natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following the final disclosure, the Union industry claimed that the profitability of the year 2010 should be used as the level of profitability that Union industry could reasonably achieve in the absence of dumped imports rather than the average profit margin of the years 2009 and 2010.
Industrija Unije je po dokončnem razkritju trdila, da bi bilo treba za raven dobičkonosnosti, ki bi jo industrija Unije lahko razumno dosegla v odsotnosti dampinškega uvoza, uporabiti dobičkonosnost iz leta 2010 in ne povprečno stopnjo dobička iz let 2009 in 2010.
In this respect, it was argued that, the profitability in 2009 was insufficient and the circumstances in the two years were clearly distinct given in particular the development in consumption in 2010 which alleviated the effects of dumping in that year.
V zvezi s tem se je trdilo, da je bila dobičkonosnost v letu 2009 nezadostna in da so se okoliščine v navedenih dveh letih jasno razlikovale, zlasti zaradi razvoja potrošnje v letu 2010, ki je omilil učinke dampinga v istem letu.
Yingli Energy (China) Co. Ltd
Yingli Energy (Kitajska) Co. Ltd
Yingli Energy (Beijing) Co. Ltd
Yingli Energy (Peking) Co. Ltd
Jetion Solar (China) Co. Ltd
Jetion Solar (Kitajska) Co. Ltd
Regarding the claim that information was missing from the open file, the interested party did not specify to which information it was referring to.
Glede trditve o manjkajočih informacijah v dokumentaciji, ki je bila na voljo, zainteresirana stran ni natančno navedla, na katere informacije se sklicuje.
Its claim that the non-confidential version of an entire questionnaire response has not been made available was incorrect.
Njena trditev, da nezaupna različica odziva na celotni vprašalnik ni bila na voljo, je napačna.
In order to ensure the Union producers' right to anonymity, it was also ascertained that the non-confidential versions of the questionnaires did indeed not reveal the identity of the Union producer concerned.
Da se zagotovi proizvajalcem Unije pravica do anonimnosti, je bilo tudi preverjeno, da nezaupne različice vprašalnikov niso razkrivale identitete zadevnega proizvajalca Unije.
In some cases, the non-confidential versions needed therefore to be corrected accordingly by the party submitting it before they could be made available for other interested parties.
V nekaterih primerih so morale strani svoje predložene nezaupne različice zato ustrezno popraviti, da so postale na voljo drugim zainteresiranim stranem.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1239/2013
imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1], and in particular Article 15 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], zlasti člena 15 Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga Evropske komisije po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom,
On 8 November 2012, the European Commission (the ‘Commission’) announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘Notice of Initiation’), the initiation of an anti-subsidy proceeding with regard to imports into the Union of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’ or the ‘country concerned’).
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 8. novembra 2012 v obvestilu, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala začetek protisubvencijskega postopka glede uvoza fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic in rezin) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „zadevna država“) v Unijo.
The anti-subsidy proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged on 26 September 2012 by EU ProSun (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing in this case more than 25 % of the total Union production of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components.
Protisubvencijski postopek je bil uveden na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 26. septembra 2012 vložilo združenje EU ProSun („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki v tem primeru predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje Unije fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov.
Prior to the initiation of the proceeding and in accordance with Article 10(7) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 (‘the basic Regulation’), the Commission notified the Government of the PRC (‘the GOC’) that it had received a properly documented complaint alleging that subsidised imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components originating in the PRC were causing material injury to the Union industry.
Pred začetkom postopka in v skladu s členom 10(7) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009, je Komisija vlado LRK („kitajska vlada“) obvestila, da je prejela pravilno dokumentirano pritožbo, v kateri se trdi, da subvencioniran uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov s poreklom iz LRK povzroča znatno škodo industriji Unije.
The GOC was invited for consultations with the aim of clarifying the situation as regards the contents of the complaint and arriving at a mutually agreed solution.
Kitajska vlada je bila povabljena na posvetovanja, da se razjasni položaj glede vsebine pritožbe in da se poišče sporazumna rešitev.
The GOC accepted the offer of consultations which were subsequently held.
Kitajska vlada je sprejela vabilo na posvetovanja, ki so se nato tudi izvedla.
During the consultations, no mutually agreed solution could be arrived at.
Na posvetovanjih sporazumna rešitev ni bila dosežena.
However, due note was taken of comments made by the GOC regarding the non-countervailability of the schemes listed in the complaint.
Vendar so se ustrezno upoštevale pripombe kitajske vlade v zvezi s shemami, proti katerim se lahko sprejmejo izravnalni ukrepi, naštetimi v pritožbi.
On 6 September 2012, the Commission had announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3], the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Union of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in the PRC.
Komisija je 6. septembra 2012 v obvestilu, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], napovedala začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom v Unijo fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic in rezin) s poreklom iz LRK.
On 6 June 2013, the Commission, by Commission Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 [4], imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the PRC (‘Provisional anti-dumping Regulation’).
Komisija je 6. junija 2013 z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 513/2013 [4] uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic in rezin) s poreklom iz LRK ali ki so od tam poslani („začasna protidampinška uredba“).
The injury analyses performed in the present anti-subsidy and the parallel anti-dumping investigation are based on the same definition of the Union industry, the representative Union producers and the investigation period and led to identical conclusions unless otherwise specified.
Analizi škode, izvedeni v tej protisubvencijski in vzporedni protidampinški preiskavi, temeljita na isti opredelitvi industrije Unije, reprezentativnih proizvajalcev Unije in obdobja preiskave ter sta privedli do enakih sklepov, če ni določeno drugače.
This was considered appropriate in order to streamline the injury analysis and to reach consistent findings in both proceedings.
To se je štelo za primerno zaradi poenostavitve analize škode ter doseganja doslednih ugotovitev v obeh postopkih.
For this reason, comments on injury aspects put forward in any of these proceedings were taken into account in both proceedings.
Zaradi tega so bile pripombe glede vidikov škode, predložene v katerem koli od teh dveh postopkov, upoštevane v obeh postopkih.
Following a request by the complainant supported by the required evidence the Commission adopted on 1 March 2013 Commission Regulation (EU) No 182/2013 [5] making imports of crystalline silicon PV modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the PRC subject to registration as of 6 March 2013.
Na podlagi zahtevka pritožnika, podprtega z zahtevanimi dokazili, je Komisija 1. marca 2013 sprejela Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 182/2013 [5] o registraciji uvoza fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic in rezin) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, ki se uporablja od 6. marca 2013.
Some interested parties claimed that the decision for registration of imports was unfounded, as the conditions were not met pursuant to Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da je odločitev o registraciji uvoza neutemeljena, saj pogoji niso bili izpolnjeni v skladu s členom 24(5) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission officially advised the complainants, other known Union producers, the known exporting producers in the PRC, the PRC authorities and known importers of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila pritožnike, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, znane proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, organe LRK in znane uvoznike.
In view of the apparent high number of exporting producers, Union producers and unrelated importers, all known exporting producers and unrelated importers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the Notice of Initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the investigation period as defined in recital (38) below.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov, proizvajalcev Unije in nepovezanih uvoznikov je Komisija pozvala vse znane proizvajalce izvoznike in nepovezane uvoznike, naj se ji javijo in ji v skladu z obvestilom o začetku predložijo osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom, v obdobju preiskave, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (38).
The authorities of the PRC were also consulted.
Posvetovanje je bilo opravljeno tudi z organi LRK.
Initially 121 Chinese exporting producers/groups of producers provided the requested information and agreed to be included in a sample.
Na začetku je 121 kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov/skupin proizvajalcev zagotovilo zahtevane informacije in se strinjalo z vključitvijo v vzorec.
The cooperating companies represent more than 80 % of the total Chinese export volume.
Sodelujoče družbe predstavljajo več kot 80 % celotnega obsega kitajskega izvoza.
On the basis of the information received from the exporting producers and in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation the Commission initially proposed a sample of seven exporting producers/groups of exporting producers.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci izvozniki, in v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej predlagala vzorec sedmih proizvajalcev izvoznikov/skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The sample of these seven groups of exporting producers served as the basis to determine the level of subsidisation for those groups as well as the level of subsidisation for all cooperating exporting producers not included in the sample, as required by Articles 15(2) and 15(3) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi vzorca teh sedmih skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov se je določila raven subvencioniranja za navedene skupine in tudi za vse sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, ki niso vključeni v vzorec, kot je določeno v členu 15(2) in (3) osnovne uredbe.
As explained in recital (46) below, the Commission excluded wafers from the product scope in the definitive stage of the investigation.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (46), je Komisija v zaključni fazi preiskave iz obsega izdelka izključila rezine.
Certain companies were selected into the sample on the basis of their largest volumes of exports of wafers.
Nekatere družbe so bile izbrane v vzorec na podlagi največjega obsega izvoza rezin.
However, taking into account the fact that the Commission had already investigated these companies, verified the data submitted by them and also the fact that all of these companies had significant exports of modules and/or cells it was not deemed necessary to amend the sample.
Vendar se ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je Komisija že preiskala te družbe in preverila podatke, ki so jih predložili, pa tudi dejstva, da so vse te družbe imele pomemben izvoz modulov in/ali celic, sprememba vzorca ni zdela potrebna.
The number of sampled exporting producers was eventually deemed to be eight companies/groups.
Število vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov se je na koncu povečalo na osem družb/skupin.
This is because, although it was initially reported that the Jinko Solar Co. Ltd and Renesola Jiangsu Ltd were related, it was subsequently established that they were not.
Razlog za to je, da sta bili po prvotnem poročanju družbi Jinko Solar Co. Ltd in Renesola Jiangsu Ltd povezani, naknadno pa je bilo ugotovljeno, da nista.
All known Union producers and known producers' association were informed about the selection of the provisional sample of Union producers.
Vsi znani proizvajalci Unije in znana združenja proizvajalcev so bili obveščeni o izboru začasnega vzorca proizvajalcev Unije.
This provisional sample consisted of nine Union producers out of the around 215 Union producers that were known prior to the initiation of the investigation to produce the like product, selected on the basis of the largest representative volume of production, taking into account the sales volume and the geographical location that could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Ta začasni vzorec je sestavljalo 9 od približno 215 proizvajalcev Unije, za katere je bilo pred začetkom preiskave znano, da proizvajajo podobni izdelek, in ki so bili izbrani na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega proizvodnje ob upoštevanju obsega prodaje in zemljepisne lege ter jih je bilo mogoče ustrezno preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
Several interested parties raised the following objections concerning the provisional sample of Union producers:
Več zainteresiranih strani je navedlo naslednje ugovore glede začasnega vzorca proizvajalcev Unije:
Some parties submitted that the limited information provided with regard to the provisionally selected sample was insufficient and prevented them from making any meaningful comments on the proposed sample.
Nekatere strani so pripomnile, da so omejene informacije v zvezi z začasno izbranim vzorcem nezadostne in da zato ne morejo podati smiselnih pripomb o predlaganem vzorcu.
In particular, they criticised that the identity of the Union producers was kept confidential and requested that the Member States where the sampled Union producers were located should be disclosed, as well as the selected Union producers' share of production in the total production volume of PV modules and cells and the percentage of production and sales represented by the sampled companies individually and by the sample as a whole.
Zlasti so bile kritične, da je identiteta proizvajalcev Unije zaupna, in so zahtevale, naj se razkrijejo države članice, v katerih so sedeži proizvajalcev Unije, pa tudi deleži proizvodnje izbranih proizvajalcev Unije glede na celotni obseg proizvodnje fotonapetostnih modulov in celic ter odstotki proizvodnje in prodaje za posamezne vzorčene družbe in za vzorec kot celoto.
The method used for the selection of the sample was contested on the grounds that it ‘confuses three different steps’, namely the support for the initiation of the investigation, definition of the Union industry and sampling.
Izpodbijala se je metoda za izbor vzorca, saj naj bi „zamešala tri različne korake“, in sicer podporo za začetek preiskave, opredelitev industrije Unije in vzorčenje.
Without defining the Union industry at sampling stage, interested parties were prevented from verifying whether the provisional sample was representative, and thus whether on the basis of the sample, the situation of the Union industry during the investigation period as defined in recital (38) below could be correctly assessed.
Brez opredelitve industrije Unije v fazi vzorčenja zainteresirane strani niso mogle preveriti, ali je začasni vzorec reprezentativen in ali je na podlagi vzorca mogoče pravilno oceniti stanje industrije Unije v obdobju preiskave, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (38).
Furthermore, it was claimed that it was inappropriate to select the provisional sample on the basis of the replies of the Union producers to the examination of the support for the initiation of the investigation.
Poleg tega so trdile, da začasnega vzorca ni primerno izbrati na podlagi odgovorov proizvajalcev Unije na proučitev podpore za začetek preiskave.
One party claimed that, since vertically integrated companies are included in the provisional sample, the production volume of cells may be double or triple counted which casts doubts on the overall representativity of the sample.
Ena stran je trdila, da bi se lahko obseg proizvodnje celic glede na to, da začasni vzorec vključuje vertikalno integrirane družbe, štel dvakrat ali trikrat, kar vzbuja dvom o splošni reprezentativnosti vzorca.
It was requested that for vertically integrated producers only the production volume of modules should be counted, but not the volume of cells.
Zahtevala je, naj se za vertikalno integrirane proizvajalce šteje samo obseg proizvodnje modulov, ne pa tudi obseg proizvodnje celic.
The arguments raised by the parties were addressed as follows: The Union producers requested that their names be kept confidential due to the risk of retaliation.
Argumenti, ki so jih navedle strani, so bili obravnavani na naslednji način: proizvajalci Unije so zahtevali, naj njihova imena ostanejo zaupna zaradi tveganja povračilnih ukrepov.
All available information concerning the Union producers, including information provided in the complaint and data collected from Union producers and other parties before the initiation of the investigation, was used in order to provisionally establish the total Union production for the investigation period, as defined in recital (38) below.
Vse razpoložljive informacije o proizvajalcih Unije, vključno z informacijami iz pritožbe in podatki, pridobljenimi od proizvajalcev Unije in drugih strani pred začetkom preiskave, so se uporabile za začasno določitev celotne proizvodnje Unije v obdobju preiskave, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (38).
All Union producers that replied to questions related to the support for the initiation of the investigation were considered for the sample, regardless of whether they supported, opposed or expressed no opinion on the investigation.
Vsi proizvajalci Unije, ki so odgovorili na vprašanja v zvezi s podporo za začetek preiskave, so bili obravnavani za vključitev v vzorec, in sicer ne glede na to, ali so podpirali preiskavo ali ji nasprotovali ali o njej niso izrazili mnenja.
It appeared that excluding production and sales of cells of the vertically integrated Union producers would not take into consideration the part of the production of cells sold on the free market.
Zdelo se je, da se zaradi izključitve proizvodnje in prodaje celic vertikalno integriranih proizvajalcev Unije ne bi upošteval del proizvodnje celic, prodanih na prostem trgu.
It was therefore considered that excluding sales of cells from the total production volume would not necessarily lead to a more representative sample.
Zato se je štelo, da izključitev prodaje celic iz skupnega obsega proizvodnje ne bi nujno pomenila bolj reprezentativnega vzorca.
On this basis, it was considered that the methodology to select the provisional sample was reasonable and the sample is therefore considered representative for the Union industry of the product under investigation as a whole.
Na podlagi tega se je štelo, da je bila metodologija za izbor začasnega vzorca primerna in vzorec se zato šteje za reprezentativnega za celotno industrijo Unije izdelka v preiskavi.
As far as the reliability of data is concerned, the sample was selected on the basis of the information available at the time of the selection of the sample as provided for in Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Kar zadeva zanesljivost podatkov, je bil vzorec izbran na podlagi informacij, ki so bile na voljo v času izbora vzorca, kot je določeno v členu 27 osnovne uredbe.
Concerning the list of around 150 additional Union producers, it should be noted that this information was submitted far outside the deadline set for interested parties to comment on the selection of the provisional sample and for Union producers to come forward and to request to be selected in the sample.
Glede seznama dodatnih približno 150 proizvajalcev Unije je treba poudariti, da so bile te informacije predložene krepko po roku, do katerega bi morale zainteresirane strani predložiti svoje pripombe v zvezi z začasnim vzorcem ter do katerega bi se morali proizvajalci Unije javiti in zahtevati vključitev v vzorec.
This revised sample consisted thus of ten companies, selected on the basis of the largest representative volume for each level of production, taking into account sales volume on the Union market and geographical location that could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Ta spremenjeni vzorec je bil torej sestavljen iz desetih družb, izbranih na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega za vsako raven proizvodnje ob upoštevanju obsega prodaje na trgu Unije in zemljepisne lege, ki jih je bilo mogoče v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati.
Further to the exclusion of wafers from the definition of the product concerned, and thus from the scope of this investigation (see recitals (42) — (46) — and (349) below), the sample consisted of eight companies.
Po izključitvi rezin iz opredelitve zadevnega izdelka in torej iz obsega te preiskave (glej uvodne izjave od (42) do (46) in (349)) je vzorec sestavljalo osem družb.
As a result, the revised sample of Union producers accounted, expressed as a percentage of out of the total Union production, between 18 % and 21 % for modules and between 17 % and 24 % for cells and covered vertically integrated and non-integrated producers.
Zato je revidirani vzorec proizvajalcev Unije, izražen kot odstotek celotne proizvodnje Unije, znašal med 18 % in 21 % za module in med 17 % in 24 % za celice ter zajemal vertikalno integrirane in neintegrirane proizvajalce.
The Union producers who supplied the Commission with information required for the selection of a sample in the present anti-subsidy proceeding coincide with the Union producers who supplied the relevant information in the parallel on-going anti-dumping investigation.
Proizvajalci Unije, ki so Komisiji posredovali informacije, zahtevane za izbor vzorca, v sedanjem protisubvencijskem postopku sovpadajo s proizvajalci Unije, ki so predložili ustrezne informacije v vzporedni tekoči protidampinški preiskavi.
Furthermore, all Union producers selected in the final sample in the anti-dumping investigation have supplied the relevant information in the present anti-subsidy investigation which allowed the Commission to select a sample.
Poleg tega so vsi proizvajalci Unije, izbrani v končnem vzorcu v protidampinški preiskavi, predložili ustrezne informacije v sedanji protisubvencijski preiskavi, kar je Komisiji omogočilo izbiro vzorca.