natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, future decisions authorising the reimbursement in instalments should allow for a higher number of instalments in cases where the amounts concerned represent a high proportion of the Member State's Gross Domestic Product.
Zato bi morali prihodnji sklepi o odobritvi povračila v obrokih omogočati večje število obrokov, kadar zadevni zneski predstavljajo velik delež bruto domačega proizvoda države članice.
The Member State benefitting from a deferral decision should ensure that the deficiencies which have been the reasons for the deductions and which persist at the time of that decision are being remedied on the basis of an action plan, established in consultation with the Commission, with clear progress indicators.
Država članica, ki ji je bil odobren odlog, bi morala zagotoviti, da se pomanjkljivosti, zaradi katerih je prišlo do odbitkov in ki so v času navedenega sklepa še vedno prisotne, odpravijo na podlagi akcijskega načrta, ki je oblikovan po posvetovanju s Komisijo in vsebuje jasne kazalnike napredka.
If a Member State benefitting from such a deferral fails to remedy the deficiencies in accordance with the action plan and, thus, exposes the Union budget to additional financial risks, the Commission should be able to amend or repeal its decision deferring the date for the application of the deductions, taking into account the principle of proportionality.
Če država članica, ki ji je bil odobren tak odlog, pomanjkljivosti ne odpravi v skladu z akcijskim načrtom in tako proračun Unije izpostavlja dodatnemu finančnemu tveganju, lahko Komisija spremeni ali razveljavi sklep, s katerim je odložila datum uporabe odbitkov, pri čemer upošteva načelo sorazmernosti.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 908/2014 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on the Agricultural Funds,
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za kmetijska sklada –
The following paragraphs 8a and 8b are inserted in Article 34 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014:
V člen 34 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 908/2014 se vstavita naslednja odstavka 8a in 8b:
For Member States which are subject to financial assistance under Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002, Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 and the Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism, the Commission may, at the Member State's request and after consultation of the Committee on the Agricultural Funds, adopt an implementing decision deferring, for a period not exceeding 24 months from the date of its adoption, the execution of decisions adopted after 1 May 2015 pursuant to Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 (“deferral decision”).
Komisija lahko na zahtevo države članice in po posvetovanju z Odborom za kmetijska sklada za države članice, ki so upravičene do finančne pomoči v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002, Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 407/2010 in Pogodbo o ustanovitvi evropskega mehanizma za stabilnost, sprejme izvedbeni sklep, s katerim za obdobje, ki ni daljše od 24 mesecev od datuma njegovega sprejetja, odloži izvrševanje sklepov, sprejetih po 1. maju 2015 v skladu s členom 52 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o odlogu).
The deferral decision shall authorise the deductions to be made after the end of the deferral period in three annual instalments.
S sklepom o odlogu se odobrijo odbitki, ki se odštejejo po koncu obdobja odloga v treh letnih obrokih.
Where the total amount subject to the deferral decision represents more than 0,02 % of the Member State's Gross Domestic Product, the Commission may authorise the reimbursement in maximum five annual instalments.
Če skupni znesek, za katerega velja sklep o odlogu, znaša več kot 0,02 % bruto domačega proizvoda države članice, lahko Komisija odobri povračilo v največ petih letnih obrokih.
The Commission may decide, at the Member State's request and after consultation of the Committee on the Agricultural Funds, to extend once, for a period not exceeding 12 months, the time period of deferral referred to in the first subparagraph.
Komisija lahko obdobje odloga iz prvega pododstavka na zahtevo države članice in po posvetovanju z Odborom za kmetijska sklada podaljša enkrat za obdobje, ki ni daljše od 12 mesecev.
The Member State benefitting from a deferral decision shall ensure that the deficiencies which have been the reasons for the deductions and which persist at the time of adoption of the deferral decision are being remedied on the basis of an action plan, established in consultation with the Commission, including deadlines and clear progress indicators.
Država članica, ki ji je bil odobren odlog, zagotovi, da se pomanjkljivosti, zaradi katerih je prišlo do odbitkov in ki so v času sprejetja sklepa o odlogu še vedno prisotne, odpravijo na podlagi akcijskega načrta, ki je oblikovan po posvetovanju s Komisijo ter vsebuje roke in jasne kazalnike napredka.
The Commission shall amend or repeal the deferral decision, taking into account the principle of proportionality, in one of the following cases:
Komisija ob upoštevanju načela sorazmernosti spremeni ali razveljavi sklep o odlogu v naslednjih primerih:
the Member State fails to take the necessary actions to remedy the deficiencies as foreseen in the action plan;
država članica ne sprejme potrebnih ukrepov za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, kot je določeno v akcijskem načrtu;
the progress of the remedial actions is not sufficient according to the progress indicators; or
napredek ukrepov za odpravo pomanjkljivosti glede na kazalnike napredka ni zadosten; ali
the outcome of the actions is not satisfactory.
rezultat ukrepov ni zadovoljiv.
The implementing decisions referred to in paragraphs 8 and 8a shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 116(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013.
Izvedbena sklepa iz odstavkov 8 in 8a se sprejmeta v skladu s svetovalnim postopkom iz člena 116(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 of 6 August 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to paying agencies and other bodies, financial management, clearance of accounts, rules on checks, securities and transparency (OJ L 255, 28.8.2014, p. 59).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 908/2014 z dne 6. avgusta 2014 o pravilih za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi s plačilnimi agencijami in drugimi organi, finančnim upravljanjem, potrjevanjem obračunov, pravili o kontrolah, varščinami in preglednostjo (UL L 255, 28.8.2014, str. 59).
Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments (OJ L 53, 23.2.2002, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002 z dne 18. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi aranžmaja za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic (UL L 53, 23.2.2002, str. 1).
Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism (OJ L 118, 12.5.2010, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 407/2010 z dne 11. maja 2010 o vzpostavitvi Evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo (UL L 118, 12.5.2010, str. 1).
Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments (OJ L 53, 23.2.2002, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002 z dne 18. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi aranžmaja za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic (UL L 53, 23.2.2002, str.
Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism (OJ L 118, 12.5.2010, p. 1).’
1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/776
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/776
extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EU) No 502/2013 on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of bicycles consigned from Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines, whether declared as originating in Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines or not
o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 502/2013 na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz koles, poslanih iz Kambodže in Pakistana ter s Filipinov, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirana kot izdelki s poreklom iz Kambodže ali Pakistana ali s Filipinov ali ne
By Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 [2] the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 30,6 % on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China (China) (the original measures).
Svet je z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2474/93 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 30,6 % na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („Kitajska“) („prvotni ukrepi“).
Following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000 [3], decided that the above mentioned measures should be maintained.
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1524/2000 [3] sklenil, da je treba navedene ukrepe ohraniti.
Following an interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005 [4], increased the anti-dumping duty in force to 48,5 %.
Po vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1095/2005 [4] veljavno protidampinško dajatev zvišal na 48,5 %.
In May 2013, following an interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EU) No 502/2013 [5], decided to maintain the anti-dumping duty in force to 48,5 % except with regard to three companies to which individual duty rates were attributed (19,2 % for Zhejiang Baoguilai Vehicle Co.
Maja 2013 je Svet po vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe z Uredbo (EU) št. 502/2013 [5] sklenil ohraniti veljavno protidampinško dajatev v višini 48,5 %, razen za tri družbe, za katere so bile določene individualne stopnje dajatve (19,2 % za Zhejiang Baoguilai Vehicle Co.
Ltd, 0 % for Oyama Bicycles (Taicang) Co.
Ltd, 0 % za Oyama Bicycles (Taicang) Co. Ltd in 0 % za Ideal (Dongguan) Bike Co., Ltd) („obstoječi ukrepi“).
Ltd and 0 % for Ideal (Dongguan) Bike Co., Ltd) (the existing measures).
Maja 2013 je Svet po preiskavi proti izogibanju v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe z Uredbo (EU) št. 501/2013 [6] sklenil razširiti obstoječe ukrepe za uvoz koles s poreklom iz Kitajske na uvoz koles, poslanih iz Indonezije, Malezije, Šrilanke in Tunizije („prejšnja preiskava proti izogibanju“).
In May 2013, following an anti-circumvention investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 [6], decided to extend the existing measures on imports of bicycles originating in China to imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia (the previous anti-circumvention investigation).
Zahtevek
Request
Evropska komisija je 23. julija 2014 prejela zahtevek v skladu s členoma 13(3) in 14(5) osnovne uredbe, naj razišče morebitno izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Kitajske, ter naj uvede registracijo uvoza koles, poslanih iz Kambodže in Pakistana ter s Filipinov („države v preiskavi“), ne glede na to, ali so deklarirana kot izdelki s poreklom iz Kambodže ali Pakistana ali s Filipinov ali ne.
On 23 July 2014 the Commission received a request pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation to investigate the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of bicycles originating in China and to make imports of bicycles consigned from Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines (countries under investigation) whether declared as originating in Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines or not, subject to registration.
Zahtevek je vložilo Združenje evropskih proizvajalcev koles („EBMA“) v imenu petnajstih proizvajalcev koles v Uniji.
The request was lodged by the European Bicycle Manufacturers Association (EBMA) on behalf of 15 Union producers of bicycles.
Začetek
Initiation
Potem ko je Komisija po obvestilu državam članicam ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi prima facie za začetek preiskave v skladu s členoma 13(3) in 14(5) osnovne uredbe, je sklenila, da razišče morebitno izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Kitajske, ter uvede registracijo uvoza koles, poslanih iz Kambodže in Pakistana ter s Filipinov, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirana kot izdelki s poreklom iz Kambodže ali Pakistana ali s Filipinov ali ne.
Having determined, after having informed the Member States, that sufficient prima facie evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission decided to investigate the possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of bicycles originating in China and to make imports of bicycles consigned from Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines, whether declared as originating in Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines or not, subject to registration.
Preiskava se je začela z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 938/2014 z dne 2. septembra 2014 [7] („uredba o začetku preiskave“).
The investigation was initiated by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 938/2014 of 2 September 2014 [7] (the initiating Regulation).
Preiskava
Investigation
Komisija je o začetku preiskave uradno obvestila pristojne organe Kitajske, Kambodže, Pakistana in Filipinov, proizvajalce izvoznike v navedenih državah, uvoznike v Uniji, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter industrijo Unije.
The Commission officially advised the authorities of China, Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines, the exporting producers in those countries, the importers in the Union known to be concerned and the Union industry of the initiation of the investigation.
Obrazci zahtevka za izvzetje so bili poslani proizvajalcem/izvoznikom v Kambodži, Pakistanu in na Filipinih, ki so bili znani Komisiji, ali prek predstavništev Kambodže, Pakistana in Filipinov pri Evropski uniji.
Exemption forms were sent to the producers/exporters in Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines known to the Commission or through the Missions of Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines to the European Union.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani proizvajalcem/izvoznikom na Kitajskem, ki so bili znani Komisiji, ali prek predstavništva Kitajske pri Evropski uniji.
Questionnaires were sent to the producers/exporters in China known to the Commission or through the Mission of China to the European Union.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani tudi znanim nepovezanim uvoznikom v Uniji.
Questionnaires were also sent to the known unrelated importers in the Union.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da v roku iz uredbe o začetku preiskave pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the initiating Regulation.
Vse strani so bile obveščene, da se lahko v primeru nesodelovanja uporabi člen 18 osnovne uredbe in da lahko posledično ugotovitve temeljijo na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
The intervention of the Hearing Officer was requested in the investigation by the Pakistani company that cooperated in the investigation.
Izpolnjene obrazce zahtevka za izvzetje je predložilo pet proizvajalcev/izvoznikov v Kambodži, en v Pakistanu in dva na Filipinih.
The hearing took place on 23 March 2015.
Kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso povezani s proizvajalci/izvozniki iz držav v preiskavi, niso sodelovali.
The evidentiary value of Forms A for the bicycle parts purchased from a related company in Sri Lanka via a trader as explained in recital 98 and the application, by analogy, of Article 13(2)(b) of the basic Regulation for those bicycle parts purchased from Sri Lanka were discussed during the hearing.
Izpolnjen vprašalnik so predložili trije nepovezani uvozniki v Uniji.
Five producers/exporters in Cambodia, one in Pakistan and two in the Philippines submitted replies to the exemption forms.
Komisija je izvedla preveritvene obiske v naslednjih družbah:
There was no cooperation from the Chinese exporting producers unrelated to the producers/exporters from the countries under investigation.
proizvajalci v zadevnih državah:
Three unrelated importers in the Union submitted a questionnaire reply.
A and J (Cambodia) Co., Ltd., Sangkar Bavet, Krong Baver, Ket Svay Rieng, Kambodža,
The Commission carried out the verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Asia Leader International (Cambodia) Co.
producers in the countries concerned
Ltd., provinca Svay Rieng, Kambodža,
A and J (Cambodia) Co., Ltd, Sangkar Bavet, Krong Baver, Ket Svay Rieng, Cambodia,
Opaltech (Cambodia) Co.
Asia Leader International (Cambodia) Co.
Ltd., Khum Poek, Srok Angsnoul, provinca Kandal, Kambodža,
Ltd, Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia,
Smart Tech (Cambodia) Co., Ltd., Bavet City, Svay Rieng, Kambodža,
Ltd, Khum Poek, Srok Angsnoul, Kandal Province, Cambodia,
Ltd. in Bestway Industrial Co., Sangkat Bavet, Krong Bavet, provinca Svay Rieng, Kambodža,
Smart Tech (Cambodia) Co., Ltd, Bavet City, Svay Rieng, Cambodia,
Collie Cycle Inc., Cavite, Filipini,
Speedtech Industrial Co.
Procycle Industrial Inc., Cavite, Filipini;
related producer of bicycle parts to the producer of bicycles in Pakistan
Katunayake, Šrilanka.
Great Cycles (Pvt.)
Obdobje poročanja in obdobje preiskave
Ltd Katunayake, Sri Lanka.
Za obdobje poročanja od 1. septembra 2013 do 31. avgusta 2014 so se zbrali podrobnejši podatki za preverjanje, ali je uvoz oslabil popravljalni učinek veljavnih ukrepov glede cen in/ali količin ter ali obstaja damping.
Reporting period and investigation period
REZULTATI PREISKAVE
The investigation period covered the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 August 2014.
Splošne ugotovitve
Data were collected for the investigation period to investigate, inter alia, the alleged change in the pattern of trade following the imposition of measures and their extension to Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia in 2013 and the existence of a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty.
V skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe se je obstoj morebitnega izogibanja ukrepom ocenjeval z zaporedno analizo, v kateri se je ugotavljalo, ali je prišlo do spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja med Kitajsko, zadevnimi državami, državami, proti katerim so potekale prejšnje preiskave proti izogibanju, in Unijo; ali je ta sprememba nastala zaradi prakse, postopka ali dejavnosti, ki razen uvedbe dajatve nima ustreznega vzroka ali gospodarske utemeljitve; ali so obstajali dokazi o škodi ali o tem, da so popravljalne učinke dajatve oslabile cene in/ali količine izdelka v preiskavi; ter ali so obstajali dokazi o dampingu v zvezi s predhodno določenimi normalnimi vrednostmi, po potrebi v skladu z določbami člena 2 osnovne uredbe.
More detailed data were collected for the reporting period from 1 September 2013 to 31 August 2014 in order to examine if imports were undermining the remedial effect of the measures in force in terms of prices and/or quantities and the existence of dumping.
Zadevni izdelek in izdelek v preiskavi
RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION
Zadevni izdelek zajema dvokolesa in druga podobna kolesa (vključno z dostavnimi tricikli, a brez enokolesnikov) brez motornega pogona, ki so trenutno uvrščena pod oznaki KN 87120030 in ex87120070 ter s poreklom iz Kitajske („zadevni izdelek“).
General considerations
Izdelek v preiskavi je enak kot tisti, ki je opredeljen v prejšnji uvodni izjavi, le da je poslan iz Kambodže in Pakistana ter s Filipinov, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Kambodže in Pakistana ter s Filipinov ali ne, ki se trenutno uvršča pod iste oznake KN kot zadevni izdelek („izdelek v preiskavi“).
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the assessment of the existence of possible circumvention was made by analysing successively whether there was a change in the pattern of trade between China, the countries concerned, the countries subject to the previous anti-circumvention investigation and the Union; if this change stemmed from a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty; if there was evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty were being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the product under investigation; and whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established, if necessary in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo kolesa, kot so opredeljena zgoraj, izvožena v Unijo iz Kitajske, in kolesa, poslana v Unijo iz Kambodže in Pakistana ter s Filipinov, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter enako uporabo, zato jih je treba šteti za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Product concerned and product under investigation
Stopnja sodelovanja
The product concerned is bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles, but excluding unicycles), not motorised, currently falling within CN codes ex87120030 and ex87120070 and originating in China (the product concerned).
Kambodža
The product under investigation is the same as that defined above but consigned from Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines, whether declared as originating in Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines or not, currently falling within the same CN codes as the product concerned (the product under investigation).
V obdobju poročanja je v Kambodži kolesa proizvajalo šest družb.
The investigation showed that bicycles, as defined above, exported from China to the Union and those consigned from Cambodia, Pakistan and the Philippines to the Union have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and have the same uses, and are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Pet jih je sodelovalo in predalo zahtevek za izvzetje v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe.
Degree of cooperation
Teh pet družb po podatkih Comext [8] predstavlja malo več kot 100 % vsega uvoza iz Kambodže v Unijo.
Cambodia
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da določenega dela uvoza (in sicer na Nizozemsko) ni mogoče pripisati nobeni od sodelujočih družb, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 66 in 67.
During the reporting period six companies produced bicycles in Cambodia.
Posledično je bilo ugotovljeno, da sodelujoče družbe predstavljajo 94 % vsega uvoza iz Kambodže v Unijo.
Five cooperated and submitted a request for exemption in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ena od sodelujočih družb je povezana s tunizijsko družbo, pri kateri je bilo v prejšnji preiskavi proti izogibanju ugotovljeno, da se izogiba ukrepom.
These five companies covered slightly more than 100 % of the total imports from Cambodia to the Union as reported in Comext [8].
Šesta družba je povezana z družbo v Šrilanki, za katero veljajo ukrepi, razširjeni z Uredbo (EU) št. 501/2013, in s sodelujočo družbo v Pakistanu, omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 22.
However, the investigation showed that certain imports (namely to the Netherlands) could not be attributed to any of the cooperating companies as explained below in recitals 66 and 67.
Družba ni sodelovala v preiskavi.
As a result, it was established that the cooperating companies covered 94 % of the total imports from Cambodia to the Union.
Pakistan
One of the cooperating companies is related to a Tunisian company that was found circumventing the measures in the previous anti-circumvention investigation.
V obdobju poročanja je v Pakistanu kolesa proizvajala ena družba.