natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Fishing logbook of the originating vessel attached to the transport document
Prevoz ribiških proizvodov pred tehtanjem (vrste, količine v teži proizvoda, ki vključuje podmerne ribe, predstavitev, območje ulova, identifikacija izvornega plovila) (*)
Electronic transmission of the fishing logbook of the originating vessel to the flag Member State
Tehtanje ribiških proizvodov ob njihovem prihodu v namembni kraj so nadzorovali pristojni organi države članice
Other catch document attached to transport document (catch certificate)
Podatki o registriranem kupcu, dražbenem centru ali drugih organih ali osebah, odgovornih za prvo trženje ribiških proizvodov (ime, državljanstvo in naslov) (*)
Transport document received before arrival by the landing or marketing Member State
Pripombe inšpektorjev (*)
Take-over declaration details
Pripombe prevoznika (*)
Take-over cross check with landing declaration
Sprejeti ukrep(-i) (*)
Sales note or invoices details
Podpis inšpektorjev (*)
Labelling for traceability
Podpis prevoznika (*)
Sample weighing of box/containers
Obvezne informacije se zberejo in zabeležijo v podatkovno zbirko v skladu s členom 118 te uredbe.
Weighing record
Obvezne informacije se zberejo in zabeležijo v podatkovno zbirko v skladu s členom 118 te uredbe.“
Vehicle or container sealed
PRILOGA VIII
Seal details noted on the transport document
„PRILOGA XXX
Inspection authority who affixed the seals (*)
TOČKE, KI SE PRIPIŠEJO ZA HUDE KRŠITVE
Status of seals (*)
Huda kršitev
Infringements or observations (*)
Točke
Fisheries products transported before weighing (species, quantities in product weight including for undersized fish, presentation, catch area, originating vessel(s) identification) (*)
Neizpolnjevanje obveznosti glede beleženja in poročanja podatkov o ulovu ali podatkov, povezanih z ulovom, med drugim tudi podatkov, posredovanih prek satelitskega sistema za spremljanje plovil
Weighing of fisheries products observed on arrival at destination by Member State competent authorities
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
Registered buyer, auction centre or other bodies or persons responsible for the first marketing of fisheries products details (name, nationality and address) (*)
Uporaba prepovedanega orodja ali orodja, ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev v skladu z zakonodajo Unije
Inspectors' comments (*)
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
Transporter's comments (*)
Ponarejanje ali prikrivanje oznak, identitete ali registracije
Action(s) taken (*)
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
Inspectors' signature (*)
Prikrivanje, nedovoljeno spreminjanje ali uničevanje dokazov, povezanih s preiskavo
Transporter's signature (*)
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(g) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
Compulsory information to be collected and recorded in the database in accordance with Article 118 of this Regulation
Natovarjanje, pretovarjanje ali iztovarjanje podmernih rib v nasprotju z veljavno zakonodajo ali neizpolnjevanje obveznosti iztovarjanja podmernih rib
Compulsory information to be collected and recorded in the database in accordance with Article 118 of this Regulation’
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(i) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
ANNEX VIII
Izvajanje ribolovnih dejavnosti na območju regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva na način, ki ni v skladu z ukrepi te organizacije za ohranjanje in upravljanje ali jih krši
‘ANNEX XXX
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(k) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
POINTS TO BE ASSIGNED FOR SERIOUS INFRINGEMENTS
Izvajanje ribolova brez veljavnega dovoljenja za gospodarski ribolov, brez veljavnega dovoljenja za ribolov ali ribolovne karte, ki jo izda država zastave ali ustrezna obalna država
Serious infringement
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
Points
Ribolov v zaprtem območju ali v nelovni dobi, brez kvote ali po doseženi kvoti, ali pod določeno globino
Not fulfilling of obligations to record and report catch or catch related data, including data to be transmitted by satellite vessel monitoring system
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
(Article 90 paragraph 1 of the Control Regulation in conjunction with Article 42 paragraph 1(a) and Article 3 paragraph 1(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008)
Izvajanje usmerjenega ribolova staleža, za katerega velja moratorij ali prepoved ribolova
Use of prohibited or non-compliant gear according to Union legislation
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(d) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
(Article 90 paragraph 1 of the Control Regulation in conjunction with Article 42 paragraph 1(a) and Article 3 paragraph 1(e) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008)
Oviranje dela uradnikov pri izvajanju nalog pregledovanja skladnosti z veljavnimi ukrepi za ohranjanje in upravljanje ali dela opazovalcev pri izvajanju nalog opazovanja skladnosti z veljavnimi pravili Unije
Falsification or concealing of markings, identity or registration
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(h) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
(Article 90 paragraph 1 of the Control Regulation in conjunction with Article 42 paragraph 1(a) and Article 3 paragraph 1(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008)
Pretovarjanje na ribiška plovila, za katera je bilo ugotovljeno, da so izvajala ribolov IUU na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008, zlasti na tista, ki so na seznamu plovil IUU Unije ali seznamu plovil IUU, ki ga sprejmejo regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva, sodelovanje v skupnih ribolovnih operacijah s takimi plovili ali podpiranje ali oskrbovanje teh plovil
Concealing, tampering or disposal of evidence relating to an investigation
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(j) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
(Article 90 paragraph 1 of the Control Regulation in conjunction with Article 42 paragraph 1(a) and Article 3 paragraph 1(g) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008)
Uporaba ribiškega plovila brez državljanstva, ki je zato v skladu z mednarodno zakonodajo plovilo brez državne pripadnosti
Taking on board, transhipping or landing of undersized fish in contravention of the legislation in force or not fulfilling of obligations to land undersized fish
(člen 90(1) uredbe o nadzoru v povezavi s členom 42(1)(a) in členom 3(1)(l) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008)
(Article 90 paragraph 1 of the Control Regulation in conjunction with Article 42 paragraph 1(a) and Article 3 paragraph 1(i) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008)
Točka c člena 90(1) in odstavek 1 člena 92 uredbe o nadzoru, kakor ju spreminjata odstavka 14 in 15 člena 7 Uredbe (EU) 2015/812, veljata od 1. januarja 2017.
Carrying out of fishing activities in the area of a regional fisheries management organisation in a manner inconsistent with or in contravention of the conservation and management measures of that organisation
Pripis točk za hude kršitve v zvezi s temi določbami bi moral začeti veljati ob istem času.
(Article 90 paragraph 1 of the Control Regulation in conjunction with Article 42 paragraph 1(a) and Article 3 paragraph 1(k) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008)
Brez poseganja v posebna pravila za pelagične vrste iz členov 78 do 89 te uredbe, ki so iztovorjene kot razsuti tovor ter se prepeljejo do kraja prvega dajanja v promet, skladiščenja ali obdelave, odbitek vode in ledu od skupne teže ne presega 2 %.
Fishing without a valid licence, authorisation or permit issued by the flag State or the relevant coastal State
V vseh primerih se odstotek odbitka vode in ledu zabeleži na potrdilu o tehtanju skupaj z vpisom teže.
(Article 90 paragraph 1 of the Control Regulation in conjunction with Article 42 paragraph 1(a) and Article 3 paragraph 1(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 )
Člen 146d(1) se uporablja od 1. januarja 2016.
Fishing in a closed area or during a closed season, without or after attainment of a quota or beyond a closed depth
V skladu s členom 11 Uredbe (EU) 2015/812 točka 5 Priloge XXX v zvezi s hudimi kršitvami zaradi neizpolnjevanja obveznosti iztovarjanja podmernih rib velja od 1. januarja 2017.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1963
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) 2015/1963
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of acesulfame potassium originating in the People's Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz kalijevega acesulfama s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
On 22 May 2015, by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/787 (‘the provisional Regulation’), [2] the European Commission (‘the Commission’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of acesulfame potassium originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the country concerned’ or ‘the PRC’) as well as acesulfame potassium originating in the People's Republic of China contained in certain preparations and/or mixtures.
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 22. maja 2015 z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) 2015/787 („začasna uredba“) [2] uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev za uvoz kalijevega acesulfama s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („zadevna država“ ali „LRK“) in kalijevega acesulfama s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki ga vsebujejo nekateri pripravki in/ali zmesi.
The investigation was initiated on 4 September 2014 following a complaint lodged on 22 July 2014 by Celanese Sales Germany GmbH (‘the complainant’).
Preiskava se je začela 4. septembra 2014 na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 22. julija 2014 vložila družba Celanese Sales Germany GmbH („pritožnik“).
The complainant was formerly named Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GmbH until its change in name on 1 August 2015.
Pritožnik se je pred spremembo imena 1. avgusta 2015 imenoval Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GmbH.
The complainant is the sole Union producer of acesulfame potassium (or ‘Ace-K’), thus representing 100 % of the total Union production of Ace-K.
Pritožnik je edini proizvajalec kalijevega acesulfama v Uniji (tudi „Ace-K“) in tako predstavlja 100 % celotne proizvodnje Unije za Ace-K.
As set out in recital 16 of the provisional Regulation the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 (‘the investigation period’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 16 začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode zajemala obdobje od 1. julija 2013 do 30. junija 2014 („obdobje preiskave“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2011 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Proučevanje trendov, pomembnih za oceno škode, je potekalo od 1. januarja 2011 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
The complainant requested a hearing with the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings (‘Hearing Officer’).
Pritožnik je zahteval zaslišanje pri pooblaščencu za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih („pooblaščenec za zaslišanje“).
The complainant contested several aspects of the provisional determinations, in particular with regard to the adaptations made respectively in the dumping and injury margin calculations.
Komisija je vse strani obvestila o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameravala uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz Ace-K s poreklom iz LRK in dokončno pobrati zneske, zavarovane z začasno dajatvijo („dokončno razkritje“).
The Commission considered the oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties and, where appropriate, modified the provisional findings accordingly.
Za vse strani je bil določen rok, v katerem so lahko predložile pripombe k dokončnemu razkritju.
The Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of Ace-K originating in the PRC and definitively collect the amounts secured by way of provisional duty (‘the definitive disclosure’).
Na zahtevo pritožnika je 22. septembra 2015 potekalo drugo zaslišanje pri pooblaščencu za zaslišanje.
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the definitive disclosure.
Pripombe zainteresiranih strani so se proučile in, kadar je bilo primerno, upoštevale.
Upon request of the complainant, another hearing with the Hearing Officer was held on 22 September 2015.
Vzorčenje
The comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi z opustitvijo vzorčenja zaradi omejenega števila nepovezanih uvoznikov in proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, ki so se javili, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 7 do 11 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Sampling
ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
In the absence of comments concerning the abandoning of sampling in view of the limited number of unrelated importers and exporting producers in the PRC that came forward, the provisional findings in recitals 7 to 11 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Zadevni izdelek, kakor je opredeljen v uvodni izjavi 17 začasne uredbe, je kalijev acesulfam (kalijeva sol 6-metil-1,2,3-oksatiazin-4(3H)-on 2,2-dioksida); CAS RN 55589-62-3) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in kalijev acesulfam s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki ga vsebujejo nekateri pripravki in/ali zmesi, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex21069092, ex21069098, ex29349990 (oznaka TARIC 2934999021), ex38249092, ex38249093 in ex38249096.
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
Kakor je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 18, se Ace-K uporablja kot sintetično sladilo za različne namene, na primer za hrano, pijačo in farmacevtske izdelke.
The product concerned, as defined in recital 17 of the provisional Regulation, was acesulfame potassium (potassium salt of 6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide; CAS RN 55589-62-3) originating in the People's Republic of China as well as acesulfame potassium originating in the People's Republic of China contained in certain preparations and/or mixtures, currently falling within CN codes ex21069092, ex21069098, ex29349990 (TARIC code 2934999021), ex38249092, ex38249093 and ex38249096.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov so carinski organi različnih držav članic in Švice izrazili pomisleke glede težav pri izvajanju, ki jih povzročata začasna vključitev Ace-K v pripravkih in/ali zmeseh ter opredelitev zadevnega izdelka.
As explained in recital 18 of the provisional Regulation, Ace-K is used as a synthetic sweetener in a wide range of applications, for example in food, beverage, and pharmaceutical products.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se taki pripravki in/ali zmesi, ki vsebujejo Ace-K, v obdobju preiskave dejansko niso uvažali.
After imposition of provisional measures, the customs authorities of various Member States and of Switzerland expressed concerns on the implementation difficulties caused by the provisional inclusion of Ace-K in preparations and/or mixtures in the definition of the product concerned.
Ker uvoza ni bilo, je Komisija sklenila, da se pripravki in zmesi ne bi smeli vključiti v opredelitev obsega izdelka.
The investigation showed that such preparations and/or mixtures containing Ace-K were in fact not imported during the investigation period.
To pojasnilo ne vpliva na ugotovitve o dampingu, škodi, vzročnosti in interesu Unije.
The Commission concluded that due to the lack of imports, preparations and mixtures should not be included in the definition of the product scope.
Čeprav je Komisija med preiskavo ugotovila, da so določene dejavnosti povezane z razvojem ene zmesi proizvajalca Unije, je bil njihov vpliv zaradi njihovega posebnega značaja izključen iz analize že v začasni fazi.
This clarification has no bearing on the findings of dumping, injury, causation and Union interest.
Zato se pojasnilo nanaša samo na Ace-K v pripravkih in/ali zmeseh ter ne vpliva bistveno na obseg postopka ali začasne ugotovitve o dampingu in škodi.
While the Commission identified during the investigation certain activities related to the development of one mixture by the Union producer, the impact of those were excluded from the analysis already at the provisional stage due to their exceptional nature.
Glede na precejšnje težave pri izvajanju, o katerih poročajo carinski organi, morebitna tveganja glede izvrševanja v zvezi s preoblikovanjem čistih oblik Ace-K v pripravke in/ali zmesi niso upravičevala njihove vključitve.
Therefore, the clarification concerns only Ace-K in preparations and/or mixtures and does not materially affect the scope of the proceeding or the provisional findings on dumping and injury.
Vključitev pripravkov in zmesi torej ni primerna.
In view of considerable implementation difficulties reported by the customs authorities, possible enforcement risks linked to the transformation of pure forms of Ace-K into preparations and/or mixtures did not justify the inclusion thereof.
Treba bi bilo torej pojasniti, da se opredelitev zadevnega izdelka nanaša samo na kalijev acesulfam (kalijeva sol 6-metil-1,2,3-oksatiazin-4(3H)-on 2,2-dioksida); CAS RN 55589-62-3) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („izdelek v preiskavi“), ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznako KN ex29349990 (oznaka TARIC 2934999021) („zadevni izdelek“).
The inclusion of preparations and mixtures is therefore not appropriate.
Kalijev acesulfam je splošno znan tudi pod imenom acesulfam K oziroma Ace-K.
The definition of the product concerned should therefore be clarified as referring only to acesulfame potassium (potassium salt of 6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide; CAS RN 55589-62-3) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the product under investigation’) currently falling within CN code ex29349990 (TARIC code 2934999021) (‘the product concerned’).
Če so bile naložene začasne protidampinške dajatve za te pripravke in/ali zmesi, jih je treba sprostiti.
Acesulfame potassium is also commonly referred to as Acesulfame K or Ace-K.
Komisija od tretjih strani v zvezi s tem ni prejela pripomb.
Should provisional anti-dumping duties on such preparations and/or mixtures have been imposed, they should be released.
Zato se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 19 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The Commission did not receive any comments in this regard.
DAMPING
The conclusions reached in recital 19 of the provisional Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Normalna vrednost
DUMPING
Noben od kitajskih proizvajalcev Ace-K ni vložil zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“), zato njihovih domačih prodajnih cen ali proizvodnih stroškov ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za določitev normalne vrednosti.
Normal value
Med obdobjem preiskave se je Ace-K proizvajal samo v LRK in Uniji.
None of the Chinese Ace-K producers claimed market economy treatment and therefore their domestic sales prices or cost of production could not be used for establishing normal value.
Zato normalne vrednosti ni bilo mogoče določiti na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom ali cene iz takšne tretje države v drugih državah, vključno z Unijo.
During the investigation period, Ace-K was produced only in the PRC and the Union.
Zato je bilo treba v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe normalno vrednost določiti na „kateri koli drugi razumni podlagi“.
The normal value could not therefore be determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country, or the price from such a third country to other countries, including the Union.
V tem smislu je Komisija kot izhodišče za določitev normalne vrednosti uporabila cene, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo v Uniji za podobni izdelek, tj. prodajne cene industrije Unije v Uniji, ter nato to ceno prilagodila z odpravo učinka treh elementov, ki so obstajali le pri industriji Unije in so odražali posebne vzorce oblikovanja cen ter dejavnosti, povezane z zelo specifičnim in drugačnim izdelkom, ki ga je razvil pritožnik.
Consequently, pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value had to be determined on ‘any other reasonable basis’.
V preiskavi so bili glede določanja cen zadevnega izdelka, na katerega se nanaša ta zadeva, dejansko ugotovljeni posebni vzorci, ki se nanašajo na količine in vrste strank, razlike v kakovosti ter izredne stroške v zvezi z novim, zelo specifičnim in drugačnim izdelkom, ki ga je razvil le pritožnik.
To that effect, the Commission used as starting point for establishing the normal value the price actually paid or payable in the Union for the like product, i.e. the Union sales price of the Union industry, and it then adapted that price to remove the effect of three elements that existed only for the Union industry and that reflected particular patterns of price formation as well as activities related to a very specific and different product developed by the complainant.
Zato je Komisija uporabila ustrezne prilagoditve, ki odražajo te posebne vzorce, in določila normalno vrednost na razumni podlagi.
Indeed, the investigation had established in the price setting of the product concerned in the present case particular patterns relating to quantities and types of customers, quality differences as well as exceptional costs related to a new, very specific and different product developed only by the complainant.
Pritožnik je nasprotoval tem prilagoditvam njegovih cen za namen določitve normalne vrednosti, meneč da so nedopustne v skladu s pogoji iz člena 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission introduced therefore relevant adaptations to reflect those particular patterns and make the determination of the normal value on a reasonable basis.
Zgornje pripombe zahtevajo pojasnitev pristopa Komisije v primerjavi s pristopom iz začasne uredbe.
The complainant contested those adaptations to its prices for the purpose of establishing the normal value, claiming they are improper under the terms of Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Dejansko je treba v zvezi z uvodnima izjavama 26 in 27 začasne uredbe pojasniti, da so bile tri prilagoditve, opisane v uvodnih izjavah od 23 do 38, izvedene kot del določanja normalne vrednosti na „kateri koli drugi razumni podlagi“ v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
The above comments require a clarification of the Commission's approach as compared to the one described in the provisional Regulation.
Tako ni bila vprašljiva izvedba prilagoditve normalne vrednosti za primerjavo z izvozno ceno, temveč izračun normalne vrednosti na razumni podlagi v odsotnosti ustrezne tretje države s tržnim gospodarstvom, ki bi bila lahko uporabljena kot primerljiva država.
Indeed, in reference to recitals 26 and 27 of the provisional Regulation, it should be made clear that the three adaptations described below in recitals 23 to 38 have been made as part of the determination of the normal value on ‘any other reasonable basis’ under Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Dejansko so se cene industrije Unije uporabile le kot izhodišče v postopku za določitev razumne normalne vrednosti, za izračun tovrstne razumne normalne vrednosti pa so bile potrebne prilagoditve.
Thus, the question was not to perform an adjustment to a normal value for comparing with an export price, but rather to arrive at a normal value on a reasonable basis in the absence of an appropriate market economy third country which could be used as analogue country.
Trditev, da ni pravne podlage za te prilagoditve, se zato zavrne.
Indeed, the Union industry prices were used only as a starting point in the process of establishing a reasonable normal value and the adaptations were necessary to arrive at such a reasonable normal value.
Prilagoditev za raven trgovanja