natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These import statistics show that with regard to the period from 2009 to 2014, the year 2012 was the only exception in otherwise increasing volumes of imports from the countries concerned.
Interes industrije Unije
Decreasing sales and production despite increasing orders
Kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah od 210 do 212 začasne uredbe, večina proizvajalcev industrije Unije podpira uvedbo ukrepov, največji proizvajalec Unije (Outokumpu) pa se ni javil.
One interested party claimed that the low production and sales volumes of the Union industry are decreasing despite increasing order volumes.
Poleg tega se je po objavi začasne uredbe javil en proizvajalec natančnih trakov kot zadevnega izdelka in podprl ukrepe.
Indeed, the information in the complaint suggests that the order volume exceeds the sales volume by a significant margin.
Interes nepovezanih uvoznikov in distributerjev
However, these two figures are not directly comparable, as they are not reported on the same basis.
Da bi Komisija podrobno ocenila veljavnost predloženih trditev, je, kot je bilo že navedeno v uvodni izjavi 7 zgoraj, opravila preveritvene obiske v prostorih treh uvoznikov ter dveh uporabnikov (v Italiji in na Poljskem).
Following provisional disclosure, the Union industry submitted additional information about the comparability of these figures in reaction to this claim.
Kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah od 213 do 217 začasne uredbe, so bili v tej zadevi nepovezani uvozniki in distributerji zelo dejavni ter so na splošno nasprotovali ukrepom.
When comparing the information on orders and sales on a comparable basis, this difference is indeed negligible.
Ena zainteresirana stran je navedla pripombe o razlikah v kakovosti.
Conclusion on causation
Trdila je, da kakovosti hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla, ki jo ponujajo indijski in ameriški proizvajalci, ni mogoče primerjati s proizvodnjo industrije Unije ali uvozom iz LRK in Tajvana, saj ni na enaki standardni ravni.
In the absence of other comments regarding causation, the other conclusions reached in recitals 156 to 208 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ta trditev ni bila utemeljena.
UNION INTEREST
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 101 začasne uredbe, proizvajalci na splošno izpolnjujejo enake svetovne standarde in zagotovljen ni bil noben dokaz, da to ne velja tudi za indijske ali ameriške proizvajalce.
As set out in recital 209 of the provisional Regulation, in accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether it could clearly conclude that it was not in the Union interest to adopt measures in this case, despite the determination of injurious dumping.
Interes uporabnikov
Interest of the Union industry
Številni proizvajalci izvozniki in distributerji so ponovili pomisleke glede možnih negativnih učinkov ukrepov na uporabnike.
As described in recitals 210 to 212 of the provisional Regulation, the majority of the Union industry supports the imposition of measures with the largest Union producer (Outokumpu) that continued to remain silent.
Uporabniki pa se niso strinjali s temi pomisleki in stopnja njihove udeležbe v tej zadevi je bila še vedno zelo nizka.
In addition, one producer of precision strips, as product concerned, came forward in support of the measures after the publication of the provisional Regulation.
Interesi drugih strani
Interest of unrelated importers and distributors
Te ukrepe je podprl nemški sindikat na področju kovinarstva (IG Metall).
As already set out in recital 7 above, in order to assess the validity of the claims brought forward in detail, the Commission conducted verification visits at premises of three importers and two users, in Italy and Poland.
Izrazil je pomisleke glede negativnega učinka dampinškega uvoza na položaj industrije Unije.
As described in recitals 213 to 217 of the provisional Regulation, unrelated importers and distributors were very active in the present case, generally opposing the measures.
Ta sindikat zastopa tudi delavce v pomembnih uporabniških industrijah, kot sta avtomobilska industrija in industrija gospodinjskih aparatov.
One interested party commented on quality differences.
Sklep o interesu Unije
It claimed that the quality offered by Indian and USA SSCR producers is not of the same standard level when comparing with the production of the Union industry or with imports from the PRC and Taiwan.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z interesom Unije, se potrdijo sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 209 do 222 začasne uredbe.
This claim was not substantiated.
RETROAKTIVNOST
As set out in recital 101 of the provisional Regulation, producers generally comply with the same worldwide standards, and no evidence that this is not the case for Indian or USA producers was provided.
Glede morebitne retroaktivne uporabe protidampinških ukrepov je treba ovrednotiti pogoje iz člena 10(4) osnovne uredbe.
Interest of users
V skladu s členom 10(4)(b) mora biti izpolnjen bistven pogoj, da „poleg ravni uvoza, ki je povzročal škodo v teku obdobja preiskave, obstaja nadaljnja znatna rast uvoza“.
A number of exporting producers and distributors repeated concerns regarding possible negative effects of measures on users.
Primerjava mesečnega povprečnega uvoza [8] hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla z mesečnim povprečnim uvozom v obdobju registracije (od 17. decembra 2014 do 25. marca 2015) kaže, da se je obseg uvoza v obdobju registracije zmanjšal.
However, users themselves did not share these concerns and the degree of participation of users in this case remained very low.
Kot je navedeno v preglednici 6 začasne uredbe, je povprečni mesečni obseg uvoza hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla iz zadevnih držav v obdobju preiskave dejansko znašal 26043 ton [9].
Interest of other parties
Za primerjavo – v obdobju registracije je povprečni mesečni obseg uvoza hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla iz zadevnih držav znašal približno 22000 ton, kar je približno 15 % manj.
Lastly, the German metalworking trade union (IG Metall) came forward in support of the measures.
Zaradi zaupnosti znova ni bil izključen zanemarljiv uvoz tajvanskega proizvajalca izvoznika, za katerega se je ugotovilo, da ni dampinški.
They expressed concerns about the negative impact of the dumped imports on the state of the Union industry.
Torej ni izpolnjeno merilo nadaljnje znatne rasti uvoza.
This trade union also represents workers in important user industries such as automotive and white goods.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se dokončna protidampinška dajatev ne obračuna retroaktivno za obdobje pred datumom začetka uporabe začasnih ukrepov.
Conclusion on Union interest
Po dokončnem razkritju je zainteresirana stran zahtevala retroaktivno pobiranje dajatev in trdila, da je Komisija pri odločanju o tem, ali uvesti ukrepe retroaktivno, proučila napačno obdobje.
In the absence of other comments regarding Union interest, the conclusions reached in recitals 209 to 222 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Po njenih trditvah bi bilo treba pri določanju, ali obstaja nadaljnja znatna rast uvoza, proučiti gibanje uvoza v celotnem obdobju po obdobju preiskave.
RETROACTIVITY
V zvezi s tem je navedla rast uvoza med februarjem in decembrom 2014, kar pomeni, da se je začela pred začetkom preiskave in končala približno dva tedna po začetku registracije uvoza.
As concerns a possible retroactive application of anti-dumping measures, the criteria set out in Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation have to be evaluated.
Dejansko je iz gibanja uvoza v navedenem obdobju razvidna rast, vendar zaradi takega povečanja ni bilo verjetno, da bi se popravljalni učinki ukrepov, ki naj bi bili uvedeni s 26. marcem 2015, resno oslabili, če se s 17. decembrom 2014 ne bi uvedli nadaljnji ukrepi.
Pursuant to Article 10(4)(b), one key criterion which needs to be fulfilled is that there is ‘a further substantial rise in imports’ ‘in addition to the level of imports which caused injury during the investigation period’.
Tako je zato, ker je bil po juliju 2014 (malo po začetku preiskave) in celo še bolj po decembru 2014 (začetek registracije) iz razvoja uvoza razviden trend zmanjševanja, ki je dosegel ravni uvoza, enake tistim v obdobju preiskave in celo nižje, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 154 zgoraj.
A comparison of monthly average imports [8] of SSCR during the investigation period with monthly average imports for the period under registration (17 December 2014-25 March 2015) shows a decrease of import volumes for the period under registration.
Za obdobje, za katero stran zahteva retroaktivno pobiranje dajatev (tj. obdobje, omejeno na 90 dni pred uvedbo začasnih ukrepov, od 26. decembra 2014 do 25. marca 2015), za razvoj uvoza vsekakor ni bila značilna rast, temveč zmanjšanje, zato takemu uvozu ni mogoče pripisati učinka oslabitve.
Indeed, as stated in Table 6 of the provisional Regulation, the monthly average import quantity of SSCR from the countries concerned amounted to 26043 tonnes [9] during the investigation.
Komisija je na tej podlagi menila, da niso izpolnjeni pravni pogoji za uporabo njenih diskrecijskih pooblastil v skladu s členom 10(4) osnovne uredbe.
For comparison, during the period of registration the monthly average import volume of SSCR from the countries concerned was around 22000 tonnes or around 15 % lower.
DOKONČNI PROTIDAMPINŠKI UKREPI
Again, for confidentiality reasons the negligible imports from the Taiwanese exporting producer found not to be dumping have not been excluded.
Glede na sklepe v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročno zvezo in interesom Unije ter v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe bi bilo treba uvesti dokončne protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz hladno valjanih ploščatih izdelkov iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz LRK in Tajvana v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve iz člena 7(2) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, the criterion concerning a further substantial rise in imports is not met.
Stopnja odprave škode
As a consequence, it is concluded that the definitive anti-dumping duty shall not be levied retroactively prior to the date of application of provisional measures.
Zainteresirane strani so trdile, da ciljni dobiček ne bi smel temeljiti na letu 2007, saj naj bi bilo to leto izjemno dobro leto za jeklarsko industrijo.
Following final disclosure, an interested party requested retroactive collection of the duty and argued that the Commission considered an incorrect period in determining whether to retroactively impose measures.
Informacije, ki jih je imela Komisija na voljo, pa so pokazale, da je bil v obdobju med letoma 2004 in 2007 v letu 2007 dejansko dosežen tretji najboljši rezultat glede dobičkonosnosti industrije.
The party claimed that the development of imports in the entire period after the investigation period should be considered when determining whether there is a further substantial rise in imports.
Ena zainteresirana stran je tudi trdila, da je bilo leto 2007 resnično izjemno, saj so ga sestavljala četrtletja z zelo različnimi rezultati.
The party puts forward an increase of imports between February and December 2014, that is to say starting before the initiation of the investigation and ending around two weeks after the beginning of the registration of imports.
Dejansko je bila industrija v prvih dveh četrtletjih leta 2007 zelo uspešna, saj je dosegla več kot 10-odstotno stopnjo dobička.
Indeed the evolution of imports showed a rise in that period, however, such an increase did not create likelihood that the remedial effects of the measures to be imposed as of 26 March 2015 would be seriously undermined if further measures are not imposed as of 17 December 2014.
V drugih dveh četrtletjih pa je bilo stanje drugačno, saj je bila stopnja dobička le tik nad pragom dobička ali celo negativna.
This is so because after July 2014 (shortly after the initiation of the investigation) and even more so after December 2014 (the beginning of the registration) the evolution of imports showed a decreasing trend, reaching import levels as those during the investigation period and even lower as observed in recital 154 above.
Čeprav je tak razvoj vsekakor izjemen, pa prav tako kaže, da celotno povprečje za leto 2007 ne more biti izjemno visoko, saj obsega dve uspešni in dve manj uspešni četrtletji industrije Unije.
For the period for which the party requests retroactive application of duties (a period limited to 90 days before the imposition of provisional measures, that is to say 26 December 2014-25 March 2015), the evolution of imports is certainly not characterised by an increase but by a decrease and therefore no undermining effect could be attributed to such imports.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran trdila, da je ciljni dobiček primerljivo višji od dobička v drugih preiskavah v zvezi z izdelki iz jekla, kot so varjene cevi [10] in zrnato usmerjeni ploščato valjani izdelki iz silicijevega jekla za elektropločevine [11].
On this basis, the Commission considered that the legal conditions for using its discretionary powers under Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation were not met.
Vendar ta stran ni utemeljila, zakaj so informacije v zvezi z industrijo, ki proizvaja druge izdelke, ustreznejše od informacij v zvezi z industrijo Unije za hladno valjane ploščate izdelke iz nerjavnega jekla.
DEFINITIVE ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
Poleg tega informacije, ki se uporabljajo v zadevi o varjenih ceveh in v zadevi o zrnato usmerjenih ploščato valjanih izdelkih iz silicijevega jekla za elektropločevine, niso novejše od informacij v obravnavani zadevi.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, definitive anti-dumping measures should be imposed on imports of stainless steel cold-rolled flat products originating in the PRC and Taiwan, in accordance with the lesser duty rule under Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se te informacije ne štejejo za ustreznejše od informacij iz začasne uredbe.
Injury elimination level
Po dokončnem razkritju je zainteresirana stran trdila, da se dobiček, ki ga je industrija Unije dosegla v letu 2007, ne more šteti kot zanesljiv ali reprezentativen, saj tržni pogoji niso bili običajni, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 162 zgoraj.
Interested parties argued that the target profit should not be based on 2007, as this was allegedly an exceptionally good year for the steel industry.
Vendar se tej strani ni zdelo vprašljivo dejstvo, da je bilo leto 2007 zgolj tretje najboljše glede dobičkonosnosti industrije, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 161 zgoraj.
The information available to the Commission has however shown that for the period of 2004-2007, the year 2007 was indeed only the third best year with regard to profitability of the industry.
Ker je dobiček industrije Unije skladen z dobičkonosnostjo, ki jo je dosegla v prejšnjem obdobju med letoma 2004 in 2006, ni mogoče sprejeti trditve, da dobiček v letu 2007 ne more biti zanesljiv ali reprezentativen.
One interested party also argued that the year 2007 was indeed exceptional, as it is comprised of quarters with very different results.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da Komisija pri izračunu neškodljive cene podobnega izdelka, s tem da prodajni ceni industrije Unije prišteje dejansko izgubo, ki jo je utrpela v obdobju preiskave, in še navedeno 8,1-odstotno stopnjo dobička, odstopa od svoje domnevno dolgoletne prakse določanja neškodljive cene tako, da stroškom proizvodnje prišteje ciljni dobiček.
Indeed, during the first two quarters of 2007, the industry performed very well, achieving profit margins above 10 %.
Obe praksi obstajata in se uporabljata.
The second two quarters however showed a very different picture, showing profit margins slightly above the break-even point or being even negative.
Ker industrija Unije ni imela primerljive prodaje, se lahko neškodljiva cena določi tako, da se skupnim stroškom prišteje ciljni dobiček.
While it may indeed be the case that this development is exceptional, this also demonstrates that the overall average for 2007 cannot be exceptionally high, as it covers two quarters of good and two quarters of poor performance of the Union industry.
Vendar je v obravnavanem primeru primerljiva prodaja bila na voljo.
Following final disclosure, one interested party argued that the target profit is comparably higher than in other investigations concerning steel products such as welded tubes and pipes [10] and grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel (‘GOES’) [11].
Poleg tega je podoben izdelek, ki ga prodaja industrija Unije, sestavljalo na tisoče vrst izdelkov in vsi vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije so imeli obsežno mrežo povezanih družb, vključno s storitvenimi centri za jeklarstvo, v katerih so nastajali stroški.
The party does however not give any arguments why information concerning an industry producing a different product is more relevant than information concerning the Union industry of SSCR itself.
Zato se ni zdelo izvedljivo, da bi zbirali informacije o stroških za vsako posamezno vrsto izdelka na ravni kontrolne številke izdelka.
Furthermore, the information used both in the welded tubes and pipes and GOES cases is not based on more recent information than in the present case either.
Namesto tega so se skupni stroški določili tako, da se je nastali tehtani povprečni izgubi prištela tehtana povprečna prodajna cena.
This information is therefore not considered more relevant than the information used in the provisional Regulation.
Nato se je k tako določenim skupnim stroškom prištela 8,1-odstotna stopnja dobička.
Following final disclosure, an interested party argued that the profit obtained by the Union industry in the year 2007 cannot be considered reliable or representative, since the market conditions were abnormal, as described in recital 162 above.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ista zainteresirana stran dodatno utemeljila, zakaj bi bilo treba neškodljivo ceno izračunati tako, da bi se stroškom proizvodnje prištel ciljni dobiček.
This party did however not question the fact that 2007 was only the third best year with regard to profitability of the industry, as stated in recital 161 above.
Prvič, stran je opozorila, da precejšnje razlike v ceni med različnimi kontrolnimi številkami izdelka, ki znaša 150 %, ni mogoče pojasniti z razlikami v stroških.
Since the profit obtained by the Union industry is in line with the profitability achieved in the previous years 2004-2006, the argument that the profit of the year 2007 cannot be reliable or representative cannot be accepted.
Vendar te utemeljitve ni podprla z nobenimi dokazi.
One interested party argued that calculating the non-injurious price of the like product by adding to the Union industry's sales prices the actual loss incurred during the investigation period and further adding the above-mentioned profit margin of 8,1 %, the Commission departs from its alleged long-standing practice of establishing the non-injurious price by adding the target profit to the cost of production.
Dejansko se je potrdilo, da imajo različne kontrolne številke izdelka zelo pomembne razlike v stroških zaradi različnih vrst, širin, debelin in končne obdelave jekla.
Both practices exist and apply.
Potrdilo se je, da lahko razlika v stroških med različnimi kontrolnimi številkami izdelka preseže 150 %.
In absence of comparable sales by the Union industry, the non-injurious price may be established by adding the target profit to the total costs.
Drugič, stran je navedla primer, v katerem je uporabila hipotetične stroške proizvodnje in hipotetične prodajne cene za hipotetično vrsto izdelka, s čimer naj bi pokazala, da je izračun ciljne cene na podlagi prodajne cene nerazumen.
In the present case, however, there were comparable sales.
Ker pa so vsi podatki v primeru hipotetični in se ne nanašajo na dejanske podatke, rezultat tega hipotetičnega primera ne more nazorno prikazati, da je uporabljena metoda nerazumna.
Moreover, the like product sold by the Union industry consisted of thousands of product types and all sampled Union producers had an extensive network of related companies, including steel service centres, which incurred costs.
Tretjič, stran trdi, da Komisija enostavno ni zbrala podatkov o stroških proizvodnje s kontrolnimi številkami izdelka od sodelujočih proizvajalcev Unije.
It was therefore considered impracticable to collect the cost information for each product type on a PCN level.
Ta trditev ni točna.
Instead, the total costs were established by adding to the weighted average sales price the weighted average loss incurred.
Komisija je podatke o stroških proizvodnje zahtevala v vprašalniku, podatke so predložili proizvajalci Unije in bili preverjeni.
Then, the profit margin of 8,1 % was added to the total costs so established.
Četrtič, stran je navedla primer, ki naj bi kazal, da je Komisija prodajnim cenam, ki so pri prodaji zelo verjetno ustvarile zelo velik dobiček, prištela ciljni dobiček.
Following final disclosure, the same interested party provided additional arguments why the non-injurious price should be calculated by adding the target profit to the cost of production.
To trditev je podkrepila s primerjavo prodajnih cen industrije Unije z njeno lastno izvozno ceno in prodajno ceno podobne kontrolne številke izdelka industrije Unije.
Firstly, the party noted that there is a significant price difference between the various PCNs of 150 % that cannot be explained by cost differences.
Vendar sta se obe kontrolni številki izdelka, uporabljeni v primeru, izvažali v zanemarljivih količinah in tako nista vplivali na stopnjo škode za družbo.
However, this argument was not supported by any evidence.
Poleg tega navedba, da je prodaja kontrolne številke izdelka zelo verjetno ustvarila zelo velik dobiček, ni bila podkrepljena niti z dokazom niti z ugotovitvami preiskave.
Indeed, it is confirmed that the various PCNs have very significant cost differences due to different steel grades, widths, thicknesses and finishing.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi s stopnjo odprave škode, se potrdijo sklepi iz uvodnih izjav od 224 do 229 začasne uredbe.
It is indeed confirmed that the cost difference between the various PCNs can exceed 150 %.
Dokončne protidampinške dajatve
Secondly, the party provided an example using a hypothetical cost of production and a hypothetical sales price for a hypothetical product type, which allegedly shows that calculating the target price on the basis of the sales price is unreasonable.
Glede na sklepe v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročno zvezo in interesom Unije ter v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe bi bilo treba dokončne protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka uvesti na ravni stopnje dampinga ali stopnje škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
However, since all information used in the example is hypothetical and does not refer to actual data, the result of this hypothetical example cannot demonstrate that the methodology used is unreasonable.
Stopnje dokončne protidampinške dajatve, izražene kot cena CIF meja Unije brez plačane carinske dajatve, so naslednje:
Thirdly, the party alleges that the Commission did simply not collect the cost of production data by PCN from the cooperating Union producers.
Preglednica 5
This claim is incorrect.
Stopnje dampinga, stopnje škode in stopnje protidampinške dajatve
The cost of production data was requested by the Commission in the questionnaire, provided by the Union producers and verified.
Država
Lastly, the party provided an example allegedly showing that the Commission added the target profit to a sales price that must have been sold at a very high profit.
Stopnja dampinga
To support this argument, they compared the Union industry's sales price both with their own export price and the Union industry's sales price of a similar PCN.
Stopnja škode
However, both PCNs used in the example were exported in insignificant quantities and did therefore not have any impact on the injury margin for the company.
Protidampinška dajatev
Furthermore, the statement that the PCN must have been sold at a very high profit is not supported by evidence and also not supported by the findings of the investigation.
LRK