natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Consequently, even where an objective of common interest has been recognised, such as the environmental objective of preventing carbon leakage, it is crucial that the distortive effects of any aid are kept to a minimum and that a level playing field is preserved for all market players in the internal market.
Kot je bilo že opisano v uvodni izjavi 87 in naslednjih, Komisija meni, da glede na kratko obdobje, za katero bi bila dodeljena pomoč (manj kot šest mesecev), in domnevne strukturne težave panoge ni bilo dokazano, kako bi ukrep pomoči vplival na ravnanje upravičencev.
Indeed, one of the specific objectives pursued with the adoption of the ETS Guidelines (alongside the prevention of carbon leakage and the preservation of the efficiency of the ETS) was to minimise distortions on the internal market [63].
Poleg tega mora biti državna pomoč omejena na najnižji znesek, ki je potreben za doseganje cilja skupnega interesa.
Such distortions cannot only arise within economic sectors, but also between sectors: If a Member State decides to grant support to some sectors, but not to others, the unsupported sectors may have to bear a heavier burden in view of the Member State's emission targets.
To pomeni, da bi v obravnavani zadevi priglašena shema morala zagotavljati, da je pomoč omejena na znesek, ki je potreben za preprečevanje izgube delovnih mest.
However, as was established in recital 48, the German scheme does not fall within the scope of application of the ETS Guidelines.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da priglašena shema pri preprečevanju selitve virov CO2 ni sorazmerna, saj ne vključuje dovolj varnostnih ukrepov zoper čezmerno nadomestilo (glej uvodno izjavo 93 in naslednje).
The Guidelines only apply to the third ETS trading period.
Ta ugotovitev drži tudi tukaj, saj imata preprečevanje selitve virov CO2 in preprečevanje izgube delovnih mest skupni imenovalec, ki je ohranjanje proizvodne zmogljivosti.
The Commission notes furthermore that while the aid scheme is liable to adversely affect trading conditions to a significant extent, the positive effects of the aid scheme are unclear.
Če prihaja do čezmernega nadomestila pri prvem cilju (ker pomoč ni sorazmerna z ohranjanjem proizvodne zmogljivosti), bo tako tudi pri drugem.
In particular, Germany has not convincingly established, for the reasons set out in recitals 63 et seq., that the notified scheme was appropriate and necessary.
Vsekakor je mogoče razloge za skupno negativno ravnovesje sheme v zvezi s preprečevanjem selitve virov CO2, ki so navedeni v uvodni izjavi 99 in naslednjih, uporabiti tudi tukaj: pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, namenjena kritju tekočih stroškov, ki bi jih moralo običajno nositi podjetje, je močno izkrivljajoča in je načelno ni mogoče upravičiti ne glede na to, kateri posebni cilj skupnega interesa naj bi se z njo dosegel (tj. preprečevanje izgube delovnih mest ali preprečevanje selitve virov CO2).
The Commission therefore considers that the overall balance of the notified scheme is not positive, since the scheme is liable to cause severe distortions of competition on the internal market of non-ferrous metals while the positive effects of the scheme are not convincingly established.
Dejstvo, da bi se pomoč dodeljevala priložnostno (ad hoc) in zunaj usklajenega okvira, potrjuje to analizo.
Conclusion on the prevention of carbon leakage
Če bi bila shema odobrena, bi lahko povzročila izgubo delovnih mest v drugih državah članicah, s čimer bi v Uniji sprožila tekmovanje v subvencioniranju.
The Commission therefore considers that the scheme does not constitute a necessary and appropriate means to prevent carbon leakage in a balanced manner and, at any rate, is liable to adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
SKLEPNE UGOTOVITVE
It cannot be found compatible with the internal market on that ground.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju navedenega sklenila, da priglašene sheme ni mogoče šteti za združljivo z notranjim trgom.
Even if Germany had modified the scheme in order to address the Commission's concerns on proportionality by amending or changing the method for calculating the aid, as it had offered to do, this would not alter the Commission's assessment regarding the lack of necessity and appropriateness of the measure and regarding the distortions of intra-Union competition.
Pomoč še ni bila izplačana, zato ni treba odrediti njenega vračila –
Indeed, the carbon leakage risk for 2009 has not been established, and the scheme's effect on competition would still be negative.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Prevention of loss of employment
Člen 1
Germany has also stressed the need to prevent the loss of employment in Germany which would occur, both in the non-ferrous metal industry and in downstream industries, if the non-ferrous metal producers were to reduce capacity or even to relocate their plants to third countries.
Državna pomoč, ki jo namerava Nemčija dodeliti v skladu s priglašeno upravno uredbo o podpori proizvodnji neželeznih kovin z dne 6. avgusta 2009, ni združljiva z notranjim trgom.
In its opening decision, the Commission voiced doubts as to whether the mere prevention of relocation with a view to securing employment could be seen as an objective of common interest.
Zato se ta pomoč ne sme dodeliti.
In any event, the Commission doubted the contention made by Germany that the non-ferrous metal industry had been subjected to an exogenous shock and that this event had to be considered a market failure which in turn would lead to job losses.
Člen 2
The Commission also had doubts whether operating aid to prevent the relocation of companies was the least distortive instrument to save jobs, as measures to improve the situation on the job market usually focus on sustainable measures such as improving the education and training of employees, or facilitating access to capital for new investments [64].
Nemčija v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tem sklepu obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, ki jih je sprejela za uskladitev s tem sklepom.
Interested parties have argued that the threat to a continued non-ferrous metal production in Europe, resulting from both the financial and economic crisis in 2008 and from indirect CO2 costs, was real.
Člen 3
The Commission recalls that there is no precedent in its decisional practice or in the case-law of the Courts of the Union where the alleged risk of relocation outside the Union as such had been accepted as a justification for the granting of State aid [65].
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo.
Given that Germany has not provided any convincing justification, the Commission does not consider it necessary to depart from its decision-making practice.
V Bruslju, 17. julija 2013
Even if such an objective was to be recognised, the Commission does not consider the other conditions of compatibility to be fulfilled.
Za Komisijo
Indeed, a measure is compatible with the internal market only if it is demonstrated that it has a clear incentive effect on the beneficiaries to change their behaviour in line with the desired outcome.
Podpredsednik
However, as was already described in recitals 87 et seq., in view of the short period for which aid was to be granted (less than six months) and of the alleged structural problems of the industry, the Commission considers that it has not been demonstrated how the aid measure would impact the behaviour of its beneficiaries.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22.
Moreover, any State aid needs to be limited to the minimum amount necessary to achieve the objective of common interest.
Glej sprotno opombo 1.
This means that in the case at hand, the notified scheme should ensure that aid is limited to the amount necessary to prevent job losses.
Poslovna skrivnost.
The notified scheme was found to be disproportionate in the prevention of carbon leakage since it did not include sufficient safeguards against overcompensation (see recitals 93 et seq.).
Ta podatek je zgolj predhodna ocena.
This finding also applies here, given that the prevention of carbon leakage and the prevention of job losses have, as a common denominator, the preservation of production capacity.
Dejanski znesek bi bil določen na podlagi porabe upravičencev in razpoložljivosti proračunskih sredstev.
If there is overcompensation in view of the first objective (because the aid is disproportionate in preserving production capacity), there will also be overcompensation in view of the second objective.
Nemčija je podala točnejši podatek, in sicer 47,2 milijona EUR.
In any event, the reasons why the overall balance of the scheme is negative with respect to the prevention of carbon leakage, set out in recitals 99 et seq., also apply here: operating aid to cover running costs an undertaking would normally have to bear is highly distortive and cannot, in principle, be justified, regardless of what particular objective of common interest is being pursued (that is to say, the prevention of job losses instead of the prevention of carbon leakage).
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 92 in naslednje.
The fact that the aid would have been granted ad hoc and outside the scope of any harmonised framework reinforces this analysis.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 51 in naslednje.
The scheme, if approved, could have led to job losses in other Member States, thereby triggering a subsidy race in the Union.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 69.
CONCLUSION
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 71 in naslednje.
Based on these considerations, the Commission therefore concludes that the notified scheme cannot be found compatible with the internal market.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 75.
Since the aid has not been paid out, there is no need to order its recovery,
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 76 in naslednje.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Nekatere od zainteresiranih strani so zavzele širše stališče in so se izrekle v prid dolgoročni podpori ter predložile posebna priporočila o tem, kako bi bilo treba to podporo oblikovati v skladu s (tedaj prihodnjimi) smernicami za državno pomoč v okviru ETS.
Article 1
Smernice za državno pomoč v okviru ETS so bile od takrat že sprejete, UL C 158, 5.6.2012, str. 4.
The State aid which Germany is planning to implement under the notified Administrative Regulation on the Support for the Production of Non-Ferrous Metals from 6 August 2009 is incompatible with the internal market.
Direktiva 2009/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o spremembi Direktive 2003/87/ES z namenom izboljšanja in razširitve sistema Skupnosti za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov (UL L 140, 5.6.2009, str. 63).
The aid may accordingly not be implemented.
Sklep Komisije 2010/2/EU z dne 24. decembra 2009 o določitvi seznama sektorjev in delov sektorjev v skladu z Direktivo 2003/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ki veljajo za izpostavljene visokemu tveganju premestitve emisij CO2 (UL L 1, 5.1.2010, str. 10).
Article 2
COM(2008) 108 final in COM(2010) 614 final.
Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
Tukaj opravljena ocena temelji na PDEU in Sporazumu EGP.
Article 3
Vendar bodo zaradi poenostavitve navedena le sklicevanja na določbe PDEU.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 29 in naslednje.
Done at Brussels, 17 July 2013.
Zadeva C-387/92, Banco Exterior de España, Recueil 1994, str.
For the Commission
I-877, točki 12 in 13.
Vice-President
Zadeva C-142/87, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1990, str.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22.
I-959, točka 56, in zadeva C-39/94, SFEI in drugi, Recueil 1996, str.
Cf. footnote 1.
I-3547, točka 36.
Covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.
Zadeva C-313/90, CIRFS in drugi proti Komisiji, Recueil 1993, str.
The figure is only a pre-estimate.
I-1125, točka 36; zadeva C-311/94, IJssel-Vliet, Recueil 1996, str.
The actual amount would have been determined by the beneficiaries' consumption and by the availability of budgetary resources.
I-5023, točka 43; zadeva C-351/98, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str.
Germany has given a more specific figure of EUR 47,2 million.
I-8031, točka 53.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recitals 92 et seq.
Zadeva T-459/93, Siemens proti Komisiji, Recueil 1995, str.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recitals 51 et seq.
II-1675, točka 48.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recital 69.
Zadeva C-86/89, Italija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1990, str.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recitals 71 et seq.
I-3891, točka 18.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recital 75.
UL C 244, 1.10.2004, str. 2.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recitals 76 et seq.
Uporaba navedenih smernic je bila podaljšana z nedavnim sporočilom, UL C 296, 2.10.2012, str. 3.
Some of the interested parties however took a broader stance by speaking out in favour of long-term support and by making specific recommendations on how this support should be shaped by the (then upcoming) ETS Guidelines.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 36.
The ETS Guidelines have since been adopted (OJ C 158, 5.6.2012, p. 4).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 800/2008 z dne 6. avgusta 2008 o razglasitvi nekaterih vrst pomoči za združljive s skupnim trgom z uporabo členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe (Uredba o splošnih skupinskih izjemah) (UL L 214, 9.8.2008, str. 3).
Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 63).
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 39.
Commission Decision 2010/2/EU of 24 December 2009 determining, pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, a list of sectors and subsectors which are deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage (OJ L 1, 5.1.2010, p. 10).
UL C 82, 1.4.2008, str. 1.
COM(2008) 108 final and COM(2010) 614 final.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 41 in naslednje.
The assessment conducted here is based on both the TFEU and the EEA Agreement.
UL C 83, 7.4.2009, str. 1.
For the sake of simplicity, however, reference will be made only to the provisions of the TFEU.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 40.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recitals 29 et seq.
UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str. 13.
Case C-387/92 Banco Exterior de España [1994] ECR I-877, paragraphs 12 and 13.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 37 in naslednje.
Case C-142/87 Belgium v Commission [1990] ECR I-959, paragraph 56, and Case C-39/94 SFEI and Others [1996] ECR I-3547, paragraph 36.
Glej sprotno opombo 10.
Case C-313/90 CIRFS and Others v Commission [1993] ECR I-1125, paragraph 36; Case C-311/94 IJssel-Vliet [1996] ECR I-5023, paragraph 43; Case C-351/98 Spain v Commission [2002] ECR I-8031, paragraph 53.
Združeni zadevi T-132/96 in T-143/96, Freistaat Sachsen in Volkswagen AG proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str.
Case T-459/93 Siemens v Commission [1995] ECR II-1675, paragraph 48.
II-3663, točka 167; zadeva C-301/96, Nemčija proti Komisiji, Recueil 2003, str.
Case C-86/89 Italy v Commission [1990] ECR I-3891, paragraph 18.
I-9919, točka 106.
OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2.
Glej sprotno opombo 27.
The application of those Guidelines has been prolonged by a recent Communication (OJ C 296, 2.10.2012, p. 3).
Združeni zadevi T-132/96 in T-143/96, Freistaat Sachsen in drugi proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recital 36.
II-3663, točka 167.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (‘General Block Exemption Regulation’) ( OJ L 214, 9.8.2008, p. 3).
Zadeva NN 25/2008 (ex CP 15/2008) Sklad za zajezitev tveganja WestLB, Nemčija (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases/225266/225266_843256_6_1.pdf, točka 41).
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recital 39.
Zadeva T-162/06, Kronoply proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
OJ C 82, 1.4.2008, p. 1.
2009, str.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recitals 41 et seq.
II-1, zlasti točke 65, 66, 74 in 75.
OJ C 83, 7.4.2009, p. 1.
Glej zadevo T-187/99, Agrana Zucker und Stärke proti Komisiji, Recueil 2001, str.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recital 40.
II-1587, točka 74; zadevo T-126/99, Graphischer Maschinenbau proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str.
OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13.
II-2427, točke od 41 do 43; zadevo C-390/06, Nuova Agricast, ZOdl.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recitals 37 et seq.
2008, str.
See footnote 10.
I-2577, točki 68 in 69.
Joined Cases T-132/96 and T-143/96 Freistaat Sachsen and Volkswagen AG v Commission [1999] ECR II-3663, paragraph 167; Case C-301/96 Germany v Commission [2003] ECR I-9919, paragraph 106.
Okvir Skupnosti za državno pomoč za raziskave in razvoj ter inovacije (UL C 323, 30.12.2006, str. 1), točka 1.3; smernice Skupnosti o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja (UL C 82, 1.4.2008, str. 1, točka 1.3).
See footnote 27.
Glej sprotno opombo 11.
Joined Cases T-132/96 and T-143/96 Freistaat Sachsen et al v Commission [1999] ECR II-3663, paragraph 167.
Glej sprotno opombo 12.
Case NN 25/2008 (ex CP 15/2008) WestLB risk shield, Germany (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases/225266/225266_843256_6_1.pdf, paragraph 41).
Glej sprotno opombo 39.
Case T-162/06 Kronoply v Commission [2009] ECR II-1, especially paragraphs 65, 66, 74 and 75.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 53.
Cf.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 54.
Case T-187/99 Agrana Zucker und Stärke v Commission [2001] ECR II-1587, paragraph 74; Case T-126/99, Graphischer Maschinenbau v Commission [2002] ECR II-2427, paragraphs 41-43; Case C-390/06 Nuova Agricast [2008] ECR I-2577, paragraphs 68-69.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 64.
Community framework for state aid for research and development and innovation (OJ C 323, 30.12.2006, p. 1), point 1.3; Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection (OJ C 82, 1.4.2008, p. 1), point 1.3.
Glej sprotno opombo 41.
See footnote 11.
To bi namreč privedlo do situacije, ko bi lahko sektorji, ki so v Sklepu 2010/2/EU navedeni samo zaradi neposrednih emisij CO2, prejeli nadomestilo tudi za svoje posredne stroške CO2.
See footnote 12.
Poročilo o oceni učinka, ki je priloženo smernicam za nekatere ukrepe državne pomoči v okviru sistema za trgovanje s pravicami do emisije toplogrednih plinov, 22. maj 2012, SWD(2012) 130 final, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/energy/impact_assessment_main%20report_en.pdf, str. 16.
See footnote 39.
Komisija je za obdobje pred znižanjem zgornje meje pravzaprav ugotovila, da v „literaturi o selitvi virov CO2 ni [bilo] mogoče najti empiričnega dokaza za selitev virov CO2,“ glej poročilo o oceni učinka, sprotna opomba 48, str. 13.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recital 53.
Nemška vlada je napovedala, da bo shema vzpostavljena, ko jo bo odobrila Evropska komisija.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recital 54.
ECORYS, Competitiveness of the EU Non-Ferrous Metals Industries (Konkurenčnost industrije neželeznih kovin v EU), 5. april 2011, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/eip-raw-materials/en/system/files/ged/82%20fn97624_nfm_final_report_5_april_en.pdf, str. 31.
OJ C 111, 9.4.2011, p. 22, recital 64.
Ena od zainteresiranih strani, panožno združenje, je na primer zatrjevala, da je proizvodnji bakra, ki je energetsko manj intenzivna kot proizvodnja aluminija, primerno dodeliti le polovico nadomestila (9 EUR na MWh), ki se dodeli proizvodnji aluminija (17 EUR na MWh).
See footnote 41.
To je očitno zaokrožena številka, ki temelji na natančnejši vrednosti, ki jo je Nemčija predložila med postopkom priglasitve: 0,75 tone CO2 na MWh.
Otherwise, this would create a situation where sectors listed in Decision 2012/2/EU only because of their direct CO2 emissions could be compensated also for their indirect CO2 costs.
Po navedbah […], proizvajalca aluminija, so njegovi posredni stroški CO2 leta 2009 znašali […] EUR na MWh, kar je bistveno manj, kot znaša znesek pomoči v višini 17 EUR na MWh, ki je v okviru sheme dodeljen proizvodnji aluminija.
Impact Assessment report accompanying the Guidelines on certain State aid measures in the context of Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Scheme, 22.5.2012, SWD(2012) 130 final, http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/energy/impact_assessment_main%20report_en.pdf, p. 16.
Glej tudi zadevo C-301/87, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1990, str.
For the period before the tightening of the cap, the Commission actually noted that the ‘carbon leakage literature [did] not find empirical proof of carbon leakage’, see Impact Assessment Report, footnote 48, p. 13.
I-307, točka 50.
The German Government had announced that the scheme would be set up once it had been approved by the European Commission.
Glej Sklep Komisije 86/60/EGS z dne 14. decembra 1985 o državni pomoči, dodeljeni proizvajalcu primarnega aluminija s sedežem v kraju Ludwigshafen (UL L 72, 15.3.1986, str. 30); Sklep Komisije z dne 19. novembra 2009 o državni pomoči C 38/A/04 (ex NN 58/04) in C 36/B/06 (ex NN 38/06) Italije za Alcoa Trasformazioni (UL L 227, 28.8.2010, str. 62); Sklep Komisije 2012/339/EU z dne 13. julija 2011 o državni pomoči št.
ECORYS, Competitiveness of the EU Non-Ferrous Metals Industries, 5 April 2011, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/metals-minerals/files/fn97624_nfm_final_report_5_april_en.pdf, p. 31.
SA.26117 – C 2/10 (ex NN 62/09), ki jo je Grčija dodelila družbi Aluminium of Greece SA (UL L 166, 27.6.2012, str. 83).
For instance, one interested party, a trade association, has submitted that since copper production is less energy-intensive than aluminium production, it was appropriate to grant only half the compensation (EUR 9 per MWh) that is awarded to aluminium (EUR 17 per MWh).
Glej tudi zadevo SA.33624 (ex 2011/CP) o ugodnejših cenah električne energije za ALRO Slatina S.A.
According to […], an aluminium producer, its indirect CO2 costs in 2009 amounted to EUR […] per MWh, which is significantly below the aid amount of EUR 17 per MWh the scheme applies to aluminium production.
V skladu s členom 10 Direktive 2003/87/ES v drugem obdobju trgovanja v okviru ETS „države članice vsaj 90 % pravic dodelijo brezplačno“.
See also Case C-301/87 France v Commission [1990] ECR I-307, paragraph 50.
Glej zadevo C-301/87, Francija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1990, str.
See Commission Decision 86/60/EEC of 14 December 1985 on the aid which the Land of Rheinland-Pfalz of the Federal Republic of Germany has provided to an undertaking producing primary aluminium, situated in Ludwigshafen (OJ L 72, 15.3.1986, p.
I-307, točka 50.
30); Commission Decision 2010/460/EC of 19 November 2009 on State aid measures C 38/A/04 (ex NN 58/04) and C 36/B/06 (ex NN 38/06) implemented by Italy for Alcoa Trasformazioni (OJ L 227, 28.8.2010, p. 62); Commission Decision 2012/339/EU of 13 July 2011 on the State aid No SA.26117 — C 2/10 (ex NN 62/09) implemented by Greece in favour of Aluminium of Greece SA (OJ L 166, 27.6.2012, p.
Leta 2009 so bile prve štiri proizvajalke aluminija med državami članicami EU Nemčija, Španija, Francija in Italija.
83).
Največje proizvajalke primarnega aluminija leta 2009 so bile Francija, Španija, Nizozemska in Nemčija (medtem ko je bila v obdobju 2000–2008 Nemčija na prvem mestu).
See also Case SA.33624 (ex 2011/CP) on preferential electricity tariffs for ALRO Slatina S.A.
V proizvodnji bakra sta leta 2009 prevladovali Nemčija in Poljska, sledili pa so jima Španija, Belgija, Luksemburg in skandinavske države.
(OJ C 268, 5.9.2012, p. 21).
Največje proizvajalke cinka so Španija, Finska in Nizozemska.
According to Article 10 of Directive 2003/87/EC, for the second ETS trading period, ‘Member States shall allocate at least 90 % of the allowances free of charge’.
Glej ECORYS, Competitiveness of the EU Non-Ferrous Metals Industries (Konkurenčnost industrije neželeznih kovin v EU), 5. april 2011, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/eip-raw-materials/en/system/files/ged/82%20fn97624_nfm_final_report_5_april_en.pdf, str. 43 in naslednje.
Cf.
Glej poročilo o oceni učinka, sprotna opomba 48, str. 22.
Case C-301/87 France v Commission [1990] ECR I-307, paragraph 50.
UL C 111, 9.4.2011, str. 22, uvodna izjava 77 in naslednje.