natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Estonia, Spain (except the autonomous communities of Aragón, Castilla la Mancha, Castilla y León, Extremadura, Murcia, Navarra and La Rioja, the province of Guipuzcoa (Basque Country), the Comarcas de L'Alt Vinalopó and El Vinalopó Mitjà in the province of Alicante and the municipalities of Alborache and Turís in the province of Valencia (Comunidad Valenciana)), France (Corsica), Italy (Abruzzo, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Lazio, Liguria, Marche, Molise, Piedmont, Sardinia, Sicily, Tuscany, Umbria, Valle d'Aosta), Latvia, Portugal, Finland, United Kingdom (Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and Channel Islands),
v oddelku (d) se točki 3 in 4 nadomestita z naslednjim:
and, until 30 April 2016, Ireland (except Galway city), Italy (Apúlia, Emilia- Romagna (the provinces of Parma and Piacenza), Lombardy (except the provinces of Mantua and Sondrio), Veneto (except the provinces of Rovigo and Venice, the communes Barbona, Boara Pisani, Castelbaldo, Masi, Piacenza d'Adige, S. Urbano and Vescovana in the province of Padova and the area situated to the South of highway A4 in the province of Verona)), Lithuania (except the municipalities of Babtai and Kėdainiai (region of Kaunas)), Slovenia (except the regions Gorenjska, Koroška, Maribor and Notranjska, and the communes of Lendava and Renče-Vogrsko (south from the highway H4)), Slovakia (except the communes of Blahová, Čenkovce, Horné Mýto, Okoč, Topoľníky and Trhová Hradská (Dunajská Streda County), Hronovce and Hronské Kľačany (Levice County), Dvory nad Žitavou (Nové Zámky County), Málinec (Poltár County), Hrhov (Rožňava County), Veľké Ripňany (Topoľčany County), Kazimír, Luhyňa, Malý Horeš, Svätuše and Zatín (Trebišov County)).’;
Citrus tristeza virus (evropski sevi)
in heading (c), point 01 is replaced by the following:
Grčija (razen regionalnih enot Argolida in Chania), Malta, Portugalska (razen Algarveja in Madeire)
United Kingdom (until 30 April 2016)
Češka, Francija (Alzacija, Šampanja-Ardeni, Picardie (departma Aisne), Ile de France (občine Citry, Nanteuil-sur-Marne in Saâcy-sur-Marne) in Lorena), Italija (Apúlia (do 30. aprila 2016), Sardinija (do 30. aprila 2016), in Basilicata)“
Czech Republic, Ireland, Sweden, United Kingdom (for the Isle of Man, until 30 April 2016)’;
Člen 2
It shall apply from 1 April 2014.
UL L 169, 10.7.2000, str. 1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 708/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 708/2014
Commission Regulation (EU) No 709/2014
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 709/2014
amending Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 as regards the determination of the levels of dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 152/2009 glede določanja vsebnosti dioksinov in polikloriranih bifenilov
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules [1], and in particular Article 11(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o izvajanju uradnega nadzora, da se zagotovi preverjanje skladnosti z zakonodajo o krmi in živilih ter s pravili o zdravstvenem varstvu živali in zaščiti živali [1], ter zlasti člena 11(4) Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 [2] includes methods for the determination of the levels of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in feed.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 152/2009 [2] vključuje metode za določanje vsebnosti polikloriranih dibenzo-p-dioksinov (PCDD), polikloriranih dibenzofuranov (PCDF) in dioksinom podobnih polikloriranih bifenilov (PCB) v krmi.
Requirements should be set out concerning screening methods which identify the samples with significant levels of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs (preferably selecting samples exceeding action thresholds and ensuring the selection of samples exceeding maximum levels) and which have a high throughput.
Določiti bi bilo treba zahteve za presejalne metode, s katerimi se določijo vzorci z znatno vsebnostjo PCDD/F in dioksinom podobnih PCB (po možnosti z izbiro vzorcev, ki presegajo pragove ukrepanja, in zagotavljanjem izbire vzorcev, ki presegajo mejne vrednosti) in ki ima visoko prepustnost.
With respect to the maximum levels, the false-compliant rate of those screening methods should be below 5 %.
Glede mejnih vrednosti bi moral biti delež lažno skladnih vzorcev pri navedenih presejalnih metodah pod 5 %.
Where the results achieved with the screening method exceed the cut-off value, the original sample should be analysed by means of a method capable of identifying and quantifying the PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs contained in the sample.
Kadar rezultati, doseženi s presejalno metodo, presegajo izločitveno vrednost, bi bilo treba izvirni vzorec analizirati z metodo, ki lahko identificira in opredeli količino PCDD/F in dioksinom podobnih PCB v vzorcu.
Hereinafter such methods are referred to as ‘confirmatory methods’.
Take metode se v nadaljnjem besedilu imenujejo „potrditvene metode“.
Technical progress and developments have shown that the use of gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) should be allowed for use as a confirmatory method for checking compliance with the maximum level, in addition to gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS).
Tehnični napredek in razvoj sta pokazala, da bi bilo treba poleg plinske kromatografije/masne spektrometrije visoke ločljivosti (GC-HRMS) dovoliti uporabo plinske kromatografije/tandemske masne spektrometrije (GC-MS/MS) kot potrditvene metode za preverjanje skladnosti z mejnimi vrednostmi.
Following the experience gained with the application of the rules currently in place, an amendment is appropriate to the current provisions as regards the necessity of duplicate analysis, the judgement of compliance in case of duplicate analysis and the requirement on the acceptable difference between upper-bound and lower-bound results.
Na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih z uporabo trenutno veljavnih pravil, je ustrezna sprememba trenutnih določb glede nujnosti dvakratne analize, ocene skladnosti v primeru dvakratne analize in zahteve po sprejemljivi razliki med rezultati na zgornji meji in spodnji meji.
Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 152/2009 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Part B of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Del B Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 152/2009 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed (OJ L 54, 26.2.2009, p. 1).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 152/2009 z dne 27. januarja 2009 o določitvi metod vzorčenja in analitskih metod za uradni nadzor krme (UL L 54, 26.2.2009, str. 1).
In Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 152/2009, Part (B) ‘DETERMINATION OF THE LEVELS OF DIOXINS (PCDD/PCDF) AND PCBs’ is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi V k Uredbi (ES) št. 152/2009 se del B „DOLOČANJE RAVNI DIOKSINOV (PCDD/PCDF) IN PCB“ nadomesti z naslednjim:
DETERMINATION OF THE LEVELS OF DIOXINS (PCDD/PCDF) AND PCBs
DOLOČANJE VSEBNOSTI DIOKSINOV (PCDD/PCDF) IN PCB
The samples intended for the official control of the levels of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs), dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and non-dioxin-like PCBs in feed shall be taken in accordance with the provisions of Annex I. The quantitative requirements in relation to the control of substances or products uniformly distributed throughout the feed as provided for in point 5.1 of Annex I shall be applied.
Vzorci za uradni nadzor vsebnosti polikloriranih dibenzo-p-dioksinov (PCDD), polikloriranih dibenzofuranov (PCDF), dioksinom podobnih polikloriranih bifenilov (PCB) in dioksinom nepodobnih PCB v krmi se odvzamejo v skladu z določbami iz Priloge I. Upoštevajo se kvantitativne zahteve za nadzor snovi ali proizvodov, enakomerno razporejenih po krmi, kot je določeno v točki 5.1 Priloge I. Tako pridobljeni sestavljeni vzorci se obravnavajo kot reprezentativni za serije ali podserije, iz katerih so odvzeti.
Aggregate samples thus obtained shall be considered representative for the lots or sublots from which they are taken.
Skladnost z mejnimi vrednostmi, določenimi v Direktivi 2002/32/ES, se ugotavlja na podlagi vrednosti, ugotovljenih v laboratorijskih vzorcih.
Compliance with maximum levels laid down in Directive 2002/32/EC shall be established on the basis of the levels determined in the laboratory samples.
V tem delu B se uporabljajo opredelitve pojmov iz Priloge I k Odločbi Komisije 2002/657/ES.Poleg navedenih opredelitev se v tem delu B uporabljajo tudi naslednje opredelitve pojmov:
For the purposes of this Part B, the definitions laid down in Annex I to Commission Decision 2002/657/EC shall apply.In addition to those definitions, the following definitions shall apply for the purpose of this part B:
‚Presejalne metode‘ pomenijo metode za izbiro tistih vzorcev, katerih vsebnosti PCDD/F in dioksinom podobnih PCB presegajo mejne vrednosti ali pragove ukrepanja.
“Screening methods” means methods used for selection of those samples with levels of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs that exceed the maximum levels or the action thresholds.
Omogočati morajo stroškovno učinkovito veliko prepustnost vzorcev in tako povečati možnosti za odkrivanje novih incidentov z veliko izpostavljenostjo in nevarnostjo za zdravje potrošnikov.
They shall allow a cost-effective high sample-throughput, thus increasing the chance to discover new incidents with high exposure and health risks to consumers.
Presejalne metode temeljijo na bioanalitskih metodah ali metodah GC-MS.
Screening methods shall be based on bioanalytical or GC-MS methods.
Rezultati vzorcev, ki pri preverjanju skladnosti z mejno vrednostjo presegajo izločitveno vrednost, se preverijo s popolno ponovno analizo izvornega vzorca s potrditveno metodo.
Results from samples exceeding the cut-off value to check compliance with the maximum level shall be verified by a full re-analysis from the original sample by a confirmatory method.
‚Potrditvene metode‘ pomenijo metode, ki zagotavljajo celovite ali dopolnilne informacije o PCDD/F in dioksinom podobnih PCB ter njihovo natančno količinsko določitev pri mejni vrednosti ali po potrebi pragu za ukrepanje.
“Confirmatory methods” means methods that provide full or complementary information enabling the PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs to be identified and quantified unequivocally at the maximum or in case of need at the action threshold.
Take metode uporabljajo plinsko kromatografijo/masno spektrometrijo visoke ločljivosti (GC-HRMS) ali plinsko kromatografijo/tandemsko masno spektrometrijo (GC-MS/MS).
Such methods utilise gas chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS) or gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS).
Skladnost serije ali podserije z mejno vrednostjo
Compliance of the lot or sublot with the maximum level
Glede dioksinom nepodobnih PCB
As regards non-dioxin-like PCBs
Serija je v skladu z mejno vrednostjo, če rezultat analize ne presega mejne vrednosti dioksinom nepodobnih PCB iz Direktive 2002/32/ES ob upoštevanju merilne negotovosti.
The lot complies with the maximum level if the analytical result does not exceed the maximum level of non-dioxin-like PCBs laid down by Directive 2002/32/EC, taking into account the measurement uncertainty.
Serija ni v skladu z mejno vrednostjo, če rezultat analize na zgornji meji, potrjen z dvakratno analizo , presega mejno vrednost iz Direktive 2002/32/ES ob upoštevanju merilne negotovosti.
The lot does not comply with the maximum level if the upper-bound analytical result confirmed by duplicate analysis exceeds the maximum level laid down by Directive 2002/32/EC, taking into account the measurement uncertainty.
Povprečje dveh določanj se ob upoštevanju merilne negotovosti uporablja za preverjanje skladnosti.
The mean of two determinations, taking into account the measurement uncertainty is used for verification of compliance.The measurement uncertainty shall be taken into account according to one of the following approaches:
Merilna negotovost se upošteva po enem od naslednjih pristopov:
A lot or sublot is noncompliant if the measured value minus U is above the maximum level,
Serija ali podserija ni skladna, če je izmerjena vrednost minus U nad mejno vrednostjo,
A lot or sublot is non-compliant if the measured value is equal to or above the CCα.
Serija ali podserija ni skladna, če je izmerjena vrednost enaka ali večja od CCα.
Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall apply for the analytical result obtained on the sample for official control.
Odstavki 1, 2 in 3 se uporabljajo za rezultat analize, pridobljen na vzorcu za uradni nadzor.
The lot complies with the maximum levels if the result of a single analysis,
Serija je v skladu z mejnimi vrednostmi, če rezultat posamezne analize,
performed by a screening method with a false-compliant rate below 5 %, indicates that the level does not exceed the respective maximum level of PCDD/PCDFs and the sum of PCDD/PCDFs and dioxin-like PCBs laid down by Directive 2002/32/EC,
opravljene s presejalno metodo, pri kateri je delež lažno skladnih rezultatov manjši od 5 %, pokaže, da vsebnost ne presega zadevne mejne vrednosti PCDD/PCDF ter vsote PCDD/PCDF in dioksinom podobnih PCB iz Direktive 2002/32/ES,
For screening assays a cut-off value shall be established for decisions on sample compliance with the respective maximum levels set for either PCDD/PCDFs, or for the sum of PCDD/PCDFs and dioxin-like PCBs.
Za presejalne teste se določi izločitvena vrednost za odločitev o skladnosti vzorca z zadevnimi mejnimi vrednostmi, določenimi za PCDD/PCDF ali za vsoto PCDD/PCDF in dioksinom podobnih PCB.
The lot does not comply with the maximum level if the upper-bound analytical result obtained with a confirmatory method and confirmed by duplicate analysis exceeds the maximum level laid down by Directive 2002/32/EC, taking into account the measurement uncertainty .
Serija ni v skladu z mejno vrednostjo, če rezultat analize na zgornji meji, pridobljen s potrditveno metodo in potrjen z dvakratno analizo, presega mejno vrednost iz Direktive 2002/32/ES ob upoštevanju merilne negotovosti .
The mean of two determinations, taking into account the measurement uncertainty, is used for verification of compliance.The measurement uncertainty shall be taken into account according to one of the following approaches:
Povprečje dveh določanj se ob upoštevanju merilne negotovosti uporablja za preverjanje skladnosti.Merilna negotovost se upošteva po enem od naslednjih pristopov:
A lot or sublot is non-compliant if the measured value minus U is above the maximum level.
Serija ali podserija ni skladna, če je izmerjena vrednost minus U nad mejno vrednostjo.
Paragraphs 1 to 4 shall apply for the analytical result obtained on the sample for official control.
Odstavki od 1 do 4 se uporabljajo za rezultat analize, pridobljen na vzorcu za uradni nadzor.
Results exceeding action thresholds as laid down in Annex II to Directive 2002/32/EC
Rezultati, ki presegajo pragove ukrepanja iz Priloge II k Direktivi 2002/32/ES
Action thresholds serve as a tool for the selection of samples in those cases where it is necessary to identify a source of contamination and to take measures to reduce or eliminate it.
Pragovi ukrepanja so orodje za izbiro vzorcev v tistih primerih, ko je treba določiti vir kontaminacije in sprejeti ukrepe za njeno zmanjšanje ali odpravo.
Screening methods shall establish appropriate cut-off values for the selection of those samples.
S presejalnimi metodami se določijo ustrezne izločitvene vrednosti za izbiro navedenih vzorcev.
In case significant efforts are necessary to identify a source and to reduce or eliminate the contamination, it might be appropriate to confirm exceedance of the action thresholds is confirmed by duplicate analysis using a confirmatory method and taking into account the measurement uncertainty.
Če so za določitev vira kontaminacije in zmanjšanje ali odpravo kontaminacije potrebna precejšnja prizadevanja, je morda prekoračitev pragov ukrepanja primerno potrditi z dvakratno analizo s potrditveno metodo ob upoštevanju merilne negotovosti.
Sample preparation and requirements for methods of analysis used in official control of the levels of dioxins (PCDD/PCDF) and dioxin-like PCBs in feed
Priprava vzorca in zahteve za analitske metode pri uradnem nadzoru vsebnosti dioksinov (PCDD/PCDF) in dioksinom podobnih PCB v krmi
The requirements set out in this Chapter shall be applied where feed is analysed for the official control of the levels of 2,3,7,8-substituted polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (dioxin-like PCBs) and for other regulatory purposes.
Zahteve iz tega poglavja se uporabijo, kadar se krma analizira za uradni nadzor vsebnosti 2,3,7,8-substituiranih polikloriranih dibenzo-p-dioksinov in polikloriranih dibenzofuranov (PCDD/F) ter dioksinom podobnih polikloriranih bifenilov (dioksinom podobnih PCB) in za druge regulativne namene.
Monitoring for the presence of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs in feed may be performed with two different types of analytical methods:
Prisotnost PCDD/F in dioksinom podobnih PCB v krmi se lahko spremlja z dvema različnima vrstama analitskih metod:
The goal of screening methods is to select those samples with levels of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs that exceed the maximum levels or the action thresholds.
Cilj presejalnih metod je izbrati tiste vzorce, katerih vsebnosti PCDD/F in dioksinom podobnih PCB presegajo mejne vrednosti ali pragove ukrepanja.
Screening methods should allow cost-effective high sample-throughput, thus increasing the chance to discover new incidents with high exposure and health risks of consumers.
Presejalne metode morajo omogočati stroškovno učinkovito veliko prepustnost vzorcev in tako povečati možnosti za odkrivanje novih incidentov z veliko izpostavljenostjo in nevarnostjo za zdravje potrošnikov.
Their application should aim at avoiding false-compliant results.
Z njihovo uporabo naj bi se izognili lažno skladnim rezultatom.
They may comprise bioanalytical and GC-MS methods.
Lahko vključujejo bioanalitske metode in metode GC-MS.
Screening methods compare the analytical result with a cut-off value, providing a yes/no-decision over possible exceedance of the maximum level or action threshold.
Potrditvene metode primerjajo rezultat analize z izločitveno vrednostjo in omogočajo jasno odločitev o morebitni prekoračitvi mejne vrednosti ali praga ukrepanja.
The concentration of PCDD/Fs and the sum of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs in samples suspected to be non-compliant with the maximum level must be determined/confirmed by a confirmatory method.
Koncentracijo PCDD/F ter vsoto PCDD/F in dioksinom podobnih PCB v vzorcih, za katere se domneva, da niso v skladu z mejno vrednostjo, je treba določiti/potrditi s potrditveno metodo.
In addition, screening methods may give an indication of the levels of PCDD/Fs and dl-PCBs present in the sample.
Poleg tega lahko presejalne metode nakažejo vsebnost PCDD/F in dioksinom podobnih PCB v vzorcu.
In case of application of bioanalytical screening methods the result is expressed as Bioanalytical Equivalents (BEQ), whereas in case of application of physico-chemical GC-MS methods it is expressed as Toxic Equivalents (TEQ).
V primeru uporabe bioanalitskih presejalnih metod se rezultat izrazi v bioanalitskih ekvivalentih (BEQ), v primeru uporabe fizikalno-kemijskih metod GC-MS pa v toksičnih ekvivalentih (TEQ).
The numerically indicated results of screening methods are suitable for demonstrating compliance or suspected noncompliance or exceedance of action thresholds and give an indication of the range of levels in case of follow-up by confirmatory methods.
Številčno izraženi rezultati presejalnih metod so primerni za dokaz skladnosti ali sumljive neskladnosti ali prekoračitve pragov ukrepanja in omogočajo oceno območja vsebnosti v primeru nadaljnjih testov s potrditvenimi metodami.
They are not suitable for purposes such as evaluation of background levels, estimation of intake, following of time trends in levels or re-evaluation of action thresholds and maximum levels.
Niso primerni za namene, kot so ocenjevanje osnovnih vrednosti, ocenjevanje vnosa, spremljanje časovnih trendov vsebnosti ali ponovno ocenjevanje pragov ukrepanja in mejnih vrednosti.
Confirmatory methods allow the unequivocal identification and quantification of PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs present in a sample and provide full information at congener level.
Potrditvene metode omogočajo nedvoumno identifikacijo in kvantifikacijo PCDD/F in dioksinom podobnih PCB, prisotnih v vzorcu, in zagotavljajo celovite informacije na ravni kongenera.
Therefore, these methods allow the control of maximum levels and action thresholds, including the confirmation of results obtained by screening methods.
Zato te metode omogočajo nadzor mejnih vrednosti in pragov ukrepanja, vključno s potrditvijo rezultatov, pridobljenih s presejalnimi metodami.
Furthermore, results may be used for other purposes such as determination of low background levels in feed monitoring, following of time trends, exposure assessment and building of a database for possible re-evaluation of action thresholds and maximum levels.
Poleg tega se rezultati lahko uporabljajo za druge namene, na primer za določitev nizkih osnovnih vsebnosti v krmi po spremljanje časovnih gibanj, oceno izpostavljenosti ter vzpostavitev zbirke podatkov za morebitno ponovno oceno pragov ukrepanja in mejnih vrednosti.
Such methods utilise GC-HRMS.
Take metode uporabljajo GC-HRMS.
For confirming compliance or non-compliance with the maximum level, also GC-MS/MS can be used.
Za določitev skladnosti ali neskladnosti z mejno vrednostjo se lahko uporabi tudi GC-MS/MS.
For calculation of Toxic Equivalent (TEQ) concentrations, the concentrations of the individual substances in a given sample shall be multiplied by their respective Toxic Equivalency Factor (TEF) (see footnote (1)* of Chapter I) and subsequently summed to give the total concentration of dioxin-like compounds expressed as TEQs.
Za izračun koncentracij toksičnega ekvivalenta (TEQ) se koncentracije posameznih snovi v danem vzorcu pomnožijo z njihovim ustreznim faktorjem toksične ekvivalentnosti (TEF, glej opombo(1)* iz poglavja I), in se nato seštejejo, da se dobi skupna koncentracija dioksinom podobnih spojin, izraženih kot toksični ekvivalenti (TEQ).
For the purposes of this Part B, the accepted specific limit of quantification of an individual congener means the lowest content of the analyte that can be measured with reasonable statistical certainty, fulfilling the identification criteria as described in internationally recognised standards, for example, in standard EN 16215:2012 (Animal feed — Determination of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs by GC-HRMS and of indicator PCBs by GC-HRMS) and/or in EPA methods 1613 and 1668 as revised.
V tem delu B sprejemljiva specifična meja določanja posameznega kongenera pomeni najnižjo vsebnost analita, ki se lahko izmeri s sprejemljivo statistično gotovostjo, ki izpolnjuje merila za identifikacijo, kot so opisana v mednarodno priznanih standardih, na primer v standardu EN 2012: 16215 (Krma – Določanje dioksinov in dioksinom podobnih PCB z GC-HRMS in indikatorjev PCB z GC-HRMS) in/ali v metodah EPA 1613 in 1668, kakor so bile revidirane.
the concentration of an analyte in the extract of a sample which produces an instrumental response at two different ions to be monitored with a S/N (signal/noise) ratio of 3:1 for the less intensive raw data signal;
točka najnižje koncentracije na umeritveni krivulji, ki omogoča sprejemljivo (≤ 30 %) in dosledno (merjeno vsaj na začetku in na koncu analitične serije vzorcev) odstopanje od povprečnega faktorja relativnega odziva, izračunanega za vse točke na umeritveni krivulji v vsaki seriji vzorcev, če zaradi tehničnih razlogov izračun signal/šum ne zagotovi zanesljivih rezultatov.