natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The non-cooperating Russian exporting producers as well as the Russian authorities were informed of the Commission's intention to apply Article 18 of the basic Regulation and to base its findings on facts available.
Nesodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika iz Rusije in ruski organi so bili obveščeni o nameri Komisije, da uporabi člen 18 osnovne uredbe in svoje ugotovitve opre na razpoložljiva dejstva.
Therefore, the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping was assessed by using the expiry review request, combined with other sources of information such as Eurostat trade statistics on imports, Russian export statistics and Metal Bulletin.
Zato je bila verjetnost nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga ocenjena z uporabo zahtevka za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov v povezavi z drugimi viri informacij, kot so Eurostatovi statistični podatki o uvozu, statistični podatki o ruskem izvozu in Metal Bulletin.
The significant non-cooperation affected the comparison of the normal value with the export price of the various product types.
Odsotnost sodelovanja je vplivala na primerjavo normalne vrednosti z izvozno ceno različnih vrst izdelka.
The Commission noted that statistics from Eurostat reported some imports of the product concerned from Russia.
Komisija je ugotovila, da Eurostatovi statistični podatki poročajo o uvozu zadevnega izdelka iz Rusije.
However, the quantities were very limited and thus prices of these imports were considered unrepresentative.
Vendar pa so bile količine zelo majhne, zato cene tega uvoza niso štele za reprezentativne.
Therefore, information of likely export prices to the Union was based on export prices to other third countries, as indicated in recital 73 below.
Zato so informacije o verjetnih izvoznih cenah v Unijo temeljile na izvoznih cenah v druge tretje države, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 73.
As mentioned in recital 61 above, the significant non-cooperation from exporting producers in Russia forced the Commission to use facts available in establishing a normal value.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 61, je morala Komisija za določitev normalne vrednosti uporabiti razpoložljiva dejstva, ker proizvajalci izvozniki v Rusiji niso sodelovali.
To this end, the information submitted by the cooperating Russian producer was used.
V ta namen je uporabila informacije, ki jih je predložil sodelujoči ruski proizvajalec.
Normal value was determined in accordance with Article 2(2) first sentence, of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je bila določena v skladu s prvim stavkom člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
It was first established whether the total domestic sales quantity of the like product during the review investigation period was representative in comparison to Russian export sales to third countries.
Najprej je bilo ocenjeno, ali je bil celotni obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka v OPP reprezentativen v primerjavi z ruskim izvozom v tretje države.
Domestic sales were found representative if sales volumes of the like product represented 5 % or more of Russian export sales to third countries.
Domača prodaja je štela za reprezentativno, če je obseg prodaje podobnega izdelka predstavljal 5 % ali več ruskega izvoza v tretje države.
It was subsequently examined whether the like product was sold in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Nato je bilo proučeno, ali se je podobni izdelek prodajal v običajnem poteku trgovine v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
In order to perform the ordinary course of trade test the average cost of production was considered.
Za izvedbo preskusa običajnega poteka trgovine so se upoštevali povprečni stroški proizvodnje.
It was found that the domestic gas price paid by the exporting producers was around 30 % of the export price of natural gas from Russia.
V zvezi s tem vsi razpoložljivi podatki kažejo, da so domače cene plina v Rusiji nadzorovane in precej nižje od tržnih cen, ki veljajo na nenadzorovanih izvoznih trgih ruskega zemeljskega plina.
In this regard, all available data indicated that domestic gas prices in Russia are regulated prices, which are far below market prices paid in unregulated export markets for Russian natural gas.
Ker evidenca proizvajalca izvoznika ni ustrezno odražala stroškov za plin v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe, jih je bilo treba ustrezno prilagoditi.
Since gas costs were not reasonably reflected in the exporting producer's records as provided for in Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, they had to be adjusted accordingly.
Ker ni bilo na razpolago nobenih dovolj reprezentativnih neizkrivljenih cen plina z ruskega domačega trga, se je zdelo primerno, da prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe temelji na informacijah z drugih reprezentativnih trgov.
In the absence of sufficiently representative, undistorted gas prices relating to the Russian domestic market, it was considered appropriate to base the adjustment, in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of information from other representative markets.
Prilagojena cena je temeljila na povprečni ceni ruskega plina pri prodaji za izvoz na nemško-češki meji (Waidhaus), prilagojeni glede na lokalne distribucijske stroške.
The adjusted price was based on the average price of Russian gas when sold for export at the German/Czech border (Waidhaus), adjusted for local distribution costs.
Waidhaus je glavno vozlišče za prodajo ruskega plina v EU, ki je največji trg za ruski plin, njegove cene pa ustrezno odražajo stroške.
Waidhaus is the main hub for Russian gas sales to the EU, which is both the largest market for the Russian gas and has prices reasonably reflecting costs.
Zato se lahko v smislu člena 2(5) osnovne uredbe šteje za reprezentativen trg.
It can therefore be considered to be a representative market within the meaning of Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je Komisija v preskusu običajnega poteka trgovine uporabila povprečne stroške proizvodnje po prilagoditvi glede na stroške plina.
Consequently, the Commission used for the ordinary course of trade test the average cost of production after the adjustment for the gas cost.
Normalna vrednost je bila tako določena kot povprečna cena dobičkonosne domače prodaje v OPP, saj je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje predstavljal 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje.
The normal value was thus established as the average price of the profitable domestic sales during the review investigation period, since the volume of profitable sales represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume.
Ker proizvajalci izvozniki iz Rusije niso sodelovali, je morala Komisija za določitev izvozne cene uporabiti razpoložljiva dejstva.
The significant non-cooperation from exporting producers in Russia forced the Commission to use facts available in establishing the export price.
Informacij, ki jih je predložil edini sodelujoči ruski proizvajalec, ni bilo mogoče uporabiti, saj ta proizvajalec zadevnega izdelka ni izvažal v EU, v druge tretje države pa je izvažal le zanemarljive količine.
Information from the sole cooperating Russian producer could not be used as this producer did not export the product concerned to the EU and exported only insignificant quantities to other third countries.
Iz tega razloga in glede na to, da je bil izvoz iz Rusije v Unijo zanemarljiv, je bila verjetna izvozna cena določena na podlagi statističnih podatkov o ruskem izvozu, in sicer izvozu v druge tretje države.
For this reason, and given that the exports from Russia to the Union were insignificant, the likely export price was established on the basis of Russian export statistics, using exports to other third countries.
Izvoz v druge tretje države je potekal v znatnih količinah.
Exports to other third countries were made in significant quantities.
Ker edini sodelujoči ruski proizvajalec proizvaja izključno tako imenovane „črne cevi“ (negalvanizirane cevi), je bila izvozna cena določena le na podlagi podatkov o črnih ceveh.
Since the sole cooperating Russian producer exclusively produced so-called ‘black pipes’ (that means non-galvanized pipes), only information relating to black pipes was used to establish export price.
V skladu s statističnimi podatki o ruskem izvozu se tudi velika večina ruskega izvoza nanaša na črne cevi.
According to Russian export statistics, the overwhelming majority of Russian exports also relates to black pipes.
Po razkritju je edini sodelujoči ruski proizvajalec trdil, da bi se morale uporabiti njegove izvozne cene, ker predstavljajo več kot 10 % njegove skupne prodaje.
Following disclosure, the sole cooperating Russian producer claimed that its export prices should have been used as they account for more than 10 % of its total sales.
Vendar pa ta prodaja ne predstavlja niti 2 % celotnega izvoza, o katerem poroča ruska izvozna statistika.
However, these sales only account for less than 2 % of the total exports reported by Russian export statistics.
Na podlagi tega se ohrani ugotovitev, da izvoznih cen tega proizvajalca ni mogoče uporabiti zaradi zanemarljivega obsega izvoza.
On this basis, the conclusion that the export prices of this producer cannot be used due to their insignificant quantity is maintained.
Po potrebi so se upoštevale razlike v prevoznih stroških.
Allowances for differences in transport costs were made where applicable.
Na podlagi navedenega je bila verjetna stopnja dampinga v smislu člena 11(2) osnovne uredbe 38,7 %.
On the basis of the above, the likely dumping margin within the meaning of Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation was at 38, 7 %.
Vložnik je ocenil, da neizkoriščene zmogljivosti zadevnega izdelka v Rusiji presegajo skupno potrošnjo na trgu EU.
The applicant estimated that the spare capacity of the product concerned in Russia exceeds the total consumption on the EU market.
Ocena vložnika je temeljila na podatkih, objavljenih v podatkovni bazi Metal Expert.
The applicant based its estimate on information published in Metal Expert.
Poleg tega je vložnik predvidel 56-odstotno izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, ki jo potrjujejo tudi informacije, ki jih je predložil sodelujoči proizvajalec.
Furthermore, the applicant assumed a capacity utilisation of 56 %, which is confirmed by the information submitted by the cooperating producer.
Če bi bili ukrepi razveljavljeni, tako obstaja precejšnje tveganje, da bodo ruski proizvajalci izvozniki prodali znatne količine varjenih cevi na trg Unije po dampinških cenah.
Thus, should measures be repealed, there is a substantial risk that Russian exporting producers will sell significant quantities of welded pipes to the Union market at dumped prices.
Po razkritju sta nesodelujoča ruska proizvajalca iz uvodne izjave 61 trdila, da Komisija ni upoštevala informacij v zvezi z domnevno privlačnostjo drugih trgov, vključno z ruskim trgom in neizkoriščeno zmogljivostjo v Rusiji, ki sta jih predložila ta dva proizvajalca.
Following disclosure, the non-cooperating Russian producers referred to in recital 61 above claimed that the Commission would have disregarded information concerning an alleged attractiveness of other markets including the Russian market and spare capacities in Russia submitted by these producers.
Zato so te informacije manj relevantne od informacij, ki jih je predložil vložnik.
That information is therefore less relevant than the information provided by the applicant.
Glede na informacije, ki sta jih predložila nesodelujoča ruska proizvajalca v zvezi z domnevno privlačnostjo drugih trgov, vključno z ruskim trgom, je najprej treba poudariti, da zaradi nesodelovanja teh podatkov ni bilo mogoče preveriti.
Furthermore, even on the basis of the 60 %-70 % capacity utilisation rate claimed by the Russian producers, the resulting spare capacity would account for most of the consumption on the EU market.
Drugič, te informacije so v nasprotju z informacijami, pridobljenimi med preiskavo, kot so navedene v uvodnih izjavah 84–86 in ki temeljijo na uradni ruski izvozni statistiki in ki jih nesodelujoča ruska proizvajalca nista spodbijala.
As regards the information provided by the non-cooperating Russian producers concerning an alleged attractiveness of other markets including the Russian market, it should first be stated that due to non-cooperation, this data could not be verified.
V skladu s statističnimi podatki o ruski trgovini je povprečna izvozna cena Rusije 647 EUR/tono, kar je veliko nižje od povprečne prodajne cen industrije Unije v višini 848 EUR/tono in ustreza povprečnim uvoznim cenam v Unijo iz glavnih držav izvoznic, kot sta Indija in Turčija.
Second, such information contradicts the information obtained during the investigation, as set out in recitals 84 to 86 below, which is based on official Russian export statistics and which has not been challenged by the two non-cooperating Russian producers.
V skladu z isto trgovinsko statistiko se 33 % celotnega ruskega izvoza proda v Azerbajdžan, ki je za Rusijo najpomembnejši izvozni trg.
According to the Russian trade statistics, the average Russian export price of 647 EUR/tonne is far below the average sales price of the Union industry of 848 EUR/tonne and in line with average import prices into the Union from major exporting countries such as India and Turkey.
Prodajna cena v Azerbajdžan znaša 586 EUR/tono ter je znatno nižja od prodajne cene industrije EU v višini 848 EUR/tono in celo nižja od cen, ki jih zaračunavajo drugi glavnih izvozniki v Unijo, na primer Indija ali Turčija.
According to the same trade statistics, 33 % of all Russian exports are sold to Azerbaijan, Russia's most important export market.
Poleg tega ruski izvoz v Azerbajdžan ustreza približno 15 % potrošnje EU.
The sales price to Azerbaijan is 586 EUR/tonne, and therefore significantly lower than the EU industry's sales price of 848 EUR/tonne, and even lower than prices charged by other main exporters to the Union such as India or Turkey.
Zato obstaja tveganje, da se bo izvoz preusmeril na trg EU, če bi bili ukrepi razveljavljeni.
Moreover the Russian exports to Azerbaijan are equivalent to around 15 % of EU consumption.
Glede na navedeno je Komisija sklenila, da obstaja znatno tveganje za preusmeritev trgovine na trg Unije, če bi bili ukrepi razveljavljeni.
Hence there is a risk that there exports will be redirected to the EU should the measures be repealed.
Glede na razpoložljivo neizkoriščeno zmogljivost v Rusiji in privlačne ravni cen na trgu Unije je mogoče sklepati, da obstaja tveganje za povečanje dampinškega izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Rusije v Unijo, če bi bili veljavni ukrepi odpravljeni.
In light of the above, the Commission concluded that there is a significant risk of trade diversion to the Union market should measures be repealed.
Po razkritju so zainteresirane strani trdile, da ohranitev ukrepov, ki veljajo proti Rusiji, ob hkratni ukinitvi veljavnih ukrepov proti Ukrajini (glej spodaj) pomeni diskriminacijo, saj naj bi imeli Rusija in Ukrajina podobno neizkoriščeno zmogljivost.
The available spare capacity in Russia and the attractive price level in the Union market lead to the conclusion that there is a risk of an increase in Russian dumped exports of the product concerned to the Union should the measures in force be allowed to lapse.
Ta trditev ni podprta z ugotovitvami te preiskave, s katero je bila ugotovljena precejšnja neizkoriščena zmogljivost v Rusiji, ki predstavlja najmanj večino potrošnje na trgu EU.
Following disclosure, interested parties argued that maintaining the measures in force against Russia while terminating the measures in force against Ukraine (see below) amounts to discrimination, since Russia and Ukraine allegedly had similar spare capacities.
Po drugi strani pa je bilo za Ukrajino ugotovljeno, da je razpoložljiva neizkoriščena zmogljivost za izvoz v vse države omejena.
This claim is not supported by the findings of the investigation, which established significant spare capacities in Russia accounting for at least most of the consumption on the EU market.
Zaradi te bistvene razlike glede neizkoriščene zmogljivosti se trditev o diskriminaciji zavrne.
On the other hand, for Ukraine, it was established that the available spare capacities for exports to all countries are limited.
UKRAJINA
Due to this significant difference in spare capacities, the claim of discrimination is therefore rejected.
V preiskavi je sodeloval samo en ukrajinski proizvajalec izvoznik, družba „Interpipe group“ („Interpipe“).
UKRAINE
Družba Interpipe predstavlja velik del ukrajinske proizvodnje in skoraj celoten ukrajinski izvoz v Unijo, ki je zelo majhen.
Only one Ukrainian exporting producer, the ‘Interpipe Group’ (‘Interpipe’), cooperated during the investigation.
Znani so vsaj štirje ukrajinski proizvajalci, ki niso sodelovali, vendar je v skladu s trgovinsko statistiko njihov izvoz v EU zanemarljiv.
Interpipe accounts for the significant part of the Ukrainian production and for almost the totality of the very few Ukrainian exports to the Union.
Glede na zanemarljivi izvoz iz Ukrajine v Unijo je bila verjetna izvozna cena določena na podlagi prodajnih cen družbe Interpipe v druge tretje države, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 17.
There are at least 4 known Ukrainian producers who do not cooperate, but according to trade statistics their exports to the EU are insignificant.
Komisija je najprej proučila, ali je bil celoten obseg domače prodaje edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, družbe Interpipe, reprezentativen v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
In the light of insignificant Ukrainian exports to the Union, the likely export price was established on the basis of sales prices of Interpipe to other third countries as described in recital 17 above.
Domača prodaja je reprezentativna, če je skupni obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu predstavljal vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka drugim tretjim državam v OPP.
The Commission first examined whether the total volume of domestic sales for the sole cooperating exporting producer, Interpipe, was representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Na tej podlagi je bil celotni obseg prodaje podobnega izdelka s strani družbe Interpipe na domačem trgu reprezentativen.
The domestic sales are representative if the total domestic sales volume of the like product to independent customers on the domestic market constituted at least 5 % of total export sales volume of the product concerned to other third countries during the review investigation period.
Komisija je nato opredelila, katere vrste izdelka družbe Interpipe, ki se prodajajo na domačem trgu, so enake ali primerljive z vrstami, izvoženimi v Unijo.
On this basis, the total sales by Interpipe of the like product on the domestic market were representative.
Komisija je nato za družbo Interpipe proučila, ali je domača prodaja vseh vrst izdelka, ki so enake ali primerljive z vrsto izdelka, ki se izvaža, reprezentativna v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission subsequently identified the product types sold domestically that were identical or comparable with the product types sold for export by Interpipe.
Domača prodaja vrste izdelka je reprezentativna, če je skupni obseg domače prodaje te vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam v OPP predstavljal vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza enake ali podobne vrste izdelka.
The Commission then examined whether the domestic sales of Interpipe for each product type that is identical or comparable with a product type sold for export were representative, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bila za večino vrst izdelka domača prodaja reprezentativna.
The domestic sales of a product type are representative if the total volume of domestic sales of that product type to independent customers during the review investigation period constituted at least 5 % of the total volume of export sales of the identical or comparable product type.
Nato je Komisija določila delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu za vsako vrsto izdelka v OPP, da bi se odločila, ali bo za izračun normalne vrednosti uporabila dejansko domačo prodajo v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission established that for the majority of product types domestic sales were made in representative quantities.
Normalna vrednost temelji na dejanski domači ceni za posamezno vrsto izdelka, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne, če je:
The Commission next defined the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market for each product type during the review investigation period in order to decide whether to use actual domestic sales for the calculation of the normal value, in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, enaki izračunanim stroškom proizvodnje ali višji od njih, predstavljal več kot 80 % skupnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka, in
The normal value is based on the actual domestic price per product type, irrespective of whether those sales are profitable or not, if:
tehtana povprečna prodajna cena te vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto.
the sales volume of the product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of this product type; and
V tem primeru je normalna vrednost tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje te vrste izdelka v OPP.
the weighted average sales price of that product type is equal to or higher than the unit cost of production.
Normalna vrednost je dejanska domača cena za posamezno vrsto izdelka, in sicer izključno pri dobičkonosni domači prodaji te vrste izdelka v OPP, če:
In this case, the normal value is the weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that product type during the review investigation period.
obseg dobičkonosne prodaje te vrste izdelka predstavlja 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste izdelka; ali
The normal value is the actual domestic price per product type of only the profitable domestic sales of the product types during the review investigation period, if:
tehtana povprečna cena te vrste izdelka nižja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto.
the volume of profitable sales of the product type represents 80 % or less of the total sales volume of this type; or
Analiza domače prodaje je pokazala, da je bila normalna vrednost izračunana kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje v OPP ali kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje, odvisno od vrste izdelka.
the weighted average price of this product type is below the unit cost of production.
Če ni bilo prodaje določene vrste podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine ali če določena vrsta izdelka ni bila prodana v reprezentativnih količinah na domačem trgu, je Komisija konstruirala normalno vrednost v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
The analysis of domestic sales showed that the normal value was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales during the review investigation period or a weighted average of the profitable sales only depending on the product type.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da se je proizvodnim stroškom podobnega izdelka družbe Interpipe v OPP prištelo naslednje:
When there were no sales of a product type of the like product in the ordinary course of trade, or where a product type was not sold in representative quantities on the domestic market, the Commission constructed the normal value in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
prodajni, splošni in administrativni stroški, ki jih je imela družba Interpipe pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine v OPP, ter
Normal value was constructed by adding the following to the cost of production of the like product of Interpipe during the review investigation period:
dobiček družbe Interpipe pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine v OPP.