natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The request was lodged by AFM Aluminiumfolie Merseburg GmbH, Alcomet AD, Eurofoil Luxembourg SA, Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products GmbH, Impol d.o.o. and Symetal SA, (‘the applicants’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of certain aluminium foils.
Zahtevek so vložile družbe AFM Aluminiumfolie Merseburg GmbH, Alcomet AD, Eurofoil Luxembourg SA, Hydro Aluminium Rolled Products GmbH, Impol d.o.o. in Symetal S.A. („vložniki“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje nekaterih aluminijastih folij v Uniji.
The applicants did not request the initiation of an expiry review investigation of the anti-dumping measures against imports originating in Armenia.
Vložniki niso zahtevali začetka preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka protidampinških ukrepov proti uvozu s poreklom iz Armenije.
These measures therefore lapsed on 7 October 2014 [5].
Ti ukrepi so zato prenehali veljati 7. oktobra 2014 [5].
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced on 4 October 2014, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [6] (‘Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetu s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, in zato 4. oktobra 2014 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [6] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
In parallel, on 8 October 2014, the Commission announced the initiation of an anti-dumping investigation pursuant Article 5 of the basic Regulation with regard to imports into the Union of certain aluminium foils originating in Russia [7] (the ‘parallel investigation’).
Vzporedno je Komisija 8. oktobra 2014 napovedala začetek protidampinške preiskave v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih aluminijastih folij s poreklom iz Rusije v Unijo [7] („vzporedna preiskava“).
In that investigation, the Commission imposed in July 2015, by means of Regulation (EU) 2015/1081 [8], a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium foils originating in Russia.
V tej preiskavi je Komisija julija 2015 z Uredbo (EU) 2015/1081 [8] uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih folij s poreklom iz Rusije.
The provisional measures were imposed for a period of six months.
Začasni ukrepi so se uvedli za obdobje šestih mesecev.
On 17 December 2015, the Commission imposed, by means of Regulation (EU) No 2015/2385 [9], a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium foils originating in Russia.
Komisija je 17. decembra 2015 z Uredbo (EU) 2015/2385 [9] uvedla dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih folij s poreklom iz Rusije.
The two parallel investigations covered the same review investigation period and the same period considered as defined in recital 13.
Vzporedni preiskavi sta zajemali obdobje preiskave (v zvezi s pregledom) in obravnavano obdobje, ki sta navedeni v uvodni izjavi 13.
The investigation of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2013 to 30 September 2014 (the ‘review investigation period’).
Preiskava verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in škode je potekala v obdobju od 1. oktobra 2013 do 30. septembra 2014 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2011 to the end of the review investigation period (the ‘period considered’).
Proučevanje trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2011 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
The Commission officially advised the applicants, the other known Union producers, the exporting producers in Brazil and the PRC, the known importers, the users and traders known to be concerned, and the representatives of the exporting countries, of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila vložnike, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike iz Brazilije in LRK, znane uvoznike, uporabnike in trgovce, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in predstavnike držav izvoznic.
In its Notice of Initiation, the Commission announced that it might sample the exporting producers in the PRC, Union producers and unrelated importers in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku napovedala, da bo morda izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK, proizvajalcev Unije in nepovezanih uvoznikov v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
No sampling was foreseen for exporting producers in Brazil.
Vzorčenje ni bilo predvideno za proizvajalce izvoznike iz Brazilije.
Sampling of exporting producers in the PRC
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK
Out of 12 known Chinese producers, two submitted a reply to the sampling questionnaire.
Dva od 12 znanih kitajskih proizvajalcev sta predložila odgovore na vprašalnik za izbor vzorca.
In view of the limited number of cooperating companies, no sampling was required.
Ob upoštevanju omejenega števila sodelujočih družb vzorčenje ni bilo potrebno.
The sample consisted of six Union producers and their related companies, as the internal structure of the groups was unclear at the beginning of the investigation as far as it concerns the functions of producing and reselling the product in question.
Vzorec je vključeval šest proizvajalcev Unije in njihove povezane družbe, saj je bila na začetku preiskave nejasna notranja struktura skupin glede funkcij proizvodnje in nadaljnje prodaje zadevnega izdelka.
The sampled Union producers accounted for over 70 % of total Union production.
Vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije so predstavljali več kot 70 % celotne proizvodnje Unije.
In March 2015, one of the sampled Union producers sold all its activity including equipment, rights permits, obligations concerning employees and its existing contracts to a new company.
Eden od vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije je marca 2015 svojo celotno dejavnost, vključno z opremo, dovoljenji za uporabo pravic, obveznostmi v zvezi z zaposlenimi in svojimi obstoječimi pogodbami, prodal novi družbi.
As this change took place after the investigation period, it is not relevant for the investigation under Article 6(1) of the basic Regulation.
Ta sprememba ni pomembna za preiskavo iz člena 6(1) osnovne uredbe, ker je do nje prišlo po obdobju preiskave.
Five companies replied to the sampling form.
Obrazec za vzorčenje je izpolnilo pet družb.
Four of them were rewinders, i.e. industrial users which were importing the product concerned for further processing before re-selling it and one was a trader that did not, however, import the product concerned during the period considered.
Štiri od njih so bile previjalci, tj. industrijski uporabniki, ki so zadevni izdelek uvažali za nadaljnjo predelavo pred njegovo nadaljnjo prodajo, ena pa je bila trgovec, ki pa v zadevnem obdobju ni uvažal zadevnega izdelka.
Due to the limited number of companies having responded to the sampling form, sampling was not warranted.
Zaradi omejenega števila družb, ki so izpolnile obrazec za vzorčenje, vzorčenje ni bilo upravičeno.
Two other users came forward.
Javila sta se dva druga uporabnika.
A user's questionnaire was sent to them.
Poslan jima je bil vprašalnik za uporabnike.
Questionnaires and cooperation
Vprašalniki in sodelovanje
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for the purpose of a determination of dumping, resulting injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, za katere je menila, da so potrebne za ugotovitev dampinga, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the six sampled Union producers and their related companies, two Brazilian exporting producers and two Chinese exporting producers, one trader and the above six users identified in the Union.
Vprašalnike je poslala šestim vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije in njihovim povezanim družbam, dvema brazilskima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma in dvema kitajskima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma, enemu trgovcu in navedenim šestim znanim uporabnikom v Uniji.
Questionnaire replies were received from all sampled Union producers and from three users.
Izpolnjeni vprašalniki so bili prejeti od vseh vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije in treh uporabnikov.
Two Chinese exporting producers and one Brazilian producer replied to the questionnaire.
Vprašalnik so izpolnili dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika in en brazilski proizvajalec.
A second Brazilian producer had initially indicated its interest to cooperate with the investigation, but did not reply to the questionnaire.
Drug brazilski proizvajalec je v začetku pokazal interes za sodelovanje pri preiskavi, vendar ni izpolnil vprašalnika.
Consequently, a letter was sent to this company informing it of the Commission's intension to apply Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bil tej družbi poslan dopis, s katerim je bila seznanjena z namero Komisije o uporabi člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
The company responded that it would not fill in the questionnaire but that its views would be represented by the Brazilian Aluminium Association (Associação Brasileira do Aluminió, ‘ABAL’).
Družba je odgovorila, da ne bo izpolnila vprašalnika, vendar da bo njena stališča zastopalo brazilsko združenje za aluminij (Associação Brasileira do Aluminió, „ABAL“).
In addition, written submissions were received from ABAL.
Poleg tega so bila prejeta pisna stališča ABAL.
Aluminiumfolie Merseburg GmbH, Merseburg, Germany
Aluminiumfolie Merseburg GmbH, Merseburg, Nemčija,
Hydro Aluminium Slim SpA, Cisterna di Latina, Italy
Hydro Aluminium Slim S.p.a., Cisterna di Latina, Italija,
Impol d.o.o., Maribor, Slovenia
Impol d.o.o., Maribor, Slovenija, in
Symetal SA, Athens, Greece
Symetal S.A., Athens, Grčija.
Users:
Uporabnika:
Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co KG, Minden, Germany
Cofresco Frischhalteprodukte GmbH & Co KG, Minden, Nemčija,
Exporting producer in Brazil:
Proizvajalec izvoznik iz Brazilije:
Companhia Brasileira de Aluminio (CBA), São Paulo, Brazil
Companhia Brasileira de Aluminio (CBA), São Paulo, Brazilija.
Exporting producers in the PRC:
Proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK:
Zhenjiang Dingsheng Aluminium Industries Joint-Stock Limited Company, Zhenjiang, PRC, and its related companies Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Company, Hangzhou, PRC; Hangzhou Dinsheng Import & Export, Hangzhou, PRC; and Dingsheng Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co, Hong Kong.
Zhenjiang Dingsheng Aluminium Industries Joint-Stock Limited Company, Zhenjiang, LRK, in njene povezane družbe Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Company, Hangzhou, LRK, Hangzhou Dinsheng Import & Export, Hangzhou, LRK, in Dingsheng Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co, Hong Kong,
Ltd, Yantai, PRC
Ltd., Yantai, LRK.
Producers in the market economy country:
Proizvajalca iz države s tržnim gospodarstvom:
A.S, Istanbul, Turkey
A.S, Istanbul, Turčija,
Co., Ankara, Turkey
Co., Ankara, Turčija.
The product concerned is aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,008 mm and not more than 0,018 mm, not backed, not further worked than rolled, in rolls of a width not exceeding 650 mm and of a weight exceeding 10 kg (‘jumbo rolls’) originating in Brazil and the PRC, currently falling within CN code ex76071119 (TARIC code 7607111910) (‘the product concerned’).
Zadevni izdelek je aluminijasta folija debeline najmanj 0,008 mm, vendar največ 0,018 mm, brez podlage, samo valjana, vendar dalje ne obdelana, v zvitkih, širokih do vključno 650 mm in z maso več kot 10 kg („veliki zvitki“), s poreklom iz Brazilije in LRK, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN ex76071119 (oznaka TARIC 7607111910) („zadevni izdelek“).
The investigation showed that the product concerned, the product produced and sold on the Brazilian and Chinese domestic markets, the product produced and sold on the domestic market in Turkey, which served as an analogue country, and the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry have the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo zadevni izdelek, izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu Brazilije in Kitajske, izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu Turčije, ki je bila uporabljena kot primerljiva država, ter izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije, enake fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo.
The Commission therefore concluded that these products are alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da so si ti izdelki podobni v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether the expiry of the existing measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping from Brazil and the PRC.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping iz Brazilije in LRK zaradi izteka obstoječih ukrepov nadaljeval ali ponovil.
One producer from Brazil cooperated with the investigation.
V preiskavi je sodeloval en proizvajalec iz Brazilije.
Before the imposition of the original measures, the producer had represented 100 % of the exports of AHF from Brazil to the Union.
Pred uvedbo prvotnih ukrepov je proizvajalec predstavljal 100 % izvoza AHF iz Brazilije v Unijo.
Absence of exports during the review investigation period
Odsotnost izvoza v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom
There were no exports of AHF from Brazil to the Union during the review investigation period.
V obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom se AHF ni izvažala iz Brazilije v Unijo.
Therefore, there is no likelihood of continuation of dumping from Brazil.
Zato se damping iz Brazilije verjetno ne bo nadaljeval.
The assessment was thus limited to the likelihood of recurrence of dumping using export prices to other third countries.
Ocena je bila tako omejena na verjetnost ponovitve dampinga ob uporabi izvoznih cen za druge tretje države.
When doing so, the following elements were analysed: the production capacity and spare capacity in Brazil, the absence of dumping from Brazil to other markets, and the attractiveness of the Union market.
Pri tem so bili analizirani naslednji elementi: proizvodna zmogljivost in prosta zmogljivost v Braziliji, odsotnost dampinga iz Brazilije na drugih trgih in privlačnost trga Unije.
Production capacity and spare capacity in Brazil
Proizvodna zmogljivost in prosta zmogljivost v Braziliji
The capacity utilisation of the cooperating Brazilian producer was found to be above 90 % and its unused spare capacity to be 3000 tonnes per year.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je izkoriščenost zmogljivosti sodelujočega brazilskega proizvajalca večja od 90 %, njegova neizkoriščena prosta zmogljivost pa je 3000 ton na leto.
This is equivalent to 6 % of the production of the Union industry and 3 % of the Union consumption.
To je enako 6 % proizvodnje industrije Unije in 3 % potrošnje Unije.
It was therefore concluded that there was no significant spare capacity that could be directed to the Union market should the measures against Brazil be allowed to lapse.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da ni znatne proste zmogljivosti, ki bi se lahko usmerila na trg Unije, če bi se ukrepi proti Braziliji iztekli.
The other two known Brazilian producers did not cooperate with the investigation, and therefore their spare capacity could not be verified.
Druga dva znana brazilska proizvajalca nista sodelovala pri preiskavi, zato njune proste zmogljivosti ni bilo mogoče preveriti.
A study submitted by the applicants estimated the combined capacity for aluminium foils of the two other producers to be 58000 tonnes for all types of aluminium foil combined, equivalent to the total capacity of the cooperating Brazilian producer.
V študiji, ki so jo predložili vložniki, je bilo ocenjeno, da je skupna zmogljivost za aluminijaste folije dveh drugih proizvajalcev 58000 ton za vse vrste aluminijaste folije skupaj, kar je enako celotni zmogljivosti sodelujočega brazilskega proizvajalca.
It is considered unlikely that these two producers would have a significant spare capacity that would be directed to the Union market, should the measures against Brazil be allowed to lapse: they were not exporting to the Union, neither during the review investigation period, nor before the imposition of the original measures.
Šteje se za malo verjetno, da bi imela ta proizvajalca znatno prosto zmogljivost, ki bi se lahko usmerila na trg Unije, če bi se ukrepi proti Braziliji iztekli: proizvajalca nista izvažala v Unijo niti v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom niti pred uvedbo prvotnih ukrepov.
Absence of dumping from Brazil to other markets
Odsotnost dampinga iz Brazilije na drugih trgih
These exports represented 68 % of total Brazilian AHF exports to the USA in 2013, making the cooperating producer the biggest Brazilian exporter of aluminium foils.
Ta izvoz je predstavljal 68 % celotnega brazilskega izvoza AHF v ZDA leta 2013, zaradi česar je bil sodelujoči proizvajalec največji brazilski izvoznik aluminijaste folije.
These exports represented 33 % of all Brazilian AHF exports in 2013.
Odsotnost dampinga je bila ugotovljena z uporabo metodologije, kot je navedena v nadaljevanju.
No dumping was found in these exports when the export price was compared with the normal value in Brazil.
Normalna vrednost
The absence of dumping was determined using the methodology as set out below.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej proučila, ali je bil celoten obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka s strani sodelujočega proizvajalca iz Brazilije neodvisnim strankam reprezentativen v primerjavi s celotnim obsegom izvoza, tj. ali je celoten obseg take domače prodaje predstavljal vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvozne prodaje zadevnega izdelka iz Brazilije.
Normal value
Na podlagi tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila domača prodaja v Braziliji reprezentativna.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation the Commission first examined whether the total volume of domestic sales of the like product to independent customers made by the cooperating producer in Brazil was representative in comparison with the total export volume, namely whether the total volume of such domestic sales represented at least 5 % of the total volume of export sales of the product concerned from Brazil.
Komisija je nato proučila, ali se domača prodaja podobnega izdelka lahko šteje za prodajo v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
On that basis, it was found that the domestic sales in Brazil were representative.
To se je izvedlo tako, da se je določil delež dobičkonosne domače prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
The Commission then examined whether the domestic sales of the like product could be regarded as being made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Za domačo prodajo je bilo ugotovljeno, da se izvaja v običajnem poteku trgovanja.
This was done by establishing the proportion of domestic sales to independent customers on the domestic market which were profitable during the review investigation period.
Zato je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, ki je bila izračunana kot tehtana povprečna cena dobičkonosne domače prodaje v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
The domestic sales were found to be made in the ordinary course of trade.
Določanje izvozne cene
Normal value was thus based on the actual domestic price, which was calculated as a weighted average price of the profitable domestic sales made during the review investigation period.
Izvozna cena je bila določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe na podlagi izvoznih cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo prvi neodvisni stranki.
Determination of the export price
Primerjava
The export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable to the first independent customer.
Normalna vrednost in izvozna cena sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika sta bili primerjani na podlagi cene franko tovarna.
Comparison
Da bi se zagotovila poštena primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno, so se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe v obliki prilagoditev ustrezno upoštevale razlike, ki vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen.
The normal value and export price of the cooperating exporting producer were compared on an ex-works basis.
Na podlagi tega so se opravile prilagoditve za razlike v zvezi s fizikalnimi lastnostmi, stroški kopenskega in čezmorskega prevoza, stroški zavarovanja, manipulativnimi stroški, stroški natovarjanja in tozadevnimi stroški, stroški pakiranja in kredita, popusti in provizijami, če se je pokazalo, da vplivajo na primerljivost cen.
On this basis, adjustments were made for differences in physical characteristics, transport, ocean freight and insurance costs, handling loading and ancillary costs, packing costs, credit costs, discounts and commissions where demonstrated to affect price comparability.
Na podlagi tega je Komisija ugotovila, da pri izvozu v ZDA ni bil prisoten damping.
Dumping margin
Komisija zato meni, da ni verjetno, da bi proizvajalci izvozniki iz Brazilije v primeru razveljavitve veljavnih ukrepov prodajali zadevni izdelek na trg Unije po dampinških cenah.
On this basis, the Commission found that there was no dumping occurring in the exports to the USA.
Privlačnost trga Unije
Therefore, the Commission considers that it is unlikely that, if the current measures were to be repealed, the exporting producers from Brazil would sell the product concerned to the Union market at dumped prices.
Cene na brazilskem domačem trgu so privlačne, na kar kaže dejstvo, da se velika večina proizvodnje proda na domačem trgu.
Attractiveness of the Union market
Ta domača prodaja je dobičkonosna.
The prices in the Brazilian domestic market are attractive, as demonstrated by the fact that the vast majority of the production is sold on the domestic market.
Ravni cen v Braziliji so podobne cenam na trgu Unije.
These domestic sales are profitable.
Zato se ne pričakuje, da bi se v primeru izteka ukrepov brazilski izvoz na trg Unije znatno povečal z nelojalnim znižanjem cen Unije.
The price levels in Brazil are similar to the prices in the Union market.
Trditve zainteresiranih strani v zvezi z verjetnostjo ponovitve dampinga iz Brazilije
It is therefore not expected that, should the measures lapse, the Brazilian exports to the Union market would increase significantly by undercutting the Union prices.
Zainteresirani strani ABAL in CBA sta trdili, da ni verjetno, da bi se damping iz Brazilije ponovil, in sicer iz naslednjih razlogov:
Claims by the interested parties concerning likelihood of recurrence of dumping from Brazil
odsotnost brazilskega izvoza zadevnega izdelka na trg Unije;
Two interested parties, ABAL and CBA, claimed that there is no likelihood of recurrence of dumping from Brazil for the following reasons:
Brazilija je zaradi naraščajočega domačega povpraševanja pred kratkim postala neto uvoznica aluminija, namesto da bi bila neto izvoznica;
absence of Brazilian exports of the product concerned to the Union market;
zvišanje proizvodnih stroškov zaradi višjih stroškov surovin in električne energije, kar je povzročilo izgubo konkurenčnosti brazilskih izdelkov;
Brazil recently becoming a net importer of aluminium instead of being a net exporter due to the increasing domestic demand in Brazil;
odsotnost množičnega izvoza konverterskih aluminijastih folij, tj. podobnega izdelka, za katerega se ne uporabljajo protidampinški ukrepi, iz Brazilije v Unijo;