natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
TG/8/6 of 17.4.2002
krmni bob
Fodder radish
TG/8/6 z dne 17.4.2002
TG/178/3 of 4.4.2001
oljna redkev
Groundnut/Peanut
TG/178/3 z dne 4.4.2001
TG/93/4 of 9.4.2014
zemeljski orešček/arašid
Turnip rape
TG/93/4 z dne 9.4.2014
TG/185/3 of 17.4.2002
oljna repica
Safflower
TG/185/3 z dne 17.4.2002
TG/134/3 of 12.10.1990
žafranika (barvilni rumenik)
Poppy
TG/134/3 z dne 12.10.1990
TG/166/4 of 9.4.2014
mak
White mustard
TG/166/4 z dne 9.4.2014
TG/179/3 of 4.4.2001
bela gorjušica
Soya bean
TG/179/3 z dne 4.4.2001
TG/80/6 of 1.4.1998
soja
Sorghum
TG/80/6 z dne 1.4.1998
TG/122/4 of 25.3.2015
sirek
Sudan grass
TG/122/4 z dne 25.3.2015
TG 122/4 of 25.3.2015
sudanski sirek
Hybrids resulting from the crossing of Sorghum bicolor and Sorghum sudanense
TG 122/4 z dne 25.3.2015
The text of these guidelines can be found on the UPOV website (www.upov.int).
hibridi, ki izhajajo iz križanja Sorghum bicolor s Sorghum sudanense
PART B
Besedilo teh smernic je na voljo na spletni strani UPOV (www.upov.int).
Allium cepa L.
DEL B
(Cepa group)
Allium cepa L. (skupina čebul)
Allium cepa L.
Allium cepa L. (skupina Aggregatum)
Shallot
zimski luk
TP 46/2 of 1.4.2009 Allium fistulosum L.
TP 161/1 z dne 11.3.2010
Japanese bunching onion or Welsh onion
por
TP 161/1 of 11.3.2010
TP 85/2 z dne 1.4.2009
Leek
česen
TP 85/2 of 1.4.2009
TP 162/1 z dne 25.3.2004
Garlic
drobnjak
TP 162/1 of 25.3.2004
TP 198/2 z dne 11.3.2015
Chives
belušna zelena
TP 198/2 of 11.3.2015
TP 82/1 z dne 13.3.2008
Celery
gomoljna zelena
TP 82/1 of 13.3.2008
TP 74/1 z dne 13.3.2008
Celeriac
špargelj
TP 74/1 of 13.3.2008
TP 130/2 z dne 16.2.2011
Asparagus
rdeča pesa, vključno s cheltenhamsko peso
TP 130/2 of 16.2.2011
TP 60/1 z dne 1.4.2009
Beetroot including Cheltenham beet
mangold
TP 60/1 of 1.4.2009
TP 106/1 z dne 11.3.2015
Spinach beet or Chard
kodrolistni ohrovt
TP 106/1 of 11.3.2015
TP 90/1 z dne 16.2.2011
Curly kale
cvetača
TP 90/1 of 16.2.2011
TP 45/2 z dne 11.3.2010
Cauliflower
brokoli ali kalabrijski brokoli
TP 45/2 of 11.3.2010
TP 151/2 z dne 21.3.2007
Sprouting broccoli or Calabrese
brstični ohrovt
TP 151/2 of 21.3.2007
TP 54/2 z dne 1.12.2005
Brussels sprouts
kolerabica
TP 54/2 of 1.12.2005
TP 65/1 z dne 25.3.2004
Kohlrabi
ohrovt, belo zelje in rdeče zelje
TP 65/1 of 25.3.2004
TP 48/3 z dne 16.2.2011
Savoy cabbage, White cabbage and Red cabbage
kitajski kapus
TP 48/3 of 16.2.2011
TP 105/1 z dne 13.3.2008
Chinese cabbage
čili ali poper
TP 105/1 of 13.3.2008
TP 76/2 z dne 21.3.2007
Chilli or Pepper
kodrolistna endivija in endivija eskariol
TP 76/2 of 21.3.2007
TP 118/3 z dne 19.3.2014
Curled-leaved endive and Plain-leaved endive
industrijska cikorija
TP 118/3 of 19.3.2014
TP 172/2 z dne 1.12.2005
Industrial chicory
korenasti radič
TP 172/2 of 1.12.2005
TP 173/1 z dne 25.3.2004
Witloof chicory
lubenica
TP 173/1 of 25.3.2004
TP 142/2 z dne 19.3.2014
Watermelon
melona
TP 142/2 of 19.3.2014
TP 104/2 z dne 21.3.2007
Melon
kumara in kumarice za vlaganje
TP 104/2 of 21.3.2007
TP 61/2 z dne 13.3.2008
Cucumber and Gherkin
navadna buča
TP 61/2 of 13.3.2008
TP 155/1 z dne 11.3.2015
Gourd
vrtna buča ali bučka
TP 155/1 of 11.3.2015
TP 119/2 z dne 19.3.2014
Marrow or Courgette
artičoka in kardij
TP 119/1rev. of 19.3.2014
TP 184/2 z dne 27.2.2013
Globe artichoke and Cardoon
korenje in krmno korenje
TP 184/2 of 27.2.2013
TP 49/3 z dne 13.3.2008
Carrot and Fodder carrot
komarček
TP 49/3 of 13.3.2008
TP 183/1 z dne 25.3.2004
Fennel
solata
TP 183/1 of 25.3.2004
TP 13/5 rev z dne 19.4.2016
Lettuce
paradižnik
TP 13/5 rev of 19.4.2016
TP 44/4 rev.2 z dne 19.4.2016
Tomato
peteršilj
TP 44/4 rev.2 of 19.4.2016
TP 136/1 z dne 21.3.2007
Parsley
turški (laški) fižol
TP 136/1 of 21.3.2007
TP 9/1 z dne 21.3.2007
Runner bean
navadni fižol in visoki fižol
TP 9/1 of 21.3.2007
TP 12/4 z dne 27.2.2013
Dwarf French bean and Climbing French bean
oglatozrnati grah, okroglozrnati grah in sladkorni grah
TP 12/4 of 27.2.2013
TP 7/2 rev. z dne 11.3.2015
Wrinkled pea, Round pea and Sugar pea
redkvica, vrtna redkev
TP 7/2 Rev. of 11.3.2015
TP 64/2 rev. z dne 11.3.2015
Radish, Black radish
rabarbara
TP 64/2 Rev. of 11.3.2015
TP 62/1 z dne 19.4.2016
Rhubarb
črni koren (navadni gadnjak)
TP 62/1 of 19.4.2016
TP 116/1 z dne 11.3.2015
Scorzonera or Black salsify
jajčevec
TP 116/1 of 11.3.2015
TP 117/1 z dne 13.3.2008
Aubergine or Egg plant
špinača
TP 117/1 of 13.3.2008
TP 55/5rev. z dne 19.4.2016
Spinach
navadni motovilec
TP 55/5rev. of 19.4.2016
TP 75/2 z dne 21.3.2007
Corn salad or Lamb's lettuce
bob
TP 75/2 of 21.3.2007
TP Broadbean/1 z dne 25.3.2004
Broad bean
sladka koruza in pokovka
TP Broadbean/1 of 25.3.2004
paradižnikove podlage
Sweet corn and Pop corn
TP 294/1rev z dne 19.4.2016
Tomato rootstocks
strniščna repa
TP 294/1rev of 19.4.2016
TG/37/10 z dne 4.4.2001
Turnip
listnati ali glavnati radič
TG/37/10 of 4.4.2001
TG/154/3 z dne 18.10.1996
Large-leaved chicory or Italian chicory
medvrstni hibridi Cucurbita maxima Duch. × Cucurbita moschata Duch. za uporabo kot podlage
TG/154/3 of 18.10.1996
TG/311/1 z dne 25.3.2015
Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf.
Mill.; Solanum lycopersicum L.× Solanum cheesmaniae (L. Ridley) Fosberg
Rheum rhabarbarum L
Lolium × boucheanum Kunth
Spooner; Solanum lycopersicum L. x Solanum peruvianum (L.)
Moench × Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf
Directive (EU) 2016/1919 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva (EU) 2016/1919 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on legal aid for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings and for requested persons in European arrest warrant proceedings
o brezplačni pravni pomoči za osumljene in obdolžene osebe v kazenskem postopku ter za zahtevane osebe v postopku na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje
The purpose of this Directive is to ensure the effectiveness of the right of access to a lawyer as provided for under Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] by making available the assistance of a lawyer funded by the Member States for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings and for requested persons who are the subject of European arrest warrant proceedings pursuant to Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA [4] (requested persons).
Namen te direktive je zagotoviti učinkovitost pravice do dostopa do odvetnika, kot določa Direktiva 2013/48/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3], tako da se zagotovi pomoč odvetnika, ki jo financirajo države članice, in sicer osumljenim in obdolženim osebam v kazenskem postopku ter zahtevanim osebam v postopku na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje v skladu z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2002/584/PNZ [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zahtevane osebe).
By establishing common minimum rules concerning the right to legal aid for suspects, accused persons and requested persons, this Directive aims to strengthen the trust of Member States in each other's criminal justice systems and thus to improve mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters.
Z določitvijo skupnih minimalnih pravil o pravici do brezplačne pravne pomoči za osumljene ali obdolžene osebe ter za zahtevane osebe je namen te direktive okrepiti zaupanje držav članic v kazenskopravne sisteme drugih držav članic in tako izboljšati vzajemno priznavanje odločb v kazenskih zadevah.
The third paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter), Article 6(3)(c) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and Article 14(3)(d) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) enshrine the right to legal aid in criminal proceedings in accordance with the conditions laid down in those provisions.
Tretji odstavek člena 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina), člen 6(3)(c) Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP) ter člen 14(3)(d) Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah (MPDPP) določajo pravico do brezplačne pravne pomoči v kazenskem postopku, v skladu s pogoji iz navedenih določb.
The Charter has the same legal value as the Treaties, and the Member States are parties to the ECHR and the ICCPR.
Listina ima enako pravno veljavnost kot Pogodbi in države članice so pogodbenice EKČP in MPDPP.
However, experience has shown that this in itself does not always provide a sufficient degree of trust in the criminal justice systems of other Member States.
Vendar izkušnje kažejo, da to samo po sebi ne zagotavlja vedno zadostnega zaupanja v kazenskopravne sisteme drugih držav članic.
On 30 November 2009, the Council adopted a Resolution on a Roadmap for strengthening the procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings [5] (‘the Roadmap’).
Svet je 30. novembra 2009 sprejel Resolucijo o načrtu za krepitev procesnih pravic osumljenih ali obtoženih oseb v kazenskih postopkih [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: načrt).
Taking a step-by-step approach, the Roadmap calls for the adoption of measures regarding the right to translation and interpretation (measure A), the right to information on rights and information about the charges (measure B), the right to legal advice and legal aid (measure C), the right to communicate with relatives, employers and consular authorities (measure D), and special safeguards for suspects or accused persons who are vulnerable (measure E).
Načrt predvideva postopno sprejetje ukrepov v zvezi s pravico do prevajanja in tolmačenja (ukrep A), pravico do obveščenosti o pravicah in obtožbi (ukrep B), pravico do pravnega svetovanja in pravne pomoči (ukrep C), pravico do komuniciranja s sorodniki, delodajalci in konzularnimi organi (ukrep D) ter v zvezi s posebnim varstvom za osumljene ali obdolžene osebe, ki spadajo v skupino ranljivih oseb (ukrep E).
On 11 December 2009, the European Council welcomed the Roadmap and made it part of the Stockholm programme — ‘An open and secure Europe serving and protecting citizens’ [6] (point 2.4).
Evropski svet je 11. decembra 2009 pozdravil načrt in ga vključil v Stockholmski program – odprta in varna Evropa, ki služi državljanom in jih varuje [6] (točka 2.4).
The European Council underlined the non-exhaustive character of the Roadmap by inviting the Commission to examine further elements of minimum procedural rights for suspects and accused persons, and to assess whether other issues, for instance the presumption of innocence, need to be addressed, in order to promote better cooperation in that area.
Pri tem je poudaril, da načrt ni izčrpen, ter pozval Komisijo, naj preuči nadaljnje elemente minimalnih procesnih pravic osumljenih in obdolženih oseb ter oceni, ali je treba za spodbujanje boljšega sodelovanja na tem področju obravnavati tudi druga vprašanja, na primer domnevo nedolžnosti.
Five measures on procedural rights in criminal proceedings have been adopted pursuant to the Roadmap to date, namely Directives 2010/64/EU [7], 2012/13/EU [8], 2013/48/EU, (EU) 2016/343 [9] and (EU) 2016/800 [10] of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Do zdaj je bilo na podlagi načrta sprejetih pet ukrepov o procesnih pravicah v kazenskem postopku, in sicer direktive 2010/64/EU [7], 2012/13/EU [8], 2013/48/EU, (EU) 2016/343 [9] in (EU) 2016/800 [10] Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
This Directive relates to the second part of measure C of the Roadmap, regarding legal aid.
Ta direktiva zadeva drugi del ukrepa C iz načrta, in sicer v zvezi s pravno pomočjo.
Legal aid should cover the costs of the defence of suspects, accused persons and requested persons.
Brezplačna pravna pomoč bi morala kriti stroške obrambe osumljenih, obdolženih in zahtevanih oseb.
When granting legal aid, the competent authorities of the Member States should be able to require that suspects, accused persons or requested persons bear part of those costs themselves, depending on their financial resources.
Pristojni organi držav članic bi morali imeti možnost, da pri dodelitvi brezplačne pravne pomoči osumljenim, obdolženim ali zahtevanim osebam zahtevajo, da del teh stroškov nosijo same glede na svoja finančna sredstva.
Without prejudice to Article 6 of Directive (EU) 2016/800, this Directive should not apply where suspects or accused persons, or requested persons, have waived their right of access to a lawyer in accordance with, respectively, Article 9 or Article 10(3) of Directive 2013/48/EU, and have not revoked such waiver, or where Member States have applied the temporary derogations in accordance with Article 3(5) or (6) of Directive 2013/48/EU, for the time of such derogation.
Brez poseganja v člen 6 Direktive (EU) 2016/800 se ta direktiva ne bi smela uporabljati, kadar se osumljene ali obdolžene osebe oziroma zahtevane osebe v skladu s členom 9 oziroma členom 10(3) Direktive 2013/48/EU odpovejo pravici do dostopa do odvetnika in te odpovedi naknadno ne prekličejo, oziroma kadar države članice uporabijo začasna odstopanja v skladu s členom 3(5) ali (6) Direktive 2013/48/EU, za čas trajanja takšnega odstopanja.
Where a person who was initially not a suspect or an accused person, such as a witness, becomes a suspect or an accused person, that person should have the right not to incriminate him or herself and the right to remain silent, in accordance with Union law and the ECHR, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union (Court of Justice) and by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).
Kadar oseba, ki prvotno ni bila osumljena ali obdolžena, na primer priča, postane takšna oseba, bi morala imeti pravico, da ne izpove zoper sebe, in pravico do molka v skladu s pravom Unije ter EKČP, kot ju razlagata Sodišče Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sodišče) in Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice (ESČP).
This Directive therefore makes express reference to the practical situation where such a person becomes a suspect or an accused person during questioning by the police or by another law enforcement authority in the context of criminal proceedings.
Ta direktiva se zato izrecno sklicuje na primer, v katerem takšna oseba postane osumljena ali obdolžena med zaslišanjem s strani policije ali drugega organa preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj v okviru kazenskega postopka.
Where, in the course of such questioning, a person other than a suspect or an accused person becomes a suspect or an accused person, questioning should be suspended immediately.
Kadar med takšnim zaslišanjem oseba, ki ni osumljena ali obdolžena, postane takšna oseba, bi bilo treba zaslišanje nemudoma prekiniti.
However, it should be possible to continue questioning where the person concerned has been made aware that he or she has become a suspect or an accused person and that person is able to fully exercise the rights provided for in this Directive.
Vseeno bi moralo biti mogoče, da se zaslišanje nadaljuje, kadar je zadevna oseba seznanjena, da je osumljena ali obdolžena, in lahko v celoti uveljavlja pravice, ki jih določa ta direktiva.
That may be the case, for example, in relation to traffic offences which are committed on a large scale and which might be established following a traffic control.
To je mogoče na primer pri pogostih prometnih kršitvah, ki se lahko ugotovijo med kontrolo prometa.
Where the law of a Member State provides for the imposition of a sanction regarding minor offences by such an authority and there is either a right of appeal or the possibility for the case to be otherwise referred to a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters, this Directive should therefore apply only to the proceedings before that court following such an appeal or referral.
Kadar pravo države članice določa, da sankcijo za manjše kršitve izreče takšen organ, in bodisi obstaja pravica do pritožbe bodisi je mogoče zadevo drugače predložiti sodišču, pristojnemu za kazenske zadeve, bi se torej morala ta direktiva uporabljati le za postopke pred tem sodiščem po vložitvi take pritožbe ali predložitvi zadeve.
Where the law of a Member State provides in respect of minor offences that deprivation of liberty cannot be imposed as a sanction, this Directive should therefore apply only to the proceedings before a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters.
Če pravo države članice v zvezi z manjšimi kršitvami določa, da odvzem prostosti kot sankcija ni mogoč, bi se torej morala ta direktiva uporabljati le v postopkih pred sodiščem, pristojnim za kazenske zadeve.
The application of this Directive to minor offences is subject to the conditions set out in this Directive.
Ta direktiva se lahko uporablja za manjše kršitve, če so izpolnjeni pogoji, določeni v njej.
Member States should be able to apply a means test, a merits test, or both in order to determine whether legal aid is to be granted.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da izvedejo oceno materialnega položaja, oceno upravičenosti na podlagi pravičnosti ali oboje, da ugotovijo, ali je treba dodeliti brezplačno pravno pomoč.
Provided that this complies with the right to a fair trial, the merits test may be deemed not to have been met in respect of certain minor offences.
Pod pogojem, da je to skladno s pravico do poštenega sojenja, se lahko v zvezi z nekaterimi manjšimi kršitvami šteje, da pogoji, kar zadeva oceno upravičenosti na podlagi pravičnosti, niso izpolnjeni.
The scope of application of this Directive in respect of certain minor offences should not affect the obligations of Member States under the ECHR to ensure the right to a fair trial, including obtaining the assistance of a lawyer.
Uporaba te direktive, kar zadeva nekatere manjše kršitve, ne bi smela vplivati na obveznosti držav članic v skladu z EKČP, da zagotovijo pravico do poštenega sojenja, tudi glede pomoči odvetnika.
Provided that this complies with the right to a fair trial, the following situations do not constitute a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of this Directive: identifying the suspect or accused person; determining whether an investigation should be started; verifying the possession of weapons or other similar safety issues; carrying out investigative or evidence-gathering acts other than those specifically referred to in this Directive, such as body checks, physical examinations, blood, alcohol or similar tests, or the taking of photographs or fingerprints; bringing the suspect or accused person to appear before a competent authority, in accordance with national law.
Pod pogojem, da je to skladno s pravico do poštenega sojenja, naslednji primeri ne štejejo za odvzem prostosti v smislu te direktive: ugotavljanje identitete osumljene ali obdolžene osebe; ugotavljanje, ali je treba sprožiti preiskavo; preverjanje, ali je oseba oborožena oziroma ali obstajajo druga podobna varnostna vprašanja; izvajanje preiskovalnih dejanj ali dejanj zbiranja dokazov – ki niso posebej navedena v tej direktivi – kot so telesni pregledi, fizični pregledi, krvne preiskave, preizkusi alkoholiziranosti ali podobni preizkusi, fotografiranje ali odvzem prstnih odtisov; privedba osumljene ali obdolžene osebe pred pristojni organ v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
Member States should be able to grant legal aid in situations which are not covered by this Directive, for example when investigative or evidence-gathering acts other than those specifically referred to in this Directive are carried out.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da brezplačno pravno pomoč dodelijo v primerih, ki jih ta direktiva ne ureja, na primer kadar se izvajajo preiskovalna dejanja ali dejanja zbiranja dokazov, ki niso posebej navedena v tej direktivi.
In accordance with Article 6(3)(c) ECHR, suspects and accused persons who lack sufficient resources to pay for the assistance of a lawyer are to have the right to legal aid when the interests of justice so require.
V skladu s členom 6(3)(c) EKČP ima osumljena ali obdolžena oseba, ki nima dovolj sredstev za plačilo pomoči odvetnika, pravico do brezplačne pravne pomoči, če to zahtevajo interesi pravičnosti.
This minimum rule allows Member States to apply a means test, a merits test, or both.
To minimalno pravilo državam članicam omogoča, da izvedejo oceno materialnega položaja, oceno upravičenosti na podlagi pravičnosti ali oboje.
The application of those tests should not limit or derogate from the rights and procedural safeguards that are ensured under the Charter and the ECHR, as interpreted by the Court of Justice and by the ECtHR.
Izvedba teh ocen ne bi smela omejevati ali odstopati od pravic in procesnih jamstev, ki jih zagotavljata Listina in EKČP, kot ju razlagata Sodišče in ESČP, ali dovoliti odstopanje od njih.
Member States should lay down practical arrangements regarding the provision of legal aid.
Države članice bi morale določiti praktično ureditev v zvezi z zagotavljanjem brezplačne pravne pomoči.
Such arrangements could determine that legal aid is granted following a request by a suspect, an accused person or a requested person.
Takšna ureditev bi lahko določala, da se brezplačna pravna pomoč dodeli na prošnjo osumljene, obdolžene ali zahtevane osebe.
Given in particular the needs of vulnerable persons, such a request should not, however, be a substantive condition for granting legal aid.
Vendar ta prošnja zlasti ob upoštevanju potreb ranljivih oseb ne bi smela biti vsebinski pogoj za dodelitev brezplačne pravne pomoči.
The competent authorities should grant legal aid without undue delay and at the latest before questioning of the person concerned by the police, by another law enforcement authority or by a judicial authority, or before the specific investigative or evidence-gathering acts referred to in this Directive are carried out.
Pristojni organi bi morali brezplačno pravno pomoč dodeliti brez nepotrebnega odlašanja in najpozneje pred zaslišanjem s strani policije, drugega organa preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja kaznivih dejanj ali pravosodnega organa, ali pred izvedbo konkretnega preiskovalnega dejanja ali dejanja zbiranja dokazov, navedenega v tej direktivi.
If the competent authorities are not able to do so, they should at least grant emergency or provisional legal aid before such questioning or before such investigative or evidence-gathering acts are carried out.
Če pristojni organi tega ne morejo storiti, bi morali pred izvedbo takšnega zaslišanja, preiskovalnega dejanja ali dejanja zbiranja dokazov dodeliti vsaj nujno ali začasno brezplačno pravno pomoč.
Given the specificity of European arrest warrant proceedings, the interpretation of the provisions of this Directive relating only to requested persons should take into account this specificity and should not in any way prejudice the interpretation of the other provisions of this Directive.
Glede na posebnost postopka na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje bi bilo treba pri razlagi določb te direktive, povezanih zgolj z zahtevanimi osebami, upoštevati to posebnost, ta razlaga pa nikakor ne bi smela posegati v razlago drugih določb te direktive.
Requested persons should have the right to legal aid in the executing Member State.
Zahtevane osebe bi morale imeti pravico do brezplačne pravne pomoči v izvršitveni državi članici.
In addition, requested persons who are the subject of European arrest warrant proceedings for the purpose of conducting a criminal prosecution and who exercise their right to appoint a lawyer in the issuing Member State in accordance with Directive 2013/48/EU should have the right to legal aid in that Member State for the purpose of such proceedings in the executing Member State, in so far as legal aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice, as laid down in Article 47 of the Charter.
Poleg tega bi morale imeti zahtevane osebe, ki so v postopku na podlagi evropskega naloga za prijetje zaradi uvedbe kazenskega postopka in ki uveljavljajo svojo pravico do izbire odvetnika v odreditveni državi članici v skladu z Direktivo 2013/48/EU, pravico do brezplačne pravne pomoči v tej državi članici za namene takšnega postopka v izvršitveni državi članici, če je brezplačna pravna pomoč potrebna za zagotovitev učinkovitega dostopa do pravnega varstva, kot je določeno v členu 47 Listine.