natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where several contracting authorities are jointly conducting a procurement procedure, they should be jointly responsible for fulfilling their obligations under this Directive.
Če več javnih naročnikov skupaj izvaja postopek javnega naročanja, bi morali biti skupno odgovorni za izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti v skladu s to direktivo.
However, where only parts of the procurement procedure are jointly conducted by the contracting authorities, joint responsibility should apply only to those parts of the procedure that have been carried out together.
Kadar javni naročniki skupaj izvajajo le dele postopka javnega naročanja, bi morala skupna odgovornost veljati le za tiste dele postopka, ki se izvajajo skupaj.
Each contracting authority should be solely responsible in respect of procedures or parts of procedures it conducts on its own, such as the awarding of a contract, the conclusion of a framework agreement, the operation of a dynamic purchasing system, the reopening of competition under a framework agreement or the determination of which of the economic operators party to a framework agreement shall perform a given task.
Vsak javni naročnik bi moral biti izključno odgovoren za postopke ali dele postopkov, ki jih izvaja sam, na primer oddajo javnega naročila, sklenitev okvirnega sporazuma, upravljanje dinamičnega nabavnega sistema, ponovno odprtje konkurence v skladu z okvirnim sporazumom ali določitev gospodarskih subjektov, podpisnikov okvirnega sporazuma, ki naj izvajajo neko nalogo.
Electronic means of communication are particularly well suited to supporting centralised purchasing practices and tools because of the possibility they offer to re-use and automatically process data and to minimise information and transaction costs.
Elektronska komunikacijska sredstva so posebej ustrezna za podporo centraliziranih nabavnih praks in orodij, saj nudijo možnost ponovne uporabe in avtomatske obdelave podatkov ter znižanja informacijskih in transakcijskih stroškov.
The use of such electronic means of communication should therefore, as a first step, be rendered compulsory for central purchasing bodies, while also facilitating converging practices across the Union.
Najprej bi bilo treba obvezno uporabo takih elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev naložiti osrednjim nabavnim organom, hkrati pa tudi spodbujati usklajenost praks po vsej Uniji.
This should be followed by a general obligation to use electronic means of communication in all procurement procedures after a transition period of 30 months.
Temu bi morala po prehodnem obdobju 30 mesecev slediti uvedba splošne obveznosti uporabe elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev v vseh postopkih javnega naročanja.
Joint awarding of public contracts by contracting authorities from different Member States currently encounters specific legal difficulties concerning conflicts of national laws.
V zvezi s skupnim oddajanjem javnih naročil s strani javnih naročnikov iz različnih držav članic se trenutno pojavljajo specifične pravne težave v zvezi s kolizijo nacionalnih zakonodaj.
Despite the fact that Directive 2004/18/EC implicitly allowed for cross-border joint public procurement, contracting authorities are still facing considerable legal and practical difficulties in purchasing from central purchasing bodies in other Member States or jointly awarding public contracts.
Kljub temu, da Direktiva 2004/18/ES skupno čezmejno javno naročanje implicitno dovoljuje, pa se javni naročniki še vedno soočajo z znatnimi pravnimi in praktičnimi težavami pri javnem naročanju pri osrednjih nabavnih organih v drugih državah članicah ali pri skupni oddaji javnih naročil.
In order to allow contracting authorities to derive maximum benefit from the potential of the internal market in terms of economies of scale and risk-benefit sharing, not least for innovative projects involving a greater amount of risk than reasonably bearable by a single contracting authority, those difficulties should be remedied.
Te težave bi bilo treba odpraviti, da bi javnim naročnikom omogočili, da kar najbolj izkoristijo potencial notranjega trga glede ekonomije obsega in delitve tveganja, nenazadnje pri inovativnih projektih z večjo stopnjo tveganja, kot jo lahko razumno prenese en sam javni naročnik.
Therefore new rules on cross-border joint procurement should be established in order to facilitate cooperation between contracting authorities and enhancing the benefits of the internal market by creating cross-border business opportunities for suppliers and service providers.
Zato bi bilo treba oblikovati nova pravila o skupnem čezmejnem javnem naročanju, s katerimi bi olajšali sodelovanje med javnimi naročniki ter povečali koristi notranjega trga z ustvarjanjem čezmejnih poslovnih priložnosti za dobavitelje in izvajalce storitev.
Those rules should determine the conditions for cross-border utilisation of central purchasing bodies and designate the applicable public procurement legislation, including the applicable legislation on remedies, in cases of cross-border joint procedures, complementing the conflict of law rules of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council [13].
Ta pravila bi morala določati pogoje za čezmejno uporabo osrednjih nabavnih organov in opredeliti veljavno zakonodajo o javnem naročanju, vključno z veljavno zakonodajo o pravnih sredstvih, v primerih čezmejnih skupnih postopkov, ki bi dopolnjevala kolizijska pravila iz Uredbe (ES) št. 593/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13].
In addition, contracting authorities from different Member States should be able to set up joint entities established under national or Union law.
Poleg tega bi morali javni naročniki iz različnih držav članic na podlagi nacionalnega prava ali prava Unije imeti možnost, da ustanovijo skupne subjekte.
Specific rules should be established for such forms of joint procurement.
Za takšno obliko skupnega javnega naročanja bi bilo treba določiti posebna pravila.
However, contracting authorities should not make use of the possibilities for cross-border joint procurement for the purpose of circumventing mandatory public law rules, in conformity with Union law, which are applicable to them in the Member State where they are located.
Vendar javni naročniki ne bi smeli izkoriščati možnosti skupnega čezmejnega javnega naročanja za obid obveznih pravil javnega prava, skladnim s pravom Unije, ki se zanje uporabljajo v državi članici, v kateri se nahajajo.
Such rules might include, for example, provisions on transparency and access to documents or specific requirements for the traceability of sensitive supplies.
Taka pravila bi lahko denimo zajemala določbe o transparentnosti in dostopu do dokumentov ali posebne zahteve glede sledljivosti občutljivega blaga.
The technical specifications drawn up by public purchasers need to allow public procurement to be open to competition as well as to achieve objectives of sustainability.
Tehnične specifikacije, ki jih pripravijo javni naročniki, morajo omogočati odprtost javnih naročil konkurenci in zmožnost doseganja ciljev glede trajnosti.
To that end, it should be possible to submit tenders that reflect the diversity of technical solutions standards and technical specifications in the marketplace, including those drawn up on the basis of performance criteria linked to the life cycle and the sustainability of the production process of the works, supplies and services.
Zato bi bilo treba omogočiti predložitev ponudb, ki omogočajo različne tehnične rešitve, standarde in tehnične specifikacije na trgu, tudi tiste, oblikovane na podlagi kriterijev uspešnosti, povezanih z življenjsko dobo in trajnostjo proizvodnega procesa gradenj, blaga in storitev.
Consequently, technical specifications should be drafted in such a way as to avoid artificially narrowing down competition through requirements that favour a specific economic operator by mirroring key characteristics of the supplies, services or works habitually offered by that economic operator.
Glede na to bi bilo treba tehnične specifikacije pripraviti tako, da se prepreči umetno omejevanje konkurence z zahtevami, ki dajejo prednost določenemu gospodarskemu subjektu z navajanjem ključnih značilnosti blaga, storitev ali gradenj, ki jih ponavadi zagotavlja ta gospodarski subjekt.
Drawing up the technical specifications in terms of functional and performance requirements generally allows that objective to be achieved in the best way possible.
Tehnične specifikacije, pripravljene v smislu zahtev po funkcionalnosti in delovanju, na splošno omogočajo izpolnitev navedenega cilja na najboljši možni način.
Functional and performance-related requirements are also appropriate means to favour innovation in public procurement and should be used as widely as possible.
Zahteve po funkcionalnosti in delovanju so tudi ustrezen način za spodbujanje inovacij v javnem naročanju in bi jih bilo treba čim bolj uporabljati.
Where reference is made to a European standard or, in the absence thereof, to a national standard, tenders based on equivalent arrangements should be considered by contracting authorities.
Javni naročniki bi morali pri sklicevanju na evropski standard ali, če tega ni, na nacionalni standard upoštevati ponudbe, ki temeljijo na enakovrednih ureditvah.
It should be the responsibility of the economic operator to prove equivalence with the requested label.
Dokazilo o enakovrednosti z zahtevanim znakom bi moral zagotoviti gospodarski subjekt.
To prove equivalence, it should be possible to require tenderers to provide third-party verified evidence.
Kot dokaz enakovrednosti bi se lahko od ponudnikov zahtevala predložitev dokazila, ki ga preveri tretja oseba.
However, other appropriate means of proof such as a technical dossier of the manufacturer should also be allowed where the economic operator concerned has no access to such certificates or test reports, or no possibility of obtaining them within the relevant time limits, provided that the economic operator concerned thereby proves that the works, supplies or services meet the requirements or criteria set out in the technical specifications, the award criteria or the contract performance conditions.
Vendar se lahko dovolijo tudi druga ustrezna dokazila, kot je tehnična dokumentacija proizvajalca, če zadevni gospodarski subjekt nima dostopa do takih potrdil ali poročil o preizkusih ali jih ne more dobiti v ustreznih rokih, in sicer če zadevni gospodarski subjekt dokaže, da gradnja, blago ali storitve ustrezajo zahtevam ali merilom iz tehničnih specifikacij, meril za oddajo javnega naročila ali pogojev za izvedbo javnega naročila.
Contracting authorities that wish to purchase works, supplies or services with specific environmental, social or other characteristics should be able to refer to particular labels, such as the European Eco-label, (multi-)national eco-labels or any other label provided that the requirements for the label are linked to the subject-matter of the contract, such as the description of the product and its presentation, including packaging requirements.
Javnim naročnikom, ki želijo naročiti gradnje, blago ali storitve z določenimi okoljskimi, socialnimi ali drugimi značilnostmi, bi bilo treba omogočiti sklicevanje na določene znake, kot so znak EU za okolje, (več)nacionalni okoljski znaki ali drugi znaki, če so zahteve za znak povezane s predmetom naročila, kot je opis proizvoda in njegova predstavitev, vključno z zahtevami glede pakiranja.
It is furthermore essential that those requirements are drawn up and adopted on the basis of objectively verifiable criteria, using a procedure in which stakeholders, such as government bodies, consumers, manufacturers, distributors and environmental organisations, can participate, and that the label is accessible and available to all interested parties.
Ključno je še, da se te zahteve sestavijo in sprejmejo na podlagi objektivno preverljivih kriterijev po postopku, v katerem lahko sodelujejo zainteresirane strani, kot so državni organi, potrošniki, proizvajalci, distributerji in okoljske organizacije, ter da je znak dostopen in na voljo vsem zainteresiranim osebam.
It should be clarified that stakeholders could be public or private bodies, businesses or any sort of non-governmental organisation (an organisation that is not a part of a government and is not a conventional business).
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da so zainteresirane strani lahko javni ali zasebni subjekti, podjetja ali kakršne koli nevladne organizacije (organizacija, ki ni del vlade in ni konvencionalno podjetje).
It should equally be clarified that specific national or government bodies or organisations can be involved in setting up label requirements that may be used in connection with procurement by public authorities without those bodies or organisations losing their status as third parties.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba tudi, da določeni nacionalni ali vladni subjekti ali organizacije lahko sodelujejo pri določanju zahtev v zvezi z znaki, ki jih javni organi lahko uporabljajo v povezavi z javnimi naročili, ne da bi ti subjekti ali organizacije pri tem izgubili status tretjih oseb.
References to labels should not have the effect of restricting innovation.
Sklicevanja na znake ne bi smela imeti učinka omejevanja inovacij.
For all procurement intended for use by persons, whether general public or staff of the contracting authority, it is necessary for contracting authorities to lay down technical specifications so as to take into account accessibility criteria for people with disabilities or design for all users, except in duly justified cases.
Javni naročniki morajo tehnične specifikacije za vse nabave, ki naj bi jih uporabljale osebe – bodisi širša javnost bodisi uslužbenci javnega naročnika –, oblikovati tako, da upoštevajo kriterije dostopnosti za invalidne osebe ali zasnovo, prilagojeno vsem uporabnikom, razen v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih.
When drawing up technical specifications, contracting authorities should take into account requirements ensuing from Union law in the field of data protection law, in particular in relation to the design of the processing of personal data (data protection by design).
Javni naročniki bi morali pri oblikovanju tehničnih specifikacij upoštevati zahteve, ki izhajajo iz prava Unije na področju varstva podatkov, zlasti v zvezi z načrtovanjem obdelave osebnih podatkov (vgrajeno varstvo podatkov).
Public procurement should be adapted to the needs of SMEs.
Javno naročanje bi moralo biti prilagojeno potrebam MSP.
Contracting authorities should be encouraged to make use of the Code of Best Practices set out in the Commission Staff Working Document of 25 June 2008 entitled ‘European Code of Best Practices Facilitating Access by SMEs to Public Procurement Contracts’, providing guidance on how they may apply the public procurement framework in a way that facilitates SME participation.
Javne naročnike bi bi bilo treba spodbujati k uporabi kodeksa najboljših praks iz delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 25. junija 2008 z naslovom „Evropski kodeks najboljše prakse za poenostavitev dostopa MSP do pogodb o javnih naročilih“, ki zagotavlja smernice o izvajanju javnih naročil na način, ki bi k sodelovanju spodbujal MSP.
To that end and to enhance competition, contracting authorities should in particular be encouraged to divide large contracts into lots.
V ta namen in da bi okrepili konkurenčnost, bi bilo treba zlasti spodbujati javne naročnike, naj velika naročila razdelijo na sklope.
Such division could be done on a quantitative basis, making the size of the individual contracts better correspond to the capacity of SMEs, or on a qualitative basis, in accordance with the different trades and specialisations involved, to adapt the content of the individual contracts more closely to the specialised sectors of SMEs or in accordance with different subsequent project phases.
To razdelitev bi lahko določili količinsko, pri čemer bi vrednost posameznih naročil bolje prilagodili zmogljivostim MSP, ali pa kakovostno v skladu z različnimi sodelujočimi dejavnostmi in specializacijami, da bi tako vsebino posameznega naročila bolj prilagodili specializiranim sektorjem MSP, ali v skladu z različnimi poznejšimi fazami projekta.
The size and subject-matter of the lots should be determined freely by the contracting authority, which, in accordance with the relevant rules on the calculation of the estimated value of procurement, should also be allowed to award some of the lots without applying the procedures of this Directive.
Velikost in predmet sklopov bi moral prosto določiti javni naročnik, ki bi v skladu z ustreznimi pravili o izračunu ocenjene vrednosti naročila moral tudi imeti možnost, da nekatere sklope odda brez uporabe postopkov iz te direktive.
The contracting authority should have a duty to consider the appropriateness of dividing contracts into lots while remaining free to decide autonomously on the basis of any reason it deems relevant, without being subject to administrative or judicial supervision.
Javni naročnik bi moral biti zavezan, da preuči ustreznost razdelitve naročil v sklope, ob čemer bi moral obdržati možnost, da samostojno odloča na podlagi kakršnega koli razloga, ki se mu zdi pomemben, ne da bi bil izpostavljen upravnemu ali sodnemu nadzoru.
Where the contracting authority decides that it would not be appropriate to divide the contract into lots, the individual report or the procurement documents should contain an indication of the main reasons for the contracting authority’s choice.
Če se javni naročnik odloči, da naročila ne bi bilo ustrezno razdeliti na sklope, bi moralo posamezno poročilo ali dokumentacija v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila vsebovati navedbo glavnih razlogov za odločitev javnega naročnika.
Such reasons could for instance be that the contracting authority finds that such division could risk restricting competition, or risk rendering the execution of the contract excessively technically difficult or expensive, or that the need to coordinate the different contractors for the lots could seriously risk undermining the proper execution of the contract.
Taki razlogi bi med drugim lahko zajemali naslednje: javni naročnik meni, da bi taka razdelitev lahko povzročila omejevanje konkurence, pomenila tehnično prezahtevno ali predrago izvedbo javnega naročila ali pa bi potreba po usklajevanju različnih izvajalcev za sklope lahko resno ogrozila pravilno izvedbo javnega naročila.
Member States should remain free to go further in their efforts to facilitate the involvement of SMEs in the public procurement market, by extending the scope of the obligation to consider the appropriateness of dividing contracts into lots to smaller contracts, by requiring contracting authorities to provide a justification for a decision not to divide contracts into lots or by rendering a division into lots obligatory under certain conditions.
Državam članicam bi še naprej morali omogočiti, da si dodatno prizadevajo za spodbujanje sodelovanja MSP na trgu javnih naročil, in sicer tako, da veljavnost obveznosti za preučitev razdelitve javnih naročil v sklope razširijo na manjša javna naročila, z zahtevo, da javni naročniki predložijo obrazložitev odločitve, zakaj javnih naročil niso razdelili na sklope, ali pa z obvezno razdelitvijo na sklope pod določenimi pogoji.
With the same purpose, Member States should also be free to provide mechanisms for direct payments to subcontractors.
Države članice bi morale z istim namenom tudi ohraniti možnost, da zagotovijo načine neposrednih plačil podizvajalcem.
Where contracts are divided into lots, contracting authorities should, for instance in order to preserve competition or to ensure reliability of supply, be allowed to limit the number of lots for which an economic operator may tender; they should also be allowed to limit the number of lots that may be awarded to any one tenderer.
Kadar so javna naročila razdeljena na sklope, bi morali javni naročniki, na primer zaradi ohranjanja konkurence ali zagotavljanja zanesljivosti blaga, imeti možnost omejitve števila sklopov, za katere lahko gospodarski subjekt predloži ponudbo; prav tako bi morali imeti možnost omejitve števila sklopov, ki se lahko oddajo posameznemu ponudniku.
However, the objective of facilitating greater access to public procurement by SMEs might be hampered if contracting authorities would be obliged to award the contract lot by lot even where this would entail having to accept substantially less advantageous solutions compared to an award grouping several or all of the lots.
Vendar pa bi uresničitev cilja zagotovitve večje dostopnosti do javnih naročil za MSP lahko bila otežena, če bi bili javni naročniki primorani oddati vsak sklop posebej, tudi kadar bi to pomenilo precej manj ugodne rešitve v primerjavi z oddajo več ali vseh sklopov naenkrat.
Where the possibility to apply such a method has been clearly indicated beforehand, it should therefore be possible for contracting authorities to conduct a comparative assessment of the tenders in order to establish whether the tenders submitted by a particular tenderer for a specific combination of lots would, taken as whole, fulfil the award criteria laid down in accordance with this Directive with regard to those lots better than the tenders for the individual lots concerned seen in isolation.
Če je bila možnost uporabe take metode jasno določena vnaprej, bi torej javni naročniki morali imeti možnost, da s primerjalno oceno ponudb ugotovijo, ali bi ponudbe določenega ponudnika za določeno kombinacijo sklopov kot celota bolje ustrezale merilom za oddajo javnega naročila, določenim v skladu s to direktivo, v zvezi s temi sklopi kot ponudbe za vsak posamezen zadevni sklop.
If so, the contracting authority should be allowed to award a contract combining the lots in question to the tenderer concerned.
V tem primeru bi javni naročnik moral imeti možnost, da javno naročilo, ki združuje predmetne sklope, odda zadevnemu ponudniku.
It should be clarified that contracting authorities should conduct such a comparative assessment by first determining which tenders best fulfil the award criteria laid down for each individual lot and then comparing it with the tenders submitted by a particular tenderer for a specific combination of lots, taken as a whole.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da bi morali javni naročniki pri opravljanju take primerjalne ocene najprej ugotoviti, katere ponudbe najbolje izpolnjujejo merila za oddajo javnega naročila, določena za vsak posamezen sklop, zatem pa jih primerjati s ponudbami posameznih ponudnikov za določeno kombinacijo sklopov kot celoto.
In order to make procedures faster and more efficient, time limits for participation in procurement procedures should be kept as short as possible without creating undue barriers to access for economic operators from across the internal market and in particular SMEs.
Za hitrejše in učinkovitejše postopke bi morali biti roki za sodelovanje v postopkih javnega naročanja čim krajši, ne da bi pri tem nastale neupravičene ovire za dostop gospodarskih subjektov s celotnega notranjega trga, zlasti MSP.
It should therefore be kept in mind that, when fixing the time limits for the receipt of tenders and requests to participate, contracting authorities should take account in particular of the complexity of the contract and the time required to draw up tenders, even if this entails setting time limits that are longer than the minima provided for under this Directive.
Zato bi bilo treba upoštevati, da bi morali javni naročniki pri določanju rokov za prejem ponudb in prijav za sodelovanje upoštevati zlasti kompleksnost javnega naročila in čas, potreben za pripravo ponudbe, tudi če to pomeni, da bodo roki zato daljši od minimalnih rokov iz te direktive.
The use of electronic means of information and communication, in particular full electronic availability to economic operators, tenderers and candidates of procurement documents and electronic transmission of communications leads, on the other hand, to increased transparency and time savings.
Uporaba elektronskih informacijskih in komunikacijskih sredstev, zlasti polna elektronska razpoložljivost dokumentacije v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila za gospodarske subjekte, ponudnike in kandidate ter elektronski prenos sporočil, pa po drugi strani zagotavlja večjo transparentnost in prihrani čas.