natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This should prevent liabilities from being excluded from the basis of calculation of the contributions if there are no guarantees that intragroup lending exposures would be covered where the financial health of the group deteriorates.
To bi moralo preprečiti, da bi bile obveznosti izključene iz osnove za izračun prispevkov, če ni jamstev, da bodo izpostavljenosti iz naslova posojil znotraj skupine krite v primeru poslabšanja finančnega položaja skupine.
Moreover, to avoid that the exclusion of intragroup liabilities grants an advantage to group entities which benefit from this exemption, such exclusion should not allow the institutions concerned to benefit from the simplified contribution system granted to small institutions, where, following the exclusion of intragroup liabilities, an institution would qualify for the simplified system.
Poleg tega, da bi se preprečilo, da bi izključitev obveznosti znotraj skupine privedla do prednosti za subjekte v skupini, ki lahko koristijo to izvzetje, taka izključitev zadevnim institucijam ne bi smela dovoliti, da koristijo poenostavljen sistem prispevkov, dovoljen majhnim institucijam, če bi zaradi izključitve obveznosti znotraj skupine institucija izpolnjevala pogoje za poenostavljeni sistem.
By way of derogation from the rule that the calculation of contributions should be performed at individual level, in the case of a central body with credit institutions affiliated to it that are wholly or partially exempted from prudential requirements in national law in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the rules on ex ante contributions should only apply to the central body and the affiliated credit institutions as a whole on a consolidated basis because the solvency and liquidity of the central body and of all the affiliated institutions are monitored as a whole on the basis of consolidated accounts of these institutions.
Z odstopanjem od pravila, da bi bilo treba izračun prispevkov opraviti na ravni posamezne institucije, bi se morala v primeru centralnega organa s povezanimi kreditnimi institucijami, ki so v celoti ali delno izvzete iz bonitetnih zahtev nacionalne zakonodaje v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, pravila o predhodnih prispevkih uporabljati samo za centralni organ in povezane kreditne institucije kot celoto na konsolidirani podlagi, ker se solventnost in likvidnost centralnega organa in vseh povezanih institucij spremljajo kot celota na podlagi konsolidiranih računovodskih izkazov navedenih institucij.
The determination of the basic annual contribution should also be further specified in case of financial market infrastructures (FMIs).
Določitev osnovnega letnega prispevka bi bilo treba dodatno opredeliti tudi v primeru infrastruktur finančnega trga.
Some FMIs such as central counterparties (CCPs) or central securities depositories (CSDs) are also authorized as credit institutions.
Nekatere infrastrukture finančnega trga, kot so centralne nasprotne stranke in centralne depotne družbe, imajo prav tako dovoljenje za opravljanje dejavnosti kot kreditne institucije.
Notably some CSDs provide banking-type services which are ancillary to their activity as market infrastructures.
Zlasti nekatere centralne depotne družbe opravljajo bančne storitve, ki so pomožne dejavnosti njihovi dejavnosti tržne infrastrukture.
Contrary to credit institutions, CSDs do not hold covered deposits but mostly intraday or overnight balances resulting from the settlement of the securities transactions they provide to financial institutions or central banks.
V nasprotju s kreditnimi institucijami centralne depotne družbe ne držijo kritih vlog, ampak večinoma stanja znotraj enega dne ali stanja čez noč, ki izvirajo iz poravnave transakcij z vrednostnimi papirji, ki jo opravljajo za finančne institucije ali centralne banke.
Generally these do not result in cash balances which could be assimilated to funding raised in order to perform banking activities.
Na splošno ta stanja ne privedejo do stanj denarnih sredstev, ki bi se lahko pretvorila v sredstva za opravljanje bančne dejavnosti.
As the banking-type services performed by FMIs are ancillary to their main activities of clearing or settlement for which those entities are subject to strict prudential requirements under Regulations (EU) No 648/2012 [5] and (EU) No 909/2014 [6] of the European Parliament and of the Council, as well as the relevant provisions under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and Directive 2013/36/EU, and as the business model of the FMIs does not entail risks comparable to those of a credit institution, only the liabilities related to the banking-type activities of those entities should be taken into account when determining the amount of their total liabilities for the purpose of calculating their basic annual contribution.
Ker so bančne storitve, ki jih opravljajo infrastrukture finančnega trga, pomožna dejavnost njihovim glavnim dejavnostim kliringa ali poravnave, v zvezi s katerimi za navedene subjekte veljajo stroge bonitetne zahteve iz Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 [5] in Uredbe (EU) št. 909/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6] kot tudi ustrezne določbe iz Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 in Direktive 2013/36/EU, in ker poslovni model infrastruktur finančnega trga ne vsebuje tveganj, primerljivih s tveganji kreditne institucije, bi se morale pri določanju zneska njihovih celotnih obveznosti za namene izračuna njihovega osnovnega letnega prispevka upoštevati samo obveznosti, ki se nanašajo na bančne dejavnosti navedenih subjektov.
Accounting of derivatives is not harmonized in the Union with respect to individual accounts and therefore this could have an implication in the amount of liabilities to be considered for the calculation of the contributions of each bank.
Obračunavanje izvedenih finančnih instrumentov v Uniji v zvezi s posamičnimi računovodskimi izkazi ni usklajeno, zato bi to vplivalo na višino obveznosti, ki se upoštevajo za izračun prispevkov posamezne banke.
The leverage ratio methodology referred to in Article 429(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 applies to all banks and ensures that the same derivative contract, and in particular the netting between derivative contracts, will be considered in the same manner irrespective of the accounting framework to which that bank is subject.
Metodologija za količnik finančnega vzvoda iz členov 429(6) in 429(7) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 velja za vse banke in zagotavlja, da se ista pogodba o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih in zlasti pobot pogodb o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih obravnavata na enak način, ne glede na računovodski okvir, ki se uporablja za banko.
Therefore, to ensure a harmonised treatment of derivatives in the determination of the basic annual contribution allowing for the comparability of their valuation between institutions and for a level playing field across the Union, derivatives should be valued in accordance with Article 429(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Da bi se zagotovila usklajena obravnava izvedenih finančnih instrumentov pri določanju osnovnega letnega prispevka, kar bi omogočalo primerljivost njihovega vrednotenja med institucijami in enake konkurenčne pogoje v vsej Uniji, bi bilo izvedene finančne instrumente zato treba vrednotiti v skladu s členoma 429(6) in 429(7) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
However, to ensure the predictability of the valuation of derivatives under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, it should be foreseen that such valuation may not lead to a value which is less than 75 % of the value of the derivatives concerned under the relevant accounting framework.
Vendar, da bi se zagotovila predvidljivost vrednotenja izvedenih finančnih instrumentov v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 575/2013, bi bilo treba določiti, da takšno vrednotenje ne sme privesti do vrednosti, ki je manjša od 75 % vrednosti zadevnih izvedenih finančnih instrumentov v skladu z ustreznim računovodskim okvirom.
Some credit institutions are promotional banks whose purpose is to advance the public policy objectives of a Member State's central or regional government, or local authority predominantly through the provision of promotional loans on a non-competitive, not for profit basis.
Nekatere kreditne ustanove so spodbujevalne banke, katerih namen je pospeševati cilje javne politike enot centralne ali regionalne ravni države članice ali lokalnih organov, pretežno z zagotavljanjem spodbujevalnih kreditov na nekonkurenčni in neprofitni osnovi.
The loans that such institutions grant are directly or indirectly partially guaranteed by the central or regional government or the local authority.
Takšne institucije dajejo kredite, za katere neposredno ali posredno jamči enota centralne ali regionalne ravni države ali lokalni organ.
Promotional loans are granted on a non-competitive, not for profit basis in order to promote public policy objectives of the Union or a Member State's central or regional government.
Spodbujevalni krediti so na voljo po nekonkurenčnih in neprofitnih pogojih, da se spodbudijo cilji javne politike Unije ali enot centralne ali regionalne ravni države članice.
The promotional loans are sometimes extended via another institution as intermediary (pass through loans).
Včasih se spodbujevalni krediti odobrijo prek druge institucije, ki deluje kot posrednica (pretočni krediti (pass through loans)).
In such cases, the intermediary credit institution receives promotional loans from a multilateral development bank or a public sector entity and extends them to other credit institutions which would provide them to the final clients.
V takih primerih posredniška kreditna institucija prejme spodbujevalne kredite od multilateralne razvojne banke ali subjekta javnega sektorja in jih da drugim kreditnim institucijam, ki jih zagotovijo končnim strankam.
As the intermediary credit institutions pass through liquidity of these loans from the originating promotional bank towards a lending institution or another intermediary institution, such liabilities should not be included in the total liabilities to be considered for the purpose of calculating the basic annual contribution.
Ker posredniške kreditne institucije pretočijo likvidnost teh kreditov od spodbujevalne banke, iz katere kredit izvira, do posojilne institucije ali druge posredniške institucije, take obveznosti ne bi smele biti vključene v celotne obveznosti, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri izračunu osnovnega letnega prispevka.
Article 103(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU requires all institutions to contribute to the resolution financing arrangements.
Člen 103(1) Direktive 2014/59/EU od vseh institucij zahteva, da prispevajo v sheme za financiranje reševanja.
However, a proportionate and fair balance needs to be found between the obligation of any institution to contribute to a resolution financing arrangement, and its size, risk profile, the scope and complexity of its activities, its interconnectedness to the other institutions or to the financial system in general, the impact of its failure on the financial markets, on other institutions, on funding conditions, or on the wider economy, and therefore the probability that an institution enters into resolution and makes use of the financing arrangement.
Vendar pa je treba najti sorazmerno in pravično ravnotežje med obveznostjo vsake institucije, da prispeva v shemo za financiranje reševanja, ter njeno velikostjo, profilom tveganja, obsegom in kompleksnostjo njenih dejavnosti, njeno medsebojno povezanostjo z drugimi institucijami ali s finančnim sistemom na splošno, vplivom njenega propada na finančne trge, na druge institucije, na pogoje financiranja ali na širše gospodarstvo in s tem verjetnostjo, da bo institucija vstopila v postopek reševanja in koristila shemo za financiranje.
Such elements are taken into account by the resolution authorities, pursuant to Article 4 of Directive 2014/59/EU, when deciding whether certain institutions should benefit from simplified obligations as regards the requirements to prepare recovery and resolution plans.
Take elemente organi za reševanje upoštevajo v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 2014/59/EU pri odločanju, ali so lahko nekatere institucije upravičene do poenostavljenih obveznosti v zvezi z zahtevami glede priprave načrtov za sanacijo in reševanje.
Also, the administrative burden deriving for certain institutions and resolution authorities from the calculation of the annual contributions should be taken into account when assessing the right balance between complying with the requirements set out in Directive 2014/59/EU and the specificities of the various institutions subject to that Directive.
Poleg tega bi se morala upravna obremenitev za nekatere institucije in organe za reševanje, ki je posledica izračunavanja letnih prispevkov, upoštevati pri določanju pravega ravnotežja med izpolnjevanjem zahtev iz Direktive 2014/59/EU in značilnostmi različnih institucij, za katere se uporablja navedena direktiva.
Small institutions do not generally have a high risk profile, are often less systemically risky compared to large institutions, and, in many cases, the impact of their failure on the wider economy is lower than that of large institutions.
Majhne institucije običajno nimajo zelo tveganega profila in so sistemsko pogosto manj tvegane kot velike institucije, poleg tega je učinek njihovega propada na gospodarstvo kot celoto ponavadi manjši kot pri velikih institucijah.
At the same time, the potential impact of the failure of small institutions on the financial stability cannot be ruled out as even small institutions can create systemic risk because of their role in the wider banking system, the cumulative effects of their networks, or the contagion effect that they might create through the loss of confidence in the banking system.
Kljub temu ni mogoče izključiti možnega učinka propada majhnih institucij na finančno stabilnost, saj lahko tudi majhne institucije ustvarijo sistemsko tveganje zaradi svoje vloge v širšem bančnem sistemu, kumulativnih učinkov mrež ali negativnih vplivov, ki jih lahko povzročijo zaradi izgube zaupanja v bančni sistem.
Considering that in most cases small institutions do not pose systemic risk and are less likely to be placed under resolution, which consequently decreases the likelihood that they benefit from the resolution financing arrangements, compared to large institutions, the methodology for calculating their annual contributions to the resolution financing arrangements should be simplified.
Glede na to, da majhne institucije v večini primerov ne predstavljajo sistemskega tveganja in je manj verjetno, da bo potrebno njihovo reševanje, kar posledično v primerjavi z velikimi institucijami zmanjšuje verjetnost, da bodo upravičene do shem za financiranje reševanja, bi bilo treba poenostaviti metodologijo za izračun letnih prispevkov majhnih institucij v sheme za financiranje reševanja.
The annual contributions of small institutions should consist of a lump-sum based only on their basic annual contribution, proportioned to their size.
Letni prispevki majhnih institucij bi morali biti pavšalni zneski, določeni na podlagi njihovega osnovnega letnega prispevka sorazmerno glede na velikost institucije.
Such a methodology should allow for a proportionate system of annual contributions as, in determining the annual contribution of each institution, the resolution authority has to comply with an annual target level of the financing arrangement.
Taka metodologija bi morala omogočati sorazmeren sistem letnih prispevkov, saj mora organ za reševanje določiti letni prispevek posamezne institucije v skladu z letno ciljno ravnijo sheme financiranja.
Therefore, a lump-sum reflects the fact that, in many cases, small institutions are less risky and allows for a wider adjustment of the contribution of larger institutions, which are generally more systemic, in proportion to their risk profile.
Pavšalni znesek tako odraža dejstvo, da so majhne institucije pogosto manj tvegane, in omogoča obsežnejše prilagajanje prispevka večjih institucij, ki so praviloma bolj sistemske, sorazmerno glede na njihov profil tveganja.
A distinction should be made within the category of small institutions as some are very small, while others are close to the maximum thresholds allowing them to benefit from the simplified system.
Hkrati bi bilo treba preprečiti, da bi poenostavljeni sistem povzročil nesorazmerne razlike v letnih prispevkih med največjimi izmed majhnih institucij ter institucijami, ki niso upravičene do poenostavljenega sistema, ker za malenkost presegajo prag.
Under a single lump-sum system, the annual contributions of very small institutions would be disproportionately higher than those of the small institutions which are close to reaching the maximum thresholds.
Da se preprečijo takšni neželeni učinki, je zato primerno, da se predvidi sistem, v katerem se ločuje med več kategorijami majhnih institucij, ki bi kot letni prispevek plačevale različne pavšalne zneske.
At the same time, it should be avoided that the simplified system leads to a disproportionate difference in terms of annual contributions between the biggest among small institutions and the institutions which do not qualify for the simplified system as they are just above the thresholds.
To bi moralo omogočati progresivnost prispevkov znotraj poenostavljenega sistema ter med najvišjim in najnižjim pavšalnim zneskom v skladu z metodo, s katero bi se osnovni letni prispevek prilagajal glede na profil tveganja institucije.
To avoid such unwanted effects it is therefore appropriate to foresee a system of several categories of small institutions whose annual contributions should consist of different lump sum amounts.
Če organ za reševanje določi, da je majhna institucija zelo tvegana, bi moral imeti organ za reševanje zmožnost odločanja o tem, da zadevna institucija ni več upravičena do poenostavljenega sistema in da je treba njen prispevek namesto tega izračunati po metodi, s katero se osnovni letni prispevek prilagodi glede na druge dejavnike tveganja in ne na podlagi velikosti institucije.
This should allow for a progression of contributions within the simplified system, and between the highest lump sum and the lowest contribution pursuant to the method whereby the basic annual contribution is adjusted according to the risk profile of the institution.
Institucije iz člena 45(3) Direktive 2014/59/EU ne bodo dokapitalizirane z uporabo shem za financiranje reševanja v skladu s členoma 44 in 101 Direktive 2014/59/EU, ker bodo prenehale po nacionalnih insolvenčnih postopkih ali drugih vrstah postopkov, izvedenih v skladu s členom 38, 40 ali 42 Direktive 2014/59/EU, ter bodo prenehale opravljati svoje dejavnosti.
Where the resolution authority determines that a small institution has a particularly high risk profile, the resolution authority should have the ability to decide that the institution concerned should no longer benefit from the simplified system, but its contribution should instead be calculated pursuant to the method whereby the basic annual contribution is adjusted according to risk factors other than the institution's size.
Ti postopki zagotavljajo, da bodo upniki teh institucij, vključno z imetniki kritih obveznic, kjer je ustrezno, prevzeli izgube na način, ki ustreza ciljem reševanja.
Institutions referred to in Article 45(3) of Directive 2014/59/EU will not be recapitalized through the use of the resolution financing arrangements in accordance with Articles 44 and 101 of Directive 2014/59/EU because they will be wound-up through national insolvency procedures, or other types of procedure implemented in accordance with Article 38, 40 or 42 of Directive 2014/59/EU and will cease their activities.
Zato bi morali njihovi prispevki v sheme za financiranje reševanja odražati navedene dejavnike.
These procedures ensure that creditors of those institutions, including holders of covered bonds where relevant, will bear the losses in a way that meets the resolution objectives.
Vendar bi se sheme za financiranje reševanja lahko uporabljale za druge namene iz člena 101 Direktive 2014/59/EU.
Therefore, their contributions to the resolution financing arrangements should reflect these specificities.
Če katera koli od takšnih institucij uporabi shemo za financiranje reševanja za enega od navedenih namenov, bi moral biti organ za reševanje zmožen primerjati profil tveganja vseh drugih institucij, zajetih v členu 45(3) Direktive 2014/59/EU, s profilom tveganja institucije, ki je uporabila shemo za financiranje reševanja, ter uporabiti metodologijo, določeno v tem delegiranem aktu, za tiste institucije, ki imajo podoben profil tveganja ali so bolj tvegane od institucij, ki so uporabile shemo za financiranje reševanja.
The resolution financing arrangements could, however, be used for the other purposes referred to in Article 101 of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Prav tako je primerno, da se določi seznam elementov, ki bi jih moral organ za reševanje upoštevati pri primerjanju profilov tveganja.
In case any such institution uses the resolution financing arrangement for any of such purposes, the resolution authority should be able to compare the risk profile of all other institutions covered by Article 45(3) of Directive 2014/59/EU with that of the institution which used the resolution financing arrangement and apply the methodology set out this Delegated Act to those institutions which present a risk profile similar or higher than that of the institutions which used the resolution financing arrangement.
Da se organom držav članic za reševanje omogoči enotna razlaga meril iz člena 103(7) Direktive 2014/59/EU, tako da bo kazalnik tveganja institucij za namene izračuna posameznih prispevkov v sheme za financiranje reševanja določen na podoben način po celotni Uniji, bi bilo treba določiti več stebrov tveganja in ustrezne kazalnike tveganja za vsakega od stebrov tveganja, ki bi jih organi za reševanje morali upoštevati pri oceni profila tveganja institucij.
It is also appropriate to establish a list of elements that the resolution authority should take into account when carrying out the comparison of risk profiles.
Da se zagotovi skladnost z nadzornimi praksami, bi morali biti kazalniki tveganja sestavljeni iz sedanjih regulativnih meril, ki so že na voljo ali se trenutno uvajajo.
In order to enable the resolution authorities of the Member States to have a harmonised interpretation of the criteria set out in Article 103(7) of Directive 2014/59/EU so that the determination of the risk indicator of institutions for the purpose of calculating the individual contributions to the resolution financing arrangements is carried out in a similar manner across the Union, a number of risk pillars, and corresponding risk indicators for each of those risk pillars, should be provided for, to be taken into account by the resolution authorities when assessing the risk profile of institutions.
Če zadevna zakonodaja predvideva opustitve, s katerimi so institucije izvzete iz določanja nekaterih kazalnikov tveganja na ravni institucije, ter pod pogojem, da pristojni organi po potrebi dovolijo uporabo takih opustitev, bi morali organi za reševanje oceniti zadevne kazalnike na konsolidirani ali podkonsolidirani ravni, kakor je ustrezno, da se zagotovi skladnost z nadzorno prakso ter da skupine, ki uporabljajo navedene opustitve, ne bi bile neupravičeno kaznovane.
To ensure consistency with the supervisory practices, the risk indicators should consist of current regulatory benchmarks already available or in the course of being established.
Da se organom za reševanje omogoči usklajen pristop glede pomembnosti stebrov in kazalnikov tveganja, ki bi jih morali upoštevati pri določanju profila tveganja institucij, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti tudi relativno utež vsakega posameznega stebra in kazalnika tveganja.