natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, as explained in recital 81 some companies in Taiwan were found to import laminated solar modules (also known as laminated solar panels) into their bonded warehouses and at least some of those laminated solar panels were declared as solar cells.
Tako določene cene so se primerjale z ravnijo, ki je bila določena za odpravo škode za proizvajalce v Uniji v uvodni izjavi 415 prvotne uredbe.
Laminated solar module is an almost finished module, containing either 60 or 72 cells.
Povečanje uvoza iz Malezije in Tajvana se je v smislu količin štelo za znatno.
Only a very basic assembly operation must be performed to make a solar module from a laminated module i.e. an aluminium frame must be attached to it and a junction box must be added.
Ocenjena poraba Unije v obdobju poročanja kaže na podoben obseg tega uvoza.
This is why a laminated solar module should be declared as a solar module.
V smislu tržnega deleža moduli, ki jih v Unijo uvozijo nesodelujoče malezijske družbe in družbe, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da se v Maleziji izogibajo ukrepom, predstavljajo 9 % potrošnje modulov v Uniji.
This means that at least part of the Chinese cells imported into the Taiwanese free trade zones and bonded warehouses were in fact laminated solar modules and should have been declared as modules.
Moduli, ki jih v Unijo uvozijo nesodelujoče tajvanske družbe in družbe, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da se v Tajvanu izogibajo ukrepom, predstavljajo 7 % potrošnje modulov v Uniji.
As mentioned in recital 55 the exports of modules, which originally had Chinese origin from the Taiwanese FTZs constituted at least 24 % of Taiwanese imports of modules into the EU.
Celice, ki so bile v Unijo uvožene od nesodelujočih družb iz Tajvana, predstavljajo 3 % potrošnje EU.
The modules are the final product and the Chinese modules cannot be sold in Taiwan;
Primerjava stopnje odprave škode, kot je bila določena v prvotni uredbi, in tehtane povprečne izvozne cene je pokazala znatno nelojalno nižanje ciljnih cen.
therefore the only likely purpose of importing them into Taiwan must have been transhipment.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da je bil popravljalni učinek veljavnih ukrepov oslabljen v smislu količin in cen.
Therefore, the Commission concludes that a large proportion of modules consigned form the PRC must have been transhipped via Taiwan to the Union.
UKREPI
In addition, in 2014 OLAF started an investigation into alleged transhipment of solar cells and modules via Taiwan.
Glede na navedeno je bilo ugotovljeno izogibanje dokončni izravnalni dajatvi, uvedeni na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov ali panelov iz kristalnega silicija ter celic, kakršne se uporabljajo v fotonapetostnih modulih ali panelih iz kristalnega silicija, s poreklom iz LRK, s pretovarjanjem prek Malezije in Tajvana.
In addition, the Taiwanese authorities have carried out investigations into alleged circumvention practices at the same time and concluded that several companies, mainly traders, committed fraud by falsifying the origin of solar modules.
V skladu s členom 23(1) osnovne uredbe bi bilo treba veljavne ukrepe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK razširiti na uvoz enakega izdelka, dobavljenega iz Malezije in Tajvana, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Malezije ali Tajvana ali ne.
In light of the considerations above the existence of transhipment of the product under investigation via Taiwan has therefore been confirmed.
Ukrep, ki ga je treba razširiti, je ukrep iz člena 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013 za „vsa druga podjetja“, in sicer dokončna izravnalna dajatev v višini 11,5 %, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije, pred plačilom dajatve.
Insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the countervailing duty
V skladu s členom 23(3) in členom 24(5) osnovne uredbe, ki določata, da bi se moral vsak razširjeni ukrep uporabljati za uvoz, za katerega v Uniji velja registracija, uvedena z uredbo o začetku preiskave, bi bilo treba pobirati dajatve za navedeni registrirani uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in ključnih komponent, poslanih iz Malezije in Tajvana.
The investigation did not bring to light any due cause or economic justification for the transhipment operations other than the avoidance of the measures in force on solar cells and modules originating in the PRC.
ZAHTEVKI ZA IZVZETJE
No elements were found, other than the duty, which could be considered as a compensation for the costs of transhipment or import and re-export of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells or modules, in particular regarding transport and reloading, from the PRC via Malaysia and Taiwan.
Ena družba je predložila močno pomanjkljiv odgovor in se ni pravočasno odzvala na poziv k dopolnitvi, zato je Komisija njeno zahtevo zavrnila.
Evidence of subsidisation
Komisija je tako izvedla preveritvene obiske v prostorih osmih družb.
As set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013, Chinese exporting producers were found to benefit from a number of subsidy schemes granted by the Government of the PRC as well as regional and local governments in the PRC.
Od 28 družb ali skupin družb v Tajvanu, ki so se javile, je ena obvestila Komisijo, da je opustila dejavnost.
Subsequently, prima facie evidence showed that the producers of the product concerned in the PRC are likely to continue to benefit from a number of subsidies.
Ena družba je obvestila Komisijo, da ni imela prodaje v Unijo in zato ni bila upravičena do izvzetja.
Therefore, on 5 December 2015 an expiry review was initiated [11].
Ostalih 26 družb je predložilo izpolnjen vprašalnik in zaprosilo za izvzetje iz morebitnih razširjenih ukrepov v skladu s členom 23(6) osnovne uredbe.
No exporting producer from the PRC, or any other interested party, provided any evidence to the contrary.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 10 zgoraj, se je za tri tajvanske družbe, ki so predložile izpolnjene vprašalnike, izkazalo, da niso imele proizvodnih sredstev, zato je Komisija njihove zahteve zavrnila.
It is therefore concluded that the imported product under investigation still benefits from the subsidy schemes.
Za tri družbe v Maleziji in tri v Tajvanu, ki so bile preverjene, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so predložile napačne ali zavajajoče informacije.
Undermining of the remedial effect of the countervailing duty
V skladu s členom 28(4) osnovne uredbe so bile navedene družbe obveščene o nameri, da se informacij, ki so jih predložile, ne upošteva, ampak se uporabijo „razpoložljiva dejstva“, odobren pa jim je bil rok za predložitev dodatnih pojasnil („dopis iz člena 28“).
To assess whether the imported products had, in terms of quantities and prices, undermined the remedial effects of the measures in force on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and cells of the type used in crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules originating in the PRC, verified data from the cooperating exporting producers, Comext and Article 24(6) database were used as the best data available concerning quantities and prices of exports by non-cooperating companies.
Ti dopisi so vsebovali podrobne informacije o tem, katerih delov predloženih informacij teh družb Komisija ni nameravala upoštevati.
The prices so determined were compared to the injury elimination level established for Union producers in recital 415 of the original Regulation.
Dve tajvanski družbi nista odgovorili na dopis iz člena 28.
The increase of imports from Malaysia and Taiwan was considered to be significant in terms of quantities.
Komisija zato informacij skladno z napovedjo ni upoštevala.
The estimated Union consumption in the RP gives a similar indication about the significance of these imports.
Tri družbe v Maleziji so odgovorile, vendar iz razlogov, navedenih v nadaljevanju, niso mogle odpraviti dvomov Komisije.
In terms of market share, the modules imported into the Union from non-cooperating companies and the companies that were found to be circumventing in Malaysia account for 9 % of the Union consumption of modules.
Komisija tudi informacij teh družb skladno z napovedjo ni upoštevala.
The modules imported into the Union from non-cooperating companies and the companies that were found to be circumventing in Taiwan account for 7 % of the EU consumption.
Ena tajvanska družba je odgovorila in predložila dodatne informacije, ki jih je Komisija sprejela, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 107.
The cells that were imported into the Union from non-cooperating companies in Taiwan account for 3 % of the EU consumption.
Drugi preiskovalni organi v Uniji, na primer urad OLAF in nacionalni carinski organi, trenutno preiskujejo tudi uvoz teh petih družb v Unijo.
The comparison of the injury elimination level as established in the original Regulation and the weighted average export price showed significant underselling.
Da bi zaščitili te potekajoče preiskave, je pomembno, da se ne razkrijejo informacije, ki bi tretjim osebam lahko omogočile povezavo ugotovitev, ki sledijo, s posamezno družbo.
It was therefore concluded that the remedial effects of the measures in force are being undermined both in terms of quantities and prices.
Komisija zato ni navedla, katera ugotovitev velja za katero družbo.
MEASURES
Uvozniki, ki so izdelek v preiskavi kupili od teh družb in želijo vedeti, kakšen je položaj njihovega dobavitelja, lahko za podrobnejše informacije stopijo v stik neposredno s svojim dobaviteljem ali Komisijo.
Given the above, it was concluded that the definitive countervailing duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules or panels and cells of the type used in crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules or panels originating in the PRC was circumvented by transhipment from Malaysia and Taiwan.
Za namen te preiskave je bilo ugotovljeno naslednje:
In accordance with Article 23(1) of the basic Regulation, the measures in force on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC, should be extended to imports of the same product consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan, whether declared as originating in Malaysia and in Taiwan or not.
za dve od treh družb v Tajvanu je bilo ugotovljeno, da uvažata laminirane sončne module iz LRK, česar v izpolnjenem vprašalniku nista razkrili.
The measure to be extended should be the one established in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 for ‘All other companies’, which is a definitive countervailing duty of 11,5 % applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty.
Ena od teh družb je med preveritvenim obiskom priznala, da je ta uvoz v izpolnjenem vprašalniku zabeležen kot uvoz sončnih celic iz LRK.
In accordance with Articles 23(3) and 24(5) of the basic Regulation, which provides that any extended measure should apply to imports which entered the Union under registration imposed by the initiating Regulation, duties should be collected on those registered imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan.
Ta družba je zadevni uvoz tudi v svoji carinski deklaraciji navedla kot sončne celice.
REQUESTS FOR EXEMPTION
V primeru obeh tajvanskih družb so bili najdeni dokumenti, ki so jasno pokazali, da sta laminirane sončne module ponovno izvažali iz LRK v Unijo.
One company provided a highly deficient reply and did not reply in due time to the deficiency letter, so the Commission rejected its request.
Ti družbi v Tajvanu v odgovoru na dopis iz člena 28(4) nista predložili nobenih dodatnih pojasnil, saj nanj sploh nista odgovorili (glej uvodno izjavo 81 zgoraj).
Therefore, the Commission carried out the verification visits at the premises of eight companies.
Na podlagi razlogov, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah 81 in 82 zgoraj, in glede na ugotovitve v zvezi s spremembami vzorca trgovanja in pretovarjanja, kakor je opisano v oddelku 2 te uredbe, pri čemer tako eni kot drugi že sami po sebi zadostujejo, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so te družbe vpletene v izogibanje, zato ni bilo mogoče odobriti izvzetja v skladu s členom 23(6) osnovne uredbe.
Twenty-eight groups of companies or companies in Taiwan that made themselves known, of which one company informed the Commission that it ceased its activities.
Kot je pojasnjeno spodaj, so bila za naslednje tri malezijske družbe uporabljena dejstva v skladu s členom 28(1) osnovne uredbe, in sicer iz razlogov v nadaljevanju.
One company informed the Commission that it had no sales to the Union and therefore was not eligible for an exemption.
Ena malezijska družba je v izpolnjenem vprašalniku navedla, da je kupovala sončne celice v LRK ter da so bili moduli s kitajskimi celicami odpremljeni na druge trge in ne v Unijo.
The remaining 26 companies submitted a questionnaire reply and requested an exemption from the possibly extended measures in accordance with Article 23(6) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar pa ta družba ni mogla dokazati, da je zunaj LRK kupila zadostne količine celic, da bi lahko proizvedla tolikšno količino sončnih modulov, kot jih je izvozila v Unijo.
As explained in recital 10 above, three of the Taiwanese companies who submitted a questionnaire reply turned out not to have production assets, and the Commission therefore rejected their request.
Med preveritvenim obiskom je bilo ugotovljeno, da je za družba iz LRK uvažala laminirane sončne module, ki jih je ob uvozu goljufivo deklarirala kot solarno steklo.
Three companies in Malaysia and three companies in Taiwan that were verified were found to have provided false or misleading information.
Prav tako ta družba ni imela zadostnih proizvodnih zmogljivosti, da bi proizvedla tako količino izdelka v preiskavi, kot jo je izvozila.
In accordance with Article 28(4) of the basic Regulation, these companies were informed of the intention to disregard the information submitted by them and to apply ‘facts available’, and were granted a time limit to provide further explanations (‘Article 28 letter’).
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da je imela družba povezave s kitajsko družbo, dejavno na področju fotovoltaike.
These letters contained specific information as to which parts of the information submitted by these companies the Commission intended to disregard.
Malezijska družba je v odgovoru na dopis iz člena 28(4) zanikala, da bi v Unijo izvažala module s kitajskimi celicami.
Two Taiwanese companies did not reply to the Article 28 letter.
Trdila je, da je v Unijo izvažala module z južnokorejskimi celicami, ki pa so bile laminirane na Kitajskem.
Therefore, the Commission disregarded the information as announced.
Družba je tudi odgovorila, da je tako „laminirano steklo“ naročila zato, ker njen laminator ni bil dovolj kakovosten.
The three companies in Malaysia did reply, but could not dissipate the doubts of the Commission for the reasons set out below.
Vendar pa je bilo, kot je navedeno zgoraj, to steklo goljufivo deklarirano kot solarno steklo.
Also for those companies, the Commission disregarded the information as announced.
Družba poleg tega ni mogla dokazati, da je v Južni Koreji kupila zadostne količine sončnih celic za vse module, ki jih je izvozila v Unijo.
One Taiwanese company replied and provided additional information, which the Commission accepted, as set out in recital 107.
Družba je tudi trdila, da so po aprilu 2014 nastopile spremembe v njenem lastništvu.
Other investigative authorities in the Union, like OLAF and national customs authorities, are currently investigating imports into the Union of these five companies as well.
Vendar pa sprememba v lastništvu ni spremenila dejstva, da obstajajo povezave med malezijsko in kitajsko družbo, saj je glavni dobavitelj surovin malezijske družbe še naprej ostal kitajski proizvajalec modulov.
In order to protect these ongoing investigations, it is important not to divulge any information that would enable third parties to link the findings in the following recitals to a specific company.
Zato pojasnila, ki jih je predložila družba v svojem odgovoru na dopis iz člena 28(4), niso spremenila ugotovitve, da je v Unijo ponovno izvažala kitajske laminirane sončne module in da so bile vsaj v delu modulov, izvoženih v EU, uporabljene kitajske celice.
Hence, the Commission has not specified which company is concerned by which findings.
Glede na ugotovitve v zvezi s spremembami vzorca trgovanja in pretovarjanja, kakor je opisano v oddelku 2 ter v uvodnih izjavah 85 do 88, pri čemer tako ene kot druge že same po sebi zadostujejo, izvzetja, kakor ga je zahtevala ta malezijska družba, v skladu s členom 23(6) osnovne uredbe ni bilo mogoče odobriti.
Importers that have purchased the product under investigation from those companies and would like to understand what exactly is the situation of their supplier may contact directly their supplier, or the Commission, in view of having more detailed information.
Za drugo družbo v Maleziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni imela zadostnih proizvodnih zmogljivosti, da bi proizvedla tako količino izdelka v preiskavi, kot jo je izvozila.
For the purpose of this investigation the following details have been established:
Ta družba ni mogla predložiti pogodb za nakup strojev za proizvodnjo sončnih modulov.
Two of those three companies in Taiwan were found to import laminated solar modules from the PRC that they did not reveal in their questionnaire reply.
Ta družba prav tako ni razkrila svoje povezave s kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom in nakupov izdelka v preiskavi od povezane družbe.
One of those companies admitted during the verification visit that they reported these imports in their questionnaire reply as imports of solar cells from the PRC.
Poleg tega je ta družba predložila dokumente z navedenimi različnimi datumi ustanovitve.
This company had also reported these imports as solar cells in their customs declaration.
Preiskava je odkrila, da je bila družba ustanovljena leta 2013, tj. po začetku prvotne protidampinške in protisubvencijske preiskave, in da je opustila proizvodnjo kmalu po koncu maja 2015, tj. po uvedbi registracije za malezijske module.
In case of both those Taiwanese companies, documents were found clearly showing that they re-exported the laminated solar modules from the PRC to the Union.
Ta družba je v svojem odgovoru na dopis iz člena 28(4) trdila, da večina malih družb v Maleziji za svoje zaposlene nima pogodb o zaposlitvi.
These two companies in Taiwan did not provide any additional clarifications in reply to the Article 28(4) letter, as they did not reply at all (see above recital 81).
Poleg tega je trdila, da je imela zadostne zmogljivosti za izdelavo navedenih količin.
For the reasons set out above in recitals 81 and 82 as well as in view of the findings with regard to the change in the pattern of trade and transhipment practices, as set out in section 2 of the present Regulation, each of which are sufficient on their own, these companies were found to be engaged in circumvention practices and could not be granted an exemption in accordance with Article 23(6) of the basic regulation.
Družba je tudi trdila, da je zaposlila prodajno osebje kitajske družbe, vendar z njo ni imela formalnih povezav.
For the following three Malaysian companies, as explained below, use was made of facts available in accordance with Article 28(1) of the Basic Regulation for the following reasons.
Ta dodatna pojasnila niso mogla spremeniti zgoraj navedenih sklepov.
One Malaysian company reported in their questionnaire reply that they purchased solar cells in the PRC, and they specified that the modules with Chinese cells were shipped to other markets than the Union.
Družba zlasti ni uspela dokazati, da je bila sposobna proizvesti izvožene količine.
However, this company could not prove that it bought sufficient quantities of cells outside of the PRC that would enable them to produce the amount of solar modules that they exported to the Union.
Poleg tega so bile precejšnje razlike med količino uvoženih celic, ki jih je navedla družba, in količino celic, ki jih je navedel njen dobavitelj.
During the verification visit this company was found to import laminated solar modules from the PRC, which it fraudulently declared as imports of solar glass.
Tudi dejstvo, da družba zaposluje osebje kitajske družbe, potrjuje ugotovljene povezave s kitajsko družbo.
This company was also found not to have sufficient production capacity to produce the volumes of the product under investigation that they exported.
Glede na ugotovitve v zvezi s spremembami vzorca trgovanja in pretovarjanja, kakor je opisano v oddelku 2 ter v uvodnih izjavah 90 in 91, pri čemer tako ene kot druge že same po sebi zadostujejo, izvzetja, kakor ga je zahtevala ta malezijska družba, v skladu s členom 23(6) osnovne uredbe ni bilo mogoče odobriti.
This company was also found to have links to a Chinese company active in the photovoltaic business.
Druga družba v Maleziji je bila ustanovljena junija 2013, tj. po začetku prvotne protidampinške in protisubvencijske preiskave, in je module začela prodajati decembra 2013, tj. takoj po uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških in izravnalnih dajatev iz prvotne uredbe.
In its reply to the Article 28(4) letter, the Malaysian company denied that they exported modules with Chinese cells to the Union.
Družba je v obdobju poročanja proizvajala fotonapetostne module iz polikristalnega silicija, ki so bili povečini uvoženi iz Tajvana.
However, as stated above, this was fraudulently declared as solar glass.
Drugič, celice so bile prvotno v številnih primerih kupljene prek kitajske družbe in/ali drugih kitajskih družb, pri čemer so bile fizično prepeljane iz tretje države (v glavnem iz Tajvana) v LRK, preden so bile očitno prepeljane naprej do družbe v Maleziji.
Furthermore, the company was not able to demonstrate that they had bought sufficient cells in South Korea for all modules it exported to the Union.
Tretjič, večina modulov, prodanih tretjim državam v obdobju poročanja, je bila prodana podjetju v ZDA, ki je povezano s to kitajsko družbo.
The company also argued that there had been a change in ownership since April 2014.
Četrtič, pravni zastopnik kitajske družbe je bil med preiskavo na kraju samem prisoten v malezijski družbi.
This change of ownership, however, did not change the fact that links do exist between the Malaysian and Chinese companies in the sense that the Malaysian company's main supplier of raw materials continued to be the Chinese module manufacturer.
Petič, zdi se, da so predloge „prodajnih pogodb“ kitajske in tajvanske družbe enake, tako po strukturi kot po vsebini.
Therefore, the explanations provided by the company in reply to the Article 28(4) letter were not such as to lead to a change in the finding that they re-exported to the Union the Chinese laminated solar modules and that at least some of the modules exported to the EU used Chinese cells.
Šestič, predstavnik kitajske družbe je v spletnem videoposnetku izjavil, da kitajska družba malezijski družbi zagotavlja tehnično svetovanje in nadzor.
In view of the findings with regard to the change in the pattern of trade and transhipment practices, as set out in section 2, and the findings as set out in the recitals 85 to 88 above, each of which are sufficient on their own, the exemption as requested by this Malaysian company could not be granted in accordance with Article 23(6) of the basic Regulation.
Drugi elementi, ki jih ta malezijska družba ni razkrila med preiskavo na kraju samem, ampak so jih zagotovili carinski organi ene od držav članic Unije, so naslednji:
Another company in Malaysia was found not to have sufficient production capacity to produce the volumes of the product under investigation that it exported.
Malezijska družba je sklenila pogodbo o uporabi blagovne znamke z isto kitajsko družbo, katere zaveza je bila sprejeta; po tej pogodbi je imela malezijska družba dovoljenje za uporabo blagovne znamke kitajske družbe, če so tako zahtevale stranke.
The same company was not able to supply any labour contracts for its employees;
Poleg tega je eno prvih strank v Uniji malezijski družbi predstavil trgovski zastopnik kitajske družbe.
hence it was not able to prove that it had any employees during the investigation period.
In kot zadnje, carinski organi ene od držav članic Unije so prvo pošiljko malezijske družbe preiskali, ker so bili moduli označeni z napisom „Made in China“ in blagovno znamko kitajske družbe.