natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This conclusion refers to the situation and period of time covered by the complaint, and is without prejudice to the possibility of the Commission examining measures taken by Spain since 2005,
Glej točki (b) in (c) Priloge I k Direktivi 2003/54/ES.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Pripombe družbe Iberdrola z dne 26. aprila 2007.
Article 1
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. marca 1993 v združenih zadevah C-72/91 in C-73/91, točka 21:
The recognition by the Kingdom of Spain of the costs incurred by distributors in supplying electricity to medium-sized and large business end-users at regulated tariffs during 2005 in the form of the collection rights of Iberdrola, SA, Unión Eléctrica Fenosa, SA, Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, SA, Endesa, SA and Elcogás, SA established in Royal Decree-Law 5/2005 does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
„Obravnavani sistem si prek svojega predmeta in splošne strukture ne prizadeva ustvariti prednosti, ki bi pomenila dodatno breme za državo.“
Article 2
Sodba Sodišča z dne 7. februarja 1985 v zadevi Procureur de la République proti Association de défense des brûleurs d'huiles usagées (ADBHU) (240/83, Recueil, str. 531, predvsem str. 543 in 544 in točka 18).
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Spain.
Sklep Komisije z dne 12. junija 2012 o državni pomoči SA.21918 (C 17/07) (ex NN 17/07), ki jo je Francija odobrila v zvezi z reguliranimi tarifami električne energije v Franciji, UL C 398, 22.12.2012, str. 10, zlasti odstavki od 30 do 37 in od 134 do 137.
Done at Brussels, 4 February 2014.
Komisija je z dopisoma z dne 15. maja in 6. julija 2007 pripombe zainteresiranih strani sporočila španskim organom, ki jim je bila dana možnost, da se odzovejo;
For the Commission
njihove pripombe so bile prejete v dopisu z dne 2. avgusta 2007.
OJ C 43, 27.2.2007, p. 9.
Ni se zgodilo prvič, da je obračunski postopek razkril primanjkljaj, vendar je bil znesek primanjkljaja iz leta 2005 brez primere.
See footnote 1.
Obratno pa je veljalo za obdobje med oktobrom 2006 in decembrom 2007:
The System Operator (Red Eléctrica de España) is responsible for guaranteeing the security of electricity supply and the coordination of the production and transport system.
Poleg tega je neposredna podpora za energijske stroške električne energije iz posebne sheme (obnovljivi viri energije, soproizvodnja), ki ni bila prodana organiziranemu trgu in ki je bila na računih evidentirana kot regulirani strošek, leta 2005 znašala 2701 milijonov EUR, kar je 5,75 % več kot leta 2004.
The so-called ‘special scheme’ generators.
Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico S.A.:
distributors (and the transmission system operator) are obliged to purchase the entire output of eligible cogeneration and renewable-based installations located in their area of responsibility at a cost-covering rate set by the State.
Veljavna obrestna mera je bila trimesečni Euribor.
Royal Decree 2392/2004, of 30 December, establishing the electricity tariff for 2005; Official State Gazette 315, p. 42766, Annex I.
le 8,5 % odjemalcev je kupovalo energijo na prostem trgu, medtem ko se jih je 91,5 % še naprej odločilo za regulirane tarife (manj kot 97 % leta 2004).
Article 12(2) of the LSE provided that electricity tariffs were, in principle, set once a year but could be adjusted during the year.
Odjemalci visokonapetostne energije (predvsem industrijski odjemalci) so bili glavna kategorija na prostem trgu;
Under Article 8 of Royal Decree 1432/2002, the average tariff could not increase by more than 1,40 % (year on year), whereas individual tariffs could increase only by a percentage calculated as the increase in the average tariff + 0,60 % (2 % in total).
38,9 % jih je izkoristilo možnost izbire in njihovi nakupi so znašali 29 % skupnega odjema električne energije v celinski Španiji leta 2005.
Royal Decree-Law 5/2005 of 11 March 2005 on urgent reforms to promote productivity and improve public procurement.
Kot kaže spodnja preglednica 2, se je število odjemalcev na prostem trgu povečevalo skozi vse leto 2005, nato pa je leta 2006 upadlo, tako da se je njihov delež (8,15 %) izenačil z deležem v prvi polovici leta 2005.
Official State Gazette 62, 14.3.2005, p. 8832.
Podobno se je upad dobave električne energije končnim uporabnikom na prostem trgu, ki je bil decembra 2004 očiten, nadaljeval v prvi polovici leta 2005.
Stranded costs are losses sustained by incumbent electricity providers as a result of non-recoverable investments carried out before liberalisation.
Čeprav se je med junijem in septembrom 2005 znatno ustavil, se je nato nadaljeval decembra 2005 in skozi vse leto 2006.
The Commission authorised the granting of compensatory aid to cover such losses, on the basis of the criteria outlined in the Stranded Costs Methodology (Commission Communication relating to the methodology for analysing State aid linked to stranded costs), by letter SG (2001) D/290869 of 6 August 2001.
Distributerji opozarjajo, da je bil pravni okvir, v katerem so dobavitelji in distributerji izvajali svoje dejavnosti, precej drugačen;
By Decision SG (2001) D/290553 of 25 July 2001 in Case NN 49/99, the Commission authorised Spain to grant compensation for stranded costs until 2008 to the same companies which were asked to prefinance the 2005 deficit.
distributerji so morali električno energijo za dobavo kupovati po reguliranih tarifah na posebne načine (na organiziranem trgu ali od proizvajalcev v „posebnih shemah“), medtem ko so se lahko dobavitelji prosto pogajali o svojih cenah.
Annual Report 2005, Elcogás SA, available at http://www.elcogas.es/images/stories/3-principales-indicadores/1-datos-economico-financieros/esp2005.pdf
Dejansko iz podatkov iz uvodne izjave 28 izhaja, da so stroški prenosa in distribucije v elektroenergetskem sistemu leta 2005 znašali 4410 milijonov EUR, kar je v skladu z enakima stroškovnima postavkama za leti 2004 in 2006.
First additional provision of Royal Decree 809/2006 of 30 June 2006 revising the electricity tariff from 1 July 2006.
Tako raven stroškov distributerjev ni povezana z zneskom primanjkljaja leta 2005.
Official State Gazette 156, 1.7.2006.
Ugotovljena ni bila nobena neposredna in prepoznavna vzročna povezava med tarifami in morebitnim umetnim povišanjem veleprodajnih cen;
Spain liberalised the retail electricity market earlier than required by the 1996 and 2003 Electricity Directives, which provided for a liberalisation timetable between 1999 and 2004 for business end-users (starting with the largest) and made the liberalisation of the household segment mandatory only from 1 July 2007.
to ostaja nedokazana teoretična hipoteza.
OJ L 176, 15.7.2003, p. 37.
Kraljevi odlok 2392/2004 z dne 30. decembra 2004 o določitvi tarife električne energije za leto 2005;
Article 3(3) of the 2003 Electricity Directive states:
Uradni list Španije št. 315, str. 42766, Priloga I.
‘Member States shall ensure that all household customers, and, where Member States deem it appropriate, small enterprises (namely enterprises with fewer than 50 occupied persons and an annual turnover or balance sheet not exceeding EUR 10 million), enjoy universal service, that is the right to be supplied with electricity of a specified quality within their territory at reasonable, easily and clearly comparable and transparent prices.
Kraljevi odlok z zakonsko močjo 5/2005 z dne 11. marca 2005 o nujnih reformah za pospeševanje produktivnosti in izboljšanje javnega naročanja.
To ensure the provision of universal service, Member States may appoint a supplier of last resort.’
Uradni list Španije št. 62, 14.3.2005, str. 8832.
Suppliers also bought power in the wholesale market (‘the pool’) and even though, theoretically, they could have entered into bilateral agreements with generators, in reality there was no incentive for generators (mainly vertically integrated groups) to do so.
Komisija je z dopisom SG (2001) D/290869 z dne 6. avgusta 2001 odobrila dodelitev kompenzacijske pomoči za pokritje takih izgub, in sicer na podlagi meril, določenih v metodologiji za nasedle stroške (sporočilo Komisije o metodologiji za analiziranje državne pomoči, povezane z nasedlimi stroški).
See Annex I, letters (b) and (c) to Directive 2003/54/EC.
Komisija je s Sklepom SG (2001) D/290553 z dne 25. julija 2001 v zadevi NN 49/99 Španiji odobrila dodelitev kompenzacije za nasedle stroške do leta 2008 za iste družbe, ki so bile pozvane k predfinanciranju primanjkljaja iz leta 2005.
observations by Iberdrola dated 26 April 2007.
Prva dodatna določba kraljevega odloka 809/2006 z dne 30. junija 2006 o revidiranju tarife električne energije od 1. junija 2006.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-72/91 and C-73/91, paragraph 21:
Uradni list Španije št. 156, 1.7.2006.
‘The system at issue does not seek, through its object and general structure, to create an advantage which would constitute an additional burden for the State’.
Velika večina gospodinjstev in majhnih odjemalcev nizkonapetostne energije, ki bi se lahko od leta 2003 odločili za prosti trg [14], je še vedno uporabljala regulirane tarife, vendar se jih je leta 2005 znaten delež prav tako odločil za prosti trg.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-240/83 Procureur de la République v Association de défense des brûleurs d'huiles usagées (ADBHU) [1985] ECR 531, especially pp. 543-544 and paragraph 18.
je selektiven ter (d) vpliva na trgovino v Skupnosti in lahko izkrivlja konkurenco znotraj Unije.
(notified under document C(2014) 4479)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 4479)
(only the Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v angleškem, češkem, danskem, finskem, francoskem, italijanskem, latvijskem, madžarskem, nizozemskem, nemškem, poljskem, portugalskem, slovenskem, španskem in švedskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Under Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, only agricultural expenditure which has been incurred in a way that has not infringed European Union rules may be financed.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1258/1999 in Uredbo (ES) št. 1290/2005 se lahko financirajo samo kmetijski odhodki, ki so nastali skladno s predpisi Evropske unije.
This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 15 March 2014 and relating to its content,
Ta sklep ne vpliva na morebitne finančne ugotovitve, do katerih bi Komisija lahko prišla na podlagi sodb Sodišča v zadevah, ki so 15. marca 2014 še nerešene in so povezane z vsebino tega sklepa –
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Latvia, Hungary, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na Kraljevino Belgijo, Češko republiko, Kraljevino Dansko, Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Kraljevino Španijo, Francosko republiko, Italijansko republiko, Republiko Latvijo, Madžarsko, Republiko Poljsko, Portugalsko republiko, Republiko Slovenijo, Republiko Finsko, Kraljevino Švedsko ter Združeno kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska.
OJ L 160, 26 6 1999, p. 103.
UL L 160, 26.6.1999, str. 103.
OJ L 209, 11 8 2005, p. 1.
UL L 209, 11.8.2005, str. 1.
Payments for ineligible animals and incorrect application of sanctions
Plačila za neupravičene živali in nepravilna uporaba sankcij
ONE– OFF
Enkratni popravek
TOTAL BE
BE SKUPAJ
Other Direct Aid — Article 68– 72 of Reg 73/2009
Druge neposredne pomoči – členi 68–72 Uredbe št. 73/2009
Undue payments and non– application of reductions/exclusions for animals with irregularities
Neupravičena plačila in oprostitev znižanj/izključitev za živali z nepravilnostmi
TOTAL CZ
CZ SKUPAJ
lack of extrapolation in case of overdeclaration below 3 %
Neekstrapolacija v primeru čezmerne prijave pod 3 %
deficiencies in the measurement tolerance
Pomanjkljivosti pri dovoljenem odstopanju pri meritvah
TOTAL DE
DE SKUPAJ
On– the– spot check weaknesses
Slabosti v pregledih na kraju samem
FLAT RATE
Pavšalni popravek
Retroactive recoveries and incorrect treatment of payment entitlements
Retroaktivne izterjave in nepravilna obravnava plačilnih pravic
TOTAL DK
DK SKUPAJ
Not conclusive administrative controls, deficiencies in on– the– spot controls and external audit
Administrativne kontrole brez dokončnih rezultatov, pomanjkljivosti pri pregledih na kraju samem in pri zunanji reviziji
Weaknesses in the administrative controls, on– the– spot checks and recoveries
Slabosti v administrativnih kontrolah, pregledih na kraju samem in izterjavah
Leniency of the sanctioning system, CY2008
Popustljiv sistem sankcij, leto zahtevka 2008
Partial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2008
Delni in neučinkoviti pregledi številnih PZR, leto zahtevka 2008
Partial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2010
Delni in neučinkoviti pregledi številnih PZR, leto zahtevka 2010
Partial and ineffective check of many SMRs, CY2009
Delni in neučinkoviti pregledi številnih PZR, leto zahtevka 2009
TOTAL ES
ES SKUPAJ
Weaknesses in LPIS, on– the– spot checks and calculation of reductions
Slabosti v LPIS, pregledih na kraju samem in izračunu znižanj
TOTAL FI
FI SKUPAJ
Milk — Schoolmilk
Mleko – mleko za šole
late on– the– spot control for School milk scheme (school year 2008– 2009)
Prepozni pregledi na kraju samem za program razdeljevanja mleka v šolah (šolsko leto 2008–2009)
irregular allocations of the national reserve and consolidation of the forage areas
Nepravilne dodelitve nacionalne rezerve in združevanje podatkov o krmnih površinah
TOTAL FR
FR SKUPAJ
Weaknesses in LPIS and on– the– spot checks
Slabosti v LPIS in pregledih na kraju samem
TOTAL GB
GB SKUPAJ
Fruit and Vegetables — Tomato Processing
Sadje in zelenjava – predelava paradižnika
Weaknesses in administrative and accounting checks;
Slabosti v administrativnih in računovodskih pregledih;
No reconciling records held by producer organisations and processors with the accounts required under national law
brez usklajevanja evidenc organizacij proizvajalcev in predelovalcev z računovodskimi izkazi, predpisanimi z nacionalno zakonodajo
Irregularities
Pomanjkanje informacij o sprejetih ukrepih za izterjavo
Lack of information on the undertaken recovery actions
Malomarnost v postopku izterjave
Negligence in the recovery procedure
Neporočanje v skladu s Prilogo III
Non– reporting in Annex III
IT SKUPAJ
TOTAL IT
Slabosti po očitnih napakah in pri pregledih na kraju samem za napake pod 3 %
Weaknesses following the obvious errors and in the on– the– spot checks with errors below 3 %
Neopredeljeni 4 DKOP, nepravilen izračun sankcij, leto zahtevka 2008
4 GAEC not defined, incorrect calculation of sanction, CY 2008
Neopredeljena 2 DKOP, pomanjkljivosti pri pregledih za PZR 4 in odstopanje, uporabljeno za PZR 7, leto zahtevka 2009
2 GAEC not defined, deficiencies in checks for SMR4 and tolerance applied for SMR7, CY 2009
Pomanjkljivosti pri pregledih za PZR 4 in odstopanje, uporabljeno za PZR 7, leto zahtevka 2010
Deficiencies in checks for SMR4 and tolerance applied for SMR7, CY 2010
LV SKUPAJ
TOTAL LV
Slabosti v LPIS, leto zahtevka 2009
Weaknesses in LPIS, CY 2009
Slabosti v LPIS, leto zahtevka 2010
Weaknesses in LPIS, CY 2010
SE SKUPAJ
TOTAL SE
Slabosti v preverjanju majhnih enot rabe ali poljin, opredelitev enote rabe ali poljine
Weakness in verification of small parcels to respect the definition of agricultural parcels
Neekstrapolacija rezultatov kontrol v primeru razlike pod 3 %
Non– extrapolation of control result in case of difference below 3 %
SI SKUPAJ
TOTAL SI
6701 SKUPAJ
TOTAL 6701
EKSRP, os 2 – ukrepi, vezani na površino (2007–2013)
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 2 (2007– 2013, area related measures)
EKSRP, osi 1+3 – ukrepi, usmerjeni v naložbe (2007–2013)
Rural Development EAFRD Axis 1+3 — Investment orientated measures (2007– 2013)
Neustrezna ključna kontrola – podpora plačana neupravičenim upravičencem (neudeležba obveznega usposabljanja)
inadequate key control — support paid to ineligible beneficiaries (compulsory training not attended)
HU SKUPAJ
TOTAL HU
Neobstoj meril za izbor
Lack of selection criteria
PL SKUPAJ
TOTAL PL
Prepozni pregledi na kraju samem
late on– the– spot checks
PT SKUPAJ
TOTAL PT
6711 SKUPAJ
of 10 July 2014
z dne 10. julija 2014
concerning the placing on the market for essential use of biocidal products containing copper
o dajanju biocidnih proizvodov, ki vsebujejo baker, na trg za uporabo bistvenega pomena
(notified under document C(2014) 4611)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 4611)
(Only the Croatian, English, Greek and Spanish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v angleškem, grškem, hrvaškem in španskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1451/2007 of 4 December 2007 on the second phase of the 10-year work programme referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market [1], and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1451/2007 z dne 4. decembra 2007 o drugi fazi desetletnega delovnega programa iz člena 16(2) Direktive 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju biocidnih pripravkov v promet [1] ter zlasti člena 5(3) Uredbe,
Pursuant to Article 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1896/2000 [2], copper was notified for use in product-type 11, as defined in Annex V to Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
V skladu s členom 4 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1896/2000 [2] je bil baker prijavljen za uporabo v vrsti proizvodov 11, kot je opredeljeno v Prilogi V k Direktivi 98/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3].
Pursuant to Commission Decision 2012/78/EU [4] read in combination with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1451/2007, copper is no longer to be placed on the market for use in product-type 11 as of 1 February 2013.
V skladu s Sklepom Komisije 2012/78/EU [4] v povezavi s členom 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1451/2007 se baker od 1. februarja 2013 ne daje več na trg za uporabo v vrsti proizvodov 11.
Pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1451/2007, Croatia, Spain, Ireland and Greece have submitted separate applications to the Commission for permission to allow the placing on the market of biocidal products containing copper for a number of uses.
V skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 1451/2007 so Hrvaška, Španija, Irska in Grčija Komisiji vložile ločene vloge za dovoljenje dajanja biocidnih proizvodov, ki vsebujejo baker, na trg za številne vrste uporabe.
The Commission made the applications publicly available by electronic means.
Komisija je vloge javno objavila v elektronski obliki.
It follows from some of the applications that biocidal products containing copper are used to prevent biofouling in the main water inlet for offshore oil and gas platforms as well as other marine and coastal installations, where that use is essential to avoid blocking the inlet of water used for, inter alia, processing, drinking water and bathing water production, and fire fighting, since blocking that inlet could be fatal for the health and safety of the staff at the installation.
Iz nekaterih vlog poleg tega izhaja, da se biocidni proizvodi, ki vsebujejo baker, uporabljajo za preprečevanje biološkega obraščanja v glavnem dotoku sveže vode za naftne in plinske ploščadi na morju ter za druge obrate na morju in obali, če je ta uporaba nujna za preprečitev zaprtja dotoka vode, ki se med drugim uporablja za predelavo, pridobivanje pitne in kopalne vode ter gašenje požarov, saj je lahko zaprtje dotoka usodno za zdravje in varnost osebja v obratu.
Furthermore, it follows from some of the applications that biocidal products containing copper are used to prevent biofouling in the main water inlet of ships, where that use is essential to avoid blocking the inlet of water used throughout the entire pipework and waterway system of a ship.
Iz nekaterih vlog tudi izhaja, da se biocidni proizvodi, ki vsebujejo baker, uporabljajo za preprečevanje biološkega obraščanja v glavnem dotoku sveže vode na ladjah, kadar je taka uporaba nujna za preprečitev zaprtja dotoka vode, ki se uporablja v celotnem sistemu cevovodov in vodnem sistemu ladje.
This includes the internals of all pipework, such as the fire-suppression system, vital to the safe operation of the ship.
To vključuje notranji del celotnega sistema cevovodov, kot je sistem za gašenje požara, ki je ključnega pomena za varno delovanje ladje.
No comments were received during the public consultation on those applications.
Na javnem posvetovanju o teh vlogah niso bile izražene nobene pripombe.
The Member States having submitted the applications have argued that, in their territories, it is necessary to have an adequate range of technically and economically feasible alternatives available to prevent biofouling in order to reduce the risk of blocking the main water inlet for offshore installations, other marine and coastal installations, or of ships.
Države članice, ki so vložile vloge, so trdile, da je treba na njihovih ozemljih imeti na voljo zadosten razpon tehnično in ekonomsko izvedljivih alternativ za preprečevanje biološkega obraščanja, da bi se zmanjšalo tveganje zaprtja glavnega dotoka sveže vode za plavajoče naprave, druge obrate na morju in obali ali ladje.
It therefore appears likely that not allowing the use of copper for preventing biofouling in the water inlet for offshore oil and gas platforms, other marine and coastal installations, or on ships, in those Member States would currently pose a serious risk for public health.
Zato se zdi verjetno, da bi se trenutno v navedenih državah članicah pojavilo resno tveganje za javno zdravje, če se ne dovoli uporaba bakra za preprečevanje biološkega obraščanja v dotoku vode za naftne in plinske ploščadi na morju, druge obrate na morju in obali ali ladje.
If feasible, the substitution may take some time.
Za zamenjavo, če je izvedljiva, bi bilo potrebnega nekaj časa.
The requested derogations for essential use are therefore currently necessary.
Zato so zdaj potrebna zahtevana odstopanja za uporabo bistvenega pomena.
However, unless a complete application for approval of copper for use in product-type 11 is submitted without undue delay, users of biocidal products containing copper should implement alternative methods for the prevention of biofouling.
Vendar bi morali uporabniki biocidnih proizvodov, ki vsebujejo baker, izvajati alternativne metode za preprečevanje biološkega obraščanja, razen če se brez nepotrebnega odlašanja predloži popolna vloga za odobritev bakra za uporabo v vrsti proizvodov 11.
It is therefore appropriate to require that, in such a case, users in those Member States are actively informed in due time to allow them to ensure that those alternative methods are effective before the biocidal products containing copper have to be withdrawn from the market,
Zato je primerno zahtevati, da se v takem primeru uporabniki v navedenih državah članicah pravočasno in redno obveščajo, da se zagotovi uvedba navedenih alternativnih metod pred datumom, ko je treba biocidne proizvode, ki vsebujejo baker, umakniti s trga –
Subject to the conditions provided for by Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1451/2007, Croatia, Spain, Ireland and Greece may allow the placing on the market of biocidal products containing copper (EC No 231-159-6; CAS No 7440-50-8) for the uses indicated in the Annex to this Decision.
Pod pogoji iz člena 5(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1451/2007 lahko Hrvaška, Španija, Irska in Grčija dovolijo dajanje biocidnih proizvodov, ki vsebujejo baker (št.
If dossiers for the approval of copper for product-type 11 relevant to those uses have been submitted and validated as complete by the evaluating Member State by 31 December 2014 at the latest, Croatia, Spain, Ireland and Greece may continue allowing that placing on the market until the deadlines provided for in Article 89 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] for cases where a substance is or is not approved.
ES 231-159-6; št.