natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Questionnaires were sent to the producers/exporters in the PRC, India and Indonesia known to the Commission or which made themselves known within the deadlines specified in recital 15 of the initiating Regulation.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani proizvajalcem/izvoznikom v LRK, Indiji in Indoneziji, ki so bili Komisiji znani ali ki so se sami javili v rokih iz uvodne izjave (15) uredbe o začetku preiskave.
Two exporting producers in India and one unrelated importer in the Union made themselves known and submitted replies to the questionnaires.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika v Indiji in en nepovezan uvoznik v Uniji so se javili in predložili izpolnjene vprašalnike.
Later the Union importer informed the Commission that it imported other products and it did not import any product under investigation in the past.
Uvoznik Unije je kasneje Komisijo obvestil, da je v preteklosti uvažal druge izdelke in ne izdelek v preiskavi.
No exporting producer in Indonesia submitted a reply.
Odgovora ni poslal noben proizvajalec izvoznik iz Indonezije.
The following exporting producers in India submitted an exemption form reply:
Kot odgovor sta obrazec za izvzetje poslala naslednja proizvajalca izvoznika iz Indije:
(‘Montex’), and
(„Montex“) in
Subsequently, Urja Products Pvt.Ltd. informed the Commission that it does not produce the product under investigation and its products have different technical characteristics and different use (falling within other CN codes).
Družba Urja Products Pvt.Ltd. je po tem obvestila Komisijo, da ne proizvaja izdelka v preiskavi in da imajo njeni izdelki različne tehnične značilnosti in drugačne uporabe (uvrščeni so pod druge oznake KN).
Therefore, a verification visit was carried out only at the premises of Montex.
Posledično je preveritveni obisk potekal le v prostorih Montex.
The investigation period covered the period from 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2013 (‘the IP’).
Obdobje preiskave je trajalo od 1. aprila 2009 do 31. marca 2013 („OP“).
More detailed data were collected for the reporting period from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2013 (‘the RP’) in order to examine the possible undermining of the remedial effect of the measures in force and existence of dumping.
Za obdobje od 1. aprila 2012 do 31. marca 2013 („obdobje poročanja“) so se zbrali podrobnejši podatki, da bi se preverila morebitna oslabitev popravljalnega učinka veljavnih ukrepov in obstoj dampinga.
In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the assessment of the existence of circumvention was made by analysing successively whether there was a change in the pattern of trade between the PRC, India, Indonesia and the Union; if that change stemmed from a practice, process or work for which there was insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty; if there was evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty were being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the product under investigation; and whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for the product concerned, if necessary in accordance with the provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe se je obstoj izogibanja ukrepom ocenjeval z zaporedno analizo, v kateri se je ugotavljalo, ali je prišlo do spremembe v trgovinskem vzorcu med LRK, Indijo, Indonezijo in Unijo; ali je ta sprememba nastala zaradi prakse, postopka ali dejavnosti, za katero razen uvedbe dajatve ni zadostnega vzroka ali ni gospodarsko upravičena; ali so obstajali dokazi o škodi ali o tem, da je bil popravljalni učinek dajatve oslabljen v smislu cene in/ali količine izdelka v preiskavi; in ali so obstajali dokazi o dampingu v zvezi z normalnimi vrednostmi, predhodno določenimi za zadevni izdelek, po potrebi v skladu z določbami člena 2 osnovne uredbe.
The product concerned is as defined in the original investigation: Open mesh fabrics of glass fibres, of a cell size of more than 1,8 mm both in length and in width and weighing more than 35 g/m2, excluding fibreglass discs, originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN codes ex70195100 and ex70195900.
Zadevni izdelek je opredeljen v prvotni preiskavi: tkanine z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken z velikostjo celice več kot 1,8 mm po dolžini in širini ter težo več kot 35 g/m2, razen diskov iz steklenih vlaken, s poreklom iz LRK, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznaki KN ex70195100 in ex70195900.
The product under investigation is the same as that defined in the previous recital, but consigned from India and Indonesia, whether declared as originating in India and Indonesia or not.
Izdelek v preiskavi je enak izdelku, kakor je opredeljen v predhodni uvodni izjavi, vendar je poslan iz Indije in Indonezije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Indije in Indonezije ali ne.
The investigation showed that open mesh fabrics of glass fibres, as defined above, exported from the PRC to the Union and those consigned from India and Indonesia to the Union have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and have the same uses, and are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo tkanine z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken, kakor so opredeljene zgoraj, izvožene iz LRK v Unijo, in tiste, ki so poslane v Unijo iz Indije in Indonezije, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter enako uporabo, zato se jih šteje za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
As stated in recital 10 above, only two Indian companies submitted an exemption form reply.
Kot je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi (10), sta le dve indijski družbi predložili obrazec za izvzetje.
As one of them, Urja Products Pvt.Ltd., was found not to be a producer of the product under investigation, there was only one cooperating company, Montex.
Ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da družba Urja Products Pvt.Ltd. ne proizvaja izdelka v preiskavi, je v preiskavi sodelovala samo družba Montex.
The company represented only 1 % of the exports from India to the Union in the RP, compared to overall exports from India.
Družba je v celotnem obsegu izvoza iz Indije predstavljala samo 1 % izvoza iz Indije v Unijo v obdobju poročanja.
This led to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and findings with regard to India were based on facts available.
Zato so bile v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe ugotovitve glede Indije utemeljene z razpoložljivimi dejstvi.
As stated in recital (10), no Indonesian companies submitted a questionnaire reply.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (10), ni izpolnjenih vprašalnikov predložila nobena indonezijska družba.
There was no cooperation from Indonesian companies.
Indonezijske družbe niso sodelovale.
This led to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and findings with regard to Indonesia were based on facts available.
Zato so bile v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe ugotovitve glede Indonezije utemeljene z razpoložljivimi dejstvi.
This led to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and findings with regard to the PRC were based on facts available.
Zato so bile v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe ugotovitve glede LRK utemeljene z razpoložljivimi dejstvi.
To determine whether there was a change in the pattern of trade, imports of the product under investigation from India and Indonesia into the Union and exports of the product under investigation from the PRC to India and Indonesia were assessed.
Da se ugotovi, ali je prišlo do spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja, je bil ocenjen uvoz izdelka v preiskavi iz Indije in Indonezije v Unijo ter izvoz izdelka v preiskavi iz LRK v Indijo in Indonezijo.
Those imports were established on the basis of facts available under Article 18(1) of the basic Regulation given the relatively low or no cooperation of Indian, Indonesian and Chinese companies (see Section 2.3 above).
Glede na razmeroma nizko raven sodelovanja oziroma nesodelovanje indijskih, indonezijskih in kitajskih družb (glej oddelek 2.3), je bil uvoz v skladu s členom 18(1) osnovne uredbe določen na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
The import volume recorded in COMEXT statistics covers a larger product group than the product concerned and the product under investigation.
Obseg uvoza, evidentiran v statističnih podatkih COMEXT, zajema skupino izdelkov, ki je večja od zadevnega izdelka in izdelka v preiskavi.
However, based on estimates provided by the Union industry, it could be established that a significant part of that import volume covered the product concerned and the product under investigation.
Vendar se je na podlagi ocen, ki jih je priskrbela industrija Unije, lahko ugotovilo, da je znatni del obsega tega uvoza zajemal zadevni izdelek in izdelek v preiskavi.
Accordingly, those data could be used to establish a change in the pattern of trade.
Zato je bilo te podatke mogoče uporabiti za ugotovitev spremembe vzorca trgovanja.
COMEXT statistics show a significant change in the pattern of trade over the IP (see Table 1 below).
Statistični podatki COMEXT kažejo znatno spremembo vzorca trgovanja v OP (glej preglednico 1 spodaj).
Source: COMEXT statistics
Vir: statistični podatki COMEXT
Import volumes (millions of m2) [8]
Obseg uvoza (v mio. m2) [8]
April 2009/March 2010
aprila 2009/marca 2010
April 2010/March 2011
aprila 2010/marca 2011
April 2011/March 2012
aprila 2011/marca 2012
April 2012/March 2013
aprila 2012/marca 2013
According to COMEXT statistics, in the financial year 2009/2010 the quantities imported from India to the Union accounted for 0,35 million m2, in the financial year 2010/2011 it was 0,28 million m2 and it increased sharply between 2011/2012 and 2012/2013, reaching 13,13 million m2 in the financial year 2012/2013.
Po statističnih podatkih COMEXT je obseg uvoza iz Indije v Unijo v obračunskem letu 2009/2010 znašal 0,35 milijona m2 in v obračunskem letu 2010/2011 0,28 milijona m2, ta se je močno povečal v obračunskih letih 2011/2012 in 2012/2013, saj je v slednjem dosegel 13,13 milijona m2.
Its exports had therefore to be added to the COMEXT statistics as shown in Table 1 above.
Izvoz te družbe je zato treba prišteti statističnim podatkom COMEXT, kot prikazuje preglednica 1 zgoraj.
According to COMEXT statistics, in the financial year 2009/2010 the quantities imported from Indonesia to the Union market accounted for 0,004 million m2, in 2010/2011 they amounted to 0,16 million m2 and they increased sharply between 2011/2012 and 2012/2013, from 3,22 million m2 to 33,31 million m2 respectively.
Po statističnih podatkih COMEXT je obseg uvoza iz Indonezije v Unijo v obračunskem letu 2009/2010 znašal 0,004 milijona m2 in v obračunskem letu 2010/2011 0,16 milijona m2 ter se je močno povečal med obračunskimi leti 2011/2012 in 2012/2013, ko se je povečal s 3,22 milijona m2 na 33,31 milijona m2.
Exports from the PRC to India and Indonesia
Izvoz iz LRK v Indijo in Indonezijo
A dramatic increase of exports can also be observed from the PRC to India and Indonesia in the same period.
V istem obdobju je mogoče opaziti tudi izjemno veliko povečanje izvoza iz LRK v Indijo in Indonezijo.
Source: China customs Statistics
Vir: Statistični podatki kitajskih carinskih organov
Import volumes (millions of m2)
Obseg uvoza (v mio. m2)
Exports from the PRC to India
Izvoz iz LRK v Indijo
According to the Chinese customs statistics, imports from the PRC to India of the product under investigation increased from 4,8 million m2 in the financial year 2009/2010 to 29,3 million m2 in the financial year 2012/2013.
Glede na statistične podatke kitajskih carinskih organov se je uvoz izdelka v preiskavi iz LRK v Indijo povečal s 4,8 milijona m2 v obračunskem letu 2009/2010 na 29,3 milijona m2 v obračunskem letu 2012/2013.
Exports from the PRC to Indonesia
Izvoz iz LRK v Indonezijo
According to the Chinese customs statistics, imports from the PRC to Indonesia of the product under investigation increased from 5,78 million m2 in the financial year 2009/2010 to 11,54 million m2 in the financial year 2012/2013.
Glede na statistične podatke kitajskih carinskih organov se je uvoz izdelka v preiskavi iz LRK v Indonezijo povečal s 5,78 milijona m2 v obračunskem letu 2009/2010 na 11,54 milijona m2 v obračunskem letu 2012/2013.
The overall decrease of the exports from the PRC to the Union and the parallel increase of both exports from India and Indonesia to the Union and exports from the PRC to India and Indonesia, following the imposition of provisional measures in February 2011 and of definitive measures in August 2011, constitutes a change in the pattern of trade between the abovementioned countries, on the one hand, and of the exports of those countries to the Union, on the other hand.
Splošno zmanjšanje izvoza iz LRK v Unijo ter vzporedno povečanje tako izvoza iz Indije in Indonezije v Unijo ter izvoza iz LRK v Indijo in Indonezijo po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov februarja 2011 in dokončnih ukrepov avgusta 2011 pomeni spremembo v vzorcu trgovanja med navedenimi državami na eni strani in izvoza teh držav v Unijo na drugi.
The practice, process or work includes, inter alia, the consignment of the product subject to measures in force via third countries in accordance with Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 13(2) osnovne uredbe praksa, postopek ali dejavnost med drugim vključujejo pošiljko izdelka, za katerega veljajo ukrepi, preko tretjih držav.
During the investigation, evidence was found of transhipment practices via Indonesia and India and/or incorrect certificates of origin.
Med preiskavo so bili zbrani dokazi o praksah pretovarjanja prek Indonezije in Indije, in/ali nepravilnih potrdilih o poreklu.
For instance, some of the imports of the product concerned to the Union were transhipped through Dubai or Singapore with certificates of origin of Indonesia/India and a part of the imports to the Union was transhipped through an Indian company which did not cooperate in the investigation.
Na primer, del uvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo je bil pretovorjen prek Dubaja ali Singapurja s potrdili o poreklu iz Indije ali Indonezije, ki se pretovarjajo prek Dubaja ali Singapurja s potrdili o poreklu blaga Indonezije/Indije, del uvoza v Unijo pa je bil pretovorjen prek indijske družbe, ki ni sodelovala v preiskavi.
The lack of cooperation by any of the producers of the product under investigation, except Montex, is also an indication that there is no genuine production in Indonesia and India that could justify the export levels from Indonesia and India to the Union.
Nesodelovanje proizvajalcev izdelka v preiskavi, z izjemo družbe Montex, je pokazatelj, da v Indiji in Indoneziji ne obstaja pristna proizvodnja, ki bi lahko upravičila obseg izvoza iz Indonezije in Indije v Unijo.
It is reasonable to expect that if there are genuine producers, they would try to distinguish themselves from circumvention practices by participating in this investigation in the first place.
Smiselno je pričakovati, da bi se pristni proizvajalci želeli izločiti iz suma izvajanja praks izogibanja predvsem s sodelovanjem v tej preiskavi.
In addition, the investigation did not reveal evidence of genuine production in the two contries concerned, other than that of Montex.
Poleg tega preiskava ni razkrila dokazov o obstoju pristne proizvodnje, razen tiste družbe Montex.
Furthermore, the surge in imports from those two countries indicates that the Chinese products are transhipped to the Union through India and Indonesia and/or with incorrect certificates of origin.
Nadalje, porast uvoza iz teh dveh držav kaže na to, da so kitajski izdelki, namenjeni v Unijo, pretovorjeni prek Indije in Indonezije in/ali z nepravilnimi potrdili o poreklu.
The existence of transhipment of Chinese-origin products via India and Indonesia is therefore confirmed.
Obstoj pretovarjanja izdelkov kitajskega porekla prek Indije in Indonezije se zato potrdi.
No elements were found, other than the duty, which could be considered as a compensation for the costs of transhipment, in particular regarding transport and reloading, of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the PRC from the PRC via India and Indonesia.
Razen dajatve ni bilo nikakršnih elementov, ki bi lahko šteli za nadomestilo za stroške pretovarjanja, še zlasti glede prevoza in natovarjanja nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken s poreklom iz LRK iz LRK prek Indije in Indonezije.
Next, it was assessed whether the imports of the product under investigation into the Union had undermined the remedial effects of the measures in force in terms of quantities and prices.
Nato je bilo ocenjeno, ali je uvoz izdelka v preiskavi v Unijo oslabil popravljalne učinke veljavnih ukrepov v smislu količin in cen.
COMEXT data was used as the best data available concerning quantities and prices of exports by the non-cooperating companies in India and Indonesia.
Uporabljeni so bili podatki COMEXT kot najboljši razpoložljivi podatki o količinah in cenah izvoza nesodelujočih družb v Indiji in Indoneziji.
The prices so determined were compared to the injury elimination level established for the Union industry in recital (74) of the original Regulation.
Tako določene cene so se primerjale z ravnijo, ki je bila določena za odpravo škode za industrijo Unije v uvodni izjavi (74) prvotne uredbe.
To assess whether the remedial effects of the measures in force are undermined in terms of prices, the prices of the imports from Indonesia and India were compared with the injury elimination level as established in the original Regulation.
Za oceno, ali so bili popravljalni učinki veljavnih ukrepov oslabljeni v smislu cen, so bile primerjane cene uvoza iz Indonezije in Indije in s stopnjo odprave škode, kot je bila določena v prvotni uredbi.
The injury elimination level as established in the original Regulation was adjusted for inflation.
Stopnja odprave škode, kot je bila določena v prvotni uredbi, je bila prilagojena za inflacijo.
The weighted average export price of exports from India and Indonesia was adjusted for post importation costs and quality adjustments as established in the original investigation for imports from PRC.
Tehtana povprečna izvozna cena izvoza iz Indije in Indonezije je bila prilagojena za stroške po uvozu in prilagoditve kakovosti, kot je bila določena v prvotni preiskavi za uvoz iz LRK.
The comparison showed significantly lower export prices for exports from the countries concerned to the Union.
Primerjava je pokazala znatno nižje izvozne cene za izvoz iz zadevnih držav v Unijo.
It was therefore concluded that the remedial effects of the measures in force are also being undermined in terms of both quantities and prices.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da je popravljalni učinek veljavnih ukrepov oslabljen tudi v smislu količine in cene.
Finally, in accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation it was examined whether there was evidence of dumping.
Nazadnje je bilo v skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe preučeno, ali obstajajo dokazi o dampingu.
In line with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation the normal value as established in the original investigation was used.
V skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe je bila uporabljena normalna vrednost, predhodno določena v prvotni preiskavi.
The export prices from India and Indonesia were based on facts available under Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Izvozne cene iz Indije in Indonezije temeljijo na razpoložljivih dejstvih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
The export price was the average export price of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres from each of the two contries concerned during the RP as reported in COMEXT.
Izvozna cena je povprečna izvozna cena nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken iz vsake od obeh zadevnih držav v obdobju poročanja po podatkih COMEXT.
The exports of the Indian company Montex were not reflected in the statistics due to the misclassification of their products (see recital 25 above), and were not used for the calculation of the dumping margin.
Izvoz indijske družbe Montex ni vključen v statističnih podatkih zaradi napačnih razvrstitev njenih izdelkov (glej uvodno izjavo (25)), in ni bil uporabljen za izračun stopnje dampinga.
Given that data available did not allow to establish the level of the adjustments to be made, the adjustments had to be established on the basis of the best facts available.
Glede na to, da na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov ni bilo mogoče določiti potrebne stopnje prilagoditve, je bilo treba prilagoditve določiti na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
Thus, the adjustment for these allowances was based on a percentage calculated as the proportion of the total transport, insurance and packing costs over the value of the Union sales transactions with CIF delivery terms provided by the cooperating Chinese exporting producers in the original investigation.
Tako je prilagoditev za te razlike temeljila na deležu, izračunanem kot deležih skupnih stroškov prevoza, zavarovanja in pakiranja v vrednosti prodajnih transakcij v Uniji pod dobavnimi pogoji CIF, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki v prvotni preiskavi.
In accordance with Articles 2(11) and 2(12) of the basic Regulation, dumping was calculated by comparing the weighted average normal value as established in the original Regulation and the corresponding weighted average export prices of the two countries concerned during this investigation's RP, expressed as a percentage of the CIF price at the Union frontier duty unpaid.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe je bil damping izračunan na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti, kot je bila določena v prvotni uredbi, in ustreznih tehtanih povprečnih izvoznih cen za zadevni državi v obdobju poročanja te preiskave ter izražen kot delež cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve.
In view of the above, it is concluded that the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the PRC was circumvented by transhipment via India and Indonesia within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na navedeno je bilo ugotovljeno izogibanje dokončni protidampinški dajatvi, uvedeni na uvoz nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken s poreklom iz LRK, s pretovarjanjem prek Indije in Indonezije v okviru člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with the first sentence of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the measures in force on imports of the product concerned, should be extended to imports of the same product but consigned from India and Indonesia, whether declared as originating in India and Indonesia or not.
V skladu s prvim stavkom člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe bi bilo treba veljavne ukrepe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka razširiti na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega iz Indije in Indonezije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot izdelek s poreklom iz Indije in Indonezije ali ne.
The measures to be extended should be the measures established in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 791/2011 for ‘all other companies’, which is a definitive anti-dumping duty of 62,9 % applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty.
Ukrepi, ki jih je treba razširiti, so ukrepi iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 791/2011 za „vsa druga podjetja“, in sicer dokončna protidampinška dajatev v višini 62,9 %, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Unije, pred plačilom dajatve.
In accordance with Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, which provides that any extended measure should apply to imports which entered the Union under registration imposed by the initiating Regulation, duties should be collected on those registered imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres consigned from India and Indonesia.
V skladu s členom 13(3) in členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe, ki določata, da bi se moral vsak razširjeni ukrep uporabljati za uvoz, za katerega v Uniji velja registracija, uvedena z uredbo o začetku preiskave, bi bilo treba pobirati dajatve za navedeni registrirani uvoz nekaterih tkanin z odprto mrežno strukturo iz steklenih vlaken, poslanih iz Indije in Indonezije.