natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to ensure that all applications for renewal of authorisations of plant protection products containing substances renewed in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1141/2010 are subject to the same data requirements, it is appropriate to provide for transitional measures so that the data requirements of Regulation (EU) No 545/2011 apply to all such applications.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
V členu 4(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 284/2013 se doda naslednji pododstavek:
Article 1
„Uredba (EU) št. 545/2011 se še naprej uporablja za postopke za podaljšanje registracije fitofarmacevtskega sredstva v skladu s členom 43(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, po podaljšanju odobritve aktivne snovi v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1141/2010.“
In Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 284/2013, the following subparagraph is added:
Člen 2
‘Regulation (EU) No 545/2011 shall continue to apply as regards procedures concerning the renewal of authorisations of plant protection product pursuant to Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, following the renewal of an active substance carried out pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1141/2010.’
Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 27. avgusta 2015
Done at Brussels, 27 August 2015.
Predsednik
The President
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 284/2013 z dne 1. marca 2013 o določitvi zahtevanih podatkov o fitofarmacevtskih sredstvih v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet (UL L 93, 3.4.2013, str. 85).
OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1.
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 545/2011 z dne 10. junija 2011 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede zahtevanih podatkov o fitofarmacevtskih sredstvih (UL L 155, 11.6.2011, str. 67).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 284/2013 of 1 March 2013 setting out the data requirements for plant protection products, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ L 93, 3.4.2013, p. 85).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1141/2010 z dne 7. decembra 2010 o postopku za podaljšanje vključitve druge skupine aktivnih snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in oblikovanju seznama navedenih snovi (UL L 322, 8.12.2010, str. 10).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 545/2011 of 10 June 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the data requirements for plant protection products (OJ L 155, 11.6.2011, p. 67).
Pričakovalo se je, da bodo vse vloge za podaljšanje registracij sredstev, ki vsebujejo aktivne snovi, katerih odobritve so bile podaljšane v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 1141/2010 [4], predložene do 31. decembra 2015.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1141/2010 of 7 December 2010 laying down the procedure for the renewal of the inclusion of a second group of active substances in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and establishing the list of those substances (OJ L 322, 8.12.2010, p. 10).
Tako bi se Uredba (EU) št. 545/2011 uporabljala za navedene vloge.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1476
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1476
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1479
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1479
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1482
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1482
of 31 August 2015
z dne 31. avgusta 2015
Done at Brussels, 31 August 2015.
V Bruslju, 31. avgusta 2015
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1483
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1483
of 1 September 2015
z dne 1. septembra 2015
amending Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India following and absorption reinvestigation pursuant to Article 12 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1106/2013 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih žic iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Indije, po ponovni preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije v skladu s členom 12 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1106/2013 [2] the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India (the original investigation).
Z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1106/2013 [2] je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih žic iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Indije (prvotna preiskava).
The measures imposed took the form of an ad valorem duty ranging from 0,7 % to 12,5 % for the sampled companies, 5 % for the cooperated non-sampled companies and 12,5 % for the non-cooperating companies.
Uvedeni ukrepi so bili v obliki dajatve ad valorem, in sicer od 0,7 % do 12,5 % za vzorčene družbe, 5 % za sodelujoče nevzorčene družbe in 12,5 % za nesodelujoče družbe.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 861/2013 [3] the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India ranging from 3,0 % to 3,7 %.
Z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 861/2013 [3] je Svet uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz nekaterih žic iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Indije, in sicer od 3,0 % do 3,7 %.
The Commission received a request for the initiation of an absorption reinvestigation of the measures in force pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je prejela zahtevek za začetek ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije v zvezi z veljavnimi ukrepi v skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged on 21 October 2014 by the European Confederation of Iron and Steel Industries (‘Eurofer’ or ‘the applicant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of certain stainless steel wire.
Zahtevek je 21. oktobra 2014 vložila Evropska zveza za železo in jeklo („Eurofer“ ali „vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje nekaterih žic iz nerjavnega jekla v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that following the imposition of the anti-dumping duties on imports of certain stainless steel wires originating in India, export prices have decreased and there has been insufficient movement in resale prices or subsequent selling prices in the Union.
Zahtevek je temeljil na izhodišču, da so se po uvedbi protidampinških dajatev na uvoz nekaterih žic iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Indije izvozne cene znižale in ni bilo zadostnega gibanja cen pri nadaljnji prodaji ali vseh nadaljnjih prodajnih cen v Uniji.
This resulted in an increased dumping margin which has impeded the intended remedial effects of the measures in force.
To je povzročilo povišanje stopnje dampinga, ki ovira načrtovane popravljalne učinke veljavnih ukrepov.
Initiation of an absorption reinvestigation
Začetek ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije
Having determined, after informing the Member States, that sufficient evidence existed for the reopening of the investigation, the Commission announced on 3 December 2014, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4] (‘Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an absorption reinvestigation pursuant to Article 12(1) of the basic Regulation.
Po obvestitvi držav članic je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za ponovni začetek preiskave, in 3. decembra 2014 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala začetek ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije v skladu s členom 12(1) osnovne uredbe.
In addition, the Commission specifically informed the applicant, exporting producers and importers known to be concerned and the representatives of India about the initiation of the absorption reinvestigation and invited them to participate.
Poleg tega je Komisija o začetku ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije posebej obvestila vložnika, proizvajalce izvoznike in uvoznike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike Indije, in jih povabila k sodelovanju.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje pred Komisijo in/ali pooblaščencem za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih.
None of the interested parties came forward and requested a hearing.
Nobena od zainteresiranih strani se ni javila in zahtevala zaslišanja.
In view of the apparent large number of Indian exporting producers and unrelated importers in the Union, sampling was envisaged in the Notice of Initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi očitno velikega števila indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in nepovezanih uvoznikov v Uniji je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a representative sample, Indian exporting producers and unrelated importers were requested to make themselves known within 15 days of the initiation of the absorption reinvestigation and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in v tem primeru izbrala reprezentativen vzorec, so bili indijski proizvajalci izvozniki in nepovezani uvozniki pozvani, naj se javijo v 15 dneh po začetku ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije in Komisiji predložijo zahtevane informacije iz obvestila o začetku.
Seventeen exporting producers in India provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
17 proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Indiji je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected a sample of six companies or groups of companies on the basis of the largest representative volume of exports to the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec šestih družb ali skupin družb na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega izvoza v Unijo, ki ga je bilo mogoče v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati.
The sampled companies are the same as those selected for sample or for individual examination in the original investigation with the exception of Macro Bars and Wires which was found not to be dumping in the original investigation and was thus not reinvestigated.
Vzorčene družbe so iste kot tiste, ki so bile izbrane za vzorec ali individualno preiskavo v okviru prvotne preiskave, z izjemo družbe Macro Bars and Wires, pri kateri damping v prvotni preiskavi ni bil ugotovljen, zato ni bila ponovno preiskana.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, all known exporting producers concerned and the authorities of India were consulted on the selection of the sample.
V skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe so bila o izbiri vzorca opravljena posvetovanja z vsemi znanimi proizvajalci izvozniki in pristojnimi organi Indije.
Therefore, the Commission decided to retain the proposed sample of six companies/groups of companies and all interested parties were accordingly informed of the finally selected sample.
Zato se je Komisija odločila ohraniti predlagani vzorec šestih družb/skupin družb, pri čemer so bile vse zainteresirane strani ustrezno obveščene o končnem izbranem vzorcu.
The sample of exporting producers of stainless steel wires was therefore the following:
Tako je bil vzorec proizvajalcev izvoznikov žic iz nerjavnega jekla naslednji:
the Venus Group (Hindustan Inox, Precision Metals, Sieves Manufacturer India and Venus Wire Industries),
Venus Group (Hindustan Inox, Precision Metals, Sieves Manufacturer India in Venus Wire Industries)
These companies were sampled in the original investigation.
Te družbe so bile vzorčene v prvotni preiskavi.
This company was subject to individual examination in the original investigation.
Za to družbo je bila izvedena individualna preiskava v okviru prvotne preiskave.
In total 22 known unrelated importers were contacted and 1 of them came forward and replied to the sampling form.
Stik je bil vzpostavljen z 22 znanimi nepovezanimi uvozniki, eden od njih se je javil in izpolnil obrazec za vzorčenje.
It was therefore not necessary to sample unrelated importers.
Zato ni bilo treba vzorčiti nepovezanih uvoznikov.
Replies to the questionnaires
Odgovori na vprašalnike
The Commission sent questionnaires to the six sampled Indian exporting producers/groups of exporting producers.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike šestim vzorčenim indijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom/skupinam proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Questionnaire replies were received from all of them.
Od vseh je prejela izpolnjene vprašalnike.
As regards the cooperating unrelated importer, as it did not import the product concerned to the Union during AIP no questionnaire was sent to it.
Sodelujoči nepovezani uvoznik v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije ni uvažal zadevnega izdelka v Unijo, zato mu vprašalnik ni bil poslan.
In view of various exceptional circumstances, some of the sampled exporting producers also requested extensions to submit their replies.
Nekateri vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki so zaradi različnih izjemnih okoliščin zaprosili za podaljšanje rokov za predložitev svojih odgovorov.
For these reasons, the absorption reinvestigation exceeded the normal period of six months provided for in Article 12(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bila ponovna preiskava za ugotavljanje absorpcije daljša od običajnega obdobja šestih mesecev, ki je določeno v členu 12(4) osnovne uredbe.
Verification visits pursuant to Article 16 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of all the sampled Indian exporting producers.
Preveritveni obiski iz člena 16 osnovne uredbe so bili opravljeni v prostorih vseh vzorčenih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Relevant periods covered by the absorption reinvestigation
Ustrezni obdobji, zajeti v ponovni preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije
The original investigation period covered the period from 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2012 (‘OIP’).
Izdelek v tej ponovni preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije je enak izdelku v prvotni preiskavi in je opredeljen kot žice iz nerjavnega jekla, ki vsebujejo:
B. PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
2,5 mas. % ali več niklja, razen žice, ki vsebuje 28 mas. % ali več, vendar ne več kot 31 mas. % niklja in 20 mas. % ali več, vendar ne več kot 22 mas. % kroma,
The product subject to this absorption reinvestigation is the same as that covered by the original investigation, defined as stainless steel wires containing by weight:
manj kot 2,5 mas. % niklja, razen žice, ki vsebuje 13 mas. % ali več, vendar ne več kot 25 mas. % kroma in 3,5 mas. % ali več, vendar ne več kot 6 mas. % aluminija,
2,5 % or more of nickel, other than wire containing by weight 28 % or more but not more than 31 % of nickel and 20 % or more but not more than 22 % of chromium,
trenutno pa so uvrščene pod oznaki KN 72230019 in 72230099, s poreklom iz Indije.
less than 2,5 % of nickel, other than wire containing by weight 13 % or more but not more than 25 % of chromium and 3,5 % or more but not more than 6 % of aluminium,
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo zadevni izdelek, izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu Indije, ter izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije, enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe.
currently falling within CN codes 72230019 and 72230099, originating in India.
Torej veljajo v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe za podobne izdelke.
The investigation showed that the product concerned, the product produced and sold on the domestic market of India, and the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry have the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses.
C. UGOTOVITVE PONOVNE PREISKAVE ZA UGOTAVLJANJE ABSORPCIJE
They are therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Na splošno je cilj ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije v skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe ugotoviti, ali so se od uvedbe prvotnih ukrepov izvozne cene znižale oziroma ali ni bilo zadostnega gibanja cen pri nadaljnji prodaji ali nadaljnjih prodajnih cen zadevnega izdelka v Uniji.
C. FINDINGS OF THE ABSORPTION REINVESTIGATION
Če se absorpcija potrdi, bi bilo treba izračunati novo stopnjo dampinga.
In general, an absorption reinvestigation pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation aims at establishing whether or not export prices have decreased or whether there has been insufficient movement in resale prices or subsequent selling prices in the Union of the product concerned since the imposition of the original measures.
Znižanje izvoznih cen
As a second step, where it is concluded that absorption took place, a new dumping margin should be calculated.
Komisija je pri ugotavljanju, ali so se izvozne cene znižale, na obmejni carini Unije v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije ugotovila izvozne cene stroškov, zavarovanja in prevoznine („CIF“) za vsako preiskano družbo, ter te cene primerjala z ustreznimi izvoznimi cenami, ki so bile ugotovljene v obdobju prvotne preiskave.
Decrease of export prices
Vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki so v Unijo izvažali neposredno neodvisnim strankam ali prek povezanih družb.
When establishing whether there was a decrease in export prices the Commission established for each examined company its cost, insurance and freight (CIF) export prices at the Union custom border during the AIP and compared these prices to the corresponding export prices determined in the OIP.
Kadar so proizvajalci izvozniki zadevni izdelek izvažali neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe cena, ki se je dejansko plačala ali se plačuje za zadevni izdelek, ko se ta izvozi v Unijo.
The sampled exporting producers exported to the Union either directly to independent customers or through related companies.
Kadar so proizvajalci izvozniki zadevni izdelek izvažali v Unijo prek povezane družbe uvoznice, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi cene, po kateri je bil uvoženi izdelek prvič preprodan neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
Where the exporting producers exported the product concerned directly to independent customers in the Union, the export price was the price actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Union, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
V tem primeru se je cena prilagodila za vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s PSA-stroški, in za nastali dobiček.
Where the exporting producers exported the product concerned to the Union through a related company acting as an importer, the export price was established on the basis of the price at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Union, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je za vse vzorčene družbe/skupine družb primerjala cene vrst izdelkov, ki so se prodajali v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije, s cenami enakih vrst izdelkov, ki so se prodajali v obdobju prvotne preiskave, ter za njih izračunala tehtano povprečno stopnjo absorpcije.
In this case, adjustments to the price were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale, including SG&A expenses, and for profits accruing.
Zgornja primerjava je bila opravljena v eurih.
The Commission compared for all sampled companies/groups of companies the prices of the product types sold in the AIP with the same product types sold in the OIP and calculated for them a weighted average level of absorption.
V primeru prodaje prek povezanega uvoznika so se cene pri nadaljnji prodaji, izražene v eurih (ali USD ali GBP), pretvorile v indijske rupije (INR), da so se lahko odšteli vsi stroški med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, v primeru neposredne prodaje indijskega proizvajalca izvoznika pa so se vsi stroški med indijsko mejo in mejo Unije, izraženi v INR, dodali k cenam FOB, izraženim v INR.
The above comparison was made in euro.
Zato so se pridobljene vrednosti CIF pretvorile v eure.
In the case of sales via a related importer, resale prices expressed in euro (or USD, or GBP) were converted into INR in order to be able to deduct all costs between importation and resale and, in the case of direct sales by an Indian exporting producer, all costs between the Indian border and the Union border expressed in INR were added to the FOB prices expressed in INR.
Primerjava izvoznih cen v Unijo je pokazala, da so se izvozne cene znižale za vse vzorčene družbe/skupine družb, kar prima facie dokazuje absorpcijo veljavnih ukrepov.
Consequently, the CIF values obtained were converted into euro.
Za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike je bilo znižanje izvoznih cen, izraženih v eurih, naslednje:
The comparison of the export prices to the Union showed that for all of the sampled companies/group of companies the export prices decreased, indicating prima facie that absorption of the measures in force was taking place.
Gibanje izvoznih cen od obdobja prvotne preiskave do obdobja ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije (EUR)
Nevatia Steel & Alloys
Po ugotovitvi možne absorpcije za vse vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike so bile ponovno izračunane stopnje dampinga v skladu s členom 2 osnovne uredbe.
Evolution of export prices from OIP to AIP (EUR)
V točki 5.1.1(a) obvestila o začetku so bili proizvajalci izvozniki pozvani, da Komisijo v 15 dneh od datuma objave obvestila o začetku obvestijo, ali zahtevajo popravek normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 12(5) osnovne uredbe.
Dumping
Z izjemo družbe Venus Group so vsi drugi vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki zahtevali popravek normalnih vrednosti na podlagi člena 12(5) osnovne uredbe in Komisiji predložili popolne informacije, ustrezno utemeljene z dokazi, za ponovni izračun njihovih stopenj dampinga.
After having established possible absorption for all the sampled exporting producers, dumping margins were recalculated, according to Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
Za družbo Venus Group, ki ni zahtevala popravka svojih normalnih vrednosti, so bile normalne vrednosti, kot so bile ugotovljene v prvotni preiskavi, uporabljene za izračun stopenj dampinga v obdobju ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije.
In point 5.1.1(a) of the Notice of Initiation, the exporting producers were asked to inform the Commission within 15 days of the date of publication of the Notice of Initiation whether they request a revision of the normal value under Article 12(5) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost
With the exception of Venus group all other sampled exporting producers requested the revision of their normal values based on Article 12(5) of the basic Regulation and provided Commission with complete information duly substantiated by evidence for the recalculation of their dumping margins.
Za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike je bila normalna vrednost določena na naslednji način:
For Venus group which did not request for revision of its normal values, normal values as they were established in the original investigation were used for the calculation of dumping margins during the AIP.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe najprej proučila, ali je bil celotni obseg domače prodaje za vsakega vzorčenega proizvajalca izvoznika reprezentativen.
Normal value
Domača prodaja je reprezentativna, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu na proizvajalca izvoznika v obdobju preiskave predstavljal vsaj 5 % njegovega celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.