natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where warranted, the comments were taken into account and led to a slight revision of the dumping margin of the companies concerned.
Utemeljene pripombe so se upoštevale, zato so bile stopnje dampinga zadevnih družb nekoliko spremenjene.
In the absence of any other comments regarding export price, all determinations in recitals (87) to (89) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z izvozno ceno, se vse ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (87) do (89) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following the provisional disclosure, some of the sampled exporters commented on minor issues concerning the allowances used to compare export prices.
Po začasnem razkritju so nekateri vzorčeni izvozniki predložili pripombe v zvezi z manj pomembnimi vprašanji glede prilagoditve, ki so se uporabile pri primerjavi izvoznih cen.
Following the provisional disclosure, a clerical error resulting in an incorrect adjustment to Normal Value for domestic freight was discovered.
Po začasnem razkritju je bila odkrita stvarna napaka, zaradi katere je bila prilagoditev normalne vrednosti za domači prevoz nepravilna.
This error was corrected and led to a slight decrease in dumping margins.
Ta napaka je bila popravljena, zato so se stopnje dampinga nekoliko znižale.
Following disclosure, one interested party claimed that an adjustment for level of trade may be warranted, since the party does not sell directly to installers, but to resellers and distributors.
Po razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran trdila, da je prilagoditev ravni trgovine lahko upravičena, saj zainteresirana stran ne prodaja neposredno monterjem, temveč posrednikom in distributerjem.
The party requested detailed information on the sales channels of the analogue country producer, which could not be provided to protect confidential information.
Zainteresirana stran je zahtevala podrobne informacije o prodajnih poteh proizvajalca iz primerljive države, ki niso bile predložene zaradi varstva zaupnih informacij.
As an alternative, the customer base of the analogue country producer was categorized into different categories according to sales volume, which showed that a level of trade adjustment was not warranted.
Zato so bile stranke proizvajalca iz primerljive države razvrščene v različne kategorije glede na obseg prodaje, kar je pokazalo, da prilagoditev ravni trgovine ni bila upravičena.
In response to this analysis, the interested party admitted that a difference in sales quantities would result in price differences, but maintained their argument that they would allegedly charge higher prices to installers than distributors/resellers even if the installer would buy a similar quantity than the distributor/reseller.
V odgovoru na to analizo je zainteresirana stran priznala, da bi bile posledica razlik v obsegu prodaje razlike v cenah, vendar še vedno trdila, da bi se zaračunale višje cene za monterje kot za distributerje/posrednike, tudi če bi monterji kupili podobno količino kot distributerji/posredniki.
However, this claim was not substantiated and could therefore not be taken into account.
Vendar ta trditev ni bila utemeljena in je zato ni bilo mogoče upoštevati.
In the absence of any other comment regarding export price, all determinations in recitals (90) to (92) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z izvozno ceno, se vse ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (90) do (92) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One sampled exporting producer requested a full disclosure of its dumping calculations, claiming that it could otherwise not comment on the accuracy thereof.
En vzorčeni proizvajalec izvoznik je zahteval popolno razkritje svojih izračunov dampinga in trdil, da drugače ne more predložiti pripomb o njihovi točnosti.
As this company was not granted MET, its normal value was based on data from India as analogue country.
Ker tej družbi TGO ni bila dodeljena, je njena normalna vrednost temeljila na podatkih Indije kot primerljive države.
Given that only one producer in the analogue country fully co-operated in the investigation, information from the analogue country cannot be disclosed on a product type level in order to protect confidential information.
Ker je v primerljivi državi v tej preiskavi v celoti sodeloval le en proizvajalec, zaradi varstva zaupnih informacij ni mogoče razkriti informacij primerljive države o ravni vrste izdelka.
Therefore, the claim needs to be rejected.
Zato je treba to trditev zavrniti.
Accordingly, that margin was established on the basis of the margins established for the sampled exporting producers.
V skladu s tem je bila ta stopnja določena na podlagi stopenj, ugotovljenih za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike.
On that basis, the definitive dumping margin for the cooperating companies not included in the sample was established at 88,1 %.
Na podlagi tega je bila dokončna stopnja dampinga za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec, določena na 88,1 %.
To that end the level of cooperation was first established by comparing the volume of exports to the Union reported by the cooperating exporting producers with the volume of Chinese exports, as established in recital (167).
V ta namen je bila raven sodelovanja najprej ugotovljena s primerjavo obsega izvoza v Unijo, ki so ga prijavili sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, z obsegom kitajskega izvoza, kot je določen v uvodni izjavi (167).
As the cooperation accounted for more than 80 % of total Chinese exports to the Union, the level of cooperation can be considered high.
Sodelujoče družbe so pomenile več kot 80 % celotnega kitajskega izvoza v Unijo, zato se lahko šteje, da je bila raven sodelovanja visoka.
This was considered appropriate since there were no indications that the non- cooperating companies were dumping at a lower level, and in order to ensure the effectiveness of any measure.
To se je štelo za primerno, ker ni bilo dokazov, da je stopnja dampinga nesodelujočih družb nižja, in da bi se zagotovila učinkovitost vseh ukrepov.
Other cooperating companies (Annex I, Annex II)
Druge sodelujoče družbe (Priloga i, Priloga II)
The like product was manufactured by around 215 producers in the Union.
Podobni izdelek je proizvajalo približno 215 proizvajalcev Unije.
The Institutions have verified claims by interested parties that there was a higher number; this verification has revealed that the alleged additional producers were in reality mostly exporting producers, importers related to those, distributors and installers.
Institucije so preverile trditve zainteresiranih strani, da je število večje; pri preverjanju se je razkrilo, da so bili domnevni dodatni proizvajalci v resnici proizvajalci izvozniki, z njimi povezani uvozniki, distributerji in monterji.
Following the provisional disclosure, several parties contested the fact that data provided by Europressedienst, an independent consultancy firm (‘the consultant’), were used to determine, inter alia, Union production, Union production capacity as well as other macroeconomic injury indicators concerning the Union industry and import data.
Po začasnem razkritju je več strani nasprotovalo dejstvu, da so bili podatki, ki jih je zagotovilo neodvisno svetovalno podjetje Europressedienst („svetovalec“), med drugim uporabljeni za določitev proizvodnje Unije, proizvodne zmogljivosti Unije in drugih makroekonomskih kazalnikov škode v zvezi z industrijo Unije in podatkov o uvozu.
These parties questioned the independence of the consultant alleging that it was linked to the complainant.
Te strani so dvomile v neodvisnost svetovalca in trdile, da je povezan s pritožnikom.
They also requested clarifications on what basis the consultant was selected by the Commission and questioned its expertise in collecting economic data related to the PV sector.
Zahtevale so tudi pojasnila glede podlage, na kateri je Komisija izbrala svetovalca, in izrazile dvom o njegovi strokovnosti pri zbiranju gospodarskih podatkov v zvezi s fotonapetostnim sektorjem.
In this regard, it was claimed that the Commission should have based its findings on data from other available sources, in particular known research institutes.
V zvezi s tem se je trdilo, da bi morala Komisija svoje ugotovitve utemeljiti s podatki iz drugih razpoložljivih virov, zlasti znanih raziskovalnih inštitutov.
Lastly, a reference to Best Practices for the submission of economic evidence and data collection in cases concerning the application of Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and in merger cases was made by AFASE to contest the reliability of the data submitted by the consultant.
Nazadnje se je združenje AFASE sklicevalo na dokument o dobrih praksah za predložitev gospodarskih dokazov in zbiranje podatkov v primerih, ki so povezani z uporabo členov 101 in 102 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), in v primeru združitve ter s tem izpodbijalo zanesljivost podatkov, ki jih je predložil svetovalec.
As regards the alleged links between the consultant and the complainant, the relevant interested parties did not submit any evidence showing the existence of such links.
Glede domnevne povezave med svetovalcem in pritožnikom zadevne zainteresirane strani niso predložile dokazov, da takšna povezava obstaja.
Likewise, the investigation did not bring into light any evidence of a relationship going beyond purely commercial character.
Poleg tega preiskava ni pokazala, da med njima obstaja odnos, ki presega izključno komercialni značaj.
Following final disclosure one interested party claimed that there were indications that the prima facie evidence provided by the complainant Union industry in the complaint were based on data provided by the same consultant.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran trdila, da so obstajali znaki, da so dokazi prima facie, ki jih je v pritožbi predložil pritožnik, industrija Unije, temeljili na podatkih, ki jih je zagotovil isti svetovalec.
Even though it is acknowledged that findings for some indicators were indeed similar to the evidence provided in the complaint that does not necessarily mean that they were established on the basis of one source only.
Čeprav se priznava, da so bile ugotovitve za nekatere kazalnike dejansko podobne dokazom, predloženim v pritožbi, to še ne pomeni nujno, da so bile oblikovane na podlagi samo enega vira.
In this regard, the complaint provides the various sources used.
V zvezi s tem so v pritožbi navedeni različni uporabljeni viri.
As explained in recital (99) to the provisional Regulation, the Commission considered it appropriate to make use of this consultancy in the current investigation, due to the unavailability from other public sources of the necessary macro-economic data covering the total Union market as well as import data.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (99) začasne uredbe, je Komisija menila, da je v sedanji preiskavi primerno uporabiti to svetovalno podjetje zaradi nerazpoložljivosti potrebnih makroekonomskih podatkov, ki se nanašajo na celoten trg Unije, in uvoznih podatkov iz drugih javnih virov.
Prior to selecting Europressedienst the Commission assessed the methodology used by the consultant for the collection of the relevant data as well as the consultant's ability to provide the necessary data separately for all product types and for the entire period considered.
Komisija je pred izbiro podjetja Europressedienst ocenila metodologijo, ki jo svetovalec uporablja za zbiranje ustreznih podatkov, ter njegovo zmožnost, da zagotovi potrebne podatke za vsako posamezno vrsto izdelka in za celotno obravnavano obdobje.
Furthermore, during the investigation, data provided by the consultant were counter checked when possible with other available sources and were confirmed.
Poleg tega so se podatki, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec, med preiskavo navzkrižno preverjali z drugimi razpoložljivimi viri, če je bilo to mogoče, in so bili potrjeni.
In this respect, it is noted that several research companies specialised in collecting PV statistics exist on the market and the figures reported are almost never identical.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da na trgu obstaja več raziskovalnih podjetij, specializiranih za zbiranje statističnih podatkov o fotonapetostnem sektorju, in da vrednosti, ki jih sporočajo, skoraj nikoli niso enake.
This is due to the fact that precise figures are difficult to derive for any research institute and therefore the reported PV market indicators will always be based on estimates, independently of the provider of such figure.
To je posledica dejstva, da raziskovalni inštituti težko izračunajo natančne številke, zato sporočeni kazalniki fotonapetostnega trga vedno temeljijo na ocenah, neodvisno od tega, kdo te številke sporoči.
In this context, the cross-checking exercise carried out by the Commission consisted of comparing the trends of the data received from the consultant with the trends of the same data published by other research companies, the Commission's Joint Research Center (‘JRC’) and the European Photovoltaic Industry Association (‘EPIA’) on the same topics, when available.
V zvezi s tem je navzkrižno preverjanje, ki ga je izvedla Komisija, vključevalo primerjavo trendov podatkov, prejetih od svetovalca, s trendi razpoložljivih enakih podatkov, ki so jih o istih temah objavila druga raziskovalna podjetja, Skupni raziskovalni center (Joint Research Center – „JRC“) Komisije in Evropsko industrijsko združenje za fotovoltaiko (European Photovoltaic Industry Association – „EPIA“).
No significant differences were noticed as a result of the cross-checking exercise as the trends of the indicators for which the cross-checking was done were similar.
Navzkrižno preverjanje ni razkrilo nobenih pomembnih razlik, saj so bili trendi kazalnikov, vključenih v navzkrižno preverjanje, podobni.
Provisional findings were therefore not solely based on data provided by the consultant but also on the Commission's own analysis and assessment of these data.
Torej začasne ugotovitve niso temeljile le na podatkih, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec, ampak tudi na analizi Komisije in njeni presoji teh podatkov.
In addition, as mentioned above in recital (9), after the imposition of provisional measures a verification visit took place at the premises of the consultant.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (9), je Komisija po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov opravila tudi preveritveni obisk v prostorih svetovalca.
The Commission carried out the on-the-spot check at the consultant's premises to verify the reliability of the methodology and data supplied.
Komisija je opravila pregled na kraju samem v prostorih svetovalca, da bi preverila zanesljivost metodologije in predloženih podatkov.
The on-the-spot check was carried out as a follow-up of the cross-checking of the data by the Commission and to obtain further assurance as regards the reliability and quality of the data and related methodology.
Pregled na kraju samem je bil opravljen kot nadaljnji ukrep po navzkrižnem preverjanju podatkov s strani Komisije, da bi se pridobila dodatna zagotovila glede zanesljivosti in kakovosti podatkov in povezane metodologije.
The on-the-spot verification was considered appropriate in application of the principle of good administration, even if those data were not provided by an interested party but by a consultant.
Preveritev na kraju samem se je štela za primerno za uporabo načela dobrega upravljanja, tudi če navedenih podatkov ni predložila zainteresirana stran, ampak svetovalec.
As a result, the Commission was further reassured of the reliability of the data provided by the consultant.
Tako je Komisija dobila dodatna zagotovila glede zanesljivosti podatkov svetovalca.
One party claimed that the methodology of cross checking used by the Commission was not explained in sufficient detail and requested that the other sources used for the cross checking should be disclosed.
Ena stran je trdila, da metodologija navzkrižnega preverjanja, ki jo je uporabila Komisija, ni bila dovolj podrobno pojasnjena, ter zahtevala, da bi bilo treba razkriti druge vire, uporabljene za navzkrižno preverjanje.
This party argued further that the methodology used was in any event invalid insofar that only trends of various sources were compared and not absolute values.
Ta stran je nadalje trdila, da je bila uporabljena metodologija v vsakem primeru neveljavna, ker so bili primerjani samo trendi različnih virov in ne absolutne vrednosti.
As far as the other sources used to cross check the data provided by the consultant are concerned, they were the reports published by the 'JRC and EPIA on the same topics.
Kar zadeva druge vire, uporabljenih za navzkrižni preverjanje podatkov, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec, so to bila poročila, ki sta jih o enakih temah objavila JRC in EPIA.
As for the comparison of data with other sources it is noted that they showed not only similar trends but also similar magnitudes.
Glede primerjave podatkov z drugimi viri je treba poudariti, da ni pokazala samo podobnih trendov, ampak tudi podobne vrednosti.
Therefore, it was concluded that the methodology used was appropriate and the claims in this regard were rejected.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da je bila uporabljena ustrezna metodologija, trditve v zvezi s tem pa so bile zavrnjene.
As to expertise of the consultant, it is noted that its main activity is collecting data linked to the PV sector and developing an up-to-date database of companies active in the PV market.
V zvezi s strokovnostjo svetovalca je treba opozoriti, da je njegova glavna dejavnost zbiranje podatkov, povezanih s fotonapetostnim sektorjem, in razvoj posodobljene baze podatkov družb, ki delujejo na fotonapetostnemu trgu.
These data are published in specialised photovoltaic magazines and also used by individual companies for which it carries out specialised research.
Ti podatki se objavljajo v specializiranih revijah o fotonapetostni industriji in jih uporabljajo tudi posamezne družbe, za katere svetovalec opravlja specializirane raziskave.
The database developed by Europressedienst is regularly up-dated and re-published.
Baza podatkov, ki jo razvija Europressedienst, se redno posodablja in objavlja.
In addition, the consultant has several years of experience in this sector.
Poleg tega ima svetovalec večletne izkušnje v tem sektorju.
More precisely, the methodology of the consultant is to collect, cross-check and agglomerate information using various sources available in the market.
Natančneje, metodologija svetovalca vključuje zbiranje, navzkrižno preverjanje in združevanje informacij z uporabo različnih virov, ki so na voljo na trgu.
To this end, it collects the data via standard questionnaires sent to the companies listed in the database or via phone, especially from the Union producers, or during the specialised fairs, notably from producers in third countries.
V ta namen zbira podatke s pomočjo standardnih vprašalnikov, poslanih družbam, ki so vključene v bazo podatkov, ali prek telefona, zlasti od proizvajalcev Unije, ali pa na specializiranih sejmih, kjer pridobiva podatke zlasti od proizvajalcev iz tretjih držav.
When the information cannot be obtained through the channels just mentioned, Europressedienst checks the financial reports of companies in the photovoltaic sector or co-operates on a freely basis with other research institutes with a view to obtaining or cross-checking the data.
Kadar podatkov ni mogoče pridobiti na navedene načine, Europressedienst preveri računovodska poročila družb v fotonapetostnem sektorju ali pa prosto sodeluje z drugimi raziskovalnimi inštituti, da bi pridobil ali navzkrižno preveril podatke.
It was verified and indeed confirmed that these sources were used by the consultant in its daily activity.
Preverjeno in potrjeno je bilo, da svetovalec te vire uporablja v okviru vsakodnevnih dejavnosti.
In the light of the above, it was considered appropriate to make use of Europressedienst's services in the present investigation and the parties' claims in this respect were therefore rejected.
Glede na navedeno se je štelo za primerno, da se v sedanji preiskavi uporabijo storitve podjetja Europressedienst, trditve strani v zvezi s tem pa so bile zato zavrnjene.
With regard to the Best Practices for the submission of economic evidence issued by the competent service of the Commission (‘the Best Practices’), the following remarks should be made.
V zvezi z dokumentom o dobrih praksah za predložitev gospodarskih dokazov, ki ga je izdala pristojna služba Komisije („Dobre prakse“), je treba pripomniti naslednje.
First of all, it is a document that cannot engage the Commission, as it has not been adopted by the College, but published by the competent service with the purpose of providing recommendations to parties as to how to present economic evidence.
Prvič, to je dokument, ki ne more vključiti Komisije, ker ga ni sprejel kolegij, ampak ga je objavila pristojna služba, da bi stranem zagotovila priporočila za predložitev gospodarskih dokazov.
Secondly, the Best Practices concern the submission of economic analysis and data used in some competition investigations, pursuant to Article 101 and 102 TFEU and in merger cases.
Drugič, dobre prakse se nanašajo na predložitev gospodarske analize in podatkov, ki se uporabljajo v nekaterih preiskavah v zvezi s konkurenco v skladu s členoma 101 in 102 PDEU, in v primerih združitev.
The applicable rules, standards of proof and investigating powers of the Commission in those competition cases cannot be compared to trade defence investigations, to which an entirely different set of rules applies.
Veljavnih pravil, dokaznih standardov in preiskovalnih pristojnosti Komisije v primerih v zvezi s konkurenco ni mogoče primerjati s preiskavami trgovinske zaščite, za katere velja popolnoma drugačen niz pravil.
After the provisional disclosure, several parties contested the methodology used by the consultant claiming that it would not reach recognised scientific standards.
Po začasnem razkritju je več strani nasprotovalo metodologiji, ki jo uporablja svetovalec, in trdilo, da ne dosega priznanih znanstvenih standardov.
However, as mentioned above in recital (137), the methodology was assessed and the resulting data were cross-checked and verified and as a result were considered in line with other published data and therefore reasonably reliable.
Vendar pa je bila metodologija ocenjena, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (137), pridobljeni podatki pa so bili navzkrižno preverjeni, zaradi česar so se šteli za skladne z drugimi objavljenimi podatki in zato za upravičeno zanesljive.
Specific points raised by the interested parties, mainly AFASE were clarified and made available in the open file of the investigation for inspection by interested parties.
Posebna vprašanja, ki so jih izpostavile zainteresirane strani, predvsem združenje AFASE, so bila pojasnjena in dana na voljo v dokumentaciji preiskave, odprti za pregled zainteresiranih strani.
The CCCME argued that the methodology of data aggregation was not clarified.
CCCME je trdil, da metodologija združevanja podatkov ni bila pojasnjena.
This claim was rejected as the relevant information was made available to all interested parties in the investigation file open for inspection by interested parties.
Ta trditev je bila zavrnjena, saj so bile ustrezne informacije dane na voljo vsem zainteresiranim stranem v dokumentaciji preiskave, odprti za pregled zainteresiranih strani.
After final disclosure, several parties reiterated their concerns on the selection of the consultant by the Commission and on the quality of the data supplied.
Po dokončnem razkritju je več strani ponovilo pomisleke glede izbire svetovalca, ki jo je opravila Komisija, in glede kakovosti zagotovljenih podatkov.
In this respect it was claimed that the consultant's data can be ordered and purchased on an ad hoc basis to meet the specifically identified requests of potential clients and may therefore not be objective.
V zvezi s tem so trdile, da je mogoče podatke svetovalca naročiti in kupiti na ad hoc podlagi, da bi se izpolnile posebej opredeljene zahteve potencialnih strank, in da zato morda niso objektivni.