natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Labour costs
Povprečni stroški dela vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije so se v obravnavanem obdobju gibali na naslednji način:
The average labour costs of the sampled Union producers developed over the period considered as follows:
Preglednica 9
Table 9
Povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega
Average labour costs per employee
Povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega (v EUR)
Average labour costs per employee (EUR)
Od leta 2010 do obdobja preiskave so se povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega pri vzorčenih proizvajalcih Unije povečali za 4 %.
Between 2010 and the investigation period, the average labour costs per employee of the sampled Union producers increased by 4 %.
To skupno povečanje v obravnavanem obdobju je razmeroma nizko in v vsakem primeru pod splošnim povečanjem stroškov dela (7,5 %) [9] in stopnjo inflacije (9,6 %) [10] v Uniji v istem obdobju.
This overall increase during the period considered is relatively low and in any event below the general increase in labour cost (7,5 %) [9] and the inflation rate (9,6 %) [10] in the Union during the same period.
Zaloge
Inventories
Postrvi so pokvarljiv izdelek z rokom uporabnosti, ki je krajši od dveh tednov, razen če so zamrznjene.
Trout is a perishable product, which unless frozen, has a shelf life of less than two weeks.
Ker vzorčeni proizvajalci Unije ne skladiščijo zalog prirejenih postrvi in svojih izdelkov ne zamrzujejo v znatnem obsegu, se ravni zalog ne štejejo za pomemben kazalnik škode v tej preiskavi.
As the sampled Union producers do not keep stocks of trout after harvest and do not, to any significant degree, freeze their production, stock levels are not considered to be a meaningful indicator of injury in this investigation.
Dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe, donosnost naložb in zmožnost zbiranja kapitala
Profitability, cash flow, investments, return on investments and ability to raise capital
Dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe in donosnost naložb vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije so se v obravnavanem obdobju gibali na naslednji način:
Profitability, cash flow, investments and return on investments of the sampled Union producers developed over the period considered as follows:
Preglednica 10
Table 10
Dobičkonosnost, denarni tok, naložbe in donosnost naložb
Profitability, cash flow, investments and return on investments
Dobičkonosnost prodaje v Uniji nepovezanim strankam (% prihodka od prodaje)
Profitability of sales in the Union to unrelated customers (% of sales turnover)
Denarni tok (v 1000 EUR)
Cash flow (1000 EUR)
Naložbe (v 1000 EUR)
Investments (1000 EUR)
Donosnost naložb
Return on investments
Komisija je dobičkonosnost vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije določila tako, da je neto dobiček pred obdavčitvijo pri prodaji podobnega izdelka nepovezanim strankam v Uniji izrazila kot odstotek prihodkov od te prodaje.
The Commission established the profitability of the sampled Union producers by expressing the pre-tax net profit of the sales of the like product to unrelated customers in the Union as a percentage of the turnover of those sales.
V letih 2010 in 2011 se je dobičkonosnost sicer rahlo povečala, vendar je ostala na nizki ravni le nekoliko nad pragom dobičkonosnosti.
In 2010 and 2011 profitability increased slightly but remained at low levels only slightly above break-even.
Položaj se je še dodatno poslabšal leta 2012, ko je dobičkonosnost postala negativna in v obdobju preiskave, ko so se izgube še dodatno povečale.
The situation declined further in 2012 where profitability turned negative and during the investigation period where losses further increased.
Razlog za to, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 142, je trend naraščanja proizvodnih stroškov, hkrati pa industrija Unije ni mogla ustrezno povišati svojih cen.
This, as explained in recital 142, is due to the increasing trend of production cost while the Union industry could not raise its prices accordingly.
V zadevnem obdobju so mnogi proizvajalci Unije prenehali poslovati.
Throughout the period concerned, a number of Union producers went out of business.
Neto denarni tok je sposobnost proizvajalcev Unije, da sami financirajo svoje dejavnosti.
The net cash flow is the ability of the Union producers to self-finance their activities.
Trend neto denarnega toka je naraščal od leta 2010 do leta 2011, nato pa je začel upadati.
The trend in net cash flow increased from 2010 to 2011 and declined after that.
Med letom 2012 in obdobjem preiskave je močno upadel, zaradi česar je skupni kumulativni denarni tok v zadevnem obdobju negativen.
Between 2012 and the investigation period it declined deeply, rendering the total cumulative cash flow of the period concerned negative.
Na splošno negativen trend denarnega toka sledi upadu dobičkonosnosti, čeprav sta bila negativen denarni tok v letu 2010 in znatno zmanjšanje med letom 2012 in obdobjem preiskave tudi posledica naložb zaradi prizadevanj za konsolidacijo, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 149.
Generally, the negative trend in cash flow follows the declining trend of the profitability, although the negative cash flow in 2010 and the substantial drop between 2012 and the investigation period was also the result of investments made due to consolidation efforts as explained in recital 149.
Naložbe so se med letoma 2010 in 2012 le nekoliko povečale, v obdobju preiskave pa je nastopilo znatno povečanje.
Investments increased only slightly between 2010 and 2012 whereas there was a significant increase in the investigation period.
Naložbe so bile povezane z nakupom proizvodnih zmogljivosti podjetij v stečaju in/ali konsolidacijo povezanih podjetij in ne z zamenjavo obstoječih sredstev ali nakupom dodatne in/ali nove opreme.
Investments were linked to acquisition of production facilities from discontinued companies and/or consolidation of related companies and not to the replacement of existing assets or the acquisition of additional and/or new equipment.
Zato je bil vrhunec naložb v obdobju preiskave povezan predvsem s konsolidacijo.
Thus, the peak in investments observed in the investigation period was primarily related to consolidation.
To potrjuje dejstvo, da se je v obravnavanem obdobju skupna proizvodna zmogljivost zmanjšala za 17 %.
This is confirmed by the fact that the total production capacity decreased by 17 % during the period considered.
Donosnost naložb je dobiček v odstotkih neto knjigovodske vrednosti naložb.
The return on investments is the profit in percentage of the net book value of investments.
Donosnost naložb je sledila istemu trendu kot dobičkonosnost, in sicer se je povečevala od leta 2010 do leta 2011, hkrati pa je ostala zgolj nekoliko nad pragom dobička.
Return on investment followed the same trend than profitability, namely it increased from 2010 to 2011 while only remaining merely over the break-even point.
Donosnost naložb se je nato zmanjšala in leta 2012 postala negativna.
Return on investment dropped afterwards and became negative in 2012.
V obdobju preiskave se je še dodatno zmanjšala.
It declined further during the investigation period.
Ta negativni razvoj je izhajal iz dejstva, da industrija Unije ni mogla zvišati svojih cen, kljub trendu naraščanja proizvodnih stroškov.
This negative development resulted from the fact that the Union industry could not raise its prices, despite the increasing trend of production cost.
Kar zadeva zmožnost zbiranja kapitala, je poslabšanje sposobnosti vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, da zagotovijo denarna sredstva za podobni izdelek, z zmanjšanjem notranje ustvarjenih sredstev oslabilo njihov finančni položaj.
As far as the ability to raise capital is concerned, the deterioration of the ability of the sampled Union producers to generate cash for the like product was weakening their financial situation by reducing the internally generated funds.
Kar zadeva financiranje s strani bank, so se pojavljale vedno večje težave pri pridobivanju takega financiranja.
As regards funding from banks, increasing difficulties to obtain bank financing were encountered.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je zmožnost zbiranja kapitala na splošno poslabšala.
The investigation found that, overall, the ability to raise capital deteriorated.
Sklep o škodi
Conclusion on injury
Preiskava je v tej fazi jasno pokazala, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo.
The investigation clearly showed at this stage that the Union industry suffered material injury.
Škoda se je zlasti izražala v izgubi tržnega deleža in zmanjšanju dobičkonosnosti.
In the same time, imports of the product concerned gained market share and they were found to undercut the Union industry prices on the Union market.
Nekateri kazalniki škode, kot so prodajna cena na enoto, povprečni stroški dela na zaposlenega, produktivnost in naložbe, so se razvijali pozitivno.
Certain injury indicators, such as unit sales price, average labour cost per employee, productivity and investments, developed positively.
Kar zadeva prodajne cene na enoto, so dvig povzročili povečani proizvodni stroški.
As regards the unit sales prices the increase was due to increased production cost.
Industrija Unije je morala zmanjšati število zaposlenih, kar je povzročilo povečanje produktivnosti na zaposlenega.
However, this increase did not compensate the full increase of unit cost, thus turning profitability to negative in 2012.
Povečanje naložb je bilo v glavnem povezano z nakupom proizvodnih zmogljivosti podjetij v stečaju in konsolidacijo in ne z zamenjavo obstoječih sredstev ali nakupom nove opreme.
As explained in the recital 144 the Union industry's increase in average labour cost per employee was below the general increase in labour cost and the inflation rate in the Union.
Večina kazalnikov škode je kazala negativne trende.
The Union industry had to reduce its number of employees which resulted in an increase in productivity per employee.
Industrija Unije je utrpela upad dobičkonosnosti, denarnega toka in donosnosti naložb.
The increase of investments was mainly linked to the acquisition of production facilities from discontinued companies and consolidation and not to replacement of existing assets or the acquisition of new equipment.
Dobičkonosnost in donosnost naložb, ki sta bili zgolj nad pragom dobička v letih 2010 in 2011, sta leta 2012 postali negativni in se še dodatno zmanjšali v obdobju preiskave.
Most injury indicators showed negative trends.
Hkrati so se obseg proizvodnje, proizvodna zmogljivost, zaposlenost in tržni deleži zmanjšali zaradi pritiska subvencioniranega uvoza.
The Union industry suffered a decline in profitability, cash flow and return on investments.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je Komisija v tej fazi sklenila, da je industrija Unije utrpela znatno škodo v smislu člena 8(4) osnovne uredbe.
The profitability and return on investments, which were merely over the break-even point during 2010 and 2011, became negative in 2012 and declined further during the investigation period.
E. VZROČNA ZVEZA
At the same time, the production volume, production capacity, employment and market shares were reduced under the pressure of the subsidised imports.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 8(5) osnovne uredbe preučila, ali je subvencioniran uvoz iz zadevne države povzročil znatno škodo industriji Unije.
On the basis of the above, the Commission concluded at this stage that the Union industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 8(4) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 8(6) osnovne uredbe je preučila tudi druge znane dejavnike, ki bi lahko hkrati povzročali škodo industriji Unije.
E. CAUSATION
Komisija je zagotovila, da se morebitna škoda, ki so jo povzročili drugi dejavniki in ne subvencioniran uvoz iz zadevne države, ni pripisala temu subvencioniranemu uvozu.
In accordance with Article 8(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether the subsidised imports from the country concerned caused material injury to the Union industry.
Ti dejavniki so:
In accordance with Article 8(6) of the basic Regulation, the Commission also examined whether other known factors could at the same time have injured the Union industry.
uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav;
The Commission ensured that any possible injury caused by factors other than the subsidised imports from the country concerned was not attributed to the subsidised imports.
Izvoz industrije Unije
These factors are:
Razvoj potrošnje
Imports of other third countries
Konkurenca z drugimi vrstami rib
Export performance of the Union industry
Upravna in regulativna bremena, geografske omejitve
Development of consumption
cenovni pritisk, ki ga izvajajo veliki trgovci na drobno;
Competition with other fish species
Prevelike naložbe, finančni stroški, nihanja menjalnih tečajev in izredne izgube, povezane s sodnimi postopki
Administrative and regulatory burdens, geographical limitations
Učinki subvencioniranega uvoza
Price pressure exerted by large retailers
Da bi Komisija ugotovila obstoj vzročne zveze med subvencioniranim uvozom zadevnega izdelka iz Turčije in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, je preučila obseg in ravni cen subvencioniranega uvoza ter obseg, v katerem bi ta uvoz lahko povzročil znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Over-investments, financial expenses, exchange rate fluctuations and extra-ordinary losses linked to litigations
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je subvencionirani uvoz iz zadevne države v obravnavanem obdobju skoraj podvojil.
Effects of the subsidised imports
Posledično se je njegov tržni delež povečal za 8 odstotnih točk, in sicer z 9 % v letu 2010 na 17 % v obdobju preiskave.
To establish the existence of a causal link between the subsidised imports of the product concerned from Turkey and the injury suffered by the Union industry, the Commission analysed the volume and price levels of the subsidised imports and the extent to which these could have caused the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
To se je zgodilo kljub trendu upadanja potrošnje.
The investigation showed that subsidised imports from the country concerned nearly doubled during the period considered.
Hkrati je industrija Unije izgubila 8 odstotnih točk svojega tržnega deleža.
This resulted in a gain of market share of 8 percentage points, from 9 % in 2010 to 17 % in the investigation period.
Povprečne cene subvencioniranega uvoza so se med letom 2010 in obdobjem preiskave povečale za 5 %.
This happened despite a decreasing trend of consumption.
To povečanje je bilo posledica splošnega povečanja stroškov proizvodnje.
At the same time the Union industry lost 8 percentage points of its market share.
Vendar pa so uvozne cene ostale na občutno nižji ravni v primerjavi s cenami industrije Unije.
The average prices of the subsidised imports increased by 5 % between 2010 and the investigation period.
Subvencionirani uvoz je nelojalno nižal prodajne cene industrije Unije, pri čemer je v obdobju preiskave povprečna stopnja nelojalno znižanih prodajnih cen znašala 9 %.
This increase was due to the overall increase in cost of production.
Hkrati pa zaradi povečanega subvencioniranega uvoza zadevnega izdelka, ki je povzročil znaten cenovni pritisk na trg Unije, industrija Unije ni mogla dovolj zvišati svojih prodajnih cen, da bi s tem zagotovila kritje povišanih proizvodnih stroškov, v vsakem primeru pa jih ni mogla zvišati nad raven cen subvencioniranega uvoza iz Turčije.
However, import prices remained at significantly lower levels than those of the Union industry.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je povečanje subvencioniranega uvoza iz Turčije in povečanje njegovega tržnega deleža jasno sovpadalo z izgubo tržnega deleža industrije Unije, zmanjšanjem obsega proizvodnje, proizvodne zmogljivosti in zaposlenosti ter negativnim trendom dobičkonosnosti, denarnega toka in donosnosti naložb.
The subsidised imports undercut Union industry prices with an average undercutting margin of 9 % during the investigation period.
Zato se je štelo, da subvencionirani uvoz izvaja pritisk na industrijo Unije, kar je prispevalo k temu, da ta ni mogla zvišati svojih prodajnih cen v skladu s stroški, da je utrpela izgubo tržnega deleža ter splošno gospodarsko in finančno oslabitev.
At the same time given the increased subsidised imports of the product concerned which exerted a significant price pressure on the Union market, the Union industry could not raise its sales prices sufficiently so that they could cover for its increased cost of production and in any case not above the Turkish subsidised imports' prices.
Komisija je ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega v tej fazi sklenila, da je treba poslabšanje položaja industrije Unije pripisati povečanju obsega uvoza iz Turčije po subvencioniranih cenah in da je bil ta uvoz odločilen za znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
It was found that the increase of subsidised imports from Turkey and their market share gain clearly coincided with the loss of market share of the Union industry, the decrease in production volumes, production capacity and employment, the downward trend of profitability, cash flow, and return of investments.
Učinki drugih dejavnikov
Thus, the subsidised imports were considered as exercising pressure on the Union industry which subsequently contributed to its inability to increase its sales prices in line with the cost, to loss of market share and to overall economic and financial deterioration,
Uvoz iz tretjih držav
Based on the above, the Commission concluded at this stage that the Union industry's deteriorating state had to be attributed to the increase in imports at subsidised prices from Turkey and that these imports had a determining role in the material injury suffered by the Union industry.
Obseg uvoza iz drugih tretjih držav (Čila, Norveške, Bosne in Hercegovine ter drugih) se je v obravnavanem obdobju gibal na naslednji način:
Effects of other factors
Preglednica 11
Imports from third countries
Država
The volume of imports from other third countries (Chile, Norway, Bosnia and Herzegovina and others) developed over the period considered as follows:
Skupno vse tretje države, razen zadevne države
Table 11
Obseg (v kg WFE)
Total of all third countries except the country concerned
Obseg uvoza iz vseh drugih tretjih držav je bil na nizki ravni in se je v obravnavanem obdobju celo nekoliko zmanjšal.
Volume (kg WFE)
Med letoma 2010 in 2011 se je povečal, vendar se je ponovno zmanjšal v letu 2012 in v obdobju preiskave.
Average price (EUR/kg WFE)
Na splošno se je tržni delež tretjih držav v obravnavanem obdobju nekoliko povečal, in sicer s 2,4 % na 2,7 %.
The import volume from all other third countries was at a low level and even decreased slightly during the period considered.
Hkrati je bil uvoz iz Turčije na veliko višji ravni tako v smislu obsega kot tudi tržnih deležev, zanj pa je bil značilen stalen trend naraščanja.
It increased between 2010 and 2011, but decreased subsequently and reached slightly lower volumes during the investigation period than at the beginning of the period considered in 2010.
V obravnavanem obdobju so se povprečne uvozne cene povečevale.
Market share followed a similar trend.
V obravnavanem obdobju so se povprečne uvozne cene vsega skupaj povišale za 12 %.
It increased between 2010 and 2011, but decreased again in 2012 and the investigation period.
Uvozne cene iz drugih tretjih držav so bile nižje od povprečnih prodajnih cen na enoto vzorčenih proizvajalcev Unije, vendar višje od turških uvoznih cen, razen v letu 2012, ko so bile nekoliko nižje.
Overall, their market share increased slightly from 2,4 % to 2,7 % during the period considered.
Glede na nizek in stabilen obseg uvoza ter majhne in precej stabilne tržne deleže iz vseh drugih tretjih držav ter glede na njihove ravni cen, ki so sledile splošnim ravnem cen v Uniji, je Komisija v tej fazi sklenila, da uvoz iz drugih tretjih držav ni prispeval k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
At the same time the imports from Turkey were at much higher level both in terms of volume and market shares and showed a constant increasing trend.
Obseg izvoza industrije Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju gibal na naslednji način:
Average import prices were increasing over the period considered.
Preglednica 12
In total average import prices increased by 12 % over the period considered.
Izvoz proizvajalcev Unije
Import prices from other third countries were lower than the average unit sales prices of the sampled Union producers but higher than the Turkish import prices, except in 2012 where they were slightly lower.
Obseg izvoza (v kg WFE)
In view of the low and stable import volumes as well as the low and rather stable market shares from all other third countries and their price levels that followed overall price levels in the Union, the Commission concluded at this stage that the other third country imports did not contribute to the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Izvoz industrije Unije se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 25 %.
The volume of exports of the Union industry developed over the period considered as follows:
Vendar je trg Unije glavni trg za industrijo Unije, poleg tega je njen izvoz v obdobju 2010–2011 predstavljal le približno 3 % njene proizvodnje, v obdobju preiskave pa približno 5 %.
Table 12
Izvozne prodajne cene industrije Unije so bile za približno 30 % višje od povprečnih prodajnih cen v Uniji, s čimer so bili ustvarjeni večji dobički kot pri prodaji na trgu Unije.
Export performance of the Union producers
Zato je Komisija v tej fazi sklenila, da izvoz industrije Unije ni prekinil vzročne zveze med subvencioniranim uvozom in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Export volume (kg WFE)
Potrošnja Unije je bila stabilna med letoma 2010 in 2011, med letom 2011 in obdobjem preiskave se je zmanjšala za 12 %, na splošno pa se je zmanjšala za 12 %.
Export sales of the Union industry increased by 25 % during the period considered.
Vendar pa je v razmerah zmanjšane potrošnje subvencioniranemu uvozu iz Turčije uspelo povečati tržni delež za 8 odstotnih točk ali 95 %, medtem ko je industrija Unije izgubila tržni delež prav tako v višini 8 odstotnih točk.
However, the Union market is the main market for the Union industry and its exports constituted only around 3 % of its production in 2010-2011 and around 5 % in the investigation period.
Zato zmanjšanja obsega prodaje in izgube tržnega deleža industrije Unije ni mogoče razložiti samo s splošnim zmanjšanjem potrošnje.
Export sales prices of the Union industry were by around 30 % higher than their average sales price in the Union, generating higher profits than sales on the Union market.
Zato je stalno povečevanje subvencioniranega uvoza na vedno manjšem trgu po cenah, ki so nelojalno nižale prodajne cene industrije Unije na trgu Unije, povzročilo škodo neodvisno in imelo pri tem odločilno vlogo, kot je ugotovljeno v uvodni izjavi 160.
On these grounds, the Commission concluded at this stage that the export performance of the Union industry did not break the causal link between the subsidised imports and the injury suffered by the Union industry.
Na podlagi navedenega je Komisija v tej fazi sklenila, da bi zmanjšanje potrošnje sicer lahko prispevalo k škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, vendar pa samo z zmanjšanjem potrošnje ni mogoče pojasniti škode, ki jo je ta utrpela, zato zmanjšanje potrošnje ne more prekiniti vzročne zveze med subvencioniranim uvozom in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije.
Union consumption remained stable from 2010 to 2011 and decreased by 12 % between 2011 and the investigation period, overall it decreased by 12 %.
Egejsko združenje izvoznikov je trdilo, da je znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, povzročila konkurenca z drugimi vrstami rib, kot so vitki somi, velike amerikanke in lososi.
In the context of decreasing consumption however the subsidised Turkish imports managed to increase their market share by 8 percentage points or 95 % while the Union industry lost a market share of as well 8 percentage points.
Kar zadeva vitke some, se je uvoz v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za približno 24 %.
Therefore, the loss in sales volume and market share from the Union industry could not be solely explained by the overall decrease in consumption.
To je v nasprotju s povečanjem uvoza zadevnega izdelka v istem obdobju.