natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The IMO Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) at its 93rd session adopted amendments to the SOLAS Convention, as set out in resolution MSC.366(93) of 22 May 2014, and to the Protocol of 1988 relating to the Load Lines Convention, as set out in resolution MSC.375(93) of 22 May 2014, with a view to rendering the III Code mandatory, together with an associated flag State audit scheme.
Odbor IMO za pomorsko varnost (MSC) je na svojem 93. zasedanju sprejel spremembe konvencije SOLAS, kot so določene v Resoluciji MSC.366(93) z dne 22. maja 2014, in spremembe Protokola iz leta 1988 h konvenciji o tovornih črtah, kot so določene v Resoluciji MSC.375(93) z dne 22. maja 2014, da bi Kodeks III, skupaj s povezanim sistemom pregledov držav zastave, postal obvezen.
The MEPC at its 65th session and the MSC at its 92nd session adopted an IMO Code for Recognized Organizations (RO Code), as set out in resolution MSC.349(92) of 21 June 2013.
Kodeks IMO o priznanih organizacijah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Kodeks RO), kot je določen v Resoluciji MSC.349(92) z dne 21. junija 2013, je bil sprejet na 65. zasedanju Odbora IMO za varstvo morskega okolja in na 92. zasedanju Odbora IMO za pomorsko varnost.
The MEPC at its 65th session adopted amendments to the Protocol of 1978 relating to the MARPOL Convention with a view to rendering the RO Code mandatory, as set out in resolution MEPC.238(65) of 17 May 2013.
Odbor IMO za varstvo morskega okolja je na svojem 65. zasedanju sprejel spremembe Protokola iz leta 1978 h konvenciji MARPOL, kot so določene v Resoluciji MEPC.238(65) z dne 17. maja 2013, da bi Kodeks RO postal obvezen.
The MSC at its 92nd session adopted amendments to the SOLAS Convention and to the Protocol of 1988 relating to the Load Lines Convention with a view to rendering the RO Code mandatory, as set in resolutions MSC.350(92) and MSC.356(92) of 21 June 2013.
Odbor IMO za pomorsko varnost je na svojem 92. zasedanju sprejel spremembe konvencije SOLAS in Protokola iz leta 1988 h konvenciji o tovornih črtah, kot so določene v resolucijah MSC.350(92) in MSC.356(92) z dne 21. junija 2013, da bi Kodeks RO postal obvezen.
The III and RO Codes are therefore expected to enter into force during the period between 1 January 2015 until 1 January 2018 in accordance with the applicable rules for the adoption, ratification and entry into force of amendments under each of the IMO conventions concerned.
Zato se pričakuje, da bosta kodeksa III in RO začela veljati 1. januarja 2015 in bosta veljala do 1. januarja 2018 v skladu z veljavnimi pravili o sprejetju, ratifikaciji in začetku veljavnosti sprememb na podlagi vsake zadevne konvencije IMO.
On 13 May 2013, the Council adopted Council Decision 2013/268/EU on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the International Maritime Organization (IMO) with regard to the adoption of certain Codes and related amendments to certain conventions and protocols [4].
Svet je 13. maja 2013 sprejel Sklep Sveta 2013/268/EU o stališču, ki se sprejme v imenu Evropske unije v okviru Mednarodne pomorske organizacije (IMO) v zvezi s sprejetjem določenih kodeksov in povezanih sprememb določenih konvencij in protokolov [4].
Pursuant to Article 5 of that Decision, the Council authorised the Member States to give their consent to be bound, in the interest of the Union and subject to the declaration set in the Annex of that Decision, by the amendments referred to in recitals (4) to (9) of this Directive.
V skladu s členom 5 navedenega sklepa je Svet države članice pooblastil, da izrazijo privolitev, da jih v interesu Unije in ob upoštevanju izjave iz Priloge k navedenemu sklepu zavezujejo spremembe iz uvodnih izjav od (4) do (9) te direktive.
The declaration annexed to Council Decision 2013/268/EU states that Member States consider that the III Code and the RO Code contain a set of minimum requirements on which States can elaborate and improve as appropriate for the enhancement of maritime safety and the protection of the environment.
V izjavi, priloženi k Sklepu Sveta 2013/268/EU, je navedeno, da države članice menijo, da kodeksa III in RO vsebujeta sklop minimalnih zahtev, ki jih lahko države po potrebi izpopolnijo in izboljšajo za večjo pomorsko varnost in varstvo okolja.
It also states that nothing in the III Code or RO Code shall be construed to restrict or limit in any way the fulfilment of Member States' obligations under the law of the Union in relation to the definition of ‘statutory certificates’ and ‘class certificates’, the scope of the obligations and criteria laid down for recognised organisations, and the duties of the European Commission as regards the recognition, assessment and, where appropriate, the imposition of corrective measures or sanctions on recognised organisations.
V priloženi izjavi je navedeno tudi, da se nič v kodeksu III ali RO ne razlaga kot kakršna koli omejitev izpolnjevanja obveznosti držav članic v skladu s pravom Evropske unije glede opredelitve „predpisanih spričeval“ in „klasifikacijskih spričeval“, področja uporabe obveznosti in meril, določenih za priznane organizacije, ter obveznosti Evropske komisije v zvezi s priznavanjem, ocenjevanjem priznanih organizacij in, če je ustrezno, naložitvijo popravnih ukrepov ali sankcij priznanim organizacijam.
The same declaration states that, in the case of an IMO audit, Member States will state that only compliance with those provisions of the relevant international conventions which Member States have accepted, including in the terms of this declaration, shall be verified.
V isti izjavi je navedeno še, da bodo države članice v primeru pregleda IMO navedle, da se mora preveriti skladnost z določbami ustreznih mednarodnih konvencij, ki so jih države članice sprejele, vključno s pogoji navedene izjave.
In the legal order of the Union, the scope of Directive 2009/15/EC as well as that of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 includes references to the ‘international conventions’ as described in recital (3).
V pravnem redu Unije področji uporabe Direktive 2009/15/ES in Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009 vključujeta sklice na „mednarodne konvencije“, kot so opisane v uvodni izjavi (3).
In this framework, amendments to IMO conventions are automatically brought into Union law at the same time when they enter into force at the international level, including the related codes of mandatory status such as the III and RO codes, which therefore form part of the IMO instruments relevant for the application of Directive 2009/15/EC.
V tem okviru spremembe konvencij IMO samodejno postanejo del prava Unije, ko začnejo veljati na mednarodni ravni, vključno s pripadajočimi kodeksi obveznega značaja, kot sta kodeksa III in RO, ki sta torej del instrumentov IMO, pomembnih za izvajanje Direktive 2009/15/ES.
Amendments to international conventions may however be excluded from the scope of Union maritime legislation in accordance with the conformity checking procedure if they meet at least one of the two criteria set out in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002.
Vendar se lahko spremembe mednarodnih konvencij v skladu s postopkom preverjanja skladnosti izključijo iz področja uporabe pomorske zakonodaje Unije, če izpolnjujejo vsaj enega od obeh meril iz člena 5(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2099/2002.
The Commission evaluated the amendments to the IMO conventions in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002 and determined that a number of discrepancies exist between, on the one hand, the III Code and the RO Code, and, on the other hand, Directive 2009/15/EC and Regulation (EC) No 391/2009.
Komisija je proučila spremembe konvencij IMO v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 2099/2002 in ugotovila, da so med kodeksoma III in RO na eni strani ter Direktivo 2009/15/ES in Uredbo (ES) št. 391/2009 na drugi strani številna neskladja.
First, paragraph 16.1 of part 2 of the III Code provides for a minimum list of resources and processes which flag States have to establish, including the provision of administrative instructions pertaining inter alia to ship class certificates required by the flag State to demonstrate compliance with structural, mechanical, electrical, and/or other requirements of an international convention to which the flag State is a party or compliance with a requirement of the flag State's national regulation.
Prvič, točka 16.1 v delu 2 Kodeksa III določa minimalni seznam sredstev in postopkov, ki jih morajo zagotoviti države zastave, vključno z upravnimi navodili, ki se med drugim nanašajo na ladijska klasifikacijska spričevala, ki jih država zastave zahteva za dokazovanje skladnosti s konstrukcijskimi, mehanskimi, električnimi in/ali drugimi zahtevami mednarodne konvencije, katere pogodbenica je država zastave, ali z zahtevo nacionalne zakonodaje države zastave.
As detailed in recital (21) below however, Union law draws a distinction between statutory certificates and class certificates.
Vendar, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi (21), pravo Unije razlikuje med predpisanimi in klasifikacijskimi spričevali.
The latter are documents of a private nature and are neither acts of a flag State nor issued on any flag State's behalf.
Klasifikacijska spričevala so dokumenti zasebne narave in niso niti akti države zastave niti niso izdani v imenu države zastave.
The SOLAS convention clearly identifies the ship or its legal representation vis-à-vis the flag State as the object of this requirement.
Poleg tega priznana organizacija, kadar deluje kot klasifikacijski zavod, izdaja ladijska klasifikacijska spričevala v skladu s svojimi pravili, postopki, pogoji in zasebnimi pogodbenimi dogovori, katerih pogodbenice ne vključujejo države zastave.
Furthermore, when acting in its capacity as class society, a recognised organisation issues ship class certificates in accordance with its own rules, procedures, conditions and private contractual arrangements, to which the flag State is not a party.
Zato je ta določba Kodeksa III v nasprotju z razmejitvijo med klasifikacijskimi in predpisanimi dejavnostmi, kot so določene v veljavni zakonodaji EU.
Therefore, this provision of the III Code contradicts the delineation of class and statutory activities as set out in the existing EU legislation.
Drugič, točka 18.1 v delu 2 Kodeksa III zahteva, da država zastave „samo za ladje, ki so upravičene do plovbe pod njeno zastavo,“ preveri, ali ima priznana organizacija zadostne tehnične, upravljavske in raziskovalne zmogljivosti za opravljanje dodeljenih nalog.
Second, paragraph 18.1 of part 2 of the III Code requires the flag State to determine, ”with regard only to ships entitled to fly its flag”, that a recognised organisation has adequate resources in terms of technical, managerial and research capabilities to accomplish the duties entrusted to it.
V nasprotju s tem je ta vidik v okviru prava Unije obravnavan kot zahteva za namene priznanja, kot je razvidno iz merila A.3 v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 391/2009, in v zvezi s celotnim ladjevjem, ki ga je klasificirala zadevna organizacija, brez razlikovanja na podlagi zastave.
In contrast, this aspect is addressed under Union law as a requirement for the purpose of the recognition as reflected in criterion A.3 in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009, and with regard to the entire fleet in the class of the organisation concerned, without distinction based on flag.
Če bi se navedena določba Kodeksa III vključila v pravo Unije, bi uporabo merila A.3 v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 391/2009 omejila na poslovanje priznane organizacije v zvezi z ladjami, ki plujejo pod zastavami držav članic, kar je v nasprotju s trenutno veljavnimi zahtevami.
Should the above provision of the III Code be incorporated into Union law, it would restrict the application of criterion A.3 in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 to the recognised organisation's performance with regard only to ships flying the flag of Member States, in contradiction with the requirements currently in force.
Tretjič, točka 19 v delu 2 Kodeksa III uvaja prepoved, po kateri država zastave svojih priznanih organizacij ne sme pooblastiti, da za ladje, ki niso upravičene do plovbe pod njeno zastavo, uporabljajo zahteve, ki se med drugim nanašajo na klasifikacijska pravila, zahteve ali postopke teh organizacij.
Third, paragraph 19 of part 2 of the III Code introduces a prohibition for a flag State to mandate its recognised organisations to apply to ships, other than those entitled to fly its flag, any requirements pertaining to inter alia their classification rules, requirements or procedures.
V skladu z Direktivo 2009/15/ES lahko države članice organizacijo pooblastijo, da v njihovem imenu izdaja predpisana spričevala njihovemu zadevnemu ladjevju, vendar samo, če je navedena organizacija priznana in se spremlja za ta namen v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 391/2009.
Pursuant to Directive 2009/15/EC, Member States can only authorise an organisation to act on their behalf for the statutory certification of their respective fleet if that organisation has been recognised and is being monitored for this purpose in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 391/2009.
V tem okviru morajo priznane organizacije kot take pri zadevnih dejavnostih v zvezi s celotnim ladjevjem, ki so ga klasificirale, izpolnjevati določene zahteve, ne glede na zastavo.
In this framework, the recognised organisations as such have to comply with certain requirements in their relevant activities across their classed fleet, irrespective of the flag.
To se nanaša na večino meril iz Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 391/2009, pa tudi na druge obveznosti, zlasti na člen 10(4) navedene uredbe.
This relates to most of the criteria set out in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009, as well as to other obligations, in particular Article 10(4) of that Regulation.
Če bi se navedena določba Kodeksa III vključila v pravo Unije, bi uporabo veljavnih zahtev glede priznanja iz Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009, med drugim če predstavljajo pravila, postopke in zahteve glede poslovanja priznane organizacije, omejila na poslovanje priznane organizacije v zvezi z ladjami, ki plujejo pod zastavami držav članic.
Should the above provision of the III Code be incorporated into Union law, it would restrict the application of the existing recognition requirements in Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 inter alia if they qualify as rules, requirements and procedures to the recognised organisation's performance with regard only to ships flying the flag of Member States.
Četrtič, v oddelku 1.1 v delu 2 Kodeksa RO je „priznana organizacija“ opredeljena kot organizacija, ki jo je država zastave proučila in ugotovila, da izpolnjuje zahteve iz dela 2 Kodeksa RO.
Fourth, section 1.1 of part 2 of the RO Code defines a ‘Recognized Organization’ as an organisation assessed by a flag State and found to comply with part 2 of the RO Code.
V nasprotju s tem člen 2(g) Direktive 2009/15/ES določa, da priznana organizacija pomeni „organizacijo, priznano v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 391/2009“.
In contrast, Article 2(g) of Directive 2009/15/EC provides that a recognised organisation is ‘an organisation recognised in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 391/2009’.
Na podlagi ocene Komisije iz uvodnih izjav od (21) do (23) se zdi, da je več določb v delu 2 Kodeksa RO nezdružljivih z Uredbo (ES) št. 391/2009.
Based on the Commission's evaluation set out in recitals (21) to (23), it appears that several provisions in part 2 of the RO Code are incompatible with Regulation (EC) No 391/2009.
Zato priznana organizacija, kot je opredeljena v Kodeksu RO, ne bi izpolnjevala vseh zahtev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009 in torej ne bi bila v skladu z opredelitvijo priznane organizacije, kot je določena v pravu Unije.
Consequently, a recognised organisation as defined in the RO Code would not fulfil all the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 and could therefore not meet the definition of a recognised organisation as set out in Union law.
Petič, v oddelku 1.3 v delu 2 Kodeksa RO je „izdajanje predpisanih spričeval in opravljanje storitev“ opredeljeno kot enotna kategorija dejavnosti, ki jih lahko priznana organizacija opravlja v imenu države zastave, vključno z izdajanjem spričeval, ki se nanašajo na zakonske in klasifikacijske zahteve.
Fifth, section 1.3 of part 2 of the RO Code defines ‘statutory certification and services’ as a single category of activities that a recognised organisation is entitled to perform on behalf of the flag State, including the issuance of certificates pertaining to both statutory and class requirements.
V nasprotju s tem opredelitvi v členu 2(i) in (k) Direktive 2009/15/ES jasno razlikujeta med „predpisanimi spričevali“, to so spričevala, ki jih izda država zastave ali so izdana v njenem imenu v skladu z mednarodnimi konvencijami, in „klasifikacijskimi spričevali“, to so dokumenti, ki jih izda priznana organizacija, ki deluje kot klasifikacijski zavod, in potrjujejo primernost ladje za določeno uporabo ali storitev v skladu s pravili in postopki, ki jih določi in objavi zadevna priznana organizacija.
In contrast, the definitions set out in Article 2(i) and (k) of Directive 2009/15/EC draw a clear distinction between ‘statutory certificates’, which are those certificates issued by or on behalf of a flag State in accordance with the international conventions, and ‘class certificates’, which are those documents issued by a recognised organisation, in its capacity as class society, certifying the fitness of a ship for a particular use or service in accordance with the rules and procedures laid down and made public by that recognised organisation.
Iz tega sledi, da se predpisana in klasifikacijska spričevala v okviru prava Unije razlikujejo, tudi po naravi.
It follows that, under Union law, statutory and class certificates are distinct and have different natures.
Predpisana spričevala so namreč javna, klasifikacijska spričevala pa zasebna, saj jih klasifikacijski zavodi izdajo v skladu s svojimi pravili, postopki in pogoji.
Namely, statutory certificates have a public nature, while class certificates have a private nature, being issued by the class society in accordance with its own rules, procedures and conditions.
Klasifikacijska spričevala, ki jih priznana organizacija izda za ladjo, da bi potrdila njeno skladnost s klasifikacijskimi pravili in postopki, vključno s spričevali, ki jih država zastave potrdi kot dokazilo o skladnosti s pravilom 3-1 v delu A-1 poglavja II-I konvencije SOLAS, so dokumenti povsem zasebne narave, ki niso niti akti države zastave niti niso izdani v imenu države zastave.
It follows that classification certificates issued by a recognised organisation for a ship in order to attest compliance with classification rules and procedures, including when verified by a flag State as proof of compliance with SOLAS Chapter II-I, Part A-1, Regulation 3-1, are documents of a strictly private nature which are neither acts of a flag State nor carried out on any flag State's behalf.
Vendar se „izdajanje predpisanih spričeval in opravljanje storitev“ v Kodeksu RO sistematično navaja kot dejavnost, ki jo priznana organizacija opravlja „v imenu države zastave“, kar je v nasprotju s pravnim razlikovanjem, določenim v pravu Unije.
In the RO Code however, ‘statutory certification and services’ are systematically referred to as being performed by the RO ”on behalf of the flag State”, contradicting the legal distinction established in Union law.
Ne glede na to nasprotje bi ta določba Kodeksa RO, če bi bila sprejeta kot standard pravnega reda Unije, pomenila očitno tveganje, da zahtev glede priznanja iz Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009, ki se nanašajo na celotno dejavnost organizacije, ne glede na zastavo, v EU ne bi bilo več mogoče uveljavljati.
Notwithstanding this contradiction, this provision of the RO Code, if accepted as a norm in the Union legal order, entails a manifest risk that the recognition requirements contained in Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 which pertain to the entire activity of the organisation, irrespective of flag, could no longer be enforced within the EU.
Zaradi povezave med obema instrumentoma, ki je pojasnjena v uvodni izjavi (2), to tveganje zadeva tudi Direktivo 2009/15/ES.
Due to the link between the two instruments as explained in recital (2), this risk is also relevant to Directive 2009/15/EC.
V nasprotju s tem sodelovanje med priznanimi organizacijami v skladu s pravom Unije ureja člen 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009, ki od priznanih organizacij zahteva, da se med seboj posvetujejo, da bi ohranile enakovrednost ter si prizadevale za usklajenost svojih pravil in postopkov in njihovega izvajanja, in vzpostavlja okvir, na podlagi katerega se v ustreznih primerih vzajemno priznavajo klasifikacijska spričevala za materiale, opremo in sestavne dele.
In contrast, co-operation between recognised organisations under Union law is governed by Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009, which requires recognised organisations to consult with each other with a view to maintaining equivalence and aiming for harmonisation of their rules and procedures and the implementation thereof, and sets out a framework for the mutual recognition, in appropriate cases, of class certificates for materials, equipment and components.
Nič v kodeksu III ali RO ne bi smelo na noben način omejevati pristojnosti Unije, da v skladu s pogodbami in mednarodnim pravom določa ustrezne pogoje za podeljevanje priznanja organizacijam, ki želijo dobiti pooblastilo držav članic za opravljanje pregleda ladij in izdajo spričeval v njihovem imenu, z namenom, da se dosežejo cilji Unije, zlasti da se izboljšata pomorska varnost in varstvo okolja.
Those two co-operation processes under Article 10(1) pertain to the private activities of the recognised organisations, in their capacity as classification societies, and therefore apply without distinction based on flag.
Sistem za vzajemno priznavanje klasifikacijskih spričeval za materiale, opremo in sestavne dele, kot je določen s členom 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009, se lahko uveljavlja samo v Uniji v zvezi z ladjami, ki plujejo pod zastavo države članice.
The co-operation mechanisms provided for in the RO Code, if incorporated into Union law, would therefore limit the scope of the co-operation framework established by Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 to the recognised organisations' activities with regard only to ships flying the flag of Member States, in contradiction with the requirements currently in force.
Kar zadeva tuja plovila, lahko o sprejemanju zadevnih spričeval še naprej v okviru svoje izključne pristojnosti, zlasti na podlagi Konvencije Združenih narodov o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu (UNCLOS), po svoji presoji odločajo ustrezne države zastave, ki niso članice EU.
Nothing in either the III Code or the RO Code should place any restrictions on the Union's capacity to lay down, in accordance with the Treaties and international law, appropriate conditions for the granting of recognition to organisations wishing to be authorised by the Member States to carry out ship survey and certification activities on their behalf, with a view to achieving the Union's objectives and in particular to enhance maritime safety and the protection of the environment.
Ker Kodeks RO začne veljati 1. januarja 2015, bi ta direktiva morala začeti veljati kar najhitreje po njeni objavi.
The scheme for the mutual recognition of class certificates for materials, equipment and components laid down by Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 is only enforceable within the Union in respect of ships flying the flag of a Member State.
Odbor za varnost na morju in preprečevanje onesnaževanja z ladij (COSS) ni podal mnenja o ukrepih iz te direktive.
As far as foreign vessels are concerned, the acceptance of relevant certificates remains at the discretion of relevant non-EU flag States in the exercise of their exclusive jurisdiction, notably under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
Potreben je bil izvedbeni akt, zato je predsednik odboru za pritožbe predložil osnutek izvedbenega akta v nadaljnjo obravnavo.