natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on the non-commercial movement of pet animals and repealing Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 [5] repeals and replaces Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
Uredba (EU) št. 576/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. junija 2013 o netrgovskih premikih hišnih živali in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 [5] razveljavlja in nadomešča Uredbo (ES) št. 998/2003.
Measures adopted to facilitate the transition to the arrangements of Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 are therefore obsolete.
Ukrepi, sprejeti za olajšanje prehoda na ureditve iz Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003, so zastareli.
Decisions 2004/301/EC and 2004/539/EC should therefore be repealed.
Odločbi 2004/301/ES in 2004/539/ES bi bilo zato treba razveljaviti.
In addition, Commission Regulation (EU) No 388/2010 of 6 May 2010 implementing Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the maximum number of pet animals of certain species that may be the subject of non-commercial movement [6] was adopted in order to avoid the risk of commercial movements of dogs, cats and ferrets being fraudulently disguised as non-commercial movements, when those animals are moved into a Member State from another Member State or a third country listed in Section 2 of Part B of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
Poleg tega je bila sprejeta Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 388/2010 z dne 6. maja 2010 o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z največjim številom nekaterih vrst hišnih živali, ki so lahko predmet netrgovskega premika [6], da se prepreči tveganje goljufivega prikrivanja trgovskih premikov kot netrgovske premike psov, mačk in belih dihurjev, kadar gre za premik navedenih živali v državo članico iz druge države članice ali iz tretje države s seznama v oddelku 2 dela B Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 998/2003.
The provisions of Regulation (EU) No 388/2010 have been reviewed and included in Regulation (EU) No 576/2013.
Določbe Uredbe (EU) št. 388/2010 so bile pregledane in vključene v Uredbo (EU) št. 576/2013.
Decisions 2004/301/EC and 2004/539/EC are repealed.
Odločbi 2004/301/ES in 2004/539/ES se razveljavita.
Regulation (EU) No 388/2010 is repealed with effect from 29 December 2014.
Uredba (EU) št. 388/2010 se razveljavi z učinkom od 29. decembra 2014.
Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 applies from 29 December 2014.
Uredba (EU) št. 576/2013 se uporablja od 29. decembra 2014.
Regulation (EU) No 388/2010 therefore becomes obsolete on the date of application of Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 and should therefore be repealed with effect from that date.
Uredba (EU) št. 388/2010 bo od datuma začetka uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 576/2013 tako postala zastarela in bi jo zato bilo treba razveljaviti z učinkom od navedenega datuma.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 32/2014
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 32/2014
initiating a ‘new exporter’ review of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China as amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013, repealing the duty with regard to imports of one exporter in this country and making such imports subject to registration
o začetku pregleda Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1008/2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 372/2013, v zvezi z novim izvoznikom, odpravo dajatve na uvoz od enega izvoznika iz te države in uvedbo registracije za takšen uvoz
The European Commission (‘the Commission’) has received a request for a ‘new exporter’ review under Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je prejela zahtevek za pregled v zvezi z novim izvoznikom v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged on 3 May 2013 by Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd (‘the applicant’), an exporting producer of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts in the People’s Republic of China (‘the country concerned’).
Zahtevek je 3. maja 2013 vložila družba Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd. („vložnik“), proizvajalec izvoznik ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov v Ljudski republiki Kitajski („zadevna država“).
The product under review is hand pallet trucks and their essential parts, i.e. chassis and hydraulics, currently falling within CN codes ex84279000 (TARIC codes 8427900011 and 8427900019) and ex84312000 (TARIC codes 8431200011 and 8431200019) and originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Izdelek, ki se pregleduje, so ročni vozički za premeščanje palet in njihovi osnovni deli, tj. šasija in hidravlika, ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznaki KN ex84279000 (oznaki TARIC 8427900011 in 8427900019) ter ex84312000 (oznaki TARIC 8431200011 in 8431200019), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The measures currently in force are a definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 [2] as amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 [3], under which imports into the Union of the product under review, including the product produced by the applicant, are subject to a definitive anti-dumping duty of 70,8 %.
Trenutno veljavni ukrep je dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 1008/2011 [2], kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 372/2013 [3], v skladu s katero za uvoz izdelka, ki se pregleduje, v Unijo, vključno z izdelkom, ki ga proizvaja vložnik, velja dokončna protidampinška dajatev v višini 70,8 %.
The measures are also applicable to imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts consigned from Thailand whether declared as originating in Thailand or not pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 [4].
Ukrep se v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 499/2009 [4] uporablja tudi za uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov, poslanih iz Tajske, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelek s poreklom iz Tajske ali ne.
The applicant claims that it operates under market economy conditions as defined in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Vložnik trdi, da posluje pod pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, kot so opredeljeni v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
It further claims that it did not export the product under review to the Union during the investigation period on which the anti-dumping measures were based, i.e. the period from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 (‘the original investigation period’).
Nadalje trdi, da v obdobju preiskave, to je od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004 („prvotno obdobje preiskave“), na katerem so temeljili protidampinški ukrepi, izdelka, ki se pregleduje, ni izvažal v Unijo.
Furthermore, the applicant claims that it is not related to any of the exporting producers of the product under review which are subject to the above-mentioned anti-dumping measures.
Poleg tega trdi, da ni povezan z nobenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom izdelka, ki se pregleduje, za katerega veljajo zgoraj navedeni protidampinški ukrepi.
The applicant further claims that it has begun exporting the product under review to the Union after the end of the original investigation period.
Vložnik tudi trdi, da je začel izdelek, ki se pregleduje, v Unijo izvažati po koncu obdobja prvotne preiskave.
Having examined the evidence available, the Commission concludes that there is sufficient evidence to justify the initiation of a ‘new exporter’ review, pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, with a view to determine the applicant’s individual margin of dumping and, should dumping be found, the level of the duty to which its imports of the product under review into the Union shall be subject.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih dokazov je Komisija sklenila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi, ki upravičujejo začetek pregleda v zvezi z novim izvoznikom v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe, da se za vložnika določi individualna stopnja dampinga, v primeru odkritja dampinga pa tudi stopnja dajatve za uvoz izdelka, ki se pregleduje, v Unijo.
Upon receipt of the claim for market economy treatment, it will be determined whether the applicant operates under market economy conditions as defined in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Po prejemu zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo se bo določilo, ali vložnik posluje pod pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, kot so opredeljeni v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
If it is determined that the applicant fulfils the requirements to have an individual duty established, it may be necessary to amend the rate of duty currently applicable under Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013.
Če se ugotovi, da vložnik izpolnjuje zahteve za določitev individualne dajatve, bo morda treba prilagoditi stopnjo dajatve, ki se trenutno uporablja v skladu s členom 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1008/2011, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 372/2013.
All interested parties are hereby invited to make their views known in writing and to provide supporting evidence.
Vse zainteresirane strani so pozvane, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in predložijo ustrezne dokaze.
Union producers known to be concerned have been informed of the request for a review and have been given an opportunity to comment.
Proizvajalci Unije, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, so bili obveščeni o zahtevku za pregled in imeli so možnost, da predložijo pripombe.
Furthermore, the Commission may hear interested parties, provided that they make a request in writing showing that there are particular reasons why they should be heard.
Poleg tega lahko Komisija zasliši zainteresirane strani, če te vložijo pisni zahtevek za zaslišanje in navedejo posebne razloge zanj, zaradi katerih bi morale biti zaslišane.
If the applicant provides sufficient evidence that it operates under market economy conditions, i.e. that it meets the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, normal value will be determined in accordance with Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Če vložnik predloži zadostne dokaze o tem, da posluje pod pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, tj. da izpolnjuje merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, bo normalna vrednost določena v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe.
For this purpose, duly substantiated claims must be submitted within the specific time limit set in Article 4 of this Regulation.
V ta namen mora predložiti ustrezno utemeljene zahtevke v posebnem roku iz člena 4 te uredbe.
The Commission will send a claim form to the applicant, as well as to the authorities of the People’s Republic of China.
Komisija bo vložniku in organom Ljudske republike Kitajske poslala obrazec zahtevka.
If the applicant is not granted market economy treatment, an appropriate market economy country will be used for the purpose of establishing normal value for the People’s Republic of China in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Če se vložniku ne odobri tržnogospodarska obravnava, se za določitev normalne vrednosti za Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe uporabi primerna država s tržnim gospodarstvom.
The Commission envisages using Brazil for this purpose as was done in the investigation which led to the imposition of measures on imports from the People’s Republic of China.
Kakor v preiskavi, ki je privedla do uvedbe ukrepov za uvoz iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, namerava Komisija v ta namen ponovno uporabiti Brazilijo.
Interested parties are invited to comment on the appropriateness of this choice within the specific time limit set in Article 4 of this Regulation.
Zainteresirane strani so pozvane, da v roku iz člena 4 te uredbe predložijo pripombe o ustreznosti te izbire.
If the applicant is granted market economy treatment but reliable required data are not available in the People’s Republic of China, the Commission may, if necessary, also use findings concerning the normal value established in an appropriate market-economy country, e.g. for the purpose of replacing any unreliable cost or price elements in the People’s Republic of China which are needed in establishing the normal value.
Če se vložniku odobri tržnogospodarska obravnava, vendar v Ljudski republiki Kitajski ni na voljo zanesljivih informacij, lahko Komisija po potrebi uporabi tudi ugotovitve glede normalne vrednosti, določene v ustrezni državi s tržnim gospodarstvom, na primer za zamenjavo nezanesljivih stroškovnih ali cenovnih elementov v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, ki so potrebni za določitev normalne vrednosti.
The Commission envisages using Brazil also for this purpose.
Komisija namerava tudi v ta namen uporabiti Brazilijo.
At the same time, such imports should be made subject to registration in accordance with Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, in order to ensure that, should the review result in a finding of dumping in respect of the applicant, anti-dumping duties can be levied from the date of the registration of these imports.
Hkrati je treba v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe za tak uvoz uvesti obvezno registracijo, s čimer se zagotovi, da se protidampinške dajatve obračunajo od datuma registracije tega uvoza, če se pri pregledu vložnika ugotovi damping.
The amount of the applicant’s possible future liabilities cannot be estimated at this stage of the investigation.
V tej fazi preiskave ni mogoče določiti zneska vložnikovih morebitnih prihodnjih obveznosti.
interested parties may make themselves known to the Commission, present their views in writing and submit any information to be taken into account during the investigation,
se lahko zainteresirane strani javijo Komisiji, pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in predložijo kakršne koli informacije, ki bi jih bilo treba upoštevati med preiskavo,
interested parties may make a written request to be heard by the Commission,
lahko zainteresirane strani pisno zahtevajo zaslišanje pred Komisijo,
interested parties may comment on the appropriateness of the use of Brazil as explained in recitals 16 and 17 above,
lahko zainteresirane strani predložijo pripombe o ustreznosti Brazilije, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 16 in 17.
Attention is drawn to the fact that the exercise of most procedural rights set out in the basic Regulation depends on the party’s making itself known within the time limits indicated in Article 4 of this Regulation.
Opozoriti je treba, da je uveljavljanje večine pravic v postopku, določenih v osnovni uredbi, odvisno od tega, ali se stran javi v roku iz člena 4 te uredbe.
In cases in which any interested party refuses access to or does not provide the necessary information within the time limits, or significantly impedes the investigation, findings, affirmative or negative, may be made in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, on the basis of the facts available.
Če katera koli zainteresirana stran zavrne dostop do potrebnih informacij, jih ne predloži v rokih ali znatno ovira preiskavo, se lahko v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev sprejmejo ugotovitve, in sicer pozitivne ali negativne.
If an interested party has supplied false or misleading information, the information shall be disregarded and use may be made of facts available.
Če je katera koli zainteresirana stran predložila napačne ali zavajajoče informacije, se te informacije ne upoštevajo, uporabijo pa se lahko razpoložljiva dejstva.
Failure to give a computerised response shall not be deemed to constitute non-cooperation, provided that the interested party shows that presenting the response as requested would result in an unreasonable extra burden or unreasonable additional cost.
Če se odgovor ne posreduje v računalniški obliki, se to ne šteje kot nesodelovanje, pod pogojem, da zainteresirana stran dokaže, da bi ji posredovanje odgovora v zahtevani obliki povzročilo nerazumno dodatno obremenitev ali nerazumne dodatne stroške.
The interested party should immediately contact the Commission.
Zainteresirana stran bi morala takoj obvestiti Komisijo.
The investigation will be concluded, pursuant to Article 11(5) of the basic Regulation, within nine months of the date of the publication of this Regulation in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Preiskava se v skladu s členom 11(5) osnovne uredbe zaključi v devetih mesecih od datuma objave te uredbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
It is noted that any personal data collected in this investigation will be treated in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [5].
Vsi osebni podatki, zbrani v tej preiskavi, bodo obravnavani v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [5].
Interested parties may request the intervention of the Hearing Officer of the Directorate-General for Trade.
Zainteresirane strani lahko zahtevajo posredovanje pooblaščenca za zaslišanje iz GD za trgovino.
The Hearing Officer may organise a hearing with an individual interested party and mediate to ensure that the interested party’s rights of defence are being fully exercised.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje lahko s posamezno zainteresirano stranjo organizira zaslišanje in nastopi kot posrednik, da se v celoti upoštevajo njene pravice do obrambe.
The Hearing Officer will provide opportunities for a hearing involving parties which would allow different views to be presented and rebuttal arguments offered.
Pooblaščenec za zaslišanje udeleženim stranem prav tako omogoči, da med zaslišanjem predstavijo različna stališča in nasprotne argumente.
A request for a hearing with the Hearing Officer should be made in writing within the specific deadlines set by the Commission in its communication with the parties.
Zahtevek za zaslišanje pri pooblaščencu za zaslišanje je treba vložiti pisno v posebnih rokih, ki jih določi Komisija v korespondenci s stranmi.
The party should specify the reasons for the request.
V njem je treba navesti razloge za zaslišanje.
For further information and contact details interested parties may consult the Hearing Officer’s web pages on the Directorate-General for Trade’s website: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/degucht/contact/hearing-officer/
Dodatne informacije in kontaktni podatki so zainteresiranim stranem na voljo na spletnih straneh pooblaščenca za zaslišanje na spletišču Generalnega direktorata za trgovino: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/degucht/contact/hearing-officer/ –
A review of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 is hereby initiated under Article 11(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 in order to determine if and to what extent the imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts, currently falling within CN codes ex84279000 (TARIC codes 8427900011 and 8427900019) and ex84312000 (TARIC codes 8431200011 and 8431200019) and originating in the People’s Republic of China, produced and sold for export to the Union by Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd (TARIC additional code A070) should be subject to the anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 or that an individual anti-dumping duty should be imposed.
V skladu s členom 11(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 se začne pregled Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1008/2011, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 372/2013, da se določi, ali in v kolikšnem obsegu naj za uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov, ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznaki KN ex84279000 (oznaki TARIC 8427900011 in 8427900019) ter ex84312000 (oznaki TARIC 8431200011 in 8431200019), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki jih za izvoz v Unijo proizvaja in prodaja Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd. (dodatna oznaka TARIC A070), velja protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1008/2011, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 372/2013, oziroma ali naj se uvede individualna protidampinška dajatev.
The hand pallet trucks are only designed to raise a load, by pumping the tiller, to a height sufficient for transporting and do not have any other additional functions or uses such as for example (i) to move and to lift the loads in order to place them higher or assist in storage of loads (highlifters); (ii) to stack one pallet above the other (stackers); (iii) to lift the load to a working level (scissorlifts); or (iv) to lift and to weigh the loads (weighing trucks).
Ročni vozički za premeščanje palet imajo le eno funkcijo, in sicer da z zamahovanjem krmila omogočijo dvigovanje tovora do višine, primerne za prevažanje, in nimajo nobenih drugih dodatnih funkcij ali uporab, kot na primer (i) premeščanje ali dvigovanje tovora na višji nivo ali pomoč pri skladiščenju tovora (dvigalne naprave); (ii) nakladanje ene palete na drugo (nakladalniki); (iii) dvigovanje tovora na delovno površino (škarjasta dvigala); ali (iv) dvigovanje in tehtanje tovora (vozički za tehtanje).
The anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 is hereby repealed with regard to the imports identified in Article 1 of the present Regulation.
Protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1008/2011, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 372/2013, se odpravi za uvoz iz člena 1 te uredbe.
The Customs authorities shall, pursuant to Article 11(4) and Article 14(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009, take the appropriate steps to register the imports into the Union identified in Article 1 of this Regulation.
Carinski organi v skladu s členom 11(4) in členom 14(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza v Unijo iz člena 1 te uredbe.
Interested parties, if their representations are to be taken into account during the investigation, must make themselves known by contacting the Commission, present their views in writing and submit a reply to the questionnaire indicated in recital (12) of this Regulation or any information to be taken into account within 37 days from the date of entry into force of this Regulation, unless otherwise specified.
Če zainteresirane strani želijo, da se med preiskavo upoštevajo njihova stališča, se morajo javiti Komisiji, pisno predstaviti svoja stališča in predložiti izpolnjen vprašalnik iz uvodne izjave 12 te uredbe ali kakršne koli druge informacije, ki naj se upoštevajo, v 37 dneh po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe, če ni določeno drugače.
Interested parties may also apply to be heard by the Commission within the same 37-day time-limit.
Zainteresirane strani lahko v istem 37-dnevnem roku zaprosijo tudi za zaslišanje pred Komisijo.
A duly substantiated claim for market economy treatment must reach the Commission within 37 days of the date of the entry into force of this Regulation.
Komisija mora ustrezno utemeljen zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo prejeti v 37 dneh po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
Parties to the investigation wanting to comment on the appropriateness of Brazil, which is envisaged as a market economy third country, must submit their comments within 10 days of the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Strani v preiskavi, ki želijo izraziti svoje stališče glede ustreznosti Brazilije, ki je predvidena kot tretja država s tržnim gospodarstvom, morajo svoje pripombe predložiti v 10 dneh po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.