natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With a view to an appropriate integration of environmental, social and labour requirements into public procurement procedures it is of particular importance that Member States and contracting authorities take relevant measures to ensure compliance with obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law that apply at the place where the works are executed or the services provided and result from laws, regulations, decrees and decisions, at both national and Union level, as well as from collective agreements, provided that such rules, and their application, comply with Union law.
Zaradi ustrezne vključitve okoljskih in socialnih zahtev ter zahtev s področja dela v postopke javnega naročanja je nadvse pomembno, da države članice in javni naročniki z ustreznimi ukrepi zagotovijo, da so izpolnjene obveznosti na področju okoljskega, socialnega in delovnega prava, ki velja na kraju izvajanja gradenj ali opravljanja storitev in ki izhajajo iz zakonov, uredb, odredb in sklepov, sprejetih na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Unije, pa tudi iz kolektivnih pogodb, če so takšna pravila in njihova uporaba skladna s pravom Unije.
Equally, obligations stemming from international agreements ratified by all Member States and listed in Annex X should apply during contract performance.
Pri izvajanju naročila bi bilo treba spoštovati tudi obveznosti, ki izvirajo iz mednarodnih sporazumov, ki so jih ratificirale vse države članice in so navedeni v Prilogi X.
The relevant measures should be applied in conformity with the basic principles of Union law, in particular with a view to ensuring equal treatment.
Zadevne ukrepe bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z osnovnimi načeli prava Unije, zlasti da se zagotovi enaka obravnava.
Such relevant measures should be applied in accordance with Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [11] and in a way that ensures equal treatment and does not discriminate directly or indirectly against economic operators and workers from other Member States.(38) Services should be considered to be provided at the place at which the characteristic performances are executed.
Takšne zadevne ukrepe bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 96/71/ES [11] in na način, ki ni neposredno ali posredno diskriminatoren do gospodarskih subjektov in delavcev iz drugih držav članic.(38) Treba bi bilo šteti, da se storitve opravljajo na kraju, na katerem se izvajajo značilne naloge.
When services are provided at a distance, for example services provided by call centres, those services should be considered to be provided at the place where the services are executed, irrespective of the places and Member States to which the services are directed.
Če se storitve opravljajo na daljavo, kot na primer storitve klicnih centrov, bi bilo treba šteti, da se opravljajo na kraju, na katerem se storitve izvajajo, ne glede na kraje in države članice, ki so jim storitve namenjene.
The relevant obligations could be mirrored in contract clauses.
Zadevne obveznosti bi se lahko odražale v določbah pogodb o izvedbi javnega naročila.
It should also be possible to include clauses ensuring compliance with collective agreements in compliance with Union law in public contracts.
Prav tako bi moralo biti možno v pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila vključiti določbe za zagotavljanje spoštovanja kolektivnih pogodb v skladu s pravom Unije.
Non-compliance with the relevant obligations could be considered to be grave misconduct on the part of the economic operator concerned, liable to exclusion of that economic operator from the procedure for the award of a public contract.
Neizpolnjevanje zadevnih obveznosti bi se lahko obravnavalo kot huda kršitev s strani zadevnega gospodarskega subjekta, zaradi katere je lahko ta gospodarski subjekt izključen iz postopka javnega naročanja.
Control of the observance of the environmental, social and labour law provisions should be performed at the relevant stages of the procurement procedure, when applying the general principles governing the choice of participants and the award of contracts, when applying the exclusion criteria and when applying the provisions concerning abnormally low tenders.
Nadzor nad spoštovanjem določb okoljskega, socialnega in delovnega prava bi bilo treba izvajati v zadevnih fazah postopka javnega naročanja, in sicer pri uporabi splošnih načel, ki urejajo izbor udeležencev in oddajo javnih naročil, pri uporabi razlogov za izključitev in pri uporabi določb v zvezi z neobičajno nizkimi ponudbami.
The necessary verification for that purpose should be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of this Directive, in particular those governing means of proof and self-declarations.
Preverjanje, potrebno v ta namen, bi bilo treba izvajati v skladu z ustreznimi določbami te direktive, zlasti določbami, ki urejajo dokazila in lastne izjave.
Nothing in this Directive should prevent the imposition or enforcement of measures necessary to protect public policy, public morality, public security, health, human and animal life, the preservation of plant life or other environmental measures, in particular with a view to sustainable development, provided that those measures are in conformity with the TFEU.
Nobena določba v tej direktivi ne bi smela preprečiti uvedbe ali uveljavitve ukrepov, potrebnih za varovanje javnega reda, javne morale, javne varnosti, zdravja, življenja ljudi in živali, ohranitve rastlinskega življenja ali drugih okoljskih ukrepov, zlasti zaradi trajnostnega razvoja, če so ti ukrepi v skladu s PDEU.
There is a great need for contracting authorities to have additional flexibility to choose a procurement procedure, which provides for negotiations.
Pri javnih naročnikih obstaja izjemna potreba po večji prožnosti pri izbiri takega postopka javnega naročanja, ki omogoča pogajanja.
A greater use of those procedures is also likely to increase cross-border trade, as the evaluation has shown that contracts awarded by negotiated procedure with prior publication have a particularly high success rate of cross-border tenders.
Pogostejša uporaba teh postopkov bi verjetno tudi povečala obseg čezmejne trgovine, saj je ocena pokazala, da imajo javna naročila, oddana po postopku s pogajanji po predhodni objavi, posebej visoko stopnjo uspešnosti čezmejnih ponudb.
Member States should be able to provide for the use of the competitive procedure with negotiation or the competitive dialogue, in various situations where open or restricted procedures without negotiations are not likely to lead to satisfactory procurement outcomes.
Države članice bi morale v različnih situacijah zagotoviti uporabo konkurenčnega postopka s pogajanji ali konkurenčnega dialoga, če ni verjetno, da bi odprt ali omejen postopek brez pogajanj prinesel zadovoljive rezultate na področju javnega naročanja.
It should be recalled that use of the competitive dialogue has significantly increased in terms of contract values over the past years.
Spomniti bi bilo treba, da se je uporaba konkurenčnega dialoga v preteklih letih izjemno povečala glede na vrednosti javnih naročil.
It has shown itself to be of use in cases where contracting authorities are unable to define the means of satisfying their needs or of assessing what the market can offer in terms of technical, financial or legal solutions.
Konkurenčni dialog se je izkazal za uporabnega v primerih, ko javni naročniki ne morejo opredeliti sredstev za zadovoljitev svojih potreb ali presoditi, kaj lahko ponudi trg glede tehničnih, finančnih ali pravnih rešitev.
This situation may arise in particular with innovative projects, the implementation of major integrated transport infrastructure projects, large computer networks or projects involving complex and structured financing.
Take razmere se lahko pojavijo zlasti pri inovativnih projektih, izvajanju pomembnih projektov na področju integrirane prometne infrastrukture, projektov za velika računalniška omrežja ali projektov, ki vključujejo kompleksno in strukturirano financiranje.
Where relevant, contracting authorities should be encouraged to appoint a project leader to ensure good cooperation between the economic operators and the contracting authority during the award procedure.
Javne naročnike bi bilo treba po potrebi spodbujati k imenovanju vodje projekta, ki bi zagotavljal dobro sodelovanje med gospodarskimi subjekti in javnim naročnikom v postopku javnega naročanja.
For works contracts, such situations include works that are not standard buildings or where works includes design or innovative solutions.
Pri javnih naročilih gradenj taki primeri vključujejo gradnje, ki niso standardne stavbe, ali gradnje, ki zajemajo projektne ali inovativne rešitve.
For services or supplies that require adaptation or design efforts, the use of a competitive procedure with negotiation or competitive dialogue is likely to be of value.
Za storitve ali blago, pri katerih so potrebna prilagoditvena ali projektna dela, bi lahko bil uporaben konkurenčni postopek s pogajanji ali konkurenčni dialog.
Such adaptation or design efforts are particularly necessary in the case of complex purchases such as sophisticated products, intellectual services, for example some consultancy services, architectural services or engineering services, or major information and communications technology (ICT) projects.
Taka prilagoditvena ali projektna dela so zlasti potrebna pri kompleksnih nabavah, na primer visoko razvitih proizvodov, intelektualnih storitev, kot so denimo določene storitve svetovanja, arhitekturne ali inženirske storitve, ali pomembnih projektov na področju informacijsko-komunikacijske tehnologije (IKT).
In those cases, negotiations may be necessary to guarantee that the supply or service in question corresponds to the needs of the contracting authority.
V teh primerih bodo morda potrebna pogajanja, s katerimi se zagotovi, da zadevno blago ali storitve ustrezajo potrebam javnega naročnika.
In respect of off-the-shelf services or supplies that can be provided by many different operators on the market, the competitive procedure with negotiation and competitive dialogue should not be used.
Za standardne storitve ali blago, ki jih lahko zagotovijo številni gospodarski subjekti na trgu, se konkurenčni postopek s pogajanji in konkurenčni dialog ne bi smela uporabljati.
The competitive procedure with negotiation should also be available in cases where an open or restricted procedure resulted only in irregular or unacceptable tenders.
Konkurenčni postopek s pogajanji bi moral biti na voljo tudi v primerih, ko se v odprtem ali omejenem postopku oddajo le nepravilne ali nesprejemljive ponudbe.
In such cases, contracting authorities should be allowed to conduct negotiations with the aim of obtaining regular and acceptable tenders.
V takih primerih bi bilo javnim naročnikom treba omogočiti, da izvedejo pogajanja za pridobitev pravilnih in sprejemljivih ponudb.
The competitive procedure with negotiation should be accompanied by adequate safeguards ensuring observance of the principles of equal treatment and transparency.
Konkurenčni postopek s pogajanji bi morala spremljati ustrezna jamstva glede upoštevanja načel enake obravnave in transparentnosti.
In particular, contracting authorities should indicate beforehand the minimum requirements which characterise the nature of the procurement and which should not be changed in the negotiations.
Javni naročnik bi moral vnaprej zlasti določiti minimalne zahteve, ki opredeljujejo vrsto javnega naročila in se med pogajanji ne bi smele spreminjati.
Award criteria and their weighting should remain stable throughout the entire procedure and should not be subject to negotiations, in order to guarantee equal treatment of all economic operators.
Merila za oddajo naročila in njihovi ponderji bi morali med trajanjem postopka ostati enaki in ne bi smeli biti predmet pogajanj, da bi tako zagotovili enako obravnavo vseh gospodarskih subjektov.
Negotiations should aim at improving the tenders so as to allow contracting authorities to buy works, supplies and services perfectly adapted to their specific needs.
Pogajanja bi morala biti usmerjena v izboljšanje ponudb, da bi javni naročniki lahko naročili gradnje, blago ali storitve, popolnoma prilagojene njihovim konkretnim potrebam.
Negotiations may concern all characteristics of the purchased works, supplies and services including, for instance, quality, quantities, commercial clauses as well as social, environmental and innovative aspects, in so far as they do not constitute minimum requirements.
Pogajanja lahko zadevajo vse značilnosti naročenih gradenj, blaga in storitev, med drugim na primer kakovost, količino, trgovinske klavzule ter družbene, okoljske in inovacijske vidike, kolikor niso del minimalnih zahtev.
It should be clarified that the minimum requirements to be set by the contracting authority are those conditions and characteristics (particularly physical, functional and legal) that any tender should meet or possess in order to allow the contracting authority to award the contract in accordance with the chosen award criteria.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da so minimalne zahteve, ki jih mora določiti javni naročnik, tisti pogoji ter značilnosti (zlasti fizični, funkcionalni in pravni), ki bi jih morala izpolnjevati ali imeti vsaka ponudba, da se zagotovi, da lahko javni naročnik odda javno naročilo v skladu z izbranimi merili za oddajo naročila.
In order to ensure transparency and traceability of the process, all stages should be duly documented.
Vse faze postopka bi bilo treba ustrezno dokumentirati, da se zagotovita transparentnost in sledljivost.
Furthermore, all tenders throughout the procedure should be submitted in writing.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba vse ponudbe med postopkom predložiti v pisni obliki.
Contracting authorities should be allowed to shorten certain deadlines applicable to open and restricted procedures and to competitive procedures with negotiation where the deadlines in question would be impracticable because of a state of urgency which should be duly substantiated by the contracting authorities.
Javni naročniki bi morali imeti možnost, da skrajšajo nekatere roke, ki veljajo za odprte in omejene postopke in za konkurenčne postopke s pogajanji, če zadevnih rokov zaradi nujnosti, ki bi jo morali javni naročniki ustrezno upravičiti, ne bi bilo mogoče upoštevati.
It should be clarified that this need not be an extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable for and not attributable to the contracting authority.
Treba bi bilo pojasniti, da ni potrebno, da bi bili to skrajno nujni primeri, do katerih pride zaradi dogodkov, ki jih javni naročnik ni mogel predvideti in mu zanje ni mogoče pripisati odgovornosti.
Research and innovation, including eco-innovation and social innovation, are among the main drivers of future growth and have been put at the centre of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
Raziskave in inovacije, vključno z ekološkimi in socialnimi inovacijami, so med glavnimi gibali prihodnje rasti in v središču strategije Evropa 2020 za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast.
Public authorities should make the best strategic use of public procurement to spur innovation.
Javni organi bi morali zagotoviti najboljšo strateško uporabo javnih naročil za spodbujanje inovacij.
Buying innovative products, works and services plays a key role in improving the efficiency and quality of public services while addressing major societal challenges.
Nabava inovativnega blaga, gradenj in storitev ima ključno vlogo pri povečanju učinkovitosti in kakovosti javnih storitev ter obravnavanju velikih družbenih izzivov.
It contributes to achieving best value for public money as well as wider economic, environmental and societal benefits in terms of generating new ideas, translating them into innovative products and services and thus promoting sustainable economic growth.
Prispeva k doseganju najboljšega razmerja med kakovostjo in ceno, plačano iz javnih sredstev, ter širših gospodarskih, okoljskih in družbenih koristi v smislu oblikovanja novih idej, njihovega spreminjanja v inovativne proizvode in storitve ter s tem spodbujanja trajnostne gospodarske rasti.
It should be recalled that a series of procurement models have been outlined in the Commission Communication of 14 December 2007 entitled ‘Pre-commercial Procurement: Driving innovation to ensure sustainable high quality public services in Europe’, which deals with the procurement of those R&D services not falling within the scope of this Directive.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba, da je bilo v Sporočilu Komisije z dne 14. decembra 2007 z naslovom „Predkomercialna naročila: spodbujanje inovacij za zagotavljanje visokokakovostnih trajnostnih javnih storitev v Evropi“, ki zadeva javno naročanje tistih raziskovalnih in razvojnih storitev, ki ne sodijo v področje uporabe te direktive, opredeljenih več modelov javnega naročanja.
Those models would continue to be available, but this Directive should also contribute to facilitating public procurement of innovation and help Member States in achieving the Innovation Union targets.
Ti modeli bi bili še naprej na voljo, a tudi ta direktiva bi morala prispevati k lažjemu javnemu naročanju na področju inovacij in državam članicam pomagati pri doseganju ciljev Unije inovacij.
Because of the importance of innovation, contracting authorities should be encouraged to allow variants as often as possible.
Zaradi pomembnosti inovacij bi bilo javne naročnike treba spodbujati, da variantne ponudbe dovolijo čim pogosteje.
The attention of those authorities should consequently be drawn to the need to define the minimum requirements to be met by variants before indicating that variants may be submitted.
Zato bi bilo te naročnike treba opozoriti, da morajo pred navedbo, da so variantne ponudbe dovoljene, opredeliti minimalne zahteve, ki jih morajo take ponudbe izpolnjevati.
Where a need for the development of an innovative product or service or innovative works and the subsequent purchase of the resulting supplies, services or works cannot be met by solutions already available on the market, contracting authorities should have access to a specific procurement procedure in respect of contracts falling within the scope of this Directive.
Če rešitve, ki na trgu že obstajajo, ne morejo zadostiti potrebi po razvoju inovativnega proizvoda, storitve ali gradnje ter po njeni naknadni nabavi, bi morali imeti javni naročniki dostop do posebnega postopka javnega naročanja, kar zadeva javna naročila, ki spadajo v področje uporabe te direktive.
This specific procedure should allow contracting authorities to establish a long-term innovation partnership for the development and subsequent purchase of a new, innovative product, service or works provided that such innovative product or service or innovative works can be delivered to agreed performance levels and costs, without the need for a separate procurement procedure for the purchase.
Ta posebni postopek bi moral javnim naročnikom omogočiti, da za razvoj in naknadno nabavo novega, inovativnega proizvoda, storitve ali gradnje sklenejo dolgoročno partnerstvo za inovacije, če se ta inovativni proizvod, storitev ali gradnja lahko zagotovi v skladu z dogovorjeno kakovostjo izvedbe in dogovorjenimi stroški, ne da bi bil za nabavo potreben ločen postopek javnega naročanja.
The innovation partnership should be based on the procedural rules that apply to the competitive procedure with negotiation and contracts should be awarded on the sole basis of the best price-quality ratio, which is most suitable for comparing tenders for innovative solutions.
Partnerstvo za inovacije bi moralo temeljiti na postopkovnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za konkurenčni postopek s pogajanji, javna naročila pa bi se morala oddati le na podlagi najboljšega razmerja med ceno in kakovostjo, kar je najprimernejše za primerjavo ponudb za inovativne rešitve.
Whether in respect of very large projects or smaller innovative projects, the innovation partnership should be structured in such a way that it can provide the necessary ‘market-pull’, incentivising the development of an innovative solution without foreclosing the market.
Partnerstvo za inovacije bi moralo biti pri zelo velikih ali pri manjših inovativnih projektih strukturirano tako, da bi lahko zagotovilo potrebno „povpraševanje trga“, ki bi spodbudilo razvoj inovativne rešitve brez zapiranja trga.
Contracting authorities should therefore not use innovation partnerships in such a way as to prevent, restrict or distort competition.
Javni naročniki zato ne bi smeli uporabljati partnerstev za inovacije tako, da bi preprečevali, omejevali ali izkrivljali konkurenco.
In certain cases, setting up innovation partnerships with several partners could contribute to avoiding such effects.
V nekaterih primerih bi sklenitev partnerstev za inovacije z več partnerji lahko prispevala k preprečevanju takšnih posledic.
In view of the detrimental effects on competition, negotiated procedures without prior publication of a contract notice should be used only in very exceptional circumstances.
Zaradi škodljivih učinkov na konkurenco bi se morali postopki s pogajanji brez predhodne objave obvestila o javnem naročilu uporabljati samo v zelo izjemnih okoliščinah.
This exception should be limited to cases where publication is either not possible, for reasons of extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable for and not attributable to the contracting authority, or where it is clear from the outset that publication would not trigger more competition or better procurement outcomes, not least because there is objectively only one economic operator that can perform the contract.
Ta izjema bi morala biti omejena na primere, v katerih objava ni mogoča zaradi skrajne nujnosti, nastale kot posledica dogodkov, ki jih javni naročnik ni mogel predvideti in mu zanje ni mogoče pripisati odgovornosti, ali v katerih je že na samem začetku jasno, da objava ne bo spodbudila konkurence ali boljših rezultatov naročanja, ne nazadnje zato, ker objektivno obstaja le en gospodarski subjekt, ki lahko izvede javno naročilo.
This is the case for works of art, where the identity of the artist intrinsically determines the unique character and value of the art object itself.
To velja za umetnine, pri katerih identiteta umetnika sama po sebi določa enkratnost in unikatno vrednost umetniškega predmeta.
Exclusivity can also arise from other reasons, but only situations of objective exclusivity can justify the use of the negotiated procedure without publication, where the situation of exclusivity has not been created by the contracting authority itself with a view to the future procurement procedure.
Za ekskluzivnost so lahko tudi drugi razlogi, a uporabo postopka s pogajanji brez objave lahko upraviči le objektivna ekskluzivnost, če ekskluzivnosti ni ustvaril javni naročnik sam zaradi prihodnjega postopka javnega naročanja.
Contracting authorities relying on this exception should provide reasons why there are no reasonable alternatives or substitutes such as using alternative distribution channels including outside the Member State of the contracting authority or considering functionally comparable works, supplies and services.
Javni naročniki, ki uporabijo to izjemo, bi morali navesti razloge, zakaj ni razumnih alternativ ali nadomestkov, kot na primer uporaba alternativnih distribucijskih kanalov, tudi zunaj države članice javnega naročnika, ali preučitev funkcionalno primerljivih gradenj, blaga in storitev.
Where the situation of exclusivity is due to technical reasons, they should be rigorously defined and justified on a case-by-case basis.
Če se ekskluzivnost pojavi zaradi tehničnih razlogov, bi bilo treba te razloge za vsak primer posebej natančno opredeliti in upravičiti.
They could include, for instance, near technical impossibility for another economic operator to achieve the required performance or the necessity to use specific know-how, tools or means which only one economic operator has at its disposal.
Ti razlogi bi denimo lahko vključevali skorajšnjo tehnično nemožnost, da bi zahtevano kakovost izvedbe dosegel kak drug gospodarski subjekt, ali potrebo po uporabi posebnega znanja, orodij ali sredstev, ki jih ima na razpolago le en gospodarski subjekt.