natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In that context, it appears appropriate to grant Member States, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, more flexibility to decide whether or not they wish to cultivate GMOs on their territory without affecting the risk assessment provided in the system of Union authorisations of GMOs, either in the course of the authorisation procedure or thereafter, and independently of the measures that Member States cultivating GMOs are entitled or required to take by application of Directive 2001/18/EC to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in other products.
V tem okviru se zdi ustrezno, da se državam članicam v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti omogoči več prožnosti, da lahko v postopku odobritve ali pozneje odločijo ali želijo na svojem ozemlju gojiti GSO ali ne, ne da bi to vplivalo na oceno tveganja v okviru sistema Unije za odobritve GSO, in neodvisno od ukrepov, ki jih države članice, ki gojijo GSO, sprejmejo ali morajo sprejeti na podlagi Direktive 2001/18/ES za preprečevanje nenamerne prisotnosti GSO v drugih proizvodih.
The grant of that possibility to Member States is likely to improve the process for authorisations of GMOs and, at the same time, is also likely to ensure freedom of choice of consumers, farmers and operators whilst providing greater clarity to affected stakeholders concerning the cultivation of GMOs in the Union.
Z zagotovitvijo te možnosti državam članicam se bo verjetno izboljšal postopek odobritev GSO in hkrati bodo potrošniki, kmetje in nosilci dejavnosti verjetno ohranili svobodno izbiro, zadevni deležniki pa bodo bolje informirani o gojenju GSO v Uniji.
This Directive should therefore facilitate the smooth functioning of the internal market.
Ta direktiva bi zato morala spodbujati nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga.
In order to ensure that the cultivation of GMOs does not result in their unintended presence in other products and whilst respecting the principle of subsidiarity, particular attention should be paid to the prevention of possible cross-border contamination from a Member State where cultivation is allowed into a neighbouring Member State where it is prohibited, unless the Member States concerned agree that particular geographical conditions render it unnecessary.
Za zagotovitev, da gojenje GSO ne bi povzročilo njihove nenamerne prisotnosti v drugih proizvodih in ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti bi bilo treba posebno pozornost nameniti preprečevanju možnih čezmejnih okužb iz države članice, kjer je gojenje dovoljeno, v sosednjo državo članico, kjer je prepovedano, razen če se zadevne države članice strinjajo, da to zaradi posebnih geografskih razmer ni potrebno.
The Commission Recommendation of 13 July 2010 [17] provides guidance to Member States for the development of coexistence measures, including in border areas.
Priporočilo Komisije z dne 13. julija 2010 [17] državam članicam daje smernice za pripravo ukrepov za soobstoj, tudi na obmejnih območjih.
The recommendation encourages Member States to cooperate with each other to implement appropriate measures at the borders between Member States so as to avoid unintended consequences of cross-border contamination.
Priporočilo spodbuja države članice, naj sodelujejo pri izvajanju ustreznih ukrepov na mejah med državami članicami, s katerimi bi se izognili nenamernim posledicam čezmejnih okužb.
During the authorisation procedure of a given GMO, the possibility should be provided for a Member State to demand that the geographical scope of the notification/application submitted in accordance with Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC or in accordance with Articles 5 and 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 be adjusted to the effect that all or part of the territory of that Member State be excluded from cultivation.
Posamezna država članica bi morala imeti možnost, da med postopkom odobritve določenega GSO zahteva, da se geografsko področje uporabe iz prijave/vloge, predložene v skladu z delom C Direktive 2001/18/ES ali v skladu s členoma 5 in 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003, prilagodi tako, da bo celotno ozemlje ali del ozemlja te države članice izključeno iz gojenja.
The Commission should facilitate the procedure by presenting the demand of the Member State to the notifier/applicant without delay and the notifier/applicant should respond to that demand within an established timelimit.
Komisija bi morala postopek olajšati s takojšnjim posredovanjem zahteve države članice prijavitelju/vlagatelju, slednji pa bi moral na to zahtevo odgovoriti v določenem roku.
The geographical scope of the notification/application should be adjusted accordingly unless the notifier/applicant confirms the geographical scope of its notification/application within an established timelimit from the communication by the Commission of that demand.
Geografsko področje uporabe iz prijave/vloge bi bilo treba ustrezno prilagoditi, razen če prijavitelj/vlagatelj potrdi geografsko področje uporabe iz prijave/vloge v določenem roku po tem, ko mu je Komisija to zahtevo posredovala.
Such confirmation, however, is without prejudice to the Commission's powers in accordance with Article 19 of Directive 2001/18/EC or Articles 7 and 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, as the case may be, to make such an adjustment, where appropriate, in the light of the environmental risk assessment carried out by the Authority.
Vendar pa takšna potrditev ne posega v pooblastila Komisije v skladu s členom 19 Direktive 2001/18/ES oziroma členoma 7 in 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003, da – kadar je ustrezno – izvede tako prilagoditev ob upoštevanju ocene tveganja za okolje, ki jo pripravi Agencija.
Whilst it is expected that most restrictions or prohibitions adopted pursuant to this Directive will be implemented at the stage of consent/authorisation or renewal thereof, there should, in addition, also be the possibility for Member States to adopt reasoned measures restricting or prohibiting the cultivation in all or part of their territory of a GMO, or of a group of GMOs defined by crop or trait, once authorised, on the basis of grounds distinct from and complementary to those assessed according to the harmonized set of Union rules, that is Directive 2001/18/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, which are in conformity with Union law.
Večina omejitev ali prepovedi, sprejetih na podlagi te direktive, naj bi se začela izvajati na stopnji odobritve ali ponovne odobritve, vendar bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da sprejmejo utemeljene ukrepe, s katerimi na svojem celotnem ozemlju ali njegovem delu omejijo ali prepovejo gojenje GSO ali skupine GSO, opredeljenih po vrsti pridelka ali lastnosti, ki sta bili prej odobreni, in sicer na podlagi razlogov, ki niso razlogi, ocenjeni glede na usklajeni sklop predpisov Unije – to je glede na Direktivo 2001/18/ES in Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003 – in ki jih hkrati dopolnjujejo, in ki so v skladu s pravom Unije.
Those grounds may be invoked individually or in combination, depending on the particular circumstances of the Member State, region or area in which those measures will apply.
Države članice bi torej zato, da bi se izognili vsakršnemu poseganju v pristojnosti, ki so na podlagi Direktive 2001/18/ES in Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 podeljene odgovornim za ocenjevanje in obvladovanje tveganja, morale uporabiti le razloge, ki so povezani s cilji okoljske politike v zvezi z vplivi, ki se razlikujejo od ocen tveganj za zdravje in okolje, ki se ocenjujejo v okviru postopkov odobritve iz Direktive 2001/18/ES in Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003, in jih hkrati dopolnjujejo, kot so na primer ohranjanje in razvoj kmetijske prakse, ki nudi boljši potencial za uskladitev proizvodnje in trajnosti ekosistemov, ali ohranjanje lokalne biotske raznovrstnosti, vključno z določenimi habitati in ekosistemi, ali določenimi vrstami naravnih in pokrajinskih značilnosti, pa tudi posebnih funkcij in storitev ekosistemov.
The level of protection of human or animal health and of the environment chosen in the Union allows for a uniform scientific assessment throughout the Union and this Directive should not alter that situation.
Države članice bi morale imeti tudi možnost, da odločitve, ki jih sprejmejo na podlagi Direktive 2001/18/ES, utemeljijo z razlogi, povezanimi s socialno-ekonomskimi vplivi, ki bi lahko izhajali iz gojenja GSO na ozemlju zadevne države članice.
Therefore, to avoid any interference with the competences which are granted to the risk assessors and risk managers under Directive 2001/18/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, a Member State should only use grounds with respect to environmental policy objectives relating to impacts which are distinct from and complementary to the assessment of risks to health and the environment which are assessed in the context of the authorisation procedures provided in Directive 2001/18/EC and in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, such as the maintenance and development of agricultural practices which offer a better potential to reconcile production with ecosystem sustainability, or maintenance of local biodiversity, including certain habitats and ecosystems, or certain types of natural and landscape features, as well as specific ecosystem functions and services.
Čeprav je ukrepe za soobstoj Komisija že obravnavala v svojem priporočilu z dne 13. julija 2010, bi morale države članice imeti tudi možnost, da na podlagi te direktive sprejmejo ukrepe za omejitev ali prepoved gojenja odobrenih GSO na svojem celotnem ozemlju ali njegovem delu.
Member States should also be able to base the decisions which they adopt pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC on grounds concerning socioeconomic impacts which might arise from the cultivation of a GMO on the territory of the Member State concerned.
Ti razlogi so lahko povezani z visokimi stroški, s tem, da je ukrepe za soobstoj zaradi posebnih geografskih razmer, na primer na majhnih otokih ali na gorskih območjih, težko ali nemogoče izvajati, ali s potrebo po tem, da bi se izognili prisotnosti GSO v drugih proizvodih, na primer v posebnih ali določenih proizvodih.
While coexistence measures have been addressed by the Commission Recommendation of 13 July 2010, there should also be the possibility for Member States to adopt measures restricting or prohibiting cultivation of authorised GMOs in all or part of their territory under this Directive.
Poleg tega je Komisija v skladu z zahtevami sklepov Sveta iz leta 2008 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročala o socialno-ekonomskih posledicah gojenja GSO.
Those grounds may be related to the high cost, impracticability or impossibility of implementing coexistence measures due to specific geographical conditions, such as small islands or mountain zones, or the need to avoid GMO presence in other products such as specific or particular products.
Ugotovitve tega poročila lahko državam članicam zagotovijo koristne informacije pri sprejemanju odločitev na podlagi te direktive.
Furthermore, the Commission has, as requested in the 2008 Council conclusions, reported to the European Parliament and the Council on socioeconomic implications of GMO cultivation.
Razlogi, povezani s cilji kmetijske politike, lahko vključujejo potrebo po varovanju raznolikosti kmetijske proizvodnje in potrebo po zagotavljanju čistosti semen.
The outcome of that report may provide valuable information for Member States considering taking decisions on the basis of this Directive.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti dovoljeno tudi, da ukrepe utemeljijo z drugimi razlogi, ki lahko zajemajo rabo zemljišč, prostorsko načrtovanje ali druge upravičene dejavnike, tudi tiste, povezane s kulturno tradicijo.
Grounds relating to agricultural policy objectives may include the need to protect the diversity of agricultural production and the need to ensure seed and plant propagating material purity.
Omejitve ali prepovedi, sprejete na podlagi te direktive, bi se morale nanašati na gojenje in ne na prosti pretok in uvoz gensko spremenjenih semen in razmnoževalnega materiala rastlin kot proizvodov ali v proizvodih ter njihovih pridelkov in bi morale biti poleg tega v skladu s Pogodbama, zlasti glede načela nediskriminacije med nacionalnimi in nenacionalnimi proizvodi, načela sorazmernosti ter člena 34, člena 36 in člena 216(2) PDEU.
Member States should also be allowed to base their measures on other grounds that may include land use, town and country planning, or other legitimate factors including those relating to cultural traditions.
Ukrepi, ki jih države članice sprejmejo na podlagi te direktive, bi morali biti podvrženi postopku nadzora in informacij na ravni Unije.
The restrictions or prohibitions adopted pursuant to this Directive should refer to the cultivation, and not to the free circulation and import, of genetically modified seeds and plant propagating material as, or in, products and of the products of their harvest, and should, furthermore, be in conformity with the Treaties, in particular as regards the principle of non-discrimination between national and non-national products, the principle of proportionality and Article 34, Article 36 and Article 216(2) TFEU.
Glede na raven nadzora in informacij Unije ni treba še dodatno predvideti uporabe Direktive 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [18].
Member States' measures adopted pursuant to this Directive should be subject to a procedure of scrutiny and information at Union level.
Države članice lahko omejijo ali prepovejo gojenje GSO na svojem celotnem ozemlju ali njegovem delu od datuma začetka veljavnosti odobritve Unije in za celotno obdobje veljavnosti odobritve, pod pogojem, da je poteklo določeno obdobje mirovanja, med katerim je imela Komisija možnost predložiti pripombe glede predlaganih ukrepov.
In the light of the level of Union scrutiny and information, it is not necessary to provide, in addition, for the application of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [18].
Zadevna država članica bi morala zato osnutek teh ukrepov najmanj 75 dni pred njihovim sprejetjem predložiti Komisiji, da bi ji tako omogočila podajo pripomb, v tem obdobju pa ne bi smela sprejeti in izvajati teh ukrepov.
Member States may restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs in all or part of their territory as from the date of entry into force of the Union authorisation and for the whole duration of the consent/authorisation, provided that an established standstill period, during which the Commission was given the opportunity to comment on the proposed measures, has elapsed.
Ob poteku določenega obdobja mirovanja bi morala imeti država članica možnost, da sprejme ukrepe, kot so bili prvotno predlagani ali kot so bili spremenjeni, da bi se upoštevale pripombe Komisije.
The Member State concerned should therefore communicate a draft of those measures to the Commission at least 75 days prior to their adoption, in order to give the Commission an opportunity to comment thereon, and should refrain from adopting and implementing those measures during that period.
Vlagatelj/imetnik odobritve, ki ga zadevajo ukrepi o omejitvi ali prepovedi gojenja GSO v državi članici, bi se moral v določenem obdobju mirovanja vzdržati vseh dejavnosti, povezanih z gojenjem tega GSO v tej državi članici.
On the expiry of the established standstill period, the Member State should be able to adopt the measures as originally proposed or amended to take into account the Commission's comments.
Odločitve držav članic o omejitvi ali prepovedi gojenja GSO na svojem celotnem ozemlju ali njegovem delu ne bi smele preprečevati izvajanja biotehnoloških raziskav, pod pogojem, da se pri njihovem izvajanju upoštevajo vsi potrebni varnostni ukrepi, povezani z zdravjem ljudi in živali ter z varstvom okolja, in da zaradi te dejavnosti ni ogroženo spoštovanje razlogov, zaradi katerih je bila omejitev ali prepoved uvedena.
During the established standstill period, the authorisation applicant/holder who would be affected by measures restricting or prohibiting the cultivation of a GMO in a Member State should refrain from all activities related to the cultivation of that GMO in that Member State.
Poleg tega bi si morale Agencija in države članice prizadevati za oblikovanje široke mreže znanstvenih organizacij z vseh področij, tudi ekoloških, in bi morale sodelovati, tako da bi že v zgodnji fazi ugotovili, ali med znanstvenimi mnenji prihaja do morebitnih razhajanj, da bi rešili oziroma razjasnili sporna znanstvena vprašanja.
Decisions to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs by Member States in all or part of their territory should not prevent biotechnology research from being carried out provided that, in carrying out such research, all necessary safety measures relating to human and animal health and environmental protection are observed and that the activity does not undermine the respect of the grounds on which the restriction or prohibition has been introduced.
Komisija in države članice bi morale zagotoviti potrebna sredstva za neodvisne raziskave o morebitnih tveganjih, ki izhajajo iz namernega sproščanja GSO ali njihovega dajanja v promet, pa tudi, da bi se neodvisnim raziskovalcem omogočil dostop do vsega ustreznega gradiva ob spoštovanju pravic intelektualne lastnine.
Moreover, the Authority and the Member States should aim to establish an extensive network of scientific organisations representing all disciplines including those relating to ecological issues, and should cooperate to identify at an early stage any potential divergence between scientific opinions with a view to resolving or clarifying contentious scientific issues.
Glede na pomembnost znanstvenih dokazov pri odločanju o odobritvi ali prepovedi GSO bi morala Agencija zbrati in analizirati rezultate raziskav glede tveganja ali nevarnosti za zdravje ljudi ali okolje zaradi GSO ter o vseh pojavljajočih se tveganjih obvestiti odgovorne za obvladovanje tveganj.
The Commission and the Member States should ensure that the necessary resources for independent research on the potential risks arising from the deliberate release or the placing on the market of GMOs are secured, and that independent researchers should be given access to all relevant material, while respecting intellectual property rights.
Te informacije bi morale biti dostopne javnosti.
Given the importance of scientific evidence in taking decisions on the prohibition or approval of GMOs, the Authority should collect and analyse the results of research regarding the risk or danger to human health or the environment of GMOs and inform the risk managers of any emerging risks.
Država članica bi morala imeti možnost, da pristojni organ ali Komisijo zaprosi za ponovno vključitev celotnega svojega ozemlja ali njegovega dela v geografsko področje uporabe iz odobritve, iz katere je bilo prej izključeno.
Such information should be made available to the public.
V tem primeru zahteve ne bi bilo treba posredovati imetniku odobritve in zaprositi za njegovo privolitev.
A Member State should be able to request the competent authority or the Commission to reintegrate all or part of its territory into the geographical scope of the consent/authorisation from which it was previously excluded.
Geografsko področje uporabe iz odobritve ali odločitve o odobritvi bi moral ustrezno spremeniti pristojni organ, ki je izdal pisno odobritev ali Komisija na podlagi Direktive 2001/18/ES oziroma Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003.
In that case, there should be no need to forward the request to the consent/authorisation holder and ask for his agreement.
Pisne odobritve ali odločbe o odobritvi, izdane ali sprejete z geografskim področjem uporabe, ki je omejeno na določena območja, ali ukrepi, ki jih države članice sprejmejo v skladu s to direktivo, ki omejujejo ali prepovedujejo gojenje GSO, drugim državam ne bi smeli preprečevati ali omejevati uporabe odobrenih GSO.
The competent authority which has issued the written consent or the Commission, under Directive 2001/18/EC or Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 respectively, should amend the geographical scope of the consent or of the decision of authorisation accordingly.
Poleg tega ta direktiva in nacionalni ukrepi, sprejeti na njeni podlagi, ne bi smeli posegati v zahteve prava Unije glede nenamerne in naključne prisotnosti GSO v gensko nespremenjenih sortah semen in razmnoževalnem materialu rastlin, niti preprečevati gojenja sort, ki izpolnjujejo te zahteve.
Written consents or decisions of authorisation issued or adopted with a geographical scope limited to certain areas or measures adopted by Member States, in accordance with this Directive, which restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs, should not prevent or restrict the use of authorised GMOs by other Member States.
Uredba (ES) št. 1829/2003 določa, da se morajo sklicevanja na GSO, odobrene v skladu z delom C Direktive 2001/18/ES, v delih A in D navedene direktive enakovredno uporabljati za GSO, odobrene v skladu z navedeno uredbo.
In addition, this Directive and the national measures adopted pursuant to it should be without prejudice to Union law requirements concerning unintended and adventitious presence of GMOs in non-genetically modified varieties of seed and plant propagating material, and should not prevent the cultivation of varieties complying with these requirements.
Zato bi se morali ukrepi, ki jih države članice sprejmejo v skladu z Direktivo 2001/18/ES, uporabljati tudi za GSO, odobrene v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003.
Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 provides that references made in Parts A and D of Directive 2001/18/EC to GMOs authorised under Part C of that Directive are to be considered as applying equally to GMOs authorised under that Regulation.
Ta direktiva ne posega v obveznost držav članic kar zadeva prosti pretok konvencionalnih semen, razmnoževalnega materiala rastlin ter proizvodov iz pridelkov na podlagi ustreznega prava Unije in v skladu s PDEU.
Accordingly, measures adopted by the Member States in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC should also apply to GMOs authorised in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Za zagotovitev visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov bi morale države članice in nosilci gospodarske dejavnosti na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 in Uredbe (ES) št. 1830/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [19] sprejeti tudi učinkovite ukrepe za označevanje in obveščanje, da se zagotovi preglednost v zvezi s prisotnostjo GSO v proizvodih.
This Directive is without prejudice to Member States' obligations as regards the free movement of conventional seeds, plant propagating material and of the product of the harvest pursuant to relevant Union law and in accordance with the TFEU.
Da bi še pred začetkom veljavnosti te direktive njene cilje uskladili z legitimnimi interesi nosilcev gospodarske dejavnosti v zvezi z GSO, ki so bili odobreni ali so v postopku odobritve, bi bilo treba sprejeti določbe o ustreznih prehodnih ukrepih.
In order to guarantee a high level of consumer protection, Member States and operators should also take effective labelling and information measures pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council [19] to guarantee transparency with regard to the presence of GMOs in products.
Prehodni ukrepi so tudi upravičeni, ker se je treba izogniti morebitnemu izkrivljanju konkurence, s tem ko bi obstoječe imetnike odobritve obravnavali drugače kot bodoče vlagatelje vlog za odobritev v prihodnje.
In order to reconcile the objectives of this Directive with the legitimate interests of economic operators in relation to GMOs which have been authorised, or which were in the process of being authorised, before the entry into force of this Directive, provision should be made for appropriate transitional measures.
Zaradi pravne varnosti bi moralo biti obdobje, v katerem se lahko sprejmejo taki prehodni ukrepi, omejeno na čas, ki je nujno potreben za zagotovitev nemotenega prehoda na novo ureditev.