natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the airports offer necessary services to air carriers, and do not unduly prejudice their commercial opportunities.
letališča in mesta ali somestja, ki jim ta služijo, so povezana s pogostimi, zanesljivimi in učinkovitimi javnimi prevoznimi storitvami in
Further, the distribution of air traffic between the airports concerned shall respect the principles of proportionality and transparency, and shall be based on objective criteria.
letališča nudijo potrebne storitve letalskim prevoznikom ter ne posegajo neupravičeno v njihove poslovne priložnosti.
Article 19(3) of the Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 provides that a Member State concerned shall inform the Commission of its intention to regulate the distribution of air traffic or to change an existing traffic distribution rule.
Odločitev o porazdelitvi zračnega prometa med zadevna letališča upošteva načeli sorazmernosti in preglednosti ter temelji na objektivnih merilih.
It also provides that the Commission shall examine the application of Article 19(2) and, within 6 months of receipt of the information from the Member State, and after having asked the Committee set up in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 for opinion shall decide whether the Member State may apply the measures.
Člen 19(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008 določa, da zadevna država članica obvesti Komisijo o svojih namenih glede urejanja porazdelitve zračnega prometa ali glede spreminjanja veljavnih pravil o porazdelitvi prometa.
It adds that the Commission shall publish its decision in the Official Journal of the European Union and that the measures shall not be applied before the publication of the Commission's approval.
Prav tako določa, da Komisija prouči uporabo člena 19(2) ter v šestih mesecih po prejemu obvestila države članice in potem, ko je za mnenje zaprosila odbor iz člena 25 Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008, odloči, ali država članica lahko uporabi ukrepe.
ASSESSMENT
Poleg tega mora Komisija svojo odločitev objaviti v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, ukrepi pa se ne uporabljajo pred objavo odobritve Komisije.
The amendments modify the rules regarding traffic distribution for the airports serving Paris by extending the scope of application of the existing rules to extra-EEA services, which has the effect of restricting access of certain types of services to/from each of the airports.
OCENA
This constitutes a change to an existing traffic distribution rule within the meaning of Article 19(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.
S spremembami se spreminjajo pravila o porazdelitvi prometa za letališča, ki služijo Parizu, in sicer se področje uporabe obstoječih pravil razširi na prevoze zunaj EGP, kar omejuje dostop nekaterih vrst prevozov na posamezno letališče in z njega.
According to its terms, this provision is not limited to traffic within the EU or (in view of incorporation of the Regulation into the EEA Agreement) within the EEA.
To je sprememba obstoječega pravila o porazdelitvi prometa v smislu člena 19(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008.
Moreover, under a number of agreements with certain third countries which are currently applied, such as those with the Swiss Confederation or the United States of America, Union air carriers and air carriers from those third countries are entitled to provide services between any point in the Union and the territory of the third country concerned.
Glede na svoje besedilo ta določba ni omejena na promet znotraj EU ali (glede na prihodnjo vključitev Uredbe v Sporazum EGP) znotraj EGP.
Lastly, carriers of any given Member State having a secondary establishment in another Member State are entitled to benefit without discrimination from rights flowing from bilateral agreements concluded by the latter Member State, in accordance with the Court's jurisprudence [9].
Poleg tega imajo v skladu s številnimi trenutno veljavnimi sporazumi z nekaterimi tretjimi državami, kot so sporazumi s Švicarsko konfederacijo ali Združenimi državami Amerike, letalski prevozniki Unije in letalski prevozniki iz tretjih držav pravico opravljanja letov med katero koli točko v Uniji in ozemljem zadevne tretje države.
Another change to an existing traffic distribution rule, within the meaning of Article 19(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, resides in the fact that certain restrictions regarding the Orly airport are lifted, as explained in recital 11 above.
Prevozniki katere koli države članice, ki ustanovijo sekundarni sedež v drugi državi članici, lahko brez diskriminacije uživajo pravice, ki izhajajo iz dvostranskih sporazumov, ki jih je sklenila ta država članica, v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča [9].
CONSULTATION
Druga sprememba veljavnega pravila o porazdelitvi prometa v smislu člena 19(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008 je, da se nekatere omejitve, ki zadevajo letališče Orly, odpravijo, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 11 zgoraj.
The Commission notes that the French authorities conducted an official public consultation by notice of 19 May 2015 to which any interested party was invited to reply.
POSVETOVANJE
The Commission has no indications that the replies were not taken into consideration by the French authorities.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so francoski organi izvedli uradno javno posvetovanje z obvestilom z dne 19. maja 2015, na katerega so lahko odgovorile vse zainteresirane strani.
On the contrary, it observes that the draft rules were changed following the consultation.
Komisija nima podatkov o tem, ali so francoski organi odgovore upoštevali.
Therefore, the Commission considers that interested parties were adequately consulted as required by Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.
Opaža pa, da je bil po posvetovanju spremenjen osnutek pravil.
COMPLIANCE OF THE THREE AIRPORTS IN QUESTION WITH THE CRITERIA SET OUT IN ARTICLE 19(2), FIRST SUBPARAGRAPH, OF REGULATION (EC) No 1008/2008
Zato Komisija meni, da je bilo posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi ustrezno, kot zahteva člen 19(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008.
The Commission is satisfied that the three airports in question, Orly, Charles-de-Gaulle and Le Bourget satisfy the requirements of Article 19(2).
SKLADNOST TREH ZADEVNIH LETALIŠČ Z MERILI IZ PRVEGA PODODSTAVKA ČLENA 19(2) UREDBE (ES) št. 1008/2008
The airports serve the conurbation of Paris, they are accessible through adequate road transport infrastructure as well as public transportation within 35 minutes to about an hour, the airports are linked to one another and the city of Paris by frequent and reliable public transportation, and the airports offer necessary services to air carriers, namely air traffic control, ground-handling and the processing of passengers.
Komisija je zadovoljna, da vsa tri letališča, Orly, Charles-de-Gaulle in Le Bourget, izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 19(2).
NON-DISCRIMINATION
Letališča služijo somestju Pariza, dostopna so prek ustrezne infrastrukture za cestni prevoz in z javnim prevozom, ki traja od 35 minut do približno ene ure, letališča so povezana med seboj in s Parizom s pogostim in zanesljivim javnim prevozom ter nudijo potrebne storitve letalskim prevoznikom, tj. kontrolo zračnega prometa, zemeljsko oskrbo in obdelavo potnikov.
The rules as amended would not display any discrimination among destinations inside the Union, nor on grounds of nationality or identity of air carriers.
PREPOVED DISKRIMINACIJE
Hence, the amendments comply with the criteria of non-discrimination set out in Article 19(2).
Spremenjena pravila ne bi povzročila diskriminacije določenih namembnih krajev v Uniji na podlagi državljanstva ali identitete letalskih prevoznikov.
JUSTIFICATION AND PROPORTIONALITY
Zato spremembe ustrezajo merilom nediskriminacije iz člena 19(2).
The abolition of the limitations regarding Orly simply undoes existing restrictions, without creating any new ones.
UTEMELJITEV IN SORAZMERNOST
The restrictions were introduced in order to encourage the use of slots for different destinations and to prevent carriers from using aircraft below a certain size threshold on routes with large amounts of passenger traffic, just to satisfy slot use requirements.
Odprava omejitev za letališče Orly enostavno odpravi obstoječe omejitve in pri tem ne uvede novih.
However, given the circumstances described in recital 8 above, the rules have become unnecessary.
Omejitve so bile uvedene, da bi se spodbudila uporaba slotov za različne namembne kraje in da bi prevoznikom preprečili, da uporabljajo zrakoplove pod določenim pragom velikosti na progah z velikimi količinami potniškega prometa samo zaradi izpolnitve zahtev glede uporabe slotov.
In regard to the other effects of the intended amendments, the new restrictions created are the following:
Vendar glede na okoliščine, opisane v uvodni izjavi 8, pravila niso več potrebna.
at Orly and Charles-de-Gaulle, non-scheduled, extra-EEA services provided on small aircraft, for which the seats are not marketed individually to the public, will be prohibited,
Glede na druge učinke načrtovanih sprememb so na novo uvedene omejitve naslednje:
at Le Bourget, scheduled extra-EEA flights and extra-EEA flights provided on large aircraft will be prohibited.
Na letališčih Orly in Charles-de-Gaulle bodo prepovedani posebni prevozi zunaj EGP z majhnim zrakoplovom, katerega sedeži se javnosti ne tržijo posamezno.
The interested party states that the restrictions are excessive.
Na letališču Le Bourget bodo prepovedani redni leti zunaj EGP in leti zunaj EGP na velikih zrakoplovih.
The Commission does not agree.
Zainteresirana stran trdi, da so omejitve pretirane.
The traffic distribution rules serve two purposes:
Komisija se s tem ne strinja.
On the one hand the intention is to optimise the use of limited airport capacity at Orly and Charles-de-Gaulle.
Pravila o porazdelitvi prometa so dvonamenska.
Therefore non-scheduled services provided on aircraft having a capacity of 25 seats or less where the seats are not individually marketed to the public are directed to Le Bourget in order not to disrupt the regular traffic sequence at Orly and Charles-de-Gaulle.
Po eni strani gre za optimizacijo uporabe omejenih zmogljivosti letališč na letališčih Orly in Charles-de-Gaulle.
On the other hand the intention is to confine traffic to and from Le Bourget to non-scheduled services provided on aircraft having a capacity of 25 seats or less for which the seats are not individually marketed to the public, since accommodating other types of services would require prior investments in order to adapt the airport's infrastructure.
Zato so posebni zračni prevozi z zrakoplovom z zmogljivostjo 25 sedežev ali manj, katerega sedeži se javnosti ne tržijo posamezno, usmerjeni na letališče Le Bourget, da ne bi prekinili enakomernega zaporedja na letališčih Orly in Charles-de-Gaulle.
Therefore, the distinctions envisaged by the French Authorities, based on types of services (their scheduled or non-scheduled character, as well as the way in which seats are marketed) and size of aircraft, appear capable of achieving the objectives pursued.
Po drugi strani gre za omejitev prometa na letališče Le Bourget in z njega na posebne letalske prevoze z zrakoplovom z zmogljivostjo 25 sedežev ali manj, katerega sedeži se javnosti ne tržijo posamezno, saj bi bile za uvedbo drugih vrst prevozov potrebne predhodne naložbe za prilagoditev letališke infrastrukture.
Likewise, the measure does not appear to go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.
Zato se zdi, da je na podlagi razlik, ki so jih predvideli francoski organi ter temeljijo na vrsti prevozov (redni ali posebni prevoz ter način trženja sedežev) in velikosti zrakoplova, mogoče doseči zastavljene cilje.
To the extent that certain extra-EEA services are intended to be reserved to Charles-de-Gaulle and Orly airports, nothing suggests that the objective has been to procure advantages to the company operating those airports (ADP), rather than to achieve the abovementioned optimisation.
Prav tako ukrep ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje zastavljenih ciljev.
In this context the Commission also observes that the French authorities initially intended to give small aircraft carrying connecting passengers general access to Orly airport, a solution which ADP itself contested.
Iz dejstva, da se nekateri prevozi zunaj EGP pridržijo za letališči Charles-de-Gaulle in Orly, ni mogoče sklepati, da je cilj namesto doseganja zgoraj omenjene optimizacije zagotoviti prednosti za družbo, ki navedeni letališči upravlja (ADP).
The Commission thus considers that the intended amendments are objectively justified and proportionate.
V zvezi s tem Komisija tudi navaja, da so francoski organi prvotno nameravali dati majhnim zrakoplovom, ki prevažajo tranzitne potnike, na voljo splošni dostop do letališča Orly, ADP pa je to rešitev zavrnila.
OBJECTIVE CRITERIA
Komisija zato meni, da so nameravane spremembe objektivno utemeljene in sorazmerne.
The intended amendments are based on objective criteria (size and type of service, as explained above) and necessary in order to pursue the abovementioned aims of the traffic distribution rules.
OBJEKTIVNA MERILA
TRANSPARENCY
Načrtovane spremembe temeljijo na objektivnih merilih (velikost in vrsta prevoza, kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj) in so potrebne za dosego zgoraj navedenih ciljev pravil o porazdelitvi prometa.
Lastly, the intended amendments will be published, as are the rules currently applicable, and will thus be transparent.
PREGLEDNOST
CONCLUSION
Načrtovane spremembe bodo transparentne, saj bodo objavljene, kot so objavljena tudi trenutno veljavna pravila.
In conclusion, the Commission considers that the intended amendment to the traffic distribution rules as set out in Decree of 15 November 1994 on the distribution of intra-Community air traffic within the Paris airport system, are compatible with the requirements in Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.
SKLEP
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Advisory Committee referred to in Article 25 of the Regulation,
Komisija meni, da so načrtovane spremembe pravil o porazdelitvi prometa iz odloka z dne 15. novembra 1994 o porazdelitvi zračnega prometa znotraj Skupnosti v letališkem sistemu Pariza v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem svetovalnega odbora iz člena 25 Uredbe –
The intended amendment to the traffic distribution rules set out in the Decree of 15 November 1994 ‘on the distribution of intra-Community air traffic within the Paris airport system’, notified to the Commission on 28 September 2015, is hereby approved.
Člen 1
Article 2
Predvidene spremembe pravil o porazdelitvi prometa iz odloka z dne 15. novembra 1994 „o porazdelitvi zračnega prometa znotraj Skupnosti v letališkem sistemu Pariza“, o katerih je bila Komisija obveščena 28. septembra 2015, se odobrijo.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of France.
Člen 2
Done at Brussels, 10 May 2016.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Republiko Francijo.
For the Commission
V Bruslju, 10. maja 2016
OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p. 3.
Članica Komisije
The intention is to bring about the relevant changes by way of a new decree, replacing the 1994 decree.
UL L 293, 31.10.2008, str. 3.
OJ C 400, 2.12.2015, p. 4.
Namen je uvesti ustrezne spremembe z novim odlokom, ki nadomešča odlok iz leta 1994.
Commission Decision 95/259/EC of 14 March 1995 on a procedure relating to the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 (Case VII/AMA/9/94 — French traffic distribution rules for the airport system of Paris) (OJ L 162, 13.7.1995, p. 25).
UL C 400, 2.12.2015, str. 4.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes (OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 8), repealed by Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 (recast).
UL L 162, 13.7.1995, str. 25.
Under the current rules, applicable to intra-EEA-services only, the more favourable treatment of connecting flights is not automatic, as a default position, but may be granted by way of derogation.
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2408/92 z dne 23. julija 1992 o dostopu letalskih prevoznikov Skupnosti do letalskih prog znotraj Skupnosti (UL L 240, 24.8.1992, str. 8), razveljavljena s členom 27 Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008 (prenovitev).
Explained in a letter from the French authorities from 30 November 2015.
V skladu z veljavnimi pravili, ki se uporabljajo samo za prevoze znotraj EGP, ugodnejša obravnava povezovalnih letov ni samodejna, kot privzeto stališče, lahko pa se odobri z odstopanjem.
Detailed in a letter from the French authorities from 30 November 2015.
Obrazloženo v dopisu francoskih organov z dne 30. novembra 2015.
Case C-467/98, Commission v Denmark, paragraphs 122 et seq.
Podrobneje v dopisu francoskih organov z dne 30. novembra 2015.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/708
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/708
of 11 May 2016
z dne 11. maja 2016
on the compliance of the ‘Austrian Agricultural Certification Scheme’ with the conditions set out in Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o skladnosti „Avstrijskega sistema kmetijskega certificiranja“ s pogoji iz direktiv 98/70/ES in 2009/28/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC [2], and in particular Article 18(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/28/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o spodbujanju uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov, spremembi in poznejši razveljavitvi direktiv 2001/77/ES in 2003/30/ES [2] ter zlasti člena 18(6) Direktive,
Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC lay down, inter alia, sustainability criteria for biofuels and bioliquids.
Direktivi 98/70/ES in 2009/28/ES med drugim določata trajnostna merila za biogoriva in tekoča biogoriva.
Provisions of Articles 7b, 7c and Annex IV of Directive 98/70/EC are similar to provisions of Articles 17, 18 and Annex V of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Določbe iz členov 7b in 7c ter Priloge IV k Direktivi 98/70/ES so podobne določbam iz členov 17 in 18 ter Priloge V k Direktivi 2009/28/ES.
Where biofuels and bioliquids are to be taken into account for the purposes referred to in Article 7a of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 17(1)(a), (b) and (c) of Directive 2009/28/EC, Member States must require economic operators to show the compliance of biofuels and bioliquids with the sustainability criteria set out in, respectively, Article 7b(2) to (5) of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 17(2) to (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Ko se biogoriva in tekoča biogoriva upoštevajo za namene iz člena 7a Direktive 98/70/ES ter člena 17(1)(a), (b) in (c) Direktive 2009/28/ES, bi morale države članice od gospodarskih subjektov zahtevati, da dokažejo skladnost biogoriv in tekočih biogoriv s trajnostnimi merili iz člena 7b(2) do (5) Direktive 98/70/ES in člena 17(2) do (5) Direktive 2009/28/ES.
To this end, economic operators may provide proof or data obtained in accordance with, inter alia, a voluntary national or international scheme, or a national scheme.
V ta namen lahko gospodarski subjekti predložijo dokaz ali podatke, pridobljene med drugim v skladu s prostovoljnim nacionalnim ali mednarodnim sistemom oziroma nacionalnim sistemom.
A Member State may notify its national scheme to the Commission.
Država članica lahko svoj nacionalni sistem priglasi Komisiji.
Where the Commission decides that such a notified national scheme complies with the conditions set out in Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC, schemes established in accordance with Article 7c of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 18 of Directive 2009/28/EC may not refuse mutual recognition with that Member State's scheme, as regards the verification of compliance with the sustainability criteria set out in Article 7b(2) to (5) of Directive 98/70/EC and Article 17(2) to (5) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
Ko se Komisija odloči, da tak priglašeni nacionalni sistem izpolnjuje pogoje iz direktiv 98/70/ES in 2009/28/ES, sistemi, vzpostavljeni v skladu s členom 7c Direktive 98/70/ES in členom 18 Direktive 2009/28/ES, ne smejo zavrniti medsebojnega priznavanja s sistemom zadevne države članice glede preverjanja izpolnjevanja trajnostnih meril, določenih v členu 7b(2) do (5) Direktive 98/70/ES in členu 17(2) do (5) Direktive 2009/28/ES.
On 29 September 2015, Austria notified its national scheme (the ‘Austrian Agricultural Certification Scheme’) to the Commission.
Avstrija je 29. septembra 2015 Komisiji priglasila svoj nacionalni sistem („Avstrijski sistem kmetijskega certificiranja“).
The scheme covers agricultural feedstocks and vegetable oils and is applied up to the initial processing of these feedstocks.
Sistem zajema kmetijske surovine in rastlinska olja ter se uporablja za njihovo začetno predelavo.
The Commission assessed the compliance of the Austrian Agricultural Certification Scheme with the conditions set out in Directive 98/70/EC and Directive 2009/28/EC.
Komisija je ocenila skladnost avstrijskega sistema kmetijskega certificiranja s pogoji iz Direktive 98/70/ES in Direktive 2009/28/ES.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on the Sustainability of Biofuels and Bioliquids established by Article 25(2) of Directive 2009/28/EC,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za trajnost biogoriv in tekočih biogoriv, ustanovljenega s členom 25(2) Direktive 2009/28/ES –
The Austrian Agricultural Certification Scheme complies with the conditions set out in Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC.
Avstrijski sistem kmetijskega certificiranja je skladen s pogoji iz direktiv 98/70/ES in 2009/28/ES.
Done at Brussels, 11 May 2016.
V Bruslju, 11. maja 2016
OJ L 350, 28.12.1998, p. 58
UL L 350, 28.12.1998, str. 58.
OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 16
UL L 140, 5.6.2009, str. 16.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/712
Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2016/712
of 12 May 2016
z dne 12. maja 2016
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ter zlasti člena 28, člena 42(4) in člena 43(2) Pogodbe,
Decision 2014/486/CFSP, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2015/2249 [2], provided EUAM Ukraine with a reference amount until 30 November 2016 and a mandate until 30 November 2017.
V Sklepu 2014/486/SZVP, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom (SZVP) 2015/2249 [2], sta za EUAM Ukraine določena referenčni znesek do 30. novembra 2016 in mandat do 30. novembra 2017.
The reference amount should be adapted and Decision 2014/486/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,
Referenčni znesek bi bilo treba prilagoditi in zato ustrezno spremeniti Sklep 2014/486/SZVP –
Article 14(1) of Decision 2014/486/CFSP is replaced by the following:
Člen 14(1) Sklepa 2014/486/SZVP se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUAM Ukraine until 30 November 2014 shall be EUR 2680000.
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z EUAM Ukraine, do 30. novembra 2014 znaša 2680000 EUR.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUAM Ukraine for the period from 1 December 2014 to 30 November 2015 shall be EUR 13100000.
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z EUAM Ukraine, za obdobje od 1. decembra 2014 do 30. novembra 2015 znaša 13100000 EUR.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUAM Ukraine for the period from 1 December 2015 to 30 November 2016 shall be EUR 17670000.
Referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z EUAM Ukraine, za obdobje od 1. decembra 2015 do 30. novembra 2016 znaša 17670000 EUR.
The financial reference amount for the subsequent periods shall be decided by the Council.’.
Referenčni finančni znesek za poznejša obdobja določi Svet.“
Done at Brussels, 12 May 2016.
V Bruslju, 12. maja 2016
Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/713
Sklep Sveta (SZVP) 2016/713