natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, provision should be made for reducing the minimum time limits in line with the rules set by the GPA and subject to the condition that they are compatible with the specific mode of transmission envisaged at Union level.
Zato bi bilo treba omogočiti skrajšanje minimalnih rokov, in sicer v skladu s pravili iz Sporazuma GPA ter pod pogojem, da so ti roki skladni s posebnim načinom pošiljanja, določenim na ravni Unije.
Furthermore, contracting authorities should have the opportunity to further shorten the time limits for receipt of requests to participate and of tenders in cases where a state of urgency renders the regular time limits impracticable, but does not make a regular procedure with publication impossible.
Javni naročniki bi morali imeti tudi možnost, da dodatno skrajšajo roke za prejem prijav za sodelovanje in ponudb, če v nujnih primerih ni možno upoštevati rednih rokov, a je redni postopek z objavo obvestila še vedno možen.
Only in exceptional situations where extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority concerned that are not attributable to that contracting authority makes it impossible to conduct a regular procedure even with shortened time limits, contracting authorities should, in so far as strictly necessary, have the possibility to award contracts by negotiated procedure without prior publication.
Le v izjemnih primerih, če zaradi skrajne nujnosti, nastale zaradi dogodkov, ki jih zadevni javni naročnik ni mogel predvideti in mu zanje ni mogoče pripisati odgovornosti, rednega postopka ni možno izvesti niti s skrajšanimi roki, bi morali javni naročniki, kolikor je zares nujno, imeti možnost, da javna naročila oddajo s postopkom s pogajanji brez predhodne objave obvestila.
This might be case where natural catastrophes require immediate action.
To bi se lahko zgodilo, kadar je zaradi naravnih nesreč potrebno takojšnje ukrepanje.
It should be clarified that the need to ensure that economic operators have sufficient time in which to draw up responsive tenders may entail that the time limits which were set initially may have to be extended.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da utegne biti zaradi potrebe po zagotovitvi, da imajo gospodarski subjekti dovolj časa za pripravo sprejemljivih ponudb, potrebno podaljšanje prvotno določenih rokov.
This would, in particular, be the case where significant changes are made to the procurement documents.
Tako bi bilo zlasti v primeru bistvenih sprememb dokumentacije v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila.
It should also be specified that, in that case, significant changes should be understood as covering changes, in particular to the technical specifications, in respect of which economic operators would need additional time in order to understand and respond appropriately.
Prav tako bi bilo treba pojasniti, da bi morali v tem primeru bistvene spremembe razumeti kot celovite spremembe, zlasti tehničnih specifikacij, v zvezi s tem, kateri gospodarski subjekti bi potrebovali več časa za ustrezno obravnavo in odziv.
It should, however, be clarified that such changes should not be so substantial that the admission of candidates other than those initially selected would have been allowed for or additional participants in the procurement procedure would have been attracted.
Morali pa bi pojasniti, da take spremembe ne bi smele biti tako velike, da bi omogočile sodelovanje drugih kandidatov, ki prvotno niso bili izbrani, ali da bi v postopek javnega naročanja pritegnile dodatne udeležence.
That could, in particular, be the case where the changes render the contract or the framework agreement materially different in character from the one initially set out in the procurement documents.
To bi se zgodilo zlasti v primeru, če bi se zaradi teh sprememb javno naročilo ali okvirni sporazum bistveno razlikovala od prvotno zasnovane oblike v dokumentaciji v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila.
It should be clarified that the information concerning certain decisions taken during a procurement procedure, including the decision not to award a contract or not to conclude a framework agreement, should be sent by the contracting authorities, without candidates or tenderers having to request such information.
Treba bi bilo pojasniti, da bi morali javni naročniki poslati informacije glede nekaterih odločitev, sprejetih med postopkom javnega naročanja, vključno z odločitvijo o tem, da ne oddajo javnega naročila ali ne sklenejo okvirnega sporazuma, ne da bi kandidati ali ponudniki zanje morali zaprositi.
It should also be recalled that Council Directive 89/665/EEC [14] provides for an obligation for contracting authorities, again without candidates or tenderer having to request it, to provide the candidates and tenderers concerned with a summary of the relevant reasons for some of the central decisions that are taken in the course of a procurement procedure.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba tudi, da morajo javni naročniki v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 89/665/EGS [14] zadevnim kandidatom in ponudnikom poslati povzetek ustreznih razlogov za nekatere ključne odločitve, sprejete v postopku javnega naročanja, ne da bi ti zanj morali zaprositi.
It should finally be clarified that candidates and tenderers should be able to request more detailed information concerning those reasons, which contracting authorities should be required to give except where there would be serious grounds for not doing so.
Na koncu bi bilo treba pojasniti, da bi kandidati in ponudniki morali imeti možnost, da zaprosijo za podrobnejše informacije glede teh razlogov, ki bi jim jih javni naročniki morali priskrbeti, razen če obstajajo tehtni razlogi proti temu.
Those grounds should be set out in this Directive.
Ti razlogi bi morali biti določeni v tej direktivi.
To ensure the necessary transparency in the context of procurement procedures involving negotiations and dialogues with tenderers, tenderers having made an admissible tender should, except where there would be serious grounds for not doing so, also be enabled to request information on the conduct and progress of the procedure.
Da bi zagotovili potrebno transparentnost v okviru postopkov javnega naročanja, ki vključujejo pogajanja in dialoge s ponudniki, bi morali ponudniki, ki so predložili dopustno ponudbo, prav tako imeti možnost, da zaprosijo za informacije o poteku in napredovanju postopka, razen če obstajajo tehtni razlogi proti temu.
Overly demanding requirements concerning economic and financial capacity frequently constitute an unjustified obstacle to the involvement of SMEs in public procurement.
Prestroge zahteve glede ekonomske in finančne zmogljivosti pogosto pomenijo neutemeljeno oviro za vključitev MSP v javno naročanje.
Any such requirements should be related and proportionate to the subject-matter of the contract.
Vse take zahteve bi morale biti povezane in sorazmerne s predmetom javnega naročila.
In particular, contracting authorities should not be allowed to require economic operators to have a minimum turnover that would be disproportionate to the subject-matter of the contract; the requirement should normally not exceed at the most twice the estimated contract value.
Zlasti se javnim naročnikom ne bi smelo dovoliti, da bi od gospodarskih subjektov zahtevali minimalni promet, ki bi bil nesorazmeren s predmetom javnega naročila; zahteva načeloma ne bi smela preseči največ dvojne ocenjene vrednosti javnega naročila.
However, in duly justified circumstances, it should be possible to apply higher requirements.
Vendar bi moralo biti mogoče, da se v ustrezno utemeljenih okoliščinah uporabljajo strožje zahteve.
Such circumstances might relate to the high risks attached to the performance of the contract or the fact that its timely and correct performance is critical, for instance because it constitutes a necessary preliminary for the performance of other contracts.
Take okoliščine se lahko nanašajo na velika tveganja, povezana z izvedbo javnega naročila, ali dejstvo, da je njegova pravočasna in pravilna izvedba nujna, ker je na primer izhodišče za izvedbo drugih javnih naročil.
In such duly justified cases contracting authorities should remain free to decide autonomously whether higher minimum turnover requirements would be appropriate and pertinent without being subject to administrative or judicial supervision.
V takih ustrezno utemeljenih primerih o ustreznosti in primernosti zahtev po višjem minimalnem prometu bi morali samostojno odločati javni naročniki, ne da bi bili pri tem izpostavljeni upravnemu ali sodnemu nadzoru.
Where higher minimum turnover requirements are to be applied, contracting authorities should remain free to set the level as long as it is related and proportionate to the subject-matter of the contract.
Če se uporabljajo zahteve po višjem minimalnem prometu, bi morali javni naročniki samostojno določiti stopnjo, ki pa bi morala biti povezana in sorazmerna s predmetom javnega naročila.
Where the contracting authority decides that the minimum turnover requirement should be set at a level higher than twice the estimated contract value, the individual report or the procurement documents should contain an indication of the main reasons for the contracting authority’s choice.
Če se javni naročnik odloči, da bi bilo treba zahtevati višjo stopnjo minimalnega prometa, ki presega dvojno ocenjeno vrednost javnega naročila, bi moralo posamezno poročilo ali dokumentacija v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila vsebovati navedbo glavnih razlogov za odločitev javnega naročnika.
Contracting authorities should also be able to request information on the ratios, for instance, between assets and liabilities in the annual accounts.
Javni naročniki bi prav tako morali imeti možnost, da zahtevajo informacijo o deležih, na primer deležu sredstev glede na obveznosti v letnih računovodskih izkazih.
A positive ratio showing higher levels of assets than of liabilities could provide additional evidence that the financial capacity of economic operators is sufficient.
Pozitiven delež, iz katerega so razvidne višje stopnje sredstev glede na obveznosti, bi lahko bil dodatno dokazilo o zadostni finančni zmogljivosti gospodarskih subjektov.
Many economic operators, and not least SMEs, find that a major obstacle to their participation in public procurement consists in administrative burdens deriving from the need to produce a substantial number of certificates or other documents related to exclusion and selection criteria.
Številni gospodarski subjekti, tudi MSP, ugotavljajo, da so velika ovira za njihovo sodelovanje v postopkih javnega naročanja upravne obremenitve, ker je treba predložiti veliko število potrdil ali drugih dokumentov v zvezi z razlogi za izključitev in pogoji za sodelovanje.
Limiting such requirements, for example through use of a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) consisting of an updated self-declaration, could result in considerable simplification for the benefit of both contracting authorities and economic operators.
Omejitev teh zahtev, na primer z uporabo enotnega evropskega dokumenta v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila (ESPD) v obliki posodobljene lastne izjave, bi lahko pomenila precejšnjo poenostavitev, ki bi koristila javnim naročnikom in gospodarskim subjektom.
The tenderer to which it has been decided to award the contract should, however, be required to provide the relevant evidence and contracting authorities should not conclude contracts with tenderers unable to do so.
Vendar bi moral izbrani ponudnik predložiti ustrezna dokazila, javni naročniki pa ne bi smeli skleniti pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila s ponudniki, ki te zahteve ne morejo izpolniti.
Contracting authorities should also be entitled to request all or part of the supporting documents at any moment where they consider this to be necessary in view of the proper conduct of the procedure.
Javni naročniki bi morali imeti tudi možnost, da lahko v vsakem trenutku zahtevajo vsa ali nekatera dokazila, če menijo, da je to potrebno za pravilen potek postopka.
This might in particular be the case in two-stage procedures – restricted procedures, competitive procedures with negotiation, competitive dialogues and innovation partnerships - in which the contracting authorities make use of the possibility to limit the number of candidates invited to submit a tender.
To bo morda zlasti potrebno v primeru dvofaznih postopkov (omejeni postopki, konkurenčni postopki s pogajanji, konkurenčni dialogi in partnerstva za inovacije), v katerih javni naročniki uporabljajo možnost omejitve števila kandidatov, povabljenih k predložitvi ponudbe.
Requiring submission of the supporting documents at the moment of selection of the candidates to be invited could be justified to avoid that contracting authorities invite candidates which later prove unable to submit the supporting documents at the award stage, depriving otherwise qualified candidates from participation.
Zahteva po predložitvi dokazil v trenutku izbire kandidatov, ki bodo povabljeni k predložitvi ponudb, bi lahko bila upravičena, da bi se izognili temu, da bi javni naročniki povabili kandidate, pri katerih se kasneje izkaže, da ne morejo predložiti dokazil v fazi oddaje javnega naročila, s čimer se tako onemogoči sodelovanje ustreznih kandidatov.
It should be set out explicitly that the ESPD should also provide the relevant information in respect of entities on whose capacities an economic operator relies, so that the verification of the information regarding such entities can be carried out together with and on the same conditions as the verification in respect of the main economic operator.
Izrecno bi morali določiti, da bi bilo treba v ESPD zagotoviti tudi ustrezne informacije o subjektih, na zmogljivost katerih se gospodarski subjekt opira, da bi se preverjanje informacij v zvezi s temi subjekti lahko izvedlo istočasno in pod enakimi pogoji kot preverjanje v zvezi z glavnim gospodarskim subjektom.
It is important that the decisions of contracting authorities should be based on recent information, in particular as regards exclusion grounds, given that important changes can intervene quite rapidly, for instance in the event of financial difficulties which would render the economic operator unsuitable or, conversely, because an outstanding debt on social contributions would meanwhile have been paid.
Pomembno je, da odločitve javnih naročnikov temeljijo na ažurnih informacijah, zlasti kar zadeva razloge za izključitev, saj lahko dokaj hitro pride do velikih sprememb, na primer v primeru finančnih težav, zaradi katerih bi gospodarski subjekt postal neustrezen, ali nasprotno, če bi bil medtem plačan neporavnan dolg v zvezi s prispevki za socialno varnost.
It is therefore preferable that, whenever possible, contracting authorities should verify such information by accessing relevant databases, which should be national in the sense of being administered by public authorities.
Bolje bi bilo torej, da bi javni naročniki, kadar je to mogoče, preverili takšne informacije v ustreznih bazah podatkov, ki bi morale biti nacionalne, kar pomeni, da bi jih morali upravljati javni organi.
At the current stage of development, there might still be cases where doing so is not yet possible because of technical reasons.
V trenutni fazi se še lahko zgodi, da navedenega zaradi tehničnih razlogov še ni mogoče izvesti.
The Commission should therefore envisage promoting measures that could facilitate easy recourse to up-to-date information electronically, such as strengthening tools offering access to virtual company dossiers, or means of facilitating interoperability between databases or other such flanking measures.
Komisija bi zato morala preučiti možnost spodbujanja ukrepov, ki bi lahko omogočili enostaven elektronski dostop do posodobljenih informacij, kot so krepitev orodij za dostop do virtualnih map podjetij ali sredstev za lajšanje interoperabilnosti med bazami podatkov ali drugimi takšnimi spremljajočimi ukrepi.
It should also be provided that contracting authorities should not ask for still up-to-date documents, which they already possess from earlier procurement procedures.
Določiti bi bilo treba tudi, da javni naročniki ne bi smeli zahtevati še vedno ažurne dokumentacije, ki jo že imajo iz predhodnih postopkov javnega naročanja.
However, it should also be ensured that contracting authorities will not be faced with disproportionate archiving and filing burdens in this context.
Vendar pa bi bilo treba zagotoviti tudi, da pri tem javnim naročnikom z arhiviranjem in klasificiranjem ne bo naloženo nesorazmerno breme.
Consequently, implementation of this duty should only be applicable once the use of electronic means of communication is obligatory, as electronic document management will render the task much easier for contracting authorities.
Ta obveznost bi zato morala biti uvedena šele potem, ko bo postala obvezna uporaba elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev, saj bodo javni naročniki to nalogo mnogo lažje izvajali z elektronskim upravljanjem dokumentov.
Further simplification for both economic operators and contracting authorities could be obtained by means of a standard form for self-declarations, which could reduce problems linked to the precise drafting of formal statements and declarations of consent as well as language issues.
Postopek bi za gospodarske subjekte in javne naročnike lahko dodatno poenostavili z uporabo standardnih obrazcev za lastne izjave, s čimer bi lahko zmanjšali težave, povezane z natančnim oblikovanjem uradnih izjav in izjav o soglasju, ter jezikovne težave.
The Commission provides and manages an electronic system, e-Certis, which is currently updated and verified on a voluntary basis by national authorities.
Komisija zagotavlja in upravlja elektronski sistem e-Certis, ki ga trenutno prostovoljno posodabljajo in preverjajo nacionalni organi.
The aim of e-Certis is to facilitate the exchange of certificates and other documentary evidence frequently required by contracting authorities.
Cilj sistema e-Certis je olajšati izmenjavo potrdil in drugih listinskih dokazov, ki jih pogosto zahtevajo javni naročniki.
Experience acquired so far indicates that voluntary updating and verification is insufficient to ensure that e-Certis can deliver its full potential for simplifying and facilitating documentary exchanges for the benefit of SMEs in particular.
Pridobljene izkušnje kažejo, da prostovoljno posodabljanje in preverjanje ne zadostuje za razvoj vseh možnosti sistema e-Certis za poenostavitev in olajšanje izmenjave dokumentov, zlasti v korist MSP.
Maintenance should therefore be rendered obligatory in a first step.
Zato bi najprej moralo postati obvezno vzdrževanje.
Recourse to e-Certis will be made mandatory at a later stage.
Uporaba e-Certisa bo postala obvezna pozneje.
Contracting authorities should be able to require that environmental management measures or schemes be applied during the performance of a public contract.
Javni naročniki bi morali imeti možnost, da zahtevajo uporabo ukrepov ali sistemov za okoljsko ravnanje med izvajanjem javnega naročila.
Environmental management schemes, whether or not they are registered under Union instruments such as Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [15], can demonstrate that the economic operator has the technical capability to perform the contract.
S sistemi za okoljsko ravnanje se lahko, ne glede na to, ali so registrirani na podlagi instrumentov Unije, kot je Uredba (ES) št. 1221/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [15], ali ne, dokaže, da je gospodarski subjekt tehnično sposoben za izvedbo javnega naročila.
This includes Ecolabel certificates involving environmental management criteria.
Mednje spadajo certifikati znaka EU za okolje s kriteriji za okoljsko ravnanje.
Where an economic operator has no access to such environmental management registration schemes or no possibility of obtaining them within the relevant time limits, it should be allowed to submit a description of the environmental management measures implemented, provided that the economic operator concerned demonstrates that those measures ensure the same level of environmental protection as the measures required under the environmental management.
Če gospodarski subjekt nima dostopa do takih sistemov registriranja za okoljsko ravnanje ali nima možnosti za registracijo v predvidenih rokih, bi bilo treba dovoliti, da predloži opis ukrepov za okoljsko ravnanje, ki jih izvaja, pod pogojem, da zadevni gospodarski subjekt dokaže, da ti ukrepi zagotavljajo enako raven varstva okolja kot ukrepi, potrebni v okviru okoljskega ravnanja.
The notion of award criteria is central to this Directive.
Pojem meril za oddajo javnega naročila je bistven pojem te direktive.
It is therefore important that the relevant provisions be presented in as simple and streamlined a way as possible.
Zato je pomembno, da so zadevne določbe, kolikor je mogoče, enostavne in racionalizirane.
This can be obtained by using the terminology ‘most economically advantageous tender’ as the overriding concept, since all winning tenders should finally be chosen in accordance with what the individual contracting authority considers to be the economically best solution among those offered.
To je mogoče doseči z uporabo izraza „ekonomsko najugodnejša ponudba“ kot glavnega koncepta, saj bi bilo vse uspešne ponudnike navsezadnje treba izbrati glede na to, katera med ponujenimi rešitvami je po mnenju posameznega javnega naročnika najboljša z ekonomskega vidika.
In order to avoid confusion with the award criterion that is currently known as the ‘most economically advantageous tender’ in Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC, a different terminology should be used to cover that concept, the ‘best price-quality ratio’.
V izogib zamenjavi z merilom za oddajo javnega naročila, ki je v direktivah 2004/17/ES in 2004/18/ES poimenovano kot „ekonomsko najugodnejša ponudba“, bi morali za ta koncept uporabiti drug izraz, tj. „najboljše razmerje med ceno in kakovostjo“.
Consequently, it should be interpreted in accordance with the case-law relating to those Directives, except where there is a clearly materially different solution in this Directive.
Razlagati bi ga bilo torej treba v skladu z ustrezno sodno prakso glede navedenih direktiv, razen kadar je rešitev, ki je navedena v tej direktivi, očitno bistveno drugačna.
Contracts should be awarded on the basis of objective criteria that ensure compliance with the principles of transparency, non-discrimination and equal treatment, with a view to ensuring an objective comparison of the relative value of the tenders in order to determine, in conditions of effective competition, which tender is the most economically advantageous tender.
Javna naročila bi bilo treba oddati na podlagi objektivnih meril, ki zagotavljajo skladnost z načeli transparentnosti, nediskriminacije in enake obravnave, da bi tako zagotovili objektivno primerjavo relativne vrednosti ponudb, s čimer bi v razmerah učinkovite konkurence določili, katera ponudba je ekonomsko najugodnejša ponudba.
It should be set out explicitly that the most economically advantageous tender should be assessed on the basis of the best price-quality ratio, which should always include a price or cost element.
Izrecno bi bilo treba določiti, da bi morala biti ekonomska najugodnejša ponudba ocenjena glede na najboljše razmerje med ceno in kakovostjo, pri čemer bi moral biti vedno vključen vidik cene ali stroškov.
It should equally be clarified that such assessment of the most economically advantageous tender could also be carried out on the basis of either price or cost effectiveness only.
Prav tako bi bilo treba pojasniti, da bi tako oceno ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe lahko opravili tudi zgolj na podlagi cenovne ali stroškovne učinkovitosti.
It is furthermore appropriate to recall that contracting authorities are free to set adequate quality standards by using technical specifications or contract performance conditions.
Poleg tega je primerno opozoriti, da imajo javni naročniki možnost, da ustrezne standarde kakovosti določijo s tehničnimi specifikacijami ali pogoji za izvedbo javnega naročila.