natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘Milk or dairy products complying with Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/645 of 22 April 2016 concerning certain protective measures against lumpy skin disease in Bulgaria.’.
„Mleko ali mlečni izdelki v skladu z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije (EU) 2016/645 z dne 22. aprila 2016 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih proti vozličastemu dermatitisu v Bolgariji.“
Special marking of fresh meat, meat preparations and meat products referred to in Articles 5(1) and 6(2) respectively
Posebna oznaka za sveže meso, mesne pripravke in mesne izdelke iz člena 5(1) oziroma člena 6(2)
Bulgaria shall ensure that the fresh meat, meat preparations and meat products referred to in Article 5(1) and Article 6(2) are marked with a special health mark or identification mark that is not oval and cannot be confused with:
Bolgarija zagotovi, da so sveže meso, mesni pripravki in mesni izdelki iz členov 5(1) in 6(2) označeni s posebno oznako zdravstvene ustreznosti ali identifikacijsko oznako, ki ne sme biti ovalna in je ni mogoče zamenjati z:
the health mark for fresh meat as set out in Chapter III of Section I of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 854/2004;
oznako zdravstvene ustreznosti za sveže meso, kot je določena v poglavju III oddelka I Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 854/2004;
the identification mark for meat preparations and meat products consisting of, or containing meat of bovine animals, as set out in Section I of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004.
identifikacijsko oznako za mesne pripravke in mesne izdelke, ki so sestavljeni iz govejega mesa ali ga vsebujejo, kot je določena v oddelku I Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004.
Requirements concerning transport vehicles, cleansing and disinfection
Zahteve glede prevoznih sredstev, čiščenja in razkuževanja
The competent authority shall ensure that, for any vehicle which has been in contact with animals of susceptible species in the restricted zone and intends to leave this same zone, the operator or driver of this vehicle provides evidence showing that, since the last contact with those animals, the vehicle has been cleansed and disinfected in a manner to inactivate the lumpy skin disease virus.
Pristojni organ zagotovi, da za vsako vozilo, ki je bilo v stiku z živalmi dovzetnih vrst na območju z omejitvami in namerava zapustiti to območje, upravljavec ali voznik vozila dokaže, da je bilo od zadnjega stika z navedenimi živalmi vozilo očiščeno in razkuženo na način, ki bi inaktiviral virus vozličastega dermatitisa.
The competent authority shall specify the information to be submitted by the operator or driver of the livestock vehicle in order to demonstrate the required cleansing and disinfection has taken place.
Pristojni organ opredeli, katere informacije mora predložiti upravljavec ali voznik vozila za prevoz rejnih živali, da se dokaže, da je bilo opravljeno zahtevano čiščenje in razkuževanje.
Information requirements
Zahteve po informacijah
Bulgaria shall inform the Commission and the other Member States, within the framework of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed, of the results of the surveillance for lumpy skin disease carried out in the restricted zone.
Bolgarija v okviru Stalnega odbora za rastline, živali, hrano in krmo Komisijo in druge države članice obvesti o rezultatih nadzora vozličastega dermatitisa, izvedenega na območju z omejitvami.
Done at Brussels, 22 April 2016.
V Bruslju, 22. aprila 2016
OJ L 18, 23.1.2003, p. 11.
UL L 18, 23.1.2003, str. 11.
Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine (OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977/64).
Direktiva Sveta 64/432/EGS z dne 26. junija 1964 o problemih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki vplivajo na trgovino z govedom in prašiči znotraj Skupnosti (UL 121, 29.7.1964, str.
Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992 laying down animal health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of animals, semen, ova and embryos not subject to animal health requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 90/425/EEC (OJ L 268, 14.9.1992, p. 54).
1977/64).
EFSA Journal 2015;13(1):3986 [73 pp.].
Direktiva Sveta 92/65/EGS z dne 13. julija 1992 o zahtevah zdravstvenega varstva živali za trgovino in za uvoz v Skupnost živali, semena, jajčnih celic in zarodkov, za katere ne veljajo zahteve zdravstvenega varstva živali, določene v posebnih pravilih Skupnosti iz Priloge A(I) k Direktivi 90/425/EGS (UL L 268, 14.9.1992, str.
24th Edition, 2015.
54).
Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin (OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 55).
EFSA Journal 2015;13(1):3986 [73 str.].
Commission Decision 2007/777/EC of 29 November 2007 laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of certain meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines for human consumption from third countries and repealing Decision 2005/432/EC (OJ L 312, 30.11.2007, p. 49).
izdaja, 2015.
EFSA Journal (2006) 347, p. 1.
Uredba (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o posebnih higienskih pravilih za živila živalskega izvora (UL L 139, 30.4.2004, str.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 of 25 February 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as regards certain samples and items exempt from veterinary checks at the border under that Directive (OJ L 54, 26.2.2011, p. 1).
55).
Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation) (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 1).
Odločba Komisije 2007/777/ES z dne 29. novembra 2007 o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali in javnozdravstvenim varstvom ter vzorcih spričeval za uvoz iz tretjih držav nekaterih mesnih izdelkov in obdelanih želodcev, mehurjev in črev za prehrano ljudi in o razveljavitvi Odločbe 2005/432/ES (UL L 312, 30.11.2007, str. 49).
Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption (OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 206).
EFSA Journal (2006) 347, str. 1.
Council Directive 2003/85/EC of 29 September 2003 on Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease repealing Directive 85/511/EEC and Decisions 89/531/EEC and 91/665/EEC and amending Directive 92/46/EEC (OJ L 306, 22.11.2003, p. 1).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 142/2011 z dne 25. februarja 2011 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1069/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi zdravstvenih pravil za živalske stranske proizvode in pridobljene proizvode, ki niso namenjeni prehrani ljudi, ter o izvajanju Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES glede nekaterih vzorcev in predmetov, ki so izvzeti iz veterinarskih pregledov na meji v skladu z navedeno direktivo (UL L 54, 26.2.2011, str.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 599/2004 of 30 March 2004 concerning the adoption of a harmonised model certificate and inspection report linked to intra-Community trade in animals and products of animal origin (OJ L 94, 31.3.2004, p. 44).
1).
ANNEX
Uredba (ES) št. 1069/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o določitvi zdravstvenih pravil za živalske stranske proizvode in pridobljene proizvode, ki niso namenjeni prehrani ljudi, ter razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1774/2002 (Uredba o živalskih stranskih proizvodih) (UL L 300, 14.11.2009, str.
RESTRICTED ZONE REFERRED TO IN POINT (b) OF THE SECOND SUBPARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 2
1).
The following regions in Bulgaria:
Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 854/2004 z dne 29. aprila 2004 o določitvi posebnih predpisov za organizacijo uradnega nadzora proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi (UL L 139, 30.4.2004, str.
Haskovo Region
206).
Stara Zagora Region
Direktiva Sveta 2003/85/ES z dne 29. septembra 2003 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje slinavke in parkljevke, ki razveljavljajo Direktivo 85/511/EGS in odločbi 89/531/EGS in 91/665/EGS ter spreminja Direktivo 92/46/EGS (UL L 306, 22.11.2003, str. 1).
Commission Decision (EU) 2016/649
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/649
on the measure SA.24123 (12/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by the Netherlands — Alleged sale of land below market price by the Municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg
o ukrepu SA.24123 (12/C) (ex 11/NN), ki ga je izvedla Nizozemska – Domnevna prodaja zemljišča pod tržno ceno s strani občine Leidschendam-Voorburg
(notified under document C(2016) 85)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2016) 85)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenima določbama [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter of 10 September 2007, the Stichting Behoud Damplein Leidschendam (hereinafter ‘the Stichting’), a foundation set up in 2006 to defend the interests of residents located in the vicinity of the Damplein in Leidschendam (Municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg, the Netherlands), submitted a complaint to the Commission concerning the alleged grant of State aid in the context of a real estate project initiated by the Municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg in cooperation with a number of private parties.
Z dopisom z dne 10. septembra 2007 je Stichting Behoud Damplein Leidschendam (v nadaljnjem besedilu: fundacija), ki je bila leta 2006 ustanovljena za zaščito interesov prebivalcev okolice Dampleina v občini Leidschendam (občina Leidschendam-Voorburg, Nizozemska), pri Komisiji vložila pritožbo zaradi domnevne dodelitve državne pomoči v okviru nepremičninskega projekta, ki ga je začela izvajati občina Leidschendam-Voorburg v sodelovanju s številnimi zasebnimi subjekti.
The Commission sent further requests for information to the Dutch authorities by letters of 25 April 2008, 12 September 2008, 14 August 2009, 12 February 2010 and 2 August 2011.
Sklep Komisije o začetku postopka (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka) je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
The Dutch authorities replied to these requests by letters of 30 May 2008, 7 November 2008, 30 October 2009, 12 April 2010, 29 September 2011 and 3 October 2011, respectively.
Komisija je s tem sklepom o začetku postopka pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo pripombe glede njene predhodne ocene ukrepa.
On 12 March 2010, a meeting took place between the Commission departments and the Dutch authorities and, as a result, additional information was submitted to the Commission by letter of 30 August 2010.
Z dopisom z dne 18. aprila 2012 so nizozemski organi po dveh podaljšanjih roka za predložitev pripomb in po sestanku s službami Komisije z dne 12. marca 2012, na katerem je bil navzoč upravičenec ukrepa, predložili pripombe glede sklepa o začetku postopka.
By letter of 26 January 2012, the Commission informed the Netherlands that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter: ‘TFEU’) in respect of a specific measure taken in the context of the real estate project.
Z dopisom z dne 16. aprila 2012 je fundacija predložila Komisiji pripombe glede sklepa o začetku postopka.
The Commission's decision to initiate the procedure (hereinafter ‘the opening decision’) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Komisija je 23. januarja 2013 sprejela končni sklep, v katerem je sklenila, da sporni nepremičninski projekt vsebuje pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU.
By letter of 18 April 2012, the Dutch authorities submitted their observations on the opening decision, after having received two extensions of the deadline to comment and after a meeting with the Commission departments on 12 March 2012 in the presence of the beneficiary of the measure.
Splošno sodišče ga je v sodbi z dne 30. junija 2015 razveljavilo [3].
By letter of 16 April 2012, the Stichting submitted its comments to the Commission on the opening decision.
Zato je morala Komisija znova preučiti ukrep in sprejeti nov sklep o spornem nepremičninskem projektu.
The non-confidential version of these comments was forwarded to the Dutch authorities by letter of 16 May 2012.
OPIS UKREPOV
By letter of 14 June 2012, the Dutch authorities submitted their reaction to the Stichting's comments.
SODELUJOČE STRANI
On 23 January 2013 the Commission adopted a final decision, concluding that the contested real estate project contained aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Občina Leidschendam-Voorburg (v nadaljnjem besedilu: občina) se nahaja v nizozemski provinci Južna Holandija blizu mesta Haag.
The decision of 23 January 2013 was appealed against by the Netherlands, the Municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg and the beneficiary Schouten & de Jong Projectontwikkeling BV.
Partnerstvo Schouten-de Jong Bouwfonds (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SJB), ki sta ga družba Schouten & De Jong Projectontwikkeling BV (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Schouten de Jong) in družba Bouwfonds Ontwikkeling BV (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Bouwfonds) ustanovili za namene spornega nepremičninskega projekta, po nizozemski zakonodaji ni pravna oseba [4].
In its judgment of 30 June 2015 the General Court annulled the decision [3].
Družba Schouten de Jong s sedežem v Voorburgu na Nizozemskem je dejavna na področju razvoja nepremičninskih projektov na Nizozemskem, zlasti na območju Leidschendama.
Consequently, the Commission had to re-examine the measure and take a new decision on the contested real estate project.
Njeni prihodki od prodaje so leta 2011 znašali 60 milijonov EUR.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURES
Družba Bouwfonds, podružnica družbe Rabo Vastgoed s sedežem v Delftu na Nizozemskem, je največja razvijalka nepremičnin na Nizozemskem ter se uvršča med tri največje akterje na evropskem nepremičninskem trgu.
THE PARTIES INVOLVED
Dejavna je zlasti na Nizozemskem, v Nemčiji in Franciji.
The Municipality of Leidschendam-Voorburg (hereinafter: ‘the Municipality’) is located in the province of South Holland, close to The Hague, in the Netherlands.
Njeni prihodki od prodaje so leta 2011 znašali 1,6 milijarde EUR.
Schouten-de Jong Bouwfonds (hereinafter ‘SJB’) is a partnership set up by Schouten & De Jong Projectontwikkeling BV (hereinafter ‘Schouten de Jong’) and Bouwfonds Ontwikkeling BV (hereinafter ‘Bouwfonds’) for the purposes of the contested real estate project and does not have legal personality under Dutch law [4].
Javno-zasebno partnerstvo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: JZP) v obliki vennootschap onder firma sta občina in partnerstvo SJB ustanovila za izvajanje faze uporabe stavbnega zemljišča v spornem nepremičninskem projektu.
Schouten de Jong, established in Voorburg, the Netherlands, is active in real estate project development in the Netherlands, in particular in the Leidschendam area.
Vsaka stran v javno-zasebnem partnerstvu naj bi nosila 50 % stroškov in tveganj, povezanih s fazo uporabe stavbnega zemljišča v projektu.
Its turnover amounted to EUR 60 million in 2011.
Sprejemanje odločitev v javno-zasebnem partnerstvu naj bi bilo soglasno.
Bouwfonds, established in Delft, the Netherlands, and a subsidiary of Rabo Vastgoed, is the largest real estate developer in the Netherlands and among the top three largest players on the European real estate market.
Po informacijah, ki so jih predložili nizozemski organi, sta družbi Schouten de Jong in Bouwfonds solidarno odgovorni (hoofdelijk aansprakelijk) za to, da partnerstvo SJB izpolnjuje obveznosti iz sporazuma o javno-zasebnem partnerstvu [5].
Bouwfonds is active, in particular, in the Netherlands, Germany and France.
NEPREMIČNINSKI PROJEKT
It had a turnover of EUR 1,6 billion in 2011.
Občinski svet je 6. aprila 2004 sprejel Koncept glavnega načrta o uporabi stavbnega zemljišča Damcentrum in Koncept glavnega načrta Damcentrum, ki sestavljata okvirni sporazum za oživitev mestnega središča Leidschendama (v nadaljnjem besedilu: projekt Mestno središče Leidschendama [6]).
A public-private partnership in the form of a vennootschap onder firma (hereinafter: ‘the PPP’) was set-up by the Municipality and SJB to undertake the ground exploitation phase of the contested real estate project.
Projekt Mestno središče Leidschendama, ki zadeva približno 20,7 hektarja površine, zajema rušenje okoli 280 večinoma neprofitnih stanovanjskih enot, obnovo javnih površin in infrastrukture (kanalizacija, tlakovanje, razsvetljava itd.), gradnjo približno 600 novih stanovanjskih enot (v neprofitnem in profitnem stanovanjskem sektorju), približno 3000 kvadratnih metrov poslovnih (nakupovalnih) prostorov in dvoetažne podzemne parkirne hiše ter preselitev in gradnjo nove šole.
Each party to the PPP was to bear 50 % of the costs and the risks associated with the ground exploitation phase of the project.
Projekt Mestno središče Leidschendama je bil razdeljen na različne podprojekte in eden od njih je nepremičninski projekt, ki se nanaša na Damplein (v nadaljnjem besedilu: projekt Damplein).
The decision-making of the PPP was to be by unanimity.
Faza gradnje
According to the information provided by the Dutch authorities, Schouten de Jong and Bouwfonds are each jointly and severally liable (hoofdelijk aansprakelijk) for the fulfilment by SJB of its obligations under the PPP agreement [5].
Na podlagi projekta Mestno središče Leidschendama je občina 9. septembra 2004 sklenila sporazum o sodelovanju (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporazum o sodelovanju iz leta 2004) z več zasebnimi razvijalci projektov, vključno s partnerstvom SJB.
THE REAL ESTATE PROJECT
V sporazumu o sodelovanju iz leta 2004 je določeno, da bodo zasebni razvijalci projektov za vsakega od posebnih sestavnih delov projekta Mestno središče Leidschendama, ki jim je dodeljen, na svoje stroške in na lastno tveganje zgradili in prodali predvideno nepremičnino.
On 6 April 2004, the Council of the Municipality adopted a Concept Ground Exploitation Masterplan Damcentrum and a Concept Masterplan Damcentrum laying down a framework agreement aimed at revitalising Leidschendam's city centre (hereinafter: ‘the Leidschendam Centrum Project’) [6].
V skladu s sporazumom o sodelovanju iz leta 2004 bi se gradbena dela lahko začela, takoj ko bi bilo zemljišče pripravljeno za gradnjo (glej uvodno izjavo 23) in bi bila pridobljena ustrezna gradbena dovoljenja.
The Leidschendam Centrum Project concerns an area of approximately 20,7 hectares and consists of demolishing approximately 280 mainly social housing units, renewing public spaces and utilities (sewerage, paving, lighting, etc.) and constructing approximately 600 new housing units — both social housing and free sector housing — as well as approximately 3000 square metres of commercial (shopping) space, a two-level underground parking garage, and the relocation and rebuilding of a school.
Vendar je bilo zasebnim razvijalcem dovoljeno, da preložijo gradnjo stanovanjskih enot v profitnem sektorju, dokler 70 % teh enot, v kombinaciji z neprofitnimi stanovanjskimi enotami ali brez teh, na območju zadevnega podprojekta ne bi bilo že vnaprej prodanih (člen 7(5) sporazuma o sodelovanju iz leta 2004, v nadaljnjem besedilu: klavzula o 70 %).
The Leidschendam Centrum Project was divided into various sub-projects, one of which is the real estate project concerning the Damplein (hereinafter: ‘the Damplein Project’).
Klavzula o70 % je v gradbenih pogodbah na Nizozemskem običajna, zmanjšala pa naj bi tveganja razvijalcev projektov, da zgradijo nepremičnino, ki morda ne bo prodana.
The construction phase
Vendar v navedenem sporazumu ni bilo predvidenih možnosti za odlog gradnje poslovnih prostorov in podzemne parkirne hiše.
On the basis of the Leidschendam Centrum Project, the Municipality concluded a cooperation agreement with a number of private project developers, including with SJB, on 9 September 2004 (hereinafter: ‘the 2004 Cooperation Agreement’).
V skladu s sporazumom o sodelovanju iz leta 2004 in dodatnim sporazumom o projektu, ki je bil sklenjen 22. novembra 2004 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporazum o projektu s partnerstvom SJB), naj bi partnerstvo SJB zgradilo skupno 242 stanovanjskih enot, od katerih bi jih bilo po prvotnem načrtu 74 zgrajenih na Dampleinu [7].
The 2004 Cooperation Agreement stipulates that the private project developers would, for each of the specific sub-parts of the Leidschendam Centrum Project assigned to them, construct and sell, at their own risk and expense, the envisaged real estate.
Partnerstvo SJB naj bi na Dampleinu zgradilo tudi približno 2400 kvadratnih metrov poslovnih prostorov in podzemno parkirno hišo, ki bi poleg zasebnega dela (75 parkirnih mest) vključevala tudi javni del (225 parkirnih mest).
According to the 2004 Cooperation Agreement, the construction works would begin once the land had been made ready for construction (see recital 23 below) and the necessary building permits had been obtained.
Poslovni prostori in stanovanjske enote naj bi bili zgrajeni nad podzemno parkirno hišo.
However, as regards the construction of the free sector housing units, the private developers were allowed to postpone construction until 70 % of these units, whether or not in combination with social housing units, in the sub-project area concerned had been pre-sold (Article 7.5 of the 2004 Cooperation Agreement, hereinafter: ‘the 70 % clause’).
Kot so v dopisih izrecno poudarili tudi nizozemski organi, občina ni sodelovala pri gradbeni fazi projekta in ni nosila tveganj, povezanih s prodajo stanovanjskih enot in poslovnih prostorov.
This 70 % clause is commonly found in construction contracts in the Netherlands and seeks to limit the risks for project developers of constructing real estate which might not be sold.
Morebitni dobiček od prodaje bi se stekal neposredno k zasebnim razvijalcem.
The agreement did not, however, provide for any possibility to postpone construction as regards the commercial premises and the underground parking garage.
Ločevati bi bilo treba med fazo gradnje in tako imenovano fazo uporabe stavbnega zemljišča, v kateri je občina prek javno-zasebnega partnerstva sodelovala s partnerstvom SJB in nosila 50 % tveganj (glej uvodno izjavo 19).
According to both the 2004 Cooperation Agreement and a further project agreement concluded on 22 November 2004 (hereinafter: the ‘SJB Project Agreement’), SJB would build a total of 242 housing units, of which 74 were initially planned to be built on the Damplein [7].
Faza uporabe stavbnega zemljišča
SJB would also build approximately 2400 square metres of commercial space on the Damplein and construct the underground parking garage, which apart from a private section (75 parking spaces) also included a public section (225 parking spaces).
Preden so se lahko začela gradbena dela na vsakem posameznem delu nepremičninskega projekta, je bilo treba pridobiti zemljišče, preurediti javno infrastrukturo in pripraviti zemljišče za gradnjo.
The commercial premises and the housing units would be built on top of the underground parking garage.
Ker naj bi „faza uporabe stavbnega zemljišča“ predvidoma vključevala visoke stroške (takrat ocenjene na približno 30 milijonov EUR) in znatna tveganja, se je občina odločila, da bo za izvedbo teh del s partnerstvom SJB ustanovila javno-zasebno partnerstvo [8].
The Municipality, as also explicitly emphasised by the Dutch authorities in their submissions, was not involved in the construction phase of the project and bore no risks in relation to the sale of the housing units and commercial premises.
Občina je zato s partnerstvom SJB 22. novembra 2004 podpisala sporazum o uporabi stavbnega zemljišča/javno-zasebnem partnerstvu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporazum GREX).