natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A clear and workable system is envisaged based on a threshold of the average rate at Union level of decisions granting international protection in the procedures at first instance, as defined by Eurostat, out of the total number at Union level of decisions on applications for international protection taken at first instance, based on the latest available statistics.
Namen začasnih ukrepov je ublažiti občuten pritisk na azilna sistema Italije in Grčije, zlasti s premestitvijo znatnega števila prosilcev, ki bodo na ozemlji Italije in Grčije prispeli po dnevu začetka uporabe tega sklepa ter bodo nedvomno potrebovali mednarodno zaščito.
On the one hand, this threshold would have to ensure, to the maximum extent possible, that all applicants in clear need of international protection would be in a position to fully and swiftly enjoy their protection rights in the Member State of relocation.
Glede na skupno število državljanov tretjih držav, ki so leta 2015 nedovoljeno vstopili v Italijo in Grčijo, ter ob upoštevanju števila tistih, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, bi bilo treba iz Italije in Grčije premestiti skupaj 120000 prosilcev, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito.
On the other hand, it would have to prevent, to the maximum extent possible, applicants who are likely to receive a negative decision on their application from being relocated to another Member State, and therefore from prolonging unduly their stay in the Union.
Glede na zadevne podatke bi bilo treba 13 % teh prosilcev premestiti iz Italije, 42 % iz Grčije, 45 % pa bi jih bilo treba premestiti, kot je določeno v tem sklepu.
A threshold of 75 %, based on the latest available updated Eurostat quarterly data for decisions at first instance, should be used in this Decision.
V treh mesecih po začetku veljavnosti tega sklepa lahko država članica v izjemnih razmerah in na podlagi ustrezno utemeljenih razlogov, ki so skladni s temeljnimi vrednotami Unije, kot so določene v členu 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, Svet in Komisijo uradno obvesti, da ne more sodelovati pri postopku premestitve v višini do 30 % prosilcev, ki so ji dodeljeni v skladu s tem sklepom.
Based on the overall number of third-country nationals who have entered Italy and Greece irregularly in 2015, and the number of those who are in clear need of international protection, a total of 120000 applicants in clear need of international protection should be relocated from Italy and Greece.
Komisija bi morala, po opravljeni oceni, predložiti Svetu predlog za izvedbeni sklep v zvezi z začasno odložitvijo premestitve v višini do 30 % prosilcev, ki so dodeljeni zadevni državi članici.
This number corresponds to approximately 43 % of the total number of third-country nationals in clear need of international protection who have entered Italy and Greece irregularly in July and August 2015.
Kadar je to utemeljeno, lahko Komisija predlaga podaljšanje roka za premestitev prosilcev iz preostale dodelitve do 12 mesecev po trajanju tega sklepa.
The relocation measure foreseen in this Decision constitutes fair burden sharing between Italy and Greece on the one hand and the other Member States on the other, given the overall available figures on irregular border crossings in 2015.
Da bi zagotovili enotne pogoje za izvajanje premestitve v primeru sorazmerne premestitve 54000 prosilcev iz Italije in Grčije v druge države članice v primeru, kadar bi bilo sodelovanje ene ali več držav članic pri premestitvah prosilcev začasno odloženo ali v primeru kadar druga država članica oziroma druge države članice ali pridružene države, potem ko o tem ustrezno uradno obvestijo Svet, sodelujejo pri premestitvi, bi bilo treba na Svet prenesti izvedbena pooblastila.
Given the figures at stake, 13 % of these applicants should be relocated from Italy, 42 % from Greece and 45 % should be relocated as provided for in this Decision.
Prenos teh pooblastil na Svet je utemeljen ob upoštevanju politične občutljivosti takšnih ukrepov, ki posegajo v nacionalna pooblastila v zvezi s sprejemom državljanov tretjih držav na ozemlja držav članic, in potrebe po nagli prilagoditvi hitro spreminjajočim se razmeram.
Within 3 months of the entry into force of this Decision, a Member State may, in exceptional circumstances and giving duly justified reasons compatible with the fundamental values of the Union enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union, notify the Council and the Commission that it is unable to take part in the relocation process of up to 30 % of applicants allocated to it in accordance with this Decision.
Sklad za azil, migracije in vključevanje, ustanovljen z Uredbo (EU) št. 516/2014, podpira ukrepe za delitev bremena, o katerih se dogovorijo države članice, ter je pripravljen upoštevati nov razvoj politik na tem področju.
Such exceptional circumstances include, in particular, a situation characterised by a sudden and massive inflow of nationals of third countries of such a magnitude as to place extreme pressure even on a well prepared asylum system otherwise functioning in line with the relevant Union acquis on asylum or a risk of sudden and massive inflow of nationals of third countries of such a high probability that it warrants an immediate action.
V členu 7(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 516/2014 je določena možnost, da države članice izvedejo ukrepe v zvezi s premestitvijo prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito v okviru svojih nacionalnih programov, v členu 18 navedene uredbe pa možnost plačila pavšalnega zneska 6000 EUR za premestitev vsakega upravičenca do mednarodne zaščite v drugo državo članico.
Following an assessment, the Commission should submit proposals to the Council for an implementing decision regarding a temporary suspension of the relocation of up to 30 % of applicants allocated to the Member State concerned.
Ob spoštovanju načela solidarnosti in pravične delitve odgovornosti ter ob upoštevanju dejstva, da ta sklep pomeni nadaljnji razvoj politike na tem področju, je ustrezno zagotoviti, da države članice, v katere se na podlagi tega sklepa iz Italije in Grčije premestijo prosilci, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, prejmejo pavšalni znesek za vsako premeščeno osebo, ki je enak pavšalnemu znesku iz člena 18 Uredbe (EU) št. 516/2014, tj. 6000 EUR, in se odobri po enakem postopku.
Where justified, the Commission may propose to extend the time limit for relocation of the remaining allocation by up to 12 months beyond the duration of this Decision.
To pomeni omejeno, začasno odstopanje od člena 18 navedene uredbe, ker pavšalni znesek ne bi bil plačan za upravičence do mednarodne zaščite, temveč za premeščene prosilce.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the relocation in the case of proportional relocation of 54000 applicants from Italy and Greece to the other Member States, in the case where the participation of one or more Member States in the relocation of applicants should be suspended, or in the case where, following relevant notifications to the Council, other Member State(s) or Associated States take part in the relocation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Council.
Takšna začasna razširitev kroga morebitnih prejemnikov pavšalnega zneska se dejansko zdi sestavni del programa nujnih premestitev, ki ga uvaja ta sklep.
The conferral of those powers upon the Council is justified in view of the politically sensitive nature of such measures, which touch on national powers regarding the admission of third country nationals on the territory of the Member States and the need to be able to adapt swiftly to rapidly evolving situations.
Poleg tega je glede na stroške za predajo oseb, premeščenih na podlagi tega sklepa, ustrezno zagotoviti, da Italija in Grčija, ob upoštevanju dejanskih stroškov potrebnih za premestitev prosilca na ozemlje države članice premestitve, prejmeta pavšalni znesek v višini vsaj 500 EUR za vsako osebo, premeščeno z njunega ozemlja.
The Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) set up by Regulation (EU) No 516/2014 provides support to burden-sharing operations agreed between Member States, and is open to new policy developments in that field.
Države članice bi morale biti upravičene do dodatnega predhodnega financiranja, ki bi se zagotovilo v letu 2016 po reviziji njihovih nacionalnih programov v okviru Sklada za azil, migracije in vključevanje za izvajanje dejavnosti iz tega sklepa.
Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 516/2014 provides for the possibility for Member States to implement actions related to the transfer of applicants for international protection as part of their national programmes, while Article 18 of that Regulation provides for the possibility of a lump sum payment of EUR 6000 for the transfer of beneficiaries of international protection from another Member State.
Uvesti je treba postopek za hitro premestitev, izvajanje začasnih ukrepov pa morata spremljati tesno upravno sodelovanje med državami članicami in operativna podpora, ki jo zagotavlja EASO.
With a view to implementing the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, and taking into account that this Decision constitutes a further policy development in this field, it is appropriate to ensure that the Member States that relocate, pursuant to this Decision, applicants from Italy and Greece who are in clear need of international protection, receive a lump sum for each relocated person which is identical to the lump sum provided for in Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 516/2014, namely EUR 6000, and is implemented by applying the same procedures.
Nacionalna varnost in javni red bi morala biti upoštevana v celotnem postopku premestitve, dokler ni prosilec dejansko premeščen.
This entails a limited, temporary derogation from Article 18 of that Regulation because the lump sum should be paid in respect of relocated applicants rather than in respect of beneficiaries of international protection.
Kadar ima država članica utemeljene razloge za to, da prosilca šteje za grožnjo za svojo nacionalno varnost ali javni red, bi morala o tem obvestiti druge države članice, in sicer ob polnem spoštovanju temeljnih pravic prosilca, vključno z zadevnimi pravili o varstvu podatkov.
Such a temporary extension of the scope of potential recipients of the lump sum appears indeed to be an integral part of the emergency scheme set up by this Decision.
Pri odločanju o tem, katere prosilce, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, bi bilo treba premestiti iz Italije in Grčije, bi bilo treba dati prednost ranljivim prosilcem v smislu členov 21 in 22 Direktive 2013/33/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7].
Moreover, with regard to the costs for the transfer of persons relocated pursuant to this Decision, it is appropriate to provide that Italy and Greece receive a lump sum of at least EUR 500 for each person relocated from their respective territories, taking into account the actual costs necessary to transfer an applicant to the Member State of relocation.
V zvezi s tem bi se morale prednostno upoštevati vse posebne potrebe prosilcev, vključno s potrebami, povezanimi z zdravjem.
Member States should be entitled to receive additional pre-financing to be paid in 2016 following the revision of their national programmes under the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund to implement actions under this Decision.
Korist otroka bi morala biti vedno najpomembnejše vodilo.
It is necessary to ensure that a swift relocation procedure is put in place and to accompany the implementation of the provisional measures by close administrative cooperation between Member States and operational support provided by EASO.
Integracija prosilcev, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, v družbo gostiteljico je temeljni element pravilno delujočega skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema.
National security and public order should be taken into consideration throughout the relocation procedure, until the transfer of the applicant is implemented.
Zato bi bilo treba pri določanju države članice premestitve posebno pozornost nameniti posebnim kvalifikacijam in značilnostim zadevnih prosilcev, kot so znanje jezikov in druge informacije o posamezniku na podlagi dokazanih družinskih, kulturnih ali socialnih vezi, ki bi lahko olajšale njihovo integracijo v državi članici premestitve.
In full respect of the fundamental rights of the applicant, including the relevant rules on data protection, where a Member State has reasonable grounds for regarding an applicant as a danger to its national security or public order, it should inform the other Member States thereof.
Kar zadeva posebej ranljive prosilce, bi bilo treba upoštevati zmogljivosti države članice premestitve, da tovrstnim prosilcem zagotovi ustrezno pomoč, in potrebo po zagotovitvi pravične porazdelitve teh prosilcev med državami članicami.
When deciding which applicants in clear need of international protection should be relocated from Italy and from Greece, priority should be given to vulnerable applicants within the meaning of Articles 21 and 22 of Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].
Ob doslednem spoštovanju načela nediskriminacije lahko države članice premestitve na podlagi navedenih informacij izrazijo svoje preference glede prosilcev, na osnovi katerih lahko Italija in Grčija po posvetovanju z EASO, po potrebi pa tudi z uradniki za zvezo, pripravita sezname morebitnih prosilcev, določenih za premestitev v posamezno državo članico.
In this respect, any special needs of applicants, including health, should be of primary concern.
Pravni in postopkovni zaščitni ukrepi iz Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013 se še naprej uporabljajo za prosilce, za katere se uporablja ta sklep.
The best interests of the child should always be a primary consideration.
Poleg tega bi morali biti prosilci obveščeni o postopku premestitve iz tega sklepa in seznanjeni z odločitvijo o premestitvi, ki predstavlja odločitev o predaji v smislu člena 26 Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013.
The integration of applicants in clear need of international protection into the host society is the cornerstone of a properly functioning Common European Asylum System.
Ker prosilec v skladu s pravom Unije nima pravice izbrati države članice, ki je odgovorna za obravnavo njegove prošnje, bi moral imeti v smislu Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013 pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva zoper odločitev o premestitvi samo kadar uveljavlja spoštovanje svojih temeljnih pravic.
Therefore, in order to decide which specific Member State should be the Member State of relocation, specific account should be given to the specific qualifications and characteristics of the applicants concerned, such as their language skills and other individual indications based on demonstrated family, cultural or social ties which could facilitate their integration into the Member State of relocation.
Države članice lahko v smislu člena 27 navedene uredbe v nacionalnem pravu določijo, da pritožba zoper odločitev o predaji samodejno ne odloži predaje prosilca, temveč ima zadevna oseba možnost, da zahteva odložitev izvršitve odločitve o predaji, do zaključka obravnave njene pritožbe.
In the case of particularly vulnerable applicants, consideration should be given to the capacity of the Member State of relocation to provide adequate support to those applicants and to the necessity of ensuring a fair distribution of those applicants among Member States.
Prosilci pred predajo državi članici premestitve in po njej uživajo pravice in jamstva iz Direktive 2013/32/EU [8] in Direktive 2013/33/EU [9] Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, tudi v zvezi z njihovimi posebnimi potrebami glede sprejema in postopkovnimi potrebami.
With due respect for the principle of non-discrimination, Member States of relocation may indicate their preferences for applicants based on the above information on the basis of which Italy and Greece, in consultation with EASO and, where applicable, liaison officers, may compile lists of possible applicants identified for relocation to that Member State.
Poleg tega se Uredba (EU) št. 603/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [10] še naprej uporablja za prosilce, za katere velja ta sklep, Direktiva 2008/115/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11] pa se uporablja za vrnitev državljanov tretjih držav brez pravice ostati na ozemlju.
The legal and procedural safeguards set out in Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 remain applicable in respect of applicants covered by this Decision.
Pri tem veljajo omejitve uporabe iz navedenih direktiv.
In addition, applicants should be informed of the relocation procedure set out in this Decision and be notified with the relocation decision which constitutes a transfer decision within the meaning of Article 26 of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013.
V skladu s pravnim redom Unije bi morali Italija in Grčija za postopek premestitve zagotoviti zanesljiv mehanizem za identifikacijo, registracijo in odvzem prstnih odtisov, da bi lahko hitro določili osebe, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito in so upravičene do premestitve ter migrante, ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za mednarodno zaščito in bi jih bilo zato treba vrniti.
Considering that an applicant does not have the right under Union law to choose the Member State responsible for his or her application, the applicant should have the right to an effective remedy against the relocation decision in line with Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, only in view of ensuring respect for his or her fundamental rights.
To bi moralo veljati tudi za osebe, ki so prispele na ozemlji Italije in Grčije med 24. marcem in 25. septembrom 2015, da bi bile tudi te osebe upravičene do premestitve.
In line with Article 27 of that Regulation, Member States may provide in their national law that the appeal against the transfer decision does not automatically suspend the transfer of the applicant but that the person concerned has the opportunity to request a suspension of the implementation of the transfer decision pending the outcome of his or her appeal.
Kadar prostovoljna vrnitev ni mogoča in drugi ukrepi iz Direktive 2008/115/ES ne zadostujejo za preprečitev sekundarnih gibanj, bi bilo treba nemudoma in učinkovito uporabiti ukrepe pridržanja v skladu s poglavjem IV navedene direktive.
Before and after being transferred to the Member States of relocation, applicants enjoy the rights and guarantees provided for in Directive 2013/32/EU [8] and Directive 2013/33/EU [9] of the European Parliament and of the Council, including in relation to their special reception and procedural needs.
Prosilci, ki se izognejo postopku premestitve, bi morali biti iz premestitve izključeni.
In addition, Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10] remains applicable in respect of applicants covered by this Decision, and Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [11] is applicable for the returning of third-country nationals not having the right to remain on the territory.
Sprejeti bi bilo treba ukrepe za preprečevanje sekundarnega gibanja premeščenih oseb iz države članice premestitve v druge države članice, kar bi lahko otežilo učinkovito izvajanje tega sklepa.
The above is subject to the limitations in the application of those Directives.
Države članice bi morale zlasti sprejeti potrebne preventivne ukrepe na področju dostopa do socialnih prejemkov in pravnih sredstev v skladu s pravom Unije.
In line with the Union acquis, a robust mechanism of identification, registration and fingerprinting for the relocation procedure should be ensured by Italy and Greece so as to quickly identify the persons in need of international protection who are eligible for relocation and to identify the migrants who do not qualify for international protection and should therefore be returned.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba prosilce seznaniti s posledicami nedovoljenega nadaljnjega gibanja med državami članicami in dejstvom, da se jim pravice iz naslova mednarodne zaščite, ki jim jo prizna država članica premestitve, priznajo samo v tej državi članici.
This should also apply to persons who arrived on the territory of Italy or Greece between 24 March and 25 September 2015 in order for them to be eligible for relocation.
Poleg tega bi morala v skladu s cilji iz Direktive 2013/33/EU harmonizacija pogojev za sprejem med državami članicami prispevati k omejevanju sekundarnega gibanja prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito, na katero vplivajo različni pogoji za njihov sprejem.
When voluntary return is not practicable and other measures provided for in Directive 2008/115/EC are not adequate to prevent secondary movements, detention measures in line with Chapter IV of that Directive should be applied urgently and effectively.
Države članice bi morale z namenom doseganja enakega cilja razmisliti o uvedbi obveznosti poročanja ter prosilcem za mednarodno zaščito zagotoviti materialne pogoje za sprejem, ki vključujejo nastanitev, hrano in obleko izključno v naravi, po potrebi pa tudi zagotoviti, da se prosilci neposredno predajo državi članici premestitve.
Applicants that elude the relocation procedure should be excluded from relocation.
Prav tako države članice med obravnavo prošenj za mednarodno zaščito, kot je določeno v pravnem redu Unije s področja azila in v schengenskem pravnem redu, razen iz resnih humanitarnih razlogov, prosilcem ne bi smele niti zagotoviti nacionalnih potnih listin niti jim nameniti drugih spodbud, na primer finančnih, ki bi lahko olajšale njihovo nedovoljeno gibanje v druge države članice.
Measures should be taken in order to avoid secondary movements of relocated persons from the Member State of relocation to other Member States which could hamper the efficient application of this Decision.
V primeru nedovoljenega gibanja v druge države članice bi bilo treba od prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito ali upravičencev do nje zahtevati, naj se vrnejo v državo članico premestitve, slednja pa bi morala te osebe nemudoma ponovno sprejeti.
In particular, Member States should take the necessary preventive measures in the field of access to social benefits and legal remedies, in accordance with Union law.
Da bi se izognili sekundarnemu gibanju upravičencev do mednarodne zaščite, bi morale države članice slednje tudi obvestiti o pogojih, pod katerimi lahko zakonito vstopijo v drugo državo članico in tam prebivajo, in bi morale imeti možnost, da uvedejo obveznost poročanja.
In addition, applicants should be informed of the consequences of irregular onward movement within the Member States and of the fact that, if the Member State of relocation grants them international protection, they are entitled to the rights attached to international protection only in that Member State.
V skladu z Direktivo 2008/115/ES bi morale države članice od upravičenca do mednarodne zaščite, ki nezakonito biva na njihovem ozemlju, zahtevati, naj se nemudoma vrne v državo članico premestitve.
Additionally, in line with the objectives set out in Directive 2013/33/EU, the harmonisation of reception conditions amongst Member States should help to limit secondary movements of applicants for international protection influenced by the variety of conditions for their reception.
Če se oseba ne želi vrniti prostovoljno, bi bilo treba zagotoviti prisilno vrnitev v državo članico premestitve.
With a view to reaching the same objective, Member States should consider imposing reporting obligations, and providing applicants for international protection with material reception conditions that include housing, food and clothing only in kind, as well as, where appropriate, ensuring that applicants are directly transferred to the Member State of relocation.
Poleg tega –če tako določa nacionalno pravo – lahko država članica, ki je v primeru prisilne vrnitve v državo članico premestitve uveljavila vrnitev, odloči, da izda prepoved vstopa v državo, s čimer bi upravičencu za določeno obdobje preprečila ponovni vstop na svoje ozemlje.