natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Council Decision 93/626/EEC of 25 October 1993 concerning the conclusion of the Convention on Biological Diversity (OJ L 309, 13.12.1993, p.
Sklep Sveta 93/626/EGS z dne 25. oktobra 1993 o sklenitvi Konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti (UL L 309, 13.12.1993, str.
Annex I to Document UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/1 of 29 October 2010.
Priloga I k dokumentu UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/1 z dne 29. oktobra 2010.
Council Decision 2014/283/EU of 14 April 2014 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (see page 231 of this Official Journal).
Sklep Sveta 2014/283/EU z dne 14. aprila 2014 o sklenitvi Nagojskega protokola o dostopu do genskih virov ter pošteni in pravični delitvi koristi, ki izhajajo iz njihove uporabe, h Konvenciji o biološki raznovrstnosti, v imenu Unije (glej stran 231 tega Uradnega lista).
Council Decision 2004/869/EC of 24 February 2004 concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (OJ L 378, 23.12.2004, p.
Sklep Sveta 2004/869/ES z dne 24. februarja 2004 o sklenitvi, v imenu Evropske skupnosti, Mednarodne pogodbe o rastlinskih genskih virih za prehrano in kmetijstvo (UL L 378, 23.12.2004, str.
Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC (OJ L 41, 14.2.2003, p.
Direktiva 2003/4/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2003 o dostopu javnosti do informacij o okolju in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 90/313/EGS (UL L 41, 14.2.2003, str.
Regulation (EU) No 512/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 512/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 setting up the European GNSS Agency
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 912/2010 o ustanovitvi Agencije za evropski GNSS
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL,
EVROPSKI PARLAMENT IN SVET STA –
It follows from the combined provisions of Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] and Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] that the European GNSS Agency (the ‘Agency’) is to ensure the security accreditation of the European satellite navigation systems (the ‘systems’) and, to that end, initiate and monitor the implementation of security procedures and the performance of security audits.
V skladu s povezanimi določbami člena 14 Uredbe (EU) št. 1285/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] in člena 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 912/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] mora Agencija za evropski GNSS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) zagotavljati varnostno akreditacijo evropskih satelitskih navigacijskih sistemov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sistemi) ter v ta namen uvajati in spremljati izvajanje varnostnih postopkov in pregled varnosti sistemov.
The systems are defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013.
Sistemi so opredeljeni v členu 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 1285/2013.
They are complex systems and their establishment and operation involve numerous stakeholders with different roles.
Gre za kompleksne sisteme, pri njihovi vzpostavitvi in obratovanju pa sodelujejo številne zainteresirane strani z različnimi vlogami.
In this context, it is crucial that EU classified information be handled and protected by all the stakeholders involved in the implementation of the Galileo and EGNOS programmes (the ‘programmes’) in accordance with the basic principles and minimum standards set out in the Commission’s and the Council’s security rules on the protection of EU classified information and that Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013, which guarantees an equivalent level of protection for EU classified information, apply, where appropriate, to all stakeholders involved in implementing the programmes.
Pri tem je bistveno, da vse zainteresirane strani, ki sodelujejo pri izvajanju programov Galileo in EGNOS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: programa), pri obdelavi in varovanju tajnih podatkov EU spoštujejo temeljna načela in minimalne standarde, določene v varnostnih predpisih Komisije in Sveta za varovanje tajnih podatkov EU, ter da se člen 17 Uredbe (EU) št. 1285/2013, s katerim se zagotavlja enakovredna raven varovanja tajnih podatkov EU, po potrebi uporablja za vse zainteresirane strani, ki sodelujejo pri izvajanju programov.
The stakeholders participating in and affected by the security accreditation process are Member States, the Commission, relevant Union Agencies and the European Space Agency (ESA) and the parties involved in Council Joint Action 2004/552/CFSP [5].
Zainteresirane strani, ki sodelujejo v postopku varnostne akreditacije in na katere ta postopek vpliva, so države članice, Komisija, ustrezne agencije Unije, Evropska vesoljska agencija (ESA) in strani, ki sodelujejo pri Skupnem Ukrepu Sveta 2004/552/SZVP [5].
Considering the specificity and complexity of the systems, the different bodies involved in their implementation and the variety of potential users, security accreditation should be facilitated by appropriate consultation of all relevant parties, such as national authorities of Member States and of third countries operating networks connected to the system established under the Galileo programme for the provision of the Public Regulated Service (PRS), other relevant authorities of Member States, ESA or, if provided for in an international agreement, third countries hosting the ground stations of the systems.
Zaradi specifičnosti in kompleksnosti sistemov, različnih organov, ki sodelujejo pri njihovem izvajanju, in raznolikosti potencialnih uporabnikov bi bilo treba varnostno akreditacijo olajšati z ustreznim posvetovanjem z vsemi zadevnimi stranmi, kot so nacionalni organi držav članic in tretjih držav, ki upravljajo omrežja, povezana s sistemom, vzpostavljenim v okviru programa Galileo, za zagotavljanje regulirane javne storitve (PRS), drugi ustrezni organi držav članic, ESA ali – če je tako določeno v mednarodnem sporazumu – tretje države, ki gostijo zemeljske postaje sistemov.
In order to enable the appropriate performance of tasks relating to security accreditation, it is crucial that the Commission provide all the information necessary to perform these tasks.
Za ustrezno opravljanje nalog, povezanih z varnostno akreditacijo, je bistveno, da Komisija zagotovi vse informacije, potrebne za opravljanje teh nalog.
It is also important for security accreditation activities to be coordinated with the work of the bodies responsible for managing the programmes in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 and other entities responsible for implementing security provisions.
Pomembno je tudi, da se dejavnosti varnostne akreditacije usklajujejo z delom organov, ki so v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1285/2013 odgovorni za upravljanje programov, in drugih subjektov, odgovornih za izvajanje varnostnih določb.
The risk assessment and management approach to be applied should follow best practices.
Pristop glede ocenjevanja in obvladovanja tveganja, ki se uporablja, bi moral slediti najboljšim praksam.
It should include applying security measures in accordance with the concept of defence-in-depth.
Pristop bi moral vključevati uporabo varnostnih ukrepov v skladu s konceptom obrambe v globino.
It should take into consideration the likelihood of the occurrence of a risk or feared event.
Pristop bi moral upoštevati verjetnost nastanka tveganja ali neželenega dogodka.
It should also be proportionate, appropriate and cost-effective, taking into account the cost of implementing measures to mitigate risk compared to the subsequent security benefit.
Pristop bi moral biti tudi sorazmeren, ustrezen in stroškovno učinkovit ter upoštevati stroške izvajanja ukrepov za zmanjšanje tveganj v primerjavi z naknadno doseženo varnostjo.
Defence-in-depth aims to enhance the security of the systems by implementing technical and non-technical security measures organised as multiple layers of defence.
Obramba v globino naj bi izboljšala varnost sistemov z izvajanjem tehničnih in netehničnih varnostnih ukrepov, ki so organizirani kot večplastna obramba.
The development, including the relevant associated research activities, and the manufacture of PRS receivers and PRS security modules, constitute particularly sensitive activities.
Razvoj, vključno z zadevnimi povezanimi raziskovalnimi dejavnostmi, ter proizvodnja sprejemnikov in varnostnih modulov PRS sta posebej občutljivi dejavnosti.
It is therefore essential that procedures be established to authorise the manufacturers of PRS receivers and PRS security modules.
Zato je bistvenega pomena, da se vzpostavijo postopki za odobritev proizvajalcev sprejemnikov in varnostnih modulov PRS.
Moreover, given the potentially high number of networks and equipment connected to the system established under the Galileo programme, in particular for the use of PRS, principles for the security accreditation of those networks and equipment should be defined in the security accreditation strategy, in order to ensure the homogeneity of the accreditation without encroaching on the competence of national entities of the Member States competent in security matters.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba glede na potencialno veliko število omrežij in opreme, ki so povezani s sistemom, vzpostavljenim v okviru programa Galileo, zlasti za uporabo v sklopu PRS, v strategiji za varnostno akreditiranje opredeliti načela varnostne akreditacije teh omrežij in opreme ter tako zagotoviti homogenost te akreditacije brez omejevanja pristojnosti nacionalnih subjektov držav članic, pristojnih za varnostne zadeve.
The application of those principles would allow for consistent risk management and reduce the need to escalate all mitigation actions at system level, which would have a negative impact on cost, schedule, performance and service provision.
Z uporabo teh načel bi omogočili dosledno obvladovanje tveganja in zmanjšali potrebo po zaostritvi vseh ukrepov za zmanjšanje tveganj na ravni sistema, ki bi negativno vplivali na stroške, roke, uspešnost in zagotavljanje storitev.
Products and measures which protect against electromagnetic emanations (i.e. against electronic eavesdropping) and cryptographic products used to provide security for the systems should be evaluated and approved by the national entities competent in security matters of the country where the company manufacturing such products is established.
Proizvode in ukrepe za zaščito pred elektromagnetnim oddajanjem (tj. pred elektronskim prisluškovanjem) ter kriptografske proizvode, ki se uporabljajo za zagotavljanje varnosti sistemov, bi morali oceniti in odobriti nacionalni subjekti, pristojni za varnostne zadeve, tiste države, v kateri ima sedež podjetje, ki takšne proizvode proizvaja.
In relation to cryptographic products, that evaluation and approval should be complemented in accordance with the principles set out in points 26 to 30 of Annex IV to Council Decision 2013/488/EU [6].
Pri kriptografskih proizvodih bi morali to oceno in odobritev dopolniti v skladu z načeli, določenimi v točkah 26 do 30 Priloge IV k Sklepu Sveta 2013/488/EU [6].
The authority responsible for the security accreditation of the systems should endorse the selection of those approved products and measures taking into account the overall security requirements of the systems.
Organ, pristojen za varnostno akreditacijo sistemov, bi moral potrditi izbor teh odobrenih proizvodov in ukrepov ob upoštevanju splošnih varnostnih zahtev sistemov.
Regulation (EU) No 912/2010, and in particular Chapter III thereof, expressly lays down the terms under which the Agency must perform its task concerning security accreditation of the systems.
V Uredbi (EU) št. 912/2010, in zlasti v njenem poglavju III, so izrecno opredeljeni pogoji, pod katerimi mora Agencija opravljati svoje naloge v zvezi z varnostno akreditacijo sistemov.
In particular, it stipulates, as a principle, that security accreditation decisions must be taken independently of the Commission and the bodies responsible for implementing the programmes and that the systems’ security accreditation authority should be an independent body within the Agency, that makes decisions independently.
Na splošno je v njej določeno predvsem, da je treba odločitve o varnostni akreditaciji sprejemati neodvisno od Komisije in subjektov, odgovornih za izvajanje programov, ter da bi moral biti organ za varnostno akreditacijo sistemov samostojen organ znotraj Agencije, ki odločitve sprejema neodvisno.
In accordance with that principle, Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 establishes the Security Accreditation Board for European GNSS systems (the ‘Security Accreditation Board’) which, alongside the Administrative Board and the Executive Director, is one of the three bodies of the Agency.
V skladu s tem načelom se z Uredbo (EU) št. 912/2010 ustanavlja svet za varnostno akreditacijo evropskih sistemov GNSS (v nadaljnjem besedilu: svet za varnostno akreditacijo), ki je poleg upravnega sveta in izvršilnega direktorja eden od treh organov Agencije.
The Security Accreditation Board performs the tasks entrusted to the Agency concerning security accreditation and is authorised to make security accreditation decisions on behalf of the Agency.
Svet za varnostno akreditacijo opravlja naloge v zvezi z varnostno akreditacijo, ki so dodeljene Agenciji, in je pooblaščen za sprejemanje odločitev o varnostni akreditaciji v imenu Agencije.
It should adopt its rules of procedure and appoint its chairperson.
Organ bi moral sprejeti svoj poslovnik in imenovati svojega predsednika.
Given that the Commission, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013, is to ensure the security of the programmes, including the security of the systems and their operation, the activities of the Security Accreditation Board should be limited to the security accreditation activities of the systems and should be without prejudice to the tasks and responsibilities of the Commission.
Glede na to, da bi morala Komisija v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1285/2013 zagotavljati varnost programov, vključno z varnostjo sistemov in njihovega obratovanja, bi morale biti dejavnosti sveta za varnostno akreditacijo omejene na dejavnosti varnostne akreditacije sistemov ter ne bi smele posegati v naloge in pristojnosti Komisije.
This should apply in particular in relation to the tasks and responsibilities of the Commission under Article 13 of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 and Article 8 of Decision No 1104/2011/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [7], including the adoption of any document relating to security by means of a delegated act, an implementing act or otherwise in accordance with those Articles.
To bi moralo veljati zlasti za naloge in pristojnosti, ki jih ima Komisija na podlagi člena 13 Uredbe (EU) št. 1285/2013 in člena 8 Sklepa št. 1104/2011/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7], pa tudi za sprejetje vsakršnega dokumenta, povezanega z varnostjo, z delegiranim aktom, izvedbenim aktom ali kako drugače v skladu z navedenima členoma.
Without prejudice to those tasks and responsibilities of the Commission, in the light of its particular expertise, the Security Accreditation Board should however, within its field of competence, be entitled to advise the Commission on the drawing-up of the draft texts for the acts referred to in those Articles.
Brez poseganja v te naloge in pristojnosti Komisije pa lahko svet za varnostno akreditacijo glede na svoje posebno strokovno znanje in v okviru svojih pristojnosti svetuje Komisiji pri oblikovanju osnutkov besedil aktov navedenih v teh členih.
It should also be ensured that activities relating to security accreditation are carried out without prejudice to the national competences and prerogatives of Member States as regards security accreditation.
Treba bi bilo tudi zagotovi, da se dejavnosti, povezane z varnostno akreditacijo, izvajajo brez poseganja v nacionalne pristojnosti in posebne pravice držav članic v zvezi z varnostno akreditacijo.
In relation to security, the terms ‘audits’ and ‘tests’ may include security assessments, inspections, reviews, audits and tests.
V povezavi z varnostjo lahko izraza „preverjanja“ in „preizkusi“ zajemata varnostne ocene, inšpekcije, preglede, preverjanja in preizkuse.
In order for it to carry out its activities efficiently and effectively, the Security Accreditation Board should be able to set up appropriate subordinate bodies acting on its instructions.
Da bi svet za varnostno akreditacijo svoje dejavnosti lahko izvajal uspešno in učinkovito, bi moral imeti možnost ustanovitve ustreznih podrejenih organov, ki delujejo po njegovih navodilih.
It should in particular set up a panel that will assist in preparing its decisions.
Ustanoviti bi moral zlasti komisijo, ki mu bo pomagala pri pripravi odločitev.
A group of experts of the Member States should be set up under the supervision of the Security Accreditation Board to perform the tasks of the Crypto Distribution Authority (CDA) relating to the management of EU cryptographic material.
Ustanoviti bi bilo treba skupino strokovnjakov držav članic pod nadzorom sveta za varnostno akreditacijo za opravljanje nalog organa za razpošiljanje kriptografskega materiala (CDA), ki se nanašajo na upravljanje kriptografskega materiala EU.
That group should be established on a temporary basis to ensure the continuity of the management of communications security items during the deployment phase of the Galileo programme.
To skupino bi bilo treba ustanoviti začasno, da se zagotovi kontinuiteta upravljanja elementov, povezanih z varnostjo komunikacijskih sistemov, v fazi uvajanja programa Galileo.
A sustainable solution for performing such operational tasks should be applied in the longer term when the system established under the Galileo programme is fully operational.
Trajno rešitev za opravljanje takih operativnih nalog bi bilo treba uvesti naknadno, ko bo sistem, vzpostavljen v okviru programa Galileo, v celoti operativen.
It confers overall responsibility for the programmes on the Commission.
V tem novem okviru je nujno zagotoviti, da lahko svet za varnostno akreditacijo opravlja nalogo, ki mu je dodeljena, popolnoma neodvisno, in sicer zlasti glede na druga dva organa in druge dejavnosti Agencije, ter da lahko preprečuje vsakršno nasprotje interesov.
In addition, it extends the tasks entrusted to the Agency and provides, in particular, for the Agency to play a major role in the exploitation of the systems and in maximising their socioeconomic benefits.
Zato je bistveno znotraj Agencije še bolj ločiti dejavnosti, povezane z varnostno akreditacijo, od drugih dejavnosti, kot so upravljanje centra za varnost Galileo, prispevanje k trženju sistemov in vse dejavnosti, ki jih Komisija s prenosom pooblastila lahko dodeli Agenciji, predvsem tiste, ki so povezane z obratovanjem sistemov.
In this new context, it is essential to ensure that the Security Accreditation Board be able to perform the tasks entrusted to it with complete independence, in particular vis-à-vis the other bodies and activities of the Agency and to avoid any conflicts of interest.
V ta namen bi morala svet za varnostno akreditacijo in osebje Agencije pod njegovim nadzorom svoje delo opravljati na način, ki jima zagotavlja samostojnost in neodvisnost glede na druge dejavnosti Agencije.
It is therefore essential to further separate, within the Agency itself, the activities associated with security accreditation from its other activities, such as management of the Galileo Security Monitoring Centre, contribution to the commercialisation of the systems and any activities that the Commission might entrust to the Agency by way of delegation, in particular those associated with exploitation of the systems.
Znotraj Agencije bi bilo treba med njenimi različnimi dejavnostmi do 1. januarja 2014 vzpostaviti konkretno in učinkovito strukturno razmejitev.
To that end, the Security Accreditation Board and the Agency staff under its control should carry out their work in a manner ensuring their autonomy and independence with regard to the Agency’s other activities.
Notranji kadrovski predpisi Agencije bi morali zagotavljati tudi samostojnost in neodvisnost osebja, ki opravlja dejavnosti varnostne akreditacije, v odnosu do osebja, ki opravlja druge dejavnosti Agencije.
A tangible and effective structural division should be set up within the Agency between its various activities by 1 January 2014.
Zato bi bilo treba Uredbo (EU) št. 912/2010 spremeniti, da se zagotovi večja neodvisnost in okrepijo pooblastila sveta za varnostno akreditacijo in njenega predsednika ter da se ta neodvisnost in ta pooblastila uskladijo z neodvisnostjo in pooblastili upravnega sveta in izvršilnega direktorja Agencije, hkrati pa določi obveznost sodelovanja med različnimi organi Agencije.
The Agency’s internal rules on staff should also ensure the autonomy and independence of the staff performing the security accreditation activities vis-à-vis staff carrying out other Agency activities.
Pri imenovanju članov svetov ter volitvah njunih predsednikov in namestnikov predsednikov bi bilo treba, kjer je to primerno, upoštevati pomen uravnotežene zastopanosti spolov.
Regulation (EU) No 912/2010 should therefore be amended in order to increase the independence and powers of the Security Accreditation Board and its chairperson and broadly to align that independence and those powers to the independence and powers of the Administrative Board and of the Executive Director of the Agency respectively, while providing for a cooperation requirement between the various bodies of the Agency.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba upoštevati ustrezne upravne, vodstvene in proračunske sposobnosti.
When appointing members of the Boards and electing their Chairpersons and Deputy Chairpersons, the importance of balanced gender representation should be taken into account, where appropriate.
Svet za varnostno akreditacijo – in ne upravni svet – bi moral pripraviti in odobriti tisti del delovnih programov Agencije, ki se nanaša na operativne dejavnosti, povezane z varnostno akreditacijo sistemov, in tisti del letnega poročila o dejavnostih in prihodnjih možnostih Agencije, ki je povezan z dejavnostmi varnostne akreditacije sistemov.
Furthermore, relevant managerial, administrative and budgetary skills should also be taken into account.
Moral bi ju pravočasno predloži upravnemu svetu, da se lahko vključita v delovni program in letno poročilo Agencije.
The Security Accreditation Board, rather than the Administrative Board, should prepare and approve that part of the Agency’s work programmes describing the operational activities associated with the security accreditation of the systems, as well as that part of the annual report concerning the activities and prospects of the Agency with regard to the systems’ security accreditation activities.
Opravljati bi moral tudi disciplinski nadzor nad svojim predsednikom.
It should submit them in good time to the Administrative Board so that they can be incorporated in the Agency’s work programme and annual report.
Zaželeno je, da se predsedniku sveta za varnostno akreditacijo v zvezi z dejavnostmi varnostne akreditacije dodeli vloga, primerljiva z vlogo, ki jo ima izvršilni direktor pri drugih dejavnostih Agencije.
It should also exercise disciplinary authority over its Chairperson.
Predsednik sveta za varnostno akreditacijo bi moral zato poleg funkcije zastopanja Agencije, ki je bila določena že z Uredbo (EU) št. 912/2010, upravljati dejavnosti varnostne akreditacije pod vodstvom sveta za varnostno akreditacijo in zagotavljati izvajanje tistega dela delovnih programov Agencije, ki je povezan z akreditacijo.
It is desirable to assign a role in relation to security accreditation activities to the Chairperson of the Security Accreditation Board comparable to that of the Executive Director in other Agency activities.
Na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta bi moral predsednik sveta za varnostno akreditacijo tudi predložiti poročilo o opravljanju nalog sveta za varnostno akreditacijo in dati izjavo pred tema institucijama.