natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As mentioned in recital (169) to the provisional Regulation, during the investigation some indications were collected that even in the absence of support schemes demand still existed and will continue to exist in the Union.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (169) začasne uredbe, je bilo med preiskavo zbranih nekaj dokazov, ki kažejo, da bi povpraševanje v Uniji celo v odsotnosti shem podpore še vedno obstajalo in da se bo nadaljevalo.
The party did not provide any evidence which could have devaluated these findings.
Stran ni predložila nobenih dokazov, ki bi lahko zmanjšali pomen teh ugotovitev.
In the absence of any new information in this regard, the findings set out in recital (169) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed and the claim made in this regard was rejected.
Ker ni bilo predloženih novih informacij v zvezi s tem, se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (169) začasne uredbe potrdijo, trditev v zvezi s tem pa se zavrne.
Following final disclosure, the GOC argued that the fact that the Union industry's capacity did in any event not meet the Union demand is irrelevant since the sales volume of modules of the Union industry decreased in line with the decrease in consumption and reiterated that the decrease in consumption between 2011 and the IP caused the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Po dokončnem razkritju je kitajska vlada trdila, da je dejstvo, da zmogljivost industrije Unije ni v nobenem primeru izpolnila zahteve Unije, nepomembno, saj se je obseg prodaje modulov industrije Unije zmanjšal v skladu z zmanjšanjem potrošnje, ob tem pa je ponovila, da je zmanjšanje potrošnje med letom 2011 in OP povzročilo znatno škodo, ki jo utrpela industrija Unije.
While indeed between 2011 and the IP the Union consumption decrease and the sales volume of modules decreased with a similar trend, this has to be seen in relation to the development of the Chinese dumped prices, significantly undercutting the Union industry prices, thus forcing the Union industry selling at losses.
Ker sta se potrošnja in obseg prodaje modulov med letom 2011 in OP dejansko zmanjševala na podoben način, je treba to upoštevati skupaj z razvojem kitajskih dampinških cen, ki so bistveno prispevale k nelojalnem nižanju cen industrije Unije in s tem slednjo prisilile, da je prodajala z izgubo.
In this regard it is recalled, as mentioned in recital (111) to the provisional Regulation, that the dumped imports from the PRC either maintained their market share (modules) or increased it (cells) when the consumption was decreasing.
Glede tega je treba opozoriti, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (111) začasne uredbe, da je ob zmanjševanju potrošnje dampinški uvoz iz LRK bodisi ohranil svoj tržni delež (moduli) ali ga povečal (celice).
At the same time Chinese import prices decreased significantly and substantially undercut the Union industry's sales prices.
Obenem so se bistveno znižale kitajske uvozne cene, ki so bistveno prispevale k nelojalnem znižanju prodajnih cen industrije Unije.
In the absence of any other comments with regard to the development of Union consumption, the findings in recitals (168) and (169) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z razvojem potrošnje Unije, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (168) in (169) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Feed-in-tariffs (‘FITs’) as the main example of support schemes
Tarife za dovajanje toka kot glavni primer shem podpore
Following the provisional disclosure several parties reiterated that the injury suffered by the Union industry was caused by the development of the feed-in-tariffs (‘FITs’).
Po začasnem razkritju je več strani ponovno poudarilo, da je škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, povzročil razvoj tarif za dovajanje toka.
They claimed that the FIT developments exercised a strong downward pressure on prices and therefore on the profitability of the Union industry.
Trdile so, da je razvoj tarif za dovajanje toka povzročil močan pritisk na znižanje cen in s tem na dobičkonosnost industrije Unije.
One interested party claimed that only the impact of the development of FITs on the demand was examined, while the impact on prices should also have been analysed.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da je bil proučen samo učinek razvoja tarif za dovajanje toka na povpraševanje, medtem ko bi bilo treba analizirati tudi učinek na cene.
In the same context, several interested parties argued that most of the Member States implemented major cutbacks already in 2010 thus putting a downward pressure on the module prices.
V zvezi s tem je več zainteresiranih strani trdilo, da je večina držav članic izvedla znatna znižanja že v letu 2010 in tako ustvarila pritisk na znižanje cen modulov.
In respect of this claim it should be noted that the Member States implemented FIT cutbacks at different moments in time and at different speeds and that drawing a general picture for the entire Union is rather difficult.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je treba opozoriti, da so države članice tarife za dovajanje toka znižale v različnih obdobjih in z različno hitrostjo ter da je precej težko ustvariti splošno sliko za celotno Unijo.
Irrespective of the moment when the FIT rates reached very low levels, the significant decrease in the Union prices and profitability during the period considered cannot be solely or mainly explained by the reduction of FITs.
Ne glede na obdobje, ko so stopnje tarif za dovajanje toka dosegle zelo nizko raven, znatnega znižanja cen Unije in njene dobičkonosnosti v obravnavanem obdobju ni mogoče pojasniti zgolj ali predvsem z znižanjem tarif za dovajanje toka.
First, on the basis of the information collected for Germany and Italy that represented together around 75 % of the Union market in 2011, the drop in the average sales price was more pronounced than the decrease in the FIT rates during the IP.
Prvič, glede na informacije, zbrane za Nemčijo in Italijo, ki sta v letu 2011 skupaj predstavljali približno 75 % trga Unije, je bilo zmanjšanje povprečne prodajne cene izrazitejše od zmanjšanja stopenj tarif za dovajanje toka v OP.
Second, the evidence collected shows that, for some countries such as Italy, even in the context of very generous FIT rates, the Union industry had to decrease significantly their prices.
Drugič, zbrani dokazi kažejo, da je morala industrija Unije v nekaterih državah, kot je Italija, znatno znižati svoje cene, celo kadar so bile stopnje tarif za dovajanje toka zelo ugodne.
Finally, during the IP, the Union producers had to sell at prices below their cost of production, which was mainly a consequence of the fact that the Chinese exporting producers had 80 % of the Union market and therefore the power to influence the price-setting mechanism.
Nazadnje so morali proizvajalci Unije v OP prodajati po cenah, nižjih od stroškov proizvodnje, kar je bilo zlasti posledica dejstva, da so imeli kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki 80-odstotni delež na trgu Unije in so zato lahko vplivali na mehanizme določanja cen.
The investigation further established that up to 2011 the higher FIT rates together with the decrease in the prices of modules in the Union rendered the investments in solar energy extremely attractive as investors were earning very high rates on return.
Preiskava je pokazala tudi, da so bile naložbe v sončno energijo do leta 2011 zelo privlačne zaradi višjih tarif za dovajanje toka in znižanja cen modulov v Uniji, saj so imeli vlagatelji zelo visoke stopnje donosnosti.
Therefore, this resulted in a high number of investments and consequently high demand of solar panels.
Zato je bilo število naložb visoko, povpraševanje po solarnih panelih pa veliko.
As a consequence of the increased demand, the total amount of FITs paid increased significantly and most Member States revised the existing FIT schemes downwards to avoid inter alia an increase of electricity costs.
Zaradi večjega povpraševanja se je skupni znesek izplačanih tarif za dovajanje toka znatno povečal in večina držav članic je z znižanjem tarif spremenila obstoječe sheme, da bi med drugim preprečila povečanje stroškov električne energije.
This shows that FIT cutbacks may also have been the result of the decreasing prices and not vice versa.
To kaže, da bi lahko bila znižanja tarif za dovajanje toka posledica znižanja cen in ne obratno.
After final disclosure one party claimed that there was a contradiction between the recital (246) above, that an assessment of the demand for the Union as a whole is difficult, and the recital (223) above stating that a causation analysis per Member State would not lead to meaningful results.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena stran trdila, da sta uvodna izjava (246) o tem, da je težko oceniti povpraševanje na ravni celotne Unije, in uvodna izjava (223) o tem, da analiza vzročne zveze za vsako državo članico posebej ne bi pokazala pomembnih rezultatov, protislovni.
In this respect, it is clarified that in the assessment made in recital (246) above, reference is made to the difficulty to draw a general picture of the FIT developments for the entire Union and not to the Union demand as claimed by the interested party.
V zvezi s tem je pojasnjeno, da se ocena iz uvodne izjave (246) sklicuje na težave pri ustvarjanju splošnega pregleda razvoja tarif za dovajanje toka za celotno Unijo in ne na povpraševanje v Uniji, kot trdi zainteresirana stran.
As a consequence, it follows that no contradiction exists between the two recitals and therefore the claim was rejected.
To pomeni, da uvodni izjavi nista protislovni, zato je bila trditev zavrnjena.
After final disclosure, one party claimed that even in the context of high FIT rates, the module price may decrease significantly due to technological development, economies of scale, cost reductions and growing global production capacity.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena stran trdila, da se cene modulov tudi na podlagi visokih tarif za dovajanje toka lahko bistveno znižajo zaradi tehnološkega razvoja, ekonomije obsega, znižanja stroškov in naraščajoče svetovne proizvodne zmogljivosti.
In respect of this claim, it is noted that the evidence collected shows that the Italian producers had to reduce their prices below the cost of production even when FIT rates were high.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je treba opozoriti, da zbrani dokazi kažejo, da so italijanski proizvajalci tudi v primeru, ko so bile tarife za dovajanje toka visoke, morali znižati svoje cene do te mere, da so bile nižje od stroškov proizvodnje.
While the factors mentioned above may indeed have had an impact on the average costs they cannot explain why Union producers had to reduce their prices below their cost of production.
Medtem ko ti dejavniki dejansko lahko vplivajo na povprečne stroške, pa ne morejo pojasniti, zakaj so morali proizvajalci Unije znižati svoje cene do te mere, da so bile nižje od stroškov proizvodnje.
Therefore, it is concluded that it was mainly the dumped imports from the PRC that pushed the prices to unsustainable levels and this claim was rejected.
Zato se sklene, da so cene dosegle nevzdržne ravni predvsem zaradi dampinškega uvoza iz LRK, zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
After final disclosure, one party claimed that the conclusion drawn in recital (247) above, that FIT cutbacks may have also been the result of the decreasing prices and not vice versa, is not supported by any evidence.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena stran trdila, da sklep iz uvodne izjave (247), da bi lahko bila znižanja tarif za dovajanje toka posledica znižanja cen in ne obratno, ni podprt z nobenimi dokazi.
It is noted that the conclusions drawn in recital (247) above were based on the information available during the investigation and the scenario described was indeed considered as reasonable given the circumstances in this specific market.
Treba je opozoriti, da so sklepi iz uvodne izjave (247) temeljili na informacijah, ki so bile dostopne med preiskavo, opisan scenarij pa se je dejansko štel za razumnega glede na okoliščine na tem določenem trgu.
Therefore, this argument was rejected.
Zato je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
After final disclosure, one party reiterated that it disagreed with the conclusion that the downward price pressure on Union producers was mainly exerted by the dumped imports and claimed that, to the contrary, it was the FIT cutbacks that forced the Union producers to reduce their prices.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena stran ponovila, da se ne strinja s sklepom, da je negativni cenovni pritisk na proizvajalce Unije predvsem posledica dampinškega uvoza, in je trdila, da so, ravno nasprotno, proizvajalce Unije k nižanju cen prisilila znižanja tarif za dovajanje toka.
The same party reiterated that when FITs were reduced, the PV system prices decreased in line with the decrease in FITs so that costs for project developers do not increase, which ultimately caused the price pressure on the Union producers.
Ista stran je ponovila, da so se v času znižanja tarif za dovajanje toka sočasno znižale tudi cene fotonapetostnih sistemov, da se ne bi povečali stroški razvijalcev projektov, kar je na koncu povzročilo cenovni pritisk na proizvajalce Unije.
Since no conclusive evidence was brought in support of these claims, the Commission maintained its analysis and conclusions as stated in recitals (246) to (247) above.
Ker te trditve niso bile podprte z nobenimi prepričljivimi dokazi, je Komisija vztrajala pri svoji analizi in sklepih, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah (246) in (247).
The same party claimed that markets are driven by the development of FITs and provided information showing the number of PV installations for the years 2012 and 2013 in the UK.
Ista stran je trdila, da trge usmerja razvoj tarif za dovajanje toka, in predložila informacije o številu fotonapetostnih naprav v letih 2012 in 2013 v Združenem kraljestvu.
The information provided by this party was a publication of the UK government based on the weekly registrations in the UK Central FiT Register (CFR).
Pri teh informacijah, ki jih je predložila ta stran, je šlo za publikacijo vlade Združenega kraljestva, ki temelji na tedenskih registracijah v Centralnem registru tarif za dovajanje toka v Združenem kraljestvu.
It is noted that this information related mostly to a period outside the IP and referred only to one Member State, while the current investigation focused on the situation of the Union market as a whole.
Treba je opozoriti, da ta informacija velja predvsem za obdobje zunaj OP in samo za eno državo članico, medtem ko je sedanja preiskava osredotočena na položaj trga Unije v celoti.
In any event, it is not contested that FIT levels influence demand, as the profitability of investments in locations with less solar radiation depends on the FIT level.
Vsekakor se ne izpodbija, da ravni tarif za dovajanje toka vplivajo na povpraševanje, saj je dobičkonosnost naložb na lokacijah z manjšim sončnim sevanjem odvisna od teh ravni.
However, in order to show that the level at which FIT were set during the IP has caused the injury, interested parties would have had to show that a price increase of the Union producers to the non-injurious level would have meant that the Union producers would not have been able to sell the product concerned because investments into PV systems would not have been viable at those price levels.
Vendar bi morale zainteresirane strani, da bi dokazale, da je raven tarife za dovajanje toka, kot je bila določena v OP, povzročila škodo, pokazati, da bi znižanje cen proizvajalcev Unije na neškodljivo raven pomenilo, da proizvajalci Unije ne bi mogli prodati zadevnega izdelka, ker naložbe v fotonapetostne sisteme pri navedenih ravneh cen ne bi bile uspešne.
No such evidence has been provided.
Takšni dokazi niso bili predloženi.
Therefore, the argument that the reductions in FITs broke the causal link between the dumped imports and the material injury suffered by the Union industry was rejected.
Zato je bil argument, da je znižanje tarif za dovajanje toka prekinilo vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, zavrnjen.
Following the provisional disclosure one party reiterated that FIT developments rendered the solar investment opportunities unattractive for investors and thus lowered the demand for the product.
Po začasnem razkritju je ena stran ponovno poudarila, da so priložnosti za vlaganje v sončno energijo postale neprivlačne za vlagatelje zaradi razvoja tarif za dovajanje toka in da se je zato povpraševanje po izdelku zmanjšalo.
Another party claimed that the findings set out in recital (173) to the provisional Regulation that investments are still being made in Spain despite the suspension of the FIT schemes was incorrect.
Druga stran je trdila, da ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave (173) začasne uredbe, da se naložbe v Španiji še vedno izvajajo kljub ukinitvi sheme tarif za dovajanje toka, ni pravilna.
The impact of FITs on demand was addressed in recital (173) to the provisional Regulation.
Vpliv tarif za dovajanje toka na povpraševanje je bil obravnavan v uvodni izjavi (173) začasne uredbe.
As no new arguments were brought forward in this respect, the above claim that demand decreased due to the FIT developments was rejected.
Ker glede tega niso bili predloženi novi argumenti, je bila navedena trditev, da se je povpraševanje zmanjšalo zaradi razvoja tarif za dovajanje toka, zavrnjena.
Regarding the investments in Spain, it is clarified that the findings in recital (177) to the provisional Regulation are based on information obtained during the investigation and verified during an on-spot investigation.
Glede naložb v Španiji je treba pojasniti, da ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (177) začasne uredbe temeljijo na informacijah, ki so bile pridobljene med preiskavo in preverjene v okviru preveritve na kraju samem.
As the party concerned did not provide any new information or evidence in this respect, this claim had to be rejected.
Ker zadevna stran ni zagotovila novih informacij ali dokazov v zvezi s tem, je bilo treba to trditev zavrniti.
Following the provisional disclosure several parties claimed that in the context of the low FIT rates, investments in PV projects were economically viable only when supplied with the lower priced solar panels imported from the PRC.
V zvezi z nizkimi stopnjami tarif za dovajanje toka je po začasnem razkritju več strani trdilo, da so bile naložbe v fotonapetostne projekte ekonomsko uspešne le v primerih, ko je bila zagotovljena oskrba s cenejšimi solarnimi paneli, uvoženimi iz LRK.
Therefore, it was argued that the FIT cutbacks caused the material injury to the Union industry.
Zato so trdile, da so zmanjšanja tarif za dovajanje toka povzročila znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Another party argued that the level of the FIT rate influences the price setting mechanism for modules.
Druga stran je trdila, da stopnja tarif za dovajanje toka vpliva na mehanizme določanja cen modulov.
It should be noted that the cost of a module at which a project would still be economically viable varies by Member State or by region in function of numerous factors such as FITs, other regulatory incentives, solar exposure, conventional electricity prices, etc.
Treba je opozoriti, da se stroški modula, s katerimi bi bil projekt ekonomsko uspešen, razlikujejo glede na državo članico ali regijo in so odvisni od številnih dejavnikov, kot so tarife za dovajanje toka, druge regulativne pobude, izpostavljenost soncu, cene konvencionalne električne energije itd.
In addition, the investigation showed that current installations depend less and less on the FITs as PV grid parity is likely to have been reached for certain types of installations in several regions in Europe, such as a large portion of Italy, Spain, Portugal, southern France and Greece.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da so obstoječe naprave vse manj odvisne od tarif za dovajanje toka, saj bodo določene vrste naprav verjetno dosegle pariteto fotonapetostnega omrežja v več regijah v Evropi, kot so velik del Italije, Španija, Portugalska, južna Francija in Grčija.
On the above grounds, the claims made in this regard were rejected.
Zaradi navedenih razlogov so bile trditve v zvezi s tem zavrnjene.
One interested party claimed that the Commission did not investigate whether the Union industry failed to anticipate that government support schemes would be abruptly withdrawn or decreased.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da Komisija ni proučila, ali industrija Unije ni predvidevala, da bodo državne sheme podpore nenadoma ukinjene ali zmanjšane.
No arguments were brought in support of this claim.
V podporo tej trditvi niso bili predloženi nobeni argumenti.
However, it should be noted that, based on the evidence collected, there is no information indicating that the Union industry responded to the market signals (i.e. development in consumption) and other available information (i.e. reduction in support schemes) in an unreasonable way.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da glede na zbrane dokaze ni nobenih informacij, ki bi kazale, da se je industrija Unije na tržne razmere (tj. razvoj potrošnje) in druge razpoložljive informacije (tj. zmanjšanje shem podpore) odzvala na nerazumen način.
One interested party argued that the FIT cutbacks caused the Union industry's sales decline because investments had been viable only at the affordable Chinese prices.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da se je prodaja industrije Unije zmanjšala zaradi znižanj tarif za dovajanje toka, saj so bile naložbe uspešne le, če so se izdelki kupovali po ugodnih kitajskih cenah.
The evidence collected in fact shows only a slight decrease in the sales of the Union industry during the IP, in contrast to what it would be expected had the PV projects been feasible only with Chinese modules.
Zbrani dokazi dejansko kažejo le, da se je prodaja industrije Unije v OP nekoliko zmanjšala, kar je v nasprotju s tem, kar bi se pričakovalo, če bi bili fotonapetostni projekti uspešni samo s kitajskimi moduli.
On the contrary, the sales of modules of the Union industry increased until 2011 and then slightly decreased in the IP, following the same trend as of the consumption.
Ravno nasprotno, prodaja modulov industrije Unije se je povečevala do leta 2011 in se nato nekoliko zmanjšala v OP, kar je v skladu s trendom potrošnje.
Another interested party argued that the findings as set out in recitals (174) and (175) to the provisional Regulation that the FIT changes did not break the causal link has no factual or legal basis and is inconsistent with Article 3(7) of the basic Regulation because the Commission failed to assess the level of injury caused by the FIT reductions and because it considered that the significant drop in the Union industry's price had been a consequence only of the dumped Chinese imports.
Druga zainteresirana stran je trdila, da ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (174) in (175) začasne uredbe, da spremembe tarif za dovajanje toka niso prekinile vzročne zveze, nimajo niti dejanske niti pravne podlage in niso v skladu s členom 3(7) osnovne uredbe, ker Komisija ni ocenila ravni škode, ki so jo povzročila znižanja tarif za dovajanje toka, in ker je menila, da je bil znaten padec cen industrije Unije posledica izključno kitajskega dampinškega uvoza.
The same party argued that the decrease in the price of modules, cells and wafers was a global phenomenon and not due to the pressure of the Chinese imports.
Ista stran je trdila, da je bilo znižanje cen modulov, celic in rezin svetovni pojav, ne pa posledica pritiska kitajskega uvoza.