natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, CCCME contested that the data collected by the consultant can be considered as positive evidence within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation since the data was to a large extent based on assumptions and estimations.
Poleg tega je CCCME nasprotoval trditvi, da se lahko podatki, ki jih je zbral svetovalec, štejejo za trdne dokaze v smislu člena 3(2) osnovne uredbe, ker so podatki v veliki meri temeljili na predpostavkah in ocenah.
Furthermore, it was claimed that the data supplied were not sufficiently supported by evidence in the file and that they were not of an affirmative, objective and verifiable character.
Poleg tega se je trdilo, da zagotovljeni podatki niso bili zadostno podprti z dokazi iz spisa ter da niso imeli pritrdilnega, objektivnega in preverljivega značaja.
In respect of these claims, reference is made to the recitals (136) to (137) above where additional information was provided regarding the selection of the consultant.
V zvezi s temi trditvami je treba omeniti uvodni izjavi (136) in (137), v katerih so navedene dodatne informacije o izbiri svetovalca.
In addition, it is noted that the Commission hired the consultant on the basis of the best available information at that moment in time and in full compliance with the Commission Financial Regulation applicable to the procedure.
Poleg tega je treba omeniti, da je Komisija najela svetovalca na podlagi najboljših informacij, ki so bile na voljo v tistem trenutku, in v popolni skladnosti s finančno uredbo Komisije, ki velja za postopek.
Furthermore, it is recalled that the consultant's capacity to provide all the needed data in due time was of great importance since the Commission was bound to statutory deadlines for the publication of the provisional findings in the on-going investigation.
Treba je tudi dodati, da je bila zmožnost svetovalca, da pravočasno zagotovi vse potrebne podatke, zelo pomembna, ker je Komisija bila zavezana k spoštovanju zakonsko predpisanih rokov za objavo začasnih ugotovitev v potekajoči preiskavi.
As regards the quality of the data supplied and whether it can be considered as positive evidence in accordance with Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation, as mentioned above in recital (137), the consultant's methodology for collecting the data was examined and it was assessed that it was of satisfactory quality.
Kar zadeva kakovost zagotovljenih podatkov in vprašanja, ali se lahko štejejo za trdne dokaze v skladu s členom 3(2) osnovne uredbe, kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (137), je bila kakovost svetovalčeve metodologije za zbiranje podatkov proučena in ocenjena kot zadovoljiva.
In addition, as also mentioned above in the same recital, the data supplied by the consultant were cross-checked when possible with other sources and found to be reasonably accurate.
Poleg tega, kot je tudi omenjeno v isti uvodni izjavi, so bili podatki, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec, navzkrižno preverjeni z drugimi viri, če je bilo to mogoče, in ugotovljeno je bilo, da so sprejemljivo točni.
Finally, it is noted that the consultant has one database which is up-dated on a regular basis, independently of the clients' needs and requests.
Nazadnje je treba poudariti, da ima svetovalec eno zbirko podatkov, ki se redno posodablja, neodvisno od potreb in zahtev stranke.
The same database is used to aggregate and deliver PV statistics to various clients, and therefore the allegation that data were not objective had to be rejected.
Ista zbirka podatkov se uporablja za združevanje in dostavo statističnih podatkov s področja fotonapetostne industrije različnim strankam, zato je bilo treba zavrniti trditev, da podatki niso objektivni.
After final disclosure, one interested party claimed that the Commission had not disclosed the sources, the methodology used and the companies with which the consultant co-operated to compile the macroeconomic data supplied.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran trdila, da Komisija ni razkrila virov, uporabljene metodologije in družb, s katerimi je svetovalec sodeloval pri zbiranju zagotovljenih makroekonomskih podatkov.
Another interested party reiterated that the methodology applied by the consultant suggests inaccurate results.
Druga zainteresirana stran je ponovila, da metodologija, ki jo je uporabil svetovalec, daje netočne rezultate.
Several interested parties requested further information concerning the methodology used by the consultant such as the average response rates to the questionnaires/interviews, the percentage of data collected through each channel, how these were verified, the approximations/assumptions used to generate the data, the number of companies for which approximations were made, and at least a range of the number of employees of the consultant.
Več zainteresiranih strani je zahtevalo dodatne informacije o metodologiji, ki jo je uporabil svetovalec, na primer informacije o povprečnih časih odziva na vprašalnike/ankete, o odstotkih podatkov, zbranih po posameznih kanalih, o preverjanju, o ocenah/predpostavkah, uporabljenih za pripravo podatkov, o številu družb, za katere so bili narejene ocene in vsaj o razponu števila zaposlenih pri svetovalcu.
In respect of these claims, it is noted that subsequently to the imposition of the provisional measures, the Commission provided interested parties with the methodology and with the sources used by the consultant in aggregating the data and addressed specific questions of the interested parties in this regard following the provisional disclosure.
V zvezi s temi trditvami je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov zainteresirane strani seznanila z metodologijo in viri, ki jih je svetovalec uporabil pri združevanju podatkov, ter obravnavala posebna vprašanja zainteresiranih strani v zvezi s tem, ki so se pojavila po začasnem razkritju.
The additional requests for information of the interested parties concerned following final disclosure are considered to be covered by the information made available after the imposition of provisional duties to the extent that the confidentiality limitations allowed it.
Šteje se, da so dodatne zahteve za informacije, ki so jih po dokončnem razkritju predložile zadevne zainteresirane strani, izpolnjene z informacijami, ki so bile v obsegu, ki ga dopuščajo omejitve zaradi zaupnosti, dane na voljo po uvedbi začasnih dajatev.
In addition, it is underlined that the Commission verified on-the-spot the way the data had been collected and aggregated by the consultant and the relevant underlying assumptions for aggregating the data.
Poleg tega je treba poudariti, da je Komisija na kraju samem preverila, kako svetovalec zbira in združuje podatke, in ustrezne temeljne postavke za združevanje podatkov.
The results of the verification were satisfactory and the Commission was reassured of the reasonableness of the underlying assumptions and of the quality of the data supplied by the consultant.
Rezultati preverjanja so bili zadovoljivi, Komisija pa je dobila zagotovila o razumnosti temeljnih predpostavk in o kakovosti podatkov, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec.
Furthermore, the parties did not contest the data as such.
Poleg tega strani niso izpodbijale podatkov samih po sebi.
After final disclosure, another party requested clarifications with regard to the number of Union producers considered by the consultant in its data collection and the overlap between these and the around 215 Union producers known to the Commission.
Po dokončnem razkritju je druga stran zahtevala pojasnila glede števila proizvajalcev Unije, ki jih je svetovalec upošteval v svoji zbirki podatkov, ter glede prekrivanja med temi in približno 215 proizvajalci Unije, ki so znani Komisiji.
In this respect, it is clarified that the Union producers considered by the consultant are largely the same than the ones known to represent the Union industry in this investigation mentioned in recital (133) above.
V zvezi s tem je treba pojasniti, da so proizvajalci Unije, ki jih je upošteval svetovalec, večinoma isti kot tisti, ki predstavljajo industrijo Unije v tej preiskavi, kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (133).
After final disclosure, one party claimed that the Commission has conducted the injury analysis in an inconsistent manner since it was done separately for modules and cells while the injury and dumping margin calculations had been established as a weighted average for modules and cells together.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena stran trdila, da je Komisija izvedla analizo škode na neskladen način, ker je bila opravljena ločeno za module in celice, medtem ko so bili izračuni škode in stopnje dampinga izvedeni kot tehtano povprečje za module in celice skupaj.
In this respect, it is noted that while indicators were shown separately for each product type, the conclusions reached for each indicator refer to the product under investigation as a whole.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so kazalniki res bili prikazani ločeno za posamezno vrsto izdelka, sklepi glede posameznega kazalnika pa se nanašajo na izdelek v preiskavi kot celoto.
It is also recalled that modules and cells are one single product and therefore the dumping margins and the injury elimination level were established on this basis.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da so moduli in celice en sam izdelek, zato so bile stopnje dampinga in stopnja odprave škode določene na tej podlagi.
Therefore, the claim was rejected.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
Finally, another party claimed that the calculation of the values of macroeconomic indicators during the IP was wrongly based on a simple average of the years 2011 and 2012 as such methodology would not be objective and would not lead to results reflecting the reality during the IP.
Nazadnje je druga stran trdila, da je izračun vrednosti makroekonomskih kazalnikov v OP napačno temeljil na preprostem povprečju let 2011 in 2012, ker takšna metodologija ni objektivna in ne daje rezultatov, ki izražajo resnično stanje v OP.
It is clarified that a simple average of the data was only used in case where there were similar trends in the periods concerned.
Pojasnjeno je, da je preprosto povprečje podatkov bilo uporabljeno samo, ko so v zadevnih obdobjih obstajali podobni trendi.
In case trends were different, the methodology was adapted accordingly by taking into consideration market reality.
Če so bili trendi različni, je bila metodologija ustrezno prilagojena glede na tržno stvarnost.
The party concerned did not develop to what extend the results of the methodology used would not reflect market reality.
Zadevna stran ni podrobneje pojasnila, v kolikšni meri rezultati uporabljene metodologije ne izražajo tržne stvarnosti.
On the basis of the above, and in absence of any other comments in this respect, the findings in recitals (98) to (101) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Na podlagi navedenega in ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi s tem, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (98) do (101) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Several parties argued that the injury should have been assessed separately for the captive market and for the free market.
Več strani je trdilo, da bi bilo treba škodo oceniti ločeno za zaprti trg in prosti trg.
One party argued that data relating to cells destined for captive use should have been excluded from the injury assessment on the grounds that they were not affected by the dumped imports.
Ena stran je trdila, da bi bilo treba podatke, ki se nanašajo na celice, namenjene lastni uporabi, izključiti iz ocene škode, ker dampinški uvoz nanje ne vpliva.
As mentioned in recital (105) to the provisional Regulation consumption, sales volume, production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, growth, investments, stocks, employment, productivity, cash flow, return on investment, ability to raise capital and magnitude of the dumping margin should be examined referring to the total activity of the Union industry, i.e. including captive use, as the production destined for the captive market was equally affected by the competition of imports from the country concerned.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (105) začasne uredbe, je treba potrošnjo, obseg prodaje, proizvodnjo, proizvodno zmogljivost, izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, rast, naložbe, zaloge, zaposlenost, produktivnost, denarni tok, donosnost naložb, zmožnost zbiranja kapitala in višino stopnje dampinga proučiti glede na celotno dejavnost industrije Unije, tj. vključno z lastno uporabo, saj ima konkurenca uvoza iz zadevne države enak vpliv tudi na proizvodnjo izdelkov za zaprti trg.
Thus, the investigation has shown that vertically integrated Union producers were forced to import dumped products (cells) and to cease production of these products at cost above the import price, as a consequence of the price pressure exerted by the dumped imports.
Preiskava je torej pokazala, da so bili vertikalno integrirani proizvajalci Unije prisiljeni uvažati dampinške izdelke (celice) in ustaviti proizvodnjo teh izdelkov, katere stroški so bili višji od uvozne cene, zaradi pritiska na cene, ki se je izvajal z dampinškim uvozom.
Furthermore, the investigation also revealed that the free market and the captive market displayed similar trends in prices, which also showed that they were equally affected by the imports concerned.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da je trend cen na prostem in zaprtem trgu podoben, kar kaže tudi, da zadevni uvoz enako vpliva na cene na obeh trgih.
After final disclosure, several parties reiterated that the Commission failed to provide an adequate and reasoned analysis of the captive market or why a separate analysis had not been carried out.
Po dokončnem razkritju je več strani ponovilo, da Komisija ni uspela zagotoviti ustrezne in utemeljene analize zaprtega trga, oziroma zakaj ni bila opravljena ločena analiza.
One party claimed that no information was provided about the significance of the Union production destined for captive use.
Ena stran je trdila, da ni bilo zagotovljenih nobenih informacij o pomembnosti proizvodnje Unije, namenjene za lastno uporabo.
In addition, it was claimed that recital (106) to the provisional Regulation concluding that prices in the captive market did not always reflect market prices, contradicted the conclusions set out in recital (155) above that the free market and captive market displayed similar trends in prices.
Poleg tega je trdila, da je uvodna izjava (106) začasne uredbe, ki navaja, da cene na zaprtem trgu ne izražajo vedno tržnih cen, v nasprotju s sklepi iz uvodne izjave (155), da je trend cen na prostem trgu podoben tistemu na zaprtem trgu.
It is firstly noted that recital (105) to the provisional Regulation sets out the reasons as to why it was considered appropriate to examine injury indicators (except for profitability) referring to the total activity of the Union industry including captive use.
Najprej je treba omeniti, da so v uvodni izjavi (105) začasne uredbe določeni razlogi, zakaj se je štelo primerno, da se proučijo kazalniki škode (razen dobičkonosnosti) glede na celotno dejavnost industrije Unije, vključno z lastno uporabo.
In this regard it is recalled, as set out in the same recital, that the investigation revealed that the production destined for captive use was equally affected by the competition of the imports from the PRC, which as such was not contested by the interested parties concerned.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, kot je določeno v isti uvodni izjavi, da je preiskava razkrila, da je na proizvodnjo, namenjeno lastni uporabi, enako vplivala konkurenca uvoza iz LRK, ki je kot takšne zainteresirane zadevne strani niso izpodbijale.
Therefore, the claim that no explanations were given as to why no separate analysis took place had to be rejected.
Trditev, da niso bile navedene obrazložitve, zakaj ni bila opravljena ločena analiza, je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Likewise, as it follows from this conclusion, it had also to be rejected that such separate analysis of the captive market should have taken place.
Prav tako, ker izhaja iz tega sklepa, je bilo treba zavrniti tudi trditev, da bi bilo treba opraviti takšno ločeno analizo zaprtega trga.
Secondly, while on the basis of the above the significance of the Union production destined for captive use was not considered an essential element, it is noted that the Union production of cells destined for captive use represented about half of the total production in the IP.
Nadalje, čeprav se na podlagi navedenega pomembnost proizvodnje Unije, namenjene za lastno uporabo, ni štela za bistveni element, je treba omeniti, da je proizvodnja celic v Uniji, namenjena za lastno uporabo, pomenila približno polovico skupne proizvodnje v OP.
Finally, it is clarified that the fact that prices in the captive market do not reflect the prices in the free market is not necessarily contradicting the fact that both prices followed the same trends, as they may still be at different levels or price movements may be at a higher or lower degree and thus depicting a different picture.
Nazadnje je treba pojasniti, da dejstvo, da cene na zaprtem trgu ne izražajo cen na prostem trgu, ni nujno v nasprotju z dejstvom, da je trend cen enak na obeh trgih, saj sta lahko še vedno na različnih stopnjah ali pa so gibanja cen na višji ali nižji stopnji, zato je prikazano drugačno stanje.
On the basis of the above, the claims concerning the captive market were rejected.
Na podlagi navedenega so bile trditve v zvezi z zaprtim trgom zavrnjene.
The parties concerned did not provide any information which could have devaluated the findings concerning the determination of the Union market.
Zadevne strani niso predložile nobenih informacij, ki bi lahko zmanjšale pomen ugotovitev glede določitve trga Unije.
On these grounds, the claims in this respect were rejected and the findings as set out in recitals (102) to (106) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Na podlagi tega so trditve v zvezi s tem zavrnjene, ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (102) do (106) začasne uredbe pa se potrdijo.
One interested party argued that data concerning the Union consumption of the product under investigation vary significantly, depending on the source used.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da se podatki o potrošnji izdelka v preiskavi v Uniji znatno razlikujejo, odvisno od uporabljenega vira.
This party argued that reliable data can only be established on the basis of the information gathered from specialised institutions or research centres.
Ta stran je trdila, da se lahko zanesljivi podatki pridobijo samo na podlagi informacij specializiranih institucij ali raziskovalnih centrov.
In view of the explanations and conclusions reached in the recitals (134) to (152) above, concerning the reliability of the data provided by the consultant used in the investigation, this argument was rejected.
Ob upoštevanju pojasnil in ugotovitev iz uvodnih izjav od (134) do (152) v zvezi z zanesljivostjo podatkov, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec in so se uporabili v preiskavi, je bil ta argument zavrnjen.
The same party argued that Union consumption should not be established by merely adding up available module production capacities in the Union and that the module consumption of the Union industry's own projects should be deducted therefrom.
Ista stran je trdila, da se potrošnja Unije ne bi smela določiti zgolj s seštevanjem razpoložljivih zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo modulov v Uniji in da bi bilo treba potrošnjo modulov za lastne projekte industrije Unije odšteti od navedenega seštevka.
This argument was rejected, as consumption of modules was established on the basis of newly installed capacities in the Union.
Ta argument je bil zavrnjen, saj je bila potrošnja modulov določena na podlagi na novo nameščenih zmogljivosti v Uniji.
This is a common practice for determining the module consumption.
To je običajna praksa za določitev potrošnje modulov.
For cells the consumption was determined on the basis of the Union production of modules.
Za celice je bila potrošnja določena na podlagi celotne proizvodnje modulov v Uniji.
Another party argued that that the methodology described by the consultant admits the difficulty to establish reliable consumption figures.
Druga stran je trdila, da metodologija, ki jo je opisal svetovalec, dopušča težave pri določanju zanesljivih številk o porabi.
It was further argued that import data as well as export sales from the Union industry were either based on unverifiable estimations or incomplete data and that the cross checking of the Commission was not sufficient to allow the conclusion that those data were indeed reliable and accurate.
Nadalje je trdila, da so podatki o uvozu in izvozu iz industrije Unije temeljili na nepreverljivih ocenah ali nepopolnih podatkih in da navzkrižno preverjanje, ki ga je opravila Komisija, ni bilo zadostno, da bi bilo mogoče skleniti, da so ti podatki dejansko zanesljivi in točni.
As already mentioned above in recitals (136) and (137) above the quality of the data and the methodologies used to collect them were verified by the Commission during an on-spot visit on the basis of which it was considered that the methodologies used were appropriate and the results accurate and reasonably reliable.
Kot je že omenjeno v uvodnih izjavah (136) in (137), je Komisija kakovost podatkov in metodologije, uporabljene za zbiranje, preverila med obiskom na kraju samem in na podlagi tega ugotovila, da so bile uporabljene ustrezne metode in da so rezultati točni in dokaj zanesljivi.
On this basis, and in the absence of any other comments with respect to the Union consumption, recitals (107) to (109) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Na podlagi tega in ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi s potrošnjo Unije, se uvodne izjave od (107) do (109) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Volume and market share of the imports from the country concerned
Obseg in tržni delež uvoza iz zadevne države
One interested party argued that data concerning import volumes of the product under investigation vary significantly, depending the source used.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da se podatki o obsegu uvoza izdelka v preiskavi znatno razlikujejo, odvisno od uporabljenega vira.
After final disclosure, one interested party contested the methodology to determine the total import value from the PRC claiming that it had been based on transactions made at CIF level duty unpaid and it is therefore doubtful whether these transactions had been destined for Union consumption.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran nasprotovala metodologiji za določitev celotne uvozne vrednosti iz LRK, ker naj bi temeljila na transakcijah na ravni CIF brez plačane dajatve, zato je vprašljivo, ali so te transakcije bile namenjene za potrošnjo v Uniji.
In respect of this claim, it is clarified that the total import value from PRC as provided by the consultant had not been used in the provisional and definitive findings and that only import volumes and import prices were determined during the investigation as shown in recitals (110) to (113) to the provisional Regulation.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je treba pojasniti, da celotna uvozna vrednost iz LRK, kot jo je zagotovil svetovalec, ni bila uporabljena v začasnih in dokončnih ugotovitvah, in da so bili med preiskavo določeni samo obseg uvoza in uvozne cene, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od (110) do (113) začasne uredbe.
As the methodology to determine import prices was not contested as such by the interested party concerned reference is made to the relevant findings in recital (113) to (117) to the provisional Regulation and recitals (168) to (176) below.
Ker zadevna zainteresirana stran ni izpodbijala metodologije za določitev uvoznih cen same po sebi, je treba omeniti ustrezne ugotovitve v uvodnih izjavah od (113) do (117) začasne uredbe in uvodnih izjavah od (168) do (176).
Therefore, the above claim was rejected.
Zgornja trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
On this basis, and in the absence of any other comments with respect to imports of the product concerned from the PRC, recitals (110) to (112) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Na podlagi navedenega in ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z uvozom zadevnega izdelka iz LRK, se uvodne izjave od (110) do (112) začasne uredbe potrdijo.