natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The investigation found that the ‘highly technical’ product types referred to by the party have the basic physical, chemical, and technical characteristics as the other products subject to the investigation.
V preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo vrste „visokotehnoloških“ izdelkov, ki jih je navedla zadevna stran, enake osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične značilnosti kot drugi izdelki, zajeti v preiskavo.
They are made from stainless steel and they are wires, and the production process is similar, using similar machines, such that producers can switch between different variants of the product according to demand.
Gre za žice iz nerjavnega jekla in uporablja se podobni proizvodni postopek s podobnimi stroji, kar pomeni, da lahko proizvajalci glede na povpraševanje izmenično proizvajajo različne različice izdelka.
Therefore, although different types of wires are not directly interchangeable and do not directly compete, producers are competing for contracts covering a broad range of stainless steel wires.
Čeprav različne vrste žic niso neposredno zamenljive in med seboj neposredno ne konkurirajo, se proizvajalci potegujejo za naročila, ki zajemajo širok nabor žic iz nerjavnega jekla.
Moreover, these product types are produced and sold by both the Union industry and the Indian exporting producers using a similar production method.
Poleg tega te vrste izdelkov po podobni proizvodni metodi proizvajajo in prodajajo tako industrija Unije kot indijski proizvajalci izvozniki.
In response to final disclosure, one party claimed that the analysis carried out by the Commission in terms of establishing whether the so-called highly technical product types should be included in the investigation was insufficient.
V odzivu na dokončno razkritje je ena od zainteresiranih strani trdila, da je bila analiza, ki jo je opravila Komisija za določitev, ali bi bilo treba vrste tako imenovanih visokotehnoloških izdelkov vključiti v preiskavo, nezadostna.
The investigation established that the highly technical product types fall within the product definition as stated in recital 17.
V preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da so vrste visokotehnoloških izdelkov zajete v opredelitvi izdelka iz uvodne izjave 17. Zadevna stran napačno sklepa, da morajo biti hkrati izpolnjena vsa merila, navedena v sodni praksi. To ne drži.
The party wrongly assumes that all the criteria referred to in the case-law have to be met at the same time.. According to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union [7], the Commission enjoys a wide discretion when defining the product scope, and has to base this assessment on the set of criteria developed by the Court.
V skladu s sodno prakso [7] je Komisiji pri opredelitvi obsega izdelka zagotovljena široka diskrecijska pravica, to oceno pa mora utemeljiti na merilih, ki jih je določilo Sodišče.
Often, as in the present case, some criteria may point in one and some in the other direction; in such a situation, the Commission needs to carry out a global assessment, as it has done in the present case.
Nekatera merila lahko pogosto, kot v tem primeru, kažejo v eno smer, druga pa v drugo; v takšnem primeru mora Komisija opraviti celovito oceno, kot je to storila v tej zadevi.
It is therefore wrongly assumed by this interested party that product types need to share all characteristics in order to fall in the same product definition.
Zato je ta zainteresirana stran napačno sklepala, da so vrste izdelka lahko zajete v isto opredelitev izdelka le, če so vse njihove značilnosti enake.
Some users claimed that the so-called stainless steel ‘series 200’ wires should be excluded from the product scope.
Nekateri uporabniki so trdili, da bi bilo treba tako imenovane žice iz nerjavnega jekla „serije 200“ izključiti iz obsega izdelka.
In particular, they alleged this type was hardly produced by the Union industry.
Zlasti so trdili, da industrija Unije te vrste izdelka praktično ne proizvaja.
First, the fact that a certain product type is not produced by the Union industry is not a sufficient reason to exclude it from the scope of the investigation, where the production process is such that Union producers could start producing the product type in question.
Dejstvo, da industrija Unije določene vrste izdelka ne proizvaja, ni zadosten razlog za njeno izključitev iz obsega preiskave, če gre za proizvodni proces, ki bi ga proizvajalci Unije lahko uporabili za začetek proizvodnje zadevne vrste izdelka.
Second, as for highly technical wires, it was found that these types of the product concerned have basic physical, chemical, and technical characteristics identical or similar to other types of the like product produced and sold by the Union industry.
Poleg tega je bilo za visokotehnološke žice ugotovljeno, da imajo te vrste zadevnega izdelka enake ali podobne osnovne fizikalne, kemične in tehnične značilnosti kot druge vrste podobnega izdelka, ki jih proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije.
Alternatively, they claimed that wire rod should be included in the definition of the product concerned.
Poleg tega so trdili, da bi bilo treba v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka vključiti valjano žico.
However, wire rod is the raw material used for the production of the product concerned but can also be used for the production of different products such as fasteners and nails.
Valjana žica je sicer surovina, ki se uporablja za proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka, vendar se lahko uporablja tudi za proizvodnjo drugih izdelkov, kot so pritrdilni elementi in žeblji.
Therefore, contrary to the product concerned, it does not constitute a finished steel product.
Zato v nasprotju z zadevnim izdelkom ne gre za končni jekleni izdelek.
Through the cold forming production process, the wire rod, amongst other products, can be transformed into the product concerned or the like product.
V proizvodnem procesu hladnega oblikovanja se lahko valjano žico med drugim preoblikuje v zadevni izdelek ali podobni izdelek.
On that basis, wire rod cannot be included in the product scope within the meaning of the basic Regulation.
Na tej podlagi valjane žice ni mogoče vključiti v obseg izdelka v smislu osnovne uredbe.
During the verification visits at the premises of the three originally sampled Indian exporting producers and the subsequent analysis of the collected information, it was found that these companies had submitted some information which could not be considered reliable.
Med preveritvenimi obiski v prostorih treh prvotno vzorčenih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in med poznejšo analizo zbranih informacij je bilo ugotovljeno, da so te družbe predložile nekaj informacij, ki jih ni bilo mogoče šteti za zanesljive.
The Commission continued its investigation, analysing all information submitted in reaction to the provisional disclosure and in subsequent hearings.
Komisija je nadaljevala preiskavo ter analizirala vse podatke, predložene po začasnem razkritju in v okviru zaslišanj, ki so sledila.
As indicated in recital 26 of the provisional Regulation, in the case of one exporting producer, the Commission had found that the costs reported in the questionnaire reply could not be reconciled with the company’s internal cost reporting system.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 26 začasne uredbe, je Komisija za enega od proizvajalcev izvoznikov ugotovila, da se stroški, navedeni v odgovoru na vprašalnik, ne ujemajo s podatki iz njegovega notranjega sistema za poročanje o stroških.
The company had argued that the lack of reconciliation was caused by registration errors and a valuation method of stocks that differed between the internal cost reporting system and the data published in the annual accounts.
Družba je trdila, da je do neujemanja prišlo zaradi napak pri vodenju evidenc ter ker sta bili v notranjem sistemu za poročanje o stroških in pri podatkih, objavljenih v letnih računovodskih izkazih, uporabljeni različni metodi vrednotenja zalog.
As explained in recital 28 of the provisional Regulation, although the data contained in the internal cost reporting system were consistent with the audited financial statements at company-wide level, it was not possible to reconcile the data generated by the internal cost reporting system for the wire division to the cost tables specifically prepared by the company in reply to the investigation’s questionnaire.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 28 začasne uredbe, ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti skladnosti med podatki iz notranjega sistema za poročanje o stroških za področje proizvodnje žic in razpredelnicami stroškov, ki jih je družba pripravila posebej za odgovor na vprašalnik, kljub temu, da so bili podatki iz notranjega sistema za poročanje o stroških skladni z revidiranimi računovodskimi izkazi družbe.
Hence, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, it was considered that the information found in the internal cost reporting system should be used for the purpose of the anti-dumping investigation.
Zato se je v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe štelo, da je treba za namen protidampinške preiskave uporabiti informacije iz notranjega sistema za poročanje o stroških.
For that reason, the Commission provisionally adjusted the cost data provided by the exporting producer in its questionnaire reply by using the facts available in the internal cost reporting system.
Zato je Komisija na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev iz notranjega sistema za poročanje o stroških začasno prilagodila podatke o stroških, ki jih je zagotovil proizvajalec izvoznik v izpolnjenem vprašalniku.
As noted in recital 27 of the provisional Regulation, the exporting producer argued that the data in the internal cost reporting system were not reliable and should not be used for the purpose of the investigation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 27 začasne uredbe, je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil tudi, da podatki v notranjem sistemu za poročanje o stroških niso zanesljivi in se ne bi smeli uporabiti za namen preiskave.
The company pointed to several errors and conceptual problems regarding the internally reported figures on which the Commission had based its adjustment of the costs.
Družba je opozorila na več napak in konceptualne težave v zvezi z notranje izkazanimi podatki, na katerih je Komisija utemeljila svojo prilagoditev stroškov.
The company claimed that the Commission should have based its analysis on the costs reported in the questionnaire reply.
Družba je trdila, da bi morala Komisija svojo analizo osnovati na stroških, navedenih v odgovoru na vprašalnik.
Additionally, at a later stage following the provisional measures, the company provided a reconciliation between the internally reported divisional cost figures and the questionnaire reply.
Poleg tega je družba po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov predložila uskladitev notranje izkazanih podatkov o stroških za zadevno področje in podatkov iz vprašalnika.
On that basis, and having regard to the evidence collected during the on-spot visit, certain manufacturing costs originally reported by that company in its questionnaire reply could then be accepted.
Na tej podlagi in ob upoštevanju dokazov, zbranih med obiskom na kraju samem, je bilo mogoče sprejeti nekatere proizvodne stroške, kot jih je prvotno sporočila navedena družba v izpolnjenem vprašalniku.
However, on the basis of the evidence at hand, the allocation of certain costs such as overheads and finance costs reported by the company in its questionnaire reply could not be considered as reliable for the purpose of the investigation.
Vendar na podlagi razpoložljivih dokazov, porazdelitve nekaterih stroškov, kot so režijski in finančni stroški, ki jih je podjetje navedlo v izpolnjenem vprašalniku, ni bilo mogoče obravnavati kot zanesljive za namen preiskave.
The Commission considered that these costs should be allocated based on the total company turnover and cost of goods sold in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je menila, da bi bilo treba te stroške porazdeliti glede na celotni prihodek družbe od prodaje in stroške prodanega blaga v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
Based on the above, most of the costs reported in the questionnaire reply could be accepted and the turnover allocation was agreed by the company at the definitive stage of the investigation.
Glede na navedeno je bilo mogoče večino stroškov, navedenih v izpolnjenem vprašalniku, sprejeti, družba pa se je v zaključni fazi preiskave strinjala s porazdelitvijo prihodka od prodaje.
The level of the dumping margin decreased following a revision of packing costs and certain overheads.
Potem ko so bili stroški pakiranja in nekateri režijski stroški popravljeni, se je stopnja dampinga zmanjšala.
It is thus considered that Article 18 of the basic Regulation should no longer apply to establish the dumping margin of this exporting producer.
Zato se šteje, da za določitev stopnje dampinga za tega proizvajalca izvoznika ni več treba uporabljati člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
As set out in recital 30 of the provisional Regulation, in the case of a second exporting producer, the Commission found that the purchases and the consumption of raw materials reported in the company’s questionnaire reply were not supported by the data found in the producer’s inventory management system.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 30 začasne uredbe, je Komisija za drugega proizvajalca izvoznika ugotovila, da podatki iz njegovega sistema za upravljanje zalog ne potrjujejo podatkov o nabavi in porabi surovin, ki so bili Komisiji sporočeni v izpolnjenem vprašalniku.
In particular, it appeared that the distribution of steel grades was different in each of the sources.
Zlasti se je zdelo, da se je v posameznih virih razlikovala razdelitev po vrstah jekla.
The Commission established that the steel grade is a key factor in the determination of the cost of the final product and that unreliable information concerning the steel grade could seriously distort the determination of costs and sales prices of individual product types and could therefore be misleading, and made the exporting producer aware of this essential consideration at various occasions.
Komisija je ugotovila, da so vrste jekla ključni dejavnik pri določanju stroškov končnega izdelka in da bi nezanesljivi podatki o vrsti jekla lahko resno izkrivljali določitev stroškov in prodajnih cen posamezne vrste izdelka ter bi zato lahko bili zavajajoči; Komisija je proizvajalca izvoznika na to bistveno okoliščino večkrat opozorila.
As set out in recital 31 of the provisional Regulation, the exporting producer claimed, however, that the computer files containing the purchases of raw material collected by the Commission during the verification visit were incomplete, because additional purchases of raw material had been made by other units in the company, but had not been reported and were not included in the computer files collected during the verification visit and examined by the Commission.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 31 začasne uredbe, je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da so bile računalniške datoteke s podatki o nabavi surovin, ki jih je Komisija prevzela med preveritvenim obiskom, nepopolne, saj so druge enote v družbi opravile dodatne nakupe surovin, vendar ti niso bili sporočeni ali vključeni v računalniške datoteke, ki jih je Komisija prevzela med preveritvenim obiskom in proučila.
Furthermore, the exporting producer claimed that the observed discrepancies in the quantities of steel grades were due to the fact that some steel grades were partly overlapping with each other and that some parts of the production process were not traceable at the level of individual steel grades.
Poleg tega je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da so ugotovljena neskladja v količinah vrst jekla posledica dejstva, da se nekatere vrste jekla delno prekrivajo in da nekateri koraki proizvodnega procesa niso sledljivi na ravni posameznih vrst jekla.
In recital 32 of the provisional Regulation, the Commission, however, noted that the above claims made by the company relating to the additional purchases of raw material had not been substantiated and in any event were not sufficient to explain the observed discrepancies at the level of individual steel grades.
Vendar je Komisija v uvodni izjavi 32 začasne uredbe ugotovila, da zgornje trditve družbe v zvezi z dodatnimi nakupi surovin niso bile podkrepljene z dokazi, vsekakor pa ne pojasnjujejo ugotovljenih neskladij na ravni posameznih vrst jekla.
The Commission also noted that the company had alleged that it was not possible to make an exact tracing by individual steel grades in all the stages of the production process.
Komisija je tudi seznanila s trditvijo družbe, da ni mogoče natančno slediti posameznim vrstam jekla v vseh fazah proizvodnega procesa.
This acknowledgment further undermined the reliability of the reporting system of steel grades as a whole.
Ta trditev je še dodatno spodkopala zanesljivost celotnega sistema poročanja o vrstah jekla.
The information provided concerning steel grades was therefore provisionally considered misleading.
Predložene informacije v zvezi z vrstami jekla so se zato začasno štele za zavajajoče.
In recital 33 of the provisional Regulation, the Commission considered that the reported distribution of raw material by steel grade was not reliable and should be provisionally disregarded and that the determinations should be made on the basis of facts available pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
V uvodni izjavi 33 začasne uredbe je Komisija menila, da sporočena razdelitev surovin po vrstah jekla ni zanesljiva in se je začasno ne bi smelo upoštevati ter da bi morale ugotovitve temeljiti na razpoložljivih dejstvih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Due to the unreliability of the reporting system as a whole, it was not possible to make the determinations on the basis of any of the reported steel grades.
Zaradi nezanesljivosti celotnega sistema poročanja ugotovitev ni bilo mogoče utemeljiti z nobeno sporočeno vrsto jekla.
Therefore the total consumption of all raw materials taken as a whole, without considering the distribution by steel grade, was used in calculating an overall dumping margin for all products.
Zato se je za izračun splošne stopnje dampinga za vse izdelke uporabila skupna poraba vseh surovin, brez upoštevanja razdelitve po vrstah jekla.
Following the publication of the provisional findings, the company contested this provisional approach in general terms but continued being unable to offer a one-to-one matching at PCN level.
Po objavi začasnih ugotovitev je družba v splošnem izpodbijala ta začasni pristop, vendar še naprej ni mogla ponuditi popolnega ujemanja na ravni kontrolne številke izdelka.
However, later in the investigation the company offered a sufficient degree of reconciliation when the raw material is grouped in the main series of stainless steel grades according to their chemical composition (the 200-, 300- and 400-series in the AISI classification).
Vendar je družba pozneje v preiskavi ponudila zadostno stopnjo ujemanja, ko je surovino razvrstila glede na kemijsko sestavo glavnih serij vrst nerjavnega jekla (serij 200, 300 in 400 v klasifikaciji AISI).
The company also offered an alternative way of grouping in which the final end-use was included as an additional grouping factor.
Družba je ponudila tudi alternativni način razvrščanja, pri katerem je bila končna uporaba vključena kot dodatni dejavnik za razvrščanje.
However, as the final end-use cannot be verified, the Commission recalculated the dumping margin on the basis of the steel grades grouped by their chemical composition, as expressed in the series of steel grades (the 200-, 300- and 400-series in the AISI classification).
Ker pa končne uporabe ni mogoče preveriti, je Komisija stopnjo dampinga ponovno izračunala na podlagi razvrstitve vrst jekla, ki temelji na kemični sestavi vrst jekla po klasifikaciji AISI (serije 200, 300 in 400).
The series of steel grades are a generally used, objective and verifiable criterion whereas, for this company, the use of the PCN did not allow for full reconciliation and therefore would not ensure a fair comparison on the basis of reliable data within the meaning of the basic Regulation.
Serije vrst jekla so splošno uporabljeno, objektivno in preverljivo merilo, pri tej družbi pa z uporabo kontrolne številke izdelka ni mogoče doseči popolnega ujemanja in zato poštena primerjava na podlagi zanesljivih podatkov v smislu osnovne uredbe ne bi bila mogoča.
Since the additional information submitted by the company did not allow for the data to be reconciled in the sufficiently detailed manner required for the investigation, the provisional conclusion that the company’s tracing systems were not sufficiently reliable is maintained and Article 18 of the basic Regulation is applied for the definitive determination of cost of production and the dumping margin calculation, which is therefore based on the approach referred to in the previous recital.
Ker pa dodatne informacije, ki jih je predložila družba, niso omogočile ujemanja podatkov, ki bi bilo dovolj podrobno za potrebe preiskave, se ohrani začasna ugotovitev, da sistemi sledenja družbe niso dovolj zanesljivi, in uporablja se člen 18 osnovne uredbe za dokončno določitev stroškov proizvodnje in izračun stopnje dampinga, ki torej temelji na pristopu iz prejšnje uvodne izjave.
As indicated in recital 34 of the provisional Regulation, in the case of the third exporting producer, during the verification visit the Commission found that the flows of raw materials reported in the questionnaire reply were not consistent with the data contained in the producer’s accounting system.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 34 začasne uredbe, je Komisija za tretjega proizvajalca izvoznika med preveritvenim obiskom ugotovila, da tokovi surovin, sporočeni v izpolnjenem vprašalniku, niso bili skladni s podatki iz računovodskega sistema proizvajalca.
It appeared that the distribution per steel grades was different in each of the two sources.
Zdelo se je, da se je razdelitev po vrstah jekla v obeh virih razlikovala.
As indicated in recital 35 of the provisional Regulation, the exporting producer, while admitting some errors in its questionnaire reply, alleged that the differences in the overall quantities of raw material could be reconciled by taking into account the changes in inventories.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 35 začasne uredbe, je proizvajalec izvoznik priznal nekaj napak v svojem odgovoru na vprašalnik, hkrati pa je trdil, da je razlike v skupnih količinah surovin mogoče uskladiti z upoštevanjem sprememb v zalogah.
However, the company also alleged that partly overlapping steel grades made it impossible to make an exact reconciliation as per each individual steel grade.
Toda družba je trdila tudi, da zaradi delnega prekrivanja vrst jekla ni bilo mogoče natančno uskladiti podatkov za vsako posamezno vrsto jekla.
In its comments following the provisional findings, it also stated that, occasionally, the steel grade indicated on the sales invoice did not correspond to the actual steel grade being exported.
V svojih pripombah na začasne ugotovitve je navedla tudi, da vrsta jekla na prodajnem računu včasih ne ustreza dejanski vrsti jekla, ki se izvaža.
Furthermore, the company argued that steel grades were not used in a precise manner in the stainless steel industry, and that there were variations between the published chemical compositions of steel grades and the actual products.
Poleg tega je družba trdila, da se vrste jekla v industriji nerjavnega jekla ne uporabljajo dosledno ter da obstajajo razlike med objavljeno kemično sestavo vrst jekla in kemično sestavo dejanskih izdelkov.
The company argued that when taking into account these explanations, the discrepancies identified by the Commission would concern only an insignificant proportion of its exports.
Družba je trdila, da bi neskladja, ki jih je ugotovila Komisija, ob upoštevanju teh pojasnil zadevala le zanemarljiv delež njenega izvoza.
The Commission considered that the volume of the detected discrepancies could not be explained by occasional imprecisions.
Menila je, da obsega ugotovljenih neskladij ni mogoče pojasniti z občasno nenatančnostjo.