natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2090
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/2090
amending Decision 2009/790/EC authorising the Republic of Poland to apply a measure derogating from Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
o spremembi Odločbe 2009/790/ES o dovoljenju Republiki Poljski, da uporabi ukrep z odstopanjem od člena 287 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost
Point (14) of Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC authorises the Republic of Poland (‘Poland’) to exempt from value added tax (VAT) taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than the equivalent in national currency of EUR 10000 at the conversion rate on the day of its accession.
Točka 14 člena 287 Direktive 2006/112/ES Republiki Poljski (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Poljska) dovoljuje oprostitev davka na dodano vrednost (DDV) davčnim zavezancem, katerih letni promet ne presega protivrednosti zneska v nacionalni valuti v vrednosti 10000 EUR po menjalnem tečaju na dan njenega pristopa.
By virtue of Council Decision 2009/790/EC [2], Poland was authorised, until 31 December 2012 and as a derogation, to exempt from VAT taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than the equivalent in national currency of EUR 30000 at the conversion rate on the day of its accession (‘the derogating measure’).
Na podlagi Odločbe Sveta 2009/790/ES [2] je lahko Poljska do 31. decembra 2012 kot odstopanje oprostila plačilo DDV davčnim zavezancem, katerih letni promet ni presegal protivrednosti zneska v nacionalni valuti v vrednosti 30000 EUR po menjalnem tečaju na dan njenega pristopa (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ukrep dostopanja).
The derogating measure was subsequently extended by Council Implementing Decision 2012/769/EU [3] until 31 December 2015 and by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1173 [4] until 31 December 2018.
Zatem je bil ukrep odstopanja z Izvedbenim sklepom Sveta 2012/769/EU [3] podaljšan do 31. decembra 2015 in nato z Izvedbenim sklepom Sveta (EU) 2015/1173 [4] do 31. decembra 2018.
In a letter registered with the Commission on 1 June 2016, Poland requested authorisation to increase that threshold from EUR 30000 to EUR 40000.
V dopisu, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 1. junija 2016, je Poljska zaprosila za dovoljenje, da ta prag zviša s 30000 EUR na 40000 EUR.
By means of that increase, an additional number of very small businesses could be exempted from certain or all of the obligations in relation to VAT set out in Chapters 2 to 6 of Title XI of Directive 2006/112/EC.
Na podlagi tega zvišanja bi bilo vseh ali nekaterih obveznosti v zvezi z DDV iz poglavij 2 do 6 naslova XI Direktive 2006/112/ES oproščeno dodatno število zelo malih podjetij.
The burden on the tax authorities with regard to the auditing of very small businesses would therefore also be decreased.
Breme davčnih administracij pri reviziji zelo malih podjetij bi bilo tudi zmanjšano.
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 395(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Commission informed the other Member States, by letters dated 22 September 2016, of the request made by Poland.
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 395(2) Direktive 2006/112/ES je Komisija z dopisi z dne 22. septembra 2016 o zahtevi Poljske obvestila druge države članice.
By letter dated 23 September 2016, the Commission notified Poland that it had all the information necessary to consider the request.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 23. septembra 2016 uradno obvestila Poljsko, da ima na voljo vse informacije, potrebne za presojo prošnje.
The information provided by Poland indicates that potentially 24000 additional taxable persons could make use of the derogating measure in order to reduce their VAT obligations.
Iz informacij, ki jih je predložila Poljska, sledi, da bi ukrep odstopanja lahko uporabilo 24000 dodatnih davčnih zavezancev z namenom zmanjšanja njihovih obveznosti v zvezi z DDV.
Given that an increased threshold will further reduce VAT obligations for very small businesses and that those businesses are still able to opt for the normal VAT arrangements in accordance with Article 290 of Directive 2006/112/EC, Poland should be authorised to apply the increased threshold for the remaining application period of Decision 2009/790/EC, which ends on 31 December 2018.
Odstopanje ne bo vplivalo na lastna sredstva Unije, pridobljena iz DDV, ker bo Poljska izračunala nadomestilo v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1553/89 [5].
However, Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC on a special scheme for small enterprises are subject to review, and a directive amending those Articles might therefore enter into force before that date.
Odločbo 2009/790/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
The derogation will have no impact on the Union's own resources accruing from VAT because Poland will carry out a compensation calculation in accordance with Article 6 of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 [5].
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Decision 2009/790/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Člena 1 in 2 Odločbe 2009/790/ES se nadomestita z naslednjim:
Article 1
„Člen 1
Articles 1 and 2 of Decision 2009/790/EC are replaced by the following:
Z odstopanjem od člena 287 Direktive 2006/112/ES se Republiki Poljski dovoli oprostitev plačila DDV za davčne zavezance, katerih letni promet ne presega protivrednosti zneska v nacionalni valuti v vrednosti 40000 EUR na dan njenega pristopa.
‘Article 1
Člen 2
By way of derogation from Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Republic of Poland is authorised to exempt from VAT taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than the equivalent in national currency of EUR 40000 at the conversion rate on the day of its accession.
Ta odločba se uporablja do začetka veljavnosti direktive o spremembi členov 281 do 294 Direktive 2006/112/ES glede posebne ureditve za mala podjetja ali do 31. decembra 2018, pri čemer se upošteva zgodnejši datum.“
Article 2
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Republiko Poljsko.
This Decision shall apply until the entry into force of a Directive amending Articles 281 to 294 of Directive 2006/112/EC on a special scheme for small enterprises, or until 31 December 2018, whichever is the earlier.’.
V Bruslju, 21. novembra 2016
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Poland.
Za Svet
Done at Brussels, 21 November 2016.
Predsednik
The President
Odločba Sveta 2009/790/ES z dne 20. oktobra 2009 o dovoljenju Republiki Poljski, da uporabi ukrep z odstopanjem od člena 287 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost (UL L 283, 30.10.2009, str. 53).
OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1.
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2012/769/EU z dne 4. decembra 2012 o spremembi Odločbe 2009/790/ES o dovoljenju Republiki Poljski, da uporabi ukrep z odstopanjem od člena 287 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost (UL L 338, 12.12.2012, str. 27).
Council Decision 2009/790/EC of 20 October 2009 authorising the Republic of Poland to apply a measure derogating from Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 283, 30.10.2009, p. 53).
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta (EU) 2015/1173 z dne 14. julija 2015 o spremembi Odločbe 2009/790/ES o dovoljenju Republiki Poljski, da uporabi ukrep z odstopanjem od člena 287 Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost (UL L 189, 17.7.2015, str. 36).
Council Implementing Decision 2012/769/EU of 4 December 2012 amending Decision 2009/790/EC authorising the Republic of Poland to apply a measure derogating from Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 338, 12.12.2012, p. 27).
Uredba Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1553/89 z dne 29. maja 1989 o dokončni enotni ureditvi zbiranja lastnih sredstev, pridobljenih iz davka na dodano vrednost (UL L 155, 7.6.1989, str. 9).
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1173 of 14 July 2015 amending Decision 2009/790/EC authorising the Republic of Poland to apply a measure derogating from Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 189, 17.7.2015, p. 36).
Ker bo višji prag dodatno zmanjšal obveznosti DDV za zelo mala podjetja in ker se slednja v skladu s členom 290 Direktive 2006/112/ES še vedno lahko odločijo za splošno ureditev DDV, bi bilo treba Poljski dovoliti, da višji prag uporablja za nadaljnje omejeno obdobje iz Odločbe 2009/790/ES, ki se konča 31. decembra 2018.
Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 of 29 May 1989 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value added tax (OJ L 155, 7.6.1989, p.
Vendar pa se členi 281 do 294 Direktive 2006/112/ES glede posebne ureditve za mala podjetja pregledujejo, zato bi direktiva o spremembi navedenih členov lahko začela veljati že pred tem datumom.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2091
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/2091
not to identify hexamethylene diacrylate (hexane-1,6-diol diacrylate) (HDDA) as a substance of very high concern pursuant to Article 57(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o neidentifikaciji heksametilen diakrilata (heksan-1,6-diol diakrilat) (HDDA) kot snovi, ki vzbuja veliko zaskrbljenost v skladu s členom 57(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2016) 7524)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2016) 7524)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC [1], and in particular Article 59(9) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH) ter o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije in o spremembi Direktive 1999/45/ES ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 793/93 in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1488/94 ter Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS in direktiv Komisije 91/155/EGS, 93/67/EGS, 93/105/ES in 2000/21/ES [1] ter zlasti člena 59(9) Uredbe,
In accordance with Article 59(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, on 24 August 2015 Sweden submitted to the European Chemicals Agency (‘the Agency’) a dossier in accordance with Annex XV to that Regulation (‘Annex XV dossier’) for the identification of hexamethylene diacrylate (hexane-1,6-diol diacrylate) (HDDA) (EC No 235-921-9, CAS No 13048-33-4) as a substance of very high concern under Article 57(f) of that Regulation.
V skladu s členom 59(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 je Švedska 24. avgusta 2015 Evropski agenciji za kemikalije (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Agencija“) predložila dokumentacijo v skladu s Prilogo XV k navedeni uredbi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: dokumentacija iz Priloge XV) za identifikacijo heksametilen diakrilata (heksan-1,6-diol diakrilat) (HDDA) (št.
The dossier submitter considered that there is scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health due to the skin sensitising properties of HDDA giving rise to an equivalent level of concern to those of other substances listed in points (a) to (c) of Article 57; namely to substances which meet criteria for classification as carcinogenic category 1A or 1B, germ cell mutagenic category 1A or 1B, toxic to reproduction category 1A or 1B.
ES 235-921-9, št.
On 10 December 2015 the Agency's Member State Committee (MSC) adopted its opinion [2] on the Annex XV dossier, following the Agency's general approach for the identification of substances of very high concern under Article 57(f) [3].
CAS 13048-33-4) kot snovi, ki vzbuja veliko zaskrbljenost v skladu s členom 57(f) navedene uredbe.
In its opinion, MSC unanimously acknowledged there is scientific evidence suggesting that HDDA is a strong skin sensitiser.
Vložnik dokumentacije je menil, da obstajajo znanstveni dokazi o verjetnih resnih učinkih na zdravje ljudi zaradi lastnosti HDDA, ki povzročajo preobčutljivost kože in vzbujajo enakovredno raven zaskrbljenosti kot ostale snovi iz točk od (a) do (c) člena 57; namreč snovi, ki izpolnjujejo merila za razvrstitev kot rakotvorne iz kategorije 1A ali 1B, mutagene za zarodne celice iz kategorije 1A ali 1B ali strupene za razmnoževanje iz kategorije 1A ali 1B.
Although a majority of the MSC members considered that HDDA should be identified as a substance of very high concern in accordance with Article 57(f) of that Regulation, the MSC did not reach unanimous agreement.
Odbor držav članic Agencije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: MSC) je 10. septembra 2015 ob upoštevanju splošnega pristopa Agencije za identifikacijo snovi, ki vzbujajo veliko zaskrbljenost v skladu s členom 57(f) [2], sprejel mnenje [3] o dokumentaciji iz Priloge XV.
Three members abstained from a vote, while nine members did not agree that the information provided in the Annex XV dossier was sufficient to constitute an equivalent level of concern to those of other substances listed in points (a) to (e) of Article 57.
V svojem mnenju je MSC soglasno ugotovil, da obstajajo znanstveni dokazi, ki kažejo na to, da je HDDA močan povzročitelj preobčutljivosti kože.
Those nine members stated in their minority opinion that the effects of HDDA on human health cannot be considered as comparable to those substances which are carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction, in terms of both severity and irreversibility.
Čeprav je večina članov MSC menila, da bi bilo HDDA treba opredeliti kot snov, ki vzbuja veliko zaskrbljenost v skladu s členom 57(f) navedene uredbe, MSC ni dosegel soglasnega dogovora.
On 15 January 2016, pursuant to Article 59(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the MSC referred its opinion to the Commission for a decision on the identification of HDDA as a substances for which there is scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health which give rise to an equivalent level of concern to CMR substances (Category 1A or 1B) in accordance with Article 57(f) of that Regulation.
Trije člani so se vzdržali glasovanja, medtem ko se devet članov ni strinjalo, da informacije v dokumentaciji iz Priloge XV zadoščajo, da bi predstavljale enakovredno raven zaskrbljenosti kot ostale snovi iz točk od (a) do (e) člena 57.
The Commission notes that the classification of HDDA as skin sensitiser of category 1 in Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] implies that HDDA and cross-reacting acrylates have the potential to cause severe adverse effects on the skin.
Teh devet članov je v manjšinskem mnenju izjavilo, da učinkov HDDA na zdravje ljudi ni mogoče obravnavati kot primerljivih s snovmi, ki so rakotvorne, mutagene ali strupene za razmnoževanje, tako glede resnosti kot ireverzibilnosti.
The Commission also notes that the sensitisation of skin caused by HDDA is irreversible.
MSC je 15. januarja 2016 v skladu s členom 59(9) Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 sporočil svoje mnenje Komisiji za sprejetje odločitve o identifikaciji HDDA kot snovi, za katero obstajajo znanstveni dokazi o verjetnih resnih učinkih na zdravje ljudi, ki vzbujajo enakovredno raven zaskrbljenosti v skladu s členom 57(f) kot snovi CMR (kategorija 1A ali 1B).
However, although in the cases documented in the Annex XV dossier, moderate and occasionally severe adverse effects on the skin were reported, in all published case reports the skin damage disappeared completely after cessation of exposure and this happened in most cases in a relatively short time.
Komisija ugotavlja, da razvrstitev HDDA kot povzročitelja preobčutljivosti kože iz kategorije 1 v Prilogi VI k Uredbi (ES) št. 1272/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] pomeni, da HDDA in navzkrižno reagirajoči akrilati lahko povzročajo resne škodljive učinke na kožo.
The Commission therefore considers that the scientific evidence presented in the Annex XV dossier does not demonstrate that the probable serious health effects of HDDA are of equivalent concern to those of the substances that are classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction.
Komisija ugotavlja tudi, da je preobčutljivost kože, ki jo povzroča HDDA, ireverzibilna.
This decision is without prejudice to the outcome of any on-going or future assessment within the Agency or the Commission of skin sensitising substances in the context of Article 57(f) and it does not pre-empt the potential identification as SVHC.
Kljub temu, da se je v primerih, dokumentiranih v dokumentaciji iz Priloge XV, poročalo o zmernih in občasno o resnih škodljivih učinkih na kožo, so poškodbe kože po prenehanju izpostavljenosti v vseh objavljenih primerih popolnoma izginile, in sicer v večini primerov v sorazmerno kratkem času.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established under Article 133 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006,
Komisija zato meni, da znanstveni dokazi, predloženi v dokumentaciji iz Priloge XV, ne dokazujejo, da verjetni resni škodljivi učinki HDDA na zdravje vzbujajo enakovredno zaskrbljenost kot snovi, ki so razvrščene kot rakotvorne, mutagene ali strupene za razmnoževanje.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Ta sklep ne posega v izid nobenega tekočega ali prihodnjega ocenjevanja povzročiteljev preobčutljivosti kože v smislu člena 57(f), ki poteka pod okriljem Agencije ali Komisije, in ne preprečuje morebitne identifikacije snovi kot snovi, ki vzbuja veliko zaskrbljenost.
Article 1
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 133 Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 –
The substance hexamethylene diacrylate (hexane-1,6-diol diacrylate) (HDDA) (EC No 235-921-9, CAS No 13048-33-4) is not identified as a substance whose skin sensitising properties cause effects to human health that give rise to an equivalent level of concern pursuant to Article 57(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
This Decision is addressed to the European Chemicals Agency.
Snov heksametilen diakrilat (heksan-1,6-diol diakrilat) (HDDA) (št.
Done at Brussels, 28 November 2016.
ES 235-921-9, št.
For the Commission
CAS 13048-33-4) se ne identificira kot snov, katere lastnosti povzročanja preobčutljivost kože, ki imajo učinke na zdravje ljudi, ki vzbujajo enakovredno raven zaskrbljenosti v skladu s členom 57(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006.
Member of the Commission
Člen 2
OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Evropsko agencijo za kemikalije.
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 353, 31.12.2008, p. 1).
V Bruslju, 28. novembra 2016
Identification of substances as SVHCs due to equivalent level of concern to CMRs (Article 57(f)) — sensitisers as an example
Za Komisijo
http://echa.europa.eu/role-of-the-member-state-committee-in-the-authorisation-process/svhc-opinions-of-the-member-state-committee/-/substance-rev/12301/term
Članica Komisije
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2092
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/2092
amending Decision 2011/163/EU on the approval of plans submitted by third countries in accordance with Article 29 of Council Directive 96/23/EC
o spremembi Sklepa 2011/163/EU o odobritvi načrtov, ki so jih predložile tretje države v skladu s členom 29 Direktive Sveta 96/23/ES
(notified under document C(2016) 7569)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2016) 7569)
Having regard to Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC [1], and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 29(1) and Article 29(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 96/23/ES z dne 29. aprila 1996 o ukrepih za spremljanje nekaterih snovi in njihovih ostankov v živih živalih in v živalskih proizvodih ter razveljavitvi direktiv 85/358/EGS in 86/469/EGS in odločb 89/187/EGS in 91/664/EGS [1] ter zlasti četrtega pododstavka člena 29(1) in člena 29(2) Direktive,
Directive 96/23/EC lays down measures to monitor the substances and groups of residues listed in Annex I thereto.
Direktiva 96/23/ES določa ukrepe za spremljanje snovi in skupin ostankov iz Priloge I k Direktivi.
Article 29 of that Directive requires that third countries from which Member States are authorised to import animals and animal products covered by that Directive submit a residue monitoring plan providing required guarantees (‘the plan’).
Člen 29 navedene direktive zahteva, da tretje države, iz katerih se državam članicam dovoli uvoz živali in živalskih proizvodov, ki jih zajema navedena direktiva, predložijo načrt spremljanja ostankov, ki zagotavlja potrebna jamstva (v nadaljnjem besedilu: načrt).
The plan should at least apply to the groups of residues and substances listed in that Annex I.
Načrt bi se moral uporabljati vsaj za skupine ostankov in snovi iz navedene Priloge I.
Commission Decision 2011/163/EU [2] approves plans submitted by certain third countries concerning specified animal and animal products as listed in the Annex to that Decision.
S Sklepom Komisije 2011/163/EU [2] so bili odobreni načrti, ki so jih predložile nekatere tretje države v zvezi z določenimi živalmi in živalskimi proizvodi, navedenimi v Prilogi k navedenemu sklepu.
In the light of the recent plans submitted by certain third countries and additional information obtained by the Commission from those third countries, it is necessary to update the list of third countries from which Member States are authorised to import certain animals and animal products, as provided for in Directive 96/23/EC, as currently listed in the Annex to Decision 2011/163/EU (‘the list’).
Glede na nedavne načrte, ki so jih predložile nekatere tretje države, in dodatne informacije, ki jih je Komisija pridobila od navedenih tretjih držav, je treba posodobiti seznam tretjih držav, iz katerih je državam članicam dovoljeno uvažati nekatere živali in živalske proizvode, kot določa Direktiva 96/23/ES in ki so trenutno navedeni v Prilogi k Sklepu 2011/163/EU (v nadaljnjem besedilu: seznam).
While the United Arab Emirates have not provided a residue monitoring plan for domestically produced aquaculture, the United Arab Emirates have provided guarantees in respect of aquaculture raw material originating either from Member States or from third countries which are approved to export such raw material to the European Union.
Združeni arabski emirati niso predložili načrta spremljanja ostankov za doma proizvedeno akvakulturo, so pa predložili jamstva glede surovin za akvakulturo, ki izvirajo iz držav članic ali iz tretjih držav, iz katerih je dovoljen izvoz teh surovin v Evropsko unijo.
An entry for the United Arab Emirates for aquaculture with the appropriate footnote should therefore be added in the list.
Zato bi bilo treba na seznam dodati vnos za akvakulturo za Združene arabske emirate z ustrezno opombo.
Gambia is currently included in the list for aquaculture.
Gambija je trenutno vključena na seznam za akvakulturo.
However, Gambia has not provided a plan as required by Article 29 of Directive 96/23/EC and has declared that export to the EU is no longer taking place.
Vendar Gambija ni predložila načrta, kakor zahteva člen 29 Direktive 96/23/ES, in je izjavila, da izvoz v EU ne poteka več.
The entry for that third country concerning aquaculture should therefore be deleted from the list.
Vnos za navedeno tretjo državo glede akvakulture bi bilo zato treba črtati s seznama.
Georgia has submitted a plan for honey to the Commission.
Gruzija je Komisiji predložila načrt za med.
An entry for Georgia for honey should therefore be included in the list.
Zato bi bilo treba vnos za med za Gruzijo vključiti na seznam.
Kenya is currently included in the list for milk.
Kenija je trenutno vključena na seznam za mleko.