natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Technical reasons may also derive from specific interoperability requirements which must be fulfilled in order to ensure the functioning of the works, supplies or services to be procured.
Tehnični razlogi lahko izvirajo tudi iz posebnih zahtev glede interoperabilnosti, ki jih je treba izpolniti, da se zagotovi delovanje gradenj, blaga ali storitev, ki so predmet javnega naročila.
Finally, a procurement procedure is not useful where supplies are purchased directly on a commodity market, including trading platforms for commodities such as agricultural products, raw materials and energy exchanges, where the regulated and supervised multilateral trading structure naturally guarantees market prices.
Nenazadnje postopek javnega naročanja ni uporaben, če se blago neposredno nabavi na blagovni borzi, vključno s tržnimi platformami za blago, kot so borze kmetijskega blaga, surovin in energetskih proizvodov, na katerih regulirana in nadzorovana večstranska struktura trgovanja že po naravi zagotavlja tržne cene.
It should be clarified that the provisions concerning protection of confidential information do not in any way prevent public disclosure of non-confidential parts of concluded contracts, including any subsequent changes.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da določbe v zvezi z varovanjem zaupnih informacij nikakor ne preprečujejo javnega razkritja nezaupnih delov sklenjenih pogodb o izvedbi javnega naročila niti njihovih nadaljnjih sprememb.
Electronic means of information and communication can greatly simplify the publication of contracts and increase the efficiency and transparency of procurement processes.
Z elektronskimi informacijskimi in komunikacijskimi sredstvi se lahko zelo poenostavi objava javnih naročil ter povečata učinkovitost in transparentnost postopkov javnega naročanja.
They should become the standard means of communication and information exchange in procurement procedures, as they greatly enhance the possibilities of economic operators to participate in procurement procedures across the internal market.
Postati bi morala standardna sredstva sporočanja in izmenjave informacij v postopkih javnega naročanja, saj znatno povečujejo možnosti gospodarskih subjektov za sodelovanje v postopkih javnega naročanja na celotnem notranjem trgu.
For that purpose, transmission of notices in electronic form, electronic availability of the procurement documents and – after a transition period of 30 months – fully electronic communication, meaning communication by electronic means at all stages of the procedure, including the transmission of requests for participation and, in particular, the transmission of the tenders (electronic submission) should be made mandatory.
V ta namen bi moralo postati obvezno naslednje: pošiljanje obvestil v elektronski obliki, dostopnost dokumentacije v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila v elektronski obliki in – po prehodnem obdobju 30 mesecev – popolnoma elektronska komunikacija, tj. komunikacija z elektronskimi sredstvi v vseh fazah postopka, vključno s pošiljanjem prijav za sodelovanje in zlasti pošiljanjem ponudb (elektronska predložitev).
Member States and contracting authorities should remain free to go further if they so wish.
Državam članicam in javnim naročnikom bi morali dovoliti, da na tem področju naredijo še več, če želijo.
It should also be clarified that mandatory use of electronic means of communications pursuant to this Directive should not, however, oblige contracting authorities to carry out electronic processing of tenders, nor should it mandate electronic evaluation or automatic processing.
Treba bi bilo tudi pojasniti, da obvezna uporaba elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev v skladu s to direktivo javnim naročnikom ne bi smela predpisovati elektronske obdelave ponudb niti ne bi smela nalagati elektronskega ocenjevanja ali avtomatske obdelave.
Furthermore, pursuant to this Directive, no elements of the public procurement process after the award of the contract should be covered by the obligation to use electronic means of communication, nor should internal communication within the contracting authority.
V skladu s to direktivo pa se obvezna uporaba elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev ne bi smela nanašati na nobene dele javnega naročanja po oddaji javnega naročila in tudi ne notranje komunikacije pri javnem naročniku.
Contracting authorities should, except in certain specific situations, use electronic means of communication which are non-discriminatory, generally available and interoperable with the ICT products in general use and which do not restrict economic operators’ access to the procurement procedure.
Javni naročniki bi morali – razen v nekaterih posebnih primerih – uporabljati elektronska komunikacijska sredstva, ki so nediskriminatorna, splošno dostopna in interoperabilna s proizvodi IKT v splošni rabi ter gospodarskim subjektom ne omejujejo dostopa do postopka javnega naročanja.
The use of such means of communication should also take accessibility for persons with disabilities into due account.
Pri uporabi takšnih komunikacijskih sredstvih bi morali ustrezno upoštevati tudi dostopnost za invalidne osebe.
It should be clarified that the obligation to use electronic means at all stages of the public procurement procedure would be appropriate neither where the use of electronic means would require specialised tools or file formats that are not generally available nor where the communications concerned could only be handled using specialised office equipment.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da obvezna uporaba elektronskih sredstev v vseh fazah postopka javnega naročanja ne bi bila ustrezna, niti če bi bila za to potrebna specializirana orodja ali oblike datotek, ki niso splošno razpoložljive, niti če bi bila obravnava zadevnih sporočil možna samo z uporabo specializirane pisarniške opreme.
Contracting authorities should therefore not be obliged to require the use of electronic means of communication in the submission process in certain cases, which should be listed exhaustively.
Javni naročniki zato v nekaterih primerih, ki bi jih bilo treba izčrpno navesti, ne bi smeli biti primorani zahtevati uporabe elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev pri predložitvi ponudb.
This Directive stipulates that such cases should include situations which would require the use of specialised office equipment not generally available to the contracting authorities such as wide-format printers.
Direktiva določa, da bi taki primeri morali zajemati primere, v katerih bi bila potrebna uporaba specializirane pisarniške opreme, ki je javni naročniki navadno nimajo na voljo, na primer tiskalnikov širokega formata.
In some procurement procedures the procurement documents might require the submission of a physical or scale model which cannot be submitted to the contracting authorities using electronic means.
V nekaterih postopkih javnega naročanja je lahko v dokumentaciji v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila navedena zahteva za predložitev fizičnega modela ali makete, ki ju javnemu naročniku ni mogoče predložiti z uporabo elektronskih sredstev.
In such situations, the model should be transmitted to the contracting authorities by post or other suitable carrier.
V takih primerih bi bilo treba model javnemu naročniku poslati po pošti ali drugi primerni kurirski službi.
It should however be clarified that the use of other means of communication should be limited to those elements of the tender for which electronic means of communications are not required.
Vendar bi bilo treba pojasniti, da bi morala biti uporaba drugih komunikacijskih sredstev omejena na tiste dele ponudbe, za katere se elektronska komunikacijska sredstva ne zahtevajo.
It is appropriate to clarify that, where necessary for technical reasons, contracting authorities should be able to set a maximum limit to the size of the files that may be submitted.
Primerno je pojasniti, da bi morali javni naročniki imeti možnost določiti največjo velikost datotek, ki se lahko predložijo, kadar je to potrebno zaradi tehničnih razlogov.
There can be exceptional cases in which contracting authorities should be allowed not to use electronic means of communication where not using such means of communication is necessary in order to protect the particularly sensitive nature of information.
V nekaterih izjemnih primerih bi javnim naročnikom morali dovoliti, da ne uporabljajo elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev, če bi bilo to potrebno zaradi varstva posebej občutljivih informacij.
It should be clarified that, where the use of electronic tools which are not generally available can offer the necessary level of protection, such electronic tools should be used.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da bi morali v primeru, ko se lahko potrebna stopnja varstva zagotovi z uporabo elektronskih sredstev, ki niso splošno dostopna, uporabljati taka elektronska sredstva.
Such might for instance be the case where contracting authorities require the use of dedicated secure means of communication to which they offer access.
Tak primer je lahko denimo, kadar javni naročniki zahtevajo, da se uporabljajo posebna varna komunikacijska sredstva, do katerih nudijo dostop.
Differing technical formats or processes and messaging standards could potentially create obstacles to interoperability, not only within each Member State but also and especially between the Member States.
Različni tehnični formati ali postopki ter standardi sporočanja bi lahko ovirali interoperabilnost, ne le znotraj posamezne države članice, temveč tudi in zlasti med državami članicami.
For example, in order to participate in a procurement procedure in which use of electronic catalogues, which is a format for the presentation and organisation of information in a manner that is common to all the participating bidders and which lends itself to electronic treatment, is permitted or required, economic operators would, in the absence of standardisation, be required to customise their own catalogues to each procurement procedure, which would entail providing very similar information in different formats depending on the specifications of the contracting authority concerned.
Za sodelovanje v postopku javnega naročanja, pri katerem se dovoli ali zahteva uporaba elektronskih katalogov, tj. formata za predstavitev in razvrstitev informacij na način, ki je skupen vsem sodelujočim ponudnikom in ustrezen za elektronsko uporabo, bi na primer moral gospodarski subjekt zaradi odsotnosti standardizacije svoje kataloge prilagoditi posameznemu postopku javnega naročanja, kar bi pomenilo zagotavljanje zelo podobnih informacij v različnih formatih glede na specifikacije zadevnega javnega naročnika.
Standardising the catalogue formats would thus improve the level of interoperability, enhance efficiency and would also reduce the effort required of economic operators.
Standardizacija formatov kataloga bi torej izboljšala raven interoperabilnosti, povečala učinkovitost ter tudi zmanjšala prizadevanje, ki se zahteva od gospodarskih subjektov.
When considering whether there is a need to ensure or enhance interoperability between differing technical formats or process and messaging standards by rendering the use of specific standards mandatory, and if so which standards to impose, the Commission should take the utmost account of the opinions of the stakeholders concerned.
Komisija bi morala pri preučitvi, ali obstaja potreba, da se z določitvijo obvezne uporabe nekaterih standardov zagotovi ali poveča interoperabilnost med različnimi tehničnimi formati ali standardi na področju postopkov in sporočanja, in – če ta potreba obstaja – katere standarde bi bilo treba uvesti, čim bolj upoštevati mnenja zadevnih zainteresiranih strani.
It should also consider the extent to which a given standard has already been used in practice by economic operators and contracting authorities and how well it has worked.
Preučiti bi morala tudi, do katere mere gospodarski subjekti in javni naročniki v praksi že uporabljajo določen standard ter kako uspešna je ta uporaba.
Before making the use of any particular technical standard mandatory, the Commission should also carefully consider the costs that this might entail, in particular in terms of adaptations to existing e-procurement solutions, including infrastructure, processes or software.
Komisija bi morala pred določitvijo obvezne uporabe kakršnega koli določenega tehničnega standarda tudi pazljivo preučiti morebitne s tem povezane stroške, zlasti glede prilagoditev veljavnih rešitev pri elektronskem javnem naročanju, vključno z infrastrukturo, postopki ali programsko opremo.
Where the standards concerned are not developed by an international, European or national standardisation organisation, they should meet the requirements applicable to ICT standards as set out in Regulation (EU) 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [12].
Če zadevnih standardov ne razvije mednarodna, evropska ali nacionalna organizacija za standardizacijo, bi morali standardi izpolnjevati zahteve, ki veljajo za standarde na področju informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije, določene v Uredbi (EU) št. 1025/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12].
Before specifying the level of security required for the electronic means of communications to be used at the various stages of the award procedure, Member States and contracting authorities should evaluate the proportionality between on the one hand the requirements aimed at ensuring correct and reliable identification of the senders of the communication concerned as well as the integrity of its content, and on the other hand the risk of problems such as in situations where messages are sent by a different sender than that indicated.
Pred določitvijo stopnje varnosti, zahtevane za elektronska komunikacijska sredstva, ki se bodo uporabljala v različnih fazah postopka javnega naročanja, bi morali države članice in javni naročniki oceniti sorazmernost med zahtevami za zagotavljanje pravilne in zanesljive identifikacije pošiljateljev zadevnega sporočila ter njegove celotne vsebine na eni strani in nevarnostjo težav na drugi strani, kot denimo v primeru, da sporočilo pošlje drug pošiljatelj od navedenega.
All other things being equal, this would mean that the level of security required of, for instance, an email requesting confirmation of the exact address at which an information meeting will be held would not need to be set at the same level as for the tender itself which constitutes a binding offer for the economic operator.
Če vse ostane nespremenjeno, bi to pomenilo, da stopnje varnosti, zahtevane na primer za elektronsko pošto s prošnjo za potrditev natančnega naslova, na katerem bo potekal informativni sestanek, ne bi bilo treba določiti enako visoko kot za samo ponudbo, ki je za gospodarski subjekt zavezujoča.
Similarly, the evaluation of proportionality could result in lower levels of security being required in connection with the resubmission of electronic catalogues or the submission of tenders in the context of mini-competitions under a framework agreement or the access to procurement documents.
Na podlagi ocene sorazmernosti bi bile morda potrebne nižje stopnje varnosti v zvezi s ponovno predložitvijo elektronskih katalogov ali predložitvijo ponudb v okviru manjših razpisov na podlagi okvirnega sporazuma oziroma dostopom do dokumentacije v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila.
While essential elements of a procurement procedure such as the procurement documents, requests for participation, confirmation of interest and tenders should always be made in writing, oral communication with economic operators should otherwise continue to be possible, provided that its content is documented to a sufficient degree.
Medtem ko bi morali biti bistveni deli postopka javnega naročanja, kot so dokumentacija v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila, prijave za sodelovanje, potrditve interesa in ponudbe, zmeraj v pisni obliki, pa bi še vedno morala biti možna ustna komunikacija z gospodarskimi subjekti, če je njena vsebina zadostno dokumentirana.
This is necessary to ensure an adequate level of transparency that allows for a verification of whether the principle of equal treatment has been adhered to.
To je nujno za zagotavljanje ustrezne ravni transparentnosti, ki omogoča preverjanje upoštevanja načela enake obravnave.
In particular, it is essential that oral communications with tenderers which could have an impact on the content and assessment of the tenders be documented to a sufficient extent and by appropriate means, such as written or audio records or summaries of the main elements of the communication.
Zlasti je bistveno, da se ustna komunikacija s ponudniki, ki bi lahko vplivala na vsebino in oceno ponudb, dokumentira v zadostni meri in z ustreznimi sredstvi, na primer pisnimi ali zvočnimi zapisi ali povzetki glavnih delov komunikacije.
There is a strong trend emerging across Union public procurement markets towards the aggregation of demand by public purchasers, with a view to obtaining economies of scale, including lower prices and transaction costs, and to improving and professionalising procurement management.
Na trgih javnega naročanja v Uniji se pojavlja močna težnja po združevanju povpraševanja javnih naročnikov za doseganje ekonomije obsega, vključno z nižjimi cenami in transakcijskimi stroški, ter za izboljšanje in profesionalizacijo vodenja postopkov javnega naročanja.
This can be achieved by concentrating purchases either by the number of contracting authorities involved or by volume and value over time.
To se lahko doseže z združevanjem javnih naročil večjega števila vključenih javnih naročnikov ali pa z združevanjem naročil v smislu obsega in vrednosti v daljšem obdobju.
However, the aggregation and centralisation of purchases should be carefully monitored in order to avoid excessive concentration of purchasing power and collusion, and to preserve transparency and competition, as well as market access opportunities for SMEs.
Vendar bi bilo treba združevanje in centralizacijo naročil skrbno spremljati, da se preprečita čezmerna koncentracija kupne moči in nedovoljeno dogovarjanje ter ohranijo transparentnost, konkurenca in možnosti MSP za dostop do trga.
The instrument of framework agreements has been widely used and is considered as an efficient procurement technique throughout Europe.
Pogosto se uporablja instrument okvirnih sporazumov, ki v Evropi velja za učinkovito tehniko javnega naročanja.
It should therefore be maintained largely as it is.
Zato bi ga bilo treba ohraniti v glavnem nespremenjenega.
However, certain aspects need to be clarified, in particular that framework agreements should not be used by contracting authorities which are not identified in them.
Vendar je treba pojasniti nekaj vidikov, zlasti dejstvo, da javni naročniki ne bi smeli uporabljati okvirnih sporazumov, v katerih sami niso navedeni.
For that purpose, the contracting authorities that are parties to a specific framework agreement from the outset should be clearly indicated, either by name or by other means, such as a reference to a given category of contracting authorities within a clearly delimited geographical area, so that the contracting authorities concerned can be easily and unequivocally identified.
V ta namen bi morali biti javni naročniki, podpisniki določenega okvirnega sporazuma, tako jasno navedeni že od samega začetka, in sicer z imenom ali kako drugače, na primer z omembo določene kategorije javnih naročnikov na jasno določenem geografskem območju, tako da je mogoče zadevne javne naročnike enostavno in nedvoumno opredeliti.
Likewise, a framework agreement should not be open to entry of new economic operators once it has been concluded.
Okvirni sporazum po sklenitvi prav tako ne bi smel biti odprt za sodelovanje novih gospodarskih subjektov.
This implies for instance that where a central purchasing body uses an overall register of the contracting authorities or categories thereof, such as the local authorities in a given geographical area, that are entitled to have recourse to framework agreements it concludes, that central purchasing body should do so in a way that makes it possible to verify not only the identity of the contracting authority concerned but also the date from which it acquires the right to have recourse to the framework agreement concluded by the central purchasing body as that date determines which specific framework agreements that contracting authority should be allowed to use.
To na primer pomeni, da bi moral osrednji nabavni organ, če uporablja skupni register javnih naročnikov ali njihovih kategorij – na primer lokalnih organov na danem geografskem območju, ki lahko uporabljajo okvirni sporazum, ki ga sklene osrednji nabavni organ –, poskrbeti, da bi bilo možno preveriti ne le identiteto zadevnega javnega naročnika, temveč tudi datum, od katerega ima ta organ pravico uporabe okvirnega sporazuma, ki ga je sklenil osrednji nabavni organ, saj ta datum določa, katere specifične okvirne sporazume bi moralo biti temu javnemu naročniku dovoljeno uporabljati.
The objective conditions for determining which of the economic operators party to the framework agreement should perform a given task, such as supplies or services intended for use by natural persons, may, in the context of framework agreements setting out all the terms, include the needs or the choice of the natural persons concerned.
Objektivni pogoji za ugotavljanje, kateri od gospodarskih subjektov, podpisnikov okvirnega sporazuma, naj bi izvedel določeno nalogo, na primer zagotovil blago ali storitve, namenjene za uporabo pri fizičnih osebah, lahko pri okvirnih sporazumih, v katerih so določeni vsi pogoji, zajemajo tudi potrebe ali izbiro zadevnih fizičnih oseb.
Contracting authorities should be given additional flexibility when procuring under framework agreements, which are concluded with more than one economic operator and which set out all the terms.
Javni naročniki bi morali imeti dodatno prožnost pri javnem naročanju v skladu z okvirnimi sporazumi, ki so sklenjeni z več gospodarskimi subjekti in določajo vse pogoje.
In such cases, contracting authorities should be allowed to obtain specific works, supplies or services, that are covered by the framework agreement, either by requiring them from one of the economic operators, determined in accordance with objective criteria and on the terms already set out, or by awarding a specific contract for the works, supplies or services concerned following a mini-competition among the economic operators parties to the framework agreement.
Javnim naročnikom bi moralo biti v takih primerih dovoljeno, da določene gradnje, blago ali storitve, vključene v okvirni sporazum, pridobijo tako, da zanje zaprosijo enega od gospodarskih subjektov, ki ga določijo skladno z nepristranskimi merili in že opredeljenimi pogoji, ali pa z oddajo posameznega naročila za zadevne gradnje, blago ali storitve, ki sledi manjšemu razpisu med gospodarskimi subjekti, podpisniki okvirnega sporazuma.
To ensure transparency and equal treatment, contracting authorities should indicate in the procurement documents for the framework agreement the objective criteria that will govern the choice between those two methods of performing the framework agreement.
Da se zagotovita transparentnost in enaka obravnava, bi morali javni naročniki v dokumentaciji v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila za sklenitev okvirnega sporazuma navesti nepristranska merila, ki bodo urejala izbiro med navedenima načinoma izvajanja okvirnega sporazuma.
Such criteria could for instance relate to the quantity, value or characteristics of the works, supplies or services concerned, including the need for a higher degree of service or an increased security level, or to developments in price levels compared to a predetermined price index.
Taka merila bi lahko zadevala na primer količino, vrednost ali značilnosti zadevnih gradenj, blaga ali storitev, vključno s potrebo po višji ravni storitve ali povečani stopnji varnosti, ali spremembe v ceni glede na predhodno določen indeks cen.
Framework agreements should not be used improperly or in such a way as to prevent, restrict or distort competition.
Okvirni sporazumi se ne bi smeli uporabljati neustrezno ali tako, da bi preprečevali, omejevali ali izkrivljali konkurenco.