natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to be heard.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za opredelitev statusa novega izvoznika, pogojev tržnega gospodarstva in dampinga.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for the determination of the new exporter status, market economy conditions and dumping.
Komisija je vložniku in z njim povezanim družbam poslala obrazec zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo in vprašalnik ter prejela odgovor v roku, določenem v ta namen.
The Commission sent a market economy treatment claim form and a questionnaire to the applicant and its related companies and received a reply within the deadlines set for that purpose.
Preveritveni obiski so bili opravljeni v prostorih vložnika in povezani družbi na Danskem, tj. družbi Logitrans A/S.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the applicant and the related company in Denmark, Logitrans A/S.
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom
Review investigation period
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom za opredelitev dampinga je potekalo od 1. julija 2012 do 31. decembra 2013 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“).
The review investigation period for the determination of dumping covered the period from 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2013 (review investigation period).
PREISKAVA
INVESTIGATION
Status novega izvoznika
New exporter qualification
Preiskava je potrdila, da vložnik ni izvažal zadevnega izdelka v obdobju prvotne preiskave, tj. od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004, ali v obdobju kasnejše preiskave v zvezi z vmesnim pregledom, tj. od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2011, ter da je začel izvažati v Unijo kasneje.
The investigation confirmed that the applicant did not export the product concerned during both the investigation period of the original investigation, namely from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004, and the investigation period of the subsequent interim review, namely from 1 January to 31 December 2011, and that it started to export to the Union after these periods.
Poleg tega je vložnik uspel dokazati, da ni bil povezan, neposredno ali posredno, z nobenim kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katerega v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom veljajo protidampinški ukrepi.
The applicant was furthermore able to demonstrate that it did not have any links, direct or indirect, with any of the Chinese exporting producers subject to the anti-dumping measures in force with regard to the product concerned.
Zato se potrdi, da bi bilo vložnika treba šteti za novega izvoznika v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe in bi mu bilo zato treba določiti individualno stopnjo dajatve.
Accordingly, it is confirmed that the applicant should be considered a‘new exporter’ in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, and thus an individual margin should be determined for it.
Tržnogospodarska obravnava (TGO)
Market Economy Treatment (MET)
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe Komisija določi normalno vrednost v skladu s členom 2(1) do (6) navedene uredbe za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, ki izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) navedene uredbe in bi se zanje zato lahko odobrila TGO.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation the Commission determines normal value in accordance with Article 2(1) to (6) of that Regulation for the exporting producers in the PRC which comply with the criteria in Article 2(7)(c) of that Regulation and could therefore be granted MET.
Vložnik je zasebno podjetje, ki je v celoti v lasti družbe, katere neposredni delničarji so družbe v Evropski uniji.
The applicant is a privately owned company, wholly owned by a company whose direct shareholders are companies in the European Union.
Vsakodnevne poslovne odločitve sprejema izvršni direktor, ki je državljan Evropske unije in tudi član upravnega odbora.
Daily business decisions are taken by the executive director who is a citizen of the Euroepan Union and also a member of the board of directors.
Pomembne poslovne odločitve se sprejemajo v odboru delničarjev.
Major business decisions are taken by board of shareholders.
Pri odločanju ni bil prisoten noben uradnik, povezan z državo, niti ni bilo nobenega drugega državnega vmešavanja LRK v odločanje.
There was neither the presence of any State related official, nor any other State interference by the PRC in the decision making.
Glavni vložek za proizvodnjo ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov pri vložniku so kovinski polizdelki iz toplo valjanega ogljikovega jekla, kupljenega pri različnih dobaviteljih v LRK, tj. toplo valjanega ogljikovega jekla, ki je že predelano v sestavne dele.
Next, the main input for manufacturing hand pallet trucks and their essentail parts in the case of the applicant were semi-finished metal parts from hot rolled carbon steel purchased from various suppliers in the PRC, that is to say already processed into parts hot rolled carbon steel.
Na podlagi javno dostopnih informacij [8] je bilo ugotovljeno, da so cene predelanih kovinskih delov, ki jih je plačal vložnik, dovolj visoke, da odražajo cene jekla na mednarodnem trgu in dodano vrednost za obdelavo toplo valjanega jekla v kovinske polizdelke.
Based on publicly available information [8] it was established that the prices of the processed metal parts paid by the applicant were sufficiently high to reflect steel prices on the international market and the added value for the processing of the hot rolled steel into semi-finished metal parts.
Zato ni bilo nobenih znakov, da bi se izkrivljanje cen nepredelanega jekla v LRK, ugotovljeno v preiskavi v zvezi z vmesnim pregledom [9], preneslo na cene predelanih kovinskih delov, ki jih je v tej zadevi plačal vložnik.
As a result, the distortion of unprocessed steel prices in the PRC established during the interim review investigation [9] was not found to be carried over in the prices of the processed metal parts paid by the applicant in this case.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je vložnik dokazal, da izpolnjuje merilo 1 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
On the basis of the above, it was thus concluded that the applicant demonstrated that it fulfilled criterion 1 under Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Vložnik je razpolagal z enim samim jasnim knjigovodstvom, revidiranim neodvisno v skladu z mednarodnimi računskimi standardi in uporabljenim za vse namene.
In the next place, the applicant had one clear set of basic accounting records which were independently audited in line with international accounting standards and are applied for all purposes.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da je vložnik dokazal, da izpolnjuje merilo 2 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
It was thus concluded that the applicant demonstrated that it fulfilled criterion 2 under Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Vložnik ni imel nobenega posojila kitajskih finančnih institucij ali posojil, ki ne bi bila dodeljena pod tržnimi pogoji, kar zadeva jamstva, obrestno mero in druge pogoje.
In the next place, the applicant did not have any loans from Chinese financial institutions nor any loans that were not granted under market conditions as regards guarantees, interest rate and other conditions.
Ni bilo znakov kakršnega koli drugega izkrivljanja ali prednosti, povezanih z lokacijo ali prostori, ali kakršnega koli drugega vmešavanja države v poslovanje vložnika.
There were no indications of any other distortions or advantages related to the location or premises or any other State interference in the operation of the applicant.
Vložnik se ni obravnaval kot visokotehnološka družba, tako da ne bi mogel prejeti nobene državne ugodnosti v tej vlogi.
Neither was the applicant considered as a high tech company so that it could potentially receive any State benefit in that capacity.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da je vložnik dokazal, da izpolnjuje merilo 3 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
It was thus concluded that the applicant demonstrated that it fulfilled criterion 3 under Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bil vložnik predmet zadevnega kitajskega stečajnega prava in prava lastninskih razmerij, katerih uporaba zagotavlja pravno varnost in stabilnost pri poslovanju družb.
In the next place, the applicant was found to be subject to the relevant Chinese bankruptcy and property laws, the application of which is designed to guarantee legal certainty and stability for the operation of firms.
Nobenih znakov ni bilo, da se za vložnika ne bi uporabljali in izvajali ti dve vrsti prava.
There were no indications that these laws would not be applicable and implemented for the applicant.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da je vložnik dokazal, da izpolnjuje merilo 4 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
It was thus concluded that the applicant demonstrated that it fulfilled criterion 4 under Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava tudi ni pokazala omejitev v zvezi z uporabo in pretvorbo tujih valut.
Last, the investigation did not reveal any restrictions concerning the use and conversion of foreign currency.
Devizne transakcije vložnika so se izvajale po tržnem tečaju, družba pa je lahko prosto razpolagala z lastnimi sredstvi.
The applicant ' s foreign exchange transactions were conducted according to market rates and it was able to freely dispose of the usage of its own funds.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da je vložnik dokazal, da izpolnjuje merilo 5 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
It was thus concluded that the applicant demonstrated that it fulfilled criterion 5 under Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenih ugotovitev je bilo sklenjeno, da se vložniku lahko odobri TGO, tako da bi se njegova normalna vrednost določila v skladu s členom 2(1) do (6) osnovne uredbe.
On the basis of the above findings, it was concluded that the applicant could be granted MET so that its normal value would be determined in accordance with Article 2(1) to (6) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je vložniku, organom LRK in industriji Unije razkrila rezultate analize TGO in jim ponudila možnost, da podajo pripombe.
The Commission disclosed the results of the MET analysis to the applicant, the authorities of the PRC and the Union industry and gave them the opporunity to provide comments.
Industrija Unije je trdila, da mednarodne cene jekla, ki temeljijo na javno dostopnih informacijah (glej uvodno izjavo 24 zgoraj), niso ustrezna osnova za primerjavo, ker so cene, ki jih plačujejo manjši gospodarski subjekti na trgu jekla, vsaj 20 % nad mednarodnimi referenčnimi cenami.
The Union industry claimed that the international steel price based on publicly available information (see recital 24 above) is not a suitable basis for comparison since the prices paid by smaller operators in the steel market would be at least 20 % above the international referece prices.
Industrija Unije je tudi trdila, da je bila cena, plačana za predelane kovinske dele, ki se uporabljajo v proizvodnji ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet v Uniji, veliko višja od cene, ki jo je plačal vložnik, kar samo po sebi pomeni, da je bila cena, ki jo je plačal vložnik za takšne dele, izkrivljena.
The Union industry further claimed that the price paid for processed metal parts used in the production of hand pallet trucks in the Union would be far above the prices paid by the applicant which in itself would indicate that the price paid by the applicant for such parts would be distorted.
Mednarodne referenčne cene so se uporabile tudi za podlago za primerjavo pri preiskavi v zvezi z vmesnim pregledom in te cene niso bile prilagojene [10].
International reference prices were also used as a basis of comparison in the interim review investigation and no adjustments were made to these prices [10].
Na kakršno koli premijo, ki bi bila izplačana poleg mednarodnih referenčnih cen, bi vplivali posamezni dejavniki, ki so specifični za vsak subjekt na trgu, in ni nobene objektivne podlage za splošno prilagoditev zaradi domnevno višjih cen.
Indeed, as any premium paid over the international reference prices would depend on individual factors specific to each operator in the market, there is no objective basis to make a general adjustment for an alleged mark up.
Trditev, da bi bilo treba prilagoditi mednarodne referenčne cene, je bila zato zavrnjena.
The claim that international reference prices should be adjusted was therefore rejected.
Kar zadeva ceno, plačano za predelane kovinske dele, ki se uporabljajo v proizvodnji ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet v Uniji, na podlagi dokazov, ki jih je predložila industrija Unije, ni bilo mogoče sklepati, da je bila cena, ki jo je plačal vložnik za takšne dele, izkrivljena.
As regards the price paid for processed metal parts used in the production of hand pallet trucks in the Union, the supporting evidence submitted by the Union industry could not demonstrate that the price paid by the applicant for such parts would be distorted.
To pa zaradi tega, ker bi, kakor je opisano v uvodni izjavi 33 zgoraj, na kakršno koli premijo, ki bi bila izplačana poleg mednarodnih referenčnih cen, vplivali posamezni dejavniki, ki so specifični za vsakega subjekta na trgu, in ni nobene objektivne podlage za splošno prilagoditev zaradi domnevno višjih cen.
This was because, as described in recital 33 above, any premium paid over the international reference prices would depend on individual factors specific to each operator in the market, hence there is no objective basis to make a general adjustment for an alleged mark up.
Poleg tega je iz predloženih dokazov razvidno precej drugih dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na ceno takih kovinskih delov, razen cen jekla, na podlagi katerih ni bilo mogoče sklepati o ustrezni ravni takšnih delov, ki bi lahko bila uporabljena kot referenčna vrednost.
Moreover, the evidence submitted showed a significant number of other factors affecting the price of such metal parts apart from the steel prices which did not allow any conclusion as to the appropriate level of such parts which could be used as a benchmark.
Zato je bil zavrnjen argument, da cene, plačane za predelane kovinske dele v Uniji, kažejo na to, da je bila cena, ki jo je vložnik plačal za takšne dele, izkrivljena.
Therefore, the argument that prices paid for processed metal parts in the Union would indicate that the price paid by the applicant for such parts would be distorted was rejected.
Industrija Unije je tudi trdila, da so cene jekla v LRK subvencionirane in na splošno izkrivljene ter da to dejstvo samo po sebi zadostuje, da se tudi cene nadalje predelanih kovinskih delov v LRK obravnavajo kot izkrivljene.
The Union industry also argued that the prices of steel in the PRC are subsidised and generally distorted and that this fact in itself would be sufficient to consider prices of further processed metal parts in the PRC also to be distorted.
V skladu s sodno prakso Splošnega sodišča se mora kljub temu, da se Komisija lahko opre na makroekonomske premisleke, kot so izkrivljanja cen surovin na ravni industrije/sektorja, TGO določiti posamezno za vsako družbo, tj. oceniti je treba, ali cene, ki jih plačajo posamezne družbe za svoje surovine, odražajo tržne vrednosti [11].
According to the jurisprudence of the General Court whilst the Commission can rely on macroeconomic considerations such as raw material price distortions at industry/sector level, the MET determination must be made individually for each company, that is to say assessing whether the prices paid by the individual company for its input reflect market values [11].
Poleg tega je bilo tudi pojasnjeno, da Komisija lahko primerja kitajske domače povprečne cene surovin s povprečnimi mednarodnimi cenami, da bi ugotovila, ali bi bilo TGO mogoče odobriti na tej podlagi [12].
Furthermore, it was also clarified that the Commission may compare the Chinese domestic average prices of the raw material, with the average international prices in order to determine whether MET should be granted on this ground [12].
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 24, je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni bilo dokazov, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče trditi, da so se ugotovljena izkrivljanja cen na trgu nepredelanega jekla v LRK prenesla na cene predelanih kovinskih delov, ki jih je plačal vložnik.
As explained in recital 24 it was established that the observed price distortions in the market of unprocessed steel in the PRC were not found to be carried over in the prices of the processed metal parts paid by the applicant.
Ta pristop je v skladu s sodno prakso, saj upošteva individualni položaj vložnika, zato so bile trditve industrije Unije v zvezi s tem zavrnjene.
This approach is in line with the jurisprudence as it considers the individual situation of the applicant and the argument of the Union industry in this regard was therefore rejected.
Nazadnje je industrija Unije trdila, da bi dodelitev individualne protidampinške stopnje vložniku pomenila veliko tveganje izogibanja, saj je vložnik že kupil ročne vozičke za premeščanje palet od drugega dobavitelja v LRK in jih nato izvozil v Unijo.
Finally, the Union industry claimed that attributing an individual anti-dumping margin to the applicant would consitute a high risk of circumvention as the applicant already purchased hand pallet trucks from another supplier in the PRC and re-exported them to the Union.
Trditev glede povečanega tveganja izogibanja ni bila podprta z nobenim dokazom.
The claim for an increased risk of circumvention was not supported by any evidence.
Zlasti je bilo v zvezi z vložnikom ugotovljeno, da ni povezan z zadevnim dobaviteljem ali s katerim koli drugim dobaviteljem v LRK.
In particular, the applicant was found not to be related to the supplier in question or to any other supplier in the PRC.
Preiskava zato ni potrdila, da bi v tem posebnem primeru obstajalo kakršno koli večje tveganje za izogibanje ukrepom.
The investigation did therefore not confirm any increased risk of circumvention in this specific case.
Poleg tega tveganje izogibanja samo po sebi ni merilo iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe in zato ni pomembno pri določanju, ali družba izpolnjuje pogoje za TGO.
Finally, the risk of circumvention per se is not a criterion mentioned in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation and it is therefore not relevant in the determination whether a company qualifies for MET.
Ta argument je bil zato zavrnjen.
Consequently, this argument was rejected.
Industrija Unije je tudi trdila, da Komisija pri svoji primerjavi cen iz uvodne izjave 24 ni ustrezno upoštevala stroškov predelave kovinskih delov.
The Union industry also claimed that the price comparison made by the Commission referred to in recital 24 did not properly take into consideration the processing cost of the metal parts.
Zato se je štelo, da se s temi pripombami le ponavljajo prejšnji argumenti, ki so bili že obravnavani v uvodnih izjavah 32 do 37 zgoraj, in so bile zato zavrnjene.
The claims made by the Union industry were however not supported by any furher evidence.
Damping
Therefore, it was considered that these comments were merely reiteration of the earlier arguments already addressed in recitals 32 to 37 above and they were rejected.
Normalna vrednost
Dumping
Komisija je najprej proučila, ali je bil celotni obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka, ki jo je vložnik zagotovil neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu, reprezentativen, tj. ali je celoten obseg takšne prodaje v obdobju preiskave predstavljal najmanj 5 % njegovega celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Normal value
Komisija je ugotovila, da celotni obseg prodaje podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu ni bil reprezentativen, saj je bil manjši od praga 5 %.
The Commission first examined whether the applicant ' s total domestic sales volume of the like product to independent customers on the domestic market was representative, namely whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of its total export sales volume of the product concerned to the Union during the review investigation period in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Ker ni bilo reprezentativnega obsega domače prodaje, je Komisija konstruirala normalno vrednost v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission found that the overall sales of the like product on the domestic market were not representative as they were below the 5 % threshold.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da so se nastali tehtani povprečni prodajni, splošni in administrativni stroški (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PSA) ter tehtani povprečni dobiček, ki ga je s prodajo podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu v običajnem poteku trgovanja v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ustvaril vložnik, prišteli k njihovim povprečnim proizvodnim stroškom v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Since there were no representative domestic sales volume, the Commission constructed normal value in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Izvozna cena
Normal value was constructed by adding to the average cost of production during the review investigation period the weighted average selling, general and administrative (SG & A) expenses incurred and the weighted average profit realised by the applicant on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the review investigation period.
Vložnik je izvažal ročne vozičke za premeščanje palet in njihove osnovne dele (hidravliko), ki so tudi zadevni izdelek.
Export price
Vrednost in obseg izvoza hidravlike sta bila v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom sorazmerno nizka.
The applicant exported hand pallet trucks but also their essential parts (hydraulics) which are also product concerned.
Poleg tega se hidravlika ni ponovno prodajala neodvisnim strankam v povezani družbi v Uniji.
Exports of hydraulics were of relatively low value and volume during the review investigation period.
Uporabljala se je izključno za proizvodnjo ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet v povezani družbi v Uniji, ki je nato končni izdelek (ročne vozičke za premeščanje palet) prodala na trgu Unije.
In addition, the hydraulics were not resold to independent customers by the related company in the Union.
Zato cena hidravlike pri nadaljnji prodaji ni obstajala.
Instead, they were used exclusively for the production of hand pallet trucks by the related company in the Union which then sold the finished product (hand pallet trucks) on the Union market.
Poleg tega, ker trenutni pregled zadeva samo eno podjetje, ni bilo na voljo drugih podatkov, na podlagi katerih bi se lahko cene pri nadaljnji prodaji hidravlike razumno določile.
Consequently, there was no resale price for hydraulics.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega za hidravliko izvozna cena ni bila določena.
Moreover, since the present review concerns only one company, there was no other data available on the basis of which a resale price of hydraulics could be reasonably established.
V dogovoru z vložnikom se je izvozna cena, ki je bila določena za ročne vozičke za premeščanje palet, štela za reprezentativno za osnovne dele in je bila v tem smislu tudi uporabljena.
In light of that, no export price was established for the hydraulics.
Izvoz je bil opravljen prek povezanega uvoznika v Uniji, ki ga je prodajal naprej neodvisnim strankam v Uniji.
In agreement with the applicant, the export price established for the hand pallet trucks was considered to be representative for the essential parts, and it was thus used.
Izvozna cena je bila zato v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi cene, po kateri je bil uvoženi izdelek najprej prodan naprej neodvisni stranki v Uniji, od te cene pa so se odbili vsi stroški, ki so nastali med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo (PSA), ter ustrezna stopnja dobička.
Export sales were made via the related importer in the Union who resold the product further to independent customers in the Union.
Uporabljeni so bili dejanski PSA povezanega uvoznika.