natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the fee paid by Propapier includes operating costs, maintenance and repair costs, personnel and charge management costs, imputed depreciation, and also imputed interest on 20 % of the investment capital invested in the waste water treatment; it thus covers all incremental costs incurred by the operator of the waste water treatment plant in relation to the activity of Propapier.
Infrastrukturni ukrepi, ki jih je izvedla Nemčija, niso namenska infrastruktura za podjetje Propapier PM2 GmbH.
As regards the reasonable profit margin that the user fees should cover in addition to the incremental costs, the charges in the present case cover not only the incremental costs but also imputed interest on 20 % of the investment capital.
Pristojbine, ki jih TAZV zaračunava podjetju Propapier za uporabo čistilne naprave odpadnih voda, ne vključujejo državne pomoči.
Whereas this is not expressly identified as reasonable profit for the purposes of the incremental cost approach defined above, it provides the operator with additional income just as a reasonable profit would do.
Zato infrastrukturni ukrepi in predpisi o določitvi pristojbine ne pomenijo pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Given that the fee does not confer an advantage and therefore does not constitute State aid, it was not necessary for the Commission to evaluate the question whether or not the fees constitute existing aid (see recitals 123 to 137) or operating aid (see recital 26), or to address the issue of compatibility of such operating aid with the internal market.
Člen 2
In view of this finding, the Commission can also leave open the question whether or not recovery of the fees (had they been found to constitute operating aid) would be contrary to the principles of legitimate expectations and equal treatment.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo.
CONCLUSION
V Bruslju, 1. oktobra 2014
The Commission thus concludes that neither the construction of the TAZV waste water treatment plant, nor the construction of the car park, nor the new road, nor the widening and deepening of the Oder-Spree Canal constitute dedicated infrastructure.
Za Komisijo
The Commission also concludes that the waste water treatment fees do not contain State aid.
Podpredsednik
The market investor/operator principle is satisfied and therefore no economic advantage is provided for Propapier PM2 GmbH,
UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
1.
Article 1
UL C 7, 12.1.2011, str.
The infrastructure measures implemented by Germany do not constitute dedicated infrastructure for Propapier PM2 GmbH.
10.
The fees charged by TAZV to Propapier for the use of the waste water treatment plant do not involve State aid.
Glej opombo 2.
Therefore, the infrastructure measures and fee setting rules do not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Odločba Komisije v zadevi državne pomoči N 582/07 (UL C 131, 29.5.2008, str.
Article 2
6).
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Splošno sodišče je po izpodbijanju konkurenta Smurfit Kappa to odločbo Komisije razveljavilo s sodbo z dne 10. julija 2012 v zadevi T-304/08, Smurfit Kappa Group plc proti Komisiji.
Done at Brussels, 1 October 2014.
Komisija je 15. maja 2013 začela formalni postopek preiskave priglašene regionalne pomoči za podjetje Propapier (zadeva državne pomoči SA.23827 (2013/C) (UL C 230, 8.8.2013, str.
For the Commission
39)).
OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p.
Nemčija je v pripombi z dne 15. maja 2013 navedla, da je bilo za upravičene stroške v višini 38561588 EUR izplačanih 30849271 EUR.
OJ C 7, 12.1.2011, p.
Odločba Komisije C(2003) 1999 z dne 9. julija 2003 v zadevi državne pomoči N 644e/02 (UL C 197, 21.8.2003, str.
10.
12).
Cf. footnote 2.
Veljavna različica v času sklepa o začetku postopka je bil zakon KAG Brandenburg z dne 31. marca 2004 (GVBI.I/04, št. 08, str.
Commission decision in State aid case N 582/07 (OJ C 131, 29.5.2008, p.
174), kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen s členom 1 zakona z dne 27. maja 2009 (GVBI.I/09, št. 07, str.
After a challenge by competitor Smurfit Kappa, the General Court annulled the Commission decision by judgment of 10 July 2012 in Case T-304/08 Smurfit Kappa Group plc v Commission.
V sklepu o začetku postopka sta izčrpno obravnavani evropska in nemška zakonodaja na področju čiščenja odpadnih voda, tj. Direktiva Sveta 91/271/EGS z dne 21. maja 1991 o čiščenju komunalne odpadne vode (UL L 135, 30.5.1991, str.
On 15 May 2013 the Commission opened a formal investigation into the notified regional aid granted to Propapier (State aid case SA.23827 (2013/C), OJ C 230, 8.8.2013, p.
40), Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/60/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike (UL L 327, 22.12.2000, str.
39).
1), nemški zvezni zakon o vodah (Wasserhaushaltsgesetz), brandenburški zakon o vodah (Brandenburgisches Wassergesetz) in zakon KAG Brandenburg.
The opening decision in State aid case SA.23827 (2013/C) stated that if, after a formal investigation in State aid case SA.36147 (C 30/10), the Commission were to conclude that other aided investments constituted a single investment project together with the Propapier paper plant investment, or that additional aid was granted to Propapier in the form of infrastructure measures, then the combined aid package would have to be assessed for compliance with point 67 of the RAG.
Glej tudi uvodno izjavo 40 tega sklepa.
Germany reported in its submission of 15 May 2013 that an amount of EUR 30849271 had been paid out for eligible costs amounting to EUR 38561588.
Zadnji trije elementi so bili izrecno navedeni kot posebni razlogi za začetek postopka formalne preiskave.
Development of municipal economic infrastructure pursuant to Part II, Section 7(e) of the Framework plan under the joint Federal Government/Länder scheme for improving regional economic infrastructure: Construction or extension of waste water and refuse elimination and processing installations.
Čeprav je bilo vprašanje o tem, ali je čistilna naprava odpadnih voda namenska infrastruktura, izpostavljeno le v okviru vprašanja, ali nižje pristojbine pomenijo pomoč (glej uvodne izjave 86 do 89 sklepa o začetku postopka), je pritožnik ta element prvotne navedbe ponovil med postopkom formalne preiskave.
Commission Decision C(2003)1999 of 9 July 2003 in State aid case N 644e/02 (OJ C 197, 21.8.2003, p.
Ta element je bil skupaj z vsemi drugimi elementi pritožnikovih argumentov posredovan Nemčiji, ki je to vprašanje obravnavala v svojih pripombah.
12).
Komisija zaradi dejstva, da je Nemčija imela dovolj možnosti za obravnavo pritožnikovih navedb v zvezi z namenskostjo čistilne naprave odpadnih voda, ne verjame, da je preverjanje tega vprašanja zunaj obsega tega sklepa.
Kommunalabgabengesetz für das Land Brandenburg (KAG).
UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str.
The version in force at the time of the opening decision was the KAG of 31 March 2004 (GVBI.I/04, No 08, p.
13.
174), as last amended by Article 1 of the law of 27 May 2009 (GVBI.I/09, No 07, p.
Navesti je treba, da se pritožba nanaša na elektrarno, ki je bila prvotno del priglašenega projekta investicijskega projekta podjetja Propapier.
160).
Vendar je Nemčija Komisijo obvestila o naknadni spremembi projekta (izločitev elektrarne iz obsega priglasitve) in zmanjšala prvotno odobreno pomoč.
Paragraph 6 of the KAG in force at the time of the opening decision reads in this respect:Bei der Ermittlung der Verzinsung und der Abschreibungen bleibt der aus Beiträgen und bei der Verzinsung zusätzlich auch der aus Zuschüssen Dritter aufgebrachte Eigenkapitalanteil außer Betracht.(Translation: When calculating interest rates and depreciation, no account shall be taken of the share of equity derived from contributions or, in the case of interest rates, the share of equity derived from third-party subsidies.)The KAG as amended on 5 December 2013 (GVBI.I/13, [40]) reads:Bei der Ermittlung der Verzinsung und der Abschreibungen bleibt der aus Beiträgen aufgebrachte Eigenkapitalanteil außer Betracht (Abzugskapital).
Zato se Komisiji ni zdelo potrebno obravnavati pritožbe v zvezi s tem vprašanjem.
Die Gemeinden und Gemeindeverbände können ganz oder teilweise 1) Zuschüsse Dritter als Abzugskapital behandeln, 2) von einer Auflösung des Abzugskapitals zur Ermittlung der Verzinsung absehen, soweit dadurch die dauerhafte Bedienung des Kapitaldienstes nicht gefährdet wird.(Translation: When calculating interest rates and depreciation, no account shall be taken of the share of equity derived from contributions (deducted capital).
Glej uvodni izjavi 87 in 88 sklepa o začetku postopka.
The municipalities and municipal associations can treat all or part of grants from third parties as deducted capital, and can exclude deducted capital from bearing interest, in so far as the permanent principal repayment is not compromised).
V zvezi s povračilom stroškov storitev za rabo vode člen 9 okvirne direktive EU o vodah navaja: „Države članice upoštevajo načelo povračila stroškov storitev za rabo vode, skupaj z okoljskimi stroški in stroški virov, ob upoštevanju ekonomske analize, izvedene po Prilogi III, in zlasti skladno z načelom ‚plača povzročitelj obremenitve‘“.
The opening decision discussed extensively EU and German legislation applicable to waste water treatment, i.e. Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (OJ L 135, 30.5.1991, p.
Glej uvodno izjavo 69 sklepa o začetku postopka.
40), Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p.
UL L 260, 6.10.1999, str.
1), the German Federal Water Act (Wasserhaushaltsgesetz), the Brandenburg Water Act (Brandenburgisches Wassergesetz) and the KAG Brandenburg.
1, zlasti oddelek II.4.4 in oddelek IV.3.3.1.
See more in recital 40 of the present Decision.
UL L 12, 15.1.2002, str.
The last three elements were expressly listed as specific grounds for initiating the formal investigation procedure.
1, zlasti uvodni izjavi 196 in 201.
Although the issue of whether or not the waste water treatment plant was dedicated infrastructure was raised only in the context of the issue of whether or not the reduced fees constituted aid (see recitals 86-89 of the opening decision), the complainant repeated this element of its original complaint during the formal investigation procedure.
Nemčija je še pred sklepom o začetku postopka navedla, da je Komisija v zadevi Lenzing Lyocell (UL L 38, 8.2.2001, str.
This element (together with all other elements of the complainant’s arguments) was forwarded to Germany, which also addressed this issue in its responses.
33, uvodna izjava 41) sprejela dokaze Avstrije, ki so kazali, da je bila v drugi polovici 90. let 20. stoletja cena 0,5 EUR na kubični meter običajna tržna cena za čiščenje odpadnih voda.
In view of the fact that Germany had ample opportunity to address the allegations relating to the dedicated nature of the waste water treatment plant, the Commission does not believe that the examination of this question should be outside the scope of the present Decision.
Vendar je Komisija v sklepu o začetku postopka navedla, da se je zadeva Lenzing Lyocell nanašala na dejansko stanje pred več kot desetimi leti in na drugo državo članico.
OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p.
Glej člen 12(2) Kommunalverfassung des Landes Brandenburg (BbgKVerf) v povezavi s členom 7(1) in členom 8f statuta čistilne naprave odpadnih voda TAZV v industrijskem območju mesta Eisenhüttenstadt.
13.
Sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca z dne 28. aprila 1993 v zadevi Matra proti Komisiji, C-225/91, Recueil, str.
Thus, the Commission saw no reason to pursue the complaint with regard to this issue.
Na voljo na spletnem naslovu www.ipwonline.de.
See recitals 87 and 88 of the opening decision.
Združeni zadevi T-455/08, Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH in Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG proti Komisiji, in T-443/08, Freistaat Sachsen in Land Sachsen-Anhalt proti Komisiji, ki sta bili pozneje potrjeni s sodbo Sodišča z dne 19. decembra 2012 v zadevi C-288/11 P, Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG in Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH proti Komisiji.
Regarding the recovery of the costs for water services, Article 9 of the EU Water Framework Directive states that ‘Member States shall take account of the principle of recovery of the costs of water services, including environmental and resource costs, having regard to the economic analysis conducted according to Annex III, and in accordance in particular with the polluter pays principle’.
Nemčija je predložila povzetek nemške zakonodaje ter besedila zakonov o izračunu pristojbine v vseh 16 zveznih deželah.
See recital 69 of the opening decision.
V skladu s temi zakoni ni mogoče upoštevati pripisanih obresti na subvencije.
OJ L 260, 6.10.1999, p.
Glej Prilogo 10 k pripombam Nemčije z dne 1. novembra 2013.
1, in particular Section II.4.4 and Section IV.3.3.1.
Za pojasnilo o pomembnosti te zadeve glej opombo 19.
OJ L 12, 15.1.2002, p.
Glej sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje v združenih zadevah T-195/01 in T-207/01, Gibraltar proti Komisiji, Recueil 2002, str.
1, in particular recitals 196 and 201.
II-2309, točka 111.
Germany also argued prior to the opening decision that in the Lenzing Lyocell case (OJ L 38, 8.2.2001, p.
Sodba Sodišča v zadevi Namur-Les Assurances du Crédit SA proti Office National du Ducroire et al, C-44/93, Recueil 1994, str.
33, recital 41), the Commission accepted evidence submitted by Austria showing that, in the second half of the 1990s, EUR 0,50 per cubic meter was the normal market price for waste water treatment.
I-3829, točka 29.
However, the Commission in the opening decision held that the Lenzing Lyocell case concerned a factual situation that pre-dated the present case by more than 10 years, and concerned a different Member State.
Čeprav bavarski zakon navaja le, da imajo občine pravico do pobiranja dajatev, se sodba sodišča o izvajanju zakona sklicuje na zadevni člen zakona PrKAG v zvezi z načeli izračuna dajatve.
Opinion of Advocate General van Gerven of 28 April 1993 in Case C-225/91 Matra v Commission [1993] ECR I-3203, paragraph 28.
Po členu 23, drugi stavek ustave v različici z dne 23. maja 1949.
Covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.
Odločba Komisije 2003/227/ES z dne 2. avgusta 2002 o različnih ukrepih in državni pomoči, ki jo je Španija vložila v „Terra Mítica SA“, tematski park v bližini Benidorma (Alicante) ( UL L 91, 8.4.2003, str.
Available online at www.ipwonline.de
23), uvodna izjava 64.
Joined Cases T-455/08 Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH and Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG v Commission and T-443/08 Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission, later confirmed by the judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 December 2012 in Case C-288/11 P Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG and Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH v Commission.
Glej uvodne izjave 66 do 68 sklepa o začetku postopka.
Germany submitted a summary of German legislation and the texts of laws relating to the fee calculation in all 16 federal states.
Sodba Sodišča v zadevi De Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen in Limburg proti Visoki oblasti Evropske skupnosti za premog in jeklo, C-30/59, Recueil 1961, str.
Imputed interest on subsidies cannot be taken into account according to any of these laws.
1; v zadevi Ecotrade proti AFS, C-200/97, Recueil 1998, str.
See footnote 19 for an explanation of the relevance of this case.
I-2981, točka 15.
See Gibraltar v Commission, judgment of the Court of First Instance in Joined Cases T-195/01 and T-207/01 [2002] ECR II-2309, paragraph 111.
Glej točko 63 Sporočila Komisije – Smernice o državni pomoči letališčem in letalskim prevoznikom (UL C 99, 4.4.2014, str.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-44/93 Namur-Les Assurances du Crédit SA v Office National du Ducroire et al.
3).
[1994] ECR I-3829, paragraph 29.
Glej prejšnjo opombo.
Although the Bavarian law only states that municipalities are entitled to collect charges, a court ruling on its implementation refers to the relevant paragraph of the PrKAG for the principles of calculation of the charge.
Če mora na primer upravljavec infrastrukturo razširiti ali prilagoditi predvsem zato, da bi zadostil potrebam določenega uporabnika, bi bilo treba take stroške upoštevati pri izračunu prirastnih stroškov.
See page 36 of the Legal Reasoning behind the Municipal Charges Act of North Rhine-Westphalia, LT-Drs 5/810.
Glej četrti stavek odstavka 64 Smernic Komisije o državni pomoči letališčem in letalskim prevoznikom.
Paragraph 6(1) KAG NW and Paragraph 6 KAG Brandenburg: The estimated charges shall not exceed the estimated cost of the facility or installation (‘Die veranschlagten Gebühren sollen die voraussichtlichen Kosten der Einrichtung oder Anlage nicht übersteigen’).
Glej točko 64 Smernic Komisije o državni pomoči letališčem in letalskim prevoznikom in uvodno izjavo 94 odločbe Komisije v zadevi SA.1885 – C 5/2008 (ex NN 58/07) – Danska – Subvencija, ki jo je letalski družbi Ryanair nezakonito odobrilo Letališče Aarhus Ltd.
Paragraph 6(2) KAG NW and Paragraph 6(2) KAG Brandenburg: The costs include charges for third party services, depreciation and amortisation, which are to be applied evenly on the anticipated useful life or performance of the facility, as well as a reasonable return on the capital invested.
Gradbena dela so se končala konec marca 2011.
Interest on contributions or grants from third parties are not taken into account. ( ‘Zu ansatzfähigen Kosten gehören (…) Entgelte für in Anspruch genommene Fremdleistungen, Abschreibungen, die nach der mutmaßlichen Nutzungsdauer oder Leitungsmenge gleichmäßig zu bemessen sind, sowie eine angemessene Verzinsung des aufgewandten Kapitals.
Dovoz na parkirišče je označen vzdolž nove ceste in se ne nanaša na določeno podjetje ali obrat.
Bei der Verzinsung bleibt der aus Beiträgen und Zuschüssen Dritter aufgebrachte Eigenkapital außer Betracht’).
Pritožnik navaja, da je bil članek, ki ga omenja Nemčija, objavljen leta 2004 in temelji na študiji, ki je bila objavljena leta 2002 ter je uporabljala podatke iz let 2000 in 2001.
Gesetz über die Selbstverwaltung der Gemeinden und Gemeindeverbände in der DDR vom 17 Mai 1990.
Pritožnik se sklicuje na Prilogo 6 k pripombam Nemčije z dne 30. januarja 2009, ki vsebuje članek iz spletnega medija „Das Papier 2004 ‒ T174“ [23].
Under Article 23, second sentence of the Basic Law in the version dated 23 May 1949.
Po navedbah pritožnika študija zajema le sedem anonimnih papirnic.
See recitals 66 to 68 of the opening decision.
V zvezi z argumentom, da pristojbine pomenijo obstoječo pomoč, Nemčija navaja, da pristojbine pomenijo pomoč, ki je obstajala pred začetkom veljavnosti Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske gospodarske skupnosti 1. januarja 1958.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case 30/59 De Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen in Limburg v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community [1961] ECR 1; Case C-200/97 Ecotrade v AFS [1998] ECR I-7907, paragraph 34; and Case C-6/97 Italy v Commission [1999] ECR I-2981, paragraph 15.
Pomoč, ki je obstajala pred začetkom veljavnosti zadevne Pogodbe, ostaja obstoječa pomoč tudi v primeru naknadnih sprememb, če dejanska vsebina prvotne sheme pomoči ni bila spremenjena [27].
Idem.
Znak, ki ga omenja pritožnik (glej uvodno izjavo 46) in ki označuje parkirna mesta za tovornjake, namenjene v elektrarno, je bil v uporabi le začasno, in sicer med izvajanjem gradbenih del v elektrarni, ki so bila zaključena konec marca 2011.
For instance, if the operator needs to expand or adapt the infrastructure mainly to accommodate the needs of a specific user, such costs should be taken into consideration when calculating the incremental costs.
Komisija upošteva, da je parkirišče prosto dostopno, dostop do njega pa je označen ob javni cesti brez omemb določenega podjetja.
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/512
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/512
of 25 March 2015
z dne 25. marca 2015
At the 2104th meeting of the College on 5 November 2014, the Commission decided to reorganise its services and to transfer from the European Anti-fraud Office to the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs the tasks related to the preparation of legislative and regulatory initiatives of the Commission with the objective of the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, and of support in that area through training and technical assistance.
Komisija je 5. novembra 2014 na 2104. seji kolegija sklenila, da bo reorganizirala svoje službe ter prenesla naloge v zvezi s pobudami Komisije za zakonske in podzakonske akte s ciljem zaščite eura proti ponarejanju in nalogo podpore na tem področju prek usposabljanja in tehnične pomoči z Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam na Generalni direktorat za gospodarske in finančne zadeve.
Commission Decision 1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom [1] should therefore be amended.
Sklep Komisije št. 1999/352/ES, ESPJ, Euratom [1] bi bilo zato treba spremeniti.
As the abovementioned reorganisation of the Commission services became effective on 1 January 2015, the relevant legal provisions should be updated without delay,
Ker je navedena reorganizacija služb Komisije začela učinkovati 1. januarja 2015, bi bilo treba nemudoma posodobiti ustrezne pravne določbe –
Article 2 of Decision 1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom is amended as follows:
Člen 2 Sklepa št. 1999/352/ES, ESPJ, Euratom se spremeni:
in paragraph 2, the second sentence is deleted;
v odstavku 2 se drugi stavek črta;
The Office shall be responsible for the preparation of the legislative and regulatory initiatives of the Commission with the objective of fraud prevention as referred to in paragraph 1.’ .
Urad je odgovoren za pripravo pobud Komisije za zakonske in podzakonske akte s ciljem preprečevanja goljufij iz odstavka 1.“
Done at Brussels, 25 March 2015.
V Bruslju, 25. marca 2015
Commission Decision 1999/352/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 28 April 1999 establishing the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) (OJ L 136, 31.5.1999, p. 20).
Sklep Komisije 1999/352/ES, ESPJ, Euratom z dne 28. aprila 1999 o ustanovitvi Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) (UL L 136, 31.5.1999, str. 20).
Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/521
Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2015/521
of 26 March 2015
z dne 26. marca 2015
updating and amending the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision 2014/483/CFSP
o posodobitvi in spremembi seznama oseb, skupin in subjektov, za katere se uporabljajo členi 2, 3 in 4 Skupnega stališča 2001/931/SZVP o uporabi posebnih ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu, in razveljavitvi Sklepa 2014/483/SZVP
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 29 Pogodbe,
On 22 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/483/CFSP [2] updating and amending the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP (‘the list’).
Svet je 22. julija 2014 sprejel Sklep 2014/483/SZVP [2] o posodobitvi in spremembi seznama oseb, skupin in subjektov, za katere se uporabljajo členi 2, 3 in 4 Skupnega stališča 2001/931/SZVP (v nadaljnjem besedilu: seznam).
This Decision sets out the result of the review that the Council has carried out in respect of persons, groups and entities to which Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP apply.
V tem sklepu je izid pregleda, ki ga je opravil Svet v zvezi z osebami, skupinami in subjekti, za katere se uporabljajo členi 2, 3 in 4 Skupnega stališča 2001/931/SZVP.
The Council has verified that competent authorities as referred to in Article 1(4) of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP have taken decisions with regard to all the persons, groups and entities on the list to the effect that they have been involved in terrorist acts within the meaning of Article 1(2) and (3) of that Common Position.
Svet je preveril, da so pristojni organi iz člena 1(4) Skupnega stališča 2001/931/SZVP sprejeli odločitve, da so bile osebe, skupine in subjekti s seznama vpleteni v teroristična dejanja v smislu člena 1(2) in (3) navedenega skupnega stališča.