natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the later of the following dates in case an equivalence decision has been adopted pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 for the purposes of Article 4 of that Regulation covering the OTC derivative contracts referred to in the Annex to this Regulation in respect of the relevant third country:
na poznejšega od naslednjih datumov, če se je sprejel sklep o enakovrednosti v skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 za namene člena 4 navedene uredbe, ki zajema pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC iz Priloge k tej uredbi, v zvezi z zadevno tretjo državo:
60 days after the date of entry into force of the decision adopted pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 for the purposes of Article 4 of that Regulation covering the OTC derivative contracts referred to in the Annex to this Regulation in respect of the relevant third country;
60 dni od začetka veljavnosti sklepa, sprejetega v skladu s členom 13(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 za namene člena 4 navedene uredbe, ki zajema pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC iz Priloge k tej uredbi, v zvezi z zadevno tretjo državo;
the date when the clearing obligation takes effect pursuant to paragraph 1.
datum, na katerega začne veljati obveznost kliringa v skladu z odstavkom 1.
This derogation shall only apply where the counterparties fulfil the following conditions:
To odstopanje se uporablja samo, če nasprotni stranki izpolnjujeta naslednje pogoje:
the counterparty established in a third country is either a financial counterparty or a non-financial counterparty;
nasprotna stranka s sedežem v tretji državi je finančna nasprotna stranka ali nefinančna nasprotna stranka;
the counterparty established in the Union is:
nasprotna stranka s sedežem v Uniji je:
a financial counterparty, a non-financial counterparty, a financial holding company, a financial institution or an ancillary services undertaking subject to appropriate prudential requirements and the counterparty referred to in point (a) is a financial counterparty; or
finančna nasprotna stranka, nefinančna nasprotna stranka, finančni holding, finančna institucija ali podjetje za pomožne storitve, za katero se uporabljajo ustrezne zahteve skrbnega in varnega poslovanja, nasprotna stranka iz točke (a) pa je finančna nasprotna stranka; ali
either a financial counterparty or a non-financial counterparty and the counterparty referred to in point (a) is a non-financial counterparty;
finančna nasprotna stranka ali nefinančna nasprotna stranka, nasprotna stranka iz točke (a) pa je finančna nasprotna stranka;
both counterparties are included in the same consolidation on a full basis in accordance to Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012;
obe nasprotni stranki sta v celoti vključeni v isto konsolidirano poročilo v skladu s členom 3(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012;
the counterparty established in the Union has notified its competent authority in writing that the conditions laid down in points (a), (b), (c) and (d) are met and, within 30 calendar days after receipt of the notification, the competent authority has confirmed that those conditions are met.
nasprotna stranka s sedežem v Uniji je svoj pristojni organ pisno obvestila, da so izpolnjeni pogoji iz točk (a), (b), (c) in (d), pristojni organ pa je v 30 koledarskih dneh po prejemu obvestila potrdil, da so navedeni pogoji izpolnjeni.
Minimum remaining maturity
Minimalna preostala zapadlost
For financial counterparties in Category 1, the minimum remaining maturity referred to in point (ii) of Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, at the date the clearing obligation takes effect, shall be:
Za finančne nasprotne stranke iz prve kategorije je minimalna preostala zapadlost iz točke (ii) člena 4(1)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 na datum, ko začne veljati obveznost kliringa:
50 years for contracts entered into or novated before 21 February 2016 that belong to the classes in Table 1 or Table 2 set out in the Annex;
50 let za pogodbe, sklenjene ali prenovljene pred 21. februarjem 2016, ki spadajo v razrede v tabeli 1 ali tabeli 2 iz Priloge;
3 years for contracts entered into or novated before 21 February 2016 that belong to the classes of Table 3 or Table 4 of the Annex;
3 leta za pogodbe, sklenjene ali prenovljene pred 21. februarjem 2016, ki spadajo v razrede v tabeli 3 ali tabeli 4 iz Priloge;
6 months for contracts entered into or novated on or after 21 February 2016 that belong to the classes of Table 1 to Table 4 of the Annex.
6 mesecev za pogodbe, sklenjene ali prenovljene po 21. februarju 2016, ki spadajo v razrede v tabelah 1 do 4 iz Priloge.
For financial counterparties in Category 2, the minimum remaining maturity referred to in point (ii) of Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, at the date the clearing obligation takes effect, shall be:
Za finančne nasprotne stranke iz prve kategorije je minimalna preostala zapadlost iz točke (ii) člena 4(1)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 na datum, ko začne veljati obveznost kliringa:
50 years for contracts entered into or novated before 21 May 2016 that belong to the classes in Table 1 or Table 2 set out in the Annex;
50 let za pogodbe, sklenjene ali prenovljene pred 21. majem 2016, ki spadajo v razrede v tabeli 1 ali tabeli 2 iz Priloge;
3 years for contracts entered into or novated before 21 May 2016 that belong to the classes of Table 3 or Table 4 of the Annex;
3 leta za pogodbe, sklenjene ali prenovljene pred 21. majem 2016, ki spadajo v razrede v tabeli 3 ali tabeli 4 iz Priloge;
6 months for contracts entered into or novated on or after 21 May 2016 that belong to the classes of Table 1 to Table 4 of the Annex.
6 mesecev za pogodbe, sklenjene ali prenovljene po 21. maju 2016, ki spadajo v razrede v tabelah 1 do 4 iz Priloge.
For financial counterparties in Category 3 and for transactions referred to in Article 3(2) of this Regulation concluded between financial counterparties, the minimum remaining maturity referred to in point (ii) of Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, at the date the clearing obligation takes effect, shall be:
Za finančne nasprotne stranke iz tretje kategorije in za transakcije iz člena 3(2) te Uredbe, sklenjene med finančnimi nasprotnimi strankami, je minimalna preostala zapadlost iz točke (ii) člena 4(1)(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 na datum, ko začne veljati obveznost kliringa:
50 years for contracts that belong to the classes of Table 1 or Table 2 of the Annex;
50 let za pogodbe, ki spadajo v razrede v tabeli 1 ali tabeli 2 iz Priloge;
3 years for contracts that belong to the classes of Table 3 or Table 4 of the Annex.
3 leta za pogodbe, ki spadajo v razrede v tabeli 3 ali tabeli 4 iz Priloge.
Where a contract is concluded between two financial counterparties belonging to different categories or between two financial counterparties involved in transactions referred to in Article 3(2), the minimum remaining maturity to be taken into account for the purposes of this Article shall be the longer remaining maturity applicable.
Če se sklene pogodba med dvema finančnima nasprotnima strankama, ki spadata v različni kategoriji, ali med dvema finančnima nasprotnima strankama, vključenima v transakcije iz člena 3(2), je minimalna preostala zapadlost, ki jo je treba upoštevati za namene tega člena, najdaljša od preostalih zapadlosti, ki se uporabljajo.
Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84).
Uredba (EU) št. 1095/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o ustanovitvi Evropskega nadzornega organa (Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge) in o spremembi Sklepa št. 716/2009/ES ter razveljavitvi Sklepa Komisije 2009/77/ES (UL L 331, 15.12.2010, str. 84).
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).
Uredba (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o bonitetnih zahtevah za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja ter o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 (UL L 176, 27.6.2013, str.
Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on Alternative Investment Fund Managers and amending Directives 2003/41/EC and 2009/65/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009 and (EU) No 1095/2010 (OJ L 174, 1.7.2011, p. 1).
1).
Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) (OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p. 32).
Direktiva 2011/61/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2011 o upraviteljih alternativnih investicijskih skladov in spremembah direktiv 2003/41/ES in 2009/65/ES ter uredb (ES) št. 1060/2009 in (EU) št. 1095/2010 (UL L 174, 1.7.2011, str.
Interest rate OTC derivatives classes subject to the clearing obligation
Direktiva 2009/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP) (UL L 302, 17.11.2009, str.
Basis swaps classes
PRILOGA
Type
Razredi obrestnih izvedenih finančnih instrumentov OTC, za katere velja obveznost kliringa
Reference Index
Tabela 1
Settlement Currency
Razredi zamenjav osnove (Basis swaps)
Maturity
Vrsta
Settlement Currency Type
Referenčni indeks
Optionality
Valuta poravnave
Notional Type
Zapadlost
Single currency
Vrsta valute poravnave
Constant or variable
Izbirnost (optionality)
Table 2
Vrsta osnove
Fixed-to-float interest rate swaps classes
ena valuta
Fixed-to-float
konstantna ali variabilna
Table 3
Tabela 2
Forward rate agreement classes
Razredi zamenjav fiksne za variabilno obrestno mero (Fixed-to-Float interest rate swaps)
Table 4
fiksna za variabilno
Overnight index swaps classes
Tabela 3
Basis
Razredi dogovorov o terminski obrestni meri (Forward rate agreements – FRA)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2206
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2206
amending Regulation (EC) No 1238/95 as regards the fees payable to the Community Plant Variety Office
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1238/95 glede pristojbin, ki se plačujejo Uradu Skupnosti za rastlinske sorte
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community Plant Variety Rights [1] (‘the Basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 113 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2100/94 z dne 27. julija 1994 o žlahtniteljskih pravicah v Skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba) in zlasti člena 113 Uredbe,
Article 3(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1238/95 [2] provides that the President of the Community Plant Variety Office (the Office) may allow alternative forms of payment of fees and surcharges, including by the delivery or remittance of certified cheques.
Člen 3(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1238/95 [2] določa, da predsednik Urada Skupnosti za rastlinske sorte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: urad) lahko dovoli alternativne oblike plačila pristojbin in dodatnih plačil, vključno z izročitvijo ali nakazilom certificiranih čekov.
However, it is considered too burdensome to holders to require certified cheques as a means of payment.
Vendar velja, da je zahteva po cerificiranih čekih kot plačilnem sredstvu za imetnike preveč obremenjujoča.
Moreover, it is necessary to ensure payments via electronic means.
Poleg tega je treba zagotoviti plačila prek elektronskih sredstev.
Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1238/95 requires a person making a payment of fees or surcharges to indicate his name and the purpose of such payment.
Člen 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1238/95 zahteva, da oseba, ki izvaja plačilo pristojbin in dodatnih plačil, navede svoje ime in namen plačila.
Taking into account that a payment may arrive to the Office for which it may be impossible to establish the identity of the person making the payment and to refund to this person, it would be appropriate that this money is retained by the Office as other revenue.
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da na urad lahko prispe plačilo, za katerega morda ni mogoče ugotoviti identitete osebe, ki izvaja plačilo, in ji ga povrniti, bi bilo primerno, da urad ta denar zadrži kot druge prihodke.
Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1238/95 sets out provisions concerning the level of the application fee payable to the Office for the processing of applications for grant of a Community plant variety right.
Člen 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1238/95 določa predpise v zvezi z višino prijavne pristojbine, ki se plačuje uradu za obdelavo prijav za podelitev žlahtniteljske pravice v Skupnosti.
In order to provide an effective, efficient and expeditious examination of applications, it is important to encourage the filing of applications by electronic means via web form.
Da bi zagotovili uspešno, učinkovito in hitro obdelavo prijav, je pomembno spodbujati vlaganje prijav elektronsko prek spletnega obrazca.
For this reason, it would be appropriate to reduce the fee paid for processing of the application in case of filing and submission of an application by electronic means.
Zato bi bilo primerno zmanjšati pristojbino za obdelavo prijave, če je prijava vložena in predložena elektronsko.
The wording in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1238/95 with regard to designation and entrustments of sub-offices and national agencies needs to be aligned with the Basic Regulation.
Besedilo člena 7(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1238/95 glede določitve in zadolžitev poduradov in nacionalnih ustanov je treba uskladiti z osnovno uredbo.
Article 7(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1238/95 regulates the refund of application fees for the applications which are not valid under Article 50 of the Basic Regulation.
Člen 7(7) Uredbe (ES) št. 1238/95 ureja povračilo prijavnih pristojbin za prijave, ki po členu 50 osnovne uredbe niso veljavne.
Based on the experience gained by the Office concerning the cost linked with the processing of applications for grant of Community plant variety rights which are not valid, it is appropriate to reduce the amount of the application fee retained by the Office.
Na podlagi izkušenj, ki jih je urad pridobil glede stroškov, povezanih z obdelavo prijav za podelitev žlahtniteljskih pravic v Skupnosti, ki niso veljavne, je primerno zmanjšati znesek prijavne pristojbine, ki ga urad zadrži.
Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1238/95 concerns fees for the technical examination of a variety.
Člen 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 1238/95 se nanaša na pristojbine za preskušanje sorte.
In case of an examination report on the result of a technical examination which has already been carried out by an entrusted Examination Office prior to the date of application for Community Plant Variety Right referred to in Article 8(5), it is appropriate to specify that the fee should be determined by the President of the Office after consultation of the Administrative Council of the Office.
V primeru poročila o rezultatih preskušanja, ki ga je zadolženi urad za preskušanje opravil že pred datumom prijave za žlahtniteljsko pravico v Skupnosti iz člena 8(5), je primerno točno navesti, da pristojbino določi predsednik urada po posvetovanju z upravnim svetom urada.
Article 12(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1238/95 provides that the President of the Office is to fix the fees in respect of the Official Gazette of the Office.
Člen 12(1)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1238/95 določa, da predsednik urada določi pristojbine v skladu z uradnim listom urada.
The periodical publication of the Official Gazette of the Office is only published in electronic version and no longer in print and it reflects the content of the databases of the Office.
Periodična publikacija uradnega lista urada se objavlja le v elektronski različici in ne več v tisku ter odraža vsebino zbirk podatkov urada.
Such a publication does not require any additional particular and thus a specific fee should be abolished.
Za takšno objavo publikacije niso potrebna nobena posebna sredstva, zato bi bilo treba posebno pristojbino odpraviti.
Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 1238/95 concerns surcharges.
Člen 13 Uredbe (ES) št. 1238/95 se nanaša na dodatna plačila.
Experience has shown that additional work of the Office, referred to in Article 13(1) and (2)(b), on variety denominations, due to their initial non-compliance to requirements laid down or on amendments in the event of prior conflicting right of a third party, is habitual and does not require increased resources.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da je dodatno delo urada iz člena 13(1) in (2)(b) glede poimenovanja sort zaradi njihove začetne neskladnosti z določenimi zahtevami ali glede sprememb v primeru predhodnih nasprotnih pravic tretje osebe, običajno in zanj niso potrebna višja sredstva.
Therefore, any surcharges for that additional work are not justified.
Zato dodatna plačila za to dodatno delo niso utemeljena.
Article 13(2)(a) provides that the Office may levy a surcharge to the annual fee if the holder has failed to pay the annual fee.
Člen 13(2)(a) določa, da urad lahko zahteva dodatno plačilo letne pristojbine, če imetnik ni plačal letne pristojbine.
In such cases the Office may initiate a procedure for cancellation of the protection.
V takšnih primerih urad lahko sproži postopek za preklic varstva.
Experience has shown that the Office does not levy a surcharge for the failure to pay the annual fee and therefore this provision should be deleted.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da urad ne zahteva dodatnega plačila zaradi neplačila letne pristojbine, zato je treba to določbo črtati.
Articles 93(3) and 94 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1239/95 [3] have not been taken over by Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 [4].
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 874/2009 [3] ni prevzela členov 93(3) in 94 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1239/95 [4].
Therefore, paragraphs (3) and (4) of Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1238/95 which refer to those provisions should be deleted.
Zato bi bilo treba črtati odstavka (3) in (4) člena 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 1238/95, ki se nanašata na navedene določbe.
Regulation (EC) No 1238/95 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1238/95 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
It would be appropriate that the proposed amendments apply as from 1 January 2016, to align with the beginning of the new financial year for the budget of the Office.
Primerno bi bilo, da se zaradi uskladitve z začetkom novega proračunskega leta za proračun urada predlagane spremembe uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2016.
In Article 3, paragraph 2 is amended as follows:
V členu 3 se odstavek 2 spremeni:
delivery or remittance of cheques which are made payable in euros to the Office;’;
uradu se izročijo ali nakažejo čeki, ki so plačljivi v eurih;“;
payment via electronic means, either by payment card or direct debit.’.
izvede se plačilo z elektronskimi sredstvi, s plačilno kartico ali direktno bremenitvijo.“.
In Article 5, the following paragraph 3 is added:
V členu 5 se doda naslednji odstavek 3:
If after enquiry with the bank concerned, the identity of the person making the payment cannot be confirmed and the amount cannot be refunded to any particular person, the amount shall be considered as other revenues within the deadlines outlined in the internal financial provisions of the Office referred to in Article 112 of the Basic Regulation and adopted by the Administrative Council of the Office.’.
Če po poizvedbi pri zadevni banki ni mogoče potrditi identitete osebe, ki je izvedla plačilo, in zneska ni mogoče povrniti določeni osebi, se znesek šteje kot drug prihodek v rokih, ki so opredeljeni v internih finančnih določbah urada iz člena 112 osnovne uredbe in jih sprejme upravni svet urada.“.
The applicant for a Community Plant Variety Right (the applicant) shall pay a fee of EUR 450 for the processing of an application filed and submitted via a web form by electronic means, made through the Office's online application system.
Prijavitelj za žlahtniteljsko pravico v Skupnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prijavitelj) plača pristojbino v višini 450 EUR za obdelavo prijave, vložene in predložene elektronsko s spletnim obrazcem prek spletnega prijavnega sistema urada.
The applicant shall pay a fee of EUR 650 for the processing of an application submitted by means other than through the Office's online application system.
Prijavitelj plača pristojbino v višini 650 EUR za obdelavo prijave, predložene drugače kot prek spletnega prijavnega sistema Urada.
The applicant shall take the necessary steps for payment of the application fee, in accordance with Article 3 of this Regulation, prior to or on the date on which the application is filed, directly at the Office or at one of the sub-offices established or national agencies entrusted pursuant to Article 30(4) of the Basic Regulation.’.
Prijavitelj mora plačati prijavno pristojbino v skladu s členom 3 te uredbe pred dnevom ali na dan, na katerega se prijava vloži na samem uradu ali enem od poduradov ali zadolženih nacionalnih ustanovah v skladu s členom 30(4) osnovne uredbe.“;
Where the application fee is received but the application is not valid under Article 50 of the basic Regulation, the Office shall retain EUR 150 of the application fee and refund the remainder when notifying the applicant of the deficiencies found in the application.’.
Kadar je prijavna pristojbina prejeta, prijava pa ni veljavna v skladu s členom 50 osnovne uredbe, urad 150 EUR prijavne pristojbine zadrži in povrne ostanek, ko prijavitelja obvesti o pomanjkljivostih v prijavi.“.
In Article 8(5), the following sentence is added:
V členu 8(5) se doda naslednji stavek:
‘The amount of that fee shall be determined by the President of the Office after consultation of the Administrative Council and shall be published in the Official Gazette of the Office.’.
„Znesek te pristojbine določi predsednik urada po posvetovanju z upravnim svetom in se objavi v uradnem listu urada.“.
In Article 12(1), point (c) is deleted.
V členu 12(1) se črta točka (c).
In Article 14, paragraphs 3 and 4 are deleted.
V členu 14 se črtata odstavka 3 in 4.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1239/95 of 31 May 1995 establishing implementing rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 as regards proceedings before the Community Plant Variety Office (OJ L 121, 1.6.1995, p. 37).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 874/2009 z dne 17. septembra 2009 o določitvi izvedbenih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2100/94 v zvezi s postopkom, ki poteka na Uradu Skupnosti za rastlinske sorte (UL L 251, 24.9.2009, str. 3).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 of 17 September 2009 establishing implementing rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 as regards proceedings before the Community Plant Variety Office (OJ L 251, 24.9.2009, p. 3).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1239/95 z dne 31. maja 1995 o uvedbi izvedbenih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2100/94 v zvezi s postopki, ki potekajo na Uradu Skupnosti za rastlinske sorte (UL L 121, 1.6.1995, str. 37).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2207
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/2207
Regulation (EU) 2015/2219 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) 2015/2219 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) and replacing and repealing Council Decision 2005/681/JHA
o Agenciji Evropske unije za usposabljanje na področju preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj (CEPOL) ter nadomestitvi in razveljavitvi Sklepa Sveta 2005/681/PNZ