natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The principles of data protection should therefore not apply to anonymous information, namely information which does not relate to an identified or identifiable natural person or to personal data rendered anonymous in such a manner that the data subject is no longer identifiable.
Načel varstva podatkov zato ne bi smeli uporabljati za anonimizirane informacije, in sicer informacije, ki niso povezane z določenim ali določljivim posameznikom, ali osebne podatke, ki so bili anonimizirani na tak način, da posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, ni več določljiv.
Public authorities to which personal data are disclosed in accordance with a legal obligation for the exercise of their official mission, such as tax and customs authorities, financial investigation units, independent administrative authorities, or financial market authorities responsible for the regulation and supervision of securities markets should not be regarded as recipients if they receive personal data which are necessary to carry out a particular inquiry in the general interest, in accordance with Union or Member State law.
Javnih organov, ki so jim bili osebni podatki razkriti v skladu s pravno obveznostjo za izvajanje njihovih uradnih nalog, kot so davčni in carinski organi, finančne preiskovalne enote, neodvisni upravni organi ali organi finančnih trgov, pristojni za regulacijo in nadzor trgov vrednostnih papirjev, ne bi smeli šteti za uporabnike, če prejmejo osebne podatke, ki so potrebni za izvedbo določene preiskave v splošnem interesu, v skladu s pravom Unije ali države članice.
The requests for disclosure sent by the public authorities should always be in writing, reasoned and occasional and should not concern the entirety of a filing system or lead to the interconnection of filing systems.
Zahteve za razkritje, ki jih predložijo javni organi, bi morale biti vedno v pisni obliki, utemeljene in občasne ter ne bi smele zadevati celotne zbirke ali voditi k medsebojnemu povezovanju zbirk.
The processing of personal data by those public authorities should comply with the applicable data protection rules according to the purposes of the processing.
Obdelava osebnih podatkov s strani teh javnih organov bi morala biti v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi o varstvu podatkov glede na namene obdelave.
Genetic data should be defined as personal data relating to the inherited or acquired genetic characteristics of a natural person which give unique information about the physiology or health of that natural person and which result from the analysis of a biological sample from the natural person in question, in particular chromosomal, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or ribonucleic acid (RNA) analysis, or from the analysis of another element enabling equivalent information to be obtained.
Genetski podatki bi morali biti opredeljeni kot osebni podatki, povezani s podedovanimi ali pridobljenimi genetskimi značilnostmi posameznika, ki dajejo edinstveno informacijo o fiziologiji ali zdravju tega posameznika in izhajajo iz analize biološkega vzorca zadevnega posameznika, zlasti analize kromosomov, deoksiribonukleinske kisline (DNK) ali ribonukleinske kisline (RNK) ali analize drugega elementa, ki zagotavlja enakovredne informacije.
Considering the complexity and sensitivity of genetic information, there is a great risk of misuse and re-use for various purposes by the controller.
Glede na kompleksnost in občutljivost genetskih informacij obstaja velika nevarnost zlorabe in ponovne uporabe za različne namene s strani upravljavca.
Any discrimination based on genetic features should in principle be prohibited.
Vsakršna diskriminacija na podlagi genetskih značilnosti bi načeloma morala biti prepovedana.
Personal data concerning health should include all data pertaining to the health status of a data subject which reveal information relating to the past, current or future physical or mental health status of the data subject.
Osebni podatki v zvezi z zdravjem bi morali obsegati vse podatke o zdravstvenem stanju posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, ki razkrivajo informacije o njegovem preteklem, sedanjem ali prihodnjem telesnem ali duševnem zdravstvenem stanju.
This includes information about the natural person collected in the course of the registration for, or the provision of, health care services as referred to in Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [7] to that natural person; a number, symbol or particular assigned to a natural person to uniquely identify the natural person for health purposes; information derived from the testing or examination of a body part or bodily substance, including from genetic data and biological samples; and any information on, for example, a disease, disability, disease risk, medical history, clinical treatment or the physiological or biomedical state of the data subject independent of its source, for example from a physician or other health professional, a hospital, a medical device or an in vitro diagnostic test.
To vključuje informacije o posamezniku, zbrane med registracijo za storitve zdravstvenega varstva ali njihovim zagotavljanjem posamezniku, kot je določeno v Direktivi 2011/24/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7]; številko, znak ali posebno oznako, dodeljeno posamezniku za njegovo edinstveno identifikacijo v zdravstvene namene; informacije, pridobljene s testiranjem ali preiskavo dela telesa ali telesne snovi, vključno z informacijami, pridobljenimi iz genetskih podatkov in bioloških vzorcev, in vse informacije o, na primer, bolezni, invalidnosti, tveganju za nastanek bolezni, zdravstveni anamnezi, kliničnem zdravljenju ali fiziološkem ali biomedicinskem stanju posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, ne glede na vir teh podatkov, na primer zdravnik ali drug zdravstveni delavec, bolnišnica, medicinski pripomoček ali diagnostični preskus in vitro.
All Member States are affiliated to the International Criminal Police Organisation (Interpol).
Vse države članice so pridružene Mednarodni organizaciji kriminalistične policije (Interpol).
To fulfil its mission, Interpol receives, stores and circulates personal data to assist competent authorities in preventing and combating international crime.
Interpol za izpolnjevanje svojih nalog prejema, shranjuje in razpošilja osebne podatke, s čimer pristojnim organom pomaga pri preprečevanju mednarodnega kriminala in boju proti njemu.
It is therefore appropriate to strengthen cooperation between the Union and Interpol by promoting an efficient exchange of personal data whilst ensuring respect for fundamental rights and freedoms regarding the automatic processing of personal data.
Zato je treba izboljšati sodelovanje med Unijo in Interpolom, in sicer s spodbujanjem učinkovite izmenjave osebnih podatkov, hkrati pa zagotavljati spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in svoboščin v zvezi z avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov.
Where personal data are transferred from the Union to Interpol, and to countries which have delegated members to Interpol, this Directive, in particular the provisions on international transfers, should apply.
Pri prenosu osebnih podatkov iz Unije v Interpol in v države, ki imajo svoje predstavnike v Interpolu, bi se morala uporabljati ta direktiva, zlasti določbe o mednarodnih prenosih.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the specific rules laid down in Council Common Position 2005/69/JHA [8] and Council Decision 2007/533/JHA [9].
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v posebna pravila, določena v Skupnem stališču Sveta 2005/69/PNZ [8] in Sklepu Sveta 2007/533/PNZ [9].
Any processing of personal data must be lawful, fair and transparent in relation to the natural persons concerned, and only processed for specific purposes laid down by law.
Vsaka obdelava osebnih podatkov mora biti zakonita, poštena in pregledna za zadevne posameznike ter opravljena le za posebne namene, določene z zakonom.
This does not in itself prevent the law-enforcement authorities from carrying out activities such as covert investigations or video surveillance.
To samo po sebi organom kazenskega pregona ne preprečuje izvajanja dejavnosti, kot so tajne preiskave ali video nadzor.
Such activities can be done for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security, as long as they are laid down by law and constitute a necessary and proportionate measure in a democratic society with due regard for the legitimate interests of the natural person concerned.
Te dejavnosti se lahko izvajajo za namene preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona kaznivih dejanj ali za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij, vključno z varovanjem pred grožnjami javni varnosti in njihovim preprečevanjem, pod pogojem, da so določene z zakonom, so nujen in sorazmeren ukrep v demokratični družbi ter upoštevajo zakonite interese zadevne ga posameznika.
The data protection principle of fair processing is a distinct notion from the right to a fair trial as defined in Article 47 of the Charter and in Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR).
Načelo poštene obdelave v okviru varstva podatkov je pojem, ki je jasno ločen od pravice do poštenega sojenja, ki je opredeljena v členu 47 Listine in členu 6 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP).
Natural persons should be made aware of risks, rules, safeguards and rights in relation to the processing of their personal data and how to exercise their rights in relation to the processing.
Posameznike bi bilo treba opozoriti na tveganja, pravila, zaščitne ukrepe in pravice v zvezi z obdelavo njihovih osebnih podatkov ter na to, kako lahko uresničujejo njihove pravice v zvezi s tako obdelavo.
In particular, the specific purposes for which the personal data are processed should be explicit and legitimate and determined at the time of the collection of the personal data.
Zlasti posebni nameni, za katere se osebni podatki obdelujejo, bi morali biti izrecni, zakoniti in določeni v času zbiranja osebnih podatkov.
The personal data should be adequate and relevant for the purposes for which they are processed.
Osebni podatki bi morali biti ustrezni in relevantni za namene, za katere se obdelujejo.
It should, in particular, be ensured that the personal data collected are not excessive and not kept longer than is necessary for the purpose for which they are processed.
Zlasti bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da zbrani osebni podatki niso prekomerni in se hranijo le toliko časa, kolikor je potrebno za namene, za katere se obdelujejo.
Personal data should be processed only if the purpose of the processing could not reasonably be fulfilled by other means.
Osebne podatke bi lahko obdelovali samo, če namena obdelave v razumnih okvirih ni bilo mogoče doseči z drugimi sredstvi.
In order to ensure that the data are not kept longer than necessary, time limits should be established by the controller for erasure or for a periodic review.
Da bi zagotovili, da se podatki hranijo le toliko časa, kolikor je potrebno, bi moral upravljavec določiti roke za izbris ali reden pregled.
Member States should lay down appropriate safeguards for personal data stored for longer periods for archiving in the public interest, scientific, statistical or historical use.
Države članice bi morale določiti ustrezne zaščitne ukrepe za osebne podatke, ki se zaradi arhiviranja v javnem interesu ali v znanstvene, statistične ali zgodovinske namene shranjujejo za daljše obdobje.
For the prevention, investigation and prosecution of criminal offences, it is necessary for competent authorities to process personal data collected in the context of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of specific criminal offences beyond that context in order to develop an understanding of criminal activities and to make links between different criminal offences detected.
Zaradi preprečevanja, preiskovanja in pregona kaznivih dejanj morajo pristojni organi osebne podatke, zbrane v okviru preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona posebnih kaznivih dejanj, obdelovati zunaj tega okvira, da bi lahko pridobili vpogled v kriminalne dejavnosti ter odkrivali povezave med različnimi odkritimi kaznivimi dejanji.
In order to maintain security in relation to processing and to prevent processing in infringement of this Directive, personal data should be processed in a manner that ensures an appropriate level of security and confidentiality, including by preventing unauthorised access to or use of personal data and the equipment used for the processing, and that takes into account available state of the art and technology, the costs of implementation in relation to the risks and the nature of the personal data to be protected.
Da bi ohranili varnost glede obdelave in preprečili obdelave, ki bi pomenile kršitve te direktive, bi morali biti osebni podatki obdelani na način, ki zagotavlja ustrezno raven varnosti in zaupnosti, vključno s preprečevanjem nedovoljenega dostopa do osebnih podatkov in opreme za obdelavo ali njihove uporabe, in ki upošteva razpoložljive tehnološke ravni in tehnologije, stroške izvajanja glede na tveganja in na naravo osebnih podatkov, ki jih je treba varovati.
Personal data should be collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes within the scope of this Directive and should not be processed for purposes incompatible with the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security.
Osebne podatke bi bilo treba zbirati za določene, izrecne in zakonite namene v okviru področja uporabe te direktive ter jih ne bi smeli obdelovati za namene, ki so nezdružljivi z nameni preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanja kazenskih sankcij, vključno z varovanjem pred grožnjami javni varnosti in njihovim preprečevanjem.
If personal data are processed by the same or another controller for a purpose within the scope of this Directive other than that for which it has been collected, such processing should be permitted under the condition that such processing is authorised in accordance with applicable legal provisions and is necessary for and proportionate to that other purpose.
Če osebne podatke obdeluje isti ali drugi upravljavec za namene v okviru področja uporabe te direktive, ki so drugačni od namenov, za katere so bili zbrani, bi morala taka obdelava biti dovoljena, pod pogojem, da je ta obdelava v skladu z veljavnimi pravnimi določbami ter je za zadevni drugi namen potrebna in z njim sorazmerna.
The principle of accuracy of data should be applied while taking account of the nature and purpose of the processing concerned.
Ob upoštevanju narave in namena zadevne obdelave, bi bilo treba uporabljati načelo točnosti podatkov.
In particular in judicial proceedings, statements containing personal data are based on the subjective perception of natural persons and are not always verifiable.
Zlasti izjave, podane v sodnih postopkih, ki vsebujejo osebne podatke, temeljijo na subjektivnem dojemanju posameznikov in niso vedno preverljive.
Consequently, the requirement of accuracy should not appertain to the accuracy of a statement but merely to the fact that a specific statement has been made.
Zato se zahteva po točnosti ne bi smela nanašati na točnost izjave, ampak zgolj na dejstvo, da je bila določena izjava podana.
It is inherent to the processing of personal data in the areas of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation that personal data relating to different categories of data subjects are processed.
Z obdelavo osebnih podatkov na področjih pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah in policijskega sodelovanja je neločljivo povezano dejstvo, da se obdelujejo osebni podatki v zvezi z različnimi kategorijami posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
Therefore, a clear distinction should, where applicable and as far as possible, be made between personal data of different categories of data subjects such as: suspects; persons convicted of a criminal offence; victims and other parties, such as witnesses; persons possessing relevant information or contacts; and associates of suspects and convicted criminals.
Zato bi bilo treba, kadar je to ustrezno in v največji možni meri, jasno razlikovati med osebnimi podatki različnih kategorij posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, kot so osumljenci, osebe, obsojene za kaznivo dejanje, žrtve in druge osebe, kot so priče, osebe, ki imajo pomembne informacije ali stike, ter udeleženci pri kaznivem dejanju, povezani z osumljenci in obsojenimi storilci kaznivih dejanj.
This should not prevent the application of the right of presumption of innocence as guaranteed by the Charter and by the ECHR, as interpreted in the case-law of the Court of Justice and by the European Court of Human Rights respectively.
To ne bi smelo preprečevati uresničevanja pravice do domneve nedolžnosti, ki jo zagotavljata Listina in EKČP, kot ju razlaga sodna praksa Sodišča in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
The competent authorities should ensure that personal data which are inaccurate, incomplete or no longer up to date are not transmitted or made available.
Pristojni organi bi morali zagotoviti, da se osebni podatki, ki so netočni, nepopolni ali neposodobljeni, ne posredujejo ali dajo na voljo.
In order to ensure the protection of natural persons, the accuracy, completeness or the extent to which the personal data are up to date and the reliability of the personal data transmitted or made available, the competent authorities should, as far as possible, add necessary information in all transmissions of personal data.
Da bi zagotovili varstvo posameznikov, točnost, popolnost oziroma stopnjo posodobljenosti osebnih podatkov in zanesljivost osebnih podatkov, ki se posredujejo ali dajejo na voljo, bi morali pristojni organi v vsak prenos osebnih podatkov, kolikor je to mogoče, vključiti potrebne informacije.
Member State law regulating the processing of personal data within the scope of this Directive should specify at least the objectives, the personal data to be processed, the purposes of the processing and procedures for preserving the integrity and confidentiality of personal data and procedures for its destruction, thus providing sufficient guarantees against the risk of abuse and arbitrariness.
Pravila iz te direktive bi bilo treba uporabljati zlasti za posredovanje osebnih podatkov za namene iz te direktive uporabnikom, za katere se ta direktiva ne uporablja.
The processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security, should cover any operation or set of operations which are performed upon personal data or sets of personal data for those purposes, whether by automated means or otherwise, such as collection, recording, organisation, structuring, storage, adaptation or alteration, retrieval, consultation, use, alignment or combination, restriction of processing, erasure or destruction.
Za takega uporabnika bi morala šteti vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba, javni organ, agencija ali kateri koli drug organ, ki mu je pristojni organ zakonito razkril osebne podatke.
In particular, the rules of this Directive should apply to the transmission of personal data for the purposes of this Directive to a recipient not subject to this Directive.
V primerih, ko je pristojni organ osebne podatke prvotno zbral za katerega od namenov iz te direktive, bi bilo treba za obdelavo teh podatkov za namene, ki jih ne zajema ta direktiva, uporabiti Uredbo (EU) 2016/679, če je takšna obdelava dovoljena v pravu Unije ali države članice.
Such a recipient should encompass a natural or legal person, public authority, agency or any other body to which personal data are lawfully disclosed by the competent authority.
Pravila iz Uredbe (EU) 2016/679 bi bilo treba uporabljati zlasti za posredovanje osebnih podatkov za namene, ki ne sodijo v področje uporabe te direktive.
Where personal data were initially collected by a competent authority for one of the purposes of this Directive, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should apply to the processing of those data for purposes other than the purposes of this Directive where such processing is authorised by Union or Member State law.
Za obdelavo osebnih podatkov s strani uporabnika, ki ni pristojni organ oziroma ne deluje kot pristojni organ v smislu te direktive in mu je pristojni organ osebne podatke zakonito razkril, bi bilo treba uporabljati Uredbo (EU) 2016/679.
In particular, the rules of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should apply to the transmission of personal data for purposes outside the scope of this Directive.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da pri izvajanju te direktive še podrobneje določijo uporabo pravil iz Uredbe (EU) 2016/679 ob upoštevanju pogojev iz navedene uredbe.
For the processing of personal data by a recipient that is not a competent authority or that is not acting as such within the meaning of this Directive and to which personal data are lawfully disclosed by a competent authority, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 should apply.
Da bi bila obdelava osebnih podatkov v skladu s to direktivo zakonita, bi morala biti nujna za opravljanje naloge, ki jo pristojni organ izvaja v javnem interesu na podlagi prava Unije ali države članice za namene preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona kaznivih dejanj ali izvrševanja kazenskih sankcij, vključno z varovanjem pred grožnjami javni varnosti in njihovim preprečevanjem.
While implementing this Directive, Member States should also be able to further specify the application of the rules of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, subject to the conditions set out therein.
Te dejavnosti bi morale zajemati zaščito življenjskih interesov posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki.
In order to be lawful, the processing of personal data under this Directive should be necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest by a competent authority based on Union or Member State law for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security.
Opravljanje nalog preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona kaznivih dejanj je institucionalno preneseno na pristojne organe z zakonom, kar jim omogoča, da lahko od posameznikov zahtevajo ali jim odredijo da izvršijo dane zahteve.
Those activities should cover the protection of vital interests of the data subject.
V takšnem primeru privolitev posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, kot je določeno v Uredbi (EU) 2016/679, ne bi smela predstavljati pravne podlage za obdelavo osebnih podatkov s strani pristojnih organov.
The performance of the tasks of preventing, investigating, detecting or prosecuting criminal offences institutionally conferred by law to the competent authorities allows them to require or order natural persons to comply with requests made.
Kadar mora posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, ravnati v skladu z zakonsko obvezo, ne more dejansko in svobodno izbirati, zato odziva tega posameznika ne bi smeli obravnavati kot prostovoljni izraz njegove volje.
In such a case, the consent of the data subject, as defined in Regulation (EU) 2016/679, should not provide a legal ground for processing personal data by competent authorities.
To državam članicam ne bi smelo preprečevati, da z zakonom določijo, da lahko posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, izrazi soglasje za obdelavo svojih osebnih podatkov za namene te direktive, kot je test DNK v kazenskih preiskavah ali spremljanje njegove lokacije z elektronskimi zapestnicami pri izvrševanju kazenskih sankcij.