natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, in order to ensure proportionality, credit rating agencies that have fewer than 50 employees and that are not part of a group should be able to submit rating data every two months.
Vendar pa bi zaradi zagotavljanja sorazmernosti morale bonitetne agencije, ki imajo manj kot 50 zaposlenih in ki niso del skupine, podatke o bonitetnih ocenah sporočati vsaka dva meseca.
ESMA should still be able to require those credit ratings agencies to carry out reporting on a monthly basis, in the light of the number and type of their ratings, including the complexity of the credit analysis, the relevance of the rated instruments or issuers, and the eligibility of the ratings to be used for regulatory purposes.
ESMA bi lahko še vedno zahtevala, da takšne bonitetne agencije, glede na število in vrsto bonitetnih ocen ter zapletenost bonitetnih analiz, pomembnost ocenjevanih instrumentov ali izdajateljev in primernost bonitetnih ocen, da se uporabljajo za regulativne namene, poročajo mesečno.
In order to avoid duplicated data reporting, ESMA should use for its ongoing supervision the data already reported for the purposes of the ERP.
Da se poročanje ne bi podvajalo, bi morala ESMA za potrebe stalnega nadzora uporabiti podatke, ki so že bili sporočeni za objavo na Evropski platformi bonitetnega ocenjevanja.
Credit rating agencies should also be required, for the purposes of ongoing supervision, to report information in respect of those credit ratings and rating outlooks not reported for the purposes of the ERP.
Bonitetne agencije bi morale za potrebe stalnega nadzora sporočati tudi o informacijah v zvezi z bonitetnimi ocenami in pričakovanimi trendi glede bonitetnih ocen, ki niso bile sporočene za objavo na Evropski platformi bonitetnega ocenjevanja.
ESMA should use the data provided for the purposes of the ERP and for the purposes of its ongoing supervision to gather the information on the historical performance data that it should make available in the central repository in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
ESMA bi morala podatke, predložene za objavo na Evropski platformi bonitetnega ocenjevanja in za potrebe stalnega nadzora, uporabiti za zbiranje informacij o preteklih rezultatih, ki bi jih morala dati na voljo v centralnem registru v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009.
In order to further facilitate comparability and to ensure consistency with the data that has been reported in accordance with Delegated Regulation (EU) No 448/2012, newly certified credit rating agencies should be required to submit data regarding at least 10 years before their certification, or the period since the start of their activity.
Da se nadalje poveča primerljivost in zagotovi skladnost s podatki, sporočenimi v skladu z Delegirano uredbo (EU) št. 448/2012, bi bilo treba od na novo certificiranih bonitetnih agencij zahtevati, naj predložijo podatke za zadnjih deset let pred njihovim certificiranjem ali za obdobje od začetka opravljanja dejavnosti.
Certified credit rating agencies should not be required to report this data, partially or totally, where they can demonstrate that this would not be proportionate in view of their scale and complexity.
Certificiranim bonitetnim agencijam ni treba sporočiti navedenih podatkov (delno ali v celoti), če dokažejo, da to zaradi njihovega obsega in kompleksnosti ne bi bilo sorazmerno.
Credit rating agencies that are part of a group should be able to either report their ratings data separately to ESMA, or mandate one of the agencies within the group to submit the data on their behalf.
Bonitetne agencije, ki so del skupine, bi morale podatke o bonitetnih ocenah ESMA sporočati ločeno ali pooblastiti eno od drugih agencij v skupini, da podatke predloži v njihovem imenu.
However, due to credit rating agencies’ highly integrated organisation at Union level and in order to facilitate the understanding of the statistics, credit rating agencies are encouraged to report on a global basis for the whole group.
Zaradi zelo integrirane funkcijske organizacije bonitetnih agencij na ravni Unije in lažjega razumevanja statističnih podatkov je treba bonitetne agencije spodbujati, da poročajo na svetovni ravni za celo skupino.
For the purposes of ESMA’s ongoing supervision and for the publication of the credit rating agencies’ historical performance reports, credit rating agencies may also, on a voluntary basis, report to ESMA credit ratings issued by third-country credit rating agencies belonging to the same group of credit rating agencies but not endorsed in accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
Bonitetne agencije lahko za potrebe stalnega nadzora in objavo poročil o preteklih rezultatih ESMA prostovoljno sporočajo bonitetne ocene, ki so jih izdale bonitetne agencije iz tretje države iz iste skupine bonitetnih agencij, a niso bile potrjene v skladu s členom 4(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009.
When submitting data, credit rating agencies should classify the credit ratings and rating outlooks issued in different categories:
Bonitetne agencije bi morale bonitetne ocene in pričakovane trende glede bonitetnih ocen pri predložitvi podatkov razvrstiti v različne kategorije:
by rating type and sub-classifications, such as sector, industry or asset class, or by type of issuer and issue.
glede na vrsto bonitetne ocene in podrazvrstitve, kot so sektor, gospodarska panoga ali kategorija sredstev, ali glede na izdajatelja in izdajo.
Those categories are based on ESMA’s previous rating data collection experience and the need for supervision of credit rating data.
Navedene kategorije temeljijo na preteklih izkušnjah ESMA glede zbiranja podatkov o bonitetnih ocenah in na potrebi po nadzoru podatkov o bonitetnih ocenah.
In order to provide for the reporting of credit ratings on new financial instruments that could arise as a result of financial innovation, a category should be included for reporting ‘other financial instruments’.
Da se zagotovi sporočanje bonitetnih ocen o novih finančnih instrumentih, ki bi lahko izhajali iz finančnih inovacij, bi bilo treba vključiti kategorijo za poročanje o „drugih finančnih instrumentih“.
Moreover, the corporate ratings and the structured finance ratings categories should also have an ‘other’ category to include all new types of corporate issues or structured finance instruments that cannot be classified into the existing categories.
Kategorije ocen gospodarskih družb in ocen strukturiranih finančnih instrumentov bi morale vsebovati tudi kategorijo „drugi“, da se vključijo vse nove vrste izdaj gospodarskih družb ali strukturiranih finančnih instrumentov, ki jih ni mogoče razvrstiti v obstoječe kategorije.
In order to ensure comparability and continuity of data reported under this Regulation, the first report should contain data on all ratings issued and not withdrawn by 21 June 2015.
Zaradi tehničnega napredka bo ESMA morda morala posodobiti nekatera tehnična navodila za poročanje glede prenosa ali oblike datotek, ki jih morajo predložiti bonitetne agencije, in navodila sporočiti s posebnimi sporočili ali smernicami.
In addition, the first report should contain data regarding credit ratings and rating outlooks issued by credit rating agencies from 21 June 2015 until 1 January 2016.
Ta uredba temelji na osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, ki jih je ESMA Komisiji predložila v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].
The first report should contain the same type of data as the rating data to be submitted on a daily basis thereafter.
ESMA je o osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, na katerih temelji ta uredba, opravila javno posvetovanje, analizirala morebitne s tem povezane stroške in koristi ter zahtevala mnenje interesne skupine za vrednostne papirje in trge, ustanovljene v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010.
In order to allow ESMA to receive and process the data automatically in its internal systems, the data to be reported should be compiled in a standard format.
Da se zagotovi skladnost s členom 2(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 462/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5], bi se morala ta uredba uporabljati od 21. junija 2015 –
Due to technical progress, a number of technical reporting instructions concerning the transmission or the format of the files to be submitted by credit rating agencies may have to be updated and communicated by ESMA through specific communications or guidelines.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
This Regulation is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by ESMA to the Commission in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Člen 1
ESMA conducted an open public consultation on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the opinion of the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Podatki, ki se sporočajo
In order to comply with Article 2(3) of Regulation (EU) No 462/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5], this Regulation should apply from 21 June 2015,
Bonitetne agencije sporočijo podatke o vseh svojih izdanih ali potrjenih bonitetnih ocenah ali pričakovanih trendih glede bonitetnih ocen v skladu s členi 8, 9 in 11.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Bonitetne agencije sporočijo vse bonitetne ocene in pričakovane trende glede bonitetnih ocen na ravni ocenjevanega subjekta in po potrebi za vse svoje izdane dolžniške instrumente.
Article 1
Bonitetne agencije zagotovijo točnost, popolnost in dostopnost podatkov, ki jih sporočijo ESMA, ter zagotovijo, da se poročila predložijo v skladu s členi 8, 9 in 11 ter pri tem uporabljajo ustrezne sisteme, razvite na podlagi tehničnih navodil, ki jih predloži ESMA.
Data to be reported
Bonitetne agencije ESMA nemudoma obvestijo o kakršnih koli izjemnih okoliščinah, zaradi katerih začasno ne morejo poročati v skladu s to uredbo oziroma lahko poročajo le z zamudo.
Credit rating agencies shall report data on all their issued or endorsed credit ratings or rating outlooks in accordance with Articles 8, 9, and 11.
Pri skupini bonitetnih agencij lahko članice vsake skupine eno od njih pooblastijo, da poročila, ki jih določa ta uredba, predloži v imenu skupine.
Credit rating agencies shall report all credit ratings and rating outlooks issued at rated entity level and on all their issued debt instruments, where applicable.
Vsaka bonitetna agencija, v katere imenu se navedeno poročilo predloži, se navede v podatkih, ki se predložijo ESMA.
Credit rating agencies shall ensure the accuracy, completeness and availability of the data reported to ESMA and shall ensure that reports are submitted in accordance with Articles 8, 9 and 11 using appropriate systems developed on the basis of technical instructions provided by ESMA.
Bonitetna agencija, ki poroča v imenu skupine, lahko za namene člena 11(2) in člena 21(4)(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009 vključi bonitetne ocene in pričakovane trende glede bonitetnih ocen, ki so jih izdale bonitetne agencije iz tretje države iz iste skupine, a niso bile potrjene.
Credit rating agencies shall notify ESMA immediately of any exceptional circumstances that may temporarily prevent or delay their reporting in accordance with this Regulation.
Če bonitetna agencija teh podatkov ne sporoči, to obrazloži v kvalitativnem poročilu o podatkih, v poljih 9 in 10 preglednice 1 dela 1 Priloge I k tej uredbi.
For groups of credit rating agencies, the members of each group may mandate one member to submit reports required under this Regulation on their behalf.
Bonitetne agencije razkrijejo status naročenosti vsake sporočene bonitetne ocene ali pričakovanega trenda glede bonitetnih ocen z navedbo, ali je nenaročena z udeležbo ali nenaročena brez udeležbe v skladu s členom 10(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009 ali naročena.
Each credit rating agency on whose behalf such a report is submitted shall be identified in the data submitted to ESMA.
Člen 2
For the purposes of Article 11(2) and Article 21(4)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009, a credit rating agency reporting on behalf of a group may include data on credit ratings and rating outlooks issued by third-country credit rating agencies belonging to the same group and not endorsed.
Poročanje o položaju neplačila in preklicih
Where a credit rating agency does not report such data it shall give an explanation in its qualitative data report, in Fields 9 and 10 of Table 1 of Part 1 of Annex I to this Regulation.
Bonitetna agencija poroča o neplačilu v zvezi z oceno v poljih 6 in 13 preglednice 2 dela 2 Priloge I, če pride do katerega od naslednjih dogodkov:
Credit rating agencies shall disclose the solicitation status of each reported credit rating or rating outlook by specifying whether it is unsolicited with participation or unsolicited without participation in accordance with Article 10(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 or solicited.
bonitetna ocena kaže, da je bilo v skladu z opredelitvijo „neplačila“ bonitetne agencije ugotovljeno neplačilo;
Article 2
bonitetna ocena je bila preklicana zaradi nesolventnosti ocenjenega subjekta ali prestrukturiranja dolga ali
Reporting of default status and withdrawals
v vseh drugih primerih, ko bonitetna agencija meni, da je ocenjeni subjekt ali instrument v neplačilu, bistveno oslabljen ali je v podobnem položaju.
A credit rating agency shall report a default in respect of a rating in Fields 6 and 13 of Table 2 of Part 2 of Annex I where one of the following events has occurred:
Če je sporočena bonitetna ocena preklicana, se razlog za preklic navede v polju 11 preglednice 2 dela 2 Priloge I.
the rating indicates that a default has occurred according to the credit rating agency’s definition of default;
Člen 3
the rating has been withdrawn due to insolvency of the rated entity or due to debt restructuring;
Vrste bonitetnih ocen
any other instance in which the credit rating agency considers a rated entity or rated instrument as defaulted, materially impaired or equivalent.
Bonitetne agencije bonitetne ocene ali pričakovane trende glede bonitetne ocene pri sporočanju razvrstijo v eno od naslednjih vrst bonitetnih ocen:
Where a reported rating is withdrawn, the reason for that shall be reported in Field 11 of Table 2 of Part 2 of Annex I.
bonitetne ocene gospodarskih družb;
Article 3
bonitetne ocene strukturiranih finančnih instrumentov;
Rating types
bonitetne ocene držav in javnih financ;
Credit rating agencies shall, when reporting credit ratings or rating outlooks, classify them as one of the following types of ratings:
drugi finančni instrumenti.
corporate ratings;
Člen 4
structured finance ratings;
Bonitetne ocene gospodarskih družb
sovereign and public finance ratings;
Bonitetne agencije pri sporočanju bonitetnih ocen gospodarskih družb te ocene razvrstijo v eno od naslednjih gospodarskih panog:
other financial instruments.
finančne institucije, vključno z bankami, borznimi posredniki in borznimi trgovci;
Article 4
zavarovalnice;
Corporate ratings
drugi gospodarski subjekti ali izdajatelji, ki niso vključeni v točkah (a) in (b).
Credit rating agencies shall, when reporting corporate ratings, classify them within one of the following industry segments:
Bonitetne agencije izdaje gospodarskih družb razvrstijo v eno od naslednjih vrst izdaj:
financial institutions, including banks, brokers and dealers;
obveznice;
insurance;
krite obveznice iz člena 52(4) Direktive 2009/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], ki izpolnjujejo merila za upravičenost iz odstavkov 1 do 3, 6 in 7 člena 129 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7];
all other corporate entities or issuers which are not included in points (a) and (b).
druge vrste kritih obveznic, pri katerih je bonitetna agencija za izdajo bonitetne ocene uporabila posebne metodologije, metode ali ključne ocenjevalne predpostavke za izdajo bonitetne ocene, in niso vključene v točko (b);
Credit rating agencies shall classify corporate issues as one of the following issue types:
druge vrste izdaj gospodarskih družb, ki niso vključene v točke (a), (b) in (c).
bonds;
Oznaka države ocenjevanega subjekta ali njegovih izdaj v polju 10 preglednice 1 dela 2 Priloge I je oznaka države, v kateri je sedež subjekta.
covered bonds as referred to in Article 52(4) of Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] that meet the eligibility requirements set out in paragraphs 1 to 3, 6 and 7 of Article 129 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 [7];
Člen 5
other types of covered bonds, for which the credit rating agency has used specific covered bond methodologies, models or key rating assumptions for issuing the credit rating and which are not included in point (b);
Ocene strukturiranih finančnih instrumentov
other types of corporate issues which are not included in points (a), (b) and (c).
Ocene strukturiranih finančnih instrumentov so povezane s finančnim instrumentom ali drugimi sredstvi, ki so rezultat posla ali sheme listinjenja iz člena 4(1)(61) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
The country code of a rated entity or its issues in Field 10 of Table 1 of Part 2 of Annex I shall be that of the country of domicile of the entity.
Bonitetne agencije pri sporočanju bonitetnih ocen strukturiranih finančnih instrumentov te ocene razvrstijo v eno od naslednjih skupin naložb:
Article 5
vrednostni papirji na podlagi premoženja, vključno s krediti za nakup avtomobila, krediti za nakup ladje, krediti za nakup letala, študentskimi krediti, potrošniškimi krediti, krediti za mala in srednja podjetja, krediti za zdravljenje, krediti za nakup montažne hiše na kolesih, krediti za filmsko produkcijo, krediti za komunalno ureditev, najemom opreme, faktoringom iz naslova kreditnih kartic, davčnimi izvršbami, nedonosnimi krediti, krediti za nakup avtodoma, krediti posameznikom, krediti podjetjem in terjatvami do kupcev;
Structured finance ratings
finančni instrument, zavarovan s stanovanjsko hipoteko, vključno s prvorazrednimi in neprvorazrednimi finančnimi instrumenti, zavarovanimi s stanovanjsko hipoteko, ter stanovanjski krediti, zavarovani z lastniškim deležem na nepremičnini;
Structured finance ratings shall relate to a financial instrument or other assets resulting from a securitisation transaction or scheme referred to in Article 4(1)(61) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
finančni instrument, zavarovan s hipoteko na poslovne nepremičnine, vključno s krediti za prodajne ali poslovne prostore, krediti za bolnišnice, krediti za domove za nego, krediti za skladiščne objekte, krediti za hotele, oskrbne domove, krediti za gospodarsko panogo in krediti za večstanovanjske objekte;
Credit rating agencies shall, when reporting structured finance ratings, classify them within one of the following asset classes:
finančni instrumenti, zavarovani z dolžniškimi instrumenti, vključno s finančnimi instrumenti, zavarovanimi s kreditom, s kreditom kritimi finančnimi instrumenti, z dolžniškimi instrumenti zavarovanimi sintetičnimi finančnimi instrumenti, z dolžniškimi instrumenti zavarovanimi enotranšnimi finančnimi instrumenti, z investicijskimi skladi zavarovanimi finančnimi instrumenti, z obveznicami zavarovanimi finančnimi instrumenti, finančnimi instrumenti, zavarovanimi z dolžniškimi instrumenti s premoženjem zavarovanih vrednostnih papirjev in finančnimi instrumenti, zavarovanimi z dolžniškimi instrumenti finančnih instrumentov, zavarovanih z dolžniškimi instrumenti;
asset-backed securities, including auto loans, boat loans, airplane loans, student loans, consumer loans, small and medium-sized enterprise loans, healthcare loans, manufactured housing loans, film loans, utility loans, equipment leases, credit card receivables, tax liens, non-performing loans, recreational vehicle loans, leases to individuals, leases to businesses, and trade receivables;
komercialni zapisi, zavarovani z zastavo premoženja;
residential mortgage-backed securities, including prime and non-prime residential mortgage-backed securities, and home equity loans;
drugi strukturirani finančni instrumenti, ki ne spadajo v točke (a) do (e), vključno s strukturiranimi kritimi obveznicami, strukturiranimi finančnimi instrumenti, vrednostnimi papirji, povezanimi z zavarovalnim tveganjem, in ponudniki izvedenih finančnih instrumentov.
commercial mortgage-backed securities, including retail or office property loans, hospital loans, care residences loans, storage facilities loans, hotel loans, nursing facilities loans, industrial loans, and multifamily properties loans;
Bonitetna agencija po potrebi v polju 34 preglednice 1 dela 2 Priloge I navede tudi, v kateri določeni podrazred finančnih instrumentov spada posamezni ocenjevani instrument.
collateralised debt obligations, including collateralised loan obligations, credit-backed obligations, collateralised synthetic obligations, single-tranche collateralised debt obligations, credit fund obligations, collateralised debt obligations of asset-backed securities, and collateralised debt obligations of collateralised debt obligations;
Oznaka države strukturiranega finančnega instrumenta se sporoči v polju 10 preglednice 1 dela 2 Priloge I in je oznaka države, v kateri je bila izdana večina sredstev.
asset-backed commercial papers;
Če države izdaje večine sredstev ni mogoče ugotoviti, se ocenjeni instrument opredeli kot „mednarodni“.
other structured finance instruments which are not included in points (a) to (e), including structured covered bonds, structured investment vehicles, insurance-linked securities and derivative product companies.
Člen 6
Where applicable, a credit rating agency shall also indicate which specific sub-asset class each rated instrument belongs to in Field 34 of Table 1 of Part 2 of Annex I.
Bonitetne ocene držav in javnih financ
The country code of structured finance instruments shall be reported in Field 10 of Table 1 of Part 2 of Annex I and shall be that of the country of domicile of the majority of the underlying assets.
Bonitetne agencije pri sporočanju podatkov v zvezi z bonitetnimi ocenami državnih in javnih organov ter naddržavnih organizacij in njihovega izdanega dolga te ocene razvrstijo v enega od naslednjih sektorjev:
Where it is not possible to identify the country of domicile of the majority of the underlying assets, the rated instrument shall be classified as ‘international’.
država, če je ocenjevani subjekt država ali je izdajatelj ocenjevanega dolga ali finančne obveznosti, dolžniškega vrednostnega papirja ali drugega finančnega instrumenta država ali subjekt države s posebnim namenom iz točke (v)(i) in (ii) člena 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009 ter če se bonitetna ocena nanaša na državo;
Article 6
regionalni ali lokalni organ, če je ocenjevani subjekt regionalni ali lokalni organ ali je izdajatelj ocenjevanega dolga ali finančne obveznosti, dolžniškega vrednostnega papirja ali drugega finančnega instrumenta regionalni ali lokalni organ ali subjekt regionalnega ali lokalnega organa s posebnim namenom iz točke (v)(i) in (ii) člena 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009 ter če se bonitetna ocena nanaša na regionalni ali lokalni organ;
Sovereign and public finance ratings
mednarodna finančna institucija iz točke (v)(iii) člena 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009;
Credit rating agencies shall, when reporting data concerning ratings of sovereign and public entities and of supranational organisations and their issued debt, classify them within one of the following sectors:
nadnacionalna organizacija, kot so institucije, ki niso vključene v točko (c), ki jih ustanovi, nadzira in ima v lasti več kot ena državna delničarka, vključno z organizacijami iz oddelka U Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1893/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8];
State, where the rated entity is a State or the issuer of the rated debt or financial obligation, debt security or other financial instrument is a State, or a special purpose vehicle of a State, as referred to in point (v)(i) and (ii) of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 and where the rating refers to a State;
javni subjekti, vključno s tistimi iz oddelkov O, P in Q Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1893/2006.