natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The documents referred to in Article 194(3) and (4) of the Rules of Procedure must, where applicable, be produced together with the response.
Predlog mora biti sam po sebi razumljiv, ne da bi bilo treba vpogledati v pritožbo ali odgovor na pritožbo.
Point 129 above shall apply to responses lodged in appeal cases.
Zaradi posebnosti pritožbenega postopka, ki je omejen na preizkus pravnih vprašanj, lahko predsednik, če predlogu za repliko ugodi, omeji predmet in število strani te vloge ter predmet in število strani duplike, ki ji sledi.
If, when the appeal has been served on him, one of the parties to the relevant case before the Civil Service Tribunal intends to challenge the Civil Service Tribunal's decision on an aspect not mentioned in the appeal, that party must bring a cross-appeal against the Civil Service Tribunal's decision.
Upoštevanje teh navodil je bistveno za nemoten potek postopka.
That cross-appeal must be introduced by a separate document and meet the requirements set out in Articles 203 and 204 of the Rules of Procedure.
Kot izhaja iz člena 106 Poslovnika, Splošno sodišče opravi obravnavo po uradni dolžnosti ali na predlog glavne stranke.
The pleas in law and legal arguments which it contains must be separate from those relied on in the response.
Glavna stranka, ki želi ustno podati navedbe na obravnavi, mora v treh tednih od vročitve obvestila o koncu pisnega dela postopka strankam podati obrazložen predlog v tem smislu.
Where such a cross-appeal is brought, the appellant, or any other party to the relevant case before the Civil Service Tribunal having an interest in the cross-appeal being allowed or dismissed, may submit a response, which must be limited to the pleas in law relied on in that cross-appeal.
Ta obrazložitev – ki se ne sme zamenjati z vlogo ali pisnimi stališči in ki naj ne bi bila daljša od treh strani – mora izhajati iz konkretne presoje koristnosti obravnave za zadevno stranko, v njej pa je treba navesti elemente v spisu v zadevi ali utemeljitev, za katere ta stranka meni, da jih je treba razviti ali na obravnavi dodatno izpodbijati.
Whether in the case of a main appeal or a cross-appeal, the appeal and the response may be supplemented by a reply and a rejoinder, in particular in order to allow the parties to present their views on a plea of inadmissibility or on new matters relied on in the response.
Za boljše usmerjanje razprav med obravnavo, se priporoča, da obrazložitev ni splošna, ki bi se na primer sklicevala le na pomembnost zadeve.
In accordance with Article 201(1) and Article 206(1) of the Rules of Procedure, that possibility is subject to the express authorisation of the President on application by the appellant or the party who brought the cross-appeal.
Če glavna stranka obrazloženega predloga ne poda v določenem roku, lahko Splošno sodišče odloči, da bo o tožbi odločilo brez ustnega dela postopka.
Save in exceptional circumstances, such an application must not exceed 2 pages and must be confined to summarising the precise reasons for which a reply is necessary.
Kot izhaja iz člena 12(2) Priloge I k Statutu in člena 207(1) Poslovnika, mora stranka v pritožbenem postopku, ki želi ustno podati navedbe na obravnavi, v treh tednih od vročitve obvestila o koncu pisnega dela postopka strankam podati obrazložen predlog v tem smislu.
The request must be intelligible in itself, without necessitating reference to the appeal or to the response.
Vendar lahko Splošno sodišče, če meni, da je na podlagi listin v spisu v zadevi dejansko stanje dovolj razjasnjeno, odloči, da bo o pritožbi odločilo brez ustnega dela postopka.
Due to the special nature of appeals, which are restricted to the examination of questions of law, the President may, if he grants the application to lodge a reply, limit the number of pages and the subject-matter of that reply and of the rejoinder submitted subsequently.
V pritožbenih zadevah Splošnemu sodišču namreč ni treba opraviti obravnave, čeprav je stranka v pritožbenem postopku podala obrazložen predlog.
The observance of those instructions is an essential condition for the efficient conduct of the proceedings.
Sodno tajništvo vsaj en mesec pred obravnavo pošlje strankam vabilo na obravnavo, brez poseganja v primere, v katerih okoliščine upravičujejo, da se jih povabi v krajšem roku.
As is apparent from Article 106 of the Rules of Procedure, the Court shall arrange a hearing either of its own motion or at the request of a main party.
V skladu s členom 107(2) Poslovnika se predlogom za preložitev datuma obravnave ugodi zgolj v izrednih okoliščinah.
A main party who wishes to present oral argument must submit a reasoned request for a hearing, within three weeks after service on the parties of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure.
Take predloge lahko vložijo le glavne stranke in morajo biti ustrezno obrazloženi, priložiti jim je treba ustrezna dokazila in jih predložiti Splošnemu sodišču čim prej po prejemu vabila.
That reasoning — which is not to be confused with written pleadings or observations and should not exceed three pages — must be based on a real assessment of the benefit of a hearing to the party in question and must indicate the elements of the case-file or arguments which that party considers it necessary to develop or refute more fully at a hearing.
Če se zastopnik stranke ne namerava udeležiti obravnave, mora o tem čim prej po prejemu vabila obvestiti Splošno sodišče.
In order better to ensure that the arguments remain focused at the hearing, the statement of reasons should preferably not be in general terms merely referring, for example, to the importance of the case.
Splošno sodišče si prizadeva, da pošlje skrajšano poročilo za obravnavo zastopnikom strank tri tedne pred obravnavo.
If no reasoned request is submitted by a main party within the prescribed time limit, the Court may decide to rule on the action without an oral part of the procedure.
Namen skrajšanega poročila za obravnavo je priprava obravnave.
As is apparent from Article 12(2) of Annex I to the Statute and Article 207(1) of the Rules of Procedure, a party to the appeal proceedings who wishes to present oral argument must submit a reasoned request for a hearing, within three weeks after service on the parties of notification of the close of the written part of the procedure.
Skrajšano poročilo za obravnavo, ki ga pripravi sodnik poročevalec, vsebuje le tožbene razloge in jedrnat povzetek trditev strank.
However, the Court may, if it considers that it has sufficient information available to it from the material in the file, decide to rule on the appeal without an oral part of the procedure.
Morebitna stališča strank glede skrajšanega poročila za obravnavo se lahko predložijo med obravnavo.
In appeal cases, the Court may proceed without arranging a hearing notwithstanding the submission of a reasoned request by a party to the appeal proceedings.
V tem primeru se ta stališča zabeležijo v zapisnik o obravnavi.
The parties shall be given notice to attend the hearing by the Registry at least one month before it takes place, provided always that, where the circumstances so require, a shorter period of notice may apply.
Skrajšano poročilo za obravnavo ima javnost na voljo pred razpravno dvorano na dan obravnave, razen če je javnost izključena iz obravnave.
In accordance with Article 107(2) of the Rules of Procedure, requests for an adjournment of the hearing shall be granted only in exceptional circumstances.
Sodni tajnik objavi pred vsako javno obravnavo v jeziku postopka te informacije: dan in uro obravnave, pristojno sestavo, zadevo ali zadeve, ki se bodo obravnavale, in imena strank.
Such requests may be lodged only by the main parties, must state adequate reasons, be accompanied by appropriate supporting documents, and be submitted to the Court as soon as possible after notice to attend has been given.
Prošnjo za uporabo nekaterih tehničnih sredstev pri predstavitvi je treba podati vsaj dva tedna pred dnevom obravnave.
If the representative of a party intends not to be present at the hearing, he is requested to inform the Court as soon as possible after notice to attend has been given.
Sodno tajništvo določi podrobna pravila o uporabi teh sredstev ob upoštevanju morebitnih tehničnih ali praktičnih omejitev.
The Court will make every effort to ensure that the parties' representatives receive a summary report for the hearing three weeks before the hearing.
Nosilci teh predstavitev se ne vložijo v spis v zadevi, razen če predsednik ne odloči drugače.
The purpose of the summary report for the hearing is to enable the parties to prepare for the hearing.
Upoštevajoč varnostne ukrepe, ki veljajo za vstop v stavbe Sodišča Evropske unije, se zastopnikom strank priporoča, da so v razpravni dvorani navzoči vsaj 15 minut pred začetkom obravnave, saj je običajno, da se člani sestave z njimi pogovorijo o izvedbi obravnave.
The summary report for the hearing, drawn up by the Judge-Rapporteur, shall be confined to setting out the pleas in law and a succinct summary of the parties' arguments.
Za pripravo udeležbe na obravnavi se zastopnikom strank priporoča ogled dokumenta „Pregledni seznam – Obravnava“, ki je na voljo na spletnem mestu Sodišča Evropske unije.
Any observations the parties may wish to make on the summary report for the hearing may be made at the hearing.
Zastopniki strank morajo nositi togo.
In such cases, a reference to such observations shall be recorded in the minutes of the hearing.
Obravnavo sestavljajo:
The summary report for the hearing shall be made available to the public outside the courtroom on the day of the hearing, unless the case is to be heard in camera.
po potrebi zelo strnjena ponovitev stališč, tako da se poudarijo bistveni razlogi, navedeni pisno,
Before every public hearing the Registrar shall cause the following information to be displayed outside the courtroom in the language of the case: the date and time of the hearing, the competent formation of the Court, the case(s) which will be called and the names of the parties.
po potrebi pojasnitev nekaterih trditev, navedenih v pisnem delu postopka, in predstavitev morebitnih novih trditev, ki izhajajo iz dogodkov, ki so se zgodili po koncu pisnega dela postopka in ki jih zato ni bilo mogoče navesti v pisnih navedbah,
A request to use particular technical means for the purposes of a presentation must be made at least two weeks before the date of the hearing.
odgovori na morebitna vprašanja Splošnega sodišča.
Arrangements for such use of technology should be made with the Registry, so that any technical or practical constraints can be taken into account.
Vsaka stranka mora ob upoštevanju namena obravnave, kot je bil opredeljen v točki 196 zgoraj, presoditi, ali so ustne navedbe resnično koristne oziroma ali bi zadostovalo zgolj sklicevanje na pisna stališča ali vloge.
Supporting material for such presentations shall not be placed on the case-file, unless the President otherwise decides.
Obravnava se torej lahko osredotoči na odgovore na vprašanja Splošnega sodišča.
In view of the security measures in place to control access to the buildings of the Court of Justice of the European Union, it is recommended that the parties' representatives take the necessary steps to ensure that they are present in the courtroom at least 15 minutes before the hearing is due to start, as the members of the formation of the Court will normally wish to discuss the organisation of the hearing with them.
Če zastopnik meni, da mora prevzeti besedo, se lahko vedno omeji na predstavitev določenih točk in se glede drugih sklicuje na vloge.
In order to prepare for their participation in a hearing, the parties' representatives are invited to consult the following document, which is available on the internet site of the Court of Justice of the European Union: ‘Aide-mémoire: Hearing of oral argument’.
Če je Splošno sodišče pred izvedbo obravnave v skladu s členom 89(4) Poslovnika stranke pozvalo, naj svoje navedbe osredotočijo na eno ali več določenih vprašanj, je treba ta vprašanja prednostno navesti med podajanjem navedb.
The parties' representatives shall be required to appear before the Court in their gowns.
Če se stranka vzdrži ustnih navedb, njen molk ne pomeni strinjanja z navedbami druge stranke, če so bile zadevne navedbe že izpodbijane pisno.
The purpose of the hearing shall be:
Ta molk tej stranki ne preprečuje, da na ustne navedbe druge stranke poda repliko.
where necessary, to reiterate in condensed form the position taken by the parties, emphasising the key submissions advanced in writing,
Zaradi jasnosti in da bi članom Splošnega sodišča zagotovili boljše razumevanje ustnih navedb, je na splošno bolj priporočljiv prosti govor na podlagi zapiskov kot pa branje besedila.
to clarify, if necessary, certain arguments advanced during the written part of the procedure and to submit any new material arising from events occurring after the close of the written part of the procedure and which therefore could not have been set out in the pleadings,
Prav tako se od zastopnikov strank zahteva, naj čim bolj poenostavijo predstavitev zadeve in raje uporabljajo krajše povedi.
to reply to any questions put by the Court.
Poleg tega bi zastopniki Splošnemu sodišču olajšali delo, če bi navedbe strukturirali in predhodno natančno predstavili, kako jih nameravajo podati.
It will be for each party to assess, in the light of the purpose of the hearing, as defined in point 196 above, whether oral argument is really necessary or whether it would be sufficient simply to refer to the written observations or pleadings.
Trajanje podajanja navedb se lahko razlikuje glede na zapletenost zadeve in obstoj ali neobstoj novih dejstev.
The hearing can then concentrate on the replies to questions put by the Court.
Za podajanje svojih navedb ima vsaka glavna stranka na voljo 15 minut, vsak intervenient pa 10 minut (v združenih zadevah ima vsaka glavna stranka 15 minut za vsako od zadev in vsak intervenient 10 minut za vsako od zadev), razen če jim sodno tajništvo v zvezi s tem ni dalo drugih navodil.
If the representative does consider it necessary to address the Court, he may always confine himself to making specific points and referring to the pleadings in relation to other points.
Ta omejitev velja le za same ustne navedbe in ne vključuje časa, potrebnega za odgovarjanje na vprašanja, postavljena na obravnavi ali za končne replike.
Where, before the hearing, the Court has invited the parties, in accordance with Article 89(4) of the Rules of Procedure, to concentrate in their oral pleadings on one or more specified issues, those issues must be addressed as a matter of priority in the oral submissions.
Če je zaradi okoliščin to potrebno, se lahko na sodno tajništvo vsaj dva tedna (oziroma v izjemnih, ustrezno obrazloženih okoliščinah tudi pozneje) pred datumom obravnave naslovi predlog za odobritev izjeme od tega običajnega trajanja, ki ga je treba ustrezno obrazložiti in ob tem natančno navesti čas podajanja ustnih navedb, ki naj bi bil za to potreben.
If a party refrains from presenting oral argument, this shall not constitute acquiescence in the oral argument presented by another party where the arguments in question have already been refuted in writing.
Zastopnike se obvesti o času trajanja ustnih navedb, ki ga bodo imeli na voljo na podlagi teh predlogov.
Such silence shall not preclude that party from responding to the other party's submission.
Kadar eno stranko zastopa več zastopnikov, lahko ustne navedbe načeloma predstavita le dva izmed njih, celotna dolžina podajanja ustnih navedb pa ne sme prekoračiti časa, navedenega v točki 201 zgoraj.
In the interests of clarity and in order to enable the Members of the Court to understand oral submissions better, it will generally be preferable for Counsel to speak freely on the basis of notes rather than to read out a written text.
Vendar lahko odgovore na vprašanja sodnikov in končne replike dajejo tudi zastopniki, ki niso predstavili ustnih navedb.
The parties' representatives are also requested to simplify their presentation of the case as far as possible and to use short sentences.
Kadar več strank zagovarja enako stališče pred Splošnim sodiščem (zlasti pri intervencijah ali združenih zadevah), se lahko njihovi zastopniki pred obravnavo posvetujejo, da bi se izognili kakršnemu koli ponavljanju navedb.
It would also assist the Court if representatives could structure their oral argument and indicate, before developing it, the structure they intend to adopt.
Zastopnike se naproša, naj pri sklicevanju na odločbo Sodišča, Splošnega sodišča ali Sodišča za uslužbence navedejo poimenovanje, uporabljeno za to odločbo, opravilno številko zadeve in po potrebi upoštevno točko ali točke.
The time taken in presenting oral submissions may vary, depending on the complexity of the case and on whether or not new facts have arisen.
V skladu s členom 85(3) Poslovnika lahko glavne stranke izjemoma predložijo dokaze še med obravnavo.
Each of the main parties will be allowed 15 minutes and each intervener will be allowed 10 minutes to present oral submissions (in joined cases, each of the main parties will be allowed 15 minutes for each case and each intervener will be allowed 10 minutes for each case), unless the Registry has indicated otherwise.
V tem primeru se druge stranke izrečejo o njihovi dopustnosti in vsebini.
These limitations shall apply only to the oral submissions themselves and not to the time required to answer questions put at the hearing or for final replies.
Svetuje se, da se po potrebi zagotovi zadosti izvodov.
If circumstances so require, a request for leave to exceed the speaking time normally allowed, giving reasons and indicating the speaking time considered necessary, may be made to the Registry at least two weeks (or less, in duly substantiated exceptional circumstances) before the date fixed for the hearing.
Da bi se olajšalo tolmačenje, se zastopnikom strank predlaga, naj morebitno besedilo ali pisno podlago za svoje ustne navedbe predhodno posredujejo službi za tolmačenje po elektronski pošti (interpret@curia.europa.eu).
When such requests are made, representatives will be informed of the time which they will have for presenting their oral submissions.
Zaupnost posredovanih besedil ustnih navedb je zagotovljena.
When several representatives act for a party, only two of them may normally present oral argument, and their combined speaking time must not exceed the time limits indicated in point 201 above.
Da bi se izognili morebitnim nesporazumom, je treba navesti ime stranke.
However, representatives other than those who addressed the Court may answer questions from Members of the Court and make final replies.
Besedila ustnih navedb se ne vložijo v spis v zadevi.
Where two or more parties are advancing the same argument before the Court (a situation which may arise where, in particular, there are interventions or where cases are joined), their representatives are requested to confer with each other before the hearing in order to avoid any repetition.
Zastopnike se opozarja, da, odvisno od primera, le nekateri člani Splošnega sodišča spremljajo ustne navedbe v jeziku, v katerem se podajajo, in da preostali poslušajo simultano tolmačenje.
When citing a decision of the Court of Justice, the General Court or the Civil Service Tribunal, representatives are requested to refer to it by the usual name of the case and the case number, and, where relevant, to specify the relevant paragraph(s).
Zastopnikom se za boljši potek obravnave in ohranjanje ravni kakovosti simultanega tolmačenja priporoča, naj govorijo počasi in v mikrofon.
In accordance with Article 85(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the main parties may, exceptionally, produce further evidence at the hearing.
Če nameravajo zastopniki dobesedno navajati odlomke nekaterih besedil ali dokumentov, zlasti odstavkov, ki niso navedeni v spisu v zadevi, je priporočljivo, da se to tolmačem sporoči pred obravnavo.
In such cases, the other parties will be heard on the admissibility and content thereof.
Prav tako jih je smiselno opozoriti na morebiti težko prevedljive izraze.
It would be prudent to bring sufficient copies where appropriate.
Sodni tajnik sestavi zapisnik o vsaki obravnavi v jeziku postopka, ki vsebuje: navedbo zadeve; dan, uro in kraj obravnave; po potrebi navedbo o tem, da gre za obravnavo, iz katere je javnost izključena; imena navzočih sodnikov in sodnega tajnika; imena in status navzočih zastopnikov strank; po potrebi navedbo stališč glede skrajšanega poročila za obravnavo; po potrebi priimke, imena, status in prebivališče zaslišanih prič ali izvedencev; navedbo procesnih aktov ali dokazil, predloženih na obravnavi, in kadar je to potrebno, izjave, podane na obravnavi, in odločitve, ki jih je na obravnavi razglasilo Splošno sodišče ali predsednik.
In order to facilitate interpretation, parties' representatives are requested to send any text or written notes for their submissions to the Interpretation Directorate in advance by e-mail (interpret@curia.europa.eu).
V skladu s členom 64 in ob upoštevanju členov 68(4), 104, 105(8) in 144(7) Poslovnika Splošno sodišče upošteva le procesne akte in dokazila, s katerimi so se zastopniki strank lahko seznanili in glede katerih so se lahko izrekli.
Any notes for submissions thus transmitted will be treated in the strictest confidence.
Iz tega izhaja, da brez poseganja v člene od 103 do 105 Poslovnika predloga za zaupno obravnavanje nekaterih podatkov v spisu v zadevi, ki ga tožeča stranka vloži glede tožene stranke, ni mogoče upoštevati.
In order to avoid any misunderstanding, the name of the party must be stated.
Tožena stranka prav tako ne more vložiti takega predloga glede tožeče stranke.
Notes for submissions will not be placed on the case-file.
Vendar lahko glavna stranka zahteva, da se določeni podatki iz spisa v zadevi, ki so zaupni, v skladu s členom 144(7) Poslovnika intervenientu ne pošljejo.
Representatives are reminded that, depending on the case being heard, only some of the Members of the bench may be following the oral argument in the language in which it is being presented; the other Members will be listening to the simultaneous interpretation.
Vsaka stranka lahko tudi zahteva, da se določeni podatki iz spisov, na katere se nanaša združitev, v skladu s členom 68(4) Poslovnika izključijo iz vpogleda stranke v združenih zadevah.
In the interests of the better conduct of the hearing and of maintaining the quality of the simultaneous interpretation, representatives are strongly advised to speak slowly and directly into the microphone.
Če je v zadevi podan predlog za intervencijo, se glavne stranke pozove, naj v roku, ki ga določi sodni tajnik, navedejo, ali predlagajo zaupno obravnavanje nekaterih podatkov v procesnih aktih in dokazilih, ki so že bili vloženi v spis v zadevi.
Where representatives intend to cite verbatim passages from certain texts or documents, particularly passages not appearing in the case-file, it would be helpful if they would indicate the passages concerned to the interpreters before the hearing.
Glavne stranke morajo za vse procesne akte in dokazila, ki jih vložijo pozneje, hkrati ob njihovi vložitvi po potrebi podati predlog za zaupno obravnavanje.
Similarly, it may be helpful to draw the interpreters' attention to any terms which may be difficult to translate.
Če tak predlog ne bo podan, bodo vloženi procesni akti in dokazila poslani intervenientu.
The Registrar shall draw up in the respective language of each case the minutes of every hearing.
Vsak predlog za zaupno obravnavanje je treba vložiti z ločeno vlogo.