natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission selected the sample on the basis of the sales and production volume of PSF during the investigation period and taking into account the geographical spread.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo pripombe glede začasnega vzorca.
This sample consisted of four Union producers.
Prejela ni nobenih pripomb.
The sampled Union producers accounted for 54 % of the total Union production of PSF.
Vzorec je reprezentativen za industrijo Unije.
The Commission invited interested parties to comment on the provisional sample.
Vzorčenje uvoznikov
No comments were received.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je nepovezane uvoznike pozvala, naj predložijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
The sample is representative of the Union industry.
Osem nepovezanih uvoznikov je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
Sampling of importers
Komisija je v skladu s členom 27(1) osnovne uredbe najprej izbrala vzorec treh nepovezanih uvoznikov na podlagi največjega obsega uvoza v Unijo.
To decide whether sampling is necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
V skladu s členom 27(2) osnovne uredbe so bila z vsemi znanimi zadevnimi uvozniki opravljena posvetovanja o izbiri vzorca.
Eight unrelated importers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
En vzorčen uvoznik se je izločil iz vzorca in Komisijo obvestil, da ne bo predložil izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
In accordance with Article 27(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission initially selected a sample of three unrelated importers on the basis of the largest volume of imports into the Union.
Komisija se je nato zaradi majhnega števila drugih (nevzorčenih) uvoznikov, ki jih je pozvala, naj predložijo izpolnjen vprašalnik, odločila, da vzorčenja ne bo izvedla.
In accordance with Article 27(2) of the basic Regulation, all known importers concerned were consulted on the selection of the sample.
Družbi, ki zadevni izdelek uvažata in uporabljata, sta navedli, da ne želita sodelovati kot uvoznika, ampak kot uporabnika.
One of the sampled importers withdrew from the sample, informing the Commission that it would not submit a questionnaire reply.
Komisija je od ostalih petih nepovezanih uvoznikov prejela štiri izpolnjene vprašalnike.
Subsequently, the Commission abandoned sampling in view of the limited remaining (non-sampled) importers, which were all requested to submit a questionnaire reply.
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov s Kitajskega
Two companies who import as well as use the product concerned indicated that they did not want to cooperate as importers but as users.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je vse znane proizvajalce izvoznike na Kitajskem pozvala, naj predložijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
From the remaining five unrelated importers, four questionnaire replies were received.
Poleg tega je Stalno misijo Kitajske pri Evropski uniji pozvala, naj opredeli morebitne druge proizvajalce izvoznike, ki bi bili zainteresirani za sodelovanje v preiskavi, in/ali stopi v stik z njimi.
Sampling of exporting producers in China
Na začetku je 23 proizvajalcev izvoznikov/skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known exporting producers in China to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Komisija je na podlagi informacij, ki jih je prejela od proizvajalcev izvoznikov/skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov in v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe najprej predlagala vzorec petih sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov/skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so v obdobju preiskave v Unijo izvažali v največjem obsegu.
In addition, the Commission asked the Mission of China to the European Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Zahtevane informacije sta pozneje predložila še dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika/dve skupini kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Initially 23 exporting producers/groups of exporting producers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Velikost teh dveh kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov/skupin kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov pa ni bila takšna, da bi bil vzorec drugačen, če bi zahtevane informacije predložili v roku.
On the basis of the information received from the exporting producers/groups of exporting producers and in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation the Commission initially proposed a sample of the five cooperating exporting producers/groups of exporting producers with the largest volume of exports to the Union during the investigation period.
Dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika/dve skupini kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov sta zahtevali, da bi bilo treba vzorec izbrati na podlagi surovin, uporabljenih za proizvodnjo rezanih poliestrskih vlaken.
Another two Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers submitted the requested information at a later stage.
Trdili sta, da bi bilo treba za vzorec izbrati enako število proizvajalcev rezanih poliestrskih vlaken, ki uporabljajo prečiščeno tereftalno kislino/monoetilen glikol („PTA/MEG“) in proizvajalcev rezanih poliestrskih vlaken, ki uporabljajo granulate polietilen tereftalata („granulati PET“).
However, the size of these two Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers was not at such as to change the sample, had they submitted the requested information within the deadline.
Nadalje sta trdili, da se proizvodni postopek razlikuje glede na uporabljeno surovino in da proizvajalci, ki uporabljajo ti dve različni surovini, ne konkurirajo na istem trgu.
Two Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers requested that the sample should be selected on the basis of the raw material used for the production of PSF.
Trdili sta tudi, da proizvajalci rezanih poliestrskih vlaken, ki kot surovino ne uporabljajo PTA/MEG, ne bi imeli koristi od zagotavljanja PTA/MEG za plačilo, ki je nižje od primernega, opisanega v pritožbi.
Thus they argued that the same number of PSF producers using purified terephthalic acid/mono ethylene glycol (‘PTA/MEG’) on the one hand and PSF producers using PET flakes on the other hand should be selected for the sample.
Komisija je izbrala vzorec na podlagi največjega obsega izvoza v Unijo v obdobju preiskave v skladu s členom 27(1) osnovne uredbe.
They argued further that the production processes were different depending on the raw material used and that producers using different raw materials do not compete in the same market.
Vzorec je upošteval tudi, da nekaterih shem morda ne uporabljajo vsi proizvajalci izvozniki na Kitajskem.
Moreover, it has been claimed that PSF producers that do not use PTA/MEG as raw materials would not benefit from the provision for PTA/MEG for less than adequate remuneration described in the complaint.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da so v vzorec vključene družbe, ki uporabljajo oba proizvodna postopka.
The Commission selected the sample based on the largest volume of exports to the Union during the investigation period in accordance with Article 27(1) of the basic Regulation.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik/skupina kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdila, da bi moral vzorec temeljiti na vrednosti in ne na obsegu izvoza ter zaprosil za vključitev v vzorec.
The sample did also take into account that some of the schemes might not be used by all exporting producers in China.
Če bi se vzorec izbral na podlagi vrednosti izvoza, to ne bi prineslo reprezentativnih in objektivnih rezultatov, saj bi lahko bile cene zaradi subvencioniranja izkrivljene.
In addition, it was considered that such a selection criteria would have been arbitrary as the consequent sample with an equal number of companies would not be representative in terms of export volume to the Union in line with Article 27(1) of the basic Regulation and therefore the request was rejected.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
One of the Chinese exporting producers/group of exporting producers claimed that the sample should be based on export value rather than export volume and asked to be included in the sample.
Ista stran je trdila, da je surovina, ki jo uporablja, v celoti iz recikliranih odpadkov iz tekstila in da ni prejemala nobenih subvencij, ki bi bile lahko povezane z uporabo PTA/MEG.
Selecting a sample based on export values would not lead to representative and objective results as prices may be distorted by subsidisation.
Navedena stran je trdila, da se ji ne bi smela pripisati nobena subvencijska stopnja, ki je bila izračunana na podlagi informacij v zvezi z družbami, ki so kot surovino uporabljale PTA/MEG.
The Commission had selected the five largest exporting producers/groups of exporting producers in terms of volume, representing 53 % of total export volumes to the Union by the cooperating Chinese exporters.
Kot je bilo pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 18, se je v vzorcu upoštevalo tudi to, da nekaterih shem morda ne uporabljajo vsi proizvajalci izvozniki na Kitajskem.
This is considered to be the largest representative volume of exports which can reasonably be investigated within the time available in accordance with Article 27(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zahteva je bila zato zavrnjena.
This claim was therefore rejected.
Začasni vzorec petih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, kot je bilo opisano v uvodni izjavi 16, je bil zato potrjen kot končni vzorec.
The same party argued that its raw material consisted entirely of recycled textile waste and it did not benefit from any subsidies which may be associated with the use of PTA/MEG.
Pritožnik je po razkritju izrazil pomisleke glede metodologije vzorčenja, ki jo je uporabila Komisija.
The party claimed that no subsidy margin should be attributed to it which was calculated based on information pertaining to companies which used PTA/MEG as their raw materials.
Izrazil je dvome o reprezentativnosti 23 sodelujočih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov/skupin kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz uvodne izjave 16 glede na skupno količino rezanih poliestrskih vlaken, ki so se s Kitajskega izvažala v Unijo.
As explained in recital 18 above the sample takes into account that some of the schemes may not be used by all exporting producers in China.
Poleg tega je menil, da vzorec petih podjetij glede na domnevno število 150 proizvajalcev rezanih poliestrskih vlaken na Kitajskem ne zadošča.
Therefore, the request was rejected.
Trdil je tudi, da se pri vzorčenju ni upoštevala zemljepisna porazdelitev kitajskih proizvajalcev in delež kitajskih proizvajalcev, ki uporabljajo različne zadevne proizvodne postopke.
The provisional sample of five exporting producers, as described in recital 16 was therefore confirmed as the final sample.
Pritožnik je nazadnje trdil, da Komisija ni razkrila dejanskega obsega rezanih poliestrskih vlaken, ki jih proizvajajo vzorčene kitajske družbe, in tega, ali je obseg proizvodnje reprezentativen glede na celotni obseg rezanih poliestrskih vlaken, proizvedenih na Kitajskem.
Following disclosure, the complainant questioned the sampling methodology applied by the Commission.
Uvoz 23 sodelujočih kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov/skupin kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je predstavljal 83 % skupnega obsega kitajskega uvoza, zato se je štelo, da je sodelovanje veliko.
It raised doubts about the representativeness of the 23 cooperating Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers mentioned in recital 16 above in relation to the total quantity of PSF exported from China to the Union.
Komisija je, kot je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 16, v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec petih proizvajalcev izvoznikov/skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so sodelovali v preiskavi in so v obdobju preiskave v Unijo izvažali v največjem obsegu.
In addition, it considered that a sample made of five companies was not sufficient in view of an alleged number of 150 producers of PSF in China.
Vzorec se je na tej podlagi štel za reprezentativnega.
Moreover, it claimed that the sampling has not taken into consideration the geographical spread of the Chinese producers and the proportion of Chinese producers using the various production processes involved.
Izbrane družbe so morale v celoti izpolniti vprašalnik.
Finally, the complainant argued that the Commission has not disclosed the actual volume of PSF produced by the sampled Chinese companies and whether the production volume is representative in relation to the total volume of PSF produced in China.
Proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki ne želijo sodelovati v preiskavi, v nobenem primeru ni mogoče izbrati v vzorec, saj si Komisija prizadeva, da bi do ugotovitev prišla na podlagi informacij iz izpolnjenih vprašalnikov sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki se preverijo na kraju samem.
The imports of the 23 cooperating Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers represented 83 % of the total Chinese import volume and cooperation was therefore considered high.
Pritožnik svoje trditve glede izbora vzorca proizvajalcev izvoznikov ob upoštevanju njihove zemljepisne porazdelitve na Kitajskem ni utemeljil.
As mentioned in recital 16 the Commission selected a sample of five exporting producers/groups of exporting producers that cooperated in the investigation with the largest volume of exports to the Union during the investigation period in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Pritožnik zlasti ni pojasnil, zakaj bi bil vzorec, ki temelji na merilu zemljepisne porazdelitve, v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe, ki zagotavlja možnost vzorčenja na podlagi največjega obsega izvoza.
On this basis the sample was considered representative.
Glede trditve, da v vzorcu ni bil upoštevan delež kitajskih proizvajalcev, ki uporabljajo različne zadevne proizvodne postopke, je treba poudariti, da so bile v vzorec, kot je bilo pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 18, vključene družbe, ki uporabljajo oba proizvodna postopka.
The selected companies were requested to fill in the full questionnaire.
Sicer pa največji kitajski izvozniki v proizvodnji rezanih poliestrskih vlaken za trg Unije uporabljajo PTA/MEG.
In any case, exporting producers not willing to cooperate in the investigation cannot be selected in the sample as the Commission seeks to establish findings based on the information collected from the cooperating exporting producers via their questionnaire responses, which are verified on spot.
Pritožnik se namesto na izvoz v Unijo sklicuje na proizvodnjo, zato je treba opozoriti, da Komisiji ni treba zagotoviti obsega rezanih poliestrskih vlaken, ki jih proizvajajo vzorčeni kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki/skupine kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, saj je namen tega postopka ocena subvencioniranja glede na obseg rezanih poliestrskih vlaken, ki se proizvajajo na Kitajskem in izvažajo v Unijo.
Regarding the selection of a sample of exporting producers taking into consideration their geographical spread in China, the complainant did not substantiate its claim.
Vse trditve pritožnika glede metode vzorčenja so bile zato zavrnjene.
In particular, the complainant did not explain why a sample based on the criterion of geographical spread would have been in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation, which does provide for the option to sample on the basis of largest volume of exports.
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Indije
As concerns the claim that the sample did not take into account the proportion of Chinese producers using the various production processes involved, it is highlighted that as explained in recital 18 above, the sample included companies using both production processes.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je vse znane proizvajalce izvoznike iz Indije pozvala, naj predložijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
In addition, the largest Chinese exporters are using PTA/MEG to produce PSF for the Union market.
Poleg tega je Stalno misijo Indije pri Evropski uniji pozvala, naj opredeli morebitne druge proizvajalce izvoznike, ki bi bili zainteresirani za sodelovanje v preiskavi, in/ali stopi v stik z njimi.
Furthermore, while the complainant refers to production rather than exports to the Union, it is noted that the Commission does not need to provide the volume of PSF produced by the sampled Chinese exporting producers/groups of exporting producers as the purpose of the current proceeding is the assessment of subsidisation in relation to the volume of PSF produced in China and exported to the Union.
Osem proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Indije je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
Therefore, all claims made by the complainant in relation to the sample methodology were rejected.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 27(1) osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec štirih podjetij na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega izvoza v Unijo, ki ga je bilo mogoče ustrezno preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
Sampling of exporting producers in India
V skladu s členom 27(2) osnovne uredbe so bila z vsemi znanimi zadevnimi proizvajalci izvozniki in indijskimi organi opravljena posvetovanja o izbiri vzorca.
To decide whether sampling is necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all known exporting producers in India to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Pripomb ni bilo.
In addition, the Commission asked the Mission of India to the European Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Pritožnik je po razkritju navedel, da je v Indiji 17 proizvajalcev rezanih poliestrskih vlaken in izrazil pomisleke glede tega, ali je vzorec štirih proizvajalcev izvoznikov reprezentativen.
Eight exporting producers in India provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Komisija potrjuje, da se je vzorec štirih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov štel za reprezentativnega, saj obsega približno 90 % celotnega indijskega izvoza v Unijo v obdobju preiskave.
In accordance with Article 27(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected a sample of four companies on the basis of the largest representative volume of exports to the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Vietnama
In accordance with Article 27(2) of the basic Regulation, all known exporting producers concerned, and the authorities of India, were consulted on the selection of the sample.
Komisija je vse znane proizvajalce izvoznike iz Vietnama pozvala, naj predložijo informacije iz obvestila o začetku.
No comments were made.
Poleg tega je Stalno misijo Vietnama pri Evropski uniji pozvala, naj opredeli morebitne druge proizvajalce izvoznike, ki bi bili zainteresirani za sodelovanje v preiskavi, in/ali stopi v stik z njimi.
Following disclosure, the complainant referred to the existence of 17 producers of PSF in India and put in question whether a sample of four exporting producers was representative.
Pet proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Vietnama je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec, vendar eno od podjetij v obdobju preiskave v Unijo ni izvažalo.
The Commission confirms that the sample of four Indian exporting producers was considered representative as it covers about 90 % of the total Indian exports to the Union in the investigation period.
Komisija se je zato odločila, da te družbe ne bo preiskala.
Sampling of exporting producers in Vietnam
Komisija se je zaradi majhnega števila drugih proizvajalcev izvoznikov odločila, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
The Commission asked all known exporting producers in Vietnam to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Pritožnik je po razkritju opozoril, da so izpolnjen vprašalnik predložili trije proizvajalci izvozniki iz Vietnama od štirih in da bi si morala Komisija prizadevati za enako pokritost kot pri kitajskem in indijskem izvozu.
In addition, the Commission asked the Mission of Vietnam to the European Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Komisija poudarja, da je položaj te industrije v Vietnamu precej drugačen, saj je sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zelo malo (tj. trije), proizvajalcev izvoznikov na Kitajskem in v Indiji pa je precej več.
Five exporting producers in Vietnam provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample, but one of these companies did not have any export sales to the Union during the investigation period.
Vzorčenje je bilo zato potrebno le v teh dveh državah.
Therefore, the Commission decided not to investigate this company.
Komisija je pojasnila tudi, da trije sodelujoči in preiskovani vietnamski proizvajalci izvozniki predstavljajo več kot 99 % celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Vietnama v Unijo.
In view of the low number of remaining exporting producers, the Commission decided that sampling was not necessary.
Individualna preiskava
Following disclosure, the complainant noted that for Vietnam questionnaire replies were received from three out of the four exporting producers and that the Commission should have sought to achieve the same coverage also for the Chinese and Indian exports.
Individualno preiskavo na podlagi člena 27(3) osnovne uredbe so zahtevali trije proizvajalci izvozniki/tri skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov s Kitajskega.
The Commission highlights that the industry situation was quite different in Vietnam given the very limited number of cooperating exporting producers (i.e. three) as opposed to the significant number of exporting producers in China and India.
Glede na število zahtev za individualno preiskavo in obseg vzorca proizvajalcev izvoznikov s Kitajskega bi bila preiskava teh zahtev preveliko breme.
Hence there was a need for sampling in these two latter countries only.
Te zahteve so bile zato zavrnjene.
The Commission also clarifies that the three cooperating and investigated Vietnamese exporting producers represent over 99 % of the total volume of imports of the product concerned from Vietnam into the Union.
En proizvajalec izvoznik iz Indije je zahteval individualno preiskavo na podlagi člena 27(3) osnovne uredbe.
Individual examination
Preiskava tega zahtevka je bila sprejeta.
Three exporting producers/groups of exporting producers in China requested individual examination under Article 27(3) of the basic Regulation.
Sprejeta je bila odločitev, da individualna preiskava v tem primeru ne bi bila preveliko breme in ne bi onemogočila pravočasnega zaključka preiskave.
Given the number of requests for individual examination and the size of the sample of exporting producers from China, the examination of these requests would have been unduly burdensome.
Odgovori na vprašalnik
These requests were therefore rejected.
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala predstavnikom Kitajske (vključno s posebnimi vprašalniki za banke ter proizvajalce PTA in MEG), predstavnikom Indije (vključno s posebnimi vprašalniki za banke) in predstavnikom Vietnama (vključno s posebnimi vprašalniki za banke ter proizvajalce PTA in MEG).
One exporting producer in India requested individual examination under Article 27(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala tudi petim vzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom s Kitajskega, petim proizvajalcem izvoznikom (štirim vzorčenim in enemu nevzorčenemu) iz Indije, štirim proizvajalcem izvoznikom iz Vietnama, štirim proizvajalcem Unije, petim nepovezanim uvoznikom in 105 uporabnikom.
The examination of this request was accepted.
Prejela je izpolnjene vprašalnike kitajske vlade (ministrstvo za trgovino) in petih vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov/skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov s Kitajskega.