natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This can be the case for instance in sectors with regulated tariffs or where the operating risk is limited by means of contractual arrangements providing for partial compensation including compensation in the event of early termination of the concession for reasons attributable to the contracting authority or contracting entity or for reasons of force majeure.
To je na primer mogoče v sektorjih z reguliranimi tarifami ali kadar je operativno tveganje omejeno s pogodbeno ureditvijo, ki določa delno nadomestilo, tudi nadomestilo ob predčasni odpovedi koncesije zaradi razlogov, ki jih je mogoče pripisati javnemu naročniku ali naročniku, ali višje sile.
An operating risk should stem from factors which are outside the control of the parties.
Operativno tveganje bi moralo izhajati iz dejavnikov, na katere stranke nimajo vpliva.
Risks such as those linked to bad management, contractual defaults by the economic operator or to instances of force majeure are not decisive for the purpose of classification as a concession, since those risks are inherent in every contract, whether it be a public procurement contract or a concession.
Tveganja, kot so tveganja, povezana s slabim upravljanjem ali neizpolnjevanjem pogodbenih obveznosti gospodarskega subjekta ali višjo silo, niso odločilna pri uvrstitvi pogodbe med koncesije, saj so ta tveganja značilna za vse pogodbe, ne glede na to, ali gre za javno naročilo ali koncesijo.
An operating risk should be understood as the risk of exposure to the vagaries of the market, which may consist of either a demand risk or a supply risk, or both a demand and supply risk.
Operativno tveganje bi bilo treba razumeti kot tveganje, ki je posledica izpostavljenosti tržnim nepredvidljivostim in je povezano s povpraševanjem ali dobavo oziroma tako s povpraševanjem kot dobavo.
Demand risk is to be understood as the risk on actual demand for the works or services which are the object of the contract.
Tveganje, povezano s povpraševanjem, je tveganje glede dejanskega povpraševanja po gradnjah ali storitvah, ki so predmet pogodbe.
Supply risk is to be understood as the risk on the provision of the works or services which are the object of the contract, in particular the risk that the provision of the services will not match demand.
Tveganje, povezano z dobavo, je tveganje pri izvedbi gradnje ali opravljanju storitev, ki so predmet pogodbe, zlasti tveganje, da opravljene storitve ne bodo ustrezale povpraševanju.
For the purpose of assessment of the operating risk the net present value of all the investment, costs and revenues of the concessionaire should be taken into account in a consistent and uniform manner.
Pri oceni operativnega tveganja bi bilo treba dosledno in enotno upoštevati neto trenutno vrednost vseh naložb, stroškov in prihodkov koncesionarja.
It should therefore be clarified that a body which operates in normal market conditions, aims to make a profit, and bears the losses resulting from the exercise of its activity should not be considered to be a ‘body governed by public law’, since the needs in the general interest, that it has been set up to meet or been given the task of meeting, can be deemed to have an industrial or commercial character.
Zato bi bilo treba pojasniti, da se oseba, ki deluje v običajnih tržnih pogojih in si prizadeva za dobiček ter nosi izgube, ki izhajajo iz opravljanja njene dejavnosti, ne bi smela šteti za „osebo javnega prava“, saj se lahko šteje, da so potrebe splošnega interesa, za katerih izpolnjevanje je bila ustanovljena ali zadolžena, industrijske ali poslovne narave.
Similarly, the condition relating to the origin of the funding of the body considered, has also been examined by the Court, which has clarified that financed for ‘the most part’ means for more than half and that such financing may include payments from users which are imposed, calculated and collected in accordance with rules of public law.
Podobno je Sodišče preučilo tudi pogoj glede izvora financiranja zadevne osebe in pojasnilo, da financirati „večinoma“ pomeni več od polovice in da so lahko del takega financiranja plačila uporabnikov, ki so določena, izračunana in prejeta v skladu s pravili javnega prava.
It is appropriate to define ‘exclusive rights’ and ‘special rights’ as these notions are crucial to the scope of this Directive and the notion of contracting entities.
Primerno je opredeliti „izključne pravice“ in „posebne pravice“, saj je to ključnega pomena pri opredelitvi področja uporabe te direktive in pojma „naročniki“.
It should be clarified that entities which are neither contracting entities pursuant to point (a) of Article 7(1) nor public undertakings are subject to its provisions only to the extent that they exercise one of the activities covered on the basis of such rights.
V zvezi s slednjim bi bilo treba pojasniti, da za subjekte, ki niso naročniki iz točke (a) člena 7(1) ali javna podjetja, veljajo določbe te direktive samo, kolikor na podlagi teh pravic opravljajo eno od dejavnosti, ki spadajo v področje njene uporabe.
However, they will not be considered to be contracting entities if such rights have been granted by means of a procedure based on objective criteria, in particular pursuant to Union legislation, and for which adequate publicity has been ensured.
Vendar se ne bodo šteli kot naročniki, če so bile te pravice dodeljene po postopku, ki temelji na objektivnih merilih, zlasti v skladu z zakonodajo Unije, in v katerem je bilo zagotovljeno ustrezno obveščanje javnosti.
That legislation should include Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [7], Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [8], Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [9] and Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10].
Ta zakonodaja bi morala vključevati Direktivo 2009/73/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], Direktivo 2009/72/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7], Direktivo 97/67/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8], Direktivo 94/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9] ter Uredbo (ES) št. 1370/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [10].
It should also be clarified that that listing of legislation is not exhaustive and that rights in any form, which have been granted by means of other procedures based on objective criteria and for which adequate publicity has been ensured are not relevant for the purposes of determining the contracting entities covered by this Directive.
Prav tako bi bilo treba pojasniti, da ta seznam zakonodaje ni izčrpen in da pravice v kakršni koli obliki, ki so bile dodeljene po drugih postopkih na podlagi objektivnih meril in o katerih je bila javnost ustrezno obveščena, niso relevantne za določanje naročnikov, zajetih v tej direktivi.
This Directive should apply only to concession contracts whose value is equal to or greater than a certain threshold, which should reflect the clear cross-border interest of concessions to economic operators located in Member States other than that of the contracting authority or contracting entity.
Ta direktiva bi se morala uporabljati zgolj za koncesijske pogodbe, katerih vrednost je enaka ali višja od določene mejne vrednosti, ki bi morala biti taka, da bi bile koncesije očitno zanimive za gospodarske subjekte iz držav članic, ki niso države članice javnega naročnika ali naročnika.
Consequently, the method of calculating the estimated value of a concession needs to be set out, and should be identical for works and services concessions, as both contracts often cover elements of works and services.
Zato je treba določiti metodo izračuna ocenjene vrednosti koncesije, ki bi morala biti enaka za koncesije za gradnje in storitve, saj je večina pogodb mešanih.
The calculation should refer to the total turnover of the concessionaire in consideration of the works and services being the object of the concession, as estimated by the contracting authority or the contracting entity, excluding VAT, over the duration of the contract.
Nanašati bi se morala na celotni promet koncesionarja brez DDV med trajanjem pogodbe, ki ga oceni javni naročnik ali naročnik, kot nadomestilo za gradnje in storitve, ki so predmet koncesije.
To ensure a real opening up of the market and a fair balance in the application of concession award rules in the energy, transport and postal services sectors, it is necessary for the entities covered to be identified on a basis other than their legal status.
Za zagotovitev dejanskega odpiranja trga in pravičnega ravnotežja pri uporabi pravil o podeljevanju koncesij v energetskem in prometnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev je treba zajete subjekte opredeliti na drug način kot s sklicevanjem na njihov pravni status.
It should be ensured, therefore, that the equal treatment of contracting entities operating in the public sector and those operating in the private sector is not jeopardised.
Zato bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da se ohrani enako obravnavanje naročnikov iz javnega in zasebnega sektorja.
It is also necessary to ensure, in keeping with Article 345 TFEU, that the rules governing the system of property ownership in Member States are not prejudiced.
Prav tako je treba v skladu s členom 345 PDEU zagotoviti, da ni poseganja v lastninskopravno ureditev v državah članicah.
For this reason, specific and uniform rules should apply to concessions awarded by entities exercising one of the abovementioned activities for purposes of pursuing such activities, independently of whether they are state, local or regional authorities, bodies governed by public law, public undertakings or other entities enjoying special or exclusive rights.
Zato bi bilo treba uporabljati posebna in enotna pravila za koncesije, ki jih podelijo naročniki, ki opravljajo eno od navedenih dejavnosti, za izvedbo take dejavnosti, ne glede na to, ali so državni, lokalni ali regionalni organi, osebe javnega prava, javna podjetja ali druge osebe s posebnimi ali izključnimi pravicami.
Entities which are responsible, under national law, for the provision of services related to one of the activities referred to in Annex II, should be presumed to pursue such activities.
Treba bi bilo domnevati, da subjekti, ki so v skladu z nacionalnim pravom odgovorni za opravljanje storitev, povezanih z eno od dejavnosti iz Priloge II, te dejavnosti tudi izvajajo.
It should be clarified that the relevant activity in the field of airports also covers services provided to passengers which contribute to the smooth functioning of the airport facilities and which are expected of a well-functioning modern airport, such as retailing, public catering and car parking.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da ustrezna dejavnost na področju letališč zajema tudi storitve za potnike, ki prispevajo k nemotenemu delovanju letališke infrastrukture in bi jih dobro delujoče, sodobno letališče moralo zagotavljati, kot so maloprodaja, gostinske storitve in parkirišča.
Certain entities are active in the fields of production, transmission or distribution of both heat and cooling.
Nekateri naročniki so dejavni na področjih proizvodnje, prenosa ali distribucije toplote in hlajenja.
There may be some uncertainty as to which rules apply to respectively heat and cooling related activities.
Morda je nekoliko nejasno, katera pravila se uporabljajo za dejavnosti, povezane z ogrevanjem, in katera za dejavnosti, povezane s hlajenjem.
It should therefore be clarified that the transmission and/or distribution of heat is an activity covered by Annex II and thus entities which are active in the heating sector are subject to the rules of this Directive applicable to contracting entities in so far as they qualify as such.
Zato bi bilo treba pojasniti, da gre pri prenosu in/ali distribuciji toplote za dejavnost, zajeto v Prilogi II, in tako za subjekte, dejavne v sektorju ogrevanja, veljajo pravila te direktive, ki se uporabljajo za naročnike, kolikor jih lahko štejemo za naročnike.
On the other hand, entities operating in the cooling field are subject to the rules of this Directive applicable to contracting authorities in so far as they qualify as such.
Na drugi strani pa za subjekte, ki poslujejo v sektorju hlajenja, veljajo pravila te direktive, ki se uporabljajo za javne naročnike, kolikor jih lahko štejemo za javne naročnike.
It should finally be clarified that concessions awarded for the pursuit of both heating and cooling contracts should be examined under the provisions on contracts for the pursuit of several activities to determine which procurement rules, if any, will govern their award.
Na koncu bi bilo treba pojasniti še, da bi bilo treba koncesije, podeljene za izvajanje pogodb, ki se hkrati nanašajo na ogrevanje in hlajenje, obravnavati v skladu z določbami o pogodbah za izvajanje več dejavnosti, na podlagi česar se določi, katera pravila naročanja, če sploh katera, bodo urejala njihovo podelitev.
Before envisaging any change to the scope of this Directive for the cooling sector, the situation of that sector should be examined in order to obtain sufficient information, in particular in respect of the competitive situation, the degree of cross-border procurement and the views of stakeholders.
Pred kakršno koli načrtovano spremembo področja uporabe te direktive za sektor hlajenja bi bilo treba preučiti položaj tega sektorja, da bi pridobili dovolj informacij, zlasti v zvezi s konkurenčnim položajem, obsegom čezmejnega naročanja in mnenji zainteresiranih strani.
Given that the application of this Directive to the sector could have a substantial impact in terms of market-opening, that examination should be conducted when assessing the impact of this Directive.
Ker bi lahko uporaba te direktive za ta sektor bistveno vplivala na odpiranje trga, bi bilo treba preučitev opraviti pri oceni učinka te direktive.
It should be clarified that for the purposes of paragraphs 1 and 2 of Annex II, ‘supply’ includes generation/production, wholesale and retail sale.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da za namene odstavkov 1 in 2 Priloge II „dobava“ vključuje generiranje/proizvodnjo, veleprodajo in maloprodajo.
However, production of gas in the form of extraction falls within the scope of paragraph 6 of that Annex.
Vendar proizvodnja plina v obliki črpanja spada v področje uporabe odstavka 6 navedene priloge.
In the case of mixed contracts, the applicable rules should be determined with respect to the main subject of the contract, if the different parts which constitute the contract are objectively not separable.
V primeru mešanih pogodb bi bilo treba veljavna pravila določiti glede na glavni predmet pogodbe, če so različni sestavni deli pogodbe objektivno neločljivi.
It should therefore be clarified how contracting authorities and contracting entities should determine whether the different parts are separable or not.
Zato bi bilo treba pojasniti, kako naj bi javni naročniki in naročniki določili, ali so različni deli ločljivi ali ne.
Such clarification should be based on the relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Tako pojasnilo bi bilo treba podpreti z zadevno sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije.
The determination should be carried out on a case-by-case basis, in which the expressed or presumed intentions of the contracting authority or a contracting entity to regard the various aspects making up a mixed contract as indivisible should not be sufficient, but should be supported by objective evidence capable of justifying them and of establishing the need to conclude a single contract.
Ločljivost ali neločljivost različnih delov bi se morala določiti za vsak primer posebej, pri čemer izraženi ali domnevni nameni javnega naročnika ali naročnika, da se različni vidiki, ki sestavljajo mešano pogodbo, obravnavajo kot neločljivi, ne bi smeli zadostovati, temveč bi jih bilo treba podpreti z objektivnimi dokazi, ki bi te namene lahko upravičili in bi lahko potrdili potrebo po sklenitvi enotne pogodbe.
Such a justified need to conclude a single contract could for instance be present in the case of the construction of one single building, a part of which is to be used directly by the contracting authority concerned and another part to be operated on a concession basis, for instance to provide parking facilities to the public.
Taka upravičena potreba po sklenitvi enotne pogodbe bi lahko bila denimo prisotna v primeru gradnje ene same stavbe, del katere bi neposredno uporabljal zadevni javni naročnik, drugi del pa se bi upravljal s koncesijo, npr. za zagotavljanje javnih parkirnih mest.
It should be clarified that the need to conclude a single contract may be due to reasons both of a technical nature and of an economic nature.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da se potreba po sklenitvi enotne pogodbe lahko pojavi zaradi razlogov tehnične in gospodarske narave.
In the case of mixed contracts which can be separated, contracting authorities and contracting entities are always free to award separate contracts for the separate parts of the mixed contract, in which case the provisions applicable to each separate part should be determined exclusively with respect to the characteristics of that specific contract.
Pri mešanih pogodbah, ki jih je mogoče ločiti, imajo javni naročniki in naročniki seveda vedno možnost, da za posamezne dele mešane pogodbe oddajo ločene pogodbe; v tem primeru bi morale biti določbe, ki bi se uporabljale za vsak posamezni del, določene izključno ob upoštevanju značilnosti zadevne pogodbe.
On the other hand, where contracting authorities and contracting entities choose to award a contract including both elements of a concession and other elements, whatever their value and whatever the legal regime these elements would otherwise have been subject to, the rules applicable to such cases should be indicated.
Nasprotno, če javni naročniki in naročniki sklenejo oddati pogodbo, ki vključuje elemente koncesije in druge elemente – ne glede na njihovo vrednost in ne glede na pravno ureditev, ki bi sicer veljala za te elemente – pa bi bilo treba navesti pravila, ki se uporabljajo v teh primerih.
Special provision should be made for mixed contracts involving defence or security aspects or certain parts not falling within the scope of the TFEU.
Vendar bi bilo treba predpisati posebne določbe za mešane pogodbe, ki vključujejo obrambne ali varnostne vidike oziroma nekatere dele, ki ne spadajo v področje uporabe PDEU.
Concessions might be awarded by contracting entities for the purpose of meeting the requirements of several activities, possibly subject to different legal regimes.
Koncesije se lahko podelijo za izpolnitev zahtev v zvezi z več dejavnostmi, za katere utegnejo veljati različne pravne ureditve.
It should be clarified that the legal regime applicable to a single concession intended to cover several activities should be subject to the rules applicable to the activity for which it is principally intended.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da bi morala biti pravna ureditev, ki se uporablja za enotno koncesijo, namenjeno za več dejavnosti, podrejena pravilom, ki se uporabljajo za dejavnost, za katero je pogodba pretežno namenjena.
Determination of the activity for which the concession is principally intended can be based on an analysis of the requirements which the specific concession must meet, carried out by the contracting entity for the purposes of estimating the concession value and drawing up the concession award documents.
Določitev dejavnosti, za katero je koncesija pretežno namenjena, bi morala temeljiti na analizi zahtev, ki jih mora določena koncesija izpolnjevati, opravi pa jo naročnik, da oceni vrednost koncesije in pripravi dokumentacijo v zvezi s podeljevanjem koncesije.
In certain cases, it might be objectively impossible to determine for which activity the concession is principally intended.
V nekaterih primerih je lahko objektivno nemogoče določiti, za katero dejavnost je koncesija pretežno namenjena.
The rules applicable to such cases should be indicated.
Določiti bi bilo treba, katera pravila veljajo za take primere.
In certain cases, a given contracting authority or contracting entity which is a State, regional or local authority or body governed by public law or a given association thereof might be the sole source for a given service, for the provision of which it enjoys an exclusive right pursuant to national laws, regulations or published administrative provisions which are compatible with the TFEU.
V nekaterih primerih je določeni javni naročnik ali naročnik, ki je državni, regionalni ali lokalni organ ali oseba javnega prava ali določeno združenje takih organov, edini, ki lahko opravlja neko storitev, za kar ima na podlagi nacionalnih zakonov ali drugih objavljenih predpisov, ki so skladni s PDEU, izključno pravico.
It should be clarified that in those situations a contracting authority or contracting entity as referred to in this recital or association thereof may award concessions to such bodies without this Directive being applied.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da lahko v takem primeru navedeni javni naročnik ali naročnik iz te uvodne izjave ali združenje javnih naročnikov ali naročnikov podeli koncesije takim osebam brez uporabe te direktive.
It is also appropriate to exclude from the scope of this Directive certain services concessions awarded to economic operators, where they are awarded on the basis of an exclusive right which that operator enjoys under national laws, regulations or published administrative provisions and which has been granted in accordance with the TFEU and Union acts laying down common rules on access to the market applicable to activities referred to in Annex II, since such exclusive right makes it impossible to follow a competitive procedure for the award.
Primerno je tudi, da se iz področja uporabe te direktive izključijo določene koncesije za storitve, podeljene gospodarskim subjektom, če so podeljene na podlagi izključne pravice, ki jo ima določeni gospodarski subjekt v skladu z nacionalnim zakonom ali drugim objavljenim predpisom in je bila dodeljena v skladu s PDEU in akti Unije o skupnih pravilih v zvezi z dostopom na trg, ki se uporabljajo za dejavnosti iz Priloge II, saj pri taki izključni pravici ni mogoče uporabiti konkurenčnega postopka podelitve koncesije.
By way of derogation and without prejudice to the legal consequences of the general exclusion from the scope of this Directive, concessions as referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 10(1) should be subject to the obligation to publish a concession award notice in view of ensuring basic transparency unless the conditions of such transparency are provided for in sectoral legislation.
Ne glede na to in brez poseganja v pravne posledice splošne izključitve iz področja uporabe te direktive bi morala za koncesije iz drugega pododstavka člena 10(1) veljati obveznost objave obvestila o podelitvi koncesije, da se zagotovi osnovna transparentnost, razen če so pogoji za tako transparentnost določeni s področno zakonodajo.
In order to reinforce transparency, where a Member State grants an exclusive right to an economic operator for the exercise of one of the activities referred to in Annex II, it should inform the Commission thereof.
Zaradi boljše transparentnosti bi morala država članica, ki gospodarskemu subjektu dodeli izključno pravico za izvajanje ene od dejavnosti iz Priloge II, o tem obvestiti Komisijo.
For the purposes of this Directive, the notions of essential security interests, military equipment, sensitive equipment, sensitive works and sensitive services should be understood within the meaning of Directive 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [11].
Za namene te direktive bi morali imeti pojmi bistveni varnostni interesi, vojaška oprema, občutljiva oprema, občutljive gradnje in občutljive storitve enak pomen kot v Direktivi 2009/81/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11].
This Directive should not affect the freedom of Member States to choose, in accordance with Union law, methods for organising and controlling the operation of gambling and betting, including by means of authorisations.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati na možnost držav članic, da v skladu s pravom Unije izberejo metode za organiziranje in nadziranje iger na srečo in stav, tudi z dovoljenji.