natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The technical file accompanying the ‘EC’ declaration of verification should be updated if additional verifications are carried out (e.g. verification of conformity with national rules for obtaining additional authorisation for placing in service).
Vsak proizvajalec, vzdrževalec, imetnik vagonov, izvajalec storitev in oskrbovalna služba mora zagotoviti, da so njihova tirna vozila, objekti in naprave, dodatki in oprema ter storitve v skladu z bistvenimi zahtevami in da so v tehnični dokumentaciji, priloženi ES-izjavi o verifikaciji, navedeni pogoji za uporabo, tako da jih lahko prevoznik v železniškem prometu in/ali upravljavec železniške infrastrukture varno uporablja.
In the case of an additional authorisation, the applicant should inform the national safety authority that issued the first authorisation.
Prosilec za dovoljenje za podsistem, ki izda ES-izjavo o verifikaciji, je edini odgovoren za zagotovitev, da podsistemi v njihovem stanju načrtovanega delovanja ob izdaji dovoljenja v celoti in do najmanjših podrobnosti izpolnjujejo bistvene zahteve vse veljavne zakonodaje EU.
‘EC’ DECLARATION OF VERIFICATION
Prosilec na podlagi verifikacije priglašenega ali pristojnega organa in, po potrebi, celovite ocene podsistema ali vozila poda izjavo, da so vse bistvene zahteve izpolnjene.
According to Article 15 of Directive 2008/57/EC and Article 4(3) and (4) of Directive 2004/49/EC, it is the responsibility of the railway undertakings or infrastructure managers to ensure that a vehicle or subsystem meets all the essential requirements when it is in use.
Prosilec, ki je podpisal zadevno ES-izjavo o verifikaciji, mora zato v primeru poznejših dvomov glede skladnosti stanja načrtovanega delovanja podsistema z bistvenimi zahtevami v času izdaje dovoljenja prevzeti glavno odgovornost.
This is without prejudice to the responsibility of the other players involved (e.g. the responsibilities of the signatory of the ‘EC’ declaration of verification).
Posledično dovoljenje za tip vozila ali dovoljenje za začetek obratovanja ne sme veljati za prenos odgovornosti zagotavljanja ali preverjanja, da podsistem izpolnjuje vse bistvene zahteve, s prosilca na nacionalni varnostni organ, ki izda dovoljenje.
Each manufacturer, maintenance supplier, wagon keeper, service provider and procurement entity must ensure that rolling stock, installations, accessories and equipment and services supplied by them comply with the essential requirements and that the conditions for use are specified in the technical file accompanying the EC declaration of verification so that they can be safely put into operation by the railway undertaking and/or infrastructure manager.
Če se pojavijo pomisleki glede skladnosti podsistema z bistvenimi zahtevami v njegovem stanju načrtovanega delovanja, mora nacionalni varnostni organ, ki izda dovoljenje, odgovarjati samo za posebne naloge, ki so v skladu s členom 16 Direktive 2004/49/ES dodeljene nacionalnemu varnostnemu organu, ki izda dovoljenje ali ima nadzorno vlogo.
The responsibility for ensuring that the essential requirements of all applicable EU legislation are fully met in every detail by the subsystems in their design operating state at authorisation rests only with the applicant for authorisation of a subsystem, who issues the ‘EC’ declaration of verification.
To načelo se mora v skladu s priporočili od 58 do 62 in 67 izražati v nacionalni zakonodaji.
On the basis of the verification by the notified body or designated body and, where applicable, an overall assessment of the subsystem or vehicle, the applicant declares that all essential requirements are fulfilled.
Prosilec podpiše ES-izjavo o verifikaciji izključno na svojo odgovornost in neodvisno od preverjanja skladnosti s TSI in nacionalnimi predpisi ter preverjanjem varne vključitve, izvedenega v skladu s členom 15(1) Direktive 2008/57/ES.
Therefore, if the compliance of the subsystem in its design operating state with the essential requirements at the time of authorisation is called into question at a later stage, the applicant, who has signed the relevant ‘EC’ declaration of verification should be considered as bearing the primary responsibility.
Zato mora imeti prosilec vzpostavljen postopek, ki mu zagotavlja, da zajame in izpolnjuje vse bistvene zahteve ter upošteva vso veljavno zakonodajo EU.
As a consequence, neither a type authorisation nor an authorisation for placing in service should be considered as handover of the responsibility to ensure or verify that the subsystem meets all essential requirements from the applicant to the authorising national safety authority.
Čeprav skupna varnostna metoda za ovrednotenje in oceno tveganja prvotno ni bila razvita v ta namen, se prosilec lahko odloči, da to metodologijo uporabi kot orodje, s katerim bo izpolnil del svoje odgovornosti zagotavljanja, da vsi deli podsistema/vozila v vseh pogledih in do najmanjših podrobnosti ustrezajo bistvenim zahtevam za železniški sistem iz Priloge III k Direktivi 2008/57/ES.
If the compliance with the essential requirements of a subsystem in its design operating state is called into question, the authorising national safety authority should only be held accountable for the specific tasks allocated by Article 16 of Directive 2004/49/EC to the authorising or supervising national safety authority.
Prosilec lahko za to, da zagotovi, da vsi deli podsistema ali vozila izpolnjujejo bistvene zahteve za železniški sistem, izbere tudi kateri koli drugi način, ki ga dovoljuje zadevna zakonodaja.
The national law should reflect this principle in line with recommendations 58 to 62 and 67.
ES-izjava o verifikaciji zajema vso veljavno zakonodajo EU.
Independently from the verification of compliance with TSIs and national rules and the verification of safe integration carried out under Article 15(1) of Directive 2008/57/EC, the applicant signs the ‘EC’ declaration of verification on his sole responsibility.
Za skladnost s to zakonodajo, vključno s pripadajočo oceno skladnosti, in, po potrebi, za sodelovanje ocenjevalnih organov, ki jih zahteva ta zakonodaja, je odgovoren podpisnik ES-izjave.
Therefore, the applicant should have a process in place to make sure that it has captured and fulfilled all the essential requirements and complied with all applicable EU legislation.
Pri izdaji dovoljenja za vozila ali projekt omrežja, ki so sestavljeni iz več kot enega podsistema:
Although the CSM RA was originally not developed for that purpose, the applicant may choose to use the methodology in the CSM RA as a tool to fulfil part of his responsibility to ensure that all parts of the subsystem/vehicle meet in all respects and in every detail the essential requirements for the railway system set out in Annex III to Directive 2008/57/EC.
je lahko več prosilcev (po eden za vsak podsistem), pri čemer vsak izda ES-izjavo o verifikaciji za svoj del, vključno z njegovimi vmesniki.
Equally, the applicant may choose to use any other means allowed by the relevant legislation to ensure that all parts of the subsystem or vehicle meet the essential requirements for the railway system.
V tem primeru je vsak prosilec odgovoren za zadevni podsistem v skladu s področjem uporabe svoje ES-izjave o verifikaciji.
The ‘EC’ declaration of verification covers all applicable EU legislation.
Proizvajalec ali naročnik lahko pri vložitvi zahtevka za dovoljenje za vozilo ali projekt omrežja te izjave združi;
It is the responsibility of the signatory of the ‘EC’ declaration to comply with that legislation, including the corresponding conformity assessment and to involve, where necessary, assessment bodies required by that legislation.
proizvajalec ali naročnik, ki zaprosi za dovoljenje za tip vozila, posamezno vozilo ali projekt omrežja, lahko ES-izjave o verifikaciji za posamezne podsisteme, kot je opisano v Prilogi V k Direktivi 2008/57/ES, združi v eno ES-izjavo o verifikaciji za tip vozila, posamezno vozilo ali projekt omrežja.
In the case of an authorisation relating to vehicles or a network project consisting of more than one subsystem:
V tem primeru izključno na svojo odgovornost izjavlja, da so bili podsistemi, ki zajemajo zadevni tip vozila, posamezno vozilo ali projekt omrežja, obravnavani v ustreznih postopkih verifikacije in izpolnjujejo zahteve zadevne zakonodaje Evropske unije, vključno z vsemi veljavnimi nacionalnimi predpisi, in da torej vozilo ali projekt omrežja izpolnjuje zahteve zadevne zakonodaje Evropske unije, vključno z vsemi veljavnimi nacionalnimi predpisi.
there may be more than one applicant (one for each subsystem), each establishing an ‘EC’ declaration of verification for his part including its interfaces.
Zadevne TSI lahko delno skladnost s TSI za namene izdaje ES-izjave o verifikaciji dopuščajo samo, če zadevna TSI določa, da posebne funkcije, zmogljivosti in vmesniki, ki so potrebni za izpolnjevanje bistvenih zahtev, v določenih okoliščinah niso obvezni.
In this case each applicant takes responsibility for the relevant subsystem in accordance with the scope of his ‘EC’ declaration of verification.
Prosilec lahko pri pristojnem nacionalnem varnostnem organu uradno zaprosi za izdajo dovoljenja za začetek obratovanja podsistema šele takrat, ko so zbrani vsi predhodni dokazi in izjave.
A manufacturer or contracting entity may combine these two declarations in an application for a vehicle or network project;
Vendar za dobro prakso s strani prosilcev velja, da ti čim prej vzpostavijo neformalno sodelovanje z nacionalnimi varnostnimi organi, da bi zagotovili, da so postopek, zahteve, vloge in odgovornosti, področje uporabe ter omejitve in pogoji uporabe jasni ter da pozneje ni težav.
the manufacturer or contracting entity for the vehicle type, individual vehicle or network project may combine the ‘EC’ declarations of verification for each subsystem, as described in Annex V to Directive 2008/57/EC, into a single ‘EC’ declaration of verification for the vehicle type, individual vehicle or network project.
UPRAVLJANJE SPREMEMB
In this case he declares on his sole responsibility that the subsystems comprising the vehicle type, individual vehicle or network project concerned have been subject to the relevant verification procedures, and satisfy the requirements of the relevant European Union legislation including any applicable national rules and that the vehicle or network project itself therefore satisfies the requirements of the relevant European Union legislation including any applicable national rules.
Kar zadeva uporabo člena 5(2), člena 15(3) in člena 20 Direktive 2008/57/ES, je treba morebitno spremembo obstoječega strukturnega podsistema analizirati in razvrstiti v eno izmed naslednjih kategorij sprememb:
To the end of establishing an ‘EC’ declaration of verification, the relevant TSIs may allow partial conformity to a TSI only if the TSI itself provides that specific functions, performances and interfaces required to fulfil the essential requirements are not mandatory in specific circumstances.
„zamenjava v okviru vzdrževanja“ in druge spremembe, ki ne uvajajo odstopanja od tehnične dokumentacije, predložene ES-izjavi o verifikaciji.
Only when all the preceding evidence and declarations have been compiled is the applicant in a position to formally apply to the competent national safety authority for an authorisation for placing in service of the subsystem.
V tem primeru verifikacija ocenjevalnega organa ni potrebna, države članice ni treba obvestiti, prvotna ES-izjava o verifikaciji pa je še naprej veljavna in se ne spremeni;
However it is recognised as a good practice for applicants to engage informally with national safety authorities as early as possible so that the process, requirements, roles and responsibilities, scope of application and limitations and conditions of use are clear and that there are no difficulties at a later stage.
spremembe, ki uvajajo odstopanje od tehnične dokumentacije, predložene ES-izjavi o verifikaciji, in zaradi katerih so morda potrebni novi pregledi (in s tem tudi preverjanje v skladu z veljavnimi moduli za preverjanje skladnosti), vendar ne vplivajo na osnovne značilnosti zasnove podsistema.
MANAGEMENT OF MODIFICATIONS
V tem primeru je treba posodobiti tehnično dokumentacijo, predloženo ES-izjavi o verifikaciji, zadevne informacije pa je treba dati na voljo na zahtevo nacionalnega varnostnega organa;
Concerning the application of Articles 5(2), 15(3) and Article 20 of Directive 2008/57/EC, any modification of an existing structural subsystem should be analysed and categorised as only one of the following modifications:
obnova ali nadgradnja (tj. večje obnovitveno delo ali sprememba, o kateri je treba obvestiti državo članico), ki ne zahteva novega dovoljenja za začetek obratovanja;
‘Substitution in the framework of maintenance’ and other changes that do not introduce a deviation from the technical file accompanying the ‘EC’ declaration of verification.
v to kategorijo spadajo spremembe, ki vključujejo spremembo osnovnih značilnosti zasnove podsistema;
In this case there is no need for verification by an assessment body, the Member State does not need to be informed, and the initial ‘EC’ declaration of verification remains valid and unchanged;
obnova ali nadgradnja (tj. večje obnovitveno delo ali sprememba, o kateri je treba obvestiti državo članico), ki zahteva novo dovoljenje za začetek obratovanja.
Changes that introduce a deviation from the technical file accompanying the ‘EC’ declaration of verification which may require new checks (and therefore require verification according to the applicable conformity assessment modules) but do not have any impact on the basic design characteristics of the subsystem.
Opomniti je treba, da morajo biti odločitve naročnika ali proizvajalca o spremembah podsistema, ki temeljijo na štirih zgoraj omenjenih kategorijah, povsem neodvisne od odločitve glede pomembnosti spremembe za železniški sistem v smislu uredbe o skupni varnostni metodi za ovrednotenje in oceno tveganja, ki jo mora sprejeti prevoznik v železniškem prometu ali upravljavec železniške infrastrukture, ki opravi spremembo v svojem delu sistema.
In this case, the technical file accompanying the ‘EC’ declaration of verification needs to be updated, and the relevant information should be made available upon request by the national safety authority;
Pri odločitvah sodelujejo različni deležniki v različnih okoliščinah in z različnimi merili za odločanje.
Renewal or upgrading (i.e. a major substitution or change that requires informing the Member State) which do not require a new authorisation for the placing in service;
Kategoriji 3 in 4 uvajata odstopanje od tehnične dokumentacije, predložene ES-izjavi o verifikaciji, saj vplivata na osnovne značilnosti zasnove podsistema.
modifications that include a change in the basic design characteristics of the subsystem fall into this category;
TSI morajo zaradi pravne varnosti in vzajemnega priznavanja zagotoviti merila, s katerimi se določi, ali sprememba vpliva na osnovne značilnosti zasnove podsistema in ali spada v kategorijo 3 ali 4, in sicer tako za podsisteme, ki začnejo obratovati v skladu z Direktivo 2008/57/ES, kot tudi za podsisteme, ki so začeli obratovati prej.
Renewal or upgrading (i.e. a major substitution or change that requires informing the Member State) which require a new authorisation for placing in service.
Dokler teh meril ne zagotovijo TSI, jih lahko države članice določijo na nacionalni ravni.
It should be noted that decisions by a contracting entity or manufacturer on the changes of a subsystem based on the four categories above must be completely independent from the decision on the significance of a change in the meaning of the CSM RA to the railway system to be made by a railway undertaking or infrastructure manager making a change to their part of the system.
Ob izdaji dovoljenja je treba vedno upoštevati spremembe v zvezi s podsistemom ali vozilom.
The decisions involve different actors in different circumstances with different decision criteria.
Kopičenje manjših sprememb lahko privede do velike spremembe.
Categories 3 and 4 above introduce a deviation from the technical file accompanying the ‘EC’ declaration of verification with an impact on the basic design characteristics of the subsystem.
Proizvajalci ali naročniki morajo spremembe na obstoječih strukturnih podsistemih upravljati na podlagi naslednjega:
For both subsystems placed in service according to Directive 2008/57/EC and subsystem placed in service earlier for the sake of legal certainty and mutual recognition the TSIs should provide criteria to determine if a modification has an impact on the basic design characteristics of the subsystem and if it fits into category 3 or 4.
proizvajalec ali naročnik na podlagi priporočila 110 presodi, v katero kategorijo spada sprememba in ali je treba obvestiti organe za ocenjevanje skladnosti ali organe držav članic.
Until the TSIs provide these criteria, Member States may specify them on national level.
V primeru sprememb kategorij od 2 do 4 iz priporočila 110, katerih posledica je sprememba tehnične dokumentacije, predložene ES-izjavi o verifikaciji, ali ki vplivajo na veljavnost že izvedenih preverjanj, mora proizvajalec ali naročnik pri uvedbi spremembe oceniti potrebo po novi ES-izjavi o verifikaciji v skladu z merili iz točke 2 Priloge V k Direktivi 2008/57/ES [12].
The modification should always be considered by reference to the subsystem or vehicle at the moment of authorisation.
Pri spremembah kategorije 4 mora država članica določiti obseg uporabe TSI za projekt;
An accumulation of minor modifications may result in a major modification.
če TSI za določen parameter zahteva uporabo skupne varnostne metode za ovrednotenje in oceno tveganja, mora TSI navesti okoliščine, v katerih je treba opraviti preizkus pomembnosti za ta parameter;
The manufacturers or contracting entities should manage modifications to existing structural subsystems on the basis of the following:
podobno je treba pri parametrih, ki so pomembni za izvedbo varnega vključevanja kot del izdaje dovoljenja v skladu z zgornjim priporočilom 40, izvesti preizkus pomembnosti za vsakega od njih, pri čemer je treba upoštevati obseg spremembe, ki zadeva stanje načrtovanega delovanja.
On the basis of recommendation 110, the manufacturer or contracting entity evaluates to which category the change belongs and whether the conformity assessment bodies or Member State authorities need to be informed.
Vsak prevoznik v železniškem prometu in upravljavec železniške infrastrukture je odgovoren za svoj del železniškega sistema.
In the event of modifications of categories 2 to 4 of recommendation 110 resulting in an amendment of the technical file accompanying the ‘EC’ declaration of verification or affecting the validity of the verifications already carried out, the manufacturer or contracting entity, when introducing a change, should assess the need of a new ‘EC’ declaration of verification according to the criteria defined in paragraph 2 of Annex V to Directive 2008/57/EC [12].
V skladu s členom 4 Direktive 2004/49/ES morajo svoj del železniškega sistema upravljati s sistemom upravljanja varnosti.
For modifications in category 4, the Member State should decide to what extent the TSIs need to be applied to the project.
Sistem upravljanja varnosti mora, kjer je ustrezno, uporabljati skupno varnostno metodo za ovrednotenje in oceno tveganja.
Where the use of the CSM RA is required by a TSI for a particular parameter, the TSI should specify the circumstances in which a significance test is to be carried out in respect of this parameter.
Kadar prevoznik v železniškem prometu ali upravljavec železniške infrastrukture začne uporabljati vozilo ali podsistem, mora uporabiti skupno varnostno metodo za ovrednotenje in oceno tveganja, pri čemer mora začeti z oceno pomembnosti spremembe za del železniškega sistema, za katerega je odgovoren.
Similarly, for parameters which are relevant to perform the safe integration as part of authorisation according to recommendation 40 above, a significance test should be carried out for each parameter taking account of the extent of the change concerning the design operating state.
Kot del tega postopka morajo prevozniki v železniškem prometu in upravljavci železniške infrastrukture obravnavati naslednja vprašanja:
Railway undertakings and infrastructure managers are each responsible for their part of the railway system.
kar zadeva vozila ali podsisteme, ki jih je treba po spremembi (ponovno) začeti uporabljati, in, kadar je ustrezno, dovoljenje:
In accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2004/49/EC, they should manage their part of the railway system using an SMS.
prevozniki v železniškem prometu in upravljavci železniške infrastrukture morajo s svojimi sistemi upravljanja varnosti oceniti, ali ponovni začetek uporabe vozila ali podsistema pomeni veliko spremembo za železniški sistem kot celoto;
The SMS should, where appropriate, make use of the CSM RA.
kar zadeva spremembe v delovanju podsistema ali vozila:
When a railway undertaking or infrastructure manager brings a vehicle or subsystem into use, it must use the CSM RA starting with an assessment of the significance of the change to the part of the railway system for which it is responsible.
prevozniki v železniškem prometu in upravljavci železniške infrastrukture morajo oceniti, ali je sprememba pomembna, kar zadeva njihov sistem upravljanja varnosti, in, če je pomembna, ali je nadzorovanje vseh zadevnih tveganj zajeto v sistem upravljanja varnosti oziroma je treba tega prilagoditi;
As part of this process, railway undertakings and infrastructure managers should address the following questions:
kar zadeva spremembe pri vzdrževanju podsistema ali vozila:
concerning vehicles or subsystems to be brought (back) into use after modification and, where required, authorisation:
prevozniki v železniškem prometu in upravljavci železniške infrastrukture morajo s svojimi sistemi upravljanja varnosti oceniti, ali je sprememba pomembna, in, če je pomembna, poskrbeti za ustrezno prilagoditev sistemov vzdrževanja subjektov, zadolženih za vzdrževanje, in sistemov upravljanja varnosti prevoznikov v železniškem prometu in upravljavcev železniške infrastrukture.
railway undertaking and infrastructure managers should assess using their SMS whether the bringing into use of the vehicle or subsystem represents a change which is significant for the railway system as a whole;
Nacionalni varnostni organi morajo spremembe, ki se uvajajo v obratujoče podsisteme, nadzirati z nadzorovanjem varnostnih pooblastil in varnostnih spričeval upravljavcev železniške infrastrukture oziroma prevoznikov v železniškem prometu.
concerning any change to the operation of a subsystem or vehicle:
V ta namen morajo nadzorovati, ali se alinee (a), (b) in (c) priporočila 115 pravilno uporabljajo.
railway undertaking and infrastructure managers should assess whether the change is significant in respect to their SMS and, if it is significant, whether the control of all relevant risks is covered by the SMS or the SMS needs to be adapted;
Priporočilo 2011/217/EU se razveljavi.
concerning any changes to the maintenance of a subsystem or vehicle:
To priporočilo je naslovljeno na države članice.
railway undertakings and infrastructure managers should assess using their SMS whether the change is significant and if it significant ensure that the systems of maintenance of ECMs and SMS of the railway undertaking and infrastructure manager are appropriately adapted.
V Bruslju, 5. decembra 2014
The national safety authorities should supervise the changes introduced in the subsystems in service through the supervision of the safety authorisations and safety certificates of the infrastructure managers and railway undertakings respectively.
Za Komisijo
For this the national safety authorities should supervise if indent (a), (b) and (c) of recommendation 115 is applied correctly.
Violeta Bulc
Recommendation 2011/217/EU is repealed.
Članica Komisije
This Recommendation is addressed to the Member States.
Direktiva 2008/57/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o interoperabilnosti železniškega sistema v Skupnosti (UL L 191, 18.7.2008, str.