natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Administrative penalties (for other breaches of requirements imposed by Directive 2013/36/EU or Regulation (EU) No 575/2013)
javne izjave, v katerih sta opredeljeni odgovorna fizična/pravna oseba in narava kršitve [člen 67(2)(a)]
Total number of administrative penalties from Article 67(2) of Directive 2013/36/EU applied:
odredbe, ki od odgovorne fizične/pravne osebe zahtevajo, da preneha z ravnanjem in da tega ravnanja več ne ponovi [člen 67(2)(b)]
public statements identifying the natural/legal person responsible and the nature of the breach [Article 67(2)(a)]
odvzemi dovoljenja kreditni instituciji [člen 67(2)(c)]
orders requiring the natural/legal person responsible to cease the conduct and to desist from a repetition of that conduct [Article 67(2)(b)]
začasne prepovedi opravljanja funkcij v kreditnih institucijah za fizično osebo [člen 67(2)(d)]
withdrawals of authorisation of credit institution [Article 67(2)(c)]
upravne denarne kazni za pravno/fizično osebo [točke (e) do (g) člena 67(2)]
temporary bans against natural person from exercising functions in credit institutions [Article 67(2)(d)]
Število in vrsta drugih uporabljenih upravnih kazni (ki niso opredeljene v členu 67(2) Direktive 2013/36/EU)
administrative pecuniary penalties imposed on legal/natural person [points (e) to (g) of Article 67(2)]
upravne denarne kazni za pravno osebo [točke (c) do (e) člena 66(2)]
Number and nature of other administrative penalties applied (not specified in Article 67(2) of Directive 2013/36/EU)
preklic glasovalnih pravic delničarjev [člen 66 (2)(f)]
administrative pecuniary penalties imposed on a legal person [points (c) to (e) of Article 66(2)]
odvzemi dovoljenja investicijskim podjetjem [člen 67(2)(c)]
suspensions of the voting rights of shareholders [Article 66(2)(f)]
začasne prepovedi opravljanja funkcij v investicijskih podjetjih za fizično osebo [člen 67(2)(d)]
withdrawals of authorisation of investment firms [Article 67(2)(c)]
Podatki o opustitvah (leto 20XX)
temporary bans against natural person from exercising functions in investment firms [Article 67(2)(d)]
Izvzetje iz uporabe bonitetnih zahtev na posamični podlagi iz delov 2 do 5, 7 in 8 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013
Data on waivers (year 20XX)
Pravno sklicevanje v Uredbi (EU) št. 575/2013
Exemption from the application on an individual basis of prudential requirements set out in Parts Two to Five, Seven and Eight of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
(opustitve za podrejene družbe)
Legal reference in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
(opustitve za nadrejene institucije)
(waivers for subsidiaries)
Skupno število odobrenih opustitev
(waivers for parent institutions)
Število opustitev, odobrenih nadrejenim institucijam, ki imajo delež ali so udeležene v podrejenih družbah, ustanovljenih v tretjih državah
Total number of waivers granted
ni podatkov
Number of waivers granted to parent institutions with have or hold participations in subsidiaries established in third countries
Skupni znesek konsolidiranega kapitala v podrejenih družbah, ustanovljenih v tretjih državah (v milijonih EUR)
Percentage of the consolidated own funds requirements allocated to subsidiaries established in third countries (%)
Število dovoljenj, ki se nadrejenim institucijam izdajo za vključitev podrejenih družb, ustanovljenih v tretjih državah, v izračun njihove zahteve
Number of permissions granted to parent institutions to incorporarte subsidiaries established in third countries in the calculation of their requirement
Število opustitev, odobrenih v skladu s členom 8(1), če imajo vse institucije enotne likvidnostne podskupine dovoljenje v več državah članicah
Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 651/2014
declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty
o razglasitvi nekaterih vrst pomoči za združljive z notranjim trgom pri uporabi členov 107 in 108 Pogodbe
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 of 7 May 1998 on the application of Articles 92 and 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community to certain categories of horizontal State aid [1], and in particular Article 1(1)(a) and (b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 994/98 z dne 7. maja 1998 o uporabi členov 92 in 93 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za določene vrste horizontalne državne pomoči [1] ter zlasti člena 1(1)(a) in (b) Uredbe,
However, according to Article 109 of the Treaty, the Council may determine categories of aid that are exempted from this notification requirement.
Vendar lahko v skladu s členom 109 Pogodbe Svet določi vrste pomoči, ki so izvzete iz obveznosti priglasitve.
Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 empowers the Commission to declare, in accordance with Article 109 of the Treaty, that the following categories may, under certain conditions, be exempted from the notification requirement: aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), aid in favour of research and development, aid in favour of environmental protection, employment and training aid and aid that complies with the map approved by the Commission for each Member State for the grant of regional aid.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 994/98 je Komisija pooblaščena, da lahko v skladu s členom 109 Pogodbe razglasi, da so naslednje vrste pomoči pod določenimi pogoji izvzete iz obveznosti priglasitve: pomoč za mala in srednja podjetja („MSP“), pomoč v korist raziskav in razvoja, pomoč v korist varstva okolja, pomoč za zaposlovanje in usposabljanje ter pomoč, ki je v skladu s karto za dodeljevanje regionalne pomoči, ki jo Komisija odobri za vsako državo članico.
On that basis, the Commission adopted Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 [2].
Na tej podlagi je Komisija sprejela Uredbo (ES) št. 800/2008 [2].
On 22 July 2013 Regulation (EC) No 994/98 was amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 733/2013 of 22 July 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 994/98 on the application of Articles 92 and 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community to certain categories of horizontal State aid [4] to empower the Commission to extend the block exemption to new categories of aid, in respect of which clear compatibility conditions can be defined.
Pod pogojem, da se na podlagi zadostnih izkušenj dodatno oblikujejo operativna merila za izvzetje, ki bi zagotovila predhodno združljivost drugih vrst pomoči, namerava Komisija pregledati področje uporabe te uredbe, da bi vključila nekatere vrste pomoči s teh področij.
Such new categories of block exempted aid include: aid to make good the damage caused by certain natural disasters, social aid for transport for residents of remote regions, aid for broadband infrastructures, aid for innovation, aid for culture and heritage conservation, aid for sport and multifunctional recreational infrastructures.
Komisija zlasti predvideva, da bo do decembra 2015 oblikovala merila za pristaniško in letališko infrastrukturo.
Provided that sufficient case experience is further developed allowing the design of operational exemption criteria ensuring the ex-ante compatibility of other categories of aid, the Commission intends to review the scope of this Regulation with a view to including certain types of aid in those areas.
Komisija je s Sporočilom o posodobitvi področja državnih pomoči EU [5] začela širši pregled pravil o državni pomoči.
In particular, the Commission envisages developing criteria for port and airport infrastructure by December 2015.
Glavni cilji te posodobitve so: (i) dosežek trajnostne, pametne in vključujoče rasti na konkurenčnem notranjem trgu ter hkrati prispevanje k prizadevanjem držav članic za učinkovitejšo porabo javnih financ; (ii) osredotočanje predhodnega preverjanja ukrepov pomoči, ki ga izvaja Komisija, na primere pomoči z največjim vplivom na notranji trg, hkrati pa krepitev sodelovanja držav članic pri izvajanju pravil o državni pomoči; in (iii) racionaliziranje pravil ter zagotovitev hitrejšega, bolje obveščenega in verodostojnejšega sprejemanja odločitev na podlagi jasnih ekonomskih razlogov, skupnega pristopa in jasnih obveznosti.
With its Communication on EU State Aid Modernisation (SAM) [5], the Commission launched a wider review of the State aid rules.
Pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 800/2008 je osrednji element posodobitve področja državnih pomoči.
The main objectives of this modernisation are (i) to achieve sustainable, smart and inclusive growth in a competitive internal market, while contributing to Member State efforts towards a more efficient use of public finances, (ii) to focus Commission ex ante scrutiny of aid measures on cases with the biggest impact on the internal market, while strengthening Member State cooperation in State aid enforcement, and (iii) to streamline the rules and provide for faster, better informed and more robust decisions based on a clear economic rationale, a common approach and clear obligations.
Ta uredba bi morala omogočati boljše določanje prednostnih nalog izvrševanja ter večjo poenostavitev ter zagotoviti večjo preglednost, učinkovito ocenjevanje in nadzor skladnosti s pravili o državni pomoči na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Unije, pri tem pa ohraniti institucionalne pristojnosti Komisije in držav članic.
The review of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 constitutes a central element of SAM.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti ta uredba ne presega tega, kar je potrebno za uresničitev navedenih ciljev.
This Regulation should allow for better prioritisation of State aid enforcement activities, greater simplification and should enhance transparency, effective evaluation and the control of compliance with the State aid rules at national and Union levels, while preserving the institutional competences of the Commission and the Member States.
Zaradi izkušenj pri uporabi Uredbe (ES) št. 800/2008 je Komisija lahko bolje opredelila pogoje, pod katerimi se nekatere vrste pomoči lahko štejejo za združljive z notranjim trgom, in razširila področje uporabe skupinskih izjem.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
Izkušnje so tudi pokazale, da je treba okrepiti preglednost, spremljanje in pravilno oceno zelo velikih shem glede na njihov vpliv na konkurenco na notranjem trgu.
The Commission ' s experience in applying Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 has allowed it to better define the conditions under which certain categories of aid can be considered compatible with the internal market and to extend the scope of block exemptions.
Splošne pogoje za uporabo te uredbe bi bilo treba opredeliti na podlagi vrste skupnih načel, ki zagotavljajo, da je pomoč namenjena skupnemu interesu, ima jasen spodbuden učinek, je ustrezna in sorazmerna, povsem pregledno dodeljena, je predmet nadzornega mehanizma in rednega ocenjevanja ter ne škodi pogojem trgovanja v obsegu, ki je v nasprotju s skupnim interesom.
It also revealed the necessity to strengthen transparency, monitoring and proper evaluation of very large schemes in light of their effect on competition in the internal market.
Pomoč, ki izpolnjuje vse pogoje iz te uredbe, tako splošne pogoje kot pogoje za posamezne zadevne vrste pomoči, bi bilo treba izvzeti iz obveznosti priglasitve iz člena 108(3) Pogodbe.
The general conditions for the application of this Regulation should be defined on the basis of a set of common principles that ensure the aid serves a purpose of common interest, has a clear incentive effect, is appropriate and proportionate, is granted in full transparency and subject to a control mechanism and regular evaluation, and does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent that is contrary to the common interest.
Za državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe, ki je ta uredba ne vključuje, se še naprej uporablja obveznost priglasitve iz člena 108(3) Pogodbe.
Aid that fulfils all the conditions laid down in this Regulation both general and specific to the relevant categories of aid should be exempted from the notification obligation laid down in Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Ta uredba ne posega v možnost držav članic, da priglasijo pomoč, katere cilji ustrezajo ciljem, ki jih zajema ta uredba.
State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty not covered by this Regulation remains subject to the notification requirement of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Zaradi večje možnosti učinka velikih shem na trgovino in konkurenco, bi morale sheme pomoči, katerih povprečni letni proračun državne pomoči presega prag, temelječ na absolutni vrednosti, načeloma biti predmet ocene državne pomoči.
This Regulation is without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to notify aid the objectives of which correspond to objectives covered by this Regulation.
Vrednotenje bi moralo biti usmerjeno v preverjanje, ali so bile dosežene predpostavke in pogoji, ki so podlaga za združljivost sheme, kot tudi učinkovitost ukrepa pomoči glede na njegove splošne in posebne cilje, ter zagotoviti navedbe o učinku sheme na konkurenco in trgovino.
In view of the greater potential impact of large schemes on trade and competition, aid schemes with an average annual State aid budget exceeding a threshold based on an absolute value should in principle be subject to State aid evaluation.
Da bi se zagotovila enaka obravnava, je treba ocenjevanje državne pomoči izvesti na podlagi načrta ocenjevanja, ki ga odobri Komisija.
The evaluation should aim at verifying whether the assumptions and conditions underlying the compatibility of the scheme have been achieved, as well as the effectiveness of the aid measure in the light of its general and specific objectives and should provide indications on the impact of the scheme on competition and trade.
Čeprav bi bilo tak načrt običajno treba pripraviti ob oblikovanju sheme in odobriti pravočasno, da shema lahko začne veljati, to morda ni mogoče v vseh primerih.
In order to ensure equal treatment, State aid evaluation should be carried out on the basis of an evaluation plan approved by the Commission.
Da zato ne bi prišlo do zamude pri začetku njihove veljavnosti, se bo ta uredba uporabljala za take sheme največ šest mesecev.
While such plan should normally be drawn up at the moment of the design of the scheme and approved in time for the scheme to enter into force, this may not be possible in all cases.
Komisija se lahko odloči, da to obdobje podaljša na podlagi odobritve načrta ocenjevanja.
Therefore, in order not to delay their entry into force, this Regulation will apply to such schemes for a maximum period of six months.
V ta namen bi bilo treba načrt ocenjevanja priglasiti Komisiji v 20 delovnih dneh po začetku veljavnosti sheme.
The Commission may decide to extend this period, upon approval of the evaluation plan.
Komisija se lahko tudi izjemoma odloči, da ocena ni nujna glede na posebnosti primera.
To this end, the evaluation plan should be notified to the Commission within 20 working days following the entry into force of the scheme.
Komisija bi morala od države članice prejeti potrebne informacije, da bi lahko ocenila načrt ocenjevanja in zahtevala dodatne informacije brez nepotrebnega odlašanja, kar bi državi članici omogočilo, da dopolni manjkajoče elemente, da bi Komisija lahko sprejela odločitev.
The Commission can also exceptionally decide that an evaluation is not necessary given the specificities of the case.
Glede na novost tega postopka bo Komisija v ločenem dokumentu zagotovila podrobne smernice o postopku, ki se uporablja v obdobju šestih mesecev, predvidenih za odobritev načrta ocenjevanja, in ustrezne predloge, na podlagi katerih bo treba predložiti načrte ocenjevanja.
The Commission should receive from the Member State the necessary information to be able to carry out the assessment of the evaluation plan and request additional information without undue delay allowing the Member State to complete the missing elements for the Commission to take a decision.
Spremembe shem, ki so predmet ocenjevanja, razen preoblikovanja, ki ne morejo vplivati na združljivost sheme pomoči na podlagi te uredbe ali ne morejo znatno vplivati na vsebino odobrenega načrta ocenjevanja, bi bilo treba oceniti ob upoštevanju rezultatov takega ocenjevanja ter jih izključiti iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
In view of the novelty of this process, the Commission will provide, in a separate document, a detailed guidance on the procedure applicable during the 6 months period for the approval of the evaluation plan and the relevant templates through which the evaluation plans will have to be submitted.
Za spremembe, kot so povsem formalna preoblikovanja, upravna preoblikovanja ali spremembe, izvedene v okviru sofinanciranih ukrepov EU, načeloma ne bi smelo veljati, da znatno vplivajo na vsebino odobrenega načrta ocenjevanja.
Alterations of schemes subject to evaluation, other than modifications which cannot affect the compatibility of the aid scheme under this Regulation or cannot significantly affect the content of the approved evaluation plan, should be assessed taking account of the outcome of such evaluation and should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Ta uredba se ne bi smela uporabljati za pomoč, ki je odvisna od uporabe domačih proizvodov v breme uvoženih proizvodov, ali pomoč dejavnostim, povezanim z izvozom.
The alterations such as purely formal modifications, administrative modifications or alterations carried out within the framework of the EU co-financed measures should not, in principle, be considered as significantly affecting the content of the approved evaluation plan.
Zlasti se ta uredba ne bi smela uporabljati za pomoč, s katero se financirata vzpostavitev in delovanje distribucijske mreže v drugih državah.
This Regulation should not apply to aid contingent upon the use of domestic over imported products or aid to export-related activities.
Pomoč za kritje stroškov sodelovanja na sejmih, študija ali svetovalnih storitev, potrebnih za uvajanje novega ali obstoječega proizvoda na novem trgu v drugi državi članici ali tretji državi, se običajno ne šteje za pomoč dejavnostim, povezanim z izvozom.
In particular, it should not apply to aid financing the establishment and operation of a distribution network in other countries.
Načeloma bi se morala ta uredba uporabljati v večini gospodarskih sektorjev.
Aid towards the cost of participating in trade fairs or of studies or consultancy services needed for the launch of a new or existing product on a new market in another Member State or third country does not normally constitute aid to export-related activities.
Vendar bi moralo biti področje uporabe v nekaterih sektorjih, kot so ribištvo in akvakultura ter primarna kmetijska proizvodnja, omejeno glede na posebna pravila, ki se uporabljajo.
This Regulation should apply in principle across most sectors of the economy.
Ta uredba bi se morala uporabljati za predelavo in trženje kmetijskih proizvodov, če so izpolnjeni nekateri pogoji.
However, in some sectors, such as the fisheries and aquaculture sector and primary agricultural production, the scope should be limited in the light of the special rules applicable.
Za namene te uredbe se za predelavo ali trženje ne bi smele šteti niti dejavnosti na kmetiji, ki so potrebne za pripravo proizvoda za prvo prodajo, niti prva prodaja s strani primarnega proizvajalca prodajnemu posredniku ali predelovalcu niti vse dejavnosti priprave proizvoda za prvo prodajo.
This Regulation should apply to the processing and marketing of agricultural products, provided that certain conditions are met.
Ta uredba se ne bi smela uporabljati za pomoč za lažje zaprtje nekonkurenčnih premogovnikov, kar je predmet Sklepa Sveta 2010/787/EU z dne 10. decembra 2010 o državnih pomočeh za lažje zaprtje nekonkurenčnih premogovnikov.
For the purposes of this Regulation neither on-farm activities necessary for preparing a product for the first sale, nor the first sale by a primary producer to resellers or processors or any activity preparing a product for a first sale should be considered processing or marketing.
Uporabljati bi se morala za druge vrste pomoči v sektorju premogovništva, z izjemo regionalne pomoči.
This Regulation should not apply to aid to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines, which is dealt with by the Council Decision of 10 December 2010 on State aid to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines [6].
Komisija bi morala zagotoviti, da odobrena pomoč nima škodljivega vpliva na pogoje trgovanja, ki bi bili v nasprotju s skupnim interesom.
This Regulation should apply to other types of aid in the coal sector, with the exception of regional aid.
Zato bi bilo treba iz področja uporabe te uredbe izključiti pomoč, dodeljeno upravičencu, ki je naslovnik neporavnanega naloga za izterjavo zaradi predhodnega sklepa Komisije o razglasitvi pomoči za nezakonito in nezdružljivo z notranjim trgom, z izjemo sheme pomoči za povrnitev škode, ki so jo povzročile nekatere naravne nesreče.
The Commission should ensure that authorised aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent that is contrary to the common interest.
Zaradi zagotovitve pravne varnosti je primerno za opredelitev, da gre za podjetje v težavah za namene te uredbe, določiti ja sna merila, ki ne zahtevajo ocene vseh posebnosti stanja podjetja.
Aid granted to undertakings in difficulty should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation, since such aid should be assessed under the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty of 1 October 2004 [7] as prolonged by Commission communication conc erning the prolongation of the application of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty of 1 October 2004 [8] or their successor Guidelines, in order to avoid their circumvention, with the exception of aid schemes to make good the damage caused by certain natural disasters.
Zato bi morale države članice sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev skladnosti s to uredbo, vključno s skladnostjo individualnih pomoči, dodeljenih v okviru shem skupinskih izjem.
In order to provide legal certainty, it is appropriate to establish clear criteria that do not require an assessment of all the particularities of the situation of an undertaking to determine whether an undertaking is considered to be in difficulty for the purposes of this Regulation.
Zaradi velikega tveganja, da bo to negativno vplivalo na pogoje trgovanja, bi morala Komisija po priglasitvi oceniti velike zneske pomoči, dodeljene individualno ali kumulativno.
State aid enforcement is highly dependent on the cooperation of Member States.
Zato bi bilo treba za vsako vrsto pomoči določiti pragove, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te uredbe, in sicer na ravni, ki upošteva zadevno vrsto pomoči ter njen morebiten vpliv na pogoje trgovanja.
Therefore, Member States should take all necessary measures to ensure compliance with this Regulation, including compliance of individual aid granted under block-exempted schemes.
Vsako pomoč, katere znesek presega navedene pragove, bi bilo treba obvezno priglasiti v skladu s členom 108(3) Pogodbe.
Due to the high risk of adversely affecting trading conditions, large amounts of aid granted either individually or cumulatively should be assessed by the Commission upon notification.
Pragovi določeni v tej uredbi, se ne bi smeli zaobiti z umetno delitvijo shem ali projektov pomoči na več shem ali projektov pomoči, ki imajo podobne značilnosti, cilje ali upravičence.
Thresholds should therefore be set for each category of aid falling within the scope of this Regulation at a level which takes into account the category of aid concerned and its likely effect on trading conditions.
Zaradi preglednosti, enakega obravnavanja in učinkovitega spremljanja bi bilo treba to uredbo uporabljati le za pomoč, za katero je mogoče vnaprej in brez ocene tveganja natančno izračunati bruto ekvivalent nepovratnih sredstev (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pregledna pomoč).
Any aid granted above those thresholds should remain subject to the notification requirement of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Za nekatere posebne instrumente pomoči, kot so posojila, jamstva, davčni ukrepi, ukrepi financiranja tveganja in zlasti vračljivi predujmi, bi morala ta uredba opredeliti, pod kakšnimi pogoji se lahko obravnavajo kot pregledni.