natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By letter of 10 November 2015 the Commission requested additional information to which the French authorities replied by letter dated 30 November 2015.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 10. novembra 2015 zahtevala dodatne informacije, francoski organi pa so odgovorili z dopisom z dne 30. novembra 2015.
The Commission published a summary of the intended amendments in the Official Journal of the European Union on 2 December 2015 and invited interested parties to submit comments [3].
Komisija je 2. decembra 2015 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavila povzetek načrtovanih sprememb in zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj podajo svoje pripombe [3].
BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE
OZADJE IN OPIS UKREPA
THE DECREE OF 15 NOVEMBER 1994
ODLOK Z DNE 15.
In response to a complaint the Commission, by Commission Decision 95/259/EC [4], declared the traffic distribution rules for the Paris airport system set out in the French Decree of 15 November 1994 as compatible with Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 [5].
Parizu služijo letališča Charles-de-Gaulle, Orly in Le Bourget, kjer se porazdelitev prometa ureja kolektivno z odlokom z dne 15. novembra 1994.
This regulation has since been repealed and replaced by Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.
V odgovor na pritožbo je Komisija z odločbo Komisije 95/259/ES [4] razglasila, da so pravila o porazdelitvi prometa za letališki sistem Pariza iz odloka z dne 15. novembra 1994 v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 2408/92 [5].
The Commission's decision was conditional on the Decree being amended as indicated in the decision.
Ta uredba je bila pozneje razveljavljena in nadomeščena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1008/2008.
The French authorities complied with the requirement through an amendment to the Decree on 1 March 1996.
Odločba Komisije je bila pogojena s spremembo odloka, kot je navedeno v odločbi.
The Decree of 15 November 1994 as amended (hereinafter the ‘1994 Decree’) applies only to intra-EEA traffic.
Francoski organi so zahtevo izpolnili s spremembo odloka z dne 1. marca 1996.
It provides that non-scheduled air services to and from EEA airports provided with an aircraft having a capacity of 25 seats or less, for which the seats are not marketed individually to the public, either directly by the carrier or indirectly, must operate from/to Le Bourget.
Odlok z dne 15. novembra 1994, kot je bil spremenjen (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odlok iz leta 1994), se uporablja samo za promet znotraj EGP.
All other intra-EEA traffic may be operated from/to Charles-de-Gaulle and Orly airports.
Določa, da se morajo posebni zračni prevozi na letališča EGP in z njih z zrakoplovom z zmogljivostjo 25 sedežev ali manj, katerega sedeži se javnosti ne tržijo posamezno, bodisi neposredno s strani prevoznika ali posredno, opravljati na letališče Le Bourget ali z njega.
Access to Orly is restricted to four daily frequencies on routes between Orly and other EEA airports during certain times of the day.
Preostali promet znotraj EGP se lahko izvaja na letališči Charles-de-Gaulle in Orly ali z njiju.
During peak hours the restriction at Orly does not apply, if services are provided with aircraft of a certain minimum size.
Dostop do letališča Orly je omejen na štiri lete na dan na progah med letališčem Orly in drugimi letališči EGP v nekaterih obdobjih dneva.
THE INTENDED AMENDMENTS AND UNDERLYING CONSIDERATIONS
V času prometnih konic omejitve na letališču Orly ne veljajo, če se prevozi opravljajo z zrakoplovi določene minimalne velikosti.
The intended amendments to the existing traffic distribution rules for airports serving Paris remove existing restrictions applied to Orly airport, in terms of daily frequencies, depending also on aircraft size at Orly airport, currently enshrined in Articles 4 and 5 of the 1994 Decree, quoted in full in Section I of Decision 95/259/EC.
NAČRTOVANE SPREMEMBE IN OZADJE
These restrictions imposed specifically at Orly were aimed at optimising limited capacity at the airport and preventing air carriers from operating more than four frequencies per carrier on a given route, thereby encouraging the use of slots for different destinations.
Predvidene spremembe obstoječih pravil o porazdelitvi prometa za letališča, ki služijo Parizu, odpravljajo obstoječe omejitve, ki se uporabljajo na letališču Orly za dnevne lete, pri čemer se upošteva tudi velikost zrakoplova na letališču Orly, in ki so trenutno določene v členih 4 in 5 odloka iz leta 1994, ki sta v celoti navedena v oddelku I Odločbe 95/259/ES.
The restrictions also had the effect of optimising the use of scarce slots by preventing the use of aircraft below a certain threshold size on routes which had enough passenger traffic justifying the use of larger aircraft, merely in order to fulfil slot use requirements.
Te omejitve so bile uvedene posebej za Orly; optimizirale naj bi omejene zmogljivosti letališča in preprečile, da bi posamezni letalski prevozniki opravljali več kot štiri lete na dani progi, s čimer naj bi spodbudile uporabo slotov za različne namembne kraje.
The size thresholds were set according to the amount of passenger traffic on a given route.
Omejitve so prav tako optimizirale uporabo omejenih slotov, saj so preprečile, da bi se zrakoplovi pod določenim pragom velikosti samo zaradi izpolnjevanja zahtev glede uporabe slotov uporabljali na progah, kjer je bilo dovolj potniškega prometa za upravičeno uporabo večjih zrakoplovov.
According to the French authorities, those particular restrictions are no longer necessary.
Pragovi velikosti so bili določeni glede na obseg potniškega prometa na določeni progi.
The French authorities seem to be satisfied with the current situation of slot usage at Orly, as they have stated that slot use has been naturally optimized since the introduction of the 1994 Decree.
Po navedbah francoskih organov te posebne omejitve niso več potrebne.
Since all slots at Orly are currently being used, the possibility for other services to acquire slots at the airport is very limited.
Francoski organi so zadovoljni s trenutnim stanjem uporabe slotov na letališču Orly, saj so ugotovili, da se je uporaba slotov samodejno optimizirala od uvedbe odloka iz leta 1994.
Operators now also use larger aircraft in order to maximise capacity and therefore optimise slot usage in their own interest in ways that also benefit the optimal use of capacity at Orly airport.
Ker so trenutno na letališču Orly vsi sloti v uporabi, je možnost pridobitve slotov za druge letalske povezave na letališču zelo omejena.
Concerning the remaining provisions of the 1994 Decree the intended amendments also extend the application of the traffic distribution rules, currently applicable to intra-EEA services only, also to extra-EEA services as explained in the two following paragraphs.
Operaterji zdaj prav tako uporabljajo večje zrakoplove, da bi povečali zmogljivost in s tem optimizirali uporabo slotov v svojem interesu tako, da bi to spodbudilo tudi optimalno uporabo zmogljivosti na letališču Orly.
Le Bourget only receives non-scheduled services provided by aircraft having a capacity of 25 seats or less for which the seats are not marketed individually to the public.
Kar se tiče preostalih določb odloka iz leta 1994, načrtovane spremembe tudi razširjajo uporabo pravil glede porazdelitve prometa, ki se trenutno uporabljajo samo za prevoze znotraj EGP, na prevoze zunaj EGP, kot je razloženo v naslednjih dveh odstavkih.
The effect of the intended amendments will be that extra-EEA traffic on scheduled services, services provided on aircraft with 25 seats or more, and in case the seats are marketed individually to the public, directly by the carrier or indirectly will be excluded from Le Bourget.
Le Bourget je namenjen le posebnim zračnim prevozom z zrakoplovom z zmogljivostjo 25 sedežev ali manj, katerega sedeži se javnosti ne tržijo posamezno.
The upper limit of seats is subject to possible derogations by the competent minister, in duly justified cases.
Posledica načrtovanih sprememb bo, da bo promet zunaj EGP, kar se tiče rednega zračnega prevoza, prevoza na zrakoplovih s 25 sedeži ali več in v primeru, ko se sedeži javnosti tržijo posamezno, bodisi neposredno s strani prevoznika ali posredno, izključen iz letališča Le Bourget.
At present, these restrictions are applicable exclusively to intra-EEA-services.
V ustrezno utemeljenih primerih se lahko za zgornjo mejo sedežev uporabijo odstopanja, ki jih odobri pristojni minister.
All other services are directed to Orly and Charles-de-Gaulle.
Trenutno se te omejitve uporabljajo izključno za prevoze znotraj EGP.
The intended amendments have the effect of restricting extra-EEA traffic on non-scheduled services provided by aircraft with 25 seats or less, unless the seats are marketed individually to the public or, subject to prior authorisation, unless the aircraft in question carries connecting passengers.
Vsi drugi prevozi se usmerijo na letališči Orly in Charles-de-Gaulle.
This corresponds to the existing restrictions for intra-EEA services [6].
Načrtovane spremembe omejujejo promet zunaj EGP, kar se tiče posebnih zračnih prevozov z zrakoplovom s 25 sedeži ali manj, razen če se sedeži javnosti tržijo posamezno ali če zadevni zrakoplov prevaža tranzitne potnike (v slednjem primeru je potrebna predhodna odobritev).
The French authorities foresee the following impact on the traffic distribution as it is at the moment [7]:
To ustreza obstoječim omejitvam za prevoze znotraj EGP [6].
Regarding intra-EEA traffic the rules remain essentially the same and there is no real impact.
Francoski organi predvidevajo naslednji vpliv na trenutno porazdelitev prometa [7]:
The rules will introduce a prohibition on scheduled extra-EEA services at Le Bourget, however no such services are operated at Le Bourget at the moment anyway.
Kar se tiče prometa znotraj EGP, pravila večinoma ostajajo enaka in pomembnejšega vpliva ni.
The rules will also introduce a prohibition of non-scheduled extra-EEA flights on large aircraft at Le Bourget, however the current number of those services is small (130 flights out of 54000 in 2014).
S pravili bo na letališču Le Bourget začela veljati prepoved rednih zračnih prevozov zunaj EGP, vendar se takšni prevozi na letališču Le Bourget trenutno ne opravljajo.
Non-scheduled extra-EEA services provided by aircraft having a capacity of 25 seats or less for which the seats are not marketed individually to the public will be prohibited at Orly and Charles-de-Gaulle.
S pravili bo na letališču Le Bourget prav tako začela veljati prepoved posebnih letov zunaj EGP z velikimi zrakoplovi, vendar je trenutno število teh prevozov majhno (130 letov od 54000 letov v letu 2014).
However due to the limited availability of slots there is currently only a very limited number of non-scheduled services provided by aircraft having a capacity of 25 seats or less at Orly airport.
Na letališčih Orly in Charles-de-Gaulle bodo prepovedani posebni zračni prevozi zunaj EGP z zrakoplovom z zmogljivostjo 25 sedežev ali manj, katerega sedeži se javnosti ne tržijo posamezno.
As regards Charles-de-Gaulle, operators of non-scheduled services provided by aircraft having a capacity of 25 seats or less today already prefer Le Bourget because of its proximity to the city and its classification as a business aviation airport.
Vendar je na letališču Orly zaradi omejene razpoložljivosti slotov trenutno na voljo zelo omejeno število posebnih zračnih prevozov z zrakoplovom, ki ima 25 sedežev ali manj.
The French authorities explained that the current restrictions imposed by the 1994 Decree insofar as it concerned aircraft with 25 seats or less for which the seats were not marketed to the public (Article 6 of the Decree) were justified by the need to optimise the use of limited capacity at Charles-de-Gaulle and Orly.
Kar zadeva Charles-de-Gaulle, operaterji posebnih zračnih prevozov z zrakoplovom, ki ima 25 sedežev ali manj, že zdaj raje uporabljajo Le Bourget zaradi bližine mesta in njegove opredelitve kot letališča za poslovno letalstvo.
According to the French authorities, in order to achieve this optimisation it was necessary to ensure a homogenisation of aircraft type, which allows for regular flight movements at identical distances of time and space between movements.
Francoski organi so pojasnili, da so bile sedanje omejitve iz odloka iz leta 1994, če bi zadeval zrakoplove s 25 sedeži ali manj, katerih sedeži se javnosti ne tržijo (člen 6 odloka), utemeljene zaradi potrebe po optimizaciji uporabe omejenih zmogljivosti na letališčih Charles-de-Gaulle in Orly.
Smaller, and thus potentially slower, aircraft disrupt the regular sequence, as small aircraft require more space and time between flight movements.
Po navedbah francoskih organov je bilo treba za dosego te optimizacije zagotoviti poenotenje tipa zrakoplova, da bi omogočili redne premike zrakoplovov z enakimi časovnimi in prostorskimi razdaljami med premiki.
Therefore, these non-scheduled services provided on aircraft having a capacity of 25 seats or less, for which the seats are not marketed individually to the public, are directed to Le Bourget, in order to not disrupt the regular sequence.
Manjši in zato potencialno počasnejši zrakoplovi ovirajo enakomerno zaporedje, saj majhen zrakoplov potrebuje več prostora in časa med premiki zrakoplovov.
Non-scheduled services provided on aircraft having a capacity of 25 seats or less for which the seats are marketed to the public, on the other hand, must operate to/from Orly and Charles-de-Gaulle.
Zato so ti posebni zračni prevozi z zrakoplovom z zmogljivostjo 25 sedežev ali manj, katerega sedeži se javnosti ne tržijo posamezno, usmerjeni na Le Bourget, da ne bi prekinili enakomernega zaporedja.
According to the French authorities this is due to the fact that Le Bourget, for reasons explained in the next paragraph, does not accept any service marketed to the public.
Po drugi strani se morajo posebni zračni prevozi z zrakoplovom z zmogljivostjo 25 sedežev ali manj, katerega sedeži se tržijo javnosti, izvajati na letališči Orly in Charles-de-Gaulle in z njiju.
However, due to the fact that these services are limited and subject to finding an available ad hoc slot at Orly and Charles-de-Gaulle they are not considered disruptive in these airports.
Po mnenju francoskih organov je vzrok temu dejstvo, da Le Bourget iz razlogov, navedenih v naslednjem odstavku, ne sprejema prevozov, ki se tržijo javnosti.
Concerning the air traffic accepted at Le Bourget, the French authorities stated that a choice has been made to reserve the airport for business and general aviation and as a show room for certain international air and space events.
Vendar se ti prevozi zaradi dejstva, da so omejeni in da je zanje treba najti ad hoc slot, ki je na voljo, ne štejejo kot moteči na letališčih Orly in Charles-de-Gaulle.
The airport infrastructure is adapted to this end, and therefore directing any commercial services, scheduled services or any non-scheduled services on large aircraft to Le Bourget would require prior investment in order to adapt the infrastructure to those types of services.
Kar zadeva zračni promet, ki ga Le Bourget sprejme, so francoski organi navedli, da je bila sprejeta odločitev, da se letališče pridrži za poslovno in splošno letalstvo ter kot razstavni prostor za določene mednarodne dogodke s področja zračnega in vesoljskega prometa.
In addition, scheduled services and services on large aircraft would have environmental impacts on the residents.
Letališka infrastruktura je temu prilagojena, zato bi bile za usmeritev kakršnih koli komercialnih prevozov, rednih zračnih prevozov ali posebnih zračnih prevozov na velikem zrakoplovu na letališče Le Bourget potrebne predhodne naložbe za prilagoditev infrastrukture tovrstnemu prevozu.
According to the French authorities, the abovementioned considerations, relevant to each of the airports concerned, also pertain to traffic to and from non-EEA countries.
Poleg tega bi imeli redni prevozi in prevozi na velikih zrakoplovih okoljske učinke na prebivalstvo.
Since such traffic has been widely liberalised on the basis of new air services agreements, it has witnessed a considerable increase since the entry into application of the 1994 Decree.
Po mnenju francoskih organov zgoraj navedeno glede posameznih zadevnih letališč velja tudi za promet v države, ki niso članice EGP, in iz njih.
Hence, the French authorities state that it is necessary to apply the restrictions referred to above to all traffic.
Ker je bil tak promet v veliki meri liberaliziran na podlagi novih sporazumov o zračnem prevozu, se je precej povečal od začetka veljavnosti odloka iz leta 1994.
CONSULTATION CONDUCTED BY THE FRENCH AUTHORITIES
Zato francoski organi navajajo, da bi morale zgoraj navedene omejitve veljati za ves promet.
The French authorities conducted a consultation process prior to the notification of the intended amendments to the Commission [8]:
POSVETOVANJE, KI SO GA OPRAVILI FRANCOSKI ORGANI
a notice of new draft rules was published on 19 May 2015 on the public consultations website of the Ministry for Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy,
Preden so obvestili Komisijo o nameravanih spremembah, so francoski organi izvedli postopek posvetovanja [8]:
an alert about the intention to modify the existing traffic distribution rules for the Paris airport system was published in the Official Journal of the French Republic of 21 May 2015 with a link to the draft text,
Obvestilo o osnutku novih pravil je bilo 19. maja 2015 objavljeno na spletišču Ministrstva za ekologijo, trajnostni razvoj in energijo, namenjenemu javnim posvetovanjem.
the period for public consultation ended 21 July 2015.
Opozorilo o nameravanih spremembah veljavnih pravil o porazdelitvi prometa za letališki sistem Pariza je bilo objavljeno v Uradnem listu Francoske republike z dne 21. maja 2015 skupaj s povezavo na osnutek besedila.
Prior to the public consultation the French authorities had orally consulted the air transport associations FNAM (Fédération Nationale de l'Aviation Marchande), SCARA (Syndicat des Compagnies Aériennes Autonomes) and EBAA (European Business Aviation Association), which expressed their support to the modifications, having regard in particular to the intended consistency of the treatment of intra- and extra-EEA services.
Obdobje za javno posvetovanje se je končalo 21. julija 2015.
The French authorities received submissions from three interested parties, which were taken into account in the draft text.
Pred javnim posvetovanjem so se francoski organi ustno posvetovali z združenji letalskih prevoznikov FNAM (Fédération Nationale de l'Aviation Marchande), SCARA (Syndicat des Compagnies Aériennes Autonomes) in EBAA (European Business Aviation Association), ki so podprli spremembe, zlasti ob upoštevanju predvidene doslednosti pri obravnavi prevoza znotraj in zunaj EGP.
The initial draft rules included a provision to allow non-scheduled services provided on aircraft having a capacity of 25 seats or less to operate to/from Orly and Charles-de-Gaulle where these flights carry connecting passengers without the need to obtain a prior derogation.
Francoske oblasti so prejele pripombe treh zainteresiranih strani, ki so bile upoštevane v osnutku besedila.
This provision was rejected by aéroports de Paris (ADP), and subsequently excluded from the draft text.
Prvotni osnutek predpisov je vključeval določbo, ki je omogočala, da se posebni zračni prevozi z zrakoplovom z zmogljivostjo 25 sedežev ali manj opravljajo na letališči Orly in Charles-de-Gaulle in z njiju, če so na teh letih tranzitni potniki, ne da bi bilo treba pridobiti predhodno odstopanje.
It was considered that permitting blanket access of these flights to Charles-de-Gaulle and Orly airports could have a detrimental effect on the scheduled traffic at those airports.
Družba Aéroports de Paris (ADP) je to določbo zavrnila in določba je bila nato izključena iz osnutka besedila.
CONSULTATION CONDUCTED BY THE COMMISSION
Štelo se je, da bi lahko dovoljenje za neomejen dostop teh letov do letališč Orly in Charles-de-Gaulle negativno vplivalo na redni prevoz na teh letališčih.
In response to the publication of a summary of the intended amendments in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Commission received comments from one interested party.
POSVETOVANJE, KI GA JE OPRAVILA KOMISIJA
The interested party argued that the restriction on the type of services that may operate to/from Le Bourget is excessive and contrary to the interests of consumers, the region and the airport.
Komisija je kot odgovor na objavo povzetka nameravanih sprememb v Uradnem listu Evropske unije prejela pripombe ene zainteresirane strani.
Further, the party pointed out that no study was carried out to assess the economic impact and the effect on air traffic of the intended amendments, as compared to the existing traffic distribution rules.
Zainteresirana stran je trdila, da je omejitev glede na vrsto prevozov, ki se lahko opravljajo na letališče Le Bourget in z njega, pretirana in v nasprotju z interesi potrošnikov, regije in letališča.
The party claimed that the distinction based on scheduled or non-scheduled services and the size of the aircraft is arbitrary and unjustified.
Poleg tega je zainteresirana stran opozorila, da ni bila izvedena nobena študija, ki bi ocenila, kakšen je ekonomski učinek in učinek na zračni promet načrtovanih sprememb v primerjavi z obstoječimi pravili o porazdelitvi prometa.
The party suggested that the new rules could be interpreted as turning air traffic away from Le Bourget where the terminal services are managed by seven independent operators, and pushing it towards Charles-de-Gaulle and Orly airports where the terminals are operated by a monopoly.
Zainteresirana stran je trdila, da je razlikovanje na podlagi rednih ali posebnih prevozov in velikosti zrakoplova samovoljno in neupravičeno.
Lastly, the party stated that the consultation process was discriminatory.
Zainteresirana stran je menila, da bi lahko nova pravila razumeli kot pravila, ki zračni promet preusmerjajo z letališča Le Bourget, kjer storitve na terminalu upravlja sedem neodvisnih operaterjev, na letališči Charles-de-Gaulle in Orly, na katerih se terminali upravljajo monopolno.
It claimed that unlike other stakeholders, the party was not invited to meetings where the intended amendments were discussed and assessed.
Zainteresirana stran je prav tako navedla, da je bil postopek posvetovanja diskriminatoren.
It therefore was only able to make a written contribution.
Trdila je, da za razliko od drugih zainteresiranih strani ni bila povabljena na sestanke, na katerih so bile načrtovane spremembe obravnavane in ocenjene.
THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 19 OF REGULATION (EC) No 1008/2008
Zato je lahko prispevala le v pisni obliki.
Article 19(2) of the Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 provides that a Member State, after consultation with interested parties, may regulate, without discrimination among destinations inside the Community and on grounds of nationality or identity of air carriers, the distribution of air traffic between airports satisfying the following conditions:
DOLOČBE ČLENA 19 UREDBE (ES) št. 1008/2008
the airports serve the same city or conurbation;
Člen 19(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008 določa, da lahko država članica po posvetovanju z zadevnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi brez diskriminacije določenih letališč v Skupnosti in ne glede na državljanstvo ali identiteto letalskega prevoznika ureja porazdelitev zračnega prometa med letališči ob izpolnjevanju naslednjih pogojev:
the airports are served by adequate transport infrastructure providing, to the extent possible, a direct connection making it possible to arrive at the airport within 90 minutes including, where necessary on a cross-border basis;
letališča služijo istemu mestu ali somestju;
the airports are linked to one another and to the city or conurbation they serve by frequent, reliable and efficient public transport services; and
letališča imajo ustrezno prometno infrastrukturo, ki zagotavlja, kolikor je to mogoče, neposredno povezavo, tako da je mogoče prispeti na letališče v devetdesetih minutah, vključno s prečkanjem meje, kjer je to potrebno;