natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This company was not able to supply purchase contracts for the production machines for solar modules.
Malezijska družba je na dopis iz člena 28(4) odgovorila z dopisom z dne 14. decembra 2015, v katerem je navedla, da ni želela prikriti trgovinskih vezi s kitajsko družbo in da je obrazec za izvzetje izpolnila v dobri veri.
This company also failed to disclose their relationship to a Chinese exporting producer and the purchases of the product under investigation from the related company.
Navedla je tudi, da so carinski organi države članice po preiskavi sprejeli razlago, da je napačno označene module dejansko proizvedla družba v Maleziji.
In addition, this company provided documents indicating different establishment dates.
Vendar so carinski organi države članice Komisiji potrdili, da zadevni moduli niso bili malezijskega porekla.
The investigation revealed that this company was established in 2013, i.e. after the initiation of the original AD and AS investigations and suspended the production shortly after May 2015, i.e. after the imposition of registration on Malaysian modules.
Malezijska družba je po razkritju trdila, da je Komisija svoj sklep oprla na domneve, predpostavke in lažne obtožbe, pri čemer ni nikoli razkrila njihove morebitne podlage ali dokazov zanje, s čimer je ogrozila pravico družbe do obrambe.
This company claimed, in their reply to the Article 28(4) letter, that most small companies in Malaysia do not have labour contracts for their employees.
Komisiji je zlasti očitala, da ni razkrila spletnega videoposnetka iz uvodne izjave 93 in informacij, ki jih je prejela od carinskih organov države članice, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 94.
In addition, they claimed that they had sufficient capacity to produce the claimed amounts.
Družba je poleg tega trdila, da ni imela povezav s kitajsko družbo in da med preveritvenim obiskom ni prikrila svoje pogodbe s to kitajsko družbo o uporabi blagovne znamke.
The company also argued that they hired sales people from a Chinese company but did not have formal links with this Chinese company.
Glede preiskave carinskih organov države članice je družba trdila, da je bilo blago na koncu v celoti sproščeno kot moduli malezijskega porekla.
These additional explanations were not such that this would lead to a change in the conclusions set out above.
Poleg tega je trdila, da datum njene ustanovitve in dejstvo, da je družba prodajala družbi s sedežem v ZDA, ki je povezana s kitajsko družbo, nista utemeljena argumenta, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče zavrniti izvzetje.
In particular, the company has not demonstrated that it was able to produce the quantities exported.
Ta dodatna pojasnila iz razlogov, ki so navedeni spodaj, niso mogla spremeniti zgoraj navedenih sklepov.
In addition, there was a significant discrepancy between the quantity of imported cells as reported by the company and the quantity of cells reported by its supplier.
Elementi iz uvodne izjave 93 niso bili zgolj domneve in predpostavke, ampak dejstva, ki jim ta družba ni ugovarjala.
Moreover, the fact that they hire staff from the Chinese company confirms the links found with the Chinese company.
Poleg tega so bila ta dejstva družbi predstavljena v dopisu iz člena 28 z dne 3. decembra 2015, v katerem je bila družba tudi pozvana k predložitvi pripomb.
In view of the findings with regard to the change in the pattern of trade and transhipment practices, as set out in section 2, and the findings as set out in the recitals 90 and 91 above, each of which are sufficient on their own, the exemption as requested by this Malaysian company could not be granted in accordance with Article 23(6) of the basic Regulation.
Ugotovitve so bile nato družbi razkrite 22. decembra 2015 in tudi takrat je bila družba pozvana k predložitvi pripomb.
Another company in Malaysia was established in June 2013, i.e. after the initiation of the original AD and AS investigations, and started selling modules from December 2013 onwards, i.e. just after the imposition of definitive anti-dumping and countervailing duties by the original Regulation.
Glede na navedeno je bila pravica do obrambe družbe v celoti upoštevana.
The company produced polycrystalline PV modules during the Reporting Period from cells, which were mainly imported from Taiwan.
Dejstvo ostaja, da je družba med preveritvenim obiskom poskušala, če ne prikriti, pa vsaj zmanjšati pomen svojih gospodarskih vezi, vključno z obstojem pogodbe o uporabi blagovne znamke s kitajsko družbo.
This company appeared to have close ties to a Chinese company, from which an undertaking had been accepted and subsequently withdrawn for violations [12].
Malezijska družba je med preveritvenim obiskom omenila pogodbo o uporabi blagovne znamke kitajske družbe, vendar je izrecno navedla „za določen čas“.
First, the General Manager of the Malaysian company previously occupied a managerial position at the Chinese company.
Pogodba o uporabi blagovne znamke ni bila predložena, prav tako pa na kraju samem ni bilo razkrito, da je bila pogodba podaljšana za nova štiri leta.
Second, cells were initially purchased on many occasions through the Chinese company and/or other Chinese companies whereby the cells physically were transported from a third country (mainly Taiwan) to the PRC, before apparently being transported further to the company located in Malaysia.
Med preveritvenim obiskom ni bil službam Komisije podrobno pojasnjen ali prikazan nobeden od elementov iz uvodne izjave 93, ki so kazali na močne gospodarske vezi med obema družbama.
Third, most modules sold to third countries during the Reporting Period were sold to a US company, which is related to the Chinese company.
Družba tudi ni ugovarjala točnosti teh elementov.
Fourth, the legal representative of the Chinese company was present during the on spot investigation of the Malaysian company.
Člen 23(6) osnovne uredbe določa, da mora za odobritev izvzetja proizvajalec izvoznik dokazati, da ni povezan z nobenim proizvajalcem, za katerega veljajo ukrepi in za katerega se ugotovi, da ni vpleten v izogibanje.
Fifth, sales contracts' templates of both the Chinese and Taiwanese companies appear to be the same, both in terms of layout and substance.
V zvezi s prvim merilom (nepovezanost s proizvajalcem, za katerega veljajo ukrepi) je proizvajalec izvoznik poskušal, če ne prikriti, pa vsaj zmanjšati pomen svojih mnogih vezi s kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, kakor so navedene v uvodni izjavi 93.
Sixth, a representative of the Chinese company stated in an internet video that the Chinese company is providing technical advice and supervision to the Malaysian company.
Vendar pa dokazno breme za neobstoj take povezave nosi proizvajalec izvoznik.
Other elements which were not disclosed by this Malaysian company during the on spot investigation, but were received from the customs authorities of a Member State are the following:
Zaradi nesodelovanja glede te točke in ker ni bilo mogoče preveriti vseh novih informacij, predloženih v odgovor na razkritje, se je morala Komisija pri oceni, ali je proizvajalec izvoznik izpodbil vtis prima facie, da je povezan s kitajsko družbo, zanašati na razpoložljiva dejstva.
The Malaysian company had concluded a brand usage authorisation agreement with the same Chinese company from which an undertaking had been accepted, by which the Malaysian company was authorised to use the Chinese company's brand name, if so requested by customers.
Po mnenju Komisije proizvajalec izvoznik pri tem ni bil uspešen, saj obstajajo številni pokazatelji tesne povezave med njim in kitajsko družbo.
In addition, one of the first customers in the Union was introduced to the Malaysian company by a sales representative of the Chinese company.
V vsakem primeru in tudi, če je bil prvi kriterij quod non izpolnjen, Komisija meni, da drugi kriterij ni bil.
The Malaysian company replied to the Article 28(4) letter by a letter dated 14 December 2015 stating that it had not intended to hide the commercial ties with the Chinese company and that they replied in good faith to the exemption form.
Pomemben pokazatelj vpletenosti v izogibanje, ki je skupen obema načinoma in je nesporno prisoten, je dejstvo, da je proizvajalec izvoznik svojo dejavnost začel po uvedbi prvotnih ukrepov.
They also stated that the customs authorities of a Member State accepted after the investigation that the wrongly labelled modules were actually produced by the company in Malaysia.
Prvič, trditev družbe, da je bilo vse blago iz uvodne izjave 96 sproščeno kot moduli malezijskega porekla, ne drži.
However, the customs authorities of a Member State confirmed to the Commission that these modules were not of Malaysian origin.
Carinski organi države članice so Komisiji predložili informacije, iz katerih je razvidno, da se za te module šteje, da so kitajskega porekla, pri čemer so bile palete zadevnih sončnih modulov označene z imenom kitajske družbe.
After disclosure, the Malaysian company alleged that the Commission based its decision on assumptions, allegations and false accusations, whereby their basis and proof, if at all available, had never been disclosed to them, undermining as such the company's right of defence.
Da se zavaruje potekajoča preiskava te nacionalne carinske uprave, teh informacij ni bilo mogoče razkriti malezijski družbi.
In particular, it criticised the Commission for not having disclosed the internet video referred to in recital 93 and the information received from the customs authorities of a Member State referred to in recital 94.
Vendar pa je Komisija družbo opozorila na možnost, da točnost informacij preveri pooblaščenec za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih, in sicer na podlagi členov 12, 13 in 15 svojega mandata.
The company also argued that it was not related to the Chinese company and that it had not hidden their brand usage authorisation contract with this Chinese company during the verification visit.
Informacije, ki so jih zagotovili carinski organi, dokazujejo pretovarjanje proizvajalca izvoznika, zato so tudi dokaz, da je ta vpleten v izogibanje.
With regard to the investigation of the customs authorities of a Member State, the company argued that finally all goods were released as modules of Malaysian origin.
Drugič, pogodba o uporabi blagovne znamke je bila s kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom sklenjena in podaljšana takrat, ko je kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik izvažal v Unijo v skladu s pogoji zaveze.
Finally it argued that its date of establishment and the fact that the company sold to a company in the United States, which is related to the Chinese company, are not valid arguments on the basis of which the exemption can be denied.
Ta zaveza je med drugim prepovedovala prodajo zadevnega izdelka, proizvedenega v tretji državi, v Unijo, ker bi bil zaradi take prodaje nadzor nad zavezo, zlasti njeno določbo o navzkrižni prodaji, nemogoč ali vsaj močno otežen.
The Malaysian company also requested a hearing with the Hearing Officer in Trade Proceedings, which was held on 12 January 2016.
Besedilo nezaupne različice zaveze je bilo v industriji dobro znano in je bilo pri službah Komisije na voljo na zahtevo.
Prior to that hearing, the internet video was disclosed to the company, which confirmed its accuracy during the hearing.
Poleg tega so bile zaradi njegove tesne gospodarske povezave s kitajskim proizvajalcem zaveze na voljo tudi proizvajalcu izvozniku.
The additional explanations provided by the company were not such as to lead to a change in the conclusion as set out above for the reasons set out below.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je s sklenitvijo pogodbe o uporabi blagovne znamke zaobšel pogoje zaveze in bil tudi na ta način vpleten v izogibanje.
The elements mentioned in recital 93 above are not mere assumptions and allegations, but facts which were as such not questioned by the company.
Med zaslišanjem 12. januarja 2016 je malezijska družba izjavila, da ni predložila napačnih ali zavajajočih informacij in da je dejanska malezijska proizvajalka sončnih modulov.
In addition, these facts were presented to the company in the Article 28 letter of 3 December 2015, in which the company was invited to comment.
V zvezi z dokazi, zbranimi pri nacionalni carinski upravi, ki jih iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov ni bilo mogoče razkriti malezijski družbi, je ta zahtevala, da njihovo točnost preveri pooblaščenec za zaslišanje.
Subsequently, the findings were disclosed to the company on 22 December 2015, on which the company again was invited to comment.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih je pozneje obvestil družbo, da je preveril točnost informacij nacionalne carinske uprave in da je ta na tej podlagi ugotovila, da je bila znatna količina modulov iz te pošiljke kitajskega porekla.
Accordingly, the rights of defence of the company were fully respected.
Zato so bile v skladu s členom 28(1) osnovne uredbe ugotovitve glede te družbe utemeljene z razpoložljivimi dejstvi.
The fact remains that the company at least attempted to minimise, if not to hide, its commercial ties, including the existence of its brand usage authorisation agreement, with the Chinese company during the verification visit.
Glede na ugotovitve v zvezi s spremembami vzorca trgovanja in pretovarjanja, kakor je opisano v oddelku 2 in v uvodnih izjavah 93 do 105, ki se tičejo ugotovitve, da je bila malezijska družba tesno povezana s kitajsko družbo ter da je izvajala pretovarjanje in kršila zavezo, pri čemer vsaka od teh ugotovitev že sama po sebi zadostuje, izvzetja, kakor ga je zahtevala ta malezijska družba, v skladu s členom 23(6) osnovne uredbe ni bilo mogoče odobriti.
Indeed the Malaysian company referred during the on spot verification to a brand usage of the Chinese company, however mentioning explicitly ‘for a limited period’.
Ena družba v Tajvanu ni pravočasno razkrila podrobnih informacij o komercializaciji celic svoje povezane družbe na Kitajskem, ki so bile navedene kot rezalnik, ter podatkov o uvozu, spoštovanja tajvanskih omejitev in natančnih tokov nakupov.
The brand usage contract was neither provided nor was it revealed on spot that this agreement had been renewed for another 4 years.
Vendar so dodatna pojasnila te družbe v odgovor na zahtevo iz člena 28(1) zadostovala za odobritev izjeme tej družbi, saj je predložila zahtevane informacije, ki jih je Komisija lahko preverila.
None of the elements mentioned above in recital 93, which showed strong commercial ties between the two companies, were explained in detail or shown to the Commission services during the verification visit.
Za preostalih pet družb in 21 tajvanskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, vključno z družbo, omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 107, je bilo ugotovljeno, da niso bili vpleteni v izogibanje in je za proizvedene module in celice zato mogoče odobriti izjeme v skladu s členom 23(6) osnovne uredbe.
Also, the accuracy of these elements was not questioned by the company.
Zlasti je bila velika večina teh družb ustanovljena pred uvedbo ukrepov proti LRK.
Article 23(6) of the basic Regulation provides that in order to obtain an exemption, the exporting producer needs to show that it is not related to any producer subject to the measures and not engaged in circumvention practices.
Proizvodni obrati vseh teh družb so bili pregledani na podlagi njihovih izpolnjenih vprašalnikov.
With regard to the first criterion (no relation to a producer subject to the measure), the exporting producer tried to minimise, if not to hide its multiple links with the Chinese exporting producer as set out in recital 93.
Preverjanje statističnih podatkov o proizvodnji in zmogljivosti, stroškov proizvodnje, nabave surovin, polizdelkov in končnih izdelkov ter izvoza v Unijo je potrdilo, da so te družbe dejanske proizvajalke, pri katerih ni bilo dokazov o praksah izogibanja.
However, the burden of proof on the absence of such a link is on the exporting producer.
Drugi proizvajalci, ki se v tem postopku niso javili in v obdobju preiskave niso izvažali izdelka v preiskavi ter nameravajo na podlagi člena 20 in člena 23(6) osnovne uredbe vložiti zahtevek za izvzetje iz razširjene izravnalne dajatve, bodo morali izpolniti obrazec za izvzetje, da bo Komisija lahko ugotovila, ali se jim izvzetje lahko odobri.
Because of the lack of cooperation on this point and the impossibility to verify all the new information submitted in reply to the disclosure, the Commission had to rely on the facts available to assess whether the exporting producer did refute the prima facie impression, on the basis of facts available, that it is related to the Chinese company.
Po razkritju se je več družb javilo in pozdravilo odločitev Komisije, da jih izvzame.
In the view of the Commission, the exporting producer has not succeeded in doing so, as there are multiple indications of a close link between the Chinese company and the exporting producer.
Vendar pa so te družbe tudi opozorile, da se v industriji fotonapetostnih panelov pogosto uporabljajo pogodbe (pogosto imenovane pogodbe s proizvajalci originalne opreme), v skladu s katerimi proizvajalci celic/modulov (pogosto navedeni kot lastniki blagovnih znamk), občasno pošljejo del svojih celic drugim proizvajalcem, da jih sestavijo v module (pogosto navedenim kot proizvajalci originalne opreme).
In any event, and even if the first criterion was met, quod non, the Commission takes the view that the second criterion has not been met.
Te družbe so zahtevale pojasnilo, ali bodo še naprej deležne ugodnosti izjeme, če bodo sklenile tako pogodbo.
The exporting producer has engaged in circumvention in two different manners, each of which is sufficient on its own to reject the request for exemption.
Komisija je potrdila, da v industriji fotonapetostnih panelov take pogodbe, ki jih je pravilneje navajati kot podizvajalske pogodbe, res obstajajo in spadajo na področje uporabe odobrenega podaljšanja.
An important indication of being engaged in circumvention activities, which is common to both manners and is undisputed, is that the exporting producer started its activities after the imposition of the original measures.
V skladu s takimi pogodbami dobavitelje in surovine nadzorujejo lastniki blagovnih znamk;
First, the statement of the company that all goods mentioned in recital 96 were released as modules of Malaysian origin is factually incorrect.
podizvajalec uporablja vzorčni model, ki ga zagotovi lastnik blagovne znamke, pri čemer slednji nadzira proces proizvodnje.
The customs authorities of the Member State provided information to the Commission showing that these modules are considered to be of Chinese origin, whereby the name of the Chinese company was labelled on the pallets of the solar modules in question.
Vendar pa morajo biti celice tudi ob takih pogodbah proizvedene pri izvzetih družbah, kot je navedeno v členu 1(2) spodaj.
In order to protect the ongoing investigation by this national customs administration, this information could not be disclosed to the Malaysian company.
Kadar je izvzetje utemeljeno, se razširjeni veljavni ukrepi ustrezno spremenijo.
However, the Commission drew the attention of the company to the possibility that the Hearing Officer in Trade Proceedings could verify the accuracy of the information, on the basis of Articles 12, 13 and 15 of his terms of reference.
Nato se bo vsako odobreno izvzetje spremljalo, da se zagotovi skladnost z njegovimi pogoji.
The information provided by the customs authorities constitutes proof of transhipment by the exporting producer, and therefore proof that the exporting producer is engaged in circumvention practices.
V tem primeru se šteje, da so za zagotovitev pravilne uporabe takih izvzetij potrebni posebni ukrepi.
Second, the brand usage agreement with the Chinese exporting producer was concluded and prolonged at a point in time when the Chinese exporting producer was exporting to the Union under the terms of an undertaking.
Tak poseben ukrep je zahteva za predložitev veljavnega trgovinskega računa carinskim organom držav članic, ki je skladen z zahtevami iz člena 1(2).
That undertaking prohibited, inter alia, sales to the Union of the product concerned produced in a third country, as that would have rendered supervision of the undertaking, and in particular of its provision on cross-sales, impossible, or at the very least impractical.
Za uvoz, ki ga ne spremlja tak račun, velja razširjena izravnalna dajatev.
The terms of the non-confidential version of the undertaking were well-known in the industry and were made available, upon request, by the Commission services.
RAZKRITJE
Furthermore, due to its close commercial links with the Chinese producer, they were also available to the exporting producer.
Vse zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih so bili oblikovani navedeni sklepi, ter bile pozvane, naj predložijo pripombe.
By entering into the brand usage agreement, the exporting producer circumvented the terms of the undertaking, and engaged also in that manner in circumvention practices.
Upoštevale so se ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile strani.
During the hearing of 12 January 2016, the Malaysian company stated that it had not supplied false or misleading information and that it is a genuine Malaysian manufacturer of solar modules.
Nobeden od predloženih argumentov ni bil osnova za spremembo dokončnih ugotovitev.
Concerning the evidence collected from the national customs administration, which could not be disclosed to the Malaysian company for the reasons set out above, the company requested the Hearing Office to verify its accuracy.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 –
The Hearing Officer in Trade Proceedings subsequently informed the company that he verified the accuracy of the information from the national customs administration and that on this basis the national customs authorities concluded that a significant volume of modules of that shipment was of Chinese origin.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Therefore in accordance with Article 28(1) of the basic Regulation, findings with regard to this company were based on facts available.
Člen 1
In view of the findings with regard to the change in the pattern of trade and transhipment practices, as set out in section 2, and the findings as set out in the recitals 93 to 105 above, relating to finding the Malaysian company having close links to the Chinese company, engaging in transhipment and engaging in a breach of the undertaking, each of which are sufficient on their own, the exemption as requested by this Malaysian company could not be granted in accordance with Article 23(6) of the basic Regulation.
Dokončna izravnalna dajatev, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“, uvedena s členom 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013 na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, razen če so v tranzitu v smislu člena V GATT, se razširi na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic), poslanih iz Malezije ali s Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelki s poreklom iz Malezije in Tajvana ali ne, ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznake KN ex85013100, ex85013200, ex85013300, ex85013400, ex85016120, ex85016180, ex85016200, ex85016300, ex85016400 in ex85414090 (oznake TARIC 8501310082, 8501310083, 8501320042, 8501320043, 8501330062, 8501330063, 8501340042, 8501340043, 8501612042, 8501612043, 8501618042, 8501618043, 8501620062, 8501620063, 8501630042, 8501630043, 8501640042, 8501640043, 8541409022, 8541409023, 8541409032, 8541409033), razen tistih, ki so jih proizvedle spodaj navedene družbe:
One company in Taiwan failed to disclose in due time detailed information about the commercialisation of cells of their related company in China which had been presented as being a wafer slicer, import data, the respect of Taiwanese restrictions and the precise flows of purchases.
Država
Further explanations by this company, following an Article 28(1) request, were however sufficient to grant this company an exemption, as it provided the information requested which could be verified by the Commission.
Družba