natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Directive 90/314/EEC has given discretion to the Member States to determine whether retailers, organisers or both retailers and organisers are liable for the proper performance of a package.
Direktiva 90/314/EGS državam članicam daje diskrecijsko pravico, da določijo, ali za ustrezno izvedbo turističnega paketa odgovarjajo turistični agenti, organizatorji ali eni in drugi.
That flexibility has led to ambiguity in some Member States as to which trader is liable for the performance of the relevant travel services.
Ta prožnost je v nekaterih državah članicah povzročila dvoumnost glede tega, kateri trgovec je odgovoren za izvedbo zadevnih potovalnih storitev.
Therefore, it should be clarified in this Directive that organisers are responsible for the performance of the travel services included in the package travel contract, unless national law provides that both the organiser and the retailer are liable.
Zato bi bilo treba v tej direktivi pojasniti, da so za izvedbo potovalnih storitev, vključenih v pogodbo o paketnem potovanju, odgovorni organizatorji, razen če sta po nacionalnem pravu odgovorna organizator in turistični agent.
In relation to packages, retailers should be responsible together with the organiser for the provision of pre-contractual information.
V zvezi s turističnimi paketi bi morali biti turistični agenti skupaj z organizatorjem odgovorni za zagotavljanje predpogodbenih informacij.
In order to facilitate communication, in particular in cross-border cases, travellers should be able to contact the organiser also via the retailer through which they purchased the package.
Potniki bi morali zaradi lažje komunikacije, zlasti v čezmejnih primerih, imeti možnost, da z organizatorjem pridejo v stik tudi prek turističnega agenta, pri katerem so kupili turistični paket.
The traveller should receive all necessary information before purchasing a package, whether it is sold through means of distance communication, over the counter or through other types of distribution.
Potnik bi moral vse potrebne informacije prejeti pred nakupom turističnega paketa, ne glede na to, ali se prodaja prek sredstev za komuniciranje na daljavo, prek pulta ali prek drugih vrst distribucije.
In providing that information, the trader should take into account the specific needs of travellers who are particularly vulnerable because of their age or physical infirmity, which the trader could reasonably foresee.
Pri zagotavljanju teh informacij bi moral trgovec upoštevati posebne potrebe potnikov, ki so posebej ranljivi zaradi svoje starosti ali fizične hibe, ki bi jih trgovec lahko razumno predvidel.
Key information, for example on the main characteristics of the travel services or the prices, provided in advertisements, on the organiser's website or in brochures as part of the pre-contractual information, should be binding, unless the organiser reserves the right to make changes to those elements and unless such changes are clearly, comprehensibly and prominently communicated to the traveller before the conclusion of the package travel contract.
Ključne informacije, na primer o glavnih značilnostih potovalnih storitev ali cene iz reklam na spletnem mestu organizatorja ali v katalogih kot del predpogodbenih informacij, bi morale biti zavezujoče, razen če si organizator pridržuje pravico, da spremeni te elemente, ter če je potnik o takih spremembah jasno, razumljivo in vidno obveščen pred sklenitvijo pogodbe o paketnem potovanju.
However, in the light of new communication technologies, which easily allow updates, there is no longer any need to lay down specific rules on brochures, while it is appropriate to ensure that, changes to pre-contractual information are communicated to the traveller.
Vendar glede na nove komunikacijske tehnologije, ki omogočajo enostavno posodabljanje podatkov, ni več treba določati posebnih pravil glede katalogov, je pa ustrezno zagotoviti, da se potnika obvesti o spremembah predpogodbenih informacij.
It should always be possible to make changes to pre-contractual information where expressly agreed by both parties to the package travel contract.
Vedno bi moralo biti mogoče spremeniti predpogodbene informacije, kadar se s tem izrecno strinjata obe stranki pogodbe o paketnem potovanju.
The information requirements laid down in this Directive are exhaustive, but should be without prejudice to the information requirements laid down in other applicable Union legislation [5].
Zahteve v zvezi z informacijami v tej direktivi so izčrpne, a ne bi smele posegati v zahteve v zvezi z informacijami iz druge zakonodaje Unije [5], ki se uporablja.
Organisers should provide general information on the visa requirements of the country of destination.
Organizatorji bi morali zagotoviti splošne informacije o vizumskih zahtevah v državi potovanja.
The information on approximate periods for obtaining visas can be provided as a reference to official information of the country of destination.
Informacije o okvirnih obdobjih za pridobitev vizumov se lahko zagotovijo z napotilom na uradne informacije v državi potovanja.
Taking into account the specificities of package travel contracts, the rights and obligations of the contracting parties should be laid down for the period before and after the start of the package, in particular if the package is not properly performed or if particular circumstances change.
Pravice in obveznosti pogodbenih strank bi bilo treba določiti za obdobje pred začetkom turističnega paketa in po njegovem začetku, zlasti če turistični paket ni ustrezno izveden ali če se določene okoliščine spremenijo, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati posebnost pogodb o paketnem potovanju.
Since packages are often purchased a long time before their performance, unforeseen events may occur.
Ker so turistični paketi pogosto kupljeni veliko pred njihovo izvedbo, se lahko zgodijo nepričakovani dogodki.
Therefore the traveller should, under certain conditions, be entitled to transfer a package travel contract to another traveller.
Potnik bi zato moral imeti pod določenimi pogoji pravico, da pogodbo o paketnem potovanju prenese na drugega potnika.
In such situations, the organiser should be able to recover his expenses, for instance if a sub-contractor requires a fee for changing the name of the traveller or for cancelling a transport ticket and issuing a new one.
Organizatorju bi moralo biti v takih primerih omogočeno, da izterja svoje stroške, na primer če podizvajalec zahteva plačilo za spremembo imena potnika ali preklic vozovnice in izdajo nove.
Travellers should also be able to terminate the package travel contract at any time before the start of the package in return for payment of an appropriate and justifiable termination fee, taking into account expected cost savings and income from alternative deployment of the travel services.
Potniki bi morali imeti tudi možnost, da kadar koli pred začetkom turističnega paketa odstopijo od pogodbe o paketnem potovanju proti plačilu ustrezne in upravičene odstopnine, pri čemer se upoštevajo pričakovani prihranki stroškov ter prihodki iz nadomestne uporabe potovalnih storitev.
They should also have the right to terminate the package travel contract without paying any termination fee where unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances will significantly affect the performance of the package.
Prav tako bi morali imeti pravico do odstopa od pogodbe o paketnem potovanju brez plačila kakšne koli odstopnine, kadar bi neizogibne in izredne okoliščine znatno vplivale na izvedbo turističnega paketa.
This may cover for example warfare, other serious security problems such as terrorism, significant risks to human health such as the outbreak of a serious disease at the travel destination, or natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes or weather conditions which make it impossible to travel safely to the destination as agreed in the package travel contract.
To lahko zajema na primer vojne, druge resne varnostne težave, kot je terorizem, znatno tveganje za zdravje ljudi, kot je izbruh resne bolezni v kraju potovanja, ali naravne nesreče, kot so poplave, potresi ali vremenske razmere, ki onemogočajo varno potovanje v kraj, določen v pogodbi o paketnem potovanju.
In specific situations, the organiser should also be entitled to terminate the package travel contract before the start of the package without paying compensation, for instance if the minimum number of participants is not reached and where that possibility has been reserved in the contract.
Organizator bi moral imeti v določenih okoliščinah tudi pravico, da pred začetkom turističnega paketa odstopi od pogodbe o paketnem potovanju brez plačila nadomestila, na primer zaradi nezadostnega števila udeležencev, in kadar je bila ta možnost pridržana v pogodbi.
In that event, the organiser should refund all payments made in respect of the package.
Organizator bi moral v tem primeru povrniti vsa plačila za turistični paket.
In certain cases organisers should be allowed to make unilateral changes to the package travel contract.
Organizatorjem bi moralo biti v določenih primerih dovoljeno, da pogodbo o paketnem potovanju enostransko spremenijo.
However, travellers should have the right to terminate the package travel contract if the changes alter significantly any of the main characteristics of the travel services.
Toda če se zaradi sprememb katera koli od glavnih značilnosti potovalnih storitev znatno spremeni, bi morali imeti potniki pravico do odstopa od pogodbe o paketnem potovanju.
This may for instance be the case if the quality or the value of the travel services diminishes.
To se lahko na primer zgodi, če se zmanjšata kakovost ali vrednost potovalnih storitev.
Changes of departure or arrival times indicated in the package travel contract should be considered significant, for instance, where they would impose on the traveller considerable inconvenience or additional costs, for instance rearrangement of transport or accommodation.
Spremembe časa odhoda ali prihoda, navedenega v pogodbi o paketnem potovanju, bi bilo na primer treba šteti za znatne, kadar bi potniku povzročile velike nevšečnosti ali dodatne stroške, na primer spremembo prevoza ali nastanitve.
Price increases should be possible only if there has been a change in the cost of fuel or other power sources for the carriage of passengers, in taxes or fees imposed by a third party not directly involved in the performance of the travel services included in the package travel contract or in the exchange rates relevant to the package and only if the contract expressly reserves the possibility of such a price increase and states that the traveller is entitled to a price reduction corresponding to a decrease in those costs.
Povišanja cen bi morala biti mogoča le, če so se spremenili stroški goriva ali drugih virov energije za prevoz potnikov, davki ali pristojbine, ki jih nalagajo tretje strani, ki niso neposredno vključene v izvedbo potovalnih storitev, vključenih v pogodbo o paketnem potovanju, ali menjalni tečaji, povezani s turističnim paketom, ter le, če je v pogodbi izrecno pridržana možnost takšnega povišanja cene in je navedeno, da je potnik upravičen do znižanja cene, ki ustreza zmanjšanju teh stroškov.
If the organiser proposes a price increase of more than 8 % of the total price, the traveller should be entitled to terminate the package travel contract without paying a termination fee.
Če organizator predlaga povišanje cene za več kot 8 % celotne cene, bi potnik moral imeti pravico, da odstopi od pogodbe o paketnem potovanju brez plačila odstopnine.
It is appropriate to set out specific rules on remedies as regards the lack of conformity in the performance of the package travel contract.
Ustrezno je določiti posebna pravila o pravnih sredstvih pri neustrezni izvedbi pogodbe o paketnem potovanju.
The traveller should be entitled to have problems resolved and, where a significant proportion of travel services included in the package travel contract cannot be provided, the traveller should be offered suitable alternative arrangements.
Potnik bi moral imeti pravico zahtevati rešitev težav, kadar pa znatnega dela potovalnih storitev, ki jih vključuje pogodba o paketnem potovanju, ni mogoče zagotoviti, bi mu bilo treba ponuditi primerne nadomestne potovalne aranžmaje.
If the organiser does not remedy the lack of conformity within a reasonable period set by the traveller, the traveller should be able to do so himself and request reimbursement of the necessary expenses.
Če organizator ne odpravi neskladnosti v razumnem roku, ki ga določi potnik, bi moral potnik imeti možnost, da jih odpravi sam in zahteva povrnitev nastalih stroškov.
In certain cases there should not be a need to specify a time-limit, in particular if immediate remedy is required.
V določenih primerih ne bi bilo treba določiti roka, zlasti če je treba neskladnosti odpraviti takoj.
This would apply, for instance, when, due to the delay of a bus provided by the organiser, the traveller has to take a taxi to catch his flight on time.
To bi na primer veljalo, kadar mora potnik zaradi zamude avtobusa, ki ga je zagotovil organizator, vzeti taksi, da ujame svoj let.
Travellers should also be entitled to a price reduction, termination of the package travel contract and/or compensation for damages.
Potniki bi tudi morali biti upravičeni do znižanja cene, odstopa od pogodbe o paketnem potovanju in/ali nadomestila za škodo.
Compensation should also cover non-material damage, such as compensation for loss of enjoyment of the trip or holiday because of substantial problems in the performance of the relevant travel services.
Nadomestilo bi moralo zajemati tudi vso nematerialno škodo, kot je nadomestilo za pokvarjeno potovanje ali počitnice zaradi znatnih težav pri izvedbi zadevnih potovalnih storitev.
The traveller should be required to inform the organiser without undue delay, taking into account the circumstances of the case, of any lack of conformity he perceives during the performance of a travel service included in the package travel contract.
Potnik bi moral organizatorja brez nepotrebnega odlašanja – ob upoštevanju okoliščin primera – obvestiti o vseh neskladnostih, ki jih opazi med izvedbo potovalne storitve, ki je vključena v pogodbo o paketnem potovanju.
Failure to do so may be taken into account when determining the appropriate price reduction or compensation for damages where such notice would have avoided or reduced the damage.
Če tega ne stori, se to lahko upošteva pri določanju ustreznega znižanja cene ali nadomestila za škodo, kadar bi tako obvestilo lahko preprečilo ali zmanjšalo škodo.
In order to ensure consistency, it is appropriate to align the provisions of this Directive with international conventions regulating travel services and with the Union passenger rights legislation.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti je ustrezno določbe te direktive uskladiti z mednarodnimi konvencijami, ki urejajo potovalne storitve, in z zakonodajo Unije o pravicah potnikov.
Where the organiser is liable for failure to perform or improper performance of the travel services included in the package travel contract, the organiser should be able to invoke the limitations of the liability of service providers set out in such international conventions as the Montreal Convention of 1999 for the Unification of certain Rules for International Carriage by Air [6], the Convention of 1980 concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF) [7] and the Athens Convention of 1974 on the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea [8].
Kadar je organizator odgovoren za neizvedbo ali neustrezno izvedbo potovalnih storitev, vključenih v pogodbo o paketnem potovanju, bi bilo organizatorju treba omogočiti, da se sklicuje na omejitve odgovornosti ponudnikov storitev, določene v takih mednarodnih konvencijah, kot so Montrealska konvencija o poenotenju nekaterih pravil za mednarodni letalski prevoz iz leta 1999 [6], Konvencija o mednarodnem železniškem prometu (COTIF) iz leta 1980 [7] ter Atenska konvencija o prevozu potnikov in njihove prtljage po morju iz leta 1974 [8].
Where it is impossible to ensure the traveller's timely return to the place of departure because of unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances, the organiser should bear the cost of the travellers' necessary accommodation for a period not exceeding three nights per traveller, unless longer periods are provided for in existing or future Union passenger rights legislation.
Kadar zaradi neizogibnih in izrednih okoliščin pravočasne vrnitve potnika na kraj odhoda ni mogoče zagotoviti, bi moral organizator nositi stroške potrebne nastanitve potnika, vendar največ za obdobje, ki ne presega treh noči na potnika, razen če so v veljavni ali prihodnji zakonodaji Unije o pravicah potnikov določena daljša obdobja.
This Directive should not affect the rights of travellers to present claims both under this Directive and under other relevant Union legislation or international conventions, so that travellers continue to have the possibility to address claims to the organiser, the carrier or any other liable party, or, as the case may be, to more than one party.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati na pravice potnikov do vložitve zahtevkov na podlagi te direktive in druge zadevne zakonodaje Unije ali mednarodnih konvencij, tako da bodo imeli potniki še naprej možnost naslavljati zahtevke na organizatorja, prevoznika ali katero koli drugo odgovorno stranko ali – glede na okoliščine – več kot eno stranko.
It should be clarified that, in order to avoid overcompensation, compensation or price reduction granted under this Directive and the compensation or price reduction granted under other relevant Union legislation or international conventions should be deducted from each other.
Treba bi bilo pojasniti, da bi se moralo nadomestilo ali znižanje cene, odobreno na podlagi te direktive, in nadomestilo ali znižanje cen, odobreno na podlagi druge zadevne zakonodaje Unije ali mednarodnih konvencij, medsebojno odštevati, da se prepreči prekomerno izplačilo nadomestil.
The organiser's liability should be without prejudice to the right to seek redress from third parties, including service providers.
Odgovornost organizatorja ne bi smela posegati v pravico, da se zahteva nadomestilo od tretjih oseb, vključno s ponudniki storitev.
If the traveller is in difficulty during the trip or holiday, the organiser should be obliged to give appropriate assistance without undue delay.
Če je potnik med potovanjem ali počitnicami v težavah, bi mu moral organizator brez nepotrebnega odlašanja zagotoviti ustrezno pomoč.
Such assistance should consist mainly of providing, where appropriate, information on aspects such as health services, local authorities and consular assistance, as well as practical help, for instance with regard to distance communications and alternative travel arrangements.
Taka pomoč bi morala v glavnem zajemati, kadar je to ustrezno, informacije o vidikih, kot so zdravstvene storitve, lokalni organi in konzularna pomoč, ter praktično pomoč, na primer pri sredstvih komuniciranja na daljavo in nadomestnih potovalnih aranžmajih.
In its Communication of 18 March 2013 entitled ‘Passenger protection in the event of airline insolvency’, the Commission set out measures to improve the protection of travellers in the event of an airline insolvency, including better enforcement of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9] and of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, and engagement with industry stakeholders, failing which a legislative measure could be considered.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu z dne 18. marca 2013 z naslovom „Varstvo potnikov v primeru insolventnosti letalskega prevoznika“ določila ukrepe za izboljšanje varstva potnikov v primeru insolventnosti letalskega prevoznika, vključno z boljšim izvajanjem Uredbe (ES) št. 261/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9] in Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008, ter vključenost deležnikov v sektorju, v nasprotnem primeru pa bi se lahko ocenila potreba po zakonodajnem ukrepu.
That Communication concerns the purchase of an individual component, namely air travel services, and does not therefore address insolvency protection for packages and for linked travel arrangements.
To sporočilo se nanaša na nakup posamezne sestavine, in sicer storitev zračnega prevoza, ter tako ne obravnava varstva v primeru insolventnosti za turistične pakete in povezane potovalne aranžmaje.
Member States should ensure that travellers purchasing a package are fully protected against the organiser's insolvency.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da so potniki, ki kupijo turistični paket, v celoti zaščiteni proti insolventnosti organizatorja.
Member States in which organisers are established should ensure that they provide security for the refund of all payments made by or on behalf of travellers and, insofar as a package includes the carriage of passengers, for the traveller's repatriation in the event of the organiser's insolvency.
Države članice, v katerih imajo organizatorji sedež, bi morale zagotoviti, da organizatorji v primeru njihove insolventnosti jamčijo za povračilo vseh plačil, opravljenih s strani ali v imenu potnikov, in, v kolikor turistični paket vključuje prevoz potnikov, za povratek potnikov.
However, it should be possible to offer travellers the continuation of the package.
Kljub temu bi moralo biti mogoče, da se potnikom ponudi nadaljevanje turističnega paketa.
While retaining discretion as to the way in which insolvency protection is to be arranged, Member States should ensure that the protection is effective.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da je varstvo učinkovito, pri tem pa ohraniti diskrecijsko pravico glede ureditve varstva v primeru insolventnosti.
Effectiveness implies that the protection should become available as soon as, as a consequence of the organiser's liquidity problems, travel services are not being performed, will not be or will only partially be performed, or where service providers require travellers to pay for them.
Učinkovitost pomeni, da bi varstvo moralo biti na voljo, čim se – zaradi likvidnostnih težav organizatorja – potovalne storitve ne izvedejo, se ne bodo izvedle ali bodo le delno izvedene ali kadar ponudnik storitev od potnikov zahteva, da zanje plačajo.
Member States should be able to require that organisers provide travellers with a certificate documenting a direct entitlement against the provider of the insolvency protection.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti omogočeno, da zahtevajo, da organizatorji potnikom izdajo potrdilo, da lahko pri subjektu, ki zagotavlja varstvo v primeru insolventnosti, neposredno uveljavljajo svoj zahtevek.
For the insolvency protection to be effective, it should cover the foreseeable amounts of payments affected by the organiser's insolvency and, where applicable, the foreseeable cost for repatriations.
Da bi bilo varstvo v primeru insolventnosti učinkovito, bi moralo zajemati predvidljive zneske plačil, na katere vpliva insolventnost organizatorja, po potrebi pa tudi predvidljive stroške povratkov.
This means that the protection should be sufficient to cover all foreseeable payments made by or on behalf of travellers in respect of packages in peak season, taking into account the period between receiving such payments and the completion of the trip or holiday, as well as, where applicable, the foreseeable cost for repatriations.
To pomeni, da bi moralo varstvo zadoščati za kritje vseh predvidljivih plačil, opravljenih s strani ali v imenu potnikov za turistične pakete v sezoni največjega povpraševanja, ob upoštevanju obdobja med prejemom takih plačil in zaključkom potovanja ali počitnic, po potrebi pa tudi za kritje predvidljivih stroškov povratkov.