natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the fact that Ryanair traffic accounts for 85 % of the low-cost traffic assumptions;
Do 31. decembra 2007 se je stopnja na terminalu mp1 razlikovala za nacionalne destinacije, destinacije v EU in mednarodne destinacije.
the fact that Ryanair traffic accounts for 2694 flights (corresponding to an aircraft with 189 seats and a load factor of 75 %).
Na terminalu mp2 razlikovanja ni bilo.
This study reveals that the presence of Ryanair at Marseille Provence Airport, under the charging conditions that it was offered, in particular the reductions for new routes and also for overnight parking, and given the purchase of marketing services from its subsidiary, leads to the airport making a loss in the first three years, with a profit being generated for the airport only from the fourth year of operation [87].
Od 1. januarja 2008 (in za retroaktivne stopnje za leti 2006 in 2007) so se stopnje na terminalu mp1 razlikovale za lete znotraj schengenskega območja, zunaj schenchenskega območja in mednarodne lete, na terminalu mp2 pa za nacionalne lete in lete znotraj EU ter mednarodne lete.
It is apparent from the business plan that, over 15 years (2007-2021), the average profit margin for all flights is high enough to meet the profitability expectations of a market economy operator.
Predstavnik družbe Air France v odboru Cocoéco ni glasoval proti uvedbi zagonske pomoči; glej pritožbo družbe Air France z dne 27. marca 2007, str. 14.
The agreement of 19 May 2006 was concluded with a view to the medium-term development of the airport's traffic.
Družba Air France je Komisiji poslala izvod pogojev.
The AMS agreement replaced the marketing measures originally included in the business plan for the Terminal mp2 construction project.
CE, 27. julij 2011, družba Air France in drugi, št. 329818, 340540.
The average cost of the agreement with AMS per Ryanair passenger therefore allowed the Terminal mp2 construction project to be profitable as a whole.
Sporočilo Komisije – Smernice Skupnosti o financiranju letališč in zagonski državni pomoči letalskim družbam z odhodi z regionalnih letališč (UL C 312, 9.12.2005, str. 1).
Table 14
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
Simulation of the profitability of the AMS agreement in relation to Ryanair traffic (including the effects of the modulated charges)
Sporočilo Komisije „Akcijski načrt za zmogljivost letališč, učinkovitost in varnost v Evropi“, COM(2006) 819 final, neobjavljen v UL.
Total traffic assumption
Komisija opozarja na neskladnost v odgovoru Francije, ki najprej navaja, da je znesek pomoči, katerega združljivost je treba analizirati, 932649 EUR (str. 26), nato 980 EUR.
Ryanair outbound passengers ([…]* %)
Francija pojasnjuje, da je bilo v študiji učinka, ki jo je opravila zbornica CCIMP, ugotovljeno, da so tovorne dejavnosti letališča zagotavljale 582 delovnih mest leta 2000 in 614 leta 2009.
Number of Ryanair outbound flights
Francija pojasnjuje, da se je tovorni promet med letoma 2005 in 2010 povečal za 20,86 % in je leta 2010 dosegel 52179 ton.
AMS advertising purchases (EUR)
V pogodbi, sklenjeni med zbornico CCIMP in mestno skupnostjo Marseille Provence Métropole, je določeno, da je bila udeležba javne skupnosti določena na podlagi naložbenih programov, ki jih je predlagalo letališče Marseille in upoštevala metropola, ter da so sredstva strogo namenjena kritju tako potrjenih izdatkov, da je letna javna udeležba omejena na dejanske izdatke letališča v poslovnem letu, da vsak zahtevek za sredstva spremlja poročilo o izdatkih in da zbornica CCIMP da metropoli na razpolago vse račune v zvezi z operacijami.
Price of agreement per pax
V sklepih svetovalnega odbora letališča, ki jih je predložila Francija, je v primeru letališča Pariz naveden WACC v višini od 5,8 % do 6,5 % za obdobje 2006–2010 in od 6,2 % do 6,8 % za obdobje 2011–2015, v primeru letališča Toulouse pa od 6 % do 6,5 % za obdobje 2009–2013.
Margin on traffic after AMS
Direktiva 2009/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2009 o letaliških pristojbinah (UL L 70, 14.3.2009, str. 11).
Average price per pax of AMS agreement calculated over 5 years
Odločba z dne 14. junija 1999, Letališče Manchester, NN 109/98.
Average price per pax of AMS agreement calculated over 10 years
Odločba Komisije 2004/393/ES z dne 12. februarja 2004 o ugodnostih, ki jih je regija Valonija priznala letališču Charleroi (UL L 137, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
Income (EUR)
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1998/2006 z dne 15. decembra 2006 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe pri pomoči de minimis (UL L 379, 28.12.2006, str. 5).
Costs (EUR)
Odločba Komisije 98/337/ES z dne 21. januarja 1998 o pomoči, ki jo je Flamska regija dodelila družbi Air Belgium in organizatorju potovanj Sunair za uporabo letališča Ostende (UL L 148, 19.5.1998, str. 36).
Margin (EUR)
Sklep Komisije 2011/60/EU z dne 27. januarja 2010 o državni pomoči C-12/08 (ex NN 74/07) – Slovaška – Sporazum med letališčem Bratislava in družbo Ryanair (notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2010) 183) (UL L 27, 1.2.2011, str. 24).
Net margin (EUR)
Sestanek odbora za letališča z dne 15. novembra 2005.
NPV at […]* % (EUR)
Odločba Komisije z dne 28. januarja 2009, pomoč E4/2007, C(2009) 184 final.
As a result, the charges applied to the airlines, taking into account the various reductions and the costs of the agreement with AMS, always cover at least the additional costs associated with each airline's use of the airport.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. aprila 2002 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, C-482/99, Recueil 2002, str.
Before any subsequent changes to the charges and before the signature of the marketing agreement with AMS, the airport produced plausible estimates showing that the measures would positively contribute to the airport's profitability.
I-4397.
The assumptions made and other scenarios envisaged in the original business plan and its updates, just like the financial calculations associated with subsequent measures, seemed realistic at the time that they were produced.
Družba Ryanair se v podporo tej trditvi sklicuje na mnenje Conseil d'État z dne 16. junija 1992, št. 351 654.
Subsequent developments have in fact shown that they were rather conservative.
Družba Ryanair se v zvezi s tem sklicuje na odstavke sklepa o začetku postopka o tem, da zbornica CCIMP ni izterjala povračil, izhajajočih iz uporabe retroaktivnih stopenj, ponavljajočih se zahtevah Francije, naj se ukinejo znižane pristojbine za nacionalne lete, in tem, da je zbornica CCIMP uvedla pomoč za trženje brez predhodnega dovoljenja Francije.
Moreover, they have been regularly updated and revised and the charges have been regularly adapted to guarantee the airport's profitability in the long term and changes to the charges in the short term.
Družba Ryanair se sklicuje na sodbo Splošnega sodišča z dne 17. decembra 2008 v zadevi Ryanair proti Komisiji, T-196/04.
Conclusion on the existence of aid
Družba Ryanair opozarja, da terminal mp2 nima: dragih marmornih oblog, spuščenih stropov, monitorjev v prostorih za vkrcanje, naprave za transport prtljage v glavno halo, vozičkov za prtljago, čakalnic, informacijskih točk, tekočih stopnic in tekočih trakov ter teleskopskih koridorjev.
It is clear from Section 6.3 that Marseille Provence Airport has benefited from investment aid that is compatible with the internal market.
Družba Ryanair se v podporo tej trditvi sklicuje na sklep CAA UK z dne 27. maja 2011 v zvezi s pritožbo družbe Ryanair zoper pristojbino, ki se je diskriminacijsko uporabljala na letališču Gatwick.
The Commission considers that, where an airport operator has benefited from compatible aid, the advantage resulting from such aid cannot be passed on to a specific airline, particularly if the following conditions are met:
Glej opombo 18.
the infrastructure is open to all airlines (including infrastructure that is more likely to be used by certain categories, such as low-cost airlines or charter airlines) and is not reserved for a particular airline, and
Sodba Sodišča z dne 15. maja 2002 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, C-482/99, Recueil, str.
the airlines pay charges covering at least the incremental costs.
I-04397, točki 52 in 58.
In the present case, the Commission firstly notes that Terminal mp2 and its adjacent aircraft parking area are not reserved for a particular airline.
Sklep 2011/60/EU, uvodna izjava 114.
Terminal mp2 is open to all airlines wishing to use it, on the understanding that it offers a limited level of service.
Upravno sodišče v Marseillu, sklep sodnika za začasne odredbe z dne 17. marca 2011, št. 1101332, s katerim je sodišče razsodilo, da položaj ne pomeni dovolj resnega in neposrednega posega v javni interes, da bi lahko pomenil nujni pogoj, ter zavrnilo predlog za začasno odredbo, o tožbi pa se odloča še meritorno.
To ensure that the terminal was open to all interested operators, the airport launched a call for expressions of interest in using the infrastructure.
Glej Sporočilo Komisije o uporabi pravil Evropske unije o državni pomoči za nadomestilo, dodeljeno za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena (UL C 8, 11.1.2012, str. 4, točka 2.1) in s tem povezano sodno prakso, zlasti sodbo Sodišča z dne 12. septembra 2000 v združenih zadevah Pavlov in drugi, od C-180/98 do C-184/98, Recueil 2000, str.
However, as it is not being operated to full capacity, the terminal is available to any interested airline.
I-6451.
Secondly, according to the assessment set out above (see Sections 7.2.2.1-7.2.2.5), the airlines also pay charges covering at least the incremental costs generated by each agreement.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. junija 1987 v zadevi Komisija proti Italiji, 118/85, Recueil 1987, str. 2599, točka 7; zadeva Komisija proti Italiji, C-35/96, Recueil 1998, str.
The Commission notes that the agreements under investigation form part of the airport's overall strategy leading to profitability, at least in the long term.
I-3851, točka 36; zadeva Pavlov in drugi, točka 75.
To assess the effect of agreements between the airport and an airline on the airport's profitability, the Commission takes account of the factual evidence available, as also the developments that could reasonably have been expected at the time when the agreements were concluded.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 29. oktobra 1980 v združenih zadevah Van Landewyck, od 209/78 do 215/78 in 218/78, Recueil 1980, str. 3125, točka 88; sodba Sodišča z dne 16. novembra 1995 v zadevi FFSA in drugi, C-244/94, Recueil 1995, str.
It takes into account in particular:
I-4013, točka 21; in sodba Sodišča z dne 1. julija 2008 v zadevi MOTOE, C-49/07, ZOdl.
the market conditions prevailing at the time, in particular changes occurring following liberalisation of the air transport market, the arrival on the market and development of low-cost airlines [88] and other ‘point-to-point’ carriers, changes to the organisational and economic structure of the airport sector [89]. the degree of diversification and the complexity of the functions performed by airports, the reinforcement of competition between airlines and between airports, the uncertain economic context due to changes in market conditions, or any other uncertainty existing in the economic context;
2008, str. 4863, točki 27 in 28.
the expected long-term effects on the airport's profitability.
Sodba z dne 19. januarja 1994 v zadevi SAT Fluggesellschaft mbH proti Eurocontrol, C-364/92, Recueil 1994, str.
The Commission points out that, according to the information provided by France, the airport expected, in the original business plan that led to the decision to construct Terminal mp2, to achieve a positive NPV in the long term.
I-43.
According to France, the financial results of Terminal mp2 have confirmed these optimistic expectations.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 18. marca 1998 v zadevi Diego Calì & Figli proti Servizi Ecologici Porto di Genova, C-343/95, Recueil 1997, str.
Likewise, the reductions granted on the charges, which were applicable to the entire airport including Terminal mp1, were based on sound financial calculations according to which the airport could expect to achieve profitability by adopting these measures.
I-1547.
The Commission takes the view that the forecasts of the profitability and use of Terminal mp2 were reasonable and sound.
Odločba Komisije z dne 19. marca 2003, N 309/2002, Letalska varnost – nadomestilo stroškov po napadih 11. septembra 2001.
Most of the time they have proved to be conservative.
Odločba Komisije z dne 16. oktobra 2002, N 438/2002, Subvencije belgijskim pristaniškim upravam za izvrševanje nalog javne oblasti.
Consequently, the Commission considers that the charges applied, the reductions granted and the marketing agreement concluded with AMS form part of the airport's overall strategy leading to profitability, at least in the long term.
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 12. maja 2011 v združenih zadevah Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais, T-267/08 in T-279/08, še neobjavljena, točka 108.
It is therefore of the opinion that the agreements concluded between Marseille Provence Airport and the user airlines do not constitute State aid.
V zvezi z opredelitvijo sredstev ESRR kot državne pomoči glej Odločbo Komisije v zadevi N 514/2006, South Yorkshire digital region broadband project (Projekt za širokopasovni dostop „Digital Region“ v južnem Yorkshiru), točka 29, in Odločbo Komisije v zadevi N 44/2010, Development of infrastructure on Krievu Sala for relocation of port activities out of the city centre (Razvoj infrastrukture na otoku Krievu Sala za premestitev pristaniških dejavnosti iz središča mesta), točki 69 in 70.
Furthermore, it considers that, under these circumstances, even if State aid had been granted to the airlines, this would in any event have been compatible with the internal market for the same reasons proving the compatibility of the aid granted to the airport.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 14. februarja 1990 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji, C-301/87, Recueil 1990, str.
As one of the cumulative criteria pursuant to Article 107(1) TFEU is not fulfilled, the Commission considers that the measures under investigation are free of State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
I-307, točka 41.
CONCLUSION
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 24. marca 2011 v združenih zadevah Freistaat Sachsen in drugi proti Komisiji, T-443/08 in T-445/08, ZOdl.
MEASURES IN FAVOUR OF THE AIRPORT
2011, str.
The Commission finds that France unlawfully granted investment aid to Marseille Provence Airport in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
II-0000, točka 107.
However, it must be stated that this aid is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v zadevi Francija proti Komisiji (Stardust Marine), C-482/99, točka 69.
The airport tax and the transfers between the airport and the CCIMP do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Francija podredno navaja, da subvencija, ki jo je generalni svet dodelil za financiranje terminala mp2, pomeni pomoč, združljivo z določbami Pogodbe.
MEASURES IN FAVOUR OF AIRLINES USING THE AIRPORT
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 12. decembra 2000 v zadevi Alitalia proti Komisiji, T-296/97, Recueil 2000, str.
The Commission finds that the airport acted as a market economy operator in its financial relations with the airlines using the airport.
II-3871, točka 84; zgoraj navedena sodba C-305/89, točka 20.
The various modulated charges and the marketing agreement with AMS do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU,
Glej v zvezi s tem smernice iz leta 2005, točka 46.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Glej sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 21. januarja 1999 v združenih zadevah Neue Maxhütte Stahlwerke in Lech Stahlwerke proti Komisiji, T-129/95, T-2/96 in T-97/96, Recueil 1999, str.
Article 1
II-17, točka 120.
The investment subsidies granted by France to Marseille Provence Airport in the amount of EUR 12,337 million are State aid compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.
Glej tudi sodbo Sodišča z dne 10. julija 1986 v zadevi Belgija proti Komisiji, C-40/85, Recueil 1986, str. 2321, točka 13.
The airport tax payable to the airport, the transfers between the airport and the CCIMP, the reduced charges for airlines using the airport, and the marketing agreement with AMS granted by France do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Storitve, ki jih je splošna služba opravljala za letališče, so po navedbah Francije vključevale upravne in organizacijske naloge, upravljanje človeških virov in pravno svetovanje.
Article 2
Za podrobno oceno ratione temporis v zvezi s smernicami iz leta 2005 se Komisija sklicuje na točke 218 do 222 svojega sklepa o začetku postopka.
This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.
Odločba Komisije z dne 18.
Done at Brussels, 20 February 2014.
Februarja 2011 v zadevi o državni pomoči NN 26/2009 – Grčija – Povečanje letališča Ioannina, uvodni izjavi 69 in 70.
For the Commission
Akcijski načrt, točka 7 in okvir na strani 3.
Vice-President
Pri scenariju brez izgradnje novega terminala skupni denarni tok v obdobju znaša […]* EUR, medtem ko pri scenariju z izgradnjo terminala mp2 skupni denarni tok v obdobju znaša […]* EUR.
OJ C 334, 15.11.2011, p. 8.
Razlika med scenarijema povzroči notranjo stopnjo donosa v višini […]* %.
Act No 2005-882 of 2 August 2005 in favour of small and medium-sized enterprises.
Razlog za omejen promet v letu 2006 je pozno odprtje terminala mp2 (konec oktobra 2006).
Under French law, administrative supervision is a form of power exercised by one legal person governed by public law over another.
Skupna zmogljivost: 3,8 milijona potnikov.
Regional and local chambers of commerce and industry are supervised by the regional prefect, assisted by the regional public finance officer.
Skupna zmogljivost: 8,6 milijona potnikov.
In accordance with the Constitution and the law, administrative supervision concerns only control of the legality of acts adopted by the legal person under supervision.
Komisija uporabi isto merilo združljivosti za tovorni promet, glej Sklep Komisije SA.30743 (11/C) (ex N 138/10) – Nemčija – Financiranje infrastrukturnih ukrepov na letališču Leipzig/Halle (UL C 284, 28.9.2011, str. 6, točka 128).
Articles R.712-2 to R.712-11-1 of the Commercial Code.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1260/1999 z dne 21. junija 1999 o splošnih določbah o Strukturnih skladih (UL L 161, 26.6.1999, str. 1, člen 1).
Information covered by professional secrecy.
Glej opombo 31.
The Commission understands that the Council of State judgment had the effect of annulling the charges ex tunc, i.e. from their entry into force.
Direktiva Komisije 2000/52/ES z dne 26. julija 2000 o spremembah Direktive 80/723/EGS o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji (UL L 193, 29.7.2000, str. 75).
After being annulled, these charges were therefore deemed never to have existed.
Direktiva 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev (UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str. 114).
The Commission understands that, in the absence of new approved charges, Article 224-4-1-II of the Civil Aviation Code provides that the previous charges (applicable before 1 June 2006) apply.
Direktiva 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem in transportnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev (UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
Coverage rate by the airport charges in both cases of [50-80]* % on average from 2007-2012, and overall coverage rates of [100-150]* % (mp1) and [100-150]* % (Terminal mp2) on average (including non-aeronautical revenues from the car parks, shops and rental companies).
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 12. decembra 1996 v zadevi Air France proti Komisiji, T-358/94, Recueil 1996, str.
Council of State, 27 July 2011, Air France et al., No 329818, 340540.
II-2109, točka 62.
Article L.224-2 of the Civil Aviation Code states that the overall income from these charges cannot exceed the cost of the services provided at the airport.
Pogodbe, sklenjene z generalnim svetom 3. oktobra 2002, 5. septembra 2003 in 19. maja 2005 ter mestno skupnostjo Provence Métropole 14. maja 2004.
Up to 31 December 2007, there were different charges for national, EU and international destinations from Terminal mp1.
Pogodbi z dne 5. septembra 2003 in 19. maja 2005.
There was no differentiation for Terminal mp2.
Glej na primer preambulo pogodbe z dne 19. maja 2005.
From 1 January 2008 (and for the 2006 and 2007 retroactive charges), there have been different charges for Schengen EU/non-Schengen EU/International for Terminal mp1 and National + EU/International for Terminal mp2.
Glej Sklep 2011/60/EU in Sklep Komisije 2013/664/EU z dne 25. julija 2012 o ukrepu SA.23324 – C 25/07 (ex NN 26/07) – Finska Družbe Finavia, Airpro in Ryanair na letališču Tampere-Pirkkala (UL L 309, 19.11.2013, str. 27).
Air France's representative on Cocoéco did not vote against the introduction of the start-up aid (see Air France's complaint of 27 March 2007, p. 14).
Glej poročilo regionalne računovodske zbornice Akvitanije o zbornici CCIPB, obravnavano 19. oktobra 2006, v katerem je ugotovljeno zlasti, da je „družba AMS zgolj veja družbe Ryanair, ki jo upravljata dva vodstvena delavca družbe Ryanair“.
Air France sent a copy of the conditions to the Commission.
Dopis Francije z dne 12. marca 2012, stran 108.
Council of State, 27.7.2011, Air France et al., No 329818, 340540.
Komisija bo torej v nadaljevanju ocene uporabljala izraz „družba Ryanair/AMS“ za poimenovanje upravičenca do zadevnih ukrepov.
Communication from the Commission — Community guidelines on financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports (OJ C 312, 9.12.2005, p. 1).
Ali odprtja nove proge.
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1).
Odprtje proge, sprememba števila povezav ali njihove pogostosti itd.
Communication from the Commission — an action plan for airport capacity, efficiency and safety in Europe, COM(2006) 819 final, not published in the OJ.
Poleg tega je iz študije, ki je bila opravljena naknadno na podlagi prometa, ustvarjenega v letih 2007 in 2008, in stroškov, ki jih je revidirala skupina Mazars, razvidno, da vsak let, ki ga opravi družba Ryanair, ob upoštevanju prilagoditev stopenj, do katerih je družba upravičena, in stroškov storitev trženja v prvih dveh letih ustvarja izgubo za letališče.
The Commission highlights an inconsistency in France's response, which claims that the aid amount to be subject to a compatibility analysis is first EUR 932649 (p. 26) and then EUR 980.
Povečanje tržnega deleža nizkocenovnih prevoznikov z 1,5 % leta 1992 na 45,94 % leta 2013.
France explains that an impact study conducted by the CCIMP concluded that the airport's cargo activities accounted for 582 jobs in 2000 and 614 jobs in 2009.
Upravljanje in gradnjo letališke infrastrukture je treba šele od datuma sodbe Aéroports de Paris (12. decembra 2000) obravnavati kot nalogo, ki spada na področje nadzora državnih pomoči (glej uvodno izjavo (228)).
France explains that cargo traffic increased by 20,86 % between 2005 and 2010, and totalled 52179 tonnes in 2010.
Do te sodbe se letališča niso štela za podjetja v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe.
The agreement concluded between the CCIMP and the Marseille Provence Métropole Urban Community stipulated that the public authority's contribution was set in line with the investment programmes proposed by Marseille Provence Airport and accepted by the authority, that the funds were strictly intended to cover expenditure validated in this way, that the annual public contribution was limited to the expenditure actually incurred by the airport in the year, that each call for funds was to be accompanied by a summary statement of the expenditure, and that the CCIMP was to keep at the authority's disposal all the invoices for the work.
Prejela je tudi druge pripombe družbe Ryanair z dne 13. aprila 2012, 10. aprila 2013, 20. decembra 2013, 17. januarja 2014 in 30. januarja 2014.