natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dumping margins were calculated separately for each of the groups.
Zaradi upoštevanja tveganja, da bi glede na poslovne povezave družbe z višjo individualno stopnjo dampinga svoj izvoz usmerile preko družb z nižjo stopnjo dampinga, je bila za obe skupini izračunana enotna tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga, nato pa je bila uvedena enotna stopnja dajatve.
The injury margins for the two groups were higher than the dumping margins.
Komisija je proučila, ali bi domnevna sprememba razmerja povzročila neupravičenost enotne stopnje dajatve.
To take into account the risk that, due to their corporate links, the companies with the higher individual dumping margin could channel their exports through the companies with the lower dumping margin, a single weighted average dumping margin was then calculated for both groups and a single duty rate imposed.
Nato je proučila potrebo po pregledu posameznih stopenj dampinga.
The Commission examined whether the alleged change in the relationship would render the single duty rate to be no longer justified.
Preiskava v zvezi s pregledom je pokazala, da so bile delnice iz uvodne izjave 19 prodane lastniku skupine Gani, zato skupina Wonderful nima več deleža v skupini Gani.
Subsequently, the Commission examined the need for the review of the individual dumping margins.
Nič ni kazalo, da bi imeli skupini kake druge strukturne ali poslovne povezave.
The review investigation revealed that the shares referred to in recital 19 were sold to the owner of the Gani group and the Wonderful group has no longer a stake in the Gani group.
Zato je bila sporočena sprememba razmerja med skupinama sprejeta, skupini Gani in Wonderful pa sta bili od tedaj za namene določitve dajatve obravnavani kot nepovezani.
There were no indications that the two groups would have any other structural or corporate links.
Iz tega sledi, da ni več razlogov za uvedbo enotne stopnje dajatve.
Accordingly, the change of the relationship between the two groups was accepted as claimed and the Gani group and the Wonderful group were considered no longer related for the purposes of specifying the duty.
Namesto tega bi bilo treba za skupini Gani in Wonderful določiti ločeni individualni stopnji dajatve.
It follows that there are no longer reasons for the imposition of a single duty rate.
Glede na potrebo po pregledu individualnih stopenj dampinga, izračunanih za vsako skupino v preiskavi, ki je privedla do uvedbe veljavnih ukrepov, je Komisija ocenila, ali so se okoliščine glede zadevnih skupin toliko spremenile, da je pregled teh individualnih stopenj dampinga upravičen.
Instead, separate individual duty rates should be assigned to the Gani group and the Wonderful group.
V preiskavi, ki je privedla do uvedbe veljavnih ukrepov, je bilo za zadevne družbe ugotovljeno, da:
As to the need for reviewing the individual dumping margins as calculated for each of the groups in the investigation leading to the imposition of the measures in force, the Commission assessed whether the circumstances with regard to the two groups concerned had changed significantly so that it would warrant the review of these individual dumping margins.
niso imele skupnih proizvodnih objektov in naprav;
The investigation leading to the imposition of the measures in force established the following:
niso imele skupnih prodajnih družb in
they did not share production facilities;
niso druga za drugo nastopale kot podizvajalci.
they did not share sales companies; and
Preiskava v zvezi s pregledom je potrdila, da je takšno stanje ostalo nespremenjeno kljub spremembi razmerja.
they did not subcontract for each other.
Glede na te okoliščine je Komisija menila, da prekinitev razmerja ni povzročila spremembe v delovanju nobene od skupin na način, ki bi vplival na izračun njune stopnje dampinga.
The review investigation confirmed that this situation remained unchanged despite the change in relationship.
Zato sprememba teh stopenj dampinga na podlagi novih izračunov po členu 11(3) osnovne uredbe ni upravičena.
In these specific circumstances, the Commission considered that the cessation of the relationship did not change the functioning of each of the the two groups in any way that has a bearing on the calculation of their dumping margins.
Glede na navedeno bi bilo treba kot individualni dajatvi uvesti ločeni stopnji dampinga, izračunani pri prvotni preiskavi.
These dumping margins are 13,9 % for the Gani group and 32,0 % for the Wonderful group.
Skupina Wonderful je trdila, da je Komisijo med preveritvenim obiskom v Ljudski republiki Kitajski seznanila s tem, da so nekateri dokazi, ki jih je v zahtevku za pregled predložila skupina Gani, napačni ali zavajajoči.
These findings were disclosed to interested parties and they were given time to comment.
Poudarila je, da ima Komisija v tovrstnih primerih na voljo člen 18 osnovne uredbe.
The Wonderful group first claimed that they had informed the Commission during the verification visit in the People's Republic of China that some of the evidence submitted by the Gani group in the request for review was false or misleading.
Te informacije potrjujejo, da se je skupina dokončno razcepila, čemur tudi skupina Wonderful ne oporeka.
They pointed out that the Commission has at its disposal Article 18 of the basic Regulation for this type of situation.
Glede na ta dejstva Komisija nima podlage za uporabo člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
They also questioned whether the provisions of Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation had been complied with in t his respect.
Poleg tega našteta dejstva potrjujejo, da je bil člen 11(3) osnovne uredbe upoštevan.
The Commission has verified all the relevant and duly documented evidence collected during the investigation, which showed that the two groups were no longer related to each other, as well as the evidence with regard to the functioning of each of the two groups, both before and after the cessation of the relationship.
Skupina Wonderful je tudi zastavila vprašanje, ali je bila upoštevana določba, da „znesek protidampinške dajatve ne presega ugotovljene stopnje dampinga“ iz člena 9(4) osnovne uredbe, in sicer z utemeljitvijo, da so bile med to preiskavo preverjene nove izvozne cene in normalne vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
This evidence confirms that the group has irrevocably split in two, a fact that is not contested by the Wonderful Group.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 24 do 27, je preiskava pokazala, da prekinitev razmerja ni vplivala na delovanje skupin.
On the basis of these facts, the Commission has no ground for applying Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Kot je tudi pojasnjeno v obvestilu o začetku, v tem primeru niso bile potrebne nove stopnje dampinga.
In addition, these facts confirm that Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation was complied with.
Člen 9(4) osnovne uredbe je bil upoštevan, saj znesek protidampinške dajatve ne presega stopnje dampinga, ki je bila ugotovljena v prvotni preiskavi.
Secondly the Wonderful group questioned whether the provision that ‘the amount of the anti-dumping duty shall not exceed the margin of dumping established’ in Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation has been complied with, on the grounds that new export prices and analogue country normal values were verified during this investigation.
Dejstvo, da so bile v tej preiskavi preverjene tudi nove izvozne cene in normalne vrednosti v primerljivi državi, ne spreminja te ugotovitve.
As set out in recitals 24 to 27 above, the investigation revealed that the functioning of each of the two groups did not change as a result of the cessation of the relationship.
Skupina Wonderful je menila še, da „določitev individualnih stopenj za družbe, ki so bile v preteklosti povezane, vendar je bilo njihovo razmerje prekinjeno“ ustvarja nevaren precedens in skupinam družb omogoča manipulacijo z ukrepi trgovinske zaščite.
As also explained in the Notice of Initiation, in this case no new dumping margins were required.
Komisija se s tem mnenjem ni strinjala.
Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation has been complied with, as the amount of the anti-dumping duty does not exceed the margin of dumping, as established in the original investigation.
Vsak pregled se opravi ločeno na podlagi ugotovitev preiskave, ne na podlagi ugibanj, družbe, ki med seboj niso povezane, pa so upravičene do individualne dajatve, kot je določeno v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
The fact that new export prices and analogue country normal values were also verified during this investigation does not change this conclusion.
Združenje industrije iz Unije Cerame-Unie (CET) je trdilo, da prekinitev delniškega razmerja ne pomeni, da se lahko izključi možnost izogibanja dajatvam preko skupine z najnižjo dajatvijo.
Finally the Wonderful group suggested that ‘giving individual margins to companies which were once related but where that relationship has been ended’ is a dangerous precedent to set and allows for a group of companies to manipulate trade defence measures.
CET je svoje mnenje podprl z ugotovitvijo, da prekinitev razmerja med skupinama časovno sovpada z uvedbo začasnih ukrepov v prvotni zadevi in da skupini pred začetkom prvotne preiskave nista obravnavali prekinitve razmerja.
The Commission disagreed with this suggestion.
V prvotni preiskavi sta bili skupini Gani in Wonderful povezani, zato je CET menil, da je lahko vsaka dostopala tudi do podatkov druge skupine.
Every review is carried out on its own merits as established by the investigation and not on speculation, and where companies are not related to each other they are entitled to their own individual duty as set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar CET ni predložil dokazov, ki bi podprli njegove predpostavke.
The Union industry association Cerame-Unie (CET) argued that the end of the shareholding relationship does not mean that the possibility of circumvention via the group with the lowest duty can be eliminated.
Poleg tega mora Komisija za vsako skupino uvesti individualno dajatev, ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da nista več povezani.
To illustrate this, CET noted that the timing of the two groups being split coincided with the imposition of provisional measures in the original case, and that the two groups did not discuss a split prior to the initiation of the original case.
Komisija nima pravice obravnavati dveh pravno ločenih skupin družb kot povezanih z namenom določitve enotne stopnje dajatve zgolj zato, ker obstaja možnost, da bi skupini sodelovali.
During the original investigation the groups were related and therefore CET submitted that the Gani group and the Wonderful group had access to each other's data.
CET je trdil, da če se poslovne dejavnosti skupin niso spremenile, kakor je bilo razkrito, gotovo tudi tveganje izogibanja ukrepom v okviru skupin ostaja nespremenjeno.
However CET did not provide any evidence to back up these assumptions.
Komisija je ta argument zavrnila.
In addition, the Commission is under an obligation to impose individual duties on each of the two groups now as it has been established that they are no longer related to each other.
Edini razlog, da sta bili skupini v prvotni preiskavi obravnavani kot ena skupina, je bila lastniška povezava, to dejstvo pa zdaj ne obstaja več.
The Commission is not entitled to consider two legally separate company groups as related for the purpose of imposing a single duty rate simply because of the mere possibility that the two groups might collaborate together.
CET je opozoril tudi, da imata skupini proizvodne obrate razmeroma blizu, zaradi česar naj bi bilo fizično izogibanje ukrepom razmeroma preprosto.
CET argued that if the business operations of the two groups have remained unchanged, as has been disclosed, then the risk of circumvention between the two groups must also have remained unchanged.
Komisija je zavrnila tudi ta argument.
The Commission dismissed this argument.
Ni namreč pravne podlage, da bi se nepovezanima družbama naložila enaka dajatev zgolj zaradi dejstva, da se družbi nahajata v relativni bližini in bi bilo zato izogibanje ukrepom preprostejše.
The only reason why the two groups were treated as one in the original investigation was due to the ownership link, and this fact has now disappeared.
V Ljudski republiki Kitajski je običajno, da se številni proizvajalci določenega proizvoda nahajajo v istem mestu ali na istem območju.
CET also noted that the locations of the production facilities of the two companies are relatively close to each other, which would make physical circumvention of the measures relatively simple.
Glede na navedeno pripombe, prejete po razkritju, niso povzročile spremembe ugotovitve, navedene v uvodni izjavi 28.
The Commission dismissed this argument as well.
Zato bi bilo treba kot individualni dajatvi uvesti ločeni stopnji dampinga, izračunani v prvotni preiskavi.
Indeed, there is no legal basis to give unrelated companies the same duty, merely because of the fact that companies are relatively close to each other and therefore circumvention is simpler.
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) osnovne uredbe –
It is common in the People's Republic of China to have many producers of a particular product in one city or area.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
In view of the above, the comments received after disclosure did not change the conclusion as set out in recital 28 above.
Člen 1
Therefore, the separate dumping margins calculated in the original investigation should be imposed as individual duties.
Preglednica iz člena 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 917/2011 se spremeni:
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation,
iz preglednice se črta naslednja vrstica:
Article 1
Dajatev
The table in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 shall be amended as follows:
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
the line below shall be removed from the table:
„Dongguan City Wonderful Ceramics Industrial Park Co., Ltd; Guangdong Jiamei Ceramics Co.
‘Dongguan City Wonderful Ceramics Industrial Park Co., Ltd; Guangdong Jiamei Ceramics Co.
v preglednico se vstavita naslednji vrstici:
Ltd; Qingyuan Gani Ceramics Co.
„Dongguan City Wonderful Ceramics Industrial Park Co., Ltd; Guangdong Jiamei Ceramics Co.
Ltd
Člen 2
the following lines shall be inserted into the table:
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
‘Dongguan City Wonderful Ceramics Industrial Park Co., Ltd; Guangdong Jiamei Ceramics Co.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
Ltd
V Bruslju, 11. marca 2015
Qingyuan Gani Ceramics Co.
Za Komisijo
Ltd; Foshan Gani Ceramics Co.
Predsednik
Ltd
UL L 343, 22.12.2009, str. 51.
Article 2
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 917/2011 z dne 12. septembra 2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz keramičnih ploščic s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 238, 15.9.2011, str. 1).
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
UL C 28, 31.1.2014, str. 11.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/410
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/410
amending Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, glucosamine salt used in the manufacture of food supplements
o spremembi Direktive 2002/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi s (6S)-5-metiltetrahidrofolno kislino, soljo glukozamina, ki se uporablja pri proizvodnji prehranskih dopolnil
Annex II to Directive 2002/46/EC establishes the list of vitamin and mineral substances, and for each of them the forms, which may be used in the manufacture of food supplements.
V Prilogi II k Direktivi 2002/46/ES je določen seznam vitaminskih in mineralnih snovi ter njihovih oblik, ki se lahko uporabljajo za proizvodnjo prehranskih dopolnil.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1170/2009 [2] has replaced Annexes I and II to Directive 2002/46/EC.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1170/2009 [2] je nadomestila prilogi I in II k Direktivi 2002/46/ES.
According to Article 14 of Directive 2002/46/EC, provisions on vitamin and mineral substances in food supplements which may have an effect upon public health are to be adopted after consultation with the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’).
V skladu s členom 14 Direktive 2002/46/ES je treba določbe o vitaminih in mineralih v prehranskih dopolnilih, ki lahko vplivajo na javno zdravje, sprejeti po posvetovanju z Evropsko agencijo za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija).
Following a request for the addition of (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, glucosamine salt as a source of folate to the list set out in Annex II to Directive 2002/46/EC, the Authority adopted on 11 September 2013 a Scientific Opinion on (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, glucosamine salt as a source of folate added for nutritional purposes to food supplements and the bioavailability of folate from this source [3].
Po zahtevku za vključitev (6S)-5-metiltetrahidrofolne kisline, soli glukozamina, kot vira folata na seznam iz Priloge II k Direktivi 2002/46/ES je Agencija 11. septembra 2013 sprejela znanstveno mnenje o (6S)-5-metiltetrahidrofolni kislini, soli glukozamina, kot viru folata, dodani prehranskim dopolnilom za prehranske namene, in o biološki razpoložljivosti folata iz tega vira [3].
It follows from the Authority's opinion that the use of (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, glucosamine salt in food supplements is not of safety concern as a source of folate.
Iz mnenja Agencije sledi, da je uporaba (6S)-5-metiltetrahidrofolne kisline, soli glukozamina, v prehranskih dopolnilih kot vira folata varna.
Following the Authority's favourable opinion, (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, glucosamine salt should be added to the list set out in Annex II to Directive 2002/46/EC.
Po ugodnem mnenju Agencije bi bilo treba (6S)-5-metiltetrahidrofolno kislino, sol glukozamina, dodati na seznam iz Priloge II k Direktivi 2002/46/ES.
ethyltetrahydrofolic acid, glucosamine salt is a novel food ingredient the placing on the market of which has been authorised by Commission Implementing Decision 2014/154/EU [4].
etiltetrahidrofolna kislina, sol glukozamina, je nova živilska sestavina, katere dajanje na trg je bilo odobreno z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2014/154/EU [4].
Interested parties were consulted through the Advisory Group on the Food Chain and Animal and Plant Health and the comments provided were taken into consideration.
Posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi je bilo izvedeno prek svetovalne skupine za prehranjevalno verigo ter zdravje živali in rastlin in izražene pripombe so se upoštevale.
Directive 2002/46/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Direktivo 2002/46/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In Annex II to Directive 2002/46/EC the following point (c) is added in Heading 10 (FOLATE) of Section A:
V Prilogi II k Direktivi 2002/46/ES se v razdelku 10 (FOLAT) oddelka A doda točka (c):
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
V Bruslju, 12. marca 2015
Done at Brussels, 12 March 2015.
Za Komisijo
The President
UL L 183, 12.7.2002, str. 51.
OJ L 183, 12.7.2002, p. 51.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1170/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o spremembi Direktive 2002/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta in Uredbe (ES) št. 1925/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede seznamov vitaminov in mineralov ter njihovih oblik, ki se lahko dodajo živilom, vključno s prehranskimi dopolnili (UL L 314, 1.12.2009, str. 36).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1170/2009 of 30 November 2009 amending Directive 2002/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the lists of vitamin and minerals and their forms that can be added to foods, including food supplements (OJ L 314, 1.12.2009, p. 36).
EFSA Journal 2013;11(10):3358.
EFSA Journal 2013;11(10): 3358.
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2014/154/EU z dne 19. marca 2014 o odobritvi dajanja na trg (6S)-5-metiltetrahidrofolne kisline, soli glukozamina, kot nove živilske sestavine v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 258/97 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 85, 21.3.2014, str. 10).
Commission Implementing Decision 2014/154/EU of 19 March 2014 authorising the placing on the market of (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, glucosamine salt as a novel food ingredient under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 85, 21.3.2014, p. 10).
etiltetrahidrofolna kislina, sol glukozamina“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/415
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/415
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 as regards the extension of the approval periods of the active substances ethephon and fenamiphos
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 540/2011 glede podaljšanja veljavnosti registracije aktivnih snovi etefon in fenamifos
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC [1], and in particular the first paragraph of Article 17 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in razveljavitvi direktiv Sveta 79/117/EGS in 91/414/EGS [1] ter zlasti prvega odstavka člena 17 Uredbe,
Part A of the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 [2] sets out the active substances deemed to have been approved under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Del A Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011 [2] določa aktivne snovi, ki se štejejo kot registrirane v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 12. marca 2015
Done at Brussels, 12 March 2015.
Predsednik
For the Commission
UL L 309, 24.11.2009, str. 1.
The President
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011 z dne 25. maja 2011 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede seznama registriranih aktivnih snovi (UL L 153, 11.6.2011, str. 1).
OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 844/2012 z dne 18. septembra 2012 o opredelitvi določb, potrebnih za izvedbo postopka podaljšanja odobritve aktivnih snovi, kot je določeno z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet (UL L 252, 19.9.2012, str. 26).
ANNEX
v šestem stolpcu vrstice 141 za fenamifos se datum veljavnosti registracije „31. julij 2017“ nadomesti z „31. julij 2018“;
Part A of the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is amended as follows:
v šestem stolpcu vrstice 142 za etefon se datum veljavnosti registracije „31. julij 2017“ nadomesti z „31. julij 2018“.
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 141, fenamiphos, the date of ‘31 July 2017’ is replaced by ‘31 July 2018’;
Registracija aktivnih snovi etefon in fenamifos preneha veljati 31. julija 2017.
in the sixth column, expiration of approval, of row 142, ethephon, the date of ‘31 July 2017’ is replaced by ‘31 July 2018’.
Vložene so bile vloge za podaljšanje odobritev navedenih aktivnih snovi.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/416
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/416
approving dinotefuran as an active substance for use in biocidal products for product-type 18
o odobritvi dinotefurana kot aktivne snovi za uporabo v biocidnih proizvodih 18. vrste proizvodov