natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The limitations on the number of daily return services to EU airports identified on the basis of passenger traffic volume form part of a traffic distribution rule, intended to allocate air services outside the limitations to another airport of the Milan airport system.
Ta sklep je v skladu z mnenjem odbora iz člena 25 Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008.
The Commission approved this traffic distribution rule in 2000.
Odobritev ukrepov, določenih v ministrski uredbi št. 395 z dne 1. oktobra 2014 o spremembi uredbe št. 15 z dne 3. marca 2000 o porazdelitvi zračnega prometa znotraj milanskega letališkega sistema, o kateri je bila Komisija uradno obveščena 21. aprila 2015, se zavrne.
Removing one element of this distribution rule therefore constitutes a change to that rule.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Republiko Italijo.
The Italian authorities have not consulted interested parties before adopting the Lupi Decree.
UL L 293, 31.10.2008, str. 3.
They have therefore failed to comply with the obligation to do so, set out in Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.
Uradni list Italijanske republike (Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana) št. 237 z dne 11. oktobra 2014.
The Italian authorities consider that they did not need to consult interested third parties as Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 would only require to consult interested parties when the Member State intends to ‘regulate’ traffic, i.e. before creating a traffic distribution rule, but not in case of its amendment.
UL L 58, 28.2.2001, str.
The Commission does not agree with this reasoning.
29.
The amendment of a traffic distribution rule means that the rule after the amendment is different from the one applicable before.
Uradni list Italijanske republike (Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana) št. 60 z dne 13. marca 2000.
Having regard to the rationale of Article 19, such (intended) change in the legal situation is not fundamentally different from the change brought about by the introduction of a new rule.
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2408/92 z dne 23. julija 1992 o dostopu letalskih prevoznikov Skupnosti do letalskih prog znotraj Skupnosti (UL L 240, 24.8.1992, str. 8).
This change in legal situation constitutes the very justification for the national authorities' duty to consult interested parties, in the same way as it underpins the authorities' duty to notify the case to the Commission.
Glede te razveljavitve glej člen 27 Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008.
Hence, the term ‘regulate’ in Article 19(2) has to be understood as also comprising the amendment of traffic distribution rules.
Uradni list Italijanske republike (Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana) št. 14 z dne 18. januarja 2001.
The Italian authorities argue that a consultation was not necessary from a substantial point of view as all air carriers holding slots at Linate airport equally benefitted from the Lupi Decree.
UL C 183, 4.6.2015, str.
The Commission notes that this argument anticipates upon the possible conclusions to be drawn in light of the observations interested parties are entitled to make.
4.
By definition, it cannot defeat Italy's obligation to consult interested parties first, before drawing any conclusions.
Sklep Komisije je bil pogojen s spremembo teh pravil, o čemer so jo italijanski organi obvestili z dopisom z dne 4. decembra 2000.
The Italian authorities indicated that they are prepared to carry out a consultation now.
Sprememba je bila uvedena z uredbo ministra za infrastrukturo in promet z dne 5. januarja 2001 [6] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba Bersani 2).
For the sake of clarity, however, it must be underlined that such a consultation would need to be followed by a new act, to be taken in light of the observations submitted.
Uredba Lupi (ministrska uredba št. 395) je bila podpisana 1. oktobra in objavljena 11. oktobra 2014, tik pred začetkom zimskega prometnega obdobja 2014–2015 Mednarodnega združenja letalskih prevoznikov (IATA), ki se je začelo 26. oktobra 2014.
Such new act would be indispensable even if, following the consultation, the Italian authorities were to continue to consider that the rule as amended by the Lupi decree is appropriate.
Uredba Lupi velja od začetka zimskega prometnega obdobja 2014/2015.
CONCLUSION
Komisija je to pravilo o porazdelitvi prometa odobrila leta 2000.
Contrary to Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, the Italian authorities have failed to consult interested parties before amending the traffic distribution rules for the Milan airport system.
Odstranitev enega elementa tega pravila o porazdelitvi zato predstavlja spremembo navedenega pravila.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2416
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/2416
recognising certain areas of the United States of America as being free from Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire
o priznanju nekaterih območij Združenih držav Amerike kot nenapadenih z Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire
(notified under document C(2015) 9185)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2015) 9185)
Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community [1], and in particular points 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 of Section I of Part A of Annex IV thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2000/29/ES z dne 8. maja 2000 o varstvenih ukrepih proti vnosu organizmov, škodljivih za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode, v Skupnost in proti njihovemu širjenju v Skupnosti [1], ter zlasti točk 2.3, 2.4 in 2.5 oddelka I dela A Priloge IV k Direktivi,
Points 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 of Section I of Part A of Annex IV to Directive 2000/29/EC provide for special requirements concerning the introduction into the Union of certain plant products and other objects originating from certain countries.
Točke 2.3, 2.4 in 2.5 oddelka I dela A Priloge IV k Direktivi 2000/29/ES določajo posebne zahteve za vnos v Unijo nekaterih rastlinskih proizvodov in drugih predmetov s poreklom iz nekaterih držav.
One of those special requirements is the requirement of an official statement that those plant products and other objects originate in an area recognised as being free from Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire.
Ena od navedenih posebnih zahtev je zahteva po uradni izjavi, da navedeni rastlinski proizvodi in drugi predmeti izvirajo iz območja, ki je priznano kot nenapadeno z Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire.
The United States of America have requested the recognition of certain areas of their territories as being free from Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire in accordance with points 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 of Section I of Part A of Annex IV of Directive 2000/29/EC.
Združene države Amerike so zahtevale priznanje nekaterih območjih svojega ozemlja kot nenapadenih z Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire v skladu s točkami 2.3, 2.4 in 2.5 oddelka I dela A Priloge IV k Direktivi 2000/29/ES.
It appears from the official information submitted by the United States of America that certain areas of its territory are free from Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire.
Iz uradnih informacij, ki so jih predložile Združene države Amerike, je razvidno, da so nekatera območja njenega ozemlja nenapadena z Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire.
Those areas of the United States of America should therefore be recognized as being free from that harmful organism.
Navedena območja Združenih držav Amerike bi bilo zato treba priznati kot nenapadena z navedenim škodljivim organizmom.
In view of the continued spread of Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire in the United States of America, it is appropriate to limit the recognition of the areas concerned as being free from Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire to a certain period.
Zaradi nadaljnjega širjenja Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire v Združenih državah Amerike je priznanje zadevnih območij kot nenapadenih z Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire primerno omejiti na določeno obdobje.
For the purposes of points 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 of Section I of Part A of Annex IV to Directive 2000/29/EC, the areas of the United States of America listed in the Annex to this Decision are recognised as being free from Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire.
Za namene točk 2.3, 2.4 in 2.5 oddelka I dela A Priloge IV k Direktivi 2000/29/ES se območja Združenih držav Amerike iz Priloge k temu sklepu priznajo kot nenapadena z Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire.
Expiry date
Prenehanje veljavnosti
LIST OF AREAS, AS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1
SEZNAM OBMOČIJ, KOT SO NAVEDENA V ČLENU 1
States being free from Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire
Zvezne države, ki so nenapadene z Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire
Counties being free from Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire
Okrožja, ki so nenapadena z Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire
Counties in Alabama:
Okrožja v Alabami:
Counties in Arkansas:
Okrožja v Arkansasu:
Counties in Colorado:
Okrožja v Koloradu:
Counties in Georgia:
Okrožja v Georgii:
Counties in Kansas:
Okrožja v Kansasu:
Counties (Parishes) in Louisiana:
Okrožja (župnije) v Louisiani:
Counties in Maine:
Okrožja v Maineu:
Counties in Minnesota:
Okrožja v Minnesoti:
Counties in Nebraska:
Okrožja v Nebraski:
Counties in New Hampshire:
Okrožja v New Hampshireu:
Counties in South Carolina:
Okrožja v Južni Karolini:
Counties in Tennessee:
Okrožja v Tennesseeju:
Counties in Texas:
Okrožja v Teksasu:
Counties in Wisconsin:
Okrožja v Wisconsinu:
Counties in Vermont:
Okrožja v Vermontu:
Aiken County
Okrožje Aiken
Allendale County
Okrožje Allendale
Bamberg County
Okrožje Bamberg
Barnwell County
Okrožje Barnwell
Beaufort County
Okrožje Beaufort
Berkeley County
Okrožja Berkeley
Calhoun County
Okrožje Calhoun
Charleston County
Okrožje Charleston
Chesterfield County
Okrožje Chesterfield
Clarendon County
Okrožje Clarendon
Colleton County
Okrožje Colleton
Darlington County
Okrožje Darlington
Dillon County
Okrožje Dillon
Dorchester County
Okrožje Dorchester
Edgefield County
Okrožje Edgefield
Fairfield County
Okrožje Fairfield
Florence County
Okrožje Florence
Georgetown County
Okrožje Georgetown
Greenwood County
Okrožje Greenwood
Hampton County
Okrožje Hampton
Horry County
Okrožje Horry
Jasper County
Okrožje Jasper
Kershaw County
Okrožje Kershaw
Lancaster County
Okrožje Lancaster
Laurens County
Okrožje Laurens
Lee County
Okrožje Lee
Lexington County
Okrožje Lexington
Marion County
Okrožje Marion
Marlboro County
Okrožje Marlboro
McCormick County
Okrožje McCormick
Newberry County
Okrožje Newberry
Orangeburg County
Okrožje Orangeburg
Richland County
Okrožje Richland
Saluda County
Okrožje Saluda
Sumter County
Okrožje Sumter
Williamsburg County
Okrožje Williamsburg
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2417
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/2417
amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 as regards measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.)
o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa (EU) 2015/789 glede ukrepov za preprečevanje vnosa organizma Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) v Unijo in njegovega širjenja znotraj Unije
(notified under document C(2015) 9191)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2015) 9191)
In view of notifications, in the meantime, of new outbreaks of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) (hereinafter ‘the specified organism’) by the French authorities in their respective territories, the measures provided for in that Decision should be adapted to the current situation.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je več gostiteljskih rastlin dovzetnih za samo eno od navedenih podvrst.
Scientific analyses have shown that different subspecies of the specified organism occur in the Union territory.
Zato bi bilo treba spremeniti opredelitev gostiteljskih rastlin, da se upošteva tak razvoj.
Moreover, several host plants have been found to be susceptible to only one of those subspecies.
Iz istega razloga bi bilo prav tako primerno državam članicam ponuditi možnost, da razmejijo območja samo v zvezi z navedenimi podvrstami.
Therefore, the definition of host plants should be amended in order to take into account such developments.
Za zagotovitev bolj pravočasnega uvrščanja na seznam gostiteljskih rastlin, ki so trenutno navedene v Prilogi II k Izvedbenemu sklepu (EU) 2015/789, bi bilo treba spremeniti opredelitev gostiteljskih rastlin, črtati Prilogo II in objaviti seznam gostiteljskih rastlin v podatkovni bazi Komisije za „gostiteljske rastline, dovzetne za organizem Xylella fastidiosa, na ozemlju Unije“.
For the same reason it would also be appropriate to offer the possibility to Member States to demarcate areas only with regard to those subspecies.
Glede na spremembo opredelitve pojma gostiteljskih rastlin bi bilo primerno spremeniti tudi opredelitev pojma zadevnih rastlin za zagotovitev, da zajema vse gostiteljske rastline takoj po njihovi vključitvi v podatkovno bazo iz uvodne izjave 3.
In order to ensure a more timely approach as regards the listing of host plants, which are currently listed in Annex II to Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789, the definition of host plants should be amended, Annex II should be deleted and the list of host plants should be published in a Commission database of ‘host plants susceptible to Xylella fastidiosa in the Union territory’.
Glede na tveganje širjenja zadevnega organizma na katerem koli delu ozemlja Unije ter pomen zgodnjega ukrepanja je izredno pomembna vzpostavitev načrtov izrednih ukrepov na ravni držav članic, da se zagotovi boljša pripravljenost v primeru morebitnih izbruhov.
In view of the amendment of the definition of host plants, it would be appropriate to also amend the definition of specified plants to ensure that they cover all host plants immediately after their inclusion in the database referred to in recital 3.
Da se omogočijo znanstvene raziskave za namene opredelitve natančnih posledic zadevnega organizma na gostiteljskih rastlinah, bi bilo treba zadevnim državam članicam dati možnost, da dovolijo sajenje gostiteljskih rastlin v enem delu ali več delih območja zadrževanja za znanstvene namene v skladu s pogoji iz Direktive Komisije 2008/61/ES [3] in zagotovijo zaščito ozemlja Unije, ki ga zadevni organizem še ni napadel.
Given the risk of the spread of the specified organism in any part of the Union territory, as well as the importance of early action, the setting up of contingency plans at Member State level is of particular importance in order to ensure better preparedness in case of potential outbreaks.
Vendar pa taka možnost ne bi smela obstajati za območje iz člena 7(2)(c) Izvedbenega sklepa (EU) 2015/789 zaradi njegove bližine ostalemu ozemlju Unije.
In order to facilitate scientific research for the purpose of identifying the precise effects of the specified organism on host plants, the Member State concerned should be given the possibility to authorise the planting of host plants in one or more parts of the containment area for scientific purposes, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Commission Directive 2008/61/EC [3], and ensuring the protection of the Union territory not yet affected by the specified organism.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (EFSA) je 2. septembra 2015 objavila znanstveno mnenje [4] o tretiranju sadilnega materiala vinske trte v stadiju mirovanja z vročo vodo proti zadevnemu organizmu.
However, such possibility should not exist for the area referred to in Article 7(2)(c) of Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 due to its proximity to the rest of the Union territory.
Iz navedenega mnenja je razvidno, da pogoji, predpisani in priporočeni za tretiranje sadilnega materiala proti fitoplazmi Grapevine flavescence dorée, učinkujejo tudi proti zadevnemu organizmu.
On 2 September 2015, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has published a scientific opinion [4] on hot water treatment of dormant grapevine planting material against the specified organism.
Zato je primerno, da se pod nekaterimi pogoji dovolijo premestitve rastlin Vitis v stadiju mirovanja znotraj in zunaj razmejenih območij, na katerih so bile navedene rastline tretirane z vročo vodo.
That opinion shows that the conditions prescribed and recommended to sanitize grapevine planting material against Grapevine flavescence dorée phytoplasma, are also effective against the specified organism.
Ob upoštevanju dovzetnosti gostiteljskih rastlin za zadevni organizem ter potrebe po povečanju ozaveščenosti gospodarskih subjektov in sledljivosti v primeru pozitivnih rezultatov je primerno določiti, da se tudi gostiteljske rastline, ki nikoli niso rasle na razmejenih območjih, lahko premestijo znotraj ozemlja Unije samo, če jim je priložen rastlinski potni list.
Therefore it is appropriate to allow, under certain conditions, the movement of dormant plants of Vitis within and out of the demarcated areas where those plants have undergone hot water treatment.
Vendar se z namenom, da se ne uvedejo nesorazmerna upravna bremena za prodajalce navedenih rastlin, ta zahteva ne bi smela uporabljati za premestitve navedenih rastlin osebam, ki delujejo za namene zunaj področij njihove trgovske, poslovne ali poklicne dejavnosti.
Taking into account the susceptibility of the host plants to be infected with the specified organism, as well as the need to enhance awareness of operators and traceability in case of positive findings, it is appropriate to provide that also host plants which have never been grown inside the demarcated areas, may only be moved within the Union territory if accompanied by a plant passport.
Zaradi resnih posledic, ki jih povzroči zadevni organizem, in pomena preprečevanja ali čimprejšnjega ukrepanja za obvladovanje morebitnih izbruhov na ozemlju Unije, bi morale vse države članice dati informacije na voljo najširši javnosti, potnikom, poklicnim in mednarodnim prevoznikom o nevarnosti zadevnega organizma na ozemlju Unije.
However, for the purpose of not introducing disproportionate administrative burdens to sellers of those plants, this requirement should not apply to the movement of those plants to persons acting for purposes which are outside their trade, business or profession.
Francoski organi so Komisijo 27. julija 2015 obvestili o prvem izbruhu zadevnega organizma v korziški regiji.
Given the serious effects caused by the specified organism and the importance of preventing or acting as early as possible in order to control any potential outbreaks in the Union territory, all Member States should make information available to the general public, travellers, professional and international transport operators about the threat of the specified organism for the Union territory.
Zadevni organizem je bil najden na Korziki na rastlinah tistih vrst, ki še niso uvrščene na seznam kot zadevne rastline, zato je primerno posodobiti seznam zadevnih rastlin, da se vključijo navedene vrste.
On 27 July 2015, the French authorities notified to the Commission the first outbreak of the specified organism in the region of Corsica.
Prilogo I k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2015/789/EU bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Since the specified organism has been found in Corsica on plants of species which are not yet listed as specified plants, it is appropriate to update the list of specified plants in order to include those species.
Izvedbeni sklep (EU) 2015/789 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annex I to Implementing Decision 2015/789/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo –
Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 should therefore be amended accordingly.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Spremembe Izvedbenega sklepa (EU) 2015/789
Article 1
Izvedbeni sklep (EU) 2015/789 se spremeni:
Amendments to Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789
V členu 1 se točke (a), (b) in (c) nadomestijo z naslednjim:
Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 is amended as follows:
‚zadevni organizem‘ je katera koli podvrsta organizma Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.);
In Article 1 points (a) (b) and (c) are replaced by the following:
‚gostiteljske rastline‘ so rastline za sajenje, razen semen, ki pripadajo rodovom in vrstam iz podatkovne baze Komisije za gostiteljske rastline, dovzetne za organizem Xylella fastidiosa, na ozemlju Unije, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so dovzetne za zadevni organizem na ozemlju Unije, ali, kadar je država članica razmejila območje v zvezi z eno podvrsto ali več podvrstami zadevnega organizma v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 4(1), za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so dovzetne za zadevno podvrsto ali zadevne podvrste;
“specified organism” means any subspecies of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al);
‚zadevne rastline‘ so gostiteljske rastline in vse rastline za sajenje, razen semen, ki pripadajo rodovom ali vrstam iz Priloge I;“
“host plants” means plants for planting, other than seeds, belonging to the genera and species listed in the Commission database of host plants susceptible to Xylella fastidiosa in the Union territory, as having been found to be susceptible in the Union territory to the specified organism or, where a Member State has demarcated an area with regard to only one or more subspecies of the specified organism pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 4(1), as having been found to be susceptible to that or those subspecies;
Vstavi se naslednji člen 3a:
“specified plants” means host plants and all plants for planting, other than seeds, belonging to the genera or species listed in Annex I;’
„Člen 3a
The following Article 3a is inserted:
Načrt izrednih ukrepov
‘Article 3a
Vsaka država članica do 31. decembra 2016 pripravi načrt, v katerem določi ukrepe, ki se v skladu s členi 4 do 6a in členi 9 do 13a sprejmejo na njenem ozemlju v primeru potrjene navzočnosti ali suma navzočnosti zadevnega organizma (v nadaljnjem besedilu: načrt izrednih ukrepov).
Contingency plans
V načrtu izrednih ukrepov je določeno tudi naslednje:
By 31 December 2016, each Member State shall establish a plan setting out the actions to be taken in its territory in accordance with Articles 4 to 6a, and Articles 9 to 13a, in case of a confirmed or suspected presence of the specified organism (hereinafter “the contingency plan”).
vloge in odgovornosti organov, vključenih v navedene ukrepe, in enotnega organa;
The contingency plan shall also set out the following:
en ali več laboratorijev, posebej odobrenih za testiranje zadevnega organizma;
the roles and responsibilities of the bodies involved in those actions and the single authority;
pravila glede obveščanja o navedenih ukrepih med zadevnimi organi, enotnim organom, zadevnimi poklicnimi izvajalci dejavnosti in javnostjo;
one or more laboratories specifically approved for the testing of the specified organism;
protokoli, ki opisujejo metode vizualnih pregledov, vzorčenja in laboratorijskih testov;
rules on the communication of those actions between the bodies involved, the single authority, the professional operators concerned and the public;
pravila glede usposabljanja osebja organov, vključenih v navedene ukrepe;
protocols describing the methods of visual examinations, sampling and laboratory testing;
minimalna sredstva, ki se dajo na voljo, in postopki, s katerimi se dajo na voljo dodatna sredstva v primeru potrjene navzočnosti ali suma navzočnosti zadevnega organizma.
rules on training of personnel of the bodies involved in those actions;
Države članice ocenijo in po potrebi revidirajo svoje načrte izrednih ukrepov.
minimum resources to be made available and proceedings to make available additional resources in case of a confirmed or suspected presence of the specified organism.
Države članice Komisiji na njeno zahtevo predložijo načrte izrednih ukrepov.“
Member States shall evaluate and review their contingency plans as necessary.
Člen 4(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Member States shall communicate their contingency plans to the Commission at its request.’
Kadar je navzočnost zadevnega organizma potrjena, zadevna država članica nemudoma razmeji območje v skladu z odstavkom 2 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: razmejeno območje).
Article 4(1) is replaced by the following:
Kadar je potrjena navzočnost ene ali več posameznih podvrst zadevnega organizma, lahko zadevna država članica z odstopanjem od prvega pododstavka razmeji območje samo v zvezi z navedeno podvrsto ali navedenimi podvrstami.“