natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When deciding which applicants in clear need of international protection should be relocated from Italy and from Greece, priority should be given to vulnerable applicants within the meaning of Articles 21 and 22 of Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [5].
Poleg tega bi morali biti prosilci obveščeni o postopku premestitve iz tega sklepa in seznanjeni z odločitvijo o premestitvi, ki predstavlja odločitev o predaji v smislu člena 26 Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013.
In this respect, any special needs of applicants, including health, should be of primary concern.
Ker prosilec v skladu s pravom EU nima pravice izbrati države članice, ki bo odgovorna za obravnavo njegove prošnje, bi se lahko na pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva zoper odločitev o premestitvi, ki je določena v Uredbi (EU) št. 604/2013, skliceval samo, kadar uveljavlja svoje temeljne pravice.
The best interests of the child should always be a primary consideration.
Države članice lahko v skladu s členom 27 navedene uredbe v nacionalnem pravu določijo, da pritožba zoper odločitev o predaji samodejno ne odloži predaje prosilca, temveč ima zadevna oseba možnost, da zahteva odložitev izvršitve odločitve o predaji, dokler se obravnava njena pritožba.
In addition, in order to decide which specific Member State should be the Member State of relocation, specific account should be given to the specific qualifications and characteristics of the applicants concerned, such as their language skills and other individual indications based on demonstrated family, cultural or social ties which could facilitate their integration into the Member State of relocation.
Prosilci pred predajo državi članici premestitve in po njej uživajo pravice in jamstva, ki so določeni v Direktivi 2013/32/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6] in Direktivi 2013/33/EU, tudi v zvezi z njihovimi posebnimi potrebami glede sprejema in postopkovnimi potrebami.
In the case of particularly vulnerable applicants, consideration should be given to the capacity of the Member State of relocation to provide adequate support to those applicants and to the necessity of ensuring a fair distribution of those applicants among Member States.
Poleg tega se Uredba (EU) št. 603/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7] še naprej uporabljata za prosilce, za katere se uporablja ta sklep.
With due respect for the principle of non-discrimination, Member States of relocation may indicate their preferences for applicants based on the above information on the basis of which Italy and Greece, in consultation with EASO and, where applicable, liaison officers, may compile lists of possible applicants identified for relocation to that Member State.
Sprejeti bi bilo treba ukrepe za preprečevanje sekundarnega gibanja premeščenih oseb iz države članice premestitve v druge države članice, kar bi lahko otežilo učinkovito izvajanje tega sklepa.
The appointment by Member States of liaison officers in Italy and in Greece should facilitate the effective implementation of the relocation procedure, including the appropriate identification of the applicants who could be relocated, taking into account in particular their vulnerability and qualifications.
Zlasti bi bilo treba prosilce seznaniti s posledicami nadaljnjega nedovoljenega gibanja med državami članicami in dejstvom, da se jim pravice iz naslova mednarodne zaščite, ki jim jo prizna država članica premestitve, načeloma priznajo samo v tej državi članici.
As regards both the appointment of liaison officers in Italy and in Greece and the fulfilment of their tasks, the Member State of relocation and Italy and Greece should exchange all relevant information and continue cooperating closely throughout the relocation procedure.
Poleg tega bi morala v skladu s cilji, določenimi v Direktivi 2013/33/EU, harmonizacija pogojev za sprejem med državami članicami prispevati k omejevanju sekundarnega gibanja prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito, na katero vplivajo različni pogoji za njihov sprejem.
The legal and procedural safeguards set out in Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 remain applicable in respect of applicants covered by this Decision.
Države članice bi morale z namenom doseganja istega cilja razmisliti o uvedbi obveznosti poročanja ter prosilcem za mednarodno zaščito zagotoviti materialne pogoje za sprejem, ki vključujejo nastanitev, hrano in obleko izključno v naravi, po potrebi pa tudi zagotoviti, da se prosilci neposredno predajo državi članici premestitve.
In addition, applicants should be informed of the relocation procedure set out in this Decision and be notified with the relocation decision which constitutes a transfer decision within the meaning of Article 26 of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013.
Prav tako države članice med obravnavo prošenj za mednarodno zaščito, kot je določeno v pravnem redu EU s področja azila in schengenskem pravnem redu, razen iz resnih humanitarnih razlogov, prosilcem ne bi smele niti zagotoviti nacionalnih potnih listin niti jim nameniti drugih spodbud, na primer finančnih, ki bi lahko olajšale njihovo nedovoljeno gibanje v druge države članice.
Considering that an applicant does not have the right under EU law to choose the Member State responsible for his or her application, the applicant should have the right to an effective remedy against the relocation decision in line with Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, only in view of ensuring respect for his or her fundamental rights.
V primeru nedovoljenega gibanja v druge države članice bi bilo treba prosilce poslati nazaj v državo članico premestitve v skladu s pravili iz Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013.
In line with Article 27 of that Regulation, Member States may provide in their national law that the appeal against the transfer decision does not automatically suspend the transfer of the applicant but that the person concerned has the opportunity to request a suspension of the implementation of the transfer decision pending the outcome of his or her appeal.
Da bi se izognili sekundarnemu gibanju upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite, bi morale države članice slednje tudi obvestiti o pogojih, pod katerimi lahko zakonito vstopijo v drugo državo članico in tam prebivajo, ter bi lahko uvedle obveznosti poročanja.
Before and after being transferred to the Member States of relocation, applicants enjoy the rights and guarantees set up in Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] and Directive 2013/33/EU, including in relation to their special reception and procedural needs.
V skladu z Direktivo 2008/115/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8] bi morale države članice od upravičenca do mednarodne zaščite, ki nezakonito biva na njihovem ozemlju, zahtevati, naj se nemudoma vrne v državo članico premestitve.
In addition, Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [7] remains applicable in respect of applicants covered by this Decision.
V primeru, da se oseba ne želi vrniti prostovoljno, bi bilo treba vrnitev v državo članico premestitve uveljaviti na silo.
Measures should be taken in order to avoid secondary movements of relocated persons from the Member State of relocation to other Member States which could hamper the efficient application of this Decision.
Poleg tega – in če tako določa nacionalno pravo – lahko država članica, ki je v primeru prisilne vrnitve v državo članico premestitve uveljavila vrnitev, odloči, da izda prepoved vstopa v državo, s čimer bi upravičencu za določeno obdobje preprečila ponovni vstop na svoje ozemlje.
In particular, applicants should be informed of the consequences of onward irregular movement within the Member States and of the fact that, if the Member State of relocation grants them international protection, in principle, they are only entitled to the rights attached to international protection in that Member State.
Ker je namen tega sklepa ukrepanje v izrednih razmerah in podpora Italiji in Grčiji pri krepitvi njunih azilnih sistemov, bi moralo to tema državama omogočiti, da ob pomoči Komisije skleneta dvostranske dogovore z Islandijo, Lihtenštajnom, Norveško in Švico o premestitvi oseb, ki spadajo na področje uporabe tega sklepa.
Additionally, in line with the objectives set out in Directive 2013/33/EU, the harmonisation of reception conditions amongst Member States should help to limit secondary movements of applicants for international protection influenced by the variety of conditions for their reception.
Takšni dogovori bi morali odražati tudi osrednje elemente tega sklepa, zlasti tiste, ki se nanašajo na postopek premestitve ter pravice in obveznosti prosilcev, pa tudi tiste, ki se nanašajo na Uredbo (EU) št. 604/2013.
With a view to reaching the same objective, Member States should consider imposing reporting obligations and providing applicants for international protection with material reception conditions that include housing, food and clothing only in kind, as well as, where appropriate, ensuring that applicants are directly transferred to the Member State of relocation.
Specifično podporo, ki se zagotovi Italiji in Grčiji prek programa premestitve, bi bilo treba dopolniti z dodatnimi ukrepi, in sicer od prihoda državljanov tretjih držav na ozemlje Italije in Grčije do zaključka vseh veljavnih postopkov, ki jih usklajujejo EASO in druge zadevne agencije, npr. Frontex, ki usklajujejo vrnitev državljanov tretjih držav brez pravice ostati na ozemlju, skladno z določbami Direktive 2008/115/ES.
Likewise, during the period of the examination of applications for international protection, as provided in the asylum and Schengen acquis, except for serious humanitarian reasons, Member States should neither provide applicants with national travel documents, nor give them other incentives, such as financial ones, which could facilitate their irregular movements to other Member States.
Ker ciljev tega sklepa države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi obsega ali učinkov predlaganega ukrepa lažje dosežejo na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
In the event of irregular movements to other Member States, applicants should be sent back to the Member State of relocation pursuant to the rules set out in Regulation (EU) No 604/2013.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta sklep ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
In order to avoid secondary movements of beneficiaries of international protection, Member States should also inform the beneficiaries about the conditions under which they may legally enter and stay in another Member State and should be able to impose reporting obligations.
Ta sklep spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, priznana z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
Pursuant to Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [8], Member States should require a beneficiary of international protection who is staying irregularly on their territories to go back immediately to the Member State of relocation.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 21) o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, in brez poseganja v člen 4 navedenega protokola ti dve državi članici ne sodelujeta pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanju ni zavezujoč in se v njiju ne uporablja.
In case the person refuses to return voluntarily, return to the Member State of relocation should be enforced.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 22) o stališču Danske, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoč in se v njej ne uporablja.
Furthermore, if provided for in national law, in the case of enforced return to the Member State of relocation, the Member State which enforced the return may decide to issue a national entry ban that would prevent the beneficiary, for a certain period of time, from re-entering the territory of that specific Member State.
Glede na nujnost razmer bi moral ta sklep začeti veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije –
As the purpose of this Decision is to address an emergency situation and to support Italy and Greece in reinforcing their asylum systems, it should allow them to make, with the assistance of the Commission, bilateral arrangements with Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland on the relocation of persons falling within the scope of this Decision.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Such arrangements should also reflect the core elements of this Decision, in particular those relating to the relocation procedure and the rights and obligations of applicants as well as those relating to Regulation (EU) No 604/2013.
Člen 1
The specific support provided to Italy and to Greece through the relocation scheme should be complemented by additional measures, from the arrival of third-country nationals on the territory of Italy or of Greece until the completion of all applicable procedures, coordinated by EASO and other relevant Agencies, such as Frontex coordinating the return of third-country nationals not having the right to remain on the territory, in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC.
Predmet urejanja
Since the objectives of this Decision cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (‘TEU’).
Ta sklep določa začasne ukrepe na področju mednarodne zaščite v korist Italije in Grčije, da bi ju podprli pri boljšem obvladovanju izrednih razmer, ki so posledica nenadnega prihoda državljanov tretjih držav na njuni ozemlji.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
Člen 2
This Decision respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Opredelitev pojmov
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, those Member States are not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and are not bound by it or subject to its application.
V tem sklepu se uporabljajo naslednje opredelitve pojmov:
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
„prošnja za mednarodno zaščito“ pomeni prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito, kakor je opredeljena v točki (h) člena 2 Direktive 2011/95/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9];
In view of the urgency of the situation, this Decision should enter into force on the date following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,
„prosilec“ pomeni državljana tretje države ali osebo brez državljanstva, ki je vložila prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito, v zvezi s katero še ni bila sprejeta dokončna odločitev;
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
„mednarodna zaščita“ pomeni status begunca in status subsidiarne zaščite, kakor sta opredeljena v točkah (e) oziroma (g) člena 2 Direktive 2011/95/EU;
Article 1
„družinski člani“ pomenijo družinske člane, kakor so opredeljeni v točki (g) člena 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013;
Subject-matter
„premestitev“ pomeni transfer prosilca z ozemlja države članice, ki je glede na merila iz poglavja III Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013 odgovorna za obravnavo njegove prošnje za mednarodno zaščito, na ozemlje države članice premestitve;
This Decision establishes provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece in view of supporting them in better coping with an emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries in those Member States.
„država članica premestitve“ pomeni državo članico, ki postane odgovorna za obravnavo prošnje za mednarodno zaščito v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 604/2013, ki jo je prosilec vložil po tem, ko je bil premeščen na ozemlje te države članice.
For the purposes of this Decision, the following definitions apply:
V skladu s tem sklepom se premestijo samo prosilci, ki so prošnje za mednarodno zaščito vložili v Italiji ali v Grčiji in za katere bi sicer ti državi bili odgovorni v skladu z merili za določitev odgovorne države članice iz poglavja III Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013.
‘application for international protection’ means an application for international protection as defined in point (h) of Article 2 of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [9];
V skladu s tem sklepom se premesti samo prosilec iz države, za katero delež ugodno rešenih prošenj za mednarodno zaščito med vsemi odločitvami, ki se v smislu poglavja III Direktive 2013/32/EU sprejmejo v postopkih na prvi stopnji v zvezi s prošnjami za mednarodno zaščito, po najnovejših razpoložljivih posodobljenih četrtletnih podatkih Eurostata za povprečje na ravni Unije, znaša najmanj 75 %.
‘applicant’ means a third-country national or a stateless person who has made an application for international protection in respect of which a final decision has not yet been taken;
Pri osebah brez državljanstva se upošteva država prejšnjega običajnega prebivališča.
‘international protection’ means refugee status and subsidiary protection status as defined in points (e) and (g), respectively, of Article 2 of Directive 2011/95/EU;
Četrtletna poročila se upoštevajo samo glede prosilcev, ki še niso bili uvrščeni med prosilce, ki bi lahko bili premeščeni v skladu s členom 5(3) tega sklepa.
‘family members’ means family members as defined in point (g) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
Člen 4
‘relocation’ means the transfer of an applicant from the territory of the Member State which the criteria laid down in Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 indicate as responsible for examining his or her application for international protection to the territory of the Member State of relocation;
Premestitev prosilcev v države članice
‘Member State of relocation’ means the Member State which becomes responsible for examining the application for international protection pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of an applicant following his or her relocation in the territory of that Member State.
Po dogovoru, doseženem med državami članicami z resolucijo z dne 20. julija 2015 predstavnikov vlad držav članic, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, o premestitvi 40000 oseb, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, iz Italije in iz Grčije:
Article 3
se iz Italije na ozemlja drugih držav članic premesti 24000 prosilcev;
Scope
se iz Grčije na ozemlja drugih držav članic premesti 16000 prosilcev.
Relocation pursuant to this Decision shall only take place in respect of an applicant who has lodged his or her application for international protection in Italy or in Greece and for whom those States would have otherwise been responsible pursuant to the criteria for determining the Member State responsible set out in Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013.
Člen 5
Relocation pursuant to this Decision shall only be applied in respect of an applicant belonging to a nationality for which the proportion of decisions granting international protection among decisions taken at first instance on applications for international protection as referred to in Chapter III of Directive 2013/32/EU is, according to the latest available updated quarterly Union-wide average Eurostat data, 75 % or higher.
Postopek premestitve
In the case of stateless persons, the country of former habitual residence shall be taken into account.
Za upravno sodelovanje, ki je potrebno za izvajanje tega sklepa, vsaka država članica določi nacionalno kontaktno točko ter njen naslov sporoči drugim državam članicam in EASO.
Quarterly updates shall only be taken into account in respect of applicants who have not already been identified as applicants who could be relocated in accordance with Article 5(3) of this Decision.
Države članice v povezavi z EASO in drugimi ustreznimi agencijami sprejmejo vse ukrepe, potrebne za neposredno sodelovanje in izmenjavo informacij med pristojnimi organi, vključno z navedbo razlogov iz odstavka 7.
Article 4
Države članice v rednih časovnih presledkih in vsaj vsake tri mesece sporočijo število prosilcev, ki jih je mogoče hitro premestiti na njihovo ozemlje, in druge pomembne informacije.
Relocation of applicants to Member States
Italija in Grčija na podlagi teh informacij in ob podpori EASO, po potrebi pa tudi uradnikov za zvezo držav članic iz odstavka 8 tega člena, določita posamezne prosilce, ki bi jih bilo mogoče premestiti v druge države članice, ter kontaktnim točkam teh držav članic čim prej sporočita vse ustrezne informacije.
Following agreement reached between Member States through the Resolution of 20 July 2015 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on relocating from Italy and from Greece 40000 persons in clear need of international protection:
Prednost pri tem imajo ranljivi prosilci v smislu členov 21 in 22 Direktive 2013/33/EU.
24000 applicants shall be relocated from Italy to the territory of the other Member States;
Po tem, ko država članica premestitve to odobri, Italija in Grčija za vsakega prosilca, ki je bil določen za premestitev, čim prej in ob posvetovanju z EASO sprejmeta odločitev o premestitvi v posamezno državo članico premestitve in ga s to odločitvijo seznanita v skladu s členom 6(4).
16000 applicants shall be relocated from Greece to the territory of the other Member States.
Država članica lahko odloči, da se premestitev prosilca ne odobri, le če obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi iz odstavka 7 tega člena.
Article 5
Premestitev prosilcev, za katere se v skladu z obveznostmi iz člena 9 Uredbe (EU) št. 603/2013 zahteva odvzem prstnih odtisov, se lahko predlaga le, če so bili njihovi prstni odtisi odvzeti in posredovani centralnemu sistemu Eurodac v skladu z navedeno uredbo.
Relocation procedure
Premestitev prosilca na ozemlje države članice premestitve se izvede čim prej po datumu seznanitve zadevne osebe z odločitvijo o premestitvi v skladu s členom 6(4).
For the purpose of the administrative cooperation required to implement this Decision, each Member State shall appoint a national contact point, whose address it shall communicate to the other Member States and to EASO.
Italija in Grčija državi članici premestitve sporočita datum in uro predaje ter vse druge relevantne informacije.
Member States shall, in liaison with EASO and other relevant agencies, take all the appropriate measures to establish direct cooperation and an exchange of information between the competent authorities, including about the grounds referred to in paragraph 7.
Države članice imajo pravico zavrniti premestitev prosilca, samo kadar obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi, da ga štejejo kot grožnjo za svojo nacionalno varnost ali za javni red ali če obstajajo resni razlogi za uporabo izključitvenih določb iz členov 12 in 17 Direktive 2011/95/EU.
Member States shall, at regular intervals, and at least every three months, indicate the number of applicants who can be relocated swiftly to their territory and any other relevant information.
Države članice lahko določijo, da po izmenjavi vseh relevantnih informacij za izvajanje vseh vidikov postopka premestitve iz tega člena v Italiji in v Grčiji imenujejo uradnike za zvezo.
Based on this information, Italy and Greece shall, with the assistance of EASO and, where applicable, of Member States' liaison officers referred to in paragraph 8 of this Article, identify the individual applicants who could be relocated to the other Member States and, as soon as possible, submit all relevant information to the contact points of those Member States.
Države članice v skladu s pravnim redom EU v celoti izpolnjujejo svoje obveznosti.