natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC, 79/267/EEC, 92/49/EEC, 92/96/EEC, 93/6/EEC and 93/22/EEC, and Directives 98/78/EC and 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 35, 11.2.2003, p.
Kakor je objavljen na spletni strani ECB.
1).
Uredba (ES) št. 1606/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. julija 2002 o uporabi mednarodnih računovodskih standardov (UL L 243, 11.9.2002, str.
As published on the ECB’s website.
1).
Regulation (EU) No 469/2014 of the European Central Bank
Uredba (EU) št. 469/2014 Evropske centralne banke
amending Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 on the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions (ECB/1999/4)
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 2157/1999 o pooblastilih Evropske centralne banke za nalaganje sankcij (ECB/1999/4)
THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 132(3) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 132(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Statuta Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke ter zlasti členov 34.3 in 19.1 Statuta,
Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Articles 34.3 and 19.1 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2532/98 z dne 23. novembra 1998 o pooblastilih Evropske centralne banke za nalaganje sankcij [1] in zlasti člena 6(2) Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 of 23 November 1998 concerning the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions [1], and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
Whereas:
Evropska centralna banka (ECB) uporablja Uredbo (ES) št. 2157/1999 Evropske centralne banke (ECB/1999/4) [2] pri nalaganju sankcij na raznih področjih v svoji pristojnosti, vključno z izvajanjem denarne politike Unije, upravljanjem plačilnih sistemov in zbiranjem statističnih informacij.
The European Central Bank (ECB) has applied Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 of the European Central Bank (ECB/1999/4) [2] to impose sanctions in its various fields of competence, including in particular the implementation of the monetary policy of the Union, the operation of payment systems and the collection of statistical information.
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1024/2013 [3] pooblašča ECB, da naloži kreditnim institucijam, ki jih nadzira, upravne denarne kazni, kadar te institucije kršijo zahteve iz prava Unije, ki se neposredno uporablja, in sankcije v primeru kršitev uredb ali sklepov ECB.
Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 [3] entitles the ECB to impose on the credit institutions it supervises administrative pecuniary penalties when these institutions breach a requirement under directly applicable Union law and sanctions in case of a breach of ECB regulations or decisions.
ECB je sprejela Uredbo (EU) št.
The ECB has adopted Regulation (EU) No YYY/2014 (ECB/2014/17) [4] to further specify the procedures governing the exercise by the ECB, national competent authorities and national designated authorities of their supervisory tasks under Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013.
YYY/2014 Evropske centralne banke (ECB/2014/17) [4], s katero podrobneje ureja postopke, s katerimi ECB, pristojni nacionalni organi in imenovani nacionalni organi izvajajo svoje nadzorne naloge po Uredbi (EU) št. 1024/2013.
Regulation (EU) No YYY/2014 (ECB/2014/17) contains provisions on the procedure for the imposition of administrative penalties by the ECB and national competent authorities in the supervisory field.
Uredba (EU) št.
In order to establish a consistent regime for the imposition of sanctions by the ECB in the exercise of its supervisory tasks under Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 and Regulation (EU) No YYY/2014 (ECB/2014/17), the ECB has adopted Recommendation ECB/2014/19 [5].
YYY/2014 (ECB/2014/17) vsebuje določbe o postopku, po katerem ECB in pristojni nacionalni organi nalagajo upravne kazni na področju nadzora.
Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 should be clarified to the effect that it only applies to the imposition of sanctions by the ECB in the exercise of its non-supervisory central bank tasks, while Regulation (EU) No YYY/2014 (ECB/2014/17) applies to the imposition of administrative penalties by the ECB in the exercise of its supervisory tasks.
Da bi se vzpostavila usklajena ureditev, po kateri ECB nalaga sankcije pri izvajanju nadzorniških nalog po Uredbi (EU) št. 1024/2013 in Uredbi (EU) št.
When further specifying the procedural rules applying to the initiation and conduct of the infringement procedure laid down in Regulation (EC) No 2532/98, the ECB should take into account the degree of severity of the envisaged sanction.
YYY/2014 (ECB/2014/17), je ECB sprejela Priporočilo ECB/2014/19 [5].
Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 should be amended accordingly,
V Uredbi (ES) št. 2157/1999 bi bilo treba pojasniti, da se uporablja samo takrat, kadar ECB nalaga sankcije pri izvajanju centralnobančnih nalog, ki niso povezane z nadzorom, medtem ko se Uredba (EU) št.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
YYY/2014 (ECB/2014/17) uporablja takrat, kadar ECB nalaga upravne kazni pri izvajanju nadzorniških nalog.
Article 1
ECB bi morala pri natančnejši opredelitvi postopkovnih pravil za uvedbo in izvajanje postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2532/98 upoštevati stopnjo resnosti predvidene sankcije.
Amendments
Zato je treba Uredbo (ES) št. 2157/1999 ustrezno spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 is amended as follows:
SPREJEL NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
a new Article 1a is inserted after Article 1:
Člen 1
‘Article 1a
Spremembe
Scope
Uredba (ES) št. 2157/1999 se spremeni:
This Regulation shall only apply to sanctions that may be imposed by the ECB in the exercise of its non-supervisory central bank tasks.
za členom 1 se vstavi nov člen 1a:
It shall not apply to any administrative penalties that may be imposed by the ECB in the exercise of its supervisory tasks.’;
„Člen 1a
a new Article 1b is inserted after Article 1a:
Področje uporabe
‘Article 1b
Ta uredba se uporablja samo za sankcije, ki jih ECB lahko naloži pri izvajanju centralnobančnih nalog, ki niso povezane z nadzorom.
Independent investigating unit
Ne uporablja se za upravne kazni, ki jih ECB lahko naloži pri izvajanju nadzorniških nalog.“;
For the purposes of deciding whether to initiate an infringement procedure pursuant to Article 2 and exercise the powers laid down in Article 3, the ECB shall establish an internal independent investigating unit (hereinafter “investigating unit”) composed of investigating officers who shall perform their investigative functions independently from the Executive Board and the Governing Council, and shall not take part in the deliberations of the Executive Board and Governing Council.
za členom 1a se vstavi nov člen 1b:
Where the ECB considers that there is a reason to suspect that one or more infringements are being or have been committed, the matter shall be referred to the Executive Board.
„Člen 1b
Where the Executive Board considers that the applicable sanction could exceed the threshold provided for in Article 10(1), the simplified procedure set out in Article 10 shall not apply and the Executive Board shall refer the matter to the investigating unit.
Neodvisna preiskovalna enota
The investigating unit shall take a decision on whether or not to initiate an infringement procedure.
Za potrebe odločanja, ali je treba uvesti postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev v skladu s členom 2, in izvajanja pooblastil, določenih v členu 3, ECB ustanovi interno neodvisno preiskovalno enoto (v nadaljnjem besedilu: preiskovalna enota), ki jo sestavljajo preiskovalni uradniki, ki opravljajo svoje preiskovalne naloge neodvisno od Izvršilnega odbora in Sveta ECB ter ne sodelujejo v razpravah Izvršilnega odbora in Sveta ECB.
Any reference to the ECB in Articles 2 to 4, Article 5(1) to (3) and Article 6 shall be read as a reference to the investigating unit of the ECB or, where the simplified procedure under Article 10 applies, to the Executive Board.
Če ECB meni, da obstaja razlog za sum, da je bila storjena ena ali več kršitev, zadevo obravnava Izvršilni odbor.
The provisions of this Article shall be without prejudice to the competence of the competent national central bank to initiate an infringement procedure and conduct an inquiry in accordance with this Regulation.’;
Če Izvršilni odbor meni, da bi ustrezna sankcija lahko presegla prag, določen v členu 10(1), se ne uporabi poenostavljeni postopek iz člena 10, ampak Izvršilni odbor zadevo odstopi preiskovalni enoti.
in Article 2, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:
Preiskovalna enota se odloči, ali bo uvedla postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev ali ne.
No more than one infringement procedure shall be initiated against the same undertaking based on the same facts.
Sklicevanja na ECB v členih 2 do 4, členu 5(1) do (3) in členu 6 se razumejo kot sklicevanja na preiskovalno enoto v ECB ali, kadar se uporabi poenostavljeni postopek po členu 10, na Izvršilni odbor.
For this purpose, no decision on whether or not to initiate an infringement procedure shall be taken by the ECB or by the competent national central bank until they have informed and consulted with one another.’;
Določbe tega člena ne posegajo v pristojnost pristojne nacionalne centralne banke, da uvede postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev in izvaja preiskave v skladu s to uredbo.“;
in Article 2, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
v členu 2 se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Either the ECB or the competent national central bank, as the case may be, shall, upon request, be entitled to assist and cooperate with the other in carrying out the infringement procedure, in particular by transmitting any information that may be deemed relevant.’;
Na osnovi istih dejstev se proti istemu podjetju ne sme uvesti več kot en postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev.
a new Article 7a is inserted after Article 7:
Zato ECB ali pristojna nacionalna centralna banka ne smeta sprejeti nobenih odločitev o uvedbi postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev, dokler se medsebojno ne obvestita in posvetujeta.“;
‘Article 7a
v členu 2 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Submission of a proposal to the Executive Board
ECB ali pristojna nacionalna centralna banka sta na zahtevo upravičeni, da si medsebojno pomagata in sodelujeta pri izvajanju postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev, zlasti s posredovanjem informacij, za katere menita, da so koristne.“;
If the investigating unit or the competent national central bank, as relevant, considers, after completion of the infringement procedure, that a sanction should be imposed on the undertaking concerned, it shall submit a proposal to the Executive Board determining that the undertaking concerned has committed an infringement and specifying the amount of the sanction to be imposed.
za členom 7 se vstavi nov člen 7a:
The investigating unit or the competent national central bank, as relevant, shall base its proposal only on facts and objections on which the undertaking concerned has had the opportunity to comment.
„Člen 7a
If the Executive Board considers that the file submitted by the investigating unit or the competent national central bank, as relevant, is incomplete, it may return the file, together with a reasoned request for additional information, to the investigating unit or the competent national central bank.
Vložitev predloga Izvršilnemu odboru
If the Executive Board, on the basis of a complete file, agrees with the proposal of the investigating unit or the competent national central bank, as relevant, to impose a sanction on the undertaking concerned, it shall adopt a decision in accordance with the proposal submitted by the investigating unit or competent national central bank.
Če preiskovalna enota oziroma pristojna nacionalna centralna banka po zaključka postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev menita, da bi morala biti zadevnemu podjetju naložena sankcija, vložita predlog Izvršilnemu odboru, v katerem navedeta, da je zadevno podjetje storilo kršitev, in določita znesek sankcije, ki naj se mu naloži.
If the Executive Board, on the basis of a complete file, considers that the facts described in the proposal of the investigating unit or the competent national central bank, as relevant, do not appear to constitute sufficient evidence of an infringement, the Executive Board may adopt a decision closing the case.
Preiskovalna enota oziroma pristojna nacionalna centralna banka utemeljita svoj predlog samo z dejstvi in očitki, o katerih se je zadevno podjetje imelo možnost izjaviti.
If the Executive Board, on the basis of a complete file, agrees that the undertaking concerned has committed an infringement, as determined in the proposal of the investigating unit or the competent national central bank, as relevant, but disagrees with the proposed sanction, it shall adopt a decision specifying the sanction that it considers appropriate.
Če Izvršilni odbor meni, da je spis, ki sta ga predložili preiskovalna enota oziroma pristojna nacionalna centralna banka, nepopoln, jima ga lahko vrne skupaj z obrazloženo zahtevo za dodatne informacije.
If the Executive Board, on the basis of a complete file, does not agree with the proposal of the investigating unit or the competent national central bank, as relevant, but concludes that a different infringement has been committed by the undertaking concerned, or that there is a different factual basis for the proposal of the investigating unit or the competent national central bank, as relevant, it shall inform the undertaking concerned in writing of its findings and of the objections raised against the undertaking concerned.
Če se Izvršilni odbor na podlagi popolnega spisa strinja s predlogom preiskovalne enote oziroma pristojne nacionalne centralne banke, da se zadevnemu podjetju naloži sankcija, sprejme odločitev v skladu s tem predlogom.
The Executive Board shall adopt a decision determining whether or not the undertaking concerned has committed an infringement and specifying the sanction to be imposed, if any.
Če Izvršilni odbor na podlagi popolnega spisa meni, da dejstva, opisana v predlogu preiskovalne enote oziroma pristojne nacionalne centralne banke, ne predstavljajo zadostnih dokazov za kršitev, lahko sprejme odločitev, s katero primer zaključi.
Decisions adopted by the Executive Board shall be based only on facts and objections on which the undertaking concerned has had the opportunity to comment.’.
Če se Izvršilni odbor na podlagi popolnega spisa strinja s tem, da je zadevno podjetje storilo kršitev, kot je navedeno v predlogu preiskovalne enote oziroma pristojne nacionalne centralne banke, ne strinja pa se s predlagano sankcijo, sprejme odločitev, v kateri navede, kakšna sankcija je po njegovem mnenju ustrezna.
Article 2
Če se Izvršilni odbor na podlagi popolnega spisa ne strinja s predlogom preiskovalne enote oziroma pristojne nacionalne centralne banke, ampak zaključi, da je zadevno podjetje storilo drugačno kršitev ali da obstaja drugačno dejansko stanje za predlog preiskovalne enote oziroma pristojne nacionalne centralne banke, o svojih ugotovitvah in očitkih zoper zadevno podjetje pisno obvesti zadevno podjetje.
Final provisions
Izvršilni odbor sprejme odločitev, v kateri navede, ali je zadevno podjetje storilo kršitev, in določi sankcijo, če jo je treba naložiti.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Odločitve, ki jih sprejme Izvršilni odbor, temeljijo samo na dejstvih in očitkih, o katerih se je imelo zadevno podjetje možnost izjaviti.“
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.
Člen 2
Done at Frankfurt am Main, .
Končni določbi
For the Governing Council of the ECB
Ta uredba začne veljati naslednji dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The President of the ECB
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah v skladu s Pogodbama.
OJ L 318, 27.11.1998, p.
V Frankfurtu na Majni,
4.
Za Svet ECB
Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 of the European Central Bank of 23 September 1999 on the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions (ECB/1999/4) (OJ L 264, 12.10.1999, p.
Predsednik ECB
21).
UL L 318, 27.11.1998, str.
Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, p.
4.
63).
Uredba Evropske centralne banke (ES) št. 2157/1999 z dne 23. septembra 1999 o pooblastilih Evropske centralne banke za nalaganje sankcij (ECB/1999/4) (UL L 264, 12.10.1999, str.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 470/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 470/2014
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of solar glass originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz solarnega stekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1], and in particular Article 9(4) and 14(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], in zlasti člena 9(4) in člena 14(1) Uredbe,
On 28 November 2013, the European Commission (the Commission) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of solar glass from the People’s Republic of China by Regulation (EU) No 1205/2013 (the provisional Regulation) [2].
Evropska komisija (Komisija) je 28. novembra 2013 z Uredbo (EU) št. 1205/2013 (začasna uredba) [2] uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz solarnega stekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The proceeding was initiated on 28 February 2013 following a complaint lodged on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of solar glass [3].
Postopek se je začel 28. februarja 2013 na podlagi pritožbe, vložene v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje solarnega stekla [3] v Uniji.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2012 (‘the investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2012 do 31. decembra 2012 (obdobje preiskave ali OP).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2009 to the end of the investigation period (the period considered).
Proučevanje gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do konca obdobja preiskave (obravnavano obdobje).
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which a provisional anti-dumping duty was imposed (the provisional disclosure), several interested parties made written submissions making known their views on the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila uvedena začasna protidampinška dajatev (začasno razkritje), je več zainteresiranih strani predložilo pisna stališča v zvezi z začasnimi ugotovitvami.
The parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard.
Zaslišanje je bilo odobreno vsem stranem, ki so to zahtevale.
Subsequently, the Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solar glass originating in the People’s Republic of China (the PRC) and definitively collect the amounts secured by way of provisional duty (the definitive disclosure).
Nato je Komisija vse strani obvestila o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameravala uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz solarnega stekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (LRK) ter dokončno pobrati zneske, zavarovane z začasno dajatvijo (dokončno razkritje).
The comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane strani, so bile obravnavane in, kadar je bilo primerno, upoštevane.
One exporting producer claimed that the total number of Union producers was not clearly presented in recitals 7, 11 and 75 of the provisional Regulation.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da skupno število proizvajalcev Unije v uvodnih izjavah 7, 11 in 75 začasne uredbe ni bilo jasno navedeno.
In this respect, the Commission hereby confirms that there were eight Union producers which came forward and were active during the IP.
Komisija v zvezi s tem potrjuje, da se je javilo osem proizvajalcev Unije, ki so bili dejavni v obdobju preiskave.
The identity of all but one Union producer had been withheld.
Identiteta vseh proizvajalcev Unije razen enega je bila prikrita.
In its reply to the general disclosure document, the complainant named three Union producers that had gone out of business (Guardian, AGC and Centrosolar Glass), and a fourth company that significantly reduced production (Saint Gobain).
Pritožnik je v svojem odgovoru na splošni dokument o razkritju imenoval tri proizvajalce Unije, ki so prenehali s poslovanjem (družbe Guardian, AGC in Centrosolar Glass), in četrto družbo, ki je znatno zmanjšala proizvodnjo (družbo Saint Gobain).
In the absence of other comments concerning the method of sampling of exporting producers in the PRC and of Union producers, the provisional findings in recitals 7 to 24 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z metodo vzorčenja proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in proizvajalcev Unije, se začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 7 do 24 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
After the adoption of the provisional Regulation, a verification visit was carried out at the premises of a second cooperating user, namely Viessmann Faulquemont SAS, France.
Po sprejetju začasne uredbe je bil v prostorih drugega sodelujočega uporabnika, družbe Viessmann Faulquemont SAS iz Francije, opravljen preveritveni obisk.
Procedural rights
Procesne pravice
One exporting producer claimed that the provisional disclosure provided to it was inadequate, in particular with regard to dumping, undercutting and injury margin calculations.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je bilo začasno razkritje, ki ga je prejel, neustrezno, zlasti v zvezi z izračuni dampinga, nelojalnega nižanja cen in škode.
In the absence of an adequate disclosure it was deprived of its fundamental rights of defence, guaranteed by Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (the basic Regulation), the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement as well as the European Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Zaradi neustreznega razkritja so bile kršene njegove pravice do obrambe, ki jih zagotavljajo Uredba (ES) št. 1225/2009 (osnovna uredba), protidampinški sporazum STO in Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
Regarding the calculation of the dumping margin the exporting producer claimed that no details were provided in the provisional disclosure in relation to the amount of adjustment applied on the cost of coating and the cost of the float production process (see recital 64 of the provisional Regulation) or the percentage of selling, general and administrative costs and profit.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je glede izračuna stopnje dampinga trdil, da v začasnem razkritju ni bilo nobenih podrobnosti v zvezi z zneskom prilagoditve za stroške premazov in stroške proizvodnega procesa s plavajočo talino (glej uvodno izjavo 64 začasne uredbe) ali odstotkom prodajnih, splošnih in upravnih stroškov ter dobička.
This claim was accepted and the Commission disclosed additional information.
Ta trditev je bila sprejeta in Komisija je razkrila dodatne informacije.
Where exact data could not be provided due to confidentiality reasons, ranges were disclosed.
Kadar zaradi zaupnosti ni bilo mogoče navesti natančnih podatkov, so bili podatki razkriti v obliki razponov.