natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The request was lodged by the Defence Committee of the Steel Butt-Welding Fittings Industry of the European Union (‘the applicant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 40 % of the total Union production of the product concerned.
Zahtevek je vložil Odbor za zaščito interesov industrije fitingov iz jekla za čelno varjenje Evropske unije („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 40 % celotne proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would likely result in recurrence of dumping and recurrence of injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi iztek veljavnosti ukrepov verjetno povzročil ponovitev dampinga in škode za industrijo Unije.
On 15 October 2013, the Commission initiated an expiry review under Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 15. oktobra 2013 začela pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
It published a Notice of Initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union [13].
Obvestilo o začetku tega pregleda je objavila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [13].
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission invited interested parties to contact it in order to participate in the review investigation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku zainteresirane strani pozvala, naj se ji javijo, da bi sodelovale v preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa.
The Commission specifically informed the applicant, other known Union producers, users and importers, exporting producers in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia, and the Korean and Malaysian authorities about the initiation of the expiry review and invited them to cooperate.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa posebej obvestila vložnika, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, uporabnike in uvoznike, proizvajalce izvoznike v Republiki Koreji in Maleziji ter korejske in malezijske organe in jih pozvala k sodelovanju.
All interested parties had the opportunity to comment on the initiation of the review and to request a hearing with the Commission and/or the Hearing Officer in trade proceedings.
Vse zainteresirane strani so imele možnost predložiti pripombe o začetku pregleda ter zahtevati, da jih zasliši Komisija in/ali pooblaščenec za zaslišanje v trgovinskih postopkih.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it might sample the Union producers, importers and Korean exporting producers, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da bo v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe morda izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije, uvoznikov in korejskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission stated that it had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers and invited interested parties to comment.
Komisija je v obvestilu o začetku navedla, da je začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije, in zainteresirane strani pozvala k predložitvi pripomb.
The sample was selected on the basis of production and sales volumes of the like product during the review investigation period (‘RIP’) in the Union whilst ensuring a geographical spread and was comprised of four Union producers or groups of Union producers (five individual companies) located in Germany, France, Italy, Romania and Austria.
Vzorec je bil izbran na podlagi obsega proizvodnje in prodaje podobnega izdelka med obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OPP“) v Uniji, tako da se je hkrati zagotovila zemljepisna porazdelitev, ter je obsegal štiri proizvajalce Unije ali koncerne Unije (pet posameznih družb) s sedežem v Nemčiji, Franciji, Italiji, Romuniji in Avstriji.
No comments were received and the provisionally selected companies were retained in the final sample.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb, so začasno izbrane družbe ostale v končnem vzorcu.
However, after the initiation of the proceeding the Commission had to exclude from the sample two Union producers due to a lack of cooperation.
Toda po začetku postopka je morala Komisija zaradi nesodelovanja iz vzorca izključiti dva proizvajalca Unije.
The two remaining companies/group of companies (three individual companies) represent 49 % of Union production and 45 % of Union sales and have production facilities in three different countries.
Preostali dve družbi/koncern (tri posamezne družbe) predstavljajo 49 % proizvodnje Unije in 45 % prodaje Unije ter imajo proizvodne obrate v treh različnih državah.
Therefore, the modified sample was still considered representative of the Union industry.
Zato se je spremenjeni vzorec še vedno obravnaval kot reprezentativen za industrijo Unijo.
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked unrelated importers to provide information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno in bi v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, je nepovezane uvoznike pozvala, naj ji pošljejo informacije iz obvestila o začetku.
However no importer cooperated with the investigation.
Vendar ni pri preiskavi sodeloval noben uvoznik.
Sampling of exporting producers in the Republic of Korea
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Republiki Koreji
To decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all exporting producers in Korea to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno in bi v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, je vse proizvajalce izvoznike v Koreji pozvala, naj ji pošljejo informacije iz obvestila o začetku.
In addition, the Commission requested the Mission of the Republic of Korea to the European Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Poleg tega je misijo Republike Koreje pri Evropski uniji prosila, naj opredeli druge proizvajalce izvoznike, če ti obstajajo, ki bi morda želeli sodelovati v preiskavi, in/ali naveže stik z njimi.
Two Korean exporting producers provided the requested information, but only one agreed to cooperate and be included in the sample.
Zahtevane informacije sta predložila dva korejska proizvajalca izvoznika, vendar se je le eden strinjal s sodelovanjem in vključitvijo v vzorec.
It was therefore decided that sampling of the Korean exporting producers was not necessary.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje korejskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni potrebno.
Exporting producers in Malaysia
Proizvajalci izvozniki v Maleziji
In view of the low number of known Malaysian exporting producers, the Commission did not foresee sampling in the Notice of Initiation.
Komisija zaradi majhnega števila znanih malezijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v obvestilu o začetku ni predvidela njihovega vzorčenja.
The Commission invited all exporting producers to make themselves known within 15 days after the publication of the Notice of Initiation.
Komisija je pozvala vse proizvajalce izvoznike, da se ji javijo v 15 dneh od datuma objave tega obvestila.
In addition, the Commission requested the Mission of Malaysia to the European Union to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Poleg tega je misijo Malezije pri Evropski uniji prosila, naj opredeli druge proizvajalce izvoznike, če ti obstajajo, ki bi morda želeli sodelovati v preiskavi, in/ali naveže stik z njimi.
Replies to questionnaire
Izpolnjeni vprašalniki
The Commission sent questionnaires to all sampled companies in the Union, the cooperating Korean company and all known Malaysian exporting producers.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem vzorčenim družbam v Uniji, sodelujoči korejski družbi in vsem znanim malezijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
One Union producer failed to respond to the questionnaire while another Union producer submitted only a partial answer and failed to reply after a deficiency letter had been sent.
Vprašalnika ni izpolnil eden od proizvajalcev Unije, medtem ko je drugi poslal le delno izpolnjen vprašalnik, na poziv k dopolnitvi pa ni odgovoril.
These two Union producers were subsequently excluded from the sample (see recital 15 above).
Oba proizvajalca Unije sta bila naknadno izključena iz vzorca (glej uvodno izjavo 15).
One Korean exporting producer replied to the questionnaire.
Vprašalnik je izpolnil en korejski proizvajalec izvoznik.
None of the Malaysian exporting producers submitted a reply to the questionnaire.
Vprašalnika ni izpolnil noben od malezijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for determining the likelihood of recurrence of dumping and resulting injury and for assessing whether the imposition of measures would be against the Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev verjetnosti ponovitve dampinga in posledične škode ter za oceno, ali bi bila uvedba ukrepov v nasprotju z interesom Unije.
Erne Fittings GmbH, Schlins Austria and the related company Siekman Fittings, Lohne, Germany,
Erne Fittings GmbH, Schlins, Avstrija, vključno s povezano družbo Siekman Fittings, Lohne, Nemčija,
Vallourec Fittings SA, France.
Vallourec Fittings S.A., Francija;
Exporting producers in the Republic of Korea:
proizvajalci izvozniki v Republiki Koreji:
The investigation of likelihood of recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 October 2012 to 30 September 2013 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava v zvezi z verjetnostjo ponovitve dampinga je zajemala obdobje od 1. oktobra 2012 do 30. septembra 2013 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2010 to the end of the review investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2010 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
On 12 September 2014, the Commission disclosed to all interested parties the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to maintain the anti-dumping measures in force and invited all interested parties to comment.
Komisija je 12. septembra 2014 vsem zainteresiranim stranem razkrila bistvena dejstva in premisleke, na podlagi katerih je nameravala ohraniti veljavne protidampinške ukrepe, ter vse zainteresirane strani pozvala k predložitvi pripomb.
The comments made by the interested parties were considered by the Commission and taken into account, where appropriate.
Komisija je proučila pripombe zainteresiranih strani in jih po potrebi upoštevala.
The product under review is tube and pipe fittings (other than cast fittings, flanges and threaded fittings), of iron or steel (not including stainless steel), with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 609,6 mm, of a kind used for butt-welding or other purposes, originating in the Republic of Korea and Malaysia, currently falling within CN codes ex73079311, ex73079319 and ex73079980 (‘the product concerned’ or TPF).
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, je pribor (fitingi) za cevi (razen litega pribora (fitingov), prirobnic in fitingov z navojem) iz železa ali jekla (razen nerjavnega jekla), z največjim zunanjim premerom do vključno 609,6 mm, ki se uporablja za čelno varjenje ali druge namene, s poreklom iz Republike Koreje in Malezije, trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex73079311, ex73079319 in ex73079980 („zadevni izdelek“).
The review investigation confirmed that, as in the original investigation, the TPF produced in the countries concerned, sold domestically and/or exported to the Union and/or other export markets, have the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics and end uses as the products sold in the Union by the Union industry.
V preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom se je tako kot v prvotni preiskavi pokazalo, da ima zadevni izdelek, proizveden v zadevnih državah, ki se prodaja na domačem trgu in/ali se izvaža v Unijo in/ali na druge izvozne trge, enake osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemične lastnosti ter končne uporabe kot izdelki, ki jih v Uniji prodajajo proizvajalci Unije.
The Commission decided that this product is therefore a like product within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija se je odločila, da se ta izdelek zato šteje za podoben izdelek v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether the expiry of the measures in force would be likely to lead to a recurrence of dumping from the countries concerned.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da bi zadevni državi zaradi izteka veljavnih ukrepov ponovili damping.
One of the largest Korean producers of TPF, TK Corporation, cooperated with the investigation.
V preiskavi je sodelovala ena od največjih korejskih proizvajalk zadevnega izdelka, tj. družba TK Corporation.
This cooperating company accounted for 25 %-40 % of Korean exports of TPF (the exact figure is not provided for reasons of confidentiality).
Izvoz te sodelujoče družbe je znašal 25–40 % korejskega izvoza zadevnega izdelka (natančen podatek ni naveden zaradi zaupnosti).
TK Corporation provided the Commission with a questionnaire reply including data on domestic and export sales and cost of production.
Družba TK Corporation je Komisiji poslala izpolnjen vprašalnik, v katerega je vključila podatke o domači prodaji in izvozu ter stroških proizvodnje.
The Commission considered that the analysis of Korean dumping during the RIP and parts of the recurrence analysis could be based on this company's data given its share of Korean exports of TPF.
Analiza korejskega dampinga v obdobju preiskave in deli analize o njegovi ponovitvi bi po mnenju Komisije lahko temeljili na podatkih te družbe, pri čemer se upošteva njen delež pri korejskem izvozu zadevnega izdelka.
The reply of TK Corporation was verified.
Odgovor družbe TK Corporation se je preveril.
Dumping of imports during the RIP
Damping uvoza v obdobju preiskave
In the RIP only negligible volumes of TPF (less than 50 tonnes) were imported into the Union from Korea.
V obdobju preiskave je bila iz Koreje v Unijo uvožena le zanemarljiva količina zadevnega izdelka (manj kot 50 ton).
Some of these sales were made by the sole cooperating exporting producer, TK Corporation.
Nekaj teh izdelkov je prodala edina sodelujoča proizvajalka izvoznica, tj. družba TK Corporation.
It was clear that these quantities were not representative as they represented less than 0,1 % of the production of TK Corporation.
Jasno je bilo, da te količine niso bile reprezentativne, saj niso presegle 0,1 % proizvodnje družbe TK Corporation.
In addition, it was unclear whether an anti-dumping duty had been paid on imports from the TK Corporation, which casts doubt on whether they had actually entered the Union customs territory.
Ni pa bilo jasno, ali je ta družba plačala protidampinško dajatev na uvoz, kar vzbuja dvom glede dejanskega vstopa uvoženih izdelkov na carinsko območje Unije.
Moreover, those sales were for three specific projects with their own specifications for fittings (therefore, an unrepresentative sale) and the sales were made as a ‘package’ with other fittings (mainly stainless steel).
Poleg tega je šlo za prodajo treh posebnih izdelkov z lastnimi specifikacijami za fitinge (torej za nereprezentativno prodajo), prodaja pa je bila opravljena v „paketu“ z drugimi fitingi (v glavnem nerjavno jeklo).
For the above reasons, no meaningful analysis of dumping based on imports of TPF from TK Corporation to the Union during the RIP could be made.
Zaradi navedenega ni bilo mogoče izdelati smiselne analize dampinga na podlagi uvoza zadevnega izdelka družbe TK Corporation v Unijo v OPP.
Following disclosure, TK Corporation submitted that the Commission should have based its dumping analysis on the Union export sales of the company, for the following reasons:
Po razkritju je družba TK Corporation trdila, da bi morala Komisija svojo analizo dampinga opreti na izvoz družbe v Unijo, in sicer iz naslednjih razlogov:
its export sales to the Union during the RIP were significant and therefore representative, as they consisted of ‘no less than 26 invoices with 282 individual transactions, despite duties being in place’;
izvoz družbe v Unijo v OPP je bil znaten in zato reprezentativen, saj je zajemal „ne manj kot 26 računov z 282 posameznimi transakcijami, in to kljub dajatvam“;
in the absence of clarity as concerns anti-dumping duty payment, some of the sales (destined for an offshore project) would not be subject to the anti-dumping duty, whereas for other sales that occurred during the RIP, anti-dumping duties were not always paid by importers as a result of misclassification of those products due to which the importers did not realise that anti-dumping duties were payable.
zaradi pomanjkanja jasnosti v zvezi s plačilom protidampinške dajatve naj določena prodaja (namenjena projektu na morju) ne bi bila predmet protidampinške dajatve, medtem ko v drugih primerih prodaje v OPP uvozniki niso vedno plačevali protidampinških dajatev, saj so bili izdelki napačno razvrščeni, zaradi česar uvozniki niso vedeli, da je treba protidampinške dajatve plačati.
In the meantime, importers were made aware of this error and they have since paid those anti-dumping duties retroactively;
Medtem pa so bili uvozniki opozorjeni na te napake in so protidampinške dajatve plačali za nazaj;
and (iii) the conditions for the export sales to the Union were normal as shorter delivery times were not applied nor were the prices charged subject to cross-compensation.
ter (iii) pogoji za izvoz v Unijo so bili običajni, saj se niso uporabljali kratki roki dobave in zaračunane cene niso bile predmet navzkrižne kompenzacije.
These comments were duly analysed.
Te pripombe so bile skrbno analizirane.
The low level of its export sales to the Union, in absolute terms as well as compared to the company's total production of the like product (being less than 0,1 %) was not contested by TK Corporation.
Družba TK Corporation ni izpodbijala svojega nizkega obsega izvoza v Unijo, tako v absolutnem smislu kot tudi v primerjavi s celotno proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka (manj kot 0,1 %).
The Commission maintains that such a very small volume in both relative and absolute terms does not qualify as being representative.
Komisija ohranja svoje stališče, da se tako majhna količina, v relativnem in absolutnem smislu, ne šteje za reprezentativno.
Furthermore, the Commission could not, on the basis of the provided documents, ascertain which part of TK Corporation's alleged Union sales had eventually been properly classified and imported and also the claim that the prices had not been subject to cross-compensation could not be verified and therefore could not be accepted as the supporting documents were only provided after the verification visit.
Poleg tega Komisija na podlagi predloženih dokumentov ni mogla ugotoviti, kateri del domnevne prodaje družbe TK Corporation v Unijo naj bi bil pravilno uvrščen in uvožen; tudi trditve, da cene niso bile predmet navzkrižne kompenzacije, ni bilo mogoče preveriti in posledično ne sprejeti, saj so bila s tem povezana dokazila predložena šele po preveritvenem obisku.
In any event, as concerns both issues, in view of the conclusion of the analysis under recital 34 above, there is no need for the Commission to make a final determination as even the total reported Union sales volumes of TK Corporation cannot be considered sufficiently representative.
V vsakem primeru pa glede obeh vprašanj, glede na sklep analize v uvodni izjavi 34, Komisiji ni treba predložiti končne ugotovitve, saj tudi skupnega navedenega obsega prodaje družbe TK Corporation v Unijo ni mogoče šteti za reprezentativnega.
The Commission therefore confirms that the Union sales of TK Corporation during the RIP cannot be used for a meaningful dumping analysis in the framework of this expiry review investigation.
Komisija zato potrjuje, da prodaje družbe TK Corporation v OPP ni mogoče uporabiti za smiselno analizo dampinga v okviru te preiskave v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa.
The Commission analysed whether there was a likelihood of recurrence of dumping should the measures lapse.
Komisija je proučila, ali obstaja verjetnost, da bi se v primeru prenehanja veljavnosti ukrepov damping ponovil.
When doing so, the following elements were analysed:
Pri tem je analizirala naslednje elemente:
export price to other destinations, the production capacity and spare capacity in Korea and the attractiveness of the Union market.
izvozno ceno v druge namembne države, proizvodno in prosto zmogljivost v Koreji ter privlačnost trga Unije.
Exports from Korea to other destinations
Izvoz iz Koreje v druge namembne kraje
Due to the small volume of imports of TPF from Korea to the Union, and the lack of reliability of the prices made for these sales (see recitals 32 to 36), the Commission concluded that data concerning sales of TPF from Korea to other countries should be used to assess the likely future level of export prices to the Union, should the measures be allowed to lapse.
Komisija je zaradi majhnega obsega uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Koreje v Unijo in nezanesljivih cen za to prodajo (glej uvodne izjave 32 do 36) ugotovila, da bi bilo treba v primeru prenehanja veljavnosti ukrepov pri oceni verjetne prihodnje ravni izvoznih cen v Unijo uporabiti podatke o prodaji zadevnega izdelka iz Koreje v druge države.
It was considered appropriate to first analyse Korean sales to the United States (‘US’) since, unlike any other Korean export destination, that market is of a similar size as the Union market, with many domestic producers but also with a large proportion of imports and low import tariff rates, making it a very competitive market.
Zdelo se je ustrezno, da se najprej analizira korejska prodaja v Združene države („ZDA“), saj je navedeni trg za razliko od vseh drugih korejskih izvoznih namembnih držav enake velikosti kot trg Unije ter ima številne domače proizvajalce pa tudi velik delež uvoza in nizke stopnje tarifnih kvot uvoza, zaradi česar je zelo konkurenčen.
Furthermore, the US is the major destination for exports from Korea in general and also for TK Corporation.
Razen tega so ZDA glavna namembna država za izvoz iz Koreje na splošno, pa tudi za družbo TK Corporation.
In addition, all other export sales of TPF from Korea were also examined during the investigation.
Med preiskavo je bil poleg tega proučen tudi ves drug izvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Koreje.
Dumping calculations were made for both US sales and sales to all other export destinations (excluding the Union for the reasons mentioned in recitals 32 to 36 above).
Opravljen je bil izračun dampinga za izvoz v ZDA in v vse druge namembne države (razen Unije zaradi razlogov, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah 32 do 36).
In accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation, the normal value for TK Corporation was based on the prices paid or payable, in the ordinary course of trade, by independent customers in its domestic market, when it is was possible to do so.
Normalna vrednost za družbo TK Corporation je v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe temeljila na cenah, ki so jih neodvisne stranke plačevale ali jih plačujejo v običajnem poteku trgovine na domačem trgu, kadar je to mogoče.
For the product types, which did not allow for this methodology, the normal value was constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Za vrste izdelka, ki ne dopuščajo te metodologije, se normalna vrednost konstruira v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
This was done on the basis of the actual cost of production of TK Corporation, as provided in the questionnaire reply, namely actual cost of manufacturing plus actual SGA and profit in accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
To se izračuna na osnovi dejanskih proizvodnih stroškov družbe TK Corporation, kot je navedeno v izpolnjenem vprašalniku, in sicer dejanskih stroškov proizvodnje, h katerim se doda dejanski znesek za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške ter za dobiček, v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe.