natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The areas selected should be only those in which consistent technical rules will contribute significantly and effectively to the achievement of the objectives of the relevant legislative acts, while ensuring that policy decisions are taken by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in accordance with their usual procedures.
Izbrati bi bilo treba samo področja, na katerih je verjetno, da bodo dosledna tehnična pravila znatno in dejansko pripomogla k uresničevanju ciljev ustreznih zakonodajnih aktov in obenem zagotovila, da bodo Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija sprejemali politične odločitve v skladu s svojimi običajnimi postopki.
Matters subject to technical standards should be genuinely technical, where their development requires the expertise of supervisory experts.
Vprašanja, ki se urejajo s tehničnimi standardi, bi morala biti resnično tehnična in bi njihov razvoj zahteval strokovno znanje in izkušnje nadzornih strokovnjakov.
Regulatory technical standards adopted as delegated acts pursuant to Article 290 TFEU should further develop, specify and determine the conditions for consistent harmonisation of the rules included in the legislative acts adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, supplementing or amending certain non-essential elements thereof.
Regulativni tehnični standardi, sprejeti kot delegirani akti v skladu s členom 290 PDEU, bi morali podrobneje razviti, opredeliti in določiti pogoje za dosledno harmonizacijo pravil, vključenih v zakonodajne akte, ki sta jih sprejela Evropski parlament in Svet, tako da bodo dopolnili ali spremenili nebistvene elemente zakonodajnih aktov.
On the other hand, implementing technical standards adopted as implementing acts pursuant to Article 291 TFEU should establish conditions for the uniform application of legislative acts.
Po drugi strani pa bi morali izvedbeni tehnični standardi, sprejeti kot izvedbeni akti v skladu s členom 291 PDEU, določiti pogoje za enotno uporabo zakonodajnih aktov.
Technical standards should not involve policy choices.
Tehnični standardi ne bi smeli vključevati političnih odločitev.
In the case of regulatory technical standards it is appropriate to apply the procedure provided for in Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010, and of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, as appropriate.
Pri regulativnih tehničnih standardih je primerno, da se uporabi postopek iz členov 10 do 14 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010, Uredbe (EU) št. 1094/2010 oziroma Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010, kot je primerno.
Implementing technical standards should be adopted in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010, and of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010, as appropriate.
Izvedbene tehnične standarde bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu s postopkom iz člena 15 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010, Uredbe (EU) št. 1094/2010 in Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010, kot je primerno.
To the extent that certain requirements in Union legislative acts are not fully harmonised, and in accordance with the precautionary principle on supervision, regulatory and implementing technical standards developing, specifying or determining the conditions of application for those requirements should not prevent Member States from requiring additional information or imposing more stringent requirements.
V skladu z uredbami (EU) št. 1093/2010, (EU) št. 1094/2010 in (EU) št. 1095/2010 bi morali ESA pred predložitvijo regulativnih ali izvedbenih tehničnih standardov Komisiji po potrebi organizirati odprta javna posvetovanja o njih ter analizirati morebitne s tem povezane stroške in koristi.
Regulatory and implementing technical standards should therefore allow Member States to require additional information or impose more stringent requirements in specific areas, where those legislative acts provide for such discretion.
Obstajati bi morala tudi možnost, da bi regulativni in izvedbeni tehnični standardi določali prehodne ukrepe z ustreznimi roki, če bi bili stroški takojšnje izvedbe pretirani glede na koristi.
In accordance with Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010, before submitting regulatory or implementing technical standards to the Commission, the ESAs should, where appropriate, conduct open public consultations relating to them and analyse the potential related costs and benefits.
V času sprejemanja te direktive že nekaj časa poteka delo za pripravo in posvetovanje v zvezi s prvim sklopom ukrepov za izvajanje okvirnih pravil na podlagi Direktive 2009/138/ES.
It should be possible for regulatory and implementing technical standards to provide for transitional measures subject to adequate deadlines, if the costs of immediate implementation would be excessive compared to the benefits involved.
Za hitro dokončno oblikovanje teh ukrepov je ustrezno Komisiji dovoliti, da v skladu s postopkom za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov za prehodno obdobje sprejme regulativne tehnične standarde, določene v tej direktivi.
At the moment of adoption of this Directive, the work relating to the preparation of, and the consultation relating to, the first set of measures to implement the framework rules under Directive 2009/138/EC is well underway.
Vse spremembe teh delegiranih aktov ali – po izteku prehodnega obdobja – vse regulativne tehnične standarde za izvajanje Direktive 2009/138/ES bi bilo treba sprejeti v skladu s členi 10 do 14 Uredbe (EU) št. 1094/2010.
In the interests of an early finalisation of those measures, it is appropriate to allow the Commission, for a transitional period, to adopt the regulatory technical standards provided for in this Directive, in accordance with the procedure for the adoption of delegated acts.
Prav tako je ustrezno dovoliti EIOPA, da po prehodnem obdobju dveh let predlaga posodobitve več delegiranih aktov v obliki regulativnih tehničnih standardov.
Any amendments to such delegated acts or, after the transitional period has expired, any regulatory technical standards to implement Directive 2009/138/EC, should be adopted in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010.
Posodobitve bi morale zajemati le tehnične vidike zadevnih delegiranih aktov ter ne bi smele vsebovati strateških ali odločitev o politiki.
Furthermore, it is appropriate to allow EIOPA, after a transitional period of two years, to propose updates to a number of delegated acts in the form of regulatory technical standards.
Ko bo EIOPA pripravljal in oblikoval regulativne tehnične standarde za prilagoditev delegiranih aktov tehničnemu napredku na finančnih trgih, bi morala Komisija zagotoviti, da se informacije o področju uporabe teh osnutkov hkrati, pravočasno in ustrezno posredujejo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
Those updates should be limited to technical aspects of the relevant delegated acts and should not imply strategic decisions or policy choices.
Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010, (EU) št. 1094/2010 in (EU) št. 1095/2010 določajo mehanizem reševanja sporov med nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi.
When EIOPA is preparing and drafting regulatory technical standards to adjust delegated acts to technical developments on financial markets, the Commission should ensure simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of information on the scope of those draft regulatory technical standards to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Kadar se nacionalni nadzorni organ ne strinja s postopkom ali vsebino ukrepanja ali neukrepanja drugega nacionalnega nadzornega organa na področjih, opredeljenih v zakonodajnih aktih Unije v skladu z navedenimi uredbami, na katerih zadevni zakonodajni akt zahteva sodelovanje, usklajevanje ali skupno odločanje nacionalnih nadzornih organov iz več kot ene države članice, bi moral biti zadevni ESA na zahtevo enega od zadevnih nacionalnih nadzornih organov zmožen pomagati tem organom pri doseganju sporazuma v roku, ki ga določi ESA in ki bi moral upoštevati morebitne pomembne roke v zadevni zakonodaji ter nujnost in zapletenost spora.
Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 provide for a mechanism to settle disagreements between national supervisory authorities.
Če se spor ne reši, bi ga moral biti zmožen rešiti ESA.
Where a national supervisory authority disagrees with the procedure or content of an action or inaction by another national supervisory authority in areas specified in Union legislative acts in accordance with those Regulations, and the relevant legislative act requires cooperation, coordination or joint decision-making by national supervisory authorities from more than one Member State, the ESA concerned, at the request of one of the national supervisory authorities concerned, should be able to assist the authorities in reaching an agreement within the time-limit set by the ESA which should take into account any relevant time-limits in the relevant legislation, and the urgency and complexity of the disagreement.
Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010, (EU) št. 1094/2010 in (EU) št. 1095/2010 zahtevajo, da morajo biti primeri, ko se lahko uporabijo mehanizmi reševanja sporov med nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi, določeni v sektorski zakonodaji.
In the event that such disagreement persists, the ESA should be able to settle the matter.
V direktivi bi bilo treba določiti prvi sklop tovrstnih primerov v sektorju zavarovalnic in pozavarovalnic ter pri tem ne izključiti dodajanja nadaljnjih primerov v prihodnosti.
Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 require that the cases where the mechanism to settle disagreements between national supervisory authorities may be applied are to be specified in the sectoral legislation.
Direktiva ne sme onemogočati ESA, da delujejo v skladu z drugimi pooblastili ali da izpolnjujejo naloge, opredeljene v uredbah (EU) št. 1093/2010, (EU) št. 1094/2010 in (EU) št. 1095/2010, vključno z nezavezujočo mediacijo in prispevanjem k dosledni, smotrni in učinkoviti uporabi prava Unije.
This Directive should identify a first set of such cases in the insurance and reinsurance sector, without prejudice to adding further cases in the future.
Poleg tega so na tistih področjih, kjer je v ustreznem pravu že vzpostavljena oblika nezavezujočega postopka mediacije ali kjer so določeni roki za sprejetje skupnih odločitev enega ali več nacionalnih nadzornih organov, potrebne spremembe za zagotovitev jasnosti in čim manjšega oviranja postopka sprejemanja skupne odločitve ter za zagotovitev možnosti, da lahko spore po potrebi rešujejo ESA.
This Directive should not prevent the ESAs from acting in accordance with other powers or fulfilling tasks specified in Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010, including non-binding mediation and contributing to the consistent, efficient and effective application of Union law.
Zavezujoči postopek za reševanje sporov je zasnovan za reševanje primerov, ko nacionalni nadzorni organi med seboj ne morejo rešiti postopkovnih ali vsebinskih vprašanj, povezanih s skladnostjo s pravom Unije.
Moreover, in those areas where some form of non-binding mediation is already established in the relevant law, or where there are time-limits for joint decisions to be taken by one or more national supervisory authorities, amendments are needed to ensure clarity and minimum disruption of the process for reaching a joint decision, but also to ensure that, where necessary, the ESAs should be able to resolve disagreements.
V tej direktivi bi bilo treba torej določiti primere, ko bo morda potrebno reševati postopkovno ali vsebinsko vprašanje skladnosti z zakonodajo Unije in ga nacionalni nadzorni organi morda ne bodo mogli sami rešiti.
The binding procedure for the settlement of disagreements is designed to solve situations where national supervisory authorities cannot resolve, among themselves, procedural or substantive issues relating to compliance with Union law.
V takem primeru bi morala obstajati možnost, da kateri od teh nacionalnih nadzornih organov sproži vprašanje pri zadevni ESA.
This Directive should therefore identify situations where a procedural or a substantive issue of compliance with Union law may need to be resolved and the national supervisory authorities may not be able to resolve the matter on their own.
Ta bi moral delovati v skladu z uredbo o njegovi ustanovitvi in s to direktivo.
In such a situation, one of the national supervisory authorities concerned should be able to raise the issue with the ESA concerned.
Imeti bi moral tudi možnost zahtevati od zadevnih nacionalnih nadzornih organov, da sprejmejo ustrezen ukrep ali da ne ukrepajo ter tako uredijo zadevo in zagotovijo skladnost s pravom Unije z zavezujočimi učinki za zadevne nacionalne nadzorne organe.
That ESA should act in accordance with its establishing regulation and with this Directive.
V primerih, kadar ustrezen zakonodajni akt Unije podeljuje pristojnost državam članicam, odločitve, ki jih sprejme ESA, ne bi smele nadomeščati uveljavljanja diskrecijske pravice nacionalnih nadzornih organov, kadar je to uveljavljanje v skladu s pravom Unije.
It should be able to require that the national supervisory authorities concerned take specific action or refrain from action in order to settle the matter and ensure compliance with Union law, with binding effects on the national supervisory authorities concerned.
Direktiva 2009/138/ES določa skupne odločitve glede odobritve vlog za uporabo notranjega modela na ravni skupine ali hčerinskega podjetja, odobritve vlog za dovoljenje, da se za hčerinsko podjetje uporabljata člena 238 in 239 navedene direktive, in določitve nadzornika skupine na drugačni podlagi od meril iz člena 247 navedene direktive.
In cases where the relevant legislative act of the Union confers discretion on Member States, decisions taken by an ESA should not replace the exercise of discretion by the national supervisory authorities, where that exercise is in accordance with Union law.
Na vseh teh področjih je treba sprejeti spremembo, ki bo jasno določala, da lahko v primeru spora EIOPA reši spor z uporabo postopka iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1094/2010.
Directive 2009/138/EC provides for joint decisions as regards the approval of applications to use an internal model at group and subsidiary levels, the approval of applications to make a subsidiary subject to Articles 238 and 239 of that Directive and the identification of the group supervisor on a different basis from the criteria set out in Article 247 thereof.
Pri navedenem pristopu je jasno, da EIOPA sicer ne bi smel nadomeščati uveljavljanja diskrecijske pravice nacionalnih nadzornih organov, vendar bi moralo biti mogoče rešiti spore in okrepiti sodelovanje, preden nacionalni nadzorni organ sprejme dokončno odločitev ali jo posreduje instituciji.
In all of those areas, an amendment should clearly state that, in the event of disagreement, EIOPA may resolve the disagreement using the process laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010.
EIOPA bi moral reševati spore z mediacijo med nasprotujočimi si stališči nacionalnih nadzornih organov.
That approach makes it clear that, while EIOPA should not replace the exercise of discretion by the national supervisory authorities, it should be possible for disagreements to be resolved and cooperation to be strengthened before a final decision is taken by the national supervisory authority or issued to an institution.
Nacionalni nadzorni organi bodo morali v skladu z novo strukturo nadzora, ki jo določa evropski sistem finančnega nadzora, tesno sodelovati z ESA.
EIOPA should resolve disagreements by mediating between the conflicting views of the national supervisory authorities.
Spremembe ustreznih zakonodajnih aktov bi morale zagotoviti, da ne bo pravnih ovir pri izpolnjevanju zahtev glede izmenjave informacij, ki so vključene v uredbah (EU) št. 1093/2010, (EU) št. 1094/2010 in (EU) št. 1095/2010, in da zagotavljanje podatkov ne bo pomenilo nepotrebnega administrativnega bremena.
The new supervisory architecture established by the ESFS will require national supervisory authorities to cooperate closely with the ESAs.
Zavarovalnice in pozavarovalnice bi morale biti dolžne svojim nacionalnim nadzornim organom posredovati le take informacije, pomembne za namene nadzora, upoštevaje cilje nadzora iz Direktive 2009/138/ES.
Amendments to the relevant legislative acts should ensure that there are no legal obstacles to the information-sharing obligations included in Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 and that the provision of data does not give rise to an unnecessary administrative burden.
Posredovanje popolnega seznama sredstev po posameznih postavkah in drugih informacij več kot enkrat letno bi bilo treba zahtevati le, če bi dodaten vpogled, ki bi ga nacionalni nadzorni organi pridobili za namene spremljanja finančne trdnosti teh podjetij ali ob upoštevanju možnega učinka njihovih odločitev na finančno stabilnost, prevladala nad bremenom izračunavanja in posredovanja teh informacij.
Insurance and reinsurance undertakings should be required only to provide such information to their national supervisory authorities that is relevant for the purposes of supervision, taking into account the objectives of supervision as laid down in Directive 2009/138/EC.
Nacionalni nadzorni organi bi morali biti po oceni narave, obsega in zahtevnosti tveganj, ki so del poslov podjetja, pooblaščeni, da mu dovolijo omejitve glede pogostosti in obsega poročanja ali ga izvzamejo iz poročanja po posameznih postavkah le, če ne preseže določenih pragov.
Information on a full list of assets to be provided on an item-by-item basis and other information to be provided more frequently than annually should be required only where the additional knowledge obtained by the national supervisory authorities for the purpose of monitoring the financial health of the undertakings, or taking into account the potential impacts of their decisions on financial stability, outweighs the burden associated with the calculation and submission of that information.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da bodo najmanjša podjetja upravičena do omejitev in izvzetja in da ne bodo predstavljala več od 20-odstotnega deleža na trgu države članice za življenjska in neživljenjska zavarovanja in pozavarovanja.
After assessing the nature, scale and complexity of the risks inherent in the business of the undertaking, national supervisory authorities should have the power to allow limitations on the frequency and the scope of information to be reported or to exempt from reporting on an item-by-item basis only where that undertaking does not exceed specific thresholds.
Da bi nacionalni nadzorni organi zagotovili natančnost in popolnost informacij, ki jih sporočajo udeležene zavarovalnice in pozavarovalnice ali zavarovalni holdingi na ravni skupine, podjetjem, ki so del skupine, ne bi smeli dovoliti omejitev glede teh informacij ali jih izvzeti iz poročanja po posameznih postavkah, razen če bi bilo po mnenju nacionalnega nadzornega organa poročanje neustrezno glede na naravo, obseg in zahtevnost tveganj, ki so del poslov skupine.
It should be ensured that the smallest undertakings are eligible for limitations and exemption and that those undertakings do not represent more than 20 % of a Member State's life and non-life insurance or of its reinsurance market.
Na področjih, kjer ima Komisija na podlagi Direktive 2009/138/ES zdaj pooblastila za sprejemanje izvedbenih ukrepov in gre pri tem za nezakonodajne splošne akte, ki dopolnjujejo ali spreminjajo nekatere nebistvene elemente navedene direktive v smislu člena 290 PDEU, bi bilo treba nanjo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v skladu z navedenim členom ali regulativnih tehničnih standardov v skladu s členi 10 do 14 Uredbe (EU) št. 1094/2010.
In order to ensure that the information reported by participating insurance and reinsurance undertakings or insurance holding companies at the level of the group is accurate and complete, national supervisory authorities should not allow limitations on the information to be reported or exempt from reporting on an item-by-item basis undertakings which belong to a group, unless the national supervisory authority is satisfied that reporting would be inappropriate given the nature, scale and complexity of the risks inherent in the business of the group.
Da bi zagotovili enakovredno obravnavanje vseh zavarovalnic in pozavarovalnic, ki izračunavajo zahtevani solventnostni kapital iz Direktive 2009/138/ES na podlagi standardne formule, ali da bi upoštevali razvoj dogodkov na trgu, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov v zvezi z izračunom zahtevanega solventnostnega kapitala na podlagi standardne formule.
In areas where the Commission is currently empowered by Directive 2009/138/EC to adopt implementing measures, where those measures are non-legislative acts of general application to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of that Directive in the sense of Article 290 TFEU, the Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with that Article or regulatory technical standards in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010.
Kadar tveganja niso ustrezno zajeta v podmodulu, bi moral biti EIOPA pooblaščen za pripravo osnutkov regulativnih tehničnih standardov v zvezi s količinskimi omejitvami in merili primernosti sredstev za zahtevani solventnostni kapital na podlagi standardne formule.
In order to ensure that the same treatment is applied to all insurance and reinsurance undertakings calculating the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) pursuant to Directive 2009/138/EC on the basis of the standard formula, or to take account of market developments, the Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in relation to the calculation of the SCR on the basis of the standard formula.
Da se omogoči dosledno izračunavanje zavarovalno-tehničnih rezervacij s strani zavarovalnic in pozavarovalnic po določbah Direktive 2009/138/ES, mora centralni organ redno izračunavati, objavljati in posodabljati nekatere tehnične informacije v zvezi z ustrezno časovno strukturo netvegane obrestne mere in upoštevati ugotovitve na finančnih trgih.
Where risks are not adequately covered by a sub-module, EIOPA should be empowered to develop draft regulatory technical standards in relation to quantitative limits and asset eligibility criteria for the SCR on the basis of the standard formula.
Način za izračun ustrezne časovne strukture netvegane obrestne mere bi moral biti pregleden.
In order to allow for the consistent calculation of technical provisions by insurance and reinsurance undertakings under Directive 2009/138/EC, it is necessary for a central body to derive, publish, and update certain technical information relating to the relevant risk-free interest rate term structure on a regular basis, taking account of observations in the financial market.
Ker so te naloge tehnične narave in so povezane z zavarovalništvom, bi jih moral izvajati EIOPA.
The manner in which the relevant risk-free interest rate term structure is derived should be transparent.
Pri ustrezni časovni strukturi netvegane obrestne mere bi bilo treba preprečiti umetno nestanovitnost zavarovalno-tehničnih rezervacij in primernega lastniškega kapitala.
Given the technical and insurance-related nature of those tasks, they should be carried out by EIOPA.
Izbira izhodišča za ekstrapolacijo netveganih obrestnih mer bi morala omogočiti zavarovalnicam in pozavarovalnicam, da denarne tokove izenačijo z obveznicami, ki so pri izračunu najboljše ocene diskontirane z neekstrapoliranimi obrestnimi merami.
The relevant risk-free interest rate term structure should avoid artificial volatility of technical provisions and eligible own funds and provide an incentive for good risk management.
Pod podobnimi tržnimi pogoji, kot veljajo na datum začetka veljavnosti te direktive, bi moralo biti izhodišče za ekstrapolacijo netveganih obrestnih mer, predvsem za euro, zapadlost po 20 letih.