natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Sklepu 2012/642/SZVP se spremeni, kot je določeno v Prilogi k temu sklepu.
In the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP, entry No. 210 shall be replaced by the following:
V Prilogi k Sklepu 2012/642/SZVP se vnos št. 210 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Names Transcription of Belarusian spelling Transcription of Russian spelling
Ime (angleško prečrkovanje beloruskega in ruskega zapisa)
Names (Belarusian spelling)
Ime (belorusko črkovanje)
Names (Russian spelling)
Ime (rusko črkovanje)
POB: Donetsk, Ukraine.
Kraj rojstva: Donetsk, Ukrajina
Person close to family members of President Lukashenka.
Oseba, ki je blizu družinskim članom predsednika Lukašenka.
His company Univest-M is a partner of the President's Sports Club, and until May 2011 employed the President's daughter-in-law.
Njegovo podjetje Univest-M je partner predsednikovega športnega kluba, do maja 2011 pa je bila v njem zaposlena predsednikova snaha.
He provides support to the regime, in particular financially, through payments by Univest-M to the Belarusian Ministry of Internal Affairs, Belarusian (State) TV and Radio Company, and the trade union of the chamber of representatives of the National Assembly.
Podpira režim, zlasti finančno s plačili podjetja Univest-M beloruskemu ministrstvu za notranje zadeve, beloruski (državni) radioteleviziji in sindikatu poslanske zbornice narodne skupščine. Ima koristi od režima prek obsežnih podjetniških dejavnosti v Belorusiji.
Univest-M is also one of the largest development/real estate companies in Belarus.
Univest-M je tudi eno od največjih razvojnih in nepremičninskih podjetij v Belorusiji.
Business activities on this scale would not be possible in Belarus without the approval of the Lukashenka regime.
V Belorusiji podjetniške dejavnosti v tolikšnem obsegu ne bi bile možne brez odobritve Lukašenkovega režima.
He sponsors several sports clubs, through Univest-M, thereby contributing to good relations with President Lukashenka.
Prek podjetja Univest-M sponzorira več športnih klubov in tako prispeva k dobrim odnosom s predsednikom Lukašenkom.
(Ternavski, Anatoli Andrievich
(Ternavski, Anatoli Andrievich;
He benefits from the regime through large scale business activities in Belarus. Univest-M owns a subsidiary, FLCC, which is a leading operator in the oil and hydrocarbon sectors.
Univest-M ima v lasti podružnico FLCC, ki je glavni akter v sektorjih nafte in ogljikovodikov, vključno s projekti, za katere se trdi, da "krepijo partnerske odnose med Belorusijo, Rusko federacijo, Kazahstanom in Ukrajino".
amending Decision ECB/2010/23 on the allocation of monetary income of the national central banks of Member States whose currency is the euro
o spremembi Sklepa ECB/2010/23 o razporeditvi denarnih prihodkov nacionalnih centralnih bank držav članic, katerih valuta je euro
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,
ob upoštevanju Statuta Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke ter zlasti člena 32 Statuta,
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 32 thereof,
ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
Whereas:
Sklep ECB/2010/23 [1] vzpostavlja mehanizem za združevanje in razporejanje denarnega prihodka, ki izvira iz operacij denarne politike.
Decision ECB/2010/23 [1] establishes a mechanism for the pooling and allocation of monetary income arising from monetary policy operations.
Člen 5(2) Sklepa ECB/2010/23 določa, da se znesek denarnih prihodkov vsake nacionalne centralne banke zniža za znesek, enak natečenim oziroma plačanim obrestim za obveznosti, ki so vključene v obveznostno osnovo, in v skladu s katerim koli sklepom Sveta ECB na podlagi drugega pododstavka člena 32.4 Statuta Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke.
Article 5(2) of Decision ECB/2010/23 specifies that the amount of each NCB's monetary income is to be reduced by an amount equivalent to any interest accrued or paid on liabilities included within the liability base, and in accordance with any decision of the Governing Council under the second subparagraph of Article 32.4 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank.
Pojasniti je treba, da bi vsak prihodek iz obveznosti, vključenih v obveznostno osnovo, moral biti dodan k denarnim prihodkom nacionalnih centralnih bank, ki se združujejo.
It should be clarified that any income earned on liabilities included within the liability base should be added to the NCBs' monetary income to be pooled.
Sklep ECB/2010/23 je treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Decision ECB/2010/23 should be amended accordingly,
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Article 1
Sprememba
Amendment
Člen 5(2) Sklepa ECB/2010/23 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 5(2) of Decision ECB/2010/23 is replaced by the following:
Znesek denarnih prihodkov vsake NCB se prilagodi za znesek, enak natečenim, plačanim ali prejetim obrestim za obveznosti, ki so vključene v obveznostno osnovo, in v skladu s katerim koli sklepom Sveta ECB na podlagi drugega pododstavka člena 32.4 Statuta ESCB.“.
The amount of each NCB's monetary income shall be adjusted by an amount equivalent to any interest accrued, paid or received on liabilities included within the liability base, and in accordance with any decision of the Governing Council under the second subparagraph of Article 32.4 of the Statute of the ESCB.’.
Člen 2
The President of the ECB
Sklep ECB/2010/23 z dne 25. novembra 2010 o razporeditvi denarnih prihodkov nacionalnih centralnih bank držav članic, katerih valuta je euro (UL L 35, 9.2.2011, str. 17).
of 17 January 2014
z dne 17. januarja 2014
on the notification by the Slovak Republic of a transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions
o priglasitvi prehodnega nacionalnega načrta iz člena 32 Direktive 2010/75/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o industrijskih emisijah, ki ga je predložila Slovaška republika
(notified under document C(2014) 59)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 59)
Having regard to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) [1], and in particular Article 32(5), second subparagraph thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2010/75/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o industrijskih emisijah (celovito preprečevanje in nadzorovanje onesnaževanja) [1] ter zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 32(5) Direktive,
In accordance with Article 32(5) first subparagraph of Directive 2010/75/EU, the Slovak Republic submitted to the Commission its transitional national plan (TNP) on 8 January 2013 [2].
Slovaška republika je v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 32(5) Direktive 2010/75/EU 8. januarja 2013 Komisiji predložila svoj prehodni nacionalni načrt (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PNN) [2].
During the assessment of the completeness of the TNP, the Commission found some inconsistencies between the list of plants included in the TNP and those reported by the Slovak Republic in its emission inventory for 2009 under Directive 2001/80/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
Komisija je med oceno popolnosti PNN odkrila nekaj neskladnosti med seznamom naprav, vključenih v PNN, in napravami, ki jih je Slovaška republika vključila v svoj popis emisij za leto 2009 na podlagi Direktive 2001/80/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3].
By letter of 12 June 2013 [4], the Commission requested the Slovak authorities to confirm that the aggregation rules set out in Article 29 of Directive 2010/75/EU and the definition of ‘operating hours’ set out in Article 3(27) of Directive 2010/75/EU had been applied correctly.
V dopisu z dne 12. junija 2013 [4] je Komisija od slovaških organov zahtevala, naj potrdijo, da so bili agregacijska pravila iz člena 29 Direktive 2010/75/EU in opredelitev „obratovalnih ur“ iz člena 3(27) Direktive 2010/75/EU pravilno uporabljeni.
The Commission also asked to provide additional data, in particular clarification about any inconsistencies between the TNP and the emission inventory under Directive 2001/80/EC.
Komisija je prav tako zahtevala, naj predložijo dodatne podatke, zlasti pojasnilo morebitnih neskladnosti med PNN in popisom emisij na podlagi Direktive 2001/80/ES.
The Slovak Republic submitted additional information by letter of 27 June 2013 [5].
Slovaška republika je predložila dodatne informacije v dopisu z dne 27. junija 2013 [5].
Based on the analysis of the updated information, the Commission, by letter of 23 July 2013 [6], requested the Slovak authorities to confirm that none of the plants that benefited from a derogation under Article 4(4) of Directive 2001/80/EC was included in the TNP.
Na podlagi analize posodobljenih podatkov je Komisija v dopisu z dne 23. julija 2013 [6] od slovaških organov zahtevala, naj potrdijo, da v PNN ni bila vključena nobena od naprav, za katere je veljalo izvzetje iz člena 4(4) Direktive 2001/80/ES.
The Commission also requested the Slovak authorities to verify a number of emission limit values used for the calculations and to provide evidence that the criteria justifying their application were met.
Komisija je od slovaških organov prav tako zahtevala, naj preverijo več mejnih vrednosti emisij, uporabljenih za izračune, in da predložijo dokaze o izpolnjevanju meril za njihovo uporabo.
By letter of 16 August 2013 [7], the Slovak Republic informed the Commission that two plants had been removed from the TNP.
Slovaška republika je v dopisu z dne 16. avgusta 2013 [7] Komisijo obvestila, da sta bili iz PNN umaknjeni dve napravi.
The Slovak Republic also provided a number of corrected emission limit values, but for two plants no justification was provided for using specific emission limit values.
Slovaška republika je predložila tudi več popravljenih mejnih vrednosti emisij, vendar za dve napravi ni predložila utemeljitve uporabe posebnih mejnih vrednosti emisij.
By letter of 27 September 2013 [8], the Commission informed the Slovak Republic that, according to Article 32(1)(d) of Directive 2010/75/EU, and based on the information provided, the plant ‘U.S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., boilers K1-K5’, part of which had applied the derogation under Article 4(4) of Directive 2001/80/EC, could not be included in the TNP.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 27. septembra 2013 [8] Slovaško republiko obvestila, da v skladu s členom 32(1)(d) Direktive 2010/75/EU in na podlagi predloženih informacij naprave „U.S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., boilers K1-K5“, za katere del je veljalo izvzetje iz člena 4(4) Direktive 2001/80/ES, ni mogoče vključiti v PNN.
The Commission also requested the Slovak authorities to provide additional information concerning the ash content of the liquid fuel fired in two plants for which an emission limit value for dust of 100 mg/Nm3 had been applied.
Komisija je od slovaških organov tudi zahtevala, naj predložijo dodatne informacije glede vsebnosti pepela v tekočem gorivu, ki se uporablja v dveh napravah, za kateri je bila uporabljena mejna vrednost emisij za prah v višini 100 mg/Nm3.
By letter of 30 September 2013 [9], the Slovak Republic informed the Commission that the emission limit value for dust used for the two plants had been reduced to 50 mg/Nm3.
Slovaška republika je v dopisu z dne 30. septembra 2013 [9] Komisijo obvestila, da je bila mejna vrednost emisij za prah, uporabljena za obe napravi, zmanjšana na 50 mg/Nm3.
The Slovak Republic provided additional information to support the argument that the plant ‘U.S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., boilers K1-K5’ would not fall under Article 32(1)(d) of Directive 2010/75/EU and could be included in the TNP.
Slovaška republika je predložila dodatne informacije, da bi utemeljila trditev, da za napravo „U.S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., boilers K1-K5“ ne velja člen 32(1)(d) Direktive 2010/75/EU in da se lahko vključi v PNN.
This means that the plant concerned does not fall under Article 32(1)(d) of Directive 2010/75/EU and can be included in the TNP, in conformity with Commission Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU [11].
To pomeni, da za zadevno napravo ne velja člen 32(1)(d) Direktive 2010/75/EU in da se v skladu z Izvedbenim sklepom Komisije 2012/115/EU [11] lahko vključi v PNN.
The TNP has been assessed by the Commission in accordance with Article 32(1), (3) and (4) of Directive 2010/75/EU and with Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU.
Komisija je PNN ocenila v skladu s členom 32(1), (3) in (4) Direktive 2010/75/EU ter z Izvedbenim sklepom 2012/115/EU.
In particular, the Commission has examined the consistency and correctness of the data, assumptions and calculations used for determining the contributions of each of the combustion plants covered by the TNP to the emission ceilings set out in the TNP, and has analysed whether it contains objectives and related targets, measures and timetables for reaching these objectives and a monitoring mechanism to assess future compliance.
Komisija je zlasti preučila skladnost in pravilnost podatkov, predpostavk in izračunov, uporabljenih za določitev prispevka vsake kurilne naprave, zajete v PNN, k zgornjim mejam emisij iz PNN, ter analizirala, ali vsebuje naloge in z njimi povezane cilje, ukrepe in časovne okvire za doseganje teh ciljev ter mehanizem spremljanja za oceno skladnosti v prihodnje.
Further to the additional information submitted, the Commission found that the emission ceilings for the years 2016 and 2019 were calculated using the appropriate data and formulae and that the calculations were correct.
Na podlagi predloženih dodatnih informacij je Komisija ugotovila, da so bile zgornje meje emisij za leti 2016 in 2019 izračunane z uporabo ustreznih podatkov in formul ter da so izračuni pravilni.
The Slovak Republic has provided sufficient information regarding the measures that will be implemented in order to achieve the emission ceilings, the monitoring and the reporting to the Commission on the implementation of the TNP.
Slovaška republika je predložila dovolj informacij glede ukrepov, ki bodo uvedeni za dosego zgornjih mej emisij, in spremljanja ter poročanja Komisiji o izvajanju PNN.
The Commission is satisfied that the Slovak authorities have taken into consideration the provisions listed in Article 32(1), (3) and (4) of Directive 2010/75/EU and in Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU.
Komisija je zadovoljna, da so slovaški organi upoštevali določbe, navedene v členu 32(1), (3) in (4) Direktive 2010/75/EU ter v Izvedbenem sklepu 2012/115/EU.
The implementation of the TNP should be without prejudice to other applicable national and Union law.
Izvajanje PNN ne bi smelo posegati v drugo veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo in zakonodajo Unije.
In particular, by setting individual permit conditions for the combustion plants covered by the TNP, the Slovak Republic should ensure that compliance with the requirements set out in, inter alia, Directive 2010/75/EU, Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [12] and Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [13] is not jeopardised.
Slovaška republika bi morala zlasti pri določanju posameznih pogojev v dovoljenjih za kurilne naprave, zajete v PNN, zagotoviti, da ni ogrožena skladnost z zahtevami iz, med drugim, Direktive 2010/75/EU, Direktive 2008/50/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12] in Direktive 2001/81/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13].
Article 32(6) of Directive 2010/75/EU requires the Slovak Republic to inform the Commission of any subsequent changes to the TNP.
V skladu s členom 32(6) Direktive 2010/75/EU mora Slovaška republika o vseh naknadnih spremembah PNN obvestiti Komisijo.
The Commission should assess whether those changes comply with the provisions laid down in Article 32(1), (3) and (4) of Directive 2010/75/EU and in Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU.
Komisija bi morala oceniti, ali so te spremembe skladne z določbami iz člena 32(1), (3) in (4) Direktive 2010/75/EU ter Izvedbenega sklepa 2012/115/EU –
On the basis of Article 32(1), (3) and (4) of Directive 2010/75/EU and of Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU, no objections are raised against the transitional national plan, which the Slovak Republic notified to the Commission on 8 January 2013 pursuant to Article 32(5) of Directive 2010/75/EU, as amended in accordance with the additional information sent on 27 June 2013, 16 August 2013, 30 September 2013 and 17 October 2013 [14].
Na podlagi člena 32(1), (3) in (4) Direktive 2010/75/EU ter Izvedbenega sklepa 2012/115/EU ni nobenih ugovorov proti prehodnemu nacionalnemu načrtu, ki ga je Slovaška republika priglasila Komisiji 8. januarja 2013 v skladu s členom 32(5) Direktive 2010/75/EU in kakor je bil spremenjen v skladu z dodatnimi informacijami, poslanimi 27. junija 2013, 16. avgusta 2013, 30. septembra 2013 in 17. oktobra 2013 [14].
The implementation of the transitional national plan by the Slovak authorities shall not exempt the Slovak Republic from compliance with the provisions of Directive 2010/75/EU concerning the emissions from the individual combustion plants covered by the plan, and with other relevant bodies of the European Union environmental law.
Slovaška republika mora kljub temu, da njeni organi izvajajo prehodni nacionalni načrt, še vedno zagotavljati skladnost z določbami Direktive 2010/75/EU v zvezi z emisijami iz posameznih kurilnih naprav, ki so zajete v načrtu, in z drugimi ustreznimi akti okoljske zakonodaje Evropske unije.
The Commission shall assess if any subsequent changes to the transitional national plan, notified by the Slovak Republic in the future, comply with the provisions listed in Article 32(1), (3) and (4) of Directive 2010/75/EU and in Implementing Decision 2012/115/EU.
Komisija oceni, ali bodo morebitne poznejše spremembe prehodnega nacionalnega načrta, ki jih bo priglasila Slovaška republika, v skladu z določbami iz člena 32(1), (3) in (4) Direktive 2010/75/EU ter Izvedbenega sklepa 2012/115/EU.
Done at Brussels, 17 January 2014.
V Bruslju, 17. januarja 2014
The notification by the Slovak Republic was received by the Commission by e-mail on 9 January 2013, registered under reference number Ares(2013)25811.
Komisija je uradno obvestilo Slovaške republike prejela po elektronski pošti 9. januarja 2013 in ga evidentirala pod referenčno številko Ares(2013)25811.
By letter of 9 January 2013 (registered under reference number Ares(2013)40113), the Commission received an explanation from the Slovak authorities that due to technical problems with the IT system at the end of 2012, the electronic version of the TNP could not be delivered to the Commission before 1 January 2013 but was resent immediately once the IT system was operational again.
V dopisu z dne 9. januarja 2013 (evidentiranem pod referenčno številko Ares(2013)40113) je Komisija od slovaških organov prejela pojasnilo, da zaradi tehničnih težav s sistemom IT konec leta 2012 elektronske različice PNN ni bilo mogoče dostaviti Komisiji pred 1. januarjem 2013, vendar je bila ponovno poslana takoj, ko je sistem IT spet deloval.
Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (OJ L 152, 11.6.2008, p. 1).
Direktiva 2008/50/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. maja 2008 o kakovosti zunanjega zraka in čistejšem zraku za Evropo (UL L 152, 11.6.2008, str. 1).
The consolidated version of the TNP was registered by the Commission on 7 October 2013 under registration number Ares(2013)3198587.
Komisija je prečiščeno različico PNN evidentirala 7. oktobra 2013 pod referenčno številko Ares(2013)3198587.
For the plant ‘U.S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., boilers K1-K5’, the Slovak Republic clarified that, although part of the plant had been subject to the derogation under Article 4(4) of Directive 2001/80/EC during a number of years, that part had been rebuilt in 2010.
Glede naprave „U.S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., boilers K1-K5“ je Slovaška republika pojasnila, da je za del naprave več let veljalo izvzetje iz člena 4(4) Direktive 2001/80/ES, vendar je bil ta del leta 2010 prenovljen.
The Slovak Republic argued that this plant could therefore be included in the TNP.
Trdila je, da se ta naprava zato lahko vključi v PNN.
Following a meeting between the Slovak authorities and representatives of the Commission on 11 October 2013, the Slovak Republic, by letter of 17 October 2013 [10] further clarified the situation of the plant ‘U.S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., boilers K1-K5’, by specifying that only one boiler had been applying the derogation under Article 4(4) of Directive 2001/80/EC and by providing a detailed technical description of all changes introduced for that boiler during its reconstruction in 2010.
Po srečanju slovaških organov in predstavnikov Komisije 11. oktobra 2013 je Slovaška republika v dopisu z dne 17. oktobra 2013 [10] nadalje pojasnila stanje naprave „U.S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., boilers K1-K5“ z informacijo, da je izvzetje iz člena 4(4) Direktive 2001/80/ES veljalo le za en kotel, in s predložitvijo podrobnega tehničnega opisa vseh sprememb v zvezi z navedenim kotlom med njegovo prenovo leta 2010.
This made clear that in 2010 an entirely new boiler had been constructed within the plant ‘U.S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., boilers K1-K5’ following the complete dismantling and replacement of the boiler that had previously been subject to the derogation under Article 4(4) of Directive 2001/80/EC.
Tako je bilo pojasnjeno, da je bil leta 2010 v napravi „U.S. Steel Košice, s.r.o., boilers K1-K5“ po popolni odstranitvi in nadomestitvi kotla, za katerega je veljalo izvzetje iz člena 4(4) Direktive 2001/80/ES, zgrajen popolnoma nov kotel.
on the notification by the Republic of Slovenia of a transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions
o priglasitvi prehodnega nacionalnega načrta iz člena 32 Direktive 2010/75/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o industrijskih emisijah, ki ga je predložila Republika Slovenija
(notified under document C(2014) 60)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 60)
Having regard to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) [1], and in particular Article 32(5), second subparagraph thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2010/75/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o industrijskih emisijah (celovito preprečevanje in nadzorovanje onesnaževanja) [1] in zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 32(5) Direktive,
In accordance with Article 32(5) first subparagraph of Directive 2010/75/EU, the Republic of Slovenia submitted to the Commission its transitional national plan (TNP) on 14 December 2012 [2].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 32(5) Direktive 2010/75/EU je Republika Slovenija Komisiji 14. decembra 2012 predložila svoj prehodni nacionalni načrt (PNN) [2].
During its assessment of the completeness of this TNP, the Commission found that the methodology for calculating the contribution to the TNP ceilings for combustion plants including different types of units and/or firing multiple fuels was not correctly applied and that for one plant two different methods were used to establish its contribution to the SO2 ceilings.
Komisija je v svoji oceni celovitosti tega PNN ugotovila, da metodologija za izračun prispevka k zgornjim mejam za kurilne naprave iz PNN, vključno z različnimi vrstami enot in/ali uporabo več goriv, ni bila pravilno uporabljena in da sta bili za eno napravo uporabljeni dve različni metodi za določitev njenega prispevka k zgornjim mejam za SO2.
The Commission also noted that certain conversion factors for calculating the average annual waste gas flow rate were too high and that the TNP did not provide specific measures to ensure that the applicable emission limit values will be met from 1 July 2020 on.
Komisija je ugotovila tudi, da so nekateri konverzijski količniki za izračun povprečne letne stopnje pretoka odpadnih plinov previsoki in da v PNN niso bili navedeni posebni ukrepi za zagotovitev, da bodo veljavne mejne vrednosti emisij izpolnjene od 1. julija 2020 naprej.