natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This should be without prejudice to national rules of procedure concerning representation and defence before the courts and to the competences and other rights of trade unions and other employee representatives under national law and/or practice.
To ne bi smelo posegati v nacionalna postopkovna pravila glede zastopanja in obrambe pred sodišči ter v pristojnosti in druge pravice sindikatov in drugih predstavnikov zaposlenih v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in/ali prakso.
For the purpose of ensuring that a posted worker receives the correct pay and provided that allowances specific to posting can be considered part of minimum rates of pay, such allowances should only be deducted from wages if national law, collective agreements and/or practice of the host Member State provide for this.
Za zagotovitev, da napoteni delavec prejme ustrezno plačilo, in če se posebni dodatki za napotitev, lahko štejejo kot del minimalne urne postavke, bi se smeli taki dodatki odtegniti od plače samo, če tako določa nacionalno pravo, kolektivne pogodbe in/ali praksa države članice gostiteljice.
Compliance with the applicable rules in the field of posting in practice and the effective protection of workers' rights in this respect is a matter of particular concern in subcontracting chains and should be ensured through appropriate measures in accordance with national law and/or practice and in compliance with Union law.
Skladnost z veljavnimi pravili s področja napotitev delavcev na delo v praksi in učinkovito varstvo pravic delavcev v zvezi s tem sta še posebej pomembni vprašanji v podizvajalskih verigah in bi ju bilo treba zagotoviti z ustreznimi ukrepi v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in/ali prakso ter skladno s pravom Unije.
Such measures may include the introduction on a voluntary basis, after consulting the relevant social partners, of a mechanism of direct subcontracting liability, in addition to or in place of the liability of the employer, in respect of any outstanding net remuneration corresponding to the minimum rates of pay and/or contributions due to common funds or institutions of social partners regulated by law or collective agreement in so far as these are covered by Article 3(1) of Directive 96/71/EC.
Taki ukrepi lahko po posvetovanju z ustreznimi socialnimi partnerji vključujejo prostovoljno uvedbo mehanizma neposredne odgovornosti podizvajalca poleg odgovornosti delodajalca ali namesto njega v zvezi s kakršnimi koli neporavnanimi neto prejemki v vrednosti minimalnih urnih postavk in/ali prispevkov za splošne sklade ali institucije socialnih partnerjev, ki jih ureja zakonodaja ali kolektivne pogodbe, če so zajeti v členu 3(1) Direktive 96/71/ES.
However, Member States remain free to provide for more stringent liability rules under national law or to go further under national law on a non-discriminatory and proportionate basis.
Vendar lahko države članice v okviru nacionalnega prava sprejmejo strožja pravila v zvezi z odgovornostjo ali dodatna pravila na nediskriminatorni in sorazmerni osnovi.
Member States that have introduced measures to ensure compliance with the applicable rules in subcontracting chains should have the possibility to provide that a (sub)contractor should not be liable in specific circumstances or that the liability may be limited in cases where due diligence obligations have been undertaken by that (sub)contractor.
Države članice, ki so uvedle ukrepe za zagotavljanje skladnosti z veljavnimi pravili v podizvajalskih verigah, bi morale imeti možnost določiti, da v posebnih okoliščinah (pod)izvajalec ne bi smel biti odgovoren ali da je lahko odgovornost omejena, kadar je ta (pod)izvajalec sprejel obveznosti primerne skrbnosti.
Those measures should be defined by national law, taking into account the specific circumstances of the Member State concerned, and they may include, inter alia, measures taken by the contractor concerning documentation of compliance with administrative requirements and control measures in order to ensure effective monitoring of compliance with the applicable rules on the posting of workers.
Te ukrepe bi bilo treba določiti v nacionalnem pravu, v njih pa bi bilo treba upoštevati posebne okoliščine v zadevni državi članici; med drugim lahko vključujejo ukrepe, ki jih izvajalec sprejme v zvezi z dokumentacijo o skladnosti z upravnimi zahtevami in nadzornih ukrepov, da bi se zagotovilo učinkovito spremljanje skladnosti z veljavnimi pravili o napotitvi delavcev.
It is a matter of concern that there are still many difficulties for Member States to recover cross-border administrative penalties and/or fines and therefore the mutual recognition of administrative penalties and/or fines needs to be addressed.
Zaskrbljujoče je, da imajo države članice še vedno številne težave pri čezmejni izterjavi upravnih kazni in/ali glob, zato je treba pozornost nameniti vzajemnemu priznavanju upravnih kazni in/ali glob.
The disparities between the systems of the Member States for enforcing imposed administrative penalties and/or fines in cross-border situations are prejudicial to the proper functioning of the internal market and risk making it very difficult, if not impossible, to ensure that posted workers enjoy an equivalent level of protection throughout the Union.
Razlike med sistemi držav članic za izvrševanje naloženih upravnih kazni in/ali glob v čezmejnih primerih ovirajo pravilno delovanje notranjega trga ter lahko otežijo ali celo preprečijo zagotavljanje enake ravni varstva napotenih delavcev v Uniji.
Effective enforcement of the substantive rules governing the posting of workers for the provision of services should be ensured by specific action focusing on the cross-border enforcement of imposed financial administrative penalties and/or fines.
Učinkovito izvrševanje materialnih pravil, ki urejajo področje napotitve delavcev z namenom opravljanja storitev, bi bilo treba zagotoviti s posebnimi usmerjenimi ukrepi za čezmejno izvrševanje naloženih upravnih denarnih kazni in/ali glob.
Approximation of the legislation of the Member States in this field is therefore an essential prerequisite in order to ensure a higher, more equivalent and comparable level of protection necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
Zbližanje zakonodaje držav članic na tem področju je zato nujen predpogoj za zagotovitev višje, bolj enakovredne in primerljive ravni varstva, potrebne za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
The adoption of common rules which provide mutual assistance and support for enforcement measures and the associated costs, as well as the adoption of uniform requirements for the notification of decisions relating to administrative penalties and/or fines imposed for the non-respect of Directive 96/71/EC, as well as of this Directive, should resolve a number of practical cross-border enforcement problems and guarantee better communication and better enforcement of such decisions emanating from another Member State.
Sprejetje skupnih pravil glede medsebojne pomoči in podpore za izvršilne ukrepe in s tem povezane stroške ter uvedba enotnih zahtev za uradno obveščanje o odločbah v zvezi z naloženimi upravnimi kaznimi in/ali globami zaradi nespoštovanja Direktive 96/71/ES in te direktive bi morala rešiti veliko praktičnih težav pri čezmejnem izvrševanju ter zagotoviti boljše obveščanje in izvrševanje takih odločb, ki izvirajo iz druge države članice.
If it emerges that the service provider is indeed not established in the Member State of establishment or that the address or the company data are false, the competent authorities should not terminate the procedure on formal grounds but should investigate the matter further in order to establish the identity of the natural or legal person responsible for the posting.
Če se ugotovi, da ponudnik storitev v resnici nima sedeža v državi članici sedeža ali da so naslov ali drugi podatki o podjetju napačni, pristojni organi ne bi smeli zaključiti postopka iz formalnih razlogov, ampak bi morali zadevo natančneje preučiti, da bi ugotovili identiteto fizične ali pravne osebe, ki je odgovorna za napotitev.
The recognition of decisions imposing an administrative penalty and/or fine and requests to recover such a penalty and/or fine should be based on the principle of mutual trust.
Priznavanje odločb, ki nalagajo upravno kazen in/ali globo, in prošenj za izterjavo take kazni in/ali globe bi moralo temeljiti na načelu medsebojnega zaupanja.
To that end, the grounds for non-recognition or a refusal to recover an administrative penalty and/or fine should be limited to the minimum necessary.
Zato bi morali biti razlogi za nepriznavanje ali zavrnitev za izterjavo upravne kazni in/ali globe omejeni na najbolj nujne.
Notwithstanding the establishment of more uniform rules with respect to the cross-border enforcement of administrative penalties and/or fines and the need for more common criteria to make follow-up procedures more effective in the event of the non-payment, they should not affect the Member States' competences to determine their system of penalties, sanctions and fines or the recovery measures available under their national law.
Ne glede na uvedbo enotnejših pravil v zvezi s čezmejnim izvrševanjem upravnih kazni in/ali glob ter potrebo po okrepitvi skupnih meril za učinkovitejše nadaljnje postopke v primeru njihovega neplačila te določbe ne smejo posegati v pristojnosti držav članic, da določijo lastne sisteme kazni, sankcij in glob, ali ukrepe za izterjavo v okviru njihovega nacionalnega prava.
Therefore, the instrument permitting enforcement or execution of such penalties and/or fines may, if appropriate, and taking into account national law and/or practice in the requested Member State, be completed, or be accompanied or replaced by a title permitting its enforcement or execution in the requested Member State.
Zato je mogoče instrument za izvajanje ali izvrševanje takih kazni in/ali glob po potrebi in ob upoštevanju nacionalnega prava in/ali prakse v zaprošeni državi članici dopolniti ali nadomestiti z naslovom za izvajanje ali izvrševanje v zaprošeni državi članici ali mu tak naslov priložiti.
The more uniform rules should not have the effect of amending or modifying the obligation to respect fundamental rights and freedoms of defendants as well as fundamental legal principles that apply to them as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), such as the right to be heard and the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial or the principle ‘ne bis in idem’.
Enotnejša pravila ne bi smela spreminjati obveznosti spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in svoboščin tožencev ter temeljnih pravnih načel tožencev, ki se zanje uporabljajo, zapisanih v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), kot so pravica do zaslišanja, pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva, pravica do poštenega sojenja ali načelo „ne bis in idem“.
This Directive does not aim to establish harmonised rules for judicial cooperation, jurisdiction, or the recognition and enforcement of decisions in civil and commercial matters, or to deal with applicable law.
Namen te direktive ni uvedba harmoniziranih pravil glede pravosodnega sodelovanja, sodne pristojnosti ali priznavanja in izvrševanja odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah ali obravnava veljavnega prava.
Member States should take appropriate measures in the event of failure to comply with the obligations laid down in this Directive, including administrative and judicial procedures, and should provide for effective, dissuasive and proportionate penalties for any breaches of the obligations under this Directive.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe v primeru neizpolnjevanja obveznosti iz te direktive, vključno z upravnimi in sodnimi postopki, ter zagotoviti učinkovite, odvračilne in sorazmerne kazni za kakršne koli kršitve obveznosti v okviru te direktive.
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably protection of personal data (Article 8), the freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work (Article 15), the freedom to conduct a business (Article 16), the right to collective bargaining and action (Article 28), fair and just working conditions (Article 31), the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial (Article 47), the presumption of innocence and right of defence (Article 48) and the right not to be tried twice for the same offence (ne bis in idem) (Article 50), and has to be implemented in accordance with those rights and principles.
Ta direktiva spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki jih priznava Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti varstvo osebnih podatkov (člen 8), svobodo izbire poklica in pravico do dela (člen 15), svobodo gospodarske pobude (člen 16), pravico do kolektivnih pogajanj in ukrepov (člen 28), poštene in pravične delovne pogoje (člen 31), pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva in nepristranskega sodišča (člen 47), domnevo nedolžnosti in pravico do obrambe (člen 48) ter pravico, da se za isto kaznivo dejanje kazensko ne preganja dvakrat (ne bis in idem) (člen 50), ter jo je treba izvajati v skladu z navedenimi pravicami in načeli.
In order to facilitate better and more uniform application of Directive 96/71/EC, it is appropriate to provide for an electronic information exchange system to facilitate administrative cooperation and competent authorities should use the IMI as much as possible.
Za boljšo in enotnejšo uporabo Direktive 96/71/ES je ustrezno zagotoviti, da se vzpostavi sistem elektronske izmenjave informacij za lažje upravno sodelovanje, pristojni organi pa bi morali kolikor je mogoče uporabljati IMI.
However, that should not prevent the application of existing and future bilateral agreements or arrangements concerning administrative cooperation and mutual assistance.
Vendar to ne bi smelo preprečiti uporabe veljavnih in prihodnjih dvostranskih sporazumov ali dogovorov glede upravnega sodelovanja in medsebojne pomoči.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to establish a common framework of a set of appropriate provisions, measures and control mechanisms necessary for better and more uniform implementation, application and enforcement in practice of Directive 96/71/EC, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, and can rather, by reason of the scale and effects of the action, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the TEU.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer vzpostavitve skupnega okvira sklopa ustreznih določb, ukrepov in nadzornih mehanizmov, potrebnih za boljše in enotnejše izvajanje, uporabo in izvrševanje Direktive 96/71/ES v praksi, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi obsega ali učinkov ukrepov lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 PEU.
The European Data Protection Supervisor has been consulted in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and delivered an opinion on 19 July 2012 [12],
V skladu s členom 28(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 je bilo opravljeno posvetovanje z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov, ki je podal mnenje 19. julija 2012 [12] –
This Directive establishes a common framework of a set of appropriate provisions, measures and control mechanisms necessary for better and more uniform implementation, application and enforcement in practice of Directive 96/71/EC, including measures to prevent and sanction any abuse and circumvention of the applicable rules and is without prejudice to the scope of Directive 96/71/EC.
Ta direktiva vzpostavlja skupni okvir sklopa ustreznih določb, ukrepov in nadzornih mehanizmov, potrebnih za boljše in enotnejše izvajanje, uporabo in izvrševanje v praksi Direktive 96/71/ES, vključno z ukrepi za preprečevanje in kaznovanje kakršne koli zlorabe veljavnih pravil in izogibanja tem pravilom, ter ne posega v področje uporabe Direktive 96/71/ES.
This Directive aims to guarantee respect for an appropriate level of protection of the rights of posted workers for the cross-border provision of services, in particular the enforcement of the terms and conditions of employment that apply in the Member State where the service is to be provided in accordance with Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC, while facilitating the exercise of the freedom to provide services for service providers and promoting fair competition between service providers, and thus supporting the functioning of the internal market.
Namen te direktive je zagotoviti spoštovanje ustrezne ravni varstva pravic delavcev, napotenih na delo z namenom čezmejnega opravljanja storitev, zlasti uveljavljanje pogojev za zaposlitev, ki se uporabljajo v državi članici, kjer se storitev opravlja v skladu s členom 3 Direktive 96/71/ES, ter hkrati olajšati uveljavljanje svobode opravljanja storitev za ponudnike storitev in spodbujati pošteno konkurenco med ponudniki storitev ter tako podpirati delovanje notranjega trga.
This Directive shall not affect in any way the exercise of fundamental rights as recognised in Member States and at Union level, including the right or freedom to strike or to take other action covered by the specific industrial relations systems in Member States, in accordance with national law and/or practice.
Ta direktiva na noben način ne vpliva na uveljavljanje temeljnih pravic, kot so priznane v državah članicah in na ravni Unije, vključno s pravico ali svobodo do stavke ali do drugih ukrepov, zajetih v sistemih odnosov med delodajalci in delojemalci v posameznih državah članicah, v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in/ali prakso.
Nor does it affect the right to negotiate, conclude and enforce collective agreements and to take collective action in accordance with national law and/or practice.
Prav tako ne vpliva na pravico do pogajanj o kolektivnih pogodbah ter sklepanja in izvrševanja takih pogodb ter pravico do kolektivnih ukrepov v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in/ali prakso.
‘competent authority’ means an authority or body, which may include the liaison office(s) as referred to in Article 4 of Directive 96/71/EC, designated by a Member State to perform functions set out in Directive 96/71/EC and this Directive;
„pristojni organ“ pomeni organ ali telo, kar lahko vključuje urad ali urade za sodelovanje iz člena 4 Direktive 96/71/ES, ki jih država članica imenuje za izvajanje nalog, določenih v Direktivi 96/71/ES in tej direktivi;
‘requesting authority’ means the competent authority of a Member State which makes a request for assistance, information, notification or recovery of a penalty and/or fine, as referred to in Chapter VI;
„organ prosilec“ pomeni pristojni organ države članice, ki zaprosi za pomoč, informacije, uradno obvestilo ali izterjavo kazni in/ali globe iz poglavja VI;
‘requested authority’ means the competent authority of a Member State to which a request for assistance, information, notification or recovery of a penalty and/or fine is made, as referred to in Chapter VI.
„zaprošeni organ“ pomeni pristojni organ države članice, na katero je naslovljena prošnja za pomoč, informacije, uradno obvestilo ali izterjavo kazni in/ali globe iz poglavja VI.
Competent authorities and liaison offices
Pristojni organi in uradi za sodelovanje
For the purposes of this Directive, Member States shall, in accordance with national law and/or practice, designate one or more competent authorities, which may include the liaison office(s) as referred to in Article 4 of Directive 96/71/EC.
Države članice za namene te direktive v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in/ali prakso imenujejo enega ali več pristojnih organov, med katerimi je oziroma so lahko urad(i) za sodelovanje iz člena 4 Direktive 96/71/ES.
When designating their competent authorities Member States shall have due regard for the need to ensure data protection of exchanged information and the legal rights of natural and legal persons that may be affected.
Države članice pri imenovanju svojih pristojnih organov ustrezno upoštevajo, da je treba zagotoviti varstvo podatkov za izmenjane informacije ter varstvo zakonitih pravic fizičnih in pravnih oseb, na katere bi to lahko vplivalo.
Member States shall remain ultimately responsible for safeguarding data protection and the legal rights of affected persons and shall put in place appropriate mechanisms in this respect.
Države članice imajo končno odgovornost za zagotavljanje varstva podatkov in zakonitih pravic vpletenih oseb ter v ta namen vzpostavijo ustrezne mehanizme.
Member States shall communicate the contact details of the competent authorities to the Commission and to the other Member States.
Države članice kontaktne podatke pristojnih organov sporočijo Komisiji in drugim državam članicam.
The Commission shall publish and regularly update the list of the competent authorities and liaison offices.
Komisija objavi in redno posodablja seznam pristojnih organov in uradov za sodelovanje.
Other Member States and Union institutions shall respect each Member State's choice of competent authorities.
Druge države članice in institucije Unije spoštujejo izbiro pristojnih organov, ki jo opravijo posamezne države članice.
Identification of a genuine posting and prevention of abuse and circumvention
Ugotavljanje, ali je napotitev prava, ter preprečevanje zlorab in izogibanja
For the purpose of implementing, applying and enforcing Directive 96/71/EC, the competent authorities shall make an overall assessment of all factual elements that are deemed to be necessary, including, in particular, those set out in paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article.
Za namene izvajanja, uporabe in izvrševanja Direktive 96/71/ES pristojni organi opravijo celotno oceno vseh dejanskih elementov, ki veljajo za potrebne, zlasti elementov iz odstavkov 2 in 3 tega člena.
Those elements are intended to assist competent authorities when carrying out checks and controls and where they have reason to believe that a worker may not qualify as a posted worker under Directive 96/71/EC.
Ti elementi naj bi pristojnim organom pomagali pri izvajanju preverjanj in nadzora in ko obstaja utemeljen sum, da delavec ne izpolnjuje pogojev za napotenega delavca v okviru Direktive 96/71/ES.
Those elements are indicative factors in the overall assessment to be made and therefore shall not be considered in isolation.
Ti elementi so okvirni dejavniki celotne ocene, ki jo je treba opraviti, in se zato ne obravnavajo ločeno.
In order to determine whether an undertaking genuinely performs substantial activities, other than purely internal management and/or administrative activities, the competent authorities shall make an overall assessment of all factual elements characterising those activities, taking account of a wider timeframe, carried out by an undertaking in the Member State of establishment, and where necessary, in the host Member State.
Da bi pristojni organi ugotovili, ali podjetje dejansko opravlja večji del svoje dejavnosti, ne le notranjih upravljavskih in/ali administrativnih dejavnosti, opravijo celotno oceno vseh dejanskih elementov, ki so značilni za dejavnosti, ki jih podjetje opravlja v državi članici sedeža in, če je to potrebno, v državi članici gostiteljici, pri tem pa upoštevajo daljše obdobje.
Such elements may include in particular:
Ti elementi lahko zajemajo zlasti:
the place where the undertaking has its registered office and administration, uses office space, pays taxes and social security contributions and, where applicable, in accordance with national law has a professional licence or is registered with the chambers of commerce or professional bodies;
kraj, kjer ima podjetje svoj statutarni sedež in upravo, uporablja poslovne prostore, plačuje davke in prispevke za socialno varnost ter, če je to ustrezno, kjer ima v skladu z nacionalnim pravom dovoljenje za obratovanje ali je registrirano pri trgovinski zbornici ali strokovnih združenjih;
the place where posted workers are recruited and from which they are posted;
kraj, kjer se napotene delavce zaposli in iz katerega so napoteni;
the law applicable to the contracts concluded by the undertaking with its workers, on the one hand, and with its clients, on the other;
pravo, ki se uporablja za pogodbe, ki jih podjetje sklene s svojimi delavci na eni strani in svojimi strankami na drugi strani;