natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See, to that effect, Case 102/87 France v Commission [1988] ECR 4067, paragraph 19; Case C-305/89 Italy v Commission [1991] ECR I-1603, paragraph 26; and joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92 Spain v Commission [1994] ECR I-4103, paragraph 40.
308 str. 317.
See Case C-142/87 Belgium v Commission (Tubemeuse) [1990] ECR I-959, paragraph 43; See also Joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92 Spain v Commission [1994] ECR I-4103, paragraph 42.
Glej uvodno izjavo 21.
Commission Decision 2011/501/EU of 23 February 2011 on State aid No C 58/06 (ex NN 98/05) implemented by Germany for Bahnen der Stadt Monheim (BSM) and Rheinische Bahngesellschaft (RBG) in the Verkehrsverbund Rhein-Ruhr (OJ L 210, 17.8.2011, p. 1).
Kavanagh proti Irski, neprijavljeno, 31. julij 2007, irsko vrhovno sodišče (str.
Case C-44/93, Namur-Les Assurances [1994] ECR I-3829, paragraph 28.
16–17, str.
Joined Cases C-91/83 and C-127/83 Heineken [1984] ECR 3435, paragraphs 21 and 22; See also Joined Cases T-195/01 and T-207/01 Government of Gibraltar v Commission [2002] ECR II-2309, paragraphs 109 to 114.
51).
Joined Cases T-254/00, T-270/00 and T-277/00 Hotel Cipriani v Commission [2008] ECR II-3269, paragraph 362.
Nacionalni razvojni načrt za obdobje 2000–2006, str. 5.
Curley v The Governor of Arbour Hill Prison [2005] 3 I.R.
Nacionalni razvojni načrt za obdobje 2007–2013, str. 15.
308 p. 317.
Glej prejšnjo opombo, str. 15.
See recital 21 above.
Glej prejšnjo opombo, Dodatek 1.
National Development Plan 2000-06, p. 5.
Zadeva C-334/07 Ρ, Komisija proti Freistaat Sachsen, ZOdl 2008, str. 1-9465, točka 51.
National Development Plan 2007-13, p. 15.
Združene zadeve C-465/09 Ρ do C-470/09 Ρ, Diputación Foral de Vizcaya in drugi proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Ibidem, p. 15.
2011, str.
Ibidem, Appendix 1.
I-83, točki 125 in 128.
See Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 for the definition of ‘public passenger transport’ covered by that regulation.
Najnovejša je zadeva T-570/08 RENV, Deutsche Post proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2013:589, točka 167.
Case C-334/07 Ρ Commission v Freistaat Sachsen [2008] ECR 1-9465, paragraph 51.
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 651/2014 z dne 17. junija 2014 o razglasitvi nekaterih vrst pomoči za združljive z notranjim trgom pri uporabi členov 107 in 108 Pogodbe (UL L 187, 26.6.2014, str. 1).
Joined Cases C-465/09 Ρ to C-470/09 Ρ Diputación Foral de Vizcaya and Others v Commission [2011] ECR I-83, paragraphs 125 and 128.
Člen 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 68/2001.
Most recently, Case T-570/08 RENV Deutsche Post v Commission, EU:T:2013:589, paragraph 167.
Člen 3(1) in člen 3(2)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 68/2001.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty (OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, p. 1).
Glej uvodne izjave 79 do 83.
Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 68/2001.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 800/2008 z dne 6. avgusta 2008 o razglasitvi nekaterih vrst pomoči za združljive s skupnim trgom z uporabo členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe (Uredba o splošnih skupinskih izjemah) (UL L 214, 9.8.2008, str. 3).
Article 3(1) and Article 3(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 68/2001.
Nacionalna razvojna načrta, ki jih proučuje ta sklep, veljata za obdobji 2000–2006 in 2007–2013.
See recitals 79 to 83.
Nacionalni razvojni načrt za obdobje 2007–2013 se je prenehal izvajati leta 2011, ko ga je nadomestil načrt za naložbe v infrastrukturo in kapital za obdobje 2012–2016.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General block exemption Regulation) (OJ L 214, 9.8.2008, p. 3).
Skupni stroški za garažo Harristown so znašali 42,1 milijona EUR, vključevali pa so financiranje z nepovratnimi sredstvi v višini 22 milijonov EUR in lastni prispevek družbe CIÉ/Dublin Bus v višini 20,1 milijona EUR.
The National Development Plans examined by this Decision are for the periods 2000-06 and 2007-13.
Avtobusi, garažirani v garaži Harristown, se uporabljajo le za storitve v okviru obveznosti javne službe.
The National Development Plan 2007-13 was discontinued in 2011 and replaced by the Infrastructure and Capital Investment Plan 2012-16.
(v EUR)
The overall cost of the Harristown Garage was EUR 42,1 million, made up of EUR 22 million grant funding and a CIÉ/Dublin Bus own contribution of EUR 20,1 million.
CIÉ prejema nadomestilo od poznih 50. let 20. stoletja in to se z reorganizacijo CIÉ v ločene družbe leta 1986 ni spremenilo.
The buses garaged at Harristown operate only on PSO services.
Prav tako se z uvedbo memorandumov o soglasju med ministrstvom za promet ter družbama Dublin Bus and Bus Éireann leta 2003 niso spremenili sistemi nadomestil.
In that period, funding amounting to EUR 24,6 million was provided by the Department of Education and Skills to Bus Éireann for the purchase of 161 additional school buses.
Po navedbah Irske je bila to le upravna sprememba za boljše upravljanje pomoči družbi CIÉ.
That funding is additional to the amounts set out in Table 4 for the annual payments.
Vsa zagotovljena pomoč je namenjena financiranju pravne obveznosti za zagotovitev storitev javnega potniškega prevoza iz zakonov o prometu.
(EUR)
Irska trdi, da nacionalna razvojna načrta za obdobji 2000–2006 in 2007–2013 ne vplivata na dejansko vsebino prvotne sheme ali dejansko delovanje nacionalnega razvojnega načrta za obdobje 1993–1999.
Compensation has been provided to CIÉ since the late 1950s, and that did not change with the reorganisation of CIÉ into separate companies in 1986.
Dejanska vsebina in dejansko delovanje nacionalnih razvojnih načrtov kot dokumentov politike se nista spremenila.
Nor did the compensation mechanism change with the introduction of the Memoranda of Understanding between the Department of Transport and Dublin Bus and Bus Éireann in 2003.
Ne izkrivlja konkurence niti ni možnosti, da bi jo izkrivljalo.
According to Ireland, this was simply an administrative change to better manage the aid provided to CIÉ.
Prav tako ne vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami.
All aid is provided to fund the legal obligation to provide the public passenger transport services laid down in the Transport Acts.
Družbo CIÉ urejajo določbe zakona o prometu iz leta 1958.
It is of high importance that a lay person be able to distinguish readily between documents having the force of law and all others.’ .
Vendar so irski organi potrdili, da sedanja računovodska pravila temeljijo na posodobljenem sporazumu iz leta 1975 [64].
However, the Irish authorities confirmed that the current accounting arrangements are based on an updated agreement from 1975 [64].
CIÉ je po zakonu ustanovljeno podjetje v državni lasti, ustanovljeno na podlagi zakona o prometu iz leta 1950.
In a letter to the Commission of 23 November 2012, Ireland maintained that ‘[t]he accounting document of 1975 remains the core document in relation to the financial arrangements between the Department [of Education and Skills] and Bus Éireann’.
Zakon o prometu iz leta 1950 in zakon o prometu iz leta 1958 določata splošne dolžnosti CIÉ in zahtevane obveznosti.
CIÉ is a State owned statutory corporation, which had been set up by the Transport Act, 1950.
četrtič, če podjetje, ki se mu naloži izpolnjevanje obveznosti javne službe, v konkretnem primeru ni izbrano s postopkom oddaje javnega naročila, ki omogoča, da se izbere tisti ponudnik, ki lahko te storitve opravlja z najnižjimi stroški za skupnost, se mora raven potrebnega nadomestila določiti na podlagi analize stroškov, ki bi jih povprečno, dobro vodeno podjetje, ki je ustrezno opremljeno s prevoznimi sredstvi, zato da lahko zadosti zahtevam javne službe, imelo pri izpolnjevanju teh obveznosti ob upoštevanju realiziranih prejemkov in razumnega dobička zaradi izpolnjevanja teh obveznosti.
The Transport Act, 1950 and Transport Act, 1958 set out the general duties of CIÉ and the obligations required.
Bus Éireann
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/636
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/636
of 22 April 2015
z dne 22. aprila 2015
terminating the examination procedure concerning the measures imposed by the separate customs territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (‘Chinese Taipei’) affecting patent protection in respect of recordable compact disks
o ustavitvi postopka pregleda v zvezi z ukrepi, uvedenimi v ločenem carinskem območju Tajvana, Penghuja, Kinmena in Matsuja („Kitajski Tajpej“), ki učinkujejo na zaščito patentov v zvezi s kompaktnimi diski za snemanje
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 of 22 December 1994 laying down Community procedures in the field of the common commercial policy in order to ensure the exercise of the Community's rights under international trade rules, in particular those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation [1], and in particular Article 11(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3286/94 z dne 22. decembra 1994 o določitvi postopkov Skupnosti na področju skupne trgovinske politike za zagotovitev izvrševanja pravic Skupnosti po mednarodnih pravilih trgovanja, zlasti tistih, ki so dogovorjena v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije [1], in zlasti člena 11(1) Uredbe,
A. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. OZADJE POSTOPKA
On 15 January 2007, Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV (‘Philips’ or ‘the complainant’) lodged a complaint under Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 (the Trade Barriers Regulation (‘the TBR’)).
Podjetje Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. („Philips“ ali „pritožnik“) je 15. januarja 2007 vložilo pritožbo na podlagi člena 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 3286/94 („Uredba o trgovinskih ovirah“).
The complaint alleged that the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (‘Chinese Taipei’) had:
V pritožbi je bilo navedeno, da je ločeno carinsko območje Tajvana, Penghuja, Kinmena in Matsuja („Kitajski Tajpej“):
infringed Article 28 of the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (‘TRIPS Agreement’) by granting ‘compulsory licences’ in respect of five patents in Compact Recordable Disc (‘CD-R’) technology owned by the complainant, to a company established in Chinese Taipei called Gigastorage Corporation (‘Gigastorage’), and that the infringement of Article 28 was not justified under Article 31 of the TRIPS Agreement;
kršilo člen 28 Sporazuma STO o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine („Sporazum TRIPS“) s tem, da je odobrilo „obvezne licence“ za pet patentov za tehnologijo kompaktnih diskov za snemanje („CD-R“), katere lastnik je pritožnik, družbi Gigastorage Corporation („Gigastorage“) s sedežem v Kitajskem Tajpeju, in da kršitev člena 28 na podlagi člena 31 Sporazuma TRIPS ni bila upravičena;
infringed the procedural requirements of Article 31 of the TRIPS Agreement.
kršilo proceduralne zahteve iz člena 31 Sporazuma TRIPS.
The complainant alleged that these violations constituted obstacles to trade in the sense of Article 2(1) of the TBR and that these obstacles to trade caused adverse trade effects within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the TBR.
Pritožnik je navedel, da te kršitve pomenijo trgovinske ovire v smislu člena 2(1) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah in da te trgovinske ovire povzročajo škodljive učinke na trgovino v smislu člena 2(4) navedene uredbe.
The complainant also alleged that it was in the Community interest to protect the patent rights at issue.
Pritožnik je prav tako trdil, da je zaščita spornih patentnih pravic v interesu Skupnosti.
The Commission decided therefore, after consultation of the Advisory Committee established by the Regulation, that there was sufficient evidence to justify initiating an examination procedure for the purpose of considering the legal and factual issues involved.
Komisija je zato po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom, ustanovljenim z Uredbo, sklenila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi, da se lahko začne postopek pregleda, namenjen proučitvi pravnih vprašanj in dejstev v tej zadevi.
Consequently, an examination procedure was initiated on 1 March 2007.
Zato je bil 1. marca 2007 uveden postopek pregleda.
B. FINDINGS OF THE EXAMINATION PROCEDURE
B. UGOTOVITVE POSTOPKA PREGLEDA
In January 2008 the examination concluded that the compulsory licence provisions of the Patent Act of Chinese Taipei, Articles 76 and 77, were in violation of Article 28 of the TRIPS Agreement and raised issues of general concern for the protection of intellectual property rights.
Januarja 2008 je bilo med pregledom ugotovljeno, da določbe o obveznih licencah iz členov 76 in 77 Zakona o patentih Kitajskega Tajpeja kršijo člen 28 Sporazuma TRIPS; izpostavljena so bila tudi vprašanja splošnega pomena za varstvo pravic intelektualne lastnine.
Article 76 of the Patent Act of Chinese Taipei was concluded to be inconsistent with the TRIPS Agreement's protection of the exclusive rights granted by a patent under Article 28, as it permitted the granting of a compulsory licence in circumstances where there had been no more than a failure to agree terms and conditions in a reasonable period of time.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da člen 76 Zakona o patentih Kitajskega Tajpeja ni skladen z varstvom ekskluzivnih pravic, podeljenih s patentom na podlagi člena 28 Sporazuma TRIPS, saj dovoljuje odobritev obveznih licenc v okoliščinah, ko dogovor o določilih in pogojih ni bil dosežen v razumnem roku.
The Commission concluded that the infringement of Article 28 was not justified by Article 31 of the TRIPS Agreement.
Komisija je ugotovila, da kršitev člena 28 ni bila utemeljena v skladu s členom 31 Sporazuma TRIPS.
The Commission also concluded that Article 31(b)(c) and (f) of the TRIPS Agreement were not respected.
Komisija je prav tako ugotovila, da člen 31(b), (c) in (f) Sporazuma TRIPS ni bil spoštovan.
It was concluded the Chinese Taipei authorities misinterpreted ‘reasonable commercial terms and conditions’ from the TRIPS Agreement and the Patent Act of Chinese Taipei, and so the decisions of the Chinese Taipei Authorities were in violation of Article 31(b) of the TRIPS Agreement.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so organi Kitajskega Tajpeja napačno razlagali „razumna trgovinska določila in pogoje“, opredeljene v Sporazumu TRIPS in Zakonu o patentih Kitajskega Tajpeja, zato so odločitve organov Kitajskega Tajpeja pomenile kršitev člena 31(b) Sporazuma TRIPS.
It was also concluded that Chinese Taipei infringed Article 31(c) of the TRIPS Agreement by failing to put in place any limits to the use of compulsory licences.
Prav tako je bilo ugotovljeno, da je Kitajski Tajpej kršil člen 31(c) Sporazuma TRIPS, ker ni uvedel nobenih omejitev glede uporabe obveznih licenc.
The investigation also found a violation of Article 31(f) of the TRIPS Agreement as the condition that the licences be used predominantly for the supply of the domestic market was not respected; Gigastorage predominantly supplied the export market.
Pri pregledu je bila ugotovljena tudi kršitev člena 31(f) Sporazuma TRIPS, saj ni bil spoštovan pogoj, da se licence lahko uporabljajo pretežno za oskrbovanje domačega trga; družba Gigastorage je namreč pretežno oskrbovala izvozni trg.
These measures were found to constitute an obstacle to trade in the sense of Article 2(1) of the TBR.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so ti ukrepi predstavljali trgovinsko oviro v smislu člena 2(1) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah.
The Commission found these obstacles to trade caused adverse trade effects to the complainant and threatened to cause adverse trade effects which would apply to any EU operator seeking patent protection in Chinese Taipei.
Komisija je ugotovila, da so te trgovinske ovire povzročale škodljive učinke na trgovino za pritožnika in grozile s povzročanjem škodljivih učinkov na trgovino, kar bi veljalo za vsako podjetje iz EU, ki bi želelo zaščititi patent v Kitajskem Tajpeju.
The Commission therefore considered that the Chinese Taipei authorities' decisions based on the Patent Act of Chinese Taipei caused adverse trade effects within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the TBR.
Komisija je zato ocenila, da so odločitve organov Kitajskega Tajpeja, sprejete na podlagi Zakona o patentih Kitajskega Tajpeja, povzročile škodljive učinke na trgovino v smislu člena 2(4) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah.
The Commission also concluded there was Community interest in challenging the measures at issue.
Komisija je ugotovila tudi, da je izpodbijanje spornih ukrepov v interesu Skupnosti.
The Commission therefore determined that the authorities of Chinese Taipei should amend the Patent Act of Chinese Taipei and ensure the precedential effects of the measures were limited, including by ensuring that the compulsory licences were revoked in their entirety.
Komisija je zato določila, da morajo organi Kitajskega Tajpeja spremeniti Zakon o patentih Kitajskega Tajpeja ter zagotoviti, da so precedenčni učinki ukrepov omejeni, vključno z zagotovitvijo, da so bile obvezne licence v celoti razveljavljene.
C. DEVELOPMENTS AFTER THE END OF THE INVESTIGATION
C. RAZVOJ DOGODKOV PO KONCU PREISKAVE
Following the examination, the authorities of Chinese Taipei worked on a number of amendments to their national Patent Act and implementing provisions which took effect on 1 January 2013 when a new Patent Act entered into force.
Po pregledu so organi Kitajskega Tajpeja pripravili več sprememb nacionalnega Zakona o patentih in izvedbenih določb, ki so začele veljati 1. januarja 2013, ko je stopil v veljavo nov Zakon o patentih.
These commitments are considered satisfactory by the complainant.
Na podlagi zgornje analize se šteje, da je postopek pregleda privedel do zadovoljivega stanja v zvezi s trgovinskimi ovirami, opisanimi v pritožbi, ki jo je vložilo podjetje Philips.
D. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Postopek pregleda bi bilo zato treba ustaviti v skladu s členom 11(1) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah.
In view of the above analysis, it is considered that the examination procedure has led to a satisfactory situation with regard to the obstacles that faced trade as alleged in the complaint lodged by Philips.
Ukrepi, določeni v tem sklepu, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za trgovinske ovire –
The examination procedure should therefore be terminated in accordance with Article 11(1) of the TBR.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Trade Barriers Committee,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Postopek pregleda v zvezi z ukrepi, uvedenimi v Kitajskem Tajpeju, ki učinkujejo na zaščito patentov v zvezi s kompaktnimi diski za snemanje, se ustavi.
The examination procedure concerning the measures imposed by Chinese Taipei affecting patent protection in respect of recordable compact disks is hereby terminated.
Ta sklep začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Article 2
V Bruslju, 22. aprila 2015
Done at Brussels, 22 April 2015.
Članica Komisije
For the Commission
UL L 349, 31.12.1994, str. 71.
Member of the Commission
V zvezi z razveljavitvijo obveznih licenc so bile težave, s katerimi se je srečeval pritožnik, leta 2007 rešene v obojestransko zadovoljstvo.
Decision (EU) 2015/642 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep (EU) 2015/642 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2014/015 GR/Attica publishing from Greece)
o uporabi sredstev Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji (vloga EGF/2014/015 GR/Attica publishing activities iz Grčije)
The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide support for workers made redundant and self-employed persons whose activity has ceased as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation, as a result of a continuation of the global financial and economic crisis addressed in Regulation (EC) No 546/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], or as a result of a new global financial and economic crisis and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.
Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji (ESPG) je bil ustanovljen za zagotavljanje podpore delavcem, ki so postali presežni, in samozaposlenim osebam, ki so prenehale opravljati svojo dejavnost zaradi velikih strukturnih sprememb v svetovnih trgovinskih tokovih, ki so posledica globalizacije, zaradi še vedno trajajoče svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize, ki je predmet Uredbe (ES) št. 546/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3], ali nove svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize, ter za pomoč pri njihovi ponovni vključitvi na trg dela.
Greece submitted an application to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in 46 enterprises operating in the NACE Rev. 2 division 58 (publishing activities) [5] in the NUTS 2 level region of Attica (EL 30) in Greece, on 4 September 2014 and supplemented it by additional information as provided by Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013.
Grčija je 4. septembra 2014 predložila vlogo za uporabo sredstev ESPG v zvezi s presežnimi delavci v 46 podjetjih, ki delujejo v panogi, razvrščeni v oddelek 58 NACE po reviziji 2 (založništvo) [5], v regiji Atika NUTS 2 (EL 30) v Grčiji, ter jo dopolnila z dodatnimi informacijami, kakor je določeno v členu 8(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1309/2013.
This application complies with the requirements for determining a financial contribution from the EGF as laid down in Article 13 of Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013.
Vloga izpolnjuje zahteve za določitev finančnega prispevka iz ESPG v skladu s členom 13 Uredbe (EU) št. 1309/2013.
The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution of an amount of EUR 3746700 for the application submitted by Greece,
Zato bi bilo treba uporabiti sredstva ESPG, da se zagotovi finančni prispevek v višini 3746700 EUR za vlogo, ki jo je predložila Grčija –
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2015, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 3746700 in commitment and payment appropriations.
V splošnem proračunu Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2015 se iz Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji uporabi vsota 3746700 EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvah plačil.
Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the statistical classification of economic activities NACE Revision 2 and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3037/90 as well as certain EC regulations on specific statistical domains (OJ L 393, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Uredba (ES) št. 1893/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o uvedbi statistične klasifikacije gospodarskih dejavnosti NACE Rev.
Decision (EU) 2015/643 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep (EU) 2015/643 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2014/016 IE/Lufthansa Technik from Ireland)
o uporabi sredstev Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji (vloga EGF/2014/016 IE/Lufthansa Technik, Irska)
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 [1], and in particular Article 15(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1309/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o Evropskem skladu za prilagoditev globalizaciji (2014 – 2020) in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1927/2006 [1] ter zlasti člena 15(4) Uredbe,