natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, the revised Fisheries Act also provided for increased sanctions on IUU infringements, which could be considered as deterrent only for a part of the Sri Lankan long distance fleet (specifically, for the small scale boats which are fishing outside the Sri Lankan EEZ, for which sanctions might be considered appropriate in view of the limited fishing capacity of these vessels.
Opozoriti je treba, da je IOTC po sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012 izdala letna poročila o skladnosti za leti 2013 [8] in 2014 [9], iz katerih je razvidno, da Šrilanka za leti 2012 in 2013 še vedno ni izpolnila svojih obveznosti ali jih je izpolnila samo delno.
However, the Sri Lankan fleet of large scale vessels (above 24 meters in length) has increased in 2013 and 2014, and the level of sanctions foreseen by the new Fisheries Act which is applicable to this part of the fleet cannot be have considered as being deterrent, these vessels having a fishing capacity from 10 to 20 times larger than that of the smaller vessels.
V zvezi s poročilom o skladnosti za leto 2013 Šrilanka ni predložila nekaterih zahtevanih informacij o statističnih podatkih ter nekaterih ukrepih za ohranjanje in upravljanje.
Current legislation [6] foresees a maximum fine of EUR 8429 (LKR 1500000 [7]) which cannot be considered effective in securing compliance, to discourage violations and to deprive offenders of the benefits accruing from their illegal activities.
Zlasti v zvezi z Resolucijo 10/08 IOTC [10] o seznamu aktivnih plovil Šrilanka ni zagotovila informacij o mednarodnih radijskih klicnih znakih za vsa plovila.
The Commission therefore considers that the sanctioning system introduced by Sri Lanka is manifestly inadequate and is clearly not proportionate to the seriousness of possible infringements, to the potential impact of the infringements on the resources and to the potential benefit that could derive from such illegal actions.
Poleg tega tudi ni predložila obveznega poročila o napredku za sistem VMS.
Consequently, the actions undertaken by Sri Lanka in light of its duties as a flag State are insufficient to comply with the provisions of Articles 118 of the UNCLOS and Articles 18, 19 and 20 of the UNFSA.
V zvezi z Resolucijo 10/02 IOTC [12] o obveznih statističnih zahtevah Šrilanka ni sporočila podatkov o pogostosti velikosti za priobalni ribolov in podatkov o nominalnem ulovu, ulovu in ribolovnem naporu ter pogostosti velikosti v skladu s standardi, ki jih za priobalni ribolov, pelagični ribolov in ribolov s parangalom določa navedena resolucija.
In view of recitals 292 to 299 of the Decision of 15 November 2012 and the developments after 15 November 2012, the Commission takes the view, pursuant to Article 31(3) and 31(4)(a) of the IUU Regulation, that Sri Lanka has failed to discharge its duties under international law as a flag State in respect of IUU vessels and IUU fishing carried out or supported by fishing vessels flying its flag or by its nationals and has not taken sufficient action to counter documented and recurring IUU fishing by vessels previously flying its flag.
Šrilanka je le delno upoštevala Resolucijo 05/05 IOTC [13] o predložitvi podatkov o morskih psih, saj je sporočila združene podatke o ulovu z zabodno mrežo in parangalom.V zvezi z Resolucijo 12/05 IOTC [14] o pretovarjanju v pristanišču Šrilanka ni zagotovila obveznega poročila.V zvezi z Resolucijo 11/04 IOTC [15] o opazovalcih Šrilanka ni izvedla regionalnega opazovalnega programa, ki ga zahteva ta resolucija.
Failure to cooperate and to enforce (Article 31(5)(b), (c) and (d) of the IUU Regulation)
Zlasti ni uvedla opazovalnega programa in obveznega spremljanja 5 % števila plovil, daljših od 24 m, na morju ter ni upoštevala obveznosti poročanja opazovalcev.
As described in recitals 302 to 311 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, the Commission analysed whether Sri Lanka cooperated effectively with the Commission on investigations and associated activities.
V zvezi s poročilom o skladnosti za leto 2014 Šrilanka ni predložila nekaterih zahtevanih informacij o statističnih podatkih ter nekaterih ukrepih za ohranjanje in upravljanje.
Concerning the vessels referred to in recital 293 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, Sri Lanka was, as indicated in recital 296 of that Decision, obliged to report on a monthly basis on actions taken against those vessels.
Zlasti v zvezi z Resolucijo 13/02 IOTC [16] Šrilanka ni sprejela zakonodaje za uvedbo obveznega označevanja orodja.
That reporting only materialised for 9 out of 12 months in 2013 and 2 out of 4 months in 2014.
V zvezi z Resolucijo 13/08 IOTC [17] Šrilanka ni predložila načrta upravljanja za naprave za zbiranje rib (FAD), niti ni sprejela nobenih pravnih ali upravnih ukrepov v zvezi z osmimi plovili z zapornimi plavaricami v skladu z zahtevami resolucije 12/13 IOTC [18].
In contravention with the provisions of Article 20 of the UNFSA which sets out obligations of States to investigate, cooperate either directly or through RFMO's to ensure compliance with and enforcement of RFMO conservation and management measures, Sri Lanka has therefore failed to fulfil its obligations under international law with respect to international cooperation and enforcement.
V zvezi z Resolucijo 06/03 IOTC [19] Šrilanka tudi leta 2014 ni opremila svojih plovil s skupno dolžino več kot 15 metrov s sistemom VMS ali vzpostavila FMC ter ni predložila obveznega poročila o napredku na področju sistema VMS.V zvezi z Resolucijo 10/02 IOTC o obveznih statističnih zahtevah ni sporočila podatkov o nominalnem ulovu, ulovu in ribolovnem naporu ter pogostosti velikosti v skladu s standardi iz te resolucije.V zvezi z resolucijama IOTC 13/06 [20] in 12/04 [21] Šrilanka ni prenesla prepovedi v zvezi z oceanskimi beloplavutimi morskimi psi ali uvedla zahtev, v skladu s katerimi morajo biti plovila z zapornimi plavaricami opremljena z mrežami z dolgimi ročaji, parangalke pa s pripravami za rezanje mreže in snemanje trnkov.
As described in recital 302 of the Decision of 15 November 2012 as well as recital 45 above, Sri Lanka did not fulfil its monthly reporting obligations towards the IOTC for the 13 Sri Lankan vessels presumed to be involved in IUU activities but not listed by the IOTC.
V zvezi z Resolucijo 11/04 [22] Šrilanka tudi leta 2014 ni izvedla opazovalnega programa v skladu z zahtevami.Zlasti ni uvedla opazovalnega programa in obveznega spremljanja 5 % števila plovil, daljših od 24 m, na morju in ni upoštevala obveznosti poročanja opazovalcev.
Thus, Sri Lanka failed to demonstrate that it fulfils the conditions of Article 94(2)(b) of the UNCLOS which stipulates that a flag State assumes jurisdiction under its internal law over each ship flying its flag and its master, officers and crew.
V zvezi z Resolucijo 10/10 IOTC [23] Šrilanka ni zagotovila poročila o uvozu, iztovarjanju in pretovarjanju ribjih izdelkov iz tuna in tunu podobnih vrst v pristaniščih.
Additionally, as described in recitals 306 to 307 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, the Commission analysed whether Sri Lanka took effective enforcement measures in respect to operators responsible for IUU fishing and whether sanctions of sufficient severity to deprive the offenders of the benefits accruing from IUU fishing were applied.
Šrilanka IOTC ni zagotovila zahtevanih informacij in izpolnila obveznosti IOTC iz uvodnih izjav 56 in 58, kar kaže, da ne izpolnjuje svojih obveznosti kot država zastave, določenih v UNCLOS in UNFSA.
As explained in recital 41, following the adoption of the Decision of 15 November 2012, Sri Lanka did not put in place a deterrent sanctioning system for the segment of large vessels in its fleet.
Zlasti dejstvo, da ni zagotovila pravočasnih informacij o statističnih podatkih, sistemu VMS, ulovu in naporu, pretovarjanju v pristaniščih in opazovalnem programu, zmanjšuje njeno zmožnost izpolnjevanja obveznosti v skladu s členoma 117 in 118 UNCLOS.
The current catalogue of sanctions is not in line with Article 19(2) of the UNFSA which stipulates, inter alia, that sanctions should be adequate in severity and deprive offenders of the benefits accruing from their illegal activities.
V skladu z navedenima členoma morajo države za svoje državljane sprejeti ukrepe za ohranjanje živih virov na odprtem morju ter sodelovati pri ukrepih za ohranjanje in upravljanje živih virov na območjih odprtega morja.
Available evidence still confirms that Sri Lanka has not fulfilled its obligations under international law with respect to effective enforcement measures.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 322 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012, so bili med obiskom Komisije v Šrilanki novembra 2010 ugotovljeni številni elementi, zlasti v zvezi z odsotnostjo sistema VMS in zakonodaje glede poročanja o ulovu.
In this respect, as explained in recitals 36 to 38 the continued existence of vessels fishing in breach of conservation and management measures of the IOTC highlights Sri Lanka's failure to honour its responsibilities vis-à-vis its vessels operating on the high seas as set out in Article 18(1) and (2) of the UNFSA.
Drugi elementi, na katere se nanašajo pomisleki, kot sta pomanjkanje opazovalnega programa in slabo poročanje o plovilih in državljanih, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so udeleženi v nezakonitem, neprijavljenem in nereguliranem ribolovu, so bili opredeljeni na podlagi poročil IOTC o skladnosti za leti 2011 in 2012 ter navedeni v uvodnih izjavah 319 in 321 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012.V zvezi s tem so informacije, ki so jih organi Šrilanke predložili v zvezi z zakonodajo o ribolovu na odprtem morju, vzpostavitvijo delujočega sistema VMS, zanesljivim opazovalnim programom ter evidentiranjem ulova in poročanjem o njem, pokazale, da organi niso zagotovili uspešnega in učinkovitega nadzora in spremljanja plovil, ki plujejo pod zastavo Šrilanke, v skladu z mednarodnimi obveznostmi.
As highlighted in recital 309 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, the level of development of Sri Lanka cannot be considered as a factor undermining the capacity of the competent authorities to cooperate with other countries and pursue enforcement actions.
Kar zadeva regionalni opazovalni program, so dokumenti, ki so jih zagotovili organi Šrilanke, pokazali, da kljub izbiri in imenovanju nekaj inšpektorjev, inšpekcijski nadzor ne bo zajel velikega dela ladjevja zaradi sorazmerno malega števila inšpektorjev (45) v primerjavi s številom plovil (1758 v evidenci plovil, ki jo vodi IOTC).
The evaluation of the specific constraints on the development is further described in recitals 65 to 67.
Šrilanka kljub temu ni predložila nobenega predloga za obravnavo te resne težave v okviru IOTC, kar pomeni, da zaradi neustreznih sredstev inšpekcijskega nadzora sedanja obravnava ladjevja pod šrilanško zastavo, ki opravlja dejavnosti na odprtem morju, ni ustrezna.V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da ima Šrilanka resne težave pri sporočanju podatkov IOTC, kar zmanjšuje njeno zmožnost izpolnjevanja obveznosti kot država zastave.
Consequently, the actions taken by Sri Lanka in light of its duties as flag State are insufficient to comply with Articles 94(2)(b) of the UNCLOS and Article 18 and 19 of the UNFSA.
Komisija glede sistema VMS navaja različne težave, ki jih je izpostavila IOTC, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 316, 321 in 322 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012 ter uvodni izjavi 60 tega sklepa.
In view of recitals 302 to 311 of the Decision of 15 November 2012 and the developments after 15 November 2012, the Commission takes the view, pursuant to Article 31(3) and 31(5)(b), (c) and (d) of the IUU Regulation, that Sri Lanka has failed to discharge the duties incumbent upon it under international law as flag State in respect of cooperation and enforcement efforts.
Šrilanka je po sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012 navedla, da postopek uvedbe sistema VMS poteka.
Failure to implement international rules (Article 31(6) of the IUU Regulation)
Komisiji je predložila zakonodajo, iz katere je razvidno, da od 1. novembra 2011 velja zahteva za namestitev radijskega odzivnika na krovu, in navedla, da je ponudnik storitev že bil izbran.
As described in recitals 314 to 334 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, the Commission analysed any information deemed relevant with respect to Sri Lanka's status as Contracting Party to the IOTC.
Vendar finančna sredstva še niso bila zagotovljena, pogajanja med organi Šrilanke in zadevnimi finančnimi institucijami pa trajajo že več kot 18 mesecev.
The Commission has therefore analysed any information deemed relevant with respect to Sri Lanka's agreement to apply conservation and management measures adopted by the IOTC following the Decision of 15 November 2012.
Pogajanja zadevajo pogoje posojila za nakup in postavitev FMC ter zagotovitev finančne pomoči izvajalcem dejavnosti, da bi lahko v razumnem času namestili in izvedli sistem VMS za celotno ladjevje za odprto morje.
It is recalled that since the Decision of 15 November 2012, the IOTC issued annual Compliance Reports for respectively 2013 [8] and 2014 [9], which show that Sri Lanka is still not compliant or only partially compliant in the years 2012 and 2013.
Zato Šrilanka nima FMC.
With respect to the Compliance Report for 2013, Sri Lanka failed to submit some of the information required on statistics and on some conservation and management measures.
Poleg tega sistem VMS še ne deluje, saj je šele v fazi razvoja.
In particular, as regards the IOTC Resolution 10/08 [10] for the list of active vessels, Sri Lanka did not provide information on the international radio call sign for each vessel.
Komisija je med obiskom januarja 2014 ugotovila, da šrilanška ribiška plovila še vedno niso opremljena s sistemom VMS, kar je Šrilanka potrdila v poznejših dopisih, IOTC pa v poročilih o skladnosti za leti 2013 in 2014.
As regards the IOTC Resolution 06/03 [11] on the adoption of a vessel monitoring systems (VMS), Sri Lanka failed to equip its vessels above 15 meters in overall length with VMS and to construct a Fisheries Monitoring Centre (FMC).
Kar zadeva skladnost z zahtevami IOTC v zvezi s sistemom VMS, obstajajo razlike med poročili IOTC o skladnosti za leti 2013 in 2014 ter ukrepi Šrilanke.
Nor has Sri Lanka submitted the mandatory VMS progress report.
V poročilih o skladnosti je navedeno, da je Šrilanka delno upoštevala zahteve, vendar informacije, ki jih je zagotovila Šrilanka, jasno kažejo, da dejanske izvedbe sistema VMS ni bilo.
Regarding the IOTC Resolution 10/02 [12] on the mandatory statistical requirements, Sri Lanka has not reported the size frequency data for coastal fisheries and has not reported nominal catch, catch and effort data and size frequency at the standard required by that Resolution for the coastal fisheries, surface fisheries and longline fishery.
Šrilanka zato na podlagi informacij, zbranih o zmožnosti svojih organov na področju spremljanja, nadzora in obvladovanja, zlasti glede operativnih zmogljivosti za upravljanje svojega ladjevja ter razvoja in izvedbe delujočega sistema VMS, ne izpolnjuje pogojev iz člena 18(3)(g) UNFSA.
As regards the IOTC Resolution 05/05 [13] on the submission of data regarding sharks, Sri Lanka is only partly compliant, as catch data for gillnet and longline are reported combined.As regards the IOTC Resolution 12/05 [14] on transhipments in port, Sri Lanka has not provided the mandatory report.As regards the IOTC Resolution 11/04 on the observers [15], Sri Lanka has not implemented the regional observer scheme as required by this Resolution.
Dejstva iz oddelka 3.3 kažejo, da Šrilanka krši člen 18(3) UNFSA.
In particular, Sri Lanka has not established the observer scheme for the mandatory 5 % at sea for the vessels longer than 24 m and is not in compliance with the observer reporting obligation.
Zato Šrilanka glede na svoje dolžnosti kot država zastave ne izpolnjuje določb iz členov 117 in 118 UNCLOS ter člena 18(3) UNFSA.
With respect to the Compliance Report for 2014, Sri Lanka did not submit some required information on statistics, nor on some conservation and management measures.
Komisija v skladu s členom 31(3) in (6) uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova ter glede na uvodne izjave 314 do 334 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012 in razvoj dogodkov po tem datumu meni, da Šrilanka ni izpolnila svojih dolžnosti v zvezi z mednarodnimi pravili, predpisi ter ukrepi za ohranjanje in upravljanje, ki so ji bile naložene z mednarodnim pravom.
In particular, as regards the IOTC Resolution 13/02 [16], Sri Lanka has not adopted legislation making gear marking mandatory.
Posebne omejitve držav v razvoju
Regarding IOTC Resolution 13/08 [17], Sri Lanka has not submitted a Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) management plan, nor have any legal and administrative measures been taken for the 8 purse seiners as required under IOTC Resolution 12/13 [18].
Opozoriti je treba, da se Šrilanka v skladu z indeksom človekovega razvoja Združenih narodov [24] šteje za državo s srednjo stopnjo človekovega razvoja (92. mesto od 186 držav).
Also repeated in 2014, as regards the Resolution 11/04 [22], Sri Lanka has not implemented the observer scheme as required.In particular, Sri Lanka has not established the observer scheme for the mandatory 5 % at sea for the vessels longer than 24 meters and is not in compliance with the observer reporting obligation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 337 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012 ni bilo mogoče najti nobenih dokazov, ki bi potrdili, da je razlog za neizpolnjevanje dolžnosti, ki so bile Šrilanki naložene z mednarodnim pravom, nezadosten razvoj.
Regarding IOTC Resolution 10/10 [23], Sri Lanka has not provided the report on import, landing, transhipment of tuna and tuna-like fish products in ports.
Po 15. novembru 2012 niso bili predloženi dodatni dokazi, ki bi razkrivali, da so ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti posledica pomanjkanja zmogljivosti in upravne infrastrukture.
Sri Lanka's failure to provide the IOTC with the required information and to fulfil the IOTC obligations as referred to in recitals 56 and 58 demonstrates its failure to fulfil its obligations as flag State laid down in the UNCLOS and the UNFSA.
Komisija v skladu s členom 31(7) uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova ter glede na uvodni izjavi 336 in 337 sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012 in razvoj dogodkov po tem datumu meni, da stopnja razvoja Šrilanke ne vpliva negativno na njen razvojni status in splošno ravnanje na področju ribolova.
In particular, the failure to provide timely information on statistics, VMS, catch and effort, transhipment in port, observer programme undermines Sri Lanka's ability to fulfil its obligations under Articles 117 and 118 of the UNCLOS.
SKLEPNA UGOTOVITEV O OPREDELITVI NESODELUJOČE TRETJE DRŽAVE
Those articles stipulate a State's duties to adopt measures for their nationals for the conservation of living resources of the high seas and to cooperate on conservation and management measures for living resources in the areas of the high seas.
Šrilanko je treba na podlagi navedenih ugotovitev v zvezi z njenim neizpolnjevanjem dolžnosti, ki so ji z mednarodnim pravom naložene kot državi zastave, pristanišča, obalni državi ali državi trga, ter nesprejetjem ukrepov za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje v skladu s členom 31 uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova opredeliti kot državo, ki jo Komisija obravnava kot nesodelujočo tretjo državo pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu.
As described in recital 322 of the Decision of 15 November 2012, a number of elements were revealed during the Commission's visit to Sri Lanka in November 2010, in particular regarding the lack of VMS and the lack of legislation for catch reporting.
Pristojni organi držav članic ob upoštevanju člena 18(1)(g) uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova zavrnejo uvoz ribiških proizvodov v Unijo, ne da bi jim bilo treba zahtevati kakršne koli dodatne dokaze ali pošiljati prošnjo za pomoč državi zastave, ko ugotovijo, da so potrdilo o ulovu potrdili organi države zastave, ki je opredeljena kot nesodelujoča država v skladu s členom 31 navedene uredbe.
Other elements of concern, such as lack of observer scheme and the poor reporting on vessels and nationals identified as involved in IUU fishing were highlighted in recitals 319 and 321 of the Decision of 15 November 2012 as a result of the IOTC Compliance Reports for 2011 and 2012.In that regard, the information submitted by the Sri Lankan authorities in relation to the high seas fishing legislation, creation of a functional VMS, a reliable observer scheme and catch registration and reporting revealed that the authorities have not ensured effective and efficient control and monitoring of the Sri Lankan flagged vessels in line with international obligations.
Negativni učinek na trgovino bi bilo treba, kolikor je mogoče, postopoma uvesti, da se deležnikom in gospodarskim subjektom zagotovi dovolj časa od začetka veljavnosti tega izvedbenega sklepa Komisije do morebitnih ukrepov Sveta, da se ob upoštevanju posebnih značilnosti ribiških proizvodov iz Šrilanke in šrilanških podjetij za dobavo, zlasti dejstva, da so to mala in srednje velika podjetja, prilagodijo na nove razmere.
In particular as indicated in recitals 36, 40 and 41, Sri Lanka was invited to develop a thorough legal framework for allowing fishing in high seas accompanied by high seas fishing licences and the fulfilment of the IOTC resolutions, in particular with respect to monitoring, control and surveillance of its own fleet, including a VMS, logbook and catch reporting system and an observer scheme.With regards to the high seas fishing legislation, the Fisheries Act was amended to allow for fishing in the high seas and the implementing regulation for issuance licence was drafted and finally adopted in September 2014.
Zato bi bilo treba izvajanje tega sklepa odložiti za tri mesece.
However, as the implementing regulation was only adopted in September 2014 and no information exists on how it would be implemented, only administrative licences are being issued while Sri Lankan vessels operate with no VMS.
Odlog izvajanja ne bi smel vplivati na potrebo po hitrem ukrepanju Sveta za pospešeno obravnavo razmer v zvezi z nezakonitim, neprijavljenim in nereguliranim ribolovom v Šrilanki.
As for the regional observer scheme, the documents provided by Sri Lankan authorities revealed that despite the selection and recruitment of some inspectors, a large part of the fleet will not be covered due to the small number of inspectors (45) compared to the large number of the vessels (1758 in IOTC register of vessels).
Navesti bi bilo treba, da opredelitev Šrilanke kot države, ki jo Komisija za namene tega sklepa obravnava kot nesodelujočo državo, ne izključuje poznejših ukrepov, ki jih lahko Komisija ali Svet sprejme za pripravo seznama nesodelujočih držav.
Sri Lanka has nevertheless not made any proposals to address this serious problem in the context of the IOTC which means that there is no proper coverage of the Sri Lankan flagged fleet operating in the high seas because of inadequate means of inspection.In that respect, it is also recalled that Sri Lanka has serious problems in reporting data to the IOTC which undermines the country's capacity to exercise its obligations as flag State.
Če Svet uvrsti Šrilanko na seznam nesodelujočih tretjih držav v skladu z določbami člena 33 uredbe o preprečevanju nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, ta predhodni sklep o opredelitvi zastara.
In relation to the VMS, as described in recitals 316, 321 and 322 of the Decision of 15 November 2012 and recital 60 of this Decision, the Commission recalls various problems highlighted by the IOTC.
POSTOPEK ODBORA
Following the Decision of 15 November 2012, Sri Lanka stated that it was in the process of introducing VMS.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za ribištvo in ribogojstvo –
It submitted to the Commission the legislation demonstrating the requirement of a transponder on board as of 1 November 2011 and indicated that a service provider had already been selected.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP: