natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Directive should also be without prejudice to the power of national, regional and local authorities to provide, commission and finance services of general economic interest in accordance with Article 14 TFEU and Protocol No 26 on Services of General Interest annexed to the TFEU and to the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
Ta direktiva prav tako ne bi smela posegati v pristojnost nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih organov, da v skladu s členom 14 PDEU in Protokolom (št. 26) o storitvah splošnega pomena, ki je priložen PDEU in Pogodbi o Evropski uniji (PEU), opravljajo, naročajo in financirajo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
A contract should be deemed to be a public works contract only if its subject-matter specifically covers the execution of activities listed in Annex II, even if the contract covers the provision of other services necessary for the execution of such activities.
Javno naročilo bi se moralo šteti za javno naročilo gradenj le, če njegov predmet izrecno zajema izvedbo dejavnosti s seznama v Prilogi II, čeprav javno naročilo zajema tudi opravljanje drugih storitev, potrebnih za izvedbo teh dejavnosti.
Public service contracts, in particular in the sphere of property management services, may, in certain circumstances, include works.
Javna naročila storitev, zlasti na področju gospodarjenja z nepremičninami, lahko v nekaterih primerih vključujejo gradnje.
However, in so far as such works are incidental to the principal subject-matter of the contract, and are a possible consequence thereof or a complement thereto, the fact that such works are included in the contract does not justify the qualification of the public service contract as a public works contract.
Če so te gradnje priložnostne glede na osnovni predmet javnega naročila in so torej njegova morebitna posledica ali dopolnitev, pa se zaradi dejstva, da so te gradnje vključene v javno naročilo, javno naročilo storitev ne more opredeliti kot javno naročilo gradenj.
However, in view of the diversity of public works contracts, contracting authorities should be able to make provision for contracts for the design and execution of work to be awarded either separately or jointly.
Zaradi raznolikosti javnih naročil gradenj bi morali javni naročniki imeti možnost določiti, da se javna naročila projektiranja in izvedbe gradenj oddajo bodisi ločeno bodisi skupaj.
This Directive is not intended to prescribe either joint or separate contract awards.
Namen te direktive ni predpisati skupnega ali ločenega oddajanja javnih naročil.
The realisation of a work corresponding to the requirements specified by a contracting authority requires that the authority in question must have taken measures to define the type of the work or, at the very least, have had a decisive influence on its design.
Za izvedbo gradnje, ki ustreza zahtevam javnega naročnika, je potrebno, da je zadevni javni naročnik sprejel ukrepe za opredelitev vrste gradnje ali da je vsaj odločilno vplival na njeno projektiranje.
Whether the contractor realises all or part of the work by his own means or ensures their realisation by other means should not change the classification of the contract as a works contract, as long as the contractor assumes a direct or indirect obligation that is legally enforceable to ensure that the works will be realised.
Naročilo bi moralo biti uvrščeno med naročila gradnje, ne glede na to, ali izvajalec celotno gradnjo ali del gradnje izvede sam oziroma zagotovi, da se izvede kako drugače, če izvajalca neposredno ali posredno zavezuje pravno zavezujoča obveznost dokončanja gradnje.
The notion of ‘contracting authorities’ and in particular that of ‘bodies governed by public law’ have been examined repeatedly in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Sodišče Evropske unije je v svoji sodni praksi večkrat preučilo pojma „javni naročniki“ in zlasti „osebe javnega prava“.
To clarify that the scope of this Directive ratione personae should remain unaltered, it is appropriate to maintain the definitions on which the Court based itself and to incorporate a certain number of clarifications given by that case-law as a key to the understanding of the definitions themselves, without the intention of altering the understanding of the concepts as elaborated by the case-law.
V pojasnilo, da bi moralo področje uporabe te direktive, kar zadeva osebno veljavnost, ostati nespremenjeno, je primerno obdržati opredelitev, na katero se je oprlo Sodišče, in vključiti nekatera pojasnila iz navedene sodne prakse kot ključ za razumevanje opredelitev samih, pri čemer ni namen spreminjati razumevanje pojma, kakor je podrobno opredeljen v sodni praksi.
For that purpose, it should be clarified that a body which operates in normal market conditions, aims to make a profit, and bears the losses resulting from the exercise of its activity should not be considered as being a ‘body governed by public law’ since the needs in the general interest, that it has been set up to meet or been given the task of meeting, can be deemed to have an industrial or commercial character.
V ta namen bi bilo treba pojasniti, da se oseba, ki deluje v običajnih tržnih pogojih in si prizadeva za dobiček ter nosi izgube, ki izhajajo iz opravljanja njene dejavnosti, ne bi smela šteti za „osebo javnega prava“, saj se lahko šteje, da so potrebe splošnega interesa, za katerih izpolnjevanje je bila ustanovljena ali zadolžena, industrijske ali poslovne narave.
Similarly, the condition relating to the origin of the funding of the body considered, has also been examined in the case-law, which has clarified inter alia that being financed for ‘the most part’ means for more than half, and that such financing may include payments from users which are imposed, calculated and collected in accordance with rules of public law.
Podobno je bil v sodni praksi preučen tudi pogoj glede izvora financiranja zadevne osebe, s katero se je med drugim pojasnilo, da „pretežno“ financiranje pomeni več kot polovično in da so lahko del takega financiranja plačila uporabnikov, ki so določena, izračunana in prejeta v skladu s pravili javnega prava.
In the case of mixed contracts, the applicable rules should be determined with respect to the main subject of the contract where the different parts which constitute the contract are objectively not separable.
V primeru mešanih javnih naročil bi bilo treba veljavna pravila določiti glede na glavni predmet naročila, če so različni sestavni deli naročila objektivno neločljivi.
It should therefore be clarified how contracting authorities should determine whether the different parts are separable or not.
Zato bi bilo treba pojasniti, kako naj bi javni naročniki presodili, ali so različni deli ločljivi ali ne.
Such clarification should be based on the relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Tako pojasnilo bi moralo temeljiti na zadevni sodni praksi Sodišča Evropske unije.
The determination should be carried out on a case-by-case basis, in which the expressed or presumed intentions of the contracting authority to regard the various aspects making up a mixed contract as indivisible should not be sufficient, but should be supported by objective evidence capable of justifying them and of establishing the need to conclude a single contract.
Ločljivost ali neločljivost različnih delov bi se morala določiti za vsak primer posebej, pri čemer izraženi ali domnevni nameni javnega naročnika, da se različni vidiki, ki sestavljajo mešano javno naročilo, obravnavajo kot neločljivi, ne bi smeli zadostovati, temveč bi jih bilo treba podpreti z objektivnimi dokazi, ki bi te namene lahko upravičili in bi lahko potrdili potrebo po sklenitvi ene pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila.
Such a justified need to conclude a single contract could for instance be present in the case of the construction of one single building, a part of which is to be used directly by the contracting authority concerned and another part to be operated on a concessions basis, for instance to provide parking facilities to the public.
Taka upravičena potreba po sklenitvi ene pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila bi lahko bila denimo prisotna v primeru gradnje ene same stavbe, del katere bi neposredno uporabljal zadevni javni naročnik, z drugim delom pa se bi upravljalo na podlagi koncesije, na primer za zagotavljanje javnih parkirnih mest.
It should be clarified that the need to conclude a single contract may be due to reasons both of a technical nature and of an economic nature.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da se potreba po sklenitvi ene pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila lahko pojavi zaradi razlogov tehnične in gospodarske narave.
In the case of mixed contracts which can be separated, contracting authorities are always free to award separate contracts for the separate parts of the mixed contract, in which case the provisions applicable to each separate part should be determined exclusively with respect to the characteristics of that specific contract.
Pri mešanih javnih naročilih, ki jih je mogoče ločiti, imajo javni naročniki vedno možnost, da za posamezne dele mešanega javnega naročila oddajo ločena naročila; v tem primeru bi morale biti določbe, ki bi se uporabljale za vsak posamezni del, določene izključno na podlagi značilnosti zadevnega naročila.
On the other hand, where contracting authorities choose to include other elements in the procurement, whatever their value and whatever the legal regime the added elements would otherwise have been subject to, the main principle should be that, where a contract should be awarded pursuant to the provisions of this Directive, if awarded on its own, then this Directive should continue to apply to the entire mixed contract.
Če pa se javni naročniki odločijo v naročilo vključiti druge elemente – ne glede na njihovo vrednost in ne glede na pravno ureditev, ki bi sicer veljala za te dodane elemente –, bi moralo biti vodilno načelo naslednje: v primeru, da bi bilo treba naročilo, če bi se oddalo kot enotno, oddati na podlagi določb te direktive, bi se morala ta direktiva še naprej uporabljati za celotno mešano javno naročilo.
However, special provision should be made for mixed contracts involving defence or security aspects or parts not falling within the scope of the TFEU.
Vendar bi bilo treba predpisati posebne določbe za mešana javna naročila, ki vključujejo obrambne ali varnostne vidike oziroma dele, ki ne spadajo v področje uporabe PDEU.
In such cases, non-application of this Directive should be possible provided that the award of a single contract is justified for objective reasons and that the decision to award a single contract is not taken for the purpose of excluding contracts from the application of this Directive or of Directive 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].
V takih primerih bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se ta direktiva ne uporablja, a pod pogojem, da oddajo enotne pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila upravičujejo objektivni razlogi in da odločitev o oddaji enotne pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila ni sprejeta z namenom izključitve naročil iz uporabe te direktive ali Direktive 2009/81/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7].
It should be clarified that contracting authorities should not be prevented from choosing to apply this Directive to certain mixed contracts instead of applying Directive 2009/81/EC.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da javnim naročnikom ne bi smeli onemogočiti, da za nekatera mešana javna naročila izberejo uporabo te direktive namesto Direktive 2009/81/ES.
It should be clarified that the notion of ‘economic operators’ should be interpreted in a broad manner so as to include any persons and/or entities which offer the execution of works, the supply of products or the provision of services on the market, irrespective of the legal form under which they have chosen to operate.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da bi morali pojem „gospodarski subjekt“ razlagati dovolj široko, da bi zajemal katero koli osebo in/ali subjekt, ki na trgu ponuja izvedbo gradenj, dobavo blaga ali opravljanje storitev, ne glede na to, v kateri pravni obliki se ta oseba in/ali subjekt odloči delovati.
Thus, firms, branches, subsidiaries, partnerships, cooperative societies, limited companies, universities, public or private, and other forms of entities than natural persons should all fall within the notion of economic operator, whether or not they are ‘legal persons’ in all circumstances.
Pojem „gospodarski subjekt“ bi torej moral zajemati podjetja, podružnice, hčerinske družbe, partnerstva, zadruge, družbe z omejeno odgovornostjo, javne ali zasebne univerze in druge oblike subjektov, ki niso fizične osebe, ne glede na to, ali gre v vseh okoliščinah za „pravne osebe“ ali ne.
It should be clarified that groups of economic operators, including where they have come together in the form of a temporary association, may participate in award procedures without it being necessary for them to take on a specific legal form.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da skupine gospodarskih subjektov, tudi če obstajajo v obliki začasnih združenj, lahko sodelujejo v postopkih javnega naročanja, ne da bi za to morale prevzeti določeno pravno obliko.
To the extent this is necessary, for instance where joint and several liability is required, a specific form may be required when such groups are awarded the contract.
Če je to potrebno, se določena oblika lahko zahteva ob oddaji naročil takšnim skupinam, na primer v primeru, ko se zahteva solidarna odgovornost.
It should also be clarified that contracting authorities should be able to set out explicitly how groups of economic operators are to meet the requirements concerning economic and financial standing as set out in this Directive, or the criteria relating to technical and professional ability, which are required of economic operators participating on their own.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba tudi, da bi morali javnim naročnikom omogočiti, da izrecno določijo, kako naj bi skupine gospodarskih subjektov izpolnile zahteve v zvezi z ekonomskim in finančnim položajem iz te direktive ali pogoje glede tehnične in strokovne sposobnosti, ki jih morajo izpolniti gospodarski subjekti, ki sodelujejo samostojno.
The performance of contracts by groups of economic operators may necessitate setting conditions which are not imposed on individual participants.
Za izvajanje javnih naročil s strani skupin gospodarskih subjektov utegne biti potrebno določiti pogoje, ki jih posameznim udeležencem ni treba izpolnjevati.
Such conditions, which should be justified by objective reasons and be proportionate, could for instance include requiring the appointment of a joint representation or a lead partner for the purposes of the procurement procedure or requiring information on their constitution.
Takšni pogoji, ki bi jih morali upravičevati objektivni razlogi in bi morali biti sorazmerni, bi lahko na primer zajemali zahtevo po imenovanju skupnega predstavnika ali vodilnega partnerja za namene postopka javnega naročanja ali zahtevo po informacijah o njihovi sestavi.
Contracting authorities should make use of all possible means at their disposal under national law in order to prevent distortions in public procurement procedures stemming from conflicts of interest.
Javni naročniki bi morali uporabiti vsa razpoložljiva sredstva, ki jih imajo po nacionalnem pravu na voljo za preprečevanje izkrivljanj pri izvajanju postopkov javnega naročanja, ki izvirajo iz nasprotij interesov.
This could include procedures to identify, prevent and remedy conflicts of interests.
To bi lahko zajemalo postopke za preprečevanje, odkrivanje in odpravljanje nasprotij interesov.
Council Decision 94/800/EC [8] approved in particular the World Trade Organisation Agreement on Government Procurement (the ‘GPA’).
S Sklepom Sveta 94/800/ES [8] je bil odobren zlasti Sporazum Svetovne trgovinske organizacije o vladnih naročilih (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum GPA).
The aim of the GPA is to establish a multilateral framework of balanced rights and obligations relating to public contracts with a view to achieving the liberalisation and expansion of world trade.
Cilj Sporazuma GPA je vzpostaviti večstranski okvir uravnoteženih pravic in obveznosti glede javnih naročil, da bi dosegli liberalizacijo in rast svetovne trgovine.
For contracts covered by Annexes 1, 2, 4 and 5 and the General Notes to the European Union’s Appendix I to the GPA, as well as by other relevant international agreements by which the Union is bound, contracting authorities should fulfil the obligations under those agreements by applying this Directive to economic operators of third countries that are signatories to the agreements.
Pri naročilih, zajetih v prilogah 1, 2, 4 in 5 ter v splošnih pripombah k Dodatku I (v zvezi z Evropsko unijo) k Sporazumu GPA in drugih zadevnih mednarodnih sporazumih, ki zavezujejo Unijo, bi morali javni naročniki obveznosti iz teh sporazumov izpolnjevati tako, da bi to direktivo uporabljali za gospodarske subjekte tretjih držav, ki so podpisnice teh sporazumov.
The GPA applies to contracts above certain thresholds, set in the GPA and expressed as special drawing rights.
Sporazum GPA se uporablja za naročila nad mejnimi vrednostmi, določenimi v Sporazumu GPA in izraženimi kot posebne pravice črpanja.
The thresholds laid down by this Directive should be aligned to ensure that they correspond to the euro equivalents of the thresholds of the GPA.
Mejne vrednosti iz te direktive bi bilo treba uskladiti, da bodo ustrezale enakovrednim mejnim vrednostim iz Sporazuma GPA, izraženim v eurih.
Provision should also be made for periodic reviews of the thresholds expressed in euros so as to adjust them, by means of a purely mathematical operation, to possible variations in the value of the euro in relation to those special drawing rights.
Treba bi bilo tudi določiti redne revizije mejnih vrednosti, izraženih v eurih, da se z navadno matematično operacijo prilagodijo morebitnim spremembam vrednosti eura glede na te posebne pravice črpanja.
Apart from those periodic mathematical adjustments, an increase in the thresholds set in the GPA should be explored during the next round of negotiations thereof.
Poleg omenjenih rednih matematičnih prilagoditev bi bilo treba v naslednjem krogu pogajanj preučiti možnost zvišanja mejnih vrednosti iz Sporazuma GPA.
It should be clarified that, for the estimation of the value of a contract, all revenues have to be taken into account, whether received from the contracting authority or from third parties.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da se morajo za ocenitev vrednosti javnega naročila upoštevati vsi prihodki, ne glede na to, ali izvirajo od javnega naročnika ali od tretjih oseb.
It should also be clarified that, for the purpose of estimating the thresholds, the notion of similar supplies should be understood as products which are intended for identical or similar uses, such as supplies of a range of foods or of various items of office furniture.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba tudi, da naj bi za namen ocene mejnih vrednosti pojem podobnega blaga razumeli kot proizvode, ki so namenjeni isti ali podobni uporabi, kot na primer dobava različnih vrst živil ali raznih kosov pisarniškega pohištva.
Typically, an economic operator active in the field concerned would be likely to carry such supplies as part of his normal product range.
Običajno bi gospodarski subjekt, dejaven na zadevnem področju, tako blago verjetno dobavljal v okviru svojega normalnega nabora proizvodov.
For the purposes of estimating the value of a given procurement, it should be clarified that it should be allowed to base the estimation of the value on a subdivision of the procurement only where justified by objective reasons.
Za namene ocenjevanja vrednosti določenega javnega naročila bi bilo treba pojasniti, da lahko ocena vrednosti temelji na razdelitvi javnih naročil zgolj v primeru, ko to upravičujejo objektivni razlogi.
For instance, it could be justified to estimate contract values at the level of a separate operational unit of the contracting authority, such as for instance schools or kindergartens, provided that the unit in question is independently responsible for its procurement.
Lahko bi bilo na primer upravičeno, da se vrednosti javnih naročil ocenijo na ravni ločene organizacijske enote javnega naročnika, kot so na primer šole ali vrtci, če je zadevna enota samostojno odgovorna za svoje javno naročilo.
This can be assumed where the separate operational unit independently runs the procurement procedures and makes the buying decisions, has a separate budget line at its disposal for the procurements concerned, concludes the contract independently and finances it from a budget which it has at its disposal.
To je mogoče domnevati, kadar ločena organizacijska enota samostojno vodi postopke javnega naročanja in sprejema odločitve o nakupu, razpolaga z ločeno proračunsko vrstico za zadevna javna naročila ter samostojno sklene pogodbo o izvedbi javnega naročila, ki ga financira iz proračuna, s katerim razpolaga.
A subdivision is not justified where the contracting authority merely organises a procurement in a decentralised way.
Razdelitev ni upravičena, če javni naročnik naročanje zgolj decentralizirano organizira.
Public contracts that are awarded by contracting authorities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and that fall within the scope of those activities are covered by Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [9].
Javna naročila, ki jih oddajo javni naročniki iz vodnega, energetskega in prometnega sektorja ter sektorja poštnih storitev in zadevajo navedene dejavnosti, so zajeta v Direktivi 2014/25/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9].
However, contracts awarded by contracting authorities in the context of their operation of maritime, coastal or river transport services fall within the scope of this Directive.
Vendar pa naročila, ki jih javni naročniki oddajo v okviru svojih storitvenih dejavnosti v pomorskem, priobalnem ali rečnem prevozu, spadajo na področje uporabe te direktive.
Being addressed to Member States, this Directive does not apply to procurement carried out by international organisations on their own behalf and for their own account.
Glede na to, da je ta direktiva naslovljena na države članice, se ne uporablja za naročila, ki jih izvajajo mednarodne organizacije v svojem imenu in za svoj račun.
There is, however, a need to clarify to what extent this Directive should be applied to procurement governed by specific international rules.
Treba pa je pojasniti, v kakšnem obsegu bi bilo treba to direktivo uporabljati za javna naročila, ki jih urejajo posebni mednarodni predpisi.
The awarding of public contracts for certain audiovisual and radio media services by media providers should allow aspects of cultural or social significance to be taken into account, which renders the application of procurement rules inappropriate.
Pri oddaji javnih naročil za nekatere avdiovizualne in radijske medijske storitve, ki jih opravljajo ponudniki medijskih storitev, bi moralo biti dopuščeno, da se upoštevajo vidiki kulturnega ali družbenega pomena, zaradi katerih je uporaba pravil o javnem naročanju neustrezna.
For those reasons, an exception should therefore be made for public service contracts, awarded by the media service providers themselves, for the purchase, development, production or co-production of off-the-shelf programmes and other preparatory services, such as those relating to scripts or artistic performances necessary for the production of the programme.
Zato bi bilo treba uveljaviti izjemo za javna naročila storitev, ki jih oddajo sami ponudniki medijskih storitev, pri nakupu, pripravi, produkciji ali koprodukciji standardnih programov in drugih pripravljalnih storitev, kot so tiste v zvezi s scenariji ali umetniškimi uprizoritvami, ki so potrebne za pripravo programa.
It should also be clarified that that exclusion should apply equally to broadcast media services and on-demand services (non-linear services).
Treba bi bilo tudi pojasniti, da bi se morala ta izjema uporabljati tako za radiodifuzijske medijske storitve kot za storitve na zahtevo (nelinearne storitve).