natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With effect from 1 July 2012, the amounts referred to in Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 [7] shall be subject to a coefficient of 5,5609.Article 15
Z učinkom od 1. julija 2012 se lestvica osnovnih mesečnih plač iz člena 133 Pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev nadomesti z naslednjo lestvico:
With effect from 1 July 2012, the table in Article 8(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations shall be replaced by the following:
Razred
With effect from 1 July 2012, for the application of Article 18(1) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations, the amount of the fixed allowance mentioned in the former Article 4a of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations in force before 1 May 2004 shall be:
Člen 18
EUR 132,89 per month for officials in Grade C4 or C5;
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
EUR 203,76 per month for officials in Grade C1, C2 or C3.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.
With effect from 1 July 2012, the scale for basic monthly salaries in Article 133 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants shall be replaced by the following:
Za Evropski parlament
Opinion of 4 March 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Na podlagi ekonomskih in socialnih podatkov za obdobje od 1. julija 2011 do 31. decembra 2012, denimo o posledicah upada gospodarske rasti jeseni 2011, ki so privedli do recesije v Uniji in poslabšanja socialnega položaja, pa o vztrajno visoki ravni brezposelnosti ter javnega primanjkljaja in dolga v Uniji, je ustrezno, da raven prilagoditve osebnih prejemkov in pokojnin v Belgiji in Luksemburgu za leto 2012 znaša 0,8 %.
Opinion of 3 March 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Ta prilagoditev je del splošnega pristopa za rešitev sporov v zvezi s prilagoditvijo osebnih prejemkov in pokojnin za leti 2011 in 2012, ki obenem vključuje prilagoditev za leto 2011 v višini 0 %.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 424/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 424/2014
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Prekmurska šunka (PGI))
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Prekmurska šunka (ZGO))
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Slovenia's application to register the name ‘Prekmurska šunka’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Zahtevek za registracijo imena „Prekmurska šunka“, ki ga je vložila Slovenija, je bil v skladu s členom 50(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Prekmurska šunka’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Ker Komisija ni prejela nobene izjave o ugovoru v skladu s členom 51 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012, bi bilo treba ime „Prekmurska šunka“ registrirati –
OJ C 361, 11.12.2013, p. 13.
UL C 361, 11.12.2013, str. 13.
SLOVENIA
Skupina 1.2 Mesni proizvodi (kuhani, soljeni, dimljeni itd.)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 425/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 425/2014
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Tørrfisk fra Lofoten (PGI))
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Tørrfisk fra Lofoten (ZGO))
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the application to register the name ‘Tørrfisk fra Lofoten’ submitted by the Norwegian producer group ‘Tørrfisk fra Lofoten AS’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Zahtevek za registracijo imena „Tørrfisk fra Lofoten“, ki ga je vložila skupina proizvajalcev „Tørrfisk fra Lofoten AS“ (Norveška), je bil v skladu s členom 50(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Tørrfisk fra Lofoten’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Ker Komisija ni prejela nobene izjave o ugovoru v skladu s členom 51 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012, bi bilo treba ime „Tørrfisk fra Lofoten“ registrirati –
OJ C 361, 11.12.2013, p. 10.
UL C 361, 11.12.2013, str. 10.
NORWAY
Skupina 1.7 Sveže ribe, mehkužci in raki ter iz njih pridobljeni proizvodi
Commission Regulation (EU) No 426/2014
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 426/2014
of 25 April 2014
z dne 25. aprila 2014
amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks
o spremembi Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 110/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o opredelitvi, opisu, predstavitvi, označevanju in zaščiti geografskih označb žganih pijač
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 on the definition, description, presentation, labelling and the protection of geographical indications of spirit drinks [1], and in particular Article 26 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 110/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. januarja 2008 o opredelitvi, opisu, predstavitvi, označevanju in zaščiti geografskih označb žganih pijač [1] ter zlasti člena 26 Uredbe,
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 provides that the spirit drinks of the category 16 ‘Spirit (preceded by the name of the fruit) obtained by maceration and distillation’ can be obtained from the maceration and distillation of fruits or berries listed therein.
Priloga II k Uredbi (ES) št. 110/2008 določa, da se žgane pijače kategorije 16 „Žganje (pred katerim je navedeno ime sadja ali jagodičja), pridobljeno z maceracijo in destilacijo“, lahko pridobijo z maceracijo in destilacijo sadja ali jagodičja, navedenega v Prilogi.
In some Member States, this type of spirit drink is traditionally produced also with other fruits, which are not included in that list.
V nekaterih državah članicah se ta vrsta žganih pijač tradicionalno proizvaja tudi z drugim sadjem, ki ni vključeno na navedeni seznam.
Therefore the list of fruits or berries used for the production of spirit drinks under that category should be extended.
Zato bi bilo treba seznam sadja ali jagodičja, ki se uporablja za proizvodnjo žganih pijač iz navedene kategorije, razširiti.
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 provides that the spirit drinks of the category 24 ‘Akvavit or aquavit’ are caraway and/or dillseed-flavoured spirit drinks flavoured with a distillate of plants or spices.
Priloga II k Uredbi (ES) št. 110/2008 določa, da so žgane pijače kategorije 24 „Akvavit ali aquavit“ žgane pijače z aromo kumine in/ali semen kopra, aromatizirane z destilatom rastlin ali začimb.
Those spirit drinks are traditionally produced by using ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin.
Navedene žgane pijače se tradicionalno proizvajajo z uporabo etanola kmetijskega porekla.
The current category of spirit drink ‘Akvavit or aquavit’ does not specify the obligation to use ethyl alcohol.
Sedanja kategorija žganih pijač „Akvavit ali aquavit“ ne določa obvezne uporabe etanola.
However, using ethyl alcohol in the production of ‘Akvavit or aquavit’ is essential to ensure the quality of the product.
Vendar je uporaba etanola pri proizvodnji žganih pijač „Akvavit ali aquavit“ bistvenega pomena za zagotovitev kakovosti izdelka.
Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 110/2008 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga II k Uredbi (ES) št. 110/2008 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
Done at Brussels, 25 April 2014.
V Bruslju, 25. aprila 2014
OJ L 39, 13.2.2008, p. 16.
UL L 39, 13.2.2008, str. 16.
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 110/2008 is amended as follows:
Priloga II k Uredbi (ES) št. 110/2008 se spremeni:
in point (a) of category 16, point (ii) is replaced by the following:
v točki (a) kategorije 16 se točka (ii) nadomesti z naslednjim:
obtained from the following fruits or berries:
pridobljena iz naslednjega sadja ali jagodičja:
blackberry (Rubus fruticosus auct. aggr.),
robidnic (Rubus fruticosus auct. aggr.),
strawberry (Fragaria spp.),
jagod (Fragaria spp.),
bilberry/blueberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.),
borovnic (Vaccinium myrtillus L.),
raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.),
malin (Rubus idaeus L.),
redcurrant (Ribes rubrum L.),
rdečega ribeza (Ribes rubrum L.),
white currant (Ribes niveum Lindl.),
belega ribeza (Ribes niveum Lindl.),
blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.),
črnega ribeza (Ribes nigrum L.),
sloe (Prunus spinosa L.),
trnulj (Prunus spinosa L.),
rowanberry (Sorbus aucuparia L.),
jagod jerebike (Sorbus aucuparia L.),
service-berry (Sorbus domestica L.),
plodov jerebike (Sorbus domestica L.),
hollyberry (Ilex aquifolium and Ilex cassine L.),
slezovih jagod (Ilex aquifolium in Ilex cassine L.),
checkerberry (Sorbus torminalis (L.)
jagod breka (Sorbus torminalis (L.)
elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.),
bezgovih jagod (Sambucus nigra L.),
gooseberry (Ribes uva-crispa L. syn.
kosmulj (Ribes uva-crispa L. syn.
cranberry (Vaccinium L. subgenus Oxycoccus),
mahovnic (Vaccinium L. subgenus Oxycoccus),
lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.),
brusnic (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.),
high bush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.),
ameriških žlahtnih borovnic (Vaccinium corymbosum L.),
sea-buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.),
morske krhlike (Hippophae rhamnoides L.),
cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus L.),
barjanskih robid (Rubus chamaemorus L.),
crowberry (Empetrum nigrum L.),
črnih mahunic (Empetrum nigrum L.),
arctic bramble (Rubus arcticus L.),
arktičnih robidnic (Rubus arcticus L.),
banana (Musa spp.),
banan (Musa spp.),
passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims),
pasijonke (Passiflora edulis Sims),
ambarella (Spondias dulcis Sol. ex Parkinson),
rdečih sliv mombin (Spondias dulcis Sol. ex Parkinson),
hog plum (Spondias mombin L.),
rumenih sliv mombin (Spondias mombin L.),
walnut (Juglans regia L.),
orehov (Juglans regia L.),
hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.),
lešnikov (Corylus avellana L.),
chestnut (Castanea sativa L.),
kostanja (Castanea sativa L.),
citrus fruits (Citrus spp.
agrumov (Citrus spp.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 427/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 427/2014
establishing a procedure for the approval and certification of innovative technologies for reducing CO2 emissions from light commercial vehicles pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o uvedbi postopka za odobritev in certificiranje inovativnih tehnologij za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz lahkih gospodarskih vozil na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2011 setting emissions performance standards for new light commercial vehicles as part of the Union's integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles [1], and in particular Article 12(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2011 o določitvi standardov emisijskih vrednosti za nova lahka gospodarska vozila kot del celostnega pristopa Unije za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz lahkih tovornih vozil [1] in zlasti člena 12(2) Uredbe,
In order to promote the development and the early uptake of new and advanced CO2 emission-reducing vehicle technologies, Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 provides manufacturers and suppliers with the possibility of applying for the approval of certain innovative technologies contributing to reducing CO2 emissions from new light commercial vehicles.
Da bi se spodbudila razvoj ter hitro uvajanje novih in naprednih tehnologij za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 pri vozilih, Uredba (EU) št. 510/2011 proizvajalcem in dobaviteljem omogoča, da zaprosijo za odobritev nekaterih inovativnih tehnologij, ki prispevajo k zmanjšanju emisij CO2 iz novih lahkih gospodarskih vozil.
It is appropriate to take into account the experience gained from the introduction of a scheme for innovative technologies for passenger cars pursuant to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011 [2] and apply the same eligibility criteria for light commercial vehicles.
Primerno je, da se upoštevajo izkušnje, pridobljene po uvedbi sistema za inovativne tehnologije za osebna vozila na podlagi Izvedbene Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 725/2011 [2], in da se za lahka gospodarska vozila uporabljajo enaka merila za upravičenost.
A distinction should however be made with regard to light commercial vehicles that are constructed and type-approved in multi-stages.
Vendar bi bilo treba narediti razliko za gospodarska vozila, ki so izdelana in homologirana v več stopnjah.
For those vehicles, it is appropriate to limit the certification of the CO2 reductions to eco-innovations fitted to the base vehicle.
Za navedena vozila je primerno, da se certificiranje zmanjšanja CO2 omeji na ekološke inovacije, vgrajene v osnovno vozilo.
According to of Article 12(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011, technologies that are part of the Union's integrated approach outlined in two Commission Communications of 7 February 2007 [3], and have been regulated in Union law, or other technologies that are mandatory under Union law, are not eligible as eco-innovations under that Regulation.
V skladu s členom 12(2)(c) Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011 tehnologije, ki so del celostnega pristopa Unije, opisanega v dveh sporočilih Komisije z dne 7. februarja 2007 [3], in so urejene v zakonodaji Unije, ali druge tehnologije, ki so po zakonodaji Unije obvezne, ne štejejo za upravičene kot ekološke inovacije v skladu z navedeno uredbo.
Those technologies include tyre pressure monitoring systems, tyre rolling resistance and gear shift indicators falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] and, as regards tyre rolling resistance, Regulation (EC) No 1222/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5].
Navedene tehnologije vključujejo sisteme za nadzor tlaka v pnevmatikah, kotalni upor pnevmatik in kazalnike menjanja prestav, ki spadajo v področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 661/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] ter, v primeru kotalnega upora pnevmatik, Uredbe (ES) št. 1222/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5].
A technology that has already for some time been widely available on the market cannot be considered innovative within the meaning of Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 and should therefore not be eligible as an eco-innovation.
Tehnologija, ki je že nekaj časa splošno dostopna na trgu, se ne more šteti za inovativno v smislu člena 12 Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011 in se zato ne bi smela šteti za upravičeno kot ekološko inovacijo.
Those thresholds should be subject to review at the latest in 2016.
Tehnologije, ki imajo pri tem namenu postranski pomen ali katerih cilj je izboljšanje udobja voznika ali potnikov, se ne bi smele šteti kot upravičene.
In order to promote technologies with the highest potential for reducing CO2 emissions from light commercial vehicles, and in particular the development of innovative propulsion technologies, only those technologies should be eligible that are intrinsic to the transport function of the vehicle and contribute significantly to improving the overall energy consumption of the vehicle.
V skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 510/2011 lahko prošnjo vložijo proizvajalci in dobavitelji.
Technologies that are accessory to that purpose or aim at enhancing the comfort of the driver or the passengers should not be eligible.
Prošnja bi morala vključevati potrebna dokazila, da so merila za upravičenost v celoti izpolnjena, vključno z metodologijo za merjenje prihrankov CO2 zaradi inovativne tehnologije.
According to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011, applications may be submitted by both manufacturers and suppliers.
Prihranki CO2 zaradi ekološke inovacije bi morali biti merljivi, pri čemer je potrebna zadostna stopnja točnosti.
The application should include the necessary evidence that the eligibility criteria are fully met, including a methodology for measuring the CO2 savings from the innovative technology.
To točnost je mogoče doseči le, če je prihranek 1 g CO2/km ali več.
It should be possible to measure the CO2 savings from an eco-innovation with a satisfactory degree of accuracy.
Če so prihranki CO2 pri posamezni tehnologiji odvisni od obnašanja voznika ali drugih dejavnikov, ki so zunaj nadzora vlagatelja, se ta tehnologija načeloma ne bi smela šteti za upravičeno kot ekološka inovacija, razen če je mogoče na podlagi tehtnih in neodvisnih statističnih dokazov preverljivo predvideti obnašanje povprečnega voznika.
That accuracy can only be achieved where the savings are 1 g CO2/km or more.
S standardnim poskusnim ciklom, ki se uporablja za merjenje emisij CO2 iz vozil pri homologacijah, se ne prikažejo vsi prihranki, ki jih je mogoče doseči z nekaterimi tehnologijami.
Where the CO2 savings of a technology depends on the behaviour of the driver or on other factors that are outside the control of the applicant, that technology should in principle not be eligible as an eco-innovation, unless it is possible, on the basis of strong and independent statistical evidence, to make verifiable assumptions about average driver behaviour.
Da bi se oblikovale pravilne spodbude za inovacije, bi bilo treba pri izračunu skupnega prihranka CO2 upoštevati le prihranke, ki niso zajeti v standardnem poskusnem ciklu.
The standard test cycle used for type-approval measurement of the CO2 emissions from a vehicle does not demonstrate all savings that can be attributed to certain technologies.
Pri prikazu prihranka CO2 bi bilo treba med seboj primerjati enaka vozila z ekološko inovacijo in brez nje.
To create the right incentives for innovation, only those savings that are not captured by the standard test cycle should be taken into account for the calculation of the total CO2 savings.
Metodologija preskušanja bi morala vključevati zanesljive, ponovljive in primerljive meritve.
In demonstrating the CO2 savings, a comparison should be made between the same vehicles with and without the eco-innovation.
Da bi se zagotovili enaki konkurenčni pogoji ter ker ni na voljo dogovorjenega in bolj realnega voznega cikla, bi bilo treba kot skupno referenco uporabiti vozne vzorce iz novega evropskega voznega cikla v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 692/2008 [6].
The testing methodology should provide verifiable, repeatable and comparable measurements.
Metodologija preskušanja bi morala temeljiti na meritvah z dinamometrom ali na modeliranju ali simulaciji, kadar bi takšne metodologije zagotovile boljše in natančnejše rezultate.
In order to ensure a level playing field and, in the absence of an agreed and more realistic driving cycle, the driving patterns in the New European Driving Cycle as referred to in Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 [6] should be used as a common reference.
Komisija bi morala zagotoviti smernice za pripravo prošnje in metodologij preskušanja, pri čemer bi jih morala redno posodabljati, da se bodo v njih upoštevale izkušnje, pridobljene z ocenjevanjem različnih prošenj.
The testing methodology should be based on measurements on a chassis dynamometer or on modelling or simulation where such methodologies would provide better and more accurate results.
Prošnji je treba v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 510/2011 priložiti poročilo o preverjanju, ki ga zagotovi neodvisni in priglašeni organ.
Guidelines on the preparation of the application and the testing methodologies should be provided by the Commission and be regularly updated to take into account the experience gained from assessing different applications.
Ta organ bi moral biti tehnična služba kategorije A ali B iz Direktive 2007/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7].
According to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011, the application must be accompanied by a verification report provided by an independent and certified body.
Vendar se tehnične službe, imenovane v skladu s členom 41(6) navedene direktive, zaradi zagotavljanja neodvisnosti organa ne bi smele šteti za neodvisni in priglašeni organ v smislu te uredbe.
That body should be a technical service of category A or B as referred to in Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [7].
Organ bi moral skupaj s poročilom o preverjanju predložiti ustrezna dokazila o svoji neodvisnosti od vlagatelja.
However, in order to ensure the independence of the body, technical services designated in accordance with Article 41(6) of that Directive should not be considered an independent and certified body within the meaning of this Regulation.
Da bi se zagotovila učinkovita registracija in spremljanje posebnih prihrankov pri posameznih vozilih, bi bilo treba prihranke certificirati kot del homologacije vozila, pri čemer bi bilo treba skupni prihranek vpisati v certifikat o skladnosti v skladu z Direktivo 2007/46/ES.
The body should, together with the verification report, provide relevant evidence of its independence from the applicant.
Komisija bi morala imeti možnost, da občasno preveri certificirane skupne prihranke posameznih vozil.
In order to ensure efficient registration and monitoring of the specific savings for individual vehicles, savings should be certified as part of the type-approval of a vehicle and the total savings should be entered into the certificate of conformity in accordance with Directive 2007/46/EC.
Če se izkaže, da certificirani prihranki niso skladni s stopnjo prihrankov, ki izhaja iz sklepa o odobritvi tehnologije kot ekološke inovacije, bi morala imeti Komisija možnost, da pri izračunu povprečnih specifičnih emisij CO2 ne upošteva certificiranih prihrankov CO2.
The Commission should have the possibility to verify on an ad hoc basis the certified total savings for individual vehicles.
Vendar bi moral imeti proizvajalec na voljo omejeno časovno obdobje, v katerem lahko dokaže, da so certificirane vrednosti točne.
Where it is evident that the certified savings are inconsistent with the level of savings resulting from the decision to approve a technology as an eco-innovation, the Commission should be able to disregard the certified CO2 savings for the calculation of the average specific CO2 emissions.
Da bi se zagotovil pregleden postopek vlaganja prošenj, bi bilo treba javnosti dati na voljo povzetek informacij o prošnjah za odobritev inovativnih tehnologij in metodologij preskušanja.
The manufacturer should, however, be given a limited time period during which it may demonstrate that the certified values are accurate.
Potem ko so metodologije preskušanja potrjene, bi morale biti javno dostopne.
In order to ensure a transparent application procedure, summary information should be available to the public on the applications for approval of innovative technologies and the testing methodologies.
Po potrebi bi morale veljati izjeme glede pravice dostopa javnosti do dokumentov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8].
Once approved, the testing methodologies should be publicly accessible.
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za podnebne spremembe –
The exceptions to the right to public access to documents set out in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council [8] should apply as appropriate.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Climate Change Committee,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Področje urejanja
Article 1
Ta uredba določa postopek, ki ga je treba upoštevati pri prošnjah za odobritev inovativnih tehnologij, s katerimi se zmanjšujejo emisije CO2 iz lahkih gospodarskih vozil na podlagi člena 12 Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011, ter pri oceni, odobritvi in certificiranju takšnih tehnologij.
Subject matter
Člen 2
This Regulation sets out the procedure to be followed for the application for, and assessment, approval and certification of innovative technologies that reduce emissions of CO2 from light commercial vehicles pursuant to Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 510/2011.
Področje uporabe