natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The claim that there is no legal basis for these adaptations is therefore dismissed.
Po začasnem razkritju je pritožnik, čeprav se je strinjal, da je bila prilagoditev upravičena, ker je bil izvoz s Kitajske namenjen predvsem trgovcem v Uniji, medtem ko je bila prodaja proizvajalca Unije namenjena predvsem končnim uporabnikom, izrazil pomisleke glede obsega prilagoditve, izvedene za izračun normalne vrednosti na ravni trgovcev.
Adaptation for level of trade
Zaradi omejenega deleža prodaje distributerjem na seznamu prodaje industrije Unije se ti podatki niso mogli uporabiti za oblikovanje ustrezne prilagoditve za te razlike v ravni trgovanja, zato je bila stopnja prilagoditve začasno izračunana na podlagi razlike v ceni med kitajsko prodajo trgovcem in končnim uporabnikom.
After provisional disclosure, the complainant, although agreeing that an adaptation was warranted because the export sales from China were made mainly to traders in the Union while the sales of the Union producer were mainly made to end users, questioned the magnitude of the adaptation made to arrive at a normal value at traders' level.
Pritožnik je nasprotoval ustreznosti te podlage in pripomnil, da bi morala biti prilagoditev za raven trgovanja določena z bruto maržo treh velikih distributerjev Unije v industriji živilskih sestavin, ki so vsi distribuirali Ace-K.
Due to the limited presence of sales to distributors in the Union industry sales listing, those data could not be used for establishing an appropriate adaptation rate for these differences in level of trade and the adaptation rate was therefore provisionally calculated on the basis of the price difference between Chinese sales to traders and end users.
Komisija je priznala, da je v tej zadevi ustrezneje izračunati stopnjo prilagoditve na podlagi bruto marž zadevnih distributerjev.
The complainant contested that this was an appropriate basis and commented that the level of trade adaptation should have been determined by the gross margin realised by three large Union distributors in the food ingredients industry, each of which distributed Ace-K.
Vendar je imela metodologija, ki jo je predlagal pritožnik, pomanjkljivosti, saj je sodeloval le eden od distributerjev, ki jih je navedel pritožnik, podatki pa so zadevali vse izdelke, s katerimi trgujejo ti uvozniki, in večina od njih niso zadevni izdelek.
The Commission accepted that, in this case, it is more appropriate to calculate the adaptation rate on the basis of gross margins obtained by relevant distributors.
Zato je Komisija prilagodila predlagano metodologijo, da bi se vključili podatki, ki so bili preverjeni med preiskavo in so se nanašali samo na Ace-K.
However, the methodology as proposed by the complainant presented flaws as only one of the distributors mentioned by the complainant cooperated and the data concerned all products traded by these importers, most of which are not product concerned.
V ta namen je Komisija določila bruto maržo, ki so jo dosegli vsi sodelujoči uvozniki.
Therefore, the Commission adapted the proposed methodology in order to include data which was verified during the investigation and which concerned Ace-K only.
Ta marža se nanaša le na distribucijo Ace-K.
To this end, the Commission determined the gross margin realised by all cooperating importers.
Rezultat te spremenjene metodologije je bila spremenjena stopnja prilagoditve za raven trgovanja v primerjavi s stopnjo, uporabljeno v začasni fazi.
This margin concerns the distribution of Ace-K only.
Ta spremenjena stopnja je bila uporabljena in je izražena v stopnji dampinga v preglednici iz uvodne izjave 53 v nadaljevanju.
This revised methodology resulted in a revised level of trade adaptation rate as compared to the one used at the provisional stage.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je podal pripombo glede dejstva, da mu začasna stopnja prilagoditve za razlike v ravni trgovanja ni bila razkrita.
That revised rate was applied and is reflected in the dumping margin in the table under recital 53 below.
Stopnja ni več pomembna, saj je bila nadomeščena, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 24 zgoraj.
One Chinese exporting producer commented on the fact that the provisional rate for the adaptation for differences in level of trade was not disclosed to them.
Ker je začasna prilagoditev temeljila na podatkih dveh sodelujočih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki sta oba prodajala tako trgovcem kot uporabnikom, se natančen znesek v vsakem primeru nanaša na zaupne poslovne podatke in se ne sme razkriti.
The rate is not anymore of relevance as it has been replaced as explained in recital 24 above.
Prilagoditev za razliko v kakovosti in njeno tržno dojemanje
In any event, as the provisional adaptation had been based on data from two Chinese cooperating exporting producers with sales to both traders and users, the exact amount concerns confidential business data and cannot be disclosed.
Glede prilagoditve za kakovost je pritožnik sprva trdil, da ni bilo nobene razlike v kakovosti med kitajskim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom, ki ga proizvaja proizvajalec Unije, in zato ni bila upravičena nobena prilagoditev.
Adaptation for quality difference and the market perception thereof
Pritožnik je tudi podvomil o reprezentativnosti dokazov, na podlagi katerih je Komisija upoštevala razlike v kakovosti in njenem dojemanju na trgu za določitev normalne vrednosti.
Regarding the quality adaptation, the complainant first argued that there was no quality difference between the Chinese product and the like product produced by the Union producer and that therefore no adaptation was warranted.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba poudariti, da so bila predložena različna stališča, ki so navajala razlike v kakovosti in/ali tržnem dojemanju razlike v kakovosti med kitajskim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom v Uniji.
The complainant further questioned the representativeness of the evidence based on which the Commission reflected the quality differences and the perception thereof in the market in the establishment of the normal value.
Iz informacij, ki jih je predložil pritožnik v fazi pritožbe in jih objavil na svojem spletnem mestu, je bilo dejansko jasno videti, da obstaja razlika v kakovosti.
In this respect, it should be underlined that there were various submissions which indicated quality differences and/or market perceptions of quality differences between the Chinese product and the like product in the Union.
Nekatera stališča, ki so večinoma omejene narave, vključujejo poročila o preskusih in pisna stališča, prejeta od zainteresiranih strani.
In fact, information submitted by the complainant at complaint stage and on its own website clearly indicated that a quality difference existed.
Zato se reprezentativnost dokazov, na podlagi katerih je bilo ugotovljeno, da je dejansko obstajala resnična razlika in/ali razlika v dojemanju kakovosti med uvoženim izdelkom in Ace-K, ki ga proizvaja proizvajalec Unije, šteje za zadostno.
Some submissions, mostly limited of nature, include test reports and written submissions received from interested parties.
Poleg tega so specifikacije izdelkov, zbrane med preveritvenimi obiski proizvajalcev Unije, kitajskih proizvajalcev in uvoznikov, potrdile to razliko v kakovosti, saj so bile vidne znatne razlike v smislu standardov čistosti med izdelkom, ki ga prodaja pritožnik in izdelkom, ki ga prodajajo proizvajalci izvozniki.
Therefore, the representativeness of the evidence based on which it was concluded that indeed there was a real and/or perceived difference of quality between the imported product and Ace-K produced by the Union producer is deemed to be sufficient.
Zato je prilagoditev upravičena.
Furthermore, the product specifications collected during the verification visits of the Union industry, Chinese producers and importers confirmed this quality difference as they revealed significant differences in terms of purity standards between the product sold by the complainant and the product sold by the exporting producers.
Poleg tega, kar zadeva znesek prilagoditve, ta temelji na podlagi edine količinske opredelitve razlike v kakovosti v omejenem spisu, ki ga je v enem izmed svojih stališč predložila sama industrija Unije.
An adaptation is therefore warranted.
Komisija je tudi ugotovila, da so stroški preskušanja in izboljšanja standardov kakovosti Ace-K, ki ga prodaja en kitajski proizvajalec, kakor je bilo preverjeno na kraju samem v prostorih sodelujočega uvoznika, približno enaki znesku prilagoditve, ki ga je uvedla Komisija, kar potrjuje, da je raven prilagoditve razumna.
Moreover, as concerns the amount of the adaptation, this is based on the sole quantification of the quality difference in the limited file, provided in a submission by the Union industry itself.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da kakovost njegovega Ace-K ni le nižja od kakovosti proizvajalca Unije, temveč tudi od kakovosti njegovih dveh kitajskih konkurentov.
The Commission also found that the cost of testing and improving the quality standards of Ace-K sold by one Chinese producer, as verified on-the-spot at the premises of a cooperating importer, is approximately of the same amount as the adaptation made by the Commission, which confirmed that the amount of the adaptation is reasonable.
Trdil je, da bi morala biti zato prilagoditev za kakovost za njegov izdelek višja.
One Chinese exporting producer claimed that the quality of its Ace-K is not only lower compared to that of the Union producer but also compared to those of its two Chinese competitors.
Dokazila o tem so obsegala poročila o preskusih njegovega izdelka v primerjavi z izdelkom drugega sodelujočega kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika ter izjavo uvoznika v Uniji.
It claimed that the quality adaptation made for its product should therefore be higher.
Ta uvoznik je navedel, da je zadevni izdelek kupoval od tega kitajskega proizvajalca po nižji ceni, saj je izdelek domnevno slabše kakovosti v primerjavi z izdelkom njegovega kitajskega konkurenta.
Evidence supporting this concerned test reports comparing its product with that of one other Chinese cooperating exporting producer and a statement issued by an importer in the Union.
Ta trditev ni bila sprejeta, saj so bila predložena poročila o preskusih datirana pred obdobjem preiskave.
This importer stated to have purchased the product concerned from this particular Chinese producer at a lower price as its product is allegedly of lower quality compared to that of its Chinese competitor.
Obstaja možnost, da se je kakovost zadevnega izdelka kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika odtlej izboljšala.
This claim was not accepted, as the test reports submitted were dated prior to the investigation period.
Poleg tega so bili, čeprav je bila v okviru trditve o slabši kakovosti navedena primerjava z obema drugima sodelujočima kitajskima proizvajalcema, v poročilih o preskusih izdelki kitajskega proizvajalca, ki je predložil zgornjo trditev, primerjani le z enim sodelujočim kitajskim proizvajalcem.
The quality of the product concerned from the Chinese exporting producer may well have improved since.
Kar zadeva izjavo, ki jo je podal uvoznik, se je tudi ta nanašala zgolj na izdelek kitajskega proizvajalca, ki je predložil zgornjo trditev, in še na enega sodelujočega kitajskega proizvajalca.
Furthermore, though the claim of inferior quality was made vis-à-vis both of the other two cooperating Chinese producers, the test reports compared the products of the Chinese producer making the above claim with only one other Chinese cooperating producer.
Poleg tega niso bili predloženi nikakršni preverljivi dokazi v podporo tej izjavi (na primer računi z navedbo nižje kakovosti in/ali nakupne cene).
As for the statement issued by the importer, this also only concerned the product of the Chinese producer making the above claim and one other Chinese cooperating producer.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega Komisija meni, da so izvedene prilagoditve za kakovost upravičene in na ustrezni ravni.
In addition, no verifiable evidence supporting the statement (such as invoices indicating lower quality and/or purchase prices) was provided.
Zato se prilagoditev cen v Uniji, ki odraža razlike v kakovosti, potrdi.
Based on the above, the Commission considers the quality adaptation made to be justified and at the appropriate level.
Prilagoditev za R&R in trženje, povezana z dejavnostmi glede zelo specifičnega in drugačnega izdelka, ki ga je razvil pritožnik
The adaptation to the Union prices to reflect the quality differences is therefore confirmed.
Pritožnik je po začasnem razkritju pripomnil, da Komisija ni podala pojasnila, zakaj so bili stroški, ki so povezani z njegovim novo razvitim izdelkom odšteti od normalne vrednosti, in trdil, da prilagoditev ni bila upravičena.
R & D and marketing adaptation related to activities for a very specific and different product developed by the complainant
V zvezi s tem je treba najprej opozoriti, da so bili stroški v zvezi z novo razvitimi izdelki odšteti dosledno med celotno analizo dampinga in škode, saj so ti stroški povezani z zelo specifičnim in drugačnim izdelkom, ki ga je razvil pritožnik (glej uvodne izjave od 12 do 14).
Following provisional disclosure, the complainant commented that the Commission did not provide any explanation as to why costs relating to its newly developed product had been deducted from the normal value and argued that no adaptation was warranted.
Noben kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, za katere se šteje, da so generični proizvajalci zadevnega izdelka, ni imel tovrstnih stroškov.
Second, as the new product was still in the process of being fully launched, only very limited quantities of sales had taken place in the investigation period, of which the sales prices were in any event not representative.
Vendar, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 21 zgoraj, je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi člena 2(7) osnovne uredbe in ugotovljeno je bilo, da je ta prilagoditev za določitev normalne vrednosti na razumni podlagi upravičena v skladu s pogoji iz tega člena.
No such costs had been incurred by any of the Chinese exporting producers, which are considered to be generic producers of the product concerned.
Poleg tega je jasno, da so na določanje cen industrije Unije vplivali ti stroški (večinoma stroški R&R in trženja), povezani z novim in zelo specifičnim ter drugačnim izdelkom.
Therefore, in order to determine the normal value under Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation on a reasonable basis, the Commission considered it reasonable to make an adaptation by excluding the costs related to the new product from the normal value computation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so bili ti stroški dodeljeni za dejavnost Ace-K, zato je logično, da je zadevna družba pri določanju cen upoštevala, da se ji bodo povrnili.
The complainant also contested the adaptation as such on the basis that costs were deducted from prices, stating that there would be no legal basis for doing so under Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation and that by doing so the Commission would ‘mix apples with oranges’.
Dejansko je industrija Unije v svojem odgovoru na vprašalnik potrdila, da so proizvodni stroški dejavnik, ki se upošteva v postopku oblikovanja cen.
However, as explained in recital 21 above, the normal value has been established on the basis of Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation and this adaptation was found to be warranted under the terms of this Article to determine a normal value on a reasonable basis.
Pritožnik je prav tako spodbijal višino prilagoditve, saj je menil, da je bila previsoka.
In addition, it was clear that the price setting of the Union industry was affected by these (R & D and mainly marketing) costs related to a new a very specific and different product.
Trdil je, da domnevne razlike v stroških razvoja in trženja za trg Unije v primerjavi z drugimi trgi upravičujejo nižji znesek na kg.
Indeed, the investigation showed that those costs were allocated to the Ace-K activity and it is therefore logical that the company concerned, in its price setting, takes account of them in order to recover these costs.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba najprej poudariti, da pritožnik te razlike v stroških glede na trg ni navedel med preiskavo kljub dejstvu, da je bil zaprošen, naj poda razčlenitev teh stroškov razvoja in trženja.
In fact it was confirmed by the Union Industry in its questionnaire response that cost of production is a factor considered in price formation process.
Drugič, teh podatkov ni bilo mogoče preveriti med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem.
The complainant also challenged the magnitude of the adaptation, which it considered too high.
Prav nasprotno pa je prilagoditev, ki jo je izračunala Komisija, temeljila na preverjenih podatkih pritožnika.
It submitted that a lower amount per kg was justified by alleged differences in development and marketing costs for the Union market as compared to other markets.
Komisija zato meni, da pritožnik ni predložil dokazov, ki bi izkazovali, da je stopnja prilagoditve nerazumna.
In this respect, it should first be underlined that this distinction in costs per market was not made by the complainant during the investigation despite the fact that it had been requested to give a breakdown of these development and marketing costs.
Vsekakor ni bilo videti smiselno, da bi se na ta način ponovno ocenil en element splošnih in upravnih stroškov, ostali pa ne.
Secondly, these figures could not be verified during the on spot verification.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se ta trditev ne more sprejeti.
This contrasts with the adaptation as calculated by the Commission, as it was based on verified data from the complainant.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je Komisijo pozval, naj razkrije točen znesek prilagoditve za dejavnosti, povezane z zelo specifičnim in drugačnim izdelkom, ki ga je razvil pritožnik.
The Commission therefore considers that the complainant has not brought evidence demonstrating that the level of the adaptation would be unreasonable.
Toda tega ni bilo mogoče razkriti, saj gre za podatke zaupne narave.
In any event, it was not considered prudent to reassess one element of SG&A costs in this manner and not others.
Znesek treh prilagoditev, ki jih je Komisija izvedla za določitev normalne vrednosti na razumni podlagi, predstavlja med 25 % in 45 % prodajne cene industrije Unije.
In view of the above, this claim cannot be accepted.
Terjatve v zvezi z drugimi prilagoditvami
One Chinese exporting producer asked the Commission to disclose the exact amount of the adaptation made for activities related to a very specific and different product developed by the complainant.
Kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, je Komisija pri določanju normalne vrednosti na razumni podlagi kot izhodišče uporabila dejanske povprečne prodajne cene Unije, ki so bile ustrezno preverjene.
However, this could not be disclosed, as this is confidential by nature.
Po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev je industrija Unije izpodbijala uporabo dejanskih prodajnih cen kot izhodišča.
The amount of the three adaptations made by the Commission to determine the normal value on a reasonable basis represents between 25 % and 45 % of the Union sale price of the Union industry.
Zlasti je trdila, da bi bilo treba tem dejanskim cenam prišteti „razumno stopnjo dobička“.
Claims for other adaptations
Po mnenju pritožnika bi bila stopnja dobička, dosežena leta 2009 (med 15 % in 25 %), „razumna stopnja dobička“, ker pritožnik ni imel prevladujočega položaja in je njegov tržni delež v tem letu upadel na manj kot 50 %.
As explained above, in its determination of the normal value on a reasonable basis, the Commission used as its starting point the actual average Union sales price, duly verified.
Domnevno v letu 2009 še ni prišlo do dampinga in škode.
Following disclosure of provisional findings, the Union industry contested the use of actual sales prices as a starting point.
V uvodni izjavi 66 začasne uredbe je že bilo pojasnjeno, da je bila prodaja proizvajalca Unije neodvisnim strankam dobičkonosna.
In particular, it argued that ‘a reasonable profit margin’ should have been added to those actual prices.
Točna dobičkonosnost tako izračunane prodaje je zaupna v razmerju do oseb, ki niso proizvajalec Unije, zato je bila dobičkonosnost v preglednici 10 začasne uredbe predstavljena v indeksirani obliki, bila pa je višja od 5 %, kar je razumno v industriji sintetičnih sladil.
In the complainant's view, the profit margin realised in 2009 (ranging between 15 % and 25 %) would have been ‘a reasonable profit margin’, as the complainant had no dominant position with its market share having dropped to below 50 % in that year.
Natančni znesek je bil razkrit pritožniku.
Allegedly, dumping and injury had not yet occurred in 2009.
Poleg tega je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi člena 2(7) osnovne uredbe.
In recital 66 of the provisional Regulation it was already explained that the sales of the Union producer to independent customers were profitable.
Kot izhodišče so bile uporabljene cene industrije Unije, ki so bile prilagojene za elemente, povezane s posebnimi dejavniki oblikovanja cen industrije Unije, in dejavnosti, ki se nanašajo na zelo specifičen in drugačen izdelek, ki ga je razvil pritožnik.
The exact profitability of these sales thus calculated is confidential towards parties other than the Union producer and profitability had therefore been presented in indexes in Table 10 of the provisional Regulation, but it was above 5 %, which in the synthetic sweeteners industry is reasonable.
Ta metoda se je štela za razumno zaradi posebnih okoliščin tega primera in informacij na voljo v spisu.
The exact figure has been disclosed to the complainant.
Za določitev normalne vrednosti na razumni podlagi in ponovni izračun normalne vrednosti torej ni bila potrebna nadomestitev dejanskega dobička s ciljnim dobičkom, kakor je trdil pritožnik.
Furthermore, normal value was established on the basis of Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
Union industry prices were used as a starting point and were adapted for elements related to Union industry specific factors of price formation and activities related to a very specific and different product developed by the complainant.
Poleg tega je pritožnik opozoril na računsko napako na seznamu prodaje v Uniji, ki je bil podlaga za izračun normalne vrednosti.
This method was considered reasonable in view of the specific facts of this case and information available on file.
Ta napaka je bila popravljena in popravek je prikazan v preglednici v uvodni izjavi 53 v nadaljevanju.
Therefore, there was no need to replace the actual profit by a target profit to determine the normal value on a reasonable basis and recalculate normal value as was claimed by the complainant.
Pripombe po končnem razkritju
The claim is thus rejected.
V svojem odgovoru na dokončno razkritje je pritožnik nasprotoval temu, da je Komisija znesek odbitka za razlike v ravni trgovanja izračunala na podlagi celotne cene franko tovarna industrije Unije, saj je ta cena vključevala izredne stroške za R&R in trženje za zelo specifičen in drugačen izdelek, ki ga je razvil pritožnik.
Finally, the complainant identified a computational error concerning the Union sales listing which was the basis for the normal value.
Menil je, da bi morala biti izračunana na podlagi prilagojene cene franko tovarna industrije Unije po odbitku teh izrednih stroškov.
This error was corrected and the correction is reflected in the table under recital 53 below.
Toda stopnja prilagoditve za raven trgovanja, kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj v uvodni izjavi 24, je tehtana povprečna bruto marža, ki so jo dosegli sodelujoči uvozniki z distribucijo Ace-K.
Comments after final disclosure
Zato bi jo bilo treba uporabiti pri dejanskih prodajnih cenah, saj je to prilagoditev za odpravo objektivnih razlik v prodajnih cenah, kot so bile opredeljene na trgu.
In its reply to the definitive disclosure the complainant contested that the Commission had calculated the amount of the deduction for differences in level of trade on the basis of the full Union industry ex-works price, as that price included the exceptional R & D and marketing costs for a very specific and different product developed by the complainant.
Prilagoditev za raven trgovanja je tesno povezana s cenami na trgu.