natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The detailed description referred to in point (d) of paragraph 1 shall ensure awareness of the reporting person concerning the exceptional cases in which confidentiality of data may not be ensured, including where the disclosure of data is a necessary and proportionate obligation required under Union or national law in the context of investigations or subsequent judicial proceedings or to safeguard the freedoms of others including the right of defence of the reported person, and in each case subject to appropriate safeguards under such laws.
Podroben opis iz točke (d) odstavka 1 zagotavlja, da se oseba, ki poroča, zaveda izrednih primerov, ko zaupnost podatkov morda ni zagotovljena, vključno s primeri, ko je razkritje podatkov potrebna in sorazmerna obveznost v skladu s pravom Unije ali nacionalnim pravom v okviru preiskav ali poznejših sodnih postopkov ali za zaščito svoboščin drugih, vključno s pravico prijavljene osebe do obrambe, pri čemer v vsakem primeru veljajo ustrezni zaščitni ukrepi v skladu s takimi zakoni.
Member States shall ensure that competent authorities establish independent and autonomous communication channels, which are both secure and ensure confidentiality, for receiving and following-up the reporting of infringements (‘dedicated communication channels’).
Države članice zagotovijo, da pristojni organi vzpostavijo neodvisne in avtonomne komunikacijske kanale, ki so varni in zagotavljajo zaupnost, za prejemanje in nadaljnje spremljanje poročil o kršitvah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: posebni komunikacijski kanali).
Dedicated communication channels shall be considered independent and autonomous, provided that they meet all of the following criteria:
Posebni komunikacijski kanali se štejejo za neodvisne in avtonomne, če izpolnjujejo vsa naslednja merila:
they are separated from general communication channels of the competent authority, including those through which the competent authority communicates internally and with third parties in its ordinary course of business;
so ločeni od splošnih komunikacijskih kanalov pristojnega organa, vključno s tistimi, prek katerih pristojni organ komunicira interno in s tretjimi osebami med običajnim poslovanjem;
they are designed, set up and operated in a manner that ensures the completeness, integrity and confidentiality of the information and prevents access to non-authorised staff members of the competent authority;
so zasnovani, vzpostavljeni in delujejo na način, ki zagotavlja popolnost, celovitost in zaupnost informacij ter preprečuje dostop nepooblaščenemu osebju pristojnega organa;
they enable the storage of durable information in accordance with Article 7 to allow for further investigations.
omogočajo shranjevanje informacij v trajni obliki v skladu s členom 7, da se omogočijo nadaljnje preiskave.
The dedicated communication channels shall allow for reporting of actual or potential infringements in at least all of the following ways:
Posebni komunikacijski kanali omogočajo poročanje o dejanskih ali morebitnih kršitvah na vsaj vse naslednje načine:
written report of infringements in electronic or paper format;
pisno poročilo o kršitvah v elektronski ali papirni obliki;
oral report of infringements through telephone lines, whether recorded or unrecorded;
ustno poročilo o kršitvah prek telefonskih linij ne glede na to, ali se pogovori snemajo ali ne;
physical meeting with dedicated staff members of the competent authority.
osebno srečanje s posebnim osebjem pristojnega organa.
The competent authority shall provide the information referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 4 to the reporting person before receiving the report of infringement, or at the moment of receiving it at the latest.
Pristojni organ zagotovi informacije iz odstavka 2 člena 4 osebi, ki poroča, pred prejemom poročila o kršitvi ali najpozneje ob njegovem prejemu.
Competent authorities shall ensure that a report of infringement received by means other than dedicated communication channels referred to in this Article is promptly forwarded without modification to the dedicated staff members of the competent authority by using dedicated communication channels.
Pristojni organi zagotovijo, da se poročilo o kršitvi, ki ni prejeto prek posebnih komunikacijskih kanalov iz tega člena, nemudoma in brez spremembe posreduje posebnemu osebju pristojnega organa prek posebnih komunikacijskih kanalov.
Record-keeping of reports received
Vodenje evidenc o prejetih poročilih
Member States shall ensure that competent authorities keep records of every report of infringement received.
Države članice zagotovijo, da pristojni organi vodijo evidence o vsakem prejetem poročilu o kršitvi.
Competent authorities shall promptly acknowledge the receipt of written reports of infringements to the postal or electronic address indicated by the reporting person, unless the reporting person explicitly requested otherwise or the competent authority reasonably believes that acknowledging receipt of a written report would jeopardise the protection of the reporting person's identity.
Pristojni organi takoj potrdijo prejem pisnih poročil o kršitvah na poštni ali elektronski naslov, ki ga navede oseba, ki poroča, razen če slednja izrecno zahteva drugače ali če pristojni organ utemeljeno meni, da bi potrditev prejema pisnega poročila ogrozila varstvo identitete osebe, ki poroča.
Where a recorded telephone line is used for reporting of infringements, the competent authority shall have the right to document the oral reporting in the form of:
Če se za poročanje o kršitvah uporabi telefonska linija, pri kateri se pogovori snemajo, ima pristojni organ pravico, da ustno poročilo evidentira v obliki:
an audio recording of the conversation in a durable and retrievable form; or
zvočnega zapisa pogovora v trajni in dostopni obliki ali
a complete and accurate transcript of the conversation prepared by the dedicated staff members of the competent authority.
popolnega in točnega zapisa pogovora, ki ga pripravi posebno osebje pristojnega organa.
In cases where the reporting person has disclosed its identity, the competent authority shall offer the possibility to the reporting person to check, rectify and agree with the transcript of the call by signing it.
Če oseba, ki poroča, razkrije svojo identiteto, ji pristojni organ omogoči, da pregleda, popravi in se strinja z zapisom klica tako, da ga podpiše.
Where an unrecorded telephone line is used for reporting of infringements, the competent authority shall have the right to document the oral reporting in the form of accurate minutes of the conversation prepared by the dedicated staff members of the competent authority.
Če se za poročanje o kršitvah uporabi telefonska linija, pri kateri se pogovori ne snemajo, ima pristojni organ pravico, da ustno poročilo evidentira v obliki točnega zapisnika pogovora, ki ga pripravi posebno osebje pristojnega organa.
In cases where the reporting person has disclosed its identity, the competent authority shall offer the possibility to the reporting person to check, rectify and agree with the minutes of the call by signing them.
Če oseba, ki poroča, razkrije svojo identiteto, ji pristojni organ omogoči, da pregleda, popravi in se strinja z zapisnikom klica tako, da ga podpiše.
Where a person requests a physical meeting with the dedicated staff members of the competent authority for reporting an infringement according to Article 6(3)(c), competent authorities shall ensure that complete and accurate records of the meeting are kept in a durable and retrievable form.
Če oseba zaradi poročanja o kršitvi v skladu s členom 6(3)(c) zahteva osebno srečanje s posebnim osebjem pristojnega organa, pristojni organi zagotovijo, da se vodijo popolne in točne evidence o srečanju v trajni in dostopni obliki.
A competent authority shall have the right to document the records of the physical meeting in the form of:
Pristojni organ ima pravico, da osebno srečanje evidentira v obliki:
accurate minutes of the meeting prepared by the dedicated staff members of the competent authority.
točnega zapisnika srečanja, ki ga pripravi posebno osebje pristojnega organa.
In cases where the reporting person has disclosed its identity, the competent authority shall offer the possibility to the reporting person to check, rectify and agree with the minutes of the meeting by signing them.
Če oseba, ki poroča, razkrije svojo identiteto, ji pristojni organ omogoči, da pregleda, popravi in se strinja z zapisnikom srečanja tako, da ga podpiše.
Protection of persons working under a contract of employment
Zaščita oseb, ki delajo na podlagi pogodbe o zaposlitvi
Member States shall put in place procedures ensuring effective exchange of information and cooperation between competent authorities and any other relevant authority involved in the protection of persons working under a contract of employment who report infringements of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 to the competent authority or are accused of such infringements, against retaliation, discrimination or other types of unfair treatment, arising due to or in connection with reporting of infringements of Regulation (EU) No 596/2014.
Države članice uvedejo postopke, ki zagotavljajo učinkovito izmenjavo informacij in sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi in katerim koli drugim zadevnim organom, vključenim v zaščito oseb, ki delajo na podlagi pogodbe o zaposlitvi in ki pristojnemu organu poročajo o kršitvah Uredbe (EU) št. 596/2014 ali so obtožene takih kršitev, pred povračilnimi ukrepi, diskriminacijo ali drugimi vrstami nepravične obravnave, ki so posledica poročanja o kršitvah Uredbe (EU) št. 596/2014 ali so povezane z njim.
The procedures set out in paragraph 1 shall ensure at least the following:
Postopki iz odstavka 1 zagotavljajo vsaj naslednje:
reporting persons have access to comprehensive information and advice on the remedies and procedures available under national law to protect them against unfair treatment, including on the procedures for claiming pecuniary compensation;
da imajo osebe, ki poročajo, dostop do izčrpnih informacij in nasvetov glede pravnih sredstev in postopkov, ki so v skladu z nacionalnim pravom na voljo za zaščito pred nepravično obravnavo, med drugim tudi glede postopkov za vložitev zahtevka za denarno nadomestilo;
reporting persons have access to effective assistance from competent authorities before any relevant authority involved in their protection against unfair treatment, including by certifying the condition of whistle-blower of the reporting person in employment disputes.
da imajo osebe, ki poročajo, dostop do učinkovite pomoči pristojnih organov pred katerim koli zadevnim organom, vključenim v zaščito teh oseb pred nepravično obravnavo, vključno s potrditvijo statusa notranjega informatorja osebe, ki poroča, v sporih glede zaposlovanja.
Protection procedures for personal data
Zaščitni postopki za osebne podatke
Member States shall ensure that competent authorities store the records referred to in Article 7 in a confidential and secure system.
Države članice zagotovijo, da pristojni organi hranijo evidence iz člena 7 v zaupnem in varnem sistemu.
Access to the system referred to in paragraph 1 shall be subject to restrictions ensuring that the data stored therein is only available to staff members of the competent authority for whom access to that data is necessary to perform their professional duties.
Dostop do sistema iz odstavka 1 je omejen, kar zagotavlja, da so podatki, shranjeni v sistemu, na voljo le osebju pristojnega organa, ki mora dostopati do navedenih podatkov, da bi lahko opravilo svoje poklicne dolžnosti.
Transmission of data inside and outside of the competent authority
Posredovanje podatkov znotraj in zunaj pristojnega organa
Member States shall ensure that competent authorities have in place adequate procedures for the transmission of personal data of the reporting person and reported person inside and outside of the competent authority.
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo pristojni organi uvedene ustrezne postopke za posredovanje osebnih podatkov osebe, ki poroča, in prijavljene osebe znotraj in zunaj pristojnega organa.
Member States shall ensure that the transmission of data related to a report of infringement within or outside the competent authority does not reveal, directly or indirectly, the identity of the reporting person or reported person or any other references to circumstances that would allow the identity of the reporting person or reported person to be deduced, unless such transmission is in accordance with the confidentiality regime referred to in Article 5(1)(d).
Države članice zagotovijo, da se pri posredovanju podatkov, povezanih s poročilom o kršitvi, znotraj ali zunaj pristojnega organa neposredno ali posredno ne razkrije identiteta osebe, ki poroča, ali prijavljene osebe ali kakršna koli druga navedba okoliščin, na podlagi katere bi bilo mogoče sklepati o identiteti osebe, ki poroča, ali prijavljene osebe, razen če je tako posredovanje v skladu z ureditvijo zaupnosti iz člena 5(1)(d).
Procedures for the protection of the reported persons
Postopki za zaščito prijavljenih oseb
Where the identity of reported persons is not known to the public, the Member State concerned shall ensure that their identity is protected at least in the same manner as for persons that are under investigation by the competent authority.
Če identiteta prijavljenih oseb javnosti ni znana, zadevna država članica zagotovi, da je njihova identiteta zaščitena vsaj na enak način kot za osebe, ki jih preiskuje pristojni organ.
The procedures set out Article 9 shall also apply for the protection of the identity of the reported persons.
Postopki iz člena 9 se uporabljajo tudi za zaščito identitete prijavljenih oseb.
Review of the procedures by competent authorities
Pregled postopkov s strani pristojnih organov
Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities review their procedures for receiving reports of infringements and their follow-up regularly, and at least once every two years.
Države članice zagotovijo, da njihovi pristojni organi redno pregledujejo svoje postopke za prejemanje in nadaljnje spremljanje poročil o kršitvah, in sicer vsaj enkrat na dve leti.
In reviewing such procedures competent authorities shall take account of their experience and that of other competent authorities and adapt their procedures accordingly and in line with market and technological developments.
Pristojni organi pri pregledu takih postopkov upoštevajo lastne izkušnje in izkušnje drugih pristojnih organov ter ustrezno prilagodijo svoje postopke, tudi v skladu z razvojem trga in tehnološkim razvojem.
Member States shall adopt and publish, by 3 July 2016 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive.
Države članice najpozneje do 3. julija 2016 sprejmejo in objavijo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo.
They shall apply those provisions from 3 July 2016.
Navedene predpise uporabljajo od 3. julija 2016.
OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 1.
UL L 173, 12.6.2014, str. 1.
OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.
UL L 281, 23.11.1995, str. 31.
Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva (EU) 2015/2436 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
A number of amendments should be made to Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
Potrebnih je več sprememb Direktive 2008/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3].
Directive 2008/95/EC has harmonised central provisions of substantive trade mark law which at the time of adoption were considered as most directly affecting the functioning of the internal market by impeding the free movement of goods and the freedom to provide services in the Union.
V Direktivi 2008/95/ES so harmonizirane ključne določbe materialnega prava blagovnih znamk, za katere se je ob sprejetju štelo, da najbolj neposredno vplivajo na delovanje notranjega trga, saj so ovirale prost pretok blaga in svobodo opravljanja storitev v Uniji.
Trade mark protection in the Member States coexists with protection available at Union level through European Union trade marks (‘EU trade marks’) which are unitary in character and valid throughout the Union as laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 [4].
Varstvo blagovne znamke v državah članicah soobstaja z varstvom, ki je na voljo na ravni Unije, na podlagi blagovne znamke Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: blagovne znamke EU), ki uživa enotno zaščito in velja po vsej Uniji, kakor je določeno v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 207/2009 [4].
The coexistence and balance of trade mark systems at national and Union level in fact constitutes a cornerstone of the Union's approach to intellectual property protection.
Hkratni obstoj sistemov blagovnih znamk na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Unije ter ravnotežje med njimi sta dejansko ključnega pomena za pristop Unije do varstva intelektualne lastnine.
Further to the Commission's communication of 16 July 2008 on an industrial property rights strategy for Europe, the Commission carried out a comprehensive evaluation of the overall functioning of the trade mark system in Europe as a whole, covering Union and national levels and the interrelation between the two.
Komisija je v zvezi s svojim sporočilom z dne 16. julija 2008 o strategiji pravic industrijske lastnine za Evropo izvedla obsežno vrednotenje celotnega delovanja sistema blagovnih znamk v Evropi kot celoti, pri čemer je zajela raven Unije in nacionalno raven ter odnos med njima.
In its conclusions of 25 May 2010 on the future revision of the trade mark system in the European Union, the Council called on the Commission to present proposals for the revision of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Directive 2008/95/EC.
Svet je v svojih sklepih z dne 25. maja 2010 o prihodnji reviziji sistema blagovne znamke v Evropski uniji Komisijo pozval, da predloži predloge za revizijo Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 in Direktive 2008/95/ES.
The revision of that Directive should include measures to make it more consistent with Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, which would thus reduce the areas of divergence within the trade mark system in Europe as a whole, while maintaining national trade mark protection as an attractive option for applicants.
Revizija navedene direktive bi morala vključevati ukrepe, ki bi zagotovili večjo skladnost z Uredbo (ES) št. 207/2009, da bi tako zmanjšali število razhajanj, do katerih prihaja v sistemu blagovnih znamk v Evropi kot celoti, obenem pa ohranili varstvo blagovne znamke na nacionalni ravni kot eno od privlačnih možnosti za prijavitelje.
In this context, the complementary relationship between the EU trade mark system and national trade mark systems should be ensured.
V tem smislu bi bilo treba zagotoviti dopolnjevanje med sistemom blagovne znamke EU in nacionalnimi sistemi blagovnih znamk.
The Commission concluded in its communication of 24 May 2011 entitled ‘A single market for intellectual property rights’ that in order to meet increased demands from stakeholders for faster, higher quality, more streamlined trade mark registration systems, which are also more consistent, user friendly, publicly accessible and technologically up to date, there is a necessity to modernise the trade mark system in the Union as a whole and adapt it to the internet era.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu z dne 24. maja 2011 z naslovom „Enotni trg na področju varstva pravic intelektualne lastnine“ ugotovila, da je treba za izpolnitev zahtev deležnikov po hitrejših, kakovostnejših in smotrnejših sistemih registracije blagovnih znamk, ki so doslednejši, prijazni uporabniku, javno dostopni in tehnološko sodobni, modernizirati sistem blagovne znamke v Uniji kot celoti in ga prilagoditi dobi interneta.
Consultation and evaluation for the purpose of this Directive has revealed that, in spite of the previous partial harmonisation of national laws, there remain areas where further harmonisation could have a positive impact on competitiveness and growth.
Med posvetovanji in ocenjevanjem za namene te direktive se je izkazalo, da ne glede na predhodno delno harmonizacijo nacionalnih zakonodaj še vedno obstajajo področja, kjer bi lahko dodatna harmonizacija pozitivno vplivala na konkurenčnost in rast.
In order to serve the objective of fostering and creating a well-functioning internal market and to facilitate acquiring and protecting trade marks in the Union, to the benefit of the growth and the competitiveness of European businesses, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises, it is necessary to go beyond the limited scope of approximation achieved by Directive 2008/95/EC and extend approximation to other aspects of substantive trade mark law governing trade marks protected through registration pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Zaradi spodbujanja in oblikovanja dobro delujočega notranjega trga ter lažje pridobitve in varstva blagovnih znamk v Uniji, kar bi koristilo rasti in konkurenčnosti evropskih podjetij, zlasti malih in srednjih podjetij, je treba preseči omejeni obseg približevanja, ki je bil dosežen z Direktivo 2008/95/ES, in približevanje razširiti na druge vidike materialnega prava blagovnih znamk, ki ureja blagovne znamke, ki so varovane z registracijo, kakor je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 207/2009.
For the purpose of making trade mark registrations throughout the Union easier to obtain and administer, it is essential to approximate not only provisions of substantive law but also procedural rules.
Da bi pridobitev in upravljanje registracije blagovnih znamk v vsej Uniji postalo lažje, je nujno približati ne samo določbe materialnega prava, temveč tudi postopkovna pravila.
Therefore, the principal procedural rules in the area of trade mark registration in the Member States and in the EU trade mark system should be aligned.
Zato bi bilo treba uskladiti glavna postopkovna pravila na področju registracije blagovnih znamk v državah članicah in v sistemu blagovne znamke EU.
As regards procedures under national law, it is sufficient to lay down general principles, leaving the Member States free to establish more specific rules.
V zvezi s postopki nacionalnega prava zadostuje že, da se določijo splošna načela, države članice pa nato same določijo podrobnejša pravila.
It is essential to ensure that registered trade marks enjoy the same protection under the legal systems of all the Member States.
Bistveno je zagotoviti, da registrirane blagovne znamke v pravnih sistemih vseh držav članic uživajo enako varstvo.
In line with the extensive protection granted to EU trade marks which have a reputation in the Union, extensive protection should also be granted at national level to all registered trade marks which have a reputation in the Member State concerned.
Obsežno varstvo, dodeljeno blagovnim znamkam EU, ki imajo ugled v Uniji, bi bilo treba tudi na nacionalni ravni dodeliti vsem registriranim blagovnim znamkam, ki imajo ugled v zadevni državi članici.
This Directive should not deprive the Member States of the right to continue to protect trade marks acquired through use but should take them into account only with regard to their relationship with trade marks acquired by registration.
Ta direktiva državam članicam ne bi smela odvzeti pravice do nadaljnjega varstva blagovnih znamk, pridobljenih z uporabo, temveč bi morala urejati le njihovo razmerje do blagovnih znamk, pridobljenih z registracijo.
Attainment of the objectives of this approximation of laws requires that the conditions for obtaining and continuing to hold a registered trade mark be, in general, identical in all Member States.
Uresničitev ciljev takšnega približevanja zakonodaje zahteva, da so pogoji pridobivanja in ohranjanja registrirane blagovne znamke na splošno enaki v vseh državah članicah.
To this end, it is necessary to list examples of signs which are capable of constituting a trade mark, provided that such signs are capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings.
V ta namen bi bilo treba navesti primere znakov, ki lahko sestavljajo blagovno znamko, pod pogojem, da je zaradi takšnih znakov mogoče razlikovati blago ali storitve enega podjetja od blaga ali storitev drugih podjetij.