natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Independent Inspector's contractual obligations should not restrict its role in carrying out compliance verification.
Pogodbene obveznosti neodvisnega inšpektorja ga ne bi smele omejevati v njegovi vlogi pri opravljanju preverjanja skladnosti.
The Independent Inspector should:
Neodvisni inšpektor bi moral:
perform its duties with due care and supervise adequately all tasks for which it is responsible,
opravljati svoje dolžnosti s potrebno skrbnostjo in ustrezno nadzorovati vse naloge, za katere je odgovoren,
be impartial in all its activities, basing its opinions and reports solely on the facts, and
biti pri vseh svojih dejavnostih nepristranski, njegova mnenja in poročila pa bi morala temeljiti izključno na dejstvih ter
respect confidentiality, where necessary, in order to protect the signatories' commercial interests or sensitive data and to this end sign a ‘non-disclosure agreement’ with the signatories to the self-regulation measure, if requested.
po potrebi spoštovati zaupnost za zaščito poslovnih interesov ali občutljivih podatkov podpisnic in na zahtevo v ta namen s podpisnicami ukrepa za samourejanje podpisati „pogodbo o nerazkrivanju podatkov“.
The self-regulation measure should lay down the procedure to select an Independent Inspector and how it will be ensured that the Inspector is free of conflict of interest and has the necessary skills for verifying compliance with the requirements.
Ukrep za samourejanje bi moral določiti postopek za izbiro neodvisnega inšpektorja in način, na katerega bo zagotovljeno, da inšpektor ni v navzkrižju interesov ter da ima znanje in spretnosti, potrebne za preverjanje skladnosti z zahtevami.
The appointment of the selected Independent Inspector is to be agreed with the Commission services.
Izbrani neodvisni inšpektor se mora imenovati v dogovoru s službami Komisije.
The Steering Committee should be involved in determining the terms and conditions of the contract of the Independent Inspector.
Usmerjevalni odbor bi moral sodelovati pri določanju pogojev pogodbe neodvisnega inšpektorja.
Compliance reporting by signatories
Poročanje o skladnosti s strani podpisnic
The self-regulation measure should lay down rules on at least the following aspects of the documentation to be submitted by each signatory to the Independent Inspector:
Ukrep za samourejanje bi moral določiti pravila vsaj o naslednjih vidikih dokumentacije, ki jo mora neodvisnemu inšpektorju predložiti vsaka podpisnica:
the type of market and technical data to be reported,
vrsti tržnih in tehničnih podatkov, ki jih je treba sporočiti,
the format in which the data are to be submitted,
obliki, v kateri je treba predložiti podatke,
the means by which documentation is to be sent, and
načinu, kako je treba poslati dokumentacijo, ter
the frequency and timing of the submission of documentation.
pogostosti predložitve dokumentacije in rokih zanjo.
Each signatory should report all the information and data (including market data and data on the environmental performance of products) necessary for the Independent Inspector to reliably verify the signatory's compliance with all the commitments undertaken in the measure.
Vsaka podpisnica bi morala sporočati vse informacije in podatke (vključno s tržnimi podatki in podatki o okoljski učinkovitosti izdelkov), ki jih neodvisni inšpektor potrebuje za zanesljivo preverjanje podpisnice glede izpolnjevanja vseh zavez, sprejetih v okviru ukrepa.
Signatories should provide market data allowing the Independent Inspector to establish whether at least 90 % of their products comply with the commitments.
Podpisnice bi morale zagotoviti tržne podatke, ki bi neodvisnemu inšpektorju omogočale, da ugotovi, ali je najmanj 90 % njihovih izdelkov skladnih z zavezami.
If signatories commit to ensuring that 100 % of their products comply with the commitments, they are not required to provide specific market data to the Independent Inspector.
Če se podpisnice zavežejo k temu, da bodo zagotavljale, da bo 100 % njihovih izdelkov skladnih z zavezami, jim neodvisnemu inšpektorju ni treba zagotovljati specifičnih tržnih podatkov.
Reporting should be carried out for every model covered by the self-regulation measure that is placed on the Union market and/or put into service.
Poročanje bi bilo treba izvesti za vse modele, ki jih zajema ukrep za samourejanje, ki so dani na trg in/ali v uporabo.
If the difference between certain models is not relevant to the self-regulation measure (i.e. it does not concern any aspect related to the requirements), reports may combine similar models, provided that this is indicated.
Če razlika med nekaterimi modeli ni relevantna za ukrep za samourejanje (tj. ne zadeva nobenega vidika v zvezi z zahtevami), so lahko v poročilih združeni podobni modeli, če je to navedeno.
The information and data reported by the signatories may differ only inasmuch as their respective commitments differ.
Informacije in podatki, ki so jih sporočile podpisnice, se lahko razlikujejo le toliko, kolikor se razlikujejo njihove zaveze.
The format in which data are to be submitted to the Independent Inspector should be the same for all signatories.
Oblika, v kateri je treba neodvisnemu inšpektorju predložiti podatke, mora biti enaka za vse podpisnice.
The means should, as far as possible, take advantage of electronic means of communication, whilst taking account of confidentiality requirements and the administrative burden placed on all parties concerned.
Pri načinu sporočanja bi bilo treba v največji možni meri izkoristiti elektronska komunikacijska sredstva, ob tem pa upoštevati zahteve glede zaupnosti in upravno breme vseh zadevnih strani.
The period to be reported on should be 1 year.
Poročati bi se moralo o obdobju enega leta.
Each signatory should every year provide the documentation within 2 months after the end of the reporting period.
Vsaka podpisnica bi morala vsako leto predložiti dokumentacijo v dveh mesecih po koncu obdobja poročanja.
Additional requests made by the Independent Inspector for signatories to provide any missing information after the deadline should be honoured within a short deadline, to be specified in the self-regulation measure.
Dodatne zahteve neodvisnega inšpektorja, da podpisnice predložijo manjkajoče podatke po izteku roka, bi bilo treba spoštovati v kratkem roku, ki se opredeli v ukrepu za samourejanje.
Compliance verification
Preverjanje skladnosti
The self-regulation measure should empower the Independent Inspector to verify compliance with the requirements of the self-regulation measure through:
Ukrep za samourejanje bi moral neodvisnega inšpektorja pooblastiti za preverjanje skladnosti z zahtevami ukrepa za samourejanje s:
checking the documentation provided by signatories;
preverjanjem dokumentacije, ki jo predložijo podpisnice,
testing products; and
preizkušanjem izdelkov ter
inspecting the signatories' premises.
pregledom prostorov podpisnic.
The Independent Inspector should decide on an appropriate combination of these methods.
Neodvisni inšpektor bi moral določiti ustrezno kombinacijo teh metod.
Testing
Preizkušanje
Testing concerns verifying the characteristics of products covered by the self-regulation measure by means of physical tests performed in a laboratory.
Preizkušanje se nanaša na preverjanje lastnosti proizvodov, ki jih zajema ukrep za samourejanje, v obliki fizičnih preizkušanj v laboratoriju.
As a general rule, this should be done in an independent laboratory, preferably an accredited one.
Na splošno bi moral to opraviti neodvisen laboratorij, po možnosti akreditiran.
As an alternative, testing activities may be performed on the premises of one of the signatories, provided that full objectivity can be guaranteed.
Alternativno se lahko dejavnosti preizkušanja izvajajo v prostorih ene od podpisnic, če je mogoče zagotoviti popolno objektivnost.
The Independent Inspector should select, at random, an adequate number of products from different signatories for testing, preferably acquiring them from retailers in different Member States (physical or online shops).
Neodvisni inšpektor bi moral za preizkušanje naključno izbrati ustrezno število izdelkov različnih podpisnic in jih, če je to mogoče, pridobiti od trgovcev na drobno v različnih državah članicah (fizične ali spletne trgovine).
If signatories provide the products directly, they should not be involved in selecting the samples.
Če podpisnice zagotovijo izdelke neposredno, ne bi smele biti vključene v izbiro vzorcev.
The Independent Inspector may select specific models or select models from a specific signatory if information obtained from any source points to possible non-compliance of those models or that signatory.
Neodvisni inšpektor lahko izbere posebne modele ali modele izbere od posamezne podpisnice, če informacije, pridobljene iz katerega koli vira, kažejo na morebitne neskladnosti navedenih modelov ali navedene podpisnice.
The signatories should provide, on the request of the Independent Inspector, specific documentation and information required for the purpose of testing, if this is not included in the documentation supplied with the products.
Podpisnice bi morale na zahtevo neodvisnega inšpektorja predložiti posebno dokumentacijo in informacije, potrebne za namene preizkušanja, če to ni vključeno v dokumentaciji, ki spremlja izdelke.
The detailed test reports for each separate product tested should be provided to the Commission and to the signatory concerned.
Podrobna poročila o preizkusih za vsak posamezni preskušeni izdelek bi moral biti predložen Komisiji in zadevni podpisnici.
The Independent Inspector may carry out an inspection of a specific signatory on the basis of specific information justifying such an inspection.
Neodvisni inšpektor lahko opravi inšpekcijski pregled posamezne podpisnice na podlagi specifičnih informacij, ki upravičujejo tak pregled.
The specific information should be disclosed to the signatory concerned.
Zadevni podpisnici bi bilo treba razkriti specifične informacije.
An inspection should only be used as a means of checking compliance with the commitments made under the self-regulation measure if no other more cost-effective means is available.
Pregled bi bilo treba uporabiti le kot sredstvo za preverjanje skladnosti z zavezami, ki izhajajo iz ukrepa za samourejanje, če ni na voljo drug stroškovno učinkovitejši način.
During an inspection, the Independent Inspector should only carry out those activities that are strictly necessary for checking the compliance of the signatory with the commitments made under the self-regulation measure.
Pri pregledu bi moral neodvisni inšpektor opraviti samo tiste dejavnosti, ki so nujno potrebne za preverjanje skladnosti podpisnice z zavezami, ki izhajajo iz ukrepa za samourejanje.
The Independent Inspector should not give the signatory advance warning of the inspection or only at short notice.
Neodvisni inšpektor podpisnic ne bi smel vnaprej opozoriti o inšpekcijskem pregledu ali le v zelo kratkem času.
The signatory should provide any support required.
Podpisnica bi morala zagotoviti vso potrebno podporo.
The Independent Inspector should send a draft of the inspection report to the signatory concerned for comment within 1 month of the inspection.
Neodvisni inšpektor bi moral v mesecu dni od pregleda zadevni podpisnici poslati osnutek poročila o inšpekcijskem pregledu za pripombe.
The signatory should submit its comments within 2 weeks of receiving the draft report.
Podpisnica bi morala predložiti svoje pripombe v dveh tednih od prejema osnutka poročila.
The Independent Inspector should, within 2 weeks, amend, if necessary, the draft report to take account of the comments received from the signatory.
Neodvisni inšpektor bi moral po potrebi v dveh tednih spremeniti osnutek poročila, s katerimi bi upošteval pripombe podpisnic.
The report, including the reason for the inspection, should be provided to the Commission and to the signatory concerned.
Poročilo bi moralo biti predloženo Komisiji in zadevni podpisnici, vključno z razlogom za pregled.
A summary should be presented at the first meeting of the Steering Committee held following the finalisation of the report.
Povzetek bi moral biti predstavljen na prvem zasedanju usmerjevalnega odbora po zaključku poročila.
The summary should not disclose any commercially sensitive information, unless this is necessary to prove non-compliance.
Povzetek ne bi smel razkrivati poslovno občutljivih informacij, razen če je to potrebno za dokazovanje neskladnosti.
Reporting by the Independent Inspector
Poročanje neodvisnega inšpektorja
The Independent Inspector should prepare the draft compliance report and send it to the members of the Steering Committee at the latest 3 months after the end of the reporting period.
Neodvisni inšpektor bi moral pripraviti osnutek poročila o skladnosti in ga poslati članom usmerjevalnega odbora najpozneje tri mesece po koncu obdobja poročanja.
The members of the Steering Committee should be allowed 2 weeks to submit their comments on the report.
Člani usmerjevalnega odbora bi morali imeti možnost, da v dveh tednih predložijo svoje pripombe glede poročila.
The Independent Inspector should submit the final version of the compliance report to the Steering Committee at the latest 4 months after the end of the reporting period.
Neodvisni inšpektor bi moral usmerjevalnemu odboru predložiti končno različico poročila o skladnosti najpozneje štiri mesece po koncu obdobja poročanja.
The compliance report should include:
Poročilo o skladnosti bi moralo vključevati:
information about the data collection and processing methods used and any difficulties encountered in preparing the report*,
informacije o uporabljenih metodah zbiranja in obdelave podatkov ter morebitne težave pri pripravi poročila*,
the results of document checking*,
rezultate pregleda listin*,
the approach for selecting products for testing and if specific models or signatories were targeted, the reasons for doing so*,
pristop, ki je bil uporabljen pri izbiri izdelkov za preizkušanje, in ali so bili tarča izbire specifični modeli ali podpisnice ter razloge za to*,
a list of products tested and a summary of the individual results,
seznam preizkušenih izdelkov in povzetek posameznih rezultatov,
summaries of any inspections carried out during the reporting period,
povzetke pregledov, opravljenih v obdobju poročanja,
a list of non-compliant signatories,
seznam neskladnih podpisnic,
information about the reasons for any non-compliance*, and
informacije o razlogih za kakršne koli neskladnosti* ter
recommendations for future reporting periods.
priporočila za prihodnja poročevalna obdobja.
The self-regulation measure may specify that the items indicated with an asterisk (*) should be presented in aggregated form summarising the results for all the signatories combined and not include individual signatories' commercial or confidential data.
Ukrep za samourejanje lahko določi, da bi se morale točke, označene z zvezdico (*), predstaviti v zbirni obliki, ki povzema rezultate za vse podpisnice skupaj in ne vključuje poslovnih ali zaupnih podatkov posameznih podpisnic.
In such cases, individual reports containing the specific information separately for each signatory concerning those items should be provided to the Commission and to the signatory concerned.
V takih primerih bi bilo treba individualna poročila, ki vsebujejo specifične informacije za vsako podpisnico posebej v zvezi z navedenimi postavkami, predložiti Komisiji in zadevni podpisnici.
Non-compliance should be subject to a graduated scale of sanctions.
Za neskladnost bi morala veljati stopnjevana lestvica sankcij.
A signatory failing to report its compliance report to the Independent Inspector should be subject to an inspection by the Independent Inspector in the year following the reporting period concerned.
Pri podpisnici, ki neodvisnemu inšpektorju ne predloži svojega poročila o skladnosti, bi moral neodvisni inšpektor opraviti pregled v letu, ki sledi obdobju poročanja.
A repeated failure to report compliance documentation should lead to immediate exclusion of the signatory from the self-regulation measure.
Če podpisnica večkrat ne predloži dokumentacije o skladnosti, se jo nemudoma izključi iz ukrepa za samourejanje.
A signatory that, according to the Independent Inspector's inspection or compliance report, has not complied with the requirements of the self-regulation measure should be required to take corrective action.
Od podpisnic, ki glede na inšpekcijski pregled ali poročilo o skladnosti ne izpolnjuje zahtev ukrepa za samourejanje, bi bilo treba zahtevati popravne ukrepe.
Non-compliance that continues for more than 6 months after the report by the Independent Inspector should lead to immediate exclusion of the signatory from the self-regulation measure.
Neskladnost, ki traja več kot šest mesecev po poročilu neodvisnega inšpektorja, bi morala povzročiti takojšnjo izključitev podpisnice iz ukrepa za samourejanje.
The Chair should inform the Steering Committee in writing of the exclusion of any non-compliant signatory within 1 week of receiving information from the Independent Inspector that a condition for immediate exclusion has been met.
Predsednik bi moral usmerjevalni odbor pisno obvestiti o izključitvi katere koli neskladne podpisnice v enem tednu po prejemu informacije od neodvisnega inšpektorja, da je bil izpolnjen pogoj za takojšnjo izključitev.
The signatories should bear all expenses related to the Independent Inspector and its activities, the website and the operation of the Steering Committee, except for the costs of participation of the representative of the Commission and the observers other than the Independent Inspector.
Podpisnice bi morale kriti vse stroške, povezane z neodvisnim inšpektorjem in njegovimi dejavnostmi, spletiščem in delovanjem usmerjevalnega odbora, razen stroškov udeležbe predstavnika Komisije in opazovalcev, ki niso neodvisni inšpektor.
The self-regulation measure should encourage the signatories to share expertise, experience, information and best practice with signatories to other ecodesign self-regulation measures.
Ukrep za samourejanje bi moral podpisnice spodbuditi v izmenjavo strokovnega znanja, izkušenj, informacij in dobrih praks s podpisnicami drugih ukrepov za samourejanje v zvezi z okoljsko primerno zasnovo.
The self-regulation measure should state its policy objectives.
V ukrepu za samourejanje bi morali biti navedeni cilji politike.
These should be consistent with the policy objectives of the Directive.
Ti bi morali biti skladni s cilji politike Direktive.
The proposed self-regulation measure should be consistent with other factors and incentives at national level.
Predlagani ukrep za samourejanje bi moral biti skladen z drugimi dejavniki in pobudami na nacionalni ravni.
Better regulation for better results — An EU agenda, COM(2015) 215.
Boljše pravno urejanje za boljše rezultate – agenda EU, COM(2015) 215.
Cf.
Prim. uvodne izjave 18–21 in člen 15(3)(b) ter člen 17 Direktive.
Recitals 18-21 and Articles 15(3)(b) and 17 of the Directive.
Priloga VIII k Direktivi.
Annex VIII to the Directive.
COM(2012) 684, COM(2013) 23 in COM(2015) 178.
COM(2012) 684, COM(2013) 23 and COM(2015) 178.
Direktiva 2010/30/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. maja 2010 o navajanju porabe energije in drugih virov izdelkov, povezanih z energijo, s pomočjo nalepk in standardiziranih podatkov o izdelku (UL L 153, 18.6.2010, str. 1).
Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products (OJ L 153, 18.6.2010, p. 1).
Uredba (ES) št. 66/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009 o znaku EU za okolje (OJ L 27, 30.1.2010, p.
Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the EU Ecolabel (OJ L 27, 30.1.2010, p. 1).
1).
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2016/2256
Priporočilo Komisije (EU) 2016/2256
addressed to the Member States on the resumption of transfers to Greece under Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council
naslovljeno na države članice o ponovni vzpostavitvi predaj Grčiji v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 604/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
The transfer of applicants for international protection to Greece under Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [1] (hereafter ‘the Dublin Regulation’) has been suspended by Member States since 2011, following two judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) [2], which identified systemic deficiencies in the Greek asylum system, resulting in a violation of the fundamental rights of applicants for international protection transferred from other Member States to Greece under Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 [3].
Države članice so leta 2011 začasno ustavile predaje prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito Grčiji v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 604/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: dublinska uredba) na podlagi sodb Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ESČP) [2] in Sodišča Evropske unije, v katerih so bile ugotovljene sistemske pomanjkljivosti grškega azilnega sistema, zaradi česar je prihajalo do kršitev temeljnih pravic prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito, ki so jih druge države članice predale Grčiji v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 343/2003 [3].
The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe has been monitoring the situation in Greece since the M.S.S v Belgium and Greece judgment was delivered by the ECHR in 2011 on the basis of progress reports that Greece is required to submit as evidence of the execution of the judgment and on the basis of evidence from NGOs and international organisations, such as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), that operate in Greece.
Po razglasitvi sodbe ESČP v zadevi M. S. S. proti Belgiji in Grčiji leta 2011 je Odbor ministrov Sveta Evrope spremljal stanje v Grčiji na podlagi poročil o napredku, ki jih mora Grčija predložiti kot dokaz, da izvršuje sodbo, ter na podlagi dokazov nevladnih in mednarodnih organizacij, ki delujejo v Grčiji, kot je Urad Visokega komisarja Združenih narodov za begunce (UNHCR).
At the request of Greece submitted in June 2016, the Ministerial Committee has accepted to postpone the evaluation procedure on the basis of the argument that Greece is currently under enormous migratory pressure, that the situation is exceptional, unstable and not the same as it was when the M.S.S judgment was delivered five years ago.
Odbor ministrov je na zahtevo Grčije, predloženo junija 2016, privolil v odložitev postopka ocenjevanja na podlagi argumenta, da je Grčija trenutno izpostavljena ogromnemu migracijskemu pritisku ter da gre za izredne in nestabilne razmere, ki so drugačne kot pred petimi leti, ko je bila izdana sodba v zadevi M. S. S.
As a result of the M.S.S judgment, Greece committed to reform its asylum system on the basis of a national Action Plan on Asylum Reform and Migration Management presented in August 2010 and revised in January 2013 (hereafter ‘the Greek Action Plan’).
Grčija se je zaradi sodbe v zadevi M. S. S. zavezala k reformi svojega azilnega sistema na podlagi nacionalnega akcijskega načrta za azilno reformo in upravljanje migracij, ki je bil predstavljen avgusta 2010 in revidiran januarja 2013 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: grški akcijski načrt).
On 1 October 2015, Greece presented a Roadmap on the implementation of the relocation scheme and the hotspots approach to the Council, which also outlines certain actions to be prioritised to ensure implementation of agreed pending actions in the areas of asylum and reception.
Grčija je 1. oktobra 2015 Svetu predstavila časovni načrt za izvajanje programa za premestitev in pristopa žariščnih točk, v katerem je opredelila tudi nekatere ukrepe, ki jih je treba obravnavati prednostno, da se zagotovi izvajanje dogovorjenih še neizvršenih ukrepov na področju azila in sprejema.
Between January and 4 December 2016, 171909 migrants arrived irregularly in Greece [4].
Med januarjem in 4. decembrom 2016 je v Grčijo neregularno prispelo 171909 migrantov [4].