natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 191(3)
ki izhajajo iz čezmejne uporabe primernega finančnega premoženja; in
Annex I
Člen 170
Section 7.1
Veljavno pravo in jurisdikcija
Annex I 1
v primeru konverzije pomeni tisto finančno premoženje, v katero je bilo finančno premoženje konvertirano;
Annex I 2
„datum prvega dela valutne zamenjave“ pomeni v zvezi s katero koli transakcijo datum in, kjer je primerno, čas na ta datum, ko je treba izvesti prenos zneska v eurih od ene stranke k drugi, tj. datum in, kjer je primerno, čas na ta datum, za katerega sta se stranki dogovorili, da bo potekala poravnava prenosa zneska v eurih;
Annex I 3
„datum drugega dela valutne zamenjave“ pomeni v zvezi s katero koli transakcijo datum in, kjer je primerno, čas na ta datum, ko mora ena stranka prenesti znesek v eurih nazaj drugi stranki.
Section 1.3.3, Section 7.2
PRILOGA V
Annex I 4
KRITERIJI ZA IZBOR NASPROTNIH STRANK ZA SODELOVANJE PRI POSEGIH NA DEVIZNEM TRGU
Annex I 5
Kriteriji, ki se nanašajo na načelo skrbnega in varnega poslovanja, so:
Annex I 6
Tabela 1
Section 7.2
CCBM je nasprotnim strankam za tržno in netržno finančno premoženje na voljo vsaj od 9.00 do 16.00 po srednjeevropskem času na vsak delovni dan sistema TARGET2.
Annex I 7
Nasprotna stranka, ki želi uporabiti CCBM, mora to sporočiti NCB, od katere želi dobiti posojilo, tj. svoji domači NCB, pred 16.00 po srednjeevropskem času.
Annex I 8
Puščica „Informacije o zavarovanju“ med nasprotno stranko A in NCB A je lahko v primeru nekaterih TPA nepomembna, odvisno od izbranega pogodbenega modela, in v takih primerih nasprotna stranka ne pošlje navodila NCB A oziroma od NCB A ne prejme potrditve.
Practice directions to parties concerning cases brought before the Court
Praktična navodila za stranke v zvezi z zadevami, predloženimi Sodišču
I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
I. SPLOŠNE DOLOČBE
The stages in the procedure before the Court and their essential characteristics
Faze postopka pred Sodiščem in njihove bistvene značilnosti
Representation of the parties before the Court
Zastopanje strank pred Sodiščem
Costs of proceedings before the Court and legal aid
Stroški postopka pred Sodiščem in brezplačna pravna pomoč
THE WRITTEN PART OF THE PROCEDURE
PISNI DEL POSTOPKA
The purpose of the written part of the procedure
Namen pisnega dela postopka
The written part of the procedure in references for a preliminary ruling
Pisni del postopka pri predhodnem odločanju
The written part of the procedure in direct actions
Pisni del postopka pri direktnih tožbah
The application
Tožba
The defence
Odgovor na tožbo
The reply and rejoinder
Replike in duplike
Request for an expedited procedure
Predlog za obravnavanje po hitrem postopku
Application for suspension of operation or for interim measures (Interim proceedings)
Predlog za odlog izvršitve ali izdajo drugih začasnih odredb (Postopek za izdajo začasne odredbe)
The written part of the procedure in appeals
Pisni del postopka pri pritožbah
The appeal
Pritožba
The response
Odgovor na pritožbo
The cross-appeal
Nasprotna pritožba
The response to the cross-appeal
Odgovor na nasprotno pritožbo
Appeals brought under Article 57 of the Statute
Pritožbe, vložene na podlagi člena 57 Statuta
Intervention in direct actions and appeals
Intervencija pri direktnih tožbah in pritožbah
The application to intervene
Predlog za intervencijo
The statement in intervention
Intervencijska vloga
Observations on the statement in intervention
Stališča glede intervencijske vloge
Applications to intervene made out of time
Prepozni predlogi za intervencijo
Intervention in the context of an application for interim measures or an expedited procedure
Intervencija v okviru predloga za izdajo začasne odredbe ali hitrega postopka
No intervention in preliminary rulings
Izključitev intervencije v postopku predhodnega odločanja
The form and structure of procedural documents
Oblika in zgradba procesnih aktov
The lodging and transmission of procedural documents
Vlaganje in posredovanje procesnih aktov
THE ORAL PART OF THE PROCEDURE
USTNI DEL POSTOPKA
The purpose of the hearing
Namen obravnave
The request for a hearing
Predlog, naj se opravi obravnava
The notice to attend the hearing and the need for a rapid answer to that notice
Vabilo na obravnavo in potreba po hitrem odgovoru na to vabilo
The steps to be taken with a view to the hearing
Ravnanje pred obravnavo
The normal procedure at a hearing
Običajen potek obravnave
The first stage of the hearing: oral submissions
Prvi del obravnave: ustne navedbe
The purpose of the oral submissions
Namen ustnih navedb
Speaking time and its possible extension
Čas za podajanje ustnih navedb in njegovo morebitno podaljšanje
The number of persons presenting oral argument
Število oseb, ki podajajo ustne navedbe
The second stage of the hearing: questions from members of the Court
Drugi del obravnave: vprašanja članov Sodišča
The third stage of the hearing: replies
Tretji del obravnave: replike
The implications and constraints of simultaneous interpretation
Vpliv in omejitve simultanega tolmačenja
The procedure following the hearing
Po obravnavi
THE COURT OF JUSTICE,
SODIŠČE,
Having regard to the Rules of Procedure of 25 September 2012 [1] and, in particular, Article 208 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Poslovnika z dne 25. septembra 2012 [1] in zlasti člena 208 tega poslovnika,
In the interests of the proper administration of justice and of making the Rules easier to understand, it is appropriate, therefore, to replace the practice directions relating to direct actions and appeals, adopted on the basis of the earlier Rules of Procedure, and to give the parties and their representatives practice directions based on the new Rules of Procedure that take into account, in particular, the experience gained in the course of their implementation.
Zato je treba za učinkovito izvajanje sodne oblasti in zaradi večje preglednosti praktična navodila v zvezi z neposrednimi tožbami in pritožbami, sprejeta na podlagi starega poslovnika, nadomestiti ter strankam in njihovim zastopnikom dati praktična navodila, ki temeljijo na novem poslovniku, pri čemer je treba upoštevati zlasti izkušnje, pridobljene pri uporabi Poslovnika.
These new directions, which apply to all categories of cases brought before the Court, are not intended to replace the relevant provisions of the Statute and of the Rules of Procedure.
Nova navodila, ki se uporabljajo za vse vrste zadev, predloženih Sodišču, ne nadomeščajo veljavnih določb Statuta in Poslovnika.
Their purpose is to afford the parties and their representatives a better understanding of the implications of those provisions and to outline in greater detail the conduct of proceedings before the Court and, in particular, the constraints on the Court, particularly those associated with the processing and translation of procedural documents or the simultaneous interpretation of the observations submitted in the course of a hearing.
Njihov cilj je strankam in njihovim zastopnikom omogočiti boljše razumevanje pomena teh določb ter natančneje predstaviti potek postopka pred Sodiščem in, med drugim, omejitve, ki veljajo zanj, zlasti tiste, ki so povezane z obdelavo in prevajanjem procesnih aktov ter simultanim tolmačenjem stališč, predstavljenih na obravnavi.
In a context notable, on the one hand, for a constant increase in the number of cases brought before the Court and, on the other hand, for the growing complexity of their subject-matter, observing and taking into account these directions constitutes, both for the parties and for the Court, the best guarantee that the latter will be able to deal with cases with the greatest efficiency.
Glede na to, da število zadev, predloženih Sodišču, nenehno narašča in da so obravnavane zadeve čedalje bolj zapletene, sta spoštovanje in upoštevanje teh navodil namreč za stranke in Sodišče najboljše jamstvo, da bo Sodišče zadeve obravnavalo optimalno.
In the interests of clarification, it is also necessary to incorporate into these new directions certain provisions of a rather more practical nature — which have until now been included in the Notes for the guidance of Counsel, the Instructions to the Registrar of the Court or letters of notice to attend a hearing — relating to the lodging and service of procedural documents and to the actual conduct of the oral part of the procedure,
Zaradi jasnosti je treba poleg tega v nova navodila vključiti nekatere bolj praktične določbe – ki so bile doslej vključene v priročnik za svetovalce, navodila sodnemu tajniku Sodišča ali vabila na obravnavo – v zvezi z vlaganjem in vročanjem procesnih aktov ter konkretnim potekom ustnega dela postopka,
HEREBY ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING PRACTICE DIRECTIONS:
SPREJME TA PRAKTIČNA NAVODILA:
Subject to special provisions laid down in the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘the Statute’) or in the Rules of Procedure, the procedure before the Court is to consist, as a general rule, of a written part and an oral part.
Postopek pred Sodiščem praviloma obsega pisni in ustni del, razen če je v posebnih določbah Protokola o Statutu Sodišča Evropske unije (v nadaljevanju: Statut) ali Poslovnika določeno drugače.
The purpose of the written part of the procedure is to put before the Court the claims, pleas and arguments of the parties to the proceedings or, in preliminary rulings, the observations which the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute intend to submit concerning the questions put by the courts and tribunals of the Member States of the European Union.
Cilj pisnega dela postopka je Sodišču predstaviti očitke, tožbene razloge in trditve strank v postopku, v postopku predhodnega odločanja pa stališča zainteresiranih subjektov iz člena 23 Statuta glede vprašanj, ki so jih postavila sodišča držav članic Unije.
The oral part, which follows it, is intended for its part to allow the Court to complete its knowledge of the case by the possible hearing of submissions from those parties or interested persons at a hearing and, if appropriate, by hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General.
Ustni del postopka, ki sledi pisnemu, pa Sodišču omogoča, da poglobi svoje poznavanje zadeve z morebitnim zaslišanjem teh strank ali zainteresiranih subjektov na obravnavi in, če je tak primer, s poslušanjem sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca.
In accordance with Article 19 of the Statute, parties to proceedings before the Court must be represented by a person who is duly authorised to represent them.
V skladu z določbami člena 19 Statuta mora stranke postopka pred Sodiščem zastopati oseba, ki je za to upravičena.
With the exception of the Member States, other States which are parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), the European Free Trade Association (‘EFTA’) Surveillance Authority and the institutions of the European Union, which are to be represented by an agent appointed for each case, other parties to the proceedings must be represented by a lawyer authorised to practise before a court of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the EEA Agreement.
Z izjemo držav članic, drugih držav podpisnic Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru (v nadaljevanju: Sporazum EGP), Nadzornega organa Evropskega združenja za prosto trgovino (v nadaljevanju: EFTA) in institucij Unije, ki jih zastopa agent, ki je imenovan za vsako zadevo posebej, mora druge stranke v postopku zastopati odvetnik, ki je vpisan v imenik odvetnikov v eni od držav članic ali drugi državi, ki je podpisnica Sporazuma EGP.
The evidence of that capacity must be capable of being produced, on request, at any stage of the proceedings.
Dokaz o tem vpisu je treba na zahtevo predložiti v kateri koli fazi postopka.
University teachers who are nationals of a Member State whose law accords them a right of audience are treated as lawyers by virtue of the seventh paragraph of Article 19 of the Statute.
Univerzitetni profesorji države članice, katere zakonodaja jim priznava pravico zastopanja na sodišču, so po členu 19, sedmi odstavek, Statuta izenačeni z odvetniki.
In preliminary ruling proceedings, the Court is to take account, so far as concerns the representation of the parties to the main proceedings, of the procedural rules applicable in the court or tribunal which made the reference.
V postopkih predhodnega odločanja pa Sodišče glede zastopanja strank v sporu o glavni stvari upošteva postopkovna pravila, ki se uporabljajo pred sodiščem, ki mu je predložilo zadevo v odločanje.
Any person empowered to represent a party before that court or tribunal may therefore also represent him before the Court of Justice and, if the national procedural rules do not require parties to be represented, the parties to the main proceedings are entitled to submit their own written and oral observations.
Vsakdo, ki je pooblaščen za zastopanje stranke pred tem sodiščem, lahko to stranko zastopa tudi pred Sodiščem, in če nacionalna postopkovna pravila ne zahtevajo zastopanja, lahko stranke v sporu o glavni stvari same podajo pisna in ustna stališča.
In the event of uncertainty in this respect, the Court may, at any time, request those parties, their representatives or the court or tribunal which made the reference to provide the relevant information.
V dvomu o tem lahko Sodišče kadar koli pridobi upoštevne informacije od teh strank, njihovih zastopnikov ali od sodišča, ki mu je zadevo predložilo v odločanje.
The persons called upon to present oral argument before the Court, irrespective of their qualifications or the capacity in which they are called upon, are required to wear gowns.
Osebe, ki nastopajo na Sodišču, morajo nositi togo, ne glede na njihov naziv in vlogo.
Where a hearing is organised, agents and lawyers taking part in that hearing are therefore requested to provide their own gowns; the Court has a number of plain gowns available for parties or representatives who have none.
Kadar se opravi obravnava, naj zato agenti in odvetniki, ki na njej sodelujejo, prinesejo svojo togo; Sodišče ima nekaj tog, ki so na voljo strankam ali zastopnikom, ki svoje nimajo.
Subject to the provisions set out in Article 143 of the Rules of Procedure, proceedings before the Court are to be free of charge, no charge or tax being payable to that latter on account of the initiation of proceedings or the lodging of a procedural document.
Postopek na Sodišču je, razen če člen 143 Poslovnika določa drugače, brezplačen, saj zaradi vložitve tožbe ali procesnega akta Sodišču ni treba plačati nikakršne dajatve ali takse.
The costs referred to in Article 137 et seq. of the Rules of Procedure include only ‘recoverable’ costs, that is, any sums payable to witnesses and experts, and expenses necessarily incurred by the parties for the purpose of the proceedings before the Court, in connection with the remuneration of their representative and the expenses of his travel to and subsistence in Luxembourg, if a hearing is organised.
Stroški iz člena 137 in naslednjih Poslovnika obsegajo samo stroške, ki se lahko povrnejo, torej zneske, ki se morda izplačajo pričam in izvedencem, in nujne izdatke, ki jih imajo stranke zaradi postopka, predvsem nagrado zastopnikov ter njihove potne stroške in dnevnice za bivanje v Luxembourgu, če se opravi obravnava.
The Court rules on the amount of those costs and the party ordered to pay them in the judgment or order which closes the proceedings, whereas in preliminary rulings it is for the referring court or tribunal to rule on the costs of the proceedings.
Sodišče o stroških in njihovi višini odloči v končni sodbi ali sklepu, medtem ko v postopku predhodnega odločanja o stroških postopka odloči predložitveno sodišče.
A party or, in preliminary ruling proceedings, a party to the main proceedings who is wholly or partly unable to meet the costs of the proceedings before the Court may, at any time, apply for legal aid under the conditions provided for, respectively, in Articles 115 to 118 and 185 to 189 of the Rules of Procedure.
Če stranka ali v postopkih predhodnega odločanja stranka v sporu o glavni stvari ne zmore plačati stroškov ali dela stroškov postopka, lahko kadar koli zaprosi za brezplačno pravno pomoč pod pogoji, ki so določeni v členih od 115 do 118 in od 185 do 189 Poslovnika.
In order for it to be possible for such applications to be considered, they must however be accompanied by all the information and supporting documents necessary to enable the Court to assess the legal aid applicant’s true financial situation.
Da bi bilo mogoče te prošnje upoštevati, jim morajo biti priloženi potrebni podatki in potrdila, ki Sodišču omogočajo, da ugotovi dejansko premoženjsko stanje prosilca.
Since, in preliminary rulings, the Court gives its ruling at the request of a court or tribunal of a Member State, the parties to the main proceedings must, first of all, apply for any legal aid from that court or tribunal or the competent authorities of the Member State concerned, the aid granted by the Court being only subsidiary to the aid granted at national level.
Ker Sodišče v postopkih predhodnega odločanja odloča na predlog sodišča države članice, morajo stranke v sporu o glavni stvari najprej zaprositi za morebitno brezplačno pravno pomoč pri sodišču ali pristojnem organu zadevne države članice, saj je pomoč, ki jo odobri Sodišče, le subsidiarna pomoči, odobreni na nacionalni ravni.
It is worth noting that, where it grants the application for legal aid, the Court is responsible, where applicable within the limits set by the formation of the Court, solely for costs involved in the assistance and representation before the Court of the applicant for legal aid.
Opozoriti je treba, da Sodišče, če ugodi prošnji za brezplačno pravno pomoč, prevzame samo stroške v zvezi s pomočjo in zastopanjem prosilca pred Sodiščem, po potrebi v mejah, ki jih določi sestava.
In accordance with the rules set out in the Rules of Procedure, those costs can be recovered subsequently by the Court in the decision ending the proceedings and ruling on costs, and the formation of the Court which gave a decision on the application for legal aid may, moreover, withdraw that legal aid at any time if the circumstances which led to its being granted alter during the proceedings.
V skladu s pravili iz Poslovnika lahko Sodišče pozneje zahteva vračilo teh stroškov v odločbi, s katero se postopek konča in je odločeno o stroških, sestava, ki je odločala o prošnji za brezplačno pravno pomoč, pa lahko poleg tega to kadar koli odvzame, če se okoliščine, ki so bile podlaga za njeno odobritev, med postopkom spremenijo.
Where a party considers it necessary that its identity or certain information concerning it should not be disclosed in a case brought before the Court, it may request that the Court ‘anonymise’ the relevant case, in whole or in part.
Če stranka meni, da njena identiteta ali podatki v zvezi z njo ne smejo biti razkriti v postopku pred Sodiščem, lahko temu predlaga, naj po potrebi zagotovi popolno ali delno anonimnost zadeve.
To be effective, such an application must, however, be made as early as possible.
Da pa bi bil ta predlog učinkovit, ga je treba podati čim prej.
On account of the increasing use of new information and communication technologies, granting anonymity becomes much more difficult if the notice of the case concerned has already been published in the Official Journal of the European Union or, in preliminary ruling proceedings, if the request for a preliminary ruling has already been served on the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute, about one month after the request has been lodged at the Court.
Zaradi naraščajoče rabe nove informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije je namreč veliko težje zagotoviti anonimnost, če je bilo obvestilo v zvezi z zadevo že objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije ali če je bil v postopku predhodnega odločanja predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe že vročen zainteresiranim subjektom iz člena 23 Statuta, približno mesec dni po vložitvi predloga pri Sodišču.
The written part of the procedure plays an essential role in the Court’s understanding of the case in so far as it must allow the Court, by reading the written pleadings or observations lodged, to acquire a detailed and accurate idea of the subject-matter of the case before it and the issues raised by that case.
Pisni del postopka je bistven za razumevanje zadeve s strani Sodišča, ker mu mora omogočiti, da si z branjem predloženih vlog in stališč ustvari jasno sliko o predmetu zadeve, ki mu je predložena, in o njenem pomenu.
Although this is the Court’s objective when dealing with any case brought before it, the conduct and the pattern of the written part of the procedure differ depending on the nature of the action.
Čeprav je ta cilj skupen obravnavanju vseh zadev, ki so predložene sodišču, se potek in glavne poteze pisnega dela postopka razlikujejo glede na vrsto pravnega sredstva.
Whereas in direct actions or appeals the parties are requested to adopt a position on the written pleadings lodged by the other parties to the proceedings, the written part of the procedure in preliminary rulings is characterised by the absence of adversarial proceedings, the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute being merely requested to submit any observations they may make on the questions referred by a national court or tribunal, without as a general rule knowing the position adopted by the other interested persons on those questions.
Medtem ko so stranke v postopkih z direktno tožbo ali pritožbo pozvane, naj zavzamejo stališče o vlogah, ki so jih predložile druge stranke v postopku, je za pisni del postopka predhodnega odločanja značilno, da ni kontradiktornosti, saj so zainteresirani subjekti iz člena 23 Statuta pozvani le k predložitvi morebitnih stališč o vprašanjih, ki jih je postavilo nacionalno sodišče, ne da bi bili načeloma seznanjeni s stališči drugih zainteresiranih subjektov glede teh vprašanj.
This gives rise to different requirements as regards both the form and length of those observations and also the subsequent conduct of the procedure.
Posledica so različne zahteve tako glede oblike in dolžine navedenih stališč kot glede nadaljnjega poteka postopka.
On account of the non-adversarial nature of preliminary ruling proceedings, the lodging of written observations by the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute does not involve any specific formalities.
Ker postopek predhodnega odločanja nima narave spora, niso na predložitev pisnih stališč zainteresiranih subjektov iz člena 23 Statuta vezane nobene posebne formalnosti.
Where a request for a preliminary ruling is served on them by the Court, those persons may thus submit, if they wish, written observations in which they set out their point of view on the request made by the referring court or tribunal.
Ti subjekti lahko, ko jim Sodišče vroči predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, če želijo, predložijo vlogo, v kateri predstavijo svoje stališče glede predloga, ki ga je vložilo predložitveno sodišče.
The purpose of those observations — which must be lodged within a time-limit of two months from service of the request for a preliminary ruling (extended on account of distance by a single period of 10 days) that cannot otherwise be extended — is to help clarify for the Court the scope of that request, and above all the answers to be provided to the questions referred by the referring court or tribunal.
Namen te vloge, ki mora biti vložena v nepodaljšljivem roku dveh mesecev od vročitve predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe (ki se mu prišteje enkratno obdobje desetih dni zaradi oddaljenosti), je Sodišču pojasniti predmet tega predloga, predvsem pa odgovore, ki naj bi jih bilo treba podati na vprašanja predložitvenega sodišča.
Although the statement must be complete and include, in particular, the arguments on which the Court may base its answer to the questions referred, it is not necessary, on the other hand, to repeat the factual and legal background of the dispute set out in the order for reference, unless it requires further comment.
Čeprav mora biti ta predstavitev celovita in mora vsebovati zlasti utemeljitev, na katero bi se Sodišče lahko oprlo pri odgovoru na postavljena vprašanja, ni treba ponavljati pravnega ali dejanskega okvira spora, navedenega v predložitveni odločbi, razen če so v zvezi s tem potrebna dodatna pojasnila.