natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the administrative and market prices for the privately owned and publicly owned forest plots swapped, information on the additional cash amounts involved in each transaction, and the resulting State aid amount,
Na zahtevo Komisije takoj predloži informacije o že sprejetih in načrtovanih ukrepih za uskladitev s tem sklepom.
the name of the private party, i.e. the beneficiary of the swap transaction, involved in each transaction and an indication of the reasons why that party is or is not considered to be an undertaking.
Prav tako predloži podrobne informacije o zneskih pomoči in obrestih za vračilo, ki so jih upravičenci že vrnili.
identification of the cases in which recovery will be conducted on the basis of the market prices at the moment of the swap transactions specified in submission 2014/032997 of the Republic of Bulgaria;
Člen 7
identification of the cases in which recovery will be effectuated by undoing the swap transaction;
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Republiko Bolgarijo.
identification of the cases in which recovery will be implemented on the basis of amounts determined by an independent expert evaluator and documents demonstrating that such an independent expert, selected by public tender and agreed to by the Commission, has been appointed.
V Bruslju, 5. septembra 2014
Within eight months following notification of this Decision, the Republic of Bulgaria shall submit to the Commission the following information:
Za Komisijo
the list of beneficiaries that have received aid under the swap transactions referred to in Article 1 and the total amount of aid received by each of them as a result of those transactions;
Podpredsednik
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
UL C 273, 16.9.2011, str.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
13.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
Glej opombo 1.
Within 12 months following notification of this Decision, the Republic of Bulgaria shall submit documents demonstrating that the aid has fully been recovered from the beneficiaries concerned.
Dopis z dne 26. julija 2011.
The Republic of Bulgaria shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until the recovery of the aid granted under the swap transactions referred to in Article 1 has been completed by submitting reports on a two-monthly basis.
Dopis z dne 27. julija 2011.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Dopisa z dne 28. julija in 14. oktobra 2011.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Dopis z dne 29. julija 2011.
Article 7
Dopisi z dne 30. julija 2011 ter 15. in 22. oktobra 2011.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Bulgaria.
Dopis z dne 31. julija 2011.
Done at Brussels, 5 September 2014.
Dopis z dne 1. avgusta 2011.
For the Commission
Dopis z dne 5. avgusta 2011.
Vice-President
Dopis z dne 12. avgusta 2011.
OJ C 273, 16.9.2011, p.
Dopis z dne 22. avgusta 2011.
13.
Dopis z dne 12. oktobra 2011.
See footnote 1.
Dopisa z dne 14. in 23. oktobra 2011.
Letter dated 26 July 2011.
Dopis z dne 14. oktobra 2011.
Letter dated 27 July 2011.
Dopisa z dne 16. septembra in 15. oktobra 2011.
Letters dated 28 July and 14 October 2011.
Dopisa z dne 15. oktobra 2011 in 7. decembra 2011.
Letter dated 29 July 2011.
Aqua Estate OOD, Beta Forest EOOD, Kosta Gerov, Dimitar Terziev, Javor Hajtov, Valentina Hajtova, Georgi Aleksandrov Babev, Marjeta Babeva, Elizabet Mihajlova, Svetoslav Mihajlov, BG Land Co OOD, Mirta Engineering EOOD, Miks PS-OOD in Boil OOD.
Letters dated 30 July 2011, 15 and 22 October 2011.
Bolgarski zakon o gozdovih, objavljen v bolgarskem uradnem listu št. 125 z dne 29. decembra 1997.
Letter dated 31 July 2011.
Sprejeta z odlokom sveta ministrov št. 252 z dne 6. novembra 2003, objavljena v bolgarskem uradnem listu št. 101 z dne 18. novembra 2003 (nazadnje spremenjena v bolgarskem uradnem listu št. 1 z dne 5. januarja 2007).
Letter dated 1 August 2011.
Izvršilna agencija za gozdove se je predhodno imenovala državna agencija za gozdove ali DAG.
Letter dated 12 August 2011.
Če zemljišče spada na več kot eno območje, se upošteva višji koeficient.
Letter dated 22 August 2011.
Objavljen v bolgarskem uradnem listu št. 1 z dne 2. januarja 2001.
Letter dated 12 October 2011.
V obdobju med letoma 1999 in 2007 se je to ministrstvo imenovalo ministrstvo za kmetijstvo in gozdove.
Letters dated 14 and 23 October 2011.
V ministrstvo za kmetijstvo in prehrano se je preimenovalo na začetku leta 2008.
Letter dated 14 October 2011.
Zaradi doslednosti se v celotnem sklepu uporablja sedanje ime ministrstva.
Letters dated 16 September and 15 October 2011.
Izvršilna agencija za gozdove (IAG) je bila nekoč del tega ministrstva.
Letters dated 15 October 2011 and 7 December 2011
Objavljen v bolgarskem uradnem listu št. 44 z dne 21. maja 1996 (nazadnje spremenjen v bolgarskem uradnem listu št. 41 z dne 2. junija 2009).
Letter dated 17 October 2011.
Objavljen v bolgarskem uradnem listu št. 275 z dne 22. novembra 1950 (nazadnje spremenjen v bolgarskem uradnem listu št. 50 z dne 30. maja 2008).
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p.
Neznano število načrtovanih sprememb namembnosti bi lahko bilo blokirano zaradi moratorija, uvedenega leta 2009.
1), this interested party has requested its identity is not disclosed to the Member State concerned on grounds of potential damage.
UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str.
Aqua Estate OOD, Beta Forest EOOD, Kosta Gerov, Dimitar Terziev, Yavor Haytov, Valentina Haytova, Georgi Aleksandrov Babev, Marieta Babeva, Elizabet Mihaylova, Svetoslav Mihaylov, BG Land Co OOD, Mirta Engineering EOOD, Miks PS-OOD, and Boil OOD.
13.
Bulgarian Forest Act published in Bulgarian State Journal No 125 of 29 December 1997.
UL C 319, 27.12.2006, str.
The Executive Forests Agency was previously called State Forest Agency, or SFA.
Po mnenju pritožnika izključitev gozda iz državnega sklada gozdov vpliva na poznejšo odločitev lokalnih organov v zvezi z njegovo nadaljnjo uporabo, ker nimajo boljše možnosti, kot da sprejmejo podroben prostorski načrt za zemljišče, ki ni več gozdno zemljišče in zaščiteno kot tako.
It will be referred to as the ‘EFA’ throughout the present decision for reasons of consistency.
„Bolgarija: Poročilo o gozdni politiki“, 10. marec 2009, str.
In cases in which an estate falls into more than one area, the higher coefficient is taken into account.
11, odstavek 51, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/BULGARIAEXTN/Resources/305438-1224088560466/BulgariaForestPolicyNote03102009GOB.pdf.
Published in the Bulgarian State Journal No 1 of 2 January 2001
Ecobalkani-Bulgaria EOOD, Vihren OOD in Elkabel AD.
During the period 1999 to 2007, this Ministry was known as the Ministry of Agriculture and Forests.
To mnenje so podprli Foros, Mirta Engineering, Beta Forest, LM Impex, g.
It was renamed the Ministry of Agriculture and Food at the beginning of 2008.
Gerov, g.
The Ministry is referred to by its current name throughout this decision for reasons of consistency.
Babev in ga.
The Executive Forests Agency (EFA) was once part of this Ministry.
Babeva, g.
Published in Bulgarian State Journal No 44 of 21 May 1996 (last amended in Bulgarian State Journal No 41 of 2 June 2009)
Terziev, g.
Published in Bulgarian State Journal No 275 of 22 November 1950 (last amended in Bulgarian State Journal No 50 of 30 May 2008)
Mihajlov in ga.
An unknown number of intended changes of use may be blocked by the moratorium imposed in 2009.
Mihajlova.
OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p.
All Seas.
13.
LM Impex.
OJ C 319, 27.12.2006, p.
To mnenje so podprli Izgrev, Litex, MIKS, BOIL in ga.
1.
Blagoeva.
According to the complainant, the exclusion of forest from the State forest fund prejudices the subsequent decision of the local authorities regarding its subsequent use, as they have no better option but to adopt a Detailed Spatial Plan for the plot, which has ceased to be forest land and protected as such.
To mnenje so podprli g.
‘Bulgaria: Forest Policy Note’, 10.3.2009, p.
Gerov in g.
Ecobalkani-Bulgaria EOOD, Vihren OOD and Elkabel AD
Babev in ga.
This opinion was supported by Foros, Mirta Engineering, Beta Forest, LM Impex, Mr Gerov, Mr Babev and Mrs Babeva, Mr Terziev, Mr Mihailov and Mrs Mihailova
Babeva.
All Seas
Foros Development, Izgrev, Liteks Komers in Jivka Blagoeva.
LM Impex
To mnenje so podprli g.
This opinion was supported by Izgrev, Litex, MIKS, BOIL, and Mrs Blagoeva.
Mihajlov in ga.
This opinion was supported by Mr Gerov and Terziev and by Mr Babev and Mrs Babeva.
Mihajlova, Mirta Engineering, Beta Forest, Elkabel in ga.
Foros Development, Izgrev, Liteks Komers and Jivka Blagoeva
Blagoeva.
This opinion was supported by Mr Mihailov and Mrs Mihailova, Mirta Engineering, Beta Forest, Elkabel and Mrs Blagoeva.
Ga.
Izgrev and Litex Komers
Izgrev in Litex Komers.
Mr Gerov, Mr Babev and Mrs Babeva, and Mr Terziev (and their lawyer Mrs Shankova on their behalf).
G. Gerov, g.
LM Impex, Mr Mihailov and Mrs Mihailova, Mirta Eningeering, Beta Forest, Foros Development.
Babev in ga.
Elkabel.
Babeva ter g.
In response to doubts expressed by the Commission, Elkabel ordered a new expertise from an independent expert which showed that even though for some of the plots concerned the market prices would be higher than the administrative prices calculated in line with the Regulation on basic prices, the total administrative price of all plots exchanged by Elkabel was higher than their market value.
Terziev (in njihova odvetnica ga.
It was further explained that the total administrative price of the publicly-owned plots that were exchanged was also higher than their market value.
Šankova v njihovem imenu).
The evaluator hence concluded that the use of administrative prices did not lead to the granting of an unwarranted advantage to Elkabel
LM Impex, g.
Izgrev, Litex Komers, Mr Gerov, Mr Terziev, Mr Babev and Mrs Babeva, MIKS and BOIL.
Mihajlov in ga.
In the case of Mr Mihailov and Mrs Mihailova, the value of the swapped privately owned land was allegedly higher (BGN 83322,66) than that of the publicly owned land (BGN 67125,00).
Mihajlova, Mirta Eningeering, Beta Forest, Foros Development.
Mr Mihailov and Mrs Mihailova, Mirta Engineering and Beta Forest (in relation to the Novo Oriahovo Region), Foros Development (in relation to the Burgas Municipality), and MIKS and BOIL (in relation to the Nessebar Region).
Družba Elkabel je v odgovor na dvome Komisije naročila novo izvedensko mnenje neodvisnega izvedenca, iz katerega izhaja, da je bila skupna administrativna cena vseh parcel, ki jih je zamenjala družba Elkabel, višja od njihove tržne vrednosti, čeprav bi bile tržne cene za nekatera zadevna zemljišča višje od administrativnih cen, izračunanih v skladu z uredbo o osnovnih cenah.
MIKS, BOIL, Foros Development, Mirta Engineering and Beta Forest
Nadalje je bilo pojasnjeno, da je bila tudi skupna administrativna cena zemljišč v javni lasti, ki so bila zamenjana, višja od njihove tržne vrednosti.
Izgrev, Mrs Blagoeva, MIKSD, BOIL, Mirta Engineering, Beta Forest, Mr Mihailov and Mrs Mihailova
Cenilec je zato ugotovil, da uporaba administrativnih cen ni povzročila dodelitve neupravičene ugodnosti družbi Elkabel.
Litex Komers.
Izgrev, Litex Komers, g.
BOIL, Mr Mihailov and Mrs Mihailova
Gerov, g.
Mr Gerov, Mr Terziev, and Mr Babev and Mrs Babeva
Terziev, g.
Izgrev, Mrs Blagoeva, Litex Komers, MIKS, Foros Development, Mirta Engineering and Beta Forest
Babev in ga.
Izgrev, Litex Komers, MIKS, BOIL, Mirta Engineering, Beta Forest, Mr Mihailov and Mrs Mihailova, LM Impex
Babeva, MIKS in BOIL.
Mr Gerov, Mr Babev and Mrs Babeva and Mr Terziev
V primeru g.
Mr Stoev.
Mihajlova in ga.
The authorities indicated that in the period under review 567 private forest sales transactions took place.
Mihajlove naj bi bila vrednost zamenjanega zasebnega zemljišča (83322,66 BGN) višja od vrednosti zemljišča v javni lasti (67125,00 BGN).
Subsequently, in January 2009 the swaps of government land under the old rules and procedure were prohibited by law and the practice was discontinued.
G. Mihajlov in ga.
The Bulgarian authorities point to evidence showing that in 105 swap transactions the administrative swap price was higher than the market price obtained by private parties in arm’s-length transactions, while it was lower only in 13 cases.
Mihajlova, Mirta Engineering in Beta Forest (v zvezi z regijo Novo Orjahovo), Foros Development (v zvezi z občino Burgas) ter MIKS in BOIL (v zvezi z regijo Nesebar).
SG No 108/2006
MIKS, BOIL, Foros Development, Mirta Engineering in Beta Forest.
Order No RD 49-269/17.7.2007.
Izgrev, ga.
Decision No 602/16.9.2008.
Blagoeva, MIKSD, BOIL, Mirta Engineering, Beta Forest, g.
This information was (re)submitted by Bulgaria in a spreadsheet sent to the Commission by e-mail of 21 January 2014 (2014/032997).
Mihajlov in ga.
Submission reference 2013/115208.
Mihajlova.
Joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavlov and Others [2000] ECR I-6451, paragraph 74.
BOIL, g.
Case 118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599, paragraph 7; Case C-35/96 Commission v Italy [1998] ECR I-3851, paragraph 36; Joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavlov and Others [2000] ECR I-6451, paragraph 75.
Mihajlov in ga.
Case C-379/98 Preussen Elektra [2001] ECR I-2099.
Mihajlova.
See, by way of analogy, Case T 475/04 Bouygues SA v Commission [2007] ECR II-2097, paragraphs 108 to 111 and 123 upheld in Case C 431/07 P Bouygues and Bouygues Telecom v Commission [2009] ECR I-2665, paragraphs 94 to 98 and 125.
G. Gerov, g.
Case C-239/09 Seydaland Vereinigte Agrarbetriebe GmbH & Co.
Terziev ter g.
Case T-288/97 Friuli-Venezia Giulia [2001] ECR II-1169, paragraph 41.
Babeva.
This is, amongst others, the case for: All Seas Property 2, Aqua Estate, Beta Forest, BG Land Co, Ecobalkani, MIKS and BOIL.
Izgrev, ga.
This is the case, e.g. for Izgrev, Liteks Comers, LM Impex and VNG Confort.
Blagoeva, Litex Komers, MIKS, Foros Development, Mirta Engineering in Beta Forest.
Case C-239/09 Seydaland, cited above, paragraph 35.
Izgrev, Litex Komers, MIKS, BOIL, Mirta Engineering, Beta Forest, g.
See, also, Commission Decision of 19 December 2012 in Case SA.33167 on proposed alternative method for the valuation of agriculture and forest land in Germany sold by the public agency BVVG (OJ C 43, 15.2.2013, p.
Mihajlov in ga.
7).
Mihajlova, LM Impex.
See, by way of analogy, Title II, point 2(b), of the Commission communication on State aid elements in sales of land and buildings by public authorities (OJ C 209, 10.7.1997, p.
G. Gerov, g.
3).
Babev in ga.
Letter of 19 November 2013; submission reference 2013/115208.
Babeva ter g.
This issue, together with the Bulgarian arguments, is described in detail in Section 5.4.
Terziev.
Under- or overvaluation in comparison to the market price provided by the Bulgarian authorities for the plot concerned.
G. Stoev.
Case C-239/09 Seydaland, cited above, paragraph 54.
Organi so navedli, da je bilo v obdobju pregleda opravljenih 567 zasebnih prodaj gozda.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1407/2013 of 18 December 2013 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid (OJ L 352, 24.12.2013, p.
Nato je bila januarja 2009 menjava državnih zemljišč na podlagi starih pravil in postopkov prepovedana z zakonom in to ravnanje je bilo opuščeno.
1).
Bolgarski organi navajajo dokaze, iz katerih je razvidno, da je bila administrativna cena menjave pri 105 poslih menjave višja od tržne cene, ki so jo zasebne stranke dosegle pri poslih na strogo poslovni podlagi, medtem ko je bila nižja samo v 13 primerih.
The De minimis Regulation was adopted by the Commission pursuant to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 (OJ L 142, 14.5.1998, p.
SG št. 108/2006.
1), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 733/2013 (OJ L 204, 31.7.2013, p.
Sklep št.
11).
RD 49-269/17.7.2007.
On the basis of the preliminary calculations performed by the Commission on the quantitative data provided by the Bulgarian authorities, it would seem that in only 45 out of 104 cases where an advantage was granted to a private party as a result of a swap, that advantage exceeded the de minimus threshold.
Sklep št. 602/16.9.2008.
However, these calculations neither exclude those cases in which the beneficiary of the swap was not an undertaking (which would reduce the number of swaps constituting aid) nor do they account for those cases in which the same beneficiary benefitted from multiple swap transactions, the advantage of which exceed EUR 200000 in total (increasing the number of swaps constituting aid).
Bolgarija je te informacije (ponovno) predložila v preglednici, ki jo je Komisiji poslala po elektronski pošti 21. januarja 2014 (2014/032997).
More precise calculations should be carried out by the Bulgarian authorities in the context of recovery.
Sklic dopisa 2013/115208.
Case T-68/03 Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies/Commission [2007] ECR II-2911, paragraph 34.
Združene zadeve C-180/98 do C-184/98, Pavlov in drugi, Recueil 2000, str.
Paragraph 175(g) of the Forest Guidelines defines eligible costs as: ‘the costs of purchase of forest land used or to be used as nature protection areas.
I-6451, točka 74.
The forest land in question must be entirely and permanently secured for nature protection purposes by the means of a statutory or contractual obligation.’
Zadeva 118/85, Komisija proti Italiji, Recueil 1987, str.
The remaining categories of eligible costs defined in paragraph 175 of the Forest Guidelines are not appropriate in the case at hand.
2599, točka 7; zadeva C-35/96, Komisija proti Italiji, Recueil 1998, str.
For publicly owned forest land the difference between the market price and the administrative price ranges from – 6130,00 % to +74,98 %.
I-3851, točka 36; združene zadeve C-180/98 do C-184/98, Pavlov in drugi, Recueil 2000, str.
It should be noted, however, that the administrative price for such plots was higher than their market price only in 2 out of 23 cases.
I-6451, točka 75.
Case C-277/00 Germany v Commission [2002] ECR I-11695, paragraphs 74-76
Zadeva C-379/98, Preussen Elektra, Recueil 2001, str.
Case C-209/00 Germany v Commission, cited above, paragraph 57-58.
I-2099.
Case C-303/88 Italy v Commission [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraph 57; Case C-277/00 Germany v Commission (‘SMI’), [2004] ECR I-3925, paragraph 75.
Glej po analogiji zadevo T-475/04, Bouygues SA proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Case C-310/99 Italy v Commission [2002] ECR I-2289, paragraph 91.
2007, str.
Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/457
Sklep Sveta (EU, Euratom) 2015/457
repealing Decision 2007/124/EC, Euratom establishing for the period 2007 to 2013, as part of General Programme on Security and Safeguarding Liberties, the Specific Programme ‘Prevention, Preparedness and Consequence Management of Terrorism and other Security related risks’
o razveljavitvi Sklepa 2007/124/ES, Euratom o uvedbi posebnega programa „Preprečevanje, pripravljenost in obvladovanje posledic v zvezi s terorizmom ter drugimi tveganji, povezanimi z varnostjo“ kot dela Splošnega programa o varnosti in varstvu svoboščin, za obdobje 2007–2013
Council Decision 2007/124/EC, Euratom [1] establishes the Specific Programme ‘Prevention, Preparedness and Consequence Management of Terrorism and other Security related risks’ (‘the Programme’) covering the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013.
Sklep Sveta 2007/124/ES, Euratom [1] uvaja poseben program „Preprečevanje, pripravljenost in obvladovanje posledic v zvezi s terorizmom ter drugimi tveganji, povezanimi z varnostjo“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Program), ki zajema obdobje od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013.
A new regulation providing for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management as part of the Internal Security Fund is to be established for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 by Regulation (EU) No 513/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
V okviru Sklada za notranjo varnost se z Uredbo (EU) št. 513/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] uvede nova ureditev o finančni podpori na področju policijskega sodelovanja, preprečevanja kriminala in boja proti njemu ter kriznega upravljanja za obdobje od 1. januarja 2014 do 31. decembra 2020.
Decision 2007/124/EC, Euratom should therefore be repealed with effect from 1 January 2014,
Sklep 2007/124/ES, Euratom bi bilo zato treba razveljaviti z učinkom od 1. januarja 2014 –
Decision 2007/124/EC, Euratom is hereby repealed with effect from 1 January 2014.
Sklep 2007/124/ES, Euratom se razveljavi z učinkom od 1. januarja 2014.
The repeal provided for in Article 1 shall not affect the continuation or modification, including the total or partial cancellation, of projects covered by the Programme until their closure, or the financial assistance approved by the Commission on the basis of Decision 2007/124/EC, Euratom, or any other legal acts applying to that financial assistance on 31 December 2013.
Razveljavitev iz člena 1 ne vpliva na nadaljevanje ali spremembo projektov iz Programa, vključno z njihovim popolnim ali delnim preklicem, do njihovega zaključka ali na finančno pomoč, ki jo je Komisija odobrila na podlagi Sklepa 2007/124/ES, Euratom, ali na kateri koli drugi pravni akt, ki se za navedeno finančno pomoč uporablja 31. decembra 2013.
When adopting decisions on co-financing under the instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management as part of the Internal Security Fund, the Commission shall take account of measures adopted on the basis of Decision 2007/124/EC, Euratom before 20 March 2015 which have financial repercussions during the period covered by that co-financing.
Komisija pri sprejemanju sklepov o sofinanciranju v okviru instrumenta finančne podpore na področju policijskega sodelovanja, preprečevanja kriminala in boja proti njemu ter kriznega upravljanja v okviru Sklada za notranjo varnost upošteva ukrepe, ki so bili sprejeti na podlagi Sklepa 2007/124/ES, Euratom pred 20. marcem 2015 in imajo finančne posledice v obdobju, ki ga zajema navedeno sofinanciranje.
Sums committed for co-financing approved by the Commission between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2013 for which the documents required for closure of the operations have not been sent to the Commission by the deadline for submitting the final report shall be automatically decommitted by the Commission by 31 December 2017, giving rise to the repayment of amounts unduly paid.
Zneske, dodeljene za sofinanciranje, ki jih je v obdobju od 1. januarja 2011 do 31. decembra 2013 odobrila Komisija in za katere zahtevani dokumenti za zaključek ukrepov niso bili poslani Komisiji v roku za predložitev končnega poročila, Komisija samodejno sprosti do 31. decembra 2017, kar sproži vračilo neupravičeno izplačanih zneskov.
Amounts relating to operations which have been suspended due to legal proceedings or administrative appeals having suspensory effect shall be disregarded in calculating the amount to be automatically decommitted.
Zneski v zvezi z ukrepi, ki so bili začasno ustavljeni zaradi sodnih postopkov ali upravnih pritožb z odložitvenim učinkom, se ne upoštevajo pri izračunu zneska, ki se samodejno sprosti.
The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council, by 31 December 2015, a report on the results achieved and on quantitative aspects of the implementation of Decision 2007/124/EC, Euratom for the period from 2011 to 2013.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu do 31. decembra 2015 predloži poročilo o doseženih rezultatih ter o kvantitativnih vidikih izvajanja Sklepa 2007/124/ES, Euratom, za obdobje od 2011 do 2013.
This Decision shall enter into force on the same date as Regulation (EU) No 513/2014.
Ta sklep začne veljati na dan začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) št. 513/2014.