natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
amending for the 236th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaeda network
o dvestošestintrideseti spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 881/2002 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte, povezane z mrežo Al-Kaida
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaeda network [1], and in particular Article 7(1)(a) and Article 7a(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 881/2002 z dne 27. maja 2002 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte, povezane z mrežo Al-Kaida [1], ter zlasti člena 7(1)(a) in člena 7a(1) Uredbe,
On 3 September 2015 the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) approved the addition of one person to the Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee's list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.
Odbor za sankcije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov je 3. septembra 2015 odobril vključitev ene osebe na seznam odbora Združenih narodov za sankcije proti Al Kaidi, na katerem so osebe, skupine in subjekti, za katere velja zamrznitev sredstev in gospodarskih virov.
Done at Brussels, 11 September 2015.
V Bruslju, 11. septembra 2015
ANNEX
V naslovu „Fizične osebe“ Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 881/2002 se doda naslednji vnos:
The following entry shall be added to Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 under the heading ‘Natural persons’:
„Sofiane Ben Goumo, (tudi (a) Sufyan bin Qumu (b), Abou Fares al Libi).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1518
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1518
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of biodiesel originating in the United States of America following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(2) Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 599/2009 [2], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty ranging from EUR 0 to EUR 198,0 per tonne on imports of fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoil obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, commonly known as ‘biodiesel’, in pure form or in a blend containing by weight more than 20 % of fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoil obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, at that time falling within CN codes ex15162098 (TARIC code 1516209820), ex15180091 (TARIC code 1518009120), ex15180099 (TARIC code 1518009920), ex27101941 (TARIC code 2710194120), 38249091, ex38249097 (TARIC code 3824909787), and originating in the United States of America (‘USA’ or ‘the country concerned’).
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 599/2009 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini od 0 EUR do 198 EUR na tono na uvoz monoalkilnih estrov maščobnih kislin in/ali parafinskega plinskega olja, pridobljenih s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem, nefosilnega izvora, splošno znanih kot „biodizel“, v čisti obliki ali mešanici, ki vsebuje več kot 20 mas. % monoalkilnih estrov maščobnih kislin in/ali parafinskega plinskega olja, pridobljenih s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem, nefosilnega izvora, ki so se takrat uvrščali pod oznake KN ex15162098 (oznaka TARIC 1516209820), ex15180091 (oznaka TARIC 1518009120), ex15180099 (oznaka TARIC 1518009920), ex27101941 (oznaka TARIC 2710194120), 38249091, ex38249097 (oznaka TARIC 3824909787), s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike („ZDA“ ali „zadevna država“).
The anti-dumping duty imposed by that regulation is hereafter referred to as ‘the existing measures’.
Za protidampinško dajatev, uvedeno z navedeno uredbo, se v nadaljnjem besedilu uporablja izraz „obstoječi ukrepi“.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 444/2011 [3], following an anti-circumvention investigation, the Council extended the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 599/2009 to imports into the Union of biodiesel consigned from Canada, whether declared as originating in Canada or not, with the exception of those produced by the companies BIOX Corporation, Oakville and Rothsay Biodiesel, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 444/2011 [3] je Svet po preiskavi proti izogibanju razširil dokončno protidampinško dajatev, uvedeno z Uredbo (ES) št. 599/2009, na uvoz biodizla, poslanega iz Kanade, v Unijo ne glede na to, ali je deklariran s poreklom iz Kanade ali ne, razen za izdelke, ki jih proizvajata družbi BIOX Corporation, Oakville in Rothsay Biodiesel, Guelph, Ontario, Kanada.
By the same Regulation the Council also extended the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 599/2009 to imports of biodiesel in a blend containing by weight 20 % or less of fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoil obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, originating in the United States of America.
Z isto uredbo je Svet tudi razširil dokončno protidampinško dajatev, ki je bila uvedena z Uredbo (ES) št. 599/2009, na uvoz biodizla v mešanici z vsebnostjo 20 mas. % ali manj monoalkilnih estrov maščobnih kislin in/ali parafinskega plinskega olja, pridobljenih s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem, nefosilnega izvora, s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike.
Outside the scope of this proceeding, anti-dumping measures on biodiesel are currently in force on imports from Argentina and Indonesia [4].
Zunaj področja uporabe tega postopka protidampinški ukrepi za biodizel trenutno veljajo za uvoz iz Argentine in Indonezije [4].
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [5] of the anti-dumping measures in force on the imports of biodiesel originating in the USA, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) received a request for review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [5] veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz ZDA je Evropska komisija („Komisija“) prejela zahtevek za pregled v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged on 9 April 2014 by the European Biodiesel Board (‘the applicant’ or ‘EBB’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of biodiesel.
Zahtevek je 9. aprila 2014 vložil Evropski odbor za biodizel („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje biodizla v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in recurrence of dumping and recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je temeljil na izhodišču, da bi iztek veljavnosti ukrepov verjetno povzročil ponovitev dampinga in škode industriji Unije.
Having determined, after consulting the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation, that sufficient evidence exists to justify the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 10 July 2014, by a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union [6] (‘the Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review under Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetovanju z odborom, ustanovljenim v skladu s členom 15(1) osnovne uredbe, ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za utemeljitev začetka pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, in je 10. julija 2014 z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije („obvestilo o začetku“) [6], objavila začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
On the same day, the Commission initiated an expiry review of the countervailing measures in force on the imports of biodiesel originating in the USA.
Istega dne je Komisija začela pregled zaradi izteka izravnalnih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz ZDA.
This is a parallel but distinct proceeding which is dealt with by means of a separate Regulation.
To je vzporeden, a ločen postopek, ki ga obravnava ločena uredba.
The investigation of likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode je zajemala obdobje od 1. julija 2013 do 30. junija 2014 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2011 to the end of the review investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Proučila so se gibanja, pomembna za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, v obdobju od 1. januarja 2011 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission invited interested parties to contact it in order to participate in the investigation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj se ji javijo, če želijo sodelovati v preiskavi.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the applicant, other known Union producers, the known exporting producers in the USA and the USA authorities, the known importers, suppliers and users, traders, as well as associations known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate.
Poleg tega je o začetku preiskave posebej obvestila vložnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, znane proizvajalce izvoznike v ZDA in organe ZDA, znane uvoznike, dobavitelje in uporabnike, trgovce ter združenja, za katera je znano, da jih to zadeva, in jih povabila k sodelovanju.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da je začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
The Commission selected the sample on the basis of the highest representative production and sales volumes whilst ensuring a geographical spread.
Komisija je vzorec izbrala na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega proizvodnje in prodaje, pri čemer je zagotovila geografsko porazdelitev.
This provisional sample consisted of seven Union producers located in seven different Member States which accounted for almost 30 % of Union production of biodiesel.
Ta začasni vzorec je sestavljalo sedem proizvajalcev Unije iz sedmih različnih držav članic, ki so predstavljali skoraj 30 % proizvodnje biodizla v Uniji.
One company located in Italy requested to be included in the sample.
Ena družba iz Italije je zahtevala, da se jo vključi v vzorec.
However, this company only started its activities by the end of 2013 after having acquired a biodiesel plant from another Italian biodiesel producer, which was included in the provisional sample.
Vendar je navedena družba svoje dejavnosti začela izvajati šele ob koncu leta 2013, ko je kupila obrat za proizvodnjo biodizla od drugega italijanskega proizvajalca biodizla, ki je bil vključen v začasni vzorec.
In the absence of historical data necessary for assessing relevant trends during the period considered and the fact that another Italian company was already included in the provisional sample it was decided not to include this company in the sample.
Ker ni bilo preteklih podatkov, potrebnih za ocenjevanje zadevnih gibanj v obravnavanem obdobju, in ker je bila v začasni vzorec že vključena druga italijanska družba, je bila sprejeta odločitev, da se ta družba ne vključi v vzorec.
The US National Biodiesel Board (‘NBB’) commented that the provisionally selected sample was different from the sample selected in the previous investigations concerning biodiesel and referred to two companies with sizeable production and sales volumes which were now not included.
Nacionalni odbor za biodizel ZDA (NBB – National Biodiesel Board) je predložil pripombo, da se začasno izbrani vzorec razlikuje od izbranega vzorca iz prejšnjih preiskav v zvezi z biodizlom, in se skliceval na dve družbi z velikim obsegom proizvodnje in prodaje, ki zdaj nista bili vključeni.
However, the two companies identified by NBB were either related to another company with higher sales volumes already included in the sample, or had lower sales volume than a provisionally selected company in the same Member State.
Vendar sta bili družbi, ki ju je navedel nacionalni odbor za biodizel, povezani z drugo družbo z večjim obsegom prodaje, ki je že bila vključena v vzorec, ali pa sta imeli manjši obseg prodaje kot začasno izbrana družba iz iste države članice.
Therefore, the inclusion of either of those two companies would not have changed the representativeness of the provisionally selected sample.
Zato vključitev katere koli izmed navedenih družb ne bi spremenila reprezentativnosti začasno izbranega vzorca.
The provisionally selected sample was therefore confirmed as a representative sample of the Union industry.
Začasno izbrani vzorec se je zato potrdil kot reprezentativni vzorec industrije Unije.
Following disclosure, the US Government claimed that a sample representing 30 % of the Union industry could not be considered representative of the Union biodiesel industry as a whole and that the microindicators should have been analysed on a broader basis.
Po razkritju je vlada ZDA trdila, da vzorca, ki predstavlja 30 % industrije Unije, ni mogoče šteti kot reprezentativnega za industrijo biodizla Unije kot celote in da bi bilo treba mikroekonomske kazalnike proučiti širše.
The US Government refers to the WTO Appelate Body finding in the case EC — Fasteners in which a sample of 27 % was considered low in proportion to the total and would only constitute a major proportion in the case of fragmented industries.
Vlada ZDA se sklicuje na ugotovitev pritožbenega organa STO v zadevi ES – pritrdilni elementi, v kateri se je vzorec v velikosti 27 % štel za majhnega glede na celoto in bi predstavljal glavni delež samo v primeru razdrobljenih industrijskih panog.
The Commission, contrary to the Fasteners investigation, defined for the purpose of this investigation, the Union industry as the entire industry and not only the sampled companies (recital (93) below).
Komisija je v nasprotju s preiskavo v zadevi pritrdilni elementi za namen te preiskave industrijo Unije opredelila kot celotno industrijo in ne samo kot vzorčene družbe (uvodna izjava 93).
Furthermore, all macroindicators were assessed on the basis of the entire industry whilst only some microindicators were analysed at the level of the sampled companies.
Poleg tega so bili vsi makroekonomski kazalniki ocenjeni na podlagi celotne industrije, na ravni vzorčenih družb pa samo nekateri mikroekonomski kazalniki.
However, the overall analysis of the situation of the Union industry was based on an assessment of both micro- and macroindicators.
Vendar je splošna analiza položaja industrije Unije temeljila na oceni mikro- in makroekonomskih kazalnikov.
In any event, the Union industry is considered to be a fragmented industry since it is composed of over 200 producers located across the Union of which most are small and medium enterprises.
V vsakem primeru se industrija Unije šteje za razdrobljeno, saj jo sestavlja več kot 200 proizvajalcev po vsej Uniji, ki so večinoma mala in srednja podjetja.
Therefore, the Commission concludes that the sample, representing 30 % of the Union industry, is representative and the claim is accordingly rejected.
Zato je Komisija sklenila, da je vzorec, ki predstavlja 30 % industrije Unije, reprezentativen, zato se trditev v skladu s tem zavrne.
To decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je nepovezane uvoznike pozvala, naj zagotovijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
Only few unrelated importers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Le nekaj nepovezanih uvoznikov je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
Sampling of exporting producers in the USA
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov v ZDA
To decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all exporting producers in the USA to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je vse proizvajalce izvoznike v ZDA pozvala, naj zagotovijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
In addition, the Commission asked the mission of the USA to the European Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Poleg tega je Komisija pozvala predstavništvo ZDA v Evropski uniji, naj navede morebitne druge proizvajalce izvoznike, ki bi jih zanimalo sodelovanje v preiskavi, in/ali vzpostavi stik z njimi.
27 producers in the USA replied to the Commission but only 9 provided export and/or domestic sales data requested in Annex I to the Notice of Initiation for the purpose of sampling.
Komisiji je odgovorilo 27 proizvajalcev v ZDA, vendar jih je samo devet predložilo zahtevane podatke o izvozu in/ali domači prodaji iz Priloge I k obvestilu o začetku za namen vzorčenja.
None of them was exporting to the Union during the RIP.
Nobeden od njih v OPP ni izvažal v Unijo.
The Commission selected a sample of three exporting producers with the highest volume of domestic and export sales.
Komisija je izbrala vzorec treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov z največjim obsegom domače prodaje in izvoza.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, all known exporting producers concerned, and the authorities of the USA, were consulted on the selection of the sample.
V skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe so bila o izboru vzorca opravljena posvetovanja z vsemi znanimi proizvajalci izvozniki in organi ZDA.
None of the sampled producers provided any questionnaire reply within the deadline.
Noben vzorčeni proizvajalec ni predložil izpolnjenega vprašalnika do roka.
On 7 October 2014 the Commission informed the three sampled exporting producers about this lack of reply.
Komisija je 7. oktobra 2014 obvestila tri vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike, da ni prejela odgovorov.
On 10 October 2014, one sampled exporting producer informed the Commission that it had chosen not to respond to the questionnaire.
Dne 10. oktobra 2014 je en vzorčeni proizvajalec izvoznik obvestil Komisijo o svoji odločitvi, da vprašalnika ne bo izpolnil.
The other two sampled exporting producers requested various extensions to the deadline, which were granted, but no full replies were submitted.
Preostala dva vzorčena proizvajalca izvoznika sta zaprosila za več podaljšanj roka, ki so bila odobrena, vendar kljub temu nista predložila popolnih odgovorov.
On 10 November 2014 the Commission sent a letter informing the three sampled companies about the intention to apply Article 18 of the basic Regulation and base the findings of the investigation on facts available.
Komisija je 10. novembra 2014 poslala dopis, s katerim je tri vzorčene družbe obvestila, da namerava uporabiti člen 18 osnovne uredbe in da bodo ugotovitve preiskave temeljile na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
The USA authorities were also informed about this intention.
O tej nameri je obvestila tudi organe ZDA.
The deadline for providing comments to the letter was 21 November 2014.
Rok za predložitev pripomb na dopis je bil 21. november 2014.
By 21 November 2014, two of the sampled companies did not react at all and the other sampled company explained that the time limit was not sufficient for them to submit their answer.
Do 21. novembra 2014 se dve od vzorčenih družb nista odzvali, tretja vzorčena družba pa je pojasnila, da odgovora ne more predložiti v tako kratkem roku.
The Commission therefore concluded that none of the sampled exporting producers in the USA cooperated in the expiry review investigation.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da v preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa ni sodeloval noben proizvajalec izvoznik v ZDA.
As a consequence, the Commission decided to apply the provisions of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and, accordingly, that findings, affirmative or negative, may be made on the basis of the facts available.
Zato se je Komisija odločila, da bo uporabila določbe iz člena 18 osnovne uredbe in da se zato lahko na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev sprejmejo pozitivne ali negativne ugotovitve.
The company Cargill Inc. noted that Regulation (EC) No 599/2009 had established a de minimis dumping margin and thus had imposed a 0 % definitive anti-dumping duty rate on US origin biodiesel produced and exported by them.
Družba Cargill Inc. je navedla, da je bila z Uredbo (ES) št. 599/2009 določena stopnja dampinga de minimis in s tem uvedena 0-odstotna stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve na biodizel s poreklom iz ZDA, ki ga ZDA proizvajajo in izvažajo.
They further noted that in line with the WTO Appellate Body findings in the report ‘Mexico Rice’ [7] an exporting producer not found to be dumping in an original investigation cannot be made subject to the expiry review of the anti-dumping measures.
Poleg tega je navedla, da v skladu z ugotovitvami pritožbenega organa STO v poročilu „Mexico Rice“ [7] proizvajalec izvoznik, za katerega v prvotni preiskavi ni bilo ugotovljeno, da izvaja damping, ne more biti predmet pregleda zaradi izteka protidampinških ukrepov.
The company Cargill Inc. therefore requested to continue to be exempted from anti-dumping duties irrespective of the outcome of the expiry review.
Družba Cargill Inc. je zato zaprosila, naj bo tudi v prihodnosti izvzeta iz protidampinških dajatev ne glede na rezultat pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the sampled Union producers and to the unrelated importers, traders and users that had made themselves known within the time limits set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije in nepovezanim uvoznikom, trgovcem in uporabnikom, ki so se javili v rokih iz obvestila o začetku.
Bio-Oils Huelva S.L., Huelva, Spain,
Bio-Oils Huelva S.L., Huelva, Španija,
Diester industrie SAS, Rouen, France,
Diester industrie SAS, Rouen, Francija,
Novaol S.R.L., Milan, Italy,
Novaol S.R.L., Milan, Italija,
Preol a.s., Lovosice, Czech Republic,
Preol a.s., Lovosice, Češka,
Verbio Vereinigte BioEnergie AG, Leipzig, Germany.
Verbio Vereinigte BioEnergie AG, Leipzig, Nemčija.
On 3 June 2015, the Commission disclosed to all interested parties the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to maintain the anti-dumping measures in force and invited all interested parties to comment.
Komisija je 3. junija 2015 vsem zainteresiranim stranem razkrila bistvena dejstva in premisleke, na podlagi katerih je nameravala ohraniti veljavne protidampinške ukrepe, ter pozvala vse zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo pripombe.
The comments made by the interested parties were considered by the Commission and taken into account, where appropriate.
Komisija je obravnavala pripombe zainteresiranih strani in jih po potrebi upoštevala.
Following final disclosure NBB requested and was granted a hearing with the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.
Po končnem razkritju je nacionalni odbor za biodizel zahteval zaslišanje pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih, ki je bilo odobreno.
PRODUCT UNDER REVIEW AND LIKE PRODUCT
IZDELEK, KI SE PREGLEDUJE, IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
Product under review
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje