natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Monday 26 to Friday 30 May 2014
Od ponedeljka, 26. maja, do petka, 30. maja 2014
Wednesday 4 June 2014
Sreda, 4. junija 2014
Wednesday 24 December 2014
Sreda, 24. decembra 2014
Wednesday 31 December 2014
Sreda, 31. decembra 2014
Wednesday 17 December 2014 to Friday 2 January 2015
Od srede, 17. decembra 2014, do petka, 2. januarja 2015.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1192/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1192/2013
approving the active substance tembotrione, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011
o odobritvi aktivne snovi tembotrion v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet ter o spremembi Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 540/2011
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC [1], and in particular Articles 13(2) and 78(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. oktobra 2009 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet in razveljavitvi direktiv Sveta 79/117/EGS in 91/414/EGS [1], ter zlasti člena 13(2) in člena 78(2) Uredbe,
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, Austria received on 25 November 2005 an application from Bayer CropScience AG for the inclusion of the active substance tembotrione in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS je Avstrija 25. novembra 2005 prejela zahtevek podjetja Bayer CropScience AG za vključitev aktivne snovi tembotrion v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The designated rapporteur Member State submitted a draft assessment report on 7 February 2007.
Država članica poročevalka je 7. februarja 2007 predložila osnutek poročila o oceni.
In accordance with Article 11(6) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 188/2011 [4] additional information was requested from the applicant on 14 May 2012.
V skladu s členom 11(6) Uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 188/2011 [4] so se od vložnika 14. maja 2012 zahtevale dodatne informacije.
The evaluation of the additional data by Austria was submitted in the format of an updated draft assessment report in September 2012.
Avstrija je septembra 2012 oceno dodatnih podatkov predložila v obliki posodobljenega osnutka poročila o oceni.
The Authority presented to the Commission its conclusion on the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance tembotrione [5] on 6 March 2013.
Agencija je 6. marca 2013 Komisiji predložila sklep o pregledu ocene tveganja za pesticide z aktivno snovjo tembotrion [5].
The draft assessment report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 3 October 2013 in the format of the Commission review report for tembotrione.
Osnutek poročila o oceni in sklep Agencije so države članice in Komisija pregledale v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 3. oktobra 2013 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu tembotriona.
It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing tembotrione may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) and Article 5(3) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which were examined and detailed in the Commission review report.
Različne preiskave so pokazale, da se za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo tembotrion, lahko pričakuje, da na splošno izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) ter člena 5(3) Direktive 91/414/EGS, zlasti v zvezi z uporabami, ki so bile proučene in podrobno navedene v poročilu Komisije o pregledu.
It is therefore appropriate to approve tembotrione.
Zato je primerno, da se tembotrion odobri.
Member States should be allowed a period of six months after approval to review authorisations of plant protection products containing tembotrione.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba po odobritvi omogočiti šestmesečno obdobje, da pregledajo registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo tembotrion.
The active substance tembotrione, as specified in Annex I, is approved subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.
Aktivna snov tembotrion, kot je opredeljena v Prilogi I, se odobri v skladu s pogoji iz navedene priloge.
Member States shall in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, where necessary, amend or withdraw existing authorisations for plant protection products containing tembotrione as an active substance by 31 October 2014.
Države članice v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 do 31. oktobra 2014 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo veljavne registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo tembotrion kot aktivno snov.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for each authorised plant protection product containing tembotrione as either the only active substance or as one of several active substances, all of which were listed in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 by 30 April 2014 at the latest, Member States shall re-evaluate the product in accordance with the uniform principles, as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, on the basis of a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC and taking into account the column on specific provisions of Annex I to this Regulation.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 države članice znova ocenijo vsako registrirano fitofarmacevtsko sredstvo, ki vsebuje tembotrion kot edino aktivno snov ali kot eno od več aktivnih snovi, vključenih v Prilogo k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011 najpozneje do 30. aprila 2014, po enotnih načelih iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, na podlagi dokumentacije, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS, in ob upoštevanju stolpca o posebnih določbah iz Priloge I k tej uredbi.
in the case of a product containing tembotrione as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 October 2015 at the latest; or
če sredstvo vsebuje tembotrion kot edino aktivno snov, po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo registracijo najpozneje do 31. oktobra 2015, ali
in the case of a product containing tembotrione as one of several active substances, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 October 2015 or by the date fixed for such an amendment or withdrawal in the respective act or acts which added the relevant substance or substances to Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC or approved that substance or those substances, whichever is the latest.
če sredstvo vsebuje tembotrion kot eno od več aktivnih snovi, registracijo po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo najpozneje do 31. oktobra 2015 ali do datuma, določenega za tako spremembo ali preklic v ustreznih aktih, s katerimi so bile zadevne snovi dodane v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS oziroma s katerimi so bile zadevne snovi odobrene, pri čemer se upošteva poznejši datum.
Commission Decision 2006/586/EC of 25 August 2006 recognising in principle the completeness of the dossiers submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of chromafenozide, halosulfuron, tembotrione, valiphenal and Zucchini yellow mosaic virus — weak strain in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ L 236, 31.8.2006, p. 31).
Odločba Komisije št. 2006/586/ES z dne 25. avgusta 2006 o načelnem priznavanju popolnosti dokumentacije, predložene v podroben pregled zaradi možne vključitve kromafenozida, halosulfurona, tembotriona, valifenala in Zucchini yellow mosaic virus – šibkega seva v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS (UL L 236, 31.8.2006, str. 31).
Expiration of approval
Veljavnost odobritve
CAS No 335104-84-2
št. CAS 335104-84-2
CIPAC No 790
št. CIPAC 790
2-2-chloro-4-mesyl-3-[(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)methyl]benzoylcyclohexane-1,3-dione
2-2-kloro-4-mezil-3-[(2,2,2-trifluoroetoksi) metil]benzoil cikloheksan-1,3-dion
The following relevant impurities must not exceed a certain threshold in the technical material:
Naslednje relevantne nečistoče ne smejo presegati določene mejne vrednosti v tehničnem materialu:
Toluene: ≤ 10 g/kg
toluen: ≤ 10 g/kg
For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on tembotrione, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 3 October 2013, shall be taken into account.
Za izvajanje enotnih načel iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 se upoštevajo ugotovitve iz poročila o pregledu tembotrion ter zlasti dodatka I in II h končni različici poročila, ki jo je Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali pripravil 3. oktobra 2013.
the protection of operators and workers;
zaščito izvajalcev in delavcev:
For tembotrione the conditions of Article 80(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 are fulfilled by Commission Decision 2006/586/EC [3].
S Sklepom Komisije 2006/586/ES [3] je bilo potrjeno, da tembotrion izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 80(1)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1193/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1193/2013
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1194/2013
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1194/2013
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz Argentine in Indonezije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: osnovna uredba) in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
On 27 May 2013, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) decided to impose a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia (‘the countries concerned’) by Regulation (EU) No 490/2013 [2] (‘the provisional Regulation’).
Evropska komisija (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Komisija) je 27. maja 2013 z Uredbo (EU) št. 490/2013 [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: začasna uredba) odločila, da se uvede začasna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz Argentine in Indonezije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni državi).
The proceeding was initiated on 29 August 2012 [3] following a complaint lodged on behalf of Union producers (‘the complainants’), representing more than 60 % of the total Union production of biodiesel.
Postopek je bil uveden 29. avgusta 2012 [3] na podlagi pritožbe, ki je bila vložena v imenu proizvajalcev Unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: pritožniki), ki predstavljajo več kot 60 % celotne proizvodnje biodizla v Uniji.
As set out in recital 5 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 (‘the investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 5 začasne uredbe, je preiskava dampinga in škode zajemala obdobje od 1. julija 2011 do 30. junija 2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obdobje preiskave ali OP).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2009 to the end of the IP (‘the period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do konca OP (v nadaljnjem besedilu: obravnavano obdobje).
Subsequently, all parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of provisional duty (‘the definitive disclosure’).
Nato so bile vse strani obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih sta se nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz biodizla s poreklom iz Argentine in Indonezije ter dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: dokončno razkritje).
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the final disclosure.
Določeno je bilo obdobje, v katerem so lahko vse strani predložile pripombe v zvezi z dokončnim razkritjem.
B. SAMPLING
B. VZORČENJE
In the absence of comments concerning the sampling of exporting producers in Argentina and Indonesia the provisional findings in recitals 10 to 14 and 16 to 20 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb v zvezi z vzorčenjem proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Argentine in Indonezije, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 10 do 14 in 16 do 20 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One interested party requested further information on the representativity of the sample of Union producers, both at the stage of provisional selection as set out in recital 23 of the provisional Regulation and at the stage of final selection as set out in recital 83 of the provisional Regulation.
Ena zainteresirana stran je zahtevala dodatne informacije o reprezentativnosti vzorca proizvajalcev Unije tako v fazi začasnega izbora iz uvodne izjave 23 začasne uredbe kot tudi v fazi končnega izbora iz uvodne izjave 83 začasne uredbe.
The sample of Union producers provisionally selected consisted of 32,5 % of the production of biodiesel in the Union during the IP.
Začasno izbran vzorec proizvajalcev Unije je zajemal 32,5 % proizvodnje biodizla v Uniji v OP.
Following the changes explained in recital 24 of the provisional Regulation the final sample consisted of eight companies covering 27 % of Union production.
Po spremembah, ki so pojasnjene v uvodni izjavi 24 začasne uredbe, je končni vzorec vključeval osem družb, ki so zajele 27 % proizvodnje v Uniji.
The sample was therefore considered to be representative of the Union industry.
Zato se je vzorec štel za reprezentativnega za industrijo Unije.
One interested party claimed that two Union producers that were sampled should be removed from the sample due to their relationship with Argentine exporting producers.
Ena zainteresirana stran je navedla, da je treba dva vzorčena proizvajalca Unije izključiti iz vzorca zaradi njune povezave z argentinskimi proizvajalci izvozniki.
The alleged relationship was examined prior to the imposition of provisional measures and the Commission’s conclusions already published in recital 82 of the provisional Regulation.
Domnevna povezava je bila proučena pred uvedbo začasnih ukrepov, sklepi Komisije pa so bili že objavljeni v uvodni izjavi 82 začasne uredbe.
All of the alleged links between Argentine exporting producers and the two sampled companies referred to above were examined again, and no direct link between them was found such that either Union producer should be removed from the sample.
Ponovno so bile proučene vse domnevne povezave med argentinskimi proizvajalci izvozniki in navedenima vzorčenima družbama, pri čemer ni bila med njimi ugotovljena nobena neposredna povezava, zaradi katere bi bilo treba katerega od zadevnih proizvajalcev Unije izključiti iz vzorca.
The sample therefore remained unchanged.
Vzorec zato ni bil spremenjen.
Another interested party claimed that the Commission’s procedure for selecting a sample of Union producers was flawed, as the Commission proposed a sample prior to initiation of the investigation.
Druga zainteresirana stran je navedla, da postopek Komisije za izbor vzorca proizvajalcev Unije ni bil pravilen, ker je Komisija vzorec predlagala pred začetkom preiskave.
That claim is rejected.
Ta trditev se zavrne.
The Commission did not select the final sample until after the initiation of the investigation and entirely in line with the provisions of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je končni vzorec izbrala šele po začetku preiskave in v celoti v skladu z določbami osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of any other claim or comments, the content of recitals 22 to 25 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih trditev ali pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 22 do 25 začasne uredbe potrdi.
C. PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
C. ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
As set out in recital 29 of the provisional Regulation, the product concerned as provisionally defined is fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoils obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, in pure form or as included in a blend originating in Argentina and Indonesia, currently falling within CN codes ex15162098, ex15180091, ex15180095, ex15180099, ex27101943, ex27101946, ex27101947, 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249097, 38260010 and ex38260090 (‘the product concerned’, commonly referred to as ‘biodiesel’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 29 začasne uredbe, so zadevni izdelek, kakor je bil začasno opredeljen, monoalkilni estri maščobnih kislin in/ali parafinska plinska olja nefosilnega izvora, pridobljeni s sintezo in/ali hidrotretiranjem, v čisti obliki ali mešanici, s poreklom iz Argentine in Indonezije, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex15162098, ex15180091, ex15180095, ex15180099, ex27101943, ex27101946, ex27101947, 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249097, 38260010 in ex38260090 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni izdelek, običajno imenovan biodizel).
One Indonesian exporting producer claimed that contrary to what was stated in recital 34 of the provisional Regulation, palm methyl ester (PME) produced in Indonesia was not a like product to rapeseed methyl ester (RME) and other biodiesels produced in the Union, or soybean methyl ester (SME) produced in Argentina because of the much higher CFPP of PME which means that it must be blended before use in the Union.
En indonezijski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da v nasprotju s tem, kar je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 34 začasne uredbe, metil ester iz palmovega olja (PME), proizveden v Indoneziji, ni podoben metil estru iz oljne ogrščice (RME) in drugim biodizlom, proizvedenim v Uniji, ali metil estru iz sojinega olja (SME), proizvedenemu v Argentini, zaradi veliko višje sposobnosti filtra (CFPP) PME, kar pomeni, da ga je treba pred uporabo v Uniji zmešati.
PME produced in Indonesia is in competition with biodiesel produced in the Union, which is not just RME but also biodiesel made from palm oil and other feedstocks.
PME, proizveden v Indoneziji, konkurira biodizlu, proizvedenemu v Uniji, ki ne vključuje le RME, ampak tudi biodizel iz palmovega olja in drugih surovin.
PME can be used throughout the Union throughout the year, by blending with other biodiesels before use, in the same way as RME and SME.
PME se lahko uporablja po vsej Uniji vse leto, tako da se kot RME in SME pred uporabo zmeša z drugimi biodizli.
PME is therefore interchangeable with biodiesel made in the Union and therefore is a like product.
Na podlagi tega je PME zamenljiv z biodizlom, proizvedenim v Uniji, in je zato podoben izdelek.
Recital 35 of the provisional Regulation states the claim of one Indonesian producer that fractionated methyl esters should be excluded from the product scope of this proceeding.
V uvodni izjavi 35 začasne uredbe je navedena trditev enega indonezijskega proizvajalca, da je treba frakcionirane metil estre izločiti iz obsega izdelkov, ki jih zadeva ta postopek.
The same producer maintained this request in its comments on provisional disclosure restating their argument from prior to provisional disclosure.
Isti proizvajalec je to zahtevo ponovil v pripombah v zvezi z začasnim razkritjem, pri čemer je ponovno navedel argument, ki ga je že navedel pred začasnim razkritjem.
The Union industry however disputed this claim stating that fractionated methyl esters were biodiesel and should remain within the product scope.
Vendar je industrija Unije tej trditvi nasprotovala, pri čemer je navedla, da so frakcionirani metil estri biodizel in jih je treba obdržati v obsegu izdelka.
Following comments received after provisional stage, the decision of the Commission in recital 36 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Na podlagi pripomb, ki so bile predložene po začasni fazi, se odločitev Komisije iz uvodne izjave 36 začasne uredbe potrdi.
Regardless of the fact that various fatty acid methyl esters have different Chemical Abstracts Service (‘CAS’) numbers; that different processes are used to produce those esters; and that they have possible different uses, fractionated methyl esters are still fatty acid methyl esters and can still be used for fuel use.
Ne glede na to, da imajo različni metil estri maščobnih kislin različne številke Službe za izmenjavo kemijskih izvlečkov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: CAS), da se ti estri proizvajajo na podlagi različnih postopkov in da imajo morebitne različne uporabe, so frakcionirani metil estri še vedno metil estri maščobnih kislin in se še vedno lahko uporabljajo kot gorivo.
Given the difficulties of distinguishing one fatty acid methyl ester from another without chemical analysis at the point of importation, and the possibility of circumvention of the duties as a result, with PME biodiesel being declared as fractionated methyl ester made from palm oil, the claim remains rejected.
Ob upoštevanju težavnosti razlikovanja enega metil estra maščobnih kislin od drugega brez kemijske analize na točki uvoza in možnosti izogibanja dajatvam na podlagi tega ter dejstva, da je bil biodizel PME prijavljen kot frakcioniran metil ester iz palmovega olja, je trditev še vedno zavrnjena.
In recital 37 of the provisional Regulation it is mentioned that one European importer of palm kernel oil fatty acid methyl ester (‘PKE’) requested that imports of this product be subject to End Use Relief, or otherwise be excluded from the product scope of this proceeding.
V uvodni izjavi 37 začasne uredbe je navedeno, da je en evropski uvoznik metil estra maščobnih kislin na osnovi olja iz palmovih jeder (v nadaljnjem besedilu:PKE) zahteval, da se uvoz tega izdelka oprosti carine zaradi posebne uporabe ali da se ta izdelek izloči iz obsega izdelkov, ki jih zadeva ta postopek.
The Union industry commented after provisional disclosure on the use of end use relief for imports of PKE and the possibility of circumvention of the duties proposed.
Industrija Unije je po začasnem razkritju predložila pripombe o uporabi oprostitve carine zaradi posebne uporabe za uvoz PKE in možnosti izogibanja predlaganim dajatvam.
They opposed the Commission’s authorisation to use such a scheme for relief of anti-dumping duties due to the fungible nature of biodiesel; biodiesel declared for non-fuel use could be used for fuel as it has the same physical properties.
Nasprotovala je temu, da bi Komisija odobrila uporabo takšne sheme za oprostitev protidampinških dajatev, ker je biodizel zamenljiv; biodizel, prijavljen za uporabo kot negorivo, bi se lahko uporabil kot gorivo, saj ima enake fizikalne lastnosti.
PKE can be used for fuel use; the unsaturated fatty alcohol that is made out of PKE can also be further processed into biodiesel; and the control that Customs can apply on imports under End Use Relief is limited and the economic burden resulting from the use of this scheme remains significant.
PKE se lahko uporabi kot gorivo; tudi nenasičen maščobni alkohol, ki se proizvaja iz PKE, se lahko nadalje predela v biodizel, pri čemer je carinski nadzor nad uvozom, ki je oproščen carine zaradi posebne uporabe, omejen, gospodarsko breme, ki izhaja iz uporabe te sheme, pa ostaja veliko.