natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the party concerned fails to put the application in order within the time-limit prescribed, the Tribunal shall decide whether the non-compliance with these conditions renders the application to set aside formally inadmissible.
Na robu izvirnika zamudne sodbe se napravi zaznamek o sodbi, izdani na podlagi ugovora.
The same rules shall apply to the written observations provided for in this Article.
V skladu s členom 42 Statuta lahko tretji vloži ugovor zoper odločbo, ki je bila izdana v zadevi, pri kateri tretji ni bil udeležen, odločba pa posega v njegove pravice.
The Tribunal shall decide by way of a judgment which may not be set aside.
Ugovor se vloži v dveh mesecih od objave odločbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The original of this judgment shall be annexed to the original of the judgment by default.
Za ugovor tretjega se uporabljata člena 45 in 50;
A note of the judgment on the application to set aside shall be made in the margin of the original of the judgment by default.
poleg tega se v njem navedejo:
In accordance with Article 42 of the Statute, third-party proceedings may be brought against a decision rendered without the third party's having been heard, where the decision is prejudicial to his rights.
izpodbijana odločba;
The application must be submitted within two months of publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.
kako izpodbijana odločba posega v pravice tretjega, ki vlaga ugovor;
Articles 45 and 50 of these Rules shall apply to an application initiating third-party proceedings.
zakaj se tretji, ki vlaga ugovor, ni mogel udeležiti postopka pred Sodiščem za uslužbence.
In addition such an application shall:
Ugovor tretjega se vloži proti vsem strankam v postopku.
specify the decision contested;
Dodeli se sestavi, ki je izdala izpodbijano odločbo.
state how the contested decision is prejudicial to the rights of the third party;
Po vročitvi ugovora tretjega predsednik drugim strankam določi rok za predložitev pisnih stališč.
indicate the reasons for which the third party was unable to take part in the original case before the Tribunal.
Če ugovor tretjega ni v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 45(1), drugi do četrti pododstavek, člena 45(2), drugi pododstavek, ali člena 46, sodni tajnik tretjemu določi rok za dopolnitev.
The application initiating third-party proceedings must be made against all the parties to the original case.
Če tretji v tako določenem roku tega ne stori, Sodišče za uslužbence odloči, ali je zaradi nespoštovanja teh zahtev ugovor tretjega nedopusten iz formalnih razlogov.
It shall be assigned to the formation of the court which delivered the contested decision.
Izpodbijana odločba se ustrezno spremeni v delu, glede katerega se ugovoru tretjega ugodi.
After the application initiating third-party proceedings has been served, the President shall prescribe a time-limit within which the other parties may submit their written observations.
Izvirnik sodbe, izdane na podlagi ugovora tretjega, se priloži izvirniku izpodbijane odločbe.
If the application initiating third-party proceedings does not comply with the requirements set out in the second, third and fourth subparagraphs of Article 45(1), in the second subparagraph of Article 45(2), or in Article 46, the Registrar shall prescribe a time-limit within which the party concerned is to put that application in order.
Na robu izvirnika izpodbijane odločbe se naredi zaznamek o sodbi, izdani na podlagi ugovora tretjega.
If the party concerned fails to put the application in order within the time-limit prescribed, the Tribunal shall decide whether the non-compliance with these conditions renders the application initiating third-party proceedings formally inadmissible.
Če sta zoper isto odločbo Sodišča za uslužbence vložena pritožba pred Splošnim sodiščem in ugovor tretjega pred Sodiščem za uslužbence, lahko Sodišče za uslužbence po opredelitvi strank prekine postopek.
The contested decision shall be varied on the points on which the submissions of the third party are upheld.
Sodišče za uslužbence lahko na predlog tretjega, ki je vložil ugovor, odloži izvršitev izpodbijane odločbe.
The original of the judgment in the third-party proceedings shall be annexed to the original of the contested decision.
Uporabljajo se določbe iz oddelka 1 v poglavju 10 tega naslova.
A note of the judgment in the third-party proceedings shall be made in the margin of the original of the contested decision.
V skladu s členom 43 Statuta mora Sodišče za uslužbence v primeru nejasnosti pomena ali posledic odločbe na zahtevo stranke ali institucije, ki ima za to upravičen interes, dati razlago.
Where an appeal before the General Court and an application initiating third-party proceedings before the Tribunal contest the same decision of the Tribunal, the Tribunal may, after hearing the parties, stay the proceedings.
Zahteva za razlago se vloži v dveh letih od dneva razglasitve sodbe ali vročitve sklepa.
The Tribunal may, on application by the third party, order a stay of execution of the contested decision.
V zvezi z zahtevo za razlago se uporabljata člena 45 in 50;
The provisions of Chapter 10, Section 1, of this Title shall apply.
zadevna odločba;
In accordance with Article 43 of the Statute, if the meaning or scope of a decision is in doubt, the Tribunal shall construe it on application by any party or any institution establishing an interest therein.
besedilo, katerega razlaga se predlaga.
An application for interpretation must be made within two years after the date of delivery of the judgment or service of the order.
Zahteva za razlago se vloži proti vsem strankam, ki jih zadeva odločba, katere razlaga se predlaga.
Articles 45 and 50 shall apply to an application for interpretation.
Dodeli se sestavi, ki je sprejela odločbo, katere razlaga se predlaga.
specify the decision in question;
Sodišče za uslužbence odloči s sodbo po tem, ko strankam omogoči, da predložijo stališča.
indicate the passages of which interpretation is sought.
Izvirnik sodbe o razlagi se priloži izvirniku razložene odločbe.
The application for interpretation must be made against all the parties to the case in which the decision of which interpretation is sought was given.
Na robu izvirnika razložene odločbe se napravi zaznamek o sodbi o razlagi.
It shall be assigned to the formation of the court which gave the decision which is the subject of the application.
Če se pritožba na Splošno sodišče in zahteva za razlago pred Sodiščem za uslužbence nanašata na isto odločbo Sodišča za uslužbence, lahko Sodišče za uslužbence po opredelitvi strank prekine postopek.
The Tribunal shall give its decision by way of judgment after having given the parties an opportunity to submit their observations.
Oddelek 6
The original of the interpreting judgment shall be annexed to the original of the decision interpreted.
V skladu s členom 44 Statuta se lahko obnova postopka pred Sodiščem za uslužbence zahteva le, če se odkrije novo dejstvo odločilnega pomena, ki pred razglasitvijo ali sprejetjem odločbe Sodišču za uslužbence in stranki, ki zahteva obnovo, ni bilo znano.
A note of the interpreting judgment shall be made in the margin of the original of the decision interpreted.
Brez poseganja v rok desetih let iz člena 44, tretji odstavek, Statuta se predlog za obnovo postopka vloži najpozneje v treh mesecih od dneva, ko je predlagatelj izvedel za dejstva, na katerih predlog temelji.
Where an appeal before the General Court and an application for interpretation before the Tribunal concern the same decision of the Tribunal, the Tribunal may, after hearing the parties, stay the proceedings.
Za predlog za obnovo postopka se uporabljata člena 45 in 50;
Section 6
deli, v katerih se odločba izpodbija;
In accordance with Article 44 of the Statute, an application for revision of a decision of the Tribunal may be made only on discovery of a fact which is of such a nature as to be a decisive factor and which, before the decision was delivered or adopted, was unknown to the Tribunal and to the party claiming the revision.
dejstva, na katerih predlog temelji;
Without prejudice to the time-limit of 10 years prescribed in the third paragraph of Article 44 of the Statute, an application for revision shall be made within three months of the date on which the facts on which the application is founded came to the applicant's knowledge.
dokazni predlogi, ki izkazujejo obstoj dejstev, ki upravičujejo obnovo postopka, in to, da je bil spoštovan rok iz odstavka 1 tega člena.
Articles 45 and 50 shall apply to an application for revision.
Predlog za obnovo postopka se vloži proti vsem strankam v postopku, v katerem je bila izdana izpodbijana odločba.
indicate the points on which the decision is contested;
Dodeli se sestavi, ki je izdala izpodbijano odločbo.
set out the facts on which the application is based;
Sodišče za uslužbence lahko na podlagi pisnih stališč strank, ne da bi odločalo po vsebini, s sklepom odloči o dopustnosti predloga za obnovo postopka.
indicate the nature of the evidence to show that there are facts justifying revision, and that the time-limits laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article have been observed.
Če Sodišče za uslužbence odloči, da je predlog dopusten, se v nadaljevanju obravnava ustno, razen če Sodišče za uslužbence odloči drugače.
The application for revision must be made against all the parties to the case in which the contested decision was given.
Kadar Sodišče za uslužbence odloči, da je treba vložiti vloge, se postopek nadaljuje v skladu s členi 36 do 48, 56 do 85 in 90 do 114.
It shall be assigned to the formation of the court which gave the contested decision.
Če predlog za obnovo postopka ni v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 45(1), drugi do četrti pododstavek, člena 45(2), drugi pododstavek, ali člena 46, sodni tajnik zadevni stranki določi rok za dopolnitev.
Without prejudice to its decision on the merits, the Tribunal shall give its decision on the admissibility of the application in the form of an order, having regard to the parties' written observations.
Če zadevna stranka v tako določenem roku tega ne stori, Sodišče za uslužbence odloči, ali je zaradi nespoštovanja teh zahtev predlog nedopusten iz formalnih razlogov.
If the Tribunal declares the application admissible, the remainder of the procedure shall be oral, unless the Tribunal otherwise decides.
Enaka pravila se uporabljajo za pisna stališča in vloge iz tega člena.
Where the Tribunal decides that pleadings are to be lodged, the proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with Articles 36 to 48, 56 to 85 and 90 to 114.
Sodišče za uslužbence odloči s sodbo.
If the application for revision does not comply with the requirements set out in the second, third and fourth subparagraphs of Article 45(1), in the second subparagraph of Article 45(2), or in Article 46, the Registrar shall prescribe a time-limit within which the party concerned is to put that application in order.
Izvirnik sodbe, izdane v obnovljenem postopku, se priloži izvirniku izpodbijane odločbe.
If the party concerned fails to put the application in order within the time-limit prescribed, the Tribunal shall decide whether the non-compliance with these conditions renders the application for revision formally inadmissible.
Na robu izvirnika izpodbijane odločbe se naredi zaznamek o sodbi, izdani v obnovljenem postopku.
The same rules shall apply to the written observations and the pleadings provided for in this Article.
Če se pritožba pred Splošnim sodiščem in predlog za obnovo postopka pred Sodiščem za uslužbence nanašata na isto odločbo Sodišča za uslužbence, lahko Sodišče za uslužbence po opredelitvi strank postopek prekine.
The Tribunal shall give its decision by way of judgment.
Oddelek 7
The original of the revising judgment shall be annexed to the original of the decision revised.
Če Splošno sodišče razveljavi sodbo ali sklep Sodišča za uslužbence in na podlagi člena 13 Priloge I k Statutu vrne slednjemu zadevo v razsojanje, se postopek pred Sodiščem za uslužbence začne s sodbo, s katero je bila zadeva vrnjena v razsojanje.
A note of the revising judgment shall be made in the margin of the original of the decision revised.
Predsednik Sodišča za uslužbence dodeli zadevo sestavi, ki je sprejela razveljavljeno odločbo, ali drugi sestavi, kot sodnika poročevalca pa določi sodnika, ki v zadevi, v kateri je bila vložena pritožba, ni bil sodnik poročevalec.
Where an appeal before the General Court and an application for revision before the Tribunal concern the same decision of the Tribunal, the Tribunal may, after hearing the parties, stay the proceedings.
Če je razveljavljeno odločbo sprejel sodnik posameznik, predsednik Sodišča za uslužbence dodeli zadevo senatu treh sodnikov, katerega član ni navedeni sodnik.
Section 7
Tožeča stranka lahko v dveh mesecih od vročitve sodbe Splošnega sodišča vloži vlogo o pravnih vidikih, ki so upravičili razveljavitev in vrnitev zadeve v razsojanje.
Where the General Court sets aside a judgment or an order of the Tribunal and refers the case back to the Tribunal by virtue of Article 13 of Annex I to the Statute, the latter shall be seised of the case by the judgment so referring it.
Vloga tožeče stranke ali dopis Sodišča za uslužbence, s katerim je tožena stranka obveščena, da ta vloga ni bila vložena v določenem roku, se vroči toženi stranki.
The President of the Tribunal shall assign the case either to the formation of the court which gave the decision which has been set aside or to another formation of the court and shall designate as Judge-Rapporteur a Judge other than the Judge who fulfilled that function in the case which gave rise to the appeal.
Tožena stranka lahko vlogo vloži v mesecu, ki sledi vročitvi.
Where the decision set aside was given by a single Judge, the President of the Tribunal shall assign the case to a Chamber of three Judges of which that Judge is not a member.
Rok, ki je toženi stranki določen za vložitev te vloge, nikakor ne sme biti krajši od dveh mesecev od vročitve sodbe Splošnega sodišča.
Within two months from the service upon him of the judgment of the General Court the applicant may lodge written observations on the points of law which justified the setting aside of the judgment and the referral back.
Vloge tožeče in tožene stranke oziroma dopis Sodišča za uslužbence o tem, da ena ali nobena od strank ni vložila vloge, se sočasno vročijo intervenientu.
The applicant's written observations or a letter from the Tribunal informing the defendant that such observations have not been lodged within the time-limit prescribed shall be served on the defendant.
Intervenient lahko v mesecu, ki sledi tej vročitvi, vloži vlogo.
In the month following such service, the defendant may lodge written observations.
Če pisni del postopka pred Sodiščem za uslužbence v trenutku razglasitve sodbe, s katero je bila zadeva vrnjena v razsojanje, še ni bil končan, se z odstopanjem od odstavkov 1 do 3 na podlagi ukrepov procesnega vodstva, ki jih je sprejelo Sodišče za uslužbence, nadaljuje od trenutne faze postopka.
The time-limit allowed to the defendant for lodging those observations may in no case be less than two months from the service upon it of the judgment of the General Court.
Sodišče za uslužbence lahko, če okoliščine to upravičujejo, dovoli vložitev dodatnih vlog.
The written observations of the applicant and the defendant or a letter from the Tribunal indicating that one or both of the parties has failed to lodge written observations shall be served on the intervener at the same time.
Če vloga iz tega člena ni v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 45(1), drugi do četrti pododstavek, člena 45(2), drugi pododstavek, ali člena 46, sodni tajnik zadevni stranki določi rok za dopolnitev.
In the month following such service, the intervener may lodge written observations.
Če zadevna stranka v tako določenem roku tega ne stori, Sodišče za uslužbence odloči, ali je zaradi nespoštovanja teh zahtev vloga nedopustna iz formalnih razlogov.
By way of derogation from paragraphs 1 to 3, where the written part of the procedure before the Tribunal had not been completed when the judgment referring the case back to the Tribunal was delivered, it shall be resumed, at the stage which it had reached, by means of measures of organisation of procedure adopted by the Tribunal.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 6 lahko Sodišče za uslužbence s privolitvijo strank odloči, da bo odločilo brez obravnave.
The Tribunal may, if the circumstances so justify, allow supplementary written observations to be lodged.
Sodišče za uslužbence odloči tako o stroških postopkov pred njim kot tudi o stroških pritožbenega postopka pred Splošnim sodiščem.
If the written observations provided for in this Article do not comply with the requirements set out in the second, third and fourth subparagraphs of Article 45(1), in the second subparagraph of Article 45(2), or in Article 46, the Registrar shall prescribe a time-limit within which the party concerned is to put the written observations in order.
NASLOV III
If the party concerned fails to put the written observations in order within the time-limit prescribed, the Tribunal shall decide whether the non-compliance with these conditions renders the written observations formally inadmissible.
KONČNE DOLOČBE
By way of derogation from paragraph 6, the Tribunal may, with the agreement of the parties, decide to rule on the case without a hearing.
Sodišče za uslužbence lahko z ločenim aktom sprejme praktične določbe za izvajanje tega poslovnika.
The Tribunal shall decide on the costs relating to the proceedings instituted before it and to the proceedings on the appeal before the General Court.
S tem poslovnikom se nadomesti Poslovnik Sodišča za uslužbence z dne 25. julija 2007, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen 18. maja 2011 (Uradni list Evropske unije, L 162, 22.6.2011, str. 19).
TITLE 3
Ta poslovnik, ki je verodostojen v jezikih postopka, navedenih v Poslovniku Splošnega sodišča, se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
FINAL PROVISIONS
Veljati začne prvi dan tretjega meseca po objavi.
The Tribunal may, by a separate act, adopt rules for the implementation of these Rules.
V Luxembourgu, 21. maja 2014 Sodna tajnica
These Rules replace the Rules of Procedure of the Tribunal adopted on 25 July 2007, as last amended on 18 May 2011 (Official Journal of the European Union, L 162 of 22 June 2011, p. 19).
Predsednik
These Rules, which are authentic in the languages of the case referred to in the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
S. Van Raepenbusch
They shall enter into force on the first day of the third month following the date of their publication.
Kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen z Uredbo (EU, Euratom) št. 741/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. avgusta 2012 (UL L 228, 23.8.2012, str. 1).
Done at Luxembourg, 21 May 2014.
UL L 265, 29.9.2012, str. 1.
Registrar
UL L 225, 29.8.2007, str. 1, s popravki v UL L 69, 13.3.2008, str. 37, in v UL L 162, 22.6.2011, str. 20, s spremembami z dne 14. januarja 2009, objavljenimi v UL L 24, 28.1.2009, str. 10, z dne 17. marca 2010, objavljenimi v UL L 92, 13.4.2010, str. 17, in z dne 18. maja 2011, objavljenimi v UL L 162, 22.6.2011, str. 19.
S. Van Raepenbusch President
po potrebi dan obravnave,
As amended, most recently, by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 741/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 August 2012 (OJ L 228, 23.8.2012, p. 1).
Če ta poslovnik določa, da mora biti sklep obrazložen, sklep poleg zgoraj navedenega vsebuje:
In the event of a dispute, the customs officials or police may seal those papers and documents;
1.
they shall then be immediately forwarded to the Tribunal for inspection in the presence of the Registrar and of the person concerned;
Mandat sodnika začne teči z dnem, določenim za to v aktu o imenovanju.
Instructions to the Registrar of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal
Navodila sodnemu tajniku Sodišča za uslužbence evropske unije
Having regard to the Rules of Procedure adopted on 21 May 2014,
na podlagi Poslovnika, sprejetega 21. maja 2014,
and in particular Article 132 thereof,
in zlasti njegovega člena 132 –
has laid down the following
sprejema ta
The definitions adopted in Article 1 of the Rules of Procedure shall apply equally for the purposes of these Instructions.
Vse opredelitve pojmov iz člena 1 Poslovnika se uporabljajo enako za ta navodila.
Responsibilities and replacement of the Registrar
Pristojnosti in nadomeščanje sodnega tajnika
The responsibilities of the Registrar shall be those laid down in Article 20 of the Rules of Procedure.
Pristojnosti sodnega tajnika so določene v členu 20 Poslovnika.
The replacement of the Registrar shall take place in accordance with Articles 18 and 19 of those Rules.
Njegovo nadomeščanje se izvede v skladu s členoma 18 in 19 tega poslovnika.
All days other than Saturdays, Sundays and the official holidays on the list referred to in Article 25(2) of the Rules of Procedure shall be working days.
Delavniki so vsi dnevi razen sobot, nedelj in po zakonu dela prostih dni, navedenih na seznamu iz člena 25(2) Poslovnika.
The offices of the Registry shall be closed to the public on Friday afternoons during the judicial vacations provided for in Article 25(2) of the Rules of Procedure.
Med sodnimi počitnicami, določenimi v členu 25(2) Poslovnika, je sodno tajništvo za javnost zaprto ob petkih popoldne.
The offices of the Registry shall be open only to the representatives of the parties or to persons duly authorised by them, and to persons making an application for legal aid.
Vstop v sodno tajništvo je dovoljen le zastopnikom strank ali osebam, ki so jih te pravilno pooblastile, in osebam, ki vlagajo prošnjo za brezplačno pravno pomoč.
When the Registry is closed, procedural documents may be validly lodged with the janitor at the entrance to the Court of Justice of the European Union, rue du Fort Niedergrünewald, Luxembourg, at any time of the day or night.
Kadar je sodno tajništvo zaprto, se lahko procesni akti kadar koli podnevi ali ponoči veljavno vložijo pri vratarju pri vhodu v Sodišče Evropske unije na rue du Fort Niedergrünewald, Luxembourg.
Judgments and orders as well as all the procedural documents placed on the file in cases brought before the Tribunal shall be entered in the register in the order in which they are submitted, with the exception of those drawn up for the purposes of an amicable settlement within the meaning of Article 90 of the Rules of Procedure, as referred to in Article 6(4) of these Instructions.
V vpisnik se vpišejo sodbe in sklepi ter vsi procesni akti, ki se vložijo v spise v zadevah, predloženih Sodišču za uslužbence, po vrstnem redu vložitve, razen procesnih aktov, izdanih zaradi mirnega reševanja sporov v smislu člena 90 Poslovnika, kakor je navedeno v členu 6(4) teh navodil.
A note of the registration, including the registration number and the date of entry in the register, shall be made by the Registrar on the original of every procedural document or on the version deemed to be the original of that document in accordance with Article 3 of the Decision of the Tribunal of 20 September 2011 on the lodging and service of procedural documents by means of e-Curia (OJ C 289, p. 11) (‘the e-Curia Decision’), and, if a party so requests, on any copy submitted for the purpose.
Sodni tajnik naredi na izvirniku vsakega procesnega akta ali na različici, ki se v smislu člena 3 Odločbe Sodišča za uslužbence z dne 20. septembra 2011 o vlaganju in vročanju procesnih aktov prek aplikacije e-Curia (UL C 289, str. 11) (v nadaljevanju: odločba e-Curia) šteje za izvirnik tega akta, in na zahtevo strank tudi na prepisih, ki jih stranke v ta namen predložijo, zaznamek o vpisu v vpisnik, ki vključuje navedbo opravilne številke in dneva vpisa v vpisnik.
For the purposes of the application of the preceding paragraph, the following dates shall be taken into account, depending on the circumstances:
Za uporabo prejšnjega odstavka se, odvisno od primera, upoštevajo,
the date referred to in Article 5 of the e-Curia Decision, or
dan iz člena 5 odločbe e-Curia, ali