natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
from the east — along the state border with Belarussia from the river Bug to the line of the forestry area;
na vzhodu: od vasi Wólka Nurzecka v ravni črti v smeri meje s Siemiatyckim okrožjem, nato vzdolž meje s Siemiatyckim okrožjem do reke Pulwa;
from the north — along the line of the forestry area from the state border to the road connecting villages Sutno and Niemirów, then along this road to the intersection with the local road directing south;
na jugu: vzdolž severnega brega reke Pulwa v smeri vasi Litwinowicze, nato od vasi Litwinowicze ob cesti, ki vodi do vasi Anusin, do izvira reke Pulwa;
from the west — along the local road directing south from the intersection with the road connecting villages Sutno and Niemirów to the line of the river Bug;
na zahodu: od ceste Litwinowicze–Anusin (v črti izvira reke Pulwa) naravnost proti severozahodu do vasi Siemichocze, nato od križišča cest Anusin–Siemichocze severno do ceste Tymianka–Nurzec s prehodom ceste 1 km od vasi Nurzec Kolonia;
from the south — along the line of the river Bug from the end of the local road which begins at the intersection with the road Sutno — Niemirów up to the state border.
na severu: od ceste Tymianka–Nurzec v ravni črti do vasi Wólka Nurzecka.
from the east — from the estuary of the river Czyżówka in a straight line to the river Bug in the northern direction;
na vzhodu: od vasi Kolonia Budy v ravni črti do vasi Sokoli Gród, nato proti jugu do lokalne ceste, ki povezuje vasi Kulesze in Wilamówka;
from the north — along the river Bug to the border with województwo mazowieckie;
na jugu: vzdolž lokalne ceste do vasi Wilamówka, nato v ravni črti zahodno do vasi Olszowa Droga;
from the west — from the river Bug in the southern direction along the dirt Road down to the northern end of the forest Las Konstantynowski, then down to the road Gnojno — Konstantynów and along this road in the southern Direktion to the southern end of the forest, then along the dirt road in the eastern direction to the village Witoldów and then to the road Konstantynów — Janów Podlaski;
na zahodu: vzdolž vzhodnega brega reke Biebrza severno do južne meje kompleksa Osowiec Twierdza;
from the south — along the road Konstantynów — Janów Podlaski in the eastern direction to the river Czyżówka.
na severu: od južne meje kompleksa Osowiec Twierdza ob cesti Carska Droga, nato jugovzhodno do vasi Kolonia Budy.
from the east — from the village Stara Bordziłówka along the local road directing north, up to the intersection of the district roads no.
15. oktober 2016
1022 and 1025, and then along the road no.
Ogroženo območje
1025 to the village Nosów;
Območje, navedeno spodaj:
from the north — from the village Nosów along the district road no.
v Podlaškem vojvodstvu:
1024 in the western direction to the border with the województwo mazowieckie;
Hajnowsko okrožje,
from the west — along the border with the województwo mazowieckie to the local road in a line of the village Wygnanki;
Białostocko okrožje,
from the south — from the border with the województwo mazowieckie in a line of the village Wygnanki to the local road directing to the west end of the forest, then along the local road at northern border of the forest to the local road directing to the village Stara Bordziłówka.
Bielsko okrožje,
from the east and south — from the border with the województwo lubelskie from the local road connecting the villages Makarówka and Cełujki, along the border with the województwo lubelskie to the district road no.
Grajewsko okrožje,
2020W, and then along this road no.
Łomżyńsko okrožje,
2020W to the intersection with the regional road no.
okrožje mesta Białystok,
698 in the village Wólka Nosowska, including the whole village of Wólka Nosowska;
okrožje mesta Łomża,
from the west — from the border with the województwo lubelskie along the local road connecting the villages Cełujki and Makarówka to the village of Makarówka, including the whole village of Makarówka, then further in the north-western direction along the district road no.
Moniecko okrožje,
2037W to the village Huszlew, including the whole village of Huszlew, then from the village Huszlew along the district road no.
Wysokomazowiecko okrožje,
2034W to the end of the forest, then in the eastern direction along the northern border of the forest, to the eastern border of the gmina Huszlew, then in the northern direction along the western border of the forest up to the regional road no.
Zambrowsko okrožje;
698;
v Mazovijskem vojvodstvu:
from the north — along the regional road no.
občine Rzekuń, Troszyn, Czerwin in Goworowo v Ostrołęckem okrožju,
698 through the village Rudka to the village Stara Kornica, including the villages Rudka, Stara Kornica and Nowa Kornica, then along the regional road no.
občine Korczew, Przesmyki, Paprotnia, Suchożebry, Mordy, Siedlce in Zbuczyn v Siedleckem okrožju,
698 to the intersection with the district road no.
okrožje mesta Siedlce,
2020W in the village Wólka Nosowska.
občine Ceranów, Jabłonna Lacka, Sterdyń in Repki v Sokołowskem okrožju,
from the east — along the state border: from the road no 640 to the line of the village Kolonia Klukowicze,
Łosicko okrožje,
from the north — from the state border along the road Kolonia Klukowicze — Witoszczyzna, to the road Wilanowo — Werpol,
Ostrowsko okrožje;
from the west — along the road Werpol– Wilanowo to the road no.
v Lublinskem vojvodstvu:
640 in a line of the intersection with the road Koterka — Tokary,
Bialsko okrožje.
Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2016/1455
Delegirani sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/1455
amending Annex III to Decision No 466/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union, as regards Belarus
o spremembi Priloge III k Sklepu št. 466/2014/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odobritvi jamstva EU Evropski investicijski banki za izgube pri financiranju v podporo naložbenim projektom zunaj Unije, kar zadeva Belorusijo
Having regard to Decision No 466/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union, [1], and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 466/2014/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. aprila 2014 o odobritvi jamstva EU Evropski investicijski banki za izgube pri financiranju v podporo naložbenim projektom zunaj Unije [1] in zlasti člena 4(2) Sklepa,
There has been some progress in the economic, social, environmental and political areas in Belarus since the adoption of Decision No 466/2014/EU.
Po sprejetju Sklepa št. 466/2014/EU je bil v Belorusiji dosežen določen napredek na gospodarskem, socialnem, okoljskem in političnem področju.
In January 2015, Coreper endorsed a list of 29 measures to enhance the EU's policy of critical engagement with Belarus.
Coreper je januarja 2015 potrdil seznam 29 ukrepov za krepitev kritično naravnane politike EU do Belorusije.
One of these measures concerns the review by the EU of its restrictive approach to European Investment Bank (EIB) lending in Belarus.
Eden od teh ukrepov se nanaša na pregled, ki ga EU opravi v zvezi s svojim omejevalnim pristopom do posojil Evropske investicijske banke (EIB) v Belorusiji.
In its conclusions of 1 October 2015, the Political and Security Committee listed additional concrete measures to deepen the EU's policy of critical engagement with Belarus and notably the measure easing the restrictions on EIB financing in Belarus.
Politični in varnostni odbor je v sklepih z dne 1. oktobra 2015 navedel dodatne konkretne ukrepe za okrepitev politike EU glede kritičnega sodelovanja z Belorusijo in zlasti ukrepe za sprostitev omejitev pri financiranju EIB v Belorusiji.
In its conclusions on Belarus of 15 February 2016, the Council decided to accelerate the implementation of measures aimed at enhancing EU-Belarus cooperation in a number of economic, trade and assistance related fields, with the goal of modernising Belarus and its economy and for the benefit of the Belarusian population, including in view of accession to World Trade Organisation and in cooperation with International Financial Institutions, in particular the EIB and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in line with their respective mandates.
Svet se je v svojih sklepih o Belorusiji z dne 15. februarja 2016 odločil za pospešitev izvajanja ukrepov, namenjenih okrepitvi sodelovanja med EU in Belorusijo na številnih področjih, povezanih z gospodarstvom, trgovino in pomočjo, s ciljem modernizirati Belorusijo in njeno gospodarstvo ter v korist beloruskega prebivalstva, med drugim glede pristopa k Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji, ter v sodelovanju z mednarodnimi finančnimi institucijami, zlasti z EIB in Evropsko banko za obnovo in razvoj (EBRD), v skladu z njihovimi mandati.
The Council also encouraged Belarus to accelerate much needed economic reforms.
Poleg tega je Svet Belorusijo spodbudil k pospešitvi prepotrebnih gospodarskih reform.
Tangible steps taken by Belarus to respect universal fundamental freedoms, rule of law and human rights would remain key for the shaping of the Union's future policy towards Belarus.
Na oblikovanje prihodnje politike Unije do Belorusije bodo še naprej odločilno vplivali konkretni ukrepi Belorusije za spoštovanje splošnih temeljnih svoboščin, pravne države in človekovih pravic.
Given the political developments in Belarus, financial support from the Union and the international community, including through the relaxation of restrictions on EIB activities in Belarus, could help the country to develop its private sector, improve its infrastructure and foster productivity growth, thus contributing to improve the dynamism and medium-term growth performance of Belarussian economy.
Glede na politično dogajanje v Belorusiji bi finančna podpora Unije in mednarodne skupnosti, med drugim s sprostitvijo omejitev dejavnosti EIB v Belorusiji, lahko pomagala državi pri razvoju zasebnega sektorja, izboljšanju infrastrukture in spodbujanju rasti produktivnosti, kar bi prispevalo k večji dinamičnosti in srednjeročni rasti beloruskega gospodarstva.
Moreover, EIB financing operations which promote the application of the appropriate environmental standards should support the environmentally sound and sustainable development of Belarus.
Poleg tega bi moralo financiranje EIB, ki spodbuja izvajanje ustreznih okoljskih standardov, podpirati okolju prijazen in trajnosten razvoj Belorusije.
Therefore, the Commission, with the involvement of the European External Action Service, has assessed that the overall economic, social, environmental and political situation allows adding Belarus to Annex III to Decision No 466/2014/EU, which sets out the list of countries eligible for EIB financing under Union guarantee.
Komisija je zato v sodelovanju z Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje ocenila, da splošne gospodarske, socialne, okoljske in politične razmere omogočajo uvrstitev Belorusije v Prilogo III k Sklepu št. 466/2014/EU, ki navaja seznam držav, upravičenih do financiranja EIB z jamstvom Unije.
Decision No 466/2014/EU should therefore be amended accordingly,
Sklep št. 466/2014/EU bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
In point B(2) of Annex III to Decision No 466/2014/EU, the words ‘Eastern Europe: Republic of Moldova, Ukraine’ are replaced by ‘Eastern Europe: Belarus, Republic of Moldova, Ukraine’.
V točki B(2) Priloge III k Sklepu št. 466/2014/EU se besede „Vzhodna Evropa: Republika Moldavija, Ukrajina“ nadomestijo z besedami „Vzhodna Evropa: Belorusija, Republika Moldavija, Ukrajina“.
OJ L 135, 8.5.2014, p. 1.
UL L 135, 8.5.2014, str. 1.
Commission Decision (EU) 2016/1610
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/1610
of 7 September 2016
z dne 7. septembra 2016
on the publication with a restriction in the Official Journal of the European Union of the reference of harmonised standard EN 13383-1:2002 ‘Armourstone: Part 1: Specifications’ in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o omejeni objavi sklica na harmonizirani standard EN 13383-1:2002 „Kamen za obloge pri vodnih zgradbah in drugih gradbenih delih – 1. del: Specifikacija“ v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 305/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v Uradnem listu Evropske unije
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing Council Directive 89/106/EEC [1], and in particular Article 18 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 305/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 2011 o določitvi usklajenih pogojev za trženje gradbenih proizvodov in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 89/106/EGS [1] ter zlasti člena 18 Uredbe,
Pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, harmonised standards foreseen in Article 17 are to fulfil the requirements of the harmonised system set out in or by means of this Regulation.
Harmonizirani standardi, predvideni v členu 17, naj bi v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 305/2011 izpolnjevali zahteve harmoniziranega sistema, določenega v tej uredbi ali s to uredbo.
In May 2002, the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) adopted the harmonised standard EN 13383-1:2002 ‘Armourstone: Part 1: Specifications’.
Evropski odbor za standardizacijo (CEN) je maja 2002 sprejel harmonizirani standard EN 13383-1:2002 „Kamen za obloge pri vodnih zgradbah in drugih gradbenih delih – 1. del: Specifikacija“.
The reference of the standard was subsequently published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Sklic na ta standard je bil nato objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
On 12 August 2015 Cyprus launched a formal objection in accordance with Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 in respect of the harmonised standard EN 13383-1:2002.
Ciper je 12. avgusta 2015 v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe (EU) št. 305/2011 vložil uradni ugovor v zvezi s harmoniziranim standardom EN 13383-1:2002.
The formal objection was based on the inclusion in Clause 5.2 of this standard of a threshold level for one essential characteristic, density, defining the minimum density of the products in question as 2,3 Mg/m3.
Uradni ugovor je temeljil na vključitvi mejne vrednosti za eno bistveno značilnost, tj. gostoto, v klavzulo 5.2 tega standarda, in sicer je bila minimalna gostota zadevnih proizvodov opredeljena na ravni 2,3 Mg/m3.
According to Cyprus, the amounts of armourstone quarried in Cyprus and fulfilling the threshold level (the said minimum density) are not sufficient to respond to the demand for these products.
Po navedbah Cipra količine kamna za obloge pri vodnih zgradbah in drugih gradbenih delih, ki se pridobiva na Cipru in izpolnjuje zahtevo glede mejne vrednosti (navedeno minimalno gostoto), ne ustrezajo povpraševanju po teh proizvodih.
Instead, the Cypriot authorities have successfully used for the construction of coastal protection works during several decades armourstone with a lesser density, according to them without any durability and/or stability problems.
Namesto tega ciprski organi za gradnjo objektov za zaščito obale že več desetletij uspešno uporabljajo kamen za obloge pri vodnih zgradbah in drugih gradbenih delih z manjšo gostoto, po njihovem mnenju brez težav s trajnostjo in/ali stabilnostjo.
Besides, the CEN bodies involved have stated that the assessment of durability is covered adequately in EN 13383 by other durability tests, even without the said threshold level being applied for density.
Poleg tega so zadevni organi odbora CEN navedli, da je ocena trajnosti ustrezno zajeta v EN 13383 z drugimi preskusi trajnost, tudi če se navedena mejna vrednost za gostoto ne uporabi.
Moreover, Cyprus emphasised that the removal of the threshold level in question has already passed the formal vote in CEN in the context of developing a new version of EN 13383.
Ciper je tudi poudaril, da je bila odprava zadevne mejne vrednosti že uradno izglasovana v odboru CEN v okviru priprave nove različice standarda EN 13383.
The density of armourstone plays a part as an essential characteristic in the fulfilment of basic requirements for construction works, related to the design of coastal protection works.
Gostota kamna za obloge pri vodnih zgradbah in drugih gradbenih delih ima bistveno vlogo pri izpolnjevanju osnovnih zahtev za gradbene objekte, povezanih z oblikovanjem objektov za zaščito obale.
However, the calculation formulas used in this context comprise also other factors, notably the dimensions and the size for armourstone to be used.
Vendar formule za izračun, uporabljene v zvezi s tem, zajemajo tudi druge dejavnike, zlasti dimenzije in velikost kamna za obloge pri vodnih zgradbah in drugih gradbenih delih, ki naj bi se uporabljal.
It has been demonstrated that the same protection levels can be attained with armourstone of lesser density, when this is compensated by using stone blocks of larger size.
Dokazano je bilo, da je mogoče doseči enake ravni zaščite s kamnom za obloge pri vodnih zgradbah in drugih gradbenih delih z manjšo gostoto, če se to kompenzira z uporabo večjih kamnitih blokov.
On the basis of the contents of EN 13383-1:2002 as well as the information submitted by Cyprus, by the other Member States, by CEN and by industry, and after consulting the committee established by Article 64 of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011, as foreseen in Article 18 of this Regulation, it is widely agreed that the threshold level for density set in Clause 5.2 of this standard could be excluded from the scope of the reference published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Na podlagi vsebine standarda EN 13383-1:2002 in informacij, ki so jih predložili Ciper, druge države članice, odbor CEN in industrija, ter po posvetovanju z odborom, ustanovljenim s členom 64 Uredbe (EU) št. 305/2011, kot je določeno v členu 18 navedene uredbe, obstaja splošno soglasje, da se mejna vrednost za gostoto, določena v klavzuli 5.2 tega standarda, lahko izključi iz področja uporabe sklica, objavljenega v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
For all these reasons, the threshold level for density set in Clause 5.2 of this standard is not necessary for the fulfilment of the requirements set out in or by means of Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 for this harmonised standard.
Zaradi vseh teh razlogov mejna vrednost za gostoto iz klavzule 5.2 tega standarda ni potrebna za izpolnitev zahtev, določenih v Uredbi (EU) št. 305/2011 ali z navedeno uredbo za ta harmonizirani standard.
The reference of EN 13383-1:2002 should thus continue to be published in the Official Journal of the European Union, but with a restriction excluding the threshold level for density set in Clause 5.2 of this standard from its scope,
Zato bi se sklic na standard EN 13383-1:2002 moral še naprej objavljati v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, vendar z omejitvijo, s katero je iz področja uporabe sklica izključena mejna vrednost za gostoto iz klavzule 5.2 tega standarda –
The reference of harmonised standard EN 13383-1:2002 ‘Armourstone: Part 1: Specifications’ shall be published with a restriction in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Sklic na harmonizirani standard EN 13383-1:2002 „Kamen za obloge pri vodnih zgradbah in drugih gradbenih delih – 1. del: Specifikacija“ se z omejitvijo objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This restriction shall exclude the threshold level for density set in Clause 5.2 of this standard from the scope of the reference published.
Ta omejitev izključuje mejno vrednost za gostoto, določeno v klavzuli 5.2 tega standarda, iz področja uporabe objavljenega sklica.
Done at Brussels, 7 September 2016.
V Bruslju, 7. septembra 2016
OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p.
UL L 88, 4.4.2011, str.
Commission Decision (EU) 2016/1621
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/1621
adopting a guidance document on notification to accreditation and licensing bodies by environmental verifiers active in a Member State other than that where the accreditation or licence was granted under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o sprejetju navodil za uradno obvestilo, ki ga organom za akreditiranje in licenciranje pošljejo okoljski preveritelji, dejavni v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri je bila podeljena akreditacija ali licenca, v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1221/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2016) 5648)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2016) 5648)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) repealing Regulation (EC) No 761/2001 and Commission Decisions 2001/681/EC and 2006/193/EC [1], and in particular Article 30(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1221/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009 o prostovoljnem sodelovanju organizacij v Sistemu Skupnosti za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS), razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 761/2001 ter odločb Komisije 2001/681/ES in 2006/193/ES [1] ter zlasti člena 30(6) Uredbe,
Article 30(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 establishes the possibility for the Forum of the Accreditation and Licensing Bodies to develop guidance on issues in the field of the competence of accreditation and licensing bodies in order to harmonise the procedures applied by those bodies for accreditation or licensing and supervision of environmental verifiers.
Člen 30(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1221/2009 določa možnost, da forum organov za akreditiranje in licenciranje pripravi navodila glede vprašanj, ki so v pristojnosti organov za akreditiranje in licenciranje, da bi uskladil postopke, ki jih ti organi uporabljajo za akreditiranje ali licenciranje in nadzor okoljskih preveriteljev.
Environmental verifiers operating in different Member States are required to notify their activities to the relevant accreditation and licensing bodies in accordance with Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009.
Okoljski preveritelji, ki delujejo v različnih državah članicah, morajo o svojih dejavnostih uradno obvestiti ustrezne organe za akreditiranje in licenciranje v skladu s členom 24 Uredbe (ES) št. 1221/2009.
The practical execution of that notification procedure has revealed that the response of individual accreditation and licensing bodies to environmental verifiers who fail to respect their notification obligations differs.
Med praktičnim izvajanjem navedenega postopka za uradno obvestilo se je izkazalo, da se odgovori posameznih organov za akreditiranje in licenciranje okoljskim preveriteljem, ki ne spoštujejo svojih obveznosti uradnega obveščanja, razlikujejo.
Consequently, additional guidance is needed to ensure consistent application of the notification procedures, in the context of environmental verifiers accredited or licensed in one Member State performing verification and validation activities in another Member State.
Zato so za dosledno uporabo postopkov za uradno obvestilo potrebna dodatna navodila, ko okoljski preveritelji, ki so akreditirani ali licencirani v eni državi članici, opravljajo dejavnosti preverjanja in potrjevanja v drugi državi članici.
The guidance document on notification to accreditation and licensing bodies by environmental verifiers under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 as set out in the Annex is adopted.
Sprejmejo se navodila za uradno obvestilo, določena v Prilogi, ki ga organom za akreditiranje in licenciranje pošljejo okoljski preveritelji v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1221/2009.
Guidance document on notification to accreditation and licensing bodies by environmental verifiers active in a Member State other than that where the accreditation or licence was granted under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009
Navodila za uradno obvestilo, ki ga organom za akreditiranje in licenciranje pošljejo okoljski preveritelji, dejavni v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri je bila podeljena akreditacija ali licenca, v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1221/2009