natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The oral and written comments submitted by the eight third countries following the Decision of 15 November 2012 were considered and taken into account.
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije, v katerem se Šrilanka opredeli kot tretja država, ki jo Komisija obravnava kot nesodelujočo pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu, ima posledice iz člena 18(1)(g) uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
The eight countries were kept informed either orally or in writing of the Commission's considerations.
POSTOPEK V ZVEZI S ŠRILANKO
The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (Sri Lanka) failed to refute the facts invoked by the Commission or to implement the plan of action to rectify the situation.
Komisija je 15. novembra 2012 v skladu s členom 32 uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova uradno obvestila Šrilanko, da preučuje možnost, da bo Šrilanko opredelila kot nesodelujočo tretjo državo [3].
This Commission Implementing Decision identifying Sri Lanka as a third country that the Commission considers as non-cooperating in fighting IUU fishing is the result of an investigation and dialogue process in the context of the implementation of the IUU Regulation.
Komisija je Šrilanko pozvala, naj v tesnem sodelovanju z njenimi službami pripravi akcijski načrt za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih v sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012.
That process complied with the substantive and procedural requirements laid out in that Regulation, which refers, inter alia, to the third country's duties incumbent upon it under international law as flag, port, coastal or market State to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing.
Glavne pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je Komisija ugotovila v predlaganem akcijskem načrtu, so se nanašale na več pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju obveznosti mednarodnega prava, predvsem v zvezi s sprejetjem ustreznega pravnega okvira, pomanjkanjem ustreznega in učinkovitega spremljanja, pomanjkanjem opazovalnega programa, odsotnostjo sistema odvračilnih sankcij ter nepravilnim izvajanjem sistema potrdil o ulovu.
The Commission Implementing Decision to identify Sri Lanka as a third country that the Commission considers as a non-cooperating third country in fighting IUU fishing entails the consequences stated in Article 18(1)(g) of the IUU Regulation.
Druge ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti se na splošno nanašajo na izpolnjevanje mednarodnih obveznosti, vključno s priporočili in resolucijami regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribolova.
PROCEDURE WITH RESPECT TO SRI LANKA
Ugotovljena je bila tudi neskladnost s priporočili in resolucijami ustreznih organov, kot je mednarodni akcijski načrt Združenih narodov za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
On 15 November 2012, the Commission notified Sri Lanka pursuant to Article 32 of the IUU Regulation that it considered the possibility of identifying Sri Lanka as a non-cooperating third country [3].
Vendar se pomanjkanje skladnosti z nezavezujočimi priporočili in resolucijami obravnava samo kot dodaten dokaz in ne kot podlaga za opredelitev.
The Commission invited Sri Lanka to establish in close cooperation with its services an action plan to rectify the shortcomings identified in its Decision of 15 November 2012.
Šrilanka je s predložitvijo dopisa z dne 14. decembra 2012 Komisijo obvestila o institucionalnih ureditvah, ki so bile uvedene za obravnavo pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih v predlaganem akcijskem načrtu.
The main shortcoming identified by Commission in the suggested plan of action were related to several failures to implement international law obligations, linked in particular to the adoption of an adequate legal framework, lack of adequate and efficient monitoring, lack of observer scheme, lack of a deterrent sanctioning system, and to improper implementation of the catch certification scheme.
Šrilanka je pisne pripombe predložila 31. decembra 2012 in 4. januarja 2013.
Other identified shortcomings relate, more generally to the compliance with international obligations including Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) recommendations and resolutions.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 7. februarja 2013 od Šrilanke zahtevala, naj ji zagotovi posodobljene informacije na ključnih področjih predlaganega akcijskega načrta.
A lack of compliance with recommendations and resolutions from relevant bodies such as the International Plan of Action against Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing of the United Nations (IPOA-IUU) was also identified.
Organi Šrilanke so 13. marca 2013 predložili naslednje dokumente:
However, the lack of compliance with non-binding recommendations and resolutions was considered only as supporting evidence and not as a basis for the identification.
Komisija in Šrilanka sta se 17. aprila 2013 v Bruslju sestali na tehničnih posvetovanjih.
Through its submission of 14 December 2012, Sri Lanka informed the Commission of institutional arrangements set up in order to address the shortcomings identified in the suggested action plan.
Na navedenem sestanku so organi Šrilanke Komisiji predstavili svoj najnovejši nacionalni akcijski načrt za boj proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu ter načrtovane ukrepe za izboljšanje navzkrižnega preverjanja informacij, ki jih vsebujejo potrdila o ulovu, in začeto revizijo pravnega okvira.
Sri Lanka submitted written comments on 31 December 2012 and 4 January 2013.
Šrilanka je s predložitvijo dopisov z dne 30. maja 2013 in 3. junija 2013 poudarila svojo zavezo, da bo pravočasno izvedla časovni razpored, ki ga je dopolnila, pri čemer bo sprejela zakonodajne spremembe za krepitev kazenskih ukrepov za nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov ter začela postopek naročanja sistema za spremljanje plovil (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sistem VMS).
By letter of 7 February 2013, the Commission requested Sri Lanka to provide updated information on key areas of the suggested action plan.
Šrilanka je 22. avgusta 2013 predložila poročilo o napredku za obdobje od 31. maja 2013 do 15. avgusta 2013, temu je sledila predložitev dopisa z dne 28. oktobra 2013 z informacijami o postopku sprejetja spremenjene zakonodaje.
inspection scheme and (x) guidelines for procedures to investigate IUU activities in the high seas.
Komisija je na podlagi člena 31(3) uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova preverila izpolnjevanje mednarodnih obveznosti s strani Šrilanke kot države zastave, pristanišča, obalne države ali države trga ob upoštevanju ugotovitev iz sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012 in ustreznih informacij, ki jih je zagotovila Šrilanka, predlaganega akcijskega načrta ter ukrepov, sprejetih za izboljšanje razmer.
Technical consultations between the Commission and Sri Lanka took place on 17 April 2013 in Brussels.
Pri tem pregledu je upoštevala merila iz člena 31(4) do (7) uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
During that meeting, the Sri Lankan authorities presented to the Commission its recent National Plan of Action to combat IUU fishing as well as planned measures to improve cross-checking of information contained in catch certificates and the initiated revision of the legal framework.
Ponavljajoč se nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov (člen 31(4)(a) uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova)
Based on the progress detected in the period from November 2012 to early June 2013, the Commission informed Sri Lanka by letter of 11 June 2013 that in order to achieve tangible results addressing the shortcomings highlighted in the Decision of 15 November 2012 and concluding the necessary actions, the Commission would maintain the dialogue with Sri Lanka for an additional period of nine months, until 28 February 2014.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 296 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012, je bilo na osnutek seznama nezakonitih, neprijavljenih in nereguliranih plovil, ki ga vodi Komisija za tune v Indijskem oceanu (IOTC), uvrščenih 13 šrilanških plovil, ki so jih ujeli pri ribolovu v nasprotju z ukrepi IOTC za ohranjanje in upravljanje.
This letter was followed by an updated proposal for the plan of action by the Commission on 20 June 2013.
Šrilanka po sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012 svojim plovilom ni prepovedala nezakonitega ribolova na odprtem morju, niti ni nemudoma sprejela zakonodaje, ki bi omogočila ribolov na odprtem morju in izdajanje dovoljenj za ribolov na odprtem morju, da bi preprečila nezakonite dejavnosti ribolova svojih plovil.
Sri Lanka submitted a progress report on 22 August 2013 for the period 31 May 2013 to 15 August 2013, followed by a submission on 28 October 2013 with information on adoption procedure for the amended legislation.
Namesto tega je 5. novembra 2013 končno sprejela revidiran zakon o ribolovu, ki dovoljuje ribolov na odprtem morju.
The Commission visited the Sri Lankan authorities concerned from 28 to 30 January 2014.
Pripravila je osnutek izvedbene zakonodaje za izdajanje dovoljenj plovilom za odprto morje in ta zakonodaja je bila sprejeta septembra 2014 (glede na dopis pristojnih organov), vendar še ni bila izvedena.
Those authorities were kept informed of the progress of the situation in line with the Decision of 15 November 2012 and the proposed action plan.
Poleg tega je Šrilanka zmanjšala število plovil, ki opravljajo dejavnosti na območju IOTC, s 3307 na 1758, vendar ta plovila še naprej opravljajo dejavnosti ribolova z upravnim dovoljenjem za odprto morje, in ne z zakonitim dovoljenjem.
request for VMS funding and demonstration of transponder requirement;
Opozoriti je treba, da je država zastave v skladu s členom 18(1) in (2) UNFSA odgovorna za svoja plovila, ki opravljajo dejavnosti na odprtem morju.
and updated timeframe for the implementation of the National Plan of Action in the fight against IUU also contained; a letter from the Ministry External Affairs to the Ministry of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Development informing that a copy of the instrument of acceptance for accession to the FAO Compliance Agreement will be submitted once the accession has happened; a request to the Attorney General to introduce increased sanctions into the current legislation;
To kaže tudi na nezmožnost Šrilanke, da bi zagotovila, da ribiška plovila, ki so upravičena do plovbe pod njeno zastavo, ne opravljajo ali omogočajo nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, kar je v nasprotju s točko 34 mednarodnega akcijskega načrta proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu, ki določa, da države zagotovijo, da ribiška plovila, upravičena do plovbe pod njihovo zastavo, ne opravljajo ali omogočajo nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
2 letters from the Legal Draftsmen with the revised draft regulations on respectively High Seas Fishing Operations and Fish Catch Data Collection plus a summary of the awareness programmes for high seas skippers and the implementation report to the IOTC on a regional observe scheme.
Poleg tega navzočnost plovil pod zastavo Šrilanke iz uvodnih izjav 36 do 38 tudi kaže, da Šrilanka ne izpolnjuje svojih obveznosti v skladu s členom 19(1) in (2) UNFSA, v skladu s katerim mora država zastave zagotoviti skladnost svojih plovil, ki plujejo pod njeno zastavo, s pravili o ohranjanju in upravljanju, ki so jih določile regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribolova.
Sri Lanka provided additional information on 29 August 2014 explaining advancements on the established shortcomings (i.e. draft regulations on High Seas Fishing Operations and Fish Catch Data Collection, information Circular on sanctioning, information on observer and inspection programmes and information on progress made on the established shortcomings).
Komisija je ugotovila tudi, da Šrilanka zaradi pomanjkljivosti svojega pravnega okvira ni mogla učinkovito izvesti ustreznih ukrepov v zvezi s ponavljajočim se nezakonitim, neprijavljenim in nereguliranim ribolovom.
The oral and written comments submitted by Sri Lanka following the Decision of 15 November 2012 were considered and taken into account while Sri Lanka was kept informed either orally or in writing on the Commission's considerations.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 36 tega sklepa, je Šrilanka novembra 2013 sprejela revidiran zakon o ribolovu, v skladu s katerim je svojim plovilom dovolila, da opravljajo dejavnosti ribolova zunaj njene IEC.
In the light of the elements gathered, as shown in recitals 34 to 67, the Commission believes that Sri Lanka has not sufficiently addressed the areas of concern and shortcomings described in the Decision of 15 November 2012.
Vendar je zakon, potreben za izvajanje sistema izdajanja dovoljenj za odprto morje, še v fazi osnutka in se ne uporablja.
Nor has Sri Lanka fully implemented the measures suggested in the accompanying action plan.
Dovoljenja zdaj izdaja uprava brez predhodno določenega postopka in na nesistemski način.
IDENTIFICATION OF SRI LANKA AS A NON-COOPERATING THIRD COUNTRY
Poleg tega so v revidiranem zakonu o ribolovu določene strožje sankcije za kršitve glede nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, ki bi se lahko štele za odvračilne samo za del šrilanškega ladjevja za dolge razdalje (predvsem za male čolne, ki lovijo zunaj IEC Šrilanke, bi se sankcije lahko štele za ustrezne glede na omejeno ribolovno zmogljivost teh plovil).
Pursuant to Article 31(3) of the IUU Regulation, the Commission has reviewed the compliance of Sri Lanka with its international obligations as flag, port, coastal or market State, in line with the findings of the Decision of 15 November 2012 and with relevant information provided by Sri Lanka, with the proposed plan of action as well as with the measures taken to rectify the situation.
Vendar se je v letih 2013 in 2014 povečalo število velikih šrilanških plovil (daljših od 24 m), katerih ribolovna zmogljivost je od deset- do dvajsetkrat večja od ribolovne zmogljivosti malih plovil, stopnja sankcij, predvidena za ta del ladjevja v novem zakonu o ribolovu, pa se ne more šteti za odvračilno.
For the purpose of this review the Commission has taken into account the parameters listed in Article 31(4) to (7) of the IUU Regulation.
V skladu z veljavno zakonodajo [6] je najvišja predvidena kazen 8429 EUR (1500000 LKR [7]), kar ne more učinkovito prispevati k zagotavljanju skladnosti, odvračanju od kršitev in preprečevanju koristi, ki jih imajo kršitelji zaradi svojih nezakonitih dejavnosti.
Recurrence of IUU fishing (Article 31(4)(a) of the IUU Regulation)
Zato takšna stopnja sankcij ni skladna s členom 19(2) UNFSA, ki med drugim določa, da morajo biti sankcije dovolj stroge, da ostanejo kršitelji brez koristi, ki izhajajo iz njihovih nezakonitih dejavnosti.
As highlighted in recital 292 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, the Commission established that Sri Lanka had no legislation providing for the licensing of high seas fisheries.
Na podlagi tega Komisija meni, da je sistem sankcij, ki ga je uvedla Šrilanka, očitno nezadosten in nedvomno nesorazmeren z resnostjo morebitnih kršitev, morebitnim učinkom kršitev na vire in morebitno koristjo, ki lahko izhaja iz takih nezakonitih dejavnosti.
As mentioned in recital 296 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, 13 Sri Lankan vessels were listed in the draft IUU vessel list of IOTC as they had been caught fishing in breach of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) conservation and management measures.
Zato ukrepi, ki jih je Šrilanka sprejela glede na svoje dolžnosti kot država zastave, ne zadostujejo za izpolnjevanje določb iz člena 118 UNCLOS ter členov 18, 19 in 20 UNFSA.
Since the Decision of 15 November 2012, Sri Lanka has not prohibited its vessels from fishing illegally on the high seas nor has it immediately adopted legislation allowing for high seas fishing and for issuance of licences for high seas fishing in order to avoid the illegal fishing activities of its fishing vessels.
Komisija v skladu s členom 31(3) in členom 31(4)(a) uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova ter glede na uvodne izjave 292 do 299 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012 in razvoj dogodkov po tem datumu meni, da Šrilanka ni izpolnila dolžnosti, ki so ji bile naložene z mednarodnim pravom kot državi zastave ter zadevajo nezakonita, neprijavljena in neregulirana plovila ter nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov, ki ga opravljajo ali omogočajo ribiška plovila, ki plujejo pod njeno zastavo, ali njeni državljani, ter ni sprejela zadostnih ukrepov za preprečevanje evidentiranega in ponavljajočega se nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, ki so ga opravljala plovila, ki so predhodno plula pod njeno zastavo.
Sri Lanka has instead finally adopted a revised Fisheries Act on 5 November 2013 allowing high seas fishing.
Nesodelovanje in neizvrševanje (člen 31(5)(b), (c) in (d) uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova)
It drafted implementing legislation for licensing of high seas vessels, this implementing legislation has been adopted in September 2014 (according to submission of authorities) but has not been implemented yet.
Kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah 302 do 311 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012, je Komisija analizirala, ali je Šrilanka učinkovito sodelovala s Komisijo pri preiskavah in povezanih dejavnostih.
Sri Lanka has also reduced the number of vessels operating in the IOTC from 3307 to 1758 vessels but these vessels are still fishing with an administrative high seas licence and not a legal licence.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 296 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012, je morala Šrilanka vsak mesec poročati o ukrepih, ki so bili izvedeni proti plovilom, navedenim v uvodni izjavi 293 navedenega sklepa.
In this respect, it is recalled that pursuant to Article 18(3)(b)(ii) of the United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement [4] (UNFSA), a flag State must take measures to prohibit fishing on the high seas by its vessels which are not duly licensed or authorised to fish.
Kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 302 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012 in uvodni izjavi 45 zgoraj, Šrilanka ni izpolnila svojih obveznosti v zvezi z mesečnim poročanjem IOTC o 13 šrilanških plovilih, za katere se domneva, da opravljajo dejavnosti nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, vendar jih IOTC ni vključila na seznam.
The current established situation demonstrates clearly that Sri Lanka is not acting in accordance with its international responsibilities as a flag State.
Zato Šrilanka ni dokazala, da izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 94(2)(b) UNCLOS, ki določa, da ima država zastave v skladu s svojim notranjim pravom pristojnost nad vsako ladjo, ki pluje pod njeno zastavo, vključno z njenim poveljnikom, častniki in posadko.
Since the Decision of 15 November 2012 according to information retrieved from the IOTC [5], three Sri Lankan flagged vessels, Malshiri No 1, Gold Marine 5 and Lakpriya 2 were caught by coastal States in 2013 as presumably involved in IUU activities.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 306 in 307 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012, je Komisija analizirala tudi, ali je Šrilanka sprejela učinkovite izvršilne ukrepe v zvezi z izvajalci dejavnosti, odgovornimi za nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov, in ali se uporabljajo dovolj stroge sankcije, da ostanejo kršitelji brez koristi, ki izhajajo iz nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
It is recalled that, pursuant to Article 18(1) and (2) of the UNFSA, the flag State is responsible vis-à-vis its vessels operating on the high seas.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 41, Šrilanka po sprejetju sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012 ni vzpostavila sistema odvračilnih sankcij za velika plovila, ki spadajo v njeno ladjevje.
In addition, pursuant to Article 118 the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), a flag State must cooperate in the conservation and management of living resources which is clearly undermined by the presence of its fleet which is operating in IOTC without legal fishing licences and thus conducting IUU activities in line with definitions of Article 2 of the IUU Regulation.
Sedanji seznam sankcij ni skladen s členom 19(2) UNFSA, v katerem je med drugim določeno, da morajo biti sankcije dovolj stroge, da ostanejo kršitelji brez koristi, ki izhajajo iz njihovih nezakonitih dejavnosti.
Moreover, in 2013 it was found that 13 other Sri Lankan vessels, inspected while transiting through the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of a coastal State, were in breach of the IOTC conservation and management measures.
Razpoložljivi dokazi še vedno potrjujejo, da Šrilanka ni izpolnila svojih obveznosti v skladu z mednarodnim pravom glede učinkovitih izvršilnih ukrepov.
The Commission considers that the continued fishing by Sri Lankan vessels in breach of conservation and management measures of the IOTC is a clear indication that Sri Lanka has failed to undertake its flag State responsibilities under international law as stated in recital 37.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 36 do 38, dejstvo, da še naprej obstajajo plovila, ki pri dejavnostih ribolova kršijo ukrepe IOTC za ohranjanje in upravljanje, kaže, da Šrilanka ne spoštuje odgovornosti do svojih plovil, ki opravljajo dejavnosti na odprtem morju, kot je določeno v členu 18(1) in (2) UNFSA.
It also demonstrates the failure by Sri Lanka to ensure that fishing vessels entitled to fly its flag do not engage in or support IUU fishing, which is not in line with point 34 of the IPOA-IUU stipulating that States should ensure that fishing vessels entitled to fly their flag do not engage in or support IUU fishing.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 309 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012, stopnje razvoja Šrilanke ni mogoče obravnavati kot dejavnika, ki bi zmanjševal zmogljivost pristojnih organov v zvezi s sodelovanjem z drugimi državami in sprejemanjem izvršilnih ukrepov.
Furthermore, the existence of the Sri Lankan flagged vessels referred to recitals 36 to 38 also highlights Sri Lanka's failure to fulfil its obligations under Article 19(1) and (2) of the UNFSA pursuant to which a flag State is required to ensure compliance by its vessels flying its flag with RFMO conservation and management rules.
V uvodnih izjavah 65 do 67 je dodatno opisana ocena posebnih ovir pri razvoju.
The Commission also found that adequate measures in respect of recurrent IUU fishing could not be effectively taken by Sri Lanka due to the shortcomings of its legal framework.
Zato ukrepi, ki jih je Šrilanka sprejela glede na svoje dolžnosti kot država zastave, ne zadostujejo za skladnost s členom 94(2)(b) UNCLOS ter členoma 18 in 19 UNFSA.
It thus suggested, in the action plan, a revision of the legal framework to ensure compliance with international obligations in relation to the high seas; to remedy the lack of sufficient operational means to effectively monitor the Sri Lankan long distance fleet and to create a deterrent sanction scheme.
Komisija v skladu s členom 31(3) ter členom 31(5)(b), (c) in (d) uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova ter glede na uvodne izjave 302 do 311 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012 in razvoj dogodkov po tem datumu meni, da Šrilanka ni izpolnila dolžnosti v zvezi s prizadevanji za sodelovanje in izvrševanje, ki so ji bile kot državi zastave naložene z mednarodnim pravom.
As mentioned in recital 36 of this Decision, Sri Lanka adopted in November 2013 a revised Fisheries Act allowing its vessels to fish outside its EEZ.
Neizvajanje mednarodnih pravil (člen 31(6) uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova)
However, the act required for the implementation of high seas licensing system is still a draft and thus not applicable.
Kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah 314 do 334 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012, je Komisija analizirala vse informacije, ki jih je štela za pomembne v zvezi s statusom Šrilanke kot pogodbenice IOTC.
Licences are currently issued by the administration without a predetermined procedure in a non-systemic way.
Komisija je tako analizirala vse informacije, ki jih je štela za pomembne v zvezi s soglasjem Šrilanke po sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012, da bo izvedla ukrepe za ohranjanje in upravljanje, ki jih je sprejela IOTC.