natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, although Union citizens thus disenfranchised retain the right to elect members of the European Parliament, they do not have the right to participate in the national processes leading to the composition of national governments, the members of which compose the Council, the Union’s other co-legislator.
Poleg tega državljani Unije, ki na tak način izgubijo volilno pravico, sicer obdržijo pravico voliti poslance Evropskega parlamenta, nimajo pa pravice sodelovati v nacionalnih postopkih za oblikovanje nacionalnih vlad, katerih člani sestavljajo Svet, ki je eden od sozakonodajalcev Unije.
This loss of the right to vote in national elections in the country of nationality because of the exercise of the right to move in another EU country is perceived by Union citizens as a gap in their political rights.
Ta izguba pravice voliti na nacionalnih volitvah v državi državljanstva zaradi uresničevanja pravice do prostega gibanja v drugi državi EU je po mnenju državljanov Unije pomanjkljivost njihovih političnih pravic.
In the EU Citizenship Report 2013 ‘EU citizens: your rights, your future’ [2] the Commission underlined that full participation of Union citizens in the democratic life of the Union at all levels is the very essence of Union citizenship.
V Poročilu o državljanstvu EU iz leta 2013 „Državljani EU: vaše pravice, vaša prihodnost“ [2] je Komisija poudarila, da je polno sodelovanje državljanov Unije na vseh ravneh demokratičnega življenja Unije sâmo bistvo državljanstva Unije.
The Commission announced that it would propose constructive ways to enable EU citizens living in another MemberStateto fully participate in the democratic life of the EU by maintaining their right to vote in national elections in their country of origin.
Napovedala je, da bo predlagala konstruktivne načine, kako državljanom EU, ki živijo v drugih državah članicah, omogočiti polno sodelovanje v demokratičnem življenju EU s tem, da bodo ohranili pravico voliti na nacionalnih volitvah v njihovi izvorni državi.
The right to vote is a basic civil right.
Aktivna volilna pravica je temeljna državljanska pravica.
As acknowledged by the European Court of Human Rights, the right to vote is not a privilege.
Kakor je poudarilo Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice, aktivna volilna pravica ni privilegij.
Any general, automatic and indiscriminate departure from the principle of universal suffrage risks undermining the democratic validity of the legislature thus elected and the laws it promulgates [3].
Vsako splošno, samodejno in nekritično odstopanje od načela splošne volilne pravice pomeni tveganje, ki slabi demokratično legitimnost tako izvoljenega zakonodajalca in zakonov, ki jih sprejme [3].
The presumption in a democratic State should thus be in favour of inclusion.
V demokratični državi bi zato morala obstajati pravna domneva v korist vključenosti.
This Court has further found that there is a clear trend in favour of allowing voting by non-resident nationals, even though no common European approach exists yet.
Sodišče je poleg tega opozorilo na obstoj jasne težnje, da se omogoči glasovanje na volitvah državljanom nerezidentom, čeprav v Evropi na tem področju zaenkrat še ni skupnega pristopa.
The rules currently applicable in certain Member States may lead to a situation where Union citizens residing in other Member States could lose their right to vote solely on the ground that they have been residing abroad for a certain period of time.
Na podlagi predpisov, ki trenutno veljajo v nekaterih državah članicah, se lahko zgodi, da državljani Unije, ki prebivajo v drugih državah članicah, izgubijo aktivno volilno pravico izključno zato, ker določen čas prebivajo v tujini.
This is based on the presumption that residence abroad of a given duration means that the connection with the political process in the home country is lost.
To temelji na domnevi, v skladu s katero določeno obdobje prebivanja v tujini pomeni, da je bila povezava s političnim procesom v matični državi prekinjena.
This presumption is, however, not correct in every individual case.
Vendar ta domneva v vseh primerih ne drži.
Therefore, it might be appropriate to give citizens who risk becoming disenfranchised the possibility to demonstrate their continuing interest in the political life in the Member State of which they are nationals.
Zato bi utegnilo biti primerno dati državljanom, ki tvegajo izgubo volilne pravice, možnost, da izkažejo trajno zanimanje za politično življenje v državi članici, katere državljani so.
Union citizens residing in another MemberStatecan maintain lifelong and close ties with their country of origin and may continue to be directly affected by acts adopted by the legislature elected there.
Državljani Unije, ki prebivajo v drugi državi članici, lahko ohranijo tesne in vseživljenjske vezi z izvorno državo, v kateri jih utegnejo ukrepi zakonodajnega organa, izvoljenega v tej državi, še naprej neposredno zadevati.
The widespread access to television broadcast across borders and the availability of internet and other web-based and mobile communication technologies make it easier than ever to follow closely and take part in social and political developments in the home MemberState.
Splošni dostop do televizijskih programov prek meja matične države ter razpoložljivost interneta in drugih spletnih in mobilnih komunikacijskih tehnologij omogočajo, da je lažje kot kdaj koli prej pozorno spremljati družbeni in politični razvoj dogodkov v matični državi članici ter pri njem sodelovati.
The rationale of policies that disenfranchise citizens should be reassessed in the light of current socioeconomic and technological realities, the current trend towards inclusive political participation and the present state of European integration, along with the prime importance of the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union and the right to free movement.
Utemeljitev politik, na podlagi katerih državljani izgubijo volilno pravico, bi bilo treba ponovno oceniti v luči trenutnih socialno-ekonomskih in tehnoloških razmer, trenutnih teženj k vključujočemu političnemu udejstvovanju in trenutnega stanja na področju evropskega povezovanja, in sicer skupaj z bistvenim pomenom pravice do sodelovanja v demokratičnem življenju Unije in pravice do prostega gibanja.
A more inclusive and proportionate approach would consist in ensuring that citizens who make use of their right to free movement and residence in the Union can retain their right to vote in national elections when they demonstrate a continuing interest in the political life in the Member State of which they are nationals.
Bolj vključujoč in sorazmeren pristop bi pomenil, da se državljanom, ki uresničujejo svojo pravico do prostega gibanja in prebivanja v Uniji, zagotovi možnost, da obdržijo pravico voliti na nacionalnih volitvah, kadar izkažejo trajno zanimanje za politično življenje v državi članici, katere državljani so.
A positive action on the part of the individuals such as their application to remain registered on the electoral roll of their Member State of origin should be considered as an appropriate criterion — and the simplest means — for the purposes of demonstrating a continuing interest in the national political life, without prejudice to the possibility for those Member States to request their citizens to renew such applications at appropriate intervals, so confirming the persistence of such an interest.
Aktivno ravnanje posameznikov, na primer vložitev vloge za ohranitev vpisanosti v volilni imenik njihove izvorne države, bi bilo treba šteti kot ustrezno merilo – in najpreprostejšo rešitev – za namene izkazovanja neprekinjenega zanimanja za politično življenje v domači državi članici. Ne bi pa smelo posegati v možnost navedene države članice, da od svojih državljanov zahteva, naj te vloge v ustreznih časovnih presledkih ponovno vložijo in tako potrdijo trajnost zanimanja.
To minimise the burden for citizens abroad, the lodging of their applications to register or remain registered on the electoral roll should be possible through electronic means.
Da bi bilo breme državljanov v tujini čim manjše, bi jim bilo treba omogočiti, da vloge za ohranitev vpisanosti v volilni imenik oddajajo v elektronski obliki.
It would be important to ensure timely and appropriate information of citizens moving to or residing in another Member State about the conditions under which they can retain their voting rights and about the corresponding practical arrangements,
Državljanom, ki se preselijo v drugo državo članico oziroma v njej prebivajo, bi bilo treba zagotoviti pravočasne in ustrezne informacije o pogojih, pod katerimi lahko ohranijo volilno pravico, in ustreznih praktičnih rešitvah –
Where Member States’ policies limit the rights of nationals to vote in national elections based exclusively on a residence condition, Member States should enable their nationals who make use of their right to free movement and residence in the Union to demonstrate a continuing interest in the political life in the Member State of which they are nationals, including through an application to remain registered on the electoral roll, and by doing so, to retain their right to vote.
Če države članice s politikami omejujejo pravico svojih državljanov, da volijo na nacionalnih volitvah, izključno na podlagi pogoja prebivališča, bi svojim državljanom, ki uresničujejo pravico do prostega gibanja in prebivanja v Uniji, morale omogočiti, da ohranijo aktivno volilno pravico, če izkazujejo trajno zanimanje za politično življenje v državi članici, katere državljani so, tudi z vlogo za ohranitev vpisanosti v volilni imenik.
Where Member States allow their nationals residing in another MemberStateto retain their right to vote in national elections through an application to remain registered on the electoral roll, this should be without prejudice to the possibility for those Member States to put in place proportionate accompanying arrangements, such as reapplication at appropriate intervals.
Če države članice svojim državljanom s prebivališčem v drugi državi članici dovoljujejo, da obdržijo pravico voliti na nacionalnih volitvah na podlagi vloge za ohranitev vpisanosti v volilni imenik, to ne bi smelo vplivati na možnost navedenih držav članic, da sprejmejo sorazmerne spremljevalne ukrepe, na primer določijo obveznost ponovne vložitve vloge za ohranitev vpisanosti v ustreznih časovnih presledkih.
Member States that allow their nationals residing in another MemberStateto retain their right to vote in national elections through an application or a reapplication to remain registered on the electoral roll should ensure that all relevant applications may be submitted electronically.
Države članice, ki svojim državljanom s prebivališčem v drugi državi članici dovoljujejo, da obdržijo pravico voliti na nacionalnih volitvah na podlagi (ponovne) vloge za ohranitev vpisanosti v volilni imenik, bi morale zagotoviti, da se lahko vse ustrezne vloge oddajo v elektronski obliki.
Member States providing for the loss of the right to vote in national elections by their nationals residing in another MemberStateshould inform them by appropriate means and in a timely manner about the conditions and the practical arrangements for retaining their right to vote in national elections.
Države članice, ki svojim državljanom s prebivališčem v drugi državi članici odvzamejo pravico voliti na nacionalnih volitvah, bi jih morale pravočasno in na ustrezen način obvestiti o pogojih in praktičnih rešitvah za ohranitev pravice voliti na nacionalnih volitvah.
Done at Brussels, 29 January 2014.
V Bruslju, 29. januarja 2014
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 7 May 2013 in case Shindler.
Sodba Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice z dne 7. maja 2013 v zadevi Shindler.
on measures to control Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte in Union areas where its presence is confirmed
glede ukrepov za obvladovanje koruznega hrošča Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte na območjih Unije, kjer je njegova navzočnost potrjena
Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte (hereinafter: ‘Diabrotica’) is a non-native insect pest of maize.
Koruzni hrošč Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: koruzni hrošč) ni avtohton škodljivi organizem na koruzi.
It has spread and established in over half of the Union maize growing area.
Razširil in naselil se je na več kot polovici površin za pridelovanje koruze v Uniji.
The measures to prevent the spread of Diabrotica within the Union carried out pursuant to Commission Decision 2003/766/EC [1] did not prove to be successful.
Ukrepi za preprečevanje širjenja koruznega hrošča v Uniji, ki so se izvajali v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2003/766/ES [1], se niso izkazali za uspešne.
Moreover, according to an impact assessment carried out by the Commission it is neither feasible to pursue an eradication of this pest from the Union territory nor to prevent its further spread into the areas which are currently free from that harmful organism.
Poleg tega na podlagi ocene učinka, ki jo je opravila Komisija, ni mogoče si niti prizadevati za njegovo izkoreninjenje z območja Unije niti preprečevati njegovo širjenje na območja, ki trenutno niso napadena z navedenim škodljivim organizmom.
Therefore the Commission has decided by Implementing Directive 2014/19/EU [2] and Implementing Decision 2014/62/EU [3] to withdraw the recognition of Diabrotica as a regulated harmful organism with quarantine status, by deleting it from Annex I to Council Directive 2000/29/EC [4], and to repeal Decision 2003/766/EC, respectively.
Zato se je Komisija odločila preklicati priznanje koruznega hrošča kot reguliranega karantenskega škodljivega organizma s sprejetjem Izvedbene direktive 2014/19/EU [2], s katero se koruzni hrošč črta iz Priloge I k Direktivi Sveta 2000/29/ES [3], in Izvedenega sklepa 2014/62/EU [4], ki razveljavlja Odločbo 2003/766/ES.
Under Decision 2003/766/EC crop rotation was compulsory only for the eradication of isolated outbreaks of Diabrotica.
Na podlagi Odločbe 2003/766/ES je bilo kolobarjenje obvezno samo za izkoreninjenje izoliranih izbruhov koruznega hrošča.
Nevertheless, scientific studies have shown that crop rotation is the most effective technique to also slow down the spread of Diabrotica and to reduce its impact.
Kljub temu so znanstvene študije pokazale, da je kolobarjenje najučinkovitejša tehnika tudi za upočasnitev širjenja koruznega hrošča in zmanjšanje njegovega učinka.
In addition to being an effective method to control Diabrotica, crop rotation has several other advantages from an environmental point of view.
Poleg tega, da je učinkovita metoda za nadzor koruznega hrošča, ima tudi več drugih prednosti z okoljskega vidika.
These include the improvement or maintenance of soil fertility and structure, and the breaking of pest and weed cycles with the potential to reduce the farmers’ reliance on chemical inputs of fertilisers and plant protection products.
Te vključujejo izboljšanje ali ohranjanje rodovitnosti tal in strukture ter prekinitev ciklov škodljivcev in plevela, kar lahko vpliva na to, da kmetje zmanjšajo uporabo gnojil in fitofarmacevtskih sredstev.
Consequently, crop rotation has also a positive impact on water and air quality, and on biodiversity.
Tako pozitivno vpliva tudi na kakovost vode in zraka ter na biotsko raznovrstnost.
However, from other studies carried out on this pest, it became clear that with its further spread there is a potential for increased reliance on insecticides, since in some cases it may be difficult to find an economically attractive alternative crop to maize in the rotation.
Vendar je iz drugih študij, opravljenih s tem škodljivim organizmom, postalo jasno, da se lahko zaradi njegovega nadaljnjega širjenja poveča uporaba insekticidov, saj je v nekaterih primerih težko najti ekonomsko ugodno alternativo koruzi v kolobarju.
Therefore, an effective and sustainable control of Diabrotica should be envisaged by Member States, also after the withdrawal of the recognition of Diabrotica as a regulated harmful organism with quarantine status.
Zato bi morale države članice načrtovati učinkovito in trajnostno obvladovanje koruznega hrošča, tudi po preklicu njegovega priznanja kot reguliranega karantenskega škodljivega organizma.
Article 14 of Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] provides for Member States to establish appropriate incentives to encourage professional users to implement, on a voluntary basis, crop or sector specific guidelines for integrated pest management, which should be drawn up by public authorities or organisations representing particular professional users.
Člen 14 Direktive 2009/128/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5] določa, da morajo države članice uvesti ustrezne spodbude, s katerimi poklicne uporabnike spodbudijo k prostovoljnemu izvajanju smernic integriranega varstva rastlin pred škodljivimi organizmi za posamezne kmetijske rastline ali sektorje, ki naj bi jih pripravili javni organi ali organizacije, ki zastopajo določene poklicne uporabnike.
Pursuant to the general principles of integrated pest management, prevention of the occurrence of pests has a key role in reducing the need of intervention with plant protection products.
V skladu s splošnimi načeli integriranega varstva rastlin ima preprečevanje pojava škodljivega organizma ključno vlogo pri zmanjšanju potrebe po uporabi fitofarmacevtskih sredstev.
Moreover, sustainable biological, physical and other non-chemical methods should be preferred to chemical methods, if they provide adequate pest control.
Poleg tega bi morale trajnostne biološke, fizikalne in druge nekemične metode imeti prednost pred kemičnimi metodami, če zagotavljajo ustrezno obvladovanje škodljivega organizma.
In accordance with these general principles of integrated pest management, application of crop rotation, of appropriate monitoring of Diabrotica populations and other relevant measures preventing spreading of harmful organisms, such as hygiene measures as cleansing the agricultural machinery, should be included in crop or sector-specific guidelines.
V skladu s temi splošnimi načeli integriranega varstva rastlin pred škodljivimi organizmi bi bilo treba kolobarjenje, ustrezno spremljanje populacij koruznega hrošča in druge ustrezne ukrepe za preprečevanje širjenja škodljivih organizmov, kot so higienski ukrepi, npr. čiščenje kmetijskih strojev, vključiti v smernice za posamezne kmetijske rastline ali sektorje.
Furthermore, in order to enhance the respect by users of Article 55 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] where insecticides are used to control Diabrotica, crop or sector specific guidelines for integrated pest management concerning this pest should be in line with the rules on proper use of plant protection products as set out in that provision.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba za to, da bi uporabniki bolj upoštevali člen 55 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], v skladu s katerim se lahko insekticidi uporabljajo za obvladovanje koruznega hrošča, smernice integriranega varstva rastlin pred koruznim hroščem za posamezne kmetijske rastline ali sektorje uskladiti s pravili o pravilni uporabi fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, kot je določeno v navedeni določbi.
Professional users of plant protection products should have at their disposal information and tools for monitoring Diabrotica, as well as advisory services on integrated pest management, including specific prevention and control methods for Diabrotica.
Poklicni uporabniki fitofarmacevtskih sredstev bi morali imeti na voljo informacije in opremo za spremljanje koruznega hrošča ter dostop do svetovalnih storitev glede integriranega varstva rastlin pred škodljivimi organizmi, vključno s posebnimi metodami za preprečevanje širjenja in obvladovanje koruznega hrošča.
The results of the monitoring should help farmers to decide whether and when there is still need to apply plant protection measures.
Rezultati spremljanja bi morali kmetom pomagati pri odločitvi, ali in kdaj naj uporabijo fitofarmacevtska sredstva.
It is relevant that robust and scientifically sound Diabrotica population threshold values are defined for a region, since these are essential components for decision making.
Pomembno je, da so za posamezne regije določne zanesljive in znanstveno utemeljene mejne vrednosti za populacije koruznega hrošča, saj so ključnega pomena pri odločanju.
Member States ensuring, in compliance with Article 5 of Directive 2009/128/EC, that all professional users have access to training on specific subjects should therefore include also the provisions of this Recommendation in the respective training programme.
Države članice, ki v skladu s členom 5 Direktive 2009/128/ES zagotovijo, da imajo vsi poklicni uporabniki dostop do usposabljanja o posameznih področjih, bi morale v svoje programe usposabljanja vključiti določbe tega priporočila.
Research and technological development on tools for the sustainable control of Diabrotica should be promoted to ensure more cost effective and environmentally sustainable measures against that harmful organism,
Raziskave in tehnološki razvoj na področju opreme za trajnostno obvladovanje koruznega hrošča bi bilo treba spodbujati, da se zagotovijo stroškovno bolj učinkoviti in okoljsko bolj trajnostni ukrepi proti temu škodljivemu organizmu –
Member States should take into account the general principles of integrated pest management laid down in Annex III to Directive 2009/128/EC for the control of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte (hereinafter ‘Diabrotica’) in Union areas where its presence is confirmed.
Države članice naj upoštevajo splošna načela o integriranem varstvu rastlin pred škodljivimi organizmi iz Priloge III k Direktivi 2009/128/ES za obvladovanje koruznega hrošča Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte (v nadaljnjem besedilu: koruzni hrošč) na območjih Unije, kjer je njegova navzočnost potrjena.
For the purposes of this Recommendation ‘control’ means the suppression of the population density of the pest to a level not causing significant economic losses, with a view to ensuring an economically sustainable production of maize.
V tem priporočilu „obvladovanje“ pomeni zatiranje populacijske gostote škodljivega organizma na raven, ki ne povzroča znatne gospodarske izgube, da se zagotovi gospodarsko trajnostna proizvodnja koruze.
Member States should ensure that the crop or sector specific guidelines for integrated pest management, drawn up by public authorities or organisations representing particular professional users, concerning Diabrotica addressed to farmers of maize and professional users of plant protection products are in line with the rules on proper use of plant protection products as set out in Article 55 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Države članice naj zagotovijo, da so smernice integriranega varstva rastlin pred koruznim hroščem za posamezne kmetijske rastline ali sektorje, ki jih za pridelovalce koruze in poklicne uporabnike fitofarmacevtskih sredstev pripravijo javni organi ali organizacije, ki zastopajo določene poklicne uporabnike, v skladu s pravili o pravilni uporabi fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, kot so določena v členu 55 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
Sustainable biological, physical and other non-chemical methods should be preferred to chemical methods, if the former provide satisfactory pest control.
Trajnostne biološke, fizikalne in druge nekemične metode naj imajo prednost pred kemičnimi metodami, če zagotavljajo ustrezno obvladovanje škodljivega organizma.
Therefore, control of Diabrotica by the professional users should be achieved or supported by the following actions:
Zato lahko poklicni uporabniki pri obvladovanju koruznega hrošča uporabijo naslednje ukrepe:
crop rotation;
kolobarjenje;
use of biocontrol agents;
uporaba bioloških sredstev;
adaptation of maize sowing date to avoid that germination coincides with larval hatching;
prilagoditev obdobja sajenja koruze, s čimer se preprečiti, da kalivost sovpada z obdobjem valjenja larv;
cleansing of agricultural machinery and removal of volunteer maize plants and other hygiene measures.
čiščenje kmetijskih strojev in odstranjevanje samoraslih rastlin koruze ter drugi higienski ukrepi.