natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Applicant has demonstrated that both high efficiency alternators of the kind described in this application did not exceed 3 % of the new passenger cars registered in the reference year 2009.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je za ustrezno osnovno tehnologijo primerno šteti alternator s 67-odstotnim izkoristkom, če se inovativna tehnologija vgradi v nov tip vozila.
In order to determine the CO2 savings that the innovative technology will deliver when fitted to a vehicle, it is necessary to define the baseline vehicle against which the efficiency of the vehicle equipped with the innovative technology should be compared as provided for in Articles 5 and 8 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011.
Če se učinkovita alternatorja Robert Bosch GmbH vgradita v obstoječ tip vozila, bi morala biti osnovna tehnologija alternator najnovejše različice tega tipa, ki je na voljo na trgu.
The Commission finds that it is appropriate to consider an alternator with 67 % efficiency as an appropriate baseline technology in the case the innovative technology is fitted on a new vehicle type.
Vložnik je v obeh vlogah zagotovil metodologijo preskušanja zmanjšanja emisij CO2, ki vključuje formule, ki so skladne s formulami iz tehničnih smernic za poenostavljen pristop glede učinkovitih alternatorjev.
Where the Robert Bosch GmbH efficient alternators are fitted to an existing vehicle type, the baseline technology should be the alternator of the most recent version of that type placed on the market.
Komisija meni, da se bodo z metodologijo preskušanja zagotovili preverljivi, ponovljivi in primerljivi rezultati ter da se bodo realno prikazale koristi inovativne tehnologije v zvezi z emisijami CO2 s pomembno statistično značilnostjo v skladu s členom 6 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011.
The Applicant in both applications has provided a methodology for testing the CO2 reductions which includes formulae that are consistent with the formulae described in the Technical Guidelines for the simplified approach with regard to efficient alternators.
Komisija ugotavlja, da vložnikova metodologija preskušanja in formule za izračun prihrankov emisij CO2 v obeh primerih niso v vseh pogledih enake metodologiji, ki je opredeljena v Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2013/341/EU.
The Commission considers that the testing methodology will provide testing results that are verifiable, repeatable and comparable and that it is capable of demonstrating in a realistic manner the CO2 emissions benefits of the innovative technology with strong statistical significance in accordance with Article 6 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011.
Zaradi tega Komisija meni, da bi bilo treba za določitev zmanjšanja emisij CO2 zaradi uporabe visoko učinkovitega alternatorja s HED Robert Bosch GmbH in visoko učinkovitega alternatorja s SAR Robert Bosch GmbH uporabiti metodologijo iz Izvedbenega sklepa 2013/341/EU.
The Commission notes that the Applicant's testing methodology and formulae to calculate the CO2 savings in both cases are in all aspects identical to the methodology specified in the Annex to Implementing Decision 2013/341/EU.
Glede na navedeno Komisija ugotavlja, da je vložnik zadovoljivo dokazal, da je inovativna tehnologija dosegla zmanjšanje emisij za najmanj 1 g CO2/km.
As a consequence, the Commission considers that the methodology specified in Implementing Decision 2013/341/EU should be used to determine the reduction in CO2 emissions due to the use of the Robert Bosch GmbH high efficient alternator with HED and Robert Bosch GmbH high efficient alternator with SAR.
Komisija ugotavlja, da bi bil lahko prihranek zaradi obeh inovativnih tehnologij delno prikazan v okviru standardnega preskusnega cikla, zato bi bilo treba končni skupni prihranek, ki se certificira, določiti v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 8(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011.
Against that background the Commission finds that the Applicant has demonstrated satisfactorily that the emission reduction achieved by the innovative technology is at least 1 g CO2/km.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je poročilo o preverjanju v obeh primerih pripravila družba TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH, ki je neodvisen in priglašen organ, ter da so v poročilu potrjene ugotovitve, navedene v vlogah.
The Commission notes that the savings of both innovative technologies may be partially demonstrated on the standard test cycle, and the final total savings to be certified should therefore be determined in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011.
Glede na navedeno Komisija ugotavlja, da odobritvi obeh inovativnih tehnologij ni treba ugovarjati.
The Commission finds that in both cases the verification report has been prepared by the TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH which is an independent and certified body and that the report supports the findings set out in the applications.
Za namene določanja splošne kode ekološke inovacije, ki se uporablja v zadevnih homologacijskih dokumentih v skladu s prilogami I, VIII in IX k Direktivi 2007/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], bi bilo treba določiti posamični kodi, ki se uporabljata za inovativno tehnologijo, odobreno s tem sklepom.
Against that background, the Commission finds that no objections should be raised as regards the approval of both innovative technologies in question.
Vsak proizvajalec, ki želi izkoristiti ugodnosti, ker je zmanjšal povprečne specifične emisije CO2, da bi izpolnil cilj v zvezi s specifičnimi emisijami s prihranki CO2 zaradi uporabe inovativne tehnologije, odobrene s tem sklepom, bi se moral v svoji vlogi za pridobitev certifikata o ES-homologaciji za zadevna vozila v skladu s členom 11(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011 sklicevati na ta sklep –
For the purposes of determining the general eco-innovation code to be used in the relevant type approval documents in accordance with Annexes I, VIII and IX to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], the individual codes to be used for the innovative technology approved through this Implementing Decision should be specified.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
Any manufacturer wishing to benefit from a reduction of its average specific CO2 emissions for the purpose of meeting its specific emissions target by means of the CO2 savings from the use of the innovative technology approved by this Implementing Decision, should in accordance with Article 11(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011, refer to this Decision in its application for an EC type-approval certificate for the vehicles concerned,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Visoko učinkoviti alternator Robert Bosch GmbH z diodami z visokim izkoristkom (HED), ki je namenjen uporabi v vozilih kategorije M1, se odobri kot inovativna tehnologija v smislu člena 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009.
Article 1
Visoko učinkoviti alternator Robert Bosch GmbH s sinhronim aktivnim usmerjanjem (SAR), ki ima vsaj 78-odstotni izkoristek in je namenjen uporabi v vozilih kategorije M1, se odobri kot inovativna tehnologija v smislu člena 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009.
The Robert Bosch GmbH high efficient alternator with high efficiency diodes (HED) and intended for use in M1 vehicles is approved as an innovative technology within the meaning of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009.
Zmanjšanje emisij CO2 zaradi uporabe alternatorjev iz odstavkov 1 in 2 se določi z metodologijo iz Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2013/341/EU.
The Robert Bosch GmbH high efficient alternator with synchronous active rectification (SAR) having an efficiency of at least 78 per cent and intended for use in M1 vehicles is approved as an innovative technology within the meaning of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009.
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 11(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011 se lahko zmanjšanje emisij CO2, določeno v skladu z odstavkom 3 tega člena, certificira ter vpiše v certifikat o skladnosti in zadevno homologacijsko dokumentacijo, ki sta opredeljena v prilogah I, VIII in IX k Direktivi 2007/46/ES, samo, če so zmanjšanja enaka mejni vrednosti iz člena 9(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011 ali večja.
The CO2 emissions reduction from the use of both alternators referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be determined using the methodology set out in the Annex to Implementing Decision 2013/341/EU.
Posamezni kodi ekološke inovacije, ki ju je treba vnesti v homologacijsko dokumentacijo, ki se uporablja za inovativni tehnologiji, odobreni s tem sklepom, sta naslednji:
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 11(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011, the CO2 emission reduction determined in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article, may only be certified and entered into the certificate of conformity and relevant type approval documentation specified in Annexes I, VIII and IX to Directive 2007/46/EC where the reductions are on or above the threshold specified in Article 9(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011.
za visoko učinkoviti alternator z diodami z visokim izkoristkom;
The individual eco-innovation code to be entered into type approval documentation to be used for the innovative technologies approved through this Decision shall be as follows:
za visoko učinkoviti alternator s sinhronim aktivnim usmerjanjem.
for high efficient alternator with high efficiency diodes,
Člen 2
for high efficient alternator with synchronous active rectification.
Ta sklep začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Article 2
V Bruslju, 30. januarja 2015
This Decision shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Za Komisijo
Done at Brussels, 30 January 2015.
Predsednik
For the Commission
UL L 140, 5.6.2009, str. 1.
The President
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 725/2011 z dne 25. julija 2011 o uvedbi postopka za odobritev in certificiranje inovativnih tehnologij za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz osebnih vozil v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 443/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 194, 26.7.2011, str. 19).
OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 1.
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2013/341/EU z dne 27. junija 2013 o odobritvi alternatorja Valeo Efficient Generation Alternator kot inovativne tehnologije za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz osebnih vozil v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 443/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 179, 29.6.2013, str. 98).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011of 25 July 2011 establishing a procedure for the approval and certification of innovative technologies for reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 194, 26.7.2011), p. 19.
Direktiva 2007/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. septembra 2007 o vzpostavitvi okvira za odobritev motornih in priklopnih vozil ter sistemov, sestavnih delov in samostojnih tehničnih enot, namenjenih za taka vozila (Okvirna direktiva) (UL L 263, 9.10.2007, str.
Commission Implementing Decision 2014/465/EU of 16 July 2014 on the approval of the DENSO efficient alternator as an innovative technology for reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Co uncil and amending Commission Implementing Decision 2013/341/EU (OJ L 210, 17.7.2014, p. 17).
Vložnik je informacije predložil 6. maja 2014.
Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive) (OJ L 263, 9.10.2007, p.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da sta obe vlogi popolni, obdobje, ki ga ima Komisija na voljo za njuno oceno, pa se je v obeh primerih začelo na dan po uradnem prejemu, tj. 7. maja 2014.
1).
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2014/465/EU z dne 16. julija 2014 o odobritvi učinkovitega alternatorja DENSO kot inovativne tehnologije za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz osebnih vozil v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 443/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter o spremembi Izvedbenega sklepa Komisije 2013/341/EU (UL L 210, 17.7.2014, str. 17).
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/162
Sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/162
on the State aid SA.36612 (2014/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by Latvia for Parex
o državni pomoči SA.36612 (2014/C) (ex 2013/NN), ki jo je Latvija izvedla za banko Parex
(notified under document C(2014) 4550)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 4550)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision(s) cited above [1],
ob pozivu zainteresiranim stranem, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami [1],
Previous measures in favour of Parex
Predhodni ukrepi v korist banke Parex
On 10 November 2008 Latvia notified to the Commission a package of State aid measures in favour of AS Parex banka (‘Parex banka’), designed to support the stability of the financial system.
Latvija je 10. novembra 2008 Komisiji priglasila paket ukrepov državne pomoči v korist banke AS Parex (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka Parex) za podporo stabilnosti finančnega sistema.
The Commission temporarily approved those measures on 24 November 2008 [2] (‘first rescue Decision’) based on Latvia's commitment to submit a restructuring plan for Parex banka within six months.
Komisija je 24. novembra 2008 začasno odobrila navedene ukrepe [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: prvi sklep o reševanju) na podlagi zaveze Latvije, da bo v šestih mesecih predložila načrt prestrukturiranja banke Parex.
Following requests from Latvia, the Commission approved two sets of changes to the aid measures concerning Parex banka by decisions of 11 February 2009 [3] (‘second rescue Decision’) and 11 May 2009 [4] (‘third rescue Decision’).
Komisija je po zahtevah Latvije odobrila dva sklopa sprememb ukrepov pomoči v zvezi z banko Parex s sklepoma z dne 11. februarja 2009 [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: drugi sklep o reševanju) in z dne 11. maja 2009 [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: tretji sklep o reševanju).
On 11 May 2009 Latvia notified a restructuring plan for Parex banka.
Latvija je 11. maja 2009 priglasila načrt prestrukturiranja banke Parex.
By decision of 29 June 2009 [5] the Commission came to the preliminary conclusion that the notified restructuring measures constituted State aid to Parex banka and expressed doubts that such aid could be found compatible with the internal market.
Komisija je 29. junija 2009 [5] sprejela predhodni sklep, da priglašeni ukrepi prestrukturiranja pomenijo državno pomoč za banko Parex, pri čemer je izrazila dvome, da bi se lahko ta pomoč štela za združljivo z notranjim trgom.
As a result the Commission decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty and required Latvia to provide information needed for the assessment of the compatibility of the aid.
Na podlagi tega se je Komisija odločila začeti postopek iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe in od Latvije zahtevala, naj predloži informacije, potrebne za oceno združljivosti pomoči.
Between 11 May 2009 and 15 September 2010, several information exchanges and discussions occurred between Latvia and the Commission concerning the restructuring of Parex banka.
Med 11. majem 2009 in 15. septembrom 2010 sta si Latvija in Komisija večkrat izmenjali informacije in razpravljali o prestrukturiranju banke Parex.
During that period Latvia updated the restructuring plan of Parex banka several times.
V tem obdobju je Latvija večkrat posodobila načrt prestrukturiranja banke Parex.
The restructuring plan envisaged a split of Parex banka into a newly established so-called ‘good bank’ named AS Citadele banka (‘Citadele’), which would take over all core assets and some non-core assets [6], and a so-called ‘bad bank’ (‘Reverta’ [7]) which kept the remaining non-core and non-performing assets.
Načrt prestrukturiranja je predvideval razdelitev banke Parex na novoustanovljeno tako imenovano „dobro banko“ z imenom AS Citadele banka (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka Citadele), ki naj bi prevzela vsa sredstva glavne dejavnosti in nekatera sredstva sekundarne dejavnosti [6], ter tako imenovano „slabo banko“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka Reverta [7]), ki naj bi obdržala preostala sredstva sekundarne dejavnosti in nedonosna sredstva.
That split was implemented on 1 August 2010.
Ta razdelitev je bila izvedena 1. avgusta 2010.
By decision of 15 September 2010 [8] (‘the Parex Final Decision’), the Commission approved the restructuring plan of Parex banka, based on commitments undertaken by Latvia authorities submitted on 3 September 2010.
Komisija je s sklepom z dne 15. septembra 2010 [8] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: končni sklep o banki Parex) odobrila načrt prestrukturiranja banke Parex na podlagi zavez latvijskih organov, predloženih 3. septembra 2010.
By decision of 10 August 2012 (‘the Amendment Decision’) [9], the Commission approved amendments to three commitments included in the Parex Final Decision, following a request of Latvia.
Na zahtevo Latvije je Komisija s sklepom z dne 10. avgusta 2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o spremembi) [9] odobrila spremembe treh zavez iz končnega sklepa o banki Parex.
Those amendments: (1) extended the disposal deadline for the CIS loans [10] until 31 December 2014; (2) increased the limit of minimum capital adequacy requirements allowed for Citadele at the level of the bank and the group; and (3) allowed carry-over of previous years' unused caps on lending, whilst respecting the initial market share caps.
Te spremembe so omogočile: (1) podaljšanje roka odprodaje posojil SND [10] do 31. decembra 2014, (2) zvišanje meje zahtev glede minimalne kapitalske ustreznosti, dovoljene za banko Citadele na ravni banke in skupine, ter (3) prenos neuporabljenega omejevanja posojil iz prejšnjih let ob spoštovanju prvotnih omejitev tržnih deležev.
The Commission notes that on 5 June 2014 Latvia has exceptionally accepted this Decision to be adopted in the English language.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Latvija 5. junija 2014 izjemoma soglašala, da se ta sklep sprejme v angleškem jeziku.
The formal investigation procedure
Formalni postopek preiskave
On 1 October 2013 Latvia notified a request for a further amendment to the Parex Final Decision, asking for the postponement of the deadline to divest the Wealth Management Business of Citadele [11].
Latvija je 1. oktobra 2013 priglasila zahtevo za dodatno spremembo končnega sklepa o banki Parex, in sicer za odložitev roka odprodaje dejavnosti upravljanja premoženja banke Citadele [11].
In the course of the assessment of that amendment request, the Commission found out that Latvia had granted State aid to Parex and Citadele over and beyond the aid measures approved by the Commission.
Med oceno tega zahtevka za spremembo je Komisija ugotovila, da je Latvija bankama Parex in Citadele odobrila državno pomoč, ki presega ukrepe pomoči, ki jih je odobrila Komisija.
Between […] [12] and 4 March 2014, several information exchanges took place between Latvia and the Commission with regard to those additional aid measures.
Med […] [12] in 4. marcem 2014 sta si Latvija in Komisija večkrat izmenjali informacije v zvezi z navedenimi dodatnimi ukrepi pomoči.
Latvia submitted information and documents on 30 October 2013, 31 January 2014 and 4 March 2014 (including a revised restructuring plan for Parex banka).
Latvija je informacije in dokumente predložila 30. oktobra 2013, 31. januarja 2014 in 4. marca 2014 (vključno z revidiranim načrtom prestrukturiranja banke Parex).
Since 11 November 2013, the Commission has also received monthly updates regarding Latvia's progress in selling Citadele, a process that had started in October 2013.
Od 11. novembra 2013 je Komisija prejemala tudi mesečna obvestila o napredku Latvije pri prodaji banke Citadele, katere postopek se je začel oktobra 2013.
By decision of 16 April 2014 (‘the Opening Decision’) [13] the Commission informed Latvia that, having examined the information supplied by the Latvian authorities, it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘the Treaty’).
Komisija je s sklepom z dne 16. aprila 2014 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka) [13] Latvijo obvestila, da se je po proučitvi informacij, ki so jih predložili latvijski organi, odločila začeti postopek iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Pogodba).
In the Opening Decision the Commission also invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid, in response to which it received one submission on 23 May 2014.
Komisija je v sklepu o začetku postopka zainteresirane strani tudi pozvala, naj predložijo svoje pripombe o pomoči, pri čemer se je na ta poziv 23. maja 2014 odzvala ena zainteresirana stran.
Latvia has informed the Commission that for reasons of urgency they exceptionally accept that the present Decision is adopted in the English language.
Latvija je Komisijo obvestila, da se zaradi nujnosti zadeve izjemoma strinja s sprejetjem tega sklepa v angleškem jeziku.
The undertaking concerned
Zadevna družba
Parex banka was the second-largest bank in Latvia, with total assets of LVL 3,4 billion (EUR 4,9 billion), as of 31 December 2008.
Banka Parex je bila druga največja banka v Latviji in je imela dne 31. decembra 2008 skupna sredstva v višini 3,4 milijarde LVL (4,9 milijarde EUR).
In November 2008 Latvia acquired 84,83 % of the bank's share capital from the two largest shareholders at a symbolic total purchase price of LVL 2 (approx.
Evropska banka za obnovo in razvoj (v nadaljnjem besedilu: banka EBOR) je aprila 2009 pridobila 25 % osnovnega kapitala in eno delnico banke Parex.
EUR 3), a State aid measure approved by the Commission through the first and second rescue Decisions.
Po razdelitvi banke Parex na dobro in slabo banko leta 2010 ter naknadnih spremembah lastniške strukture so delničarji banke Citadele zdaj Latvija (75 %) in banka EBOR (25 %), delničarji banke Reverta pa Latvija (84,15 %), banka EBOR (12,74 %) in drugi (3,11 %).
After the recapitalisation approved through the rescue Decisions, Latvia further increased its participation in Parex banka to about 95 % through the injection of an additional LVL 140,75 million which took place on May 2009, a measure which was approved by the Commission through the third rescue Decision.
Podroben opis banke Parex do sprejetja končnega sklepa o banki Parex je naveden v uvodnih izjavah 11 do 15 navedenega sklepa.
In April 2009, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (‘EBRD’) acquired 25 % of the share capital of Parex banka plus one share.
Ukrepi pomoči, odobreni za banki Citadele in Reverta
Following the split of Parex banka into a good bank and a bad bank in 2010 along with subsequent changes in the shareholding structure, the shareholders of Citadele are now Latvia (75 %) and the EBRD (25 %), while the shareholders of Reverta are Latvia (84,15 %), the EBRD (12,74 %) and others (3,11 %).
Banki Parex je bilo dovoljeno prejeti več ukrepov pomoči, ki jih je Komisija odobrila v okviru prvega, drugega in tretjega sklepa o reševanju (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklepi o reševanju) ter končnega sklepa o banki Parex.
A detailed description of Parex banka up to the time of the Parex Final Decision can be found in recitals 11 to 15 of that Decision.
Načrt prestrukturiranja, ki ga je Komisija odobrila v končnem sklepu o banki Parex, je določal, da se pomoč za reševanje, ki jo je predhodno odobrila Komisija, podaljša do konca obdobja prestrukturiranja ter razdeli med banki Citadele in Reverta.
The aid measures approved for Citadele and Reverta
V končnem sklepu o banki Parex je bila odobrena tudi dodatna pomoč za prestrukturiranje za banki Reverta in Citadele.
Parex banka was authorised to receive a series of aid measures, approved by the Commission in the first, second and third rescue Decisions (the ‘Rescue Decisions’) as well as in the Parex Final Decision.
Za pomoč, ki je bila po razdelitvi banke Parex začasno odobrena v okviru sklepov o reševanju, je bil določen tudi mehanizem izkoriščanja v zvezi z: