natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The date of entry into force of the Protocol will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.
Protokol je bil objavljen v UL L 47, 20.2.2015, str.
Council Decision (EU) 2016/1230
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/1230
establishing that no effective action has been taken by Portugal in response to the Council recommendation of 21 June 2013
o ugotovitvi, da Portugalska v odgovor na priporočilo Sveta z dne 21. junija 2013 ni sprejela učinkovitih ukrepov
The Stability and Growth Pact includes Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 [1], which was adopted in order to further the prompt correction of excessive general government deficits.
Pakt za stabilnost in rast vključuje Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97 [1], sprejeto z namenom pospešitve zmanjšanja čezmernih javnofinančnih primanjkljajev.
The Council, acting upon a recommendation by the Commission, decided on 2 December 2009, in accordance with Article 126(6) of the Treaty, that an excessive deficit existed in Portugal and issued a recommendation to correct the excessive deficit by 2013 at the latest, in accordance with Article 126(7) of the Treaty and Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 [2].
Svet je v skladu s členom 126(6) Pogodbe na podlagi priporočila Komisije 2. decembra 2009 sklenil, da na Portugalskem obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj, ter v skladu s členom 126(7) Pogodbe in členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97 izdal priporočilo za njegovo ustrezno zmanjšanje najpozneje do leta 2013 [2].
Following the request by the Portuguese authorities for financial assistance from the Union, the Member States whose currency is the euro and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Council granted Union financial assistance to Portugal [3].
Svet je Portugalski po prošnji njenih organov za finančno pomoč Unije, držav članic, katerih valuta je euro, in Mednarodnega denarnega sklada (MDS) odobril finančno pomoč Unije [3].
Since then, the Council has issued two recommendations to Portugal (on 9 October 2012 and 21 June 2013) on the basis of Article 126(7) of the Treaty, which extended the deadline for correcting the excessive deficit to 2014 and 2015 respectively.
Poleg tega je bilo Portugalski priporočeno, da nadaljuje reforme upravljanja javnih financ z revizijo zakona o proračunskem okviru do konca leta 2013, da bi dodatno izboljšala proračunske postopke in načela proračunskega upravljanja, odgovornosti, preglednosti in poenostavitve, ter si še naprej prizadeva za omejitev pogojnih obveznosti, povezanih s podjetji v državni lasti in javno-zasebnimi partnerstvi.
In both recommendations, the Council considered that Portugal had taken effective action, but unexpected adverse economic events with major unfavourable consequences for government finances had occurred.
V skladu s posodobitvijo gospodarskih obetov za Portugalsko, ki so jo službe Komisije pripravile maja 2013 in na kateri je temeljilo priporočilo Sveta z dne 21. junija 2013, naj bi se portugalsko gospodarstvo v letu 2013 skrčilo za 2,3 %, nato pa naj bi v naslednjih dveh letih zraslo za 0,6 % oziroma 1,5 %.
Specifically, in order to bring the headline government deficit below the 3 %-of-GDP reference value by 2015 in a credible and sustainable manner, Portugal was recommended to: (a) bring the headline deficit to 5,5 % of GDP in 2013, 4,0 % of GDP in 2014 and 2,5 % of GDP in 2015, which was deemed consistent with an improvement in the structural balance of 0,6 % of GDP in 2013, 1,4 % of GDP in 2014 and 0,5 % of GDP in 2015, based on the Commission services May 2013 update of the economic outlook for Portugal; (b) implement measures amounting to 3,5 % of GDP to confine the 2013 deficit to 5,5 % of GDP, including the measures defined in the 2013 Budget Law and additional measures included in the supplementary budget, namely, reductions in the wage bill, increased efficiency in the functioning of public administration, lower public consumption and better use of Union funds; (c) building on the Public Expenditure Review (PER), adopt permanent consolidation measures worth at least 2,0 % of GDP in view of attaining a headline deficit of 4,0 % of GDP in 2014 and aim at streamlining and modernising the public administration, addressing redundancies across the public sector functions and entities, improving the sustainability of the pension system and achieving targeted cost savings in individual line ministries; (d) adopt the necessary permanent consolidation measures to achieve the 2015 deficit target of 2,5 % of GDP.
Nominalna rast BDP je bila napovedana v višini – 0,6 % v letu 2013 in 1,8 % v letu 2014, v naslednjem letu pa 2,7 %.
Furthermore, Portugal was recommended to maintain reform momentum in public financial management by revising the Budget Framework Law by the end of 2013 to further enhance budgetary procedures and principles of budgetary management, accountability, transparency and simplification and to continue efforts to limit contingent liabilities stemming from state-owned enterprises and public-private partnerships.
Svet je v svojem priporočilu z dne 21. junija 2013 kot rok za sprejetje učinkovitih ukrepov v skladu z določbami člena 3(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97 določil 1. oktober 2013.
The Commission services May 2013 update of the economic outlook for Portugal, which underpinned the Council recommendation of 21 June 2013, projected that the Portuguese economy would contract by 2,3 % in 2013 before growing by 0,6 % and 1,5 %, respectively, in the two subsequent years.
V skladu s členom 10(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 472/2013 je bila Portugalska opravičena ločene predložitve poročil v okviru postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem in je poročala v okviru svojega programa za makroekonomsko prilagoditev.
Nominal GDP growth was forecast at – 0,6 % and 1,8 % in 2013 and 2014, respectively, and at 2,7 % in the following year.
V poznejših poročilih so bila poudarjena tveganja neizpolnjevanja priporočila Sveta z dne 21. junija 2013.
In its recommendation of 21 June 2013, the Council established a deadline of 1 October 2013 for effective action to be taken in line with the provisions of Article 3(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97.
Svet je julija 2015 na podlagi ocene programa za stabilnost za leto 2015, ki je bila prva ocena po zaključku programa za makroekonomsko prilagoditev, sklenil, da obstaja tveganje, da Portugalska ne bo izpolnjevala določb Pakta za stabilnost in rast.
In line with Article 10(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 472/2013, Portugal was exempted from a separate reporting under the excessive deficit procedure and reported in the framework of its macroeconomic adjustment programme.
Podobno je Komisija v svojem mnenju o osnutku proračunskega načrta Portugalske za leto 2015 ugotovila, da obstaja tveganje, da Portugalska ne bo izpolnjevala pravil Pakta za stabilnosti in rast.
Risks of non-compliance with the Council recommendation of 21 June 2013 were highlighted in subsequent assessments.
Na podlagi nove ocene ukrepov, ki jih je Portugalska sprejela za zmanjšanje čezmernega primanjkljaja do leta 2015 v odgovor na priporočilo Sveta z dne 21. junija 2013, je ugotovljeno naslednje:
Similarly, the Commission's opinion on Portugal's draft budget plan for 2015 concluded that Portugal was at risk of not complying with the rules of the Stability and Growth Pact.
Razlika glede na referenčno vrednost je bila predvsem posledica ukrepa v podporo finančnemu sektorju v okviru reševanja banke Banif (Banco Internacional do Funchal, S.A.) konec leta 2015, kar je imelo negativen učinek na javnofinančni primanjkljaj v višini 1,4 % BDP.
In particular, the Commission pointed to a risk to the timely correction of the excessive deficit by 2015.
Če se ta element upošteva skupaj z enkratnimi postavkami prihodkov, bi bil primanjkljaj brez upoštevanja enkratnih ukrepov še vedno nad referenčno vrednostjo iz Pogodbe,
Moreover, the Commission also pointed to the shortfall in structural effort as compared to the one referred to in the recommendation, indicating the need for additional structural consolidation measures for 2015 to underpin a credible and sustainable correction of the excessive deficit.
kumulativno izboljšanje strukturnega salda v obdobju 2013–2015 je ocenjeno na 1,1 % BDP, kar je precej manj od 2,5 % BDP, kot je priporočil Svet.
A new assessment of the action taken by Portugal to correct the excessive deficit by 2015 in response to the Council Recommendation of 21 June 2013, leads to the following conclusions:
Po prilagoditvi za učinke revidirane rasti potencialnega proizvoda in izrednih prihodkov ali odhodkov se kumulativno izboljšanje v primerjavi z osnovnim scenarijem, na katerem je temeljilo priporočilo, bistveno zmanjša, in sicer na – 0,1 % BDP,
Following the notification of the 2015 general government deficit and its validation by the Commission (Eurostat), the 2015 deficit came out at 4,4 % of GDP, above the Treaty reference value of 3,0 % of GDP.
obseg ukrepov, izvedenih do junija 2014, je bil skladen s cilji iz programa za makroekonomsko prilagoditev.
The gap vis-à-vis the reference value was largely due to a financial sector support measure in the context of the resolution of Banif (Banco Internacional do Funchal, SA) at the end of 2015, which had a negative impact of 1,4 % of GDP on the government deficit.
Nato se je obseg trajnih ukrepov za konsolidacijo v podporo proračunskim ciljem za leto 2014 sčasoma znatno zmanjšal, in sicer z 2,3 % BDP, kot je bilo načrtovano ob sprejetju proračuna za leto 2014, na približno 1,5 % BDP v projekciji, na kateri temelji proračun za leto 2015.
Taking that element together with one-off revenue items, the deficit net of one-off measures would still have been just above the Treaty reference value.
Tako so bili načrtovani strukturni ukrepi za konsolidacijo nezadostni za dosego priporočenega ciljnega primanjkljaja za leto 2015 v višini 2,5 % BDP.
The cumulative improvement in the structural balance in the period from 2013 to 2015 is estimated at 1,1 % of GDP, significantly below the 2,5 % of GDP recommended by the Council.
Da so bili načrtovani ukrepi nezadostni, je potrdil tudi dejanski primanjkljaj v letu 2015,
The amount of measures implemented until June 2014 was in line with the targets under the macroeconomic adjustment programme.
Nepričakovani prihodki se niso uporabili za pospešitev zmanjševanja primanjkljaja, obseg strukturnih ukrepov za konsolidacijo pa ni zadostoval za dosego ciljev,
Thereafter, the amount of permanent consolidation measures underpinning the budgetary targets for 2014 was significantly reduced over time from 2,3 % of GDP planned at the time of the 2014 budget to around 1,5 % of GDP in the projection underlying the 2015 budget.
dolg sektorja država se je od priporočila Sveta z dne 21. junija 2013 večinoma stabiliziral, pri čemer je v skladu s pomladansko napovedjo Komisije iz leta 2016 znašal 129,2 % BDP konec leta 2013, 130,2 % BDP v letu 2014 in 129,0 % BDP v letu 2015,
Thus, the amount of measures taken falls clearly short of the recommendation to take at least 2,0 % of GDP of additional measures in 2014.
fiskalno-strukturne reforme so napredovale na večini področij, čeprav z različno hitrostjo.
For 2015, the amount of permanent fiscal consolidation measures was further reduced to around 0,6 % of GDP in the 2015 budget and the headline target was set at 2,7 % of GDP.
Dolgoročna vzdržnost pokojninskega sistema se je v zadnjih letih izboljšala, vendar še vedno obstajajo kratko- in srednjeročni izzivi.
Thus, the planned structural consolidation measures were insufficient to achieve the recommended 2015 deficit target of 2,5 % of GDP.
Reforma nacionalnega sistema zdravstvenega varstva za zagotovitev njegove vzdržnosti napreduje dovolj hitro.
The 2015 deficit outturn confirmed that the planned measures were insufficient.
V preteklih letih so bile izvedene reforme javne uprave za izboljšanje fiskalnega upravljanja na regionalni in lokalni ravni ter reforme javno-zasebnih partnerstev in podjetij v državni lasti, zlasti med trajanjem programa za makroekonomsko prilagoditev.
Windfall gains were not used to accelerate the deficit reduction and the volume of structural consolidation measures was not sufficient to reach the targets.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
General government gross debt has broadly stabilised since the Council Recommendation of 21 June 2013 reaching 129,2 % of GDP at the end of 2013, 130,2 % of GDP in 2014 and 129,0 % of GDP in 2015 according to the Commission 2016 spring forecast.
Člen 1
Fiscal-structural reforms have progressed in most areas albeit at a differentiated pace.
Portugalska ni sprejela učinkovitih ukrepov v odgovor na priporočilo Sveta z dne 21. junija 2013.
The Budget Framework Law was revised and strengthened and it is set to fully enter into force in September 2018.
Člen 2
The long-term sustainability of the pension system has been improved in recent years, while short- and medium-term challenges remain.
V Bruslju, 12. julija 2016
Reform in the healthcare system with a view to ensure the sustainability of the national health service (NHS) are progressing at an adequate pace.
Za Svet
Public administration reforms to improve fiscal management at regional and local levels have been implemented over the past years as well as reforms to the public-private partnerships (PPPs) and state-owned enterprises (SOEs), particularly during the economic adjustment programme duration.
Predsednik
This leads to the conclusion that the response of Portugal to the Council recommendation of 21 June 2013 has been insufficient.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97 z dne 7. julija 1997 o pospešitvi in razjasnitvi izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem (UL L 209, 2.8.1997, str. 6).
Portugal did not put an end to its excessive deficit by 2015.
Vsi dokumenti, povezani s postopkom v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem za Portugalsko, so na voljo na naslovu: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/deficit/countries/portugal_en.htm.
The fiscal effort falls significantly short of what was recommended by the Council,
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2011/344/EU z dne 17. maja 2011 o finančni pomoči Unije Portugalski (UL L 159, 17.6.2011, str. 88).
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Komisija in portugalski organi so 17. maja 2011 podpisali Memorandum o soglasju o posebnem gospodarskopolitičnem pogojevanju (v nadaljnjem besedilu: memorandum o soglasju).
Article 1
Od takrat je Svet Portugalski izdal dve priporočili na podlagi člena 126(7) Pogodbe (9. oktobra 2012 in 21. junija 2013), v katerih je podaljšal rok za odpravo čezmernega primanjkljaja na leto 2014 oziroma 2015.
Portugal has not taken effective action in response to the Council recommendation of 21 June 2013.
Svet je v obeh priporočilih menil, da je Portugalska sprejela učinkovite ukrepe, vendar je prišlo do nepričakovanih neugodnih gospodarskih dogodkov z večjimi negativnimi posledicami za javne finance.
Article 2
Komisija je opozorila zlasti na tveganje za pravočasno odpravo čezmernega primanjkljaja do leta 2015.
This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.
Poleg tega je opozorila tudi na nezadosten strukturni napor v primerjavi s tistim iz priporočila in potrebo po dodatnih strukturnih ukrepih za konsolidacijo za leto 2015 v podporo verodostojni in vzdržni odpravi čezmernega primanjkljaja.
Done at Brussels, 12 July 2016.
Tako je obseg sprejetih ukrepov znatno manjši od priporočenega obsega dodatnih ukrepov v višini vsaj 2,0 % BDP v letu 2014.
For the Council
Za leto 2015 je bil obseg trajnih ukrepov za fiskalno konsolidacijo v proračunu za leto 2015 dodatno zmanjšan na približno 0,6 % BDP, ciljni primanjkljaj pa je bil določen na 2,7 % BDP.
The President
Zakon o proračunskem okviru je bil spremenjen in okrepljen, in naj bi v celoti začel veljati septembra 2018.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure (OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 6).
Precej truda je bilo vloženega v omejevanje davčnih goljufij in utaj ter reformo davčne uprave.
All documents related to the excessive deficit procedure of Portugal can be found at: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/sgp/deficit/countries/portugal_en.htm
Portugalska do leta 2015 ni odpravila svojega čezmernega primanjkljaja.
Council Implementing Decision 2011/344/EU of 17 May 2011 on granting Union financial assistance to Portugal (OJ L 159, 17.6.2011, p. 88).
Fiskalni napor je znatno manjši od napora, ki ga je priporočil Svet –
Council Decision (EU) 2016/1231
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/1231
on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Committee established by the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin as regards the request of Georgia to become a Contracting Party to that Convention
o stališču, ki se zavzame v imenu Evropske unije v Skupnem odboru, ustanovljenem po Regionalni konvenciji o pan-evro-mediteranskih preferencialnih pravilih o poreklu, v zvezi z zahtevo Gruzije, da postane pogodbenica navedene konvencije
The Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin [1] (the ‘Convention’) entered into force on 1 December 2012.
Regionalna konvencija o pan-evro-mediteranskih preferencialnih pravilih o poreklu [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Konvencija) je začela veljati 1. decembra 2012.
Article 5(1) of the Convention provides that a third party may become a Contracting Party to the Convention, provided that the candidate country or territory has a free trade agreement in force, providing for preferential rules of origin, with at least one of the Contracting Parties.
V členu 5(1) Konvencije je določeno, da lahko tretja stran postane pogodbenica te konvencije, če ima država kandidatka ali ozemlje z vsaj eno pogodbenico sklenjen veljaven sporazum o prosti trgovini, ki vključuje preferencialna pravila o poreklu.
Georgia has a free trade agreement in force with two Contracting Parties to the Convention, namely the Union and the Republic of Turkey, and complies with the condition set out in Article 5(1) of the Convention to become a Contracting Party.
Gruzija ima sklenjen veljavni sporazum o prosti trgovini z dvema pogodbenicama Konvencije, in sicer z Unijo in Republiko Turčijo, in izpolnjuje pogoj iz člena 5(1) Konvencije, da postane pogodbenica.
Point (b) of Article 4(3) of the Convention provides that the Joint Committee established by the Convention (the ‘Joint Committee’) is to adopt by decision invitations to third parties to accede to the Convention.
V točki (b) člena 4(3) Konvencije je določeno, da Skupni odbor, ustanovljen s Konvencijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Skupni odbor), s sklepom sprejema povabila tretjim stranem, da pristopijo h Konvenciji.
The position of the Union within the Joint Committee should therefore be based on the attached draft Decision,
Stališče Unije v okviru Skupnega odbora bi zato moralo temeljiti na priloženem osnutku sklepa –
The position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Committee established by the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin, as regards the request of Georgia to become a Contracting Party to that Convention, shall be based on the draft Decision of the Joint Committee attached to this Decision.
Stališče, ki se v imenu Evropske unije zavzame v Skupnem odboru, ustanovljenem z Regionalno konvencijo o pan-evro-mediteranskih preferencialnih pravilih o poreklu, v zvezi z zahtevo Gruzije, da postane pogodbenica navedene konvencije, temelji na osnutku sklepa Skupnega odbora, priloženem temu sklepu.
Minor technical changes to the draft Decision may be agreed to by the representatives of the Union in the Joint Committee without further decision of the Council.
Predstavniki Unije v Skupnem odboru se lahko sporazumejo o manjših tehničnih spremembah osnutka sklepa brez nadaljnjega sklepa Sveta.
DECISION No … OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONAL CONVENTION ON PAN-EURO-MEDITERRANEAN PREFERENTIAL RULES OF ORIGIN
SKLEP št. … SKUPNEGA ODBORA REGIONALNE KONVENCIJE O PAN-EVRO-MEDITERANSKIH PREFERENCIALNIH PRAVILIH O POREKLU
as regards the request of Georgia to become a Contracting Party to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin
v zvezi z zahtevo Gruzije, da postane pogodbenica Regionalne konvencije o pan-evro-mediteranskih preferencialnih pravilih o poreklu
Article 5(1) of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin (the ‘Convention’) provides that a third party may become a Contracting Party to the Convention, provided that the candidate country or territory has a free trade agreement in force, providing for preferential rules of origin, with at least one of the Contracting Parties.
V členu 5(1) Regionalne konvencije o pan-evro-mediteranskih preferencialnih pravilih o poreklu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Konvencija) je določeno, da lahko tretja stran postane pogodbenica te konvencije, če ima država kandidatka ali ozemlje z vsaj eno pogodbenico sklenjen veljaven sporazum o prosti trgovini, ki vključuje preferencialna pravila o poreklu.
Georgia has a free trade agreement in force with two Contracting Parties to the Convention, namely the European Union and the Republic of Turkey, and complies with the condition set out in Article 5(1) of the Convention to become a Contracting Party.
Gruzija ima sklenjen veljavni sporazum o prosti trgovini z dvema pogodbenicami Konvencije, in sicer z Evropsko unijo in Republiko Turčijo, in izpolnjuje pogoj iz člena 5(1) Konvencije, da postane pogodbenica.
Point (b) of Article 4(3) of the Convention provides that the Joint Committee is to adopt by decision invitations to third parties to accede to the Convention,
V točki (b) člena 4(3) Konvencije je določeno, da Skupni odbor s sklepom sprejema povabila tretjim stranem, da pristopijo h Konvenciji –
Council Decision (EU) 2016/1232
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2016/1232
establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Stabilisation and Association Council established by the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo [1], of the other part, concerning a Decision of the Stabilisation and Association Council adopting its rules of procedure
o stališču, ki se v imenu Evropske unije zavzame v Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenem svetu, vzpostavljenem s Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenim sporazumom med Evropsko unijo in Evropsko skupnostjo za atomsko energijo na eni strani ter Kosovom [1] na drugi strani, v zvezi s sklepom Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sveta o sprejetju poslovnika
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 217 in conjunction with Article 218, paragraph 9, thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 217 v povezavi s členom 218(9) Pogodbe,
Article 126 of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo [1] This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.
Člen 126 Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Evropsko skupnostjo za atomsko energijo na eni strani ter Kosovom [1] To poimenovanje ne posega v stališča o statusu ter je v skladu z RVSZN 1244/1999 in mnenjem Meddržavnega sodišča o razglasitvi neodvisnosti Kosova.
, of the other part [2] (‘the Agreement’) establishes a Stabilisation and Association Council.
na drugi strani [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum) vzpostavlja Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni svet.
Article 127(2) of the Agreement provides that the Stabilisation and Association Council is to establish its rules of procedure.
Člen 127(2) Sporazuma določa, da Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni svet sprejme svoj poslovnik.
Article 129(1) of the Agreement provides that the Stabilisation and Association Council is to be assisted by a Stabilisation and Association Committee (‘the Committee’).
Člen 129(1) Sporazuma določa, da Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenemu svetu pomaga Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni odbor (v nadaljnjem besedilu: odbor).