natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the sampled exporting producers the normal value was determined as follows:
Na podlagi tega je bila skupna prodaja vsakega vzorčenega proizvajalca izvoznika podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu reprezentativna.
The Commission first examined whether the total volume of domestic sales for each sampled exporting producer was representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je za proizvajalce izvoznike z reprezentativno domačo prodajo naknadno ugotovila, katere vrste izdelkov, prodanih na domačem trgu, so bile enake ali primerljive z vrstami izdelkov, prodanih za izvoz v Unijo.
The domestic sales are representative if the total domestic sales volume of the like product to independent customers on the domestic market per exporting producer represented at least 5 % of its total export sales volume of the product concerned to the Union during the investigation period.
Komisija je nato v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali je bila domača prodaja vsakega vzorčenega proizvajalca izvoznika na njegovem domačem trgu reprezentativna za vsako vrsto izdelka, ki je enaka ali primerljiva z vrsto izdelka, prodanega za izvoz v Unijo.
On this basis, the total sales by each sampled exporting producer of the like product on the domestic market were representative.
Domača prodaja vrste izdelka je reprezentativna, če celotni obseg domače prodaje navedene vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam v obdobju preiskave predstavlja vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza enake ali primerljive vrste izdelka v Unijo.
The Commission subsequently identified the product types sold domestically that were identical or comparable with the product types sold for export to the Union for the exporting producers with representative domestic sales.
Komisija je nato v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe za vsako vrsto izdelka določila delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v obdobju preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije, da bi se odločila, ali bo za izračun normalne vrednosti uporabila dejansko domačo prodajo.
The Commission then examined whether the domestic sales by each sampled exporting producer on its domestic market for each product type that is identical or comparable with a product type sold for export to the Union were representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost temelji na dejanski domači ceni za posamezno vrsto izdelka ne glede na to, ali je navedena prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne:
The domestic sales of a product type are representative if the total volume of domestic sales of that product type to independent customers during the investigation period represents at least 5 % of the total volume of export sales of the identical or comparable product type to the Union.
če je obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodanega po neto prodajni ceni, enaki izračunanim stroškom proizvodnje ali višji od njih, predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka, ter
The Commission next defined the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market for each product type during the absorption investigation period in order to decide whether to use actual domestic sales for the calculation of the normal value, in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
je tehtana povprečna prodajna cena navedene vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto.
The normal value is based on the actual domestic price per product type, irrespective of whether those sales are profitable or not, if:
V tem primeru je normalna vrednost tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje navedene vrste izdelka v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije.
the sales volume of the product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of this product type; and
Normalna vrednost je dejanska domača cena za vrsto izdelka, in sicer izključno pri dobičkonosni domači prodaji vrst izdelka v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije:
the weighted average sales price of that product type is equal to or higher than the unit cost of production.
če obseg dobičkonosne prodaje vrste izdelka predstavlja 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka ali
In this case, the normal value is the weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that product type during the AIP.
če je tehtana povprečna cena te vrste izdelka nižja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto.
The normal value is the actual domestic price per product type of only the profitable domestic sales of the product types during the AIP, if:
Normalna vrednost je bila izračunana kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije ali kot tehtano povprečje samo dobičkonosne prodaje.
the volume of profitable sales of the product type represents 80 % or less of the total sales volume of this type; or
Vse cene, uporabljene za izračune stopnje dampinga, so se pretvorile v indijsko valuto z uporabo obračunskih tečajev za vsako transakcijo.
the weighted average price of this product type is below the unit cost of production.
Izvozna cena
Normal value was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales during the AIP or as a weighted average of the profitable sales only.
Komisija je uporabila izvozne cene iz obdobja ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije, določene tako, kot je razloženo v uvodnih izjavah 22 do 25 zgoraj.
All prices used for the dumping margin calculations were converted to Indian currency using transaction by transaction conversion rates.
Primerjava
Export price
Komisija je normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno teh proizvajalcev izvoznikov primerjala na podlagi franko tovarna.
The Commission used export prices from the AIP determined as explained in recitals 22-25 above.
Kadar je Komisija to lahko upravičila s potrebo po zagotovitvi poštene primerjave, je v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe normalno vrednost in/ali izvozno ceno prilagodila za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in njihovo primerljivost.
Comparison
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene za prevoznino, zavarovanje, stroške kreditov, stroške pakiranja in dajatve.
The Commission compared the normal value and the export price of these exporting producers on an ex-works basis.
Stopnja dampinga
Where justified by the need to ensure a fair comparison, the Commission adjusted the normal value and/or the export price for differences affecting prices and price comparability, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je za vzorčene sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike primerjala tehtano povprečno normalno vrednost vsake vrste podobnega izdelka s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka v skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe.
Adjustments were made for freight, insurance, credit cost, packing expenses and duties.
Na podlagi tega se je tehtano povprečje stopenj dampinga, izraženo kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, gibalo na naslednji način:
Dumping margin
Ime družbe
For the sampled cooperating exporting producers, the Commission compared the weighted average normal value of each type of the like product with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Primerljivost vrste izdelka
On this basis, the weighted average dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, developed as follows:
Stopnja dampinga v obdobju prvotne preiskave
Company Name
Stopnja dampinga v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije
Product Type Comparability
Gibanje stopnje dampinga
Dumping Margin in OIP
Stopnja odprave škode
Dumping Margin in AIP
V skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve iz člena 9(4) osnovne uredbe je Komisija ponovno izračunala stopnjo škode za družbo Venus Group, katere stopnja dampinga se je povišala.
Evolution of Dumping Margin
Stopnja odprave škode je bila določena na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno uvozno ceno družbe Venus Group v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije in tehtano povprečno neškodljivo ceno podobnega izdelka, ki so ga vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije prodajali na trgu Unije.
Injury elimination level
Kakršna koli razlika, ki izhaja iz te primerjave, je bila nato izražena kot odstotek tehtane povprečne uvozne vrednosti CIF.
In accordance with the lesser duty rule under Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, for Venus Group whose dumping margin increased, the Commission recalculated the injury margin.
Na podlagi navedenega se je stopnja škode za družbo Venus Group povišala s 23,4 % na 65,7 %.
The injury elimination level was determined on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average import price of Venus Group during the AIP, with the weighted average non-injurious price of the like product sold by the sampled Union producers on the Union market during the AIP.
D. SKLEP
Any difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the weighted average import CIF value.
Ponovni izračun stopenj dampinga v skladu z metodologijo iz uvodnih izjav 31 do 38 zgoraj je pokazal, da se je za pet od šestih vzorčenih družb stopnja dampinga v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije znižala.
On that basis, the injury margin for Venus Group increased from 23,4 % to 65,7 %.
Zato bi bilo treba zaključiti ponovno preiskavo za ugotavljanje absorpcije za te družbe brez spreminjanja prvotnih ukrepov.
D. CONCLUSION
V primeru družbe Venus Group se je izračunana stopnja dampinga v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije povišala v primerjavi s tisto, ki je bila ugotovljena v obdobju prvotne preiskave, kar dokazuje absorpcijo.
The recalculation of the dumping margins according to the methodology described in recitals 31-38 above showed that for five out of six sampled companies the dumping margin decreased in the AIP.
Zato bi bilo treba protidampinške ukrepe, uvedene na uvoz zadevnega izdelka s strani družbe Venus Group spremeniti v skladu s členom 12(3) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, for these companies the absorption reinvestigation should be terminated without amending the original measures.
Za družbo Venus Group je Komisija v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve iz člena 9(4) osnovne uredbe najprej primerjala stopnjo škode in stopnjo dampinga.
In the case of Venus Group the dumping margin calculated for the AIP increased compared to that established in the OIP, demonstrating in that way that absorption was taking place.
Višino dajatev bi bilo treba določiti na ravni stopnje dampinga.
Hence, anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of the product concerned by the Venus Group should be amended in accordance with Article 12(3) of the basic Regulation.
Ker ta ponovna preiskava ne vpliva na protisubvencijsko preiskavo, je treba za določitev nove protidampinške dajatve odšteti izravnalno dajatev.
As regards Venus Group, in accordance with the lesser duty rule in Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first compared the injury margin and the dumping margin.
Zato nova protidampinška dajatev za družbo Venus Group znaša 9,4 % (tj. trenutno veljavna stopnja dampinga v višini 12,4 %, zmanjšana za izravnalno dajatev v višini 3 %).
The amount of the duties should be set at the level of the dumping margin.
Popravljena stopnja protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatev, je naslednja:
As the anti-subsidy investigation remains unaffected by the present reinvestigation the countervailing duty needs to be deducted in order to determine the new anti-dumping duty.
Družba
Consequently, for Venus Group the new anti-dumping duty is 9,4 % (i.e. the currently applicable dumping margin of 12,4 % minus 3 % countervailing duty).
Izravnalna dajatev
The revised rate of anti-dumping duty applicable, before duty, to the net free-at-Union-frontier price will be as follows:
Stopnja škode
Company
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve
Countervailing duty
Sodelujoče nevzorčene družbe
Injury margin
Vse druge družbe
Definitive anti-dumping duty rate
Vse strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti ohranitev obstoječih ukrepov.
Cooperating non-sampled companies
Po navedenem razkritju jim je bilo odobreno tudi obdobje za predložitev pripomb.
All other companies
Stališča in pripombe so bili ustrezno upoštevani, kadar je bilo to upravičeno.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend that the existing measures be maintained.
Dve zainteresirani strani sta predložili pripombe, s katerimi sta nasprotovali sklepom Komisije.
They were also granted a period to submit comments subsequent to that disclosure.
Pritožnik je ponovil svojo trditev iz pritožbe, da padec izvoznih cen ni rezultat gibanja cen surovin.
The submissions and comments were duly taken into consideration where warranted.
To trditev je ponazoril s podatki, ki prikazujejo povišanje cene niklja po uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov.
Two interested parties submitted comments challenging the Commission's conclusions.
Vendar so prvotni ukrepi temeljili na ugotovitvah iz obdobja prvotne preiskave, zato je potrebna ustrezna primerjava med cenami surovin v obdobju prvotne preiskave in cenami v obdobju preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije.
The complainant reiterated the claim it already made in the complaint that the drop in export prices is not a result of developments in raw material prices.
Navedena primerjava vodi do sklepa, da so se cene surovin znižale, zato je treba zavrniti zgornjo trditev.
It illustrated this statement by providing data showing the increase of the nickel price after the imposition of the definitive measures.
Pritožnik je za enega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki ni zahteval določitve nove normalne vrednosti, trdil, da se je Komisija zmotila pri izračunu.
However, since the original measures were based on the findings of the original investigation period, the proper comparison that must be made is between the raw material prices during the original investigation period and the ones during the absorption investigation period.
Vendar je tožnik pri cenah v obdobju prvotne preiskave uporabil menjalni tečaj INR/EUR z začetka obdobja ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije in menjalni tečaj INR/EUR s konca obdobja ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije pri cenah v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije, zato se njegova utemeljitev ovrže.
That comparison leads to a conclusion of decreasing raw material prices and the above claim therefore must be rejected.
Trditev je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
For the one exporting producer not having applied for a new normal value determination, the complainant alleged that the Commission made a calculation error.
Proizvajalec izvoznik, za katerega bo spremenjena protidampinška dajatev, je trdil, da ocena domnevnega nezadostnega gibanja cen, ki jo je opravila Komisija, ni skladna s pomenom in namenom člena 12 osnovne uredbe.
However, the complainant applied an INR/EUR exchange rate of the beginning of the AIP to the prices found during the OIP and an INR/EUR exchange rate of the end of the AIP to the prices found during the AIP, invalidating its reasoning.
Natančneje bi morala Komisija pri svoji primerjavi cen upoštevati gibanje menjalnih tečajev in gibanje proizvodnih stroškov, ki ga je upoštevala na ravni drugih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so zahtevali uporabo člena 12(5) na podlagi načela dobrega upravljanja.
The claim therefore had to be rejected.
Dejansko se ta vrsta trditve nanaša na stroške proizvodnje in jo je mogoče upoštevati samo v okviru ponovne preiskave normalne vrednosti.
The exporting producer for which the anti-dumping duty will be amended claimed that the Commission did not carry out the evaluation of the alleged insufficient movement in prices in a way that is compatible with the meaning and purpose of Article 12 of the basic Regulation.
Vendar se v skladu s členom 12(5) osnovne uredbe domnevne spremembe normalne vrednosti upoštevajo samo, kadar so dane Komisiji na razpolago popolne informacije o popravljenih normalnih vrednostih.
More specifically, in its price comparison, the Commission should have taken the exchange rate evolution into account as well as the evolution of production costs that it has observed at the level of the other exporting producers, who requested the application of Article 12(5), on the basis of a required spirit of good administration.
V tem primeru ni bilo tako in trditev se zavrne.
In fact, this type of claim refers to costs of production, and can only be taken into account in the context of a reexamination of normal value.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je predložil številne pripombe in trditve glede določitve njegove stopnje dampinga na podlagi izvoznih cen v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije in normalnih vrednosti, določenih v obdobju prvotne preiskave.
However, pursuant to Article 12(5) of the basic Regulation, alleged changes in normal value shall only be taken into account where complete information on revised normal values is made available to the Commission.
Od Komisije je zahteval izključitev transakcij svojega povezanega uvoznika v prvem mesecu obdobja ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije, ker se je ta prodaja nanašala na blago, ki so ga odpremili indijski proizvajalci izvozniki iz družbe Venus Group pred obdobjem ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije na podlagi cen, ki so bile tudi določene pred obdobjem ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije.
This was not the case and the claim is rejected.
Ta argument je podkrepil z navedbo, da je prodaja iz Indije povezanemu uvozniku in od povezanega uvoznika do nepovezanih strank Unije nakup in prodaja za svoj račun („back to back“).
The same exporting producer also made a number of comments and claims regarding the determination of its dumping margin based on export prices during the AIP and normal values determined during the OIP.
Najprej je treba poudariti, da Komisija procesa prodaje proizvajalca izvoznika ne obravnava kot nakupa in prodaje za svoj račun.
It requested the Commission to exclude transactions made by its related importer during the first month of the AIP since these sales referred to goods shipped by the Indian exporting producers of the Venus group prior to the AIP on the basis of prices determined equally before the AIP.
V Indiji bi v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije povezanemu uvozniku lahko prodajal kateri koli indijski proizvajalec izvoznik iz skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov in izdelke odpremil skupaj, ustrezni uvoženi izdelki pa so bili v številnih primerih prodani različnim strankam Unije in so delno vstopili v zaloge povezanega uvoznika.
It underscored this argument by arguing that the sales from India to the related importer and from the related importer to the Union unrelated customers are back to back sales.
Po drugi strani pa to pomeni, da bi lahko bila prodaja nepovezani stranki Unije, o kateri je poročal povezani uvoznik v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije, del ene ali več neposrednih dostav iz Indije s strani enega ali več indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz skupine, prodaja iz zaloge ali kombinacija obeh.
In the first place it should be noted that the Commission does not consider the exporting producer's sales process to the Union a back to back operation.
Zaradi teh okoliščin takega uvoza ni mogoče opredeliti kot nakup in prodajo za svoj račun.
Sales from India during the AIP to the related importer could be made by any of the Indian exporting producers of the exporting producer's group and also clubbed together for shipment and the corresponding imported products were in a large number of cases sold to different Union customers and partially entered into the stocks of the related importer.
Vendar je bistvenejši mehanizem oblikovanja cen, pri katerem bo osnovna cena, določena s prvotnim cenovnim sporazumom, včasih prilagojena tako, da bo uporabljena dodatna dajatev na zlitine v veljavi v času dostave.
From the opposite point of view, it means that a sale to an unrelated Union customer reported by the related importer during the AIP could be part of one or more direct deliveries from India, from one or more Indian exporting producers of the group, a sale from stock or a combination of both.
Navedeno je v nasprotju s trditvijo, da so cene določene že dolgo pred obdobjem ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije.
These circumstances do not qualify such imports as back to back sales.
Zato je treba zavrniti zahtevek za izključitev prodaje povezanega uvoznika v prvem mesecu obdobja ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije.
More fundamental however is the pricing mechanism where the base price fixed during the initial price agreement will on occasion be adjusted by applying the alloy surcharge in force at the moment of delivery.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je Komisijo pozval, da sprejme popravljen seznam prodajnih transakcij povezanega uvoznika s popravki za vrste izdelkov, opravljenimi na isti način kot popravki, ki so bili opravljeni med preiskavami na kraju samem v Indiji.
That contradicts the statement that prices are fixed well before the AIP.
Trdi, da bi bil to sprejemljiv pristop, ker se vsa prodaja šteje za nakup in prodajo za svoj račun.
As a consequence, the request to eliminate the sales by the related importer of the first month of the AIP has to be rejected.
Komisija ni mogla sprejeti nove predložitve prodajnih transakcij tako pozno v postopku, ker je ni mogla preveriti.
The same exporting producer invited the Commission to accept a reworked listing of sales transactions made by the related importer, corrected for the product types in the same way as the corrections that were made during the on-site investigations in India.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da prodajnih transakcij ni mogoče opredeliti kot nakup in prodajo za svoj račun, kot je navedeno zgoraj.
It argues that such would be an acceptable approach as all sales are back to back.
Poudariti je treba, da je imel proizvajalec izvoznik veliko časa med preiskavami na kraju samem v Indiji (prvi teden marca 2015) in preiskavo na kraju samem pri nemškem povezanem uvozniku (sredi aprila), da predloži popravljen seznam prodaje.
The Commission could not accept a new submission of sales transactions at this late stage of the procedure as it was not in a position to verify this submission.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je pripomnil, da Komisija za določeno vrsto izdelka ni uporabila normalne vrednosti, ugotovljene v prvotni preiskavi.
Moreover, as mentioned above, the investigation showed that the sales transactions cannot be qualified as back to back sales.
Komisija je to pripombo potrdila in popravila stopnje dampinga v preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije z uporabo normalnih vrednosti, kot so bile ugotovljene v prvotni preiskavi.
It should be noted that the exporting producer had ample time between the on-site investigations in India (first week of March 2015) and the on-site investigation at the German related importer (mid-April) to submit revised sales listings.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da so bili njegovi PSA-stroški v višini 5 % določeni naključno, morali pa bi temeljiti na podatkih, zbranih med preiskavo njegovega povezanega uvoznika na kraju samem in ne bi smeli vključevati stroškov prevoza in drugih popustov, ki so bili že odšteti od cen pri nadaljnji prodaji med konstruiranjem izvoznih cen.
The same exporting producer noted that for a particular product type the Commission did not use the normal value established in the original investigation.
Za to trditev je bilo ugotovljeno, da je upravičena, ker so bili v preiskavi na kraju samem ugotovljeni PSA-stroški nižji od višine 5 %, ki se uporablja za izračun dampinga tega proizvajalca izvoznika.