natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The most significant difference relates to the fact that, if PSV were to default after obtaining a loan from the municipality, the municipality would at best receive back the notional amount of the loan.
Tako bi bilo mogoče pričakovati, da bi imela transakcija prodaje in povratnega zakupa nižji pričakovani donos kot posojilo.
It would not be able to benefit from any increase in the value of the land beyond the notional amount of the loan.
Stopnja donosa posojila z visokokakovostnim zavarovanjem, danega podjetju z bonitetno oceno, ki je podobna oceni nogometnega kluba PSV, bi torej pomenila zgornjo mejo referenčne vrednosti.
In the sale-and-lease-back agreement, the municipality becomes owner of the land at the start of the lease contract and will have full ownership rights in case of default.
Zaradi neobstoja zanesljivih tržnih meril [10] je tržno referenčno obrestno mero za alternativo posojilu PSV treba vzpostaviti na podlagi sporočila Komisije o spremembi metode določanja referenčnih obrestnih mer in diskontnih stopenj [11].
The municipality put emphasis on that aspect when deciding on the measure, given in particular that the guaranteed full disposal over the land after a potential default by PSV deviates in the municipality's favour from the general provisions of Dutch law (recital 59).
Za pridobitev previdne ocene se ta izračun opravi ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je PSV v letu 2011 izkazoval slabo kreditno kvaliteto, in ob predpostavki visokega zavarovanja posojila (tj. z zemljiščem).
Any increase in the value of the land (after fixing the loan terms) will hence only benefit the municipality.
Dobljena referenčna obrestna mera bi znašala 6,05 %.
Thus, one would expect a sale-and-lease-back transaction to have a priori a lower expected return than a loan.
Vlagatelj, ki da posojilo, zato pričakuje za 1,01 % višji donos kot občina v transakciji prodaje in povratnega zakupa.
The rate of return of a loan with high-quality collateral given to a company with a rating similar to PSV football club would thus constitute an upper bound for a benchmark.
Vendar pa občina še vedno deluje kot vlagatelj v tržnem gospodarstvu, če je vlagatelj, ki da posojilo, pripravljen odpustili donos v višini 1,01 % v zameno za morebitno povečanje vrednosti zemljišča (glej uvodno izjavo 61).
In the absence of reliable market proxies [10], the market reference rate for the alternative scenario of a loan to PSV would have to be established on the basis of the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates [11].
Na podlagi značilnosti transakcije je tak potencial povečanja vrednosti vreden vsaj 1,01 %, zato se donos, ki ga pričakuje občina pri prodaji in povratnem zakupu, zdi v skladu s tržnimi referenčnimi merili.
That calculation would be done, in order to be conservative, considering that PSV exhibited a poor credit quality in 2011 and assuming high collateralisation for the loan (i.e. the land).
Zato se zdi, da konstrukt prodaje in povratnega zakupa ne povzroči neupravičene prednosti za PSV in občini daje donos, ki je v skladu z načelom vlagateljev v tržnem gospodarstvu.
The resulting reference rate would amount to 6,05 %.
Nazadnje je treba opozoriti, da je po mnenju Nizozemske zakupnina primerljiva z najemnino, ki jo drugod po državi plačujejo profesionalni nogometni klubi za najem stadiona.
A loan investor thus expects a 1,01 % higher return than the municipality in the sale-and-lease-back transaction.
Čeprav je takšna primerjava še vedno težavna zaradi različnih lokacij, je treba poudariti, da navedeni klubi ne plačujejo le letne najemnine za zemljišče pod stadionom, temveč za celotno poslopje stadiona.
However, the municipality still acts as a market economy investor if the loan investor is willing to forgive a return of 1,01 % in exchange for a possible increase in land value (see recital 61).
Za primerjavo, PSV je lastnik stadiona, nosi stroške njegovega obratovanja in vzdrževanja ter poleg tega plačuje zakupnino zemljišče pod stadionom.
Based on the characteristics of the transaction, such an upside potential is worth at least 1,01 % and the return expected by the municipality in the sale and leaseback transaction therefore appears in line with market benchmarks.
SKLEPNA UGOTOVITEV
Therefore, it appears that the sale-and-lease-back construction does not result in an undue advantage for PSV and provides the municipality with a return that falls within the MEIP.
Zato Komisija ugotavlja, da so bili dvomi, izraženi v odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka, v zadostni meri odpravljeni.
Last, it should be noted that the annual lease fee, according to the Netherlands, is comparable with the rent paid elsewhere in the country by professional football clubs for stadium rent.
Občina je, ko je kupila zemljišče stadiona in ga dala v zakup PSV, ravnala tako, kot bi ravnal hipotetični zasebni vlagatelj v podobnem položaju.
While any such comparison remains difficult because of different locations, it should be emphasised that these other clubs pay the annual rent not only for the land under the stadium but for the entire stadium complex.
Zato transakcija ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe –
In comparison, PSV owns the stadium, carries the costs of its operation and maintenance and pays in addition a lease fee for the land under it.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
The Commission therefore concludes that the doubts expressed in the opening decision have been sufficiently dispelled.
Ukrep, ki ga je Nizozemska izvedla v korist nogometnega kluba PSV v Eindhovnu, ne pomeni pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The municipality, when it bought the stadium land and leased it back to PSV, behaved in the way a hypothetical private investor in a comparable position could have done.
Člen 2
Therefore, the transaction does not entail State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty,
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Kraljevino Nizozemsko.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
V Bruslju, 4. julija 2016
The measure which the Netherlands has implemented in favour of the football club PSV in Eindhoven does not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Članica Komisije
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Glej opombo 1.
Done at Brussels, 4 July 2016.
Zadeva T-370/13 Gemeente Eindhoven proti Komisiji.
For the Commission
UL C 209, 10.7.1997, str. 3.
Member of the Commission
Zadeva Olympique Lyonnais, C-325/08, ECLI:EU:C:2010:143, točki 27 in 28; zadeva Meca-Medina in Majcen proti Komisiji, C-519/04 P, ECLI:EU:C:2006:492, točka 22, in zadeva Bosman, C-415/93, ECLI:EU:C:1995:463, točka 73.
Commission Decision in Case SA.33584 (2013/C) (ex 2011/NN) — Netherlands aid to certain professional Dutch football clubs in 2008-11 — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ C 116, 23.4.2013, p. 19).
Odločitve Komisije glede Nemčije z dne 20. marca 2013 v zadevah Multifunktionsarena der Stadt Erfurt (zadeva SA.35135 (2012/N), točka 12) in Multifunktionsarena der Stadt Jena (zadeva SA.35440 (2012/N), povzetki v UL C 140, 18.5.2013, str. 1) in z dne 2. oktobra 2013 v zadevi Fußballstadion Chemnitz (zadeva SA.36105 (2013/N), povzetek v UL C 50, 21.2.2014, str. 1, točke od 12 do 14); odločitve Komisije glede Španije z dne 18. decembra 2013 v zadevi o morebitni državni pomoči štirim španskim profesionalnim nogometnim klubom (zadeva SA.29769 (2013/C), točka 28); v zadevi Real Madrid CF (zadeva SA.33754 (2013/C), točka 20) in v zadevi o domnevni pomoči trem nogometnim klubom v Valencii (zadeva SA.36387 (2013/C), točka 16), objavljene v UL C 69, 7.3.2014, str. 99.
Cf. footnote 1.
Glede na preizkus načela vlagatelja v tržem gospodarstvu ne bi šlo za državno pomoč, če bi bil zasebni vlagatelj, ki deluje v običajnih tržnih pogojih v tržnem gospodarstvu, v podobnih okoliščinah upravičencu pripravljen zagotoviti obravnavane ukrepe.
Council Decision (EU) 2016/1850
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/1850
on the signature and provisional application of the stepping stone Economic Partnership Agreement between Ghana, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part
o podpisu in začasni uporabi vmesnega Sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu med Gano na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi strani
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 133 and 181 in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 133 in 181 v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe,
On 12 June 2002 the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations of Economic Partnership Agreements with ACP countries.
Svet je 12. junija 2002 pooblastil Komisijo za začetek pogajanj o sklenitvi sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu z državami AKP.
Negotiations of a stepping stone Economic Partnership Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the ‘stepping stone EPA’) have been concluded with Ghana and the stepping stone EPA was initialled on 13 December 2007.
Pogajanja o vmesnem Sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vmesni SGP) so bila zaključena z Gano in vmesni SGP je bil parafiran 13. decembra 2007.
Article 75 of the stepping stone EPA provides for its provisional application pending its entry into force.
Člen 75 vmesnega SGP predvideva začasno uporabo Sporazuma do začetka njegove veljavnosti.
The stepping stone EPA should be signed on behalf of the Community and applied, as concerns elements falling within the competence of the Community, on a provisional basis subject to its conclusion at a later date,
Vmesni SGP bi bilo treba podpisati v imenu Skupnosti ter ga v zvezi z določbami, ki so v pristojnosti Skupnosti, uporabljati začasno, s pridržkom njegove poznejše sklenitve –
The signing of the stepping stone Economic Partnership Agreement between Ghana, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, is hereby approved on behalf of the Community, subject to the Council Decision concerning the conclusion of the said Agreement.
Podpis vmesnega Sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu med Gano na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi strani se odobri v imenu Skupnosti s pridržkom sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi navedenega Sporazuma.
The text of the stepping stone EPA is attached to this Decision.
Besedilo vmesnega SGP je priloženo k temu sklepu.
For the purposes of Article 73(2) of the stepping stone EPA, the EPA Committee shall be composed, on the one hand, of the members of the Council and of representatives of the Commission and, on the other hand, of representatives of the Government of Ghana.
Za namene člena 73(2) vmesnega SGP je Odbor SGP sestavljen iz članov Sveta in predstavnikov Komisije na eni strani in predstavnikov vlade Gane na drugi strani.
The Commission shall propose to the Council, for its decision, the position of the European Community with a view to the negotiation of the EPA Committee's rules of procedure.
Komisija predloži Svetu v odločitev stališče Skupnosti glede pogajanj o poslovniku Odbora SGP.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the stepping stone EPA on behalf of the European Community subject to its conclusion.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno(-e) za podpis Sporazuma v imenu Evropske Skupnosti s pridržkom njegove sklenitve.
As concerns elements falling within the competence of the Community, the stepping stone EPA shall be applied on a provisional basis as provided for in Article 75 thereof, pending completion of the procedure for its conclusion.
V zvezi z določbami, ki so v pristojnosti Skupnosti, se vmesni SGP do zaključka postopka sklenitve v skladu s členom 75 vmesnega SGP uporablja začasno.
The Commission shall publish a notice providing information on the date of provisional application.
Komisija bo v obvestilu objavila datum začasne uporabe.
Done in Brussels, 21 November 2008.
V Bruslju, 21. novembra 2008
Decision (EU) 2016/1856 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (EU) 2016/1856
on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Greece
o uporabi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije za zagotavljanje pomoči Grčiji
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management [2], and in particular point 11 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 2. decembra 2013 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini, sodelovanju v proračunskih zadevah in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju [2] ter zlasti točke 11 tega sporazuma,
The European Union Solidarity Fund (‘the Fund’) aims to enable the Union to respond in a rapid, efficient and flexible manner to emergency situations in order to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by natural disasters.
Namen Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklad) je omogočiti Uniji, da se hitro, učinkovito in prožno odziva na izredne razmere in tako izkaže svojo solidarnost s prebivalstvom območij, ki so jih prizadele naravne nesreče.
The Fund is not to exceed a maximum annual amount of EUR 500000000 (2011 prices), as laid down in Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 [3].
Sredstva sklada ne presegajo najvišjega letnega zneska 500000000 EUR (v cenah iz leta 2011), kot je določeno v členu 10 Uredbe Sveta (EU, Euratom) št. 1311/2013 [3].
On 5 February 2016, Greece submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, following an earthquake that affected the Ionian Islands in November 2015.
Grčija je 5. februarja 2016 predložila vlogo za uporabo sredstev sklada zaradi potresa, ki je prizadel Jonske otoke novembra 2015.
The application by Greece meets the conditions for providing a financial contribution from the Fund, as laid down in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002.
Vloga Grčije izpolnjuje zahteve za izplačilo finančnega prispevka iz sklada v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 2012/2002.
The Fund should therefore be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution to Greece.
Zato bi bilo treba uporabiti sredstva sklada, da bo zagotovljen finančni prispevek za Grčijo.
By Decision (EU) 2016/252 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] the European Union Solidarity Fund was mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 50 million in commitment and payment appropriations for the payment of advances for the financial year 2016.
V skladu s Sklepom (EU) 2016/252 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] je bil Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije uporabljen za zagotovitev zneska v višini 50 milijonov EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvah plačil za predplačila za proračunsko leto 2016.
Those appropriations have only been used to a very limited extent.
Ta sredstva so bila uporabljena le v zelo omejenem obsegu.
Consequently, there is scope for financing the full amount for the present mobilisation through the reallocation of appropriations available for the payment of advances in the general budget of the Union for the financial year 2016.
Torej bi bilo mogoče celoten znesek, ki bo uporabljen v tem primeru, financirati s prerazporeditvijo odobritev za predplačila, ki so na voljo v splošnem proračunu Unije za proračunsko leto 2016.
In order to minimise the time taken to mobilise the Fund, this Decision should apply from the date of its adoption,
Da bi sredstva iz sklada lahko čim prej uporabili, bi bilo treba ta sklep uporabljati od datuma sprejetja –
For the general budget of the Union for the financial year 2016, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the amount of EUR 1651834 to Greece, in commitment and payment appropriations.
V okviru splošnega proračuna Unije za proračunsko leto 2016 se Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije uporabi za zagotovitev zneska v višini 1651834 EUR za Grčijo, in sicer v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvah plačil.
The amount of the mobilisation referred to in the first paragraph shall be financed from the appropriations mobilised for the payment of advances in the Union budget for the financial year 2016.
Znesek iz prvega odstavka, za katerega se uporabi sklad, se financira iz odobritev za predplačila v proračunu Unije za proračunsko leto 2016.
The appropriations available for the payment of advances shall be reduced accordingly.
Sredstva, ki so na voljo za plačilo predplačil, se ustrezno znižajo.
It shall apply from 11 October 2016.
Uporablja se od 11. oktobra 2016.
Done at Brussels, 11 October 2016.
V Bruslju, 11. oktobra 2016
Decision (EU) 2016/252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund for the payment of advances (OJ L 47, 24.2.2016, p. 5).
Sklep (EU) 2016/252 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2015 o uporabi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije za plačilo predplačil (UL L 47, 24.2.2016, str. 5).
Decision (EU) 2016/1857 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (EU) 2016/1857
on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (following an application from Finland — EGF/2016/001 FI/Microsoft)
o uporabi Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji (na podlagi vloge iz Finske – EGF/2016/001 FI/Microsoft)
On 11 March 2016 Finland submitted an application to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in Microsoft (Microsoft Mobile Oy) and 8 suppliers and downstream producers.
Finska je 11. marca 2016 vložila vlogo za uporabo sredstev ESPG v zvezi z odpusti v podjetju Microsoft (Microsoft Mobile Oy) ter pri osmih dobaviteljih in proizvajalcih v poproizvodni fazi.
It was supplemented by additional information provided in accordance with Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013.
Vloga je bila dopolnjena z dodatnimi informacijami, v skladu s členom 8(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 1309/2013.
That application complies with the requirements for determining a financial contribution from the EGF as laid down in Article 13 of Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013.
Vloga izpolnjuje zahteve za določitev finančnega prispevka iz ESPG v skladu s členom 13 Uredbe (EU) št. 1309/2013.
The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution of EUR 5364000 in respect of the application submitted by Finland.
Zato bi bilo treba uporabiti sredstva ESPG, da se zagotovi finančni prispevek v višini 5364000 EUR za vlogo, ki jo je vložila Finska.
In order to minimise the time taken to mobilise the EGF, this decision should apply from the date of its adoption,
Da bi sredstva ESPG lahko čim prej uporabili, bi bilo treba ta sklep uporabljati od datuma sprejetja –
For the general budget of the Union for the financial year 2016, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund shall be mobilised to provide the amount of EUR 5364000 in commitment and payment appropriations.
V okviru splošnega proračuna Unije za proračunsko leto 2016 se iz Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji uporabi znesek 5364000 EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvah plačil.
Decision (EU) 2016/1858 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (EU) 2016/1858
on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (following an application from Sweden — EGF/2016/002 SE/Ericsson)
o uporabi sredstev Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji (na podlagi vloge Švedske – EGF/2016/002 SE/Ericsson)
On 31 March 2016, Sweden submitted an application to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in Ericsson (Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson) in Sweden.
Švedska je 31. marca 2016 vložila vlogo za uporabo sredstev ESPG v zvezi z odpusti v podjetju Ericsson (Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson) na Švedskem.
The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution of EUR 3957918 in respect of the application submitted by Sweden.
Zato bi bilo treba uporabiti sredstva ESPG, da se zagotovi finančni prispevek v višini 3957918 EUR za vlogo, ki jo je vložila Švedska.
For the general budget of the Union for the financial year 2016, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund shall be mobilised to provide the amount of EUR 3957918 in commitment and payment appropriations.
V okviru splošnega proračuna Unije za proračunsko leto 2016 se iz Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji uporabi znesek 3957918 EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvah plačil.
Council Decision (EU) 2016/1859
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/1859
on the Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment and repealing Decision 2003/174/EC
o Tristranskem socialnem vrhu za rast in zaposlovanje in razveljavitvi Sklepa 2003/174/ES
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 352 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 352 Pogodbe,
Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) provides that one of the objectives of the Union is to work for a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress.
Člen 3(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) določa, da je eden od ciljev Unije visoko konkurenčno socialno tržno gospodarstvo, usmerjeno v polno zaposlenost in socialni napredek.
In defining and implementing its policies and activities, the Union is to take into account their social dimension, in particular the requirements linked to the promotion of a high level of employment, the guarantee of adequate social protection, the fight against social exclusion, and a high level of education, training and protection of human health, in accordance with Article 9 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju svojih politik in dejavnosti Unija v skladu s členom 9 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) upošteva njihovo socialno razsežnost, še posebej zahteve, povezane s spodbujanjem visoke stopnje zaposlenosti, zagotavljanjem ustrezne socialne zaščite, bojem proti socialni izključenosti in visoko stopnjo izobraževanja in usposabljanja ter varovanjem človekovega zdravja.
The Union recognises and promotes the role of the social partners at its level and facilitates dialogue between them while respecting their autonomy, in accordance with Article 152 TFEU.
Unija v skladu s členom 152 PDEU priznava in spodbuja vlogo socialnih partnerjev na ravni EU in pospešuje dialog med njimi ob upoštevanju njihove avtonomije.
To promote a high-level concertation with the European social partners on the overall strategy set up by the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000, Council Decision 2003/174/EC [1] established a Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment (‘the Summit’).
Za spodbujanje posvetovanja na visoki ravni z evropskimi socialnimi partnerji o splošni strategiji, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel na zasedanju v Lizboni 23. in 24. marca 2000, je bil s Sklepom Sveta 2003/174/ES [1] vzpostavljen Tristranski socialni vrh za rast in zaposlovanje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vrh).
The Summit is now recognised in Article 152 TFEU as an integral component of social dialogue at Union level.
Vrh je zdaj v členu 152 PDEU priznan kot sestavni del socialnega dialoga na ravni Unije.
The Union and its Member States are committed to cooperating within the framework of the Europe 2020 strategy, an integrated strategy designed to boost the Union's potential for growth and jobs over the period 2010-2020 (‘the Europe 2020 strategy’).
Unija in njene države članice so se zavezale k sodelovanju v okviru strategije Evropa 2020, celostne strategije, namenjene spodbujanju potenciala Unije za rast in delovna mesta v obdobju 2010–2020 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: strategija Evropa 2020).
The Europe 2020 strategy aims to increase coordination between national and Union policies.
Cilj strategije Evropa 2020 je okrepitev usklajevanja med nacionalnimi politikami in politikami Unije.