natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
That report finds, among other things, that the low ceiling set out in Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 as regards the value of the claim deprives many potential claimants in cross-border disputes of the use of a simplified procedure.
Med drugim je v navedenem poročilu ugotovljeno, da nizka zgornja meja iz Uredbe (ES) št. 861/2007 glede vrednosti zahtevka mnogim potencialnim tožečim strankam, ki so v čezmejnih sporih, preprečuje uporabo poenostavljenega postopka.
Furthermore, it states that several elements of the procedure could be further simplified in order to reduce the costs and the duration of litigation.
Poleg tega je navedeno, da bi bilo mogoče več elementov postopka dodatno poenostaviti ter tako zmanjšati stroške in skrajšati trajanje sodnih postopkov.
The Commission's report concludes that those obstacles could be removed most effectively by amending Regulation (EC) No 861/2007.
Sklepna ugotovitev poročila Komisije je, da bi bilo mogoče te ovire najučinkoviteje odstraniti s spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 861/2007.
Consumers should be able to use the opportunities afforded by the internal market to the fullest extent, and their confidence should not be limited by the lack of effective legal remedies for disputes in which there is a cross-border element.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da lahko potrošniki v največji možni meri izkoristijo možnosti, ki jih nudi notranji trg, in da pomanjkanje učinkovitih pravnih sredstev v sporih, v katerih je prisoten čezmejni element, ne omejuje njihovega zaupanja.
The improvements to the European Small Claims Procedure proposed in this Regulation aim to provide consumers with a means of effective redress, and thus contribute to the practical enforcement of their rights.
Cilj izboljšav evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti, ki so predlagane v tej uredbi, je potrošnikom zagotoviti učinkovita pravna sredstva in s tem prispevati k praktičnemu uveljavljanju njihovih pravic.
Increasing the ceiling as regards the value of a claim to EUR 5000 would improve access to an effective and cost-efficient judicial remedy for cross-border disputes, in particular for SMEs.
Z zvišanjem zgornje meje vrednosti zahtevka na 5000 EUR bi izboljšali dostop do učinkovitega in cenejšega sodnega varstva v čezmejnih sporih, zlasti za MSP.
Increased access to justice would enhance trust in cross-border transactions and would contribute to the fullest use of the opportunities afforded by the internal market.
Z boljšim dostopom do sodnega varstva bi okrepili zaupanje v čezmejne posle in prispevali k čim večjemu izkoriščanju možnosti, ki jih omogoča notranji trg.
This Regulation should apply to cross-border cases only.
Ta uredba bi se morala uporabljati samo za čezmejne zadeve.
A cross-border case should be considered to exist when at least one of the parties is domiciled or habitually resident in a Member State bound by this Regulation other than the Member State of the court or tribunal seised.
Veljati bi moralo, da gre za čezmejno zadevo, če ima vsaj ena od strank stalno ali običajno prebivališče v državi članici, za katero je ta uredba zavezujoča, ki ni država članica, v kateri je sodišče, pred katerim poteka postopek.
The European Small Claims Procedure should be further improved by taking advantage of the technological developments in the field of justice and of new tools available to the courts and tribunals, which can help to overcome geographical distance and its consequences in terms of high costs and length of proceedings.
Evropski postopek v sporih majhne vrednosti bi bilo treba dodatno izboljšati z izkoriščenjem tehnološkega napredka na področju pravosodja in novih orodij, ki so na voljo sodiščem, s čimer bi lahko pripomogli k premoščanju geografske razdalje in njenih posledic v smislu visokih stroškov in dolgotrajnosti postopkov.
To further reduce the costs of litigation and the length of proceedings, the use of modern communication technology by the parties and the courts and tribunals should be further encouraged.
Stranke in sodišča bi bilo treba še naprej spodbujati k uporabi sodobne komunikacijske tehnologije, da bi tako dodatno zmanjšali stroške sodnega postopka in skrajšali njegovo trajanje.
For documents which need to be served on the parties in the European Small Claims Procedure, electronic service should be on an equal footing with postal service.
Za listine, ki jih je v okviru evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti treba vročiti strankam, bi morali biti elektronska vročitev in vročitev po pošti enakovredni.
To that end, this Regulation should set a general framework that allows the use of electronic service whenever the necessary technical means are available and where the use of electronic service is compatible with the national procedural rules of the Member States involved.
V ta namen bi moral biti s to uredbo vzpostavljen splošen okvir, v katerem bi bila dovoljena uporaba elektronskega vročanja, kadar koli bi bila na voljo potrebna tehnična sredstva in kadar bi bila uporaba elektronskega vročanja združljiva z nacionalnimi procesnimi pravili sodelujočih držav članic.
As regards all other written communications between the parties or other persons involved in the proceedings and the courts or tribunals, electronic means should be used as the preferred means to the extent possible, where such means are available and admissible.
Kar zadeva vso ostalo pisno sporočanje med strankami ali drugimi osebami, ki so udeležene v postopku, in sodišči, bi se morala – kolikor je mogoče – prednostno uporabljati elektronska oblika, kadar je ta oblika razpoložljiva in dopustna.
Unless the parties or other addressees are obliged under national law to accept electronic means, they should have the choice as to whether electronic means, where such means are available and admissible, or more traditional means are to be used for the service of documents or for other written communications with the court or tribunal.
Če stranke ali drugi naslovniki po nacionalnem pravu niso dolžni sprejeti elektronske oblike, bi morali imeti možnost izbire med elektronsko obliko, kadar je takšna oblika razpoložljiva in dopustna, ali bolj tradicionalnimi oblikami vročitve listin ali drugega pisnega sporočanja s sodiščem.
The acceptance by a party of service by electronic means is without prejudice to his right to refuse to accept a document that is not written in, or accompanied by a translation into, the official language of the Member State in which he is domiciled or habitually resident or, if there are several official languages in that Member State, the official language or one of the official languages of the place where that party is domiciled or habitually resident, or in a language which he understands.
Sprejetje elektronske vročitve listin s strani stranke ne posega v njeno pravico, da zavrne sprejem listine, ki ni napisana ali ji ni bil priložen prevod v uradnem jeziku države članice, v kateri ima stalno ali običajno prebivališče, ali – v primeru, da je v tej državi članici več uradnih jezikov – v uradnem jeziku ali enem od uradnih jezikov kraja, v katerem ima ta stranka stalno ali običajno prebivališče, ali v jeziku, ki ga razume.
Where electronic means are used for the service of documents or for other written communications, existing best practices should be applied by the Member States to ensure that the content of the documents and other written communications received is true and faithful to that of the documents and other written communications sent, and that the method used for the acknowledgement of receipt provides confirmation of the receipt by the addressee and of the date of receipt.
Kadar se za vročitev listin ali drugega pisnega sporočanja uporablja elektronska oblika, bi morale države članice z uporabo obstoječih najboljših praks zagotavljati, da je vsebina teh listin in prejetega drugega pisnega sporočanja resnična in istovetna vsebini poslanih listin in poslanega drugega pisnega sporočanja ter da se na način, ki se uporablja za potrditev prejema, jamčita potrditev prejema s strani naslovnika in potrditev datuma prejema.
The European Small Claims Procedure is essentially a written procedure.
Evropski postopek v sporih majhne vrednosti je v osnovi pisni postopek.
Oral hearings should only be held exceptionally where it is not possible to give the judgment on the basis of the written evidence or where a court or tribunal agrees to hold an oral hearing upon a party's request.
Ustne obravnave bi se morale izvesti le izjemoma, kadar sodbe ne bi bilo mogoče izdati na podlagi pisnih dokazov ali kadar se sodišče na zahtevo stranke strinja z izvedbo glavne obravnave.
In order to enable persons to be heard without requiring them to travel to the court or tribunal, oral hearings as well as the taking of evidence by hearing witnesses, experts or parties should be carried out using any appropriate means of distance communication available to the court or tribunal, unless, on account of the particular circumstances of the case, the use of such technology would not be appropriate for the fair conduct of the proceedings.
Da bi se omogočilo zaslišanje oseb, ne da bi za to morale potovati na sodišče, bi bilo treba glavne obravnave in pridobivanje dokazov z zaslišanji prič, izvedencev ali strank izvajati z uporabo vseh ustreznih sredstev komuniciranja na daljavo, ki so na voljo sodišču, razen če uporaba takšne tehnologije zaradi posebnih okoliščin zadeve ne bi bila ustrezna za pošteno vodenje postopka.
As regards persons domiciled or habitually resident in a Member State other than the Member State of the court or tribunal seised, oral hearings should be organised by making use of the procedures provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 [4].
Kar zadeva osebe, ki imajo stalno ali običajno prebivališče v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri je sodišče, pred katerim poteka postopek, bi bilo treba glavno obravnavo organizirati z uporabo postopkov iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1206/2001 [4].
Member States should promote the use of distance communication technology.
Države članice bi morale spodbujati uporabo tehnologije komuniciranja na daljavo.
For the purpose of carrying out oral hearings, arrangements should be made so that the courts or tribunals that are competent in relation to the European Small Claims Procedure have access to appropriate distance communication technology with a view to ensuring the fairness of proceedings with regard to the particular circumstances of the case.
Za izvedbo glavnih obravnav bi bilo treba poskrbeti, da imajo sodišča, ki so pristojna v zvezi z evropskim postopkom v sporih majhne vrednosti, dostop do ustrezne tehnologije komuniciranja na daljavo z namenom zagotoviti poštenost postopkov glede na posebne okoliščine zadeve.
In relation to videoconferencing, the Council Recommendations on cross-border videoconferencing adopted by the Council on 15 and 16 June 2015 and the work undertaken in the framework of European e-Justice should be taken into account.
Kar zadeva videokonference, bi bilo treba upoštevati priporočila Sveta o čezmejni uporabi videokonferenc, ki jih je sprejel Svet 15. in 16. junija 2015, in delo, opravljeno v okviru evropskega e-pravosodja.
The potential costs of litigation can play a role in the claimant's decision on whether to commence a court action.
Morebitni stroški sodnega postopka lahko vplivajo na odločitev tožeče stranke ali naj začne sodni postopek.
Among other costs, court fees may discourage claimants from taking court action.
Med temi stroški lahko tožeče stranke od vložitve tožbe odvrnejo zlasti sodne takse.
In order to ensure access to justice for cross-border small claims, the court fees charged in a Member State for the European Small Claims Procedure should not be disproportionate to the claim and should not be higher than the court fees charged for national simplified court procedures in that Member State.
Da se zagotovi dostop do sodnega varstva v čezmejnih sporih majhne vrednosti, sodne takse, ki se v državi članici zaračunajo za evropski postopek v sporih majhne vrednosti, ne bi smele biti nesorazmerne z zahtevkom ali višje od sodnih taks, ki se v isti državi članici zaračunajo za nacionalne poenostavljene sodne postopke.
This should, however, not prevent the levying of reasonable minimum court fees and should be without prejudice to the possibility of levying, under the same conditions, a separate fee for any appeal procedure against a judgment given in the European Small Claims Procedure.
To sicer ne bi smelo preprečiti zaračunavanja razumnih minimalnih sodnih taks in ne bi smelo posegati v možnost, da se pod enakimi pogoji zaračuna ločena taksa za morebiten postopek pritožbe zoper sodbo, izdano v evropskem postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti.
For the purposes of this Regulation, court fees should comprise fees and charges to be paid to the court or tribunal, the amount of which is determined in accordance with national law.
Za namene te uredbe bi morale sodne takse zajemati takse in dajatve, ki se plačajo sodišču in katerih znesek je določen v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
They should not include, for example, sums which are transferred to third parties in the course of proceedings, such as lawyers' fees, translation costs, costs of service of documents by entities other than a court or tribunal, or costs paid to experts or witnesses.
Ne bi pa smele na primer vključevati zneskov, ki se med postopkom prenesejo na tretje osebe, kot so stroški odvetnika, stroški prevodov, stroški vročanja listin prek subjektov, ki niso sodišča, ali stroški, plačani izvedencem ali pričam.
Effective access to justice across the Union is a major objective.
Eden glavnih ciljev je dejanski dostop do pravnega varstva po vsej Uniji.
To ensure such effective access in the context of the European Small Claims Procedure, legal aid should be provided in accordance with Council Directive 2003/8/EC [5].
Za zagotovitev takšnega učinkovitega dostopa v okviru evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti bi se morala pravna pomoč zagotavljati v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2003/8/ES [5].
The payment of court fees should not require the claimant to travel to the Member State of the court or tribunal seised or to hire a lawyer for that purpose.
Zaradi plačila sodnih taks se od tožeče stranke ne bi smelo zahtevati, da potuje v državo članico sodišča, pred katerim poteka postopek, ali da v ta namen najame odvetnika.
In order to ensure that effective access to the proceedings is also given to claimants who are situated in a Member State other than the Member State in which the court or tribunal seised is situated, the Member States should, as a minimum, offer at least one of the distance payment methods provided for in this Regulation.
Za zagotovitev, da se učinkovit dostop do postopka zagotovil tudi tožečim strankam, ki so v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri je sodišče, pred katerim poteka postopek, bi morale države članice kot minimum nuditi vsaj enega od načinov plačila na daljavo, določenih v tej uredbi.
It should be clarified that a court settlement approved by or concluded before a court or tribunal in the course of the European Small Claims Procedure is enforceable in the same way as a judgment given in that procedure.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da je sodna poravnava, ki jo potrdi sodišče ali je sklenjena pred sodiščem med evropskim postopkom v sporih majhne vrednosti, izvršljiva na enak način kot sodba, izdana v navedenem postopku.
In order to minimise the need for translation and associated costs, the court or tribunal should, when issuing a certificate for the enforcement of a judgment given in the European Small Claims Procedure, or of a court settlement approved by or concluded before a court or tribunal in the course of that procedure, in a language other than its own, use the relevant language version of the standard form for the certificate available in a dynamic online format on the European e-Justice Portal.
Da bi čim bolj zmanjšali potrebo po prevodih in povezane stroške, bi moralo sodišče pri izdaji potrdila v zvezi z izvršbo sodbe, ki jo izda sodišče med evropskim postopkom v sporih majhne vrednosti, ali v zvezi s sodno poravnavo, ki jo potrdi sodišče ali je sklenjena pred njim med tovrstnim postopkom, v jeziku, ki ni njegov jezik, uporabiti ustrezno jezikovno različico standardnega obrazca potrdila, ki je v dinamični spletni obliki dostopen na evropskem portalu e-pravosodje.
In this regard, it should be entitled to rely on the accuracy of the translation available on that Portal.
V ta namen bi mu moralo biti dovoljeno, da se zanese na točnost prevoda, dostopnega na navedenem portalu.
Any costs for necessary translation of the text entered into the free text fields of the certificate are to be allocated as provided for under the law of the Member State of the court or tribunal.
Morebitni stroški potrebnega prevoda besedila, vpisanega v prazna besedilna polja v potrdilu, se morajo razdeliti tako, kot je določeno v pravu države članice, v kateri je sodišče.
Member States should provide practical assistance to parties in filling in the standard forms provided for in the European Small Claims Procedure.
Države članice bi morale strankam zagotavljati praktično pomoč pri izpolnjevanju standardnih obrazcev, predvidenih v evropskem postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti.
Moreover, they should provide general information on the scope of application of the European Small Claims Procedure and on which courts or tribunals are competent in relation to it.
Zagotavljati bi morale tudi splošne informacije o področju uporabe evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti in o tem, katera sodišča so v zvezi z njim pristojna.
However, that obligation should not entail the provision of legal aid or of legal assistance in the form of a legal assessment of a specific case.
Ta obveznost pa ne bi smela vključevati nudenja pravne pomoči ali pravnega svetovanja v obliki pravne presoje konkretne zadeve.
Member States should be free to decide on the most appropriate ways and means of providing such practical assistance and general information, and it should be left to the Member States to decide upon which bodies those obligations are imposed.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti prepuščeno, da same določijo najustreznejše načine in sredstva zagotavljanja takšne praktične pomoči in splošnih informacij, pa tudi, da same odločijo, katerim organom se naložijo te obveznosti.
Such general information on the scope of application of the European Small Claims Procedure and on the competent courts or tribunals may also be provided by way of reference to information given in brochures or handbooks, on national websites or on the European e-Justice Portal, or by appropriate support organisations, such as the European Consumer Centres Network.
Te splošne informacije o področju uporabe evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti in o pristojnih sodiščih se lahko zagotovijo tudi s sklicevanjem na informacije, ki so bodisi navedene v brošurah ali priročnikih, na nacionalnih spletnih straneh ali na evropskem portalu e-pravosodje bodisi jih nudijo ustrezne podporne organizacije, kakršna je mreža evropskih potrošniških centrov.
Information about court fees and methods of payment, as well as about the authorities or organisations competent to give practical assistance in the Member States should be made more transparent and easily available on the internet.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da so informacije o sodnih taksah in načinih plačila ter ustreznih organih ali organizacijah v državi članici, pristojnih za praktično pomoč, preglednejše in enostavno dostopne na internetu.
To that end, the Member States should provide that information to the Commission, which in turn should ensure that it is made publicly available and widely disseminated by any appropriate means, in particular through the European e-Justice Portal.
V ta namen bi morale države članice te informacije predložiti Komisiji, ta pa bi morala poskrbeti, da se javno objavijo in široko razširijo na kakršen koli ustrezen način, zlasti prek evropskega portala e-pravosodje.
It should be clarified in Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] that, where a dispute falls within the scope of the European Small Claims Procedure, that procedure should also be available to a claimant in a European order for payment procedure in the event that the defendant has lodged a statement of opposition against the European order for payment.
V Uredbi (ES) št. 1896/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6] bi bilo treba pojasniti, da bi moral biti v sporu, ki spada na področje uporabe evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti, ta postopek na voljo tudi tožeči stranki v postopku za evropski plačilni nalog v primeru, da je tožena stranka vložila ugovor zoper evropski plačilni nalog.
In order to further facilitate access to the European Small Claims Procedure, the standard claim form should not only be made available at the courts and tribunals that are competent in relation to the European Small Claims Procedure, but it should also be made accessible through appropriate national websites.
Da bi bil dostop do evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti še lažji, bi moral biti standardni obrazec zahtevka na voljo ne le na sodiščih, ki so pristojna za evropski postopek v sporih majhne vrednosti, temveč tudi na ustreznih nacionalnih spletnih mestih.
That obligation could be met by providing a link to the European e-Justice Portal on the relevant national websites.
Navedena obveznost bi se lahko izpolnila tako, da bi se na ustreznih nacionalnih spletnih mestih zagotovila povezava na evropski portal e-pravosodje.
To improve the protection of the defendant, the standard forms provided for in Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 should contain information about the consequences for the defendant if he does not contest the claim or does not attend an oral hearing when summoned, in particular as regards the possibility that a judgment may be given or enforced against him and that liability may be incurred for the costs of the proceedings.
Zaradi večje zaščite tožene stranke bi morali standardni obrazci, določeni v Uredbi (ES) št. 861/2007, vsebovati informacije o posledicah za toženo stranko, če ta ne ugovarja zahtevku ali se ne udeleži glavne obravnave, kadar je nanjo vabljena, zlasti kar zadeva možnost, da se sodba izda ali izvrši proti njej in da se ji naloži plačilo stroškov postopka.
The standard forms should also contain information about the fact that the successful party may not be able to recover the costs of the proceedings to the extent that they are unnecessarily incurred or are disproportionate to the value of the claim.
Standardni obrazci bi morali vsebovati tudi informacije o dejstvu, da stranka, ki v pravdi uspe, morda ne bo mogla izterjati stroškov postopka, ker so neupravičeni ali so nesorazmerni z vrednostjo zahtevka.
In order for the standard forms of the European Small Claims Procedure and of the European order for payment procedure to be kept up-to-date, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) should be delegated to the Commission in respect of changes to Annexes I to IV to Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 and in respect of changes to Annexes I to VII to Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006.
Da bi se standardni obrazci evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti in postopka za evropski plačilni nalog redno posodabljali, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo, da v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) sprejme akte v zvezi s spremembami prilog I do IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 861/2007 ter v zvezi s spremembami prilog I do VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 1896/2006.
In accordance with Article 3 of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and to the TFEU, the United Kingdom and Ireland have notified their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Regulation.
V skladu s členom 3 Protokola (št. 21) o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji (PEU) in PDEU, sta obe državi podali uradno obvestilo, da želita sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te uredbe.