natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The security, continuity and reliability of the type of digital services referred to in this Directive are of the essence for the smooth functioning of many businesses.
Varnost, neprekinjenost in zanesljivost vrste digitalnih storitev iz te direktive so ključne za nemoteno delovanje številnih podjetij.
A disruption of such a digital service could prevent the provision of other services which rely on it and could thus have an impact on key economic and societal activities in the Union.
Prekinitev take digitalne storitve bi lahko preprečila zagotavljanje drugih storitev, ki so od nje odvisne, in bi tako lahko vplivala na ključne ekonomske in družbene dejavnosti v Uniji.
Such digital services might therefore be of crucial importance for the smooth functioning of businesses that depend on them and, moreover, for the participation of such businesses in the internal market and cross-border trade across the Union.
Take digitalne storitve bi tako lahko bile ključnega pomena za nemoteno delovanje podjetij, ki so od njih odvisna, ter zlasti za udeležbo teh podjetij na notranjem trgu in čezmejno trgovino v Uniji.
Those digital service providers that are subject to this Directive are those that are considered to offer digital services on which many businesses in the Union increasingly rely.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za tiste ponudnike digitalnih storitev, za katere se šteje, da ponujajo digitalne storitve, od katerih so številna podjetja v Uniji vse bolj odvisna.
Digital service providers should ensure a level of security commensurate with the degree of risk posed to the security of the digital services they provide, given the importance of their services to the operations of other businesses within the Union.
Ponudniki digitalnih storitev bi morali zagotavljati raven varnosti, ki ustreza stopnji tveganja za varnost digitalnih storitev, ki jih zagotavljajo, in pomenu njihovih storitev za dejavnosti drugih podjetij v Uniji.
In practice, the degree of risk for operators of essential services, which are often essential for the maintenance of critical societal and economic activities, is higher than for digital service providers.
Stopnja tveganja za izvajalce bistvenih storitev, ki so pogosto bistvene za ohranjanje ključnih družbenih in gospodarskih dejavnosti, je v praksi višja od stopnje tveganja za ponudnike digitalnih storitev.
Therefore, the security requirements for digital service providers should be lighter.
Zato bi morale biti varnostne zahteve za ponudnike digitalnih storitev manj stroge.
Digital service providers should remain free to take measures they consider appropriate to manage the risks posed to the security of their network and information systems.
Ponudnikom digitalnih storitev bi morali omogočiti, da se sami odločijo za sprejetje ukrepov, ki se jim zdijo primerni za obvladovanje tveganj, ki ogrožajo varnost njihovih omrežij in informacijskih sistemov.
Because of their cross-border nature, digital service providers should be subject to a more harmonised approach at Union level.
Zaradi čezmejne narave ponudnikov digitalnih storitev, bi se moral zanje uporabljati bolj usklajen pristop na ravni Unije.
Implementing acts should facilitate the specification and implementation of such measures.
Z izvedbenimi akti bi morali zagotoviti lažjo določitev in izvajanje tovrstnih ukrepov.
While hardware manufacturers and software developers are not operators of essential services, nor are they digital service providers, their products enhance the security of network and information systems.
Čeprav proizvajalci strojne in razvijalci programske opreme niso izvajalci bistvenih storitev ali ponudniki digitalnih storitev, njihovi izdelki krepijo varnost omrežij in informacijskih sistemov.
Therefore, they play an important role in enabling operators of essential services and digital service providers to secure their network and information systems.
Izvajalcem bistvenih storitev in ponudnikom digitalnih storitev zato pomembno pomagajo pri varstvu njihovih omrežij in informacijskih sistemov.
Such hardware and software products are already subject to existing rules on product liability.
Za to strojno in programsko opremo se že uporabljajo obstoječi predpisi o odgovornosti za izdelek.
Technical and organisational measures imposed on operators of essential services and digital service providers should not require a particular commercial information and communications technology product to be designed, developed or manufactured in a particular manner.
S tehničnimi in organizacijskimi ukrepi, naloženimi izvajalcem bistvenih storitev in ponudnikom digitalnih storitev, ne bi smeli predpisovati, da se določen komercialni izdelek informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije oblikuje, razvije ali proizvede na določen način.
Operators of essential services and digital service providers should ensure the security of the network and information systems which they use.
Izvajalci bistvenih storitev in ponudniki digitalnih storitev bi morali zagotavljati varnost omrežij in informacijskih sistemov, ki jih uporabljajo.
These are primarily private network and information systems managed by their internal IT staff or the security of which has been outsourced.
To so predvsem zasebna omrežja in informacijski sistemi, ki jih upravlja njihovo notranje osebje za IT ali pa za njihovo varnost skrbi zunanji izvajalec.
The security and notification requirements should apply to the relevant operators of essential services and digital service providers regardless of whether they perform the maintenance of their network and information systems internally or outsource it.
Zahteve glede varnosti in priglasitve bi morali za zadevne izvajalce bistvenih storitev in ponudnike digitalnih storitev veljati ne glede na to, ali omrežja in informacijske sisteme vzdržujejo sami ali njihov zunanji izvajalec.
To avoid imposing a disproportionate financial and administrative burden on operators of essential services and digital service providers, the requirements should be proportionate to the risk presented by the network and information system concerned, taking into account the state of the art of such measures.
Da ne bi bili izvajalci bistvenih storitev in ponudniki digitalnih storitev nesorazmerno finančno in upravno obremenjeni, bi morale biti zahteve sorazmerne s tveganjem, ki ga pomenita zadevno omrežje in informacijski sistem, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati dovršenost takih ukrepov.
In the case of digital service providers, those requirements should not apply to micro- and small enterprises.
V primeru ponudnikov digitalnih storitev se te zahteve ne bi smele uporabljati za mikro- in mala podjetja.
Where public administrations in Member States use services offered by digital service providers, in particular cloud computing services, they might wish to require from the providers of such services additional security measures beyond what digital service providers would normally offer in compliance with the requirements of this Directive.
Kadar javne uprave držav članic uporabljajo storitve ponudnikov digitalnih storitev, zlasti storitve računalništva v oblaku, bi morda hotele od ponudnikov teh storitev zahtevati, naj poleg ukrepov, ki jih ponudniki digitalnih storitev običajno zagotavljajo v skladu s to direktivo, sprejmejo dodatne varnostne ukrepe.
They should be able to do so by means of contractual obligations.
Zato bi jim bilo treba omogočiti, da to storijo s pogodbenimi obveznostmi.
The definitions of online marketplaces, online search engines and cloud computing services in this Directive are for the specific purpose of this Directive, and without prejudice to any other instruments.
Opredelitve pojmov spletna tržnica, spletni iskalnik in storitve računalništva v oblaku so v tej direktivi določene za poseben namen te direktive in ne posegajo v druge instrumente.
This Directive should not preclude Member States from adopting national measures requiring public-sector bodies to ensure specific security requirements when they contract cloud computing services.
Ta direktiva državam članicam ne bi smela preprečevati sprejetja nacionalnih ukrepov, na podlagi katerih morajo organi javnega sektorja zagotoviti specifične varnostne zahteve v okviru pogodb za storitve računalništva v oblaku.
Any such national measures should apply to the public-sector body concerned and not to the cloud computing service provider.
Vsi ti nacionalni ukrepi bi se morali uporabljati za zadevni organ javnega sektorja in ne za ponudnika storitev računalništva v oblaku.
Given the fundamental differences between operators of essential services, in particular their direct link with physical infrastructure, and digital service providers, in particular their cross-border nature, this Directive should take a differentiated approach with respect to the level of harmonisation in relation to those two groups of entities.
Zaradi temeljnih razlik med izvajalci bistvenih storitev, zlasti njihove neposredne povezanosti s fizično infrastrukturo, in ponudniki digitalnih storitev, zlasti njihove čezmejne narave, bi morali v tej direktivi sprejeti ločen pristop do stopnje harmonizacije za obe skupini subjektov.
For operators of essential services, Member States should be able to identify the relevant operators and impose stricter requirements than those laid down in this Directive.
Kar zadeva izvajalce bistvenih storitev, bi morali državam članicam omogočiti, da določijo zadevne izvajalce in naložijo strožje zahteve od tistih v tej direktivi.
Member States should not identify digital service providers, as this Directive should apply to all digital service providers within its scope.
Države članice ne bi smele določiti ponudnikov digitalnih storitev, saj bi se morala ta direktiva uporabljati za vse ponudnike digitalnih storitev, ki sodijo v njeno področje uporabe.
In addition, this Directive and the implementing acts adopted under it should ensure a high level of harmonisation for digital service providers with respect to security and notification requirements.
Kar zadeva varnostne zahteve in zahteve glede priglasitve, bi morali ta direktiva in izvedbeni akti, sprejeti na njeni podlagi, zagotoviti tudi visoko stopnjo harmonizacije za ponudnike digitalnih storitev.
This should enable digital service providers to be treated in a uniform way across the Union, in a manner proportionate to their nature and the degree of risk which they might face.
To bi moralo omogočiti enotno obravnavo ponudnikov digitalnih storitev v Uniji, sorazmerno z njihovo naravo in stopnjo tveganja, ki bi mu lahko bili izpostavljeni.
This Directive should not preclude Member States from imposing security and notification requirements on entities that are not digital service providers within the scope of this Directive, without prejudice to Member States' obligations under Union law.
Brez poseganja v obveznosti, ki jih imajo države članice na podlagi prava Unije, ta direktiva državam članicam ne bi smela preprečiti, da varnostne zahteve in zahteve glede priglasitve uvedejo za subjekte, ki niso ponudniki digitalnih storitev s področja uporabe te direktive.
Competent authorities should pay due attention to preserving informal and trusted channels of information-sharing.
Pristojni organi bi morali ustrezno pozornost nameniti ohranjanju neformalnih in zanesljivih poti za izmenjavo informacij.
Publicity of incidents reported to the competent authorities should duly balance the interest of the public in being informed about threats against possible reputational and commercial damage for the operators of essential services and digital service providers reporting incidents.
Pri obveščanju javnosti o incidentih, priglašenih pristojnim organom, bi bilo treba najti ravnotežje med interesom javnosti, da je obveščena o nevarnostih, na eni strani, ter morebitno škodo za ugled in poslovanje izvajalcev bistvenih storitev in ponudnikov digitalnih storitev, ki priglasijo incidente, na drugi strani.
In the implementation of the notification obligations, competent authorities and the CSIRTs should pay particular attention to the need to keep information about product vulnerabilities strictly confidential, prior to the release of appropriate security fixes.
Pri izvajanju obveznosti priglasitve bi morali pristojni organi in skupine CSIRT posebno pozorno paziti, da informacije o ranljivosti izdelka ostanejo strogo zaupne, dokler se varnost znova ne vzpostavi.
Digital service providers should be subject to light-touch and reactive ex post supervisory activities justified by the nature of their services and operations.
Pri ponudnikih digitalnih storitev bi se morale ob upoštevanju narave njihovih storitev in postopkov izvajati blage ter odzivne naknadne nadzorne dejavnosti.
The competent authority concerned should therefore only take action when provided with evidence, for example by the digital service provider itself, by another competent authority, including a competent authority of another Member State, or by a user of the service, that a digital service provider is not complying with the requirements of this Directive, in particular following the occurrence of an incident.
Zadevni pristojni organ bi moral zato ukrepati – zlasti takrat, ko se je incident že zgodil – le na podlagi predloženih dokazov, ki mu jih na primer predloži sam ponudnik digitalne storitve, drug pristojni organ, vključno s pristojnim organom druge države članice, ali uporabnik storitve, da ponudnik digitalne storitve ne ravna v skladu z zahtevami iz te direktive.
The competent authority should therefore have no general obligation to supervise digital service providers.
Pristojni organ torej ne bi smel biti splošno obvezan, da nadzoruje ponudnike digitalnih storitev.
Competent authorities should have the necessary means to perform their duties, including powers to obtain sufficient information in order to assess the level of security of network and information systems.
Pristojni organi bi morali imeti potrebna sredstva za opravljanje svojih nalog, vključno s pooblastili za pridobivanje zadostnih informacij za oceno ravni varnosti omrežij in informacijskih sistemov.
Incidents may be the result of criminal activities the prevention, investigation and prosecution of which is supported by coordination and cooperation between operators of essential services, digital service providers, competent authorities and law enforcement authorities.
Incidenti so lahko posledica kriminalnih dejavnosti, ki se preprečujejo, preiskujejo in preganjajo z usklajevanjem in sodelovanjem med izvajalci bistvenih storitev, ponudniki digitalnih storitev, pristojnimi organi in organi kazenskega pregona.
Where it is suspected that an incident is related to serious criminal activities under Union or national law, Member States should encourage operators of essential services and digital service providers to report incidents of a suspected serious criminal nature to the relevant law enforcement authorities.
V primeru suma, da je incident povezan s hudimi kaznivimi dejanji po pravu Unije ali nacionalnem pravu, bi morale države članice izvajalce bistvenih storitev in ponudnike digitalnih storitev spodbujati, da incident, za katerega sumijo, da je hudo kaznivo dejanje, prijavijo ustreznim organom kazenskega pregona.
Where appropriate, it is desirable that coordination between competent authorities and law enforcement authorities of different Member States be facilitated by the European Cybercrime Centre (EC3) and ENISA.
Kjer je to ustrezno, je priporočljivo, da Evropski center za boj proti kibernetski kriminaliteti (EC3) in ENISA zagotavljata lažje usklajevanje med pristojnimi organi in organi kazenskega pregona različnih držav članic.
Personal data are in many cases compromised as a result of incidents.
V številnih primerih je zaradi incidentov ogrožena varnost osebnih podatkov.
In this context, competent authorities and data protection authorities should cooperate and exchange information on all relevant matters to tackle any personal data breaches resulting from incidents.
Zato bi morali pristojni organi in organi za varstvo podatkov pri odpravljanju kršitev varnosti osebnih podatkov, nastalih zaradi incidentov, med seboj sodelovati in si izmenjevati pomembne informacije.
Jurisdiction in respect of digital service providers should be attributed to the Member State in which the digital service provider concerned has its main establishment in the Union, which in principle corresponds to the place where the provider has its head office in the Union.
Pristojnost glede ponudnikov digitalnih storitev bi morali podeliti državi članici, v kateri ima ponudnik digitalnih storitev glavni sedež v Uniji, ki je načeloma tista država članica, kjer je glavna uprava ponudnika v Uniji.
Establishment implies the effective and real exercise of activity through stable arrangements.
Sedež pomeni, da se dejavnost izvaja dejansko in učinkovito na podlagi stabilnih ureditev.
The legal form of such arrangements, whether through a branch or a subsidiary with a legal personality, is not the determining factor in this respect.
Pravna oblika takih ureditev, bodisi prek podružnice ali odvisne družbe, ki je pravna oseba, v tem pogledu ni odločujoči dejavnik.
This criterion should not depend on whether the network and information systems are physically located in a given place; the presence and use of such systems do not, in themselves, constitute such main establishment and are therefore not criteria for determining the main establishment.
To merilo ne bi smelo biti odvisno od tega, ali so omrežja in informacijski sistemi fizično locirani na tistem mestu; prisotnost in uporaba teh sistemov sami po sebi ne pomenita tega glavnega sedeža in zato nista merili za ugotavljanje glavnega sedeža.
Where a digital service provider not established in the Union offers services within the Union, it should designate a representative.
Ponudnik digitalnih storitev brez sedeža v Uniji, ki nudi storitve v Uniji, bi moral določiti predstavnika.
In order to determine whether such a digital service provider is offering services within the Union, it should be ascertained whether it is apparent that the digital service provider is planning to offer services to persons in one or more Member States.
Da bi ugotovili, ali tak ponudnik digitalnih storitev le-te nudi v Uniji, bi bilo treba preveriti, ali je jasno, da namerava ponudnik digitalnih storitev svoje storitve nuditi posameznikom v eni ali več državah članicah.
The mere accessibility in the Union of the digital service provider's or an intermediary's website or of an email address and of other contact details, or the use of a language generally used in the third country where the digital service provider is established, is insufficient to ascertain such an intention.
Sama dostopnost spletnega mesta ponudnika digitalnih storitev ali spletnega mesta posrednika v Uniji ali elektronskega naslova in drugih kontaktnih podatkov ali uporaba jezika, ki se običajno uporablja v tretji državi, v kateri ima ponudnik digitalnih storitev sedež, ne zadošča za določitev takšne namere.
However, factors such as the use of a language or a currency generally used in one or more Member States with the possibility of ordering services in that other language, or the mentioning of customers or users who are in the Union, may make it apparent that the digital service provider is planning to offer services within the Union.
Vendar se lahko z dejavniki, kot je uporaba jezika ali valute, ki se običajno uporablja v eni ali več državah članicah, z možnostjo naročanja storitev v tem drugem jeziku, ali navedba strank ali uporabnikov, ki so v Uniji, jasno pokaže, da namerava ponudnik digitalnih storitev nuditi storitve v Uniji.
The representative should act on behalf of the digital service provider and it should be possible for competent authorities or the CSIRTs to contact the representative.
Predstavnik bi moral delovati v imenu ponudnika digitalnih storitev, pristojni organi ali skupine CSIRT pa bi morali imeti možnost, da navežejo stik s predstavnikom.
The representative should be explicitly designated by a written mandate of the digital service provider to act on the latter's behalf with regard to the latter's obligations under this Directive, including incident reporting.
Ponudnik digitalnih storitev bi moral predstavnika pisno izrecno določiti, da v njegovem imenu izvaja njegove obveznosti na podlagi te direktive, vključno s priglasitvijo incidentov.
Standardisation of security requirements is a market-driven process.
Standardizacija varnostnih zahtev je proces, ki ga narekuje trg.
To ensure a convergent application of security standards, Member States should encourage compliance or conformity with specified standards so as to ensure a high level of security of network and information systems at Union level.
Za zagotovitev usklajene uporabe varnostnih standardov bi morale države članice spodbujati uporabo ali upoštevanje določenih standardov ter tako zagotoviti visoko raven varnosti omrežij in informacijskih sistemov na ravni Unije.
ENISA should assist Member States through advice and guidelines.
ENISA bi morala državam članicam pomagati s svetovanjem in smernicami.
To this end, it might be helpful to draft harmonised standards, which should be done in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [8].
V ta namen bi bilo morda v pomoč, če bi oblikovali harmonizirane standarde, kar bi morali storiti v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1025/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8].
Entities falling outside the scope of this Directive may experience incidents having a significant impact on the services they provide.
Subjektom, ki ne sodijo na področje uporabe te direktive, se lahko zgodijo incidenti, ki pomembno vplivajo na storitve, ki jih ponujajo.
Where those entities consider that it is in the public interest to notify the occurrence of such incidents, they should be able to do so on a voluntary basis.
Kadar ti subjekti menijo, da je priglasitev pojava takšnih incidentov v javnem interesu, bi jim bilo treba omogočiti, da to storijo prostovoljno.
Such notifications should be processed by the competent authority or the CSIRT where such processing does not constitute a disproportionate or undue burden on the Member States concerned.
Te priglasitve bi morali obdelati ustrezni organi držav članic ali skupine CSIRT, kadar takšna obdelava za zadevne države članice ne pomeni nesorazmernega ali neupravičenega bremena.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to lay down the procedural arrangements necessary for the functioning of the Cooperation Group and the security and notification requirements applicable to digital service providers.
Za zagotovitev enotnih pogojev za izvajanje te direktive bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila za določitev postopkovnih ureditev, potrebnih za delovanje skupine za sodelovanje, ter zahtev glede varnosti in priglasitve, ki se uporabljajo za ponudnike digitalnih storitev.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9].
Navedena pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9].
When adopting implementing acts related to the procedural arrangements necessary for the functioning of the Cooperation Group, the Commission should take the utmost account of the opinion of ENISA.
Komisija bi morala pri sprejemanju izvedbenih aktov o postopkovnih ureditvah, potrebnih za delovanje skupine za sodelovanje, v največji možni meri upoštevati mnenje ENISA.
When adopting implementing acts on the security requirements for digital service providers, the Commission should take the utmost account of the opinion of ENISA and should consult interested stakeholders.
Komisija bi morala pri sprejemanju izvedbenih aktov o varnostnih zahtevah za ponudnike digitalnih storitev v največji možni meri upoštevati mnenje ENISA in se posvetovati z zainteresiranimi deležniki.