natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The entry of the surrender shall be made on expiry of the three-month period after the date on which the proprietor satisfies the Office that he has informed the licensee of his intention to surrender, or before the expiry of that period, as soon as he proves that the licensee has given his consent.’;
Če je licenca vpisana v register, se odpoved v register vpiše le, če imetnik blagovne znamke EU dokaže, da je pridobitelja licence obvestil o svoji nameri o odpovedi.
If the requirements governing surrender are not fulfilled, the Office shall communicate the deficiencies to the declarant.
Vpis odpovedi se opravi tri mesece po datumu, na katerega imetnik Uradu dokaže, da je pridobitelja licence obvestil o nameri o odpovedi, ali pred iztekom tega roka, če prijavitelj dokaže, da pridobitelj licence soglaša z odpovedjo.“;
If the deficiencies are not remedied within a period to be specified by the Office, the Office shall reject the entry of surrender in the Register.
Če zahteve za odpoved niso izpolnjene, Urad vložnika izjave obvesti o pomanjkljivostih.
The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the details to be contained in a declaration of surrender pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article and the kind of documentation required to establish a third party's agreement pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article.
Če pomanjkljivosti niso odpravljene v roku, ki ga določi Urad, ta zavrne vpis odpovedi v register.
In Article 53, paragraph 1 is amended as follows:
Komisija sprejme izvedbene akte, ki določajo podrobnosti, ki jih mora vsebovati izjava o odpovedi v skladu z odstavkom 2 tega člena, in vrsto dokumentacije, potrebne za pridobitev soglasja tretje osebe v skladu z odstavkom 3 tega člena.
the following point is added:
v členu 53 se odstavek 1 spremeni:
where there is an earlier designation of origin or geographical indication as referred to in Article 8(4a) and the conditions set out in that paragraph are fulfilled.’;
doda se naslednja točka:
the following subparagraph is added:
če obstaja prejšnja označba porekla oziroma prejšnja geografska označba iz člena 8(4a) in so izpolnjeni pogoji iz navedenega odstavka.“;
‘All the conditions referred to in the first subparagraph shall be fulfilled at the filing date or the priority date of the EU trade mark.’.
doda se naslednji pododstavek:
In Article 54, paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following:
„Vsi pogoji iz prvega pododstavka morajo biti izpolnjeni na datum vložitve ali datum prednostne pravice blagovne znamke EU.“;
Where the proprietor of an EU trade mark has acquiesced, for a period of five successive years, in the use of a later EU trade mark in the Union while being aware of such use, he shall no longer be entitled on the basis of the earlier trade mark to apply for a declaration that the later trade mark is invalid in respect of the goods or services for which the later trade mark has been used, unless registration of the later EU trade mark was applied for in bad faith.
v členu 54 se odstavka 1 in 2 nadomestita z naslednjim:
Where the proprietor of an earlier national trade mark as referred to in Article 8(2) or of another earlier sign referred to in Article 8(4) has acquiesced, for a period of five successive years, in the use of a later EU trade mark in the Member State in which the earlier trade mark or the other earlier sign is protected while being aware of such use, he shall no longer be entitled on the basis of the earlier trade mark or of the other earlier sign to apply for a declaration that the later trade mark is invalid in respect of the goods or services for which the later trade mark has been used, unless registration of the later EU trade mark was applied for in bad faith.’.
Če je imetnik blagovne znamke EU za obdobje petih zaporednih let privolil v uporabo poznejše blagovne znamke EU v Uniji in se ob tem zavedal takšne uporabe, ni več upravičen, da na podlagi prejšnje blagovne znamke zahteva ugotovitev ničnosti poznejše blagovne znamke za blago ali storitve, za katere se uporablja poznejša blagovna znamka, razen če je bila prijava za registracijo poznejše blagovne znamke EU vložena v slabi veri.
Article 56 is amended as follows:
Če je imetnik prejšnje nacionalne blagovne znamke iz člena 8(2) ali drugega prejšnjega znaka iz člena 8(4) za obdobje petih zaporednih let privolil v uporabo poznejše blagovne znamke EU v državi članici, v kateri je prejšnja blagovna znamka ali drug znak zaščiten, in se ob tem zavedal takšne uporabe, ni več upravičen, da na podlagi prejšnje blagovne znamke ali prejšnjega znaka zahteva ugotovitev ničnosti poznejše blagovne znamke za blago ali storitve, za katere se uporablja poznejša blagovna znamka, razen če je bila prijava za registracijo poznejše blagovne znamke EU vložena v slabi veri.“;
in paragraph 1, point (c), the phrase ‘under the law of the Member State concerned’ is replaced by the phrase ‘under Union legislation or the law of the Member State concerned’;
člen 56 se spremeni:
An application for revocation or for a declaration of invalidity shall be inadmissible where an application relating to the same subject matter and cause of action, and involving the same parties, has been adjudicated on its merits, either by the Office or by an EU trade mark court as referred to in Article 95, and the decision of the Office or that court on that application has acquired the authority of a final decision.’.
v odstavku 1(c) se besedilo „po pravu zadevne države članice“ nadomesti z besedilom „v skladu z zakonodajo Unije ali pravom zadevne države članice“;
In Article 57, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
Zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti ni dopustna, če je Urad ali sodišče za blagovne znamke EU iz člena 95 že vsebinsko odločilo o zahtevi, ki se nanaša na isti predmet in pravno podlago ter vključuje iste stranke, odločba Urada ali navedenega sodišča o tej zahtevi pa je postala pravnomočna.“;
If the proprietor of the EU trade mark so requests, the proprietor of an earlier EU trade mark, being a party to the invalidity proceedings, shall furnish proof that, during the period of five years preceding the date of the application for a declaration of invalidity, the earlier EU trade mark has been put to genuine use in the Union in connection with the goods or services in respect of which it is registered and which the proprietor of that earlier trade mark cites as justification for his application, or that there are proper reasons for non-use, provided the earlier EU trade mark has at that date been registered for not less than five years.
v členu 57 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
If, at the date on which the EU trade mark application was filed or at the priority date of the EU trade mark application, the earlier EU trade mark had been registered for not less than five years, the proprietor of the earlier EU trade mark shall furnish proof that, in addition, the conditions set out in Article 42(2) were satisfied at that date.
Če imetnik blagovne znamke EU to zahteva, imetnik prejšnje blagovne znamke EU, ki je stranka v postopku za ugotavljanje ničnosti, priskrbi dokaz, da je v obdobju petih let pred datumom vložitve zahteve za ugotovitev ničnosti prejšnjo blagovno znamko EU resno in dejansko uporabljal v Uniji za blago ali storitve, za katere je registrirana in ki jih imetnik te prejšnje blagovne znamke navaja kot razlog za svojo zahtevo, ali da obstajajo upravičeni razlogi za neuporabo, če je bila na ta datum prejšnja blagovna znamka EU registrirana najmanj pet let.
In the absence of proof to this effect, the application for a declaration of invalidity shall be rejected.
Če je bila na datum vložitve prijave blagovne znamke EU ali na datum prijave za prednostno pravico blagovne znamke EU prejšnja blagovna znamka EU registrirana najmanj pet let, imetnik prejšnje blagovne znamke EU priskrbi dokaz, da so bili pogoji iz člena 42(2) na ta datum izpolnjeni.
If the earlier EU trade mark has been used only in relation to part of the goods or services for which it is registered, it shall, for the purpose of the examination of the application for a declaration of invalidity, be deemed to be registered in respect of that part of the goods or services only.’.
Če takega dokaza ni, se zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti zavrne.
‘Article 57a
Če je bila prejšnja blagovna znamka EU uporabljena samo za del blaga ali storitev, za katere je registrirana, za namene preizkusa zahteve za ugotovitev ničnosti velja, da je bila registrirana le za ta del blaga ali storitev.“;
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 163a specifying the details of the procedures governing the revocation and declaration of invalidity of an EU trade mark as referred to in Articles 56 and 57, as well as the transfer of an EU trade mark registered in the name of an agent as referred to in Article 18.’.
„Člen 57a
In Article 58, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
Na Komisijo se prenese pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 163a, ki določajo podrobnosti o postopkih za razveljavitev in ugotovitev ničnosti blagovne znamke EU iz členov 56 in 57 ter o prenosu blagovne znamke EU, registrirane v imenu posrednika, iz člena 18.“;
An appeal shall lie from decisions of any of the decision-making instances of the Office listed in points (a) to (d) of Article 130, and, where appropriate, point (f) of that Article.
v členu 58 se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Those decisions shall take effect only as from the date of expiration of the appeal period referred to in Article 60.
Pritožba se lahko vloži zoper odločbo katerega koli organa Urada, pristojnega za odločanje, ki je naveden v točkah (a) do (d) člena 130 ter, kadar je primerno, v točki (f) navedenega člena.
The filing of the appeal shall have suspensive effect.’.
Te odločbe začnejo učinkovati šele na dan izteka pritožbenega roka iz člena 60.
Article 60 is replaced by the following:
Vložitev pritožbe zadrži izvršitev.“;
‘Article 60
člen 60 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Time limit and form of appeal
„Člen 60
Notice of appeal shall be filed in writing at the Office within two months of the date of notification of the decision.
Rok in oblika pritožbe
The notice shall be deemed to have been filed only when the fee for appeal has been paid.
Pritožba se pisno vloži na Uradu v dveh mesecih od dneva vročitve odločbe.
It shall be filed in the language of the proceedings in which the decision subject to appeal was taken.
Pritožba velja za vloženo šele po plačilu pristojbine za pritožbo.
Within four months of the date of notification of the decision, a written statement setting out the grounds of appeal shall be filed.
Vloži se v jeziku postopka, v katerem je bila sprejeta odločba, ki je predmet pritožbe.
In inter partes proceedings, the defendant may, in his response, seek a decision annulling or altering the contested decision on a point not raised in the appeal.
V štirih mesecih od dneva vročitve odločbe se vloži pisna izjava, v kateri so navedeni vzroki za pritožbo.
Such submissions shall cease to have effect should the appellant discontinue the proceedings.’.
V postopkih inter partes lahko tožena stranka v svojem odgovoru zahteva odločitev o razveljavitvi ali spremembi izpodbijane odločbe v točki, ki v pritožbi ni izpostavljena.
Article 62 is deleted.
Takšne zahteve postanejo brezpredmetne, če pritožnik prekine postopek.“;
In Article 64, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
člen 62 se črta;
The decisions of the Board of Appeal shall take effect only as from the date of expiry of the period referred to in Article 65(5) or, if an action has been brought before the General Court within that period, as from the date of dismissal of such action or of any appeal filed with the Court of Justice against the decision of the General Court.’.
v členu 64 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 65 is amended as follows:
Odločbe odbora za pritožbe začnejo učinkovati šele od dneva, ko poteče rok iz člena 65(5), ali – če je bila v tem roku vložena tožba pred Splošnim sodiščem – od dneva zavrnitve te tožbe ali katere koli pritožbe, vložene pri Sodišču zoper odločbo Splošnega sodišča.“;
Actions may be brought before the General Court against decisions of the Boards of Appeal in relation to appeals.’;
člen 65 se spremeni:
The General Court shall have jurisdiction to annul or to alter the contested decision.’;
Proti odločbam odborov za pritožbe glede pritožb se lahko vloži tožba pred Splošnim sodiščem.“;
paragraphs 5 and 6 are replaced by the following:
Splošno sodišče je pristojno za razveljavitev ali spremembo izpodbijane odločbe.“;
The action shall be brought before the General Court within two months of the date of notification of the decision of the Board of Appeal.
odstavka 5 in 6 se nadomestita z naslednjim:
The Office shall take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the General Court or, in the event of an appeal against that judgment, the Court of Justice.’.
Tožba se na Splošnem sodišču vloži v dveh mesecih od dneva vročitve odločbe odbora za pritožbe.
‘Article 65a
Urad stori vse potrebno, da upošteva sodbo Splošnega sodišča ali – v primeru pritožbe zoper to sodbo – sodbo Sodišča.“;
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 163a specifying:
„Člen 65a
the formal content of the notice of appeal referred to in Article 60 and the procedure for the filing and the examination of an appeal;
Na Komisijo se prenese pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 163a, ki določajo:
the formal content and form of the Board of Appeal's decisions as referred to in Article 64;
formalno vsebino obvestila o pritožbi iz člena 60 in postopek za vložitev in preizkus pritožbe;
the reimbursement of the appeal fee as referred to in Article 60.’.
formalno vsebino in obliko odločb odbora za pritožbe iz člena 64;
The title of Title VIII is replaced by the following:
povračilo pristojbine za pritožbo iz člena 60.“;
‘SPECIFIC PROVISIONS ON EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE MARKS AND CERTIFICATION MARKS’.
naslov naslova VIII se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The following section heading is inserted before Article 66:
„POSEBNE DOLOČBE O KOLEKTIVNIH IN CERTIFIKACIJSKIH ZNAMKAH EU“;
‘SECTION 1
pred členom 66 se vstavi naslednji naslov oddelka:
EU collective marks’.
„ODDELEK 1
In Article 66, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
Kolektivne znamke EU“;
Titles I to VII and IX to XIV shall apply to EU collective marks to the extent that this section does not provide otherwise.’.
člen 66(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 67 is amended as follows:
Če v tem oddelku ni določeno drugače, se za kolektivne znamke EU uporabljajo naslovi I do VII in IX do XIV.“;
An applicant for an EU collective mark shall submit regulations governing its use within two months of the date of filing.’;
člen 67 se spremeni:
The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the details to be contained in the regulations referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article.
Prijavitelj kolektivne znamke EU v dveh mesecih po datumu vložitve predloži pravilnik, ki ureja njeno uporabo.“;
Article 69 is replaced by the following:
Komisija sprejme izvedbene akte, ki določajo podrobnosti, ki jih mora vsebovati pravilnik iz odstavka 2 tega člena.
‘Article 69
člen 69 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Where written observations on an EU collective mark are submitted to the Office pursuant to Article 40, those observations may also be based on the particular grounds on which the application for an EU collective mark should be refused pursuant to Article 68.’.
„Člen 69
In Article 71, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
Če se Uradu v skladu s členom 40 predložijo pisne pripombe o kolektivni znamki EU, lahko te pripombe temeljijo tudi na posebnih razlogih, zaradi katerih bi bilo treba na podlagi člena 68 zavrniti prijavo kolektivne znamke EU.“;
Written observations made in accordance with Article 69 may also be submitted with regard to amended regulations governing use.’.
v členu 71 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z naslednjim:
In Title VIII, the following section is added:
Pisne pripombe v skladu s členom 69 se lahko predložijo tudi v zvezi s spremenjenim pravilnikom o uporabi.“;
‘SECTION 2
v naslovu VIII se doda naslednji oddelek:
EU certification marks
„ODDELEK 2
Article 74a
Certifikacijske znamke EU
An EU certification mark shall be an EU trade mark which is described as such when the mark is applied for and is capable of distinguishing goods or services which are certified by the proprietor of the mark in respect of material, mode of manufacture of goods or performance of services, quality, accuracy or other characteristics, with the exception of geographical origin, from goods and services which are not so certified.
Člen 74a
Any natural or legal person, including institutions, authorities and bodies governed by public law, may apply for EU certification marks provided that such person does not carry on a business involving the supply of goods or services of the kind certified.
Certifikacijska znamka EU je blagovna znamka EU, ki je kot takšna opisana ob vložitvi prijave za znamko in omogoča razlikovanje med blagom ali storitvami, ki jih je imetnik znamke certificiral na podlagi materiala, načina proizvodnje blaga ali opravljanja storitev, kakovosti, natančnosti ali drugih značilnosti z izjemo geografskega porekla, na eni strani ter blagom in storitvami, ki niso certificirani, na drugi strani.
Titles I to VII and IX to XIV shall apply to EU certification marks to the extent that this Section does not provide otherwise.
Vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba, tudi ustanove, telesa in organi javnega prava, lahko prijavi certifikacijsko znamko EU, če ne opravlja dejavnosti, ki vključujejo dobavo iste vrste blaga ali storitev, kot so certificirani.
Article 74b
Če v tem oddelku ni določeno drugače, se za certifikacijske znamke EU uporabljajo naslovi I do VII in IX do XIV.
Regulations governing use of the EU certification mark
Člen 74b
An applicant for an EU certification mark shall submit regulations governing the use of the certification mark within two months of the date of filing.
Pravilnik o uporabi certifikacijske znamke EU
The regulations governing use shall specify the persons authorised to use the mark, the characteristics to be certified by the mark, how the certifying body is to test those characteristics and to supervise the use of the mark.
Prijavitelj certifikacijske znamke EU v dveh mesecih po vložitvi predloži pravilnik o uporabi certifikacijske znamke.
Those regulations shall also specify the conditions of use of the mark, including sanctions.
V pravilniku o uporabi znamke se navedejo osebe, ki smejo uporabljati znamko, lastnosti, ki jih znamka certificira, način, na katerega bo certifikacijski organ preverjal navedene lastnosti in nadziral uporabo znamke.
Article 74c
V tem pravilniku se navedejo tudi pogoji za uporabo znamke, vključno s sankcijami.
Refusal of the application
Člen 74c
In addition to the grounds for refusal of an EU trade mark application provided for in Articles 36 and 37, an application for an EU certification mark shall be refused where the conditions set out in Articles 74a and 74b are not satisfied, or where the regulations governing use are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality.
Zavrnitev prijave
An application for an EU certification mark shall also be refused if the public is liable to be misled as regards the character or the significance of the mark, in particular if it is likely to be taken to be something other than a certification mark.
Poleg razlogov za zavrnitev prijave blagovne znamke EU iz členov 36 in 37 se prijava certifikacijske znamke EU zavrne, če niso izpolnjeni pogoji iz členov 74a in 74b ali če je pravilnik o uporabi znamke v nasprotju z javnim redom ali sprejetimi moralnimi načeli.
An application shall not be refused if the applicant, as a result of an amendment of the regulations governing use, meets the requirements of paragraphs 1 and 2.
Prijava certifikacijske znamke EU se zavrne tudi, če bi ta lahko zavajala javnost glede svojega značaja ali pomena, zlasti če je verjetno, da bi bila sprejeta kot nekaj drugega kot certifikacijska znamka.
Article 74d
Prijava se ne zavrne, če prijavitelj s spremembo pravilnika o uporabi znamke izpolnjuje zahteve iz odstavkov 1 in 2.
Where written observations on an EU certification mark are submitted to the Office pursuant to Article 40, those observations may also be based on the particular grounds on which the application for an EU certification mark should be refused pursuant to Article 74c.
Člen 74d
Article 74e
Če se Uradu v skladu s členom 40 predložijo pisne pripombe o certifikacijski znamki EU, se lahko te pripombe nanašajo tudi na posebne razloge, zaradi katerih bi bilo treba na podlagi člena 74c zavrniti prijavo certifikacijske znamke EU.
Use of the EU certification mark
Člen 74e
Use of an EU certification mark by any person who has authority to use it according to the regulations governing use referred to in Article 74b shall satisfy the requirements of this Regulation, provided that the other conditions laid down in this Regulation with regard to the use of EU trade marks are fulfilled.
Uporaba certifikacijske znamke EU
Article 74f
Katera koli oseba, ki sme v skladu s pravilnikom o uporabi znamke iz člena 74b uporabljati certifikacijsko znamko EU, jo uporablja v skladu z zahtevami te uredbe, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjeni tudi drugi pogoji iz te uredbe, ki se nanašajo na uporabo blagovnih znamk EU.
Amendment of the regulations governing use of the mark
Člen 74f
The proprietor of an EU certification mark shall submit to the Office any amended regulations governing use.
Sprememba pravilnika o uporabi blagovne znamke
Amendments shall not be mentioned in the Register where the regulations as amended do not satisfy the requirements of Article 74b or involve one of the grounds for refusal referred to in Article 74c.
Imetnik certifikacijske znamke EU Uradu predloži vse spremembe pravilnika o uporabi znamke.
Written observations in accordance with Article 74d may also be submitted with regard to amended regulations governing use.
Če pravilnik, kot je spremenjen, ne izpolnjuje zahtev člena 74b ali če obstaja eden od razlogov za zavrnitev iz člena 74c, se sprememba ne vpiše v register.
For the purposes of this Regulation, amendments to the regulations governing use shall take effect only as from the date of entry of the mention of the amendment in the Register.
Pisne pripombe v skladu s členom 74d se lahko predložijo tudi v zvezi s spremenjenim pravilnikom o uporabi znamke.
Article 74g
Za namene te uredbe začnejo spremembe pravilnika o uporabi znamke učinkovati šele z datumom vpisa spremembe v register.
Transfer
Člen 74g
By way of derogation from Article 17(1), an EU certification mark may only be transferred to a person who meets the requirements of Article 74a(2).
Prenos
Article 74h
Z odstopanjem od člena 17(1) se lahko certifikacijska znamka EU prenese le na osebo, ki izpolnjuje zahteve člena 74a(2).
Persons who are entitled to bring an action for infringement
Člen 74h
Only the proprietor of an EU certification mark, or any person specifically authorised by him to that effect, shall be entitled to bring an action for infringement.
Osebe, upravičene do vložitve tožbe zaradi kršitve
The proprietor of an EU certification mark shall be entitled to claim compensation on behalf of persons who have authority to use the mark where they have sustained damage as a consequence of unauthorised use of the mark.
Tožbo zaradi kršitve lahko vloži samo imetnik certifikacijske znamke EU ali druga oseba, ki jo imetnik za to posebej pooblasti.
Article 74i
Imetnik certifikacijske znamke EU ima pravico, da v imenu oseb, ki smejo uporabljati znamko, zahteva nadomestilo, če so zaradi nedovoljene uporabe znamke utrpele škodo.
Grounds for revocation
Člen 74i
In addition to the grounds for revocation provided for in Article 51, the rights of the proprietor of an EU certification mark shall be revoked on application to the Office or on the basis of a counterclaim in infringement proceedings, where any of the following conditions is fulfilled:
Razlogi za razveljavitev