natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘relevant competent authority’ means a competent authority, other than the consolidating supervisor, which is responsible for the supervision of subsidiaries, which participate in the submission of the joint application, of an EU parent institution or an EU parent financial holding company or an EU parent mixed financial holding company in a Member State and which is required to reach a joint decision in accordance with Article 20(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on the application referred to in point (a) of Article 20(1) of that Regulation;
„zadevni pristojni organ“ pomeni pristojni organ, ki ni konsolidacijski nadzornik in je odgovoren za nadzor podrejenih družb, ki sodelujejo pri oddaji skupne vloge, nadrejene institucije EU ali nadrejenega finančnega holdinga EU ali nadrejenega mešanega finančnega holdinga EU v državi članici ter ki mora doseči skupno odločitev v skladu s členom 20(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 glede vloge iz točke (a) člena 20(1) navedene uredbe;
‘applicant’ means an EU parent institution and its subsidiaries or the subsidiaries of an EU parent financial holding company or of an EU parent mixed financial holding company, which submit an application;
„vlagatelj“ pomeni nadrejeno institucijo EU in njene podrejene družbe ali podrejene družbe nadrejenega finančnega holdinga EU ali podrejene družbe nadrejenega mešanega finančnega holdinga EU, ki predložijo vlogo;
‘assessment report’ means a report containing the assessment of an application in accordance with Article 6.
„poročilo o oceni“ pomeni poročilo, ki vsebuje oceno vloge v skladu s členom 6.
Involvement of third country supervisory authorities in the assessment process
Sodelovanje nadzornih organov tretje države v postopku ocenjevanja
The consolidating supervisor may decide to involve third country supervisory authorities which participate in the supervisory college pursuant to Article 3(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/98 [3] in the assessment of applications submitted pursuant to Article 20(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 where the applicant operates in that third country and intends to apply the methodologies concerned to exposures in that third country.
Konsolidacijski nadzornik se lahko odloči vključiti nadzorne organe tretje države, ki sodelujejo v kolegiju nadzonikov v skladu s členom 3(3) Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) 2016/98 [3] pri oceni vlog, predloženih v skladu s členom 20(1)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, kadar vlagatelj deluje v tej tretji državi in namerava uporabiti zadevne metodologije za izpostavljenosti v tej tretji državi.
In that case, both the consolidating supervisor and those authorities shall reach an agreement on the scope of involvement of the third country supervisory authorities for the following purposes:(a) providing the consolidating supervisor with their contribution to the assessment report prepared by the consolidating supervisor;
V tem primeru konsolidacijski nadzornik in ti organi dosežejo dogovor o obsegu sodelovanja nadzornih organov tretje države za naslednje namene:(a) da se konsolidacijskemu nadzorniku zagotovi njihov prispevek k poročilu o oceni, ki ga je pripravil konsolidacijski nadzornik;
adding as annexes the contributions referred to in point (a) to the assessment report prepared by the consolidating supervisor.
da se kot priloge k poročilu o oceni, ki ga je pripravil konsolidacijski nadzornik, dodajo prispevki iz točke (a).
Where the consolidating supervisor decides to involve supervisory authorities of third countries, the consolidating supervisor shall not provide the assessment reports prepared by any relevant competent authority to the third country supervisory authorities without the express consent of that relevant competent authority.
Če se konsolidacijski nadzornik odloči, da bo vključil nadzorne organe tretjih držav, konsolidacijski nadzornik ne predloži poročil o oceni, ki jih pripravi posamezni zadevni pristojni organ, nadzornim organom tretjih držav brez izrecnega soglasja tega pristojnega organa.
The consolidating supervisor shall keep the relevant competent authorities fully informed on the scope, level and nature of involvement of the third country supervisory authorities in the assessment process and the extent to which the assessment report prepared by the consolidating supervisor has benefited from their contributions.
Konsolidacijski nadzornik redno in v celoti obvešča zadevne pristojne organe o obsegu, ravni in naravi sodelovanja nadzornih organov tretje države v ocenjevalnem postopku ter v kakšnem obsegu so njihovi prispevki koristili poročilu o oceni, ki ga je pripravil konsolidacijski nadzornik.
Assessment of the completeness of the application
Ocena popolnosti vloge
Upon receipt of an application for a permission referred to in Article 143(1), Article 151(4) and (9), Article 283, Article 312(2) or Article 363 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 submitted by the applicant, the consolidating supervisor shall forward the application to the relevant competent authorities without undue delay, and in any case within 10 days.
Ob prejemu vloge za dovoljenje iz člena 143(1), člena 151(4) in (9), člena 283, člena 312(2) ali člena 363 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, ki jo je predložil vlagatelj, konsolidacijski nadzornik posreduje vlogo zadevnim pristojnim organom nemudoma oziroma najpozneje v roku 10 dni.
The consolidating supervisor and the relevant competent authorities shall assess the completeness of the application within 6 weeks of receipt of the application by the consolidating supervisor.
Konsolidacijski nadzornik in pristojni organi ocenijo popolnost vloge v šestih tednih od prejema vloge s strani konsolidacijskega nadzornika.
An application shall be deemed complete if it contains all information needed by the competent authorities in order to assess the application in accordance with the requirements set out in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and in particular in Articles 143, 144, 151, 283, 312 and 363 of that Regulation.
Vloga se šteje za popolno, če vsebuje vse informacije, ki jih potrebujejo pristojni organi za oceno vloge v skladu z zahtevami, ki so določene v Uredbi (EU) št. 575/2013 in zlasti v členih 143, 144, 151, 283, 312 in 363 navedene uredbe.
The relevant competent authorities shall provide their assessment of the completeness of the application to the consolidating supervisor.
Zadevni pristojni organi svojo oceno popolnosti vloge predložijo konsolidacijskemu nadzorniku.
The assessment referred to in paragraph 4 shall indicate any elements of the application that are assessed as incomplete or missing.
V oceni iz odstavka 4 se navedejo vsi elementi vloge, ki so ocenjeni kot nepopolni ali manjkajoči.
Where a relevant competent authority does not provide its assessment of the completeness of the application to the consolidating supervisor within the period specified in paragraph 2, the relevant competent authority shall be deemed to consider the application complete.
Če zadevni pristojni organ svoje ocene popolnosti vloge konsolidacijskemu nadzorniku ne predloži v roku iz odstavka 2, se šteje, da zadevni pristojni organ vlogo obravnava kot popolno.
Where the consolidating supervisor or any of the relevant competent authorities consider that the information provided in the application is incomplete, the consolidating supervisor shall inform the applicant of the aspects of the application which are considered to be incomplete or missing and shall provide to the applicant the opportunity to submit the missing information.
Če konsolidacijski nadzornik ali kateri koli zadevni pristojni organi meni, da so podatki v vlogi nepopolni, konsolidacijski nadzornik obvesti vlagatelja o vidikih, ki se štejejo za nepopolne ali manjkajoče, ter vlagatelju omogoči, da predloži manjkajoče informacije.
Where an applicant provides the missing information referred to in paragraph 7, the consolidating supervisor shall forward that information to the relevant competent authorities without undue delay, and in any case within 10 days from the receipt of that information.
Če vlagatelj predloži manjkajoče informacije iz odstavka 7, konsolidacijski nadzornik te informacije nemudoma posreduje zadevnim pristojnim organom oziroma najpozneje v roku 10 dni od datuma prejema te informacije.
The consolidating supervisor and the relevant competent authorities shall assess the completeness of the application taking into account the additional information within 6 weeks of receipt by the consolidating supervisor of that information in accordance with the procedure set out in paragraphs 3 to 6.
Konsolidacijski nadzornik in zadevni pristojni organi v šestih tednih od datuma, ko konsolidacijski nadzornik prejme te informacije, v skladu s postopkom iz odstavkov 3 do 6 ocenijo, ali je vloga popolna, pri čemer upoštevajo dodatne informacije.
Where a complete application has previously been assessed as incomplete, the 6-month period referred to in point (a) of Article 20(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 shall be deemed to start on the date of receipt by the consolidating supervisor of the information that completed the application.
Kadar je bila popolna vloga predhodno ocenjena kot nepopolna, se obdobje šestih mesecev iz točke (a) člena 20(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 šteje od datuma, ko konsolidacijski nadzornik prejme informacije, s katerimi se vloga dopolni.
Upon an application being assessed as complete, the consolidating supervisor shall inform the applicant and the relevant competent authorities of that fact together with the date of receipt of the complete application or the date of receipt of the information that completed the application.
Potem ko se vloga oceni kot popolna, konsolidacijski nadzornik o tem obvesti vlagatelja in zadevne pristojne organe, skupaj z datumom prejema popolne vloge ali datumom prejema informacij, ki so vlogo dopolnile.
In any case, the consolidating supervisor or any of the relevant competent authorities may require the applicant to provide additional information for the purposes of evaluating the application and reaching a joint decision on the application.
V vsakem primeru lahko konsolidacijski nadzornik ali kateri koli zadevni pristojni organi od vlagatelja zahtevajo dodatne informacije za namene ocenjevanja vloge in sprejetja skupne odločitve o vlogi.
Planning of the steps of the joint decision process
Načrtovanje ukrepov v postopku skupnega odločanja
Prior to the start of the joint decision process, the consolidating supervisor and the relevant competent authorities shall agree on a timetable of steps to be followed in the joint decision process and on the division of work.
Pred začetkom postopka skupnega odločanja se konsolidacijski nadzornik in zadevni pristojni organi dogovorijo o časovnem razporedu ukrepov, ki jih je treba upoštevati v postopku skupnega odločanja in o delitvi dela.
In case of disagreement, the consolidating supervisor shall set the timetable after considering the views and reservations expressed by the relevant competent authorities.
V primeru nesoglasja konsolidacijski nadzornik določi časovni razpored, potem ko obravnava stališča in pridržke, ki so jih izrazili zadevni pristojni organi.
The timetable shall be set within 6 weeks of receipt of a complete application.
Časovni razpored se določi v šestih tednih po prejemu popolne vloge.
Upon finalisation, the timetable shall be forwarded by the consolidating supervisor to the relevant competent authorities.
Potem ko je časovni razpored zaključen, ga konsolidacijski nadzornik pošlje zadevnim pristojnim organom.
The timetable shall include the date of receipt of the complete application pursuant to Article 4(9) and at least the following steps:
Časovni razpored vključuje datum prejema popolne vloge v skladu s členom 4(9) in vsaj naslednje ukrepe:
agreement on the timetable and the division of work between the consolidating supervisor and the relevant competent authorities;
dogovor o časovnem razporedu in delitvi dela med konsolidacijskim nadzornikom in zadevnimi pristojnimi organi;
agreement on the scope of involvement of third country supervisory authorities pursuant to Article 3;
dogovor o obsegu sodelovanja nadzornih organov tretjih držav v skladu s členom 3;
dialogue between the consolidating supervisor, the relevant competent authorities and the applicant on the details of the application, where this is deemed as necessary by the consolidating supervisor and the relevant competent authorities;
dialog med konsolidacijskim nadzornikom, zadevnimi pristojnimi organi in vlagateljem o podrobnostih glede vloge, kadar konsolidacijski nadzornik in zadevni pristojni organi menijo, da je to potrebno;
submission of the assessment reports from the relevant competent authorities to the consolidating supervisor pursuant to Article 6(2);
predložitev poročil o oceni s strani zadevnih pristojnih organov konsolidacijskemu nadzorniku v skladu s členom 6(2);
dialogue on the assessment reports between the consolidating supervisor and the relevant competent authorities pursuant to Article 7(2);
dialog o poročilih o oceni med konsolidacijskim nadzornikom in zadevnimi pristojnimi organi v skladu s členom 7(2);
preparation and submission of the draft joint decision from the consolidating supervisor to the relevant competent authorities pursuant paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 7;
konsolidacijski nadzornik pripravi osnutek skupne odločitve in ga predloži zadevnim pristojnim organom v skladu z odstavkoma 3 in 4 člena 7;
consultation on the draft joint decision with the applicant, where required by the legislation of a Member State;
posvetovanje o osnutku skupne odločitve z vlagateljem, kadar to zahteva zakonodaja države članice;
dialogue between the consolidating supervisor and the relevant competent authorities on the draft joint decision pursuant to Article 7(4);
dialog med konsolidacijskim nadzornikom in zadevnimi pristojnimi organi o osnutku skupne odločitve v skladu s členom 7(4);
submission of the draft joint decision from the consolidating supervisor to the relevant competent authorities for agreement and reaching of the joint decision pursuant to Article 8;
konsolidacijski nadzornik predloži osnutek skupne odločitve zadevnim pristojnim organom za dosego dogovora in skupne odločitve v skladu s členom 8;
communication of the joint decision to the applicant pursuant to Article 9.
sporočilo o skupni odločitvi vlagatelju v skladu s členom 9.
The timetable shall fulfil all of the following requirements:
Časovni razpored izpolnjuje vse naslednje zahteve:
it shall be proportionate to the scope of the application;
je sorazmeren z obsegom vloge;
it shall reflect the scope and complexity of each task performed by the relevant competent authorities and the consolidating supervisor, as well as the complexity of the institutions of the group to which the joint decision is to apply;
odraža obseg in kompleksnost vsake naloge, ki jo opravljajo ustrezni pristojni organi in konsolidacijski nadzornik, ter zapletenost institucij skupine, za katere velja skupna odločitev;
it shall take into account, so far as possible, the other activities being undertaken by the consolidating supervisor and the relevant competent authorities under the college supervisory examination programme referred to in Article 16 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/98.
kolikor je mogoče upošteva druge dejavnosti konsolidacijskega nadzornika in zadevnih pristojnih organov v okviru načrta nadzorniških pregledov kolegija iz člena 16 Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2016/98.
The division of work shall reflect the following:
Delitev dela odraža naslednje:
the scope and complexity of the application;
obseg in zapletenost vloge;
the materiality of the scope of the application for each institution;
pomembnost obsega vloge za vsako institucijo;
the type and location of the exposures or risks to which the application relates;
vrsto in lokacijo izpostavljenosti ali tveganj, na katera se vloga nanaša;
the extent to which exposures or risks assumed in a particular jurisdiction contribute to the materiality of changes or extensions of the models when assessed at the consolidated level;
v kolikšnem obsegu izpostavljenosti ali tveganja v določeni jurisdikciji prispevajo k pomembnosti sprememb ali razširitev modelov, če se ocenjujejo na konsolidirani ravni;
the ability of the consolidating supervisor and each relevant competent authority to execute the necessary tasks to perform an assessment and give a fully reasoned opinion.
zmožnost konsolidacijskega nadzornika in vsakega zadevnega pristojnega organa, da opravi potrebne naloge za oceno in poda v celoti utemeljeno mnenje.
For the purposes of point (c) of the first subparagraph, where the geographical location of exposures or risks is different from the location at which the exposures or risks are managed, credited or traded, the division of work shall establish separate responsibilities for the competent authorities of the Member State in which the exposures or risks are located, and for the competent authorities of the Member State in which those exposures or risks are managed, credited or traded.
Za namene točke (c) prvega pododstavka, kadar se zemljepisna lokacija izpostavljenosti ali tveganj razlikuje od lokacije, kjer se izpostavljenosti ali tveganja upravljajo, knjižijo ali se z njimi trguje, delitev dela uvede ločene odgovornosti za pristojne organe v državi članici, v kateri se nahajajo tveganja ali izpostavljenosti, in za pristojne organe v državi članici, v kateri se te izpostavljenosti ali tveganja upravljajo, knjižijo ali se z njimi trguje.
The consolidating supervisor shall communicate to the applicant an indicative date for the dialogue referred to in point (c) of paragraph 2 and an estimated date for the communication referred to in point (i) of paragraph 2.
Konsolidacijski nadzornik vlagatelju sporoči okvirni datum za dialog iz točke (c) odstavka 2 in predvideni datum za sporočilo iz točke (i) odstavka 2.
Where it becomes necessary to update the timetable or the division of work, the consolidating supervisor shall do so in consultation with the relevant competent authorities.
Kadar je treba časovni razpored ali delitev dela posodobiti, konsolidacijski nadzornik to stori ob posvetovanju z zadevnimi pristojnimi organi.
Preparation of the assessment reports
Priprava poročil o oceni
The relevant competent authorities and the consolidating supervisor shall assess the application based on the division of work established in accordance with Article 5(1).
Zadevni pristojni organi in konsolidacijski nadzornik ocenijo vlogo na podlagi delitve dela, določene v skladu s členom 5(1).
Those assessments shall take a form of assessment reports.
Te ocene so v obliki poročil o oceni.
Each relevant competent authority shall provide its assessment report to the consolidating supervisor by the date specified in the timetable pursuant to point (d) of Article 5(2).
Vsak zadevni pristojni organ pošlje svoje poročilo o oceni konsolidacijskemu nadzorniku do datuma iz časovnega razporeda v skladu s točko (d) člena 5(2).
Each assessment report shall include at least all of the following:
Vsako poročilo o oceni vključuje vsaj vse od naslednjega:
an opinion on whether or not the permission requested should be granted, based on the requirements set out in Article 143(1), Article 151(4) and (9), Article 283, Article 312(2), or Article 363 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, together with the reasoning to support the opinion;
mnenje o tem, ali naj se podeli zahtevano dovoljenje, na podlagi zahtev iz člena 143(1), člena 151(4) in (9), člena 283, člena 312(2) ali člena 363 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, skupaj z utemeljitvijo v podporo mnenju;
terms and conditions, if any, to which such permission should be subject, including corresponding reasoning and a timetable for their fulfilment;
pogoje, če sploh, ki bi morali veljati za takšno dovoljenje, vključno z ustrezno utemeljitvijo in časovnim razporedom za izpolnitev teh pogojev;
the assessments relating to the matters which competent authorities are required to assess in accordance with the requirements set out in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 which relate to the permissions referred to in Articles 143, 144, 151, 283, 312 or 363 of that Regulation;
ocene v zvezi z zadevami, ki jih morajo oceniti pristojni organi v skladu z zahtevami iz Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013, ki se nanašajo na dovoljenja iz členov 143, 144, 151, 283, 312 ali 363 navedene uredbe;
recommendations, if any, on remedying deficiencies revealed while evaluating the application and reaching a joint decision on the application.
priporočila, če sploh, za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih med ocenjevanjem vloge in sprejemanjem skupne odločitve o vlogi.
Preparation of the draft joint decision
Priprava osnutka skupne odločitve
Any assessment report referred to in Article 6 shall be communicated by the consolidating supervisor to a relevant competent authority, where that contribution is relevant to the assessment of that relevant competent authority.
Konsolidacijski nadzornik sporoči vsako poročilo o oceni iz člena 6 zadevnemu pristojnemu organu, kadar je ta prispevek pomemben za oceno tega zadevnega pristojnega organa.
The consolidating supervisor shall engage in dialogue, as referred to in the timetable pursuant to point (e) of Article 5(2), with the relevant competent authorities, based on the assessment reports prepared by the consolidating supervisor and the relevant competent authorities, with a view to preparing a draft joint decision.
Konsolidacijski nadzornik se vključi v dialog, kot je navedeno v časovnem razporedu v skladu s točko (e) člena 5(2), z zadevnimi pristojnimi organi, in sicer na podlagi poročil o oceni, ki so jih pripravili konsolidacijski nadzornik in zadevni pristojni organi, z namenom priprave osnutka skupne odločitve.
The consolidating supervisor shall prepare a fully reasoned draft joint decision.
Konsolidacijski nadzornik pripravi v celoti utemeljen osnutek skupne odločitve.
The draft joint decision shall set out each of the following items:
V osnutku skupne odločitve se navede vse naslednje:
the names of the consolidating supervisor and relevant competent authorities involved in the draft joint decision;
imena konsolidacijskega nadzornika in zadevnih pristojnih organov, ki so sodelovali pri pripravi osnutka skupne odločitve;
the name of the group of institutions and a list of all institutions within the group to which the draft joint decision relates and applies, together with details of the scope of application of the draft joint decision;
ime skupine institucij in seznam vseh institucij znotraj skupine, na katere se osnutek skupne odločitve nanaša in se zanje uporablja, skupaj s podrobnostmi o obsegu osnutka skupne odločitve;
the references to the applicable Union and national law relating to the preparation, finalisation and application of the draft joint decision;
sklicevanja na veljavno pravo Unije in nacionalno pravo, ki se nanašajo na pripravo, zaključevanje in uporabo osnutka skupne odločitve;
the date of the draft joint decision and of any relevant update thereto in case of material extensions or changes as referred to in Article 13;
datum osnutka skupne odločitve in kakršne koli pomembne posodobitve tega osnutka v primeru pomembnih razširitev ali sprememb, kot je navedeno v členu 13;
an opinion on granting the permission requested based on the assessment reports referred to in Article 6;
mnenje o podelitvi zahtevanega dovoljenja na podlagi poročil o oceni iz člena 6;
where the opinion referred to in point (e) is to grant the permission requested, the date from which that permission is granted;
če mnenje iz točke (e) podpira podelitev zahtevanega dovoljenja, datum, od katerega se dovoljenje podeli;
a brief description of the results of the assessments for each institution within the group;
kratek opis rezultatov ocen za vsako institucijo znotraj skupine;
any recommendations on remedying any deficiencies revealed while evaluating the application and reaching a joint decision on the application;
vsa priporočila za odpravo morebitnih pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih med ocenjevanjem vloge in sprejemanjem skupne odločitve o vlogi;