natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore the applicant for a licence for the construction of a new power or research reactor should demonstrate that the design limits the effects of a reactor core damage to within the containment, i.e. the applicant should prove that a large or unauthorised radioactive release outside the containment is extremely unlikely, and that applicant should be able to demonstrate with a high degree of confidence that such a release will not occur.
Pripraviti bi bilo treba poročila o ugotovitvah teh medsebojnih strokovnih pregledov.
More specific arrangements for accident management and on-site emergency response should be required to address the prevention and mitigation of accidents.
Na podlagi rezultatov teh medsebojnih strokovnih pregledov bi morale države članice oblikovati nacionalne akcijske načrte, s katerimi bi se odzvale na vse ustrezne ugotovitve in na svojo nacionalno oceno.
Those should be in accordance and without prejudice to the relevant provisions of the Directive 2013/59/Euratom.
Poročila o medsebojnih strokovnih pregledih bi morala biti tudi osnova za zbirno poročilo o izidu tematskih medsebojnih strokovnih pregledov po vsej Uniji, ki bi jih skupaj pripravili pristojni regulativni organi držav članic.
The licence holder should provide for procedures, guidelines and arrangements that address accidents including severe accidents, that could occur in all operational modes, including full power, shutdown and transitional states, ensuring consistency and continuity between all such procedures and arrangements, and ensuring that they are exercised, reviewed and updated.
Zbirno poročilo ne bi smelo imeti namena razvrščati jedrske objekte glede na varnost; osredotočiti bi se moralo na pripravo medsebojnih strokovnih pregledov in njihove tehnične ugotovitve, da bi se lahko izmenjalo znanje, pridobljeno ob njihovi pripravi.
Those arrangements should also provide for sufficient staff, equipment and other necessary resources.
Da bi še dodatno utrdili medsebojno zaupanje, ki bi moralo prevladati pri medsebojnih strokovnih pregledih, bi bilo primerno, da bi Komisija, ko bi bilo to mogoče, obvestila države članice, kdaj namerava uporabiti rezultate poročil o medsebojnih strokovnih pregledih v svojih dokumentih o politiki.
An organisational structure with clear allocation of responsibilities, and coordination amongst response bodies should be provided.
Obveznosti držav članic, da poročajo o izvajanju te direktive, in obveznost Komisije, da pripravi poročilo na podlagi nacionalnih poročil, bi morale biti priložnost, da se preučijo in ocenijo različni vidiki izvajanja te direktive ter njena učinkovitost.
The stress tests demonstrated the key role of enhanced cooperation and coordination mechanisms between all parties that have responsibilities for nuclear safety.
Na mednarodni ravni je opredeljenih več pomembnih obveznosti poročanja, kot v Konvenciji o jedrski varnosti, katere rezultati bi se lahko uporabili za oceno izvajanja te direktive.
The peer-reviews have proved to be a good means of building confidence, with the aim of developing and exchanging experience and ensuring the common application of high nuclear safety standards.
Poleg tega bi morala ta direktiva določati dodatne zahteve glede poročanja v zvezi z ugotovitvami tematskih medsebojnih strokovnih pregledov jedrskih objektov.
Cooperation on nuclear safety between Members States is well established and can give added value in terms of nuclear safety, transparency and openness towards stakeholders at the European and international level.
Zato bi se morala zaradi poenostavitve zakonodaje in zmanjšanja upravnega bremena zmanjšati zahtevnost obveznosti poročanja držav članic, tako glede pogostosti poročanja kot vsebine poročil.
Member States, through their competent regulatory authorities making relevant use of ENSREG, and building on the expertise of the WENRA, should every six years define a methodology, Terms of Reference and a time frame for Peer Reviews on a common specific technical topic related to the nuclear safety of their nuclear installations.
V skladu s stopenjskim pristopom je izvajanje določb te direktive odvisno od vrste jedrskih objektov na ozemlju države članice.
The common specific technical topic to be considered should be identified among the WENRA safety reference levels or on the basis of operating experience feed-back, incidents and accidents and technological and scientific developments.
Zato bi morale države članice pri prenosu teh določb v nacionalno pravo upoštevati potencialni obseg in naravo tveganj zaradi jedrskih objektov, ki jih načrtujejo ali upravljajo.
Member States should perform a national self-assessment and make arrangements for common peer reviews by other Member States' competent regulatory authorities of their national self-assessment.
Stopenjski pristop bi moral veljati zlasti za tiste države članice, ki imajo le majhen inventar jedrskih in radioaktivnih materialov, na primer pri obratovanju manjših raziskovalnih reaktorjev, ki v primeru hude nesreče ne bi povzročili posledic, primerljivih s tistimi, ki jih povzročijo jedrske elektrarne.
Reports on the findings of those peer reviews should be produced.
Določbe te direktive, ki so neločljivo povezane z obstojem jedrskih objektov, in sicer tiste, ki se nanašajo na obveznosti imetnika dovoljenja, nove posebne zahteve za jedrske objekte ter določbe o pripravljenosti in odzivanju na izredne dogodke na lokaciji objekta, se ne bi smele uporabljati za države članice brez jedrskih objektov.
Member States should establish national action plans for addressing any relevant findings and their own national assessment, taking into account the results of those peer review reports.
Določbe te direktive bi bilo treba prenesti in izvajati sorazmerno glede na nacionalne okoliščine in pri tem upoštevati dejstvo, da te države članice nimajo jedrskih objektov, ter hkrati zagotoviti, da bodo vlada in pristojni organi jedrski varnosti namenili ustrezno pozornost.
The peer review reports should also form the basis of any summary report of the outcome of the Union-wide topical peer review exercise prepared collectively by the competent regulatory authorities of the Member States.
V skladu z Direktivo 2009/71/Euratom morajo države članice vzpostaviti in vzdrževati nacionalni zakonodajni, regulativni in organizacijski okvir za jedrsko varnost jedrskih objektov.
The summary report should not aim to rank the safety of nuclear installations but rather focus on the process and technical findings of the topical peer review so that the knowledge gained from the exercise can be shared.
Odločitev glede tega, kako se sprejmejo določbe iz nacionalnega okvira in s katerimi instrumenti se izvajajo, je v pristojnosti držav članic.
Reciprocal trust should prevail in peer reviews, and it would therefore be appropriate for the Commission, whenever practicable, to inform Member States when it intends to use the results of peer review reports in its policy documents.
V skladu s skupno politično izjavo držav članic in Komisije z dne 28. septembra 2011 o obrazložitvenih dokumentih so se države članice zavezale, da bodo v upravičenih primerih uradnemu obvestilu o ukrepih za prenos priložile enega ali več dokumentov, v katerih bodo pojasnile razmerje med določbami direktive in ustreznimi deli nacionalnih instrumentov za prenos.
The obligations of the Member States to report on the implementation of this Directive and the obligation of the Commission to draw up a report on the basis of the national reports should provide an opportunity to take stock of, and evaluate, the various aspects of the implementation of this Directive as well as its effectiveness.
V zvezi s to direktivo zakonodajalec meni, da je pošiljanje takšnih dokumentov upravičeno.
A number of relevant reporting obligations, such as the Convention on Nuclear Safety reports, exist at international level, the results of which might be used for the evaluation of the implementation of this Directive.
Direktivo 2009/71/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Moreover, additional reporting requirements should be established under this Directive in relation to the findings of the topical peer reviews of nuclear installations.
SPREJEL NASLEDNJO DIREKTIVO:
Consequently, with a view to simplifying the legislation and reducing the administrative burden, the reporting obligation for the Member States should be made less onerous both as regards the frequency of reporting and the content of the reports.
Direktiva 2009/71/Euratom se spremeni:
In line with a graded approach, the implementation of the provisions of this Directive depends on the types of nuclear installations on the territory of a Member State.
naslov poglavja 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Therefore, when implementing these provisions in national law, Member States should take into account the potential magnitude and nature of risks posed by the nuclear installations that they plan or operate.
„CILJI, PODROČJE UPORABE IN OPREDELITEV POJMOV“;
In particular, the graded approach should concern those Member States that keep only a small inventory of nuclear and radioactive materials, e.g. those linked to the operation of smaller research reactor facilities, which in case of a severe accident would not engender consequences comparable to those generated by nuclear power plants.
člen 2 se spremeni:
The provisions of this Directive which are intrinsically linked to the existence of nuclear installations, namely those concerning the licence holder's obligations, the new specific requirements for nuclear installations and the provisions concerning on-site emergency preparedness and response should not be applicable to Member States without nuclear installations.
odstavek 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The provisions of this Directive should be transposed and implemented in a proportionate manner in accordance with national circumstances and taking into account the fact that those Member States do not have nuclear installations, whilst ensuring that nuclear safety receives appropriate attention by the government or by the competent authorities.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za vse civilne jedrske objekte, za katere je potrebno dovoljenje.“;
According to Directive 2009/71/Euratom, the Member States have to establish and maintain a national legislative, regulatory and organisational framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations.
odstavek 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The decision as to how the provisions of the national framework are adopted and through which instrument they are applied rests with the competence of the Member States.
Ta direktiva dopolnjuje temeljne standarde iz člena 30 Pogodbe v zvezi z jedrsko varnostjo jedrskih objektov in ne posega v obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti na področju varstva zdravja delavcev in prebivalstva pred nevarnostmi, ki izvirajo iz ionizirajočega sevanja, zlasti Direktivo Sveta 2013/59/Euratom.
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents, Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the provisions of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments.
člen 3 se spremeni:
With regard to this Directive the legislator considers the transmission of such documents to be justified.
odstavek 1(a) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Directive 2009/71/Euratom should therefore be amended accordingly,
dodajo se naslednji odstavki:
HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
‚nesreča‘ pomeni vsak neželen dogodek z znatnimi posledicami ali morebitnimi posledicami s stališča varstva pred sevanji ali jedrske varnosti;
Directive 2009/71/Euratom is amended as follows:
‚incident‘ pomeni vsak neželen dogodek z nezanemarljivimi posledicami ali morebitnimi posledicami s stališča varstva pred sevanji ali jedrske varnosti;
the heading of Chapter 1 is replaced by the following:
‚neobičajno obratovanje‘ pomeni obratovanje, ki odstopa od običajnega obratovanja in se predvidoma zgodi vsaj enkrat med obratovalno življenjsko dobo objekta, vendar zaradi ustreznih določb o načrtovanju ne poškoduje znatno predmetov, pomembnih za varnost, in ne povzroči nesreče;
‘OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS’.
‚projektna osnova‘ pomeni niz stanj in dogodkov, ki so bili v skladu z uveljavljenimi merili izrecno upoštevani pri projektiranju jedrskega objekta, vključno z nadgradnjami, ter jih objekt pri načrtovanem delovanju varnostnih sistemov lahko prenese, ne da bi bile presežene dovoljene omejitve;
Article 2 is amended as follows:
‚nesreča na projektni osnovi‘ pomeni nesrečo, za katero je jedrski objekt projektiran v skladu z uveljavljenimi merili o projektiranju ter pri kateri so poškodbe goriva, če je to primerno, in izpusti radioaktivnih snovi v okviru dovoljenih mejnih vrednosti;
paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
‚težke razmere‘ pomeni razmere, ki so težje od razmer, povezanih z nesrečami na projektni osnovi;
This Directive shall apply to any civilian nuclear installation subject to a licence.’;
takšne razmere lahko nastanejo zaradi več odpovedi, npr. zaradi popolne odpovedi vseh ravni varnostnega sistema ali ob izredno malo verjetnem dogodku.“;
paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
v poglavju 2 se za naslovom „OBVEZNOSTI“ vstavi naslednji naslov:
This Directive supplements the basic standards referred to in Article 30 of the Treaty as regards the nuclear safety of nuclear installations and is without prejudice to the existing Community legislation for the protection of the health of the workers and the general public against the dangers arising from ionising radiation, and in particular Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom.
„ODDELEK 1
paragraph 1(a) is replaced by the following:
člen 4(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
a nuclear power plant, enrichment plant, nuclear fuel fabrication plant, reprocessing plant, research reactor facility, spent fuel storage facility;
Države članice vzpostavijo in vzdržujejo nacionalni zakonodajni, regulativni in organizacijski okvir (v nadaljnjem besedilu: nacionalni okvir) za jedrsko varnost jedrskih objektov.
the following paragraphs are added:
Nacionalni okvir določa zlasti naslednje:
“accident” means any unintended event, the consequences or potential consequences of which are significant from the point of view of radiation protection or nuclear safety;
opredelitev odgovornosti in usklajevanje dela med ustreznimi državnimi organi;
“incident” means any unintended event, the consequences or potential consequences of which are not negligible from the point of view of radiation protection or nuclear safety;
nacionalne zahteve za jedrsko varnost, ki zajemajo vse stopnje življenjske dobe jedrskih objektov;
“abnormal operations” means an operational process deviating from normal operation which is expected to occur at least once during the operating lifetime of a facility but which, in view of appropriate design provisions, does not cause any significant damage to items important to safety or lead to accident conditions;
sistem za izdajo dovoljenj za jedrske objekte in prepoved obratovanja jedrskih objektov brez dovoljenja;
“design basis” means the range of conditions and events taken explicitly into account in the design, including upgrades, of a nuclear installation, according to established criteria, so that the installation can withstand them without exceeding authorised limits by the planned operation of safety systems;
sistem regulativnega nadzora jedrske varnosti, ki ga izvaja pristojni regulativni organ;
“design basis accident” means accident conditions against which a nuclear installation is designed according to established design criteria, and for which the damage to the fuel, where applicable, and the release of radioactive material are kept within authorised limits;
učinkovite in sorazmerne izvršilne ukrepe, po potrebi tudi popravni ukrep ali prekinitev delovanja in spremembo ali preklic dovoljenja.
“severe conditions” means conditions that are more severe than conditions related to design basis accidents;
Odločitev o tem, kako se zahteve v zvezi z nacionalnimi zahtevami za jedrsko varnost iz točke (b) sprejmejo in s katerimi instrumenti se izvajajo, je v pristojnosti držav članic.“;
such conditions may be caused by multiple failures, such as the complete loss of all trains of a safety system, or by an extremely unlikely event.’.
v členu 5 se odstavka 2 in 3 nadomestita z naslednjim:
In Chapter 2, the following title is inserted after the heading ‘OBLIGATIONS’:
Države članice zagotovijo dejansko neodvisnost pristojnega regulativnega organa pred neupravičenimi vplivi na odločanje o regulativnih zadevah.
‘SECTION 1
V ta namen države članice zagotovijo, da nacionalni okvir predpisuje naslednje zahteve za pristojni regulativni organ:
General obligations’.
je funkcionalno ločen od vsakega drugega organa ali organizacije, ki se ukvarja s pospeševanjem ali uporabo jedrske energije, in pri opravljanju regulativnih nalog ne zahteva ali sprejema navodil od nobenega takšnega telesa ali organizacije;
Article 4(1) is replaced by the following:
sprejema regulativne odločitve, ki temeljijo na trdnih in preglednih zahtevah v zvezi z jedrsko varnostjo;
Member States shall establish and maintain a national legislative, regulatory and organisational framework (“national framework”) for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations.
so mu dodeljena namenska in ustrezna proračunska sredstva in omogočena izvršitev regulativnih nalog, kot so opredeljena v nacionalnem okviru, poleg tega pa je sam odgovoren za porabo dodeljenih proračunskih sredstev;
The national framework shall provide in particular for:
zaposluje ustrezno število osebja z usposobljenostjo, izkušnjami in strokovnim znanjem, potrebnimi za izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti.
the allocation of responsibilities and coordination between relevant state bodies;
V podporo pri izvajanju regulativnih nalog lahko uporabi tudi zunanje znanstvene in tehnične vire ter strokovno znanje;
national nuclear safety requirements, covering all stages of the lifecycle of nuclear installations;
določa postopke za preprečevanje in reševanje morebitnih nasprotij interesov;
a system of licensing and prohibition of operation of nuclear installations without a licence;
zagotavlja informacije v zvezi z varnostjo, ne da bi jih odobrili drugi organi ali organizacije, če s tem niso ogroženi drugi prevladujoči interesi, na primer varnostni interesi, ki jih priznava ustrezna zakonodaja ali mednarodni instrumenti.
a system of regulatory control of nuclear safety performed by the competent regulatory authority;
Države članice zagotovijo, da ima pristojni regulativni organ pravna pooblastila, ki jih potrebuje za izpolnitev svojih obveznosti v zvezi z nacionalnim okvirom iz člena 4(1).
effective and proportionate enforcement actions, including, where appropriate, corrective action or suspension of operation and modification or revocation of a licence.
V ta namen države članice zagotovijo, da nacionalni okvir pristojnim regulativnim organom določa naslednje glavne regulativne naloge:
The determination on how national nuclear safety requirements referred to in point (b) are adopted and through which instrument they are applied remains within the competences of the Member States;’.
predlagati nacionalne zahteve za jedrsko varnost, jih opredeliti ali sodelovati pri njihovem opredeljevanju;
In Article 5, paragraphs 2 and 3 are replaced by the following:
zahtevati od imetnika dovoljenja, da izpolnjuje nacionalne zahteve za jedrsko varnost in dokaže njihovo izpolnjevanje ter da izpolnjuje pogoje iz ustreznega dovoljenja;
Member States shall ensure the effective independence from undue influence of the competent regulatory authority in its regulatory decision-making.
preveriti tako izpolnjevanje z regulativnimi ocenami in inšpekcijami;
For this purpose, Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires that the competent regulatory authority:
predlagati ali izvesti učinkovite in sorazmerne izvršilne ukrepe.“;
is functionally separate from any other body or organisation concerned with the promotion or utilisation of nuclear energy, and does not seek or take instructions from any such body or organisation when carrying out its regulatory tasks;
Členi 6, 7 in 8 se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
takes regulatory decisions founded on robust and transparent nuclear safety-related requirements;
„Člen 6
is given dedicated and appropriate budget allocations to allow for the delivery of its regulatory tasks as defined in the national framework and is responsible for the implementation of the allocated budget;
Imetniki dovoljenj
employs an appropriate number of staff with qualifications, experience and expertise necessary to fulfil its obligations.
Države članice zagotovijo, da nacionalni okvir določa, da:
It may use external scientific and technical resources and expertise in support of its regulatory functions;
za jedrsko varnost jedrskega objekta je odgovoren predvsem imetnik dovoljenja.
establishes procedures for the prevention and resolution of any conflicts of interest;
Te odgovornosti ni mogoče prenesti, vključuje pa odgovornost za dejavnosti izvajalcev in podizvajalcev, katerih dejavnosti bi lahko vplivale na jedrsko varnost jedrskih objektov;
provides nuclear safety-related information without clearance from any other body or organisation, provided that this does not jeopardise other overriding interests, such as security, recognised in relevant legislation or international instruments.
pri oddaji vloge za izdajo dovoljenja mora vložnik predložiti dokaz o jedrski varnosti.
Member States shall ensure that the competent regulatory authority is given the legal powers necessary to fulfil its obligations in connection with the national framework described in Article 4(1).
Njegov obseg in raven podrobnosti sta sorazmerna s potencialnim obsegom in vrsto nevarnosti, ki se nanaša na jedrski objekt in njegovo lokacijo;
For this purpose, Member States shall ensure that the national framework entrusts the competent regulatory authorities with the following main regulatory tasks, to:
imetniki dovoljenj vzpostavijo in izvajajo sisteme upravljanja, katerih glavni poudarek je na jedrski varnosti;
propose, define or participate in the definition of national nuclear safety requirements;
imetniki dovoljenj določijo ustrezne postopke in ureditve za odzivanje na izredne dogodke na lokaciji objekta ter smernice za obvladovanje hudih nesreč ali enakovredne ureditve, ki omogočajo učinkovito odzivanje na nesreče, da se preprečijo ali ublažijo njihove posledice.
require that the licence holder complies and demonstrates compliance with national nuclear safety requirements and the terms of the relevant licence;
Ti postopki so zlasti:
verify such compliance through regulatory assessments and inspections;
skladni z drugimi operativnimi postopki in se redno izvajajo, da se preveri njihova izvedljivost;
propose or carry out effective and proportionate enforcement actions.’.
usmerjeni v obvladovanje nesreč in resnih nesreč, ki bi se lahko zgodile med katerim koli načinom obratovanja, in nesreče, ki lahko hkrati prizadenejo več enot;
Articles 6, 7 and 8 are replaced by the following:
določajo ureditve za prejemanje zunanje pomoči;
‘Article 6
se redno pregledujejo in posodabljajo, pri čemer se upoštevajo izkušnje, pridobljene med vajami in ob nesrečah;
Licence holders
imetniki dovoljenj zagotovijo in vzdržujejo finančne in človeške vire z ustreznimi usposobljenostjo in pristojnostmi, potrebnimi za izpolnitev njihovih obveznosti v zvezi z jedrsko varnostjo jedrskega objekta.
Member States shall ensure that the national framework requires that:
Imetniki dovoljenja poleg tega zagotovijo, da imajo izvajalci in podizvajalci, za katere so odgovorni in katerih dejavnosti bi lahko vplivale na jedrsko varnost jedrskega objekta, na voljo potrebne človeške vire z ustreznimi usposobljenostjo in pristojnostmi, potrebnimi za izpolnitev njihovih obveznosti.
the prime responsibility for the nuclear safety of a nuclear installation rests with the licence holder.
Člen 7