natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Decision 2004/292/EC of 30 March 2004 on the introduction of the Traces system (OJ L 94, 31.3.2004, p. 63).
Odločba Komisije 2004/292/ES z dne 30. marca 2004 o uvedbi sistema Traces (UL L 94, 31.3.2004, str. 63).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 282/2004 of 18 February 2004 introducing a document for the declaration of, and veterinary checks on, animals from third countries entering the Community (OJ L 49, 19.2.2004, p. 11).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 282/2004 z dne 18. februarja 2004 o uvedbi dokumenta za deklariranje in veterinarske preglede živali iz tretjih držav, ki vstopajo v Skupnost (UL L 49, 19.2.2004, str. 11).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 599/2004 of 30 March 2004 concerning the adoption of a harmonised model certificate and inspection report linked to intra-Community trade in animals and products of animal origin (OJ L 94, 31.3.2004, p. 44).
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 599/2004 z dne 30. marca 2004 o sprejetju usklajenega vzorca spričevala in inšpekcijskega poročila, povezanima s trgovino z živalmi in proizvodi živalskega izvora med državami članicami Skupnosti (UL L 94, 31.3.2004, str. 44).
Commission Decision 2009/821/EC of 28 September 2009 drawing up a list of approved border inspection posts, laying down certain rules on the inspections carried out by Commission veterinary experts and laying down the veterinary units in Traces (OJ L 296, 12.11.2009, p. 1).
Odločba Komisije 2009/821/ES z dne 28. septembra 2009 o sestavi seznama odobrenih mejnih kontrolnih točk, določitvi nekaterih pravil za kontrolne preglede, ki jih izvajajo veterinarski strokovnjaki Komisije, in določitvi veterinarskih enot v Traces (UL L 296, 12.11.2009, str. 1).
OJ L 200, 9.7.2014. p.
UL L 200, 9.7.2014, str.
amending Decision 2003/467/EC as regards the declaration of Estonia as officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free Member State
o spremembi Odločbe 2003/467/ES glede priznanja Estonije kot države članice, uradno proste enzootske goveje levkoze
(notified under document C(2014) 4547)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 4547)
Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine [1], and in particular point E in Chapter I of Annex D thereto,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 64/432/EGS z dne 26. junija 1964 o problemih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki vplivajo na trgovino z govedom in prašiči znotraj Skupnosti [1], in zlasti točke E v poglavju I Priloge D k Direktivi,
Annex III to Commission Decision 2003/467/EC [2] lists the Member States and regions thereof which are declared officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis -free.
V Prilogi III k Odločbi Komisije 2003/467/ES [2] so navedene države članice in regije držav članic, ki se priznajo kot uradno proste enzootske goveje levkoze.
Estonia has submitted to the Commission documentation demonstrating compliance with the conditions for the officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free status laid down in Directive 64/432/EEC for its whole territory.
Estonija je Komisiji predložila dokumentacijo o skladnosti s pogoji iz Direktive 64/432/EGS za podelitev celotnemu območju navedene države statusa države, uradno proste enzootske goveje levkoze.
Following the evaluation of the documentation submitted by Estonia, that Member-State should be declared officially enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free.
Po pregledu dokumentacije, ki jo je predložila Estonija, bi bilo treba navedeno državo članico priznati kot uradno prosto enzootske goveje levkoze.
Annex III to Decision 2003/467/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo III k Odločbi 2003/467/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977/64.
UL 121, 29.7.1964, str. 1977/64.
Commission Decision 2003/467/EC of 23 June 2003 establishing the official tuberculosis, brucellosis and enzootic-bovine-leukosis-free status of certain Member States and regions of Member States as regards bovine herds (OJ L 156, 25.6.2003, p. 74).
Odločba Komisije 2003/467/ES z dne 23. junija 2003 o uvedbi statusa nekaterih držav članic in regij držav članic, uradno prostih tuberkuloze, bruceloze in enzootske goveje levkoze glede čred goveda (UL L 156, 25.6.2003, str. 74).
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
Whereas:
Člen 2
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
ob upoštevanju Protokola o statutu Sodišča Evropske unije in zlasti drugega odstavka člena 62c Protokola,
Article 1
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 979/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o začasnih sodnikih Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije [1] in zlasti prvega odstavka člena 4,
Article 2
Zato bi bilo treba sprejeti sklep o izbrisu imena Harisa TAGARASA s seznama začasnih sodnikov Sodišča za uslužbence, določenega na podlagi Sklepa 2013/181/EU [2] –
Done at Brussels, 8 July 2014.
Ta sklep začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
For the Council
UL L 303, 31.10.2012, str. 83.
The President
Sklep Sveta 2013/181/EU z dne 22. aprila 2013 o določitvi seznama treh začasnih sodnikov Sodišča za uslužbence (UL L 111, 23.4.2013, str. 49).
Decision No 445/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
Sklep št. 445/2014/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
establishing a Union action for the European Capitals of Culture for the years 2020 to 2033 and repealing Decision No 1622/2006/EC
o vzpostavitvi aktivnosti Unije za Evropske prestolnice kulture za leta od 2020 do 2033 in o razveljavitvi Sklepa št. 1622/2006/ES
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first indent of Article 167(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prve alineje člena 167(5) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the opinions of the Committee of the Regions [1],
ob upoštevanju mnenj Odbora regij [1],
The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) aims at an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe and confers on the Union the task, inter alia, of contributing to the flowering of the cultures of the Member States, while respecting their national and regional diversity and at the same time bringing the common cultural heritage to the fore.
Cilj Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) je vse tesnejša zveza med narodi Evrope in daje Uniji nalogo, da med drugim prispeva k razcvetu kultur držav članic in pri tem upošteva njihovo nacionalno in regionalno raznolikost ter hkrati poudarja skupno kulturno dediščino.
In this respect, the Union, where necessary, supports and supplements Member States' action to improve the knowledge and dissemination of the culture and history of the European peoples.
Unija pri tem po potrebi podpira in dopolnjuje aktivnosti držav članic, da bi izboljšali poznavanje ter razširjanje kulture in zgodovine evropskih narodov.
The Commission Communication of 10 May 2007 on a European agenda for culture in a globalizing world, endorsed by the Council in its resolution of 16 November 2007 [3] and by the European Parliament in its resolution of 10 April 2008 [4], sets the objectives for future activities of the Union in the field of culture.
Sporočilo Komisije z dne 10. maja 2007 o evropski agendi za kulturo v svetu globalizacije, ki jo je Svet podprl v svoji resoluciji z dne 16. novembra 2007 [3], Evropski parlament pa v svoji resoluciji z dne 10. aprila 2008 [4], določa cilje za prihodnje dejavnosti Unije na področju kulture.
Those activities should promote cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue, culture as a catalyst for creativity within the framework for growth and jobs and culture as a vital element in the Union's international relations.
Te aktivnosti bi morale spodbujati kulturno raznolikost in medkulturni dialog ter kulturo, ki spodbuja ustvarjalnost v okviru strategije za rast in delovna mesta, pa tudi bistveno vlogo kulture v mednarodnih odnosih Unije.
The Unesco Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, which entered into force on 18 March 2007 and to which the Union is a party, aims at protecting and promoting cultural diversity, fostering interculturality and raising awareness of the value of cultural diversity at local, national and international levels.
Konvencija Unesca o varovanju in spodbujanju raznolikosti kulturnih izrazov, ki je stopila v veljavo dne 18. marca 2007 in katere podpisnica je tudi Unija, je namenjena zaščiti in spodbujanju kulturne raznolikosti, pospeševanju medkulturnosti in osveščanju o vrednosti kulturne raznolikosti na lokalni, nacionalni in mednarodni ravni.
Decision No 1622/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] established an action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2007 to 2019.
Sklep št. 1622/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5] je vzpostavil aktivnost za dogodek Evropske prestolnice kulture za leta 2007 do 2019.
The evaluations of the European Capitals of Culture, as well as the public consultation on the future of that action after 2019, have revealed that it has progressively become one of the most ambitious cultural initiatives in Europe as well as one of the most appreciated by European citizens.
Ocenjevanje Evropskih prestolnic kulture pa tudi javno posvetovanje o prihodnosti te aktivnosti po letu 2019 razkrivajo, da postopoma postajajo ena najambicioznejših kulturnih pobud v Evropi, pa tudi ena tistih, ki jih evropski državljani najbolj cenijo.
A new action should, therefore, be established to cover the years 2020-33.
Zato bi bilo treba vzpostaviti novo aktivnost, ki bo zajemala leta od 2020 do 2033.
In addition to the original objectives of the European Capitals of Culture, which were to highlight the richness and diversity of European cultures and the features those cultures share as well as to promote greater mutual understanding between European citizens, cities holding the title of European Capital of Culture (‘the title’) have also progressively added a new dimension by using the leverage effect of the title to stimulate their more general development in accordance with their respective strategies and priorities.
Prvotna cilja Evropskih prestolnic kulture sta bila poudariti bogastvo in raznolikost evropskih kultur in značilnosti, ki si jih te kulture delijo, kakor tudi spodbujati večje medsebojno razumevanje med evropskimi državljani; poleg tega so mesta, ki so nosila naziv Evropska prestolnica kulture (v nadaljnjem besedilu: naziv), postopoma dodajala tudi novo razsežnost z uporabo učinka vzvoda naziva za spodbujanje širšega razvoja mesta v skladu z njegovimi ustreznimi strategijami in prednostnimi nalogami.
The objectives of the action established by this Decision should be fully in line with the objectives of the Creative Europe Programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1295/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], which aims to safeguard, develop and promote European cultural and linguistic diversity, to promote Europe's cultural heritage and to strengthen the competitiveness of the European cultural and creative sectors, in particular that of the audiovisual sector, with a view to supporting smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
Cilji aktivnosti, vzpostavljeni s tem sklepom, bi morali biti povsem v skladu s cilji programa Ustvarjalna Evropa, uvedenega z Uredbo (EU) št. 1295/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], ki ohranja, razvija in spodbuja evropsko kulturno in jezikovno raznolikost, spodbuja evropsko kulturno dediščino ter krepi konkurenčnost evropskih kulturnih in ustvarjalnih sektorjev, zlasti konkurenčnost avdiovizualnega sektorja, s ciljem podpiranja pametne, trajnostne in vključujoče rasti.
The achievement of those objectives should also help to strengthen the feeling of belonging to a common cultural area and to stimulate intercultural dialogue and mutual understanding.
Uresničevanje navedenih ciljev bi prav tako moralo pomagati krepiti občutek pripadnosti skupnemu kulturnemu prostoru ter spodbujati medkulturni dialog in medsebojno razumevanje.
To achieve such objectives, it is important for the cities holding the title to seek to develop links between, on the one hand, their cultural and creative sectors, and, on the other hand, sectors such as education, research, environment, urban development or cultural tourism.
Za dosego teh ciljev je pomembno, da si mesta, ki nosijo naziv, prizadevajo razviti vezi med svojimi kulturnimi in ustvarjalnimi sektorji na eni strani ter sektorji, kot so izobraževanje, raziskave, okolje, razvoj mest ali kulturni turizem, na drugi strani.
In particular, past evidence has shown the potential of the European Capitals of Culture as a catalyst for local development and cultural tourism as highlighted in the Commission Communication of 30 June 2010 entitled ‘Europe, the world's No 1 tourist destination — a new political framework for tourism in Europe’, welcomed by the Council in its conclusions of 12 October 2010 and endorsed by the European Parliament in its resolution of 27 September 2011 [7].
Izkušnje iz preteklosti zlasti kažejo na potencial Evropskih prestolnic kulture kot pospeševalcev lokalnega razvoja in kulturnega turizma, kot je poudarjeno v sporočilu Komisije z dne 30. junija 2010 z naslovom „Evropa, prva svetovna turistična destinacija – nov okvir evropske turistične politike“, ki sta ga podprla Svet v svojih sklepih z dne 12. oktobra 2010 in Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 27. septembra 2011 [7].
It is also important for cities holding the title to seek to promote social inclusion and equal opportunities and to do their utmost to ensure the broadest possible involvement of all the components of civil society in the preparation and implementation of the cultural programme, with special attention being paid to young people and marginalised and disadvantaged groups.
Za mesta, ki nosijo naziv, je tudi pomembno, da si prizadevajo spodbuditi socialno vključevanje in enake možnosti ter da naredijo vse, kar je v njihovih moči, za čim večjo vključitev vseh delov civilne družbe pri pripravi in izvajanju kulturnega programa, posebno pozornost pa namenijo mladim ter marginaliziranim in prikrajšanim skupinam.
The evaluations and the public consultation have also convincingly shown that the European Capitals of Culture have many potential benefits when they are carefully planned.
Ocenjevanja in javno posvetovanje so tudi prepričljivo pokazala, da imajo Evropske prestolnice kulture številne potencialne koristi, če so skrbno načrtovane.
They remain first and foremost a cultural initiative, but can also bring significant social and economic benefits, particularly when they are embedded in a long-term culture-led development strategy for the city concerned.
Ostajajo predvsem kulturna pobuda, lahko pa prinesejo tudi znatne družbene in gospodarske koristi, še zlasti kadar so vpete v dolgoročno kulturno usmerjeno razvojno strategijo za zadevno mesto.
The European Capitals of Culture action has also been highly challenging.
Aktivnost Evropskih prestolnic kulture je tudi velik izziv.
Staging a year-long programme of cultural activities is demanding and some cities holding the title have been more successful than others in capitalising on the potential.
Izvajanje celoletnega programa kulturnih dejavnosti je zahtevno in nekatera mesta, ki so nosila naziv, so bila pri izkoriščanju potenciala uspešnejša kakor druga.
Therefore, that action should be reinforced in order to help all cities to make the most of the title.
Zato bi bilo treba to aktivnost okrepiti, da bi vsem mestom pomagali kar najbolje izkoristiti naziv.
The title should continue to be reserved to cities, irrespective of their size, but in order to reach a wider public and amplify the impact, it should also be possible, as before, for the cities concerned to involve their surrounding area.
Naziv bi moral biti še naprej ohranjen za mesta, ne glede na njihovo velikost, da pa bi ta mesta dosegla širše občinstvo in povečala učinek, bi morala imeti zadevna mesta še naprej možnost, da vključijo svoja okoliška območja.
The award of the title should continue to be based on a specifically created cultural programme, which should have a strong European dimension.
Podelitev naziva bi morala še naprej temeljiti na posebej pripravljenem kulturnem programu, ki bi moral imeti močno evropsko razsežnost.
That cultural programme should be part of a long-term strategy having a sustainable impact on local economic, cultural and social development.
Ta kulturni program bi moral biti del dolgoročne strategije s trajnostnim vplivom na lokalni gospodarski, kulturni in družbeni razvoj.
The two-stage selection process based on a chronological list of Member States and carried out by a panel of independent experts has proven to be fair and transparent.
Dvostopenjski izbirni postopek, ki temelji na kronološkem seznamu držav članic in ga izvaja svet neodvisnih strokovnjakov, se je izkazal kot pošten in pregleden.
It has enabled cities to improve their applications between the pre-selection and the selection phase on the basis of expert advice received from that panel, and has ensured an equitable distribution of the title across all Member States.
Mestom je omogočil, da izboljšajo svoje prijave v času od predizbora do izbirne faze na podlagi strokovnih nasvetov navedenega sveta, in zagotovil pravično razporeditev naziva v vseh državah članicah.
Furthermore, to safeguard the continuity of the European Capitals of Culture action and avoid the loss of experience and know-how which would result from all experts being replaced simultaneously, the replacement of experts should be staggered.
Da se ohrani kontinuiteta aktivnosti Evropske prestolnice kulture in se ne izgubijo izkušnje in strokovno znanje – kar bi bila posledica sočasne zamenjave vseh strokovnjakov sveta – bi bilo treba zamenjavo strokovnjakov opraviti postopoma.
National expertise should continue to be ensured by enabling Member States to appoint up to two experts to a panel carrying out the selection and monitoring procedures.
Nacionalno strokovno znanje bi bilo treba nadalje zagotavljati s tem, da imajo države članice možnost imenovati do dva strokovnjaka v svet, ki izvaja postopke izbora in spremljanja.
The selection criteria should be made more explicit in order to provide candidate cities with better guidance regarding the objectives and requirements with which they need to comply in order to be awarded the title.
Izbirna merila bi morala biti bolj natančna, da se zagotovi mestom, ki kandidirajo, boljše napotke v zvezi s cilji in zahtevami, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati, da bi jim bil podeljen naziv.
Those criteria should also be easier to measure in order to help the panel in the selection and monitoring of cities.
Ta merila bi morala biti tudi lažje merljiva, da bi bila v pomoč svetu pri izboru in spremljanju mest.
In this regard, there should be a particular focus on candidate cities' plans for legacy activities embedded in a long-term cultural policy strategy capable of generating a sustainable cultural, economic and social impact.
V zvezi s tem bi se bilo treba zlasti osredotočiti na načrte mest, ki kandidirajo za dejavnosti, ki prinašajo trajne koristi in so vključene v dolgoročno strategijo kulturne politike, ki lahko spodbudijo trajnostni kulturni, gospodarski in družbeni vpliv.
Candidate cities should explore the possibility, where appropriate, of seeking financial support from Union programmes and funds.
Mesta, ki kandidirajo, bi morala, kjer je ustrezno, raziskati tudi možnosti za finančno podporo iz programov in skladov Unije.
The preparation phase between the designation of a city and the year of the title is of crucial importance for the success of the European Capitals of Culture action.
Pripravljalna faza v času od imenovanja mesta do leta naziva je bistvenega pomena za uspeh aktivnosti Evropske prestolnice kulture.
There is broad consensus among stakeholders that the accompanying measures introduced by Decision No 1622/2006/EC have been very useful for the cities concerned.
Med zainteresiranimi stranmi obstaja široko soglasje, da so bili spremljajoči ukrepi, uvedeni s Sklepom št. 1622/2006/ES, izredno koristni za zadevna mesta.
Those measures should be further developed, in particular through more frequent monitoring meetings and visits to the cities by panel experts, and through an even stronger exchange of experience between past, present and future cities holding the title, as well as candidate cities.
Te ukrepe bi bilo treba nadalje razviti, zlasti s pogostejšimi sestanki za spremljanje in obiski mest s strani strokovnjakov sveta ter še večjo izmenjavo izkušenj med nekdanjimi, sedanjimi in prihodnjimi mesti, ki nosijo naziv, pa tudi mesti, ki kandidirajo zanj.
Designated cities could also develop further links with other cities holding the title.
Imenovana mesta bi se lahko tudi tesneje povezala z drugimi mesti, ki nosijo naziv.
The Melina Mercouri prize established by Decision No 1622/2006/EC has acquired a strong symbolic value which goes far beyond the actual amount awarded by the Commission.
Nagrada Melina Mercouri, uvedena s Sklepom št. 1622/2006/ES, je pridobila veliko simbolično vrednost, ki daleč presega dejanski znesek nagrade, ki ga podeli Komisija.
However, in order to ensure that the designated cities fulfil their commitments, the conditions for payment of the prize money should be made more stringent and explicit.
Da pa bi zagotovili, da bodo imenovana mesta izpolnila svoje zaveze, bi morali biti pogoji za izplačilo zneska nagrade strožji in natančnejši.
It is important that the cities concerned make clear in all their communication material that the action established by this Decision is a Union action.
Pomembno je, da zadevna mesta v vsem svojem komunikacijskem gradivu jasno navedejo, da je aktivnost, vzpostavljena s tem sklepom, aktivnost Unije.
The Commission's evaluations of the past European Capitals of Culture, which are based on data collected at a local level, have not been able to provide primary data on the impact of the title.
Komisija s svojimi ocenami nekdanjih Evropskih prestolnic kulture, ki temeljijo na podatkih, zbranih na lokalni ravni, ne more zagotoviti primarnih podatkov o učinku naziva.
Therefore, the cities themselves should be the key players in the evaluation process.
Zato bi morali biti ključni akterji v procesu ocenjevanja mesta sama.
Past experience has shown that the participation of candidate countries can help to bring them closer to the Union by highlighting the common aspects of European cultures.
Pretekle izkušnje so pokazale, da lahko sodelovanje držav kandidatk s poudarjanjem skupnih vidikov evropskih kultur pripomore k temu, da jih približa Uniji.
The action established by this Decision should therefore be open to the participation of candidate countries and potential candidates after 2019.
Zato bi bilo treba aktivnost, vzpostavljeno s tem sklepom, po letu 2019 odpreti za sodelovanje držav kandidatk in potencialnih kandidatk.
However, during the period covered by this Decision, namely from 2020 to 2033, for reasons of equity with cities in the Member States, cities in candidate countries and potential candidates should only be allowed to participate in one competition for the title.
Vendar bi moralo biti v obdobju, zajetim s tem sklepom, in sicer med letoma 2020 in 2033, zaradi enakosti z mesti držav članic mestom v državah kandidatkah in potencialnih kandidatkah dovoljeno sodelovati le na enem natečaju za naziv.
Furthermore, likewise for reasons of equity with Member States, each candidate country or potential candidate should only be allowed to host the title once during that period.
Poleg tega bi moralo biti – prav tako zaradi enakosti z državami članicami – vsaki državi kandidatki ali potencialni kandidatki dovoljeno, da gosti naziv le enkrat v navedenem obdobju.
Decision No 1622/2006/EC should be repealed.
Sklep št. 1622/2006/ES bi bilo treba razveljaviti.
However, its provisions should continue to apply in relation to all cities which have already been, or are in the process of being, designated for the years up to 2019.
Vendar bi se njegove določbe morale še naprej uporabljati za vsa mesta, ki so že bila imenovana ali so v postopku imenovanja za leta do 2019.