natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission investigated this programme and, on the basis of the information received from sampled exporting producers and the GOC, concluded that there was no benefit from this programme during the IP, principally because import prices of polysilicon were lower than prices charged by Chinese suppliers.
Komisija je proučila ta program in je na podlagi informacij, ki jih je prejela od vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in kitajske vlade, sklenila, da ta program v OP ni prinašal ugodnosti, predvsem zato, ker so bile uvozne cene polisilicija nižje od cen kitajskih dobaviteljev.
It is noted that the investigation period for the US case and for the case at hand were different.
Opozoriti je treba, da se je obdobje preiskave v zadevi v ZDA razlikovalo od obdobja te preiskave.
The complainant also claimed that the Commission should have established a subsidy margin with regards to provision of electricity for less than adequate remuneration.
Pritožnik je trdil tudi, da bi morala Komisija določiti stopnjo subvencije v zvezi z zagotavljanjem električne energije za manj kot ustrezno nadomestilo.
The Commission did not find sufficient evidence that the sampled exporting producers, with the exception of LDK, benefited from preferential provision of electricity in the IP.
Komisija ni našla zadostnih dokazov, da so bili vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki, z izjemo skupine LDK, v OP upravičeni do ugodnejšega zagotavljanja električne energije.
The GOC claimed that the Commission's calculation methodology resulted in the ‘double counting at the level of the ant-dumping and anti-subsidy margin calculations’.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da je zaradi metodologije izračuna, ki jo je uporabila Komisija, prišlo do „dvojnega štetja na ravni izračuna protidampinške in protisubvencijske stopnje“.
According to the GOC the Commission should have deducted the subsidy margin calculated for the export credit insurance programme from the dumping margins on the basis that it is an export subsidy.
Po navedbah kitajske vlade bi morala Komisija od stopenj dampinga odšteti stopnjo subvencije, izračunano za program zavarovanja izvoznih kreditov, na podlagi dejstva, da gre za izvozno subvencijo.
The GOC also claimed that the Commission should have deducted from the dumping margin the subsidy margins calculated on the basis of out-of-country benchmarks.
Kitajska vlada je trdila tudi, da bi morala Komisija od stopnje dampinga odšteti stopnje subvencije, izračunane na podlagi zunanjih referenčnih vrednosti.
It reasoned that ‘part of dumping calculated based on an analogue country normal value is actually same subsidisation that has been countervailed in the parallel anti-subsidy investigation’.
Pojasnila je, da „del dampinga, izračunan na podlagi normalne vrednosti primerljive države, v bistvu pomeni isto subvencioniranje, za katerega so se sprejeli izravnalni ukrepi v vzporedni protisubvencijski preiskavi“.
Neither of these claims would have any impact on the level of the resulting measures as in the present case the combined duties are limited by the injury margin.
Nobena od teh trditev ne bi vplivala na raven ukrepov, saj so skupne dajatve v tem primeru omejene s stopnjo škode.
The GOC also confirmed this in the comments to definitive disclosure document.
Kitajska vlada je to tudi potrdila v pripombah glede dokumenta o dokončnem razkritju.
Therefore it was not considered necessary to address the substance of these claims.
Zato se ni zdelo potrebno obravnavati vsebine teh trditev.
Amount of countervailable subsidies
Zneski subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi
The amounts of countervailable subsidies in accordance with the provisions of the basic Regulation, expressed ad valorem, for the investigated companies are set out in the table below:
Zneski subvencij za preiskane družbe, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, določeni v skladu z določbami osnovne uredbe in izraženi ad valorem, so navedeni v spodnji preglednici:
Definitive subsidy margin
Dokončna stopnja subvencije
Wuxi Suntech Power Co. Ltd;
Wuxi Suntech Power Co. Ltd.,
Changzhou Youze Technology Co. Ltd;
Changzhou Youze Technology Co. Ltd.,
Other co-operating companies (Annex 1)
Druge sodelujoče družbe (Priloga 1)
In accordance with Article 15(3) of the basic Regulation, the total subsidy margin for the cooperating companies not included in the sample is calculated on the basis of the total weighted average subsidy margin established for the cooperating companies in the sample, i.e. 6,4 %.
V skladu s členom 15(3) osnovne uredbe je skupna stopnja subvencije za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso zajete v vzorcu, 6,4 % in je izračunana na podlagi skupnega tehtanega povprečja stopnje subvencije, določene za sodelujoče družbe v vzorcu.
Given the high level of cooperation of Chinese exporting producers, the ‘all other companies’ duty was set at the level of the highest duty to be imposed on the companies, respectively, sampled or cooperating in the investigation.
Ob upoštevanju visoke stopnje sodelovanja kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je bila dajatev, ki velja za „vse druge družbe“, določena na ravni najvišje dajatve, ki bo uvedena za družbe, ki so vzorčene ali sodelujejo v preiskavi.
They constitute the Union industry within the meaning of Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation and will hereafter be referred to as ‘the Union industry’.
Ti sestavljajo industrijo Unije v smislu člena 9(1) osnovne uredbe, v nadaljnjem besedilu pa bodo imenovani „industrija Unije“.
The Institutions have verified claims by interested parties that there was a higher number; this verification has revealed that the alleged additional producers were in reality mostly exporting producers, importers related to those, distributors and installers.
Institucije so preverile trditve zainteresiranih strani, da je število večje; pri preverjanju se je razkrilo, da so bili domnevni dodatni proizvajalci v resnici večinoma proizvajalci izvozniki, z njimi povezani uvozniki, distributerji in monterji.
All available information concerning the Union industry, including information provided in the complaint, macroeconomic data provided by Europressedienst, an independent consultancy firm (‘the consultant’) and the verified questionnaire responses of the sampled Union producers were used to establish the total Union production in the IP since complete public information on production was not available.
Za določitev celotne proizvodnje Unije v OP so bile uporabljene vse razpoložljive informacije o industriji Unije, vključno z informacijami iz pritožbe, makroekonomskimi podatki, ki jih je zagotovilo neodvisno svetovalno podjetje Europressedienst („svetovalec“), in preverjenimi vprašalniki, ki so jih izpolnili vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije, saj popolne javne informacije o proizvodnji niso bile na razpolago.
As modules and cells are imported into the Union under customs headings covering other products not subject to the present investigation and the reported import volumes are in tonnes, Eurostat could not be used to determine import volumes and values, which were based on the data provided by the consultant.
Ker se moduli in celice v Unijo uvažajo pod carinskimi oznakami, ki zajemajo druge izdelke, ki niso zajeti v tej preiskavi, in ker so sporočeni podatki o obsegu uvoza izraženi v tonah, podatkov Eurostata ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za določitev obsega in vrednosti uvoza, ki sta temeljila na podatkih, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec.
When possible, the data received from the consultant were cross-checked with other available public sources and with the verified questionnaire replies.
Kjer je bilo mogoče, so bili podatki, ki jih je poslal svetovalec, navzkrižno preverjeni z drugimi razpoložljivimi javnimi viri in preverjenimi izpolnjenimi vprašalniki.
On this basis, the total Union production was estimated to be around 4 GW for modules and 2 GW for cells during the IP.
Na podlagi tega je bila celotna proizvodnja Unije v OP ocenjena na približno 4 GW za module in 2 GW za celice.
As indicated in recital (21) above, nine Union producers were selected in the sample representing 18 % — 21 % of the total Union production of modules and 17 % — 24 % of the total Union production of cells.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (21), je bilo v vzorec vključenih devet izbranih proizvajalcev Unije, ki predstavljajo med 18 % in 21 % celotne proizvodnje modulov v Uniji in 17 %–24 % celotne proizvodnje celic v Uniji.
Several parties contested the fact that data provided by the consultant were used to determine, inter alia, Union production, Union production capacity as well as other macroeconomic injury indicators concerning the Union industry and import data.
Več strani je izpodbijalo dejstvo, da so bili podatki, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec, med drugim uporabljeni za določitev proizvodnje Unije, proizvodne zmogljivosti Unije ter drugih makroekonomskih kazalnikov škode v zvezi z industrijo Unije in podatkov o uvozu.
As regards the alleged links between the consultant and the complainant, the relevant interested parties did not submit any evidence showing that such links existed.
Glede domnevne povezave med svetovalcem in pritožnikom zadevne zainteresirane strani niso predložile dokazov, da takšna povezava obstaja.
The Commission considered it appropriate to make use of this consultancy in the current investigation, due to the unavailability from other publicly available sources of the necessary macroeconomic data covering the total Union market as well as import data.
Komisija je menila, da je v sedanji preiskavi primerno uporabiti to svetovalno podjetje zaradi nerazpoložljivosti potrebnih makroekonomskih podatkov, ki se nanašajo na celoten trg Unije, in uvoznih podatkov iz drugih javnih virov.
In this respect, it is noted that several research companies specialised in collecting PV statistics exist on the market and the figures reported are almost never identical.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da na trgu obstaja več raziskovalnih podjetij, specializiranih za zbiranje statističnih podatkov o fotonapetostnem sektorju, in da številke, ki jih sporočajo, skoraj nikoli niso enake.
In this context, the cross-checking exercise carried out by the Commission consisted of comparing the trends of the data received from the consultant with the trends of the same data published by other research companies, the Commission's Joint Research Center (‘JRC’) and the EPIA on the same topics, when available.
V zvezi s tem je navzkrižno preverjanje, ki ga je izvedla Komisija, vključevalo primerjavo trendov podatkov, prejetih od svetovalca, s trendi razpoložljivih enakih podatkov, ki so jih o istih temah objavila druga raziskovalna podjetja, Skupni raziskovalni center Komisije in združenje EPIA.
No significant differences were noticed as a result of the cross-checking exercise and the trends of the indicators for which the cross-checking was done were similar.
Navzkrižno preverjanje ni razkrilo nobenih pomembnih razlik, trendi kazalnikov, vključenih v navzkrižno preverjanje, pa so bili podobni.
Provisional anti-dumping findings were therefore not solely based on data provided by the consultant but also on the Commission's own analysis and assessment of these data.
Torej začasne ugotovitve o dampingu niso temeljile le na podatkih, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec, ampak tudi na analizi Komisije in njeni presoji teh podatkov.
In addition, as mentioned above in recital (8), after the imposition of provisional anti-dumping measures a verification visit took place at the premises of the consultant.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (8), je Komisija po uvedbi začasnih protidampinških ukrepov opravila tudi preveritveni obisk v prostorih svetovalca.
As far as the other sources used to cross check the data provided by the consultant are concerned, these were reports published by the JRC and by ‘EPIA’ on the same topics.
Kar zadeva druge vire, uporabljene za navzkrižno preverjanje podatkov, ki jih je zagotovil svetovalec, so to bila poročila, ki sta jih o istih temah objavila Skupni raziskovalni center Komisije in združenje EPIA.
The consultant's main activity is collecting data linked to the PV sector and developing an up-to-date database of companies active in the PV market.
Glavna dejavnost svetovalca je zbiranje podatkov, povezanih s fotonapetostnim sektorjem, in razvoj posodobljene baze podatkov družb, ki delujejo na fotonapetostnemu trgu.
It was verified that these sources were used by the consultant in its daily activity.
Potrjeno je bilo, da svetovalec te vire uporablja v okviru vsakodnevnih dejavnosti.
With regard to the Best Practices for the submission of economic evidence issued by the competent service of the Commission (‘the Best Practices’), the following remarks should be made.
V zvezi z dokumentom o dobrih praksah za predložitev gospodarskih dokazov, ki ga je izdala pristojna služba Komisije, je treba pripomniti naslednje.
Secondly, the Best Practices concern the submission of economic analysis and data used in competition investigations pursuant to Article 101 and 102 TFEU and in merger cases.
Drugič, dokument o dobrih praksah se nanaša na predložitev gospodarske analize in podatkov, ki se uporabljajo v preiskavah v zvezi s konkurenco v skladu s členoma 101 in 102 PDEU, in v primerih združitev.
Several parties contested the methodology used by the consultant claiming that it would not reach recognised scientific standards.
Več strani je nasprotovalo metodologiji, ki jo je uporabil svetovalec, in trdilo, da ne dosega priznanih znanstvenih standardov.
However, as mentioned above in recital (481) above, the methodology was assessed and the resulting data were cross-checked and verified and as a result were considered in line with other published data and therefore reasonably reliable.
Vendar pa je bila metodologija ocenjena, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (481), pridobljeni podatki pa so bili navzkrižno preverjeni, zaradi česar so se šteli za skladne z drugimi objavljenimi podatki in zato za upravičeno zanesljive.
Specific points raised by certain interested parties, were clarified bilaterally and made available in the open file of the investigation for inspection by interested parties.
Posebna vprašanja, ki so jih izpostavile določene zainteresirane strani, so bila dvostransko pojasnjena in dana na voljo v dokumentaciji preiskave, odprti za pregled zainteresiranih strani.
The CCCME argued that the methodology of data aggregation was not clarified.
CCCME je trdila, da metodologija združevanja podatkov ni bila pojasnjena.
This claim was rejected as the relevant information was made available to all interested parties in the file open for inspection by interested parties.
Ta trditev je bila zavrnjena, saj so bile ustrezne informacije dane na voljo vsem zainteresiranim stranem v dokumentaciji preiskave, odprti za pregled zainteresiranih strani.
In addition, CCCME contested that the data collected by the consultant can be considered as positive evidence within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation since the data was to a large extent based on assumptions and estimations.
Poleg tega je CCCME nasprotovala trditvi, da se lahko podatki, ki jih je zbral svetovalec, štejejo za trdne dokaze v smislu člena 3(2) osnovne uredbe, ker so podatki v veliki meri temeljili na predpostavkah in ocenah.
Furthermore, it was claimed that the data supplied were not sufficiently supported by evidence in the file and that they were not of an affirmative, objective and verifiable character.
Poleg tega so trdile, da zagotovljeni podatki niso bili zadostno podprti z dokazi iz spisa ter da niso imeli pritrdilnega, objektivnega in preverljivega značaja.
In respect of these claims, reference is made to the recitals (481) — (482) above where additional information was provided regarding the selection of the consultant.
V zvezi s temi trditvami je treba omeniti uvodni izjavi (481) in (482), v katerih so navedene dodatne informacije o izbiri svetovalca.
Furthermore, it is recalled that the consultant's capacity to provide all the needed data in due time was of great importance since the Commission was bound to statutory deadlines for the publication of the provisional findings in the on-going investigation.
Treba je tudi dodati, da je bila zmožnost svetovalca, da pravočasno zagotovi vse potrebne podatke, zelo pomembna, ker je bila Komisija zavezana spoštovanju zakonsko predpisanih rokov za objavo začasnih ugotovitev v potekajoči preiskavi.
As regards the quality of the data supplied and whether it can be considered as positive evidence in accordance with Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation, as mentioned above in recital (482), the consultant's methodology for collecting the data was examined and it was assessed that it was of satisfactory quality.
Kar zadeva kakovost zagotovljenih podatkov in vprašanja, ali se lahko štejejo za trdne dokaze v skladu s členom 3(2) osnovne uredbe, kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (482), je bila kakovost svetovalčeve metodologije za zbiranje podatkov proučena in ocenjena kot zadovoljiva.
In respect of these claims, it is noted that subsequently to the imposition of the provisional measures, the Commission provided interested parties with the methodology and with the sources used by the consultant in aggregating the data and addressed specific questions of the interested parties in this regard following the provisional anti-dumping disclosure.
V zvezi s temi trditvami je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov zainteresirane strani seznanila z metodologijo in viri, ki jih je svetovalec uporabil pri združevanju podatkov, ter obravnavala posebna vprašanja zainteresiranih strani v zvezi s tem, ki so se pojavila po začasnem protidampinškem razkritju.
In this respect, it is clarified that the Union producers considered by the consultant are largely the same than the ones known to represent the Union industry in this investigation mentioned in recital (475) above.
V zvezi s tem je treba pojasniti, da so proizvajalci Unije, ki jih je upošteval svetovalec, večinoma isti kot tisti, ki predstavljajo industrijo Unije v tej preiskavi, kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (475).
After final disclosure, one party claimed that the Commission has conducted the injury analysis in an inconsistent manner since it was done separately for modules and cells while the injury and subsidy margin calculations had been established as a weighted average for modules and cells together.
Po dokončnem razkritju je ena stran trdila, da je Komisija izvedla analizo škode na neskladen način, ker je bila opravljena ločeno za module in celice, medtem ko so bili izračuni škode in stopnje subvencije izvedeni kot tehtano povprečje za module in celice skupaj.
It is also recalled that modules and cells are one single product and therefore the subsidy margins and the injury elimination level were established on this basis.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da so moduli in celice en sam izdelek, zato so bile stopnje subvencije in stopnja odprave škode določene na tej podlagi.
It is clarified that a simple average of the data was only used in case where there were similar trends in the periods concerned.
Pojasnjeno je, da je bilo preprosto povprečje podatkov uporabljeno samo, ko so v zadevnih obdobjih obstajali podobni trendi.
Part of the Union industry is vertically integrated and a substantial part of the Union industry's production was destined for captive use, in particular for the production of cells.
Del industrije Unije je vertikalno integriran, velik del proizvodnje industrije Unije pa je namenjen lastni uporabi, zlasti proizvodnja celic.
In order to establish whether or not the Union industry suffered material injury and to determine consumption and other economic indicators, it was examined whether and to what extent the subsequent use of the Union industry's production of the like product (‘captive’ use) had to be taken into account.
Za ugotovitev, ali je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo, ter določitev potrošnje in drugih gospodarskih kazalnikov je bilo proučeno, ali in v kakšni meri je treba upoštevati nadaljnjo uporabo podobnega izdelka v proizvodnji industrije Unije („lastna“ uporaba).
It was found that the following economic indicators related to the Union industry should be examined by referring to the total activity (including the captive use of the industry): consumption, sales volume, production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, growth, investments, stocks, employment, productivity, cash flow, return on investment, ability to raise capital and magnitude of the amount of the countervailable subsidies.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da bi bilo treba naslednje gospodarske kazalnike, povezane z industrijo Unije, proučiti glede na celotno dejavnost (vključno z lastno uporabo industrije Unije): potrošnjo, obseg prodaje, proizvodnjo, proizvodno zmogljivost, izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, rast, naložbe, zaloge, zaposlenost, produktivnost, denarni tok, donosnost naložb, zmožnost zbiranja kapitala in višino subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi.
As regards profitability, the analysis focused on the free market since prices in the captive market were found not to always reflect market prices and did not have an impact on this indicator.
Analiza je bila glede dobičkonosnosti osredotočena na prosti trg, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da cene na zaprtem trgu ne izražajo vedno tržnih cen in ne vplivajo na ta kazalnik.
Several parties argued that the injury should have been assessed separately for the captive and for the free market.
Več strani je trdilo, da bi bilo treba škodo oceniti ločeno za zaprti trg in prosti trg.
One party argued that data relating to cells destined for captive use should have been excluded from the injury assessment on the grounds that they were not affected by the subsidised imports.
Ena stran je trdila, da bi bilo treba podatke, ki se nanašajo na celice, namenjene lastni uporabi, izključiti iz ocene škode, ker subvencionirani uvoz nanje ne vpliva.
The investigation has shown that vertically integrated Union producers were forced to import subsidised products (cells) and to cease production of these products at cost above the import price, as a consequence of the price pressure exerted by the subsidised imports.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so bili vertikalno integrirani proizvajalci Unije prisiljeni uvažati subvencionirane izdelke (celice) in ustaviti proizvodnjo teh izdelkov, katere stroški so bili višji od uvozne cene, zaradi pritiska na cene, ki se je izvajal s subvencioniranim uvozom.
Furthermore, the investigation also revealed that the free market and the captive market displayed the same trends in prices, which also showed that they were equally affected by the imports concerned.
Poleg tega je preiskava pokazala, da je trend cen na prostem trgu enak tistemu na zaprtem trgu, kar kaže tudi, da zadevni uvoz enako vpliva na cene na obeh trgih.
After final disclosure, several parties reiterated that the Commission failed to provide an adequate and reasoned analysis of the captive market or why a separate analysis had not been carried out.
Po dokončnem razkritju je več strani ponovilo, da Komisija ni uspela zagotoviti ustrezne in utemeljene analize zaprtega trga, ali zakaj ni bila opravljena ločena analiza.
In addition, it was claimed that recital (106) to the provisional anti-dumping Regulation concluding that prices in the captive market did not always reflect market prices, contradicted the conclusions set out in recital (503) above that the free market and captive market displayed similar trends in prices.
Poleg tega je trdila, da je uvodna izjava (106) začasne protidampinške uredbe, ki navaja, da cene na zaprtem trgu ne izražajo vedno tržnih cen, v nasprotju s sklepi iz uvodne izjave (503), da je trend cen na prostem trgu podoben tistemu na zaprtem trgu.
It is firstly noted that recital (105) to the provisional anti-dumping Regulation sets out the reasons as to why it was considered appropriate to examine injury indicators (except for profitability) referring to the total activity of the Union industry including captive use.
Najprej je treba omeniti, da so v uvodni izjavi (105) začasne protidampinške uredbe določeni razlogi, zakaj se je štelo primerno, da se proučijo kazalniki škode (razen dobičkonosnosti) glede na celotno dejavnost industrije Unije, vključno z lastno uporabo.