natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As a consequence, the Commission invited the eight third countries concerned: (i) to take all necessary measures to implement the actions contained in the action plans suggested by the Commission; (ii) to assess the implementation of the actions contained in the action plans suggested by the Commission; and (iii) to send detailed reports to the Commission every six months assessing the implementation of each action as regards, inter alia, their individual and/or overall effectiveness in ensuring a fully compliant fisheries control system.
Komisija je posledično pozvala osem zadevnih tretjih držav, naj: (i) sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za izvajanje ukrepov, ki jih vsebujejo akcijski načrti, ki jih je predlagala Komisija; (ii) ocenijo izvajanje ukrepov, ki jih vsebujejo akcijski načrti, ki jih je predlagala Komisija; in (iii) Komisiji vsakih šest mesecev posredujejo podrobna poročila, v katerih je ocenjeno izvajanje posameznih ukrepov, med drugim v zvezi z njihovo individualno in/ali splošno učinkovitostjo pri zagotavljanju popolnoma skladnega sistema za nadzor ribolova.
The eight third countries concerned were given the opportunity to respond in writing to issues explicitly indicated in the Decision of 15 November 2012 as well as to other relevant information, allowing them to submit evidence in order to refute or complete the facts invoked in the Decision of 15 November 2012 or to adopt, as appropriate, a plan of action to improve and measures taken to rectify the situation.
Osmim zadevnim tretjim državam je bila dana možnost, da pisno odgovorijo na vprašanja, ki so bila izrecno navedena v sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012, ter se odzovejo na druge pomembne informacije, kar jim omogoča predložitev dokazov, s katerimi bi izpodbijale ali dopolnile dejstva, na katera se sklicujejo v sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012, ali po potrebi sprejele akcijski načrt in ukrepe za izboljšanje razmer.
The eight countries were assured of their right to ask for, or to provide, additional information.
Navedenim osmim državam je bila zagotovljena pravica, da zahtevajo dodatne informacije oziroma da se jim dodatne informacije zagotovijo.
On 15 November 2012, the Commission opened a process of dialogue with the eight third countries and highlighted that it considered a period of six months as being sufficient in principle for reaching an agreement.
Komisija je 15. novembra 2012 začela dialog z osmimi tretjimi državami in poudarila, da meni, da šest mesecev načeloma zadostuje za dosego sporazuma o tej zadevi.
The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary.
Komisija je še naprej zahtevala in preverjala vse informacije, ki jih je štela za potrebne.
The oral and written comments submitted by the eight countries following the Decision of 15 November 2012 were considered and taken into account.
Obravnavane in upoštevane so bile ustne in pisne pripombe, ki jih je po sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012 predložilo osem držav.
The eight countries were kept informed, either orally or in writing, of the Commission's deliberations.
O ugotovitvah Komisije je bilo osem držav pisno ali ustno obveščenih.
On 24 March 2014, the Council Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU [3] was adopted.
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2014/170/EU [3] je bil sprejet 24. marca 2014.
Three of the eight countries concerned by the Decision of 15 November 2012 were listed as non-cooperating third countries as they, despite taking some measures, still failed to discharge their duties under international law as flag or coastal State to take action to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing.
Tri od osmih držav, ki so bile navedene v sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012, so bile uvrščene na seznam kot nesodelujoče tretje države, saj kljub sprejetju nekaterih ukrepov še vedno niso izpolnile svojih dolžnosti sprejetja ukrepov za preprečevanje IUU ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje, ki so jim bile kot državam zastave ali obalnim državam naložene z mednarodnim pravom.
By Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU [4], the Commission identified the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (‘Sri Lanka’) as a non-cooperating third country in fighting IUU fishing.
Komisija je z Izvedbenim sklepom 2014/715/EU [4] Demokratično socialistično republiko Šrilanko (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Šrilanka) opredelila kot nesodelujočo tretjo državo v boju proti IUU ribolovu.
In accordance with the Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, the Commission provided the reasons why it considered that Sri Lanka failed to discharge its duties under international law as flag, port, coastal or market State to take action to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1005/2008 je Komisija navedla razloge, zakaj meni, da Šrilanka ni izpolnila svojih obveznosti, ki so ji bile naložene v skladu z mednarodnim pravom kot državi zastave, pristanišča, obalni državi ali državi trga, da sprejme ukrepe za preprečevanje IUU ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje.
This Decision placing Sri Lanka on the list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting IUU fishing should therefore be adopted in the context of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 as a result of investigation and dialogue procedures which were carried out in line with the substantive and procedural requirements laid out in that Regulation.
Sklep, ki Šrilanko uvršča na seznam nesodelujočih tretjih držav v boju proti IUU ribolovu, bi zato moral biti sprejet v okviru izvajanja Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008, in sicer na podlagi preiskav in dialogov, ki so bile izvedene v skladu z vsebinskimi in postopkovnimi zahtevami, določenimi v navedeni uredbi.
This Decision is based on those investigation and dialogue procedures, including the correspondence exchanged and the meetings held, as well as the Decision of 15 November 2012 and Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU.
Ta sklep temelji na navedenih preiskavah in dialogih, vključno z izmenjano korespondenco in sestanki, ter na sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012 in na Izvedbenem sklepu 2014/715/EU.
The reasons underlying those procedures and acts are the same as those underlying this Decision.
Razlogi, na katerih temeljijo navedeni postopki in akti, so enaki razlogom, na katerih temelji ta sklep.
This Decision placing Sri Lanka on the list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting IUU fishing should entail the consequences stated in Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
Ta sklep o uvrstitvi Šrilanke na seznam nesodelujočih tretjih držav v boju proti IUU ribolovu, bi moral vključevati posledice, navedene v členu 38 Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008.
Upon the adoption of this Decision placing Sri Lanka on the list of non-cooperating third countries in accordance with Article 33 of the Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, the Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU identifying Sri Lanka as a non-cooperating third country is no longer relevant.
Po sprejetju tega sklepa o uvrstitvi Šrilanke na seznam nesodelujočih tretjih držav v skladu s členom 33 Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008, Izvedbeni sklep 2014/715/EU o opredelitvi Šrilanke kot nesodelujoče tretje države postane brezpredmeten.
Pursuant to Article 34(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 the Council, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, is to remove a third country from the list of non-cooperating third countries if that country demonstrates that the situation that warranted its listing has been rectified.
Svet v skladu s členom 34(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008, s kvalificirano večino in na predlog Komisije, tretjo državo črta s seznama nesodelujočih tretjih držav, če ta država dokaže, da so se razmere, zaradi katerih je bila uvrščena na seznam, popravile.
A removal decision is also to take into consideration whether the identified third countries concerned have taken concrete measures capable of achieving a lasting improvement of the situation.
Pri odločitvi o črtanju se upošteva tudi, ali so opredeljene zadevne tretje države uvedle dejanske ukrepe, s katerimi se lahko doseže trajno izboljšanje razmer.
PROCEDURE WITH RESPECT TO SRI LANKA
POSTOPEK V ZVEZI S ŠRILANKO
During the period from December 2012 to June 2014, Sri Lanka made written submissions making its views known and met the Commission to discuss relevant points.
Obravnavane in upoštevane so bile ustne in pisne pripombe, ki jih je Šrilanka predložila po sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012, Šrilanka pa je bila o ugotovitvah Komisije pisno ali ustno obveščena.
The Commission provided Sri Lanka with relevant information in writing.
Komisija je menila, da Šrilanka ni zadovoljivo obravnavala zadevnih področij in pomanjkljivosti, kot je opisano v sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012.
The oral and written comments submitted by Sri Lanka following the Decision of 15 November 2012 were considered and taken into account, while Sri Lanka was kept informed either orally or in writing of the Commission's deliberations.
Poleg tega je Komisija ugotovila, da ukrepi, predlagani v akcijskem načrtu, niso bili v celoti izvedeni.
The Commission took the view that the areas of concern and shortcomings as described in the Decision of 15 November 2012 had not been addressed sufficiently by Sri Lanka.
OPREDELITEV ŠRILANKE KOT NESODELUJOČE TRETJE DRŽAVE
Moreover, the Commission concluded that the measures suggested in a plan of action had not been fully implemented.
Komisija je v sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012 analizirala dolžnosti Šrilanke in ocenila njeno izpolnjevanje mednarodnih obveznosti kot države zastave, pristanišča, obalne države ali države trga.
IDENTIFICATION OF SRI LANKA AS A NON-COOPERATING THIRD COUNTRY
Pri tem pregledu je upoštevala merila iz člena 31(4) do (7) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008.
In the Decision of 15 November 2012, the Commission analysed the duties of Sri Lanka and evaluated its compliance with its international obligations as flag, port, coastal or market State.
Komisija je pregledala skladnost Šrilanke v skladu z ugotovitvami iz sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012 ter ob upoštevanju ustreznih informacij, ki jih je o tem predložila Šrilanka, predlaganega načrta ukrepov in sprejetih ukrepov za izboljšanje razmer.
For the purpose of that review, the Commission took into account the parameters listed in Article 31(4) to (7) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
Glavne pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je Komisija ugotovila v predlaganem akcijskem načrtu, so se nanašale na več neuspehov pri izvajanju obveznosti mednarodnega prava, predvsem v zvezi z nesprejetjem ustreznega pravnega okvira, pomanjkanjem ustreznega in učinkovitega sistema spremljanja, odsotnostjo opazovalnega programa, odsotnostjo sistema odvračilnih sankcij ter nepravilnim izvajanjem sistema potrdil o ulovu.
The Commission reviewed the compliance of Sri Lanka in line with the findings of the Decision of 15 November 2012, and having regard to relevant information provided thereon by Sri Lanka, the suggested plan of action, and the measures taken to rectify the situation.
Druge ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti se na splošno nanašajo na izpolnjevanje mednarodnih obveznosti, vključno s priporočili in resolucijami regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribolova ter pogoji za registracijo ladij v skladu z mednarodnim pravom.
The main shortcomings identified by the Commission in the suggested plan of action were related to several failures to implement international law obligations, linked in particular to the failure to adopt an adequate legal framework, the lack of an adequate and efficient monitoring system, the lack of an observer scheme, the lack of a deterrent sanctioning system, and to improper implementation of the catch certification scheme.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi pomanjkanje skladnosti s priporočili in resolucijami s strani ustreznih organov, kot je mednarodni akcijski načrt Združenih narodov za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova.
Other identified shortcomings relate, more generally, to compliance with international obligations, including Regional Fisheries Management Organisations recommendations and resolutions, and the conditions for registration of vessels according to international law.
Vendar pa se pomanjkanje skladnosti z nezavezujočimi priporočili in resolucijami obravnava samo kot dodaten dokaz in ne kot podlaga za opredelitev.
A lack of compliance with recommendations and resolutions from relevant bodies such as the International Plan of Action against Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing of the United Nations was also identified.
Komisija je v Izvedbenem sklepu 2014/715/EU opredelila Šrilanko kot nesodelujočo tretjo državo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1005/2008.
However, the lack of compliance with non-binding recommendations and resolutions was considered only as supporting evidence and not as a basis for the identification.
V zvezi z morebitnimi omejitvami za Šrilanko kot državo v razvoju je treba opozoriti, da splošna stopnja razvoja Šrilanke ne vpliva negativno na njen posebni razvojni status in splošno ravnanje na področju ribolova.
In the Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU, the Commission identified Sri Lanka as a non-cooperating third country pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
Ob upoštevanju sklepa z dne 15. novembra 2012 in Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/715/EU ter dialogov s Šrilanko, ki jih je organizirala Komisija, in njihovih rezultatov je mogoče sklepati, da ukrepi, ki jih je uvedla Šrilanka v okviru svojih dolžnosti kot države zastave, ne zadostujejo za izpolnitev členov 94, 117 in 118 Konvencije Združenih narodov o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu ter členov 18, 19 in 20 Sporazuma Združenih narodov o staležih rib.
With respect to the possible constraints upon Sri Lanka as a developing country, it is noted that the specific development status and overall performance of Sri Lanka with respect to fisheries are not impaired by its general level of development.
Zato Šrilanka ni izpolnila svojih dolžnosti kot država zastave v skladu z mednarodnim pravom, da ukrepa za preprečevanje IUU ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje.
Having regards to the Decision of 15 November 2012 and the Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU, and to the dialogue process with Sri Lanka entertained by the Commission and its outcome, it can be concluded that the actions undertaken by Sri Lanka in light of its duties as flag State are insufficient to comply with Articles 94, 117 and 118 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and Articles 18, 19 and 20 of United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement.
PRIPRAVA SEZNAMA NESODELUJOČIH TRETJIH DRŽAV
Thus, Sri Lanka has failed to discharge its duties under international law as flag State to take action to prevent, deter and eliminate IUU fishing.
Na podlagi ugotovitev v zvezi s Šrilanko bi bilo treba to državo, v skladu s členom 33 Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008, vključiti na seznam nesodelujočih tretjih držav, vzpostavljen z Izvedbenim sklepom 2014/170/EU, kakor je bil spremenjen z Izvedbenim sklepom Sveta 2014/914/EU [5].
ESTABLISHMENT OF A LIST OF NON-COOPERATING THIRD COUNTRIES
Postopki v obliki ukrepov, ki bi se morali uporabljati za Šrilanko, so navedeni v členu 38 Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008.
Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU should therefore be amended accordingly.
Treba je opozoriti, da IUU ribolov med drugim izčrpava staleže rib, uničuje morske habitate, ogroža ohranjanje in trajnostno rabo morskih virov, izkrivlja konkurenco, ogroža varnost preskrbe s hrano, postavlja poštene ribiče v nepravičen slabši položaj in slabi obalne skupnosti.
Actions in respect of Sri Lanka in the form of measures that should be applied are listed in Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
Glede na obseg težav, povezanih z IUU ribolovom, se zdi potrebno, da Unija hitro izvede ukrepe glede Šrilanke kot nesodelujoče države.
The prohibition of importation covers all stocks and species, as defined in Article 2(8) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008, since the identification as a non-cooperating third country is not due to the lack of appropriate measures adopted in relation to IUU fishing affecting a given stock or species.
Ob upoštevanju te zadeve bi moral ta sklep začeti veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
It is noted that IUU fishing, inter alia, depletes fish stocks, destroys marine habitats, undermines the conservation and sustainable use of marine resources, distorts competition, endangers food security, puts honest fishermen at an unfair disadvantage and weakens coastal communities.
Če Šrilanka dokaže, da so se razmere, zaradi katerih je bila uvrščena na seznam, popravile, Svet s kvalificirano večino in na predlog Komisije Šrilanko črta s seznama nesodelujočih tretjih držav v skladu s členom 34(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008.
In view of the magnitude of the problems related to IUU fishing, it is considered necessary for the Union to expeditiously implement the actions in respect to Sri Lanka as a non-cooperating country.
Pri vsaki odločitvi o črtanju bi se moralo prav tako upoštevati, ali je Šrilanka uvedla dejanske ukrepe, s katerimi se lahko doseže trajno izboljšanje razmer –
In the light of this matter, this Decision should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
If Sri Lanka demonstrates that the situation that warranted its listing has been rectified, the Council, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, is to remove Sri Lanka from the list of non-cooperating third countries in line with Article 34(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008.
Člen 1
Any removal decision should also take into consideration whether Sri Lanka has taken concrete measures capable of achieving a lasting improvement of the situation,
Demokratična socialistična republika Šrilanka se doda Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2014/170/EU.
Article 1
Ta sklep začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka shall be added to the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU.
V Bruslju, 26. januarja 2015
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Predsednik
Done at Brussels, 26 January 2015.
UL L 286, 29.10.2008, str. 1.
For the Council
Sklep Komisije z dne 15. novembra 2012 o obvestilu tretjim državam, za katere po mnenju Komisije obstaja možnost, da bodo opredeljene kot nesodelujoče tretje države v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1005/2008 o vzpostavitvi sistema Skupnosti za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje (UL C 354, 17.11.2012, str. 1).
The President
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2014/170/EU z dne 24. marca 2014 o pripravi seznama nesodelujočih tretjih držav pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1005/2008 o vzpostavitvi sistema Skupnosti za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje (UL L 91, 27.3.2014, str. 43).
OJ L 286, 29.10.2008, p. 1.
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2014/715/EU z dne 14. oktobra 2014 o opredelitvi tretje države, ki jo Komisija obravnava kot nesodelujočo tretjo državo v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1005/2008 o vzpostavitvi sistema Skupnosti za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje (UL L 297, 15.10.2014, str. 13).
Commission Decision of 15 November 2012 on notifying the third countries that the Commission considers as possible of being identified as non-cooperating third countries pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (OJ C 354, 17.11.2012, p. 1).
Izvedbeni sklep Sveta 2014/914/EU z dne 15. decembra 2014 o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa 2014/170/EU o pripravi seznama nesodelujočih tretjih držav pri boju proti nezakonitemu, neprijavljenemu in nereguliranemu ribolovu v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1005/2008 o vzpostavitvi sistema Skupnosti za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter za njegovo odpravljanje, kar zadeva Belize (UL L 360, 17.12.2014, str. 53).
Council Implementing Decision 2014/170/EU of 24 March 2014 establishing a list of non-cooperating third countries in fighting IUU fishing pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (OJ L 91, 27.3.2014, p. 43).
V skladu s členom 32 Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008 je Komisija 15. novembra 2012 obvestila Šrilanko, da po njenem mnenju obstaja možnost, da bo opredeljena kot nesodelujoča tretja država, in jo pozvala, naj v tesnem sodelovanju z njenimi službami vzpostavi akcijski načrt za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih v sklepu z dne 15. novembra 2012.
Commission Implementing Decision 2014/715/EU of 14 October 2014 identifying a third country that the Commission considers as non- cooperating third country pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (OJ L 297, 15.10.2014, p. 13).
V obdobju od decembra 2012 do junija 2014 je Šrilanka v pisni obliki predložila svoja stališča in se srečala s Komisijo, da bi razpravljala o zadevnih vprašanjih.
Council Decision (EU) 2015/201
Sklep Sveta (EU) 2015/201
on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Sub-Committee, the Customs Sub-Committee and the Geographical Indications Sub-Committee established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, as regards the adoption of decisions of the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Sub-Committee, the Customs Sub-Committee, and the Geographical Indications Sub-Committee on their Rules of Procedure
o stališču, ki se v imenu Evropske unije zavzame v Pododboru za sanitarne in fitosanitarne ukrepe, Pododboru za carino in Pododboru za geografske označbe, ustanovljenih s Pridružitvenim sporazumom med Evropsko unijo in Evropsko skupnostjo za atomsko energijo in njunimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Gruzijo na drugi strani, v zvezi s sprejetjem sklepov Pododbora za sanitarne in fitosanitarne ukrepe, Pododbora za carino in Pododbora za geografske označbe glede njihovih poslovnikov
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 207(4) in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prvega odstavka člena 207(4) Pogodbe v povezavi s členom 218(9) Pogodbe,
Article 431 of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part [1] (‘the Agreement’) provides for provisional application of the Agreement in part.
Člen 431 Pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Evropsko skupnostjo za atomsko energijo in njunimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Gruzijo na drugi strani [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum) določa začasno uporabo delov Sporazuma.
Article 3 of Council Decision 2014/494/EU [2] specifies which parts of the Agreement are to be applied provisionally, including the provisions on the establishment and functioning of the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Sub-Committee (‘SPS Sub-Committee’), the Customs Sub-Committee, and the Geographical Indications Sub-Committee (‘GI Sub-Committee’).
Člen 3 Sklepa Sveta 2014/494/EU [2] določa, kateri deli Sporazuma se začasno uporabljajo, vključno z določbami o ustanovitvi in delovanju Pododbora za sanitarne in fitosanitarne ukrepe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Pododbor SFS), Pododbora za carino in Pododbora za geografske označbe.
Pursuant to Article 65(5) of the Agreement, the SPS Sub-Committee is to adopt its own rules of procedure at its first meeting.
Na podlagi člena 65(5) Sporazuma mora Pododbor SFS sprejeti svoj poslovnik na prvem zasedanju.