natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in Appendix 5, the following row shall be inserted in the table:
KORELACIJSKA TABELA
Mobile crane of category N 3
Direktiva 70/157/EGS
Part B
Ta uredba
Item 1 in the table in Part I shall be deleted;
Člen 4(1) in (2)
Item 1 in Table 1 of Appendix 1 to Part I shall be deleted;
Člen 2a
Item 1 in Table 2 of Appendix 1 to Part I shall be deleted;
Člen 4(3) in (4)
Item 1 of the table in Part II shall be deleted.
Priloga I, točka 1
In Annex VI, in the table in the Appendix to Model A, Item 1 shall be deleted.
Priloga I, točka 3
Item 1 in the table in Appendix 1 shall be deleted;
Priloga I, točka 2
Item 1 in the table in Appendix 2 shall be deleted;
Priloga I, točka 4
Item 1 in the table in Appendix 3 shall be deleted;
Priloga I, točka 5
Item 1 in the table in Appendix 4 shall be deleted;
Priloga I, točka 6
Item 1 in the table in Appendix 5 shall be deleted.
Priloga I, Dodatek 1
ANNEX XII
Priloga I, Dodatek 2
CORRELATION TABLE
Priloga II, točke 1, 2, 3 in 4
Directive 70/157/EEC
Priloga IX, točke 1, 2, 3 in 4
This Regulation
Priloga II, točki 5 in 6
Article 4(1) and (2)
Priloga IX, točki 7 in 8
Article 2a
Priloga II, Dodatek 1
Article 4(3) and (4)
Priloga IX, Dodatek 1
Annex I, point 1
Priloga II, Dodatek 2
Annex I, point 3
Priloga IX, Dodatek 2
Annex I, point 2
Priloga II, Dodatek 3
Annex I, point 4
Priloga IX, Dodatek 3
Annex I, point 5
Nova metoda bi morala temeljiti na preskusni metodi, ki jo je leta 2007 objavila delovna skupina UN/ECE za hrup (GRB) in je vključevala različico standarda ISO 362 iz leta 2007.
Annex I, point 6
Rezultati spremljanja stare in nove preskusne metode so bili predloženi Komisiji.
Annex I, Appendix 1
V šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti [11] je bil določen okvir za oblikovanje okoljske politike v Uniji za obdobje 2002–2012.
Annex I, Appendix 2
Ta program je pozval k sprejetju ukrepov na področju obremenitve s hrupom za znatno zmanjšanje števila ljudi, ki so redno in dolgoročno prizadeti zaradi povprečnih stopenj hrupa, zlasti zaradi prometa.
Annex II, points 1, 2, 3 and 4
Komisija izvede in objavi podrobno študijo o mejnih vrednostih hrupa do 1. julija 2021.
Annex IX, points 1, 2, 3 and 4
Študija temelji na izpolnjevanju najnovejših regulativnih zahtev za vozila.
Annex II, points 5 and 6
Tehnična služba, ki je pristojna za preskuse, za vozilo, ki predstavlja tip vozila, izbere vozilo, ki je sprejemljivo za homologacijski organ.
Annex IX, points 7 and 8
Za lažje odločanje v postopku izbora se lahko uporabijo virtualne preskusne metode.
Annex II, Appendix 1
k = (a wot ref – a wot (i+1))/(a wot (i) – a wot (i+1));
Annex IX, Appendix 1
Lcrs rep = Lcrs(i+1) + k * (Lcrs (i) – Lcrs (i+1)),
Annex II, Appendix 2
in;n
Annex IX, Appendix 2
LASEP_k,j = Lanchor_k + (Naklonk – Y) * (nBB_k,j – nanchor,k)/1000
Annex II, Appendix 3
LASEP_k,j = Lanchor_k + (Naklonk + Y) * (nBB_k,j – nanchor,k)/1000
The new method should be based on the test method published by the UNECE Working Party on Noise (GRB) in 2007 which incorporated a 2007 version of the standard ISO 362.
M1 ≤ 2500 (1)kg
The results of monitoring of both the old and the new test methods were submitted to the Commission.
M1 > 2500 (1)kg
That programme called for actions in the field of noise pollution to substantially reduce the number of people regularly affected by long-term average levels of noise, particularly from traffic.
Na začetku in na koncu vsakega sklopa meritev se celoten sistem za zvočne meritve preveri s kalibratorjem zvoka, ki izpolnjuje zahteve za kalibratorje zvoka z natančnostjo razreda 1 v skladu s publikacijo IEC 60942: 2003 Brez dodatnih nastavitev je razlika med odčitki enaka ali manjša od 0,5 dB.
Regulation (EU) No 542/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 542/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 as regards the rules to be applied with respect to the Unified Patent Court and the Benelux Court of Justice
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012 glede pravil, ki se uporabljajo v zvezi z Enotnim sodiščem za patente in Sodiščem Beneluksa
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular points (a), (c) and (e) of Article 81(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti točk (a), (c) in (e) člena 81(2) Pogodbe,
On 19 February 2013, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Estonia, Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg, Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Portuguese Republic, Romania, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland signed the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court [3] (the ‘UPC Agreement’).
Kraljevina Belgija, Republika Bolgarija, Češka republika, Kraljevina Danska, Zvezna Republika Nemčija, Republika Estonija, Irska, Helenska republika, Francoska republika, Italijanska republika, Republika Ciper, Republika Latvija, Republika Litva, Veliko vojvodstvo Luksemburg, Madžarska, Republika Malta, Kraljevina Nizozemska, Republika Avstrija, Portugalska republika, Romunija, Republika Slovenija, Slovaška republika, Republika Finska, Kraljevina Švedska ter Združeno Kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska so 19. februarja 2013 podpisali Sporazum o enotnem sodišču za patente [3] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum o ESP).
The UPC Agreement provides for its entry into force not prior to the first day of the fourth month after the date of entry into force of the amendments to Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4] concerning the relationship of that Regulation with the UPC Agreement.
Sporazum o ESP določa, da ne začne veljati pred prvim dnem četrtega meseca po začetku veljavnosti sprememb Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4], ki se nanašajo na razmerje navedene uredbe s Sporazumom o ESP.
On 15 October 2012, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg and the Kingdom of the Netherlands, parties to the Treaty of 31 March 1965 concerning the establishment and statute of a Benelux Court of Justice (the ‘Benelux Court of Justice Treaty’), signed a Protocol amending that Treaty.
Kraljevina Belgija, Veliko vojvodstvo Luksemburg in Kraljevina Nizozemska, pogodbenice Pogodbe z dne 31. marca 1965 o ustanovitvi in statutu Sodišča Beneluksa (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Pogodba o Sodišču Beneluksa), so 15. oktobra 2012 podpisale Protokol o spremembi navedene pogodbe.
That Protocol made it possible to transfer jurisdiction to the Benelux Court of Justice in specific matters falling within the scope of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012.
Z navedenim protokolom se je lahko na Sodišče Beneluksa prenesla pristojnost v določenih zadevah, ki spadajo na področje uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012.
It is necessary to regulate the relationship of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 with the UPC Agreement and with the Benelux Court of Justice Treaty by way of amendments to that Regulation.
Treba je urediti razmerje med Uredbo (EU) št. 1215/2012 ter Sporazumom o ESP in Pogodbo o Sodišču Beneluksa, in sicer s spremembami navedene uredbe.
The Unified Patent Court and the Benelux Court of Justice should be deemed to be courts within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 in order to ensure legal certainty and predictability for defendants who could be sued in those two Courts at a location situated in a Member State other than the one designated by the rules of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012.
Enotno sodišče za patente in Sodišče Beneluksa bi bilo treba šteti za sodišči v smislu Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012, da se zagotovita pravna varnost in predvidljivost za tožence, ki bi bili lahko toženi na teh dveh sodiščih v kraju v državi članici, ki ni država članica, določena v skladu s pravili Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012.
The amendments to Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 provided for in this Regulation with regard to the Unified Patent Court are intended to establish the international jurisdiction of that Court and do not affect the internal allocation of proceedings among the divisions of that Court nor the arrangements laid down in the UPC Agreement concerning the exercise of jurisdiction, including exclusive jurisdiction, during the transitional period provided for in that Agreement.
Spremembe Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012, predvidene v tej uredbi glede Enotnega sodišča za patente, so namenjene določitvi mednarodne pristojnosti navedenega sodišča in ne vplivajo na notranjo dodelitev postopkov med oddelki navedenega sodišča ali na ureditev iz Sporazuma o ESP glede izvajanja pristojnosti, vključno z izključno pristojnostjo, v prehodnem obdobju, predvidenem v navedenem sporazumu.
As courts common to several Member States, the Unified Patent Court and the Benelux Court of Justice cannot, unlike a court of one Member State, exercise jurisdiction on the basis of national law with respect to defendants not domiciled in a Member State.
Kot sodišči, skupni več državam članicam, Enotno sodišče za patente in Sodišče Beneluksa ne moreta izvajati pristojnosti na podlagi nacionalnega prava glede tožencev, ki nimajo stalnega prebivališča v državi članici, tako kot jo lahko izvajajo sodišča v državah članicah.
To allow those two Courts to exercise jurisdiction with respect to such defendants, the rules of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 should therefore, with regard to matters falling within the jurisdiction of, respectively, the Unified Patent Court and the Benelux Court of Justice, also apply to defendants domiciled in third States.
Da bi lahko navedeni sodišči izvajali pristojnost glede takih tožencev, bi bilo treba pravila Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012 v zvezi z zadevami, ki spadajo v pristojnost Enotnega sodišča za patente oziroma Sodišča Beneluksa, uporabljati tudi za tožence s stalnim prebivališčem v tretjih državah.
The existing rules of jurisdiction of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 ensure a close connection between proceedings to which that Regulation applies and the territory of the Member States.
Obstoječa pravila o pristojnosti iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012 zagotavljajo tesno povezavo med postopki, za katere se uporablja navedena uredba, in ozemljem držav članic.
It is therefore appropriate to extend those rules to proceedings against all defendants regardless of their domicile.
Zato je upravičeno, da se uporaba navedenih pravil razširi na postopke zoper vse tožence, ne glede na njihovo stalno prebivališče.
When applying the rules of jurisdiction of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, the Unified Patent Court and the Benelux Court of Justice (hereinafter individually referred to as a ‘common court’) should apply only those rules which are appropriate for the subject-matter for which jurisdiction has been conferred on them.
Enotno sodišče za patente in Sodišče Beneluksa (v nadaljnjem besedilu posamezno: skupno sodišče) bi morala pri uporabi pravil o pristojnosti iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012 uporabljati le tista pravila, ki so ustrezna za zadeve, za katere je bila nanju prenesena pristojnost.
A common court should be able to hear disputes involving defendants from third States on the basis of a subsidiary rule of jurisdiction in proceedings relating to an infringement of a European patent giving rise to damage both inside and outside the Union.
Skupno sodišče bi moralo na podlagi pravil subsidiarne pristojnosti imeti možnost obravnavati spore v postopkih v zvezi s kršitvijo evropskega patenta, ki je povzročila škodo tako v Uniji kot izven nje.
Such subsidiary jurisdiction should be exercised where property belonging to the defendant is located in any Member State party to the instrument establishing the common court and the dispute in question has a sufficient connection with any such Member State, for example because the claimant is domiciled there or the evidence relating to the dispute is available there.
Tako subsidiarno pristojnost bi bilo treba izvajati, če se premoženje v lasti toženca nahaja v kateri koli državi članici pogodbenici instrumenta o ustanovitvi skupnega sodišča, in je zadevni spor v zadostni meri povezan s katero koli tako državo članico, na primer zato, ker ima tožnik v njej stalno prebivališče ali so tam na voljo dokazi, povezani s sporom.
In establishing its jurisdiction, the common court should have regard to the value of the property in question, which should not be insignificant and which should be such as to make it possible to enforce the judgment, at least in part, in the Member States parties to the instrument establishing the common court.
Pri določanju svoje pristojnosti bi moralo skupno sodišče upoštevati vrednost zadevnega premoženja, ki ne bi smela biti neznatna in bi morala biti takšna, da bi bila mogoča vsaj delna izvršba sodne odločbe v državah članicah pogodbenicah instrumenta o ustanovitvi skupnega sodišča.
The rules of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 on lis pendens and related actions, aimed at preventing parallel proceedings and irreconcilable judgments, should apply when proceedings are brought in a common court and in a court of a Member State in which the UPC Agreement or, as the case may be, the Benelux Court of Justice Treaty does not apply.
Pravila Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012 o litispendenci in sorodnih pravdah, katerih cilj je preprečiti vzporedne postopke in nezdružljive sodne odločbe, bi bilo treba uporabljati, kadar se sprožijo postopki pred skupnim sodiščem in pred sodiščem države članice, v kateri se ne uporabljata Sporazum o ESP ali, odvisno od primera, Pogodba o Sodišču Beneluksa.
Judgments given by the Unified Patent Court or by the Benelux Court of Justice should be recognised and enforced in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 in a Member State not party to, as the case may be, the UPC Agreement or the Benelux Court of Justice Treaty.
Sodne odločbe sodišč države članice, ki ni pogodbenica, odvisno od primera, Sporazuma o ESP ali Pogodbe o Sodišču Beneluksa, bi morale biti priznane in izvršene v drugi državi članici v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1215/2012.
Judgments given by the courts of a Member State not party to, as the case may be, the UPC Agreement or the Benelux Court of Justice Treaty should be recognised and enforced in another Member State in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012.
Uredbo (EU) št. 1215/2012 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Ker cilja te uredbe države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se zaradi obsega in učinkov lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU).
Since the objective of this Regulation cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of its scale and effects, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenega cilja.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
V skladu s členom 3 in členom 4a(1) Protokola (št. 21) o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen PEU in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), sta obe državi članici podali uradno obvestilo, da želita sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te uredbe.
In accordance with Article 3 and Article 4a(1) of the Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), those Member States have notified their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Regulation.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 22) o stališču Danske, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja, vendar to ne posega v možnost, da Danska na podlagi člena 3 Sporazuma z dne 19. oktobra 2005 med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [5], uporablja spremembe Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012, določene v tej uredbi –
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol (No 22) on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application, without prejudice to the possibility for Denmark of applying the amendments to Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 laid down in this Regulation pursuant to Article 3 of the Agreement of 19 October 2005 between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters [5],
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
Article 1
V poglavju VII Uredbe (EU) št. 1215/2012 se vstavijo naslednji členi:
In Chapter VII of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012, the following Articles are inserted:
„Člen 71a
‘Article 71a
Za namene te uredbe je sodišče, ki je skupno več državam članicam, kot je določeno v odstavku 2 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: skupno sodišče), sodišče države članice, ko na podlagi instrumenta o njegovi ustanovitvi, tako skupno sodišče izvaja pristojnost v zadevah, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te uredbe.
For the purposes of this Regulation, a court common to several Member States as specified in paragraph 2 (a ‘common court’) shall be deemed to be a court of a Member State when, pursuant to the instrument establishing it, such a common court exercises jurisdiction in matters falling within the scope of this Regulation.
Za namene te uredbe je skupno sodišče vsako od naslednjih sodišč:
For the purposes of this Regulation, each of the following courts shall be a common court:
Enotno sodišče za patente, ustanovljeno 19. februarja 2013 s Sporazumom o Enotnem sodišču za patente (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum o ESP), in
the Unified Patent Court established by the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court signed on 19 February 2013 (the ‘UPC Agreement’); and
Sodišče Beneluksa, ustanovljeno s Pogodbo z dne 31. marca 1965 o ustanovitvi in statutu Sodišča Beneluksa (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Pogodba o Sodišču Beneluksa).
the Benelux Court of Justice established by the Treaty of 31 March 1965 concerning the establishment and statute of a Benelux Court of Justice (the ‘Benelux Court of Justice Treaty’).
Člen 71b
Article 71b
Pristojnost skupnega sodišča se določi, kot sledi:
The jurisdiction of a common court shall be determined as follows:
skupno sodišče je pristojno, kadar bi bila na podlagi te uredbe sodišča države članice pogodbenice instrumenta o ustanovitvi skupnega sodišča pristojna za zadeve, ki jih navedeni instrument ureja;
a common court shall have jurisdiction where, under this Regulation, the courts of a Member State party to the instrument establishing the common court would have jurisdiction in a matter governed by that instrument;
če toženec nima stalnega prebivališča v državi članici in ta uredba drugače ne določa pristojnosti zanj, se ustrezno uporablja poglavje II, ne glede na stalno prebivališče toženca.
where the defendant is not domiciled in a Member State, and this Regulation does not otherwise confer jurisdiction over him, Chapter II shall apply as appropriate regardless of the defendant’s domicile.
Pri skupnem sodišču se lahko vloži zahteva za začasne ukrepe, vključno z zaščitnimi ukrepi, tudi v primeru, ko so za odločanje o glavni stvari pristojna sodišča tretje države;
Application may be made to a common court for provisional, including protective, measures even if the courts of a third State have jurisdiction as to the substance of the matter;
kadar je skupno sodišče pristojno za toženca iz točke 2 v sporu v zvezi s kršitvijo evropskega patenta, ki je povzročila škodo v Uniji, je lahko to sodišče pristojno tudi za škodo, ki jo je taka kršitev povzročila izven Unije.
where a common court has jurisdiction over a defendant under point 2 in a dispute relating to an infringement of a European patent giving rise to damage within the Union, that court may also exercise jurisdiction in relation to damage arising outside the Union from such an infringement.
Taka pristojnost se lahko izvaja le, če se premoženje, ki pripada tožencu, nahaja v kateri koli državi članici pogodbenici instrumenta o ustanovitvi skupnega sodišča, in je spor v zadostni meri povezan s kakršno koli tako državo članico.
Such jurisdiction may only be established if property belonging to the defendant is located in any Member State party to the instrument establishing the common court and the dispute has a sufficient connection with any such Member State.
Člen 71c
Article 71c
Členi 29 do 32 se uporabljajo, kadar se postopek začne pred skupnim sodiščem in sodiščem države članice, ki ni pogodbenica instrumenta o ustanovitvi skupnega sodišča.
Articles 29 to 32 shall apply where proceedings are brought in a common court and in a court of a Member State not party to the instrument establishing the common court.
Členi 29 do 32 se uporabljajo, kadar se v prehodnem obdobju iz člena 83 Sporazuma o ESP postopek začne pred Enotnim sodiščem za patente in pred sodiščem države članice pogodbenice Sporazuma o ESP.
Articles 29 to 32 shall apply where, during the transitional period referred to in Article 83 of the UPC Agreement, proceedings are brought in the Unified Patent Court and in a court of a Member State party to the UPC Agreement.
Člen 71d
Article 71d
Ta uredba se uporablja za priznavanje in izvrševanje:
This Regulation shall apply to the recognition and enforcement of:
sodnih odločb skupnega sodišča, ki morajo biti priznane in izvršene v državi članici, ki ni pogodbenica instrumenta o ustanovitvi skupnega sodišča, in
judgments given by a common court which are to be recognised and enforced in a Member State not party to the instrument establishing the common court; and
sodnih odločb sodišč države članice, ki ni pogodbenica instrumenta o ustanovitvi skupnega sodišča, ki morajo biti priznane in izvršene v državi članici pogodbenici navedenega instrumenta.
judgments given by the courts of a Member State not party to the instrument establishing the common court which are to be recognised and enforced in a Member State party to that instrument.
Kadar pa se priznanje in izvršitev sodne odločbe, ki jo je izdalo skupno sodišče, zahteva v državi članici pogodbenici instrumenta o ustanovitvi skupnega sodišča, se namesto pravil o priznavanju in izvrševanju iz te uredbe uporabljajo morebitna pravila iz navedenega instrumenta.“
However, where recognition and enforcement of a judgment given by a common court is sought in a Member State party to the instrument establishing the common court, any rules of that instrument on recognition and enforcement shall apply instead of the rules of this Regulation.’.
Člen 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Uporablja se od 10. januarja 2015.
It shall apply from 10 January 2015.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v državah članicah v skladu s Pogodbama.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.
V Bruslju, 15. maja 2014
Done at Brussels, 15 May 2014.
Za Evropski parlament
Opinion of 26 February 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. aprila 2014 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in odločitev Sveta z dne 6. maja 2014.
Position of the European Parliament of 15 April 2014 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 6 May 2014.
UL C 175, 20.6.2013, str.
OJ C 175, 20.6.2013, p.
1.