natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The investigation showed that promotional and incentive costs were mostly tied to client accounts and not to specific sales transactions.
V preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bili stroški promocije in spodbud večinoma vezani na račune strank in ne na posamezne prodajne posle.
Incentives and promotional costs are incurred irrespective of whether the product was finally sold.
Stroški promocije in spodbud nastanejo ne glede na to, ali se izdelek končno proda.
In addition, the investigation revealed that the costs claimed to be linked to a specific sales transaction were in fact not reflected in the price.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da se stroški, za katere je bilo zatrjeno, da so vezani na posamezen prodajni posel, dejansko niso odražali v ceni.
On this basis it was concluded that promotional and incentive costs did not affect prices and price comparability and that this claim should be rejected.
Na podlagi tega je bilo sklenjeno, da stroški promocije in spodbud niso vplivali na cene in primerljivost cen ter da bi bilo treba to trditev zavrniti.
One exporting producer claimed that MSG of large size crystals (mesh size) had different physical characteristics and was sold at a different level of trade when compared to MSG exported to the Union.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je imel MNG v obliki velikih kristalov (velikost mreže) drugačne fizikalne lastnosti in se je prodajal na drugačni ravni trgovine kot MNG, izvožen v Unijo.
The exporting producer argued therefore that MSG of large size crystals should be excluded from the determination of the normal value.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je zato trdil, da bi bilo treba MNG v obliki velikih kristalov izključiti iz določitve normalne vrednosti.
The investigation established that several sizes of mesh existed:
V preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da obstaja več velikosti mrež:
powder, fine, small, regular, and large.
prah, drobci, majhni kristali, navadni kristali in veliki kristali.
All mesh sizes are included in the product scope, as they have the same basic characteristics, end uses and are interchangeable.
Vse velikosti mrež so vključene v obseg izdelka, saj imajo enake osnovne lastnosti, končno uporabo in so izmenljive.
Therefore all product types should be included in the determination of the normal value.
Zato bi bilo treba vse vrste izdelka vključiti v določitev normalne vrednosti.
Furthermore, the investigation established that different mesh sizes were not cost drivers.
V preiskavi je bilo prav tako ugotovljeno, da različne velikosti mrež niso bile odločilne pri določanju cene.
The investigation further showed that customers on the domestic market who bought large size mesh MSG also bought other mesh sizes.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da so stranke na domačem trgu, ki so kupile veliko mrežo MNG, kupovale tudi druge velikosti mrež.
There was no evidence that the price difference observed for large size mesh MSG was linked to physical characteristics or to the level of trade since it was possible to link this price difference to other elements such as customers and volumes purchased.
Ni bilo dokazov, da bi bila ugotovljena razlika v ceni za velike mreže MNG povezana s fizikalnimi lastnostmi ali z ravnjo trgovine, saj je bilo mogoče to razliko v ceni povezati z drugimi elementi, kot so stranke in kupljene količine.
Moreover, the exporting producer did not quantify the alleged difference in physical characteristics.
Poleg tega proizvajalec izvoznik ni količinsko opredelil domnevne razlike v fizikalnih lastnostih.
Therefore the arguments made in this regard should be rejected.
Zato bi bilo treba argumente v zvezi s tem zavrniti.
In the absence of any other comments regarding comparison, the conclusions reached in recitals 39 to 46 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi s primerjavo, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 39 do 46 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments, the methodology used for calculating the dumping margins, as set out in recitals 47 to 48 of the provisional Regulation, is confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se potrdi metodologija za izračun stopenj dampinga, kot so določene v uvodnih izjavah 47 in 48 začasne uredbe.
Taking into account the exclusion of certain transactions from the determination of the export price of one exporting producer as described in recital 25, and in the absence of any further comments, the definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF (cost, insurance, freight) Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Ob upoštevanju izključitve nekaterih transakcij iz določitve izvozne cene enega proizvajalca izvoznika, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 25, in ker ni bilo dodatnih pripomb, so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF (stroški, zavarovanje in prevoznina) meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
Interested parties reiterated that the Commission should exclude the cooperating Union producer from the Union industry due to the non-cooperation of an exporting producer in Indonesia related to it.
Zainteresirane strani so ponovno navedle, da bi morala Komisija izključiti sodelujočega proizvajalca Unije iz industrije Unije zaradi nesodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v Indoneziji, povezanega z njim.
It was argued that the injury picture may be affected by this relationship.
Navedba je bila podprta z argumentom, da bi lahko to razmerje vplivalo na sliko o škodi.
The parties concerned did not bring forward any new information or evidence in this respect.
Zadevne strani niso predložile nobenih novih informacij ali dokazov v zvezi s tem.
In particular, they did not substantiate their claim as to what extent the injury picture could have been affected.
Predvsem niso utemeljile svoje trditve v smislu obsega morebitnega vpliva na sliko o škodi.
As set out in recital 53 of the provisional Regulation, in this case there is no need to exclude the cooperating Union producer from the Union industry despite its relationship with the non-cooperating exporting producer in Indonesia because this sole Union producer fully cooperated with the Commission during the investigation and was subject to a full verification.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 53 začasne uredbe, v tem primeru ni potrebe po izključitvi sodelujočega proizvajalca Unije iz industrije Unije, čeprav je povezan z nesodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v Indoneziji, saj je ta edini proizvajalec Unije v preiskavi v celoti sodeloval s Komisijo in je bil v celoti preverjen.
Hence, the failure by an Indonesian exporting producer to cooperate in the investigation did not have any impact on the running of the investigation.
Nesodelovanje proizvajalca izvoznika iz Indonezije v preiskavi torej ni vplivalo na vodenje preiskave.
Therefore, this argument should be rejected.
Zato bi bilo treba ta argument zavrniti.
After disclosure, the parties concerned reiterated their argument that the cooperating Union producer should be excluded from the Union industry due to the non-cooperation of an exporting producer in Indonesia related to it.
Po razkritju so zadevne strani ponovno navedle, da bi moral biti sodelujoči proizvajalec Unije izključen iz industrije Unije zaradi nesodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v Indoneziji, povezanega z njim.
These parties argued that the non-cooperation of the related exporting producer in Indonesia could have affected the injury picture of the Union industry.
Trdile so, da bi lahko nesodelovanje povezanega proizvajalca izvoznika v Indoneziji vplivalo na sliko o škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
In substance, they argued that prices of MSG would be negotiated on a global worldwide basis and that due to the relationship there was a risk of cross compensation consisting in lowering prices to customers in the Union market and charging higher prices in a third country market.
Dejansko so trdile, da bi pogajanja o cenah MNG potekala na svetovni ravni in da zaradi zadevnega odnosa obstaja tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije, ki pomeni nižanje cen za stranke na trgu Unije in zaračunavanje višjih cen na trgih tretjih držav.
By not cooperating with the investigation, the related exporting producer in Indonesia would deprive the Commission from the possibility to check whether cross compensation took place.
S tem, ko ni sodeloval v preiskavi, bi povezani proizvajalec izvoznik v Indoneziji Komisiji onemogočil, da bi preverila, ali je prišlo do navzkrižne kompenzacije.
The parties concerned limited themselves to raise the argument without however substantiating it with any actual evidence.
Zadevne strani so se omejile na izpostavitev tega argumenta, ne da bi ga utemeljile s konkretnimi dejstvi.
In any event, as regards prices charged by the Union producer to its customers in the Union market, which were verified during the investigation, there was no indication that these prices were lowered for reasons of cross compensation.
V vsakem primeru, kar zadeva cene, ki jih je proizvajalec Unije zaračunaval svojim strankam na trgu Unije, ki so bile med preiskavo preverjene, ni bilo znakov, da bi bile te cene znižane za namene navzkrižne kompenzacije.
To the contrary, as mentioned in recital 100 of the provisional Regulation, imports prices from Indonesia decreased by 8 % over the period considered which exerted a price pressure on the Union market so that the Union industry could not raise its prices in line with the increase in its costs.
Nasprotno, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 100 začasne uredbe, so se uvozne cene iz Indonezije zmanjšale za 8 % v obravnavanem obdobju, kar je povzročilo cenovni pritisk na trg Unije, tako da industrija Unije ni mogla dvigniti svojih cen v skladu s povečanjem njenih stroškov.
Therefore the Union industry as a whole was forced to decrease its prices over the period considered.
Zato je bila vsa industrija Unije prisiljena v obravnavanem obdobju znižati svoje cene.
The argument was therefore rejected.
Ta argument je bil zato zavrnjen.
In the absence of any other comments with respect to the definition of the Union industry and Union production the conclusions set out in recitals 50 and 51 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi z opredelitvijo pojmov industrija Unije in proizvodnja Unije, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 50 in 51 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
After provisional disclosure, one interested party claimed that the description of the development of the Union consumption in recital 55 of the provisional Regulation was incomplete.
Po začasnem razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran trdila, da opis razvoja potrošnje Unije v uvodni izjavi 55 začasne uredbe ni bil popoln.
In particular, this party argued that the decrease in consumption from FY2010/2011 to FY2011/2012 was due to the fact that imports from Vietnam were replaced by cheaper imports from Indonesia and that therefore, customers in the Union, no longer expecting price increases, sold their accumulated stocks with the effect that the overall sales volume in the Union decreased.
Ta stran je zlasti trdila, da je bilo zmanjšanje potrošnje med poslovnima letoma 2010/2011 in 2011/2012 posledica dejstva, da je uvoz iz Vietnama nadomestil cenejši uvoz iz Indonezije ter da so zato stranke v Uniji, ki niso več pričakovale zvišanja cen, prodale svoje akumulirane zaloge, kar je povzročilo splošno zmanjšanje obsega prodaje v Uniji.
The circumstances described by the interested party concerned did not contradict as such the conclusions set out in recital 55 of the provisional Regulation that the decrease in consumption between FY2010/2011 and FY2011/2012 was mainly due to a decrease in the sales of the Union industry on the Union market.
Okoliščine, ki jih je opisala zadevna zainteresirana stran, kot take niso v nasprotju s sklepi iz uvodne izjave 55 začasne uredbe, v skladu s katerimi je bilo zmanjšanje potrošnje med poslovnim letom 2010/2011 in poslovnim letom 2011/2012 predvsem posledica zmanjšanja prodaje industrije Unije na trgu Unije.
In specific, between FY2010/2011 and FY2011/2012, both the sales of the Union industry and the imports from third countries decreased.
Natančneje, med poslovnima letoma 2010/2011 in 2011/2012 sta se zmanjšala prodaja industrije Unije in uvoz iz tretjih držav.
However, while total imports only decreased by 2 % (see recital 107 of the provisional Regulation) sales volume of the Union industry dropped by 16 % (recital 72 of the provisional Regulation).
Vendar, medtem ko se je celotni uvoz zmanjšal le za 2 % (glej uvodno izjavo 107 začasne uredbe), je obseg prodaje industrije Unije upadel za 16 % (uvodna izjava 72 začasne uredbe).
The decrease in sales volume from the Union industry coincided with a decrease in the Union industry's production volume as shown in the table in recital 68 of the provisional Regulation.
Zmanjšanje obsega prodaje iz industrije Unije je sovpadalo z zmanjšanjem obsega proizvodnje industrije Unije, kot je prikazano v preglednici iz uvodne izjave 68 začasne uredbe.
However, as shown in the table in recital 104 of the provisional Regulation, imports from Vietnam between FY2010/2011 and FY2011/2012 increased, in contrast to what was claimed by the interested party concerned, while imports from other third countries, such as Brazil dropped by almost 60 % during the same period.
Vendar, kot je prikazano v preglednici iz uvodne izjave 104 začasne uredbe, se je uvoz iz Vietnama med poslovnima letoma 2010/2011 in 2011/2012 povečal, kar je v nasprotju s trditvami zadevne zainteresirane strani, medtem ko je uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav, kot je Brazilija, v istem obdobju upadel za skoraj 60 %.
The assumption that imports from Vietnam were replaced by imports from Indonesia is therefore not confirmed by the findings.
Ugotovitve torej ne potrjujejo predpostavke, da je uvoz iz Indonezije nadomestil uvoz iz Vietnama.
Moreover, the party concerned did not substantiate its claim that users had accumulated stocks prior to the period considered and that they sold these in increased quantities when imports from Indonesia increased.
Poleg tega zadevna stran ni utemeljila svoje trditve, da so uporabniki zaloge akumulirali pred obravnavanim obdobjem in da so te zaloge v večjem obsegu prodajali po povečanju uvoza iz Indonezije.
These allegations could also not be confirmed during the investigation.
Tudi teh domnev med preiskavo ni bilo mogoče potrditi.
The interested party's claims in this respect should therefore be rejected.
Trditve zainteresirane strani v zvezi s tem bi bilo zato treba zavrniti.
In the absence of any other comments with respect to Union consumption, the conclusions set out in recitals 52 to 55 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi s potrošnjo Unije, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 52 do 55 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments concerning the imports from the country concerned, the conclusions set out in recitals 56 to 66 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb v zvezi z uvozom iz zadevne države, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 56 do 66 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One interested party claimed that although production volume and capacity utilisation decreased during the period considered this was only a consequence of a substantial increase before that period.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da sta se obseg proizvodnje in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti v obravnavanem obdobju sicer zmanjšala, toda to je zgolj posledica znatnega povečanja pred navedenim obdobjem.
This party claimed that, therefore, the decrease in the period considered was not to be considered as a negative development and would not show injury.
Ta stran je trdila, da se zato zmanjšanje v obravnavanem obdobju ne sme šteti kot negativno gibanje in ne bi kazalo škode.
However, only trends established during the period considered are normally taken into account when assessing the development of the injury indicators.
Vendar se običajno pri oceni razvoja kazalcev škode upoštevajo le gibanja, ugotovljena v obravnavanem obdobju.
In the present case there was no valid reason to deviate from this practice and to assess the developments of the injury indicators over an extended period.
V tem primeru ni bilo upravičenega razloga za odstopanje od te prakse in za oceno razvoja kazalcev škode v daljšem obdobju.
This argument should therefore be rejected.
Ta argument bi bilo treba torej zavrniti.
The same interested party alleged that the possible inclusion of by-products may have inflated the costs of production of the Union industry which would also have had an impact on profitability.
Ista zainteresirana stran je trdila, da bi lahko morebitna vključitev stranskih izdelkov umetno zvišala stroške proizvodnje industrije Unije, kar bi tudi vplivalo na dobičkonosnost.
This allegation was incorrect.
Ta trditev je bila napačna.
The Union industry's cost of production, including by-products were subject to verification and the completeness and correctness of costs have been satisfactorily established.
Proizvodni stroški industrije Unije, vključno s stranskimi izdelki, so bili preverjeni.
This claim should therefore be rejected.
Njihova popolnost in resničnost sta bili zadovoljivo ugotovljeni.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the development of the injury indicators, the conclusions set out in recitals 67 to 93 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
To trditev bi bilo treba torej zavrniti.
Conclusion on injury
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi z razvojem kazalcev škode, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 67 do 93 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One interested party claimed that not all injury indicators showed a negative trend and that the existence of a negative trend in only a few injury indicators is not sufficient to conclude that the Union industry suffered material injury.
Sklep o škodi
Under Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation not all injury indicators must have a negative trend to conclude on the existence of injury.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da niso vsi kazalci škode kazali negativnega gibanja in da obstoj negativnega gibanja v zgolj nekaj kazalcih škode ne zadošča za sklep, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo.
In addition, the claim was incorrect as the investigation has shown that almost all injury indicators showed a negative trend during the period considered.
V skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe ni treba, da imajo negativno gibanje vsi kazalci škode, da bi bilo mogoče ugotoviti obstoj škode.
The claims should therefore be rejected.
Poleg tega je bila trditev napačna, saj je preiskava pokazala, da so negativno gibanje v obravnavanem obdobju kazali skoraj vsi kazalci škode.
On the basis of the above and in the absence of any other comments, the conclusions set out in recitals 94 to 96 of the provisional Regulation that the Union industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation were confirmed.
Te trditve bi bilo treba torej zavrniti.
E. CAUSATION
Na podlagi navedenega in ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 94 do 96 začasne uredbe, in sicer, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe, potrdijo.
Effect of the dumped imports
E. VZROČNA ZVEZA
One party claimed that given the findings set out in recital 66 of the provisional Regulation, that is that the weighted average undercutting margin of Indonesian imports was between 0 % and 5 % during the investigation period, these imports could not have caused the injury suffered by the Union industry as they could not have exerted any price pressure on the Union market.
Učinki dampinškega uvoza
This allegation was not supported by the facts of the investigation.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da glede na ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 66 začasne uredbe, tj. da je bila za uvoz iz Indonezije v obdobju preiskave tehtana povprečna stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen v razponu od 0 % do 5 %, ta uvoz ne bi mogel povzročiti škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, ker ne bi mogel izvajati nobenega cenovnega pritiska na trg Unije.
As outlined in recitals 99 and 100 of the provisional Regulation, dumped imports from Indonesia increased substantially during the period considered, both in absolute terms and in terms of market share.
Te domneve dejstva v preiskavi niso potrdila.
This increase coincided with a decrease in sales volume and market share from the Union industry.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 99 in 100 začasne uredbe se je dampinški uvoz iz Indonezije v obravnavanem obdobju precej povečal, tako v absolutnem smislu kot v smislu tržnega deleža.
The imports in such substantial quantities forced the Union industry to lower its sales prices in order to align them with the price levels of the Indonesian imports.
To povečanje je sovpadalo z zmanjšanjem obsega prodaje in tržnega deleža industrije Unije.
As a consequence the undercutting margins found were indeed low.
Uvoz tako velikih količin je industrijo Unije prisilil, da je znižala svoje prodajne cene, da bi jih uskladila z ravnmi cen indonezijskega uvoza.
However, at the same time the Union industry was not able to set their prices in line with the cost increase which lead to a significant decrease of its profitability during the period considered.
Zato so bile ugotovljene stopnje nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen dejansko nizke.
This is confirmed by the magnitude of the injury margins found which range between 24,9 % and 47,0 % as mentioned below in recital 125.
Vendar industrija Unije obenem ni mogla določiti svojih cen skladno s povečanjem stroškov, kar je povzročilo precejšnje zmanjšanje njene dobičkonosnosti v obravnavanem obdobju.
In the absence of any other comments as regard the effects of the dumped imports, the conclusions set out in recitals 98 to 101 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
To je potrdila velikost ugotovljenih stopenj škode, ki so znašale med 24,9 % in 47,0 %, kot je navedeno v nadaljevanju v uvodni izjavi 125.
Effect of other factors
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb v zvezi z učinki dampinškega uvoza, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 98 do 101 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Effect of imports from China
Učinki drugih dejavnikov
Two interested parties alleged that, contrary to the conclusions reached in recital 103 of the provisional Regulation, Chinese imports had a negative effect on the Union industry's sales prices and contributed therefore to the material injury.
Učinki uvoza iz Kitajske
In absolute terms, the volume of Chinese imports remained at low levels during the period considered as mentioned in recital 102 of the provisional Regulation.
Dve zainteresirani strani sta trdili, da je imel uvoz iz Kitajske – v nasprotju s sklepi iz uvodne izjave 103 začasne uredbe – negativen učinek na prodajne cene industrije Unije in je zato prispeval k znatni škodi.
Furthermore, when taking into consideration the anti-dumping duties, import prices were at higher levels than the Union industry's sales prices and also higher than the Indonesian import prices.
V absolutnem smislu je obseg uvoza iz Kitajske v obravnavanem obdobju ostal na nizki ravni, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 102 začasne uredbe.
The allegation that Chinese imports contributed to the material injury suffered by the Union industry was, in view of the import volumes and import prices levels from China, rejected.
Poleg tega so bile ob upoštevanju protidampinških dajatev uvozne cene na višji ravni kot prodajne cene industrije Unije, pa tudi višje od indonezijskih uvoznih cen.
The conclusions reached in recitals 102 and 103 of the provisional Regulation were therefore confirmed.
Domneva, da je uvoz iz Kitajske prispeval k znatni škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, je bila glede na obseg uvoza in raven kitajskih uvoznih cen zavrnjena.
Imports from other third countries
Sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 102 in 103 začasne uredbe se zato potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments with regard to the effect of imports from other third countries, the conclusions reached in recitals 104 to 108 of the provisional Regulation were confirmed.
Uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav
Development of Union consumption
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb v zvezi z učinkom uvoza iz drugih tretjih držav, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 104 do 108 začasne uredbe potrdijo.