natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following final disclosure, this interested party reiterated its claim stated in recital 136 above, however without providing any additional information for its claim.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da Komisija pri odločanju o stopnji protidampinških ukrepov uporablja pravilo nižje dajatve v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe, kar je poudarjeno tudi v uvodni izjavi 143.
In this regard, it is highlighted that when deciding on the level of the anti-dumping measures, the Commission is applying the lesser-duty rule in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation and as also outlined in recital 143 below.
Drugih pripomb ni bilo, zato se uvodne izjave 169 do 172 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any other comments recitals 169 to 172 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Sklep o interesu Unije
Conclusion on Union interest
Drugih pripomb v zvezi z interesom Unije ni bilo, zato se sklepi iz uvodne izjave 173 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the Union interest, the conclusions reached in recital 173 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
G. DOKONČNI PROTIDAMPINŠKI UKREPI
G. DEFINITIVE ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
Stopnja odprave škode (stopnja škode)
Injury elimination level (Injury margin)
Po začasnem razkritju sta dve zainteresirani strani nasprotovali ciljnemu dobičku, ki je bil uporabljen pri določitvi stopnje odprave škode, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 175 do 177 začasne uredbe.
Following provisional disclosure, two interested parties contested the target profit used in order to determine the injury elimination level as set out in recitals 175 to 177 of the provisional Regulation.
Strani sta trdili, da bi bila 2-odstotna stopnja dobička preskušena na trgu, zato bi jo bilo treba uporabiti za določitev stopnje odprave škode.
The parties argued that a profit margin of 2 % would be a market-tested profit level and should therefore be used instead in order to establish the injury elimination level.
Vendar trditev ni bila utemeljena, zato je bila zavrnjena.
However, the claim was not substantiated and therefore it was rejected.
Drugih pripomb v zvezi s stopnjo odprave škode ni bilo, zato se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 175 do 177 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any other comments regarding the injury elimination level, the conclusions reached in recitals 175 to 177 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Dokončni ukrepi
Definitive measures
Glede na sklepe v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročnostjo in interesom Unije ter v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe bi bilo treba dokončne protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka uvesti na ravni stopnje škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, definitive anti-dumping measures should be imposed on the imports of the product concerned at the level of the injury margin, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Po dokončnem razkritju je več previjalcev trdilo, da bi bilo treba dokončne ukrepe uvesti v obliki minimalne uvozne cene.
After final disclosure, several rewinders claimed that the definitive measures should be imposed in a form of a minimum import price (MIP).
Strani so predlagale, da bi bilo treba minimalno uvozno ceno določiti na ravni nekoliko zvišane dobičkonosne cene proizvajalca, ki proizvaja samo AHF.
The parties suggested that the MIP should be set at the level of a slightly increased profitable price of the producer manufacturing solely AHF.
Po zaslišanju pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje so strani predložile dodatne informacije, pri čemer so trdile, da se je premija za aluminij po obdobju preiskave znižala.
Following the hearing with the Hearing Officer, the parties submitted additional information claiming that the aluminium premium decreased after the investigation period.
Pri ugotavljanju, ali obstaja interes Unije, kot ga navaja člen 21(1) osnovne uredbe, se za te namene lahko upoštevajo informacije, ki se nanašajo na obdobje po obdobju preiskave [10].
In the context of determining whether there is a Union interest as contemplated in Article 21(1) of the basic Regulation, information relating to a period subsequent to the investigation period may be taken into account for those purposes.
Vendar še vedno velja, da je treba take podatke preveriti in da morajo biti reprezentativni za celotno industrijo Unije.
However, the requirement of such data to be verified and representative for the whole Union industry still applies.
Ker se je minimalna uvozna cena zahtevala v tako pozni fazi postopka, Komisija ni imela časa poslati vprašalnikov zainteresiranim stranem in organizirati preveritvenih obiskov.
As the request for a MIP was made at such a late stage in the proceeding, the Commission did not have the time to send questionnaires to interested parties and organise verification visits.
Informacij, ki so jih predložile strani, ki so zahtevale minimalno uvozno ceno, ni bilo mogoče preveriti, prav tako pa niso bile reprezentativne za celotno industrijo Unije.
The information submitted by the parties asking for a MIP could not be verified and also was not representative for the whole Union industry.
Predložene informacije dejansko kažejo na zvišanje prodajnih cen, medtem ko se premija za aluminij znižuje, vendar Komisija ne more izpeljati smiselnih sklepov na podlagi nepreverjenih in nereprezentativnih podatkov.
The information submitted indeed indicates an increase of sales prices while the aluminium premium is decreasing, however the Commission cannot draw meaningful conclusions on unverified and non-representative data.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba raven minimalne uvozne cene izračunati na podlagi podatkov, ki so reprezentativni za celotno industrijo Unije, in ne le na podlagi enega samega proizvajalca Unije, kot so predlagali uporabniki.
In addition, the level of the MIP should be calculated on the basis of the data representative for the whole Union industry and not just on the basis of one single Union producer as was proposed by the users.
Preveriti je treba tudi podatke, ki so se uporabili za izračun minimalne uvozne cene, prav tako pa Komisija ni mogla zbrati in preveriti potrebnih podatkov, saj se je minimalna uvozna cena zahtevala v prepozni fazi postopka.
In addition, the data used for the calculation of a MIP needs to be verified and, as the request for a MIP was made at such a late stage of the proceeding, the Commission was not in the position to collect and verify the necessary data.
Zato se je predlagana minimalna uvozna cena štela za neprimerno.
Therefore, the proposed MIP was considered inappropriate.
Sprememba vrste ukrepa bi vsekakor zahtevala popolno razkritje vsem zainteresiranim stranem, sicer bi se s tem znatno kršile postopkovne pravice industrije Unije.
In any event, a change of the type of measure would require full disclosure to all interested parties, otherwise it would significantly breach the procedural rights of the Union industry.
Ker se je ta trditev predložila v tako pozni fazi preiskave, Komisija ni imela potrebnega časa za tako razkritje zainteresiranim stranem.
As this claim was made at such a late stage of the investigation, the Commission did not have the necessary time to make such a disclosure to the interested parties.
Poleg tega so izvozne cene zaradi dejstva, da izvoznik prodaja v Uniji prek povezanega trgovca, nezanesljive.
In addition, the fact that the exporter sells in the Union via a related trader makes the export prices unreliable.
Zato se je ob upoštevanju navedenega štelo, da okoliščine tega posebnega primera niso take, da bi upravičile uvedbo minimalne uvozne cene.
Therefore, in light of the above it was considered that in this particular case the circumstances are not such as to warrant the imposition of a MIP.
Vendar bi bilo treba upoštevati, da imajo previjalci še vedno možnost, da zahtevajo vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, če so izpolnjeni pogoji.
Nevertheless, it should be noted that the rewinders have still the possibility of asking for an interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation if the conditions are met.
Na podlagi navedenega se naložijo naslednje stopnje dajatev:
On the basis of the above, the rate at which such duties will be imposed are set as follows:
Stopnja dampinga (v %)
Dumping margin (%)
Stopnja škode
Injury margin
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev
Definitive anti-dumping duty
Rusija
Russia
Ural Foil OJSC, regija Sverdlovsk; OJSC Rusal Sayanal, regija Khakassia – Rusal Group
Ural Foil OJSC, Sverdlovsk region; OJSC Rusal Sayanal, Khakassia region — Rusal Group
Dokončno pobiranje začasnih dajatev
Definitive collection of the provisional duties
Ob upoštevanju ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in ravni škode, povzročene industriji Unije, bi bilo treba dokončno pobrati zneske, zavarovane z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, ki je bila uvedena z začasno uredbo.
In view of the dumping margins found and given the level of the injury caused to the Union industry, the amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty, imposed by the provisional Regulation, should be definitively collected.
Zaveze
Undertakings
Po dokončnem razkritju je skupina Rusal ponudila cenovno zavezo v skladu s členom 8(1) osnovne uredbe.
Following the final disclosure Rusal group offered a price undertaking under Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je ponudbo podrobno proučila.
The offer was thoroughly examined by the Commission.
Poudariti je treba, da je Rusal kompleksna skupina podjetij z več kot 40 obrati v 13 državah.
It is important to note that Rusal is a complex company group with over 40 plants in 13 countries.
Skupina zlasti vključuje povezanega proizvajalca iz Armenije (Armenal), ki proizvaja zadevni izdelek in ga prodaja v Unijo.
In particular, the group includes a related producer in Armenia (Armenal) producing and selling the product concerned to the Union.
Glede na razmerje med ruskimi proizvajalci izvozniki in družbo Armenal je verjetno, da bodo te družbe zadevni izdelek prodajale istim strankam ali strankam, povezanim z eno od teh strank v Uniji.
In view of the relationship between the Russian exporting producers and Armenal, it is likely that these companies will sell the product concerned to the same customers or customers related to one of these customers in the Union.
To predstavlja visoko tveganje za navzkrižno kompenzacijo.
This poses high risk of cross-compensation.
Poleg tega skupina Rusal posluje prek zelo zapletenih prodajnih poti, v katere so vključeni povezani trgovci in povezani zastopniki v Rusiji in zunaj nje.
In addition, Rusal group operates through very complex sales channels with the involvement of related traders and related agents located both inside and outside Russia.
Povezani trgovec in povezani zastopnik prodajata tudi druge izdelke v Unijo, pri čemer ti dejansko predstavljajo večji del prihodka od prodaje povezanega trgovca.
The related trader and the related agent also sell other products to the Union, and these other products represent in fact the majority of the related trader's turnover.
V teh okoliščinah ni mogoče izključiti, da se zadevni izdelek in drugi izdelki prodajajo istim strankam.
Under these circumstances it cannot be excluded that both product concerned and other products are sold to the same customers.
Take transakcije bi vključevale visoko tveganje za navzkrižno kompenzacijo in zaradi njih bi bilo spremljanje zaveze vsekakor posebej zapleteno.
Such transactions would entail a high risk of cross-compensation and in any event would make the monitoring of the undertaking particularly complex.
Na podlagi navedenega se sklene, da bi bilo sprejetje zaveze nepraktično, zato je treba ponudbo o zavezi zavrniti.
Based on above it is concluded that the acceptance of the undertaking would be impractical and consequently the undertaking offer has to be rejected.
Odbor, ustanovljen v skladu s členom 15(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009, ni predložil mnenja –
The Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 did not deliver an opinion,
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Article 1
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev se uvede na uvoz aluminijaste folije debeline najmanj 0,008 mm, vendar največ 0,018 mm, brez podlage, samo valjane, vendar dalje ne obdelane, v zvitkih, širokih do vključno 650 mm in z maso več kot 10 kg, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN ex76071119 (oznaka TARIC 7607111910), s poreklom iz Rusije.
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of aluminium foil of a thickness of not less than 0,008 mm and not more than 0,018 mm, not backed, not further worked than rolled, in rolls of a width not exceeding 650 mm and of a weight exceeding 10 kg, currently falling within CN code ex76071119 (TARIC code 7607111910), and originating in Russia.
Stopnje dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatev za izdelek iz odstavka 1, znašajo 12,2 %.
The rates of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the product described in paragraph 1 shall be 12,2 %.
Če ni določeno drugače, se uporabljajo veljavni carinski predpisi.
Article 2
Zneski, zavarovani z začasnimi protidampinškimi dajatvami v skladu z Uredbo (EU) 2015/1081, se dokončno poberejo.
The amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duties pursuant to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1081 shall be definitively collected.
Člen 3
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States..
V Bruslju, 17. decembra 2015
Done at Brussels, 17 December 2015.
Za Komisijo
OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1081 z dne 3. julija 2015 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih folij s poreklom iz Rusije (UL L 175, 4.7.2015, str. 14).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1081 of 3 July 2015 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium foils originating in Russia (OJ L 175, 4.7.2015, p. 14).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 973/2012 z dne 22. oktobra 2012 o začetku preiskave glede možnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 925/2009 na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih folij s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske z uvozom nekaterih aluminijastih folij v zvitkih, ki niso žarjeni in širine več kot 650 mm, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, in o registraciji takšnega uvoza (UL L 293, 23.10.2012, str. 28).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 973/2012 of 22 October 2012 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People's Republic of China by imports of certain aluminium foil in rolls which are not annealed and of a width exceeding 650 mm originating in the People's Republic of China, and making such imports subject to registration (OJ L 293, 23.10.2012, p. 28).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 925/2009 z dne 24. septembra 2009 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih folij s poreklom iz Armenije, Brazilije in Ljudske republike Kitajske.
Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 of 24 September 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in Armenia, Brazil and the People's Republic of China (OJ L 262, 6.10.2009, p.
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 638/2013 z dne 2. julija 2013 o ustavitvi preiskave glede možnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 925/2009 na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih folij s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske z uvozom nekaterih aluminijastih folij v zvitkih, ki niso žarjeni in širine več kot 650 mm, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 184, 3.7.2013, str. 1).
1).
Obvestilo o začetku protidampinškega postopka za uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih folij s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL C 444, 12.12.2014, str. 13).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 638/2013 of 2 July 2013 terminating the investigation concerning possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People's Republic of China by imports of certain aluminium foil in rolls which are not annealed and of a width exceeding 650 mm originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 184, 3.7.2013, p. 1).
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/1928 z dne 23. oktobra 2015 o ustavitvi protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih aluminijastih folij s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 281, 27.10.2015, str. 16).
Notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ C 444, 12.12.2014, p. 13).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 833/2012 z dne 17. decembra 2012 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih aluminijastih folij v zvitkih s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 251, 18.9.2012, str. 29).
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1928 of 23 October 2015 terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 281, 27.10.2015, p. 16).
Obvestilo o bližnjem izteku nekaterih protidampinških ukrepov (UL C 49, 21.2.2014, str. 7).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 833/2012 of 17 September 2012 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium foils in rolls originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 251, 18.9.2012, p. 29).
Sodba Splošnega sodišča z dne 25. oktobra 2011 v zadevi T-192/08, Transnational Company „Kazchrome“ AO, točka 221.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures, OJ C 49, 21.2.2014, p. 7.
Proizvodnja AHF je strojno intenzivna.
making imports of high fatigue performance steel concrete reinforcement bars originating in the People's Republic of China subject to registration
o obvezni registraciji uvoza armaturnih palic iz jekla z visoko odpornostjo proti utrujenosti s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 14(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 14(5) Uredbe,
On 30 April 2015, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘the notice of initiation’), the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding (‘the anti-dumping proceeding’) with regard to imports into the Union of high fatigue performance steel concrete reinforcement bars (‘HFP rebars’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’ or ‘the country concerned’) following a complaint lodged on 17 March 2015 by the European Steel Association (‘Eurofer’ or ‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of HFP rebars.
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je po pritožbi, ki jo je 17. marca 2015 vložilo Evropsko jeklarsko združenje („Eurofer“ ali „pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje armaturnih palic iz jekla z visoko odpornostjo proti utrujenosti v Uniji, 30. aprila 2015 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka („protidampinški postopek“) v zvezi z uvozom armaturnih palic iz jekla z visoko odpornostjo proti utrujenosti s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „zadevna država“) v Unijo.
The product subject to registration (‘the product concerned’) are high fatigue performance iron or steel concrete reinforcing bars and rods made of iron, non-alloy steel or alloy steel (but excluding of stainless steel, high-speed steel and silico-manganese steel), not further worked than hot-rolled, but including those twisted after rolling; these bars and rods contain indentations, ribs, grooves or other deformations produced during the rolling process or are twisted after rolling; the key characteristic of high fatigue performance is the ability to endure repeated stress without breaking and, specifically, the ability to resist in excess of 4,5 million fatigue cycles using a stress ratio (min/max) of 0,2 and a stress range exceeding 150 MPa, originating in the PRC, and currently falling within CN codes ex72142000, ex72283020, ex72283041, ex72283049, ex72283061, ex72283069, ex72283070 and ex72283089.
Izdelek, za katerega velja obvezna registracija („zadevni izdelek“), so vroče valjane armaturne palice iz železa ali jekla z visoko odpornostjo proti utrujenosti, narejene iz železa, nelegiranega ali legiranega jekla (razen nerjavnega, hitroreznega in silicij-manganovega jekla), brez nadaljnje obdelave, vključno s tistimi, ki so po valjanju zvite; palice imajo vdolbine, rebra, utore ali druge deformacije, ki nastanejo med procesom valjanja, ali pa so po valjanju zvite; visoka odpornost proti utrujenosti pri armaturnih palicah pomeni zlasti, da prenašajo ponavljajoče se obremenitve, ne da bi se prelomile, tj. lahko prenesejo več kot 4,5 milijona ciklov obremenitev z razmerjem (min./maks.) 0,2 in napetostjo, ki presega 150 MPa, pri čemer ima izdelek poreklo iz LRK ter je trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex72142000, ex72283020, ex72283041, ex72283049, ex72283061, ex72283069, ex72283070 in ex72283089.
These CN codes are given for information only and have no binding effect on the classification of the product.
Te oznake KN so zgolj informativne in nimajo zavezujočega učinka na uvrstitev izdelka.
The complainant requested that imports of the product concerned are made subject to registration so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports from the date of such registration.
Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe carinskim organom naroči, naj sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza, da se proti navedenemu uvozu lahko uporabijo ukrepi.
GROUNDS FOR REGISTRATION
Obvezna registracija uvoza se lahko uvede na podlagi zahtevka industrije Unije, ki vsebuje zadostne dokaze, ki upravičujejo tak ukrep.
According to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission may direct the customs authorities to take the appropriate steps to register imports, so that measures may subsequently be applied against those imports.
Pritožnik trdi, da je registracija upravičena, ker se dampinški uvoz zadevnega izdelka nadaljuje, uvozniki pa so se zavedali ali bi se morali zavedati dampinških praks, ki so trajale daljše časovno obdobje in so povzročale škodo industriji Unije.
Imports may be made subject to registration following a request from the Union industry, which contains sufficient evidence to justify such action.
Pritožnik trdi tudi, da kitajski uvoz povzroča škodo industriji Unije in da se je raven tega uvoza znatno povišala, tudi po obdobju preiskave, kar bi resno ogrozilo popravljalne učinke protidampinške dajatve, če bi se taka dajatev uporabljala.
The complainant claims that registration is justified as the product concerned continues to be dumped and that importers were well or should have been aware of dumping practices which stretched over an extended period of time and were causing injury to the Union industry.
Komisija meni, da so se uvozniki zavedali ali bi se morali zavedati dampinških praks izvoznikov.
The complainant further claims that Chinese imports are causing injury to the Union industry and that there was a substantial increase in the level of these imports, even following the investigation period, which would seriously undermine the remedial effect of the anti-dumping duty, if such a duty is to be applied.
V zvezi s tem je pritožba vsebovala dovolj dokazov prima facie, kar je bilo podrobno navedeno v obvestilu o začetku tega postopka [3].