natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission also identified that ZNSHINE provided in its quarterly reports misleading information concerning the date of a significant number of commercial invoices during a substantial period of time.
Poleg tega je Komisija ugotovila, da je družba ZNSHINE v svojih četrtletnih poročilih predložila zavajajoče informacije v zvezi z datumom znatnega števila trgovinskih računov v daljšem časovnem obdobju.
The correct invoice date is essential for establishing whether MIP is respected since it is subject to a periodic adaptation mechanism.
Pravilni datum računa je bistvenega pomena za določitev, ali se spoštuje MIP, saj se mehanizem redno prilagaja.
Based on the information submitted by ZNSHINE, the Commission established that the commercial invoice presented for customs clearance to the Union in the above cases was issued on a different date than the one used to obtain the export undertaking certificate from the CCCME.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila družba ZNSHINE, je Komisija ugotovila, da je bil trgovinski račun, predložen za carinjenje v Unijo v zgoraj navedenih primerih, izdan na datume, ki so se razlikovali od datumov, uporabljenih za pridobitev potrdila o izvozni zavezi, ki ga izda CCCME.
There was a considerable time lapse between the dates of the respective invoices.
Časovni zamik med datumi zadevnih računov je znaten.
ZNSHINE claimed that the difference between the invoice dates was due to a technical error made by inexperienced personnel.
Družba ZNSHINE je trdila, da je razlika med datumi na računih posledica tehnične napake neizkušenega osebja.
The Commission cannot accept such a justification.
Komisija take utemeljitve ne more sprejeti.
The Commission analysed the implication of this inconsistency in ZNSHINE's quarterly reports and concluded that ZNSHINE breached the reporting obligation under the undertaking.
Komisija je analizirala posledice te nedoslednosti v četrtletnih poročilih družbe ZNSHINE in ugotovila, da je družba kršila obveznost poročanja na podlagi zaveze.
E. ASSESSMENT OF PRACTICABILITY OF THE OVERALL UNDERTAKING
E. OCENA IZVEDLJIVOSTI CELOTNE ZAVEZE
The undertaking stipulates that a breach by an individual exporting producer does not automatically lead to the withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers.
Zaveza določa, da kršitev s strani posameznega proizvajalca izvoznika ne privede samodejno do umika sprejetja zaveze za vse proizvajalce izvoznike.
In such a case, the Commission shall assess the impact of that particular breach on the practicability of the undertaking with the effect for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
V takem primeru Komisija oceni vpliv te kršitve na izvedljivost zaveze z učinkom za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
The Commission has accordingly assessed the impact of the breaches by ZNSHINE on the practicability of the undertaking with the effect for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
Komisija je ustrezno ocenila vpliv kršitev s strani družbe ZNSHINE na izvedljivost zaveze z učinkom za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
The responsibility for the breaches lies alone with the exporting producer in question; the monitoring has not revealed any systematic breaches by a major number of exporting producers or the CCCME.
Odgovornost za kršitve se pripiše samo zadevnemu proizvajalcu izvozniku.
The Commission therefore concludes that the overall functioning of the undertaking is not affected and that there are no grounds for withdrawal of the acceptance of the undertaking for all exporting producers and the CCCME.
S spremljanjem niso bile razkrite nobene sistematične kršitve s strani velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali CCCME.
F. WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS AND HEARINGS
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da delovanje v skladu z zavezo na splošno ni ogroženo in da ni razlogov za umik sprejetja zaveze za vse proizvajalce izvoznike in CCCME.
Interested parties were granted the opportunity to be heard and to comment pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
F. PISNA STALIŠČA IN ZASLIŠANJA
ZNSHINE and one interested party submitted comments.
Zainteresirane strani so imele priložnost, da izrazijo svoja stališča in predložijo pripombe v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
Comments by ZNSHINE
Družba ZNSHINE in ena zainteresirana stran sta predložili pripombe.
ZNSHINE claimed that one of the companies involved in the activities detailed in recitals (14) and (15) is not its related party as it is merely a customer of ZNSHINE in a third country.
Pripombe družbe ZNSHINE
The available information that the Commission quoted describes ZNSHINE's business relationship with this customer.
Družba ZNSHINE je trdila, da ena od družb, vključenih v dejavnosti, opisane v uvodnih izjavah 14 in 15, ni njena povezana stranka, saj je zgolj stranka družbe ZNSHINE v tretji državi.
However, this business relationship is not legally recognised in any way.
Razpoložljive informacije, ki jih je navedla Komisija, opisujejo poslovni odnos družbe ZNSHINE s to stranko.
In addition, ZNSHINE claimed that it cannot control to whom this customer sells the products.
Vendar pa ta poslovni odnos v nobenem primeru ni pravno priznan.
The Commission rejects these arguments as ZNSHINE did not submit any evidence supporting these claims, for example information on the ownership of their alleged customer which would rebut the available information referred to in recital (15).
Poleg tega je družba ZNSHINE trdila, da nima nadzora, komu navedena stranka prodaja izdelke.
In addition, even if the company in question is an independent customer, quod non, ZNSHINE failed to take any precaution to prevent the modules being sold to the Union by this customer and thus would breach another clause of the undertaking.
Komisija te trditve zavrača, saj družba ZNSHINE ni predložila nobenih dokazov, ki bi podprli te trditve, na primer informacije o lastništvu domnevne stranke, ki bi ovrgle razpoložljive informacije iz uvodne izjave 15.
ZNSHINE also claimed that the Commission did not provide sufficient information on the identity of the Union importer.
Poleg tega, tudi če je zadevno podjetje neodvisna stranka, quod non, družba ZNSHINE ni sprejela nikakršnih previdnostnih ukrepov za preprečitev prodaje modulov te stranke v Unijo in je s tem kršila drugo določbo zaveze.
Therefore, ZNSHINE was not in a position to comment on the factual accuracy.
Družba ZNSHINE je tudi trdila, da Komisija ni predložila dovolj podatkov o identiteti uvoznika Unije.
ZNSHINE also claimed that the Union importer cannot be considered its related party, unless ZNSHINE and the Union importer are officers or directors of one another's business.
Zato družba ZNSHINE ni v položaju, da bi komentirala točnost dejstev.
A third party being officer or director of both companies may not alter this condition.
Družba ZNSHINE je tudi trdila, da se uvoznik Unije ne more šteti za njeno povezano stranko, razen če sta družba ZNSHINE in uvoznik Unije vodilna uradnika ali direktorja podjetij drug drugega.
The Commission rejects this argument.
Tretja stranka, ki je vodilni uradnik ali direktor obeh družb, ne more spremeniti tega pogoja.
Firstly, the Commission may not disclose the identity of the Union importer due to confidentiality reasons.
Komisija zavrača ta argument.
Secondly, in line with established practice of the Commission [11], Article 143(1)(a) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [12] (IPCCC), which is the basis for defining related parties in the undertaking, is interpreted as involving also situations where two legal persons have common officers or directors.
Prvič, Komisija zaradi zaupnosti ne sme razkriti identitete uvoznika Unije.
This is the situation at present.
Drugič, v skladu z ustaljeno prakso Komisije [11] se člen 143(1)(a) Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [12] („IPCCC“), ki je podlaga za opredelitev povezane stranke v podjetju, razlaga tako, da vključuje tudi primere, ko imata dve pravni osebi skupne vodilne uradnike ali direktorje.
In addition, the situation at stake falls also under Article 143(1)(f) IPCCC.
To velja sedaj.
The term ‘controlled’ used in this provision means that the third person shall be deemed to control another when the former is legally or operationally in a position to exercise restraint or direction over the latter.
Poleg tega zdajšnja situacija spada tudi na področje uporabe člena 143(1)(f) IPCCC.
This interpretation follows from the Text of Interpretative Note to Article 15 of the Agreement on Implementation of Article VII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (Customs Valuation Agreement) which is the basis for the definition of related parties in Article 143(1) IPCCC.
Izraz „nadzirati“, uporabljen v tej določbi, pomeni, da tretja oseba nadzira drugo, kadar je prejšnja pravno ali dejansko v položaju, da slednjo omejuje ali vodi.
Given the level of involvement of the common officer or director in the companies at stake it is clear that this person is legally or operationally in a position to exercise restraint or direction over the two companies concerned.
Ta razlaga izhaja iz besedila pojasnjevalne opombe k členu 15 Sporazuma o izvajanju člena VII Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini iz leta 1994 (Sporazum o carinskem vrednotenju), ki je podlaga za opredelitev povezane stranke v členu 143(1) IPCCC.
ZNSHINE also argued that they acted in accordance with the terms of the undertaking when consulting the Commission upon the detection of the reporting errors.
Glede na raven vključenosti skupnega vodilnega uradnika ali direktorja zadevnih družb, je jasno, da je ta oseba pravno ali dejansko v položaju, da zadevni družbi omejuje ali vodi.
These errors were due to inexperience personnel acting in good faith which the Dutch judicial authorities confirmed.
Družba ZNSHINE je tudi trdila, da so ravnali v skladu s pogoji zaveze, ko so se po odkritju napak v poročanju posvetovali s Komisijo.
In addition, ZNSHINE claimed that the reporting error did not lead to the breach of the MIP.
Te napake so nastale zaradi pomanjkanja izkušenj osebja, ki je ravnalo v dobri veri, kar so potrdili tudi nizozemski pravosodni organi.
The Commission rejects these arguments.
Poleg tega je družba ZNSHINE trdila, da napaka v poročanju ni povzročila kršitve MIP.
Firstly, ZNSHINE cited one sentence from a judgment but failed to provide the entire judgment to the Commission.
Komisija te trditve zavrača.
Secondly, the Commission provided information on the reporting obligations at several occasions, including the period when the reporting error occurred.
Prvič, družba ZNSHINE je navedla en stavek iz sodbe, vendar Komisiji ni predložila celotne sodbe.
ZNSHINE did not contact the Commission until the issue was spotted by national customs authorities.
Drugič, Komisija je ob več priložnostih predložila informacije o obveznosti poročanja, vključno z obdobjem, ko je prišlo do napake.
Finally, the argument that the reporting error did not lead to the breach of the MIP has no relevance for the assessment concerning the breach of the reporting obligation.
Družba ZNSHINE je stopila v stik s Komisijo šele, ko so nacionalni carinski organi opazili napako.
Therefore, the Commission upholds the assessment of the breaches of ZNSHINE's undertaking.
Nazadnje, trditev, da napaka ni mogla povzročiti kršitve MIP, ni pomembna za oceno glede kršitve obveznosti poročanja.
In fact, ZNSHINE has not contested that the transhipped solar modules were produced by itself.
Zato Komisija vztraja pri oceni glede kršitve družbe ZNSHINE.
Comments by the other interested party
Družba ZNSHINE namreč ni nasprotovala trditvi, da je sama proizvedla pretovorjene solarne module.
One interested party requested that for this company the withdrawal should have retroactive effect as the breaches of the undertaking in which ZNSHINE engaged were serious.
Pripombe druge zainteresirane strani
The interested party further requested that such retroactive withdrawal be applied to future similar cases.
Ena zainteresirana stran je zahtevala, da bi za to družbo umik moral imeti retroaktivni učinek, saj je šlo pri kršitvah, pri katerih je sodelovala družba ZNSHINE, za resne kršitve.
The interested party has assumed that national customs authorities have been investigating ZNSHINE and have seized significant quantities of falsely declared imports.
Zainteresirana stran je nadalje zahtevala, da se tak retroaktivni umik uporablja za podobne primere v prihodnosti.
In addition, in their view, the total amount of duties avoided by the three exporting producers from whom the Commission withdrew the undertaking [13] and by ZNSHINE accounts to several hundred millions of euros which justifies the retroactive withdrawal.
Zainteresirana stran je domnevala, da so nacionalni carinski organi preiskovali družbo ZNSHINE ter da so zasegli velike količine napačno prijavljenega uvoza.
The Commission rejects this request as there is no legal basis for such retroactive withdrawal.
Poleg tega po mnenju zainteresirane strani skupni znesek dajatev, katerim so se izognili trije proizvajalci izvozniki, od katerih je Komisija umaknila zavezo [13], ter družba ZNSHINE, znaša več sto milijonov eurov, kar utemeljuje retroaktivni umik.
In addition, the national customs authorities requested the payment of anti-dumping and countervailing duties for the transactions in question; hence retroactive withdrawal is not needed.
Komisija to zahtevo zavrača, saj za takšen retroaktivni umik ni pravne podlage.
The Commission also points out that the interested party has made unsubstantiated assumptions in its submission.
Poleg tega so nacionalni carinski organi zahtevali plačilo protidampinških in izravnalnih dajatev za zadevne transakcije; zato retroaktivni umik ni potreben.
The Commission also rejects the interested party's argument on the alleged amount of duties avoided as an unjustified allegation.
Komisija opozarja tudi na to, da je zainteresirana stran v svojem stališču predložila neutemeljene predpostavke.
G. WITHDRAWAL OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING AND IMPOSITIONS OF DEFINITIVE DUTIES
Komisija zavrača tudi trditev zainteresirane strani o domnevnem znesku dajatev, ki niso bile poravnane, kot neutemeljeno trditev.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 8(7) and (9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, Article 13(7) and (9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and also in accordance with the terms of the undertaking, the Commission has concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking for ZNSHINE shall be withdrawn.
G. UMIK SPREJETJA ZAVEZE IN DOLOČITEV DOKONČNIH DAJATEV
Accordingly, pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 and the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 automatically apply to imports originating in or consigned from the PRC of the product concerned and produced by ZNSHINE (TARIC additional code: B923) as of the day of entry into force of this Regulation.
Zato je Komisija v skladu s členom 8(7) in (9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe ter členom 13(7) in (9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe ter tudi v skladu s pogoji zaveze sklenila, da se sprejetje zaveze za družbo ZNSHINE umakne.
For information purposes the table in the Annex to this Regulation lists the exporting producers for whom the acceptance of the undertaking by Implementing Decision 2014/657/EU is not affected,
V skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe se dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1238/2013, in dokončna izravnalna dajatev, uvedena s členom 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1239/2013, začneta avtomatično uporabljati za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK ali ki je od tam poslan in ga proizvaja družba ZNSHINE (dodatna oznaka TARIC: B923) z dnem začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
V informativne namene so v tabeli v Prilogi k tej uredbi navedeni proizvajalci izvozniki, za katere se sprejetje zaveze z Izvedbenim sklepom 2014/657/EU ne spremeni –
Acceptance of the undertaking in relation to ZNSHINE PV-TECH CO.
Člen 1
LTD together with its related company in the European Union jointly covered by TARIC additional code B923 is hereby withdrawn.
Sprejetje zaveze glede družbe ZNSHINE PV-TECH CO.
Article 2
LTD in njene povezane družbe v Evropski uniji, ki sta združeno zajeti z dodatno oznako TARIC B923, se umakne.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Člen 2
Done at Brussels, 18 August 2015.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
For the Commission
V Bruslju, 18. avgusta 2015
OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.
UL L 343, 22.12.2009, str. 51.
OJ L 152, 5.6.2013, p. 5.
UL L 188, 18.7.2009, str. 93.
OJ L 209, 3.8.2013, p. 26.
UL L 152, 5.6.2013, str. 5.
OJ L 209, 3.8.2013, p. 1.
UL L 209, 3.8.2013, str. 26.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 1.
UL L 209, 3.8.2013, str. 1.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 66.
UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str. 1.
OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p. 214.
UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str. 66.
OJ L 270, 11.9.2014, p. 6.
UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str. 214.
OJ L 139, 5.6.2015, p. 30.
UL L 270, 11.9.2014, str. 6.
Recitals 14 et sec. of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 856/2010 of 27 September 2010 terminating the partial interim review of Regulation (EC) No 661/2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia (OJ L 254, 29.9.2010, p.
UL L 139, 5.6.2015, str. 30.
5).
Uvodna izjava 14 in naslednje uvodne izjave Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 856/2010 z dne 27. septembra 2010 o zaključku delnega vmesnega pregleda Uredbe (ES) št. 661/2008 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve za uvoz amonijevega nitrata s poreklom iz Rusije (UL L 254, 29.9.2010, str.
OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1.
5).
ANNEX
UL L 253, 11.10.1993, str. 1.
List of companies:
PRILOGA
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1404
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1404
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1407
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1407
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 170/2013 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of Croatia
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 170/2013 o prehodnih ukrepih v sektorju sladkorja zaradi pristopa Hrvaške
Having regard to the Act of Accession of Croatia [1], and in particular Articles 41 and 16 thereof in conjunction with point 4 of Section 3(a) of Annex IV thereto,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pristopu Republike Hrvaške [1] in zlasti členov 41 in 16 Akta v povezavi s točko 4 oddelka 3(a) Priloge IV k Aktu,
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 170/2013 [2] lays down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of Croatia to the Union.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 170/2013 [2] določa prehodne ukrepe v sektorju sladkorja zaradi pristopa Hrvaške k Uniji.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1345/2014 [3] determined the surplus quantities of sugar in Croatia stockpiled prior to its accession and which have to be eliminated from the Union market at the expense of Croatia in accordance with the deadlines set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 170/2013, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 968/2014 [4].
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1345/2014 [3] je določila presežne količine zalog sladkorja na Hrvaškem, ki so nastale pred njenim pristopom in ki jih je treba izločiti s trga Unije na stroške Hrvaške v skladu z roki iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 170/2013, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 968/2014 [4].
By its letter of 19 May 2015, Croatia has informed the Commission that, while it does not question the obligation to ensure the elimination of the surplus sugar quantities, as determined by the Commission, from the market by 30 September 2015, it has experienced unforeseen procedural difficulties in the implementation of the obligation to compel the operators concerned to eliminate those surplus quantities and that additional time is needed to overcome those difficulties.
V dopisu z dne 19. maja 2015 je Hrvaška Komisijo obvestila, da sicer ne dvomi v obveznost izločitve presežnih količin sladkorja s trga do 30. septembra 2015, kot je določila Komisija, vendar je naletela na nepredvidene postopkovne težave pri izvajanju obveznosti, da zadevne izvajalce prisili k izločitvi teh presežnih količin, ter da potrebuje dodaten čas za odpravo teh težav.
It is therefore appropriate to extend the deadlines provided for by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 170/2013 by six months.
Zato je primerno, da se roki, določeni z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 170/2013, podaljšajo za šest mesecev.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 170/2013 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 170/2013 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 170/2013 is amended as follows:
Izvedbena uredba (EU) št. 170/2013 se spremeni:
In Article 9(1), ‘30 September 2015’ is replaced by ‘31 March 2016’;
V členu 9(1) se datum „30. septembra 2015“ nadomesti z datumom „31. marca 2016“.
‘30 September 2015’ is replaced by ‘31 March 2016’;
datum „30. septembra 2015“ se nadomesti z datumom „31. marca 2016“;
‘31 May 2016’ is replaced by ‘30 November 2016’;
datum „31. maja 2016“ se nadomesti z datumom „30. novembra 2016“.
In paragraph 1, ‘31 December 2015’ is replaced by ‘30 June 2016’;
v odstavku 1 se datum „31. decembra 2015“ nadomesti z datumom „30. junija 2016“;
In the fourth subparagraph of paragraph 2, ‘30 September 2015’ is replaced by ‘31 March 2016’;
v četrtem pododstavku odstavka 2 se datum „30. septembra 2015“ nadomesti z datumom „31. marca 2016“.
In paragraph 1, ‘31 January 2016’ is replaced by ‘31 July 2016’;
v odstavku 1 se datum „31. januarja 2016“ nadomesti z datumom „31. julija 2016“;
in the first subparagraph, ‘30 September 2015’ is replaced by ‘31 March 2016’;
v prvem pododstavku se datum „30. septembra 2015“ nadomesti z datumom „31. marca 2016“;
in the second subparagraph, ‘31 May 2016’ is replaced by ‘30 November 2016’;
v drugem pododstavku se datum „31. maja 2016“ nadomesti z datumom „30. novembra 2016“;
in the third subparagraph, ‘31 March 2016’ is replaced by ‘30 September 2016’.
v tretjem pododstavku se datum „31. marca 2016“ nadomesti z datumom „30. septembra 2016“.
Done at Brussels, 19 August 2015.
V Bruslju, 19. avgusta 2015
OJ L 112, 24.4.2012, p. 10.
UL L 112, 24.4.2012, str. 10.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1345/2014 of 17 December 2014 on the determination of surplus quantities of sugar, isoglucose and fructose in Croatia (OJ L 363, 18.12.2014, p. 80).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1345/2014 z dne 17. decembra 2014 o določitvi presežnih količin sladkorja, izoglukoze in fruktoze na Hrvaškem (UL L 363, 18.12.2014, str. 80).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 968/2014 of 12 September 2014 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 170/2013 laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of Croatia (OJ L 272, 13.9.2014, p. 6).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 968/2014 z dne 12. septembra 2014 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 170/2013 o prehodnih ukrepih v sektorju sladkorja zaradi pristopa Hrvaške (UL L 272, 13.9.2014, str. 6).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1408
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1408
concerning the authorisation of DL-methionyl-DL-methionine as a feed additive for fish and crustaceans
o izdaji dovoljenja za DL-metionil-DL-metionin kot krmni dodatek za ribe in rake
In accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 an application was submitted for the authorisation of DL-methionyl-DL-methionine as a feed additive.
V skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/2003 je bil vložen zahtevek za izdajo dovoljenja za DL-metionil-DL-metionin kot krmni dodatek.