natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having analysed the above comments, it is confirmed that the annulment of the contested Regulation with regard to Novatex, insofar as the definitive countervailing duty exceeded the duty applicable in the absence of the error identified by the Court, should not imply the annulment of the entire procedure prior to the adoption of that Regulation.
Po analizi zgornjih pripomb se potrdi, da razveljavitev izpodbijane uredbe v zvezi z družbo Novatex ne bi smela pomeniti, da je ničen celoten postopek, ki je potekal pred sprejetjem navedene uredbe, saj je bila dokončna izravnalna dajatev višja od dajatve, ki bi se uporabila, če ne bi prišlo do napake, ki jo je navedlo Sodišče.
The recalculation of Novatex’s subsidy duty rate, taking account of the revised line 74 of the company’s tax return, indeed results in a corrected amount of EUR 35,39 per tonne.
Ponovni izračun stopnje izravnalne dajatve za družbo Novatex, ob upoštevanju spremembe v vrstici 74 napovedi družbe za odmero davka, dejansko pomeni popravljeni znesek v višini 35,39 EUR/tono.
The revised duty rate should indeed be applied retroactively, i.e. from the date of entry into force of the contested Regulation.
Spremenjeno stopnjo dajatve bi bilo treba uporabljati za nazaj, in sicer od datuma začetka veljavnosti izpodbijane uredbe
Account has been taken of the comments made, and having analysed them it is concluded that the implementation of the General Court judgment should take the form of a revision of the countervailing duty rate applicable to Novatex, which should be reduced from EUR 44,02 per tonne to EUR 35,39 per tonne.
Ob upoštevanju pripomb in njihovi analizi se zato sklene, da bi izvrševanje sodbe Splošnega sodišča moralo biti v obliki spremenjene stopnje izravnalne dajatve, ki se uporablja za družbo Novatex, ki bi jo bilo treba zmanjšati s 44,02 EUR/tono na 35,39 EUR/tono.
As Novatex was the sole exporting producer of the product concerned in Pakistan during the investigation period, this revised duty rate applies to all imports from Pakistan.
Ker je bila družba Novatex edini proizvajalec izvoznik zadevnega izdelka v Pakistanu v obdobju preiskave, se ta spremenjena stopnja dajatve uporablja za celoten uvoz iz Pakistana.
The revised duty rate should be applied retroactively, i.e. from the date of entry into force of the contested Regulation.
Spremenjeno stopnjo dajatve bi bilo treba uporabljati za nazaj, in sicer od datuma začetka veljavnosti izpodbijane uredbe.
However, as provided for by Article 2 of that Regulation, the amounts secured by way of provisional countervailing duty pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 473/2010 [6] on imports from Pakistan can only be definitively collected at the rate of the definitive countervailing duty of EUR 35,39 per tonne, imposed pursuant to the present amendment to Article 1 of the contested Regulation.
Vendar pa se v skladu s členom 2 navedene uredbe zneske, ki se zagotovijo z začasno izravnalno dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 473/2010 [6] o uvozu iz Pakistana, lahko dokončno poberejo po stopnji dokončne izravnalne dajatve po stopnji 35,39 EUR/tono, uvedene v skladu s spremembo člena 1 izpodbijane uredbe.
The amounts secured in excess of the rate of the definitive countervailing duty should be released.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo stopnjo dokončne izravnalne dajatve, bi se morali sprostiti.
In addition, for the sake of transparency, it should be pointed out that Regulation (EU) No 473/2010 entered into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, namely on 2 June 2010 (and not on 1 June 2010, as stated by Novatex).
Zaradi transparentnosti, bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je Uredba (EU) št. 473/2010 začela veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, in sicer 2. junija 2010 (in ne 1. junija 2010, kot je navedla družba Novatex).
Customs authorities should be instructed to proceed with the reimbursement of the amount of duties paid in excess of the amount of EUR 35,39 per tonne for the imports concerned, in compliance with the applicable customs legislation.
Carinski organi bi morali dobiti navodila, da nadaljujejo postopek povračila zneska plačanih dajatev, ki presegajo znesek 35,39 EUR/tono za zadevni uvoz v skladu z veljavno carinsko zakonodajo.
All interested parties were given an opportunity to comment within the 10-day period prescribed in Article 30(5) of the basic Regulation.
Vse zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da predložijo pripombe v 10-dnevnem roku iz člena 30(5) osnovne uredbe.
No comments of substance were received.
Nobene materialne pripombe niso bile prejete.
D. AMENDMENT OF THE MEASURES
D. SPREMEMBA UKREPOV
In light of the results of the partial reopening, it is considered appropriate to amend the countervailing duty applicable to imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, originating in Pakistan to EUR 35,39 per tonne.
Glede na rezultate delne obnove preiskave se zdi primerno spremeniti stopnjo izravnalne dajatve, ki se uporablja za uvoz nekaterega polietilen tereftalata z viskoznostjo 78 ml/g ali več v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5, zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Pakistana, na 35,39 EUR/tono.
This procedure does not affect the date on which the measures imposed by the contested Regulation will expire, namely 30 September 2015,
Ta postopek ne vpliva na datum prenehanja veljavnosti ukrepov, ki so bili uvedeni z izpodbijano uredbo, tj. 30. september 2015 –
The table in Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 857/2010 is replaced by the following:
Preglednica iz člena 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 857/2010 se nadomesti z naslednjo:
Definitive countervailing duty rate
Dokončna stopnja izravnalne dajatve
The revised duty rate of EUR 35,39 per tonne for Pakistan shall be applicable as from 30 September 2010.
Revidirana stopnja dajatve v višini 35,39 EUR/tono za Pakistan se uporablja od 30. septembra 2010.
The amounts of duties paid or entered into the accounts pursuant to Article 1 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 857/2010 in its initial version and the amounts of provisional duties definitively collected pursuant to Article 2 of the same Regulation in its initial version, which exceed those as established on the basis of Article 1 of this Regulation, shall be repaid or remitted.
Zneski dajatev, ki so bili plačani ali vknjiženi v skladu s členom 1 Izvedbene Uredbe (EU) št. 857/2010 v prvotni različici, in zneski dokončno pobranih začasnih dajatev v skladu s členom 2 iste uredbe v prvotni različici, ki presegajo tiste, ki jih določa člen 1 te uredbe, se povrnejo ali odpustijo.
Repayment and remission shall be requested from national customs authorities in accordance with the applicable customs legislation.
Povrnitev in odpustitev se zahtevata pri nacionalnih carinskih organih v skladu z veljavno carinsko zakonodajo.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 857/2010 of 27 September 2010 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates (OJ L 254, 29.9.2010, p. 10).
Izvedbena Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 857/2010 z dne 27. septembra 2010 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Irana, Pakistana in Združenih arabskih emiratov (UL L 254, 29.9.2010, str. 10).
Case T-556/10 Novatex Ltd v Council of the European Union.
Zadeva T-556/10, Novatex Ltd proti Svetu Evropske unije.
Case T-2/95 Industrie des poudres sphériques (IPS) v Council [1998] ECR II-3939.
Zadeva T-2/95, Industrie des poudres sphériques (IPS) proti Svetu, Recueil 1998, str. II-3939.
OJ C 138, 17.5.2013, p. 32–34.
UL C 138, 17.5.2013, str. 32–34.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 473/2010 of 31 May 2010 imposing a provisional countervailing duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates (OJ L 134, 1.6.2010, p. 25-58).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 473/2010 z dne 31. maja 2010 o uvedbi začasne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Irana, Pakistana in Združenih arabskih emiratov (UL L 134, 1.6.2010, str. 25-58).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 918/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 918/2013
establishing a prohibition of fishing for haddock in EU and international waters of Vb and VIa by vessels flying the flag of Spain
o prepovedi ribolova na vahnjo v vodah EU ter mednarodnih vodah območij Vb in VIa s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Španije
EU and international waters of Vb and VIa
vode EU ter mednarodne vode območij Vb in VIa
Commission Regulation (EU) No 919/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 919/2013
establishing a prohibition of fishing for greater forkbeard in EU and international waters of VIII and IX by vessels flying the flag of Spain
o prepovedi ribolova na tabinjo belico v vodah EU ter mednarodnih vodah območij VIII in IX s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Španije
Greater Forkbeard (Phycis blennoides)
tabinja belica (Phycis blennoides)
EU and international waters of VIII and IX
vode EU ter mednarodne vode območij VIII in IX
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 920/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 920/2013
on the designation and the supervision of notified bodies under Council Directive 90/385/EEC on active implantable medical devices and Council Directive 93/42/EEC on medical devices
o imenovanju in nadzoru priglašenih organov iz Direktive Sveta 90/385/EGS o aktivnih medicinskih pripomočkih za vsaditev in Direktive Sveta 93/42/EGS o medicinskih pripomočkih
Having regard to Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices [1], and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 90/385/EGS z dne 20. junija 1990 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o aktivnih medicinskih pripomočkih za vsaditev [1] in zlasti člena 11(2) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices [2], and in particular Article 16(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 93/42/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993 o medicinskih pripomočkih [2] in zlasti člena 16(2) Direktive,
Technical progress has led to more complex devices and production methods implying new conformity assessment challenges for notified bodies.
Tehnični napredek je privedel do razvoja zapletenejših pripomočkov in zahtevnejših proizvodnih metod, kar za priglašene organe pomeni nove izzive pri ugotavljanju skladnosti.
Those developments have resulted in variations in the level of competence of notified bodies and in different degrees of stringency applied by them.
Tak potek razvoja je povzročil odstopanja v zvezi z ravnjo kompetence priglašenih organov in različnimi stopnjami strogosti, ki jih slednji uporabljajo.
Accordingly, to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market, it is necessary to determine a common interpretation of the main elements of the criteria for designation of notified bodies set out in Directive 90/385/EEC and Directive 93/42/EEC.
Zato je za zagotovitev nemotenega delovanja notranjega trga treba določiti enotno razlago glavnih elementov meril za imenovanje priglašenih organov, navedenih v direktivah 90/385/EGS in 93/42/EGS.
The common interpretation of the criteria for designation provided by this Regulation does not suffice to assure their consistent application.
Enotna razlaga meril za imenovanje v tej uredbi ne zadošča za zagotovitev njihove dosledne uporabe.
Furthermore, many ad hoc questions arise in the day-to-day designation practice, in relation with new technologies and products.
Poleg tega se v povezavi z novimi tehnologijami in proizvodi pri praksi imenovanja iz dneva v dan pojavljajo številna ad hoc vprašanja.
For these reasons, it is necessary to provide for procedural obligations which ensure a constant dialogue between Member States on their general practices and on ad hoc questions.
Zato je treba uvesti postopkovne obveznosti, ki zagotavljajo stalen dialog med državami članicami o njihovih splošnih praksah in ad hoc vprašanjih.
This will bring to the surface discrepancies in the methods used to assess the conformity assessment bodies and in the interpretation of the criteria for their designation set out in Directive 90/385/EEC and Directive 93/42/EEC.
Pri tem se bodo pokazale razlike v metodah, ki se uporabljajo za ocenjevanje organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti, in pri razlagi meril za njihovo imenovanje, navedenih v direktivah 90/385/EGS in 93/42/EGS.
Bringing the discrepancies to the surface will permit to develop a common interpretation of the assessment methods, especially with regard to new technologies and devices.
Razkritje razlik bo omogočilo razvoj enotne razlage metod ocenjevanja, zlasti v zvezi z novimi tehnologijami in pripomočki.
To ensure a common approach from the designating authorities and neutral conditions for competition those authorities should base their decisions on a common set of documents which lay the ground for the verification of the criteria for designation set out in Directive 90/385/EEC and Directive 93/42/EEC.
Za zagotovitev enakega pristopa organov za imenovanje in nevtralnih pogojev v zvezi s konkurenco bi morali ti organi svoje odločitve sprejemati na podlagi enotnega sklopa dokumentov, ki so podlaga za preverjanje meril za imenovanje, navedenih v direktivah 90/385/EGS in 93/42/EGS.
To facilitate, in a view of the increasingly complex work of conformity assessment bodies, a common application of the criteria established for their designation, those bodies should be assessed by teams of assessors representing the knowledge and experience of different Member States and of the Commission.
Ob upoštevanju vse zahtevnejšega dela organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti bi za pospeševanje enotne uporabe meril, ki so bila uvedena v zvezi z njihovim imenovanjem, morale navedene organe oceniti skupine ocenjevalcev, ki predstavljajo znanje in izkušnje različnih držav članic in Komisije.
To facilitate such assessments, certain essential documents should be accessible to those involved in these activities.
Za lažje ocenjevanje bi morali biti sodelujočim pri teh dejavnostih dostopni nekateri bistveni dokumenti.
Designating authorities from Member States other than the Member State where the conformity assessment body is established should have the possibility to review the documentation related to the assessment and to comment on intended designations if they so wish.
Organi za imenovanje, ki niso iz držav članic, kjer ima organ za ugotavljanje skladnosti svoj sedež, bi morali imeti možnost, da pregledajo dokumentacijo v zvezi z ocenjevanjem ter podajo pripombe o načrtovanih imenovanjih, če tako želijo.
The access to those documents is necessary in order to allow the identification of weaknesses of the applicant conformity assessment bodies as well as discrepancies in the Member States’ assessment methods and in their interpretation of the criteria for designation set out in Directive 90/385/EEC and Directive 93/42/EEC.
Dostop do teh dokumentov je potreben za ugotavljanje pomanjkljivosti organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti, ki so predložili vloge, ter razlik pri metodah ocenjevanja, ki jih uporabljajo države članice, in njihovi razlagi meril za imenovanje, navedenih v direktivah 90/385/EGS in 93/42/EGS.
In order to ensure that the common interpretation of the criteria established applies similarly to scope extensions, which often reflect new technologies or product types and renewal of designations of notified bodies, the procedure for the designation of conformity assessment bodies should also be followed in those situations.
Za zagotovitev, da se enotna razlaga uvedenih meril podobno uporablja tudi za razširjena področja, na katerih so pogoste nove tehnologije ali vrste proizvodov, in obnovitev imenovanj priglašenih organov, bi bilo treba tudi v navedenih primerih slediti postopku za imenovanje organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti.
The need for control and monitoring of notified bodies by the designating authorities has increased since technical progress has raised the risk that notified bodies do not possess the necessary competence with regard to new technologies or devices emerging within their scope of designation.
Potreba, da bi organi za imenovanje nadzirali in spremljali priglašene organe, se je povečala, odkar se je zaradi tehničnega napredka pojavilo tveganje, da priglašeni organi na svojem področju imenovanja nimajo potrebne kompetence v zvezi z novimi tehnologijami ali pripomočki.
As technical progress shortens product cycles and as the intervals of surveillance on-site assessments and of the monitoring vary between designating authorities, minimum requirements with regard to the intervals of the surveillance and monitoring of the notified bodies should be established and unannounced or short-notice on-site assessments should be organised.
Ker tehnični napredek krajša cikle proizvodov in ker se pogostnost nadzornih pregledov na kraju samem in spremljanja med organi za imenovanje razlikuje, bi bilo treba uvesti in objaviti minimalne zahteve v zvezi s pogostnostjo nadzora in spremljanja priglašenih organov ali organizirati nenapovedane ali na kratek rok napovedane preglede na kraju samem.
When, in spite of the measures taken to ensure a coherent application and follow up of the requirements by the Member States, the competence of a notified body is in doubt, the Commission should have the possibility to investigate individual cases.
Kadar je kljub uvedenim ukrepom za zagotavljanje usklajene uporabe in spremljanja zahtev s strani držav članic vprašljiva kompetenca priglašenega organa, bi moralo biti Komisiji omogočeno, da razišče posamezne primere.
The need for investigation by the Commission is exacerbated since technical progress has increased the risk that notified bodies do not possess the necessary competence with regard to new technologies or products falling under their scope of designation.
Potreba po preiskavi s strani Komisije se je povečala, ker se je zaradi tehničnega napredka povečalo tudi tveganje, da priglašeni organi v zvezi z novimi tehnologijami ali proizvodi, ki spadajo na njihovo področje imenovanja, nimajo potrebne kompetence.
In order to increase transparency and mutual trust and to further align and develop their designation, extension and renewal procedures, above all in a view of new emerging interpretative questions regarding new technologies and devices, Member States should cooperate with each other and with the Commission.
Države članice bi morale med seboj in s Komisijo sodelovati, da bi povečale preglednost in vzajemno zaupanje ter nadaljnje usklajevanje in razvoj postopkov za imenovanje ter njegovo podaljšanje in obnovitev, predvsem ob upoštevanju novih vprašanj razlage v zvezi z novimi tehnologijami in pripomočki.
They should consult each other and the Commission on questions with general relevance for the implementation of this Regulation and inform each other and the Commission on their model assessment checklist, which constitutes the basis for their assessment practice.
Med seboj in s Komisijo bi se morale posvetovati o vprašanjih, ki so splošno pomembna za izvajanje te uredbe, ter druga drugo in Komisijo obveščati o svojih modelih kontrolnega seznama za ocenjevanje, ki so podlaga za njihovo prakso ocenjevanja.
The increased complexity of the tasks regarding the designation of the conformity assessment bodies, reflecting the increasing complexity of the work of those bodies, requires significant resources.
Povečana zahtevnost nalog v zvezi z imenovanjem organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti, ki kaže na rastočo zahtevnost dela teh organov, zahteva tudi znatna sredstva.
Therefore, requirements should be imposed on the Member States with regard to the minimum level of available competent personnel, able and entrusted to operate in an independent way.
Zato bi morale države članice izpolniti zahteve v zvezi z najnižjo ravnjo razpoložljivega strokovnega osebja, ki je sposobno in se mu zaupa, da deluje neodvisno.
Designating authorities who are not in charge of market surveillance and vigilance for medical devices are not necessarily aware of deficiencies in the work of notified bodies which were spotted by the competent authorities when doing product checks.
Organi za imenovanje, ki niso odgovorni za nadzor trga in vigilanco medicinskih pripomočkov, se morda ne zavedajo pomanjkljivosti priglašenih organov pri delu, ki so jih opazili pristojni organi med izvajanjem pregledov proizvodov.
Furthermore, the designating authorities do not necessarily have all the product related knowledge which is sometimes needed to assess whether the notified bodies worked properly.
Poleg tega organi za imenovanje morda niso poučeni o vsem v zvezi z zadevnimi proizvodi, kar je včasih potrebno za ocenjevanje, ali so priglašeni organi ustrezno delali.
Therefore, the designating authorities should consult the competent authorities.
Zato bi se morali organi za imenovanje posvetovati s pristojnimi organi.
Where designation is based on accreditation in the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 [3], in order to ensure a transparent and coherent application of the criteria set out in Annex 8 to Directive 90/385/EEC and Annex XI to Directive 93/42/EEC, accreditation bodies on the one hand, and designating and competent authorities on the other hand should exchange information relevant for the assessment of notified bodies.
Kadar imenovanje temelji na akreditaciji v smislu Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. julija 2008 o določitvi zahtev za akreditacijo in nadzor trga v zvezi s trženjem proizvodov ter razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 339/93 [3], bi si morali akreditacijski organi na eni strani ter organi za imenovanje in pristojni organi na drugi strani izmenjati informacije, pomembne za ocenjevanje priglašenih organov, da bi s tem zagotovili pregledno in usklajeno uporabo meril, navedenih v Prilogi 8 k Direktivi 90/385/EGS in Prilogi XI k Direktivi 93/42/EGS.
The need for this exchange of information has proven to be particularly strong in respect to the conformity assessment bodies’ practices with regard to new technologies and devices and their ability to cover those technologies and devices and thus to fulfil the criteria for designation set out in Directive 90/385/EEC and Directive 93/42/EEC.
Potreba po tej izmenjavi informacij se je izkazala za zlasti pomembno v zvezi s prakso organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti, in sicer glede novih tehnologij in pripomočkov ter njihovo sposobnostjo za pokritje navedenih tehnologij in pripomočkov in s tem po izpolnjevanju meril za imenovanje, navedenih v direktivah 90/385/EGS in 93/42/EGS.
It is appropriate to provide for a phase-in period, so as to give designating authorities time to build up the necessary additional resources and adapt their procedures.
Primerno je določiti obdobje postopnega uvajanja, da bi organi za imenovanje imeli čas za razvoj potrebnih dodatnih virov in prilagoditev svojih postopkov.
The complex technical and production developments have led some notified bodies to outsource parts of their assessments.
Zaradi zapletenega tehničnega in zahtevnega proizvodnega poteka razvoja so nekateri priglašeni organi oddali dele svojega ocenjevanja v zunanje izvajanje.
It is therefore necessary to set the limits and to determine under which conditions this can be done.
Zato je treba postaviti omejitve in določiti pogoje, pod katerimi se to lahko stori.
Notified bodies should be in control of their subcontractors and of their subsidiaries.
Priglašeni organi bi morali nadzorovati svoje podizvajalce in pomožne organe.
They need to be endowed with the appropriate resources, including fully qualified staff to make their own assessments or to review the assessments made by external experts.
Morajo imeti ustrezna sredstva, vključno s polno usposobljenim osebjem, za podajo svojih ocen ali pregled ocen, ki so jih podali zunanji strokovnjaki.