natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Italian Republic shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until the aid referred to in Article 1 has been fully recovered.
Članica Komisije
At the Commission’s request, it shall immediately submit information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Sklep Komisije z dne 20. februarja 2014 o državni pomoči SA.35843 (2012/NN) – Italija – Nadomestilo za opravljanje javne službe za Buonotourist (UL C 156, 23.5.2014, str. 51).
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiary
Komisija opozarja, da imajo v skladu s členom 15 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1) pooblastila Komisije zahtevati vračilo pomoči desetletni zastaralni rok, ki začne teči na dan, ko je dodeljena nezakonita pomoč upravičencu kot individualna pomoč ali kot pomoč v okviru sheme pomoči.
Article 5
Kakršen koli ukrep glede nezakonite pomoči, ki ga sprejme Komisija ali država članica na zahtevo Komisije, prekine zastaralni rok.
This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 1191/69 z dne 26. junija 1969 o ukrepanju držav članic glede obveznosti javne službe v železniškem in cestnem prometu ter prometu po celinskih plovnih poteh (UL L 156, 28.6.1969, str. 1).
Done at Brussels, 19 January 2015.
Navedeni znesek je torej nadomestil prvotni zahtevek družbe Buonotourist za nadomestilo v višini 5 567 582,57 EUR.
For the Commission
Legge Regionale 25 gennaio 1983, n. 16 Interventi regionali in materia di servizi di trasporto pubblico locale per viaggiatori (Regionalni ukrepi za storitve lokalnega potniškega prevoza), na voljo na spletni povezavi: http://jtest.ittig.cnr.it:8080/cocoon/regioneCampania/xhtml?css=4&doc=/db/nir/RegioneCampania/1983/urn_nir_regione.campania_legge_1983-01-25n16&datafine=19830205
The Commission recalls that, pursuant to Article 15 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1), the powers of the Commission to recover aid are subject to a limitation period of 10 years, beginning on the day on which the unlawful aid is awarded to the beneficiary either as individual aid or as aid under an aid scheme.
Namesto stroškom, ki bi nastali z uporabo najugodnejše obstoječe tarife ali tarife, ki bi jo podjetje uporabilo, če bi poslovalo na komercialni osnovi.
Any action taken by the Commission or by a Member State, acting at the request of the Commission, with regard to the unlawful aid interrupts the limitation period.
Namesto stroški, ki so dejansko nastali po obvezni tarifi.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 of 26 June 1969 on action by Member States concerning the obligations inherent in the concept of a public service in transport by rail, road and inland waterway (OJ L 156, 28.6.1969, p. 1).
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, EU:C:2003:415.
Article 4(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 states that: ‘It shall be for transport undertakings to apply to the competent authorities of the Member States for the termination in whole or in part of any public service obligation where such obligation entails economic disadvantages for them’.
Uredba (ES) št. 1370/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o javnih storitvah železniškega in cestnega potniškega prevoza ter o razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 1191/69 in št. 1107/70 (UL L 315, 3.12.2007, str. 1).
Article 6(3) reads: ‘The competent authorities of the Member States shall take decisions within one year of the date on which the application is lodged as regards obligations to operate or to carry, and within six months as regards tariff obligations.
Obrazci E (Modelli E) so dokumenti na podlagi računovodskih izkazov družbe, ki vsebujejo informacije, potrebne za letni izračun javnega prispevka.
The right to compensation shall arise on the date of the decision by the competent authorities…’.
Zadeva C-527/12, Komisija proti Nemčiji, EU:C:2014:2193, točka 56 in navedena sodna praksa.
That sum therefore replaced the original claim for compensation by Buonotourist of EUR 5 567 582,57.
Glej tudi zadevo C-119/05, Lucchini, EU:C:2007:434, točka 59, opisano v uvodni izjavi 94.
Legge Regionale 25 gennaio 1983, n.
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, EU:C:2003:415, točki 87 in 88.
16 Interventi regionali in materia di servizi di trasporto pubblico locale per viaggiatori (Regional measures for local passenger transport services) available at: http://jtest.ittig.cnr.it:8080/cocoon/regioneCampania/xhtml?css=4&doc=/db/nir/RegioneCampania/1983/urn_nir_regione.campania_legge_1983-01-25n16&datafine=19830205
Zadeva C-172/03, Heiser, EU:C:2005:130, točka 55.
Instead of the difference between, on the one hand, the product of the anticipated number of units of measure of transport and — either the most favourable existing rate which might be claimed by users if the obligation in question did not exist or — where there is no such rate, the rate which the undertaking, operating on a commercial basis and taking into account both the costs of the operation in question and the state of the market, would have applied.
Zadeva T-157/01, Danske Busvognmænd, EU:T:2004:76, točke 77 do 79.
Instead of the product of the actual number of units of measure of transport and the rate imposed for the period under consideration.
Zadeva C-504/07, Associação Nacional de Transportadores Rodoviários de Pesados de Passageiros (Antrop) in drugi proti Conselho de Ministros, Companhia Carris de Ferro de Lisboa SA (Carris) in Sociedade de Transportes Colectivos do Porto SA (STCP), EU:C:2009:290.
Instead of the costs which would be incurred applying either the most favourable existing rate or the rate which the undertaking would have applied if operating on a commercial basis.
Zadeva C-156/77, Komisija proti Belgiji, EU:C:1978:180, točka 10.
Instead of the costs actually incurred under the obligatory rate.
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 1107/70 z dne 4. junija 1970 o dodeljevanju pomoči v železniškem in cestnem prevozu ter prevozu po celinskih plovnih poteh (UL L 130, 15.6.1970, str. 1).
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, [2003] EU:C:2003:415.
Zadeva C-334/07 P, Komisija proti Freistaat Sachsen, EU:C:2008:709, točke 50 do 53; zadeva T-3/09, Italija proti Komisiji, EU:T:2011:27, točka 60.
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 1).
Kot je na primer škodno dejanje ali neupravičena obogatitev.
Modelli E, namely the documents based on the accounts of the company containing the information necessary for the annual calculation of the public contribution.
Združene zadeve C-106/87 do C-120/87, Asteris AE in drugi proti Grčiji in EGS, EU:C:1988:457.
Case C-527/12 Commission v Germany, EU:C:2014/2193, paragraph 56 and the case-law cited.
Glej Odločbo Komisije z dne 16. junija 2004 o državni pomoči N 304/2003 – Nizozemska – Pomoč v korist Akzo Nobel za zmanjšanje števila prevozov klora, povzetek v UL C 81, 2.4.2005, str. 4; glej tudi Odločbo Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2006 o državni pomoči N 575/2005 – Nizozemska – Pomoč za premestitev družbe za razgradnjo avtomobilov Steenbergen, povzetek v UL C 80, 13.4.2007, str. 1.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, [2003] EU:C:2003:415, paragraphs 87 and 88.
Glej prejšnjo opombo, točka 61.
Case C-172/03 Heiser EU:C:2005:130, paragraph 55.
Mnenje z dne 28. aprila 2005 v združenih zadevah C-346/03 in C-529/03, Atzori, EU:C:2005:256, točka 198.
Case T-157/01 Danske Busvognmænd, [2004] EU:T:2004:76, paragraphs 77 to 79.
Zadeva T-384/08, Elliniki Nafpigokataskevastiki in drugi proti Komisiji, EU:T:2011:650, in zadeva T-565/08, Corsica Ferries France proti Komisiji, EU:T:2012:415, točke 23 in 114 ter 120 do 131.
Case C-504/07 Associação Nacional de Transportadores Rodoviários de Pesados de Passageiros (Antrop) and Others v Conselho de Ministros, Companhia Carris de Ferro de Lisboa SA (Carris) and Sociedade de Transportes Colectivos do Porto SA (STCP), [2009] EU:C:2009:290.
Po analogiji glej tudi zadevo C-111/10, Komisija proti Svetu, EU:C:2013:785, točka 44.
Case 156/77 Commission v Belgium, [1978] EU:C:1978:180, paragraph 10.
Zadeva C-70/72, Komisija proti Nemčiji, Recueil 1973, str. 813, točka 13.
Regulation (EEC) No 1107/70 of the Council of 4 June 1970 on the granting of aids for transport by rail, road and inland waterway (OJ L 130, 15.6.1970, p. 1).
Združene zadeve C-278/92, C-279/92 in C-280/92, Španija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1994, str.
The Commission refers in this respect to the reasoning developed in recitals 307 to 313 of its Decision 2011/3/EU of 24 February 2010 concerning public transport service contracts between the Danish Ministry of Transport and Danske Statsbaner (Case C 41/08 (ex NN 35/08)) (OJ L 7, 11.1.2011, p. 1).
I-4103, točka 75.
That Decision was annulled by the General Court in Case T-92/11 Jørgen Andersen v European Commission, [2013] EU:T:2013:143, and an appeal against that judgment is currently pending before the Court of Justice in Case C-303/13 P. The outcome of that appeal is not relevant for the outcome of the present case, since the General Court confirmed in the judgment under appeal that it is the date on which the effects of the disbursed aid occurred which determines which set of rules applies.
Zadeva C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji, Recueil 1999, str.
In this case the aid was paid on 21 December 2012, so the rules, principles and criteria for assessing the compatibility of state aid which are in force on the date on which the Commission takes its Decision should be applied (see paragraph 39 of that judgment).
I-3671, točki 64 in 65.
Case C-334/07 P Commission v Freistaat Sachsen, [2008] EU:C:2008:709, paragraphs 50 to 53; Case T-3/09 Italy v Commission, [2011] EU:T:2011:27, paragraph 60.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
For example, tort or unjust enrichment.
Glej člen 14(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999.
Joined Cases 106 to 120/87, Asteris and others v Greece and EEC, [1988] EU:C:1988:457.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
See Commission Decision of 16 June 2004 on Dutch aid in favour of Akzo Nobel in order to minimise chlorine transports (Case N 304/2003), summary notice in OJ C 81, 2.4.2005, p. 4; See also Commission Decision of 20 December 2006 on Dutch aid for relocation of car dismantling company Steenbergen (Case N 575/2005), summary notice in OJ C 80, 13.4.2007, p. 1.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 271/2008 z dne 30. januarja 2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 82, 25.3.2008, str. 1).
Case C-119/05 Lucchini, EU:C:2007:434, paragraph 59.
V skladu s tem je sodišče Consiglio di Stato v sodbi št. 5650/2012 z dne 7. novembra 2012 dodatno nadomestilo, ki ga je morala regija plačati družbi Buonotourist, ocenilo na 1 111 572 EUR in odločilo, da se plačilo tega zneska izvede do 7. decembra 2012.
Ibid, paragraph 61.
Regija je navedeni znesek družbi Buonotourist plačala 21. decembra 2012.
Opinion of 28 April in Joined Cases C-346/03 and C-529/03 Atzori, EU:C:2005:256, paragraph 198.
Regija je obveznost javne službe družbi Buonotourist naložila s koncesijskim aktom leta 1972/1973, te obveznosti pa so bile obnovljene vsako leto do leta 2003.
See also, by analogy, Case C-111/10 Commission v Council, EU:C:2013:785, paragraph 44.
V vzorčni koncesijski pogodbi iz leta 1972, na podlagi katere je družba Buonotourist domnevno opravljala zadevne storitve prevoza, v vsakem primeru ni bilo določeno plačilo finančnega nadomestila.
Case C-70/72 Commission v Germany, [1973] ECR 813, paragraph 13.
Družba Buonotourist se je strinjala, da bo storitve opravljala pod pogoji, določenimi s koncesijo, na lastno odgovornost.
Case C-75/97 Belgium v Commission, [1999] ECR I-3671, paragraphs 64 and 65.
Pravica do nadomestila se pridobi na dan odločitve pristojnih organov […].“
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1).
Komisija se v zvezi s tem sklicuje na argumente iz uvodnih izjav 307 do 313 svojega Sklepa 2011/3/EU z dne 24. februarja 2010 o pogodbah o izvajanju javne službe prevoza, ki sta jih sklenila dansko ministrstvo za promet in družba Danske Statsbaner (Državna pomoč C 41/08 (ex NN 35/08)) (UL L 7, 11.1.2011, str. 1).
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1084
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/1084
approving on behalf of the European Union certain amendments to Annexes II, V, VII and VIII to the Agreement between the European Community and New Zealand on sanitary measures applicable to trade in live animals and animal products
o sprejetju, v imenu Evropske unije, nekaterih sprememb prilog II, V, VII in VIII k Sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Novo Zelandijo o sanitarnih ukrepih, ki veljajo za trgovino z živimi živalmi in živalskimi proizvodi
(notified under document C(2015) 797)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2015) 797)
Having regard to Council Decision 97/132/EC of 17 December 1996 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and New Zealand on sanitary measures applicable to trade in live animals and animal products [1], and in particular the third paragraph of Article 3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 97/132/ES z dne 17. decembra 1996 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Novo Zelandijo o sanitarnih ukrepih, ki veljajo za trgovino z živimi živalmi in živalskimi proizvodi [1], zlasti tretjega odstavka člena 3 Sklepa,
The Agreement between the European Community and New Zealand on sanitary measures applicable to trade in live animals and animal products (‘the Agreement’) provides for the possibility of recognising equivalence for sanitary measures after the exporting Party has objectively demonstrated that its measures achieve the importing Party's appropriate level of protection (‘the Parties’).
Sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Novo Zelandijo o sanitarnih ukrepih, ki se uporabljajo za trgovino z živimi živalmi in živalskimi proizvodi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum), določa možnost priznanja enakovrednosti sanitarnih ukrepov, če pogodbenica izvoznica objektivno dokaže, da njeni ukrepi dosegajo ustrezno raven zaščite, kot jo ima pogodbenica uvoznica (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pogodbenici).
The Agreement was duly approved by Decision 97/132/EC which also provides that amendments to the Annexes thereto which are the result of the recommendations by the Joint Management Committee should be adopted according to the procedure referred to in Council Directive 72/462/EEC [2].
Sporazum je bil ustrezno odobren s Sklepom 97/132/ES, ki prav tako določa, da bi bilo treba spremembe v prilogah k navedenemu sporazumu, ki so rezultat priporočil Skupnega upravljalnega odbora, sprejeti v skladu s postopkom iz Direktive Sveta 72/462/EGS [2].
Directive 72/462/EEC was repealed by Council Directive 2004/68/EC [3].
Direktiva 72/462/EGS je bila razveljavljena z Direktivo Sveta 2004/68/ES [3].
Recital 10 of Directive 2004/68/EC states that the public health and official control rules which apply to meat and meat products by virtue of Directive 72/462/EEC have been replaced by those of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
V uvodni izjavi 10 Direktive 2004/68/ES je navedeno, da so bile določbe o javnem zdravju in uradnih kontrolah za meso in mesne proizvode iz Direktive 72/462/EGS nadomeščene z določbami iz Uredbe (ES) št. 854/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].
That recital also states that the other rules of Directive 72/462/EEC have been replaced by Council Directive 2002/99/EC [5] and by Directive 2004/68/EC.
V navedeni uvodni izjavi je prav tako navedeno, da so bile ostale določbe iz Direktive 72/462/EGS nadomeščene z Direktivo Sveta 2002/99/ES [5] in Direktivo 2004/68/ES.
New Zealand restructured its competent authorities in 2010 and the new competent authority is now the Ministry for Primary Industries.
Nova Zelandija je leta 2010 prestrukturirala svoje pristojne organe in zdaj je novi pristojni organ Ministry for Primary Industries (ministrstvo za primarne industrije).
The Union proposed a slight amendment to the definition of the roles of the Member States and the Commission.
Unija je predlagala majhno spremembo opredelitve vlog držav članic in Komisije.
The Parties recommended updating Annex II to the Agreement to reflect these changes.
Pogodbenici sta zaradi upoštevanja teh sprememb priporočili posodobitev Priloge II k Sporazumu.
The Parties recommended making changes to the definitions of the different equivalence status, notably on the ‘Yes-1’ status in the Glossary of Annex V to the Agreement, where a link to the model attestation in Section 1(a) of Annex VII thereto on certification was made.
Priporočili sta spremembe opredelitev različnih statusov enakovrednosti, zlasti statusa „Da-1“ v glosarju v Prilogi V k Sporazumu, kjer je povezava na vzorec potrdila iz oddelka 1(a) Priloge VII k Sporazumu o certificiranju.
The Parties also wished to provide for a legal basis for the Union to use the integrated electronic system of the Union provided for in Commission Decision 2003/24/EC [6] (‘TRACES’) for laying down the import certificates for ‘Yes-1’ products from New Zealand.
Pogodbenici sta prav tako želeli zagotoviti pravno podlago, da bo Unija lahko uporabila integrirani elektronski sistem Unije iz Odločbe Komisije 2003/24/ES [6] („TRACES“) za določanje uvoznih spričeval za proizvode „Da-1“ iz Nove Zelandije.
This use will allow for more rapid certification updates, as well as for further use of electronic certification.
To bo omogočilo hitrejše posodobitve certificiranja ter nadaljnjo uporabo elektronskega certificiranja.
The Parties further recommended including definitions for TRACES and the electronic system of New Zealand (E-cert) and updating the names of certain animal diseases listed in the Glossary of Annex V to the Agreement.
Pogodbenici sta nadalje priporočili vključitev opredelitev TRACES in elektronskega sistema Nove Zelandije (E-cert) ter posodobitev imen nekaterih živalskih bolezni, navedenih v glosarju v Prilogi V k Sporazumu.
New Zealand carried out a new risk assessment for the import of bovine semen and embryos.
Nova Zelandija je izvedla novo oceno tveganja za uvoz semena in zarodkov goveda.
As a result, epizootic haemorrhagic disease is no longer considered a disease of significance for bovine semen and New Zealand has removed its import conditions.
Na podlagi tega se epizootska hemoragična bolezen ne šteje več za hujšo bolezen za seme goveda, in Nova Zelandija je odpravila pogoje za njegov uvoz.
Furthermore, the conditions on Q-fever and bovine viral diarrhoea (type II) were revised by New Zealand.
Poleg tega je Nova Zelandija spremenila pogoje v zvezi z vročico Q in bovino virusno diarejo (tipa II).
The Parties therefore recommended amending Chapter 1 on ‘Semen’ and Chapter 2 on ‘Embryos’ of Section 1 and Chapter 28 on ‘Miscellaneous certification provisions’ of Section 5 of Annex V to the Agreement.
Pogodbenici sta zato priporočili spremembo poglavja 1 „Seme“ in poglavja 2 „Zarodki“ v oddelku 1 ter poglavja 28 „Razne določbe o certificiranju“ iz oddelka 5 Priloge V k Sporazumu.
The Parties furthermore recommended deleting, in Chapter 1 on ‘Semen’ of Section 1, the previous ‘actions’ for New Zealand exports to the Union and introducing a new ‘action’ requesting the Union to consider reviewing whether testing of semen for infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing methodology approved by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), which provides an equivalent assurance to IBR disease freedom.
Pogodbenici sta poleg tega priporočili, da se v poglavju 1 „Seme“ v oddelku 1 črtajo predhodni „ukrepi“ za izvoz Nove Zelandije v Unijo ter uvede nov „ukrep“, ki od Unije zahteva, naj razmisli o pregledu, ali testiranje semena na infekciozni bovini rinotraheitis (IBR) z verižno reakcijo s polimerazo (PCR), metodologijo testiranja, ki jo je odobrila Svetovna organizacija za zdravje živali (OIE), enakovredno zagotavlja, da živali niso okužene z IBR.
It is therefore appropriate to amend the special conditions in Chapters 1 and 2 of Section 1 and the relevant certification provisions in Chapter 28 of Section 5 of Annex V to the Agreement.
Zato je ustrezno spremeniti posebne pogoje iz poglavij 1 in 2 oddelka 1 ter zadevne določbe o certificiranju iz poglavja 28 oddelka 5 Priloge V k Sporazumu.
In relation to live bees, the Union has adopted new legislation for the listing of Member States or regions free of varroosis in bees and to which trade restrictions apply.
V zvezi z živimi čebelami je Unija sprejela novo zakonodajo za sestavo seznama držav članic in regij, prostih varooze čebel in za katere se uporabljajo omejitve trgovine.
These apply also to imports from New Zealand, as it is not free of that disease.
Te se uporabljajo tudi za uvoz iz Nove Zelandije, saj ni prosta navedene bolezni.
The Parties recommended adding, in Chapter 3 on ‘Live animals’ of Section 1 of Annex V to the Agreement, for live bees and bumble bees including ‘bee/bumble bee germplasm’ set out under special conditions, an export restriction to Member States or regions thereof listed in the Annex to Commission Implementing Decision 2013/503/EU [7].
Pogodbenici sta priporočili, da se v poglavju 3 „Žive živali“ v oddelku 1 Priloge V k Sporazumu za žive čebele in čmrlje, vključno z „genskim materialom čebel/čmrljev“, pod posebnimi pogoji doda omejitev izvoza v države članice ali njihove regije s seznama v Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu Komisije 2013/503/EU [7].
The Union has also amended its import conditions for American foul brood in Commission Decision 2010/270/EU [8].
Unija je v Sklepu Komisije 2010/270/EU [8] spremenila tudi svoje uvozne pogoje za hudo gnilobo čebelje zalege.
The Parties therefore also recommended amending Chapter 28 on ‘Miscellaneous certification provisions’ of Section 5 of Annex V to the Agreement.
Pogodbenici sta zato priporočili tudi spremembo poglavja 28 „Razne določbe o certificiranju“ v oddelku 5 Priloge V k Sporazumu.
For the reasons of consistency with Chapter 4.B on ‘Fresh Poultry Meat’ of Section 2 of Annex V to the Agreement, the Parties agreed to amend the Title of Section 2 in Annex V thereto, by including the word ‘fresh’ before poultry meat.
Zaradi skladnosti s poglavjem 4.B „Sveže perutninsko meso“ v oddelku 2 Priloge V k Sporazumu sta se pogodbenici dogovorili o spremembi naslova oddelka 2 v Prilogi V k Sporazumu, in sicer z vključitvijo besede „sveže“ pred besedama „perutninsko meso“.
New Zealand conducted a risk assessment on porcine respiratory reproductive syndrome (PRRS) and amended its import conditions for pig meat.
Nova Zelandija je izvedla oceno tveganja za prašičji reprodukcijski in respiratorni sindrom (PRRS) ter spremenila svoje uvozne pogoje za prašičje meso.
The Parties therefore recommended adding PRRS under the special conditions of Chapter 4.A on ‘Fresh Meat’ of Section 2 of Annex V to the Agreement, on animal health, pigs for exports from the Union to New Zealand and laying down the relevant attestations in Chapter 28 of Section 5 of Annex V thereto.
Pogodbenici sta zato priporočili, da se za prašiče za izvoz iz Unije v Novo Zelandijo med posebne pogoje v poglavju 4.A „Sveže meso“ v oddelku 2 Priloge V k Sporazumu v zvezi z zdravjem živali vključi PRRS in določijo ustrezna potrdila v poglavju 28 oddelka 5 Priloge V k Sporazumu.