natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 10 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 [2] sets out rules for the granting of advances for direct payments where financial discipline referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] applies in respect of the relevant claim year.
Člen 10 Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 809/2014 [2] določa pravila za dodelitev predplačil za neposredna plačila, kadar se finančna disciplina iz člena 8 Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] uporablja za zadevno leto zahtevka.
In order to ensure the uniform application of those rules in all Member States, it is appropriate to clarify that financial discipline should not be taken into account for the calculation of advances for direct payments, given that the final adjustment rate to be set by 1 December may not yet be known at the moment of paying advances.
Za zagotovitev enotne uporabe navedenih določb v vseh državah članicah je primerno pojasniti, da se finančna disciplina ne bi smela upoštevati pri izračunu predplačil za neposredna plačila, glede na to, da končna prilagoditvena stopnja, ki se določi do 1. decembra, morda še ne bo znana v trenutku izplačila predplačil.
In order to enhance the correctness of the aid application or payment claim, it should be explicitly stated that Member States are able to introduce, on a voluntary basis, a system of ‘preliminary checks’ that will inform beneficiaries about potential non-compliances and will allow them to change their aid applications and payments claim in time in order to avoid reductions and administrative penalties.
Da bi povečali pravilnost vloge za pomoč ali zahtevka za plačilo, bi moralo biti izrecno navedeno, da lahko države članice prostovoljno uvedejo sistem „predhodnih preverjanj“, ki bodo morebitne upravičence obveščala o neskladnosti in jim omogočala, da spremenijo svoje vloge za pomoč in zahtevke za plačilo, da bi preprečili zmanjšanja in upravne kazni.
Full administrative checks will still have to be carried out before payment is made.
Še vedno bo treba pred izvršitvijo plačila opraviti popolne upravne preglede.
In order to avoid a different treatment between farmers of the same Member State, such system should be applied at the Member State level, not at holding level.
Da bi se izognili drugačni obravnavi kmetov v isti državi članici, bi bilo treba tak sistem uporabiti na ravni držav članic in ne na ravni kmetijskih gospodarstev.
Since that system is based on the existence of the geo-spatial aid application, it can only be applied once such a system is fully in place in the Member State concerned.
Ker ta sistem temelji na obstoju geoprostorske vloge za pomoč, se lahko uporabi šele takrat, ko je tak sistem v celoti vzpostavljen v zadevni državi članici.
As the responsibility of submitting a correct aid application or payment claim remains with the beneficiary, any results of ‘preliminary checks’ should be without prejudice to the subsequent results of the administrative cross-checks.
Ker je za predložitev pravilne vloge za pomoč ali zahtevka za plačilo odgovoren upravičenec, kakršni koli rezultati „predhodnih preverjanj“ ne bi smeli vplivati na poznejše rezultate upravnih navzkrižnih preverjanj.
Such system can be applied at regional level provided that the pre-established form and corresponding graphic material referred to in Article 72(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 provided through a GIS-based interface, enabling the processing of the spatial and alphanumerical data of the areas declared, are set up at regional level.
Takšen sistem se lahko uporablja na regionalni ravni pod pogojem, da sta vnaprej pripravljen obrazec in ustrezni grafični prikaz iz člena 72(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 prek vmesnika, temelječega na geografskem informacijskem sistemu (GIS), ki omogoča obdelavo prostorskih in alfanumeričnih podatkov o prijavljenih površinah, uvedena na regionalni ravni.
The possibility that a group of farmers applying for support under some of the rural development measures is treated as the beneficiary (hereinafter referred to as ‘collective’) is relevant especially for agro-environment-climate measures as referred to in Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] implemented at the level of habitat, such as biodiversity and nature conservation measures.
Možnost, da se lahko skupina kmetov, ki zaprosijo za podporo v okviru nekaterih ukrepov za razvoj podeželja, obravnava kot upravičenec (v nadaljnjem besedilu: kolektiv), je pomembna zlasti za kmetijsko-okoljsko-podnebne ukrepe, kot so navedeni v členu 28 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4], ki se izvajajo na ravni habitata, kot so ukrepi za biotsko raznovrstnost in ohranjanje narave.
A legal framework should therefore be provided for the management and control of such collectives.
Zato bi bilo treba zagotoviti pravni okvir za upravljanje in nadzor takih kolektivov.
In order to give further flexibility to those beneficiaries to facilitate a result-oriented approach, Member States should also be given the possibility to combine this system with a system of real-time notification of commitments, where the beneficiaries would notify commitments planned no later than 14 days before they are actually carried out.
Da bi se z dodatno prožnostjo navedenim upravičencem olajšal pristop, usmerjen k rezultatom, bi bilo treba državam članicam dati možnost, da bi ta sistem kombinirale s sistemom obveščanja o obveznostih v realnem času, in sicer kadar bi upravičenci o načrtovanih obveznostih obveščali najpozneje 14 dni, preden se dejansko izvedejo.
Tailor-made checks should complete the mechanism.
Mehanizem bi bilo treba dopolniti z mehanizmom pregledov po meri.
As regards the fulfilment of the greening obligations, beneficiaries need to declare the use of agricultural parcels at the latest by the final date for submission of the single application or aid application as referred to in Article 13 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014.
Kar zadeva izpolnjevanje obveznosti zelene komponente, morajo upravičenci prijaviti uporabo kmetijskih parcel najpozneje do končnega datuma za predložitev zbirne vloge ali zahtevka za pomoč, kot je navedeno v členu 13 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 809/2014.
However, during growing season the beneficiary might need to adapt the cultivation plan as regards the crop or its location.
Vendar pa bo morda moral upravičenec med rastno sezono prilagoditi načrt gojenja v zvezi z rastlinami ali njihovo lokacijo.
Therefore, beneficiaries should be given the possibility to modify, in duly justified circumstances, and for the purpose of the greening only, their declaration with respect to the agricultural parcels declared.
Upravičenci bi morali zato imeti možnost, da v ustrezno utemeljenih okoliščinah in samo za namen zelene komponente svoje izjave o prijavljenih kmetijskih parcelah spremenijo.
This possibility should be applicable provided that it does not have an effect on the status of compliance with the greening obligations with respect to the initial declaration.
To možnost bi bilo treba uporabljati pod pogojem, da to ne vpliva na status izpolnjevanja obveznosti zelene komponente glede na začetno izjavo.
The on-the-spot control sample of beneficiaries who are exempted from the greening requirements is currently not selected according to the sampling methodology via the cascade mechanism as set out in Article 34 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014.
Vzorec upravičencev, pri katerih se opravi pregled na kraju samem in ki so izvzeti iz zahtev zelene komponente, trenutno ni izbran v skladu z metodologijo vzorčenja v okviru kaskadnega mehanizma, kakor je določeno v členu 34 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 809/2014.
As a consequence, it is not counted against the sample of beneficiaries applying for the basic payment scheme or the single area payment scheme, contrary to the sample of beneficiaries who are subject to the greening requirements.
Zato se ne všteva v vzorec upravičencev, ki zaprosijo za shemo osnovnega plačila ali shemo enotnega plačila na površino, v nasprotju s vzorcem upravičencev, za katere veljajo zahteve zelene komponente.
In order to increase the efficiency of the sample selection and to lower the number of beneficiaries to be checked on-the-spot, this sample should be selected according to the same sampling methodology.
Da bi povečali učinkovitost izbora vzorca in zmanjšali število upravičencev, pri katerih je treba opraviti pregled na kraju samem, bi bilo treba ta vzorec izbrati v skladu z enako metodologijo vzorčenja.
The on-the-spot control sample for animal-aid schemes is currently not selected according to the sampling methodology via the cascade mechanism as set out in Article 34 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014.
Vzorec za pregled na kraju samem za shemo pomoči za živali trenutno ni izbran v skladu z metodologijo vzorčenja v okviru kaskadnega mehanizma, kot je določen v členu 34 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 809/2014.
In order to further increase the efficiency of the sample selection and to minimise the number of beneficiaries to be checked on-the-spot, it should be provided that this sample can be selected according to the same sampling methodology.
Da bi dodatno povečali učinkovitost izbire vzorca in zmanjšali število upravičencev, pri katerih je treba opraviti pregled na kraju samem, bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da je ta vzorec lahko izbran v skladu z enako metodologijo vzorčenja.
In order to reduce the administrative burden and to increase the efficiency of the selection of samples for on-the-spot checks, it is appropriate to provide for the explicit possibility for Member States to combine the sample selection for on-the-spot checks under the direct payment schemes and some rural development support measures covered by the integrated administration and control system (‘integrated system’).
Za zmanjšanje upravnega bremena in povečanje učinkovitosti pri izbiri vzorcev za preglede na kraju samem je primerno predvideti izrecno možnost, da države članice kombinirajo izbiro vzorca za preglede na kraju samem v okviru shem neposrednih plačil in nekatere ukrepe podpore za razvoj podeželja, ki jih zajema integrirani administrativni in kontrolni sistem (v nadaljnjem besedilu: integrirani sistem).
As the direct payments and rural development populations do not fully match one to one, Member States need to ensure the representativeness of the resulting samples.
Glede na to, da se populaciji neposrednih plačil in razvoja podeželja ne ujemata popolnoma, morajo države članice zagotoviti reprezentativnost dobljenih vzorcev.
The current rules on the selection of the control sample for the purpose of on-the-spot checks within the integrated system do not include a provision on the type of sampling selection which should apply to the additional beneficiaries to be selected where the ecological focus areas are not identified in the identification system for agricultural parcels.
Sedanja pravila o izbiri kontrolnega vzorca za preglede na kraju samem v okviru v integriranega sistema ne vključujejo določbe o vrsti vzorčenja, ki bi se moralo uporabljati za dodatne upravičence, ki jih je treba izbrati, kadar površine z ekološkim pomenom niso opredeljene v identifikacijskem sistemu za kmetijske parcele.
It is appropriate to provide for that this additional sample is to be selected on the basis of a risk analysis.
Primerno je določiti, da je treba ta dodatni vzorec izbrati na podlagi analize tveganja.
When applying the current provisions on the reduction of the control rate for the purpose of on-the-spot checks within the integrated system in respect of claim years 2015 and 2016, only those Member States which have implemented a voluntary system for the certification of the error rate by their certification body in the last years can actually benefit from a possible reduction of the control rate.
Pri uporabi veljavnih določb o znižanju stopnje kontrole za preglede na kraju samem v okviru integriranega sistema za leti zahtevka 2015 in 2016 imajo samo tiste države članice, ki so uvedle prostovoljni sistem za certificiranje stopnje napake v zadnjih letih pri svojem certifikacijskem organu, dejansko lahko koristi od morebitnega zmanjšanja stopnje kontrole.
For all other Member States, the first opportunity to reduce the control rate starts only as from claim year 2017.
Za vse druge države članice se prva priložnost za zmanjšanje stopnje kontrole začne šele od leta zahtevka 2017.
For that reason, it is appropriate to open the possibility to reduce the control rates for certain direct payments to other Member States that in respect of claim year 2016 certify their error rates in accordance with the new methodology drawn up at Union level taking account of Article 7(4) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 [5] from financial year 2015.
Zato je primerno določiti možnost, da se zmanjšajo stopnje kontrole za nekatera neposredna plačila drugim državam članicam, ki za leto zahtevka 2016 potrdijo svoje stopnje napak v skladu z novo metodologijo, pripravljeno na ravni Unije ob upoštevanju člena 7(4) Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 908/2014 [5] od proračunskega leta 2015.
Article 42 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 sets out rules as regards the on-the-spot checks of livestock aid applications and payment claims under animal-related support measures that are to be carried out during the retention period for animals.
Člen 42 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 809/2014 določa pravila v zvezi s pregledi na kraju samem vlog za pomoč na žival in zahtevkov za plačilo v okviru ukrepov podpore na žival, ki jih je treba opraviti v obdobju obvezne reje živali.
Those rules aim at ensuring that the respect of the retention period obligation can be checked adequately.
Namen navedenih pravil je zagotoviti, da je lahko spoštovanje obveznosti obdobja obvezne reje ustrezno preverjeno.
However, it is appropriate to give Member States the possibility to decide that on-the-spot checks are to be spread where the retention period starts before an aid application or payment claim is submitted or where it cannot be fixed in advance.
Vendar je treba državam članicam dati možnost, da odločijo, ali je treba preglede na kraju samem razporediti, kadar se obdobje obvezne reje začne pred vložitvijo vloge za pomoč ali zahtevka za plačilo ali ga ni mogoče določiti vnaprej.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 809/2014 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
However, taking into account the fact that beneficiaries might need to adapt the cultivation plan as regards the crop or its location in claim year 2015, the provision allowing Member States to authorise the beneficiary to modify the content of the single application as regards the use of the agricultural parcels should apply from 1 January 2015.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
In addition, taking into account the difficulties encountered in claim year 2015 by the Member States having set up such a retention period, the provision allowing to spread on-the-spot checks where the retention period starts before an aid application or payment claim is submitted or where it cannot be fixed in advance should also apply from 1 January 2015.
Člen 1
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Direct Payments and the Rural Development Committee,
Sprememba Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 809/2014
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 809/2014 se spremeni:
Article 1
člen 10 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Amendment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014
„Člen 10
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 is amended as follows:
Predplačila za neposredna plačila
Article 10 is replaced by the following:
Če država članica plača predplačila za neposredna plačila v skladu s členom 75 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013, se prilagoditvena stopnja za finančno disciplino iz člena 8 Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 ne upošteva za izračun navedenih predplačil.
‘Article 10
Pri izplačilu preostalega zneska, ki se upravičencem odobri od 1. decembra, se upošteva prilagoditvena stopnja za finančno disciplino, ki se uporablja za zadevno leto zahtevka za skupni znesek neposrednih plačil v zvezi z navedenim letom.“;
Advances for direct payments
v členu 11 se dodata odstavka 4 in 5:
Where a Member State pays advances for direct payments in accordance with Article 75 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, the adjustment rate for financial discipline referred to in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 shall not be taken into account for calculating those advance payments.
Kadar integrirani sistem določa vnaprej pripravljeni obrazec in ustrezni grafični prikaz iz člena 72(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013, in sicer z vmesnikom, temelječem na geografskem informacijskem sistemu, ki omogoča obdelavo prostorskih in alfanumeričnih podatkov o prijavljenih površinah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: geoprostorski obrazec vloge za pomoč), lahko države članice odločijo uvesti sistem predhodnih navzkrižnih preverjanj (v nadaljnjem besedilu: predhodna preverjanja), ki vključuje vsaj navzkrižna preverjanja iz točk (a), (b) in (c) prvega pododstavka člena 29(1) te uredbe.
The balance payment to be granted to beneficiaries as from 1 December shall take into account the adjustment rate for financial discipline applicable to the relevant claim year for the total amount of direct payments in relation to that year.’
Rezultati se sporočijo upravičencu v 26 koledarskih dneh po končnem roku za predložitev zbirne vloge, vloge za pomoč ali zahtevkov za plačilo iz člena 13 te uredbe.
In Article 11, the following paragraphs 4 and 5 are added:
Če pa to obdobje 26 koledarskih dni poteče pred končnim rokom za sporočanje sprememb v skladu s členom 15(2) te uredbe, se rezultati sporočijo upravičencu najpozneje na koledarski dan po končnem datumu za sporočanje sprememb v zadevnem letu.
Where the integrated system provides for the pre-established form and the corresponding graphic material referred to in Article 72(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 through a GIS-based interface, enabling the processing of the spatial and alphanumerical data of the areas declared (hereinafter referred to as “geo-spatial aid application form”), Member States may decide to introduce a system of preliminary cross-checks (hereinafter referred to as “preliminary checks”), which shall include at least the cross-checks referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 29(1) of this Regulation.
Države članice se lahko odločijo za izvedbo takih predhodnih preverjanj na regionalni ravni, pod pogojem, da se sistem, ki uporablja geoprostorski obrazec vloge za pomoč, vzpostavi na regionalni ravni.
The results shall be notified to the beneficiary within a period of 26 calendar days after the final date of submission of the single application, aid application or payment claims referred to in Article 13 of this Regulation.
Če je upravičenec skupina oseb, ki zaprosijo za podporo za kmetijsko-okoljske-podnebne ukrepe, kot so navedeni v členu 28 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: kolektiv), se države članice lahko odločijo za odstopanje od zahteve iz člena 14 te uredbe, da zahtevek za plačilo vsebuje vse informacije, potrebne za ugotovitev upravičenosti do podpore, in od omejitve iz člena 13 te uredbe, da se vsi ustrezni podatki za pravilno administrativno in finančno upravljanje podpore predložijo do končnega datuma predložitve zahtevka za plačilo, z uvedbo poenostavljenega letnega zahtevka za plačilo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: kolektivni zahtevek), ki ga predloži kolektiv.
However, where this period of 26 calendar days expires before the final date for notification of amendments in accordance with Article 15(2) of this Regulation, the results shall be notified to the beneficiary at the latest the calendar day following the final date for notification of amendments of the year concerned.
Členi 2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 13, 15 in 16, 17(1) in (3) do (9) ter členi 21, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 35, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43 in 45 te uredbe ter členi 4, 12 in 13 Uredbe (EU) št. 640/2014 se smiselno uporabljajo glede na posebne zahteve, določene za kolektivni zahtevek.
Member States may decide to carry-out such preliminary checks at regional level, provided that the system using the geo-spatial aid application form is set up at regional level.
Države članice za kolektive vključijo opis upravnega dogovora v program razvoja podeželja.“;
Where the beneficiary is a group of persons applying for support for agri-environment-climate operations as referred to in Article 28 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 (hereinafter referred to as “collective”), the Member State may decide to derogate from the requirement in Article 14 of this Regulation that the payment claim is to contain all information necessary to establish eligibility for the support and from the restriction in Article 13 of this Regulation that all relevant data for the proper administrative and financial management of the support is to be submitted by the final date of submission of the payment claim, by introducing a simplified annual payment claim (hereinafter referred to as “collective claim”) that shall be submitted by a collective.
v členu 14 se doda naslednji odstavek 4:
Articles 2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 13, 15 and 16, 17(1) and (3) to (9), and Articles, 21, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 35, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43 and 45 of this Regulation and Articles 4, 12 and 13 of Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 shall apply mutadis mutandis in respect of the particular requirements established in view of the collective claim.
Za namen plačila za kmetijske prakse, ki ugodno vplivajo na podnebje in okolje, v skladu s poglavjem 3 naslova III Uredbe (EU) št. 1307/2013 lahko države članice dovolijo upravičencu, da v ustrezno utemeljenih okoliščinah spremeni vsebino zbirnega zahtevka glede uporabe kmetijskih parcel, pod pogojem, da to upravičenca ne postavlja v ugodnejši položaj glede izpolnjevanja obveznosti zelene komponente na podlagi začetne prošnje.
For collectives, Member States shall include a description of the administrative arrangements in the rural development programme.’
Države članice lahko določijo končni rok za sporočanje teh sprememb pristojnemu organu.
In Article 14, the following paragraph 4 is added:
Kadar je pristojni organ upravičenca že obvestil o kakršnem koli primeru neskladnosti v zbirni vlogi ali zahtevku za plačilo, ali je pristojni organ upravičenca obvestil, da namerava opraviti pregled na kraju samem, ali se pri pregledu na kraju samem odkrije kakršna koli neskladnost, spremembe v skladu s prvim pododstavkom niso dovoljene v zvezi s kmetijskimi parcelami, ki jih zadeva neskladnost.“;
For the purpose of the payment for agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment in accordance with Chapter 3 of Title III of Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013, Member States may authorise the beneficiary to modify, in duly justified circumstances, the content of the single application as regards the use of the agricultural parcels, provided that this does not put the beneficiary in a more favourable position with regard to the fulfilment of the greening obligations based on the initial application.
vstavi se naslednji člen 14a:
Member States may decide to set a final date for the notification of these modifications to the competent authority.
„Člen 14a
Where the competent authority has already informed the beneficiary of any case of non-compliance in the single application or payment claim or where it has given notice to the beneficiary of its intention to carry out an on-the-spot check or where an on-the-spot check reveals any non-compliance, modifications in accordance with the first subparagraph shall not be authorised in respect of the agricultural parcels affected by the non-compliance.’
Kolektivni zahtevki
The following Article 14a is inserted:
Kadar država članica uporabi možnost uvedbe kolektivnih zahtevkov, se člen 14 za take kolektivne zahtevke ne uporablja.
‘Article 14a
Kolektiv predloži en kolektivni zahtevek na leto.
Collective claims
Kolektivni zahtevek vsebuje vse informacije, potrebne za ugotovitev upravičenosti do podpore, z izjemo informacij za obveznosti, vključene v kmetijsko–okoljske–podnebne operacije, kot so navedene v členu 28 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013.