natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Another interested party argued that the findings as set out in recitals (174) and (175) to the provisional anti-dumping Regulation that the FIT changes did not break the causal link has no factual or legal basis and is inconsistent with Article 8(5) of the basic Regulation because the Commission failed to assess the level of injury caused by the FIT reductions and because it considered that the significant drop in the Union industry's price had been a consequence only of the subsidised Chinese imports.
Druga zainteresirana stran je trdila, da ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (174) in (175) začasne protidampinške uredbe, da spremembe tarif za dovajanje toka niso prekinile vzročne zveze, nimajo niti dejanske niti pravne podlage in niso v skladu s členom 8(5) osnovne uredbe, ker Komisija ni ocenila ravni škode, ki so jo povzročila znižanja tarif za dovajanje toka, in ker je menila, da je bil znaten padec cen industrije Unije posledica izključno kitajskega subvencioniranega uvoza.
The same party argued that the decrease in the price of modules and cells was a global phenomenon and not due to the pressure of the Chinese imports.
Ista stran je trdila, da je bilo znižanje cen modulov in celic svetovni pojav, ne pa posledica pritiska kitajskega uvoza.
In respect of the claim that the Commission failed to assess the level of injury caused by the FIT cutbacks, reference is made to recitals (628) and (629) above as well as (640) and (641), where the Commission concluded that neither the decrease in demand nor the impact of FITs on Union prices were as such as to break the causal link between the injury suffered by the Union industry and the subsidized imports from the PRC, irrespective of whether and to which extent they were possibly caused by the FITs cutbacks.
V zvezi s trditvijo, da Komisija ni ocenila ravni škode, ki so jo povzročila znižanja tarif za dovajanje toka, je treba omeniti uvodne izjave (628), (629), (640) in (641), v katerih je Komisija sklenila, da niti zmanjšanje povpraševanja niti vpliv tarif za dovajanje toka na cene Unije nista bila takšna, da bi prekinila vzročno zvezo med škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, in subvencioniranim uvozom iz LRK, ne glede na to, ali in v kolikšnem obsegu sta bila morda posledici znižanj tarif za dovajanje toka.
As regards the claim that the decrease in the price of modules and cells was a global phenomenon, reference is made to recitals (619) to (621) above where import volumes and prices from other countries than the PRC into the Union are assessed.
V zvezi s trditvijo, da je bilo znižanje cen modulov in celic svetovni pojav, je treba omeniti uvodne izjave od (619) do (621), kjer so ocenjeni obseg in cene uvoza iz držav, ki niso LRK, v Unijo.
While indeed there was a global downward trend in the prices of modules and cells, the subsidized import prices from the PRC have exacerbated the downward trend to loss making levels.
Čeprav je bilo upadanje cen modulov in celic res svetovni trend, so cene subvencioniranega uvoza iz LRK še poslabšale negativen trend, zato so bile dosežene ravni cen, ki ustvarjajo izgubo.
Furthermore, the investigation showed that the decrease in Union prices did not occur mainly due to the FIT cutbacks.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da se cene Unije niso znižale predvsem zaradi znižanja tarif za dovajanje toka.
Therefore, it is concluded that the developments of FITs were not such as to break the causal link between the subsidised imports and the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Zato se sklepa, da razvoj tarif za dovajanje toka ni bil tak, da bi prekinil vzročno zvezo med subvencioniranim uvozom in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
On this ground, the argument was rejected.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
It has been claimed that the material injury suffered by the Union industry was due to an overcapacity in the Union market and in the global market in general.
Trdilo se je, da je bil vzrok za znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, presežna zmogljivost na trgu Unije in na globalnem trgu na splošno.
It was also argued that the overcapacity in the global market led to the consolidation of the Union industry that is currently taking place and that any injury suffered was a consequence of too many production facilities.
Trdilo se je tudi, da je presežna zmogljivost na globalnem trgu privedla do sedanje konsolidacije industrije Unije in da je bila povzročena škoda posledica prevelikega števila proizvodnih obratov.
Moreover, several interested parties claimed that the material injury suffered by the Union industry was linked to the self-inflicted overexpansion of capacity of the Union industry.
Poleg tega je več zainteresiranih strani trdilo, da je bila znatna škoda, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, povezana s samopovzročenim prekomernim povečanjem zmogljivosti industrije Unije.
On the contrary, some interested parties claimed that the injury suffered by the Union industry is due to the Union industry's failure to make the necessary investments in capacity additions.
Nasprotno pa so nekatere zainteresirane strani trdile, da je bila škoda, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, posledica dejstva, da industrija Unije ni izvedla potrebnih naložb v povečanje zmogljivosti.
While the Union industry indeed increased its production capacity, its total production volume did not cover the increasing consumption levels in the Union market during the period considered.
Čeprav je industrija Unije dejansko povečala svojo proizvodno zmogljivost, pa njen celotni obseg proizvodnje v obravnavanem obdobju ni pokril povišanih stopenj potrošnje na trgu Unije.
Likewise, on this basis, the argument that the Union industry did not invest in capacity expansion was not confirmed during the investigation.
Na podlagi tega med preiskavo tudi ni bila potrjena trditev, da industrija Unije ni vlagala v povečanje zmogljivosti.
It was alleged that this situation has caused the material injury of the Union industry rather than the subsidised imports.
Trdilo se je tudi, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo zaradi takega položaja in ne zaradi subvencioniranega uvoza.
Concerning the market change that would allegedly bring the product under investigation to be a commodity, this would not justify unfair price behaviour and unfair trade practices.
V zvezi s spremembo trga, zaradi katere naj bi izdelek v preiskavi domnevno postal blago, ta ne bi upravičevala nepoštenega določanja cen in nepoštenih trgovinskih praks.
On these grounds, the arguments above were rejected.
Na podlagi tega so bile trditve zavrnjene.
One interested party claimed that the overcapacity led to price rationalization.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da je presežna zmogljivost povzročila racionalizacijo cen.
On the other hand, the capacity increases by the Union industry followed the market developments and were considered reasonable.
Po drugi strani pa je povečanje zmogljivosti industrije Unije sledilo razvoju trga in se je štelo za razumno.
The claim in this regard had therefore to be rejected.
Trditev v zvezi s tem je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Likewise, this claim could not be confirmed by the findings of the investigation which showed that the Union industry increased its production capacity and efficiency during the period considered.
Podobno te trditve ni bilo mogoče potrditi z ugotovitvami preiskave, ki je pokazala, da je industrija Unije v obravnavanem obdobju povečala svoje proizvodne zmogljivosti in učinkovitost.
Moreover, an interested party claimed that the Union industry increased its production capacity in spite of already low capacity utilisation rates, thus resulting in self-inflicted injury.
Poleg tega je druga zainteresirana stran trdila, da je industrija Unije povečala svoje proizvodne zmogljivosti kljub že tako nizkim stopnjam izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti in s tem sama povzročila škodo.
However this claim was based on the comparison between the trend of investments of the sampled Union producers and the trend of the capacity utilisation of the whole Union industry, which is not an appropriate basis for comparison.
Vendar je ta trditev temeljila na primerjavi med trendom naložb vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije in trendom izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti celotne industrije Unije, kar ni ustrezna podlaga za primerjavo.
It was argued that the Union industry concluded long term fixed priced supply contracts and could therefore not benefit from the decrease in polysilicon prices during the period considered.
Trdilo se je, da je industrija Unije sklepala dolgoročne dobavne pogodbe s fiksnimi cenami in zato v obravnavanem obdobju ni mogla imeti koristi od znižanja cen polisilicija.
The investigation showed that although the Union industry had long term supply contracts for polysilicon, the terms of these contracts were mostly renegotiated based on the price developments of polysilicon and contract prices reached levels close to or sometimes even lower than prices on the spot market.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je o pogojih teh pogodb večinoma ponovno pogajalo na podlagi gibanja cen polisilicija, kljub temu da je industrija Unije sklepala dolgoročne dobavne pogodbe,, pogodbene cene pa so dosegle raven, ki je bila blizu cenam na promptnem trgu ali včasih celo pod njimi.
Some interested parties argued that the Union industry or at least part of it could not benefit from the decrease in prices of polysilicon, during the IP, because of long term contracts for raw material.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da industrija Unije ali vsaj njen del zaradi dolgoročnih pogodb o surovinah ni mogel izkoristiti znižanja cen polisilicija v OP.
These parties claimed that the renegotiations or termination of long term contracts of polysilicon and/or wafers resulted in penalties.
Ti strani so trdile, da bi morale v primeru ponovnih pogajanj glede dolgoročnih pogodb o dobavi polisilicija ali njihove prekinitve plačati kazni.
To support this argument, these parties provided press articles reporting that some Union producers were facing litigation or that they terminated their contracts.
V podporo tej trditvi so te strani predložile časopisne članke, ki poročajo, da so se morali nekateri proizvajalci Unije soočiti s pravnimi spori ali da so prekinili svoje pogodbe.
The investigation revealed that polysilicon prices increased in 2008 when they reached their peak at around 500 $/kg, but decreased again in 2009 reaching about 50-55 $/kg at the end of 2009 with only a slight upwards trend in 2010 and early 2011.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so se cene polisilicija v letu 2008 zvišale in dosegle svojo najvišjo vrednost, tj. približno 500 USD/kg, vendar so se leta 2009 spet znižale in konec leta 2009 dosegle približno 50–55 USD/kg, v letu 2010 in na začetku leta 2011 pa so se le rahlo zvišale.
Prices dropped significantly during the IP resulting in the 30 $/kg (JRC Scientific and Policy Reports, PV Status Report 2012).
Cene so se v OP znatno znižale in dosegle 30 USD/kg (JRC Scientific and Policy Reports, PV Status Report 2012).
Moreover, the above mentioned press articles referred to post-IP developments, which did not affect the situation of the Union industry concerned during the IP, and cannot therefore be taken into account.
Poleg tega se navedeni časopisni članki nanašajo na dogodke po OP, ki niso vplivali na položaj zadevne industrije Unije v OP, in jih zato ni mogoče upoštevati.
It can be confirmed that the Union industry was indeed able to renegotiate not only the prices of the long-term contracts but also any contractual penalties relating to these long-term contracts.
Lahko se potrdi, da bi se industrija Unije res lahko ponovno pogajala tako o cenah dolgoročnih pogodb kot tudi o pogodbenih kaznih v zvezi s temi dolgoročnimi pogodbami.
One interested parties argued further that it is sufficient that only some Union producers have been affected by the long term contracts and that the situation of the overall Union industry is irrelevant.
Ena od navedenih zainteresiranih strani je poleg tega trdila, da zadošča, da so dolgoročne pogodbe vplivale na samo nekatere proizvajalce Unije, in da položaj celotne industrije Unije ni pomemben.
In this regard, it was argued that it was the decrease in the polysilicon prices rather than the price pressure from the Chinese imports that caused the decrease in sales prices.
V zvezi s tem se je trdilo, da je znižanje prodajnih cen posledica znižanja cen polisilicija in ne posledica cenovnega pritiska kitajskega uvoza.
As far as the Union industry is concerned its average selling prices decreased much further than the decrease of the average cost of production, on which the decline of raw material prices could have an impact.
Za industrijo Unije je bilo znižanje povprečnih prodajnih cen precej izrazitejše kot zmanjšanje povprečnih stroškov proizvodnje, na katere bi lahko vplivalo znižanje cen surovin.
Following the final disclosure, some interested parties reiterated that the impact of the decrease of polysilicon prices on the Union industry's cost was not limited or diluted through the value chain as concluded in the investigation.
Po dokončnem razkritju je nekaj zainteresiranih strani ponovilo, da vpliv znižanja cen polisilicija na stroške industrije Unije ni bil omejen ali porazdeljen po vrednostni verigi, kot je bilo ugotovljeno v preiskavi.
However, as already mentioned in recital (255) above, polysilicon is the main raw material for wafers producers, thus any impact on the production cost of cells or modules was found to be diluted in the value chain.
Vendar pa je polisilicij, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (255), glavna surovina za proizvajanje rezin, zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil vsak vpliv na stroške proizvodnje celic ali modulov porazdeljen po vrednostni verigi.
In this regard, it cannot be excluded that some producers may have had to pay penalties for the cancellation of wafers supply contracts during the period considered.
Glede tega ni mogoče izključiti, da so nekateri proizvajalci morda morali plačati kazen zaradi odpovedi pogodb o dobavi rezin v upoštevanem obdobju.
While it can therefore not be completely excluded that penalties could have had a certain negative impact on limited number of Union producers, the overall impact on the Union industry is at best marginal and hence could not break the causal link between the subsidised imports and the material injury suffered by the whole Union industry.
Medtem ko torej ni mogoče v celoti izključiti, da bi kazni lahko imele določen negativen vpliv na omejeno število proizvajalcev Unije, je celoten vpliv na industrijo Unije v najboljšem primeru obrobnega pomena in zato ne bi mogel prekiniti vzročne zveze med subvencioniranim uvozom in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela celotna industrija Unije.
However, in this regard, it should be noted that the investigation showed that the imports from the PRC were subsidised and substantially undercutting the prices of the Union industry.
Vendar je treba v zvezi s tem poudariti, da je preiskava pokazala, da je bil uvoz iz LRK subvencioniran in da je bistveno prispeval k nelojalnemu znižanju cen industrije Unije.
Another interested party reiterated that the litigation of one Union producer after the IP may has affected the situation of at least this Union producer already during the IP.
Druga zainteresirana stran je ponovno navedla, da bi pravni spor enega proizvajalca Unije po OP lahko vplival najmanj na položaj tega proizvajalca Unije že v OP.
This party did not explain however how and to what extend such event that occurred after the IP could indeed have had an effect on this producer's situation during the IP.
Vendar ta stran ni pojasnila, kako in v kolikšnem obsegu bi lahko tak dogodek, ki se je zgodil po OP, dejansko vplival na položaj tega proizvajalcu v OP.
On the basis of the above, it is concluded that even if some specific Union producers may have been affected by long term contracts, the Union industry, overall, did not suffer from these long term contracts and was able to fully benefit from the price decrease in raw material prices.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so dolgoročne pogodbe morda prizadele nekaj določenih proizvajalcev Unije, vendar industrija Unije na splošno zaradi teh dolgoročnih pogodb ni utrpela škode in je lahko v celoti izkoristila znižanje cen surovin.
The long term contracts were therefore not found to break the causal link between the subsisdised imports and the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Torej ni bilo ugotovljeno, da bi dolgoročne pogodbe prekinile vzročno zvezo med subvencioniranim uvozom in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
It was claimed that the small-scale producers had a disadvantage compared to the larger vertically integrated producers and therefore any injury suffered by the small scale producers cannot be attributed to the subsidised imports.
Trdilo se je, da so bili mali proizvajalci v slabšem položaju v primerjavi z večjimi in vertikalno integriranimi proizvajalci ter da zato škode, ki so jo utrpeli mali proizvajalci, ni mogoče pripisati subvencioniranemu uvozu.
In this context it was also claimed that in any event, overall, the Union industry was of a small size and therefore was not able to benefit from economies of scale.
V zvezi s tem se je tudi trdilo, da je industrija Unije v vsakem primeru na splošno majhna in zato ni mogla izkoristiti ekonomij obsega.
Most Union producers have specialised in one part of the production process (cells or modules), which, through specialisation, increased their competitiveness with regard to the specific product type they were producing.
Večina proizvajalcev Unije se je specializirala za en del proizvodnega procesa (celice ali moduli), kar je povečalo njihovo konkurenčnost v zvezi s posebno vrsto izdelka, ki so ga proizvajali.
The argument that impact of the high degree automation caused the injury suffered by the Union industry, had therefore to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba zavrniti trditev, da je bil vzrok za škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, vpliv visoke stopnje avtomatizacije.
Some interested parties claimed that the price pressure resulted in the consolidation of the Union industry and the Chinese industry, the latter being the cause of the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da je cenovni pritisk povzročil konsolidacijo industrije Unije in kitajske industrije, slednja pa je bila vzrok za znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
However, the investigation showed that the consolidation was rather a consequence of the subsidised imports and the unfair trade practices.
Preiskava pa je pokazala, da je bila konsolidacija prej posledica subvencioniranega uvoza in nepoštenih trgovinskih praks.
Moreover, it was claimed that the lack of vertical integration of the Union industry is the cause of the injury suffered.
Trdilo se je tudi, da je vzrok za povzročeno škodo pomanjkanje vertikalne integracije industrije Unije.
However, the investigation showed that the advantage of vertical integration by part of the Union industry that was vertically integrated could not be fully exploited as the price pressure from subsidised imports was extremely high.
Preiskava pa je pokazala, da del industrije Unije, ki je bil vertikalno integriran, ni mogel v celoti izkoristiti prednosti vertikalne integracije, saj je bil cenovni pritisk zaradi subvencioniranega uvoza izjemno visok.
Moreover, the Union industry, even the vertically integrated Union producers, due to the subsidized imports could not fully benefit from high capacity utilisation rates to achieve economies of scale.
Poleg tega industrija Unije, vključno z vertikalno integriranimi proizvajalci Unije, zaradi subvencioniranega uvoza ni mogla v celoti izkoristiti visokih stopenj izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, da bi dosegla ekonomije obsega.
To the contrary, the investigation showed that the majority of the investments made by the Union industry were dedicated to new machinery and R&D and that there are no meaningful differences in technology between the products world-wide.
Nasprotno, preiskava je pokazala, da je bila večina naložb industrije Unije namenjena novim strojem ter raziskavam in razvoju, med izdelki s celega sveta pa ni bilo pomembnih razlik v tehnologiji.
In addition, any failed project could rather be considered as a consequence of the subsidised imports.
Poleg tega bi se lahko prej štelo, da so neuspeli projekti posledica subvencioniranega uvoza.
The argument had therefore to be rejected.
To trditev je bilo treba zato zavrniti.
Several interested parties claimed that the Union industry was not able to rationalize its costs in time to respond to the developments in the world market.
Več zainteresiranih strani je trdilo, da industrija Unije ni mogla pravočasno racionalizirati svojih stroškov, da bi se odzvala na razvoj na svetovnem trgu.
The investigation showed that the cost of production of the Union industry was steadily decreasing during the period considered.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so se stroški proizvodnje industrije Unije v obravnavanem obdobju stalno zniževali.
Productivity increased for modules and cells.
Produktivnost se je povečala za module in celice.
As mentioned above, due to the surge of subsidised imports from the PRC and the consequent significant price pressure on the Union market, the Union industry was not able to benefit from the reductions in cost.
Kot je bilo omenjeno, industrija Unije zaradi povečanja subvencioniranega uvoza iz LRK in posledičnega znatnega cenovnega pritiska na trgu Unije ni mogla imeti koristi od zmanjšanja stroškov.
It is noted that the exporting producers in the PRC do not enjoy any comparative advantage with regard to raw materials (polysilicon) and the machinery used as both were mostly imported from the Union.
Poudariti je treba, da proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK nimajo primerjalnih prednosti v zvezi s surovinami (polisilicijem) in uporabljenimi stroji, saj so večinoma uvoženi iz Unije.
As far as labour and overhead costs, including depreciation are concerned, they represented on average less than 10 % of the total cost of a module in the IP and are not considered to have played any significant role.
Stroški dela in splošni stroški, vključno z amortizacijo, so v OP v povprečju predstavljali manj kot 10 % celotnih stroškov za modul in se zanje ne šteje, da so imeli pomembno vlogo.
Moreover, it was claimed that some Union producers sourced cells and/or modules from the country concerned, and re-sold those products on the Union market as their own.
Poleg tega se je trdilo, da so nekateri proizvajalci Unije nabavljali celice in/ali module v zadevni državi in jih nato prodali na trgu Unije kot svoje izdelke.
Injury resulting from these transactions should not be attributed to the subsidized imports.
Škoda, ki izhaja iz teh transakcij, se ne bi smela pripisati subvencioniranemu uvozu.
However, the investigation revealed that imports from the Union industry of the product concerned were complementary in nature as well as limited in terms of volume when compared to the total Union production and therefore their effect, if any would only be marginal and could not be considered breaking the causal link between the subsidized imports and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da je imel uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Unije dopolnilni značaj in je bil njegov obseg omejen v primerjavi s skupno proizvodnjo Unije, zato bi bil njegov vpliv, če ga je sploh imel, zgolj zanemarljiv in se zanj ne bi štelo, da je prekinil vzročno zvezo med subvencioniranim uvozom in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Therefore, in order to match the decreasing price trend of the imports from the PRC, the Union industry had to make considerable efforts to rationalize its cost of production.
Zato si je morala industrija Unije močno prizadevati za racionalizacijo svojih stroškov proizvodnje, da bi se prilagodila trendu nižanja cen uvoza iz LRK.
Despite the efforts of the Union industry, this cost rationalization could not be reflected in the sales price due to the significant undercutting exerted by the subsidised imports.
Kljub prizadevanjem industrije Unije se ta racionalizacija stroškov ni mogla pokazati v prodajnih cenah zaradi znatnega nelojalnega nižanja cen, ki ga je povzročil subvencionirani uvoz.