natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 December 2013.
Ta uredba začne veljati 14. decembra 2013.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 of 14 December 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the import arrangements for milk and milk products and opening tariff quotas (OJ L 341, 22.12.2001, p. 29).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2535/2001 z dne 14. decembra 2001 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1255/1999 glede uvoznega režima za mleko in mlečne proizvode ter o odprtju tarifnih kvot (UL L 341, 22.12.2001, str. 29).
No licence applications have been sent to the Commission.
Komisija ni prejela nobenega zahtevka za izdajo dovoljenja.
Products originating in Norway
Proizvodi s poreklom z Norveške
Products originating in Iceland
Izdelki s poreklom z Islandije
Products originating in New Zealand
Proizvodi s poreklom z Nove Zelandije
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1342/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1342/2013
repealing the anti-dumping measures on imports of certain iron or steel ropes and cables originating in the Russian Federation following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o razveljavitvi protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz nekaterih vrst jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Ruske federacije po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa na podlagi člena 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 9(2) and 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba), ter zlasti člena 9(2) in člena 11(2) Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 1601/2001 [2] the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel ropes and cables (SWR) originating in the Russian Federation, Turkey, Thailand, and the Czech Republic.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1601/2001 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Ruske federacije, Turčije, Tajske in Češke.
Those measures will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the original measures’ and the investigation that led to those measures will hereinafter be referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Ti ukrepi so v nadaljnjem besedilu „prvotni ukrepi“, preiskava, ki je privedla do veljavnih ukrepov, pa je v nadaljnjem besedilu „prvotna preiskava“.
The Commission had accepted in August 2001 a price undertaking offer by a Russian producer (JSC Severstal-Metiz).
Komisija je avgusta 2001 sprejela ponudbo za cenovno zavezo s strani ruskih proizvajalcev (JSC Severstal-Metiz).
That undertaking agreement was repealed in October 2007 [3] because it was considered unworkable due to difficulties in the proper classification of the large number of product types exported by the company.
Ta sporazum o zavezi je bil razveljavljen oktobra leta 2007 [3], saj se je štelo, da ga ni mogoče izvajati zaradi težav pri ustrezni razvrstitvi številnih vrst izdelka, ki ga je izvažala družba.
Regulation (EC) No 1279/2007 also terminated the measures concerning imports of steel ropes and cables originating in Turkey and Thailand.
Uredba (ES) št. 1279/2007 je tudi ukinila ukrepe glede uvoza jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Turčije in Tajske.
Currently [5], there are also measures in force against SWR from Ukraine and the People’s Republic of China, which were extended to imports of SWR consigned from Morocco, Moldova and the Republic of Korea.
Trenutno [5] so v veljavi tudi ukrepi za uvoz železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Ukrajine in Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki so bili razširjeni na uvoz železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov, poslanih iz Maroka, Moldavije in Republike Koreje.
On 27 October 2012, the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union the initiation of an expiry review (‘notice of initiation’) [6] of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of SWR originating in the Russian Federation pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 27. oktobra 2012 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, napovedala začetek pregleda zaradi izteka (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo o začetku) [6] protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Ruske federacije v skladu členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The review was initiated following a substantiated request lodged by the Liaison Committee of European Union Wire Rope Industries (hereafter referred to as ‘EWRIS’ or ‘the applicant’) on behalf of Union producers representing more than 50 % of the total Union production of certain iron or steel ropes and cables.
Pregled se je začel po utemeljenem zahtevku, ki ga je vložil Povezovalni odbor za industrijo jeklenih vrvi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Liaison Committee of European Union Wire Rope Industries – „EWRIS“ ali „vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev Unije, ki predstavljajo več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje Unije nekaterih železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in continuation of dumping and recurrence of injury to the Union Industry (‘UI’).
Zahtevek je temeljil na izhodišču, da bi iztek veljavnosti ukrepov verjetno povzročil nadaljevanje dampinga in ponovitev škode industriji Unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: IU).
The investigation of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2011 to 30 September 2012 (the ‘RIP’).
Preiskava glede nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava dampinga in škode je potekala od 1. oktobra 2011 do 30. septembra 2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: OPP).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2009 until the end of the RIP (period considered).
Preučitev trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do konca OPP (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, Union producers, importers and users known to it, as well as the applicant and the authorities of the exporting country.
Komisija je uradno seznanila njej znane proizvajalce izvoznike, proizvajalce Unije, uvoznike in uporabnike, kot tudi vložnika in organe države izvoznice.
In view of the potentially large number of exporting producers in the Russian Federation involved in the investigation, sampling was initially envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na potencialno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Ruski federaciji, vključenih v to preiskavo, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku prvotno predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would indeed be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, exporting producers from the Russian Federation were requested to make themselves known within 15 days from the initiation of the proceeding and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, so bili proizvajalci izvozniki iz Ruske federacije pozvani, da se v 15 dneh po začetku postopka javijo Komisiji in ji predložijo zahtevane informacije iz obvestila o začetku.
Given that only two exporting producers in the Russian Federation provided the information requested in the notice of initiation and expressed their willingness to further cooperate with the Commission, it was decided not to apply sampling for exporting producers.
Glede na to, da sta na poziv odgovorila le dva proizvajalca izvoznika iz Ruske federacije, ki sta predložila informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku, in izrazila pripravljenost za nadaljnje sodelovanje s Komisijo, je bilo odločeno, da se vzorčenje za proizvajalce izvoznike ne uporabi.
The Commission announced in the notice of initiation that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers and invited interested parties to comment thereupon within a deadline provided for in the notice of initiation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku najavila, da je začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije in pozvala zainteresirane strani, da ji posredujejo svoje pripombe v roku, ki je določen v obvestilu o začetku.
The provisional sample consisted of five Union producers that were found to be representative of the Union industry in terms of volume of production and sales of the like product in the Union.
Začasni vzorec je sestavljalo pet proizvajalcev Unije, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da predstavljajo industrijo Unije glede obsega proizvodnje in prodaje podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
In the absence of any comments, the proposed companies were selected to be included in the final sample and interested parties were accordingly informed.
Ker ni bila vložena nobena pripomba, so bile predlagane družbe izbrane v končni vzorec, zainteresirane strani pa so bile o tem ustrezno obveščene.
However, one of the finally selected companies subsequently withdrew from the sample.
Vendar se je en dokončno izbrani proizvajalec kasneje izločil iz vzorca.
The Commission therefore decided to reduce the sample to the four remaining companies, which were still found to be representative of the Union industry in terms of volume of production (29,3 %) and sales (20,9 %) of the like product in the Union.
Komisija se je zato odločila, da zmanjša vzorec na štiri preostale družbe, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da še vedno predstavljajo industrijo Unije glede obsega proizvodnje (29,3 %) in prodaje (20,9 %) podobnega izdelka v Uniji.
Although sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation of unrelated importers, neither any unrelated importer nor any user came forward.
Čeprav je bilo vzorčenje nepovezanih uvoznikov predvideno v obvestilu o začetku, se na vabilo ni javil noben nepovezan uvoznik ali uporabnik.
Therefore, sampling was not applied to unrelated importers.
Zato se vzorčenje za nepovezane uvoznike ni uporabilo.
Questionnaires were sent to the four sampled Union producers, the two exporting producers in the Russian Federation, and the related importer.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani štirim vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, dvema proizvajalcema izvoznikoma iz Ruske federacije ter povezanemu uvozniku.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from the four sampled Union producers, from the related importer and from one exporting producer from the Russian Federation.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so vrnili štirje vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, povezani uvoznik in proizvajalec izvoznik iz Ruske federacije.
Although two exporting producers from the Russian Federation had originally come forward, only one of them provided a reply to the questionnaire and is considered to be cooperating in the investigation.
Čeprav sta se prvotno javila dva proizvajalca izvoznika iz Ruske federacije, je le eden predložil odgovor na vprašalnik in zanj se šteje, da sodeluje v preiskavi.
The cooperating exporting producer has a wholly owned subsidiary based in Italy, which also produces SWR and imports the product concerned from the Russian Federation.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je edini lastnik hčerinske družbe s sedežem v Italiji, ki prav tako proizvaja železne ali jeklene vrvi in kable in zadevni izdelek uvaža iz Ruske federacije.
The other exporting producer provided a submission at the time of the initiation of the investigation and although it was invited to fill in a questionnaire, failed to do so.
Drugi proizvajalec izvoznik je predložil dokumentacijo ob začetku preiskave, vendar kljub pozivu, da predloži izpolnjen vprašalnik, tega ni storil.
It is therefore considered that the second exporting producer did not cooperate in the investigation.
Zato se šteje, da drugi proizvajalec izvoznik v preiskavi ni sodeloval.
BRIDON International Ltd, United Kingdom,
BRIDON International Ltd, Združeno kraljestvo,
TEUFELBERGER Seil GmbH, Austria,
TEUFELBERGER Seil GmbH, Nemčija,
Manuel Rodrigues de OLIVEIRA Sá & Filhos, S.A., Portugal;
Manuel Rodrigues de OLIVEIRA Sá & Filhos, S.A., Portugalska;
exporting producer in the Russian Federation:
proizvajalec izvoznik iz Ruske federacije:
REDAELLI Tecna SpA, Italy.
REDAELLI Tecna Spa, Italija.
The product concerned is the same as that in the original investigation and in the last investigation, which led to the imposition of measures currently in force, i.e. iron and steel ropes and cables, including locked coil ropes, excluding ropes and cables of stainless steel, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm, with fittings attached or not (in industry terminology often referred to as ‘SWR’), currently falling within CN codes ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 and ex73121098 (the ‘product concerned’).
Zadevni izdelek je isti kot v prvotni in zadnji preiskavi, ki je privedla do uvedbe trenutno veljavnih ukrepov, tj. železne ali jeklene vrvi in kabli, vključno z zaprtimi svitki vrvi, razen vrvi in kablov iz nerjavnega jekla, z največjim prečnim prerezom več kot 3 mm, s priborom ali brez njega (ki se v industrijski terminologiji pogosto navajajo kot železne ali jeklene vrvi in kabli), ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex73121081, ex73121083, ex73121085, ex73121089 in ex73121098 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek).
The current expiry review investigation confirmed that SWR produced in the Russian Federation and exported to the Union, and SWR produced and sold in the Union by the Union producers have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and end uses and are therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ta preiskava v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka je potrdila, da imajo železne ali jeklene vrvi in kabli, proizvedeni v Ruski federaciji ter izvoženi v Unijo, in železne ali jeklene vrvi in kabli, ki jih proizvajalci Unije proizvedejo in prodajajo v Uniji, iste osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter končne uporabe in se zato štejejo za podobne v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
C. LIKELIHOOD OF A CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
C. VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA ALI PONOVITVE DAMPINGA
As explained above in recital 10, it was not necessary to select a sample of exporting producers in the Russian Federation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 10, vzorca proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Ruski federaciji ni treba izbrati.
The cooperating exporting producer accounted for 99 % of the exports of the product concerned from the Russian Federation to the Union during the RIP.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik predstavlja 99 % izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Ruske federacije v Unijo med OPP.
Since two other known producers in the Russian Federation did not cooperate in the investigation, the findings on the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping set out below had to be based on the best available facts including Eurostat data, the Russian official statistics and limited data obtained from a second producer.
Glede na dejstvo, da druga dva znana proizvajalca iz Ruske federacije nista sodelovala v preiskavi, je bilo treba ugotovitve o verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga utemeljiti z razpoložljivimi dejstvi, vključno s podatki Eurostata, ruskimi uradnimi statističnimi podatki in delnimi podatki, ki so bili pridobljeni s strani drugega proizvajalca.
According to the request for review, the exports from the Russian Federation into the Union were allegedly dumped at an average margin of 130,8 %.
V skladu z zahtevkom za pregled je bila domnevna povprečna stopnja dampinga za izvoz iz Ruske federacije v Unijo 130,8 %.
As mentioned in the notice of initiation (paragraph 4.1), the applicant compared the export prices from the Russian Federation to the Union (at ex-works level) with the domestic prices in the Russian Federation.
Kot je navedeno v obvestilu o začetku (odstavek 4.1), je vložnik primerjal cene izvoza iz Ruske federacije v Unijo (na ravni franko tovarna) in domače cene v Ruski federaciji.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, it was first established for the cooperating exporting producer whether its total domestic sales of the like product to independent customers in the Russian domestic market were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales was equal to at least 5 % of the total volume of the corresponding export sales to the Union.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe se je najprej za sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika določilo, ali je bila skupna domača prodaja podobnega izdelka neodvisnim strankam na ruskem domačem trgu reprezentativna, tj. ali je celoten obseg take prodaje predstavljal vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega ustreznega izvoza v Unijo.
The domestic sales of the like product by the cooperating exporting producer were found to be overall representative.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je prodaja podobnega izdelka s strani sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika na domačem trgu v celoti reprezentativna.
Subsequently, the Commission identified those types of the like product sold domestically by the exporting producer which were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Union.
Komisija je nato določila tiste vrste podobnega izdelka, ki jih je proizvajalec izvoznik prodal na domačem trgu in so bile identične ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Unijo.
It was further examined whether the domestic sales of the cooperating exporting producer were representative for each product type, i.e. whether domestic sales of each product type constituted at least 5 % of the sales volume of the same product type to the Union.
Nato je preučila tudi, ali je domača prodaja sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika za posamezno vrsto izdelka reprezentativna, tj. ali domača prodaja posamezne vrste izdelka predstavlja vsaj 5 % obsega prodaje iste vrste izdelka v Unijo.
The examination as to whether the domestic sales of each product type, sold domestically in representative quantities, could be regarded as having been made in the OCOT was made by establishing the proportion of the profitable sales to independent customers of the type in question.
Preiskava o tem, ali bi se lahko za domačo prodajo posamezne vrste izdelka, prodanega doma v reprezentativnih količinah, štelo, kot da je bila opravljena v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine, je bila opravljena z določitvijo deleža dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam za zadevno vrsto.
For the remaining product types where domestic sales were not representative or not sold in the OCOT, normal value was constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Za preostale vrste izdelkov, katerih domača prodaja ni bila reprezentativna ali se niso prodajali v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine, je bila normalna vrednost določena v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
Normal value was constructed by adding to the manufacturing costs of the exported types, adjusted where necessary, a reasonable percentage for selling, general and administrative expenses and a reasonable margin for profit, on the basis of actual data pertaining to the production and sales of the like product in the OCOT, in accordance with the first sentence of Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da sta se proizvodnim stroškom izvoženih vrst po potrebi dodala ustrezen delež za prodajo, splošne in upravne stroške ter ustrezna stopnja dobička na podlagi dejanskih podatkov o proizvodnji in prodaji podobnega izdelka v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine v skladu s prvim stavkom člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe.
For export sales to the Union market of the cooperating Russian exporting producer made directly to the independent customers, the export price was established on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
V primerih, ko je sodelujoči ruski proizvajalec izvoznik izvažal na trg Unije in prodajal neposredno neodvisnim strankam, je bila izvozna cena določena na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo za zadevni izdelek v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
Adjustments were made to take account of all the costs incurred between the importation and resale, and for profit, to establish a reliable export price.
Za določitev zanesljive izvozne cene, so bile izvedene prilagoditve, ki upoštevajo vse stroške, nastale med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo ter dobiček.
In the absence of information from independent importers concerning the level of profits accrued during the RIP, an average profit margin of 5 % was used.
Ob pomanjkanju podatkov neodvisnih uvoznikov glede stopnje dobička, nastalega med OPP, je bila uporabljena povprečna 5-odstotna stopnja dobička.
This comparison showed the existence of dumping which amounted to 4,7 % for the exporting producer.
Ta primerjava je pokazala obstoj dampinga, ki je za proizvajalca izvoznika znašal 4,7 %.
Further to the analysis of the existence of dumping during the RIP, the likelihood of the continuation of dumping should measures be repealed was also investigated.
Poleg analize obstoja dampinga v OPP je bila preučena tudi verjetnost nadaljevanja dampinga v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov.
In this respect the following elements were analysed: the volume and prices of dumped imports from the Russian Federation, the attractiveness of the Union market and other third country markets, production capacity and excess capacity for exports in the Russian Federation.
V zvezi s tem so bili analizirani naslednji elementi: obseg in cene dampinškega uvoza iz Ruske federacije, privlačnost trga Unije in drugih tretjih trgov, proizvodna zmogljivost in razpoložljiv presežek zmogljivosti za izvoz v Ruski federaciji.
Volume and prices of dumped imports from the Russian Federation
Obseg in cene dampinškega uvoza iz Ruske federacije
According to Eurostat, during the period considered, the imports from the Russian Federation increased from 2005 tonnes in 2009 to 2343 tonnes in the RIP representing around 1 % of the Union consumption in the RIP and in the period considered.
Po podatkih Eurostata se je uvoz iz Ruske federacije v obravnavanem obdobju povečal z 2005 ton leta 2009 na 2343 ton v OPP, kar je približno 1 % potrošnje Unije v OPP in v obravnavanem obdobju.
As mentioned above in recital 33, the imports from the cooperating exporting producer were made at dumped prices (4,7 %) despite the anti-dumping duty in force.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 33, je bil uvoz sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika izveden po dampinških cenah (4,7 %) kljub veljavnim protidampinškim ukrepom.
Attractiveness of the Union market and other third country markets
Privlačnost trga Unije in drugih trgov tretjih držav
The exports to the Union constituted 3 % of the total sales of the cooperating producer, while the majority of the sales (85 %) were made on the Russian domestic market.
Izvoz v Unijo je predstavljal 3 % celotne prodaje sodelujočega izvoznika, medtem ko je bila večina prodaje (85 %) opravljena na ruskem domačem trgu.
The domestic market grew by 38 % in the period considered [7] and may further grow should the GDP of the Russian Federation continue to grow, as forecasted by publically available sources specialising on economic analysis.
Domači trg se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 38 % [7] in lahko še naprej raste, če se bo BDP Ruske federacije še naprej povečeval, kot kažejo napovedi iz javno dostopnih virov, ki so specializirani za ekonomske analize.
Moreover, the information gathered during the investigation revealed that the cooperating producer does not produce all types of the product concerned and therefore its competitive pressure on the Union producers is limited.
Poleg tega podatki, pridobljeni med preiskavo, kažejo, da sodelujoči izvoznik ne proizvaja vseh vrst zadevnega izdelka, zato je konkurenčni pritisk na proizvajalce Unije omejen.