natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
individuals or entities acting on behalf of or at the direction of a designated individual or entity, or acting on behalf of or at the direction of an entity owned or controlled by a designated individual or entity;
posameznike ali subjekte, ki delujejo v imenu ali po navodilih posameznika ali subjekta, uvrščenega na seznam, ali v imenu ali po navodilih subjekta, ki je v lasti posameznika ali subjekta, uvrščenega na seznam, ali ga ta posameznik ali subjekt nadzoruje;
individuals or entities who plan, direct, sponsor or participate in attacks against peacekeepers of the United Nations Organisation Stabilisation Mission in the DRC (MONUSCO);
posameznike ali subjekte, ki načrtujejo, vodijo, finančno podpirajo ali sodelujejo v napadih proti pripadnikom mirovnih sil stabilizacijske misije Organizacije združenih narodov v Demokratični republiki Kongo (MONUSCO);
individuals or entities providing financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to, or in support of a designated individual or entity.
posameznike ali subjekte, ki zagotavljajo finančno, materialno ali tehnološko podporo ali blago ali storitve posamezniku ali subjektu, uvrščenemu na seznam, ali tega posameznika ali ta subjekt podpirajo.
The relevant persons and entities are listed in the Annex.".
Zadevne osebe in subjekti so navedeni v Prilogi.“
Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP of 20 December 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo and repealing Common Position 2008/369/CFSP (OJ L 336, 21.12.2010, p. 30).
Sklep Sveta 2010/788/SZVP z dne 20. decembra 2010 o omejitvenih ukrepih proti Demokratični republiki Kongo in razveljavitvi Skupnega stališča 2008/369/SZVP (UL L 336, 21.12.2010, str. 30).
amending Decision 2011/130/EU establishing minimum requirements for the cross-border processing of documents signed electronically by competent authorities under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market
o spremembi Sklepa 2011/130/EU o določitvi minimalnih zahtev glede čezmejne obdelave dokumentov z elektronskim podpisom pristojnih organov v skladu z Direktivo 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu
(notified under document C(2014) 1640)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 1640)
The cross-border use of advanced electronic signatures supported by a qualified certificate is facilitated through Commission Decision 2009/767/EC of 16 October 2009 setting out measures facilitating the use of procedures by electronic means through the ‘points of single contact’ under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market [2] which, inter alia, imposes an obligation on Member States to carry out risk assessments before requiring these electronic signatures from service providers and establishes rules for the acceptance by Member States of advanced electronic signatures based on qualified certificates, created with or without a secure signature creation device.
Čezmejno uporabo izpopolnjenih elektronskih podpisov, podprtih s kvalificiranim potrdilom, omogoča Odločba Komisije 2009/767/ES z dne 16. oktobra 2009 o vzpostavitvi ukrepov za pospeševanje uporabe postopkov po elektronski poti s pomočjo „enotnih kontaktnih točk“ po Direktivi 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu [2], ki med drugim določa obveznost držav članic, da izvedejo ocene tveganja, preden od ponudnikov storitev zahtevajo te elektronske podpise, in določa pravila, po katerih države članice sprejmejo izpopolnjene elektronske podpise na podlagi kvalificiranih potrdil, narejene z napravo za varno elektronsko podpisovanje ali brez nje.
Initially only the basic level of ETSI standardised formats of advanced e-signatures were covered by the Decision.
Odločba je na začetku zajemala le osnovno raven standardiziranih oblik Evropskega inštituta za telekomunikacijske standarde (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ETSI) v zvezi z izpopolnjenimi elektronskimi podpisi.
It is appropriate to add also longer term levels of ETSI standardised formats which facilitate the preservation of validity related information of e-signatures over time.
Treba bi bilo dodati še dolgoročnejše ravni standardiziranih oblik ETSI, ki omogočajo ohranjanje informacij v zvezi z veljavnostjo elektronskih podpisov v daljšem časovnem obdobju.
New technical specifications have been published by ETSI for baseline profiles for advanced e-signatures that aim at limiting the choices in the relevant standards and thereby increase cross-border interoperability.
ETSI je objavil nove tehnične specifikacije za osnovne profile za izpopolnjene elektronske podpise, katerih cilj je omejevanje izbire ustreznih standardov, s tem pa povečanje čezmejne interoperabilnosti.
These profiles cover all conformance levels, from the basic to long term level.
Ti profili zajemajo vse ravni skladnosti, od osnovne do dolgoročne.
For the purpose of allowing Member States to implement the necessary technical tools, it is appropriate that this Decision applies as of 1 December 2014.
Da bi lahko države članice vzpostavile potrebna tehnična orodja, je ustrezno, da se začne ta sklep uporabljati 1. decembra 2014.
Amendments to Commission Decision 2011/130/EU [3]Decision 2011/130/EU is amended as follows:
Spremembe Sklepa Komisije 2011/130/EU [3]Sklep 2011/130/EU se spremeni:
Paragraph 1 of Article 1 is replaced by the following:
odstavek 1 člena 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Member States shall put in place the necessary technical means allowing them to process electronically signed documents that service providers submit in the context of completing procedures and formalities through the Points of Single Contact as foreseen by Article 8 of Directive 2006/123/EC, and which are signed by competent authorities of other Member States with an XML, a CMS or a PDF advanced electronic signature at any conformance level or using an associated signature container at basic level provided these comply with the technical specifications listed in the Annex.’;
Države članice vzpostavijo potrebna tehnična orodja, ki jim omogočajo obdelavo dokumentov z elektronskim podpisom, pri čemer ponudniki storitev te dokumente predložijo v okviru opravljanja postopkov in formalnosti prek enotnih kontaktnih točk, kot to določa člen 8 Direktive 2006/123/ES, ter jih pristojni organi drugih držav članic podpišejo z izpopolnjenim elektronskim podpisom XML, CMS ali PDF na kakršni koli ravni skladnosti ali z uporabo pripadajočega vsebnika podpisa na osnovni ravni, če so te ravni v skladu s tehničnimi specifikacijami iz Priloge.“;
the Annex is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k temu sklepu.
This Decision shall apply from 1 December 2014.
Ta sklep se uporablja od 1. decembra 2014.
LIST OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR XML, CMS OR PDF ADVANCED ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND THE ASSOCIATED SIGNATURE CONTAINER
SEZNAM TEHNIČNIH SPECIFIKACIJ ZA IZPOPOLNJENE ELEKTRONSKE PODPISE XML, CMS ALI PDF TER Z NJIMI POVEZANE VSEBNIKE PODPISA
Advanced electronic signatures mentioned in Article 1 paragraph 1 of the Decision must comply with one of the following ETSI technical specifications:
Izpopolnjeni elektronski podpisi iz člena 1(1) Sklepa morajo biti skladni z eno od naslednjih tehničnih specifikacij ETSI:
Associated signature container mentioned in Article 1 paragraph 1 of the Decision must comply with the following ETSI technical specifications:
Pripadajoči vsebnik podpisa iz člena 1(1) Sklepa mora biti skladen z naslednjimi tehničnimi specifikacijami ETSI:
Associated Signature Container Baseline Profile
Osnovni profil pripadajočega vsebnika podpisa
http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/103100_103199/103174/02.02.01_60/ts_103174v020201p.pdf’
http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/103100_103199/103174/02.02.01_60/ts_103174v020201p.pdf“
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision 2014/148/EU of 17 March 2014 amending Decision 2011/130/EU establishing minimum requirements for the cross-border processing of documents signed electronically by competent authorities under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market
Popravek Izvedbenega sklepa Komisije z dne 17. marca 2014 o spremembi Sklepa 2011/130/EU o določitvi minimalnih zahtev glede čezmejne obdelave dokumentov z elektronskim podpisom pristojnih organov v skladu z Direktivo 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu
(Official Journal of the European Union L 80 of 19 March 2014)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 80 z dne 19. marca 2014)
In the table of contents and on page 7, Commission Implementing Decision 2014/148/EU of 17 March 2014 amending Decision 2011/130/EU establishing minimum requirements for the cross-border processing of documents signed electronically by competent authorities under Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market was published under the wrong heading:
Kazalo na naslovni strani ovitka in stran 7, Izvedbeni sklep Komisije z dne 17. marca 2014 o spremembi Sklepa 2011/130/EU o določitvi minimalnih zahtev glede čezmejne obdelave dokumentov z elektronskim podpisom pristojnih organov v skladu z Direktivo 2006/123/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu je bil objavljen v napačno poimenovanem sklopu:
‘Acts adopted by bodies created by international agreements’,
„Akti, ki jih sprejmejo organi, ustanovljeni z mednarodnimi sporazumi“
‘Decisions’.
„Sklepi“.
of 18 March 2014
z dne 18. marca 2014
rejecting the proposal for an Implementing Regulation reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and produced by Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd and Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co. Ltd
o zavrnitvi predloga izvedbene uredbe o ponovni uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki jo proizvajajo podjetja Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co Ltd in Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co. Ltd
On 5 October 2006 the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 [2] (‘the contested Regulation’), which imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty and collected definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam.
Svet je 5. oktobra 2006 sprejel Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1472/2006 [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: izpodbijana uredba), ki je uvedla dokončno protidampinško dajatev in dokončno pobiranje začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Vietnama.
Following an expiry review, the measures were extended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 [3].
Ukrepi so bili na podlagi pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov podaljšani z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 1294/2009 [3].
The measures expired on 31 March 2011.
Podaljšani ukrepi so prenehali veljati 31. marca 2011.
Certain exporting producers brought actions before the General Court for annulment of the contested Regulation.
Nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki so z vložitvijo tožb pred Splošnim sodiščem skušali doseči razglasitev ničnosti izpodbijane uredbe.
The General Court dismissed these actions [4].
Splošno sodišče je te tožbe zavrnilo.
However, on appeal, the Court of Justice (‘the Court’), in its judgments of 2 February 2012 in Case C-249/10 P, Brosmann et al. v Council, and of 15 November 2012 in Case C-247/10 P, Zhejiang Aokang Shoes v Council (the ‘judgments’), set aside the judgments of the General Court and annulled Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 in so far as it related to the appellants.
Vendar je Sodišče v pritožbenem postopku s sodbama z dne 2. februarja 2012 v zadevi C-249/10 P, Brosmann in drugi proti Svetu, in z dne 15. novembra 2012 v zadevi C-247/10 P, Zhejiang Aokang Shoes proti Svetu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sodbi), sodbi Splošnega sodišča razveljavilo in Uredbo (ES) št. 1472/2006, kolikor je zadevala pritožnike, razglasilo za nično.
In particular, the Court found that the Commission ought to have examined the claims submitted by the appellants for the purpose of claiming Market Economy Treatment (‘MET’) in accordance with Article 2(7)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and that it could not be ruled out that such examination would have led to a lower anti-dumping duty for the appellants.
Sodišče je zlasti ugotovilo, da bi bila Komisija morala preučiti zahtevke, ki so jih pritožniki predložili za odobritev tržnogospodarske obravnave (TGO) v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) in (c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009, in da ni mogoče izključiti, da bi pritožniki v takšnem postopku dosegli nižjo protidampinško dajatev.
By means of a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5], the Commission informed the exporting producers concerned by the judgments that it had decided to resume the procedure for replacing the annulled parts of the contested Regulation and to examine whether market economy conditions prevailed for these producers during the relevant period.
Komisija je z obvestilom, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5] proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki jih zadevata sodbi, sporočila, da je sklenila obnoviti postopek za nadomestitev tistih delov izpodbijane uredbe, ki so bili razglašeni za nične, in preučiti, ali so v zadevnem obdobju za te proizvajalce prevladovali pogoji tržnega gospodarstva.
On 19 February 2014, the Commission adopted the proposal for a Council Implementing Regulation reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and produced by Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd and Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co. Ltd (‘the proposal’).
Komisija je 19. februarja 2014 sprejela predlog za izvedbeno uredbo Sveta o ponovni uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki jo proizvajajo podjetja Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co Ltd in Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co. Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu: predlog).
The proposal states that the examination of the MET claims showed that market economy conditions did not prevail during the relevant period for the exporting producers concerned by the judgments, that MET must therefore be denied from these exporting producers and that the anti-dumping duty originally imposed by the contested Regulation should consequently be reinstated.
V predlogu je zapisano, da se je ob preučitvi zahtev za odobritev TGO pokazalo, da v zadevnem obdobju za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jih zadevata sodbi, niso prevladovali pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, da jim je zato treba TGO odreči in da bi bilo posledično treba ponovno uvesti protidampinško dajatev, ki je bila prvotno uvedena z izpodbijano uredbo.
To this effect, the proposal would reinstate a definitive anti-dumping duty for the exporting producers concerned by the judgments for the period of application of the contested Regulation.
Tako bi bila s predlogom ponovno uvedena dokončna protidampinška dajatev za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jih zadevata sodbi, za obdobje uporabe izpodbijane uredbe.
Article 1(4) of the proposal reads as follows: ‘The provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply, with the exception of Article 221 of the Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/1992 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code [6]. Communication to the debtor of the amount of duty may take place more than three years after the customs debt was incurred, but no later than two years after the entry into force of this Regulation.’.
Besedilo člena 1(4) predloga se glasi: „Uporabljajo se veljavne določbe v zvezi s carinskimi dajatvami z izjemo člena 221 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/1992 dne 12. oktobra 1992 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [6]. Sporočilo dolžniku o znesku dajatve se lahko pošlje po roku treh let od datuma, ko je carinski dolg nastal, vendar najpozneje dve leti po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.“
Article 221(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/1992 (‘Customs Code’) time-bars the communication of the reimposed anti-dumping duty to the debtor for any imports which took place over three years ago, provided that the period was not suspended pending an appeal under Article 243 of the Customs Code.
V skladu s členom 221(3) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2913/1992 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: carinski zakonik) se obveščanje dolžnika o ponovno uvedeni protidampinški dajatvi ne opravi v zvezi z uvozom, ki je bil izveden pred več kot tremi leti, pod pogojem, da ta rok ni bil odložen za obdobje pritožbenega postopka na podlagi člena 243 carinskega zakonika.
Article 1(4) of the contested Regulation provided that, unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs duties applied, and it did not contain any derogation from Article 221(3) of the Customs Code.
Člen 1(4) izpodbijane uredbe določa, da se uporabljajo veljavne carinske določbe, razen če ni drugače določeno, ni pa določenega odstopanja od člena 221(3) carinskega zakonika.
To the extent that the original communication of the debt to the debtor was withdrawn following the judgments, the operators could legitimately expect that, once the three-year period prescribed by Article 221(3) of the Customs Code had expired, any reimposition of the debt was time-barred and, consequently, the debt was ‘extinguished’ [7].
Kolikor je bilo po sodbah preklicano prvotno obvestilo dolžniku o dolgu, bi lahko gospodarski subjekti utemeljeno pričakovali, da bo po izteku obdobja treh let, določenega s členom 221(3) carinskega zakonika, morebitna ponovna uvedba dolga zastarala in da je torej dolg „ugasnil“.
Once the debt was extinguished pursuant to Article 221(3), its retroactive reimposition would therefore infringe the legitimate expectations of the operators concerned.In conclusion, the assessment of the Council is that a retroactive application of the derogation from Article 221(3) of the Customs Code is not possible in this case, as it would infringe the legitimate expectations of the operators concerned.
Potem ko je dolg ugasnil na podlagi člena 221(3), bi se z njegovo retroaktivno ponovno uvedbo kršila utemeljena pričakovanja zadevnih gospodarskih subjektov.Svet zaključuje, da v tem primeru retroaktivna uporaba odstopanja od člena 221(3) carinskega zakonika ni mogoča, ker bi se s tem kršila utemeljena pričakovanja zadevnih gospodarskih subjektov.
Without the retroactive derogation from Article 221(3), the reimposition of duties would have a very limited financial effect in practice, since the original measures expired on 31 March 2011.
Brez retroaktivnega odstopanja od člena 221(3) bi imela ponovna uvedba dajatev v praksi zelo omejen finančni učinek, saj so prvotni ukrepi prenehali veljati 31. marca 2011.
Furthermore, the complainants did not provide elements demonstrating that the adoption of the proposed measure would have an impact on them.
Pritožniki poleg tega niso predložili dokazov, da bi sprejetje predlaganega ukrepa nanje vplivalo.
The Court has annulled the contested Regulation in its entirety, in so far as it relates to the appellants.
Sodišče je izpodbijano uredbo v celoti razglasilo za nično, kolikor zadeva pritožnike.
As a consequence, the effect of the judgments with respect to the measure annulled is not dependent on an additional act to be adopted by the Institutions.
Učinek sodb v zvezi z ukrepom, razglašenim za ničnega, zato ni odvisen od dodatnega akta, ki naj bi ga sprejele institucije.
The Council therefore concludes that Article 266 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union does not oblige the Institutions to reimpose the duties in the present case,
Svet zato sklepa, da člen 266 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije institucij v tem primeru ne obvezuje k ponovni uvedbi dajatev –
The proposal for a Council Implementing Regulation reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and produced by Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co. Ltd and Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co. Ltd is rejected and the proceedings with regard to these producers are terminated.
Predlog izvedbene uredbe Sveta o ponovni uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki jo proizvajajo podjetja Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co Ltd in Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co. Ltd, se zavrne, postopki v zvezi s temi proizvajalci pa se ustavijo.
Done at Brussels, 18 March 2014.
V Bruslju, 18. marca 2014
On 23 March 2006, the Commission had already adopted Regulation (EC) No 553/2006 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam (OJ L 98, 6.4.2006, p. 3).
Komisija je že 23. marca 2006 sprejela Uredbo (ES) št. 553/2006 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Vietnama (UL L 98, 6.4.2006, str. 3).
Subsequently to the adoption of the contested Regulation, the measures were extended to imports consigned from the Macao Special Administrative Region by Council Regulation (EC) No 388/2008 of 29 April 2008 extending the definitive anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not (OJ L 117, 1.5.2008, p. 1).
Po sprejetju izpodbijane uredbe so bili ukrepi razširjeni še na uvoz izdelkov, poslanih iz Posebne upravne regije Macao, in sicer z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 388/2008 z dne 29. aprila 2008 o razširitvi dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 1472/2006 na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega iz Posebne upravne regije Macao, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Posebne upravne regije Macao ali ne (UL L 117, 1.5.2008, str. 1).
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and originating in the People’s Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (OJ L 352, 30.12.2009, p. 1).
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1294/2009 z dne 22. decembra 2009 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz Vietnama in s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, kakor je bila razširjena na uvoz določene obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja, poslane iz Posebne upravne regije Macao, ne glede na to, ali je deklarirana kot izdelek s poreklom iz Posebne upravne regije Macao ali ne, na osnovi pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepov na podlagi člena 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 (UL L 352, 30.12.2009, str. 1).