natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With regard to the application by automated dipping, the Commission considers that the contested product should be subject to the provisions established by a previous Commission Decision [8] addressing the protection of the health of professional users when applying IPBC containing products by this application method.
Glede nanašanja z avtomatizirano potopitvijo Komisija meni, da bi morale za sporni proizvod veljati določbe iz prejšnjega sklepa Komisije [8], v katerem je obravnavano varovanje zdravja poklicnih uporabnikov pri uporabi proizvodov, ki vsebujejo IPBC, s to metodo nanašanja.
Consequently, the contested product should be authorised subject to instructions on the label restricting the use to fully automated dipping processes and the product authorisation should be amended accordingly.
Zato bi bilo sporni proizvod treba odobriti pod pogojem, da se na etiketi navedejo navodila, ki uporabo omejujejo na postopek popolnoma avtomatizirane potopitve, dovoljenje za proizvod pa bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 applies to the contested product in accordance with the provisions of Article 92(2) of that Regulation.
Uredba (EU) št. 528/2012 se za sporni proizvod uporablja v skladu z določbami člena 92(2) navedene uredbe.
Since the legal basis for this Decision is Article 36(3) of that Regulation, this Decision should be addressed to all Member States by virtue of Article 36(4) of that Regulation.
Ker je pravna podlaga za ta sklep člen 36(3) navedene uredbe, bi moral biti ta sklep naslovljen na vse države članice v smislu člena 36(4) navedene uredbe.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Biocidal Products,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za biocidne pripravke –
This Decision applies to products identified by the following application reference numbers in the Reference Member State, as provided for by the Register for Biocidal Products:
Ta sklep se uporablja za proizvode, ki imajo v referenčni državi članici naslednje referenčne številke vloge, kakor so določene v registru biocidnih proizvodov:
The proposal by Germany not to authorise the biocidal products referred to in Article 1 for spraying outdoors, is rejected.
Predlog Nemčije, naj se biocidni pripravki iz člena 1 za pršenje na prostem ne odobrijo, se zavrne.
Where used for automated dipping, authorisations of biocidal products identified by the application reference number 2010/2709/7626/UK/AA/8666 shall include a condition that the label of the products contains the following instruction:
Dovoljenja za biocidne pripravke z referenčno številko vloge 2010/2709/7626/UK/AA/8666, ki se uporabljajo pri avtomatiziranih postopkih potopitve, vključujejo pogoj, da se na etiketi pripravkov navedejo naslednja navodila:
‘Product (insert name of the product) must only be used in fully automated dipping processes where all steps in the treatment and drying process are mechanised and no manual handling takes place, including when the treated articles are transported through the dip tank to the draining/drying and storage (if not already surface dry before moving to storage).
„Pripravek (vstaviti ime pripravka) se lahko uporablja samo v popolnoma avtomatiziranih postopkih potopitve, pri katerih so vse faze postopka obdelave in sušenja mehanizirane in ni ročnega ravnanja, tudi kadar se obdelani predmeti prek posode za potopitev prenesejo v prostor za odcejanje/sušenje in skladiščenje (če njihova površina ni suha že pred skladiščenjem).
Where appropriate, the wooden articles to be treated must be fully secured (e.g. via tension belts or clamping devices) prior to treatment and during the dipping process, and must not be manually handled until after the treated articles are surface dry.’
Po potrebi je treba lesene predmete, ki so obdelujejo, popolnoma zaščititi (npr. z elastičnimi pasovi ali pripravami za spajanje) pred obdelavo ali med postopkom potopitve in se z njimi ne sme ročno ravnati, dokler njihova površina ni suha.“
Done at Brussels, 29 October 2014.
V Bruslju, 29. oktobra 2014
OJ L 167, 27.6.2012, p.
UL L 167, 27.6.2012, str.
Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market (OJ L 123, 24.4.1998, p.
Direktiva 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 1998 o dajanju biocidnih pripravkov v promet (UL L 123, 24.4.1998, str.
Commission Directive 2008/78/EC of 25 July 2008 amending Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to include propiconazole as an active substance in Annex I thereto (OJ L 198, 26.7.2008, p.
Direktiva Komisije 2008/78/ES z dne 25. julija 2008 o spremembi Direktive 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta za vključitev propikonazola kot aktivne snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi (UL L 198, 26.7.2008, str.
Commission Directive 2008/79/EC of 28 July 2008 amending Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to include IPBC as an active substance in Annex I thereto (OJ L 200, 29.7.2008, p.
Direktiva Komisije 2008/79/ES z dne 28. julija 2008 o spremembi Direktive 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta za vključitev IPBC kot aktivne snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi (UL L 200, 29.7.2008, str.
concerning restrictions of the authorisation of a biocidal product containing IPBC notified by Germany in accordance with Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o omejitvah dovoljenja za biocidni pripravek, ki vsebuje IPBC in ki ga je Nemčija priglasila v skladu z Direktivo 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2014) 7914)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 7914)
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products [1], and in particular Article 36(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2012 o dostopnosti na trgu in uporabi biocidnih proizvodov [1] ter zlasti člena 36(3) Uredbe,
Annex I to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] contained the list of active substances approved at Union level for inclusion in biocidal products.
Priloga I k Direktivi 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] vsebuje seznam aktivnih snovi, odobrenih na ravni Unije za vključitev v biocidne pripravke.
Commission Directive 2008/79/EC [3] added the active substance IPBC for use in products belonging to product-type 8, wood preservatives, as defined in Annex V to Directive 98/8/EC.
Z Direktivo Komisije 2008/79/ES [3] je bila dodana aktivna snov IPBC za uporabo v pripravkih, ki spadajo v 8. vrsto izdelkov, pripravki za zaščito lesa, kakor so opredeljeni v Prilogi V k Direktivi 98/8/ES.
By virtue of Article 86 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, this substance is therefore an approved active substance included in the list referred to in Article 9(2) of that Regulation.
V skladu s členom 86 Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 je ta snov torej odobrena aktivna snov, vključena na seznam iz člena 9(2) navedene uredbe.
In accordance with Article 8 of Directive 98/8/EC, the company ISP Cologne Holding GmbH submitted on 22 December 2010 an application to Denmark for authorisation of a wood preservative biocidal product containing IPBC (‘the contested product’).
V skladu s členom 8 Direktive 98/8/ES je podjetje ISP Cologne Holding GmbH 22. decembra 2010 pri pristojnih organih Danske vložilo vlogo za izdajo dovoljenja za pripravek za zaščito lesa, biocidni pripravek, ki vsebuje IPBC (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporni proizvod).
Denmark authorised the contested product on 19 December 2011 for Use classes 2 and 3 of the treated wood, as described in the Technical Notes for Guidance on Product Evaluation [4].
Danska je 19. decembra 2011 izdala dovoljenje za sporni proizvod za razreda uporabe 2 in 3 za obdelavo lesa, kot je opisano v tehničnih opombah s smernicami za oceno pripravkov (Technical Notes for Guidance on Product Evaluation) [4].
The product authorisation covers different application methods, including automated dipping for professional use.
Dovoljenje za proizvod zajema različne metode nanašanja, vključno z avtomatizirano potopitvijo za poklicno uporabo.
Two Member States have subsequently authorised the contested product through mutual recognition.
Dve državi članici sta posledično izdali dovoljenja za sporni proizvod na podlagi medsebojnega priznavanja.
ISP Cologne Holding GmbH (‘the applicant’) submitted on 20 February 2012 a complete application to Germany for mutual recognition of the authorisation of the contested product granted by Denmark.
Podjetje ISP Cologne Holding GmbH (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vlagatelj) je 20. februarja 2012 pri pristojnih organih Nemčije vložilo popolno vlogo za medsebojno priznanje dovoljenja za sporni proizvod, ki ga je izdala Danska.
Germany has notified the Commission, the other Member States and the applicant on 30 August 2013 of its proposal to restrict the authorisation in accordance with Article 4(4) of Directive 98/8/EC.
Nemčija je 30. avgusta 2013 obvestila Komisijo, druge države članice in vlagatelja o svojem predlogu za omejitev dovoljenja v skladu s členom 4(4) Direktive 98/8/ES.
Germany considers that the contested product does not meet the requirements of Article 5(1) of Directive 98/8/EC with regard to the human health and the environment.
Nemčija meni, da sporni proizvod ne izpolnjuje zahtev iz člena 5(1) Direktive 98/8/ES v zvezi z zdravjem človeka in okoljem.
According to Germany, the assessment performed by Denmark did not appropriately address the environmental concerns raised by the contested product.
Po navedbah Nemčije v oceni, ki jo je opravila Danska, niso bili ustrezno obravnavani okoljski pomisleki v zvezi s spornim proizvodom.
The environmental risk assessment performed by Germany of the service life of treated wood under Use Class 3 conditions concluded in an unacceptable risk for the soil compartment at day 30 (‘time 1’) regardless of the application method.
V oceni tveganja za okolje, ki jo je opravila Nemčija v zvezi z življenjsko dobo obdelanega lesa na podlagi pogojev razreda uporabe 3, je bilo ugotovljeno nesprejemljivo tveganje za tla na 30. dan (v nadaljnjem besedilu: čas 1) ne glede na metodo nanašanja.
As a result, Germany proposes not to authorise the use of wood treated with the contested product under Use class 3 conditions.
Posledično Nemčija predlaga, da se ne dovoli uporabe lesa, obdelanega s spornim proizvodom na podlagi pogojev razreda uporabe 3.
Germany also considers that the application by automated dipping should be limited to systems with a sufficiently high degree of automation due to unacceptable risks on the human health of professional users.
Poleg tega Nemčija meni, da bi bilo treba uporabo z avtomatizirano potopitvijo omejiti na sisteme z dovolj visoko stopnjo avtomatizacije zaradi nesprejemljivih tveganj za zdravje pri poklicnih uporabnikih.
The Commission invited the other Member States and the applicant to submit comments to the notification in writing within 90 days in accordance with Article 27(1) of Directive 98/8/EC.
Komisija je druge države članice in vlagatelja pozvala, naj v 90 dneh predložijo pisne pripombe na obvestilo v skladu s členom 27(1) Direktive 98/8/ES.
Comments were submitted within that deadline by Germany, Denmark and the applicant.
Nemčija, Danska in vlagatelj so pripombe predložili v navedenem roku.
The notification was also discussed between the Commission and Member States' Competent Authorities for biocidal products on 24 September 2013 in the meeting of the coordination group established under Article 35 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
O obvestilu so 24. septembra 2013 razpravljali tudi Komisija in pristojni organi držav članic za biocidne pripravke na sestanku koordinacijske skupine, ustanovljene s členom 35 Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012.
With regard to the risks for the environment, from those discussions and comments it follows that the evaluation carried out by Denmark is compatible with current guidance [5].
Glede tveganj za okolje je bilo na podlagi navedenih razprav in pripomb ugotovljeno, da je ocena, ki jo je opravila Danska, skladna s trenutnimi smernicami [5].
Where a risk is identified at time 1 as a result of a worst-case assumption, safe use of treated wood under Use classes 2 and 3 conditions can be assumed when the risk for the environment at the end of the service life is deemed acceptable.
Kjer je na podlagi najslabšega scenarija ugotovljeno tveganje v času 1, se lahko predvideva varna uporaba obdelanega lesa na podlagi pogojev razredov uporabe 2 in 3, kadar tveganje za okolje na koncu življenjske dobe velja za sprejemljivo.
The Commission also notes that cases where an unacceptable risk is identified at time 1 are currently under discussion at Union level in order to establish a harmonised approach.
Komisija ugotavlja tudi, da se o primerih, kjer je v času 1 ugotovljeno nesprejemljivo tveganje, trenutno razpravlja na ravni Unije, da bi se določil usklajen pristop.
Against this background the Commission considers that, until such an approach is formally adopted, the conclusions of the assessment of the contested product by the Denmark should be considered as valid until the renewal of the product authorisation.
Glede na navedeno Komisija meni, da do uradnega sprejetja takšnega pristopa ugotovitve ocene spornega proizvoda, ki jo je pripravila Danska, štejejo za veljavne do obnovitve dovoljenja za proizvod.
In the light of those comments, the Commission supports the conclusions of the evaluation carried out by Denmark and the other Member States having approved the product through mutual recognition, considering that the contested product fulfils the requirements set by Article 5(1) of Directive 98/8/EC with regard to the environment.
Z vidika navedenih pripomb Komisija podpira ugotovitve ocene, ki so jo izvedle Danska in druge države članice, ki so medsebojno odobrile proizvod, saj meni, da sporni proizvod izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 5(1) Direktive 98/8/ES v zvezi z okoljem.
The Commission therefore considers that the request by Germany to restrict the authorisation cannot be justified on the grounds put forward.
Zato Komisija meni, da zahtevka Nemčije za omejitev dovoljenja ni mogoče utemeljiti na podlagi predloženih razlogov.
With regard to the application by automated dipping, the Commission considers that the contested product should be subject to the provisions established by a previous Commission Decision [6] addressing the protection of the health of professional users when applying IPBC containing products by this application method.
Glede uporabe z avtomatizirano potopitvijo Komisija meni, da bi morale za sporni proizvod veljati določbe iz prejšnjega sklepa Komisije [6], v katerem je obravnavano varovanje zdravja poklicnih uporabnikov pri uporabi proizvodov, ki vsebujejo IPBC, s to metodo nanašanja.
Consequently, the contested product should be authorised subject to instructions on the label restricting the use to fully automated dipping processes and the product authorisation should be amended accordingly.
Zato bi bilo treba sporni proizvod odobriti, če se na etiketi objavijo navodila, ki uporabo omejujejo na postopek popolnoma avtomatizirane potopitve, dovoljenje za proizvod pa bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 applies to the contested product in accordance with the provisions of Article 92(2) of that Regulation.
Uredba (EU) št. 528/2012 se za sporni proizvod uporablja v skladu z določbami člena 92(2) navedene uredbe.
Since the legal basis for this Decision is Article 36(3) of that Regulation, this decision should be addressed to all Member States by virtue of Article 36(4) of that Regulation.
Ker je pravna podlaga za ta sklep člen 36(3) navedene uredbe, bi moral biti ta sklep naslovljen na vse države članice v smislu člena 36(4) navedene uredbe.
This Decision applies to products identified by the following application reference number in the Reference Member State, as provided for by the Register for Biocidal Products:
Ta sklep se uporablja za proizvode, ki imajo v referenčni državi članici naslednjo referenčno številko vloge, kakor je določena v registru biocidnih pripravkov:
The proposal by Germany to restrict the authorisation granted by Denmark on 19 December 2011 of the products referred to in the Article 1, is rejected.
Predlog Nemčije za omejitev dovoljenja, ki ga je Danska 19. decembra 2011 izdala za proizvode, navedene v Prilogi 1, se zavrne.
Where used for automated dipping, authorisations of biocidal products identified by the application reference number listed in Article 1 shall include a condition that the label of the products contains the following instruction:
Kadar se uporabljajo za avtomatizirano potopitev, dovoljenja za biocidne pripravke, ki imajo referenčno številko vloge iz člena 1, vključujejo pogoj, da mora etiketa pripravka vsebovati naslednja navodila:
Where appropriate, the wooden articles to be treated must be fully secured (e.g. via tension belts or clamping devices) prior to treatment and during the dipping process, and must not be manually handled until after the treated articles are surface dry.’
Po potrebi je treba lesene predmete, ki se obdelujejo, popolnoma zaščititi (npr. z elastičnimi pasovi ali pripravami za spajanje) pred obdelavo ali med postopkom potopitve in se z njimi ne sme ročno ravnati, dokler njihova površina ni suha.“
Commission Directive 2008/79/EC of 28 July 2008 amending Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to include IPBC as an active substance in Annex I thereto (OJ L 200, 29.7.2008, p. 12).
Direktiva Komisije 2008/79/ES z dne 28. julija 2008 o spremembi Direktive 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta za vključitev IPBC kot aktivne snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi (UL L 200, 29.7.2008, str. 12).
Available on the website http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/16960215/bpd_guid_tnsg-product-evaluation_en.pdf
Na voljo na spletišču http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/16960215/bpd_guid_tnsg-product-evaluation_en.pdf.
Report of leaching workshop (Arona, Italy, 13-14 June 2005), available on the website http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our_activities/public-health/risk_assessment_of_Biocides/doc/ESD/ESD_PT/PT_08/PT_8_Leaching_Workshop_2005.pdf/at_download/file
Poročilo z delavnice o luženju (Arona, Italija, 13.–14. junij 2005), na voljo na spletišču http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our_activities/public-health/risk_assessment_of_Biocides/doc/ESD/ESD_PT/PT_08/PT_8_Leaching_Workshop_2005.pdf/at_download/file.
rejecting the refusal of the authorisation of a biocidal product notified by Germany in accordance with Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
o zavrnitvi predloga za zavrnitev izdaje dovoljenja za biocidni pripravek, ki ga je Nemčija priglasila v skladu z Direktivo 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document C(2014) 7915)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 7915)
Annex I to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] contained the list of active substances approved at Union level for inclusion in biocidal products.
Priloga I k Direktivi 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] vsebuje seznam aktivnih snovi, ki so odobrene na ravni Unije za vključitev v biocidne pripravke.
Commission Directives 2008/78/EC [3], 2008/79/EC [4] and 2008/86/EC [5] added the active substances propiconazole, IPBC and tebuconazole, respectively, for use in products belonging to product-type 8, wood preservatives, as defined in Annex V to Directive 98/8/EC.
Z direktivami Komisije 2008/78/ES [3], 2008/79/ES [4] oziroma 2008/86/ES [5] so bile dodane aktivne snovi propikonazol, IPBC oziroma tebukonazol za uporabo v pripravkih, ki spadajo v 8. vrsto izdelkov, pripravki za zaščito lesa, kakor so opredeljeni v Prilogi V k Direktivi 98/8/ES.
By virtue of Article 86 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012, these substances are therefore approved active substances included in the list referred to in Article 9(2) of that Regulation.
V skladu s členom 86 Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 so te snovi torej odobrene aktivne snovi, vključene na seznam iz člena 9(2) navedene uredbe.
In accordance with Article 8 of Directive 98/8/EC, the company Arch Timber Protection Ltd submitted on 2 April 2010 an application to The United Kingdom for authorisation of a wood preservative biocidal product containing propiconazole, IPBC and tebuconazole (‘the contested product’).
V skladu s členom 8 Direktive 98/8/ES je podjetje Arch Timber Protection Ltd.
The United Kingdom authorised the contested product on 7 June 2012 for industrial use and temporary protection of freshly sawn/felled wood and unseasoned timber only, also indicating that wood treated with this product can be used for Use Classes 2 and 3 as described in the Technical Notes for Guidance on Product Evaluation [6].
2. aprila 2010 pri pristojnih organih Združenega kraljestva vložilo vlogo za izdajo dovoljenja za pripravek za zaščito lesa, biocidni pripravek, ki vsebuje propikonazol, IPBC in tebukonazol (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sporni proizvod).
The product consists of two packs to be mixed and diluted at industrial premises depending on site-specific application conditions by dipping or enclosed deluge.
Združeno kraljestvo je 7. junija 2012 izdalo dovoljenje za sporni proizvod samo za industrijsko uporabo in začasno zaščito sveže žaganega/posekanega in neposušenega lesa, pri čemer je tudi navedlo, da se lahko les, ki je obdelan s tem proizvodom, uporablja za razreda uporabe 2 in 3, kot sta opisana v tehničnih opombah s smernicami za oceno pripravkov (Technical Notes for Guidance on Product Evaluation) [6].
Ten Member States have subsequently authorised the contested product through mutual recognition.
Pripravek je sestavljen iz dveh pakiranj, katerih vsebina se zmeša in razredči v industrijskem objektu s postopkom potopitve ali zalitja, odvisno od pogojev uporabe, ki so specifični za določen objekt.
Arch Timber Protection Ltd (‘the applicant’) submitted on 16 July 2012 a complete application to Germany for mutual recognition of the authorisation of the contested product granted by the United Kingdom.
Deset držav članic je posledično izdalo dovoljenja za sporni proizvod na podlagi medsebojnega priznavanja.
Germany notified the Commission, the other Member States and the applicant on 19 August 2013 of its proposal to refuse the authorisation in accordance with Article 4(4) of Directive 98/8/EC.
Podjetje Arch Timber Protection Ltd. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vlagatelj) je 16. julija 2012 pri pristojnih organih Nemčije vložilo popolno vlogo za medsebojno priznanje dovoljenja za sporni proizvod, ki ga je izdalo Združeno kraljestvo.
Germany considered that the contested product does not meet the requirements of Article 5(1) of Directive 98/8/EC with regard to the environment.
Nemčija je 19. avgusta 2013 obvestila Komisijo, druge države članice in vlagatelja o svojem predlogu za zavrnitev izdaje dovoljenja v skladu s členom 4(4) Direktive 98/8/ES.
According to Germany, the authorisation did not reflect well that the product was intended for temporary wood protection and the product was not appropriately assessed by the United Kingdom in terms of environmental risks.
Nemčija je menila, da sporni proizvod ne izpolnjuje zahtev iz člena 5(1) Direktive 98/8/ES v zvezi z okoljem.
The assessment performed by Germany concluded in an unacceptable risk for the environment at day 30 following the application of the product (‘time 1’), which also raised concerns regarding the potential use of wood treated with the contested product under Use Classes 2 and 3 conditions.
Po navedbah Nemčije iz dovoljenja ni bilo dobro razvidno, da je proizvod namenjen začasni zaščiti lesa, poleg tega Združeno kraljestvo proizvoda ni ustrezno ocenilo glede okoljskih tveganj.