natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Administrative arrangements with third countries on catch certificates for fisheries products are listed in Annex IX to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1010/2009 of 22 October 2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 [2].
Upravne ureditve s tretjimi državami v zvezi s potrdili o ulovu za ribiške proizvode so navedene v Prilogi IX k Uredbi (ES) št. 1010/2009 z dne 22. oktobra 2009 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 1005/2008 [2].
The New Zealand authorities have amended the layout of the New Zealand catch certificate specimen.
Organi Nove Zelandije so spremenili obliko vzorcev potrdil o ulovu.
Done at Brussels, 9 September 2013.
V Bruslju, 9. septembra 2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 866/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 866/2013
amending Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 as regards transit of consignments of poultry meat from Belarus through Lithuania to the Russian territory of Kaliningrad
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 798/2008 o tranzitu pošiljk perutninskega mesa iz Belorusije skozi Litvo na rusko ozemlje Kaliningrad
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption [1] and in particular the introductory phrase of Article 8, the first paragraph of point 1 of Article 8, point 4 of Article 8 and Article 9(4)(c) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/99/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o predpisih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih prehrani ljudi [1], in zlasti uvodnega stavka člena 8, prvega odstavka točke 1 člena 8, točke 4 člena 8 in člena 9(4)(c) Direktive,
Directive 2002/99/EC lays down the general animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution within the Union and the introduction from third countries of products of animal origin for human consumption and provides for establishing specific rules and certification for transit.
Direktiva 2002/99/ES določa splošne predpise v zvezi z zdravjem živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo in distribucijo proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi, v Uniji ter njihov uvoz iz tretjih držav, ter posebna pravila in certificiranje za tranzit.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 of 8 August 2008 laying down a list of third countries, territories, zones or compartments from which poultry and poultry products may be imported into and transit through the Community and the veterinary certification requirements [2] lays down that certain commodities are only to be imported into and transit through the Union from third countries, territories, zones or compartments listed in the table in Part 1 of Annex I thereto.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 798/2008 z dne 8. avgusta 2008 o določitvi seznama tretjih držav, ozemelj, območij ali kompartmentov, iz katerih se dovolita uvoz perutnine in perutninskih proizvodov v Skupnost in njihov tranzit skozi Skupnost, ter zahtevah za izdajanje veterinarskih spričeval [2] določa, da sta uvoz nekaterih proizvodov v Unijo in njihov tranzit skozi Unijo dovoljena samo iz tretjih držav, ozemelj, območij ali kompartmentov iz tabele v delu 1 Priloge I k navedeni uredbi.
Those requirements take also into account whether or not additional guarantees are requested due to the disease status of those third countries, territories, zones or compartments.
Navedene zahteve prav tako upoštevajo, ali so zaradi statusa navedenih tretjih držav, ozemelj, območij ali kompartmentov potrebna dodatna jamstva.
Article 4(4) of Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 requires that specified pathogen-free eggs, meat, minced meat and mechanically separated meat of poultry, ratites and wild game-birds, eggs and egg products transiting through the Union shall be accompanied by a certificate drawn up in accordance with the model certificate set out in Annex XI and complying with the conditions set out in that certificate.
Člen 4(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 798/2008 določa, da jajca, prosta specificiranih patogenov, meso, mleto meso in mehansko izkoščeno meso perutnine, ratitov in divjih ptic ter jajca in jajčni izdelki, ki so namenjeni za tranzit skozi Unijo, spremlja spričevalo, ki je pripravljeno v skladu z vzorcem spričevala iz Priloge XI in izpolnjuje pogoje iz navedenega spričevala.
Belarus requested the Commission to authorise the transit through the Union of poultry meat from Belarus through Lithuania to the Russian territory of Kaliningrad.
Belorusija je Komisijo zaprosila, da odobri tranzit skozi Unijo perutninskega mesa iz Belorusije skozi Litvo na rusko ozemlje Kaliningrad.
Owing to the geographical situation of Kaliningrad and the already existing procedural structures laid down in Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 with regard to transit of commodities from and bound to Russia, the transit of poultry meat from Belarus through Lithuania to the Russian territory of Kaliningrad by rail or road should be permitted, provided the conditions laid down in Article 18(2), (3) and (4) for other commodities are complied with.
Zaradi geografske lege Kaliningrada in že obstoječih postopkovnih struktur iz člena 18(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 798/2008 v zvezi s tranzitom blaga iz ali v Rusijo bi bilo treba dovoliti železniški ali cestni tranzit perutninskega mesa iz Belorusije skozi Litvo na rusko ozemlje Kaliningrad, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 18(2), (3) in (4), ki veljajo za drugo blago.
Regulation (EC) No 798/2008 should be amended in order to include the commodity poultry meat in its Article 18(2) and to modify the entry for Belarus in Part 1 of Annex I to that Regulation.
Uredbo (ES) št. 798/2008 bi bilo treba spremeniti, da bi člen 18(2) vključeval perutninsko meso in da bi se prilagodil vnos za Belorusijo v delu 1 Priloge I k navedeni uredbi.
The introductory paragraph in Article 18(2) is replaced by the following:
uvodni odstavek člena 18(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
By way of derogation from Article 4(4), transit by road or rail shall be authorised between the border inspection posts in Lithuania listed in the Annex to Decision 2009/821/EC, of consignments of eggs, egg products and poultry meat coming from Belarus and bound for the Russian territory of Kaliningrad, where the following conditions are met:’
Z odstopanjem od člena 4(4) se dovoli cestni ali železniški tranzit med mejnimi kontrolnimi točkami v Litvi, ki so navedene v Prilogi k Odločbi 2009/821/ES, za pošiljke jajc, jajčnih izdelkov in perutninskega mesa, ki prihajajo iz Belorusije in so namenjene na rusko ozemlje Kaliningrad, kadar so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:“;
In Part 1 the entry for Belarus is replaced by the following:
v delu 1 se vnos za Belorusijo nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘BY – Belarus
„BY – Belorusija
EP, E and POU (only for transit through Lithuania)
EP, E in POU (samo za tranzit skozi Litvo)
In Part 2, in the section ‘Additional guarantees (AG)’, the entry ‘IX’ is replaced by the following:
v delu 2 se v oddelku „Dodatna jamstva (DJ)“ vnos „IX“ nadomesti z naslednjim:
only transit through Lithuania of consignments of eggs, egg products and poultry meat originating in Belarus and bound for the Russian territory of Kaliningrad shall be permitted provided that Article 18(2), (3) and (4) is complied with.’
Dovoljen je samo tranzit skozi Litvo za pošiljke jajc, jajčnih izdelkov in perutninskega mesa, ki imajo poreklo iz Belorusije in so namenjene na rusko ozemlje Kaliningrad, če so izpolnjene zahteve iz člena 18(2), (3) in (4).“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 867/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 867/2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 868/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 868/2013
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Garbanzo de Escacena (PGI))
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Garbanzo de Escacena (ZGO))
Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Garbanzo de Escacena’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
V skladu s členom 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je bila vloga Španije za registracijo imena „Garbanzo de Escacena“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Garbanzo de Escacena’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Ker v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 Komisija ni prejela nobene izjave o ugovoru, bi bilo treba ime „Garbanzo de Escacena“ registrirati –
OJ C 300, 5.10.2012, p. 19.
UL C 300, 5.10.2012, str. 19.
Garbanzo de Escacena (PGI)
Garbanzo de Escacena (ZGO)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 869/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 869/2013
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 875/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 875/2013
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels originating in Thailand following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih vrst pripravljene ali konzervirane sladke koruze v zrnju s poreklom iz Tajske po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa na podlagi člena 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’) and in particular Articles 9 and 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), ter zlasti člena 9 in člena 11(2) Uredbe,
The Council, following an anti-dumping investigation (‘the original investigation’), imposed, by means of Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 [2], a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels currently falling within CN codes ex20019030 and ex20058000 originating in Thailand (‘the definitive anti-dumping measures’).
Svet je na podlagi protidampinške preiskave („prvotna preiskava“) z Uredbo (ES) št. 682/2007 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz nekaterih vrst pripravljene ali konzervirane sladke koruze v zrnju, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznaki KN ex20019030 in ex20058000, s poreklom iz Tajske („dokončni protidampinški ukrepi“).
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty ranging between 3,1 % and 12,9 %.
Ukrepi so bili sprejeti kot dajatev ad valorem v višini od 3,1 % do 12,9 %.
The amended duties range between 3,1 % and 14,3 %.
Spremenjene dajatve se tako gibljejo med 3,1 % in 14,3 %.
Imports from two Thai exporting producers from whom undertakings had been accepted by Commission Decision 2007/424/EC [4] were exempted from the duty.
Uvoz od dveh tajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, katerih zavezi sta bili sprejeti s Sklepom Komisije 2007/424/ES [4], je bil oproščen dajatev.
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 847/2009 [5], considered that price undertakings with fixed minimum import prices were no longer appropriate to counteract the injurious effect of dumping.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 847/2009 [5] sprejel stališče, da cenovne zaveze s fiksno minimalno uvozno ceno niso več primerne za izravnavanje škodljivega učinka dampinga.
Consequently, the accepted undertakings were withdrawn and the undertaking offers by 10 other Thai exporting producers were rejected.
Posledično so bile sprejete zaveze preklicane, ponudbe o zavezah desetih drugih tajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov pa zavrnjene.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [6] of the definitive anti-dumping measures in force, the Commission received on 19 March 2012 a request for the initiation of an expiry review of those measures pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 19. marca 2012 po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [6] veljavnih dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka teh ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by the Association Européenne des Transformateurs de Maïs Doux (AETMD) (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion of the total Union production of prepared or preserved sweetcorn — in this case more than 50 %.
Zahtevek je vložilo združenje Association Européenne des Transformateurs de Maïs Doux (AETMD) („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki prispevajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje pripravljene ali konzervirane sladke koruze v Uniji.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced, on 19 June 2012, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [7] (‘the notice of initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, in je 19. junija 2012 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [7] („obvestilo o začetku“), napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
Investigation
Preiskava.
The investigation of a continuation of dumping covered the period from 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2012 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Preiskava nadaljevanja dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2011 do 31. marca 2012 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation of injury covered the period from 1 January 2008 to the end of the review investigation period (‘the period considered’).
Proučitev gibanja, pomembnega za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2008 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obravnavano obdobje“).
Parties concerned by the proceedings
Strani, ki jih postopek zadeva
The Commission officially advised the applicants, the other known Union producers, the exporting producers in Thailand, the unrelated importers, the users known to be concerned, and the representatives of the exporting country, of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila vložnike, druge znane proizvajalce Unije, proizvajalce izvoznike na Tajskem, nepovezane uvoznike, uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in predstavnike države izvoznice.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane strani so imele možnost, da svoja stališča predstavijo v pisni obliki in zahtevajo zaslišanje v roku iz obvestila o začetku.
All interested parties, who so requested and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard, were granted a hearing.
Zaslišanje je bilo odobreno vsem zainteresiranim stranem, ki so ga zahtevale in dokazale, da zanj obstajajo posebni razlogi.
In view of the apparent large number of exporting producers in Thailand and unrelated importers in the Union involved in the investigation, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov na Tajskem in nepovezanih uvoznikov v Uniji, ki so bili vključeni v preiskavo, je bilo v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the above-mentioned parties were requested to make themselves known to the Commission within 15 days of the initiation of the review and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in v tem primeru izbrala vzorec, so bile navedene strani pozvane, naj se v 15 dneh po začetku pregleda javijo Komisiji in ji predložijo zahtevane informacije iz obvestila o začetku.
As regard to the selection of the sample of the exporting producers in Thailand, the Commission received complete information from 17 exporting producers, out of which 9 had exports to the Union during the RIP.
Komisija je popolne informacije v zvezi z izbiro vzorca proizvajalcev izvoznikov na Tajskem prejela od 17 proizvajalcev izvoznikov, od katerih jih je v OPP 9 izvažalo v Unijo.
It was decided to select a sample of 3 exporting producers whose combined exports represented 90 % of the total quantities exported to the Union by the cooperating exporting producers during the RIP.
Sklenjeno je bilo, da se izbere vzorec 3 proizvajalcev izvoznikov, katerih skupni izvoz v OPP je zajemal 90 % celotnega izvoza sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Unijo.
Given that only one reply has been received from an unrelated importer, sampling was not applied to unrelated importers.
Glede na to, da je izpolnjen vprašalnik predložil le en nepovezan uvoznik, se vzorčenje ni uporabljalo za nepovezane uvoznike.
In view of the large number of Union producers involved in these proceedings, the notice of initiation announced that the Commission had provisionally selected a sample of Union producers for the determination of injury in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Ker je v postopek vključenih veliko proizvajalcev Unije, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku navedeno, da je Komisija za ugotovitev škode v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe začasno izbrala vzorec proizvajalcev Unije.
That pre-selection had been made by using the information available to the Commission at initiation stage and was based on the producers’ sales volume, production volume and geographical location in the Union.
Ta predizbor je bil izveden na podlagi informacij, ki so bile Komisiji na voljo v začetni fazi, temeljil pa je na obsegu prodaje in proizvodnje ter zemljepisni legi proizvajalca v Uniji.
The proposed sample corresponds to the largest representative volume of production which could be reasonably investigated within the time available, representing 58 % of the total production of the Union industry.
Predlagani vzorec ustreza največjemu reprezentativnemu obsegu proizvodnje, ki ga je bilo mogoče v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati, tj. 58 % celotne proizvodnje industrije Unije.
In addition, the proposed sample is representative in terms of geographical location of the companies as it covers three different Member States.
Poleg tega je predlagani vzorec reprezentativen z vidika zemljepisne lege družb, saj zajema tri različne države članice.
Union producers have been consulted about the proposed sample on the date of publication of the notice of initiation.
Na dan objave obvestila o začetku so s proizvajalci Unije potekala posvetovanja v zvezi s predlaganim vzorcem.
Given that no additional producers came forward and no comments were received on the sample, the proposed sample has been confirmed.
Predlagani vzorec je bil potrjen, pri čemer se je upoštevalo, da se ni javil noben dodatni proizvajalec in da v zvezi z vzorcem niso bile prejete nobene pripombe.
Two interested parties claimed that the sample of Union producers has only been selected among applicants and that an effort should have been made to sample producers outside the group of applicants.
Dve od zainteresiranih strani sta trdili, da so bili v vzorec proizvajalcev Unije izbrani samo vložniki in da bi bilo treba vanj vključiti tudi proizvajalce zunaj skupine vložnikov.
However, all known Union producers, both applicants as well as non-applicants, have been invited to cooperate.
Vendar so bili k sodelovanju pozvani vsi znani proizvajalci Unije, tako vložniki kot nevložniki.
Ten Union producers, both applicants and non-applicants, have submitted sampling information.
Podatke o vzorčenju je predložilo deset proizvajalcev Unije, tako vložniki kot nevložniki.
As explained in recital 13, the selected sample corresponds to the largest representative volume of production which could be reasonably investigated within the time available, representing 58 % of the total production of the Union industry.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 13, izbrani vzorec ustreza največjemu reprezentativnemu obsegu proizvodnje, ki ga je bilo mogoče ustrezno preiskati v razpoložljivem času, in predstavlja 58 % celotne proizvodnje industrije Unije.
The Commission considers that the selected sample is representative in terms of geographical location, irrespective of whether the producers are applicants or not.
Komisija meni, da je izbrani vzorec reprezentativen v smislu geografske lokacije, ne glede na to, ali so proizvajalci vložniki ali ne.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a determination of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping, resulting injury and of the Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga in posledične škode ter za ugotovitev interesa Unije.
To this end, the Commission sent questionnaires to the exporting producers and Union producers selected in the sample and to the unrelated importer.
Komisija je zato poslala vprašalnike proizvajalcem izvoznikom in proizvajalcem Unije, vključenim v vzorec, ter nepovezanemu uvozniku.
Bonduelle Conserve International SAS, Renescure, France
Bonduelle Conserve International SAS, Renescure, Francija,
Compagnie Générale de Conserve France SA, Theix, France
Compagnie Générale de Conserve France SA, Theix, Francija,
Compagnie Générale de Conserve Hungary, Debrecen, Hungary
Compagnie Générale de Conserve Hungary, Debrecen, Madžarska,
The product concerned is sweetcorn (Zea mays var. saccharata) in kernels, prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen, currently falling within CN code ex20019030, and sweetcorn (Zea mays var. saccharata) in kernels prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar or acetic acid, not frozen, other than products of heading 2006, currently falling within CN code ex20058000, originating in Thailand.
Zadevni izdelek je sladka koruza (Zea mays var. saccharata) v zrnju, pripravljena ali konzervirana v kisu ali ocetni kislini, nezamrznjena, trenutno uvrščena pod oznako KN ex20019030, ter sladka koruza (Zea mays var. saccharata) v zrnju, pripravljena ali konzervirana drugače kot v kisu ali ocetni kislini, nezamrznjena, razen izdelkov iz tarifne številke 2006, trenutno uvrščena pod oznako KN ex20058000, s poreklom iz Tajske.
The investigation has shown that, despite differences in the preservations, the different types of the product concerned all share the same basic biological and chemical characteristics and are basically used for the same purposes.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo vse različne vrste zadevnega izdelka, kljub razlikam pri konzerviranju, enake osnovne biološke in kemijske lastnosti ter se dejansko uporabljajo za iste namene.
Two interested parties claimed that the CN codes for sweet corn do not only represent the product concerned, but include considerable quantities of canned babycorn which is not produced in the Union and which is not the like product.
Dve od zainteresiranih strani sta trdili, da oznake KN za sladko koruzo ne predstavljajo le zadevnega izdelka, temveč vključujejo znatne količine konzervirane mlade koruze, ki se ne proizvaja v Uniji in ni podobni izdelek.
They suggested that the Commission include babycorn it its data.
Menita, da je Komisija v svoje podatke morda vključila mlado koruzo.
However, the investigation focused exclusively on the product under measures, which excludes babycorn, by using corresponding TARIC codes as a basis for analysis.
Vendar je bila preiskava usmerjena izključno v izdelek, za katerega veljajo ukrepi in ki ne zajema mlade koruze, in sicer z uporabo ustreznih oznak TARIC kot podlago za analizo.
Therefore, the claim is rejected as factually incorrect.
Trditev se zavrne, ker gre za netočne podatke.