natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It should be possible for Member States to indicate additional information in paper format or store it in electronic format, provided this does not amount to additional conditions.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da navedejo dodatne informacije v papirni obliki ali jih shranijo v elektronski obliki, pod pogojem, da to ne pomeni dodatnih pogojev.
The different periods of duration of the authorisations under this Directive should reflect the specific nature of the stay of each category of third-country nationals covered by this Directive.
Različna obdobja veljavnosti dovoljenj na podlagi te direktive bi morala odražati posebno naravo bivanja posameznih kategorij državljanov tretjih držav, zajetih v tej direktivi.
Member States should have the right to determine that the total duration of residence of students does not exceed the maximum duration of studies, as provided for in national law.
Države članice bi morale imeti pravico določiti, da celoten čas prebivanja študenta ne presega najdaljšega obdobja študija, kot je določeno v nacionalnem pravu.
In this respect, the maximum duration of studies could also include, if provided for by the national law of the Member State concerned, the possible extension of studies for the purpose of repeating one or more years of studies.
V tem pogledu bi lahko najdaljše trajanje študija vključevalo, če je določeno v nacionalnem pravu zadevne države članice, možnost podaljšanja študija za namene ponavljanja enega ali več let študija.
It should be possible for Member States to charge applicants for handling applications for authorisations and notifications.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da prosilcem zaračunajo pristojbino za obravnavo prošenj za dovoljenja in pošiljanje uradnih obvestil.
The level of the fees should not be disproportionate or excessive in order not to constitute an obstacle to the objectives of this Directive.
Višina pristojbin ne bi smela biti nesorazmerna ali pretirana, da ne bi ovirali uresničevanje ciljev te direktive.
The rights granted to third-country nationals falling under the scope of this Directive should not depend on the form of the authorisation each Member State issues.
Pravice, zagotovljene državljanom tretjih držav, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te direktive, ne bi smele biti odvisne od tega, v kakšni obliki države članice izdajajo dovoljenje.
In particular, it should be possible to refuse admission if a Member State considers, on the basis of an assessment of the facts in an individual case and taking into account the principle of proportionality, that the third-country national concerned is a potential threat to public policy, public security or public health.
Zlasti bi morala država članica imeti možnost da zavrne sprejem, če na osnovi ugotovljenih dejstev v posameznem primeru in upoštevajoč načelo sorazmernosti meni, da zadevni državljan tretje države morebiti ogroža javni red, javno varnost ali javno zdravje.
The objective of this Directive is not to regulate the admission and residence of third-country nationals for the purpose of employment and it does not aim to harmonise national laws or practices with respect to workers' status.
Cilj te direktive ni urejanje sprejema in prebivanja državljanov tretjih držav za namen zaposlovanja ter harmonizacije nacionalnih zakonov ali praks glede statusa delavcev.
It is possible, nevertheless, that in some Member States specific categories of third-country nationals covered by this Directive are considered to be in an employment relationship on the basis of national law, collective agreements or practice.
Kljub temu je možno, da se v nekaterih državah članicah posebne kategorije državljanov tretjih držav, zajetih v tej direktivi, obravnavajo, kot da so v delovnem razmerju na podlagi nacionalnega prava, kolektivnih pogodb ali prakse.
Where a Member State considers third-country national researchers, volunteers, trainees or au pairs to be in an employment relationship, that Member State should retain the right to determine volumes of admission of the category or categories concerned in accordance with Article 79(5) TFEU.
Kadar država članica obravnava raziskovalce, prostovoljce, pripravnike ali varuške au pair, ki so državljani tretjih držav, kot da so v delovnem razmerju, bi morala ta država članica obdržati pravico, da določi število sprejemov v posamezni kategoriji ali kategorijah v skladu s členom 79(5) PDEU.
Where a third-country national researcher, volunteer, trainee or au pair applies to be admitted to enter into an employment relationship in a Member State, it should be possible for that Member State to apply a test demonstrating that the post cannot be filled from within the domestic labour market.
Kadar raziskovalec, prostovoljec, pripravnik ali varuška au pair, ki so državljani tretjih držav, zaprosi za sprejem zaradi sklenitve delovnega razmerja v državi članici, bi morala ta država članica imeti možnost, da se prepriča, da delovnega mesta ni mogoče zapolniti z domačo delovno silo.
As regards students, volumes of admission should not apply since, even if they are allowed to work during their studies in accordance with the conditions provided for in this Directive, they seek admission to the territory of the Member States to pursue as their main activity a full-time course of study which could encompass a compulsory training.
V zvezi s študenti število sprejemov ne velja, ker tudi v primeru, da smejo delati med študijem v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v tej direktivi, zaprosijo za sprejem na ozemlje države članice z namenom rednega študija kot glavne dejavnosti, ki pa bi lahko zajemal tudi obvezno usposabljanje.
Where, after having been admitted to the territory of the Member State concerned, a researcher, volunteer, trainee or au pair applies to renew the authorisation to enter into or continue to be in an employment relationship in the Member State concerned, with the exception of a researcher who continues the employment relationship with the same host entity, it should be possible for that Member State to apply a test demonstrating that the post cannot be filled from within the domestic labour market.
Kadar po sprejemu na ozemlje zadevne države članice raziskovalec, prostovoljec, pripravnik ali varuška au pair zaprosi za podaljšanje dovoljenja zaradi sklenitve ali nadaljevanja delovnega razmerja v zadevni državi članici, bi morala ta država članica imeti možnost, da se prepriča, da delovnega mesta ni mogoče zapolniti z domačo delovno silo, z izjemo za raziskovalce, ki nadaljujejo delovno razmerje z istim subjektom gostiteljem.
In case of doubts concerning the grounds of the application for admission, Member States should be able to carry out appropriate checks or require evidence in order to assess, on a case by case basis, the applicant's intended research, studies, training, voluntary service, pupil exchange scheme or educational project or au pairing and fight against abuse and misuse of the procedure set out in this Directive.
V primeru, da obstaja dvom glede utemeljitve prošnje za sprejem, bi morale države članice imeti možnost izvesti ustrezne preglede ali zahtevati dokaze, da ocenijo, za vsak primer posebej, prosilčevo nameravano raziskovanje, študij, opravljanje pripravništva, prostovoljsko delo, program izmenjave učencev ali izobraževalni projekt ali delo varušk au pair ter tako preprečile zlorabo in napačno uporabo postopka, določenega v tej direktivi.
Where the information provided is incomplete, Member States should inform the applicant within a reasonable period of the additional information that is required and set a reasonable deadline for providing it.
Kadar so priložene informacije pomanjkljive, bi morale države članice v razumnem roku obvestiti prosilca o dodatnih informacijah, ki se zahtevajo, in določiti razumen rok za njihovo predložitev.
Where additional information has not been provided within that deadline, the application could be rejected.
Kadar dodatne informacije niso predložene v tem roku, bi se prošnja lahko zavrnila.
National authorities should notify the applicant of the decision on the application.
Nacionalni organi bi morali prosilca uradno obvestiti o odločitvi o prošnji.
They should do so in writing as soon as possible and at the latest within the period specified in this Directive.
To bi morali storiti pisno takoj, ko je mogoče, in najpozneje v roku, ki je določen v tej direktivi.
This Directive aims to facilitate intra-EU mobility for researchers and students, inter alia by reducing the administrative burden related to mobility in several Member States.
Cilj te direktive je olajšati mobilnost raziskovalcev in študentov znotraj Unije, med drugim z zmanjšanjem upravnega bremena, povezanega z mobilnostjo v več državah članicah.
For this purpose, this Directive sets up a specific intra-EU mobility scheme whereby a third-country national who holds an authorisation for the purpose of research or studies issued by the first Member State is entitled to enter, stay and carry out part of the research activity or studies in one or several second Member States in accordance with the provisions governing mobility under this Directive.
V tej direktivi je v ta namen uveden poseben sistem mobilnosti znotraj EU, v okviru katerega lahko državljan tretje države, ki ima dovoljenje za namen raziskovanja ali študija, ki ga je izdala prva država članica, vstopi v eno ali več drugih držav članic, v njih biva ali opravlja del raziskovalne dejavnosti ali študija, v skladu z določbami iz te direktive, ki urejajo mobilnost.
In order to enable researchers to move easily from one research organisation to another for the purpose of research, their short-term mobility should cover stays in second Member States for a period of up to 180 days in any 360-day period per Member State.
Da bi raziskovalcem omogočili enostaven prehod iz ene raziskovalne organizacije v drugo za namen raziskovanja, bi morala njihova kratkoročna mobilnost vključevati tudi bivanja v drugih državah članicah za obdobje do 180 dni v posameznem 360-dnevnem obdobju v posamezni državi članici.
Long-term mobility for researchers should cover stays in one or several second Member States for a period of more than 180 days per Member State.
Dolgoročna mobilnost raziskovalcev bi morala vključevati tudi bivanja v eni ali več drugih državah članicah za obdobje, daljše od 180 dni, v posamezni državi članici.
Family members of researchers should be entitled to accompany the researcher during mobility.
Družinskim članom raziskovalcev bi bilo treba omogočiti spremljanje raziskovalca v času mobilnosti.
The procedure for their mobility should be aligned to that of the researcher they accompany.
Postopek za njihovo mobilnost bi bilo treba uskladiti s statusom raziskovalca, ki ga spremljajo.
As regards students who are covered by Union or multilateral programmes or an agreement between two or more higher education institutions, in order to ensure continuity of their studies, this Directive should provide for mobility in one or several second Member States for a period of up to 360 days per Member State.
V zvezi s študenti v programih Unije ali večstranskih programih ali ki so zajeti v sporazumu med dvema ali več visokošolskimi zavodi, bi bilo treba zaradi kontinuitete njihovega študija v tej direktivi zagotoviti mobilnost v eni ali več drugih državah članicah za obdobje do 360 dni v posamezni državi članici.
Where a researcher or a student moves to a second Member State on the basis of a notification procedure and a document is necessary to facilitate access to services and rights, it should be possible for the second Member State to issue a document to attest that the researcher or the student is entitled to stay on the territory of that Member State.
Kadar se raziskovalec ali študent preseli v drugo državo članico na podlagi postopka priglasitve in je za poenostavitev njegovega dostopa do storitev in uveljavljanja pravic potreben dokument, bi morala druga država članica imeti možnost, da izda dokument, ki potrjuje, da ima raziskovalec ali študent pravico do bivanja na ozemlju te države članice.
Such a document should not constitute an additional condition to benefit from the rights provided for in this Directive and should only be of a declaratory nature.
Tak dokument ne bi smel pomeniti dodatnega pogoja za uveljavljanje pravic iz te direktive in bi moral biti zgolj pojasnjevalne narave.
While the specific mobility scheme established by this Directive should set up autonomous rules regarding entry and stay for the purpose of research or studies in Member States other than the one that issued the initial authorisation, all the other rules governing the movement of persons across borders as laid down in the relevant provisions of the Schengen acquis should continue to apply.
Čeprav naj bi s posebnim sistemom mobilnosti, določenim v tej direktivi, uvedli avtonomen skupek pravil glede vstopa in bivanja za namene raziskovanja ali študija v državah članicah, ki niso država članica, ki je izdala prvo dovoljenje, bi bilo treba še naprej uporabljati vsa druga pravila, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja, iz zadevnih določb schengenskega pravnega reda.
Where the authorisation is issued by a Member State not applying the Schengen acquis in full and the researcher, his or her family members or the student, in the framework of intra-EU mobility, crosses an external border within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9], a Member State should be entitled to require evidence proving that the researcher or the student is moving to its territory for the purpose of research or studies or that the family members are moving to its territory for the purpose of accompanying the researcher in the framework of mobility.
Kadar dovoljenje izda država članica, ki ne izvaja schengenskega pravnega reda v celoti, in raziskovalec, njegovi družinski člani ali študent v okviru mobilnosti znotraj EU prečkajo zunanjo mejo v smislu Uredbe (EU) 2016/399 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9], bi morala država članica imeti pravico zahtevati dokazila, ki potrjujejo, da raziskovalec ali študent prihajata na njeno ozemlje za namen raziskovanja ali študija ali da družinski člani prihajajo na njeno ozemlje zaradi spremljanja raziskovalca v okviru mobilnosti.
In addition, in case of crossing of an external border within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 2016/399, the Member States applying the Schengen acquis in full should consult the Schengen information system and should refuse entry or object to the mobility for persons for whom an alert for the purpose of refusing entry or stay, as referred to in Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10], has been issued in that system.
Države članice, ki uporabljajo schengenski pravni red v celoti, bi poleg tega v primeru prehoda zunanje meje v smislu Uredbe (EU) 2016/399 morale opraviti poizvedbo v schengenskem informacijskem sistemu in zavrniti vstop ali izreči nasprotovanje mobilnosti za osebe, za katere je bil v tem sistemu razpisan ukrep zaradi zavrnitve vstopa ali prepovedi bivanja iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1987/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [10].
This Directive should allow second Member States to request that a researcher or a student, who moves on the basis of an authorisation issued by the first Member State and does not or no longer fulfils the conditions for mobility, leaves their territory.
Ta direktiva bi tudi morala omogočati drugim državam članicam, da lahko zahtevajo, da raziskovalec ali študent, ki se preseli na podlagi dovoljenja, ki ga izda prva država članica, in ne izpolnjuje ali ne izpolnjuje več pogojev za mobilnost, zapusti njihovo ozemlje.
Where the researcher or the student has a valid authorisation issued by the first Member State, the second Member State should be able to request that researcher or student to go back to the first Member State in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [11].
Kadar ima raziskovalec ali študent veljavno dovoljenje, ki ga je izdala prva država članica, bi morala druga država članica imeti možnost, da od tega raziskovalca ali študenta zahteva, naj se vrne v prvo državo članico, v skladu z Direktivo 2008/115/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11].
Where the mobility is allowed by the second Member State on the basis of the authorisation issued by the first Member State and that authorisation is withdrawn or has expired during the period of mobility, it should be possible for the second Member State to either decide to return the researcher or the student to a third country, in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC, or request without delay the first Member State to allow re-entry of the researcher or student to its territory.
Kadar druga država članica odobri mobilnost na podlagi dovoljenja, ki ga izda prva država članica, in je to dovoljenje v obdobju mobilnosti odvzeto ali je poteklo, bi morala druga država članica imeti možnost, da bodisi odloči, da se mora raziskovalec ali študent vrniti v tretjo državo, v skladu z Direktivo 2008/115/ES, bodisi brez odlašanja zahteva od prve države članice, da raziskovalcu ali študentu odobri ponoven vstop na svoje ozemlje.
In this latter case, the first Member State should issue the researcher or student with a document allowing re-entry to its territory.
V slednjem primeru bi morala prva država članica raziskovalcu oziroma študentu izdati dokument, ki mu omogoča ponovni vstop na njeno ozemlje.
Union immigration policies and rules, on the one hand, and Union policies and programmes favouring mobility of researchers and students at Union level, on the other hand, should complement each other more.
Politike in pravila Unije glede priseljevanja na eni strani ter politike in programi Unije, ki podpirajo mobilnost raziskovalcev in študentov na ravni Unije, na drugi strani bi se morali bolje dopolnjevati.
When determining the period of validity of the authorisation issued to researchers and students, Member States should take into account the planned mobility to other Member States, in accordance with the provisions on mobility.
Pri določanju obdobja veljavnosti dovoljenja, izdanega za raziskovalce in študente, bi morale države članice upoštevati načrtovano mobilnost v druge države članice, v skladu z določbami o mobilnosti.
Researchers and students covered by Union or multilateral programmes that comprise mobility measures or agreements between two or more higher education institutions should be entitled to receive authorisations covering at least two years, provided that they fulfil the relevant admission conditions for that period.
Raziskovalci in študenti v programih Unije ali večstranskih programih, ki vključujejo ukrepe za spodbujanje mobilnosti, ali ki so zajeti v sporazumu med dvema ali več visokošolskimi zavodi, bi morali biti upravičeni do dovoljenj, ki zajemajo vsaj dve leti, pod pogojem, da izpolnjujejo ustrezne pogoje glede sprejema za to obdobje.
In order to allow students to cover part of the cost of their studies and, if possible, to gain practical experience, they should be given, during their studies, access to the labour market of the Member State where the studies are undertaken, under the conditions set out in this Directive.
Da bi študentje lažje krili del stroškov študija in po možnosti pridobivali izkušnje v praksi, bi morali imeti med študijem dostop do trga delovne sile v državi članici, kjer poteka študij, v skladu s pogoji te direktive.
Students should be allowed to work a certain minimum amount of hours as specified in this Directive for that purpose.
V ta namen bi bilo treba študentom dovoliti, da delajo določeno minimalno število ur, kot je določeno v tej direktivi.
As part of the drive to ensure a well-qualified workforce for the future, students who graduate in the Union should have the possibility to remain on the territory of the Member State concerned for the period specified in this Directive with the intention to identify work opportunities or to set up a business.
Da bi študentom in raziskovalcem za ta namen izdali dovoljenje za prebivanje, za katerega so zaprosili, se lahko zahteva, da predložijo dokazila v skladu z zahtevami te direktive.
Researchers should also have that possibility upon completion of their research activity as defined in the hosting agreement.
Ko države članice izdajo takšno dovoljenje za prebivanje, niso več obravnavani kot raziskovalci ali študentje v smislu te direktive.
In order to be issued a residence permit for that purpose, students and researchers may be asked to provide evidence in accordance with the requirements of this Directive.
Po minimalnem obdobju, določenem v tej direktivi, bi morale države članice imeti možnost preveriti, ali imajo dejansko možnost za zaposlitev ali ustanovitev podjetja.
Once Member States issue them such a residence permit, they cease to be considered as researchers or students within the meaning of this Directive.
Ta možnost ne posega v druge obveznosti glede poročanja, določene v nacionalnem pravu za druge namene.
Member States should be able to check, after a minimum time period established in this Directive, if they have a genuine chance of being employed or of launching a business.
V dovoljenju, izdanem zaradi iskanja dela ali ustanovitve podjetja, ne bi smele biti avtomatično dodeljene nobene pravice dostopa do trga dela ali ustanovitve podjetja.
This possibility is without prejudice to other reporting obligations provided for in national law for other purposes.
Države članice bi morale obdržati pravico, da upoštevajo razmere na svojem trgu dela, ko državljan tretje države, ki mu je bilo izdano dovoljenje, da ostane na njihovem ozemlju za namen iskanja dela ali ustanovitve podjetja, zaprosi za delovno dovoljenje, da zapolni delovno mesto.
The authorisation issued for the purpose of identifying work opportunities or setting up a business should not grant any automatic right of access to the labour market or to set up a business.
Pravična obravnava državljanov tretjih držav, ki jih zajema ta direktiva, bi morala biti zagotovljena v skladu s členom 79 PDEU.
Member States should retain their right to take into consideration the situation of their labour market when the third-country national, who was issued an authorisation to remain on the territory for the purpose of job searching or to set up a business, applies for a work permit to fill a post.
Raziskovalci bi morali biti upravičeni do enake obravnave kot državljani zadevne države članice, kar zadeva člen 12(1) in (4) Direktive 2011/98/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12], ob upoštevanju možnosti, da države članice lahko omejijo enako obravnavo v posebnih primerih, določenih v tej direktivi.
The fair treatment of third-country nationals covered by this Directive should be ensured in accordance with Article 79 TFEU.
Za študente bi bilo treba še naprej uporabljati Direktivo 2011/98/EU, vključno z omejitvami iz navedene direktive.
Researchers should enjoy equal treatment with nationals of the Member State concerned as regards Article 12(1) and (4) of Directive 2011/98/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [12] subject to the possibility for that Member State to limit equal treatment in the specific cases provided for in this Directive.
Za pripravnike, prostovoljce in varuške au pair bi bilo treba uporabljati Direktivo 2011/98/EU, kadar so obravnavani, kot da so v delovnem razmerju v zadevni državi članici.
Directive 2011/98/EU should continue to apply to students, including the restrictions provided for in that Directive.
Pripravniki, prostovoljci in varuške au pair, kadar niso obravnavani, kot da so v delovnem razmerju v zadevni državi članici, kot tudi učenci bi glede minimalnih pravic morali biti upravičeni do enake obravnave, kot so je deležni državljani zadevne države članice, kot je določeno v tej direktivi.
Directive 2011/98/EU should apply to trainees, volunteers and au pairs when they are considered to be in an employment relationship in the Member State concerned.
To vključuje dostop do blaga in storitev, kar ne vključuje štipendij ali posojil za študij ali poklicno usposabljanje.