natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Thus, the policy pursued by the PRC through, for example establishing unfavourable VAT conditions on exports of a given raw material [14] results first in suppressed (net) export prices of such raw material from the PRC (as exporters from the PRC have to compete in the international markets with companies that generally do not pay VAT on export sales), and second, in an incentive to shift sales towards the domestic market, thus suppressing domestic prices below international prices.
Zato sta posledici politike LRK, ki na primer vzpostavlja neugodne razmere DDV za izvoz določene surovine [14], prvič, nižje (neto) izvozne cene zadevne surovine iz LRK (ker morajo izvozniki iz LRK na mednarodnih trgih tekmovati z družbami, ki običajno ne plačujejo DDV na izvoz), in drugič, spodbujanje premika prodaje na domači trg in s tem znižanje domačih cen pod mednarodne.
Furthermore, the investigation established that maleic anhydride is made of benzene or butane accounting for 90 % of the total cost of manufacturing.
Nadalje je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da je anhidrid maleinske kisline narejen iz benzena ali butana, kar predstavlja 90 % skupnih proizvodnih stroškov.
In addition, it was found that the price quotations for maleic anhydride in the PRC are at the same level regardless of whether it is made from benzene or butane.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da so navedene cene za anhidrid maleinske kisline v LRK na isti ravni ne glede na to, ali se proizvaja iz benzena ali butana.
Exports of benzene from the PRC are subject to 40 % export tax and the VAT paid is not refundable when exported.
Izvoz benzena iz LRK je predmet izvoznega davka v višini 40 %, plačani DDV pa se ob izvozu ne povrne.
Therefore, it can be reasonably concluded that the benzene market in the PRC has an indirect impact on the market for maleic anhydride produced from butane, as the one used by Bioking, and further contributes to the overall distortion of the maleic anhydride market in the PRC.
Zato je mogoče razumno sklepati, da ima trg benzena v LRK posreden učinek na trg anhidrida maleinske kisline, proizvedenega iz butana, kot je tisti, ki ga uporablja Bioking, in dodatno prispeva k skupnemu izkrivljanju trga anhidrida maleinske kisline v LRK.
Finally, the investigation showed that a number of maleic anhydride producers in the PRC were State owned and that there was significant overcapacity on the Chinese market.
Končno se je v preiskavi izkazalo tudi, da so številni proizvajalci anhidrida maleinske kisline v LRK v državni lasti in da je za kitajski trg značilna presežna zmogljivost.
It can be reasonably concluded that the persistence of the overcapacity is linked to the protected status of the State owned companies preventing the normal market mechanism such as consolidation and closures to address these overcapacities.
Razumno je mogoče sklepati, da je stalen obstoj presežne zmogljivosti povezan z zaščitenim statusom družb v državni lasti, ki običajnim tržnim mehanizmom, kot sta konsolidacija in zaprtje, preprečuje obravnavo te presežne zmogljivosti.
Considering the above, the Chinese domestic market of maleic anhydride is considered to be distorted as a whole.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se šteje, da je kitajski domači trg anhidrida maleinske kisline kot celota izkrivljen.
Following disclosure, the exporting producer claimed that the price comparison for maleic anhydride referred to in recitals from 41 to 44 was based on domestic prices and therefore not appropriate.
Po razkritju je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je primerjava cen za anhidrid maleinske kisline iz uvodnih izjav 41–44 temeljila na domačih cenah in zato ni primerna.
Instead, the exporting producer suggested that export prices from the third markets should have been compared to the Chinese domestic prices.
Namesto tega je proizvajalec izvoznik predlagal, da bi bilo treba izvozne cene s tretjih trgov primerjati s kitajskimi domačimi cenami.
The exporting producer provided alternative price comparisons between the international export prices and Chinese domestic prices.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je predložil alternativne primerjave cen med mednarodnimi izvoznimi cenami in kitajskimi domačimi cenami.
The exporting producer also suggested that a price comparison between its purchase prices and the US export prices on the basis of the US customs statistics database would show that its purchase price was systematically higher than the US export prices to various third country markets.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil tudi, da bi primerjava med njegovimi nakupnimi cenami in izvoznimi cenami ZDA na podlagi podatkovne zbirke statističnih podatkov o carini ZDA pokazala, da je bila njegova nakupna cena sistematično višja od izvoznih cen ZDA na trge različnih tretjih držav.
The exporting producer further claimed that the raw material cost for maleic anhydride (price of butane) in Taiwan was higher than in the PRC or the USA and that for these reasons the comparison to Taiwanese prices was inappropriate.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je nadalje trdil, da je cena surovin za anhidrid maleinske kisline (cena butana) v Tajvanu višja od cene v LRK ali ZDA in da iz teh razlogov primerjava s tajvanskimi cenami ni primerna.
The alternative international export price comparisons provided by the exporting producer were not appropriate.
Alternativne primerjave mednarodnih izvoznih cen, ki jih je predložil proizvajalec izvoznik, niso bile primerne.
As explained in recital 42, comparable domestic prices with similar delivery terms were considered an appropriate basis for comparison.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 42, so se primerljive domače cene s podobnimi dobavnimi pogoji štele kot primerna osnova za primerjavo.
It is also noted that Bioking did not put forward any reasons to justify its claim that the use of domestic prices for the comparison per se would not be appropriate.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da Bioking ni predložil nobenega razloga za utemeljitev svoje trditve, da uporaba domačih cen za primerjavo sama po sebi ne bi bila primerna.
Also, as explained in recital 42, the investigation concluded that due to the transportation costs, the geographically closest market was likely to be the most reasonable basis for comparison.
Poleg tega je bilo, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 42, v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da je zaradi stroškov prevoza verjetno, da bo najbližji trg najrazumnejša podlaga za primerjavo.
Therefore, the claims that Taiwan did not constitute an appropriate basis of comparison, or that another basis for comparison, either export price data submitted by Bioking or from the US customs statistics, would be more appropriate, were rejected.
Zato so bile trditve, da Tajvan ne predstavlja primerne podlage za primerjavo oz. da bi bila primernejša druga podlaga za primerjavo (bodisi podatki o izvoznih cenah, ki jih je predložil Bioking, ali podatki iz podatkovne zbirke statističnih podatkov o carini ZDA), zavrnjene.
The exporting producer further claimed that any potential impact on the (net) export price and consequently on the Chinese domestic price of maleic anhydride as a consequence of the VAT regime referred to in recital 44 was overstated and it would only be minimal.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je nadalje trdil, da je bil kakršen koli morebitni vpliv režima DDV iz uvodne izjave 44 na (neto) izvozne cene in posledično kitajsko domačo ceno anhidrida maleinske kisline precenjen in da je le zelo majhen.
The claim was however not substantiated by factual evidence.
Vendar ta trditev ni bila podprta z dejanskimi dokazi.
In any event, on the basis of the information available during the investigation and as also shown by the price differences explained in recitals 41 to 44, the difference would be significant and higher than claimed by the exporting producer.
V vsakem primeru bi bila razlika bistvena in večja, kot trdi proizvajalec izvoznik, kot je razvidno na podlagi informacij, na voljo med preiskavo, in iz razlik med cenami, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 41–44.
The exporting producer further claimed that potential distortions through State interference in the benzene prices would be irrelevant since butane was becoming the leading market price setter and would replace progressively the benzene derived maleic anhydride on the market.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je nadalje trdil, da naj bi bila morebitna izkrivljanja zaradi vmešavanja države v cene benzena nerelevantna, saj cene na trgu vedno bolj določa butan, ki bo na trgu sčasoma nadomestil anhidrid maleinske kisline, pridobljen iz benzena.
As explained above in recital 45 export prices of maleic anhydride from the PRC are at the same level regardless of whether it is made from benzene or butane.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 45, so izvozne cene za anhidrid maleinske kisline v LRK na isti ravni ne glede na to, ali je proizveden iz benzena ali butana.
This indicates that the benzene market in the PRC has an indirect impact on maleic anhydride produced from butane, as the one used by Bioking, and further contributes to the overall maleic anhydride market distortion.
To kaže, da ima trg benzena v LRK posreden učinek na trg anhidrida maleinske kisline, proizvedenega iz butana, kot je tisti, ki ga uporablja Bioking, in dodatno prispeva k skupnemu izkrivljanju trga anhidrida maleinske kisline.
In any event, the finding that the Bioking' costs for major inputs do substantially not reflect market values was established on the basis of the data provided by the exporting producer.
V vsakem primeru je bilo na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je predložil proizvajalec izvoznik, ugotovljeno, da stroški družbe Bioking za glavne vstopne surovine bistveno ne odražajo tržnih vrednosti.
Last, the exporting producer did not support its claim with evidence on the alleged systematic material differences in this respect.
Proizvajalec izvoznik nenazadnje svoje trditve ni podprl z dokazi o domnevnih sistematičnih znatnih razlikah v zvezi s tem.
The exporting producer also claimed that the protected status of State owned enterprises producing maleic anhydride as confirmed by the Commission's MET investigation and explained in the MET disclosure to the exporting producer would have had no relevance since the exporting producer was buying maleic anhydride mostly from privately owned suppliers.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil tudi, da zaščiteni status državnih podjetij, ki proizvajajo anhidrid maleinske kisline, kot je Komisija potrdila v preiskavi v zvezi s TGO in proizvajalcu izvozniku pojasnila v razkritju za TGO, naj ne bi bil relevanten, saj je proizvajalec izvoznik anhidrid maleinske kisline kupoval predvsem pri dobaviteljih v zasebni lasti.
Regarding this claim, it was considered that even if the suppliers were mainly privately owned they could still be subject to the price pressure exerted by the large overcapacity and the protected status of State owned enterprises producing maleic anhydride.
V zvezi s to trditvijo se je štelo, da bi bili lahko zadevni dobavitelji, četudi so večinsko v zasebni lasti, še vedno podvrženi cenovnemu pritisku zaradi velikih presežnih zmogljivosti in zaščitenega statusa podjetij v državni lasti, ki proizvajajo anhidrid maleinske kisline.
Moreover, Bioking did not demonstrate the opposite.
Poleg tega Bioking ni dokazal nasprotnega.
In any event, the comparison of Bioking's purchase prices with international prices demonstrated that Bioking's prices were indeed distorted and that this corresponded to the overall distortion on the Chinese market.
V vsakem primeru je primerjava nakupnih cen družbe Bioking z mednarodnimi cenami pokazala, da so bile cene družbe Bioking dejansko izkrivljene in da je ta izkrivljenost ustrezala splošni izkrivljenosti na kitajskem trgu.
The exporting producer claimed that the determination of non-compliance with criterion 1 due to the Chinese VAT refund regime would be inconsistent with the GATT/WTO rules as different VAT refund systems were allowed under these rules and were not considered to distort market prices.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da naj bi bila ugotovitev neizpolnjevanja merila 1 zaradi kitajskega režima povračila DDV neskladna s pravili GATT/STO, saj ta pravila dovoljujejo različne sisteme povračila DDV in se zanje ne šteje, da izkrivljajo tržne cene.
This would be confirmed by the fact that the PRC did not undertake any special commitment on the VAT refund system under its WTO Accession Protocol.
To naj bi potrjevalo tudi dejstvo, da LRK v okviru svojega protokola o pristopu k STO ni sprejela posebnih zavez glede sistema povračila DDV.
Finally, the exporting producer claimed that MET was not rejected as a result of the Chinese VAT refund system in any earlier investigations and therefore it could not constitute a reason for rejecting MET in this investigation either.
Na koncu je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil tudi, da TGO zaradi kitajskega sistema povračila DDV ni bila zavrnjena v nobeni prejšnji preiskavi in da zato to ne more biti razlog za zavrnitev TGO v tej preiskavi.
Regardless of the fact that different VAT refund systems are allowed under GATT/WTO rules, in this case it was found that the Chinese VAT regime indeed suppressed Chinese (net) export prices and discouraged exports of maleic anhydride from the PRC.
Ne glede na to, da pravila GATT/STO dovoljujejo različne sisteme povračila DDV, je bilo v tem primeru ugotovljeno, da je kitajski režim DDV dejansko nižal kitajske (neto) izvozne cene in odvračal od izvoza anhidrida maleinske kisline iz LRK.
As a consequence, and as described in the recital 43 above, it was established that also Chinese domestic prices were suppressed which created a distortion in the market.
Kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 43, je bilo posledično ugotovljeno, da so bile kitajske domače cene znižane, kar je povzročilo izkrivljanje trga.
Therefore, these claims were rejected.
Zato so bile te trditve zavrnjene.
As regards the claim that MET has not been rejected as a result of the Chinese VAT refund system in any earlier investigations, it is recalled that in an earlier investigation [15] the absence of VAT refund was an argument supporting a negative MET assessment.
V zvezi s trditvami, da TGO v nobeni prejšnji preiskavi ni bila zavrnjena zaradi kitajskega sistema povračila DDV, je treba opozoriti, da je bila v eni prejšnji preiskavi [15] odsotnost povračila DDV argument v podporo negativni oceni za TGO.
The current investigation established that the prices of the maleic anhydride paid by Bioking as well as overall prices in the PRC did not reflect market values as they were systematically lower than international prices.
V sedanji preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da cene za anhidrid maleinske kisline, ki jih je plačeval Bioking, in splošne cene v LRK niso odražale tržnih vrednosti, saj so bile sistematično nižje od mednarodnih cen.
The Chinese VAT refund system was analysed as an explanation of the distortion.
Kitajski sistem povračila DDV je bil analiziran kot razlaga za izkrivljanje.
For each investigation the MET decision is made independently, on the basis of the specific circumstances relevant to the investigation in question.
V vsaki preiskavi se odločitev za TGO sprejme neodvisno na podlagi posebnih okoliščin, ki so relevantne za zadevno preiskavo.
The present investigation established that criterion 1 of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation was not fulfilled on the basis of the particular circumstances as discussed above.
V sedanji preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da merilo 1 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe ni bilo izpolnjeno na podlagi posebnih okoliščin, kot je prikazano zgoraj.
Following disclosure, the complainants reiterated that it was questionable that the investments of the exporting producer during the investigation period, including land use rights, could have been financed solely by the retained earnings of the company especially since the company had also paid dividends in the financial year 2013.
Po razkritju so pritožniki ponovno navedli, da je vprašljivo, ali bi se lahko naložbe proizvajalca izvoznika v obdobju preiskave, vključno s pravicami do rabe zemljišč, financirale izključno z zadržanim dobičkom družbe, zlasti ker je v finančnem letu 2013 družba izplačala tudi dividende.
The complainants further claimed that the retained earnings may have been acquired as a result of prior preferential tax rates via the Chinese Hi-tech industries promotion programme.
Pritožniki so nadalje trdili, da je bil zadržani dobiček morda pridobljen kot posledica predhodnih preferenčnih davčnih stopenj prek kitajskega programa za spodbujanje visokotehnoloških industrij.
These claims concerning the second criterion of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation were however not substantiated with any evidence.
Vendar te trditve v zvezi z drugim merilom iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe niso bile podprte z nobenimi dokazi.
Therefore, they were rejected.
Zato so bile zavrnjene.
The complainants also claimed that, the exporting producer did not comply with the international accounting standards as stipulated in the second indent of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation because it did not record appreciation and/or impairment in an asset exchange transaction where a previously acquired land use right was exchanged against a more suitable one.
Pritožniki so trdili tudi, da proizvajalec izvoznik ni spoštoval mednarodnih računovodskih standardov, kot je določeno v drugi alinei člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, saj ni evidentiral okrepitve in/ali oslabitve pri poslu izmenjave sredstev, v okviru katerega je bila predhodno pridobljena pravica do rabe zemljišč zamenjana z ustreznejšo.
However, evaluation of an asset acquired in an asset exchange transaction at the carrying amount of the asset given up (instead of fair value) is an accounting treatment that is also recognised by the international accounting standards.
Vendar pa je ocena sredstva, pridobljenega v poslu izmenjave sredstev, na knjigovodsko vrednost danega sredstva (namesto njegove poštene vrednosti) računovodska obravnava, ki jo priznavajo mednarodni računovodski standardi.
The complainants further claimed that the second indent of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation would not be fulfilled since the accounts of the exporting producer were prepared and audited under the Chinese accounting standards which would be different from the international accounting standards as required by Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Pritožniki so nadalje trdili, da druga alinea člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe naj ne bi bila izpolnjena, saj so bili računovodski izkazi proizvajalca izvoznika pripravljeni in revidirani po kitajskih računovodskih standardih, ki so različni od mednarodnih računovodskih standardov, kot se zahtevajo v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation however showed that, notwithstanding the statutory reference made only to the Chinese accounting standards, the accounting standards applied by the exporting producer were in line with the international standards.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da so bili računovodski standardi, ki jih je uporabil proizvajalec izvoznik, v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi, kljub zakonsko določenemu sklicevanju le na kitajske računovodske standarde.
Finally, the complainants claimed that the Commission should not have evaluated the price paid for the land use rights against reference prices in the PRC but against land prices in third countries such as Taiwan, Indonesia and India.
Pritožniki so trdili, da Komisija ne bi smela oceniti cene, plačane za pravice do rabe zemljišč, v primerjavi z referenčnimi cenami v LRK, ampak s cenami zemljišč v tretjih državah, kot so Tajvan, Indonezija in Indija.
The complainants further claimed that the prices paid for land use rights may have been below the market economy prices.
Pritožniki so nadalje trdili, da so bile cene, plačane za pravice do rabe zemljišč, morda pod tržnogospodarskimi cenami.
However, the claim that the land use rights were below the market prices was not substantiated nor was it consistent with the findings of the investigation which, on the contrary, found that the prices reflected reasonable market prices prevailing in the PRC and were also in line with an independent evaluation report.
Vendar trditev, da so bile pravice do rabe zemljišč pod tržnimi cenami, ni bila utemeljena in tudi ni bila v skladu z ugotovitvami preiskave, v kateri je bilo nasprotno ugotovljeno, da so cene odražale razumne tržne cene, ki so prevladovale v LRK, in bile tudi v skladu z neodvisnim poročilom o oceni.
Finally, as regards the complainants' suggestion that the land use rights should have been evaluated against third country prices, it is recalled that an assessment in accordance with the Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation may, but does not have to, be based on third country prices.
Končno je v zvezi s pripombo pritožnika, da bi bilo treba pravico do rabe zemljišč oceniti v primerjavi s cenami v tretjih državah, treba poudariti, da ocena v skladu s členom 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe lahko temelji na cenah v tretji državi, ni pa nujno.
In any event, the complainants did not put forward any reason to question the appropriateness of the use of independent evaluation report.
V vsakem primeru, pritožnik ni navedel nobenega razloga za dvom v ustreznost uporabe neodvisnega poročila o oceni.
In view of the above considerations and those in the specific disclosure already provided to the exporting producer, the exporting producer could not be granted MET in this investigation.
Na podlagi navedenih premislekov in premislekov v posebnem razkritju, ki so bili proizvajalcu izvozniku že dani na voljo, proizvajalcu izvozniku v tej preiskavi TGO ni mogla biti odobrena.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation normal value should be determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country for the exporting producers not granted MET.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe bi bilo treba za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena, normalno vrednost določiti na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom.
For this purpose, a market economy third country had to be selected (‘the analogue country’).
V ta namen je bilo treba izbrati tretjo državo s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“).
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission informed interested parties that it envisaged Argentina as an appropriate analogue country and invited interested parties to comment.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani obvestila, da namerava uporabiti Argentino kot primerno primerljivo državo, in jih pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe.
The Commission contacted the authorities of five potential analogue countries (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile and India).
Komisija je navezala stike z organi petih morebitnih primerljivih držav (Argentine, Avstralije, Brazilije, Čila in Indije).
The contacts with potential producers in the USA however confirmed that there was no production of tartaric acid in the USA.
Stiki z morebitnimi proizvajalci v ZDA pa so potrdili, da v ZDA ni proizvodnje vinske kisline.
On the basis of the information received, the Commission requested information from 26 potential producers of the like product in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile and India to provide information.
Na podlagi prejetih informacij je Komisija 26 morebitnih proizvajalcev podobnega izdelka v Argentini, Avstraliji, Braziliji, Čilu in Indiji pozvala, naj ji predložijo informacije.
Only one producer in Australia replied and provided the Commission with the requested information.
Odzval se je le en proizvajalec v Avstraliji in Komisiji predložil zahtevane informacije.
The investigation established that domestic production in Australia is in competition with imports of tartaric acid at least from the PRC.
V preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da domača proizvodnja vinske kisline v Avstraliji konkurira uvozu vinske kisline vsaj iz LRK.
There were no duties in force for imports of tartaric acid.
Za uvoz vinske kisline ni bilo veljavnih dajatev.