natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the application of Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation, SWD(2013) 512 final.
Delovni dokument služb Komisije, ki spremlja Poročilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o izvajanju Direktive 2006/54/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. julija 2006 o uresničevanju načela enakih možnosti ter enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk pri zaposlovanju in poklicnem delu, SWD(2013) 512 final.
At least NACE Rev.2, sections B to S except O.
Vsaj NACE Rev. 2, oddelki od B do S, razen O.
Such discrimination is less likely to be the subject of a court case not only because potential victims are probably not aware of it, but also because it is more difficult for victims of pay discrimination to effectively enforce the principle of equal pay.
Verjetnost, da bi se taka diskriminacija obravnavala na sodišču, je majhna, ne le zato ker se je potencialne žrtve verjetno ne zavedajo, ampak tudi zato ker žrtve diskriminacije pri plačilu s težavo učinkovito uveljavljajo načelo enakega plačila.
Victims have to establish the facts that give rise to a presumption of discrimination in order to shift the burden of proof to the employer.
Da bi se dokazno breme preneslo na delodajalca, morajo žrtve dokazati dejstva, na podlagi katerih je mogoče domnevati o diskriminaciji.
P7_TA(2012)0225.
P7_TA(2012) 225.
The Commission’s Report to the European Parliament and the Council COM(2013) 861 final [8] indicates that implementation of the equal pay principle is hindered by a lack of transparency in pay systems, a lack of legal certainty on the concept of work of equal value, and by procedural obstacles. These obstacles include employees lacking the information they need to make a successful equal pay claim and in particular information about the pay levels for categories of employees who perform the same work or work of equal value.
Poročilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu (COM(2013) 861 final [8] nakazuje, da izvajanje načela enakega plačila ovirajo pomanjkanje preglednosti plačilnih sistemov, pomanjkanje pravne varnosti glede pojma dela enake vrednosti in postopkovne ovire. Med temi ovirami je dejstvo, da zaposleni ne razpolagajo z vsemi informacijami, potrebnimi za uspešen zahtevek za enako plačilo, zlasti pa ne z informacijami o ravni plačil za tiste kategorije zaposlenih, ki opravljajo enako delo ali delo enake vrednosti.
on a new approach to business failure and insolvency
o novem pristopu k poslovnemu neuspehu in insolventnosti
The objective of this Recommendation is to ensure that viable enterprises in financial difficulties, wherever they are located in the Union, have access to national insolvency frameworks which enable them to restructure at an early stage with a view to preventing their insolvency, and therefore maximise the total value to creditors, employees, owners and the economy as a whole.
Cilj tega priporočila je zagotoviti, da imajo podjetja v finančnih težavah, ki so sposobna preživeti, ne glede na svoj geografski položaj v Uniji dostop do nacionalnih insolvenčnih okvirov, ki jim omogočajo prestrukturiranje v zgodnji fazi, da bi preprečili njihovo plačilno nesposobnost in tako povečali njihovo skupno vrednost za upnike, zaposlene, lastnike in gospodarstvo kot celoto.
The Recommendation also aims at giving honest bankrupt entrepreneurs a second chance across the Union.
Poleg tega si priporočilo prizadeva dati drugo priložnost vsem poštenim podjetnikom v Uniji, ki so doživeli neuspeh.
National insolvency rules vary greatly in respect of the range of the procedures available to debtors facing financial difficulties in order to restructure their business.
Nacionalna pravila glede insolventnosti se zelo razlikujejo glede na obseg postopkov, ki so na razpolago dolžnikom v finančnih težavah, da prestrukturirajo svoje dejavnosti.
Some Member States have a limited range of procedures meaning that businesses are only able to restructure at a relatively late stage, in the context of formal insolvency proceedings.
V nekaterih državah članicah je obseg teh postopkov omejen, tako da se podjetja lahko prestrukturirajo šele razmeroma pozno, že v okviru formalnega postopka v primeru insolventnosti.
In other Member States, restructuring is possible at an earlier stage but the procedures available are not as effective as they could be or involve varying degrees of formality, in particular in relation to the use of out-of-court processes.
V drugih državah članicah je prestrukturiranje sicer mogoče že prej, vendar postopki niso tako učinkoviti, kot bi lahko bili, oziroma so povezani z različnimi stopnjami formalnosti, zlasti v zvezi z uporabo izvensodnih postopkov.
Similarly, national rules giving entrepreneurs a second chance, in particular by granting them discharge from the debts they have incurred in the course of their business vary as regards the length of the discharge period and the conditions under which discharge can be granted.
Tudi nacionalna pravila, ki podjetnikom dajejo drugo priložnost, zlasti z odobritvijo odpusta dolgov, nastalih pri njihovem poslovanju, se med seboj razlikujejo tako po dolžini preizkusnega obdobja za odpust dolgov kot po pogojih, pod katerimi ga je mogoče odobriti.
The discrepancies between the national restructuring frameworks, and between the national rules giving honest entrepreneurs a second chance lead to increased costs and uncertainty in assessing the risks of investing in another Member State, fragment conditions for access to credit and result in different recovery rates for creditors.
Razlike med nacionalnimi okviri prestrukturiranja in med nacionalnimi pravili, ki poštenim podjetnikom dajejo drugo priložnost, povzročajo večje stroške in negotovost pri ocenjevanju tveganj ob vlaganjih v drugih državah članicah in razdrobijo pogoje dostopa do posojil, tako da so njihov rezultat različne stopnje poplačila upnikov.
They make the design and adoption of consistent restructuring plans for cross-border groups of companies more difficult.
Zaradi takih razlik je oteženo oblikovanje in sprejemanje doslednih načrtov za prestrukturiranje za čezmejne skupine družb.
More generally, the discrepancies may serve as disincentives for businesses wishing to establish themselves in different Member States.
Splošneje gledano neskladja lahko odvračajo podjetja, ki želijo ustanoviti sedež v različnih državah članicah.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 [1] only deals with issues of jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement, applicable law and cooperation in cross-border insolvency proceedings.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1346/2000 [1] obravnava samo vprašanja sodne pristojnosti, priznavanja in izvrševanja, prava, ki se uporablja na tem področju, in sodelovanja pri čezmejnih postopkih v primeru insolventnosti.
The Commission proposal for the amendment of that Regulation [2] should extend the scope of the Regulation to preventive procedures which promote the rescue of an economically viable debtor and give a second chance to entrepreneurs.
Predlog Komisije za spremembo navedene uredbe [2] bi moral razširiti področje uporabe uredbe na preventivne postopke, ki spodbujajo sanacijo rentabilnih dolžnikov in podjetnikom dajejo drugo priložnost.
However, the proposed amendment does not tackle the discrepancies between those procedures in national law.
Vendar pa predlagana sprememba ne odpravlja razlik med takimi postopki v nacionalni zakonodaji.
On 15 November 2011, the European Parliament adopted a Resolution [3] on insolvency proceedings.
Evropski parlament je 15. novembra 2011 sprejel resolucijo [3] o postopkih v primeru insolventnosti.
It included recommendations for harmonising specific aspects of national insolvency law, including the conditions for the establishment, effects and content of restructuring plans.
Zajemala je priporočila za uskladitev nekaterih vidikov nacionalnega insolvenčnega prava, vključno s pogoji za oblikovanje načrtov za prestrukturiranje ter njihovimi učinki in vsebino.
In the Communication on the Single Market Act II [4] of 3 October 2012, the Commission undertook as a key action to modernise the Union insolvency rules in order to facilitate the survival of businesses and present a second chance to entrepreneurs.
Komisija si je v svojem sporočilu Akt za enotni trg II [4] z dne 3. oktobra 2012 kot ključni ukrep zadala nalogo, da bo posodobila pravila Unije v primeru insolventnosti, da bi olajšala preživetje podjetij in dala drugo priložnost podjetnikom.
To this end, the Commission announced that it would analyse how the efficiency of national insolvency laws could be further improved with a view to creating a level playing field for companies, entrepreneurs and private persons within the internal market.
V ta namen je Komisija napovedala, da bo proučila, kako bi bilo mogoče učinkovitost nacionalnih insolvenčnih zakonodaj še izboljšati, da bi ustvarili enake konkurenčne pogoje za podjetja, podjetnike in zasebna podjetja na notranjem trgu.
The Commission Communication on a new European approach to business failure and insolvency [5] of 12 December 2012 highlights certain areas where differences between domestic insolvency laws may hamper the establishment of an efficient internal market.
Sporočilo Komisije z dne 12. decembra 2012 o novem evropskem pristopu k poslovnemu neuspehu in insolventnosti [5] izpostavlja nekatera področja, na katerih razlike med nacionalnimi insolvenčnimi zakonodajami lahko zavirajo vzpostavitev učinkovitega notranjega trga.
It noted that the creation of a level playing field in these areas would lead to greater confidence in the systems of other Member States for companies, entrepreneurs and private individuals, and improve access to credit and encourage investment.
V njem je zapisano, da bi vzpostavitev enotnih konkurenčnih pogojev na teh področjih povečala zaupanje podjetij, podjetnikov in zasebnikov v sisteme drugih držav članic ter spodbudila naložbe.
On 9 January 2013 the Commission adopted the Entrepreneurship 2020 Action Plan [6] where the Member States are invited, among other things, to reduce when possible, the discharge time and debt settlement for honest entrepreneurs after bankruptcy to a maximum of 3 years by 2013 and to offer support services to businesses for early restructuring, advice to prevent bankruptcies and support for small and medium enterprises to restructure and re-launch.
Komisija je 9. januarja 2013 sprejela akcijski načrt Podjetništvo 2020 [6], ki države članice med drugim poziva, naj do leta 2013 poštenim podjetnikom, če je le mogoče, preizkusno dobo za odpust dolgov in poravnavo dolgov po možnosti omejijo na največ tri leta po stečaju ter podjetjem ponudijo podporne storitve za prestrukturiranje v zgodnji fazi, svetovanje za preprečitev stečaja ter podporo malim in srednjim podjetjem za prestrukturiranje in ponoven zagon.
Several Member States are currently undertaking reviews of their national insolvency laws with a view to improving the corporate rescue framework and the second chance for entrepreneurs.
Nekatere države članice trenutno izvajajo preglede nacionalnega insolvenčnega prava, da bi izboljšale okvir za reševanje podjetij in druge priložnosti za podjetnike.
Therefore it is opportune to encourage coherence in these and any future such national initiatives in order to strengthen the functioning of the internal market.
Zato je primerno spodbuditi skladnost teh in morebitnih prihodnjih nacionalnih pobud, da bi okrepili delovanje notranjega trga.
It is necessary to encourage greater coherence between the national insolvency frameworks in order to reduce divergences and inefficiencies which hamper the early restructuring of viable companies in financial difficulties and the possibility of a second chance for honest entrepreneurs, and thereby to lower the cost of restructuring for both debtors and creditors.
Spodbuditi je treba večjo skladnost med nacionalnimi insolvenčnimi okviri in tako zmanjšati razlike in neučinkovitosti, ki ovirajo zgodnje prestrukturiranje podjetij v finančnih težavah, ki so sposobna preživeti, in zagotavljanje druge priložnosti poštenim podjetnikom. To bi zmanjšalo stroške prestrukturiranja tako za dolžnike kot za upnike.
Greater coherence and increased efficiency in those national insolvency rules would maximise the returns to all types of creditors and investors and encourage cross-border investment.
Večja skladnost in izboljšana učinkovitost teh nacionalnih pravil glede insolventnosti bi povečala donose vseh vrst upnikov in vlagateljev ter spodbudila čezmejna vlaganja.
Greater coherence would also facilitate the restructuring of groups of companies irrespective of where the members of the group are located in the Union.
Povečanje skladnosti bi poleg tega olajšala prestrukturiranje skupin podjetij, ne glede na to, kje v Uniji imajo sedeže njihovi člani.
Furthermore, removing the barriers to effective restructuring of viable companies in financial difficulties contributes to saving jobs and also benefits the wider economy.
Odpravljanje ovir za učinkovito prestrukturiranje podjetij v finančnih težavah, ki so sposobna preživeti, poleg tega prispeva k ohranjanju delovnih mest ter koristi širšemu gospodarstvu.
Making it easier for entrepreneurs to have a second chance would also lead to higher self-employment rates in the Member States.
Olajšanje dostopa do druge priložnosti za podjetnike bi pomagala tudi povečati delež samozaposlitev v državah članicah.
Moreover, efficient insolvency frameworks would provide a better assessment of the risks involved in lending and borrowing decisions and smooth the adjustment for over-indebted firms, minimising the economic and social costs involved in their deleveraging process.
Učinkoviti insolvenčni okviri bi zagotavljali boljšo oceno tveganj, povezanih z odločitvami o dajanju in najemanju posojil, in olajšali prilagajanje prekomerno zadolženih podjetij, kar bi zmanjšalo ekonomske in socialne stroške v procesu njihovega razdolževanja.
Small and medium sized enterprises would benefit from a more coherent approach at Union level, since they do not have the necessary resources to cope with high restructuring costs and take advantage of the more efficient restructuring procedures in some Member States.
Malim in srednjim podjetjem bi bolj usklajen pristop na ravni Unije koristil, saj nimajo potrebnih virov za pokrivanje visokih stroškov prestrukturiranja in v nekaterih državah članicah uporabljajo učinkovitejše postopke prestrukturiranja.
Tax authorities also have an interest in an efficient restructuring framework for viable enterprises.
Za učinkovit okvir prestrukturiranja podjetij, sposobnih preživetja, so zainteresirani tudi davčni organi.
In implementing this Recommendation, Member States should be able to take appropriate measures to ensure the collection and recovery of tax revenues respecting the general principles of tax fairness and to take efficient measures in cases of fraud, evasion or abuse.
Pri izvajanju tega priporočila bi morale imeti države članice možnost, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za zagotovitev pobiranja in izterjave prihodkov od davkov ob spoštovanju splošnih načel davčne pravičnosti ter da sprejmejo učinkovite ukrepe v primeru davčnih goljufij, utaj ali zlorab.
It is appropriate to exclude from the scope of this Recommendation insurance undertakings, credit institutions, investment firms and collective investment undertakings, central counter parties, central securities depositories and other financial institutions which are subject to special recovery and resolution frameworks where national supervisory authorities have wide-ranging powers of intervention.
S področja uporabe tega priporočila je ustrezno izključiti zavarovalnice, kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja ter kolektivne naložbene podjeme, centralne nasprotne stranke, centralne depotne družbe in druge finančne institucije, za katere veljajo posebni okviri sanacije in reševanja, pri čemer imajo nacionalni nadzorni organi široka pooblastila za intervencijo.
Although consumer over-indebtedness and consumer bankruptcy are also not covered by the scope of this Recommendation, Member States are invited to explore the possibility of applying these recommendations also to consumers, since some of the principles followed in this Recommendation may also be relevant for them.
Prav tako v področju uporabe tega priporočila nista zajeta prezadolženost potrošnikov in osebni stečaj, vendar bi bilo priporočljivo, da bi države članice proučile možnosti za uporabo teh priporočil tudi pri potrošnikih, saj nekatera načela, ki jih upošteva to priporočilo, morda zadevajo tudi njih.
A restructuring framework should enable debtors to address their financial difficulties at an early stage, when their insolvency could be prevented and the continuation of their business assured.
Okvir prestrukturiranja bi moral dolžnikom omogočiti, da se svojih finančnih težav lotijo v zgodnji fazi, ko je še mogoče preprečiti njihovo plačilno nesposobnost in zagotoviti nadaljevanje njihovega poslovanja.
However, in order to avoid any potential risks of the procedure being misused, the financial difficulties of the debtor must be likely to lead to its insolvency and the restructuring plan must be capable of preventing the insolvency of the debtor and ensuring the viability of the business.
Vendar pa mora v izogib morebitnim tveganjem zlorabe postopka obstajati verjetnost, da bodo dolžnikove finančne težave povzročile njegovo plačilno nesposobnost ter da načrt za prestrukturiranje lahko prepreči dolžnikovo plačilno nesposobnost in zagotovi sposobnost podjetja za preživetje.
To promote efficiency and reduce delays and costs, national preventive restructuring frameworks should include flexible procedures limiting court formalities to where they are necessary and proportionate in order to safeguard the interests of creditors and other interested parties likely to be affected.
Za večjo učinkovitost ter zmanjšanje zamud in stroškov bi morali nacionalni okviri preventivnega prestrukturiranja vključevati prožne postopke, v katerih so sodne formalnosti omejene na primere, ko so nujne in sorazmerne za zaščito pravic upnikov in drugih zainteresiranih strani, ki jih bo prestrukturiranje verjetno zadevalo.
For example, to avoid unnecessary costs and reflect the early nature of the procedure, debtors should in principle be left in control of their assets and the appointment of a mediator or a supervisor should not be compulsory, but made on a case-by-case basis.
Dolžniki bi na primer v izogib nepotrebnim stroškom in kot dokaz, da gre za zgodnjo fazo postopka, načeloma morali ohraniti nadzor nad svojimi sredstvi in imenovanje mediatorja oziroma nadzornika ne bi smelo biti obvezno, ampak odvisno od vsakega posameznega primera.
A debtor should be able to request the court for a stay of individual enforcement actions and suspension of insolvency proceedings whose opening has been requested by creditors where such actions may adversely affect negotiations and hamper the prospects of a restructuring of the debtor’s business.
Dolžnik bi moral imeti možnost od sodišča zahtevati začasno ustavitev posameznih postopkov izvršbe in odložitev postopkov v primeru insolventnosti, katerih začetek zahtevajo upniki, če bi taka dejanja lahko škodovala pogajanjem in ovirala možnosti za prestrukturiranje dolžnikovega podjetja.
However, in order to provide for a fair balance between the rights of the debtor and of creditors, and taking into account the experience of recent reforms in the Member States, the stay should be initially granted for a period of no more than 4 months.
Da pa bi zagotovili pravično ravnotežje med pravicami dolžnika in upnikov ter ob upoštevanju izkušenj nedavnih reform v državah članicah, bi bilo treba začasno ustavitev najprej odobriti za največ štiri mesece.
Court confirmation of a restructuring plan is necessary to ensure that the reduction of the rights of creditors is proportionate to the benefits of the restructuring and that creditors have access to an effective remedy, in full compliance with the freedom to conduct a business and the right to property as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Sodna potrditev načrta za prestrukturiranje je potrebna za zagotovitev, da je skrčenje pravic upnikov sorazmerno s koristmi prestrukturiranja in da imajo upniki na voljo učinkovito pravno sredstvo ter da se v celoti spoštujeta svoboda gospodarske pobude in lastninska pravica, kot sta zagotovljeni z Listino o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije.
The court should therefore reject a plan where it is likely that the attempted restructuring reduces the rights of dissenting creditors below what they could reasonably expect to receive in the absence of a restructuring of the debtor’s business.
Sodišče bi zato moralo zavrniti načrt, pri katerem je verjetno, da bo načrtovano prestrukturiranje pravice upnikov, ki nanj ne pristajajo, skrčilo pod raven, ki bi jo upravičeno lahko pričakovali, če dolžnikovo podjetje ne bi bilo prestrukturirano.
The effects of bankruptcy, in particular the social stigma, legal consequences and the ongoing inability to pay off debts constitute important disincentives for entrepreneurs seeking to set up a business or have a second chance, even if evidence shows that entrepreneurs who have gone bankrupt have more chance to be successful the second time.
Posledice stečaja, zlasti družbena stigmatizacija, pravne posledice in trajajoča nezmožnost odplačevanja dolgov, so pomembni odvračilni elementi za podjetnike, ki želijo ustanoviti podjetje ali dobiti drugo priložnost, čeprav so dokazi, da imajo podjetniki po stečaju naslednjič večje možnosti za uspeh.
Steps should therefore be taken to reduce the negative effects of bankruptcy on entrepreneurs, by making provisions for a full discharge of debts after a maximum period of time,
Zato bi bilo treba sprejeti ukrepe za zmanjšanje negativnih posledic stečaja za podjetnike, tako da se po določenem najdaljšem obdobju omogoči popoln odpust dolga –
I. OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECT MATTER
I. CILJ IN PODROČJE UREJANJA
The objective of this Recommendation is to encourage Member States to put in place a framework that enables the efficient restructuring of viable enterprises in financial difficulty and give honest entrepreneurs a second chance, thereby promoting entrepreneurship, investment and employment and contributing to reducing the obstacles to the smooth functioning of the internal market.
Cilj tega priporočila je spodbuditi države članice, da vzpostavijo okvir, ki omogoča učinkovito prestrukturiranje podjetij v finančnih težavah, ki so sposobna preživeti, ter poštenim podjetnikom ponuja drugo priložnost in s tem spodbuja podjetništvo, naložbe in zaposlovanje ter prispeva k zmanjševanju ovir za nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga.
By reducing those obstacles, the Recommendation aims in particular to:
Z zmanjšanjem teh ovir naj bi se zlasti:
lower the costs of assessing the risks of investing in another Member State;
znižali stroški ocenjevanja tveganj v zvezi z vlaganji v druge države članice;
increase recovery rates for creditors; and
povečale stopnje poplačila upnikov in
remove the difficulties in restructuring cross-border groups of companies.
odpravile težave pri prestrukturiranju čezmejnih skupin družb.
This Recommendation provides for minimum standards on:
To priporočilo vsebuje minimalne standarde glede:
preventive restructuring frameworks; and
okvirov preventivnega prestrukturiranja ter
discharge of debts of bankrupt entrepreneurs.
ustavitve stečajnega postopka za podjetnike v stečaju.
When implementing this Recommendation, Member States should be able to take appropriate and efficient measures to ensure the enforcement of taxes, in particular in cases of fraud, evasion or abuse.
Pri izvajanju tega priporočila bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti, da sprejmejo ustrezne in učinkovite ukrepe za zagotovitev izterjave davkov, zlasti v primerih davčnih goljufij, utaj ali zlorab.