natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Certificates and other documents issued by notified bodies in accordance with Annex V to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 before the entry into force of this Regulation shall be deemed to comply with this Regulation.
Za potrdila in druge dokumente, ki jih izdajo priglašeni organi v skladu s Prilogo V k Uredbi (EU) št. 305/2011 pred začetkom veljavnosti te uredbe, se šteje, da so v skladu s to uredbo.
OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 5.
UL L 88, 4.4.2011, str. 5.
The manufacturer shall draw up the declaration of performance and determine the product-type on the basis of the assessments and verifications of constancy of performance carried out under the following systems:
Proizvajalec pripravi izjavo o lastnostih in določi tip proizvoda na podlagi ocen in preverjanj nespremenljivosti lastnosti, ki so bili izvedeni v okviru naslednjih sistemov:
System 1+
Sistem 1+
The manufacturer shall carry out:
Proizvajalec izvede:
further testing of samples taken at the manufacturing plant by the manufacturer in accordance with the prescribed test plan.
nadaljnje preskušanje vzorcev, ki jih proizvajalec odvzame v proizvodnem obratu v skladu s predpisanim programom preskušanja;
The notified product certification body shall decide on the issuing, restriction, suspension or withdrawal of the certificate of constancy of performance of the construction product on the basis of the outcome of the following assessments and verifications carried out by that body:
Priglašeni organ za certificiranje proizvodov odloči o izdaji, omejitvi, začasnem preklicu ali umiku potrdila o nespremenljivosti lastnosti gradbenega proizvoda na podlagi izida naslednjih ocenjevanj in preverjanj, ki jih izvede ta organ:
an assessment of the performance of the construction product carried out on the basis of testing (including sampling), calculation, tabulated values or descriptive documentation of the product;
ocene lastnosti gradbenega proizvoda, ki se izvede na podlagi preskušanja (vključno z vzorčenjem), izračuna, tabelaričnih vrednosti ali opisne dokumentacije proizvoda;
continuing surveillance, assessment and evaluation of factory production control;
stalnega nadzora, ocenjevanja in vrednotenja tovarniške kontrole proizvodnje;
audit — testing of samples taken by the notified product certification body at the manufacturing plant or at the manufacturer's storage facilities.
presoje – preskušanja vzorcev, ki jih odvzame priglašeni organ za certificiranje proizvodov v proizvodnem obratu ali v proizvajalčevih skladiščnih prostorih.
continuing surveillance, assessment and evaluation of factory production control.
stalnega nadzora, ocenjevanja in vrednotenja tovarniške kontrole proizvodnje.
System 2+
Sistem 2+
an assessment of the performance of the construction product on the basis of testing (including sampling), calculation, tabulated values or descriptive documentation of that product;
oceno lastnosti gradbenega proizvoda na podlagi preskušanja (vključno z vzorčenjem), izračuna, tabelaričnih vrednosti ali opisne dokumentacije tega proizvoda;
testing of samples taken at the manufacturing plant by the manufacturer in accordance with the prescribed test plan.
preskušanje vzorcev, ki jih proizvajalec odvzame v proizvodnem obratu v skladu s predpisanim programom preskušanja.
The notified factory production control certification body shall decide on the issuing, restriction, suspension or withdrawal of the certificate of conformity of the factory production control on the basis of the outcome of the following assessments and verifications carried out by that body:
Priglašeni organ za certificiranje tovarniške kontrole proizvodnje odloči o izdaji, omejitvi, začasnemu preklicu ali umiku potrdila o skladnosti tovarniške kontrole proizvodnje na podlagi izida naslednjih ocenjevanj in preverjanj, ki jih izvede ta organ:
System 3
Sistem 3
The manufacturer shall carry out factory production control.
Proizvajalec izvede tovarniško kontrolo proizvodnje;
The notified laboratory shall assess the performance on the basis of testing (based on sampling carried out by the manufacturer), calculation, tabulated values or descriptive documentation of the construction product.
priglašeni laboratorij oceni lastnosti na podlagi preskušanja (vključno z vzorčenjem, ki ga izvaja proizvajalec), izračuna, tabelaričnih vrednosti ali opisne dokumentacije proizvoda.
System 4
Sistem 4
an assessment of the performance of the construction product on the basis of testing, calculation, tabulated values or descriptive documentation of that product;
oceno lastnosti gradbenega proizvoda na podlagi preskušanja, izračuna, tabelaričnih vrednosti ali opisne dokumentacije tega proizvoda;
factory production control.
tovarniško kontrolo proizvodnje.
No tasks require the intervention of notified bodies.
Nobena naloga ne zahteva posega priglašenih organov.
Construction products for which a European Technical Assessment has been issued
Gradbeni proizvodi, za katere je bila izdana evropska tehnična ocena
Notified bodies undertaking tasks under Systems 1+, 1 and 3 as well as manufacturers undertaking tasks under Systems 2+ and 4 shall consider the European Technical Assessment issued for the construction product in question as the assessment of the performance of that product.
Priglašeni organi, ki izvajajo naloge po sistemih 1+, 1 in 3, ter proizvajalci, ki izvajajo naloge po sistemih 2+ in 4, upoštevajo kot oceno lastnosti proizvoda evropsko tehnično oceno, ki je bila izdana za zadevni gradbeni proizvod.
Notified bodies and manufacturers shall therefore not undertake the tasks referred to in points 1.1.(b)(i), 1.2.(b)(i), 1.3.(a)(i), 1.4.(b) and 1.5.(a)(i) respectively.
Priglašeni organi in proizvajalci zato ne izvajajo nalog iz točk 1.1(b)(i), 1.2(b)(i), 1.3(a)(i), 1.4(b) in 1.5(a)(i).
product certification body:
organ za certificiranje proizvodov:
a body notified, in accordance with Chapter VII, to carry out constancy of performance certification;
organ, ki je v skladu s poglavjem VII priglašen za izvedbo certificiranja nespremenljivosti lastnosti;
factory production control certification body:
organ za certificiranje tovarniške kontrole proizvodnje:
a body notified, in accordance with Chapter VII, to carry out factory production control certification;
organ, ki je v skladu s poglavjem VII priglašen za izvedbo certificiranja tovarniške kontrole proizvodnje;
a body notified, in accordance with Chapter VII, to measure, examine, test, calculate or otherwise assess the performance of construction products.
organ, ki je v skladu s poglavjem VII priglašen za merjenje, preiskovanje, preskušanje, izračun ali drugačno ocenjevanje lastnosti gradbenih proizvodov.
HORIZONTAL NOTIFICATIONS:
HORIZONTALNE PRIGLASITVE:
Reaction to fire
Požarne lastnosti
Resistance to fire
Požarna odpornost
External fire performance
Obnašanje pri požarih z zunanje strani
Acoustic performance
Akustične lastnosti
Emissions of dangerous substances.’
Emisije nevarnih snovi.“
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 569/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 569/2014
amending Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1389/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid originating in the People's Republic of China following a ‘new exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1389/2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz triklorizocianurne kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske po pregledu glede novega izvoznika v skladu s členom 11(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(4) Uredbe,
In October 2005, the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping measures on imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid (‘TCCA’), originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’) by Regulation (EC) No 1631/2005 [2] (‘the original Regulation’).
Svet je oktobra 2005 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1631/2005 [2] („prvotna uredba“) uvedel dokončne protidampinške ukrepe na uvoz triklorizocianurne kisline („TCCA“) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“).
The anti-dumping duty rates ranged from 7,3 % to 42,6 %.
Stopnje protidampinške dajatve so se gibale med 7,3 % in 42,6 %.
By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 855/2010 [3], the Council amended the original Regulation by lowering the anti-dumping duty rate for one exporting producer to 3,2 %.
Svet je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 855/2010 [3] spremenil prvotno uredbo tako, da je znižal stopnjo protidampinške dajatve za enega proizvajalca izvoznika na 3,2 %.
Following an expiry review, pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping measures consisting of individual duties ranging from 3,2 % to 40,5 % with a residual duty of 42,6 % on imports of TCCA originating in the PRC by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1389/2011 [4].
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je Svet z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1389/2011 [4] uvedel dokončne protidampinške ukrepe, in sicer individualne dajatve v razponu od 3,2 % do 40,5 % z 42,6-odstotno preostalo dajatvijo na uvoz TCCA s poreklom iz LRK.
On 3 May 2013, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) received a request to initiate a ‘new exporter’ review pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 3. maja 2013 prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda glede novega izvoznika v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by Liaocheng City Zhonglian Industry Co.
Zahtevek je vložila družba Liaocheng City Zhonglian Industry Co.
Ltd (‘the applicant’), an exporting producer in PRC.
Ltd. („vložnik“), proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK.
The applicant claimed that it did not export the TCCA to the Union during the original period of investigation, i.e. the period from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 (‘the original investigation period’).
Vložnik je trdil, da v obdobju prvotne preiskave, tj. od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004 („obdobje prvotne preiskave“), ni izvažal TCCA v Unijo.
Furthermore, the applicant claimed that it was not related to any of the exporting producers of TCCA which are subject to the abovementioned anti-dumping measures.
Poleg tega je trdil, da ni bil povezan z nobenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom TCCA, za katerega se uporabljajo zgoraj navedeni protidampinški ukrepi.
The applicant further claimed that it had begun exporting TCCA to the Union after the end of the original investigation period.
Vložnik je prav tako trdil, da je začel izvažati TCCA v Unijo po koncu obdobja prvotne preiskave.
The Commission examined the prima facie evidence submitted by the applicant and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je preučila dokaze prima facie, ki jih je predložil vložnik, in ocenila, da zadoščajo za utemeljitev začetka pregleda v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
After consultation of the Advisory Committee and after the Union industry concerned had been given the opportunity to comment, the Commission initiated by Regulation (EU) No 809/2013 [5], a review of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1389/2011 with regard to the applicant.
Potem ko se je Komisija posvetovala s svetovalnim odborom in zadevni industriji Unije dala možnost za pripombe, je z Uredbo (EU) št. 809/2013 [5] začela pregled Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1389/2011 v zvezi z vložnikom.
Pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 809/2013, the anti-dumping duty imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1389/2011 was repealed with regard to imports of TCCA produced and sold for export to the Union by the applicant.
V skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 809/2013 je bila protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1389/2011, razveljavljena za uvoz TCCA, ki jo je vložnik proizvajal in prodajal za izvoz v Unijo.
The product concerned by the current review is the same as that described in the original Regulation, trichloroisocyanuric acid and preparations thereof also referred to as ‘symclosene’ under the international non-proprietary name (INN), currently falling within CN codes ex29336980 and ex38089420 and originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the product concerned’ or ‘TCCA’).
Zadevni izdelek iz sedanjega pregleda je enak izdelku, opisanem v prvotni uredbi, in sicer triklorizocianurna kislina, znana tudi pod mednarodnim nezaščitenim imenom (INN) „symclosene“, in pripravki iz nje s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („zadevni izdelek“ ali „TCCA“), trenutno uvrščen pod oznaki KN ex29336980 in ex38089420.
TCCA is a chemical product used as a broad spectrum organic chlorine disinfectant and bleacher, in particular used for disinfecting water in swimming pools.
TCCA je kemični izdelek, ki se uporablja kot širokospektralno organsko klorovo razkužilo in belilo, zlasti za razkuževanje vode v plavalnih bazenih.
All forms of TCCA and preparations thereof share the same basic characteristics (chemical composition) and properties (disinfectant), are all intended for similar use and are therefore considered as a single product.
Vse oblike TCCA in pripravki iz nje, ki imajo iste osnovne značilnosti (kemična sestava) in lastnosti (razkužilo), so namenjene za podobno uporabo in se zato obravnavajo kot en sam izdelek.
The Commission officially advised the applicant, the Union industry as well as the representatives of the exporting country, of the initiation of the review.
Komisija je o začetku pregleda uradno obvestila vložnika, industrijo Unije in predstavnike države izvoznice.
In order to obtain the information deemed necessary for this investigation, the Commission sent a market economy treatment (MET) claim form and a questionnaire to the applicant and received replies within the deadlines set for that purpose.
Da bi dobila informacije, potrebne za preiskavo, je Komisija vložniku poslala obrazec zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo (TGO) in vprašalnik, ta pa ju je izpolnjena vrnil v predpisanem roku.
The Commission sought to verify all the information it deemed necessary for the determination of the new exporter status and the dumping margin.
Komisija si je prizadevala preveriti vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za določitev statusa novega izvoznika in stopnje dampinga.
A verification visit was carried out at the premises of the applicant in the PRC.
V prostorih vložnika v LRK je bil izveden preveritveni obisk.
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 August 2012 until 31 July 2013 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga je zajemala obdobje od 1. avgusta 2012 do 31. julija 2013 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
‘New exporter’ qualification
Status novega izvoznika
The investigation confirmed that the applicant had not exported the product concerned during the original investigation period and that it had started to export it to the Union after that period.
S preiskavo je bilo potrjeno, da vložnik v obdobju prvotne preiskave ni izvažal zadevnega izdelka in da ga je v Unijo začel izvažati po navedenem obdobju.
As concerns the other conditions for the recognition of a ‘new exporter’ status, the applicant was able to demonstrate that it did not have any links, direct or indirect, with any of the Chinese exporting producers subject to the anti-dumping measures in force with regard to the product concerned.
Glede ostalih pogojev za priznanje statusa novega izvoznika je vložnik dokazal, da ni neposredno ali posredno povezan z nobenim kitajskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katerega se v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom uporabljajo veljavni protidampinški ukrepi.
Accordingly, it is confirmed that the applicant should be considered a ‘new exporter’ in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation and thus an individual margin should be determined for it.
Zato se potrdi, da bi bilo vložnika treba šteti za novega izvoznika v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe in bi mu zato bilo treba določiti individualno stopnjo dajatve.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of Article 2 of the basic Regulation for those exporting producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, i.e. where it is shown that market economic conditions prevail in respect of the manufacture and sale of the like product.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki od 1 do 6 člena 2 osnovne uredbe za tiste proizvajalce izvoznike, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, tj. kadar se izkaže, da pri proizvodnji in prodaji podobnega izdelka prevladujejo pogoji tržnega gospodarstva.
business decisions are made in response to market signals without significant State interference, and costs reflect market values,
poslovne odločitve se sprejemajo kot odziv na tržne signale, brez večjega vmešavanja države, stroški pa odražajo tržne vrednosti,
firms have one clear set of independently audited accounting records in line with international accounting standards (IAS) and applied for all purposes,
podjetja imajo en sam jasen sklop računovodskih evidenc, ki se revidirajo neodvisno, v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi (MRS) in uporabljajo v vse namene;
no significant distortions are carried over from the former non-market economy system,
odsotnost znatnih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva;
exchange rate conversions are carried out at market rates.
pretvorbe valut se izvajajo po tržnih tečajih.
The investigation established that the applicant's accounting records were not in line with international accounting standards and that, therefore, the company's accounting practice does not fulfil the requirements of the second criterion.
Preiskava je pokazala, da vložnikove računovodske evidence niso bile v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi, torej računovodska praksa družbe ne izpolnjuje zahtev drugega merila.
In particular, the applicant failed to report in its accounts the implementation of an incentive scheme for management staff in line with international accounting standards.
Natančneje, vložnik v svojih računovodskih izkazih ni poročal v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi o izvajanju sheme spodbud za vodstveno osebje.
As a consequence, the balance sheet did not faithfully represent the financial position of the company and the profit and loss account and cash flow statement were burdened by financial costs for which there was no justification.
Posledično v bilanci stanja ni bilo prikazano dejansko finančno stanje družbe, izkaz poslovnega izida in izkaz denarnih tokov pa sta bila obremenjena z neutemeljenimi finančnimi stroški.
Based on these considerations, the applicant could not be granted MET.
Na podlagi teh premislekov vložniku ni bilo mogoče odobriti TGO.
The applicant and other interested parties were given an opportunity to comment on the above findings.
Vložnik in druge zainteresirane strani so imeli možnost predložiti pripombe na navedene ugotovitve.
The applicant pointed out that the incentive scheme should be booked in 2013, that it has no connection with the balance sheet of 2012 and that in 2012 the nature of the scheme was not yet determined.
Vložnik je poudaril, da bi morala biti shema spodbud vknjižena v leto 2013 ter da ni v nobeni povezavi z bilanco stanja za leto 2012 in da v letu 2012 narava sheme še ni bila določena.
According to the applicant, such determination would be made in accordance with recommendations to be made by the auditors at the moment of the auditing exercise of the financial accounts for 2013 and could take the form of remuneration, interest on loan or quasi-contribution.
Glede na trditve vložnika bi takšna določitev potekala v skladu s priporočili revizorjev v času revizije finančnih poročil za leto 2013, spodbude pa bi lahko imele obliko osebnega prejemka, obresti na posojila ali nepravega prispevka.
The scheme was contractually concluded upon between the company and the management in 2012.
Družba je pogodbo o shemi z vodstvenim osebjem sklenila leta 2012, vendar tega ni bilo mogoče razbrati niti iz revidiranih računovodskih izkazov za leto 2012 niti iz pojasnil k računovodskim izkazom.
However, there was no indication of it in the audited accounts of 2012, not even in the notes to the financial accounts.
Poleg tega v poslovnem letu 2013 do časa preiskave (novembra 2013) ni bila vnesena nobena vknjižba, ki bi se nanašala na shemo spodbud.
No accounting entry, identifying the incentive scheme, was made during the financial year 2013 up to the time of the investigation (November 2013) either.
Takšna odsotnost poročanja v računovodskih izkazih predstavlja resno kršitev.
This absence of reporting in the accounts is serious.
Dejansko so bile skupne obveznosti v bruto bilanci na koncu obdobja preiskave, tj. 31. julija 2013, sporočene v bistveno manjši meri, saj bi celotni znesek posojil vodstvenemu osebju povečal znesek obveznosti za 14 %.
Moreover, the profit and loss account of 2013 will contain financial costs for which there is no legal basis, since no incoming cash flow corresponding to the incentive scheme occurred and interests were nevertheless effectively paid in 2013.
Prav tako je treba opozoriti, da narava sheme in njeno knjiženje ne moreta biti odvisna od tega, kako ju opredelijo revizorji ter da mora biti knjiženje izvršeno pravilno in pravočasno in ne za nazaj.
As a consequence, the 2013 financial costs will be 9 times higher than the costs reported for 2012.
Zato se nenatančno sporočanje finančnega stanja in tokov v zvezi s shemo lahko šteje za kršitev mednarodnih računovodskih standardov.
Therefore, the financial information contained in the accounts did not provide for a reliable and faithful representation of the financial position of the company.
Po razkritju ugotovitev Komisije je vložnik ponovno vložil zahtevek za TGO, vendar ni predložil nobenih novih argumentov.
It should also be noted that the nature of the scheme and the accounting thereof cannot depend on auditing qualification and that the booking thereof should be correctly made in a timely manner and not retrospectively.
Ugotovitve glede določitve TGO se zato potrdijo.
Therefore, a failure to report with accuracy the financial position and flows related to the scheme, cannot be considered to be in line with international accounting standards.
Normalna vrednost
In reaction to the disclosure of the Commission's findings, the applicant reiterated its request for MET, without however bringing any new argument.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je treba za države brez tržnega gospodarstva in, v kolikor se TGO ne more odobriti, za države v prehodu, normalno vrednost določiti na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
The findings on the MET determination are therefore confirmed.
Kot je navedeno v Uredbi (EU) št. 809/2013, je Komisija nameravala za namen določitve normalne vrednosti za vložnika, če se temu ne bi odobrila tržnogospodarska obravnava, kot primerljivo državo uporabiti Japonsko, ki jo je uporabila že v preiskavi, ki je privedla do uvedbe ukrepov iz prvotne uredbe.
Normal value
Zainteresirane strani so bile pozvane, da predložijo pripombe glede ustreznosti Japonske kot primerljive države, vendar niso predložile pripomb.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, for non-market economy countries and, to the extent that MET could not be granted, for countries in transition, normal value has to be established on the basis of the price or constructed value in an analogue country.
Komisija je prav tako vzpostavila stik s proizvajalci v Združenih državah Amerike, od katerih pa nihče ni bil pripravljen sodelovati.