natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 14(1) of the Procedural Regulation stipulates that ‘The Commission shall not require recovery of the aid if this would be contrary to a general principle of Community law’.
V finančnem načrtu je navedeno, da „bo za predvideni razvoj družb BSCA in SAB potrebno precejšnje povečanje lastnega kapitala (poleg zunanjega financiranja) in torej nadaljnje spremljanje s strani družbe SOWAER“.
In particular, the Commission cannot require recovery of aid that, although granted within the 10-year period defined in Article 15(1) of the Procedural Regulation, may be covered by the existence of a legitimate expectation — in the mind of the beneficiary of the aid — resulting from acts or positions taken by the Commission in the past.
Druge deleže na podlagi povečanja kapitala so v skupnem znesku približno 133000 EUR vpisali nekateri manjšinski delničarji: družbe SONACA, Carolo Parking in Igretec.
As indicated in Section 5.4 of this decision, Belgium maintains that recovery of the subsidy paid by the Region for certain services associated with the airport activities would be contrary to the principle of legitimate expectations.
Družba BSCA je 6. julija 2012 sklenila nov sporazum z družbo Ryanair.
However, the Court of Justice has ruled that the beneficiary of unlawful aid may not in principle invoke a legitimate expectation [235].
Ker ta sporazum ni bil naveden niti med ukrepi, opredeljenimi v sklepu o začetku postopka iz leta 2002, niti med ukrepi, opredeljenimi v sklepu o razširitvi iz leta 2012, v tem sklepu ni obravnavan.
The beneficiary should in fact have checked that the aid granted had been notified to and approved by the Commission.
Informacija, podana na sestanku 24. junija 2003 med Komisijo in belgijskimi organi.
In this respect, the Commission notes that the aid granted to BSCA was not notified to the Commission.
Medtem ko je bila pristajalna pristojbina v splošnem sistemu, ki se je uporabljal za vse, izračunana glede na maso letal v tonah, je bila za družbo Ryanair izračunana na drugi osnovi in se je pobirala za vsakega vkrcanega potnika.
Absence of precise assurances
Točka 1.3 pogodbe med družbama BSCA in Ryanair z dne 2. decembra 2001.
Moreover, as clarified by the Court of Justice [236], a person may not plead infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations ‘unless he has been given precise assurances by the administration’.
Točka 1.5 pogodbe med družbama BSCA in Ryanair z dne 2. decembra 2001.
Belgium maintains that, given the lack of a complaint by the Commission in its 2004 decision, BSCA did receive precise assurances that the subsidy was not likely to constitute State aid.
Točka 4 Priloge C k pogodbi med družbama BSCA in Ryanair z dne 2. decembra 2001.
Belgium in particular relies on recital 214 of the 2004 decision, in which the Commission stated that it ‘does not dispute the legitimate possibility of the Walloon authorities continuing to bear the cost of the fire and maintenance services’.
Točka 1.6 in priloga C pogodbe med družbama BSCA in Ryanair z dne 2. decembra 2001.
It indicates that this legitimate expectation has been reinforced by the settled decision-making practice of the Commission on the distinction between economic activities and non-economic activities, as reiterated in the Commission decision on Leipzig/Halle airport.
Člen 2 pogodbe iz leta 2001.
The Commission takes the view that the lack of a complaint about the aid granted to BSCA in its 2004 decision cannot constitute a ‘precise assurance’.
Točka 3b dopisa z dne 24. junija 2004.
The Commission notes that neither the 2002 opening decision nor the 2004 final decision concerned the measures granted to BSCA.
Skupaj je v letu 2004 letališče uporabilo 2034140 potnikov (glej preglednico 1).
As regards recital 214 of the 2004 decision, the Commission stresses that this recital must be read in context.
Člena 35 in 36 odredbe z dne 3. februarja 2005 o oživitvi gospodarstva in upravni poenostavitvi.
It would appear that, in said context, the recital in question cannot be regarded as approving the measure with regard to the State aid rules, but only as explaining the reason why it is not the conformity of this measure with the State aid rules that is being examined by the Commission, but rather the uncertainty about the funding by the Region of certain services within the BSCA business plan, for the purposes of applying the market economy operator test to the 2001 contracts.
Ti določbi sta bili za letališče Charleroi preneseni z aneksom št. 4 k pogodbi o koncesiji iz leta 1991 med Valonijo in družbo BSCA, ki v členu 1 določa, da „koncesionar določi in od uporabnikov pobira letališko pristojbino za uporabo letališča, ki ga upravlja“.
As stated in recitals 397 to 399 of this decision, the Commission disputes that it can be concluded from recitals 182 and 183 of the decision on Leipzig/Halle airport that the Commission has in the past taken the view that tasks comparable to maintenance and traffic safety, as defined in the Region/BSCA agreement, fall within the public policy remit.
Dopis belgijskih organov z dne 14. julija 2011 in http://www.charleroi-airport.com/b2b/redevances-aeroportuaires/vols-regulierscharters/index.html.
Foreseeability of the change to the pattern of conduct
Pristojbine na potnika na odhodnem letu glede na podatke, predložene v odgovoru belgijskih organov z dne 14. julija 2011.
As stated by the Court of Justice [237], ‘if a prudent and alert economic operator could have foreseen the adoption of a Community measure likely to affect his interests, he cannot plead that principle if the measure is adopted [238]’.
Pri napovedih Valonije nista upoštevana letna indeksacija pristajalnih pristojbin niti povečanje števila potnikov družbe Ryanair nad 1,75 milijona; oba popravka imata nasproten učinek na dejanski znesek pristojbin na potnika, ki jih je plačevala družba Ryanair.
According to Belgium, there was nothing to indicate to BSCA that the Commission was going to re-examine, in 2012, a measure on which it had not expressed any reservations in 2004, and which the General Court did not question in 2008.
Uredba št. 1107/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. julija 2006 o pravicah invalidnih oseb in oseb z omejeno mobilnostjo v zračnem prevozu, UL L 204, 26.7.2006, str. 1.
The Commission refutes having adopted a position on the measures granted to BSCA by adopting the 2004 decision.
Ta znesek se letno indeksira, glej http://www.charleroi-airport.com/b2b/redevances-aeroportuaires/vols-regulierscharters/index.html.
As a result, the 2012 decision does not constitute a change to its pattern of conduct.
Pristojbina za potnike z omejeno mobilnostjo za leto N+1 = [0,10–0,30] EUR * Potniki družbe Ryanair v letu 2009/Potniki družbe Ryanair v letu N. Število potnikov družbe Ryanair v letu 2009 znaša 3289725.
The Commission also refutes that the present decision constitutes a change to its decision-making practice concerning the distinction between economic activities and non-economic activities.
Družba Promocy je bila skupno podjetje družb BSCA in Ryanair, ustanovljeno na podlagi sporazumov iz leta 2001.
As regards the decision on Leipzig/Halle airport cited by Belgium to prove the alleged change to the Commission's pattern of conduct, the Commission refutes that it can concluded from that decision that it has in the past taken the view that tasks comparable to maintenance and traffic safety fall within the public policy remit (see recitals 397 to 399).
Odgovor Belgije, ki ga je 18. marca 2014 poslala Komisiji in naslovila „Odgovor na zahtevo Komisije za informacije z dne 7. februarja 2014“ (odgovor na vprašanje 18).
In conclusion, the Commission takes the view that recovery of the unlawful and incompatible aid granted to BSCA is not contrary to the principle of legitimate expectations.
Družba BAC trdi, da bi zasebni vlagatelj pričakoval donos v višini najmanj 14 milijonov EUR (5 %) od naložbe v višini 281 milijonov EUR, ki jih je družba SOWAER vložila v infrastrukturo družbe BSCA.
CONCLUSION AND QUANTIFICATION OF THE AID TO BE RECOVERED FROM BSCA
Družba SOWAER pa je bila po plačilu davka od dohodkov pravnih oseb leta 2009 deležna samo 0,66-odstotnega donosa in v obdobju 2002–2007 niti Valonija niti družba SOWAER nista prejeli drugih prihodkov, na primer dividend.
Aid unlawfully granted to BSCA
Tako letni stroški amortizacije družbe BAC znašajo 30 % letnih prihodkov.
The Commission finds that, by adopting the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision, Belgium unlawfully granted aid to BSCA in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
Glej opombo 8.
This aid consists of the difference between the fee that a market economy operator would have required (hereinafter ‘the market price fee’) and the fees actually paid by BSCA to the Region-SOWAER.
Odločba 2004/393/ES, uvodna izjava 300.
The market price fee is the fee that BSCA should have paid so that each of the two measures (the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision) has a zero net present value for the Region-SOWAER.
Neposredni stroški na letalo in na obračanje za odhode z letališča Bruxelles-National, ki zajemajo pristajalne pristojbine, potniške pristojbine, druge pristojbine in stroške zemeljske oskrbe.
The Commission has determined the market price fee in line with the reasoning given in Section 6.1.2.2, which has shown that the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision resulted in a concession fee below what a market economy operator guided by profitability prospects would have required.
Na podlagi predvidenega obsega 1700000 potnikov v letu 2003 razlika v stroških znaša 23 milijonov EUR.
The Commission has taken into account that, on the signature of the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement, a prudent operator would not have required BSCA to pay a fee reflecting the investments that SOWAER undertook to make under that agreement until the investments had been made and BSCA was earning the expected revenue from those investments.
Direktiva Sveta 96/67/ES z dne 15. oktobra 1996 o dostopu do trga storitev zemeljske oskrbe na letališčih Skupnosti (UL L 272, 25.10.1996, str. 36).
A prudent operator would have agreed to the fee increasing only when the new investments could be used by the airport manager.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1882/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. septembra 2003 o prilagoditvi določb glede odborov, ki pomagajo Komisiji pri uresničevanju njenih izvedbenih pooblastil, predvidenih aktih, za katere se uporablja postopek iz člena 251 Pogodbe ES, Sklepu Sveta 1999/468/ES (UL L 284, 31.10.2003, str. 1).
Otherwise, the airport manager might experience cash flow difficulties during the years when it was not yet able to earn operating revenue from the new infrastructure.
Podjetje navaja primer družbe Shannon na Irskem.
The Commission also finds that the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement provided for an increase in the concession fee in 2007, i.e. two years after the planned commissioning of the new terminal (2005).
Družba Shannon je družbi Ryanair začasno dodelila ugodnosti, ki niso bile podaljšane.
Consequently, the Commission takes the view that a prudent operator would have agreed to BSCA paying the fee set by the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement up to two years after the end of the year of commissioning of the new terminal (i.e. in 2007), but would have required BSCA to pay a market price fee after that date, i.e. a fee allowing the entity Region-SOWAER to achieve a zero net present value over the whole period.
Družba Ryanair se je odločila, da svoje dejavnosti preseli na drugo letališče, in družba Shannon ni dosegla pričakovane razumne donosnosti naložbe.
Table 31 shows:
Sodba Sodišča z dne 22. marca 1977 v zadevi Steinike & Weinlig proti Nemčiji, 78/76; ZOdl. str. 595, EU:C:1977:52: „Morebitne kršitve obveznosti, ki jo ima država članica na podlagi Pogodbe v povezavi s prepovedjo iz člena 92, ni mogoče upravičevati z okoliščino, da naj bi tudi druge države članice kršile to obveznost; učinek različnih izkrivljanj konkurence na trgovino med državami članicami se med seboj ne izniči, temveč je, nasprotno, kumulativen, kar še povečuje njegove škodljive učinke na skupni trg“ (točka 24).
the variable concession fees expected from BSCA under the provisions in force at the time when the 2002 measure was granted [239];
Cene, ki sta jih določili letališči Frankfurt-Hahn in London Stansted, naj bi bile višje in znižanja manjša, čeprav družba Ryanair upravlja 49 destinacij z odhodi iz Londona in 15 destinacij z odhodi z letališča Frankfurt-Hahn, v primerjavi z devetimi destinacijami z odhodi z letališča Charleroi.
the additional concession fee, conceived as an annual fixed amount indexed at a rate of 2 % per year reflecting inflation [240], which BSCA should have paid from 2007 so that the concession fees payable by BSCA correspond to the market price concession fee in return for the 2002 agreements [241];
Sodba z dne 12. decembra 2000 v zadevi Aéroports de Paris proti Komisiji, T-128/98, Recueil 2000, str. II-3929, EU:C:2000:290.
the additional concession fee, conceived as an annual fixed amount indexed at a rate of 2 % per year reflecting inflation, which BSCA should have paid from 2008 so that the concession fees payable by BSCA correspond to the market price concession fee in return for the 2003 investment decision [242];(a + b + c) represents the expected market price concession fees: their amounts are such that the net present value of the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision is zero.
Sodba z dne 14. januarja 2004 v zadevi Fleuren Compost BV proti Komisiji, T-109/01, Recueil, str.
Table 31
II-00127, EU:T:2004:4, točka 18.
Expected market price concession fees
Odločba Komisije 2008/948/ES z dne 23. julija 2008 o ukrepih Nemčije v korist družbe DHL in letališča Leipzig Halle C 48/06 (ex N 227/06) (UL L 346, 23.12.2008, str. 1), uvodna izjava 291.
Concession fees expected from BSCA at the time when the 2002 measure was granted
Glej Prilogo 3 k pripombam Belgije, poslanim 23. maja 2012.
Concession fees to be added to (a) so that the NPV of the 2002 measure equals 0
Odločba 2008/948/ES uvodna izjava 182.
Concession fees to be added so that the NPV of the 2003 investment decision equals 0
Sodba z dne 24. marca 2011, Freistaat Sachsen proti Komisiji, T-443/08 in T-455/08, ZOdl.
(a + b + c) Market price concession fees
2011, str. II-01311, točka 225.
The Commission has decided that the two-year delay in the work should be covered by the Region and SOWAER, and not by BSCA, as those entities were responsible for making the investments.
Sodba z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi Altmark Trans, C-280/00, Recueil 2003, EU:C:2003:415, str. I-7447.
As a result, the Commission has taken the view that BSCA should have paid the market price concession fee from the end of 2009 only, without, however, this concession fee being increased as it should have been from the end of 2007, as stipulated by the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement.
Točka 7 člena 6(1)(X) zakona o institucionalni reformi, M.S. 15. avgust 1980, str. 9434.
It is the variable fees actually payable by BSCA (to which fees (b) and (c) shown in Table 31 should be added) that must be used to determine the market price concession fees that BSCA should have paid and that it shall pay in the future.
Zdaj Belgocontrol.
It turns out that, even though traffic has proven to be much higher than predicted in 2002, the fees actually payable (shown in column (a) of Table 32) correspond to the expected variable concession fees (shown in column (a) of Table 31) due to the cap on the variable concession fee stipulated in 2002.
M.S., 9. marec 1990, str. 4439.
Table 32 shows the elements making up the market price concession fee:
Direktiva Sveta 96/82/ES z dne 9. decembra 1996 o obvladovanju nevarnosti večjih nesreč, v katere so vključene nevarne snovi (UL L 10, 14.1.1997, str. 13), tako imenovana direktiva Seveso.
Table 32
To pa ne velja za letališča.
Market price concession fees taking into account the delay in the work [243]
Uvodna izjava 182.
More generally, beyond 2013, for example for year (2013 + n), the market price concession fee will be: (a) + (9348451 + 2640013) × (1,02)n, i.e. (a) + 11988464 × (1,02)n, where (a) is the variable part of the concession fee payable by BSCA for the year (2013 + n).
Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 2320/2002 z dne 16. decembra 2002 o določitvi skupnih pravil na področju varnosti civilnega letalstva (UL L 355, 30.12.2002, str. 1).
As explained at the end of recital 685, for the years 2014 and 2015, part (a) will probably be capped.
Člen 5(1)
In these calculations of the net present value and market price concession fee for the 2002 and 2003 measures, the Commission has assumed that there will be no cap after 2015.
Odgovor 15 iz dopisa Belgije z dne 24. februarja 2014.
From 2016, part (a) of the market price concession fee will therefore be 35 % of the aviation revenue.
Dopis, ki ga je valonska vlada odobrila 8. novembra 2000, str. 2.
Based on the assumptions and methods described above and if the concession fee paid by BSCA remains unchanged, the Commission concludes that, due to the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision, BSCA has received and will receive up to 31 December 2015 the aid amounts (excluding interest) corresponding to the sum of columns (b) and (c) in Table 32.
Odločba Komisije 2005/842/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena (UL L 312, 29.11.2005, str. 67).
These aid amounts are indicated in the following table:
Odločba Komisije z dne 28. oktobra 2009 o financiranju javnih bolnišnic, ki so del omrežja Iris, v regiji glavnega mesta Bruselj, NN 54/2009, spletišče Europa.
Table 33
Glej opombo 103.
Aid amounts received by BSCA up to 31 December 2015 — excluding interest — if the BSCA concession fee remains unchanged up to 31 December 2015
Delovni dokument služb Komisije, Pogosto zastavljena vprašanja v zvezi z Odločbo Komisije z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, in Okvira Skupnosti za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve Okvira Skupnosti za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, SEC(2007) 1516 final, str. 6.
Aid associated with the 2002 measure (excluding interest)
Uredba Sveta (ES) 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
Aid associated with the 2003 measure (excluding interest)
Glej uvodno izjavo 10 Uredbe št. 1998/2006 z dne 15. decembra 2006 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe pri pomoči de minimis (UL L 379, 28.12.2006, str. 5).
Total aid (excluding interest)
Odločba Komisije z dne 1. avgusta 2006 o smernicah v zvezi z zaključkom pomoči (2000–2006) iz strukturnih skladov, COM (2006) 3424, neobjavljena, spletišče europa.com.
As at 1 October 2014, date of this decision, BSCA has received, due to the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision, the following aid amounts [244] (excluding interest):
Sodba z dne 14. januarja 2004 v zadevi Fleuren Compost BV proti Komisiji, T-109/01, Recueil, str. II-00127, ECLI:EU:T:2004:4, točka 74.
Table 34
Sodba z dne 15. februarja 2001 v zadevi Avstrija proti Komisiji, C-99/98, ZOdl., str. I-01101, ECLI:EU:C:2001:94, točke 34, 35 in 38.
Aid amounts received by BSCA up to 30 September 2014 — excluding interest
Uvodna izjava 214 odločbe iz leta 2004.
Aid associated with the 2002 measure (excluding interest) received as at 30 September 2014
Združene zadeve Pavlov in drugi, C-180/98 do C-184/98, (Recueil 2000, ECLI:EU:C:2000:428, str. I-6451).
Aid associated with the 2003 measure (excluding interest) received as at 30 September 2014
Sodba z dne 16. junija 1987 v zadevi Komisija proti Italiji, 118/85, (Recueil 1987, str.
Total aid (excluding interest) received as at 30 September 2014
2599, ECLI:EU:C:1987:283, točka 7); Sodba z dne 18. junija 1998 v zadevi Komisija proti Italiji, C-35/96, (Recueil 1998, str. I-3851, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303, točka 36); združene zadeve Pavlov in drugi, C-180/98 do C-184/98, EU:C:2000:428, točka 75.
Given the conclusions in Section 6.3.2 on the compatibility of the aid granted to BSCA, only the difference between the market price fee — calculated according to the methods described in recitals 680 to 683 — and the fee paid by BSCA since 4 April 2014 constitutes aid to be recovered.
2008, str. II-3643, ECLI:EU:T:2008:585, točka 88.
In addition, until the concession fee payable by BSCA is increased to the level of the market price fee, BSCA will continue to receive unlawful and incompatible aid, the amounts of which shall be recovered.
Sodba z dne 17. februarja 1993 v združenih zadevah Poucet proti AGV in Pistre proti Cancava, C-159/91 in C-160/91, Recueil 1993, str. I-637, ECLI:EU:C:1993:63.
If the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased during 2014 to the level of the market price concession fee indicated in Table 32, the aid amount to be recovered — excluding interest — will be calculated according to the following formula:
Sodba z dne 12. decembra 2000 v zadevi Aéroports de Paris proti Komisiji, T-128/98, ECLI:EU:T:2000:290, Recueil 2000, str. II-3929.
Where N is the number of days between 4 April 2014 and the date on which the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased to the level of the market price concession fee,
Sodbi v zadevi SAT proti Control, C-364/92 (Recueil 1994, str. I-43, ECLI:EU:C:1994:7, točka 30), in v zadevi Selex Sistemi Integrati proti Komisiji, C-113/07 (ZOdl.
Aid amount to be recovered (excluding interest) = (N/365) × aid amount for 2014
2009, str. I-2207, ECLI:EU:C:2009:191, točka 71).
= (N/365) × EUR 12228234
Opomba 29 letaliških smernic.
If the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased during 2015 to the level of the market price concession fee indicated in Table 32, the aid amount to be recovered — excluding interest — will be calculated according to the following formula:
Glej tudi sodbo z dne 12. decembra 1996 v zadevi Compagnie nationale Air France proti Komisiji, T-358/94, Recueil 1996, str. II-2109, ECLI:EU:T:1996:194, točka 79, sodbo z dne 14. januarja 2004 v zadevi Fleuren Compost BV proti Komisiji, T-109/01, Recueil 2004, str. II-127, ECLI:EU:T:2004:4, točka 74, sodbo z dne 2. decembra 2008 v združenih zadevah Nuova Agricast Srl proti Komisiji, T-362/05 in T-363/05, Recueil 2008, ECLI:EU:T:2008:541, str. II-297, točka 80, ter sodbo z dne 30. novembra 2009 v združenih zadevah Francija in France Telecom proti Komisiji, T-427/04 in T-17/05, Recueil 2009, str. II-4315, ECLI:EU:T:2009:474, točka 321.
Where N′ is the number of days between 1 January 2015 and the date on which the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased to the level of the market price concession fee,
Glej uvodno izjavo 228 tega sklepa.
Aid amount to be recovered (excluding interest)
Glej opombo 37.
= aid amount to be recovered for 2014 (excluding interest) + aid amount to be recovered for 2015 (excluding interest)
Glej opombo 121.
= ((number of days from 4 April to 31 December 2014)/365) × aid amount for 2014 + (N′/365) × aid amount for 2015
Točka 35 letaliških smernic
= (272/365) × 12228234 + (N′/365) × 12472799
Navigacijski sistem za pomoč pri pristajanju v slabem vremenu.
= EUR 9112547 + N′ × EUR 34172
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2016/1698 z dne 20. februarja 2014 o ukrepih SA.22932 (11/C) (ex NN 37/07), ki jih je Francija izvedla v korist letališča Marseille Provence in letalskih prevoznikov, ki uporabljajo to letališče (UL L 260, 27.9.2016, str.
The Belgian authorities must recover the amount calculated in accordance with the formulas given in recitals 692 and 693 within four months of the date of notification of this decision.
1).