natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The European Council agreed in particular, in the light of the current emergency situation and the commitment to reinforce solidarity and responsibility, on the temporary and exceptional relocation, over two years, from Italy and from Greece to other Member States of 40000 persons in clear need of international protection.
Ob upoštevanju sedanjih izrednih razmer ter zaveze k okrepitvi solidarnosti in odgovornosti se je dogovoril zlasti o začasni in izjemni premestitvi 40000 oseb, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, za dve leti iz Italije in iz Grčije v druge države članice.
It called on the rapid adoption of a Council decision to that effect and concluded that, to that end, Member States should agree by consensus on the distribution of such persons, reflecting the specific situations of Member States.
Pozval je k hitremu sprejetju tozadevnega sklepa Sveta in sklenil, da bi se morale države članice v ta namen soglasno dogovoriti o porazdelitvi teh oseb glede na posebne okoliščine v državah članicah.
The specific situations of the Member States result in particular from migratory flows in other geographical regions, such as the Western Balkans migratory route.
Specifične razmere držav članic so zlasti posledica migracijskih tokov v drugih geografskih regijah, kot je migracijska pot na Zahodnem Balkanu.
Emergency financial assistance by the Commission and operational support by EASO were provided to several Member States to help them cope with this increase.
V enakem obdobju se je tudi Grčija soočila z velikim povečanjem števila nezakonitih prehodov meje, ki je ustrezalo šestkratnemu povečanju v prvih šestih mesecih leta 2014 (več kot 76000 v obdobju med januarjem in junijem 2015 v primerjavi z 11336 v obdobju od januarja do junija 2014).
According to data of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Frontex), the Central and Eastern Mediterranean routes were the main areas for irregular border crossing into the Union in 2014.
Leta 2014 je po podatkih Eurostata v Italiji za mednarodno zaščito zaprosilo 64625 oseb, kar je 143-odstotno povečanje v primerjavi z letom 2013, ko je bilo tovrstnih prosilcev 26920.
In 2014, more than 170000 migrants arrived in Italy alone in an irregular manner, representing an increase of 277 % compared to 2013.
Grčija je z 9430 prosilci zabeležila manjši porast števila prošenj (tj. 15-odstotno povečanje).
A steady increase was also witnessed by Greece with more than 50000 irregular migrants reaching the country, representing an increase of 153 % compared to 2013.
V prvem četrtletju leta 2015 je za mednarodno zaščito v Italiji zaprosilo 15250 oseb (kar predstavlja 47-odstotno povečanje v primerjavi s prvim četrtletjem leta 2014), v Grčiji pa 2615 oseb (kar pomeni 28-odstotno povečanje v primerjavi s prvim četrtletjem leta 2014).
The overall numbers further increased in the course of 2015.
Doslej so bili v okviru migracijske in azilne politike sprejeti številni ukrepi za podporo Italiji in Grčiji, med drugim z znatno nujno pomočjo in operativno podporo, ki jo je zagotovil EASO.
In the first six months of 2015, Italy witnessed a 5 % increase of irregular border crossings as compared to the same period last year.
Italija in Grčija sta bili na drugem in tretjem mestu med upravičenkami, ki so v obdobju 2007–2013 prejele največ finančnih sredstev iz naslova splošnega programa „Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov“ (SOLID), poleg tega pa sta prejeli še znatna finančna sredstva iz naslova nujne pomoči.
Greece faced a sharp increase in the number of irregular border crossings during the same period, corresponding to a six-fold increase over the first six months of 2014 (over 76000 in the period January-June 2015 compared to 11336 in the period January-June 2014).
Ti državi bosta tudi v obdobju 2014–2020 glavni upravičenki do sredstev iz Sklada za azil, migracije in vključevanje.
A significant proportion of the total number of irregular migrants detected in these two regions included migrants of nationalities which, based on the Eurostat data, meet a high Union-level recognition rate.
Zaradi nestabilnih razmer in konfliktov, ki se odvijajo v neposrednem sosedstvu Italije in Grčije, se bo že tako velik pritisk na njuna migracijska in azilna sistema zelo verjetno še stopnjeval, precejšen del migrantov, ki prispejo na njuni ozemlji, pa bo morda potreboval mednarodno zaščito.
According to Eurostat, 64625 persons applied for international protection in Italy in 2014, compared to 26920 in 2013 (which represents an increase of 143 %).
Zato je odločilnega pomena, da se pokaže solidarnost s tema državama in da se podpora, ki se jima že zagotavlja, dopolni z začasnimi ukrepi na področju azila in migracij.
A lesser increase in the number of applications was witnessed by Greece with 9430 applicants (which represents an increase of 15 %).
Obenem bi morali Italija in Grčija kot odziv na izjemne pritiske na njuna azilna in migracijska sistema zagotoviti strukturne rešitve.
In the first quarter of 2015, 15250 persons applied for international protection in Italy (which represents an increase of 47 % compared to the first quarter of 2014) and 2615 persons applied in Greece (which represents an increase of 28 % compared to the first quarter of 2014).
Ukrepe iz tega sklepa bi zato morala spremljati uvedba trdnega in strateškega okvira v teh dveh državah za odziv na krizne razmere in okrepitev procesa reform, ki se že izvaja na teh področjih.
Many actions have been taken so far to support Italy and Greece in the framework of the migration and asylum policy, including by providing them with substantial emergency assistance and EASO operational support.
V zvezi s tem bi morali Italija in Grčija na dan začetka veljavnosti tega sklepa Komisiji predložiti vsaka svoj časovni načrt, ki bi moral vključevati ustrezne ukrepe na področju azila, prvega sprejema in vračanja za krepitev zmogljivosti, kakovosti in učinkovitosti njunih sistemov na teh področjih, pa tudi ukrepe za zagotovitev ustreznega izvajanja tega sklepa, da bi jima po izteku njegove veljavnosti omogočili lažje obvladovanje morebitnega povečanja števila migrantov, ki prispejo na njuni ozemlji.
Italy and Greece were the second and third largest beneficiaries of funding disbursed during the period 2007-2013 under the General Programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’ (SOLID) and, in addition, received substantial emergency funding.
Ob upoštevanju, da se je Evropski svet dogovoril o sklopu medsebojno povezanih ukrepov, bi morala Komisija imeti pooblastilo, da po potrebi in po tem, ko je imela zadevna država možnost predstaviti svoja stališča, začasno odloži uporabo tega sklepa za omejeno obdobje, če Italija ali Grčija ne bi spoštovali svojih obveznosti v zvezi s tem.
Italy and Greece will likely continue to be the main beneficiaries of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) over 2014-2020.
Če bi se katera koli druga država članica zaradi nenadnega prihoda državljanov tretjih držav znašla v podobnem izrednem položaju, lahko Svet na predlog Komisije in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom sprejme začasne ukrepe v korist zadevne države članice na podlagi člena 78(3) PDEU.
Due to the ongoing instability and conflicts in the immediate neighbourhood of Italy and Greece, it is very likely that a significant and increased pressure will continue to be put on their migration and asylum systems, with a significant portion of the migrants who may be in need of international protection.
Takšni ukrepi lahko po potrebi vključujejo zamrznitev obveznosti zadevne države članice, ki so ji naložene s tem sklepom.
This demonstrates the critical need to show solidarity towards Italy and Greece and to complement the actions taken so far to support them with provisional measures in the area of asylum and migration.
V skladu s členom 78(3) PDEU bi morali biti ukrepi v korist Italije in Grčije začasni.
At the same time, Italy and Greece should provide structural solutions to address exceptional pressures on their asylum and migration systems.
Obdobje 24 mesecev je smiselno, da bi ukrepi iz tega sklepa Italiji in Grčiji resnično pomagali pri obvladovanju povečanih migracijskih tokov na njunih ozemljih.
The measures laid down in this Decision should therefore go hand in hand with the establishment by Italy and by Greece of a solid and strategic framework for responding to the crisis situation and intensifying the ongoing reform process in these areas.
Ukrepi za premestitev iz Italije in Grčije iz tega sklepa pomenijo začasno odstopanje od pravila iz člena 13(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [1], v skladu s katerim bi bili Italija in Grčija sicer odgovorni za obravnavo prošnje za mednarodno zaščito na podlagi meril iz poglavja III navedene uredbe, pa tudi začasno odstopanje od postopkovnih korakov, vključno z roki, iz členov 21, 22 in 29 navedene uredbe.
In this respect, Italy and Greece should, on the date of entry into force of this Decision, each present a roadmap to the Commission which should include adequate measures in the area of asylum, first reception and return, enhancing the capacity, quality and efficiency of their systems in these areas, as well as measures to ensure appropriate implementation of this Decision with a view to allowing them to better cope, after the end of the application of this Decision, with a possible increased inflow of migrants on their territories.
Druge določbe Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013, vključno z izvedbenimi pravili iz Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1560/2003 [2] in Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 118/2014 [3], se še naprej uporabljajo, vključno s pravili iz te uredbe o obveznosti države članice, ki izvede predajo, da krije stroške, ki nastanejo pri predaji prosilca v državo članico premestitve, in o sodelovanju pri predajah med državami članicami ter o prenosu informacij prek elektronskega komunikacijskega omrežja „DubliNet“.
Bearing in mind that the European Council agreed on a set of interlinked measures, the Commission should be entrusted with the power to suspend, where appropriate and having given the State concerned the opportunity to present its views, the application of this Decision for a limited period where Italy or Greece does not respect its commitments in this regard.
Ta sklep vključuje tudi odstopanje od privolitve prosilca za mednarodno zaščito, kot je opredeljeno v členu 7(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 516/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].(19) Ukrepi za premestitev držav članic ne odvezujejo od celovitega izvajanja določb Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013, vključno tistimi, ki se nanašajo na ponovno združitev družine, posebno zaščito mladoletnikov brez spremstva in diskrecijsko klavzulo o humanitarnih razlogih.
If any Member State should be confronted with a similar emergency situation characterised by a sudden inflow of nationals of third countries, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, may adopt provisional measures for the benefit of the Member State concerned, on the basis of Article 78(3) TFEU.
Izbrati je bilo treba merila za določitev, kateri prosilci in v kolikšnem številu naj se premestijo iz Italije in iz Grčije, brez poseganja v odločitve v zvezi s prošnjami za azil, sprejetimi na nacionalni ravni.
Such measures may include, where appropriate, a suspension of the obligations of that Member State provided for in this Decision.
Predviden je jasen in obvladljiv sistem, ki temelji na določitvi praga povprečne stopnje na ravni Unije ugodno rešenih prošenj za mednarodno zaščito v postopkih na prvi stopnji, kakor jo je izračunal Eurostat na podlagi najnovejših razpoložljivih statističnih podatkov o vseh prvostopenjskih odločitvah, ki so bile na ravni Unije sprejete v zvezi s prošnjami za azil oziroma mednarodno zaščito.
In accordance with Article 78(3) TFEU, the measures envisaged for the benefit of Italy and of Greece should be of a provisional nature.
Po eni strani bi bilo treba s tem pragom v čim večji možni meri zagotoviti, da lahko vsi prosilci, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, neomejeno in hitro uveljavijo svoje pravice do zaščite v državi članici premestitve.
A period of 24 months is reasonable in view of ensuring that the measures provided for in this Decision have a real impact in respect of supporting Italy and Greece in dealing with the significant migration flows on their territories.
Po drugi strani bi z njim v čim večji možni meri preprečil, da bi bili prosilci, katerih prošnje bodo verjetno zavrnjene, premeščeni v drugo državo članico in bi se s tem neupravičeno podaljšalo njihovo bivanje v Uniji.
The measures to relocate from Italy and from Greece, as set out in this Decision, entail a temporary derogation from the rule laid down in Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [1] according to which Italy and Greece would have been otherwise responsible for the examination of an application for international protection based on the criteria set out in Chapter III of that Regulation, as well as a temporary derogation from the procedural steps, including the time-limits, laid down in Articles 21, 22 and 29 of that Regulation.
Glede na najnovejše posodobljene razpoložljive četrtletne podatke Eurostata o odločitvah, ki so bile sprejete v postopkih na prvi stopnji, bi bilo v treba v tem sklepu uporabiti prag 75 %.
The other provisions of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, including the implementing rules laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1560/2003 [2] and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 118/2014 [3], remain applicable, including the rules contained therein on the obligation for the transferring Member States to meet the costs necessary to transfer an applicant to the Member State of relocation and on the cooperation on transfers between Member States, as well as on transmission of information through the DubliNet electronic communication network.
Namen začasnih ukrepov je ublažiti občuten pritisk na azilna sistema Italije in Grčije, zlasti s premestitvijo pomembnega števila prosilcev, ki bodo na njuni ozemlji prispeli po dnevu začetka uporabe tega sklepa in bodo nedvomno potrebovali mednarodno zaščito.
This Decision also entails a derogation from the consent of the applicant for international protection as referred to in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 516/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].(19) Relocation measures do not absolve Member States from applying in full Regulation (EU) No 604/2013, including the provisions related to family reunification, special protection of unaccompanied minors, and the discretionary clause on humanitarian grounds.
Glede na skupno število državljanov tretjih držav, ki so leta 2014 nezakonito vstopili v Italijo ali Grčijo, ter ob upoštevanju števila tistih, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, bi bilo treba iz Italije in Grčije premestiti skupaj 40000 prosilcev, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito.
A choice had to be made in respect of the criteria to be applied when deciding which and how many applicants are to be relocated from Italy and from Greece, without prejudice to decisions at national level on asylum applications.
Ob upoštevanju ustreznih skupnih razpoložljivih podatkov za leto 2014 in prve štiri mesece leta 2015 v Italiji v primerjavi z Grčijo bi bilo treba iz Italije premestiti 60 % tovrstnih prosilcev, iz Grčije pa 40 %.
A clear and workable system is envisaged based on a threshold of the average rate at Union level of decisions granting international protection in the procedures at first instance, as defined by Eurostat, out of the total number at Union level of decisions on asylum applications for international protection taken at first instance, based on the latest available statistics.
Dne 20. julija 2015 je bila ob upoštevanju posebnih okoliščin v državah članicah soglasno sprejeta resolucija predstavnikov vlad držav članic, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, o premestitvi 40000 oseb, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, iz Italije in Grčije.
On the other hand, it would have to prevent, to the maximum extent possible, applicants who are likely to receive a negative decision on their application from being relocated to another Member State, and therefore from prolonging unduly their stay in the Union.
Sklad za azil, migracije in vključevanje, ustanovljen z Uredbo (EU) št. 516/2014, podpira ukrepe za delitev bremena, o katerih se dogovorijo države članice.
A threshold of 75 %, based on the latest available updated Eurostat quarterly data for first instance decisions, should be used in this Decision.
V členu 7(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 516/2014 je določena možnost, da države članice izvedejo ukrepe v zvezi s premestitvijo prosilcev za mednarodno zaščito v okviru svojih nacionalnih programov, v členu 18 Uredbe (EU) št. 516/2014 pa možnost prejema pavšalnega zneska 6000 EUR za premestitev vsakega upravičenca do mednarodne zaščite iz druge države članice.
The provisional measures are intended to relieve the significant asylum pressure on Italy and on Greece, in particular by relocating a significant number of applicants in clear need of international protection who have arrived in the territory of Italy or Greece following the date on which this Decision becomes applicable.
Ob spoštovanju načela solidarnosti in pravične delitve odgovornosti ter ob upoštevanju dejstva, da ta sklep pomeni nadaljnji razvoj politike na tem področju, bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da države članice, v katere se na podlagi tega sklepa iz Italije in Grčije premestijo prosilci, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, prejmejo pavšalni znesek za vsako premeščeno osebo, ki je enak pavšalnemu znesku iz člena 18 Uredbe (EU) št. 516/2014, in sicer 6000 EUR, in se odobri po enakem postopku.
Based on the overall number of third-country nationals who have entered irregularly Italy or Greece in 2014 and the number of those who are in clear need of international protection, a total of 40000 applicants in clear need of international protection should be relocated from Italy and from Greece.
To pomeni omejeno, začasno odstopanje od člena 18 Uredbe (EU) št. 516/2014, ker pavšalni znesek ne bi bil plačan za upravičence do mednarodne zaščite, temveč za premeščene prosilce.
This number corresponds to approximately 40 % of the total number of third-country nationals in clear need of international protection who have entered irregularly in Italy or Greece in 2014.
Takšna začasna razširitev kroga potencialnih prejemnic pavšalnega zneska je dejansko sestavni del programa nujnih premestitev, ki ga uvaja ta sklep.
Thus, the relocation measure proposed in this Decision constitutes fair burden sharing between Italy and Greece on the one hand and the other Member States on the other.
Uvesti je treba postopek za hitro premestitev, izvajanje začasnih ukrepov pa morata spremljati tesno upravno sodelovanje med državami članicami in operativna podpora, ki jo zagotavlja EASO.
Based on the same overall available figures in 2014 and in the first four months of 2015, in Italy compared to Greece, 60 % of these applicants should be relocated from Italy and 40 % from Greece.
Nacionalna varnost in javni red bi morala biti upoštevana v celotnem postopku premestitve, dokler ni prosilec dejansko premeščen.
On 20 July 2015, reflecting the specific situations of Member States, a Resolution of the representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on relocating from Italy and from Greece 40000 persons in clear need of international protection, was adopted by consensus.
Kadar ima država članica utemeljene razloge za to, da prosilca šteje za grožnjo za svojo nacionalno varnost ali javni red, bi morala o tem obvestiti druge države članice, in sicer ob polnem spoštovanju temeljnih pravic prosilca, vključno z zadevnimi pravili o varstvu podatkov.
Over a period of two years, 24000 persons should be relocated from Italy and 16000 persons should be relocated from Greece.
Pri odločanju o tem, katere prosilce, ki nedvomno potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, bi bilo treba premestiti iz Italije in iz Grčije, bi bilo treba dati prednost ranljivim prosilcem v smislu členov 21 in 22 Direktive 2013/33/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5].
The Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) set up by Regulation (EU) No 516/2014 provides support to burden-sharing operations agreed between Member States and is open to new policy developments in that field.
V zvezi s tem bi se morale prednostno upoštevati posebne potrebe prosilcev, vključno s potrebami, povezanimi z zdravjem.
Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 516/2014 provides for the possibility for Member States to implement actions related to the transfer of applicants for international protection as part of their national programmes, while Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 516/2014 provides for the possibility of a lump sum of EUR 6000 for the transfer of beneficiaries of international protection from another Member State.
Korist otroka bi morala biti vedno najpomembnejše vodilo.
With a view to implementing the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, and taking into account that this Decision constitutes a further policy development in this field, it is appropriate to ensure that the Member States that relocate applicants who are in clear need of international protection from Italy or Greece pursuant to this Decision receive a lump sum for each relocated person which is identical to the lump sum foreseen in Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 516/2014, namely EUR 6000, and implemented by applying the same procedures.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba pri določanju države članice, ki bo država članica premestitve, posebno pozornost posvetiti posebnim kvalifikacijam in značilnostim zadevnih prosilcev, kot so znanje jezikov in druge informacije o posamezniku na podlagi dokazanih družinskih, kulturnih ali socialnih vezi, ki bi lahko olajšale njihovo integracijo v državi članici premestitve.
This entails a limited, temporary derogation from Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 516/2014 because the lump sum should be paid in respect of relocated applicants rather than beneficiaries of international protection.
Kar zadeva posebej ranljive prosilce, bi bilo treba upoštevati zmogljivosti države članice premestitve, da tovrstnim prosilcem zagotovi ustrezno pomoč, in potrebo po zagotovitvi pravične porazdelitve teh prosilcev med državami članicami.
Such a temporary extension of the scope of potential recipients of the lump sum appears indeed to be an integral part of the emergency scheme set up by this Decision.
Ob doslednem spoštovanju načela nediskriminacije lahko države članice premestitve na podlagi navedenih informacij izrazijo svoje preference glede prosilcev, na osnovi katerih lahko Italija in Grčija po posvetovanju z EASO in, kadar je to ustrezno, tudi z uradniki za zvezo, pripravita sezname morebitnih prosilcev, določenih za premestitev v posamezno državo članico.
It is necessary to ensure that a swift relocation procedure is put in place and to accompany the implementation of the provisional measures by close administrative cooperation between Member States and operational support provided by EASO.
Države članice bi z napotitvijo uradnikov za zvezo v Italijo in v Grčijo lahko olajšale učinkovito izvajanje postopka premestitve, vključno z ustrezno določitvijo prosilcev, ki bi bili lahko premeščeni, ob upoštevanju zlasti njihove ranljivosti in kvalifikacij.
National security and public order should be taken into consideration throughout the relocation procedure, until the transfer of the applicant is implemented.
Kar zadeva napotitev uradnikov za zvezo v Italijo in v Grčijo in izpolnjevanje njihovih nalog, bi si država članica premestitve ter Italija in Grčija morale izmenjati vse zadevne informacije, med postopkom premestitve pa bi morale še naprej tesno sodelovati.
In full respect to the fundamental rights of the applicant, including the relevant rules on data protection, where a Member State has reasonable grounds for regarding an applicant as a danger to its national security or public order, it should inform the other Member States thereof.
Pravni in postopkovni zaščitni ukrepi iz Uredbe (EU) št. 604/2013 se še naprej uporabljajo v zvezi s prosilci, za katere se uporablja ta sklep.