natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Second table — the text ‘ERA technical document ERA/TD/2012-04/INT version 1.0 of 4.6.2012’ in the cell in the column ‘Standard/UIC leaflet’, sixth row, is replaced by the following:
v drugi preglednici se besedilo „Tehnični dokument ERA: ERA/TD/2012-04/INT, različica 1.0 z dne 4. junija 2012“ v stolpcu „Standard/navodilo UIC“ v šesti vrstici nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘ERA technical document ERA/TD/2012-04/INT version 1.2 of 18.1.2013 published on the Agency website (http://www.era.europa.eu)’.
„Tehnični dokument ERA: ERA/TD/2012/04/INT, različica 1.2 z dne 18. januarja 2013, objavljen na spletišču Agencije (http://www.era.europa.eu)“.
OJ L 264, 8.10.2011, p. 32.’;
UL L 264, 8.10.2011, str. 32.“;
Only for two stage load brake (changeover command) and P10 (cast iron blocks with 10 ‰ phosphor)- or LL-brake blocks
Le za dvostopenjski zavorni sistem, ki deluje glede na obremenitev (ukaz za menjavo), in P10 (litoželezni zavornjaki z 10 ‰ fosforja) – ali zavornjake LL.
‘a’Speed km/h3,622STeSpeed km/h3,6, with Te = 2 sec.
‚a‘Hitrost km/h3,622STeHitrost km/h3,6, pri čemer je Te = 2 sek.
Distance calculation in accordance with EN 14531-1:2005 section 5.11
Izračun razdalje v skladu z oddelkom 5.11 standarda EN 14531-1:2005.
An ‘S1’ unit is a unit with empty/load device.
Enota ‚S1‘ je enota z menjalom prazno/naloženo.
The maximum load per axle is 22,5 t.
Največja osna obremenitev je 22,5 tone.
An ‘S2’ unit is a unit with a variable load relay.
Enota ‚S2‘ je enota z relejem za različno obremenitev.
An ‘SS’ unit shall be equipped with a variable load relay.
Enota ‚SS‘ je opremljena z relejem za različno obremenitev.
The maximum mean retardation force allowed (for running speed at 100 km/h) is 18 0,9116,5 kN/axle.
Največja dopustna srednja zaviralna sila (za vozno hitrost 100 km/h) je 18 0,9116,5 kN/os.
This value comes from the maximum braking energy input permitted on a clasp braked wheel with a nominal new diameter in the range of [920 mm; 1000 mm] during braking (the brake weight shall be limited to 18 tonnes/axle).
Ta vrednost izhaja iz največje dopustne zavorne energije, ki je dovoljena na zavrto kolo z nazivnim novim premerom v razponu [920 mm; 1000 mm] med zaviranjem (zavorna masa je omejena na 18 ton/os).
Usually a unit, with V max = 100 km/h and fitted with a variable relay is designed to obtain λ = 100 % up to 14,5 t/axle.
Običajno je enota z V max = 100 km/h, ki je opremljena z relejem za različno obremenitev, konstruirana tako, da doseže λ = 100 % do 14,5 tone/os.
The maximum mean retardation force allowed (for running speed at 120 km/h) is 18 0,8816 kN/axle.
Največja dopustna srednja zaviralna sila (za vozno hitrost 120 km/h) je 18 0,8816 kN/os.
This value comes from the maximum braking energy input permitted on a clasp braked wheel with a nominal new diameter in the range of [920 mm; 1000 mm] during braking (the brake weight shall be limited to 18 tonnes).
Ta vrednost izhaja iz največje dopustne zavorne energije, ki je dovoljena na zavrto kolo z nazivnim novim premerom v razponu [920 mm; 1000 mm] med zaviranjem (zavorna masa je omejena na 18 ton/os).
The mass/axle is limited to 20 t/axle and the corresponding λ is 90 %.
Masa/os je omejena na 20 ton/os in ustrezni λ je 90 %.
If it is required that λ 걳 100 % with mass/axle 걳 18 t then it is necessary to consider another kind of brake.
Če se zahteva λ 걳 100 % pri masi/os 걳 18 ton, je treba upoštevati drugo vrsto zavor.
λ must not exceed 125 %, considering for braking only on wheels (brake blocks), the maximum mean retardation force allowed of 16 kN/axle (for running speed at 120 km/h).
λ ne sme preseči 125 %, ob upoštevanju zavor le na kolesih (zavornjaki) je največja dopustna srednja zaviralna sila 16 kN/os (za vozno hitrost 120 km/h).
Changeover in accordance with EN 15624:2008 + A1:2010
Menjava v skladu s standardom EN 15624:2008 + A1:2010.
Variable load relay in accordance with EN 15611:2008 + A1:2010 in combination with a variable load sensing device in accordance with EN 15625:2008 + A1:2010.’;
Rele za različno obremenitev v skladu s standardom EN 15611:2008 + A1:2010 v kombinaciji s senzorjem za različne obremenitve v skladu s standardom EN 15625:2008 + A1:2010.“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1237/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1237/2013
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1238/2013
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9(4) and 14(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 9(4) in člena 14(1) Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga Evropske komisje po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom,
The European Commission (‘the Commission’) by Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 [2] (‘the provisional Regulation’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’ or the ‘country concerned’).
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je z Uredbo (EU) št. 513/2013 [2] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic in rezin) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“ ali „zadevna država“) ali ki so od tam poslani.
The investigation was initiated following a complaint lodged on 25 July 2012 by EU ProSun (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of crystalline silicon photovoltaic (‘PV’) modules and key components.
Preiskava je bila uvedena na podlagi pritožbe, ki jo je 25. julija 2012 vložilo združenje EU ProSun („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje Unije fotonapetostnih modulov in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov iz kristalnega silicija.
As mentioned in recital (3) to the provisional Regulation, following a request by the complainant supported by the required evidence the Commission adopted on 1 March 2013 Regulation (EU) No 182/2013 [3] making imports of crystalline silicon PV modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China subject to registration as of 6 March 2013.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (3) začasne uredbe, je Komisija na podlagi zahtevka pritožnika, podprtega z zahtevanimi dokazili, 1. marca 2013 sprejela Uredbo (EU) št. 182/2013 [3] o registraciji uvoza fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic in rezin) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, ki se uporablja od 6. marca 2013.
The provisional Regulation ceased the registration of imports for the purpose of the anti-dumping investigation in accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation since a provisional anti-dumping duty provided protection against dumped imports.
Začasna uredba je ustavila registracijo uvoza za namene protidampinške preiskave v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe, saj je začasna protidampinška dajatev zagotovila zaščito proti dampinškemu uvozu.
Some interested parties claimed that the decision for registration of imports was unfounded, as the conditions were not met pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da je odločitev o registraciji uvoza neutemeljena, saj pogoji niso bili izpolnjeni v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe.
However, these claims were not substantiated or based on factual evidence.
Vendar pa te trditve niso bile utemeljene ali niso temeljile na dejanskih dokazih.
At the time the decision was taken to register imports the Commission had sufficient prima facie evidence justifying the need to register imports, in particular a sharp increase both in terms of absolute imports and in terms of market share.
V času sprejetja sklepa o registraciji uvoza je imela Komisija za upravičenost potrebe po registraciji uvoza zadostne dokaze prima facie, zlasti močno povečanje v smislu absolutnega uvoza, pa tudi v smislu tržnega deleža.
The claims in this regard had therefore to be rejected.
Trditve v zvezi s tem je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Acceptance of an Undertaking with regards to provisional duties
Sprejetje zaveze glede začasnih dajatev
By Commission Decision 2013/423/EU [4], the Commission has accepted an undertaking offered by exporting producers together with the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products (‘CCCME’).
S Sklepom Komisije 2013/423/EU [4] je Komisija sprejela zavezo, ki so jo ponudili proizvajalci izvozniki skupaj s kitajsko gospodarsko zbornico za izvoz in uvoz strojev in elektronskih izdelkov („CCCME“).
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose provisional anti-dumping measures (‘the provisional disclosure’), the Government of China (‘GOC’) and several interested parties made written submissions making known their views on the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta odločitev za uvedbo začasnih protidampinških ukrepov („začasno razkritje“), so kitajska vlada in več zainteresiranih strani predložili pisna stališča v zvezi z začasnimi ugotovitvami. Stranem, ki so zahtevale zaslišanje, je bila ta možnost odobrena.
In addition, verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Poleg tega so bili v prostorih naslednjih družb opravljeni preveritveni obiski:
Downstream operators
gospodarski subjekti, ki so nižje v prodajni verigi
Jayme de la Costa, Pedroso, Portugal
Jayme de la Costa, Pedroso, Portugalska,
Sunedison Spain Construction, Madrid, Spain
Sunedison Spain Construction, Madrid, Španija;
Independent consultant
neodvisni svetovalec
Europressedienst, Bonn, Germany
Europressedienst, Bonn, Nemčija.
AFASE questioned the legal basis for the visit carried out at the premises of Europressedienst, as it is not an interested party in this investigation and does therefore not fall under Article 16 of the basic Regulation.
Združenje AFASE je izrazilo dvom o pravni podlagi za obisk, opravljen v prostorih družbe Europressedienst, in trdilo, da ta družba ni zainteresirana stran v tej preiskavi in se zato člen 16 osnovne uredbe zanjo ne uporablja.
Europressedienst, as mentioned in recitals (99) and (120) to the provisional Regulation has provided information on macroeconomic indicators.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (99) in (120) začasne uredbe, je Europressedienst zagotovila informacije o makroekonomskih kazalnikih.
It is clarified that the Commission carried out an on-the-spot verification at the premises of Europressedienst for the sake of the principle of good administration to verify the reliability and correctness of data on which the Commission based its findings.
Pojasnjeno je, da je Komisija opravila preveritev na kraju samem v prostorih družbe Europressedienst zaradi načela dobrega upravljanja, da bi preverila zanesljivost in točnost podatkov, s katerimi je Komisija utemeljila svoje ugotovitve.
The GOC reiterated the claim that its rights of defence in relation to access to the files open for inspection by interested parties were violated because (i) information was missing from the non-confidential files without ‘good cause’ being shown or providing sufficiently detailed summaries, or exceptionally, the reasons for the failure to provide the non-confidential summary, (ii) the non-confidential version of an entire questionnaire response of a Union producer was missing and (iii) the delays to make non-confidential versions of the Union producers' questionnaire responses available for interested parties were excessive.
Kitajska vlada je ponovno trdila, da so bile njene pravice do obrambe glede dostopa do dokumentacije, ki je na voljo za pregled zainteresiranim stranem, kršene, ker (i) v nezaupnih dokumentih ni bilo informacij, ne da bi bili pri tem navedeni „dober razlog“ ali dovolj podrobni povzetki oziroma izjemoma razlogi, zakaj nezaupen povzetek ni naveden, (ii) je manjkala nezaupna različica odziva na celotni vprašalnik proizvajalca Unije, (iii) so bile zamude pri dostopnosti nezaupnih različic odzivov na vprašalnik proizvajalcev Unije za zainteresirane strani prevelike.
As to the delays in making available the non-confidential replies of the questionnaires of the sampled Union producers, it had been explained to the party concerned that the questionnaires were only added to the non-confidential file after having been checked as to their completeness and reasonableness of the summaries.
Glede zamud pri dostopnosti nezaupnih odzivov na vprašalnik vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije je bilo zadevni strani pojasnjeno, da so bili vprašalniki nezaupnemu spisu dodani šele po pregledu njihove popolnosti in razumnosti povzetkov.
In any event, it is considered that this did in no way affect the interested parties' rights of defence.
Vsekakor se šteje, da to nikakor ni vplivalo na pravico do obrambe zainteresiranih strani.
The Commission has given all the interested parties the opportunity to respond to the information included in the file open for inspection in time so that their comments could be taken into consideration, when substantiated and warranted before any conclusions were made in the investigation.
Komisija je vsem zainteresiranim stranem dala možnost, da se pravočasno odzovejo na informacije iz dokumentacije, ki je na voljo za pregled, da bi se njihove utemeljene in upravičene pripombe lahko upoštevale pred sprejetjem sklepov v preiskavi.
The interested party had every opportunity to comment on the questionnaires from sampled Union producers also following the provisional and the final disclosure.
Zainteresirana stran je imela možnost predložiti pripombe glede vprašalnika vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije tudi po začasnem in dokončnem razkritju.
Therefore, even if the disclosures and the access to the file open for inspection by interested parties are based on different legal provisions, it should be noted that there were ample opportunities for the interested parties to comment on all information made available by any party to the investigation.
Čeprav so razkritja in dostop do dokumentacije, ki je bila zainteresiranim stranem na voljo za pregled, temeljila na različnih pravnih določbah, so imele zainteresirane strani dovolj priložnosti za predložitev pripomb na vse informacije, ki so jih vse strani dale na razpolago za preiskavo.
All interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of provisional duty (‘the final disclosure’).
Vse zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, ter dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo („dokončno razkritje“).
Acceptance of an undertaking in view of definitive duties
Sprejetje zaveze glede dokončnih dajatev
Following final disclosure, the Commission received an amended offer for an undertaking by exporting producers together with the CCCME, which covers also the parallel anti-subsidy investigation.
Komisija je po dokončnem razkritju prejela spremenjeno ponudbo za zavezo proizvajalcev izvoznikov skupaj s CCCME, ki zajema tudi vzporedno protisubvencijsko preiskavo.
By Commission Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU [5] of 4 December 2013 confirming the acceptance of an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China for the period of application of definitive measures, the Commission has confirmed the acceptance of that undertaking.
Komisija je potrdila sprejetje navedene zaveze z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2013/707/EU [5] z dne 4. decembra 2013 o potrditvi sprejetja zaveze, ponujene v okviru protidampinškega in protisubvencijskega postopka v zvezi z uvozom fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani, za obdobje uporabe dokončnih ukrepov.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, some interested parties reiterated the argument that excessive use of confidentiality prevented them from commenting on the selection of the sample of Union producers and thus from the proper exercise of their rights of defence.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov so nekatere zainteresirane strani ponovno poudarile, da zaradi pretirane uporabe zaupnosti ne morejo podati pripomb o izbiri vzorca proizvajalcev Unije in zato ne morejo ustrezno uveljavljati svojih pravic do obrambe.
The Commission already addressed this issue in recital (9) to the provisional Regulation.
Komisija je to vprašanje že obravnavala v uvodni izjavi (9) začasne uredbe.
As no new information was provided in this respect, the conclusions in recital (9) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem niso bile predložene nobene nove informacije, se sklepne ugotovitve v uvodni izjavi (9) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The GOC reiterated its claim that the use of confidentiality of the names of the complainants and sampled Union producers is not warranted.
Kitajska vlada je ponovila svojo trditev, da uporaba zaupnosti imen pritožnikov in vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije ni upravičena.
As already stated in recital (9) to the provisional Regulation, the Union producers requested that their names be kept confidential due to the risk of retaliation.
Kot je že navedeno v uvodni izjavi (9) začasne uredbe, so proizvajalci Unije zahtevali, naj njihova imena ostanejo zaupna zaradi nevarnosti povračilnih ukrepov.
The Commission considered that these requests were sufficiently substantiated to be granted.
Komisija je menila, da so te zahteve dovolj utemeljene, da se upoštevajo.
The information that has been provided to the Commission in order to substantiate the risk of retaliation cannot be disclosed to third parties, as such disclosure would defeat the purpose of the request for confidentiality.
Informacij, predloženih Komisiji za utemeljitev nevarnosti povračilnih ukrepov, ni mogoče razkriti tretjim stranem, saj bi takšno razkritje onemogočilo namen zahteve po zaupnosti.
Moreover, in a case, where, as reported by the GOC, a Union producer re-evaluated its position and revealed its identity by filing an application for a Court case against the provisional Regulation, there is no longer ground to disclose information on the basis of which anonymity was granted, as the identity has been revealed.
Po poročanju kitajske vlade v primeru, da je proizvajalec Unije ponovno ocenil svoj položaj in razkril svojo identiteto z izpolnjeno vlogo za zadevo Sodišča proti začasni uredbi, razloga za razkritje informacij, na podlagi katerega je bila anonimnost odobrena, ni več, saj je bila identiteta razkrita.
Further to the provisional disclosure, one interested party reiterated that the information on which the selection of the sample was based was not reliable, without, however, providing any new evidence in this regard.
Po začasnem razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran ponovno poudarila, da informacije, na katerih je temeljila izbira vzorca, niso bile zanesljive, vendar ni zagotovila nobenih novih dokazov v zvezi s tem.
Following the final disclosure, the CCCME reiterated the arguments about the method used for the selection of the provisional sample of the Union producers.
Po dokončnem razkritju je CCCME ponovno ponovil svoje argumente glede metode, uporabljene za izbiro začasnega vzorca proizvajalcev Unije.
It claims in particular that the Institutions have not taken into account 120 producers.
Trdi zlasti, da institucije niso upoštevale 120 proizvajalcev.
Moreover, the Institutions have verified the activities of the companies provided on that list.
Institucije so preverile dejavnosti družb iz navedenega seznama.
It turned out that that list mostly includes installers, distributors, related importers and exporting producer in China, Taiwan, and India.
Izkazalo se je, da navedeni seznam vključuje zlasti monterje, distributerje, povezane uvoznike in proizvajalca izvoznika iz Kitajske, Tajvana in Indije.
It therefore was not apt to demonstrate that the Institutions had overlooked a significant number of Union producers.
Zato ni ustrezno dokazoval, da so institucije spregledale znatno število proizvajalcev Unije.
Moreover, the CCCME has not contested the total Union production by providing alternative figures, nor has it put forward any evidence that the representativity of the sample could have been affected, as none of the alleged additional Union producers would have been selected into the sample, had it been known to the Commission.
CCCME prav tako ni nasprotoval celotni proizvodni Unije s posredovanjem alternativnih številk, prav tako ni posredovala dokazov, da je bila reprezentativnost vzorca lahko prizadeta, saj ne bi bil nihče od domnevnih dodatnih proizvajalcev Unije izbran v vzorec, če bi bilo to predloženo Komisiji.
Following the exclusion of wafers from the definition of the product concerned, and thus from the scope of this investigation as cited in recital (32) below, the final sample consisted of eight Union producers.
Po izključitvi rezin iz opredelitve zadevnega izdelka in torej iz obsega te preiskave, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (32), je končni vzorec sestavljalo osem proizvajalcev Unije.
In the absence of any further comments with regard to the sampling of Union producers, the findings in recitals (7) to (10) to the provisional Regulation are herewith confirmed, as amended above.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb glede vzorčenja proizvajalcev Unije, se ugotovitve v uvodnih izjavah (7) do (10) začasne uredbe potrdijo, kakor so bile spremenjene zgoraj.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, as mentioned in recital (12) to the provisional Regulation, the Commission contacted additional importers that had already cooperated in the investigation at the initiation stage by providing basic information on their activities related to the product under investigation during the investigation period, as specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (12) začasne uredbe, je Komisija po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov vzpostavila stik z dodatnimi uvozniki, ki so že sodelovali v preiskavi v začetni fazi z zagotavljanjem osnovnih informacij o svojih dejavnostih v obdobju preiskave, ki se nanašajo na izdelek v preiskavi, kot je določeno v obvestilu o začetku.
The purpose was to determine whether the size of the sample of unrelated importers could be increased.
Namen je bil ugotoviti, ali je vzorec nepovezanih uvoznikov mogoče povečati.