natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Eight exporting producers in the country concerned provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da ohrani predlagani vzorec, pri čemer so bile vse zainteresirane strani ustrezno obveščene o končnem izbranem vzorcu.
In accordance with Article 27(1) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and Article 17(1) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, the Commission selected a sample of three exporting producers based on the largest representative volume of exports which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Vzorec proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov je torej naslednji:
In accordance with Article 27(2) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation and Article 17(2) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, all known exporting producers concerned, and the authorities of the country concerned, were invited to comment on the provisionally selected sample.
Chongqing Polycomp International Corporation („CPIC“);
No comments were made.
Jiangsu Changhai Composite Materials Holding Co., Ltd („OCH“) in povezani družbi;
The Commission thus decided to retain the proposed sample and all interested parties were accordingly informed of the finally selected sample.
Changzhou New Changhai Fiberglass Co., Ltd („NCH“) in Changzhou Tianma Group Co., Ltd („Tianma“).
The sample of exporting producers or groups of exporting producers is the following:
Za vse tri družbe se uporablja ime „Jiangsu Changhai Group“;
Chongqing Polycomp International Corporation (‘CPIC’),
Jushi Group Co., Ltd in povezani družbi;
Jiangsu Changhai Composite Materials Holding Co., Ltd (‘OCH’) and its related companies;
Jushi Group Chengdu Co., Ltd in Jushi Group Jiujiang Co., Ltd.
Changzhou New Changhai Fiberglass Co., Ltd (‘NCH’) and Changzhou Tianma Group Co., Ltd (‘Tianma’).
Za vse tri družbe se uporablja ime „Jushi Group“.
These three companies are referred to as the ‘Jiangsu Changhai Group’,
Glede na odgovore na obrazcih za vzorčenje je vzorec zajemal 78 % celotnega izvoza iz LRK v Unijo v OP.
Jushi Group Co., Ltd, and its related companies;
Izpolnjeni vprašalniki in preveritveni obiski
Jushi Group Chengdu Co., Ltd and Jushi Group Jiujiang Co., Ltd.
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala vladi LRK, vsem kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so to zahtevali, in vzorčenim proizvajalcem Unije, uporabnikom ter trgovinskim združenjem, ki so se javili v rokih, določenih v obeh obvestilih o začetku.
These three companies are referred to as the Jushi Group.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so poslali vlada, trije vzorčeni kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, trije vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, 14 uporabnikov in dva nepovezana uvoznika.
The sample represented 78 % of the total export sales from the PRC in volume to the Union during the IP, based on the replies to the sampling forms.
Vendar je eden od uporabnikov vprašalnik izpolnil neustrezno, tako da Komisija ni mogla opraviti smiselne analize predloženih podatkov, čeprav je uporabnika na to večkrat pisno opomnila.
Questionnaire replies and verification visits
Poleg tega se je kot zainteresirana stran v imenu svojih članov javilo združenje „Glass Alliance Europe“, ki zastopa steklarsko industrijo, in predložilo svoje stališče.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the government of PRC, all Chinese exporting producers that had so requested, as well as to the sampled Union producers, users and trade associations that made themselves known within the time limits set out in both Notices of Initiation.
Pisna stališča so poslala tudi številna druga združenja uporabnikov, med drugim „Danish Wind Industry Association“, „Danish Plastics Federation“ in „Groupement de la Plasturgie Industrielle et des Composites“ (GPIC) ter družba Siemens Wind Power AG.
Questionnaire replies were received from the government, three sampled Chinese exporting producers, from the three sampled Union producers, from 14 users and from two unrelated importers.
Poleg tega je pripombe predložila kitajska trgovinska zbornica za uvoz in izvoz proizvodov lahke industrije in obrti („CCCLA“).
However, the reply of one of the users was insufficient which did not allow the Commission to carry out a meaningful analysis of these data despite having sent several reminders.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev subvencioniranja, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
Moreover, an association representing the glass industries ‘Glass Alliance Europe’ came forward as an interested party on behalf of its members and submitted a position statement.
Preveritveni obiski v skladu s členom 16 osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 26 osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe so potekali v prostorih vlade LRK in naslednjih družb:
Written submissions were also received from several associations of users, notably the ‘Danish Wind Industry Association’, the ‘Danish Plastics Federation’ and the ‘Groupement de la Plasturgie Industrielle et des Composites (GPIC)’, as well as from Siemens Wind Power AG.
proizvajalci Unije:
In addition, the China Chamber of Commerce for Import/Export of Light Industrial products & Arts-Crafts (CCCLA) submitted comments.
Fibreglass SPRL, Belgija,
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for the determination of subsidisation, of injury and of the Union interest.
Owens Corning Fibreglass France, Francija,
Verification visits pursuant to Article 16 of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 26 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation were carried out at the government of PRC and at the premises of the following companies:
Johns Manville Slovakia a.s., Slovaška;
Union producers:
proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK:
Fibreglass SPRL, Belgium,
trgovci, povezani s proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK:
Changzhou Tianma Group Co., Ltd,
Basell Polyolefine, Nemčija,
Jushi Group Co., Ltd,
DSM, Nizozemska,
Jushi Group Chengdu Co., Ltd,
DuPont de Nemours, Belgija,
Traders related to the exporting producers located in the PRC:
Exel Composites, Belgija,
Traders related to the exporting producers located in the Union:
Polyone, Nemčija,
Jushi Italia Srl,
Vestas Wind Systems, Danska.
Jushi Spain SA,
Vlada LRK je skratka trdila, da so bile njene pravice do obrambe glede dostopa do dokumentacije, ki je na voljo za pregled zainteresiranim stranem, kršene, ker v nezaupnih dokumentih ni bilo informacij brez jasnega „dobrega razloga“ ali dovolj podrobni povzetki ali izjemoma razlogi, zakaj nezaupen povzetek ni naveden.
Unrelated imports:
Komisija je menila, da je bilo v nezaupni dokumentaciji, ki je na voljo za pregled zainteresiranim stranem, dovolj informacij, na podlagi katerih so lahko zainteresirane strani pregledale podatke, ki jih je Komisija uporabila v analizi, zato se je trditev štela za neutemeljeno.
Helm AG, Germany.
Komisija je vladi sporočila razloge, zakaj je trditve označila za neutemeljene.
Users:
Vlada LRK in en proizvajalec izvoznik sta po dokončnem razkritju ponovila svoje trditve, da je bila določba o zaupnosti preširoko uporabljena, ter zahtevala razkritje vrst izdelkov, ki so jih prodajali proizvajalci Unije, in skupne količine na kontrolno številko izdelka (PCN).
Basell Polyolefine, Germany,
Komisija meni, da pravice do obrambe niso bile kršene, saj so vsi proizvajalci izvozniki prejeli poseben dokument o razkritju številk PCN, ki jih izdelujejo vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije in pri katerih je šlo za konkurenco z LRK.
DSM, The Netherlands,
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
DuPont de Nemours, Belgium,
B. ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
Exel Composites, Belgium,
Zadevni izdelek
Fiberline Composites, Denmark,
rovingov iz steklenih vlaken, razen tistih ki so impregnirani in premazani ter imajo izgubo pri sežigu več kot 3 % (kot je določeno v standardu ISO 1887);
Formax, United Kingdom,
Zadevni izdelek je surovina, ki se najpogosteje uporablja za termoplastične in duroplastne smole v industriji kompozitov.
Polyone, Germany,
Obstajajo tri osnovne vrste izdelkov iz steklenih vlaken, ki jih zajema ta postopek – tj. rezane niti [11], rovingi [12] in rogoznice [13] (razen iz steklene volne).
Vestas Wind Systems, Denmark.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo različne vrste zadevnega izdelka kljub različnemu videzu in morebitnim razlikam pri končni uporabi enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti ter se v osnovi uporabljajo za iste namene.
The government of the PRC claimed, in summary, that its rights of defence in relation to access to the file open for inspection by interested parties were violated because information was missing from the non-confidential file without ‘good cause’ being shown or sufficiently detailed summaries had not been provided, or exceptionally, the reasons for not providing a non-confidential summary had not been given.
Zahtevki za izključitev izdelka
The Commission considered that the non-confidential file open for inspection by interested parties contained sufficient information in order to allow interested parties to inspect the data that was used by the Commission in its analysis and the claim was therefore considered unfounded.
Oznaka KN 70193190
The government was informed of the reasons why the Commission considered that the claims were unfounded.
Po objavi obeh obvestil o začetku je CCCLA izrazila pripombo, da obe obvestili o začetku navajata oznako KN 70193110, medtem ko je pritožnik navedel oznako KN 70193100, ki ne obstaja več.
Following the definitive disclosure, the government of the PRC as well as one exporting producer reiterated that the confidentiality provision was used too extensively and requested disclosure of the product types sold by the Union producers as well as the total quantities per PCN.
Navedla je, da so izdelki, ki so bili prej uvrščeni pod oznako KN 70193100, zdaj uvrščeni pod dve različni oznaki KN:
The Commission considers that there was no breach of the rights of defence as all exporting producers have received a specific disclosure of the PCNs produced by the sampled Union producers on which there was competition with the PRC.
70193110 (rogoznice iz steklenih vlaken – iz filamentov) in 70193190 (rogoznice iz steklenih vlaken – drugo).
B. PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
Ta zahteva je brezpredmetna, ker ta izdelek sploh ne velja za zadevni izdelek.
The product concerned by both investigations is the same as the product defined in the Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 248/2011 and described in both Notices of Initiation, namely chopped glass fibre strands, of a length of not more than 50 mm;
Zato je pred oznako KN „ex“.
The product concerned is the raw material most often used to reinforce thermoplastic and thermoset resins in the composites industry.
Vendar je v veljavni Uredbi navedeno „ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznake KN […] 70193100“, pri čemer se upošteva, da sta bili oznaki KN 70193110 in 70193190 vnovič združeni 1. januarja 2014, ker ni bil pod oznako KN 70193190 uvrščen praktično noben izdelek (saj so bile rogoznice iz steklenih vlaken – drugo, tj. rogoznice iz steklene volne, uvrščene pod oznako KN 70193900).
The resulting composite materials (filament glass fibre reinforced plastics) are used in a large number of industries:
Zahteva za izključitev oznake KN 70193190 torej ni ustrezna.
automotive industry, electric/electronics, wind mill blades, building/construction, tanks/pipes, consumer goods, aerospace/military, etc.
Teksturirani rovingi
There are three basic types of filament glass fibre products covered by this proceeding — namely chopped strands [11], rovings [12] and mats [13] (other than of glass wool).
En uporabnik je zahteval, naj se iz obsega izdelka odstranijo teksturirani rovingi [14], ker jih proizvajalci steklenih vlaken v Uniji ne izdelujejo.
The investigation has shown that, despite differences in appearance and possible differences in final applications of various types, all the different types of the product concerned share the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and are basically used for the same purposes.
Vendar je bilo pri treh družbah v Uniji ugotovljeno, da proizvedejo dovolj teksturiranih rovingov za nabavne potrebe trga.
Product exclusion requests
Preiskavi sta pokazali, da imajo vse različne vrste zadevnega izdelka kljub morebitnim razlikam pri končni uporabi enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti ter se dejansko uporabljajo za iste namene.
CN code 70193190
Zahteva za izključitev teksturiranih rovingov iz obsega izdelka se zato zavrne.
Following the publication of both Notices of Initiation, CCCLA commented that both Notices of Initiation referred to CN code 70193110, whereas the complainant referred to CN code 70193100 and that the latter code no longer exists.
Vlada LRK je po končnem razkritju trdila, da bi bilo treba teksturirane rovinge izključiti, ker (i) je samo en proizvajalec Unije oskrboval trg s teksturiranimi rovingi v omejenih količinah in zato kakršen koli uvoz takih izdelkov ne bi mogel škodovati industriji Unije, (ii) se teksturirani rovingi razlikujejo od neposrednih rovingov, ki imajo zaradi sestavljenega profila, proizvedenega s pultruzijo, večjo moč v navzkrižni smeri, in se izdelujejo v drugačnem proizvodnem procesu, ter (iii) v nasprotju z ukrepi, izvedenimi v zvezi s prejo v prvotni protidampinški preiskavi, Komisija meni, da omejena nadomestljivost ni zadosten dejavnik za to, da bi dovolila izključitev teksturiranih rovingov.
They stated that the products previously classified within CN code 70193100 are now classified under two different CN codes:
V zvezi s prvo trditvijo Komisija ponavlja, da je v Uniji več proizvajalcev z zadostno zmogljivostjo za izpolnjevanje tržnih potreb po teksturiranih rovingih, vendar trenutno to vrsto izdelka prodaja le eden.
70193110 (glass fibre mats of filaments) and 70193190 (glass fibre mats of other).
Argument vlade LRK, da izdelek dejansko prodaja le en proizvajalec Unije, prej kaže na škodo, saj to pomeni, da so se uporabniki preusmerili k drugim dobaviteljem zunaj Unije, zlasti iz LRK.
Given that the present investigations cover certain filament glass fibre products, the CCCLA believes that the products classified under CN code 70193190, namely ‘mats made of glass fibre with no filament’, should be excluded from the scope of the product concerned.
V zvezi z drugo trditvijo je proizvodni proces za teksturirane rovinge enak proizvodnemu procesu za „običajne“ rovinge; edina razlika je dodatni korak vpihavanja zraka v roving, za kar je potrebna le razmeroma poceni dodatna oprema, osnovne tehnične in fizikalne lastnosti izdelka pa ostanejo enake.
This claim is beside the point because such product is not product concerned in the first place.
Teksturirani rovingi so le videti nekoliko bolj kosmati kot „običajni“ rovingi.
The complainant referred to the CN code ex70193100 and explicitly stated that glass wool mats (i.e. other mats or mats made of glass fibre with no filament) are excluded.
V zvezi s tretjo trditvijo je Komisija uporabila enak pristop kot v predhodni preiskavi, v kateri so bili teksturirani rovingi prav tako del zadevnega izdelka in je bila zahteva za izključitev zavrnjena.
This is why ‘ex’ is mentioned before the CN code.
Predložen ni bil noben argument, na podlagi katerega bi bilo mogoče sklepati drugače.
Both Notices of Initiation were published in December 2013 and stated ‘currently falling within CN codes […] 70193110’.
Izdelki, pri katerih industrija Unije ni izpostavljena konkurenci iz LRK
Given that from 1 January 2012, the products previously falling under CN code 70193100 were divided into CN codes 70193110 and 70193190, the Notice of Initiation does not include ‘mats made of glass fibre with no filament’ as it stated ‘currently falling under CN codes […] 70193110’.
Vlada LRK je zahtevala, naj se izdelki, pri katerih industrija Unije ni izpostavljena konkurenci uvoza iz Kitajske (kot je navedeno v nezaupni različici protisubvencijske pritožbe), odstranijo iz obsega izdelka.
The current Regulation however states ‘currently falling within CN codes […] 70193100’ given that the two CN codes 70193110 and 70193190 were merged again as from 1 January 2014 given that the CN code 70193190 stayed in practice empty (as glass fibre mats of other, namely glass wool mats, were rather classified under the CN code 70193900).
Izdelki, na katere se zahteva nanaša, so rezane niti za mokro uporabo (RNMU) in rogoznice.
Therefore, the claim for the exclusion of the CN code 70193190 is not relevant.
RNMU imajo omejen rok uporabe in večje stroške prevoza, ki so posledica dodatne teže zaradi vsebnosti vode.
Texturised rovings
Kljub temu se z RNMU globalno trguje.
One user requested texturised rovings [14] to be removed from the product scope based on the fact that the Union filament glass fibre manufactures do not produce them.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo vse različne vrste zadevnega izdelka kljub različnemu videzu in morebitnim razlikam pri končni uporabi enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti ter se dejansko uporabljajo za iste namene.
However, three companies in the Union were identified as producers of texturised rovings with enough capacity to supply market needs.
RNMU in rogoznice se kot vse druge vrste zadevnega izdelka uporabljajo kot material za utrjevanje.
The investigations showed that, despite possible differences in final applications, all the different types of the product concerned share the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and are basically used for the same purposes.
Poleg tega trditev vlade LRK, da nekateri kitajski izdelki iz steklenih vlaken še niso v velikih količinah prisotni na trgu Unije, ne izključuje možnosti, da bo v prihodnjem poslovnem ravnanju prišlo do spremembe, kar zadeva izvoz teh določenih vrst.
The request to exclude texturised rovings from the product scope is therefore denied.
Zahteva za izključitev teh izdelkov iz obsega izdelka se zato zavrne.
Following the definitive disclosure, the government of the PRC claimed that texturised rovings should be excluded as (i) only one Union producer supplied texturised rovings to the market in limited quantities and that therefore any imports of such products could not injure the Union industry, (ii) the fact that texturised rovings are different from direct rovings as the latter have better cross directional strength of a pultruded composite profile and a different production process and (iii) contrary to what was done in the original anti-dumping investigation in the context of yarns, the Commission considers that the limited substitutability is not a significant factor to permit the exclusion of texturised rovings.
Vlada LRK je po končnem razkritju trdila, da (i) RNMU izdeluje samo en proizvajalec Unije in zato kakršen koli uvoz takih izdelkov ne bi mogel škodovati industriji Unije, (ii) proizvajalci Unije ne trpijo škode v zvezi z navedenimi izdelki, saj je industrija Unije v odprti različici pritožbe trdila, da lahko pri navedenih izdelkih ustvarja 8- do 10-odstotni dobiček, (iii) so za RNMU značilni večja vsebnost vode, omejen rok uporabe in drugačen proizvodni proces, zato se po fizikalnih in kemijskih lastnostih razlikujejo od običajnih rezanih niti, in (iv) v nasprotju z ukrepi, izvedenimi v zvezi s prejo v predhodni preiskavi, Komisija meni, da omejena nadomestljivost ni zadosten dejavnik za to, da bi dovolila izključitev RNMU in rogoznic.
As to the first claim, the Commission reiterates that there are several producers in the Union that have the capacity to supply the market needs of texturised rovings, but only one is currently selling this product type.
Prva trditev se zavrne, ker RNMU izdeluje več proizvajalcev Unije in zato je škoda v zvezi s to vrsto izdelka mogoča tudi za industrijo Unije.
The argument of the government of the PRC that only one Union producer is actually selling the product is rather an indication of injury as this means that users have switched to other suppliers outside the Union, in particular from the PRC.
V zvezi z drugo trditvijo dejstvo, da so nekatere vrste izdelkov v nekem trenutku dobičkonosne, ni zadosten razlog za izključitev teh vrst izdelkov.
As to the second claim, the production process for texturised rovings is identical to the one of ‘normal’ rovings, with the exception that there is one extra step of blowing air inside the roving, which requires only relatively inexpensive additional equipment and does not change the essential technical and physical characteristics of the product.
Poleg tega se RNMU v Unijo uvažajo v veliko manjših količinah kot drugi izdelki iz steklenih vlaken.
The texturised roving merely appears somewhat bushier than the ‘normal’ roving.
Stopnja dobička samo za to vrsto izdelka zato ni reprezentativna za zadevni izdelek.
As to the third claim, the Commission followed the same approach as in the previous investigation where texturised rovings were also part of the product concerned and a request to exclude them was rejected.
V zvezi s tretjo trditvijo zadevni izdelek ni opredeljen glede na svojo vsebnost vode.
No arguments were brought forward that would lead to a different conclusion.
Vsebnost vode RNMU zato ne zadošča za izključitev izdelka.
Products on which the Union industry does not face competition from the PRC
Poleg tega je proizvodni proces za RNMU enak proizvodnemu procesu za rezane niti za suho uporabo (RNSU), le da ima slednji en proizvodni korak manj, in sicer fazo sušenja.
The government of the PRC requested that products on which the Union industry does not face competition from Chinese imports (as stated in the non-confidential version of the anti-subsidy complaint), be removed from the product scope.
V zvezi s četrto trditvijo je Komisija uporabila enak pristop kot v predhodni protidampinški preiskavi, v kateri so bili RNMU prav tako del zadevnega izdelka.
The referred products were wet use chopped strands (WUCS) and mats.
Zahteva za izključitev RNMU iz obsega izdelka se zato zavrne.
WUCS have a limited shelf life and higher transport costs due to the additional weight of the water content.
Podobni izdelek
WUCS are nevertheless globally traded.
Podobno kot pri prejšnji protidampinški preiskavi je bilo za zadevni izdelek in izdelke iz steklenih vlaken, ki se proizvajajo in prodajajo na domačem trgu LRK, ter izdelke iz steklenih vlaken, ki jih v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije, ugotovljeno, da imajo enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične lastnosti ter enako uporabo.
The investigation has shown that, despite some difference in appearance and possible differences in final applications, all the different types of the product concerned share the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and are basically used for the same purposes.
Ti izdelki se zato za namene sedanjih preiskav obravnavajo kot podobni izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in člena 2(c) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
WUCS and mats, like any other product types of the product concerned, are used as reinforcement material.
C. SUBVENCIJA
Moreover, the claim of the government of the PRC that some Chinese filament glass fibre products are not yet present in large quantities on the Union market does not preclude a change in future business behaviour as to exports of these particular types.
Uvod
Therefore, the request to exclude these products from the product scope is denied.
V 12. petletnem načrtu za nacionalni gospodarski in družbeni razvoj LRK je poudarjena strateška vizija vlade LRK za izboljšanje in spodbujanje ključnih industrij, med drugim proizvodnje izdelkov iz steklenih vlaken.