natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, the amounts of double-counted biodiesel available on the Union market were limited in relation to the total sales of biodiesel during the period under investigation.
Vendar pa so bile količine biodizla, upravičenega do dvojnega štetja, ki je bil na voljo na trgu Unije, omejene v primerjavi s celotno prodajo biodizla v preiskovanem obdobju.
Also, should a Member State have double-counting in force, the biodiesel that complies to be counted as double-counted is produced in the Union and therefore demand remains within the Union industry.
Poleg tega je tudi v primeru države članice, kjer velja dvojno štetje, biodizel, ki je upravičen do dvojnega štetja, proizveden v Uniji, zato povpraševanje ostaja v okviru industrije Unije.
No new evidence was provided that would change this conclusion.
Predložen ni bil noben nov dokaz, na podlagi katerega bi se ta sklep spremenil.
In the absence of any new comments concerning regulatory factors, recitals 143 to 146 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih novih pripomb v zvezi z regulativnimi dejavniki, se uvodne izjave 143 do 146 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Recitals 147 to 153 of the provisional Regulation address allegations by interested parties that restrictions in Member States, such as quota systems and tax regimes, were designed to restrict imports from the countries concerned, meaning that any injury caused to the Union industry, in particular in some Member States, could not be due to imports.
V uvodnih izjavah 147 do 153 začasne uredbe so obravnavane trditve zainteresiranih strani, da je namen omejitev v državah članicah, kot so sistemi kvot in davčni sistemi, omejevanje uvoza iz zadevnih držav, kar pomeni, da uvoz ni mogel povzročiti nobene škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, zlasti v nekaterih državah članicah.
These arguments were provisionally rejected, among other things because dumped imports from countries concerned are present in most Member States.
Te trditve so bile začasno zavrnjene, med drugim zato, ker je dampinški uvoz iz zadevnih držav prisoten v večini držav članic.
Besides, after being imported to one Member State, these imports could be transported and sold in other Member States as well.
Poleg tega bi se lahko ta uvoz, potem ko je bil uvožen v eno državo članico, prepeljal tudi v druge države članice in se tam prodajal.
One interested party noted the small amount of Argentinian biodiesel cleared through French customs controls in 2011, and also the small amount declared as being imported into Germany in the same period.
Ena zainteresirana stran je opozorila na to, da sta bili količina biodizla iz Argentine, carinjena v Franciji leta 2011, in količina, ki je bila v istem obdobju prijavljena kot uvožena v Nemčijo, majhni.
Firstly, as explained above, biodiesel cleared through customs in one Member State may well be sold in another Member State, making such data unreliable.
Prvič, kot je pojasnjeno zgoraj, je mogoče biodizel, carinjen v eni državi članici, prodati v drugi državi članici, zaradi česar so ti podatki nezanesljivi.
Second, the sampled companies in France and Germany both were able to demonstrate the price competition between their production and imports from the countries concerned, and the injury that they were suffering as a result.
Poleg tega so lahko vzorčene družbe iz Francije in Nemčije dokazale konkurenčnost cen med njihovo proizvodnjo in uvozom iz zadevnih držav ter škodo, ki jim jo ta povzroča.
Another interested party claimed that the withdrawal of schemes designed to benefit the biodiesel industry in many Member States lowered the revenue of biodiesel companies during the period considered, thus leading to injury.
Druga zainteresirana stran je trdila, da se je z odpravo shem, ki so zagotavljale koristi industriji biodizla v mnogih državah članicah, v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal prihodek podjetij na področju industrije biodizla, zaradi česar so ta utrpela škodo.
They point to in particular the gradual withdrawal of tax incentives in France, and taxes on ‘green fuels’ in Germany.
Izpostavlja zlasti postopno odpravo davčnih spodbud v Franciji in davkov na „zelena goriva“ v Nemčiji.
However, there is no obvious coincidence in time between these changes and the deterioration in the financial performance of the Union industry.
Vendar ni očitnega časovnega sovpadanja teh sprememb in poslabšanja finančne uspešnosti industrije Unije.
Many of these incentives were directed at users of biodiesel, not manufacturers, and most were still in force during the IP.
Veliko teh spodbud je bilo usmerjenih v uporabnike biodizla, ne v proizvajalce, in večina se je še vedno izvajala v OP.
No evidence has been provided to show that the changes in policy of Member States, moving as they have to mandatory blending requirements, has caused injury to the Union industry.
Predloženi niso bili nobeni dokazi, da je sprememba politike držav članic, tj. prehod na obvezne zahteve v zvezi z mešanjem biodizla, povzročila škodo industriji Unije.
One Indonesian exporting producer noted the ongoing DG Competition investigation into alleged submission of distorted prices by contributors to Platts oil and biofuels products assessed prices and requested that the subject this investigation be considered as a possible cause of injury.
Eden od indonezijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je opozoril na tekočo preiskavo GD za konkurenco o izkrivljenih cenah, ki so jih domnevno predložili subjekti, ki so prispevali k oceni cen agencije Platts za izdelke iz nafte in biogoriv, ter zahteval, da se predmet te preiskave obravnava kot morebiten vzrok škode.
This claim was denied as the investigation is ongoing and no findings have been published.
Ta zahtevek je bil zavrnjen, ker je preiskava v teku, ugotovitve pa niso bile objavljene.
In the absence of any new comments as regards the policies of Member States, recitals 147 to 153 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih novih pripomb glede politik držav članic, se uvodne izjave 147 do 153 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Imports of product concerned from the countries concerned were dumped during the IP and undercut the sales of the Union industry.
Uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz zadevnih držav v OP je bil dampinški in je nelojalno nižal cene prodaje industrije Unije.
There is a clear coincidence in time between the increasing volumes of dumped imports and the deterioration of the situation of the Union industry.
Povečan obseg dampinškega uvoza jasno časovno sovpada s poslabšanjem položaja industrije Unije.
The dumped imports were in direct competition with the Union industry’s production and as a result the Union industry lost profitability and market share during the period under consideration.
Dampinški uvoz je neposredno konkuriral proizvodnji industrije Unije, zato je industrija Unije v obravnavanem obdobju izgubila dobičkonosnost in tržni delež.
Whereas it is possible that other factors mentioned above have affected the performance of the Union industry to a certain extent, the fact remains that dumped imports from the countries concerned are causing injury to the Union industry.
Dejstvo je, da dampinški uvoz iz zadevnih držav povzroča škodo industriji Unije, čeprav je možno, da so na uspešnost industrije Unije v določenem obsegu vplivali tudi drugi zgoraj navedeni dejavniki.
No new evidence was provided to change that conclusion that the effect of other factors, considered individually or collectively, was not such as to break the causal link between the dumped imports and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Predloženi niso bili nobeni novi dokazi, na podlagi katerih bi se spremenil sklep, v skladu s katerim učinek drugih dejavnikov ni bil tolikšen, da bi prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, ne glede na to ali se obravnava učinek posameznega dejavnika ali več dejavnikov skupaj.
In the absence of any other comments regarding the conclusion on causation, recitals 154 to 157 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s sklepom o vzročni zvezi ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave od 154 do 157 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments regarding the interest of the Union industry, recitals 159 to 161 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi z interesom industrije Unije, se uvodne izjave 159 do 161 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One Indonesian exporting producer alleged that the proposed duties would have a negative impact on importers and traders, but provided no evidence for their allegation.
En indonezijski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bodo predlagane dajatve negativno vplivale na uvoznike in trgovce, vendar te trditve ni podprl z nobenimi dokazi.
In fact their claim stated the opposite, which was that the duty could be passed on to users and consumers in higher prices which would presumably lead in fact to no impact whatsoever on importers and traders.
Njegova navedba, da bi se lahko dajatev prenesla na uporabnike in potrošnike z zvišanjem cen, je dejansko dokazovala nasprotno, tj. da dajatev najverjetneje ne bo imela nobenega vpliva na uvoznike in trgovce.
No comments were received from any importers or traders of biodiesel after the publication of provisional measures.
Po objavi začasnih ukrepov noben uvoznik ali trgovec z biodizlom ni predložil nobenih pripomb.
In the absence of any additional new comments as regards the interest of unrelated importers/traders, recitals 162 to 163 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z interesom nepovezanih uvoznikov/trgovcev ni bilo novih pripomb, se uvodni izjavi 162 in 163 začasne uredbe potrdita.
One Indonesian exporting producer alleged that the proposed duties would increase the price of biodiesel, and therefore reduce the incentive for consumers to buy vehicles that operate on biofuels.
En indonezijski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da se bo zaradi predlaganih dajatev zvišala cena biodizla, zaradi česar bodo potrošniki manj motivirani za nakup vozil, ki jih poganjajo biogoriva.
That allegation is rejected.
Ta trditev se zavrne.
The main application of biodiesel is to be blended into mineral diesel for sale to consumers, so that they do not need to buy a special vehicle that can run on pure biofuels.
Biodizel je namenjen predvsem mešanju z mineralnim dizlom za prodajo potrošnikom, da tem ne bi bilo treba kupovati posebnih vozil, ki jih poganjajo čista biogoriva.
Although the price of the biodiesel element would rise, if that biodiesel was imported from Argentina or Indonesia, as stated in the provisional Regulation, given that the proportion of biodiesel in the diesel sold to consumers is small, the increase in price is also small and not noticeable to the consumer.
Čeprav bi se cena biodizla v primeru uvoza iz Argentine ali Indonezije zvišala, kot je navedeno v začasni uredbi, bi bilo zvišanje cene glede na majhen delež biodizla v dizlu, ki se prodaja potrošnikom, prav tako majhno in za potrošnika zanemarljivo.
The possible effect of the measures on the final price of diesel to the consumer, which are expected to be small as set out above, will not undermine the objectives of the Renewable Energy Directive (‘RED’).
Morebitni učinek ukrepov na končno ceno dizla za potrošnike, pri čemer bodo imeli ti ukrepi po pričakovanjih omejen učinek, kakor je navedeno zgoraj, ne bo ogrozil ciljev direktive o obnovljivih virih.
No users or consumers, or groups or associations representing users or consumers, commented on the provisional Regulation.
Nobeni uporabniki ali potrošniki in skupine ali združenja, ki predstavljajo uporabnike ali potrošnike, niso predložili pripomb v zvezi z začasno uredbo.
In the absence of any additional comments regarding the interest of consumers, recitals 164 to 166 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi z interesom potrošnikov ni bilo dodatnih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 164 do 166 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments regarding the interest of raw material suppliers, recitals 167 to 169 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb v zvezi z interesom dobaviteljev surovin, se uvodne izjave 167 do 169 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
No comments were received that would change the analysis of the Union interest as set out in the provisional Regulation, and therefore it is still in the Union interest that measures be imposed.
Prejete niso bile nobene pripombe, na podlagi katerih bi se spremenila analiza interesa Unije, kot je navedena v začasni uredbi, zato je uvedba ukrepov še vedno v interesu Unije.
Therefore, recitals 170 to 171 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Uvodni izjavi 170 in 171 začasne uredbe se zato potrdita.
Several interested parties contested the use of 15 % as the target profit for the Union industry as set out in recital 175 of the provisional Regulation, stating that this was unrealistically high for the Union biodiesel industry to expect.
Več zainteresiranih strani je nasprotovalo uporabi 15-odstotnega ciljnega dobička industrije Unije iz uvodne izjave 175 začasne uredbe, pri čemer so navedle, da je od industrije Unije na področju biodizla nerealno pričakovati tako visok ciljni dobiček.
However most of these interested parties then suggested replacing the target profit of 15 % with other data from other time periods, or from other investigations, without explaining why one time period, or one investigation, was more appropriate than another.
Večina teh zainteresiranih strani je potem predlagala, da se 15-odstotni ciljni dobiček nadomesti z drugimi podatki iz drugih obdobij ali iz drugih preiskav, ne da bi pri tem pojasnile, zakaj sta neko obdobje ali preiskava ustreznejša od drugih.
However, the Union biodiesel market has matured significantly since 2004-06 in many respects.
Vendar je trg Unije na področju biodizla od obdobja 2004–2006 v več pogledih dozorel.
Between 2004 and 2006, dumped imports had a negligible market share and other imports were also low.
Med letoma 2004 in 2006 je bil tržni delež dampinškega uvoza zanemarljiv in tudi drug uvoz je bil majhen.
During the IP dumped imports had a market share of 19 %.
V OP je tržni delež dampinškega uvoza znašal 19 %.
During the period 2004-06 the Union industry consisted of 40 companies, and now this has expanded to over 200, which has raised the level of competition.
V obdobju 2004–2006 je industrija Unije vključevala 40 družb, zdaj pa se je ta številka povečala na več kot 200 družb, zaradi česar se je povečala tudi raven konkurence.
Between 2004 and 2006 consumption rose dramatically from 2 million MT to 5 million MT, whereas in the period under consideration consumption rose only slightly, and capacity utilisation, which was 90 % between 2004 and 2006, was 55 % in the IP.
Med letoma 2004 in 2006 se je potrošnja močno povečala, tj. z 2 milijonov na 5 milijonov metričnih ton, medtem ko se je v obravnavanem obdobju le malo povečala, izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, ki je bila v obdobju 2004–2006 90-odstotna, pa je bila v OP 55-odstotna.
As a consequence, it is considered appropriate to take into account the market developments described above and to adjust target profit accordingly as to reflect the profit that the Union industry could expect to achieve under current market conditions.
Glede na to se šteje za primerno, da se upošteva zgoraj opisani tržni razvoj in ustrezno prilagodi ciljni dobiček, tako da bo izražal dobiček, ki bi ga industrija Unije lahko pričakovala pod trenutnimi tržnimi pogoji.
Therefore rather than taking the percentage profit, the actual profit for these three years in EUR per MT sold has been calculated.
Zato se je namesto v odstotkih izražen dobiček izračunal dejanski dobiček v eurih na prodano metrično tono v zadevnih treh letih.
For each year this has been taken to reflect 2011 prices and then averaged.
Ta je za vsako leto izražal cene iz leta 2011, nato pa je bilo izračunano povprečje.
Expressed as a percentage of turnover, the target profit for the Union industry in the IP is 11,0 %.
Ciljni dobiček za industrijo Unije v OP, izražen kot odstotek prihodkov od prodaje, je 11,0 %.
The injury elimination margin has therefore been recalculated on this basis.
Na podlagi tega je bila torej ponovno izračunana stopnja odprave škode.
Following definitive disclosure, with regard to the calculation of the injury margin, one interested party argued that the 5,1 % import duty to which RBD palm oil imported into the EU is subject, should be removed from the cost of production of the Union producers.
Ena zainteresirana stran je po dokončnem razkritju v zvezi z izračunom stopnje škode trdila, da bi bilo treba uvozno dajatev v višini 5,1 %, katere predmet je rafinirano, beljeno in razdišavljeno palmovo olje, ki se uvaža v Unijo, črtati iz stroškov proizvodnje proizvajalcev Unije.
This argument is rejected as this duty represents a cost for Union producers which import palm oil and should therefore be taken into account.
Ta trditev se zavrne, ker ta dajatev predstavlja strošek za proizvajalce Unije, ki uvažajo palmovo olje in bi se zato morala upoštevati.
Following definitive disclosure the complainants argued that the target profit of 15 % as proposed at provisional stage should be maintained.
Pritožniki so po dokončnem razkritju trdili, da bi bilo treba ciljni dobiček v višini 15 %, kakor je bil predlagan v začasni fazi, ohraniti.
However the arguments brought forward by the complainants do not relate to the objective for which target profit is to be established, i.e. profit that was realised by the Union industry in the absence of dumped imports.
Vendar pa se trditve pritožnikov ne nanašajo na razlog, zakaj je treba določiti ciljni dobiček, in sicer je razlog ta, da se ugotovi dobiček, ki ga je ustvarila industrija Unije v odsotnosti dampinškega uvoza.
Their argument is therefore rejected.
Zato se njihova trditev zavrne.
In the absence of other comments concerning the injury elimination level, the methodology described in recitals 176 to 177 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s stopnjo odprave škode ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se metodologija, opisana v uvodnih izjavah 176 in 177 začasne uredbe, potrdi.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, definitive anti-dumping measures should be imposed on imports of the product concerned at the level of the lower of the dumping and the injury margins, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Glede na sklepe v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročno zvezo in interesom Unije ter v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe bi bilo treba dokončne protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka uvesti na ravni stopnje dampinga ali stopnje škode, pri čemer se v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve upošteva tista stopnja, ki je nižja.
Anti-dumping duty rates have been established by comparing the injury elimination margins and dumping margins.
Stopnje protidampinške dajatve so bile ugotovljene na podlagi primerjave stopenj odprave škode in stopenj dampinga.
Consequently, the definitive anti-dumping duty rates, expressed on the CIF Union border price, customs duty unpaid, are as follows:
Stopnje dokončne protidampinške dajatve, izražene kot cena CIF meja Unije brez plačane carinske dajatve, so:
However as the anti-dumping duty will also apply to blends that include biodiesel (in proportion to their biodiesel content by weight), as well as to pure biodiesel, it will be more accurate, and more appropriate for the correct implementation of the duty by Customs authorities of the Member States, to express the duty as a fixed amount in euro per tonne net and apply this to the pure biodiesel imported, or the proportion of biodiesel in the blended product.
Ker bo protidampinška dajatev veljala tudi za mešanice, ki vključujejo biodizel (sorazmerno z njihovo vsebnostjo masnega deleža biodizla), in za čisti biodizel, bo za pravilno izvajanje dajatve s strani carinskih organov držav članic natančneje in ustrezneje, da se dajatev izrazi kot fiksni znesek v eurih na tono teže in se uporabi za uvožen čisti biodizel ali delež biodizla v mešanem izdelku.
Recital 183 of the provisional Regulation noted that imports of biodiesel from the countries concerned was subject to registration, so that if necessary duties could be collected up to 90 days prior to the imposition of provisional measures.
V uvodni izjavi 183 začasne uredbe je navedeno, da je treba uvoz biodizla iz zadevnih držav registrirati, da bi se lahko po potrebi dajatve pobrale do 90 dni pred uvedbo začasnih ukrepov.
This collection of duties on registered products is only possible if the conditions set out in Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation are met.
To pobiranje dajatev na registrirane izdelke je mogoče le, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 10(4) osnovne uredbe.
Having checked the import statistics for imports made after registration, rather than seeing a further substantial rise in imports before the imposition of provisional measures, imports dropped significantly.
Pregled statističnih podatkov o uvozu, izvedenem po registraciji, je pokazal, da se uvoz pred uvedbo začasnih ukrepov ni dodatno bistveno povečal, ampak se je močno zmanjšal.
The conditions are therefore not met and no duties will therefore be collected on registered imports.
Pogoji zato niso izpolnjeni in dajatve na registriran uvoz ne bodo pobrane.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigation.
Stopnje protidampinških dajatve za posamezne družbe, navedene v tej uredbi, so bile določene na podlagi ugotovitev sedanje preiskave.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during that investigation with respect to those companies.
Zato izražajo stanje, v kakršnem so bile te družbe med preiskavo.
These duty rates (as opposed to the country-wide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of product concerned originating in the countries concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatve (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celotno državo, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se torej uporabljajo izključno za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, ki ga proizvedejo družbe, tj. posamezne navedene pravne osebe.
Imported product concerned produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Za uvoženi zadevni izdelek, ki ga proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki ni posebej navedena v izvedbenem delu te uredbe, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedeni, teh stopenj ni mogoče uporabljati, pri čemer zanj velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse ostale družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting-up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [12] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Kateri koli zahtevek za uporabo stopenj protidampinške dajatve za posamezne družbe (npr. zaradi spremembe imena subjekta ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih subjektov) bi bilo treba nemudoma nasloviti na Komisijo [12], skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi podatki, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje ter domače in izvozne prodaje, povezani na primer s spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih subjektov.
If appropriate, the Regulation will accordingly be amended by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Po potrebi se ta uredba ustrezno spremeni s posodobljenim seznamom družb, ki so upravičene do individualnih stopenj dajatve.