natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If Member States have allowed certification of natural person verifiers pursuant to Article 54(2) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012, please indicate also the number of natural person verifiers certified for a particular scope of certification referred to in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 600/2012.
Če so države članice dovolile potrjevanje preveriteljev, ki so fizične osebe, v skladu s členom 54(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 600/2012, navedite tudi število preveriteljev, ki so fizične osebe, potrjene za določen obseg potrjevanja iz Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 600/2012.
Scope of accreditation or certification listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 600/2012
Obseg akreditacije ali potrjevanja iz Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 600/2012
Number of verifiers accredited in your Member State
Število preveriteljev, akreditiranih v vaši državi članici
Number of verifiers certified in your Member State
Število preveriteljev, potrjenih v vaši državi članici
In the table below, please provide information on the application of the requirements on information exchange specified in Chapter VI of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012
V spodnji preglednici navedite informacije o uporabi zahtev glede izmenjave informacij iz Poglavja VI Uredbe (EU) št. 600/2012.
Information on the application of information exchange requirements specified in Chapter VI of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012
Informacije o uporabi zahtev glede izmenjave informacij iz Poglavja VI Uredbe (EU) št. 600/2012
Number of verifiers accredited by a national accreditation body in another Member State that carried out verification in your Member State
Število preveriteljev, ki jih je akreditiral nacionalni akreditacijski organ v drugi državi članici, ki so izvedli preverjanje v vaši državi članici
For installations
Za naprave
For aviation
Za letalstvo
Number of verifiers certified by a national certification authority in another Member State that carried out verification in your Member State (if relevant)
Število preveriteljev, ki jih je potrdil nacionalni potrjevalni organ v drugi državi članici, ki so izvedli preverjanje v vaši državi članici
Number of administrative measures imposed on verifiers accredited by your Member State
Število upravnih ukrepov, uvedenih za preveritelje, ki jih je akreditirala vaša država članica
Withdrawal of accreditation
Odvzem akreditacije
Reduction of scope
Zmanjšanje obsega
Number of administrative measures imposed on verifiers certified by your Member State (if relevant)
Število upravnih ukrepov, uvedenih za preveritelje, ki jih je potrdila vaša država članica (če je ustrezno)
Number of times that the national accreditation body in your Member State has requested the national accreditation body in another Member State to carry out surveillance on its behalf in accordance with Article 49(5) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2012
Število primerov, v katerih je nacionalni akreditacijski organ v vaši državi članici zahteval, da nacionalni akreditacijski organ v drugi državi članici izvede nadzor v njegovem imenu v skladu s členom 49(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 600/2012
Number of complaints made about verifiers accredited by your Member State and the number that have been resolved
Število pritožb glede preveriteljev, ki jih je akreditirala vaša država članica, in število rešenih pritožb
Number of complaints made
Število vloženih pritožb
Number of complaints resolved
Število rešenih pritožb
Number of complaints made about verifiers certified by your Member State and the number that have been resolved
Število pritožb glede preveriteljev, ki jih je potrdila vaša država članica, in število rešenih pritožb
Number of outstanding non-conformities for verifiers reported in the information exchange and the number that have been resolved
Število neodpravljenih neskladnosti za preveritelje, navedenih v okviru izmenjave informacij, in število odpravljenih neskladnosti
Number of non-conformities
Število neskladnosti
Number of non-conformities resolved
Število odpravljenih neskladnosti
For which installations did the competent authority make a conservative estimation of emissions in accordance with Article 70(1) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012?
Za katere naprave je pristojni organ izvedel konservativno oceno emisij v skladu s členom 70(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012?
Installation identification code [31]
Identifikacijska oznaka naprave [31]
Total annual emissions of the installation
Skupne letne emisije naprave
Reason for making a conservative estimation [32]
Razlog za izvedbo konservativne ocene [32]
Share (in %) of emissions of the installation conservatively estimated
Delež (v %) emisij naprave, ki so bile konservativno ocenjene
Method used to conservatively estimate the emissions
Metoda, uporabljena za konservativno oceno emisij
Further action taken or proposed [33]
Sprejeti ali predlagani nadaljnji ukrepi [33]
Did any verification report include non-material misstatements, non-conformities that did not lead to a negative verification opinion statement, non-compliance with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 or recommendations for improvement?
Ali je katero koli poročilo o preverjanju vsebovalo nebistveno napačne navedbe, neskladnosti, ki niso bile razlog za negativno izjavo o mnenju pri nepreverjanju, neskladnost z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 601/2012 ali priporočila za izboljšavo?
If yes, please provide information in the table below:
Če ste odgovorili pritrdilno, navedite informacije v spodnji preglednici:
Type of issue found [34]
Vrsta ugotovljene težave [34]
Main reasons for the issue(s) found (in general) [35]
Glavni razlogi za ugotovljene težave (na splošno) [35]
Share (in %) of verified emissions reports that have led to conservative estimation of the emissions by the competent authority
Delež (v %) preverjenih poročil o emisijah, ki so bila razlog, da je pristojni organ izvedel konservativno oceno emisij
Did the competent authority carry out any checks on verified emissions reports?
Ali je pristojni organ izvedel katere koli preglede preverjenih poročil o emisijah?
If yes, please specify what checks were carried out using the table below:
Če ste odgovorili pritrdilno, v spodnji preglednici navedite, kateri pregledi so bili izvedeni:
Checks on the verified verification reports
Pregledi preverjenih poročil o preverjanju
Share of the emissions reports checked for completeness and internal consistency.
Delež poročil o emisijah, pri katerih je bil izveden pregled celovitosti in notranje skladnosti
Share of the emissions reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan
Delež poročil o emisijah, pri katerih je bil izveden pregled skladnosti z načrtom spremljanja
Share of the emissions reports that were cross-checked with allocation data
Delež poročil o emisijah, ki so bila navzkrižno pregledana s podatki o dodelitvi
Share of the emissions reports that were cross-checked with other data
Delež poročil o emisijah, ki so bila navzkrižno pregledana z drugimi podatki
Please provide information with which other data cross-checks were performed using the third column
V tretjem stolpcu navedite informacije, s katerimi so bili izvedeni navzkrižni pregledi drugih informacij.
Share of the emissions reports that were analysed in detail
Delež poročil o emisijah, ki so bila podrobno analizirana
Please provide information on the criteria used for selecting emissions reports for detailed analysis using the third column [36]
V tretjem stolpcu navedite informacije o merilih, uporabljenih pri izbiranju poročil o emisijah za podrobno analizo [36].
Number of inspections of installations that were carried out through site visits by the competent authority
Število pregledov naprav, ki jih je pristojni organ izvedel z obiski na kraju samem
Number of verified emissions reports that were rejected because of non-compliance with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012
Število preverjenih poročil o emisijah, ki so bila zavrnjena zaradi neskladnosti z Uredbo (EU) št. 601/2012
Number of verified emissions reports that were rejected because of other reasons
Število preverjenih poročil o emisijah, ki so bila zavrnjena zaradi drugih razlogov
Please indicate the reasons for rejecting the emissions reports using the third column
V tretjem stolpcu navedite razloge za zavrnitev poročil o emisijah
Action taken as a result of rejection of verified emissions reports
Sprejeti ukrep zaradi zavrnitve preverjenih poročil o emisijah
Other action taken as a consequence of checks on verified emissions reports
Drugi sprejeti ukrepi zaradi pregledov preverjenih poročil o emisijah
Have site visits been waived for installations emitting more than 25000 tonnes CO2(e) per year?
Ali so bili obiski na kraju samem za naprave, ki sprostijo več kot 25000 ton CO2(e) na leto, opuščeni?
If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of installations for which a site visit was waived under a particular condition.
Če ste odgovorili pritrdilno, v spodnji preglednici navedite število naprav, za katere so bili obiski na kraju samem opuščeni pod posebnim pogojem.
Condition for waiving site visit [37]
Pogoj za opustitev obiska na kraju samem [37]
Were site visits waived for installations with low emissions referred to in Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012?
Ali so bili obiski na kraju samem opuščeni za naprave z nizkimi emisijami iz člena 47(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012?
If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of installations for which a site visit was waived.
Če ste odgovorili pritrdilno, v spodnji preglednici, navedite število naprav, za katere so bili obiski na kraju samem opuščeni.
Total number of site visits waived for installations with low emissions
Skupno število obiskov na kraju samem, opuščenih za naprave z nizkimi emisijami
For which aircraft operators did the competent authority make a conservative estimation of emissions in accordance with Article 70(1) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012?
Za katere operaterje zrakoplovov je pristojni organ izvedel konservativno oceno emisij v skladu s členom 70(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012?
Aircraft operator identification code [38]
Identifikacijska oznaka operaterja zrakoplova [38]
Total annual emissions of the aircraft operator
Skupne letne emisije operaterja zrakoplova
Reason for making a conservative estimation [39]
Razlog za izvedbo konservativne ocene [39]
Share (in %) of emissions of the aircraft operator conservatively estimated
Delež (v %) emisij operaterja zrakoplova, ki so bile konservativno ocenjene
Further action taken or proposed [40]
Sprejeti ali predlagani nadaljnji ukrepi [40]
If yes, please provide information in the tables below for emissions and tonne-kilometre data respectively.
Če ste odgovorili pritrdilno, v spodnjih preglednicah navedite informacije za emisije in podatke o tonskih kilometrih.
Table for data related to emissions reports
Preglednica za podatke v zvezi s poročili o emisijah
Type of issue found [41]
Vrsta ugotovljene težave [41]
Main reasons for the issue(s) found (in general) [42]
Glavni razlogi za ugotovljene težave (na splošno) [42]
Table for data related to tonne-kilometre reports
Preglednica za podatke v zvezi s poročili o tonskih kilometrih
Type of issue found [43]
Vrsta ugotovljene težave [43]
Main reasons for the issue(s) found (in general) [44]
Glavni razlogi za ugotovljene težave (na splošno) [44]
If yes, please specify what checks were carried out using the tables below for emissions and tonne-kilometre data respectively.
Če ste odgovorili pritrdilno, v spodnjih preglednicah navedite, kateri pregledi so bili izvedeni za podatke o emisijah in tonskih kilometrih.
Checks on the verified emissions reports
Pregledi preverjenih poročil o emisijah
Share of the emissions reports checked for completeness and internal consistency
Delež poročil o emisijah, pri katerih je bil izveden pregled celovitosti in notranje skladnosti
Please provide information on the criteria used for selecting emissions reports for detailed analysis using the third column [45]
V tretjem stolpcu navedite informacije o merilih, uporabljenih pri izbiranju poročil o emisijah za podrobno analizo [45]
Number of inspections carried out on aircraft operators
Število pregledov, izvedenih pri operaterjih zrakoplovov
Number of verified emissions reports rejected because of non-compliance with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012
Število preverjenih poročil o emisijah, ki so bila zavrnjena zaradi neskladnosti z Uredbo (EU) št. 601/2012
Number of verified emissions reports rejected because of other reasons
Število preverjenih poročil o emisijah, ki so bila zavrnjena zaradi drugih razlogov
Checks on the tonne-kilometre reports
Pregledi poročil o tonskih kilometrih
Share of the tonne-kilometre reports checked for completeness and internal consistency
Delež poročil o tonskih kilometrih, pri katerih je bil izveden pregled celovitosti in notranje skladnosti
Share of the tonne kilometre reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan
Delež poročil o tonskih kilometrih, pri katerih je bil izveden pregled skladnosti z načrtom spremljanja
Share of the tonne kilometre reports that were cross-checked with other data
Delež poročil o tonskih kilometrih, ki so bila navzkrižno pregledana z drugimi podatki
Share of the tonne kilometre reports that were analysed in detail
Delež poročil o tonskih kilometrih, ki so bila podrobno analizirana
Please provide information on the criteria used for selecting tonne kilometre reports for detailed analysis using the third column [46]
V tretjem stolpcu navedite informacije o merilih, uporabljenih pri izbiranju poročil o tonskih kilometrih za podrobno analizo [46]
Number of verified tonne kilometre reports rejected because of non-compliance with Regulation (EU) No 601/2012
Število preverjenih poročil o tonskih kilometrih, ki so bila zavrnjena zaradi neskladnosti z Uredbo (EU) št. 601/2012
Number of verified tonne kilometre reports rejected because of other reasons
Število preverjenih poročil o tonskih kilometrih, ki so bila zavrnjena zaradi drugih razlogov
Please indicate in the reasons for rejecting the tonne-kilometre reports using the third column
V tretjem stolpcu navedite razloge za zavrnitev poročil o tonskih kilometrih
Action taken as a consequence of checks on verified tonne-kilometre reports
Sprejeti ukrepi zaradi pregledov preverjenih poročil o tonskih kilometrih
Were site visits waived for small emitters referred to in Article 54(1) of Regulation (EU) No 601/2012?
Ali so bili obiski na kraju samem opuščeni za male onesnaževalce iz člena 54(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 601/2012?
If yes, please indicate in the table below the number of small emitters for which a site visit was waived.
Če ste odgovorili pritrdilno, v spodnji preglednici navedite število malih onesnaževalcev, za katere so bili obiski na kraju samem opuščeni.
Total number of site visits waived for small emitters
Skupno število obiskov na kraju samem, opuščenih za male onesnaževalce
Registries
registri
Please attach a copy of your Member State specific terms and conditions required to be signed by account holders.
Priložite izvod posebnih pogojev države članice, ki jih morajo podpisati imetniki računov.
In all cases where an account was closed because there was no reasonable prospect of further allowances being surrendered by an installation or aircraft operator, please describe in the table below why there was no reasonable further prospect and state the amount of outstanding allowances.
Za vse primere, v katerih je bil račun zaprt, ker ni bilo utemeljenih možnosti za nadaljnje pravice, ki bi jih predal upravljavec naprave ali operater zrakoplova, v spodnji preglednici opišite, zakaj teh možnosti ni bilo, in navedite znesek neporabljenih pravic.
Installation/operator identification code [47]
Identifikacijska oznaka naprave/operaterja zrakoplova [47]
Operator Name
Ime upravljavca
Number of allowances outstanding
Število neporabljenih pravic
Reason for no reasonable further prospect
Razlog za neobstoj utemeljenih nadaljnjih možnosti
On how many occasions during the reporting year did aircraft operators use the mandate as provided for in Article 17(3) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 [48]?
Kolikokrat so operaterji zrakoplovov v letu poročanja uporabili pooblastilo iz člena 17(3) Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 389/2013 [48]?
Please specify below the number of occasions.
Navedite število teh primerov.
Number of occasions that the mandate was used during the reporting period
Število primerov, v katerih je bilo v obdobju poročanja uporabljeno pooblastilo
Which aircraft operators used a mandate during the reporting period as provided for in Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 389/2013?
Kateri operaterji zrakoplovov so v obdobju poročanja uporabili pooblastilo iz člena 17(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 389/2013?
Please provide the information by using the table below.
Informacije navedite v spodnji preglednici.
Aircraft operator identification code [49]
Identifikacijska oznaka operaterja zrakoplova [49]
Aircraft operator name
Ime operaterja zrakoplova
Allocation
Dodelitev pravic
In the table below, please specify the number of changes that occurred to installations and their allocation since the start of the third trading period and during the reporting period.
V spodnji preglednici navedite število sprememb, do katerih je prišlo pri napravah in njihovi dodelitvi od začetka tretjega tržnega obdobja in v obdobju poročanja.
During the reporting period
V obdobju poročanja
Since the start of third trading period
Od začetka tretjega tržnega obdobja
Reason for the change in the allocation
Razlog za spremembo pri dodelitvi
Number of changes in the reporting period
Število sprememb v obdobju poročanja
Quantity of emission allowances corresponding to all changes in the reporting period
Količina pravic do emisij, ki ustreza vsem spremembam v obdobju poročanja
Number of changes since the start of the third trading period
Število sprememb od začetka tretjega tržnega obdobja
Quantity of emission allowances corresponding to all changes since the start of the third trading period
Količina pravic do emisij, ki ustreza vsem spremembam od začetka tretjega tržnega obdobja
Allocation to new installations or new sub-installations as referred to in Article 19 of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU (OJ L 130, 17.5.2011, p. 1)
Dodelitve pravic novim napravam ali novim podnapravam iz člena 19 Sklepa Komisije 2011/278/EU (UL L 130, 17.5.2011, str. 1)
Significant capacity extensions as referred to in Article 20 of Decision 2011/278/EU
Bistveno povečanje zmogljivosti iz člena 20 Sklepa 2011/278/EU
Cessation as referred to in Article 22(1)(a) — (d) of Decision 2011/278/EU
Prenehanje iz člena 22(1)(a) do (d) Sklepa 2011/278/EU
Cessation as referred to in Article 22(1)(e) of Decision 2011/278/EU
Prenehanje iz člena 22(1)(e) Sklepa 2011/278/EU
Significant capacity reductions as referred to in Article 21 of Decision 2011/278/EU
Bistveno zmanjšanje zmogljivosti iz člena 21 Sklepa 2011/278/EU
Partial cessation as referred to in Article 23 of Decision 2011/278/EU
Delno prenehanje iz člena 23 Sklepa 2011/278/EU
Were any planned or effective changes to the capacity, activity levels or operation of an installation, as referred to in Article 24 of Decision 2011/278/EU, not notified to the competent authority?
Ali katera koli od načrtovanih ali že izvedenih sprememb zmogljivosti, ravni dejavnosti in obratovanja naprave iz člena 24 Sklepa 2011/278/EU ni bila prijavljena pristojnemu organu?
If yes, please specify in the table below how many installations it concerned and how these changes were identified.
Če ste odgovorili pritrdilno, v spodnji preglednici navedite, koliko naprav so zadevale in kako so bile te spremembe ugotovljene.
Number of installations that did not notify planned of effective changes
Število naprav, ki niso prijavile načrtovanih ali že izvedenih sprememb
How the planned or effective changes were identified
Kako so bile načrtovane ali že izvedene spremembe ugotovljene
Have you applied Article 10c of Directive 2003/87/EC?
Ali ste uporabili člen 10c Direktive 2003/87/ES?
If yes, please provide in the table below the total number of emission allowances issued and the total value of investments made under Article 10c of Directive 2003/87/EC in the reporting period?
Če ste odgovorili pritrdilno, v spodnji preglednici navedite skupno število izdanih pravic do emisije in skupno vrednost naložb, ki so bile v obdobju poročanja izvedene v skladu s členom 10c Direktive 2003/87/ES.
Within the reporting period
V obdobju poročanja
Total number of emission allowances issued under Article 10c of Directive 2003/87/EC
Skupno število pravic do emisij, izdanih na podlagi člena 10c Direktive 2003/87/ES
Total value of investments under Article 10c of Directive 2003/87/EC
Skupna vrednost naložb v skladu s členom 10c Direktive 2003/87/ES
Use of emission reduction units (ERUs) and certified emission reduction (CERs) in the Community scheme
Enote zmanjševanja emisij (EZE) in potrjena zmanjšanja emisij (PZE) v shemi Skupnosti
Question 9.1 is to be answered in the report due by 30 June 2014 and in subsequent reports if changes have occurred during the reporting period.
Na vprašanje 9.1 je treba odgovoriti v poročilu, ki ga je treba oddati do 30. junija 2014, v naslednjih poročilih pa le, če je v obdobju poročanja prišlo do sprememb.
What measures have been taken, prior to issuing a letter of approval for a project, to ensure that relevant international criteria and guidelines, including those contained in the year 2000 Final Report of the World Commission on Dams (WCD), will be respected during the development of hydro-electric power production projects with a generating capacity exceeding 20 MW?
Kateri ukrepi so bili pred objavo pisma o odobritvi projekta sprejeti za zagotovitev, da bodo pomembna mednarodna merila in smernice, vključno s tistimi v končnem poročilu Svetovne komisije za jezove za leto 2000, upoštevani v času razvoja proizvodnih projektov hidroelektrarn, ki presegajo kapaciteto 20 MW?
Measures taken to ensure that relevant international criteria and guidelines, including those contained in the Final report of the WCD, have been respected
Ukrepi, sprejeti za zagotovitev, da bodo pomembna mednarodna merila in smernice, vključno s tistimi v končnem poročilu Svetovne komisije za jezove, upoštevani.
Project participants are legally obliged to adhere to relevant international criteria and guidelines, including those contained in the World Commission on Dams November 2000 Report “Dams and Development — A New Framework for Decision-Making”
Projektni udeleženci so pravno zavezani k spoštovanju pomembnih mednarodnih meril in smernic, vključno s tistimi iz Poročila Svetovne komisije za jezove iz novembra 2000: ‚Jezovi in razvoj. Nov okvir za odločanje‘.
Adherence to relevant international criteria and guidelines, including those contained in the World Commission on Dams November 2000 Report “Dams and Development — A New Framework for Decision-Making” is verified.
Preverjeno je spoštovanje pomembnih mednarodnih meril in smernic, vključno z merili in smernicami iz Poročila Svetovne komisije za jezove iz novembra 2000: ‚Jezovi in razvoj. Nov okvir za odločanje‘.
If yes, please specify the relevant authority, e.g. competent authority or designated national authority (DNA) using the comments column
Če ste odgovorili pritrdilno, v stolpcu za opombe navedite ustrezen organ, npr. pristojni organ ali pristojni nacionalni organ.
In approving hydroelectric power production project activities with a generating capacity exceeding 20 MW, the DNA or another relevant authority is required to adhere to a set of harmonised guidelines on the application of Article 11b(6) of Directive 2003/87/EC, agreed to by Member States at the Climate Change Committee
Pri potrjevanju projektnih dejavnosti za proizvodnjo električne energije v hidroelektrarnah s splošno zmogljivostjo nad 20 MW mora nacionalni pristojni organ ali drug ustrezen organ spoštovati sklop usklajenih smernic za uporabo člena 11b(6) Direktive 2003/87/ES, o katerih so se dogovorile države članice v okviru odbora za podnebne spremembe
Project proponents have to submit a validated Article 11b(6) compliance report in line with the harmonised guidelines.
Predlagatelji projekta morajo v skladu z usklajenimi smernicami predložiti potrjeno poročilo o skladnosti s členom 11b(6).
If yes, please provide relevant documents or web-links using the comments column
Če ste odgovorili pritrdilno, v stolpcu z opombami navedite ustrezne dokumente ali spletne povezave.