natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the gradual decline and insignificant number of EU trade mark applications filed at the central industrial property offices of the Member States and the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property, it should be possible to file an EU trade mark application only at the Office.
Ker število prijav blagovne znamke EU, vloženih na glavnih uradih držav članic za industrijsko lastnino in Uradu Beneluksa za intelektualno lastnino, postopno upada in je zanemarljivo, bi bilo treba dovoliti, da se prijava blagovne znamke EU vloži le na Uradu.
EU trade mark protection is granted in relation to specific goods or services whose nature and number determine the extent of protection afforded to the trade mark proprietor.
Varstvo pod blagovno znamko EU se prizna specifičnemu blagu ali storitvam, obseg varstva, ki se odobri imetniku blagovne znamke, pa določata narava in količina tega blaga ali storitev.
It is therefore essential to establish rules for the designation and classification of goods and services in Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and to ensure legal certainty and sound administration by requiring that the goods and services for which trade mark protection is sought are identified by the applicant with sufficient clarity and precision to enable the competent authorities and economic operators, on the basis of the application alone, to determine the extent of the protection applied for.
Zato je bistveno, da se v Uredbi (ES) št. 207/2009 določijo pravila za določitev in razvrstitev blaga in storitev ter da se zagotovita pravna varnost in dobro upravljanje, tako da se od prijavitelja zahteva, da dovolj jasno in natančno opredeli blago in storitve, ki jih želi zaščititi z blagovno znamko, da bodo pristojni organi in gospodarski subjekti lahko že na podlagi same prijave določili obseg varstva, za katero je vložena prijava.
The use of general terms should be interpreted as only including all goods and services clearly covered by the literal meaning of the term.
Če so uporabljeni splošni izrazi, bi jih bilo treba razumeti, kot da vključujejo le blago in storitve, ki jih tudi jasno dobesedno označujejo.
Proprietors of EU trade marks, which because of the previous practice of the Office are registered in respect of the entire heading of a class of the Nice Classification, should be given the possibility to adapt their lists of goods and services in order to ensure that the content of the Register meets the requisite standard of clarity and precision in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Imetniki blagovnih znamk EU, ki so zaradi nekdanje prakse Urada registrirane za celoten naslov razreda Nicejske klasifikacije, bi morali imeti možnost, da prilagodijo svoje sezname blaga in storitev.
It is appropriate to streamline the regime of EU and national trade mark searches by avoiding unnecessary delays in registering an EU trade mark and to render it more flexible in terms of user needs and preferences by also making the search for EU trade marks optional.
Tako bi zagotovili, da vsebina registra izpolnjuje zahtevani standard jasnosti in natančnosti v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije.
The optional EU and national trade mark searches should be complemented by the making available of all-encompassing, fast and powerful search engines for the use of the public free of charge within the context of cooperation between the Office and the central industrial property offices of the Member States, including the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property.
Ustrezno je racionalizirati sistem poizvedb, kar zadeva blagovne znamke EU in nacionalne znamke, da bi se izognili nepotrebnim zamudam pri registraciji blagovne znamke EU in tako zagotovili večjo prilagodljivost sistema potrebam in željam uporabnikov, tudi tako, da bi bila na voljo možnost poizvedovanja po blagovnih znamkah EU.
As a complement to the existing provisions on Community collective marks and to remedy the current imbalance between national systems and the EU trade mark system, it is necessary to add a set of specific provisions for the purpose of providing protection to European Union certification marks (‘EU certification marks’) which allow a certifying institution or organisation to permit adherents to the certification system to use the mark as a sign for goods or services complying with the certification requirements.
Hkrati z možnostjo poizvedbe, kar zadeva blagovne znamke EU in nacionalne znamke, bi morali biti na voljo tudi obsežni, hitri in zmogljivi iskalniki, brezplačno dostopni javnosti, in sicer v okviru sodelovanja med Uradom in glavnimi uradi držav članic za industrijsko lastnino, vključno z Uradom Beneluksa za intelektualno lastnino.
The experience gained in the application of the current system of EU trade marks has revealed the potential for improvement of certain aspects of procedure.
Kot dopolnilo obstoječim določbam o kolektivnih znamkah Skupnosti in za odpravo sedanjega neravnovesja med nacionalnimi sistemi in sistemom blagovnih znamk EU je treba dodati več posebnih določb za varstvo certifikacijskih znamk Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: certifikacijske znamke EU), ki instituciji ali organizaciji za potrjevanje omogočajo, da se uporabnikom certifikacijskega sistema dovoli, da znamko uporabijo kot znak za blago ali storitve, ki so v skladu s certifikacijskimi zahtevami.
Consequently, certain measures should be taken to simplify and speed up procedures where appropriate and to enhance legal certainty and predictability where required.
Izkušnje pri uporabi sedanjega sistema blagovnih znamk EU so pokazale, da je mogoče nekatere postopkovne vidike izboljšati.
For reasons of legal certainty and in order to provide greater transparency, it is appropriate to clearly define all the tasks of the Office, including those which are not related to the management of the EU trade mark system.
Zato bi bilo treba sprejeti nekatere ukrepe, s katerimi bi – kjer je to ustrezno – poenostavili in pospešili postopke ter po potrebi izboljšali pravno varnost in predvidljivost.
With the aim of promoting convergence of practices and of developing common tools, it is necessary to establish an appropriate framework for cooperation between the Office and the industrial property offices of the Member States, including the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property, defining key areas of cooperation and enabling the Office to coordinate relevant common projects of interest to the Union and the Member States and to finance, up to a maximum amount, those projects.
Zaradi pravne varnosti in večje preglednosti je ustrezno jasno opredeliti vse naloge Urada, tudi tiste, ki niso povezane z upravljanjem sistema blagovnih znamk EU.
Those cooperation activities should be beneficial for undertakings using trade mark systems in Europe.
Da bi spodbudili približevanje praks in razvijanje skupnih orodij, je treba vzpostaviti ustrezen okvir za sodelovanje med Uradom in uradi držav članic za industrijsko lastnino, vključno z Uradom Beneluksa za intelektualno lastnino, v katerem bodo opredeljena ključna področja sodelovanja in ki bo Uradu omogočal usklajevanje ustreznih skupnih projektov, ki so v interesu Unije in držav članic, ter financiranje teh projektov do najvišjega predvidenega zneska.
For users of the Union regime laid down in this Regulation, the projects, particularly the databases for search and consultation purposes, should provide additional, inclusive, efficient tools that are free of charge to comply with the specific requirements arising from the unitary character of the EU trade mark.
Navedene dejavnosti sodelovanja bi morale koristiti podjetjem, ki uporabljajo sisteme blagovnih znamk v Evropi.
To the extent appropriate, certain principles regarding the governance of the Office should be adapted to the Common Approach on EU decentralised agencies adopted by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in July 2012.
Projekti, zlasti zbirke podatkov, ki se uporabljajo za poizvedbe in posvetovanje, bi morali uporabnikom sistema Unije iz te uredbe zagotavljati dodatna, vključujoča, učinkovita in brezplačna orodja za izpolnjevanje specifičnih zahtev, ki izhajajo iz enotnega značaja blagovne znamke EU.
In the interest of greater legal certainty and transparency, it is necessary to update some provisions concerning the organisation and functioning of the Office.
Kolikor je to ustrezno, bi bilo treba nekatera načela glede upravljanja Urada prilagoditi skupnemu pristopu glede decentraliziranih agencij EU, ki so ga julija 2012 sprejeli Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija.
It is desirable to facilitate friendly, expeditious and efficient dispute resolution by entrusting the Office with the establishment of a mediation centre the services of which could be used by any person with the aim of achieving a friendly settlement of disputes relating to EU trade marks and Community designs by mutual agreement.
Zaradi večje pravne varnosti in preglednosti je treba posodobiti nekatere določbe o organizaciji in delovanju Urada.
The setting up of the EU trade mark system has resulted in increased financial burdens for the central industrial property offices and other authorities of the Member States.
Zaželeno je, da bi za spodbujanje mirnega, hitrega in učinkovitega reševanja sporov Uradu zaupali nalogo, da vzpostavi center za mediacijo, katerega storitve bi lahko uporabljali vsi, ki bi želeli doseči poravnavo, kar zadeva spore v zvezi z blagovnimi znamkami EU in modeli Skupnosti.
The additional costs are related to the handling of a higher number of opposition and invalidity proceedings involving EU trade marks or brought by proprietors of such trade marks; to the awareness-raising activities linked to the EU trade mark system; as well as to activities intended to ensure the enforcement of EU trade mark rights.
Vzpostavitev sistema blagovnih znamk EU pomeni večjo finančno obremenitev glavnih uradov za industrijsko lastnino in drugih organov v državah članicah.
It is, therefore, appropriate to ensure that the Office offset part of the costs incurred by Member States for the role they play in ensuring the smooth functioning of the EU trade mark system.
Dodatni stroški so povezani z obravnavanjem večjega števila postopkov ugovora in ugotavljanja ničnosti, povezanih z blagovnimi znamkami EU ali sproženih s strani imetnikov teh blagovnih znamk, pa tudi z dejavnostmi za ozaveščanje o sistemu blagovnih znamk EU in dejavnostmi, s katerimi se zagotavlja uveljavljanje pravic iz blagovne znamke EU.
The payment of such offsetting should be subject to the submission, by Member States, of relevant statistical data.
Zato je ustrezno zagotoviti, da Urad delno izravna stroške, ki jih imajo države članice zaradi svoje vloge pri zagotavljanju nemotenega delovanja sistema blagovnih znamk EU.
The offsetting of costs should not be of such an extent that it would cause a budgetary deficit for the Office.
Izplačilo za tako izravnavo stroškov bi moralo temeljiti na relevantnih statističnih podatkih, ki jih predložijo države članice.
In the interest of sound financial management, the accumulation by the Office of significant budgetary surpluses should be avoided.
Znesek izravnave stroškov ne bi smel biti tako visok, da bi Uradu povzročil proračunski primanjkljaj.
This should be without prejudice to the Office maintaining a financial reserve covering one year of its operational expenditure to ensure the continuity of its operations and the performance of its tasks.
Zaradi dobrega finančnega poslovodenja bi se moral Urad izogniti kopičenju znatnega proračunskega presežka.
That reserve should only be used to ensure the continuity of the tasks of the Office as specified in this Regulation.
To ne bi smelo vplivati na ohranitev finančne rezerve Urada, ki pokriva enoletne operativne odhodke ter s katero se zagotavljata neprekinjeno opravljanje njegovih dejavnosti in opravljanje njegovih nalog.
Given the essential importance of the amounts of fees payable to the Office for the functioning of the EU trade mark system and its complementary relationship as regards national trade mark systems, it is necessary to set those fee amounts directly in Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in the form of an annex.
To rezervo bi bilo treba uporabiti le za zagotavljanje neprekinjenega opravljanja nalog Urada v skladu s to uredbo.
The amounts of the fees should be fixed at a level which ensures that: first, the revenue they produce is in principle sufficient for the budget of the Office to be balanced; second, there is coexistence and complementarity between the EU trade mark and the national trade mark systems, also taking into account the size of the market covered by the EU trade mark and the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises; and third, the rights of proprietors of an EU trade mark are enforced efficiently in the Member States.
Zneski pristojbin, ki se plačujejo Uradu za delovanje sistema blagovnih znamk EU in njegovo dopolnjevanje v zvezi z nacionalnimi sistemi blagovnih znamk, so bistvenega pomena, zato jih je treba določiti neposredno v Uredbi (ES) št. 207/2009 v obliki priloge.
Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 confers powers on the Commission to adopt rules implementing that Regulation.
Zneski pristojbin bi morali biti določeni na ravni, ki zagotavlja: prvič, da prihodek, ki ga zagotavljajo, načeloma zadošča za uravnotežen proračun Urada; drugič, da sistema blagovnih znamk EU in nacionalnih sistemov blagovnih znamk soobstajata in se dopolnjujeta ob upoštevanju velikosti trga, ki ga pokriva blagovna znamka EU, in potreb malih in srednjih podjetij; ter tretjič, da se učinkovito uveljavljajo pravice imetnikov blagovne znamke EU v državah članicah.
As a consequence of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the powers conferred upon the Commission under Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 need to be aligned to Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Uredba (ES) št. 207/2009 Komisiji podeljuje pooblastila za sprejetje pravil o izvajanju navedene uredbe.
As a result, it is also necessary to incorporate certain rules which are currently contained in Commission Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 [8], (EC) No 2869/95 [9], and (EC) No 216/96 [10] into the text of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe je treba pooblastila, ki so bila Komisiji podeljena na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009, uskladiti s členoma 290 in 291 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 should therefore be amended accordingly, and Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 should be repealed.
V skladu s tem je treba v besedilo Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009 vključiti tudi nekatera pravila, ki so trenutno določena v uredbah Komisije (ES) št. 2868/95 [8], (ES) št. 2869/95 [9] in (ES) št. 216/96 [10].
To the extent that the powers conferred upon the Commission under Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 need to be aligned to Article 290 TFEU, it is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level.
Uredbo (ES) št. 2868/95 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti, Uredbo (ES) št. 2869/95 pa bi bilo treba razveljaviti.
The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Ker je treba pooblastila, podeljena Komisiji v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 207/2009, uskladiti s členom 290 PDEU, je zlasti pomembno, da se Komisija pri svojem pripravljalnem delu ustrezno posvetuje, tudi na ravni strokovnjakov.
In order to ensure an effective, efficient and expeditious examination and registration of EU trade mark applications by the Office using procedures which are transparent, thorough, fair and equitable, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the details on the procedures for filing and examining an opposition and those procedures governing the amendment of the application.
Komisija bi morala pri pripravi in oblikovanju delegiranih aktov zagotoviti, da se zadevni dokumenti posredujejo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu sočasno, pravočasno in na ustrezen način.
In order to ensure that an EU trade mark can be revoked or declared invalid in an effective and efficient way by means of transparent, thorough, fair and equitable procedures, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the procedures for revocation and declaration of invalidity.
Da bi lahko Urad na podlagi preglednih, temeljitih, poštenih in pravičnih postopkov učinkovito, uspešno in hitro preizkusil ter registriral prijave blagovnih znamk EU, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 290 PDEU v zvezi z določitvijo podrobnosti o postopkih za vložitev in preizkus ugovora ter tistimi postopki, ki urejajo spremembe prijave.
In order to allow for an effective, efficient and complete review of decisions of the Office by the Boards of Appeal by means of a transparent, thorough, fair and equitable procedure which takes into account the principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the formal content of the notice of appeal, the procedure for the filing and examination of an appeal, the formal content and form of the Board of Appeal's decisions, and the reimbursement of the appeal fees.
Da bi se blagovna znamka EU na podlagi preglednih, temeljitih, poštenih in pravičnih postopkov lahko uspešno in učinkovito razveljavila ali razglasila za nično, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 290 PDEU v zvezi z določitvijo postopkov za razveljavitev in ugotovitev ničnosti.
In order to ensure a smooth, effective and efficient operation of the EU trade mark system, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the requirements as to the details on oral proceedings and the detailed arrangements for taking of evidence, the detailed arrangements for notification, the means of communication and the forms to be used by the parties to proceedings, the rules governing the calculation and duration of time limits, the procedures for the revocation of a decision or for cancellation of an entry in the Register, the detailed arrangements for the resumption of proceedings, and the details on representation before the Office.
Da bi lahko odbori za pritožbe na podlagi preglednega, temeljitega, poštenega in pravičnega postopka, v katerem se upoštevajo načela iz Uredbe (ES) št. 207/2009, uspešno, učinkovito in celovito pregledali odločbe Urada, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 290 PDEU v zvezi z določitvijo formalne vsebine pritožbe, postopka za vložitev in preizkus pritožbe, formalno vsebino in obliko odločb odbora za pritožbe ter povračilo pristojbin za pritožbo.
In order to ensure an effective and efficient organisation of the Boards of Appeal, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the details on the organisation of the Boards of Appeal.
Da se zagotovi nemoteno, uspešno in učinkovito delovanje sistema blagovnih znamk EU, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 290 PDEU v zvezi z določitvijo zahtev glede podrobnosti o ustnem postopku ter podrobne ureditve za pridobivanje dokazov, podrobne ureditve za uradno obveščanje, komunikacijskih sredstev in obrazcev, ki jih uporabljajo stranke v postopku, pravil, ki urejajo izračun in trajanje rokov, postopkov za razveljavitev odločbe ali izbris vpisa v registru, podrobne ureditve za nadaljevanje postopka ter podrobnosti o zastopanju pred Uradom.
In order to ensure the effective and efficient registration of international trade marks in a manner that is fully consistent with the rules of the Protocol relating to the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of specifying the details on the procedures concerning the filing and examination of an opposition, including the necessary communications to be made to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), and the details of the procedure concerning international registrations based on a basic application or basic registration relating to a collective mark, certification mark or guarantee mark.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito in uspešno organizacijo odborov za pritožbe, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 290 PDEU v zvezi z določitvijo podrobnosti o organizaciji odborov za pritožbe.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in respect of specifying the details concerning applications, requests, certificates, claims, regulations, notifications and any other document under the relevant procedural requirements established by this Regulation as well as in respect of maximum rates for costs essential to the proceedings and actually incurred, details concerning publications in the European Union Trade Marks Bulletin and the Official Journal of the Office, the detailed arrangements for exchange of information between the Office and national authorities, detailed arrangements concerning translations of supporting documents in written proceedings, exact types of decisions to be taken by a single member of the opposition or cancellation divisions, details of the notification obligation pursuant to the Madrid Protocol, and detailed requirements regarding the request for territorial extension subsequent to international registration.
Da bi zagotovili uspešno in učinkovito registracijo mednarodnih blagovnih znamk na način, ki je popolnoma skladen z določbami Protokola k Madridskemu sporazumu o mednarodnem registriranju znamk, bi bilo treba Komisijo pooblastiti za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 290 PDEU v zvezi z določitvijo podrobnosti o postopkih za vložitev in preizkus ugovorov, vključno s potrebnim sporočanjem Svetovni organizaciji za intelektualno lastnino, ter podrobnosti o postopku za mednarodne registracije na podlagi osnovne prijave ali osnovne registracije kolektivne, certifikacijske ali garancijske znamke.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [11].
Da bi zagotovili enotne pogoje izvajanja te uredbe, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila,v zvezi z določitvijo podrobnosti o prijavah, zahtevah, potrdilih, zahtevkih, pravilnikih, uradnih obvestilih in drugih dokumentih, povezanih z ustreznimi postopkovnimi zahtevami, ki jih določa ta uredba, ter kar zadeva najvišje stopnje stroškov, ki so potrebni za postopek in so dejansko nastali, podrobnosti o objavah v Biltenu o blagovnih znamkah Evropske unije in Uradnem listu Urada, podrobne ureditve za izmenjavo informacij med Uradom in nacionalnimi organi, podrobne ureditve glede prevodov dokaznih listin v pisnem postopku, natančnih vrst odločb, ki jih sprejme en sam član oddelka za ugovore ali oddelka za izbris, podrobnosti o obveznosti uradnega obveščanja v skladu z Madridskim protokolom ter podrobnih zahtev za ozemeljsko razširitev, ki se vloži po mednarodni registraciji.
Since the objectives of this Regulation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11].