natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Subject to special circumstances or specific provisions of the Rules of Procedure providing for a restriction of the length of the documents because of the urgency of the case, written observations lodged in a preliminary ruling should not exceed 20 pages.
Razen v posebnih okoliščinah ali če posebne določbe Poslovnika ne določajo omejitve dolžine pisanj zaradi nujnosti zadeve, naj pisna stališča, predložena v postopku predhodnega odločanja, ne bi bila daljša od 20 strani.
On account of its adversarial nature, the written part of the procedure in direct actions follows stricter rules.
Ker ima postopek pri direktnih tožbah naravo spora, veljajo za pisni del tega postopka strožja pravila.
It is apparent, in particular, from Article 120 of the Rules of Procedure, that the application initiating proceedings must, in addition to stating the name and address of the applicant and the name of the party against whom the application is made, state accurately the subject-matter of the proceedings, the pleas in law and arguments relied upon supported, as appropriate, by any evidence produced or offered, and the form of order sought by the applicant. Failure to comply with those requirements renders the application inadmissible.
Zlasti iz člena 120 Poslovnika je razvidno, da mora tožba poleg imena in naslova tožeče stranke ter navedbe tožene stranke vsebovati natančno določen predmet spora, navajane razloge in trditve, ki so po potrebi podprte z dokazi in dokaznimi predlogi, ter predloge tožeče stranke.
Unless there are special circumstances, the application should not exceed 30 pages.
Posledica nespoštovanja teh zahtev je nedopustnost tožbe, ki naj, razen v posebnih okoliščinah, ne bi bila daljša od 30 strani.
As is apparent from Article 120(c) of the Rules of Procedure, the application must also include a summary of the pleas in law relied upon.
Kot je razvidno iz člena 120, točka (c), Poslovnika, mora tožba nujno vsebovati tudi povzetek navajanih tožbenih razlogov.
That summary — which must not exceed two pages — is intended to facilitate the drafting of the notice, on each case brought before the Court, which must be published in the Official Journal of the European Union in accordance with Article 21(4) of the Rules of Procedure.
Namen tega povzetka, ki ne sme biti daljši od dveh strani, je olajšati pripravo obvestila, ki mora biti v skladu s členom 21(4) Poslovnika objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije za vsako zadevo, ki je predložena Sodišču.
The defence, to which Article 124 of the Rules of Procedure relates, is essentially subject to the same formal requirements as the application and must be lodged within two months of service of that latter.
Za odgovor na tožbo, ki ga ureja člen 124 Poslovnika, veljajo v bistvu enake zahteve kot za tožbo, vložiti pa ga je treba v dveh mesecih od vročitve tožbe.
That time-limit — extended on account of distance by a single period of 10 days — may otherwise be extended only exceptionally and where a duly reasoned request setting out the circumstances capable of justifying such an extension has been submitted within the prescribed time-limit.
Ta rok – ki se mu prišteje enkratno obdobje desetih dni zaradi oddaljenosti – se lahko podaljša le izjemoma, s pravočasno vložitvijo ustrezno obrazloženega predloga, v katerem so pojasnjene okoliščine, ki upravičujejo to podaljšanje.
Since the legal framework of the proceedings is fixed by the application, the structure of the legal argument developed in the defence must, so far as is possible, reflect that of the pleas in law or complaints put forward in the application.
Ker je pravni okvir postopka določen s tožbo, je treba utemeljitev v odgovoru na tožbo, kolikor je mogoče, strukturirati glede na razloge in očitke, navedene v tožbi.
No new plea in law may be introduced in the course of the proceedings unless it is based on matters of law or of fact which come to light in the course of the procedure.
Navajanje novih razlogov med postopkom ni dovoljeno, razen če ti izhajajo iz pravnih in dejanskih okoliščin, ki so se razkrile med postopkom.
The factual and legal background is to be recapitulated in the defence only in so far as its presentation in the application is disputed or calls for further particulars.
Poleg tega se pravni in dejanski okvir spora v odgovoru na tožbo predstavi le, če se njegovemu prikazu v tožbi nasprotuje ali če so potrebna dodatna pojasnila.
As in the case of the application, unless there are special circumstances the defence should not exceed 30 pages.
Prav tako kot tožba naj odgovor na tožbo, razen v posebnih okoliščinah, ne bi bil daljši od 30 strani.
If they consider it necessary, the applicant and the defendant may supplement their arguments, the former by a reply and the latter by a rejoinder.
Če tožeča in tožena stranka menita, da je to potrebno, lahko prva svojo utemeljitev dopolni z repliko, druga pa z dupliko.
Those written pleadings are subject to the same formal rules as the application and the defence but, since they are optional and supplementary, they are necessarily shorter than those documents.
Za ti vlogi veljajo enake formalne zahteve kot za tožbo in odgovor na tožbo, vendar sta – ker sta fakultativni in dopolnilni – nujno krajši kot prvi vlogi.
The framework and the pleas in law or claims at the heart of the dispute having been set out (or disputed) in depth in the application and the defence, the only purpose of the reply and the rejoinder is to allow the applicant and the defendant to make clear their position or to refine their arguments on an important issue, the President also being able, pursuant to Article 126 of the Rules of Procedure, to specify himself the matters to which those documents should relate.
Okvir in razlogi ali očitki, ki so jedro spora, so bili že temeljito predstavljeni (ali izpodbijani) v tožbi in odgovoru na tožbo, zato je edini namen replike in duplike tožeči in toženi stranki omogočiti, da natančneje pojasnita svoje stališče ali podrobneje predstavita svojo utemeljitev v zvezi s pomembnim vprašanjem, pri čemer lahko tudi predsednik opredeli vprašanja, na katera naj bi se replika in duplika nanašali.
Except in special circumstances, a reply or a rejoinder should therefore be no more than approximately 10 pages long.
Zato naj replika in duplika, razen v posebnih okoliščinah, ne bi bili daljši od 10 strani.
Those documents must be lodged with the Registry within the time-limits set by the Court, an extension of those time-limits being granted by the President only in exceptional circumstances and on a duly reasoned request.
Ta akta morata biti v sodnem tajništvu vložena v rokih, ki ju določi Sodišče, podaljšanje teh rokov pa predsednik dovoli samo izjemoma in na podlagi ustrezno obrazloženega predloga.
Where the nature of the case requires it to be dealt with within a short time, the applicant or defendant may request the Court to deal with the case under an expedited procedure derogating from the provisions of the Rules of Procedure.
Če je treba zadevo zaradi njene narave obravnavati v kar najkrajšem času, lahko tožeča ali tožena stranka Sodišču predlaga, da se z odstopanjem od določb Poslovnika zadeva obravnava po hitrem postopku.
Provided for in Article 133 of those Rules, that possibility is nevertheless subject to the lodging, by a separate document, of an express request to that effect setting out in detail the circumstances capable of justifying the use of such a procedure and involves, where such a request is granted, an adjustment to the written part of the procedure.
Vendar je ta možnost, določena v členu 133 navedenega poslovnika, vezana na predložitev izrecnega predloga za to z ločeno vlogo, v katerem morajo biti podrobno predstavljene okoliščine, ki upravičujejo izvedbo tega postopka, posledica pa je – če je takemu predlogu ugodeno – prilagoditev pisnega dela postopka.
The ordinary time-limits for the lodging of written pleadings are reduced, as is the length of those pleadings and, pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure, a reply, a rejoinder or a statement in intervention can be submitted only if the President considers this to be necessary.
Običajni roki za vložitev vlog so namreč skrajšani, prav tako kot dolžina teh vlog, na podlagi člena 134 Poslovnika pa je mogoče repliko, dupliko in intervencijsko vlogo vložiti samo, če predsednik presodi, da je to potrebno.
A direct action may also be accompanied by an application for suspension of operation of a measure or by an application for interim measures, as referred to in Articles 278 and 279 respectively of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’).
Na direktno tožbo se lahko veže predlog za odlog izvršitve ali izdajo drugih začasnih odredb iz členov 278 in 279 Pogodbe o delovanje Evropske unije (v nadaljevanju: PDEU).
In accordance with the provisions of Article 160 of the Rules of Procedure, such an application is however admissible only if it is made by the applicant having challenged the measure at issue before the Court or another party to the case before the Court and it must be made by a separate document stating the subject-matter of the proceedings and the circumstances giving rise to urgency as well as the pleas of fact and law establishing a prima facie case for the measure applied for.
V skladu z določbami člena 160 Poslovnika pa je tak predlog dopusten le, če ga vloži predlagatelj, ki zadevni akt izpodbija pred Sodiščem, ali druga stranka v zadevi, ki se obravnava pred Sodiščem, in se vloži z ločeno vlogo, v kateri so navedeni predmet spora, okoliščine, iz katerih izhaja nujnost, ter dejanski in pravni razlogi, ki na prvi pogled izkazujejo utemeljenost predlagane odredbe.
As a general rule, the application is then served on the opposite party, and the President is to prescribe a short period within which that party may submit written or oral observations.
Predlog se nato praviloma vroči nasprotni stranki v postopku, ki ji predsednik določi kratek rok, v katerem lahko pisno ali ustno predstavi stališča.
In cases of extreme urgency, the President may grant the application provisionally even before such observations have been submitted.
V nujnih primerih lahko predsednik predlogu začasno ugodi, še preden so ta stališča predstavljena.
In such a case, the decision closing the interim proceedings can, however, be adopted only after that party has been heard.
V takem primeru se lahko odločba, s katero se konča postopek za izdajo začasne odredbe, sprejme šele po opredelitvi te stranke.
The written part of the procedure in an appeal is similar in many respects to the conduct of that part of the procedure in direct actions.
Pisni del postopka je glede pritožb z več vidikov zelo podoben poteku tega dela postopka pri direktnih tožbah.
As is apparent from Articles 168 and 169 of the Rules of Procedure (which supplement, in this respect, Articles 56 to 58 of the Statute), an appeal is not brought against a measure of an institution, a body or an office or agency of the European Union, but against the decision of the General Court ruling on an action brought at first instance.
Kot je razvidno iz členov 168 in 169 Poslovnika, ki v zvezi s tem dopolnjujeta člene od 56 do 58 Statuta, se pritožba ne vlaga zoper akt institucije, organa, urada ali agencije Unije, temveč zoper odločbo Splošnega sodišča, ki je odločilo o tožbi, vloženi na prvi stopnji.
It is apparent from that information that the form of order sought in the appeal must necessarily seek to have set aside, in whole or in part, the decision of the General Court as set out in the operative part of that decision, and not the annulment of the measure challenged before the General Court.
Iz tega pojasnila izhaja, da je treba s pritožbo predlagati, naj se v celoti ali deloma razveljavi odločba Splošnega sodišča, kakor izhaja iz izreka te odločbe, in ne akt, izpodbijan pred Splošnim sodiščem.
If they are not to be held inadmissible, the pleas in law and legal arguments relied upon in the appeal — which, unless there are special circumstances, should not exceed 25 pages — must moreover identify precisely those points in the grounds of that decision that are contested and set out in detail the reasons for which that decision is alleged to be vitiated by an error of law.
V okviru pravnih razlogov in trditev, ki se navajajo v pritožbi – ki naj, razen v posebnih okoliščinah, ne bi bila daljša od 25 strani – je treba med drugim natančno opredeliti izpodbijane dele obrazložitve navedene odločbe in natančno navesti, zakaj gre za napačno uporabo prava, sicer je pritožba nedopustna.
In order to facilitate the drawing up of the notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union, in accordance with Article 21(4) of the Rules of Procedure, the appellant must also attach to his appeal a summary of those pleas in law, no more than two pages long, and lodge at the Registry the necessary items and documents attesting that the requirements set out in Article 19 of the Statute and reiterated in Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure are met.
Za lažjo pripravo obvestila, ki se v skladu s členom 21(4) objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, mora pritožnik poleg tega pritožbi priložiti povzetek pritožbenih razlogov, ki ne sme biti daljši od dveh strani, ter sodnemu tajništvu predložiti potrebne listine in dokumente, ki potrjujejo izpolnjevanje zahtev, navedenih v členu 19 Statuta in povzetih v členu 119 Poslovnika.
Within a time-limit of two months from the service upon him of the appeal (extended on account of distance by a single period of 10 days), which may not otherwise be extended, any party to the case at issue before the General Court may submit a response.
Vsaka stranka zadevnega postopka pred Splošnim sodiščem lahko v nepodaljšljivem roku dveh mesecev od vročitve pritožbe – ki se mu prišteje enkratno obdobje desetih dni zaradi oddaljenosti – vloži odgovor na pritožbo.
The content of the written pleadings is subject to the requirements fixed in Article 173 of the Rules of Procedure and, in accordance with Article 174 of those Rules, the form of order must seek to have the appeal allowed or dismissed, in whole or in part.
Za vsebino tega odgovora veljajo zahteve iz člena 173 Poslovnika, v skladu s členom 174 navedenega poslovnika pa je treba v tem odgovoru predlagati, naj se pritožbi v celoti ali deloma ugodi ali naj se pritožba v celoti ali deloma zavrne.
The structure of the legal arguments in the response must, so far as is possible, reflect the pleas in law put forward by the appellant but it is not necessary to reiterate in those pleadings the factual and legal background to the proceedings, unless its presentation in the appeal is disputed or calls for further particulars.
Pravna utemeljitev v odgovoru na pritožbo je, kolikor je mogoče, sestavljena glede na razloge pritožnika, v tem odgovoru pa ni treba vnovič navesti pravnega in dejanskega okvira spora, razen če se njegovemu prikazu v pritožbi nasprotuje ali če so potrebna dodatna pojasnila.
On the other hand, any challenge to the admissibility, in whole or in part, of that appeal must be included in the actual body of the response, since the possibility — provided for in Article 151 of the Rules of Procedure — of raising a plea of inadmissibility in relation to the proceedings by a separate document is not applicable to appeals.
Ugovor glede popolne ali delne nedopustnosti te pritožbe mora biti sestavni del odgovora na pritožbo, saj možnost iz člena 151 Poslovnika, da se ugovor nedopustnosti tožbe vloži z ločeno vlogo, za pritožbe ne velja.
Like the appeal, and subject to special circumstances, the response should not exceed 25 pages.
Tako kot pritožba naj niti odgovor na pritožbo, razen v posebnih okoliščinah, ne bi bil daljši od 25 strani.
If, when the appeal has been served on him, one of the parties to the relevant case before the General Court intends to dispute that court’s decision on an aspect which was not mentioned in the appeal, that party must bring a cross-appeal against the General Court’s decision.
Če želi stranka v zadevi pred Splošnim sodiščem, ki ji je vročena pritožba, izpodbijati odločbo navedenega sodišča glede vidika, ki ni bil omenjen v pritožbi, mora vložiti nasprotno pritožbo zoper odločbo Splošnega sodišča.
That appeal must be introduced by a separate document, within the same time-limit, which may not be extended, as the time-limit for submission of the response and meet the requirements set out in Articles 177 and 178 of the Rules of Procedure.
Nasprotna pritožba mora biti vložena z ločeno vlogo v enakem nepodaljšljivem roku, kot je določen za vložitev odgovora na pritožbo, in izpolnjevati zahteve iz členov 177 in 178 Poslovnika.
The pleas in law and legal arguments which it contains must be separate from those relied on in the response.
Pravni razlogi in trditve, ki jih vsebuje, ne smejo biti enaki tistim iz odgovora na pritožbo.
Where such a cross-appeal is brought, the applicant, or any other party to the relevant case before the General Court having an interest in the cross-appeal being allowed or dismissed, may submit a response, which must be limited to the pleas in law relied on in that cross-appeal.
Če je vložena taka nasprotna pritožba, lahko pritožnik ali vsaka druga stranka v zadevi pred Splošnim sodiščem, na katero se nanaša pritožba, ki ima interes za ugoditev tej nasprotni pritožbi ali njeno zavrnitev, nanjo vloži odgovor, ki je omejen na razloge, navedene v nasprotni pritožbi.
In accordance with Article 179 of the Rules of Procedure, those written pleadings must be submitted within a time-limit, which may not be extended, of two months from service of the cross-appeal (extended on account of distance by a single period of 10 days).
V skladu s členom 179 Poslovnika je treba ta odgovor vložiti v nepodaljšljivem roku dveh mesecev od vročitve nasprotne pritožbe (ki se mu prišteje enkratno obdobje desetih dni zaradi oddaljenosti).
Whether in the case of a main appeal or a cross-appeal, the appeal and the response may be supplemented by a reply and a rejoinder, in particular in order to allow the parties to adopt a position on a plea of inadmissibility or new matters raised in the response.
Tako pritožbo kot nasprotno pritožbo in odgovor nanju je mogoče dopolniti z repliko in dupliko, zlasti da se strankam omogoči, da predstavijo svoje stališče glede ugovora nedopustnosti ali novih elementov, navedenih v odgovoru na pritožbo ali nasprotno pritožbo.
Unlike the rules applicable to direct actions, that possibility is however made subject to the express authorisation of the President of the Court.
Drugače od pravil, ki veljajo za direktne tožbe, je ta možnost odvisna od izrecnega dovoljenja predsednika Sodišča.
To that effect, the appellant (or the party having brought the cross-appeal) is requested to submit, within a time-limit of seven days from service of the response (or of the response to the cross-appeal), extended on account of distance by a single period of 10 days, a duly reasoned application setting out the reasons for which, in that party’s opinion, a reply is necessary.
Zato mora pritožnik (ali stranka, ki je vložila nasprotno pritožbo) v sedmih dneh od vročitve odgovora na pritožbo (ali odgovora na nasprotno pritožbo) – ki se mu prišteje enkratno obdobje desetih dni zaradi oddaljenosti – vložiti ustrezno obrazložen predlog, v katerem je pojasnjeno, zakaj je po mnenju te stranke potrebna replika.
That application — which should not exceed three pages — must be intelligible in itself, without necessitating reference to the appeal or to the response.
Ta predlog, ki naj ne bi bil daljši od treh strani, mora biti sam po sebi razumljiv, ne da bi bilo treba vpogledati v pritožbo ali odgovor na pritožbo.
Due to the special nature of appeals, which are restricted to the examination of questions of law, the President may also, if he grants the application to lodge a reply, limit the number of pages and the subject-matter of that reply and of the rejoinder submitted subsequently.
Zaradi posebne narave pritožbenega postopka, ki je omejen na obravnavanje pravnih vprašanj, lahko predsednik, če predlogu za repliko ugodi, poleg tega omeji predmet in število strani te vloge ter predmet in število strani duplike, ki ji sledi.
The observance of those instructions is an essential condition for the proper conduct of the procedure, and exceeding the number of pages authorised or referring to other questions in the reply or the rejoinder will lead to the pleadings being sent back to their author.
Spoštovanje teh navodil je bistveno za nemoten potek postopka, saj se v primeru prekoračenja dovoljenega števila strani ali navajanja drugih vprašanj v repliki ali dupliki ta vloga vrne avtorju.
The rules set out in points 19 to 26 of these directions are nevertheless not applicable in their entirety to appeals brought against decisions of the General Court dismissing an application to intervene or adopted following an application for interim measures submitted under Articles 278 or 279 TFEU.
Pravila, navedena v točkah od 19 do 26 teh navodil, pa ne veljajo v celoti za pritožbe, vložene zoper odločbe Splošnega sodišča o zavrnitvi predloga za intervencijo, ali odločbe, sprejete na podlagi predloga za izdajo začasne odredbe, vloženega na podlagi členov 278 PDEU in 279 PDEU.
Pursuant to the third paragraph of Article 57 of the Statute, such appeals are subject to the same procedure as an application for interim measures made directly to the Court.
V skladu s členom 57, tretji odstavek, Statuta velja za te pritožbe enak postopek kot za predlog za izdajo začasne odredbe, vložen neposredno pri Sodišču.
The parties are therefore set a short period for the submission of any observations on the appeal and the Court rules on that appeal without any additional written part of the procedure, or even without an oral part of the procedure.
Strankam se zato določi kratek rok za predložitev morebitnih stališč glede pritožbe, Sodišče pa o njej odloči brez dodatnega pisnega postopka ali brez ustnega postopka.
In accordance with Article 40 of the Statute, the Member States and institutions of the European Union, on the one hand, and, in the circumstances provided for in the second and third paragraphs of that article, non-Member States party to the Agreement on the EEA, the EFTA Surveillance Authority, the bodies, offices and agencies of the European Union and any other natural or legal person, on the other hand, may intervene in cases before the Court for the purposes of supporting, in whole or in part, the form of order sought by one of the parties.
V skladu s členom 40 Statuta lahko države članice in institucije Unije, pod pogoji, določenimi v drugem in tretjem odstavku tega člena, pa tudi tretje države, ki so podpisnice EGP, Nadzorni organ EFTA, organi, uradi in agencije Unije ter druge fizične ali pravne osebe intervenirajo v postopku, ki poteka pred Sodiščem, da v celoti ali delno podprejo predloge ene od strank.
To be taken into account, the application to intervene must be submitted within the time-limit referred to in Article 130(1) (direct actions), or Article 190(2) (appeals) of the Rules of Procedure and meet the conditions set in Article 130(2) to (4) of those Rules.
Da se lahko predlog za intervencijo upošteva, mora biti vložen v roku iz člena 130(1) Poslovnika (direktne tožbe) ali člena 190(2) Poslovnika (pritožbe) in izpolnjevati zahteve iz člena 130(2) do (4) tega poslovnika.
If the application to intervene is granted, the intervener receives a copy of every procedural document served on the parties save, where applicable, secret or confidential items or documents, and he has one month from receipt of those documents to submit a statement in intervention.
Če se predlogu za intervencijo ugodi, se intervenientu pošljejo vsi procesni akti, ki so bili vročeni strankam, po potrebi brez tajnih ali zaupnih dokazil ali dokumentov, ta pa lahko intervencijsko vlogo vloži v enem mesecu od prejema teh aktov.
Although that statement must meet the requirements in Article 132(2) of the Rules of Procedure, its content is, however, necessarily more succinct than the written pleadings of the party supported and its length should not exceed 10 pages.
Čeprav mora ta vloga izpolnjevati zahteve iz člena 132(2) Poslovnika, je njena vsebina nujno bolj strnjena kot vsebina vloge stranke, ki jo podpira, in naj ne bi bila daljša od 10 strani.