natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Council Regulation (EC) No 847/96 of 6 May 1996 introducing additional conditions for year-to-year management of TACs and quotas (OJ L 115, 9.5.1996, p.
Za namene te uredbe je podana naslednja korelacijska preglednica latinskih in splošnih imen:
3).
Znanstveno ime
Regulation (EU) No 1343/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on certain provisions for fishing in the GFCM (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean) Agreement area and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 concerning management measures for the sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea (OJ L 347, 30.12.2011, p.
Tričrkovna koda
44).
Splošno ime
ANNEX
romb
TACs APPLICABLE TO UNION VESSELS IN AREAS WHERE TACs EXIST BY SPECIES AND BY AREA
papalina
The following tables set out the TACs and quotas (in tonnes live weight, except where otherwise specified) by stock and conditions functionally linked thereto.
Vrsta:
Fish stocks are referred to following the alphabetical order of the Latin names of the species.
Območje:
For the purposes of this Regulation, the following comparative table of Latin names and common names is provided:
vode Unije v Črnem morju
Scientific name
Bolgarija
Alpha-3 code
Romunija
Turbot
Ni relevantno
Sprat
Analitski TAC
Species:
Člen 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 847/96 se ne uporablja.
Union waters in the Black Sea
Od 15. aprila do 15. junija 2015 ni dovoljena nobena ribolovna dejavnost, vključno s pretovarjanjem, sprejemanjem na krov, iztovarjanjem in prvo prodajo.
TUR/F37.4.2.C.
Za ribolov na papalino se obveznost iztovarjanja iz člena 15 Uredbe (EU) št. 1380/2013 uporablja od 1. januarja 2015.
Bulgaria
Člen 16(2) navedene uredbe določa, da kadar se določi obveznost iztovarjanja za določen stalež, se ribolovne možnosti določijo tako, da se upošteva razlika med določanjem ribolovnih možnosti, ki odražajo iztovarjanje, in določanjem ribolovnih možnosti, ki odražajo ulove.
Romania
Da bi se izognili prekinitvi ribolovnih dejavnosti in da bi ribičem Unije zagotovili preživetje, bi bilo treba to uredbo uporabljati od 1. januarja 2015.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/107
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/107
The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data.
Standardna uvozna vrednost se izračuna vsak delovni dan v skladu s členom 136(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 543/2011 ob upoštevanju spremenljivih dnevnih podatkov.
Done at Brussels, 23 January 2015.
V Bruslju, 23. januarja 2015
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/108
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) 2015/108
Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and repealing Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 [1], and in particular Article 32(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 36/2012 z dne 18. januarja 2012 o omejevalnih ukrepih glede na razmere v Siriji in razveljavitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 442/2011 [1] ter zlasti člena 32(1) Uredbe,
By its judgments of 13 November 2014 in Cases T-653/11, T-654/11 and T-43/12, the General Court of the European Union annulled the Council's decision to include Aiman Jaber, Khaled Kaddour, Mohammed Hamcho and Hamcho International on the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.
Splošno sodišče Evropske unije je s sodbami z dne 13. novembra 2014 v zadevah T-653/11, T-654/11 in T-43/12, za nično razglasilo odločitev Sveta, da Aimana Jaberja, Khaleda Kaddourja, Mohammeda Hamcha in Hamcho International uvrsti na seznam oseb in subjektov, za katere veljajo omejevalni ukrepi, iz Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 36/2012.
Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 shall be amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga II k Uredbi (EU) št. 36/2012 se spremeni, kot je določeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
The following persons and entity shall be inserted in the list of persons and entities set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.
Na seznam oseb in subjektov iz Priloge II k Uredbi (EU) št. 36/2012 se dodajo naslednje osebe in subjekt:
I. LIST OF NATURAL AND LEGAL PERSONS, ENTITIES OR BODIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 14 AND ARTICLE 15(1)(a)
I. SEZNAM FIZIČNIH IN PRAVNIH OSEB, SUBJEKTOV ALI ORGANOV IZ ČLENOV 14 IN 15(1)(a)
Date of birth: 20 May 1966.
Datum rojstva: 20. maj 1966
(a.k.a.
Spletno mesto: www.hamshointl.com
Hamsho International Group)
E-naslov: info@hamshointl.com in hamshogroup@yahoo.com
Tel. +963 112316675
Hamcho International je velik sirski holding, ki je v lasti Mohammeda Hamcha.
Fax +963 112318875
Hamcho International podpira sirski režim in ima koristi od njega ter je povezan z osebo, ki podpira sirski režim in ima koristi od njega.
Website: www.hamshointl.com
Damask
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/109
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) 2015/109
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 of 12 April 2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire [1], and in particular Article 11a(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 560/2005 z dne 12. aprila 2005 o uvedbi določenih posebnih omejevalnih ukrepov zoper nekatere osebe in subjekte glede na razmere v Slonokoščeni obali [1] ter zlasti člena 11a(1) Uredbe,
On 12 April 2005, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 560/2005.
Svet je 12. aprila 2005 sprejel Uredbo (ES) št. 560/2005.
On 20 November 2014, the Sanctions Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1572 (2004) concerning Côte d'Ivoire deleted one person from the list of persons subject to the measures set out in paragraphs 9 to 12 of that Resolution.
Odbor za sankcije, ustanovljen v skladu z Resolucijo Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1572 (2004) o Slonokoščeni obali, je 20. novembra 2014 črtal eno osebo s seznama oseb, za katere veljajo ukrepi iz odstavkov 9 do 12 navedene resolucije.
The list of persons subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Seznam oseb, za katere veljajo omejevalni ukrepi, iz Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 560/2005 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga I k Uredbi (ES) št. 560/2005 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
OJ L 95, 14.4.2005, p. 1.
UL L 95, 14.4.2005, str. 1.
The entry in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 for the following person is deleted:
V Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 560/2005 se črta vnos za naslednjo osebo:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/110
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/110
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain welded tubes and pipes of iron or non-alloy steel originating in Belarus, the People's Republic of China and Russia and terminating the proceeding for imports of certain welded tubes and pipes of iron or non-alloy steel originating in Ukraine following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih varjenih cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla s poreklom iz Belorusije, Ljudske republike Kitajske in Rusije ter o zaključku postopka za uvoz nekaterih varjenih cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla s poreklom iz Ukrajine po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9(4) and Article 11(2) and (5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), zlasti člena 9(4) ter člena 11(2) in (5) Uredbe,
The Council, following an anti-dumping investigation (‘the previous investigation’), by Regulation (EC) No 1256/2008 [2], imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain welded tubes and pipes of iron or non-alloy steel currently falling within CN codes ex73063041, ex73063049, ex73063072 and ex73063077 originating in Belarus, the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’), Russia, Thailand and Ukraine (‘the definitive anti-dumping measures’).
Svet je po protidampinški preiskavi („prejšnja preiskava“) z Uredbo (ES) št. 1256/2008 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih varjenih cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex73063041, ex73063049, ex73063072 in ex73063077, s poreklom iz Belorusije, Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“), Rusije, Tajske in Ukrajine („dokončni protidampinški ukrepi“).
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty ranging between 10,1 % and 90,6 %.
Ukrepi so bili sprejeti kot dajatev ad valorem v obsegu od 10,1 % do 90,6 %.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [3] of the definitive anti-dumping measures in force, the Commission received on 18 September 2013 a request for the initiation of an expiry review of these measures pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [3] veljavnih dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov 18. septembra 2013 prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka teh ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by the Defence Committee of the welded steel tubes industry of the European Union (‘the applicant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion of the total Union production of welded tubes and pipes, in this case more than 25 %.
Zahtevek je vložil Zaščitni odbor industrije varjenih jeklenih cevi Evropske unije („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večji delež celotne proizvodnje varjenih cevi v Uniji, v tem primeru več kot 25 %.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 19 December 2013, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4] (‘the Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa in je 19. decembra 2013 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2012 to 30 September 2013 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava glede verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2012 do 30. septembra 2013 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2010 to the end of the review investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Proučevanje gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je potekalo v obdobju od 1. januarja 2010 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
The Commission officially advised the applicant, other known Union producers, exporting producers in Belarus, the PRC, Russia and Ukraine (‘the countries concerned’), unrelated importers and users known to be concerned, as well as representatives of the countries concerned of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila vložnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike iz Belorusije, LRK, Rusije in Ukrajine („zadevne države“), nepovezane uvoznike, uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in predstavnike zadevnih držav.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the Notice of Initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
Sampling in respect of exporting producers
Vzorčenje v zvezi s proizvajalci izvozniki
In view of the apparent large number of exporting producers in the PRC, Russia and Ukraine, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of Initiation, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK, Rusije in Ukrajine je bilo v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje.
In the end, the Commission did not receive sampling replies from exporting producers in the PRC.
Komisija ni prejela izpolnjenega vprašalnika za izbor vzorca od nobenega proizvajalca izvoznika iz LRK.
One sampling reply was received from one exporting producer in Ukraine.
Prejela je izpolnjen vprašalnik za izbor vzorca od enega proizvajalca izvoznika iz Ukrajine.
Three sampling replies were received from exporting producers in Russia.
Prejela je tri izpolnjene vprašalnike za izbor vzorca od proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Rusije.
Hence, the Commission considered that sampling of exporting producers was not necessary.
Zato je Komisija menila, da vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni potrebno.
Sampling in respect of importers and Union producers
Vzorčenje v zvezi z uvozniki in proizvajalci Unije
In view of the apparent large number of unrelated importers in the Union, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of Initiation, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi velikega števila nepovezanih uvoznikov Unije je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
Given that no reply has been received from any unrelated importer, sampling was not applied to unrelated importers.
Glede na to, da Komisija ni prejela nobenega izpolnjenega vprašalnika, se vzorčenje ni uporabilo za nepovezane uvoznike.
In view of the large number of Union producers involved in this proceeding, the Notice of Initiation announced that the Commission had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers for the determination of injury in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Ker je v postopek vključenih veliko proizvajalcev Unije, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku navedeno, da je Komisija za ugotovitev škode v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
That pre-selection had been made by using the information available to the Commission at initiation stage and it was based on the producers' sales volume, production volume and geographical location in the Union.
Ta predizbor je bil izveden na podlagi informacij, ki so bile Komisiji na voljo v začetni fazi, temeljil pa je na obsegu prodaje in proizvodnje ter geografski lokaciji proizvajalcev v Uniji.
The sample corresponded to the largest representative volume of production and sales which could be reasonably investigated within the time available, representing 52 % of the total production and sales to unrelated customers in the EU of the Union industry.
Vzorec je ustrezal največjemu reprezentativnemu obsegu proizvodnje in prodaje, ki ga je bilo mogoče v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati, tj. 52 % celotne proizvodnje in prodaje nepovezanim strankam v EU s strani industrije Unije.
In addition, the sample was representative in terms of geographical location of the companies as it covered four different Member States.
Poleg tega je bil vzorec reprezentativen z vidika geografske lokacije družb, saj je zajemal štiri različne države članice.
EU producers were consulted about the proposed sample on the date of publication of the Notice of Initiation.
Na dan objave obvestila o začetku so potekala posvetovanja v zvezi s predlaganim vzorcem s proizvajalci iz EU.
Given that no additional producers came forward and no comments were received on the sample, the proposed sample was confirmed.
Predlagani vzorec je bil potrjen, saj se ni javil noben dodaten proizvajalec, poleg tega pa tudi ni bilo pripomb v zvezi z vzorcem.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a determination of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping, likelihood of continuation or recurrence of injury and of the Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga, verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode ter za ugotovitev interesa Unije.
To this end, the Commission sent questionnaires to the exporting producers and Union producers selected in the sample.
Komisija je zato poslala vprašalnike proizvajalcem izvoznikom in proizvajalcem Unije, vključenim v vzorec.
producers in the Union:
proizvajalci Unije:
Arcelor Mittal Karvina, Czech Republic,
Arcelor Mittal Karvina, Češka,
Tata Steel UK Limited, Corby, UK;
Tata Steel UK Limited, Corby, Združeno kraljestvo;
exporting producer in Belarus:
proizvajalec izvoznik iz Belorusije:
Mogilev Metallurgical Works, Mogilev, Belarus;
Mogilev Metallurgical Works, Mogilev, Belorusija;
trader related to the exporting producer in Ukraine:
trgovec, povezan s proizvajalcem izvoznikom iz Ukrajine:
Interpipe Europe SA, Lugano, Switzerland;
Interpipe Europe SA, Lugano, Švica;
producer in Russia:
proizvajalec iz Rusije:
producer in the analogue country:
proizvajalec iz primerljive države:
B. PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
Johannesburg, Južna Afrika.
The product concerned is welded tubes and pipes, of iron or non-alloy steel, of circular cross-section and of an external diameter not exceeding 168,3 mm, excluding line pipe of a kind used for oil or gas pipelines, casing and tubing of a kind used in drilling for oil and gas, precision tubes and tubes and pipes with attached fittings suitable for conducting gases or liquids for use in civil aircraft, currently falling within CN codes ex73063041, ex73063049, ex73063072 and ex73063077, originating in Belarus, the PRC, Russia and Ukraine.
Zadevni izdelek
The investigation has shown that the different types of the product concerned all share the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and are basically used for the same purposes.
Zadevni izdelek so varjene cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla s krožnim prečnim prerezom in zunanjim premerom največ 168,3 mm, razen cevi za naftovode ali plinovode, zaščitne cevi („casing“) in proizvodne cevi („tubing“), ki se uporabljajo pri vrtanju za pridobivanje nafte ali plina, preciznih cevi in cevi, opremljenih s priborom (fiting), ustreznih za pretok plina ali tekočine, ki se uporablja za civilne zrakoplove, ki so trenutno uvrščene pod oznake KN ex73063041, ex73063049, ex73063072 in ex73063077, s poreklom iz Belorusije, LRK, Rusije in Ukrajine.
Like product
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo različne vrste zadevnega izdelka enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter se uporabljajo v enake namene.
The welded tubes and pipes produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry and the welded tubes and pipes produced and sold in the countries concerned and the analogue country were found to have essentially the same physical, chemical and technical characteristics and the same basic uses as the welded tubes and pipes produced in the countries concerned and sold for export to the Union.
Podobni izdelek
They are therefore considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da imajo varjene cevi, ki jih v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije, ter varjene cevi, ki se proizvajajo in prodajajo v zadevnih državah in primerljivi državi, v bistvu enake fizikalne, kemične in tehnične značilnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe kot varjene cevi, proizvedene v zadevnih državah in prodane za izvoz v Unijo.
C. LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
Zato se ti izdelki obravnavajo kot enaki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping from the four countries concerned.
C. VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA ALI PONOVITVE DAMPINGA
All the four countries under investigation exported negligible quantities of the product concerned during the review investigation period.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping iz štirih zadevnih držav zaradi izteka veljavnosti obstoječih ukrepov nadaljeval ali ponovil.
Therefore, there is no likelihood of continuation of dumping for any of the four countries under investigation.
Vse štiri države, ki so v preiskavi, so v OPP izvažale zanemarljive količine zadevnega izdelka.
The assessment was limited to the likelihood of recurrence of dumping using export prices to other third countries.
Zato nadaljevanje dampinga v nobeni od štirih držav, ki so v preiskavi, ni verjetno.
As in the previous investigation, exports to Belarus were disregarded for this purpose.
Ocena je bila omejena na verjetnost ponovitve dampinga ob uporabi izvoznih cen za druge tretje države.
NON-MARKET ECONOMY COUNTRIES
Kot v prejšnji preiskavi se izvoz v Belorusijo v ta namen ni upošteval.
Analogue Country
DRŽAVE BREZ TRŽNEGA GOSPODARSTVA
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, Belarus and the PRC are not considered market economy countries.
Primerljiva država
In the previous investigation, the USA was used as an analogue country for the purposes of establishing the normal value.
V skladu z določbami člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe Belorusija in LRK ne štejeta za državi s tržnim gospodarstvom.
In the Notice of Initiation the USA was envisaged to be used as an analogue country in this expiry review, as suggested by the applicant.
V prejšnji preiskavi so bile kot primerljiva država za določitev normalne vrednosti uporabljene ZDA.
The Commission received comments from Mogilev as well as from the Belarusian authorities.
V obvestilu o začetku je bilo predvideno, da se ZDA v tem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa uporabijo kot primerljiva država, kot je predlagal vložnik.
No comments were received from interested parties in the PRC.
Komisija je prejela pripombe družbe Mogilev in beloruskih oblasti.
The Belarusian parties argued USA was not an appropriate choice due to alleged links between the sole cooperating US producer and the Union industry.
Zainteresirane strani iz LRK niso poslale pripomb.
The Belarusian parties suggested to use Russia as analogue country as the Russian steel industry is allegedly similar to that of Belarus due to their common ties to the former Soviet Union.
Zainteresirane strani iz Belorusije so trdile, da ZDA niso ustrezna izbira zaradi domnevnih povezav med edinim sodelujočim ameriškim proizvajalcem in industrijo Unije.
However, the investigation established that the value of natural gas was not reflected properly in the cost of production of the sole cooperating producer in Russia (see recital 69 below).
Zainteresirane strani iz Belorusije so predlagale, naj se kot primerljiva država uporabi Rusija, saj naj bi bila ruska jeklarska industrija podobna beloruski zaradi njunih skupnih vezi z državami nekdanje Sovjetske zveze.
Moreover, the cooperation from this producer in Russia was not sufficient (see recital 61 below).
Vendar pa je preiskava pokazala, da se pri stroških proizvodnje edinega sodelujočega proizvajalca v Rusiji (glej uvodno izjavo 69) ni ustrezno upoštevala vrednost zemeljskega plina.
Therefore, the choice of Russia was not considered appropriate.
Poleg tega sodelovanje tega proizvajalca v Rusiji ne zadostuje (glej uvodno izjavo 61).
The Commission also identified other third countries exporting the product concerned to the Union.
Zato se Rusija ni štela kot primerna primerljiva država.
The Commission contacted producers in 14 known steel producing countries.
Komisija je tudi navedla druge tretje države, ki izvažajo zadevni izdelek v Unijo.