natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 8b(1) of Directive 2008/105/EC provides for the establishment of a watch list of, in the first instance, up to 10 substances or groups of substances for which Union-wide monitoring data are to be gathered for the purpose of supporting future prioritisation exercises in accordance with Article 16(2) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
V členu 8b(1) Direktive 2008/105/ES je navedeno, da se določi nadzorni seznam snovi, ki najprej vsebuje do 10 snovi ali skupin snovi, za katere se zaradi podpore prihodnjemu izvajanju prednostnega razvrščanja v skladu s členom 16(2) Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/60/ES [2] zbirajo podatki o spremljanju iz celotne Unije.
The list should include an indication of the monitoring matrices and possible methods of analysis not entailing excessive costs.
Ta seznam bi moral vključevati navedbe medijev spremljanja in mogočih analitskih metod, ki niso nesorazmerno drage.
Article 8b of Directive 2008/105/EC specifies, inter alia, the conditions and modalities for the monitoring of the substances included in the watch list, for the reporting of the monitoring results by the Member States, and for the updating of the list.
Člen 8b Direktive 2008/105/ES med drugim določa pogoje in načine spremljanja snovi na nadzornem seznamu za poročanje držav članic o rezultatih spremljanja in za posodabljanje seznama.
The substances in the watch list should be selected from amongst those for which the information available indicates that they may pose a significant risk, at Union level, to or via the aquatic environment, but for which monitoring data are insufficient to come to a conclusion on the actual risk posed.
Snovi, ki se vključijo na nadzorni seznam, bi se morale izbrati med snovmi, za katere razpoložljive informacije kažejo, da bi lahko na ravni Unije pomenile znatno tveganje za vodno okolje ali tveganje, ki se prenaša po vodnem okolju, vendar za katere ni dovolj podatkov o spremljanju, da bi se ugotovilo resnično tveganje.
Highly toxic substances, used in many Member States and discharged to the aquatic environment but not or rarely monitored, should be considered for inclusion in the watch list.
Treba bi bilo razmisliti o tem, da se na nadzorni seznam vključijo zelo strupene snovi, ki se uporabljajo v številnih državah članicah in odvajajo v vodno okolje, vendar se spremljajo le redko ali nikoli.
That selection process should take into account information as itemised in points (a) to (e) of Article 8b(1) of Directive 2008/105/EC, giving particular consideration to emerging pollutants.
Pri navedenem izbirnem postopku bi bilo treba upoštevati informacije, naštete v točkah (a) do (e) člena 8b(1) Direktive 2008/105/ES, predvsem kar zadeva nova onesnaževala.
The monitoring of the substances in the watch list should generate high-quality data on their concentrations in the aquatic environment, fit for the purpose of supporting, in a separate review exercise according to Article 16(4) of Directive 2000/60/EC, the risk assessments that underpin the identification of priority substances.
S spremljanjem snovi z nadzornega seznama bi se morali zbrati visokokakovostni podatki o njihovih koncentracijah v vodnem okolju, ki bodo v okviru ločenega pregleda v skladu s členom 16(4) Direktive 2000/60/ES primerni za podporo ocen tveganj, na katerih temelji opredelitev prednostnih snovi.
In that review, substances found to pose a significant risk should be considered for inclusion in the priority substances list.
V navedenem pregledu bi bilo treba razmisliti o vključitvi snovi, za katere je ugotovljeno, da pomenijo znatno tveganje, na seznam prednostnih snovi.
An environmental quality standard would then also be set, which Member States would have to meet.
Določil bi se tudi okoljski standard kakovosti, ki bi ga morale izpolnjevati države članice.
The proposal of a substance for inclusion in the priority substances list would be subject to an impact assessment.
Za predlagano vključitev snovi na seznam prednostnih snovi bi se izvedla presoja vpliva.
In accordance with Article 8b(1) of Directive 2008/105/EC, diclofenac, 17-beta-estradiol (E2) and 17-alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2) should be included in the first watch list, in order to gather monitoring data for the purpose of facilitating the determination of appropriate measures to address the risk posed by those substances.
V skladu s členom 8b(1) Direktive 2008/105/ES bi bilo treba na prvi nadzorni seznam vključiti diklofenak, 17-beta-estradiol (E2) in 17-alfa-etinilestradiol (EE2), da bi se zbrali podatki o spremljanju za lažjo določitev ustreznih ukrepov za odpravljanje tveganja v zvezi s temi snovmi.
Estrone (E1) should also be included in the watch list because of its close chemical relationship to 17-beta-estradiol, of which it is a breakdown product.
Na nadzorni seznam bi bilo treba vključiti tudi estron (E1) zaradi tesne kemijske sorodnosti s 17-beta-estradiolom, saj je njegov razgradni produkt.
During 2014, the Commission gathered data on a range of other substances that could be included in the watch list.
V letu 2014 je Komisija zbrala podatke o številnih drugih snoveh, ki bi se lahko vključile na nadzorni seznam.
It took account of the information sources referred to in Article 8b(1) of Directive 2008/105/EC, and consulted experts from Member States, and stakeholder groups.
Upoštevala je vire informacij iz člena 8b(1) Direktive 2008/105/ES ter se posvetovala s strokovnjaki iz držav članic in s skupinami deležnikov.
A ranking process was conducted.
Izveden je bil postopek razvrstitve.
This considered in particular substances which came close to being prioritised in the most recently completed priority substances review, but for which monitoring data were still needed to confirm a significant risk.
Pri njem so se obravnavale zlasti snovi, ki so bile v zadnjem pregledu prednostnih snovi skoraj prednostno razvrščene, vendar so bili za potrditev znatnega tveganja še vedno potrebni podatki o njihovem spremljanju.
It also considered several other substances identified as potential emerging pollutants, for which few or no recent monitoring data were available.
Obravnavale so tudi številne druge snovi, opredeljene kot morebitna nova onesnaževala, za katere je bilo na voljo malo najnovejših podatkov o spremljanju ali pa nobeden.
The risk posed by each of those substances was calculated from the available information on their intrinsic hazard and the exposure of the environment to them.
Tveganje v zvezi z vsako od navedenih snovi je bilo izračunano na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij o nevarnosti, ki jo pomenijo, in izpostavljenosti okolja tem snovem.
Exposure was estimated from data on the extent of production and use, taking account of any actual monitoring data.
Izpostavljenost je bila ocenjena na podlagi podatkov o obsegu proizvodnje in uporabe, pri čemer so se upoštevali vsi aktualni podatki o spremljanju.
In the course of gathering data on the substances in the initial list, additional monitoring data were found for some of those substances.
Pri zbiranju podatkov o snoveh na prvem seznamu so bili najdeni dodatni podatki o spremljanju za nekatere od navedenih snovi.
The availability of reliable, up-to-date data for at least four Member States was considered sufficient for not including substances in the watch list.
Razpoložljivost zanesljivih, posodobljenih podatkov za vsaj štiri države članice je zadostovala za nevključitev snovi na nadzorni seznam.
When those substances were discounted, along with some others for which there was particular doubt about their toxicity, or whose use was expected to be discontinued, the following were identified as the most highly ranked: oxadiazon, methiocarb, 2,6-ditert-butyl-4-methylphenol, tri-allate, four neonicotinoid pesticides, the macrolide antibiotic erythromycin, and 2-ethylhexyl 4-methoxycinnamate.
Po opustitvi navedenih snovi in nekaterih snovi, katerih toksičnost je bila še posebej dvomljiva ali katerih uporaba naj bi bila prekinjena, so se najvišje uvrstile naslednje snovi: oksadiazon, metiokarb, 2,6-ditert-butil-4-metilfenol, trialat, štirje neonikotinoidni pesticidi, makrolidni antibiotik eritromicin in 2-etilheksil 4-metoksicinamat.
Those substances should therefore also be included in the watch list, identified by their Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) and EU numbers.
Navedene snovi bi bilo zato treba vključiti na nadzorni seznam in navesti njihovo številko CAS (Chemical Abstract Service) in številko EU.
A fifth neonicotinoid pesticide and two other macrolide antibiotics were also determined to potentially pose a significant risk.
Tudi za peti neonikotinoidni pesticid in dva druga makrolidna antibiotika je bilo ugotovljeno, da pomenijo morebitno znatno tveganje.
The possibility that substances with the same mode of action could have additive effects additionally justifies proposing their simultaneous inclusion in the watch list.
Možnost, da snovi z enakim načinom delovanja lahko delujejo aditivno, je dodaten razlog, da se predlaga njihova istočasna vključitev na nadzorni seznam.
It should be possible to analyse the neonicotinoids simultaneously, and likewise the macrolide antibiotics, allowing them to be grouped in the list.
Obstajati bi morala možnost za istočasno analizo neonikotinoidov in podobno tudi makrolidnih antibiotikov, s čimer bi se lahko skupinsko uvrstili na seznam.
In accordance with Article 8b(1) of Directive 2008/105/EC, the Commission has identified possible methods of analysis for the proposed substances.
V skladu s členom 8b(1) Direktive 2008/105/ES je Komisija opredelila mogoče analitske metode za predlagane snovi.
The method detection limit should be at least as low as the substance-specific predicted no-effect concentration for each substance in the relevant matrix.
Meja zaznavnosti metode bi morala biti vsaj tako nizka kot predvidena koncentracija brez učinka za vsako snov v ustreznem mediju.
If new information leads to a decrease in the predicted no-effect concentration for particular substances, the maximum acceptable method detection limit might have to be lowered while those substances remain on the list.
Če bi nove informacije privedle do zmanjšanja predvidene koncentracije brez učinka za posamezno snov, bi bilo morda treba znižati najvišjo mejo zaznavnosti metode, vendar bi navedene snovi ostale na seznamu.
The analytical methods are not considered to entail excessive costs.
Šteje se, da stroški analitskih metod niso pretirani.
For comparability, all substances should be monitored in whole water samples.
Za primerljivost bi bilo treba vse snovi spremljati v celotnem vzorcu vode.
However, it would be appropriate to monitor 2-ethylhexyl 4-methoxycinnamate also in suspended particulate matter or sediment, because of its tendency to partition into this matrix.
Snov 2-etilheksil 4-metoksicinamat pa bi bilo primerno spremljati tudi v lebdečih delcih ali usedlini, saj se običajno izloča v tem mediju.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 21(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega na podlagi člena 21(1) Direktive 2000/60/ES –
The first watch list of substances for Union-wide monitoring referred to in Article 8b of Directive 2008/105/EC is set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Prvi nadzorni seznam snovi za spremljanje na ravni Unije iz člena 8b Direktive 2008/105/ES je določen v Prilogi k temu sklepu.
OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p. 84.
UL L 348, 24.12.2008, str. 84.
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1).
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/60/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike (UL L 327, 22.12.2000, str. 1).
Watch list of substances for Union-wide monitoring as set out in Article 8b of Directive 2008/105/EC
Nadzorni seznam snovi za spremljanje na ravni Unije, kot je določen v členu 8b Direktive 2008/105/ES
Name of substance/group of substances
Ime snovi/skupine snovi
Indicative analytical method [3] [4] [5]
Okvirna analitska metoda [3] [4] [5]
Maximum acceptable method detection limit (ng/l)
Najvišja meja zaznavnosti metode (ng/l)
Large-volume SPE — LC-MS-MS
SPE z velikim volumnom – LC-MS-MS
eta-estradiol (E2), Estrone (E1)
eta-estradiol (E2), estron (E1)
Diclofenac
2,6-ditert-butil-4-metilfenol
2,6-Ditert-butyl-4-methylphenol
tilheksil 4-metoksicinamat
thylhexyl 4-methoxycinnamate
ali GC-MS
or GC-MS
makrolidni antibiotiki [6]
Macrolide antibiotics [6]
metiokarb
Methiocarb
neonikotinoidi [7]
Neonicotinoids [7]
oksadiazon
Oxadiazon
trialat
Tri-allate
ali LC-MS-MS
or LC-MS-MS
Številka Evropske unije – ni na voljo za vse snovi.
European Union number — not available for all substances.
Za zagotovitev primerljivosti rezultatov iz različnih držav članic se vse snovi spremljajo v celotnem vzorcu vode.
To ensure comparability of results from different Member States, all substances shall be monitored in whole water samples.
Metode ekstrakcije:LLE ekstrakcija tekoče – tekoče;SPE ekstrakcija na trdni fazi.Analitske metode:GC-MS plinska kromatografija – masna spektroskopija;LC-MS-MS tekočinska kromatografija – (tandemska) trojna kvadrupolna masna spektrometrija.
Extraction methods:LLE liquid liquid extraction,SPE solid-phase extraction.Analytical methods:GC-MS Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,LC-MS-MS Liquid chromatography (tandem) triple quadrupole mass spectrometry.
Za spremljanje 2-etilheksil 4-metoksicinamata v lebdečih delcih (SPM) ali usedlini (velikost < 63 μm) je določena naslednja analitska metoda: SLE (ekstrakcija trdno – tekoče) – GC-MS z najvišjo mejo zaznavnosti 0,2 mg/kg.
For monitoring 2-Ethylhexyl 4-methoxycinnamate in suspended particulate matter (SPM) or in sediment (size < 63 μm), the following analytical method is indicated: SLE (solid liquid extraction) — GC-MS, with a maximum detection limit of 0,2 mg/kg.
Eritromicin (št.
Erythromycin (CAS number 114-07-8, EU number 204-040-1), Clarithromycin (CAS number 81103-11-9), Azithromycin (CAS number 83905-01-5, EU number 617-500-5).
CAS 114-07-8, št.
Imidacloprid (CAS number 105827-78-9/138261-41-3, EU number 428-040-8), Thiacloprid (CAS number 111988-49-9), Thiamethoxam (CAS number 153719-23-4, EU number 428-650-4), Clothianidin (CAS number 210880-92-5, EU number 433-460-1), Acetamiprid (CAS number 135410-20-7/160430-64-8).
EU 204-040-1), klaritromicin (št.
SPE — LC-MS-MS
CAS 81103-11-9), azitromicin (št.
SPE — GC-MS
CAS 83905-01-5, št.
LLE/SPE — GC-MS
EU 617-500-5).
Chemical Abstracts Service.
Imidakloprid (št.
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/506
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/506
on the measures taken by Germany with regard to Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH and various airlines — SA.15376 (C 27/07, ex NN 29/07)
o ukrepih, ki jih je Nemčija izvedla v zvezi z družbo Flughafen Berlin-Schönefeld GmbH in različnimi letalskimi prevozniki – SA.15376 (C 27/07) (ex NN 29/07)
(notified under document C(2014) 868)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 868)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [2] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenima določbama [2], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
Between 2003 and 2006, the Commission received complaints from various parties according to which certain airlines and the manager of Berlin Schönefeld airport (‘Schönefeld’) may have received unlawful State aid with respect to their operations at that airport.
Komisija je med letoma 2003 in 2006 prejela pritožbe različnih strani, ki so trdile, da so nekateri letalski prevozniki in upravljavec letališča Berlin Schönefeld (v nadaljnjem besedilu: letališče Schönefeld) morda prejeli nezakonito državno pomoč za svoje dejavnosti na navedenem letališču.
In a letter dated 17 August 2006, the Commission invited the Federal Republic of Germany (‘Germany’) to provide information on this matter.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 17. avgusta 2006 Nemčijo pozvala, naj posreduje zadevne informacije.
Germany complied with this request for information by letter dated 20 December 2006.
Nemčija je tej zahtevi ugodila z dopisom z dne 20. decembra 2006.
By letter dated 10 July 2007 (‘the opening decision’), the Commission informed Germany that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’) with respect to the aforementioned measures.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 10. julija 2007 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka) Nemčiji sporočila, da bo glede navedenih ukrepov začela postopek v skladu s členom 108(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU).
At the same time, the Commission issued an information injunction under Article 10(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 [3] (with respect to all documents, data and information necessary for the Commission to be able to assess whether the measures in question constituted State aid.
Komisija je hkrati sprejela odredbo o predložitvi podatkov na podlagi člena 10(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 [3] za vse dokumente, podatke in informacije, ki jih potrebuje za oceno, ali zadevni ukrepi pomenijo državno pomoč.
Germany sent its observations to the Commission on 4 October 2007 and supplemented it with further documents on 3 March 2008.
Nemčija je svoja stališča Komisiji predložila 4. oktobra 2007 in jih 3. marca 2008 dopolnila z dodatnimi dokumenti.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 30 October 2007 [4].
Sklep Komisije o začetku postopka je bil v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavljen 30. oktobra 2007 [4].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures in question within one month of the publication date.
Komisija je zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj svoje pripombe glede zadevnih ukrepov predložijo v enem mesecu od datuma objave.
The Commission received comments from several interested parties.
Komisija je prejela pripombe več zainteresiranih strani.
On 16 January 2008 and 20 February 2008, the Commission passed these comments on to Germany.
Komisija je 16. januarja in 20. februarja 2008 te pripombe posredovala Nemčiji.
By letter dated 15 May 2008, Germany sent its observations on the comments of the interested parties.
Nemčija je z dopisom z dne 15. maja 2008 predložila svoja stališča o pripombah zainteresiranih strani.
The Commission then requested further information on 31 August 2009.
Komisija je nato 31. avgusta 2009 zahtevala dodatne informacije.
Germany complied with this request in three stages, on 28 September 2009, 12 October 2009 and 28 October 2009.
Nemčija je tej zahtevi ugodila v treh fazah, in sicer 28. septembra, 12. oktobra in 28. oktobra 2009.
On 4 April 2011, the Commission once again asked Germany for information.
Komisija je 4. aprila 2011 Nemčijo ponovno zaprosila za informacije.
In response to this request, Germany sent new observations and further documents on 19 May 2011.
Nemčija je v odgovor 19. maja 2011 predložila nova stališča in dodatne dokumente.
On 10 October 2011, the Commission forwarded further submissions received from interested parties to Germany.
Komisija je 10. oktobra 2011 Nemčiji posredovala dodatna stališča, ki jih je prejela od zainteresiranih strani.
Following a further request for information by the Commission on 17 January 2012, Germany replied on 14 February 2012.
Po združitvi Nemčije leta 1990 se je Berlin zaradi dolgoletne delitve na vzhodni in zahodni del glede zračnega prometa znašel v prav posebnem položaju.
GENERAL CONTEXT
Letališči v središču mesta, tj. Berlin Tegel (v nadaljnjem besedilu: letališče Tegel) in Berlin Tempelhof (v nadaljnjem besedilu: letališče Tempelhof), sta v nekdanjem Zahodnem Berlinu.
After the reunification of Germany in 1990, Berlin found itself in a very specific situation with respect to air traffic, as a consequence of having been divided into an eastern part and a western part for decades.
Letališče Schönefeld je v nekdanjem Vzhodnem Berlinu na meji med deželama (Länder) Berlin in Brandenburg.
The inner-city airports of Berlin Tegel Airport (‘Tegel’) and Berlin Tempelhof Airport (‘Tempelhof’) are located in what was West Berlin.
Letališče Tempelhof se je odprlo leta 1923, zaradi kratke pristajalne steze pa so ga lahko uporabljali le majhni zrakoplovi.
The airport of Schönefeld is located in what was East Berlin on the border between the city of Berlin and the region of Brandenburg (Land Brandenburg).
Tega letališča ni bilo mogoče zlahka posodobiti, saj je na spomeniško zaščitenem zgodovinskem območju, njegova razširitev pa zaradi stanovanjskih območij, ki ga obdajajo, ni bila mogoča.
Tempelhof was opened in 1923 and could only be used by small aircraft owing to its short runway.
Letališče Tempelhof je prenehalo delovati 30. oktobra 2008.
This airport could not be modernised easily because it is located on a listed historical site and surrounding residential areas made any expansion impossible.
Letališče Tegel, ki je bilo zgrajeno zaradi preskrbe Berlina prek zračnega prevoza med sovjetsko blokado, se je odprlo leta 1948.
Tempelhof airport ceased operating on 30 October 2008.
Od leta 1968 so številni letalski prevozniki svoje dejavnosti z letališča Tempelhof preselili na letališče Tegel, saj letališče Tempelhof ni bilo primerno za reaktivne zrakoplove.
Tegel was opened in 1948 to allow for airlift supplies into Berlin during the Cold War blockade.
Letališče Tegel je bilo od leta 1975 glavno berlinsko potniško letališče.
From 1968, many airlines moved their operations from Tempelhof to Tegel, as the Tempelhof site was not suitable for jet aircraft.
V začetku 90. let prejšnjega stoletja je v prometnih konicah doseglo največjo zmogljivost.
Since 1975, Tegel has become Berlin’s main passenger airport.
Znatnim omejitvam zmogljivosti se je bilo mogoče dolgoročno izogniti le s podaljšanjem vzletno-pristajalne steze in izgradnjo večjega terminala.
In the early 1990s, Tegel began to reach maximum capacity at peak times.
To pa ni bilo mogoče, saj je letališče Tegel, podobno kot letališče Tempelhof, v središču mesta, obdajajo pa ga stanovanjska območja in dovozne ceste.
The only way to avoid significant capacity constraints in the long term was an extension of the runway and the construction of a larger terminal.
Vsako povečanje zračnega prometa na letališču Tegel bi pomenilo tudi večjo obremenitev s hrupom za lokalne prebivalce.
However, this was not possible because this airport, like Tempelhof, is an inner-city airport surrounded by residential areas and access roads.
Letališče Schönefeld se je odprlo leta 1946 po ukazu sovjetske vojaške uprave v Nemčiji.
Moreover, any increase in air traffic at Tegel would translate into increased noise pollution for local residents.
Prvotno je bilo vojaško letališče, ki so ga uporabljali tudi komercialni letalski prevozniki, kot je Aeroflot in pozneje tudi vzhodnonemški zračni prevoznik Interflug.
Schönefeld was opened in 1946 on the orders of the Soviet military administration in Germany.
Do spremembe političnih razmer v Nemčiji leta 1990 je bilo večkrat razširjeno.
It initially served as a primarily military airport which was also used by commercial airlines, such as Aeroflot and, later, the East German airline Interflug.
Zasnovano je bilo kot vojaško letališče, zato ni ustrezalo potrebam sodobnega komercialnega zračnega prometa.
Until the change in Germany’s political situation in 1990, Schönefeld airport was extended several times.
Letališče po spremembi političnih razmer tudi ni bilo več v dobrem stanju.
Designed as a military airport, Schönefeld was not suited to the needs of modern commercial air traffic.
Posodobiti ga je bilo treba v skladu z zahodnoevropskimi varnostnimi standardi, zato so bile v 90. letih prejšnjega stoletja potrebne znatne naložbe.