natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is not clear what the GOC meant by the term ‘neutral’ but according to the plans, policy documents and laws cited in recital (102) above the development of the PV industry and its financial and other support seems to be amongst the needs of national economy in China.
Ni jasno, kaj je kitajska vlada mislila z izrazom „nevtralna“, vendar je iz načrtov, političnih dokumentov in zakonov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi (102), razvidno, da razvoj fotonapetostne industrije ter njegova finančna in druga podpora spadata med potrebe nacionalnega gospodarstva na Kitajskem.
In the context of the financial support encouraged and expressed in these documents it is clear that the banks shall support the companies belonging to the PV industry.
V zvezi s finančno podporo, ki jo ti dokumenti spodbujajo in izražajo, je jasno, da banke podpirajo družbe, ki spadajo v fotonapetostno industrijo.
Concerning the finding that the banks are subject to legal rules which require them to provide credit supports to encouraged projects for which the Commission relied on the wording of the State Council Decision No 40, the GOC claimed that ‘it is absolutely misplaced’ because the Decision does not state or indicate that the solar industry is an encouraged project.
V zvezi z ugotovitvijo, pri kateri se je Komisija oprla na besedilo Sklepa državnega sveta št. 40, in sicer, da za banke veljajo pravni predpisi, v skladu s katerimi morajo zagotoviti kreditno podporo spodbujanim projektom, je kitajska vlada trdila, da je ta ugotovitev „povsem napačna“, ker v sklepu ni navedeno ali nakazano, da je solarna industrija spodbujan projekt.
This claim is also incorrect.
Ta trditev je prav tako napačna.
From recital (399) above, it is clear that the solar industry belongs to the category of encouraged industries/ projects.
Iz uvodne izjave (399) je razvidno, da solarna industrija spada v kategorijo spodbujanih industrij in projektov.
The GOC made a similar claim concerning the Law of the PRC on Scientific and Technological Progress and the Commission's finding that it requires the banks to give priority to the development of high and new technology industries and that the sampled producers fall in the high-tech category.
Kitajska vlada je podobno trdila v zvezi z zakonom LRK o znanstvenem in tehnološkem napredku ter ugotovitvi Komisije, da ta zakon od bank zahteva, da dajo prednost razvoju visokotehnoloških industrij in industrij z novo tehnologijo, ter da vzorčeni proizvajalci spadajo v kategorijo visokotehnoloških industrij.
According to the GOC, the Commission did not make any legal analysis on the issue of whether the solar industry of modules and cells production described as high-tech industry falls within the scope of this law.
Glede na navedbe kitajske vlade Komisija ni pravno proučila vprašanja, ali solarna industrija, ki vključuje proizvodnjo modulov in celic in je opredeljena kot visokotehnološka industrija, spada v področje uporabe tega zakona.
The Commission made a clear link between the category high-tech industries and the solar industry producing modules and cells.
Komisija je ugotovila, da obstaja jasna povezava med kategorijo visokotehnoloških industrij in solarno industrijo, ki proizvaja module in celice.
This is explained in detail in recital (402) above.
To je podrobno pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (402).
The GOC claimed that the Commission statement that the state involvement in the Chinese financial sector is substantial and on-going is not supported by positive evidence.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da izjava Komisije, da je država še vedno bistveno vključena v kitajski finančni sektor, ni podprta s pozitivnimi dokazi.
The GOC contested the evidence cited by the Commission and claimed that the 2009 IMF report which highlights the lack of interest rate liberalisation is irrelevant because the interest rates have been completely liberalised in China.
Kitajska vlada je izpodbijala dokaze, ki jih je navedla Komisija, in trdila, da je poročilo Mednarodnega denarnega sklada za leto 2009, ki poudarja pomanjkanje liberalizacije obrestne mere, nepomembno, ker so bile obrestne mere na Kitajskem povsem liberalizirane.
The evidence on the file confirms that the interest rates liberalisation in China is not finished and this was also confirmed by the PBOC officials present during the verification visit.
Dokazi iz dokumenta potrjujejo, da liberalizacija obrestnih mer na Kitajskem ni končana, to pa so potrdili tudi uradniki LBK, ki so bili prisotni med preveritvenim obiskom.
In regards of the 2010 IMF Country Report referred to by the Commission the GOC claimed that the Commission completely disregarded IMF findings on financial sector liberalisation.
V zvezi s poročilom Mednarodnega denarnega sklada o posameznih državah iz leta 2010, na katerega se je sklicevala Komisija, je kitajska vlada trdila, da je Komisija povsem prezrla ugotovitve Mednarodnega denarnega sklada o liberalizaciji finančnega sektorja.
The Commission did not disregard any relevant findings of the IMF in this report which were relevant.
Komisija ni prezrla nobenih pomembnih ugotovitev Mednarodnega denarnega sklada v tem poročilu.
The IMF findings to which the GOC referred to in its comments are not contradicting any of the Commission's findings on the state involvement in the Chinese financial sector and certainly not in respect of the state ownership or loan and deposits interest rate policy.
Ugotovitve Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, na katere se je kitajska vlada sklicevala v svojih pripombah, ne nasprotujejo nobeni ugotovitvi Komisije glede vključenosti države v kitajski finančni sektor in zagotovo ne ugotovitvam v zvezi z državnim lastništvom ali politiko obrestnih mer za posojila in vloge.
The fact that the Report stated that progress has been made in recent years in developing a more market-based financial system in China does not mean that the Report said that there actually is a market-based financial system in China.
Dejstvo, da je v poročilu navedeno, da je bil na Kitajskem v zadnjih letih dosežen napredek pri razvoju bolj tržno usmerjenega finančnega sistema, ne pomeni, da poročilo trdi, da na Kitajskem dejansko obstaja tržno usmerjen finančni sistem.
With regard to the OECD surveys cited by the Commission, the GOC claimed that it cannot be concluded that banks do not operate independently in China on the basis ‘of one phrase to the exclusion of significant progress with regard to the liberalisation of the banking sector’.
Kitajska vlada je glede pregledov OECD, ki jih navaja Komisija, trdila, da na podlagi „enega stavka, ki izključuje znaten napredek v zvezi z liberalizacijo bančnega sektorja“, ni mogoče sklepati, da banke na Kitajskem ne delujejo samostojno.
Concerning this claim it must be noted that the Commission never made any conclusion on the basis of ‘one phrase’ but as demonstrated in the above text, on the basis of several documents compiled by independent international organisations.
V zvezi s to trditvijo je treba opozoriti, da Komisija ni nikoli sklepala na podlagi „enega stavka“, ampak, kot je prikazano v zgornjem besedilu, na podlagi več dokumentov, ki so jih pripravile neodvisne mednarodne organizacije.
The GOC claimed that the Commission's analysis concerning the public body determination ‘is completely flawed’ and its conclusion in recital (168) above is inconsistent with the WTO AB's interpretation of the term ‘public body’ in the US — Definitive Anti-dumping and countervailing duties on Certain Products for China.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da je analiza Komisije v zvezi z določitvijo javnega organa „povsem napačna“ in da njen sklep v uvodni izjavi (168) ni v skladu z razlago izraza „javni organ“, kot ga pritožbeni organ STO razlaga v poročilu ZDA – dokončne protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve na nekatere izdelke s Kitajske.
One exporting producer also claimed that the Commission's reasoning concerning public body determination is ‘legally erroneous’.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi trdil, da je sklepanje Komisije v zvezi z določitvijo javnega organa „pravno napačno“.
The GOC claimed that the Commission failed to establish that SOCBs posses, are vested with, and exercise governmental authority and that it has not established i) that the functions in question which are alleged to be performed by the SOCBs are those that are executed by a government in general, i.e. are governmental functions in the first place, ii) the common features which the SOCBs share with the government besides the shareholding which was also not established for all the SOCBs; and iii) that all the SOCBs posses the requisite governmental authority in order to be able to exercise it or were vested with the power to execute the governmental functions concerned.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da Komisija ni dokazala, da imajo poslovne banke v državni lasti pooblastilo vlade, ga izvajajo ali jim je zaupano, ter da ni dokazala, i) da zadevne funkcije, ki jih domnevno izvajajo poslovne državne banke, pomenijo funkcije, ki jih na splošno izvaja vlada, tj. da so v prvi vrsti vladne funkcije, ii) značilnosti, ki so skupne poslovnim državnim bankam in vladi, poleg lastništva delnic, ki tudi ni bilo ugotovljeno za vse poslovne banke v državni lasti, in iii) da imajo vse poslovne državne banke pooblastilo vlade, potrebno za njegovo dejansko izvajanje, ali da so pooblaščene za izvajanje zadevnih vladnih funkcij.
The Commission refers to its analysis of this issue in recitals (158) — (167).
Komisija se sklicuje na svojo proučitev tega vprašanja v uvodnih izjavah od (158) do (167).
Lending is mentioned in the subsidy definition under Article 3.1(a)(i) of the basic Regulation as a government function.
Dajanje posojil je v opredelitvi subvencije iz člena 3.1(a)(i) osnovne uredbe navedeno kot vladna funkcija.
In the present investigation SOCBs are instructed by a requirement, through plans and other policy documents, to promote certain sectors, including the PV sector.
V tej preiskavi se poslovnim bankam v državni lasti prek zahtev, načrtov in drugih dokumentov politike ukazuje, naj spodbujajo določene sektorje, vključno s fotonapetostnim sektorjem.
On the basis of facts available, it was also concluded that there is substantial government ownership of banks in China and that the government exercises meaningful control over the SOCBs.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev je bilo sklenjeno tudi, da obstaja obsežno vladno lastništvo v bankah na Kitajskem in da so poslovne banke v državni lasti pod bistvenim nadzorom vlade.
Since the GOC did not provide the requested information on the government ownership of all SOCB's in China, the Commission made its findings on the facts available.
Ker kitajska vlada ni zagotovila zahtevanih informacij o vladnem lastništvu vseh poslovnih bank v državni lasti na Kitajskem, je Komisija svoje ugotovitve utemeljila na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
Thus, the Commission concludes that the SOCBs act as an arm of government performing a public function in implementing the GOC's preferential lending policies to certain sectors.
Zato Komisija ugotavlja, da poslovne državne banke delujejo kot roka vlade, saj z izvajanjem politik LRK glede preferenčnega posojanja določenim sektorjem opravljajo javno funkcijo.
The GOC also claimed that the Commission failed to establish direction or entrustment of private banks in China and in particular that the Commission has not established that the GOC gave an explicit and affirmative delegation or command or responsibility or authority to the private banks and the SOCBs to provide preferential loans.
Kitajska vlada je trdila tudi, da Komisija ni dokazala zaupanja nalog ali ukazovanja zasebnim bankam na Kitajskem ter zlasti ni dokazala, da je kitajska vlada na zasebne banke in poslovne banke v državni lasti izrecno in pozitivno prenesla nalogo dajanja preferenčnih posojil ali jim to ukazala ali jim naložila odgovornost ali jih pooblastila za dajanje preferenčnih posojil.
As explained in recitals (170) — (173), there is a government policy in China to provide preferential lending support the PV industry.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah od (170) do (173), kitajska vlada izvaja politiko zagotavljanja podpore v obliki preferenčnih posojil fotonapetostni industriji.
Private banks are obliged to implement that government policy: The GOC through the Law on Commercial Banks instructed all banks in China to ‘carry out their loan business upon the needs of national economy and the social development and with the spirit of the state industrial policies’.
Zasebne banke so dolžne izvajati navedeno vladno politiko. Prek zakona o poslovnem bančništvu kitajska vlada vsem bankam nalaga, da „svojo posojilno dejavnost izvajajo v skladu s potrebami nacionalnega gospodarstva in družbenega razvoja ter v duhu industrijskih politik države“.
These needs and state industrial policies are, inter alia, set in various plans and policy documents and the provision of preferential financing to selected industries including the PV industry is one of them.
Te potrebe in industrijske politike države so med drugim določene v različnih načrtih in političnih dokumentih, ena izmed njih pa je zagotavljanje preferenčnega financiranja izbranim industrijam, vključno s fotonapetostno industrijo.
The GOC also claimed that the relevant Article of the Law on Commercial Banks has been extracted out of context and that it does not explicitly demonstrate any delegation or command, grant of responsibility or exercise of authority by the GOC on any commercial bank.
Kitajska vlada je trdila tudi, da je bil zadevni člen Zakona o komercialnih bankah upoštevan brez sobesedila in da ne dokazuje izrecno nobenega prenosa, ukaza ali naložitve odgovornosti s strani kitajske vlade ali izvajanja njenih pooblastil s strani poslovnih bank.
The Commission does not agree that the Article 34 has been taken out of context as already explained in recital (390) above and considers its wording a clear, legally binding instruction to all banks in China.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (390), se Komisija ne strinja, da se pri členu 34 ni upoštevalo sobesedilo, in meni, da je besedilo člena jasno, pravno zavezujoče navodilo za vse banke na Kitajskem.
The Commission also does not agree with the GOC's claim that the documents providing for the preferential lending to the PV industry referred to in recital (102) are ‘inadequate legal basis’.
Komisija se prav tako ne strinja s trditvijo kitajske vlade, da so dokumenti, ki določajo preferenčno posojanje fotonapetostni industriji in so navedeni v uvodni izjavi (102), „neustrezna pravna podlaga“.
This is explained in length in recitals (399) — (403) above.
To je obširno pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah od (399) do (403).
One exporting producer claimed that the Commission has not demonstrated foreign-owned banks in China are entrusted and directed by the GOC.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da Komisija ni dokazala, da kitajska vlada zaupa naloge in ukazuje bankam na Kitajskem, ki so v tujem lastništvu.
The Commission demonstrated entrustment and direction for all privately owned banks in China (inter alia recitals (169) — (172) and (424) above) and the banks with foreign ownership belong to this category.
Komisija je zaupanje nalog in ukazovanje dokazala za vse zasebne banke na Kitajskem (med drugim v uvodnih izjavah od (169) do (172) in (424)), banke v tujem lastništvu pa spadajo v to kategorijo.
In respect of the entrustment and direction determination the GOC also claimed that the Commission had made conclusions on the basis of credit risk assessment of one sampled exporter provided by one bank and applied them to all banks in China and thereby used adverse inferences in this regard.
V zvezi z določitvijo zaupanja nalog in ukazovanja je kitajska vlada trdila tudi, da je Komisija sklepala na podlagi ocene kreditnega tveganja enega vzorčenega izvoznika, ki jo je predložila ena banka, in za te sklepe štela, da veljajo za vse banke na Kitajskem, ter je tako uporabila negativne sklepe.
It is noted that the GOC as well as the banks refused to provide any other credit risk assessments of other sampled exporting producers.
Opozoriti je treba, da kitajska vlada in banke niso hotele predložiti ocen kreditnega tveganja drugih vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Since the Commission was forced to apply facts available in this regard and the credit risk assessment mentioned above is best facts available the Commission partly based its conclusions on this document.
Ker je bila Komisija prisiljena uporabiti razpoložljiva dejstva v zvezi s tem in ker navedena ocena kreditnega tveganja pomeni najboljša razpoložljiva dejstva, je Komisija svoje sklepe delno oprla na ta dokument.
But it is reiterated that the conclusions were made on the basis of facts available and not adverse inferences.
Vendar je treba ponovno poudariti, da sklepi temeljijo na razpoložljivih dejstvih in ne na negativnih sklepih.
The GOC objected to the Commission's assessment of the distortion of the Chinese financial market ‘as it is legally flawed’.
Kitajska vlada je nasprotovala oceni Komisije glede izkrivljanja kitajskega finančnega trga, ker „je pravno napačna“.
The GOC claimed that there is no evidence pertaining to the IP which would indicate that the SOCBs account for 2/3 of the Chinese financial market.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da ni dokazov, ki bi se nanašali na OP in kazali, da poslovne banke v državni lasti predstavljajo dve tretjini kitajskega finančnega trga.
In the absence of the information on the banking sector ownership which was repeatedly requested but not provided by the GOC the Commission applied fact available.
Komisija je uporabila razpoložljiva dejstva, ker ni imela informacij o lastništvu v bančnem sektorju, ki jih je večkrat zahtevala, vendar jih kitajska vlada ni zagotovila.
The Commission referred to the DB report in this respects which states that the SOCBs account for more than 2/3 of the Chinese financial market.
Komisija se je v zvezi s tem sklicevala na poročilo DB, v katerem je navedeno, da poslovne banke v državni lasti predstavljajo več kot dve tretjini kitajskega finančnega trga.
This is further corroborated by the evidence from the WTO, IMF, OECD and World Bank documents which confirm that the state presence in the Chinese banking sector had not significantly changed in the IP.
To dodatno podpirajo dokazi iz dokumentov STO, Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, OECD in Svetovne banke, ki potrjujejo, da se vključenost države v kitajski bančni sektor v OP ni pomembno spremenila.
The GOC also claimed that the Commission's statement concerning the interest rates (namely that the banks are bound to stay within the limits set by the PBOC)is incorrect because the floor lending rate has been completely abolished.
Kitajska vlada je poleg tega trdila, da je izjava Komisije, da morajo banke obrestne mere ohraniti v mejah, ki jih je določila LBK, napačna, saj je bila najnižja dovoljena posojilna obrestna mera povsem odpravljena.
It is true that the GOC in its comments claimed that the floor lending rates has been abolished in July 2013, but this is more than one year after the end of the IP.
Res je, da je kitajska vlada v svojih pripombah trdila, da je bila najnižja posojilna obrestna mera odpravljena julija 2013, vendar je to več kot eno leto po koncu OP.
It is also correct to say that the ceilings on the deposits rates are still in place.
Drži tudi, da se zgornje meje za obrestne mere za vloge še vedno uporabljajo.
Therefore the Commission's finding that the banks are not entirely free to decide the conditions of the loans (at least in regards to the IP) is correct and supported by the evidence on the file.
Zato je ugotovitev Komisije, da banke niso popolnoma svobodne pri odločanju o pogojih posojil (kar velja vsaj za OP), pravilna in podprta z dokazi iz dokumentacije.
The GOC also disputed the Commission's findings in recitals (183) — (188) on the basis of the alleged non-relevance of several plans, policy documents and laws cited by the Commission.
Kitajska vlada je izpodbijala tudi ugotovitve Komisije iz uvodnih izjav od (183) do (188) na podlagi domnevne nepomembnosti več načrtov, političnih dokumentov in zakonov, ki jih je navedla Komisija.
Commission does not agree with this claim and refers to the recitals (399) — (403) above where it explained why these documents are relevant for such findings.
Komisija se s to trditvijo ne strinja in se sklicuje na uvodne izjave od (399) do (403), v katerih je pojasnila, zakaj so ti dokumenti potrebni za takšne ugotovitve.
The GOC also stated that the Commission's finding that certain banks were granted access to the SAFE foreign exchange reserves is misplaced because the evidence to which the Commission referred only named EXIM Bank and CDB and explained that the loans sourced from these reserves are only given to state-owned enterprises.
Kitajska vlada je poleg tega navedla, da je ugotovitev Komisije, da je bil določenim bankam odobren dostop do državnih deviznih rezerv uprave za tuje borze, napačna, ker so se dokazi, ki jih je navedla Komisija, nanašali samo na Kitajsko izvozno-uvozno banko in Kitajsko razvojno banko, ter pojasnila, da se posojila iz teh rezerv dajejo samo podjetjem v državni lasti.
The evidence only states that when this program started it was initially available only to policy banks CDB and EXIM, but also mentions a major loan of the Bank of China, which indicates that the initial restriction has been removed.
Ta dokaz zgolj kaže, da je bil ta program, ko se je začel, najprej na voljo samo Kitajski izvozno-uvozni banki in Kitajski razvojni banki, ki sta banki za izvajanje politik, vendar omenja tudi veliko posojilo Banke Kitajske, ki kaže, da je bila prvotna omejitev ukinjena.
Also the claim that the evidence ‘clearly states that the loans are given to only state-owned enterprise like Sinopec’ is not accurate.
Tudi trditev, da dokazi „jasno kažejo, da se posojila dajejo le podjetjem v državni lasti, kot je Sinopec“, ni pravilna.
It actually stated that major state-owned enterprises are preferred, but does not indicate that the provision of such loans was limited to them.
Dokazi dejansko navajajo, da imajo velika podjetja v državni lasti prednost, vendar ne kažejo, da je dodeljevanje takšnih posojil omejeno na njih.
And in any event, given the size of the EXIM Bank and CDB and their impact on the financial market in China, even if the program was limited to them it would mean a significant distortion of the financial market as a whole.
V vsakem primeru pa bi glede na velikost Kitajske izvozno-uvozne banke in Kitajske razvojne banke ter njunega vpliva na kitajski finančni trg omejitev programa na ti dve banki pomenila znatno izkrivljanje finančnega trga kot celote.
The GOC also claimed that the Commission has not established specificity in regards of preferential lending and its specificity analysis is legally incoherent because it did not establish whether the Decision No 40 refers to projects or industries.
Kitajska vlada je poleg tega trdila, da Komisija ni ugotovila specifičnosti v zvezi s preferenčnimi posojili in da je njena analiza specifičnosti pravno neskladna, ker ni ugotovila, ali se Sklep št. 40 nanaša na projekte ali industrije.
According to the GOC the fact that the ‘extremely wide array of economic sectors and industries are covered by Decision No. 40, this document does not explicitly limit access of the alleged subsidy to certain enterprises as is required to be established by the WTO jurisprudence’.
Glede na navedbe kitajske vlade dejstvo, da „Sklep št. 40 zajema zelo širok nabor gospodarskih sektorjev in industrij, pomeni, da ta dokument ne omejuje izrecno dostopa do domnevne subvencije na določena podjetja, saj se mora določiti v skladu s sodno prakso STO“.
With respect to encouraged projects, it is recalled that these cover only certain activities within limited number of industrial sectors and thus this categorisation, covering only a subset of enterprises in China, cannot be considered as of a general nature and non-specific.
Glede spodbujanih projektov je treba opozoriti, da ti obsegajo samo določene dejavnosti iz omejenega števila industrijskih sektorjev in da zato te kategorizacije, ki obsega samo podmnožico družb na Kitajskem, ni mogoče šteti za kategorizacijo, ki je splošne narave in nespecifična.