natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Such coordination is needed to ensure the effect of the principles of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and in particular the free movement of goods, the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services as well as the principles deriving therefrom, such as equal treatment, non-discrimination, mutual recognition, proportionality and transparency.
Tako usklajevanje je potrebno, da se zagotovi učinek načel iz Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), zlasti načel prostega pretoka blaga, svobode ustanavljanja in svobode opravljanja storitev ter iz njih izhajajočih načel, kot so enaka obravnava, nediskriminacija, vzajemno priznavanje, sorazmernost in transparentnost.
In view of the nature of the sectors affected, the coordination of procurement procedures at the level of the Union should, while safeguarding the application of those principles, establish a framework for sound commercial practice and should allow maximum flexibility.
Usklajevanje postopkov javnega naročanja na ravni Unije bi moralo glede na naravo sektorjev, na katere vpliva, ob varovanju uporabe navedenih načel vzpostaviti okvir za premišljeno poslovno prakso in omogočiti največjo možno prožnost.
For procurement the value of which is lower than the thresholds triggering the application of the provisions of Union coordination, it is advisable to recall the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding the proper application of the rules and principles of the TFEU.
Za naročila, katerih vrednost je nižja od mejnih vrednosti za uporabo določb o usklajevanju na ravni Unije, je priporočljivo upoštevati sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije v zvezi s pravilno uporabo pravil in načel iz PDEU.
Public procurement plays a key role in the Europe 2020 strategy, set out in the Commission Communication of 3 March 2010 entitled ‘Europe 2020, a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (‘Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’), as one of the market-based instruments to be used to achieve smart, sustainable and inclusive growth while ensuring the most efficient use of public funds.
Javna naročila imajo ključno vlogo pri strategiji Evropa 2020, določeni v Sporočilu Komisije z dne 3. marca 2010 z naslovom „Evropa 2020 “ (v nadaljnjem besedilu: strategija Evropa 2020 za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast), saj gre za enega od tržnih instrumentov, ki jih je treba uporabiti za doseganje pametne, trajnostne in vključujoče rasti ob hkratnem zagotavljanju najučinkovitejše rabe javnih sredstev.
For that purpose, the public procurement rules adopted pursuant to Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] and Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] should be revised and modernised in order to increase the efficiency of public spending, facilitating in particular the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in public procurement and to enable procurers to make better use of public procurement in support of common societal goals.
V ta namen bi bilo treba pregledati in posodobiti pravila o javnem naročanju, sprejeta v skladu z Direktivo 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] in Direktivo 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5], da bi povečali učinkovitost javne porabe, olajšali predvsem sodelovanje malih in srednjih podjetij (MSP) pri javnih naročilih, naročnikom pa omogočili boljšo uporabo javnih naročil v podporo skupnim družbenim ciljem.
There is also a need to clarify basic notions and concepts to ensure better legal certainty and to incorporate certain aspects of related well-established case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Treba je tudi pojasniti osnovne pojme in koncepte, da bi zagotovili večjo pravno varnost in upoštevali nekatere vidike s tem povezane ustaljene sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije.
It is appropriate that the notion of procurement is as close as possible to that applied pursuant to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament of the Council [7], having due regard to the specificities of the sectors covered by this Directive.
Primerno je, da je pojem naročil čim bližje tistemu, ki se uporablja na podlagi Direktive 2014/24/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7], ob upoštevanju posebnosti, ki so značilne za sektorje, zajete v tej direktivi.
It should be recalled that nothing in this Directive obliges Member States to contract out or externalise the provision of services that they wish to provide themselves or to organise by means other than procurement within the meaning of this Directive.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba, da nobena določba v tej direktivi držav članic ne zavezuje, da storitve, ki jih želijo opravljati same ali jih organizirati drugače kot v obliki javnega naročanja v smislu te direktive, oddajo v podizvajanje ali njihovo izvajanje prenesejo na zunanje izvajalce.
The provision of services based on laws, regulations or employment contracts, should not be covered.
Opravljanje storitev na podlagi zakonov, predpisov ali pogodb o zaposlitvi ne bi smelo biti zajeto.
In some Member States, this might for example be the case for the provision of certain services to the community, such as the supply of drinking water.
V nekaterih državah članicah bi to na primer lahko veljalo za opravljanje nekaterih storitev za skupnost, kot je dobava pitne vode.
It should equally be recalled that Member States are free to organise the provision of compulsory social services or of other services such as postal services either as services of general economic interest or as non-economic services of general interest or as a mixture thereof.
Prav tako bi bilo treba opozoriti, da lahko države članice opravljanje storitev obveznega socialnega zavarovanja ali drugih storitev, kot so poštne storitve, organizirajo kot opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, kot opravljanje negospodarskih storitev splošnega pomena ali kot kombinacijo obeh.
It should finally be recalled that this Directive is without prejudice to the freedom of national, regional and local authorities to define, in conformity with Union law, services of general economic interest, their scope and the characteristics of the service to be provided, including any conditions regarding the quality of the service, in order to pursue their public policy objectives.
Nazadnje bi bilo treba opozoriti, da ta direktiva ne vpliva na možnost nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih organov, da v skladu s pravom Unije pri izpolnjevanju ciljev svoje javne politike opredelijo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, njihov obseg in značilnosti storitve, ki se opravlja, vključno s kakršnimi koli pogoji glede kakovosti storitve.
This Directive should also be without prejudice to the power of national, regional and local authorities to provide, commission and finance services of general economic interest in accordance with Article 14 TFEU and Protocol No 26 on Services of General Interest annexed to the TFEU and to the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
Ta direktiva prav tako ne bi smela vplivati na pristojnost nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih organov, da v skladu s členom 14 PDEU in Protokolom (št. 26) o storitvah splošnega pomena, ki je priložen PDEU in Pogodbi o Evropski uniji (PEU), opravljajo, naročajo in financirajo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
In addition, this Directive does not deal with the funding of services of general economic interest or with systems of aids granted by Member States, in particular in the social field, in accordance with Union rules on competition.
Poleg tega ta direktiva ne obravnava financiranja storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena ali sistemov pomoči, ki jih v skladu s pravili Unije o konkurenci dodelijo države članice, zlasti na socialnem področju.
A contract should be deemed to be a works contract only if its subject-matter specifically covers the execution of activities listed in Annex I, even if the contract covers the provision of other services necessary for the execution of such activities.
Za javno naročilo bi se moralo šteti, da je javno naročilo gradenj le, če njegov predmet izrecno zajema izvedbo dejavnosti s seznama v Prilogi I, tudi takrat, ko javno naročilo zajema opravljanje drugih storitev, potrebnih za izvedbo teh dejavnosti.
Service contracts, in particular in the sphere of property management services, may, in certain circumstances, include works.
Javna naročila storitev, zlasti na področju gospodarjenja z nepremičninami, lahko v nekaterih primerih vključujejo gradnje.
However, in so far as such works are incidental to the principal subject-matter of the contract, and are a possible consequence thereof or a complement thereto, the fact that such works are included in the contract does not justify the qualification of the service contract as a works contract.
Če so te gradnje priložnostne glede na osnovni predmet javnega naročila in so torej njegova morebitna posledica ali dopolnitev, pa se zaradi dejstva, da so te gradnje vključene v javno naročilo, javno naročilo storitev ne more opredeliti kot javno naročilo gradenj.
However, in view of the diversity of works contracts, contracting entities should be able to make provision for contracts for the design and execution of work to be awarded either separately or jointly.
Zaradi raznolikosti javnih naročil gradenj bi morali naročniki imeti možnost določiti, da se javna naročila projektiranja in izvedbe gradenj oddajo bodisi ločeno bodisi skupaj.
The realisation of a work corresponding to the requirements specified by a contracting entity requires that the entity in question must have taken measures to define the type of the work or, at the very least, have had a decisive influence on its design.
Izvedba gradnje v skladu z zahtevami naročnika predpostavlja, da mora slednji vnaprej natančno opredeliti vrsto gradnje ali vsaj odločilno vplivati na njeno projektiranje.
Whether the contractor realises all or part of the work by his own means or ensures their realisation by other means should not change the classification of the contract as a works contract, as long as the contractor assumes a direct or indirect obligation that is legally enforceable to ensure that the works will be realised.
Javno naročilo bi moralo biti uvrščeno med javna naročila gradenj, ne glede na to, ali izvajalec celotno gradnjo ali del gradnje opravi sam oziroma zagotovi, da se opravi kako drugače, pod pogojem, da izvajalca neposredno ali posredno zavezuje pravno izvršljiva obveznost dokončanja gradnje.
To clarify that the scope of this Directive ratione personae should remain unaltered, it is appropriate to maintain the definitions on which the Court based itself and to incorporate a certain number of clarifications given by that case-law as a key to the understanding of the definitions themselves, without the intention of altering the understanding of the concept as elaborated by the case-law.
V pojasnilo, da bi moralo področje uporabe te direktive, kar zadeva osebno veljavnost, ostati nespremenjeno, je primerno obdržati opredelitev, na katero se je oprlo Sodišče, in vključiti nekatera pojasnila iz navedene sodne prakse kot ključ za razumevanje opredelitev samih, pri čemer ni namen spreminjati razumevanje pojma, kakor je podrobno opredeljen v sodni praksi.
For that purpose, it should be clarified that a body which operates in normal market conditions, aims to make a profit, and bears the losses resulting from the exercise of its activity should not be considered as being a ‘body governed by public law’ since the needs in the general interest, that it has been set up to meet or been given the task of meeting, can be deemed to have an industrial or commercial character.
V ta namen bi bilo treba pojasniti, da se oseba, ki deluje v običajnih tržnih razmerah, si prizadeva za dobiček in nosi izgube, ki izhajajo iz opravljanja njene dejavnosti, ne bi smela šteti za „osebo javnega prava“, saj se lahko šteje, da so potrebe splošnega interesa, za katerih izpolnjevanje je bila ustanovljena ali zadolžena, industrijske ali poslovne narave.
Similarly, the condition relating to the origin of the funding of the body considered, has also been examined in the case-law, which has clarified, inter alia, that being financed for ‘the most part’ means for more than half, and that such financing may include payments from users which are imposed, calculated and collected in accordance with rules of public law.
Podobno je bil v sodni praksi preučen tudi pogoj glede izvora financiranja zadevne osebe, kjer je med drugim pojasnjeno, da „pretežno“ financiranje pomeni več kot polovično in da so lahko del takega financiranja plačila uporabnikov, ki so določena, izračunana in prejeta v skladu s pravili javnega prava.
In the case of mixed contracts, the applicable rules should be determined with respect to the main subject of the contract where the different parts which constitute the contract are objectively not separable.
V primeru mešanih javnih naročil bi bilo treba veljavna pravila določiti glede na glavni predmet naročila, če so različni sestavni deli javnega naročila objektivno neločljivi.
It should therefore be clarified how contracting entities should determine whether the different parts are separable or not.
Zato bi bilo treba pojasniti, kako naj bi naročniki določili, ali so različni deli ločljivi ali ne.
The determination should be carried out on a case-by-case basis, in which the expressed or presumed intentions of the contracting entity to regard the various aspects making up a mixed contract as indivisible should not be sufficient, but should be supported by objective evidence capable of justifying them and of establishing the need to conclude a single contract.
Ločljivost ali neločljivost različnih delov bi se morala določiti za vsak primer posebej, pri čemer izraženi ali domnevni nameni naročnika, da se različni vidiki, ki sestavljajo mešano javno naročilo, obravnavajo kot neločljivi, ne bi smeli zadostovati, temveč bi jih bilo treba podpreti z objektivnimi dokazi, ki bi te namene lahko upravičili in bi lahko potrdili potrebo po sklenitvi enotne pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila.
Such a justified need to conclude a single contract could for instance be present in the case of the construction of one single building, a part of which is to be used directly by the contracting entity concerned and another part to be operated on a concessions basis, for instance to provide parking facilities to the public.
Taka upravičena potreba po sklenitvi enotne pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila bi lahko bila denimo prisotna v primeru gradnje ene same stavbe, del katere bi neposredno uporabljal zadevni naročnik, z drugim delom pa bi se upravljalo na podlagi koncesije, na primer za zagotavljanje javnih parkirnih mest.
It should be clarified that the need to conclude a single contract may be due to reasons both of a technical nature and of an economic nature.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da se potreba po sklenitvi enotne pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila lahko pojavi zaradi razlogov tehnične in gospodarske narave.
In the case of mixed contracts, which can be separated, contracting entities are always free to award separate contracts for the separate parts of the mixed contract, in which case the provisions applicable to each separate part should be determined exclusively with respect to the characteristics of that specific contract.
Pri mešanih javnih naročilih, ki jih je mogoče ločiti, imajo naročniki vedno možnost, da za posamezne dele mešanega javnega naročila oddajo ločena javna naročila, v tem primeru pa bi morale biti določbe, ki bi se uporabljale za vsak posamezni del, določene izključno na podlagi značilnosti zadevnega naročila.
On the other hand, where contracting entities choose to include other elements in the procurement, whatever their value and whatever the legal regime the added elements would otherwise have been subject to, the main principle should be that, where a contract should be awarded pursuant to the provisions of this Directive, if awarded on its own, then this Directive should continue to apply to the entire mixed contract.
Če pa se naročniki odločijo v javno naročilo vključiti druge elemente – ne glede na njihovo vrednost in ne glede na pravno ureditev, ki bi sicer veljala za te dodane elemente – bi moralo biti vodilno načelo naslednje: v primeru, da bi bilo treba naročilo, če bi se oddalo samostojno, oddati na podlagi določb te direktive, bi se morala ta direktiva še naprej uporabljati za celotno mešano javno naročilo.
In such cases, non-application of this Directive should be possible provided that the award of a single contract is justified for objective reasons and that the decision to award a single contract is not taken for the purpose of excluding contracts from the application of this Directive or of Directive 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [8].
V takih primerih bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se ta direktiva ne uporablja, a pod pogojem, da oddajo enotnega javnega naročila upravičujejo objektivni razlogi in da odločitev o oddaji enotnega javnega naročila ni sprejeta z namenom izključitve naročil iz uporabe te direktive ali Direktive 2009/81/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8].
It should be clarified that contracting entities should not be prevented from choosing to apply this Directive to certain mixed contracts instead of applying Directive 2009/81/EC.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da naročnikom ne bi smeli onemogočiti, da za nekatera mešana javna naročila izberejo uporabo te direktive namesto Direktive 2009/81/ES.
Furthermore, contracts might be awarded for the purpose of meeting the requirements of several activities, possibly subject to different legal regimes.
Nadalje se javna naročila lahko oddajo za izpolnitev zahtev v zvezi z več dejavnostmi, za katere utegnejo veljati različne pravne ureditve.
It should be clarified that the legal regime applicable to a single contract intended to cover several activities should be subject to the rules applicable to the activity for which it is principally intended.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da bi morala biti pravna ureditev, ki se uporablja za enotno javno naročilo, ki naj bi zajemalo več dejavnosti, podrejena pravilom, ki se uporabljajo za dejavnost, za katero je javno naročilo pretežno namenjeno.
Determination of the activity for which the contract is principally intended can be based on an analysis of the requirements which the specific contract must meet, carried out by the contracting entity for the purposes of estimating the contract value and drawing up the procurement documents.
Določitev dejavnosti, za katero je javno naročilo pretežno namenjeno, lahko temelji na analizi zahtev, ki jih mora izpolnjevati določeno javno naročilo; to analizo izvede naročnik, zato da oceni vrednost javnega naročila in pripravi dokumentacijo v zvezi z oddajo javnega naročila.
In certain cases, such as the purchase of a single piece of equipment for the pursuit of activities for which information allowing an estimation of the respective rates of use would be unavailable, it might be objectively impossible to determine for which activity the contract is principally intended.
V določenih primerih, kot je nakup enega samega kosa opreme za opravljanje dejavnosti, v zvezi s katerimi informacije, ki bi omogočale ocenitev vsakokratne stopnje uporabe, niso na voljo, je lahko objektivno nemogoče določiti, za katero dejavnost je javno naročilo pretežno namenjeno.
To the extent this is necessary, for instance where joint and several liability is required, a specific form may be required when such groups are awarded the contract.
Če je to potrebno, na primer v primeru, ko se zahteva solidarna odgovornost, se določena oblika lahko zahteva ob oddaji javnega naročila takšnim skupinam.
It should also be clarified that contracting entities should be able to set out explicitly how groups of economic operators are to meet the criteria and requirements for qualification and qualitative selection set out in this Directive, which are required of economic operators participating on their own.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba tudi, da bi morali naročnikom omogočiti, da izrecno določijo, kako naj bi skupine gospodarskih subjektov izpolnile pogoje in zahteve v zvezi s priznanjem usposobljenosti in ugotavljanjem sposobnosti, določene v tej direktivi, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati gospodarski subjekti, ki sodelujejo samostojno.
To ensure a real opening up of the market and a fair balance in the application of procurement rules in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors it is necessary for the entities covered to be identified on a basis other than their legal status.
Za zagotovitev dejanskega odpiranja trga in pravičnega ravnotežja pri uporabi pravil o javnem naročanju v vodnem, energetskem in prometnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev je potrebno, da so vključeni naročniki opredeljeni na drug način kot s sklicevanjem na njihov pravni status.
It should be ensured, therefore, that the equal treatment of contracting entities operating in the public sector and those operating in the private sector is not prejudiced.
Zato bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da se ohrani enako obravnavanje naročnikov v javnem sektorju in tistih v zasebnem sektorju.
It is also necessary to ensure, in keeping with Article 345 TFEU, that the rules governing the system of property ownership in Member States are not prejudiced.
Prav tako je treba v skladu s členom 345 PDEU zagotoviti, da se ne posega v lastninskopravno ureditev v državah članicah.
The notion of special or exclusive rights is central to the definition of the scope of this Directive, since entities which are neither contracting authorities nor public undertakings within the meaning of this Directive are subject to its provisions only to the extent that they exercise one of the activities covered on the basis of such rights.
Pojem posebnih ali izključnih pravic je bistvenega pomena za opredelitev področja uporabe te direktive, saj za subjekte, ki v smislu te direktive niso javni naročniki niti javna podjetja, določbe te direktive veljajo le, kolikor na podlagi teh pravic opravljajo eno od dejavnosti, ki spada v področje njene uporabe.
It is therefore appropriate to clarify that rights which have been granted by means of a procedure based on objective criteria, in particular pursuant to Union legislation, and for which adequate publicity has been ensured do not constitute special or exclusive rights for the purposes of this Directive.
Zato je primerno pojasniti, da pravice, podeljene po postopku, ki temelji na objektivnih kriterijih, zlasti v skladu z zakonodajo Unije, in v katerem je bilo zagotovljeno ustrezno obveščanje javnosti, za namene te direktive ne predstavljajo posebnih ali izključnih pravic.
That legislation should include Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [9], Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [10], Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [11], Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [12] and Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council [13].It should also be clarified that that listing of legislation is not exhaustive and that rights in any form, including by way of acts of concession, which have been granted by means of other procedures based on objective criteria and for which adequate publicity has been ensured do not constitute special or exclusive rights for the purposes of defining the scope of this Directive ratione personae.
Ta zakonodaja bi morala vključevati Direktivo 2009/73/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne [9], Direktivo 2009/72/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [10], Direktivo 97/67/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11], Direktivo 94/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12] ter Uredbo (ES) št. 1370/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13].Prav tako bi bilo treba pojasniti, da ta seznam zakonodaje ni izčrpen in da pravice v kakršni koli obliki, tudi kot akti o koncesiji, podeljene po drugih postopkih, ki temeljijo na objektivnih kriterijih in v katerih je bilo zagotovljeno ustrezno obveščanje javnosti, ne pomenijo posebnih ali izključnih pravic za namene opredelitve področja uporabe te direktive, kar zadeva osebno veljavnost.