natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The State aid which the Czech Republic implemented in favour of ČSAD Semily a.s., Dopravní podnik města Děčín, a.s., ČSAD Střední Čechy, spol. s r.o., Dopravní podnik Teplice, s.r.o., Dopravní podnik města Ústí nad Labem a.s., Dopravní podnik měst Chomutova a Jirkova a.s. and Dopravní podnik Mladá Boleslav, s.r.o. in the form of public transport service compensations in the period from 9 September 2006 to 31 December 2006 is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 and therefore Article 93 of the Treaty.
Naknadne pogodbe za te linije, ki niso obravnavane v tem sklepu, so bile sklenjene z odprtim in preglednim postopkom oddaje javnega naročila brez pogojev, edino merilo pa je bila cena ponujene storitve.
The measure which the Czech Republic implemented for Autobusy Karlovy Vary, a.s., Autobusy Kavka, a.s., ČSAD Slaný a.s., Dopravní podnik měst Mostu a Litvínova, a.s. and ZDAR, a.s. in the form of public transport service compensations in the period from 9 September 2006 to 2 June 2007 and for Dopravní podnik města Ústí nad Labem a.s. in the form of guarantees amounting to CZK 35 million and CZK 5 million do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Razlike so le zanemarljive in v vseh primerih so zneski iz preglednice 9 (dejansko nadomestilo) nižji od rezultatov matematičnih formul.
This Decision is addressed to the Czech Republic.
Banka iz skupine Société Générale.
Done at Brussels, 25 June 2014.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 69/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri pomoči de minimis (UL L 10, 13.1.2001, str. 30).
For the Commission
Zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, Recueil 2003, str.
Vice-President
I-7747.
Commission Decision of 16 April 2008 (OJ C 187, 24.7.2008, p.
Za štiri pogoje iz sodbe v zadevi Altmark glej uvodno izjavo 98.
14).
Češki organi so nadalje opozorili, da dejstvo, da je regija Ústí objavila drugi krog za podelitev koncesij, dokazuje njen odprt in pregleden pristop, saj bi bili v zadevnem primeru izpolnjeni pogoji za javni razpis brez javne objave (v skladu s členom 31(1)(c) Direktive 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str.
See footnote 1.
114))).
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p.
V enem območju regije Ústí je osnovno prevozno storitev zagotovilo podjetje Zdar, a.s.
1).
Uredba (EGS) št. 1107/70 Sveta z dne 4. junija 1970 o dodeljevanju pomoči v železniškem in cestnem prevozu ter prevozu po celinskih plovnih poteh (UL L 130, 15.6.1970, str. 1).
According to the Czech authorities the majority of the public passenger bus transport market is served on the basis of contracts for public service obligations.
Čeprav je bila uredba s 3. decembrom 2009 razveljavljena, se je uporabljala v času povečanja kapitala leta 2006.
Some provisions of the Road Transport Act, in particular with respect to the public service obligation, were repealed as of July 2010 by Act No 194/2010, on public services in passenger transport, and replaced by specific provisions of the latter act.
Navedeni pristop je skladen s splošnim pristopom Komisije k storitvam splošnega gospodarskega pomena v drugih sektorjih.
However, the legal framework described in this section reflects the situation in the period relevant for the assessment of the alleged State aid measures, i.e. years 2004-2007.
Glej zlasti točko 48 Sporočila Komisije o uporabi pravil Evropske unije o državni pomoči za nadomestilo, dodeljeno za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena (UL L 8, 11.1.2012, str. 4).
Before the accession of the Czech Republic to the Union, the compensation for losses from public transport obligations was ensured through contracts between the municipality and the main provider of public transport.
Glej uvodno izjavo 17.
Those contracts, though not formally contracts of public service obligations as regards their form, fulfilled the substantial character of such contracts.
Ta sklep ne posega v oceno Komisije v zvezi z uporabo prava Unije na področju javnega naročanja.
The basis for the calculation of compensation was an expert opinion of forecasted losses from the operation of the public transport line as determined by the public service obligation.
V zvezi s tem glej Sporočilo Komisije o uporabi pravil Evropske unije o državni pomoči za nadomestilo, dodeljeno za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, navedeno v uvodni izjavi 32, oddelek 3.6.2.
If the actual loss was significantly different from the loss forecasted by the expert opinion, the final settlement was carried out at the end of the calendar year.
Zadeva 730/79, Philip Morris, Recueil 1980, str. 2671, točka 11;
The same principle applied to possible overcompensations.
združene zadeve T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97 do 607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98 do T-6/98 in T-23/98, Alzetta, Recueil 2000, str.
Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 of the Council of 26 June 1969 on action by Member States concerning the obligations inherent in the concept of a public service in transport by rail, road and inland waterway (OJ L 156, 28.6.1969, p. 1).
II-2319, točka 80.
Under Czech law, the compensation for public service contracts is equivalent to the notion of provable loss.
Alzetta, točke 141–147;
For a similar case, see also Commission Decision C 3/08 (ex NN 102/05) of 26 November 2008 — Czech Republic — Public service compensations for Southern Moravia Bus Companies (OJ L 97, 16.4.2009, p.
Zadeva T-288/97, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Recueil 2001, str.
14), or Commission Decision C(2008) 1627 final N 495/07 of 30 April 2008 — Czech Republic — Program pořízení a obnovy železničních kolejových vozidel (OJ C 152, 18.6.2008, p.
II-1619, točka 41.
21).
UL C 71, 11.3.2000, str. 14.
The reasonable profit is to be understood as meaning “the sum which — after taxation […] — does not exceed 1/8th of the price of the buses normally used for the public line passenger transport providing the traffic services in the framework of the fulfilment of the public service obligation, reduced by the sum of the total real depreciation of those buses, and the sum spent for investments related to the operation of the public line passenger transport, provided that the relevant authority expressed its approval for the investment for the purpose of its incorporation into the calculation of the provable loss”.
Altmark Trans, točki 77 in 78.
Decree of the Ministry of Transport and Communications No 50/1998, on provable loss in the public line passenger transport, was replaced by Regulation No 493/2004 as of 21 September 2004.
Zadeva 156/77, Komisija proti Belgiji, Recueil 1978, str.
Regulation No 493/2004 remained in force until 1 July 2010, that is during the period when the compensations under investigation were granted.
I-1881, točka 10.
The incumbent and formerly State-owned regional bus transport provider for the Ústí Region and the Liberec Region in 2004.
Zadeva T-157/01, Danske Busvognmænd, Recueil 2004, str.
DPÚK is one of the legal successors to ČSAD following its dissolution into two regional bus companies:
II-917, točke 77–79.
one for the Ústí Region (DPÚK) and one for the Liberec Region.
Zadeva C-504/07, Antrop in drugi, ZOdl.
Even with the figures as corrected by the Czech authorities, the amounts indicated in the table do not entirely correspond to the given formula in some cases (provable loss in CZK/km multiplied by the number of kilometres does not entirely match the overall provable loss in CZK).
2009, str.
However, the differences are only marginal and in all cases the amounts presented in Table 2 (compensation actually given) are lower than the results of the logical formulas.
I-3867.
Expected price of transport services is the sum of the economically admissible costs which should be incurred by an operator in performing transport public service obligations and a reasonable profit relating to such expenditure.
Zadeva C-334/07 Ρ, Komisija proti Freistaat Sachsen, ZOdl.
Foreseen revenue is receipts and revenues which should be achieved by the operator in performing the transport public service obligation including ticketing revenue.
2008, str. 1-9465, točka 51.
In some cases, the amounts indicated in the table do not entirely correspond to the mathematical formulas (expected overall price of transport services being calculated as number of km multiplied by expected overall price of transport services; foreseen overall revenue being calculated as number of km multiplied by foreseen revenue in CZK/km; provable loss CZK/km being calculated as expected price of transport services in CZK/km minus foreseen revenue in CZK/km, etc.)
Združene zadeve C-465/09 Ρ do C-470/09 Ρ, Diputación Foral de Vizcaya in drugi proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
According to the Czech authorities, the provable loss was negotiated with certain transport providers to be lower than the difference between the expected price of transport services and foreseen revenue.
2011, str.
The reason why certain names appear more than once is that there are multiple contracts involving the same service provider.
I-83, točki 125 in 128.
In some cases, the amounts indicated in the table do not entirely correspond to the given formula (provable loss in CZK/km multiplied by the number of kilometres does not entirely match the overall provable loss in CZK).
Najnovejša je zadeva T-570/08 RENV, Deutsche Post proti Komisiji, ZOdl.
Following the termination of service by DPÚK on 8 September 2006 and as a result of the fact that the operator chosen as a replacement in the tender failed to ensure the service.
II-0000, točka 167.
Subsequent contracts for these lines, which do not form the subject matter of this Decision, were concluded following an open, transparent and unconditional awarding procedure with the sole criterion being the price of the offered service.
Člen 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007 določa pravila o sklepanju pogodb o izvajanju storitev javnega prevoza.
Those contracts were concluded for a period of eight years.
Češki organi so glede pogodb, sklenjenih po 31. decembru 2006, pojasnili, da so bili prevozniki izbrani v skladu z odprtim in preglednim postopkom oddaje javnega naročila brez pogojev, edino merilo pa je bila cena ponujene storitve.
However, the differences are only marginal and in all cases the amounts presented in the Table 9 below (compensation actually given) are lower than the results of the mathematical formulas.
Navedene pogodbe so bile sklenjene za obdobje osmih let, tako da je regija Ústí že sprejela ukrepe za postopno uskladitev s členom 5 Uredbe.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid (OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p.
Glej npr. Odločbo Komisije C 3/08 (ex NN 102/05) z dne 26. novembra 2008 – Češka republika – Nadomestila za izvajanje javne službe za avtobusna podjetja Južne Moravske (UL L 97, 16.4.2009, str. 14), uvodna izjava 71.
30).
Izjema na podlagi člena 3(1)(b) je bila v preteklosti uporabljena v številnih sklepih Komisije v zvezi s shemami državne pomoči.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [2003] ECR I-7747.
Glej na primer Sklep Komisije C(2007) 3394 final z dne 18. julija 2007 v zadevi N 720/06 – Port of Brussels (Bruseljsko pristanišče) (UL C 307, 18.12.2007, str. 10) in Sklep Komisije C(2002) 3248 final z dne 18. septembra 2002 v zadevi N 308/02 – Scheme for granting investment aid for railway infrastructure in Saxony-Anhalt (Shema za dodelitev pomoči za naložbo v železniško infrastrukturo v deželi Sachsen-Anhalt) (UL C 277, 14.11.2002, str. 2).
For the four Altmark conditions, see recital 98.
Glede začasnih ukrepov je bila izjema uporabljena v primeru pomoči za naložbe za podjetje Stora Enso Langerbrugge;
The Czech authorities further noted that the fact that the Ústí Region published the second concession round demonstrated its open and transparent approach because in the case at hand the conditions for public procurement under a non-public procedure would be fulfilled (in line with Article 31(1)(c) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p.
glej Odločbo Komisije C(2004) 3351 z dne 8. septembra 2004 v zadevi C 73/03 – Državna pomoč za Stora Enso Langerbrugge (UL L 53, 26.2.2005, str. 66).
114)).
Pogoji, ki so bili v zadevni odločbi uporabljeni za ocenjevanje združljivosti, vključujejo:
Zdar, a.s. ensured basic public transport service in one area of the Ústí Region.
ukrep se izvaja za usklajevanje prevoza, stroški infrastrukture v primerjavi z drugimi načini prevoza so višji, najvišja intenzivnost pomoči je 50 % in prisoten je spodbujevalni učinek.
Regulation (EEC) No 1107/70 of the Council of 4 June 1970 on the granting of aids for transport by rail, road and inland waterway (OJ L 130, 15.6.1970, p. 1).
Glej točko 52, Sklep Komisije z dne 9. novembra 2011, SA.32632 (2011/N), Belgija, Intermodal Container Terminal Genk (Intermodalni kontejnerski terminal Genk) (UL C 82, 21.3.2012, str. 2);
Even though the Regulation was repealed as of 3 December 2009, it was applicable at the time of the capital increase of 2006.
Sklep Komisije z dne 15. junija 2011, SA.32224, Nizozemska, Development of the Alblasserdam Container Transferium (Razvoj območja Alblasserdam za pretovor zabojnikov) (UL C 215, 21.7.2011, str. 22);
That approach is consistent with the Commission's general approach to Services of General Economic Interest in other sectors.
Sklep Komisije z dne 20. julija 2010, C 17/2010, Italija, Firmin srl (UL C 278, 15.10.2010, str. 28);
See, in particular, point 48 of the Communication from the Commission on the application of the European Union State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest (OJ C 8, 11.1.2012, p.
Sklep Komisije z dne 27. junija 2012, SA.34056 (12/N), Združeno kraljestvo, Cable Car for London (Nihalka za London) (UL C 220, 25.7.2012, str. 6);
4).
Sklep Komisije z dne 17. oktobra 2012, SA.34501, Nemčija, Extension of the inland port of Königs Wusterhausen/Wildau (Razširitev pristanišča na celinskih vodah Königs Wusterhausen/Wildau) (UL C 176, 21.6.2013, str. 1);
See recital 17.
Sklep Komisije z dne 18. marca 2013, SA.37402 (2013/N), Madžarska, The intermodal development of the Freeport of Budapest (Intermodalni razvoj prostega pristanišča v Budimpešti) (UL C 141, 9.5.2014, str. 5).
This conclusion is without prejudice to the Commission's assessment concerning the application of Union law with regard to public procurement.
European transport policy for 2010 (Bela knjiga: Evropska prometna politika za leto 2010) (http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/environment/tackling_climate_change/l24007_en.htm).
In this respect, see also the Communication from the Commission on the application of the European Union State aid rules to compensations granted for the provision of services of general economic interest, cited in footnote 32, section 3.6.2.
Glej Sklep Komisije z dne 31. januarja 2001 v zadevi N 597/2000, Nizozemska – Subsidieregeling voor bijzondere bedrijfsaansluitingen op vaarwegen, (UL C 102, 31.3.2001, str. 8), Sklep Komisije z dne 14. septembra 2001 v zadevi N 208/2000, Nizozemska – SOIT (UL C 315, 4.11.2000, str. 22), Sklep Komisije z dne 15. novembra 2000 v zadevi N 755/1999, Italija – Bolzano (UL C 71, 3.3.2001, str. 19) in Sklep Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2010 v zadevi N 490/10, Belgija – Verlenging van steunregeling N 550/2001 inzake publiek-private samenwerking voor de bouw van laad- en losinstallaties langs de waterwegen in het Vlaams Gewest (UL C 122, 20.4.2011, str. 2).
Case 730/79 Philip Morris [1980] ECR 2671, paragraph 11;
Sklep Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2011 v zadevi SA.33434, Francija – Aide au financement d'un chantier multimodal sur le Grand port maritime du Havre (UL C 53, 23.2.2012, str. 2);
Alzetta, paragraphs 141 to 147;
Sklep Komisije z dne 19. junija 2013 v zadevi SA.35738, Grčija – Aid for the upgrading of the Katakolo port (UL C 204, 18.7.2013, str. 3);
Case T-288/97 Friuli-Venezia Giulia [2001] ECR II-1619, paragraph 41.
Sklep Komisije z dne 2. julija 2013 v zadevi SA.35418, Grčija – Extension of the Piraeus port ((UL C 256, 5.9.2013, str. 2).
OJ C 71, 11.3.2000, p.
Po navedbah podjetja DPÚK so organi regije Ústí nekaterim regionalnim avtobusnim prevoznikom dodelili nadomestilo za izpolnjevanje obveznosti javnih služb v obdobju 2004–2007.
14.
Poleg tega je bilo navedenim prevoznikom odobrenih več domnevnih ukrepov pomoči v različnih oblikah, tj. z ugodnimi posojili, nepovratnimi sredstvi, poroštvi, povečanjem lastniškega kapitala, najemom vozil, najemom avtobusne postaje in upravljanjem parkirnih ur.
Altmark Trans, paragraphs 77 and 78.
podjetjem ČSAD BUS Ústí nad Labem a.s.
Case 156/77 Commission v Belgium [1978] ECR I-1881, paragraph 10.
Spomladi 2005 so bili sklenjeni nadaljnji dodatki, s katerimi se je veljavnost pogodb podaljšala do 31. decembra 2005.
Case T-157/01 Danske Busvognmænd [2004] ECR II-917, paragraphs 77 to 79.
Navedeni dodatki so bili sklenjeni z istimi prevozniki, kot so navedeni v prejšnji uvodni izjavi, razen podjetja Petr Frommel, ki ni bilo več zainteresirano za opravljanje prevoznih storitev v regiji.
Case C-504/07 Antrop and Others [2009] ECR I-3867.
Trimesečni odpovedni rok, določen v navedeni pogodbi, se je iztekel 1. maja 2006.
The Commission also refers in this respect to the reasoning developed in recitals 307 to 313 of its Decision C(2010) 975 final of 24 February 2010 in Case C 41/08 (ex NN 35/08) concerning public transport service contracts between the Danish Ministry of Transport and Danske Statsbaner (OJ L 7, 11.1.2011, p. 1).
V navedenem obdobju je podjetje DPÚK opravljalo prevozne storitve, za kar je prejelo nadomestilo.
The judgment is currently under appeal before the Court of Justice in Case C-303/13 P.
Po navedbah čeških organov je navedeno nadomestilo znašalo 92172509,24 CZK.
Case C-334/07 Ρ Commission v Freistaat Sachsen [2008] ECR 1-9465, paragraph 51.
Komisija je glede ukrepa točke (h) uvodne izjave 42 ugotovila, da ni pristojna za ocenjevanje najema trolejbusov, ki ga je občina Teplice podjetju DP Teplice zagotovila na podlagi prvotne pogodbe z dne 10. decembra 2003.
Joined Cases C-465/09 Ρ to C-470/09 Ρ Diputación Foral de Vizcaya and Others v Commission [2011] ECR I-83, paragraphs 125 and 128.
Ker je bila najemna pogodba zaradi najema dodatnih trolejbusov od takrat dvakrat spremenjena, tj. 5. maja 2006 in 18. oktobra 2006, bi Komisija lahko ocenila najem na podlagi navedenih sprememb.
Most recently, Case T-570/08 RENV Deutsche Post v Commission [2013] ECR II-0000, paragraph 167.
Komisija je izrazila pomisleke zlasti glede pojma nepredvidenih stroškov in metodologije izračunavanja teh stroškov, saj so plačila podjetjem DP Teplice in DP Ústí, izračunana na tej podlagi, v letih 2005 in 2006 presegla pričakovano omejitev prejemkov.
Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 lays down rules on the award of public transport service contracts.
Komisija je izrazila pomisleke tudi glede metodologije, ki se je uporabila za preverjanje, ali višina cen, ki so jih pričakovali prevozniki, ustreza posebnostim zagotovljenih storitev.
However, according to Article 8(2), ‘without prejudice to paragraph 3, the award of public service contracts by rail and by road shall comply with Article 5 as from 3 December 2019’.
Češki organi so v zvezi s tem opozorili, da za osnovne prevozne storitve noben prevoznik ni prejel nadomestila, višjega od predhodne objektivne ocene dokazljive izgube iz pogodb o izvajanju javne službe v letih 2005 in 2006.
Article 2(e) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 defines the ‘public service obligation’ as ‘a requirement defined or determined by a competent authority in order to ensure public passenger transport services in the general interest that an operator, if it were considering its own commercial interests, would not assume or would not assume to the same extent or under the same conditions without reward’.
Češki organi trdijo, da je iz navedene primerjave razvidno, da se cene niso bistveno razlikovale in da so bile razlike v cenah med različnimi območji leta 2007 celo višje kot leta 2005.
See, e.g. Commission Decision C 3/08 (ex NN 102/05) of 26 November 2008 — Czech Republic — Public service compensations for Southern Moravia Bus Companies (OJ L 97, 16.4.2009, p.
Iz iste analize je razvidno, da med dobičkom na podlagi pogodb za leto 2005 in 2007 prav tako ni bilo večjih razlik.
14), recital 71.
Zato bi se za dobiček, ki so ga imeli prevozniki v obravnavanem obdobju, moralo šteti, da je v skladu s četrtim pogojem iz sodbe v zadevi Altmark.
The exemption under Article 3(1)(b) was used in the past in a number of Commission decisions involving State aid schemes.
Navedena linija je sestavni del osrednjega javnega mestnega prevoza v občini Ústí nad Labem, sestavljenega iz obsežnega ekološkega trolejbusnega prevoza, ki se je v občini vzpostavljal od leta 1984 in postopno začenjal z delovanjem od leta 1988.
See, e.g. Commission Decision C(2007) 3394 final of 18 July 2007 in Case N 720/06 — Port of Brussels (OJ C 307, 18.12.2007, p.
Izgradnja zadevne linije predstavlja zadnjo fazo izgradnje sistema, njeno dokončanje pa bo velik del občine na desnem bregu povezalo z osrednjim trolejbusnim prevozom.
10), and Commission Decision C(2002)3248 final of 18 September 2002 in Case N 308/02 — Scheme for granting investment aid for railway infrastructure in Saxony-Anhalt (OJ C 277, 14.11.2002, p.
Podjetje DPÚK je zahtevalo, da se take razmere odpravijo ter se mu dovoli, da prevzame avtobuse in zaposlene od trenutno nezakonito izbranih prevoznikov ter ponovno začne izvajati prvotno uvedene obveznosti javne službe, ki bi morale prenehati šele leta 2011.
2).
Poleg tega je podjetje DPÚK trdilo, da so podatki za obdobje 2006–2008 dokaz za njegovo trditev, da bi bili končni stroški zagotavljanja regionalnih avtobusnih storitev novih prevoznikov višji.
As regards ad hoc measures, the exemption was applied in the case of investment aid in favour of Stora Enso Langerbrugge;
Češki organi niso predložili podatkov o povprečnem dobičku za leto 2006.
see Commission Decision C(2004) 3351 of 8 September 2004 in Case C 73/03 — Investment aid in favour of Stora Enso Langerbrugge (OJ L 53, 26.2.2005, p. 66).
Povprečna profitna marža za leto 2006 je verjetno podobna kot v letih 2005 in 2007, saj so bili drugi zadevni podatki (povprečna cena na kilometer leta 2007 je znašala 31,72 CZK, povprečna dokazljiva izguba na kilometer pa 17,49 CZK) podobni, ista pa je bila tudi metodologija za izračun primernega dobička (glej opombo 9).
The conditions used in that Decision for assessing compatibility include:
Leta 2005 so cene različnih prevoznikov znašale med 21,50 CZK in 37,16 CZK na kilometer, leta 2007 pa so znašale med 25,48 CZK in 45,79 CZK na kilometer.
qualification of the measure as transport coordination, higher infrastructure costs compared to competing modes of transport, maximum intensity of the aid of 50 % and existence of an incentive effect.
Češki organi trdijo, da se povprečna višina cene na kilometer in razpon posameznih cen v letih 2005 in 2007 nista bistveno razlikovala, zato je treba za cene iz leta 2005 šteti, da ustrezajo stroškom povprečnega, dobro vodenega podjetja, primerno opremljenega s prevoznimi sredstvi.
See point 52, decision of the Commission Decision of 9 November 2011, SA.32632 (2011/N), Belgium, Intermodal Container Terminal Genk (OJ C 82, 21.3.2012, p.
Podjetje DP Ústí je v letih 2004 in 2005 prejelo poroštvi občine Ústí nad Labem za zavarovanje bančnih posojil v višini 35 milijonov CZK in 5 milijonov CZK.
2);
Posojili sta bili namenjeni končanju izgradnje trolejbusne linije Ústí nad Labem – Střekov.
Commission Decision of 15 June 2011, SA.32224, Netherlands, Development of the Alblasserdam Container Transferium (OJ C 215, 21.7.2011, p.
Uredba Ministrstva za promet in zveze št. 50/1998 Coll. o dokazljivi izgubi v javnem potniškem prevozu je z 21. septembrom 2004 zamenjala Uredba št. 493/2004 Coll.