natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 187 and 188 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti členov 187 in 188 Pogodbe,
Council Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 [2] establishes a legal framework laying down the requirements and procedures for, and the effect of, setting up a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 723/2009 [2] določa pravni okvir, ki opredeljuje zahteve in postopke za ustanovitev in delovanje Konzorcija evropske raziskovalne infrastrukture (ERIC).
The support and development of research infrastructures in Europe has been an ongoing objective of the Union, as last reflected in Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] and, in particular, in Council Decision 2006/974/EC [4].
Podpora raziskovalnim infrastrukturam v Evropi in njihov razvoj je stalen cilj Unije, kot je bilo nazadnje izraženo v Sklepu št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3], zlasti v Odločbi Sveta 2006/974/ES [4].
The European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) and the e-Infrastructure Reflection Group (e-IRG) have produced and updated the first ever European Roadmap for Research Infrastructures.
Evropski strateški forum za raziskovalno infrastrukturo (ESFRI) in posvetovalna skupina za e-infrastrukturo (e-IRG) sta izdelala in posodobila prvi evropski načrt za raziskovalne infrastrukture.
Since the entry into force of the Community legal framework for an ERIC in 2009, two European research infrastructures have been awarded ERIC status.
Od začetka veljavnosti pravnega okvira Skupnosti za ERIC leta 2009 sta status ERIC dobili dve evropski raziskovalni infrastrukturi.
Membership of an ERIC is open to Member States, associated countries, third countries other than associated countries and intergovernmental organisations.
Članstvo v ERIC je odprto za države članice, pridružene države, tretje države, ki niso pridružene države, in medvladne organizacije.
Associated countries play an integral role in the preparation and the implementation of European research infrastructures and should be able to participate in ERICs on the same footing as Member States, as they contribute to the scientific excellence of Union research and to the competitiveness of the Union’s economy through their support.
Pridružene države imajo ključno vlogo pri pripravah in izvajanju evropskih raziskovalnih infrastruktur ter bi morale imeti enake možnosti sodelovanja v projektih ERIC, kot jih imajo države članice, saj s svojo podporo prispevajo k znanstveni odličnosti raziskav Unije in konkurenčnosti gospodarstva Unije.
In order to facilitate the participation of associated countries in ERICs, Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 should be amended so that the contributions of the associated countries can be fully reflected in terms of membership and voting rights,
Za lažje sodelovanje pridruženih držav v projektih ERIC bi bilo treba spremeniti člen 9(2) in (3) Uredbe (ES) št. 723/2009, tako da se bodo prispevki pridruženih držav v celoti odražali v smislu članstva in glasovalnih pravic –
Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 are replaced by the following:
V členu 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 723/2009 se odstavka 2 in 3 nadomestita z naslednjim besedilom:
The membership of an ERIC must include a Member State and two other countries that are either Member States or associated countries.
V ERIC morajo biti včlanjene vsaj ena država članica in dve drugi državi, ki sta bodisi državi članici bodisi pridruženi državi.
Further Member States or associated countries may join as members at any time on fair and reasonable terms specified in the Statutes and as observers without voting rights on conditions specified in those Statutes.
Druge države članice ali pridružene države se lahko včlanijo kadar koli pod poštenimi in razumnimi pogoji iz Statuta, lahko pa se priključijo tudi kot opazovalke, brez glasovalnih pravic in v skladu s pogoji iz navedenega Statuta.
Third countries other than associated countries as well as intergovernmental organisations, may also become members of an ERIC, subject to approval by the assembly of members referred to in Article 12(a), in accordance with the conditions and procedure for changes in membership laid down in its Statutes.
Včlanijo se lahko tudi tretje države, ki niso pridružene države, pa tudi medvladne organizacije, če to odobri skupščina članic iz člena 12(a) v skladu s pogoji in postopki za spremembe članstva iz Statuta.
Member States or associated countries shall hold jointly the majority of the voting rights in the assembly of members.
Države članice ali pridružene države imajo skupaj večino glasov v skupščini članic.
For an ERIC hosted by a Member State, proposals for amending its Statutes shall require the agreement of the majority of the Member States that are members of that ERIC.’
Predlogi sprememb Statuta ERIC, ki je na ozemlju države članice, se sprejemajo z večino glasov držav članic, ki so članice tega ERIC.“
OJ C 161, 6.6.2013, p. 58.
UL C 161, 6.6.2013, p. 58.
Council Regulation (EC) No 723/2009 of 25 June 2009 on the Community Legal Framework for a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) (OJ L 206, 8.8.2009, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 723/2009 z dne 25. junija 2009 o pravnem okviru Skupnosti za Konzorcij evropske raziskovalne infrastrukture (ERIC) (UL L 206, 8.8.2009, str. 1).
Council Decision 2006/974/EC of 19 December 2006 on the specific programme: ‘Capacities’ implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013) ( OJ L 54, 22.2.2007, p. 101).
Odločba Sveta 2006/974/ES z dne 19. decembra 2006 o posebnem programu Zmogljivosti za izvajanje Sedmega okvirnega programa Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) (UL L 54, 22.2.2007, str. 101).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1262/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1262/2013
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Puruveden Muikku (PGI)]
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb [Puruveden Muikku (ZGO)]
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Finland’s application to register the name ‘Puruveden Muikku’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s členom 50(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 je bila vloga Finske za registracijo imena „Puruveden Muikku“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Puruveden Muikku’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Ker v skladu s členom 51 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Komisija ni prejela nobene izjave o ugovoru, je treba ime „Puruveden Muikku“ registrirati –
OJ C 140, 18.5.2013, p. 17.
UL C 140, 18.5.2013, str. 17.
Puruveden Muikku (PGI)
Puruveden Muikku (ZGO)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1263/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1263/2013
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Valašský frgál (PGI)]
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Valašský frgál (ZGO))
Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Czech Republic’s application to register the name ‘Valašský frgál’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s členom 50(2)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 je bila vloga Češke za registracijo imena „Valašský frgál“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Valašský frgál’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Ker v skladu s členom 51 Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 Komisija ni prejela nobene izjave o ugovoru, bi bilo treba ime „Valašský frgál“ registrirati –
OJ C 155, 1.6.2013, p. 9.
UL C 155, 1.6.2013, str. 9.
Agricultural products and foodstuffs listed in Annex I(I) to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012:
Kmetijski proizvodi in živila iz točke I Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 1151/2012:
Valašský frgál (PGI)
Valašský frgál (ZGO)
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1264/2013
Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 [3] established the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
Z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 474/2006 [3] je bil vzpostavljen seznam Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Uniji, iz poglavja II Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005.
The Commission informed all air carriers concerned either directly or through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, about the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose on them an operating ban within the Union or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air carrier which is included in the Community list.
Komisija je vse zadevne letalske prevoznike neposredno ali prek organov, odgovornih za regulativni nadzor nad njimi, obvestila o bistvenih dejstvih in pomislekih, ki bi bili lahko podlaga za odločitev o uvedbi prepovedi opravljanja letov v Uniji ali za spremembo pogojev, ki zadevajo prepoved opravljanja letov za letalskega prevoznika, ki je vključen na seznam Skupnosti.
The Commission gave to the air carriers concerned the opportunity to consult documents provided by Member States, to submit written comments and to make an oral presentation to the Commission and to the Committee established by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/1991 (the 'Air Safety Committee') [4].
Komisija je zadevnim letalskim prevoznikom dala možnost vpogleda v dokumentacijo, ki so jo zagotovile države članice, ter jim omogočila, da predložijo pisne pripombe in pripravijo ustno predstavitev Komisiji in Odboru, ustanovljenemu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 3922/1991 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu) [4].
The Air Safety Committee has received updates from the Commission about the on-going joint consultations, in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 and its implementing Regulation (EC) No 473/2006, with competent authorities and air carriers of the states of the Republic of Guinea, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Iran, Madagascar, the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, Mozambique, Nepal, Philippines and Zambia.
Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu je od Komisije prejel posodobitve v zvezi s tekočimi skupnimi posvetovanji (v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005 in njene izvedbene Uredbe (ES) št. 473/2006) s pristojnimi organi in letalskimi prevozniki držav Republika Gvineja, Indonezija, Kazahstan, Kirgizistan, Libanon, Iran, Madagaskar, Islamska republika Mavretanija, Mozambik, Nepal, Filipini in Zambija.
The Air Safety Committee also received information from the Commission on Albania, India, Yemen and Zimbabwe.
Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu je od Komisije prejel tudi informacije o Albaniji, Indiji, Jemnu in Zimbabveju.
The Air Safety Committee also received from the Commission updates about technical consultations with the Russian Federation and concerning the monitoring of Libya.
Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu je od Komisije prejel tudi najnovejše podatke v zvezi s tehničnimi posvetovanji z Rusko federacijo in v zvezi s spremljanjem Libije.
Member States were invited to prioritize ramp inspections on air carriers licensed by states in respect of which Significant Safety Concerns ('SSC') have been identified by ICAO or in respect of which EASA concluded that there are significant deficiencies in the safety oversight system.
Države članice so bile pozvane, naj dajo prednost preverjanjem na ploščadi tistih letalskih prevoznikov, ki so licencirani v državah, kjer je ICAO izrazila resne pomisleke glede varnosti oziroma glede katerih je EASA zaključila, da imajo resne pomanjkljivosti v sistemu varnostnega nadzora.
In addition to consultations undertaken by the Commission under Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005, the prioritization of ramp inspections will allow the acquisition of further information regarding the safety performance of the air carriers licensed in those states.
Poleg posvetovanj, ki jih je izvedla Komisija v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2111/2005, bo tudi prednostno preverjanje na ploščadi omogočilo pridobivanje nadaljnjih informacij o varnosti letalskih prevoznikov, ki so licencirani v navedenih državah.
The Air Safety Committee has heard presentations by EASA about the results of the analysis of ramp inspections carried out under the Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft programme ('SAFA') in accordance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 [5].
Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu je poslušal predstavitve EASA o izsledkih analize preverjanj na ploščadi, izvedenih v okviru programa ocenjevanja tujih zrakoplovov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SAFA) v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 965/2012 [5].
The Air Safety Committee has also heard presentations by EASA about the technical assistance projects carried out in states affected by measures or monitoring under Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu je prav tako poslušal predstavitve EASA o projektih tehnične pomoči, ki se izvajajo v državah, ki jih zadevajo ukrepi ali se spremljajo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2111/2005.
It was informed about the plans of EASA and requests for further technical assistance and cooperation to improve the administrative and technical capability of civil aviation authorities with a view to helping resolve any non-compliance with applicable international standards.
Obveščen je bil o načrtih EASA in prošnjah za nadaljnjo tehnično pomoč ter sodelovanje za izboljšanje upravne in tehnične zmogljivosti organov za civilno letalstvo, da bi lahko pomagali pri odpravljanju kakršnih koli neskladnosti z veljavnimi mednarodnimi standardi.
Member States were also invited to respond to those requests on a bilateral basis in coordination with the Commission and EASA.
Države članice so bile prav tako pozvane, naj se na navedene zahteve odzovejo dvostransko, ob usklajevanju s Komisijo in EASA.
In that regard the Commission underlined the usefulness of providing information to the international aviation community, particularly through ICAO's SCAN database on technical assistance provided by the Union and by its Member States to improve aviation safety around the world.
Komisija je v zvezi s tem poudarila, kako pomembno je, da se, zlasti prek podatkovne zbirke ICAO SCAN, mednarodni letalski skupnosti zagotavljajo informacije o tehnični pomoči, ki jo Unija in njene države članice nudijo za izboljšanje varnosti v letalstvu po svetu.
The Air Safety Committee has also heard a presentation by EUROCONTROL about the status of, and developments in the alarming system which supports the EU SAFA programme.
Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu je poslušal tudi predstavitev Eurocontrola o statusu in razvoju sistema obveščanja, ki podpira program SAFA (program EU).
Particular attention was drawn to statistics for alert messages for banned carriers and to possible system improvements.
Posebna pozornost je bila namenjena statistiki obvestil o prepovedanih prevoznikih in možnim izboljšavam.
Following the analysis by EASA of information resulting from SAFA ramp checks carried out on aircraft of Union air carriers or from standardisation inspections carried out by EASA, as well as specific inspections and audits carried out by national aviation authorities, several Member States have taken certain enforcement measures and informed the Commission and the Air Safety Committee about those measures.
Na podlagi analize, ki jo je izvedla EASA v zvezi z rezultati preverjanj na ploščadi, opravljenih v okviru programa SAFA na zrakoplovih letalskih prevoznikov Unije, oziroma v zvezi s pregledi standardiziranja, ki jih je opravila EASA, ter posebnimi pregledi in revizijami, ki so jih opravili nacionalni organi za letalstvo, je več držav članic sprejelo določene izvršilne ukrepe ter o njih obvestilo Komisijo in Odbor za varnost v zračnem prometu.
Romania informed that the Air Operator Certificate ('AOC') of the carrier Jetran Air was revoked, and Spain informed that the AOC of IMD Airways had expired and is in the process of being revoked.
Romunija je sporočila odvzem spričevala letalskega prevoznika Jetran Air, Španija pa je sporočila, da je spričevalo letalskega prevoznika IMD Airways poteklo in je v postopku odvzema.
Should any relevant safety information indicate that there are imminent safety risks as a consequence of a lack of compliance by Union air carriers with the appropriate safety standards, Member States reiterated their readiness to act as necessary.
Države članice so ponovno izrazile svojo pripravljenost, da bodo v primeru kakršnih koli ustreznih varnostnih informacij o tem, da obstajajo neposredna varnostna tveganja, ker letalski prevozniki Unije ne izpolnjujejo ustreznih varnostnih standardov, primerno ukrepale.
As agreed in the meeting held in Brussels in January 2013, the competent authorities of the Republic of Guinea (DNAC) have regularly provided information on the on-going implementation of the Corrective Action Plan ('CAP'), approved by ICAO in December 2012, as well as all the activities linked to it.
Kot je bilo januarja 2013 dogovorjeno na sestanku v Bruslju, so pristojni organi Republike Gvineje redno poročali o tekočem izvajanju načrta korekcijskih ukrepov, ki ga je ICAO odobrila decembra 2012, kot tudi o vseh z njim povezanih dejavnostih.
The latest progress report, received on 15 October 2013, details the most recent activities and developments regarding the implementation of the CAP.
V zadnjem poročilu o napredku, prejetem 15. oktobra 2013, so opisani najnovejše dejavnosti in napredek pri izvajanju načrta korekcijskih ukrepov.
The designation of and notification to ICAO of Guinea's focal point for Dangerous Goods took place on 3 September 2013.
Gvineja je določila svojo informacijsko točko za nevarno blago in jo sporočila ICAO 3. septembra 2013.
DNAC submitted to ICAO on 30 August 2013 the revised and updated CAP.
Pristojni organi Republike Gvineje so 30. avgusta 2013 ICAO predložili revidiran in posodobljen načrt korekcijskih ukrepov.
All the corrective actions planned for 2012 and first half of 2013 have been implemented and those planned for the 3rd and 4th quarter 2013 are on-going.
Izvedeni so bili vsi korekcijski ukrepi, načrtovani za leto 2012 in prvo polovico leta 2013, ukrepi za tretje in četrto četrtletje leta 2013 pa se še izvajajo.
Validation of these actions by ICAO is pending.
Potrditev teh ukrepov s strani ICAO je v teku.
All previously existing Air Operator's Certificates ('AOCs') having been suspended at the end of March 2013, full ICAO-compliant (5-phase) certification of a national air carrier (PROBIZ Guinée, operating one Beechcraft King Air 90 aircraft) with the help and support of a specific CAFAC/BAGASOO mission is on-going, with simultaneous on-the-job training of DNAC's inspectors on the whole process.
Ker so bila vsa prejšnja spričevala letalskih prevoznikov konec marca 2013 začasno odvzeta, trenutno poteka celotni in z ICAO skladni petstopenjski postopek certifikacije nacionalnega letalskega prevoznika (PROBIZ Guinée, ki opravlja lete z enim zrakoplovom Beechcraft King Air 90), ob pomoči in s podporo misije CAFAC/BAGASOO, hkrati pa poteka tudi usposabljanje na delovnem mestu za inšpektorje pristojnih organov Republike Gvineje o celotnem postopku.
PROBIZ does not operate into the Union.
PROBIZ ne opravlja letov v Unijo.
DNAC has requested an ICVM in order to validate the progress in the implementation of the CAP and ICAO is planning to conduct it in May 2014.
Pristojni organi Republike Gvineje so zahtevali izvedbo misije ICAO za usklajevanje in potrjevanje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ICVM), da se potrdi napredek pri izvajanju načrta korekcijskih ukrepov. ICAO jo namerava izvesti v maju 2014.
Should any relevant safety information indicate that there are imminent safety risks as a consequence of lack of compliance with international safety standards, the Commission would be forced to take action in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005.
V primeru, da kakršne koli pomembne varnostne informacije nakažejo, da obstajajo neposredna varnostna tveganja, ki so posledica neizpolnjevanja mednarodnih varnostnih standardov, bi bila Komisija prisiljena sprejeti ukrepe v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2111/2005.
Air carriers from India
Letalski prevozniki iz Indije
The Commission referred to the continued engagement with the Indian Authorities as regards oversight of its air carriers.
Komisija je poročala o svojem rednem sodelovanju z indijskimi organi, kar zadeva nadzor indijskih letalskih prevoznikov.
The Commission wrote to the Directorate General for Civil Aviation ('DGCA') of India in October 2007 and in January 2010, with respect to certain carriers for which the DGCA has regulatory responsibility and was satisfied with the responses it received.
Komisija je oktobra 2007 in januarja 2010 pisala generalnemu direktoratu za civilno letalstvo Indije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: DGCA) glede nekaterih prevoznikov, ki so pod regulativno pristojnostjo DGCA. S prejetimi odgovori je bila zadovoljna.
In terms of an update on more recent events, there was an ICAO Coordinated Validation Mission ('ICVM') in December of 2012 that resulted in the issue of two significant safety concerns ('SSC') The first SSC related to the certification process for Air Operator Certificates ('AOC') and the second SSC related to the approval of aircraft modifications and repairs of foreign type-certified aircraft registered in India.
Kar se tiče najnovejših dogodkov, je decembra 2012 potekala ICVM, ki je privedla do izdaje dveh resnih varnostnih pomislekov. Prvi se je nanašal na postopek certifikacije za spričevala letalskih prevoznikov, drugi pa na odobritev sprememb in popravil tujih zrakoplovov, ki imajo certifikat tipa in so registrirani v Indiji.
The Commission wrote again to the Indian Authorities on 30 April 2013 to enquire in more detail about the SSCs, as well as to raise other issues pertaining to the routine monitoring of safety information by EASA concerning safety oversight within the Indian State.
Komisija je indijskim organom spet pisala 30. aprila 2013, da bi izvedela več o resnih varnostnih pomislekih in opozorila na druga vprašanja, ki zadevajo rutinsko spremljanje varnostnih informacij o varnostnem nadzoru znotraj indijske države s strani EASA.
The DGCA replied on 10 May 2013 and gave details of corrective actions for the SSCs.
DGCA je v svojem odgovoru z dne 10. maja 2013 podrobno opisala korekcijske ukrepe za resna varnostna pomisleka.
In August 2013 a second ICAO ICVM to India was conducted in order to verify if India had successfully implemented the corrective actions which had been agreed with ICAO.
ICAO je avgusta 2013 v Indiji opravila drugo ICVM, da bi preverila, ali je Indija uspešno izvedla korekcijske ukrepe, o katerih se je dogovorila z ICAO.
Following this ICVM, ICAO removed the SSCs.
Po tej ICVM je ICAO umaknila resna varnostna pomisleka.
The full report of the ICVM is not yet available.
Celotno poročilo o ICVM še ni na voljo.
Of further relevance is the fact that the Federal Aviation Administration ('FAA') of the United States conducted an International Aviation Safety Assessment ('IASA') visit in August 2013.
Pomembno je tudi dejstvo, da je Zvezna uprava za letalstvo ZDA (v nadaljnjem besedilu: FAA) avgusta 2013 izvedla oceno varnosti v mednarodnem letalskem prometu (IASA).
As matters stand at the moment, the Indian State has maintained its FAA Category 1 compliance status.
V okviru te ocene je Indija glede na svoje sedanje razmere pri FAA ohranila status usklajenosti kategorije 1.