natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Decision 2013/722/EU of 29 November 2013 approving annual and multiannual programmes and the financial contribution from the Union for the eradication, control and monitoring of certain animal diseases and zoonoses presented by the Member States for 2014 and the following years (OJ L 328, 7.12.2013, p. 101).
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2013/722/EU z dne 29. novembra 2013 o odobritvi letnih in večletnih programov ter finančnega prispevka Unije za izkoreninjenje, nadzor in spremljanje nekaterih živalskih bolezni in zoonoz, ki so jih države članice predložile za leto 2014 (UL L 328, 7.12.2013, str. 101).
Commission Decision C(2014)1035 of 24 February 2014 authorising the use of unit costs under the annual and multiannual programmes for the eradication, control and surveillance of animal diseases and zoonoses.
Odločba Komisije C (2014) 1035 z dne 24. februarja 2014 o odobritvi uporabe stroškov na enoto v okviru letnih in večletnih programov za izkoreninjenje, nadzor in spremljanje živalskih bolezni in zoonoz.
determining that the temporary suspension of the preferential customs duty established under the stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, is not appropriate for imports of bananas originating in Peru for the year 2014
o ugotovitvi, da začasna opustitev preferencialnih carin, vzpostavljenih v okviru stabilizacijskega mehanizma za banane iz Trgovinskega sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kolumbijo in Perujem na drugi strani, za uvoz banan s poreklom iz Peruja za leto 2014 ni primerna
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 19/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2013 implementing the bilateral safeguard clause and the stabilisation mechanism for bananas of the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part [1], and in particular Article 15 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 19/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. januarja 2013 o izvajanju dvostranske zaščitne klavzule in stabilizacijskega mehanizma za banane iz Trgovinskega sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kolumbijo in Perujem na drugi strani [1] in zlasti člena 15 Uredbe,
A stabilisation mechanism for bananas has been introduced by the Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia and Peru, of the other part, which applies provisionally between the parties as regards Colombia and Peru from 1 August 2013 and from 1 March 2013 respectively.
Stabilizacijski mehanizem za banane je bil uveden s Trgovinskim sporazumom med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kolumbijo in Perujem na drugi strani, ki med pogodbenicami začasno velja v zvezi s Kolumbijo od 1. avgusta 2013 oziroma Perujem od 1. marca 2013.
According to this mechanism, and pursuant to Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) No 19/2013, once a defined trigger volume is exceeded for imports of fresh bananas (heading 08039010 of the European Union Combined Nomenclature) from Colombia or Peru, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act by which it may either temporarily suspend the preferential customs duty applied to imports of bananas from Colombia or Peru or determine that such suspension is not appropriate.
Na podlagi tega mehanizma in člena 15(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 19/2013 potem, ko je presežen sprožitveni obseg uvoza svežih banan (tarifna oznaka 08039010 kombinirane nomenklature Evropske unije) iz Kolumbije ali Peruja, Komisija sprejme izvedbeni akt, s katerim lahko začasno opusti preferencialno carino, ki se uporablja za uvoz banan iz Kolumbije ali Peruja, ali določi, da takšna opustitev ni primerna.
The decision of the Commission shall be taken in accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, in conjunction with Article 4 thereof.
Komisija sprejme sklep v skladu s členom 8 Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011 v povezavi s členom 4 Uredbe.
In November 2014 it appeared that the imports into the Union of fresh bananas originating in Peru exceeded the threshold defined by the above Trade Agreement.
Novembra 2014 je bilo videti, da je uvoz svežih banan s poreklom iz Peruja v Unijo presegel mejno vrednost iz zgoraj navedenega trgovinskega sporazuma.
In this context, pursuant to Article 15(3) of Regulation (EU) No 19/2013, the Commission examined the impact of the imports concerned on the situation of the market for bananas of the European Union, taking into account, inter alia, the effect of the imports concerned on the Union price level, the development of imports from other sources as well as the overall stability of the Union market.
Komisija je zato v skladu s členom 15(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 19/2013 proučila učinek zadevnega uvoza na trg Evropske unije za banane, pri čemer je med drugim upoštevala učinek zadevnega uvoza na raven cen v Uniji, razvoj uvoza iz drugih virov ter celotno stabilnost trga Unije.
Imports of fresh bananas from Peru represented only 1,9 % of the total imports of fresh bananas into the Union in the period January-September 2014 (based on Eurostat).
Uvoz svežih banan iz Peruja je v obdobju od januarja 2014 do septembra 2014 predstavljal samo 1,9 % celotnega uvoza svežih banan v Unijo (podatki Eurostata).
The average wholesale banana price on the Union market in October 2014 (0,98 EUR/kg) did not register notable changes compared to banana price averages for the previous months.
Povprečna veleprodajna cena banan na trgu Unije oktobra 2014 (0,98 EUR/kg) se v primerjavi s povprečnimi cenami iz prejšnjih mesecev ni občutno spremenila.
Furthermore, there is neither an indication that the stability of the Union market has been disturbed by the imports of fresh bananas from Peru in excess of the defined annual trigger import volume, nor that this had any significant impact on the situation of Union producers.
Poleg tega nič ne kaže, da bi bila stabilnost trga Unije ogrožena zaradi uvoza svežih banan iz Peruja, ki presega sprožitveni obseg uvoza, ali da bi ta imel večji vpliv na proizvajalce Unije.
Finally, there is no threat of serious deterioration or a serious deterioration for producers in the outermost regions of the Union.
Nazadnje ne obstaja tveganje za resno poslabšanje ali resno poslabšanje za proizvajalce v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Unije.
On the basis of the examination above, the Commission has concluded that the suspension of preferential customs duty on imports of bananas originating in Peru would not be appropriate.
Na podlagi zgornjega pregleda je Komisija sklenila, da začasna opustitev preferencialnih carin za uvoz svežih banan s poreklom iz Peruja ne bi bila primerna.
The Commission will continue to closely monitor banana imports from Peru,
Komisija bo še naprej pozorno spremljala uvoz banan iz Peruja –
The temporary suspension of preferential customs duty on imports of fresh bananas of heading 08039010 of the European Union Combined Nomenclature originating in Peru is not appropriate during year 2014.
Začasna opustitev preferencialnih carin za uvoz svežih banan iz tarifne oznake 08039010 kombinirane nomenklature Evropske unije s poreklom iz Peruja za leto 2014 ni primerna.
Done at Brussels, 17 December 2014.
V Bruslju, 17. decembra 2014
OJ L 17, 19.1.2013, p. 1.
UL L 17, 19.1.2013, str. 1.
amending Implementing Decision 2013/770/EU in order to transform the ‘Consumers, Health and Food Executive Agency’ into the ‘Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency’
o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa 2013/770/EU, da se „Izvajalska agencija za potrošnike, zdravje in hrano“ preoblikuje v „Izvajalsko agencijo za potrošnike, zdravje, kmetijstvo in hrano“
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes [1], and in particular Article 3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 58/2003 z dne 19. decembra 2002 o statutu izvajalskih agencij, pooblaščenih za izvajanje nekaterih nalog pri upravljanju programov Skupnosti [1], in zlasti člena 3 Uredbe,
By Commission Implementing Decision 2013/770/EU [2], the Commission created the Consumers, Health and Food Executive Agency (‘the Agency’) and entrusted it with the management of the Union programmes in the field of consumers and health for the period 2014 to 2020 and the management of the food safety training measures covered by Council Directive 2000/29/EC [3] and Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
Z Izvedbenim sklepom 2013/770/EU [2] je Komisija ustanovila Izvajalsko agencijo za potrošnike, zdravje in hrano (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) in jo zadolžila za upravljanje programov Unije na področju varstva potrošnikov in zdravja za obdobje 2014–2020 ter upravljanje ukrepov usposabljanja glede varnosti hrane, zajetih v Direktivi Sveta 2000/29/ES [3] in Uredbi (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].
The Agency has demonstrated its effectiveness and efficiency.
Agencija je dokazala svojo uspešnost in učinkovitost.
In its communication of 29 June 2011 ‘A budget for Europe 2020’ [5], the Commission proposed to use the option of more extensive recourse to existing executive agencies for the implementation of Union programmes in the next multiannual financial framework.
V svojem sporočilu z dne 29. junija 2011 „Proračun za strategijo Evropa 2020“ [5] je Komisija predlagala, da se obstoječe izvajalske agencije še bolj izkoristijo za izvajanje programov Unije v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru.
The management of information provision and promotion measures concerning agricultural products implemented in the internal market and in third countries under Regulation (EU) No 1144/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] involves the implementation of technical projects which do not entail political decision-making and require a high level of technical and financial expertise throughout the project cycle.
Upravljanje ukrepov informiranja in promocije kmetijskih proizvodov na notranjem trgu in v tretjih državah v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1144/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6] vključuje izvajanje tehničnih projektov, pri katerih sprejemanje političnih odločitev ni potrebno, zahteva pa visoko raven tehničnega in finančnega strokovnega znanja in izkušenj ves čas trajanja projekta.
The cost-benefit analysis (CBA) [7] carried out in accordance with Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 with the aim of assessing the costs and benefits of the delegation of parts of the 2014-2020 Union spending programmes to executive agencies covered the management of tasks under Regulation (EU) No 1144/2014.
Analizo stroškov in koristi (cost-benefit analysis – CBA) [7], ki se izvaja v skladu s členom 3(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 58/2003, z namenom ocene stroškov in koristi prenosa delov programov porabe Unije za obdobje 2014–2020 na izvajalske agencije, je zajelo upravljanje nalog iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1144/2014.
The CBA was adjusted by the Commission in order to yield further efficiency gains, and completed by additional staff reduction at Commission level in order to ensure overall budget neutrality by offsetting the increase in expenditure on additional human resources in the executive agencies through a reduction of the corresponding level of resources in the Commission.
Analiza stroškov in koristi je bila prilagojena s strani Komisije, da se pridobi dodatni prihranek, in dopolnjena je bila z dodatnim zmanjšanjem števila zaposlenih na ravni Komisije za zagotovitev splošne proračunske nevtralnosti z izravnavo povečanja odhodkov za dodatne človeške vire v izvajalskih agencijah z znižanjem ustrezne ravni virov Komisije.
This exercise already incorporated the resources linked to the delegation of this programme.
Ta postopek je že vključeval vire, povezane s prenosom tega programa.
The CBA has shown that entrusting the Agency with certain implementation tasks related to the information provision and promotion measures for agricultural products would entail significant qualitative and quantitative benefits compared with the in-house scenario under which those aspects would be managed internally within the Commission.
Analiza stroškov in koristi je pokazala, da bi prenos odgovornosti za nekatere izvedbene naloge v zvezi z ukrepi informiranja in promocije kmetijskih proizvodov na Agencijo prinesel občutne kvalitativne in kvantitativne koristi v primerjavi s scenarijem internega izvajanja, po katerem bi vse navedene vidike interno izvajala Komisija.
Those tasks are thematically in line with the mandate and mission of the Agency.
Navedene naloge so tematsko skladne s pristojnostmi in pooblastili Agencije.
The Agency has already built up competence, skills and capacities which are directly relevant for those tasks.
Agencija že ima znanja, spretnosti in zmogljivosti, ki so neposredno povezani z navedenimi nalogami.
Given its relatively small size, the Agency is well placed to take on tasks related to a programme with a similar management mode.
Glede na svojo sorazmerno majhnost je Agencija v ugodnem položaju, da prevzame naloge, povezane s programom s podobnim načinom upravljanja.
In addition, the management through the Agency will enhance the visibility of Union intervention in this field.
Poleg tega bo upravljanje prek Agencije povečalo prepoznavnost ukrepanja Unije na tem področju.
The new tasks can capitalise on the Agency's existing communication and outreach channels.
Nove naloge Agencije lahko izkoristijo obstoječe kanale komuniciranja in informiranja.
Furthermore, by taking on the new tasks the Agency will manage larger budgets and will increase its size to a level where further synergies can be found.
Poleg tega bo s prevzemom novih nalog Agencija upravljala z večjimi proračuni in povečala svoj obseg na raven, na kateri je mogoče najti dodatne sinergije.
Due to the timing for the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 1144/2014, the mandate of the Agency as laid down in Implementing Decision 2013/770/EU did not cover the delegation of this new programme.
Zaradi časa sprejetja Uredbe (EU) št. 1144/2014, pristojnosti Agencije, kakor so določene v Izvedbenem sklepu 2013/770/EU, niso zajemale prenosa tega novega programa.
In order to reflect these additional tasks, the Agency should be transformed into the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency.
Da bo njeno ime odražalo te dodatne naloge, bi bilo treba Agencijo preoblikovati v Izvajalsko agencijo za potrošnike, zdravje, kmetijstvo in hrano.
Implementing Decision 2013/770/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.
Izvedbeni sklep 2013/770/EU bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for by this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Executive Agencies,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za izvajalske agencije –
Implementing Decision 2013/770/EU is amended as follows:
Izvedbeni sklep 2013/770/EU se spremeni:
in the first subparagraph of Article 3(1), the following point (d) is added:
V Bruslju, 17. decembra 2014
Done at Brussels, 17 December 2014.
Predsednik
For the Commission
UL L 11, 16.1.2003, str. 1.
The President
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2013/770/EU z dne 17. decembra 2013 o ustanovitvi Izvajalske agencije za potrošnike, zdravje in hrano ter razveljavitvi Sklepa 2004/858/ES (UL L 341, 18.12.2013, str. 69).
OJ L 11, 16.1.2003, p. 1.
Direktiva Sveta 2000/29/ES z dne 8. maja 2000 o varstvenih ukrepih proti vnosu organizmov, škodljivih za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode, v Skupnost in proti njihovemu širjenju v Skupnosti (UL L 169, 10.7.2000, str. 1).
Commission Implementing Decision 2013/770/EU of 17 December 2013 establishing the Consumers, Health and Food Executive Agency and repealing Decision 2004/858/EC (OJ L 341, 18.12.2013, p. 69).
Uredba (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o izvajanju uradnega nadzora, da se zagotovi preverjanje skladnosti z zakonodajo o krmi in živilih ter s pravili o zdravstvenem varstvu živali in zaščiti živali (UL L 165, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community (OJ L 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1).
Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij – Proračun za strategijo Evropa 2020, COM(2011) 500 final.
Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules (OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
Uredba (EU) št. 1144/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. oktobra 2014 o ukrepih informiranja in promocije kmetijskih proizvodov na notranjem trgu in v tretjih državah ter razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3/2008 (UL L 317, 4.11.2014, str. 56).
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — A Budget for Europe 2020, COM(2011) 500 final.
Analiza stroškov in koristi prenosa nekaterih nalog v zvezi z izvajanjem programov Unije v obdobju 2014–2020 na izvajalske agencije (končno poročilo, 19. avgust 2013).
Regulation (EU) No 1144/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on information provision and promotion measures concerning agricultural products implemented in the internal market and in third countries and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 3/2008 (OJ L 317, 4.11.2014, p. 56).
Ustanovi se Izvajalska agencija za potrošnike, zdravje, kmetijstvo in hrano (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) ter nadomesti in nasledi izvajalsko agencijo, ustanovljeno s Sklepom 2004/858/ES, in sicer za obdobje od 1. januarja 2014 do 31. decembra 2024, njen statut pa ureja Uredba (ES) št. 58/2003.“
Cost Benefit Analysis for the delegation of certain tasks regarding the implementation of Union Programmes 2014-2020 to the Executive Agencies (Final Report 19 August 2013).
ukrepov informiranja in promocije kmetijskih proizvodov, ki se izvajajo na notranjem trgu in v tretjih državah.“
on the signing, on behalf of the Union and its Member States, and provisional application of a Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia
o podpisu Protokola o spremembi Sporazuma o skupnem zračnem prostoru med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Gruzijo na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji v imenu Unije in njenih držav članic ter o njegovi začasni uporabi
On 14 September 2012, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations, on behalf of the Union, its Member States and the Republic of Croatia, to conclude a Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part [1], to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia (‘the Protocol’).
Svet je 14. septembra 2012 Komisijo pooblastil za začetek pogajanj v imenu Unije, njenih držav članic in Republike Hrvaške za sklenitev Protokola o spremembi Sporazuma o skupnem zračnem prostoru med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Gruzijo na drugi strani [1] zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol).
Those negotiations were successfully completed on 5 December 2013.
Ta pogajanja so se uspešno zaključila 5. decembra 2013.
The Protocol should be applied provisionally,
Protokol bi bilo treba uporabljati začasno –
The signing of the Protocol amending the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia, is hereby authorised on behalf of the Union and its Member States, subject to the conclusion of the said Protocol.
Podpis Protokola o spremembi Sporazuma o skupnem zračnem prostoru med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Gruzijo na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji se odobri v imenu Unije in njenih držav članic s pridržkom sklenitve navedenega protokola.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Protocol on behalf of the Union and its Member States.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno(-e) za podpis Protokola v imenu Evropske unije in njenih držav članic.
The Protocol shall be applied on a provisional basis, in accordance with Article 3(2) thereof, as from the signing thereof by the parties [2], pending its entry into force.Article 4
Protokol se začasno uporablja v skladu s členom 3(2) Protokola od njegovega podpisa s strani pogodbenic [2] do začetka njegove veljavnosti.Člen 4
Done at Brussels,8 October 2014.
V Bruslju, 8. oktobra 2014
Article 2
z dne 15. decembra 2014
being parties to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and being Member States of the European Union (hereinafter ‘the Member States’), and THE EUROPEAN UNION,
o podpisu Protokola o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega prispevka, ki jih zagotavlja Sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Republiko Madagaskar in Evropsko skupnostjo
of 15 December 2014
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 43 v povezavi s členom 218(5) Pogodbe,
on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the Republic of Madagascar and the European Community
ob upoštevanju predloga Evropske komisije,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43 in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,
Svet je 15. novembra 2007 sprejel Uredbo (ES) št. 31/2008 o sklenitvi Sporazuma o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Madagaskar [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum).
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Sedanji protokol k Sporazumu preneha veljati 31. decembra 2014.
Whereas:
Svet je Komisijo pooblastil za pogajanja o novem protokolu k Sporazumu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Protokol), ki plovilom Unije dodeljuje ribolovne možnosti na ribolovnem območju, na katerem Republika Madagaskar izvaja svojo jurisdikcijo.
On 15 November 2007, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 31/2008 on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Madagascar [1] (‘the Agreement’).
Po zaključku teh pogajanj, je bil 19. junija 2014 parafiran Protokol.
The current Protocol expires on 31 December 2014.
Da bi zagotovili nadaljevanje ribolovnih dejavnosti plovil Unije, člen 15 Protokola določa možnost, da ga vsaka pogodbenica začasno uporablja od datuma njegovega podpisa, vendar najprej od 1. januarja 2015.
The Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a new protocol to the partnership agreement (‘the Protocol’) granting Union vessels fishing possibilities in the fishing zone over which the Republic of Madagascar has jurisdiction.
Protokol bi bilo treba podpisati.
Following the completion of those negotiations, the Protocol was initialled on 19 June 2014.
Do zaključka postopkov, potrebnih za njegovo sklenitev, bi bilo treba Protokol uporabljati začasno –
In order to ensure the pursuit of fishing activities by Union vessels, Article 15 of the Protocol provides for the possibility of the Protocol being applied on a provisional basis by each of the Parties, from the date of its signing and from 1 January 2015 at the earliest.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP: