natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bearing in mind that the contracting entity will be responsible for the consequences of its possible erroneous decision, contracting entities should also remain free to consider that there has been grave professional misconduct, where, before a final and binding decision on the presence of mandatory exclusion grounds has been rendered, they can demonstrate by any appropriate means that the economic operator has violated its obligations, including obligations relating to the payment of taxes or social security contributions, unless otherwise provided by national law.
Glede na to, da bodo naročniki odgovorni za posledice svoje morebitne napačne odločitve, bi morali imeti še naprej možnost domnevati, da je prišlo do hujših kršitev poklicnih pravil, če lahko, preden se sprejme končna in zavezujoča odločitev o obstoju razlogov za obvezno izključitev, na kakršen koli ustrezen način dokažejo, da je gospodarski subjekt kršil svoje obveznosti, vključno z obveznostmi glede plačevanja davkov ali prispevkov za socialno varnost, razen če nacionalno pravo določa drugače.
They should also be able to exclude candidates or tenderers whose performance in earlier public contracts or contracts with other contracting entities has shown major deficiencies with regard to substantive requirements, for instance failure to deliver or perform, significant shortcomings of the product or service delivered, making it unusable for the intended purpose, or misbehaviour that casts serious doubts as to the reliability of the economic operator.
Morali bi imeti tudi možnost izključitve kandidatov ali ponudnikov, če so se pri izvajanju prejšnjih javnih naročil ali naročil z drugimi naročniki pri njih pokazale večje pomanjkljivosti glede ključnih zahtev, na primer nezmožnost dobave ali izvedbe, velike pomanjkljivosti dobavljenega proizvoda ali opravljene storitve, zaradi katerih sta bila ta proizvod ali storitev neuporabna za predvideni namen, ali pa neustrezno ravnanje, ki vzbuja resne dvome o zanesljivosti gospodarskega subjekta.
National law should provide for a maximum duration for such exclusions.
V nacionalni zakonodaji bi moralo biti določeno najdaljše trajanje take izključitve.
In applying facultative grounds for exclusion, particular attention should be paid to the principle of proportionality.
Pri uporabi neobveznih razlogov za izključitev bi bilo treba posebno pozornost nameniti načelu sorazmernosti.
However repeated cases of minor irregularities can give rise to doubts about the reliability of an economic operator which might justify its exclusion.
Vendar pa se v primeru ponavljajočih se manjših nepravilnosti lahko pojavijo dvomi glede zanesljivosti gospodarskega subjekta, kar lahko upraviči njegovo izključitev.
Where contracting entities are obliged or choose to apply the such exclusion criteria, they should apply Directive 2014/24/EU concerning the possibility that economic operators adopt compliance measures aimed at remedying the consequences of any criminal offences or misconduct and at effectively preventing further occurrences of the misbehaviour.
Če so naročniki dolžni uporabljati takšne izključitvene pogoje ali pa se za njihovo uporabo odločijo sami, bi morali v zvezi z možnostjo, da gospodarski subjekti sprejmejo ukrepe v zvezi z zagotavljanjem ustreznosti, namenjene odpravi posledic kaznivih dejanj ali kršitev in učinkovitemu preprečevanju nadaljnjih primerov neustreznega ravnanja, uporabiti Direktivo 2014/24/EU.
Where the tenderer cannot provide a sufficient explanation, the contracting entity should be entitled to reject the tender.
Če ponudnik ne more zagotoviti zadovoljive obrazložitve, bi moral imeti naročnik možnost, da zavrne ponudbo.
Rejection should be mandatory in cases where the contracting entity has established that the abnormally low price or costs proposed results from non-compliance with mandatory Union law or national law compatible with it in the fields of social, labour or environmental law or international labour law provisions.
Zavrnitev bi morala biti obvezna, če naročnik ugotovi, da neobičajno nizka predlagana cena ali stroški izhajajo iz neupoštevanja obveznega prava Unije ali z njim skladnega nacionalnega prava na področju socialnega, delovnega ali okoljskega prava ali neupoštevanja določb mednarodnega delovnega prava.
Unlike contract award criteria which are the basis for a comparative assessment of the quality of tenders, contract performance conditions constitute fixed objective requirements that have no impact on the assessment of tenders.
Merila za oddajo javnega naročila so podlaga za primerjalno oceno kakovosti ponudb, pogoji za izvedbo javnega naročila pa so določene in objektivne zahteve, ki nimajo nobenega vpliva na oceno ponudb.
Contract performance conditions should be compatible with this Directive provided that they are not directly or indirectly discriminatory and are linked to the subject-matter of the contract, which comprises all factors involved in the specific process of production, provision or commercialisation.
Pogoji za izvedbo naročila bi morali biti združljivi s to direktivo, pod pogojem, da niso neposredno ali posredno diskriminatorni in so povezani s predmetom javnega naročila, kar vključuje vse dejavnike, zajete v določenem postopku proizvodnje, dobave ali trženja.
It is important that observance by subcontractors of applicable obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law, established by Union law, national law, collective agreements or by the international environmental, social and labour law provisions listed in this Directive, provided that such rules, and their application, comply with Union law, be ensured through appropriate actions by the competent national authorities within the scope of their responsibilities and remit, such as labour inspection agencies or environmental protection agencies.
Pomembno je, da pristojni nacionalni organi, kot so na primer delovne inšpekcije ali agencije za varstvo okolja, z ustreznimi ukrepi v okviru svoje odgovornosti in pristojnosti zagotovijo, da podizvajalci upoštevajo veljavne obveznosti s področij okoljskega, socialnega in delovnega prava, določene v pravu Unije, nacionalnem pravu, kolektivnih pogodbah ali predpisih mednarodnega okoljskega, socialnega in delovnega prava, navedenih v tej direktivi, če so takšna pravila in njihova uporaba v skladu s pravom Unije.
It is also necessary to ensure some transparency in the subcontracting chain, as this gives contracting entities information on who is present at building sites on which works are being performed for them, or on which undertakings are providing services in or at buildings, infrastructures or areas, such as town halls, municipal schools, sports facilities, ports or motorways, for which the contracting entities are responsible or over which they have a direct oversight.
Zagotoviti je treba tudi določeno transparentnost v podizvajalski verigi, tako bodo namreč naročniki obveščeni o tem, kdo je prisoten na gradbiščih, na katerih se zanje izvaja gradnja, katera podjetja opravljajo storitve v stavbah, infrastrukturi ali na območjih, kot so mestne hiše, občinske šole, športni objekti, pristanišča ali avtoceste, za katera so naročniki odgovorni ali ki so pod njihovim neposrednim nadzorom.
It should be clarified that the obligation to deliver the required information is in any case incumbent upon the main contractor, either on the basis of specific clauses, that each contracting entity would have to include in all procurement procedures, or on the basis of obligations which Member States would impose on main contractors by means of generally applicable provisions.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da je za posredovanje zahtevanih informacij v vsakem primeru odgovoren glavni izvajalec, bodisi na podlagi posebnih določb, ki bi jih vsak naročnik moral vključiti v vse postopke javnega naročanja, bodisi na podlagi obveznosti, ki bi jih države članice naložile glavnim izvajalcem v obliki splošno veljavnih predpisov.
Furthermore, it should be stated explicitly that Member States should be able to go further, for instance by extending the transparency obligations, by enabling direct payment to subcontractors or by enabling or requiring contracting authorities to verify that subcontractors are not in any of the situations in which exclusion of economic operators would be warranted.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba izrecno navesti, da gredo države članice lahko še dlje, na primer tako, da razširijo obveznosti glede transparentnosti, omogočijo neposredna plačila podizvajalcem ali da naročnikom omogočijo oziroma od njih zahtevajo, da preverijo, ali podizvajalci niso v nobeni od situacij, ki bi utemeljevala izključitev gospodarskih subjektov.
Where such measures are applied to subcontractors, coherence with the provisions applicable to main contractors should be ensured so that the existence of compulsory exclusion grounds would be followed by a requirement that the main contractor replaces the subcontractor concerned.
Če se taki ukrepi uporabljajo za podizvajalce, bi bilo treba zagotoviti skladnost z določbami, ki se uporabljajo za glavne izvajalce; obstoj obveznih razlogov za izključitev bi tako pomenil, da mora glavni izvajalec zamenjati zadevnega podizvajalca.
Where such verification shows the presence of non-compulsory grounds for exclusion, it should be clarified that contracting authorities are able to require the replacement.
Če se pri takem preverjanju izkaže, da obstajajo neobvezni razlogi za izključitev, bi bilo treba pojasniti, da lahko naročniki zahtevajo zamenjavo.
It should, however, also be set out explicitly that contracting authorities may be obliged to require the replacement of the subcontractor concerned where exclusion of main contractors would be obligatory in such cases.
Izrecno pa bi bilo treba navesti tudi, da so naročniki lahko primorani zahtevati zamenjavo zadevnega podizvajalca, če je v istih primerih obvezna izključitev glavnih izvajalcev.
It should also be set out explicitly that Member States remain free to provide for more stringent liability rules under national law or to go further under national law on direct payments to subcontractors.
Izrecno bi bilo tudi treba navesti, da lahko države članice v nacionalnih zakonodajah še naprej določajo strožja pravila glede odgovornosti oziroma da gredo lahko v nacionalnih zakonodajah dlje glede neposrednih plačil podizvajalcem.
Having regard to current discussions on horizontal provisions governing relations with third countries in the context of public procurement, it is appropriate to maintain for an interim period the status quo of the regime which applies to the utilities sector pursuant to Articles 58 and 59 of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Ob upoštevanju trenutnih razprav o horizontalnih določbah, ki urejajo odnose s tretjimi državami v okviru javnih naročil, je primerno, da se v prehodnem obdobju sedanje stanje v zvezi z ureditvijo, ki se na podlagi členov 58 in 59 Direktive 2004/17/ES uporablja za sektor gospodarskih javnih služb, ne spreminja.
Consequently, those provisions should be kept unchanged, including the provision for the adoption of implementing acts where Union undertakings have difficulties in accessing third country markets.
Te določbe bi zato morale ostati nespremenjene, vključno z določbo o sprejemanju izvedbenih aktov, kadar imajo podjetja Unije probleme pri dostopu do trgov tretjih držav.
Under these circumstances, those implementing acts should continue to be adopted by the Council.
V teh okoliščinah bi navedene izvedbene akte moral še naprej sprejemati Svet.
It should be recalled that Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 [26] applies to the calculation of the time limits contained in this Directive.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba, da se za izračun iztekov rokov iz te direktive uporablja Uredba Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71 [26].
It is necessary to clarify the conditions under which modifications to a contract during its performance require a new procurement procedure, taking into account the relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Ob upoštevanju zadevne sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije je treba pojasniti okoliščine, v katerih je treba zaradi sprememb javnega naročila med njegovim izvajanjem izvesti nov postopek javnega naročanja.
A new procurement procedure is required in case of material changes to the initial contract, in particular to the scope and content of the mutual rights and obligations of the parties, including the distribution of intellectual property rights.
Nov postopek javnega naročanja se zahteva v primeru bistvenih sprememb prvotnega naročila, zlasti glede obsega in vsebine vzajemnih pravic ter obveznosti pogodbenih strank, vključno s porazdelitvijo pravic intelektualne lastnine.
Such changes demonstrate the parties’ intention to renegotiate essential terms or conditions of that contract.
Take spremembe kažejo, da se nameravajo pogodbene stranke ponovno pogajati o ključnih določilih ali pogojih naročila.
This is the case in particular if the amended conditions would have had an influence on the outcome of the procedure, had they been part of the initial procedure.
To še zlasti velja v primeru, da bi spremenjeni pogoji, če bi veljali že za prvotni postopek, vplivali na njegov rezultat.
Modifications to the contract resulting in a minor change of the contract value up to a certain value should always be possible without the need to carry out a new procurement procedure.
Spremembe pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila, zaradi katerih se le malo spremeni vrednost javnega naročila do določene vrednosti, bi morale biti vedno možne, ne da bi bilo zaradi tega treba izvesti nov postopek javnega naročanja.
Modifications to the contract above those thresholds should be possible without the need to carry out a new procurement procedure to the extent they comply with the relevant conditions laid down in this Directive.
Spremembe pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila nad temi mejnimi vrednostmi bi morale biti možne, ne da bi bilo zaradi tega treba izvesti nov postopek naročanja, če izpolnjujejo ustrezne pogoje iz te direktive.
Contracting entities may be faced with situations where additional works, supplies or services become necessary; in such cases a modification of the initial contract without a new procurement procedure may be justified, in particular where the additional deliveries are intended either as a partial replacements or as the extension of existing services, supplies or installations where a change of supplier would oblige the contracting entity to acquire material, works or services having different technical characteristics which would result in incompatibility or disproportionate technical difficulties in operation and maintenance
Naročniki so lahko v določenih situacijah soočeni s potrebo po dodatnih gradnjah, blagu ali storitvah; v takih primerih je lahko upravičena sprememba prvotnega naročila brez novega postopka javnega naročanja, zlasti kadar so dodatne dobave namenjene za delno nadomestitev ali za povečanje obsega obstoječih storitev, blaga ali inštalacij in bi zamenjava dobavitelja povzročila, da bi moral naročnik nabaviti blago, gradnjo ali storitve z drugačnimi tehničnimi lastnostmi, kar bi povzročilo neskladnost ali nesorazmerne tehnične težave med obratovanjem in vzdrževanjem.
Contracting entities can be faced with external circumstances that they could not foresee when they awarded the contract, in particular when the performance of the contract covers a long period.
Naročniki se lahko srečajo z zunanjimi okoliščinami, ki jih ob oddaji javnega naročila niso mogli predvideti, zlasti če se javno naročilo izvaja v daljšem obdobju.
In this case, a certain degree of flexibility is needed to adapt the contract to those circumstances without a new procurement procedure.
V takem primeru je potrebna določena mera prožnosti, da se javno naročilo prilagodi tem okoliščinam, ne da bi bilo treba sprožiti nov postopek javnega naročanja.
The notion of unforeseeable circumstances refers to circumstances that could not have been predicted despite reasonably diligent preparation of the initial award by the contracting entity, taking into account its available means, the nature and characteristics of the specific project, good practice in the field in question and the need to ensure an appropriate relationship between the resources spent in preparing the award and its foreseeable value.
Pojem „nepredvidene okoliščine“ se nanaša na okoliščine, ki jih ne bi bilo mogoče napovedati, četudi bi naročnik ustrezno skrbno pripravil prvotno oddajo javnega naročila, upoštevajoč razpoložljiva sredstva, vrsto in značilnosti zadevnega projekta, dobro prakso na zadevnem področju in potrebo po zagotovitvi ustreznega razmerja med sredstvi, porabljenimi za pripravo oddaje javnega naročila, in predvideno vrednostjo tega naročila.
However, this cannot apply in cases where a modification results in an alteration of the nature of the overall procurement, for instance by replacing the works, supplies or services to be procured by something different or by fundamentally changing the type of procurement since, in such a situation, a hypothetical influence on the outcome may be assumed.
Vendar to ne more veljati za primere, v katerih se zaradi neke spremembe spremeni narava celotnega javnega naročila, ko se denimo naročene gradnje, blago ali storitve nadomestijo z drugimi ali ko se bistveno spremeni vrsta naročila, saj se tedaj lahko predpostavlja nek hipotetičen vpliv na rezultat.
In line with the principles of equal treatment and transparency, the successful tenderer should not, for instance where a contract is terminated because of deficiencies in the performance, be replaced by another economic operator without reopening the contract to competition.
V skladu z načeloma enake obravnave in transparentnosti uspešnega ponudnika, denimo v primeru odpovedi javnega naročila zaradi pomanjkljivosti v njegovi izvedbi, ne bi smeli nadomestiti z drugim gospodarskim subjektom, ne da bi javnega naročilo ponovni odprli konkurenci.
However, the successful tenderer performing the contract should be able, in particular where the contract has been awarded to more than one undertaking, to undergo certain structural changes during the performance of the contract, such as purely internal reorganisations, takeovers, mergers and acquisitions or insolvency.
Pri uspešnem ponudniku, ki izvaja javno naročilo, pa lahko, zlasti če se naročilo odda več kot enemu podjetju, med izvajanjem javnega naročila pride do določenih strukturnih sprememb, kot so strogo notranje reorganizacije, prevzemi, združitve in pripojitve ali insolventnost.
Such structural changes should not automatically require new procurement procedures for all contracts performed by that tenderer.
Zaradi takih strukturnih sprememb ne bi smeli biti samodejno potrebni novi postopki javnega naročanja za vsa javna naročila, ki jih izvaja zadevni ponudnik.
Contracting entities should, in the individual contracts themselves, have the possibility to provide for modifications by way of review or option clauses, but such clauses should not give them unlimited discretion.
Naročnikom bi bilo treba omogočiti, da v posameznih pogodbah o izvedbi javnega naročila predvidijo možnost sprememb in v ta namen vključijo določbe o reviziji ali določbe o opcijah, vendar jim te ne bi smele zagotavljati neomejene proste presoje.
This Directive should therefore set out to what extent modifications may be provided for in the initial contract.
Ta direktiva bi zato morala določiti, v kolikšni meri se lahko predvidi možnost spreminjanja v prvotnem naročilu.
It should consequently be clarified that sufficiently clearly drafted review or option clauses may for instance provide for price indexations or ensure that, for example, communications equipment to be delivered over a given period continues to be suitable, also in the case of changing communications protocols or other technological changes.
Zato bi bilo treba pojasniti, da lahko dovolj jasno oblikovane določbe o reviziji ali določbe o opcijah določajo na primer indeksacijo cen ali, denimo, zagotovijo, da je oprema za komunikacijo, ki se dobavi v določenem obdobju, še naprej ustrezna, tudi v primeru spremembe komunikacijskih protokolov ali drugih tehnoloških sprememb.
It should also be possible under sufficiently clear clauses to provide for adaptations of the contract which are rendered necessary by technical difficulties which have appeared during operation or maintenance.
Z dovolj jasnimi določbami bi moralo biti mogoče določiti tudi prilagoditve pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila, potrebne zaradi tehničnih težav, ki se pojavijo med obratovanjem ali vzdrževanjem.
It should also be recalled that contracts could, for instance, include both ordinary maintenance as well as provide for extraordinary maintenance interventions that might become necessary in order to ensure continuation of a public service.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba tudi, da bi pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila lahko na primer zajemale redno vzdrževanje in določale izredna vzdrževalna dela, ki bi lahko postala potrebna za zagotovitev neprekinjenega opravljanja javne storitve.
Contracting entities are sometimes faced with circumstances that require the early termination of public contracts in order to comply with obligations under Union law in the field of public procurement.
Včasih so naročniki soočeni z razmerami, zaradi katerih morajo predčasno odpovedati javna naročila, da bi izpolnili obveznosti v skladu s pravom Unije na področju javnega naročanja.
Member States should therefore ensure that contracting entities have the possibility, under the conditions determined by national law, to terminate a public contract during its term if so required by Union law.
Države članice bi torej morale zagotoviti, da imajo naročniki možnost, da pod pogoji, določenimi v nacionalnem pravu, odpovejo javno naročilo med njegovim izvajanjem, če to zahteva pravo Unije.
The results of the Commission staff working paper of 27 June 2011 entitled ‘Evaluation Report: Impact and Effectiveness of EU Public Procurement Legislation’ suggested that the exclusion of certain services from the full application of Directive 2004/17/EC should be reviewed.
Rezultati delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 27. junija 2011 z naslovom „Ocenjevalno poročilo: učinek in učinkovitost zakonodaje EU o javnem naročanju“ so nakazali, da bi bilo treba ponovno preučiti izključitev nekaterih storitev iz polne uporabe Direktive 2004/17/ES.
As a result, the full application of this Directive should be extended to a number of services.
Zato bi bilo treba celovito uporabo te direktive razširiti na več storitev.
Certain categories of services continue by their very nature to have a limited cross-border dimension, namely what are known as services to the person such as certain social, health and educational services.
Nekatere kategorije storitev imajo zaradi svoje narave še naprej omejeno čezmejno razsežnost, in sicer tako imenovane storitve za posameznika, kot so nekatere socialne, zdravstvene in izobraževalne storitve.
A specific regime should therefore be established for contracts for those services, with a higher threshold than that which applies to other services.
Zato bi bilo treba za javna naročila takšnih storitev določiti posebno ureditev in višjo mejno vrednostjo od tiste, ki se uporablja za ostale storitve.
In the particular context of procurement in those sectors, services to the person with values below that threshold will typically not be of interest to providers from other Member States unless there are concrete indications to the contrary, such as Union financing for cross-border projects.
Kar zadeva samo javno naročanje v teh sektorjih, storitve za posameznika – če gre za vrednosti pod to mejno vrednostjo – navadno ne bodo zanimive za ponudnike iz drugih držav članic, razen če obstajajo konkretni znaki, da tako zanimanje obstaja, na primer financiranje čezmejnih projektov s strani Unije.
Contracts for services to the person above that threshold should be subject to Union-wide transparency.
Za javna naročila storitev za posameznika nad to mejno vrednostjo bi morale veljati zahteve po transparentnosti na ravni celotne Unije.