natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It also states that nothing in the III Code or RO Code shall be construed to restrict or limit in any way the fulfilment of Member States' obligations under the law of the Union in relation to the definition of ‘statutory certificates’ and ‘class certificates’, the scope of the obligations and criteria laid down for recognised organisations, and the duties of the European Commission as regards the recognition, assessment and, where appropriate, the imposition of corrective measures or sanctions on recognised organisations.
V priloženi izjavi je navedeno tudi, da se nič v kodeksu III ali RO ne razlaga kot kakršna koli omejitev izpolnjevanja obveznosti držav članic v skladu s pravom Evropske unije glede opredelitve „predpisanih spričeval“ in „klasifikacijskih spričeval“, področja uporabe obveznosti in meril, določenih za priznane organizacije, ter obveznosti Evropske komisije v zvezi s priznavanjem, ocenjevanjem priznanih organizacij in, če je ustrezno, naložitvijo popravnih ukrepov ali sankcij priznanim organizacijam.
The same declaration states that, in the case of an IMO audit, Member States will state that only compliance with those provisions of the relevant international conventions which Member States have accepted, including in the terms of this declaration, shall be verified.
V isti izjavi je navedeno še, da bodo države članice v primeru pregleda IMO navedle, da se mora preveriti skladnost z določbami ustreznih mednarodnih konvencij, ki so jih države članice sprejele, vključno s pogoji navedene izjave.
In the legal order of the Union, the scope of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 as well as that of Directive 2009/15/EC includes references to the ‘international conventions’ as described in recital 3.
V pravnem redu Unije področji uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009 in Direktive 2009/15/ES vključujeta sklice na „mednarodne konvencije“, kot so opisane v uvodni izjavi 3.
In this framework, amendments to IMO conventions are automatically brought into Union law at the same time when they enter into force at the international level, including the related codes of mandatory status such as the III and RO codes, which therefore form part of the IMO instruments relevant for the application of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009.
V tem okviru spremembe konvencij IMO samodejno postanejo del prava Unije, ko začnejo veljati na mednarodni ravni, vključno s pripadajočimi kodeksi obveznega značaja, kot sta kodeksa III in RO, ki sta torej del instrumentov IMO, pomembnih za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009.
Amendments to international conventions may however be excluded from the scope of Union maritime legislation in accordance with the conformity checking procedure if they meet at least one of the two criteria set out in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002.
Vendar se lahko spremembe mednarodnih konvencij v skladu s postopkom preverjanja skladnosti izključijo iz področja uporabe pomorske zakonodaje Unije, če izpolnjujejo vsaj enega od obeh meril iz člena 5(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2099/2002.
The Commission evaluated the amendments to the IMO conventions in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002 and determined that a number of discrepancies exist between, on the one hand, the III Code and the RO Code, and, on the other hand, Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 and Directive 2009/15/EC.
Komisija je proučila spremembe konvencij IMO v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 2099/2002 in ugotovila, da so med kodeksoma III in RO na eni strani ter Uredbo (ES) št. 391/2009 in Direktivo 2009/15/ES na drugi strani številna neskladja.
First, paragraph 16.1 of part 2 of the III Code provides for a minimum list of resources and processes which flag States have to establish, including the provision of administrative instructions pertaining, inter alia, to ship class certificates required by the flag State to demonstrate compliance with structural, mechanical, electrical, and/or other requirements of an international convention to which the flag State is a party or compliance with a requirement of the flag State's national regulation.
Prvič, točka 16.1 v delu 2 Kodeksa III določa minimalni seznam sredstev in postopkov, ki jih morajo zagotoviti države zastave, vključno z upravnimi navodili, ki se med drugim nanašajo na ladijska klasifikacijska spričevala, ki jih država zastave zahteva za dokazovanje skladnosti s konstrukcijskimi, mehanskimi, električnimi in/ali drugimi zahtevami mednarodne konvencije, katere pogodbenica je država zastave, ali z zahtevo nacionalne zakonodaje države zastave.
As detailed in recital (21) below however, Union law draws a distinction between statutory certificates and class certificates.
Vendar, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 21, pravo Unije razlikuje med predpisanimi in klasifikacijskimi spričevali.
Furthermore, when acting in its capacity as class society, a recognised organisation issues ship class certificates in accordance with its own rules, procedures, conditions and private contractual arrangements, to which the flag State is not a party.
Zato je ta določba Kodeksa III v nasprotju z razmejitvijo med klasifikacijskimi in predpisanimi dejavnostmi, kot so določene v veljavni zakonodaji EU.
Therefore, this provision of the III Code contradicts the delineation of class and statutory activities as set out in the existing EU legislation.
Drugič, točka 18.1 v delu 2 Kodeksa III zahteva, da država zastave „samo za ladje, ki so upravičene do plovbe pod njeno zastavo,“ preveri, ali ima priznana organizacija zadostne tehnične, upravljavske in raziskovalne zmogljivosti za opravljanje dodeljenih nalog.
Second, paragraph 18.1 of part 2 of the III Code requires the flag State to determine, ‘with regard only to ships entitled to fly its flag’, that a recognised organisation has adequate resources in terms of technical, managerial and research capabilities to accomplish the duties entrusted to it.
V nasprotju s tem je ta vidik v okviru prava Unije obravnavan kot zahteva za namene priznanja, kot je razvidno iz merila A.3 v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 391/2009, in v zvezi s celotnim ladjevjem, ki ga je klasificirala zadevna organizacija, brez razlikovanja na podlagi zastave.
In contrast, this aspect is addressed under Union law as a requirement for the purpose of the recognition as reflected in criterion A.3 in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009, and with regard to the entire fleet in the class of the organisation concerned, without distinction based on flag.
Če bi se navedena določba Kodeksa III vključila v pravo Unije, bi uporabo merila A.3 v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 391/2009 omejila na poslovanje priznane organizacije v zvezi z ladjami, ki plujejo pod zastavami držav članic, kar je v nasprotju s trenutno veljavnimi zahtevami.
Should the above provision of the III Code be incorporated into Union law, it would restrict the application of criterion A.3 in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 to the recognised organisation's performance with regard only to ships flying the flag of Member States, in contradiction with the requirements currently in force.
Tretjič, točka 19 v delu 2 Kodeksa III uvaja prepoved, po kateri država zastave svojih priznanih organizacij ne sme pooblastiti, da za ladje, ki niso upravičene do plovbe pod njeno zastavo, uporabljajo zahteve, ki se med drugim nanašajo na klasifikacijska pravila, zahteve ali postopke teh organizacij.
Third, paragraph 19 of part 2 of the III Code introduces a prohibition for a flag State to mandate its recognised organisations to apply to ships, other than those entitled to fly its flag, any requirements pertaining to, inter alia, their classification rules, requirements or procedures.
V skladu z Direktivo 2009/15/ES lahko države članice organizacijo pooblastijo, da v njihovem imenu izdaja predpisana spričevala njihovemu zadevnemu ladjevju, vendar samo, če je navedena organizacija priznana in se spremlja za ta namen v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 391/2009.
In this framework, the recognised organisations as such have to comply with certain requirements in their relevant activities across their classed fleet, irrespective of the flag.
To se nanaša na večino meril iz Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 391/2009, pa tudi na druge obveznosti, zlasti na člen 10(4) navedene uredbe.
This relates to most of the criteria set out in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009, as well as to other obligations, in particular Article 10(4) of that Regulation.
Če bi se navedena določba Kodeksa III vključila v pravo Unije, bi uporabo veljavnih zahtev glede priznanja iz Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009, med drugim če predstavljajo pravila, postopke in zahteve glede poslovanja priznane organizacije, omejila na poslovanje priznane organizacije v zvezi z ladjami, ki plujejo pod zastavami držav članic.
Should the above provision of the III Code be incorporated into Union law, it would restrict the application of the existing recognition requirements in Regulation (EC) No 391/2009, inter alia, if they qualify as rules, requirements and procedures to the recognised organisation's performance with regard only to ships flying the flag of Member States.
Četrtič, v oddelku 1.1 v delu 2 Kodeksa RO je „priznana organizacija“ opredeljena kot organizacija, ki jo je država zastave proučila in ugotovila, da izpolnjuje zahteve iz dela 2 Kodeksa RO.
Fourth, section 1.1 of part 2 of the RO Code defines a ‘Recognized Organization’ as an organisation assessed by a flag State, and found to comply with part 2 of the RO Code.
V nasprotju s tem člen 2(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009 določa, da priznana organizacija pomeni „organizacijo, priznano v skladu s to uredbo“.
In contrast, Article 2(e) of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 provides that a recognised organisation is ‘an organisation recognised in accordance with this Regulation’.
Na podlagi ocene Komisije iz uvodnih izjav od 21 do 23 se zdi, da je več določb v delu 2 Kodeksa RO nezdružljivih z Uredbo (ES) št. 391/2009.
Based on the Commission's evaluation set out in recitals (21) to (23), it appears that several provisions in part 2 of the RO Code are incompatible with Regulation (EC) No 391/2009.
Zato priznana organizacija, kot je opredeljena v Kodeksu RO, ne bi izpolnjevala vseh zahtev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009 in torej ne bi bila v skladu z opredelitvijo priznane organizacije, kot je določena v pravu Unije.
Consequently, a recognised organisation as defined in the RO Code would not fulfil all the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 and could therefore not meet the definition of a recognised organisation as set out in Union law.
Petič, v oddelku 1.3 v delu 2 Kodeksa RO je „izdajanje predpisanih spričeval in opravljanje storitev“ opredeljeno kot enotna kategorija dejavnosti, ki jih lahko priznana organizacija opravlja v imenu države zastave, vključno z izdajanjem spričeval, ki se nanašajo na zakonske in klasifikacijske zahteve.
Fifth, section 1.3 of part 2 of the RO Code defines ‘statutory certification and services’ as a single category of activities that a recognised organisation is entitled to perform on behalf of the flag State, including the issuance of certificates pertaining to both statutory and class requirements.
V nasprotju s tem opredelitvi v členu 2(g) in (i) Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009 jasno razlikujeta med „predpisanimi spričevali“, to so spričevala, ki jih izda država zastave ali so izdana v njenem imenu v skladu z mednarodnimi konvencijami, in „klasifikacijskimi spričevali“, to so dokumenti, ki jih izda priznana organizacija, ki deluje kot klasifikacijski zavod, in potrjujejo primernost ladje za določeno uporabo ali storitev v skladu s pravili in postopki, ki jih določi in objavi zadevna priznana organizacija.
In contrast, the definitions set out in Article 2(g) and (i) of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 draw a clear distinction between ‘statutory certificates’, which are those certificates issued by or on behalf of a flag State in accordance with the international conventions, and ‘class certificates’, which are those documents issued by a recognised organisation, in its capacity as class society, certifying the fitness of a ship for a particular use or service in accordance with the rules and procedures laid down and made public by that recognised organisation.
Iz tega sledi, da se predpisana in klasifikacijska spričevala v okviru prava Unije razlikujejo, tudi po naravi.
Namely, statutory certificates have a public nature, while class certificates have a private nature, being issued by the class society in accordance with its own rules, procedures and conditions.
Klasifikacijska spričevala, ki jih priznana organizacija izda za ladjo, da bi potrdila njeno skladnost s klasifikacijskimi pravili in postopki, vključno s spričevali, ki jih država zastave potrdi kot dokazilo o skladnosti s pravilom 3-1 v delu A-1 poglavja II-I konvencije SOLAS, so dokumenti povsem zasebne narave, ki niso niti akti države zastave niti niso izdani v imenu države zastave.
It follows that classification certificates issued by a recognised organisation for a ship in order to attest compliance with classification rules and procedures, including when verified by a flag State as proof of compliance with SOLAS Chapter II-I, Part A-1, Regulation 3-1, are documents of a strictly private nature which are neither acts of a flag State nor carried out on any flag State's behalf.
Vendar se „izdajanje predpisanih spričeval in opravljanje storitev“ v Kodeksu RO sistematično navaja kot dejavnost, ki jo priznana organizacija opravlja „v imenu države zastave“, kar je v nasprotju s pravnim razlikovanjem, določenim v pravu Unije.
In the RO Code however, ‘statutory certification and services’ are systematically referred to as being performed by the RO ‘on behalf of the flag State’, contradicting the legal distinction established in Union law.
Ne glede na to nasprotje bi ta določba Kodeksa RO, če bi bila sprejeta kot standard pravnega reda Unije, pomenila očitno tveganje, da zahtev glede priznanja iz Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009, ki se nanašajo na celotno dejavnost organizacije, ne glede na zastavo, v EU ne bi bilo več mogoče uveljavljati.
Notwithstanding this contradiction, this provision of the RO Code, if accepted as a norm in the Union legal order, entails a manifest risk that the recognition requirements contained in Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 which pertain to the entire activity of the organisation, irrespective of flag, could no longer be enforced within the EU.
V nasprotju s tem sodelovanje med priznanimi organizacijami v skladu s pravom Unije ureja člen 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009, ki od priznanih organizacij zahteva, da se med seboj posvetujejo, da bi ohranile enakovrednost ter si prizadevale za usklajenost svojih pravil in postopkov in njihovega izvajanja, in vzpostavlja okvir, na podlagi katerega se v ustreznih primerih vzajemno priznavajo klasifikacijska spričevala za materiale, opremo in sestavne dele.
In contrast, cooperation between recognised organisations under Union law is governed by Article10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009, which requires recognised organisations to consult with each other with a view to maintaining equivalence and aiming for harmonisation of their rules and procedures and the implementation thereof, and sets out a framework for the mutual recognition, in appropriate cases, of class certificates for materials, equipment and components.
Nič v kodeksu III ali RO ne bi smelo na noben način omejevati pristojnosti Unije, da v skladu s pogodbami in mednarodnim pravom določa ustrezne pogoje za podeljevanje priznanja organizacijam, ki želijo dobiti pooblastilo držav članic za opravljanje pregleda ladij in izdajo spričeval v njihovem imenu, z namenom, da se dosežejo cilji Unije, zlasti da se izboljšata pomorska varnost in varstvo okolja.
Those two cooperation processes under Article 10(1) pertain to the private activities of the recognised organisations, in their capacity as classification societies, and therefore apply without distinction based on flag.
Sistem za vzajemno priznavanje klasifikacijskih spričeval za materiale, opremo in sestavne dele, kot je določen s členom 10(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 391/2009, se lahko uveljavlja samo v Uniji v zvezi z ladjami, ki plujejo pod zastavo države članice.
The cooperation mechanisms provided for in the RO Code, if incorporated into Union law, would therefore limit the scope of the cooperation framework established by Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 to the recognised organisations' activities with regard only to ships flying the flag of Member States, in contradiction with the requirements currently in force.
Kar zadeva tuja plovila, lahko o sprejemanju zadevnih spričeval še naprej v okviru svoje izključne pristojnosti, zlasti na podlagi Konvencije Združenih narodov o pomorskem mednarodnem pravu (UNCLOS), po svoji presoji odločajo ustrezne države zastave, ki niso članice EU.
Nothing in either the III Code or the RO Code should place any restrictions on the Union's capacity to lay down, in accordance with the Treaties and international law, appropriate conditions for the granting of recognition to organisations wishing to be authorised by the Member States to carry out ship survey and certification activities on their behalf, with a view to achieving the Union's objectives and in particular to enhance maritime safety and the protection of the environment.
Ker Kodeks RO začne veljati 1. januarja 2015, bi ta uredba morala začeti veljati kar najhitreje po njeni objavi.
The scheme for the mutual recognition of class certificates for materials, equipment and components laid down by Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 is only enforceable within the Union in respect of ships flying the flag of a Member State.
Odbor za varnost na morju in preprečevanje onesnaževanja z ladij (COSS) ni podal mnenja o ukrepih iz te uredbe.
Based on its evaluation, the Commission determined that the provisions of the III Code and of the RO Code referred to in the preceding recitals are incompatible with Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 and should be excluded from the scope of that Regulation.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem odbora za pritožbe –
Therefore Article 2(b) of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009 should be amended accordingly.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
As the RO Code enters into force on 1 January 2015, this Regulation should enter into force as soon as possible after its date of publication.
Člen 1
The Committee on Safe Seas and the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (COSS) did not deliver an opinion on the measures provided for in this Regulation.
Točka (b) člena 2 Uredbe (ES) 391/2009 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
An implementing act was deemed to be necessary and the chair submitted the draft implementing act to the appeal committee for further deliberation.
‚mednarodne konvencije‘ pomenijo Mednarodno konvencijo z dne 1. novembra 1974 o varstvu človeškega življenja na morju (SOLAS 74), z izjemo poglavja XI-2 njene priloge, Mednarodno konvencijo z dne 5. aprila 1966 o tovornih črtah in Mednarodno konvencijo z dne 2. novembra 1973 o preprečevanju onesnaževanja morja z ladij (MARPOL), skupaj s protokoli in spremembami teh konvencij ter pripadajočimi kodeksi obveznega značaja v vseh državah članicah, in sicer v najnovejših različicah, razen točk 16.1, 18.1 in 19 dela 2 Kodeksa o izvajanju instrumentov IMO ter oddelkov 1.1, 1.3, 3.9.3.1, 3.9.3.2 in 3.9.3.3 dela 2 Kodeksa IMO o priznanih organizacijah.“
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the appeal committee,
Člen 2
Article 1
Uporablja se od 1. januarja 2015.
In Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 391/2009, point (b) is replaced by the following:
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
“international conventions” means the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1 November 1974 (SOLAS 74) with the exception of chapter XI-2 of the Annex thereto, the International Convention on Load Lines of 5 April 1966 and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 2 November 1973 (MARPOL), together with the protocols and amendments thereto, and the related codes of mandatory status in all Member States, with the exception of paragraphs 16.1, 18.1 and 19 of part 2 of the IMO Instruments Implementation Code, and of sections 1.1, 1.3, 3.9.3.1, 3.9.3.2 and 3.9.3.3 of part 2 of the IMO Code for Recognized Organizations, in their up-to-date version.’
V Bruslju, 17. decembra 2014
It shall apply from 1 January 2015.
UL L 131, 28.5.2009, str. 11.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
UL L 324, 29.11.2002, str. 1.
Done at Brussels, 17 December 2014.
Direktiva 2009/15/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o skupnih pravilih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za tehnični nadzor in pregled ladij, ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav (UL L 131, 28.5.2009, str. 47).
For the Commission
Sklep Sveta z dne 13. maja 2013 o stališču, ki se sprejme v imenu Evropske unije v okviru Mednarodne pomorske organizacije (IMO) v zvezi s sprejetjem določenih kodeksov in povezanih sprememb določenih konvencij in protokolov (UL L 155, 7.6.2013, str.
OJ L 131, 28.5.2009, p. 11.
Šestič, oddelek 3.9.3.1 v delu 2 Kodeksa RO opredeljuje mehanizem sodelovanja med priznanimi organizacijami v enotnem okviru, ki ga vzpostavi država zastave, s ciljem standardizirati postopke v zvezi z izdajanjem predpisanih spričeval in opravljanjem storitev za državo zastave, če je to primerno, oddelek 3.9.3.2 v delu 2 istega kodeksa pa določa, da se v okviru, ki ga vzpostavi država zastave ali „skupina držav zastave“, ureja sodelovanje med priznanimi organizacijami teh držav na področju tehničnih in varnostnih vidikov „izdajanja predpisanih spričeval in opravljanja storitev ladij […] v imenu navedenih držav zastave“.
OJ L 324, 29.11.2002, p. 1.
Sedmič, oddelek 3.9.3.3 v delu 2 Kodeksa RO je popolnoma enak točki 19 v delu 2 Kodeksa III, zato se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 19 v enaki meri nanašajo tudi na to določbo Kodeksa RO.
Directive 2009/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administration (OJ L 131, 28.5.2009, p. 47).
Ta določba Kodeksa III se pravzaprav nanaša na pravilo 3-1 v delu A-1 poglavja II-1 konvencije SOLAS, ki določa, da morajo biti ladje zasnovane, grajene in vzdrževane v skladu s konstrukcijskimi, mehanskimi in električnimi zahtevami klasifikacijskega zavoda, ki ga je uprava priznala v skladu z določbami pravila XI-1/1.1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1356/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1356/2014
amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1484/95 v zvezi z določitvijo reprezentativnih cen v sektorjih perutninskega mesa in jajc ter za albumine iz jajc
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 [1], and in particular Article 183(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trgov kmetijskih proizvodov in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 922/72, (EGS) št. 234/79, (ES) št. 1037/2001 in (ES) št. 1234/2007 [1], zlasti člena183(b) Uredbe,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 510/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 1216/2009 and (EC) No 614/2009 [2], and in particular Article 5(6)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. aprila 2014 o trgovinskih režimih za nekatero blago, pridobljeno s predelavo kmetijskih proizvodov, in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (ES) št. 1216/2009 in (ES) št. 614/2009 [2], zlasti člena 5(6)(a) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 should be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1484/95 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.