natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Annex III is amended in accordance with Part B of the Annex to this Regulation;
Priloga III se spremeni v skladu z delom B Priloge k tej uredbi;
the list of Annexes is amended in accordance with Part C of the Annex to this Regulation.
seznam prilog se spremeni v skladu z delom C Priloge k tej uredbi.
Regulations (EU) No 1125/2010 and (EU) No 162/2011 are repealed.
Uredbi (EU) št. 1125/2010 in (EU) št. 162/2011 se razveljavita.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1125/2010 of 3 December 2010 determining the intervention centres for cereals and amending Regulation (EC) No 1173/2009 (OJ L 318, 4.12.2010, p. 10).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1125/2010 z dne 3. decembra 2010 o določitvi intervencijskih centrov za žita in spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1173/2009 (UL L 318, 4.12.2010, str. 10).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 162/2011 of 21 February 2011 determining the intervention centres for rice (OJ L 47, 22.2.2011, p. 11).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 162/2011 z dne 21. februarja 2011 o določitvi intervencijskih centrov za riž (UL L 47, 22.2.2011, str. 11).
OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.’;
UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str. 671.“;
A. Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 is amended as follows:
A. Priloga I k Uredbi (EU) št. 1272/2009 se spremeni:
In Part I, point (b) of the second paragraph is replaced by the following:
v delu I se točka (b) drugega odstavka nadomesti z naslednjim:
for barley and maize those set by Directive 2002/32/EC.’
za ječmen in koruzo merila iz Direktive 2002/32/ES.“;
In Part II, the column headed ‘Sorghum’ is deleted.
v delu II se črta stolpec z naslovom „Sirek“;
In point 1.1, the third subparagraph is deleted.
v točki 1.1 se črta tretji pododstavek;
Point 1.2 is amended as follows:
točka 1.2 se spremeni:
In the second subparagraph of (a), the words ‘or sorghum’ are deleted.
v drugem pododstavku točke (a) se črtata besedi „in sirek“;
In the second subparagraph of (b), the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted.
v drugem pododstavku točke (b) se črtata besedi „in sirku“;
In the second subparagraph of (c), the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted.
v drugem pododstavku točke (c) se črtata besedi „in sirku“;
The second subparagraph of (d) is replaced by the following:
drugi pododstavek točke (d) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘“Grains in which the germ is discoloured” does not apply to barley or maize.’
„Opredelitev ‚zrna, pri katerih je seme izgubilo barvo‘, ne velja za ječmen in koruzo.“;
In the second subparagraph of (e), the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted.
v drugem pododstavku točke (e) se črtata besedi „in sirku“;
Point (f) is replaced by the following:
točka (f) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
“Mottled grains” does not apply to common wheat, barley or maize.’
Opredelitev ‚lisasta zrna‘ ne velja za navadno pšenico, ječmen in koruzo.“;
In the second paragraph of point 1.3, the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted.
v drugem odstavku točke 1.3 se črtata besedi „in sirku“;
Point 1.4 is amended as follows:
točka 1.4 se spremeni:
In the second subparagraph of (a), the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted
v drugem pododstavku točke (a) se črtata besedi „in sirku“;
The second subparagraph of (f) is replaced by the following:
drugi pododstavek točke (f) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘“Decayed grains” does not apply to barley or maize.’
„Opredelitev ‚gnila zrna‘ ne velja za ječmen in koruzo.“;
Point 2.5 is deleted.
točka 2.5 se črta;
Part IV is amended as follows:
del IV se spremeni:
In the second indent of point (a), the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted.
v drugi alinei točke (a) se črtata besedi „in sirek“;
Point (c) is deleted.
točka (c) se črta;
Part V is amended as follows:
del V se spremeni:
In the title, the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted.
v naslovu se črtata besedi „in sirek“;
In the first subparagraph, the words ‘and 250 g in the case of sorghum’ are deleted.
v prvem pododstavku se črtajo besede „ter 250 g za sirek“;
The fourth subparagraph is replaced by:
četrti pododstavek se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Using a separator, separate the fraction retained by the sieve with slotted perforations of 1,0 mm to obtain a subsample of 100 to 200 g in the case of maize. Weigh this subsample. Spread it out in a thin layer on a table. Using tweezers or a spatula, extract the other cereals, grains damaged by pests, grains overheated during drying, sprouted grains, extraneous seeds, damaged grains, husks and impurities of animal origin. Then assess the state of the grain.’
„Del, ki je ostal na situ z odprtinami v obliki rež velikosti 1,0 mm se razdeli s pomočjo separatorja, da se pridobi delni vzorec 100 do 200 g pri koruzi. Delni vzorec se stehta. Razgrne se po mizi v tankem sloju. S pomočjo pincete ali lopatice se odstranijo druga žita, zrna, ki so jih napadli škodljivci, zrna, pregreta med sušenjem, nakaljena zrna, tuja zrna, poškodovana zrna, pleve in luske ter nečistoče živalskega izvora. Nato se oceni stanje zrna.“;
In the fifth subparagraph, the words ‘and 1,8 mm in diameter in the case of sorghum’ are deleted.
v petem pododstavku se črtajo besede „in 1,8 mm pri sirku“;
Part IX is amended as follows:
del IX se spremeni:
in the first column of Table I, the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted;
v prvem stolpcu tabele I se črtata besedi „in sirek“;
in the first column of Table II, the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted.
v prvem stolpcu tabele II se črtata besedi „in sirek“;
Part X is deleted.
del X se črta;
Part XI is amended as follows:
del XI se spremeni:
In point (a), the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted.
v točki (a) se črtata besedi „in sirek“;
In point (c), the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted.
v točki (c) se črtata besedi „in sirku“;
In point (d), the words ‘and sorghum’ are deleted.
v točki (d) se črtata besedi „in sirku“;
Point (f) is replaced by:
točka (f) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
where the percentage of miscellaneous impurities (Schwarzbesatz) exceeds 0,5 % for durum wheat and 1 % for common wheat, barley and maize, a reduction of EUR 0,1 shall be applied for each additional 0,1 percentage point;’
če odstotek raznih nečistoč (črne primesi) presega 0,5 % pri durum pšenici in 1 % pri navadni pšenici, ječmenu in koruzi, velja znižanje cene v višini 0,1 EUR za vsako dodatno 0,1-odstotno točko;“;
Point (i) is deleted.
točka (i) se črta.
B. Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 is amended as follows:
B. Priloga III k Uredbi (EU) št. 1272/2009 se spremeni:
In Part I(1), points (a) and (b) are replaced by the following:
v delu I(1) se točke (a) in (b) nadomestita z naslednjim:
meat of uncastrated male animals aged from 12 months to less than 24 months (category A);
meso nekastriranih samcev, starih od 12 mesecev do manj kot 24 mesecev (kategorija A);
meat of castrated male animals aged from 12 months (category C);
meso kastriranih samcev, starejših od 12 mesecev (kategorija C);
meat of male animals aged from 8 months to less than 12 months (category Z).’
meso samcev, starih od 8 mesecev do manj kot 12 mesecev (kategorija Z).“;
Part V is replaced by the following:
del V se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘PART V
„DEL V
Classification of products
Klasifikacija proizvodov
For the purpose of this Part, category Z refers only to male animals as described in paragraph 1(c) of Part I of this Annex.
Za namene tega dela se kategorija Z nanaša samo na samce, kot so opisani v odstavku 1(c) dela I te priloge.
C. The List of Annexes to Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 is amended as follows:
C. Seznam prilog k Uredbi (EU) št. 1272/2009 se spremeni:
Part V of Annex I is replaced by the following:
del V Priloge I se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Reference method for determining matter other than basic cereals of unimpaired quality in the case of maize’
„Standardna metoda za določanje snovi, ki niso osnovno žito neoporečne kakovosti, za koruzo“;
Part X of Annex I is deleted.
del X Priloge I se črta.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 341/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 341/2014
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 342/2014
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 342/2014
supplementing Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the application of the calculation methods of capital adequacy requirements for financial conglomerates
o dopolnitvi Direktive 2002/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z regulativnimi tehničnimi standardi za uporabo metod za izračun kapitalskih zahtev za finančne konglomerate
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 [1] and in particular Article 49(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o bonitetnih zahtevah za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja ter o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 [1] in zlasti člena 49(6) Uredbe,
Having regard to Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC, 79/267/EEC, 92/49/EEC, 92/96/EEC, 93/6/EEC and 93/22/EEC, and Directives 98/78/EC and 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] and in particular to Article 21a(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/87/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2002 o dopolnilnem nadzoru kreditnih institucij, zavarovalnic in investicijskih družb v finančnem konglomeratu, ki spreminja direktive Sveta 73/239/EGS, 79/267/EGS, 92/49/EGS, 92/96/EGS, 93/6/EGS in 93/22/EGS ter direktivi 98/78/ES in 2000/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] ter zlasti člena 21a(3) Direktive,
For financial conglomerates which include significant banking or investment business and insurance business, multiple use of elements eligible for the calculation of own funds at the level of the financial conglomerate that is to say, multiple gearing as well as any inappropriate intra-group creation of own funds should be eliminated in order to accurately reflect the availability of conglomerates' own funds to absorb losses and to ensure supplementary capital adequacy at the level of the financial conglomerate.
Pri finančnih konglomeratih, ki vključujejo pomembne banke ali investicijska podjetja in zavarovalnice, bi bilo treba odpraviti večkratno uporabo sestavin, sprejemljivih za izračun kapitala na ravni finančnega konglomerata, tj. večkratno uporabo kapitala, ter vsako neprimerno ustvarjanje kapitala znotraj skupine, da se ustrezno upoštevata razpoložljivost kapitala konglomeratov za pokritje izgub in zagotovitev dopolnilne kapitalske ustreznosti na ravni finančnega konglomerata.
It is important to ensure that own funds in excess of sectoral solvency requirements are only included at conglomerate level if there are no impediments to the transfer of assets or repayment of liabilities across different conglomerate entities, including across sectors.
Pomembno je zagotoviti, da je kapital, ki presega sektorske kapitalske zahteve, na ravni finančnega konglomerata vključen le, če ni ovir za prenos sredstev ali poravnavo obveznosti med različnimi subjekti konglomerata, vključno med sektorji.
A financial conglomerate should only include own funds that exceed sectoral solvency requirements in the calculation of its own funds if those funds are transferable across entities within the financial conglomerate.
Finančni konglomerat bi lahko kapital, ki presega sektorske kapitalske zahteve, v izračun svojega kapitala vključil le, če je ta kapital prenosljiv med različnimi subjekti znotraj finančnega konglomerata.
Appropriate rules should take into account that sector-specific own funds requirements are designed to cover risks relating to that sector, and are not intended to cover risks outside that sector.
V okviru ustreznih pravil bi bilo treba upoštevati, da so kapitalske zahteve posameznega sektorja namenjene kritju tveganj, povezanih s tem sektorjem, in da niso namenjene kritju tveganj zunaj zadevnega sektorja.
To ensure consistent application of the supplementary capital adequacy calculation the sectoral requirements which comprise solvency requirements for this purpose should be listed.
Za zagotovitev dosledne uporabe izračuna dopolnilne kapitalske ustreznosti bi bilo treba navesti sektorske zahteve, ki zajemajo kapitalske zahteve za ta namen.
Those requirements should be without prejudice to the sectoral provisions concerning the measures to be taken following a breach of sectoral solvency requirements.
Te zahteve ne bi smele posegati v sektorske določbe v zvezi z ukrepi, ki jih je treba sprejeti ob kršitvi sektorskih kapitalskih zahtev.
In particular, where a deficit arises at the level of a financial conglomerate due to a breach in the combined buffer requirement under Chapter 4 of Title VII of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], the necessary measures required should be based on those set out in that Chapter.
Zlasti v primeru primanjkljaja na ravni finančnega konglomerata zaradi kršitve zahteve po skupnem blažilniku iz poglavja 4 naslova VII Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] bi morali potrebni ukrepi temeljiti na ukrepih iz navedenega poglavja.
When calculating the supplementary capital adequacy requirement of a financial conglomerate, both a notional solvency requirement and a notional level of own funds should be calculated for non-regulated financial entities within the financial conglomerate.
Pri izračunu dopolnilne kapitalske zahteve finančnega konglomerata bi bilo treba izračunati prilagojeno kapitalsko zahtevo in tudi prilagojeno raven kapitala za nenadzorovane finančne subjekte znotraj finančnega konglomerata.
Part II of Annex I to Directive 2002/87/EC sets out three technical methods for calculating capital adequacy requirements at the level of the financial conglomerate: ‘Accounting consolidation method’ (method 1), ‘Deduction and aggregation method’ (method 2) and ‘Combination method’ (method 3), allowing the combination of method 1 and method 2.
Del II Priloge I k Direktivi 2002/87/ES določa tri tehnične metode za izračun kapitalskih zahtev na ravni finančnega konglomerata: „računovodska konsolidacija“ (metoda 1), „odbitki in združevanja“ (metoda 2) ter „kombinacija metod“ (metoda 3), ki omogoča kombinacijo metode 1 in metode 2.
The technical calculation methods 1 and 2 should be specified to ensure their consistent application.
Metodi tehničnega izračuna 1 in 2 bi bilo treba natančno opredeliti, da se zagotovi njuna dosledna uporaba.
In addition, the circumstances for the use of method 3 should be specified and it should be ensured that the competent authorities permit the use of that method in similar circumstances, apply common criteria and require that method to be applied in a way which is consistent across financial conglomerates.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba opredeliti okoliščine za uporabo metode 3, pri čemer bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da pristojni organi dovolijo uporabo te metode v podobnih okoliščinah, uporabljajo skupna merila in zahtevajo, da se ta metoda uporablja dosledno v vseh finančnih konglomeratih.
The competent authorities should only allow the application of method 3 where a financial conglomerate can demonstrate that the application of method 1 or 2 alone would not be reasonably feasible.
Pristojni organi bi morali uporabo metode 3 dovoliti samo, če lahko finančni konglomerat dokaže, da uporaba samo metode 1 ali 2 ne bi bila razumno izvedljiva.
The use of method 3 should be consistent over time to ensure equivalent conditions.
Uporaba metode 3 bi morala biti vedno dosledna, da bi se zagotovili enakovredni pogoji.
As the technical calculation methods are carried out in accordance with the technical principles referred to in Part I of Annex I to Directive 2002/87/EC, it is necessary to specify those principles as well.
Ker se tehnične metode izračuna uporabljajo v skladu s tehničnimi načeli iz dela I Priloge I k Direktivi 2002/87/ES, je treba natančno opredeliti tudi ta načela.
Method 1 for calculating group solvency, as set out in Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] and method 1 for calculating supplementary capital adequacy requirements, as set out in Directive 2002/87/EC should be considered equivalent since both methods are consistent with the main objectives of supplementary supervision.
Metodo 1 za izračun kapitalske ustreznosti skupine iz Direktive 2009/138/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] ter metodo 1 za izračun dopolnilnih kapitalskih zahtev iz Direktive 2002/87/ES bi bilo treba šteti za enakovredni, ker sta obe metodi skladni z glavnimi cilji dopolnilnega nadzora.
Both methods ensure the elimination of intra-group creation of own funds and the calculation of own funds in accordance with the definitions and limits established in the relevant sectoral rules.
Obe metodi zagotavljata odpravo ustvarjanja kapitala znotraj skupine ter izračun kapitala v skladu z opredelitvami in omejitvami, določenimi z ustreznimi sektorskimi pravili.
The empowerment to adopt regulatory technical standards in Article 49(6) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 is closely linked with the empowerment in Article 21a(3) of Directive 2002/87/EC, since both deal with consistent application of the methods of calculation laid down in the Annex to that Directive.
Pooblastilo za sprejetje regulativnih tehničnih standardov iz člena 49(6) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 je tesno povezano s pooblastilom iz člena 21a(3) Direktive 2002/87/ES, ker je pri obeh obravnavana dosledna uporaba metod izračuna iz Priloge k navedeni direktivi.
To ensure coherence in the methods of calculation specified for the purpose of those legislative acts and to facilitate a comprehensive view and compact access to them by persons subject to those obligations it is desirable to lay down the regulatory technical standards adopted pursuant to those empowerments in a single Regulation.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti metod izračuna, opredeljenih za namene navedenih zakonodajnih aktov, ter za omogočanje celovitega pregleda nad temi metodami in enotnega dostopa do njih za osebe, za katere veljajo navedene obveznosti, je zaželeno, da se regulativni tehnični standardi, sprejeti v skladu s tema pooblastiloma, vključijo v eno uredbo.
This Regulation should be based on the new sectoral solvency regimes that have been established in the Union in order to ensure the most consistent application of the calculation methods.
Ta uredba bi morala temeljiti na novih sektorskih režimih kapitalske ustreznosti, ki so bili vzpostavljeni v Uniji, da se zagotovi čim doslednejša uporaba metod izračuna.
This Regulation should therefore not apply before the date of application of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Zato se ne bi smela uporabljati pred datumom začetka uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
The rules dependent on the application of Directive 2009/138/EC should begin to apply from the date of application of that Directive.
Pravila, ki so odvisna od uporabe Direktive 2009/138/ES, bi se morala začeti uporabljati od datuma začetka uporabe navedene direktive.
Existing national implementation of the calculation of supplementary capital adequacy requirements should therefore continue to be used in those areas that have not been harmonised by this Regulation in the period before it applies in full, and underlying calculations that are based on insurance sectoral rules should be based on the insurance sectoral rules that apply at the time of that calculation.
V obdobju pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe v celoti bi se zato na področjih, ki z njo niso bila usklajena, še naprej moralo uporabljati obstoječe nacionalno izvajanje izračuna dopolnilnih kapitalskih zahtev, temeljni izračuni, ki temeljijo na zavarovalniških sektorskih pravilih, pa bi morali temeljiti na zavarovalniških sektorskih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo v času zadevnega izračuna.
This Regulation is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted jointly by the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) (EBA), European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) (EIOPA) and European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) (ESMA) to the Commission.
Ta uredba temelji na osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, ki so jih Komisiji skupaj predložili Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski bančni organ) (EBA), Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine) (EIOPA) in Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge) (ESMA).
The EBA, EIOPA and ESMA have conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits, in accordance with Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5], Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] and Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [7], and requested the opinion of the Banking Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, Insurance and Reinsurance Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 and Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010,
EBA, EIOPA in ESMA so opravili odprta javna posvetovanja o osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, na katerih temelji ta uredba, analizirali morebitne z njimi povezane stroške in koristi v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5], členom 10 Uredbe (EU) št. 1094/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6] in členom 10 Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7] ter zaprosili za mnenje interesno skupino za bančništvo, ustanovljeno v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010, interesno skupino za zavarovanja in pozavarovanja, ustanovljeno v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1094/2010, ter interesno skupino za vrednostne papirje in trge, ustanovljeno v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010 –
This Regulation specifies the technical principles and technical calculation methods listed in Annex I to Directive 2002/87/EC for the purposes of the alternatives to deduction referred to Article 49(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and for the purposes of calculating own funds and supplementary capital adequacy requirement as provided for in Article 6(2) of Directive 2002/87/EC.
Ta uredba določa tehnična načela in tehnične metode izračuna, navedene v Prilogi I k Direktivi 2002/87/ES, za namene drugih možnosti odbitka iz člena 49(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 ter za namene izračuna kapitala in dopolnilne kapitalske zahteve iz člena 6(2) Direktive 2002/87/ES.
‘insurance-led financial conglomerate’ means a financial conglomerate the most important financial sector of which is insurance, in accordance with Article 3(2) of Directive 2002/87/EC;
„finančni konglomerat, usmerjen v zavarovalništvo“ pomeni finančni konglomerat, katerega najpomembnejši finančni sektor je zavarovalništvo v skladu s členom 3(2) Direktive 2002/87/ES;
‘banking-led or investment-led financial conglomerate’ means a financial conglomerate the most important financial sector of which is either the banking sector or the investment services sector, in accordance with Article 3(2) of Directive 2002/87/EC.
„finančni konglomerat, usmerjen v bančništvo ali naložbe“ pomeni finančni konglomerat, katerega najpomembnejši finančni sektor je bančni sektor ali sektor investicijskih storitev v skladu s členom 3(2) Direktive 2002/87/ES.
TECHNICAL PRINCIPLES
TEHNIČNA NAČELA
Elimination of multiple gearing and the intra-group creation of own funds
Odprava večkratne uporabe kapitala in ustvarjanja kapitala znotraj skupine