natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, during a reasonable transition period, in relation to domestic debit card transactions, Member States should be able to apply to all domestic debit card transactions within each payment card scheme a weighted average interchange fee of no more than the 0,2 % of the annual average transaction value of all domestic debit card transactions within each payment card scheme.
Zato bi morale v razumnem prehodnem obdobju v zvezi z domačimi transakcijami z debetnimi karticami države članice imeti možnost, da se za vse domače transakcije z debetnimi karticami v okviru posamezne sheme plačilnih kartic uporabi ponderirana povprečna medbančna provizija, ki ne presega 0,2 % povprečne letne vrednosti transakcij vseh domačih transakcij z debetnimi karticami v okviru posamezne sheme plačilnih kartic.
In relation to the interchange fee cap calculated on the annual average transaction value within one payment card scheme, it is sufficient that a payment service provider participates in a payment card scheme (or some other type of agreements among payment service providers) in which, for all domestic debit card transactions, a weighted average interchange fee of no more than the 0,2 % is applied.
V razmerju do omejitve višine medbančne provizije, izračunane na podlagi letne povprečne vrednosti transakcij v okviru posamezne sheme plačilnih kartic, zadostuje, da ponudnik plačilnih storitev sodeluje v shemi plačilnih kartic (ali drugem dogovoru med ponudniki plačilnih storitev), v okviru katere se za vse domače transakcije z debetnimi karticami uporablja ponderirana povprečna medbančna provizija, ki ne presega 0,2 %.
Here, too, a flat fee or a percentage fee or a combination of the two can be applied provided that the weighted average maximum cap is respected.
Tudi v tem primeru se lahko uporabi pavšalni znesek ali odstotna stopnja ali kombinacija obojega, če se upošteva najvišja dovoljena ponderirana povprečna provizija.
In order to define the relevant interchange fee caps for domestic debit card transactions, it is appropriate to allow national competent authorities entitled to ensure compliance with this Regulation to collect information regarding the volume and value of all debit card transactions within a payment card scheme or of the debit card transactions pertaining to one or more payment service providers.
Za opredelitev ustreznih omejitev višine medbančnih provizij za domače transakcije z debetnimi karticami je primerno nacionalnim pristojnim organom, odgovornim za zagotavljanje skladnosti s to uredbo, omogočiti zbiranje informacij glede obsega in vrednosti za vse transakcije z debetnimi karticami v okviru posamezne sheme plačilnih kartic ali transakcije z debetnimi karticami enega ali več ponudnikov plačilnih storitev.
As a consequence, payment card schemes and payment service providers should be obliged to provide relevant data to national competent authorities as specified by those authorities and in accordance with the time limits set by them.
Sheme plačilnih kartic in ponudniki plačilnih storitev bi posledično morali biti dolžni nacionalnim pristojnim organom zagotavljati zadevne podatke na način ter v rokih, ki jih določijo ti organi.
Reporting obligations should extend to payment service providers such as issuers or acquirers and not only to payment card schemes, in order to ensure that any relevant information is made available to the competent authorities which should, in any case, be able to require that such information is collected through the payment card scheme.
Obveznosti poročanja bi morali razširiti tudi na ponudnike plačilnih storitev, kot so izdajatelji ali pridobitelji, in ne le na sheme plačilnih kartic, s čimer bi zagotovili, da bi bile vse zadevne informacije na voljo pristojnim organom, ki bi morali imeti možnost vedno zahtevali, da se te informacije zbirajo v okviru sheme plačilnih kartic.
Moreover, it is important that Member States ensure an adequate level of disclosure of the relevant information concerning the applicable interchange fee caps.
Poleg tega je pomembno, da države članice zagotovijo ustrezno raven razkritja zadevnih informacij glede veljavnih omejitev višine medbančnih provizij.
In light of the fact that payment card schemes are generally not payment service providers subject to prudential supervision, competent authorities may require that the information sent by these entities is certified by an independent auditor.
Glede na dejstvo, da sheme plačilnih kartic načeloma niso ponudniki plačilnih storitev, ki so predmet bonitetnega nadzora, lahko pristojni organi zahtevajo, da informacije, ki jih posredujejo ti subjekti, potrdi neodvisni revizor.
Some payment instruments at domestic level enable the payer to initiate card-based payment transactions that are not distinguishable as debit or credit card transactions by the payment card scheme.
Nekateri plačilni instrumenti na domači ravni omogočajo plačniku, da odredi kartične plačilne transakcije, pri katerih shema plačilnih kartic ne razlikuje, ali gre za transakcije z debetno ali kreditno kartico.
The choices made by the cardholder are unknown to the payment card scheme and to the acquirer; as a consequence, the payment card scheme does not have the possibility of applying the different caps imposed by this Regulation for debit and credit card transactions, which are distinguishable on the basis of the timing agreed for the debiting of the payment transactions.
Izbire imetnika kartice shemi plačilnih kartic in pridobitelju niso znane; sheme plačilnih kartic zato nimajo možnosti uporabe različnih omejitev, ki jih ta uredba nalaga za transakcije z debetnimi in kreditnimi karticami, ki jih je mogoče razlikovati na podlagi dogovorjene časovne razporeditve za bremenitev plačilnih transakcij.
Taking into account the need to preserve the functionality of the existing business models while avoiding unjustified or excessive costs of legal compliance and, at the same time, considering the importance of ensuring an adequate level playing field between the different categories of payment cards, it is appropriate to apply the same rule provided by this Regulation for the debit card transactions to such domestic ‘universal cards’ payment transactions.
Glede na potrebo po ohranitvi funkcionalnosti obstoječih poslovnih modelov, pri čemer se je treba izogniti neupravičenim ali pretiranim stroškom zagotavljanja skladnosti z zakonodajo, hkrati pa je treba zagotoviti enake konkurenčne pogoje med različnimi kategorijami plačilnih kartic, je primerno za take domače plačilne transakcije z „univerzalnimi karticami“ uporabiti enako pravilo, kot ga ta uredba nalaga za transakcije z debetnimi karticami.
Nevertheless, a longer time period for adaptation should be left to those payment instruments.
Vendar pa bi bilo treba tem plačilnim instrumentom dovoliti daljši rok za prilagoditev.
Therefore, by way of exception and during a transition period of 18 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, Member States should be able to define a maximum share of domestic ‘universal cards’ payment transactions which are considered as being equivalent to credit card transactions.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da z odstopanjem od navedenega v prehodnem obdobju 18 mesecev po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe določijo najvišji delež domačih plačilnih transakcij z „univerzalnimi karticami“, ki štejejo za enakovredne transakcijam s kreditnimi karticami.
For example, the credit card cap could be applied to the defined share of the total value of the transactions for merchants or acquirers.
Na primer omejitev za kreditne kartice bi se lahko uporabila za določen delež skupne vrednosti transakcij za trgovce ali pridobitelje.
The mathematical result of the provisions would then be equivalent to the application of a single interchange fee cap on domestic payment transactions carried out with universal cards.
Matematični rezultat določb bi bil tako enakovreden uporabi enotne omejitve višine medbančnih provizij za domače plačilne transakcije z univerzalnimi karticami.
This Regulation should cover all transactions where the payer's payment service provider and the payee's payment service provider are located in the Union.
Ta uredba bi morala zajemati vse transakcije, pri katerih se ponudnik plačilnih storitev plačnika in ponudnik plačilnih storitev prejemnika plačila nahajata v Uniji.
In accordance with the principle of technological neutrality set out in the Digital Agenda for Europe, this Regulation should apply to card-based payment transactions regardless of the environment in which this transaction takes place, including through retail payment instruments and services which can be off-line, on-line or mobile.
V skladu z načelom tehnološke nevtralnosti iz Evropske digitalne agende bi se morala ta uredba uporabljati za kartične plačilne transakcije ne glede na okolje, v katerem se izvede transakcija, tudi prek maloprodajnih plačilnih instrumentov in storitev, ki se izvajajo zunaj spleta, prek spleta ali mobilno.
Card-based payment transactions are generally carried out on the basis of two main business models, so-called ‘three party payment card schemes’ (cardholder — acquiring and issuing scheme — merchant) and ‘four party payment card schemes’ (cardholder — issuing bank — acquiring bank — merchant).
Kartične plačilne transakcije se na splošno izvajajo na podlagi dveh glavnih poslovnih modelov, in sicer t. i. tristranskih shem plačilnih kartic (imetnik kartice – shema pridobivanja in izdajanja – trgovec) in štiristranskih shem plačilnih kartic (imetnik kartice – banka izdajateljica – banka pridobiteljica – trgovec).
Many four party payment card schemes use an explicit interchange fee, which is mostly multilateral.
Veliko štiristranskih shem plačilnih kartic uporablja eksplicitno medbančno provizijo, večinoma večstransko.
To acknowledge the existence of implicit interchange fees and contribute to the creation of a level playing field, three party payment card schemes using payment service providers as issuers or acquirers should be considered as four party payment card schemes and should follow the same rules, whilst transparency and other measures related to business rules should apply to all providers.
Zaradi priznanja obstoja implicitnih medbančnih provizij in zagotavljanja enakih konkurenčnih pogojev bi bilo treba tristranske sheme plačilnih kartic, ki ponudnike plačilnih storitev uporabljajo kot izdajatelje ali pridobitelje, obravnavati kot štiristranske sheme plačilnih kartic in zanje uporabljati enaka pravila, medtem ko bi se morali preglednost in drugi ukrepi v zvezi s poslovnimi pravili uporabljati za vse ponudnike.
However, taking into account the specificities which exist for such three party schemes, it is appropriate to allow for a transitional period during which Member States may decide not to apply the rules concerning the interchange fee cap if such schemes have a very limited market share in the Member State concerned.
Vendar je ob upoštevanju posebnosti, ki obstajajo za to vrsto tristranskih shem, primerno omogočiti prehodno obdobje, v katerem se države članice lahko odločijo, da ne uporabijo pravil glede omejitve višine medbančnih provizij, če imajo take sheme zelo omejen tržni delež v zadevni državi članici.
The issuing service is based on a contractual relationship between the issuer of the payment instrument and the payer, irrespective of whether the issuer is holding the funds on behalf of the payer.
Storitev izdajanja temelji na pogodbenem razmerju med izdajateljem plačilnega instrumenta in plačnikom, ne glede na to, ali izdajatelj razpolaga s sredstvi v imenu plačnika.
The issuer makes payment cards available to the payer, authorises transactions at terminals or their equivalent and may guarantee payment to the acquirer for transactions that are in conformity with the rules of the relevant scheme.
Izdajatelj da plačilne kartice na voljo plačniku, odobri transakcije na terminalih ali njim enakovrednih napravah in pridobitelju lahko zagotavlja plačilo za transakcije, ki so skladne s predpisi zadevne sheme.
Therefore, the mere distribution of payment cards or technical services, such as the mere processing and storage of data, does not constitute issuing.
Zato sama distribucija plačilnih kartic ali tehnične storitve, kot sta zgolj obdelovanje in hramba podatkov, ne šteje za izdajanje.
The acquiring service constitutes a chain of operations from the initiation of a card-based payment transaction to the transfer of the funds to the payment account of the payee.
Storitve pridobivanja zajemajo vrsto operacij od odobritve kartične plačilne transakcije do prenosa sredstev na plačilni račun prejemnika plačila.
Depending on the Member State and the business model in place, the acquiring service is organised differently.
Odvisno od države članice in vzpostavljenega poslovnega modela se organizacija storitve pridobivanja razlikuje.
Therefore the payment service provider paying the interchange fee does not always contract directly with the payee.
Zato ponudnik plačilnih storitev, ki plača medbančno provizijo, ni vedno v neposrednem pogodbenem razmerju s prejemnikom plačila.
Intermediaries providing part of the acquiring services but without direct contractual relationship with payees should nevertheless be covered in the definition of acquirer under this Regulation.
Vendar bi morali biti posredniki, ki opravljajo del storitev pridobivanja, nimajo pa neposrednega pogodbenega razmerja s prejemnikom plačila, vseeno zajeti v opredelitvi pridobitelja iz te uredbe.
The acquiring service is provided irrespective of whether the acquirer is holding the funds on behalf of the payee.
Storitev pridobivanja ni odvisna od tega, ali pridobitelj razpolaga s sredstvi v imenu prejemnika plačila.
Technical services, such as the mere processing and storage of data or the operation of terminals, do not constitute acquiring.
Tehnične storitve, kot so zgolj obdelovanje in hramba podatkov ali obratovanje terminalov, ne štejejo za pridobivanje.
It is important to ensure that the provisions concerning the interchange fees to be paid or received by payment service providers are not circumvented by alternative flows of fees to issuers.
Pomembno je zagotoviti, da se določbe v zvezi z medbančnimi provizijami, ki jih plačajo ali prejmejo ponudniki plačilnih storitev, ne zaobhajajo z drugimi pritoki provizij, ki jih prejmejo izdajatelji.
To avoid this, the ‘net compensation’ of fees paid or received by the issuer, including possible authorisation charges, from or to a payment card scheme, an acquirer or any other intermediary should be considered as the interchange fee.
V ta namen bi morali „neto plačilo“ provizij, ki jih, vključno z morebitnimi provizijami za dovoljenja, izdajatelj plača shemi plačilnih kartic, pridobitelju ali kateremu koli drugemu posredniku oziroma jih od le-teh prejme, šteti za medbančno provizijo.
When calculating the interchange fee, for the purpose of checking whether circumvention is taking place the total amount of payments or incentives received by an issuer from a payment card scheme with respect to the regulated transactions less the fees paid by the issuer to the payment card scheme should be taken into account.
Pri izračunu medbančne provizije bi bilo treba zaradi preverjanja, ali prihaja do zaobhajanja, upoštevati celoten znesek razlike med plačili ali spodbudami, ki jih izdajatelj prejme od sheme plačilnih kartic v zvezi z reguliranimi transakcijami, ter provizijami, ki jih izdajatelj plača shemi plačilnih kartic.
Payments, incentives and fees considered could be direct (i.e. volume-based or transaction-specific) or indirect (including marketing incentives, bonuses, rebates for meeting certain transaction volumes).
Zadevna plačila, spodbude in provizije bi lahko bili neposredni (to je na podlagi obsega ali specifični za posamezno transakcijo) ali posredni (vključno s spodbudami za trženje, nagradami in popusti za doseganje določenih obsegov transakcij).
In checking whether circumvention of the provisions of this Regulation is taking place, issuers' profits resulting from special programmes carried out jointly by issuers and payment card schemes and revenue from processing, licensing and other fees providing revenue to payment card schemes should, in particular, be taken into account.
Pri preverjanju, ali prihaja do zaobhajanja določb te uredbe, bi bilo treba zlasti upoštevati dobičke izdajateljev, ustvarjene iz posebnih programov, ki jih skupaj izvajajo izdajatelji in sheme plačilnih kartic, prihodke iz obdelave in podeljevanja licenc ter druge provizije, ki so vir prihodkov za sheme plačilnih kartic.
As appropriate, and if corroborated by further objective elements, the issuance of payment cards in third countries could also be taken into account when assessing potential circumvention of this Regulation.
Pri oceni, ali morda prihaja do zaobhajanja določb te uredbe, bi lahko upoštevali tudi izdajanje plačilnih kartic v tretjih državah, če je to ustrezno in če to potrjujejo drugi objektivni dejavniki.
Consumers tend to be unaware of the fees paid by merchants for the payment instrument they use.
Potrošniki običajno niso seznanjeni s provizijami, ki jih trgovci plačujejo za plačilni instrument, ki ga uporabljajo.
At the same time, a series of incentivising practices applied by issuers (such as travel vouchers, bonuses, rebates, charge backs, free insurances, etc.) may steer consumers towards the use of payment instruments, thereby generating high fees for issuers.
Hkrati lahko razne spodbujevalne prakse, ki jih uporabljajo izdajatelji (kot so potovalni vavčerji, nagrade, popusti, povračila, brezplačna zavarovanja itd.), potrošnike usmerjajo v uporabo plačilnih instrumentov, s čimer izdajateljem ustvarjajo visoke provizije.
To counter this, the measures imposing restrictions on interchange fees should only apply to payment cards that have become mass products and merchants generally have difficulty refusing due to their widespread issuance and use (i.e. consumer debit and credit cards).
Temu bi se bilo mogoče izogniti tako, da bi se ukrepi, ki nalagajo omejitve za medbančne provizije, uporabljali le za plačilne kartice, ki so postale množični produkt in jih trgovci na splošno težko zavrnejo zaradi njihovega razširjenega izdajanja in uporabe (to je potrošniške debetne in kreditne kartice).
In order to enhance effective market functioning in the non-regulated parts of the sector and to limit the transfer of business from the regulated to the non-regulated parts of the sector, it is necessary to adopt a series of measures, including the separation of scheme and infrastructure, the steering of the payer by the payee and the selective acceptance of payment instruments by the payee.
Zaradi učinkovitejšega delovanja trga v nereguliranih delih sektorja in omejitve prenosa poslov iz reguliranih v neregulirane dele sektorja je treba sprejeti vrsto ukrepov, vključno z ločevanjem sheme in infrastrukture, usmerjanjem plačnika s strani prejemnika plačila ter selektivnim sprejemanjem plačilnih instrumentov s strani prejemnika plačila.
A separation of scheme and infrastructure should allow all processors to compete for customers of the schemes.
Ločevanje sheme in infrastrukture bi moralo vsem obdelovalcem omogočiti, da med seboj konkurirajo za potrošnike shem.
As the cost of processing is a significant part of the total cost of card acceptance, it is important for this part of the value chain to be opened to effective competition.
Ker so stroški obdelave pomemben del skupnih stroškov sprejemanja kartic, je pomembno, da je ta del vrednostne verige odprt za učinkovito konkurenco.
On the basis of the separation of scheme and infrastructure, card schemes and processing entities should be independent in terms of accounting, organisation and decision-making process.
Na podlagi ločevanja sheme in infrastrukture bi morali biti kartične sheme in obdelovalci neodvisni v smislu računovodstva, organizacije in postopka odločanja.
They should not discriminate, for instance by providing each other with preferential treatment or privileged information which is not available to their competitors on their respective market segment, imposing excessive information requirements on their competitor in their respective market segment, cross-subsidising their respective activities or having shared governance arrangements.
Ne bi smeli izvajati diskriminacije, na primer tako, da bi drug drugega obravnavali prednostno ali si izmenjevali zaupne informacije, ki niso na voljo njihovim tekmecem v zadevnem segmentu trga, da bi svojim tekmecem v zadevnem segmentu trga nalagali prekomerne zahteve v zvezi z informacijami, drug drugemu navzkrižno subvencionirali dejavnosti ali vzpostavljali ureditve deljenega upravljanja.
Such discriminatory practises contribute to market fragmentation, negatively impact market entry by new players and prevent pan-Union players from emerging, hence hindering the completion of the internal market in the area of card-based payments and internet and mobile payments based on cards, to the detriment of merchants, companies and consumers.
Takšne diskriminatorne prakse prispevajo k razdrobljenosti trga, negativno vplivajo na vstop novih udeležencev na trg in preprečujejo pojav vseevropskih udeležencev, s čimer ovirajo dokončno vzpostavitev notranjega trga na področju kartičnih plačil ter spletnih in mobilnih plačil na podlagi kartic ter tako škodijo trgovcem, podjetjem in potrošnikom.
Scheme rules applied by payment card schemes and practices applied by payment service providers tend to keep merchants and consumers ignorant about fee differences and reduce market transparency, for instance by ‘blending’ fees or prohibiting merchants from choosing a cheaper card brand on co-badged cards or steering consumers to the use of such cheaper cards.
Pravila sheme, ki jih uporabljajo sheme plačilnih kartic, in prakse, ki jih uporabljajo ponudniki plačilnih storitev, trgovcev in potrošnikov običajno namerno ne seznanjajo z razlikami v provizijah ter zmanjšujejo preglednost trga, na primer s „poenotenjem“ provizij ali prepovedjo za trgovce, da bi pri karticah s povezanimi blagovnimi znamkami izbrali cenejšo blagovno znamko kartice ali spodbujali potrošnike k uporabi takih cenejših kartic.
Even if merchants are aware of the different costs, the scheme rules often prevent them from acting to reduce the fees.
Tudi če so trgovci seznanjeni z različnimi stroški, je njihova možnost ukrepanja za znižanje provizij pogosto omejena s pravili sheme.
Payment instruments entail different costs to the payee, with certain instruments being more expensive than others.
Stroški plačilnih instrumentov so za prejemnika plačila različni, pri čemer so nekateri instrumenti dražji od drugih.
Except where a particular payment instrument is imposed by law for certain categories of payments or cannot be refused due to its legal tender status, the payee should be free, in accordance with Directive 2007/64/EC, to steer payers towards the use of a specific payment instrument.
Prejemnik plačila bi moral imeti v skladu z Direktivo 2007/64/ES pravico prosto usmerjati plačnike v uporabo določenega plačilnega instrumenta, razen kadar je določen plačilni instrument zakonsko predpisan za posamezne kategorije plačil ali ga ni mogoče zavrniti zaradi statusa zakonitega plačilnega sredstva.
Card schemes and payment service providers impose several restrictions on payees in this respect, examples of which include restrictions on the refusal by the payee of specific payment instruments for low amounts, on the provision of information to the payer on the fees incurred by the payee for specific payment instruments or limitation imposed on the payee of the number of tills in his or her shop which accept specific payment instruments.
Kartične sheme in ponudniki plačilnih storitev nalagajo prejemnikom plačil v zvezi s tem več omejitev, kar na primer vključuje omejitve za prejemnika plačila v zvezi z zavračanjem posameznih plačilnih instrumentov za majhne zneske in zagotavljanjem informacij plačniku o provizijah, ki jih mora prejemnik plačila plačati za posamezne plačilne instrumente, ali omejitev za prejemnika plačila v zvezi s številom blagajn v njegovi trgovini, ki sprejemajo posamezne plačilne instrumente.
Those restrictions should be abolished.
Te omejitve bi bilo treba odpraviti.