natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 of 18 December 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Yemen [1], and in particular Article 15(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1352/2014 z dne 18. decembra 2014 o omejevalnih ukrepih glede na razmere v Jemnu [1] in zlasti člena 15(3) Uredbe,
On 7 November 2014, the Committee designated three individuals on the basis of the criteria set out in paragraph 17 of UNSCR 2140 (2014).
Odbor je 7. novembra 2014 na podlagi meril iz odstavka 17 RVSZN 2140 (2014) na seznam uvrstil tri posameznike.
On 16 September 2015, the Committee amended the information for one person.
Odbor je 16. septembra 2015 spremenil podatke za eno osebo.
Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (EU) št. 1352/2014 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga I k Uredbi (EU) št. 1352/2014 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
In the list of persons, entities and bodies, set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1352/2014, entry No 5 under Section A ‘Persons’ is replaced by the following:
Na seznamu oseb, subjektov in organov iz Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 1352/2014 se vnos št. 5 pod poglavjem A. „Osebe“ nadomesti z naslednjim:
Diplomatic identity card No: 31/2013/20/003140, issued on 7.7.2013 by the United Arab Emirates' Ministry of Foreign Affairs under name Ahmed Ali Abdullah Saleh; current status: cancelled.
Drugi podatki: Ima ključno vlogo pri omogočanju vojaškega prodora Hutijev.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1921
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1921
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 lists the persons and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.
V Prilogi III k Uredbi (ES) št. 314/2004 so navedeni osebe in subjekti, ki jih zadeva zamrznitev sredstev in gospodarskih virov v skladu z navedeno uredbo.
Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP [2] identifies the natural and legal persons to whom restrictions are to apply as provided for in Article 5 of that Decision, and Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 gives effect to that Decision to the extent that action at Union level is required.
Sklep Sveta 2011/101/SZVP [2] opredeljuje fizične in pravne osebe, za katere veljajo omejitve, kakor je določeno v členu 5 navedenega sklepa, Uredba (ES) št. 314/2004 pa uveljavlja navedeni sklep v obsegu, v katerem je potrebno ukrepanje na ravni Unije.
On 26 October 2015, the Council decided to remove the name of one deceased person to whom the restrictions should apply.
Svet je 26. oktobra 2015 sklenil črtati ime ene umrle osebe, za katero bi morale veljati omejitve.
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Prilogo III k Uredbi (ES) št. 314/2004 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
In Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 the following natural persons shall be deleted from the section ‘I. Persons’:
V Prilogi III k Uredbi (ES) št. 314/2004 se iz oddelka „I. Osebe“ črtajo naslednje fizične osebe:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1922
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1922
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2015/1929 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU, Euratom) 2015/1929 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union
o spremembi Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 322 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 322 Pogodbe,
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] lays down the rules for the establishment and the implementation of the general budget of the European Union.
Uredba (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] določa pravila za oblikovanje in izvrševanje splošnega proračuna Evropske unije.
In particular, it also contains rules on public procurement.
Vsebuje tudi pravila o javnih naročilih.
Directives 2014/23/EU [4] and 2014/24/EU [5] of the European Parliament and of the Council were adopted on 26 February 2014 and it is therefore necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 in order to take them into account for contracts awarded by the Union institutions on their own account.
Direktivi 2014/23/EU [4] in 2014/24/EU [5] Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta sta bili sprejeti dne 26. februarja 2014, zato je treba Uredbo (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 spremeniti, da se direktivi upoštevata v zvezi z naročili, ki jih institucije Unije oddajo za svoj račun.
Some definitions should be added and certain technical clarifications should be made to ensure that the terminology of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 is in line with that of Directives 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU.
Treba bi bilo dodati opredelitev nekaterih pojmov in določena tehnična pojasnila, da se zagotovi skladnost terminologije iz Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 s terminologijo iz direktiv 2014/23/EU in 2014/24/EU.
The ex ante and ex post publicity measures necessary to launch a procurement procedure should be clarified in the case of contracts above and below the thresholds set out in Directive 2014/24/EU.
V zvezi z naročili, katerih vrednost je višja in nižja od mejnih vrednosti, določenih v Direktivi 2014/24/EU, bi bilo treba pojasniti predhodne in naknadne ukrepe za obveščanje javnosti, ki so potrebni za začetek postopka za oddajo javnega naročila.
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 should include an exhaustive list of all the procurement procedures available to the Union institutions regardless of the thresholds.
Uredba (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 bi morala vključevati izčrpen seznam vseh postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil, ki so na voljo institucijam Unije, ne glede na mejne vrednosti.
As is the case in Directive 2014/24/EU, Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 should allow for market consultation prior to the launch of a procurement procedure.
V skladu z Direktivo 2014/24/EU bi morala Uredba (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 omogočati preverjanje trga pred začetkom postopka za oddajo javnega naročila.
In addition, it should be clarified how the contracting authorities can contribute to the protection of the environment and the promotion of sustainable development, while ensuring that they can obtain the best value for money for their contracts, in particular through requiring specific labels and/or through the use of appropriate award methods.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba pojasniti, kako lahko javni naročniki prispevajo k varstvu okolja in spodbujanju trajnostnega razvoja, hkrati pa zagotovijo, da bodo lahko za svoja naročila dosegli najboljše razmerje med kakovostjo in ceno, zlasti z zahtevanjem posebnih oznak in/ali z uporabo ustreznih načinov oddaje naročil.
In order to ensure that, when executing contracts, economic operators comply with the applicable environmental, social and labour law obligations established by Union law, national legislation, collective agreements or the applicable international social and environmental conventions listed in Annex X to Directive 2014/24/EU, such obligations should be part of the minimum requirements defined by the contracting authority and should be integrated in the contracts signed by the contracting authority.
Za zagotovitev, da gospodarski subjekti pri izvajanju naročil upoštevajo veljavne obveznosti iz okoljskega, socialnega in delovnega prava, določene v pravu Unije, nacionalni zakonodaji, kolektivnih pogodbah ali veljavnih mednarodnih socialnih in okoljskih konvencijah, navedenih v Prilogi X k Direktivi 2014/24/EU, bi morale biti take obveznosti del minimalnih zahtev, ki bi jih opredelil javni naročnik, in bi morale biti vključene v pogodbe, ki jih podpiše javni naročnik.
In order to protect the Union's financial interests, a single early detection and exclusion system should be set up by the Commission, and the rules for exclusion from participation in procurement procedures should be improved in order to strengthen the protection of those interests.
Komisija bi morala zaradi zaščite finančnih interesov Unije vzpostaviti enoten sistem za zgodnje odkrivanje in izključitev, zaradi okrepitve te zaščite pa bi bilo treba izboljšati pravila za izključitev iz sodelovanja v postopkih za oddajo javnih naročil.
The decision of exclusion of an economic operator from participation in procurement procedures or the imposition of a financial penalty and the decision to publish the related information should be taken by the relevant contracting authority, in view of its autonomy in administrative matters.
Odločitev, da se gospodarski subjekt izključi iz sodelovanja v postopkih za oddajo javnih naročil ali da se mu naloži denarna kazen, ter odločitev, da se objavijo s tem povezane informacije, bi moral zaradi svoje neodvisnosti v upravnih zadevah sprejeti zadevni javni naročnik.
In the absence of a final judgment or final administrative decision and in cases related to a serious breach of contract, the contracting authority should take its decision having regard to the recommendation of a panel on the basis of a preliminary classification in law of the conduct of the economic operator concerned.
Če ni nobene pravnomočne sodbe ali pravnomočne upravne odločbe in če gre za resno kršitev pogodbenih obveznosti, bi moral javni naročnik pri sprejemanju te odločitve upoštevati priporočilo komisije, izhajajoč iz predhodne pravne opredelitve ravnanja zadevnega gospodarskega subjekta.
The panel should also assess the duration of an exclusion in cases where the duration has not been set by the final judgment or the final administrative decision.
Komisija bi morala oceniti tudi trajanje izključitve, če bi to ne bilo določeno že v pravnomočni sodbi ali pravnomočni upravni odločbi.
The role of the panel should be to ensure the coherent operation of the exclusion system.
Vloga komisije bi morala biti, da zagotavlja dosledno delovanje sistema za izključitev.
The panel should be composed of a standing chair, representatives of the Commission and a representative of the relevant contracting authority.
Komisijo bi morali sestavljati stalni predsednik, predstavnika Komisije in predstavnik zadevnega javnega naročnika.
The preliminary classification in law does not prejudge the final assessment of the conduct of the economic operator by the competent authorities of Member States under national law.
Predhodna pravna opredelitev ne prejudicira končne ocene ravnanja gospodarskega subjekta, ki jo v skladu z nacionalnim pravom opravijo pristojni organi držav članic.
The recommendation of the panel, as well as the decision of the contracting authority, should therefore be reviewed following the notification of such a final assessment.
Po obvestilu o takšni končni oceni bi bilo torej treba pregledati priporočilo komisije in odločitev javnega naročnika.
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 should specify the situations giving rise to exclusion.
V Uredbi (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 bi bilo treba določiti, katere situacije povzročajo izključitev.
An economic operator should be excluded by the contracting authority when a final judgment or a final administrative decision has been taken in the case of grave professional misconduct, non-compliance, whether intentional or not, with the obligations related to the payment of social security contributions or the payment of taxes, fraud affecting the general budget of the Union (‘the budget’), corruption, participation in a criminal organisation, money laundering, terrorist financing, terrorist related offences, child labour or other forms of trafficking in human beings or irregularity.
Javni naročnik bi moral izključiti gospodarski subjekt, kadar je že bila izdana pravnomočna sodba ali pravnomočna upravna odločba zaradi hude kršitve poklicnih pravil, namernega ali nenamernega neizpolnjevanja obveznosti, povezanih s plačevanjem prispevkov za socialno varnost ali plačevanjem davkov, goljufije v škodo splošnega proračuna Unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: proračun), korupcije, sodelovanja v hudodelski združbi, pranja denarja, financiranja terorizma, terorističnih kaznivih dejanj, vpletenosti v delo otrok ali druge oblike trgovine z ljudmi ali pa zaradi nepravilnosti.
It should also be excluded in the case of a serious breach of contract or bankruptcy.
Izključiti bi ga bilo treba tudi v primeru resne kršitve pogodbenih obveznosti ali stečaja.
When deciding on the exclusion or the imposition of a financial penalty and on the publication thereof or on the rejection of an economic operator, the contracting authority should ensure compliance with the principle of proportionality by taking into account in particular the seriousness of the situation, its budgetary impact, the time which has elapsed since the relevant conduct, its duration and its recurrence, the intention or degree of negligence and the degree of collaboration of the economic operator with the relevant competent authority and its contribution to the investigation.
Javni naročnik bi moral pri odločanju, ali naj izključi gospodarski subjekt oziroma mu naloži denarno kazen in objavi s tem povezane informacije oziroma ali naj ga zavrne, upoštevati zlasti resnost položaja, njegov vpliv na proračun, čas, ki je pretekel od zadevnega ravnanja, trajanje in ponovitev tega ravnanja, namen ali stopnjo malomarnosti ter sodelovanje gospodarskega subjekta z zadevnim pristojnim organom v preiskavi in njegov prispevek k njej, s čimer bi zagotovil, da se spoštuje načelo sorazmernosti.
The contracting authority should also be able to exclude an economic operator where a natural or legal person assuming unlimited liability for the debts of that economic operator is bankrupt or in a similar situation of insolvency or where that natural or legal person fails to comply with its obligations to pay social security contributions or taxes, where such situations impact the financial situation of the economic operator.
Prav tako bi moralo biti javnemu naročniku omogočeno, da izključi gospodarski subjekt, kadar je fizična ali pravna oseba, ki prevzame neomejeno odgovornost za dolgove tega gospodarskega subjekta, v stečaju ali podobnem insolventnem stanju ali fizična ali pravna oseba ne izpolnjuje svojih obveznosti glede plačevanja prispevkov za socialno varnost ali davkov, kadar to vpliva na finančno stanje tega gospodarskega subjekta.
An economic operator should not be subject to a decision of exclusion when it has taken remedial measures, thus demonstrating its reliability.
Gospodarski subjekt ne bi smel biti predmet odločitve o izključitvi, če je sprejel popravne ukrepe in s tem dokazal svojo zanesljivost.
This possibility should not apply in case of the most severe criminal activities.
Ta možnost se ne bi smela uporabljati za najhujša kazniva dejanja.
In the light of the principle of proportionality, it is necessary to distinguish between the cases where a financial penalty may be imposed as an alternative to the exclusion and the cases where the gravity of the conduct of the economic operator concerned in respect of attempting to unduly obtain Union funds justifies the imposition of a financial penalty in addition to the exclusion so as to ensure a deterrent effect.
Zaradi načela sorazmernosti je treba razlikovati med primeri, pri katerih se denarna kazen lahko izreče kot alternativa izključitvi, in primeri, pri katerih se zaradi resnosti ravnanja zadevnega gospodarskega subjekta – tj. gospodarski subjekt je poskusil neupravičeno pridobiti sredstva Unije – denarna kazen naloži kot dopolnilo izključitvi z namenom zagotovitve odvračilnega učinka.
It is also necessary to define the minimum and maximum financial penalty which can be imposed by the contracting authority.
Določiti je treba tudi najmanjšo in največjo denarno kazen, ki jo lahko izreče javni naročnik.
It is important to underline that the possibility to apply administrative and/or financial penalties on a regulatory basis is independent from the possibility to apply contractual penalties, such as liquidated damages.
Poudariti je treba, da je možnost uporabe zakonsko določene upravne in/ali denarne kazni neodvisna od možnosti uporabe pogodbenih kazni, kot so pavšalne odškodnine.
The duration of exclusion should be limited in time, as is the case in Directive 2014/24/EU and in accordance with the principle of proportionality.
Trajanje izključitve bi moralo biti v skladu z Direktivo 2014/24/EU časovno omejeno in bi moralo upoštevati načelo sorazmernosti.
It is necessary to determine the commencement date and the duration of the limitation period for imposing administrative sanctions.
Določiti je treba datum začetka in trajanje zastaralnega roka za naložitev upravnih sankcij.
It is important to be able to reinforce the deterrent effect achieved by the exclusion and the financial penalty.
Omogočiti je treba okrepitev odvračilnega učinka, doseženega z izključitvijo in denarno kaznijo.
In that regard, the deterrent effect should be reinforced by the possibility to publish the information related to the exclusion and/or to the financial penalty, with full respect for the data protection requirements set out in Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] and in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].
V tem smislu bi bilo treba ta učinek okrepiti z možnostjo, da se ob doslednem spoštovanju zahtev glede varstva podatkov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6] in Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7] objavijo informacije, ki se nanašajo na izključitev in/ali denarno kazen.
This should contribute to ensuring that the conduct concerned is not repeated.
To bi moralo prispevati k zagotovitvi, da se zadevno ravnanje ne ponovi.
For reasons of legal certainty and in accordance with the principle of proportionality it should be specified in which situations a publication should not take place.
Zaradi pravne varnosti in v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti bi bilo treba določiti, v katerih okoliščinah ne bi smeli objaviti navedenih informacij.
In its assessment, the contracting authority should have regard to any recommendation of the panel.
Javni naročnik bi moral pri svojem ocenjevanju upoštevati morebitna priporočila komisije.
As far as natural persons are concerned, personal data should only be published in exceptional cases justified by the seriousness of the conduct or its impact on the Union's financial interests.
Če gre za fizične osebe, bi se osebni podatki lahko objavili le v izjemnih primerih, ki jih upravičuje resnost dejanja ali njegov vpliv na finančne interese Unije.
The information related to an exclusion or a financial penalty should only be published in the case of grave professional misconduct, fraud, a significant deficiency in complying with the main obligations of a contract financed by the budget or an irregularity.
Informacije, ki se nanašajo na izključitev ali denarno kazen, bi se lahko objavile le v primeru hude kršitve poklicnih pravil, goljufije, znatne pomanjkljivosti pri izpolnjevanju glavnih obveznosti naročila, financiranega iz proračuna, ali nepravilnosti.
The criteria for exclusion should be clearly separated from the criteria leading to a possible rejection from a given procedure.
Merila za izključitev bi morala biti jasno ločena od meril, ki so razlog za morebitno zavrnitev sodelovanja v danem postopku.
It is appropriate that different cases usually referred to as situations of conflict of interest are identified and treated distinctly.
Primerno je določiti različne situacije, običajno opredeljene kot „navzkrižje interesov“, in te situacije različno obravnavati.
The notion of a ‘conflict of interest’ should be solely used for cases where an official or an agent of a Union institution is in such a situation.
Pojem „navzkrižje interesov“ bi bilo treba uporabljati samo, če bi se v takšni situaciji znašel uradnik ali uslužbenec katere od institucij Unije.
In cases where an economic operator attempts to unduly influence a procedure or obtain confidential information, this should be treated as grave professional misconduct.
V primerih, kadar poskuša gospodarski subjekt neupravičeno vplivati na postopek ali pridobiti zaupne informacije, bi bilo treba to obravnavati kot „hudo kršitev poklicnih pravil“.
In addition, economic operators may be in a situation where they should not be selected to implement a contract because of a professional conflicting interest.
Poleg tega se lahko gospodarski subjekti znajdejo tudi v položaju, ko zaradi navzkrižnih poklicnih interesov ne bi smeli biti izbrani za izvedbo naročila.
For instance, a company should not evaluate a project in which it has participated or an auditor should not be in a position to audit accounts it has previously certified.
Na primer družba ne bi smela ocenjevati projekta, pri katerem je sodelovala, revizor pa ne bi smel revidirati računovodskih izkazov, ki jih je predhodno potrdil.
The information on the early detection of risks and on the imposition of administrative sanctions on economic operators should be centralised.
Informacije o zgodnjem odkrivanju tveganj in o naložitvi upravnih sankcij gospodarskim subjektom bi bilo treba centralizirati.
For that purpose, related information should be stored in a database set up and operated by the Commission as the owner of the centralised system.
V ta namen bi bilo treba zadevne informacije shranjevati v bazi podatkov, ki jo vzpostavi in upravlja Komisija kot lastnica centraliziranega sistema.
That system should operate in full compliance with the right to privacy and the protection of personal data.
Pri upravljanju tega sistema bi bilo treba v celoti upoštevati pravico do zasebnosti in do varstva osebnih podatkov.
While the setting up and the operation of the early detection and exclusion system should be the responsibility of the Commission, other institutions and bodies, as well as all entities implementing the budget in accordance with Articles 59 and 60 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 should participate in that system by transmitting relevant information to the Commission to ensure an early detection of risks.
Za vzpostavitev in delovanje sistema za zgodnje odkrivanje in izključitev bi morala biti odgovorna Komisija, vendar pa bi morali zaradi zagotovitve zgodnjega odkrivanja tveganj drugi organi in institucije in sploh vsi subjekti, ki izvršujejo proračun v skladu s členoma 59 in 60 Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012, Komisiji pošiljati zadevne informacije in biti na ta način vključeni v ta sistem.
The contracting authority and the panel should guarantee the right of defence of economic operators.
Javni naročnik in komisija bi morala gospodarskim subjektom zagotavljati pravico do obrambe.
The same right should be given to economic operators, in the context of an early detection, where an act envisaged by an authorising officer could adversely affect the rights of the economic operator concerned.
Enako pravico v okviru zgodnjega odkrivanja bi morali imeti gospodarski subjekti, če bi akt, ki bi ga nameraval sprejeti odredbodajalec, lahko negativno vplival na pravice zadevnega gospodarskega subjekta.
In cases of fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the Union's financial interests which are not yet subject to a final judgment, the contracting authority and the panel should be given the possibility to defer the opportunity given to the economic operator to submit its observations.
V primeru goljufije, korupcije ali katere koli druge nezakonite dejavnosti, ki škodi finančnim interesom Unije, za katero še ni bila izrečena pravnomočna sodba, bi moralo biti javnemu naročniku in komisiji omogočeno, da možnost predložitve pripomb, ki jo ima gospodarski subjekt, odložita.
Such deferral should only be justified where there are compelling legitimate grounds to preserve the confidentiality of the investigation.
Taka odložitev bi morala biti upravičena le, če za to obstajajo nujni upravičeni razlogi zaradi ohranjanja zaupnosti preiskave.