natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/461
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/461
laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the process to reach a joint decision on the application to use a group internal model in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o določitvi izvedbenih tehničnih standardov za postopek sprejetja skupne odločitve glede vloge za uporabo notranjega modela skupine v skladu z Direktivo 2009/138/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Directive 2009/138/EC of 25 November 2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) [1] and in particular Article 231(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/138/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti zavarovanja in pozavarovanja (Solventnost II) [1] in zlasti člena 231(4) Direktive,
An efficient exchange of appropriate information between the national supervisory authorities concerned is essential for the provision of an effective process for the reaching of a joint decision on group internal models.
Učinkovita izmenjava ustreznih informacij med zadevnimi nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi je bistvena za zagotavljanje učinkovitega postopka za sprejetje skupne odločitve glede notranjih modelov skupine.
In order to ensure a consistent application of the process for reaching a joint decision, it is important that each step be well defined.
Za zagotovitev doslednega izvajanja postopka za sprejetje skupne odločitve je pomembno, da je vsak korak dobro opredeljen.
A clear process also facilitates exchange of information, promotes mutual understanding, develops relationships between the supervisory authorities concerned and promotes effective supervision.
Jasen postopek lahko olajša izmenjavo informacij, spodbuja vzajemno razumevanje, razvije odnose med zadevnimi nadzornimi organi in spodbuja učinkovit nadzor.
Timely and realistic planning for the joint decision process is essential.
Pravočasno in stvarno načrtovanje postopka skupnega odločanja je ključnega pomena.
Every supervisory authority concerned should provide the group supervisor with relevant information on a timely basis.
Vsak zadevni nadzorni organ bi moral nadzorniku skupine pravočasno predložiti ustrezne informacije.
Establishing and documenting clear processes for the content and implementation of the joint decision should ensure that it is fully reasoned.
Vzpostavljanje in dokumentiranje jasnih postopkov za vsebino in izvajanje skupnega odločanja bi moralo zagotoviti, da je ta popolnoma utemeljen.
The process to reach a joint decision on the application to use a group internal model should be consistent for the joint decision on major changes and for changes to the policy for changing the model for group internal models.
Postopek za sprejetje odločitve glede vloge za uporabo notranjega modela skupine bi moral biti usklajen tako za skupno odločanje o pomembnih spremembah kot o spremembah politike glede menjave notranjih modelov skupine.
This Regulation is based on the draft implementing technical standards submitted by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) to the Commission.
Ta uredba temelji na osnutkih izvedbenih tehničnih standardov, ki jih je Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine (EIOPA) predložil Komisiji.
EIOPA has conducted open public consultations on the draft implementing technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the opinion of the Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2],
EIOPA je opravila odprta javna posvetovanja o osnutkih izvedbenih tehničnih standardov, na katerih temelji ta uredba, analizirala morebitne povezane stroške in koristi ter zaprosila za mnenje interesno skupino, ustanovljeno v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1094/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2].
In order to enhance legal certainty about the supervisory regime during the phasing-in period provided for in Article 308a of Directive 2009/138/EC, which will start on 1 April 2015, it is important to ensure that this Regulation enters into force as soon as possible, on the day after that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Za izboljšanje pravne varnosti glede nadzornega režima v obdobju postopnega uvajanja iz člena 308a Direktive 2009/138/ES, ki se začne 1. aprila 2015, je pomembno zagotoviti, da ta uredba začne veljati takoj, ko je to mogoče, in sicer dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije –
This Regulation specifies the procedures to be followed by the supervisory authorities in order to reach a joint decision, referred to in Article 231(2) of Directive 2009/138/EC, on the application for permission to use a group internal model to calculate the consolidated group Solvency Capital Requirement, as well as the Solvency Capital Requirement of insurance and reinsurance undertakings in the group.
Ta uredba določa postopke, ki jih morajo upoštevati nadzorni organi za sprejetje skupne odločitve iz člena 231(2) Direktive 2009/138/ES, v zvezi z vlogo za dovoljenje za uporabo notranjega modela skupine pri izračunu konsolidiranega zahtevanega solventnostnega kapitala skupine ter zahtevanega solventnostnega kapitala zavarovalnice in pozavarovalnice v skupini.
For the purpose of this Regulation, ‘supervisory authorities concerned’ are the supervisory authorities of all the Member States in which the head offices of each related insurance and reinsurance undertakings applying for the use of a group internal model to calculate their Solvency Capital Requirement are situated.
Za namen te uredbe so „zadevni nadzorni organi“ nadzorni organi držav članic, v katerih se nahaja sedež vsake povezane zavarovalnice in pozavarovalnice, ki vloži vlogo za uporabo notranjega modela skupine pri izračunu njihovega zahtevanega solventnostnega kapitala.
Agreement on the process
Dogovor o postopku
The supervisory authorities concerned shall agree on the process to reach and the way to formalise a joint decision including timeline, main steps and deliverables, also taking into account the requirements set out in Directive 2009/138/EC as further specified in the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 [3] supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC.
Zadevni nadzorni organi se dogovorijo o postopku za dosego skupne odločitve in načinu za njeno formalizacijo, vključno s časovnim načrtom, glavnimi koraki in rezultati, ob upoštevanju zahtev iz Direktive 2009/138/ES, kot so podrobneje določene v Delegirani uredbi Komisije (EU) 2015/35 [3] z dne 10. oktobra 2014 o dopolnitvi Direktive 2009/138/ES.
In order to do everything within their power to reach a joint decision according to Article 231(2) of Directive 2009/138/EC, every supervisory authority concerned shall ensure that the main steps and deliverables set out for the agreed process are followed in a timely way.
Da bi storil vse, kar je v njegovi moči, za dosego skupne odločitve v skladu s členom 231(2) Direktive 2009/138/ES, mora vsak zadevni nadzorni organ zagotoviti, da se pravočasno izvedejo vsi glavni koraki in dosežejo rezultati, določeni za dogovorjen postopek.
The supervisory authorities concerned shall take into account when agreeing on the process, any legal impediments or internal processes that may restrict them to give their formal view on the application within the specified timeframe.
Zadevni nadzorni organi pri dogovarjanju o postopku upoštevajo vse pravne ovire ali notranje postopke, ki jih lahko ovirajo pri podajanju uradnega mnenja o vlogi v določenem časovnem roku.
To this end, all supervisory authorities concerned shall inform the other ones about any legal impediments or internal processes that may exist in their respective supervisory authority.
V ta namen vsi zadevni nadzorni organi druge obvestijo o vseh pravnih ovirah ali notranjih postopkih, ki morda obstajajo znotraj njihove nadzorne pristojnosti.
The supervisory authorities concerned shall provide the other authorities concerned with any information that may be relevant for the decision on the application as soon as practical.
Zadevni nadzorni organi drugim zadevnim organom posredujejo vse informacije, ki so lahko pomembne za odločitev glede vloge, takoj ko je to praktično izvedljivo.
In the case a supervisory authority concerned raises a matter regarding the process, in particular when consensus on a decision is not likely to be reached, it shall explain the reasons for this to the other supervisory authorities concerned and indicate whether it intends to refer the matter to EIOPA according to Article 231(3) of Directive 2009/138/EC.
Če zadevni nadzorni organ postavi vprašanje glede postopka, zlasti kadar je soglasje glede odločitve malo verjetno, drugemu zadevnemu nadzornemu organu razloži razloge za svoje vprašanje ter navede, ali namerava zadevo predložiti EIOPA v skladu s členom 231(3) Direktive 2009/138/ES.
The group supervisor shall discuss with all supervisory authorities concerned with the aim to find a solution to the matter.
Nadzornik skupine se posvetuje z vsemi zadevnimi nadzornimi organi, da bi našel rešitev težave.
The supervisory authorities shall agree on a timeframe to reach a solution.
Nadzorni organi se dogovorijo o časovnem načrtu za rešitev.
If no satisfactory solution is reached in the agreed timeframe and the relevant supervisory authority decides to refer the matter to EIOPA, it shall do it without delay.
Če se v dogovorjenem roku ne najde zadovoljive rešitve in se zadevni nadzorni organ odloči, da zadevo predloži EIOPA, to stori nemudoma.
Proposal for a decision
Predlog za odločitev
Before making a proposal for a decision, the supervisory authorities concerned shall confirm that the assessment of the application has been finalized and that the outcome of this assessment constitutes the basis for making a decision on the application.
Pred pripravo predloga za odločitev zadevni nadzorni organi potrdijo, da je ocena vloge zaključena in se bo uporabila kot podlaga za odločanje o vlogi.
The other supervisory authorities concerned shall give their input on the proposal for a decision to the group supervisor in writing by summarising the outcome of the assessment made.
Drugi zadevni nadzorni organi pošljejo svoje mnenje o predlogu za odločitev nadzorniku skupine v pisni obliki, pri čemer povzamejo rezultat opravljene ocene.
The group supervisor, with the input of the other supervisory authorities concerned referred to in paragraph 2, shall draft a written proposal for a decision, including, if applicable, the terms and conditions the proposed decision is subject to.
Nadzornik skupine iz prispevkov drugih zadevnih nadzornih organov iz odstavka 2 pripravi pisni predlog odločitve, po potrebi vključno s pogoji, ki veljajo za predlagano odločitev.
This proposal shall include the reasons for the decision and, if applicable, for the terms and conditions.
V predlog se vključijo razlogi za odločitev in po potrebi za pogoje.
When drafting a proposal for a decision, the group supervisor shall consider, if appropriate, the views expressed during the assessment of the application by the other supervisory authorities concerned regarding the appropriateness of the group internal model for the calculation of the consolidated group Solvency Capital Requirement.
Pri pripravi predloga odločitve nadzornik skupine po potrebi upošteva mnenja, ki so jih med oceno vloge izrazili drugi zadevni nadzorni organi glede primernosti notranjega modela skupine za izračun konsolidiranega zahtevanega solventnostnega kapitala skupine.
If relevant, the group supervisor shall also take into consideration the views from the other supervisory authorities within the college of supervisors regarding the group internal model.
Po potrebi nadzornik skupine glede notranjega modela skupine upošteva tudi mnenja drugih nadzornih organov v kolegiju nadzornikov.
The group supervisor shall send the proposal for a decision to the supervisory authorities concerned and, where appropriate, to the other members and participants of the college.
Nadzornik skupine posreduje odločitev zadevnim nadzornim organom in, kadar je to primerno, drugim članom in udeležencem kolegija.
The other supervisory authorities concerned shall provide in writing to the group supervisor their opinion on the proposal for a decision, including, if applicable, their opinion on the terms and conditions to which the proposed decision is subject.
Drugi zadevni nadzorni organi predložijo nadzorniku skupine v pisni obliki svoje mnenje o predlogu za odločitev, po potrebi vključno s svojim mnenjem o pogojih, ki veljajo za predlagano odločitev.
The group supervisor shall aggregate the opinions received and provide a synthesis of them to the other supervisory authorities concerned.
Nadzornik skupine združi prejeta mnenja in njihov osnutek predloži drugim zadevnim nadzornim organom.
The group supervisor shall organise at least a session with the other supervisory authorities concerned to discuss the proposal for a decision and the opinions provided.
Nadzornik skupine organizira najmanj sejo z drugimi zadevnimi nadzornimi organi, na kateri razpravljajo o predlogu za odločitev in predloženih mnenjih.
These sessions may take place as a physical meeting or, when agreed by all the supervisory authorities concerned, through other means.
Te seje lahko potekajo v fizični obliki ali prek drugih medijev, če se s tem strinjajo vsi zadevni nadzorni organi.
The discussion shall aim at reaching consensus on a joint decision.
Namen razprave je doseči soglasje o skupni odločitvi.
Every supervisory authority concerned shall then confirm its views or send in writing its final views and reservations to the group supervisor.
Vsak zadevni nadzorni organ nato potrdi svoja stališča ali v pisni obliki pošlje svoja končna stališča in pridržke nadzorniku skupine.
Final decision
Končna odločitev
In the case set out in Article 231(5) of Directive 2009/138/EC when a joint decision has been reached, the group supervisor shall:
V primeru iz člena 231(5) Direktive 2009/138/ES nadzornik skupine, ko se doseže skupna odločitev:
document the final decision on the application and, if applicable, on the terms and conditions to which the decision is subject;
dokumentira končno odločitev o vlogi in po potrebi o pogojih, ki veljajo za odločitev;
send the final decision to all college members and, where appropriate, to participants, together with the views of the supervisory authorities concerned.
pošlje končno odločitev vsem članom kolegija in po potrebi udeležencem skupaj s stališči zadevnih nadzornih organov.
In the case referred to in the first subparagraph, the agreement on the final decision shall be confirm in writing by representatives of the supervisory authorities concerned with appropriate authority to commit their respective authorities.
V primeru iz prvega pododstavka dogovor o končni odločitvi pisno potrdijo vsi predstavniki zadevnih nadzornih organov, ki so ustrezno pooblaščeni, da zastopajo svoje organe.
In the case set out in Article 231(6) of Directive 2009/138/EC when a joint decision has not been reached, the group supervisor shall:
V primeru iz člena 231(6) Direktive 2009/138/ES nadzornik skupine, kadar se skupna odločitev ne sprejme:
document its final decision;
dokumentira svojo končno odločitev;
document the views and reservations referred to in Article 4(7);
dokumentira stališča in pridržke iz člena 4(7);
state the views and reservations from the relevant supervisory authorities concerned and, if applicable, why the group supervisor has deviated from these views when providing the supervisory authorities concerned with a document setting out its decision according to Article 231(6) of Directive 2009/138/EC;
navede stališča in pridržke zadevnih nadzornih organov ter po potrebi, zakaj se je nadzornik skupine odmaknil od teh stališč, ko je zadevnim nadzornim organom predložil dokument s svojo odločitvijo v skladu s členom 231(6) Direktive 2009/138/ES;
send the decision to the rest of college members and where appropriate to participants, together with the views and reservations of the supervisory authorities concerned.
pošlje odločitev preostalim članom kolegija in po potrebi udeležencem skupaj s stališči in pridržki zadevnih nadzornih organov.
When a final decision is made, the group supervisor shall notify the decision to the applicant without delay.
Po sprejetju končne odločitve nadzornik skupine prosilca nemudoma obvesti o odločitvi.
In case of permission to use the group internal model the group supervisor shall include in the decision:
V primeru dovoljenja za uporabo notranjega modela skupine nadzornik skupine v odločitvi navede:
if the decision was a joint decision according to Article 231(5) of Directive 2009/138/EC or made by the group supervisor according to Article 231(6) of Directive 2009/138/EC;
ali je odločitev sprejeta kot skupna odločitev v skladu s členom 231(5) Direktive 2009/138/ES ali jo je sprejel nadzornik skupine v skladu s členom 231(6) Direktive 2009/138/ES;
the names of the related undertakings included in the scope of the internal model for the calculation of the group Solvency Capital Requirement;
imena povezanih podjetij, vključenih v področje uporabe notranjega modela za izračun zahtevanega solventnostnega kapitala skupine;
the names of the related undertakings allowed to use the group internal model to calculate their Solvency Capital Requirement;
imena povezanih podjetij, ki lahko uporabljajo notranji model skupine za izračun njihovega zahtevanega solventnostnega kapitala;
if relevant, the risks and major business units within the scope of a partial internal model;
po potrebi tveganja in pomembnejše poslovne enote znotraj področja uporabe delnega notranjega modela;
the starting date from which the solvency capital requirements listed in points (c) and (d) shall be calculated using the group internal model;
začetni datum, po katerem se zahtevani solventnostni kapital iz točk (c) in (d) izračuna z uporabo notranjega modela skupine;
if relevant, the terms and conditions to which the permission to use the group internal model is subject, ant the reasons for these terms and conditions;
po potrebi pogoje, pod katerimi velja dovoljenje za uporabo notranjega modela skupine, ter razloge za te pogoje;
if relevant, a requirement for the undertaking to develop and provide a plan to extend the scope of the internal model, including the description and timeframe of the plan;
po potrebi zahtevo, da podjetja razvijejo in predložijo načrt za razširitev področja uporabe notranjega modela, vključno z opisom in časovnim okvirom načrta;
if relevant the integration technique approved to be used to integrate the partial internal model into the solvency capital requirement standard formula.
po potrebi tehnike vključevanja, odobrene za vključevanje delnega notranjega modela v standardno formulo za izračun zahtevanega solventnostnega kapitala.
In case of rejection to use the group internal model, the group supervisor shall include in the decision a brief description of the parts or aspects of the internal model that do not comply with the requirements to use a group internal model, as well as the precise reference to the requirements that are not complied with.
Če se uporaba notranjega modela zavrne, nadzornik skupine v odločitvi na kratko opiše tiste dele ali vidike notranjega modela, ki niso v skladu z zahtevami za uporabo notranjega modela skupine, ter natančno navede zahteve, ki niso izpolnjene.
The notification shall also state that the rejection does not imply that other requirements have been assessed as complied with.
V uradnem obvestilu se navede tudi, da zavrnitev ne pomeni, da je bilo za druge zahteve ocenjeno, da so izpolnjene.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 of 10 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (OJ L 12, 17.1.2015, p.
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/35 z dne 10. oktobra 2014 o dopolnitvi Direktive 2009/138/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti zavarovanja in pozavarovanja (Solventnost II) (UL L 12, 17.1.2015, str.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/462
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/462
laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the procedures for supervisory approval to establish special purpose vehicles, for the cooperation and exchange of information between supervisory authorities regarding special purpose vehicles as well as to set out formats and templates for information to be reported by special purpose vehicles in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o določitvi izvedbenih tehničnih standardov v zvezi s postopki za nadzorno odobritev za ustanovitev namenskih družb, za sodelovanje in izmenjavo informacij med nadzornimi organi glede namenskih družb ter za določitev formatov in predlog za informacije, ki jih sporočajo namenske družbe v skladu z Direktivo 2009/138/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Directive 2009/138/EC of 25 November 2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) [1], and in particular Article 211(2)(a) and (b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/138/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti zavarovanja in pozavarovanja (Solventnost II) [1] ter zlasti člena 211(2)(a) in (b) Direktive,
Special purpose vehicles require supervisory approval to be established prior to assuming risks from insurance or reinsurance undertakings.
Namenske družbe morajo pred prevzemom tveganja zavarovalnic ali pozavarovalnic pridobiti nadzorno odobritev za ustanovitev.
The conditions and procedures to be followed for granting and withdrawing this approval, including documentation requirements, are regulated by Directive 2009/138/EC and should be complemented by this Regulation.
Pogoji in postopki za dodelitev in odvzem te odobritve, vključno z zahtevami glede dokumentacije, so določeni z Direktivo 2009/138/ES ter bi jih bilo treba dopolniti s to uredbo.
Where a special purpose vehicle assumes risks from more than one insurance or reinsurance undertaking, the special purpose vehicle should maintain assets equal to or exceeding its aggregate maximum risk exposure taking into account each individual contractual obligation.
Če namenska družba prevzame tveganja več kot ene zavarovalnice ali pozavarovalnice, bi morala vzdrževati sredstva, ki so enaka ali presegajo njeno skupno največjo izpostavljenost tveganju ob upoštevanju vseh posameznih pogodbenih obveznosti.
When granting supervisory approval, the supervisory authority should assess whether this obligation is being met and consider each individual contractual arrangement and risk transfer.
Pri dodelitvi nadzorne odobritve bi moral nadzorni organ oceniti, ali je ta obveznost izpolnjena, ter preučiti vsak posamezni pogodbeni dogovor in prenos tveganja.
It is important to set procedures for the cooperation and exchange of information between supervisory authorities, where the special purpose vehicle is established in a Member State which is not the Member State where the insurance or reinsurance undertaking, from which it assumes risk, is established.
Pomembno je določiti postopke za sodelovanje in izmenjavo informacij med nadzornimi organi, če je namenska družba ustanovljena v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri je ustanovljena zavarovalnica ali pozavarovalnica, od katere prevzame tveganje.
The cooperation and exchange of information between those supervisory authorities is particularly important during the process of the supervisory approval of the special purpose vehicle.
Sodelovanje in izmenjava informacij med temi nadzornimi organi sta zlasti pomembna med postopkom za nadzorno odobritev namenske družbe.