natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to encourage a greater quality orientation of public procurement, Member States should be permitted to prohibit or restrict use of price only or cost only to assess the most economically advantageous tender where they deem this appropriate.
Da bi spodbudili javno naročanje, bolj usmerjeno v kakovost, bi morali državam članicam dovoliti, da prepovejo ali omejijo uporabo merila izključno cenovne ali stroškovne učinkovitosti pri oceni ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe, če se jim to zdi primerno.
To ensure compliance with the principle of equal treatment in the award of contracts, contracting authorities should be obliged to create the necessary transparency to enable all tenderers to be reasonably informed of the criteria and arrangements which will be applied in the contract award decision.
Da bi zagotovili upoštevanje načela enake obravnave pri oddaji javnih naročil, bi morali javni naročniki uvesti potrebno transparentnost, da bi lahko bili vsi ponudniki ustrezno obveščeni o merilih in ureditvah, ki se bodo uporabljali pri odločanju o oddaji javnega naročila.
Contracting authorities should therefore be obliged to indicate the contract award criteria and the relative weighting given to each of those criteria.
Javni naročniki bi zato morali navesti merila za oddajo javnega naročila in relativne ponderje za vsakega od teh meril.
Contracting authorities should, however, be permitted to derogate from that obligation to indicate the weighting of the criteria in duly justified cases for which they must be able to give reasons, where the weighting cannot be established in advance, in particular because of the complexity of the contract.
Javnim naročnikom pa bi morali dovoliti, da v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih, ki jih morajo biti sposobni obrazložiti, odstopajo od obveznosti navedbe ponderjev za merila, kadar je ponderje nemogoče določiti vnaprej, zlasti zaradi kompleksnosti javnega naročila.
In such cases, they should indicate the criteria in decreasing order of importance.
V takih primerih bi morali navesti merila v padajočem zaporedju po pomembnosti.
Article 11 TFEU requires that environmental protection requirements be integrated into the definition and implementation of the Union policies and activities, in particular with a view to promoting sustainable development.
Člen 11 PDEU zahteva, da je treba zahteve varstva okolja vključevati v opredelitve in izvajanje politik in dejavnosti Unije, zlasti zaradi spodbujanja trajnostnega razvoja.
This Directive clarifies how the contracting authorities can contribute to the protection of the environment and the promotion of sustainable development, whilst ensuring that they can obtain the best value for money for their contracts.
Ta direktiva pojasnjuje, kako lahko javni naročniki prispevajo k varstvu okolja in spodbujanju trajnostnega razvoja, ter hkrati zagotavlja, da lahko za svoja javna naročila dosežejo najboljše razmerje med kakovostjo in ceno.
When assessing the best price-quality ratio contracting authorities should determine the economic and qualitative criteria linked to the subject-matter of the contract that they will use for that purpose.
Javni naročniki bi morali pri ocenjevanju najboljšega razmerja med ceno in kakovostjo določiti ekonomska in kakovostna merila, povezana s predmetom naročila, ki jih bodo uporabili v ta namen.
Those criteria should thus allow for a comparative assessment of the level of performance offered by each tender in the light of the subject-matter of the contract, as defined in the technical specifications.
Ta merila bi morala zato omogočati primerjalno oceno ravni izvedbe, ki jo ponuja posamezni ponudnik, glede na predmet naročila, kakor je opredeljeno v tehničnih specifikacijah.
In the context of the best price-quality ratio, a non-exhaustive list of possible award criteria which include environmental and social aspects is set out in this Directive.
V tej direktivi je v zvezi z najboljšim razmerjem med ceno in kakovostjo določen neizčrpen seznam možnih meril za oddajo javnega naročila, ki zajemajo okoljske in socialne vidike.
Contracting authorities should be encouraged to choose award criteria that allow them to obtain high-quality works, supplies and services that are optimally suited to their needs.
Javne naročnike bi bilo treba spodbuditi, da izberejo merila za oddajo, ki jim bodo omogočila pridobitev visokokakovostnih gradenj, blaga in storitev, ki najbolj ustrezajo njihovim potrebam.
The chosen award criteria should not confer an unrestricted freedom of choice on the contracting authority and they should ensure the possibility of effective and fair competition and be accompanied by arrangements that allow the information provided by the tenderers to be effectively verified.
Izbrana merila za oddajo javnemu naročniku ne bi smela omogočati neomejene svobode izbire in bi morala zagotoviti možnost učinkovite in poštene konkurence, dopolnjevati pa bi jih morale ureditev, ki bi omogočala učinkovito preverjanje informacij, ki jih predložijo ponudniki.
To identify the most economically advantageous tender, the contract award decision should not be based on non-cost criteria only.
Da bi ugotovili, katera ponudba je ekonomsko najugodnejša, odločitev o oddaji javnega naročila ne bi smela temeljiti le na merilih, ki niso povezana s stroški.
Qualitative criteria should therefore be accompanied by a cost criterion that could, at the choice of the contracting authority, be either the price or a cost-effectiveness approach such as life-cycle costing.
Kakovostna merila bi torej moralo dopolnjevati merilo stroškov, kar bi lahko bila – po izbiri javnega naročnika – cena ali pristop stroškovne učinkovitosti, na primer izračun stroškov v življenjski dobi.
However, the award criteria should not affect the application of national provisions determining the remuneration of certain services or setting out fixed prices for certain supplies.
Vendar merila za oddajo ne bi smela vplivati na uporabo nacionalnih predpisov, ki določajo plačilo nekaterih storitev ali postavljajo fiksne cene za določeno blago.
Where national provisions determine the remuneration of certain services or set out fixed prices for certain supplies, it should be clarified that it remains possible to assess value for money on the basis of other factors than solely the price or remuneration.
Če nacionalni predpisi določajo plačilo nekaterih storitev ali postavljajo fiksne cene za določeno blago, bi bilo treba pojasniti, da je še vedno mogoče oceniti razmerje med kakovostjo in ceno na podlagi drugih dejavnikov kot zgolj ceni ali plačilu.
Depending on the service or product concerned, such factors could, for instance, include conditions of delivery and payment, aspects of after-sale service (e.g. the extent of advisory and replacement services) or environmental or social aspects (e.g. whether books were stamped on recycled paper or paper from sustainable timber, the cost imputed to environmental externalities or whether the social integration of disadvantaged persons or members of vulnerable groups amongst the persons assigned to performing the contract has been furthered).
Glede na zadevno storitev ali proizvod bi taki dejavniki lahko na primer vključevali pogoje dobave in plačila, vidike, povezane s poprodajnimi storitvami (na primer obseg svetovalnih in nadomestnih storitev), ali okoljske oziroma socialne vidike (na primer ali so knjige tiskane na recikliranem papirju ali papirju, pridobljenem s trajnostno proizvodnjo lesa, stroški iz naslova zunanjih okoljskih vplivov, ali se je spodbujalo družbeno vključevanje prikrajšanih oseb ali pripadnikov ranljivih skupin med osebe, zadolžene za izvedbo javnega naročila).
Given the numerous possibilities of evaluating value for money on the basis of substantive criteria, recourse to drawing of lots as the sole means of awarding the contract should be avoided.
Glede na to, da obstajajo številne možnosti za oceno razmerja med kakovostjo in ceno na podlagi vsebinskih meril, bi se morali izogibati uporabi oblikovanja sklopov kot edinega načina za oddajo javnega naročila.
Wherever the quality of the staff employed is relevant to the level of performance of the contract, contracting authorities should also be allowed to use as an award criterion the organisation, qualification and experience of the staff assigned to performing the contract in question, as this can affect the quality of contract performance and, as a result, the economic value of the tender.
Kadar koli kakovost zaposlenega osebja vpliva na raven izvedbe javnega naročila, bi bilo treba javnim naročnikom omogočiti tudi, da kot merilo za oddajo uporabijo organiziranost, usposobljenost in izkušnje osebja, zadolženega za izvedbo zadevnega javnega naročila, saj to lahko vpliva na kakovost izvedbe javnega naročila in posledično na ekonomsko vrednost ponudbe.
This might be the case, for example, in contracts for intellectual services such as consultancy or architectural services.
To bi na primer lahko veljalo za javna naročila intelektualnih storitev, denimo svetovanje ali arhitekturne storitve.
Contracting authorities which make use of this possibility should ensure, by appropriate contractual means, that the staff assigned to contract performance effectively fulfil the specified quality standards and that such staff can only be replaced with the consent of the contracting authority which verifies that the replacement staff affords an equivalent level of quality.
Javni naročniki, ki uporabljajo to možnost, bi morali z ustreznimi pogodbenimi sredstvi zagotoviti, da osebje, zadolženo za izvajanje javnega naročila, dejansko izpolnjuje določene standarde kakovosti ter da se lahko to osebje nadomesti le s soglasjem javnega naročnika, ki preveri, da je nadomestno osebje enako kakovostno.
It is of utmost importance to fully exploit the potential of public procurement to achieve the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
Izjemno pomembno je, da se v celoti izkoristijo možnosti javnega naročanja za uresničevanje ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 za pametno, trajnostno in vkljčujočo rast.
In this context, it should be recalled that public procurement is crucial to driving innovation, which is of great importance for future growth in Europe.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je javno naročanje bistveno za spodbujanje inovacij, ki so zelo pomembne za prihodnjo rast v Evropi.
In view of the important differences between individual sectors and markets, it would however not be appropriate to set general mandatory requirements for environmental, social and innovation procurement.
Zaradi pomembnih razlik med posameznimi sektorji in trgi pa ne bi bilo primerno določiti splošnih obveznih zahtev za javno naročanje na področju okolja, sociale in inovacij.
The Union legislature has already set mandatory procurement requirements for obtaining specific goals in the sectors of road transport vehicles (Directive 2009/33/EC of the European Parliament and the Council [16]) and office equipment (Regulation (EC) No 106/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council [17]).
Zakonodajalec Unije je že določil obvezne zahteve v zvezi z javnim naročanjem za doseganje posebnih ciljev v sektorjih vozil za cestni prevoz (Direktiva 2009/33/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [16]) in pisarniške opreme (Uredba (ES) št. 106/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [17]).
In addition, the definition of common methodologies for life cycle costing has significantly advanced.It therefore appears appropriate to continue on that path, leaving it to sector-specific legislation to set mandatory objectives and targets in function of the particular policies and conditions prevailing in the relevant sector and to promote the development and use of European approaches to life-cycle costing as a further underpinning for the use of public procurement in support of sustainable growth.
Poleg tega je opredelitev skupnih metodologij za izračun stroškov v življenjski dobi znatno napredovala.Zato se zdi primerno nadaljevati na tej poti in zakonodaji posameznih sektorjev prepustiti, da ob upoštevanju specifičnih politik in razmer, ki prevladujejo v zadevnem sektorju, določi zavezujoče cilje, ter spodbujati razvoj in uporabo evropskih pristopov k izračunu stroškov v življenjski dobi, da bi dodatno okrepili uporabo javnega naročanja pri spodbujanju trajnostne rasti.
Those sector-specific measures should be complemented by an adaptation of Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC empowering contracting authorities to pursue the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in their purchasing strategies.
Te ukrepe, sprejete za posamezne sektorje, bi bilo treba dopolniti s prilagoditvijo direktiv 2004/17/ES in 2004/18/ES, ki javne naročnike pooblaščajo za uresničevanje ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast v njihovih strategijah javnega naročanja.
It should hence be made clear that, except where it is assessed on the basis of price only, contracting authorities can determine the most economically advantageous tender and the lowest cost using a life-cycle costing approach.
Zato bi bilo treba pojasniti, da lahko javni naročniki na podlagi pristopa izračuna stroškov v življenjski dobi določijo ekonomsko najugodnejšo ponudbo in najnižjo ceno, razen kadar se ocena opravi zgolj na podlagi cene.
The notion of life-cycle costing includes all costs over the life cycle of works, supplies or services.
Pojem izračuna stroškov v življenjski dobi vključuje vse stroške v življenjski dobi gradenj, blaga ali storitev.
This means internal costs, such as research to be carried out, development, production, transport, use, maintenance and end-of-life disposal costs but can also include costs imputed to environmental externalities, such as pollution caused by extraction of the raw materials used in the product or caused by the product itself or its manufacturing, provided they can be monetised and monitored.
To pomeni notranje stroške, kot so stroški raziskav, ki jih je treba opraviti, razvoja, proizvodnje, prevoza, uporabe, vzdrževanja in odstranitve na koncu življenjske dobe, a lahko zajema tudi stroške iz naslova zunanjih okoljskih vplivov, na primer onesnaževanje, ki ga povzroča pridobivanje surovin, uporabljenih v proizvodu, ali onesnaževanje, ki ga povzroča sam proizvod oziroma njegova proizvodnja, če se lahko finančno ovrednotijo in spremljajo.
The methods which contracting authorities use for assessing costs imputed to environmental externalities should be established in advance in an objective and non-discriminatory manner and be accessible to all interested parties.
Metode, ki jih javni naročniki uporabljajo za ocenjevanje stroškov iz naslova zunanjih okoljskih vplivov, bi bilo treba vnaprej določiti na objektiven in nediskriminatoren način, dostopne pa bi morale biti vsem zainteresiranim osebam.
Such methods can be established at national, regional or local level, but they should, to avoid distortions of competition through tailor-made methodologies, remain general in the sense that they should not be set up specifically for a particular public procurement procedure.
Take metode se lahko vzpostavijo na nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni ravni, vendar pa bi morale zaradi preprečevanja izkrivljanja konkurence s prilagojenimi metodologijami ostati splošne, kar pomeni, da ne bi smele biti vzpostavljene samo zaradi določenega postopka javnega naročanja.
Common methodologies should be developed at Union level for the calculation of life-cycle costs for specific categories of supplies or services.
Na ravni Unije bi bilo treba razviti skupne metodologije za izračun stroškov v življenjski dobi za nekatere kategorije blaga ali storitev.
Where such common methodologies are developed, their use should be made compulsory.
Če se razvijejo take skupne metodologije, bi morala biti njihova uporaba obvezna.
Furthermore, the feasibility of establishing a common methodology on social life cycle costing should be examined, taking into account existing methodologies such as the Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products adopted within the framework of the United Nations Environment Programme.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba preučiti izvedljivost oblikovanja skupne metodologije za izračun družbenih stroškov v življenjski dobi, ob upoštevanju obstoječih metodologij, kot so smernice za oceno proizvodov v življenjski dobi z družbenega vidika (Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products), sprejete v okviru Programa Združenih narodov za okolje.
Furthermore, with a view to the better integration of social and environmental considerations in the procurement procedures, contracting authorities should be allowed to use award criteria or contract performance conditions relating to the works, supplies or services to be provided under the public contract in any respect and at any stage of their life cycles from extraction of raw materials for the product to the stage of disposal of the product, including factors involved in the specific process of production, provision or trading and its conditions of those works, supplies or services or a specific process during a later stage of their life cycle, even where such factors do not form part of their material substance.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba javnim naročnikom zaradi boljšega upoštevanja socialnih in okoljskih vidikov pri postopkih javnega naročanja omogočiti, da uporabljajo merila za oddajo javnega naročila ali pogoje za izvedbo javnega naročila v zvezi z gradnjami, blagom ali storitvami, ki jih je treba zagotoviti v okviru javnega naročila, in sicer v vseh pogledih in fazah njihovega življenjskega cikla, od pridobivanja surovin za proizvod do faze njegove odstranitve, vključno z dejavniki, povezanimi z določenim postopkom proizvodnje, dobave ali trgovanja in pogojev trgovanja teh gradenj, blaga ali storitev ali določenim postopkom v poznejši fazi njihovega življenjskega cikla, tudi če ti dejavniki fizično niso del njih.
Criteria and conditions referring to such a production or provision process are for example that the manufacturing of the purchased products did not involve toxic chemicals, or that the purchased services are provided using energy-efficient machines.
Merila in pogoji v zvezi s takim postopkom proizvodnje ali dobave so na primer, da izdelava naročenega blaga ni vključevala strupenih kemikalij ali da se naročene storitve zagotavljajo z energetsko učinkovitimi napravami.
In accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, this also includes award criteria or contract performance conditions relating to the supply or utilisation of fair trade products in the course of the performance of the contract to be awarded.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije to zajema tudi merila za oddajo ali pogoje za izvedbo javnega naročila, ki zadevajo dobavo ali uporabo proizvodov pravične trgovine med izvajanjem javnega naročila, ki ga je treba oddati.
Criteria and conditions relating to trading and its conditions can for instance refer to the fact that the product concerned is of fair trade origin, including the requirement to pay a minimum price and price premium to producers.
Merila in pogoji, ki zadevajo trgovanje in njegove pogoje, se lahko na primer nanašajo na to, da zadevni proizvod izvira iz pravične trgovine, vključno z zahtevo, da se proizvajalcem plačata minimalna cena in cenovna premija.
Contract performance conditions pertaining to environmental considerations might include, for example, the delivery, package and disposal of products, and in respect of works and services contracts, waste minimisation or resource efficiency.
Pogoji za izvedbo javnega naročila v zvezi z okoljskimi vidiki bi na primer lahko vključevali dostavo, pakiranje in odlaganje proizvodov, pri javnih naročilih gradenj in storitev pa zmanjševanje količine odpadkov ali učinkovitost virov.
However, the condition of a link with the subject-matter of the contract excludes criteria and conditions relating to general corporate policy, which cannot be considered as a factor characterising the specific process of production or provision of the purchased works, supplies or services.
Vendar pa pogoj povezave s predmetom javnega naročila izključuje merila in pogoje v zvezi s splošno politiko podjetja, ki se ne more šteti kot dejavnik, značilen za določen postopek proizvodnje ali zagotavljanja naročenih gradenj, blaga ali storitev.
Contracting authorities should hence not be allowed to require tenderers to have a certain corporate social or environmental responsibility policy in place.
Javni naročniki zato od ponudnikov ne bi smeli zahtevati, da imajo oblikovano določeno politiko družbene ali okoljske odgovornosti podjetja.
It is essential that award criteria or contract performance conditions concerning social aspects of the production process relate to the works, supplies or services to be provided under the contract.
Ključno je, da merila za oddajo ali pogoji za izvedbo javnega naročila glede socialnih vidikov proizvodnega postopka zadevajo gradnje, blago ali storitve, ki se morajo zagotoviti v skladu z javnim naročilom.
In addition, they should be applied in accordance with Directive 96/71/EC, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union and should not be chosen or applied in a way that discriminates directly or indirectly against economic operators from other Member States or from third countries parties to the GPA or to Free Trade Agreements to which the Union is party.
Poleg tega bi jih bilo treba uporabljati v skladu z Direktivo 96/71/ES, kakor jo razlaga Sodišče Evropske unije, ter se ne bi smeli izbrati ali uporabljati na način, ki je neposredno ali posredno diskriminatoren do gospodarskih subjektov iz drugih držav članic ali tretjih držav, ki so pogodbenice Sporazuma GPA ali sporazumov o prosti trgovini, katerih pogodbenica je Unija.
Thus, requirements concerning the basic working conditions regulated in Directive 96/71/EC, such as minimum rates of pay, should remain at the level set by national legislation or by collective agreements applied in accordance with Union law in the context of that Directive.
Zato bi morale zahteve v zvezi z osnovnimi delovnimi pogoji, ki jih ureja Direktiva 96/71/ES, na primer minimalnimi plačami, ostati na ravni, ki jo določajo nacionalna zakonodaja ali kolektivne pogodbe, ki se uporabljajo v skladu s pravom Unije v okviru navedene direktive.
Contract performance conditions might also be intended to favour the implementation of measures for the promotion of equality of women and men at work, the increased participation of women in the labour market and the reconciliation of work and private life, the protection of the environment or animal welfare and, to comply in substance with fundamental International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conventions, and to recruit more disadvantaged persons than are required under national legislation.
Pogoji za izvedbo javnega naročila bi bili lahko namenjeni tudi boljšemu izvajanju ukrepov za spodbujanje enakosti žensk in moških pri delu, večje udeležbe žensk na trgu dela ter usklajevanju poklicnega in družinskega življenja, varstvu okolja ali dobremu počutju živali, vsebinski skladnosti s temeljnimi konvencijami Mednarodne organizacije dela (MOD) ter zaposlovanju večjega števila prikrajšanih oseb, kot je potrebno v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
Measures aiming at the protection of health of the staff involved in the production process, the favouring of social integration of disadvantaged persons or members of vulnerable groups amongst the persons assigned to performing the contract or training in the skills needed for the contract in question can also be the subject of award criteria or contract performance conditions provided that they relate to the works, supplies or services to be provided under the contract.
Ukrepi, namenjeni varovanju zdravja osebja, vključenega v proizvodni postopek, spodbujanju družbenega vključevanja prikrajšanih oseb ali pripadnikov ranljivih skupin med osebe, zadolžene za izvedbo javnega naročila, ter usposabljanju na področju spretnosti, zahtevanih za zadevno javno naročilo, so tudi lahko predmet meril za oddajo ali pogojev za izvedbo javnega naročila, če zadevajo gradnje, blago ali storitve, ki jih je treba zagotoviti v skladu z javnim naročilom.