natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union [3] as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.
Ker zadevna sprememba ni manjša v smislu člena 53(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012, je Komisija v skladu s členom 50(2)(a) navedene uredbe zahtevek za spremembo objavila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Arroz de Valencia’/‘Arròs de València’ (PDO) are hereby approved.
Sprememba specifikacije, objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije v zvezi z imenom „Arroz de Valencia“/„Arròs de València“ (ZOP), se odobri.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1971/2001 of 9 October 2001 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 on the entry of certain names in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 269, 10.10.2001, p. 5).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1971/2001 z dne 9. oktobra 2001 o dopolnitvi Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 2400/96 o vnosu nekaterih imen v Register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb, določen v Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2081/92 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila (UL L 269, 10.10.2001, str. 5).
OJ C 277, 22.8.2014, p. 6.
UL C 277, 22.8.2014, str. 6.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/100
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/100
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Halberstädter Würstchen (PGI))
o odobritvi večje spremembe specifikacije za ime, vpisano v registru zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Halberstädter Würstchen (ZGO))
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Germany's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Halberstädter Würstchen’, registered under Commission Regulation (EU) No 895/2010 [2].
Komisija je v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 53(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 preučila zahtevek Nemčije za odobritev spremembe specifikacije za zaščiteno geografsko označbo „Halberstädter Würstchen“, registrirano na podlagi Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 895/2010 [2].
Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union [3] as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.
Ker zadevna sprememba ni manjša v smislu člena 53(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012, je Komisija v skladu s členom 50(2)(a) navedene uredbe zahtevek za spremembo objavila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,
Ker v skladu s členom 51 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Komisija ni prejela nobene izjave o ugovoru, bi bilo treba spremembo specifikacije odobriti –
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Halberstädter Würstchen’ (PGI) are hereby approved.
Sprememba specifikacije, objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije v zvezi z imenom „Halberstädter Würstchen“ (ZGO), se odobri.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 895/2010 of 8 October 2010 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Halberstädter Würstchen (PGI)) (OJ L 266, 9.10.2010, p. 42).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 895/2010 z dne 8. oktobra 2010 o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Halberstädter Würstchen (ZGO)) (UL L 266, 9.10.2010, str. 42).
OJ C 270, 19.8.2014, p. 4.
UL C 270, 19.8.2014, str. 4.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/101
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/101
of 22 January 2015
z dne 22. januarja 2015
Done at Brussels, 22 January 2015.
V Bruslju, 22. januarja 2015
Council Regulation (EU) 2015/104
Uredba Sveta (EU) 2015/104
fixing for 2015 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters, amending Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 779/2014
o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti za leto 2015 za nekatere staleže rib in skupine staležev rib, ki veljajo za vode Unije in za plovila Unije v nekaterih vodah zunaj Unije, o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 43/2014 ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 779/2014
Article 43(3) of the Treaty provides that the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, is to adopt measures on the fixing and allocation of fishing opportunities.
V členu 43(3) Pogodbe je določeno, da Svet na predlog Komisije sprejme ukrepe o določitvi in dodelitvi ribolovnih možnosti.
Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [1] requires that conservation measures be adopted taking into account available scientific, technical and economic advice, including, where relevant, reports drawn up by the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) and other advisory bodies, as well as in the light of any advice received from Advisory Councils.
Uredba (EU) št. 1380/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [1] vsebuje zahtevo, da se ohranitveni ukrepi sprejmejo ob upoštevanju razpoložljivih znanstvenih, tehničnih in gospodarskih mnenj, kjer je ustrezno vključno s poročili, ki jih pripravi Znanstveni, tehnični in gospodarski odbor za ribištvo (STECF) in drugi svetovalni organi ter v okviru mnenja, ki so ga podali svetovalni sveti.
It is incumbent upon the Council to adopt measures on the fixing and allocation of fishing opportunities, including certain conditions functionally linked thereto, as appropriate.
Svet je zadolžen za sprejetje ukrepov o določitvi in dodelitvi ribolovnih možnosti, po potrebi vključno z nekaterimi pogoji, ki so funkcionalno povezani s tem.
The total allowable catch (TACs) should therefore be established, in line with Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, on the basis of available scientific advice, taking into account biological and socio-economic aspects whilst ensuring fair treatment between fishing sectors, as well as in the light of the opinions expressed during the consultation of stakeholders, in particular at the meetings of the Advisory Councils.
Kadar za ribolov v regiji, ki jo zajema ta uredba, velja obveznost iztovarjanja, bi bilo treba iztovoriti vse vrste, ulovljene v okviru tega ribolova in za katere veljajo omejitve ulova.
The landing obligation referred to in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 is introduced on a fishery-by-fishery basis.
Od 1. januarja 2015 se obveznost iztovarjanja uporablja za ribolov malih pelagičnih vrst (tj. ribolov skuše, sleda, šura, sinjega mola, merjaščevke, sardona, srebrenke, sardele in papaline), velikih pelagičnih vrst (tj. ribolov navadnega tuna, mečarice, belega tuna, veleokega tuna ter sinje in bele jadrovnice) ter ribolov za industrijske namene (npr. ribolov kapelana, peščenke in norveškega moliča).
In the region covered by this Regulation, when a fishery falls under the landing obligation, all species in that fishery subject to catch limits should be landed.
V členu 16(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013 je določeno, da se morajo ob uvedbi obveznosti iztovarjanja za ribji stalež ribolovne možnosti določiti tako, da se upošteva razlika med določanjem ribolovnih možnosti, ki odražajo iztovarjanje, in določanjem ribolovnih možnosti, ki odražajo ulove.
As of 1 January 2015, the landing obligation applies to small pelagic fisheries (i.e. fisheries for mackerel, herring, horse mackerel, blue whiting, boarfish, anchovy, argentine, sardine and sprat), to large pelagic fisheries (i.e. fisheries for bluefin tuna, swordfish, albacore tuna, bigeye tuna and blue and white marlin), to fisheries for industrial purposes (e.g. fisheries for capelin, sandeel and Norwegian pout).
Nekatere stopnje celotnega dovoljenega ulova za staleže morskih psov in skatov (morski psi in raže) so bile za nekaj let določene na 0, s tem pa je povezana še določba o vzpostavitvi obveznosti takojšnjega izpusta naključnega ulova.
Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 provides that, when the landing obligation in respect of a fish stock is introduced, fishing opportunities are to be fixed taking into account the change from fixing fishing opportunities that reflect landings to fixing fishing opportunities that reflect catches.
Razlog za to posebno obravnavo je v tem, da so ti staleži v slabem stanju ohranjenosti, poleg tega pa zaradi njihove visoke stopnje preživetja zavržki ne bodo povečali stopenj umrljivosti za te vrste; zavržki se obravnavajo kot koristni za ohranitev teh vrst.
For some years, certain TACs for stocks of elasmobranchs (skates, sharks, rays) have been set at 0, with a linked provision establishing an obligation to immediately release accidental catches.
Vendar bo od 1. januarja 2015 ulove teh vrst pri pelagičnem ribolovu treba iztovoriti, razen če zanje ne velja katero od odstopanj od obveznosti iztovarjanja, predvidenih v členu 15 Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013.
The reason for this specific treatment is that those stocks are in a poor conservation status and, because of their high survival rates, discards will not raise fishing mortality rates for them; discards are deemed as beneficial for the conservation of these species.
S členom 15(4)(a) navedene uredbe so omogočena taka odstopanja za vrste, katerih ulov je prepovedan in ki so kot take opredeljene v pravnem aktu Unije, sprejetem na področju skupne ribiške politike.
As of 1 January 2015, however, catches of these species in pelagic fisheries will have to be landed, unless they are covered by any of the derogations from the landing obligation foreseen in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Zato je primerno ribolov teh vrst na zadevnih območjih prepovedati.
Article 15(4)(a) of that Regulation allows such derogations for species in respect of which fishing is prohibited and which are identified as such in a Union legal act adopted in the area of the Common Fisheries Policy.
V zadnjih letih se je celotni dovoljeni ulov za sardona v Biskajskem zalivu določal v ločeni uredbi o ribolovnih možnostih z veljavnostjo od 1. julija določenega leta do 30. junija naslednjega leta.
Therefore, it is appropriate to prohibit the fishing of these species in the areas concerned.
Leta 2014 je STECF sklenil, da bi sprememba obdobja upravljanja na običajno koledarsko leto (od januarja do decembra) bistveno ublažila tveganje za ohranitev tega staleža.
In recent years, the TAC for anchovy in the Bay of Biscay has been set in a separate fishing opportunities regulation applicable from 1 July of one year to 30 June of the following year.
Po posvetovanju s Španijo, Francijo in svetovalnim svetom za jugozahodne vode (SWWAC) je bila sprememba, ki jo je predlagal STECF, pozitivno ocenjena.
In 2014, STECF concluded that changing the management period to a normal calendar year (January to December) considerably reduces conservation risks for this stock.
Na podlagi tega je primerno razveljaviti Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 779/2014 [2] in v tej uredbi uvesti nov celotni dovoljeni ulov za stalež sardona v Biskajskem zalivu za leto 2015.
Following consultations with Spain, France and the South Western Waters Advisory Council (SWWAC), the change proposed by STECF was positively assessed.
Poleg tega bi bilo v skladu s členom 16(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013 treba celotni dovoljeni ulov za staleže, za katere veljajo posebni večletni načrti, določiti v skladu s pravili iz teh načrtov.
On this basis it is appropriate to repeal Council Regulation (EU) No 779/2014 [2] and to introduce a new TAC for the stock of anchovy in the Bay of Biscay for 2015 in this Regulation.
Zato bi bilo celotni dovoljeni ulov za staleže južnega osliča in škampa, morskega lista v zahodnem Rokavskem prelivu, morske plošče in morskega lista v Severnem morju, sleda v vodah zahodno od Škotske, trske v Kattegatu, zahodno od Škotske, v Irskem morju, Severnem morju, Skagerraku in vzhodnem Rokavskem preli vu ter staleže modroplavutega tuna v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemskem morju treba določiti v skladu s pravili, določenimi v uredbah Sveta (ES) št. 2166/2005 [3], (ES) št. 509/2007 [4], (ES) št. 676/2007 [5], (ES) št. 1300/2008 [6], (ES) št. 1342/2008 [7] („načrt za trsko“) in (ES) št. 302/2009 [8].
In addition, pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, for stocks subject to specific multiannual plans the TACs should be established in accordance with the rules laid down in those plans.
Kar zadeva staleže severnega osliča (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 811/2004 [9]) in morskega lista v Biskajskem zalivu (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 388/2006 [10]), so bili doseženi minimalni cilji zadevnih načrtov obnovitve in upravljanja, zato je primerno upoštevati dano znanstveno mnenje, da bi se bodisi dosegli bodisi ohranili celotni dovoljeni ulov na ravneh največjega trajnostnega donosa.
Consequently, the TACs for stocks of Southern hake and Norway lobster, of sole in the Western Channel, of plaice and sole in the North Sea, of herring to the west of Scotland, of cod in the Kattegat, to the west of Scotland, the Irish Sea, the North Sea, Skagerrak and the Eastern Channel and of bluefin tuna in the Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean should be established in accordance with the rules laid down in Council Regulations (EC) No 2166/2005 [3], (EC) No 509/2007 [4], (EC) No 676/2007 [5], (EC) No 1300/2008 [6], (EC) No 1342/2008 [7] (the ‘Cod Plan’) and (EC) No 302/2009 [8].
V primeru staležev, za katere ni zadostnih ali zanesljivih podatkov za oceno njihove velikosti, bi morali biti ukrepi upravljanja in stopnje celotni dovoljeni ulov v skladu s previdnostnim pristopom k upravljanju ribištva, kot je opredeljen v členu 4(1)(8) Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013, ob upoštevanju dejavnikov, značilnih za posamezne staleže, še posebej razpoložljivih informacij o gibanju staležev ter dejavnikih mešanega ribolova.
With regard, however, to the stocks of northern hake (Council Regulation (EC) No 811/2004 [9]) and sole in the Bay of Biscay (Council Regulation (EC) No 388/2006 [10]), the minimum targets of the relevant recovery and management plans have been reached and, therefore, it is appropriate to follow scientific advice provided in order to achieve or maintain the TACs at maximum sustainable yield levels, as the case may be.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 847/96 [11] so bili določeni dodatni pogoji za upravljanje celotnega dovoljenega ulova iz leta v leto, vključno z določbami glede prilagodljivosti iz členov 3 in 4 za previdnostne oziroma analitične staleže.
For stocks for which there is no sufficient or reliable data in order to provide size estimates, management measures and TAC levels should follow the precautionary approach to fisheries management as defined in Article 4(1)(8) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, while taking into account stock-specific factors, including, in particular, available information on stock trends and mixed fisheries considerations.
V skladu s členom 2 navedene uredbe Svet pri določanju celotnega dovoljenega ulova zlasti na podlagi biološkega statusa staležev odloči, za katere staleže se člena 3 in 4 ne uporabljata.
Council Regulation (EC) No 847/96 [11] introduced additional conditions for year-to-year management of TACs, including flexibility provisions under Articles 3 and 4 for precautionary and analytical stocks respectively.
Nedavno je bil s členom 15(9) Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013 uveden mehanizem prilagodljivosti za vse ulove, za katere velja obveznost iztovarjanja.
Under Article 2 of that Regulation, when fixing the TACs, the Council is to decide to which stocks Articles 3 and 4 do not apply, in particular on the basis of the biological status of the stocks.
Da bi se preprečila prekomerna prilagodljivost, kar bi spodkopalo cilje ohranjanja iz skupne ribiške politike, in preprečili negativni vplivi na biološko stanje staležev, se lahko člena 3 in 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 847/96 uporabljata za celotni dovoljeni ulov le, če države članice ne uporabijo vsakoletne prilagodljivosti, določene v členu 15(9) Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013.
More recently, a flexibility mechanism was introduced for all catches covered by the landing obligation by Article 15(9) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Zato bi bilo treba Uredbo (EU) št. 43/2014 ustrezno spremeniti.
Therefore, in order to avoid excessive flexibility, which would undermine the conservation objectives set out in the Common Fisheries Policy, and to prevent negative impacts on the biological state of the stocks, Articles 3 and 4 of Regulation (EC) No 847/96 may apply to TACs only where Member States do not use the year-to-year flexibility provided for in Article 15(9) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013.
Če se celotni dovoljeni ulov za določen stalež dodeli le eni državi članici, je ustrezno to državo članico v skladu s členom 2(1) Pogodbe pooblastiti za določitev stopnje tega celotnega dovoljenega ulova.
It is appropriate to enable such flexibility in the fixing of those fishing opportunities in order the ensure a level-playing field for Union vessels by allowing the Member States concerned to opt for the use of a flexibility quota.
Določiti je treba zgornje meje ribolovnega napora za leto 2015 v skladu s členom 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 2166/2005, členom 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 509/2007, členom 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 676/2007, členoma 11 in 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 1342/2008 ter členoma 5 in 9 Uredbe (EU) št. 302/2009, pri tem pa je treba upoštevati Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 754/2009 [12].
Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly.
V skladu z najnovejšim znanstvenim mnenjem Mednarodnega sveta za raziskovanje morja (ICES) ter mednarodnimi obveznostmi v okviru Konvencije za ribištvo severovzhodnega Atlantika (NEAFC) je treba omejiti ribolovni napor za določene globokomorske vrste.
Where a TAC relating to a stock is allocated to one Member State only, it is appropriate to empower that Member State in accordance with Article 2(1) of the Treaty to determine the level of such TAC.
Pri nekaterih vrstah, kot so nekatere vrste morskega psa, bi lahko celo omejene ribolovne dejavnosti resno ogrozile njihovo ohranitev.
Provisions should be made to ensure that, when fixing that TAC level, the Member State concerned acts in a manner fully consistent with the principles and rules of the Common Fisheries Policy.
Ribolovne možnosti za takšne vrste bi bilo zato treba popolnoma omejiti s splošno prepovedjo ribolova teh vrst.
It is necessary to establish the fishing effort ceilings for 2015 in accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 2166/2005, Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2007, Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 676/2007, Articles 11 and 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 and Articles 5 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 302/2009, while taking into account Council Regulation (EC) No 754/2009 [12].
Uporabo ribolovnih možnosti, ki so na voljo plovilom Unije in so določene v tej uredbi, ureja Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 [13], zlasti člena 33 in 34 navedene uredbe o evidentiranju ulova in ribolovnega napora ter sporočanju podatkov o izčrpanju ribolovnih možnosti.
In the light of the most recent scientific advice from International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) and in accordance with the international commitments in the context of the North East Atlantic Fisheries Convention (NEAFC), it is necessary to limit the fishing effort on certain deep-sea species.
Zato je treba določiti oznake, ki jih države članice uporabljajo pri pošiljanju podatkov Komisiji v zvezi z iztovarjanjem staležev, ki jih ureja ta uredba.
For certain species, such as certain species of sharks, even a limited fishing activity could result in a serious risk to their conservation.
Za nekatere celotne dovoljene ulove bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti, da plovilom, ki sodelujejo pri preskusih s popolnoma dokumentiranim ribolovom, odobrijo dodatne dodelitve.
At the 11th Conference of the Parties of the Convention of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, held in Quito from 3 to 9 November 2014, a number of species was added to the lists of protected species in Appendices I and II of the Convention, with effect from 8 February 2015.
Nenadzorovani zavržki rib ogrožajo dolgoročno trajnost rib kot javno dobro in s tem cilje skupne ribiške politike.
Therefore, it is appropriate to provide for the protection of those species with respect to Union vessels fishing in all waters and non-Union vessels fishing in Union waters.
Nasprotno pa sistemi lovnih kvot ribiče spodbujajo, da pri svojih ribolovnih dejavnostih optimizirajo selektivnost ulova.
The use of fishing opportunities available to Union vessels set out in this Regulation is subject to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 [13], and in particular to Articles 33 and 34 of that Regulation, concerning the recording of catches and fishing effort and the notification of data on the exhaustion of fishing opportunities.
Za spremljanje izpolnjevanja pogojev, ki veljajo za preskuse s popolnoma dokumentiranim ribolovom, d ržave članice zagotovijo podrobno in točno dokumentiranje vseh ribolovnih potovanj ter zadostne zmogljivosti in sredstva, kot so opazovalci, videonadzor in druga sredstva.
It is therefore necessary to specify the codes to be used by Member States when sending data to the Commission relating to landings of stocks subject to this Regulation.
Pri tem bi morale države članice upoštevati načeli učinkovitosti in sorazmernosti.
For certain TACs Member States should be allowed to grant additional allocations for vessels participating in trials on fully documented fisheries.
Pri uporabi sistemov videonadzora bi bilo treba izpolnjevati zahteve Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [14].
The aim of those trials is to test a catch-quota system in fisheries that are not yet under the landing obligation set out in Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013, i.e. a system where all catches should be landed and counted against quotas in order to avoid discards and the waste of otherwise usable fish resources they entail.
Za zagotovitev, da se lahko s preskusi s popolnoma dokumentiranim ribolovom učinkovito oceni potencial sistemov lovnih kvot za nadzor nad absolutno ribolovno umrljivostjo zadevnih staležev, je nujno, da se vse ribe, ki se v navedenih preskusih ulovijo, vključno z ribami pod najmanjšo velikostjo za iztovarjanje, upoštevajo pri celotni dodelitvi za sodelujoče plovilo ter da se ribolovne dejavnosti prekinejo, kadar navedeno plovilo v celoti porabi navedeno celotno dodelitev.
Uncontrolled discards of fish are a threat to the long term sustainability of fish as a public good and thus to the Common Fisheries Policy objectives.
Ustrezno je tudi dovoliti prenose dodelitev med plovili, ki sodelujejo pri preskusih s popolnoma dokumentiranim ribolovom, in plovili, ki pri teh preskusih ne sodelujejo, vendar le, če se lahko dokaže, da se zavržki plovil, ki ne sodelujejo, ne povečajo.
By contrast, catch-quota systems inherently present the fishers with an incentive to optimise the catch selectivity of their operations.
Ob upoštevanju mnenja ICES je primerno ohraniti posebni sistem za upravljanje prave peščenke v vodah Unije razdelkov ICES IIa in IIIa ter podobmočja ICES IV.
For the purpose of monitoring compliance with the conditions to which the fully documented fisheries trials are subject, Member States should ensure detailed and accurate documentation of all fishing trips and adequate capacity and means, such as observers, closed-circuit television (CCTV) and others.
Ker naj bi bilo znanstveno mnenje ICES znano šele februarja 2015, je do izdaje tega mnenja primerno celotni dovoljeni ulov in kvote začasno določiti na vrednost nič.