natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is necessary to ensure that measuring instruments from third countries entering the Union market comply with this Directive, and in particular that the appropriate conformity assessment procedures have been carried out by manufacturers with regard to those measuring instruments.
Nujno je treba zagotoviti, da so merilni instrumenti iz tretjih držav, ki vstopajo na trg Unije, skladni s to direktivo, zlasti pa je treba zagotoviti, da so proizvajalci izvedli ustrezne postopke ugotavljanja skladnosti navedenih merilnih instrumentov.
Provision should therefore be made for importers to make sure that the measuring instruments they place on the market comply with the requirements of this Directive and that they do not place on the market measuring instruments which do not comply with such requirements or present a risk.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti, da morajo uvozniki zagotoviti, da so merilni instrumenti, ki jih dajejo na trg, skladni z zahtevami iz te direktive, in da na trg ne dajejo merilnih instrumentov, ki niso skladni s temi zahtevami ali pomenijo tveganje.
Provision should also be made for importers to make sure that conformity assessment procedures have been carried out and that marking of measuring instruments and documentation drawn up by manufacturers are available for inspection by the competent national authorities.
Določiti bi bilo treba tudi, da morajo uvozniki zagotoviti, da so bili opravljeni postopki ugotavljanja skladnosti ter da je označevanje merilnih instrumentov in dokumentacija, ki jo pripravijo proizvajalci, na voljo pristojnim nacionalnim organom za kontrolo.
When placing a measuring instrument on the market, every importer should indicate on the measuring instrument his name, registered trade name or registered trade mark and the postal address at which he can be contacted.
Ko daje uvoznik merilni instrument na trg, bi moral na njem navesti svoje ime, registrirano trgovsko ime ali registrirano blagovno znamko in poštni naslov, na katerem je dosegljiv.
Exceptions should be provided for in cases where the size or nature of the measuring instrument does not allow it.
Določiti bi bilo treba izjeme v primerih, v katerih velikost ali narava merilnega instrumenta tega ne omogočata.
This includes cases where the importer would have to open the packaging to put his name and address on the measuring instrument.
To vključuje primere, v katerih bi moral uvoznik odpreti ovitek, da bi lahko na merilnem instrumentu navedel svoje ime in naslov.
The distributor makes a measuring instrument available on the market after it has been placed on the market by the manufacturer or the importer.
Distributer omogoča dostopnost merilnega instrumenta na trgu, potem ko ga da na trg proizvajalec ali uvoznik.
The distributor should act with due care to ensure that its handling of the measuring instrument does not adversely affect the compliance of that instrument with this Directive.
Distributer bi moral delovati skrbno in zagotoviti, da njegovo ravnanje z merilnim instrumentom ne vpliva negativno na skladnost tega instrumenta s to direktivo.
Any economic operator that either places a measuring instrument on the market under his own name or trade mark or modifies a measuring instrument in such a way that compliance with of this Directive may be affected should be considered to be the manufacturer and should assume the obligations of the manufacturer.
Vsak gospodarski subjekt, ki da merilni instrument na trg pod svojim imenom ali blagovno znamko ali ga spremeni na način, da vpliva na skladnost s to direktivo, bi bilo treba šteti za proizvajalca in bi moral prevzeti obveznosti proizvajalca.
Distributors and importers, being close to the market place, should be involved in market surveillance tasks carried out by competent national authorities, and should be prepared to participate actively, providing those authorities with all necessary information relating to the measuring instrument concerned.
Distributerji in uvozniki, ki so blizu trga, bi morali biti vključeni v naloge nadzora trga, ki jih izvajajo pristojni nacionalni organi, in bi morali biti pripravljeni na dejavno udeležbo ter navedenim organom zagotavljati vse potrebne informacije v zvezi z zadevnim merilnim instrumentom.
Ensuring traceability of a measuring instrument throughout the whole supply chain helps to make market surveillance simpler and more efficient.
Zagotavljanje sledljivosti merilnega instrumenta po vsej dobavni verigi prispeva k preprostejšemu in učinkovitejšemu nadzoru trga.
An efficient traceability system facilitates market surveillance authorities’ task of tracing economic operators who made non-compliant measuring instruments available on the market.
Učinkovit sistem sledljivosti organom za nadzor trga olajša njihovo nalogo, in sicer izslediti gospodarski subjekt, ki je omogočil dostopnost neskladnih merilnih instrumentov na trgu.
When keeping the information required under this Directive for the identification of other economic operators, economic operators should not be required to update such information in respect of other economic operators who have either supplied them with a measuring instrument or to whom they have supplied a measuring instrument.
Od gospodarskih subjektov ne bi smeli zahtevati, da pri hranjenju informacij za identifikacijo drugih gospodarskih subjektov, ki jih zahteva ta direktiva, posodabljajo informacije o gospodarskih subjektih, ki so jim dobavili merilni instrument ali katerim so tak merilni instrument dobavili.
This Directive should be limited to the expression of essential requirements that do not impede technical progress, preferably performance requirements.
Ta direktiva bi morala biti omejena na določitev bistvenih zahtev, ki ne ovirajo tehničnega napredka, predvsem zahteve za delovanje.
In order to facilitate conformity assessment with those requirements it is necessary to provide for a presumption of conformity for measuring instruments which are in conformity with harmonised standards that are adopted in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European Standardisation [8] for the purpose of expressing detailed technical specifications of those requirements.
Da se olajša ugotavljanje skladnosti s temi zahtevami, je treba določiti domnevo skladnosti za merilne instrumente, ki so skladni s harmoniziranimi standardi, sprejetimi v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1025/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o evropski standardizaciji [8], za navajanje podrobnih tehničnih specifikacij navedenih zahtev.
The technical and performance specifications of internationally agreed normative documents may also comply, in part or in full, with the essential requirements laid down by this Directive.
Tehnične specifikacije in specifikacije delovanja mednarodno dogovorjenih normativnih dokumentov se lahko, deloma ali v celoti, uskladijo z bistvenimi zahtevami iz te direktive.
In those cases the use of these internationally agreed normative documents should be allowed as an alternative to the use of harmonised standards and, under specific conditions, give rise to a presumption of conformity.
V takih primerih bi bilo treba omogočiti uporabo teh mednarodno dogovorjenih normativnih dokumentov kot drugo možnost za uporabo harmoniziranih standardov in, pod posebnimi pogoji, iz nje lahko izhaja domneva o skladnosti.
Conformity with the essential requirements laid down by this Directive can also be provided by specifications that are not supplied by a harmonised standard or an internationally agreed normative document.
Skladnost z bistvenimi zahtevami iz te direktive se lahko zagotovi tudi s specifikacijami, ki jih ni v harmoniziranem standardu ali mednarodno dogovorjenem normativnem dokumentu.
The use of harmonised standards or internationally agreed normative documents should therefore be optional.
Uporaba harmoniziranih standardov ali mednarodno dogovorjenih normativnih dokumentov bi morala zato biti neobvezna.
In order to enable economic operators to demonstrate and the competent authorities to ensure that measuring instruments made available on the market comply with the essential requirements, it is necessary to provide for conformity assessment procedures.
Zato da lahko gospodarski subjekti dokažejo in pristojni organi zagotovijo, da merilni instrumenti, ki so dostopni na trgu, izpolnjujejo bistvene zahteve, je treba določiti postopke ugotavljanja skladnosti.
Decision No 768/2008/EC establishes modules for conformity assessment procedures, from the least to the most stringent, in proportion to the level of risk involved and the level of safety required.
Sklep št. 768/2008/ES določa module za postopke ugotavljanja skladnosti od najmanj do najbolj zahtevnega, sorazmerno s stopnjo tveganja in stopnjo zahtevane varnosti.
In order to ensure inter-sectoral coherence and to avoid ad-hoc variants, conformity assessment procedures should be chosen from among those modules.
Za zagotovitev medsektorske skladnosti in preprečitev ad hoc različice bi bilo treba izbrati postopke ugotavljanja skladnosti med navedenimi moduli.
However, it is necessary to adapt those modules in order to reflect specific aspects of metrological control.
Vendar je treba te module spremeniti, da se odrazijo posebni vidiki meroslovnega nadzora.
The conformity assessment of sub-assemblies should be carried out in accordance with this Directive.
Ugotavljanje skladnosti podsestavov bi bilo treba izvesti v skladu s to direktivo.
If sub-assemblies are made available on the market separately and independently of an instrument, their conformity assessment should be undertaken independently of the instrument concerned.
Če so podsestavi na voljo na trgu ločeno in neodvisno od instrumenta, bi bilo treba njihovo ugotavljanje skladnosti opraviti neodvisno od zadevnega instrumenta.
The state of the art in measurement technology is subject to constant evolution which may lead to changes in the needs for conformity assessments.
V merilni tehnologiji nenehno prihaja do novih dosežkov, kar lahko povzroči spremembe potreb v zvezi z ugotavljanjem skladnosti.
Therefore, for each category of measuring instrument and, where appropriate, sub-assemblies, there should be an appropriate procedure or a choice between different procedures of equivalent stringency.
Zato bi moral za vsako kategorijo merilnih instrumentov in, če je to primerno, za vse podsestave obstajati ustrezni postopek ali izbira med različnimi postopki, ki so enako strogi.
Manufacturers should draw up an EU declaration of conformity to provide information required under this Directive on the conformity of a measuring instrument with this Directive and with other relevant Union harmonisation legislation.
Proizvajalci bi morali pripraviti izjavo EU o skladnosti, da se zagotovijo informacije, ki jih zahteva ta direktiva, o skladnosti merilnega instrumenta s to direktivo in drugo ustrezno zakonodajo Unije o harmonizaciji.
The CE marking and the supplementary metrology marking, indicating the conformity of a measuring instrument, are the visible consequence of a whole process comprising conformity assessment in a broad sense.
Oznaka CE in dodatna meroslovna oznaka, ki označujeta skladnost merilnega instrumenta, sta vidna posledica celotnega procesa, ki obsega ugotavljanje skladnosti v širšem pomenu.
In order to take account of differences in climatic conditions or of different levels of consumer protection that may apply at national level, it is necessary to establish environmental or accuracy classes as essential requirements.
Zaradi upoštevanja razlik v podnebnih razmerah ali različnih ravni zaščite potrošnikov, ki se mogoče uporabljajo na nacionalni ravni, je nujno določiti okoljske razrede in razrede točnosti kot bistvene zahteve.
Certain conformity assessment procedures set out in this Directive require the intervention of conformity assessment bodies, which are notified by the Member States to the Commission.
V nekaterih postopkih ugotavljanja skladnosti iz te direktive je potrebno posredovanje organov za ugotavljanje skladnosti, ki jih države članice priglasijo Komisiji.
Experience has shown that the criteria set out in Directive 2004/22/EC that conformity assessment bodies have to fulfil to be notified to the Commission are not sufficient to ensure a uniformly high level of performance of notified bodies throughout the Union.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da merila iz Direktive 2004/22/ES, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati organi za ugotavljanje skladnosti, da se priglasijo Komisiji, ne zadostujejo za zagotovitev enako visoke stopnje učinkovitosti priglašenih organov po vsej Uniji.
If a conformity assessment body demonstrates conformity with the criteria laid down in harmonised standards it should be presumed to comply with the corresponding requirements set out in this Directive.
Kadar organ za ugotavljanje skladnosti dokaže skladnost z merili, določenimi v zadevnih harmoniziranih standardih, se domneva, da izpolnjuje zadevne zahteve iz te direktive.
In order to ensure a consistent level of quality in the performance of conformity assessment of measuring instruments, it is also necessary to set requirements for notifying authorities and other bodies involved in the assessment, notification and monitoring of notified bodies.
Za zagotovitev dosledne ravni kakovosti ugotavljanja skladnosti merilnih instrumentov je prav tako treba določiti zahteve za priglasitvene organe in druge organe, vključene v ugotavljanje skladnosti, priglasitev in monitoring priglašenih organov.
In order to safeguard the level of protection required for the measuring instruments to be placed on the market, it is essential that conformity assessment subcontractors and subsidiaries fulfil the same requirements as notified bodies in relation to the performance of conformity assessment tasks.
Za ohranitev zahtevane varnostne ravni za merilne instrumente, ki so dani na trg, je za izvajanje nalog ugotavljanja skladnosti bistveno, da podizvajalci in odvisne družbe za ugotavljanje skladnosti izpolnjujejo iste zahteve kot priglašeni organi.
Therefore, it is important that the assessment of the competence and the performance of bodies to be notified and the monitoring of bodies already notified cover also activities carried out by subcontractors and subsidiaries.
Zato je pomembno, da ugotavljanje usposobljenosti in delovanja organov, ki bodo priglašeni, ter monitoring organov, ki so že bili priglašeni, vključuje tudi dejavnosti podizvajalcev in odvisnih družb.
In order to ensure legal certainty, it is necessary to clarify that rules on Union market surveillance and control of products entering the Union market provided for in Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 apply to measuring instruments covered by this Directive.
Za zagotovitev pravne varnosti je treba pojasniti, da se pravila iz Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008 o nadzoru trga Unije in o nadzoru proizvodov, danih na trg Unije uporabljajo za merilne instrumente, ki jih zajema ta direktiva.
Member States should take all appropriate measures to ensure that measuring instruments may be placed on the market only if, when properly stored and used for their intended purpose, or under conditions of use which can be reasonably foreseen, they do not endanger the health and safety of persons.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti vse ustrezne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovijo, da se lahko merilni instrumenti dajo na trg le, če pri ustreznem skladiščenju in uporabi za predviden namen ali v pogojih uporabe, ki jih je mogoče razumno predvideti, ne ogrožajo zdravja in varnosti ljudi.
Measuring instruments should be considered as non-compliant with the essential requirements laid down in this Directive only under conditions of use which can be reasonably foreseen, that is when such use could result from lawful and readily predictable human behaviour.
Za merilne instrumente bi bilo treba šteti, da ne izpolnjujejo bistvenih zahtev iz te direktive le v pogojih uporabe, ki jih je mogoče razumno predvideti, to je ko njihova uporaba sledi iz zakonitega in lahko predvidljivega človekovega ravnanja.
Directive 2004/22/EC already provides for a safeguard procedure allowing the Commission to examine the justification for a measure taken by a Member State against measuring instruments it considers to be non-compliant.
Direktiva 2004/22/ES že določa zaščitni postopek, ki Komisiji omogoča preučitev upravičenosti ukrepa, ki ga države članice izvajajo zoper merilne instrumente, za katere menijo, da niso skladne.
In order to increase transparency and to reduce processing time, it is necessary to improve the existing safeguard procedure, with the view to making it more efficient and drawing on the expertise available in Member States.
Da bi se povečala preglednost in skrajšal čas postopka, je treba obstoječi zaščitni postopek izboljšati v smeri povečanja njegove učinkovitosti in črpanja iz obstoječih izkušenj držav članic.
The existing system should be supplemented by a procedure under which interested parties are informed of measures intended to be taken with regard to measuring instruments presenting a risk to aspects of public interest protection covered by this Directive.
Obstoječi sistem bi bilo treba dopolniti s postopkom, ki omogoča zainteresiranim stranem, da so obveščene o ukrepih, ki se nameravajo izvajati glede merilnih instrumentov, ki predstavljajo tveganje za javne interese, ki jih zajema ta direktiva.
It should also allow market surveillance authorities, in cooperation with the relevant economic operators, to act at an early stage in respect of such measuring instruments.
Organom za nadzor trga bi tudi moral omogočati, da v sodelovanju z ustreznimi gospodarskimi subjekti glede takih merilnih instrumentov ukrepajo v zgodnejši fazi.
Where the Member States and the Commission agree as to the justification of a measure taken by a Member State, no further involvement of the Commission should be required, except where non-compliance can be attributed to shortcomings of a harmonised standard or a normative document.
Kadar se države članice in Komisija dogovorijo glede upravičenosti ukrepa, ki ga izvaja država članica, nadaljnje sodelovanje Komisije ne bi smelo biti potrebno, razen v primerih, kjer je neskladnost posledica pomanjkljivosti harmoniziranega standarda ali normativnega dokumenta.
Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers [9].
Ta pooblastila bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države članice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije [9].
The advisory procedure should also be used for the adoption of implementing acts with respect to the objections to the internationally agreed normative documents whose references have not yet been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, given that the relevant document has not yet led to the presumption of conformity with the applicable essential requirements.
Svetovalni postopek bi bilo prav tako treba uporabiti za sprejetje izvedbenih aktov glede pripomb k mednarodno sprejetim normativnim dokumentom, katerih sklicevanja še niso bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, glede na to, da relevanten dokument še ni vodil do domneve o skladnosti z veljavnimi bistvenimi zahtevami.
The examination procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts with respect to the objections to the internationally agreed normative documents whose references were already published in the Official Journal of the European Union and which a Member State or the Commission considers justified, given that such acts could have consequences on the presumption of conformity with the applicable essential requirements.
Postopek pregleda bi bilo treba uporabiti za sprejetje izvedbenih aktov glede pripomb k mednarodno sprejetim normativnim dokumentom, katerih sklicevanja so že bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in za katere država članica ali Komisija meni, da so upravičeni, glede na to, da lahko taki akti vplivajo na domnevo o skladnosti z veljavnimi bistvenimi zahtevami.
The examination procedure should also be used for the adoption of implementing acts with respect to compliant measuring instruments which present a risk to the health or safety of persons or to other aspects of public interest protection.
Postopek pregleda bi bilo treba uporabiti tudi za sprejetje izvedbenih aktov v zvezi s skladnimi merilnimi instrumenti, ki predstavljajo tveganje za zdravje ali varnost ljudi ali druge vidike varovanja javnega interesa.
The Commission should, by means of implementing acts and, given their special nature, acting without the application of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, determine whether measures taken by Member States in respect of non-compliant measuring instruments are justified or not.
Komisija bi morala z izvedbenimi akti in glede na njihov poseben značaj brez uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011 določiti, ali so ukrepi, ki so jih države članice sprejele v zvezi z neskladnimi merilnimi instrumenti, upravičeni ali ne.
In order to take into account the developments in the measurement technology, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to the instrument-specific Annexes.
Da se upošteva razvoj v merilni tehnologiji, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastila, da v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije sprejme akte v zvezi s spremembami prilog o posameznih instrumentih.
Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of national law adopted pursuant to this Directive and ensure that those rules are enforced.
Države članice bi morale določiti pravila o kaznih, ki se uporabljajo za kršitve določb nacionalnega prava, sprejetih v skladu s to direktivo, in zagotoviti, da se ta pravila izvršujejo.
It is necessary to provide for reasonable transitional arrangements that allow the making available on the market and putting into use, without the need to comply with further product requirements, of measuring instruments that have already been placed on the market in accordance with Directive 2004/22/EC before the date of application of national measures transposing this Directive.
Določiti je treba razumno prehodno ureditev, ki bo omogočala dostopnost na trgu in dajanje v uporabo, brez izpolnjevanja dodatnih zahtev, merilnih instrumentov“ ki so bili že dani na trg v skladu z Direktivo 2004/22/ES pred datumom uporabe nacionalnih ukrepov za prenos te direktive.
Distributors should therefore be able to supply measuring instruments that have been placed on the market, namely stock that is already in the distribution chain, before the date of application of national measures transposing this Directive.
Distributerji bi zato morali imeti možnost dobavljati merilne instrumente, ki so že bili dani na trg, to je zalogo, ki je že v distribucijski verigi pred datumom uporabe nacionalnih predpisov, ki prenašajo to direktivo.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to ensure that measuring instruments on the market fulfil the requirements providing for a high level of protection of the public interests covered by this Directive while guaranteeing the functioning of the internal market cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer zagotovitve, da merilni instrumenti na trgu izpolnjujejo zahteve, s katerimi se omogoča visoka raven varovanja javnih interesov, ki jih zajema ta direktiva, in hkrati zagotavlja delovanje notranjega trga, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi obsega in učinkov predlaganega ukrepa lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.