natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having published a draft of this Regulation in accordance with Article 6 and Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 994/98,
po objavi osnutka te uredbe v skladu s členoma 6 in 8(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 994/98,
Having consulted the Advisory Committee on State Aid,
po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom za državno pomoč,
State funding meeting the criteria laid down in Article 107(1) of the Treaty constitutes State aid and requires notification to the Commission by virtue of Article 108(3) thereof.
Dodeljevanje državnih sredstev, ki izpolnjuje merila iz člena 107(1) Pogodbe, pomeni državno pomoč, ki jo je treba priglasiti Komisiji v skladu s členom 108(3) Pogodbe.
However, pursuant to Article 109 of the Treaty, the Council may determine categories of aid that are exempted from that notification requirement.
Vendar lahko v skladu s členom 109 Pogodbe Svet določi vrste pomoči, ki so izvzete iz navedene obveznosti priglasitve.
In accordance with Article 108(4) of the Treaty the Commission may adopt regulations relating to those categories of aid.
Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 108(4) Pogodbe sprejme uredbe glede navedenih vrst pomoči.
Regulation (EC) No 994/98 empowers the Commission to declare, in accordance with Article 109 of the Treaty, that certain categories of aid may be exempted from the notification requirement of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 994/98 je Komisija pooblaščena, da v skladu s členom 109 Pogodbe razglasi, da se lahko nekatere vrste pomoči izvzamejo iz obveznosti priglasitve iz člena 108(3) Pogodbe.
On the basis of that Regulation, the Commission adopted Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 [2] which applies until 30 June 2014.
Komisija je na podlagi navedene uredbe sprejela Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1857/2006 [2], ki se uporablja do 30. junija 2014.
On 22 July 2013 Regulation (EC) No 994/98 was amended by Regulation (EU) No 733/2013 [3] to empower the Commission to extend the block exemption to new categories of aid in respect of which clear compatibility conditions can be defined.
Uredba (ES) št. 994/98 je bila 22. julija 2013 spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 733/2013 [3], ki Komisijo pooblašča, da razširi skupinske izjeme na nove vrste pomoči, v zvezi s katerimi je mogoče določiti jasne pogoje združljivosti.
Such new categories of aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors should include: aid in favour of heritage conservation, aid in favour of making good the damage caused by natural disasters and aid in favour of forestry which can, under certain conditions, be exempted from the notification requirement of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Takšne nove vrste pomoči v kmetijskem in gozdarskem sektorju bi morale vključevati pomoč za ohranjanje kulturne dediščine, pomoč za nadomestilo škode zaradi naravnih nesreč in pomoč gozdarstvu, ki je pod nekaterimi pogoji lahko izvzeta iz obveznosti priglasitve iz člena 108(3) Pogodbe.
Article 42 of the Treaty provides that the rules on competition apply to the production of and trade in agricultural products only to the extent determined by the European Parliament and the Council.
Člen 42 Pogodbe zagotavlja, da se pravila o konkurenci uporabljajo za proizvodnjo kmetijskih proizvodov in trgovino s kmetijskimi proizvodi le v obsegu, ki ga določita Evropski parlament in Svet.
Article 211(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council [4] provides that State aid rules apply to aid for the production of and trade in agricultural products, subject to specific derogations.
Člen 211(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] določa, da se pravila o državni pomoči ob upoštevanju nekaterih odstopanj uporabljajo za pomoč za proizvodnjo kmetijskih proizvodov in trgovino z njimi.
Article 211(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 provides that State aid rules do not apply to payments made by Member States for measures provided for in that Regulation which are partly or wholly financed by the Union and for measures included in Articles 213 to 218 of that Regulation.
Člen 211(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 določa, da se pravila o državni pomoči ne uporabljajo za plačila držav članic za ukrepe iz navedene uredbe, ki jih delno ali v celoti financira Unija, in za ukrepe iz členov od 213 do 218 navedene uredbe.
Moreover, State aid rules do not apply to payments made by Member States pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] nor to additional national financing, within the scope of Article 42 of the Treaty.
Poleg tega se pravila o državni pomoči ne uporabljajo za plačila, ki jih države članice izvršijo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1305/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5], ali za dodatno nacionalno financiranje iz področja uporabe člena 42 Pogodbe.
Such payments intended to provide additional national financing within the scope of Article 42 of the Treaty, have to comply with the criteria of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 in order to be approved by the Commission as part of the rural development programme of a given Member State.
Taka plačila, katerih namen je zagotoviti dodatno nacionalno financiranje, ki spada v področje uporabe člena 42 Pogodbe, morajo izpolnjevati merila iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013, da jih lahko Komisija odobri kot del programa razvoja podeželja v določeni državi članici.
Nevertheless, State aid rules apply, both to the part co-financed under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and to additional national financing for measures falling outside the scope of Article 42 of the Treaty.
Kljub temu se pravila o državni pomoči uporabljajo za sofinancirani del v okviru Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) in dodatno nacionalno financiranje za ukrepe, ki ne spadajo v področje uporabe člena 42 Pogodbe.
As the economic effects of aid do not change depending on whether or not it is partly financed by the Union, or whether it is financed by a Member State alone, there should be consistency and coherence between the Commission's policy in respect of the control of State aid, and the support which is granted under the Union's own common agricultural and rural development policy.
Ker so gospodarski učinki pomoči enaki ne glede na to, ali jo delno financira Unija ali ne oz. v celoti država članica, bi morala biti politika Komisije v zvezi z nadzorom državne pomoči dosledna in skladna s podporo, dodeljeno na podlagi skupne kmetijske politike in politike razvoja podeželja Unije.
The scope of this Regulation should therefore be aligned with that of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013, in particular as regards aid in favour of the forestry sector and aid in favour of micro and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) active in rural areas.
Zato bi bilo treba področje uporabe te uredbe uskladiti s področjem uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013, zlasti v zvezi s pomočjo za gozdarski sektor ter pomočjo za mikro, mala in srednja podjetja (MSP), ki so dejavna na podeželju.
This Regulation should apply to aid measures in favour of forestry and in favour of SMEs active in the rural areas which fall outside the scope of Article 42 of the Treaty which are covered by Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 only and insofar as those measures are included in the rural development programmes and are co-financed by the EAFRD.
Ta uredba bi se morala uporabljati za ukrepe pomoči za gozdarstvo ter MSP, ki so dejavna na podeželju in ne spadajo v področje uporabe člena 42 Pogodbe ter so zajeta v Uredbi (EU) št. 1305/2013, in sicer samo, kadar so navedeni ukrepi vključeni v programe razvoja podeželja ter sofinancirani v okviru EKSRP.
On the other hand, this Regulation should not apply to aid to undertakings in rural areas for activities falling outside the scope of Article 42 of the Treaty or to the forestry sector where there is no direct link to the rural development programmes and no co-financing from the EAFRD.
Po drugi strani pa se ta uredba ne bi smela uporabljati za pomoč podjetjem na podeželju za dejavnosti, ki ne spadajo v področje uporabe člena 42 Pogodbe, ali za pomoč gozdarskemu sektorju, kadar ne obstajata neposredna povezava s programi razvoja podeželja in sofinanciranje v okviru EKSRP.
However, aid for knowledge transfer and information actions in the forestry sector and aid for advisory services in the forestry sector should be possible to be granted outside the rural development programmes wholly financed by the Member States, provided that they comply with the respective compatibility conditions laid down in this Regulation.
Vendar bi morala obstajati možnost, da se pomoč za dejavnosti prenosa znanja in informiranja v gozdarskem sektorju in pomoč za storitve svetovanja v gozdarskem sektorju lahko dodeli zunaj okvira programov za razvoj podeželja, ki jih v celoti financirajo države članice, pod pogojem, da izpolnjujejo zadevne pogoje o združljivosti iz te uredbe.
A simplified procedure should be made available for Member States when they are required to obtain State aid clearance for both the co-financed part and the additional financing of their national rural development programmes, in accordance with Article 81(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013.
Države članice bi morale imeti na voljo poenostavljen postopek, ko morajo pridobiti odobritev za državno pomoč za sofinancirani del in za dodatno financiranje svojih nacionalnih programov razvoja podeželja v skladu s čle nom 81(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013.
In that respect such aid should be exempted from the notification requirement of Article 108(3) of the Treaty provided that it complies with the respective compatibility conditions laid down in this Regulation.
Glede na to bi morala biti takšna pomoč izvzeta iz obveznosti priglasitve iz člena 108(3) Pogodbe, če izpolnjuje ustrezne pogoje o združljivosti iz te uredbe.
With the Communication of 8 May 2012 from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee on the Regions — EU State Aid Modernisation (SAM) [6], the Commission launched a wider review of the State aid rules.
Komisija je s Sporočilom Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij – Posodobitev področja državnih pomoči EU z dne 8. maja 2012 [6] začela širši pregled pravil o državni pomoči.
The main objectives of this modernisation are: (i) to achieve sustainable, smart and inclusive growth in a competitive internal market, while contributing to Member State efforts towards a more efficient use of public finances; (ii) to focus Commission ex ante scrutiny on cases with the biggest impact on the internal market, while strengthening Member State cooperation in State aid enforcement; and (iii) to streamline the rules and provide for faster, better informed and more robust decisions based on a clear economic rationale, a common approach and clear obligations.
Glavni cilji te posodobitve so: (i) dosežek trajnostne, pametne in vključujoče rasti na konkurenčnem notranjem trgu ter hkrati prispevanje k prizadevanjem držav članic za učinkovitejšo porabo javnih financ; (ii) osredotočenje predhodnega preverjanja Komisije na primere pomoči z največjim vplivom na notranji trg in hkrati krepitev sodelovanja držav članic pri izvrševanju državne pomoči, ter (iii) racionaliziranje pravil in zagotovitev hitrejšega, bolje informiranega ter verodostojnejšega sprejemanja odločitev na podlagi jasnih ekonomskih razlogov, skupnega pristopa in jasnih obveznosti.
This Regulation should allow for a better prioritisation of State aid enforcement activities, and greater simplification and should enhance transparency, effective evaluation and the control of compliance with the State aid rules at national and Union levels, while preserving the institutional competences of the Commission and the Member States.
Ta uredba bi morala omogočati boljše določanje prednostnih nalog izvrševanja in večjo poenostavitev ter zagotoviti večjo preglednost, učinkovito ocenjevanje in nadzor skladnosti s pravili o državni pomoči na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Unije, pri tem pa ohraniti institucionalne pristojnosti Komisije in držav članic.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti ta uredba ne presega tega, kar je potrebno za uresničitev navedenih ciljev.
The Commission has applied Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty to SMEs active in the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products in numerous cases, in particular in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006, Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 [7] and the Community Guidelines on State aid in the agriculture and forestry sector 2007 to 2013 [8].
Komisija je člena 107 in 108 Pogodbe v številnih primerih uporabila za MSP, ki so dejavna v proizvodnji, predelavi in trženju kmetijskih proizvodov, zlasti v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 1857/2006, Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 800/2008 [7] in Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči v kmetijskem in gozdarskem sektorju 2007–2013 [8].
It has thus gained considerable experience in this field.
Zato je na tem področju pridobila znatne izkušnje.
The Commission's experience has allowed it, on the one hand, to better define the conditions under which certain categories of aid can be considered compatible with the internal market and to extend the scope of block exemptions and, on the other hand, made clear the necessity to strengthen transparency as well as monitoring and allow for a proper evaluation of large schemes in light of their effect on competition in the internal market.
Izkušnje so Komisiji po eni strani omogočile, da lahko bolje opredeli pogoje, pod katerimi se nekatere vrste pomoči lahko obravnavajo kot združljive z notranjim trgom, in razširi področje uporabe skupinskih izjem, po drugi strani pa je postalo jasno, da je treba okrepiti preglednost in spremljanje ter omogočiti ustrezno ocenjevanje velikih shem glede na njihov učinek na konkurenco na notranjem trgu.
The general conditions for the application of this Regulation should be defined on the basis of a set of common principles that ensure that the aid serves a purpose of common interest, has a clear incentive effect, is appropriate and proportionate, is granted in full transparency and subject to a control mechanism and regular evaluation, and does not adversely affect trading conditions to extent that is contrary to the common interest.
Splošne pogoje za uporabo te uredbe bi bilo treba opredeliti na podlagi vrste skupnih načel, ki zagotavljajo, da je pomoč namenjena skupnemu interesu, ima jasen spodbujevalni učinek, je ustrezna in sorazmerna, povsem pregledno dodeljena, je predmet nadzornega mehanizma in rednega ocenjevanja ter ne škodi pogojem trgovanja v obsegu, ki je v nasprotju s skupnim interesom.
Aid that fulfils all the conditions laid down in this Regulation, both general and specific to the relevant categories of aid, should be exempted from the notification requirement laid down in Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Pomoč, ki izpolnjuje vse pogoje iz te uredbe, tako splošne pogoje kot pogoje za posamezne zadevne vrste pomoči, bi bilo treba izvzeti iz obveznosti priglasitve iz člena 108(3) Pogodbe.
With a view to ensuring efficient supervision and simplifying administration, but without weakening Commission monitoring, exempted aid (aid schemes and individual aids) should contain an express reference to this Regulation.
Zaradi učinkovitega nadzora in poenostavitve upravnih postopkov, ne da bi Komisija pri tem oslabila spremljanje, bi se morala izvzeta pomoč (sheme pomoči in individualna pomoč) izrecno sklicevati na to uredbo.
State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty not covered by this Regulation remains subject to the notification requirement of Article 108(3) of the Treaty.
Za državno pomoč v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe, ki je ta uredba ne vključuje, se še naprej uporablja obveznost priglasitve iz člena 108(3) Pogodbe.
This Regulation is without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to notify aid the objectives of which correspond to objectives covered by this Regulation.
Ta uredba ne posega v možnost držav članic, da priglasijo pomoč, katere cilji ustrezajo ciljem, ki jih zajema ta uredba.
In view of the greater potential impact of large schemes on trade and competition, aid schemes with an average annual State aid budget exceeding a threshold based on an absolute value should in principle be subject to State aid evaluation.
Zaradi večje možnosti vpliva velikih shem na trgovino in konkurenco, bi morale sheme pomoči, katerih povprečni letni proračun državne pomoči presega prag, temelječ na absolutni vrednosti, načeloma biti predmet ocene državne pomoči.
The evaluation should aim at verifying whether the assumptions and conditions underlying the compatibility of the scheme have been achieved, as well as the effectiveness of the aid measure in the light of its general and specific objectives and should provide indications on the impact of the scheme on competition and trade.
Vrednotenje bi moralo biti usmerjeno v preverjanje, ali so bile dosežene predpostavke in pogoji, ki so podlaga za združljivost sheme, kot tudi učinkovitost ukrepa pomoči glede na njegove splošne in posebne cilje, ter zagotoviti navedbe o učinku sheme na konkurenco in trgovino.
In order to ensure equal treatment, State aid evaluation should be carried out on the basis of an evaluation plan approved by the Commission.
Da bi se zagotovila enaka obravnava, je treba ocenjevanje državne pomoči izvesti na podlagi načrta ocenjevanja, ki ga odobri Komisija.
While such plan should normally be drawn up at the moment of the design of the scheme and approved in time for the scheme to enter into force, this may not be possible in all cases.
Čeprav bi bilo tak načrt običajno treba pripraviti ob oblikovanju sheme in odobriti pravočasno, da shema lahko začne veljati, to morda ni mogoče v vseh primerih.
Therefore, in order not to delay their entry into force, this Regulation will apply to such schemes for a maximum period of six months.
Da zato ne bi prišlo do zamude pri začetku njihove veljavnosti, se bo ta uredba uporabljala za take sheme največ šest mesecev.
The Commission may decide to extend this period, upon approval of the evaluation plan.
Komisija se lahko odloči, da to obdobje podaljša na podlagi odobritve načrta ocenjevanja.
To this end, the evaluation plan should be notified to the Commission within 20 working days following the entry into force of the scheme.
V ta namen bi bilo treba načrt ocenjevanja priglasiti Komisiji v 20 delovnih dneh po začetku veljavnosti sheme.
The Commission can also exceptionally decide that an evaluation is not necessary given the specificities of the case.
Komisija se lahko izjemoma tudi odloči, da ocena glede na posebnosti primera ni nujna.
The Commission should receive from the Member State the necessary information to be able to carry out the assessment of the evaluation plan and request additional information without undue delay allowing the Member State to complete the missing elements for the Commission to take a decision.
Komisija bi morala od države članice prejeti potrebne informacije, da bi lahko ocenila načrt ocenjevanja in zahtevala dodatne informacije brez nepotrebnega odlašanja, kar bi državi članici omogočilo, da dopolni manjkajoče elemente, da bi Komisija lahko sprejela odločitev.
In view of the novelty of this process, the Commission will provide, in a separate document, a detailed guidance on the procedure applicable during the 6 months period for the approval of the evaluation plan and the relevant templates through which the evaluation plans will have to be submitted.
Glede na novost tega postopka bo Komisija v ločenem dokumentu zagotovila podrobne smernice o postopku, ki se uporablja v obdobju 6 mesecev, predvidenih za odobritev načrta ocenjevanja, in ustrezne predloge, na podlagi katerih bo treba predložiti načrte ocenjevanja.
Alterations of schemes subject to evaluation, other than modifications which cannot affect the compatibility of the aid scheme under this Regulation or cannot significantly affect the content of the approved evaluation plan, should be assessed taking account of the outcome of such evaluation and should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Spremembe shem, ki so predmet ocenjevanja, razen preoblikovanja, ki ne morejo vplivati na združljivost sheme pomoči na podlagi te uredbe ali ne morejo znatno vplivati na vsebino odobrenega načrta ocenjevanja, bi bilo treba oceniti ob upoštevanju rezultatov takega ocenjevanja ter jih izključiti iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
The alterations such as purely formal modifications, administrative modifications or alterations carried out within the framework of the EU co-financed measures should not, in principle, be considered as significantly affecting the content of the approved evaluation plan.
Za spremembe, kot so povsem formalna preoblikovanja, upravna preoblikovanja ali spremembe, izvedene v okviru sofinanciranih ukrepov EU, načeloma ne bi smelo veljati, da znatno vplivajo na vsebino odobrenega načrta ocenjevanja.
This Regulation should not apply to aid contingent upon the use of domestic over imported products or aid to export-related activities.
Ta uredba se ne bi smela uporabljati za pomoč, ki je odvisna od uporabe domačih proizvodov v breme uvoženih proizvodov, ali pomoč dejavnostim, povezanim z izvozom.
In particular, it should not apply to aid financing the establishment and operation of a distribution network in another Member State or third country.
Zlasti se ne bi smela uporabljati za pomoč, s katero se financirata vzpostavitev in delovanje distribucijske mreže v drugi državi članici ali tretji državi.
Aid towards the cost of participating in trade fairs or of studies or consultancy services needed for the launch of a new or existing product on a new market in another Member State or third country should not normally constitute aid to export-related activities.
Pomoč za kritje stroškov sodelovanja na sejmih, stroškov študija ali svetovalnih storitev, potrebnih za uvajanje novega ali obstoječega proizvoda na novem trgu v drugi državi članici ali tretji državi, se običajno ne bi smelo šteti za pomoč za dejavnosti, povezane z izvozom.
The Commission should ensure that authorised aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent that is contrary to the general interest.
Komisija bi morala zagotoviti, da odobrena pomoč nima škodljivega vpliva na pogoje trgovanja, ki bi bili v nasprotju s skupnim interesom.
Therefore, aid in favour of a beneficiary which is subject to an outstanding recovery order following a previous Commission decision declaring an aid illegal and incompatible with the internal market should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation with the exception of aid to make good the damage caused by certain natural disasters.
Zato bi bilo treba iz področja uporabe te uredbe izključiti pomoč, dodeljeno upravičencu, ki je naslovnik neporavnanega naloga za izterjavo zaradi predhodnega sklepa Komisije o razglasitvi pomoči za nezakonito in nezdružljivo z notranjim trgom, z izjemo pomoči za odpravo škode zaradi nekaterih naravnih nesreč.