natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
By way of derogation from the general prohibition against carrying out suspicious transactions, obliged entities should be able to carry out suspicious transactions before informing the competent authorities where refraining from such carrying out is impossible or likely to frustrate efforts to pursue the beneficiaries of a suspected money laundering or terrorist financing operation.
Z odstopanjem od splošne prepovedi izvedbe sumljivih transakcij, bi moralo biti pooblaščenim subjektom omogočeno, da izvedejo sumljive transakcije, preden o tem obvestijo pristojne organe, kadar je takšna izvedba nemogoča ali bi utegnila preprečiti prizadevanja za pregon upravičencev sumljive transakcije pranja denarja ali financiranja terorizma.
This, however, should be without prejudice to the international obligations accepted by the Member States to freeze without delay funds or other assets of terrorists, terrorist organisations or those who finance terrorism, in accordance with the relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions.
Vendar to ne bi smelo vplivati na mednarodne obveznosti, ki so jih prevzele države članice za čimprejšnjo zamrznitev finančnih ali drugih sredstev teroristov, terorističnih organizacij ali tistih, ki financirajo terorizem, v skladu z zadevnimi resolucijami Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov.
For certain obliged entities, Member States should have the possibility to designate an appropriate self-regulatory body as the authority to be informed in the first instance instead of the FIU.
Za določene pooblaščene subjekte bi države članice morale imeti možnost, da določijo ustrezen samoregulativni organ kot organ, ki se ga na prvi stopnji obvesti namesto FIU.
In accordance with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, a system of first instance reporting to a self-regulatory body constitutes an important safeguard for upholding the protection of fundamental rights as concerns the reporting obligations applicable to lawyers.
Sistem, v katerem se najprej poroča samoregulativnemu organu, v skladu s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice predstavlja pomemben zaščitni ukrep za zagotavljanje varstva temeljnih pravic, kar zadeva obveznosti poročanja, ki veljajo za odvetnike.
Member States should provide for the means and manner by which to achieve the protection of professional secrecy, confidentiality and privacy.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti sredstva in načine za zagotavljanje varstva poslovne skrivnosti, zaupnosti in zasebnosti.
Where a Member State decides to designate such a self-regulatory body, it may allow or require that body not to transmit to the FIU any information obtained from persons represented by that body where such information has been received from, or obtained on, one of their clients, in the course of ascertaining the legal position of their client, or in performing their task of defending or representing that client in, or concerning, judicial proceedings, including providing advice on instituting or avoiding such proceedings, whether such information is received or obtained before, during or after such proceedings.
Kadar se država članica odloči določiti takšen samoregulativni organ, lahko temu organu dovoli ali od njega zahteva, da FIU ne posreduje nobenih informacij, ki jih je pridobil od oseb, ki jih zastopa, kadar so bile takšne informacije pridobljene od ali v zvezi z eno od njihovih strank, med ugotavljanjem pravnega položaja njihove stranke ali med opravljanjem nalog obrambe ali zastopanja te stranke v sodnem postopku ali v zvezi z njim, vključno s svetovanjem o sprožitvi postopka ali izogibanju postopku, če takšne informacije pridobijo pred ali med takšnim postopkom ali po njem.
There have been a number of cases where employees who have reported their suspicions of money laundering have been subjected to threats or hostile action.
Obstajajo številni primeri, v katerih so bili zaposleni, ki so poročali o sumih pranja denarja, izpostavljeni grožnjam ali drugim sovražnim dejanjem.
Although this Directive cannot interfere with Member States' judicial procedures, it is crucial that this issue be addressed to ensure effectiveness of the AML/CFT system.
Čeprav ta direktiva ne more posegati v sodne postopke držav članic, je za učinkovitost sistema AML/CFT ključno, da se naslovi to vprašanje.
Member States should be aware of this problem and should do whatever they can to protect individuals, including employees and representatives of the obliged entity, from such threats or hostile action, and to provide, in accordance with national law, appropriate protection to such persons, particularly with regard to their right to the protection of their personal data and their rights to effective judicial protection and representation.
Države članice bi se morale zavedati te težave in storiti vse, kar je v njihovi moči, da posameznike, vključno z zaposlenimi in predstavniki pooblaščenega subjekta, zaščitijo pred takšnimi grožnjami ali sovražnimi dejanji ter da v skladu z nacionalnim pravom zagotovijo ustrezno zaščito takih oseb, zlasti kar zadeva njihovo pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov ter njihovo pravico do učinkovitega sodnega varstva in do zastopanja.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [12], as transposed into national law, applies to the processing of personal data for the purposes of this Directive.
Za obdelavo osebnih podatkov za namene te direktive se uporablja Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES [12], kot je prenesena v nacionalno pravo.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [13] applies to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions and bodies for the purposes of this Directive.
Za obdelavo osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Unije za namene te direktive se uporablja Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13].
The fight against money laundering and terrorist financing is recognised as an important public interest ground by all Member States.
Boj proti pranju denarja in financiranju terorizma vse države članice priznavajo kot pomemben javni interes.
This Directive is without prejudice to the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, including Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA [14], as implemented in national law.
Ta direktiva ne posega v varstvo osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, vključno z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2008/977/PNZ [14], kot je prenesen v nacionalno pravo.
It is essential that the alignment of this Directive with the revised FATF Recommendations is carried out in full compliance with Union law, in particular as regards Union data protection law and the protection of fundamental rights as enshrined in the Charter.
Bistveno je, da se uskladitev te direktive z revidiranimi priporočili FATF izvede ob doslednem upoštevanju prava Unije, zlasti kar zadeva pravo Unije o varstvu podatkov in zaščito temeljnih pravic, kot so določene v Listini.
Certain aspects of the implementation of this Directive involve the collection, analysis, storage and sharing of data.
Nekateri vidiki izvajanja te direktive vključujejo zbiranje, analizo, shranjevanje in izmenjavo podatkov.
Such processing of personal data should be permitted, while fully respecting fundamental rights, only for the purposes laid down in this Directive, and for the activities required under this Directive such as carrying out customer due diligence, ongoing monitoring, investigation and reporting of unusual and suspicious transactions, identification of the beneficial owner of a legal person or legal arrangement, identification of a politically exposed person, sharing of information by competent authorities and sharing of information by credit institutions and financial institutions and other obliged entities.
Takšna obdelava osebnih podatkov bi morala ob doslednem spoštovanju temeljnih pravic biti dovoljena zgolj za namene iz te direktive in za dejavnosti, ki se zahtevajo na podlagi te direktive, kot so izvajanje skrbnega preverjanja strank, stalno spremljanje, preiskovanje in prijavljanje nenavadnih in sumljivih transakcij, identifikacija dejanskega lastnika pravne osebe ali pravne ureditve, identifikacija politično izpostavljene osebe, izmenjava informacij med pristojnimi organi ter izmenjava informacij med kreditnimi institucijami in finančnimi institucijami in drugimi pooblaščenimi subjekti.
The collection and subsequent processing of personal data by obliged entities should be limited to what is necessary for the purpose of complying with the requirements of this Directive and personal data should not be further processed in a way that is incompatible with that purpose.
Zbiranje in nadaljnja obdelava osebnih podatkov, ki ju izvajajo pooblaščeni subjekti, bi morala biti omejena na to, kar je nujno za namen izpolnjevanja zahtev te direktive, osebni podatki pa se ne bi smeli nadalje obdelovati na način, ki ni skladen s tem namenom.
In particular, further processing of personal data for commercial purposes should be strictly prohibited.
Zlasti bi morala biti strogo prepovedana nadaljnja obdelava osebnih podatkov v komercialne namene.
The revised FATF Recommendations demonstrate that, in order to be able to cooperate fully and comply swiftly with information requests from competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, detection or investigation of money laundering and terrorist financing, obliged entities should maintain, for at least five years, the necessary information obtained through customer due diligence measures and the records on transactions.
Revidirana priporočila FATF prikazujejo, da bi morali pooblaščeni subjekti, da bi lahko v celoti sodelovali in hitro izpolnjevali zahteve pristojnih organov po informacijah za namene preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja pranja denarja in financiranja terorizma, najmanj pet let hraniti potrebne informacije, pridobljene z ukrepi skrbnega preverjanja strank, in evidence o transakcijah.
In order to avoid different approaches and in order to fulfil the requirements relating to the protection of personal data and legal certainty, that retention period should be fixed at five years after the end of a business relationship or of an occasional transaction.
Da bi se izognili različnim pristopom in izpolnili zahteve v zvezi z varstvom osebnih podatkov in pravne varnosti, bi bilo treba to obdobje hrambe določiti na pet let po zaključku poslovnega odnosa ali izvedbi občasne transakcije.
However, if necessary for the purposes of prevention, detection or investigation of money laundering and terrorist financing, and after carrying out an assessment of the necessity and proportionality, Member States should be able to allow or require the further retention of records for a period not exceeding an additional five years, without prejudice to the national criminal law on evidence applicable to ongoing criminal investigations and legal proceedings.
Državam članicam pa bi bilo treba, če je to potrebno za namene preprečevanja, odkrivanja ali preiskovanja pranja denarja in financiranja terorizma in po izvedbi ocene njene nujnosti in sorazmernosti, omogočiti, da dovolijo ali zahtevajo nadaljnjo hrambo evidenc za obdobje, ki ne presega dodatnih petih let, in sicer brez poseganja v nacionalno kazensko pravo o dokazih, ki se uporablja za tekoče kazenske preiskave in sodne postopke.
Member States should require that specific safeguards be put in place to ensure the security of data and should determine which persons, categories of persons or authorities should have exclusive access to the data retained.
Države članice bi morale zahtevati, da se s posebnimi zaščitnimi ukrepi zagotovi varnost podatkov, in določiti, katere osebe, kategorije oseb ali organi bi morali imeli izključen dostop do hranjenih podatkov.
For the purpose of ensuring the appropriate and efficient administration of justice during the period for transposition of this Directive into the Member States' national legal orders, and in order to allow for its smooth interaction with national procedural law, information and documents pertinent to ongoing legal proceedings for the purpose of the prevention, detection or investigation of possible money laundering or terrorist financing, which have been pending in the Member States on the date of entry into force of this Directive, should be retained for a period of five years after that date, and it should be possible to extend that period for a further five years.
Za zagotavljanje ustreznega in učinkovitega delovanja pravosodnega sistema med obdobjem za prenos te direktive v nacionalne pravne ureditve držav članic in da se omogoči nemotena interakcija z nacionalnim procesnim pravom, bi bilo treba informacije in dokumente v zvezi s tekočimi pravnimi postopki za namene preprečevanja, odkrivanja ali preiskovanja morebitnega pranja denarja ali financiranja terorizma, ki v državah članicah na datum začetka veljavnosti te direktive še niso končani, hraniti za obdobje petih let po tem datumu in bi moralo biti mogoče to obdobje podaljšati za nadaljnjih pet let.
The rights of access to data by the data subject are applicable to the personal data processed for the purpose of this Directive.
Pravice dostopa do podatkov s strani posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, se uporabljajo za osebne podatke, ki se obdelujejo za namen te direktive.
However, access by the data subject to any information related to a suspicious transaction report would seriously undermine the effectiveness of the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing.
Vendar bi dostop posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, do kakršne koli informacije v zvezi s poročilom o sumljivih transakcijah resno spodkopal učinkovitost boja proti pranju denarja in financiranju terorizma.
Exceptions to and restrictions of that right in accordance with Article 13 of Directive 95/46/EC and, where relevant, Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, may therefore be justified.
Izjeme in omejitve te pravice v skladu s členom 13 Direktive 95/46/ES in, kadar je to ustrezno, členom 20 Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 so zato lahko upravičene.
The data subject has the right to request that a supervisory authority referred to in Article 28 of Directive 95/46/EC or, where applicable, the European Data Protection Supervisor, check the lawfulness of the processing and has the right to seek a judicial remedy referred to in Article 22 of that Directive.
Posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, ima pravico zahtevati, da nadzorni organ iz člena 28 Direktive 95/46/ES ali, če je to ustrezno, Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov preveri zakonitost obdelave in ima pravico do uporabe pravnega sredstva iz člena 22 navedene direktive.
The supervisory authority referred to in Article 28 of Directive 95/46/EC may also act on an ex-officio basis.
Nadzorni organ iz člena 28 Direktive 95/46/ES lahko deluje tudi po uradni dolžnosti.
Without prejudice to the restrictions to the right to access, the supervisory authority should be able to inform the data subject that all necessary verifications by the supervisory authority have taken place, and of the result as regards the lawfulness of the processing in question.
Brez poseganja v omejitve pravice do dostopa bi moral nadzorni organ imeti možnost obvestiti posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, o tem, da je nadzorni organ opravil vsa potrebna preverjanja, ter o rezultatih v zvezi z zakonitostjo zadevne obdelave.
Persons that merely convert paper documents into electronic data and are acting under a contract with a credit institution or a financial institution and persons that provide credit institutions or financial institutions solely with messaging or other support systems for transmitting funds or with clearing and settlement systems do not fall within the scope of this Directive.
Osebe, ki zgolj spreminjajo dokumente v papirni obliki v elektronske podatke in delujejo v okviru pogodbe s kreditno institucijo ali finančno institucijo, ter osebe, ki kreditnim institucijam ali finančnim institucijam zagotavljajo le sisteme sporočil, druge podporne sisteme za posredovanje sredstev ali klirinške sisteme in sisteme poravnave, ne spadajo v področje uporabe te direktive.
Money laundering and terrorist financing are international problems and the effort to combat them should be global.
Pranje denarja in financiranje terorizma sta mednarodni težavi, zato bi moral biti pristop k boju proti njima globalen.
Where Union credit institutions and financial institutions have branches and subsidiaries located in third countries in which the requirements in that area are less strict than those of the Member State, they should, in order to avoid the application of very different standards within the institution or group of institutions, apply to those branches and subsidiaries Union standards or notify the competent authorities of the home Member State if the application of such standards is not possible.
Da bi se izognili uporabi zelo različnih standardov znotraj institucije ali skupine institucij, bi morale kreditne institucije in finančne institucije Unije, ki imajo podružnice in hčerinske družbe v tretjih državah, v katerih so zahteve na tem področju manj stroge kot zahteve države članice, za navedene podružnice in hčerinske družbe uporabljati standarde Unije ali, če uporaba takšnih standardov ni mogoča, uradno obvestiti pristojne organe matične države članice.
Feedback on the usefulness and follow-up of the suspicious transactions reports they present should, where practicable, be made available to obliged entities.
Kadar je to izvedljivo, bi bilo treba pooblaščenim subjektom dati na voljo povratne informacije o koristnosti njihovih poročil o sumljivih transakcijah in nadaljnjem ukrepanju.
To make this possible, and to be able to review the effectiveness of their systems for combating money laundering and terrorist financing, Member States should maintain, and improve the quality of, relevant statistics.
Da bi lahko države članice to omogočile ter presojale učinkovitost svojih sistemov za boj proti pranju denarja in financiranju terorizma, bi morale ohranjati in izboljšati kvaliteto ustreznih statističnih podatkov.
To further enhance the quality and consistency of the statistical data collected at Union level, the Commission should keep track of the Union-wide situation with respect to the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing and should publish regular overviews.
Za nadaljnje izboljšanje kakovosti in usklajenosti statističnih podatkov, zbranih na ravni Unije, bi morala Komisija po vsej Uniji slediti stanju na področju boja proti pranju denarja in financiranju terorizma ter objavljati redne preglede.
Where Member States require issuers of electronic money and payment service providers which are established in their territory in forms other than a branch and the head office of which is situated in another Member State, to appoint a central contact point in their territory, they should be able to require that such a central contact point, acting on behalf of the appointing institution, ensure the establishments' compliance with AML/CFT rules.
Kadar države članice od izdajateljev elektronskega denarja in ponudnikov plačilnih storitev, ki so vzpostavljeni na njihovem ozemlju v obliki, ki ni podružnica, in katerih sedež je v drugi državi članici, zahtevajo, da na njihovem ozemlju imenujejo osrednjo kontaktno točko, bi jim moralo biti omogočeno, da zahtevajo, da takšna osrednja kontaktna točka, ki deluje v imenu institucije, ki jo imenuje, zagotavlja skladnost podjetja s pravili AML/CFT.
They should also ensure that that requirement is proportionate and does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the aim of compliance with AML/CFT rules, including by facilitating the respective supervision.
Prav tako bi morale zagotoviti, da je ta zahteva sorazmerna in ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za dosego cilja skladnosti s pravili AML/CFT, tudi s pomočjo pri ustreznem nadzoru.
Competent authorities should ensure that, with regard to currency exchange offices, cheque cashing offices, trust or company service providers or gambling service providers, the persons who effectively direct the business of such entities and the beneficial owners of such entities are fit and proper.
Pristojni organi bi morali zagotoviti, da so v primeru menjalnic, družb, ki unovčujejo čeke, družb, ki nudijo fiduciarne ali podjetniške storitve, ali izvajalec storitev iger na srečo osebe, ki dejansko vodijo posle takšnih subjektov, in dejanski lastniki takšnih subjektov sposobne in primerne.
The criteria for determining whether or not a person is fit and proper should, as a minimum, reflect the need to protect such entities from being misused by their managers or beneficial owners for criminal purposes.
Merila za ugotavljanje, ali je oseba sposobna in primerna ali ne, bi morala odražati vsaj nujnost zaščite takšnih subjektov pred zlorabo s strani vodstva ali dejanskih lastnikov za namene kaznivih dejanj.
Where an obliged entity operates establishments in another Member State, including through a network of agents, the competent authority of the home Member State should be responsible for supervising the obliged entity's application of group-wide AML/CFT policies and procedures.
Kadar pooblaščeni subjekt upravlja podjetja v drugi državi članici, tudi prek mreže zastopnikov, bi moral biti pristojni organ matične države članice odgovoren za nadzor uporabe politik in postopkov AML/CFT v skupini s strani pooblaščenega subjekta.
This could involve on-site visits in establishments based in another Member State.
To bi lahko vključevalo obiske na kraju samem v podjetjih, ki imajo sedež v drugi državi članici.
The competent authority of the home Member State should cooperate closely with the competent authority of the host Member State and should inform the latter of any issues that could affect their assessment of the establishment's compliance with the host AML/CFT rules.
Pristojni organ matične države članice bi moral tesno sodelovati s pristojnim organom države članice gostiteljice in bi ga moral obveščati o vseh vprašanjih, ki bi lahko vplivala na njegovo oceno skladnosti podjetja s pravili AML/CFT v gostiteljici.
Where an obliged entity operates establishments in another Member State, including through a network of agents or persons distributing electronic money in accordance with Article 3(4) of Directive 2009/110/EC, the competent authority of the host Member State retains responsibility for enforcing the establishment's compliance with AML/CFT rules, including, where appropriate, by carrying out onsite inspections and offsite monitoring and by taking appropriate and proportionate measures to address serious infringements of those requirements.
Kadar pooblaščeni subjekt upravlja podjetja v drugi državi članici, tudi prek mreže zastopnikov ali oseb, ki distribuirajo elektronski denar v skladu s členom 3(4) Direktive 2009/110/ES, pristojni organ države članice gostiteljice obdrži odgovornost za uveljavljanje skladnosti podjetja s pravili AML/CFT, tudi, kadar je primerno, z izvajanjem preverjanj na kraju samem in spremljanjem od daleč ter s sprejemanjem ustreznih in sorazmernih ukrepov za obravnavo hudih kršitev navedenih zahtev.
The competent authority of the host Member State should cooperate closely with the competent authority of the home Member State and should inform the latter of any issues that could affect its assessment of the obliged entity's application of group AML/CFT policies and procedures.
Pristojni organ države članice gostiteljice bi moral tesno sodelovati s pristojnim organom matične države članice in bi ga moral obveščati o vseh vprašanjih, ki bi lahko vplivala na njegovo oceno uporabe politik in postopkov AML/CFT v skupini s strani pooblaščenega subjekta.