natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For this reason it is mainly used as a sugar substitute in the soft drink, food and dairy industries.
Zaradi tega se v glavnem uporablja kot nadomestek za sladkor v industriji brezalkoholnih pijač ter v živilski in mlečni industriji.
The investigation showed that preparations and/or mixtures containing aspartame originating in the PRC were in fact not imported into the Union market during the investigation period.
Preiskava je pokazala, da pripravki in/ali mešanice, ki vsebujejo aspartam, s poreklom iz LRK, v obdobju preiskave dejansko niso bile uvožene na trg Unije.
The Commission concluded that due to the lack of imports, preparations and mixtures should not be included in the definition of the product scope.
Ker uvoza ni bilo, je Komisija sklenila, da se pripravki in mešanice ne bi smeli vključiti v opredelitev obsega izdelka.
This clarification of the product definition has no bearing on the findings of dumping, injury, causation and Union interest.
Ta razjasnitev opredelitve izdelka ne vpliva na ugotovitve o dampingu, škodi, vzročni zvezi in interesu Unije.
The definition of the product concerned should therefore be clarified as referring only to aspartame (N-L-α-Aspartyl-L-phenylalanine-1-methyl ester, 3-amino-N-(α-carbomethoxy-phenethyl)-succinamic acid-N-methyl ester), CAS RN 22839-47-0, originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN code ex29242998 (‘the product concerned’, or ‘aspartame’).
Pri opredelitvi zadevnega izdelka bi bilo zato treba pojasniti, da se ta nanaša samo na aspartam (N-L-α-aspartil-L-phenilalanin-1-metil ester, 3-amino-N-(α-karbometoksi-fenetil)-sukcinaminska kislina-N-metil ester), CAS RN 22839-47-0, s poreklom iz LRK, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN ex29242998 („zadevni izdelek“ ali „aspartam“).
the product produced and sold on the domestic market of the country concerned,
izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu zadevne države,
the product produced and sold on the domestic market of Japan, which served as an analogue country, and
izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu Japonske, tj. primerljive države, in
The Commission decided at this stage that those products are therefore like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija se je v tej fazi odločila, da so navedeni izdelki zato podobni izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
For the determination whether the criteria in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation are met, the Commission sought the necessary information by asking the exporting producers to fill in the MET claim form.
Komisija je pri ugotavljanju, ali so merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe izpolnjena, potrebne informacije zbrala tako, da je proizvajalce izvoznike pozvala, naj izpolnijo obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
One sampled exporting producer claimed MET and submitted the MET claim form within the deadline.
En vzorčeni proizvajalec izvoznik je zahteval TGO in predložil obrazec zahtevka za TGO v določenem roku.
The Commission verified the submitted information at the premises of the company concerned.
Komisija je preverila predložene informacije v prostorih zadevne družbe.
The verification showed that the exporting producer did not comply with the criteria set forth in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation and therefore could not be granted MET, in particular shortcomings were found with regard to criteria 2 and 3.
Preveritev je pokazala, da proizvajalec izvoznik ni izpolnjeval meril iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, zato mu ni bilo mogoče odobriti TGO; pomanjkljivosti so bile ugotovljene zlasti glede meril 2 in 3.
The Commission disclosed the detailed findings to the exporting producer concerned, to the authorities of the country concerned and to the Union industry.
Komisija je podrobne ugotovitve razkrila zadevnemu proizvajalcu izvozniku, organom zadevne države in industriji Unije.
The company contested the findings of the Commission and provided written comments on the disclosure.
Družba je izpodbijala ugotovitve Komisije in predložila pisne pripombe na razkritje.
The main substantial comments received are addressed below.
Glavne prejete vsebinske pripombe so obravnavane v nadaljevanju.
Regarding criterion 2, the exporting producer reiterated that it has one clear set of independently audited accounting records, complying with the Hong Kong financial reporting standards.
V zvezi z merilom 2 je izvoznik proizvajalec ponovno poudaril, da ima en jasen sklop računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno revidirajo v skladu s hongkonškimi standardi računovodskega poročanja.
Regarding criterion 3, the exporting producer claimed that the benefits obtained from preferential tax regime(s), grants or purchase of the land-use rights should be considered as similar to a subsidy and therefore should not be assessed in the framework of a MET investigation.
Kar zadeva merilo 3, je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da bi bilo treba koristi, ki izhajajo iz preferenčnih davčnih režimov, nepovratnih sredstev ali nakupa pravice do rabe zemljišč, obravnavati kot podobne subvenciji in se jih zato ne bi smelo ocenjevati v okviru preiskave TGO.
Moreover, the exporting producer claimed that the current assessment of the criteria 2 and 3 contradicts the conclusion of the two previous investigations in which the company requested MET, and in which it was concluded that criteria 2 and 3 were met.
Poleg tega je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da sedanja ocena meril 2 in 3 nasprotuje sklenitvi prejšnjih dveh preiskav, v katerih je družba zahtevala TGO in v kateri je bilo ugotovljeno, da merili 2 in 3 nista bili izpolnjeni.
The Commission recalls that for each investigation the MET decision is made independently, on the basis of the specific circumstances relevant to the investigation and by referring to the current practice.
Komisija opozarja, da se za vsako posamezno preiskavo odločitev glede TGO sprejme neodvisno, na podlagi posebnih okoliščin, pomembnih za preiskavo in s sklicevanjem na obstoječo prakso.
All investigations need to be conducted on a case-by-case basis.
Vse preiskave je treba opraviti za vsak primer posebej.
Concerning the assessment of the preferential tax regime(s) and grants in the framework of the criterion 3, the Commission considers that the purpose of the MET assessment and the anti-subsidy investigation are different in so far as the MET assessment establishes whether a company operates under market-economy conditions, while the anti-subsidy investigation establishes whether a company benefits from countervailable subsidies.
V zvezi z ocenjevanjem preferenčnih davčnih režimov in nepovratnih sredstev v okviru merila 3 Komisija meni, da se namen ocene TGO razlikuje od namena protisubvencijske preiskave, saj ocena TGO ugotovi, ali družba deluje pod pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, medtem ko se v protisubvencijski preiskavi ugotovi, ali ima družba koristi od subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
These two issues have to be dealt with separately, also because the relevant aspect in criterion 3 is whether production costs and financial situation of firms are not subject to significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system and not whether a company benefits from countervailable subsidies [3].
Ti dve vprašanji je treba obravnavati ločeno tudi zaradi tega, ker je pomemben vidik iz merila 3 vprašanje, ali proizvodni stroški in finančni položaj družb niso podvrženi znatnemu izkrivljanju, ki se prenaša še iz predhodnega sistema netržnega gospodarstva, in ne, ali ima družba koristi od subvencije, proti kateri se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi [3].
Regarding the land-use rights transfer price, the Commission considers that the comments received do not change its conclusion that the land-use right was not obtained at market price value.
Kar zadeva ceno prenosa pravic do uporabe zemljišč, Komisija meni, da prejete pripombe ne spreminjajo njene ugotovitve, da pravica do uporabe zemljišč ni bila pridobljena po tržni ceni.
Moreover, the exporting producer requested a hearing chaired by the Hearing Officer.
Poleg tega je proizvajalec izvoznik zahteval zaslišanje pred pooblaščencem za zaslišanje.
This hearing was held on 6 January 2016 and the company could develop all the reasons why it considers that it fulfils the requirements of criteria 2 and 3 of the MET.
To zaslišanje je potekalo 6. januarja 2016 in družba je lahko predstavila vse razloge, na podlagi katerih meni, da izpolnjuje zahteve iz meril 2 in 3 TGO.
However, it was considered after the hearing that the applicant still failed to demonstrate that it fulfilled the requirements of the second and third indents of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar se je tudi po zaslišanju štelo, da vložniku ni uspelo dokazati, da izpolnjuje zahteve iz druge in tretje alinee člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
In particular, the applicant failed to demonstrate that it was not subject to significant distortions carried over from the non-market economy system.
Zlasti pa vložnik ni uspel dokazati, da ni podvržen znatnemu izkrivljanju, ki se prenaša še iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
Indeed, the investigation revealed that the company benefited from preferential tax regime(s), grants and preferential land-use right transfer price and therefore did not fulfil the requirements of criterion 3 of the MET assessment.
Preiskava je dejansko pokazala, da je družba uživala koristi preferenčnih davčnih režimov, nepovratnih sredstev in preferenčne cene prenosa pravice do uporabe zemljišč ter zato ni izpolnjevala zahtev merila 3 v zvezi z oceno TGO.
Given the seriousness of the findings made for criterion 3 it is not considered necessary to further develop the shortcomings found for criterion 2 at this stage of the investigation.
Zaradi resnosti ugotovitev glede merila 3 se dodatna obrazložitev pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih v zvezi z merilom 2, na tej stopnji preiskave ne zdi potrebna.
The Commission informed the exporting producer of the final MET determination.
Komisija je proizvajalca izvoznika obvestila o končnih rezultatih ocene za TGO.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission informed interested parties that it envisaged Japan or South Korea as an appropriate analogue country and invited interested parties to comment.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani obvestila, da namerava kot ustrezno primerljivo državo uporabiti Japonsko ali Južno Korejo, in jih pozvala, naj predložijo pripombe.
Comments were received from the China Chamber of International Commerce, from the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters, as well as from Chinese exporting producers, which all contested the use of Japan as an analogue country.
Pripombe so predložili kitajska gospodarska zbornica za mednarodno trgovino, kitajska gospodarska zbornica uvoznikov in izvoznikov kovin, rudnin in kemikalij („CCCME“) in kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, vsi pa so nasprotovali uporabi Japonske kot primerljive države.
It was claimed that South Korea was a more appropriate analogue country because, among other reasons, the domestic South Korean market was more competitive than that of Japan.
Trdili so, da bi bila Južna Koreja primernejša primerljiva država, med drugim zato, ker je domači južnokorejski trg konkurenčnejši od japonskega.
In order to investigate all possibilities for selecting an appropriate analogue country, the Commission invited all known unrelated importers, the sampled Chinese exporting producers, the China Chamber of International Commerce, and the China Chamber of Commerce of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers & Exporters to provide all relevant information of any potential market economy third countries other than Japan and South Korea.
Da bi proučila vse možnosti za izbiro ustrezne primerljive države je Komisija pozvala vse znane nepovezane uvoznike, vzorčene kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, kitajsko gospodarsko zbornico za mednarodno trgovino ter kitajsko gospodarsko zbornico uvoznikov in izvoznikov kovin, rudnin in kemikalij, da zagotovijo vse ustrezne informacije o morebitnih tretjih državah s tržnim gospodarstvom, razen Japonske in Južne Koreje.
Based on the information available to the Commission, it was confirmed that aspartame was produced in a limited number of countries, namely in the PRC, in Japan, in South Korea and in the Union.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so na voljo Komisiji, je bilo potrjeno, da se je aspartam proizvajal v omejenem številu držav, namreč v LRK, na Japonskem, v Južni Koreji in v Uniji.
Based on the comments received, the Commission contacted a producer known to produce aspartame in South Korea, which however did not agree to cooperate with the investigation.
Na podlagi prejetih pripomb je Komisija stopila v stik s proizvajalcem v Južni Koreji, za katerega je bilo znano, da proizvaja aspartam, ki pa ni želel sodelovati v preiskavi.
A Japanese producer was contacted and it provisionally agreed to cooperate with the investigation.
Vzpostavljen je bil stik z japonskim proizvajalcem, ki je začasno pristal na sodelovanje v preiskavi.
The Commission concluded at this stage that Japan is an appropriate analogue country under Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v tej fazi sklenila, da je Japonska ustrezna primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
The information received from the cooperating producer in the analogue country was used as a basis for the determination of the normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET, pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Informacije, prejete od sodelujočega proizvajalca v primerljivi državi, so se po členu 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe uporabile kot podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena.
Firstly, the Commission examined whether, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the total volume of the sales of the like product to independent customers in Japan was representative.
Prvič, Komisija je proučila, ali je bil v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe celotni obseg prodaje podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam na Japonskem reprezentativen.
To this end, this total sales volume was compared to the total volume of the product concerned exported by each of the sampled Chinese exporting producers to the Union.
V ta namen se je celotni obseg prodaje primerjal s celotnim obsegom izvoza zadevnega izdelka za vsakega od vzorčenih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Unijo.
On that basis, it was found that the like product was sold in representative quantities on the Japanese market.
Na tej podlagi je bilo ugotovljeno, da se je podobni izdelek na japonskem trgu prodajal v reprezentativnih količinah.
Secondly, the Commission identified the product types sold domestically by the producer in the analogue country that were identical or directly comparable with the types sold for export to the Union by the sampled Chinese exporting producers.
Drugič, Komisija je opredelila, katere vrste izdelkov, ki jih je na domačem trgu prodajal proizvajalec v primerljivi državi, so bile enake ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, ki so jih za izvoz v Unijo prodali vzorčeni kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki.
It compared on a product type basis the sales volume in Japan with the exports to the Union by each sampled exporting producer.
Na podlagi vrste izdelka je primerjala obseg prodaje na Japonskem z izvozom vsakega posameznega vzorčenega proizvajalca izvoznika v Unijo.
This comparison showed that all product types were sold in representative quantities in Japan.
Ta primerjava je pokazala, da so se vse vrste izdelka na Japonskem prodajale v reprezentativnih količinah.
The Commission subsequently examined for the analogue country producer whether each type of the like product sold domestically could be considered as being sold in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato proučila, ali se lahko za vsako vrsto podobnega izdelka, ki je bila prodana na domačem trgu, šteje, da je bila prodana v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
The normal value is based on the actual domestic price per product type, irrespective of whether those sales are profitable or not, if the volume sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represents more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average sales price of that product type is equal to or higher than the unit cost of production.
Normalna vrednost temelji na dejanski domači ceni za posamezno vrsto izdelka, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja donosna ali ne, če je obseg prodaje po neto prodajni ceni, ki je bila enaka ali višja od izračunanih stroškov proizvodnje, predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste in kadar je bila tehtana povprečna prodajna cena navedene vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto.
For all product types compared, the normal value could be based on the weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that product type during the investigation period.
Normalna vrednost vseh primerjanih vrst izdelka lahko temelji na tehtanem povprečju cen celotne domače prodaje te vrste izdelka v obdobju preiskave.
Finally, the Commission identified the product types exported from the PRC to the Union and not sold in Japan and constructed normal value based on Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Nazadnje je Komisija opredelila vrste izdelka, ki se izvažajo v Unijo iz LRK in se ne prodajajo na Japonskem, in konstruirano normalno vrednost na podlagi člena 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
To construct normal value for these types, the Commission took the average cost of production of the closest product types produced by the analogue country producer and added a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative (‘SG&A’) expenses and profit corresponding to the weighted average amounts realised by the analogue country producer on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade during the investigation period.
Za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti teh vrst izdelka je Komisija uporabila povprečne stroške proizvodnje najbolj podobnih vrst izdelka, ki jih proizvaja proizvajalec v primerljivi državi, ter dodala razumni znesek za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („PSA-stroški“) ter dobiček, ki ustreza tehtanim povprečnim zneskom, ki ga je s prodajo podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu v običajnem poteku trgovanja v obdobju preiskave ustvaril proizvajalec iz primerljive države.
The three sampled exporting producers exported to the Union either directly to independent customers or through related companies acting as an importer.
Trije proizvajalci izvozniki so v Unijo izvažali neposredno neodvisnim strankam ali prek povezanih družb, ki so delovale kot uvoznice.
If the exporting producers export the product concerned directly to independent customers in the Union, the export price was the price actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Union, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Če proizvajalci izvozniki zadevni izdelek izvažajo neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi cene, ki se je dejansko plačevala ali se plačuje za zadevni izdelek, ko je bil prodan za izvoz v Unijo.
If the exporting producers export the product concerned to the Union through related companies acting as an importer, the export price was established on the basis of the price at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Union, in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Če proizvajalci izvozniki zadevni izdelek izvažajo v Unijo prek povezanih družb, ki so delovale kot uvoznice, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi cene, po kateri je bil uvoženi izdelek prvič prodan naprej neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
In this case, adjustments to the price were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale, including SG&A expenses, and for a reasonable margin of profit.
V tem primeru so bile prilagoditve cene izvedene za vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s PSA-stroški, in za razumno stopnjo dobička.
As regards export prices of the sampled exporting producers, adjustments were made for transport, insurance, handling, credit cost, bank charges and commissions.
V zvezi z izvoznimi cenami vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov so bile izvedene prilagoditve za stroške prevoza, zavarovanja, manipulativne stroške, stroške kredita, bančne stroške in provizije.
Concerning domestic prices of the analogue country producer, adjustments were made for domestic transportation costs, credit costs and handling.
V zvezi z domačimi cenami proizvajalca iz primerljive države so bile opravljene prilagoditve za stroške notranjega prevoza, kreditne stroške in manipulativne stroške.
One exporter requested a currency conversion adjustment to the export price on the basis of Article 2(10)(j) of the basic Regulation.
En izvoznik je zahteval prilagoditev pretvorbe valut izvozne cene na podlagi člena 2(10)(j) osnovne uredbe.
This exporting producer entered into forward foreign exchange settlement agreements in order to neutralise the appreciation of its currency vis-à-vis the currencies normally applied to the export sales, namely the euro and the US dollar.
Ta proizvajalec izvoznik je sklenil pogodbe o valutnih terminskih poslih, da bi izravnal porast svoje valute v primerjavi z valutami, ki se običajno uporabljajo za izvoz, tj. evrom in ameriškim dolarjem.
However, the investigation showed that there was no direct link between foreign exchange contracts and commercial export sales contract.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da ni neposredne povezave med valutnimi terminskimi posli in gospodarsko izvozno prodajno pogodbo.
Therefore, the request was not accepted.
Zahteva je bila zato zavrnjena.
One sampled exporting producer in the PRC claimed that a series of factors should have been examined in order to determine whether an adjustment was warranted in order to ensure a fair comparison between the export price of the sampled Chinese exporters and the normal value established in Japan.
En vzorčen proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK je trdil, da bi bilo treba proučiti vrsto dejavnikov, da bi ugotovili, ali je prilagoditev potrebna, da bi tako zagotovili pošteno primerjavo izvozne cene vzorčenih kitajskih izvoznikov in normalne vrednosti, določene na Japonskem.
These factors concerned the level of trade, the quantity of the sales, physical quality and branding differences, and differences in costs such as research and development, raw material, fixed costs and tax schemes.
Ti dejavniki so zadevali raven trgovanja, obseg prodaje, razlike v fizični kakovosti in trženju blagovne znamke ter razlike v stroških, kot so raziskave in razvoj, surovine, fiksni stroški in davčne sheme.
Concerning the level of trade, no significant difference was found concerning the sales structure or the type of customers of the requesting exporting producer and of the analogue country producer.
V zvezi z ravnjo trgovanja niso bile ugotovljene bistvene razlike v prodajni strukturi ali vrsti strank proizvajalca izvoznika, ki je podal zahtevo, in proizvajalca iz primerljive države.
Similarly, no difference in the physical characteristics of the like product and the product concerned that would justify an adjustment were found to exist.
Prav tako med fizičnimi značilnostmi podobnega izdelka in zadevnega izdelka niso bile ugotovljene nobene razlike, ki bi upravičevale prilagoditev.
Moreover, the investigation did not find that the brand of the analogue country producer would have an effect on the prices such as to justify an adjustment.
Poleg tega s preiskavo ni bilo ugotovljeno, da bi blagovna znamka proizvajalca iz primerljive države tako vplivala na cene, da bi to upravičilo prilagoditev.
The claiming exporting producer did not provide convincing evidence or decisive elements in this sense.
Proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je podal zahtevo, v tem smislu ni predložil prepričljivih dokazov ali odločilnih elementov.