natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
a.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino je vložila 39 tožb v zvezi z uveljavljanjem varnega pristana: V 36 zadevah je šlo za domnevne lažne trditve glede certifikacije, v treh zadevah – proti družbam Google, Facebook in Myspace – pa za domnevne kršitve načel zasebnosti varnega pristana [9].
Coverage by the Privacy Shield
Te zadeve dokazujejo izvršljivost certificiranja in posledice neizpolnjevanja.
i.
Odredbe za pridobivanje soglasij v naslednjih dvajsetih letih od družb Google, Facebook in Myspace zahtevajo, da izvajajo celovite programe za varstvo zasebnosti, ki morajo razumno obravnavati tveganja za varstvo zasebnosti, povezana z razvojem in upravljanjem novih in obstoječih proizvodov in storitev, ter za zaščito zasebnosti in zaupnosti osebnih informacij.
b.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino lahko te odločbe uveljavi skozi denarne kazni.
Application of the Notice and Choice Principles
Družba Google je namreč leta 2012 plačala rekordno denarno kazen v višini 22,5 milijona USD za razrešitev obtožb, da je kršila odlok FTC zoper njo.
i.
Posledično pomagajo odloki Zvezne komisije za trgovino ščititi več kot milijardo potrošnikov po vsem svetu, od katerih jih na stotine milijonov prebiva v Evropi.Zadeve Zvezne komisije za trgovino so osredotočene tudi na lažne, goljufive ali zavajajoče trditve glede sodelovanja v varnem pristanu.
A U.S. organization that has received employee information from the EU under the Privacy Shield may disclose it to third parties or use it for different purposes only in accordance with the Notice and Choice Principles.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino takšne trditve jemlje resno.
For example, where an organization intends to use personal information collected through the employment relationship for non-employment-related purposes, such as marketing communications, the U.S. organization must provide the affected individuals with the requisite choice before doing so, unless they have already authorized the use of the information for such purposes.
Na primer, v zadevi Zvezna komisija za trgovino proti Karnani je Zvezna komisija za trgovino leta 2011 vložila tožbo proti spletnemu tržniku v Združenih državah, v kateri je trdila, da je on in njegovo podjetje zavedlo britanske potrošnike, da so verjeli, da ima podjetje sedež v Združenem kraljestvu, tudi z uporabo spletnih pripon.uk in navajanjem britanske valute ter poštnega sistema Združenega kraljestva [10].
Such use must not be incompatible with the purposes for which the personal information has been collected or subsequently authorised by the individual.
Toda ko so potrošniki prejeli izdelke, so naleteli na nepričakovane uvozne dajatve, garancije, ki niso veljale v Združenem kraljestvu, in stroške, povezane s pridobivanjem povračil.
Moreover, such choices must not be used to restrict employment opportunities or take any punitive action against such employees.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino je v obtožbi navedla tudi, da so obtoženi zavajali potrošnike o svojem sodelovanju v programu varnega pristana.
It should be noted that certain generally applicable conditions for transfer from some EU Member States may preclude other uses of such information even after transfer outside the EU and such conditions will have to be respected.
Vsi prizadeti potrošniki so namreč bili v Združenem kraljestvu.Mnoge naše druge zadeve v zvezi z uveljavljanjem varnega pristana so vključevale organizacije, ki so pristopile k programu varnega pristana, vendar niso obnovile svoje certifikacije, obenem pa so se še naprej predstavljale kot aktualne članice.
In addition, employers should make reasonable efforts to accommodate employee privacy preferences.
Kakor je obravnavano spodaj, se Zvezna komisija za trgovino zavezuje tudi k obravnavi lažnih trditev o sodelovanju v okviru zasebnostnega ščita.
This could include, for example, restricting access to the personal data, anonymizing certain data, or assigning codes or pseudonyms when the actual names are not required for the management purpose at hand.
Ta strateška dejavnost pregona bo dopolnila okrepljene ukrepe Ministrstva za trgovino pri preverjanju izpolnjevanja zahtev programa za certifikacijo in ponovno certifikacijo, njegovo spremljanje učinkovitega izpolnjevanja, vključno z uporabo vprašalnikov za sodelujoče v okviru, in okrepljenimi prizadevanji za odkrivanje lažnih trditev glede članstva v okviru in zlorabe morebitne certifikacijske oznake okvira [11].
To the extent and for the period necessary to avoid prejudicing the ability of the organization in making promotions, appointments, or other similar employment decisions, an organization does not need to offer notice and choice.
PREDNOSTNA OBRAVNAVA IN PREISKAVE PREDLOŽITEV
c.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino se tako kot v programu varnega pristana zavezuje, da bo dala prednost zadevam, ki jih države članice EU predložijo v okviru zasebnostnega ščita.
Of course, employers in the European Union must comply with local regulations and ensure that European Union employees have access to such information as is required by law in their home countries, regardless of the location of data processing and storage.
V okviru teh prizadevanj bo Zvezna komisija za trgovino v agenciji imenovala osebo za stike, ki bo sprejemala predložitve držav članic EU.
The Privacy Shield requires that an organization processing such data in the United States will cooperate in providing such access either directly or through the EU employer.
Zelo pripravno je, če organ, ki preloži zadevo, že opravi predhodno preiskavo domnevne kršitve in lahko sodeluje z Zvezno komisijo za trgovino v preiskavi.
d.
Ob prejemu predložitve države članice EU ali organizacije s samourejevalnim sistemom lahko Zvezna komisija za trgovino sprejme vrsto različnih ukrepov za obravnavo sproženih vprašanj.
In so far as personal information is used only in the context of the employment relationship, primary responsibility for the data vis-à-vis the employee remains with the organization in the EU.
Če je glede na število in vrsto prejetih predložitev izvedljivo, bodo zagotovljene informacije vključevale oceno predloženih zadev, vključno z opisom pomembnih vprašanj in morebitnih ukrepov, sprejetih za obravnavo kršitev zakona v okviru pristojnosti Zvezne komisije za trgovino.
It follows that, where European employees make complaints about violations of their data protection rights and are not satisfied with the results of internal review, complaint, and appeal procedures (or any applicable grievance procedures under a contract with a trade union), they should be directed to the state or national data protection or labor authority in the jurisdiction where the employees work.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino bo organu, ki predloži zadevo, zagotovila tudi povratne informacije o vrstah predložitev, ki jih prejme, da bi povečala učinkovitost prizadevanj za obravnavo nezakonitega ravnanja.
This includes cases where the alleged mishandling of their personal information is the responsibility of the U.S. organization that has received the information from the employer and thus involves an alleged breach of the Privacy Shield Principles.
V ustreznih primerih bi to lahko vključevalo izmenjavo informacij in pomoč pri preiskovanju v skladu z ameriškim zakonom o spletni varnosti (U.S. SAFE WEB Act), ki Zvezni komisiji za trgovino dovoljuje, da tujim organom kazenskega pregona nudi pomoč, kadar tuji organ uveljavlja zakone, ki prepovedujejo ravnanje, ki je po vsebini precej podobno ravnanju, prepovedanemu z zakoni, ki jih izvaja Zvezna komisija za trgovino [12].
This will be the most efficient way to address the often overlapping rights and obligations imposed by local labor law and labor agreements as well as data protection law.
V okviru te pomoči lahko Zvezna komisija za trgovino izmenjuje informacije, pridobljene v zvezi z lastno preiskavo, izda prisilni postopek v imenu organa EU za zaščito podatkov, ki izvaja lastno preiskavo, in poišče ustna pričevanja prič ali obtoženih v zvezi z izvršilnim postopkom organa za zaščito podatkov v skladu z zahtevami ameriškega zakona o spletni varnosti (U.S. SAFE WEB Act).
A U.S. organization participating in the Privacy Shield that uses EU human resources data transferred from the European Union in the context of the employment relationship and that wishes such transfers to be covered by the Privacy Shield must therefore commit to cooperate in investigations by and to comply with the advice of competent EU authorities in such cases.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino redno uporablja to pooblastilo za pomoč drugim organom po svetu v zadevah glede zaščite zasebnosti in potrošnikov [13].
e.
Poleg prednostne obravnave zadev, ki jih države članice EU in organizacije s samourejevalnim sistemom za varstvo zasebnosti predložijo v okviru zasebnostnega ščita [14], se Zvezna komisija za trgovino zavezuje preiskati morebitne kršitve okvira na lastno pobudo, kjer je primerno, z različnimi orodji.
Application of the Accountability for Onward Transfer Principle
Zvezna komisija za trgovino že več kot desetletje ohranja trden program preiskovanja zadev glede zasebnosti in varnosti, v katere so vpletene trgovske organizacije.
For occasional employment-related operational needs of the Privacy Shield organization with respect to personal data transferred under the Privacy Shield, such as the booking of a flight, hotel room, or insurance coverage, transfers of personal data of a small number of employees can take place to controllers without application of the Access Principle or entering into a contract with the third-party controller, as otherwise required under the Accountability for Onward Transfer Principle, provided that the Privacy Shield organization has complied with the Notice and Choice Principles.
V okviru teh preiskav je Zvezna komisija za trgovino redno pregledovala, ali se zadevni subjekti predstavljajo v okviru varnega pristana.
Obligatory Contracts for Onward Transfers
Če se je subjekt tako predstavljal in je preiskava razkrila očitne kršitve načel zasebnosti varnega pristana, je Zvezna komisija za trgovino v uvedbo pregona vključila obtožbe kršitev varnega pristana.
a.
S tem dejavnim pristopom bomo nadaljevali tudi v novem okviru.
The purpose of the contract is to make sure that the processor:
Zvezna komisija za trgovino bo iskala morebitne kršitve okvira v sklopu preiskav v zvezi z zasebnostjo in varnostjo, ki jih redno izvajamo.
Because adequate protection is provided by Privacy Shield participants, contracts with Privacy Shield participants for mere processing do not require prior authorization (or such authorization will be granted automatically by the EU Member States), as would be required for contracts with recipients not participating in the Privacy Shield or otherwise not providing adequate protection.
Poleg tega opozarjamo, da v kolikor politika zasebnosti organizacije obljublja, da ta izpolnjuje načela zasebnostnega ščita, in se organizacija ne uspe registrirati pri Ministrstvu za trgovino, to samo po sebi ne oprosti organizacije od uveljavljanja zavez po tem okviru s strani Zvezne komisije za trgovino.
Transfers within a Controlled Group of Corporations or Entities
Zvezna komisija za trgovino potrjuje tudi zavezo, da bo spremljala izvršilnih odlokov in tako zagotovila skladnost z okvirom zasebnostnega ščita.
When personal information is transferred between two controllers within a controlled group of corporations or entities, a contract is not always required under the Accountability for Onward Transfer Principle.
Skladnost z okvirom bomo zahtevali skozi vrsto ustreznih prepovednih določb v prihodnjih odlokih FTC v zvezi z okvirom.
Data controllers within a controlled group of corporations or entities may base such transfers on other instruments, such as EU Binding Corporate Rules or other intra-group instruments (e.g., compliance and control programs), ensuring the continuity of protection of personal information under the Principles.
To vključuje prepoved lažnih navedb v zvezi z okvirom in drugimi programi za varstvo zasebnosti, kadar so te podlaga za ukrep Zvezne komisije za trgovino.
In case of such transfers, the Privacy Shield organization remains responsible for compliance with the Principles.
Zadeve Zvezne komisije za trgovino, ki uveljavljajo prvotni program varnega pristana, so poučne.
For transfers between controllers, the recipient controller need not be a Privacy Shield organization or have an independent recourse mechanism.
Kršitve upravnih odlokov FTC lahko privedejo do denarnih kazni v višini do 16000 ameriških dolarjev za posamezno kršitev ali 16000 ameriških dolarjev na dan za nenehno kršenje [15],ki lahko v primeru ravnanja, ko je prizadeto veliko potrošnikov, znaša tudi več milijonov ameriških dolarjev.
a.
Odloke je treba poslati tudi zaposlenim, ki so odgovorni za zagotavljanje izpolnjevanja odloka.
The Recourse, Enforcement and Liability Principle sets out the requirements for Privacy Shield enforcement.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino sistematično spremlja izpolnjevanje odlokov v okviru varnega pristana kot pri vseh svojih odlokih.
How to meet the requirements of point (a)(ii) of the Principle is set out in the Supplemental Principle on Verification.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino resno jemlje uveljavljanje svojih odlokov v zvezi z varstvom zasebnosti in podatkov ter po potrebi vlaga tožbe za njihovo uveljavitev.
This Supplemental Principle addresses points (a)(i) and (a)(iii), both of which require independent recourse mechanisms.
Na primer, kakor je omenjeno zgoraj, je družba Google plačala denarno kazen v višini 22,5 milijona USD za razrešitev obtožb, da je kršila odlok FTC zoper njo.
These mechanisms may take different forms, but they must meet the Recourse, Enforcement and Liability Principle's requirements.
Pomembno je, da bodo odloki FTC še naprej ščitili vse potrošnike po svetu, ki sodelujejo s podjetjem, ne le tiste potrošnike, ki so vložili pritožbe.
Organizations satisfy the requirements through the following: (i) compliance with private sector developed privacy programs that incorporate the Privacy Shield Principles into their rules and that include effective enforcement mechanisms of the type described in the Recourse, Enforcement and Liability Principle; (ii) compliance with legal or regulatory supervisory authorities that provide for handling of individual complaints and dispute resolution; or (iii) commitment to cooperate with data protection authorities located in the European Union or their authorized representatives.
Nazadnje, Zvezna komisija za trgovino bo še naprej vodila spletni seznam podjetij, za katera veljajo odloki v zvezi z uveljavljanjem programa varnega pristana in novega okvira zasebnostnega ščita [16].
This list is intended to be illustrative and not limiting.
V. SODELOVANJE Z ORGANI ZA ZAŠČITO PODATKOV EU IN PRI UVELJAVLJANJU
The private sector may design additional mechanisms to provide enforcement, so long as they meet the requirements of the Recourse, Enforcement and Liability Principle and the Supplemental Principles.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino priznava pomembno vlogo, ki jo igrajo organi za zaščito podatkov EU glede skladnosti z okvirom, in spodbuja okrepljeno posvetovanje in sodelovanje pri uveljavljanju.
Please note that the Recourse, Enforcement and Liability Principle's requirements are additional to the requirement that self-regulatory efforts must be enforceable under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive acts, or another law or regulation prohibiting such acts.
Poleg morebitnih posvetov z organi za zaščito podatkov v zvezi s posameznimi zadevami, ki jih predložijo ti organi, se Zvezna komisija za trgovino zavezuje k sodelovanju na rednih sestankih z imenovanimi predstavniki delovne skupine iz člena 29, kjer bodo na splošno obravnavani načini za izboljšanje sodelovanja pri uveljavljanju glede na okvir.
c.
FTC bo skupaj s predstavniki Ministrstva za trgovino, Evropske komisije in delovne skupine iz člena 29 sodelovala tudi v letnem pregledu okvira, kjer bo obravnavala njegovo izvajanje.
In order to help ensure compliance with their Privacy Shield commitments and to support the administration of the program, organizations, as well as their independent recourse mechanisms, must provide information relating to the Privacy Shield when requested by the Department.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino spodbuja tudi razvoj orodij, ki bodo okrepila sodelovanje pri uveljavljanju z organi za zaščito podatkov EU in drugimi organi za uveljavljanje varstva zasebnosti po svetu.
The response should address whether the complaint has merit and, if so, how the organization will rectify the problem.
Ta pripomoček GPEN za opozarjanje je lahko posebej uporaben v okviru zasebnostnega ščita.
The Department will protect the confidentiality of information it receives in accordance with U.S. law.
Zvezna komisija za trgovino in organi za zaščito podatkov EU bi ga lahko uporabili za usklajevanje v zvezi z okvirom in drugimi preiskavami varstva zasebnosti, tudi kot izhodišče za izmenjavo informacij za namene zagotavljanja usklajene in učinkovitejše zaščite zasebnosti za potrošnike.
d.
Veselimo se nadaljnjega dela s sodelujočimi organi EU pri širšem vzpostavljanju sistema za opozarjanje GPEN in razvoju drugih orodij za izboljšanje sodelovanja v zadevah uveljavljanja zasebnosti, vključno s tistimi po okviru.
Recourse Mechanisms
Zvezna komisija za trgovino z veseljem potrjuje svojo zavezo k uveljavljanju novega okvira zasebnostnega ščita.
i.
Prav tako se veselimo nadaljnjega sodelovanja s sodelavci iz EU pri zaščiti zasebnosti potrošnikov na obeh straneh Atlantika.
Consumers should be encouraged to raise any complaints they may have with the relevant organization before proceeding to independent recourse mechanisms.
Predsednica
Organizations must respond to a consumer within 45 days of receiving a complaint.
Dodatne informacije o zveznih in državnih zakonih v ZDA glede varstva zasebnosti podajamo v Prilogi A. Poleg tega je povzetek naših nedavnih ukrepov pregona zaradi varstva zasebnosti in varnosti na voljo na spletni stran Zvezne komisije za trgovino na naslovu https://www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy-data-security-update-2015.
Whether a recourse mechanism is independent is a factual question that can be demonstrated notably by impartiality, transparent composition and financing, and a proven track record.
Glej izjavo Zvezne komisije za trgovino o politiki glede goljufij, priloženo Cliffdale Assocs., Inc., 103 F.T.C.
As required by the Recourse, Enforcement and Liability Principle, the recourse available to individuals must be readily available and free of charge to individuals.
110, 174 (1984), na voljo na https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/1983/10/ftc-policy-statement-deception.
Dispute resolution bodies should look into each complaint received from individuals unless they are obviously unfounded or frivolous.
Glej člen 45(n) naslova 15 zakonodajne zbirke ZDA.
In addition, recourse mechanisms should provide individuals with full and readily available information about how the dispute resolution procedure works when they file a complaint.
949, 1070 (1984), na voljo na https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/1980/12/ftc-policy-statement-unfairness.
Such information should include notice about the mechanism's privacy practices, in conformity with the Privacy Shield Principles.
Glej Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, Pritožba v skladu s PIPEDA proti Accusearch, Inc., ki posluje kot Abika.com, https://www.priv.gc.ca/cf-dc/2009/2009_009_0731_e.asp.
They should also cooperate in the development of tools such as standard complaint forms to facilitate the complaint resolution process.
Urad kanadskega pooblaščenca za varstvo zasebnosti je vložil stališče amicus curiae v pritožbi na tožbo Zvezne komisije za trgovino in izvedel lastno preiskavo, v kateri je ugotovil, da je družba Accusearch s svojim ravnanjem kršila tudi kanadsko zakonodajo.
Independent recourse mechanisms must include on their public websites information regarding the Privacy Shield Principles and the services that they provide under the Privacy Shield.
Glej FTC proti Accusearch, Inc., št. 06CV015D (D. Wyo.
This information must include: (1) information on or a link to the Privacy Shield Principles' requirements for independent recourse mechanisms; (2) a link to the Department's Privacy Shield website; (3) an explanation that their dispute resolution services under the Privacy Shield are free of charge to individuals; (4) a description of how a Privacy Shield-related complaint can be filed; (5) the timeframe in which Privacy Shield-related complaints are processed; and (6) a description of the range of potential remedies.
Dec. 20, 2007), aff'd 570 F.3d 1187 (10th Cir.
Independent recourse mechanisms must publish an annual report providing aggregate statistics regarding their dispute resolution services.
2009).
As set forth in Annex I, an arbitration option is available to an individual to determine, for residual claims, whether a Privacy Shield organization has violated its obligations under the Principles as to that individual, and whether any such violation remains fully or partially unremedied.
Glej v zadevi True Ultimate Standards Everywhere, Inc., št.
This option is not available, for example, with respect to the exceptions to the Principles [5] or with respect to an allegation about the adequacy of the Privacy Shield.
C-4512 (F.T.C. Mar. 12, 2015) (sklep in odločba), na voljo na https://www ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/150318trust-edo.pdf.
Individuals and Privacy Shield organizations will be able to seek judicial review and enforcement of the arbitral decisions pursuant to U.S. law under the Federal Arbitration Act.
Glej v zadevi Google, Inc., št.
e.
C-4336 (F.T.C. 13. oktober 2011) (sklep in odločba), na voljo na https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2011/03/ftc-charges-deceptive-privacy-practices-googles-rollout-its-buzz; v zadevi Facebook, Inc., št.
The result of any remedies provided by the dispute resolution body should be that the effects of non-compliance are reversed or corrected by the organization, insofar as feasible, and that future processing by the organization will be in conformity with the Principles and, where appropriate, that processing of the personal data of the individual who brought the complaint will cease.
C-4369 (F.T.C. 30. avgust 2012) (sklep in odredba), na voljo na https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2012/09/ftc-finalizes-privacy-settlement-myspace.
Sanctions need to be rigorous enough to ensure compliance by the organization with the Principles.
Glej FTC proti Karnani, št. 2:09-cv-05276 (C.D. Cal.
A range of sanctions of varying degrees of severity will allow dispute resolution bodies to respond appropriately to varying degrees of non-compliance.
20. maj 2011) (pravnomočni sklep), na voljo na https://www ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cases/2011/06/110609karnanistip.pdf; glej tudi Lesley Fair, FTC Business Center Blog, Around the World in Shady Ways, https://www.ftc.gov/blog/2011/06/around-world-shady-ways (9. junij 2011).
Sanctions should include both publicity for findings of non-compliance and the requirement to delete data in certain circumstances [6].
Pismo vršilca dolžnosti namestnika ministra za mednarodno trgovino Kena Hyatta, Uprava za mednarodno trgovino, Věri Jourovi, komisarki za pravosodje, potrošnike in enakost spolov.
Other sanctions could include suspension and removal of a seal, compensation for individuals for losses incurred as a result of non-compliance and injunctive awards.
Pri ugotavljanju, ali uveljaviti svoje pooblastilo po ameriškem zakonu o spletni varnosti (U.S. SAFE WEB Act), Zvezna komisija za trgovino med drugim upošteva: „(A) ali se je organ, ki predloži zahtevo, strinjal, da zagotovi ali da bo zagotovil vzajemno pomoč komisiji; (B) ali bi izpolnitev zahteve posegla v javni interes Združenih držav; in (C) ali se preiskovalni ali izvršilni postopek organa, ki predloži zadevo, nanaša na dejanja ali ravnanje, ki povzroči ali je verjetno, da bo povzročilo, škodo precejšnjemu številu oseb.“ Člen 46(j)(3) naslova 15 zakonodajne zbirke ZDA.