in recitals 107 to 112 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi s cenami uvoza iz zadevnih držav in nelojalnim nižanjem prodajnih cen, se potrdijo drugi sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 107 do 112 začasne uredbe.
Interested parties reiterated their claims that the data of the sampled Union producers should be consistently used for the injury assessment instead of dividing the indicators into macroeconomic indicators and microeconomic indicators.
Zainteresirane strani so ponovile svoje trditve, da bi se morali podatki vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije pri oceni škode uporabljati dosledno, namesto da se kazalniki delijo na makro- in mikroekonomske kazalnike.
However, such an approach would disregard available information at Union industry's level concerning namely production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, sales volume, market share, growth, employment, productivity and magnitude of the dumping margin.
Vendar se pri takem pristopu ne bi upoštevale razpoložljive informacije na ravni industrije Unije, zlasti glede proizvodnje, proizvodne zmogljivosti, izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, obsega prodaje, tržnega deleža, rasti, zaposlenosti, produktivnosti in višine stopnje dampinga.
Following final disclosure, one interested party reiterated their argument that the fact that the largest Union producer Outokumpu is not part of the sample distorts the injury analysis.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran ponovila svojo trditev, da analizo škode izkrivlja dejstvo, da največji proizvajalec Unije, tj. družba Outokumpu, ni del vzorca.
However, as already indicated in recital 93 of the provisional Regulation, the sample was considered representative, as the sample represented around 50 % of the total Union production of the like product.
Kot je bilo že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 93 začasne uredbe, je vzorec veljal za reprezentativnega, saj je predstavljal približno 50 % celotne proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
Therefore, the fact that Outokumpu did not cooperate in the investigation does not affect the representativeness of the selected sample and the quality of the verified data of the sampled producers.
Zato dejstvo, da družba Outokumpu ni sodelovala v preiskavi, ne vpliva na reprezentativnost izbranega vzorca in kakovost preverjenih podatkov vzorčenih proizvajalcev.
Interested parties argued that when the injury indicators are divided into macroeconomic and microeconomic indicators, one cannot draw any meaningful conclusion as to what extent the sampled producers had suffered injury (if any).
Zainteresirane strani so trdile, da pri delitvi kazalnikov škode na makro- in mikroekonomske kazalnike ni mogoče sprejeti nobenega smiselnega sklepa glede tega, v kolikšnem obsegu so vzorčeni proizvajalci utrpeli škodo (če so jo).
This argument is beside the point.
Ta trditev ni pomembna.
In accordance with Article 3 of the basic Regulation the determination of injury is made at the Union industry's level.
V skladu s členom 3 osnovne uredbe se škoda določi na ravni industrije Unije.
Sampling is a technique provided for in Article 17 of the basic Regulation that allows the Commission to limit the number of investigated parties (in this case the Union producers) when that number is large.
Vzorčenje je tehnika iz člena 17 osnovne uredbe, ki Komisiji omogoča, da v primeru velikega števila strank v preiskavi (v tem primeru so to proizvajalci Unije) omeji njihovo število.
However, the sampling does not limit the determination of the injury to the sample of Union producers.
Vendar vzorčenje ne omejuje določanja škode na vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
Certain injury indicators, such as, inter alia, market share and sales volume, are only meaningfully analysed at Union industry's level only.
Nekateri kazalniki škode, kot sta med drugim tržni delež in obseg prodaje, se smiselno analizirajo le na ravni industrije Unije.
Moreover, findings with regard to the sample are considered representative for the Union industry's level.
Poleg tega se ugotovitve v zvezi z vzorcem štejejo kot reprezentativne za raven industrije Unije.
Therefore, any available information concerning the Union industry as a whole should be considered.
Zato bi bilo treba proučiti vse informacije, ki so na voljo za celotno industrijo Unije.
In the absence of any additional comments regarding the general remarks on the economic situation of the Union industry, the conclusions reached in recitals 107 to 112 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih dodatnih pripomb v zvezi s splošnimi opombami o gospodarskem položaju industrije Unije, se potrdijo sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 107 do 112 začasne uredbe.
Concerning employment, interested parties argued that the decrease in employment was due to an increasing productivity of the Union industry.
Zainteresirane strani so glede zaposlenosti trdile, da je zmanjšanje zaposlenosti posledica povečanja produktivnosti industrije Unije.
However, the increase of productivity of 6 % throughout the period considered was far lower that the decrease of employment of 11 %.
Vendar je bilo 6-odstotno povečanje produktivnosti v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju precej nižje od zmanjšanja zaposlenosti, ki je znašalo 11 %.
This decrease is also influenced by the Union industry's production volume, which decreased by 5 % in a growing market.
Na to zmanjšanje je vplival tudi obseg proizvodnje industrije Unije, ki se je na rastočem trgu zmanjšal za 5 %.
As described above, due to the dumped imports from the countries concerned, the Union industry had to reduce their production in a growing market.
Kot je bilo opisano zgoraj, je morala industrija Unije zaradi dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav zmanjšati svojo proizvodnjo na rastočem trgu.
If the Union industry would have been able to benefit from the market growth and increase its production in line with the increasing demand, this increased production would have counterbalanced the increasing productivity.
Če bi industrija Unije lahko izkoristila rast trga in povečala svojo proizvodnjo v skladu z večjim povpraševanjem, bi ta večja proizvodnja pomenila protiutež večji produktivnosti.
The resulting loss in employment would have been substantially lower.
Posledično zmanjšanje zaposlenosti bi bilo precej nižje.
Following final disclosure, an interested party argued that the employment of the Union industry significantly increased by 55 % since the period between 2004 and 2007.
Teh podatkov pa ni mogoče primerjati in ne kažejo naraščajočega trenda za zaposlenost.
However, the employment figure stated in the provisional Regulation is the employment of the Union industry as a whole, while the employment figure given for the period between 2004 and 2007 only relates to part of the Union industry.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z makroekonomskimi kazalniki, se potrdijo sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 121 do 132 začasne uredbe.
These figures are therefore not comparable and do not show an increasing trend for employment.
Mikroekonomski kazalniki
In the absence of other comments regarding the macroeconomic indicators, the conclusions reached in recitals 121 to 132 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Cene in dejavniki, ki vplivajo na cene
Microeconomic indicators
Zainteresirane strani so ponovile svoje trditve, da prodajne cene izhajajo iz stroškov surovin, zlasti kroma in niklja, in da bi bilo treba iz analize trenda cen industrije Unije izključiti „dodatne dajatve na zlitine“.
Prices and factors affecting prices
Te strani so poslale dodatne informacije glede nihanja osnovne cene iz uvodne izjave 141 začasne uredbe.
Interested parties reiterated their claims that sales prices follow the raw material costs, mainly chromium and nickel, and that the trend of the Union industry's prices should be analysed excluding the ‘alloy surcharge’.
Podatki so se nanašali na hladno valjane ploščate izdelke iz nerjavnega jekla vrste 304, debeline 2 mm in s končno obdelavo 2B, ki jih prodajajo proizvajalci Unije [6].
These parties submitted additional information with regard to the base price fluctuation, referred to in recital 141 of the provisional Regulation.
Po teh podatkih se je osnovna cena v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju nenehno nižala in se znižala za približno 11 %, in sicer s 1015 EUR/tono v letu 2010 na 907 EUR/tono v obdobju preiskave.
The data concerned the grade 304 SSCR with a thickness of 2 mm with finishing 2B sold by the Union producers [6].
Stopnja znižanja je nižja od znižanja s 1200 EUR/tono na 1000 EUR/tono, kot je navedeno v začasni uredbi, vendar potrjuje ugotovitev o precejšnjem nižanju osnovne cene.
According to these data, the base price continuously decreased throughout the period considered by around 11 % from 1015 EUR/tonne in 2010 to 907 EUR/tonne in the investigation period.
Zainteresirana stran je tudi trdila, da dokaz iz uvodne izjave 141 začasne uredbe v zvezi z analizo osnovne cene ne zadostuje za utemeljitev ugotovitve, da se je osnovna cena za industrijo Unije v obravnavanem obdobju znižala, saj naj bi jo predstavil le en proizvajalec Unije.
The level of the decrease is lower than the decrease from 1200 EUR/tonne to 1000 EUR/tonne mentioned in the provisional Regulation, but supports the finding of a significantly decreasing base price.
Čeprav je informacije predstavil en proizvajalec Unije, se ne nanašajo le na enega proizvajalca Unije.
An interested party also claimed that the evidence provided in recital 141 of the provisional Regulation regarding the analysis of the base price is insufficient to support the finding that the base price has declined over the period considered for the Union industry, as it was allegedly presented by only one Union producer.
Dejansko gre za informacije družbe CRU, ki je splošno znana družba za svetovanje jeklarski industriji.
While the information was presented by one Union producer, it does not refer to one Union producer only.
Družba CRU je objavila informacije o celotnem nemškem trgu in ne o cenah posameznih proizvajalcev Unije.
Indeed, this information refers to information published by CRU, a widely-known consultancy for the steel industry.
Poleg tega so dejstvo, da so se osnovne cene nenehno nižale v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju, potrdile informacije, ki so jih predložile druge zainteresirane strani, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 97 zgoraj.
CRU published the information for the German market as a whole, and not for prices of individual Union producers.
Zato ugotavljamo, da je znižanje prodajnih cen industrije Unije posledica zmanjšanja stroškov surovin in znatnega znižanja osnovne cene, ki pa ni povezano z razvojem stroškov surovin.
In addition, the fact that base prices continuously decreased throughout the period considered was confirmed by information provided by other interested parties, as mentioned in recital 97 above.
Iz znižanja osnovne cene je razvidno, da je morala industrija Unije nadalje zniževati cene v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju, kljub temu da je imela izgubo zaradi pritiska na cene, ki se je izvajal z dampinškim uvozom iz zadevnih držav.
It is therefore concluded that the decreasing sales prices of the Union industry are caused both by the decreasing raw material costs and the significant decrease of the base price which is unrelated to raw material cost developments.
Po dokončnem razkritju je uvoznik trdil, da so prej navedene informacije glede gibanja osnovne cene sestavljene iz „subjektivnih mnenj“ evropskega proizvajalca, ki bi jih bilo treba nadalje preveriti.
The latter part of the price decrease, namely the decrease of the base price, shows that the Union industry had to further decrease prices throughout the period considered despite being loss-making due to the price pressure exerted by the dumped imports from the countries concerned.
Vendar informacij iz uvodne izjave 97 zgoraj ni navedel evropski proizvajalec, pač pa združenje izvoznikov – stranka, ki je nasprotovala uvedbi ukrepov.
Following final disclosure, an importer claimed that the information concerning the base price development given above consists of ‘subjective opinions’ of the European producer which should be further verified.
Ker so te informacije skladne z javno dostopnimi informacijami, ki so jih poslale specializirane družbe za svetovanje, se štejejo za zanesljive.
Since this information is in line with publically available information provided by specialized consultancies, it is considered reliable.
Po dokončnem razkritju je zainteresirana stran opozorila na to, da je bila glede na preglednico 11 začasne uredbe povprečna prodajna cena na enoto industrije Unije v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju vedno višja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto.
Following final disclosure, another interested party argued that the decreasing base price was largely due to an exceptionally high value for the second quarter of 2010.
Ta razlika naj bi pomenila, da izgube, ki so jih utrpeli proizvajalci Unije, niso pojasnjene.
The party did provide no arguments why this period should be disregarded for the analysis of the base price development.
V zvezi s tem navajamo, da so bili v stroške proizvodnje na enoto iz preglednice 11 začasne uredbe vključeni le stroški proizvodnje brez prodaje, upravnih in splošnih stroškov.
Since the analysis of the injury indicators has to cover the whole period considered, this argument cannot be accepted.
Zato iz neposredne primerjave teh stroškov na enoto in prodajne cene na enoto ne more biti razviden dobiček vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
Following final disclosure, an interested party pointed out that according to Table 11 of the provisional Regulation, the average unit sales price of the Union industry was always above the unit cost of production throughout the period considered.
Zaloge
This difference allegedly means that the losses suffered by the Union producers are unexplained.
Zainteresirane strani so navedle pripombe glede 7-odstotnega znižanja zalog v obravnavanem obdobju, kar je bilo po njihovem mnenju znak dobrega stanja industrije Unije.
In this respect it is noted that the unit cost of production in Table 11 of the provisional Regulation only included the cost of production without selling, administrative and general expenses.
Vendar je 7-odstotno znižanje zalog v obravnavanem obdobju zgolj posledica obsega proizvodnje vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
Therefore, a direct comparison of this unit cost with the unit sales price cannot show the profit achieved of the sampled Union producers.
Raven zalog v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju je dejansko predstavljala približno 15 % proizvodnje, kot je prikazano v preglednici 13 začasne uredbe.
Inventories
Manjša nihanja med 14 % in 16 % je treba zaradi njihove zmerne stopnje šteti za običajno nihanje zalog.
Interested parties commented on the 7 % decrease in inventories in the period considered, considering it an indication of a healthy situation of the Union industry.
Zainteresirane strani so nadalje trdile, da je 15-odstotna raven zalog letne proizvodnje, kar ustreza približno dvomesečnemu prihodku od prodaje, visoka za industrijo, ki proizvaja večinoma po naročilu.
However, the decrease in inventories of 7 % in the period considered is merely following the production output of the sampled Union producers.
Taka raven zalog nastane zaradi časovne razlike med proizvodnjo in različnimi stopnjami procesa prodaje ter različnih vzorcev prodaje.
Indeed, as shown in Table 13 of the provisional Regulation, the level of inventories accounted for around 15 % of the production throughout the period considered.
Zato se 15-odstotna raven zalog proizvodnje ne more šteti za zelo visoko.
The minor fluctuations between 14 % and 16 %, given their moderate level, should be considered normal variations in inventories.
Komisija potrjuje, da zaloge niso pomemben kazalnik za preiskavo.
Furthermore, interested parties argued that an inventory level of 15 % of annual production, translating into about 2 months' turnover, is high for an industry that produces mainly on order.
Naložbe
This inventory level is caused by the time difference between production and different stages of the sales process as well as different sales patterns.
Zainteresirane strani so pojasnile, da je industrija Unije v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju izvedla obsežene naložbe, ki so presegale eno milijardo EUR na leto.
Therefore, the stock level of 15 % of production cannot be considered particularly high.
Komisija je glede te trditve ugotovila, da je stopnja naložb iz začasne uredbe dejansko stopnja skupne neto knjigovodske vrednosti sredstev.
The Commission confirms that the inventories are not considered a meaningful indicator for the purposes of the investigation.
Dejanska stopnja naložb je navedena v spodnji preglednici, s katero se nadomešča ustrezna vrstica v preglednici 14 začasne uredbe:
Investments
Preglednica 3
Interested parties commented that the Union industry carried out massive investments exceeding one billion EUR/year during the whole period considered.
Naložbe, vsi proizvajalci Unije (del kazalnikov škode)
The Commission established with regard to this claim that the level of investments referred to in the provisional Regulation was in fact the level of the total net book value of assets.
Obdobje preiskave
The actual level of investments is given in the table below, that replaces the respective line in Table 14 in the provisional Regulation:
Naložbe (v EUR)
Table 3
Indeks (2010 = 100)
Investments, all Union producers (part of the injury indicators)
Čeprav se je ta kazalnik škode v obravnavanem obdobju nominalno izboljšal, ne vpliva na splošno negativno oceno škode Komisije, saj se je ta kazalnik v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju zniževal.
Index (2010 = 100)
Popravek kazalnika za naložbe zato nima nobenega učinka na donosnost naložb.
Actual investments increased by 89 percentage points from 37 million EUR in 2010 to 70 million EUR in 2012, subsequently decreasing by 47 percentage points to 53 million EUR during the period considered.
Zato donosnosti naložb ni treba popraviti, kot je bilo pravilno navedeno v začasni uredbi.
However, this nominal increase is due to a very low level of investments in 2010.
Po dokončnem razkritju je zainteresirana stran trdila, da je skupna naložba v višini 209 milijonov EUR v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju v nasprotju z vedenjem družb, ki so utrpele škodo.
Indeed, the level of investments was so low that the net book value of assets continuously decreased throughout the period considered, as shown in Table 14 of the provisional Regulation.
Vendar, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 110 zgoraj, se je stopnja naložb v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju zniževala.
Even though this injury indicator nominally improved during the period considered, it does not affect the Commission's overall negative injury assessment as this indicator was depressed throughout the period considered.
Zato te trditve ni mogoče sprejeti.
Following final disclosure, an interested party argued that after revising the investments, the indicator for ‘return on investment’ should be equally revised.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z mikroekonomskimi kazalniki, se potrdijo drugi sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 135 do 151 začasne uredbe.
However, the indicator for return on investment is the profit in percentage of the net book value of investments, as stated in recital 150 of the provisional Regulation.
Sklep o škodi
Revising the indicator for investments therefore has no impact on the return on investment.
Na podlagi navedenega in, ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se potrdijo sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 152 do 155 začasne uredbe, in sicer, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
As a consequence, the return on investment does not have to be revised as it was correctly stated in the provisional Regulation.
VZROČNA ZVEZA
Following final disclosure, an interested party argued that a total investment of 209 million EUR throughout the period considered is contrary to the behaviour of injured companies.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 3(6) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali je dampinški uvoz iz zadevnih držav povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije.
However, as indicated in recital 110 above, the level of investments was depressed throughout the period considered.
V skladu s členom 3(7) osnovne uredbe je proučila, ali bi tudi drugi znani dejavniki lahko istočasno povzročili škodo industriji Unije.
The argument therefore cannot be accepted.
Komisija je zagotovila, da se morebitna škoda, ki so jo povzročili drugi dejavniki in ne dampinški uvoz iz zadevnih držav, ni pripisala temu dampinškemu uvozu.