natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The adoption of measures under Article 77(2)(e) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), with a view to ensuring the absence of any controls on persons crossing internal borders, forms part of the Union’s objective of establishing an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of persons is ensured, as set out in Article 26(2) TFEU.
Sprejemanje ukrepov v skladu s členom 77(2)(e) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), s katerimi se zagotavlja, da se osebe pri prehajanju notranjih meja ne kontrolirajo, predstavlja del cilja Unije, da uvede območje brez notranjih meja, na katerem je zagotovljeno prosto gibanje oseb, kakor to določa člen 26(2) PDEU.
In accordance with Article 67(2) TFEU, the creation of an area in which persons may move freely is to be flanked by other measures.
V skladu s členom 67(2) PDEU ustanovitev območja, v katerem se lahko osebe svobodno gibljejo, spremljajo tudi drugi ukrepi.
The common policy on the crossing of external borders, as provided for by Article 77(1)(b) TFEU, is such a measure.
Takšen ukrep je skupna politika prehajanja zunanjih meja, kakor je določeno v členu 77(1)(b) PDEU.
Common measures on the crossing of internal borders by persons and border control at external borders should reflect the Schengen acquis incorporated in the Union framework, and in particular the relevant provisions of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders [4] and the Common Manual [5].
Skupni ukrepi glede oseb, ki prehajajo notranje meje, in nadzor meje na zunanjih mejah bi morali odražati schengenski pravni red, vključen v okvir Unije in zlasti ustrezne določbe Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah [4] in Skupni priročnik [5].
Common rules on the movement of persons across borders neither call into question nor affect the rights of free movement enjoyed by Union citizens and members of their families and by third-country nationals and members of their families who, under agreements between the Union and its Member States, on the one hand, and those third countries, on the other hand, enjoy rights of free movement equivalent to those of Union citizens.
Skupna pravila glede gibanja oseb prek meja ne povzročajo dvoma in ne posegajo v pravico do prostega gibanja, ki jo imajo državljani Unije in člani njihovih družin ter državljani tretjih držav in člani njihovih družin, ki imajo na podlagi sporazumov med Unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in temi tretjimi državami na drugi strani pravico do prostega gibanja, ki je enakovredna pravici državljanov Unije.
Border control should help to combat illegal immigration and trafficking in human beings and to prevent any threat to the Member States’ internal security, public policy, public health and international relations.
Nadzor meje bi moral pomagati v boju proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju in trgovini z ljudmi in preprečiti katero koli grožnjo notranji varnosti, javnemu redu, javnemu zdravju in mednarodnim odnosom držav članic.
Border checks should be carried out in such a way as to fully respect human dignity.
Mejne kontrole bi bilo treba izvajati na način, pri katerem se v celoti spoštuje človeško dostojanstvo.
Border control should be carried out in a professional and respectful manner and be proportionate to the objectives pursued.
Nadzor meje bi bilo treba izvajati na strokoven in spoštljiv način ter sorazmerno s cilji, ki se zasledujejo.
Border control comprises not only checks on persons at border crossing points and surveillance between those border crossing points, but also an analysis of the risks for internal security and of the threats that may affect the security of external borders.
Nadzor meje ne zajema le kontrole oseb na mejnih prehodih in varovanja med temi mejnimi prehodi, temveč tudi analizo tveganj za notranjo varnost in analizo groženj, ki bi lahko vplivale na varnost zunanjih meja.
It is therefore necessary to set out the conditions, criteria and detailed rules governing checks at border crossing points and surveillance at the border, including checks in the Schengen Information System (SIS).
Zato je potrebno določiti pogoje, merila in podrobna pravila, ki urejajo kontrolo na mejnih prehodih in varovanje meje, vključno s preverjanjem podatkov v schengenskem informacijskem sistemu (SIS).
It is necessary to provide for rules dealing with the calculation of the authorised length of short-term stays in the Union.
Potrebno je določiti pravila o izračunavanju dovoljenega trajanja kratkoročnega bivanja v Uniji.
Clear, simple and harmonised rules in all legal acts dealing with this issue would benefit both travellers as well as border and visa authorities.
Jasna, preprosta in harmonizirana pravila v vseh pravnih aktih, ki urejajo to vprašanje, bi koristila tako potnikom kot tudi mejnim organom in organom, pristojnim za izdajo vizumov.
Since only a verification of fingerprints can confirm with certainty that a person wishing to enter the Schengen area is the person to whom the visa has been issued, provision should be made for the use at external borders of the Visa Information System (VIS) provided for under Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6].
Ker lahko le preverjanje prstnih odtisov zanesljivo potrdi, da je oseba, ki želi vstopiti na schengensko območje, tista, ki ji je bil izdan vizum, bi bilo treba na zunanjih mejah zagotoviti uporabo vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS), določenega v Uredbi (ES) št. 767/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6].
In order to verify whether the entry conditions for third-country nationals laid down in this Regulation are fulfilled and to manage their tasks successfully, border guards should use all necessary information available, including data which may be consulted in the VIS.
Da bi preverili, ali so pogoji za vstop državljanov tretjih držav iz te uredbe izpolnjeni, in da bi svoje naloge opravljali uspešno, bi morali mejni policisti uporabiti vse potrebne informacije, ki so dostopne, vključno s podatki, ki bi jih lahko našli v VIS.
However, given the potential impact of such searches on waiting times at border crossing points, it should be possible, for a transitional period by way of derogation and in strictly defined circumstances, to consult the VIS without a systematic verification of fingerprints.
Vendar bi glede na morebitni vpliv tovrstnih iskanj na čakalne dobe na mejnih prehodih moralo biti mogoče, za prehodno obdobje z odstopanjem in v strogo opredeljenih okoliščinah, iskanje podatkov v VIS brez sistematičnega preverjanja prstnih odtisov.
It should be possible to have checks at external borders relaxed in the event of exceptional and unforeseeable circumstances in order to avoid excessive waiting time at border crossing points.
Da bi se izognili predolgim čakalnim dobam na mejnih prehodih, bi moralo biti mogoče delno opustiti mejne kontrole na zunanjih mejah v primeru izjemnih in nepredvidljivih okoliščin.
In order to reduce the waiting times of persons enjoying the Union right of free movement, separate lanes, indicated by uniform signs in all Member States, should, where circumstances allow, be provided at border crossing points.
Kjer okoliščine to dopuščajo, bi morale v vseh državah članicah na mejnih prehodih obstajati ločene steze, označene z enotnimi oznakami, da se zmanjšajo čakalne dobe oseb, ki uživajo pravico Unije do prostega gibanja.
Separate lanes should be provided in international airports.
Na mednarodnih letališčih bi bilo treba zagotoviti ločene steze.
Where it is deemed appropriate and if local circumstances so allow, Member States should consider installing separate lanes at sea and land border crossing points.
Kadar se zdi primerno in če to dopuščajo lokalne okoliščine, bi morale države članice razmisliti o ureditvi ločenih stez na pomorskih in kopenskih mejnih prehodih.
Member States should ensure that control procedures at external borders do not constitute a major barrier to trade and social and cultural interchange.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da postopki nadzora zunanjih meja ne predstavljajo prevelike ovire trgovini ter družbeni in kulturni izmenjavi.
To that end, they should deploy appropriate numbers of staff and resources.
V ta namen bi morale razporediti ustrezno število osebja in sredstev.
Member States should designate the national service or services responsible for border-control tasks in accordance with their national law.
Države članice bi morale v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom imenovati nacionalno službo ali službe, odgovorne za naloge nadzora meje.
Where more than one service is responsible in the same Member State, there should be close and constant cooperation between them.
Kadar je v isti državi članici pristojnih več služb, bi slednje morale med seboj tesno in stalno sodelovati.
Operational cooperation and assistance between Member States in relation to border control should be managed and coordinated by the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States (‘the Agency’), established by Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 [7].
Operativno sodelovanje in pomoč med državami članicami v zvezi z nadzorom meje bi morala urejati in voditi Evropska agencija za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic (v nadaljnjem besedilu: agencija), ustanovljena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2007/2004 [7].
This Regulation is without prejudice to checks carried out under general police powers and security checks on persons identical to those carried out for domestic flights, to the possibilities for Member States to carry out exceptional checks on baggage in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 3925/91 [8], and to national law on carrying travel or identity documents or to the requirement that persons notify the authorities of their presence on the territory of the Member State in question.
Ta uredba ne posega v opravljanje kontrole v skladu s splošnimi pristojnostmi policije in varnostne osebne kontrole, povsem enake tisti, ki se izvaja pri notranjih letih, prav tako ne posega v možnosti držav članic, da izvajajo izredno kontrolo prtljage v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 3925/91 [8], kakor tudi ne posega v nacionalno pravo o nošenju potnih ali osebnih listin ali v obveznost, da morajo osebe uradno obvestiti pristojne organe, da se nahajajo na območju določene države članice.
In an area where persons may move freely, the reintroduction of border control at internal borders should remain an exception.
Ponovna uvedba nadzora na notranjih mejah bi se na območju, kjer se osebe lahko prosto gibljejo, še naprej morala uporabljati le izjemoma.
Border control should not be carried out or formalities imposed solely because such a border is crossed.
Nadzor meje ali formalnosti se ne bi smeli izvajati zgolj zaradi prehoda meje.
Given the impact that such measures of last resort may have on all persons having the right to move within the area without internal border control, the conditions and procedures for reintroducing such measures should be provided for, in order to ensure that they are exceptional and that the principle of proportionality is respected.
Glede na učinek, ki bi ga takšni skrajni ukrepi lahko imeli na vse osebe, ki imajo pravico do prostega gibanja na območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah, bi bilo treba določiti pogoje in postopke za ponovno uvedbo takšnih ukrepov, da se zagotovita njihova izredna narava in upoštevanje načela sorazmernosti.
In accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, a derogation from the fundamental principle of free movement of persons must be interpreted strictly and the concept of public policy presupposes the existence of a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije je treba odstopanje od temeljnega načela prostega gibanja oseb razlagati ozko, pojem javnega reda pa predvideva obstoj resnične, sedanje in dovolj resne grožnje, ki vpliva na enega od temeljnih interesov družbe.
Based on the experience gathered with respect to the functioning of the area without internal border control and in order to help ensure the consistent implementation of the Schengen acquis, the Commission may draw up guidelines on the reintroduction of internal border control in cases which require such a measure on a temporary basis and in cases where immediate action is needed.
Na podlagi doslej pridobljenih izkušenj v zvezi z delovanjem območja brez nadzora na notranjih mejah in da bi pripomogla k zagotavljanju usklajenega izvajanja schengenskega pravnega reda, lahko Komisija oblikuje smernice za ponovno uvedbo nadzora na notranjih mejah v primerih, ko je takšen ukrep potreben na začasni osnovi, in v primerih, ko je potrebno takojšnje ukrepanje.
Where serious deficiencies in the carrying out of external border control are identified in an evaluation report drawn up pursuant to Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 [9] and with a view to ensuring compliance with the recommendations adopted pursuant to that Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to recommend that the evaluated Member State take specific measures, such as deploying European border guard teams, submitting strategic plans or, as a last resort and taking into account the seriousness of the situation, closing a specific border crossing-point.
Kadar so v ocenjevalnem poročilu, pripravljenem v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 1053/2013 [9], ugotovljene resne pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju nadzora na zunanjih mejah in da se zagotovi upoštevanje priporočil, sprejetih na podlagi navedene uredbe, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila, da ocenjeni državi članici priporoči, naj sprejme posebne ukrepe, kot so razporeditev skupin Evropskih mejnih policistov, predložitev strateških načrtov oziroma – kot skrajni ukrep in ob upoštevanju resnosti razmer – zaprtje določenega mejnega prehoda.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10].
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [10].
In the light of Article 2(2)(b)(iii) of that Regulation, the examination procedure is applicable.
V luči člena 2(2)(b)(iii) navedene uredbe se uporablja postopek pregleda.
Before any recommendation on the temporary reintroduction of border control at certain internal borders is adopted, the possibility of resorting to measures aiming to address the underlying situation, including assistance by Union bodies, offices or agencies, such as the Agency or the European Police Office (‘Europol’), established by Council Decision 2009/371/JHA [11], and technical or financial support measures at national level, Union level, or both, should be fully explored in a timely manner.
Preden se sprejme priporočilo o začasni ponovni uvedbi nadzora na določenih notranjih mejah, bi bilo treba pravočasno v celoti preučiti vse možnosti uporabe ukrepov za reševanje nastalih razmer, tudi prek pomoči organov, uradov in agencij Unije, kot sta agencija ali Evropski policijski urad (Europol), ustanovljen s Sklepom Sveta 2009/371/PNZ [11], ter ukrepov tehnične in finančne pomoči na nacionalni ravni, ravni Unije ali na obeh ravneh.
The Commission should have the possibility to adopt immediately applicable implementing acts where, in duly justified cases relating to the need to prolong border control at internal borders, imperative grounds of urgency so require.
Komisija bi morala imeti možnost sprejeti izvedbene akte, ki se začnejo uporabljati takoj, kadar je to potrebno iz izredno nujnih razlogov v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih v zvezi s potrebo po podaljšanju nadzora na notranjih mejah.
Since the objective of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 and its successive amendments, namely the establishment of rules applicable to the movement of persons across borders, could not be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but could rather be better achieved at Union level, the Union was able to adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
Ker cilja Uredbe (ES) št. 562/2006 in njenih naknadnih sprememb, in sicer uvedbe pravil, ki se uporabljajo pri prehajanju oseb čez meje, države članice niso mogle zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se je lažje dosegel na ravni Unije, je lahko Unija sprejela ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, that Regulation and its successive amendments did not go beyond what was necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena navedena uredba in njene naknadne spremembe niso presegale tistega, kar je bilo potrebno za dosego navedenega cilja.
The power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the adoption of additional measures governing surveillance as well as amendments to the Annexes to this Regulation.
Na Komisijo bi bilo treba prenesti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 PDEU sprejme akte v zvezi s sprejemanjem dodatnih ukrepov, ki urejajo varovanje, ter spremembe prilog k tej uredbi.
It should be applied in accordance with the Member States’ obligations as regards international protection and non-refoulement.
Uporabljati bi jo bilo treba v skladu z obveznostmi držav članic glede mednarodne zaščite in nevračanja.
By way of derogation from Article 355 TFEU, the only territories of France and the Netherlands to which this Regulation applies are those in Europe.
Z odstopanjem od člena 355 PDEU se ta uredba uporablja le za tista ozemlja Francije in Nizozemske, ki so v Evropi.
It does not affect the specific arrangements applied in Ceuta and Melilla, as defined in the Agreement on the Accession of the Kingdom of Spain to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 [12].
Ne vpliva na posebne dogovore za Ceuto in Melillo, kakor je določeno v Sporazumu o pristopu Kraljevine Španije h Konvenciji o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 [12].
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the Position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola št. 22 o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in PDEU, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [13] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC [14].
Ta uredba za Islandijo in Norveško predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije ter Republiko Islandijo in Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [13], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES [14].
As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [15] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [16].
Ta uredba za Švico predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [15], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES, v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/146/ES [16].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [17] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2011/350/EU [18].
Ta uredba za Lihtenštajn predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Protokola, podpisanega med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [17], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2011/350/EU [18].
This Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC [19]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta uredba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri katerem Združeno kraljestvo v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES [19] ne sodeluje; Združeno kraljestvo torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanj ni zavezujoča in se v njem ne uporablja.
This Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC [20]; Ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Ta uredba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, pri katerem Irska v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES [20] ne sodeluje.
As regards Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania, the first paragraph of Article 1, Article 6(5)(a), Title III, and the provisions of Title II and the annexes thereto referring to the SIS and to the VIS constitute provisions building upon, or otherwise related to, the Schengen acquis within, respectively, the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession, Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession and Article 4(2) of the 2011 Act of Accession,
Irska torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Kar zadeva Bolgarijo, Hrvaško, Ciper in Romunijo, prvi odstavek člena 1, člen 6(5)(a), naslov III ter določbe naslova II in priloge, ki se nanašajo na SIS in VIS, pomenijo nadgradnjo schengenskega pravnega reda oziroma so z njim kako drugače povezane v smislu člena 3(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003, člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005 oziroma člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2011 –
GENERAL PROVISIONS
NASLOV I
Subject matter and principles
Člen 1
This Regulation provides for the absence of border control of persons crossing the internal borders between the Member States of the Union.
Predmet urejanja in načela