natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Recovery should cover the time from when the advantage accrued to Arfea, that is to say when the aid was put at its disposal (i.e. on 7 February 2014), until effective recovery, and the sums to be recovered should bear interest until effective recovery,
Italijanska republika obvešča Komisijo o napredku glede sprejetih nacionalnih ukrepov za izvajanje tega sklepa, dokler se pomoč iz člena 1 ne izterja v celoti.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Na zahtevo Komisije takoj predloži informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s tem sklepom.
Article 1
Predloži tudi podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih za vračilo, ki jih je upravičenka že vrnila.
The State aid amounting to EUR 1299594 unlawfully granted by the Italian Republic, in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in favour of Arfea is incompatible with the internal market.
Člen 5
Article 2
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Italijansko republiko.
The Italian Republic shall recover the aid referred to in Article 1 from the beneficiary.
V Bruslju, 10. junija 2016
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from 7 February 2014 until their actual recovery.
Za Komisijo
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [32] and to Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 [33] amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Članica Komisije
The Italian Republic shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 1 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
UL C 219, 3.7.2015, str. 12.
Article 3
Glej sprotno opombo 1.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Istituzione del Fondo nazionale per il ripiano dei disavanzi di esercizio e per gli investimenti nel settore (GU n.
The Italian Republic shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
113 del 24.4.1981), na voljo na: http://www.normattiva.it/urires/ N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:legge:1981-04-10;151.
Article 4
Interventi finanziari della Regione nel settore del trasporto pubblico di persone (B.U. 28 luglio 1982, n.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, the Italian Republic shall submit the following information to the Commission:
30), na voljo na: http://arianna.consiglioregionale.piemonte.it/base/leggi/l1982016.html.
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from the beneficiary;
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 1191/69 z dne 26. junija 1969 o ukrepanju držav članic glede obveznosti javne službe v železniškem in cestnem prometu ter prometu po celinskih plovnih poteh (UL L 156, 28.6.1969, str. 1).
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
Sentenza n.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid.
5043 z dne 28. avgusta 2006.
The Italian Republic shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans proti Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, EU:C:2003:415.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Glej Prilogo I k Uredbi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1370/2007 z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o javnih storitvah železniškega in cestnega potniškega prevoza ter o razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 1191/69 in (EGS) št. 1107/70 (UL L 315, 3.12.2007, str. 1).
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiary.
V skladu s točko 2 Priloge se „[p]osledice ocenijo s primerjavo položaja, ko je obveznost opravljanja javne službe izpolnjena, s položajem, ki bi obstajal, če obveznost ne bi bila izpolnjena.
Article 5
Za izračunanje finančnega neto učinka pristojni organ upošteva naslednji sistem:stroški, nastali zaradi obveznosti opravljanja javne službe ali sklopa teh obveznosti, ki jih naloži pristojni organ/predpišejo pristojni organi in so zajete v pogodbi o izvajanju javne službe in/ali s splošnim pravilom,zmanjšano za kakršen koli pozitivni finančni učinek, nastal v sklopu omrežja, ki se upravlja v okviru zadevne(-ih) obveznosti opravljanja javne službe,zmanjšano za prejemke iz tarif ali kakršen koli prihodek, nastal pri izpolnjevanju zadevne(-ih) obveznosti opravljanja javne službe,s prištetjem primernega dobička,ustreza finančnemu neto učinku“.
This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.
V okvirnem sklepu iz leta 1984 so določene ravni „standardnih stroškov“ za avtobusne in tramvajske storitve v Torinu in drugih občinah regije Piemonte, poleg tega so določene razlike med programi na ravnini ali na gorskem območju.
Done at Brussels, 10 June 2016.
Člen 1 določa, da se standardni stroški določijo na podlagi razumnih in strogih meril upravljanja, ob upoštevanju kakovosti opravljene storitve in geografskih razmer.
For the Commission
V skladu s členom 4 je znesek, ki izhaja iz uporabe standardnih stroškov za kilometre, ki jih opravi izvajalec storitve, pomenil najvišjo dopustno raven javnih prispevkov na leto, razen če so bili dejanski stroški izvajalca storitve nižji od standardnih stroškov.
Member of the Commission
V tem primeru se javni prispevki dodelijo na podlagi dejanskih stroškov izvajalca storitve.
OJ C 219, 3.7.2015, p.
Zadeva C-527/12, Komisija proti Nemčiji, EU:C:2014:2193, točka 56 in navedena sodna praksa.
12.
Glej tudi zadevo C-119/05, Lucchini, EU:C:2007:434, točka 59.
Cf. footnote [1].
Zadeva T-17/02, Fred Olsen, Recueil 2005, str. II-2031, točka 216; Zadeva T-289/03, BUPA in drugi proti Komisiji,Recueil 2008, str. II-81, točke 166–169 in 172.
Istituzione del Fondo nazionale per il ripiano dei disavanzi di esercizio e per gli investimenti nel settore (GU n.
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans proti Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, EU:C:2003:415, točka 91.
113 del 24.4.1981), available at: http://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:legge:1981-04-10;151
Zadeva 157/01, Danske Busvognmænd, 2004, EU:T:2004:76, točke 77, 78 in 79.
Interventi finanziari della Regione nel settore del trasporto pubblico di persone (B.U. 28 luglio 1982, n.
Zadeva T-15/14, Simet SpA proti Komisiji, točka 163.
30), available at: http://arianna.consiglioregionale.piemonte.it/base/leggi/l1982016.html
Zadeva T-15/14, Simet SpA proti Komisiji, točka 159.
Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 of the Council of 26 June 1969 on action by Member States concerning the obligations inherent in the concept of a public service in transport by rail, road and inland waterway (OJ L 156, 28.6.1969, p.
Zadeva 156/77, Komisija proti Belgiji, 1978, EU:C:1978:180, točka 10.
1).
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 1107/70 z dne 4. junija 1970 o dodeljevanju pomoči v železniškem in cestnem prevozu ter prevozu po celinskih plovnih poteh (UL L 130, 15.6.1970, str.
Sentenza n.
1).
5043 of 28 August 2006.
Zadeva C-303/13 P, Komisija proti Andersenu, točka 55.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans v Regierungsprasidium Magdeburg EU:C:2003:415.
Na primer škodno dejanje ali neupravičena obogatitev.
See the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p.
Združene zadeve C-106/87 do C-120/87, Asteris in drugi proti Grčiji in EGS, EU:C:1988:457.
1).
Glej Sklep Komisije z dne 16. junija 2004 o nizozemski pomoči v korist družbe Akzo-Nobel za zmanjšanje obsega prevozov klora (zadeva N 304/2003), povzetek v UL C 81, 2.4.2005, str. 4; glej tudi Sklep Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2006 o nizozemski pomoči za preselitev podjetja za razstavljanje vozil Steenbergen (zadeva N 575/2005), povzetek v UL C 80, 13.4.2007, str. 1.
According to point 2 of the Annex, ‘the effects shall be assessed by comparing the situation where the public service obligation is met with the situation which would have existed if the obligation had not been met.
Zadeva C-119/05, Lucchini, EU:C:2007:434, točka 59.
In order to calculate the net financial effect, the competent authority shall be guided by the following scheme:costs incurred in relation to a public service obligation or a bundle of public service obligations imposed by the competent authority/authorities, contained in a public service contract and/or in a general rule,minus any positive financial effects generated within the network operated under the public service obligation(s) in question,minus receipts from tariff or any other revenue generated while fulfilling the public service obligation(s) in question,plus a reasonable profit,equals net financial effect’.
Glej prav tam, točka 61.
The 1984 Framework Decision established the levels of ‘standard costs’ for buses and tram services for the city of Turin and for other municipalities in Piemonte, and further distinguished between level lines and mountain lines.
Zadeva T-15/14, Simet SpA proti Komisiji, točke 102–103.
Article 1 specifies that standard costs were established on the basis of prudent and rigorous management criteria, taking also into account the quality of the service provided and the geographical conditions.
Sklep z dne 28. aprila 2005 v združenih zadevah C-346/03 in C-529/03, Atzori, EU:C:2005:256, točka 198.
According to Article 4, the amount deriving from the application of the standard costs to the kilometres performed by the service provider represented the maximum admissible level of public contributions per year, unless the actual costs incurred by the service provider were lower than the standard costs.
Zadeva T-15/14, Simet SpA proti Komisiji, točke 102–103.Glej tudi sodno prakso Splošnega sodišča o odškodninskih klavzulah za vračilo državne pomoči:Zadeva T-384/08, Elliniki Nafpigokataskevastiki AE Chartofylakeiou proti Komisiji, EU:T:2011:650, in zadeva T-565/08, Corsica Ferries proti Komisiji, EU:T:2012:415, točke 23, 114 in 120 do 131.
If this was the case, public contributions were to be granted on the basis of the actual costs of the service provider.
Po analogiji glej tudi zadevo C-111/10, Komisija proti Svetu, EU:C:2013:785, točka 44.
Case C-527/12 Commission v Germany EU:C:2014:2193, paragraph 56 and the case-law cited.
Glej zadevo C-70/72, Komisija proti Nemčiji, 1973, str. 813, točka 13.
See also, Case C-119/05 Lucchini EU:C:2007:434, paragraph 59.
Glej združene zadeve C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92, Španija proti Komisiji, 1994, str. I-4103, točka 75.
Case T-17/02 Fred Olsen [2005] ECR II-2031, paragraph 216; Case T-289/03 BUPA and Others v Commission [2008] ECR II-81, paragraphs 166-169 and 172.
Glej zadevo C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji, 1999, str. I-3671, točki 64 in 65.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans v Regierungsprasidium Magdeburg EU:C:2003:415, paragraph 91.
Uredba Sveta (EU) 2015/1589 z dne 13. julija 2015 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 248, 24.9.2015, str. 9).
Case T 157/01 Danske Busvognmænd [2004] EU:T:2004:76, points 77, 78 and 79.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (EU) 2015/1589 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str.
Case T-15/14, Simet SpA v Commission, paragraph 163.
1).
Case T-15/14, Simet SpA v Commission, paragraph 159.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 271/2008 z dne 30. januarja 2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 82, 25.3.2008, str.
Case 156/77 Commission v Belgium [1978] EU:C:1978:180, paragraph 10.
1).
Regulation (EEC) No 1107/70 of the Council of 4 June 1970 on the granting of aids for transport by rail, road and inland waterway (OJ L 130, 15.6.1970, p.
Družba Arfea je tudi leta 1997 regijo zaprosila za dodatne javne prispevke na podlagi člena 12 zakona št. 472/1999 za leto 1997 in jih prejela.
1).
Ker se zdi, da so bili ti javni prispevki družbi Arfea dodeljeni več kot deset let pred tem, ko je Komisija Italiji poslala prvi zahtevek za informacije, ti prispevki ne bodo predmet presoje v zadevnem sklepu.
For example, tort or unjustified enrichment.
Po navedbah družbe Arfea znesek nadomestila, ki ga je prejela, izračunan na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje, ni v celoti pokril njenih primanjkljajev pri opravljanju obveznosti javne službe.
Joined cases 106 to 120/87, Asteris and Others v Greece and EEC EU:C:1988:457.
To zahtevo je regija zavrnila z uradnim sporočilom z dne 14. maja 2007 in 25. januarja 2008.
1.
Regionalno upravno sodišče je določilo ustrezno višino zneskov dodatnega nadomestila, ki ga je morala regija plačati družbi Arfea, in odredilo, da se morata zneska izplačati do 7. februarja 2014.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2085
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/2085
concerning certain interim protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in the Netherlands
o nekaterih začasnih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z visokopatogeno aviarno influenco podtipa H5N8 na Nizozemskem
(notified under document C(2016) 7851)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2016) 7851)
Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market [1], and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 89/662/EGS z dne 11. decembra 1989 o veterinarskih pregledih v trgovini znotraj Skupnosti glede na vzpostavitev notranjega trga [1] in zlasti člena 9(3) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market [2], and in particular Article 10(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 90/425/EGS z dne 26. junija 1990 o veterinarskih in zootehničnih pregledih, ki se zaradi vzpostavitve notranjega trga izvajajo v trgovini znotraj Skupnosti z nekaterimi živimi živalmi in proizvodi [2], in zlasti člena 10(3) Direktive,
The Netherlands notified the Commission of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in a holding on its territory where poultry or other captive birds are kept and it immediately took the measures required pursuant to Directive 2005/94/EC, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones.
Nizozemska je Komisijo obvestila o izbruhu visokopatogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N8 na gospodarstvu na svojem ozemlju, kjer gojijo perutnino ali druge ptice v ujetništvu, ter nemudoma uvedla ukrepe v skladu z Direktivo 2005/94/ES, vključno z vzpostavitvijo okuženih in ogroženih območij.
The Commission has examined those measures in collaboration with the Netherlands, and it is satisfied that the borders of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authority in that Member State, are at a sufficient distance to the actual holding where the outbreak was confirmed.
Komisija je v sodelovanju z Nizozemsko preučila navedene ukrepe in presodila, da so meje okuženih in ogroženih območij, ki jih je vzpostavil pristojni organ v navedeni državi članici, dovolj oddaljene od dejanskega gospodarstva, na katerem je bil izbruh potrjen.
In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe the protection and surveillance zones established in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in the Netherlands at Union level.
Da bi preprečili kakršne koli nepotrebne motnje v trgovini v Uniji in se izognili tveganju, da tretje države sprejmejo neupravičene omejitve trgovanja, je treba na ravni Unije nemudoma opisati okužena in ogrožena območja, vzpostavljena v zvezi z visokopatogeno aviarno influenco na Nizozemskem.
Accordingly, pending the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, the protection and surveillance zones in the Netherlands, where the animal health control measures as laid down in Directive 2005/94/EC are applied, should be defined in the Annex to this Decision and the duration of that regionalisation fixed.
Zato bi bilo treba do naslednje seje Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo v Prilogi k temu sklepu opredeliti okužena in ogrožena območja na Nizozemskem, kjer se uporabljajo nadzorni ukrepi za zdravje živali iz Direktive 2005/94/ES, ter določiti trajanje navedene regionalizacije.
The Netherlands shall ensure that the protection and surveillance zones established in accordance with Article 16(1) of Directive 2005/94/EC comprise at least the areas listed in Parts A and B of the Annex to this Decision.
Nizozemska zagotovi, da okužena in ogrožena območja, vzpostavljena v skladu s členom 16(1) Direktive 2005/94/ES, obsegajo vsaj območja iz delov A in B Priloge k temu sklepu.
OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p.
Direktiva Sveta 2005/94/ES z dne 20. decembra 2005 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje aviarne influence in razveljavitvi Direktive 92/40/EGS (UL L 10, 14.1.2006, str. 16).
Protection zone as referred to in Article 1:
Ime
ISO Country Code
Nizozemska
Member State
Območje zajema:
Name
DEL B
The Netherlands
Ogroženo območje, kot je navedeno v členu 1:
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2086
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/2086
concerning certain interim protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in Sweden
o nekaterih začasnih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z visokopatogeno aviarno influenco podtipa H5N8 na Švedskem
(notified under document C(2016) 7852)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2016) 7852)
Sweden notified the Commission of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in a holding on its territory where poultry or other captive birds are kept and it immediately took the measures required pursuant to Directive 2005/94/EC, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones.
Švedska je Komisijo obvestila o izbruhu visokopatogene aviarne influence podtipa H5N8 na gospodarstvu na svojem ozemlju, kjer gojijo perutnino ali druge ptice v ujetništvu, ter nemudoma uvedla ukrepe v skladu z Direktivo 2005/94/ES, vključno z vzpostavitvijo okuženih in ogroženih območij.
The Commission has examined those measures in collaboration with Sweden, and it is satisfied that the borders of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authority in that Member State, are at a sufficient distance to the actual holding where the outbreak was confirmed.
Komisija je v sodelovanju s Švedsko preučila navedene ukrepe in presodila, da so meje okuženih in ogroženih območij, ki jih je vzpostavil pristojni organ v navedeni državi članici, dovolj oddaljene od dejanskega gospodarstva, na katerem je bil izbruh potrjen.
In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe the protection and surveillance zones established in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in Sweden at Union level.
Da bi preprečili kakršne koli nepotrebne motnje v trgovini v Uniji in se izognili tveganju, da tretje države sprejmejo neupravičene omejitve trgovanja, je treba na ravni Unije nemudoma opisati okužena in ogrožena območja, vzpostavljena v zvezi z visokopatogeno aviarno influenco na Švedskem.
Accordingly, pending the next meeting of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, the protection and surveillance zones in Sweden, where the animal health control measures as laid down in Directive 2005/94/EC are applied, should be defined in the Annex to this Decision and the duration of that regionalisation fixed.
Zato bi bilo treba do naslednje seje Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo v Prilogi k temu sklepu opredeliti okužena in ogrožena območja na Švedskem, kjer se uporabljajo nadzorni ukrepi za zdravje živali iz Direktive 2005/94/ES, ter določiti trajanje navedene regionalizacije.
Sweden shall ensure that the protection and surveillance zones established in accordance with Article 16(1) of Directive 2005/94/EC comprise at least the areas listed in Parts A and B of the Annex to this Decision.
Švedska zagotovi, da okužena in ogrožena območja, vzpostavljena v skladu s členom 16(1) Direktive 2005/94/ES, obsegajo vsaj območja iz delov A in B Priloge k temu sklepu.
ISO Country Code
Švedska
Name
dele občine Helsingborg (oznaka ADNS 01200), ki jih zajema krog s polmerom 3 kilometrov s središčem na koordinatah WGS84 dec. N56,053495 in E12,848939.
Sweden
DEL B
Those parts of Helsingborg municipality (ADNS code 01200) contained within a circle of a radius of three kilometres, centred on WGS84 dec. coordinates N56,053495 and E12,848939.
območje delov občin Helsingborg, Ängelholm, Bjuv in Åstorp (oznaka ADNS 01200), ki je večje od območja, opisanega pod okuženim območjem, in ki je znotraj kroga s polmerom 10 kilometrov s središčem na koordinatah WGS84 dec. N56,053495 in E12,848939.
Council Decision (EU) 2016/2087
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/2087
on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Iceland concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products
o podpisu, v imenu Evropske unije, Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Islandijo o dodatnih trgovinskih preferencialih za kmetijske proizvode
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 207(4) v povezavi s členom 218(5) Pogodbe,
Article 19 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area provides that the contracting Parties undertake to continue their efforts to achieve progressive liberalisation of agricultural trade between them.
V členu 19 Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru je določeno, da se pogodbenice zavežejo, da si bodo še naprej prizadevale za postopno liberalizacijo medsebojne trgovine s kmetijskimi proizvodi.
On 24 April 2012 the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with Iceland with a view to achieving greater liberalisation of bilateral trade in agricultural products under Article 19 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area.
Svet je 24. aprila 2012 pooblastil Komisijo, da začne pogajanja z Islandijo za večjo liberalizacijo dvostranske trgovine s kmetijskimi proizvodi na podlagi člena 19 Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru.
The negotiations were successfully concluded on 17 September 2015 and an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Iceland concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (‘the Agreement’) was initialled.
Pogajanja so bila 17. septembra 2015 uspešno končana in parafiran je bil Sporazum v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Islandijo o dodatnih trgovinskih preferencialih za kmetijske proizvode (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum).
Therefore, the Agreement should be signed on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion at a later date,
Zato bi bilo treba Sporazum podpisati v imenu Unije s pridržkom njegove poznejše sklenitve –
The signing on behalf of the Union of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and Iceland concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products is hereby authorised, subject to the conclusion of the Agreement [1].
Podpis Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Islandijo o dodatnih trgovinskih preferencialih za kmetijske proizvode se odobri v imenu Unije s pridržkom sklenitve [1] Sporazuma.
Done at Brussels, 14 November 2016.
V Bruslju, 14. novembra 2016
The text of the Agreement will be published in the Official Journal together with the decision on its conclusion.
Besedilo Sporazuma bo objavljeno v Uradnem listu skupaj s sklepom o njegovi sklenitvi.