natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The introduction of rules on the insolvency proceedings of groups of companies should not limit the possibility for a court to open insolvency proceedings for several companies belonging to the same group in a single jurisdiction if the court finds that the centre of main interests of those companies is located in a single Member State.
Uvedba pravil o postopkih v primeru insolventnosti skupine družb ne bi smela omejevati možnosti sodišča, da uvede postopek v primeru insolventnosti za več družb iz iste skupine na enem samem območju pristojnosti, če sodišče ugotovi, da se središče glavnih interesov teh družb nahaja v eni sami državi članici.
In such cases, the court should also be able to appoint, if appropriate, the same insolvency practitioner in all proceedings concerned, provided that this is not incompatible with the rules applicable to them.
V takšnih primerih bi moralo sodišče imeti tudi možnost imenovati, če je primerno, istega stečajnega upravitelja v vseh zadevnih postopkih, pod pogojem, da to ni nezdružljivo s pravili, ki se zanje uporabljajo.
With a view to further improving the coordination of the insolvency proceedings of members of a group of companies, and to allow for a coordinated restructuring of the group, this Regulation should introduce procedural rules on the coordination of the insolvency proceedings of members of a group of companies.
Ta uredba bi morala zaradi nadaljnjega izboljšanja usklajevanja postopkov v primeru insolventnosti članov skupine družb in zato, da se omogoči usklajeno prestrukturiranje skupine, uvesti postopkovna pravila o usklajevanju postopkov v primeru insolventnosti članov skupine družb.
Such coordination should strive to ensure the efficiency of the coordination, whilst at the same time respecting each group member's separate legal personality.
Namen takšnega usklajevanja bi moralo biti zagotavljanje učinkovitosti usklajevanja in hkratno upoštevanje ločenosti pravne osebnosti posameznih članov skupine.
An insolvency practitioner appointed in insolvency proceedings opened in relation to a member of a group of companies should be able to request the opening of group coordination proceedings.
Stečajni upravitelj, imenovan v postopku v primeru insolventnosti, uvedenem v zvezi s članom skupine družb, bi moral imeti možnost zahtevati uvedbo postopka za usklajevanje skupine.
However, where the law applicable to the insolvency so requires, that insolvency practitioner should obtain the necessary authorisation before making such a request.
Vendar pa bi moral ta stečajni upravitelj pred vložitvijo takšne zahteve pridobiti potrebno dovoljenje, kadar to zahteva pravo, ki se uporablja v primeru insolventnosti.
The request should specify the essential elements of the coordination, in particular an outline of the coordination plan, a proposal as to whom should be appointed as coordinator and an outline of the estimated costs of the coordination.
V zahtevi bi morali biti navedeni bistveni elementi usklajevanja, zlasti povzetek načrta usklajevanja, predlog, kdo naj bi bil imenovan za usklajevalca, in povzetek predvidenih stroškov usklajevanja.
In order to ensure the voluntary nature of group coordination proceedings, the insolvency practitioners involved should be able to object to their participation in the proceedings within a specified time period.
Za zagotovitev prostovoljne narave postopkov za usklajevanje skupine bi morali zadevni stečajni upravitelji imeti možnost, da v določenem roku izrazijo nestrinjanje s svojo udeležbo v postopkih.
In order to allow the insolvency practitioners involved to take an informed decision on participation in the group coordination proceedings, they should be informed at an early stage of the essential elements of the coordination.
Da bi zadevnim stečajnim upraviteljem omogočili, da se na podlagi ustreznih informacij odločijo o udeležbi v postopku za usklajevanje skupine, bi morali biti v zgodnji fazi obveščeni o bistvenih elementih usklajevanja.
However, any insolvency practitioner who initially objects to inclusion in the group coordination proceedings should be able to subsequently request to participate in them.
Kljub temu bi moral vsak stečajni upravitelj, ki najprej nasprotuje vključitvi v postopek za usklajevanje skupine, imeti možnost, da pozneje zahteva sodelovanje v njem.
In such a case, the coordinator should take a decision on the admissibility of the request.
V takšnem primeru bi moral usklajevalec sprejeti odločitev o tem, ali je ta zahteva sprejemljiva.
All insolvency practitioners, including the requesting insolvency practitioner, should be informed of the coordinator's decision and should have the opportunity of challenging that decision before the court which has opened the group coordination proceedings.
Vsi stečajni upravitelji, vključno s stečajnim upraviteljem, ki je vložil zahtevo, bi morali biti obveščeni o odločitvi usklajevalca in bi morali imeti priložnost izpodbijati to odločitev na sodišču, ki je uvedlo postopek za usklajevanje skupine.
Group coordination proceedings should always strive to facilitate the effective administration of the insolvency proceedings of the group members, and to have a generally positive impact for the creditors.
Namen postopka za usklajevanje skupine bi vedno moral biti pospeševanje učinkovitega upravljanja postopa v primeru insolventnosti za člane skupine in na splošno pozitiven vpliv na upnike.
This Regulation should therefore ensure that the court with which a request for group coordination proceedings has been filed makes an assessment of those criteria prior to opening group coordination proceedings.
Zato bi se moralo s to uredbo zagotoviti, da sodišče, pri katerem je bil vložen zahtevek za postopek za usklajevanje skupine, oceni ta merila še pred uvedbo postopka za usklajevanje skupine.
The advantages of group coordination proceedings should not be outweighed by the costs of those proceedings.
Prednosti postopkov za usklajevanje skupine ne bi smele presegati stroškov teh postopkov.
Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that the costs of the coordination, and the share of those costs that each group member will bear, are adequate, proportionate and reasonable, and are determined in accordance with the national law of the Member State in which group coordination proceedings have been opened.
Zato je treba zagotoviti, da so stroški usklajevanja in delež teh stroškov, ki ga bo nosil vsak član skupine, ustrezni, sorazmerni in razumni ter da se jih določi v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice, v kateri je bil uveden postopek za usklajevanje skupine.
The insolvency practitioners involved should also have the possibility of controlling those costs from an early stage of the proceedings.
Udeleženi stečajni upravitelji bi prav tako morali imeti možnost nadzirati te stroške že od zgodnje faze naprej.
Where the national law so requires, controlling costs from an early stage of proceedings could involve the insolvency practitioner seeking the approval of a court or creditors' committee.
Kadar tako zahteva nacionalno pravo, lahko nadziranje stroškov od zgodnje faze postopka naprej vključuje, da stečajni upravitelj zaprositi za odobritev sodišča ali odbora upnikov.
Where the coordinator considers that the fulfilment of his or her tasks requires a significant increase in costs compared to the initially estimated costs and, in any case, where the costs exceed 10 % of the estimated costs, the coordinator should be authorised by the court which has opened the group coordination proceedings to exceed such costs.
Kadar usklajevalec meni, da bi izpolnjevanje njegovih nalog bistveno povečalo stroške v primerjavi s prvotno ocenjenimi stroški, v vsakem primeru pa, kadar stroški presegajo 10 % predvidenih stroškov, bi moralo sodišče, ki je uvedlo postopek za usklajevanje skupine, usklajevalcu odobriti, da takšne stroške preseže.
Before taking its decision, the court which has opened the group coordination proceedings should give the possibility to the participating insolvency practitioners to be heard before it in order to allow them to communicate their observations on the appropriateness of the coordinator's request.
Pred sprejetjem takšne odločitve bi moralo sodišče, ki je uvedlo postopek za usklajevanje skupine, udeleženim stečajnim upraviteljem omogočiti zaslišanje, da bi lahko sporočili svoje pripombe v zvezi s primernostjo usklajevalčeve zahteve.
For members of a group of companies which are not participating in group coordination proceedings, this Regulation should also provide for an alternative mechanism to achieve a coordinated restructuring of the group.
V tej uredbi bi bilo poleg tega treba predvideti alternativni mehanizem za usklajeno prestrukturiranje skupine za tiste člane skupine družb, ki ne sodelujejo v postopku za usklajevanje skupine.
An insolvency practitioner appointed in proceedings relating to a member of a group of companies should have standing to request a stay of any measure related to the realisation of the assets in the proceedings opened with respect to other members of the group which are not subject to group coordination proceedings.
Stečajni upravitelj, imenovan v postopku v zvezi s članom skupine družb, bi moral imeti procesno sposobnost zahtevati prekinitev vseh ukrepov, povezanih z unovčenjem premoženja v postopku, uvedenem proti drugim članom skupine, za katere ne velja postopek usklajevanja skupine.
It should only be possible to request such a stay if a restructuring plan is presented for the members of the group concerned, if the plan is to the benefit of the creditors in the proceedings in respect of which the stay is requested, and if the stay is necessary to ensure that the plan can be properly implemented.
Takšno prekinitev bi moralo biti mogoče zahtevati le, če je načrt prestrukturiranja predstavljen članom zadevne skupine, če je ta načrt v korist upnikov v postopku, za katerega se zahteva prekinitev, ter če je prekinitev potrebna, da se zagotovi pravilno izvajanje načrta.
This Regulation should not prevent Member States from establishing national rules which would supplement the rules on cooperation, communication and coordination with regard to the insolvency of members of groups of companies set out in this Regulation, provided that the scope of application of those national rules is limited to the national jurisdiction and that their application would not impair the efficiency of the rules laid down by this Regulation.
Ta uredba državam članicam ne bi smela preprečevati, da določijo nacionalna pravila, ki bi dopolnila pravila o sodelovanju, obveščanju in usklajevanju v zvezi z insolventnostjo članov skupin družb iz te uredbe, pod pogojem, da je področje uporabe navedenih nacionalnih pravil omejeno na nacionalno pristojnost in da njihova uporaba ne bi škodovala učinkovitosti pravil, določenih s to uredbo.
The rules on cooperation, communication and coordination in the framework of the insolvency of members of a group of companies provided for in this Regulation should only apply to the extent that proceedings relating to different members of the same group of companies have been opened in more than one Member State.
Pravila o sodelovanju, obveščanju in usklajevanju v okviru insolventnosti članov skupine družb, določena v tej uredbi, bi se morala uporabljati le, kadar so postopki v zvezi z različnimi člani iste skupine družb uvedeni v več kot eni državi članici.
Any creditor which has its habitual residence, domicile or registered office in the Union should have the right to lodge its claims in each of the insolvency proceedings pending in the Union relating to the debtor's assets.
Vsak upnik, ki ima običajno ali stalno prebivališče ali registrirani sedež v Uniji, bi morali imeti pravico do prijave terjatev v vsakem postopku v primeru insolventnosti, ki teče znotraj Unije in se nanaša na premoženje dolžnika.
This should also apply to tax authorities and social insurance institutions.
To bi moralo veljati tudi za davčne organe in ustanove socialnega zavarovanja.
This Regulation should not prevent the insolvency practitioner from lodging claims on behalf of certain groups of creditors, for example employees, where the national law so provides.
Ta uredba ne bi smela stečajnemu upravitelju preprečevati prijave terjatve v imenu določene skupine upnikov, na primer zaposlenih, če tako določa nacionalno pravo.
However, in order to ensure the equal treatment of creditors, the distribution of proceeds should be coordinated.
Vendar bi za zagotovitev enake obravnave upnikov razdelitev iztržkov od unovčenja premoženja morala biti koordinirana.
Every creditor should be able to keep what it has received in the course of insolvency proceedings, but should be entitled only to participate in the distribution of total assets in other proceedings if creditors with the same standing have obtained the same proportion of their claims.
Vsakemu upniku bi moralo biti omogočeno, da obdrži tisto, kar je prejel v okviru postopka v primeru insolventnosti, vendar bi moral imeti pravico sodelovati v razdelitvi skupnega premoženja v drugem postopku le, če so upniki z enakim položajem pridobili enak delež svojih terjatev.
It is essential that creditors which have their habitual residence, domicile or registered office in the Union be informed about the opening of insolvency proceedings relating to their debtor's assets.
Bistvenega pomena je, da so upniki, ki imajo običajno ali stalno prebivališče ali registrirani sedež v Uniji, obveščeni o uvedbi postopka v primeru insolventnosti v zvezi s premoženjem dolžnika.
In order to ensure a swift transmission of information to creditors, Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] should not apply where this Regulation refers to the obligation to inform creditors.
Da bi zagotovili hiter prenos informacij upnikom, se Uredba (ES) št. 1393/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6] ne bi smela uporabljati v primerih, ko se ta uredba nanaša na obveznost obveščanja upnikov.
The use of standard forms available in all official languages of the institutions of the Union should facilitate the task of creditors when lodging claims in proceedings opened in another Member State.
Uporaba standardnih obrazcev, ki so na voljo v vseh uradnih jezikih institucij Unije, bi morala upnikom olajšati prijavo terjatev v postopkih, uvedenih v drugi državi članici.
The consequences of the incomplete filing of the standard forms should be a matter for national law.
Posledice nepopolne vložitve standardnih obrazcev bi morale biti zadeva nacionalnega prava.
This Regulation should provide for the immediate recognition of judgments concerning the opening, conduct and closure of insolvency proceedings which fall within its scope, and of judgments handed down in direct connection with such insolvency proceedings.
Ta uredba bi morala zagotoviti takojšnje priznanje odločb o uvedbi, vodenju in končanju postopkov v primeru insolventnosti, ki spadajo v njeno področje uporabe, ter odločb, sprejetih v neposredni povezavi s takšnimi postopki v primeru insolventnosti.
Automatic recognition should therefore mean that the effects attributed to the proceedings by the law of the Member State in which the proceedings were opened extend to all other Member States.
Avtomatično priznanje bi zato moralo pomeniti, da se učinki, ki se pripisujejo postopkom po pravu države članice, v kateri so bili uvedeni postopki v primeru insolventnosti, razširijo na vse druge države članice.
The recognition of judgments delivered by the courts of the Member States should be based on the principle of mutual trust.
Priznavanje odločb sodišča držav članic bi moralo temeljiti na načelu medsebojnega zaupanja.
To that end, grounds for non-recognition should be reduced to the minimum necessary.
Zato bi bilo treba vzroke za nepriznavanje zmanjšati na najmanjšo potrebno mero.
This is also the basis on which any dispute should be resolved where the courts of two Member States both claim competence to open the main insolvency proceedings.
Na tej podlagi bi bilo treba reševati tudi spore, kadar bi se sodišči dveh držav članic izrekli za pristojna za uvedbo glavnega postopka v primeru insolventnosti.
The decision of the first court to open proceedings should be recognised in the other Member States without those Member States having the power to scrutinise that court's decision.
Odločbo sodišča, ki prvo uvede postopek, bi morale priznati druge države članice, pri čemer te ne bi bile pooblaščene za pregledovanje te sodne odločbe.
This Regulation should set out, for the matters covered by it, uniform rules on conflict of laws which replace, within their scope of application, national rules of private international law.
Ta uredba bi morala za zadeve, ki jih zajema, določiti enotne kolizijske norme, ki v okviru zadevnega področja uporabe nadomeščajo nacionalna pravila mednarodnega zasebnega prava.
Unless otherwise stated, the law of the Member State of the opening of proceedings should be applicable (lex concursus).
Če ni določeno drugače, bi se moralo uporabiti pravo države članice, v kateri je bil uveden postopek v primeru insolventnosti (lex concursus).
This rule on conflict of laws should be valid both for the main insolvency proceedings and for local proceedings.
Ta kolizijska norma bi morala veljati tako za glavni postopek v primeru insolventnosti kot tudi za domače postopke.
The lex concursus determines all the effects of the insolvency proceedings, both procedural and substantive, on the persons and legal relations concerned.
Lex concursus določa vse procesne in materialne učinke postopka v primeru insolventnosti, za zadevne osebe in zadevna pravna razmerja.
It governs all the conditions for the opening, conduct and closure of the insolvency proceedings.
Ureja vse pogoje za uvedbo, vodenje in končanje postopka v primeru insolventnosti.
Automatic recognition of insolvency proceedings to which the law of the State of the opening of proceedings normally applies may interfere with the rules under which transactions are carried out in other Member States.
Avtomatično priznanje postopka v primeru insolventnosti, za katerega se praviloma uporablja pravo države, v kateri je bil postopek uveden, lahko kolidira s pravili drugih držav članic o izvajanju pravnih dejanj.
To protect legitimate expectations and the certainty of transactions in Member States other than that in which proceedings are opened, provision should be made for a number of exceptions to the general rule.
Za zagotovitev zaščite zakonitih pričakovanj in pravne varnosti v državah članicah, ki niso tiste, v kateri je bil uveden postopek v primeru insolventnosti, bi bilo treba predvideti številne izjeme od splošnega pravila.
There is a particular need for a special reference diverging from the law of the opening State in the case of rights in rem, since such rights are of considerable importance for the granting of credit.
Obstaja zlasti potreba po posebni navedbi odstopanja od prava države, v kateri je bil uveden postopek v primeru insolventnosti, v primeru stvarnih pravic, saj so te pravice precejšnjega pomena pri odobritvi kreditov.
The basis, validity and extent of rights in rem should therefore normally be determined according to the lex situs and not be affected by the opening of insolvency proceedings.
Podlago, veljavnost in učinkovanje stvarnih pravic bi bilo zato treba praviloma določiti po pravu kraja (lex situs) in nanje ne bi smela vplivati uvedba postopka v primeru insolventnosti.
The proprietor of a right in rem should therefore be able to continue to assert its right to segregation or separate settlement of the collateral security.
Imetniku stvarnih pravic bi zato moralo biti še naprej omogočeno dodatno jamstvo pri uveljavljanju izločitvenih in ločitvenih pravic.
Where assets are subject to rights in rem under the lex situs in one Member State but the main insolvency proceedings are being carried out in another Member State, the insolvency practitioner in the main insolvency proceedings should be able to request the opening of secondary insolvency proceedings in the jurisdiction where the rights in rem arise if the debtor has an establishment there.
Kadar za premoženje v eni državi članici veljajo stvarne pravice po pravu kraja, v katerem se nahaja premoženje dolžnika, glavni postopek v primeru insolventnosti pa teče v drugi državi članici, bi moral imeti stečajni upravitelj v glavnem postopku v primeru insolventnosti možnost zahtevati uvedbo sekundarnega postopka v primeru insolventnosti na območju pristojnosti nastanka stvarnih pravic, če ima dolžnik tam poslovalnico.
If secondary insolvency proceedings are not opened, any surplus on the sale of an asset covered by rights in rem should be paid to the insolvency practitioner in the main insolvency proceedings.
Če sekundarni postopek v primeru insolventnosti ni uveden, bi se moral presežek od prodaje premoženja, za katero veljajo stvarne pravice, izplačati stečajnemu upravitelju v glavnem postopku v primeru insolventnosti.
This Regulation lays down several provisions for a court to order a stay of opening proceedings or a stay of enforcement proceedings.
Ta uredba določa več določb v zvezi z možnostjo, da sodišče prekine uvedbo postopka ali prekine postopek izvršbe.
Any such stay should not affect the rights in rem of creditors or third parties.
Takšna morebitna prekinitev ne bi smela vplivati na stvarne pravice upnikov ali tretjih oseb.
If a set-off of claims is not permitted under the law of the State of the opening of proceedings, a creditor should nevertheless be entitled to the set-off if it is possible under the law applicable to the claim of the insolvent debtor.
Če pravo države, v kateri je bil uveden postopek, ne dovoljuje pobota terjatev, bi moral biti upnik kljub temu upravičen do pobota, če je ta mogoč po pravu, ki se uporablja za terjatev insolventnega dolžnika.
In this way, set-off would acquire a kind of guarantee function based on legal provisions on which the creditor concerned can rely at the time when the claim arises.
S tem bi pobot dobil neke vrste garancijsko funkcijo, ki temelji na predpisih in na katero se zadevni upnik lahko zanese v času nastanka terjatve.
There is also a need for special protection in the case of payment systems and financial markets, for example in relation to the position-closing agreements and netting agreements to be found in such systems, as well as the sale of securities and the guarantees provided for such transactions as governed in particular by Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].
Potreba po posebni zaščiti obstaja tudi v primeru plačilnih sistemov in finančnih trgov, na primer v zvezi z dogovori o izravnavi in o poravnavanju neto saldov v okviru teh sistemov, kot tudi za prodajo vrednostnih papirjev in za garancije, odobrene za take posle, kar posebej ureja Direktiva 98/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7].
For such transactions, the only law which is relevant should be that applicable to the system or market concerned.
Edino relevantno pravo za take posle bi moralo biti tisto, ki se uporablja za zadevni sistem ali trg.
That law is intended to prevent the possibility of mechanisms for the payment and settlement of transactions, and provided for in payment and set-off systems or on the regulated financial markets of the Member States, being altered in the case of insolvency of a business partner.
Namen tega prava je, da se v primeru insolventnosti poslovnega partnerja v okviru sistemov plačil in poravnav ali na urejenih finančnih trgih držav članic prepreči možnost spreminjanja mehanizmov plačil in poravnave poslov.
Directive 98/26/EC contains special provisions which should take precedence over the general rules laid down in this Regulation.
Direktiva 98/26/ES vsebuje posebne določbe, ki bi morale imeti prednost pred splošnimi pravili, določenimi v tej uredbi.