natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [102].
Skupno stališče Evropske unije z dne 21. novembra 2001, CONF-RO 43/01, str.
Romania shall ensure that no further payments of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be effected with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
4.
Article 3
Komisija med pristopnim procesom države prosilke redno predlaga t. i. skupna stališča, v katerih je ovrednoten napredek države kandidatke pri izpolnjevanju pristopnih meril; ta skupna stališča nato sprejme Svet.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Utemeljitveno poročilo, priloženo EGO 94/2004, z dne 26. avgusta 2004, str.
Romania shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
12–13.
Article 4
Člen 9(1) bilateralne investicijske pogodbe.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
Glej opombo 24.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
Točka 872 odločbe.
Romania shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
Točka 875 odločbe in naslednje.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Ta znesek je obračunan za uvoze, opravljene med 22. februarjem 2005 in 31. marcem 2009.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Glej opombo 28.
Article 5
Ta znesek je obračunan na podlagi carinskih dajatev, zaračunanih za uvoženi sladkor, in temu bi se bilo mogoče izogniti, če bi lahko tožnik naredil zalogo sladkorja pred predvidenim iztekom EGO (tj. pred 1. aprilom 2009).
This Decision is addressed to Romania.
Primerjalna vrednost temelji na zalogah v letih 2004/2005.
Done at Brussels, 30 March 2015.
Izgubljeni dobiček je izračunan za obdobje 2004–2008, in sicer za izgubo tržnih deležev brezalkoholnih pijač in drugih proizvodov, ki so vsebovali sladkor.
For the Commission
V pritožbi je navedeno, da so po preklicu spodbud EGO stroški narasli, kar je povzročilo višje cene in posledično nižje tržne deleže.
Member of the Commission
Zadeva št. 3456/3/2014, sodišče v Bukarešti.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87, and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty.
Odredba sodišča v Bukarešti, izdana v zadevi št. 9261/3/2014, oddelek IV, civilno pravo.
The two sets of Articles are in substance identical.
Zadeva št. 15755/3/2014, sodišče v Bukarešti, oddelek III, civilno pravo.
For the purposes of this Decision references to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty when appropriate.
Zadeva št. 15755/3/2014/a1, prizivno sodišče v Bukarešti, oddelek IV, civilno pravo.
The Treaty also introduced certain changes in terminology, such as the replacement of ‘Community’ by ‘Union’ and ‘common market’ by ‘internal market’.
Glej opombo 36.
The terminology of the Treaty will be used throughout this Decision.
Referenčni menjalni tečaj Evropske centralne banke dne 5. januarja 2015: 1 EUR = 4,49 RON.
OJ C 393, 7.11.2014, p.
Glej opombo 38.
27.
Referenčni menjalni tečaj Evropske centralne banke dne 9. marca 2015: 1 EUR = 4,44 RON.
ICSID Case No ARB/05/20, Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, SC European Food SA, SC Starmill SRI, SC Multipack SRL v Romania, final award of 11 December 2013.
Zadeva št. 1-14-cv-600 Viorel Micula proti vladi Romunije na zveznem okrožnem sodišču za Zvezno okrožje Kolumbija – Peticija za potrditev odločbe ICSID in vpis sodbe.
Reference exchange rate of the European Central Bank on 11 December 2013: 1 EUR = 4,45 RON.
Glej opombo 7.
The BIT entered into force on 1 April 2003.
Glej opombo 40.
See footnote 4.
Glej uvodno izjavo 39 sklepa o začetku postopka.
Reference exchange rate of the European Central Bank on 15 January 2014: 1 EUR = 4,52 RON.
Zadeva 61/79 Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato proti Denkavit italiana EU:C:1980:100.
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p.
Odločba Komisije 2008/408/ES z dne 20. novembra 2007 o državni pomoči C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06) Italije za ThyssenKrupp, Cementir in Nuova Terni Industrie Chimiche (UL L 144, 4.6.2008, str.
See recital 3.
Sklic na zadevo T-68/03 Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies EU:T:2007:253, točka 42.
See footnote 2.
Zadeva C-487/06 P British Aggregates proti Komisiji EU:C:2008:757, točki 85 in 89 ter navedena sodna praksa, in zadeva C-279/08 P Komisija proti Nizozemski (NOx) EU:C:2011:551, točka 51.
An additional RON 6028608 have been transferred on the blocked account as compensation for the execution costs.
Združene zadeve C-180/98 do C-184/98 Pavlov in drugi EU:C:2000:428, točka 74.
OJ L 357, 31.12.1994, p.
Zadeva C-170/83 Hydrotherm EU:C:1984:271, točka 11.
2.
Glej tudi zadevo T-137/02 Pollmeier Malchow proti Komisiji EU:T:2004:304, točka 50.
See also Article 2 of the Implementing Rules to Decision No 4/2000 of the EU-Romania Association Council of 10 April 2001 adopting the implementing rules for the application of the provisions on State aid referred to in Articles 64(1)(iii) and (2) pursuant to Article 64(3) of the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Romania, of the other part, and in Article 9(1)(iii) and (2) of Protocol 2 on European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) products to that Agreement (OJ L 138, 22.5.2001, p.
Zadeva C-480/09 P Acea Electrabel Produzione SpA proti Komisiji EU:C:2010:787, točke 47 do 55; zadeva C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA in drugi EU:C:2006:8, točka 112.
16).
Glej točke 935 do 936 in 943 odločbe.
Monitorul Oficial, first part, No 73 of 12 April 1993.
Zadeva C-170/83 Hydrotherm EU:C:1984:271, točka 10.
The Competition Council was and is an autonomous administrative authority in the field of competition law and State aid law with regulatory and investigative powers, similar to the European Commission in the field of competition and State aid law.
Zadeva C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA in drugi EU:C:2006:8, točka 112.
The Competition Office was a specialised authority subordinate to the government.
Zadeva C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA in drugi EU:C:2006:8, točka 114.
The main responsibilities of the Office were: (i) to carry out investigations and to survey the effective enforcement of legal provisions and the decisions of the Competition Council; (ii) to supervise the setting of prices by public entities and public companies; and (iii) to ensure transparency of State aid, and to monitor and report State aid expenditure.
Glej uvodni izjavi 87 in 88.
By Article 1 of the implementing rules to Decision No 4/2000 the EU-Romania Association Council designated the Competition Council and Competition Office as the Romanian entities responsible for surveying and assessing the compatibility of State aid with the 1995 Europe Agreement.
Zadeva C-39/94 SFEI in drugi EU:C:1996:285, točka 60; zadeva C-342/96 Španija proti Komisiji EU:C:1999:210, točka 41.
Civil Decision No 26; see Award, paragraph 219.
Točka 917 odločbe.
See Award, paragraph 224.
Točka 928 odločbe.
European Union Common Position of 21 November 2001, CONF-RO 43/01, p.
Točka 953 odločbe.
4.
Za opis zneskov, dolgovanih v skladu z arbitražno odločbo, glej uvodno izjavo 27.
During the accession process of an applicant country, the Commission regularly proposes and the Council adopts so-called common positions, in which the progress of the candidate country towards compliance with the accession criteria is evaluated.
Sodišče je sklenilo, da so bila s preklicem spodbud iz EGO 24 kršena legitimna pričakovanja tožnikov, preden je sploh obravnavalo razumnost ali preglednost ravnanja Romunije (odločba, točki 725, 726; razumnost in preglednost sta bili obravnavani šele v točki 727 in naslednjih oziroma točki 837 in naslednjih).
Article 9(1) of the BIT.
Odločba, točke 953, 961, 971, 984, 1016, 1020, 1136.
Award, paragraph 725.
Združene zadeve 106/87 do 120/87 Asteris EU:C:1988:457.
Award, paragraph 827.
Združene zadeve 106/87 do 120/87 Asteris EU:C:1988:457, točka 23.
See footnote 24.
Glej Sklep Komisije z dne 16. junija 2004 o nizozemski pomoči v korist družbe Akzo-Nobel za zmanjšanje obsega prevozov klora (zadeva N 304/2003), povzetek v UL C 81, 2.4.2005, str.
Award, paragraph 872.
4; glej tudi Sklep Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2006 o nizozemski pomoči za preselitev podjetja za razgradnjo vozil Steenbergen (zadeva N 575/05), povzetek v UL C 80, 13.4.2007, str.
Award, paragraphs 875 et seq.
1.
This amount is calculated for imports made during 22 February 2005 and 31 March 2009.
Iz enakih razlogov bi Komisija za neveljavne štela tudi bilateralne investicijske pogodbe med državami članicami EU, navedene v opombi 53 zahtevka, ki so osnova arbitražnega postopka.
See footnote 28.
Glej tudi delovni dokument služb Komisije z dne 15. aprila 2013 o prostem pretoku kapitala v EU, SWD(2013) 146 final, strani 11 in 14; delovni dokument služb Komisije z dne 18. marca 2014 o prostem pretoku kapitala v EU, SWD(2014) 115 final, stran 12; in European Commission, Monitoring activities and analysis, Bilateral Investment Treaties between EU Member States (intra-EU BITs) 2012; na voljo na povezavi: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/capital/analysis/monitoring_activities_and_analysis/index_en.htm.
The claimants asked for compensation for the increased cost of PET.
Sklep z dne 28. aprila 2005 v združenih zadevah C-346/03 in C-529/03 Atzori ECLI:EU:C:2005:256, točka 198.
However, the Tribunal rejected this claims on the basis that the claimants had never in fact benefited from the Raw Materials Facility with respect to PET imports.
Zadeva T-384/08 Elliniki Nafpigokataskevastiki AE Chartofylakeiou proti Komisiji EU:T:2011:650 in zadeva T-565/08 Corsica Ferries proti Komisiji EU:T:2012:415, točke 23, 114 in 120 do 131.
This amount is calculated on the basis of custom duties charged on imported sugar and that would have been avoided, if the claimant had had the opportunity to stockpile sugar before the envisaged expiry of the EGO (i.e. 1 April 2009).
Po analogiji glej tudi zadevo C-111/10 Komisija proti Svetu EU:C:2013:785, točka 44.
The benchmark is based on stockpiles in 2004/2005.
Zadeva C-119/05 Lucchini EU:C:2007:434, točka 59.
Lost profits are calculated over the period 2004-2008 for loss of market shares of soft drinks and other products that did contain sugar.
Zadeva C-280/00 Altmark Trans EU:C:2003:415, točka 84.
The claim is that after the revocation of the EGO incentives, the costs increased leading to higher prices and thus to lower market shares.
Zadeva T-351/02 Deutsche Bahn AG proti Komisiji EU:T:2006:104, točka 101.
Case No 3456/3/2014, Bucharest Tribunal.
Zadeva 730/79 Phillip Morris EU:C:1980:209, točka 11.
Order issued by Bucharest Tribunal in Case No 9261/3/2014, Section IV Civil.
Združene zadeve T-298/97, T-312/97 itd. Alzetta EU:T:2000:151, točka 80.
Case No 15755/3/2014, Bucharest Tribunal, Section III Civil.
Zadeva T-288/97 Friuli Venezia Giulia EU:T:2001:115, točka 41.
Case No 15755/3/2014/a1, Bucharest Court of Appeal, Section IV Civil.
Uredba (EU) št. 1219/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2012 o prehodnih dogovorih za dvostranske sporazume o naložbah med državami članicami in tretjimi državami (UL L 351, 20.12.2012, str.
See footnote 36.
40).
Reference exchange rate of the European Central Bank on 5 January 2015: 1 EUR = 4,49 RON.
Člen 3(1)(e) Pogodbe.
See footnote 38.
Zadeva C-129/12 Magdeburger Mühlenwerke EU:C:2013:200, točka 40.
Reference exchange rate of the European Central Bank on 9 March 2015: 1 EUR = 4,44 RON.
Angleški prevod prvotne določbe, ki opredeljuje olajšavo za surovine (ki je spodbuda za naložbe, katere preklic je povzročil, da je bila tožnikom z odločbo dodeljena odškodnina), je na voljo v točki 148 odločbe.
Case No 1-14-cv-600 Viorel Micula v Government of Romania in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia — Petition to confirm ICSID award and enter judgment.
V skladu s tem prevodom člen 6(1)(b) določa naslednje: „Privately held companies, Romanian legal entities, as well as small or family business, authorised pursuant to the Decree-Law no.
See footnote 7.
54/1990 concerning the organisation and operation of free initiative-based economic activities that are headquartered and conduct business within the disadvantaged region, will be granted the following advantages for their new investments in the these regions: […] refunds of customs duties on raw materials, spare parts and/or components necessary of achieving the investor’s own production in that region.
See footnote 40.
The refunds will be made based on the approval by the regional development agencies of the companies’ production sales documents.
See opening decision, recital 39.
The funds necessary for the refund of the customs duties will be provided to the Agency for Regional Development from the Regional development Fund.
Case 61/79 Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato v Denkavit italiana EU:C:1980:100.
In case of unprivileged regions belonging to two or more administrative-territorial units, the funds necessary for the refund of the customs duties will be provided by the National Agency for Regional Development from the National Development Fund [the ‚Raw Materials Incentive‘ or ‚Raw Materials Facility‘]. “
Commission Decision 2008/408/EC of 20 November 2007 on the State aid C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06) implemented by Italy in favour of ThyssenKrupp, Cementir and Nuove Terni Industrie Chimiche (OJ L 144, 4.6.2008, p.
V Aktu o pristopu so navedene naslednje tri kategorije obstoječe pomoči:ukrepi pomoči, ki so se začeli izvajati pred 10. decembrom 1994,ukrepi pomoči, ki so našteti v Dodatku k tej prilogi,ukrepi pomoči, ki jih je pred dnem pristopa ocenil organ za nadzor državnih pomoči nove države članice, in ugotovil, da so združljivi s pravnim redom EU, ter jim Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz drugega odstavka ni nasprotovala zaradi resnih dvomov glede združljivosti ukrepa s skupnim trgom.Nobena od teh treh kategorij ne vključuje sklepa o izvrševanju odločbe.
37).
Tudi če bi se štelo, da izvajanje odločbe zgolj ponovno uvaja pravice tožnikov v skladu z EGO 24, kot če ustrezne spodbude iz EGO 24 ne bi bile ukinjene pred načrtovanim iztekom, bi se morala ta retroaktivna ponovna uvedba od pristopa Romunije k Uniji še vedno obravnavati kot „nova pomoč“.
Referring to Case T-68/03 Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies, EU:T:2007:253, paragraph 42.
Glej tudi združeni zadevi T-80/06 in T-182/09 Budapesti Erömü EU:T:2012:65, točka 54.
Case C-487/06 P British Aggregates v Commission EU:C:2008:757, paragraphs 85 and 89 and the case-law cited, and Case C-279/08 P Commission v Netherlands (NOx) EU:C:2011:551, paragraph 51.
Zadeva T-68/03 Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies AE proti Komisiji EU:T:2007:253, točka 34.
Joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavlov and Others EU:C:2000:428, paragraph 74.
Zadeva C-225/91 Matra proti Komisiji EU:C:1993:239, točka 41.
Case C-170/83 Hydrotherm EU:C:1984:271, paragraph 11.
Smernice o državni regionalni pomoči za 2007–2013 (UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str.
See also Case T-137/02 Pollmeier Malchow v Commission EU:T:2004:304, paragraph 50.
13).
Case C-480/09 P Acea Electrabel Produzione SpA v Commission EU:C:2010:787 paragraphs 47 to 55; Case C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA and Others EU:C:2006:8, paragraph 112.
RAG 2007, točka 76.
See Award, paragraphs 935-936 and 943.
Sklep Komisije N 2/07, povzetek v UL C 73, 30.3.2007, str.
Case C-170/83 Hydrotherm EU:C:1984:271, paragraph 10.
15.
Case C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA and Others EU:C:2006:8, paragraph 112.
Sklep Komisije SA 38364, povzetek v UL C 233, 18.7.2014, str.
See recitals 87 and 88.
Zadeva C-70/72 Komisija proti Nemčiji EU:C:1973:87, točka 13.
Award, paragraph 917.
Zadeva C-75/97 Belgija proti Komisiji EU:C:1999:311, točki 64 do 65.
Award, paragraph 928.
Zadeva C-148/04 Unicredito Italiano EU:C:2005:774, točke 104 do 111.
Award, paragraph 953.
Sodba v zadevi C-217/06 Komisija proti Italiji EU:C:2007:580, točka 23, in navedena sodna praksa.
See recital 27 for the description of the amounts due under the arbitration award.
Zadeva C-5/89 Komisija proti Nemčiji EU:C:1990:320, točka 14.
The Tribunal concluded that the revocation of the EGO 24 incentives violated the claimants’ legitimate expectations before it even considered the reasonableness or transparency of Romania’s actions (Award, paragraphs 725, 726; reasonableness and transparency were only considered in paragraphs 727 et seq. and 837 et seq., respectively).
Zadeva ICSID št.
There is thus no basis for maintaining, as the claimants suggest, that the Tribunal’s finding of a breach of the BIT was conditioned on the unreasonableness of keeping in place the investors’ obligations under EGO 24 or on the insufficient transparency of Romania’s actions.
ARB/05/20, Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, SC European Food SA, SC Starmill SRL, SC Multipack SRL proti Romuniji, končna odločba z dne 11. decembra 2013.
Award, paragraphs 953, 961, 971, 984, 1016, 1020, 1136.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 140, 30.4.2004, str.
Joined Cases 106/87 to 120/87 Asteris EU:C:1988:457, paragraph 23.
Sklep Komisije o začetku postopka je bil v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [10] objavljen 7. novembra 2014.
See Commission Decision of 16 June 2004 on Dutch aid in favour of Akzo-Nobel in order to minimise chlorine transports (Case N 304/2003), summary notice in OJ C 81, 2.4.2005, p.
Komisija je v sklepu pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe.
4; see also Commission Decision of 20 December 2006 on Dutch aid for relocation of car dismantling company Steenbergen (Case N 575/05), summary notice in OJ C 80, 13.4.2007, p.
Romunija je predložila pripombe na sklep o začetku postopka 26. novembra 2014.
1.
Tožniki so kot zainteresirana stranka predložili pripombe 8. decembra 2014, potem ko jim je Komisija zavrnila prošnjo za podaljšanje roka, ki so ga imeli na voljo za predložitev pripomb.
See, further, Commission Staff Working Document of 3 February 2012 on capital movements and investments in the EU — Commission Services’ Paper on Market Monitoring, SWD(2012)6 final, page 13.
Preklic spodbud iz EGO 24 je začel veljati 22. februarja 2005.
See also, Commission Staff Working Document of 15 April 2013 on the free movement of capital in the EU, SWD(2013)146 final, pages 11 and 14; Commission Staff Working Document of 18 March 2014 on the free movement of capital in the EU, SWD(2014)115 final, page 12; and European Commission, Monitoring activities and analysis, Bilateral Investment Treaties between EU Member States (intra-EU BITs) 2012; available at: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/capital/analysis/monitoring_activities_and_analysis/index_en.htm
V poročilu, priloženemu aktu, ki razveljavlja EGO 24, kakor je bil spremenjen z EGO 75, je razloženo: „Zaradi izpolnjevanja meril, opredeljenih v pravilih Skupnosti o državni pomoči, in tudi zaradi dokončanja pogajanj iz poglavja št. 6 – Konkurenčna politika je treba iz nacionalne zakonodaje izločiti vse oblike državne pomoči, ki niso združljive s pravnim redom Skupnosti na tem področju, zato je v zvezi s tem predlagana razveljavitev […] določb točke (b), točke (d) in točke (e) odstavka (1) člena 6 izrednega odloka vlade št. 24/1998 o prikrajšanih območjih […]“ [21].
Case T-384/08 Elliniki Nafpigokataskevastiki AE Chartofylakeiou v Commission EU:T:2011:650, and Case T-565/08 Corsica Ferries v Commission EU:T:2012:415, paragraphs 23, 114 and 120 to 131.
Vendar so med postopkom leta 2009 svoj zahtevek delno umaknili in namesto tega zahtevali nadomestilo za škodo, ki jim je nastala zaradi preklica spodbud iz EGO 24.
See also, by analogy, Case C-111/10 Commission v Council EU:C:2013:785, paragraph 44.
Tožniki so Romuniji očitali, da jim je s preklicem spodbud kršila legitimna pričakovanja, da bodo spodbude na voljo do 1. aprila 2009.
Case C-119/05 Lucchini EU:C:2007:434, paragraph 59.
Po mnenju tožnikov je torej Romunija kršila svojo obveznost poštene in pravične obravnave, do katere so bili v skladu s členom 2(3) bilateralne investicijske pogodbe kot švedski vlagatelji upravičeni.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans EU:C:2003:415, paragraph 84.
Sodišče je v odločbi z dne 11. decembra 2013 ugotovilo, da je Romunija s preklicem spodbud iz EGO 24 „kršila legitimna pričakovanja tožnikov glede razpoložljivosti spodbud iz EGO 24“ do 1. aprila 2009 [23].
Case T-351/02 Deutsche Bahn AG v Commission EU:T:2006:104, paragraph 101.
Sodišče je poleg tega ugotovilo, da je bila razen ohranitve obveznosti vlagateljev iz EGO 24 po preklicu zadevnih spodbud „razveljavitev spodbud s strani Romunije ustrezen ukrep za izvajanje racionalne politike“ [24].
Case 730/79 Phillip Morris EU:C:1980:209, paragraph 11.
Romunija se je 30. septembra 2014 odločila za pritožbo zoper sklep sodišča v Bukarešti z dne 23. septembra 2014 [36].
Joined Cases T-298/97, T-312/97 etc.
Sodišče v Bukarešti je 13. oktobra 2014 zavrnilo zahtevo za predložitev vprašanj v predhodno odločanje SEU na podlagi člena 267 Pogodbe.
Alzetta EU:T:2000:151, paragraph 80.
Sodišče v Bukarešti je 24. novembra 2014 zavrnilo tudi tožbo Romunije zoper izvršitev odredbe z dne 24. marca 2014, vključno s prošnjo za začasne ukrepe z dne 17. oktobra 2014.
Case T-288/97 Friulia Venezia Giulia EU:T:2001:115, paragraph 41.
Romunija se je 14. januarja 2015 pritožila zoper sklep sodišča v Bukarešti [37].
Regulation (EU) No 1219/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countries (OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p.
Prizivno sodišče v Bukarešti je 24. februarja 2015 razveljavilo sklep sodišča v Bukarešti z dne 23. septembra 2014 in začasno prekinilo prisilno izvršitev do izida pritožbenega postopka zoper sklep sodišča v Bukarešti z dne 24. novembra 2014.
40).
Komisija se je odločila zaprositi za dovoljenje za posredovanje v teh pritožbenih postopkih na podlagi člena 23a(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999.
Article 3(1)(e) of the Treaty.
Povedano natančneje, z izvedbo ali izvršitvijo odločbe se dejansko povrnejo carinske dajatve, zaračunane za uvoženi sladkor in druge surovine med 22. februarjem 2005 in 31. marcem 2009, ter carinske dajatve, ki so bile zaračunane za uvoženi sladkor in bi se jim tožniki izognili, če bi imeli priložnost ustvariti zaloge sladkorja pred načrtovanim iztekom olajšav iz EGO 24 31. marca 2009.
Case C-129/12 Magdeburger Mühlenwerke EU:C:2013:200, paragraph 40.
Poleg tega je sodišče, da bi se tožnikom zagotovil popoln izkoristek zneska, ki ustreza znesku ukinjene sheme, in da bi se jim ponovno zagotovil položaj, v katerem bi „po vsej verjetnosti“ bili, dodelilo tudi obresti ter nadomestilo za domnevno izgubljeno priložnost in izgubljeni dobiček [62].
An English-language translation of the initial provision providing for the Raw Materials Facility (which is the investment incentive the revocation of which led to damages being awarded to the applicants under the Award) can be found at paragraph 148 of the Award.
Multipack (17. maja 2002) niso tožnikom podelili brezpogojne pravice za pridobitev olajšave za surovine do 1. aprila 2009.