natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
on the information to be provided by competent authorities to the European Securities and Markets Authority pursuant to Article 67(3) of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
o informacijah, ki jih morajo pristojni organi posredovati Evropskemu organu za vrednostne papirje in trge v skladu s členom 67(3) Direktive 2011/61/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 8 June 2011 on Alternative Investment Fund Managers and amending Directives 2003/41/EC and 2009/65/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009 and (EU) No 1095/2010 [1], and in particular Article 67(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2011/61/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2011 o upraviteljih alternativnih investicijskih skladov in spremembah direktiv 2003/41/ES in 2009/65/ES ter uredb (ES) št. 1060/2009 in (EU) št. 1095/2010 [1] ter zlasti člena 67(5) Direktive,
It is necessary to specify the contents of the information that the competent authorities of Member States have to provide quarterly to the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA) in accordance with Article 67(3) of Directive 2011/61/EU to enable it to evaluate the functioning of the passport for EU alternative investment fund managers (EU AIFMs) managing or marketing EU alternative investment funds (EU AIFs) in the Union, the operating conditions for AIFs and their managers and the potential impact of an extension of the passport.
Podrobneje je treba opredeliti informacije, ki jih morajo pristojni organi držav članic v skladu s členom 67(3) Direktive 2011/61/EU vsako četrtletje posredovati Evropskemu organu za vrednostne papirje in trge (ESMA), da mu omogočijo ocenjevanje delovanja enotne licence za upravitelje alternativnih investicijskih skladov EU (EU UAIS), ki upravljajo ali tržijo alternativne investicijske sklade EU (EU AIS) v Uniji, pogojev poslovanja AIS in njihovih upraviteljev ter možen učinek razširitve enotne licence.
It is important to ensure that information provided by competent authorities is pertinent and capable of supporting an informed assessment.
Pomembno je zagotoviti, da so informacije, ki jih posredujejo pristojni organi, koristne in lahko prispevajo k utemeljeni oceni.
All competent authorities should therefore provide information that allows a consistent assessment throughout the Union, while retaining the possibility to also provide any additional information that they might consider useful for assessing the overall functioning of the EU passport, of the national rules governing private placements, as well as any potential impact of extending the passport to third country funds and managers.
Vsi pristojni organi bi zato morali posredovati informacije, ki omogočajo dosledno oceno v celotni Uniji, pri čemer bi bilo treba ohraniti možnost, da posredujejo tudi dodatne informacije, za katere bi lahko menili, da so koristne za oceno splošnega delovanja enotne licence EU, nacionalnih predpisov, ki urejajo zasebno plasiranje, ter možnega učinka razširitve enotne licence na sklade in upravitelje tretjih držav.
In order to ensure that a uniform set of reporting requirements applies directly to all competent authorities it is necessary to lay down rules on the information to be provided to ESMA in the form of a Regulation.
Za zagotovitev, da enoten sklop zahtev za poročanje velja neposredno za vse pristojne organe, je treba pravila o informacijah, ki jih je treba posredovati ESMA, določiti v obliki uredbe.
In order to assess the use made of the EU passport, it is important to gather quantitative data on AIFMs and AIFs using the passports provided in Articles 32 and 33 of Directive 2011/61/EU, data on the jurisdictions where cross-border activities take place, as well as on the types of cross-border activities.
Za oceno uporabe enotne licence EU je treba zbrati kvantitativne podatke o UAIS in AIS, ki uporabljajo enotne licence, iz členov 32 in 33 Direktive 2011/61/EU, podatke o sodnih pristojnostih, kjer potekajo čezmejne dejavnosti, in podatke o vrstah čezmejnih dejavnosti.
Effective cooperation among competent authorities is an essential aspect of the overall functioning of the EU passport.
Učinkovito sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi je bistven vidik splošnega delovanja enotne licence EU.
To assess effectiveness, it is essential to collect information on the cooperation between competent authorities in executing their responsibilities in accordance with Articles 45 and 50 of Directive 2011/61/EU.
Za oceno učinkovitosti je bistveno zbrati informacije o tem, kako pristojni organi sodelujejo pri izpolnjevanju obveznosti v skladu s členoma 45 in 50 Direktive 2011/61/EU.
This implies assessing the instances when the different competences were triggered, the responsive measures taken, as well as efficacy of cooperation in terms of timing, pertinence and detail.
To pomeni ocenjevanje primerov, ko je bilo treba uporabiti različne pristojnosti, ustreznih ukrepov, ki so bili sprejeti, ter učinkovitosti sodelovanja z vidika časovne razporeditve, koristnosti in podrobnosti.
The EU passport is based on the notification system provided for in Articles 32 and 33 of Directive 2011/61/EU.
Enotna licenca EU temelji na sistemu priglasitev z uradnimi obvestili iz členov 32 in 33 Direktive 2011/61/EU.
Competent authorities should therefore provide information as to the operation of such system, especially in terms of timing, smoothness, quality of information notified and any potential divergences arising from its application.
Pristojni organi bi zato morali posredovati informacije o delovanju takega sistema, zlasti z vidika časovne razporeditve, tekočega delovanja, kakovosti priglašenih informacij in vseh možnih odstopanj zaradi njegove uporabe.
In order to allow for an objective assessment, competent authorities should be required to provide information on the functioning of the passport also from investors' perspective, particularly in terms of impacts on the investor protection.
Da se omogoči objektivna ocena, bi morali pristojni organi zagotoviti informacije o delovanju enotne licence tudi z vidika vlagateljev, zlasti glede učinkov na zaščito vlagateljev.
Competent authorities should also provide information on complaints filed by investors about AIFMs or AIFs established in other Member States than the one where the investor is domiciled, queries from investors related to the distribution of competencies between competent authorities from different Member States and any issues raised in relation to marketing arrangements.
Pristojni organi bi morali posredovati tudi informacije o pritožbah, ki jih vlagatelji vlagajo glede UAIS ali AIS, ustanovljenih v državah članicah, kjer vlagatelj nima stalnega prebivališča, poizvedbah vlagateljev v zvezi z razporeditvijo pristojnosti med pristojnimi organi iz različnih držav članic in vseh vprašanjih, povezanih z ureditvijo trženja.
The assessment of the functioning of the passport needs to take due account of ESMA's role in resolving divergences between competent authorities as regards cross-border management or marketing.
Ocena delovanja enotne licence mora ustrezno upoštevati vlogo ESMA pri reševanju odstopanj med pristojnimi organi glede čezmejnega upravljanja ali trženja.
Competent authorities should therefore communicate their views on the usefulness, the timing, the quality or any other issues related to ESMA's involvement.
Pristojni organi bi zato morali sporočiti svoje mnenje o uporabnosti, časovni razporeditvi, kakovosti ali vseh drugih vprašanjih, povezanih s sodelovanjem ESMA.
To assess the functioning of the current national regimes allowing non-EU AIFMs and non-EU AIFs to operate in individual Member States, it is necessary to be fully aware of the details of the legal frameworks adopted by individual Member States, their specificities and differences as compared to the rules applicable to EU AIFMs and EU AIFs.
Za oceno delovanja veljavnih nacionalnih ureditev, ki ne-EU UAIS in ne-EU AIS omogočajo delovanje v posameznih državah članicah, je treba poznati vse podrobnosti pravnih okvirov, ki so jih sprejele posamezne države članice, njihove posebnosti in razlike v primerjavi s pravili, ki veljajo za EU UAIS in EU AIS.
It is also important to gather quantitative information as to the numbers of non-EU AIFs marketed in Member States and non-EU AIFMs managing or marketing AIFs in Member States.
Pomembno je tudi zbrati kvantitativne informacije o številu ne-EU AIS, ki se tržijo v državah članicah, in ne-EU UAIS, ki upravljajo ali tržijo AIS v državah članicah.
Such information should also contain data on enforcement and supervisory actions, as well as on additional information received from non-EU supervisory authorities upon request.
Take informacije bi morale vključevati tudi podatke o ukrepih izvrševanja in nadzora ter dodatnih informacijah, ki jih na zahtevo predložijo nadzorni organi tretjih držav.
Competent authorities should communicate information on any cooperation arrangements with third country supervisory authorities that are not already known by ESMA following its involvement in the negotiation of multilateral memoranda of understanding.
Pristojni organi bi morali sporočiti informacije o vseh dogovorih o sodelovanju z nadzornimi organi tretjih držav, s katerimi ESMA še ni seznanjen, po njegovem sodelovanju v pogajanjih o večstranskih memorandumih o soglasju.
To be able to assess the operation of cooperation arrangements, it is important to gather information about the effectiveness of such cooperation arrangements, such as quantitative and qualitative information on the use made of the various powers foreseen in those arrangements.
Da bi se lahko ocenilo delovanje dogovorov o sodelovanju, je pomembno zbrati informacije o učinkovitosti takih dogovorov o sodelovanju, kot so kvantitativne in kvalitativne informacije o tem, kako se uporabljajo različna pooblastila, predvidena v navedenih dogovorih.
This includes requests for information, on-site visits and information sharing.
To vključuje zahteve po informacijah, obiskih na kraju samem in izmenjavi informacij.
Effectiveness of cooperation should be assessed in terms of relevance, detail, timing and completeness of the assistance received.
Učinkovitost sodelovanja bi bilo treba oceniti z vidika pomembnosti, podrobnosti, časovne razporeditve in celovitosti prejete pomoči.
Competent authorities should give information on any features of the third country regime that, de facto or de jure, create restrictions or difficulties for the exercise of supervisory functions by the competent authority of a Member State or to the direct receipt of information from non-EU entities.
Pristojni organi bi morali predložiti informacije o vseh značilnostih ureditve tretjih držav, ki dejansko ali pravno povzročajo omejitve ali težave za pristojni organ države članice pri izvajanju nadzornih nalog ali za subjekte tretjih držav pri neposredni predložitvi informacij.
Furthermore, information should be collected on complaints by investors as well as measures taken by the competent authorities in response to such complaints.
Zbrati bi bilo treba tudi informacije o pritožbah vlagateljev in ukrepih, ki jih pristojni organi sprejmejo kot odziv na take pritožbe.
The assessment of the interaction between the two systems established for managing or marketing of AIFs should be based on evidence that reflects the overall situation in the internal market, as well as on short-term and long-term assessments as to the development of the market, including possible market disruptions or distortions of competition.
Ocena povezanosti obeh sistemov, vzpostavljenih za upravljanje ali trženje AIS, bi morala temeljiti na dokazih, ki kažejo splošne razmere na notranjem trgu, ter kratkoročni in dolgoročni oceni razvoja trga, vključno z možnimi ovirami na trgu in izkrivljanjem konkurence.
Assessments should be made on the basis of evidence as to whether there is a level-playing field between Member States and individual third countries, for instance in terms of regulatory burden, conditions of competition or supervision.
Ocene bi bilo treba izvesti na podlagi dokazov o enakih konkurenčnih pogojih za države članice in posamezne tretje države, na primer v smislu regulativne obremenitve, konkurenčnih pogojev ali nadzora.
Competent authorities should provide concrete information as to general or specific issues concerning individual third countries and indicate the source of such issues.
Pristojni organi bi morali posredovati konkretne informacije o splošnih ali posebnih vprašanjih, ki zadevajo posamezne tretje države, in navesti vir takih vprašanj.
When submitting information on possible market disruptions and distortions of competition, competent authorities should take into account all collective investment undertakings and their managers.
Pristojni organi bi morali pri predložitvi informacij o možnih ovirah na trgu in izkrivljanju konkurence upoštevati vse kolektivne naložbene podjeme in njihove upravitelje.
It is important to determine whether, and the extent to which, both EU AIFs and undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities established under Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2], as well as their managers are potentially affected by the introduction of the third country passport.
Pomembno je opredeliti, ali in v kakšnem obsegu bi lahko uvedba enotne licence za tretje države vplivala na EU AIS in kolektivne naložbene podjeme za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje, ustanovljene na podlagi Direktive 2009/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2], ter njihove upravitelje.
This is particularly important given that the definition of non-EU AIFMs in Directive 2011/61/EU covers all collective investment undertakings established in third countries, including those which would have been subject to Directive 2009/65/EC if they had been established in a Member State.
To je zlasti pomembno, ker opredelitev ne-EU UAIS iz Direktive 2011/61/EU zajema vse kolektivne naložbene podjeme, ustanovljene v tretjih državah, vključno s tistimi, za katere bi veljala Direktiva 2009/65/ES, če bi bili ustanovljeni v državi članici.
Furthermore, in order to be able to gauge the overall impact on the market, it is necessary to identify the potential impact on other intermediaries operating in the asset management sector, such as depositaries or service providers,
Poleg tega je treba za izmero splošnega učinka na trg ugotoviti možen učinek na druge posrednike, ki delujejo v sektorju upravljanja premoženja, kot so depozitarji ali ponudniki storitev –
Competent authorities shall pursuant to Article 67(3) of Directive 2011/61/EU provide the following information to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA):
Pristojni organi v skladu s členom 67(3) Direktive 2011/61/EU Evropskemu organu za vrednostne papirje in trge (ESMA) posredujejo naslednje informacije:
information concerning the functioning of the EU passport for EU alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) managing and/or marketing EU alternative investment funds (AIFs), as set out in Articles 2 to 7;
informacije v zvezi z delovanjem enotne licence EU za upravitelje alternativnih investicijskih skladov EU (UAIS), ki upravljajo in/ali tržijo alternativne investicijske sklade EU (AIS), kot je določeno v členih 2 do 7;
information concerning the functioning of the marketing of non-EU AIFs by EU AIFMs in the Member States and the management and/or marketing of AIFs by non-EU AIFMs in the Member States in accordance with the applicable national regimes, as set out in Articles 8 to 13;
informacije v zvezi s tem, kako EU UAIS tržijo ne-EU AIS v državah članicah in kako ne-EU UAIS upravljajo in/ali tržijo AIS v državah članicah v skladu z veljavnimi nacionalnimi ureditvami, kot je določeno v členih 8 do 13;
information concerning the impact of the functioning of the systems referred to in points (a) and (b) of this paragraph, as set out in Article 14.
informacije v zvezi z učinkom delovanja sistemov iz točk (a) in (b) tega odstavka, kot je določeno v členu 14.
With regard to the use made of the passport, the competent authorities shall provide the following information:
V zvezi s tem, kako se uporablja enotna licenca, pristojni organi posredujejo naslednje informacije:
the number of EU AIFMs authorised in accordance with Article 7 of Directive 2011/61/EU;
število EU UAIS, ki imajo dovoljenje v skladu s členom 7 Direktive 2011/61/EU;
the number of EU AIFMs that market units or shares of EU AIFs pursuant to Article 32 of Directive 2011/61/EU, the number of EU AIFs and compartments of AIFs marketed pursuant to Article 32 of Directive 2011/61/EU, and the breakdown by home and host Member State;
število EU UAIS, ki tržijo enote ali deleže EU AIS v skladu s členom 32 Direktive 2011/61/EU, število EU AIS in razdelkov AIS, ki se tržijo v skladu s členom 32 Direktive 2011/61/EU, ter razčlenitev po matičnih državah članicah in državah članicah gostiteljicah;
the number of EU AIFMs that manage EU AIFs pursuant to Article 33 of Directive 2011/61/EU, the number of EU AIFs managed pursuant to Article 33 of Directive 2011/61/EU and the breakdown by home and host Member State;
število EU UAIS, ki upravljajo EU AIS v skladu s členom 33 Direktive 2011/61/EU, število EU AIS, ki se upravljajo v skladu s členom 33 Direktive 2011/61/EU, ter razčlenitev po matičnih državah članicah in državah članicah gostiteljicah;
the number of EU AIFMs that manage EU AIFs established in other Member States pursuant to Article 33 of Directive 2011/61/EU by establishing a branch and the number of EU AIFM that manage directly EU AIFs established in other Member States pursuant to Article 33 of Directive 2011/61/EU.
število EU UAIS, ki v skladu s členom 33 Direktive 2011/61/EU upravljajo EU AIS, ustanovljene v drugi državi članici, z ustanovitvijo podružnice, in število EU UAIS, ki v skladu s členom 33 Direktive 2011/61/EU neposredno upravljajo EU AIS, ustanovljene v drugi državi članici.
With regard to problems encountered regarding effective cooperation among competent authorities, competent authorities shall provide the following information:
V zvezi s težavami, ki so se pojavile glede učinkovitega sodelovanja med pristojnimi organi, pristojni organi posredujejo naslednje informacije:
the number of cases in which a competent authority has notified to the competent authority of the home Member State of an AIFM a situation as described in Article 45(5) of Directive 2011/61/EU, indicating the type of situation;
število primerov, v katerih je pristojni organ uradno obvestil pristojni organ matične države članice UAIS o dogodku iz člena 45(5) Direktive 2011/61/EU, pri čemer navedejo vrsto dogodka;
the number of cases in which a competent authority, after being notified as described in Article 45(5) of Directive 2011/61/EU by the competent authority of the host Member State, has taken the measures set out in Article 45(5) of that Directive, indicating the type of measures taken;
število primerov, v katerih je pristojni organ, ko ga je pristojni organ države članice gostiteljice uradno obvestil, kot je opisano v členu 45(5) Direktive 2011/61/EU, sprejel ukrepe iz člena 45(5) navedene direktive, pri čemer navedejo vrsto sprejetih ukrepov;
the number of cases in which a competent authority, after notifying the competent authority of the home Member State of an AIFM of a situation as described in Article 45(5) of Directive 2011/61/EU, has taken the measures set out in Article 45(6) of that Directive, indicating the type of measures taken;
število primerov, v katerih je pristojni organ, ko je pristojni organ matične države članice UAIS uradno obvestil o dogodku iz člena 45(5) Direktive 2011/61/EU, sprejel ukrepe iz člena 45(6) navedene direktive, pri čemer navedejo vrsto sprejetih ukrepov;
the number of cases in which a competent authority has notified to the competent authority of the home Member State of an AIFM a situation as described in Article 45(7) of Directive 2011/61/EU, indicating the type of situations;
število primerov, v katerih je pristojni organ uradno obvestil pristojni organ matične države članice UAIS o dogodku iz člena 45(7) Direktive 2011/61/EU, pri čemer navedejo vrsto dogodka;
the number of cases in which a competent authority, after being notified as described in Article 45(7) of Directive 2011/61/EU by the competent authority of the host Member State, has taken measures in accordance with Article 45(7) of that Directive, indicating the type of measures taken;
število primerov, v katerih je pristojni organ, ko ga je pristojni organ države članice gostiteljice uradno obvestil, kot je opisano v členu 45(7) Direktive 2011/61/EU, sprejel ukrepe v skladu s členom 45(7) navedene direktive, pri čemer navedejo vrsto sprejetih ukrepov;
the number of cases in which a competent authority, after notifying the competent authority of the home Member State of an AIFM of a situation as described in Article 45(7) of Directive 2011/61/EU, has taken the measures set out in Article 45(8) of that Directive, indicating the type of measures taken;
število primerov, v katerih je pristojni organ, ko je pristojni organ matične države članice UAIS uradno obvestil o dogodku, kot je opisan v členu 45(7) Direktive 2011/61/EU, sprejel ukrepe iz člena 45(8) navedene direktive, pri čemer navedejo vrsto sprejetih ukrepov;
the number of notifications sent and of notifications received under Article 50(5) of Directive 2011/61/EU, indicating the actions taken as a consequence of the notification;
število poslanih in prejetih uradnih obvestil v skladu s členom 50(5) Direktive 2011/61/EU, pri čemer navedejo ukrepe, sprejete na podlagi uradnega obvestila;
as regards the requests for assistance issued by the competent authority:
v zvezi s prošnjami za pomoč, ki jih vložijo pristojni organi:
the number and type of requests,
število in vrsto zahtev,
the number of requests rejected and the reasons for rejection,
število zavrnjenih zahtev in razloge za zavrnitev,
the degree of satisfaction with the assistance received and the difficulties encountered,
stopnjo zadovoljstva s prejeto pomočjo in ugotovljene težave,
the average time for receiving a response;
povprečen čas do prejema odgovora;
as regards the requests for assistance received by the competent authority from competent authorities in other Member States:
v zvezi s prošnjami za pomoč, ki jih pristojni organ prejme od pristojnih organov v drugih državah članicah:
the average time for issuing a response;
povprečen čas, potreben za odgovor;
the number of on-the-spot verifications or investigations that the competent authority has undertaken in another Member State in accordance with Article 54(1) of Directive 2011/61/EU and the number of requests for on-the-spot verifications or investigations in another Member State that were refused.
število preverjanj ali preiskav na kraju samem, ki jih je pristojni organ opravil v drugi državi članici v skladu s členom 54(1) Direktive 2011/61/EU, in število zahtev za preverjanja ali preiskave na kraju samem v drugi državi članici, ki so bile zavrnjene.
With regard to problems encountered regarding the effective functioning of the notification system provided for in Articles 32 and 33 of Directive 2011/61/EU, competent authorities shall provide the following information:
V zvezi z ugotovljenimi težavami glede učinkovitega delovanja sistema priglasitev z uradnimi obvestili iz členov 32 in 33 Direktive 2011/61/EU pristojni organi posredujejo naslednje informacije:
the average time between the receipt of the complete notification file from an AIFM and the moment when the recipient competent authority notifies the competent authority of the host Member State;
povprečni čas med prejemom popolnega uradnega obvestila s strani UAIS in časom, ko pristojni organ prejemnik uradno obvesti pristojni organ države članice gostiteljice;