natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Consequently, and given that the possible existence of such direct or indirect dominant influence would already have had to be verified for the purposes of deciding whether the annual accounts of the undertakings and entities concerned should be consolidated, undertakings should be considered to be affiliated where their annual accounts are consolidated, However, Union rules on consolidated accounts are not applicable in a certain number of cases, for instance because of the size of the undertakings involved or because certain conditions relating to their legal form are not met.
Ker je treba morebiten obstoj takšnega neposrednega ali posrednega prevladujočega vpliva preveriti že zaradi odločanja o tem, ali je treba letne računovodske izkaze zadevnih podjetij in naročnikov konsolidirati, bi bilo treba podjetja v primeru konsolidacije njihovih letnih računovodskih izkazov tako šteti za povezana podjetja. Vendar se pravila Unije o konsolidiranih računovodskih izkazih v nekaterih primerih ne uporabljajo, na primer zaradi velikosti vključenih podjetij ali neizpolnjevanja nekaterih pogojev v zvezi z njihovo pravno obliko.
In such cases, where Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [17] is not applicable, it will be necessary to examine whether a direct or indirect dominant influence is present taking into account ownership, financial participation or the rules governing the undertakings.
V takšnih primerih – če se Direktiva 2013/34/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [17] ne uporablja – bo treba obstoj neposrednega ali posrednega prevladujočega vpliva preveriti ob upoštevanju lastništva, finančne udeležbe ali predpisov, ki urejajo delovanje teh podjetij.
The co-financing of research and development (R & D) programmes by industry sources should be encouraged.
Spodbujati bi bilo treba sofinanciranje programov raziskav in razvoja s strani industrije.
It should consequently be clarified that this Directive applies only where there is no such co-financing and where the outcome of the R & D activities go to the contracting entity concerned.
Zato bi bilo treba pojasniti, da se ta direktiva uporablja samo, kadar takega sofinanciranja ni in kadar rezultati dejavnosti raziskav in razvoja pripadajo zadevnemu naročniku.
This should not exclude the possibility that the service provider, having carried out those activities, could publish an account thereof as long as the contracting entity retains the exclusive right to use the outcome of the R & D in the conduct of its own affairs.
To pa ne bi smelo izključevati možnosti, da izvajalec storitev, ki je te dejavnosti izvedel, o njih objavi poročilo, pod pogojem, da naročnik obdrži izključno pravico uporabe rezultatov dejavnosti raziskav in razvoja pri izvajanju svojih dejavnosti.
However fictitious sharing of the results of the R & D or purely symbolic participation in the remuneration of the service provider should not prevent the application of this Directive.
Vendar pa uporabe te direktive ne bi smela preprečiti nikakršna navidezna izmenjava rezultatov dejavnosti raziskav in razvoja niti povsem simbolična udeležba pri plačilu izvajalca storitev.
This Directive should apply neither to contracts intended to permit the performance of an activity that is subject to this Directive nor to design contests organised for the pursuit of such an activity if, in the Member State in which this activity is carried out, it is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not limited.
Ta direktiva se ne bi smela uporabljati za javna naročila, ki naj bi dovoljevala opravljanje dejavnosti, ki je predmet te direktive, niti za projektne natečaje, ki se organizirajo za opravljanje take dejavnosti, če je ta v državi članici, v kateri se opravlja, neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen.
Such a procedure should provide legal certainty for the entities concerned, as well as an appropriate decision-making process, ensuring, within short time limits, uniform application of Union law in this area.
Tak postopek bi moral zagotoviti pravno varnost za zadevne naročnike in ustrezen postopek odločanja ter v kratkem roku zagotoviti enotno uporabo prava Unije na tem področju.
For the sake of legal certainty it should be clarified that all Decisions adopted prior to the entry into force of this Directive concerning the applicability of the corresponding provisions set out in Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC continue to be applicable.
Zaradi pravne varnosti bi bilo treba pojasniti, da se vse odločbe oziroma sklepi glede uporabe ustreznih določb iz člena 30 Direktive 2004/17/ES, sprejeti pred začetkom veljavnosti te direktive, uporabljajo še naprej.
Direct exposure to competition should be assessed on the basis of objective criteria, taking account of the specific characteristics of the sector of parts thereof concerned.
Neposredno izpostavljenost konkurenci bi bilo treba oceniti na podlagi objektivnih kriterijev, ob upoštevanju posebnih značilnosti zadevnega sektorja ali njegovih zadevnih delov.
This assessment is, however, limited by the short deadlines applicable and by the need to rely on the information available to the Commission – either from already available sources or from the information obtained in the context of the application pursuant to Article 35 — which can not be supplemented by more time consuming methods, including, in particular, public inquiries addressed to the economic operators concerned.
Vendar to oceno otežujejo kratki roki, ki jih je treba spoštovati, in dejstvo, da mora temeljiti na informacijah, ki so Komisiji na voljo – bodisi iz že razpoložljivih virov bodisi iz informacij, pridobljenih v okviru uporabe člena 35 – in ki jih ni mogoče dopolniti z bolj zamudnimi metodami, vključno zlasti z javnimi preiskavami zadevnih gospodarskih subjektov.
The assessment of direct exposure to competition that can be carried out in the context of this Directive is consequently without prejudice to the full-fledged application of competition law.
Ocena neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci, ki se lahko opravi v okviru te direktive, zato ne posega v polno uporabo konkurenčnega prava.
Assessing whether a given sector, or parts thereof, is directly exposed to competition should be examined in respect of the specific area in which the activity, or the parts thereof concerned, are carried out by the relevant economic operators, the so-called ‘relevant geographical market’.
Pri ocenjevanju, ali je dani sektor neposredno izpostavljen konkurenci oziroma ali so konkurenci izpostavljeni njegovi deli, bi bilo treba preučiti tako imenovani „relevantni geografski trg“, to je specifično območje, na katerem zadevno dejavnost ali njene dele izvaja zadevni gospodarski subjekt.
As that notion is crucial for the assessment, it should be given an appropriate definition, based on existing notions in Union law.
Ker je ta pojem ključnega pomena za ocenjevanje, bi ga bilo treba ustrezno opredeliti na podlagi veljavnih pojmov iz prava Unije.
It should also be clarified that the relevant geographical market might not coincide with the territory of the Member State concerned; consequently, it should be possible to limit decisions concerning the applicability of the exemption to parts of the territory of the Member State concerned.
Prav tako bi bilo treba pojasniti, da se relevantni geografski trg morebiti ne ujema z ozemljem zadevne države članice; zato bi lahko bile odločitve glede uporabe izjeme omejene na dele ozemlja zadevne države članice.
The implementation and application of appropriate Union legislation opening a given sector, or a part thereof, should be considered to provide sufficient grounds for assuming that there is free access to the market in question.
Šteti bi se moralo, da sta izvajanje in uporaba ustrezne zakonodaje Unije o odprtju danega sektorja ali njegovega dela zadosten razlog za domnevo, da je do zadevnega trga zagotovljen prost dostop.
Such appropriate legislation should be identified in an annex which can be updated by the Commission.
Tako ustrezno zakonodajo bi bilo treba določiti v prilogi, ki jo lahko posodablja Komisija.
When updating that annex, the Commission should in particular take into account the possible adoption of measures entailing a genuine opening-up to competition of sectors other than those for which legislation is already referred to in that annex, such as that of national rail passenger transport.
Komisija bi morala pri posodabljanju navedene priloge upoštevati zlasti morebitno sprejetje ukrepov, ki bi omogočili, da se konkurenci resnično odprejo tudi drugi sektorji poleg tistih, za katere je zakonodaja že navedena v navedeni prilogi, kot je na primer nacionalni železniški potniški promet.
Where free access to a given market is not presumed on the basis of the implementation of appropriate Union legislation, it should be demonstrated that, de jure and de facto, such access is free.
Če prostega dostopa do danega trga ni mogoče predpostavljati na podlagi izvajanja ustrezne zakonodaje Unije, bi bilo treba dokazati, da je takšen dostop pravno in dejansko prost.
Where a Member State extends the application of a Union legal act opening up a given sector to competition to situations falling outside the scope of that legal act, for instance by applying Directive 94/22/EC to the coal sector or Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [18] to passenger service at the national level, that circumstance should be taken into account when assessing whether access to the sector concerned is free.
Če država članica uporabo pravnega akta Unije o odprtju danega sektorja konkurenci razširi na primere zunaj področja uporabe navedenega pravnega akta – denimo Direktivo 94/22/ES uporabi za sektor premogovništva ali Direktivo 2012/34/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [18] za potniške storitve na nacionalni ravni – bi bilo treba to okoliščino upoštevati pri ocenjevanju, ali je dostop do zadevnega sektorja prost.
Independent national authorities, such as sectoral regulators or competition authorities, normally possess specialised know-how, information and knowledge that would be pertinent when assessing whether a given activity or parts thereof are directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not limited.
Neodvisni nacionalni organi, kot so sektorski regulatorji ali organi za konkurenco, imajo običajno specializirano znanje in izkušnje ter informacije, ki bi bili relevantni pri ocenjevanju, ali je dana dejavnost neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen, oziroma ali to velja za njene dele.
Requests for exemption should therefore where appropriate be accompanied by, or incorporate, a recent position on the competitive situation in the sector concerned, adopted by an independent national authority that is competent in relation to the activity concerned.
Zahtevkom za izjemo bi torej po potrebi morali priložiti ali vanje vključiti posodobljeno mnenje o konkurenčnih razmerah v zadevnem sektorju, ki ga sprejme neodvisen nacionalni organ, pristojen za zadevno dejavnost.
In the absence of a reasoned and substantiated position adopted by an independent national authority that is competent in relation to the activity concerned, more time would be needed for the assessment of a request for exemption.
Če neodvisni nacionalni organ, pristojen za zadevno dejavnost, ne sprejme obrazloženega in utemeljenega mnenja, bi bilo za oceno zahtevka za izjemo potrebno več časa.
The periods within which the Commission must carry out its assessments of such requests should therefore be modified accordingly.
Roke, ki jih ima Komisija na voljo za izvedbo takih ocen, bi bilo torej treba ustrezno prilagoditi.
The Commission should always be obliged to examine requests, which are in conformity with the detailed rules for the application of the procedures for establishing whether a given activity, or parts thereof, is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted.
Komisija bi vedno morala preučiti zahtevke, ki upoštevajo podrobna pravila za uporabo postopkov za ugotavljanje, ali je dana dejavnost neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen, oziroma ali to velja za njene dele.
It should, however, also be clarified that the complexity of such requests may be such that it might not always be possible to ensure the adoption, within the applicable deadlines, of implementing acts establishing whether a given activity or parts thereof is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted.
Prav tako pa bi bilo treba pojasniti, da zaradi morebitne kompleksnosti takih zahtevkov morda ni vedno možno zagotoviti, da se v veljavnih rokih sprejmejo izvedbeni akti, v katerih se določi, ali je dana dejavnost neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen, oziroma ali to velja za njene dele.
It should be clarified that the Commission should have the possibility to require Member States or contracting entities to provide or to supplement or clarify information.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da bi Komisija morala imeti možnost, da od držav članic ali naročnikov zahteva predložitev informacij ali pa dopolnitev oziroma pojasnitev že danih informacij.
The Commission should set an appropriate time limit for so doing which, having due regard also to the need to meet the deadlines set for the Commission’s adoption of its implementing act, should take into account factors such as the complexity of the information requested and whether the information is readily accessible.
Komisija bi za to morala določiti ustrezen rok, pri katerem bi se upoštevali dejavniki, kot so kompleksnost zahtevanih informacij in težavnost dostopa do njih, pri čemer bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati tudi to, da mora Komisija spoštovati roke, določene za sprejetje izvedbenega akta.
Employment and occupation contribute to integration in society and are key elements in guaranteeing equal opportunities for all.
Zaposlitev in poklic prispevata k vključevanju v družbo in sta ključna elementa pri zagotavljanju enakih možnosti za vse.
The same is true for other social businesses whose main aim is to support the social and professional integration or reintegration of disabled and disadvantaged persons, such as the unemployed, members of disadvantaged minorities or otherwise socially marginalised groups.
Enako velja za druga socialna podjetja, katerih glavni cilj je podpreti družbeno in poklicno vključevanje ali ponovno vključevanje invalidnih in prikrajšanih oseb, na primer brezposelnih, pripadnikov prikrajšanih manjšin ali drugače socialno marginaliziranih skupin.
However, such workshops or businesses might not be able to obtain contracts under normal conditions of competition.
Vendar se lahko zgodi, da taka podjetja pod običajnimi konkurenčnimi pogoji ne morejo dobiti naročil.
Consequently, it is appropriate to provide that Member States should be able to reserve the right to participate in award procedures for public contracts or for certain lots thereof to such workshops or businesses or reserve performance of contracts to the context of sheltered employment programmes.
Zato je primerno določiti, da lahko države članice pravico do sodelovanja v postopkih javnega naročanja ali določenih sklopov teh javnih naročil pridržijo za taka podjetja ali da izvedbo javnih naročil pridržijo za programe zaščitnega zaposlovanja.
With a view to an appropriate integration of environmental, social and labour requirements into public procurement procedures it is of particular importance that Member States and contracting entities take relevant measures to ensure compliance with obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law that apply at the place where the works are executed or the services provided and result from laws, regulations, decrees and decisions, at both national and Union level, as well as from collective agreements, provided that such rules, and their application, comply with Union law.
Zaradi ustrezne vključitve okoljskih in socialnih zahtev ter zahtev s področja dela v postopke javnega naročanja je nadvse pomembno, da države članice in naročniki z ustreznimi ukrepi zagotovijo, da so izpolnjene obveznosti na področju okoljskega, socialnega in delovnega prava, ki veljajo na kraju izvajanja gradenj ali opravljanja storitev in izhajajo iz zakonov, uredb, odredb in sklepov, sprejetih na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Unije, pa tudi iz kolektivnih pogodb, če so takšna pravila in njihova uporaba skladna s pravom Unije.
Equally, obligations stemming from international agreements ratified by all Member States and listed in Annex XIV should apply during contract performance.
Pri izvajanju javnega naročila bi bilo treba spoštovati tudi obveznosti, ki izvirajo iz mednarodnih sporazumov, ki so jih ratificirale vse države članice in so navedeni v Prilogi XIV.
The relevant measures should be applied in conformity with the basic principles of Union law, in particular with a view to ensuring equal treatment.
Ustrezne ukrepe bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z osnovnimi načeli prava Unije, da se zagotovi zlasti enaka obravnava.
Such relevant measures should be applied in accordance with Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [19] and in a way that ensures equal treatment and does not discriminate directly or indirectly against economic operators and workers from other Member States.(53) Services should be considered to be provided at the place at which the characteristic performances are executed.
Takšne ustrezne ukrepe bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 96/71/ES [19] in na način, ki zagotavlja enako obravnavo ter ni neposredno ali posredno diskriminatoren do gospodarskih subjektov in delavcev iz drugih držav članic.(53) Za kraj opravljanja storitev bi moral šteti kraj, v katerem se izvajajo značilne naloge.
When services are provided at a distance, for example services provided by call centres, those services should be considered to be provided at the place where the services are executed, irrespective of the places and Member States to which the services are directed.
Če se storitve opravljajo na daljavo, kot na primer storitve klicnih centrov, bi bilo treba šteti, da je kraj opravljanja storitve kraj, v katerem se izvajajo, ne glede na kraje in države članice, ki so jim storitve namenjene.
The relevant obligations could be mirrored in contract clauses.
Zadevne obveznosti bi se lahko odražale v določilih pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naroča.
It should also be possible to include clauses ensuring compliance with collective agreements in compliance with Union law in public contracts.
Prav tako bi moralo bilo možno v pogodbe vključiti določila za zagotavljanje upoštevanja kolektivnih pogodb v skladu s pravom Unije.
Non-compliance with the relevant obligations could be considered to be grave misconduct on the part of the economic operator concerned, liable to exclusion of that economic operator from the procedure for the award of a public contract.
Neizpolnjevanje zadevnih obveznosti bi se lahko obravnavalo kot huda kršitev s strani zadevnega gospodarskega subjekta, zaradi katere je lahko ta gospodarski subjekt izključen iz postopka oddaje javnega naročanja.
Control of the observance of the environmental, social and labour law provisions should be performed at the relevant stages of the procurement procedure, when applying the general principles governing the choice of participants and the award of contracts, when applying the exclusion criteria and when applying the provisions concerning abnormally low tenders.
Upoštevanje določb okoljskega, socialnega in delovnega prava bi bilo treba spremljati v ustreznih fazah postopka javnega naročanja, to je pri uporabi splošnih načel, ki urejajo izbor udeležencev in oddajo javnih naročil, pri uporabi pogojev za izključitev in pri uporabi določb v zvezi z neobičajno nizkimi ponudbami.
Nothing in this Directive should prevent the imposition or enforcement of measures necessary to protect public policy, public morality, public security, health, human and animal life, the preservation of plant life or other environmental measures, in particular with a view to sustainable development, provided that those measures are in conformity with the TFEU.
Nobena določba v tej direktivi ne bi smela preprečiti uvedbe ali uveljavitve ukrepov, potrebnih za varovanje javnega reda, javne morale, javne varnosti, zdravja, življenja ljudi in živali, ohranitve rastlinskega življenja, ali drugih okoljskih ukrepov, zlasti zaradi trajnostnega razvoja, pod pogojem, da so ti ukrepi v skladu s PDEU.
Contracting entities should make the best strategic use of public procurement to spur innovation.
Naročniki bi morali zagotoviti najboljšo strateško uporabo naročil za spodbujanje inovacij.
Buying innovative products, works and services plays a key role in improving the efficiency and quality of public services while addressing major societal challenges.
Naročanje inovativnega blaga, gradenj in storitev ima ključno vlogo pri povečanju učinkovitosti in kakovosti javnih storitev ter spopadanju z velikimi družbenimi izzivi.
It contributes to achieving best value for money as well as wider economic, environmental and societal benefits in terms of generating new ideas, translating them into innovative products and services and thus promoting sustainable economic growth.
Prispeva k doseganju najboljšega razmerja med kakovostjo in ceno ter širših gospodarskih, okoljskih in družbenih koristi v smislu oblikovanja novih idej, njihovega prenosa v inovativne proizvode in storitve ter s tem spodbujanja trajnostne gospodarske rasti.
It should be recalled that a series of procurement models have been outlined in the Commission’s communication of 14 December 2007 entitled ‘Pre-commercial procurement: Driving innovation to ensure sustainable high quality public services in Europe’, which deals with the procurement of those R & D services not falling within the scope of this Directive.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba, da je bilo v sporočilu Komisije z dne 14. decembra 2007 z naslovom „Predkomercialna naročila: spodbujanje inovacij za zagotavljanje visokokakovostnih trajnostnih javnih storitev v Evropi“ opredeljenih več modelov javnega naročanja, ki zadevajo naročanje tistih raziskovalnih in razvojnih storitev, ki ne spadajo v področje uporabe te direktiv.
Those models would continue to be available, but this Directive should also contribute to facilitating procurement of innovation and help Member States in achieving the Innovation Union targets.
Ti modeli bi bili še naprej na voljo, a tudi ta direktiva bi morala prispevati k lažjemu javnemu naročanju na področju inovacij in državam članicam pomagati pri doseganju ciljev Unije inovacij.
Where a need for the development of an innovative product or service or innovative works and the subsequent purchase of the resulting supplies, services or works cannot be met by solutions already available on the market, contracting entities should have access to a specific procurement procedure in respect of contracts falling within the scope of this Directive.
Če rešitve, ki na trgu že obstajajo, ne morejo zadostiti potrebi po razvoju inovativnega proizvoda, storitve ali gradnje ter po njeni naknadni nabavi, bi morali naročniki imeti dostop do posebnega postopka javnega naročanja, kar zadeva javna naročila, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te direktive.
This specific procedure should allow contracting entities to establish a long-term innovation partnership for the development and subsequent purchase of a new, innovative product, service or works provided that such innovative product or service or innovative works can be delivered to agreed performance levels and costs, without the need for a separate procurement procedure for the purchase.
Posebni postopek bi moral naročnikom omogočiti, da za razvoj in naknadno nabavo novega, inovativnega proizvoda, storitve ali gradnje sklenejo dolgoročno partnerstvo za inovacije, če se ta inovativni proizvod, storitev ali gradnja lahko zagotovi v skladu z dogovorjeno kakovostjo izvedbe in dogovorjenimi stroški, ne da bi bil za nabavo potreben ločen postopek oddaje javnega naročila.