natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 29 April 2016, the Hellenic Republic transmitted to the Commission the Report on the implementation of the Action Plan in accordance with Article 16(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013.
V skladu s členom 16(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1053/2013 pa je Komisiji 29. aprila 2016 predložila poročilo o izvajanju akcijskega načrta.
Between 10 and 16 April 2016, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 and the annual evaluation programme for 2016, an announced on-site visit was carried out in the Hellenic Republic [5].
Med 10. in 16. aprilom 2016 je bil v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1053/2013 in letnim ocenjevalnim programom za leto 2016 v Helenski republiki opravljen obisk na kraju samem [5].
The record number of migrants arriving in the European Union since 2015 and the deficiencies at parts of the Union's external border identified during the November 2015 evaluation have resulted in important secondary movements, causing a serious threat to public policy or internal security in several Member States.
Rekordno število migrantov, ki prihajajo v Evropsko unijo od leta 2015, ter pomanjkljivosti na delih zunanje meje Unije, ugotovljene med ocenjevanjem novembra 2015, so privedli do pomembnih sekundarnih gibanj, ki pomenijo resno grožnjo javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti v več državah članicah.
Currently five Schengen States (Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway) carry out border controls at internal borders in response to a serious threat to public policy or internal security that was caused by secondary movements of irregular migrants triggered by serious deficiencies in external border controls.
V odziv na resno grožnjo javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, ki so jo povzročila sekundarna gibanja migrantov brez urejenega statusa, sprožena zaradi resnih pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru zunanjih meja, trenutno pet schengenskih držav (Avstrija, Nemčija, Danska, Švedska in Norveška) izvaja nadzor na notranjih mejah.
These reintroductions of controls at internal borders provide an adequate response to the identified threat to the internal security and public policy in compliance with the Schengen Borders Code, and these measures are necessary and are considered proportionate.
Te ponovne uvedbe nadzora na notranjih mejah zagotavljajo ustrezen odziv na ugotovljeno grožnjo notranji varnosti in javnemu redu v skladu z Zakonikom o schengenskih mejah; ti ukrepi so nujni in se štejejo za sorazmerne.
On 23 October 2015, the Commission issued an opinion on the necessity and proportionality of the controls at internal borders reintroduced by Germany and Austria [6] concluding that the reintroduction of controls, as well as the prolongations thereof, was in compliance with the Schengen Borders Code.(12) In its communication ‘Back to Schengen — A Roadmap’ [7], the Commission referred to the need, if the migratory pressures and the serious deficiencies in external border control were to persist beyond 12 May 2016, to present a proposal under Article 29(2) of the Schengen Borders Code to the Council recommending a coherent Union approach to internal border controls until the structural deficiencies in external border control are mitigated or remedied.
Komisija je 23. oktobra 2015 izdala mnenje o nujnosti in sorazmernosti nadzora na notranjih mejah, ki sta ga ponovno uvedli Nemčija in Avstrija [6], v katerem je prišla do zaključka, da so bili tako ponovna uvedba nadzora kot tudi podaljšanja teh kontrol v skladu z Zakonikom o schengenskih mejah.(12) V svojem sporočilu „Vrnitev k schengenski ureditvi – časovni načrt“ [7] je Komisija navedla, da bo morala, če se bodo migracijski pritisk in resne pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru zunanjih meja nadaljevali po 12. maju 2016, Svetu predložiti predlog na podlagi člena 29(2) Zakonika o schengenskih mejah in predlagati usklajen pristop Unije k nadzoru na notranjih mejah, dokler se strukturne pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru zunanjih meja ne ublažijo ali odpravijo.
The Communication sets out the steps that need to be taken in order to return to a normally functioning Schengen area at the latest by the end of 2016.
Sporočilo določa ukrepe, ki jih je treba sprejeti za ponovno vzpostavitev normalnega delovanja schengenskega območja najpozneje do konca leta 2016.
Moreover, the initial implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement of 18 March 2016 [8], together with the ongoing operations by Frontex and NATO, have led to a sharp decrease in the number of irregular migrants and asylum seekers crossing from Turkey into the Hellenic Republic.
Ali se bo trend znatnega zmanjšanja migracijskih tokov nadaljeval, se mora še potrditi.
This substantial reduction in the flow of irregular migrants and asylum seekers to the Hellenic Republic, together with the support provided by EU Agencies and other Member States in the hotspots, has enabled the Hellenic Republic to significantly improve the registration of newly arriving irregular migrants and asylum seekers.
Kljub znatnemu napredku pa v trimesečnem roku, določenem v členu 21(3) Uredbe (EU) 2016/399, ni bilo mogoče ustrezno in celovito odpraviti vseh ugotovljenih resnih pomanjkljivosti.
The sustainability of the substantial reduction of the migratory flow needs to be confirmed.
Nekatere resne pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru zunanjih meja še vedno obstajajo in ogrožajo splošno delovanje območja brez nadzora na notranjih mejah.
Despite this significant progress, not all of the serious deficiencies identified could be adequately and comprehensively addressed within the three months' time limit laid down in Article 21(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399.
Zlasti še niso bile odpravljene strukturne pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru zunanjih meja, povezane s splošnim sistemom upravljanja meja, varovanjem meja in spremljanjem razmer.
Some of the serious deficiencies in external border control persist, and they put at risk the overall functioning of the area without internal border control.
Poleg tega kar nekaj oseb brez urejenega statusa, ki so vstopile na ozemlje Helenske republike, ni bilo registriranih in obstaja možnost nedovoljenega gibanja v druge države članice.
In particular, structural deficiencies in external border control related to the overall border management system, border surveillance and situational awareness, have not been remedied yet.
To tveganje sekundarnih gibanj je zlasti veliko v primeru migrantov brez urejenega statusa, ki niso nastanjeni v ustreznih sprejemnih centrih.
Moreover, a number of persons who stay irregularly on the territory of the Hellenic Republic have not been registered and may seek to move irregularly to other Member States.
Čeprav je Svet priporočil, da bi morala Helenska republika sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se na vsej zunanji meji Helenske republike nadzor zunanje meje izvaja v skladu s schengenskim pravnim redom, varovanje meje z nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo trenutno ni v celoti skladno z Zakonikom o schengenskih mejah.
This risk of secondary movements is particularly high for those irregular migrants who are not accommodated in adequate reception facilities.
To še povečuje tveganje sekundarnih gibanj migrantov v druge države članice.
Finally, while the Council recommended that the Hellenic Republic should take appropriate measures to ensure that at all its external borders, external border control is carried out and brought in line with the Schengen acquis, border surveillance at the border with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is currently not fully compliant with the Schengen Borders Code.
Zato nekatere resne pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru zunanjih meja, ki so sprožile sekundarna gibanja migrantov brez urejenega statusa in več držav članic spodbudile k začasni ponovni uvedbi nadzora na notranjih mejah iz razlogov javnega reda ali notranje varnosti, še vedno obstajajo in ogrožajo splošno delovanje območja brez nadzora na notranjih mejah.
This adds to the risk of secondary movements of migrants to other Member States.
Zaradi tega trajnega tveganja sekundarnih gibanj je potreben dosleden, usklajen in trajnosten pristop k začasnemu nadzoru meja.
Consequently, some of the serious deficiencies in external border controls that triggered secondary movements of irregular migrants and prompted several Member States to temporarily reintroduce internal border controls for reasons related to public policy or internal security persist, putting at risk the overall functioning of the area without internal border control.
Ker z nobenim drugim ukrepom ni bilo mogoče učinkovito ublažiti ugotovljenih resnih groženj, so pogoji za uporabo člena 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah v skrajnem primeru izpolnjeni.
This persistent risk of secondary movements requires a coherent, coordinated and sustainable approach of temporary internal border control.
Zato bi bilo treba priporočilo za izvajanje nadzora na notranjih mejah v skladu s členom 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij nasloviti na tiste države članice, ki trenutno izvajajo nadzor na notranjih mejah v odziv na resno grožnjo javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, ki so jo povzročila sekundarna gibanja migrantov brez urejenega statusa, in sicer na Nemčijo, Dansko, Avstrijo in Švedsko ter pridruženo državo Norveško.
As all other measures have been ineffective in mitigating the serious threat identified, it follows that the conditions for applying Article 29 of the Schengen Borders Code as a last resort are fulfilled.
Tem državam članicam bi bilo treba dovoliti izvajanje takšnega nadzora, saj je ta nadzor ustrezen odziv na resno grožnjo javnemu redu in notranji varnosti, povezano s sekundarnimi gibanji migrantov brez urejenega statusa.
Therefore, a recommendation to carry out internal border control under Article 29 of the Schengen Borders Code should be addressed, based on the information available, to those Member States that are currently carrying out internal border control in response to a serious threat to public policy or internal security that was caused by secondary movements of irregular migrants, namely Germany, Denmark, Austria and Sweden and the associated country Norway.
Notranje meje, na katerih se trenutno izvajajo kontrole, ustrezajo ugotovljenim migracijskim potem in grožnjam, pri čemer je poudarek na določenih odsekih kopenske meje ali določenih pristaniščih.
These Member States should be permitted to carry out such controls as these controls adequately address the serious threat to public policy and internal security related to the secondary movements of irregular migrants.
Države članice, ki se bodo odločile za izvajanje nadzora na notranjih mejah na podlagi tega priporočila, bi morale o tem uradno obvestiti druge države članice, Evropski parlament in Komisijo.
The internal borders currently affected by the checks correspond to the identified migratory routes and threats, with focus on specific land border sections or specific ports.
Nadzor na podlagi člena 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah bi bilo treba izvajati le, kolikor je to potrebno, intenzivnost nadzora pa omejiti na nujno potreben minimum, da bi bilo prehajanje zadevnih notranjih meja za širšo javnost čim manj ovirano.
The Member States that decide to carry out internal border control following the present Recommendation should notify the other Member States, the European Parliament and the Commission accordingly.
V ta namen bi bilo treba izvajati le ciljno usmerjen nadzor.
The controls under Article 29 of the Schengen Borders Code should be carried out only to the necessary extent, limited in their intensity of the controls to the absolute minimum necessary and impeding as less as possible the crossing of the respective internal borders for the general public.
Nujnost tega nadzora in zadevne odseke meje bi bilo treba redno ocenjevati v sodelovanju z zadevnimi državami članicami.
For this purpose, only targeted controls should be carried out.
Nadzor meje bi se moral izvajati le tako dolgo, kolikor je to potrebno za obravnavanje grožnje javnemu redu in notranji varnosti.
The necessity of these controls, together with the border sections affected, should be re-evaluated regularly in cooperation with the Member States concerned.
Prav tako bi bilo treba nemudoma vzpostaviti in v celoti izvajati več zakonodajnih pobud in ukrepov Unije za okrepitev upravljanja zunanjih meja (evropska mejna in obalna straža, vrnitev k celovitemu izvajanju določb azilne zakonodaje EU s strani Helenske republike, pospešitev izvajanja programa za nujno premestitev, izjava EU in Turčije) ter tako nadalje prispevati k znatnemu zmanjšanju sekundarnih gibanj migrantov brez urejenega statusa.
Border control should take place only as long as required to address the threat to public policy and internal security.
Svet je seznanjen s tem, da bo Komisija spremljala izvajanje tega priporočila in, če bo potrebno in sorazmerno, predlagala prilagoditve, ki bodo ustrezale spremembam razmer, ki so privedle do sprejetja tega priporočila v skladu z določbami člena 29 Zakonika o schengenskih mejah.
Several legislative initiatives and actions undertaken by the Union in order to reinforce its external border management (European Coast and Border Guard, return to a full application of EU asylum law provisions by the Hellenic Republic, stepping up of the implementation of the emergency relocation scheme, the EU-Turkey Statement) should also be in place and fully operational without delay and thus further contribute to a substantial reduction in the secondary movements of irregular migrants.
Komisija je tudi napovedala, da bo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu po štirih mesecih od datuma sprejetja tega priporočila ali še prej, če bo mogoče, poročala o njegovi uporabi ter bo lahko takrat predlagala spremembe na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj in takratnih okoliščin –
The Council takes note that the Commission will monitor the application of this recommendation and, where necessary and proportionate, propose adaptations to reflect changes in the specific circumstances that have led to the adoption of this recommendation, in accordance with the provisions of Article 29 of the Schengen Borders Code.
PRIPOROČA:
The Commission has also announced that it will report to the European Parliament and the Council after four months as from the date of the adoption of this recommendation on its application, or earlier if possible, and on that occasion may propose amendments to this recommendation in light of the experience acquired and the circumstances,
naj Avstrija, Nemčija, Danska, Švedska in Norveška ohranijo sorazmerni začasni nadzor meje za obdobje največ šest mesecev z začetkom na dan sprejetja tega izvedbenega sklepa na naslednjih notranjih mejah:
HEREBY RECOMMENDS:
Avstrija na avstrijsko-madžarski kopenski meji in avstrijsko-slovenski kopenski meji,
Austria, Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway to maintain proportionate temporary border controls for a maximum period of six months, starting from the day of the adoption of this Implementing Decision, at the following internal borders:
Nemčija na nemško-avstrijski kopenski meji,
Austria at the Austrian-Hungarian land border and Austrian-Slovenian land border,
Danska v danskih pristaniščih s trajektnimi povezavami z Nemčijo in na dansko-nemški kopenski meji,
Germany at the German-Austrian land border,
Švedska v švedskih pristaniščih v južni in zahodni policijski regiji ter na mostu Öresund,
Denmark in the Danish ports with ferry connections to Germany and at the Danish-German land border,
Norveška v norveških pristaniščih s trajektnimi povezavami z Dansko, Nemčijo in Švedsko.
Sweden in the Swedish harbours in the Police Region South and West and at the Öresund bridge,
Zadevne države članice bi morale pred uvedbo takšnega nadzora izmenjati mnenja z ustrezno sosednjo državo članico ali državami članicami, da bi v skladu z Zakonikom o schengenskih mejah zagotovile, da se bo nadzor na notranjih mejah izvajal le na tistih delih notranje meje, kjer je takšen ukrep nujen in sorazmeren.
Norway in the Norwegian ports with ferry connections to Denmark, Germany and Sweden.
Zadevne države članice bi morale o tem uradno obvestiti druge države članice, Evropski parlament in Komisijo.
Before introducing such controls, the Member State concerned should exchange views with the relevant neighbouring Member State(s) with a view to ensuring that internal border controls are only carried out at those parts of the internal border where it is considered necessary and proportionate, in accordance with the Schengen Borders Code.
Mejne kontrole meje bi morale biti ciljno usmerjene ter po obsegu, pogostosti, lokaciji in času omejene na to, kar je nujno potrebno za odziv na resno grožnjo ter za zaščito javnega reda in notranje varnosti.
The Member States concerned should notify the other Member States, the European Parliament and the Commission accordingly.
Država članica, ki izvaja nadzor na notranjih mejah na podlagi tega izvedbenega sklepa, bi morala redno preverjati nujnost, pogostost, lokacijo in čas nadzora, nadzor prilagajati stopnji obravnavane grožnje, ga prenehati izvajati, kadar koli je to primerno, in vsaka dva meseca poročati Komisiji.
Border controls should be targeted and limited in scope, frequency, location and time, to what is strictly necessary to respond to the serious threat and to safeguard public policy and internal security.
V Bruslju, 12. maja 2016
The Member State that carries out internal border control pursuant to the present Implementing Decision should regularly review the necessity, frequency, location and time of controls, adjust the controls to the level of the threat addressed, phasing them out wherever appropriate, and report to the Commission every two months.
Za Svet
Done at Brussels, 12 May 2016.
Predsednica
For the Council
UL L 77, 23.3.2016, str. 1.
The President
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1053/2013 z dne 7. oktobra 2013 o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega in spremljevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda in razveljavitvi Sklepa Izvršnega odbora z dne 16. septembra 1998 o ustanovitvi stalnega odbora o ocenjevanju in izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma (UL L 295, 6.11.2013, str. 27).
OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p. 1.
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije C(2014) 8377 z dne 14. novembra 2014 o vzpostavitvi letnega ocenjevalnega programa za nenapovedane obiske na kraju samem za leto 2015 v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1053/2013 z dne 7. oktobra 2013 o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega in spremljevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda.
Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 of 7 October 2013 establishing an evaluation and monitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis and repealing the Decision of the Executive Committee of 16 September 1998 setting up a Standing Committee on the evaluation and implementation of Schengen (OJ L 295, 6.11.2013, p. 27).
C(2016) 450 z dne 2. februarja 2016.
Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 8377 of 14 November 2014 establishing the annual evaluation programme of unannounced on-site visits for 2015 in accordance with Article 6 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 of 7 October 2013 establishing an evaluation and monitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis.
C(2015) 8537 z dne 9. decembra 2015.
C(2016) 450 of 2 February 2016.
C(2015) 7100 z dne 23. oktobra 2015.
C(2015) 8537 of 9 December 2015.
SN 38/16 z dne 18. marca 2016.
C(2015) 7100 of 23 October 2015.
Helenska republika je dosegla znaten napredek pri odpravljanju številnih pomanjkljivosti pri upravljanju zunanjih meja, ugotovljenih med ocenjevanjem novembra 2015.
SN 38/16 of 18.3.2016.
Poleg tega so začetno izvajanje izjave EU in Turčije z dne 18. marca 2016 [8] ter tekoče operacije Frontexa in Nata privedli do močnega upada števila migrantov brez urejenega statusa in prosilcev za azil, ki pridejo v Helensko republiko iz Turčije.
The Hellenic Republic has made significant progress in addressing many of the deficiencies in its external border management identified during the November 2015 evaluation.
COM(2016) 120 final.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/903
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/903
of 8 June 2016
z dne 8. junija 2016
pursuant to Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a horse rug impregnated with permethrin used for the purpose of controlling nuisance insects in the environment of the horse
o odeji za konje, impregnirani s permetrinom, za zatiranje nadležnih žuželk v okolju konja v skladu s členom 3(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
On 21 September 2015, Ireland requested the Commission to decide, pursuant to Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, whether a horse rug placed on the market to be used for the protection of horses and their environment from insects (horse and stable flies) is a biocidal product or a treated article or neither.
Irska je 21. septembra 2015 zaprosila Komisijo, da v skladu s členom 3(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 odloči, ali je odeja za konje, dana na trg za zaščito konjev in njihovega okolja pred žuželkami (konjske muhe in hlevske muhe), biocidni proizvod ali tretirani izdelek ali nič od navedenega.
According to the information provided by Ireland, the horse rug consists of two separate layers of fabric, of which the outer layer is impregnated with permethrin and separated from the horses' skin by a non-impregnated inner layer.
Po informacijah, ki jih je predložila Irska, je odeja za konje sestavljena iz dveh ločenih plasti tkanine, od katerih je zunanja plast impregnirana s permetrinom, od kože konja pa je ločena z neimpregnirano notranjo plastjo.
The treatment with permethrin is claimed to further enhance the physical protection function of the rug against nuisance insects in the environment of the horse, as insects will be killed when landing on the outer layer of the rug.
Obdelava s permetrinom naj bi dodatno izboljšala funkcijo odeje, da fizično zaščiti pred nadležnimi žuželkami v okolju konja, saj bodo žuželke ubite ob stiku z zunanjo plastjo odeje.
The horse rug is intended to control insects, which meet the definition of harmful organism as provided under Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 since they may have a detrimental effect on animals or humans.
Odeja za konje je namenjena zatiranju žuželk, ki ustrezajo opredelitvi škodljivih organizmov iz člena 3(1)(g) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012, saj lahko imajo škodljiv vpliv na ljudi ali živali.
In accordance with Article 3(1)(a) of that Regulation, destroying, deterring, rendering harmless, preventing the action of, or otherwise exerting a controlling effect on any harmful organism is a biocidal function.
V skladu s členom 3(1)(a) navedene uredbe je uničevanje, odvračanje ali nevtralizacija škodljivih organizmov, preprečevanje njihovega delovanja ali zatiranje teh organizmov biocidna funkcija.
The horse rug meets the definition of an article as provided under Article 3(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, since it has a special shape, surface or design which determines its function to a greater degree than does its chemical composition.
Odeja za konje ustreza opredelitvi izdelka iz člena 3(2)(c) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012, saj ima posebno obliko, površino ali zasnovo, ki bolj določa njeno funkcijo kot njena kemična sestava.
The rug meets the definition of a treated article as provided under Article 3(1)(l) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, as permethrin is intentionally incorporated into it with the aim to control insects in the environment of the horse.
Odeja ustreza opredelitvi tretiranega izdelka iz člena 3(1)(l) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012, saj je namerno impregnirana s permetrinom za zatiranje žuželk v okolju konja.
It is therefore essential to establish whether or not the horse rug has a primary biocidal function according to agreed Union guidance [2], in order to define whether it is a treated article or a biocidal product.
Zato je nujno določiti, ali ima odeja za konje primarno biocidno funkcijo v skladu z dogovorjenim navodilom Unije [2], da se lahko opredeli, ali je tretirani izdelek ali biocidni proizvod.