natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission rejects these arguments of ET Solar for following reasons.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 63 zgoraj, osnovna protidampinška uredba in osnovna protisubvencijska uredba ne vsebujeta nobene zahteve glede minimalnega deleža prodaje pri oceni kršitve zaveze.
The size of the breach is irrelevant.
Poleg tega domnevno marginalne količine, navedene v uvodni izjavi 67 zgoraj, niso zanemarljive, ampak ustrezajo precejšnji količini v več polnih zabojnikih.
As mentioned in recital 63 above, the basic anti-dumping Regulation and the basic anti-subsidy Regulation contain no requirement for a minimum percentage of sales in the assessment of a breach of an undertaking.
Razen tega, družba ET Solar ni mogla izključiti možnosti, da so bile pomembne količine solarnih modulov, ki so bile carinjene, ne da bi bile predmet ukrepov, prodane istim strankam, ki so kupile tudi zajeti izdelek; zato pojasnila družbe ET Solar kažejo, da so bila kršena tudi pravila o tveganju navzkrižne kompenzacije.
Furthermore, the allegedly marginal quantities referred to in recital 67 above are not negligible, but correspond to a sizeable amount of several full containers.
Sončni parki, ki jih prodaja družba ET Solar, so v glavnem sestavljeni iz modulov, ki so bili uvoženi v skladu z zavezo.
In addition, ET Solar could not exclude that significant quantities of solar modules customs-cleared without having been subject to the measures were sold to the same customers that also purchased the product covered; therefore, ET Solar's explanations show that the rules on the risk of cross-compensation have also been violated.
Družba ET Solar je bila v okviru zaveze dolžna poročati o prodaji teh modulov.
Solar parks sold by ET Solar mainly consist of modules imported under the undertaking.
Poleg tega zaveza jasno in brez izjeme določa, da je mogoče isti stranki prodati „druge izdelke“ samo v obsegu, ki je skladen z omejitvijo vzporedne prodaje, da se prepreči tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije.
ET Solar was obliged to report the sales of these modules under the undertaking.
Zato Komisija potrjuje svoj sklep, da je družba ET Solar s prodajo modulov v sončnih parkih kršila zavezo, in tudi s tem, da o tej prodaji ni poročala.
Moreover, the undertaking clearly provides, without exception, that no more than the parallel sales limit of ‘other products’ can be sold to the same customer to avoid the risk of cross-compensation.
Posledično Komisija prav tako potrjuje sklepe o kršitvi MIP in neizvedljivosti zaveze s strani družbe ET Solar v praksi.
Therefore the Commission upholds the conclusion that ET Solar breached the undertaking by selling modules to solar parks and by non-reporting these sales.
Družba ReneSola je navedla, da njen poslovni model, v okviru katerega proizvaja module z uporabo lastne proizvodne zmogljivosti v LRK in široke mreže nepovezanih proizvajalcev originalne opreme v tretjih državah in Uniji, ni nov in je bil vzpostavljen, preden je zaveza začela veljati.
In consequence, the Commission also upholds the conclusions on the breach of the MIP and impracticability if ET Solar's undertaking.
Družba ReneSola je trdila, da tak poslovni model do novembra 2014 ni bil izrecno prepovedan.
ReneSola submitted that their business model, whereby they produce modules using their own production capacities in the PRC and an extensive network of unrelated OEMs in third countries and in the Union is not new and has been in place before the undertaking entered into force.
Družba ReneSola je navedla, da se je pripravljena zavezati k temu, da na trgu Unije ne bo prodajala modulov, ki jih proizvajajo njihovi proizvajalci originalne opreme v tretjih državah.
ReneSola argued that such a business model had not been explicitly prohibited until November 2014.
Vendar pa je družba ReneSola izrazila zanimanje za proizvodnjo, ki bi jo izvajali proizvajalci originalne opreme v Uniji, za prodajo na trgu Unije.
ReneSola submitted also that they are ready to commit to not selling on the Union market the modules produced by their OEMs in third countries.
Družba ReneSola je izrazila pripravljenost za poenostavitev svojega poslovnega modela, da bi tako postalo spremljanje zaveze izvedljivo v praksi.
ReneSola expressed however interest in using the OEM production in the Union for sales on the Union market.
Da bi se izognila morebitnim navzkrižnim kompenzacijam, je družba ReneSola izrazila pripravljenost, da razvije „notranji požarni zid“, ki bi preprečil prodajo iz različnih virov isti družbi, družbam v isti skupini ali prodajo za lastne projekte.
ReneSola offered to undertake the simplification of their business model to render the monitoring of the undertaking practicable.
Družba ReneSola je bila pripravljena tudi zagotoviti, da bodo njihovi proizvajalci originalne opreme v Uniji sodelovali s Komisijo.
To avoid potential cross-compensations, ReneSola offered to develop an ‘internal firewall’ that is prohibiting sales from different sources to the same company, to companies in the same group, or selling to their own projects.
Komisija iz naslednjih razlogov zavrača te trditve.
ReneSola offered also to ensure that their OEM producers in the Union cooperate with the Commission.
Spremljanje tako obsežnega poslovnega modela, ki vključuje proizvajalce originalne opreme, je v praksi še vedno neizvedljivo, kot je bilo že razloženo v uvodnih izjavah 26 do 28 zgoraj.
The Commission rejects these arguments for the following reasons.
Kljub zavezam, ki jih je predlagala družba ReneSola, bi bilo zaradi udeležbe proizvajalcev originalne opreme v Uniji spremljanje zaveze v praksi neizvedljivo.
The monitoring of such extensive OEM business model remains impracticable as already explained in recitals 26 to 28 above.
Dejavnosti proizvajalcev originalne opreme, tudi tistih v Uniji, niso predmet zaveze, zato niso predmet spremljanja s strani Komisije.
Despite the commitments offered by ReneSola, using an OEM in the Union would render the monitoring of the undertaking impracticable.
Trditev družbe ReneSola o „notranjem požarnem zidu“ ni bila podprta z dokazi in nadaljnjo razlago.
The activities of OEMs, even in the Union, fall outside the scope of the undertaking, hence they fall outside monitoring by the Commission.
Poleg tega dejstvo, da je bilo novembra 2014 predloženo pojasnilo, ne pomeni, da obsežna uporaba proizvajalcev originalne opreme s strani družbe ReneSola pred novembrom 2014 ni preprečevala izvedljivosti zaveze v praksi.
ReneSola's argument of the ‘internal firewall’ was not supported by any evidence and further explanation.
To je mogoče dokazati na podlagi dejstva, da družba ReneSola ne zanika, da proizvajalci originalne opreme s sedežem v tretjih državah pri svoji proizvodnji vsaj delno uporabljajo celice s poreklom v LRK, kot je razvidno iz podatkov, ki jih je družba ReneSola predložila pred preveritvenim obiskom.
In addition, the clarification given in November 2014 does not imply that the extensive OEM practice of ReneSola was not rendering the undertaking impracticable before.
V praksi ni izvedljivo spremljati, da moduli, ki sestavljajo te celice, niso bili dobavljeni v Unijo.
That can be illustrated by the fact that ReneSola does not dispute that the OEMs located in third countries use at least partially cells with origin in the PRC in their production, as can be seen from the pre-verification data submitted by ReneSola.
Družba ReneSola je navedla tudi dodatne informacije o specifični pošiljki, v zvezi s katero so v četrtletnih poročilih predložili zavajajoče informacije.
It is impracticable to monitor that modules comprising those cells have not been supplied to the Union.
Prav tako je trdila, da se to ni zgodilo namenoma, kot vzroke pa je navedla napačno razumevanje zaveze in morebitno malomarnost.
ReneSola submitted also additional information about a specific shipment for which they provided misleading information in their quarterly reports.
Družba ReneSola je trdila, da je izvajanje zaveze zapleteno ter pri tem navedla, da obstajajo ločene obveznosti o poročanju za potrdila in račune na podlagi zaveze, v postopku poročanja in odprave pomanjkljivosti pa je udeleženih več strani.
ReneSola submitted that this was non-intentional and caused by a misunderstanding of the undertaking and maybe negligence.
Komisija iz naslednjih razlogov zavrača te razloge.
ReneSola submitted also that the implementation of the undertaking is complicated, stating that there are separate reporting obligations on the undertaking certificates and invoices, and both in the process of reporting and rectification several parties are involved.
Družba ReneSola ni odpravila pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z informacijami (o odpovedi ali spremembi pošiljk), ki so bile navedene v njenih četrtletnih poročilih, kakor je razvidno iz evidenc o transakcijah povezanega uvoznika.
The Commission rejects this argument for the following reasons.
Zato četrtletna poročila družbe ReneSola ne odražajo dejanskih prodajnih transakcij.
ReneSola has not rectified the information (cancellation or modification of shipments) provided in their quarterly reports, according to their related importer's transactions records.
Družba ReneSola je obvestila CCCME o precejšnji razliki med dobavljeno količino in ustreznim potrdilom na podlagi zaveze ter prosila za nasvet glede odprave pomanjkljivosti šele, ko je Komisija opravila obisk na kraju samem.
Hence, ReneSola's quarterly reports do not reflect the actual sales transactions.
Zato Komisija vztraja pri oceni, da je družba ReneSola kršila zavezo z nepopolnim in napačnim poročanjem o prodaji.
ReneSola informed the CCCME on the significant difference of the quantity delivered and the relevant undertaking certificate, and asked advice to rectify the situation only after the Commission's on the spot visit.
Pripombe drugih zainteresiranih strani
Therefore, the Commission upholds the assessment of the breach of the ReneSola's undertaking by incomplete and erroneous reporting of sales.
Ena od zainteresiranih strani je od Komisije zahtevala, da ta umakne sprejetje zaveze za vse tri proizvajalce izvoznike z retroaktivnim učinkom od datuma prve evidentirane kršitve ali vsaj od začetka preverjanja, da bi se nadomestila škoda, povzročena proračunu EU, ki je nastala zaradi domnevno utajenih uvoznih dajatev.
Comments by other interested parties
Komisija zavrača to zahtevo, ker ni razlogov za razveljavitev morebitnih računov na podlagi zaveze, ki so jih izdali trije proizvajalci izvozniki do dneva začetka veljavnosti te uredbe, s katerimi bi bilo mogoče utemeljiti retroaktivno pobiranje dajatev.
One interested party requested the Commission to withdraw the acceptance of the undertaking for the three exporting producers with retroactive effect from the date of the first documented violation or at least from the start of the verification exercise, to compensate the damage to the Union budget resulting from allegedly evaded import duties.
Druga zainteresirana stran je pozvala Komisijo, naj odobri prehodno obdobje pred začetkom veljavnosti protidampinških in izravnalnih dajatev, da bi lahko uvozniki v razumnem roku izvedli ali odpovedali obstoječe pogodbene dogovore in poiskali druge dobavitelje.
The Commission rejects that request as there are no grounds for invalidating any undertaking invoices issued by the three exporting producers until the day of entry into force of this Regulation, which could justify a retroactive collection of duties.
Komisija zavrača to zahtevo, ker se v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe v primeru umika sprejetja zaveze protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve začnejo uporabljati avtomatično, pravna podlaga za kakršno koli prehodno obdobje pa ne obstaja.
Another interested party urged the Commission to allow for a transitional period before the anti-dumping and countervailing duties are applicable in order to enable importers to reasonably execute or terminate existing contractual arrangements and find alternative suppliers.
Poleg tega je uvoznik odgovoren tako za plačilo uvoznih dajatev kot tudi za pravilnost dokumentov, ki jih predloži carinskim organom.
The Commission rejects this request as pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation in the case of withdrawal of acceptance of the undertaking the anti-dumping and countervailing duties shall automatically apply and there is no legal basis for any transitional period.
Unija ne more prevzeti negativnih posledic zaradi nedopustnega ravnanja njegovih pogodbenih partnerjev.
Moreover, the importer is responsible both for payment of the import duties and for the regularity of the documents presented by it to the customs authorities.
Možnost, da se cenovna zaveza lahko umakne, je poslovno tveganje, povezano z uvozništvom.
The adverse consequences of wrongful acts of its contractual partners cannot be borne by the Union.
Sklep
The possibility that a price undertaking may be withdrawn is a trade risk inherent in the importation business.
Kljub zgornjim navedbam Komisija potrjuje svoje ugotovitve o kršitvah zaveze in njeni neizvedljivosti v praksi za družbe Canadian Solar, ET Solar in ReneSola.
Conclusion
Komisija prav tako potrjuje sklep, da je kombinacija dejanj, ki so jih izvedle družbe Canadian Solar, ET Solar in ReneSola, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah 15 do 32, ogrozila zaupanje v odnosu do vsakega od teh treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Despite of the above submissions the Commission upholds its findings on breaches of the undertaking and its impracticability established for Canadian Solar, ET Solar, and ReneSola.
S tem je utemeljen umik sprejetja zaveze za te tri proizvajalce izvoznike v skladu s pogoji zaveze.
The Commission also upholds the conclusion that the combination of actions by Canadian Solar, ET Solar, and ReneSola listed in recitals 15 to 32 above harmed the relationship of trust with each of these three exporting producers.
H. UMIK SPREJETJA ZAVEZE IN NALOŽITEV DOKONČNIH DAJATEV
That justifies as such the withdrawal of acceptances of the undertaking for these three exporting producers pursuant to the terms of the undertaking.
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe ter tudi v skladu s pogoji zaveze sklenila, da se sprejetje zaveze za družbe Canadian Solar, ET Solar in ReneSola, umakne.
H. WITHDRAWAL OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING AND IMPOSITIONS OF DEFINITIVE DUTIES
V skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe se dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013, in dokončna izravnalna dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013, začneta avtomatično uporabljati za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK ali ki je od tam poslan in ga proizvajajo družbe Canadian Solar (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B805), ET Solar (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B819) in ReneSola (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B921) z dnem začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and also in accordance with the terms of the undertaking, the Commission has concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking for Canadian Solar, ET Solar, and ReneSola shall be withdrawn.
V informativne namene so v tabeli v Prilogi k tej uredbi navedeni proizvajalci izvozniki, za katere se sprejetje zaveze z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2014/657/EU ne spremeni –
Accordingly, pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Article 1 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 automatically apply to imports originating in or consigned from the PRC of the product concerned and produced by Canadian Solar (TARIC additional code: B805), ET Solar (TARIC additional code: B819), and ReneSola (TARIC additional code: B921) as of the day of entry into force of this Regulation.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
For information purposes the table in Annex to this Regulation lists the exporting producers for whom the acceptance of the undertaking by Commission Implementing Decision 2014/657/EU is not affected,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Sprejetje zaveze v zvezi z družbami (i) CSI Solar Power (Kitajska) Inc., Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc., Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc., in CSI Cells Co.
Article 1
Ltd, ki so združeno zajete z dodatno oznako TARIC: B805; (ii) ET Solar Industry Limited in ET Energy Co.
Acceptance of the undertaking in relation to (i) CSI Solar Power (China) Inc., Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc., Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc., and CSI Cells Co.
Ltd, ki sta združeno zajeti z dodatno oznako TARIC B819, ter (iii) Renesola Zhejiang Ltd in Renesola Jiangsu Ltd, ki sta združeno zajeti z dodatno oznako TARIC B921, se s tem umakne.
Ltd jointly covered by TARIC additional code: B805; (ii) ET Solar Industry Limited and ET Energy Co.
Člen 2
Ltd jointly covered by the TARIC additional code B819; and (iii) Renesola Zhejiang Ltd and Renesola Jiangsu Ltd jointly covered by the TARIC additional code B921 is hereby withdrawn.
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 4. junija 2015
Done at Brussels, 4 June 2015.
Predsednik
OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.
UL L 152, 5.6.2013, str. 5.
OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.
UL L 209, 3.8.2013, str. 26.
OJ L 152, 5.6.2013, p. 5.
UL L 209, 3.8.2013, str. 1.
OJ L 209, 3.8.2013, p. 26.
UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str. 1.
OJ L 209, 3.8.2013, p. 1.
UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str. 66.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 1.
UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str. 214.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 66.
UL L 270, 11.9.2014, str. 6.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 214.
PRILOGA
OJ L 270, 11.9.2014, p. 6.
Seznam družb
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/867
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/867
amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for 2,4,5-T, barban, binapacryl, bromophos-ethyl, camphechlor (toxaphene), chlorbufam, chloroxuron, chlozolinate, DNOC, di-allate, dinoseb, dinoterb, dioxathion, ethylene oxide, fentin acetate, fentin hydroxide, flucycloxuron, flucythrinate, formothion, mecarbam, methacrifos, monolinuron, phenothrin, propham, pyrazophos, quinalphos, resmethrin, tecnazene and vinclozolin in or on certain products
o spremembi prilog II, III in V k Uredbi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 396/2005 glede mejnih vrednosti ostankov za 2,4,5-T, barban, binapakril, bromofos-etil, kamfeklor (toksafen), klorbufam, kloroksuron, klozolinat, DNOC, dialat, dinozeb, dinoterb, dioksation, etilen oksid, fentin acetat, fentin hidroksid, flucikloksuron, flucitrinat, formotion, mekarbam, metakrifos, monolinuron, fenotrin, profam, pirazofos, kvinalfos, resmetrin, teknazen in vinklozolin v ali na nekaterih proizvodih
For 2,4,5-T, barban, binapacryl, bromophos-ethyl, camphechlor (toxaphene), chlorbufam, chloroxuron, chlozolinate, DNOC, di-allate, dinoseb, dinoterb, dioxathion, ethylene oxide, fentin acetate, fentin hydroxide, flucythrinate, formothion, mecarbam, methacrifos, monolinuron, propham, pyrazophos, quinalphos, resmethrin and tecnazene maximum residue levels (MRLs) were set in Annex II and Part B of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
Mejne vrednosti ostankov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: MRL) za 2,4,5-T, barban, binapakril, bromofos-etil, kamfeklor (toksafen), klorbufam, kloroksuron, klozolinat, DNOC, dialat, dinozeb, dinoterb, dioksation, etilen oksid, fentin acetat, fentin hidroksid, flucitrinat, formotion, mekarbam, metakrifos, monolinuron, profam, pirazofos, kvinalfos, resmetrin in teknazen so bile določene v Prilogi II in delu B Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 396/2005.
For flucycloxuron and phenothrin MRLs were set in Part A of Annex III to that Regulation.
Za flucikloksuron in fenotrin so bile MRL določene v delu A Priloge III k navedeni uredbi.
For vinclozolin MRLs were set in Annex V to that Regulation.
Za vinklozolin so bile MRL določene v Prilogi V k navedeni uredbi.
All existing authorisations for plant protection products containing those active substances have been revoked.
Vse obstoječe registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedene aktivne snovi, so bile preklicane.
The Commission consulted the European Union reference laboratories as regards the need to adapt certain limits of determination (LODs).
Komisija se je glede potrebe po prilagoditvi nekaterih mej določanja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: LOD) posvetovala z referenčnimi laboratoriji Evropske unije.
As regards several substances, those laboratories concluded that for certain commodities technical development permits the setting of lower LODs.
Pri številnih snoveh so navedeni laboratoriji ugotovili, da je zaradi tehničnega razvoja za nekatere proizvode mogoče določiti nižje LOD.
For binapacryl, dinoseb, fentin acetate and fentin hydroxide the European Union reference laboratories proposed to change the residue definition.
Referenčni laboratoriji Evropske unije so za binapakril, dinozeb, fentin acetat in fentin hidroksid predlagali spremembo opredelitve ostankov.
For those active substances for which all MRLs should be reduced to the relevant LOD, default values should be listed in Annex V in accordance with Article 18(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
Za aktivne snovi, za katere bi bilo treba vse MRL znižati do ustrezne LOD, bi bilo treba navesti privzete vrednosti v Prilogi V v skladu s členom 18(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 396/2005.
Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as it stood before being amended by this Regulation shall continue to apply to products which were lawfully produced before 30 June 2015.
Različica Uredbe (ES) št. 396/2005 pred spremembami s to uredbo se še naprej uporablja za proizvode, ki so bili zakonito proizvedeni pred 30. junijem 2015.
It shall apply from 30 December 2015.
Uporablja se od 30. decembra 2015.
In Annex II, the columns for 2,4,5-T, barban, binapacryl, bromophos-ethyl, camphechlor (toxaphene), chlorbufam, chloroxuron, chlozolinate, DNOC, di-allate, dinoseb, dinoterb, dioxathion, ethylene oxide, fentin acetate, fentin hydroxide, flucythrinate, formothion, mecarbam, methacrifos, monolinuron, propham, pyrazophos, quinalphos, resmethrin and tecnazene are deleted.
V Prilogi II se stolpci za 2,4,5-T, barban, binapakril, bromofos-etil, kamfeklor (toksafen), klorbufam, kloroksuron, klozolinat, DNOC, dialat, dinozeb, dinoterb, dioksation, etilen oksid, fentin acetat, fentin hidroksid, flucitrinat, formotion, mekarbam, metakrifos, monolinuron, profam, pirazofos, kvinalfos, resmetrin in teknazen črtajo.
In Part A, the columns for flucycloxuron and phenothrin are deleted.
v delu A se stolpca za flucikloksuron in fenotrin črtata;
In Part B, the columns for 2,4,5-T, barban, binapacryl, bromophos-ethyl, camphechlor (toxaphene), chlorbufam, chloroxuron, chlozolinate, DNOC, di-allate, dinoseb, dinoterb, dioxathion, ethylene oxide, fentin acetate, fentin hydroxide, flucythrinate, formothion, mecarbam, methacrifos, monolinuron, propham, pyrazophos, quinalphos, resmethrin and tecnazene are deleted.
v delu B se stolpci za 2,4,5-T, barban, binapakril, bromofos-etil, kamfeklor (toksafen), klorbufam, kloroksuron, klozolinat, DNOC, dialat, dinozeb, dinoterb, dioksation, etilen oksid, fentin acetat, fentin hidroksid, flucitrinat, formotion, mekarbam, metakrifos, monolinuron, profam, pirazofos, kvinalfos, resmetrin in teknazen črtajo.
the column for vinclozolin is replaced by the following:
stolpec za vinklozolin se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Lemons (Citron, lemon, Buddha's hand (Citrus medica var. sarcodactylis))
Limone (citrona, limona, Budova roka (Citrus medica var. sarcodactylis))
Mandarins (Clementine, tangerine, mineola and other hybrids tangor (Citrus reticulata × sinensis))
Mandarine (klementine, tangerine, mineole in drugi hibridi, tangor (Citrus reticulata × sinensis))
Beetroot
Korenje
Carrots
Gomoljna zelena