natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, special measures may be undertaken, for example following a major nuclear accident, where necessary and appropriate.
Vendar se lahko – če je to potrebno in ustrezno – izvedejo posebni ukrepi, na primer po hudi jedrski nesreči.
A common understanding and a reciprocal agreement between the third country and the Community should be confirmed through a formal request to the Commission, committing the respective Government.
S formalno zahtevo, ki se vloži pri Komisiji, bi bilo treba potrditi skupni dogovor in meddržavno pogodbo med tretjo državo in Skupnostjo, ki zavezuje zadevno vlado.
Third countries wishing to cooperate with the Community should fully subscribe to the principles of non-proliferation.
Tretje države, ki želijo sodelovati s Skupnostjo, bi se morale v celoti zavezati načelom neširjenja jedrskega orožja.
They should also be parties to the relevant Conventions, within the framework of the IAEA, on nuclear safety, such as the 1994 Convention on Nuclear Safety and the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, or have taken steps demonstrating a firm undertaking to accede to such Conventions.
Prav tako bi morale postati pogodbenice zadevnih konvencij MAAE o jedrski varnosti, kot sta Konvencija o jedrski varnosti in Skupna konvencija o varnem ravnanju z izrabljenim gorivom in varnem ravnanju z radioaktivnimi odpadki, ali sprejeti ukrepe, ki dokazujejo njihovo trdno zavezanost pristopu k tovrstnim konvencijam.
This commitment should be evaluated annually and, on the basis of that evaluation, a decision will be taken with regard to the continuation of the cooperation.
To zavezanost bi bilo treba oceniti vsako leto; na podlagi te ocene pa se sprejme odločitev o nadaljevanju sodelovanja.
Cooperation with the Community could be made conditional on accession to or the completion of steps towards accession to the relevant Conventions.
Pristop k ustreznim konvencijam ali sprejetje potrebnih ukrepov za pristop k njim bi lahko bil pogoj za sodelovanje s Skupnostjo.
In cases of emergency, flexibility should, exceptionally, be shown in the application of those principles.
V izrednih razmerah bi bilo treba navedena načela izjemoma prožno uporabljati.
In order to ensure and to monitor compliance with the cooperation objectives of this Regulation, the third country concerned shall accept the evaluation of the actions undertaken.
Za zagotovitev in spremljanje skladnosti s cilji sodelovanja iz te uredbe zadevna tretja država sprejme ocenjevanje sprejetih ukrepov.
This evaluation should allow the monitoring and verification of compliance with the agreed objectives and could be a condition for continued payment of the Community contribution.
To ocenjevanje naj bi omogočilo spremljanje in preverjanje skladnosti z dogovorjenimi cilji in bi lahko bilo pogoj za nadaljnje izplačevanje prispevka Skupnosti.
Cooperation provided by the Union in the field of nuclear safety and safeguards under this Regulation is not aimed at promoting nuclear energy and should therefore not be interpreted as a measure to promote that energy source in third countries.
Sodelovanje, ki ga na področju jedrske varnosti in nadzornih ukrepov v skladu s to uredbo zagotavlja Unija, ni namenjeno spodbujanju jedrske energije, zato se ga ne bi smelo razumeti kot ukrep za spodbujanje tega vira energije v tretjih državah.
In order to create the safety conditions necessary to eliminate hazards to the life and health of the public, cooperation shall be directed primarily at the nuclear regulators and their technical support organisations.
Da se vzpostavijo varnostne razmere, potrebne za odpravo nevarnosti za življenje in zdravje prebivalstva, je sodelovanje v prvi vrsti usmerjeno k jedrskim regulatorjem in njihovim organizacijam za tehnično podporo.
The objective of such cooperation is to ensure their technical competence and independence and the reinforcement of the regulatory framework, in particular with regard to licensing activities, including the review and follow up of effective and comprehensive risk and safety assessments (‘stress tests’).
Cilj takega sodelovanja je zagotoviti njihovo tehnično usposobljenost in neodvisnost ter okrepiti regulativni okvir, zlasti glede dejavnosti izdaje dovoljenj, vključno s pregledovanjem in spremljanjem učinkovitih in celovitih ocen tveganj in varnosti („testi odpornosti“).
Other priorities of the cooperation programmes to be developed within the framework of this Regulation shall include:
Druge prednostne naloge programov sodelovanja, ki jih je treba razviti v okviru te uredbe, vključujejo:
the development and implementation of responsible strategies and frameworks for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste;
oblikovanje in izvajanje odgovornih strategij in okvirov za odgovorno in varno ravnanje z izrabljenim gorivom in radioaktivnimi odpadki;
the decommissioning of existing installations, the remediation of former nuclear sites and legacy sites related to uranium mining, as well as the recovery and management of sunken radioactive objects and material at sea, when these constitute a danger to the public.
razgradnjo obstoječih objektov, sanacijo nekdanjih jedrskih območij in zapuščenih območij rudarjenja urana ter dvigovanje radioaktivnih predmetov in snovi, potopljenih v morju, ter ravnanje z njimi, če so nevarni za prebivalstvo.
Cooperation with third countries' operators of nuclear power plants shall be considered in the specific cases set out in Articles 2 and 3, in particular in the framework of follow-up measures of a comprehensive risk and safety assessment.
Sodelovanje z upravljavci jedrskih elektrarn iz tretjih držav se preuči v posebnih primerih, navedenih v členih 2 in 3, zlasti v okviru nadaljnjih ukrepov na podlagi celovite ocene tveganj in varnosti.
Such cooperation shall exclude supply of equipment.
Takšno sodelovanje ne zajema dobave opreme.
Countries with installed nuclear generating capacity
Države z nameščenimi zmogljivostmi za proizvodnjo jedrske energije
In the case of countries which have already benefited from Community financing, additional cooperation should depend on the evaluation of actions funded by the Community and on the proper justification of new needs.
Dodatno sodelovanje z državami, ki so že prejele finančna sredstva Skupnosti, bi moralo biti odvisno od ocene ukrepov, ki jih je financirala Skupnost, in od ustrezne utemeljitve novih potreb.
The evaluation should make it possible to determine more precisely the nature of the cooperation and the amounts to be granted to those countries in the future.
Z ocenjevanjem bi bilo treba natančneje določiti naravo sodelovanja in zneske, ki naj bi se v prihodnosti namenili tem državam.
In the case of countries requiring cooperation, consideration should be given to:
V zvezi z državami, ki zahtevajo sodelovanje, bi bilo treba razmisliti o:
the degree of urgency of intervention in a given country, in the light of the situation as regards nuclear safety; and
stopnji nujnosti posredovanja v dani državi ob upoštevanju situacije glede jedrske varnosti in
the significance of stepping in at the appropriate moment so as to ensure that a nuclear safety culture is fostered, in particular as regards the deployment or strengthening of the regulatory authorities and technical support organisations and the development and implementation of strategies and frameworks for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
pomenu posredovanja v primernem trenutku, da se zagotovi spodbujanje kulture jedrske varnosti, zlasti kar zadeva vzpostavitev ali okrepitev regulativnih organov in organizacij za tehnično podporo ter oblikovanje in izvajanje strategij in okvirov za odgovorno in varno ravnanje z izrabljenim gorivom in radioaktivnimi odpadki.
The use of the Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) and the IAEA Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) missions would be viewed favourably, although this would not constitute a formal criterion for cooperation.
Uporaba misij integrirane regulativne revizijske službe (IRRS – Integrated Regulatory Review Service) in revizijske skupine za operativno varnost pri MAAE (OSRT – Operational Safety Review Team) bi bila priporočljiva, čeprav to ne bi bilo formalno merilo za sodelovanje.
Countries without installed nuclear generating capacity
Države brez nameščenih zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo jedrske energije
In the case of countries which have nuclear installations as defined in Article 3(1) of Directive 2009/71/Euratom, but do not wish to develop nuclear generating capacity, cooperation shall depend on the degree of urgency in the light of the situation as regards nuclear safety.
Sodelovanje z državami, ki imajo jedrske objekte, kot so opredeljeni v členu 3(1) Direktive 2009/71/Euratom, vendar ne želijo razviti zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo jedrske energije, bo odvisno od stopnje nujnosti ob upoštevanju situacije glede jedrske varnosti.
In the case of countries that wish to develop nuclear generating capacity, whether or not they have nuclear installations as defined in Article 3(1) of Directive 2009/71/Euratom, and for which the issue arises of intervention at the appropriate moment to ensure that a nuclear safety culture is fostered in parallel with the development of the nuclear generating programme, especially as regards strengthening the regulatory authorities and technical support organisations, cooperation shall take into account the credibility of the nuclear power development programme, the existence of a government decision on the use of nuclear energy and the drawing up of a preliminary road map, which should take into account the Milestones in the Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power (IAEA Nuclear Energy Series Document NG-G-3.1).
V primeru držav, ki želijo razviti zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo jedrske energije, če imajo jedrske objekte, kot so opredeljeni v členu 3(1) Direktive 2009/71/Euratom, ali ne, in v katerih se zastavlja vprašanje posredovanja v primernem trenutku, da se zagotovi spodbujanje kulture jedrske varnosti vzporedno z razvojem programa za proizvodnjo jedrske energije, zlasti kar zadeva okrepitev regulativnih organov in organizacij za tehnično podporo, se pri sodelovanju upoštevajo izvedljivost programa razvoja zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo jedrske energije, obstoj vladnega sklepa glede uporabe jedrske energije in priprava predhodnega načrta, v katerem naj se upoštevajo mejniki v razvoju nacionalne infrastrukture za jedrsko energijo (dokument MAAE iz serije o jedrski energiji, št. NG-G-3.1).
For countries in this category, cooperation should be primarily aimed at developing the required regulatory infrastructure, the technical competence of the nuclear regulator and the respective technical support organisation(s).
Sodelovanje z državami v tej kategoriji bi moralo biti v prvi vrsti namenjeno razvoju zahtevane regulativne infrastrukture, tehnične usposobljenosti jedrskega regulatorja in vzpostavitvi ustreznih organizacij za tehnično podporo.
The development of strategies and frameworks for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste should also be considered and, if appropriate, supported, including in countries which do not envisage developing or have decided not to develop nuclear generating capacity.
Prav tako bi bilo treba razmisliti o oblikovanju strategij in okvirov za odgovorno in varno ravnanje z izrabljenim gorivom ter radioaktivnimi odpadki, ter ga po potrebi podpreti, tudi v državah, ki ne načrtujejo razvoja zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo jedrske energije ali ki so se odločile, da tovrstnih zmogljivosti ne bodo razvijale.
In the case of countries which do not fall in the above categories, cooperation may be provided in the case of emergency situations as regards nuclear safety.
Sodelovanje z državami, ki ne spadajo v zgornje kategorije, se lahko zagotavlja v izrednih razmerah, povezanih z jedrsko varnostjo.
Those countries should be able to benefit from a certain degree of flexibility in the application of the general criteria.
Za te države bi se morala splošna merila uporabljati razmeroma prožno.
The Commission should coordinate its cooperation with third countries with organisations pursuing similar objectives, in particular international organisations, including in particular the IAEA.
Komisija bi morala svoje sodelovanje s tretjimi državami usklajevati z organizacijami, ki se zavzemajo za podobne cilje, predvsem z mednarodnimi organizacijami, vključno zlasti z MAAE.
That coordination should enable the Community and the organisations concerned to avoid any duplication of actions and funding in relation to third countries.
To usklajevanje bi moralo Skupnosti in zadevnim organizacijam omogočiti, da se izognejo podvajanju ukrepanja in financiranja v zvezi s tretjimi državami.
The Commission should also involve the competent authorities of Member States and European operators in the fulfilment of its task, thereby harnessing the quality of European expertise in the field of nuclear safety and safeguards.
Komisija bi morala v izpolnjevanje svoje naloge vključiti pristojne organe držav članic in evropske upravljavce, s čimer bi izkoristila kakovost evropskega strokovnega znanja na področju jedrske varnosti in nadzornih ukrepov.
The Commission shall ensure that there is no duplication between the cooperation in the field of safeguards, through the measures which may be undertaken in accordance with Article 3(3) of this Regulation, and cooperation which may take place in the fields of security and non-proliferation under the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace.
Komisija zagotovi, da ni podvajanja med sodelovanjem na področju nadzornih ukrepov, in sicer prek ukrepov, ki se lahko izvajajo v skladu s členom 3(3) te uredbe, ter sodelovanjem, ki lahko poteka na področjih varnosti in neširjenja jedrskega orožja v okviru instrumenta, ki prispeva k stabilnosti in miru.
The criteria are to take into account the Council Conclusions on assistance to third countries in the field of nuclear safety and security (2913th Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council meeting, Brussels, 9 December 2008).
Pri merilih se upoštevajo sklepi Sveta o pomoči tretjim državam na področju jedrske varnosti in zaščite (2913. srečanje Sveta za promet, telekomunikacije in energijo v Bruslju z dne 9. decembra 2008).
The objective set out in point 3 of Article 2 shall be limited to the technical aspects that ensure that ores, source material and special fissile material are not diverted from their intended uses as declared by the users.
Cilj iz točke 3 člena 2 je omejen na tehnične vidike, s čimer se zagotovi, da se rude, izvorne snovi in posebne cepljive snovi uporabljajo le za načrtovane namene, ki jih navedejo uporabniki.
It shall be pursued through, in particular, the following measures:
Uresničuje se zlasti z naslednjimi ukrepi:
Multiannual indicative programmes shall set out the priority areas selected for financing, the specific objectives, the expected results, the performance indicators and the indicative financial allocations, both overall and per priority area, and including a reasonable reserve of unallocated funds.
V večletnih okvirnih programih se določijo prednostna področja, izbrana za financiranje, posebni cilji, pričakovani rezultati, kazalniki uspešnosti in okvirne finančne dodelitve – skupno in po prednostnih področjih – ter znatna rezerva nedodeljenih sredstev.
This may be given in the form of a range or a minimum, where appropriate.
Izrazijo se lahko v razponu vrednosti ali po potrebi kot najmanjši zneski.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 238/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 238/2014
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 239/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 239/2014
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 240/2014
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 240/2014
on the European code of conduct on partnership in the framework of the European Structural and Investment Funds
o Evropskem kodeksu dobre prakse za partnerstvo v okviru evropskih strukturnih in investicijskih skladov
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 [1], and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o skupnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu, Evropskem kmetijskem skladu za razvoj podeželja in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo, o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu, Kohezijskem skladu in Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 [1] in zlasti člena 5(3) Uredbe,
The aim of this Regulation is to provide for a European code of conduct in order to support and facilitate Member States in the organisation of partnerships for Partnership Agreements and programmes supported by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF), the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF).
Cilj te uredbe je zagotoviti Evropski kodeks dobre prakse za podporo in pomoč državam članicam pri organiziranju partnerstev za partnerske sporazume in programe, ki se financirajo s sredstvi Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj (ESRR), Evropskega socialnega sklada (ESS), Kohezijskega sklada, Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) in Evropskega sklada za pomorstvo in ribištvo (EMFF).
These funds now operate under a common framework and are referred to as the ‘European Structural and Investment Funds (hereinafter ‘the ESI Funds’).
Ti skladi zdaj delujejo v skupnem okviru in se imenujejo „evropski strukturni in investicijski skladi“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skladi ESI).
Working in partnership is a long-established principle in the implementation of the ESI Funds.
Partnersko sodelovanje je že dolgo uveljavljeno načelo pri izvajanju skladov ESI.
Partnership implies close cooperation between public authorities, economic and social partners and bodies representing civil society at national, regional and local levels throughout the whole programme cycle consisting of preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.
Partnerstvo pomeni tesno sodelovanje med javnimi organi, ekonomskimi in socialnimi partnerji ter telesi, ki predstavljajo civilno družbo, na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni v celotnem programskem ciklu, ki ga sestavljajo priprava, izvajanje, spremljanje in vrednotenje.
The partners selected should be the most representative of the relevant stakeholders.
Izbrani partnerji morajo biti najbolj reprezentativni od ustreznih deležnikov.
Selection procedures should be transparent and take into account the different institutional and legal frameworks of the Member States and their national and regional competences.
Izbirni postopki bi morali biti pregledni in upoštevati različne institucionalne in pravne okvire držav članic ter njihove nacionalne in regionalne pristojnosti.
The partners should include public authorities, economic and social partners and bodies representing civil society, including environmental partners, community-based and voluntary organisations, which can significantly influence or be significantly affected by implementation of the Partnership Agreement and programmes.
Partnerji bi morali vključevati javne organe, ekonomske in socialne partnerje ter telesa, ki predstavljajo civilno družbo, vključno z okoljskimi partnerji, organizacijami lokalnih skupnosti in prostovoljnimi organizacijami, kar lahko znatno vpliva na oziroma na kar bi lahko znatno vplivalo izvajanje partnerskih sporazumov in programov.
Specific attention should be paid to including groups who may be affected by programmes but who find it difficult to influence them, in particular the most vulnerable and marginalised communities, which are at highest risk of discrimination or social exclusion, in particular persons with disabilities, migrants and Roma people.
Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti tudi skupinam, na katere lahko programi vplivajo, vendar ki težko vplivajo na programe, predvsem najbolj ranljivim in marginaliziranim skupnostim, ki jim najbolj grozi diskriminacija ali socialna izključenost, zlasti invalidom, migrantom in Romom.
For the selection of partners, it is necessary to take into account the differences between Partnership Agreements and programmes.
Pri izbiri partnerjev je treba upoštevati razlike med partnerskimi sporazumi in programi.
Partnership Agreements cover all the ESI Funds providing support to each Member State, while programmes refer only to the ESI Funds contributing to them.
Partnerski sporazumi zajemajo vse sklade ESI, ki zagotavljajo podporo vsaki od držav članic, programi pa se nanašajo samo na sklade ESI, ki vanje prispevajo.
The partners for Partnership Agreements should be those relevant in view of the planned use of all the ESI Funds, while for programmes it is sufficient that the partners are those relevant in view of the planned use of the ESI Funds contributing to the programme.
Partnerji za partnerske sporazume bi morali biti tisti, ki so pomembni glede na načrtovano uporabo vseh skladov ESI, za programe pa zadošča, da so partnerji pomembni z vidika načrtovane uporabe skladov ESI, ki prispevajo v program.
The partners should be involved in preparing and implementing Partnership Agreements and programmes.
Partnerji bi morali sodelovati pri pripravi in izvajanju partnerskih sporazumov in programov.
For this purpose, it is necessary to establish main principles and good practices concerning timely, meaningful and transparent consultation of the partners on the analysis of challenges and needs to be tackled, the selection of objectives and priorities to address them, and the coordination structures and multi-level governance agreements necessary for effective policy delivery.
Zato je treba določiti glavna načela in dobre prakse glede pravočasnega, smiselnega in preglednega posvetovanja med partnerji o analizi obstoječih izzivov in potreb, izbiri ciljev in prednostnih nalog za njihovo obravnavo ter usklajevalnih strukturah in sporazumih o upravljanju na več ravneh, ki so potrebni za učinkovito izvajanje politik.
The partners should be represented on the monitoring committees of programmes.
Partnerji bi morali biti zastopani v odborih za spremljanje programov.
The rules governing membership and committee procedures should promote continuity and ownership of programming and implementation, and working arrangements that are clear and transparent, as well as timeliness and non-discrimination.
Pravila, ki urejajo sestavo in postopke odbora, bi morala spodbujati kontinuiteto in odgovornost nad načrtovanjem in izvajanjem ter delovne dogovore, ki so jasni in pregledni, kot tudi pravočasnost in nediskriminacijo.
Through their active participation in the monitoring committees, the partners should be involved in assessing performance on the different priorities, the relevant reports on the programmes and, where appropriate, calls for proposals.
Partnerji bi morali biti z aktivno udeležbo v nadzornih odborih vključeni v ocenjevanje učinkovitosti pri različnih prednostnih nalogah, ustrezno poročanje o programih in, če je primerno, pozive k oddaji predlogov.
Effective partnership should be facilitated by helping the relevant partners to strengthen their institutional capacity in view of the preparation and implementation of programmes.
Uspešno partnerstvo bi se moralo spodbujati tako, da bi se ustreznim partnerjem pomagalo okrepiti njihove institucionalne zmogljivosti za pripravo in izvajanje programov.