natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Minimum content of the additive when used without combination with other micro-organisms as silage additives: 1 × 108 CFU/Kg fresh material.
Najmanjša vsebnost dodatka, kadar se ne uporablja v kombinaciji z drugimi mikroorganizmi kot silirnimi dodatki: 1 × 108 CFU/kg sveže snovi.
For safety: it is recommended to use breathing protection, eye protection and gloves during handling.
Zaradi varnosti se pri ravnanju z dodatkom priporoča uporaba zaščite za dihala, zaščite za oči in rokavic.
DSM 22502 containing a minimum of 1 × 1011 CFU/g additive.
DSM 22502 z najnižjo vsebnostjo 1 × 1011 CFU/g dodatka
Preparation of Pediococcus acidilactici
pripravek Pediococcus acidilactici
CNCM I-3237 containing a minimum of 1 × 1010 CFU/g additive.
CNCM I-3237 z najnižjo vsebnostjo 1 × 1010 CFU/g dodatka
Viable cells of Pediococcus acidilactic
žive celice Pediococcus acidilactic
Minimum content of the additive when used without combination with other micro-organisms as silage additives: 5 × 107 CFU/Kg fresh material.
Najmanjša vsebnost dodatka, kadar se ne uporablja v kombinaciji z drugimi mikroorganizmi kot silirnimi dodatki: 5 × 107 CFU/kg sveže snovi.
NCIMB 10415.
NCIMB 10415
DSM 22502.
DSM 22502
CNCM I-3237.
CNCM I-3237
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 305/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 305/2014
concerning the authorisation of propionic acid, sodium propionate and ammonium propionate as feed additives for all animal species other than ruminants, pigs and poultry
o izdaji dovoljenja za propionsko kislino, natrijev propionat in amonijev propionat kot krmne dodatke za vse živalske vrste, razen za prežvekovalce, prašiče in perutnino
The additive was authorised for 10 years by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1222/2013 [2] for ruminants, pigs and poultry.
Dodatek je bil z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 1222/2013 [2] dovoljen za deset let za prežvekovalce, prašiče in perutnino.
The European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’) concluded in its opinion of 16 November 2011 [3] that, under the proposed conditions of use, propionic acid, sodium propionate and ammonium propionate do not have an adverse effect on animal health, human health or the environment.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane („Agencija“) je v mnenju z dne 16. novembra 2011 [3] navedla, da propionska kislina, natrijev propionat in amonijev propionat pod predlaganimi pogoji uporabe nimajo škodljivega vpliva na zdravje živali in ljudi ali na okolje.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1222/2013 of 29 November 2013 concerning the authorisation of propionic acid, sodium propionate and ammonium propionate as feed additives for ruminants, pigs and poultry (OJ L 320, 30.11.2013, p. 16).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1222/2013 z dne 29. novembra 2013 o izdaji dovoljenja za propionsko kislino, natrijev propionat in amonijev propionat kot krmne dodatke za prežvekovalce, prašiče in perutnino (UL L 320, 30.11.2013, str. 16).
All animal species other than ruminants, pigs and poultry
Vse živalske vrste, razen prežvekovalcev, prašičev in perutnine
The simultaneous use of other organic acids at the maximum permitted doses is contraindicated.
Sočasna uporaba drugih organskih kislin je pri največjih dovoljenih odmerkih kontraindicirana.
For safety: breathing protection, eye protection, gloves and protective clothing shall be used during handling.
Zaradi varnosti je treba pri ravnanju z dodatkom uporabljati zaščito za dihala, zaščito za oči, rokavice in zaščitno obleko.
Water insoluble ≤ 0,1 %
V vodi netopna snov ≤ 0,1 %
ion exclusion High Performance Liquid Chromatography with refractive index detection (HPLC-RI) — for the determination of total propionate; and
ionska izključitvena tekočinska kromatografija visoke ločljivosti z detekcijo na osnovi lomnega količnika (HPLC-RI) – za določanje skupnega propionata; in
atomic absorption spectrometry, AAS (EN ISO 6869) — for the determination of total sodium.
atomska absorpcijska spektrometrija, AAS (EN ISO 6869) – za določanje skupnega natrija.
Preparation of ammonium propionate ≥ 19,0 %, propionic acid ≤ 80,0 % and water ≤ 30 %
Pripravek amonijevega propionata ≥ 19,0 %, propionske kisline ≤ 80 % in vode ≤ 30 %
CAS No.: 17496-08-1
št. CAS 17496-08-1
Method of Analysis [2]Quantification of the ammonium propionate in feed additive:
Analitska metoda [2]Določanje količine amonijevega propionata v krmnem dodatku:
titration with sulphuric acid and sodium hydroxide for the determination of ammonia.
titracija z žvepleno kislino in natrijevim hidroksidom za določanje amoniaka.
Quantification of ammonium propionate as total propionic acid in premixtures, feedingstuffs: ion exclusion High Performance Liquid Chromatography with refractive index (HPLC-RI)
Določanje količine amonijevega propionata kot skupne propionske kisline v premiksih in krmi: ionska izključitvena tekočinska kromatografija visoke ločljivosti z lomnim količnikom (HPLC-RI)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 306/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 306/2014
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 307/2014
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 307/2014
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 875/2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels originating in Thailand following an interim review pursuant of Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 875/2013 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst pripravljene ali konzervirane sladke koruze v zrnju s poreklom iz Tajske po vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom člena 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(3) Uredbe,
Following an investigation (‘the original investigation’), the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 [2], imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels currently falling within CN codes ex20019030 and ex20058000 originating in Thailand.
Po preiskavi („prvotna preiskava“) je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 682/2007 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih vrst pripravljene ali konzervirane sladke koruze v zrnju, uvrščene pod oznaki KN ex20019030 in ex20058000 s poreklom s Tajske.
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty ranging between 3,1 % and 12,9 %.
Ukrepi so bili sprejeti kot dajatev ad valorem v obsegu od 3,1 % do 12,9 %.
By Regulation (EC) No 954/2008 [3], the Council amended the measures in force with regard to one exporting producer and consequently the rate applicable to ‘all other companies’, thereafter ranging between 3,1 % and 14,3 %.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 954/2008 [3] je Svet spremenil veljavne ukrepe v zvezi z enim proizvajalcem izvoznikom in zato je stopnja, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“, v obsegu od 3,1 % do 14,3 %.
Following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation (‘the expiry review’) the Council, by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 875/2013 [4], maintained the duty ranging between 3,1 % and 14,3 %.
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe(„pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa“) je Svet z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 875/2013 [4] ohranil dajatev v obsegu od 3,1 % do 14,3 %.
The European Commission (‘the Commission’) received a request for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je prejela zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
This request was lodged by River Kwai International Food Industry Co. Ltd (‘the applicant’), an exporting producer from Thailand.
Ta zahtevek je vložila družba River Kwai International Food Industry Co. Ltd. („vložnik“), proizvajalec izvoznik s Tajske.
The request was limited in scope to the examination of dumping as far as the applicant was concerned.
Zahtevek je bil po obsegu omejen na preiskavo dampinga vložnika.
In its request, the applicant provided prima facie evidence that, as far as the dumping by the applicant is concerned, the circumstances on the basis of which the measures in force were imposed have changed and that these changes were of a lasting nature.
V svoji vlogi je vložnik predložil dokaze prima facie, da so se v primeru dampinga vložnika spremenile okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni veljavni ukrepi, in da so te spremembe trajne.
In particular, the applicant claimed that the changed circumstances relate to changes in the product range it commercialises which have a direct impact on the cost of production thereof.
Vložnik zlasti trdi, da imajo spremenjene okoliščine, ki se nanašajo na spremembe obsega izdelkov, ki jih trži, neposreden vpliv na stroške proizvodnje izdelkov.
A comparison of its domestic prices with its export prices to the Union indicated that the dumping margin appeared to be lower than the current level of measures.
Primerjava njegovih domačih cen z izvoznimi cenami v Uniji kaže, da je stopnja dampinga nižja od trenutne ravni ukrepov.
The Commission determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed to justify the initiation of a partial interim review limited to the examination of dumping as far as the applicant is concerned.
Komisija je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstaja dovolj dokazov, ki opravičujejo začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda, omejenega na preiskavo dampinga zadevnega vložnika.
On this basis, it announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5] on 14 February 2013 (‘the notice of initiation’), the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi tega je z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5] dne 14. februarja 2013 („obvestilo o začetku“), naznanila začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 July 2011 to 31 December 2012 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2011 do 31. decembra 2012 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The Commission officially advised the applicant, representatives of the exporting country, as well as the association of Union producers (Association Européenne des Transformateurs de Maïs Doux ‘AETMD’) of the initiation of the interim review.
Komisija je o začetku vmesnega pregleda uradno obvestila vložnika, predstavnike države izvoznice in združenje proizvajalcev Unije (Association Européenne des Transformateurs de Maïs Doux „AETMD“).
The written comments submitted by AETMD were considered and, where appropriate, taken into account.
Pisne pripombe, ki jih je predložil AETMD, so bile obravnavane, in kjer je bilo to primerno, upoštevane.
The Commission carried out a verification visit at the premises of the applicant in Thailand in Bangkok and Kanchanaburi.
Komisija je preveritveni obisk opravila v prostorih vložnika v Bangkoku in Kanchanaburi na Tajskem.
The product under this review is the same as that defined in the original investigation and in the expiry review, namely sweetcorn (Zea mays var. saccharata) in kernels, prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen, currently falling within CN code ex20019030, and sweetcorn (Zea mays var. saccharata) in kernels, prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen, other than products of heading 2006, currently falling within CN code ex20058000, originating in Thailand.
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva ta pregled, je enak kot tisti, ki je opredeljen v prvotni preiskavi ter v pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, in sicer sladka koruza (Zea mays var. saccharata) v zrnju, pripravljena ali konzervirana v kisu ali ocetni kislini, nezamrznjena, trenutno uvrščena pod oznako KN ex20019030, in sladka koruza (Zea mays var. saccharata) v zrnju, pripravljena ali konzervirana drugače kot v kisu ali ocetni kislini, nezamrznjena, razen proizvodov iz tarifne številke 2006, trenutno uvrščenih pod oznako KN ex20058000, s poreklom s Tajske.
As established in the original investigation and confirmed in the expiry review, sweetcorn produced and sold in the Union and sweetcorn produced and sold in Thailand was found to have essentially the same physical and chemical characteristics and the same basic uses as sweetcorn produced in Thailand and sold for export to the Union.
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno v prvotni preiskavi in potrjeno v pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, imata sladka koruza, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v Uniji, in sladka koruza, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na Tajskem, dejansko enake fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo kot sladka koruza, proizvedena na Tajskem in prodana za izvoz v Unijo.
In accordance with the first sentence of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first established whether the applicant’s total domestic sales of the like product during the RIP were representative.
V skladu s prvim stavkom člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej ugotavljala, ali je bila vložnikova celotna domača prodaja podobnega izdelka v OPP reprezentativna.
The domestic sales are representative if the total domestic sales volume of the like product represented at least 5 % of the total export sales volume of the product concerned to the Union during the RIP.
Domača prodaja je reprezentativna, če je skupni obseg domače prodaje podobnega izdelka predstavljal vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo v OPP.
Total domestic sales of the like product were found to be representative.
Za celotno domačo prodajo podobnega izdelka je bilo ugotovljeno, da je reprezentativna.
The Commission subsequently identified the product types sold domestically that were identical or directly comparable with the types sold for export to the Union.
Komisija je nato opredelila, katere vrste izdelka, prodane na domačem trgu, so enake ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Unijo.
For each of those product types, the Commission established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je za vsako posamezno vrsto izdelkov določila, ali je domača prodaja dovolj reprezentativna v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
The domestic sales of a product type are representative if the total volume of domestic sales of that product type to independent customers during the RIP represents at least 5 % of the total volume of export sales to the Union of the identical or comparable product type.
Domača prodaja vrste izdelka je reprezentativna, če skupni obseg domače prodaje te vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam v OPP predstavlja vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza enake ali podobne vrste izdelka v Unijo.
The Commission established that, for all the product types sold for export to the Union, the applicant’s domestic sales were made in representative quantities.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je bila za vse vrste izdelka, prodane za izvoz v Unijo, vložnikova domača prodaja v reprezentativnih količinah.
Next, the Commission defined the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers on the domestic market for each product type during the RIP in order to decide whether to use actual domestic sales for the calculation of the normal value in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Nato je Komisija določila delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam na domačem trgu za vsako vrsto izdelka v OPP, da se odloči, ali bo uporabila dejansko domačo prodajo za izračun normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
The normal value is based on the actual domestic price per product type irrespective of whether the sales are profitable or not, if:
Normalna vrednost temelji na dejanski domači ceni za posamezno vrsto izdelka ne glede na to, ali je bila prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne, če je
the sales volume of the product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of this product type, and
obseg prodaje vrste izdelka, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, enaki izračunanim stroškom proizvodnje ali višji od njih, predstavljal več kot 80 % skupnega obsega prodaje tiste vrste izdelka, in je bila
the weighted average sales price of that product type is equal to or higher than the unit cost of production.
tehtana povprečna prodajna cena te vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto.
The Commission’s analysis of domestic sales showed that more than 90 % of domestic sales were profitable and that the weighted average sales price was higher than the unit cost of production.
Analiza domače prodaje, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, je pokazala, da je bilo več kot 90 % domače prodaje dobičkonosne in da je bila tehtana povprečna prodajna cena višja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto.
Accordingly, the normal value was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales during the RIP.
V skladu s tem je bila normalna vrednost izračunana kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje v OPP.
Determination of the Export price
Določanje izvozne cene
All sales by the applicant for export to the Union were made directly to unrelated customers in the Union or Thailand.
Celotna prodaja vložnika za izvoz v Unijo je bila opravljena neposredno z neodvisnimi strankami v Uniji ali na Tajskem.
The export price is therefore established on the basis of prices paid or payable, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Izvozna cena je zato določena na podlagi cen, ki so bile plačane ali se plačujejo v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission compared the normal value and the export price on an ex-works basis.
Komisija je primerjala normalno vrednost in izvozno ceno na podlagi franko tovarna.
Where justified, the Commission adjusted the normal value and/or the export price for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar je to utemeljeno, je Komisija prilagodila normalno vrednost in/ali izvozno ceno za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Adjustments for differences in transport costs, insurance costs, handling and loading costs, packaging, commissions, credit costs and bank charges were granted when applicable and duly justified.
Prilagoditve za razlike v prevoznih stroških, stroških zavarovanja, obdelave in nakladanja, pakiranja, stroških provizij, kredita in bančnih stroških so se odobrile, če je bilo to potrebno in ustrezno utemeljeno.
The applicant claimed an allowance under Article 2(10)(d) of the basic Regulation for a difference in brand value when sold under own brand on the domestic market and when sold under own brand on the Union market.
Vložnik je zahteval popravek v skladu s členom 2(10)(d) osnovne uredbe za razliko v vrednosti blagovne znamke, ko se prodaja pod lastno blagovno znamko na domačem trgu, in pri prodaji pod lastno blagovno znamko na trgu Unije.
Allegedly, the brand value of the applicant’s own brand is higher on the Thai market than on the Union market.
Domnevno je vrednost blagovne znamke vložnikove lastne blagovne znamke na tajskem trgu višja kot na trgu Unije.
To justify its claim the applicant made reference to the adjustment made in the original investigation and in the expiry review.
Da bi utemeljil svojo trditev, se je vložnik skliceval na prilagoditev v prvotni preiskavi in v pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa.
However, the applicant’s situation in this interim review differs from the situation of other exporting producers for which the adjustment was granted in the original investigation and the expiry review.
Vendar se položaj vložnika v tem vmesnem pregledu razlikuje od položaja drugih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, za katere je bila prilagoditev odobrena v prvotni preiskavi in v pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa.
The adjustment made in the original investigation and in the expiry review specifically refers to exporting producers whose sales on the domestic market are carrying their own brand whereas sales to the Union are sold under retailer’s brand.
Prilagoditev iz prvotne preiskave in iz pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa se izrecno nanaša na proizvajalce izvoznike, katerih prodaja ima na domačem trgu lastno blagovno znamko, medtem ko se prodaja v Unijo prodaja pod blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno.
In this interim review, the applicant’s sales on both the domestic market and the Union market carry its own brand.
V okviru tega vmesnega pregleda poteka vložnikova prodaja na domačem trgu in na trgu Unije pod lastno blagovno znamko.
Moreover, the adjustments made in the original investigation and the expiry review were made to the profit margin when constructing the normal value in accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega so se prilagoditve iz prvotne preiskave in iz pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa nanašale na stopnjo dobička pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe.
However, in this interim review, the normal value is based on applicant’s actual domestic prices.
V okviru tega vmesnega pregleda pa normalna vrednost temelji na vložnikovih dejanskih domačih cenah.
Concerning the alleged lack of brand value when selling to the Union market, the importer of the product concerned carrying the applicant’s brand is specialised in imports of branded food products, in particular from Asia.
V zvezi z domnevnim pomanjkanjem vrednosti blagovne znamke pri prodaji na trg Unije je uvoznik zadevnega izdelka z blagovno znamko vložnika specializiran za uvoz izdelkov z blagovno znamko, zlasti iz Azije.
The applicant failed to clarify or provide evidence why sales to that particular importer would carry a lower value than the brand value on the applicant’s domestic market.
Vložnik ni pojasnil ali predložil dokazov, zakaj ima prodaja temu določenemu uvozniku nižjo vrednost od vrednosti blagovne znamke na vložnikovem domačem trgu.
Consequently, the Commission concluded that the applicant has not demonstrated that the alleged difference in brand value has an impact on prices or price comparability.
Zato je Komisija sklenila, da vložnik ni dokazal, da domnevna razlika v vrednosti blagovne znamke vpliva na cene ali primerljivost cen.
The applicant also claimed the same adjustment under Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation.
Vložnik je zahteval tudi enako prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe.
However, since the applicant has not demonstrated that the alleged difference has an impact on prices or price comparability, the allowance could not be accepted under this provision either.
Ker pa vložnik ni dokazal, da domnevne razlike vplivajo na cene ali primerljivost cen, prilagoditve ni bilo mogoče sprejeti niti na podlagi te določbe.
The claim for an allowance under Article 2(10)(d) and (k) is therefore rejected.
Zahtevek za prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(d) in členom 2(10)(k) se zato zavrne.
With reference to Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation, the applicant also claimed an allowance for a government-paid export tax rebate.
S sklicevanjem na člen 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe je vložnik zahteval tudi nadomestilo za državno znižanje izvoznih dajatev.
An amount is paid to the applicant by the government when the product concerned is sold for export, including to the Union market.
Vlada plača znesek vložniku, ko se zadevni izdelek proda za izvoz, vključno na trg Unije.
The applicant could demonstrate that an amount equivalent to less than 0,5 % of the invoice value is paid to the applicant for exports to the Union market.
Vložnik je lahko dokazal, da se mu za izvoz na trg Unije plača znesek, ki ustreza manj kot 0,5 % vrednosti na računu.