natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The innovation partnership should be based on the procedural rules that apply to negotiated procedures with prior call for competition and contracts should be awarded on the sole basis of the best price-quality ratio, which is most suitable for comparing tenders for innovative solutions.
Partnerstvo za inovacije bi moralo temeljiti na postopkovnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za postopke s pogajanji s predhodnim javnim razpisom, javna naročila pa bi se morala oddati le na podlagi najboljšega razmerja med ceno in kakovostjo, kar je najprimernejše za primerjavo ponudb za inovativne rešitve.
Whether in respect of very large projects or smaller innovative projects, the innovation partnership should be structured in such a way that it can provide the necessary ‘market-pull’ incentivising the development of an innovative solution without foreclosing the market.
Partnerstvo za inovacije bi moralo biti tako pri zelo velikih kot pri manjših inovativnih projektih strukturirano tako, da bi lahko zagotovilo potrebno „povpraševanje trga“, ki bi spodbudilo razvoj inovativne rešitve brez zapiranja trga.
Contracting entities should therefore not use innovation partnerships in such a way as to prevent, restrict or distort competition.
Naročniki zato ne bi smeli uporabljati partnerstev za inovacije tako, da bi preprečevali, omejevali ali izkrivljali konkurenco.
Experience has shown that the competitive dialogue, which is provided for under Directive 2014/24/EU, has been of use in cases where contracting authorities are unable to define the means of satisfying their needs or of assessing what the market can offer in terms of technical, financial or legal solutions.
Iz izkušenj je razvidno, da je konkurenčni dialog iz Direktive 2014/24/EU uporaben v primerih, pri katerih javni naročniki ne morejo opredeliti sredstev za zadovoljitev svojih potreb ali presoditi, kaj lahko ponudi trg v smislu tehničnih, finančnih ali pravnih rešitev.
This situation may arise in particular with innovative projects, the implementation of major integrated transport infrastructure projects, large computer networks or projects involving complex and structured financing.
To se lahko zgodi zlasti pri inovativnih projektih, izvajanju pomembnih projektov na področju integrirane prometne infrastrukture, projektov za velika računalniška omrežja ali projektov, ki vključujejo kompleksno in strukturirano financiranje.
Member States should therefore be allowed to place this tool at the disposal of contracting entities.
Državam članicam bi torej morali dovoliti, da dajo to orodje na razpolago naročnikom.
Where relevant, contracting authorities should be encouraged to appoint a project leader to ensure good cooperation between the economic operators and the contracting authority during the award procedure.
Javne naročnike bi bilo treba po potrebi spodbujati k imenovanju vodje projekta, ki bi zagotavljal dobro sodelovanje med gospodarskimi subjekti in javnim naročnikom v postopku oddaje javnega naročila.
In view of the detrimental effects on competition, negotiated procedures without a prior call for competition should be used only in very exceptional circumstances.
Zaradi škodljivih učinkov na konkurenco bi se morali postopki s pogajanji brez predhodnega javnega razpisa uporabljati samo v zelo izjemnih okoliščinah.
This exception should be limited to cases where publication is either not possible, for reasons of extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable for and not attributable to the contracting entity, or where it is clear from the outset that publication would not trigger more competition or better procurement outcomes, not least because there is objectively only one economic operator that can perform the contract.
Ta izjema bi morala biti omejena na primere, v katerih objava ni mogoča zaradi skrajne nujnosti, nastale kot posledica dogodkov, ki jih naročnik ni mogel predvideti in mu zanje ni mogoče pripisati odgovornosti, ali v katerih je že na samem začetku jasno, da objava ne bo spodbudila konkurence ali boljših rezultatov javnega naročanja, ne nazadnje zato, ker objektivno obstaja le en gospodarski subjekt, ki lahko izvede javno naročilo.
Exclusivity can also arise from other reasons, but only situations of objective exclusivity can justify the use of the negotiated procedure without a prior call for competition, where the situation of exclusivity has not been created by the contracting entity itself with a view to the future procurement procedure.
Za ekskluzivnost so lahko tudi drugi razlogi, a uporabo postopka s pogajanji brez predhodnega javnega razpisa lahko upraviči le objektivna ekskluzivnost, če ekskluzivnosti ni ustvaril sam naročnik zaradi prihodnjega postopka javnega naročanja.
Contracting entities relying on this exception should provide reasons why there are no reasonable alternatives or substitutes such as using alternative distribution channels including outside the Member State of the contracting entity or considering functionally comparable works, supplies and services.
Naročniki, ki se sklicujejo na to izjemo, bi morali navesti, zakaj ni razumnih alternativ ali nadomestil, kot na primer uporaba alternativnih distribucijskih kanalov, tudi zunaj države članice naročnika, ali razmislek o funkcionalno primerljivih gradnjah, blagu in storitvah.
Technical reasons may also derive from specific interoperability requirements which must be fulfilled in order to ensure the functioning of the works, supplies or services to be procured.
Tehnični razlogi lahko izvirajo tudi iz posebnih zahtev glede interoperabilnosti, ki jih je treba izpolniti, da se zagotovi delovanje gradenj, blaga ali storitev, ki so predmet naročila.
Finally, a procurement procedure is not useful where supplies are purchased directly on a commodity market, including trading platforms for commodities such as agricultural products, raw materials and energy exchanges, where the regulated and supervised multilateral trading structure naturally guarantees market prices.
Postopek javnega naročanja ni uporaben, če se blago nabavi neposredno na blagovni borzi, vključno s tržnimi platformami za blago, kot so kmetijsko blago in surovine, ter energetskimi borzami, na katerih regulirana in nadzorovana večstranska struktura trgovanja že po naravi zagotavlja tržne cene.
It should be clarified that the provisions concerning protection of confidential information do not in any way prevent public disclosure of non-confidential parts of concluded contracts, including any subsequent changes.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da določbe v zvezi z varovanjem zaupnosti informacij nikakor ne preprečujejo javnega razkritja nezaupnih delov sklenjenih pogodb o izvedbi javnega naročila niti njihovih nadaljnjih sprememb.
Electronic means of information and communication can greatly simplify the publication of contracts and increase the efficiency and transparency of procurement processes.
Z elektronskimi informacijskimi in komunikacijskimi sredstvi se lahko zelo poenostavi objava naročil ter povečata učinkovitost in transparentnost postopkov javnega naročanja.
They should become the standard means of communication and information exchange in procurement procedures, as they greatly enhance the possibilities of economic operators to participate in procurement procedures across the internal market.
Ta sredstva bi morala postati standardna sredstva sporočanja in izmenjave informacij v postopkih javnega naročanja, saj znatno povečujejo možnosti gospodarskih subjektov za sodelovanje v postopkih naročanja na celotnem notranjem trgu.
For that purpose, transmission of notices in electronic form, electronic availability of the procurement documents and – after a transition period of 30 months – fully electronic communication, meaning communication by electronic means at all stages of the procedure, including the transmission of requests for participation and, in particular, the transmission of the tenders (electronic submission) should be made mandatory.
V ta namen bi moralo postati obvezno naslednje: pošiljanje obvestil v elektronski obliki, dostopnost dokumentacije v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila v elektronski obliki in – po prehodnem obdobju 30 mesecev – popolnoma elektronska komunikacija, to je komunikacija z elektronskimi sredstvi v vseh fazah postopka, vključno s pošiljanjem prijav za sodelovanje in zlasti pošiljanjem ponudb (elektronska predložitev ponudb).
Member States and contracting entities should remain free to go further if they so wish.
Državam članicam in naročnikom bi morali dovoliti, da na tem področju naredijo še več, če želijo.
It should also be clarified that mandatory use of electronic means of communications pursuant to this Directive should not, however, oblige contracting entities to carry out electronic processing of tenders, nor should it mandate electronic evaluation or automatic processing.
Prav tako bi bilo treba pojasniti, da obvezna uporaba elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev v skladu s to direktivo naročnikom ne bi smela predpisovati elektronske obdelave ponudb niti ne bi smela nalagati elektronskega ocenjevanja ali avtomatske obdelave.
Furthermore, pursuant to this Directive, no elements of the public procurement process after the award of the contract should be covered by the obligation to use electronic means of communication, nor should internal communication within the contracting entity.
V skladu s to direktivo pa obvezna uporaba elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev ne bi smela zadevati nobenih delov postopka javnega naročanja po oddaji javnega naročila niti notranje komunikacije pri naročniku.
Contracting entities should, except in certain specific situations, use electronic means of communication which are non-discriminatory, generally available and interoperable with the information and communication technology (ICT) products in general use and which do not restrict economic operators’ access to the procurement procedure.
Naročniki bi morali – razen v nekaterih posebnih primerih – uporabljati elektronska komunikacijska sredstva, ki so nediskriminatorna, splošno dostopna in interoperabilna s proizvodi informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije (IKT) v splošni rabi ter gospodarskim subjektom ne omejujejo dostopa do postopka javnega naročanja.
It should be clarified that the obligation to use electronic means at all stages of the procurement procedure would be appropriate neither where the use of electronic means would require specialised tools or file formats that are not generally available nor where the communications concerned could only be handled using specialised office equipment.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da obvezna uporaba elektronskih sredstev v vseh fazah postopka javnega naročanja ne bi bila ustrezna, niti če bi bila za to potrebna posebna orodja ali oblike datotek, ki niso splošno razpoložljive, niti če bi bila obdelava zadevnih sporočil možna samo z uporabo specializirane pisarniške opreme.
Contracting entities should therefore not be obliged to require the use of electronic means of communication in the submission process in certain cases, which should be listed exhaustively.
Naročniki zato v nekaterih primerih, ki bi jih bilo treba izčrpno navesti, ne bi smeli biti primorani zahtevati uporabe elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev v postopku predložitve ponudb.
This Directive stipulates that such cases should include situations which would require the use of specialised office equipment not generally available to the contracting entities such as wide-format printers.
Ta direktiva določa, da bi morali sem spadati tudi primeri, v katerih bi bila potrebna uporaba specializirane pisarniške opreme, ki naročnikom ni splošno dostopna, na primer tiskalniki širokega formata.
In some procurement procedures the procurement documents might require the submission of a physical or scale model which cannot be submitted to the contracting entities using electronic means.
V nekaterih postopkih javnega naročanja je lahko v dokumentaciji v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila navedena zahteva za predložitev fizičnega modela ali makete, ki je naročniku ni mogoče predložiti z uporabo elektronskih sredstev.
In such situations, the model should be transmitted to the contracting entities by post or other suitable carrier.
V takih primerih bi bilo treba model naročniku poslati po pošti ali drugi primerni kurirski službi.
It is appropriate to clarify that, where necessary for technical reasons, contracting entities should be able to set a maximum limit to the size of the files that may be submitted.
Primerno je pojasniti, da bi morali naročniki imeti možnost, da določijo največjo velikost datotek, ki se lahko predložijo, kadar je to potrebno zaradi tehničnih razlogov.
There can be exceptional cases in which contracting entities should be allowed not to use electronic means of communication where not using such means of communication is necessary in order to protect the particularly sensitive nature of information.
V nekaterih izjemnih primerih bi naročnikom morali dovoliti, da ne uporabljajo elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev, če bi bilo to potrebno zaradi varstva posebej občutljivih informacij.
Such might for instance be the case where contracting entities require the use of dedicated secure means of communication to which they offer access.
Tak primer je lahko denimo, kadar naročniki zahtevajo, da se uporabljajo posebna varna komunikacijska sredstva, do katerih nudijo dostop.
For example, in order to participate in a procurement procedure in which use of electronic catalogues, which is a format for the presentation and organisation of information in a manner that is common to all the participating bidders and which lends itself to electronic treatment, is permitted or required, economic operators would, in the absence of standardisation, be required to customise their own catalogues to each procurement procedure, which would entail providing very similar information in different formats depending on the specifications of the contracting entities concerned.
Za sodelovanje v postopku javnega naročanja, pri katerem se dovoli ali zahteva uporaba elektronskih katalogov, to je formata za predstavitev in razvrstitev informacij na način, ki je skupen vsem sodelujočim ponudnikom in ustrezen za elektronsko uporabo, bi na primer moral gospodarski subjekt zaradi odsotnosti standardizacije svoje kataloge prilagoditi posameznemu postopku javnega naročanja, kar pomeni, da bi moral zagotoviti zelo podobne informacije v različnih formatih glede na specifikacije zadevnega naročnika.
It should also consider the extent to which a given standard has already been used in practice by economic operators and contracting entities and how well it has worked.
Preučiti bi morala tudi, do katere mere gospodarski subjekti in naročniki v praksi že uporabljajo določen standard ter kako uspešna je ta uporaba.
Before making the use of any particular standard mandatory, the Commission should also carefully consider the costs that this might entail, in particular in terms of adaptations to existing e-procurement solutions, including infrastructure, processes or software.
Komisija bi morala pred določitvijo obvezne uporabe kakršnega koli določenega standarda tudi pazljivo preučiti morebitne s tem povezane stroške, zlasti glede prilagoditev veljavnih rešitev pri elektronskem javnem naročanju, vključno z infrastrukturo, postopki ali programsko opremo.
Where the standards concerned are not developed by an international, European or national standardisation organisation, they should meet the requirements applicable to ICT standards as set out in Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [20].(68) Before specifying the level of security required for the electronic means of communications to be used at the various stages of the award procedure, Member States and contracting entities should evaluate the proportionality between on the one hand the requirements aimed at ensuring correct and reliable identification of the senders of the communication concerned as well as the integrity of its content and on the other hand the risk of problems such as in situations where messages are sent by a different sender than that indicated.
Če zadevnih standardov ne razvije mednarodna, evropska ali nacionalna organizacija za standardizacijo, bi standardi morali izpolnjevati zahteve, ki veljajo za standarde na področju informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije, določene v Uredbi (EU) št. 1025/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [20].(68) Pred določitvijo stopnje varnosti, zahtevane za elektronska komunikacijska sredstva, ki bodo uporabljena v različnih fazah postopka oddaje javnega naročila, bi morali države članice in naročniki oceniti sorazmernost med zahtevami za zagotavljanje pravilne in zanesljive identifikacije pošiljateljev zadevnega sporočila ter njegove celotne vsebine na eni strani in nevarnostjo težav na drugi strani, denimo v primeru, da sporočilo pošlje pošiljatelj, ki ni navedeni pošiljatelj.
All other things being equal, this would mean that the level of security required of, for instance, an e-mail requesting confirmation of the exact address at which an information meeting will be held would not need to be set at the same level as for the tender itself which constitutes a binding offer for the economic operator.
Če vse ostane nespremenjeno, bi to pomenilo, da za stopnjo varnosti, ki se zahteva na primer za elektronsko pošto s prošnjo za potrditev natančnega naslova, na katerem bo potekal informativni sestanek, ne bi bilo treba, da je enako visoka kot pri sami ponudbi, ki je za gospodarski subjekt zavezujoča.
While essential elements of a procurement procedure such as the procurement documents, requests for participation, confirmation of interest and tenders should always be made in writing, oral communication with economic operators should otherwise continue to be possible, provided that its content is documented to a sufficient degree.
Medtem ko bi morali biti bistveni deli postopka javnega naročanja, na primer dokumentacija v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila, prijave za sodelovanje, potrditve interesa in ponudbe, zmeraj v pisni obliki, pa bi še vedno morala biti možna ustna komunikacija z gospodarskimi subjekti, če se njena vsebina do zadostne mere dokumentira.
This is necessary to ensure an adequate level of transparency that allows for a verification of whether the principle of equal treatment has been adhered to.
To je nujno za zagotavljanje ustrezne ravni transparentnosti, ki omogoča, da se preveri upoštevanje načela enake obravnave.
There is a strong trend emerging across Union public procurement markets towards the aggregation of demand by public purchasers, with a view to obtaining economies of scale, including lower prices and transaction costs, and to improving and professionalising procurement management.
Na trgih javnega naročanja v Uniji se pojavlja močna težnja po združevanju povpraševanja javnih naročnikov z namenom doseganja ekonomije obsega, vključno z nižjimi cenami in transakcijskimi stroški, ter izboljšanja in profesionalizacije vodenja postopkov javnega naročanja.
This can be achieved by concentrating purchases either by the number of contracting entities involved or by volume and value over time.
To se lahko doseže z združevanjem naročil večjega števila zadevnih naročnikov ali pa z združevanjem javnih naročil v smislu obsega in vrednosti javnih naročil v daljšem obdobju.
However, the aggregation and centralisation of purchases should be carefully monitored in order to avoid excessive concentration of purchasing power and collusion, and to preserve transparency and competition, as well as market access opportunities for SMEs.
Vendar bi bilo treba združevanje in centralizacijo javnih naročil skrbno spremljati, da se preprečita čezmerna koncentracija kupne moči in nedovoljeno dogovarjanje ter da se ohranijo transparentnost, konkurenca in možnosti MSP za dostop do trga.
Recourse to framework agreements can be an efficient procurement technique throughout the Union; however, there is a need to enhance competition by improving the transparency of and access to procurement carried out by means of framework agreements.
Uporaba okvirnih sporazumov je lahko učinkovita tehnika javnega naročanja po vsej Uniji; vendar je treba povečati konkurenco, in sicer z izboljšanjem transparentnosti javnega naročanja, ki se izvaja z okvirnimi sporazumi, in dostopa do njega.
It is therefore appropriate to revise the provisions applicable to those agreements, in particular by providing that the award of specific contracts based on such agreements take place on the basis of objective rules and criteria, for instance following a mini-competition, and by limiting the duration of framework agreements.
Zato je primerno, da se pregledajo določbe, ki se uporabljajo za te sporazume, predvsem da se oddaja posameznih, na sporazumu temelječih naročil določi na podlagi objektivnih pravil in kriterijev, na primer prek manjšega razpisa, in se omeji trajanje okvirnih sporazumov.
It should also be clarified, that while contracts based on a framework agreement are to be awarded before the end of the term of the framework agreement itself, the duration of the individual contracts based on a framework agreement does not need to coincide with the duration of that framework agreement, but might, as appropriate, be shorter or longer.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba tudi, da se morajo naročila na podlagi okvirnega sporazuma sicer oddati pred koncem veljavnosti samega okvirnega sporazuma, ni pa potrebno, da bi bilo trajanje posameznega naročila, ki temelji na okvirnem sporazumu, enako trajanju navedenega okvirnega sporazuma, saj je po potrebi lahko krajše ali daljše.
In particular, it should be allowed to set the length of individual contracts based on a framework agreement taking account of factors such as the time needed for their performance; where maintenance of equipment with an expected useful life of more than eight years is included or where extensive training of staff to perform the contract is needed.
Treba bi bilo zlasti omogočiti, da se pri določanju trajanja posameznih naročil, ki temeljijo na okvirnem sporazumu, upoštevajo dejavniki, kot so čas, potreben za njihovo izvedbo, predvideno vzdrževanje opreme s pričakovano življenjsko dobo več kot osmih let ali obsežno usposabljanje osebja, potrebno za izvedbo naročila.
It should also be clarified that there might be cases in which the length of the framework agreements themselves should be allowed to be longer than eight years.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba tudi, da lahko obstajajo primeri, v katerih bi bilo treba dovoliti, da trajanje samih okvirnih sporazumov preseže osem let.
Such cases, which should be duly justified, in particular by the subject of the framework agreement, might for instance arise where economic operators need to dispose of equipment the amortisation period of which is longer than eight years and which must be available at any time over the entire duration of the framework agreement.
Taki primeri, ki bi jih bilo treba ustrezno utemeljiti, zlasti s predmetom okvirnega sporazuma, se lahko pojavijo na primer, kadar gospodarski subjekt potrebuje opremo, katere amortizacijska doba je daljša od osmih let in ki mora biti na razpolago kadar koli v celotnem obdobju trajanja okvirnega sporazuma.
In the particular context of utilities providing essential services to the public there may be a need in certain cases for both longer framework agreements and a longer duration of individual contracts; for instance in the case of framework agreements aimed at ensuring ordinary and extraordinary maintenance of networks which may require expensive equipment to be operated by personnel having received highly specialised ad-hoc training aimed at ensuring continuation of the services and minimisation of possible disruptions.
Zlasti pri gospodarskih javnih službah, namenjenih zagotavljanju bistvenih javnih storitev, se lahko zgodi, da bo treba določiti daljše obdobje trajanja okvirnih sporazumov in daljše trajanje posameznih naročil; na primer pri okvirnih sporazumih za zagotavljanje rednih in izrednih vzdrževalnih del na omrežjih, zaradi česar bo morda potrebna draga oprema, ki jo bo uporabljalo osebje, ki se je pred tem udeležilo visoko specializiranega ad hoc usposabljanja, namenjenega zagotavljanju neprekinjenega izvajanja storitve in zmanjšanju možnih motenj.