natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Rightholders should have access, on a non-discriminatory basis, to any social, cultural or educational service funded through such deductions.
Imetniki pravic bi morali imeti nediskriminatorni dostop do vseh socialnih, kulturnih ali izobraževalnih storitev, ki se financirajo s takimi odbitki.
This Directive should not affect deductions under national law, such as deductions for the provision of social services by collective management organisations to rightholders, as regards any aspects that are not regulated by this Directive, provided that such deductions are in compliance with Union law.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati na odbitke v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, kot so odbitki za nudenje socialnih storitev imetnikom pravic s strani organizacij za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, glede kakršnih koli vidikov, ki jih ta direktiva ne ureja, če so ti odbitki v skladu s pravom Unije.
The distribution and payment of amounts due to individual rightholders or, as the case may be, to categories of rightholders, should be carried out in a timely manner and in accordance with the general policy on distribution of the collective management organisation concerned, including when they are performed via another entity representing the rightholders.
Razdeljevanje in plačilo zneskov, do katerih so upravičeni posamezni imetniki pravic oziroma posamezne kategorije imetnikov pravic, bi bilo treba izvesti hitro in v skladu s splošno politiko o razdelitvi sredstev zadevne organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, tudi če to izvaja drug subjekt, ki zastopa imetnike pravic.
Only objective reasons beyond the control of a collective management organisation can justify delay in the distribution and payment of amounts due to rightholders.
Samo objektivni razlogi, na katere organizacija za kolektivno upravljanje pravic nima vpliva, lahko upravičijo zamudo pri razdeljevanju in plačilu zneskov, do katerih so upravičeni imetniki pravic.
Therefore, circumstances such as the rights revenue having been invested subject to a maturity date should not qualify as valid reasons for such a delay.
Zato okoliščine, kot je naložba prihodkov iz pravic brez možnosti predčasnega dviga sredstev ne bi smeli biti upravičeni razlogi za takšno zamudo.
It is appropriate to leave it to Member States to decide on rules ensuring timely distribution and the effective search for, and identification of, rightholders in cases where such objective reasons occur.
Primerno je državam članicam prepustiti odločitve o pravilih za pravočasno razdeljevanje in učinkovito iskanje ter identifikacijo imetnikov pravic, če obstajajo takšni objektivni razlogi.
In order to ensure that the amounts due to rightholders are appropriately and effectively distributed, without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to provide for more stringent rules, it is necessary to require collective management organisations to take reasonable and diligent measures, on the basis of good faith, to identify and locate the relevant rightholders.
Poleg tega je treba od organizacij za kolektivno upravljanje pravic za zagotovitev ustrezne in učinkovite razdelitve zneskov, do katerih so upravičeni imetniki pravic, brez poseganja v možnost držav članic, da določijo strožja pravila, zahtevati, da sprejmejo skrbne in razumne ukrepe v dobri veri, s katerimi se identificirajo in locirajo ustrezni imetniki pravic.
It is also appropriate that members of a collective management organisation, to the extent allowed for under national law, should decide on the use of any amounts that cannot be distributed in situations where rightholders entitled to those amounts cannot be identified or located.
Primerno je tudi, da bi člani organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, kolikor je to mogoče, v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, odločili o uporabi kakršnih koli zneskov, ki jih ni mogoče razdeliti v primerih, ko imetnikov pravic, ki so upravičeni do teh zneskov, ni mogoče identificirati ali locirati.
Collective management organisations should be able to manage rights and collect revenue from their exploitation under representation agreements with other organisations.
Organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic bi lahko upravljale pravice in pobirale prihodke iz naslova njihovega izkoriščanja na podlagi sporazumov o zastopanju z drugimi organizacijami.
To protect the rights of the members of the other collective management organisation, a collective management organisation should not distinguish between the rights it manages under representation agreements and those it manages directly for its rightholders.
Organizacija za kolektivno upravljanje pravic zaradi varstva pravic članov drugih kolektivnih organizacij za upravljanje pravic ne bi smela razlikovati med pravicami, ki jih upravlja na podlagi sporazumov o zastopanju, in pravicami, ki jih upravlja neposredno v imenu svojih imetnikov pravic.
Nor should the collective management organisation be allowed to apply deductions to the rights revenue collected on behalf of another collective management organisation, other than deductions in respect of management fees, without the express consent of the other organisation.
Prav tako se organizaciji za kolektivno upravljanje pravic ne bi smeli dovoliti odbitki od prihodkov iz pravic pobranih v imenu druge organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, razen provizij za upravljanje, brez izrecnega soglasja te druge organizacije.
It is also appropriate to require collective management organisations to distribute and make payments to other organisations on the basis of such representation agreements no later than when they distribute and make payments to their own members and to non-member rightholders whom they represent.
Primerno je od organizacij za kolektivno upravljanje pravic tudi zahtevati, da izvajajo razdeljevanje in plačilo zneskov drugim organizacijam na podlagi takšnih sporazumov o zastopanju istočasno z razdeljevanjem in plačilom zneskov svojim lastnim članom in imetnikom pravic nečlanom, ki jih zastopajo.
Furthermore, the recipient organisation should in turn be required to distribute the amounts due to the rightholders it represents without delay.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba zahtevati od organizacije prejemnice, da tudi sama nemudoma razdeli zneske, do katerih so upravičeni imetniki pravic, ki jih zastopa.
Fair and non-discriminatory commercial terms in licensing are particularly important to ensure that users can obtain licences for works and other subject-matter in respect of which a collective management organisation represents rights, and to ensure the appropriate remuneration of rightholders.
Pošteni in nediskriminatorni poslovni pogoji licenciranja so zlasti pomembni za zagotovitev, da lahko uporabniki pridobijo licence za dela in druge vsebine, ki jih upravlja organizacija za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, ter da imetniki pravic prejmejo ustrezno nadomestilo.
Collective management organisations and users should therefore conduct licensing negotiations in good faith and apply tariffs which should be determined on the basis of objective and non-discriminatory criteria.
Organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic in uporabniki bi zato morali pogajanja v zvezi z licenciranjem voditi v dobri veri in uporabljati tarife, ki bi morale biti določene na podlagi objektivnih in nediskriminatornih meril.
It is appropriate to require that the licence fee or remuneration determined by collective management organisations be reasonable in relation to, inter alia, the economic value of the use of the rights in a particular context.
Primerno je zahtevati, da je višina licenčnin ali nadomestil, ki jih določijo organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, razumna, med drugim glede na ekonomsko vrednost uporabe pravic v danih okoliščinah.
Finally, collective management organisations should respond without undue delay to users’ requests for licences.
Končno bi morale organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic brez nepotrebnega odlašanja odgovoriti na zahteve uporabnikov za pridobitev licenc.
In the digital environment, collective management organisations are regularly required to license their repertoire for totally new forms of exploitation and business models.
V digitalnem okolju morajo organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic svoj repertoar redno licencirati za popolnoma nove oblike izkoriščanja in poslovne modele.
In such cases, and in order to foster an environment conducive to the development of such licences, without prejudice to the application of competition law rules, collective management organisations should have the flexibility required to provide, as swiftly as possible, individualised licences for innovative online services, without the risk that the terms of those licences could be used as a precedent for determining the terms for other licences.
V takšnih primerih in za zagotovitev okolja, ki omogoča razvoj takšnih licenc, brez poseganja v uporabo pravil konkurenčnega prava, bi bila potrebna prilagodljivost organizacij za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, da lahko čim hitreje zagotovijo individualizirane licence za inovativne spletne storitve brez tveganja, da bi pogoji za te licence lahko pomenili precedens za določanje pogojev za druge licence.
In order to ensure that collective management organisations can comply with the obligations set out in this Directive, users should provide those organisations with relevant information on the use of the rights represented by the collective management organisations.
Da bi zagotovili, da lahko organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic izpolnijo obveznosti iz te direktive, bi morali uporabniki tem organizacijam dati na voljo ustrezne podatke o uporabi pravic, ki jih zastopajo organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic.
This obligation should not apply to natural persons acting for purposes outside their trade, business, craft or profession, who therefore fall outside the definition of user as laid down in this Directive.
Ta obveznost ne bi smela veljati za fizične osebe, ki delujejo zunaj okvira svoje trgovske, poslovne, obrtne ali poklicne dejavnosti, za katere potemtakem ne velja opredelitev uporabnika, kot je določena v tej direktivi.
Moreover, the information required by collective management organisations should be limited to what is reasonable, necessary and at the users’ disposal in order to enable such organisations to perform their functions, taking into account the specific situation of small and medium-sized enterprises.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba informacije, ki jih potrebujejo organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, omejiti na razumne, potrebne in dosegljive uporabnikom, da bi takim organizacijam omogočili opravljanje njihovih nalog, upoštevajoč posebni položaj malih in srednjih podjetij.
That obligation could be included in an agreement between a collective management organisation and a user; this does not preclude national statutory rights to information.
To obveznost bi lahko vključili v sporazum med organizacijo za kolektivno upravljanje pravic in uporabnikom; taka vključitev ne izključuje pravic do informacij, ki so določene z nacionalnim pravom.
The deadlines applicable to the provision of information by users should be such as to allow collective management organisations to meet the deadlines set for the distribution of amounts due to rightholders.
Za zagotavljanje informacij s strani uporabnikov bi morali veljati roki, ki organizacijam za kolektivno upravljanje pravic omogočajo upoštevanje rokov za razdeljevanje zneskov, do katerih so upravičeni imetniki pravic.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to require collective management organisations established in their territory to issue joint invoices.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v možnost držav članic, da zahtevajo, da organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic s sedežem na svojem ozemlju izdajajo skupne račune.
In order to enhance the trust of rightholders, users and other collective management organisations in the management of rights by collective management organisations, each collective management organisation should comply with specific transparency requirements.
Za okrepitev zaupanja imetnikov pravic, uporabnikov in drugih organizacij za kolektivno upravljanje pravic v storitve upravljanja pravic, ki jih zagotavljajo organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, bi morala vsaka organizacija za kolektivno upravljanje pravic izpolnjevati posebne zahteve glede preglednosti.
Each collective management organisation or its member being an entity responsible for attribution or payment of amounts due to rightholders should therefore be required to provide certain information to individual rightholders at least once a year, such as the amounts attributed or paid to them and the deductions made.
Vsaka organizacija za kolektivno upravljanje pravic ali njen član, ki je subjekt, odgovoren za razdeljevanje ali plačilo zneskov, do katerih so upravičeni imetniki pravic, bi zato moral posameznim imetnikom pravic vsaj enkrat letno zagotoviti določene informacije, kot na primer zneske, ki se jim razdelijo ali plačajo, in odbitke.
Collective management organisations should also be required to provide sufficient information, including financial information, to the other collective management organisations whose rights they manage under representation agreements.
Prav zato bi bilo treba od organizacij za kolektivno upravljanje pravic zahtevati, da drugim organizacijam za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, katerih pravice upravljajo na podlagi sporazumov o zastopanju, zagotovijo zadostne informacije, vključno s finančnimi informacijami.
In order to ensure that rightholders, other collective management organisations and users have access to information on the scope of activity of the organisation and the works or other subject-matter that it represents, a collective management organisation should provide information on those issues in response to a duly justified request.
Za zagotovitev, da imajo imetniki pravic, druge organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic in uporabniki dostop do informacij o obsegu dejavnosti organizacije in o delih ali drugi vsebini, ki jo zastopa, bi morala organizacija za kolektivno upravljanje pravic v odgovor na ustrezno utemeljeno zahtevo zagotoviti tudi tovrstne informacije.
The question whether, and to what extent, reasonable fees can be charged for providing this service should be left to national law.
Odločanje o tem, če in v kakšni meri se lahko za izvajanje te storitve zaračuna razumno provizijo, bi bilo treba prepustiti nacionalnemu pravu.
Each collective management organisation should also make public information on its structure and on the way in which it carries out its activities, including in particular its statutes and general policies on management fees, deductions and tariffs.
Vsaka organizacija za kolektivno upravljanje pravic bi morala tudi objaviti podatke o svoji strukturi in načinu izvajanja svojih dejavnosti, vključno predvsem s svojimi statuti in splošno politiko glede provizij za upravljanje, odbitkov in tarif.
In order to ensure that rightholders are in a position to monitor and compare the respective performances of collective management organisations, such organisations should make public an annual transparency report comprising comparable audited financial information specific to their activities.
Za zagotovitev, da lahko imetniki pravic spremljajo in primerjajo zadevno delovanje organizacij za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, bi morale take organizacije objavljati letno poročilo o preglednosti, ki vsebuje primerljive revidirane finančne informacije o njihovih dejavnostih.
Collective management organisations should also make public an annual special report, forming part of the annual transparency report, on the use of amounts dedicated to social, cultural and educational services.
Organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic bi morale kot del letnega poročila o preglednosti objaviti tudi posebno letno poročilo o uporabi zneskov, namenjenih za socialne, kulturne in izobraževalne storitve.
This Directive should not prevent a collective management organisation from publishing the information required by the annual transparency report in a single document, for example as part of its annual financial statements, or in separate reports.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela preprečiti organizaciji za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, da objavi informacije, ki jih zahteva letno poročilo o preglednosti, v enem samem dokumentu, recimo kot del svojih letnih računovodskih izkazov, ali v ločenih poročilih.
Providers of online services which make use of musical works, such as music services that allow consumers to download music or to listen to it in streaming mode, as well as other services providing access to films or games where music is an important element, must first obtain the right to use such works.
Ponudniki spletnih storitev, pri katerih se uporabljajo glasbena dela, kot so glasbene storitve, ki potrošnikom omogočajo prenos ali pretočno predvajanje glasbe, in tudi druge storitve, ki zagotavljajo dostop do filmov ali iger, pri katerih je glasba pomemben element, morajo najprej pridobiti pravico do uporabe takih del.
Directive 2001/29/EC requires that a licence be obtained for each of the rights in the online exploitation of musical works.
V skladu z Direktivo 2001/29/ES se za vsako pravico pri spletnem izkoriščanju glasbenih del zahteva pridobitev licence.
In respect of authors, those rights are the exclusive right of reproduction and the exclusive right of communication to the public of musical works, which includes the right of making available.
Kar zadeva avtorje, so te pravice izključna pravica do reproduciranja in izključna pravica do priobčitve glasbenih del javnosti, ki vključuje pravico do dajanja na voljo javnosti.
Those rights may be managed by the individual rightholders themselves, such as authors or music publishers, or by collective management organisations that provide collective management services to rightholders.
Te pravice lahko upravljajo posamezni imetniki pravic, kot so avtorji ali glasbeni založniki, ali organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, ki imetnikom pravic zagotavljajo storitve kolektivnega upravljanja.
Different collective management organisations may manage authors’ rights of reproduction and communication to the public.
Različne organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic lahko upravljajo pravici avtorjev do reproduciranja in do priobčitve javnosti.
Furthermore, there are cases where several rightholders have rights in the same work and may have authorised different organisations to license their respective shares of rights in the work.
Poleg tega ima lahko v nekaterih primerih pravice za isto delo več imetnikov pravic, ki lahko za izdajanje licenc za svoj delež pravic za zadevno delo pooblastijo različne organizacije.
Any user wishing to provide an online service offering a wide choice of musical works to consumers needs to aggregate rights in works from different rightholders and collective management organisations.
Vsak uporabnik, ki želi zagotavljati spletno storitev, pri kateri potrošnikom ponuja širok izbor glasbenih del, bi moral združiti pravice za dela različnih imetnikov pravic in organizacij za kolektivno upravljanje pravic.
While the internet knows no borders, the online market for music services in the Union is still fragmented, and a digital single market has not yet been fully achieved.
Čeprav internet ne pozna meja, je spletni trg za glasbene storitve v Uniji še vedno razdrobljen, digitalni enotni trg pa še ni popolnoma vzpostavljen.
The complexity and difficulty associated with the collective management of rights in Europe has, in a number of cases, exacerbated the fragmentation of the European digital market for online music services.
Zapletenost in zahtevnost, povezani s kolektivnim upravljanjem pravic v Evropi, sta v več primerih povzročili razdrobljenost evropskega digitalnega trga za spletne glasbene storitve.
This situation is in stark contrast to the rapidly growing demand on the part of consumers for access to digital content and associated innovative services, including across national borders.
To stanje je v popolnem nasprotju s hitro naraščajočim povpraševanjem s strani potrošnikov po dostopu do digitalne vsebine in povezanih inovativnih storitvah, vključno preko nacionalnih meja.
Commission Recommendation 2005/737/EC promoted a new regulatory environment better suited to the management, at Union level, of copyright and related rights for the provision of legitimate online music services.
V Priporočilu 2005/737/ES se je spodbujalo novo regulativno okolje, ki bolj ustreza upravljanju avtorske in sorodnih pravic na ravni Unije za zagotavljanje zakonitih spletnih glasbenih storitev.
It recognised that, in an era of online exploitation of musical works, commercial users need a licensing policy that corresponds to the ubiquity of the online environment and is multi-territorial.
Priznalo se je, da v času spletnega izkoriščanja glasbenih del komercialni uporabniki potrebujejo politiko izdajanja licenc, ki ustreza splošni razširjenosti spletnega okolja in se uporablja za več ozemelj.
However, the Recommendation has not been sufficient to encourage the widespread multi-territorial licensing of online rights in musical works or to address the specific demands of multi-territorial licensing.
Vendar priporočilo ni zadostovalo za spodbuditev razširjenega večozemeljskega licenciranja za spletne pravice za glasbena dela ali za obravnavo posebnih potreb večozemeljskega licenciranja.
In the online music sector, where collective management of authors’ rights on a territorial basis remains the norm, it is essential to create conditions conducive to the most effective licensing practices by collective management organisations in an increasingly cross-border context.
V spletnem glasbenem sektorju, v katerem kolektivno upravljanje pravic avtorjev na ozemeljski ravni ostaja norma, je bistveno, da se v vse bolj čezmejnem okviru ustvarijo pogoji za najučinkovitejše prakse licenciranja organizacij za kolektivno upravljanje pravic.
It is therefore appropriate to provide a set of rules prescribing basic conditions for the provision by collective management organisations of multi-territorial collective licensing of authors’ rights in musical works for online use, including lyrics.
Zato je ustrezno, da se zagotovi vrsta pravil, ki določajo osnovne pogoje za zagotavljanje večozemeljskega licenciranja za pravice avtorjev za glasbena dela za spletno uporabo, ključno z besedili pesmi, s strani organizacij za kolektivno upravljanje pravic.
The same rules should apply to such licensing for all musical works, including musical works incorporated in audiovisual works.
Enaka pravila bi morala veljati za takšno licenciranje vseh glasbenih del, vključno z glasbenimi deli, vključenimi v avdiovizualna dela.
However, online services solely providing access to musical works in sheet music form should not be covered.
Vendar spletne storitve, ki omogočajo le dostop do glasbenih del v obliki grafične izdaje glasbenega dela, ne bi smele biti zajete.
The provisions of this Directive should ensure the necessary minimum quality of cross-border services provided by collective management organisations, notably in terms of transparency of repertoire represented and accuracy of financial flows related to the use of the rights.
Določbe te direktive bi morale zagotoviti potrebno minimalno kakovost čezmejnih storitev, ki jih opravljajo organizacije za kolektivno upravljanje pravic, zlasti kar zadeva preglednost zastopanega repertoarja in natančnost finančnih tokov, povezanih z uporabo pravic.
They should also set out a framework for facilitating the voluntary aggregation of music repertoire and rights, thus reducing the number of licences a user needs to operate a multi-territory, multi-repertoire service.
Oblikovati bi morale tudi okvir za lažje prostovoljno združevanje glasbenega repertoarja in pravic, s tem pa zmanjšanje števila licenc, ki jih uporabnik potrebuje za izvajanje večozemeljske storitve, ki vključujejo več repertoarjev.