natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Some parties claimed that the results obtained by the Union industry should be considered as reasonably positive in the context of the global economic crisis and that, with the exception of one injury indicator, namely market share, all other indicators did not point toward the existence of injury.
Nekatere strani so trdile, da bi bilo treba rezultate, ki jih je dosegla industrija Unije, glede na svetovno gospodarsko krizo obravnavati kot razmeroma dobre in da razen enega kazalnika škode, tj. tržnega deleža, noben kazalnik ni pokazal obstoja škode.
One party claimed that the average selling prices of the Union industry increased by around 34 % far more than its cost of production which increased by 13 % over the same period.
Ena od strani je trdila, da so se povprečne prodajne cene industrije Unije povečale za približno 34 %, torej za precej več kot njeni stroški proizvodnje, ki so se v istem obdobju povečali za 13 %.
In this respect it needs to be noted that at the beginning of the period considered, namely in 2009, the Union industry was selling below cost of production, and only managed to sell above cost of production from 2011 onwards.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da so bile na začetku obravnavanega obdobja, tj. leta 2009, prodajne cene industrije Unije nižje od stroškov proizvodnje; šele z letom 2011 ji je uspelo prodajne cene dvigniti nad stroške proizvodnje.
The investigation showed that although some injury indicators such as production volumes and capacity utilisation followed a positive trend, or remained stable such as employment, a number of other indicators relating to the financial situation of the Union industry, namely profitability, cash flow, investment and return on investment did not follow a satisfactory trend during the period considered.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so se v obravnavanem obdobju nekateri kazalniki škode, na primer obseg proizvodnje in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, sicer razvijali pozitivno ali ostali stabilni (to je npr. veljalo za zaposlovanje), razvoj številnih drugih kazalnikov v zvezi s finančnim položajem industrije Unije, tj. dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe in donosnost naložb, pa ni bil zadovoljiv.
While the indicator relating to investments improved in 2010, it dropped below 2009 figures in 2011 and the IP.
Kazalnik naložb se je leta 2010 sicer izboljšal, vendar je bil leta 2011 in v OP nižji kot leta 2009.
Although it is true that return on investments improved from 2009 until 2011 reaching 6,7 %, it dropped again to 0,8 % in the IP.
Čeprav se je donosnost naložb med letoma 2009 in 2011 izboljšala in je dosegla 6,7 %, se je v OP znova zmanjšala na 0,8 %.
Similarly indicators relating to profitability and cash flow improved until 2011 and they started again to deteriorate in the IP.
Podobno sta se kazalnika dobičkonosnosti in denarnega toka do leta 2011 izboljšala, v OP pa sta se znova začela slabšati.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the Union industry started to improve after 2009, but its recovery was slowed down by the dumped imports from the country concerned subsequently.
Torej je mogoče sklepati, da se je po letu 2009 položaj industrije Unije začel izboljševati, nato pa se je zaradi dampinškega uvoza iz zadevne države njeno okrevanje upočasnilo.
On a request by an interested party it is confirmed that the stock levels established in recital 100 of the provisional Regulation concerned the activity of the sampled Union companies.
Na zahtevo ene od zainteresiranih strani se potrdi, da je raven zalog, ugotovljena v uvodni izjavi 100 začasne uredbe, zadevala dejavnost vzorčenih družb Unije.
The Union industry argued that the target profit margin of 5 % set at the provisional stage was too low.
Industrija Unije je trdila, da je bila začasno določena ciljna stopnja dobička v višini 5 % prenizka.
The party did not substantiate its claim sufficiently.
Stran za svojo trditev ni predložila ustreznih dokazov.
Recital 95 of the provisional Regulation explains the reasons behind the choice of this profit margin and the investigation did not reveal any other reasons to change it.
V uvodni izjavi 95 začasne uredbe so pojasnjeni razlogi za izbiro te stopnje dobička in preiskava ni pokazala nobenega razloga za njeno spremembo.
Therefore, the target profit of 5 % is maintained for the purpose of the definitive findings.
Zato se za namen dokončnih ugotovitev ohrani 5-odstotna ciljna stopnja dobička.
One exporting producer argued that the Union industry’s difficulties are largely due to structural problems and that, therefore, the target profit margin of 5 % was unrealistic.
Eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdil, da so težave industrije Unije v veliki meri posledica strukturnih težav in da je 5-odstotna ciljna stopnja dobička zato nerealna.
It is recalled that according to the case law [8], the Institutions need to establish the profit margin which the Union industry could reasonably count on under normal conditions of competition, in the absence of the dumped imports.
Opozoriti je treba, da morajo institucije v skladu s sodno prakso [8] določiti stopnjo dobička, ki bi jo industrija Unije pod običajnimi pogoji konkurence brez dampinškega uvoza lahko upravičeno pričakovala.
In 2007, the profit margin was 3,7 %; as of 2008, due to the financial and economic crisis, it became negative.
Leta 2007 je stopnja dobička znašala 3,7 %, leta 2008 pa je zaradi finančne in gospodarske krize postala negativna.
The complaint argued, and the investigation established, that dumped imports started to arrive on the Union market as of 2007, when the volume of imports increased from 17727 tonnes in 2006 to 24811 tonnes.
Po trditvah v pritožbi in ugotovitvah preiskave se je dampinški uvoz na trg Unije začel leta 2007, ko se je obseg uvoza, ki je leta 2006 znašal 17727 ton, povečal na 24811 ton.
Therefore, it was not possible to establish the target profit margin based on the profit which could reasonably be counted on by the Union producers of the like product.
Zato ciljne stopnje dobička ni bilo mogoče določiti na podlagi dobička, ki bi ga lahko razumno pričakovali proizvajalci podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
Consequently, as explained in recital 95 of the provisional Regulation, the Commission considered it appropriate using the profit margin of 5 % on the basis of the real profits observed in other parts of the steel industry, which have not suffered from dumped and subsidized imports, as has been done in other recent investigations into similar product in the same sector.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 95 začasne uredbe, je Komisija zato menila, da bi bilo primerno uporabiti 5-odstotno stopnjo dobička na podlagi dejanskega dobička, ugotovljenega v drugih delih jeklarske industrije, ki niso utrpeli škode zaradi dampinškega in subvencioniranega uvoza; enako je bilo storjeno tudi v drugih nedavnih preiskavah podobnih izdelkov v istem sektorju [9].
Additionally, it should be noted that the 3,7 % profit margin observed in 2007 is considered in any case too low because of the presence and increase of dumped imports.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da se stopnja dobička v višini 3,7 % iz leta 2007 v vsakem primeru šteje za prenizko zaradi dampinškega uvoza, ki se je še povečal.
The Commission therefore concludes that the Union industry has suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of other comments, recitals 78 to 105 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb ni bilo, se uvodne izjave 78 do 105 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One exporting producer claimed that the provisional Regulation ignored that the Union industry was able to benefit from the increase in consumption since 2009 and that the Commission cannot assume that the Union industry will be able to maintain its market share indefinitely.
Eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdil, da v začasni uredbi ni bilo upoštevano, da je industrija Unije od leta 2009 lahko izkoriščala povečano potrošnjo, in da Komisija ne more domnevati, da bo industrija Unije svoj tržni delež lahko ohranjala v nedogled.
In response to these arguments it needs to be noted that the investigation revealed the market share of the dumped Indian imports grew with a higher pace than the consumption in the Union market.
V odzivu na te argumente je treba poudariti, da je preiskava pokazala, da se je tržni delež dampinškega uvoza iz Indije povečeval hitreje kot potrošnja na trgu Unije.
The volume of Indian dumped imports increased by 110 % while the consumption increased by 50 % over the same period.
Obseg dampinškega uvoza iz Indije se je povečal za 110 %, potrošnja pa se je v istem obdobju povečala za 50 %.
Furthermore the investigation also showed that the average Indian price was constantly below the average price of the Union industry during the same period and undercut the Union industry average price by 15 % during the IP.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da je bila povprečna indijska cena v istem obdobju ves čas nižja od povprečne cene industrije Unije in je v OP nelojalno znižala povprečne prodajne cene industrije Unije za 15 %.
As a result, while the Union industry indeed benefited from the increased consumption to a certain extent and it also could increase its sales volumes by 40 %, it could not maintain its market share as it could be expected under improving market conditions and given the Union industry’s free production capacity.
Industrija Unije je v določeni meri sicer dejansko izkoristila povečano potrošnjo in je svoj obseg prodaje lahko povečala za 40 %, ni pa mogla obdržati svojega tržnega deleža, kot bi bilo sicer mogoče pričakovati glede na vedno boljše tržne pogoje in prosto proizvodno zmogljivost industrije Unije.
Over the period considered, the development of non-dumped imports and prices is comparable to the evolution of dumped imports and prices.
V obravnavanem obdobju je bil razvoj nedampinškega uvoza in cen primerljiv z razvojem dampinškega uvoza in cen.
Moreover, prices of dumped imports were fundamentally at the same level as the prices of the non-dumped imports, in that average non-dumped import prices were lower by 0,4 %.
Poleg tega so bile cene dampinškega uvoza bolj ali manj na isti ravni kot cene nedampinškega uvoza: povprečne nedampinške uvozne cene so bile za 0,4 % nižje.
In addition, the volume of non-dumped imports is less than six per cent of total imports from the country concerned and slightly more than one percent of market share.
Poleg tega je obseg nedampinškega uvoza zajemal manj kot šest odstotkov skupnega uvoza iz zadevne države in nekoliko več kot 1 % tržnega deleža.
Therefore, the Commission considers that the injury caused by non-dumped imports from the country concerned does not break the causal link between the dumped imports from the country concerned and the material injury suffered by the Union industry during the IP.
Zato Komisija meni, da škoda, ki jo je povzročil nedampinški uvoz iz zadevne države, ne prekinja vzročne zveze med dampinškim uvozom iz zadevne države in znatno škodo, ki je bila povzročena industriji Unije v OP.
Two Indian exporting producers and the Government of India reiterated the claim that imports of stainless steel wire originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘China’) should have been included in the investigation and that the impact the imports from China had on the Union market and the Union industry was underestimated.
Dva od indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in indijska vlada so ponovno trdili, da bi moral biti uvoz žice iz nerjavnega jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske vključen v preiskavo in da je bil učinek tega uvoza na trg Unije in industrijo Unije podcenjen.
As mentioned in recital 115 of the provisional Regulation, since the initiation stage, no evidence of dumping causing injury to the Union industry, which may have justified the initiation of an anti-dumping investigation on imports originating in China, has been presented.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 115 začasne uredbe, od začetne faze do danes niso bili predloženi dokazi o dampingu, ki bi povzročal škodo industriji Unije, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče začeti protidampinško preiskavo uvoza s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The claim that China should have been included in the scope of the investigation is therefore rejected as unfounded.
Trditev, da bi bilo treba Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko vključiti v obseg preiskave, se zato zavrne kot neutemeljena.
However, the imports from China showed an increasing trend during the period considered and reached a market share of 8,3 % in the IP as stated in recital 113 of the provisional Regulation.
Vendar je uvoz iz Ljudske republike Kitajske v obravnavanem obdobju naraščal in v OP dosegel tržni delež v višini 8,3 %, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 113 začasne uredbe.
In addition, the Chinese import prices were lower than the prices of the Union industry and those of the Indian exporting producers in the Union market.
Poleg tega so bile cene uvoza s Kitajske nižje od cen industrije Unije in cen indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov na trgu Unije.
It was, therefore, further investigated whether the imports from People’s Republic of Chinacould have contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry and broken the causal link between that injury and the Indian dumped imports.
Zato je bilo dodatno proučeno, ali bi uvoz iz Ljudske republike Kitajske lahko prispeval k škodi, povzročeni industriji Unije, ter prekinil vzročno zvezo med škodo in indijskim dampinškim uvozom.
The information available at provisional stage suggested that the product mix represented by the Chinese imports was different and that the ranges where the Chinese products were present were different compared to the products sold by the Union industry or even those of Indian origin products sold in the Union market.
Po razpoložljivih informacijah v začasni fazi je bil nabor izdelkov, ki ga je predstavljal uvoz s Kitajske, drugačen, pa tudi segmenti, v katerih so bili prisotni kitajski izdelki, so se razlikovali od segmentov izdelkov, ki jih je prodajala industrija Unije, ali celo od segmentov izdelkov s poreklom iz Indije, ki so se prodajali na trgu Unije.
After publication of the provisional measure the Commission received several claims pointing to the possibility that Chinese low-priced imports during the IP would break the causal link between dumped Indian imports and material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Komisija je po objavi začasnega ukrepa prejela več trditev o tem, da bi lahko nizkocenovni uvoz s Kitajske v OP prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom iz Indije in znatno škodo, povzročeno industriji Unije.
Analysis made on the basis of the import statistics concerning the two CN codes under investigation showed that 29 % of Chinese imports were made on the lower end of the market (under CN code 72230099).
Analiza, opravljena na podlagi statističnih podatkov o uvozu v zvezi z dvema oznakama KN v preiskavi, je pokazala, da je 29 % uvoza s Kitajske spadalo v spodnji tržni segment (pod oznako KN 72230099).
This partly explains why Chinese prices on average are lower than those of the Union industry and the Indian exporting producers’.
To delno pojasni, zakaj so kitajske cene povprečno nižje od cen industrije Unije in indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The statistics for CN code 72230099 also showed that the customers of the Chinese producers were concentrated in the United Kingdomwhere the Union industry was basically not producing.
Statistični podatki za oznako KN 72230099 so tudi pokazali, da je bila večina strank kitajskih proizvajalcev iz Združenega kraljestva, kjer industrija Unije ni imela skoraj nobene proizvodnje.
Average price (EUR/MT)
Povprečna cena (v EUR/t)
As concern CN code 72230019 the analyses carried out on PCN basis showed that both the Union industry and Indian producers were mainly competing in the higher end of the market where prices could be up to four times higher than prices in the lower end within the same CN [10].
V zvezi z oznako KN 72230019 so analize, izvedene na podlagi kontrolne številke izdelka, pokazale, da so si industrija Unije in indijski proizvajalci konkurirali predvsem v zgornjem tržnem segmentu, v katerem so bile cene znotraj te oznake lahko tudi do štirikrat višje od cen v spodnjem tržnem segmentu.
As concerns the price level of imports from the People’s Republic of China, it needs to be pointed out that from 2009 until the IP the average price of Chinese imports remained above the price of the dumped exports of the product concerned from India, as can be seen from the following table showing the average price of Chinese exports falling under CN code 72230019.
V zvezi z ravnjo cen uvoza iz Ljudske republike Kitajske je treba poudariti, da je bila od leta 2009 do OP povprečna cena uvoza s Kitajske ves čas višja od cen dampinškega uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Indije, kar je razvidno iz spodnje razpredelnice, ki prikazuje povprečno ceno dampinškega izvoza iz Kitajske, ki se uvršča pod oznako KN 72230019.
In the IP for the first time the average Chinese import price dropped below that of the Indian import price of dumped imports.
V OP je bila povprečna kitajska uvozna cena prvič nižja od indijske uvozne cene dampinškega uvoza.
Furthermore, the comparison between the import volumes from the country concerned and People’s Republic of China showed that at any point during the period considered and particularly in the IP, imports from People’s Republic of China were at much lower levels than the imports from India.
Poleg tega je primerjava med količino uvoza iz zadevne države in Ljudske republike Kitajske pokazala, da je bil v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju in zlasti v OP obseg uvoza iz Ljudske republike Kitajske precej manjši od uvoza iz Indije.
The import volumes for People’s Republic of China amounted to basically less than half of the total imports from India.
Obseg uvoza iz Ljudske republike Kitajske je v osnovi znašal manj kot polovico celotnega uvoza iz Indije.
Therefore, even if the imports from the People’s Republic of China contributed to the injury suffered by the Union industry they could not have affected the situation of the Union industry to the extent to break the causal link between the dumped imports from the country concerned and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Uvoz iz Ljudske republike Kitajske je sicer res prispeval k škodi, povzročeni industriji Unije, vendar ni mogel vplivati na položaj industrije Unije v tolikšni meri, da bi prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom iz zadevne države in škodo, povzročeno industriji Unije.
Therefore, recital 113 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Zato se uvodna izjava 113 začasne uredbe potrdi.
One party argued that the Union producers’ poor financial performance might have been caused by competition from other Union producers which were not complainants or did not express their support to the investigation at the initiation of the case.
Ena od zainteresiranih strani je trdila, da bi slabo finančno uspešnost proizvajalcev Unije lahko povzročila konkurenca drugih proizvajalcev Unije, ki niso bili pritožniki ali niso izrazili podpore preiskavi ob začetku postopka.
Source: complaint and standing replies
Vir: Eurostat, pritožba in odgovori o reprezentativnosti.
Union sales of other producers in the Union (MT)
Prodaja drugih proizvajalcev EU v Uniji (t)
The Union producers which were not complainants and which did not specifically express support to the investigation accounted for 44 % of total Union sales reported in recital 86 of the provisional Regulation.
Proizvajalci Unije, ki niso bili pritožniki in niso izrecno izrazili podpore preiskavi, so predstavljali 44 % celotne prodaje Unije iz uvodne izjave 86 začasne uredbe.
However, such growth is relatively modest if compared to the growth of the dumped imports from the country concerned in the same period (+ 110 %).
Vendar je taka rast sorazmerno skromna v primerjavi z rastjo dampinškega uvoza iz zadevne države v istem obdobju (+ 110 %).
In the absence of comments, recitals 121 to 124 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker pripomb ni bilo, se uvodne izjave 121 do 124 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
General considerations
Splošne okoliščine
In the absence of comments, recital 125 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Ker pripomb ni bilo, se uvodna izjava 125 začasne uredbe potrdi.
In the absence of comments, recitals 126 to 133 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker pripomb ni bilo, se uvodne izjave 126 do 133 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of comments, recitals 142 to 144 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker pripomb ni bilo, se uvodne izjave 142 do 144 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the imposition of the provisional measures, seven users and one users’ association contacted the Commission and showed interest to cooperate in the investigation.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je sedem uporabnikov in eno združenje uporabnikov stopilo stik s Komisijo in izrazilo interes za sodelovanje v preiskavi.
Following their request, questionnaires were sent to them in April 2013.
Na njihovo zahtevo so jim bili aprila 2013 poslani vprašalniki.
However, only two users submitted a full questionnaire reply and overall the cooperating users represented 12 % of total imports from the country concerned during the IP and 2,5 % of the total Union consumption, while employing 32 persons involved in manufacturing finished products incorporating the product concerned.
Vendar sta le dva uporabnika predložila v celoti izpolnjen vprašalnik; na splošno so sodelujoči uporabniki predstavljali 12 % celotnega uvoza iz zadevne države v OP in 2,5 % celotne potrošnje Unije ter zaposlovali 32 oseb v proizvodnji končnih izdelkov, v katere je bil vključen zadevni izdelek.
The economic impact of the measures on users was reassessed on the basis of the new data available in the questionnaire replies and two users were visited to verify the information provided.
Gospodarski učinek ukrepov na uporabnike je bil ponovno ocenjen na podlagi novih razpoložljivih podatkov iz izpolnjenih vprašalnikov, pri dveh uporabnikih pa je bil opravljen obisk zaradi preverjanja predloženih informacij.
Users claimed that the level of profitability of 9 %, stated in recital 136 of the provisional Regulation was too high and was not representative for the users’ industry.
Uporabniki so trdili, da je bila stopnja dobičkonosnosti v višini 9 %, navedena v uvodni izjavi 136 začasne uredbe, previsoka in ni bila reprezentativna za industrijo uporabnikov.
Following the receipt of the additional questionnaire replies the average profitability of all cooperating users was recalculated and established at 2 % on turnover.
Po prejemu dodatnih izpolnjenih vprašalnikov je bila ponovno izračunana povprečna dobičkonosnost vseh sodelujočih uporabnikov in ugotovilo se je, da je znašala 2 % prihodka od prodaje.
It was also found that on average concerning the cooperating users, purchases from the country concerned constituted 44 % of the total purchases of the product concerned, and that the country concerned represented the exclusive source of supply for two cooperating users.
Prav tako je bilo ugotovljeno, da so pri vseh sodelujočih uporabnikih nakupi izdelkov iz zadevne države povprečno predstavljali 44 % vseh nakupov zadevnega izdelka, za dva sodelujoča uporabnika pa je bila zadevna država edini vir oskrbe z izdelkom.
During the IP, the turnover of the product incorporating the product concerned represented on average 14 % of total turnover of the cooperating users.
V OP je prihodek od prodaje izdelka, ki vključuje zadevni izdelek, v povprečju predstavljal 14 % skupnega prihodka od prodaje sodelujočih uporabnikov.