natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The UK asked for this derogation in order to allow the SFE not only to conduct tests in the case of the initial issue of the SFI certificate but to extend the privileges to allowing the SFE to test the SFI for any additional type.
Združeno kraljestvo je za to odstopanje zaprosilo, da bi lahko izpraševalcem SFE ne le omogočilo izvajanje preizkusov pri prvi izdaji potrdila SFI, temveč tudi razširilo privilegije, kar bi izpraševalcem SFE omogočilo preizkušanje inštruktorjev SFI za dodatni tip.
It is necessary to allow SFE not only to conduct tests in the case of the initial issue of the SFI certificate but to extend the privileges to allowing the SFE to test the SFI for any additional type as otherwise it will impose an unnecessary burden on the industry due to the lack of qualified staff.
Izpraševalcem SFE je treba omogočiti ne le izvajanje preizkusov pri prvi izdaji potrdila SFI, temveč je treba tudi razširiti privilegije ter tako izpraševalcem SFE omogočiti preizkušanje inštruktorjev SFI za kateri koli dodatni tip, saj bo drugače pomanjkanje usposobljenega osebja pomenilo nepotrebno obremenitev za sektor.
The Agency agreed with the justification provided by the UK on the need to grant this derogation.
Agencija se je strinjala z utemeljitvijo, ki jo je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo glede potrebe po odobritvi tega odstopanja.
The UK justified the intended derogation by stating that there would be no detrimental effect on the level of protection caused by this extension of privileges.
Združeno kraljestvo je načrtovano odstopanje utemeljilo s trditvijo, da s to razširitvijo privilegijev ne bo nobenih škodljivih posledic za stopnjo zaščite.
Based on the review performed, the Agency agreed with the assessment of the UK that an equivalent level of protection is maintained by the intended derogation as Part-FCL already allows the SFE to test the SFI for the aircraft type included in the initial issue of the SFI certificate.
Na podlagi opravljenega pregleda se je Agencija strinjala z oceno Združenega kraljestva, da nameravano odstopanje ohranja enakovredno stopnjo zaščite, saj del FCL izpraševalcem SFE že omogoča, da inštruktorje SFI preverjajo za tip zrakoplova iz prve izdaje potrdila SFI.
The United Kingdom may derogate from FCL.910.SFI(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011, allow the SFE not only to conduct tests in the case of the initial issue of the SFI certificate but to extend the privileges to allowing the SFE to test the SFI for additional types.
Združeno kraljestvo lahko odstopa od določbe FCL.910.SFI(b) Uredbe (EU) št. 1178/2011, izpraševalcem SFE omogoči opravljanje preizkusov pri prvi izdaji potrdila SFI in razširi privilegije, kar bi izpraševalcem SFE omogočilo preizkušanje inštruktorjev SFI za dodatne tipe.
The privileges of the SFI may be extended to other FSTDs representing further types of the same of the same category of aircraft when the holder has:
Privilegiji inštruktorjev SFI se lahko razširijo na druge naprave FSTD, ki predstavljajo druge tipe iste kategorije zrakoplovov, če je imetnik:
satisfactorily completed the simulator content of the relevant type rating course, and
zadovoljivo opravil tisti del ustreznega tečaja usposabljanja za ustrezen rating za tip, ki zadeva simulator letenja, in
conducted on a complete type rating course at least 3 hours of flight instruction related to the duties of an SFI on the applicable type under the supervision and to the satisfaction of a TRE or SFE qualified for this purpose.
na celotnem tečaju za rating za tip vodil najmanj tri ure usposabljanja za letenje v zvezi z nalogami inštruktorja SFI na ustreznem tipu pod nadzorom za to usposobljenega izpraševalca TRE ali SFE, ki je bil zadovoljen z njegovim izvajanjem.
Derogation by the United Kingdom from Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 with respect to the privileges and conditions for the Synthetic Flight Instructor (SFI)
Odstopanje Združenega kraljestva od Uredbe (EU) št. 1178/2011 v zvezi s privilegiji in pogoji za inštruktorja za letenje na simulatorju (SFI)
Provision FCL.905.SFI Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 establishes the privileges of the Synthetic Flight Instructor (SFI) and does not allow the SFI to provide instruction to applicants for the SFI certificate.
Določba FCL.905.SFI iz Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 1178/2011 določa privilegije inštruktorja za letenje na simulatorju (SFI) in inštruktorju SFI ne omogoča, da usposablja kandidate za potrdilo SFI.
Part-FCL gives the privilege to provide this instruction only to holders of a Type Rating Instructor (TRI) certificate, provided that they have at least 3 years of experience as TRI (FCL905.TRI(b)).
Del FCL podeljuje privilegij tega usposabljanja samo imetnikom potrdila inštruktorja za rating za tip (TRI), če imajo vsaj tri leta izkušenj kot inštruktorji TRI (FCL905.TRI(b)).
By letter of 27 November 2012, the Government of the United Kingdom (UK) notified the Commission and EASA of their intention to derogate from this provision of Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 (the Aircrew Regulation), on the basis of Article 14(6) of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008.
Z dopisom z dne 27. novembra 2012 je vlada Združenega kraljestva Komisijo in agencijo EASA uradno obvestila o svoji nameri, da na podlagi člena 14(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008 (osnovna uredba) odstopi od te določbe Uredbe (EU) št. 1178/2011 (uredba o letalskem osebju).
The UK proposed to grant holders of an SFI certificate the privilege to provide instruction for applicants for an SFI certificate without meeting the requirement to have at least 3 years of experience as TRI.
Združeno kraljestvo je predlagalo, da bi se imetnikom potrdila SFI podelil privilegij za usposabljanje kandidatov za potrdilo SFI brez izpolnjene zahteve po vsaj treh letih izkušenj kot inštruktor TRI.
EVALUATION OF THE REQUEST
OCENA ZAHTEVKA
The UK informed that they interpreted JAR-FCL in the past as allowing SFIs to act as tutors on SFI courses after having conducted a specific tutor course followed by an assessment of competence.
Združeno kraljestvo je poročalo, da so predpise JAR-FCL v preteklosti razlagali tako, da so inštruktorjem SFI omogočili poučevanje na tečajih za SFI po opravljenem posebnem tečaju za poučevanje, ki mu je sledila ocena usposobljenosti.
The UK further described that with the implementation of Part-FCL and the introduction of a more specific wording the privilege to teach applicants for an SFI certificate is granted only to Type Rating Instructors (TRIs) with 3 years of experience as TRIs.
Združeno kraljestvo je nadalje opisalo, da je z izvajanjem dela FCL in uvedbo natančnejšega besedišča privilegij za poučevanje kandidatov za potrdilo SFI odobren samo inštruktorjem za rating za tip (TRI) s tremi leti izkušenj kot inštruktorji TRI.
In the UK many SFI certified by the UK and working in the role of teaching applicants for an SFI certificate cannot comply with the requirement to become a TRI with 3 years of experience.
V Združenem kraljestvu številni imetniki potrdila SFI, ki ga je podelilo Združeno kraljestvo, ki poučujejo kandidate za potrdilo SFI, ne morejo izpolniti zahteve, da postanejo inštruktorji TRI s tremi leti izkušenj.
They will therefore be unable to continue to act as tutors in SFI courses.
Zato ne bodo mogli več poučevati na tečajih SFI.
The UK further specified that many of the current SFIs would be unable to fulfil the TRI requirements for medical reasons.
Združeno kraljestvo je nadalje navedlo, da številni od sedanjih inštruktorjev SFI ne bi mogli izpolniti zahtev za inštruktorja TRI iz zdravstvenih razlogov.
The UK concluded, based on an assessment of the actual situation, that there is an insufficient number of TRIs to teach a sufficient number of applicants for an SFI certificate and to meet the industry’s training needs.
Združeno kraljestvo je na podlagi ocene dejanskega položaja sklenilo, da ni dovolj inštruktorjev TRI, ki bi lahko usposobili ustrezno število kandidatov za potrdilo SFI in bi zadostili potrebam sektorja po usposabljanju.
As a result, there will be a shortage of qualified instructors to provide this training which would cause a serious disruption to the training of pilots, particular in the business/corporate aircraft domain.
Zato bo premalo usposobljenih inštruktorjev, ki bi lahko nudili to usposabljanje, zaradi tega pa bi lahko prišlo do resnih motenj pri usposabljanju pilotov, zlasti na področju poslovnih letal.
It is therefore necessary to grant the privilege to the SFI that do not fulfil the requirement of having at least 3 years of experience as TRI, to provide instruction for the SFI applicants.
Zato je treba odobriti privilegij inštruktorjem SFI, ki ne izpolnjujejo zahteve glede vsaj treh let izkušenj kot inštruktorji TRI, da usposabljajo kandidate za SFI.
The Agency agreed with the justification provided by the UK on the need for this derogation.
Agencija se je strinjala z utemeljitvijo, ki jo je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo glede potrebe po tem odstopanju.
In addition, the UK identified an inconsistency in Part-FCL as the Synthetic Flight Examiner (SFE), who must hold an SFI certificate, will have the privilege to conduct assessments of competence for the issue, revalidation or renewal of an SFI certificate but, at the same time, will not be allowed to instruct these SFIs.
Poleg tega je Združeno kraljestvo ugotovilo nedoslednost v delu FCL, saj bo imel izpraševalec praktične usposobljenosti na simulatorju (SFE), ki mora imeti potrdilo SFI, privilegij za izvajanje ocenjevanja usposobljenosti za izdajo, podaljšanje veljavnosti ali obnovo potrdila SFI, hkrati pa teh inštruktorjev SFI ne bo smel poučevati.
The fact that an SFE, being also an SFI, cannot teach a pilot to become an SFI but may examine the SFI is identified as an inconsistency in Part-FCL, because all examiners under the Part-FCL system have the privilege to instruct for the certificates, ratings and licences for which he/she is authorised to conduct examinations.
Dejstvo, da izpraševalec SFE, ki je tudi inštruktor SFI, ne more poučevati pilota, da bi le-ta postal inštruktor SFI, inštruktorje SFI pa lahko preverja, je opredeljeno kot nedoslednost v delu FCL, ker imajo vsi izpraševalci na podlagi sistema dela FCL privilegij, da poučujejo za potrdila, ratinge in licence, za katera so pooblaščeni za opravljanje preverjanj.
Part-FCL reflects the JAR-FCL system where the instruction of applicants for an SFI certificate was supposed to be only undertaken by a TRI.
Del FCL odraža sistem JAR-FCL, pri katerem naj bi usposabljanje kandidatov za potrdilo SFI izvajali samo inštruktorji TRI.
Having reviewed the proposals on how the UK intends to further qualify the SFI for such task, the Agency agreed with the assessment of the UK that an equivalent level of protection to that attained by the application of Part-FCL is achieved by the intended derogation, specifically with the additional training and checking requirements suggested by the UK.
Po pregledu predlogov o tem, kako namerava Združeno kraljestvo nadalje usposobiti inštruktorje SFI za takšno nalogo, se je Agencija strinjala z oceno Združenega kraljestva, da nameravano odstopanje ohranja stopnjo zaščite, enakovredno stopnji, doseženi z uporabo dela FCL, zlasti z dodatnimi zahtevami glede usposabljanja in preverjanja, ki jih je predlagalo Združeno kraljestvo.
It should be highlighted however, that the UK foresees this specific tutor course also for TRIs wishing to provide such training.
Treba pa je poudariti, da Združeno kraljestvo predvideva izvajanje tega posebnega tečaja za inštruktorje tudi za inštruktorje TRI, ki bi želeli izvajati takšno usposabljanje.
As Part-FCL already provides this privilege for the TRI wishing to instruct for an SFI certificate if he/she fulfils the 3-year experience requirement such a specific tutor course for the TRI is not required.
Ker del FCL inštruktorjem TRI, ki izpolnjujejo zahtevo glede triletnih izkušenj in bi želeli poučevati za potrdilo SFI, ta privilegij že podeljuje, se za inštruktorje TRI takšen poseben tečaj za inštruktorje ne zahteva.
These courses should therefore only be provided to SFIs.
Te tečaje je torej treba zagotoviti samo inštruktorjem SFI.
The United Kingdom may, by derogation from FCL.905.SFI grant the privilege to the SFIs that do not fulfil the requirement of having at least 3 years of experience as TRI, to provide instruction for the SFI applicants.
Združeno kraljestvo lahko z odstopanjem od določbe FCL.905.SFI odobri privilegij inštruktorjem SFI, ki ne izpolnjujejo zahteve glede vsaj treh let izkušenj kot inštruktorji TRI, da usposabljajo kandidate za SFI.
Such SFIs shall have at least 3 years of experience of instruction as an SFI, shall complete a specific 2-day SFI tutor course provided by an SFI tutor and shall pass an assessment of competence.
Takšni inštruktorji SFI imajo vsaj tri leta izkušenj s poučevanjem kot inštruktorji SFI, imajo opravljen poseben dvodnevni tečaj za inštruktorje SFI, ki ga izvaja inštruktor SFI, in imajo opravljeno oceno usposobljenosti.
All Member States may apply this derogation provided that the conditions attached are met.
To odstopanje lahko uporabijo vse države članice, če so izpolnjeni navedeni pogoji.
Derogation by the United Kingdom from Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 with respect to revalidation and renewal of an Instrument Rating (IR)
Odstopanje Združenega kraljestva od Uredbe (EU) št. 1178/2011 v zvezi s podaljšanjem veljavnosti in obnovo ratingov za instrumentalno letenje (IR)
Provision FCL.625(c) and (d) of Annex I (Part-FCL) to Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 reads:
Določba FCL.625(c) in (d) Priloge I (dela FCL) k Uredbi (EU) št. 1178/2011 navaja:
If the IR has not been revalidated or renewed within the preceding 7 years, the holder will be required to pass again the IR theoretical knowledge examination and skill test.’
Če rating IR ni bil podaljšan ali obnovljen v zadnjih sedmih letih, imetnik znova opravi preizkus teoretičnega znanja in preizkus praktične usposobljenosti za rating IR.“
By letter of 18 March 2013, the Government of the United Kingdom (UK) notified the Commission and EASA of their intention to derogate from this provision of Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 on the basis of Article 14(6) of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008.
Z dopisom z dne 18. marca 2013 je vlada Združenega kraljestva Komisijo in agencijo EASA uradno obvestila o svoji nameri, da na podlagi člena 14(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008 odstopi od te določbe Uredbe (EU) št. 1178/2011.
It is necessary to allow the holders of licences issued in accordance with Part-FCL with the ICAO compliant IR held on a 3rd country licence to maintain their privileges without the need of re-taking the theoretical knowledge examinations.
Imetnikom licenc, izdanih v skladu z delom FCL, ki imajo rating IR, skladen s standardi ICAO, iz licence, ki jo je izdala tretja država, je treba omogočiti, da ohranijo svoje privilegije, ne da bi morali ponovno opravljati preizkuse teoretičnega znanja.
The Aircrew Regulation does not address this situation, which creates an unnecessary burden on licence holders.
Uredba o letalskem osebju ne obravnava te situacije, ki predstavlja nepotrebno obremenitev za imetnike licence.
The UK believes that the requirements of FCL.625(d) were created for the case where a licence holder ceases to fly under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) for 7 years.
Združeno kraljestvo meni, da so bile zahteve določbe FCL.625(d) oblikovane za primer, ko imetnik licence za sedem let preneha z letenjem v skladu s pravili instrumentalnega letenja (IFR).
The rule does not take into account the possibility that the licence holder may have been flying under IFR using an IR held on a 3rd country licence during the 7 year period which has been renewed during that period and which is therefore valid.
To pravilo ne upošteva možnosti, da je imetnik licence v tem sedemletnem obdobju morda letel v skladu s pravili IFR z ratingom IR iz licence, ki jo je izdala tretja država, ki je bila v tem obdobju obnovljena in je torej veljavna.
The Agency, having reviewed the derogation request, agreed with the UK that it is disproportionate to require a pilot who has a current, or recently lapsed, ICAO Annex 1 compliant IR issued by a third country, to re-take the theoretical knowledge examinations needed to renew a European IR that has lapsed by more than 7 years; i.e. it is not appropriate to apply the same requirements to a pilot with recent IFR experience as it would be applied to a pilot who has not flown under IFR for more than 7 years.
Agencija se je po pregledu zahteve po odstopanju strinjala z Združenim kraljestvom, da je nesorazmerno, da se od pilota, ki ima obstoječ rating IR, skladen s Prilogo I k standardom ICAO, ki ga je izdala tretja država, ali pa mu je le-ta pred kratkim potekel, zahteva ponovno opravljanje preizkusov teoretičnega znanja, potrebnih za obnovo evropskega ratinga IR, ki je potekel pred več kot sedmimi leti; tj. uporaba istih zahtev za pilota, ki ima nedavne izkušnje s pravili IFR in pilota, ki po pravilih IFR ni letel že več kot sedem let, ni primerna.
The Agency agrees with the reasoning provided by the UK.
Agencija se strinja z razlago, ki jo je podalo Združeno kraljestvo.
The rule does not take into account the possibility that the licence holder may have been flying under IFR using an IR held on a 3rd country licence during the 7-year period which has been renewed during that period and which is therefore valid.
To pravilo ne upošteva možnosti, da je imetnik licence v tem sedemletnem obdobju morda letel v skladu s pravili IFR z ratingom IR iz licence, ki jo je izdala tretja država, ki je bila v tem obdobju obnovljena in je torej veljavna.
The intended derogation would concern holders of licences in accordance with Part-FCL that include the ICAO compliant IR.
Nameravano odstopanje bi se nanašalo na imetnike licenc v skladu z delom FCL, ki vključujejo rating IR, skladen s standardi ICAO.
If such pilots after a certain time stop to fly on that licence but continue to fly on an ICAO based third country licence that includes an IR and would request then to renew their IR on the European licence they would only have to fulfil the revalidation criteria contained in FCL.625(b) based on the current and valid third country IR.
Če takšni piloti po določenem času prenehajo leteti s to licenco, še vedno pa letijo z licenco, ki temelji na standardih ICAO, ki jo je izdala tretja država in vključuje rating IR, nato pa bi zaprosili za obnovo svojega ratinga IR na evropski licenci, bi morali izpolniti samo merila za podaljšanje veljavnosti iz določbe FCL.625(b) na podlagi obstoječega in veljavnega ratinga IR tretje države.
This means that the rating holder must pass the proficiency check, but will not be required to undergo training or to re-take the theoretical knowledge examinations.
To pomeni, da mora imetnik ratinga opraviti preverjanje strokovnosti, ne bo pa mu treba opraviti usposabljanja ali ponovno opravljati preizkusov teoretičnega znanja.
In the case of a pilot who held a third country IR that is not any longer valid but has been revalidated or renewed within the preceding 7 years the rating holder shall comply with the renewal requirements in FCL.625(c), but will also not be required to re-take the theoretical knowledge examinations.
V primeru pilota, ki je imel rating IR tretje države, ki ni več veljaven, je pa bila podaljšana njegova veljavnost ali pa je bil obnovljen v predhodnih sedmih letih, mora imetnik ratinga izpolnjevati zahteve glede obnove iz določbe FCL.625(c), prav tako pa mu ne bo treba ponovno opravljati preizkusov teoretičnega znanja.
The Agency considers that this provides a level of safety equivalent to that provided by Part-FCL.
Agencija meni, da to zagotavlja stopnjo zaščite, enakovredno tisti iz dela FCL.
The United Kingdom may, by derogation from Provision FCL.625(c) and (d) of Annex I (Part-FCL) to Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 allow the holders of licences issued in accordance with Part-FCL to maintain their privileges in relation to an IR held on 3rd country licence without the need of re-taking the theoretical knowledge examinations.
Združeno kraljestvo lahko z odstopanjem od določbe FCL.625(c) in (d) Priloge I (del FCL) k Uredbi (EU) št. 1178/2011 imetnikom licenc, izdanih v skladu z delom FCL omogoči, da ohranijo svoje privilegije v zvezi z ratingom IR iz licence, ki jo je izdala tretja država, ne da bi jim bilo treba ponovno opravljati preizkuse teoretičnega znanja.
This derogation applies to holders of licences issued in accordance with Part-FCL provided that an IR held on 3rd country licence is ICAO compliant.
To odstopanje se uporablja za imetnike licenc, izdanih v skladu z delom FCL, če je rating IR iz licence, ki jo je izdala tretja država, skladen s standardi ICAO.
Derogation by Sweden from the Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 [1]with respect to the existing provisions regarding the issuance of certificates of airworthiness for imported aircraft
Odstopanje Švedske od Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 748/2012 [1]v zvezi z veljavnimi določbami o izdaji spričeval o plovnosti za uvožen zrakoplov
In accordance with point 21.A.174(b)3(ii) of Annex I (Part-21) to Regulation (EU) No 748/2012, each application for a certificate of airworthiness, for an aircraft imported from a third country, shall include a statement by the competent authority of the State where the aircraft is or was registered, reflecting the airworthiness status of the aircraft on its register at the time of transfer.
V skladu s točko 21A.174(b)3(ii) Priloge I (del 21) k Uredbi (EU) št. 748/2012 morajo vloge za spričevalo o plovnosti pri zrakoplovih, uvoženih iz tretje države, vključevati izjavo pristojnega organa države, v kateri je zrakoplov registriran ali je bil registriran, o statusu plovnosti zrakoplova v njegovem registru ob predaji.
By letter of 24 January 2011, the Swedish Transport Agency notified the Commission and EASA of their intention to derogate from the provisions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1702/2003 [2] (repealed by Regulation (EU) No 748/2012) and to waive the requirement to include such a statement.2.
Z dopisom z dne 24. januarja 2011 je švedska agencija za promet Komisijo in agencijo EASA uradno obvestila o svoji nameri, da odstopi od določb Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1702/2003 [2] (razveljavljene z Uredbo (EU) št. 748/2012) in opusti zahtevo po vključitvi takšne izjave.2.
Sweden has identified a need to derogate from this rule, because in some cases such a statement is not available and cannot be obtained.
Švedska je ugotovila, da mora odstopiti od tega predpisa, ker v nekaterih primerih takšna izjava ni na voljo in je ni mogoče pridobiti.
The intent of requiring the statement by the competent authority of the State where the aircraft is, or was, registered, reflecting the airworthiness status of the aircraft on its register at time of transfer when an aircraft is imported into an EASA state is to enable the importing State to verify that the aircraft conforms to a type design approved under an EASA type-certificate, that any supplemental type-certificate, change or repair had been approved in accordance with Annex I (Part-21) to Regulation (EU) No 748/2012, and that the applicable airworthiness directives had been implemented.
Namen zahteve po izjavi pristojnega organa države, v kateri je zrakoplov registriran ali je bil registriran, o statusu plovnosti zrakoplova v njegovem registru ob predaji, ko je zrakoplov uvožen v državo EASA, je omogočiti državi uvoznici, da preveri, ali je zrakoplov v skladu s projektom tipa, odobrenim po certifikatu tipa EASA, ali so bili dodatni certifikat tipa, sprememba ali popravilo odobreni v skladu s Prilogo I (delom 21) k Uredbi (EU) št. 748/2012 in ali so bile izvedene ustrezne plovnostne zahteve.