natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ten cooperating companies requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form within the given deadlines.
Deset sodelujočih družb je zahtevalo TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in v predpisanem roku izpolnilo obrazec zahtevka za TGO.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(d) of the basic Regulation, a MET verification was carried out to the companies which were included in the sample as well as to the company that was granted individual examination (see recital (48) below).
V skladu s členom 2(7)(d) osnovne uredbe je bilo preverjanje v zvezi s TGO opravljeno za družbe, ki so bile vključene v vzorec, in za družbo, ki ji je bila odobrena individualna preiskava (glej uvodno izjavo (48)).
It follows that a MET determination was made in respect of the following four companies or groups of companies.
Iz tega izhaja, da je bila TGO določena za naslednje štiri družbe ali skupine družb.
In case of related parties, the Commission shall examine whether the group of the related companies as a whole fulfils the conditions for MET.
V primeru povezanih strani Komisija preveri, ali skupina povezanih družb kot celota izpolnjuje pogoje za TGO.
Therefore, in cases where a subsidiary or any other company related to the applicant in the PRC is involved, directly or indirectly, in the production or sales of the product concerned, the MET examination is carried out in respect of each company individually as well as to the group of companies as a whole.
Zato se preiskava v zvezi s TGO, kadar je v proizvodnjo ali prodajo zadevnega izdelka neposredno ali posredno vključena podrejena družba ali katera koli druga družba, povezana z vlagateljem iz LRK, izvede za vsako družbo posebej in za skupino družb kot celoto.
Accordingly, the MET claims of four exporting producers (groups of companies), comprised of eleven legal entities, were investigated.
V skladu s tem so bili preiskani zahtevki za TGO štirih proizvajalcev izvoznikov (skupin družb), sestavljenih iz enajstih pravnih oseb.
The investigation established that all four exporting producers (groups of companies) claiming MET failed to demonstrate that they fulfilled all of the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Med preverjanjem je bilo ugotovljeno, da nobeden od štirih proizvajalcev izvoznikov (skupin družb), ki so zahtevali TGO, ni dokazal, da izpolnjuje vsa merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
More specifically, three exporting producers failed to demonstrate, either individually or as a group, that they had one set of clear set of accounts that were independently audited in line with international accounting standards and therefore did not fulfil MET criterion 2.
Natančneje, trije proizvajalci izvozniki, samostojno ali kot skupina, niso dokazali, da imajo jasno zbirko računovodskih izkazov, ki se revidirajo neodvisno in v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi, zato niso izpolnjevali merila št. 2 v zvezi s TGO.
Moreover, all four exporting producers, either individually or as a group, failed to demonstrate that they were not to subject to significant distortions carried over from the non-market economy system.
Poleg tega nobeden od štirih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, samostojno ali kot skupina, ni dokazal, da niso izpostavljeni znatnim izkrivljanjem, prenesenim iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
Accordingly, these companies, or group of companies, did not fulfil MET criterion 3.
Zato te družbe ali skupina družb ni izpolnjevala merila št. 3 v zvezi s TGO.
More specifically, all four exporting producers, or groups of exporting producers, benefitted from preferential tax regimes.
Natančneje, vsi štirje proizvajalci izvozniki ali skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov so uživali ugodnosti preferenčnih davčnih režimov.
In addition, one of these exporting producers also failed criterion 3 on the basis that several companies within the group, notwithstanding their dire financial situation, obtained significant financing during the IP (and before) at rates, which under conditions normally prevailing in a market economy, would be reserved for financially healthy companies.
Poleg tega eden od teh proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni izpolnjeval merila št. 3, in sicer na podlagi tega, da je več družb v skupini, ne glede na njihovo slabo finančno stanje, v OP (in pred tem) prejelo znatna finančna sredstva v obsegu, ki bi bil v razmerah, ki običajno prevladujejo v tržnem gospodarstvu, rezerviran za finančno stabilne družbe.
Another group of exporting producers also failed criterion 3 on the basis of the fact that companies within the group purchased natural gas at a reduced rate from a state-owned supplier.
Merila št. 3 ni izpolnjevala še ena skupina proizvajalcev izvoznikov, in sicer na podlagi dejstva, da so družbe v skupini nabavile zemeljski plin od državnega dobavitelja po znižani ceni.
The Commission disclosed the results of the MET investigation to the companies concerned, the authorities of the PRC and the complainant and invited them to comment.
Komisija je razkrila rezultate preiskave v zvezi s TGO zadevnim družbam, organom LRK in pritožniku ter jih pozvala k predložitvi pripomb.
The comments received were not such as to alter the Commission’s preliminary findings.
Prejete pripombe niso zadostovale za spremembo predhodnih ugotovitev Komisije.
After having consulted the Member States in accordance with Article 2(7) (c), all applicants were individually and formally notified, on 13 September 2013, of the Commission’s final determination with regard to their respective MET claim.
Vsi vložniki so bili 13. septembra 2013 po posvetovanju z državami članicami v skladu s členom 2(7)(c) individualno in uradno obveščeni o dokončni odločitvi Komisije v zvezi z njihovimi zahtevki za TGO.
Accordingly, neither of the four cooperating exporting producers or groups of exporting producers in the PRC that had requested MET could show that they fulfilled all the criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation and their MET claims were therefore rejected.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da nobeden od štirih sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz LRK, ki so zahtevali TGO, ni mogel dokazati, da izpolnjuje vsa merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, zato so bili njihovih zahtevki za TGO zavrnjeni.
One of the two exporting producers that had originally been included in the sample but subsequently excluded (see recital (18)) - had requested individual examination, pursuant to Article 17(3) of the basic Regulation, should it not be included in the sample.
Eden od dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki je bil sprva vključen v vzorec, pozneje pa izključen (glej uvodno izjavo (18)), je zahteval individualno preiskavo v skladu s členom 17(3) osnovne uredbe, če ne bi bil vključen v vzorec.
Following its exclusion from the sample and in view of the fact that an MET verification visit had already taken place (see recital (37) above), it was considered that it would not be unduly burdensome to grant this company individual examination (‘IE’).
Po njegovi izključitvi iz vzorca in ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je bil preveritveni obisk v zvezi s TGO že opravljen (glej uvodno izjavo (37)), je bilo ugotovljeno, da odobritev individualne preiskave za to družbo ne bi pomenila prevelikega bremena.
No other exporting producer, which was not included in the sample had requested IE.
Individualne preiskave ni zahteval noben drug proizvajalec izvoznik, ki ni bil vključen v vzorec.
In accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, the Commission envisaged in the notice of initiation that normal value should be determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country or, should an appropriate market economy third country not be found, the normal value should be established on the basis of Union prices in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe v obvestilu o začetku predvidela, da bi bilo treba normalno vrednost določiti na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom, če ne bi bilo mogoče najti primerne tretje države s tržnim gospodarstvom, pa na podlagi cen Unije v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Before resorting to Union prices the Commission would investigate all possibilities for selecting an appropriate analogue country.
Komisija bi pred uporabo cen Unije raziskala vse možnosti za izbiro primerne primerljive države.
Interested parties were invited to comment on the choice of an analogue country and on the use of Union prices.
Zainteresirane strani so bile pozvane, da predložijo pripombe o izbiri primerljive države in uporabi cen Unije.
Comments were received from the China Chamber of Commerce for Export/Import of Light Industrial Products and Arts-crafts (‘CCCLA’), from an unrelated importer, as well as from two Chinese exporting producers, which all contested the use of Union prices to establish the normal value.
Pripombe so predložili Kitajska trgovinska zbornica za uvoz in izvoz izdelkov lahke industrije in obrti („CCCLA“), nepovezani uvoznik ter dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika, vsi pa so nasprotovali uporabi cen Unije za določitev normalne vrednosti.
Turkey and India were put forward as appropriate analogue countries.
Kot primerni primerljivi državi sta bili predlagani Turčija in Indija.
Meanwhile, in order to investigate all possibilities for selecting an appropriate analogue country, the Commission services had identified eleven market economy third countries with possible production of solar glass and, based on publicly available information, invited 24 companies in those countries to cooperate with the Commission.
Medtem so službe Komisije, da bi proučile vse možnosti za izbiro primerne primerljive države, izbrale enajst tretjih držav s tržnim gospodarstvom in z morebitno proizvodnjo solarnega stekla ter na podlagi javno razpoložljivih informacij 24 družb iz teh držav povabile k sodelovanju s Komisijo.
These countries were: Australia, India, Indonesia, Japan, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey and the USA.
Te države so bile: Avstralija, Indija, Indonezija, Japonska, Saudova Arabija, Južna Afrika, Južna Koreja, Tajvan, Tajska, Turčija in ZDA.
Based on the information at the Commission’s disposal, apart from the PRC and the Union, only India and Turkey produce the like product.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih ima na voljo Komisija, poleg LRK in Unije podobni izdelek proizvajata le Indija in Turčija.
In order to make a proper assessment of the suitability of Turkey and India as appropriate analogue countries, the Commission analysed information concerning the like product and more specifically, the number of producers, the size of the domestic market, the level of imports and the importance of trade and non-trade barriers in both countries.
Da bi ustrezno ocenila ustreznost Turčije in Indije kot primernih primerljivih držav, je Komisija analizirala informacije o podobnem izdelku in natančneje o številu proizvajalcev, velikosti domačega trga, obsegu uvoza ter pomembnosti trgovinskih in netrgovinskih ovir v obeh državah.
However, only one company from Turkey came forward and expressed its willingness to cooperate with the Commission despite many attempts from the Commission to receive cooperation also from producers in India.
Vendar je svojo pripravljenost za sodelovanje s Komisijo izrazila le ena družba iz Turčije, kljub več poskusom Komisije, da bi vzpostavila sodelovanje tudi s proizvajalci iz Indije.
Turkey is a market economy third country.
Turčija je tretja država s tržnim gospodarstvom.
The import duties applicable to the like product are 3 % MFN.
Uvozne dajatve, ki se uporabljajo za podobni izdelek, zajemajo 3 % MFN.
Due to the Turkey-EU Customs Union import duties applicable bilaterally are 0 %.
Zaradi carinske unije med EU in Turčijo uvozne dajatve, ki se uporabljajo dvostransko, znašajo 0 %.
There seem to be no other duties or other significant non-trade barriers concerning the like product.
V zvezi s podobnim izdelkom ni drugih dajatev ali drugih bistvenih netrgovinskih ovir.
According to the Turkish producer that expressed its willingness to cooperate in the investigation, it is the sole company producing the like product in Turkey.
Turški proizvajalec, ki je izrazil pripravljenost za sodelovanje v preiskavi, naj bi bil edina družba, ki proizvaja podobni izdelek v Turčiji.
The company has significant production and is both exporting and selling domestically the like product with the export quantity being higher than the quantity sold domestically.
Družba proizvaja podobni izdelek v velikem obsegu in ga tako izvaža kot prodaja na domačem trgu, pri čemer obseg izvoza presega obseg prodaje na domačem trgu.
Notwithstanding the absence of trade and non-trade barriers, there were virtually no imports of solar glass on the Turkish market during the IP.
Ne glede na odsotnost trgovinskih in netrgovinskih ovir v OP na turškem trgu dejansko ni bilo uvoza solarnega stekla.
In the same time, the Commission’s investigation confirmed that the cooperating analogue country producer was making a reasonable and not an excessive profit during the IP.
Preiskava Komisije je istočasno potrdila, da je bil v OP dobiček sodelujočega proizvajalca iz primerljive države razumen in ne čezmeren.
Based on the above and considering all information available at this stage of the investigation, Turkey has provisionally been chosen as an analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega in ob upoštevanju vseh informacij, ki so na voljo v tej fazi preiskave, je bila Turčija začasno izbrana kot primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
In view of the fact that all requests for MET were denied, normal value for all Chinese exporting producers was established on the basis of information received from the producer in the analogue country, pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na to, da so bili vsi zahtevki za TGO zavrnjeni, je bila normalna vrednost za vse kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike določena na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložil proizvajalec v primerljivi državi, v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the sales of the like product in Turkey to independent customers were representative.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej proučila, ali je prodaja podobnega izdelka v Turčiji neodvisnim strankam reprezentativna.
The sales of the Turkish cooperating producer of the like product were found to be sold in representative quantities on the Turkish domestic market compared to the product concerned exported to the Union by the Chinese exporting producers included in the sample.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se podobni izdelek turškega sodelujočega proizvajalca na turškem domačem trgu prodaja v reprezentativnem obsegu v primerjavi z zadevnim izdelkom, ki ga v Unijo izvažajo kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, vključeni v vzorec.
The Commission subsequently examined whether these sales could be considered as having been made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je nato proučila, ali se lahko ta prodaja šteje za običajen potek trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
The sales transactions were considered profitable where the unit price was equal or above the cost of production.
Prodajni posli so veljali za dobičkonosne, če je bila cena za enoto enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje.
The cost of production of the Turkish producer during the IP was therefore determined.
Zato so bili določeni stroški proizvodnje turškega proizvajalca v OP.
For those product types where more than 80 % by volume of sales on the domestic market of the type in question were above cost and the weighted average sales price of that type was equal to or above the unit cost of production, normal value, by product type, was calculated as the weighted average of the actual domestic prices of all sales of the type in question, irrespective of whether those sales were profitable or not.
Za tiste vrste izdelkov, pri katerih je bilo več kot 80 % obsega prodaje vrste izdelka na domačem trgu prodanih po ceni, višji od stroškov, in pri katerih je bila tehtana povprečna prodajna cena navedene vrste izdelka enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto, je bila normalna vrednost po vrsti izdelka izračunana kot tehtano povprečje dejanskih domačih cen celotne prodaje zadevne vrste, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
Where the volume of profitable sales of a product type represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of that type, or where the weighted average price of that type was below the unit cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, which was calculated as a weighted average price of only the profitable domestic sales of that type made during the IP.
Kadar je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje vrste izdelka pomenil 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje navedene vrste izdelka ali kadar je bila tehtana povprečna cena navedene vrste izdelka nižja od stroškov proizvodnje na enoto, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtana povprečna cena zgolj dobičkonosne domače prodaje navedene vrste izdelka v OP.
As regards the types of product that were not profitable, normal value was constructed using the cost of manufacturing of the Turkish producer plus SG&A and profit for the product types of the Turkish producer that are profitable.
Za vrste izdelka, ki niso bile dobičkonosne, je bila normalna vrednost izračunana z uporabo proizvodnih stroškov turškega proizvajalca, ki so se jim prišteli prodajni, splošni in administrativni stroški ter dobiček v zvezi z dobičkonosnimi vrstami izdelka turškega proizvajalca.
Due to the lack of coating technology applied on the solar glass produced in Turkey during the IP and because none of the Turkish solar glass was produced using a float production process, there was no sale of several product types on the Turkish domestic market.
Zaradi pomanjkanja tehnologije premazov, ki bi se uporabljala za solarno steklo, proizvedeno v Turčiji v OP, in ker nobena vrsta turškega solarnega stekla ni bila proizvedena s proizvodnim procesom s plavajočo talino, se na turškem domačem trgu ni izvajala prodaja različnih vrst izdelka.
Therefore, for the product types which were not sold in Turkey during the IP but were exported from the PRC to the Union, the normal value had to be constructed pursuant to Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the Turkish analogue producer’s manufacturing costs plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs (‘SG&A’) and for profit.
Zato je bilo treba normalno vrednost za vrste izdelka, ki se v OP niso prodajale v Turčiji, ampak so se izvažale iz LRK v Unijo, v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe izračunati na osnovi proizvodnih stroškov primerljivega turškega proizvajalca, katerim je bil dodan razumen znesek za prodajne, splošne in upravne stroške („PSA“) ter za dobiček.
The cost of coating and the cost of the float production process were based on data provided by the Union Industry.
Stroški premazov in stroški proizvodnega procesa s plavajočo talino so temeljili na podatkih, ki jih je predložila industrija Unije.
The export prices were based on the prices actually paid or payable for the product concerned, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Izvozne cene so bile določene na podlagi cen, ki so se dejansko plačevale ali se plačujejo za zadevni izdelek, v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
The dumping margins were established by comparing the individual ex-works prices of the sampled exporters to the domestic sales prices of the analogue country producer or to the constructed normal value as appropriate.
Za določitev stopenj dampinga so bile posamezne cene franko tovarna vzorčenih izvoznikov primerjane z domačimi prodajnimi cenami proizvajalca iz primerljive države ali s konstruirano normalno vrednostjo, kjer je to ustrezno.
For the sampled exporting producers, the weighted average constructed normal value of each type of the like product in Turkey was compared with the weighted average export price of the corresponding product type, as provided for in Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
Za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike se je tehtana povprečna konstruirana normalna vrednost vsake vrste podobnega izdelka v Turčiji primerjala s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka v skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Articles 2(11) and 2(12) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margins for the sampled exporting producers and to the one granted IE were established on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average constructed normal value of each product type of the like product established in Turkey, with each company’s weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe so bile stopnje dampinga za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike in za proizvajalca izvoznika, ki mu je bila odobrena individualna preiskava, določene na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne konstruirane normalne vrednosti vsake vrste podobnega izdelka, določene za Turčijo, s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka vsake družbe, izraženo kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve.
With regard to all other exporting producers in the PRC, the dumping margin was established on the basis of the facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Za vse druge proizvajalce izvoznike iz LRK je bila stopnja dampinga določena na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
To this end the Commission determined the level of cooperation in the PRC.
V ta namen je Komisija določila raven sodelovanja v LRK.
The level of cooperation is the proportion of the volume of exports of the cooperating exporting producers to the Union towards the total export volume from the country concerned to the Union reported in the complaint (see recital (15) above).
Raven sodelovanja pomeni delež obsega izvoza sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Unijo od celotnega obsega izvoza iz zadevne države v Unijo, ki je bil prijavljen v pritožbi (glej uvodno izjavo (15)).
The level of cooperation is high since the imports of the cooperating exporting producers constitute more than 80 % of the total exports to the Union during the IP.
Raven sodelovanja je visoka, saj uvoz sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zajema več kot 80 % celotnega izvoza v Unijo v OP.
On this basis, the residual dumping margin applicable to all other exporting producers in the PRC was set at a level corresponding to the highest dumping margin found for the cooperating exporting producers in the sample.
Na podlagi tega je bila preostala stopnja dampinga, ki se uporablja za vse druge proizvajalce izvoznike iz LRK, določena na ravni, ki je ustrezala najvišji stopnji dampinga, ugotovljeni za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike v vzorcu.
The established provisional dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Union frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Ugotovljene začasne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Unije brez plačane dajatve, so naslednje:
Company with individual dumping margin
Družba z individualno stopnjo dampinga
Non-sampled cooperating companies for which a sample average will apply
Nevzorčene sodelujoče družbe, za katere se bo uporabljalo vzorčno povprečje
The like product was manufactured by eight producers in the Union during the IP.
Podobni izdelek je v OP proizvajalo osem proizvajalcev iz Unije.