natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, in accordance with Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation, an adjustment is to be made to the normal value if the conditions set in that Article are met, and not to the export price as claimed by the applicant.
Vendar se v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe prilagoditev izračuna za normalno vrednost, če so pogoji iz tega člena izpolnjeni, in ne za izvozno ceno, kot je zahteval vložnik.
Furthermore, the investigation showed that no direct link could be established between the payment received by the applicant in respect of the product concerned when exported to the Union and import charges for the raw materials physically incorporated therein.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da ni nobene neposredne povezave med plačilom, ki ga vložnik prejme za zadevni izdelek, ko je izvožen v Unijo, ter uvoznimi dajatvami za surovine, ki so fizično zajete v njem.
The applicant also claimed the same adjustment under Article 2(10)(k).
Vložnik je zahteval enako prilagoditev tudi v skladu s členom 2(10)(k).
However, since it failed to demonstrate any link between the export tax rebate and the pricing of the exported product concerned, the claim could not be accepted.
Ker pa vložnik ni dokazal nobene povezave med znižanjem izvoznih dajatev in oblikovanjem cen za zadevni izvoženi izdelek, zahtevka ni mogoče sprejeti.
The claim for an allowance for export tax rebate under Article 2(10)(b) and (k) is therefore rejected.
Zahtevek za nadomestilo za znižanje izvoznih dajatev v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) in členom 2(10)(k) se zato zavrne.
The weighted average normal value of each type of the product concerned exported to the Union was compared with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned, as provided for in Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost vsake vrste zadevnega izdelka, izvoženega v Unijo, se je primerjala s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka, kakor je določeno v členu 2(11) in 2(12) osnovne uredbe.
On this basis, the weighted average dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, was found to be 3,6 %.
Na podlagi tega je tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, 3,6 %.
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether the circumstances on the basis of which the current dumping margin was based have changed and whether that change was of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je Komisija preučila, ali so se okoliščine, na katerih temelji veljavna stopnja dampinga, spremenile in ali je ta sprememba trajna.
In its request for a review, the applicant had referred to changes in the product range it commercialises which would have a direct impact on the cost of production thereof.
V zahtevku za pregled se je vložnik skliceval na spremembe obsega izdelkov, ki jih trži, ki lahko neposredno vplivajo na proizvodne stroške.
The investigation has confirmed that, due to a corporate restructuring, the applicant no longer produces and sells certain other products as compared to the original investigation period, and that this change has had an impact on the cost of production for the product concerned.
Preiskava je potrdila, da zaradi prestrukturiranja podjetja vložnik ne proizvaja in prodaja več določenih drugih izdelkov, kot je to počel v obdobju prvotne preiskave, in da je ta sprememba vplivala na stroške proizvodnje za zadevni izdelek.
AETMD has commented that the restructuring carried out by the applicant might not be of a lasting nature, as it could easily be reversed.
AETMD je pripomnil, da prestrukturiranje, ki ga je izvedel vložnik, morda ne bo trajno, saj se lahko zlahka prekliče.
It is indeed possible that the management of the applicant, if it so wishes, would be in a position to reverse the restructuring.
Dejansko je mogoče, da uprava vložnika, če tako želi, prekliče prestrukturiranje.
However, there is no evidence suggesting that the applicant’s decision to restructure and to streamline the commercialisation of the group’s products between the group’s companies would not be of a lasting nature.
Vendar ni bilo dokazov, ki bi nakazovali, da odločitev vložnika o prestrukturiranju in racionalizaciji trženja izdelkov skupine med družbami skupine ne bi bila trajne narave.
In addition, the restructuring already took place by 2009, which indicates that the new corporate structure is of a lasting nature.
Poleg tega je bilo prestrukturiranje izvedeno že do leta 2009, kar kaže, da je nova struktura podjetij trajne narave.
Following disclosure, AETMD reiterated its claim that the change on the basis of which the review was initiated could not be considered as of a lasting nature.
Po razkritju je AETMD ponovno zahteval, da spremembe, na podlagi katere se je začel pregled, ni mogoče šteti kot trajne.
More specifically, it questioned the impact on the cost of production due to the internal reorganisation within the group, claiming that costs within the group can simply be reallocated in order to lower the normal value.
Natančneje, podvomil je v vpliv na stroške proizvodnje zaradi notranje reorganizacije znotraj skupine in trdil, da se stroški v skupini lahko preprosto prerazporedijo, da se zniža normalna vrednost.
For this reason, the new cost of production could not be considered as being of a lasting nature.
Zato se za nove stroške proizvodnje ne more šteti, da so trajne narave.
AETMD also noted that the subsidiary responsible for production and sales of fresh products shares the same address as the applicant.
AETMD je opozoril tudi, da hčerinska družba, ki je odgovorna za proizvodnjo in prodajo svežih izdelkov, uporablja isti naslov kot vložnik.
AETMD claimed that this is another indication that the reorganisation is not profound and lasting.
AETMD je trdil, da je to še en dokaz, da reorganizacija ni temeljita in dolgoročna.
In response to AETMD’s claims set out in recital 44, the applicant stressed that the reorganisation also entailed an improved cost accounting system whereby bottlenecks were identified and resolved in order to optimise production and to reduce manufacturing costs.
V odgovor na zahtevo AETMD v uvodni izjavi 44 je vložnik poudaril, da ima reorganizacija za posledico tudi izboljšan sistem stroškovnega računovodstva, pri čemer so bila ugotovljena in odpravljena ozka grla, da se je izboljšala proizvodnja in so se zmanjšali proizvodni stroški.
The applicant also stressed that any reversal of the 2009 reorganisation at this stage would be a very complex process as the mother-company to the applicant, Agripure Holding PLC, is listed on the Thai Stock Exchange.
Vložnik je poudaril tudi, da bi bila kakršna koli razveljavitev reorganizacije iz leta 2009 na tej stopnji zelo zapleten proces, saj vložnikovo matično podjetje Agripure Holding PLC kotira na tajski borzi.
The risk for a potential reversal of the applicant’s reorganisation has already been addressed in recital 43.
Tveganje za morebitno razveljavitev reorganizacije vložnika je bilo že obravnavano v uvodni izjavi 43.
Moreover, for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the claims in the request for the initiation of this review, the Commission made a comparison of the cost of production for the product types exported to the Union during the original investigation (i.e. before the applicant’s reorganisation in 2009) and during the RIP.
Poleg tega je Komisija zaradi preverjanja točnosti trditev v zahtevku za začetek tega pregleda naredila primerjavo proizvodnih stroškov za vrste izdelkov, izvoženih v Unijo, med prvotno preiskavo (tj. pred vložnikovo reorganizacijo leta 2009) in med OPP.
That comparison confirmed that the manufacturing costs per unit have changed to a significant degree.
Ta primerjava je potrdila, da so se proizvodni stroški na enoto spremenili v pomembnem obsegu.
The change in manufacturing costs per unit identified goes beyond a simple reallocation of costs and is due to a real decrease in indirect costs of production such as manufacturing overheads and labour costs.
Ugotovljena sprememba v proizvodnih stroških na enoto je večja kot zgolj prerazporeditev stroškov in je posledica dejanskega zmanjšanja posrednih stroškov proizvodnje, kot so proizvodni stroški in stroški dela.
As to the question of the applicant and its subsidiary sharing the same administrative address, this is a common business practice.
Za vprašanje, da vložnik in njegovo hčerinsko podjetje delita isti naslov uprave, velja, da je to splošna poslovna praksa.
Moreover, during the verification visit to the applicant’s premises, the Commission noted that the production lines and storage of finished goods within the premises were dedicated to sweetcorn production; there was no visible trace of the production and storage of the fresh products sold by the subsidiary.
Poleg tega je Komisija med preveritvenim obiskom prostorov vložnika ugotovila, da so proizvodne linije in skladiščenje končnih izdelkov v prostorih, ki so bili namenjeni proizvodnji sladke koruze; ni bilo vidnih sledi proizvodnje in skladiščenja svežih izdelkov, ki jih prodaja hčerinsko podjetje.
Having regard to the arguments of AETMD and of the applicant, and having identified a de facto decrease in the cost of manufacturing per unit between the original investigation and the RIP, the argument put forward by AETMD has to be rejected.
Ob upoštevanju argumentov AETMD in vložnika ter ob ugotovitvi dejanskega zmanjšanja stroškov proizvodnje na enoto med prvotno preiskavo in OPP je treba zavrniti argument, ki ga je navedel AETMD.
AETMD has also submitted that the applicant planned to increase its production capacity during 2013 by some 40 %.
AETMD je predložil tudi, da je vložnik v letu 2013 načrtoval povečati svoje proizvodne zmogljivosti za približno 40 %.
According to AETMD, this fact would go against the applicant’s claim that the new, revised cost of production (which followed the restructuring) would be of a lasting nature.
Po mnenju AETMD je to dejstvo v nasprotju z vložnikovo trditvijo, da bodo novi, popravljeni proizvodni stroški (po prestrukturiranju) trajne narave.
The investigation indeed confirmed that the applicant is in the process of increasing its production capacity.
Preiskava je dejansko potrdila, da je vložnik v postopku povečanja svoje proizvodne zmogljivosti.
The impact of the increased capacity has been one of the factors on the basis of which it was concluded in the expiry review that there was a risk for continuation of dumping [6].
Učinek povečane zmogljivosti je bil eden od dejavnikov, na podlagi katerih je bilo med pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa ugotovljeno, da obstaja tveganje za nadaljevanje dampinga [6].
Following disclosure, AETMD reiterated the claim that the investment into new production capacity will necessarily have an effect on the cost of production and therefore, the prevailing cost of production against which the domestic prices were compared in this review (see recital 24) is not of a lasting nature.
Po razkritju je AETMD ponovno navedel, da bodo naložbe v novo proizvodno zmogljivost zagotovo vplivale na proizvodne stroške in zato trenutni stroški proizvodnje, s katerimi so se primerjale domače cene v tem pregledu (glej uvodno izjavo 24), niso trajne narave.
In particular, AETMD made a calculation based on available sources on the basis of which it concluded that the total costs would increase due to increased depreciation by some 10 % as compared to the current costs.
AETMD je zlasti naredil izračun na razpoložljivih virih, na podlagi katerih je ugotovil, da bi se celotni stroški zaradi povečane amortizacije povečali za približno 10 % v primerjavi s sedanjimi stroški.
The applicant did not contradict AETMD’s claim concerning increased depreciation costs per se, but stressed that these increased costs of depreciation are to be offset by increases in total revenues (through increased sales) and by decreases in other costs as a result of increased automation.
Vložnik ni nasprotoval trditvi AETMD v zvezi s povečanimi stroški amortizacije sami po sebi, vendar poudarja, da se ti povečani stroški amortizacije izravnajo s povečanjem skupnih prihodkov (s povečano prodajo) in zaradi zmanjšanja drugih stroškov, ki so posledica večje avtomatizacije.
As mentioned in recital 51, the applicant is indeed in the process of investing in new production facilities.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 51, je vložnik dejansko v postopku naložb v nove proizvodne zmogljivosti.
Investments in new facilities may entail increases of costs for depreciation.
Naložbe v nove zmogljivosti imajo lahko za posledico povečanje stroškov za amortizacijo.
On the other hand, and as the applicant pointed out in response to AETMD’s comment, new production facilities may also entail changes (as compared to existing production lines) such as the level of automation.
Na drugi strani pa je vložnik v odgovor na pripombo AETMD poudaril, da imajo nove proizvodne zmogljivosti lahko za posledico spremembe (v primerjavi z obstoječimi proizvodnimi linijami), npr. raven avtomatizacije.
These changes should have a direct decreasing effect on the labour and energy costs and could offset the increases for the cost of depreciation.
Te spremembe bi morale imeti neposreden zmanjševalni učinek na stroške za delo in energijo in bi lahko izravnale povečanje stroškov amortizacije.
On balance, it is concluded that the overall impact on the cost of production per unit produced cannot be measured until the new installations have been inaugurated and any additional costs reflected in the accounts.
Na splošno se je ugotovilo, da celotnega učinka na stroške proizvodnje na proizvedeno enoto ni mogoče meriti, dokler nove naprave ne bodo začele delovati in bodo vsi dodatni stroški prikazani v računovodskih izkazih.
Nevertheless, and having regard to the objective of the investment (increased efficiency and competitiveness, to reduce manufacturing costs per unit), it is expected that at least in the medium to long term there will be no significant increase in the cost of production per unit.
Kljub temu in ob upoštevanju cilja naložbe (povečanje učinkovitosti in konkurenčnosti, zmanjšanje proizvodnih stroškov na enoto) se pričakuje, da se stroški proizvodnje na enoto vsaj srednje- do dolgoročno ne bodo znatno povečali.
In such circumstances it is expected that the normal value will still be based on domestic prices as in this review.
V takšnih okoliščinah se pričakuje, da bo normalna vrednost še vedno temeljila na domačih cenah kot v tem pregledu.
The argument brought forward by AETMD must therefore be rejected.
Argument, ki ga je predložil AETMD, je zato treba zavrniti.
Following disclosure, AETMD also questioned the lasting nature of the new dumping margin.
Po razkritju je AETMD podvomil tudi v trajno naravo nove stopnje dampinga.
It argued that the basis of the export prices used for the calculation of the dumping margin were not representative.
Trdil je, da podlaga izvoznih cen, uporabljena za izračun stopnje dampinga, ni bila reprezentativna.
More specifically, it argued that:
Natančneje, trdil je, da
the number of tonnes exported during the RIP was too small to be considered representative; and
je bilo število ton, izvoženih v OPP, premajhno, da bi se obravnavale kot reprezentativne, in
with reference to recital 29, the fact that the export transactions of own-branded products made up almost half of all exports during the RIP, the export prices should be deemed unrepresentative.
s sklicevanjem na uvodno izjavo 29, da bi se zaradi dejstva, da so izvozne transakcije izdelkov za lastno blagovno znamko pomenile skoraj polovico vseh izvozov v OPP, za izvozne cene moralo šteti, da niso reprezentativne.
AETMD considered that, should the proposed decrease of measures enter into force, the major portion of exports to the Union are more likely to be of retailers’ brand carrying lower export prices [7].
AETMD meni, da če bo predlagano zmanjšanje ukrepov začelo veljati, bo večji del izvoza v Unijo verjetneje pod blagovno znamko trgovcev na drobno, ki imajo nižje izvozne cene [7].
Due to the fact that the quantities exported to the Union were not significant, the Commission itself ascertained that the applicant’s prices paid or payable for exports to the Union were representative by comparing them with the applicant’s prices paid or payable for exports to other third countries.
Zaradi dejstva, da količine, izvožene v Unijo, niso bile velike, je Komisija ugotovila, da so bile vložnikove cene, ki so bile plačane ali se plačujejo za izvoze v Unijo, reprezentativne, ko jih je primerjala z vložnikovimi cenami, ki so bile plačane ali se plačujejo za izvoze v druge tretje države.
On this basis, it was concluded that the prices charged to customers in the Union were consistent with those charged to customers in other export markets.
Na podlagi tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile cene, naložene potrošnikov v Uniji v skladu s tistimi, zaračunanimi strankam na drugih izvoznih trgih.
The existence of different market segments, the own-brand and the retailers’ brand, have been acknowledged during the course of earlier investigations [8].
Obstoj različnih tržnih segmentov, lastne blagovne znamke in blagovne znamke trgovcev na drobno je bil priznan v teku predhodnih preiskav [8].
It constitutes one important part of the definition of different product types within the scope of the product concerned.
Predstavlja pomemben del opredelitve različnih vrst izdelkov v okviru obsega zadevnega izdelka.
On this basis, exports of own-brand products have been compared with domestic sales of own-brand products and export sales of retailers’ brand have been compared with domestic sales of retailers’ brand.
Na podlagi tega se je izvoz izdelkov lastne blagovne znamke primerjal z domačo prodajo izdelkov lastne blagovne znamke in izvozna prodaja blagovne znamke trgovcev na drobno se je primerjala z domačo prodajo blagovne znamke trgovcev na drobno.
The claim by AETMD that future exports will mainly be constituted by retailers’ brand is speculative, not supported by evidence and as such is insufficient to put into question the representativity of the exports of own-brand products during the RIP.
Trditev AETMD, da bo prihodnji izvoz zlasti zajemal blagovno znamko trgovcev na drobno, je špekulativna, ne temelji na dokazih in kot taka ne zadošča, da bi se podvomilo v reprezentativnost izvoza izdelkov lastnih trgovskih znamk v OPP.
The claim by AETMD is therefore rejected.
Trditev AETMD se zato zavrne.
AETMD also claimed that the decrease of the duty to a lower level could lead to the risk for circumvention of the measures.
AETMD je trdil tudi, da bi zmanjšanje dajatve na nižjo raven lahko povzročilo tveganje za izogibanje ukrepom.
It is recalled that the duties in force are already differentiated between the Thai exporting producers.
Treba je opozoriti, da se že veljavne dajatve razlikujejo med tajskimi proizvajalci izvozniki.
Thus, the risk for circumvention (i.e. using the TARIC additional code with lower duties) has been present since the introduction of the original measures.
Zato je bilo tveganje za izogibanje ukrepom (tj. uporaba dodatne oznake TARIC z nižjimi dajatvami) prisotno od uvedbe prvotnih ukrepov.
The lower duty for one of these exporting producers does not per se increase the risk of circumvention from Thailand as a whole.
Nižja dajatev za enega od teh proizvajalcev izvoznikov sama po sebi ne povečuje tveganja za izogibanje ukrepom s Tajske kot celote.
Moreover, should information become available suggesting that the duties are undermined by way of circumvention, an investigation can be initiated as appropriate provided that conditions set in Article 13 of the basic Regulation are met.
Poleg tega, če bi bili na voljo podatki, ki kažejo, da so dajatve oslabljene zaradi izogibanja ukrepom, se preiskava lahko začne kot ustrezna, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 13 osnovne uredbe.
AETMD also stated that the applicant may have artificially increased the export prices to the Union by way of cross-compensation with parallel sales of other products at artificially low prices.
AETMD je navedel tudi, da lahko vložnik umetno poveča izvozne cene v Unijo prek navzkrižne kompenzacije z vzporedno prodajo drugih izdelkov po umetno nizkih cenah.
As indicated in recital 58, export prices to the Union of the product concerned were in line with those to third countries.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 58, so bile cene izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo v skladu s cenami izvoza v tretje države.
Thus, there are no indications that export prices to the Union were artificially high during the RIP, and the argument is therefore rejected.
Zato ni dokazov, da so bile med OPP cene izvoza v Unijo umetno visoke in ta argument se zato zavrne.
In light of the results of the investigation, the Commission considers it appropriate to amend the anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of the product concerned from River Kwai International Food Industry Co., Ltd.
V skladu z rezultati preiskave Komisija meni, da je primerno spremeniti protidampinško dajatev, ki se uporablja za uvoz zadevnega izdelka družbe River Kwai International Food Industry Co., Ltd.
Moreover, and upon request from the applicant, its address in Thailand is also changed.
Poleg tega in na zahtevo vložnika se spremeni tudi njegov naslov na Tajskem.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend an amendment to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 875/2013.
Zainteresirane strani so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in vidikih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo priporočiti spremembo Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 875/2013.
Following disclosure, the Thai government argued that the average duty rate for cooperating non-sampled exporters should also be revised in order to take account of the findings of this partial interim review.
Po razkritju je tajska vlada trdila, da je treba spremeniti tudi povprečno stopnjo dajatve za sodelujoče nevzorčene izvoznike, da se upoštevajo ugotovitve tega delnega vmesnega pregleda.
It should be noted that this claim goes beyond the limited scope of this review which aims only at adjusting the level of the existing anti-dumping duty rate for the applicant.
Opozoriti je treba, da ta trditev presega omejeni obseg tega pregleda, katerega cilj je le prilagoditev ravni obstoječe stopnje protidampinške dajatve za vložnika.
Any request to amend the level of the anti-dumping duty rates following an alleged change in circumstances should be presented pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Vsako zahtevo za spremembo stopenj protidampinške dajatve po domnevni spremembi okoliščin bi bilo treba predložiti v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, this claim has to be rejected,
Zato je treba to trditev zavrniti –
The entry concerning River Kwai International Food Industry Co., Ltd in the table of Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 875/2013 is hereby replaced by the following:
Vnos za družbo River Kwai International Food Industry Co., Ltd v preglednici iz člena 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 875/2013 se nadomesti:
Council Regulation (EC) No 954/2008 of 25 September 2008 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 682/2007 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels originating in Thailand (OJ L 260, 30.9.2008, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 954/2008 z dne 25. septembra 2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 682/2007 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih vrst pripravljene ali konzervirane sladke koruze v zrnju s poreklom iz Tajske (UL L 260, 30.9.2008, str. 1).