natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Coordination Group Secretariat invited the other Member States and the applicant to submit written comments to the referral and comments were submitted by Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom.
Sekretariat koordinacijske skupine je druge države članice in vložnika pozval k predložitvi pisnih pripomb na sporne točke in pripombe so predložili Belgija, Danska, Francija, Nemčija, Nizozemska, Španija in Združeno kraljestvo.
The referral was also discussed between the Member States' Competent Authorities for biocidal products in the meeting of the Coordination Group of 11 November 2014.
Sporne točke so obravnavali tudi pristojni organi držav članic za biocidne proizvode na sestanku koordinacijske skupine z dne 11. novembra 2014.
As no agreement was reached within the Coordination Group, in accordance with Article 36(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 the reference Member State referred to the Commission on 13 March 2015 a detailed statement of the matters on which Member States were unable to reach agreement and the reasons for their disagreement.
Ker v koordinacijski skupini ni bil dosežen dogovor, je v skladu s členom 36(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 referenčna država članica Komisiji 13. marca 2015 predložila podroben opis zadev, o katerih države članice niso mogle doseči dogovora, ter razloge za njihovo nestrinjanje.
A copy of this statement was also forwarded to the Member States concerned referred to in Article 35(2) of that Regulation and the applicant.
Izvod tega opisa je bil poslan tudi zadevnim državam članicam iz člena 35(2) navedene uredbe in vložniku.
Concerning the efficacy against rats in and around buildings, the results of the laboratory tests and of one of the field trials submitted by the applicant demonstrate an acceptable level of efficacy against the criteria established in the EU guidance on efficacy evaluation of rodenticides (hereafter ‘the EU guidance’) [2].
Rezultati laboratorijskih preskusov in eden od preskusov na prostem, ki jih je uporabil vložnik, v zvezi z učinkovitostjo proti podganam v stavbah in okoli njih dokazujejo sprejemljivo raven učinkovitosti glede na merila iz smernic EU za ocenjevanje učinkovitosti rodenticidov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: smernice EU) [2].
In addition, the availability of at least one valid field trial was deemed to be in line with the EU guidance and acceptable to demonstrate the efficacy of a rodenticide by the Coordination Group in a previous similar case [3].
Poleg tega je koordinacijska skupina v podobnem prejšnjem primeru razpoložljivost najmanj enega veljavnega preskusa na prostem ocenila za skladno s smernicami EU in sprejemljivo za dokazovanje učinkovitosti rodenticida [3].
Concerning the efficacy against rats in sewers, the reference Member State used the results of one of the field trials submitted by the applicant demonstrating an acceptable level of efficacy to overcome the inconclusive results of the palatability studies.
V zvezi z učinkovitostjo v kanalizaciji proti podganam je referenčna država članica uporabila rezultate enega od preskusov na prostem, ki jih je predložil vložnik, za dokazovanje sprejemljive ravni učinkovitosti, da bi bili preseženi neopredeljivi rezultati preskusov okusa.
The same approach was used previously by the concerned Member State during the evaluation of a similar product, but with positive results from three field trials.
Isti pristop je zadevna država članica predhodno uporabila med ocenjevanjem podobnega proizvoda, vendar s pozitivnimi rezultati treh preskusov na prostem.
Concerning the use against mice, the laboratory studies do not fulfil the criteria established in the EU guidance.
V zvezi z uporabo proti mišim laboratorijski preskusi ne izpolnjujejo meril iz smernic EU.
However, that EU guidance also establishes that results of field trials might outweigh those of laboratory trials.
Vendar pa smernice EU določajo tudi, da imajo rezultati preskusov na prostem lahko večjo težo od laboratorijskih preskusov.
In the present case, the results of one of the field trials demonstrate an acceptable level of efficacy against the criteria established in the available EU guidance.
V obravnavani zadevi je bila v enem od preskusov na prostem dokazana sprejemljiva raven učinkovitosti glede na merila iz razpoložljivih smernic EU.
In the light of the elements referred to in recitals 7 to 9, the Commission considers the conclusions reached by the reference Member State on the three points of disagreement to be valid.
Ob upoštevanju elementov iz uvodnih izjav 7 in 9 Komisija meni, da so ugotovitve referenčne države članice glede treh spornih točk tehtne.
The Commission also notes that the conclusions reached by the reference Member State on the basis of these elements and of the judgement of its experts, as provided for by paragraph 12 of Annex VI to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, were supported by those Member States having authorised the contested product through mutual recognition.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da so ugotovitve referenčne države članice na podlagi teh elementov in presoje njenih strokovnjakov, kot določa odstavek 12 Priloge VI Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012, podprle države članice, ki so izdale dovoljenje za sporni proizvod na podlagi medsebojnega priznavanja.
Since the legal basis for this Decision is Article 36(3) of that Regulation, this decision should be addressed to all Member States by virtue of Article 36(4) of that Regulation.
Ker je pravna podlaga za ta sklep člen 36(3) navedene uredbe, bi moral biti ta sklep naslovljen na vse države članice na podlagi člena 36(4) navedene uredbe.
This Decision applies to the product identified by the asset number UK-0005252-0000, as provided for by the Register for Biocidal Products.
Ta sklep se uporablja za proizvod s številko sredstva UK-0005252-0000, kakor je določen v registru biocidnih proizvodov.
The product meets the condition laid down in Article 19(1)(b)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of being sufficiently effective for use in and around buildings against mice and rats and in sewers against rats.
Proizvod izpolnjuje pogoj iz člena 19(1)(b)(i) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 glede zadostne učinkovitosti za uporabo v stavbah in okoli njih proti mišim in podganam ter v kanalizaciji proti podganam.
Appendices to Chapter 7.
Glej Tehnične zapiske z navodili za ocenjevanje proizvoda (Technical Notes for Guidance on Product Evaluation).
Product Type 14: Efficacy Evaluation of Rodenticidal Biocidal Products, available on the website http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/16960215/bpd_guid_revised_appendix_chapter_7_pt14_2009_en.pdf
Vrsta proizvodov 14: Ocenjevanje učinkovitosti biocidnih proizvodov kot rodenticidov (Efficacy Evaluation of Rodenticidal Biocidal Products), na voljo na spletni strani (v angleškem jeziku) http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/16960215/bpd_guid_revised_appendix_chapter_7_pt14_2009_en.pdf
See the agreement reached at the 10th Coordination Group meeting regarding the efficacy of a rodenticide biocidal product containing coumatetralyl against mice, available at https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/0ca55b45-1c74-4c78-b125-de52fd53c08c/Racumin%20Paste_disagreement%20to%20CG_formal_with%20outcome_public.pdf
Dodatki k poglavju 7.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1752
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/1752
(notified under document C(2015) 6519)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2015) 6519)
African swine fever is a highly contagious and fatal infection of domestic pigs and wild boar, with the potential for rapid spread, notably through products obtained from infected animals and contaminated inanimate objects.
Afriška prašičja kuga je zelo nalezljiva in smrtna okužba domačih in divjih prašičev z možnostjo hitrega širjenja, zlasti s proizvodi, pridobljenimi iz okuženih živali in kontaminiranih neživih predmetov.
Due to the African swine fever situation in Russia and in Belarus, the Commission adopted Implementing Decision 2013/426/EU [2] laying down measures which provide amongst others for appropriate cleansing and disinfection of ‘livestock vehicles’ having transported live animals and feed and which enter the Union from those two countries.
Zaradi razmer glede afriške prašičje kuge v Rusiji in Belorusiji je Komisija sprejela Izvedbeni sklep 2013/426/EU [2] o določitvi ukrepov, ki med drugim predvidevajo ustrezno čiščenje in razkuževanje „vozil za prevoz rejnih živali“, ki so prevažala žive živali in krmo ter vstopajo v Unijo iz navedenih držav.
Following recent notifications of African swine fever outbreaks in Ukraine, the existing measures of cleansing and disinfection provided for in Implementing Decision 2013/426/EU should also be extended to the vehicles entering the Union from Ukraine.
Po nedavnih obvestilih o izbruhih afriške prašičje kuge v Ukrajini bi bilo treba obstoječe ukrepe čiščenja in razkuževanja iz Izvedbenega sklepa 2013/426/EU razširiti tudi na vozila, ki vstopajo v Unijo iz Ukrajine.
The list of third countries and parts of territory of third countries where the presence of African swine fever virus is confirmed, as provided for in Annex I of Implementing Decision 2013/426/EU, should therefore be amended accordingly.
Seznam tretjih držav in delov ozemlja tretjih držav, v katerih je potrjena prisotnost virusa afriške prašičje kuge, kot je določen v Prilogi I k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2013/426/EU, bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Due to the unfavourable disease situation as regards African swine fever in the countries neighbouring the Union borders, and taking into account the epidemiology of African swine fever and the measures applicable in the Union as regards that disease, it is appropriate to extend this period until 31 December 2019.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
V Prilogi I k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2013/426/EU se za besedo „Rusija“ doda beseda „Ukrajina“.
In Annex I of Implementing Decision 2013/426/EU, the word ‘Ukraine’ is added after the word ‘Russia’.
Člen 4a Izvedbenega sklepa 2013/426/EU se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 2
„Člen 4a
Article 4a of Implementing Decision 2013/426/EU is replaced by the following:
Ta sklep se uporablja do 31. decembra 2019.“
‘Article 4a
Člen 3
This decision shall apply until 31 December 2019.’
Ta sklep je naslovljen na države članice.
Article 3
V Bruslju, 29. septembra 2015
Done at Brussels, 29 September 2015.
Član Komisije
For the Commission
UL L 24, 30.1.1998, str. 9.
Member of the Commission
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2013/426/EU z dne 5. avgusta 2013 o ukrepih za preprečevanje vnosa v Unijo virusa afriške prašičje kuge iz nekaterih tretjih držav ali delov ozemlja tretjih držav, v katerih je potrjena prisotnost navedene bolezni, in razveljavitvi Sklepa 2011/78/EU (UL L 211, 7.8.2013, str. 5).
OJ L 24, 30.1.1998, p. 9.
Izvedbeni sklep 2013/426/EU se uporablja do 31. decembra 2015.
Commission Implementing Decision 2013/426/EU of 5 August 2013 on measures to prevent the introduction into the Union of the African swine fever virus from certain third countries or parts of the territory of third countries in which the presence of that disease is confirmed and repealing Decision 2011/78/EU (OJ L 211, 7.8.2013, p. 5).
Zaradi neugodnega stanja v zvezi z afriško prašičjo kugo v sosedskih državah Unije ter ob upoštevanju epidemiologije afriške prašičje kuge in ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo v Uniji v zvezi z navedeno boleznijo, je primerno to obdobje podaljšati do 31. decembra 2019.
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1753
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/1753
of 30 September 2015
z dne 30. septembra 2015
on confirming the participation of Italy in enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection
o potrditvi priključitve Italije okrepljenemu sodelovanju na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 328(1) and 331(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti člena 328(1) in člena 331(1) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the notification by Italy of its intention to participate in enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection,
ob upoštevanju uradnega obvestila Italije, da se namerava priključiti okrepljenemu sodelovanju na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva,
On 10 March 2011, the Council decided to authorise enhanced cooperation between Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection.
Svet je 10. marca 2011 sklenil, da Avstriji, Belgiji, Bolgariji, Cipru, Češki republiki, Danski, Estoniji, Finski, Franciji, Grčiji, Irski, Latviji, Litvi, Luksemburgu, Madžarski, Malti, Nemčiji, Nizozemski, Poljski, Portugalski, Romuniji, Slovaški, Sloveniji, Švedski in Združenemu kraljestvu dovoli vzpostaviti okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva.
On 17 December 2012, the European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 [2].
Evropski parlament in Svet sta 17. decembra 2012 sprejela Uredbo (EU) št. 1257/2012 [2].
On 17 December 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 1260/2012 [3].
Svet je 17. decembra 2012 sprejel Uredbo (EU) št. 1260/2012 [3].
Italy has notified its intention to participate in enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection by letter dated 2 July 2015, which the Commission registered as received on 20 July 2015.
Italija je z dopisom z dne 2. julija 2015, katerega prejem je Komisija evidentirala 20. julija 2015, uradno sporočila svojo namero o priključitvi okrepljenemu sodelovanju na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva.
The Commission notes that neither Decision 2011/167/EU nor Regulations (EU) No 1257/2012 and (EU) No 1260/2012 prescribe any particular conditions of participation in enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection and that Italy's participation should strengthen the benefits of this enhanced cooperation,
Komisija ugotavlja, da Sklep 2011/167/EU in uredbi (EU) št. 1257/2012 in (EU) št. 1260/2012 ne predpisujejo nobenih posebnih pogojev za priključitev okrepljenemu sodelovanju na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva in da bi priključitev Italije povečala koristi tega okrepljenega sodelovanja –
Participation of Italy in enhanced cooperation
Priključitev Italije okrepljenemu sodelovanju
The participation of Italy in enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection authorised by Decision 2011/167/EU is confirmed.
Priključitev Italije okrepljenemu sodelovanju na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva, odobrenemu s Sklepom 2011/167/EU, se potrdi.
Regulations (EU) No 1257/2012 and (EU) No 1260/2012 shall apply to Italy in accordance with this Decision.
Uredbi (EU) št. 1257/2012 in (EU) št. 1260/2012 se za Italijo uporabljata v skladu s tem sklepom.
Notification to be provided by Italy
Uradno obvestilo, ki ga zagotovi Italija
Italy shall notify the Commission of the measures adopted in accordance with Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 by the date of application of that Regulation.
Italija Komisijo do datuma začetka uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 1257/2012 uradno obvesti o ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 9 navedene uredbe.
Italy shall notify the Commission of the measures adopted in accordance with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 by the date of application of that Regulation or in the case where the Unified Patent Court does not have exclusive jurisdiction in Italy with regard to European patents with unitary effect on the date of application of that Regulation, by the date from which the Unified Patent Court has such exclusive jurisdiction in Italy.
Italija uradno obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1257/2012, do datuma začetka uporabe navedene uredbe ali če na datum začetka uporabe navedene uredbe Enotno patentno sodišče v Italiji nima izključne pristojnosti v zvezi z evropskimi patenti z enotnim učinkom, do datuma, od katerega Enotno patentno sodišče takšno izključno pristojnost v Italiji ima.
Entry into force and date of application of Regulations (EU) No 1257/2012 and (EU) No 1260/2012 in Italy
Začetek veljavnosti in uporabe uredb (EU) št. 1257/2012 in (EU) št. 1260/2012 v Italiji
Regulations (EU) No 1257/2012 and (EU) No 1260/2012 shall enter into force in Italy on the day following that of the publication of this Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Uredbi (EU) št. 1257/2012 in (EU) št. 1260/2012 začneta v Italiji veljati dan po objavi tega sklepa v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Regulations (EU) No 1257/2012 and (EU) No 1260/2012 shall apply to Italy on the date of the entry into force of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court.
Uredbi (EU) št. 1257/2012 in (EU) št. 1260/2012 se v Italiji začneta uporabljati na datum začetka veljavnosti sporazuma o Enotnem sodišču za patente.
Done at Brussels, 30 September 2015.
V Bruslju, 30. septembra 2015
OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 53.
UL L 76, 22.3.2011, str. 53.
Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2012 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection (OJ L 361, 31.12.2012, p. 1).
Uredba (EU) št. 1257/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2012 o izvajanju okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva (UL L 361, 31.12.2012, str. 1).
Council Regulation (EU) No 1260/2012 of 17 December 2012 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements (OJ L 361, 31.12.2012, p. 89).
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1260/2012 z dne 17. decembra 2012 o izvajanju okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva v zvezi z veljavno ureditvijo prevajanja (UL L 361, 31.12.2012, str. 89).
Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1763
Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2015/1763
of 1 October 2015
z dne 1. oktobra 2015
concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Burundi
o omejevalnih ukrepih glede na razmere v Burundiju
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 29 Pogodbe,
On 16 March 2015, the European Union reiterated the position it has taken since the beginning of the crisis in Burundi, that only through dialogue leading to consensus, in compliance with the Arusha Agreement for Peace and Reconciliation of 2000 and the Burundian Constitution, could a lasting political solution be found in the interests of security and democracy for all Burundi's people.
Evropska unija je 16. marca 2015 ponovila svoje stališče, ki ga ima že od začetka krize v Burundiju, da je do trajne politične rešitve, ki bi vsem prebivalcem Burundija prinesla varnost in demokracijo, mogoče priti le z dialogom, ki bo vodil do soglasja, ob upoštevanju Sporazuma iz Aruše o miru in spravi iz leta 2000 in burundijske ustave.
On 18 May 2015, the Council condemned the attempted coup in Burundi and also any act of violence or abuse of the constitutional order, whoever the perpetrators may be, and expressed its deep concern at the situation in Burundi.
Svet je 18. maja 2015 obsodil poskus državnega udara v Burundiju in vsakršno nasilje ali zlorabo ustavnega reda, ne glede na to, kdo ju izvaja, ter izrazil globoko zaskrbljenost zaradi razmer v Burundiju.
The Council also expressed its determination to take all measures necessary against Burundian parties whose actions perpetuate violence and hamper the search for a political solution.
Svet je tudi izrazil, da je odločen, da bo sprejel vse potrebne ukrepe proti burundijskim stranem, ki bi s svojimi dejanji še naprej spodbujale nasilje in ovirale iskanje politične rešitve.
On 22 June 2015, the Council expressed its deep concern at both the number of victims and the number of cases of serious human rights violations reported since the beginning of the crisis, particularly those abuses attributed to the security forces and to members of the Imbonerakure.
Svet je 22. junija 2015 izrazil resno zaskrbljenost zaradi števila žrtev in številnih primerov hudih kršitev človekovih pravic, ki so bili prijavljeni od začetka krize, zlasti zlorab, ki jih pripisujejo varnostnim silam in pripadnikom Imbonerakure.
The Council also reiterated that it was determined to adopt, if necessary, targeted restrictive measures against those whose actions might have led or might lead to acts of violence and repression and serious human rights violations, and/or might hamper the search for a political solution within the framework proposed by the African Union and the East African Community.
Svet je poleg tega ponovno izrazil, da je odločen, da po potrebi sprejme ciljne omejevalne ukrepe proti tistim, katerih dejanja so lahko privedla ali lahko privedejo do nasilnih dejanj, represije in hudih kršitev človekovih pravic ter/ali bi lahko ovirala iskanje politične rešitve v okviru Afriške unije in Vzhodnoafriške skupnosti.
On 23 July 2015, the European Union regretted that the Burundi government had not fully implemented the relevant decisions of the African Union and the East African Community that would have paved the way for credible and inclusive elections.
Evropska unija je 23. julija 2015 obžalovala, da burundijska vlada ni v celoti izvedla ustreznih sklepov Afriške unije in Vzhodnoafriške skupnosti, s katerimi bi omogočila verodostojne in vključujoče volitve.
The Council has remained seriously concerned about the situation in Burundi.
Svet je še naprej močno zaskrbljen zaradi razmer v Burundiju.
In the current circumstances and, in line with the Council Conclusions of June 2015, travel restrictions and an asset freeze should be imposed against persons, entities or bodies undermining democracy or obstructing the search for a political solution in Burundi, including by acts of violence, repression or inciting violence, persons, entities or bodies involved in planning, directing, or committing acts that violate international human rights law or international humanitarian law, as applicable, or that constitute serious human rights abuses, in Burundi, as well as persons, entities or bodies associated with them.
Glede na trenutne razmere in v skladu s sklepi Sveta iz meseca junija 2015 bi bilo treba omejiti potovanja in zamrzniti sredstva osebam, subjektom ali organom, ki spodkopavajo demokracijo ali ovirajo iskanje politične rešitve v Burundiju, vključno z nasilnimi dejanji, represijo ali pozivanjem k nasilju, in osebam, subjektom ali organom, ki so vključeni v načrtovanje, usmerjanje ali izvedbo dejanj, ki kršijo mednarodno pravo s področja človekovih pravic ali mednarodno humanitarno pravo, kar je ustrezno, ali ki predstavljajo hude kršitve človekovih pravic v Burundiju, ter osebam, subjektom ali organom, ki so z njimi povezani.
Member States shall take the measures necessary to prevent the entry into, or transit through, their territories of:
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, da preprečijo vstop na ali tranzit preko svojih ozemelj:
natural persons undermining democracy or obstructing the search for a political solution in Burundi, including by acts of violence, repression or inciting violence;
fizičnim osebam, ki spodkopavajo demokracijo ali ovirajo iskanje politične rešitve v Burundiju, vključno z nasilnimi dejanji, represijo ali pozivanjem k nasilju;
natural persons involved in planning, directing, or committing acts that violate international human rights law or international humanitarian law, as applicable, or that constitute serious human rights abuses, in Burundi; and
fizičnim osebam, vpletenim v načrtovanje, usmerjanje ali izvedbo dejanj, ki kršijo mednarodno pravo s področja človekovih pravic ali mednarodno humanitarno pravo, kar je ustrezno, ali ki predstavljajo hude kršitve človekovih pravic v Burundiju, in
natural persons associated with those referred to in points (a) and (b);
fizičnim osebam, ki so povezane s tistimi iz točk (a) in (b),
as listed in the Annex.
ki so na seznamu v Prilogi.