natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As mentioned in recitals 36 and 37 the tartaric acid produced by the sole cooperating producer in Australia was found to be alike with the product produced and exported by the PRC albeit the difference in production process.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 36 in 37, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je vinska kislina, ki jo proizvaja edini sodelujoči proizvajalec v Avstraliji, podoben izdelku, ki se proizvaja v LRK in iz nje izvaža, kljub različnim postopkom proizvodnje.
On basis of the information available, the domestic Australian market was therefore deemed appropriate for the purpose of establishing normal value.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij se je štelo, da je avstralski domači trg primeren za ugotavljanje normalne vrednosti.
The exporting producer claimed that the Argentinian, Australian and US export prices of tartaric acid are much lower than Bioking's export prices and therefore using those prices would confirm the absence of dumping.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da so izvozne cene vinske kisline iz Argentine, Avstralije in ZDA mnogo nižje od izvoznih cen družbe Bioking, zato bi uporaba navedenih cen potrdila neobstoj dampinga.
The claim is irrelevant because an analogue country is not selected depending on the level of its export prices.
Trditev je brezpredmetna, ker se primerljiva država ne izbira glede na raven izvoznih cen.
Moreover, only one producer from one potential analogue country provided the necessary cooperation.
Poleg tega je potrebno sodelovanje zagotovil le en proizvajalec iz ene morebitne primerljive države.
The exporting producer made furthermore claims concerning the product scope.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je podal dodatne trditve glede obsega izdelka.
These are addressed in the recitals 34 to 38 above.
Te so obravnavane v uvodnih izjavah 34–38.
In view of the fact that only one producer in one potential analogue country cooperated and given that Australia is considered as an appropriate analogue market, the Commission selected Australia as an analogue country under Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na to, da je sodeloval le en proizvajalec v eni morebitni primerljivi državi, ter glede na to, da se Avstralija šteje za primeren primerljiv trg, je Komisija v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe za primerljivo državo izbrala Avstralijo.
In the latest interim review of the measures in force applicable to the PRC except for Bioking [16] Argentina was selected as an analogue country.
V zadnjem vmesnem pregledu veljavnih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za LRK, razen za Bioking [16], je bila kot primerljiva država izbrana Argentina.
The normal value was based on a constructed value reflecting the objective differences in the production method between Argentina and the PRC which was found to have a significant impact on prices and costs.
Normalna vrednost je temeljila na konstruirani vrednosti, ki je odražala objektivne razlike med proizvodnima metodama v Argentini in v LRK, za kateri je bilo ugotovljeno, da imata bistven vpliv na cene in stroške.
In the case at hand, the difference in the production method between Australia and the PRC is also present.
Tudi v obravnavanem primeru obstaja razlika med proizvodnima metodama v Argentini in LRK.
The investigation revealed no circumstances that would justify a different approach than the one followed in the interim review.
Preiskava ni razkrila nobenih okoliščin, ki bi utemeljile uporabo drugačnega pristopa od pristopa, uporabljenega v vmesnem pregledu.
Interested parties did not put forward any comment in this respect either.
Zainteresirane strani v zvezi s tem niso predložile nobenih pripomb.
Therefore, it is considered that normal value should be based on a constructed normal value in Australia reflecting the objective differences in the production method between Australia and the PRC.
Zato se šteje, da bi morala normalna vrednost temeljiti na konstruirani normalni vrednosti v Avstraliji, ki bi odražala objektivne razlike med proizvodnima metodama v Argentini in LRK.
To that end, the Commission used the price of the maleic anhydride as found in Taiwan for the purposes of the MET determination (see recital 42) as the starting point for its calculation of the costs of manufacturing.
Zato je Komisija kot izhodišče za izračun proizvodnih stroškov uporabila ceno anhidrida maleinske kisline v Tajvanu za namene določitve TGO (glej uvodno izjavo 42).
A reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs (‘SG&A’) and for profit was determined on the basis of the actual data of the analogue country producer.
Za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („stroški PSA“) in za dobiček je bil na podlagi dejanskih podatkov proizvajalca v primerljivi državi določen razumen znesek.
The sole cooperating Australian producer produced and sold only one product type that was identical to one of the product types sold for export to the Union by the exporting producer.
Edini sodelujoči avstralski proizvajalec je proizvajal in prodajal samo eno vrsto izdelka, enako eni izmed vrst izdelka, ki jo je proizvajalec izvoznik prodajal za izvoz v EU.
The Commission used the constructed normal value of the type of tartaric acid produced and sold in Australia as corresponding to all the types of tartaric acid sold and exported by Bioking to the Union during the investigation period.
Komisija je uporabila konstruirano normalno vrednost za vrsto vinske kisline, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v Avstraliji in ki ustreza vsem vrstam vinske kisline, ki jih je Bioking prodajal in izvažal v Unijo v obdobju preiskave.
The approach was considered appropriate in this case since the production process for all types of tartaric acid sold and exported by Bioking to the Union during the investigation period was essentially the same and because the examination of the production process showed existence of virtually no differences in their cost of production.
Pristop je bil v tem primeru ocenjen kot primeren, saj je bil proizvodni postopek za vse vrste vinske kisline, ki jih je Bioking prodajal in izvažal v Unijo v obdobju preiskave, v bistvu enak in ker je proučitev postopka proizvodnje pokazala praktičen neobstoj razlik v njihovih stroških proizvodnje.
The exporting producer exported directly to independent customers in the Union.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je izvažal neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
Therefore, the export price was based on the price actually paid or payable for the product concerned when sold for export to the Union, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je izvozna cena temeljila na tisti, ki se je dejansko plačevala ali se plačuje za zadevni izdelek ob prodaji za izvoz v Unijo, v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission compared the normal value and the export price of the exporting producer on an ex-works basis.
Komisija je normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno proizvajalca izvoznika primerjala na podlagi franko tovarna.
Adjustments were made for non-refundable export VAT, handling, loading, freight and ancillary expenses, ocean freight, ocean insurance, credit cost, packing, warranty and guarantee expenses and bank charges.
Izvedene so bile prilagoditve v zvezi z nevračljivim izvoznim DDV, manipulativnimi izdatki, izdatki za natovarjanje in prevoz ter tozadevnimi izdatki, stroški čezmorskega prevoza in zavarovanja za čezmorski prevoz ter kredita, izdatki pakiranja, jamstev in zavarovanja ter bančnimi stroški.
Regarding the adjustment for non-refundable export VAT, it was found that on the Chinese domestic market a lower level of VAT was reimbursed on export sales than what is reimbursed for domestic sales.
Glede prilagoditve v zvezi z nevračljivim izvoznim DDV je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil na kitajskem domačem trgu za izvoz povrnjen DDV z nižjimi stopnjami kot za domačo prodajo.
On this basis, the normal value in Australia was determined by adding the non-refundable VAT rate applicable to export sales from the PRC.
Na podlagi tega je bila normalna vrednost v Avstraliji določena s prištevanjem nevračljive stopnje DDV, ki se je uporabljala za izvoz iz LRK.
Comments relating to dumping from interested parties following disclosure
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani v zvezi z dampingom po razkritju
After final disclosure, comments relating to dumping were received from the exporting producer and the complainants.
Po končnem razkritju so proizvajalec izvoznik in pritožniki predložili pripombe v zvezi z dampingom.
The exporting producer reiterated its earlier claim that Bioking should be granted MET.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je ponovil svojo prejšnjo trditev, da bi morala biti za Bioking odobrena TGO.
Firstly, it argued again that the choice of Taiwan for the purpose of comparing the Chinese domestic prices of maleic anhydride is not appropriate since prices of maleic anhydride in Taiwan are too high compared to other third countries.
Prvič, trdil je, da izbira Tajvana za namene primerjave kitajskih domačih cen za anhidrid maleinske kisline ni bila primerna, saj so cene anhidrida maleinske kisline v Tajvanu previsoke v primerjavi z drugimi tretjimi državami.
However, as mentioned in recitals 42 and 43, Taiwan is considered to be the most appropriate choice and, as explained in recital 43, alternative markets investigated by the Commission even show higher price differences than the one for Taiwan.
Vendar je, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 42 in 43, Tajvan obveljal kot najprimernejša izbira in alternativni trgi, ki jih je Komisija preiskala, kažejo še večje razlike v cenah kot tisti v Tajvanu, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 43.
In the absence of well-founded reasons to reject Taiwan and in the absence of a relevant proposal for a better alternative, this claim was rejected.
V odsotnosti utemeljenih razlogov za zavrnitev Tajvana in relevantnih predlogov za boljšo alternativo je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
Bioking also claimed that the geographical proximity cannot be a decisive factor in choosing the comparable market and that the data may be distorted by direct or indirect government intervention.
Bioking je trdil tudi, da geografska bližina ne more biti odločilni dejavnik pri izbiri primerljivega trga in da je neposredno ali posredno vladno posredovanje morda izkrivilo podatke.
Bioking did not however provide any evidence to support any claimed intervention by the Taiwanese government and this claim is therefore rejected.
Vendar Bioking ni predložil nobenih dokazov za domnevno posredovanje tajvanske vlade, zato se ta trditev zavrne.
Secondly, it reiterated its argument to use export prices of maleic anhydride instead of domestic prices without coming with different arguments as already addressed in recitals 48 and 49.
Drugič, ponovil je svoj argument za uporabo izvoznih namesto domačih cen anhidrida maleinske kisline, ne da bi predstavil druge argumente kot tiste, ki so že obravnavani v uvodnih izjavah 48 in 49.
Thirdly, it was again argued that the VAT impact as calculated by the Commission was overstated and that if this was differently calculated, the price difference between Chinese and Taiwanese domestic prices of maleic anhydride would be insignificant.
Tretjič, ponovno je trdil, da je bil vpliv DDV po izračunu Komisije precenjen in da bi bila ob drugačnem načinu izračunavanja razlika med kitajskimi in tajvanskimi domačimi cenami anhidrida maleinske kisline zanemarljiva.
In the absence however of new substantiated arguments, the explanation given in recital 50 is still valid and this claim was consequently rejected.
Vendar v odsotnosti novih utemeljenih argumentov še naprej velja razlaga iz uvodne izjave 50, ta trditev pa je bila posledično zavrnjena.
Fourthly, the distortion through State interference of the benzene prices was once more challenged.
Četrtič, znova je bilo izpodbijano izkrivljanje cen benzena zaradi vmešavanja države.
Since no new elements as already addressed in recitals 50 to 52 were brought forward, this claim was rejected.
Ker niso bili predloženi drugi elementi kot tisti, ki so že obravnavani v uvodnih izjavah 50–52, je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
Finally, as regards the MET claim, the exporting producer reiterated the compliance of the Chinese VAT refund regime with Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 and the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing measures without providing new elements as already addressed in recitals 53 to 55.
Končno, proizvajalec izvoznik je v zvezi s svojim zahtevkom za TGO ponovno trdil, da je kitajski režim povračila DDV skladen z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 in Sporazumom STO o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih, ne da bi predložil nove elemente kot tiste, ki so že obravnavani v uvodnih izjavah 53–55.
This claim was therefore rejected and the Commission reiterated its conclusion of recital 61 that the exporting producer could not be granted MET in this investigation.
Komisija je zato to trditev zavrnila in ponovila svoj sklep iz uvodne izjave 61, da proizvajalcu izvozniku v tej preiskavi TGO ne more biti odobrena.
The same party once more repeated its argumentation that the price of maleic anhydride in Taiwan is not appropriate for the determination of the constructed normal value and that the US export price to Mexico would constitute a better basis.
Ista stran je še enkrat ponovila svojo argumentacijo, da cena anhidrida maleinske kisline v Tajvanu ni primerna za določanje konstruirane normalne vrednosti in da bi izvozna cena iz ZDA v Mehiko predstavljala boljšo podlago.
As addressed already in the recital 49 above the price comparison was made on the most comparable basis, which is by comparing domestic prices with similar delivery terms on similar and geographically closest markets.
Kot je bilo obravnavano že v uvodni izjavi 49, je bila primerjava cen izvedena na čim bolj primerljivi podlagi, tj. s primerjavo domačih cen s podobnimi dobavnimi pogoji na podobnih in geografsko najbližjih trgih.
The exporter did not provide evidence to support its claim why export prices from USA to Mexico would constitute a better basis for comparison.
Izvoznik ni predložil dokazov za utemeljitev trditve, da naj bi bile izvozne cene iz ZDA v Mehiko boljša podlaga za primerjavo.
The complainants submitted comments regarding Bioking's alleged capacity expansion after the investigation period.
Pritožniki so predložili pripombe glede domnevnega povečanja zmogljivosti družbe Bioking po obdobju preiskave.
Firstly, it has to be noted that these post investigation period developments are normally not taken into account.
Treba je poudariti, da se razvoj po obdobju preiskave običajno ne upošteva.
Furthermore, since the construction of the new production facility to replace the existing factory was in progress during the investigation there was no data on the total of Bioking's capacity after its completion.
Poleg tega je bila med preiskavo v teku gradnja novega proizvodnega obrata za zamenjavo obstoječe tovarne in zato podatki o skupni zmogljivosti družbe Bioking po končani gradnji niso bili na voljo.
Therefore this claim could not be taken into account and was rejected.
Zato te trditve ni bilo mogoče upoštevati in je bila zavrnjena.
The complainants also contested the methodology used to calculate the dumping margin for Hangzhou Bioking which was the same as that applied in the last interim review and involved a construction of the normal value rather than the use of actual prices.
Pritožniki so izpodbijali tudi metodologijo izračuna stopnje dampinga za Hangzhou Bioking, ki je bila enaka kot tista, ki je bila uporabljena v zadnjem vmesnem pregledu in je namesto dejanskih cen vključevala konstruirano normalno vrednost.
They further claimed that had the actual prices of the analogue country producer been used, it could be envisaged that the dumping duty rate found for Hangzhou Bioking would be even higher.
Nadalje so trdili, da bi bila ob uporabi dejanske cene proizvajalca v primerljivi državi za Hangzhou Bioking verjetno določena še višja stopnja dampinške dajatve.
As explained in the recital 69 the investigation revealed no circumstances that would justify a different approach than the one followed in the interim review.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 69, preiskava ni razkrila nobenih okoliščin, ki bi utemeljile uporabo drugačnega pristopa od pristopa, uporabljenega v vmesnem pregledu.
Neither did interested parties put forward any arguments in this respect.
Zainteresirane strani prav tako niso predložile nobenih argumentov v zvezi s tem.
Therefore, it is maintained that normal value should be based on a constructed normal value in Australia reflecting the objective differences in the production method between Australia and the PRC.
Zato se vztraja, da bi morala normalna vrednost temeljiti na konstruirani normalni vrednosti v Avstraliji, ki odraža objektivne razlike med proizvodnima metodama v Avstraliji in LRK.
The Commission compared the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price as established above, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe primerjala tehtano povprečno normalno vrednost in tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno, kakor je določeno zgoraj.
On this basis, the weighted average dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the Cost, Insurance and Freight (‘CIF’) Union frontier price, duty unpaid, is as follows:
Na podlagi tega je tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene stroškov, zavarovanja in prevoznine („CIF“) meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, naslednja:
As mentioned in recital 1 above, during the period considered anti-dumping duties were in force for imports of tartaric acid from the PRC, with the exception of imports from Bioking that were subject to a zero duty.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 1, so v obravnavanem obdobju veljale protidampinške dajatve za uvoz vinske kisline iz LRK, z izjemo za uvoz družbe Bioking, za katero se je uporabljala stopnja dajatve nič.
The measures in force were last maintained following an expiry review in 2012 as referred to in recital 3 above.
Veljavni ukrepi so bili nazadnje potrjeni leta 2012 po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 3.
The expiry review found that the measures in force shielded to a large extent the Union industry from the effects of the dumped imports and it concluded that there was a likelihood that injury would recur if measures lapse.
Med pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa je bilo ugotovljeno, da so veljavni ukrepi v veliki meri ščitili industrijo Unije pred učinki dampinškega uvoza, poleg tega pa je bilo sklenjeno, da obstaja verjetnost, da bi se v primeru izteka ukrepov škoda ponovila.
The current investigation is concerned only with the dumped imports from Bioking and their volume and effect on Union market prices and on the Union industry.
Predmet sedanje preiskave je le dampinški uvoz družbe Bioking in njenega obsega ter vpliva na cene na trgu Unije in industrijo Unije.
However, the effect of Bioking's imports was evaluated in the context of the effects of measures in force protecting the Union industry from the harmful effects of dumped imports from the rest of the PRC.
Vendar je bil vpliv uvoza družbe Bioking ocenjen v okviru učinka veljavnih ukrepov, ki ščitijo industrijo Unije pred škodljivimi učinki dampinškega uvoza iz preostale LRK.
Given the fact that only one exporting producer was subject to the current investigation, all figures related to business confidential data had to be indexed for reasons of confidentiality.
Glede na to, da sedanja preiskava obravnava le enega proizvajalca izvoznika, je bilo treba zaradi zaupnosti indeksirati vse podatke, povezane z zaupnimi poslovnimi informacijami.
DEFINITION OF THE UNION INDUSTRY AND UNION PRODUCTION
OPREDELITEV POJMOV INDUSTRIJA UNIJE IN PROIZVODNJA UNIJE
The like product was manufactured by nine producers in the Union during the investigation period.
Podobni izdelek je v obdobju preiskave proizvajalo devet proizvajalcev Unije.
Therefore, these nine producers constitute the Union industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zato teh devet proizvajalcev predstavlja industrijo Unije v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
The total Union production during the investigation period was established at around 23000 tonnes.
Celotna proizvodnja Unije je bila v obdobju preiskave določena na približno 23000 ton.
The Commission established total Union production on the basis of information provided in the complaint, cross-checked against information collected during the on-spot verifications of the sampled Union producers.
Komisija je celotno proizvodnjo Unije določila na podlagi informacij iz pritožbe, ki jih je preverila glede na podatke, zbrane med preveritvami vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije na kraju samem.
As indicated in recitals 15 to 20, three Union producers were selected in the sample representing around 56 % of the total Union production of the like product.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 15–20, so bili v vzorec izbrani trije proizvajalci Unije, ki so predstavljali približno 56 % celotne proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
The Commission established the Union consumption on the basis of (i) the sales volume of the Union industry on the Union market obtained from the sampled Union producers, and from the complaint for the remaining Union producers (actual data of the complainants and the estimates for other Union producers);
Komisija je potrošnjo Unije določila na podlagi (i) podatkov o obsegu prodaje industrije Unije na trgu Unije, ki so jih predložili vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, ter podatkov iz pritožbe za druge proizvajalce Unije (dejanski podatki pritožnikov in ocena za druge proizvajalce Unije);
the total import volume from the PRC based on the Chinese export database, and the exporting producer concerned and (iii) the import volume from the other third countries based on Eurostat.
skupni obseg uvoza iz LRK na podlagi kitajske zbirke podatkov o izvozu ter zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika in (iii) obseg uvoza iz drugih tretjih držav na podlagi podatkov Eurostata.
The total imports from the PRC could not be reliably based on Eurostat data in this case.
V tej zadevi celotnega uvoza iz LRK ni bilo mogoče zanesljivo oceniti na podlagi podatkov Eurostata.
The volumes reported by the exporting producer concerned were substantially higher than the total imports from the PRC on the basis of Eurostat for each year of the period considered.
Obseg, o katerem je poročal zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik, je bil bistveno večji od skupnega uvoza iz LRK na podlagi podatkov Eurostata za vsako leto obravnavanega obdobja.
On this basis, the data recorded in Eurostat from the PRC could not be used.
Na podlagi tega ni bilo mogoče uporabiti podatkov Eurostata, ki se nanašajo na LRK.
On the other hand, the volume reported by the exporting producer concerned was in conformity with the volume reported in the Chinese export database.
Po drugi strani pa je bil obseg, o katerem je poročal zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik, v skladu z obsegom, zabeleženim v kitajski zbirki podatkov o izvozu.
Union consumption (kg)
Potrošnja Unije (v kg)
the complaint, data of the sampled Union producers and exporting producer, Chinese export database, Eurostat.
pritožba, podatki vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije in proizvajalca izvoznika, kitajska zbirka podatkov o izvozu, Eurostat.
Union consumption decreased by 11 % in the period considered.
Potrošnja Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšala za 11 %.
It first increased by 6 % between 2011 and 2012 but then decreased by 3 % in 2013 and by 14 %, in the investigation period.
Najprej se je med letoma 2011 in 2012 povečala za 6 %, nato pa leta 2013 zmanjšala za 3 % in v obdobju preiskave za 14 %.
DUMPED IMPORTS FROM BIOKING
DAMPINŠKI UVOZ DRUŽBE BIOKING
Volume and market share of the dumped imports from Bioking
Obseg in tržni delež dampinškega uvoza družbe Bioking
The Commission established the total volume of dumped imports from Bioking on the basis of its own data.
Komisija je celotni obseg dampinškega uvoza družbe Bioking določila na podlagi njenih podatkov.
Imports into the Union from Bioking developed as follows:
Uvoz družbe Bioking v Unijo se je gibal na naslednji način:
data of the exporting producer.
podatki proizvajalca izvoznika.
Import volume Index
Obseg uvoza (indeks)
Market share Index
Tržni delež (indeks)