natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 9
Države članice zagotovijo, da kršitev konkurenčnega prava, ugotovljena s pravnomočno odločbo nacionalnega organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, ali pritožbenega sodišča, velja za neovrgljivo dokazano v primeru odškodninske tožbe, vložene pred nacionalnimi sodišči na podlagi člena 101 ali 102 PDEU ali nacionalnega konkurenčnega prava.
Effect of national decisions
Države članice zagotovijo, da se lahko pravnomočna odločba iz odstavka 1, izdana v drugi državi članici, v skladu z njihovim zadevnim nacionalnim pravom predloži pred nacionalnimi sodišči vsaj kot dokaz prima facie, da je bilo kršeno konkurenčno pravo, po potrebi pa se lahko oceni skupaj z drugimi dokazi, ki jih predložita stranki.
Member States shall ensure that an infringement of competition law found by a final decision of a national competition authority or by a review court is deemed to be irrefutably established for the purposes of an action for damages brought before their national courts under Article 101 or 102 TFEU or under national competition law.
Ta člen ne posega v pravice in obveznosti nacionalnih sodišč iz člena 267 PDEU.
Member States shall ensure that where a final decision referred to in paragraph 1 is taken in another Member State, that final decision may, in accordance with national law, be presented before their national courts as at least prima facie evidence that an infringement of competition law has occurred and, as appropriate, may be assessed along with any other evidence adduced by the parties.
Člen 10
This Article is without prejudice to the rights and obligations of national courts under Article 267 TFEU.
Zastaralni roki
Article 10
Države članice v skladu s tem členom določijo pravila o zastaralnih rokih za vložitev odškodninskih tožb.
Limitation periods
Ta pravila določijo, kdaj začne teči zastaralni rok, njegov tek in okoliščine, v katerih se zastaralni rok prekine ali pretrga.
Member States shall, in accordance with this Article, lay down rules applicable to limitation periods for bringing actions for damages.
Zastaralni rok ne začne teči, dokler kršitev konkurenčnega prava ne preneha in tožnik ni seznanjen ali se od njega ne more razumno pričakovati, da je seznanjen z:
Those rules shall determine when the limitation period begins to run, the duration thereof and the circumstances under which it is interrupted or suspended.
ravnanjem in dejstvom, da to ravnanje predstavlja kršitev konkurenčnega prava;
Limitation periods shall not begin to run before the infringement of competition law has ceased and the claimant knows, or can reasonably be expected to know:
dejstvom, da mu je kršitev konkurenčnega prava povzročila škodo, in
of the behaviour and the fact that it constitutes an infringement of competition law;
identiteto kršitelja.
of the fact that the infringement of competition law caused harm to it; and
Države članice zagotovijo, da so zastaralni roki za vložitev odškodninskih tožb vsaj pet let.
the identity of the infringer.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se zastaralni roki pretrgajo ali, odvisno od nacionalnega prava, prekinejo, če organ, pristojen za konkurenco, sprejme ukrep za namen preiskave ali postopka zaradi kršitve konkurenčnega prava, s katerim je povezana odškodninska tožba.
Member States shall ensure that the limitation periods for bringing actions for damages are at least five years.
Pretrganje zastaranja preneha najprej eno leto po pravnomočnosti odločbe o kršitvi ali drugačnem zaključku postopka.
Member States shall ensure that a limitation period is suspended or, depending on national law, interrupted, if a competition authority takes action for the purpose of the investigation or its proceedings in respect of an infringement of competition law to which the action for damages relates.
Člen 11
The suspension shall end at the earliest one year after the infringement decision has become final or after the proceedings are otherwise terminated.
Solidarna odgovornost
Article 11
Države članice zagotovijo, da so podjetja, ki so s skupnim ravnanjem kršila konkurenčno pravo, solidarno odgovorna za škodo, povzročeno s kršitvijo konkurenčnega prava; vsako od teh podjetij mora plačati celotno škodo, oškodovanec pa ima pravico od katerega koli od njih zahtevati popolno odškodnino za škodo, dokler ni v celoti poplačan.
Joint and several liability
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 države članice zagotovijo, da brez poseganja v pravico do popolne odškodnine iz člena 3, kadar je kršitelj malo ali srednje veliko podjetje (MSP) v skladu z opredelitvijo iz Priporočila Komisije 2003/361/ES [8], je ta kršitelj odgovoren le svojim neposrednim in posrednim kupcem, kadar:(a) je bil njegov tržni delež na zadevnem trgu v času kršitve konkurenčnega prava nenehno pod 5 % ter
Member States shall ensure that undertakings which have infringed competition law through joint behaviour are jointly and severally liable for the harm caused by the infringement of competition law; with the effect that each of those undertakings is bound to compensate for the harm in full, and the injured party has the right to require full compensation from any of them until he has been fully compensated.
bi uporaba običajnih pravil o solidarni odgovornosti nepopravljivo ogrozila njegovo gospodarsko sposobnost preživetja in povzročila, da bi njegova sredstva izgubila vso vrednost.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that, without prejudice to the right of full compensation as laid down in Article 3, where the infringer is a small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) as defined in Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC [8], the infringer is liable only to its own direct and indirect purchasers where:(a) its market share in the relevant market was below 5 % at any time during the infringement of competition law; and
Odstopanje iz odstavka 2 se ne uporablja kadar:
the application of the normal rules of joint and several liability would irretrievably jeopardise its economic viability and cause its assets to lose all their value.
je MSP odgovorno za kršitev konkurenčnega prava ali je druga podjetja prisililo, da sodelujejo pri kršitvi, ali
The derogation laid down in paragraph 2 shall not apply where:
je bilo predhodno ugotovljeno, da je MSP kršilo konkurenčno pravo.
the SME has led the infringement of competition law or has coerced other undertakings to participate therein; or
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 države članice zagotovijo, da je oseba z imuniteto solidarno odgovorna:
the SME has previously been found to have infringed competition law.
svojim neposrednim ali posrednim kupcem ali dobaviteljem in
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that an immunity recipient is jointly and severally liable as follows:
drugim oškodovancem, vendar le, kadar od drugih podjetij, ki so vpletena v isto kršitev konkurenčnega prava, ni mogoče pridobiti popolne odškodnine.
to its direct or indirect purchasers or providers; and
Države članice zagotovijo, da je vsak zastaralni rok, veljaven za primere iz tega odstavka razumen in dovolj dolg, da lahko oškodovanec vloži tožbo.
to other injured parties only where full compensation cannot be obtained from the other undertakings that were involved in the same infringement of competition law.
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko kršitelj zahteva od vsakega drugega kršitelja, naj mu povrne znesek, ki se določi glede na njegov relativni delež v škodi, povzročeni s kršitvijo konkurenčnega prava.
Member States shall ensure that any limitation period applicable to cases under this paragraph is reasonable and sufficient to allow injured parties to bring such actions.
Znesek prispevka kršitelja, ki mu je organ, pristojen za konkurenco, priznal imuniteto pred globami v okviru programa prizanesljivosti, ne preseže deleža v škodi, ki jo je podjetje povzročilo svojim neposrednim ali posrednim kupcem ali dobaviteljem.
Member States shall ensure that an infringer may recover a contribution from any other infringer, the amount of which shall be determined in the light of their relative responsibility for the harm caused by the infringement of competition law.
Kar zadeva kršitev konkurenčnega prava, s katero je bila povzročena škoda oškodovancem, ki niso neposredni ali posredni kupci ali dobavitelji kršiteljev, države članice zagotovijo, da se obseg prispevka osebe z imuniteto drugim kršiteljem določi glede na njen delež odgovornosti v takšni škodi.
The amount of contribution of an infringer which has been granted immunity from fines under a leniency programme shall not exceed the amount of the harm it caused to its own direct or indirect purchasers or providers.
POGLAVJE IV
Member States shall ensure that, to the extent the infringement of competition law caused harm to injured parties other than the direct or indirect purchasers or providers of the infringers, the amount of any contribution from an immunity recipient to other infringers shall be determined in the light of its relative responsibility for that harm.
NADALJNJI PRENOS POVEČANIH STROŠKOV
CHAPTER IV
Člen 12
THE PASSING-ON OF OVERCHARGES
Nadaljnji prenos povečanih stroškov in pravica do popolne odškodnine
Article 12
Da se zagotovi polna učinkovitost uveljavljanja pravice do popolne odškodnine iz člena 3, države članice zagotovijo, da lahko odškodnina za škodo v skladu s pravili iz tega poglavja zahteva vsakdo, ki je škodo utrpel, ne glede na to, ali je neposredni ali posredni kupec kršitelja, ter da se preprečijo odškodnine za škodo, ki presegajo škodo, povzročeno tožniku s kršitvijo konkurenčnega prava, in neprevzem odgovornosti s strani kršitelja.
Passing-on of overcharges and the right to full compensation
Da bi se izognili čezmernim odškodninam, države članice določijo ustrezna postopkovna pravila, s katerimi naj bi zagotovile, da odškodnina za dejansko izgubo na kateri koli stopnji dobavne verige ne presega povečanih stroškov škode, povzročene na tej stopnji.
To ensure the full effectiveness of the right to full compensation as laid down in Article 3, Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with the rules laid down in this Chapter, compensation of harm can be claimed by anyone who suffered it, irrespective of whether they are direct or indirect purchasers from an infringer, and that compensation of harm exceeding that caused by the infringement of competition law to the claimant, as well as the absence of liability of the infringer, are avoided.
To poglavje ne posega v pravico oškodovanca, da zahteva in dobi odškodnino za izgubljeni dobiček zaradi polnega ali delnega nadaljnjega prenosa povečanih stroškov.
In order to avoid overcompensation, Member States shall lay down procedural rules appropriate to ensure that compensation for actual loss at any level of the supply chain does not exceed the overcharge harm suffered at that level.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se pravila iz tega poglavja ustrezno uporabijo, kadar je kršitev konkurenčnega prava povezana z dobavo kršitelju.
This Chapter shall be without prejudice to the right of an injured party to claim and obtain compensation for loss of profits due to a full or partial passing-on of the overcharge.
Države članice zagotovijo, da so nacionalna sodišča v skladu z nacionalnimi postopki pristojna, da ocenijo, kateri del povečanih stroškov se je prenesel naprej.
Member States shall ensure that the rules laid down in this Chapter apply accordingly where the infringement of competition law relates to a supply to the infringer.
Člen 13
Member States shall ensure that the national courts have the power to estimate, in accordance with national procedures, the share of any overcharge that was passed on.
Ugovor nadaljnjega prenosa
Article 13
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko toženec v postopku v zvezi z odškodninsko tožbo kot ugovor zoper odškodninski zahtevek uveljavlja dejstvo, da je tožnik v celoti ali delno prenesel naprej povečane stroške, ki so posledica kršitve konkurenčnega prava.
Passing-on defence
Dokazno breme glede nadaljnjega prenosa povečanih stroškov nosi toženec, ki lahko upravičeno zahteva razkritje od tožnika ali tretjih oseb.
Member States shall ensure that the defendant in an action for damages can invoke as a defence against a claim for damages the fact that the claimant passed on the whole or part of the overcharge resulting from the infringement of competition law.
Člen 14
The burden of proving that the overcharge was passed on shall be on the defendant, who may reasonably require disclosure from the claimant or from third parties.
Posredni kupci
Article 14
Kadar je v postopku z odškodninsko tožbo obstoj odškodninskega zahtevka ali znesek odškodnine, ki se dodeli, odvisen od tega, ali – oziroma v kakšnem obsegu – so se povečani stroški prenesli naprej na tožnika, države članice ob upoštevanju trgovinske prakse, da se povečanja cene prenašajo po dobavni verigi naprej, zagotovijo, da dokazno breme glede obstoja in obsega takšnega nadaljnjega prenosa nosi tožnik, ki lahko utemeljeno zahteva razkritje od toženca ali tretjih oseb.
Indirect purchasers
V primeru iz odstavka 1 se šteje, da je posredni kupec dokazal, da so bili nanj preneseni povečani stroški, če posredni kupec dokaže:
Member States shall ensure that, where in an action for damages the existence of a claim for damages or the amount of compensation to be awarded depends on whether, or to what degree, an overcharge was passed on to the claimant, taking into account the commercial practice that price increases are passed on down the supply chain, the burden of proving the existence and scope of such a passing-on shall rest with the claimant, who may reasonably require disclosure from the defendant or from third parties.
da je toženec kršil konkurenčno pravo;
In the situation referred to in paragraph 1, the indirect purchaser shall be deemed to have proven that a passing-on to that indirect purchaser occurred where that indirect purchaser has shown that:
da so bili posledica kršitve konkurenčnega prava povečani stroški za neposrednega kupca toženca in
the defendant has committed an infringement of competition law;
da je posredni kupec kupil blago ali storitve, ki so bili predmet kršitve konkurenčnega prava, oziroma je kupil blago ali storitve, ki izhajajo iz blaga ali storitev, ki so bile predmet kršitve, ali pa vsebujejo takšno blago ali storitve.
the infringement of competition law has resulted in an overcharge for the direct purchaser of the defendant; and
Ta odstavek se ne uporablja, če lahko toženec sodišču prepričljivo dokaže, da povečani stroški niso bili ali niso bili v celoti preneseni na posrednega kupca.
the indirect purchaser has purchased the goods or services that were the object of the infringement of competition law, or has purchased goods or services derived from or containing them.
Člen 15
This paragraph shall not apply where the defendant can demonstrate credibly to the satisfaction of the court that the overcharge was not, or was not entirely, passed on to the indirect purchaser.
Odškodninske tožbe tožnikov z različnih stopenj dobavne verige
Article 15
Države članice z namenom preprečevanja, da bi odškodninske tožbe tožnikov z različnih stopenj dobavne verige vodile do večplastne odgovornosti ali neobstoja odgovornosti kršitelja, zagotovijo, da lahko nacionalna sodišča, pri katerih so bile vložene odškodninske tožbe, pri ocenjevanju, ali so zahteve dokaznega bremena, ki izhajajo iz uporabe členov 13 in 14, izpolnjene, s sredstvi, ki so na voljo v skladu s pravom Unije ali nacionalnim pravom, ustrezno upoštevajo:
Actions for damages by claimants from different levels in the supply chain
odškodninske tožbe, ki so povezane z isto kršitvijo konkurenčnega prava, vendar so jih vložili tožniki z drugih stopenj dobavne verige;
To avoid that actions for damages by claimants from different levels in the supply chain lead to a multiple liability or to an absence of liability of the infringer, Member States shall ensure that in assessing whether the burden of proof resulting from the application of Articles 13 and 14 is satisfied, national courts seized of an action for damages are able, by means available under Union or national law, to take due account of any of the following:
sodbe, izdane na podlagi odškodninskih tožb iz točke (a);
actions for damages that are related to the same infringement of competition law, but that are brought by claimants from other levels in the supply chain;
relevantne javno dostopne informacije, ki izhajajo iz primerov izvajanja konkurenčnega prava v javnem interesu.
judgments resulting from actions for damages as referred to in point (a);
Ta člen ne posega v pravice in obveznosti nacionalnih sodišč iz člena 30 Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012.
relevant information in the public domain resulting from the public enforcement of competition law.
Člen 16
This Article shall be without prejudice to the rights and obligations of national courts under Article 30 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012.
Smernice za nacionalna sodišča
Article 16
Komisija izda smernice za nacionalna sodišča o tem, kako oceniti delež povečanih stroškov, ki so bili preneseni naprej na posrednega kupca.
Guidelines for national courts
POGLAVJE V
The Commission shall issue guidelines for national courts on how to estimate the share of the overcharge which was passed on to the indirect purchaser.
OCENJEVANJE VIŠINE ŠKODE
CHAPTER V
Člen 17
QUANTIFICATION OF HARM
Ocenjevanje višine škode
Article 17
Države članice zagotovijo, da dokazno breme ter dokazni standard, ki sta potrebna za ocenitev višine škode, ne moreta v praksi onemogočiti uveljavljanja pravice do odškodnine ali ga pretirano otežiti.
Quantification of harm
Države članice zagotovijo, da so nacionalna sodišča v skladu z nacionalnimi postopki pristojna za ocenjevanje višine škode, če se dokaže, da je tožnik utrpel škodo, vendar natančne ocene višine utrpele škode na podlagi razpoložljivih dokazov v praksi ni mogoče podati ali je to pretirano oteženo.
Member States shall ensure that neither the burden nor the standard of proof required for the quantification of harm renders the exercise of the right to damages practically impossible or excessively difficult.
Domneva se, da kartelne kršitve povzročajo škodo.
Member States shall ensure that the national courts are empowered, in accordance with national procedures, to estimate the amount of harm if it is established that a claimant suffered harm but it is practically impossible or excessively difficult precisely to quantify the harm suffered on the basis of the evidence available.
Kršitelj ima pravico, da izpodbija to domnevo.
It shall be presumed that cartel infringements cause harm.
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko nacionalni organ, pristojen za konkurenco v postopkih v zvezi z odškodninskimi tožbami, na zahtevo nacionalnega sodišča pomaga temu nacionalnemu sodišču pri določitvi višine škode, če ta nacionalni organ, pristojen za konkurenco, smatra, da je njegova pomoč primerna.
The infringer shall have the right to rebut that presumption.
POGLAVJE VI
Member States shall ensure that, in proceedings relating to an action for damages, a national competition authority may, upon request of a national court, assist that national court with respect to the determination of the quantum of damages where that national competition authority considers such assistance to be appropriate.
SPORAZUMNO REŠEVANJE SPOROV
CONSENSUAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Odložilni učinki in drugi učinki sporazumnega reševanja sporov
Article 18
Države članice zagotovijo, da se zastaralni rok glede vložitve odškodninske tožbe pretrga za čas postopka sporazumnega reševanja spora.
Suspensive and other effects of consensual dispute resolution
Pretrganje zastaralnega roka se uporabi le v zvezi s tistimi strankami, ki sodelujejo ali so sodelovale oziroma so (bile) zastopane pri sporazumnem reševanju spora.
Member States shall ensure that the limitation period for bringing an action for damages is suspended for the duration of any consensual dispute resolution process.
Države članice brez poseganja v določbe nacionalnega prava s področja arbitraže nacionalnim sodiščem, pri katerih je bila vložena odškodninska tožba, zagotovijo možnost, da pretrgajo postopek do dveh let, kadar stranke v tem postopku sodelujejo pri sporazumnem reševanju spora v zvezi z zahtevkom iz te odškodninske tožbe.
The suspension of the limitation period shall apply only with regard to those parties that are or that were involved or represented in the consensual dispute resolution.
Organ, pristojen za konkurenco, lahko presodi, da odškodnino, plačano na podlagi sporazumne poravnave in preden je bila izdana odločba o naložitvi globe, šteje kot olajševalna okoliščina.
Without prejudice to provisions of national law in matters of arbitration, Member States shall ensure that national courts seized of an action for damages may suspend their proceedings for up to two years where the parties thereto are involved in consensual dispute resolution concerning the claim covered by that action for damages.
Člen 19
A competition authority may consider compensation paid as a result of a consensual settlement and prior to its decision imposing a fine to be a mitigating factor.
Učinek sporazumnih poravnav za nadaljnje odškodninske tožbe
Effect of consensual settlements on subsequent actions for damages
Države članice z odstopanjem od odstavka 2 zagotovijo, da v primeru, ko sokršitelji, ki ne sklenejo poravnave, ne morejo plačati odškodnine, ki ustreza preostalemu znesku zahtevka oškodovanca, ki sklene poravnavo, ta oškodovanec lahko izterja preostali znesek zahtevka od sokršitelja, ki sklene poravnavo.
Member States shall ensure that, following a consensual settlement, the claim of the settling injured party is reduced by the settling co-infringer's share of the harm that the infringement of competition law inflicted upon the injured party.
Odstopanje iz prvega pododstavka se lahko izrecno izključi v okviru pogojev sporazumne poravnave.
Any remaining claim of the settling injured party shall be exercised only against non-settling co-infringers.
Pri določanju zneska prispevka, ki ga lahko sokršitelj izterja od katerega koli drugega sokršitelja v skladu z njegovo relativno odgovornostjo za škodo, povzročeno s kršitvijo konkurenčnega prava, nacionalna sodišča ustrezno upoštevajo morebitne odškodnine, plačane na podlagi predhodne sporazumne poravnave, ki jo je sklenil zadevni sokršitelj.
Non-settling co-infringers shall not be permitted to recover contribution for the remaining claim from the settling co-infringer.
POGLAVJE VII
By way of derogation from paragraph 2, Member States shall ensure that where the non-settling co-infringers cannot pay the damages that correspond to the remaining claim of the settling injured party, the settling injured party may exercise the remaining claim against the settling co-infringer.
KONČNE DOLOČBE
The derogation referred to in the first subparagraph may be expressly excluded under the terms of the consensual settlement.
Člen 20
When determining the amount of contribution that a co-infringer may recover from any other co-infringer in accordance with their relative responsibility for the harm caused by the infringement of competition law, national courts shall take due account of any damages paid pursuant to a prior consensual settlement involving the relevant co-infringer.
Pregled
CHAPTER VII
Komisija pregleda izvajanje te direktive ter o njenem izvajanju predloži poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu do 27. decembra 2020.
FINAL PROVISIONS
Poročilo iz odstavka 1 med drugim vključuje naslednje informacije:
Article 20
možen vpliv finančnih omejitev kot posledice plačila glob, ki jih naloži organ, pristojen za konkurenco, zaradi kršitve konkurenčnega prava, na možnost oškodovancev, da pridobijo popolno odškodnino za škodo, ki jo je povzročila ta kršitev konkurenčnega prava;
Review
v kolikšni meri vlagatelji odškodninskih zahtevkov za škodo, ki jo je povzročila kršitev konkurenčnega prava, ugotovljena v odločbi o kršitvi, ki jo sprejme organ države članice, pristojen za konkurenco, pred nacionalnim sodiščem druge države članice niso mogli dokazati, da se je taka kršitev konkurenčnega prava zgodila;