natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the amendments to SOLAS Regulation II-1/6 referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 are reviewed at the 97th session of the IMO Maritime Safety Committee, the position to be adopted on behalf of the Union shall be to agree to changes to those amendments that improve the current safety levels.
Stališče, ki se zavzame v imenu Unije in je navedeno v členih 1 in 2, izrazijo države članice, ki so članice IMO, pri čemer delujejo skupaj v interesu Unije.
Article 3
Dogovor o manjših spremembah stališč iz členov 1 in 2 je mogoč brez dodatnega sklepa Sveta.
The position to be adopted on behalf of the Union as set out in Articles 1 and 2 shall be expressed by the Member States, which are members of the IMO, acting jointly in the interest of the Union.
Člen 4
Minor changes to the positions referred to in Articles 1 and 2 may be agreed upon without further decision of the Council.
Države članice so pooblaščene, da soglašajo s tem, da jih v interesu Unije zavezujejo spremembe iz členov 1 in 2, kolikor spadajo v izključno pristojnost Unije.
Member States are hereby authorised to give their consent to be bound, in the interest of the Union, by the amendments referred to in Articles 1 and 2, to the extent that they fall under the exclusive competence of the Union.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na države članice.
Article 5
V Luxembourgu, 17. oktobra 2016
For the Council
Uredba (EU) 2015/757 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2015 o spremljanju emisij ogljikovega dioksida iz pomorskega prevoza, poročanju o njih in njihovem preverjanju ter spremembi Direktive 2009/16/ES (UL L 123, 19.5.2015, str. 55).
The President
Direktiva 2009/45/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. maja 2009 o varnostnih predpisih in standardih za potniške ladje (UL L 163, 25.6.2009, str. 1).
Regulation (EU) 2015/757 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and amending Directive 2009/16/EC (OJ L 123, 19.5.2015, p. 55).
Direktiva 2008/106/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. novembra 2008 o minimalni ravni izobraževanja pomorščakov (UL L 323, 3.12.2008, str. 33).
Directive 2009/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (OJ L 163, 25.6.2009, p. 1).
Direktiva 2003/10/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. februarja 2003 o minimalnih zahtevah za varnost in zdravje v zvezi z izpostavljenostjo delavcev fizikalnim dejavnikom (hrup) (UL L 42, 15.2.2003, str. 38).
Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on the minimum level of training of seafarers (OJ L 323, 3.12.2008, p. 33).
Uredba (EU) št. 530/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. junija 2012 o pospešenem uvajanju zahtev o dvojnem trupu ali enakovrednih konstrukcijskih zahtev za tankerje z enojnim trupom (UL L 172, 30.6.2012, str. 3).
Directive 2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 February 2003 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise) (OJ L 42, 15.2.2003, p. 38).
S spremembami pravila II-1/3-12 konvencije SOLAS bo zapolnjena vrzel v sedanjem pravilu v zvezi z uporabo Kodeksa o ravni hrupa na ladjah za ladje, za katere je pogodba o gradnji sklenjena pred 1. julijem 2014 in katerih kobilice so položene ali ki so v podobni fazi gradnje 1. januarja 2015 ali pozneje, vendar niso dobavljene pred 1. julijem 2018.
Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2078
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/2078
on the State aid SA.41617 — 2015/C (ex SA.33584 (2013/C) (ex 2011/NN)) implemented by the Netherlands in favour of the professional football club NEC in Nijmegen
o državni pomoči SA.41617 – 2015/C (ex SA.33584 (2013/C) (ex 2011/NN)) Nizozemske v korist profesionalnega nogometnega kluba NEC iz Nijmegena
(notified under document C(2016) 4048)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2016) 4048)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu s členom 108(2) Pogodbe [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
In 2010, the Commission was informed by citizens that the Netherlands had implemented an aid measure for the professional football club NEC in Nijmegen.
Državljani so leta 2010 Komisijo obvestili, da je Nizozemska začela izvajati ukrep pomoči za profesionalni nogometni klub NEC iz Nijmegena.
The complaints were registered under numbers SA.31616 and SA.31767.
Pritožbe so bile evidentirane pod številkama SA.31616 in SA.31767.
In 2010 and in 2011, the Commission also received complaints concerning measures in favour of other professional football clubs in the Netherlands, namely MVV in Maastricht, Willem II in Tilburg, FC Den Bosch in 's-Hertogenbosch and PSV in Eindhoven.
Komisija je v letih 2010 in 2011 prejela tudi pritožbe o ukrepih v korist drugih profesionalnih nogometnih klubov na Nizozemskem, kot so MVV iz Maastrichta, Willem II iz Tilburga, FC Den Bosch iz 's-Hertogenboscha in PSV iz Eindhovna.
By letter dated 2 September 2011, the Netherlands provided the Commission with further information on the measure concerning NEC.
Nizozemska je z dopisom z dne 2. septembra 2011 Komisiji predložila nadaljnje informacije o ukrepu v zvezi s klubom NEC.
By letter dated 6 March 2013, the Commission informed the Netherlands that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty in respect of the measures in favour of Willem II, NEC, MVV, PSV and FC Den Bosch.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 6. marca 2013 Nizozemsko obvestila, da bo v skladu s členom 108(2) Pogodbe začela postopek v zvezi z ukrepi v korist klubov Willem II, NEC, MVV, PSV in FC Den Bosch.
The Netherlands submitted observations within the framework of the procedure concerning the measure in favour of NEC by letter dated 6 June 2013, which included the comments from the municipality of Nijmegen (hereinafter: ‘the municipality’) as an interested party.
Nizozemska je v okviru postopka o ukrepu v korist kluba NEC z dopisom z dne 6. junija 2013 predložila pripombe skupaj s pripombami občine Nijmegen (v nadaljnjem besedilu: občina) kot zainteresirane strani.
A meeting with the Netherlands took place on 27 February 2015, in which the municipality also participated.
Sestanek z Nizozemsko, na katerem je sodelovala tudi občina, je potekal 27. februarja 2015.
The Commission received no comments from other interested parties.
Preiskava v zvezi s klubom NEC je bila evidentirana pod številko zadeve SA.41617.
The investigation regarding NEC was registered under case number SA.41617.
Ukrep in njegov upravičenec
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE
Nacionalna nogometna zveza Koninklijke Nederlandse Voetbal Bond (v nadaljnjem besedilu: KNVB) je krovna organizacija za profesionalno in amatersko nogometno tekmovanje.
The measure and its beneficiary
Na Nizozemskem je profesionalni nogomet organiziran v dvotirni sistem.
Professional football in the Netherlands is organised in a two-tier system.
Klub Nijmegen Eendracht Combinatie (v nadaljnjem besedilu: klub NEC) je bil ustanovljen leta 1900, njegove domače tekme pa potekajo v Nijmegenu.
In the 2014/2015 season it consisted of 38 clubs, of which 18 played in the top league (eredivisie) and 20 in the lower league (eerste divisie).
Pravna struktura kluba NEC je naslednja: podjetja Nijmegen Eendracht Combinatie B.V, Exploitatie-Maatschappij De Goffert B.V. in N.E.C. horeca B.V. so v lasti fundacije Stichting Administratiekantoor N.E.C.
Nijmegen Eendracht Combinatie (hereinafter: ‘NEC’) was founded in 1900 and plays its home matches in Nijmegen.
Upravičenec do ukrepa je podjetje Exploitatie-Maatschappij De Goffert B.V..
The legal structure of NEC is as follows: the companies Nijmegen Eendracht Combinatie B.V., Exploitatie-Maatschappij De Goffert B.V. and N.E.C. horeca B.V. are owned by the foundation Stichting Administratiekantoor N.E.C..
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila Nizozemska, je klub NEC srednje veliko podjetje, ki je imela v letu 2015 62,3 zaposlenih s polnim delovnim časom (leta 2010 pa 69,5 zaposlenih s polnim delovnim časom).
The company Exploitatie-Maatschappij De Goffert B.V. is the beneficiary of the measure.
V obdobju, ki je predmet preiskave, je klub NEC tekmoval v prvi ligi.
According to the information submitted by the Netherlands, NEC is a medium-sized enterprise with 62,3 FTE employees in the year 2015 (69,5 FTE in 2010).
Na evropskem turnirju (pokal UEFA) je nazadnje tekmoval v sezoni 2008/2009.
In the period concerned by this investigation NEC played in the top league.
Od leta 2003 naprej je klub NEC glavni – toda ne edini – uporabnik večnamenskega stadiona Goffert, ki se nahaja v obsežnem parku Goffert v Nijmegenu.
It last played in a European tournament (UEFA cup) in the season 2008/2009.
Občina je v parku Goffert leta 2003 s pomočjo Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) poleg stadiona zgradila večnamenski športni objekt De Eendracht.
Since 2003, NEC is the main — but not the only — user of the multifunctional stadium Goffert stadion, located in the large Goffert park in Nijmegen.
Klub NEC je najemnik objekta De Eendracht, za namene treninga pa ga uporabljajo tudi drugi uporabniki.
Next to the stadium in the Goffert park, a multifunctional sports complex De Eendracht was built in 2003 by the municipality with support from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
Razmerje med občino in klubom NEC v zvezi z objektom De Eendracht je določeno v dveh pogodbah, ki sta bili sklenjeni leta 2003: v sporazumu o načrtovanem razvoju območja, kjer se objekt nahaja, v skladu s širšo vizijo športne politike občine ter v zakupni pogodbi za objekt.
The De Eendracht complex is let to NEC and it is also used by others for training purposes.
Klub NEC je leta 2008 in 2009 občinskim organom pisal v zvezi s klavzulo v pogodbah, na podlagi katere je imel pravico do odkupa De Eendrachta od občine.
The relations between the municipality and NEC concerning De Eendracht are laid down in two contracts concluded in 2003: an intention agreement to develop the area where De Eendracht is located in the context of the municipality's broader sports policy vision as well as a lease contract for De Eendracht.
Klub NEC je zvezi s klavzulo, ki je opisana kot nakupna opcija, zapisal, da je bilo zanj predvideno, da bo pridobil „opstalrecht“ oziroma stavbno pravico [3] na objektu.
In 2008 and 2009, NEC wrote to the municipal authorities with regard to a clause in the contracts, according to which it was entitled to acquire De Eendracht from the municipality.
V prvem dopisu je klub NEC predlagal, da se odpove nakupni opciji v zameno za nadomestilo v znesku 2,3 milijona EUR, izračunanem na podlagi ocene knjigovodske vrednosti in dejanske vrednosti objekta, ki jo je podal zunanji izvedenec.
Described as a ‘purchase option’, NEC wrote that it had been the intention for NEC to acquire the ‘opstalrecht’ or right of superficies [3] to the complex.
Po mnenju kluba NEC je razlika med obema vrednostma enaka koristim, ki bi jih prejel z uveljavljanjem svoje nakupne opcije.
In its first letter NEC proposed to waive its purchase option in exchange for compensation of the sum of EUR 2,3 million, which it calculated on the basis of the estimated book value and the real value of the complex according to outside expertise.
Z drugim dopisom je klub NEC občino obvestil, da želi uveljaviti svojo nakupno opcijo.
In a second letter NEC informed the municipality that it wished to exercise its purchase option.
Drugo mnenje je v zvezi z domnevno nespornostjo pravice kluba NEC izrecno zahteval občinski svet.
In 2010, the municipality received legal opinions from two law firms on this issue: one in January 2010, the other in September 2010.
Zaključni sklep tega mnenja je bil, da se je občina zavezala le pogajati s klubom NEC, saj zadevna klavzula ne navaja cene ali cenovnega mehanizma.
The first opinion noted a clause in the lease contract according to which the contract covered the period until De Eendracht would be acquired by the tenant (NEC) and noted that it had been the intention of the municipality and NEC that the complex would be acquired by NEC once there would be no objections to this from the ERDF.
Formalni postopek preiskave se je sprožil v zvezi s to transakcijo, ta pa je zato tudi predmet tega sklepa.
This opinion concluded that there was only an obligation for the municipality to negotiate with NEC, given that the clause in question does not stipulate a price or pricing mechanism.
Komisija je prav tako predhodno sklenila, da je občina nogometnemu klubu NEC s pomočjo državnih sredstev dala selektivno prednost in mu zagotovila pomoč.
The municipality agreed to buy the claim for EUR 2,2 million in September 2010.
Komisija je v zvezi z nakupno opcijo sklenila, da Nizozemska z izključnim upoštevanjem prvega pravnega mnenja in neupoštevanjem obsežnejšega drugega mnenja ni dokazala, da je imel klub NEC nakupno opcijo po ceni, ki ni bila določena v pogodbi in ni bila dogovorjena v pogajanjih.
The Netherlands did not notify, pursuant to Article 108(3) of the Treaty, their intention to reimburse NEC for waiving its purchase option.
Komisija je v zvezi z zneskom, izplačanim v zameno za odpoved domnevni nakupni opciji, in njegovo skladnostjo s trgom ponovila, da smernice iz sporočila Komisije v zvezi z elementi pomoči pri prodaji zemljišč s strani javnih oblasti [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporočilo o prodaji zemljišč), na katere se je sklicevala Nizozemska, „zadevajo le prodaje zemljišč in objektov v javni lasti.
It is in relation to this transaction that the formal investigation procedure was opened and as such it is the subject of the current decision.
Ne zadevajo javnih nakupov zemljišč in objektov ali oddaje oziroma najema zemljišč in objektov s strani javnih oblasti.
Grounds for initiating the procedure
Take transakcije lahko prav tako vsebujejo elemente državne pomoči.“ Nadalje je Komisija navedla, da bi verjetno tudi akterji v tržnem gospodarstvu v primeru obstoja nakupne opcije preučili verjetnost najemnikovega uveljavljanja te opcije.
In the opening decision, the Commission took the position that aid measures to professional football clubs are likely to distort competition and to affect trade between Member States within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Med drugim bi preučili tudi njegova razpoložljiva finančna sredstva.
The Commission moreover arrived at the preliminary conclusion that the municipality had provided a selective advantage to NEC with the use of State resources and had, hence, provided aid to the football club.
Komisija je opozorila, da je imel klub NEC v času dodelitve pomoči finančne težave, ki so bile tako resne, da bi lahko ogrozile njegovo prihodnost v profesionalnem nogometu.
Firstly, with regard to the existence of a purchase option, the Commission concluded that by basing itself exclusively on the first legal opinion and disregarding the more elaborate second opinion, the Netherlands did not demonstrate that NEC had a purchase option at a price that had not been laid down in the contract and that had not been negotiated either.
KNVB je pri preverjanju poslovnega načrta kluba NEC za leto 2010/2011 od kluba NEC julija 2010 zahteval jamstvo v znesku 1967000 EUR, brez katerega bi klub NEC lahko izgubil svojo licenco.
Secondly, with regard to the market conformity of the price paid in exchange for waiving the alleged purchase option, the Commission reiterated that the guidance provided by the Commission Communication concerning aid elements in land sales by public authorities [4] (hereinafter: ‘the land sales Communication’), which had been invoked by the Netherlands, only ‘concerns sales of publicly owned land and buildings.
To jamstvo (ki ga je na podlagi informacij Komisije zagotovilo zasebno komercialno podjetje in ne državna sredstva) je bilo potrebno poleg 2,2 milijonov EUR, ki jih vključuje ta sklep.
It does not concern the public acquisition of land and buildings or the letting or leasing of land and buildings by public authorities.
Klub NEC je junija 2010 izrazil skrb glede svojega finančnega položaja, saj je imel negativen lastniški kapital, negativen poslovni rezultat v letu 2009/2010 in šibek likvidnostni položaj.
Such transactions may also include State aid elements.’
Klub NEC je septembra 2009 prenehal s plačevanjem najemnine.
Furthermore, the Commission stated that operators in a market economy would arguably also look at the likelihood of a tenant exercising his purchase option, presuming it exists.
Za oceno združljivosti pomoči s Smernicami o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Smernice) je Komisija zahtevala informacije o izpolnjevanju vseh zahtev iz Smernic.
They would, inter alia, look at the financial means at his disposal.
Komisija predvsem ni bila zmožna preveriti, če so bili izpolnjeni pogoji iz točk 34–37 Smernic, ki zadevajo naravo in izpolnitev načrta za prestrukturiranje.
Thirdly, the Commission noted that NEC had been in financial difficulties at the time the aid was awarded, serious enough to endanger its future as a professional football club.
Komisija prav tako ni bila zmožna preveriti, če so se sprejeli ustrezni izravnalni ukrepi v smislu točk 38–42.
The KNVB, when verifying NEC's business plan for 2010/2011, had asked NEC for an external guarantee for EUR 1967000 in July 2010, in the absence of which NEC would risk losing its license.
Nadalje je bilo treba dokazati, da je bila pomoč omejena le na potrebni minimum, da je upravičenec izplačal primeren prispevek k prestrukturiranju, da bo Nizozemska zagotovila poročila o spremljanju ter da se bo spoštovalo načelo enkratne pomoči („enkrat in zadnjič“).
This guarantee (which, according to the information available to the Commission, was provided by a private, commercial company and therefore not with State resources) was needed in addition to the EUR 2,2 million covered by the present Decision.
PRIPOMBE NIZOZEMSKE
NEC itself indicated in June 2010 that its financial position was worrying, with a negative equity, a negative operational result in 2009/2010 and a bad liquidity position.
Nizozemska se ne strinja, da ukrep pomeni državno pomoč.
NEC had stopped paying rent in September 2009.
Nizozemska v zvezi s tem poudarja pomembnost konteksta transakcije.
In order to assess the compatibility of the aid with the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring of firms in difficulty [5] (hereinafter: ‘the Guidelines’), the Commission requested information on the compliance with all requirements set out in the Guidelines.
Po njenem mnenju je sklep o začetku postopka vseboval nekaj stvarnih napak.
The Commission was notably unable to verify whether the conditions set out in points 34-37 of the Guidelines concerning the nature and fulfilment of a restructuring plan had been respected.
Nizozemska še zlasti poudarja interes občine za gradnjo vrhunskega športnega in inovacijskega parka (v nadaljnjem besedilu: TIP) [6], v katerega bi se vključila tudi obstoječa stadion Goffert in De Eendracht.
It furthermore needed to be demonstrated that the aid had been limited to the minimum necessary, that the beneficiary itself had paid an adequate own contribution to its restructuring, that the Netherlands would provide monitoring reports and that the ‘one time last time’ principle would be respected.
Objekt De Eendracht je pri občinskem načrtovanju TIP igral pomembno vlogo.
COMMENTS FROM THE NETHERLANDS
Poročilo „Učinek in priložnosti TIP Nijmegen“, ki so ga pripravili občina in svetovalci Buck, še posebej poudarja bistveno funkcijo De Eendrachta pri gradnji TIP.
The Netherlands disagrees that the measure constitutes State aid.
Nizozemska poudarja tudi nespornost pravice kluba NEC.
Contrary to what was stated in the opening decision, the Goffert stadium had a multifunctional nature even before 2003.
Leta 2000 je stavbna pravica nad obstoječim amaterskim objektom pripadala klubu NEC, občina pa je imela v lasti zemljišče, na katerem je objekt bil zgrajen.
The municipality considers the use of De Eendracht (and the Goffert stadium) for non-sports purposes to be an important contextual factor.
Ker objekt ni več izpolnjeval zahtev KNVB za nadaljevanje nogometnih dejavnosti, se je občina leta 2002 v dogovoru s klubom NEC odločila, da zgradi nov večnamenski objekt De Eendracht.
In particular, the Netherlands stresses the interest the municipality had in the development of the top sport and innovation park (hereinafter: ‘TIP’) [6], which would integrate the existing Goffert stadium and De Eendracht.
De Eendracht je bil zgrajen z javnimi sredstvi, delno pa ga je financiral ESRR.
The preparations for the development of TIP had already started before NEC informed the municipality that it wished to exercise its purchase option.
Da bi objekt lahko prejel finančno pomoč ESRR, ga je morala zgraditi občina, prav tako je moral v njeni lasti ostati pet let.
The De Eendracht complex played an important role in the plans with regard to TIP, which were led by the municipality.
Klub NEC se je zato odpovedal svoji stavbni pravici nad objektom, vendar je pridobil nakupno opcijo (za stavbno pravico) nad novim objektom De Eendracht.
The Netherlands underlines that preparations for TIP continued until well after the transaction that took place in September 2010.
Po mnenju Nizozemske je obstajala namera, da bi klub NEC objekt De Eendracht prevzel, ko zahteve ESRR tega ne bi več prepovedovale, četudi se cena nakupa v tistem času še ni določila.
Only in March 2012 did the municipal council decide to halt the TIP preparations.
Nizozemska zato zavrača, da je občina upoštevala le enega od pravnih mnenj (glej uvodno izjavo 14).
According to the Netherlands, the Commission should explicitly take into account the essential importance for the municipality at the time to retain full ownership over De Eendracht (including both the underlying land and the building on it) in order to enable the development of TIP.
Namesto tega poudarja, da v zvezi s pravico, ki sta jo obe stranki šteli za nesporno, med občino in klubom NEC nikoli ni obstajal konflikt.
In this regard the Netherlands refers to the report on the expected economic effects of TIP, published by European and Regional Affairs Consultants in April 2009.
Nizozemska se tukaj sklicuje na člen 6:217 nizozemskega civilnega zakonika, na podlagi katerega se preprosto soglasje med strankama šteje za sklenitev sporazuma.
According to this report, TIP was expected to have a positive impact on the municipality's economy, including an increase in employment and spending, but also various indirect positive economic effects in the areas of knowledge development, innovation, education and overall levels of activity.
Nakupna opcija je razvidna iz pogodbe o nameri in zakupne pogodbe med občino in podjetjem Exploitatiemaatschappij De Goffert B.V.
The report ‘TIP Nijmegen Impact and Opportunities’, prepared by the municipality and Buck Consultants, specifically points towards the exemplary function of De Eendracht in the development of TIP.
(glej uvodno izjavo 9).
Secondly, the Netherlands underlines the solidity of NEC's claim.
Dejstvo, da klavzule o nakupni opciji ne določajo cene ali cenovnega mehanizma, po mnenju Nizozemske ni relevantno.
It has clarified the background that led to the establishment of the purchase option.
Člen 7:4 nizozemskega civilnega zakonika v okviru kupnih pogodb, kjer stranke niso določile nobene cene, določa, da mora kupec plačati „razumno ceno“.
The municipality has highlighted that this is linked to NEC waiving the right of superficies on the then-existing amateur complex, in order to enable the municipality to replace this complex through the realisation of the new complex De Eendracht.
Na kratko, občina trdi, da je odločitev o neupoštevanju drugega pravnega mnenja temeljila na trdnih in utemeljenih razlogih, saj so po njenem mnenju argumenti drugega pravnega mnenja napačni.