natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See also the 2004 Report, Hlavačka S, Wágner R, Riesberg A.
Na podlagi zdravstvenega zavarovanja imajo državljani pravico do brezplačnega zdravstvenega varstva in medicinske opreme pod zakonsko določenimi pogoji.“
‘Health care systems in transition: Slovakia’ (Vol.
Zlasti je treba poudariti, da je Slovaška republika v povezavi z zakonodajnimi spremembami, sprejetimi leta 2004, poravnala dolg v višini skoraj 1 milijarde EUR, ki je prej bremenil zdravstveni sektor, vključno z dolgovi zasebnih zdravstvenih zavarovalnic (glede na informacije, ki so jih slovaški organi predložili Komisiji 9. julija 2010).
6 No 10 2004), p. 36 ff., issued by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (available at http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/95938/E85396.pdf), in particular p. 99.
Glej sprotno opombo 4.
In accordance with Section 3 of Act No 580/2004, a natural person permanently resident in the Slovak Republic must be insured under the public health insurance system.
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 1408/71 z dne 14. junija 1971 o uporabi sistemov socialne varnosti za zaposlene osebe, samozaposlene osebe in njihove družinske člane, ki se gibljejo v Skupnosti (UL L 149, 5.7.1971, str. 2).
The law provides for exceptions, but only for those who have health insurance in another country.
Uredba (ES) št. 883/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti (UL L 166, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
That Section 3 also defines which persons must be insured under the public health insurance system even if they are not permanently resident in the Slovak Republic.
Glej tudi oddelek 6(9) akta št. 580/2004.
In this Decision, the term ‘Slovak resident’ refers, as appropriate, to all categories of persons which must be insured under the public health insurance system.
Del 3 akta št. 580/2004.
See also the 2011 Report, Szalay T, Pažitný P, Szalayová A, Frisová S, Morvay K, Petrovič M and van Ginneken E., ‘Slovakia: Health system review.
Glej uvodne izjave 45 do 47.
Health Systems in Transition’ (Vol.
Glej akt št. 577/2004.
13 No 2 2011), issued by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (available at http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/140593/e94972.pdf), p. 78.
Npr. razmerja med zavarovano osebo in zdravstveno zavarovalnico ne ureja pogodba, temveč zakon (glej oddelek 4 akta št. 580/2004).
Act No 352/2005, i.e. for people without permanent residence and not employed in Slovakia, and those with permanent residence in Slovakia but health insurance abroad.
Tudi nadzor nad zdravstvenimi zavarovalnicami in zagotavljanjem zdravstvenih storitev ureja zakon.
According to the reply by the Slovak authorities to the opening decision, this possibility of voluntary insurance was abolished with effect from 1 May 2010 by Act No 121/2010.
Ti ukrepi so natančneje opisani v sklepu o začetku postopka, uvodne izjave (44) do (72).
These conditions are: (1) mandatory use of profit for formation of a reserve up to the level of 20 % of paid-up registered capital (the reserve fund may only be used to cover loss); and (2) mandatory formation of technical reserves for payment of planned healthcare for insured persons on waiting lists.
SZP je kot javna ustanova pred 1. majem 2005 delovala kot zavarovalnica s posebnim in sorazmerno omejenim zavarovalnim portfeljem, medtem ko je bila v nasprotju z drugimi zdravstvenimi zavarovalnicami zavezana, da zavarovanim osebam krije tudi posebno preventivno zdravstveno oskrbo in posebne zdravstvene storitve, ki se zagotavljajo v zvezi s poškodbami pri delu in poklicnimi boleznimi.
Infringement No 2008/4268 in which the European Commission sent to the Slovak government a letter of formal notice under internal market rules, observing that the prohibition on health insurance companies to freely dispose of any profits resulting from the provision of public health insurance in Slovakia under Section 15(6) of Act No 581/2004 constitutes an unjustified restriction on the freedom of capital movements guaranteed by Article 63 of the Treaty.
Veriteľ, a. s. je bila ustanovljena v skladu z Resolucijo slovaške vlade št. 262 z dne 2. aprila 2003.
The Permanent Court of Arbitration has recently declined jurisdiction over the claims by Dutch company Achmea (the owner of Union Health Insurance) against these plans, see Achmea v the Slovak Republic, PCA Case No 2013-12, ruling of 24 May 2014, available on: http://news.achmea.nl/achmea-discloses-awards-of-arbitration-tribunals/
Glej poročilo iz leta 2011: Szalay T., Pažitný P., Szalayová A., Frisová S., Morvay K., Petrovič M. in van Ginneken E.: „Slovakia: Health system review.
See http://spectator.sme.sk/articles/view/54162/3/achmea_loses_against_slovakia.html
Health Systems in Transition“ (Slovaška: Pregled zdravstvenega sistema.
Figures over 2011-2013 were provided by the complainant in its comments to the opening decision.
Zdravstveni sistemi v prehodu) (zv.
See also paragraph 37 of the ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration of 24 May 2014 in PCA Case No 2013-12, Achmea v Slovak Republic (see footnote 9 above).
13, št. 2, 2011), ki ga je izdal Evropski observatorij za zdravstvene sisteme in politike (objavljeno na http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/140593/e94972.pdf), str. 142.
Opening decision, recitals 23 and 24.
Po mnenju pritožnice so bili dolgovi predhodnikov Dôvere, ki so bili skupaj obsežnejši od SZP, v nasprotju poravnani le v znesku 27,25 milijona EUR.
The obligation to be insured is specified by law for all defined persons (Section 3 of Act No 580/2004).
Po mnenju pritožnice, ki se sklicuje na poročilo Report on Inquiry into the Activities of Veriteľ, a. s.
All citizens specified by law are legally required to pay public health insurance contributions (Section 11 of Act No 580/2004).
Throughout its Existence (Poročilo o preiskavi dejavnosti Veriteľ, a. s. vse od njene ustanovitve), slovaško ministrstvo za finance, september 2007.
Non-payment of contributions is classified as a criminal offence.
Za več informacij o izravnalni shemi glej uvodne izjave (60) do (67) sklepa o začetku postopka.
Article 40 of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic, among the constitutionally guaranteed ‘fundamental rights and freedoms’, stipulates: ‘Everyone has a right to the protection of his health.
Zadeva T-347/09, Nemčija proti Komisiji, 12. september 2013, še ni objavljeno.
Based on health insurance, citizens have the right to free healthcare and to medical supplies under conditions defined by law.’
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark, Recueil 2003, str.
Specifically, in conjunction with the legislative changes adopted in 2004, the Slovak Republic discharged debts of almost EUR 1 billion, which had previously been incurred by the health sector, including the debts of privately-owned health insurance companies (according to the information provided by the Slovak authorities to the Commission on 9 July 2010).
I-7747.
See footnote 4.
Zlasti združeni zadevi C-159/91 in C-160/91, Poucet in Pistre; zadeva C-218/00, Cisal in INAIL; združene zadeve C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 in C-355/01, AOK Bundesverband.
Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p. 2).
Preiskava, ki jo je opravil Protimonopolni urad Republike Slovaške v povezavi s predlagano združitvijo SZP in VZP in je bila končana 3. decembra 2009; glej tudi letno poročilo 2009 Protimonopolnega urada Republike Slovaške, objavljeno na http://www.antimon.gov.sk/data/att/958.pdf.
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
Glej npr. združene zadeve C-180/98 do C-184/98, Pavlov in drugi, Recueil 2000, str.
See also Section 6(9) of Act No 580/2004.
I-6451, točka 74.
Part 3 of Act No 580/2004
Zadeva 118/85, Komisija proti Italiji, Recueil 1987, str. 2599, točka 7; zadeva C-35/96, Komisija proti Italiji, Recueil 1998, str.
See below, recitals 45 to 47.
I-3851, točka 36; združene zadeve C-180/98 do C-184/98, Pavlov in drugi, točka 75.
See Act No 577/2004.
Združeni zadevi C-159/91 in C-160/91, Poucet in Pistre, Recueil 1993, str.
E.g. the relationship between the insured person and the health insurer is formed not by contract but by law (see Section 4 of Act No 580/2004).
I-637.
The supervision of health insurance companies and healthcare provision are also governed by law.
Glej tudi sporočilo Komisije o uporabi pravil Evropske unije o državni pomoči za nadomestilo, dodeljeno za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporočilo SSGP 2012), UL C 8, 11.1.2012, str. 5, odstavek 12.
The measures are described in more detail in the opening decision, recitals 44 to 72.
Komisija je povzela ustrezno sodno prakso Sodišča v zvezi z uporabo teh pravil za financiranje shem socialne varnosti in zdravstvenega varstva v svojem sporočilu iz leta 2012 o uporabi pravil Evropske unije o državni pomoči za nadomestilo, dodeljeno za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporočilo SSGP 2012).
As a public institution prior to 1 May 2005, SZP functioned as an insurance company with a specific and relatively restricted insurance portfolio, while, as opposed to other health insurers, it was also obligated to its policyholders to cover specific preventive healthcare and specific healthcare provided in connection with work-related injuries and occupational diseases.
Združeni zadevi C-159/91 in C-160/91, Poucet in Pistre, Recueil 1993, str.
Veriteľ, a. s. was established under the Slovak Government's Resolution No 262 of 2 April 2003.
I-637, točka 13.
See the 2011 Report, Szalay T, Pažitný P, Szalayová A, Frisová S, Morvay K, Petrovič M and van Ginneken E., ‘Slovakia: Health system review.
Zadeva C-218/00, Cisal in INAIL, Recueil 2002, str.
Health Systems in Transition’ (Vol.
I-691, točka 45.
13 No 2 2011), issued by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (available at http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/140593/e94972.pdf), p. 142.
Združene zadeve C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 in C-355/01, AOK Bundesverband, Recueil 2004, str.
According to the complainant, Dôvera's predecessors, by comparison, which were jointly larger in size than SZP saw their debts discharged by an amount of EUR 27,25 million only.
I-2493, točke 47 do 55.
According to the complainant, quoting from the Report on Inquiry into the Activities of Veriteľ, a. s.
Združeni zadevi C-159/91 in C-160/91, Poucet in Pistre (navedeno zgoraj), točke 15 do 18.
Throughout its Existence, Slovak Ministry of Finance, September 2007.
Zadeva C-218/00, Cisal in INAIL (navedeno zgoraj), točka 40.
See recitals 60 to 67 of the opening decision for more details on the RES.
Združeni zadevi C-159/91 in C-160/91, Poucet in Pistre (navedeno zgoraj), točka 14; zadeva C-218/00, Cisal in INAIL (navedeno zgoraj), točke 43 do 48; združene zadeve C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 in C-355/01, AOK Bundesverband (navedeno zgoraj), točke 51 do 55.
Case T-347/09, Germany v Commission, 12 September 2013, not yet published.
Zadeva C-67/96, Albany, Recueil 1999, str.
Case C-280/00 Altmark [2003] ECR I-7747.
I-5751, točke 80 do 87.
In particular Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Poucet and Pistre; Case C-218/00 Cisal and INAIL; Joined Cases C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 and C-355/01 AOK Bundesverband.
Zadeva C-244/94, FFSA in drugi (navedeno zgoraj), točka 9 in 17 do 20; zadeva C-67/96, Albany (navedeno zgoraj), točke 81 do 85; glej tudi združene zadeve C 115/97 do C 117/97, Brentjens, Recueil 1999, str.
Investigation performed by the Antimonopoly Office in connection to the proposed merger between SZP and VZP, completed on 3 December 2009; see also the 2009 annual report of the Antimonopoly Office available at http://www.antimon.gov.sk/data/att/958.pdf
I-6025, točke 81 do 85, zadeva C 219/97, Drijvende Bokken, Recueil 1999, str.
Case 118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599, paragraph 7; Case C-35/96 Commission v Italy [1998] ECR I-3851, paragraph 36; Joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavlov and Others, paragraph 75.
Združene zadeve C 115/97 do C 117/97, Brentjens (navedene zgoraj).
Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Poucet and Pistre [1993] ECR I-637.
Združene zadeve C-180/98 do C-184/98, Pavlov in drugi (navedene zgoraj).
See also the communication from the Commission on the application of the European Union State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest (‘2012 SGEI-Communication’) ( OJ C 8, 11.1.2012, p.
Glej npr. tehtanje, ki ga je Sodišče opravilo v zadevi C-350/07, Kattner Stahlbau, ZOdl.
5), point 12.
2009, str.
The Commission has summarised the relevant case-law of the CJEU with regard to the application of these rules to the financing of social security and healthcare schemes in its 2012 Communication on the application of the European Union State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest (‘2012 SGEI-Communication’).
I-1513, zlasti točke 33 do 68.
Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Poucet and Pistre [1993] ECR I-637, paragraph 13.
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba poudariti tudi, da nedavna sodba (T-347/09, Nemčija proti Komisiji, sodba z dne 12. septembra 2013, še ni objavljena), na katero se Dôvera sklicuje v pripombah v zvezi s sklepom o začetku postopka, potrjuje le dejstvo, da lahko blago in storitve na trgu ponujajo tudi nepridobitne organizacije (glej tudi sporočilo SSGP 2012, odstavek 9, ki se sklicuje na sodno prakso).
Case C-218/00 Cisal and INAIL [2002] ECR I-691, paragraph 45.
Vendar to ne spremeni dejstva, da mora določitev gospodarske ali negospodarske narave dejavnosti v danem primeru temeljiti na prisotnosti vsake značilnosti in tehtanju njihove pomembnosti.
Joined Cases C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 and C-355/01 AOK Bundesverband [2004] ECR I-2493, paragraphs 47 to 55.
Glej uvodne izjave 23 do 25.
Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Poucet and Pistre (cited above), paragraphs 15 to 18.
Glej uvodne izjave 26 do 29.
Case C-218/00 Cisal and INAIL (cited above), paragraph 40.
Glej uvodno izjavo 32.
Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Poucet and Pistre (cited above), paragraph 14; Case C-218/00 Cisal and INAIL (cited above), paragraphs 43-48; Joined Cases C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 and C-355/01 AOK Bundesverband (cited above), paragraphs 51-55.
Slovaški sistem obveznega zdravstvenega zavarovanja ima podobne značilnosti kot nemški zakonski sistem javnega zdravstvenega zavarovanja, kot je ocenilo Sodišče v združenih zadevah C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 in C-355/01, AOK Bundesverband.
Case C-67/96 Albany [1999] ECR I-5751, paragraphs 80-87.
Glej tudi zadevo C-350/07, Kattner Stahlbau (navedeno zgoraj, točka 53, in zlasti sklepne predloge generalnega pravobranilca Mazáka v tej zadevi (točka 59).
Case C-244/94 FFSA and Others (cited above), paragraphs 9 and 17 to 20; Case C-67/96 Albany (cited above), paragraphs 81 to 85; see also Joined Cases C 115/97 to C 117/97 Brentjens [1999] ECR I 6025, paragraphs 81 to 85, Case C 219/97 Drijvende Bokken [1999] ECR I 6121, paragraphs 71 to 75, and Joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavlov (cited above), paragraphs 114 and 115.
V zvezi s tem Komisija opozarja, da dejstvo. da so nemške zdravstvene zavarovalnice v zadevi AOK (združene zadeve C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 in C-355/01, AOK Bundesverband) sploh izvajale določeno stopnjo cenovne konkurence v smislu spreminjanja stopnje prispevkov zavarovanih oseb, ni postavilo pod vprašaj ugotovitve Sodišča, da niso izvajale gospodarske dejavnosti.
Joined Cases C 115/97 to C 117/97 Brentjens (cited above).
Po mnenju Sodišča je bil element konkurence na področju prispevkov uveden za to, da bi zdravstvene zavarovalnice spodbudil k temu, da svoje dejavnosti opravljajo po načelih dobrega upravljanja, to je najučinkoviteje in stroškovno najceneje, v interesu dobrega delovanja nemškega sistema socialne varnosti.
Joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavlov and Others (cited above).
Po mnenju Sodišča uresničevanje tega cilja ne spreminja ničesar glede narave dejavnosti zdravstvenih zavarovalnic (glej točko 56 navedene sodbe).
However, this does not change the fact that the conclusion as to the economic or non-economic nature of the activity in a given case has to be based on the presence and weighing of the respective importance of each of the different elements.
Tudi glede na glavni cilj (učinkovitosti) reforme iz uvodne izjave 13.
See recitals 23 to 25.
Slovaški organi so z dopisom z dne 25. marca 2010 zahtevali podaljšanje roka za odgovor na to zahtevo, kar je Komisija odobrila z dopisom z dne 31. marca 2010.
See recital 32.
Dôvera je z dopisom z dne 15. julija 2011 predložila dodatne informacije o naravi sektorja zdravstvenega zavarovanja na Slovaškem in razširila obseg pritožbe, tako da je vključila tri nove ukrepe, ki so bili domnevno dodeljeni v korist SZP in VZP: (i) poravnava dolga SZP s strani državnega podjetja Veriteľ a. s. leta 2004 in 2005, in sicer v dveh plačilih v višini 52,7 milijona EUR in 28 milijonov EUR, (ii) subvencija v višini 7,6 milijona EUR, ki jo je ministrstvo za zdravje leta 2006 dodelilo SZP, ter (iii) dokapitalizacija VZP 1. januarja 2010 v višini 65,1 milijona EUR, ki jo je financirala država.
The features of the Slovak compulsory health insurance system are similar to the German statutory public health insurance system assessed by the CJEU in Joined Cases C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 and C-355/01 AOK Bundesverband.
Zato je Komisija pozvala slovaške organe, naj predložijo pripombe v zvezi s pritožbo, razširjeno z novimi trditvami.
The CJEU considered the German system to be of non-economic nature a nd noted in particular that the German sickness funds were compelled by law to offer to their members essentially identical obligatory benefits fixed by the State which did not depend on the amount of the contributions paid by the insured persons, were therefore not in competition with one another as regards the grant of obligatory statutory benefits and were engaged in a system of risk equalisation (see, paragraphs 52 to 54 of that judgment).
Slovaški organi so z dopisom z dne 24. julija 2013 zahtevali podaljšanje roka za predložitev pripomb v zvezi s sklepom o začetku postopka, ki ga je Komisija odobrila z dopisom z dne 30. julija 2013.
In this respect, the Commission recalls that the fact that the German sickness funds in the AOK case (Joined Cases C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 and C-355/01 AOK Bundesverband) were even engaged in some price competition through a certain scope to vary the contribution rates of affiliates did not call into question the finding of the Court that they were not involved in an economic activity.
Te pripombe so bile posredovane slovaškim organom z dopisom a z dne 20. novembra in 20. decembra 2013.
According to the CJEU, the pursuit of that objective does not in any way change the nature of the sickness funds' activity (see paragraph 56 of that judgment).
V drugi polovici leta 2006 je ministrstvo za zdravje odobrilo SZP dodatno subvencijo z uporabo dela likvidacijske bilance Veriteľ, ki je bila julija 2006 razpuščena.
By letter of 27 August 2013, the Slovak Republic submitted its observations on the opening decision.
Ko je ministrstvo za zdravje razglasilo, da je bilo to zadnje reševanje zdravstvenega sistema z javnimi sredstvi, je bila Veriteľ leta 2006 razpuščena [28].
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/249
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/249
(notified under document C(2015) 603)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2015) 603)
The validity of Decision 2006/502/EC was extended by 1-year periods, firstly by Commission Decision 2007/231/EC [3] until 11 May 2008, secondly by Commission Decision 2008/322/EC [4] until 11 May 2009, thirdly by Commission Decision 2009/298/EC [5] until 11 May 2010, fourthly by Commission Decision 2010/157/EU [6] until 11 May 2011, fifthly by Commission Decision 2011/176/EU [7] until 11 May 2012, sixthly by Commission Implementing Decision 2012/53/EU [8] until 11 May 2013, seventhly by Commission Implementing Decision 2013/113/EU [9] until 11 May 2014 and eighthly by Commission Implementing Decision 2014/61/EU [10] until 11 May 2015.
Veljavnost Odločbe 2006/502/ES se je podaljševala za enoletna obdobja, in sicer prvič z Odločbo Komisije 2007/231/ES [3] do 11. maja 2008, drugič z Odločbo Komisije 2008/322/ES [4] do 11. maja 2009, tretjič z Odločbo Komisije 2009/298/ES [5] do 11. maja 2010, četrtič s Sklepom Komisije 2010/157/EU [6] do 11. maja 2011, petič s Sklepom Komisije 2011/176/EU [7] do 11. maja 2012, šestič z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2012/53/EU [8] do 11. maja 2013, sedmič z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2013/113/EU [9] do 11. maja 2014 in osmič z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2014/61/EU [10] do 11. maja 2015.
This Decision shall apply until 11 May 2016.’
Ta odločba se uporablja do 11. maja 2016.“
Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with this Decision by 11 May 2015 at the latest and shall publish those measures.
Države članice najpozneje do 11. maja 2015 sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s tem sklepom, in jih objavijo.
They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.
O tem nemudoma obvestijo Komisijo.
OJ L 198, 20.7.2006, p. 41.
UL L 198, 20.7.2006, str. 41.
OJ L 99, 14.4.2007, p. 16.
UL L 99, 14.4.2007, str. 16.
OJ L 109, 19.4.2008, p. 40.
UL L 109, 19.4.2008, str. 40.
OJ L 81, 27.3.2009, p. 23.
UL L 81, 27.3.2009, str. 23.
OJ L 67, 17.3.2010, p. 9.
UL L 67, 17.3.2010, str. 9.
OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 99.
UL L 76, 22.3.2011, str. 99.
OJ L 27, 31.1.2012, p. 24.
UL L 27, 31.1.2012, str. 24.
OJ L 61, 5.3.2013, p. 11.
UL L 61, 5.3.2013, str. 11.
OJ L 38, 7.2.2014, p. 43.
UL L 38, 7.2.2014, str. 43.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/250
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/250
of 13 February 2015
z dne 13. februarja 2015
amending Annexes I and II to Decision 2004/558/EC as regards the infectious bovine rhinotracheitis-free status of the Federal States of Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, Brandenburg, Berlin and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania in Germany
o spremembi prilog I in II k Odločbi 2004/558/ES v zvezi s statusom nemških zveznih dežel Saška, Saška – Anhalt, Brandenburg, Berlin in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern kot prostih infekcioznega bovinega rinotraheitisa
(notified under document C(2015) 706)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2015) 706)
Article 9 thereof provides that where a Member State has a compulsory national control programme for one of the contagious diseases listed in Annex E(II) thereto, it may submit its programme to the Commission for approval.
Člen 9 določa, da lahko država članica, ki ima obvezen nacionalni nadzorni program za eno od nalezljivih bolezni iz Priloge E(II) k navedeni direktivi, predloži svoj program Komisiji v odobritev.
Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis is the description of the most prominent clinical signs of the infection with the bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BHV1).
Infekciozni bovini rinotraheitis je opis najvidnejših kliničnih znakov okužbe z bovinim herpesvirusom tipa 1 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: BHV1).
Commission Decision 2004/558/EC [2] approves the programmes for the control and eradication of BHV1 presented by the Member States listed in Annex I thereto for the regions listed in that Annex and for which additional guarantees apply in accordance with Article 9 of Directive 64/432/EEC.
Z Odločbo Komisije 2004/558/ES [2] so bili odobreni programi za nadzor in izkoreninjenje BHV1, ki so jih predložile države članice iz Priloge I k navedeni odločbi za regije iz navedene priloge, za katere veljajo dodatna jamstva v skladu s členom 9 Direktive 64/432/EGS.
In addition, Annex II to Decision 2004/558/EC lists the regions of the Member States that are considered free of BHV1 and to which additional guarantees apply in accordance with Article 10 of Directive 64/432/EEC.
Poleg tega Priloga II k Odločbi 2004/558/ES navaja regije držav članic, za katere se šteje, da so proste okužbe z BHV1 in za katere veljajo dodatna jamstva v skladu s členom 10 Direktive 64/432/EGS.