natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The free movement of workers needs to be distinguished from the freedom to provide services, which includes the right of undertakings to provide services in another Member State, for which they may post their own workers to another Member State temporarily in order for them to carry out the work necessary to provide services in that Member State.
Prosto gibanje delavcev je treba razlikovati od svobode opravljanja storitev, ki zajema pravico podjetij do opravljanja storitev v drugi državi članici, pri čemer lahko svoje delavce začasno napotijo v drugo državo članico, da tam opravljajo delo, potrebno za opravljanje storitev v zadevni državi članici.
With respect to Union workers and members of their family exercising their right to free movement, Article 45 TFEU confers substantial rights for the exercise of this fundamental freedom, which are further specified in Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4].
V členu 45 PDEU so določene materialne pravice delavcev Unije in njihovih družinskih članov, ki uveljavljajo pravico do prostega gibanja, ki so podrobneje določene v Uredbi (EU) št. 492/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4].
The effective exercise of the freedom of movement of workers is, however, still a major challenge and many Union workers are very often unaware of their rights to free movement.
Učinkovito uveljavljanje svobode prostega gibanja delavcev pa je še vedno velik izziv in mnogi delavci Unije se zelo pogosto ne zavedajo svojih pravic do prostega gibanja.
Because of, inter alia, their potentially more vulnerable position, Union workers may still suffer from unjustified restrictions or obstacles to the exercise of their right to free movement, such as non-recognition of qualifications, discrimination on grounds of nationality and exploitation when they move to another Member State.
Med drugim so lahko delavci Unije tudi zaradi svojega potencialno bolj občutljivega položaja pri selitvi v drugo državo članico še vedno žrtve neupravičenega omejevanja ali oviranja pri uveljavljanju pravice do prostega gibanja, denimo zaradi nepriznavanja kvalifikacij, diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva in izkoriščanja.
There is, therefore, a gap between the law and its application in practice that needs to be addressed.
Med pravom in njegovo uporabo v praksi je torej vrzel, ki jo je treba odpraviti.
In July 2010, in its Communication entitled ‘Reaffirming the free movement of workers: rights and major developments’ the Commission pointed out that it would explore ways of tackling the new needs and challenges, in particular in the light of new patterns of mobility, facing Union workers and members of their family.
Komisija je julija 2010 v sporočilu z naslovom „Ponovna potrditev prostega gibanja delavcev: pravice in pomembne spremembe“ poudarila, da bo preučila načine za reševanje novih potreb in izzivov, zlasti ob upoštevanju novih vzorcev mobilnosti, s katerimi se soočajo delavci Unije in njihovi družinski člani.
It also stated that, in the context of the new strategy for the internal market, it would consider how to promote and enhance mechanisms for the effective implementation of the principle of equal treatment for Union workers and members of their family exercising their right to free movement.
Poleg tega je navedla, da bo v okviru nove strategije za notranji trg pretehtala, kako spodbuditi in okrepiti mehanizme za učinkovito izvajanje načela enakega obravnavanja delavcev Unije in njihovih družinskih članov, ki uveljavljajo pravico do prostega gibanja.
The Commission also summarised developments in legislation and case-law, in particular with regard to the personal scope of the Union law on free movement of workers and the substance of the rights enjoyed by Union workers and members of their family.
Komisija je tudi povzela razvoj zakonodaje in sodne prakse, zlasti glede osebnega področja uporabe prava Unije o prostem gibanju delavcev in glede vsebine pravic, ki jih imajo delavci Unije in njihovi družinski člani.
In the 2010 EU Citizenship Report entitled ‘Dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens' rights’ of 27 October 2010, the Commission identified the divergent and incorrect application of Union law on the right to free movement as one of the main obstacles that Union citizens are confronted with in the effective exercise of their rights under Union law.
Komisija je v poročilu o državljanstvu EU iz leta 2010 z naslovom „Odpravljanje ovir za pravice državljanov EU“ z dne 27. oktobra 2010 opredelila različno in nepravilno uporabo prava Unije o pravici do prostega gibanja kot eno glavnih ovir za državljane Unije pri učinkovitem uveljavljanju pravic na podlagi prava Unije.
Accordingly, the Commission announced its intention to take action to facilitate free movement of EU citizens and their third-country national family members by enforcing EU rules strictly, including on non-discrimination, by promoting good practices and increased knowledge or EU rules on the ground and by stepping up the dissemination of information to EU citizens about their free movement rights (action 15 of the 2010 EU Citizenship Report).
Komisija je v skladu s tem napovedala, da namerava sprejeti ukrepe, s katerimi „bo olajšala prosto gibanje državljanov EU in njihovih družinskih članov iz tretjih držav s strogim izvajanjem pravil EU, vključno s pravili o nediskriminaciji, spodbujala dobre prakse in boljše poznavanje pravil EU na terenu ter povečala razširjanje informacij državljanom EU o njihovih pravicah do prostega gibanja“ (ukrep 15 iz poročila o državljanstvu EU iz leta 2010).
In addition in the 2013 EU Citizenship Report entitled ‘EU citizens: your rights, your future’, the Commission addressed the need to remove administrative hurdles and to simplify procedures for Union citizens living, working and travelling in other Member States.
Poleg tega je v poročilu o državljanstvu EU iz leta 2013 z naslovom „Državljani EU: vaše pravice, vaša prihodnost“ Komisija obravnavala potrebo po odpravi upravnih ovir in poenostavitvi postopkov za državljane Unije, ki prebivajo, delajo in potujejo v drugih državah članicah.
In the Commission Communication entitled ‘Towards a job-rich recovery’ of 18 April 2012 (the Employment Package), the Commission announced its intention to: present a legislative proposal (information and advice) in order to support mobile workers in the exercise of rights derived from the TFEU and Regulation (EU) No 492/2011, and urged Member States to: raise awareness of and access to rights conferred by Union law in relation to anti-discrimination, gender equality and free movement of workers and to open and facilitate access by Union citizens to public sector posts, in accordance with Union law, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Komisija je v sporočilu z dne 18. aprila 2012 z naslovom „K okrevanju s številnimi novimi delovnimi mesti“ napovedala, da bo: predložila zakonodajni predlog za podporo mobilnim delavcem (obveščanje in svetovanje) pri uveljavljanju pravic, ki izhajajo iz PDEU in Uredbe (EU) št. 492/2011, in pozvala države članice, naj: povečajo ozaveščenost o pravicah, ki jih pravo Unije zagotavlja glede nediskriminacije, enakosti spolov in prostega gibanja delavcev, in dostop do teh pravic ter delovna mesta v javnem sektorju odprejo za državljane Unije in jim olajšajo dostop do njih v skladu s pravom Unije, kot ga razlaga Sodišče Evropske unije.
In this context, the Court has consistently held that the restriction of access to certain posts in the public service to a Member State's own nationals is to be interpreted restrictively and that it covers only posts involving direct or indirect participation in the exercise of powers conferred by public law and duties designed to safeguard the general interests of the State or of other public authorities.
Sodišče se v zvezi s tem dosledno drži stališča, da je treba omejitev dostopa do nekaterih delovnih mest v javnih službah, tako da so na voljo samo državljanom posamezne države članice, razlagati restriktivno, saj velja samo za delovna mesta, ki zajemajo neposredno ali posredno udeležbo pri izvajanju javnopravnih pooblastil in dolžnosti, namenjenih varovanju splošnih interesov države ali drugih javnih organov.
Adequate and effective application and enforcement of Article 45 TFEU and Regulation (EU) No 492/2011, as well as awareness of rights, are key elements in protecting the rights and equal treatment of Union workers and members of their family, whereas poor enforcement undermines the effectiveness of Union rules applicable in this area and endangers the rights and protection of Union workers and members of their family.
Ustrezna in učinkovita uporaba in izvrševanje člena 45 PDEU in Uredbe (EU) št. 492/2011 ter poznavanje pravic so ključni elementi za varstvo pravic in enako obravnavanje delavcev Unije in njihovih družinskih članov, medtem ko slabo izvrševanje zmanjšuje učinkovitost veljavnih predpisov Unije na tem področju ter ogroža pravice in varstvo delavcev Unije in njihovih družinskih članov.
A more effective and uniform application of rights conferred by Union rules on the free movement of workers is also necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
Bolj učinkovita in enotna uporaba pravic, ki jih pravila Unije zagotavljajo v zvezi s prostim gibanjem delavcev, je nujna tudi za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
The application and monitoring of the Union rules on the free movement of workers should be improved to ensure that Union workers and members of their family as well as employers, public authorities, and other persons concerned are better informed about free movement rights and responsibilities, to assist and to protect Union workers and members of their family in the exercise of those rights, and to combat circumvention of those rules by public authorities and public or private employers.
Uporabo in spremljanje pravil Unije o prostem gibanju delavcev bi bilo treba izboljšati, da bi zagotovili boljšo obveščenost delavcev Unije in njihovih družinskih članov, pa tudi delodajalcev, javnih organov in drugih oseb, ki jih to zadeva, o pravicah do prostega gibanja in odgovornostih ter tako pomagali delavcem Unije in njihovim družinskim članom in jih zaščitili pri uveljavljanju navedenih pravic ter odpravili izogibanje tem pravilom s strani javnih organov in javnih ali zasebnih delodajalcev.
In that context Member States may also take into consideration the effects of increased mobility, such as ‘brain drain’ or ‘youth drain’.
V zvezi s tem lahko države članice upoštevajo tudi učinke povečane mobilnosti, kot je „beg možganov“ in „beg mladih“.
In order to ensure the correct application of, and to monitor compliance with, the substantive Union rules on free movement of workers, Member States should take the appropriate measures to protect Union workers and members of their family exercising their right to free movement against both discrimination on grounds of nationality and any unjustified restriction or obstacle to the exercise of that right.
Da bi države članice zagotovile pravilno uporabo materialnih pravil Unije o prostem gibanju delavcev in za spremljanje skladnosti z njimi, bi morale sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za zaščito delavcev Unije in njihovih družinskih članov, ki uveljavljajo pravico do prostega gibanja, pred diskriminacijo na podlagi državljanstva ter kakršnim koli neutemeljenim omejevanjem ali oviranjem pri uveljavljanju te pravice.
To that end, it is appropriate to provide specific rules for effective enforcement and to facilitate a better and more uniform application of the substantive rules governing the freedom of movement of workers under Article 45 TFEU and under Regulation (EU) No 492/2011.
Zato je primerno določiti posebna pravila za učinkovito izvrševanje ter omogočiti boljšo in enotnejšo uporabo materialnih pravil, ki urejajo prosto gibanje delavcev na podlagi člena 45 PDEU in Uredbe (EU) št. 492/2011.
Enforcement of that fundamental freedom should take into consideration the principle of equality between women and men and the prohibition of discrimination of Union workers and members of their family on any ground set out in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’).
Pri zagotavljanju spoštovanja te temeljne svoboščine bi bilo treba upoštevati načelo enakosti moških in žensk in prepoved diskriminacije delavcev Unije in njihovih družinskih članov na kakršni koli podlagi, kot je določeno v členu 21 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina).
In that context, Union workers and members of their family who have been subject to discrimination on the grounds of nationality, or to any unjustified restriction or obstacles to exercising their right to free movement, should be guaranteed real and effective judicial protection.
V tem smislu bi morali imeti delavci Unije in njihovi družinski člani, ki so bili izpostavljeni diskriminaciji na podlagi državljanstva ali kakršnemu koli neupravičenemu omejevanju ali oviranju pri uveljavljanju pravice do prostega gibanja, zagotovljeno dejansko in učinkovito sodno varstvo.
Where Member States provide for administrative procedures as a means of legal redress, they should ensure that any administrative decision may be challenged before a tribunal within the meaning of Article 47 of the Charter.
Kadar države članice določijo upravne postopke kot pravno sredstvo, bi morale zagotoviti, da je vsako upravno odločitev mogoče izpodbijati pred sodiščem v smislu člena 47 Listine.
Taking into account the right to effective legal protection, Union workers should be protected from any adverse treatment or consequence resulting from a complaint or proceedings which aim to enforce the rights safeguarded under this Directive.
Ob upoštevanju pravice do učinkovitega pravnega varstva bi morali biti delavci Unije zaščiteni pred neugodnim obravnavanjem ali posledicami, ki nastanejo zaradi pritožbe ali postopka, katerega cilj je zagotovitev spoštovanja pravic, zaščitenih s to direktivo.
In order to provide more effective levels of protection, associations and legal entities, including the social partners, should also be empowered to engage, as the Member States determine, either on behalf of or in support of any alleged victim, with his or her approval, in proceedings.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovitejše ravni varstva, bi bilo treba tudi združenja in druge pravne osebe, vključno s socialnimi partnerji, pooblastiti za sodelovanje v postopkih, ki jih določijo države članice, v imenu vseh domnevnih žrtev ali v njihovo podporo, če te s tem soglašajo.
This should be without prejudice to national rules of procedure concerning representation and defence before the courts and to other competences and collective rights of social partners, employees' and employers' representatives, such as those relating to the enforcement of collective agreements, where applicable, including actions on behalf of a collective interest, under national law or practice.
To ne bi smelo posegati v nacionalna postopkovna pravila v zvezi z zastopanjem in obrambo pred sodišči ter druga pooblastila in kolektivne pravice socialnih partnerjev, predstavnikov delojemalcev in delodajalcev, na primer tista v zvezi z izvrševanjem kolektivnih pogodb, kadar je to ustrezno, vključno s tožbami v kolektivnem interesu, v skladu z nacionalnim pravom ali prakso.
With a view to ensuring effective legal protection, and without prejudice to the existing collective defence mechanisms available to the social partners and national law or practice, Member States are invited to examine the implementation of common principles for injunctive and compensatory collective redress mechanisms.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega pravnega varstva in brez poseganja v obstoječe mehanizme kolektivne obrambe, ki so na voljo socialnim partnerjem, ter nacionalno pravo ali prakso, naj države članice preučijo izvajanje skupnih načel za mehanizme kolektivnih opustitvenih in odškodninskih tožb.
In accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice, national rules on time limits for the enforcement of rights under this Directive should be such that they cannot be regarded as capable of rendering virtually impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of those rights.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča bi morala biti nacionalna pravila o rokih za zagotovitev spoštovanja pravic iz te direktive oblikovana tako, da uveljavljanje teh pravic zaradi njih ne bi bilo praktično nemogoče ali pretirano težavno.
Protection against discrimination based on the grounds of nationality would itself be strengthened by the existence of effective bodies with appropriate expertise in each Member State with competence to promote equal treatment, to analyse the problems faced by Union workers and members of their family, to study possible solutions and to provide specific assistance to them.
Boljša zaščita pred diskriminacijo na podlagi državljanstva bi bila zagotovljena že s tem, da bi v vsaki državi članici obstajali učinkoviti organi z ustreznim strokovnim znanjem, ki bi bili pristojni za spodbujanje enakega obravnavanja, analizo težav, s katerimi se srečujejo delavci Unije in njihovi družinski člani, preučitev možnih rešitev in zagotavljanje posebne podpore le-tem.
The competence of those bodies should include, inter alia, the provision to Union workers and members of their family of independent legal and/or other assistance, such as the provision of legal advice on the application to them of the relevant Union and national rules on free movement of workers, of information about complaint procedures, and of help to protect the rights of workers and members of their family.
Pristojnosti teh organov bi morale med drugim vključevati zagotavljanje neodvisne pravne in/ali druge pomoči delavcem Unije in njihovim družinskim članom, kot je zagotavljanje pravnih nasvetov o uporabi ustreznih pravil Unije in nacionalnih pravil o prostem gibanju delavcev, informacij o pritožbenih postopkih ter pomoč pri varstvu pravic delavcev in njihovih družinskih članov.
It may also include assistance in legal proceedings.
Vključuje lahko tudi pomoč v pravnih postopkih.
It should be up to each Member State to decide whether to attribute the tasks to be carried out under this Directive to the bodies referred to above or whether to attribute those tasks to existing bodies with similar objectives at national level, for example, the promotion of free movement of persons, the implementation of the principle of equal treatment or the safeguarding of individual rights.
Vsaka država članica bi morala sama odločiti, ali dodeliti naloge, ki se izvedejo v skladu s to direktivo, zgoraj navedenim organom, ali pa te naloge dodeliti obstoječim organom s podobnimi cilji na nacionalni ravni, kot je na primer spodbujanje prostega gibanja oseb, izvajanje načela enakega obravnavanja ali zaščita pravic posameznika.
Should a Member State decide to expand the mandate of an existing body, it should ensure allocation of sufficient resources to the existing body for the effective and adequate performance of its existing and additional tasks.
Če se država članica odloči razširiti pristojnosti obstoječega organa, bi morala temu organu zagotoviti zadostna sredstva za učinkovito in ustrezno izvajanje že dodeljenih in dodatnih nalog.
Where the tasks are allocated to more than one body, Member States should ensure that they are adequately coordinated.
Kadar se naloge dodelijo več kot enemu organu, bi morale države članice zagotoviti njihovo ustrezno usklajenost.
Member States should ensure that one or more of those bodies act as a contact point and that they cooperate and share information, such as the contact details of all the bodies, the means of redress and the contact details of the associations, organisations or other legal entities which provide information and services to Union workers and members of their family, with equivalent contact points in other Member States.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da eden ali več navedenih organov deluje kot kontaktna točka in da sodeluje z ustreznimi kontaktnimi točkami v drugih državah članicah in z njimi izmenjuje informacije, kot so kontaktni podatki vseh organov, pravna sredstva in kontaktni podatki združenj, organizacij ali drugih pravnih subjektov, ki zagotavljajo informacije in storitve delavcem Unije in njihovim družinskim članom.
The list of contact points should be made publicly available.
Na voljo javnosti bi moral biti seznam kontaktnih točk.
Member States should promote cooperation between the bodies designated by them under this Directive and existing information and assistance services provided by the social partners, associations, organisations or other relevant legal entities, such as organisations with responsibility for coordination arrangements under Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] and, where relevant, labour inspectorates.
Države članice bi morale spodbujati sodelovanje med organi, ki so jih imenovale na podlagi te direktive, ter obstoječimi informacijskimi in podpornimi storitvami, ki jih zagotavljajo socialni partnerji, združenja, organizacije ali drugi ustrezni pravni subjekti, kot so organizacije, pristojne za urejanje koordinacije v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 883/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5], po potrebi pa tudi inšpektorati za delo.
Member States should ensure the promotion of synergies with existing information and support tools at Union level and, to that end, should ensure that existing or newly created bodies work closely with the existing information and assistance services, such as Your Europe, SOLVIT, Enterprise Europe Network, the Points of Single Contact and EURES, including, where relevant, EURES cross-border partnerships.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti spodbujanje sinergij z že vzpostavljenimi informacijskimi in podpornimi orodji na ravni Unije, v ta namen pa bi morale zagotoviti tudi tesno sodelovanje obstoječih ali novoustanovljenih organov z uveljavljenimi informacijskimi in podpornimi storitvami, kot so Tvoja Evropa, SOLVIT, Evropska podjetniška mreža, enotne kontaktne točke in EURES, po potrebi pa tudi čezmejna partnerstva EURES.
Member States should promote dialogue with the social partners and with appropriate non-governmental organisations to address and combat unjustified restrictions and obstacles to the right to free movement or different forms of discrimination on the grounds of nationality.
Države članice bi morale spodbujati dialog s socialnimi partnerji in z ustreznimi nevladnimi organizacijami za odpravo in preprečevanje neupravičenega omejevanja in oviranja pravice do prostega gibanja ali različnih oblik diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva.
Member States should establish how Union citizens, such as workers, students and recent graduates, as well as employers, the social partners and other interested parties can be provided with easily accessible, relevant information on the provisions of this Directive and of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011, including information about the bodies designated under this Directive and available means of redress and protection.
Države članice bi morale ugotoviti, kako bi državljane Unije, kot so delavci, študenti in novi diplomanti, pa tudi delodajalci, socialni partnerji in druge zainteresirane strani, lahko oskrbele z zlahka dostopnimi ustreznimi informacijami o določbah te direktive in Uredbe (EU) št. 492/2011, vključno z informacijami o organih, imenovanih na podlagi te direktive, ter o razpoložljivih pravnih sredstvih in varstvu.
Member States should take measures to make this information available in more than one official Union language taking into account demands in the labour market.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti ukrepe za zagotovitev teh informacij v več kot enem uradnem jeziku Unije, upoštevajoč zahteve na trgu dela.
This should not interfere with Member States' legislation on the use of languages.
To ne bi smelo posegati v zakonodajo držav članic o rabi jezikov.
That information could be provided by individual counselling and should also be easily accessible through Your Europe and EURES.
Te informacije bi lahko zagotovili z individualnim svetovanjem in bi morale biti zlahka dostopne prek storitev Tvoja Evropa in EURES.