natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A court settlement approved by or concluded before a court or tribunal in the course of the European Small Claims Procedure and that is enforceable in the Member State in which the procedure was conducted shall be recognised and enforced in another Member State under the same conditions as a judgment given in the European Small Claims Procedure.
Sodna poravnava, ki jo potrdi sodišče ali je sklenjena pred sodiščem med evropskim postopkom v sporih majhne vrednosti in je izvršljiva v državi članici, v kateri je tekel postopek, se prizna in izvrši v drugi državi članici pod enakimi pogoji kot sodba, izdana v evropskem postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti.
The provisions of Chapter III shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to court settlements.’.
Za sodne poravnave se smiselno uporabljajo določbe poglavja III.“;
By 13 January 2017, the Member States shall communicate to the Commission:
Države članice Komisiji do 13. januarja 2017 sporočijo:
the courts or tribunals competent to give a judgment in the European Small Claims Procedure;
sodišča, ki so pristojna za izdajanje sodb v evropskem postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti;
the means of communication accepted for the purposes of the European Small Claims Procedure and available to the courts or tribunals in accordance with Article 4(1);
načine sporočanja, ki so sprejemljivi za namene evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti in dostopni sodiščem v skladu s členom 4(1);
the authorities or organisations competent to provide practical assistance in accordance with Article 11;
organe ali organizacije, ki so pristojni za zagotavljanje praktične pomoči v skladu s členom 11;
the means of electronic service and communication technically available and admissible under their procedural rules in accordance with Article 13(1), (2) and (3), and the means, if any, for expressing acceptance in advance of the use of electronic means as required by Article 13(1) and (2) available under their national law;
načine elektronskega vročanja in sporočanja, ki so na podlagi njihovih procesnih pravil tehnično razpoložljivi in dopustni v skladu s členom 13(1), (2) in (3) ter morebitne načine za izražanje v členu 13(1) in (2) zahtevanega vnaprejšnjega strinjanja z uporabo elektronske oblike vročanja, ki so na voljo po njihovem nacionalnem pravu;
the persons or types of professions, if any, under a legal obligation to accept service of documents or other written communications by electronic means in accordance with Article 13(1) and (2);
osebe ali morebitne vrste poklicev, za katere velja pravna obveznost, da sprejmejo vročitev listin ali drugega pisnega sporočanja v elektronski obliki v skladu s členom 13(1) in (2);
the court fees of the European Small Claims Procedure or how they are calculated, as well as the methods of payment accepted for the payment of court fees in accordance with Article 15a;
sodne takse za evropski postopek v sporih majhne vrednosti ali metode njihovega izračuna ter načine plačila, ki so sprejemljivi za plačilo sodnih taks v skladu s členom 15a;
any appeal available under their procedural law in accordance with Article 17, the time period within which such an appeal is to be lodged, and the court or tribunal with which such an appeal may be lodged;
vsa pravna sredstva, ki so po njihovem procesnem pravu dopustna v skladu s členom 17, rok v katerem se morajo takšna pravna sredstva vložiti ter pri katerem sodišču se lahko takšna pravna sredstva vložijo;
the procedures for applying for a review as provided for in Article 18 and the competent courts or tribunals for such a review;
postopke za vložitev zahtevka za preskus iz člena 18 in sodišča, ki so pristojna za takšen preskus;
the languages they accept pursuant to Article 21a(1); and
jezike, ki so zanje sprejemljivi v skladu s členom 21a(1) ter
the authorities competent with respect to enforcement and the authorities competent for the purposes of the application of Article 23.
organe, ki so pristojni za izvršbo, in organe, ki so pristojni na področju uporabe člena 23.
Member States shall inform the Commission of any subsequent changes to that information.
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo o vseh naknadnih spremembah teh informacij.
The Commission shall make the information communicated in accordance with paragraph 1 publicly available by any appropriate means, such as the European e-Justice Portal.’.
Komisija objavi informacije, sporočene v skladu z odstavkom 1, na kakršen koli primeren način, na primer na evropskem portalu e-pravosodje.“;
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 27 concerning the amendment of Annexes I to IV.’.
Komisija je pooblaščena za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 27 v zvezi s spremembami prilog I do IV.“;
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 26 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from 13 January 2016.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 26 se prenese na Komisijo za nedoločen čas od 13. januarja 2016.
The delegation of power referred to in Article 26 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Prenos pooblastila iz člena 26 lahko kadar koli prekliče Evropski parlament ali Svet.
A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 26 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object.
Delegirani akt, sprejet na podlagi člena 26, začne veljati le, če mu niti Evropski parlament niti Svet ne nasprotuje v roku dveh mesecev od uradnega obvestila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o tem aktu ali če pred iztekom tega roka tako Evropski parlament kot Svet obvestita Komisijo, da mu ne bosta nasprotovala.
By 15 July 2022, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the operation of this Regulation, including an evaluation as to whether:
Komisija do 15. julija 2022 Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru predloži poročilo o delovanju te uredbe, vključno z oceno ali:
a further increase of the limit referred to in Article 2(1) is appropriate in order to attain the objective of this Regulation of facilitating access to justice for citizens and small and medium-sized enterprises in cross-border cases; and
je primerno zvišati zgornje meje iz člena 2(1) zaradi doseganja cilja te Uredbe olajšati dostop do pravnega varstva v čezmejnih zadevah za državljane in mala in srednja podjetja in
an extension of the scope of the European Small Claims Procedure, in particular to claims for remuneration, is appropriate to facilitate access to justice for employees in cross-border employment disputes with their employer, after considering the full impact of such an extension.
je – po preučitvi njenega celotnega učinka – primerna razširitev področja uporabe evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti, zlasti na zahtevke iz naslova plač, da se olajša dostop do pravnega varstva za zaposlene v čezmejnih sporih z njihovim delodajalcem.
That report shall be accompanied, if appropriate, by legislative proposals.
Temu poročilu se, če je primerno, priložijo zakonodajni predlogi.
To that end and by 15 July 2021, Member States shall provide the Commission with information relating to the number of applications under the European Small Claims Procedure as well as the number of requests for enforcement of judgments given in the European Small Claims Procedure.
V ta namen države članice Komisiji do 15. julija 2021 zagotovijo informacije v zvezi s številom vlog v evropskem postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti ter številom zahtevkov za izvršbo sodb, izdanih v evropskem postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti.
By 15 July 2019, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the dissemination of information about the European Small Claims Procedure in the Member States, and may produce recommendations as to how to make that procedure better known.’.
Komisija do 15. julija 2019 Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru predloži poročilo o obveščanju o evropskem postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti v državah članicah ter lahko pripravi priporočila o tem, kako bi lahko ta postopek bil bolj poznan.“
Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1896/2006 se spremeni:
In an Appendix to the application, the claimant may indicate to the court which, if any, of the procedures listed in points (a) and (b) of Article 17(1) he requests to be applied to his claim in the subsequent civil proceedings in the event that the defendant lodges a statement of opposition against the European order for payment.
V dodatku k vlogi lahko tožeča stranka sodišču sporoči svojo zahtevo o tem, kateri, če sploh kateri, od postopkov iz točk (a) in (b) člena 17(1) naj se uporabi za njen zahtevek v nadaljnjih civilnih postopkih, če bi tožena stranka vložila ugovor zoper evropski plačilni nalog.
In the Appendix provided for in the first subparagraph, the claimant may also indicate to the court that he opposes a transfer to civil proceedings within the meaning of point (a) or point (b) of Article 17(1) in the event of opposition by the defendant.
V dodatku iz prvega pododstavka lahko tožeča stranka poleg tega obvesti sodišče, da v primeru ugovora tožene stranke ugovarja prenosu na civilni postopek v smislu točke (a) ali točke (b) člena 17(1).
This does not prevent the claimant from informing the court thereof subsequently, but in any event before the order is issued.’.
Tožeča stranka lahko sodišče o tem obvesti tudi naknadno, v vsakem primeru pa pred izdajo naloga.“;
Effect of the lodging of a statement of opposition
Učinki vložitve ugovora
If a statement of opposition is lodged within the time limit laid down in Article 16(2), the proceedings shall continue before the competent courts of the Member State of origin unless the claimant has explicitly requested that the proceedings be terminated in that event.
Če se ugovor vloži v roku iz člena 16(2), se postopek nadaljuje pred pristojnimi sodišči države članice izvora, razen če je tožeča stranka izrecno zahtevala, da se postopek v tem primeru zaključi.
The proceedings shall continue in accordance with the rules of:
Postopek se nadaljuje v skladu s pravili:
the European Small Claims Procedure laid down in Regulation (EC) No 861/2007, if applicable; or
evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti, določenega v Uredbi (ES) št. 861/2007, če je primerno, ali
any appropriate national civil procedure.
katerega koli ustreznega nacionalnega civilnega postopka.
Where the claimant has not indicated which of the procedures listed in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 he requests to be applied to his claim in the proceedings that ensue in the event of a statement of opposition or where the claimant has requested that the European Small Claims Procedure as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 be applied to a claim that does not fall within the scope of that Regulation, the proceedings shall be transferred to the appropriate national civil procedure, unless the claimant has explicitly requested that such transfer not be made.
Kadar tožeča stranka ne sporoči svoje zahteve o tem, kateri od postopkov iz točk (a) in (b) odstavka 1 naj se uporabi za njen zahtevek v evropskem postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti, do katerega pride v primeru ugovora, ali če zahteva, da se evropski postopek v sporih majhne vrednosti, kot je določen v Uredbi (ES) št. 861/2007, uporabi za zahtevek, ki ne spada na področje uporabe navedene uredbe, se postopek prenese na ustrezni nacionalni civilni postopek, razen če je tožeča stranka izrecno zahtevala, da se takšen prenos ne izvede.
Where the claimant has pursued his claim through the European order for payment procedure, nothing under national law shall prejudice his position in subsequent civil proceedings.
Kadar je tožeča stranka vložila zahtevek s pomočjo postopka za evropski plačilni nalog, ne sme nič v okviru nacionalnega prava posegati v njen položaj v okviru nadaljnjih civilnih postopkov.
The transfer to civil proceedings within the meaning of points (a) and (b) of paragraph 1 shall be governed by the law of the Member State of origin.
Prenos na civilni postopek v smislu točk (a) in (b) odstavka 1 ureja pravo države članice izvora.
The claimant shall be informed of whether the defendant has lodged a statement of opposition and of any transfer to civil proceedings within the meaning of paragraph 1.’.
Tožečo stranko je treba obvestiti, ali je tožena stranka vložila ugovor, ter o vsakem prenosu na civilni postopek v smislu odstavka 1.“;
In Article 25, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
v členu 25 se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Where, in a Member State, the court fees for civil proceedings within the meaning of point (a) or point (b) of Article 17(1), as applicable, are equivalent to or higher than those of the European order for payment procedure, the total of the court fees for a European order for payment procedure and for the civil proceedings that ensue in the event of a statement of opposition in accordance with Article 17(1) shall not exceed the fees for those proceedings without a preceding European order for payment procedure in that Member State.
Kadar so v državi članici sodne takse za civilni postopek v smislu točke (a) oziroma točke (b) člena 17(1) enako visoke ali višje kot sodne takse postopka za evropski plačilni nalog, skupni znesek sodnih taks postopka za evropski plačilni nalog in civilnega postopka, do katerega pride v primeru ugovora v skladu s členom 17(1), ne presega zneska taks za postopke brez predhodnega evropskega postopka za plačilni nalog v tej državi članici.
No additional court fees may be charged in a Member State for the civil proceedings that ensue in the event of a statement of opposition in accordance with point (a) or point (b) of Article 17(1), as applicable, if the court fees for such proceedings in that Member State are lower than those for the European order for payment procedure.’.
V državi članici ni dovoljeno zaračunavati nobenih dodatnih sodnih taks za civilne postopke, do katerih pride v primeru ugovora v skladu s točko (a) oziroma točko (b) člena 17(1), če so v tej državi članici sodne takse za tovrstne postopke nižje od sodnih taks postopka za evropski plačilni nalog.“;
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 31 concerning the amendment of Annexes I to VII.’.
Na Komisijo se prenese pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu s členom 31 v zvezi s spremembami prilog I do VII.“;
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 30 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from 13 January 2016.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 30 se prenese na Komisijo za nedoločen čas od 13. januarja 2016.
The delegation of power referred to in Article 30 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Prenos pooblastila iz člena 30 lahko kadar koli prekliče Evropski parlament ali Svet.
A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 30 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object.
Delegirani akt, sprejet na podlagi člena 30, začne veljati le, če mu niti Evropski parlament niti Svet ne nasprotuje v roku dveh mesecev od uradnega obvestila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o tem aktu ali če pred iztekom tega roka tako Evropski parlament kot Svet obvestita Komisijo, da mu ne bosta nasprotovala.
It shall apply from 14 July 2017 with the exception of point (16) of Article 1, amending Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 861/2007, which shall apply from 14 January 2017.
Uporablja se od 14. julija 2017, razen točke (16) člena 1, ki spreminja člen 25 Uredbe (ES) št. 861/2007, ki se uporablja od 14. januarja 2017.
Done at Strasbourg, 16 December 2015.
V Strasbourgu, 16. decembra 2015
OJ C 226, 16.7.2014, p. 43.
UL C 226, 16.7.2014, str. 43.
Position of the European Parliament of 7 October 2015 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 3 December 2015.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. oktobra 2015 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 3. decembra 2015.
Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p. 1).
Uredba (ES) št. 861/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o uvedbi evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti (UL L 199, 31.7.2007, str. 1).
Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (OJ L 174, 27.6.2001, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1206/2001 z dne 28. maja 2001 o sodelovanju med sodišči držav članic pri pridobivanju dokazov v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah (UL L 174, 27.6.2001, str. 1).
Council Directive 2003/8/EC of 27 January 2003 to improve access to justice in cross-border disputes by establishing minimum common rules relating to legal aid for such disputes (OJ L 26, 31.1.2003, p. 41).
Direktiva Sveta 2003/8/ES z dne 27. januarja 2003 o izboljšanju dostopa do pravnega varstva v čezmejnih sporih z uvedbo minimalnih skupnih pravil v zvezi s pravno pomočjo pri takih sporih (UL L 26, 31.1.2003, str. 41).
Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure (OJ L 399, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
Uredba (ES) št. 1896/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o uvedbi postopka za evropski plačilni nalog (UL L 399, 30.12.2006, str. 1).
Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 351, 20.12.2012, p. 1).’.
Uredba (EU) št. 1215/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2012 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah (UL L 351, 20.12.2012, str. 1).“;
Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Protocol No 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union
o spremembi Protokola št. 3 o Statutu Sodišča Evropske unije
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 254 and the second paragraph of Article 281 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti prvega odstavka člena 254 in drugega odstavka člena 281 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the opinions of the European Commission [1],
ob upoštevanju mnenj Evropske komisije [1],
As a consequence of the progressive expansion of its jurisdiction since its creation, the number of cases before the General Court is now constantly increasing.
Kot posledica postopnega širjenja pristojnosti Splošnega sodišča od njegove ustanovitve se število zadev, predloženih temu sodišču, zdaj stalno veča.
At present, the duration of proceedings does not appear to be acceptable from the point of view of litigants, particularly in the light of the requirements set out in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Trenutno je trajanje postopkov težko sprejemljivo za stranke, zlasti glede na zahteve iz člena 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in člena 6 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin.
The situation in which the General Court finds itself has causes relating, inter alia, to the increase in the number and variety of legal acts of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, as well as to the volume and complexity of the cases brought before the General Court, particularly in the areas of competition, State aid and intellectual property.
Vzroki za položaj, v katerem je Splošno sodišče, so med drugim povezani z večanjem števila in raznolikosti pravnih aktov institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije kot tudi z obsegom in zapletenostjo zadev, predloženih Splošnemu sodišču, zlasti na področjih konkurence, državnih pomoči in intelektualne lastnine.
The option of setting up specialised courts as provided for in Article 257 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) has not been taken up.
Možnost ustanovitve specializiranih sodišč, kakor je določeno v členu 257 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), ni bila uporabljena.
Consequently, suitable measures of an organisational, structural and procedural nature, including, in particular, an increase in the number of Judges, should be taken to address this situation.
Zato bi bilo treba sprejeti ustrezne organizacijske, strukturne in postopkovne ukrepe za obravnavo tega položaja, zlasti bi bilo treba povečati število sodnikov.
Making use of the possibility provided for by the Treaties of increasing the number of Judges of the General Court would allow for a reduction within a short time of both the volume of pending cases and the excessive duration of proceedings before the General Court.
Uporaba možnosti povečanja števila sodnikov Splošnega sodišča, določene v Pogodbah, bi omogočila hitro zmanjšanje števila nerešenih zadev in skrajšanje čezmernega trajanja postopkov na Splošnem sodišču.
Taking into account the evolution of the workload of the General Court, the number of Judges should be fixed at 56 at the end of a three-stage process, two Judges being appointed upon a proposal by each of the Member States, it being understood that at no point of time can there be more than two Judges sitting at the General Court appointed upon a proposal by the same Member State.
Ob upoštevanju razvoja obsega dela bi morali število sodnikov Splošnega sodišča določiti tako, da bo ob koncu tristopenjskega procesa znašalo 56, s tem da se na predlog posamezne države članice imenuje po dva sodnika, pri čemer se razume, da ne moreta biti na Splošnem sodišču v nobenem trenutku več kot dva sodnika, imenovana na predlog iste države članice.
The panel provided for in Article 255 TFEU takes into account, in particular, independence, impartiality, expertise and the professional and personal suitability of the candidates.
Odbor iz člena 255 PDEU upošteva zlasti neodvisnost, nepristranskost, strokovno znanje ter poklicno in osebno primernost kandidatov.
In order to rapidly reduce the backlog of pending cases, twelve additional Judges should take office upon entry into force of this Regulation.
Da bi hitro zmanjšali sodni zaostanek, bi moralo ob začetku veljavnosti te uredbe mandat nastopiti dvanajst dodatnih sodnikov.
In September 2016, first instance jurisdiction in European Union civil service cases and the seven posts of the Judges sitting at the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (‘Civil Service Tribunal’) should be transferred to the General Court, on the basis of the legislative request already announced by the Court of Justice.
Septembra 2016 bi bilo treba pristojnost za odločanje na prvi stopnji v zadevah v zvezi z javnimi uslužbenci Evropske unije in mesta sedmih sodnikov na Sodišču za uslužbence Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sodišče za uslužbence) na podlagi že objavljene zakonodajne zahteve Sodišča prenesti na Splošno sodišče.
That request will consider the modalities of the transfer of the seven posts of Judges of the Civil Service Tribunal, including staff and resources.
Navedena zahteva bo obravnavala podrobnosti prenosa mest sedmih sodnikov Sodišča za uslužbence, vključno z osebjem in viri.