natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is mainly based on the fact that all financial indicators showed positive trends and that the Union industry was able to increase prices to a greater extent than its production cost, despite Bioking's dumped import prices, that were undercutting the Union industry prices.
To temelji predvsem na dejstvu, da so vsi finančni kazalniki kazali pozitivne trende in da je industrija Unije lahko zvišala cene v večjem obsegu, kot so se povečali njeni stroški proizvodnje, in to kljub dampinškim uvoznim cenam družbe Bioking, ki je nelojalno nižala cene industrije Unije.
On this basis, it was concluded that the Union industry did not suffer material injury.
Na podlagi tega je bilo sklenjeno, da industrija Unije ni utrpela znatne škode.
Comments from interested parties following disclosure
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani po razkritju
Interested parties claimed that the Commission incorrectly gave more weight to certain injury indicators (i.e. profitability) to the detriment of others that are of equal relevance.
Zainteresirane strani so trdile, da je Komisija napačno dajala več teže določenim kazalnikom škode (tj. dobičkonosnosti) na račun drugih, ki so ravno tako pomembni.
It was claimed that special care needed to be taken when performing the injury analysis of an industry entirely made up of SMEs, as is the case of the Union tartaric acid industry.
Trdili so, da je treba analizo škode za industrijo, ki jo sestavljajo izključno MSP, kot je to industrija vinske kisline Unije, izvesti še posebej pazljivo.
The Commission performed its injury analysis based on the information available, including the verified replies of the three sampled companies, which received specifically designed questionnaires intended for SMEs.
Komisija je analizo škode izvedla na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij, vključno s preverjenimi izpolnjenimi vprašalniki vseh treh vzorčenih družb, ki so prejele posebne vprašalnike, namenjene MSP.
In this context, it is stressed that the Commission made an assessment of all economic indicators having a bearing on the state of the Union industry, none of them being given prominence over the others, in line with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da je Komisija izvedla oceno vseh gospodarskih kazalnikov, ki so vplivali na stanje industrije Unije, ne da bi kateremu koli dala prednost pred drugimi, v skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
It was claimed that Bioking's 42,8 % dumping margin, being in excess of the residual duty of 34,9 % currently imposed on all Chinese producers, and of the individual duties of 13,1 % and 8,3 % applicable to two other companies, should have been interpreted to amount to significant injury, especially when corroborated with ever increasing import volumes and market shares.
Trdilo se je, da bi bilo treba stopnjo dampinga družbe Bioking v višini 42,8 %, ki presega preostalo dajatev v višini 34,9 %, ki trenutno velja za vse kitajske proizvajalce, in individualni dajatvi v višini 13,1 % in 8,3 %, ki se uporabljata za dve drugi družbi, razlagati kot znatno škodo, zlasti ob vedno večjem obsegu uvoza in tržnem deležu, ki to potrjujeta.
It was further claimed that Bioking enjoyed an ‘unjustified exemption’ from the scope of the anti-dumping measures currently in place under Implementing Regulation (EU) No 626/2012.
Nadalje se je trdilo, da je za Bioking veljalo „neupravičeno izvzetje“ iz obsega protidampinških ukrepov, ki se trenutno uporabljajo na podlagi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 626/2012.
The dumping margin of an exporting producer is not as such a conclusive economic indicator of injury.
Stopnja dampinga proizvajalca izvoznika sama po sebi ni ključen gospodarski kazalnik škode.
Indeed, the fact that imports are dumped does not necessarily imply that these imports will cause injury to the domestic industry.
Dejansko obstoj dampinškega uvoza ne pomeni nujno, da bo ta uvoz domači industriji povzročil škodo.
It merely represents a vehicle by which an exporting producer can achieve a higher market penetration (increase market share and import volumes).
Za proizvajalca izvoznika predstavlja le način, da z izdelkom bolj prodre na trg (tj. poveča tržni delež in obseg uvoza).
The Commission further noted that Bioking's imports into the Union have been excluded from the scope of the current measures by a legally valid Union act, Implementing Regulation (EU) No 332/2012.
Komisija je nadalje ugotovila, da je pravno veljaven akt Unije (Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 332/2012) uvoz družbe Bioking v Unijo izključil iz področja uporabe trenutnih ukrepov.
The same interested parties highlighted the fact that, while the Union industry saw its sales and market share in the Union decrease by 30 % and 21 % respectively, over the same time period Bioking was able to boost its dumped sales volumes by 25 % and its market share by 41 %, which is a clear indication of material injury.
Iste zainteresirane strani so opozorile, da je družba Bioking uspela povečati obseg svoje dampinške prodaje za 25 %, svoj tržni delež pa za 41 %, medtem ko sta se v istem obdobju prodaja in tržni delež Unije zmanjšala za 30 % oz. 21 %, kar očitno kaže na znatno škodo.
Indeed, the investigation showed an increase of volumes and market shares of imports made by Bioking.
Dejansko je preiskava pokazala povečan obseg in tržni delež uvoza družbe Bioking.
However the market share of the Union industry remained at a relatively high level in the period considered.
Kljub temu je tržni delež industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju ostal na relativno visoki ravni.
Nevertheless, market share and import volumes are not the only elements that have been analysed in order to establish whether the Union industry suffered material injury or not.
Vendar pa tržni delež in obseg uvoza nista edina elementa, ki sta bila analizirana, da bi se določilo, ali je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo ali ne.
As noted in recital 144 above, in line with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission made an assessment of all economic indicators having a bearing on the state of the Union industry, none of them being given prominence over the others.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 144, je Komisija v skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe izvedla oceno vseh gospodarskih kazalnikov, ki so vplivali na stanje industrije Unije, ne da bi kateremu koli dala prednost pred drugimi.
The argument was therefore rejected.
Trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
It was further claimed that the decline in production volume (16 % over the period considered) and in capacity utilisation (16 % over the period considered) would affect profitability and render the entire Union industry unsustainable in the long term, given its inability to cover the fixed costs, a development recognised by the Commission under recital 114.
Nadalje se je trdilo, da bosta zmanjšana obseg proizvodnje (16 % v obravnavanem obdobju) in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti (16 % v obravnavanem obdobju) vplivala na dobičkonosnost in na dolgi rok povzročila nevzdržnost celotne industrije Unije zaradi njene nesposobnosti, da bi pokrila stalne stroške, kar je razvoj, ki ga Komisija priznava v uvodni izjavi 114.
Interested parties also claimed that by means of a price policy that aggressively undercut Union industry's sales prices, Bioking was effectively leveraging its position as market leader, driving the Union industry out of key sectors, such as the building sector, the food additives sector or the emulsifier sector.
Zainteresirane strani so trdile tudi, da je družba Bioking s cenovno politiko, s katero je agresivno nelojalno nižala prodajne cene industrije Unije, dejansko utrdila svoj položaj vodilnega na trgu in izrinila industrijo Unije iz ključnih sektorjev, na primer sektorjev gradbeništva, živilskih dodatkov ali emulgatorjev.
They further argued that their refusal to engage in aggressive price competition with the dumped imports from Bioking and that their choice to sell a higher quality product to customers willing to pay a quality premium represented a legitimate defensive strategy.
Poleg tega so trdili, da sta njihova zavrnitev sodelovanja v agresivni cenovni konkurenci z dampinškim uvozom družbe Bioking in odločitev za prodajo kakovostnejšega izdelka strankam, ki so pripravljene plačati premijo za kakovost, predstavljali legitimno obrambno strategijo.
At the same time, these parties stressed that, given Bioking's overcapacity, this strategy could not be sustained in the long run since dumped Chinese imports are expected to flood the market at an increasing rate, suffocating the business opportunities of even the most profitable Union producer in the sample.
Hkrati so te strani poudarile, da glede na presežno zmogljivost družbe Bioking taka strategija ne more biti dolgo uspešna, saj se pričakuje, da bo kitajski dampinški uvoz vedno pogosteje preplavil trg in zadušil poslovne priložnosti tudi najbolj dobičkonosnim proizvajalcem Unije v vzorcu.
The investigation confirmed that Bioking increased its market share and undercut prices, which resulted in the reduction of the production volume and of the capacity utilisation rate as well as in the loss of important customers in certain industrial sectors by the Union industry.
Preiskava je potrdila, da je družba Bioking povečala svoj tržni delež in nelojalno nižala cene, zaradi česar sta se zmanjšala obseg proizvodnje in stopnja izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, poleg tega pa je zaradi tega industrija Unije v nekaterih industrijskih sektorjih izgubila pomembne stranke.
However, as acknowledged by the complainants themselves, this situation resulted from a rational business decision of the Union industry to choose to earn higher profit margins at the expense of market share.
Vendar so tudi pritožniki sami priznali, da je ta položaj posledica razumne poslovne odločitve industrije Unije, ki je izbrala višje stopnje dobička na račun tržnega deleža.
This cannot be construed as an indicator of material injury.
Tega ni mogoče razlagati kot kazalnika materialne škode.
The complainants also claimed that the profitability rate, as calculated by the Commission, concealed the real trends in the Union industry's actual profit levels, as not all sampled companies were able to post positive profit figures.
Pritožniki so trdili tudi, da stopnja dobičkonosnosti, kot jo je izračunala Komisija, prikriva dejanska gibanja dejanskih ravni dobička industrije Unije, saj vse vzorčene družbe niso mogle objaviti pozitivnih podatkov o dobičku.
These interested parties contested the methodology used by the Commission to calculate the profitability rate, claiming that the profitability levels established by the Commission for the purpose of performing the injury analysis were manifestly distorted by the presence of a relatively large Union producer in the sample, one that was able to achieve economies of scale, as opposed to the smaller sampled companies.
Te zainteresirane strani so nasprotovale metodologiji, ki jo je Komisija uporabila za izračun stopnje dobičkonosnosti, saj so po njihovem mnenju ravni dobičkonosnosti, ki jih je določila Komisija za namene analize škode, očitno izkrivljene zaradi prisotnosti relativno velikega proizvajalca Unije v vzorcu, ki je v nasprotju z manjšimi vzorčenimi družbami dosegel ekonomijo obsega.
It is noted that the situation of the Union industry is analysed in its entirety and therefore the micro-indicators related to the sampled Union producers are representative of the economic situation of the whole Union industry.
Poudarja se, da je bil položaj industrije Unije analiziran v celoti in da zato mikrokazalniki v zvezi z vzorčenimi proizvajalci Unije predstavljajo gospodarski položaj celotne industrije Unije.
The composition of the definitive sample has not been contested by the complainants, and as explained in recital 20 the sample is considered by the Commission to be representative of the situation of the Union industry.
Pritožniki niso nasprotovali sestavi končnega vzorca in Komisija meni, da je vzorec reprezentativen za položaj industrije Unije, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 20.
At the hearing held on 13 January 2016, the complainants reiterated their concerns with regard to the representativeness of the sample, without however substantiating them further.
Na zaslišanju dne 13. januarja 2016 so pritožniki ponovili svoje pomisleke glede reprezentativnosti vzorca, vendar utemeljitve niso nadgradili.
In any event, the sampled Union producers cannot be analysed in isolation, nor can any one company be given a different weight against other sampled companies in view of the fact that the entire Union industry is made up of SMEs (see recital 18 above).
V vsakem primeru se vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije ne morejo analizirati posamično, prav tako pa se ne more dati večje teže kateri koli izmed družb na račun drugih vzorčenih družb, saj celotno industrijo Unije sestavljajo MSP (glej uvodno izjavo 18).
It was also claimed that the Commission should have observed the fall in profitability since the end of the review investigation period in the last expiry review.
Trdilo se je tudi, da bi morala Komisija v zadnjem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa upoštevati padec dobičkonosnosti od konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
There was a dramatic fall in profitability between 2010 and 2011, which remained unaccounted for.
Med letoma 2010 in 2011 je prišlo do dramatičnega padca v dobičkonosnosti, za katerega še vedno ni razlage.
It is further underlined that it was precisely in 2011 that Bioking increased its market penetration by increasing its import volumes by around 33 %.
Nadalje se poudarja, da je ravno leta 2011 družba Bioking povečala svoj prodor na trg s povečanjem obsega uvoza za 33 %.
It is recalled that in order to examine the trends relevant for the assessment of injury, the Commission usually analyses a period of 3 years prior to the investigation period.
Treba je opozoriti, da Komisija za proučitev trendov, relevantnih za oceno škode, običajno analizira obdobje treh let pred obdobjem preiskave.
This period is fixed at the beginning of the investigation and is used to collect economic data which are subject to verification.
To obdobje se določi na začetku preiskave in se uporablja za zbiranje ekonomskih podatkov, ki se preverijo.
In this case, as explained in recital 28, the period selected by the Commission for the examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury starts on 1 January 2011 and ends on 30 September 2014, and the use of this period has never been contested by the complainants at any point in time during the investigation.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 28, je v tem primeru Komisija za proučitev trendov, relevantnih za oceno škode, izbrala obdobje, ki se začne 1. januarja 2011 in konča 30. septembra 2014, uporabi tega obdobja pa pritožniki med preiskavo niso nikoli nasprotovali.
The year 2010 falls therefore outside the temporal scope of this investigation, and using that year on a selective basis for some injury indicators selected by the complainants would be discriminatory and not objective.
Leto 2010 torej ne sodi v časovni okvir te preiskave, selektivna uporaba navedenega leta po izbiri pritožnikov za nekatere kazalnike škode pa bi bila diskriminatorna in neobjektivna.
In any event, the investigation could not establish a clear correlation between the trends in the profitability margins of the Union industry and the trends in the market share of Bioking over the period considered.
V vsakem primeru v preiskavi ni bilo mogoče vzpostaviti jasne povezave med trendi stopenj dobičkonosnosti industrije Unije in trendi v tržnem deležu družbe Bioking v obravnavanem obdobju.
Finally, the Commission notes that the sampled companies did not have restructuring costs.
Nazadnje Komisija poudarja, da vzorčene družbe niso imele stroškov prestrukturiranja.
It was argued that the Union industry's ability to invest in the future is at stake, since the decreasing production volumes and capacity utilisation rates will translate in the Union industry's inability to cover its fixed costs in the long term.
Trdilo se je, da je ogrožena sposobnost industrije Unije za naložbe v prihodnost, saj industrija Unije zaradi manjšega obsega proizvodnje in stopenj izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti dolgoročno ne bo mogla kriti svojih stalnih stroškov.
The current profitability levels are therefore bound to collapse.
Zato se bodo sedanje ravni dobičkonosnosti najverjetneje znižale.
The investigation showed that the Union industry made investments during the period considered.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je industrija Unije v obravnavanem obdobju izvedla naložbe.
Even if the level of investments has decreased by an overall 7 % during the period considered, this should be seen in relation with the production process of tartaric acid, which is rather basic and does not necessarily require significant investments in research and development.
Čeprav se je raven naložb v obravnavanem obdobju na splošno zmanjšala za 7 %, bi bilo to treba obravnavati v povezavi s postopkom proizvodnje vinske kisline, ki je precej osnoven in ne zahteva nujno znatnih naložb v raziskave in razvoj.
It was also claimed that the increase in cash-flow should have been analysed starting from 2010 instead of 2011, as the latter showed cash flow at a very low level.
Trdilo se je tudi, da bi bilo treba povečanje denarnega toka analizirati z začetkom leta 2010 in ne leta 2011, saj je za slednje značilen denarni tok na zelo nizki ravni.
According to the interested parties, if the Commission had looked at 2010 as a starting point, it would have noted that the Union industry had a surplus cash-flow of EUR 6,8 million.
Zainteresirane strani trdijo, da bi Komisija, če bi kot izhodišče obravnavala leto 2010, ugotovila, da je imela industrija Unije 6,8 milijonov EUR presežka denarnega toka.
Moreover, it was claimed that cash flow deteriorated significantly between 2013 and the investigation period falling by 43 % over a short period of time.
Poleg tega se je trdilo, da se je denarni tok med letom 2013 in obdobjem preiskave bistveno zmanjšal in v kratkem obdobju padel za 43 %.
The Commission should also have examined more closely the distortive effect of the strongest sampled company, especially in the light of the fact that for two of the sampled companies, cash-flow remained at critical levels between 2012 and the investigation period.
Komisija bi morala tudi bolj podrobno proučiti izkrivljajoč učinek najmočnejše vzorčene družbe, zlasti glede na to, da je denarni tok dveh vzorčenih družb med letom 2012 in obdobjem preiskave ostal na kritičnih ravneh.
As explained above in recital 154, the situation of the Union industry is normally assessed over a period of 3 years prior to the investigation period, and the year 2010 is not part of the temporal scope of this investigation.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 154, se položaj industrije Unije običajno oceni v obdobju treh let pred obdobjem preiskave in leto 2010 ni del časovnega okvira te preiskave.
The investigation showed that the profit margins achieved by the Union industry were sufficient to generate cash flow over the period considered.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je industrija Unije v obravnavanem obdobju dosegla zadostne stopnje dobička za ustvarjanje denarnega toka.
The cash flow was at its highest level in 2012 and 2013 and overall increased significantly over the period considered.
Denarni tok je bil na najvišji ravni v letih 2012 in 2013 ter se je na splošno v obravnavanem obdobju bistveno povečal.
It was claimed that the trend in cash-flow and return on investment diverged from the profitability trend, showing the importance of sales volume in the assessment of profitability and the overall well-being of an industry.
Trdilo se je, da sta se trend denarnega toka in donosnost naložb razlikovali od trenda dobičkonosnosti, kar kaže na pomembnost obsega prodaje pri oceni dobičkonosnosti in splošnem dobrem stanju v industriji.
It was claimed that the Commission incorrectly stated that all financial indicators showed positive trends, since investment levels suffered a sharp decrease between 2011 and 2013 (24 %) and an overall decline of 7 % over the period considered.
Trdilo se je, da je Komisija napačno navedla, da so vsi finančni kazalniki kazali pozitiven trend, saj so ravni naložb med letoma 2011 in 2013 močno upadle (24 %), v obravnavanem obdobju pa so se na splošno znižale za 7 %.
Profitability, cash flow and return on investments are different economic indicators and may not necessarily follow the same trends.
Dobičkonosnost, denarni tok in donosnost naložb so različni gospodarski kazalniki in ne sledijo nujno istim trendom.
In any event, these three indicators, even if showing different trends, all showed an overall significant increase during the period considered which is a strong indicator of the lack of injury of the Union industry in the investigation period.
V vsakem primeru so vsi ti trije kazalniki v obravnavanem obdobju kljub različnim posamičnim trendom kazali bistveno splošno povečanje, kar je močan pokazatelj neobstoja škode za industrijo Unije v obdobju preiskave.
Interested parties stressed the fact that the conclusion as to the Union industry's recovery from past dumping contradicted the conclusion of the last expiry review, where the Commission described the Union industry to be still in a vulnerable situation.
Zainteresirane strani so poudarile dejstvo, da je bil sklep o okrevanju industrije Unije od preteklega dampinga v nasprotju s sklepom zadnjega pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, v katerem je Komisija položaj industrije Unije označila za še vedno ranljiv.
It was claimed that most of the indicators used in the expiry review to demonstrate the fragility of the Union industry suffered further deterioration over the course of the period considered.
Trdilo se je, da se je večina kazalnikov, ki so bili v pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa uporabljeni za dokazovanje ranljivosti industrije Unije, v obravnavanem obdobju le še nadalje poslabšala.
They also contested the Commission's approach, according to which any recovery from past dumping is only relevant to the extent that it refers to the dumping practices of other Chinese exporting producers, against which measures were extended and amended by way of several reviews.
Prav tako se niso strinjali s pristopom Komisije, po katerem je kakršno koli okrevanje od preteklega dampinga relevantno samo, v kolikor se nanaša na dampinške prakse drugih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, proti katerim so bili ukrepi podaljšani in spremenjeni z več pregledi.
It was claimed that there was no legal basis in the basic Regulation that would enable the Commission to operate such distinctions.
Trdilo se je, da v osnovni uredbi ni nobene pravne podlage, ki bi Komisiji omogočala uporabo takega razlikovanja.
The fact that the situation of the Union industry was still considered as vulnerable in the previous expiry review has no impact on the conclusion of the current investigation.
Dejstvo, da je bil v predhodnem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa položaj industrije Unije še vedno označen kot ranljiv, nima nobenega vpliva na sklep sedanje preiskave.
Indeed, as confirmed by the investigation, the financial situation of the Union industry continued to improve over the period considered leading to high profitability levels in 2012, 2013 and the investigation period.
Dejansko je preiskava potrdila, da se je finančni položaj industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju še naprej izboljševal in vodil k visokim stopnjam dobičkonosnosti v letih 2012 in 2013 ter v obdobju preiskave.
In addition, the Commission confirms the approach described in recital 123 regarding the analysis of the recovery from past dumping.
Poleg tega Komisija potrjuje pristop, opisan v uvodni izjavi 123, v zvezi z analizo okrevanja od preteklega dampinga.
In any event, this factor would not affect the overall conclusion of the Commission on the lack of material injury in the specific circumstances of this case.
V vsakem primeru ta dejavnik ne bil vplival na splošen sklep Komisije, da v posebnih okoliščinah tega primera ni prišlo do znatne škode.
With regard to the Union industry's employment levels, interested parties requested the Commission to double-check employment data.
V zvezi z ravnjo zaposlenosti v industriji Unije so zainteresirane strani Komisijo prosile, naj ponovno preveri podatke o zaposlenosti.