natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, in order to enhance the protection of the assets of their participants and those of their clients, this Regulation should require CSDs to segregate the securities accounts maintained for each participant and offer, upon request, further segregation of the accounts of the participants’ clients which in some cases might be available only at a higher cost to be borne by the participants’ clients requesting further segregation.
Ta uredba ne bi smela posegati v nacionalne zakone držav članic, s katerimi se ureja lastništvo vrednostnih papirjev, in v ureditev za ohranitev celote izdaje vrednostnih papirjev.
CSDs and their participants should be required to provide for both omnibus client segregation and individual client segregation so clients can choose the level of segregation they believe is appropriate to their needs.
Da pa bi bila sredstva udeležencev CDD in njihovih strank še bolj zaščitena, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi od CDD zahtevati, da ločijo račune vrednostnih papirjev, vodene za vsakega udeleženca, in na zahtevo ponudijo dodatno ločevanje računov strank udeležencev, kar je lahko v nekaterih primerih na voljo le za višjo ceno, ki jo plačajo stranke udeležencev, ki tako dodatno ločevanje zahtevajo.
The only exclusion from this should be where due to other public policy requirements, in particular in relation to efficient and transparent collection of taxation, a CSD and its participants are required to provide individual client segregation for citizens and residents of and legal persons established in a Member State where, at the date of entry into force of this Regulation, such individual client segregation is required under the national law of the Member State under which the securities are constituted and only for citizens, residents of and legal persons established in that Member State.
Od CDD in njihovih udeležencev bi bilo treba zahtevati, da omogočajo tako ločevanje zbirnih računov za stranke kot tudi ločevanje za posamezno stranko, tako da se lahko stranke odločijo za stopnjo ločevanja, ki po njihovi presoji ustreza njihovim potrebam.
CSDs should ensure that those requirements apply separately to each securities settlement system operated by them.
Edina izjema v zvezi s tem bi morala biti, kadar se od CDD in njenih udeležencev zaradi drugih zahtev javne politike, zlasti v zvezi z učinkovitim in preglednim pobiranjem davkov, zahteva, da zagotovijo ločevanje za posamezno stranko za državljane in rezidente države članice ter pravne osebe s sedežem v tej državi članici, če na datum začetka veljavnosti te uredbe takšno ločevanje za posamezno stranko zahteva nacionalno pravo države članice, v skladu s katerim so izdani vrednostni papirji, in sicer le za državljane in rezidente te države članice in pravne osebe s sedežem v njej.
Without prejudice to the provision of ancillary services, CSDs should not use on their own account any securities that belong to a participant unless explicitly authorised by that participant and should not otherwise use on their own account the securities that do not belong to them.
CDD bi morale zagotoviti, da se te zahteve uporabljajo ločeno za vsak sistem poravnave vrednostnih papirjev, ki ga upravljajo.
In addition the CSD should require the participants to obtain any necessary prior consent from their clients.
Brez poseganja v opravljanje pomožnih storitev CDD ne bi smele uporabljati za lasten račun katerih koli vrednostnih papirjev, ki pripadajo udeležencu, razen če ta to izrecno dovoli, in tudi sicer ne bi smele uporabljati za lasten račun vrednostnih papirjev, ki jim ne pripadajo.
Directive 98/26/EC provides that transfer orders entered into securities settlement systems in accordance with the rules of those systems should be legally enforceable and binding on third parties.
Poleg tega bi morala CDD zahtevati, da udeleženci od svojih strank dobijo vsa potrebna predhodna soglasja.
However, since Directive 98/26/EC does not specifically refer to CSDs that operate securities settlement systems, for clarity, this Regulation should require CSDs to define the moment or moments when transfer orders are entered into their systems and become irrevocable in accordance with the rules of that Directive.
V Direktivi 98/26/ES je določeno, da bi morali biti prenosni nalogi, vneseni v sisteme poravnave vrednostnih papirjev v skladu s pravili teh sistemov, pravno izvršljivi in zavezujoči za tretje strani.
In addition, in order to increase legal certainty, CSDs should disclose to their participants the moment when the transfer of securities and cash in a securities settlement system is legally enforceable and binding on third parties in accordance, as the case may be, with national law.
Ker pa se Direktiva 98/26/ES ne nanaša izrecno na CDD, ki upravljajo sisteme poravnave vrednostnih papirjev, bi bilo treba zaradi jasnosti v tej uredbi od CDD zahtevati, da določijo trenutek ali trenutke, v katerih so prenosni nalogi vneseni v njihove sisteme in postanejo nepreklicni v skladu s pravili navedene direktive.
CSDs should also take all reasonable steps to ensure that transfers of securities and cash are legally enforceable and binding on third parties no later than at the end of the business day of the actual settlement date.
Poleg tega bi morale CDD zaradi večje pravne varnosti svojim udeležencem razkriti trenutek, v katerem bi prenosi vrednostnih papirjev in denarnih sredstev v sistemu poravnave vrednostnih papirjev v skladu z nacionalnim pravom glede na primer postali pravno izvršljivi in zavezujoči za tretje strani.
In order to avoid settlement risks due to the insolvency of the settlement agent, a CSD should settle, whenever practical and available, the cash leg of the securities transaction through accounts opened with a central bank.
Obenem bi CDD morale sprejeti vse ustrezne ukrepe, s katerimi bi zagotovile, da bi prenosi vrednostnih papirjev in denarnih sredstev postali pravno izvršljivi in zavezujoči za tretje strani najpozneje ob koncu delovnega dne na dejanski datum poravnave.
If this option is not practical and available, a CSD should be able to settle through accounts opened with a credit institution established under the conditions provided in Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [14] and subject to a specific authorisation procedure and prudential requirements provided in Title IV of this Regulation.
Da bi se izognili tveganjem poravnave zaradi insolventnosti posrednika za poravnavo, bi morala CDD, če je to praktično in izvedljivo, denarni del posla z vrednostnimi papirji poravnati prek računov, odprtih pri centralni banki.
Banking services ancillary to settlement involving credit and liquidity risks should only be undertaken by CSDs or outsourced to entities authorised to provide the banking services ancillary to the CSD activities as laid down in this Regulation.
Če ta možnost ni niti praktična niti izvedljiva, bi morala CDD imeti možnost, da poravnavo izvede prek računov, odprtih pri kreditni instituciji, ki je bila ustanovljena pod pogoji iz Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [14] ter za katero veljajo poseben postopek izdaje dovoljenja in bonitetne zahteve iz naslova IV te uredbe.
In order to secure efficiencies resulting from the provision of both CSD and banking services within the same group of undertakings, the requirements of this Regulation should not prevent credit institutions from belonging to the same group of undertakings as the CSD.
Pomožne bančne storitve k poravnavi, ki vključujejo kreditno in likvidnostno tveganje, bi morale izvajati le CDD ali pa bi morale biti dane v zunanje izvajanje le subjektom, ki imajo dovoljenje za izvajanje pomožnih bančnih storitev v okviru dejavnosti CDD, kot je določeno v tej uredbi.
It is appropriate to provide for arrangements under which CSDs could be authorised to provide to their participants and to other entities ancillary services from within the same legal entity or from within a separate legal entity which may be part of the same group of undertakings ultimately controlled by the same parent undertaking or not.
Da bi se zagotovila učinkovitost, ki izhaja iz opravljanja tako storitev CDD kot bančnih storitev v isti skupini podjetij, zahteve te uredbe kreditnim institucijam ne bi smele preprečiti, da pripadajo isti skupini podjetij kot CDD.
Where a credit institution other than a central bank acts as a settlement agent, the credit institution should be able to provide to the CSD participants the services set out in this Regulation, which are covered by the authorisation, but should not provide other banking services from the same legal entity in order to limit the settlement system’s exposure to the risks resulting from the failure of the credit institution.
Ustrezno je, da se določi ureditev, v skladu s katero bi lahko CDD v okviru istega ali ločenega pravnega subjekta, ki je lahko del iste skupine podjetij pod nadzorom iste nadrejene družbe ali pa ne, imele dovoljenje za zagotavljanje pomožnih storitev svojim udeležencem in drugim subjektom.
Since Directive 2013/36/EU does not specifically address intra-day credit and liquidity risks resulting from the provision of banking services ancillary to settlement, credit institutions and CSDs providing such services should also be subject to specific enhanced credit and liquidity risk mitigation requirements, including a risk-based capital surcharge which reflects the relevant risks.
Kadar kreditna institucija, ki ni centralna banka, deluje kot posrednica za poravnavo, bi morala biti zmožna udeležencem CDD zagotoviti storitve iz te uredbe, za katere velja dovoljenje, vendar v okviru iste pravne osebe ne bi smela opravljati drugih bančnih storitev, zato da bi omejila izpostavljenost sistemov poravnave tveganju zaradi propada kreditne institucije.
Such enhanced credit and liquidity risk mitigation requirements should follow the global standards for financial market infrastructures and the principles for ‘Monitoring tools for intra-day liquidity management’ published in April 2013 by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
Ker v Direktivi 2013/36/EU niso posebej obravnavana kreditna in likvidnostna tveganja znotraj enega dne, ki bi nastala zaradi opravljanja pomožnih bančnih storitev k poravnavi, bi morale za kreditne institucije in CDD, ki opravljajo takšne storitve, prav tako veljati posebne strožje zahteve za zmanjševanje kreditnega in likvidnostnega tveganja, tudi na tveganju temelječ kapitalski pribitek, ki odraža zadevna tveganja.
Some CSDs also operating as credit institutions are subject to own funds and reporting requirements relevant for credit institutions and laid down in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [15] and in Directive 2013/36/EU.
Takšne strožje zahteve glede zmanjševanja kreditnega in likvidnostnega tveganja bi morale temeljiti na svetovnih standardih za infrastrukture finančnih trgov in načelih za instrumente za spremljanje upravljanja likvidnosti znotraj enega dne („Monitoring tools for intraday liquidity management“), ki jih je aprila 2013 objavil Baselski odbor za bančni nadzor.
Given the systemic importance of such CSDs it is appropriate that the strictest requirements provided in Union law apply in order to avoid the cumulative application of various Union rules, for example in relation to the reporting of own funds requirements.
Za nekatere CDD, ki delujejo tudi kot kreditne institucije, veljajo kapitalske zahteve in zahteve glede poročanja, ki zadevajo kreditne institucije ter so določene v Uredbi (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [15] ter Direktivi 2013/36/EU.
In any areas where potential duplication of requirements is identified, the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) (‘EBA’) established by Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [16] and ESMA should provide an opinion on the appropriate application of the Union acts in accordance with Article 34 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 and of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Zaradi sistemske pomembnosti takšnih CDD je ustrezno, da veljajo najstrožje zahteve, določene v pravu Unije, da bi se izognili kumulativni uporabi različnih pravil Unije, na primer v zvezi s poročanjem o kapitalskih zahtevah.
In addition to the own funds requirements provided for in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and in Directive 2013/36/EU, credit institutions and CSDs should be subject to a capital surcharge that reflects the risks, such as credit and liquidity risks, resulting from the provision of intra-day credit, inter alia, to the participants in a securities settlement system or other users of CSD services.
Za vsa področja, na katerih se ugotovi domnevno podvajanje zahtev, bi Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski bančni organ) (EBA), ustanovljen z Uredbo (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [16], in ESMA morala predložiti mnenje o ustrezni uporabi aktov Unije v skladu s členom 34 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 oziroma Uredbe (EU) št. 1095/2010.
In order to ensure full compliance with specific measures aimed at mitigating credit and liquidity risks, the competent authorities should be able to require CSDs to designate more than one credit institution whenever they can demonstrate, based on the available evidence, that the exposures of one credit institution to the concentration of credit and liquidity risks is not fully mitigated.
Za kreditne institucije in CDD bi se moral poleg kapitalskih zahtev iz Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 in Direktive 2013/36/EU uporabljati tudi kapitalski pribitek, ki odraža tveganja, kot sta kreditno in likvidnostno tveganje, ki so posledica zagotavljanja posojila znotraj enega dne tudi udeležencem v sistemu poravnave vrednostnih papirjev ali drugim uporabnikom storitev CDD.
CSDs should also be able to designate more than one credit institution.
Da bi se zagotovilo popolno spoštovanje posebnih ukrepov za omejevanje kreditnih in likvidnostnih tveganj, bi morali pristojni organi imeti možnost zahtevati, da CDD imenujejo več kot eno kreditno institucijo, kadar lahko z razpoložljivimi dokazi dokažejo, da izpostavljenost ene kreditne institucije koncentraciji kreditnih in likvidnostnih tveganj ni zadostno omejena.
Supervision of the compliance of designated credit institutions or CSDs authorised to provide banking services ancillary to settlement with the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and of Directive 2013/36/EU and the specific relevant prudential requirements of this Regulation should be entrusted to the competent authorities referred to in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
CDD bi prav tako morale imeti možnost imenovati več kot eno kreditno institucijo.
In order to ensure consistent application of supervisory standards, it is desirable that the banking services of CSDs which are of a scale and nature to pose a significant risk to the financial stability of the Union are directly supervised by the ECB under the conditions provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 [17] concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions.
Za nadzor nad tem, ali imenovane kreditne institucije ali CDD z dovoljenjem za opravljanje pomožnih bančnih storitev k poravnavi upoštevajo zahteve iz Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 in Direktive 2013/36/EU ter specifične zadevne bonitetne zahteve iz te uredbe, bi bilo treba pooblastiti pristojne organe iz Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
This Regulation should be without prejudice to Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013.
Da bi zagotovili dosledno uporabo nadzornih standardov, je zaželeno, da bančne storitve CDD, katerih obseg in značaj pomenita znatno tveganje za finančno stabilnost Unije, neposredno nadzoruje ECB pod pogoji iz Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1024/2013 [17] o politikah bonitetnega nadzora kreditnih institucij.
A credit institution or a CSD authorised to provide banking services ancillary to settlement should comply with any present or future Union legislation applicable to credit institutions.
Ta uredba ne bi smela posegati v Uredbo (EU) št. 1024/2013.
This Regulation should be without prejudice to Directive 2014/59/EU and any future Union legislative act regarding the framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions, investment firms and other financial institutions.
Kreditna institucija ali CDD, ki ima dovoljenje za opravljanje pomožnih bančnih storitev k poravnavi, bi morala upoštevati vso sedanjo in prihodnjo zakonodajo Unije, ki bi se uporabljala za kreditne institucije.
In order to provide a sufficient degree of safety and continuity of services provided by CSDs, CSDs should be subject to specific uniform and directly applicable prudential and capital requirements which mitigate their legal, operational and investment risks.
Ta uredba ne bi smela posegati v Direktivo 2014/59/EU in vsak drug prihodnji zakonodajni akt Unije glede vzpostavitve okvira za sanacijo in reševanje kreditnih institucij, investicijskih podjetij in drugih finančnih institucij.
The safety of the link arrangements set up between CSDs should be subject to specific requirements to enable the access of their respective participants to other securities settlement systems.
Da bi se zagotovili zadostna stopnja varnosti in kontinuiteta storitev, ki jih opravljajo CDD, bi morale za CDD veljati posebne enotne in neposredno uporabljane bonitetne in kapitalske zahteve, ki zmanjšujejo njihova pravna, operativna in naložbena tveganja.
The provision of banking-type ancillary services from within a separate legal entity should not prevent CSDs from receiving such services, in particular when they are participants in a securities settlement system operated by another CSD.
V zvezi z varnostjo povezav, vzpostavljenih med CDD, bi morale veljati posebne zahteve, ki bi zadevnim udeležencem omogočile dostop do drugih sistemov poravnave vrednostnih papirjev.
It is particularly important that any potential risks resulting from the link arrangements such as credit, liquidity, organisational or any other relevant risks for CSDs are fully mitigated.
To, da se pomožne bančne storitve opravljajo v ločeni pravni osebi, ne bi smelo preprečevati CDD, da bi prejemale takšne storitve, zlasti če so udeleženke v sistemu poravnave vrednostnih papirjev, ki ga upravlja druga CDD.
For interoperable links, it is important that linked securities settlement systems have identical moments of entry of transfer orders into the system and irrevocability of such transfer orders and use equivalent rules concerning the moment of finality of transfers of securities and cash.
Zlasti je pomembno, da so vsa morebitna tveganja, ki izhajajo iz vzpostavljenih povezav, kot so kreditno, likvidnostno, organizacijsko ali vsako drugo relevantno tveganje za CDD, v čim večji meri omejena.
The same principles should apply to CSDs that use a common settlement information technology (IT) infrastructure.
Za interoperabilne povezave je pomembno, da imajo povezani sistemi poravnave vrednostnih papirjev enake trenutke vstopa prenosnih nalogov v sistem in nepreklicnosti takšnih prenosnih nalogov ter uporabljajo enaka pravila glede trenutka dokončnosti prenosov vrednostnih papirjev in denarnih sredstev.
In order to allow competent authorities to supervise the activities of CSDs effectively, CSDs should be subject to strict record-keeping requirements.
Enaka načela bi morala veljati za CDD, ki uporabljajo skupno infrastrukturo informacijske tehnologije za poravnavo.
CSDs should maintain for at least 10 years all the records and data on all the services that they may provide, including transaction data on collateral management services that involve the processing of securities repurchase or lending agreements.
Da bi pristojni organi lahko učinkovito nadzorovali dejavnosti CDD, bi morale za CDD veljati stroge zahteve v zvezi z vodenjem evidenc.
CSDs might need to specify a common format in which their clients provide transaction data so as to allow this record-keeping requirement to be met, in conformity with any relevant regulatory and implementing technical standards adopted under this Regulation.
CDD bi morale vsaj deset let hraniti vse evidence in podatke o vseh storitvah, ki jih utegnejo opravljati, vključno s podatki o poslih v zvezi s storitvami upravljanja zavarovanja, ki vključujejo obdelavo poslov začasne prodaje vrednostnih papirjev ali posojilnih pogodb.
In many Member States issuers are required by national law to issue certain types of securities, notably shares, within their national CSDs.
CDD bi morda morale določiti skupni format, v katerem njihove stranke zagotavljajo podatke o poslih, da bi omogočile izpolnitev navedene zahteve v zvezi z vodenjem evidenc, v skladu z morebitnimi zadevnimi regulativnimi in izvedbenimi tehničnimi standardi, sprejetimi na podlagi te uredbe.
In order to remove this barrier to the smooth functioning of the Union post-trading market and to allow issuers to opt for the most efficient way of managing their securities, issuers should have the right to choose any CSD established in the Union for recording their securities and receiving any relevant CSD services.
V številnih državah članicah morajo izdajatelji v skladu z nacionalnim pravom nekatere vrste vrednostnih papirjev, predvsem delnice, izdajati v okviru nacionalnih CDD.
Since harmonisation of national corporate law is beyond the scope of this Regulation, such national corporate or similar law under which the securities are constituted should continue to apply and arrangements be made to ensure that the requirements of such national corporate or similar law can be met where the right of choice of CSD is exercised.
Da bi se odpravila ta ovira za nemoteno delovanje potrgovalnega trga Unije in da bi se izdajateljem omogočila izbira najučinkovitejšega načina upravljanja njihovih vrednostnih papirjev, bi morali imeti izdajatelji pravico, da za evidentiranje svojih vrednostnih papirjev in prejemanje vseh ustreznih storitev CDD izberejo katero koli CDD s sedežem v Uniji.
Such national corporate and similar law under which the securities are constituted govern the relationship between their issuer and holders or any third parties, and their respective rights and duties attached to the securities such as voting rights, dividends and corporate actions.
Ker harmonizacija nacionalnega prava gospodarskih družb presega področje uporabe te uredbe, bi bilo treba še naprej uporabljati tako nacionalno pravo gospodarskih družb ali podobno pravo, v skladu s katerim so izdani vrednostni papirji, in določiti ureditev, s katero bi zagotovili, da se lahko izpolnijo zahteve navedenega nacionalnega prava gospodarskih družb in podobnega prava, kadar se uveljavlja pravica do izbire CDD.
A refusal to provide services to an issuer should be permissible only based on a comprehensive risk assessment or if that CSD does not provide any issuance services in relation to securities constituted under the corporate or similar law of the relevant Member State.
Takšno nacionalno pravo gospodarskih družb ali podobno pravo, v skladu s katerim so izdani vrednostni papirji, ureja odnos med izdajateljem in imetniki ali tretjimi osebami ter njihove pravice in dolžnosti, vezane na vrednostne papirje, kot so glasovalne pravice, dividende in druga korporacijska dejanja.
A quick and appropriate remedy should be made available to competent authorities to address any unjustified refusal of CSDs to provide their services to issuers.
Zavrnitev opravljanja storitev za izdajatelja bi morala biti dopustna le na podlagi celovite ocene tveganja ali v primeru, da CDD ne opravlja storitev izdaje v zvezi z vrednostnimi papirji, izdanimi v skladu s pravom gospodarskih družb ali podobnim pravom zadevne države članice.
In view of the increasing cross-border holdings and transfers of securities enhanced by this Regulation, it is of the utmost urgency and importance to establish clear rules on the law applicable to proprietary aspects in relation to the securities held in the accounts maintained by CSDs.
Pristojni organi bi morali imeti na voljo hitro in primerno sredstvo za obravnavanje vsakega primera, ko bi CDD neupravičeno zavrnila opravljanje storitev za izdajatelje.