natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2013 22805, 7 August 2013) showed that the values for heat transfer (radiant heat) under Section 6.2 and heat transfer (convective heat) under Section 6.3 of the above mentioned harmonised standard are not met.
Augustinu (preskus št. 2013 22805, 7. avgusta 2013), je pokazala, da vrednosti za prenos toplote (sevajoča vročina) iz oddelka 6.2 in prenos toplote (konvekcijska vročina) iz oddelka 6.3 zgoraj navedenega harmoniziranega standarda niso dosežene.
Therefore, the following basic health and safety requirements set out in Annex II to Directive 89/686/EEC were not met:
Zato niso bile izpolnjene naslednje osnovne zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz Priloge II k Direktivi 89/686/EGS:
PPE constituent materials and other components,
Sestavni materiali in drugi sestavni deli OZO,
Complete PPE ready for use.
Popolna OZO, pripravljena za uporabo.
As a consequence, the heat protection suit presents the risk of transferring heat during fire-fighting, so that fire-fighters are exposed to life-threatening burns or the risk of being burned to death.
Posledično zaščitna obleka pred vročino predstavlja tveganje za prenos toplote med gašenjem požara, tako da so gasilci izpostavljeni življenjsko nevarnim opeklinam ali tveganju, da zgorijo.
In the opinion of the German authorities, since the relevant basic requirements concerning health and safety protections are not met and no valid EC type-examination certificate has been presented, the heat protection suit cannot be placed on the market.
Ker ustrezne osnovne zahteve za varovanje zdravja in varnosti niso izpolnjene in noben veljaven certifikat o ES-pregledu tipa ni bil predložen, se zaščitna obleka pred vročino po mnenju nemških organov ne sme dajati na trg.
In fact, the heat protection suit does not meet the requirements of the German Order on the placing on the market of personal protective equipment (8th ProdSV) and its use endangers the safety, health and lives of fire-fighters and others.
Dejansko zaščitna obleka pred vročino ne izpolnjuje zahtev nemške uredbe o dajanju osebne varovalne opreme na trg (8.
The Commission wrote to the manufacturer inviting him to communicate his observations on the measures taken by the German authorities.
ProdSV) in njena uporaba ogroža varnost, zdravje in življenja gasilcev ter drugih.
No answer has been received until the date.
Komisija je proizvajalca pisno pozvala, naj sporoči svoje pripombe glede ukrepa, ki so ga sprejeli nemški organi.
In light of the documentation available, the Commission considers that the heat protection suit Hitzeschutzanzug FW Typ 3 failed to comply with clauses § 6.2 and § 6.3 of the harmonised standard EN 1486:2007 referred to the basic health and safety requirements 3.6.1 PPE constituent materials and other components and 3.6.2 Complete PPE ready for use set out in Annex II to Directive 89/686/EEC,
Doslej ni prejela nobenega odgovora.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Glede na razpoložljivo dokumentacijo Komisija meni, da zaščitna obleka pred vročino z nazivom Hitzeschutzanzug FW Typ 3 ne izpolnjuje določil oddelkov 6.2 in 6.3 harmoniziranega standarda EN 1486:2007, ki se nanašajo na osnovne zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve iz poglavij 3.6.1 Sestavni materiali in drugi sestavni deli OZO in 3.6.2 Popolna OZO, pripravljena za uporabo, določene v Prilogi II k Direktivi 89/686/EGS–
The measure taken by the German authorities, consisting of withdrawal from the market and prohibition of placing on the market of heat protection suits Hitzeschutzanzug FW Typ 3 manufactured by KONTEX Textile Hitze- und Isolierprodukte GmbH, is justified.
Člen 1
Article 2
Ukrep, ki so ga sprejeli nemški organi ter zadeva umik s trga in prepoved dajanja na trg zaščitne obleke pred vročino z nazivom Hitzeschutzanzug FW Typ 3, ki ga izdeluje družba KONTEX Textile Hitze- und Isolierprodukte GmbH, je upravičen.
of 16 October 2014
z dne 16. oktobra 2014
laying down rules for the implementation of Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism and repealing Commission Decisions 2004/277/EC, Euratom and 2007/606/EC, Euratom
o določitvi pravil za izvajanje Sklepa št. 1313/2013/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o mehanizmu Unije na področju civilne zaščite ter razveljavitvi odločb Komisije 2004/277/ES, Euratom in 2007/606/ES, Euratom
(notified under document C(2014) 7489)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 7489)
Having regard to Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism [1], and in particular Article 32(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1313/2013/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o mehanizmu Unije na področju civilne zaščite [1] in zlasti člena 32(1) Sklepa,
The general objective of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (‘Union Mechanism’) is to strengthen the cooperation between the Union and the Member States and to facilitate coordination in the field of civil protection in order to improve the effectiveness of systems for preventing, preparing for and responding to natural and man-made disasters.
Mehanizem Unije na področju civilne zaščite (v nadaljnjem besedilu: mehanizem Unije) je na splošno namenjen krepitvi sodelovanja med Unijo in državami članicami na področju civilne zaščite ter olajševanju usklajevanja na tem področju, da bi se izboljšala učinkovitost sistemov za preprečevanje naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek, ter za pripravljenost in odziv nanje.
As disasters can strike at any time, the Emergency Response Coordination Centre (ERCC) established under Article 7 of Decision No 1313/2013/EU should ensure at all times close contact with the contact points of Member States.
Nesreče se lahko zgodijo kadar koli, zato mora Center za usklajevanje nujnega odziva („Emergency Response Coordination Centre“, v nadaljnjem besedilu: ERCC), ustanovljen v skladu s členom 7 Sklepa št. 1313/2013/EU, stalno vzdrževati tesne stike s kontaktnimi točkami držav članic.
The Common Emergency Communication and Information System (CECIS) is an essential element of the Union Mechanism because it should guarantee authenticity, integrity and confidentiality of information exchanged among the Member States under routine conditions as well as in emergencies.
Osnovni sestavni del mehanizma Unije je skupni komunikacijski in informacijski sistem za nujne primere („Common Emergency Communication and Information System“, v nadaljnjem besedilu: sistem CECIS), saj mora zagotavljati verodostojnost, celovitost in zaupnost podatkov, ki jih vsakodnevno in ob nesrečah izmenjujejo države članice.
A separate version of CECIS providing access to the secretariats of the regional sea conventions and third countries sharing a regional sea basin with the Union should be created in view of the specificities of the response to marine pollution incidents.
Zaradi posebnosti odzivanja na dogodke onesnaženja morskega okolja bi bilo treba ustvariti posebno različico sistema CECIS, ki bo zagotavljala dostop sekretariatom konvencij o regionalnih morjih in tretjim državam, ki si regionalni morski bazen delijo z Unijo.
In order to ensure operational effectiveness, minimum requirements should be defined for the modules, other response capacities and experts identified in accordance with Article 9(1) of Decision No 1313/2013/EU, as well as for their operational requirements, functioning, and interoperability, as provided for in Article 9(2) of Decision No 1313/2013/EU.
Za zagotovitev operativne učinkovitosti bi bilo treba opredeliti minimalne zahteve za module ter določiti druge odzivne zmogljivosti in strokovnjake v skladu s členom 9(1) Sklepa št. 1313/2013/EU, pa tudi njihove operativne zahteve glede delovanja in interoperabilnosti, kot je določeno v členu 9(2) Sklepa št. 1313/2013/EU.
In particular, modules should be capable of working self-sufficiently for a given period of time, be quick to deploy, and interoperable.
Zlasti moduli bi morali biti sposobni določeno časovno obdobje delovati samozadostno, biti pripravljeni na hitro napotitev in biti interoperabilni.
In order to enhance the interoperability of modules, measures are needed at Union and Member State levels.
Za povečanje interoperabilnosti modulov so potrebni ukrepi na ravni Unije in držav članic.
The capacity goals for the European Emergency Response Capacity (EERC) should be defined and regularly reviewed in order to have a sufficient number of all necessary types of modules, other response capacities, and experts available for deployments under the Union Mechanism.
Za evropske zmogljivosti za nujni odziv („European Emergency Response Capacity“, v nadaljnjem besedilu: EERC) bi bilo treba opredeliti ter redno pregledovati ciljne zmogljivosti, da bi imeli dovolj vseh potrebnih vrst modulov, drugih odzivnih zmogljivosti in strokovnjakov, ki bi bili na voljo za uporabo oziroma napotitev v okviru mehanizma Unije.
The quality and interoperability requirements should be defined and regularly reviewed to ensure a uniform minimum level of quality and interoperability of all capacities participating in the EERC.
Opredeliti in redno pregledovati bi bilo treba zahteve glede kakovosti in interoperabilnosti, da se zagotovi enotna minimalna stopnja kakovosti in interoperabilnosti vseh zmogljivosti, ki sodelujejo v EERC.
A certification and registration procedure, including self-assessment elements, should be defined to confirm that capacities in the voluntary pool fulfil all necessary requirements and, where necessary, benefit from limited Union co-financing of ‘adaptation costs’.
Določiti bi bilo treba postopek certificiranja in registriranja, vključno z elementi samoocenjevanja, za potrditev, da prostovoljni nabor zmogljivosti izpolnjuje vse potrebne zahteve in je, če je to ustrezno, upravičen do omejenega sofinanciranja Unije za stroške prilagoditve.
This certification and registration procedure should, moreover, ensure an adequate geographic balance of capacities in accordance with the location of risks, and consider the participation of all interested Member States.
S tem postopkom certificiranja in registriranja bi bilo poleg tega treba zagotoviti ustrezno geografsko ravnovesje zmogljivosti v skladu z lokacijo tveganj ter proučiti udeležbo vseh zainteresiranih držav članic.
The identification of possible response capacity gaps of the EERC should allow the Commission and Member States to determine together where adequate capacities are not available inside or outside the voluntary pool.
Komisiji in državam članicam bi morala opredelitev možnih vrzeli v odzivnih zmogljivostih v EERC omogočiti, da skupaj določijo, kje zunaj prostovoljnega nabora ali v njem ustrezne zmogljivosti niso na voljo.
Member States addressing them individually or through consortia should benefit from limited Union co-financing provided this is cost-effective and confirmed by risk-assessments.
Države članice, ki si prizadevajo za odpravo teh vrzeli vsaka zase ali z združevanjem v konzorcije, bi morale biti upravičene do omejenega sofinanciranja Unije, če je to stroškovno učinkovito in potrjeno z ocenami tveganja.
In order to develop the functioning of the EERC, limited amounts of Union co-financing through framework contracts, framework partnership agreements or similar arrangements should support Member States' access to additional capacities to address temporary shortcomings in extraordinary disasters, i.e. disasters of a nature and magnitude going beyond what can reasonably be expected and prepared for.
Za razvoj delovanja EERC bi morala omejena sredstva sofinanciranja Unije prek okvirnih pogodb, okvirnih sporazumov o partnerstvu ali podobnih ureditev podpirati dostop držav članic do dodatnih zmogljivosti za odpravo začasnih pomanjkljivosti ob izrednih nesrečah, tj. nesrečah, katerih narava in obseg presegata, kar je mogoče razumno pričakovati in na kar je mogoče biti pripravljen.
These capacities should be included in the voluntary pool for deployments under the Union Mechanism.
Te zmogljivosti bi bilo treba vključiti v prostovoljni nabor za uporabo v okviru mehanizma Unije.
The Union Mechanism training programme continues to represent an essential element for the preparedness of civil protection and disaster management personnel deployed in the context of the Union Mechanism.
Program usposabljanja mehanizma Unije je še naprej bistvena sestavina pripravljenosti osebja civilne zaščite in osebja za obvladovanje nesreč, napotenega v okviru mehanizma Unije.
In line with the scope defined in Article 13(1) of Decision No 1313/2013/EU, it should cover prevention, preparedness, and response phases.
V skladu s področjem uporabe iz člena 13(1) Sklepa št. 1313/2013/EU bi moral vključevati stopnje preprečevanja, pripravljenosti in odziva.
The Union Mechanism exercise programme should continue its essential role for the practical preparedness for deployments involving the Union Mechanism and the sharing of lessons learnt from civil protection actions conducted within the framework of the Union Mechanism.
Program vaj mehanizma Unije bi moral nadaljevati svojo bistveno vlogo pri praktični pripravljenosti na napotitve, kar bi vključevalo mehanizem Unije in izmenjavo spoznanj, pridobljenih pri izvajanju dejavnosti civilne zaščite v okviru mehanizma Unije.
The exercise programme should be guided by a strategic framework, setting out objectives and roles of exercises under the Union Mechanism, as well as by specific priorities included in the annual work programmes.
Program vaj bi se moral usmerjati s strateškim okvirom, v katerem bi bili določeni cilji in vloga vaj v okviru mehanizma Unije, ter posebnimi prednostnimi nalogami, vključenimi v letne delovne programe.
A systematic, focused and coherent approach for gathering, analysing, disseminating and implementing the lessons learnt, covering the entire disaster management cycle, should be established.
Vzpostaviti bi bilo treba sistematičen, usmerjen in skladen pristop za zbiranje, analiziranje, razširjanje ter uporabo pridobljenih spoznanj, ki bi vključeval celoten cikel obvladovanja nesreč.
In the framework of the Union Mechanism, clear operational procedures for the response to disaster under the Mechanism are important to ensure efficient assistance in case of disasters, including for the relevant international organisations identified in accordance with Article 16(1) of Decision No 1313/2013/EU.
V okviru mehanizma Unije so pomembni jasni operativni postopki za odziv na nesreče v skladu z mehanizmom, da se zagotovi učinkovita pomoč ob nesrečah, tudi za ustrezne mednarodne organizacije iz člena 16(1) Sklepa št. 1313/2013/EU.
In order to allow for a maximum of effectiveness and efficiency of the Union Mechanism, all requests for and offers of assistance should be as specific as possible including all necessary information.
Da bi bil mehanizem Unije kar najbolj učinkovit in uspešen, bi morale biti vse prošnje za pomoč in ponudbe pomoči čim bolj natančne ter vsebovati vse potrebne podatke.
In order to ensure effective coordination of assistance, the ERCC should share its assessment of critical needs and its recommendations for deployments from the voluntary pool with all Member States and develop adequate deployment plans for every request for assistance.
Za učinkovito usklajevanje pomoči bi moral ERCC vse države članice seznaniti s svojimi ocenami kritičnih potreb in priporočili za uporabo iz prostovoljnega nabora ter pri vsaki prošnji za pomoč razviti ustrezen načrt uporabe.
The selection of capacities from the voluntary pool should be based on specific and objective criteria, the priority of which should be assessed in the light of current operational needs.
Izbor zmogljivosti iz prostovoljnega nabora bi moral temeljiti na posebnih in objektivnih merilih, razvrščenih po pomembnosti na podlagi trenutnih operativnih potreb.
In order to improve, where appropriate, the response times under the Union Mechanism, Member States should make necessary pre-arrangements for the deployment of their capacities registered in the voluntary pool.
Da bi se v okviru mehanizma Unije izboljšal odzivni čas, če je to ustrezno, bi morale države članice opraviti potrebne priprave za uporabo svojih zmogljivosti, registriranih v prostovoljnem naboru.
The availability of technical, assessment, and coordination, experts, including team leaders, represents an important element of the Union Mechanism.
Pomemben sestavni del mehanizma Unije je razpoložljivost strokovnjakov za tehnično svetovanje, ocenjevanje in usklajevanje, vključno z vodji ekip.
The tasks and functions of the experts should be defined and the procedure for deploying them should be determined.
Opredeliti je treba naloge in funkcije strokovnjakov ter določiti postopek za njihovo napotitev.
Article 23 of Decision No 1313/2013/EU sets out special provisions to provide transport support in the event of a disaster to facilitate a rapid and effective response with the help of the Union Mechanism.
V členu 23 Sklepa št. 1313/2013/EU so navedene posebne določbe za zagotavljanje podpore pri prevozu v primeru nesreče, da se omogoči hiter in učinkovit odziv z mehanizmom Unije.
It is necessary to establish the rules and procedures for the requests made by Member States to obtain financial support from the Union to transport assistance to the affected country and the handling of those requests by the Commission.
Določiti je treba pravila in postopke, po katerih lahko države članice zaprosijo za finančno podporo Unije pri prevozu pomoči v prizadeto državo ter po katerih navedene prošnje obravnava Komisija.
For reasons of transparency, coherence and effectiveness it is necessary to establish the information to be provided in the requests for transport support and related replies by Member States and the Commission.
Zaradi zagotavljanja preglednosti, skladnosti in učinkovitosti je nujno določiti, katere podatke je treba navesti v prošnjah za podporo pri prevozu ter s tem povezanih odgovorih držav članic in Komisije.
Where Union financial assistance may be provided in accordance with Decision No 1313/2013/EU, Member States should have the choice to request either a grant or a transport service.
Kadar se lahko zagotovi finančna pomoč Unije v skladu s Sklepom št. 1313/2013/EU, bi moralo biti državam članicam omogočeno, da izberejo bodisi nepovratna sredstva bodisi prevozne storitve.
Commission Decisions 2004/277/EC, Euratom [2] and 2007/606/EC, Euratom [3] should be repealed.
Odločbi Komisije 2004/277/ES, Euratom [2] in 2007/606/ES, Euratom [3] je treba razveljaviti.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Civil Protection Committee,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so skladni z mnenjem Odbora za civilno zaščito –
This Decision lays down detailed rules for the implementation of Decision No 1313/2013/EU, as regards:
V tem sklepu so določena podrobna pravila za izvajanje Sklepa št. 1313/2013/EU, kar zadeva:
the interaction of the Emergency Response Coordination Centre (‘ERCC’) with Member States' contact points;
sodelovanje Centra za usklajevanje nujnega odziva (ERCC) s kontaktnimi točkami v državah članicah;
the components of the Common Emergency Communication and Information System (‘CECIS’) as well as the organisation of information sharing through CECIS;
sestavne dele skupnega komunikacijskega in informacijskega sistema za nujne primere (sistem CECIS) ter postopka izmenjave informacij prek tega sistema;
the identification of modules, other response capacities and experts, as well as the operational requirements for the functioning and interoperability of modules, including their tasks, capacities, main components, self-sufficiency and deployment;
določanje modulov, drugih odzivnih zmogljivosti in strokovnjakov ter operativne zahteve glede delovanja in interoperabilnosti modulov, vključno z njihovimi nalogami, zmogljivostmi, glavnimi sestavnimi deli, samozadostnostjo in napotitvijo;
the capacity goals, the quality and interoperability requirements and the certification and registration procedure necessary for the functioning of the EERC, including financial arrangements;
ciljne zmogljivosti, zahteve glede kakovosti in interoperabilnosti ter postopek certificiranja in registriranja, ki so potrebni za delovanje EERC, vključno s finančnimi ureditvami;
identifying and filling gaps in the EERC;
ugotavljanje in zapolnjevanje vrzeli v EERC;
the organisation of the training programme, exercise framework and lessons learnt programme;
organizacijo programa usposabljanja, okvira vaj in programa pridobljenih spoznanj;
the operational procedures for the response to disasters within as well as outside the Union, including identification of relevant international organisations;
operativne postopke pri odzivanju na nesreče v Uniji in zunaj nje, vključno z določanjem ustreznih mednarodnih organizacij;
the process for deploying expert teams;
postopek napotitve strokovnih ekip;
the organisation of support for the transport of assistance.
ter organizacijo podpore pri prevozu pomoči.
‘requester of assistance’ means the Member State or a third country affected by a disaster or imminent disaster or expecting to be affected by an imminent disaster, as well as the United Nations and its agencies and other relevant international organisations as specified in Annex VII;
„prosilec za pomoč“ pomeni državo članico ali tretjo državo, ki jo je prizadela nesreča ali neizbežna nesreča ali ki pričakuje, da jo bo prizadela neizbežna nesreča, pa tudi Združene narode in njihove agencije in druge relevantne mednarodne organizacije, kot je določeno v Prilogi VII;
‘civil protection assistance’ means teams, experts or modules intended for civil protection, with their equipment, as well as relief materials or supplies needed to mitigate the immediate consequences of a disaster;
„pomoč civilne zaščite“ pomeni ekipe, strokovnjake ali module za civilno zaščito, skupaj z njihovo opremo, ter material za pomoč ali zaloge, ki so potrebni, da se ublažijo neposredne posledice nesreče;
‘buffer capacities’ means disaster response capacities, the availability of and rapid access to which are co-financed under Article 21(2)(d) of Decision No 1313/2013/EU;
„zmogljivosti za ublažitev posledic nesreče“ pomenijo zmogljivosti za odziv na nesreče, katerih razpoložljivost in hitra dostopnost se sofinancirata v skladu s členom 21(2)(d) Sklepa št. 1313/2013/EU;
‘intervention team’ means the human and material resources, including modules, set up by one or more Member States for civil protection interventions;
„intervencijska ekipa“ pomeni človeške in materialne vire, vključno z moduli, ki jo vzpostavi ena ali več držav članic za intervencije civilne zaščite;
‘technical assistance and support team’ means the human and material resources set-up by one or more Member States to fulfil support tasks, as referred to in Annex II.
„ekipa za tehnično pomoč in podporo“ pomeni človeške in materialne vire, ki jo vzpostavi ena ali več držav članic za izpolnjevanje nalog podpore, kot je navedeno v Prilogi II.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE COORDINATION CENTRE (ERCC)
CENTER ZA USKLAJEVANJE NUJNEGA ODZIVA (ERCC)
Interaction of the ERCC with Member States' contact points
Sodelovanje ERCC s kontaktnimi točkami v državah članicah
Each Member State shall designate a national contact point for the ERCC available 24 hours a day and seven days a week.
Vsaka država članica določi nacionalno kontaktno točko za ERCC, ki je na voljo neprekinjeno 24 ur na dan, sedem dni v tednu.
The designation shall be made using the ‘Country card template’ set out in Annex I.
Pri določitvi se uporabi „Obrazec izkaznice države“ iz Priloge I.
The ERCC shall maintain close contact with the contact points of Member States for the purpose of carrying out its regular duties and the response operations provided for in this Decision and Decision No 1313/2013/EU.
ERCC vzdržuje tesne stike s kontaktnimi točkami držav članic zaradi opravljanja rednih nalog in operacij odzivanja, kot je določeno v tem sklepu in Sklepu št. 1313/2013/EU.
COMMON EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEM (CECIS)
SKUPNI KOMUNIKACIJSKI IN INFORMACIJSKI SISTEM ZA NUJNE PRIMERE (SISTEM CECIS)
CECIS layers
Sloji sistema CECIS
The CECIS shall include the following three components:
Sistem CECIS sestavljajo trije deli: