natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The table below summarises the investment costs, operating costs, expected return on investment and aid amount planned for the construction of the Žilina terminal as calculated in the cost-benefit analysis submitted by the Slovak authorities.
Za zagotovitev nediskriminacijskega dostopa do terminalov ter za preprečitev nasprotja interesov med izbranim upravljavcem terminala in prevoznimi podjetji bo upravljavec terminalov deloval neodvisno od prevoznih podjetij.
Slovak authorities, cost-benefit analysis
Poleg tega bo slovaška država ostala lastnica terminalov in bo v vsak koncesijski sporazum vključila obveznost upravljavca terminalov, da nediskriminacijsko zagotavlja odprt dostop vsem uporabnikom, vključno s prevozniki in upravljavci intermodalnih prometnih terminalov.
(in EUR millions)
Če izbrani upravljavec ne izpolnjuje tega pogoja koncesijskega sporazuma, bo lahko država umaknila koncesijo in zanjo znova objavila javni razpis.
Terminal
Zato bo dostop do zadevne infrastrukture nediskriminacijsko odprt vsem uporabnikom.
Investment costs
Pomoč ne povzroča izkrivljanj konkurence v nasprotju s skupnim interesom
Operating costs
Ukrep, kot je bil prvotno priglašen, bi vplival na storitve intermodalnih terminalov v Slovaški republiki, po katerih je tudi veliko čezmejnega povpraševanja iz Avstrije, Češke in Madžarske, nekoliko manj pa s Poljske.
Total costs
Slovaški organi so se za izognitev tveganju izkrivljanja konkurence, kot je določeno v sklepu o začetku postopka, in za preskus predpostavk v zvezi z učinkom terminala na prehod s cestnega prevoza blaga na železniški prevoz blaga odločili omejiti projekt na izgradnjo enega samega poskusnega terminala Žilina – Teplička.
Revenu
Ta terminal bo od sedanjih terminalov družb Metrans in WienCont oddaljen več kot 200 km.
State aid
Terminalsko območje, na katerem bo zgrajen, se torej ne bo prekrivalo z območjem družb Metrans in WienCont.
Expected profit
To bo omejilo učinek ukrepa na konkurenco [26].
NPV after state aid (5 %)
Po mnenju slovaških organov obstaja v Žilini začasni terminal v lasti družbe Intrans.
As the initial investment is limited to the funding gap of the project, the Commission concludes that the aid is necessary to ensure the construction of the intermodal transfer terminal and the development of combined transport in Slovakia.
V nasprotju z načrtovanim terminalom je ta terminal majhen in je v središču mesta.
It also takes the view that the aid will be kept to the minimum necessary, since it is greater than the funding gap and is, therefore, proportionate for achieving the common interest objective of ensuring the shift from road transport to rail transport.
Nakladalna rampa v tem terminalu je dostopna z enega samega 400-metrskega tira, ki ga ni mogoče razširiti.
The access to the infrastructure in question is open to all users on a non-discriminatory basis
Terminal je oblikovan za ladijske zabojnike, zato v njem ni niti prekladalnih mostov niti opreme za pretovarjanje zamenljivih tovorišč in polpriklopnikov.
The purpose of the measure is to construct public intermodal transfer terminals for continental combined transport, in particular semi-trailers and swap-bodies, in order to support the shift from road to rail transport.
Zaradi urbanističnega razvoja se bo obstoječi terminal v Žilini v bližnji prihodnosti v vsakem primeru zaprl.
To achieve this objective, the terminals will:
Slovaški organi so potrdili, da bodo manipulativni stroški v javnih terminalih enaki manipulativnim stroškom intermodalnih prometnih terminalov, ki že delujejo na trgu.
be operated by companies independent of the transport companies using them;
Komisija je zato sklenila, da ukrep ne izkrivlja konkurence v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnim interesom.
provide for open access;
SKLEPNE UGOTOVITVE
offer non-discriminatory and transparent conditions.
Pod temi pogoji je Komisija sklenila, da so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji in da je pomoč za naložbo v terminal Žilina – Teplička v višini 25,04 milijona EUR združljiva z notranjim trgom.
In order to ensure non-discriminatory access to the terminals and to prevent a conflict of interests from arising between the selected terminal operator and the transport undertakings, the operator of the terminals will be independent of the transport undertakings.
Glede na prvotni načrt Slovaške za izgradnjo štirih javnih intermodalnih terminalov Komisija zahteva spremljanje terminala, ki mora biti zgrajen na podlagi zdaj priglašenega poskusnega projekta.
Moreover, the Slovak State will remain the owner of the terminals and will include in any concession agreement the obligation for the operator of the terminals to guarantee open access to all users, including all transporters and operators of intermodal transport terminals, on a non-discriminatory basis.
To spremljanje bo omogočilo Komisiji, da sprejme še bolj utemeljen sklep o nujnosti pomoči in njenem učinku na konkurenco, če bi Slovaška v prihodnosti priglasila pomoč za preostale tri terminale –
If the selected operator fails to fulfil this condition of the concession agreement, the State will have the power to withdraw the concession and put it out to tender again.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Therefore, the access to the infrastructure in question will be open to all users on a non-discriminatory basis.
Člen 1
The aid does not lead to distortions of competition contrary to the common interest
Državna pomoč Slovaške republike za izgradnjo terminala Žilina – Teplička v obliki začetne pomoči za naložbo v višini 25,04 milijona EUR je združljiva z notranjim trgom v smislu člena 93 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The measure as originally notified would affect intermodal terminal services in the Slovak Republic, which also attracts cross-border demand from Austria, the Czech Republic, Hungary and, to a lesser extent, Poland.
Izvajanje te pomoči v višini 25,04 milijona EUR se zato odobri.
In order to avoid the risk of distortion of competition, as set out in the decision initiating the procedure, and in order to test their assumption regarding the impact of the terminal on shifting goods transport from road to rail, the Slovak authorities undertook to limit the project to building a single pilot project terminal in Žilina-Teplička.
Člen 2
This terminal will be more than 200 km from the current Metrans and WienCont terminals.
Slovaška republika v roku treh let predloži naslednje informacije:
Unlike the planned terminal, this terminal is small and located in the centre of the town.
Člen 3
At this terminal the loading ramp is accessible only from a single track 400 m long, which it is not possible to extend.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Slovaško republiko.
The terminal is designed for sea containers and does not have any gantry cranes or equipment for transhipment of swap bodies and semi-trailers.
V Bruslju, 17. julija 2013
Due to town-planning developments, the existing Žilina terminal will in any case be closed in the near future.
Za Komisijo
The Slovak authorities have confirmed that the handling charges at the public terminals will correspond to the handling charges of the intermodal transport terminals already operating in the market.
Podpredsednik
According to a survey conducted by the Slovak authorities, the handing charges at terminals in the EU are between EUR 16,30 and EUR 56 per unit, the average charge being EUR 30.
UL C 45, 16.2.2013, str. 13.
The cost-benefit analysis submitted by the Slovak authorities was based on the assumption that the future handling charges per unit at all four public terminals would be EUR 28-29.
Glej opombo 1.
The charges at the public terminal in Žilina-Teplička will, therefore, be set to maintain the competitiveness of rail transport compared with the road sector.
Teoretična vrednost pretovarjanja ob obstoječi ureditvi ter uporabi tehnik ravnanja in procesne tehnologije
Increased fees would mean that the operator of the public terminals would be unable to attract enough cargo from the road transport sector to cover its operating costs.
Teoretična vrednost pretovarjanja v novih terminalih po končani prvi fazi izgradnje
The Commission therefore concludes that the measure does not distort competition to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Direktiva 2012/34/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. novembra 2012 o vzpostavitvi enotnega evropskega železniškega območja (UL L 343, 14.12.2012, str. 32).
CONCLUSION
Mednarodno združenje za kombinirani cestno-železniški prevoz:
In view of the above, the Commission concludes that all the conditions are fulfilled and the investment aid of EUR 25,04 million for the Žilina-Teplička terminal is compatible with the internal market.
http://www.uirr.com/en/media-centre/annual-reports/annual-reports/mediacentre/516-annual-report-2011.html.
Given Slovakia's original plan to build four public intermodal terminals, the Commission requires monitoring of the terminal that is to be built on the basis of the pilot project currently notified.
Mednarodna železniška zveza:
This monitoring will allow the Commission to take a more solid decision on the necessity of the aid and its effect on competition, if at some point in the future Slovakia notifies aid for the remaining three terminals,
http://www.uic.org/IMG/pdf/2012_report_on_combined_transport_in_europe.pdf.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Glej med drugim sodbo z dne 24. oktobra 2002 v zadevi Aéroports de Paris proti Komisiji, C-82/01P, Recueil, str.
Article 1
I-9297, ter sodbo z dne 24. marca 2011 v združenih zadevah Freistaat Sachsen in Land Sachsen-Anhalt proti Komisiji, T-443/08 in T-445/08, ki še ni bila objavljena v Zbirki odločb.
The State aid which the Slovak Republic is planning to implement for the construction of the terminal in Žilina-Teplička in the form of initial investment aid of EUR 25,04 million is compatible with the internal market within the meaning of Article 93 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Sodba z dne 30. aprila 1998 v zadevi Het Vlaamse Gewest (Flamska regija) proti Komisiji, T-214/95, Recueil, str.
Article 2
Odločba Sodišča z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi Altmark Trans GmbH, C-280/00, Recueil, str.
In three years' time the Slovak Republic shall provide the following information:
I-7747.
the total volume of intermodal transport, the volume of continental transport and the volume of transport using means other than ISO containers in Slovakia and at the Žilina-Teplička terminal;
Glej Sklep Komisije z dne 11. februarja 2009 v zadevi Multimodalni kontejnerski terminal Combinant (Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj), N 651/2008 (UL C 60, 14.3.2009, str.
the prices charged at the Žilina-Teplička terminal;
4).
whether the clients of the new terminals had previously been using the existing terminals and, if so, a survey on why they switched.
Uredba (ES) št. 1370/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o javnih storitvah železniškega in cestnega potniškega prevoza ter o razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 1191/69 in št. 1107/70 (UL L 315, 3.12.2007, str. 1).
Article 3
Sodba z dne 21. septembra 1978 v zadevi Komisija proti Belgiji, C-156/77, Recueil, str.
This Decision is addressed to the Slovak Republic.
I-1881, točka 10.
Done at Brussels, 17 July 2013.
Glej Sklep Komisije z dne 20. julija 2010 v zadevi Firmin srl, C 17/10 (UL C 278, 15.10.2010, str. 28).
For the Commission
Direktiva Sveta 92/106/EGS z dne 7. decembra 1992 o oblikovanju enotnih pravil za določene vrste kombiniranega prevoza blaga med državami članicami (UL L 368, 17.12.1992, str. 38).
Vice-President
Načrt za enotni evropski prometni prostor – na poti h konkurenčnemu in z viri gospodarnemu prometnemu sistemu, COM(2011) 144, 28.3.2011.
OJ C 45, 16.2.2013, p. 13.
Sporočilo – Evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva, COM(2008) 800 final, 26.11.2008.
Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area (OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 32).
Glej Sklep Komisije z dne 31. januarja 2001 v zadevi Nizozemska – Subsidieregeling voor bijzondere bedrijfsaansluitingen op vaarwegen, N 597/2000, Sklep Komisije z dne 14. septembra 2001 v zadevi Nizozemska – SOIT, N 208/2000, Sklep Komisije z dne 15. novembra 2000 v zadevi Italija – Bolzano, N 755/1999, in Sklep Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2010 v zadevi Belgija – Verlenging van steunregeling N 550/2001 inzake publiek-private samenwerking voor de bouw van laad- en losinstallaties langs de waterwegen in het Vlaams Gewest, N 490/2010.
See, inter alia, Case C-82/01P Aéroports de Paris [2002] ECR I-9297 and Cases T-443/08 and T-445/08 Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v Commission, not yet published in the European Court Reports.
Na območju Prage je 7 terminalov, ki delujejo na 70 km:
See, in particular, Case 730/79 Philip Morris v Commission [1980] ECR 2671, paragraph 11;
2 velika terminala v Pragi, 2 v Mělníku (40 km) in 3 v Lovosicah (70 km).
Case C-53/00 Ferring [2001] ECR I-9067, paragraph 21;
Komisija je v elektronski pošti z dne 9. junija 2011 od družbe Metrans prejela dodatne informacije.
and Case C-372/97 Italy v Commission [2004] ECR I-3679, paragraph 44.
Pritožba je bila evidentirana kot zadeva SA.32828.
Case T-214/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest v Commission [1998] ECR II-717.
Sklep o začetku postopka je bil v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] objavljen 16. februarja 2013.
See Commission Decision of 31 January 2001 in Case N 597/2000, OJ C 102, 31.3.2001, p. 8;
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo svoje pripombe o zadevnih ukrepih v enem mesecu od dneva objave.
Commission Decision of 14 September 2001 in Case N 208/2000, OJ C 315, 4.1.2000, p. 21;
Komisija je družbi WienCont 7. marca 2013 odobrila podaljšanje do 18. marca 2013.
Commission Decision of 15 November 2000 in Case N 755/1999, OJ C 71, 3.3.2001, p. 17 and 19 ;
Komisija je pripombe na sklep o začetku postopka od družbe WienCont prejela 18. marca 2013.
Commission Decision of 11 November 2001 in Case N 550/01, OJ C 24, 26.1.2002, p. 2.
Slovaška načrtuje za izgradnjo terminala, ki ga bo zgradila država in bo v državni lasti, začetno naložbo v višini 25,04 milijona EUR.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH [2003] ECR I-7747.
Ta znesek, ki bo financiran iz Kohezijskega sklada (85 %) in državnih sredstev (15 %), bo zajemal 100 % stroškov začetne naložbe.
See Commission Decision of 11 February 2009 in Case N 651/08 — Combinant multimodal container terminal (EFRO), OJ C 60, 14.3.2009, p. 4.
ali je obstajala potreba po izgradnji intermodalnih prometnih terminalov in razvoju kombiniranega celinskega prevoza na Slovaškem za spodbujanje prehoda z železniškega prevoza na prevoz po celinskih plovnih poteh ter
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 1).
Bratislava — ÚNS
Case C-156/77 Commission v Belgium [1978] ECR I-1881, paragraph 10.
Bratislava — Prístav
See Commission Decision of 20 July 2010 in Case C 17/10, Firmin srl, OJ C 278, 15.10.2010, p. 28.
Žilina — Intrans
Council Directive 92/106/EEC of 7 December 1992 on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States (OJ L 368, 17.12.1992, p. 38).
Košice — Intrans
Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area — Towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system, COM(2011)144 of 28.3.2011.
Košice — Haniska
Communication ‘A European Economic Recovery Plan’, COM(2008) 800 final, 26.11.2008.
Žilina — Teplička
Decision No 661/2010/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (OJ L 204, 5.8.2010, p. 1).
Košice — Bočiar
COM(2011) 650 final, OJ C 37, 10.2.2012, p. 16.
Po mnenju slovaških organov bodo ta pravila zagotavljala ustrezen ureditveni okvir, ki bo zmanjšal učinek prevzemanja obstoječih strank iz obstoječih terminalov.
See Commission Decision of 31 January 2001 in Case N 597/2000, Netherlands — Subsidieregeling voor bijzondere bedrijfsaansluitingen op vaarwegen, Commission Decision of 14 September 2001 in Case N 208/2000, Netherlands — SOIT, Commission Decision of 15 November 2000 in Case N 755/1999, Italy — Bolzano, and Commission Decision of 20 December 2010 in Case N 490/2010, Belgium — Verlenging van steunregeling N 550/2001 inzake publiek-private samenwerking voor de bouw van laad- en losinstallaties langs de waterwegen in het Vlaams Gewest.
Sklicuje se tudi na novejšo napoved družbe Snizek & Partner (2011), v kateri je predvideno povečanje prevoza blaga brez spremstva s 300000 intermodalnih prevoznih enot leta 2008 na 440000 intermodalnih prevoznih enot leta 2030.
In its decision of 9 November 2011 in Case SA.32632 (2011/N) ETGE, OJ C 82, 21.3.2012, p. 2, paragraph 15, the Commission refers to an attraction radius of 35 km in an area with a high density of terminals (Belgian-Dutch border).
Prihranki pri zunanjih stroških;
The Slovak authorities reckon on a catchment area of 100 km.
obstoječe zmogljivosti so zadovoljive, trg pa lahko zadovolji povečano povpraševanje
2 large terminals in Prague, 2 in Mělník (40 km) and 3 in Lovosice (70 km).
Analiza stroškov in koristi, ki so jo predložili slovaški organi, je temeljila na predpostavki, da bodo prihodnji manipulativni stroški na enoto v vseh štirih javnih terminalih 28–29 EUR.
By e-mail of 6 April 2011 the Commission received a complaint from Metrans/Danubia/, a.s.
Stroški v javnem terminalu Žilina – Teplička bodo torej določeni tako, da bodo ohranjali konkurenčnost železniškega prevoza v primerjavi s sektorjem cestnega prevoza.
(‘Metrans’) concerning alleged State aid granted for the construction of public intermodal transfer terminals (‘the complaint’).
Povečane uporabnine bi pomenile, da upravljavec javnih terminalov ne more privabiti dovolj tovora iz sektorja cestnega prevoza, da bi lahko pokril svoje operativne stroške.
The Commission received further information from Metrans by e-mail dated 9 June 2011.
Leta 2012 je upravljala z 72541 intermodalnimi prevoznimi enoti, leta 2011 pa z 71369 intermodalnimi prevoznimi enotami, pri čemer je prevoz s Slovaške leta 2012 znašal 2968 intermodalnih prevoznih enot, leta 2011 pa 2148 intermodalnih prevoznih enot, medtem ko se na Slovaško leta 2012 ni prevozila nobena intermodalna prevozna enota, leta 2011 pa 59 intermodalnih prevoznih enot.
The complaint was registered as case SA.32828.
V skladu s prednostnimi nalogami EU glede politike železniškega prevoza Slovaška vlaga v infrastrukturo, ki bo omogočala prevoz 750-metrskih vlakov.
By e-mail of 12 July 2012 Metrans transmitted a letter of support to the Commission from Green Integrated Logistics (Slovakia) s.r.o.
Slovaška poleg tega meni, da terminala družbe Metrans v Dunajski Stredi ni mogoče razširiti, saj ga na eni strani omejuje cesta E575, na drugi pa zavoj proge, ki povezuje terminal z glavnim železniškim omrežjem.
(‘GIL’), which operates the transfer terminal in Sládkovičovo.
Glej zlasti sodbo z dne 17. septembra 1980 v zadevi Philip Morris proti Komisiji, C-730/79, Recueil, str. 2671, točka 11, sodbo z dne 22. novembra 2001 v zadevi Ferring, C-53/00, Recueil, str.
As part of that notification, Slovakia submitted letters of support from DHL Express (Slovakia), s.r.o.
I-9067, točka 21, in sodbo z dne 29. aprila 2004 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji, C-372/97, Recueil, str.
(‘DHL’), GEFCO Slovakia, s.r.o., Bohemiakombi, s.r.o. and Kombiverkehr.
I-3679, točka 44.
The opening decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] on 16 February 2013.
Glej Sklep Komisije z dne 31. januarja 2001 v zadevi N 597/2000 (UL C 102, 31.3.2001, str.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures in question within one month of the publication date.
8), Sklep Komisije z dne 14. septembra 2001 v zadevi N 208/2000 (UL C 315, 4.1.2000, str.
on 6 March 2013 WienCont Container Terminal Gesellschaft m.b.H.
21), Sklep Komisije z dne 15. novembra 2000 v zadevi N 755/1999 (UL C 71, 3.3.2001, str.
(‘WienCont’) requested an extension of the deadline for submitting its comments.
17 in 19), Sklep Komisije z dne 11. novembra 2001 v zadevi N 550/01 (UL C 24, 26.1.2002, str.
The Commission received the comments on the opening decision from WienCont on 18 March 2013.
DRUŽBA BOHEMIAKOMBI
Slovakia plans an initial investment of EUR 25,04 million for the construction of the terminal, which will be built and owned by the State.
DRUŽBA KOMBIVERKEHR
whether there was a need for the construction of the intermodal transfer terminals and the development of continental combined transport in Slovakia in order to encourage a modal shift from road to rail and inland-waterway transport; and
DRUŽBA METRANS
on the measures SA.23425 (11/C) (ex NN 41/10) implemented by Italy in 2004 and 2009 for SACE BT S.p.A.
o ukrepih SA.23425 (11/C) (ex NN 41/10) Italije leta 2004 in 2009 za SACE BT S.p.A.
(notified under document C(2013) 1501)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2013) 1501)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 108(2) Pogodbe,
By a complaint lodged on 5 June 2007, registered on 7 June 2007, the Commission was informed that, in May 2004, SACE S.p.A.
Komisija je bila s pritožbo, vloženo 5. junija 2007 in evidentirano 7. junija 2007, obveščena, da je družba SACE S.p.A. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SACE) maja 2004 svoji novo ustanovljeni odvisni družbi SACE BT S.p.A.
By letter dated 6 November 2009, the complainant submitted additional arguments to support its complaint and informed the Commission about an additional measure in the form of reinsurance cover provided by SACE to SACE BT in 2009 (‘the second measure’).
Z dopisom z dne 23. februarja 2011 je Komisija Italijo obvestila, da bo začela postopek iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije glede štirih ukrepov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka).
During its preliminary investigation, the Commission discovered that SACE BT had benefited from two capital injections granted by SACE on 18 June and 4 August 2009 (respective ‘the third measure’ and ‘the fourth measure’).
Sklep Komisije, da začne postopek, je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
By letter dated 23 February 2011, the Commission informed Italy that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in respect of the four measures (‘the opening decision’).
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo svoje pripombe o ukrepih.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Italija je 5. maja 2011 predložila svoj odgovor na sklep o začetku postopka.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures.
Komisija je 23. junija 2011 zahtevala dodatne informacije.
SACE annexed thereto various supporting documents, including a resubmission of the business plan for 2005-2008 for the operation of the short-term insurance prepared by SACE with the help of an external advisor, KPMG, and approved by the Board on 18 May 2004 (‘the initial business plan’), a letter from an external advisor of 7 July 2004, specifying the additional services provided (‘the advisor letter’), supplementary analyses to the business plan regarding the Italian market of the commercial information, the Italian market of the recovery of credits and its principal actors and the credit insurance market in the Central and Eastern Europe of March 2004 (‘the supplements to the business plan’), the adjustment of the Business Plan 2005-2009 approved on 19 November 2004 (‘the adjusted business plan’), extracts of the minutes of the Board of 28 April 2004, 18 May 2004, a business plan regarding potential acquisition of Assicuratrice Edile S.p.A. of May 2005 (‘Assedile acquisition business plan’), revised budget for SACE BT of 31 March 2009, SACE BT business plan for 2010-2011 of 4 August 2009 (‘the 2010-2011 business plan’).
Po tem srečanju je bil zahtevek po informacijah, poslan 23. junija 2011, dopolnjen z dodatnimi vprašanji z razprav.