natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Materiality of extensions or changes in the models usually depends on the type and category of the extension or change proposed (which should be reflected in qualitative criteria), and on their potential to alter the own funds requirements or, where applicable, the risk-weighted exposure amounts (which should be reflected in the quantitative criteria).
Pomembnost razširitev ali sprememb modelov je običajno odvisna od vrste in kategorije predlagane razširitve ali spremembe (kar bi se moralo odražati v kvalitativnih merilih) ter njenega potenciala za spremembo kapitalskih zahtev ali, kjer je to primerno, zneskov tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti (kar bi se moralo odražati v kvantitativnih merilih).
Therefore any quantitative criteria for reviewing the materiality of extensions or changes should take the form of a threshold based on the percentage change of own funds requirements or, where applicable, of risk-weighted exposure amounts before and after the change.
Zato bi morala biti kvantitativna merila za pregled pomembnosti razširitev ali sprememb oblikovana kot prag, ki temelji na odstotkovni spremembi kapitalskih zahtev ali, kjer je primerno, zneskov tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti pred spremembo in po njej.
While for extensions and changes to AMA approaches, the quantitative threshold should be calculated, for the sake of simplicity, on the basis of the own funds requirements, for changes to the IRB approaches the threshold should be calculated on the basis of risk-weighted exposure amounts, in order to avoid that the thresholds are unduly influenced by differences in the amounts of credit value adjustments made, which affect own funds requirements, but not risk-weighted exposure amounts.
Medtem ko bi bilo treba za razširitve in spremembe pristopov AMA zaradi enostavnosti kvantitativni prag izračunati na podlagi kapitalskih zahtev, bi bilo treba prag za spremembe pristopov IRB izračunati na podlagi zneskov tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti, da bi se izognili temu, da bi na pragove neupravičeno vplivale razlike v zneskih izvedenih prilagoditev kreditnega vrednotenja, ki vplivajo na kapitalske zahteve, ne pa na zneske tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti.
Moreover, quantitative thresholds should be designed to take into account the overall impact of the extensions or changes on the capital required based on the internal approaches as well as the standardised approaches, in order to reflect the extent to which internal approaches are used for the overall own funds requirements or risk-weighted exposure amounts.
Poleg tega bi morali biti kvantitativni pragovi oblikovani tako, da se upošteva skupni učinek razširitev ali sprememb na zahtevani kapital na podlagi notranjih pristopov in tudi standardiziranih pristopov, in sicer zaradi upoštevanja obsega, v katerem se notranji pristopi uporabljajo za skupne kapitalske zahteve ali zneske tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti.
This applies to all thresholds for both approaches, except in relation to the second threshold in Article 4(1)(c)(ii) for the IRB approach and the prior notification threshold for the IRB approach which are designed with regard to the impact of changes on the risk-weighted exposure amounts covered by the range of application of a specific model.
To velja za vse pragove pri obeh pristopih, razen v zvezi z drugim pragom iz člena 4(1)(c)(ii) pri pristopu IRB in pragom za predhodno uradno obvestilo pri pristopu IRB, ki sta oblikovana glede na učinek sprememb na zneske tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti, zajete z obsegom uporabe posebnega modela.
For both the IRB approach and the AMA, the calculations to derive the impact of a given extension or change should be made with reference to the same point in time, given that the set of exposures (in the case of the IRB approach) and the risk profile (in the case of the AMA) are relatively stable in time.
Za pristop IRB in pristop AMA bi morali biti izračuni za izpeljavo učinka določenega podaljšanja ali spremembe opravljeni z upoštevanjem iste časovne točke, saj sta sklop izpostavljenosti (v primeru pristopa IRB) in profil tveganja (v primeru pristopa AMA) skozi čas razmeroma stabilna.
Competent authorities may at any time take appropriate supervisory measures with regard to model extensions and changes that have been notified, based on the on-going review of existing permissions to use internal approaches provided in Article 101 of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
Pristojni organi lahko kadar koli sprejmejo ustrezne nadzorne ukrepe v zvezi z razširitvami in spremembami modela, o katerih so bili uradno obveščeni, na podlagi rednega pregleda obstoječih dovoljenj za uporabo notranjih pristopov iz člena 101 Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2].
On the one hand, this is in order to ensure that the requirements laid down in Part Three, Title II, Chapter 3, Section 6, or Part Three, Title III, Chapter 4 or Part Three, Title IV, Chapter 5 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 remain satisfied.
Po eni strani je to potrebno zaradi zagotovitve, da ostanejo zahteve iz oddelka 6 poglavja 3 naslova II dela 3 ali poglavja 4 naslova III dela 3 ali poglavja 5 naslova IV dela 3 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 izpolnjene.
On the other hand, rules are necessary to establish the triggers for new approvals and notifications of extensions and changes to internal approaches.
Po drugi strani pa so pravila potrebna zaradi vzpostavitve sprožilcev za nova dovoljenja in uradna obvestila v zvezi z razširitvami in spremembami notranjih pristopov.
Such rules should not affect supervisory internal model review approaches or administrative processes provided for by Article 20(8) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Takšni predpisi ne bi smeli vplivati na nadzorne pristope za pregled notranjega modela ali upravne postopke iz člena 20(8) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
Changes to the permanent partial use of internal approaches or, where applicable, to the sequential implementation of internal approaches are covered by Articles 148 and 150 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 for IRB approach and Article 314 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 for AMA.
Spremembe stalnih izvzetij pri notranjih pristopih ali, kjer je to ustrezno, postopnega izvajanja pri notranjih pristopih so zajete s členoma 148 in 150 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 za pristop IRB in členom 314 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 za pristop AMA.
Therefore those types of changes should not be covered by this Regulation.
Zato te vrste sprememb ne bi smele biti zajete s to uredbo.
The permission of competent authorities relates to the methods, processes, controls, data collection and IT systems of the approaches, therefore on-going alignment of the models to the calculation data-set used, based on the approved methods, processes, controls, data collection and IT systems, should not be covered by this Regulation.
Dovoljenje pristojnih organov se nanaša na metode, procese, kontrole, zbiranje podatkov in informacijske sisteme pristopov, zato redno usklajevanje modelov glede na uporabljen podatkovni niz za izračun, ki temelji na odobrenih metodah, procesih, kontrolah, zbiranju podatkov in informacijskih sistemih, ne bi smelo biti zajeto s to uredbo.
In order for competent authorities to be able to assess that institutions have applied the rules on assessing the materiality of extensions and changes correctly, appropriate documentation should be submitted by institutions to competent authorities.
Da bi pristojni organi lahko ocenili, ali so institucije pravilno uporabile pravila za ocenjevanje pomembnosti razširitev in sprememb, bi morale institucije pristojnim organom predložiti ustrezno dokumentacijo.
In order to reduce the supervisory burden on institutions and to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of competent authorities' procedures in that respect, rules should be laid down to specify documentation requirements to accompany applications for approval or notifications of extensions and changes.
Za zmanjšanje nadzornega bremena institucij ter povečanje učinkovitosti in uspešnosti postopkov pristojnih organov v tem smislu bi bilo treba določiti pravila za opredelitev zahtev glede dokumentacije, ki se priloži vlogam za izdajo dovoljenja ali uradnim obvestilom o razširitvah in spremembah.
The provisions of this Regulation are closely linked, since they refer to extensions and/or changes to AMA and IRB approaches for own funds requirements for credit and operational risk and since relevant supervisory issues and procedures are similar for those two types of internal approaches.
Določbe te uredbe so tesno povezane, saj se nanašajo na razširitve in/ali spremembe pristopov AMA in IRB v zvezi s kapitalskimi zahtevami za kreditno in operativno tveganje, zadevna nadzorna vprašanja in postopki pa so za ti dve vrsti notranjih pristopov podobni.
To ensure coherence between those provisions, and to facilitate a comprehensive view and access in a coordinated fashion to them by persons subject to relevant obligations, it is desirable that they enter into force at the same time and include all of the regulatory technical standards required by Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on extensions and changes to internal models for credit and operational risk, in a single Regulation.
Da se zagotovi skladnost med temi določbami in se osebam, za katere se zadevne določbe uporabljajo, na usklajen način omogoči celovit pregled in dostop do njih, je zaželeno, da začnejo veljati hkrati in da so vsi regulativni tehnični standardi, ki jih zahteva Uredba (EU) št. 575/2013 v zvezi z razširitvami in spremembami notranjih modelov za kreditno in operativno tveganje, vključeni v eno samo uredbo.
However, since point (a) in the first subparagraph of Article 312(4) deals with a different subject matter, this regulation only addresses points (b) and (c).
Ker pa je predmet urejanja točke (a) v prvem pododstavku člena 312(4) drugačen, obravnava ta uredba samo točki (b) in (c).
The European Banking Authority has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits, and requested the opinion of the Banking Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3],
Evropski bančni organ je opravil odprta javna posvetovanja o osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, na katerih temelji ta uredba, analiziral morebitne z njimi povezane stroške in koristi ter zaprosil za mnenje interesno skupino za bančništvo, ustanovljeno v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] –
This Regulation lays down the conditions for assessing the materiality of extensions and changes to the Internal Rating Based approaches and the Advanced Measurement Approaches permitted in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, including the modalities of the notifications of such changes and extentensions.
Ta uredba določa pogoje za ocenjevanje pomembnosti razširitev in sprememb pristopov na osnovi notranjih bonitetnih ocen in naprednih pristopov za merjenje, ki so dovoljeni v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 575/2013, vključno z načini uradnega obveščanja o zadevnih spremembah in razširitvah.
Categories of extensions and changes
Kategorije razširitev in sprememb
The materiality of changes to the range of application of a rating system or an internal models approach to equity exposures, or of changes to the rating systems or internal models approach to equity exposures, for the Internal Rating Based approach (‘changes in the IRB approach’) or of the extensions and changes for the Advanced Measurement Approach, (‘extensions and changes in the AMA’) shall be classified into one of the following categories:
Pomembnost sprememb obsega uporabe bonitetnega sistema ali pristopa notranjih modelov za izpostavljenosti iz naslova lastniških instrumentov ali sprememb bonitetnih sistemov ali pristopa notranjih modelov za izpostavljenosti iz naslova lastniških instrumentov za pristop na osnovi notranjih bonitetnih ocen (v nadaljnjem besedilu: spremembe pristopa IRB) ali razširitev in sprememb za napredni pristop za merjenje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: razširitve in spremembe pristopa AMA) se razvrsti v eno od naslednjih kategorij:
material extensions and changes, which, according to Articles 143(3) and 312(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, require permission from the competent authorities;
pomembne razširitve in spremembe, za katere se v skladu s členoma 143(3) in 312(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 zahteva dovoljenje pristojnih organov;
other extensions and changes, which require notification to the competent authorities.
druge razširitve in spremembe, za katere se zahteva uradno obvestilo pristojnim organom.
The extensions and changes referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 shall further be classified into:
Razširitve in spremembe iz točke (b) odstavka 1 se nadalje delijo na:
extensions and changes that require notification before their implementation;
razširitve in spremembe, za katere se zahteva uradno obvestilo pred njihovo izvedbo;
extensions and changes that require notification after their implementation.
razširitve in spremembe, za katere se zahteva uradno obvestilo po njihovi izvedbi.
Principles of classification of extensions and changes
Načela za razvrščanje razširitev in sprememb
The classification of changes in the IRB approach shall be carried out in accordance with this Article and Articles 4 and 5.
Razvrščanje sprememb pri pristopu IRB se izvede v skladu s tem členom ter členoma 4 in 5.
The classification of extensions and changes in the AMA shall be carried out in accordance with this Article and Articles 6 and 7.
Razvrščanje razširitev in sprememb pri pristopu AMA se izvede v skladu s tem členom ter členoma 6 in 7.
Where institutions are required to calculate the quantitative impact of any extension or change on own funds requirements or, where applicable, on risk-weighted exposure amounts, they shall apply the following methodology:
Če morajo institucije izračunati kvantitativni učinek kakršne koli razširitve ali spremembe kapitalskih zahtev ali, kjer je to primerno, zneskov tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti, uporabijo naslednjo metodologijo:
for the purpose of the assessment of the quantitative impact institutions shall use the most recent data available;
za namen ocene kvantitativnega učinka institucije uporabijo najnovejše razpoložljive podatke;
where a precise assessment of the quantitative impact is not feasible, institutions shall instead perform an assessment of the impact based on a representative sample or other reliable inference methodologies;
če natančna ocena kvantitativnega učinka ni mogoča, institucije namesto nje izvedejo oceno učinka na podlagi reprezentativnega vzorca ali drugih zanesljivih metodologij, ki temeljijo na sklepanju;
for changes having no direct quantitative impact, no quantitative impact as laid down in Article 4(1)(c) for IRB approach or Article 6(1)(c) for AMA shall be calculated.
za spremembe, ki nimajo neposrednega kvantitativnega učinka, se kvantitativni učinek iz člena 4(1)(c) za pristop IRB ali člena 6(1)(c) za pristop AMA ne izračuna.
One material extension or change shall not be split into several changes or extensions of lower materiality.
Ena pomembna razširitev ali sprememba se ne sme razdeliti na več manj pomembnih sprememb ali razširitev.
In case of doubt, institutions shall assign extensions and changes to the category of the highest potential materiality.
V primeru dvoma institucije razširitve in spremembe razvrstijo v kategorijo z največjo potencialno pomembnostjo.
Where competent authorities have provided their permission in relation to a material extension or change, institutions shall calculate the own funds requirements based on the approved extension or change from the date specified in the new permission which shall replace the prior one.
Če so pristojni organi izdali dovoljenje v zvezi s pomembno razširitvijo ali spremembo, institucije od datuma, navedenega v novem dovoljenju, ki nadomesti predhodnega, izračunavajo kapitalske zahteve na podlagi odobrene razširitve ali spremembe.
The non-implementation on the date specified in the new permission of an extension or change for which permission from competent authorities has been given, shall require a new permission from competent authorities which shall be applied for without undue delay.
Če se razširitev ali sprememba, za katero so pristojni organi izdali dovoljenje, ne izvede na datum, določen v novem dovoljenju, je potrebno novo dovoljenje pristojnih organov, za katero se zaprosi brez nepotrebnega odlašanja.
In case of delay of the implementation of an extension or change for which permission from the competent authority has been granted, the institution shall notify the competent authority and present to the competent authority a plan for a timely implementation of the approved extension or change, which it shall apply within a period to be agreed with the competent authority.
V primeru zamude pri izvedbi razširitve ali spremembe, za katero je pristojni organ izdal dovoljenje, institucija uradno obvesti pristojni organ in mu predloži načrt za čim prejšnjo izvedbo odobrene razširitve ali spremembe, ki ga izvede v roku, o katerem se dogovori s pristojnim organom.
Where an extension or change is classified as one requiring prior notification to competent authorities, and where, subsequently to the notification, institutions decide not to implement the extension or change, institutions shall notify without undue delay the competent authorities of this decision.
V primeru, da je razširitev ali sprememba razvrščena kot taka, za katero se zahteva predhodno uradno obvestilo pristojnim organom, in če se po uradnem obvestilu institucije odločijo, da razširitve ali spremembe ne bodo izvedle, institucije o taki odločitvi brez nepotrebnega odlašanja obvestijo pristojne organe.
Material changes to the IRB approach
Pomembne spremembe pristopa IRB
Changes to the IRB approach shall be considered material if they fulfil any of the following conditions:
Spremembe pristopa IRB se štejejo za pomembne, če izpolnjujejo katerega koli od naslednjih pogojev:
they fall under any of the changes to the range of application of a rating system or internal models approach to equity exposures described in Annex I, Part I, Section 1;
spadajo med spremembe obsega uporabe bonitetnega sistema ali pristopa notranjih modelov za izpostavljenosti iz naslova lastniških instrumentov, ki so opisane v oddelku 1 dela I Priloge I;
they fall under any changes to the rating systems or internal models approach to equity exposures described in Annex I, Part II, Section 1;
spadajo med spremembe bonitetnih sistemov ali pristopa notranjih modelov za izpostavljenosti iz naslova lastniških instrumentov, ki so opisane v oddelku 1 dela II Priloge I;
they result in either of the following:
njihova posledica je eno od naslednjega:
a decrease of 1,5 % of either of the following:
zmanjšanje za 1,5 % česar koli od naslednjega:
the overall EU parent institution's consolidated risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit and dilution risk,
skupnih konsolidiranih zneskov tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti za kreditno tveganje in tveganje zmanjšanja vrednosti odkupljenih denarnih terjatev EU nadrejene institucije,
the overall risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit and dilution risk in the case of an institution which is neither a parent institution, nor a subsidiary;
v primeru institucije, ki ni niti nadrejena institucija niti podrejena institucija, skupnih zneskov tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti za kreditno tveganje in tveganje zmanjšanja vrednosti odkupljenih denarnih terjatev;
a decrease of 15 % or more of the risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit and dilution risk associated with the range of application of the internal rating system or internal models approach to equity exposures.
zmanjšanje za 15 % ali več zneskov tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti za kreditno tveganje in tveganje zmanjšanja vrednosti odkupljenih denarnih terjatev, ki je povezano z obsegom uporabe notranjega bonitetnega sistema ali pristopa notranjih modelov za izpostavljenosti iz naslova lastniških instrumentov.
For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c)(i) of this Article, and in accordance with Article 3(2), the impact of the change shall be assessed as a ratio calculated as follows:
Za namene odstavka (1)(c)(i) tega člena in v skladu s členom 3(2) se učinek spremembe oceni kot razmerje, ki se izračuna na naslednji način:
in the numerator, the difference in the risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit and dilution risk associated with the range of application of the internal rating system or the internal models approach to equity exposures before and after the change at the EU parent institution's consolidated level or at the institution level which is neither a parent institution, nor a subsidiary;
v števcu se uporabi razlika v zneskih tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti za kreditno tveganje in tveganje zmanjšanja vrednosti odkupljenih denarnih terjatev, ki je povezana z obsegom uporabe notranjega bonitetnega sistema ali pristopa notranjih modelov za izpostavljenosti iz naslova lastniških instrumentov pred spremembo na konsolidirani ravni EU nadrejene institucije ali na ravni institucije, ki ni niti nadrejena institucija niti podrejena institucija, in po njej;
in the denominator the overall risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit and dilution risk before the change at the EU parent institution's consolidated level or, respectively, at the institution level which is neither a parent institution, nor a subsidiary.
v imenovalcu se uporabijo skupni zneski tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti za kreditno tveganje in tveganje zmanjšanja vrednosti odkupljenih denarnih terjatev pred spremembo na konsolidirani ravni EU nadrejene institucije oziroma na ravni institucije, ki ni niti nadrejena institucija niti podrejena institucija.
The calculation shall refer to the same point in time.
Izračun se nanaša na isto časovno točko.
The determination of the impact on risk-weighted exposure amounts shall refer only to the impact of the change to the IRB approach, and the set of exposures shall be assumed to remain constant.
Določitev učinka na zneske tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti se nanaša samo na učinek spremembe pristopa IRB, za sklop izpostavljenosti pa se predpostavlja, da ostanejo nespremenjene.
For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c)(ii) of this Article, and in accordance with Article 3(2), the impact of the change shall be assessed as a ratio calculated as follows:
Za namene odstavka (1)(c)(ii) tega člena in v skladu s členom 3(2) se učinek spremembe oceni kot razmerje, ki se izračuna na naslednji način:
in the numerator, the difference in the risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit and dilution risk associated with the range of application of the internal rating system or the internal models approach to equity exposures before and after the change;
v števcu se uporabi razlika v zneskih tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti za kreditno tveganje in tveganje zmanjšanja vrednosti odkupljenih denarnih terjatev, ki je povezana z obsegom uporabe notranjega bonitetnega sistema ali pristopa notranjih modelov za izpostavljenosti iz naslova lastniških instrumentov pred spremembo ali po njej;
in the denominator, the risk-weighted exposure amounts for credit and dilution risk before the change associated with the range of application of the rating system or the internal models approach to equity exposures.
v imenovalcu se uporabijo zneski tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti za kreditno tveganje in tveganje zmanjšanja vrednosti odkupljenih denarnih terjatev pred spremembo, ki je povezana z obsegom uporabe bonitetnega sistema ali pristopa notranjih modelov za izpostavljenosti iz naslova lastniških instrumentov.
The determination of the impact on risk-weighted exposure amounts shall refer only to impact of the change to the IRB approach, and the set of exposures shall be assumed to remain constant.
Določitev učinka na zneske tveganju prilagojenih izpostavljenosti se nanaša samo na učinek spremembe pristopa IRB, za sklop izpostavljenosti pa se predpostavlja, da ostanejo nespremenjene.