natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission Communication of 19 October 2010 entitled 'The EU Budget Review' and the Commission Communication of 29 June 2011 entitled 'A budget for Europe 2020' underline the importance of focusing funding on actions with clear European added value, i.e. where Union intervention can bring additional value compared to the action of Member States alone.
V sporočilu Komisije z naslovom „Pregled proračuna EU“ in sporočilu Komisije z dne 29. junija 2011 z naslovom „Proračun za Evropo 2020“ je poudarjen pomen usmerjanja financiranja v ukrepe z očitno evropsko dodano vrednostjo, in sicer tam, kjer posredovanje Unije lahko prinese dodatno vrednost v primerjavi s samostojnim ukrepanjem držav članic.
Actions covered by this Regulation should contribute to the development of mutual trust between Member States, increasing cross-border cooperation and networking and achieving the correct, coherent and consistent application of Union law.
Ukrepi, ki jih zajema ta uredba, bi morali prispevati k razvoju vzajemnega zaupanja med državami članicami z večanjem obsega čezmejnega sodelovanja in povezovanja v mreže ter doseganjem pravilne, skladne in dosledne uporabe prava Unije.
Funding activities should also contribute to achieving effective and better knowledge of Union law and policies by all those concerned and should provide a sound analytical basis for the support and the development of Union law and policies, in so doing contributing to their enforcement and proper implementation.
Dejavnosti financiranja bi morale prispevale tudi k temu, da bi vsi, na katere se pravo in politike Unije nanašajo, te učinkovito in bolje poznali, zagotoviti pa bi morale tudi trdno analitično podlago za podporo pravu in politikam Unije ter njihovemu razvoju, s čimer bi prispevale k njihovemu uveljavljanju in ustreznemu izvajanju.
Union intervention allows for those actions to be pursued consistently across the Union and brings economies of scale.
Posredovanje Unije omogoča, da se ti ukrepi dosledno izvajajo po vsej Uniji in zagotavlja ekonomijo obsega.
Moreover, the Union is in a better position than Member States to address cross-border situations and to provide a European platform for mutual learning.
Poleg tega Unija enostavneje kot države članice rešuje čezmejne primere in zagotavlja evropsko platformo za vzajemno učenje.
The interim evaluation report shall assess the achievement of the Programme's objectives, the efficiency of the use of resources and the Programme's European added value with a view to determining whether funding in areas covered by the Programme should be renewed, modified or suspended after 2020.
V vmesnem poročilu vrednotenja se ocenijo doseganje ciljev Programa, učinkovitost uporabe sredstev in evropska dodana vrednost Programa, s čimer se ugotovi, ali bi bilo treba financiranje na področjih iz Programa po letu 2020 podaljšati, spremeniti ali prekiniti.
It shall also address the scope for any simplification of the Programme, its internal and external coherence, and the continued relevance of all objectives and actions.
Poročilo se dotakne tudi možnosti za morebitno poenostavitev Programa, njegove usklajenosti navznoter in navzven ter vprašanja nadaljnje smotrnosti vseh ciljev in ukrepov.
Regulation (EU) No 1382/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 1382/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
establishing a Justice Programme for the period 2014 to 2020
o uvedbi programa za pravosodje za obdobje 2014 do 2020
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 81(1) and (2), Article 82(1) and Article 84 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 81(1) in (2), člena 82(1) in člena 84 Pogodbe,
The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides for the creation of an area of freedom, security and justice, in which persons are free to move.
Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) določa vzpostavitev območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, v katerem se osebe prosto gibajo.
To that end, the Union may adopt measures to develop judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters and to promote and support the action of Member States in the field of crime prevention.
V ta namen lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe za razvoj pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih in kazenskih zadevah ter spodbuja in podpira ukrepe držav članic na področju preprečevanja kriminalitete.
Respect for fundamental rights as well as for common principles, such as non-discrimination, gender equality, effective access to justice for all, the rule of law and a well-functioning independent judicial system should be ensured in the further development of a European area of justice.
Pri nadaljnjem razvoju evropskega območja pravice bi bilo treba zagotoviti spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in skupnih načel, kot so boj proti diskriminaciji, enakost spolov, učinkovit dostop do sodnega varstva za vse, pravna država in dobro delujoč neodvisen sodni sistem.
In the Stockholm Programme [4] the European Council reaffirmed the priority of developing an area of freedom, security and justice and specified as a political priority the achievement of a Europe of law and justice.
Evropski svet je v stockholmskem programu [4] kot prednostno nalogo znova potrdil razvoj območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, med prednostne naloge politike pa uvrstil uresničevanje Evrope prava in pravice.
The ambitious goals set by the Treaties and by the Stockholm Programme should be attained inter alia by establishing, for the period 2014 to 2020, a flexible and effective Justice Programme (the "Programme") which should facilitate planning and implementation.
Ambiciozne cilje, določene v pogodbah in stockholmskem programu, bi bilo treba med drugim uresničiti z vzpostavitvijo prožnega in učinkovitega programa za pravosodje za obdobje 2014 do 2020 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Program), ki bi olajšal načrtovanje in izvajanje.
The general and specific objectives of the Programme should be interpreted in line with the relevant strategic guidelines defined by the European Council.
Splošne in posebne cilje Programa bi bilo treba razlagati v skladu z zadevnimi strateškimi smernicami, ki jih je določil Evropski svet.
The Commission Communication of 3 March 2010 on the Europe 2020 Strategy sets out a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
V sporočilu Komisije o strategiji Evropa 2020 z dne 3. marca 2010 je določena strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast.
A well-functioning area of justice, where obstacles in cross-border judicial proceedings and access to justice in cross-border situations are eliminated, should be developed as a key element to support the specific objectives and flagship initiatives of the Europe 2020 Strategy and to facilitate mechanisms designed to promote growth.
Kot ključni element v podporo posebnim ciljem in osrednjim pobudam strategije Evropa 2020 ter zaradi lažjega delovanja mehanizmov za spodbujanje rasti bi bilo treba vzpostaviti dobro delujoče območje pravice, v katerem ne bo več ovir v čezmejnih sodnih postopkih in pri dostopu do sodnega varstva v čezmejnih situacijah.
For the purposes of this Regulation, the term "judiciary and judicial staff" should be interpreted so as to include judges, prosecutors and court officers, as well as other legal practitioners associated with the judiciary, such as lawyers, notaries, bailiffs, probation officers, mediators and court interpreters.
Za namene te uredbe bi bilo treba pod izraz "sodniki in sodno osebje" šteti sodnike, tožilce in uradnike sodišč ter druge pravosodne delavce, kot so odvetniki, notarji, sodni izvršitelji, svetovalci za pogojno izpuščene, mediatorji in sodni tolmači.
Judicial training is central to building mutual trust and improves cooperation between judicial authorities and practitioners in the various Member States.
Izobraževanje v pravosodju je ključno za krepitev medsebojnega zaupanja ter izboljšuje sodelovanje med pravosodnimi organi in delavci v različnih državah članicah.
Judicial training should be seen as an essential element in promoting a genuine European judicial culture in the context of the Commission Communication of 13 September 2011 entitled "Building trust in EU-wide justice. A new dimension to European judicial training", the Council Resolution on the training of judges, prosecutors and judicial staff in the European Union [5], the Council conclusions of 27 and 28 October 2011 on European judicial training and the European Parliament resolution of 14 March 2012 on judicial training.
Izobraževanje v pravosodju bi bilo treba šteti za ključni element pri spodbujanju pristne evropske pravosodne kulture, in sicer v luči sporočila Komisije z dne 13. septembra 2011 z naslovom "Vzpostavljanje zaupanja v pravosodni sistem celotne EU – nova razsežnost evropskega izobraževanja v pravosodju", resolucije Sveta o usposabljanju sodnikov in tožilcev ter pravosodnega osebja v Evropski uniji [5], sklepov Sveta o evropskem izobraževanju v pravosodju z dne 27. in 28. oktobra 2011 ter resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. marca 2012 o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov.
Judicial training can involve different actors, such as Member States' legal, judicial and administrative authorities, academic institutions, national bodies responsible for judicial training, European-level training organisations or networks, or networks of court coordinators of Union law.
Izobraževanje v pravosodju lahko vključuje različne akterje, kot so pravni, pravosodni in upravni organi držav članic, akademske ustanove, nacionalni organi, odgovorni za izobraževanje v pravosodju, organizacije za usposabljanje na evropski ravni ali mreže sodnih koordinatorjev za pravo Unije.
Bodies and entities pursuing a general European interest in the field of training of the judiciary, such as the European Judicial Training Network (EJTN), the Academy of European Law (ERA), the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ), the Association of the Councils of State and Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions of the European Union (ACA-Europe), the Network of the Presidents of Supreme Judicial Courts of the European Union (RPCSJUE) and the European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA), should continue to play their role in promoting training programmes with a genuine European dimension for the judiciary and judicial staff, and could therefore be granted adequate financial support in accordance with the procedures and the criteria set out in the annual work programmes adopted by the Commission pursuant to this Regulation.
Organi in subjekti, ki se zavzemajo za splošni evropski interes na področju izobraževanja v pravosodju, kot so Evropsko omrežje za izobraževanje pravosodnih organov (EJTN), Akademija za evropsko pravo (ERA), Evropska mreža sodnih svetov (ENCJ), Združenje državnih svetov in vrhovnega upravnega sodstva Evropske unije (ACA-Europe), Mreža predsednikov vrhovnih sodišč Evropske unije (EUSJC) in Evropski inštitut za javno upravo (EIPA), bi morali še naprej dejavno spodbujati programe usposabljanja s pristno evropsko razsežnostjo za sodnike in sodno osebje, zato bi se jim lahko namenila ustrezna finančna podpora v skladu s postopki in merili iz letnih delovnih programov, ki jih Komisija sprejme v skladu s to uredbo.
The Union should facilitate training activities on the implementation of Union law by considering the salaries of participating judiciary and judicial staff incurred by the Member States' authorities as eligible costs or co-financing in kind, in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] (the "Financial Regulation").
Unija bi morala poskrbeti za lažje izvajanje dejavnosti usposabljanja glede izvajanja prava Unije s tem, da bi v skladu z Uredbo (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: finančna uredba) plače sodelujočih sodnikov in sodnega osebja, ki jih izplačajo organi držav članic, štela za upravičene stroške ali sofinanciranje v naravi.
Access to justice should include, in particular, access to courts, to alternative methods of dispute settlement and to public office-holders obliged by the law to provide parties with independent and impartial legal advice.
Dostop do sodnega varstva bi moral zlasti vključevati dostop do sodišč, alternativnih načinov reševanja sporov ter nosilcev javne funkcije, ki morajo različnim stranem v skladu s pravom zagotoviti neodvisno in nepristransko pravno svetovanje.
In December 2012 the Council endorsed the EU Drugs Strategy (2013-20) [7], which aims to take a balanced approach based on simultaneous reduction of drug demand and drug supply, acknowledging that drug demand reduction and drug supply reduction are mutually reinforcing elements in illicit drugs policy.
Svet je decembra 2012 sprejel strategijo EU na področju drog (2013–2020) [7], katere cilj je doseči uravnotežen pristop, ki bi temeljil na hkratnem zmanjševanju povpraševanja po drogah in njihove ponudbe ob upoštevanju dejstva, da sta zmanjšanje ponudbe drog in zmanjšanje povpraševanja po njih medsebojno dopolnjujoča se elementa politike na področju prepovedanih drog.
That Strategy maintains as one of its main objectives the aim of contributing to a measurable reduction of drug demand, of drug dependence and of drug-related health and social risks and harms.
Eden glavnih ciljev navedene strategije je namen prispevati k merljivemu zmanjšanju povpraševanja po drogah, odvisnosti od drog ter zdravstvenih in socialnih tveganj ter škode, ki jih droge povzročajo.
Whereas the Drug prevention and information programme established by Decision No 1150/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [8] was based on a public health legal basis and covered those aspects, the Programme is founded on a different legal basis and should aim at the further development of a European area of justice based on mutual recognition and mutual trust, in particular by promoting judicial cooperation.
Medtem ko je program za preprečevanje uporabe drog in obveščanje, vzpostavljen s Sklepom št. 1150/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8], temeljil na pravni podlagi v zvezi z javnim zdravstvom in zajemal tovrstne vidike, Program temelji na drugačni pravni podlagi in bi moral biti usmerjen k nadaljnjemu razvoju evropskega območja pravice, temelječega na medsebojnem priznavanju in zaupanju, zlasti s spodbujanjem pravosodnega sodelovanja.
Thus, in responding to the need for simplification and in line with the legal basis of each programme, the Health for Growth Programme can support measures to complement the Member's States action in attaining the objective of reducing drug-related health damage, including information and prevention.
Tako se lahko s programom "Zdravje za rast" kot odziv na potrebo po poenostavitvi in v skladu s pravno podlago posameznega programa podprejo ukrepi za dopolnitev dejavnosti držav članic za doseganje cilja zmanjšanja z drogami povezane škode za zdravje, vključno z obveščanjem in preprečevanjem.
Another important element of the EU Drugs Strategy (2013-20) is drug supply reduction.
Še en pomemben element strategije EU na področju drog za obdobje 2013–2020 je zmanjšanje ponudbe drog.
Whereas the Instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management, as part of the Internal Security Fund, should support actions aimed at preventing and combating the trafficking of drugs and other types of crime, and in particular measures targeting the production, manufacture, extraction, sale, transport, importation and exportation of illegal drugs, including possession and purchase with a view to engaging in drug trafficking activities, the Programme should cover those aspects of drugs policy that are not covered by the Instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management, as part of the Internal Security Fund, or by the Health for Growth Programme and are closely linked to its general objective.
Medtem ko bi se iz Instrumenta za finančno podporo policijskemu sodelovanju, preprečevanju kriminalitete in boju proti njej, ter krizno upravljanje, kot dela Sklada za notranjo varnost,, morali podpirati ukrepi, katerih cilj je preprečevanje trgovine z drogo in drugih vrst kriminala ter boj proti njim, in zlasti ukrepi za boj proti proizvodnji, izdelavi, pridobivanju, prodaji, prevozu, uvozu in izvozu prepovedanih drog, vključno s posedovanjem in nakupom z namenom opravljanja dejavnosti trgovine z drogo, bi moral Program vključevati tiste vidike politike na področju drog, ki jih Instrument za finančno podporo policijskemu sodelovanju, preprečevanju kriminalitete in boju proti njej, ter krizno upravljanje, kot del Sklada za notranjo varnost, ali program "Zdravje za rast" ne zajemata ter so tesno povezani s splošnim ciljem Programa.
In any case, the continued financing of the priorities under the 2007-2013 programming period that have been maintained as objectives under the new EU Drugs Strategy (2013-20) should be ensured, and funds should therefore be available from the Health for Growth Programme, the Instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management, as part of the Internal Security Fund, and the Programme in accordance with their respective priorities and legal bases while avoiding any duplicate financing.
V vsakem primeru bi bilo treba zagotoviti nadaljnje financiranje prednostnih nalog iz programskega obdobja 2007–2013, ki so se ohranile kot cilji v okviru nove strategije EU na področju drog (2013–2020), zato bi morala biti na voljo sredstva iz programa "Zdravje za rast", Instrumenta za finančno podporo policijskemu sodelovanju, preprečevanju kriminalitete in boju proti njej, ter krizno upravljanje, kot del Sklada za notranjo varnost, in Programa v skladu z njihovimi prednostnimi nalogami in pravnimi podlagami, pri čemer bi se morali izogibati morebitnemu dvojnemu financiranju.
Pursuant to Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the "Charter") and the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Programme should support the protection of the rights of the child, including the right to due process, the right to understand the proceedings, the right to respect for private and family life and the right to integrity and dignity.
Program bi moral na podlagi člena 3(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), člena 24 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina) in Konvencije Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah iz leta 1989 podpirati varstvo otrokovih pravic, vključno s pravico do zakonitega pravnega postopka, pravico, da razumejo jezik postopka, pravico do spoštovanja zasebnosti in družinskega življenja ter pravico do osebne celovitosti in dostojanstva.
The Programme should aim, in particular, to increase child protection within justice systems and access to justice for children, and should mainstream the promotion of the rights of the child in the implementation of all of its actions.
Cilja Programa bi morala biti zlasti večja zaščita otrok v pravosodnih sistemih in dostop otrok do sodnega varstva, pri čemer bi bilo treba spodbujanje spoštovanja otrokovih pravic vključiti v izvajanje vseh ukrepov v okviru Programa.
Pursuant to Articles 8 and 10 TFEU, the Programme should support the mainstreaming of equality between women and men and non-discrimination objectives in all its activities.
V skladu s členoma 8 in 10 PDEU bi morali pri vseh dejavnostih v okviru Programa podpirati vključevanje ciljev enakosti spolov in načela nediskriminacije.
Regular monitoring and evaluation should be carried out to assess the way in which gender equality and non-discrimination issues are addressed in the Programme's activities.
Za oceno, kako se prek dejavnosti Programa rešujejo vprašanja enakosti spolov in boja proti diskriminaciji, bi bilo treba izvajati redno spremljanje in vrednotenje.
Experience of action at Union level has shown that achieving the objectives of the Programme in practice calls for a combination of instruments, including legal acts, policy initiatives and funding.
Izkušnja ukrepanja na ravni Unije je pokazala, da uresničitev ciljev Programa v praksi zahteva povezovanje instrumentov, vključno s pravnimi akti, političnimi pobudami in financiranjem.
In its conclusions of 22 and 23 September 2011 on improving the efficiency of future Union financial programmes supporting judicial cooperation, the Council stressed the important role played by Union financing programmes in the efficient implementation of the Union acquis and reiterated the need for more transparent, flexible, coherent and streamlined access to those programmes.
Svet je v sklepih o izboljšanju učinkovitosti prihodnjih finančnih programov Unije v podporo pravosodnemu sodelovanju z dne 22. in 23. septembra 2011 poudaril, da so ti programi pomembni za učinkovito izvajanje pravnega reda Unije in da je treba zagotoviti preglednejši in prožnejši ter bolj usklajen in usmerjen dostop do teh programov.
The Commission Communication of 29 June 2011 entitled 'A budget for Europe 2020' stresses the need for the rationalisation and simplification of Union funding.
V Sporočilu Komisije z naslovom „Proračun za strategijo Evropa 2020“ z dne 29. Junija 2011 je poudarjena potreba po racionalizaciji in poenostavitvi financiranja Unije.
Meaningful simplification and efficient management of funding can be achieved through a reduction in the number of programmes and through the rationalisation, simplification and harmonisation of funding rules and procedures.
Pomembna poenostavitev in učinkovito upravljanje sredstev je mogoče doseči z zmanjšanjem števila programov ter prek racionalizacije, poenostavitve in uskladitve pravil in postopkov financiranja.
The findings of those mid-term evaluations, as well as the findings of the respective ex-post evaluations, need to be taken into account in the implementation of the Programme.
Ugotovitve teh vmesnih vrednotenj in ugotovitve zadevnih naknadnih vrednotenj je treba upoštevati pri izvajanju Programa.
The Commission Communication of 19 October 2010 entitled 'The EU Budget Review' and the Commission Communication of 29 June 2011 entitled 'A budget for Europe 2020' underline the importance of focusing funding on activities with clear European added value, i.e. where Union intervention can bring additional value compared to the action of Member States alone.
V sporočilu Komisije z naslovom „Pregled proračuna EU“ z dne 19. oktobra 2010 in sporočilu Komisije z naslovom „Proračun za strategijo Evropa 2020“ z dne 29. junija 2011 je poudarjen tudi pomen osredotočenja financiranja na dejavnosti z jasno evropsko dodano vrednostjo, tj. na področjih, na katerih lahko posredovanje Unije prinese dodatno vrednost v primerjavi s samostojnim ukrepanjem držav članic.
Actions covered by this Regulation should contribute to the creation of a European area of justice by promoting the principle of mutual recognition, developing mutual trust between the Member States, increasing cross-border cooperation and networking and achieving the correct, coherent and consistent application of Union law.
Ukrepi, ki jih zajema ta uredba, bi morali prispevati k oblikovanju evropskega območja pravice s spodbujanjem načela vzajemnega priznavanja, razvijanjem zaupanja med državami članicami, povečanjem čezmejnega sodelovanja in mrežnega povezovanja ter doseganjem pravilne, skladne in dosledne uporabe prava Unije.
Funding activities should also contribute to achieving effective and better knowledge of Union law and policies by all concerned, and should provide a sound analytical basis for the support and the development of Union law and policies, in so doing contributing to their enforcement and proper implementation.
Dejavnosti financiranja bi morale prispevati tudi k temu, da bi vsi, na katere se pravo in politike Unije nanašajo, te učinkovito in bolje poznali, zagotoviti pa bi morale tudi zanesljivo analitično podlago za podporo in razvoj prava in politik Unije, s čimer bi prispevale k njihovi krepitvi in pravilnemu izvajanju.