natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Austrian authorities are nevertheless supporting the construction of another large intermodal terminal in Vienna Inzersdorf, which has just started.
V zvezi z učinkovitostjo multifunkcijskih storitev Slovaška ugotavlja, da lastništvo prevoznega podjetja nad infrastrukturo povzroča monopolni položaj, zato lastnik infrastrukture ne bi smel uporabljati infrastrukture tudi kot prevoznik.
WienCont claims that construction of a second terminal in the region, in Bratislava, would weaken the position of Vienna as a hub.
V zvezi s tem Slovaška poudarja dejstvo, da ima družba Metrans 55–60-odstotni tržni delež.
It further claims that the construction of new terminals would lead to a shift from road transport to rail transport.
Slovaška ugotavlja, da družba Metrans na svojem spletnem mestu, na katerem domnevno oglašuje storitve pretovarjanja, storitev intermodalnega terminala ne ponuja ponudnikom intermodalnega prevoza, temveč špediterjem in lizinškim družbam.
In 2011 and 2012 WienCont's capacity was 250000 ITUs.
Slovaška trdi, da statistike o celinskem prevozu, ki jih navaja družba Metrans, ne obstajajo.
It handled 72541 ITUs in 2012 and 71369 ITUs in 2011, with transport from Slovakia accounting for 2968 ITUs in 2012 and 2148 ITUs in 2011, while transport to Slovakia was zero in 2012 and 59 ITUs in 2011.
Slovaška ni nikoli prejela informacij, ki bi kazale, da ima družba Metrans v lasti potrebno opremo za ravnanje s celinskimi intermodalnimi prevoznimi enotami.
WienCont's handling charges per container in terminal are comparable to those in the measure for a container in terminal, but higher for warehouse use and for handling a trailer.
Predvideva, da družba Metrans med celinski prevoz prišteva ladijske zabojnike, ki so bili natovorjeni zunaj Evrope in pretovorjeni v enem od celinskih terminalov.
SLOVAKIA'S COMMENTS ON THE COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES
Slovaška trdi, da statistika UIRR [6] izpodbija trditev družbe Metrans o neobstoju trga za polpriklopnike in zamenljiva tovorišča.
Slovakia noted that four of the six parties that demonstrated their interest supported the aid for the construction of the public terminals.
Slovaška pojasnjuje tudi, da je zasnova načrtovanih terminalov primerna zlasti za celinski prevoz.
Slovakia's reactions to the submissions from Metrans and WienCont are set out below.
Z opremo za pretovarjanje bo mogoče ravnati s polpriklopniki in zamenljivimi tovorišči.
REACTION TO THE SUBMISSION FROM METRANS
Prostor pod mostovi bo oblikovan posebej za celinske intermodalne prevozne enote:
Slovakia reasserts that Metrans is not a neutral terminal operator as it is itself a transport operator.
med intermodalnimi prevoznimi enotami bo prostor, potreben za ravnanje z oprtnimi držali, na voljo pa bodo tudi diagonalna parkirna mesta za polpriklopnike, ki bodo omogočala neposredno ravnanje, ki se bo izvajalo s tovornjaki.
It points to the submissions from Bohemiakombi and Kombiverkehr, who mention a possible risk of conflict of interest of Metrans who acts both as terminal operator and as an operator of combined transport and door-to-door transport.
Zato bo v nasprotju z drugimi terminali, namenjenimi zabojnikom, s temi vrstami intermodalnih prevoznih enot mogoče ravnati v enem samem koraku.
Slovakia also refers to the requirement under EU law that an operator of railway infrastructure may not be in competition with the transport undertakings using that railway infrastructure.
To bo znižalo ceno pretovarjanja celinskih intermodalnih prevoznih enot v javnih terminalih.
Slovakia reasserts that it can enforce the neutrality of the operator which it will select for the operation of its public terminals.
Slovaška meni, da ekonomske študije v zvezi z javnimi terminali kažejo, da izgradnje in upravljanja terminalov ni mogoče financirati izključno iz prihodkov dejavnosti terminalov.
As regards the transporters who use the terminals of Metrans, Slovakia notes that it is not aware of any of them operating a regular combined transport route.
Slovaška predvideva, da družba Metrans navzkrižno financira izgradnjo terminalov iz prihodkov svojih dejavnosti prevoza.
Concerning the efficiency of all-in-one services Slovakia notes that the ownership of infrastructure by a transport undertaking leads to a monopolistic position and therefore the owner of the infrastructure should not also use the infrastructure as a transport operator.
Slovaška je predlagala, da bi z družbo Metrans sodelovala pri izgradnji javnih terminalov, vendar družba Metrans ni bila pripravljena izpolniti pogojev Slovaške v zvezi z nediskriminacijskim dostopom.
In this connection Slovakia points to the fact that Metrans has a market share of 55-60 %.
Prihodnje izkrivljanje konkurence
Slovakia notes that the website of Metrans, on which Metrans claims to advertise its transhipment services, does not offer intermodal terminal service to operators of intermodal transport, but to shipping companies and leasing companies.
Slovaška poudarja, da so v Direktivi 2012/34/EU določena načela za oblikovanje uporabnin za uporabo storitev terminalov in odgovornost neodvisnega regulatornega organa, da oceni te uporabnine in jih regulira v primeru pritožb.
Slovakia claims that there are no statistics showing the continental transport claimed by Metrans.
Slovaška navaja, da podpira tudi razvoj kombiniranega prevoza, ki ga ponujajo zasebne družbe.
Slovakia has never received any information showing that Metrans owns the equipment necessary for the handling of continental ITUs.
Tako je na primer vložila sredstva v povečanje zmogljivosti na železniški progi Bratislava–Dunajska Streda zaradi povečanih potreb družbe Metrans.
It assumes that Metrans considers continental transport to include sea containers that were loaded outside of Europe, but transhipped in one of the inland terminals.
Slovaška ugotavlja, da je družba Metrans označila svoj cenik storitev v terminalih za zaupnega, kar kaže, da njene cene niso bile objavljene.
Slovakia argues that the UIRR statistics [6] refute Metrans's claim that there is no market for semi-trailers and swap bodies.
Slovaška v odgovoru na to neutemeljeno trditev navaja pripombe družbe Kombiverkehr, v skladu s katerimi naj bi se kombinirani celinski prevoz razvil, če bodo neodvisni upravljavci terminalov zagotovili nediskriminacijski dostop do svojih storitev in če cena posameznega ravnanja ne presega 20–25 EUR na pretovorjeno enoto.
The transhipment equipment will be able to handle semi-trailers and swap bodies.
Ker pa prehod s cestnega prevoza na železniški prevoz na Slovaškem še ni dosegel te ravni, še vedno obstaja velik potencial za intermodalni celinski prevoz, ki ne vključuje le ladijskih zabojnikov.
The space under the crane will be designed specifically to serve continental ITUs:
Kombinirani prevoz brez spremstva:
there will be spaces between the ITUs which are necessary for handling by piggyback hangers; and there will be diagonal parking spaces for semi-trailers, which will enable direct handling by trucks.
Tržni segment KP
Therefore, unlike in other terminals specialised in containers, it will be possible to handle these types of ITUs in a single step.
Celinski
This will lower the transhipment price for continental ITUs at the public terminals.
Pomorski
In line with EU priorities for railway transport policy Slovakia is investing in infrastructure that will allow transportation of 750 m-long trains.
Skupaj
Slovakia also takes the view that the Metrans terminal in Dunajská Streda cannot be extended, since it is limited on one side by the E575 road and on the other side by the curved track connecting the terminal to the main rail network.
Notranji KP
According to Slovakia, the economic studies prepared for the public terminals show that the construction and operation of the terminals cannot be financed solely from revenue from the activities of the terminals.
Mednarodni KP
Slovakia assumes that Metrans cross-finances the construction of the terminals from its revenue from transport activities.
Skupni KP
Slovakia also offered cooperation with Metrans in construction of the public terminals, but Metrans was not willing to fulfil Slovakia's conditions regarding non-discriminatory access.
Slovaška trdi, da ker stroški pretovarjanja po mnenju družbe Metrans znašajo približno 2 % skupnih stroškov prevoza in ker je po mnenju družbe Kombiverkehr začetne stroške nove celinske poti mogoče povrniti šele po enem letu ali dveh, ni zelo verjetno, da bi upravljavci novih poti uvedli nove poti do destinacij, kjer poti že obstajajo.
Competition will be distorted
Slovaška trdi, da bo, medtem ko so stranke družbe Metrans predvsem špediterji in družba Metrans ponuja zlasti prevoz ladijskih zabojnikov, novi terminal namenjen predvsem prehodu tovora s ceste na železniške tire.
Slovakia points out that Directive 2012/34/EU lays down the principles for setting fees for the use of services of terminals as well as the responsibility of an independent railway regulator to assess these fees and to regulate them in the event of complaints.
Namenjen bo drugi skupini strank, njegove storitve pa se bodo ponujale v različnih tržnih segmentih.
Slovakia states that it also supports the development of combined transport by private companies;
Slovaška trdi, da zmanjšanje obsega prevoza na Slovaškem ne vpliva na oceno potenciala za razvoj celinskega prevoza, saj je razlog za njegovo zmanjšanje zlasti zmanjšanje nacionalnega obsega prevoza.
it for instance invested in the capacity increase on the Bratislava-Dunajská Streda railway track, which was due to the increased needs of Metrans.
Zato Slovaška bolj zaupa statistiki (predloženi v zgornjih pripombah), ki kaže povečanje obsega cestnega prevoza, saj je to obseg, ki naj bi se dosegel s prehodom s cestnega prevoza na železniški prevoz.
Slovakia notes that Metrans marked its price list of terminal services as confidential, which shows that its prices are not published.
Slovaška je pripomnila, da bodo novi terminali predstavljali zgolj 16 % prihodnje zmogljivosti slovaških intermodalnih terminalov.
In its response to this unsubstantiated claim, Slovakia cites the submission from Kombiverkehr, which states that continental combined transport will develop if independent operators of terminals ensure non-discriminatory access to their services and if the price per handling operation does not exceed EUR 20-25 per transhipped unit.
V odzivu na pripombe družbe Metrans v zvezi z izkrivljanjem konkurence, nezmožnostjo privabljanja novega obsega prehoda s cestnega prometa in pokrivanjem novega povpraševanja z uporabo obstoječih zmogljivosti se Slovaška sklicuje na pripombe družbe Kombiverkehr, ki ocenjuje, da obstaja znaten potencial za kombinirani celinski prevoz na Slovaško in z nje.
Slovakia further argues that according to the UIC [7] statistics continental combined transport accounts for 47,14 % of total combined transport.
Družba Kombiverkehr navaja, da tedenski obseg cestnega prevoza iz severne Nemčije, Belgije in Nizozemske na Slovaško in v obratni smeri znaša približno 1000 tovornjakov.
However, since in Slovakia the shift from road to rail has not yet reached this level, there is still high potential for continental intermodal transport, other than just sea containers.
Družba Kombiverkehr predvideva, da bo prevažala le del tovora, ki ga zdaj prevaža po cesti, zato ne bo usmerjena k nobenemu od sedanjih virov prihodkov obstoječih terminalov.
Unaccompanied combined transport:
ODZIV NA PRIPOMBE DRUŽBE WIENCONT
CT market segment
Prvič, v odziv na trditev družbe WienCont, da je za razširitev svojega terminala prejemala pomoč z zgolj 31-odstotno intenzivnostjo, medtem ko Slovaška ponuja 100-odstotno pomoč za začetno naložbo, Slovaška ugotavlja, da so večinski lastniki družbe WienCont javni organi.
Continental
Poleg tega je železniška infrastruktura, ki jo uporablja, v lasti upravljavca železniške infrastrukture, zemljišče, ki ga uporablja, pa je v lasti mesta Dunaj.
Maritime
Stroški izgradnje novih slovaških terminalov vključujejo nakup zemljišča, izgradnjo železniške infrastrukture in izgradnjo popolnoma novega terminala.
Domestic CT
Poleg tega je to nasprotovanje po mnenju Slovaške v nasprotju s cilji Kohezijskega sklada, katerega namen je zmanjšati razlike med državami članicami s financiranjem infrastrukture in varstvom okolja.
International CT
Drugič, v odziv na trditev, da družba WienCont pokriva celotno povpraševanje na območju Dunaja in da bi terminal v Bratislavi ogrozil njene poslovne dejavnosti, Slovaška ugotavlja, da prihaja s Slovaške zgolj 4,6 % skupnega obsega, s katerim upravlja družba WienCont.
Total CT
Tudi če bi družba WienCont izgubila ves ta obseg, o čemer Slovaška dvomi, škoda za družbo ne bi bila tako velika, da bi upravičila odločitev, da se moderni trimodalni terminal ob reki Donavi v Bratislavi ne bo zgradil.
Slovakia argues that, since, according to Metrans, the costs of transhipment represent about 2 % of total transport costs and since, according to Kombiverkehr, the initial cost of a new continental route can be recovered only after one or two years, it is highly unlikely that operators of new routes would introduce new routes to destinations where a route already exists.
NADALJNJA IZMENJAVA INFORMACIJ MED DRUŽBAMA METRANS IN WIENCONT TER SLOVAŠKO
Slovakia claims that, while the customers of Metrans are predominantly shipping companies and Metrans transports mainly sea containers, the new terminal will focus on the transfer of cargo from road to rail.
Nadaljnja izmenjava informacij med Komisijo ter Slovaško, družbo Metrans in družbo WienCont je pojasnila vrsto vprašanj v informacijah, ki so jih predložile te strani.
It will be for a different group of customers and offer its services in different market segments.
Čeprav družba Metrans ni mogla dokazati obsega kombiniranega celinskega prevoza, ki ga zagotavlja, je lahko prikazala, da tak prevoz zagotavlja in da njen sedanji obseg celinskega prevoza ni zanemarljiv.
Savings in external costs; existing capacities are sufficient and increased demand can be satisfied by the market
Družba Metrans za celinski prevoz uporablja zabojnike, zlasti zabojnike s širino 13,7 m in cisterne-zabojnike.
Slovakia argues that the decrease in transported volumes in Slovakia is irrelevant for estimating the potential for the development of continental transport, as the decrease is due mainly to the fall in national transport volumes.
Družba Metrans je dokazala tudi, da ima v lasti določeno opremo, ki je primerna za pretovarjanje intermodalnih prevoznih enot, ki niso zabojniki.
Therefore, Slovakia sets greater store by the statistics (provided in its submission above) that show the increase in volumes of road transport, as these are the relevant volumes to be targeted by the shift from road to rail.
Slovaška je Komisiji predložila statistične podatkovne liste, ki jih je prejela od družbe Metrans in s katerih je razvidno, da družba Metrans ni prevažala nobenih tovornjakov, zamenljivih tovorišč in polpriklopnikov.
Slovakia submits that the new terminals will represent only 16 % of the future capacity of Slovak intermodal terminals.
Za izpodbijanje argumentov družbe Metrans, da ne obstaja povpraševanje po kombiniranem prevozu v intermodalnih prevoznih enotah, razen za zabojnike, Slovaška predstavlja primere nevtralnega dostopa do terminala v Lovosicah na Češkem, ki je začel delovati leta 2006 in na svojih rednih poteh prevaža predvsem zabojnike ter pri katerem je število prevoženih intermodalnih prevoznih enot med letoma 2007 in 2012 naraslo za 81 %, do leta 2012 pa so zamenljiva tovorišča in polpriklopniki znašali 75 % pretovarjanja.
In reacting to the comments by Metrans regarding distortion of competition, the inability to attract new volumes from road transport and coverage of new demand using existing capacities, Slovakia refers to the submission from Kombiverkehr, which estimates the potential for continental combined transport to and from Slovakia to be considerable.
Slovaška je podala tudi primer nevtralnega dostopa do terminala Wuppertal – Langerfeld, znotraj katerega se zdaj skoraj izključno prevažajo zamenljiva tovorišča in polpriklopniki.
Kombiverkehr states that the weekly road transport volume from northern Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands to Slovakia and vice versais about 1000 lorries.
Celo v terminalu družbe WienCont, ki je pomembna lokacija za pretovarjanje ladijskih zabojnikov, zamenljiva tovorišča znašajo 21 % pretovarjanja.
Kombiverkehr envisages transferring only some of the cargo currently transported by road, so it would not target any of the current sources of turnover of the existing terminals.
Družba WienCont je predložila predstavitev, ki jo je oblikovala družba Snizek & Partner, v kateri je navedeno, da bo kakovost delovanja v terminalu, ki deluje z 88-odstotno zmogljivostjo, resno oslabljena.
REACTION TO THE SUBMISSION FROM WIENCONT
Da bi Slovaška ublažila morebitne pomisleke o obsegu potencialnega izkrivljanja konkurence in da bi preskusila svoje predpostavke v zvezi s prenosom tovora s cestnega prometa na železniški promet, se je strinjala, da bo sprva kot poskusni projekt zgradila samo en terminal.
First, in response to WienCont's point that it had aid intensity of only 31 % for expanding its terminal, whereas Slovakia is offering 100 % aid for the initial investment, Slovakia notes that WienCont is majority-owned by the public authorities.
Slovaška je zato omejila prvotno priglasitev samo na terminal Žilina – Teplička.
Moreover, the railway infrastructure it uses is owned by the railway infrastructure manager and the land it uses is owned by the City of Vienna.
Ta terminal bo od terminalov družbe Metrans v Dunajski Stredi in Košicah ter od terminala družbe WienCont oddaljen več kot 200 km.
The construction costs for the new Slovak terminals include both the purchase of land and the construction of railway infrastructure, as well as the construction of an entirely new terminal.
Slovaška je poleg tega obvestila Komisijo, da se bo v bližnji prihodnosti zaprl obstoječi terminal družbe Intrans v Žilini.
Slovakia states that the overall investment in the construction of the WienCont terminal, including the rails and the land, was financed more than 90 % from public funds.
Ocena ukrepa, ki jo je izvedla Komisija, je navedena spodaj.
Furthermore, according to Slovakia, this objection is contrary to the objectives of the Cohesion Fund, which aims at reducing differences between Member States by financing infrastructure and environmental protection.
OCENA POMOČI
Second, in response to the claim that WienCont covers all demand in the Vienna area and the Bratislava terminal would threaten its commercial activities, Slovakia notes that only 4,6 % of the total volumes handled at WienCont are from Slovakia.
V skladu s členom 107(1) PDEU „je vsaka pomoč, ki jo dodeli država članica, ali kakršna koli vrsta pomoči iz državnih sredstev, ki izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco z dajanjem prednosti posameznim podjetjem ali proizvodnji posameznega blaga, nezdružljiva z notranjim trgom, kolikor prizadene trgovino med državami članicami“.
Even if WienCont lost all these volumes, which Slovakia doubts, the company would not be harmed to an extent that would justify not constructing a modern tri-modal terminal in Bratislava on the Danube.
Merila iz člena 107(1) PDEU so kumulativna.
FOLLOW-UP EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION WITH METRANS, WIENCONT AND SLOVAKIA
Za določitev, ali ukrep pomeni državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) PDEU, morajo biti torej izpolnjeni vsi naslednji pogoji.
The Commission's follow-up exchange of information with Slovakia, Metrans and WienCont clarified a number of issues in the information provided by these parties.
Za finančno podporo bi moralo zlasti veljati, da:
Although Metrans could not prove the extent to which it provides continental combined transport, it was able to show that it does provide such transport and its current continental transport volumes are not negligible.
jo dodeli država ali se dodeli iz državnih sredstev;
For continental transport Metrans uses containers, in particular the 45-foot (13,7 m) wide containers and tank containers.
daje prednost upravičenim podjetjem;
Metrans has also shown that it owns certain equipment, suitable for transhipping intermodal transport units other than containers.
daje prednost posameznim podjetjem ali proizvodnji posameznega blaga (merilo selektivnosti);
Slovakia provided the Commission with statistical data sheets obtained from Metrans that show that Metrans did not transport any lorries, swap-bodies or semi-trailers.
izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco ter prizadene trgovino med državami članicami.
In order to refute the arguments put forward by Metrans that there is no demand for combined transport in intermodal transport units (ITU) other than containers, Slovakia puts forward examples of the neutral access terminal in Lovosice in the Czech Republic, which started operating in 2006 with regular routes mainly transporting containers, where the amount of transported ITUs increased by 81 % between 2007 and 2012, and by 2012 swap bodies and semi-trailers accounted for 75 % of transhipments.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije lahko izgradnja in upravljanje infrastrukture pomenita gospodarsko dejavnost [8].
Another example given by Slovakia is the neutral access terminal of Wuppertal-Langerfeld, which currently transports almost exclusively swap bodies and semi-trailers.
Ker priglašeni ukrep zadeva pomoč za naložbe v infrastrukturo, ki se uporablja v komercialne namene, je treba izgradnjo in upravljanje take infrastrukture šteti za gospodarsko dejavnost, zaradi česar ukrep spada v področje uporabe člena 107(1) PDEU.
Even at the WienCont terminal, which is a significant transhipment location for sea containers, swap bodies account for 21 % of transhipments.
Za priglašeni ukrep bodo slovaški organi zgradili terminal in izbrali koncesionarja, ki bo odgovoren za njegovo upravljanje.
WienCont provided a presentation produced by Snizek & Partner which claims that in a terminal that is operated at 88 % of its capacity the quality of the operations will be seriously impaired.
Začetna naložba bo financirana iz Kohezijskega sklada (85 %) in iz državnih sredstev (15 %).
Finally, in order to alleviate possible concerns as to the extent of possible distortion of competition and in order to test its assumptions concerning the transfer of cargo from road to rail, Slovakia agreed that it would initially construct just one terminal as a pilot project.
Ker se sredstva iz Kohezijskega sklada prenesejo ustreznemu nacionalnemu organu, se šteje, da so na voljo slovaškim organom, zato predstavljajo državna sredstva.
Slovakia therefore limited the original notification to just the terminal in Žilina-Teplička.
Prednost:
This terminal will be more than 200 km away from the Metrans terminals in Dunajská Streda and Košice and from the WienCont terminal.
na podlagi predhodne tržne preiskave, ki so jo izvedli slovaški organi, ni mogoče izključiti, da bo udeležba v prihodnjem postopku izbire zelo omejena in da ta postopek ne bo izpolnjeval meril konkurenčnega javnega razpisa.
Moreover, Slovakia informed the Commission that the existing terminal of Intrans in Žilina would be closed in the near future.
Ob upoštevanju velike verjetnosti, da javni razpis ne bo dovolj konkurenčen, posledično ni mogoče izključiti dajanja gospodarske prednosti upravljavcu.
The Commission's assessment of the measure is set out below.
Selektivnost:
ASSESSMENT OF THE AID
ker ukrep koristi samo izbranemu upravljavcu terminala, bi ga bilo treba šteti za selektivnega po naravi.
Article 107(1) TFEU states that ‘any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, be incompatible with the internal market’.
Izkrivljanje konkurence in vpliv na trgovino znotraj EU:
The criteria laid down in Article 107(1) TFEU are cumulative.
kadar pomoč, ki jo dodeli država članica, okrepi položaj nekega podjetja v primerjavi z drugimi podjetji, ki so si konkurenčna pri trgovini znotraj Unije, je treba taka podjetja obravnavati, kot da jih je navedena pomoč prizadela [9].