natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ireland is bound by Decision 2005/387/JHA and is therefore taking part in the adoption and application of this Decision, which implements Decision 2005/387/JHA.
Sklep 2005/387/PNZ je za Irsko zavezujoč, zato sodeluje pri sprejetju in uporabi tega sklepa, s katerim se izvaja Sklep 2005/387/PNZ.
The United Kingdom is not bound by Decision 2005/387/JHA and is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Decision, which implements Decision 2005/387/JHA, and is not bound by it or subject to its application,
Sklep 2005/387/PNZ ni zavezujoč za Združeno kraljestvo, zato ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, s katerim se izvaja Sklep 2005/387/PNZ in zanj ni zavezujoč niti se v njem ne uporablja –
The new psychoactive substance 1-phenyl-2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)pentan-1-one (α-pyrrolidinovalerophenone, α-PVP) shall be subjected to control measures across the Union.
Za novo psihoaktivno snov 1-fenil-2-(pirolidin-1-il) pentan-1-on (α-pirolidinovalerofenon, α-PVP) se uvedejo nadzorni ukrepi po vsej Uniji.
By 3 July 2017, Member States shall take the necessary measures, in accordance with their national law, to subject the new psychoactive substance referred to in Article 1 to control measures and criminal penalties, as provided for under their legislation, complying with their obligations under the 1971 United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances.
Države članice do 3. julija 2017 sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, da za novo psihoaktivno snov iz člena 1 uvedejo nadzorne ukrepe in kazenske sankcije, kot jih določa njihova zakonodaja v skladu z obveznostmi iz Konvencije Združenih narodov o psihotropnih snoveh iz leta 1971.
Done at Luxembourg, 27 June 2016.
V Bruslju, 27. junija 2016
Opinion of 8 June 2016 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 8. junija 2016 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/1071
Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2016/1071
of 1 July 2016
z dne 1. julija 2016
On 19 March 2015, the European Council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures to the complete implementation of the Minsk agreements, bearing in mind that the complete implementation was foreseen for 31 December 2015.
Evropski svet je 19. marca 2015 sklenil, da bodo sprejeti potrebni ukrepi za jasno povezanost trajanja omejevalnih ukrepov s celovitim izvajanjem sporazumov iz Minska, z upoštevanjem, da je bilo celovito izvajanje predvideno za 31. december 2015.
On 21 December 2015, the Council renewed Decision 2014/512/CFSP until 31 July 2016 in order to enable it to further assess the implementation of the Minsk agreements.
Svet je 21. decembra 2015 podaljšal Sklep 2014/512/SZVP do 31. julija 2016, da bi lahko nadalje ocenil izvajanje sporazumov iz Minska.
Having assessed the implementation of the Minsk agreements, Decision 2014/512/CFSP should be renewed for a further six months in order to enable the Council to further assess their implementation.
Po oceni izvajanja sporazumov iz Minska bi bilo treba Sklep 2014/512/SZVP podaljšati za nadaljnjih šest mesecev, da bi lahko Svet nadalje ocenil njihovo izvajanje.
Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,
Sklep 2014/512/SZVP bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
The first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP is replaced by the following:
Prvi pododstavek člena 9(1) Sklepa 2014/512/SZVP se nadomesti z naslednjim:
This Decision shall apply until 31 January 2017.’.
Ta sklep se uporablja do 31. januarja 2017.“
Done at Brussels, 1 July 2016.
V Bruslju, 1. julija 2016
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1072
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/1072
terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain ceramic foam filters originating in the People's Republic of China
o zaključku protidampinškega postopka za uvoz nekaterih penjenih keramičnih filtrov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1], and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], in zlasti člena 9(1) Uredbe,
On 14 August 2015, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated an anti-dumping investigation with regard to imports into the Union of certain ceramic foam filters originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’) on the basis of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (‘the basic Regulation’).
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 14. avgusta 2015 na podlagi člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 („osnovna uredba“) začela protidampinško preiskavo v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih penjenih keramičnih filtrov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) v Unijo.
The Commission initiated the investigation following a complaint lodged on 1 July 2015 by Vesuvius GmbH (‘the complainant’).
Komisija je preiskavo začela na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 1. julija 2015 vložila družba Vesuvius GmbH („pritožnik“).
The complainant represents more than 25 % of the total Union production of the ceramic foam filters in question.
Pritožnik predstavlja več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje penjenih keramičnih filtrov v Uniji.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the complainant, other known Union producers, the known exporting producers and the PRC's authorities, known importers, suppliers and users, traders, as well as associations known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate.
Poleg tega je o začetku preiskave posebej obvestila pritožnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, znane proizvajalce izvoznike ter kitajske organe, znane uvoznike, dobavitelje in uporabnike, trgovce ter združenja, za katera je znano, da jih to zadeva, in jih povabila k sodelovanju.
By the letter of 8 March 2016 addressed to the Commission, the complainant withdrew its complaint.
Pritožnik je z dopisom z dne 8. marca 2016, naslovljenim na Komisijo, umaknil svojo pritožbo.
In accordance with Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation, when the complainant withdraws its complaint, the proceeding may be terminated unless such termination would not be in the Union interest.
V skladu s členom 9(1) osnovne uredbe se postopek lahko ustavi, če pritožnik umakne pritožbo, razen če ta ustavitev ne bi bila v interesu Unije.
The Commission considered that the anti-dumping proceeding should be terminated since the investigation had not brought to light any consideration demonstrating that such termination would not be in the Union interest.
Komisija je menila, da je treba protidampinški postopek ustaviti, saj v preiskavi ni bilo ugotovljeno, da to ne bi bilo v interesu Unije.
The Commission therefore concludes that the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of certain ceramic foam filters originating in the PRC should be terminated.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih penjenih keramičnih filtrov s poreklom iz LRK v Unijo ustaviti.
This Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation,
Ta sklep je v skladu z mnenjem Odbora, ki ga določa člen 15(1) osnovne uredbe –
The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of ceramic foam filters characterised by average porosity of up to 60 ppi (pores per inch) and by thermal shock resistance capable of withstanding the change of temperature caused by the passage of molten metal from ambient temperature to a minimum of 1300 °C and made from ceramic material other than those:
Protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom penjenih keramičnih filtrov s povprečno poroznostjo do 60 ppi (por na palec) in takšno odpornostjo proti temperaturnim spremembam, da vzdržijo spremembo temperature s sobne temperature na najmanj 1300 °C pri prehodu raztaljenih kovin, narejeni iz keramičnega materiala, razen tistih:
of siliceous fossil meals or of similar siliceous earths, or
iz silikatne fosilne moke ali podobnih silikatnih zemljin ali
containing zirconia (zirconium dioxide ZrO2) in quantities greater than fifty percent by weight,
ki vsebujejo več kot 50 mas. % cirkonij (cirkonijev oksid ZrO2),
originating in the People's Republic of China and currently falling within CN codes ex69031000, ex69032010, ex69032090, ex69039010, ex69039090 and ex69091900 is hereby terminated.
s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in trenutno uvrščenih pod oznake KN ex69031000, ex69032010, ex69032090, ex69039010, ex69039090 in ex69091900, v Unijo se ustavi.
51.
Obvestilo o začetku protidampinškega postopka za uvoz nekaterih penjenih keramičnih filtrov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL C 266, 14.8.2015, str. 14).
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1073
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/1073
on the equivalence of designated contract markets in the United States of America in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o enakovrednosti določenih pogodbenih trgov v Združenih državah Amerike v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories [1], and in particular Article 2a(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. julija 2012 o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, centralnih nasprotnih strankah in repozitorijih sklenjenih poslov [1] in zlasti člena 2a(2) Uredbe,
Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 lays down clearing and bilateral risk-management requirements for over-the-counter (‘OTC’) derivative contracts as well as reporting requirements for such contracts.
Uredba (EU) št. 648/2012 določa zahteve za kliring in dvostransko obvladovanje tveganja za pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC ter zahteve za poročanje o takih pogodbah.
Point (7) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 defines OTC derivatives as derivative contracts the execution of which does not take place on a regulated market within the meaning of point (14) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and the of the Council [2] or on a third country market considered as equivalent to a regulated market in accordance with Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Točka (7) člena 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 izvedene finančne instrumente OTC opredeljuje kot pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih, ki se ne izvršijo na reguliranem trgu v smislu točke (14) člena 4(1) Direktive 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] ali na trgu tretje države, ki se šteje za enakovrednega reguliranemu trgu v skladu s členom 2a Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012.
Therefore, any derivative contract the execution of which takes place on a third country market not deemed equivalent to regulated markets are classified as OTC for the purposes of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Zato se pogodbe o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih, ki se izvršijo na trgu tretje države, ki se ne šteje za enakovrednega reguliranemu trgu, za namene Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 razvrstijo med izvedene finančne instrumente OTC.
In accordance with Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, a third-country market is considered equivalent to a regulated market where it complies with legally binding requirements which are equivalent to the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC and is subject to effective supervision and enforcement in that third country on an ongoing basis.
V skladu s členom 2a Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 se trg tretje države šteje za enakovrednega reguliranemu trgu, kadar izpolnjuje pravno zavezujoče zahteve, ki so enakovredne zahtevam iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES, ter je predmet stalnega učinkovitega nadzora in izvrševanja v tej tretji državi.
In order for a third country market to be considered equivalent to a regulated market within the meaning of Directive 2004/39/EC, the substantive outcome of the applicable legally binding requirements and supervisory and enforcement arrangements should be equivalent to Union requirements in respect of the regulatory objectives they achieve.
Da bi se trg tretje države štel za enakovrednega reguliranemu trgu v smislu Direktive 2004/39/ES, bi morale biti veljavne pravno zavezujoče zahteve ter nadzorne in izvršitvene ureditve v smislu doseganja regulativnih ciljev v veliki meri enakovredne zahtevam Unije.
The purpose of this equivalence assessment is therefore to verify that the legally binding requirements which apply to designated contract markets (DCMs) in the United States of America (USA) are equivalent to the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC, and that those markets are subject to effective supervision and enforcement on an ongoing basis.
Namen te ocene enakovrednosti je torej preveriti, ali so pravno zavezujoče zahteve, ki se uporabljajo za določene pogodbene trge v Združenih državah Amerike, enakovredne zahtevam iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES ter ali so navedeni trgi predmet stalnega učinkovitega nadzora in izvrševanja.
Markets which are authorised as DCMs on the date of adoption of this Decision should be therefore identified as markets considered equivalent to a regulated market within the meaning of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Trge, ki so pridobili dovoljenje kot določeni pogodbeni trgi na datum sprejetja tega sklepa, je treba opredeliti kot trge, ki se štejejo za enakovredne reguliranemu trgu v skladu z Direktivo 2004/39/ES.
DCMs are boards of trade that operate under the regulatory oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the CFTC) pursuant to Section 5 of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), 7 USC 7.
Določeni pogodbeni trgi so organizirani sistemi trgovanja, ki delujejo pod regulativnim nadzorom Komisije za trgovanje z blagovnimi terminskimi pogodbami (Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC) v skladu z oddelkom 5 Zakona o blagovni borzi (Commodity Exchange Act, CEA) 7, USC 7.
The legally binding requirements for DCMs authorised in the USA consist of the CEA, which together with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's regulations (CFTC regulations) establish the legal framework for the operation of the DCM.
Pravno zavezujoče zahteve za določene pogodbene trge, ki imajo dovoljenje v ZDA, so navedene v CEA, ki skupaj s predpisi Komisije za trgovanje z blagovnimi terminskimi pogodbami (v nadaljnjem besedilu: predpisi CFTC) sestavljajo pravni okvir za delovanje določenih pogodbenih trgov.
Part 38 of the CFTC's regulations specifies the requirements for operating as a board of trade and sets out 23 core principles that DCMs must comply with on an initial and ongoing basis.
Del 38 predpisov CFTC določa zahteve za delovanje organiziranih sistemov trgovanja ter navaja 23 temeljnih načel, ki jih morajo določeni pogodbeni trgi od začetka in nenehno upoštevati.
The CFTC regulations require DCMs to operate a trading facility which generally, under the CEA, means a multilateral system in which participants have the ability to execute transactions in accordance with non-discretionary rules.
V skladu s predpisi CFTC morajo določeni pogodbeni trgi uporabljati sistem trgovanja, ki je v skladu s CEA običajno večstranski sistem trgovanja, v katerem udeleženci lahko izvršujejo posle v skladu z nediskrecijskimi pravili.
DCMs must provide members with impartial access to their markets and services.
Določeni pogodbeni trgi morajo članom zagotoviti nepristranski dostop do svojih trgov in storitev.
The access criteria must be impartial, transparent, and applied in a non-discriminatory manner.
Merila za dostop morajo biti nepristranska, pregledna in se uporabljati nediskriminatorno.
In addition, CFTC regulations subject DCMs to organisational requirements with regards to conflicts of interest policy, risk management, trading and clearing and settlement arrangements, listing rules as well as monitoring of compliance.
Poleg tega predpisi CFTC določenim pogodbenim trgom nalagajo organizacijske zahteve glede politik na področju nasprotij interesov, upravljanja tveganj, ureditev trgovanja, kliringa in poravnav, predpisov za kotiranje na borzi ter nadzora skladnosti.
To this end, it must have the capacity to detect, investigate and apply appropriate sanctions to any person that violates any internal rule of the DCM.
V skladu z Direktivo 2004/39/ES se zahteve glede preglednosti pred trgovanjem in po njem uporabljajo samo za delnice, uvrščene v trgovanje na reguliranih trgih.
The legally binding requirements applicable to DCMs authorised in the USA which are set out in the legal framework for the operation of DCMs deliver substantial results equivalent to those of the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC in the following areas: authorisation process, definitional requirements, access to the DCM, organisational requirements, requirements for senior management, admission of derivatives to trading, suspension and removal of derivatives from trading, monitoring of compliance and access to clearing and settlement arrangements.
Ker se na določenih pogodbenih trgih ne trguje z delnicami in te niso uvrščene v trgovanje, Komisija meni, da ocena zadevnih zahtev ni relevantna za namene tega ukrepa.
Under Directive 2004/39/EC, pre- and post-trade transparency requirements apply only to shares admitted to trading on regulated markets.
Zato je ustrezno zaključiti, da pravno zavezujoče zahteve za določene pogodbene trge, ustanovljene v ZDA, zagotavljajo rezultate, enakovredne zahtevam iz naslova III Direktive 2004/39/ES.
As shares are neither traded nor admitted to trading on DCMs, the Commission considers that the assessment of those requirements is not relevant for the purposes of this Decision
Določeni pogodbeni trgi delujejo pod nadzorom CFTC.
It should therefore be concluded that the legally binding requirements for DCMs established in the USA deliver results equivalent to those of the requirements laid down in Title III of Directive 2004/39/EC.
Glavni cilj programa CFTC glede skladnosti je oceniti skladnost določenega pogodbenega trga z veljavnimi določbami CEA, vključno s 23 temeljnimi načeli, ki jih morajo določeni pogodbeni trgi upoštevati, in predpisi CFTC, s katerimi se izvajajo navedena temeljna načela.
The DCMs operate under the supervision of the CFTC.
CFTC v ta namen preverja skladnost določenega pogodbenega trga s temeljnimi načeli in predpisi glede nadzora trgovanja, nadzora trga, revizijske sledi ter programov disciplinskih ukrepov za določene pogodbene trge.
The primary objective of the CFTC's compliance programme is to evaluate DCM compliance with applicable provisions of the CEA, including the 23 core principles with which DCMs must comply, and CFTC regulations implementing those core principles.
V skladu s programom za nadzor trga CFTC nadzira borzne trgovce, da zagotovi upoštevanje določb iz CEA in predpisov CFTC.
To this end, the CFTC conducts examinations of a DCM's compliance with core principles and regulations relating to trade surveillance, market surveillance, audit trail, and DCM disciplinary programmes.
V ta namen program za nadzor trga nadzira trgovanje na določenih pogodbenih trgih, terminske pogodbe, posle zamenjave in pozicije v poslih zamenjave (swap positions), da se odkrijejo in preprečijo zlorabe na trgu ter zagotovi skladnost s CEA in predpisi CFTC.
Under the market surveillance programme, the CFTC monitors traders to ensure that they comply with provisions in the CEA and CFTC regulations.
Poleg tega program za pregled trga pregleduje vso dokumentacijo glede pravil določenega pogodbenega trga, program za pregled produktov pa pregleduje dokumentacijo glede pogojev določenega pogodbenega trga v zvezi s produktom; oba programa pregledujeta dokumentacijo, da zagotovita skladnost s CEA in predpisi CFTC.
To this end, the surveillance programme monitors trading activity on DCMs, futures positions, swap transactions and swap positions in order to detect and prevent market abusive practices and to ensure compliance with the CEA and CFTC regulations.
CFTC je odgovorna tudi za izvršitve.
In addition, the market review programme reviews all DCM rule filings and the product review programme reviews DCM product terms and conditions filings; both programmes review the filings to ensure consistency with the CEA and the CFTC's regulations.
V skladu z oddelkom 6b Zakona o blagovni borzi lahko CFTC izda odredbo o prenehanju določenih dejavnosti ter naloži civilne ali kazenske sankcije, če se ugotovi, da določen pogodbeni trg krši CEA ali predpise CFTC.
The CFTC also has enforcement responsibilities.
V skladu z oddelkom 6c(a) lahko CFTC vloži tudi tožbo pred zveznim sodiščem ZDA proti vsakemu registriranemu subjektu ali drugi osebi, ki krši določbe CEA ter zadevne predpise, določbe in naročila CFTC.
Under CEA Section 6b, the CFTC may issue an order directing the cessation of specified activities and impose civil or criminal penalties if a DCM is found to violate the CEA or the CFTC's regulations.
Določeni pogodbeni trgi prevzemajo nekatere nadzorne naloge in od njih se zahteva, da nadzorujejo in zagotavljajo skladnost z notranjimi predpisi vsakega določenega pogodbenega trga.
Pursuant to CEA Section 6c(a)) the CFTC may also bring an action in US federal court against any registered entity or other person that violates provisions of the CEA as well as relevant CFTC rules, regulations and orders.
Zato je ustrezno zaključiti, da za določene pogodbene trge velja stalen učinkovit nadzor in izvrševanje v ZDA.
Under ‘emergency powers’ (CEA § 8a(9)) the CFTC is authorised to direct a DCM to take such action as, in the CFTC's judgment, is necessary to maintain or restore orderly trading in or liquidation of a given derivative contract.
Ta sklep temelji na pravno zavezujočih zahtevah za določene pogodbene trge, ki veljajo v ZDA v času sprejetja tega sklepa.
The DCMs are also required to have arrangements and resources for effective enforcement of its internal rules.
Komisija bi morala še naprej redno spremljati razvoj pravnih in nadzornih ureditev za določene pogodbene trge ter izpolnjevanje pogojev, na podlagi katerih je bil ta sklep sprejet.
It should therefore be concluded that DCMs are subject to effective supervision and enforcement in the USA on an ongoing basis.
Komisija bi morala ta sklep pregledati zlasti zaradi začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) št. 600/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] ter Direktive 2014/65/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].
The conditions laid down in Article 2a of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 should therefore be considered to be satisfied with respect to DCMs authorised in the USA.
Redni pregled pravnih in nadzornih ureditev, ki se uporabljajo za določene pogodbene trge v ZDA ne posega v možnost, ki Komisiji omogoča, da kadar koli izvede poseben pregled, če mora zaradi razvoja dogodkov ponovno oceniti enakovrednost, odobreno s tem sklepom.
This Decision is based on the legally binding requirements relating to DCMs applicable in the USA at the time of the adoption of this Decision.
Takšna ponovna ocena bi lahko privedla do razveljavitve tega sklepa.
The Commission should continue monitoring on a regular basis the evolution of the legal and supervisory arrangements for DCMs and the fulfilment of the conditions on the basis of which this Decision has been taken.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Evropskega odbora za vrednostne papirje –
In particular, the Commission should review this Decision in light of the entry into application of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] and Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
The regular review of the legal and supervisory arrangements applicable to DCMs in the USA is without prejudice to the possibility of the Commission to undertake a specific review at any time where relevant developments make it necessary for the Commission to reassess the equivalence granted by this Decision.
Člen 1