natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The entries in food subcategory 04.2.5.3 ‘Other similar fruit or vegetable spreads’ for E 952, E 954, E 955, E 959 and E 960 are replaced by the following:
Vnosi v podkategoriji živil 04.2.5.3 „Drugi podobni sadni in zelenjavni namazi“ za E 952, E 954, E 955, E 959 in E 960 se nadomestijo z naslednjimi:
Cyclamic acid and its Na and Ca salts
ciklamna kislina ter njene natrijeve in kalcijeve soli
only energy-reduced fruit or vegetable spreads and dried-fruit-based sandwich spreads, energy-reduced or with no added sugar
samo sadni in zelenjavni namazi z zmanjšano energijsko vrednostjo ter namazi na osnovi suhega sadja z zmanjšano energijsko vrednostjo ali brez dodanega sladkorja
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 914/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 914/2013
establishing budgetary ceilings for 2013 applicable to certain direct support schemes provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
o določitvi zgornjih mej proračuna za leto 2013 za nekatere sheme neposrednih podpor iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 [1], and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 51(2), the first subparagraph of Article 69(3), the first subparagraph of Article 123(1), the first subparagraph of Article 131(4) and Article 142(c) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 z dne 19. januarja 2009 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, spremembi uredb (ES) št. 1290/2005, (ES) št. 247/2006, (ES) št. 378/2007 in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 [1] ter zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 51(2), prvega pododstavka člena 69(3), prvega pododstavka člena 123(1), prvega pododstavka člena 131(4) in člena 142(c) Uredbe,
For the Member States implementing, in 2013, the single payment scheme provided for under Title III of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, the budgetary ceilings for each of the payments referred to in Articles 52, 53 and 54 of that Regulation should be established for 2013.
Za države članice, ki leta 2013 izvajajo shemo enotnega plačila iz naslova III Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, bi bilo treba za leto 2013 določiti zgornje meje proračuna za vsako plačilo iz členov 52, 53 in 54 navedene uredbe.
For the Member States making use, in 2013, of the options provided for in Articles 69(1) or 131(1) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, the budgetary ceilings for the specific support referred to in Chapter 5 of Title III of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 should be established for 2013.
Za države članice, ki leta 2013 uporabljajo možnosti iz člena 69(1) ali člena 131(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, bi bilo treba za leto 2013 določiti zgornje meje proračuna za posebno podporo iz poglavja 5 naslova III Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
Article 69(4) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 limits the resources that can be used for any coupled measure provided for in points (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of Article 68(1)(a) and in Article 68(1)(b) and (e) to 3,5 % of the national ceiling referred to in Article 40 of the same Regulation.
S členom 69(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 so sredstva, ki se lahko uporabljajo za kateri koli vezani ukrep iz točk (i), (ii), (iii) in (iv) člena 68(1)(a) ter člena 68(1)(b) in (e), omejena na 3,5 % nacionalne zgornje meje iz člena 40 navedene uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 69(6)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, the amounts calculated in accordance with Article 69(7) of that Regulation have been laid down in Annex III of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 of 29 October 2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the single payment scheme provided for in Title III of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 [2].
V skladu s členom 69(6)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 so zneski, izračunani v skladu s členom 69(7) navedene uredbe, določeni v Prilogi III k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1120/2009 z dne 29. oktobra 2009 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje sheme enotnega plačila iz naslova III Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 [2].
For the sake of clarity, the 2013 budgetary ceilings for the single payment scheme, resulting from deduction of the ceilings established for the payments referred to in Articles 52 53, 54 and 68 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 from the ceilings given in Annex VIII to the same Regulation, should be published.
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba za leto 2013 objaviti zgornje meje proračuna za shemo enotnega plačila, ki izhajajo iz odbitka zgornjih mej, določenih za plačila iz členov 52, 53, 54 in 68 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, od zgornjih mej iz Priloge VIII k isti uredbi.
The amount to be deducted from the said Annex VIII in order to finance the specific support provided for in Article 68 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 corresponds to the difference between the total amount for the specific support notified by the Member States and the amounts notified to finance the specific support in accordance with article 69(6)(a) of the same Regulation.
Znesek, ki ga je treba odbiti od navedene Priloge VIII, da bi se financirala posebna podpora iz člena 68 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, ustreza razliki med skupnim zneskom za posebno podporo, ki so ga sporočile države članice, in sporočenimi zneski za financiranje posebne podpore v skladu s členom 69(6)(a) navedene uredbe.
Where a Member State implementing the single payment scheme decides to grant the support referred to in point (c) of Article 68(1), the amount notified to the Commission is to be included in the single payment scheme ceiling, as this support takes the form of an increase in the unit value and/or the number of the farmer’s payment entitlements.
Kadar se država članica, ki izvaja shemo enotnega plačila, odloči, da bo dodelila podporo iz točke (c) člena 68(1), se znesek, sporočen Komisiji, vključi v zgornjo mejo sheme enotnega plačila, ker se ta podpora dodeli v obliki povečanja zneska na enoto in/ali števila kmetovih pravic do plačila.
For Member States implementing, in 2013, the single area payment scheme provided for in Chapter 2 of Title V of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, the annual financial envelopes should be established in accordance with Article 123(1) of that Regulation.
Za države članice, ki leta 2013 izvajajo shemo enotnega plačila iz poglavja 2 naslova V Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009, bi bilo treba letne finančne okvire določiti v skladu s členom 123(1) navedene uredbe.
For the sake of clarity, the maximum amount of funds available to Member States applying the single area payment scheme for granting separate sugar payments in 2013 under Article 126 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, established on the basis of their notification, should be published.
Zaradi jasnosti je treba objaviti največje zneske sredstev, ki so na voljo državam članicam, ki uporabljajo shemo enotnega plačila na površino za dodelitev ločenih plačil za sladkor iz člena 126 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 leta 2013, določene na podlagi njihovih sporočil.
For the sake of clarity, the maximum amount of funds available to Member States applying the single area payment scheme for granting separate fruit and vegetables payments in 2013 pursuant to Article 127 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, established on the basis of their notification, should be published.
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba objaviti največje zneske sredstev, ki so na voljo državam članicam, ki uporabljajo shemo enotnega plačila na površino za dodelitev ločenih plačil za sadje in zelenjavo iz člena 127 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 leta 2013, določene na podlagi njihovih sporočil.
For the sake of clarity, the maximum amount of funds available to Member States applying the single area payment scheme for granting separate soft fruit payments in 2013 pursuant to Article 129 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, established on the basis of their notification, should be published
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba objaviti največje zneske sredstev, ki so na voljo državam članicam, ki uporabljajo shemo enotnega plačila na površino za dodelitev ločenih plačil za jagodičevje iz člena 129 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 leta 2013, določene na podlagi njihovih sporočil.
The budgetary ceilings for 2013 referred to in Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 are set out in Annex I to this Regulation.
Zgornje meje proračuna za leto 2013 iz člena 51(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 so določene v Prilogi I k tej uredbi.
The budgetary ceilings for 2013 referred to in Article 69(3) and 131(4) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 are set out in Annex II to this Regulation.
Zgornje meje proračuna za leto 2013 iz člena 69(3) in člena 131(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 so določene v Prilogi II k tej uredbi.
The budgetary ceilings for 2013 for the support provided for in points (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of Article 68(1)(a) and in Article 68(1)(b) and (e) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 are set out in Annex III to this Regulation.
Zgornje meje proračuna za leto 2013 za podporo iz točk (i), (ii), (iii) in (iv) člena 68(1)(a) ter člena 68(1)(b) in (e) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 so določene v Prilogi III k tej uredbi.
The amounts that can be used by the Member States in accordance with Article 69(6)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 to cover the specific support provided in Article 68(1) of the same Regulation are set out in Annex IV to this Regulation.
Zneski, ki jih države članice lahko uporabijo v skladu s členom 69(6)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 za kritje posebne podpore iz člena 68(1) navedene uredbe, so določeni v Prilogi IV k tej uredbi.
The budgetary ceilings for 2013 for the single payment scheme referred to in Title III of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 are set out in Annex V to this Regulation.
Zgornje meje proračuna za leto 2013 za shemo enotnega plačila iz naslova III Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 so določene v Prilogi V k tej uredbi.
The annual financial envelopes for 2013 referred to in Article 123(1) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 are set out in Annex VI to this Regulation.
Letni finančni okviri za leto 2013 iz člena 123(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 so določeni v Prilogi VI k tej uredbi.
The maximum amounts of funding available to the Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia for granting the separate sugar payment in 2013, as referred to in Article 126 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, are set out in Annex VII to this Regulation.
Največji zneski sredstev, ki so na voljo Češki, Madžarski, Latviji, Litvi, Poljski, Romuniji in Slovaški za dodelitev ločenih plačil za sladkor iz člena 126 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 v letu 2013, so določeni v Prilogi VII k tej uredbi.
The maximum amounts of funding available to the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia for granting the separate fruit and vegetables payment in 2013, as referred to in Article 127 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, are set out in Annex VIII to this Regulation.
Največji zneski sredstev, ki so na voljo Češki, Madžarski, Poljski in Slovaški za dodelitev ločenih plačil za sadje in zelenjavo iz člena 127 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 v letu 2013, so določeni v Prilogi VIII k tej uredbi.
The maximum amounts of funding available to Bulgaria, Hungary and Poland for granting the separate soft fruit payment in 2013, as referred to in Article 129 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, are set out in Annex IX to this Regulation.
Največji zneski sredstev, ki so na voljo Bolgariji, Madžarski in Poljski za dodelitev ločenih plačil za jagodičevje iz člena 129 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 v letu 2013, so določeni v Prilogi IX k tej uredbi.
Budgetary ceilings for direct payments to be granted in accordance with Articles 52, 53 and 54 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
Zgornje meje proračuna za neposredna plačila, ki se dodelijo v skladu s členi 52, 53 in 54 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009
2013 calendar year
Koledarsko leto 2013
Budgetary ceilings for the specific support provided for in Article 68(1) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
Zgornje meje proračuna za posebno podporo iz člena 68(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009
2013 Calendar year
Koledarsko leto 2013
Slovenia: 5800 thousand EUR
Slovenija: 5800 tisoč EUR.
Budgetary ceilings for the support provided for in points (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) of article 68(1)(a) and article 68(1)(b) and (e) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
Zgornje meje proračuna za podporo iz točk (i), (ii), (iii) in (iv) člena 68(1)(a) ter člena 68(1)(b) in (e) Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009
Amounts to be used by the Member States in accordance with Article 69(6)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 to cover the specific support provided in Article 68(1) of that Regulation
Zneski, ki jih države članice uporabijo v skladu s členom 69(6)(a) uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009 za kritje posebne podpore iz člena 68(1) navedene uredbe
Maximum amounts of funding available to member states for granting the separate sugar payments referred to in article 126 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
Največji zneski sredstev, ki so na voljo državam članicam za dodelitev ločenih plačil za sladkor iz člena 126 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009
Maximum amounts of funding available to Member States for granting the separate fruit and vegetables payments referred to in article 127 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
Največji zneski sredstev, ki so na voljo državam članicam za dodelitev ločenih plačil za sadje in zelenjavo iz člena 127 uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009
Maximum amounts of funding available to member states for granting the separate soft fruit payments referred to in Article 129 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009
Največji zneski sredstev, ki so na voljo državam članicam za dodelitev ločenih plačil za jagodičevje iz člena 129 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 915/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 915/2013
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 of 19 February 2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe [1], and in particular Article 11(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 314/2004 z dne 19. februarja 2004 o nekaterih omejevalnih ukrepih v zvezi z Zimbabvejem [1], zlasti člena 11(b) Uredbe,
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 lists the persons and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.
Priloga III k Uredbi (ES) št. 314/2004 navaja osebe, skupine in subjekte, ki jih zadeva zamrznitev sredstev in gospodarskih virov iz navedene uredbe.
On 23 September 2013, the Council decided to remove one entry from the list of persons and entities to whom the restrictions should apply.
Svet se je 23. septembra 2013 odločil črtati en vnos s seznama oseb in subjektov, za katere bi morale veljati omejitve.
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 should be amended to ensure consistency with that decision of the Council.
Prilogo III k Uredbi (ES) št. 314/2004 bi bilo treba spremeniti, da se zagotovi njena skladnost z navedeno odločitvijo Sveta.
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga III k Uredbi (ES) št. 314/2004 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
OJ L 42, 16.2.2011, p. 6–23.
UL L 42, 16.2.2011, str. 6–23.
The following entry is deleted from the heading ‘II. Entities’:
pod naslovom „II. Subjekti“ se črta naslednji vnos:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 916/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 916/2013
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 917/2013
amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 857/2010 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 857/2010 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Irana, Pakistana in Združenih arabskih emiratov
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 15(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 15(1) Uredbe,
By Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 857/2010 [2] (‘the contested Regulation’), the Council imposed definitive countervailing duties ranging from EUR 42,34 per tonne to EUR 139,70 per tonne on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate having a viscosity number of 78 ml/g or higher, according to the ISO Standard 1628-5, originating in Iran, Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates.
Svet je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 857/2010 [2] („izpodbijana uredba“) uvedel dokončne izravnalne dajatve v višini od 42,34 EUR na tono do 139,70 EUR na tono na uvoz določenih vrst polietilen tereftalata z viskoznim številom 78 ml/g ali več v skladu s standardom ISO 1628-5 s poreklom iz Irana, Pakistana in Združenih arabskih emiratov.
On 6 December 2010, the cooperating exporting producer in Pakistan, namely Novatex Ltd (‘Novatex’ or ‘the company concerned’), lodged an application at the General Court seeking the annulment of the contested Regulation in so far as it applied to the applicant [3].
Sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik v Pakistanu, tj. Novatex Ltd („Novatex“ ali „zadevna družba“), je 6. decembra 2010 vložil tožbo pri Splošnem sodišču, da bi dosegel razglasitev ničnosti izpodbijane uredbe, v kolikor se nanaša na vložnika [3].
On 11 October 2012, the General Court in its judgment in Case T-556/10 (‘the General Court judgment’) found that the failure by the Commission and the Council to take account of the figure resulting from the revision of line 74 of the 2008 tax return of the company concerned, and the error resulting therefrom, affected the legality of Article 1 of the contested Regulation in so far as the definitive countervailing duty fixed by the Council exceeded the duty applicable in the absence of that error.
Splošno sodišče je 11. oktobra 2012 v sodbi v zadevi T-556/10 („sodba Splošnega sodišča“) ugotovilo, da Komisija in Svet nista upoštevala zneska, ki izhaja iz spremembe v vrstici 74 napovedi za odmero davka za leto 2008 zadevne družbe, napaka, do katere je zaradi tega prišlo, pa vpliva na zakonitost člena 1 izpodbijane uredbe, saj je dokončna izravnalna dajatev, ki jo je določil Svet, presegla dajatev, ki bi se uporabila, če do navedene napake ne bi prišlo.
Therefore, the General Court annulled Article 1 of the contested Regulation in so far as it concerned Novatex and in so far as the definitive countervailing duty exceeded that applicable in the absence of the error.
Zato je Splošno sodišče za ničnega razglasilo člen 1 izpodbijane uredbe, v kolikor se nanaša na družbo Novatex in če je bila dokončna izravnalna dajatev višja od tiste, ki bi se uporabljala, če do napake ne bi prišlo.
In Case T-2/95 [4], the General Court held that, in cases where a proceeding consists of several administrative steps, the annulment of one of those steps does not annul the complete proceeding.
Splošno sodišče je v zadevi T-2/95 [4] („zadeva IPS“) ugotovilo, da razglasitev ničnosti enega dela postopka v postopkih, sestavljenih iz več upravnih delov, ne pomeni, da je celotni postopek ničen.
This anti-subsidy proceeding is an example of such a multi-step proceeding.
Ta protisubvencijski postopek je primer takega postopka v več korakih.
Consequently, the annulment of a part of the contested Regulation does not imply the annulment of the entire procedure prior to the adoption of that Regulation.
Delna razveljavitev izpodbijane uredbe zato ne pomeni razveljavitve celotnega postopka, ki je potekal pred sprejetjem navedene uredbe.
Moreover, according to Article 266 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Union institutions are obliged to comply with the General Court judgment.
Poleg tega morajo institucije Unije v skladu s členom 266 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije upoštevati sodbo Splošnega sodišča.
This also implies the possibility to remedy the aspects of the contested Regulation which led to its partial annulment, while leaving unchanged the uncontested parts which are unaffected by the General Court judgment.
To pomeni tudi, da se lahko popravijo tisti deli izpodbijane uredbe, ki so privedli do delne ničnosti, pri tem pa se deli, ki niso bili izpodbijani in o katerih v sodbi Splošnega sodišča ni bilo odločeno, ne spremenijo.
It should be noted that all other findings made in the contested Regulation remain valid.
Treba je poudariti, da vse druge ugotovitve iz izpodbijane uredbe ostanejo veljavne.
Following the General Court judgment, on 17 May 2013 the Commission partially reopened the anti-subsidy investigation concerning imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating, inter alia, in Pakistan (‘the notice’) [5].
Po sodbi Splošnega sodišča je Komisija 17. maja 2013 delno ponovno odprla protisubvencijsko preiskavo v zvezi z uvozom nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata s poreklom, med drugim, iz Pakistana (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obvestilo) [5].
The reopening was limited in scope to the implementation of the General Court judgment in so far as Novatex is concerned.
Obnova je bila po obsegu omejena na izvrševanje sodbe Splošnega sodišča, v kolikor je zadevala družbo Novatex.
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, importers, users and raw material suppliers known to be concerned, the representatives of the exporting country and the Union industry of the partial reopening of the investigation.
Komisija je o delni obnovi preiskave uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike, uporabnike in dobavitelje surovin, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, predstavnike države izvoznice in industrijo Unije.
No interested party requested to be heard.
Nobena od zainteresiranih strani ni zaprosila za zaslišanje.
All parties concerned were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of an amended definitive countervailing duty on Novatex.
Vse zadevne strani so bile obveščene o pomembnih dejstvih in pomislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba spremenjenih dokončnih izravnalnih dajatev za družbo Novatex.
It is recalled that the reason for the partial annulment of the contested Regulation was that the Commission and the Council should have taken account of the fact that line 74 of the 2008 tax return of the company concerned had been revised.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bil razlog za delno razglasitev ničnosti izpodbijane uredbe ta, da bi morala Komisija in Svet upoštevati dejstvo, da je bila vrstica 74 napovedi za odmero davka za davčno leto 2008 zadevne družbe revidirana.
Within the applicable deadline for submitting comments, the company concerned commented that following the General Court judgment, the definitive countervailing duty for imports into the Union of certain polyethylene terephthalate originating in Pakistan should be reduced by 1,02 %.
V ustreznem roku za predložitev pripomb je zadevna družba, podala pripombo, da bi po sodbi Splošnega sodišča dokončno izravnalno dajatev za uvoz v Unijo nekaterih vrst polietilen tereftalata s poreklom iz Pakistana bilo treba zmanjšati za 1,02 %.
Novatex further stated that the countervailing duty applicable to Novatex should be set at 4,1 % or EUR 35,39 per tonne as from 1 June 2010 (the alleged date of entry into force of the provisional duty).
Družba Novatex je nadalje navedla, da bi izravnalno dajatev, ki se uporablja za družbo Novatex, bilo treba določiti na višini 4,1 % oziroma 35,39 EUR na tono od 1. junija 2010 (domnevni datum začetka veljavnosti začasne dajatve).
No further comments of any substance on the partial re-opening were received.
V zvezi z delno obnovo ni bila prejeta nobena dodatna bistvena pripomba.