natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Taking into account information received recently as regards the toxicity of zearalenone in feed for cats and dogs, it is appropriate to establish a guideline level for zearalenone in feed for cat and dogs to provide guarantees as regards animal health for cat and dogs, awaiting an updated risk assessment, to be performed by EFSA, on the possible animal health risks as the consequence of the presence of zearalenone in feed.
Ob upoštevanju nedavno prejetih informacij v zvezi s toksičnostjo zearalenona v krmi za mačke in pse, je primerno do posodobitve ocene tveganja Evropske agencije za varnost hrane priporočiti orientacijsko vrednost za zearalenon v krmi za mačke in pse, da se zagotovi jamstvo glede zdravja mačk in psov zaradi prisotnosti zearalenona v krmi.
Taking into account information received recently as regards the toxicity of ochratoxin A in feed for cats and dogs and the EFSA opinion on ochratoxin A in feed [3], it is appropriate to establish a guideline level for ochratoxin A in feed for cats and dogs to provide guarantees as regards animal health for cats and dogs.
Ob upoštevanju nedavno prejetih informacij glede toksičnosti ohratoksina A v krmi za mačke in pse in mnenja Evropske agencije za varnost hrane o ohratoksinu A v krmi [3] je primerno priporočiti orientacijsko vrednost ohratoksina A v krmi za mačke in pse, da se zagotovi jamstvo glede zdravja mačk in psov.
To maintain the readability of the provisions in the Recommendation, it is appropriate to replace the Annex to Recommendation by a new Annex.
Za ohranitev berljivosti določb v Priporočilu je Prilogo k Priporočilu primerno nadomestiti z novo prilogo –
The Annex to Recommendation 2006/576/EC is replaced by Annex to this Recommendation.
Priloga k Priporočilu 2006/576/ES se nadomesti s Prilogo k temu priporočilu.
Commission Recommendation 2006/576/EC of 17 August 2006 on the presence of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, ochratoxin A, T-2 and HT-2 and fumonisins in products intended for animal feeding (OJ L 229, 23.8.2006, p. 7).
Priporočilo Komisije 2006/576/ES z dne 17. avgusta 2006 o prisotnosti deoksinivalenola, zearalenona, ohratoksina A, toksinov T-2 in HT-2 ter fumonizinov v proizvodih, namenjenih za krmljenje živali (UL L 229, 23.8.2006, str. 7).
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain on a request from the Commission related to Deoxynivalenol (DON) as undesirable substance in animal feed http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/73
Mnenje znanstvenega odbora za onesnaževala v prehranski verigi na zahtevo Komisije v zvezi z deoksinivalenolom (DON) kot neželeno snovjo v živalski krmi, http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/73.
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in Food Chain on a request from the Commission related to ochratoxin A (OTA) as undesirable substance in animal feed http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/101
Mnenje znanstvenega odbora za onesnaževala v prehranski verigi na zahtevo Komisije v zvezi z ohratoksinom A (OTA) kot neželeno snovjo v živalski krmi, http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/101.
Guidance value in mg/kg (ppm) relative to a feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12 %
Orientacijska vrednost v mg/kg (ppm) za krmo z 12-odstotno vsebnostjo vlage
Cereals and cereal products [2] with the exception of maize by-products
žita in izdelki iz žit [2], razen stranskih proizvodov iz koruze
Maize by-products
stranski proizvodi iz koruze
Compound feed with the exception of
Krmne mešanice, razen
compound feed for pigs
krmnih mešanic za prašiče
compound feed for calves (< 4 months), lambs, kids and dogs
krmnih mešanic za teleta (< 4 mesece), jagnjeta, kozličke in pse
Compound feed for:
Krmne mešanice za:
piglets, gilts (young sows), puppies, kittens, dogs and cats for reproduction
pujske, mladice (mlade svinje), pse in mačke za razmnoževanje ter njihove mladiče
adult dogs and cats other than for reproduction
odrasle pse in mačke, razen za razmnoževanje
sows and fattening pigs
svinje in prašiče pitance
calves, dairy cattle, sheep (including lamb) and goats (including kids)
teleta, krave molznice, ovce (vključno z jagnjeti) in koze (vključno s kozlički)
Cereals and cereal products [2]
žita in žitni proizvodi [2]
pigs
prašiče
poultry
perutnino
cats and dogs
mačke in pse
maize and maize products [3]
koruza in proizvodi na osnovi koruze [3]
pigs, horses (Equidae), rabbits and pet animals
prašiče, konje (Equidae), kunce in hišne živali
poultry, calves (< 4 months), lambs and kids
perutnino, teleta (< 4 mesece), jagnjeta in kozličke
adult ruminants (> 4 months) and mink
odrasle prežvekovalce (> 4 mesece) in kune
T-2 + HT-2 toxin
Toksina T-2 in HT-2
Particular attention has to be paid to cereals and cereals products fed directly to the animals that their use in a daily ration should not lead to the animal being exposed to a higher level of these mycotoxins than the corresponding levels of exposure where only the complete feedingstuffs are used in a daily ration.
Posebna pozornost je potrebna pri žitih in izdelkih iz žit, ki se neposredno krmijo živalim, da s prisotnostjo v dnevnem obroku ne povzročijo večje stopnje izpostavljenosti omenjenim mikotoksinom kot pri primerljivi stopnji izpostavljenosti, če je dnevni obrok le iz popolne krmne mešanice.
The term ‘Cereals and cereal products’ includes not only the feed materials listed under heading 1 ‘Cereal grains and products derived thereof’ of the list of feed materials referred to in part C of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 of 16 January 2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials (OJ L 29, 30.1.2013, p.
Pojem „žita in izdelki iz žit“ zajema poleg posamičnih krmil iz poglavja 1 „Žitna zrna in iz njih pridobljeni proizvodi“ s seznama posamičnih krmil iz dela C Priloge k Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 68/2013 z dne 16. januarja 2013 o katalogu posamičnih krmil (UL L 29, 30.1.2013, str. 1) tudi druga posamična krmila, pridobljena iz žit, zlasti suho ter grobo žitno krmo.
1) but also other feed materials derived from cereals in particular cereal forages and roughages.
Pojem „koruza in izdelki iz koruze“ zajema poleg posamičnih krmil iz poglavja 1 „Žitna zrna in iz njih pridobljeni proizvodi“ s seznama posamičnih krmil iz dela C Priloge k Uredbi (EU) št. 68/2013 tudi druga posamična krmila, pridobljena iz koruze, zlasti suho ter grobo koruzno krmo.
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2016/1374
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2016/1374
regarding the rule of law in Poland
v zvezi z načelom pravne države na Poljskem
The European Union is founded on a common set of values enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union, which include the respect for the rule of law.
Evropska unija temelji na skupnih vrednotah, zapisanih v členu 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), med katerimi je tudi spoštovanje pravne države.
The Commission, beyond its task to ensure the respect of EU law, is also responsible, together with the European Parliament, the Member States and the Council, for guaranteeing the common values of the Union.
Poleg zagotavljanja spoštovanja prava EU je Komisija skupaj z Evropskim parlamentom, državami članicami in Svetom odgovorna tudi za varovanje skupnih vrednot Unije.
For this reason the Commission, taking account of its responsibilities under the Treaties, adopted on 11 March 2014 a Communication ‘A new EU Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law’ [1].
Zato je ob upoštevanju svojih pristojnosti v skladu s Pogodbama 11. marca 2014 sprejela sporočilo z naslovom „Novi okvir EU za krepitev načela pravne države“ [1].
This Rule of Law Framework sets out how the Commission will react should clear indications of a threat to the rule of law emerge in a Member State of the Union and explains the principles which the rule of law entails.
Ta okvir določa, kako se bo Komisija odzvala, če bi se pokazali jasni znaki nevarnosti za načelo pravne države v državi članici Unije, in pojasnjuje načela, ki izhajajo iz načela pravne države.
The Rule of Law Framework provides guidance for a dialogue between the Commission and the Member State concerned to prevent the escalation of systemic threats to the rule of law.
Okvir za krepitev pravne države določa smernice za dialog med Komisijo in zadevno državo članico, da se prepreči povečanje sistemskih nevarnosti za načelo pravne države.
The purpose of this dialogue is to enable the Commission to find a solution with the Member State concerned in order to prevent the emergence of a systemic threat to the rule of law that could develop into a ‘clear risk of a serious breach’ which would potentially trigger the use of the ‘Article 7 TEU Procedure’.
Dialog naj bi Komisiji omogočil poiskati rešitev z zadevno državo članico, da se preprečijo nove sistemske nevarnosti za pravno državo, ki bi lahko privedle do „očitnega tveganja hujše kršitve“, kar bi lahko sprožilo uporabo postopka iz člena 7 PEU.
Where there are clear indications of a systemic threat to the rule of law in a Member State, the Commission can initiate a dialogue with that Member State under the Rule of Law Framework.
Če obstajajo jasni znaki sistemske nevarnosti za načelo pravne države v državi članici, lahko Komisija v skladu z okvirom za krepitev pravne države z zadevno državo članico začne dialog.
Case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the European Court of Human Rights, as well as documents drawn up by the Council of Europe, building notably on the expertise of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (‘Venice Commission’), provides a non-exhaustive list of these principles and hence defines the core meaning of the rule of law as a common value of the Union in accordance with Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
Sodna praksa Sodišča Evropske unije in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice ter dokumenti Sveta Evrope, oblikovani predvsem na podlagi strokovnega mnenja Evropske komisije za demokracijo skozi pravo („Beneške komisije“), zagotavljajo neizčrpen seznam navedenih načel in tako opredeljujejo bistveni pomen načela pravne države kot skupne vrednote Unije v skladu s členom 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Those principles include legality, which implies a transparent, accountable, democratic and pluralistic process for enacting laws; legal certainty; prohibition of arbitrariness of the executive powers; independent and impartial courts; effective judicial review including respect for fundamental rights; and equality before the law [2].
Ta načela so zakonitost, ki vključuje pregleden, odgovoren, demokratičen in pluralističen postopek sprejemanja zakonov; pravna varnost; prepoved samovoljnega ravnanja izvršilnih oblasti; neodvisno in nepristransko sodišče; učinkovito sodno varstvo, vključno s spoštovanjem temeljnih pravic, in enakost pred zakonom [2].
In addition to upholding those principles and values, State institutions also have the duty of loyal cooperation.
Poleg varovanja teh načel in vrednot je dolžnost državnih institucij tudi, da lojalno sodelujejo.
The Framework is to be activated in situations where the authorities of a Member State are taking measures or are tolerating situations which are likely to systematically and adversely affect the integrity, stability or the proper functioning of the institutions and the safeguard mechanisms established at national level to secure the rule of law [3].
Okvir se bo uporabil v primerih, ko organi države članice sprejmejo ukrepe ali dopuščajo okoliščine, ki lahko sistematično in negativno vplivajo na celovitost, stabilnost ali pravilno delovanje institucij in zaščitnih mehanizmov, vzpostavljenih na nacionalni ravni za varstvo načela pravne države [3].
The purpose is to address threats to the rule of law which are of a systemic nature [4].
Cilj je obravnavanje nevarnosti za načelo pravne države, ki so sistemske narave [4].
The political, institutional and/or legal order of a Member State as such, its constitutional structure, separation of powers, the independence or impartiality of the judiciary, or its system of judicial review including constitutional justice where it exists, must be threatened [5].
Politični, institucionalni in/ali pravni red države članice, njena ustavna ureditev, delitev oblasti, neodvisnost ali nepristranskost sodstva ali njen sistem sodnega varstva, vključno z ustavnim sodstvom, če obstaja, morajo biti ogroženi [5].
The Framework is to be activated in situations when national ‘rule of law safeguards’ do not seem capable of effectively addressing those threats.
Okvir se bo uporabil v primerih, kadar nacionalni „zaščitni ukrepi za varstvo načela pravne države“ takšnih nevarnosti ne obravnavajo učinkovito.
The Rule of Law Framework has three stages.
Okvir za krepitev pravne države je trifazni postopek.
In a first stage (‘Commission assessment’) the Commission collects and examines all the relevant information and assesses whether there are clear indications of a systemic threat to the rule of law.
V prvi fazi („ocena Komisije“) Komisija zbere in preuči vse pomembne informacije ter oceni, ali obstajajo očitni znaki sistemske nevarnosti za načelo pravne države.
If, as a result of this preliminary assessment, the Commission believes that there is a systemic threat to the rule of law, it will initiate a dialogue with the Member State concerned, by sending a ‘rule of law opinion’, substantiating its concerns and giving the Member State concerned the possibility to respond.
Če na podlagi predhodne ocene Komisija meni, da obstaja sistemska nevarnost za načelo pravne države, bo začela dialog z zadevno državo članico, in sicer tako, da ji bo poslala „mnenje v zvezi z načelom pravne države“, utemeljila razloge za svoje pomisleke ter dala zadevni državi članici možnost odgovora.
The opinion could be the result of an exchange of correspondence and meetings with the relevant authorities and be followed by further exchanges.
Mnenje je lahko rezultat izmenjave dopisov in srečanj z zadevnimi organi in mu lahko sledijo nadaljnje izmenjave.
In a second stage (‘Commission Recommendation’), if the matter has not been satisfactorily resolved, the Commission can issue a ‘rule of law recommendation’ addressed to the Member State.
V drugi fazi postopka („priporočilo Komisije“) Komisija, če zadeva še ni bila zadovoljivo rešena, lahko izda „priporočilo v zvezi z načelom pravne države“, naslovljeno na zadevno državo članico.
In such a case, the Commission indicates the reasons for its concerns and recommends that the Member State solves the problems identified within a fixed time limit, and informs the Commission of the steps taken to that effect.
V tem primeru Komisija jasno navede razloge za svoje pomisleke in priporoči, naj država članica v določenem časovnem obdobju reši ugotovljene težave ter Komisijo obvesti o ukrepih, sprejetih v ta namen.
In a third stage (‘Follow-up to the Commission Recommendation’), the Commission monitors the follow-up given by the Member State to the recommendation.
V tretji fazi („spremljanje izvajanja priporočila“) Komisija spremlja, kako država članica ukrepa po prejetju priporočila.
The entire process is based on a continuous dialogue between the Commission and the Member State concerned.
Celoten proces temelji na stalnem dialogu med Komisijo in zadevno državo članico.
If there is no satisfactory follow-up within the time limit set, resort can be had to the ‘Article 7 TEU Procedure’; the procedure can be triggered by a reasoned proposal by one third of the Member States, by the European Parliament or by the Commission.
Če država članica v določenem roku ne ukrepa zadovoljivo, se lahko uporabi postopek iz člena 7 PEU; postopek se lahko sproži na podlagi obrazloženega predloga tretjine držav članic, Evropskega parlamenta ali Komisije.
In November 2015, the Commission became aware of an ongoing dispute in Poland concerning in particular the composition of the Constitutional Tribunal, as well as the shortening of the mandates of its current President and Vice-President.
Novembra 2015 je Komisija izvedela za spor, ki poteka na Poljskem in zlasti zadeva sestavo ustavnega sodišča ter skrajšanje mandatov sedanjega predsednika in podpredsednika ustavnega sodišča.
The Constitutional Tribunal rendered two judgments on this matter, on 3 and 9 December 2015.
Ustavno sodišče je v zvezi s tem izreklo dve sodbi, in sicer 3. in 9. decembra 2015.
On 22 December 2015, the Sejm adopted a law amending the law on the Constitutional Tribunal, which concerns the functioning of the Tribunal as well as the independence of its judges [6].
22. decembra 2015 je Sejm (poljski parlament) sprejel zakon o spremembi zakona o ustavnem sodišču, ki se nanaša na delovanje sodišča ter neodvisnost njegovih sodnikov [6].
In a letter of 23 December 2015, to the Polish Government [7], the Commission asked to be informed about the constitutional situation in Poland, including the steps envisaged by the Polish authorities with respect to the abovementioned two judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal.
V dopisu s 23. decembra 2015 [7] je Komisija poljsko vlado zaprosila, da jo obvešča o ustavnih razmerah na Poljskem, vključno z ukrepi, ki so jih poljski organi predvideli v zvezi z navedenima sodbama ustavnega sodišča.
As regards the amendments contained in the law adopted on 22 December 2015 on the Constitutional Tribunal, the Commission stated it would expect that this law is not finally adopted or at least not put into force until all questions regarding the impact of this law on the independence and the functioning of the Constitutional Tribunal have been fully and properly assessed.
V zvezi s spremembami iz zakona o ustavnem sodišču z 22. decembra 2015 je Komisija navedla, da pričakuje, da ta zakon ne bo dokončno sprejet ali vsaj ne začel veljati, dokler se ne opravi celovite in ustrezne ocene vseh pomislekov o vplivu tega zakona na neodvisnost in delovanje ustavnega sodišča.
The Commission also recommended to the Polish authorities to work closely with the Council of Europe's Venice Commission.
Komisija je poljskim organom prav tako priporočila, naj tesno sodelujejo z Beneško komisijo Sveta Evrope.
However, the Polish Parliament did not await this opinion before taking further steps, and the Law was published in the Official Journal and entered into force on 28 December 2015.
31. decembra 2015 je poljski senat sprejel „zakon o malih medijih“, ki ureja upravni odbor in nadzorni svet poljske javne radiotelevizije.
On 30 December 2015, the Commission wrote to the Polish Government [8] to seek additional information about the proposed reforms to the governance of Poland's Public State Broadcasters.
7. januarja 2016 je Komisija prejela odgovor poljske vlade [9] v zvezi z dopisom o zakonu o medijih, v katerem je ta zanikala kakršen koli škodljiv vpliv na pluralnost medijev.
On 31 December 2015, the Polish Senate adopted the ‘small media law’ concerning the management and supervisory boards of the Polish public television broadcaster and public radio broadcaster.
11. januarja je Komisija prejela odgovor poljske vlade glede reforme ustavnega sodišča [10].
On 7 January 2016, the Commission received a response from the Polish Government [9] on the letter on the media law denying any adverse impact on media pluralism.
Ta dva odgovora nista odpravila pomislekov Komisije.
On 11 January, the Commission received a response from the Polish Government on the Constitutional Tribunal reform [10].
13. januarja 2016 je kolegij komisarjev organiziral prvo orientacijsko razpravo, da bi ocenili razmere na Poljskem.
These responses did not remove existing concerns.
Komisija se je odločila, da v skladu z okvirom za krepitev pravne države preuči razmere in prvega podpredsednika Fransa Timmermansa pooblastila, naj začne dialog z institucijami Republike Poljske za razjasnitev teh vprašanj in opredelitev možnih rešitev.
On 13 January 2016, the College of Commissioners held a first orientation debate in order to assess the situation in Poland.
Istega dne je Komisija poljski vladi poslala dopis [11], v katerem jo je obvestila, da preučuje razmere v skladu z okvirom za krepitev pravne države in da želi začeti dialog z institucijami Republike Poljske, da bi razjasnili odprta vprašanja in opredelili možne rešitve.
The Commission decided to examine the situation under the Rule of Law Framework and mandated First Vice-President Timmermans to enter into a dialogue with the institutions of the Republic of Poland in order to clarify the issues at hand and identify possible solutions.
19. januarja 2016 je Komisija pisala poljski vladi [12] in ji ponudila strokovno pomoč ter predlagala razpravo o zadevah, povezanih z novim zakonom o medijih.
On the same day, the Commission wrote to the Polish Government [11] informing the Government that it was examining the situation under the Rule of Law Framework and wished to enter into a dialogue with the institutions of the Republic of Poland in order to clarify the issues at hand and identify possible solutions.
19. januarja 2016 je poljska vlada pisala Komisiji [13] in predstavila svoja stališča o sporu v zvezi z imenovanjem sodnikov, pri čemer se je med drugim sklicevala na ustavne običaje v zvezi z imenovanjem sodnikov.
On 19 January 2016 the Commission wrote to the Polish Government [12] offering to contribute expertise and discuss matters related to the new media law.
Poljska vlada je navedla več pozitivnih učinkov, ki naj bi bili rezultat spremembe zakona o ustavnem sodišču.
On 19 January 2016, the Polish Government wrote to the Commission [13] setting out its views on the dispute concerning the appointment of judges, referring, inter alia, to a constitutional custom relating to the appointment of judges.
Istega dne je Evropski parlament organiziral plenarno razpravo o razmerah na Poljskem.
The Polish Government set out a number of positive effects considered to result from the amendment to the Act on the Constitutional Tribunal.
1. februarja 2016 je Komisija pisala poljski vladi [14] in jo opozorila, da sodbi ustavnega sodišča o imenovanju sodnikov še vedno nista bili izvršeni.
On the same day the European Parliament held a plenary debate on the situation in Poland.
Prav tako je poudarila, da je treba spremembo zakona o ustavnem sodišču dodatno preučiti, zlasti „kombinirane učinke“ različnih uvedenih sprememb, in zahtevala podrobnejša pojasnila.
On 1 February 2016, the Commission wrote to the Polish Government [14] noting that the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal on the appointment of judges had still not been implemented.
V dopisu je zahtevala tudi informacije o drugih nedavno sprejetih zakonih, zlasti novem zakonu o javni upravi, zakonu o spremembi zakona o policiji in nekaterih drugih zakonov ter zakonu o javnem tožilstvu, in predvidenih zakonodajnih reformah, zlasti nadaljnjih reformah medijske zakonodaje.
The letter also underlined the need to further examine the amendment to the Act on the Constitutional Tribunal, in particular the ‘combined effect’ of the various changes made, requesting more detailed explanations.
29. februarja 2016 je poljska vlada pisala Komisiji [15] z dodatnimi pojasnili o mandatu predsednika ustavnega sodišča.
The letter also requested information about other laws which had been adopted recently, in particular the new Civil Service Act, the Act amending the law on the Police and certain other laws, as well as the Law on the Public Prosecution Office, and about legislative reforms which were being envisaged, notably further reforms of the media legislation.
V dopisu je pojasnila, da je sodišče v sodbi z 9. decembra 2015 razglasilo, da so začasne določbe zakona o spremembi, ki so predvidevale končanje mandata predsednika, neustavne in so tako izgubile svoj pravni učinek.
On 29 February 2016, the Polish Government wrote to the Commission [15] providing further clarifications on the mandate of the President of the Constitutional Tribunal.
Poleg tega je poljska vlada v dopisu zaprosila za pojasnila glede navedb Komisije, da zavezujoči in dokončni sodbi ustavnega sodišča še vedno nista bili izvršeni ter da so resolucije o imenovanju treh ustavnih sodnikov z 2. decembra 2015 v nasprotju s poznejšo sodbo sodišča.
As a result, the current President of the Tribunal would continue to exercise his mandate pursuant to the old legislative provisions until his mandate expired on 19 December 2016.
9. marca 2016 je ustavno sodišče razsodilo, da je zakon z 22. decembra 2015 neustaven.