natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular, ASIC revised its regulatory guidance on licensing and oversight of CS facilities' licences in December 2012 under the updated Regulatory Guide 211 ‘Clearing and settlement facilities: Australian and overseas operators’ (‘RG 211’).
ASIC je zlasti revidirala svoja regulativna navodila glede izdajanja licenc in nadzora licenc za sisteme kliringa in poravnave decembra 2012 v okviru posodobljenih regulativnih navodil št. 211 „Sistemi kliringa in poravnave: avstralski in čezmorski subjekti“ (RG 211).
ASIC's RG 211 implements the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (‘PFMIs’) issued in April 2012 by the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems [2] ( ‘CPSS’) and the International Organization of Securities Commission (‘IOSCO’), which are relevant for the obligations set out in the Corporations Act, and provides guidance to CCPs on how to comply with their obligations under the Corporations Act.
Navodila ASIC RG 211 uveljavljajo načela za infrastrukture finančnih trgov, ki sta jih aprila 2012 izdala Odbor za plačilne in poravnalne sisteme [2] (CPSS) in Mednarodna organizacija nadzornikov trgov vrednostnih papirjev (IOSCO), ki so relevantna za obveznosti iz zakona o gospodarskih družbah, CNS pa dajejo navodila, kako izpolnjevati obveznosti iz navedenega zakona.
Therefore, failure to comply with the Corporations Act as explained in RG 211 could entail enforcement action and sanctioning measures.
Zato se lahko ob neizpolnjevanju zahtev iz zakona o gospodarskih družbah, kakor so pojasnjene v RG 211, izvedejo izvršilni ukrepi in ukrepi za izrekanje sankcij.
RBA has the power, under the Corporations Act, to determine financial stability standards for the purpose of ensuring that CCPs operate in a way that causes or promotes the overall stability of the Australian financial system.
Centralna banka Avstralije ima v skladu z zakonom o gospodarskih družbah pristojnost, da določi standarde finančne stabilnosti za zagotovitev, da CNS delujejo v smeri zagotavljanja ali spodbujanja splošne stabilnosti avstralskega finančnega sistema.
In particular, in November 2012, RBA's Payments System Board approved the determination of new financial stability standards, the Financial Stability Standards for Central Counterparties (‘FSS’), which comprise 21 standards for CCPs, with accompanying sub-standards and guidance.
Zlasti je novembra 2012 odbor za plačilne sisteme centralne banke odobril opredelitev novih standardov finančne stabilnosti (Financial Stability Standards for Central Counterparties), ki zajemajo 21 standardov za CNS ter spremne podstandarde in navodila.
The FSS are to be complied with by all licensed CCPs.
Navedena osnovna pravila predstavljajo prvo stopnjo pravno zavezujočih obveznosti v Avstraliji.
The core principles for CS facilities set out in Part 7.3 of the Corporations Act and the Corporations Regulations, as explained under ASIC's RG 211, and the FSS determined by RBA (together ‘the primary rules’), set out the high-level standards with which CCPs must comply in order to obtain authorisation to provide clearing services in Australia.
Da bi se CNS uskladile s primarnimi pravili, poleg tega sprejmejo svoja interna pravila in postopke, ki morajo upoštevati posebne zahteve iz zakona o gospodarskih družbah in predpisov o gospodarskih družbah, kot so pojasnjena v okviru RG 211 in standardih finančne stabilnosti, ta interna pravila in postopki pa se ministru predložijo pred izdajo dovoljenja za sisteme kliringa in poravnave.
Those primary rules comprise the first tier of the legally binding requirements in Australia.
Spremembe notranjih pravil in postopkov CNS je treba priglasiti ministru.
In order to comply with the primary rules, CCPs adopt, in addition, their internal rules and procedures which must conform with the specific requirements set out in the Corporations Act and the Corporations Regulations, as explained under RG 211, and the FSS, which are submitted to the Minister prior to authorisation as a CS facility.
Minister lahko spremembe notranjih pravil in postopkov CNS zavrne.
Changes to the internal rules and procedures of CCPs must be notified to the Minister.
Notranja pravila in postopki CNS učinkujejo kot pogodba in so za CNS in njihove zadevne udeležence pravno zavezujoči.
The Minister can disallow changes in the internal rules and procedures of CCPs.
Pravno zavezujoče zahteve, določene v osnovnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za CNS, ki jim je bilo izdano dovoljenje v Avstraliji, zagotavljajo dobre učinke, ki so enaki učinkom zahtev iz naslova IV Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012.
The internal rules and procedures of CCPs have the effect of a contract and are legally binding on CCPs and their respective participants.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da pravne in nadzorne ureditve Avstralije zagotavljajo, da CNS, ki jim je bilo v okviru teh ureditev izdano dovoljenje, izpolnjujejo pravno zavezujoče zahteve, ki so enake zahtevam iz naslova IV Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012.
The legally binding requirements set out in the primary rules applicable to CCPs authorised in Australia deliver substantial results equivalent to those of the requirements laid down in Title IV of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
V skladu z drugim pogojem iz člena 25(6) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 je treba s pravnimi in nadzornimi ureditvami Avstralije glede CNS, ki jim je bilo v tej državi izdano dovoljenje, zagotavljati stalen učinkovit nadzor navedenih CNS in izvrševanje predpisov.
The Commission therefore concludes that the legal and supervisory arrangements of Australia ensure that CCPs authorised therein comply with legally binding requirements which are equivalent to the requirements laid down in Title IV of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
CNS, ki jim je bilo v Avstraliji izdano dovoljenje, so pod stalnim nadzorom ASIC in centralne banke Avstralije.
According to the second condition under Article 25(6) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, the legal and supervisory arrangements of Australia in respect of CCPs authorised therein must provide for effective supervision and enforcement of those CCPs on an ongoing basis.
ASIC je pristojen za zagotavljanje, da CNS izpolnjujejo svoje obveznosti iz zakona o gospodarskih družbah in v tem smislu opravlja periodične ocene skladnosti CNS z njihovimi obveznostmi v zvezi z izdanim dovoljenjem (poleg njihovih obveznosti, ki se nanašajo na standarde finančne stabilnosti in zmanjšanje sistemskega tveganja), zlasti v zvezi z njihovo dolžnostjo poštenega in učinkovitega delovanja, kolikor je to razumno, in odda ministru poročilo, ki se nato objavi.
CCPs authorised in Australia are subject to on-going supervision and oversight by ASIC and RBA.
Centralna banka Avstralije spremlja, kako CNS izvajajo svoje obveznosti v okviru svojih dovoljenj ter v zvezi s finančno stabilnostjo in zmanjšanjem sistemskega tveganja, opravlja periodične ocene skladnosti vsake CNS s standardi finančne stabilnosti ter predloži ministru poročilo, ki se prav tako objavi.
ASIC is responsible for enforcing CCPs' compliance with their obligations under the Corporations Act and in this respect, it conducts periodic assessments of compliance by CCPs with their licence obligations, other than their obligations relating to FSS and systemic risk reduction, and in particular with their duty to operate in a fair and effective manner to the extent it is reasonable to do so, and submits a report to the Minister, which is published.
CNS, ki so jim bila izdana dovoljenja v Avstraliji, lahko prejmejo pisna navodila ministra in ASIC.
RBA monitors compliance by CCPs with their obligations under their respective licences and relating to financial stability and reduction of systemic risk, conducts periodic assessments of compliance by each CCP with the FSS and submits a report to the Minister, which is also published.
Če CNS ne izpolni pisnega navodila, lahko ASIC sproži postopek pred sodišči, ki lahko CNS odredijo, naj se uskladijo s pisnim navodilom.
CCPs authorised in Australia may receive written directions from the Minister and from ASIC.
Komisija zato meni, da pravne in nadzorne ureditve Avstralije v zvezi s CNS, ki so jim bila tam izdana dovoljenja, omogočajo učinkovit stalen nadzor in izvrševanje predpisov.
If a CCP fails to comply with a written direction, ASIC may apply to the courts which may order the CCP to comply with the written direction.
V skladu s tretjim pogojem iz člena 25(6) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 morajo pravne in nadzorne ureditve Avstralije vključevati učinkovit enakovreden sistem za priznanje CNS z dovoljenjem v skladu s pravno ureditvijo tretje države (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CNS z dovoljenjem tretje države).
The Commission therefore concludes that the legal and supervisory arrangements of Australia in respect of CCPs authorised therein provide for effective supervision and enforcement on an ongoing basis.
CNS z dovoljenjem tretje države lahko zaprosijo za čezmorska dovoljenja za sisteme kliringa in poravnave (v nadaljnjem besedilu: čezmorsko dovoljenje CNS), kar jim omogoča, da v Avstraliji opravljajo nekaj ali vse klirinške storitve, ki jih lahko opravljajo v svoji domači državi.
According to the third condition under Article 25(6) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, the legal and supervisory arrangements of Australia must include an effective equivalent system for the recognition of CCPs authorised under third country legal regimes (‘third country CCPs’).
Merila, ki se uporabljajo za CNS z dovoljenjem tretje države, ki zaprosijo za čezmorsko dovoljenje CNS v Avstraliji, so primerljiva tistim, ki so določena za CNS z dovoljenjem tretje države, ki zaprosijo za priznanje v skladu s členom 25 Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012.
Third country CCPs may apply for an ‘overseas clearing and settlement facility licence’ (‘an overseas CCP licence’) enabling them to provide in Australia some or all of the clearing services they are authorised to provide in their home country.
Predpogoj za priznanje je, da je regulativna ureditev tretje države, v kateri je CNS izdano dovoljenje, glede na stopnjo zaščite pred sistemskim tveganjem ter stopnjo učinkovitosti in poštenosti storitev, ki jih dosega, „zadosti enaka“ avstralski regulativni ureditvi za primerljive domače CNS.
The criteria applied to third country CCPs applying for an overseas CCP licence in Australia are comparable to those provided for third country CCPs applying for recognition under Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Ocena „zadostne enakosti“ vključuje podobne premisleke, kot so tisti, ki so ocenjeni v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 648/2012.
As a prerequisite for recognition, the regulatory regime of the third country in which the CCP is authorised must be deemed ‘sufficiently equivalent’, in relation to the degree of protection from systemic risk and level of effectiveness and fairness of services it achieves, to the Australian regulatory regime for comparable domestic CCPs.
Vzpostavitev ureditev sodelovanja med avstralskimi organi in zadevnimi tujimi nadzornimi organi je prav tako potrebna za izdajo čezmejnega dovoljenja CNS.
The assessment of ‘sufficient equivalence’ involves similar considerations as those assessed under Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Zato bi bilo treba šteti, da pravne in nadzorne ureditve Avstralije omogočajo učinkovit enakovreden sistem za priznavanje CNS z dovoljenjem tretje države.
The establishment of cooperation arrangements between the Australian authorities and the relevant foreign supervisory authorities is also required to grant an overseas CCP licence.
Za pogoje iz člena 25(6) Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 se lahko šteje, da so izpolnjeni na podlagi pravnih in nadzornih ureditev Avstralije glede CNS, ki jim je bilo tam izdano dovoljenje, hkrati pa bi bilo treba te pravne in nadzorne ureditve šteti za enakovredne zahtevam iz Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012.
It should therefore be considered that the legal and supervisory arrangements of Australia provide for an effective equivalent system for the recognition of third country CCPs.
Komisija bi morala na podlagi informacij ESMA še naprej spremljati razvoj avstralskega pravnega in nadzornega okvira za CNS ter izpolnjevanje pogojev, na podlagi katerih je bil ta sklep sprejet.
The conditions laid down in Article 25(6) of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 can therefore be considered to be met by the legal and supervisory arrangements of Australia regarding CCPs authorised therein and those legal and supervisory arrangements should be considered to be equivalent to the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Evropskega odbora za vrednostne papirje –
The Commission, informed by ESMA, should continue monitoring the evolution of the Australian legal and supervisory framework for CCPs and the fulfilment of the conditions on the basis of which this decision has been taken.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Za namene člena 25 Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 se pravne in nadzorne ureditve Avstralije, ki veljajo za centralne nasprotne stranke, ki se jim v Avstraliji izda dovoljenje, in so sestavljene iz dela 7.3 avstralskega zakona o gospodarskih družbah iz leta 2001 ter predpisov o gospodarskih družbah iz leta 2001, kot so pojasnjeni v regulativnih navodilih št. 211 „Sistemi kliringa in poravnave: avstralski in čezmorski subjekti“, ter standardov finančne stabilnosti za centralne nasprotne stranke, štejejo za enakovredne zahtevam iz Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012.
For the purposes of Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, the legal and supervisory arrangements of Australia applicable to CCPs authorised therein, consisting of Part 7.3 of the Corporations Act 2001 and the Corporations Regulations 2001, as explained under Regulatory Guidance 211 ‘Clearing and settlement facilities: Australian and overseas operators’, and the Financial Stability Standards for Central Counterparties, shall be considered to be equivalent to the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 648/2012.
Ta sklep začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p. 1.
V nasprotju z nekaterimi drugimi podstandardi, ki so začeli učinkovati 31. marca 2014, so standardi finančne stabilnosti za CNS začeli učinkovati marca 2013.
As of 1 September 2014 the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems has changed its name to Committee on Payment and Market Infrastructures (‘CPMI’).
Standarde finančne stabilnosti za CNS morajo izpolnjevati vse CNS, ki so jim bila izdana dovoljenja.
of 29 October 2014
z dne 29. oktobra 2014
concerning restrictions of the authorisations of biocidal products containing IPBC and propiconazole notified by Germany in accordance with Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o omejitvah dovoljenja za biocidne proizvode, ki vsebujejo IPBC in propikonazol ter ki jih je Nemčija priglasila v skladu z Direktivo 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2014) 7909)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 7909)
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products [1], and in particular Article 36(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2012 o dostopnosti na trgu in uporabi biocidnih proizvodov [1] ter zlasti člena 36(3) Uredbe,
Annex I to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] contained the list of active substances approved at Union level for inclusion in biocidal products.
Priloga I k Direktivi 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] vsebuje seznam aktivnih snovi, ki so odobrene na ravni Unije za uporabo v biocidnih pripravkih.
Commission Directives 2008/78/EC [3] and 2008/79/EC [4] added the active substances propiconazole and IPBC, respectively, for use in products belonging to product-type 8, wood preservatives, as defined in Annex V to Directive 98/8/EC.
Z direktivama Komisije 2008/78/ES [3] in 2008/79/ES [4] sta bili dodani aktivni snovi propikonazol oziroma IPBC za uporabo v pripravkih, ki spadajo v 8. vrsto izdelkov, pripravki za zaščito lesa, kakor so opredeljeni v Prilogi V k Direktivi 98/8/ES.
By virtue of Article 86 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, those substances are therefore approved active substances included in the list referred to in Article 9(2) of that Regulation.
V skladu s členom 86 Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 sta ti dve snovi torej odobreni aktivni snovi, vključeni na seznam iz člena 9(2) navedene uredbe.
In accordance with Article 8 of Directive 98/8/EC, the company Janssen PMP submitted applications to the United Kingdom for authorisation of three wood preservative biocidal products containing IPBC and propiconazole (‘the contested products’).
V skladu s členom 8 Direktive 98/8/ES je podjetje Jansen PMP pri pristojnih organih Združenega kraljestva vložilo vlogo za izdajo dovoljenja za tri biocidne proizvode za zaščito lesa, ki vsebujejo IPBC in propikonazol (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporni proizvodi).
The product authorisations granted by the United Kingdom covered different application methods, including automated dipping for industrial use and spraying (indoors and outdoors) for professional and non-professional use.
Dovoljenja za proizvode, ki jih je izdalo Združeno kraljestvo, so zajemala različne metode nanašanja, vključno z avtomatizirano potopitvijo za industrijsko uporabo in pršenjem (v zaprtih prostorih ali na prostem) za poklicno in nepoklicno uporabo.
Janssen PMP (‘the applicant’) submitted complete applications to Germany for mutual recognition of the authorisations of the contested products granted by the United Kingdom.
Podjetje Janssen PMP (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vložnik) je pri pristojnih organih Nemčije vložilo popolne vloge za medsebojno priznanje dovoljenj za sporne proizvode, ki jih je izdalo Združeno kraljestvo.
Germany notified the Commission, the other Member States and the applicant on 28 August 2013 of its proposal to restrict the authorisations in accordance with Article 4(4) of Directive 98/8/EC.
Nemčija je 28. avgusta 2013 obvestila Komisijo, druge države članice in vlagatelja o svojem predlogu za omejitev izdanih dovoljenj v skladu s členom 4(4) Direktive 98/8/ES.
Germany considers that the contested products do not meet the requirements of Article 5(1) of Directive 98/8/EC with regard to human health and the environment.
Nemčija meni, da sporni proizvodi ne izpolnjujejo zahtev iz člena 5(1) Direktive 98/8/ES v zvezi z zdravjem ljudi in okoljem.
According to Germany, the authorisation of the application method by spraying outdoors was not appropriately assessed by the United Kingdom in terms of environmental risks.
Po navedbah Nemčije dovoljenje za način nanašanja s pršenjem na prostem s strani Združenega kraljestva ni bilo ustrezno ocenjeno z vidika tveganj za okolje.
The assessment performed by Germany for the three products concluded in unacceptable risks for the distant soil compartment.
Ocena, ki jo je Nemčija izvedla za navedene tri proizvode, je privedla do zaključka, da obstajajo nesprejemljiva tveganja za kontaminacijo tal na daljavo.
Germany also considers that for one of the products, the application by automated dipping should be limited to systems with a sufficiently high degree of automation due to unacceptable risks for the health of professional users.
Nemčija meni tudi, da bi bilo zaradi nesprejemljivih tveganj za zdravje poklicnih uporabnikov treba pri enem od proizvodov nanašanje z avtomatizirano potopitvijo omejiti na sisteme, ki imajo dovolj visoko stopnjo avtomatizacije.
The Commission invited the other Member States and the applicant to submit comments to the notifications in writing within 90 days in accordance with Article 27(1) of Directive 98/8/EC.
Komisija je druge države članice in vložnika pozvala, naj predložijo pisne pripombe na obvestila v 90 dneh v skladu s členom 27(1) Direktive 98/8/ES.
Comments were submitted within that deadline by Germany, the United Kingdom and the applicant.
Nemčija, Združeno kraljestvo in vložnik so pripombe predložili v navedenem roku.
The notification was also discussed between the Commission and Member States' Competent Authorities for biocidal products on 24 September 2013 in the meeting of the coordination group established under Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Priglasitev so Komisija in pristojni organi držav članic za biocidne pripravke 24. septembra 2013 obravnavali tudi na srečanju koordinacijske skupine v skladu s členom 35 Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012.
With regard to the risks for the environment, from those discussions and comments it follows that the conclusions of the environmental assessment carried out by the United Kingdom were based on the relevant scenario of the Series on Emission Scenario Documents of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) [5] available at the time of the evaluation.
Kar zadeva tveganja za okolje, iz omenjenih razprav in pripomb sledi, da ugotovitve okoljske presoje, ki jo je izvedlo Združeno kraljestvo, temeljijo na relevantnih scenarijih iz sklopa dokumentov OECD o scenarijih emisij [5], ki so bili na razpolago v času opravljanja ocene.
It also follows that the conclusions from Germany are based on a revised scenario of the OECD Series on Emission Scenario Documents [6], available since the authorisations were granted by the United Kingdom and also since the notification made by Germany.
Iz tega prav tako sledi, da ugotovitve iz Nemčije temeljijo na revidiranem scenariju sklopa dokumentov OECD o scenarijih emisij [6], ki so na voljo, odkar so bila dovoljenja odobrena v Združenem kraljestvu in tudi od priglasitve Nemčije.
In addition, according to agreed guidance by the 47th meeting of representatives of Members States Competent Authorities for the implementation of Directive 98/8/EC concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market [7], new guidance can only be taken into consideration if it was available before the date of submission of the application for product authorisation, unless scientific progress shows that the reliance on old guidance gives rise to serious concern.
Poleg tega se v skladu z smernicami, dogovorjenimi na 47. srečanju predstavnikov pristojnih organov držav članic za izvajanje Direktive 98/8/ES o dajanju biocidnih pripravkov v promet [7], nove smernice lahko upoštevajo samo, če so bile na voljo pred datumom vložitve vloge za odobritev proizvoda, razen če znanstveni napredek kaže, da upoštevanje starih smernic povzroča resno zaskrbljenost.
This guidance further establishes that a serious concern would trigger revision of existing authorisations.
Te smernice nadalje določajo, da bi bilo v primeru ugotovitve resne zaskrbljenosti treba revidirati obstoječa dovoljenja.
However, neither the United Kingdom nor the other Member States having approved the products through mutual recognition considered that the concern was such as to justify a revision of existing authorisations.
Vendar niti Združeno kraljestvo niti druge države članice, ki so proizvode odobrile prek vzajemnega priznavanja, niso menile, da je zaskrbljenost taka, da bi upravičila revizijo obstoječih dovoljenj.
In the light of the above comments, the Commission supports the conclusions of the evaluation carried out by the United Kingdom and the other Member States having approved the products through mutual recognition, considering that the contested products fulfil the requirements set by Article 5(1) of Directive 98/8/EC with regard to the environment.
Ob upoštevanju zgornjih pripomb Komisija podpira ugotovitve ocene, ki so jo izvedli Združeno kraljestvo in druge države članice, ki so medsebojno odobrile proizvode, saj meni, da sporni proizvodi izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 5(1) Direktive 98/8/ES v zvezi z okoljem.
The Commission therefore considers that the request by Germany to restrict the authorisations cannot be justified on the grounds put forward.
Zato Komisija meni, da zahtevka Nemčije za omejitev izdaje dovoljenj ni mogoče utemeljiti na podlagi predloženih razlogov.