natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to Article 29(4) of Regulation (EU) No 168/2013, the EU type-approval certificates shall be numbered in accordance with the harmonised system set out in Annex VII to this Regulation.
Potrdila o EU-homologaciji se v skladu s členom 29(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 168/2013 oštevilčijo po usklajenem sistemu iz Priloge VII k tej uredbi.
Template for the test results sheet
Predloga obrazca rezultatov preskusa
Approval authorities shall issue the test results sheet referred to in Article 30(3) of Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 on the basis of the template set out in Annex VIII to this Regulation.
Homologacijski organi izdajo obrazec rezultatov preskusa iz člena 30(3) Uredbe (EU) št. 168/2013 na podlagi predloge iz Priloge VIII k tej uredbi.
Format of test reports
Oblika poročil o preskusu
The format of the test reports referred to in Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 shall comply with the general requirements set out in Annex VIII to this Regulation.
Oblika poročil o preskusu iz člena 32(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 168/2013 je v skladu s splošnimi zahtevami iz Priloge VIII k tej uredbi.
List of parts or equipment which may pose a serious risk to the correct functioning of essential systems
Seznam delov ali opreme, ki lahko pomenijo resno tveganje za pravilno delovanje bistvenih sistemov
The list of parts or equipment which may pose a serious risk to the correct functioning of systems that are essential for the safety of the vehicle or for its environmental performance referred to in Article 50(2) of Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 is set out in Annex X to this Regulation.
Seznam delov ali opreme, ki lahko pomenijo resno tveganje za pravilno delovanje sistemov, ključnih za varnost vozila ali njegove okoljske značilnosti, iz člena 50(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 168/2013, je določen v Prilogi X k tej uredbi.
Template and numbering system for the certificate for the placing on the market and entry into service of parts or equipment which may pose a serious risk to the correct functioning of essential systems
Predloga in sistem številčenja potrdila za dajanje na trg ter začetek uporabe delov ali opreme, ki lahko pomenijo resno tveganje za pravilno delovanje bistvenih sistemov
Approval authorities shall issue the certificate for the placing on the market and entry into service of parts or equipment which may pose a serious risk to the correct functioning of systems that are essential for the safety of the vehicle or for its environmental performance referred to in Article 51(2) of Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 on the basis of the template and in accordance with the numbering system set out in Annex IX to this Regulation.
Homologacijski organi izdajo potrdilo o soglasju za dajanje na trg in začetek uporabe delov ali opreme, ki lahko pomenijo resno tveganje za pravilno delovanje sistemov, ključnih za varnost vozila ali njegove okoljske značilnosti iz člena 51(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 168/2013 na podlagi predloge in v skladu s sistemom številčenja iz Priloge IX k tej uredbi.
It shall apply from 1 January 2016.
Uporabljati se začne 1. januarja 2016.
OJ L 60, 2.3.2013, p.
UL L 60, 2.3.2013, str.
Directive 2002/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 March 2002 relating to the type-approval of two or three-wheel motor vehicles and repealing Council Directive 92/61/EEC (OJ L 124, 9.5.2002, p.
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/24/ES z dne 18. marca 2002 o homologaciji dvo- in trikolesnih motornih vozil in o razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 92/61/EGS (UL L 124, 9.5.2002, str.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 3/2014 of 24 October 2013 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 168/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to vehicle functional safety requirements for the approval of two- or three-wheel vehicles and quadricycles (OJ L 7, 10.1.2014, p.
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 3/2014 z dne 24. oktobra 2013 o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 168/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z zahtevami glede funkcionalne varnosti vozil za homologacijo dvo- ali trikolesnih vozil in štirikolesnikov (UL L 7, 10.1.2014, str.
Annex Title
Naslov priloge
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 902/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 902/2014
of 19 August 2014
z dne 19. avgusta 2014
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1415/2004 as regards the adaptation for the United Kingdom of the maximum annual fishing effort in certain fishing areas
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1415/2004 zaradi prilagoditve največje dovoljene letne količine ribolovnega napora za nekatera ribolovna območja za Združeno kraljestvo
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1954/2003 of 4 November 2003 on the management of the fishing effort relating to certain Community fishing areas and resources [1], and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1954/2003 z dne 4. novembra 2003 o upravljanju ribolovnega napora v zvezi z nekaterimi ribolovnimi območji in viri Skupnosti [1] ter zlasti člena 12(1) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 1954/2003 provides for the adoption of a Regulation fixing the maximum annual fishing effort for each Member State and for each area and fishery defined in Articles 3 and 6 of that Regulation.
Uredba (ES) št. 1954/2003 predvideva sprejetje uredbe za določitev največje dovoljene letne količine ribolovnega napora za vsako državo članico in za vsako območje ter vrsto ribištva, kot je opredeljeno v členih 3 in 6 navedene uredbe.
Accordingly, Council Regulation (EC) No 1415/2004 [2] established the maximum annual fishing effort for those fishing areas and fisheries.
V skladu s tem je Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1415/2004 [2] določila največjo dovoljeno letno količino ribolovnega napora za navedena ribolovna območja in vrste ribištva.
According to Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1954/2003 the Commission may, upon request of a Member State, shift the fishing effort between areas or divisions in order to allow the Member State to fully take up its fishing possibilities.
V skladu s členom 12(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1954/2003 lahko Komisija na zahtevo države članice premesti ribolovni napor med območji ali razdelki in tako omogoči državi članici, da v celoti izkoristi svoje možnosti ribolova.
On 2 June 2014, the United Kingdom requested the Commission to transfer 30000 kW days from ICES area VII to ICES area VIII.
Združeno kraljestvo je 2. junija 2014 Komisijo zaprosilo za prenos 30000 kW dni iz območja ICES VII v območje ICES VIII.
On 16 June 2014, the United Kingdom submitted additional information on the utilisation of quotas and the operation of vessels in ICES area VIII.
Dne 16. junija 2014 je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo dodatne informacije o uporabi kvot in obratovanju plovil v območju ICES VIII.
The information provided by the United Kingdom warrants the requested shift of fishing effort between the areas concerned.
Informacije, ki jih je predložilo Združeno kraljestvo, upravičujejo zaprošeno premestitev ribolovnega napora med zadevnima območjema.
Regulation (EC) No 1415/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1415/2004 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1415/2004
Sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 1415/2004
In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1415/2004, the column regarding maximum annual fishing effort for demersal species for the United Kingdom in Table A ‘Demersal species excluding those covered by Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002’, is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1415/2004 se stolpec v zvezi z največjo dovoljeno letno količino ribolovnega napora za Združeno kraljestvo v tabeli A „Pridnene vrste razen tistih, ki so zajete v Uredbi (ES) št. 2347/2002“ spremeni:
Done at Brussels, 19 August 2014.
V Bruslju, 19. avgusta 2014
OJ L 289, 7.11.2003, p. 1.
UL L 289, 7.11.2003, str. 1.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1415/2004 of 19 July 2004 fixing the maximum annual fishing effort for certain fishing areas and fisheries (OJ L 258, 5.8.2004, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1415/2004 z dne 19. julija 2004 o določitvi največje dovoljene letne količine ribolovnega napora za nekatera ribolovna območja in vrste ribištva (UL L 258, 5.8.2004, str. 1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 903/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 903/2014
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 904/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 904/2014
of 20 August 2014
z dne 20. avgusta 2014
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of monosodium glutamate originating in Indonesia
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz mononatrijevega glutamata s poreklom iz Indonezije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1], and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], in zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
After consulting the Member States,
po posvetovanju z državami članicami,
On 29 November 2013, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) initiated an anti-dumping investigation with regard to imports into the Union of monosodium glutamate originating in Indonesia (‘the country concerned’).
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 29. novembra 2013 začela protidampinško preiskavo v zvezi z uvozom mononatrijevega glutamata s poreklom iz Indonezije („zadevna država“) v Unijo.
It published a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘the Notice of Initiation’).
V Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] je objavila obvestilo o začetku („obvestilo o začetku“).
On the same date, the Commission announced the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (‘the basic Regulation’) concerning definitive anti-dumping measures in force on imports of monosodium glutamate originating in the People's Republic of China (‘China’), by a Notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
Istega dne je Komisija z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 („osnovna uredba“) napovedala začetek pregleda zaradi izteka veljavnih dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz mononatrijevega glutamata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („Kitajska“).
The Commission initiated the investigation following a complaint lodged on 16 October 2013 by Ajinomoto Foods Europe SAS (‘the complainant’) the sole Union producer of monosodium glutamate, thus representing 100 % of the total Union production of monosodium glutamate.
Komisija je preiskavo začela na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 16. oktobra 2013 vložila družba Ajinomoto Foods Europe SAS („pritožnik“), ki je edini proizvajalec mononatrijevega glutamata v Uniji in zato predstavlja 100 % celotne proizvodnje mononatrijevega glutamata v Uniji.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of dumping and of resulting material injury that was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of the investigation.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o dampingu in znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za utemeljitev začetka preiskave.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission invited all interested parties to contact it in order to participate in the investigation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku vse zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj se ji javijo, če so pripravljene sodelovati v preiskavi.
In addition, the Commission officially advised the complainant, the known exporting producers and the Indonesian authorities, known importers, suppliers, users and traders known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate.
Poleg tega je o začetku preiskave uradno obvestila pritožnika, znane proizvajalce izvoznike, indonezijske organe, znane uvoznike, dobavitelje, uporabnike in trgovce, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter jih pozvala k sodelovanju.
Interested parties were given an opportunity to comment on the initiation of the investigation and to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer for Directorate-General (‘DG’) for Trade.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da predložijo pripombe glede začetka preiskave in zaprosijo za zaslišanje pred Komisijo in/ali pooblaščencem za zaslišanje za Generalni direktorat („GD“) za trgovino.
Interested parties were also given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and request a hearing within the time limit set in the Notice of Initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele tudi možnost, da pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
In view of the large number of exporting producers in the country concerned and unrelated importers involved in the investigation and in order to complete the investigation in the statutory time limits, the Commission announced in the Notice of Initiation that it had decided to limit to a reasonable number the exporting producers and unrelated importers that would be investigated by selecting a sample in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation (this process is also referred to as ‘sampling’).
Zaradi velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov v zadevni državi in nepovezanih uvoznikov, vključenih v preiskavo, in da bi se preiskava zaključila v predpisanih rokih, je Komisija v obvestilu o začetku napovedala, da bo izbrala vzorec v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe in tako smiselno omejila število proizvajalcev izvoznikov in nepovezanih uvoznikov, ki jih bo preiskala (postopek se imenuje „vzorčenje“).
To decide whether sampling is necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission requested all unrelated importers to make themselves known and to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je vse nepovezane uvoznike pozvala, naj se ji javijo in predložijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
Fourteen unrelated importers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Štirinajst nepovezanih uvoznikov je predložilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected a sample of three on the basis of the largest volume of imports into the Union and their geographic location in the Union.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec treh uvoznikov na podlagi največjega obsega uvoza v Unijo in njihove geografske lege v Uniji.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, all known importers concerned were consulted on the selection of the sample.
V skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe so bila z vsemi znanimi zadevnimi uvozniki opravljena posvetovanja o izbiri vzorca.
No comments were made.
Pripomb ni bilo.
Subsequently, only one of the three companies selected in the sample cooperated by submitting a questionnaire reply.
Samo ena od treh družb, vključenih v vzorec, je pozneje sodelovala in predložila izpolnjen vprašalnik.
To decide whether sampling is necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission requested all exporting producers in Indonesia to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, je vse proizvajalce izvoznike v Indoneziji pozvala, naj se ji javijo in predložijo informacije, določene v obvestilu o začetku.
Four exporting producers in the country concerned provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Štirje proizvajalci izvozniki v zadevni državi so predložili zahtevane informacije in se strinjali z vključitvijo v vzorec.
In view of the low number of exporting producers, the Commission decided that sampling was not necessary.
Zaradi majhnega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov se je Komisija odločila, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.
Replies to the questionnaire and cooperation
Izpolnjeni vprašalniki in sodelovanje
The Commission sent questionnaires to the sole Union producer, the four sampled exporting producers, the three sampled unrelated importers and thirty-three identified users in the Union.
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala edinemu proizvajalcu v Uniji, štirim vzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, trem vzorčenim nepovezanim uvoznikom in triintridesetim opredeljenim uporabnikom v Uniji.
Questionnaire replies were received from the sole Union producer, from one of the three sampled unrelated importers, from one trader, from three out of four known exporting producers and from five users.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so poslali edini proizvajalec v Uniji, eden od treh vzorčenih nepovezanih uvoznikov, eden od trgovcev, trije od štirih znanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in pet uporabnikov.
The investigation revealed that the non-cooperating sampled exporting producer was related to another sampled exporting producer who was cooperating by submitting a questionnaire reply.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bil nesodelujoči vzorčeni proizvajalec izvoznik povezan z drugim vzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki je sodeloval in predložil izpolnjen vprašalnik.
The cooperating exporting producer mentioned in recital 15 claimed that it should not be considered as related to the non-cooperating exporting producer as neither of the companies had any influence in the other's decision making.
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik iz uvodne izjave 15 je trdil, da se ne bi smel šteti za povezanega z nesodelujočim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, saj nobeden od njiju nima vpliva na odločanje drugega.
Moreover, the cooperating exporting producer claimed that it could not force the non-cooperating one to reply to the questionnaire.
Poleg tega je trdil, da nesodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika ni mogel prisiliti, da izpolni vprašalnik.
The investigation found that both companies were owned by the same shareholders.
Preiskava je pokazala, da sta obe družbi v lasti istih delničarjev.
Therefore they were considered as related within the meaning of Article 143(1)(d) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 [4] concerning the implementation of the Community Customs Code (‘Customs Code’).
Zato sta se šteli za povezani v smislu člena 143(1)(d) Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 [4] o izvajanju carinskega zakonika Skupnosti („carinski zakonik“).
A third cooperating exporting producer claimed that there was another producer of the product concerned in Indonesia, who was part of the group mentioned in recital 16 but who did not make itself known.
Tretji sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je v Indoneziji še en proizvajalec zadevnega izdelka, ki je član skupine iz uvodne izjave 16, vendar se ni javil.
Although such a producer indeed exists, the investigation found no evidence based on Eurostat data and other available sources that this producer exported to the Union during the period considered.
Čeprav ta proizvajalec res obstaja, med preiskavo na podlagi podatkov Eurostata in drugih razpoložljivih virov ni bilo odkritih nobenih dokazov, da je ta proizvajalec v obravnavanem obdobju izvažal v Unijo.
Therefore, this company was not requested to make itself known or to provide the information asked for in the questionnaires intended for exporting producers.
Zato se od te družbe ni zahtevalo, naj se javi ali predloži zahtevane informacije v izpolnjenem vprašalniku za proizvajalce izvoznike.
Moreover, as described in recital 48, for all producers in the country concerned that did not cooperate a residual duty rate was established.
Poleg tega je bila za vse proizvajalce v zadevni državi, ki niso sodelovali, določena stopnja preostale dajatve, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 48.
This residual duty is based on Article 18 of the basic Regulation and is applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Ta preostala dajatev temelji na členu 18 osnovne uredbe in se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Ajinomoto Foods Europe SAS, Mesnil-Saint-Nicaise, France
Ajinomoto Foods Europe SAS, Mesnil-Saint-Nicaise, Francija,
Falken Trade, Olsztyn, Poland
Falken Trade, Olsztyn, Poljska,
AkzoNobel, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
AkzoNobel, Amersfoort, Nizozemska,
Unilever, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Unilever, Rotterdam, Nizozemska,
Miwon Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Miwon Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonezija,
Cheil Jedang Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Cheil Jedang Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonezija,
Related importers in the Union
Povezani uvozniki v Uniji
CJ Europe GmbH, Schwalbach, Germany
CJ Europe GmbH, Schwalbach, Nemčija,
Amstelveen, the Netherlands
Amstelveen, Nizozemska,
Related trader in Hong Kong
Povezani trgovec v Hongkongu
CJ China Limited, Hong Kong
CJ China Limited, Hongkong.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 October 2012 to 30 September 2013 (‘the investigation period’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajemala obdobje od 1. oktobra 2012 do 30. septembra 2013 („obdobje preiskave“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 April 2010 to the end of the investigation period (‘the period considered’) [5].
Gibanja, pomembna za oceno škode, so se proučila za obdobje od 1. aprila 2010 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“) [5].
The product concerned is monosodium glutamate (‘MSG’) originating in Indonesia, currently falling within CN code ex29224200 (‘the product concerned’).
Zadevni izdelek je mononatrijev glutamat („MNG“) s poreklom iz Indonezije, ki je trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN ex29224200 („zadevni izdelek“).
MSG is a food additive and mainly used as a flavour enhancer in soups, broths, fish and meat dishes, spice blends and ready-made foods.
MNG je aditiv za živila in se uporablja predvsem kot ojačevalec okusa v juhah, mesnih juhah, ribjih in mesnih jedeh, mešanicah začimb ter pripravljeni hrani.
It is produced in the form of white, odourless crystals of various sizes.
Proizvaja se v obliki različno velikih belih kristalov brez vonja.
MSG is also used in the chemical industry for non-food applications such as detergents.
MNG se uporablja tudi v kemični industriji za neprehrambene izdelke, kot so detergenti.
It is mainly produced by fermentation of various sugar sources (corn starch, tapioca starch, sugar syrup, sugar cane molasses and sugar beet molasses).
Proizvaja se predvsem s fermentacijo različnih virov sladkorja (koruzni škrob, škrob tapioke, sladkorni sirup, melasa iz sladkornega trsa in melasa iz sladkorne pese).
The investigation showed that the product concerned, the product produced and sold on the domestic market of Indonesia and the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry have the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics as well as the same basic uses.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo zadevni izdelek, izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu Indonezije, ter izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije, enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter enake osnovne uporabe.
One interested party claimed that there was a significant difference in quality between the MSG produced in Indonesia and the MSG produced in the Union.
Ena od zainteresiranih strani je trdila, da je med MNG, proizvedenem v Indoneziji, in MNG, proizvedenem v Uniji, velika razlika v kakovosti.
It was claimed that due to this quality difference MSG produced and sold by the Union industry in the Union market and MSG imported from Indonesia werenot interchangeable and should therefore not be considered as being alike.
Trdilo se je, da MNG, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije, ter MNG, ki se uvaža iz Indonezije, zaradi te razlike v kakovosti nistazamenljiva in se zato ne bi smela obravnavati kot podobna izdelka.
This claim remained unsubstantiated and was contrary to the findings of the investigation, which revealed no difference in quality between the MSG produced in Indonesia and the MSG produced in the Union.
Ta trditev se ni utemeljila in je v nasprotju z ugotovitvami preiskave, ki ni pokazala nobenih razlik v kakovosti med MNG iz Indonezije in MNG iz Unije.