natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Directive 93/7/EEC provided that return proceedings may not be brought more than 30 years after the object was unlawfully removed from the territory of the Member State.
Vendar v primeru predmetov, ki so del javnih zbirk, in predmetov, ki so del inventarja cerkvenih institucij v državah članicah, v katerih po nacionalnem pravu zanje velja posebna varstvena ureditev, za postopek za vračilo pod določenimi pogoji velja daljši rok.
However, in the case of objects forming part of public collections and of objects belonging to inventories of ecclesiastical institutions in the Member States where they are subject to special protection arrangements under national law, return proceedings are subject to a longer time-limit under certain circumstances.
Ker se lahko države članice na podlagi nacionalnega prava z verskimi ustanovami, ki niso cerkvene, dogovorijo o posebni varstveni ureditvi, bi se moralo področje uporabe te direktive razširiti tudi na te druge verske ustanove.
Due to the fact that Member States may have special protection arrangements under national law with religious institutions other than ecclesiastical ones, this Directive should also extend to those other religious institutions.
Svet je v svojih Sklepih o preprečevanju kaznivih dejanj v zvezi s predmeti kulturne dediščine in boju proti njim, sprejetih 13. in 14. decembra 2011, priznal, da je treba sprejeti ukrepe za učinkovitejše preprečevanje in zatiranje kaznivih dejanj v zvezi s predmeti kulturne dediščine.
In its Conclusions on preventing and combating crime against cultural goods adopted on 13 and 14 December 2011, the Council recognised the need to take measures in order to make preventing and combating crime concerning cultural objects more effective.
Komisiji je priporočil, naj podpre države članice pri učinkovitem varstvu predmetov kulturne dediščine, da se preprečuje in zatira nezakonita trgovina z njimi ter po potrebi spodbudijo dopolnilni ukrepi.
It recommended that the Commission support Member States in the effective protection of cultural objects with a view to preventing and combating trafficking and promoting complementary measures where appropriate.
Poleg tega je državam članicam priporočil, naj razmislijo o ratifikaciji Konvencije Unesca o sredstvih za prepoved in preprečevanje nezakonitega uvoza, izvoza in prenosa lastništva kulturnih dobrin, podpisane v Parizu 17. novembra 1970, ter Konvencije UNIDROIT o ukradenih ali nezakonito izvoženih predmetih kulturne dediščine, podpisane v Rimu 24. junija 1995.
In addition, the Council recommended that the Member States consider the ratification of the Unesco Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property signed in Paris on 17 November 1970, and the UNIDROIT Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects signed in Rome on 24 June 1995.
Zato bi bilo zaželeno zagotoviti, da vsi akterji na trgu pri trgovanju s predmeti kulturne dediščine ravnajo skrbno.
It is desirable to ensure that all those involved in the market exercise due care and attention in transactions involving cultural objects.
Posledice pridobitve predmeta kulturne dediščine nezakonitega izvora bodo resnično odvračilne samo, če bo plačilo nadomestila spremljala obveznost za lastnika predmeta, da dokaže, da je ravnal z dolžno skrbnostjo.
The consequences of acquiring a cultural object of unlawful origin will only be genuinely dissuasive if the payment of compensation is coupled with an obligation on the possessor to prove the exercise of due care and attention.
Da bi dosegli cilje Unije glede preprečevanja nezakonite trgovine s predmeti kulturne dediščine in boja proti njej, bi morala ta direktiva zato določati, da mora lastnik za namene odškodnine predložiti dokazilo, da je pri pridobitvi predmeta ravnal z dolžno skrbnostjo.
Therefore, in order to achieve the Union ' s objectives of preventing and combating unlawful trafficking in cultural objects, this Directive should stipulate that the possessor must provide proof that he exercised due care and attention in acquiring the object, for the purpose of compensation.
Za vse osebe, zlasti za akterje na trgu, bi bilo koristno, da bi lahko enostavno dostopali do javnih informacij o predmetih kulturne dediščine, ki so jih države članice uvrstile v nacionalno bogastvo ali jih tako opredelile.
It would also be useful for any person, and in particular those who are involved in the market, to have easy access to public information on cultural objects classified or defined as national treasures by the Member States.
Države članice bi si morale prizadevati, da se olajša dostop do teh javnih informacij.
Member States should try to facilitate access to this public information.
Da bi olajšali enotno razlago pojma dolžne skrbnosti, bi bilo treba v tej direktivi opredeliti neizčrpen seznam meril, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri odločanju, ali je lastnik pri pridobitvi predmeta kulturne dediščine ravnal z dolžno skrbnostjo.
In order to facilitate a uniform interpretation of the concept of due care and attention, this Directive should set out non-exhaustive criteria to be taken into account to determine whether the possessor exercised due care and attention when acquiring the cultural object.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer omogočiti vračilo predmetov kulturne dediščine, uvrščenih v nacionalno bogastvo ali tako opredeljenih, ki so bili protipravno odstranjeni z ozemlja držav članic, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi svojega obsega in učinkov lažje doseže na ravni Unij e, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to enable the return of cultural objects classified or defined as national treasures which have been unlawfully removed from the territory of Member States, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenega cilja.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
Ker so naloge Odbora, ustanovljenega z Uredbo (ES) št. 116/2009, zaradi črtanja Priloge k Direktivi 93/7/EGS postale brezpredmetne, bi bilo treba sklice na navedeni odbor črtati.
Since the tasks of the committee set up by Regulation (EC) No 116/2009 are rendered obsolete by the deletion of the Annex to Directive 93/7/EEC, references to that committee should be deleted accordingly.
Da pa bi ohranili forum za izmenjavo izkušenj in dobrih praks v zvezi z izvajanjem te direktive med državami članicami, bi morala Komisija ustanoviti skupino izvedencev, sestavljeno iz strokovnjakov iz osrednjih organov držav članic, pristojnih za izvajanje te direktive, ki bi morala med drugim sodelovati v postopku vzpostavljanja modula sistema IMI za predmete kulturne dediščine.
However, in order to maintain the platform for the exchange of experience and good practices on the implementation of this Directive among Member States, the Commission should set up an expert group, composed of experts from the Member States ' central authorities responsible for the implementation of this Directive, which should be involved, inter alia, in the process of customising a module of the IMI system for cultural objects.
Ker Priloga k Uredbi (EU) št. 1024/2012 vsebuje seznam določb o upravnem sodelovanju iz aktov Unije, ki se izvajajo prek sistema IMI, bi bilo treba navedeno prilogo spremeniti z vključitvijo te direktive.
Since the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 contains a list of provisions on administrative cooperation in Union acts which are implemented by means of the IMI, that Annex should be amended to include this Directive.
Obveznost prenosa te direktive v nacionalno pravo bi morala biti omejena na tiste določbe, ki pomenijo vsebinsko spremembo glede na predhodne direktive.
The obligation to transpose this Directive into national law should be confined to those provisions which represent a substantive amendment as compared to the earlier Directives.
Obveznost prenosa nespremenjenih določb je določena s prejšnjimi direktivami.
The obligation to transpose the provisions which are unchanged arises from the earlier Directives.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v obveznosti držav članic glede rokov iz dela B Priloge I za prenos direktiv v nacionalno pravo –
This Directive should be without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time-limits for the transposition into national law of the Directives set out in Annex I, Part B,
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO DIREKTIVO:
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Člen 1
Article 1
Ta direktiva se uporablja za vračilo predmetov kulturne dediščine, ki jih država članica uvrsti v nacionalno bogastvo iz točke 1 člena 2 ali jih tako opredeli in so bili protipravno odstranjeni z ozemlja te države članice.
This Directive applies to the return of cultural objects classified or defined by a Member State as being among national treasures, as referred to in point (1) of Article 2, which have been unlawfully removed from the territory of that Member State.
Člen 2
Article 2
V tej direktivi se uporabljajo naslednje opredelitve:
For the purposes of this Directive, the following definitions apply:
„predmet kulturne dediščine“ pomeni predmet, ki ga je država članica pred njegovo protipravno odstranitvijo z ozemlja te države članice ali po njej uvrstila v „nacionalno bogastvo z umetniško, zgodovinsko ali arheološko vrednostjo“ ali ga tako opredelila po nacionalni zakonodaji ali upravnih postopkih v smislu člena 36 PDEU;
‘cultural object’ means an object which is classified or defined by a Member State, before or after its unlawful removal from the territory of that Member State, as being among the ‘national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value’ under national legislation or administrative procedures within the meaning of Article 36 TFEU;
„protipravno odstranjen z ozemlja države članice“ pomeni:
‘unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State’ means:
odstranjen z ozemlja države članice, pri čemer so kršeni njeni predpisi o varstvu nacionalnega bogastva ali Uredba (ES) št. 116/2009, ali
removed from the territory of a Member State in breach of its rules on the protection of national treasures or in breach of Regulation (EC) No 116/2009; or
ni bil vrnjen ob koncu obdobja zakonite začasne odstranitve, ali pa kakršno koli kršitev drugih pogojev, ki urejajo tako začasno odstranitev;
not returned at the end of a period of lawful temporary removal or any breach of another condition governing such temporary removal;
„država članica, ki zahteva vračilo“ pomeni državo članico, z ozemlja katere je bil predmet kulturne dediščine protipravno odstranjen;
‘requesting Member State’ means the Member State from whose territory the cultural object has been unlawfully removed;
„država članica, od katere se zahteva vračilo“ pomeni državo članico, na ozemlju katere se nahaja predmet kulturne dediščine, ki je bil protipravno odstranjen z ozemlja druge države članice;
‘requested Member State’ means the Member State in whose territory a cultural object, which was unlawfully removed from the territory of another Member State, is located;
„vračilo“ pomeni fizično vračilo predmeta kulturne dediščine na ozemlje države članice, ki zahteva vračilo;
‘return’ means the physical return of the cultural object to the territory of the requesting Member State;
„lastnik“ pomeni osebo, ki fizično poseduje predmet kulturne dediščine v svojem imenu;
‘possessor’ means the person physically holding the cultural object on his own account;
„imetnik“ pomeni osebo, ki fizično poseduje predmet kulturne dediščine za tretje stranke;
‘holder’ means the person physically holding the cultural object for third parties;
„javne zbirke“ pomeni zbirke, ki so v skladu z zakonodajo države članice opredeljene kot javne in so v lasti zadevne države članice, lokalnega ali regionalnega organa države članice ali ustanove na ozemlju države članice, če je taka ustanova last te države članice ali lokalnega ali regionalnega organa ali pa jo ta država članica ali organ v večji meri financira.
‘public collections’ means collections, defined as public in accordance with the legislation of a Member State, which are the property of that Member State, of a local or regional authority within that Member State or of an institution situated in the territory of that Member State, such institution being the property of, or significantly financed by, that Member State or local or regional authority.
Člen 3
Article 3
Predmeti kulturne dediščine, ki so bili protipravno odstranjeni z ozemlja države članice, se vrnejo v skladu s postopkom in v okoliščinah, določenimi v tej direktivi.
Cultural objects which have been unlawfully removed from the territory of a Member State shall be returned in accordance with the procedure and in the circumstances provided for in this Directive.
Člen 4
Article 4
Vsaka država članica imenuje enega ali več osrednjih organov za izvajanje nalog, določenih s to direktivo.
Each Member State shall appoint one or more central authorities to carry out the tasks provided for in this Directive.
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo o vseh osrednjih organih, ki so jih imenovale v skladu s tem členom.
Member States shall inform the Commission of all the central authorities they appoint pursuant to this Article.
Komisija seznam teh osrednjih organov in morebitnih sprememb v zvezi z njimi objavi v seriji C Uradnega lista Evropske unije.
The Commission shall publish a list of those central authorities and any changes concerning them in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union.
Člen 5
Article 5
Osrednji organi držav članic sodelujejo med seboj in pospešujejo posvetovanje med pristojnimi državnimi organi držav članic.
Member States ' central authorities shall cooperate and promote consultation between the Member States ' competent national authorities.
Ti organi zlasti:
The latter shall in particular:
Vloga mora vsebovati vse informacije, potrebne za lažje iskanje, zlasti informacije o dejanski ali domnevni lokaciji predmeta;
The application must include all information needed to facilitate the search, with particular reference to the actual or presumed location of the object;
Če preverjanje ni opravljeno v predpisanem roku, se točki 4 in 5 ne uporabljata več;
notify the Member States concerned, where a cultural object is found in their own territory and there are reasonable grounds for believing that it has been unlawfully removed from the territory of another Member State;
v sodelovanju z zadevno državo članico izvedejo kakršne koli ukrepe, potrebne za fizično zaščito predmeta kulturne dediščine;
If it is not made within the stipulated period, points (4) and (5) shall cease to apply;
v zvezi z vračilom nastopajo kot posrednik med lastnikom in/ali imetnikom ter državo članico, ki zahteva vračilo.
take any necessary measures, in cooperation with the Member State concerned, for the physical preservation of the cultural object;
V ta namen lahko pristojni organi države članice, od katere se zahteva vračilo, brez poseganja v člen 6 olajšajo potek arbitražnega postopka v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo države članice, od katere se zahteva vračilo, če država članica, ki zahteva vračilo, ter lastnik ali imetnik to uradno odobrita.
prevent, by the necessary interim measures, any action to evade the return procedure;
Osrednji organi držav članic za sodelovanje in medsebojno posvetovanje uporabljajo modul informacijskega sistema za notranji trg (v nadaljnjem besedilu: IMI), vzpostavljen z Uredbo (EU) št. 1024/2012, ki je posebej prilagojen predmetom kulturne dediščine.
act as intermediary between the possessor and/or holder and the requesting Member State with regard to return.
Sistem IMI lahko uporabljajo tudi za razširjanje zadevnih informacij v zvezi s primeri predmetov kulturne dediščine, ki so bili ukradeni ali protipravno odstranjeni z njihovega ozemlja.
To that end, the competent authorities of the requested Member State may, without prejudice to Article 6, first facilitate the implementation of an arbitration procedure, in accordance with the national legislation of the requested Member State and provided that the requesting Member State and the possessor or holder give their formal approval.
Države članice odločijo, ali drugi pristojni organi uporabljajo sistem IMI za namene te direktive.
In order to cooperate and consult with each other, the central authorities of the Member States shall use a module of the Internal Market Information System (‘IMI’) established by Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 specifically customised for cultural objects.
Člen 6
They may also use the IMI to disseminate relevant case-related information concerning cultural objects which have been stolen or unlawfully removed from their territory.
Država članica, ki zahteva vračilo, lahko pred pristojnim sodiščem v državi članici, od katere se zahteva vračilo, proti lastniku ali, če tega ni, proti imetniku sproži postopek za vračilo predmeta kulturne dediščine, ki je bil protipravno odstranjen z njenega ozemlja.
The Member States shall decide on the use of the IMI by other competent authorities for the purposes of this Directive.
Postopek se lahko sproži samo, če sta dokumentu za sprožitev postopka priložena:
Article 6
dokument, v katerem je opisan predmet, ki je predmet zahteve, in v katerem je navedeno, da je to predmet kulturne dediščine;
The requesting Member State may initiate, before the competent court in the requested Member State, proceedings against the possessor or, failing him, the holder, with the aim of securing the return of a cultural object which has been unlawfully removed from its territory.
izjava pristojnih organov države članice, ki zahteva vračilo, da je bil predmet kulturne dediščine protipravno odstranjen z njenega ozemlja.
Proceedings may be brought only where the document initiating them is accompanied by:
Člen 7
a document describing the object covered by the request and stating that it is a cultural object;
Pristojni osrednji organ države članice, ki zahteva vračilo, nemudoma obvesti pristojni osrednji organ države članice, od katere se zahteva vračilo, da je bil sprožen postopek za vračilo zadevnega predmeta.
a declaration by the competent authorities of the requesting Member State that the cultural object has been unlawfully removed from its territory.
Pristojni osrednji organ države članice, od katere se zahteva vračilo, nemudoma obvesti osrednje organe drugih držav članic.
Article 7
Izmenjava informacij poteka prek sistema IMI v skladu z veljavnimi pravnimi določbami o varstvu osebnih podatkov in zasebnosti, kar ne posega v možnost pristojnih osrednjih organov, da poleg sistema IMI uporabljajo druga komunikacijska sredstva.
The competent central authority of the requesting Member State shall forthwith inform the competent central authority of the requested Member State that proceedings have been initiated with the aim of securing the return of the object in question.
Člen 8
The competent central authority of the requested Member State shall forthwith inform the central authorities of the other Member States.
Države članice v svoji zakonodaji določijo, da se postopek za vračilo na podlagi te direktive lahko sproži tri leta po datumu, ko pristojni osrednji organ države članice, ki zahteva vračilo, izve za lokacijo predmeta kulturne dediščine in identiteto njegovega lastnika ali imetnika.
The exchange of information shall be conducted using the IMI in accordance with the applicable legal provisions on the protection of personal data and privacy, without prejudice to the possibility for the competent central authorities to use other means of communication in addition to the IMI.
Takšen postopek se v nobenem primeru ne sme sprožiti več kot 30 let po datumu, ko je bil predmet protipravno odstranjen z ozemlja države članice, ki zahteva vračilo.
Article 8
Vendar pa v primeru predmetov, ki so del javnih zbirk, opredeljenih v točki 8 člena 2, in predmetov, ki spadajo v inventar cerkvenih ali drugih verskih ustanov v državah članicah, kjer je ta dediščina po nacionalnem pravu pod posebnim varstvenim režimom, za postopek za vračilo velja časovna omejitev 75 let, razen v državah članicah, kjer za postopke ni časovnih omejitev, ali v primeru dvostranskih sporazumov med državami članicami, ki določajo obdobje, ki presega 75 let.
Member States shall provide in their legislation that return proceedings under this Directive may not be brought more than three years after the competent central authority of the requesting Member State became aware of the location of the cultural object and of the identity of its possessor or holder.
Postopek za vračilo ni dopusten, če odstranitev predmeta kulturne dediščine z ozemlja države članice, ki zahteva vračilo, ni več protipravna v trenutku, ko naj bi se postopek začel.
Such proceedings may, in any event, not be brought more than 30 years after the object was unlawfully removed from the territory of the requesting Member State.
Člen 9
However, in the case of objects forming part of public collections, defined in point (8) of Article 2, and objects belonging to inventories of ecclesiastical or other religious institutions in the Member States where they are subject to special protection arrangements under national law, return proceedings shall be subject to a time-limit of 75 years, except in Member States where proceedings are not subject to a time-limit or in the case of bilateral agreements between Member States providing for a period exceeding 75 years.
Pristojno sodišče odredi vračilo zadevnega predmeta kulturne dediščine, kadar ugotovi, da gre za predmet kulturne dediščine v smislu točke 1 člena 2 in da je bil ta protipravno odstranjen z državnega ozemlja, razen če ni v členih 8 in 14 določeno drugače.
Return proceedings may not be brought if removal of the cultural object from the national territory of the requesting Member State is no longer unlawful at the time when they are to be initiated.
Člen 10
Article 9
Kadar se odredi vračilo predmeta, pristojno sodišče države članice, od katere se zahteva vračilo, lastniku prisodi pošteno nadomestilo glede na okoliščine primera, pod pogojem, da lastnik dokaže, da je pri pridobitvi predmeta ravnal z dolžno skrbnostjo.
Save as otherwise provided in Articles 8 and 14, the competent court shall order the return of the cultural object in question where it is found to be a cultural object within the meaning of point (1) of Article 2 and to have been removed unlawfully from national territory.
V primeru donacije ali nasledstva lastnik ni v ugodnejšem položaju od osebe, od katere je na ta način predmet pridobil.
Article 10
Država članica, ki zahteva vračilo, to nadomestilo plača po vračilu predmeta.
Where return of the object is ordered, the competent court in the requested Member State shall award the possessor fair compensation according to the circumstances of the case, provided that the possessor demonstrates that he exercised due care and attention in acquiring the object.
Člen 11
In the case of a donation or succession, the possessor shall not be in a more favourable position than the person from whom he acquired the object by those means.
Enako velja za stroške ukrepov, navedenih v točki 4 člena 5.
The requesting Member State shall pay that compensation upon return of the object.
Člen 12
Article 11
Plačilo poštenega nadomestila in stroškov iz členov 10 oziroma 11 ne posega v pravico države članice, ki zahteva vračilo, da zahteva povračilo teh zneskov od oseb, odgovornih za protipravno odstranitev predmetov kulturne dediščine z njenega ozemlja.
Expenses incurred in implementing a decision ordering the return of a cultural object shall be borne by the requesting Member State.
Člen 13
The same applies to the costs of the measures referred to in point (4) of Article 5.
Lastninska pravica na predmetu kulturne dediščine se po vračilu presoja po pravu države članice, ki zahteva vračilo.
Article 12
Člen 14