natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In taking on and acting in this capacity, he has therefore actively supported actions and policies which undermine the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, and further destabilised the country.
Datum rojstva: 25.7.1978 (ali 23.3.1975)
DOB: 27.1.1974
Kraj rojstva: Krasni Luč, Vorošilovgrad, območje Luganska
So-called ‘Minister of Revenue and Taxes’ of the ‘Donetsk People's Republic’.
T. i. generalni tožilec „Ljudske republike Lugansk“.
POB: Kherson
„Всевеликое Войско Донское“
So-called ‘Minister of Communications’ of the so-called ‘Donetsk People's Republic’.
Uradno spletno mesto:
DOB: 10.12.1976
Telefonska številka:
Former so-called ‘Minister of Economic Development and Trade’ of the so-called ‘Lugansk People's Republic’.
Družbeni mediji:
DOB: 25.7.1978 (or 23.3.1975)
Kozaška narodna garda
So-called ‘General Prosecutor’ of the so-called ‘Lugansk People's Republic’.
„Velika donska vojska“ je ustanovila „Kozaško narodno gardo“, ki je odgovorna za boj proti silam ukrajinske vlade v vzhodni Ukrajini in s tem ogroža ozemeljsko nedotakljivost, suverenost in neodvisnost Ukrajine ter njeno stabilnost in varnost.
LIST OF ENTITIES
Povezana z Nikolajem KOZICINOM, poveljnikom kozaških sil, odgovornim za poveljevanje separatistom v vzhodni Ukrajini, ki se bojujejo proti silam ukrajinske vlade.
‘Всевеликое Войско Донское’
„Bataljon Vostok“,
Official website:
„Батальон Восток“
Phone number:
Nezakonita oborožena separatistična skupina, ki naj bi bila med najpomembnejšimi v vzhodni Ukrajini.
Social media:
Odgovorna za boj proti silam ukrajinske vlade v vzhodni Ukrajini, s čimer ogroža stabilnost in varnost Ukrajine.
Cossack National Guard
Dejavno sodelovala v vojaških operacijah pri zavzetju letališča v Donecku.
Address: 346465 Russia Rostov Region.
Domnevno del t. i.
Str Shosseynaya 1
Prvega korpusa kopenske vojske „Ljudske republike Doneck“.
The ‘Great Don army’ established the ‘Cossack National Guard’, responsible for fighting against the Ukrainian government forces in Eastern Ukraine, thus undermining the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine as well as threatening the stability or security of Ukraine.
Državno unitarno podjetje Republike Krim „Državni vinogradniški zavod ‚Magarač‘“
Associated with Mr Nikolay KOZITSYN, who is Commander of Cossack forces and responsible for commanding separatists in Eastern Ukraine fighting against the Ukrainian government forces.
(prej „Državno podjetje Magarač Državnega vinogradniškega inštituta“
‘Батальон Восток’
Gosudarstvenoye predpriyatiye „Agrofirma Magarach“ nacionalnogo instituta vinograda i vina „Magarach“)
http://vk.com/patriotic_forces_of_donbas
Lastništvo subjekta je bilo preneseno v nasprotju z ukrajinskim pravom.
Illegal armed separatist group which is considered to be one of the most important in Eastern Ukraine.
„Predsedstvo krimskega parlamenta“ je 9. aprila 2014 sprejelo sklep št. 1991-6/14 „o spremembi resolucije Državnega sveta Republike Krim“ z dne 26. marca 2014 št. 1836-6/14 „o nacionalizaciji premoženja podjetij, ustanov in organizacij kmetijske industrije na ozemlju Republike Krim“, v katerem je v imenu „Republike Krim“ razglasilo prevzem premoženja, ki pripada državnemu podjetju „Magarač“ Državnega vinogradniškega zavoda („Gosudarstvenoye predpriyatiye“ ‚Agrofirma Magarach‘ „nacionalnogo instituta vinograda i vina ‚Magarach‘“).
Responsible for fighting against the Ukrainian government forces in Eastern Ukraine, thus threatening the stability or security of Ukraine.
To podjetje so krimske „oblasti“ s tem dejansko zaplenile.
Actively participated in the military operations resulting in the seizure of Donetsk Airport.
S sklepom t. i.
Reportedly part of the so-called ‘1st Army Corps’ of the ‘Donetsk People's Republic’.
Sveta ministrov „Republike Krim“ je bil januarja 2016 status podjetja iz državnega podjetja „Agrofirma Magarach“ spremenjen v državno unitarno podjetje „Republike Krim“ „Kmetijsko podjetje Magarač“.
State Unitary Enterprise of the Republic of Crimea ‘National Institute of Wine “Magarach”’
Oborožena separatistična skupina, ki je dejavno podpirala dejanja, ki spodkopavajo ozemeljsko nedotakljivost, suverenost in neodvisnost Ukrajine ter jo dodatno destabilizirajo.
(formerly known as ‘State enterprise Magarach of the national institute of wine’
Skupina se povezuje z osebo, uvrščeno na seznam, saj ji poveljuje Nikolaj KOZICIN.
Государственное предприятие Агрофирма ‘Магарач’ Национального института винограда и вина ‘Магарач’
Domnevno del t. i.
Gosudarstvenoye predpriyatiye ‘Agrofirma Magarach’ nacionalnogo instituta vinograda i vina ‘Magarach’)
Drugega korpusa kopenske vojske „Ljudske republike Lugansk“.
The ownership of the entity was transferred contrary to the Ukrainian law.
(Батальон „Спарта“)
The enterprise is thus effectively confiscated by the Crimean ‘authorities’.
(Батальон „Сомали“)
Re-registered on 15 January 2015 as State Unitary Enterprise of the Republic of Crimea ‘National Institute of Wine “Magarach”’ (ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ БЮДЖЕТНОЕ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЕ РЕСПУБЛИКИ КРЫМ «НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ НАУЧНО-ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЙ ИНСТИТУТ ВИНОГРАДА И ВИНА «МАГАРАЧ»).
Skupina se povezuje z osebo, uvrščeno na seznam, saj ji poveljuje Mihail TOLSTIK, tudi Givi.
Founder: The Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Crimea (МИНИСТЕРСТВО СЕЛЬСКОГО ХОЗЯЙСТВА РЕСПУБЛИКИ КРЫМ).
(Батальон „Заря“)
Following a decision of the so-called ‘Cabinet of Ministers’ of the ‘Republic of Crimea’, the status of the company was in January 2016 changed from state enterprise ‘Agrofirma Magarach’ to state unitary enterprise of the ‘Republic of Crimea’ ‘Agrarian Company of Magarach’.
(Бригада „Призрак“)
POB: St Petersburg (former Leningrad) Speaker of the State Duma.
(Александр Юрьевич ТИМОФЕЕВ)
Publicly supported the deployment of Russian forces in Ukraine.
(Виктор Вячеславович ЯЦЕНКО)
Publicly supported the Russia-Crimea reunification treaty and the related federal constitutional law.
(Ольга Игорева БЕСЕДИНА)
Aide to the President of the Russian Federation.
(Заур Рауфович ИСМАИЛОВ)
POB: Bandurovo, Kirovograd region, Ukrainian SSR Deputy Prime Minister.
(Александр Аркадьевич Калюсский),
Responsible for the implementation of the constitutional prerogatives of the Russian Head of State on the territory of the annexed Autonomous Republic of Crimea.
(Павел Юрьевич Губарев),
Deputy Chairman of State Duma, United Russia.
(Сергей Юрьевич Козьяков),
Responsible for initiating legislation to integrate the annexed Autonomous Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation.
Naslov: 346465 Russia, območje Rostova.
Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, First Deputy Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation, General of the Army.
Okrožje Oktober (C).
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1674
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/1674
exempting retail supply of electricity and gas in Germany from the application of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
o izvzetju maloprodaje električne energije in plina v Nemčiji iz uporabe Direktive 2014/25/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2016) 5779)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2016) 5779)
Having regard to Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC [1], and in particular Article 34(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2014/25/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. februarja 2014 o javnem naročanju naročnikov, ki opravljajo dejavnosti v vodnem, energetskem in prometnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev, ter o razveljavitvi Direktive 2004/17/ES [1] in zlasti člena 34(3) Direktive,
Having regard to the request submitted by the association of undertakings in the German energy and water sectors Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e.V.
ob upoštevanju zahtevka, ki ga je združenje podjetij v nemškem energetskem in vodnem sektorju Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e.V.
(hereinafter referred to as ‘BDEW’) by email of 21 March 2016,
(v nadaljnjem besedilu: združenje BDEW) po podalo po e-pošti 21. marca 2016,
FACTS
DEJANSKO STANJE
On 21 March 2016, BDEW transmitted a request pursuant to Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Request’) to the Commission by email.
Združenje BDEW je 21. marca 2016 Komisiji po e-pošti poslalo zahtevek v skladu s členom 35 Direktive 2014/25/EU (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zahtevek).
The Request submitted by BDEW, an association representing undertakings in the German energy and water sector which are considered as contracting entities in the meaning of Article 4 of Directive 2014/25/EU, concerns the following activities, as described in the Request:
Zahtevek, ki ga je predložilo združenje BDEW, združenje, ki predstavlja podjetja v nemškem energetskem in vodnem sektorju, ki se štejejo za naročnike v smislu člena 4 Direktive 2014/25/EU, zadeva naslednje dejavnosti, kot so opisane v zahtevku:
retail supply of electricity to customers whose electricity consumption is recorded by consumption metering (registrierende Leistungsmessung — hereinafter referred to as ‘RLM customers’) and the customers whose electricity consumption is charged on the basis of a standard load profile (hereinafter referred to as ‘SLP customers’), with the exception of SLP customers supplied under default supply conditions set by law and of the heating electricity market;
maloprodajo električne energije odjemalcem, katerih poraba električne energije se evidentira z meritvami porabe („registrierende Leistungsmessung“ – v nadaljnjem besedilu: odjemalci RLM), in odjemalcem, katerih poraba električne energije se zaračunava na podlagi standardnega profila obremenitve (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odjemalci SLP), razen odjemalcem SLP, ki se oskrbujejo pod standardnimi pogoji dobave, kot jih določata zakonodaja in trg z električno energijo za ogrevanje;
retail supply of gas to RLM and SLP customers, except those supplied under default supply conditions set by law;
maloprodajo plina odjemalcem RLM in SLP, razen odjemalcem, ki se oskrbujejo pod standardnimi pogoji dobave, določenimi z zakonodajo.
The Request was accompanied by an opinion of the German Federal Cartel Office — Bundeskartellamt (hereinafter referred to as ‘BKartA’) dated 11 December 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Opinion’).
Zahtevku je bilo priloženo mnenje nemškega zveznega urada za varstvo konkurence – Bundeskartellamt (v nadaljnjem besedilu: BKartA) z dne 11. decembra 2015 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: mnenje).
In this Opinion, BKartA assesses the retail supply markets for electricity and gas and concludes that the conditions for exemption are met for the retail supply of electricity and gas of RLM and SLP customers.
BKartA v tem mnenju ocenjuje trge za maloprodajo električne energije in plina ter ugotavlja, da so izpolnjeni pogoji za izvzetje maloprodaje električne energije in plina odjemalcem RLM in SLP.
Directive 2014/25/EU applies to the award of contracts for the pursuit of activities related to the retail supply of electricity and gas, unless this activity is exempted pursuant to Article 34 of that Directive.
Direktiva 2014/25/EU se uporablja za oddajo javnih naročil za opravljanje dejavnosti, povezanih z maloprodajo električne energije in plina, razen če je ta dejavnost izvzeta v skladu s členom 34 navedene direktive.
Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU provides that contracts intended to enable the performance of one of the activities to which the Directive applies shall not be subject to the Directive if, in the Member State in which it is carried out, the activity is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted.
Člen 34 Direktive 2014/25/EU določa, da se za javna naročila, katerih namen je omogočiti izvajanje ene od dejavnosti, za katere velja Direktiva, Direktiva ne uporablja, če je dejavnost v državi članici, v kateri se opravlja, neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen.
Direct exposure to competition is assessed on the basis of objective criteria, taking account of the specific characteristics of the sector concerned.
Neposredna izpostavljenost konkurenci se ocenjuje na podlagi objektivnih meril ob upoštevanju posebnih značilnosti zadevnega sektorja.
Free access to the market
Prost dostop do trga
This legislation is listed in Annex III of Directive 2014/25/EU.
Ta zakonodaja je navedena v Prilogi III k Direktivi 2014/25/EU.
For the electricity sector, it refers to Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
V zvezi s sektorjem električne energije se nanaša na Direktivo 2009/72/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2].
For the gas sector, it refers to Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
V zvezi s sektorjem plina se nanaša na Direktivo 2009/73/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3].
Germany has transposed Directives 2009/72/EC and 2009/73/EC in the national law on the energy industry — Energiewirtschaftgesetz (hereinafter referred to as ‘EnWG’).
Nemčija je direktivi 2009/72/ES in 2009/73/ES prenesla z nacionalnim zakonom o energetiki – „Energiewirtschaftgesetz“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EnWG).
The sale of electricity and gas is regulated in Part 4, Article 36 et seq. of EnWG.
Prodajo električne energije in plina urejajo člen 36 in naslednji členi iz dela 4 EnWG.
The German Electricity Default Supply Regulation — Stromgrundversorgungsverordnung (hereinafter referred to as ‘StromGVV’) [4] and the Gas Default Supply Regulation — Gasgrundversorgungsverordnung (hereinafter referred to as ‘GasGVV’) [5] also contain special statutory regulations for the sale of electricity and gas.
Nemška uredba o osnovni dobavi električne energije – „Stromgrundversorgungsverordnung“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba StromGVV) [4] in uredba o osnovni dobavi plina – „Gasgrundversorgungsverordnung“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba GasGVV) [5] vsebujeta tudi posebne zakonske določbe o prodaji električne energije in plina.
Consequently, and in accordance with Article 34(1), access to the market should be deemed not to be restricted on the entire territory of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Na podlagi tega in v skladu s členom 34(1) se šteje, da dostop do trga na celotnem ozemlju Zvezne republike Nemčije ni omejen.
Direct exposure to competition
Neposredna izpostavljenost konkurenci
Direct exposure to competition should be evaluated on the basis of various indicators, none of which are, per se, decisive.
Neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci bi bilo treba oceniti na podlagi različnih kazalnikov, od katerih sam po sebi nobeden ni odločilen.
Given the characteristics of the markets concerned, further criteria should also be taken into account.
Glede na značilnosti zadevnih trgov bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi druga merila.
Although a narrower or a broader market definition might be envisaged in certain cases, the precise definition of the relevant market can be left open for the purposes of this Decision to the extent that the result of the analysis remains the same whether it is based on a narrow or a broad definition.
Čeprav bi v nekaterih primerih lahko prišla v poštev ožja ali širša opredelitev trga, lahko natančna opredelitev zadevnega trga ostane odprta za namene tega sklepa v tolikšnem obsegu, da rezultat analize ostane enak ne glede na to, ali izhaja iz ozke ali široke opredelitve.
This Decision is without prejudice to the application of the rules on competition and other fields of Union law.
Ta sklep ne posega v uporabo pravil o konkurenci in na druga področja prava Unije.
In particular, the criteria and the methodology used to assess direct exposure to competition under Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU are not necessarily identical to those used to perform an assessment under Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty or Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [6].
Zlasti merila in metodologija, uporabljena pri oceni neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci v skladu s členom 34 Direktive 2014/25/EU, niso nujno enaka tistim, uporabljenim pri oceni v skladu s členom 101 ali 102 Pogodbe ali Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 [6].
This point was upheld also by the General Court in a recent judgment [7].
Ta vidik je potrdilo tudi Splošno sodišče v nedavni sodbi [7].
It should be kept in mind that the aim of this Decision is to establish whether the services concerned by the Request are exposed to such a level of competition (in markets to which access is not restricted within the meaning of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU) which will ensure that, also in the absence of the discipline brought about by the detailed procurement rules set out in Directive 2014/25/EU, procurement for the pursuit of the activities concerned will be carried out in a transparent, non-discriminatory manner based on criteria allowing purchasers to identify the solution which overall is the economically most advantageous one.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba, da je cilj tega sklepa ugotoviti, ali so storitve, na katere se nanaša zahtevek, izpostavljene takšni stopnji konkurence (na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen v smislu člena 34 Direktive 2014/25/EU), ki bo tudi ob odsotnosti discipline, dosežene s podrobnimi pravili javnega naročanja iz Direktive 2014/25/EU, zagotovila pregledno in nediskriminacijsko izvajanje javnih naročil za opravljanje zadevnih dejavnosti na podlagi meril, ki naročnikom omogočajo ugotoviti, katera rešitev je ekonomsko najugodnejša.
Electricity retail supply
Maloprodaja električne energije
Based on Commission precedents, the relevant product market for the supply of electricity at the retail level is the electricity retail market [8].
Na podlagi predhodnih odločitev Komisije je upoštevni proizvodni trg za dobavo električne energije na maloprodajni ravni maloprodajni trg z električno energijo [8].
As regards the supply of electricity to end-customers, the Commission differentiates between supply to small customers (private residential, small businesses) and supply to large industrial customers connected to the high and medium voltage grid (industry and large commercial consumers) [9].
V zvezi z dobavo električne energije končnim odjemalcem Komisija razlikuje med dobavo malim odjemalcem (zasebnim gospodinjskim odjemalcem, malim podjetjem) in dobavo velikim industrijskim odjemalcem, ki so priključeni na visoko- in srednjenapetostno omrežje (industrijski in veliki komercialni odjemalci) [9].
This differentiation is related to the different requirements and profiles on the demand side and the different services and technologies on the supply side [10].
To razlikovanje je povezano z različnimi zahtevami in profili na strani povpraševanja ter različnimi storitvami in tehnologijami na strani dobave [10].
Like the Commission, the BKartA also differentiates between small and large electricity supply customers on the basis of their different consumption behaviour [11].
Tudi BKartA, podobno kot Komisija, razlikuje med malimi in velikimi odjemalci električne energije glede na njihove različne vzorce porabe [11].
In so doing, it differentiates between customers whose electricity consumption is recorded by consumption metering (‘RLM customers’) and customers whose electricity consumption is charged on the basis of a standard load profile (‘SLP customers’).
Pri tem razlikuje med odjemalci, katerih poraba električne energije se evidentira z meritvami porabe (odjemalci RLM), in odjemalci, katerih poraba električne energije se zaračunava na podlagi standardnega profila obremenitve (odjemalci SLP).
RLM customers have an annual consumption of more than 100 MWh and are therefore, as a rule, industrial or large commercial consumers [12].
Odjemalci RLM letno porabijo več kot 100 MWh in se zato praviloma štejejo za industrijske ali velike komercialne odjemalce [12].
Because of the high costs associated with RLM, this is only worthwhile once high consumption volumes are reached.
Ker so z RLM povezani visoki stroški, se to izplača le pri velikem obsegu porabe.
The use of electricity as a production and cost factor is characteristic of RLM customers.
Za odjemalce RLM je značilna uporaba električne energije kot dejavnika proizvodnje in stroškov.
For this group of customers, the use of electricity is a characteristic production and cost factor in their own production.
Za to skupino odjemalcev je uporaba električne energije značilen dejavnik proizvodnje in stroškov v okviru njihove lastne proizvodnje.
Demand is essentially oriented and structured differently from that of SLP customers [13].
Povpraševanje je usmerjeno in strukturirano bistveno drugače kot pri odjemalcih SLP [13].
SLP customers are electricity users with relatively low consumption volumes.
Odjemalci SLP so uporabniki električne energije z razmeroma majhno porabo.
They are residential customers (with a consumption up to 10000 KWh annually) and small businesses (with an annual electricity consumption of up to 100 MWh) within the meaning of Section 3 No 22 of the German Energy Industry Law (EnWG), who buy energy primarily for their own consumption in the home or for their own consumption for professional, agricultural or business purposes [14].
Mednje spadajo gospodinjski odjemalci (z letno porabo do 10000 KWh) in mala podjetja (z letno porabo električne energije do 100 MWh) v smislu oddelka 3 nemškega zakona o energetiki št. 22 (EnWG), ki kupujejo električno energijo predvsem za lastno porabo doma ali lastno porabo za poklicne, kmetijske ali poslovne namene [14].
The BKartA defines three further separate product markets for the supply of SLP customers [15]:
V BKartA so opredeljeni trije dodatni ločeni proizvodni trgi za oskrbo odjemalcev SLP [15]:
The market for the supply of SLP customers under general conditions and at general tariffs pursuant to Articles 36 and 38 EnWG [16] as default and auxiliary supply is an almost entirely legally stipulated and designed product.
trg za oskrbo odjemalcev SLP pod splošnimi pogoji in po splošnih tarifah v skladu s členoma 36 in 38 EnWG [16], saj je osnovna in zasilna dobava skoraj v celoti zakonsko urejen in zasnovan proizvod.
The contract for SLP default supply customers is not negotiated between the parties; instead, the contract comes into effect between the end-customer and the statutory supplier pursuant to Article 2(2) of the German Electricity Default Supply Regulation (StromGVV) as soon as electricity is used.
Pogodbe za osnovno dobavo odjemalcem SLP ne skleneta stranki, temveč začne veljati med končnim odjemalcem in zakonsko določenim dobaviteljem v skladu s členom 2(2) nemške uredbe o osnovni dobavi električne energije (uredba StromGVV) takoj po začetku uporabe električne energije;
The market for the supply of SLP customers outside general conditions and tariffs (special contract customers), for which distinct price differences in comparison to default supply customers have evolved [17].
trg za oskrbo odjemalcev SLP pod drugimi pogoji in po drugih tarifah (odjemalci s posebno pogodbo), za katere so se v primerjavi z odjemalci z osnovno dobavo izoblikovale izrazite razlike v ceni [17];
The market for the supply of SLP customers within general conditions and tariffs with electricity for space heating (heating electricity market), which is subject to significant fluctuations depending on the time of year, but is required in much larger volumes at peak times than household electricity, resulting in substantial price differences, which rules out substitution by the other products referred to [18].
trg za oskrbo odjemalcev SLP v okviru splošnih pogojev in tarif z električno energijo za ogrevanje prostorov (trg z električno energijo za ogrevanje), na katerem so velika nihanja glede na letni čas, vendar je v času največje porabe povpraševanje veliko večje od povpraševanja gospodinjstev po električni energiji, to pa povzroča velike razlike v cenah, zaradi česar ni mogoča zamenjava z drugimi navedenimi proizvodi [18].
The Request covers the market for the supply of RLM customers and SLP special contract customers with electricity.
Zahtevek vključuje trg za dobavo električne energije odjemalcem RLM in odjemalcem SLP s posebno pogodbo.