natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulation (EU) No 944/2013 establishes a new harmonised classification for the following substances: [pitch, coal tar, high-temp.] has been classified as carcinogenic 1A; gallium arsenide has been classified as carcinogenic 1B; [pitch, coal tar, high-temp.] has been classified as mutagenic 1B; [pitch, coal tar, high-temp.], epoxiconazole (ISO), nitrobenzene, dihexyl phthalate, N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone, ammoniumpentadecafluorooctanoate, perfluorooctanoic acid and 2-ethylhexyl 10-ethyl-4,4-dioctyl-7-oxo-8-oxa-3,5-dithia-4-stannatetradecanoate have been classified as reproductive toxicant 1B.
Uredba (EU) št. 944/2013 določa novo usklajeno razvrstitev za naslednje snovi: [smola, premogov katran, visoka temperatura] je razvrščena kot rakotvorna snov kategorije 1A; galijev arzenid je razvrščen kot rakotvorna snov kategorije 1B; [smola, premogov katran, visoka temperatura] je razvrščena kot mutagena snov kategorije 1B; [smola, premogov katran, visoka temperatura], epoksikonazol (ISO), nitrobenzen, diheksil ftalat, N-etil 2-pirolidon, amonijev pentadekafluorooktanoat, perfluorooktanojska kislina in 2-etilheksil 10-etil-4,4-dioktil-7-okso-8-oksa-3,5-ditia-4-stanatetradekanoat so razvrščeni kot snovi, strupene za razmnoževanje, kategorije 1B.
As operators may apply the harmonised classifications set out in Part 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 at an earlier date, they should be able to apply the provisions of this Regulation earlier, on a voluntary basis.
Izvajalci lahko usklajene razvrstitve iz dela 3 Priloge VI k Uredbi (ES) št. 1272/2008 začnejo uporabljati že prej, zato bi jim moralo biti omogočeno, da prostovoljno uporabljajo določbe iz te uredbe.
Appendices 1 to 6 to Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 should be amended accordingly.
Dodatke 1 do 6 k Prilogi XVII k Uredbi (ES) št. 1907/2006 bi bilo treba v skladu s tem spremeniti.
Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 is amended in accordance with Annexes I, II and III to this Regulation.
Priloga XVII k Uredbi (ES) št. 1907/2006 se spremeni v skladu s prilogami I, II in III k tej uredbi.
Annex I to this Regulation shall apply from 1 April 2014.
Priloga I k tej uredbi se začne uporabljati 1. aprila 2014.
Annex II to this Regulation shall apply from 1 January 2015.
Priloga II k tej uredbi se začne uporabljati 1. januarja 2015.
Annex III to this Regulation shall apply from 1 April 2016.
Priloga III k tej uredbi se začne uporabljati 1. aprila 2016.
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 353, 31.12.2008, p. 1).
Uredbo (ES) št. 1272/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2008 o razvrščanju, označevanju in pakiranju snovi ter zmesi, o spremembi in razveljavitvi direktiv 67/548/EGS in 1999/45/ES ter spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 (UL L 353, 31.12.2008, str. 1).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 618/2012 of 10 July 2012 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (OJ L 179, 11.7.2012, p. 3).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 618/2012 z dne 10. julija 2012 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1272/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razvrščanju, označevanju in pakiranju snovi ter zmesi z namenom njene prilagoditve tehničnemu in znanstvenemu napredku (UL L 179, 11.7.2012, str. 3).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 944/2013 of 2 October 2013 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (OJ L 261, 3.10.2013, p. 5).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 944/2013 z dne 2. oktobra 2013 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1272/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razvrščanju, označevanju in pakiranju snovi ter zmesi z namenom njene prilagoditve tehničnemu in znanstvenemu napredku (UL L 261, 3.10.2013, str. 5).
In Appendix 2, the following entry is inserted in the table in accordance with the order of the entries set out therein:
V Dodatku 2 se v preglednico v skladu z vrstnim redom vpisov v preglednici vstavi naslednji vpis:
In Appendix 6, the following entries are inserted in the table in accordance with the order of the entries set out therein:
V Dodatku 6 se v preglednico v skladu z vrstnim redom vpisov v preglednici vstavijo naslednji vpisi:
ert-butylbenzoic acid
erc-Butilbenzojska kislina
‘gallium arsenide
„galijev arzenid
N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidone; 1-ethylpyrrolidin-2-one
N-etil 2-pirolidon; 1-etilpirolidin-2-on
perfluorooctanoic acid
perfluorooktanojska kislina
In Appendix 1, the following entry is inserted in the table in accordance with the order of the entries set out therein:
V Dodatku 1 se v preglednico v skladu z vrstnim redom vpisov v preglednici vstavi naslednji vpis:
‘pitch, coal tar, high-temp.;
„smola, premogov katran, visoka temperatura;
(The residue from the distillation of high temperature coal tar. A black solid with an approximate softening point from 30 °C to 180 °C (86 °F to 356 °F). Composed primarily of a complex mixture of three or more membered condensed ring aromatic hydrocarbons.)
(Ostanek destilacije visokotemperaturnega premogovega katrana. Črna trdna snov z zmehčiščem od 30 °C do 180 °C (86 °F do 356 °F). Sestoji pretežno iz kompleksne zmesi tri- ali veččlenskih kondenziranih obročev aromatskih ogljikovodikov.)
In Appendix 2, the following entry is deleted:
V Dodatku 2 se črta naslednji vpis:
In Appendix 4, the following entry is inserted in the table in accordance with the order of the entries set out therein:
V Dodatku 4 se v preglednico v skladu z vrstnim redom vpisov v preglednici vstavi naslednji vpis:
In Appendix 6, the following entry is inserted in the table in accordance with the order of the entries set out therein:
V Dodatku 6 se v preglednico v skladu z vrstnim redom vpisov v preglednici vstavi naslednji vpis:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 318/2014
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 318/2014
amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for fenarimol, metaflumizone and teflubenzuron in or on certain products
o spremembi prilog II in III k Uredbi (ES) št. 396/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede mejnih vrednosti ostankov za fenarimol, metaflumizon in teflubenzuron v ali na nekaterih proizvodih
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC [1], and in particular Article 14(1)(a) and Article 49(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 396/2005 z dne 23. februarja 2005 o mejnih vrednostih ostankov pesticidov v ali na hrani in krmi rastlinskega in živalskega izvora ter o spremembi Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS [1], zlasti člena 14(1)(a) in člena 49(2) Uredbe,
For fenarimol maximum residue levels (MRLs) were set in Annex II and Part B of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
Mejne vrednosti ostankov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: MRL) za fenarimol so bile določene v Prilogi II in delu B Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 396/2005.
For metaflumizone and teflubenzuron MRLs were set in Part A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
MRL za metaflumizon in teflubenzuron so bile določene v delu A Priloge III k Uredbi (ES) št. 396/2005.
In the context of a procedure for the authorisation of the use of a plant protection product containing the active substance metaflumizone on cucurbits (edible peel), melons, watermelons, broccoli, cauliflower, Chinese cabbage, lettuce and other salad plants, herbs, beans (with pods), peas (with pods), globe artichokes and cotton seed, an application was made in accordance with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 for modification of the existing MRLs.
V okviru postopka za registracijo fitofarmacevtskega sredstva, ki vsebuje aktivno snov metaflumizon, je bila v skladu s členom 6(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 396/2005 vložena vloga za spremembo obstoječih MRL na bučnicah (z užitno lupino), melonah, lubenicah, brokoliju, cvetači, kitajskem kapusu, solati in drugih solatnicah, zeliščih, fižolu (s stroki), grahu (s stroki), artičokah in bombažnem semenu.
As regards teflubenzuron, such an application was made for crops belonging to the Solanaceae group and cucurbits (edible peel).
Za teflubenzuron je bila vložena taka vloga za kmetijske rastline iz družine Solanaceae in bučnice (z užitno lupino).
In accordance with Article 6(2) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 an application was submitted for fenarimol on apples, cherries, peaches, grapes strawberries, bananas, tomatoes, cucumbers, melons, pumpkins and watermelons.
V skladu s členom 6(2) in (4) Uredbe (ES) št. 396/2005 je bila vložena vloga za fenarimol na jabolkah, češnjah, hruškah, grozdju, jagodah, bananah, paradižniku, kumarah, melonah, orjaških bučah in lubenicah.
The applicant claims that the authorised uses of fenarimol on such crops in several third countries lead to residues exceeding the MRLs in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 and that higher MRLs are necessary to avoid trade barriers for the importation of these crops.
Vložnik trdi, da zaradi registriranih uporab fenarimola na takih kmetijskih rastlinah v številnih tretjih državah ostanki presegajo MRL, dovoljene na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 396/2005, in da so za preprečevanje trgovinskih ovir pri uvozu teh kmetijskih rastlin potrebne višje MRL.
The European Food Safety Authority, hereinafter 'the Authority' assessed the applications and the evaluation reports, examining in particular the risks to the consumer and, where relevant, to animals and gave reasoned opinions on the proposed MRLs [2].
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) je preučila vloge in poročila o ocenah, zlasti glede tveganj za potrošnike in po potrebi za živali, ter predložila obrazložena mnenja o predlaganih MRL [2].
The Authority concluded in its reasoned opinions that, as regards the use of fenarimol on peaches, grapes, strawberries, bananas, tomatoes and watermelons and the use of metaflumizone on melons, watermelons, herbs and salad plants (except lettuce), the submitted data are not sufficient to set new MRLs.
Agencija je v obrazloženih mnenjih ugotovila, da predloženi podatki ne zadostujejo za določitev novih MRL za fenarimol na hruškah, grozdju, jagodah, bananah, paradižniku in lubenicah ter za metaflumizon na melonah, lubenicah, zeliščih in solatnicah (razen solate).
As regards the use of metaflumizone on scarole, the Authority does not recommend setting the proposed MRL since a risk for consumers cannot be excluded.
Agencija ne priporoča določitve predlaganih MRL za metaflumizon na endiviji, saj tveganja za potrošnike ni mogoče izključiti.
As regards the use of metaflumizone on broccoli and lettuce, the Authority recommends setting lower MRLs than the ones proposed by the applicant.
Agencija priporoča določitev nižjih MRL za uporabo metaflumizona na brokoliju in solati od tistih, ki jih je predlagal vložnik.
As regards the use of teflubenzuron on Solanaceae crops and cucurbits (edible peel), the Authority identified chronic consumer intake concerns.
Agencija je v zvezi z uporabo teflubenzurona na rastlinah iz družine Solanaceae in bučnicah (z užitno lupino) ugotovila zaskrbljenost za potrošnike zaradi kroničnega vnosa.
However, the main contributor to the total exposure is apple.
Vendar pa glavni delež k skupni izpostavljenosti predstavljajo jabolka.
The Authority recommends lowering the MRL set for apples when increasing the MRLs for the above crops.
Agencija priporoča znižanje MRL za jabolka in zvišanje MRL za ostale rastline.
Since such MRL was set to accommodate an import tolerance request based on authorised uses in Brazil, the applicant has been contacted in order to avoid trade barriers.
Ker naj bi taka MRL ugodila zahtevi za toleranco pri uvozu zaradi registriranih uporab v Braziliji, je bil z vložnikom vzpostavljen stik, da se preprečijo trgovinske ovire.
The applicant proposed a fall-back MRL of 0,5 mg/kg, which is sufficient to accommodate the uses authorised in Brazil.
Vložnik je predlagal nadomestno MRL v višini 0,5 mg/kg, ki je dovolj velika za prilagoditev registriranim uporabam v Braziliji.
As a high level of consumer protection is maintained, it is appropriate to set that MRL to 0,5 mg/kg.
Ker se ohranja visoka raven varstva potrošnikov, je primerno navedeno MRL določiti v višini 0,5 mg/kg.
Neither the lifetime exposure to those substances via consumption of all food products that may contain them, nor the short-term exposure due to high consumption of the relevant crops and products showed that there is a risk that the acceptable daily intake (ADI) or the acute reference dose (ARfD) is exceeded.
Niti pri vseživljenjski izpostavljenosti navedenim snovem z uživanjem vseh živil, ki bi te snovi lahko vsebovala, niti pri kratkotrajni izpostavljenosti zaradi čezmernega uživanja zadevnih pridelkov ni bilo ugotovljeno tveganje, da se sprejemljivi dnevni vnos (ADI) ali akutni referenčni odmerek (ARfD) preseže.
A reasonable period should be allowed to elapse before the modified MRLs become applicable in order to permit Member States, third countries and food business operators to prepare themselves to meet the new requirements which will result from the modification of the MRLs.
Pred začetkom uporabe spremenjenih MRL bi bilo treba določiti primerno obdobje, v katerem se lahko države članice, tretje države in nosilci živilske dejavnosti pripravijo na izpolnjevanje novih zahtev zaradi spremembe MRL.
Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as it stood before being amended by this Regulation shall continue to apply to products which were lawfully produced before 17 October 2014.
Različica Uredbe (ES) št. 396/2005 pred spremembami s to uredbo se še naprej uporablja za proizvode, ki so bili zakonito proizvedeni pred 17 oktobra 2014.
It shall apply from 17 October 2014.
Uporablja se od 17 oktobra 2014.
EFSA scientific reports available online: http://www.efsa.europa.euReasoned opinion of EFSA on the modification of the existing MRLs for fenarimol in various crops.
Znanstvena poročila EFSA na voljo na spletu: http://www.efsa.europa.euObrazloženo mnenje o spremembi obstoječih MRL za fenarimol v različnih kmetijskih rastlinah.
EFSA Journal 2011; 9(9):2350 [32 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2350.Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for metaflumizone in various commodities.
EFSA Journal 2011; 9(9):2350 [str. 32]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2350.Obrazloženo mnenje o spremembi obstoječih MRL za metaflumizon v različnih proizvodih.
EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7):3316 [50 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3316.Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for teflubenzuron in various fruiting vegetables.
EFSA Journal 2013; 11(7):3316 [ str. 50]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3316.Obrazloženo mnenje o spremembi obstoječih MRL za teflubenzuron v različni plodovkah.
EFSA Journal 2012; 10(3):2633 [27 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2633.
EFSA Journal 2012; 10(3):2633 [str. 27]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2633.
In Annex II, the column for fenarimol is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi II se stolpec za fenarimol nadomesti z naslednjim:
In Part A, the columns for metaflumizone and teflubenzuron are replaced by the following:
V delu A se stolpca za metaflumizon in teflubenzuron nadomestita z naslednjim:
In Part B, the column for fenarimol is replaced by the following:
V delu B se stolpec za fenarimol nadomesti z naslednjim:
Pesticide-code combination for which the MRL as set in Annex III Part B applies.’
Kombinacija pesticid-oznaka, za katero velja MRL, kakor je določeno v delu B Priloge III.“
Commission Regulation (EU) No 319/2014
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 319/2014
on the fees and charges levied by the European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 593/2007
o taksah in pristojbinah, ki jih zaračunava Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu, in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 593/2007
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC [1], in particular Article 64(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. februarja 2008 o skupnih predpisih na področju civilnega letalstva in ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 91/670/EGS, Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 in Direktive 2004/36/ES [1] ter zlasti člena 64(1) Uredbe,
The revenues of the European Aviation Safety Agency (hereinafter ‘the Agency’), consist of a contribution from the Union and from any European third country which has entered into the agreements referred to in Article 66 of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, of the fees paid by applicants for certificates and approvals issued, maintained or amended by the Agency, and of charges for publications, handling of appeals, training and any other service provided by the Agency.
Prihodki Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) izhajajo iz prispevka Unije in katere koli evropske tretje države, s katero je Skupnost sklenila sporazume iz člena 66 Uredbe (ES) št. 216/2008, iz taks, ki jih za certifikate vplačajo vlagatelji, in potrdil, ki jih Agencija izda, ohrani ali spremeni, ter iz dajatev za objave, obravnavanje pritožb, usposabljanje in druge storitve, ki jih zagotavlja Agencija.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 593/2007 [2] established the fees and charges to be levied by the Agency.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 593/2007 [2] je določila takse in dajatve, ki jih zaračunava Agencija.
However, the tariffs need to be adjusted in order to ensure a balance between the costs incurred by the Agency for related certification tasks and services provided, and the revenues to cover said costs.
Vendar je treba tarife prilagoditi, da se zagotovi ravnovesje med stroški Agencije za izvajanje postopkov certificiranja in zagotavljanje storitev ter prihodki za kritje teh stroškov.
Fees and charges provided for in this Regulation should be set in a transparent, fair and uniform manner.
Takse in pristojbine, predvidene s to uredbo, bi morale biti določene pregledno, pravično in enotno.
The fees levied by the Agency should not jeopardize the competitiveness of the European industries concerned.
Takse, ki jih zaračunava Agencija, ne bi smele ogrožati konkurenčnosti zadevnih evropskih industrij.
Furthermore, they should be established on a basis which takes due account of the ability of small undertakings to pay.
Temeljiti bi morale na osnovi, ki upošteva plačilno sposobnost majhnih podjetij.
While civil aviation safety should be the prime concern, the Agency should nevertheless take full account of cost efficiency when conducting the tasks incumbent on it.
Varnost v civilnem letalstvu bi morala biti primarna skrb, Agencija pa bi morala pri opravljanju nalog, za katere je zadolžena, vseeno v celoti upoštevati stroškovno učinkovitost.
The geographical location of the undertakings in the territories of the Member States should not be a discriminatory factor.
Geografski položaj podjetij na ozemljih držav članic ne bi smel biti diskriminatorni faktor.
Consequently, the travel costs related to the certification tasks carried out on behalf of such undertakings should be aggregated and divided between the applicants.
Zato bi bilo treba potne stroške, povezane s certifikacijskimi nalogami, ki se opravljajo v imenu takšnih podjetij, zbrati in razdeliti med vlagatelje.
This Regulation foresees the possibility for the Agency to charge fees for certification tasks which are not mentioned in the Annex to this Regulation, but which fall within the remits of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008.
Ta uredba predvideva možnost, da Agencija zaračunava takse za certifikacijske naloge, ki niso navedene v Prilogi k tej uredbi, vendar spadajo na področje, ki ga ureja Uredba (ES) št. 216/2008.
The applicant should have the choice to request a financial quote of the estimated amount to be paid for the certification task or service.
Vlagatelj bi moral imeti možnost zahtevati predračun ocenjenega zneska, ki ga je treba plačati za certifikacijsko nalogo ali zagotovljeno storitev.
The criteria for determining the amount to be paid should be clear, uniform and public.
Merila za določitev zneska bi morala biti jasna, enotna in javna.
Where it is not possible to accurately determine this amount in advance, transparent principles for assessing the amount to be paid during the provision of the certification task or service should be established by the Agency.
Kadar tega zneska vnaprej ni mogoče natančno določiti, bi morala Agencija določiti pregledna načela za oceno zneska, ki ga je treba plačati za izvedbo certifikacijske naloge ali za storitev.
Deadlines for the payment of fees and charges levied under this Regulation should be fixed.
Določiti bi bilo treba roke za plačilo taks in pristojbin, ki se zaračunavajo v skladu s to uredbo.
Appropriate remedies in cases of non-payment should be laid down such as the termination of the related application processes, invalidation of related approvals, prevention of any further provision of certification tasks or services to the same applicant, and recovery of the outstanding amount through available means.
V primeru neplačila bi bilo treba določiti ustrezna pravna sredstva, na primer zaustavitev ustreznih procesov predložitve vloge, razveljavitev ustreznih odobritev, preprečitev nadaljnjega opravljanja certifikacijske naloge in storitev za istega vlagatelja ter izterjava neporavnanega zneska z razpoložljivimi sredstvi.
The industry should enjoy good financial visibility and be able to anticipate the cost of the fees and charges it will be required to pay.
Industriji bi bilo treba omogočiti dober finančen pregled in možnost vnaprejšnjega izračuna zneska taks in pristojbin, ki ga bo morala plačati.
At the same time, it is necessary to ensure a balance between overall expenditure incurred by the Agency in carrying out certification tasks and services provided, and overall income from the fees and charges it levies.
Istočasno je treba zagotavljati ravnotežje med celotnim stroškom, ki ga ima Agencija z vodenjem certifikacijskih nalog in zagotavljanjem storitev, in skupno vsoto taks in pristojbin, ki jih zaračuna.
In accordance with provisions of the Framework Financial Regulation [3], fees and charges should be set at the level such to avoid a deficit or a significant accumulation of surplus.
V skladu z določbami okvirne finančne uredbe [3] bi bilo treba določiti takšno višino taks in pristojbin, da se prepreči primanjkljaj ali znatno kopičenje presežka.
It should therefore be mandatory to review the levels of fees and charges if a significant deficit or surplus becomes recurrent on the basis of the Agency’s financial results and forecasts.
Zato bi morala biti revizija višine taks in pristojbin obvezna, če se na osnovi finančnih rezultatov in napovedi Agencije znaten primanjkljaj ali presežek ponavlja.
Interested parties should be consulted prior to any change of fees.
Pred vsako spremembo taks bi se bilo treba posvetovati z zainteresiranimi stranmi.
Moreover, the Agency should regularly provide interested parties with information on how and on what basis the fees are calculated.
Poleg tega bi morala Agencija zainteresiranim stranem redno zagotavljati informacije o načinu izračuna taks in podlagi za izračun.
Such information should provide interested parties with an insight into the costs incurred by the Agency and its productivity.
Te informacije bi morale zainteresiranim stranem zagotoviti vpogled v stroške in storilnost Agencije.