natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Whereas Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) [1] changes the name of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and it is appropriate in consequence to amend the Rules of Procedure to include in them a reference to the European Union Intellectual Property Office,With the agreement of the Court of Justice,
V členu 1(2)(g) Poslovnika Splošnega sodišča [2] se sklicevanje na „Urad za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli)“ nadomesti s sklicevanjem na „Urad Evropske unije za intelektualno lastnino“.
HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:
Ta sprememba Poslovnika, ki je verodostojna v jezikih iz člena 44 Poslovnika, se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati z dnem objave.
In Article 1(2)(g) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court [2], the reference to ‘the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘the European Union Intellectual Property Office’.
V Luxembourgu, 13. julija 2016
This amendment to the Rules of Procedure, authentic in the languages referred to in Article 44 of those Rules, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the day of its publication.
Sodni tajnik
Done at Luxembourg, 13 July 2016.
Predsednik
Registrar
UL L 341, 24.12.2015, str. 21.
President
Poslovnik Splošnega sodišča (UL L 105, 23.4.2015, str. 1).
OJ L 341, 24.12.2015, p.
Sprememba Poslovnika Splošnega sodišča
21.
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti njenega člena 254, peti odstavek,
M. Jaeger
s soglasjem Sodišča,
With the approval of the Council given on 6 July 2016, HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:
Odstavek 10 člena 105 Poslovnika Splošnega sodišča [1] se nadomesti s tem besedilom:„10.
Amendment of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court
Podatki ali dokazila iz odstavka 5, ki jih glavna stranka, ki jih je predložila, ni umaknila na podlagi odstavka 7, se zadevni stranki vrnejo takoj po izteku roka iz člena 56, prvi odstavek, Statuta, razen če je bila v tem roku vložena pritožba zoper odločbo Splošnega sodišča.
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the fifth paragraph of Article 254 thereof,
Če je bila taka pritožba vložena, se omenjeni podatki ali dokazila dajo na voljo Sodišču pod pogoji, določenimi v odločbi iz odstavka 11.“
Whereas the information or material that is confidential and relevant for the purpose of ruling on the dispute, which has been produced in accordance with Article 105 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court and has not been returned during the proceedings, must be made available to the Court of Justice in order that it may fully exercise its powers as a court of appeal should the General Court's decision at the end of proceedings in which the specific regime of Article 105 has been applied be challenged,
Ta sprememba Poslovnika, ki je verodostojna v jezikih iz člena 44 navedenega poslovnika, se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati z dnem objave.
Whereas, by contrast, that information or material must be returned to the main party that produced it if no appeal has been brought against the decision of the General Court within the time limit laid down by the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union,
UL L 105, 23.4.2015, str.
With the agreement of the Court of Justice,
Spremembe Poslovnika Splošnega sodišča
Paragraph 10 of Article 105 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court [1] is replaced by the following:‘10.
ob upoštevanju, da Uredba (EU, Euratom) 2016/1192 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. julija 2016 o prenosu pristojnosti za odločanje o sporih med Evropsko unijo in njenimi uslužbenci na prvi stopnji na Splošno sodišče [1], ki naj bi začela veljati 1. septembra 2016, določa, da Splošno sodišče izvršuje na prvi stopnji pristojnost za odločanje v sporih med Unijo in njenimi uslužbenci na podlagi člena 270 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), vključno s spori med vsemi institucijami in vsemi organi, uradi ali agencijami na eni strani ter njihovim osebjem na drugi, za katere je pristojnost dodeljena Sodišču Evropske unije,
The information or material referred to in paragraph 5, which has not been withdrawn pursuant to paragraph 7 by the main party that produced it, shall be returned to the party concerned as soon as the period referred to in the first paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute has expired, unless, within that period, an appeal has been brought against the decision of the General Court.
SPREJME TE SPREMEMBE SVOJEGA POSLOVNIKA:
Where such an appeal is brought, the abovementioned information or material shall be made available to the Court of Justice on the conditions laid down in the decision referred to in paragraph 11.’.
Poslovnik Splošnega sodišča [2] se spremeni tako:1.
OJ L 105, 23.4.2015, p.
besedilo v točki (i) nadomesti s tem besedilom:
1.
so 'direktne tožbe' tožbe, ki so vložene na podlagi člena 263 PDEU, člena 265 PDEU, člena 268 PDEU, člena 270 PDEU in člena 272 PDEU;“;
Article 1 Paragraph 10 of Article 105 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court [1] is replaced by the following:‘10.
doda točka (j), ki se glasi:
Amendments to the Rules of Procedure of the General Court
so 'Kadrovski predpisi za uradnike' Uredba o sprejetju Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropske unije in Pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Unije.“.
Whereas Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2016/1192 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 on the transfer to the General Court of jurisdiction at first instance in disputes between the European Union and its servants [1], which is due to take effect on 1 September 2016, provides that the General Court is to exercise at first instance jurisdiction in the disputes between the Union and its servants referred to in Article 270 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), including disputes between all institutions and all bodies, offices or agencies, on the one hand, and their servants, on the other, in respect of which jurisdiction is conferred on the Court of Justice of the European Union,
Člen 29 se spremeni tako, da:
HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:
se v odstavku 1(b) del stavka „v zadevah, vloženih na podlagi člena 263, četrti odstavek, PDEU, člena 265, tretji odstavek, PDEU in člena 268 PDEU“ nadomesti z „v zadevah, vloženih na podlagi člena 263, četrti odstavek, PDEU, člena 265, tretji odstavek, PDEU, člena 268 PDEU in člena 270 PDEU“;
The Rules of Procedure of the General Court [2] are hereby amended as follows:(1) in Article 1(2):
odstavek 2(b) postane odstavek 2(c);
the text in point (i) is replaced by the following:
se v odstavku 2 doda nova točka (b):
“direct actions” means actions brought on the basis of Articles 263 TFEU, 265 TFEU, 268 TFEU, 270 TFEU and 272 TFEU;’;
v tožbah, vloženih na podlagi člena 270 PDEU, v katerih je zoper splošni akt izrecno uveljavljan ugovor nezakonitosti, razen če je Sodišče ali Splošno sodišče o vprašanjih, ki se zastavljajo s tem ugovorom, že odločilo;“.
the following point (j) is added:
V členu 39(1) se besedilo prvega stavka nadomesti z besedilom:
“Staff Regulations” means the Regulation laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Union.’;
„Uradniki in drugi uslužbenci, katerih naloga je neposredna pomoč predsedniku, sodnikom in sodnemu tajniku, so imenovani v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v Kadrovskih predpisih za uradnike.“
Article 29 is amended as follows:
Člen 78 se spremeni tako, da se:
in paragraph 1(b), the words ‘cases brought pursuant to the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU, the third paragraph of Article 265 TFEU and Article 268 TFEU’ are replaced by ‘cases brought pursuant to the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU, the third paragraph of Article 265 TFEU, Article 268 TFEU and Article 270 TFEU’;
odstavki od 2 do 5 preštevilčijo in postanejo odstavki od 3 do 6;
paragraph 2(b) is renumbered paragraph 2(c);
vstavi to besedilo novega odstavka 2:
in paragraph 2, the following point is inserted as point (b):
Tožbi, vloženi na podlagi člena 270 PDEU, se po potrebi priložita pritožba iz člena 90(2) Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike in odločba o pritožbi z navedbo dneva vložitve pritožbe in dneva uradne obvestitve o odločbi.“
in an action brought pursuant to Article 270 TFEU in which a plea of illegality is expressly raised against an act of general application, unless the Court of Justice or the General Court has already given a ruling on the issues raised by that plea;’;
v odstavku 5, ki postane odstavek 6, besedilo „iz odstavkov od 1 do 4“ nadomesti z besedilom „iz odstavkov od 1 do 5“.
in Article 39(1), the first sentence is replaced by the following:
V členu 80(2) se del stavka „iz člena 78(5)“ nadomesti z besedilom „iz člena 78(6)“.
‘The officials and other servants whose task is to assist directly the President, the Judges and the Registrar shall be appointed under the conditions laid down by the Staff Regulations.’;
V členu 81(2) se besedilo „78, od (3) do (5).“ nadomesti z besedilom „78, od (4) do (6).“.
Article 78 is amended as follows:
Člen 86 se spremeni tako, da se:
paragraphs 2 to 5 are renumbered paragraphs 3 to 6;
odstavki od 3 do 6 preštevilčijo in postanejo odstavki od 4 do 7;
the following is inserted as paragraph 2:
doda nov odstavek 3 z besedilom:
An application submitted pursuant to Article 270 TFEU shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by the complaint within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations and the decision responding to the complaint, together with an indication of the dates on which the complaint was submitted and the decision notified.’;
V zadevah, vloženih na podlagi člena 270 PDEU, se prilagoditev tožbe izvede z ločenim aktom in – z odstopanjem od odstavka 2 – v roku, ki je določen v členu 91(3) Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike in v katerem se lahko predlaga razglasitev ničnosti akta, ki utemeljuje prilagoditev tožbe.“
in paragraph 5, which is renumbered paragraph 6, the reference to ‘paragraphs 1 to 4’ is replaced by a reference to ‘paragraphs 1 to 5’;
V členu 110 se doda odstavek 4, ki se glasi:
in Article 80(2), the reference to ‘Article 78(5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(6)’;
V zadevah, vloženih na podlagi člena 270 PDEU, lahko člani sestave in generalni pravobranilec med obravnavo stranke pozovejo, naj se same opredelijo glede nekaterih vidikov spora.“
in Article 81(2), the reference to ‘Article 78(3) to (5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4) to (6)’;
V členu 120 se črta del stavka „ali Sodišču za uslužbence“.
Article 86 is amended as follows:
V členu 124(1) se del stavka „Če se glavne stranke pred odločitvijo Splošnega sodišča sporazumejo o rešitvi spora“ nadomesti s „Če se glavne stranke pred odločitvijo Splošnega sodišča sporazumejo o rešitvi spora zunaj Splošnega sodišča“.
paragraphs 3 to 6 are renumbered paragraphs 4 to 7;
Po členu 125 se doda novo poglavje s štirimi členi:
the following is inserted as paragraph 3:
„Poglavje 11a
In cases brought pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, the modification of the application must be made by a separate document and, by way of derogation from paragraph 2, within the time limit laid down in Article 91(3) of the Staff Regulations within which the annulment of the measure justifying the modification of the application may be sought.’;
POSTOPEK MIRNEGA REŠEVANJA SPOROV, KI GA SPLOŠNO SODIŠČE UVEDE V ZADEVAH, VLOŽENIH NA PODLAGI ČLENA 270 PDEU
in Article 110, the following paragraph 4 is added:
Člen 125a
In cases brought pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, the members of the formation of the Court and the Advocate General may in the course of the hearing invite the parties themselves to express their views on certain aspects of the case.’;
Načini
in Article 120, the words ‘or on the Civil Service Tribunal’ are deleted;
Splošno sodišče lahko v vseh fazah postopka preučuje možnosti za mirno rešitev celotnega spora ali njegovega dela med glavnimi strankami.
in Article 124(1), the words ‘If, before the General Court has given its decision, the main parties reach a settlement of their dispute’ are replaced by the words ‘If, before the General Court has given its decision, the main parties reach an out-of-court settlement of their dispute’;
Splošno sodišče sodniku poročevalcu, ki mu pomaga sodni tajnik, naloži, naj poskusi doseči mirno rešitev spora.
after Article 125, a new chapter comprising four articles is added:
Sodnik poročevalec lahko predlaga enega ali več načinov za rešitev spora, sprejme primerne ukrepe, da olajša njegovo mirno rešitev, in izvede ukrepe, ki jih je za to sprejel.
‘Chapter 11a
Med drugim lahko:
PROCEDURE IN RELATION TO AMICABLE SETTLEMENTS INITIATED BY THE GENERAL COURT IN CASES BROUGHT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 270 TFEU
glavne stranke pozove, naj predložijo podatke ali pojasnila;
Article 125a
glavne stranke pozove, naj predložijo dokumente;
Procedure
povabi zastopnike glavnih strank, glavne stranke ali vsakega uradnika ali uslužbenca, ki se lahko pogaja o morebitnem sporazumu, na sestanke;
The General Court may, at all stages of the procedure, examine the possibilities of an amicable settlement of all or part of the dispute between the main parties.
ima na sestankih, omenjenih pod (c), ločene stike z vsako od glavnih strank, če te v to privolijo.
The General Court shall instruct the Judge-Rapporteur, assisted by the Registrar, to seek the amicable settlement of a dispute.
Odstavki od 1 do 3 se uporabljajo tudi v postopku za izdajo začasne odredbe.
The Judge-Rapporteur may propose one or more solutions capable of putting an end to the dispute, adopt appropriate measures with a view to facilitating its amicable settlement and implement the measures which he has adopted to that end.
Člen 125b
He may, in particular:
Učinek sporazuma glavnih strank
invite the main parties to supply information or particulars;
Če se glavne stranke pred sodnikom poročevalcem sporazumejo o rešitvi spora, lahko predlagajo, naj se o vsebini tega sporazuma naredi zapisnik, ki ga podpišeta sodnik poročevalec in sodni tajnik.
invite the main parties to produce documents;
Ta akt se vroči glavnim strankam in je javna listina.
invite to meetings the main parties' representatives, the main parties themselves or any official or servant of the institution empowered to negotiate an agreement;
Predsednik z obrazloženim sklepom zadevo izbriše iz vpisnika.
on the occasion of the meetings referred to in point (c), have contact with each of the main parties separately, if they consent to that.
Na predlog ene glavne stranke in s soglasjem nasprotne glavne stranke se vsebina sklenjenega sporazuma navede v sklepu o izbrisu.
Paragraphs 1 to 3 shall apply to proceedings for interim measures also.
Predsednik odloči o stroških v skladu s sporazumom ali, če sporazuma o stroških ni, po prostem preudarku.
Article 125b
Po potrebi odloči o stroških intervenienta v skladu s členom 138.
Effect of the main parties' agreement
Člen 125c
Where the main parties come to an agreement before the Judge-Rapporteur on a solution which brings the dispute to an end, they may request that the terms of that agreement be recorded in a document signed by the Judge-Rapporteur and by the Registrar.
Posebna vpisnik in spis
That document shall be served on the main parties and shall constitute an official record.
Dokazila, predložena v postopku mirnega reševanja sporov v smislu člena 125a, se:
The case shall be removed from the register by reasoned order of the President.
vpišejo v poseben vpisnik, za kateri ne velja ureditev iz členov 36 in 37;
At the request of a main party with the agreement of the other main party, the terms of the agreement reached by the main parties shall be recorded in the order removing the case from the register.
vložijo v spis, ki je ločen od spisa v zadevi.
The President shall give a decision as to costs in accordance with the agreement or, failing that, at his discretion.
Glavne stranke se seznanijo z dokazili, predloženimi v postopku mirnega reševanja sporov v smislu člena 125a, razen s tistimi, ki jih je vsaka od njih sodniku poročevalcu posredovala med ločenimi stiki, določenimi v členu 125a(3)(d).
Where appropriate, he shall give a decision as to the costs of an intervener in accordance with Article 138.
Glavne stranke lahko dostopajo do dokazil iz spisa iz odstavka 1, ki je ločen od spisa v zadevi, razen do dokazil, ki jih je katera od njih sodniku poročevalcu posredovala med ločenimi stiki, določenimi v členu 125a(3)(d).
Article 125c
Intervenient ne more dostopati do dokazil iz spisa iz odstavka 1, ki je ločen od spisa v zadevi.
Specific register and file
Stranke lahko v sodnem tajništvu vpogledajo v poseben vpisnik iz odstavka 1.
Material produced in the context of the amicable settlement procedure as provided for in Article 125a:
Člen 125d
shall be entered in a specific register which shall not be subject to the rules laid down in Articles 36 and 37,
Mirno reševanje sporov in sodni postopek
shall be placed in a file separate from the case file.
Splošno sodišče in glavne stranke mnenj, predlogov, ponudb, popuščanj ali dokumentov, ki so bili izraženi, dani oziroma predloženi z namenom mirne rešitve spora, v sodnem postopku ne morejo uporabiti.“
Material produced in the context of the amicable settlement procedure as provided for in Article 125a shall be brought to the attention of the main parties, with the exception of material which either of them has communicated to the Judge-Rapporteur in the separate meetings provided for in Article 125a(3)(d).
Člen 127 se spremeni tako, da se:
The main parties may have access to the material in the file separate from the case file as referred to in paragraph 1, with the exception of material which either of the main parties has communicated to the Judge-Rapporteur in the separate meetings provided for in Article 125a(3)(d).
besedilo naslova „Odstop zadeve Sodišču ali Sodišču za uslužbence zaradi nepristojnosti“ nadomesti z besedilom „Odstop zadeve Sodišču zaradi nepristojnosti“;
An intervener may not have access to material in the file separate from the case file as referred to in paragraph 1.
črta del stavka „in člena 8(2) Priloge I k Statutu“.
The parties may examine the specific register referred to in paragraph 1 at the Registry.
V členu 130(7) se besedilo drugega stavka „Zadevo odstopi Sodišču ali Sodišču za uslužbence, če spada v njuno pristojnost.“ nadomesti z besedilom „Zadevo odstopi Sodišču, če spada v njegovo pristojnost.“.
Article 125d
V členu 135(1) se črta beseda „izjemoma“.
Amicable settlement and judicial proceedings
V členu 143(4) se besedilo „78, od (3) do (5),“ nadomesti z besedilom „78, od (4) do (6),“.
No opinion expressed, suggestion made, proposal put forward, concession made or document drawn up for the purposes of the amicable settlement may be relied upon as evidence by the General Court or the main parties in the judicial proceedings.’;
V členu 147(5):
Article 127 is amended as follows:
se besedilo „78(3).“ nadomesti z besedilom „78(4).“;
the heading ‘Referral of a case to the Court of Justice or to the Civil Service Tribunal’ is replaced by ‘Referral of a case to the Court of Justice’;
se besedilo „78(5).“ nadomesti z besedilom „78(6).“.
the words ‘and in Article 8(2) of Annex I to the Statute’ are deleted;
Člen 156 se spremeni tako, da se:
in Article 130(7), the second sentence, ‘It shall refer the case to the Court of Justice or to the Civil Service Tribunal if the case falls within their jurisdiction.’ is replaced by ‘It shall refer the case to the Court of Justice if the case falls within the latter's jurisdiction.’;
odstavka 3 in 4 preštevilčita in postaneta odstavka 4 in 5;
in Article 135(1), the word ‘Exceptionally,’ is deleted;
V zadevah, vloženih na podlagi člena 270 PDEU, je mogoče predloge iz odstavkov 1 in 2 vložiti takoj po vložitvi pritožbe iz člena 90(2) Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike pod pogoji, ki jih določa člen 91(4) teh predpisov.“
in Article 143(4), the reference to ‘Article 78(3) to (5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4) to (6)’;
V členu 173(5) se besedilo „78, od (3) do (5).“ nadomesti z besedilom „78, od (4) do (6).“
in Article 147(5):
V členu 175(4) se besedilo „78, od (3) do (5),“ nadomesti z besedilom „78, od (4) do (6),“.
the reference to ‘Article 78(3).’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4).’;
Člen 193 se spremeni tako, da se:
the reference to ‘Article 78(5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(6)’;
v odstavku 1 črta del stavka „ali Sodišča za uslužbence“;
Article 156 is amended as follows:
črta odstavek 2;
paragraphs 3 and 4 are renumbered paragraphs 4 and 5;
črta številka pred odstavkom 1.
In cases brought pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, an application of a kind referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 may be presented as soon as the complaint under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations has been submitted, on the conditions laid down in Article 91(4) of those Regulations.’;
V členu 196(2) se besede „Sodišču za uslužbence“ nadomestijo z besedami „Splošnemu sodišču, ki odloča kot prvostopenjsko sodišče“, po besedah „Splošno sodišče“ pa se doda besedilo „, ki odloča kot pritožbeno sodišče“.
in Article 173(5), the reference to ‘Article 78(3) to (5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4) to (6)’;
V členu 213(3) se črta del stavka „in Sodišču za uslužbence“.
in Article 175(4), the reference to ‘Article 78(3) to (5)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘Article 78(4) to (6)’;
Te spremembe Poslovnika, ki so verodostojne v jezikih iz člena 44 navedenega poslovnika, se objavijo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začnejo veljati 1. septembra 2016.
Article 193 is amended as follows:
UL L 200, 26.7.2016, str.
paragraph 2 is deleted;
Poslovnik Splošnega sodišča (UL L 105, 23.4.2015, str.
in Article 196(2), the words ‘Civil Service Tribunal’ are replaced by ‘General Court ruling as a court of first instance’, and the words ‘ruling as a court of appeal’ are added after the words ‘General Court’;
Spremembe Praktičnih določb za izvajanje Poslovnika Splošnega sodišča
in Article 213(3), the words ‘and to the Civil Service Tribunal’ are deleted.
na podlagi člena 224 svojega poslovnika,
Rules of Procedure of the General Court (OJ L 105, 23.4.2015, p. 1).
Po točki 14 se vstavi točka 14a s tem besedilom:
Whereas Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2016/1192 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 on the transfer to the General Court of jurisdiction at first instance in disputes between the European Union and its servants [1], which is due to take effect on 1 September 2016, provides that the General Court is to exercise at first instance jurisdiction in the disputes between the Union and its servants referred to in Article 270 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), including disputes between all institutions and all bodies, offices or agencies, on the one hand, and their servants, on the other, in respect of which jurisdiction is conferred on the Court of Justice of the European Union, Whereas it is in consequence appropriate to amend the Rules of Procedure of the General Court,
V skladu s členom 125c Poslovnika se dokazila, predložena v postopku mirnega reševanja sporov iz členov od 125a do 125d Poslovnika, vpišejo v poseben vpisnik, za kateri ne velja ureditev iz členov 36 in 37 navedenega poslovnika.“
With the approval of the Council given on 6 July 2016, HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:
Po točki 24 se vstavi točka 24a s tem besedilom:
Amendments of the Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court
Dokazila, predložena v postopku mirnega reševanja sporov v smislu člena 125a Poslovnika, se vložijo v spis, ki je ločen od spisa v zadevi.“