natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the use of the lesser duty rule and the fact that the definitive subsidy margins are lower than the injury elimination level, it is considered appropriate to impose a definitive countervailing duty at the level of the established definitive subsidy margins and then impose a definitive anti-dumping duty up to the relevant injury elimination level.
Ob uporabi pravila nižje dajatve in glede na dejstvo, da je dokončna stopnja subvencije nižja od stopnje odprave škode, se zdi primerno uvesti dokončno izravnalno dajatev v višini ugotovljenih dokončnih stopenj subvencije in nato uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev do višine ustrezne stopnje odprave škode.
Other co-operating companies in the anti-dumping investigation (with the exception of the companies subject to the residual duty in the parallel anti- subsidy Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 [18]) (Annex I)
Druge sodelujoče družbe v protidampinški preiskavi (razen družb, za katere velja stopnja preostale dajatve v vzporedni protisubvencijski Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 1239/2013 [18]) (Priloga I)
Other co-operating companies in the anti-dumping investigation, subject to the residual duty in the parallel anti- subsidy Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 (Annex II)
Druge sodelujoče družbe v protidampinški preiskavi, za katere velja stopnja preostale dajatve v vzporedni protisubvencijski Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 1239/2013 (Priloga II)
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of the products originating in the PRC and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatev (v nasprotju z dajatvijo na ravni države, ki se uporablja za „vse ostale družbe“) se tako uporabljajo izključno za uvoz zadevnih izdelkov s poreklom iz LRK, ki jih proizvajajo te družbe, torej poimensko navedene pravne osebe.
Imports of the product concerned manufactured by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki v izvedbenem delu te uredbe ni izrecno navedena z nazivom in naslovom, vključno s subjekti, ki so povezani s katerim koli izrecno navedenim subjektom, teh stopenj ne morejo uporabiti in zanje velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse ostale družbe“.
Following disclosure, the GOC argued that the weighted average duty rate for the companies listed in Annex I and Annex II is in violation of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement, since it is allegedly based on the weighted average of the duties calculated separately for the sampled exporting producers of cells and modules.
Po dokončnem razkritju je kitajska vlada trdila, da je tehtano povprečje stopnje dajatve za družbe iz Priloge I in Priloge II v nasprotju s protidampinškim sporazumom STO, saj naj bi temeljilo na tehtanem povprečju dajatev, ki je bil ločeno izračunan za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike za celice in module.
This assessment is, however, incorrect.
Vendar je ta ocena napačna.
For the sampled exporting producers, a uniform duty rate has been calculated for all their exports of the product concerned — and the majority of exporting producers did export cells and modules.
Za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike je bila enotna stopnja dajatve izračunana za ves njihov izvoz zadevnega izdelka in večina proizvajalcev izvoznikov je izvažala celice in module.
The assessment that duties were separately calculated for exporting producers of cells and modules is therefore incorrect, and the argument can therefore not be accepted.
Ocena, da so bile dajatve ločeno izračunane za proizvajalce izvoznike za celice in module, je torej napačna, zato te trditve ni mogoče sprejeti.
Any claim requesting the application of an individual anti-dumping duty rate (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for instance, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo stopnje protidampinške dajatve za posamezno družbo (npr. zaradi spremembe imena subjekta ali ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) se takoj naslovi na Komisijo skupaj z vsemi ustreznimi informacijami, zlasti o kakršni koli spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje, domače prodaje in izvoza, povezanimi na primer z navedeno spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
In order to ensure equal treatment between any new exporters and the cooperating companies not included in the sample, mentioned in Annex I and Annex II to this Regulation, provision should be made for the weighted average duty imposed on the latter companies to be applied to any new exporters which would otherwise be entitled to a review pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Za zagotovitev enake obravnave morebitnih novih izvoznikov in sodelujočih družb, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec in so navedene v Prilogi I in Prilogi II k tej uredbi, je treba določiti, da se tehtana povprečna dajatev, uvedena za navedene družbe, uporablja tudi za morebitne nove izvoznike, ki bi bili drugače upravičeni do pregleda v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
Measures are imposed to allow the producers in the Union to recover from the injurious effect of dumping.
Da bi si proizvajalci Unije lahko opomogli od škodljivega učinka dampinga, se uvedejo ukrepi.
To the extent that there would be any initial imbalance between the potential benefit for producers in the Union and the cost for other economic operators in the Union, this imbalance could be offset by an increase and/or restart of the production in the Union.
Če bi nastalo začetno neravnotežje med morebitno koristjo za proizvajalce v Uniji in stroški za druge gospodarske subjekte v Uniji, bi to neravnotežje lahko odpravili s povečanjem in/ali ponovnim začetkom proizvodnje v Uniji.
However, the envisaged scenario of increased production in the Union may not be in line with the market development in this volatile market.
Vendar predvideni scenarij večje proizvodnje v Uniji morda ni v skladu z razvojem trga na tem nestanovitnem trgu.
As indicated in recital (108) to the provisional Regulation, Union consumption of modules increased by 264 % between 2009 and 2011, only to decrease by 43 percentage points during the 6 month period between 2011 and the IP.
Kot je prikazano v uvodni izjavi (108) začasne uredbe, se je potrošnja modulov v Uniji med letoma 2009 in 2011 povečala za 264 %, nato pa se je v šestih mesecih letom 2011 in OP zmanjšala za 43 odstotnih točk.
The volatility is even more impressive when looking at the period of 2006-2011, where the Union consumption of modules increased from less than 1 GW to almost 20 GW or an increase of around 2000 % in just five years.
Nestanovitnost je še bolj očitna, če se prouči obdobje med leti 2006 in 2011, ko se je potrošnja za module v Uniji povečala z manj kot 1 GW na skoraj 20 GW, kar je približno 2000-odstotno povečanje v samo petih letih.
This volatility is expected to continue, and forecasts published by business associations show differences of 100 % and more between the different scenarios even for the medium term period of 2014-2015.
Pričakuje se, da se bo ta nestanovitnost nadaljevala, in napovedi, ki so jih objavila poslovna združenja, kažejo razlikovanja za 100 % in več med različnimi scenariji tudi za srednjeročno obdobje 2014–2015.
For these reasons, it is considered appropriate, in such exceptional circumstances, to limit the duration of measures to a period of two years only.
Zato se zdi primerno, da se v takih izjemnih okoliščinah trajanje ukrepov omeji le na dve leti.
This period should be enough for the producers in the Union to increase and/or restart their production, while at the same time not significantly endanger the situation of other economic operators in the Union.
To obdobje bi moralo zadostovati, da proizvajalci v Uniji povečajo in/ali ponovno začnejo svojo proizvodnjo, obenem pa ne bo bistveno ogrozilo položaja drugih gospodarskih subjektov v Uniji.
It is considered that the period of two years will be the most appropriate to analyse whether the imposition of measures had indeed the effect of increasing European production and thereby balancing the negative effects on other economic operators in the Union.
Šteje se, da bo obdobje dveh let najbolj ustrezno za analizo vprašanja, ali je bil učinek uvedbe ukrepov dejansko povečanje evropske proizvodnje in s tem izravnava negativnih učinkov na druge gospodarske subjekte v Uniji.
Following final disclosure, one Union producer raised the argument that the limited duration of 2 years is too short to recover from the injury suffered.
En proizvajalec Unije je po dokončnem razkritju trdil, da je trajanje ukrepov, omejeno na obdobje dveh let, prekratko za okrevanje po povzročeni škodi.
In addition it was argued that a duration of 2 years would not allow Union producers to file business plans for the current and the coming business year.
Poleg tega se je trdilo, da obdobje dveh let ni dovolj, da bi proizvajalci Unije lahko vložili poslovne načrte za sedanje in naslednje poslovno leto.
In this respect, it is noted that the duration of the measures until December 2015, which should be sufficient for Union producers to file business plans until 2015.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da ukrepi trajajo do decembra 2015, kar bi moralo biti dovolj, da lahko proizvajalci Unije poslovne načrte vložijo do leta 2015.
Furthermore, the Union producer did not contest the reasons for which the duration was limited to two years, notably the volatility of the market.
Poleg tega proizvajalec Unije ni izpodbijal razlogov, zaradi katerih je bilo trajanje omejeno na dve leti, zlasti nestanovitnosti trga.
The producer even explicitly appreciated a review in case the measures need to be changed due to changed market situation.
Proizvajalec je celo strinjal z možnostjo, da se opravi pregled, če bo treba ukrepe spremeniti zaradi spremenjenega tržnega položaja.
Since the likelihood of a change in market circumstances within two years is indeed high in this volatile market, it is considered appropriate to limit the measures to two years from the outset.
Ker je na tem nestanovitnem trgu verjetnost spremembe tržnih razmer v dveh letih res velika, se zdi primerno, da se trajanje ukrepov že na začetku omeji na dve leti.
Following final disclosure, the complainant argued that two years are insufficient to invest in production, referring to recital (424) above.
Po dokončnem razkritju je pritožnik trdil, da obdobje dveh let ne zadostuje za vlaganje v proizvodnjo, in se skliceval na uvodno izjavo (424).
However, due to the substantial spare capacity of the Union industry, an increase in production can be done through a better utilisation of the existing production capacities, which should be feasible without significant additional investments.
Vendar je zaradi znatne neizkoriščene zmogljivosti industrije Unije proizvodnjo mogoče povečati z večjo uporabo obstoječih proizvodnih zmogljivosti, kar bi moralo biti izvedljivo brez znatnih dodatnih naložb.
The complainant further argued that an imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties for a period of two years is insufficient for the Union Industry to recover from the injurious effects of past dumping.
Pritožnik je nadalje trdil, da uvedba dokončnih protidampinških dajatev za obdobje dveh let ne zadostuje za okrevanje industrije Unije po škodi, ki jo je utrpela zaradi preteklega dampinga.
However, the imposition of anti-dumping duties cannot only look at the interests of the Union Industry alone, but needs to balance the potential benefit for producers in the Union and the cost for other economic operators in the Union.
Uvedba protidampinških dajatev pa ne more temeljiti samo na interesih industrije Unije, ampak mora uravnovesiti morebitne ugodnosti za proizvajalce v Uniji in stroške za druge gospodarske subjekte v Uniji.
On this basis, the decision to limit measures to two years is maintained.
Na podlagi tega se odločitev o omejitvi ukrepov na dve leti ohrani.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of crystalline silicon PV modules or panels and cells of the type used in crystalline silicon PV modules or panels, originating in or consigned from the PRC and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way to the provisional duty (final disclosure).
Vse strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov ali panelov iz kristalnega silicija in vrste celic, ki se uporabljajo v fotonapetostnih modulih ali panelih iz kristalnega silicija, s poreklom iz LRK ali ki so od tam poslani, ter dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo („dokončno razkritje“).
As concerns a possible retroactive application of anti-dumping measures, the criteria set out in Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation have to be evaluated.
Glede morebitne retroaktivne uporabe protidampinških ukrepov je treba proučiti pogoje iz člena 10(4) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 10(4)(b), one key criterion which needs to be fulfilled is that there is ‘a further substantial rise in imports’‘in addition to the level of imports which caused injury during the investigation period’.
V skladu s členom 10(4)(b) mora biti izpolnjen bistven pogoj, da „poleg ravni uvoza, ki je povzročal škodo v teku obdobja preiskave, obstaja nadaljnja znatna rast uvoza“.
A comparison of monthly average imports [19] of modules and cells with monthly average imports for the period under registration (March 2013 — June 2013) shows a sharp decrease of import volumes after the IP.
Primerjava med povprečnim mesečnim uvozom [19] modulov in celic ter povprečnim mesečnim uvozom za obdobje, v katerem se zahteva registracija (marec 2013–junij 2013), kaže na znatno zmanjšanje obsega uvoza po OP.
Indeed, as stated in recital (110) to the provisional Regulation, the monthly average import quantity of Chinese modules and cells amounted to 1250 MW [20] during the IP.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (110) začasne uredbe, je povprečna mesečna količina uvoza kitajskih modulov in celic v OP znašala 1250 MW [20].
For comparison, during the period of registration the monthly average import volume of Chinese modules and cells was only around half as high.
V primerjavi s tem je bil povprečni mesečni obseg uvoza kitajskih modulov in celic v obdobju registracije približno pol manjši.
Alternatively, given the volatile nature of the market, the further substantial rise in imports could be assessed in relative rather than absolute terms.
Druga možnost je, da se glede na nestanovitnost trga nadaljnja znatna rast uvoza oceni v relativnem namesto absolutnem smislu.
To assess whether there is a further substantial rise in imports in relative terms, it is necessary to compare the import volumes with the consumption on the Union market, i.e. the consumption would have to decrease at a substantially higher rate than the decrease in Chinese imports.
Da se oceni, ali obstaja nadaljnja znatna rast uvoza v relativnem smislu, je treba primerjati obseg uvoza s potrošnjo na trgu Unije, tj. potrošnja bi se morala zmanjšati veliko hitreje kot kitajski uvoz.
Since the import volume of Chinese modules and cells during the period of registration was only half as high as during the IP, this decrease in consumption would need to be substantially higher than 50 %.
Ker je obseg uvoza kitajskih modulov in celic v obdobju registracije za polovico manjši kot v OP, bi moralo biti to zmanjšanje potrošnje precej večje od 50 %.
While no precise information concerning the consumption during the period under registration is available, there are no indications that the consumption decreased by more than 50 %.
Medtem ko natančni podatki o potrošnji v obdobju registracije niso na voljo, ni videti, da bi se potrošnja zmanjšala za več kot 50 %.
For the reasons stated above, the criterion concerning a further substantial rise in imports is therefore not met.
Iz navedenih razlogov pogoj glede nadaljnje znatne rasti uvoza ni izpolnjen.
As a consequence, it is concluded that the definitive anti-dumping duty shall not be levied retroactively prior to the date of application of provisional measures.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se dokončna protidampinška dajatev ne obračuna retroaktivno za obdobje pred datumom začetka uporabe začasnih ukrepov.
H. FORM OF THE MEASURES
H. OBLIKA UKREPOV
Subsequent to the adoption of the provisional anti-dumping measures, a group of cooperating exporting producers, including their related companies in the PRC and in the European Union, and together with the CCCME offered a joint price undertaking in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Po sprejetju začasnih protidampinških ukrepov je skupina sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, vključno z njihovimi povezanimi družbami v LRK in Evropski uniji, ter skupaj s CCCME, ponudila skupno cenovno zavezo v skladu s členom 8(1) osnovne uredbe.
The undertaking offer was also supported by the Chinese authorities.
Ponujeno zavezo so podprle tudi kitajske oblasti.
The Commission examined the offer, and by Decision 2013/423/EU accepted this undertaking offer.
Komisija je proučila ponudbo in s Sklepom 2013/423/EU sprejela ponujeno zavezo.
As already indicated in recitals (3), (4) and (7) of this Decision, in order to assess whether the price undertaking removes the injurious effect of dumping, the Commission has analysed any changed market circumstances of a lasting nature concerning, inter alia, the current export prices and the injury elimination level which was found lower than the level of dumping.
Kot je že navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (3), (4) in (7) tega sklepa, je Komisija za oceno, ali cenovna zaveza odpravlja škodljivi učinek dampinga, proučila vse trajno spremenjene tržne okoliščine, med drugim v zvezi s sedanjimi izvoznimi cenami in stopnjo odprave škode, ki se je izkazala za nižjo od stopnje dampinga.
Subsequent to Decision 2013/423/EU, the exporting producers together with CCCME submitted a notification to amend their initial undertaking offer.
Po Sklepu 2013/423/EU so proizvajalci izvozniki skupaj s CCCME predložili obvestilo o spremembi svoje začetne ponujene zaveze.
They requested to revise the undertaking to take account of the exclusion of wafers from the product scope as described in recitals (31) and (72).
Zahtevali so spremembo zaveze, pri kateri bi se upoštevala izključitev rezin iz obsega izdelka, kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah (31) in (72).
In addition, a number of additional exporters, within the deadline stipulated in Article 8(2) of the basic Regulation, requested to be included in the undertaking.
Poleg tega je veliko dodatnih izvoznikov v roku, določenem v členu 8(2) osnovne uredbe, zahtevalo vključitev v zavezo.
By Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU, the Commission confirmed the acceptance of the undertaking offered by exporters listed in the Annex to that Decision with regards to the definitive duties,
Komisija je z Izvedbenim sklepom 2013/707/EU potrdila sprejetje zaveze, ki so jo ponudili izvozniki iz Priloge k navedenemu sklepu glede na dokončne dajatve –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules or panels and cells of the type used in crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules or panels (the cells have a thickness not exceeding 400 micrometres), currently falling within CN codes ex85013100, ex85013200, ex85013300, ex85013400, ex85016120, ex85016180, ex85016200, ex85016300, ex85016400 and ex85414090 (TARIC codes 8501310081, 8501310089, 8501320041, 8501320049, 8501330061, 8501330069, 8501340041, 8501340049, 8501612041, 8501612049, 8501618041, 8501618049, 8501620061, 8501620069, 8501630041, 8501630049, 8501640041, 8501640049, 8541409021, 8541409029, 8541409031 and 854140290239) and originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China, unless they are in transit in the sense of Article V GATT.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov ali panelov iz kristalnega silicija in vrste celic, ki se uporabljajo v fotonapetostnih modulih ali panelih iz kristalnega silicija (celice so debeline največ 400 mikrometrov), ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznake KN ex85013100, ex85013200, ex85013300, ex85013400, ex85016120, ex85016180, ex85016200, ex85016300, ex85016400 in ex85414090 (oznake TARIC 8501310081, 8501310089, 8501320041, 8501320049, 8501330061, 8501330069, 8501340041, 8501340049, 8501612041, 8501612049, 8501618041, 8501618049, 8501620061, 8501620069, 8501630041, 8501630049, 8501640041, 8501640049, 8541409021, 8541409029, 8541409031 in 8541409039), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, razen če so v tranzitu v smislu člena V GATT.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, of the products described in paragraph 1 and produced by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnje dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporabljajo za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatve za izdelke iz odstavka 1, ki jih proizvajajo spodaj navedene družbe, so:
Other co-operating companies in the anti-dumping investigation (with the exception of the companies subject to the residual duty in the parallel anti-subsidy Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013) (Annex I)
Druge sodelujoče družbe v protidampinški preiskavi (razen družb, za katere velja stopnja preostale dajatve v vzporedni protisubvencijski Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 1239/2013) (Priloga I)
Other co-operating companies in the anti-dumping investigation, subject to the residual duty in the parallel anti-subsidy Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 (Annex II)
Druge sodelujoče družbe v protidampinški preiskavi, za katere velja stopnja preostale dajatve v vzporedni protisubvencijski Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 1239/2013 (Priloga II)
Where any new exporting producer in the People's Republic of China provides sufficient evidence to the Commission that:
Kadar novi proizvajalec izvoznik v Ljudski republiki Kitajski Komisiji zagotovi zadostne dokaze, da:
it did not export to the Union the product described in paragraph 1 in the period between 1 July 2011 and 30 June 2012 (investigation period),
v obdobju od 1. julija 2011 do 30. junija 2012 v Unijo ni izvažal izdelka iz odstavka 1 („obdobje preiskave“),
paragraph 2 may be amended by adding the new exporting producer to the cooperating companies not included in the sample and thus subject to the weighted average duty of 41,3 %.
odstavek 2 se lahko spremeni tako, da na seznam sodelujočih družb, ki niso vključene v vzorec in za katere velja tehtana povprečna stopnja dajatve v višini 41,3 %, doda novega proizvajalca izvoznika.
The amounts secured by way of the provisional anti- dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 on imports of wafers (the wafers have a thickness not exceeding 400 micrometers) and modules or panels with a output voltage not exceeding 50 V DC and a power output not exceeding 50 W solely for direct use as battery chargers in systems with the same voltage and power characteristics originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China shall be released.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 513/2013 o uvozu rezin (rezine so debeline največ 400 mikrometrov) in modulov ali panel z izhodno napetostjo, ki ne presega 50 V pri enosmernem toku, in izhodno močjo, ki ne presega 50 W, namenjeni izključno za neposredno polnjenje baterij v sistemih z enakimi značilnostmi glede napetosti in moči s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, se sprostijo.