natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the intervention is ancillary to the main proceedings, the intervener must refrain from repeating in his statement the pleas in law and arguments in the written pleadings of the party which he is supporting and must set out only additional pleas in law or arguments which bear out that party’s submissions.
Ker je namreč intervencija v razmerju do spora o glavni stvari akcesorna, se mora intervenient v vlogi izogibati ponavljanju razlogov in trditev, ki so navedeni v vlogah stranke, za katero intervenira, ter navesti samo dodatne razloge in trditve, ki potrjujejo tezo te stranke.
Recapitulation of the factual or legal background to the case is not necessary, except in so far as its presentation in the written pleadings of the main parties is disputed or, exceptionally, calls for further particulars.
Ponovno navajanje pravnega in dejanskega okvira spora je odveč, razen če se njegovemu prikazu v vlogah glavnih strank nasprotuje ali če so potrebna dodatna pojasnila.
After the statement in intervention has been lodged, the President may, if he considers this necessary, prescribe a time-limit for the submission of brief observations on that statement.
Če predsednik presodi, da je to potrebno, lahko po vložitvi intervencijske vloge določi rok za predložitev kratkih stališč glede te vloge.
The lodging of those observations, the length of which should not exceed five pages, is nevertheless optional.
Vendar vložitev teh stališč, ki naj ne bi bila daljša od petih strani, ni obvezna.
The purpose of such observations is merely to enable the main parties to respond to inaccurate claims or to adopt a position on new pleas in law or arguments raised by the intervener.
Cilj teh stališč je glavnim strankam omogočiti, da se odzovejo na nenatančne navedbe ali da zavzamejo stališče glede novih razlogov ali trditev intervenienta.
Where there are no such matters, it is recommended that the parties desist from lodging those observations in order to avoid unnecessarily prolonging the written part of the procedure.
Če takih elementov ni, se priporoča, naj se stališč ne vlaga, da se pisnega dela postopka ne podaljšuje po nepotrebnem.
In so far as it meets the conditions set out in Article 130(2) to (4) of the Rules of Procedure, the Court may also give consideration to an application to intervene made after the passing of the time-limit prescribed in Article 130(1) or 190(2) of the Rules of Procedure, provided, however, that that application reaches it before the decision to open the oral part of the procedure provided for in Article 60(4) of those Rules is adopted.
Sodišče lahko upošteva predlog za intervencijo, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 130(2) do (4) Poslovnika, čeprav je vložen po izteku roka iz členov 130(1) ali 190(2) Poslovnika, če ga prejme pred sprejetjem odločbe o začetku ustnega dela postopka na podlagi člena 60(4) navedenega poslovnika.
In that case, the intervener will be able to submit his observations, if any, during the hearing, if it takes place.
V takem primeru lahko intervenient predstavi svoja morebitna stališča na obravnavi, če se ta opravi.
The same is true in general in the context of an application for interim measures or where a case is to be dealt with under an expedited procedure.
Načeloma velja enako v okviru predloga za izdajo začasne odredbe ali hitrega postopka.
If there are no special circumstances warranting the lodging of written observations, the person or entity authorised to intervene in the context of such a procedure may submit his observations only orally, if a hearing is organised.
Razen v posebnih okoliščinah, ki upravičujejo predložitev pisnih stališč, lahko oseba ali subjekt, ki ima pravico do intervencije v takem postopku, svoja stališča poda le ustno, če se opravi obravnava.
The above rules on intervention are, in contrast, not applicable to references for a preliminary ruling.
Zgoraj navedena pravila v zvezi z intervencijo pa ne veljajo za postopek predhodnega odločanja.
Due to the non-adversarial nature of that category of cases and the special function of the Court when it is called upon to give a preliminary ruling on the interpretation or validity of European Union law, only the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute are authorised to submit observations, written or oral, on the questions submitted to the Court by the courts or tribunals of the Member States.
Ker ta vrsta zadev nima narave spora in ker ima Sodišče pri predhodnem odločanju o razlagi ali veljavnosti prava Unije posebno vlogo, lahko pisna ali ustna stališča glede vprašanj, ki jih Sodišču predložijo sodišča držav članic, podajo samo zainteresirani subjekti iz člena 23 Statuta.
Irrespective of the foregoing matters and the prerequisites relating to the content of procedural documents resulting from the provisions of the Statute and the Rules of Procedure, the written pleadings and observations lodged before the Court must meet certain additional requirements intended to facilitate the reading and processing of those documents by the Court, in particular by electronic means.
Ne glede na navedeno in na zahteve v zvezi z vsebino procesnih aktov, ki izhajajo iz določb Statuta in Poslovnika, morajo vloge in pisna stališča, ki se predložijo Sodišču, izpolnjevati nekatere dodatne zahteve za lažje branje in obdelavo teh aktov s strani Sodišča, zlasti v elektronski obliki.
Those requirements concern the form and the presentation of procedural documents as well as their length or structure.
Te zahteve se nanašajo na obliko in videz teh procesnih aktov ter na njihovo zgradbo in dolžino.
As to the formal conditions, first of all, it is essential that the written pleadings or observations lodged by the parties are presented in a form in which they can be processed electronically by the Court and that, in particular, documents can be scanned and character recognition used.
Kar zadeva obliko, je najprej nujno, da so vloge in stališča, ki jih vložijo stranke, predloženi v obliki, ki omogoča elektronsko obdelavo teh aktov na Sodišču, zlasti možnost preslikave in prepoznave znakov.
To that end, the following requirements must be taken into account:
Za to je treba upoštevati te zahteve:
the written pleadings or observations are to be drafted on white, unlined and A4-size paper, with text on one side of the page only (recto), and not on both sides of the page (recto-verso),
vloge in stališča morajo biti na brezčrtnem belem papirju formata A4; besedilo mora biti napisano samo na eni strani papirja („enostransko“), in ne na obeh straneh („dvostransko“),
the text is to be in a commonly-used font (such as Times New Roman, Courier or Arial), in at least 12 point in the body of the text and at least 10 point in the footnotes, with 1,5 line spacing and horizontal and vertical margins of at least 2,5 cm (above, below, at the left and at the right of the page),
besedilo mora biti v tipu pisave, ki se običajno uporablja (kot na primer: Times New Roman, Courier ali Arial) in velikosti najmanj 12 točk v besedilu in 10 točk za opombe, z medvrstičnim razmikom 1,5, z robovi najmanj 2,5 cm vodoravno in navpično (zgoraj, spodaj, levo in desno na strani),
all the paragraphs of the written pleadings or observations are to be numbered consecutively,
vsi odstavki vlog in stališč morajo biti oštevilčeni z zaporednimi naraščajočimi številkami,
the same is true for the pages of the written pleadings or observations, including any annexes to them and their schedule, which are to be numbered consecutively, at the top right-hand corner,
enako velja za strani vlog in stališč, vključno z njihovimi morebitnimi prilogami in seznamom, ki morajo biti oštevilčeni zgoraj desno, z zaporednimi naraščajočimi številkami,
lastly, where they are not sent to the Court by electronic means, pages of written pleadings or observations are to be assembled in such a way as to be easily separable and not permanently attached by means such as glue or staples.
nazadnje, če se vloge ali stališča pri Sodišču ne vložijo elektronsko, morajo biti njihove strani spete tako, da jih je mogoče preprosto razpeti, in ne trajno vezane, na primer z lepilom ali spenjačem.
In addition to these formal requirements, the procedural documents lodged before the Court must be drafted in a form which allows their structure and scope to be grasped from the first few pages.
Poleg teh zahtev glede oblike morajo biti procesni akti, ki se predložijo Sodišču, sestavljeni tako, da je mogoče že iz prvih nekaj strani razbrati njihovo zgradbo in predmet.
Besides stating, on the first page of the written pleadings or observations concerned, the title of the document, the case number (if it has already been notified by the Registry) and the parties concerned (parties to the dispute in the main proceedings, the applicant (appellant) and the defendant (respondent) or parties to the case at issue before the General Court), the written pleadings or observations lodged are to begin with a brief summary of the schema adopted by the author or by a table of contents.
Na začetku predložene vloge ali stališč se poleg naslova tega akta, številke zadeve (če jo je sodno tajništvo že sporočilo) in strank, na katere se nanaša (stranke v sporu o glavni stvari, tožeča in tožena stranka ali stranke postopka pred Splošnim sodiščem), navede kratka predstavitev načrta avtorja ali kazalo.
Those written pleadings or those observations must end with the forms of order sought by the author or, in preliminary ruling proceedings, by the answers which the author proposes to the questions of the referring court or tribunal.
Ta vloga ali stališča se končajo s predlogi avtorja, v postopku predhodnega odločanja pa s predlaganimi odgovori na vprašanja, ki jih je postavilo predložitveno sodišče.
Although the documents which are sent to the Court are not subject, as regards their content, to any requirement other than those resulting from the Statute and the Rules of Procedure, it must nevertheless be borne in mind that such documents constitute the basis for the Court’s study of the file and that they must, as a general rule, be translated by the Court or the institution which produced them.
Čeprav za vsebino aktov, ki se predložijo Sodišču, ne veljajo nobene druge zahteve razen tistih, ki izhajajo iz Statuta in Poslovnika, je treba vedeti, da so ti akti podlaga, da Sodišče spis lahko preuči, zato jih mora samo ali institucija, ki jih je sestavila, načeloma prevesti.
In the interests of the proper conduct of the procedure as in the interests of the parties themselves, the written pleadings or observations must therefore be drafted in clear, concise language, without use of technical terms specific to a national legal system.
V interesu nemotenega poteka postopka in v interesu strank naj bo zato jezik predloženih vlog in stališč jasen in natančen, brez tehničnih izrazov posameznih nacionalnih pravnih sistemov.
Repetition must be avoided and short sentences must, as far as possible, be used in preference to long and complex sentences which include parenthetical and subordinate clauses.
Izogibati se je treba ponavljanju; kolikor je mogoče, pa naj se raje kot dolge in zapletene povedi z vrinjenimi stavki in podredji uporabljajo kratke povedi.
When, in their written pleadings or observations, the parties refer to a specific text or piece of legislation, of national or European Union law, references to that text or legislation must be accurately cited, both so far as concerns the date of adoption and, where possible, the date of publication of that document and so far as concerns its temporal applicability.
Kadar se stranke v vlogi ali stališčih sklicujejo na posamezno besedilo ali predpis nacionalnega prava ali prava Unije, je treba natančno navesti reference tega besedila ali predpisa, vključno z datumom sprejetja in, če je mogoče, datumom objave tega dokumenta ter njegovo časovno uporabo.
Likewise, when they cite an extract or a passage of a judgment or of an Opinion of an Advocate General, the parties are requested to specify both the name and number of the case concerned and the exact references of the extract or the passage at issue.
Prav tako naj stranke pri citiranju izvlečka ali odlomka sodne odločbe ali sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca navedejo zadevo in njeno številko ter natančne reference zadevnega izvlečka ali odlomka.
Lastly, it must be pointed out that legal argument of the parties or the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute must appear in the written pleadings or observations, and not in any attached annexes, which are not as a general rule translated.
Nazadnje je treba opozoriti, da mora biti pravna utemeljitev strank ali zainteresiranih subjektov iz člena 23 Statuta v vlogah ali pisnih stališčih, in ne v morebitnih prilogah, ki se praviloma ne prevajajo.
Only documents mentioned in the actual body of written pleadings or observations and necessary in order to prove or illustrate its contents may be submitted as annexes.
K vlogi ali stališčem se priložijo samo listine, ki so navedene v besedilu te vloge ali stališč in so potrebne za dokazovanje ali pojasnjevanje njihove vsebine.
Annexes are furthermore not accepted, pursuant to Article 57(4) of the Rules of Procedure, unless they are accompanied by a schedule of annexes.
Poleg tega je predložitev prilog v skladu s členom 57(4) Poslovnika dopustna samo, če je priložen seznam prilog.
That schedule is to indicate, for each document annexed, the number of the annex, a short description of the document and the page or paragraph of the written pleadings or observations in which the document is cited and which justifies its production.
Na tem seznamu so za vsako priloženo listino navedeni številka priloge, njen kratek opis in stran ali odstavek vloge ali stališč, kjer je listina omenjena in ki upravičuje njeno predložitev.
Only the documents expressly provided for by the procedural rules may be lodged at the Registry.
V sodnem tajništvu se lahko vložijo samo akti, ki so izrecno navedeni v postopkovnih pravilih.
Those documents must be lodged within the prescribed time-limits and observing the requirements set out in Article 57 of the Rules of Procedure.
Te akte je treba vložiti v določenih rokih, ob spoštovanju zahtev iz člena 57 Poslovnika.
Documents may be lodged electronically or by post, or delivered in person to the Court Registry or, outside the opening hours of the Registry, to the reception of the Court buildings (rue du Fort Niedergrünewald) where the janitor will acknowledge receipt of that document by recording on it the date and time of lodgement.
Vložitev je mogoča po elektronski poti, po pošti ali s fizično izročitvijo v sodnem tajništvu Sodišča, zunaj uradnih ur sodnega tajništva pa na vhodu v zgradbe Sodišča (Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald), kjer pristojni uslužbenec potrdi prejem tega akta tako, da nanj zapiše datum in uro vložitve.
The most reliable, quickest way to lodge a procedural document is by using the e-Curia application.
Najvarnejša in najhitrejša je vložitev procesnega akta prek aplikacije e-Curia.
The procedure for access to the e-Curia application and its conditions of use are described in detail in the Decision of the Court of 13 September 2011 on the lodging and service of procedural documents by means of e-Curia and in the conditions of use to which that decision refers.
Pogoji za dostop in uporabo aplikacije e-Curia so natančno opisani v Odločbi Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2011 o vlaganju in vročanju procesnih aktov prek aplikacije e-Curia in v Pogojih uporabe, na katere se sklicuje ta odločba.
Those documents are available on the Court’s internet site (under ‘Court of Justice — Procedure’).
Ta dokumenta sta dostopna na spletnem mestu Sodišča (pod rubriko Sodišče – Postopek).
If it is not transmitted to the Court by means of the abovementioned application, a procedural document may also be sent to the Court by post.
Če se procesni akt ne vloži prek zgoraj navedene aplikacije, ga je mogoče Sodišču poslati po pošti.
The envelope containing that document must be addressed to the Court Registry at the following address: Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald — L-2925 Luxembourg.
Kuverto s tem aktom je treba nasloviti na sodno tajništvo Sodišča na naslov: Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald – L-2925 Luxembourg.
In this connection, it is appropriate to mention that pursuant to Article 57(7) of the Rules of Procedure, only the date and time of lodgement of the original at the Registry are taken into consideration in the calculation of procedural time-limits.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da se na podlagi člena 57(7) Poslovnika z vidika procesnih rokov upoštevata le dan in ura vložitve izvirnika v sodnem tajništvu.
To prevent any time-barring, it is therefore strongly recommended that it be sent by registered post or by express delivery, several days before the passing of the time-limit prescribed for lodgement of the document.
Da ne pride do prekluzije, se zato priporoča pošiljanje s priporočeno pošiljko ali s hitro pošto več dni pred iztekom roka, določenega za vložitev akta.
At the present time, a copy of the signed original of a procedural document may also be transmitted to the Registry by fax ((+ 352 433766) or as an attachment to an electronic mail (ecj.registry@curia.europa.eu). However, a document lodged by either of these methods will be treated as complying with the relevant time-limit only if the signed original itself, together with the annexes and copies referred to in Article 57(2) of the Rules of Procedure, reaches the Registry at the latest 10 days after that electronic mail or telefax was sent. That original must therefore be sent without delay, immediately after the dispatch of the copy, without any corrections or amendments, even of a minor nature. In the event of any discrepancy between the signed original and the copy previously transmitted, only the date on which the signed original was lodged will be taken into consideration.
Trenutno se lahko prepis podpisanega izvirnika procesnega akta v sodno tajništvo pošlje tudi po telefaksu ((+ 352) 43 37 66) ali kot priponka elektronskemu pismu (ecj.registry@curia.europa.eu). Taka vložitev procesnega akta se za spoštovanje procesnih rokov upošteva samo, če sodno tajništvo podpisani izvirnik akta, skupaj s prilogami in prepisi iz člena 57(2) Poslovnika, prejme najpozneje v desetih dneh po odposlanem telefaksu ali elektronskem pismu. Ta izvirnik je treba poslati nemudoma po tem, ko je bil poslan prepis, ne da bi bili vanj vneseni kakršni koli popravki ali spremembe. Če se podpisani izvirnik in predhodno vloženi prepis razlikujeta, se upošteva samo dan vložitve podpisanega izvirnika.
As is apparent from the fourth paragraph of Article 20 of the Statute, the oral part of the procedure essentially consists of two distinct stages: the hearing of the parties or interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute and the presentation of the Advocate General’s Opinion.
Kot je razvidno iz člena 20, četrti odstavek, Statuta, ustni del postopka v bistvu zajema dve ločeni fazi: zaslišanje strank ali zainteresiranih subjektov iz člena 23 Statuta in predstavitev sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca.
Under the fifth paragraph of Article 20 of the Statute, the Court may nevertheless decide, where it considers that the case raises no new point of law, that the case is to be determined without hearing the Advocate General’s Opinion.
Vendar lahko Sodišče v skladu s členom 20, peti odstavek, Statuta, če meni, da zadeva ne zastavlja nobenega novega pravnega vprašanja, sklene, da se o zadevi odloča brez sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca.
Having regard to the importance of the written part of the procedure in cases brought before the Court and subject to the application of Article 76(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the decisive criterion for holding a hearing is not so much whether an express request has been made to that effect as the assessment made by the Court itself as to the potential contribution of that hearing to the outcome of the dispute or to determining the answers which it could provide to the questions referred by a court or tribunal of a Member State.
Glede na pomen pisnega dela postopka v zadevah, ki so predložene Sodišču, in ob upoštevanju člena 76(3) Poslovnika za izvedbo obravnave ni tako pomemben izrecen predlog, naj se ta opravi, temveč bolj presoja Sodišča o morebitni koristnosti te obravnave za razrešitev spora ali opredelitev odgovorov, ki bi jih lahko dalo na vprašanja, ki jih je postavilo sodišče države članice.
A hearing is therefore arranged by the Court whenever it is likely to contribute to a better understanding of the case and the issues raised by it, whether or not a request to that effect has been made by the parties or the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute.
Sodišče zato opravi obravnavo vsakič, ko bi ta lahko prispevala k boljšemu razumevanju zadeve in njenega pomena, ne glede na to, ali so stranke ali zainteresirani subjekti iz člena 23 Statuta to predlagali.
Where those parties or interested persons consider that a hearing must be arranged in a case, the onus is on them, in any event, as soon as they have received notification of the end of the written part of the procedure, to inform the Court by letter why they wish be heard.
Če te stranke ali zainteresirani subjekti menijo, da je treba v zadevi opraviti obravnavo, morajo Sodišču ob koncu pisnega dela postopka takoj pisno sporočiti, zakaj želijo ustno podati navedbe.
That reasoning — which is not to be confused with written pleadings or observations and should not exceed three pages — must be based on a real assessment of the benefit of a hearing to the party in question and must indicate the documentary elements or arguments which that party considers it necessary to develop or disprove more fully at the hearing.
Ta obrazložitev – ki se ne sme zamenjati z vlogo ali pisnimi stališči in ki naj ne bi bila daljša od treh strani – mora izhajati iz konkretne presoje koristnosti obravnave za zadevno stranko, v njej pa je treba navesti elemente v spisu ali utemeljitev, za katere ta stranka meni, da jih je treba razviti ali na tej obravnavi dodatno izpodbijati.
It is not in itself sufficient to provide a general statement of reasons referring, for example, to the importance of the case or of the questions to be decided by the Court.
Splošna obrazložitev, ki se na primer sklicuje na pomembnost zadeve ali vprašanj, o katerih mora Sodišče odločiti, sama po sebi ne zadostuje.
When the Court decides to arrange a hearing in a particular case, it fixes the exact date and time and the parties or interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute are immediately sent a letter of notice to attend by the Registry, which also notifies them of the composition of the formation to which the Court has assigned the case, of any measures of organisation of procedure decided on by the Court and, where applicable, that there is to be no Advocate General’s Opinion.
Če Sodišče odloči, da se v posamezni zadevi opravi obravnava, določi dan in uro obravnave, sodno tajništvo pa takoj pošlje vabilo strankam ali zainteresiranim subjektom iz člena 23 Statuta in jih obvesti o sestavi, ki ji je Sodišče dodelilo zadevo, o ukrepih procesnega vodstva, ki jih je to odredilo, in, če je tak primer, o tem, da bo odločeno brez sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca.
In order to enable the Court to arrange that hearing in the best possible conditions, the parties or abovementioned interested persons are requested to reply to the Registry’s letter within a short period stating, in particular, whether they intend actually to attend the hearing and the name of the lawyer or agent who will represent them at it.
Za zagotovitev, da bo Sodišče to obravnavo opravilo v najboljših mogočih razmerah, se navedene stranke ali zainteresirane subjekte poziva, naj na dopis sodnega tajništva odgovorijo v kar najkrajšem času, pri čemer naj zlasti navedejo, ali se nameravajo obravnave udeležiti, in sporočijo ime odvetnika ali agenta, ki jih bo na njej zastopal.