natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The sixth company is related to a company in Sri Lanka subject to the measures extended under Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 and to the cooperating company in Pakistan mentioned in recital 22.
Ta edina pakistanska družba je predložila zahtevek za izvzetje v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe, njen uvoz pa je po podatkih Comext v obdobju poročanja znašal nekaj več kot 100 % celotnega uvoza iz Pakistana v Unijo.
It did not cooperate with the investigation.
Družba se je štela za sodelujočo.
Pakistan
V dogovoru z družbo je preveritveni obisk potekal v Šrilanki, na sedežu njenega povezanega dobavitelja delov.
During the reporting period one company produced bicycles in Pakistan.
Filipini
That sole Pakistani company submitted a request for exemption in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation and covered slightly more than 100 % of the total imports from Pakistan to the Union as reported in Comext.
V obdobju poročanja sta na Filipinih kolesa proizvajali dve družbi.
The company was considered to be cooperating.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 39 in 40, je bilo ugotovljeno, da ena od družb na trg Unije uvaža prek dveh nepovezanih trgovcev.
In agreement with the company, the verification visit took place in Sri Lanka, at the seat of its related supplier of parts.
Za eno od trgovskih družb je bilo ugotovljeno tudi, da je izvajala podobne operacije z drugo družbo v Šrilanki med prejšnjo preiskavo proti izogibanju.
The Philippines
Uvoz dveh filipinskih družb, ki sta predložili zahtevek za izvzetje v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe, je v obdobju poročanja po podatkih Comext znašal malo nad 100 % vsega uvoza s Filipinov v Unijo.
During the reporting period there were two companies producing bicycles in the Philippines.
Le ena od navedenih družb se je štela za sodelujočo v celoti.
As explained in recitals 39 and 40, one of these companies was found to export to the Union market via two unrelated traders.
Sodelovanje druge družbe je bilo po ugotovitvah nezadovoljivo iz naslednjih razlogov:
One of the trading companies was also found to carry out similar operations with another company located in Sri Lanka during the previous anti-circumvention investigation.
Družba v določenem roku ni predložila informacij, zahtevanih v obrazcu zahtevka za izvzetje; zlasti ni predložila natančne razčlenitve vrste delov za kolesa, ki jih je kupila na Kitajskem.
The two Filipino companies that submitted a request for exemption in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation covered slightly more than 100 % of the total imports from the Philippines to the Union as reported in Comext.
Njena povezana družba na Kitajskem ni predložila izpolnjenega vprašalnika za izvoznike.
Only one of these companies was considered fully cooperating.
Družba je močno ovirala preiskavo, saj ni predložila zadevnih delovnih listov in druge podporne dokumentacije, ki je med preveritvijo na kraju samem potrebna za preverjanje informacij, predloženih v obrazcu zahtevka za izvzetje, ali pa so bili ti dokumenti predloženi z veliko zamudo.
The cooperation of the second company was found to be insufficient for the following reasons.
Predložila je napačne ali zavajajoče informacije: prvič, količina in kakovost lakiranja in kemične obdelave okvirjev, ugotovljeni na različnih stopnjah preveritvenega obiska, se nista ujemali s količino dokončanih koles, ki so bila domnevno proizvedena v obdobju poročanja.
The company did not provide the information required in the exemption form within the time limits set; in particular it did not provide a detailed breakdown of the type of bicycle parts it purchased from China.
Drugič, odsotnost surovin za proizvodnjo okvirjev, ki so bili na voljo za pregled med preveritvenim obiskom, postavlja pod vprašanje trditev družbe, da proizvaja okvirje.
Its related company in China did not submit any reply to the exporters' questionnaire.
Tretjič, v odgovoru na poziv k dopolnitvi dne 13. oktobra 2014 je družba predložila informacije v obliki faktur v številnih Excelovih datotekah, ki se niso ujemale s predhodnimi informacijami o nakupni ceni delov.
It has significantly impeded the investigation as it did not provide the relevant working sheets and other supporting documents necessary for the verification of the information provided in the exemption form during the on-spot verification; or such documents were only provided with significant time delays.
Četrtič, med preveritvenim obiskom je samo v papirnati obliki predložila drug komplet dokumentov za nakupe delov, ki je vseboval nove informacije o domnevnem dobavitelju delov.
It has supplied false or misleading information: First, the volume and the quality of the painting and of the chemical treatment of the frames identified at various stages of the verification visit was not compatible with the quantity of finished bicycles allegedly produced in the reporting period.
Petič, preiskava je pokazala, da izvozne fakture in ujemajoča se potrdila o poreklu niso omenjala iste družbe, kar meče dvom na vlogo družbe kot dejanskega izvoznika koles in posledično na pravilnost predloženih faktur.
Second, the absence of the raw materials for the production of frames available for inspection during the verification visit puts in question the company's claim of being a producer of frames.
Šestič, informacije o amortizaciji, stroških dela in odhodkih za energijo so bile zelo dvomljive, saj so bile verjetno pretirane.
Third, in reply to the deficiency letter on 13 October 2014 the company provided information in the form of invoices in a large number of excel files that could not be reconciled with the previous information submitted concerning the purchase price of parts.
Zato je bila v skladu s členom 18(4) osnovne uredbe družba 16. januarja 2015 obveščena, da se informacije, ki jih je predložila, deloma ne bodo upoštevale, poleg tega pa ji je bil odobren rok za predložitev pripomb.
Fourth, it submitted during the verification visit a second set of documents only on paper format for the purchases of parts which contained new information on alleged supplier of parts.
V odgovoru z dne 30. januarja 2015 se je družba opredelila o razlogih, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 25, kot je pojasnjeno spodaj.
Fifth, the investigation revealed that the export invoices and the corresponding certificates of origin did not mention the same company which cast doubts on the role of the company as an actual exporter of bicycles and consequently on the correctness of the invoices provided.
V zvezi z razlogom, navedenim v točki (a) uvodne izjave 25, je družba trdila, da obrazec zahtevka za izvzetje od nje ni zahteval natančne razčlenitve kupljenih delov za kolesa, da je bila naloga določanja in razvrščanja vrste kupljenih delov obremenjujoča ter da tako natančne informacije po njenem mnenju ne bi predstavljale dodatnih koristnih informacij za Komisijo pri ugotavljanju, ali so bila izpolnjena merila iz člena 13 osnovne uredbe.
Sixth, the information regarding depreciation, labour costs and energy expenses were highly dubious as they were likely to be overstated.
Istega dne, tj. več kot dva meseca po preveritvi na kraju samem, je družba predložila nov dokument z razčlenitvijo vrste delov, kupljenih v obdobju poročanja.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 18(4) of the basic Regulation, on 16 January 2015 the company was informed of the intention to partially disregard the information submitted by it and was granted a time limit to provide its comments.
Komisija se ne strinja s temi trditvami, saj sta količina in vrednost nakupov potrebni za oceno, ali so izpolnjena merila iz členov 13(1) in (2) osnovne uredbe.
In its reply on 30 January 2015, the company took position on the reasons provided for in recital 25 above, as explained below.
Te informacije so se tudi izrecno zahtevale v obrazcu zahtevka za izvzetje.
With regard to the reason stated in point (a) of recital 25, the company claimed that it was not required by the exemption form to provide a detailed breakdown of the purchased bicycle parts, that the task of identifying and classifying the type of parts bought was burdensome and that such detailed information would not in its view provide any additional valuable information to the Commission for the purpose of determining whether the criteria of Article 13 of the basic Regulation were met.
Vse druge sodelujoče družbe v sedanji preiskavi so lahko zagotovile zadevne informacije v zahtevani obliki.
On the same day, i.e. more than 2 months after the on-spot verification, the company also submitted a new document with the breakdown of the type of parts purchased in the reporting period.
Nove informacije, posredovane z zamudo, se niso v celoti ujemale z informacijami, ki so bile predložene prej.
This information was also explicitly requested in the exemption form.
Poleg tega je družba trdila, da Komisija ni podala zadostnih navodil o tem, ali bi morala njena povezana kitajska družba, ki je vključena v proizvodnjo, prodajo ali trženje koles, izpolniti vprašalnik za izvoznike.
All other cooperating companies in the present investigation were able to provide the relevant information in the requested format.
Družba je tudi trdila, da so bile količine, izvožene v Unijo, de minimis in da zato te informacije po njenem mnenju niso bile relevantne za preiskavo.
As concerns the new information submitted belatedly, this could not be fully reconciled with the information provided before.
Kljub tem trditvam je filipinska družba na koncu predložila izpolnjen vprašalnik za izvoznike, čeprav zelo pozno v preiskavi.
Therefore, given the nature and the quantity of the information provided and the fact that the file was submitted after the on-spot verification and could not be checked anymore, it was disregarded.
Zato so bile zgoraj navedene trditve in predložene informacije zavrnjene.
In addition, the company claimed that the Commission had not provided enough guidance on whether its related Chinese company involved in the manufacture, sale or marketing of bicycles should have filled in the exporter's questionnaire.
V zvezi z razlogom, navedenim v točki (b) uvodne izjave 25, je družba v svoji predložitvi z dne 30. januarja 2015 trdila, da so bila med preveritvijo na kraju samem odkrita odstopanja minimalna, da zamuda pri predložitvi zahtevanih dokumentov ni bila bistvena in da je do nje prišlo zaradi omejenih organizacijskih sredstev družbe.
The company also claimed that the quantities exported to the Union were de minimis and therefore this information was in its view not relevant for the investigation.
Poleg tega je trdila, da je Komisija do konca preveritvenega obiska prejela vse dokumente, ki jih je zahtevala.
Despite these claims, the Filipino company submitted eventually a reply to the exporter's questionnaire, albeit at a very late stage of the investigation.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so bila med preveritvijo na kraju samem odkrita odstopanja povezana predvsem s količino proizvedenih koles, kar je bistvena informacija zaradi pomena za oceno zahtevka za izvzetje.
In respect of the above claims, it should be noted that the exemption claim form clearly requires this information, independently of the quantities exported, which was also highlighted to the company in the deficiency letter of 13 October 2014.
V zvezi z domnevnimi omejenimi sredstvi družbe ta pred preveritvenim obiskom nikoli ni trdila, da ima omejena sredstva, ki bi lahko zavlekla izvajanje preverjanja.
In addition, the late submission of the reply did not allow the Commission to verify the information provided therein and it was thus not possible to assess whether it had a material impact on the situation of the company.
Poleg tega so obstajali številni bistveni zahtevani dokumenti, ki jih družba do konca preveritve ni predložila, kot so dokumenti, predloženi lokalnim organom, na podlagi katerih so organi izdali potrdila o izvoru na drugo ime, ne na ime družbe, in podporna dokumentacija za določanje življenjske dobe stavb družbe za izračun njihovega amortizacijskega obdobja, in ki so pomembno vplivali na stroške.
Therefore, the above claims and the information provided were rejected.
V zvezi s prvim in drugim razlogom, navedenima v točki (c) uvodne izjave 25, je družba trdila, da je bila ocena Komisije, da količina in kakovost lakiranja in kemične obdelave okvirjev, ugotovljeni na različnih stopnjah preveritvenega obiska, nista bili skladni s količino dokončanih koles, domnevno proizvedenih v obdobju poročanja, nejasna.
With regard to the reason stated in point (b) of recital 25, the company claimed in its submission of 30 January 2015 that the discrepancies revealed during the on-spot verification were minor, that the time delay in the production of documents requested was not significant and was due to the company's limited organisational means.
Podobno je izjavila, da so bili dvomi Komisije o zmožnosti družbe za proizvodnjo okvirjev prav tako nejasni.
In addition, it was claimed that by the end of the verification visit the Commission had received all the documents it had requested.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 29, da družba ni predložila potrebnih informacij, kot je bilo zahtevano v obrazcu zahtevka za izvzetje, kar bi Komisiji omogočilo oceno količine kupljenih in proizvedenih okvirjev.
In this regard it should be noted that the discrepancies identified during the on-spot verification concerned mainly the production volume of bicycles, that is a significant information due to its importance for the assessment of the request for exemption.
Med preveritvijo na kraju samem je Komisija obiskala obrat in ugotovila, da se nekatere dejavnosti niso izvajale neprekinjeno, kot to zahteva proizvodni proces.
Concerning the alleged company's limited resources, at no time before the verification visit did the company claim limited resources that could delay the conduct of the verification.
Komisija je na primer po prvem obisku, med katerim je bila proizvodnja videti tekoča, obrat obiskala še enkrat in ugotovila, da je ta dejavnost prenehala, da so bili okvirji zapuščeni na območju kemične obdelave in da je bila v oddelku lakiranja izklopljena elektrika, medtem ko okvirji še niso bili v celoti prelakirani, brez očitne utemeljitve.
Furthermore, there were still a number of requested documents of significant importance that the company did not submit by the end of the verification, such as the documents submitted to the local authorities on the basis of which the authorities issued the certificates of origin on a different name than the company's name, and the supporting documents for the determination of the useful life of the company's buildings for the purpose of calculating its depreciation period and which had a significant impact on costs.
Nasprotno, takšna prekinitev proizvodnje bi lahko bistveno vplivala na kakovost dokončanih okvirjev, kar ni v skladu z gospodarsko smotrnim proizvodnim procesom.
With regard to the first and second reason stated in point (c) of recital 25, the company claimed that the Commission's assessment that the volume and the quality of painting and chemical treatment of frames identified at various stages of the verification visit which was not compatible with the quantity of finished bicycles allegedly produced in the reporting period was unclear.
Drugič, Komisija med preveritvenim obiskom ni mogla preveriti obstoja surovin za proizvodnjo okvirjev v prostorih družbe.
It similarly stated that the Commission's doubts about the company's capacity to produce frames are also unclear.
Ne glede na to je bilo med preveritvenim obiskom ugotovljeno, da je družba dejansko imela nekaj opreme za proizvodnjo okvirjev in ni bilo izključeno, da bi družba v obdobju poročanja lahko proizvedla nekaj okvirjev.
In this regard, it is highlighted that, as stated in recital 29, the company did not provide the necessary information as requested in the exemption form allowing the Commission to assess the volume of purchased frames and of manufactured frames.
Zato je Komisija na podlagi nepopolnih informacij, ki jih je posredovala družba, kot je pojasnjeno v točki (c) uvodne izjave 25 s seštevanjem vseh nakupov okvirjev, ki jih je družba sporočila v Excelovih datotekah, predloženih v odgovor na poziv k dopolnitvi z dne 13. oktobra 2014, sklenila, da je bila kljub prisotnosti opreme večina okvirjev za sestavljanje koles, prodanih na trg Unije v obdobju poročanja, dejansko kupljena na Kitajskem.
During the on-spot verification, the Commission visited the plant and ascertained that certain activities were not carried out continuously as required by the production process.
V zvezi s tretjim razlogom, navedenim v točki (c) uvodne izjave 25, je družba trdila, da je do težav pri usklajevanju vrednosti kupljenih delov prišlo zaradi dejstva, da so bile na fakturi, ki jo je predložila družba, navedene le cene FOB (franko ladja), namesto cen CIF (stroški, zavarovanje in prevoznina).
For example, after a first visit of the Commission where the manufacturing activity appeared to be on-going, the Commission visited the plant again and found out that this activity had ceased, as the frames were abandoned in the chemical treatment area and the electricity was shut down in the painting department while the frames were not completely painted, without any apparent justification.
Družba je predložila tudi nov dokument, ki je navajal cene FOB in CIF.
To the contrary, such discontinuation of the production could have a significant impact on the quality of the finished frames, which is not in line with an economically rational production process.
V zvezi z uskladitvijo nakupnih cen obrazec zahtevka za izvzetje od družbe zahteva, da navede vrednost fakture in dejanske dobavne pogoje za vsako nakupno transakcijo.
Secondly, the Commission was not able to verify the existence of raw materials for the manufacturing of frames at the company's premises during the verification visit.
V izpolnjenem obrazcu zahtevka za izvzetje družba za nobeno od sporočenih transakcij ni navedla, ali so dobavni pogoji FOB ali CIF, ampak ali gre za stroške in prevoznino ali plačilo po povzetju.
Nevertheless, during the verification visit it was found that the company had indeed some equipment to manufacture frames and it was not excluded that the company could have manufactured some frames in the reporting period.
Poleg tega je družba te obtožbe navedla pozno v preiskavi in teh informacij ni bilo več mogoče preveriti, torej je bila glede na njihovo naravo in količino ta trditev zavrnjena.
Therefore, based on the incomplete information submitted by the company as explained in point (c) of recital 25, the Commission concluded, by adding up all the purchases of frames reported by the company in the excel files submitted in reply to the deficiency letter on 13 October 2014, that despite the presence of the equipment, most of the frames used for the assembly of the bicycles sold to the Union market during the reporting period were in fact purchased from China.
V zvezi s četrtim razlogom, navedenim v točki (c) uvodne izjave 25 je bilo navedeno, da posredna prodaja povezane kitajske družbe prek domnevno nepovezanih dobaviteljev predstavlja majhen del skupnih nakupov družbe.
With regard to the third reason stated in point (c) of recital 25, the company claimed that the difficulties in reconciling the value of the purchased parts are due to the fact that the company only submitted the FOB (free on board) prices instead of the CIF (cost, insurance and freight) prices indicated on the invoice.
Komisija iz razlogov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 29, ni mogla ugotoviti natančne količine delov, kupljenih pri povezanem dobavitelju.
The company also submitted a new file indicating FOB and CIF prices.
Zato Komisija še naprej dvomi o zanesljivosti nakupne cene za dele in identiteti glavnega dobavitelja.
Concerning the reconciliation of the purchase prices, the exemption form requires the company to indicate the invoice value and the actual delivery term of each purchase transaction.
V zvezi s petim razlogom, navedenim v točki (c) uvodne izjave 25 glede pravilnosti izvozne cene je bilo navedeno, da družba običajno prodaja kolesa na trg Unije prek dveh nepovezanih trgovskih družb, ki jih prodata naprej končni stranki v Uniji.
In its reply to the exemption form, the company did not indicate for any of the reported transactions that the delivery term was FOB or CIF, but rather C&F (cost and freight) or COD (cash on delivery).
Poleg tega naj bi dejstvo, da se imeni trgovskih družb pojavita na nekaterih potrdilih o poreklu, ki jih je predložila družba, le odražalo status trgovca kot končnega prodajalca strankam v Uniji.
In addition, as these allegations were raised by the company late in the investigation and such information could be no longer verified, also taking into account its nature and quantity, this claim was rejected.
V zvezi s tem družba ni prijavila svojih nepovezanih trgovskih družb kot strank in to nasprotuje trditvi družbe, da sta dejansko končna prodajalca strankam v Uniji.
As regards the fourth reason stated in point (c) of recital 25, it was claimed that the indirect sales of the related Chinese company through the allegedly unrelated suppliers account for a minor part of the total purchases of the company.
To dejansko potrjuje mnenje Komisije, da fakture med družbo in strankami v Uniji, ki so bile predložene med preveritvijo na kraju samem, ne odražajo dejanskih izvoznih transakcij, saj bi morala fakture strankam v Uniji izstavljati nepovezana trgovca.
The Commission was not in the position to establish the exact volume of parts purchased from the related supplier for the reasons set out in recital 29.
Zato je bila sporočena izvozna cena obravnavana kot nezanesljiva in ni bila upoštevana.
Therefore, the Commission maintains its doubts on reliability of the purchase price for parts and the identity of the main supplier.
V zvezi s šestim razlogom, navedenim v točki (c) uvodne izjave 25 glede nezanesljivosti stroškov, povezanih z amortizacijo, stroški dela in električne energije, je družba trdila naslednje.
In relation to the fifth reason stated in point (c) of recital 25 concerning the correctness of the export price, it was claimed that the company usually sells bicycles to the Union market through two unrelated trading companies which then resell them to the final customer in the Union.
Prvič, glede stroškov amortizacije je družba omenila leta izgradnje svojih stavb, vendar teh trditev ni podprla z dokazi.
Furthermore, the fact that the names of the trading companies appear on some certificates of origin submitted by the company would simply reflect the trader's status as the ultimate seller to the Union customers.
Poleg tega je Komisija med preveritvijo na kraju samem večkrat zahtevala dokaz o letu izgradnje stavb in oceno obdobja amortizacije stavb glede na pomen vrednosti amortizacije za izračun preskusa dodane vrednosti v skladu s členom 13(2) osnovne uredbe.
In this regard, the company did not report its unrelated trading companies as customers, and this contradicts the company's claim that they were actually the ultimate sellers to the Union customers.
Družba je življenjsko dobo svojih stavb določila bistveno pod običajno dobo po mednarodnih računovodskih standardih, tj. 50 let.
This in fact confirms the Commission's understanding that the invoices between the company and the Union customers shown during the on-spot verification do not reflect the actual export transactions, as the Union customers should then be invoiced by the unrelated traders.
Zato so bili stroški amortizacije visoki, kar je močno vplivalo na sporočene skupne stroške sestavljenih koles.
Therefore, the reported export price was found not to be reliable and was therefore disregarded.
Družba ni mogla zagotoviti podpornih dokumentov, kot so na primer zadevne analize ali dokumenti o temeljnih razlogih za notranje odločanje družbe, ki bi upravičili takšno odstopanje od običajne prakse.
In relation to the sixth reason stated in point (c) of recital 25 concerning the unreliability of the costs related to depreciation, labour costs and electricity, the company claimed the following.
Med preveritvenim obiskom Komisija ni mogla ugotoviti razloga, zakaj družba ne bi mogla stavb uporabljati dlje od navedenega obdobja.