natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The information to be given should depend on the circumstances of the case.
Kadar je otroku odvzeta prostost, bi morale biti v obvestilu o pravicah, ki se mu zagotovi v skladu z Direktivo 2012/13/EU, navedene tudi otrokove pravice iz te direktive.
Children should receive information in respect of the right to a medical examination at the earliest appropriate stage in the proceedings, at the latest upon deprivation of liberty where such a measure is taken in relation to the child.
Države članice bi morale obvestiti nosilca starševske odgovornosti o ustreznih procesnih pravicah, in sicer pisno, ustno ali oboje.
Where a child is deprived of liberty, the Letter of Rights provided to the child pursuant to Directive 2012/13/EU should include clear information on the child's rights under this Directive.
Te informacije bi bilo treba zagotoviti čim prej in tako podrobno, kolikor je to potrebno za zaščito poštenosti postopka in učinkovito uveljavljanje pravic otroka.
Member States should inform the holder of parental responsibility about applicable procedural rights, in writing, orally, or both.
V nekaterih okoliščinah, ki se lahko nanašajo tudi samo na enega od nosilcev starševske odgovornosti, bi bilo treba informacije zagotoviti drugi ustrezni odrasli osebi, ki jo imenuje otrok in ki jo kot tako sprejme pristojni organ.
The information should be provided as soon as possible and in such detail as is necessary to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings and the effective exercise of the rights of the child.
Ena od takih okoliščin nastane, ko objektivni in dejanski razlogi kažejo ali zbujajo sum, da bi zagotavljanje informacij nosilcu starševske odgovornosti lahko povzročilo resno tveganje za kazenski postopek, zlasti v primeru, ko bi lahko prišlo do uničenja ali spreminjanja dokazov, do vplivanja na priče ali ko bi bil nosilec starševske odgovornosti lahko soudeležen pri domnevni kaznivi dejavnosti skupaj z otrokom.
In certain circumstances, which can also relate to only one of the persons holding parental responsibility, the information should be provided to another appropriate adult nominated by the child and accepted as such by the competent authority.
Če okoliščine, zaradi katerih so pristojni organi informacije zagotovili ustrezni odrasli osebi, ki ni nosilec starševske odgovornosti, prenehajo, se vse informacije, ki jih otrok prejme v skladu s to direktivo in ki so še vedno pomembne v teku postopka, zagotovijo nosilcu starševske odgovornosti.
One of those circumstances is where there are objective and factual grounds indicating or giving rise to the suspicion that providing information to the holder of parental responsibility could substantially jeopardise the criminal proceedings, in particular, where evidence might be destroyed or altered, witnesses might be interfered with, or the holder of parental responsibility might have been involved in the alleged criminal activity together with the child.
Zaradi te zahteve se kazenski postopek ne bi smel nepotrebno podaljšati.
Where the circumstances which led the competent authorities to provide information to an appropriate adult other than the holder of parental responsibility cease to exist, any information that the child receives in accordance with this Directive, and which remains relevant in the course of the proceedings, should be provided to the holder of parental responsibility.
Otroci, ki so osumljene ali obdolžene osebe, imajo pravico do dostopa do odvetnika v skladu z Direktivo 2013/48/EU.
This requirement should not unnecessarily prolong the criminal proceedings.
Ker so otroci ranljivi ter ne morejo vedno povsem razumeti kazenskega postopka in mu slediti, bi morali imeti pomoč odvetnika v primerih, določenih v tej direktivi.
Children who are suspects or accused persons have the right of access to a lawyer in accordance with Directive 2013/48/EU.
V takšnih primerih bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da ima otrok pomoč odvetnika, če otrok ali imetnik starševske odgovornosti ni sam poskrbel za takšno pomoč.
Since children are vulnerable and not always able to fully understand and follow criminal proceedings, they should be assisted by a lawyer in the situations set out in this Directive.
Države članice bi morale dodeliti brezplačno pravno pomoč, kadar je potrebna za zagotovitev, da odvetnik otroku pomoč nudi učinkovito.
In those situations, Member States should arrange for the child to be assisted by a lawyer where the child or the holder of parental responsibility has not arranged such assistance.
Pomoč odvetnika iz te direktive temelji na predpostavki, da ima otrok pravico do dostopa do odvetnika na podlagi Direktive 2013/48/EU.
Member States should provide legal aid where this is necessary to ensure that the child is effectively assisted by a lawyer.
Zato se v primeru, da zaradi uporabe določbe Direktive 2013/48/EU ne bi bilo mogoče, da odvetnik otroku nudi pomoč v skladu s to direktivo, taka določba ne bi smela uporabljati za pravico otrok do dostopa do odvetnika iz Direktive 2013/48/EU.
Assistance by a lawyer under this Directive presupposes that the child has the right of access to a lawyer under Directive 2013/48/EU.
Po drugi strani odstopanja in izjeme glede pomoči odvetnika, določene v tej direktivi, ne bi smele vplivati na pravico do dostopa do odvetnika v skladu z Direktivo 2013/48/EU ali pravico do brezplačne pravne pomoči v skladu z Listino in EKČP ter nacionalnim pravom in drugim pravom Unije.
Therefore, where the application of a provision of Directive 2013/48/EU would make it impossible for the child to be assisted by a lawyer under this Directive, such provision should not apply to the right of children to have access to a lawyer under Directive 2013/48/EU.
Določbe iz te direktive o pomoči odvetnika bi se morale uporabljati brez nepotrebnega odlašanja od trenutka, ko se otrok seznani, da je osumljena ali obdolžena oseba.
On the other hand, the derogations and exceptions to assistance by a lawyer laid down in this Directive should not affect the right of access to a lawyer in accordance with Directive 2013/48/EU, or the right to legal aid in accordance with the Charter and the ECHR, and with national and other Union law.
Za namene te direktive pomoč odvetnika pomeni, da odvetnik otroku zagotovi pravno podporo in zastopanje v kazenskem postopku.
The provisions laid down in this Directive on assistance by a lawyer should apply without undue delay once children are made aware that they are suspects or accused persons.
Kadar ta direktiva določa pomoč odvetnika med zaslišanjem, bi moral biti odvetnik navzoč.
For the purposes of this Directive, assistance by a lawyer means legal support and representation by a lawyer during the criminal proceedings.
Brez poseganja v otrokovo pravico do dostopa do odvetnika na podlagi Direktive 2013/48/EU pomoč odvetnika ne pomeni, da bi moral biti odvetnik navzoč pri vsakem preiskovalnem dejanju ali dejanju zbiranja dokazov.
Where this Directive provides for the assistance by a lawyer during questioning, a lawyer should be present.
Pod pogojem, da je to skladno s pravico do poštenega sojenja, obveznost držav članic, da otrokom, ki so osumljene ali obdolžene osebe, zagotovijo pomoč odvetnika v skladu s to direktivo, ne vključuje naslednjega: identifikacije otroka; ugotavljanja, ali je treba sprožiti preiskavo; preverjanja, ali je oseba oborožena oziroma ali obstajajo druga podobna varnostna vprašanja; izvajanja preiskovalnega dejanja ali dejanja zbiranja dokazov – razen tistih, ki so posebej navedeni v tej direktivi – kot so telesni pregledi, fizični pregledi, krvne preiskave, preizkusi alkoholiziranosti ali podobni preizkusi ali fotografiranje in odvzem prstnih odtisov; ali privedbe otroka pred pristojni organ ali predaje otroka nosilcu starševske odgovornosti ali drugi ustrezni odrasli osebi v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
Without prejudice to a child's right of access to a lawyer pursuant to Directive 2013/48/EU, assistance by a lawyer does not require a lawyer to be present during each investigative or evidence-gathering act.
Kadar otrok, ki prvotno ni bil osumljena ali obdolžena oseba, na primer priča, postane takšna oseba, bi moral imeti pravico, da ne izpove zoper sebe, in pravico do molka v skladu s pravom Unije ter EKČP, kot ju razlagata Sodišče Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sodišče) in Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice.
Provided that this complies with the right to a fair trial, the obligation for Member States to provide children who are suspects or accused persons with assistance by a lawyer in accordance with this Directive does not include the following: identifying the child; determining whether an investigation should be started; verifying the possession of weapons or other similar safety issues; carrying out investigative or evidence-gathering acts other than those specifically referred to in this Directive, such as body checks, physical examinations, blood, alcohol or similar tests, or the taking of photographs or fingerprints; or bringing the child to appear before a competent authority or surrendering the child to the holder of parental responsibility or to another appropriate adult, in accordance with national law.
Ta direktiva se zato izrecno sklicuje na praktičen primer, v katerem tak otrok postane osumljena ali obdolžena oseba med zaslišanjem s strani policije ali drugega organa za preprečevanje, odkrivanja in preiskovanje kaznivih dejanj v okviru kazenskega postopka.
Where a child who was not initially a suspect or accused person, such as a witness, becomes a suspect or accused person, that child should have the right not to incriminate him or herself and the right to remain silent, in accordance with Union law and the ECHR, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union (Court of Justice) and by the European Court of Human Rights.
Če med takim zaslišanjem otrok, ki ni osumljena ali obdolžena oseba, postane takšna oseba, bi bilo treba zaslišanje prekiniti, dokler se otrok ne seznani, da je osumljena ali obdolžena oseba, in dokler nima pomoči odvetnika v skladu s to direktivo.
This Directive therefore makes express reference to the practical situation where such a child becomes a suspect or accused person during questioning by the police or by another law enforcement authority in the context of criminal proceedings.
Pod pogojem, da je to skladno s pravico do poštenega sojenja, bi morale države članice imeti možnost odstopati od obveznosti zagotavljanja pomoči odvetnika, če to ni sorazmerno glede na okoliščine zadeve, pri čemer se razume, da se vedno upošteva predvsem korist otroka.
Where, in the course of such questioning, a child other than a suspect or accused person becomes a suspect or accused person, questioning should be suspended until the child is made aware that he or she is a suspect or accused person and is assisted by a lawyer in accordance with this Directive.
V vsakem primeru bi moral otrok imeti pomoč odvetnika, ko je, da se odloči o pridržanju v kateri koli fazi postopka v okviru te direktive, priveden pred pristojno sodišče ali sodnika ter med pridržanjem.
Provided that this complies with the right to a fair trial, Member States should be able to derogate from the obligation to provide assistance by a lawyer where this is not proportionate in the light of the circumstances of the case, it being understood that the child's best interests should always be a primary consideration.
Poleg tega bi se lahko odvzem prostosti otroku izrekel v kazenski sodbi zgolj, če je imel pomoč odvetnika, s katero je lahko uveljavljal svoje pravice obrambe učinkovito in v vsakem primeru med obravnavo pred sodiščem.
In any event, children should be assisted by a lawyer when they are brought before a competent court or judge in order to decide on detention at any stage of the proceedings within the scope of this Directive, as well as during detention.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da v zvezi z tem določijo posebno praktično ureditev.
Moreover, deprivation of liberty should not be imposed as a criminal sentence unless the child has been assisted by a lawyer in such a way as to allow the child to exercise his or her rights of the defence effectively and, in any event, during the trial hearings before a court.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba omogočiti, da zaradi nujnih razlogov začasno odstopajo od obveznosti zagotavljanja pomoči odvetnika v predkazenskem postopku, če je to nujno zaradi preprečevanja resnih škodljivih posledic za življenje, svobodo ali telesno celovitost osebe ali kadar je takojšnje ukrepanje preiskovalnih organov nujno, da se prepreči resno tveganje za kazenski postopek v zvezi s hudim kaznivim dejanjem, med drugim za pridobitev informacij v zvezi z domnevnimi sostorilci hudega kaznivega dejanja ali da se prepreči izguba pomembnih dokazov o hudem kaznivem dejanju.
Member States should be able to make practical arrangements in that respect.
V času začasnega odstopanja zaradi enega od teh nujnih razlogov bi pristojni organi morali imeti možnost otroka zaslišati brez navzočnosti odvetnika, če so ga obvestili o njegovi pravici do molka in jo otrok lahko uveljavlja ter če tako zaslišanje ne posega v pravice obrambe, vključno z njegovo pravico, da ne izpove zoper sebe.
Member States should be able to derogate temporarily from the obligation to provide assistance by a lawyer in the pre-trial phase for compelling reasons, namely where there is an urgent need to avert serious adverse consequences for the life, liberty or physical integrity of a person, or where immediate action by the investigating authorities is imperative to prevent substantial jeopardy to criminal proceedings in relation to a serious criminal offence, inter alia, with a view to obtaining information concerning the alleged co-perpetrators of a serious criminal offence, or in order to avoid the loss of important evidence regarding a serious criminal offence.
Moralo bi biti mogoče, da se, kolikor je potrebno, opravi zaslišanje, in sicer zgolj z namenom pridobitve informacij, nujnih za preprečitev resnih škodljivih posledic za življenje, svobodo ali telesno celovitost osebe, ali za preprečitev resnega tveganja za kazenski postopek.
During a temporary derogation for one of those compelling reasons, the competent authorities should be able to question children without the lawyer being present, provided that they have been informed of their right to remain silent and can exercise that right, and that such questioning does not prejudice the rights of the defence, including the right not to incriminate oneself.
Vsakršna zloraba tega začasnega odstopanja bi načeloma nepopravljivo posegla v pravice obrambe.
It should be possible to carry out questioning, to the extent necessary, for the sole purpose of obtaining information that is essential to avert serious adverse consequences for the life, liberty or physical integrity of a person, or to prevent substantial jeopardy to criminal proceedings.
Države članice bi morale v svojem nacionalnem pravu jasno določiti razloge in merila za takšno začasno odstopanje in ga uporabljati le v izjemnih primerih.
Any abuse of this temporary derogation would, in principle, irretrievably prejudice the rights of the defence.
Vsakršno začasno odstopanje bi moralo biti sorazmerno, strogo časovno omejeno, ne bi smelo temeljiti izključno na vrsti ali teži domnevnega kaznivega dejanja in ne bi smelo vplivati na splošno poštenost postopka.
Member States should clearly set out in their national law the grounds and criteria for such a temporary derogation, and they should make restricted use thereof.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da lahko v primeru, da je začasno odstopanje na podlagi te direktive odobril pristojni organ, ki ni sodnik ali sodišče, to odločitev o odobritvi začasnega odstopanja oceni sodišče vsaj v fazi obravnave pred sodiščem.
Any temporary derogation should be proportional, strictly limited in time, not based exclusively on the type or the seriousness of the alleged criminal offence, and should not prejudice the overall fairness of the proceedings.
Zaupnost komunikacije med otrokom in njegovim odvetnikom je ključna za zagotovitev učinkovitega uveljavljanja pravic obrambe in je bistven del pravice do poštenega sojenja.
Member States should ensure that where the temporary derogation has been authorised pursuant to this Directive by a competent authority which is not a judge or a court, the decision on authorising the temporary derogation can be assessed by a court, at least during the trial stage.
Države članice bi zato morale brez odstopanja spoštovati zaupnost srečanj in drugih oblik komunikacije med otrokom in njegovim odvetnikom v okviru uveljavljanja pravice do pomoči odvetnika iz te direktive.
Confidentiality of communication between children and their lawyer is key to ensuring the effective exercise of the rights of the defence and is an essential part of the right to a fair trial.
Ta direktiva ne posega v postopke, ki obravnavajo primere, v katerih je odvetnik na podlagi objektivnih in dejanskih okoliščin osumljen, da je skupaj z otrokom vpleten v kaznivo dejanje.
Member States should therefore respect the confidentiality of meetings and other forms of communication between the lawyer and the child in the context of the assistance by a lawyer provided for in this Directive, without derogation.
Kakršna koli kazniva dejavnost na strani odvetnika ne bi smela šteti za zakonito pomoč otroku v okviru te direktive.
This Directive is without prejudice to procedures that address the situation where there are objective and factual circumstances giving rise to the suspicion that the lawyer is involved with the child in a criminal offence.
Obveznost spoštovanja zaupnosti ne pomeni samo, da bi se države članice morale vzdržati posegov v to komunikacijo oziroma v dostop do nje, temveč tudi da zagotovijo, da ureditev, kar zadeva komunikacijo, zagotavlja in varuje takšno zaupnost, kadar je bila otrokom odvzeta prostost ali se kako drugače nahajajo na kraju, ki je pod nadzorom države.
Any criminal activity on the part of a lawyer should not be considered to be legitimate assistance to children within the framework of this Directive.
To ne posega v morebitne mehanizme, ki so v ustanovah za pridržanje vzpostavljeni za prestrezanje nedovoljenih pošiljk pridržanim osebam, kot je pregledovanje pošte, pod pogojem, da ti mehanizmi pristojnim organom ne dopuščajo branja sporočil med otrokom in njegovim odvetnikom.
The obligation to respect confidentiality not only implies that Member States refrain from interfering with, or accessing, such communication but also that, where children are deprived of liberty or otherwise find themselves in a place under the control of the State, Member States ensure that arrangements for communication uphold and protect such confidentiality.
Ta direktiva tudi ne posega v postopke iz nacionalnega prava, v skladu s katerimi se lahko posredovanje pošte zavrne, če pošiljatelj ne soglaša s tem, da se pošta najprej predloži pristojnemu sodišču.
This is without prejudice to any mechanisms that are in place in detention facilities with the purpose of avoiding illicit enclosures being sent to detainees, such as screening correspondence, provided that such mechanisms do not allow the competent authorities to read the communication between children and their lawyer.
Ta direktiva ne posega v kršitev zaupnosti, povezano z zakonito operacijo opazovanja in sledenja, ki jo izvajajo pristojni organi.
This Directive is also without prejudice to procedures under national law according to which forwarding correspondence may be rejected if the sender does not agree to the correspondence first being submitted to a competent court.
Ta direktiva tudi ne posega v dejavnosti, ki jih na primer izvajajo nacionalne obveščevalne službe, ki zagotavljajo nacionalno varnost v skladu s členom 4(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), ali ki spadajo na področje uporabe člena 72 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), na podlagi katerega naslov V dela III PDEU, o območju svobode, varnosti in pravice, ne vpliva na izpolnjevanje obveznosti, ki jih imajo države članice glede vzdrževanja javnega reda in miru ter zagotavljanja notranje varnosti.
This Directive is without prejudice to a breach of confidentiality that is incidental to a lawful surveillance operation by competent authorities.
Otroci, ki so osumljene ali obdolžene osebe v kazenskem postopku, bi morali imeti pravico do individualne ocene, v okviru katere se opredelijo njihove posebne potrebe glede varstva, izobraževanja, usposabljanja in socialnega vključevanja, da se določi, ali in v kolikšni meri bi bili zanje potrebni posebni ukrepi v času kazenskega postopka, obseg njihove kazenske odgovornosti in ustreznost določene kazni ali vzgojnega ukrepa.
This Directive is also without prejudice to the work that is carried out, for example, by national intelligence services to safeguard national security in accordance with Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), or that falls within the scope of Article 72 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) pursuant to which Title V of Part III of the TFEU, on the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, must not affect the exercise of the responsibilities incumbent upon Member States with regard to the maintenance of law and order and the safeguarding of internal security.
Pri individualni oceni bi bilo zlasti treba upoštevati osebnost in zrelost otroka, njegovo ekonomsko, socialno in družinsko ozadje, vključno z njegovim življenjskim okoljem, ter morebitno posebno ranljivost otroka, kot so učne težave in težave pri sporazumevanju.
Children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings should have the right to an individual assessment to identify their specific needs in terms of protection, education, training and social integration, to determine if and to what extent they would need special measures during the criminal proceedings, the extent of their criminal responsibility and the appropriateness of a particular penalty or educative measure.
Moralo bi biti mogoče, da se obseg in podrobnosti individualne ocene lahko prilagodijo glede na okoliščine zadeve, ob upoštevanju teže domnevnega kaznivega dejanja in ukrepov, ki se lahko izrečejo, če je otrok spoznan za krivega storitve takšnega kaznivega dejanja.
The individual assessment should, in particular, take into account the child's personality and maturity, the child's economic, social and family background, including living environment, and any specific vulnerabilities of the child, such as learning disabilities and communication difficulties.
Nedavno opravljena individualna ocena otroka bi se lahko ponovno uporabila, če se posodobi.
It should be possible to adapt the extent and detail of an individual assessment according to the circumstances of the case, taking into account the seriousness of the alleged criminal offence and the measures that could be taken if the child is found guilty of such an offence.
Pristojni organi bi morali upoštevati informacije, ki izhajajo iz individualne ocene, pri odločanju, ali je treba v zvezi z otrokom sprejeti morebitne posebne ukrepe, kot je zagotovitev praktične pomoči; pri ocenjevanju primernosti in učinkovitosti morebitnih previdnostnih ukrepov v zvezi z otrokom, kot so odločitve o začasnem pridržanju ali alternativnih ukrepih; ter, ob upoštevanju individualnih lastnosti in okoliščin otroka, pri odločanju oziroma ukrepanju v okviru kazenskega postopka, vključno z izrekanjem sankcije.
An individual assessment which has been carried out with regard to the same child in the recent past could be used if it is updated.
Če individualna ocena še ni na voljo, to pristojnim organom ne bi smelo preprečiti sprejetja takih ukrepov ali odločitev, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjeni pogoji iz te direktive, vključno z izvedbo individualne ocene v najzgodnejši ustrezni fazi postopka.