natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Third, whether or not the sales of a blend of biodiesel with mineral diesel fall under the same general category of products, Article 2(6)(b) of the basic Regulation states, as already mentioned in recital 80 above, that such sales should be made in the ordinary course of trade.
Tretjič, ne glede na to, ali se prodaja mešanice biodizla in mineralnega dizla uvršča v isto splošno kategorijo izdelkov, je v členu 2(6)(b) osnovne uredbe določeno, da bi bilo treba takšno prodajo izvajati v običajnem poteku trgovine, kot je že bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 80.
Given that the domestic sales of biodiesel are not in the ordinary course of trade, the sales of the blend of biodiesel with mineral diesel is not, mutatis mutandis, considered to be in the ordinary course of trade.
Ker domača prodaja biodizla ni v običajnem poteku trgovine, se tudi za prodajo mešanice biodizla in mineralnega dizla na podoben način ne šteje, da je v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Therefore, and for the reasons explained above, 15 % profit is a reasonable amount that can be achieved by a relatively new, capital-intensive industry in Indonesia.
Na podlagi tega in zgoraj navedenih razlogov je 15-odstotni dobiček razumen znesek, ki ga lahko doseže sorazmerno nova, kapitalsko intenzivna industrija v Indoneziji.
The argument of the Government of Indonesia regarding a duplicative effect cannot be accepted since a cost adjustments under Article 2(5) and the reasonable profit under Article 2(6)(c) are two clearly distinct issues.
Trditve vlade Indonezije, ki se sklicuje na dvojni učinek, ni mogoče sprejeti, ker sta prilagoditev stroškov na podlagi člena 2(5) in razumni dobiček iz člena 2(6)(c) očitno dva različna vidika.
Recital 65 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Uvodna izjava 65 začasne uredbe se potrdi.
One party claimed that since the HPE price for CPO is inclusive of international transportation costs and since the purpose of the adjustment of the domestic price of CPO to the level of the international price of CPO is to arrive at an undistorted price of domestic CPO, the HPE price for CPO should be adjusted downwards to exclude transportation costs.
Ena stran je trdila, da bi bilo treba ceno HPE prilagoditi navzdol, da se izključijo stroški prevoza, ker cena HPE vključuje mednarodne stroške prevoza, namen prilagoditve domače cene surovega palmovega olja na raven mednarodne cene surovega palmovega olja pa je določitev domače cene surovega palmovega olja, ki ne bi bila izkrivljena.
That claim must be rejected.
To trditev je treba zavrniti.
The Commission was considering a number of alternatives for the selection of a most suitable price which should be used as an international reference price.
Komisija je obravnavala številne možnosti za izbiro najustreznejše cene, ki naj bi se uporabila kot mednarodna referenčna cena.
It should be recalled that the Indonesian authorities themselves use the HPE price as a benchmark to calculate the monthly level of export duties.
Treba je opozoriti, da ceno HPE uporabljajo tudi indonezijski organi kot referenčno vrednost za izračun mesečne stopnje izvoznih davkov.
The HPE price as defined by the Indonesian authorities was therefore considered the most appropriate international reference price to be used as a benchmark for establishing the level of distortion of the costs of production of biodiesel in Indonesia.
Cena HPE, kakor jo opredeljujejo indonezijski organi, se je zato štela kot najprimernejša mednarodna referenčna cena, ki jo je treba uporabiti kot referenčno vrednost za določitev stopnje izkrivljanja stroškov proizvodnje biodizla v Indoneziji.
Two parties submitted that the Commission failed to take into account that they manufacture biodiesel from feedstock which is different than CPO, i.e. Palm Fatty Acid Distillate (‘PFAD’), Refined Palm Oil (‘RPO’) or Refined Palm Stearin (‘RST’).
Dve strani sta navedli, da Komisija ni upoštevala, da proizvajata biodizel iz surovine, ki se razlikuje od surovega palmovega olja, tj. destilata maščobnih kislin palmovega olja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PFAD), rafiniranega palmovega olja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: RPO) ali rafiniranega palmovega stearina (v nadaljnjem besedilu: RST).
By failing to take into account the parties’ usage of the actual raw material in their production of biodiesel, the CPO adjustment (as described in recital 70) was applied on the incorrect raw material used and has therefore lead to an incorrect level of the constructed normal value.
Ker ni bila upoštevana raba dejanske surovine, ki sta jo strani uporabljali pri svoji proizvodnji biodizla, se je prilagoditev za surovo palmovo olje (kakor je opisana v uvodni izjavi 70) uporabljala za napačno surovino in je zato privedla do nepravilne stopnje konstruirane normalne vrednosti.
It has to be underlined that the Commission only replaced the cost of CPO purchased, from related and unrelated suppliers, for the production of biodiesel.
Poudariti je treba, da je Komisija samo nadomestila strošek surovega palmovega olja za proizvodnjo biodizla, ki je bilo kupljeno od povezanih in nepovezanih dobaviteljev.
As regards by-products such as PFAD, RPO and RST which result from the processing of purchased CPO and which are also further processed to produce biodiesel, no adjustments were made.
V zvezi s stranskimi proizvodi, kot so destilati maščobnih kislin palmovega olja, rafinirano palmovo olje in rafiniran palmov stearin, ki so rezultat obdelave kupljenega surovega palmovega olja in ki so sami nadalje obdelani z namenom proizvodnje biodizla, ni bilo opravljenih nobenih prilagoditev.
Three parties claimed that the Commission failed to recognise that their purchase of CPO from related companies should be treated equally to the in-house production and therefore no adjustment pursuant to Article 2(5) should apply (as explained in recital 70 above).
Tri strani so trdile, da Komisija ni priznala, da bi bilo treba njihov nakup surovega palmovega olja od povezanih družb obravnavati enako kot lastno proizvodnjo, zato v skladu s členom 2(5) ne bi smele veljati nobene prilagoditve (kakor je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 70 zgoraj).
The parties claim that transactions within the group were realised at arm’s length and should therefore not be adjusted and replaced by an international price.
Stranke trdijo, da so bile transakcije znotraj skupine opravljene po tržni ceni, zato ne bi smele biti prilagojene, tržnih cen pa ne bi smela nadomestiti mednarodna cena.
In addition, one exporting producer claimed that the constructed normal value should be calculated on a monthly basis during the IP.
Poleg tega je en proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da bi bilo treba konstruirano normalno vrednost v OP izračunati na mesečni osnovi.
As the internal transfer price cannot be considered reliable it is the Commission’s standard practice to verify whether transactions between related parties are indeed made at arm’s length.
Standardna praksa Komisije je, da preveri, ali so transakcije med povezanimi stranmi dejansko opravljene po tržni ceni, ker notranje transferne cene ni mogoče šteti za zanesljivo.
In order to so do, the Commission compares the price between related companies to the underlying market price.
Da bi to lahko storila, Komisija primerja cene med povezanimi družbami s temeljno tržno ceno.
Since the underlying domestic market price is distorted the Commission cannot make such verification.
Ker je temeljna cena na domačem trgu izkrivljena, Komisija takega preverjanja ne more opraviti.
Therefore, the Commission has to replace such an unreliable price with a reasonable price that would be applicable under arm’s length in normal market conditions.
Zato mora Komisija ceno, na katero se ni mogoče opreti, nadomestiti z razumno ceno, ki bi se uporabljala kot tržna cena v običajnih tržnih razmerah.
In this case, the international price.
V tem primeru je to mednarodna cena.
With regard to the claim for monthly calculations for the constructed normal value, the information provided and verified did not contain sufficiently detailed information to allow such a calculation.
Informacije, ki so bile predložene in preverjene v zvezi z zahtevkom za mesečni izračun konstruirane normalne vrednosti, niso vsebovale dovolj podrobnih podatkov, da bi omogočile tak izračun.
Both claims were therefore rejected.
Oba zahtevka sta bila zato zavrnjena.
The Union Industry claimed that the cost of the own produced CPO within the same legal entity should also be adjusted under Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation as it is also affected by the distortion which resulted from the DET.
Industrija Unije je trdila, da bi bilo treba strošek lastne proizvodnje iz surovega palmovega olja iste pravne osebe v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe prav tako prilagoditi, saj tudi nanj vpliva izkrivljanje, ki je rezultat sistema diferenciranih izvoznih davkov.
While the raw materials are being passed along the biodiesel production process at various stages of refinery/processing, the costs of those production stages can be treated as reliable since they are being realised within the same legal entity and the issue of unreliable transfer pricing as described above does not occur.
Ko surovine prehajajo različne faze rafiniranja/predelave v procesu proizvodnje biodizla, se lahko stroški teh proizvodnih faz obravnavajo kot zanesljivi, saj so realizirani znotraj iste pravne osebe, vprašanje nezanesljivih transfernih cen, kakor je opisano zgoraj, pa pri tem ne nastopi.
One exporting producer claimed that the Commission should have deducted so called price allowances from the constructed normal value.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi morala Komisija od konstruirane normalne vrednosti odšteti tako imenovane cenovne popravke.
That claim cannot be accepted.
Te trditve ni mogoče sprejeti.
The constructed normal value was constructed on the basis of costs.
Konstruirana normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana na podlagi stroškov.
It would therefore be inappropriate to make any allowances on the basis of price considerations.
Zato ne bi bilo primerno, da bi bili na podlagi cenovnih razlogov opravljeni kakršni koli popravki.
One party questioned the establishment of the export price, claiming that both the hedging gains and losses should be taken into account and alleging an inconsistent accounting treatment of biodiesel hedging gains and losses.
Ena stran je izrazila dvom glede določitve izvozne cene, pri čemer je navedla, da bi bilo treba upoštevati dobičke in izgube, ki izhajajo iz zavarovanja pred tveganji, in trdila, da se dobički in izgube, ki izhajajo iz zavarovanja pred tveganji, v računovodenju pri poslih z biodizlom ne obravnavajo dosledno.
The claim that both the hedging gains and losses should be taken into account must be rejected.
Trditev, da bi bilo treba upoštevati dobičke in izgube, ki izhajajo iz zavarovanja pred tveganji, je treba zavrniti.
Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation clearly provides that the export price shall be the price actually paid or payable for the product when sold for export, regardless of any separate — albeit related — gain or loss linked to hedging practices.
Člen 2(8) osnovne uredbe jasno določa, da je izvozna cena tista cena, ki se je dejansko plačala ali se plačuje za izdelek, ko se ta izvozi, ne glede na kakršne koli ločene – čeprav povezane – dobičke ali izgube, povezane s prakso zavarovanja pred tveganji.
Therefore, the methodology in recitals 66 and 67 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato se metodologija iz uvodnih izjav 66 in 67 začasne uredbe potrdi.
The Commission acknowledges that an inconsistent accounting treatment of the biodiesel hedging gains and losses of one party occurred at the provisional stage.
Komisija priznava, da je ena stran pri poslih z biodizlom v začasni fazi nedosledno računovodsko obravnavala dobičke in izgube, ki izhajajo iz zavarovanja pred tveganji.
This claim is accepted and the necessary corrections have been made.
Ta trditev se sprejme, ustrezni popravki pa so že bili opravljeni.
In relation to recital 68 of the provisional Regulation, one party claimed that the 5 % profit margin used for related trading companies located inside the Union results in an excessive return on capital and overstates the profit that is usually incurred on sales of biodiesel by unrelated traders.
V zvezi z uvodno izjavo 68 začasne uredbe je ena stran trdila, da je zaradi 5-odstotne stopnje dobička, ki se uporablja za povezane trgovske družbe s sedežem v Uniji, donosnost kapitala prevelika in da je dobiček, ki ga nepovezani trgovci običajno ustvarijo s prodajo biodizla, precenjen.
It claims that a typical return on capital corresponds to a profit margin of 1,3-1,8 %.
Trdi, da običajna donosnost kapitala ustreza stopnji dobička med 1,3 % in 1,8 %.
Given the absence of cooperation by unrelated importers and given the fact that trading companies are service businesses without significant capital investments rendering the return on capital allegation above as irrelevant, the Commission rejects the above claim and considers 5 % profit margin to be reasonable in this case.
Glede na nesodelovanje nepovezanih uvoznikov in glede na to, da so trgovske družbe storitvene družbe brez pomembnih kapitalskih naložb, zaradi česar je zgornja trditev v zvezi z donosnostjo kapitala nerelevantna, Komisija zavrača navedeno trditev in meni, da je 5-odstotna stopnja dobička v tem primeru razumna.
Recital 68 of the provisional Regulation is therefore confirmed.
Uvodna izjava 68 začasne uredbe se zato potrdi.
In relation to recital 69 of the provisional Regulation, one party claimed that the premium for double-counting biodiesel should be added to the export price, given that this is a mere implementation of the Italian law.
V zvezi z uvodno izjavo 69 začasne uredbe je ena stran navedla, da bi bilo treba v izvozno ceno vključiti premijo za dvojno štetje biodizla, saj se s tem zgolj izvaja italijanska zakonodaja.
Even if the Commission would accept this claim and add the premiums to the export price, the premiums would have to be deducted again under Article 2(10)(k) in order to compare the export price with the same normal value with due account taken for differences that affect price comparability.
Tudi če bi Komisija sprejela to trditev in vključila premije v izvozno ceno, bi bilo treba premije ponovno odšteti v skladu s členom 2(10)(k), da bi se izvozna cena primerjala z enako normalno vrednostjo, pri čemer bi se ustrezno upoštevale razlike, ki vplivajo na primerljivost cen.
Given that in Indonesia there is no premium for double counting biodiesel, the higher export price in Italy would therefore not be directly comparable.
Ker se v Indoneziji ne zaračunavajo premije za dvojno štetje biodizla, višja izvozna cena v Italiji ni neposredno primerljiva.
That claim is therefore rejected and recital 69 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ta trditev se zato zavrne, uvodna izjava 69 začasne uredbe pa se potrdi.
Following the definitive disclosure that party repeated its claim.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ta stran ponovila svojo trditev.
No substantial additional arguments were however brought forward as to alter the Commission’s assessment.
Vendar pa niso bile predložene nobene bistvene dodatne utemeljitve, na podlagi katerih bi se ocena Komisije spremenila.
Therefore recital 69 of the provisional Regulation remains confirmed.
Zato se uvodna izjava 69 začasne uredbe potrdi.
After the final disclosure, several exporting producers drew the Commission’s attention to alleged clerical errors in the dumping calculations.
Po končnem razkritju je več proizvajalcev izvoznikov Komisijo opozorilo na domnevne stvarne napake pri izračunu dampinga.
Those claims were examined and, where warranted, corrections were made to the calculations.
Trditve so bile proučene, izračuni pa so bili popravljeni, kadar je bilo to upravičeno.
In the absence of any comments regarding comparison, recitals 70 to 75 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s primerjavo ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 70 do 75 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Taking into account the adjustments made to the normal value and to the export price as set out in recitals above, and in the absence of any further comments, the definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Ob upoštevanju prilagoditev normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene iz zgoraj navedenih uvodnih izjav in ker ni bilo dodatnih pripomb, so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
The provisional Regulation, in recitals 80 to 82, defined the Union industry and confirmed that three companies were excluded from the definition of the Union industry due to their reliance on imports from the countries concerned, that is to say that they imported significantly more biodiesel from the countries concerned than they produced themselves.
V uvodnih izjavah od 80 do 82 začasne uredbe je opredeljen pojem industrije Unije in potrjeno, da so bile tri družbe izključene iz opredelitve industrije Unije zaradi njihove odvisnosti od uvoza iz zadevnih držav, kar pomeni, da so iz zadevnih držav uvažale bistveno več biodizla, kot so ga same proizvedle.
Two further companies were excluded from the definition of the Union industry as they had not produced biodiesel during the investigation period.
Iz opredelitve industrije Unije sta bili izključeni še dve družbi, ker nista proizvajali biodizla v obdobju preiskave.
Comments were received after publication of the provisional Regulation that other companies should be excluded from the definition of the Union industry for importing biodiesel from the countries concerned, and also because of their relationship to exporting producers in Argentina and Indonesia, thereby shielding themselves from the negative consequences of dumping.
Po objavi začasne uredbe so bile prejete pripombe, da bi bilo treba iz opredelitve industrije Unije izključiti še druge družbe, ki so uvažale biodizel iz zadevnih držav in ki so bile poleg tega povezane s proizvajalci izvozniki iz Argentine in Indonezije, s čimer so se zaščitile pred negativnimi posledicami dampinga.
Those comments are rejected.
Te pripombe se zavrnejo.
After analysing the claim regarding relationships between exporting producers and the Union industry, it was found that a holding company held shares in both an Argentinian exporting producer and a Union producer.
Po analizi trditev glede razmerja med proizvajalci izvozniki in industrijo Unije je bilo ugotovljeno, da je imel holding tako delnice argentinskega proizvajalca izvoznika kot tudi proizvajalca Unije.
Firstly, those companies were found to be openly competing with each other for the same customers on the Union market, thereby showing that their relationship did not have any impact on the business practices of either the Argentinian exporting producer or the Union producer.
Prvič, ugotovljeno je bilo, da te družbe med seboj odkrito tekmujejo za iste stranke na trgu Unije, kar kaže, da ta povezava ni imela nobenega učinka na poslovne prakse argentinskega proizvajalca izvoznika ali proizvajalca Unije.
Following definitive disclosure, an interested party requested information as to the Commission’s conclusion that Argentinian exporters and the Union industry were competing for the same clients on the European market.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena zainteresirana stran zahtevala informacije o sklepu Komisije, iz katerega izhaja, da argentinski izvozniki in industrija Unije konkurirajo za iste stranke na evropskem trgu.
The investigation of Union producers, and the investigation of Argentinian exporters, showed this fact and no evidence has been provided to substantiate any allegation that Argentinian exporters and Union producers had agreed not to compete in sales of biodiesel to end users.
To dejstvo je bilo ugotovljeno na podlagi preiskave proizvajalcev Unije in preiskave argentinskih izvoznikov, predložen pa ni bil noben dokaz, ki bi utemeljil trditev, da so se argentinski izvozniki in proizvajalci Unije dogovorili o tem, da v prodaji biodizla končnim uporabnikom ne bodo konkurirali.
The number of end users is relatively small and composed in the main of the large oil refineries, which purchase both from Union producers and importers.
Število končnih uporabnikov je razmeroma majhno, v glavnem pa končne uporabnike predstavljajo velike naftne rafinerije, ki kupujejo od proizvajalcev in uvoznikov Unije.
Secondly, the main centre of interest of the Union producer referred to in recital 108 above was found to be within the Union, in particular their production and related sales activities as well as research activities.
Drugič, ugotovljeno je bilo, da je glavno središče interesov proizvajalca Unije iz zgoraj navedene uvodne izjave 108 znotraj Unije, zlasti na področju proizvodnje in povezanih prodajnih dejavnosti ter raziskovalnih dejavnosti.
As a result, the conclusion was that the relationship was not a reason to exclude this company from the definition of the Union industry under Article 4(1)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da povezava ne utemeljuje izključitve zadevne družbe iz opredelitve industrije Unije v skladu s členom 4(1)(a) osnovne uredbe.
The fact that some of the Union industry has been importing biodiesel from the countries concerned is in itself not enough to change the definition of the Union industry.
Dejstvo, da del industrije Unije uvaža biodizel iz zadevnih držav, samo po sebi ni dovolj velik razlog za spremembo opredelitve industrije Unije.
As explained in the provisional Regulation, the imports of the Union industry from the countries concerned were made in self-defence.
Kot je pojasnjeno v začasni uredbi, je industrija Unije iz zadevnih držav izvažala zaradi samozaščite.
Furthermore, it was found that the centre of interest of some Union producers who imported from the countries concerned remained in the Union — these companies were producing more in volume terms than they were importing and their research functions were carried out in the Union.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so nekateri proizvajalci Unije, ki so uvažali iz zadevnih držav, središče interesov ohranili v Uniji – obseg proizvodnje teh podjetij je bil večji od obsega njihovega uvoza, raziskovalne dejavnosti pa so družbe izvajale v Uniji.
One interested party alleged that the Union industry should also contain those companies that were purchasing biodiesel and blending it with mineral diesel, as these blends were also product concerned.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da bi morala industrija Unije vključevati tudi tiste družbe, ki so kupovale biodizel in ga mešale z mineralnim dizlom, ker so bile tudi te mešanice zadevni izdelek.
The product concerned is biodiesel, in pure form or as included in a blend Therefore the producers of the product concerned are producers of biodiesel and not the companies that mix the biodiesel with the mineral diesel.
Zadevni izdelek je biodizel v čisti obliki ali kot je uporabljen v mešanici. Zato so proizvajalci zadevnega izdelka proizvajalci biodizla in ne družbe, ki proizvajajo mešanico biodizla in mineralnega dizla.
The definition of the Union industry as set out in recitals 80 to 82 of the provisional Regulation is therefore confirmed, along with the volume of production for the IP as set out in recital 83 of the provisional Regulation.
Opredelitev industrije Unije iz uvodnih izjav 80 do 82 začasne uredbe se zato potrdi. Prav tako se potrdi obseg proizvodnje v OP iz uvodne izjave 83 začasne uredbe.
After provisional disclosure the Union industry made a small correction to their sales for 2009, thereby adjusting the Union consumption for that year.
Po začasnem razkritju je industrija Unije naredila manjši popravek v zvezi s svojo prodajo za leto 2009 in s tem prilagodila potrošnjo Unije za navedeno leto.
This correction does not change the trend or the conclusions drawn from the data in the provisional Regulation.
Ta popravek ne spremeni gibanja ali sklepov, oblikovanih na podlagi podatkov iz začasne uredbe.
Table 1 is corrected below.
Spodaj je popravljena preglednica 1.
In the absence of any comments, recitals 84 to 86 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker v zvezi s tem ni bilo pripomb, se uvodne izjave 84 do 86 začasne uredbe potrdijo.