natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The competent authorities may also grant, under such terms and conditions as they deem appropriate, an authorisation for a transaction in relation to the activities referred to in Article 4a(1), provided that the transaction is for the purpose of maintenance in order to ensure safety of existing infrastructure.
Pristojni organi lahko izdajo tudi dovoljenje v zvezi z blagom in tehnologijo iz člena 4b(1) in dejavnostmi iz člena 4b(2) ter člena 4c, kadar je prodaja, dobava, prenos ali izvoz predmetov ali opravljanje navedenih dejavnosti potrebno za nujno preprečitev ali ublažitev dogodka, ki bi lahko imel resne in obsežne posledice za zdravje in varnost ljudi, vključno z varnostjo obstoječe infrastrukture, ali za okolje.
The competent authorities may also grant an authorisation in relation to the goods and technology referred to in Article 4b(1) and to the activities referred to in Article 4b(2) and Article 4c, where the sale, supply, transfer or export of the items or the carrying out of those activities is necessary for the urgent prevention or mitigation of an event likely to have a serious and significant impact on human health and safety, including the safety of existing infrastructure, or the environment.
V ustrezno utemeljenih nujnih primerih se lahko prodaja, dobava, prenos ali izvoz izvede brez predhodnega dovoljenja, pod pogojem, da izvoznik pristojni organ o tem uradno obvesti v petih delovnih dneh od opravljene prodaje, dobave, prenosa ali izvoza ter pri tem navede podrobnosti ustrezne utemeljitve za prodajo, dobavo, prenos ali izvoz brez predhodnega dovoljenja.
In duly justified cases of emergency, the sale, supply, transfer or export may proceed without prior authorisation provided that the exporter notifies the competent authority within five working days after the sale, supply, transfer or export has taken place, providing detail about the relevant justification for the sale, supply, transfer or export without prior authorisation.
Komisija in države članice druga drugo obveščajo o ukrepih iz tega odstavka in si posredujejo vse druge zadevne informacije, ki so jim na voljo.
The Commission and the Members States shall inform each other of the measures taken under this paragraph and share any other relevant information at their disposal.
Člen 4e
Article 4e
Prepovedano je opravljanje storitev, neposredno povezanih s turizmom, na Krimu ali v Sevastopolu, in sicer s strani državljanov držav članic ali z ozemelj držav članic ali z uporabo plovil ali zrakoplovov pod pristojnostjo držav članic.
It shall be prohibited to provide services directly related to tourism activities in Crimea or Sevastopol, by nationals of Member States, or from the territories of Member States, or using vessels or aircraft under the jurisdiction of Member States.
Nobeni ladji, ki opravlja storitve križarjenja, ni dovoljen vstop ali pristanek v katerem koli pristanišču na Krimskem polotoku.
It shall be prohibited for any ship providing cruise services, to enter into or call at any port situated in the Crimean Peninsula.
Unija sprejme potrebne ukrepe za določitev zadevnih pristanišč, za katere se uporablja ta člen.
The Union shall take the necessary measures in order to determine the relevant ports to be covered by this paragraph.
Prepoved iz odstavka 2 ne velja, če ladja v nujnih primerih zaradi pomorske varnosti vstopi ali pristane v enem od pristanišč na Krimskem polotoku.
The prohibition in paragraph 2 shall not apply when a ship enters or calls at one of the ports situated in the Crimean Peninsula for reasons of maritime safety in cases of emergency.
Pristojni organ mora biti o vstopu ali pristanku ladje v pristanišče obveščen v petih delovnih dneh.
The competent authority shall be informed of the relevant entry into or call at the port within five working days.
Prepovedi iz odstavka 1 do 21. marca 2015 ne posegajo v izvrševanje pogodb, sklenjenih pred 20. decembrom 2014, ali povezanih pogodb, potrebnih za izvršitev takšnih pogodb.
The prohibitions set out in paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to the execution, until 21 March 2015, of contracts concluded before 20 December 2014, or ancillary contracts necessary for the execution of such contracts.
Prepovedano je zavestno ali namerno sodelovanje v dejavnostih, katerih namen ali učinek je izogniti se prepovedim iz odstavka 1.“
It shall be prohibited to participate, knowingly or intentionally, in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent the prohibitions referred to in paragraph 1.’
Člena 4f in 4g se črtata.
Articles 4f and 4g are deleted.
Člen 2
Article 2
Ta sklep začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 18. decembra 2014
Done at Brussels, 18 December 2014.
Za Svet
The President
UL L 183, 24.6.2014, str. 70.
on the withdrawal from the Official Journal of the European Union of the reference of standard EN 13525:2005+A2:2009 on Wood chippers under Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o umiku sklica na standard EN 13525:2005+A2:2009 o sekalnikih v skladu z Direktivo 2006/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta iz Uradnega lista Evropske unije
(notified under document C(2014) 9507)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 9507)
Having regard to the Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC [1], and in particular Article 10 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2006 o strojih in spremembah Direktive 95/16/ES [1] ter zlasti člena 10 Direktive,
Having regard to the opinion of the committee established by Article 22 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on European standardisation, amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2],
ob upoštevanju mnenja odbora, ustanovljenega na podlagi člena 22 Uredbe (EU) št. 1025/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o evropski standardizaciji, spremembi direktiv Sveta 89/686/EGS in 93/15/EGS ter direktiv 94/9/ES, 94/25/ES, 95/16/ES, 97/23/ES, 98/34/ES, 2004/22/ES, 2007/23/ES, 2009/23/ES in 2009/105/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter razveljavitvi Sklepa Sveta 87/95/EGS in Sklepa št. 1673/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2],
Where a national standard transposing a harmonised standard, the reference of which has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, covers one or more essential health and safety requirements set out in Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC, the machine built in accordance with this standard is presumed to meet the essential health and safety requirements concerned.
Kadar nacionalni standard, ki prenaša usklajeni standard, na katerega je bil sklic objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, zajema eno ali več bistvenih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtev, določenih v Prilogi I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES, se za stroj, izdelan v skladu s tem standardom, domneva, da izpolnjuje zadevne bistvene zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve.
In July 2012, France lodged a formal objection in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 2006/42/EC in respect of standard EN 13525:2005+A2:2009 ‘Forestry machinery — Wood chippers — Safety’ proposed by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) to be harmonised under Directive 2006/42/EC.
Francija je julija 2012 vložila uradni ugovor v skladu s členom 10 Direktive 2006/42/ES zoper standard EN 13525:2005+A2:2009 „Gozdarski stroji – sekalniki – varnost“, ki ga je Evropski odbor za standardizacijo predlagal za harmonizacijo v skladu z Direktivo 2006/42/ES.
The standard supersedes the previous version EN 13525:2005+A1:2007, the reference of which was first published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 6 November 2007 [3].
Standard nadomešča prejšnjo verzijo standarda EN 13525:2005+A1:2007, sklic na katerega je bil v Uradnem listu Evropske unije prvič objavljen 6. novembra 2007 [3].
The formal objection is based on the failure of the provisions 4.2.4 Infeed stop control and 4.3.3 Hazards related to infeed components and chipping components of the standard, to sufficiently cover the essential health and safety requirements laid down in Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC, since it does not take properly into account the possibility that the operators can be caught up in and pulled towards dangerous moving parts of the machine, without being able to activate the emergency stop function.
Uradni ugovor temelji na ugotovitvi, da določbi standarda 4.2.4 Nadzor ustavitve dovajanja (Infeed stop control) in 4.3.3 Nevarnosti v zvezi z deli za dovajanje in deli za sekanje (Hazards related to infeed components and chipping components) bistvenih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtev iz Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES ne obravnavata ustrezno, ker ne upoštevata v zadostni meri možnosti, da bi se upravljavec lahko zataknil ob del stroja, ki bi ga nato potegnil proti nevarnim premikajočim se delom stroja, ne da bi upravljavec pri tem lahko aktiviral izklop v sili.
Having examined the standard EN 13525:2005+A2:2009 together with the representatives of the committee established by Article 22 of Directive 2006/42/EC, the Commission concluded that the standard fails to meet the essential health and safety requirements provided for in points 1.3.7 Risks related to moving parts and 1.3.8.2 Moving parts involved in the process of Annex I to Directive 2006/42/EC, for the reason that the machines designed to comply with those requirements present major risks for operators and third parties, fatal accidents having been already encountered.
Komisija je, potem ko je skupaj s predstavniki odbora, ustanovljenega v skladu s členom 22 Direktive 2006/42/ES, preučila standard EN 13525:2005+A2:2009, sklenila, da standard ne dosega bistvenih zdravstvenih in varnostnih zahtev iz točk 1.3.7 Tveganje, povezano z gibajočimi se deli in 1.3.8.2 Gibajoči se deli, vključeni v proces Priloge I k Direktivi 2006/42/ES, ker stroji, ki bi morali upoštevati te zahteve, predstavljajo veliko nevarnost za upravljavce in tretje strani, saj je že prišlo do nesreč s smrtnim izidom.
Taking into consideration the need to improve the safety aspects of the standard EN 13525:2005+A2:2009, the reference of that standard should be withdrawn from the Official Journal of the European Union,
Ker je varnostne vidike standarda EN 13525:2005+A2:2009 potrebno izboljšati, bi bilo treba sklic na ta standard umakniti iz Uradnega lista Evropske unije.
The reference of standard EN 13525:2005+A2:2009 ‘Forestry machinery — Wood chippers — Safety’ shall be withdrawn from the Official Journal of the European Union.
Sklicevanje na standard EN 13525: 2005 + A2:2009 „Gozdarski stroji – sekalniki – varnost“ se umakne iz Uradnega lista Evropske unije.
OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 24.
UL L 157, 9.6.2006, str. 24.
OJ C 264, 6.11.2007, p. 1.
UL C 264, 6.11.2007, str. 1.
on the recognition of Japan pursuant to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the systems for training and certification of seafarers
o priznanju Japonske v skladu z Direktivo 2008/106/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede sistemov za usposabljanje pomorščakov in izdajanje spričeval pomorščakom
(notified under document C(2014) 9590)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 9590)
Having regard to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on the minimum level of training of seafarers [1], and in particular Article 19(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2008/106/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. novembra 2008 o minimalni ravni izobraževanja pomorščakov [1] in zlasti člena 19(3) Direktive
Those third countries have to meet all the requirements of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 (STCW Convention), as amended.
Navedene tretje države morajo izpolnjevati vse zahteve Konvencije o standardih za usposabljanje, izdajanje spričeval in ladijsko stražarjenje pomorščakov Mednarodne pomorske organizacije (IMO) iz leta 1978 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Konvencija STCW), kakor je bila spremenjena.
By letter of 13 May 2005, the Republic of Cyprus requested the recognition of Japan.
Republika Ciper je z dopisom z dne 13. maja 2005 zahtevala priznanje Japonske.
Following this request, the Commission contacted the Japanese authorities with a view to carrying out an assessment of their training and certification system in order to verify whether Japan meets all the requirements of the STCW Convention and whether the appropriate measures have been taken to prevent fraud involving certificates.
Na podlagi tega zahtevka je Komisija vzpostavila stik z japonskimi organi, da bi ocenila njihov sistem za usposabljanje in izdajanje spričeval, s čimer bi preverila, ali Japonska izpolnjuje vse zahteve Konvencije STCW in ali so bili sprejeti ustrezni ukrepi za preprečevanje goljufij, povezanih s spričevali.
It was explained that the assessment would be based on the results of a fact finding inspection to be carried out by the experts of the European Maritime Safety Agency.
Pojasnjeno je bilo, da bo ocena temeljila na rezultatih inšpekcijskega pregleda za ugotavljanje dejstev, ki ga bodo opravili strokovnjaki Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost.
After lengthy discussions on the legal framework of the European Union, the Japanese authorities accepted an inspection mission by letter of 8 March 2011.
Po dolgotrajnih razpravah o pravnem okviru Evropske unije so japonski organi z dopisom z dne 8. marca 2011 sprejeli inšpekcijsko misijo.
The Commission then proceeded with the assessment of the training and certification system in Japan which was based on the results of an inspection carried out by experts of the European Maritime Safety Agency in February 2012 and on the response of 10 January 2014 of the Japanese authorities to a request of 25 October 2012 for a voluntary corrective action plan.
Komisija je nato začela oceno sistema za usposabljanje in izdajanje spričeval na Japonskem, ki je temeljila na rezultatih inšpekcijskega pregleda, ki so ga opravili strokovnjaki Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost v februarju 2012, in na odgovoru japonskih organov z dne 10. januarja 2014 na zahtevo z dne 25. oktobra 2012 za prostovoljni načrt korektivnih ukrepov.
The assessment did not reveal serious concerns though it identified some areas in need of attention.
Presoja ni razkrila resnih težav, je pa opredelila nekaj področij, ki jim je treba nameniti pozornost.
In particular, the quality standards system of the maritime administration and of the Maritime Education and Training Institutions did not cover some processes.
Zlasti je bilo ugotovljeno, da sistem standardov kakovosti pomorske uprave in ustanov za pomorsko izobraževanje in usposabljanje ne zajema nekaterih postopkov.
Also, the syllabi and the practical training established by the national standards did not ensure the achievement of some prescribed standards of competence for the ‘Life Saving’ and ‘Fire Fighting’ courses.
Poleg tega učni načrti in praktično usposabljanje, ki jih določajo nacionalni standardi, niso zagotovili uresničitve nekaterih predpisanih standardov usposobljenosti za programe „reševanja“ in „gašenja“.
The Japanese legislation allowed candidates for certification to complete the seagoing service on board ships below the tonnage or propulsion power limits corresponding to the certificate to be issued or on board fishing vessels or Coast Guard ships.
Japonska zakonodaja je kandidatom za pridobitev spričevala dovoljevala dokončanje dela na krovu ladij s tonažo ali močjo pogona, nižjo od mejnih vrednosti, ki ustrezajo spričevalu, ki ga je treba izdati, ali na krovu ribiških plovil ali ladij obalne straže.
In order to ensure that this type of seagoing service was relevant to the certificate applied for and that all relevant competences were achieved during the seagoing service, the administration applied certain criteria for the candidates that had completed 12 months of seagoing service as part of an approved training programme.
Da bi zagotovili, da je bila ta vrsta dela na ladji ustrezna za spričevalo, za katero se je zaprosilo, in da so bile med delom na ladji dosežene vse ustrezne usposobljenosti, je uprava uporabila nekatera merila za kandidate, ki so opravili 12 mesecev dela na ladji kot del odobrenega programa usposabljanja.
However, based on the analysis of the documentation provided by the Japanese authorities, it appeared that the administration did not ensure that this type of seagoing service was relevant to the certificate applied for and that all relevant competences were achieved during this seagoing service for the candidates who had completed 36 months of seagoing service.
Vendar se je po analizi dokumentacije, ki so jo predložili japonski organi, zdelo, da uprava ni poskrbela za to, da bi bila ta vrsta dela na ladjah ustrezna za spričevalo, za katero se je zaprosilo, in da bi bile za kandidate, ki so opravili 36-mesečno delo na ladjah, med tem delom dosežene vse ustrezne usposobljenosti.
Also, it appeared that the administration did not ensure that this type of seagoing service was relevant to the certificate applied for and that all relevant competences were achieved during this seagoing service for the revalidation and upgrade of certificates for all candidates.
Prav tako se je zdelo, da uprava ni poskrbela za to, da bi bila ta vrsta dela na ladjah ustrezna za spričevalo, za katero se je zaprosilo, in da bi bile med tem delom na ladji dosežene vse ustrezne usposobljenosti za podaljšanje in nadgradnjo spričeval za vse kandidate.
Lastly, the administration required candidates who have approved seagoing service of 12 months as part of an approved training programme to complete approved education in order to apply for certification at operational level.
Uprava je od kandidatov, ki so opravili 12 mesecev dela na ladji kot del odobrenega programa usposabljanja, zahtevala, naj dokončajo odobreno izobraževanje, da bi zaprosili za spričevalo na operativni ravni.
However, it appeared that the administration did not require candidates who have completed 36 months of seagoing service to also complete approved education in order to apply for certification at operational level.
Vendar se je zdelo, da uprava ni zahtevala, naj tudi kandidati, ki so opravili 36 mesecev dela na ladji, dokončajo odobreno izobraževanje, da bi zaprosili za spričevalo na operativni ravni.
By letter of 5 June 2014, the Commission invited the Japanese authorities to provide the necessary clarifications for the issues raised in the assessment supported by relevant documentation.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 5. junija 2014 pozvala japonske organe, naj zagotovijo potrebna pojasnila za vprašanja, ki so se pojavila pri oceni, podkrepljeni z ustrezno dokumentacijo.
On 4 August 2014 the Japanese authorities submitted their response.
Japonski organi so 4. avgusta 2014 predložili svoj odgovor.
In their response, the Japanese authorities provided documentation to demonstrate that all missing processes are now covered by a quality standards system.
V svojem odgovoru so predložili dokumentacijo, s katero so želeli dokazati, da so vsi manjkajoči postopki zdaj zajeti v sistem standardov kakovosti.
Also, they have drafted new legislation and they have upgraded their facilities to cover the missing standards in the ‘Life Saving’ and ‘Fire Fighting’ courses.
Poleg tega so pripravili novo zakonodajo in nadgradili svoje zmogljivosti za vključitev manjkajočih standardov v programe „reševanja“ in „gašenja“.
Regarding the verification by the administration that the seagoing service is relevant to the certificate applied for and that all relevant competences are achieved during the seagoing service for the candidates who had completed 36 months of seagoing service and those who applied for revalidation and upgrade of their certificates, the Japanese authorities argued that they apply criteria for certification, upgrading and revalidation relating to the ship's size, navigational area and capacity performed.
V zvezi s preverjanjem s strani uprave, da delo na ladji ustreza spričevalu, za katero se zaprosi, in da so kandidati, ki so zaključili 36-mesečno delo na ladji, ter tisti, ki so zaprosili za podaljšanje in nadgradnjo svojih spričeval, dosegli vse ustrezne usposobljenosti, so japonski organi navedli, da uporabljajo merila za izdajanje spričeval, podaljšanje in nadgradnjo, ki se nanašajo na ladijsko velikost, navigacijsko področje in zmogljivost.
However, the application of such criteria was not sufficiently demonstrated by the information provided.
Vendar predložene informacije niso zadostno dokazale uporabe takšnih meril.
Regarding the completion of approved education by candidates applying for certification at operational level who have completed 36 months of seagoing service, the Japanese authorities argued that they comply with the relevant requirements of the STCW Convention.
V zvezi z zaključkom odobrenega izobraževanja kandidatov, ki so zaprosili za izdajo spričevala na operativni ravni in ki so dopolnili 36-mesečno delo na ladji, so japonski organi navedli, da izpolnjuje ustrezne zahteve Konvencije STCW.
However, such compliance was not sufficiently demonstrated by the information provided.
Vendar predložene informacije niso zadostno dokazale izpolnjevanja teh zahtev.
Though the justifications as regards the last two points do not alleviate completely the concerns raised in the assessment, the overall level of compliance of Japan with STCW requirements on training and certification of seafarers is not called into question.
Čeprav utemeljitvi glede zadnjih dveh točk ne odpravljata povsem pomislekov, ki jih vzbuja ocena, splošna raven skladnosti Japonske z zahtevami Konvencije STCW glede usposabljanja pomorščakov in izdajanja spričeval pomorščakom ni vprašljiva.
The final outcome of the assessment demonstrates that Japan complies with the requirements of the STCW Convention, while this country has taken appropriate measures to prevent fraud involving certificates.
Končni rezultat ocene kaže, da Japonska izpolnjuje zahteve Konvencije STCW in da je sprejela ustrezne ukrepe za preprečevanje goljufij v zvezi s spričevali.
Member States were provided with a report on the results of the assessment.
Države članice so prejele poročilo o rezultatih ocene.
The measure provided for in this Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Safe Seas and the Prevention of Pollution from Ships,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za varnost na morju in preprečevanje onesnaževanja z ladij –
For the purposes of Article 19 of Directive 2008/106/EC, Japan is recognised as regards the systems for the training and certification of seafarers.
Japonska se prizna za namene člena 19 Direktive 2008/106/ES glede sistemov za usposabljanje pomorščakov in izdajanje spričeval pomorščakom.
OJ L 323, 3.12.2008, p. 33.
UL L 323, 3.12.2008, str. 33.
concerning certain protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N8 in Italy
o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z visoko patogeno aviarno influenco podtipa H5N8 v Italiji
(notified under document C(2014) 10143)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 10143)