natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
One cooperating unrelated importer claimed that import prices should have been established on the basis of its imports of the product concerned in the Union.
En sodelujoči nepovezan uvoznik je trdil, da bi se morale uvozne cene določiti na podlagi njegovega uvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo.
However, the data provided by this importer during the investigation only represented a fraction of the total imports in the Union and no meaningful conclusions could be drawn as to the average import price of all imports from the PRC during the whole period under consideration covering several years.
Vendar so podatki, ki jih je ta uvoznik zagotovil med preiskavo, pomenili le delček celotnega uvoza v Unijo in ni bilo mogoče sprejeti nobenih smiselnih ugotovitev glede povprečne uvozne cene celotnega uvoza iz LRK v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju, ki zajema več let.
Another party claimed that the methodology to determine the prices was not explained, in particular as to how the data of various sources had been merged and reconciled.
Druga stran je trdila, da metodologija za določanje cen ni bila pojasnjena, zlasti glede tega, kako so bili združeni in usklajeni podatki iz različnih virov.
In addition it was argued that importation costs should have been based on the verified information collected during the investigation rather than on estimates.
Trdila je tudi, da bi morali stroški uvoza temeljiti na preverjenih podatkih, zbranih med preiskavo, in ne na ocenah.
It is considered that the methodology made available to interested parties is sufficiently complete to understand as to how figures were established.
Šteje se, da je metodologija, ki je bila dana na voljo zainteresiranim stranem, dovolj dodelana, da je mogoče razumeti, kako so bile številke določene.
As far as ‘importation’ cost is concerned, it is clarified that an adjustment was made to on-the-spot-prices to arrive to CIF prices.
Kar zadeva stroške „uvoza“, je treba pojasniti, da so bile cene na kraju samem popravljene, tako da so usklajene s cenami CIF.
The estimation made was confirmed with the data collected during the investigation.
Ocena je bila potrjena s podatki, zbranimi med preiskavo.
Following the provisional disclosure, several interested parties requested more details on the price undercutting calculations than those already provided in recital (116) to the provisional Regulation.
Po začasnem razkritju so številne zainteresirane strani zahtevale več podrobnosti o izračunu nelojalnega nižanja cen poleg tistih iz uvodne izjave (116) začasne uredbe.
Insofar as the sensitive nature of this information and the fact that the Union producers had been granted anonymity would allow it, additional information was provided in bilateral disclosures.
Dodatne informacije so bile predložene v okviru dvostranskih razkritij, kolikor sta to dopuščala občutljiva narava teh informacij in dejstvo, da je bila proizvajalcem Unije zagotovljena anonimnost.
In line with the decision to exclude wafers from the product scope (see recitals (28) to (32) above), these products were also excluded from the calculation of the price undercutting.
V skladu z odločitvijo, da se rezine izključijo iz obsega izdelka (glej uvodne izjave od (28) do (32)), so bili ti izdelki izključeni tudi iz izračuna nelojalnega nižanja cen.
Moreover, there were some corrections on the CIF prices provided by the interested parties.
Poleg tega so bile cene CIF, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, nekoliko popravljene.
As the sample of unrelated importers was revised for the reasons explained in recital (21) the average post-importation costs of the new sample of importers was used, when data was available and complete.
Ker je bil vzorec nepovezanih uvoznikov spremenjen zaradi razlogov, pojasnjenih v uvodni izjavi (21), so bili uporabljeni povprečni stroški po uvozu novega vzorca uvoznikov, če so bili na voljo popolni podatki.
The revised price comparison was made on a type-per-type basis for transactions at the same level of trade, duly adjusted where necessary, and after deduction of rebates and discounts.
Spremenjena primerjava cen je bila izvedena za vsako vrsto transakcije posebej na isti ravni trgovine in po morebitni ustrezni prilagoditvi ter odbitku rabatov in popustov.
The result of the comparison, when expressed as a percentage of the sampled Union producers' turnover during the IP showed weighted average undercutting margins within the ranges of 19,8 % — 32,1 % for modules, 4 % — 28,5 % for cells and 8 % — 29 % in overall terms for the product concerned.
Rezultat primerjave, izražen kot odstotek prihodkov od prodaje vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije v OP, je pokazal tehtano povprečno stopnjo nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen, ki je znašala 19,8 %–32,1 % za module, 4 %–28,5 % za celice, na splošno pa 8 %–29 % za zadevni izdelek.
It should be noted that for one sampled exporting producer, a negative price undercutting for cells was established.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bilo za enega vzorčenega proizvajalca izvoznika ugotovljeno negativno nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen za celice.
However, the exported quantities were not significant and can thus not be considered representative.
Vendar pa njegove izvozne količine niso bile velike in se zato ne štejejo za reprezentativne.
One sampled exporting producer contested the source for the adjustment for mono cells to multi cells, without however substantiating the argument.
En vzorčeni proizvajalec izvoznik je izpodbijal vir za prilagoditev vrednosti za monokristalne celice na multikristalne celice, vendar argumenta ni utemeljil.
Indeed no new information or evidence was provided and this claim was therefore rejected.
Ker niso bile predložene nobene nove informacije ali dokazi, se ta trditev zavrne.
In the absence of any other comments with respect to the prices of imports from PRC and on the price undercutting calculations, recitals (113) to (117) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed as amended above.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi s cenami uvoza iz LRK ali izračunom nelojalnega nižanja cen, se uvodne izjave od (113) do (117) začasne uredbe potrdijo, kot so bile spremenjene zgoraj.
Some parties questioned the overall reliability of the macroeconomic injury indicators used by the Commission for the purpose of this investigation.
Nekatere strani so podvomile v splošno zanesljivost makroekonomskih kazalnikov škode, ki jih je uporabila Komisija za namen te preiskave.
They argued that the trends established for a number of these indicators diverged from the trends for the same indicators established for the sampled Union producers.
Trdile so, da se trendi, določeni za številne od teh kazalnikov, razlikujejo od trendov enakih kazalnikov, določenih za vzorčene proizvajalce Unije.
Particular reference was made to Union production, productivity, sales, average labour costs and employment.
Zlasti so izpostavile proizvodnjo Unije, produktivnost, prodajo, povprečne stroške dela in zaposlenost.
As mentioned in recital (121) to the provisional Regulation the macroeconomic indicators were established in relation to all producers in the Union.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (121) začasne uredbe, so bili makroekonomski kazalniki določeni v zvezi z vsemi proizvajalci v Uniji.
In case the same data are compiled in relation to individual Union producers or a group of Union producers (i.e. the sampled Union producers), the trends are not necessarily identical, as e.g. the weight of each company considered is not taken into consideration in such comparison.
Če se zberejo enaki podatki v zvezi s posameznimi proizvajalci Unije ali skupino proizvajalcev Unije (tj. vzorčenimi proizvajalci Unije), trendi niso nujno identični, ker se npr. teža vsake obravnavane družbe v takšni primerjavi ne upošteva.
Therefore, the results of the exercise of comparing the macroeconomic indicators for all Union producers and those for sampled Union producers are not necessarily meaningful and do not allow for the conclusion that the one or the other set of data is unreliable.
Zato rezultati primerjave makroekonomskih kazalnikov za vse proizvajalce Unije in za vzorčene proizvajalce Unije niso nujno pomembni in na njihovi podlagi ni mogoče skleniti, da je prvi ali drugi nabor podatkov nezanesljiv.
In any event, when comparing the trends of the macroeconomic indicators of the Union industry with the consolidated same indicators of the sampled Union producers, differences in trends can be noted for several indicators, such as the production, production capacity, sales volumes, employment and productivity of the Union industry between 2011 and the IP.
V vsakem primeru je pri primerjavi trendov makroekonomskih kazalnikov industrije Unije s konsolidiranimi enakimi kazalniki vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije mogoče opaziti razlike v trendih številnih kazalnikov, kot so proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost, obseg prodaje, zaposlenost in produktivnost industrije Unije med letom 2011 in OP.
For all these indicators, the sampled Union producers performed better than the overall Union industry.
Rezultati vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije v zvezi z vsemi temi kazalniki so bili boljši od rezultatov celotne industrije Unije.
The reason behind is that in the IP many Union producers, not included in the sample, stopped their production or became insolvent, thus having a negative impact on the macroeconomic indicator calculated at the Union level.
Razlog za to je, da so številni proizvajalci Unije, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec, v OP ustavili svojo proizvodnjo ali postali plačilno nesposobni, kar je negativno vplivalo na makroekonomski kazalnik, izračunan na ravni Unije.
One interested party claimed that the conclusion as set out in recital (153) to the provisional Regulation that the analysis of the situation of the Union industry showed a clear downward trend of all main injury indicators was based on data provided by the consultant.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da ugotovitev iz uvodne izjave (153) začasne uredbe, da je analiza položaja industrije Unije pokazala očiten negativen trend vseh glavnih kazalnikov škode, temelji na podatkih, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec.
In this respect, it is clarified that, on the one hand, the macroeconomic indicators, as listed in Tables 4-a to 6-c to the provisional Regulation, were based on data obtained from the consultant and cross-checked when possible with other available sources.
V zvezi s tem je treba pojasniti, da po eni strani makroekonomski kazalniki, ki so navedeni v preglednicah od 4-a do 6-c v začasni uredbi, temeljijo na podatkih, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec in so bili navzkrižno preverjeni z drugimi razpoložljivimi viri, če je bilo to mogoče.
On the other hand, the microeconomic indicators, as listed in the Tables 7-a to 11-c to the provisional Regulation, were based on data collected from the sampled Union producers and verified on-the-spot by the Commission.
Po drugi strani pa mikroekonomski kazalniki, ki so navedeni v preglednicah od 7-a do 11-c v začasni uredbi, temeljijo na podatkih, ki so bili pridobljeni od vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije in jih je Komisija preverila na kraju samem.
It should also be noted that determinant factors for the injurious situation of the Union industry such as the profitability levels of the Union industry, the average sales price in the Union as well as price undercutting calculations were based on data collected from the sampled Union producers and exporting producers as verified on-the-spot.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da odločilni dejavniki v zvezi s škodo industrije Unije, kot so stopnje dobičkonosnosti industrije Unije, povprečna prodajna cena v Uniji ter izračuni nelojalnega nižanja cen, temeljijo na podatkih, ki so bili pridobljeni od vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije in proizvajalcev izvoznikov ter preverjeni na kraju samem.
The above claim was therefore rejected.
Navedena trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
In the absence of any other comments regarding the general methodology of the assessment of the economic situation of the Union industry, recitals (118) to (123) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi s splošno metodologijo za ocenjevanje gospodarskega položaja industrije Unije, se uvodne izjave od (118) do (123) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
AFASE claimed that the production volume established for modules in recital (124) to the provisional Regulation and the production capacity of the Union industry established for modules and cells in the same recital were overestimated and provided data from other sources (i.e. EPIA, IMS and BNEF) showing lower volumes.
Združenje AFASE je trdilo, da sta obseg proizvodnje, določen za module v uvodni izjavi (124) začasne uredbe, in proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Unije, določena za module in celice v isti uvodni izjavi, precenjena, ter predložilo podatke iz drugih virov (tj. EPIA, IMS in BNEF), ki kažejo manjše količine.
The production volume established in recital (124) to the provisional Regulation is based on information covering both publicly listed companies and non-listed companies.
Obseg proizvodnje, določen v uvodni izjavi (124) začasne uredbe, temelji na informacijah, ki zajemajo družbe, ki kotirajo na borzi, in družbe, ki ne kotirajo na borzi.
The development of the Union production as established in recital (124) to the provisional Regulation is in line with the development of Union consumption established in recital (108) to the provisional Regulation.
Razvoj proizvodnje Unije, kot je določen v uvodni izjavi (124) začasne uredbe, je v skladu z razvojem potrošnje Unije, določenim v uvodni izjavi (108) začasne uredbe.
To the contrary the data provided by AFASE on production volumes showed different trends with the Union consumption as established in recital (108) to the provisional Regulation and with the statistics of Union consumption published by the EPIA.
V nasprotju s tem pa podatki o obsegu proizvodnje, ki jih je predložilo združenje AFASE, kažejo trende, ki se razlikujejo od trendov v zvezi s potrošnjo Unije, določenih v uvodni izjavi (108) začasne uredbe, in od statističnih podatkov o potrošnji Unije, ki jih je objavilo združenje EPIA.
As far as production capacity is concerned, the investigation revealed that the findings as set out in recital (124) to the provisional Regulation included the production capacities of companies that filed for insolvency or stopped production during the IP, while they had not sold their production plants and machinery and thus were able to resume production very quickly.
V zvezi s proizvodno zmogljivostjo je preiskava pokazala, da ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (124) začasne uredbe vključujejo proizvodne zmogljivosti družb, v zvezi s katerimi je bil začet stečajni postopek ali ki so v OP ustavile svojo proizvodnjo, vendar niso prodale svojih proizvodnih obratov in strojev, zato lahko v kratkem času spet začnejo s proizvodnjo.
Likewise, as mentioned above in recital (182), the figures in recital (124) to the provisional Regulation included data from non-listed companies.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (182), so številke v uvodni izjavi (124) začasne uredbe podobno vključevale podatke družb, ki ne kotirajo na borzi.
Finally, as mentioned above in recital (137) above, the data provided by the independent consultant were verified and found to be reasonably accurate.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (137), so bili nazadnje podatki, ki jih je zagotovil neodvisni svetovalec, preverjeni in ugotovljeno je bilo, da so sprejemljivo točni.
On the basis of the above, the data provided by AFASE based on other available sources were not found to be necessarily in contradiction with the provisional findings.
Na podlagi navedenega se sklene, da podatki, ki jih je zagotovilo združenje AFASE in temeljijo na drugih razpoložljivih virih, niso nujno v nasprotju z začasnimi ugotovitvami.
In any event, accepting the figures provided by AFASE would not have an impact on the overall finding that the Union industry suffered material injury as the negative trend of these indicators, i.e. Union production and Union production capacity would be even more pronounced.
V vsakem primeru sprejetje podatkov, ki jih je zagotovilo združenje AFASE, ne bi vplivalo na splošno ugotovitev, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo, saj bi bili negativni trendi teh kazalnikov, tj. proizvodnje in proizvodne zmogljivosti Unije, še bolj izraziti.
One cooperating unrelated importer argued that production volume, production capacity and capacity utilisation should have been established on the basis of the data of the sampled Union producers only.
Eden od sodelujočih nepovezanih uvoznikov je trdil, da bi bilo treba obseg proizvodnje, proizvodno zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti določiti izključno na podlagi podatkov vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
However as these are macroeconomic indicators they should be established at the level of all Union producers in order to establish a meaningful and complete picture of the situation of the Union industry.
Ker pa so to makroekonomski kazalniki, jih je treba določiti na ravni vseh proizvajalcev Unije, da se ustvari smiselna in popolna slika položaja industrije Unije.
After final disclosure, one party requested the Commission to clarify how the annual Union production had been calculated by the consultant.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena stran zahtevala, da Komisija pojasni, kako je svetovalec izračunal letno proizvodnjo Unije.
Another party requested the Commission to give further explanations concerning the reconciliation of the different data available related to the total Union production capacity.
Druga stran je zahtevala, da Komisija posreduje dodatna pojasnila o usklajevanju različnih dostopnih podatkov o celotni proizvodni zmogljivosti Unije.
Another party suggested that the total Union production and production capacity should have been obtained from the Union producers selected in the sample as this would have given a more reliable result.
Še ena stran je predlagala, da bi bilo treba podatke o celotni proizvodnji in proizvodnji zmogljivosti Unije pridobiti od izbranih proizvajalcev Unije v vzorcu, saj bi tako bilo mogoče dobiti zanesljivejši rezultat.
In this regard, it was alleged that publicly available data were imprecise due to the confidential character of these data and that any research centre or consultant had to base its analysis on a number of estimations and assumptions.
V zvezi s tem se je trdilo, da so bili javno dostopni podatki nenatančni zaradi zaupnega značaja teh podatkov in da so raziskovalna središča ali svetovalci morali utemeljiti svojo analizo na številnih ocenah in predpostavkah.
It is clarified that the annual Union production was calculated on the basis of the figures reported by the Union producers to the consultant.
Jasno je, da je bila letna proizvodnja Unije izračunana na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih svetovalcu posredovali proizvajalci Unije.
When the annual production of a certain Union producer could not be obtained for a specific year, this was estimated by applying the capacity utilisation rate from the previous year to the new production capacity of that year.
Kadar podatkov o letni proizvodnji določenega proizvajalca Unije za določeno leto ni bilo mogoče pridobiti, se je ta ocenila tako, da se je stopnja izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti iz prejšnjega leta uporabila za določitev nove proizvodne zmogljivosti v zadevnem letu.
The Institutions have also compared the figure obtained by the consultant with the figures reported in the replies of the Union industry to the standing questionnaires prior to initiation.
Institucije so tudi primerjale podatek, ki so ga pridobile od svetovalca, s podatki, ki jih je industrija Unije pred začetkom posredovala v odgovorih na stalne vprašalnike.
Both figures are similar.
Podatka sta podobna.
As regards the request to provide further explanations concerning the reconciliation of the different data available for Union production capacity, it is noted that this information had already been provided in the open file open for inspection to the interested parties.
Glede zahteve za predložitev nadaljnjih pojasnil o usklajevanju različnih dostopnih podatkov o proizvodni zmogljivosti Unije je treba opozoriti, da so bile te informacije že posredovane v dokumentaciji, ki je na voljo zainteresiranim stranem.
Therefore, this request was rejected.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
Finally, the Union production and production capacity are macroeconomic indicators and therefore have to be established at the level of the entire Union industry rather than on the level of the sampled Union producers.
Proizvodnja in proizvodna zmogljivost Unije sta tudi makroekonomska kazalnika, zato ju je treba določiti na ravni celotne industrije Unije in ne na ravni vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije.
After final disclosure, one party argued that the methodology used to collect production data (mainly interviews and visits of production sites) did not allow for reliable results due to the confidential character of these data and as a consequence the reluctance of companies to disclose them.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena stran trdila, da metodologija, s katero so se zbirali podatki o proizvodnji (predvsem intervjuji in obiski proizvodnih lokacij), ni zagotovila zanesljivih rezultatov zaradi zaupnega značaja teh podatkov in posledične nepripravljenosti podjetij, da jih razkrije.
Such methodology cannot therefore be considered as adequate.
Takšne metodologije zato ni mogoče šteti za primerno.
This was allegedly confirmed by the fact that although a much higher number of Union producers was used by the consultant than the one taken into account by the Commission during the examination of standing at initiation stage, the total production volume established by the consultant is lower than the total production volume established by the Commission for the purpose of the examination of the standing.
To naj bi potrjevalo dejstvo, da je celoten obseg proizvodnje, ki ga je določil svetovalec, kljub temu da je pri proučitvi stanja v začetni fazi upošteval precej višje število proizvajalcev Unije kot ga je upoštevala Komisija, nižji od celotnega obsega proizvodnje, ki ga je določila Komisija za namen proučitve stanja.
This party further claimed that consequently the information related to this injury indicator cannot be considered as positive evidence within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation.
Ta stran je tudi trdila, da informacij, povezanih s tem kazalnikom škode, zaradi tega ni mogoče šteti za pozitiven dokaz v smislu člena 3(2) osnovne uredbe.
It is first clarified that the number of producers taken into consideration by the consultant on the one hand and the Commission on the other hand was largely the same and that the argument that results were inconsistent had therefore to be rejected.
Najprej je pojasnjeno, da je bilo število proizvajalcev, ki jih je upošteval svetovalec na eni strani in Komisija na drugi, v glavnem enako in da je treba trditev, da so rezultati nedosledni, zato zavrniti.
It is further recalled that the data collected by the consultant were cross checked with other sources wherever possible and it was found that the estimations were sufficiently reliable.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da so bili podatki, ki jih je zbral svetovalec, navzkrižno preverjeni z drugimi viri, kjer je bilo to mogoče, in da je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile ocene dovolj zanesljive.
It is therefore confirmed that the information on production data provided by the consultant was considered as positive evidence within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je potrjeno, da so se informacije o podatkih o proizvodnji, ki jih je posredoval svetovalec, štele za pozitiven dokaz v smislu člena 3(2) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of any other comments regarding production, production capacity and capacity utilisation, recitals (124) to (128) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi s proizvodnjo, proizvodno zmogljivostjo in izkoriščenostjo zmogljivosti, se uvodne izjave od (124) do (128) začasne uredbe potrdijo.