natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It appears that the green electricity privilege was slightly higher than the EEG-surcharge in 2012, but lower than the surcharges in 2013 and 2014.
Nemčija zagotovi, da se ta sklep izvede v štirih mesecih po datumu priglasitve tega sklepa z vračilom dodeljene nezdružljive pomoči.
It also appears that the green electricity privilege was lower than the advantage included in some of the feed-in tariffs (after deduction of the market price), for instance for solar power, but higher than the advantage included in other feed-in tariffs, for instance wind power.
Če Nemčija izterja le predhodne zneske iz odstavka 4 Priloge III, ki jih je treba vrniti, (Nemčija) zagotovi, da se korekcijski mehanizem iz odstavka 4 Priloge III izvede v enem letu po datumu priglasitve tega sklepa.
But even if the privilege may to some extent understate the actual magnitude of discrimination, it must be borne in mind that the amounts of guarantees of origin overstate the magnitude of imports.
Člen 8
Therefore, the Commission's view is that the method used by Germany (described in recitals 238 et seq.) is appropriate.
Nemčija v dveh mesecih od datuma priglasitve tega sklepa predloži naslednje informacije:
The advantage arising from the green electricity privilege, taken in conjunction with the figures on imported guarantees of origin, can be viewed as a reasonable proxy for the extent to which imported EEG electricity was discriminated against under the EEG-Act 2012.
seznam upravičencev, ki so prejeli pomoč iz člena 3(1) in (2), in skupni znesek prejete pomoči vsakega upravičenca iz te sheme;
Using the values for eligible EEG electricity imports set out in recital 237 and the values for the green electricity privilege set out in recital 241, the amount to be reinvested equals EUR 50 million [116].
skupni predhodni znesek, ki ga je treba vrniti (glavnica in obresti), ki ga mora vrniti vsak upravičenec;
Hence, the Commission views Germany's commitment to investing EUR 50 million (see recital 19) in interconnectors and European energy projects as remedying the historical potential discrimination under Articles 30 and 110 of the Treaty.
podroben opis že sprejetih ali načrtovanih ukrepov za uskladitev s tem sklepom, vključno z zavezo iz Priloge I;
AUTHENTIC LANGUAGE
dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da je bilo upravičencem naročeno, naj vrnejo pomoč, in da je zaveza iz Priloge I izpolnjena.
As mentioned under Section 1 of this Decision, Germany has waived its right to have the decision adopted in German.
Prav tako predloži podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih za vračilo, ki so jih upravičenci že vrnili.
The authentic language will therefore be English.
Člen 9
CONCLUSION AND RECOVERY
Nemčija se je zavezala, da bo ponovno vložila 50 milijonov EUR v povezovalne vode in evropske energetske projekte.
Given that the historic violation of Articles 30 and 110 of the Treaty by the EEG surcharge has been remedied, the Commission concludes that the support for EEG electricity producers, which was found to be compatible in recitals 187 and 200 of the Opening Decision, is also compliant with the internal market in so far as its financing mechanism is concerned.
Nemčija Komisijo obvešča o izvajanju te zaveze.
The Commission concludes that Germany has unlawfully implemented the aid for the support of EEG electricity production and for energy-intensive undertakings in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Člen 10
The aid should be recovered to the extent that it is incompatible with the internal market.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo.
Recovery should only cover the reductions from the EEG-surcharge granted in respect of the years 2013 and 2014 (hereinafter ‘the years concerned’).
V Bruslju, 25. novembra 2014
The recoverable amounts should be limited, for each of the years concerned, to the difference between the compatible amount for that year, as determined according to recitals 251, 252 and 253, and the amount of EEG-surcharge that was actually paid by the beneficiary in the year concerned.
Za Komisijo
The amount of EEG-surcharge that was actually paid by the beneficiary in the year concerned is in principle obtained by applying the reduced surcharge for that year to the beneficiary's electricity consumption in that same year.
Članica Komisije
However, in order to speed up the recovery, and as the consumption data for the years concerned is not yet available for all undertakings concerned by recovery, Germany will, as a first step, use the electricity consumption that was submitted in the applications to calculate a preliminary recovery amount, to be recovered immediately.
UL C 37, 7.2.2014, str. 73, in UL C 250, 1.8.2014, str. 15.
Germany will, as a second step, apply the actual consumption data of the years concerned in order to determine the final recovery amounts and take the necessary steps to ensure recovery or repayment on the basis of those final amounts (this second step in the recovery process is referred to as the ‘correction mechanism’).
Glej opombo 1.
The first step in determining the compatible amount lies in the application of Section 3.7.2 of the 2014 Guidelines.
Uredba št. 1 o določitvi jezikov, ki se uporabljajo v Evropski gospodarski skupnosti (UL L 17, 6.10.1958, str. 385).
The undertaking which benefited from the reduction must belong to the sectors listed in Annex 3 to the 2014 Guidelines (point 185 of the 2014 Guidelines) or, failing this, the undertaking must have an electro-intensity of at least 20 % and belong to a sector with a trade intensity of at least 4 % at Union level, even if it does not belong to a sector listed in Annex 3 to the 2014 Guidelines (point 186 of the 2014 Guidelines).
Zadeva o državni pomoči SA.38632 (2014/N) – Nemčija: EEG 2014 – Reform of the Renewable Energy Law (Reforma zakona o energiji iz obnovljivih virov, še ni objavljena v Uradnem listu).
For the application of point 186 of the 2014 Guidelines, as explained in recital 202, the data submitted in the applications made in respect of the years concerned may be used.
Omejitev se dodeli tudi prevoznikom v železniškem prometu.
Moreover, if the undertaking is eligible on the basis of recital 251, the undertaking must pay at least 15 % of the additional costs without reduction (point 188 of the 2014 Guidelines).
Ta omejitev se v okviru tega sklepa ne proučuje.
However, the payable amount can be limited at undertaking level to 4 % of the gross value added of the undertaking concerned.
UL C 200, 28.6.2014, str. 1.
Moreover, for undertakings having an electro-intensity of at least 20 %, the payable amount can be limited to 0,5 % of the gross value added of the undertaking concerned (point 189 of the 2014 Guidelines).
Zadevi T-244/93 in T-486/93, TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:1995; točka 160.
For the application of point 189 of the 2014 Guidelines, as explained in recital 202, the data submitted in the applications made in respect of the years concerned may be used.
V skladu s členom 11 izvedbene uredbe AusglMechV lahko agencija BNetzA sprejme uredbe v dogovoru z Zveznim ministrstvom za okolje, ohranjanje narave in jedrsko varnost (zdaj Zvezno ministrstvo za okolje, ohranjanje narave, gradnjo in jedrsko varnost) in Zveznim ministrstvom za gospodarske zadeve in tehnologijo (zdaj Zvezno ministrstvo za gospodarske zadeve in energijo).
If the undertaking is not eligible on the basis of recital 251, the payable amount is, according to Section 3.7.2 of the 2014 Guidelines, in principle equivalent to the EEG-surcharge without reduction, subject to the transit rule in point 197 of the 2014 Guidelines.
Direktiva 2009/28/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o spodbujanju uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov, spremembi in poznejši razveljavitvi direktiv 2001/77/ES in 2003/30/ES (UL L 140, 5.6.2009, str. 16).
For 2014, the compatible amount should not exceed 150 % of the surcharge that was actually paid in 2013 (that is to say, the previous year).
Zadeva C-677/11, Doux Élevage, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348.
As explained in recital 250, the surcharge that was actually paid in 2013 and 2014 may, for the purpose of determining the preliminary recovery amount, be based on electricity consumption data included in the undertaking's application for the reduction in 2013 and 2014.
UL C 164, 10.7.2002, str. 5.
For the purpose of the correction mechanism, the actual electricity consumption data for 2013 and 2014 will be used once it is available.
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
If the payable amount determined on the basis of recitals 251, 252 and 253 is not higher than the amount that was actually paid by the beneficiary in either of the years concerned, there will be no recovery.
Zadeva C-206/06, Essent Netwerk Noord, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413.
Where the total amount of aid received by a beneficiary is less than EUR 200000 and where the aid meets all the other criteria of either Commission Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 [117] or Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 [118], such aid should be deemed not to constitute State aid in the sense of Article 107(1) of the Treaty, and should therefore not be subject to recovery.
Zadeva C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851.
Where the total amount of aid received by a beneficiary is more than EUR 200000, of which an amount of less than EUR 200000 has to be recovered, Regulations (EC) No 1998/2006 and (EU) No 1407/2013 do not apply, because the aid concerns the same eligible costs and cumulation is therefore excluded (Article 5(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 and Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006).
Zadeva C-573/12, Ålands Vindkraft, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2037.
Such amounts should therefore have to be recovered.
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, točke 87 do 93.
The Commission has further examined whether there are any obstacles to recovery pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
Merila iz sodbe v zadevi Altmark je Sodišče določilo, da bi pojasnilo, v kakšnih okoliščinah nadomestilo, ki ga javni organ zagotovi za izvajanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, izpolnjuje pogoje za državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe.
As described in recital 172, some interested parties have argued that the adjustment in 2013 and 2014 should be as small as possible in order to safeguard the beneficiaries' legitimate expectations, and that no recovery should take place.
Nemčija je to trditev podprla s poročilom Sveta evropskih regulatorjev na področju energije z dne 25. junija 2013 z naslovom „Status Review of Renewable and Energy Efficiency Support Schemes in Europe“ (Pregled stanja programov podpore za obnovljive vire energije in energetsko učinkovitost v Evropi) (zlasti preglednicami na straneh 18 do 20).
However, for the reasons stated in recitals 146 et seq., the Commission's decision in case NN 27/00 cannot give rise to legitimate expectations on the part of the beneficiaries, given that the EEG-Act 2012 is different from the EEG-Act 2000 and was adopted more than 10 years later and that in particular the BesAR did not exist in the EEG-Act 2000,
Zadeva C-387/92, Banco Exterior de España, ECLI:EU:C:1994:100, točka 13; zadeva C-156/98, Nemčija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:2000:467, točka 25; zadeva C-6/97, Italija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1999:251, točka 15; zadeva C-172/03, Heiser, ECLI:EU:C:2005:130, točka 36; zadeva C-126/01, GEMO SA, ECLI:EU:C:2003:622, točke 28 do 31 o brezplačnem zbiranju in odlaganju odpadkov.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Zadeva C-173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, točka 36.
Article 1
Glej tudi zadevo T-55/99, CETM proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2000:223, točka 85.
Article 3
Zadeva T-177/10, Alcoa Trasformazioni proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, točka 85.
Where the State aid was granted to an undertaking which does not belong to a sector listed in Annex 3 to the 2014 Guidelines but had an electro-intensity of at least 20 % in 2012 and belonged, in that year, to a sector with a trade intensity of at least 4 % at Union level, it is compatible with the internal market if the undertaking paid at least 15 % of the additional costs faced by electricity suppliers due to obligations to buy renewable energy which were subsequently passed on to electricity consumers.
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, točka 87.
Where the State aid was granted to an undertaking eligible for compatible State aid on the basis of the second or third subparagraph, but the amount of the EEG-surcharge paid by that undertaking did not reach the level required by those subparagraphs, the following parts of the aid are compatible:
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, točke 89 do 93.
for 2013, the part of the aid which exceeds 125 % of the surcharge that the undertaking actually paid in 2013;
Direktiva 2009/72/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o skupnih pravilih notranjega trga z električno energijo in o razveljavitvi Direktive 2003/54/ES (UL L 211, 14.8.2009, str. 55).
for 2014, the part of the aid which exceeds 150 % of the surcharge that the undertaking actually paid in 2013.
Združene zadeve 67/85, 68/85 in 70/85, Kwekerij Gebroeders van der Kooy in drugi, ECLI:EU:C:1988:38; zadeva T-157/01, Danske Busvognmænd proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2004:76; združene zadeve T-254/00, T-270/00 in T-277/00, Hotel Cipriani in drugi proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2008:537.
Where the State aid was granted to an undertaking not eligible for compatible State aid on the basis of the second or third subparagraph, and where the undertaking paid less than 20 % of the additional costs of the surcharge without reduction, the following parts of the aid are compatible:
Združene zadeve 67/85, 68/85 in 70/85, Kwekerij Gebroeders van der Kooy in drugi, ECLI:EU:C:1988:38, točka 30.
Individual aid granted on the basis of the aid schemes referred to in Articles 1 and 3 does not constitute aid if, at the time it was granted, it fulfilled the conditions laid down by the regulation adopted pursuant to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 [119] which was applicable at the time the aid was granted.Article 5
Zadeva C-71/09 P, Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“ in drugi proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368.
Individual aid granted on the basis of the aid schemes referred to in Articles 1 and 3 which, at the time it was granted, fulfilled the conditions laid down by the regulation adopted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 994/98, or by any approved aid scheme, is compatible with the internal market, up to maximum aid intensities applicable to that type of aid.
Zadeva C-71/09 P, Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“ in drugi proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368, točka 92.
Article 6
Zadeva C-71/09 P, Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“ in drugi proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368, točka 95.
Germany shall recover the incompatible aid referred to in Article 3(2) from the beneficiaries according to the method described in Annex III.
Zadeva C-71/09 P, Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“ in drugi proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368, točka 96.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
Zadeva T-295/12, Nemčija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2014:675, točka 144; zadeva T-309/12, Zweckverband Tierkörperbeseitigung proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2014:676, točka 261.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [120].
Zadeva T-226/09, British Telecommunications in drugi proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2013:466, točka 71.
Germany shall cancel all outstanding payments of aid under the scheme referred to in Article 3(2) with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Glej sklepne ugotovitve generalnega pravobranilca Watheleta, zadeva C-242/13, Commerz Nederland, ECLI:EU:C:2014:308, točka 75 in naslednje točke.
Article 7
Zadeva C-78/76, Steinike & Weinlig proti Nemčiji, ECLI:EU:C:1977:52, točka 21.
Recovery of the incompatible aid referred to in Article 3(2) shall be immediate and effective.
Zadeva C-677/11, Doux Élevage, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, točka 35.
Germany shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision by recovering the incompatible aid granted.
Zadeva C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, točke 16 do 20.
Where Germany recovers only the preliminary recovery amounts set out in paragraph 4 of Annex III, Germany shall ensure that the correction mechanism described in paragraph 4 of Annex III is implemented within one year following the date of notification of this Decision.
Zadeva C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, točka 21.
Article 8
Zadeva C-78/76, Steinike & Weinlig proti Nemčiji, ECLI:EU:C:1977:52, točka 21; zadeva C-173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, EU:C:1974:71, točka 16; zadeva 259/85, Francija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1987:478, točka 23; zadeva C-206/06, Essent Netwerk Noord, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413, točka 66.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Germany shall submit the following information:
Zadeva C-173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, točka 16.
the list of beneficiaries that have received aid referred to in Article 3(1) and (2) and the total amount of aid received by each of them under the scheme;
Zadeva T-139/09, Francija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2012:496, točki 63 in 64.
the total preliminary recovery amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
Zadeva C-206/06, Essent Netwerk Noord, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413, točka 70; zadeva C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, točka 20.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision, including the commitment set out in Annex I;
Zadeva C-72/91, Sloman Neptun proti Bodo Ziesemer, ECLI:EU:C:1993:97, točka 19.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid and that the commitment set out in Annex I is complied with.
Zadeva C-72/91, Sloman Neptun proti Bodo Ziesemer, ECLI:EU:C:1993:97.
Germany shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 3(2) has been completed and the commitment set out in Annex I is fully implemented.
Zadeva C-72/91, Sloman Neptun proti Bodo Ziesemer, ECLI:EU:C:1993:97, točka 21.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Oberlandesgericht Hamm, sodba z dne 14. maja 2013, št. 19 U 180/12.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Glej zadevo C-78/76, Steinike & Weinlig proti Nemčiji, ECLI:EU:C:1977:52, točka 21.
Article 9
Zadeva C-275/13, Elcogás, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2314, točka 29.
Germany has committed to reinvest EUR 50 million in interconnectors and in European energy projects.
Zadeva C-399/10 P, Bouygues in drugi proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:2013:175, točka 103.
Germany shall keep the Commission informed of the implementation of this commitment.
Zadeva C-399/10 P, Bouygues in drugi proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:2013:175, točka 104.
Article 10
Zadeva C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, točka 19; zadeva C-275/13, Elcogás, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2314, točka 24.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Zadeva C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, točka 25; zadeva C-173/73, Italija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, točka 35.
Done at Brussels, 25 November 2014.
Zadeva C-677/11, Doux Élevage, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, točka 32.
For the Commission
Zadeva C-677/11, Doux Élevage, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, točka 36.
Member of the Commission
Zadeva C-677/11, Doux Élevage, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, točka 38.
OJ C 37, 7.2.2014, p. 73, and OJ C 250, 1.8.2014, p. 15.
Glej opombo 69.
Cf. footnote 1.
Zadeva C-279/08 P, Komisija proti Nizozemski, ECLI:EU:C:2011:551, točke 102 do 113.
Regulation No 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community (OJ Series I, Volume 1952-1958, p. 59).
Glej opombo 21.
Gesetz für den Vorrang Erneuerbarer Energien (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz — EEG), as amended by Gesetz zur Neuregelung des Rechtsrahmens für die Förderung der Stromerzeugung aus erneuerbaren Energien, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1634, and by Gesetz zur Änderung des Rechtsrahmens für Strom aus solarer Strahlungsenergie und zu weiteren Änderungen im Recht der erneuerbaren Energien vom 17.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
August 2012, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1754.
Sodba v zadevi Nemčija in drugi proti Kronofrance, C-75/05 in C-80/05, ECLI:EU:C:2008:482, točka 61 in navedena sodna praksa.
Juli 2014, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1066.
Zainteresirane strani so navedle naslednjo sodno prakso: zadeva C-260/91, Diversinte, ECLI:EU:C:1993:136, točka 9; zadeva C-63/83, Regina proti Kirk, ECLI:EU:C:1984:255, točka 21 in naslednje točke; zadeva C-1/73, Westzucker, ECLI:EU:C:1973:78, točka 5; zadeva C-295/02, Gerken, ECLI:EU:C:2004:400, točka 47 in naslednje točke; zadeva C-420/06, Jager, ECLI:EU:C:2008:152, točka 59 in naslednje točke; zadeva C-189/02 P, Dansk Rørindustri in drugi proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:2005:408, točka 217.
State aid case SA.38632 (2014/N) — Germany: EEG 2014 — Reform of the Renewable Energy Law (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Zadeva C-334/07 Ρ, Komisija proti Freistaat Sachsen, ECLI:EU:C:2008:709, točka 43; zadeva T-176/01, Ferrière Nord proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2004:336, točka 139.
Juli 2009, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 2101, as amended by Article 2 of Gesetz vom 17.
Zadeva C-68/69, Bundesknappschaft proti Brock, ECLI:EU:C:1970:24, točka 6; zadeva 1/73 Westzucker GmbH proti Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Zucker, ECLI:EU:C:1973:78, točka 5; zadeva 143/73, SOPAD proti FORMA in drugi, ECLI:EU:C:1973:145, točka 8; zadeva C-96/77, Bauche, ECLI:EU:C:1978:26, točka 48; zadeva C-125/77, KoninklijkeScholten-Honig NV in drugi proti Floofdproduktschaap voor Akkerbouwprodukten, ECLI:EU:C:1978:187, točka 37; zadeva C-40/79, Ρ proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1981:32, točka 12; zadeva C-270/84, Licata proti ESC, ECLI:EU:C:1986:304, točka 31; zadeva C-60/98 Butterfly Music proti CEDEM, ECLI:EU:C:1999:333, točka 24; zadeva C-334/07 Ρ, Komisija proti Freistaat Sachsen, ECLI:EU:C:2008:709, točka 53; zadeva T-404/05 Grčija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2008:510, točka 77.
Februar 2010, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 134, as amended by the Zweite Verordnung zur Änderung der Ausgleichsmechanismus-Ausführungsverordnung vom 19.
Zadeva C-169/95, Španija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:1997:10, točke 51 do 54; združeni zadevi T-116/01 in T-118/01, P&O European Ferries (Vizcaya) SA proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:T:2003:217, točka 205.
Februar 2013, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 310.
Združeni zadevi C-465/09 Ρ do C-470/09 Ρ, Diputación Foral de Vizcaya in drugi proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:2011:372, točki 125 in 128.
The cap is also granted to railway undertakings.
Direktiva Sveta 2003/96/ES z dne 27. oktobra 2003 o prestrukturiranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije (UL L 283, 31.10.2003, str. 51).
This cap is not examined in the framework of this decision.
Zadeva C-261/01, Van Calster, ECLI:EU:C:2003:571, točka 49; zadeva C-333/07, Société Régie Networks, ECLI:EU:C:2008:764, točka 89.
OJ C 200, 28.6.2014, p. 1.
Glej opombo 75.
Cases T-244/93 and T-486/93, TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:1995; 160.
Zadeva C-310/99, Italija proti Komisiji, ECLI:EU:C:2002:143, točka 52.
According to § 11 AusglMechV, the BNetzA can enact regulations in agreement with the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (now Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Construction and Nuclear Safety) and the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (now Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy).
UL C 188, 20.6.2014, str. 4.