natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They reiterated that market conditions of the product under investigation differ per Member State and that therefore the causation analysis should be made at the level of each Member State separately.
Ponovno so poudarile, da so se tržne razmere za izdelek v preiskavi razlikovale glede na državo članico in da je analizo vzročne zveze zato treba opraviti na ravni vsake države članice posebej.
In addition, these parties argued that the national support schemes, the sun exposure and the electricity prices (including regulatory charges) differ per Member State and that furthermore there are different market segments in each market (the residential- installations of less than 40 kW, commercial and industrial- installations between 40 kW and 1MW and the utility market segment- installations between 1 MW and 10 MW).
Poleg tega so te zainteresirane strani trdile, da se nacionalne sheme podpore, izpostavljenost soncu in cene električne energije (vključno z regulatornimi dajatvami) med državami razlikujejo in da poleg tega na vsakem trgu obstajajo različni tržni segmenti (stanovanjske naprave z manj kot 40 kW, trgovinske in industrijske naprave s 40 kW in 1 MW ter naprave za tržni segment javne porabe z 1 MW–10 MW).
In view of this they claimed that the causation analysis should be conducted separately for each Member State on the one hand and for the large-scale and the residential segments on the other hand.
Glede na to so trdile, da bi bilo treba analizo vzročne zveze opraviti ločeno za vsako državo članico ter za segmente večjih in stanovanjskih naprav posebej.
After the final disclosure some interested parties reiterated their claim that the causation analysis should be conducted on a per Member State basis, without however providing further arguments or new evidence in this respect.
Po dokončnem razkritju so nekatere zainteresirane strani ponovile svojo trditev, da bi bilo treba analizo vzročne zveze opraviti ločeno za vsako državo članico, vendar tega niso dodatno utemeljile ali podprle z novimi dokazi.
The investigation has shown that sales and import prices are similar across the Union.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so prodaja in uvozne cene podobne po vsej Uniji.
It can therefore be considered that there is indeed one market for the product under investigation.
Zato je mogoče šteti, da za izdelek v preiskavi dejansko obstaja en trg.
The investigation did also not reveal that producers in each Member State or region concentrated their activities in this specific market or that the dumped imports concentrated in one Member State or region.
Preiskava prav tako ni pokazala, da proizvajalci v vsaki državi članici ali regiji koncentrirajo svoje dejavnosti na ta določen trg ali da je dampinški uvoz koncentriran na eno državo članico ali regijo.
Moreover, none of the interested parties argued that dumping and injury should be analysed on a per Member States basis which would however be a pre-condition for conducting a separate causation analysis per Member State.
Poleg tega nobena zainteresirana stran ni trdila, da bi bilo treba damping ali škodo analizirati ločeno za vsako državo članico, kar pa bi bil predpogoj za izvajanje ločene analize vzročne zveze za vsako državo članico.
The investigation did not reveal any evidence that this would have been an appropriate approach, in particular given that there were similar prices across the Union of the product under consideration at Union level.
Preiskava ni pokazala, da bi to bil ustrezen pristop, zlasti glede na to, da so se na ravni Unije upoštevale podobne cene izdelka po Uniji.
Moreover, it is noted that the sun exposure can be different in different regions of the same Member States, e.g. Southern France has more sun exposure than Northern France, or different regions within one Member State can have different support schemes (e.g. Belgium) and that therefore the impact of these factors on the demand may vary from one region to another within the same Member State.
Poleg tega se lahko izpostavljenost soncu razlikuje v različnih regijah iste države članice, npr. južna Francija ima več sonca kot severna Francija, ali pa imajo lahko različne regije v isti državi članici različne sheme podpore (npr. Belgija) in da se lahko zato učinek teh dejavnikov na povpraševanje razlikuje od regije do regije v isti državi članici.
However, the differences in the regulatory framework of each Member State and/or region and the differences in conditions such as sun exposure do not warrant a separate causation analysis, and thus separate injury and dumping analysis.
Vendar pa razlike v ureditvenem okviru vsake države članice oziroma regije in različne razmere, kot je izpostavljenost soncu, ne upravičujejo ločene analize vzročne zveze in s tem ločene analize škode in dampinga.
Therefore, these arguments had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba te trditve zavrniti.
Another interested party argued that while other factors are relevant, the national support schemes remain the main factor in determining the demand.
Druga zainteresirana stran je trdila, da, čeprav so drugi dejavniki pomembni, nacionalne sheme podpore ostajajo glavni dejavnik pri določanju povpraševanja.
The same party also contested that grid parity was already reached in some locations arguing that prices of modules increased since the IP while electricity prices decreased.
Ista stran je poleg tega nasprotovala trditvi, da je bila pariteta omrežja na nekaterih lokacijah že dosežena, in trdila, da so se cene modulov po OP zvišale, cene električne energije pa znižale.
It further argued that, in any event, at least in certain Member States, the regulatory, economic and technical conditions do not allow for the connection to the grid and for those Member States it was therefore irrelevant whether or not grid parity was reached.
Trdila je tudi, da v vsakem primeru regulativni, gospodarski in tehnični pogoji vsaj v nekaterih državah članicah ne dopuščajo priključitve na omrežje in da za navedene države članice zato ni pomembno, ali je bila pariteta omrežja dosežena ali ne.
This party however did not provide any supporting evidence for the above allegations.
Vendar ta stran ni predložila nobenih dokazov za zgornje navedbe.
In any event the above arguments confirm that the situation with regard to national support schemes as well as grid parity may be different to a certain extent between Member States.
V vsakem primeru navedene trditve potrjujejo, da se lahko razmere v zvezi z nacionalnimi shemami podpore in pariteto omrežja v različnih državah članicah do določene mere razlikujejo.
However, none of the information submitted was of such a nature as to show that an analysis separately per Member State would be warranted.
Vendar pa predložene informacije niso kazale, da bi bila ločena analiza za posamezne države članice upravičena.
Following the final disclosure, the same interested party reiterated the claim and provided some information allegedly showing the different market conditions per Member State and per segment.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ista zainteresirana stran ponovila trditev in predložila nekaj informacij, ki naj bi dokazovale različne razmere na trgu po posameznih državah članicah in po segmentih.
However, the information submitted could not be considered as conclusive as it consisted of a power point presentation without any supporting evidence, and therefore, did not show that an analysis separately per Member State would be warranted.
Predloženih informacij pa ni bilo mogoče šteti za dokončne, saj je šlo za predstavitev s PowerPointom brez kakršnih koli podpornih dokazov, zato te informacije niso pokazale, da bi bila analiza, ki bi se izvajala ločeno v vsaki državi članici, upravičena.
The claim of this party was therefore rejected.
Trditev te strani je bila zato zavrnjena.
On this basis, it was concluded that an analysis of the causation per Member State and/or region and per segment would not correspond to market reality.
Na tej podlagi je bilo sklenjeno, da se analiza vzročne zveze po posameznih državah članicah oziroma regijah in segmentih ne bi ujemala z dejanskimi razmerami na trgu.
In absence of any other comment in this regard the findings made in recitals (159) and (160) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi s tem, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (159) in (160) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The GOC claimed that the Commission has conducted the causation analysis in an inconsistent manner as the injury analysis was done separately for modules and cells, while the causation analysis did not separate between product types.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da je analiza vzročne zveze, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, nedosledna, saj je bila analiza škode izvedena ločeno za module in celice, medtem ko se analiza vzročne zveze ni izvajala za vsako vrsto izdelka posebej.
In this respect, it is noted that while the injury indicators were indeed shown separately for each product type, the conclusions reached for each indicator refer to the product under investigation as a whole.
Ker so bili kazalniki škode dejansko prikazani ločeno za vsako vrsto izdelka, je treba v zvezi s tem opozoriti, da se sklepi, ki so bili sprejeti za vsak kazalnik posebej, nanašajo na izdelek v preiskavi kot celoto.
It is also recalled that modules and cells are one single product and therefore the causation analysis was conducted on this basis.
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da so moduli in celice en sam izdelek in da je bila analiza vzročne zveze izvedena na tej podlagi.
One interested party contested that there was a sufficient correlation between the dumped imports of the product concerned from the PRC and the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Ena zainteresirana stran je nasprotovala trditvi, da obstaja zadostna povezava med dampinškim uvozom zadevnega izdelka iz LRK in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
It was argued that this would be supported, on the one hand, by the fact that from 2009 to 2010 the Union industry's profit margin for cells significantly increased (from loss making to 12 % profit) while Chinese imports were 36 % lower priced than Union industry's prices and doubled their market share during the same period.
Trdila je, da se lahko to po eni strani podpre z dejstvom, da se je stopnja dobička industrije Unije za celice od leta 2009 do leta 2010 znatno zvišala (z negativnih vrednosti na 12-odstotni dobiček), medtem ko so bile cene kitajskega uvoza 36 % nižje od cen industrije Unije in se je tržni delež tega uvoza v istem obdobju podvojil.
On the other hand, between 2010 and 2011 Chinese imports only gained 6 percentage points of market share, even though consumption increased much more during the same period, while the Union industry realised nonetheless a loss of 36 %.
Po drugi strani pa se je tržni delež kitajskega uvoza med letoma 2010 in 2011 povečal le za 6 odstotnih točk, čeprav se je potrošnja v istem obdobju precej bolj povečala, industrija Unije pa je kljub temu ustvarila 36-odstotno izgubo.
This party argued further that as regards the IP, imports of cells from other third countries were at the same price level as Chinese imports but gained more market share corresponding to the loss of market share of the Union industry.
Ta stran je nadalje trdila, da so bile cene uvoza celic iz drugih tretjih držav v OP na enaki ravni kot cene kitajskega uvoza, vendar je uvoz iz tretjih držav pridobil večji tržni delež, ki ustreza izgubi tržnega deleža industrije Unije.
The investigation showed that there was a constant increase of Chinese market share for all product types over the period considered (17 percentage points for modules, 17 percentage points for cells).
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je kitajski tržni delež v obravnavanem obdobju stalno povečeval, kar velja za vse vrste izdelka (17 odstotnih točk za module in 17 odstotnih točk za celice).
Dumped imports from the PRC increased by more than 300 % for modules and by 482 % for cells.
Dampinški uvoz iz LRK se je povečal za več kot 300 % za module in za 482 % za celice.
At the same time there was a considerable and constant decrease of the Chinese import prices (64 % for modules and, 42 % for cells during the period considered) and in the IP they were significantly undercutting the Union industry's prices.
Hkrati so se cene kitajskega uvoza znatno in stalno zniževale (64 % za module in 42 % za celice v obravnavanem obdobju) in so v OP znatno nelojalno zniževale cene industrije Unije.
In parallel, the Union industry lost market share over the period considered and as described in recitals (153) and (154) to the provisional Regulation all main injury indicators showed a negative trend.
Vzporedno je industrija Unije v obravnavanem obdobju izgubila tržni delež, vsi glavni kazalniki škode pa so pokazali negativne trende, kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah (153) in (154) začasne uredbe.
Therefore it is confirmed that there is a clear coincidence in time between the increase in dumped imports and the loss of market share of the Union industry.
Zato je potrjeno, da je povečanje dampinškega uvoza očitno časovno sovpadalo z izgubo tržnega deleža industrije Unije.
As shown in recitals (161) and (162) to the provisional Regulation, this correlation in time was established for all product types separately.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (161) in (162) začasne uredbe, je bila ta časovna povezava ugotovljena za vsako vrsto izdelka posebej.
In addition, the analysis of the impact of the imports on the Union industry's profit margin separately for each year of the period considered does not lead to meaningful results as the existence of dumping and material injury as well as a causal link between them does not need to be established for each year separately.
Poleg tega analiza učinka uvoza na stopnjo dobička industrije Unije, opravljena ločeno za vsako leto obravnavanega obdobja, ne prinese pomembnih rezultatov, saj obstoja dampinga in materialne škode ter vzročne zveze med njima ni treba ugotoviti za vsako leto posebej.
The correlation between the dumped imports and the material injury is sufficiently demonstrated when analysing the developments over the whole period considered.
Povezava med dampinškim uvozom in znatno škodo je zadovoljivo dokazana z analizo razvoja v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju.
It is also noted that the profitability of the Union industry is one of the factors mentioned in Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation which should be investigated when examining the impact of the dumped imports on the Union industry's situation.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da je dobičkonosnost industrije Unije eden od dejavnikov iz člena 3(5) osnovne uredbe, ki jih je treba proučiti pri presoji učinka dampinškega uvoza na položaj industrije Unije.
The fact alone that the Union industry was profitable during a specific year does not necessarily mean that it did not suffer any material injury.
Samo dejstvo, da industrija Unije v določenem letu ni bila dobičkonosna, ne pomeni nujno, da ni utrpela znatne škode.
Moreover, the loss of the market share of the Union industry does not need to correspond exactly to the increase of the market share of the dumped imports in order to establish a causal link between the injury and the dumped imports.
Poleg tega za ugotovitev vzročne zveze med škodo in dampinškim uvozom ni nujno, da se izguba tržnega deleža industrije Unije točno ujema s povečanjem tržnega deleža dampinškega uvoza.
Finally, other factors (e.g. imports of other third countries or development of the consumption) which could have had an impact on the injurious situation of the Union industry were examined and addressed separately in recitals (164) to (224) to the provisional Regulation.
Nazadnje so bili ločeno proučeni in obravnavani drugi dejavniki (npr. uvoz drugih tretjih držav in razvoj potrošnje), ki bi lahko vplivali na škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, in sicer v uvodnih izjavah od (164) do (224) začasne uredbe.
The coincidence in time of increasing dumped imports in significant quantities, which undercut prices of the Union industry and the increasingly precarious situation of the Union industry is a clear indicator of causation in the present case, as established in recitals (161) to (163) to the provisional Regulation.
Časovno sovpadanje med povečanjem dampinškega uvoza v znatnih količinah, ki je nelojalno nižalo cene industrije Unije, in vse bolj negotovim položajem industrije Unije je jasen pokazatelj vzročne zveze v tem primeru, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah od (161) do (163) začasne uredbe.
The claims with regard to the lack of any correlation between the dumped imports and the material injury suffered by the Union industry were therefore rejected.
Trditve v zvezi z odsotnostjo povezave med dampinškim uvozom in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, so bile zato zavrnjene.
Following the final disclosure, the same interested party continued to contest the causation analysis as the profitability of the Union industry was not analysed specifically in relation to certain years (in particular 2010), but for the whole period considered.
Po dokončnem razkritju je zainteresirana stran nadaljevala z izpodbijanjem analize vzročne zveze, saj analiza dobičkonosnosti industrije Unije ni bila izvedena v zvezi z določenimi leti (zlasti za leto 2010), temveč za celotno upoštevano obdobje.
In this regard, it should be noted that no valid conclusions can be drawn concerning causality by isolating one specific year of the period considered while ignoring the development of the Union industry during the entire period considered and its correlations with the development of the dumped imports.
Glede tega je treba opozoriti, da v zvezi z vzročno zvezo ni mogoče izpeljati nobenih veljavnih sklepov z ločeno obravnavo enega določenega leta v obravnavanem obdobju in sočasnem neupoštevanju razvoja industrije Unije v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju ter njegovih povezav z razvojem dampinškega uvoza.
Such analysis can only lead to a partial picture and no sound conclusions can be drawn therefrom.
Takšna analiza ne more ustvariti celovite slike in na njeni podlagi ni mogoče priti do nikakršnih trdnih sklepov.
Thus, the profitability rates that drove also other financial indicators that the Union industry achieved during 2010, was high because of the particularly strong jump in Union consumption, driven by very generous support schemes, that allowed Union industry to have their strongest sales improvement that same year, but only of a temporary nature and in any event not sustainable for this type of industry.
Zato so bile visoke tudi stopnje dobičkonosnosti, ki so dvigovale tudi druge finančne kazalnike, ki jih je industrija Unije dosegla v letu 2010, in sicer zaradi posebej visokega porasta potrošnje Unije, do katerega je prišlo zaradi zelo velikodušnih programov podpore in zaradi česar je industrija Unije v tem istem letu lahko kar najbolj povečala prodajo, kar pa je bilo samo začasno in v vsakem primeru nevzdržno za to vrsto industrije.
In the absence of further comments concerning the effect of dumped imports, the findings in recitals (159) to (163) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z učinki dampinškega uvoza, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (159) do (163) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Several interested parties made comments following the provisional disclosure with regard to the findings concerning imports from other third countries and reiterated them following the final disclosure.
Več zainteresiranih strani je po začasnem razkritju podalo pripombe v zvezi z ugotovitvami o uvozu iz ostalih tretjih držav in jih ponovilo po dokončnem razkritju.
However, these parties did not bring into light new information and supporting evidence which could have altered the relevant provisional findings.
Vendar pa te strani niso predstavile novih informacij in podpornih dokazov, ki bi lahko spremenili zadevne začasne ugotovitve.
Those parties underlined in particular the volume of imports of cells from Taiwan.
Navedene strani so zlasti poudarile obseg uvoza celic iz Tajvana.
However, the absolute volume of imports of the product concerned from Taiwan (1132 MW) represents only a very small share (less than 5 %) of the overall Union consumption (21559 MW) and compared to imports from the PRC (15005 MW).
Vendar pa absolutni obseg uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Tajvana (1132 MW) predstavlja glede na celotno potrošnje Unije (21559 MW) in v primerjavi z uvozom iz LRK (15005 MW) le zelo majhen delež (manj kot 5-odstoten).
Therefore, imports from Taiwan have, if at all, only marginally contributed to injury of the Union industry, and not broken the causal link.
Zato je uvoz iz Tajvana, če sploh, samo delno prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, in ni prekinil vzročne zveze.
In the absence of any other comments with regard to imports from other third countries, the findings in recital (164) to (167) to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z uvozom iz drugih tretjih držav, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav od (164) do (167) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One interested party claimed that the Commission failed to analyse the impact of the development in consumption.
Ena zainteresirana stran je trdila, da Komisija ni analizirala učinka razvoja potrošnje.
In this regard, it was argued that the imports from the PRC did not capture the entire increase in consumption and that, while in the case of modules the Union industry lost market share between 2009 and 2010, it still increased its profitability during the same period.
V zvezi s tem je trdila, da uvoz iz LRK ni zajel celotnega povečanja potrošnje in da se je dobičkonosnost industrije Unije med letoma 2009 in 2010 povečala, čeprav se je v primeru modulov njen tržni delež v istem obdobju zmanjšal.
Furthermore, it was argued that in 2009 when imports of cells from PRC had only 8 % market share, the Union industry still suffered 8 % loss.
Poleg tega je trdila, da je industrija Unije v letu 2009, ko je imel uvoz celic iz LRK le 8-odstotni tržni delež, vseeno ustvarila 8-odstotno izgubo.
As mentioned in recital (168) to the provisional Regulation, despite the decrease in Union consumption in the IP, the dumped imports from the PRC either maintained their market share (modules) or increased it (cells) to the detriment of the Union industry over the period considered.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (168) začasne uredbe, je dampinški uvoz iz LRK v obravnavanem obdobju kljub zmanjšanju potrošnje Unije v OP ohranil (v primeru modulov) ali povečal (v primeru celic) svoj tržni delež v škodo industrije Unije.
Therefore, it cannot be concluded that the decrease in consumption was such as to break the causal link between the dumped imports and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Zato ni mogoče sklepati, da je bilo zmanjšanje potrošnje tolikšno, da je prekinilo vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Moreover, the investigation showed that as the capacity of the Union industry was in any event much lower than the levels of consumption, the shrinking consumption in the IP could not have had an impact on the injurious situation of the Union industry.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da zaradi dejstva, da je bila zmogljivost industrije Unije v vsakem primeru precej manjša od ravni potrošnje, zmanjšanje potrošnje v OP ni moglo vplivati na škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Another interested party contested that the demand in the Union will continue to exist even in the absence of the national support schemes.
Druga zainteresirana stran je ugovarjala, da bi povpraševanje v Uniji obstajalo tudi v odsotnosti nacionalnih shem podpore.
This party argued that there is a correlation between demand and support schemes and that in the absence of such schemes projects in the PV sector would not be profitable anymore and therefore the demand for solar panels will disappear as well.
Ta stran je trdila, da obstaja povezava med povpraševanjem in shemami podpore ter da projekti v fotonapetostnem sektorju v odsotnosti takšnih shem ne bi bili več dobičkonosni in bi se zato povpraševanje po solarnih panelih povsem ustavilo.