natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The regulations governing use of a mark referred to in Article 29(3) shall authorise any person whose goods or services originate in the geographical area concerned to become a member of the association which is the proprietor of the mark, provided that the person fulfils all the other conditions of the regulations.
Pravilnik o uporabi znamke iz člena 29(3) vsaki osebi, katere blago ali storitve izvirajo z zadevnega geografskega območja, omogoča, da postane član združenja, ki je imetnik znamke, če navedena oseba izpolnjuje vse druge pogoje iz pravilnika.
Refusal of an application
Zavrnitev prijave
In addition to the grounds for refusal of a trade mark application provided for in Article 4, where appropriate with the exception of Article 4(1)(c) concerning signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the geographical origin of the goods or services, and Article 5,and without prejudice to the right of an office not to undertake examination ex officio of relative grounds, an application for a collective mark shall be refused where the provisions of point (b) of Article 27, Article 29 or Article 30 are not satisfied, or where the regulations governing use of that collective mark are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality.
Poleg razlogov za zavrnitev prijave blagovne znamke iz člena 4, kadar je primerno, z izjemo točke (c) člena 4(1) v zvezi z znaki ali označbami, ki se v gospodarskem prometu lahko uporabljajo za označevanje geografskega porekla blaga ali storitev, ter člena 5, in brez poseganja v pravico urada, da ne preveri relativnih razlogov po uradni dolžnosti, se prijava kolektivne znamke zavrne, če niso izpolnjene določbe iz točke (b) člena 27, člena 29 ali člena 30 ali če je pravilnik o uporabi znamke te kolektivne znamke v nasprotju z javnim redom ali sprejetimi moralnimi načeli.
An application for a collective mark shall also be refused if the public is liable to be misled as regards the character or the significance of the mark, in particular if it is likely to be taken to be something other than a collective mark.
Prijava kolektivne blagovne znamke se zavrne tudi, če lahko zavaja javnost glede značaja ali pomena znamke, zlasti če je verjetno, da jo bodo razumeli drugače kot kolektivno znamko.
An application shall not be refused if the applicant, as a result of amendment of the regulations governing use of the collective mark, meets the requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
Prijava se ne zavrne, če prijavitelj s spremembo pravilnika o uporabi kolektivne znamke izpolni zahteve iz odstavkov 1 in 2.
Use of collective marks
Uporaba kolektivnih znamk
The requirements of Article 16 shall be satisfied where genuine use of a collective mark in accordance with that Article is made by any person who has authority to use it.
Zahteve iz člena 16 so izpolnjene, kadar katera koli oseba, pooblaščena za uporabo kolektivne znamke, to resno in dejansko uporablja v skladu z navedenim členom.
Amendments to the regulations governing use of a collective mark
Spremembe pravilnika o uporabi kolektivnih znamk
The proprietor of a collective mark shall submit to the office any amended regulations governing use.
Imetnik kolektivne znamke uradu predloži vsakršne spremembe pravilnika o uporabi.
Amendments to the regulations governing use shall be mentioned in the register unless the amended regulations do not satisfy the requirements of Article 30 or involve one of the grounds for refusal referred to in Article 31.
Sprememba pravilnika o uporabi se vpiše v register, razen če spremenjeni pravilnik ne izpolnjuje zahtev iz člena 30 ali če vsebuje enega od razlogov za zavrnitev iz člena 31.
For the purposes of this Directive, amendments to the regulations governing use shall take effect only from the date of entry of the mention of those amendments in the register.
Za namene te direktive začnejo spremembe pravilnika o uporabi učinkovati šele od datuma začetka vnosa teh sprememb v register.
Persons entitled to bring an action for infringement
Osebe, upravičene do vložitve tožbe zaradi kršitve pravic
Article 25(3) and (4) shall apply to every person who has the authority to use a collective mark.
Člen 25(3) in (4) se uporablja za vsako osebo, ki je pooblaščena za uporabo kolektivne znamke.
The proprietor of a collective mark shall be entitled to claim compensation on behalf of persons who have authority to use the mark where those persons have sustained damage as a result of unauthorised use of the mark.
Imetnik blagovne znamke ima pravico, da v imenu oseb, ki so pooblaščene za uporabo znamke, zahteva nadomestilo, kadar so navedene osebe utrpele škodo zaradi nepooblaščene uporabe znamke.
Additional grounds for revocation
Dodatni razlogi za razveljavitev
In addition to the grounds for revocation provided for in Articles 19 and 20, the rights of the proprietor of a collective mark shall be revoked on the following grounds:
Poleg razlogov za razveljavitev iz členov 19 in 20 se pravice imetnika kolektivne znamke razveljavijo iz naslednjih razlogov:
the proprietor does not take reasonable steps to prevent the mark being used in a manner that is incompatible with the conditions of use laid down in the regulations governing use, including any amendments thereto mentioned in the register;
imetnik ne izvede razumnih ukrepov, da bi preprečil uporabo znamke na način, ki ni združljiv s pogoji uporabe iz pravilnika o uporabi, vključno z vsakršno spremembo pravilnika, vpisano v register;
the manner in which the mark has been used by authorised persons has caused it to become liable to mislead the public in the manner referred to in Article 31(2);
zaradi načina, na katerega so pooblaščene osebe uporabljale znamko, je ta lahko povzročila zavajanje javnosti, kot je navedeno v členu 31(2);
an amendment to the regulations governing use of the mark has been mentioned in the register in breach of Article 33(2), unless the proprietor of the mark, by further amending the regulations governing use, complies with the requirements of that Article.
sprememba pravilnika o uporabi znamke je navedena v registru v nasprotju s členom 33(2), razen če imetnik znamke z nadaljnjo spremembo pravilnika o uporabi izpolni zahteve iz navedenega člena.
Additional grounds for invalidity
Dodatni razlogi za ničnost
In addition to the grounds for invalidity provided for in Article 4, where appropriate with the exception of Article 4(1)(c) concerning signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the geographical origin of the goods or services, and Article 5, a collective mark which is registered in breach of Article 31 shall be declared invalid unless the proprietor of the mark, by amending the regulations governing use, complies with the requirements of Article 31.
Poleg razlogov za ničnost iz člena 4, kadar je primerno, z izjemo točke (c) člena 4(1) v zvezi z znaki ali označbami, ki se v gospodarskem prometu lahko uporabljajo za označevanje geografskega porekla blaga ali storitev, in člena 5, se kolektivna znamka, ki je registrirana v nasprotju s členom 31, ugotovi za nično, razen če imetnik znamke s spremembo pravilnika o uporabi izpolni zahteve iz člena 31.
Application and registration
Prijava in registracija
Application requirements
Zahteve v zvezi s prijavo
An application for registration of a trade mark shall contain at least all of the following:
Prijava za registracijo blagovne znamke vsebuje vsaj vse naslednje:
a request for registration;
zahtevo za registracijo;
information identifying the applicant;
informacije o identiteti prijavitelja;
a list of the goods or services in respect of which the registration is requested;
seznam blaga ali storitev, za katere se zahteva registracija;
a representation of the trade mark, which satisfies the requirements set out in point (b) of Article 3.
prikaz blagovne znamke, ki izpolnjuje pogoje iz točke (b) člena 3.
The application for a trade mark shall be subject to the payment of a fee determined by the Member State concerned.
Za prijavo blagovne znamke se plača pristojbina, ki jo določi zadevna država članica.
Date of filing
Datum vložitve prijave
The date of filing of a trade mark application shall be the date on which the documents containing the information specified in Article 37(1) are filed with the office by the applicant.
Datum vložitve prijave blagovne znamke je datum, na katerega prijavitelj uradu predloži dokumente, ki vsebujejo informacije iz člena 37(1).
Member States may, in addition, provide that the accordance of the date of filing is to be subject to the payment of a fee as referred to in Article 37(2).
Države članice lahko poleg tega določijo, da je dodelitev datuma vložitve prijave odvisna od plačila pristojbine iz člena 37(2).
Designation and classification of goods and services
Določitev in razvrstitev blaga in storitev
The goods and services in respect of which trade mark registration is applied for shall be classified in conformity with the system of classification established by the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957 (‘the Nice Classification’).
Blago in storitve, za katere se vloži prijava za registracijo blagovne znamke, se razvrstijo v skladu s sistemom klasifikacije, uvedenim z Nicejskim aranžmajem o mednarodni klasifikaciji proizvodov in storitev zaradi registracije znamk z dne 15. junija 1957 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Nicejska klasifikacija).
The goods and services for which protection is sought shall be identified by the applicant with sufficient clarity and precision to enable the competent authorities and economic operators, on that sole basis, to determine the extent of the protection sought.
Blago in storitve, za katere se zahteva varstvo, prijavitelj dovolj jasno in natančno opredeli, s čimer pristojnim organom in gospodarskim subjektom omogoči, da lahko samo na tej podlagi določijo obseg zahtevanega varstva.
For the purposes of paragraph 2, the general indications included in the class headings of the Nice Classification or other general terms may be used, provided that they comply with the requisite standards of clarity and precision set out in this Article.
Za namene odstavka 2 se lahko uporabljajo splošne oznake, vključene v naslove razredov Nicejske klasifikacije, ali drugi splošni izrazi, če so v skladu z zahtevanimi standardi jasnosti in natančnosti, določenimi v tem členu.
The office shall reject an application in respect of indications or terms which are unclear or imprecise, where the applicant does not suggest an acceptable wording within a period set by the office to that effect.
Urad zavrne prijavo zaradi oznak ali izrazov, ki so nejasni ali nenatančni, če prijavitelj teh oznak ali izrazov ne zamenja z ustreznejšo ubeseditvijo v roku, ki ga v ta namen določi urad.
The use of general terms, including the general indications of the class headings of the Nice Classification, shall be interpreted as including all the goods or services clearly covered by the literal meaning of the indication or term.
Šteje se, da uporaba splošnih izrazov, vključno s splošnimi označbami v naslovih razredov Nicejske klasifikacije, vključuje vse blago ali storitve, ki so jasno zajete z dobesednim pomenom označbe ali izraza.
The use of such terms or indications shall not be interpreted as comprising a claim to goods or services which cannot be so understood.
Prav tako se šteje, da uporaba takih izrazov ali označb ne zajema zahtevka za blago ali storitve, ki se jih ne da tako razumeti.
Where the applicant requests registration for more than one class, the applicant shall group the goods and services according to the classes of the Nice Classification, each group being preceded by the number of the class to which that group of goods or services belongs, and shall present them in the order of the classes.
Kadar prijavitelj zahteva registracijo za več kot en razred, blago in storitve razvrsti glede na razrede Nicejske klasifikacije, pri čemer pred vsako skupino stoji številka razreda, v katerega spada ta skupina blaga ali storitev, različne skupine pa so navedene v vrstnem redu razredov.
Goods and services shall not be regarded as being similar to each other on the ground that they appear in the same class under the Nice Classification.
Za blago in storitve, ki so razvrščeni v isti razred po Nicejski klasifikaciji, ne velja domneva, da so si podobni.
Goods and services shall not be regarded as being dissimilar from each other on the ground that they appear in different classes under the Nice Classification.
Za blago in storitve, ki so razvrščeni v različne razrede po Nicejski klasifikaciji, ne velja domneva, da si niso podobni.
Member States may provide that prior to registration of a trade mark, any natural or legal person and any group or body representing manufacturers, producers, suppliers of services, traders or consumers may submit to the office written observations, explaining on which grounds the trade mark should not be registered ex officio.
Države članice lahko določijo, da lahko pred registracijo blagovne znamke vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba ter vsaka skupina ali organ, ki predstavlja izdelovalce, proizvajalce, ponudnike storitev, trgovce ali potrošnike, uradu predloži pisne pripombe, v katerih razloži, na podlagi katerih razlogov se blagovna znamka ne bi smela registrirati po uradni dolžnosti.
Persons and groups or bodies, as referred to in the first subparagraph, shall not be parties to the proceedings before the office.
Osebe in skupine ali organi iz prvega pododstavka niso stranke v postopku pred uradom.
In addition to the grounds referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, any natural or legal person and any group or body representing manufacturers, producers, suppliers of services, traders or consumers may submit to the office written observations based on the particular grounds on which the application for a collective mark should be refused under Article 31(1) and (2).
Poleg razlogov iz odstavka 1 tega člena lahko vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba ter vsaka skupina ali organ, ki predstavlja izdelovalce, proizvajalce, ponudnike storitev, trgovce ali potrošnike, uradu predloži pisne pripombe, ki temeljijo na posebnih razlogih, zaradi katerih bi bilo treba prijavo kolektivne znamke zavrniti v skladu s členom 31(1) in (2).
This provision may be extended to cover certification and guarantee marks where regulated in Member States.
Te določbe se lahko razširijo tudi na certifikacijske in garancijske znamke, če so te predmet urejanja v državah članicah.
Division of applications and registrations
Razdelitev prijav in registracij
The applicant or proprietor may divide a national trade mark application or registration into two or more separate applications or registrations by sending a declaration to the office and indicating for each divisional application or registration the goods or services covered by the original application or registration which are to be covered by the divisional applications or registrations.
Prijavitelj ali imetnik lahko prijavo ali registracijo nacionalne blagovne znamke razdeli na dve ali več ločenih prijav ali registracij, tako da uradu pošlje izjavo in pri vsaki razdeljeni prijavi ali registraciji navede tisto blago ali storitve, ki jih zajema prvotna prijava oziroma registracija, na katere se bodo nanašale razdeljene prijave ali registracije.
Class fees
Pristojbine za razrede
Member States may provide that the application and renewal of a trade mark is to be subject to an additional fee for each class of goods and services beyond the first class.
Države članice lahko določijo, da se za prijavo in podaljšanje blagovne znamke zaračuna dodatna pristojbina za vsak razred blaga in storitev, ki presega prvi razred.
Procedures for opposition, revocation and invalidity
Postopki za ugovor, razveljavitev in ugotovitev ničnosti
Member States shall provide for an efficient and expeditious administrative procedure before their offices for opposing the registration of a trade mark application on the grounds provided for in Article 5.
Države članice v svojih uradih zagotovijo učinkovit in hiter upravni postopek za ugovarjanje registraciji prijave blagovne znamke na podlagi razlogov iz člena 5.
The administrative procedure referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall at least provide that the proprietor of an earlier trade mark as referred to in Article 5(2) and Article 5(3)(a), and the person authorised under the relevant law to exercise the rights arising from a protected designation of origin or geographical indication as referred to in Article 5(3)(c) shall be entitled to file a notice of opposition.
Upravni postopek iz odstavka 1 tega člena zagotavlja vsaj, da imata imetnik prejšnje blagovne znamke iz člena 5(2) in točke (a) člena 5(3) ter oseba, ki je v skladu z zadevnim pravom pooblaščena za uveljavljanje pravic, ki izhajajo iz zaščitene označbe porekla ali zaščitene geografske označbe iz točke (c) člena 5(3), pravico vložiti ugovor.
A notice of opposition may be filed on the basis of one or more earlier rights, provided that they all belong to the same proprietor, and on the basis of part or the totality of the goods or services in respect of which the earlier right is protected or applied for, and may be directed against part or the totality of the goods or services in respect of which the contested mark is applied for.
Ugovor se lahko vloži na podlagi ene ali več prejšnjih pravic, če je njihov imetnik isti, in na podlagi dela ali vsega blaga ali storitev, za katere je prejšnja pravica varovana ali prijavljena, in se lahko nanaša na del blaga ali storitev ali vse blago ali storitve, za katere se prijavi sporna znamka.
The parties shall be granted, at their joint request, a minimum of two months in the opposition proceedings in order to allow for the possibility of a friendly settlement between the opposing party and the applicant.
Stranka, ki je vložila ugovor, in prijavitelj imata na njuno skupno zahtevo v postopku ugovora na voljo najmanj dva meseca, da lahko preučita možnost morebitne poravnave.
Non-use as defence in opposition proceedings
Neuporaba kot način obrambe v postopkih ugovora
In opposition proceedings pursuant to Article 43, where at the filing date or date of priority of the later trade mark, the five-year period within which the earlier trade mark must have been put to genuine use as provided for in Article 16 had expired, at the request of the applicant, the proprietor of the earlier trade mark who has given notice of opposition shall furnish proof that the earlier trade mark has been put to genuine use as provided for in Article 16 during the five-year period preceding the filing date or date of priority of the later trade mark, or that proper reasons for non-use existed.
V postopku ugovora v skladu s členom 43 imetnik prejšnje blagovne znamke, ki je vložil ugovor, na zahtevo prijavitelja predloži dokaz, da se je prejšnja blagovna znamka v skladu s členom 16 resno in dejansko začela uporabljati v petletnem obdobju pred datumom vložitve ali datumom prednostne pravice poznejše blagovne znamke ali da so obstajali upravičeni razlogi za neuporabo, če je petletno obdobje, v katerem bi se prejšnja blagovna znamka morala resno in dejansko začeti uporabljati, kakor je določeno v členu 16, na datum vložitve ali datum prednostne pravice poznejše blagovne znamke že poteklo.
In the absence of proof to this effect, the opposition shall be rejected.
Če takšnega dokaza ni, se ugovor zavrne.
If the earlier trade mark has been used in relation to only part of the goods or services for which it is registered, it shall, for the purpose of the examination of the opposition as provided for in paragraph 1, be deemed to be registered in respect of that part of the goods or services only.
Če se je prejšnja blagovna znamka uporabljala le za del blaga ali storitev, za katere je registrirana, se za namene preverjanja ugovora iz odstavka 1 šteje, da je registrirana le za ta del blaga ali storitev.
Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article shall also apply where the earlier trade mark is an EU trade mark.
Odstavka 1 in 2 tega člena se uporabljata tudi, kadar je prejšnja blagovna znamka blagovna znamka EU.
In such a case, the genuine use of the EU trade mark shall be determined in accordance with Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
V takem primeru se resno in dejansko uporabo blagovne znamke EU ugotavlja v skladu s členom 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009.
Procedure for revocation or declaration of invalidity
Postopek za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti
Without prejudice to the right of the parties to appeal to the courts, Member States shall provide for an efficient and expeditious administrative procedure before their offices for the revocation or declaration of invalidity of a trade mark.
Brez poseganja v pravico strank do pritožbe na sodišče, države članice pred svojimi uradi zagotovijo učinkovit in hiter upravni postopek za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti blagovne znamke.
The administrative procedure for revocation shall provide that the trade mark is to be revoked on the grounds provided for in Articles 19 and 20.
Upravni postopek za razveljavitev določa, da se blagovna znamka razveljavi na podlagi razlogov iz členov 19 in 20.
The administrative procedure for invalidity shall provide that the trade mark is to be declared invalid at least on the following grounds:
Upravni postopek za ugotovitev ničnosti določa, da se blagovna znamka ugotovi za nično vsaj na podlagi naslednjih razlogov:
the trade mark should not have been registered because it does not comply with the requirements provided for in Article 4;
blagovna znamka ne bi smela biti registrirana, ker ni skladna z zahtevami iz člena 4;
the trade mark should not have been registered because of the existence of an earlier right within the meaning of Article 5(1) to (3).
blagovna znamka ne bi smela biti registrirana, ker obstaja prejšnja pravica v smislu člena 5(1) do (3).
The administrative procedure shall provide that at least the following are to be entitled to file an application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity:
Upravni postopek določi, da imajo pravico vložiti zahtevo za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti vsaj naslednje osebe:
in the case of paragraph 2 and paragraph 3(a), any natural or legal person and any group or body set up for the purpose of representing the interests of manufacturers, producers, suppliers of services, traders or consumers, and which, under the terms of the law governing it, has the capacity to sue in its own name and to be sued;
v primeru odstavka 2 in točke (a) odstavka 3 vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba ter vsaka skupina ali organ, ki je ustanovljen za predstavljanje interesov izdelovalcev, proizvajalcev, ponudnikov storitev, trgovcev ali potrošnikov, ki je sposoben, da v lastnem imenu toži in da je tožen v skladu s pravom, ki to ureja;
in the case of paragraph 3(b) of this Article, the proprietor of an earlier trade mark as referred to in Article 5(2) and Article 5(3)(a), and the person authorised under the relevant law to exercise the rights arising from a protected designation of origin or geographical indication as referred to in Article 5(3)(c).
v primeru točke (b) odstavka 3 tega člena imetnik prejšnje blagovne znamke iz člena 5(2) in točke (a) člena 5(3) ter oseba, ki je v skladu z zadevnim pravom pooblaščena za uveljavljanje pravic, ki izhajajo iz zaščitene označbe porekla ali zaščitene geografske označbe iz točke (c) člena 5(3).
An application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity may be directed against a part or the totality of the goods or services in respect of which the contested mark is registered.
Zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti se lahko nanaša na del blaga ali storitev ali vse blago ali storitve, za katere je sporna znamka registrirana.
An application for a declaration of invalidity may be filed on the basis of one or more earlier rights, provided they all belong to the same proprietor.
Zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti se lahko vloži na podlagi ene ali več prejšnjih pravic, če je njihov imetnik isti.
Non-use as a defence in proceedings seeking a declaration of invalidity
Neuporaba kot način obrambe v postopku za ugotovitev ničnosti