natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the purposes of fulfilling its mandate, including its executive responsibilities, as set out in Article 3(a) and (d), EULEX KOSOVO shall support re-located judicial proceedings within a Member State, in order to prosecute and adjudicate criminal charges arising from the investigation into the allegations raised in a report entitled “Inhuman treatment of people and illicit trafficking in human organs in Kosovo” released on 12 December 2010 by the Special Rapporteur for the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Council of Europe.
EULEX KOSOVO pri izvajanju mandata, vključno z izvršilnimi pristojnostmi iz člena 3(a) in (d), podpira prenesene sodne postopke znotraj države članice, da bi zagotovili pregon in sojenje v kazenskih obtožbah, izhajajočih iz preiskave domnevnih kršitev, navedenih v poročilu 'Nečloveško ravnanje z ljudmi in nezakonita prodaja človeških organov na Kosovu', ki ga je 12. decembra 2010 predstavil posebni poročevalec Odbora Sveta Evrope za pravne zadeve in človekove pravice.
In Article 8(2), the following sentence is added:
v členu 16(1) se zadnji pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
In Article 16(1), the final subparagraph is replaced by the following:
v členu 18 se doda naslednji odstavek:
‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of EULEX KOSOVO from 15 October 2014 until 14 June 2015 shall be EUR 55820000.
Pooblastilo visokega predstavnika, da tretjim stranem in pristojnim lokalnim organom razkrije tajne podatke in dokumente EU, pripravljene za namene EULEX KOSOVO v skladu z odstavkoma 1 in 2, ne vključuje podatkov, zbranih zaradi sodnih postopov, ali dokumentov, pripravljenih zaradi teh postopkov, ki se izvajajo v okviru mandata EULEX KOSOVO.
In Article 18, the following paragraph is added:
„Veljati preneha 14. junija 2016.
The authorisation given to the High Representative to release to third parties and competent local authorities EU classified information and documents generated for the purposes of EULEX KOSOVO under paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not extend to information gathered or documents generated for the purpose of the judicial proceedings carried out within the framework of EULEX KOSOVO's mandate.
Svet na predlog visokega predstavnika in ob upoštevanju dodatnih virov financiranja ter prispevkov drugih partnerjev sprejme potrebne sklepe, s katerimi zagotovi, da mandat EULEX KOSOVO pri podpori prenesenim sodnim postopkom iz člena 3a in potrebna finančna sredstva ostanejo veljavni do zaključka teh sodnih postopkov.“
In Article 20, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:
Ta sklep začne veljati na dan sprejetja.
‘It shall expire on 14 June 2016.
V Bruslju, 29. septembra 2014
The Council, acting on a proposal from the High Representative, and considering complementary sources of funding as well as contributions from other partners, shall take the necessary decisions in order to ensure that EULEX KOSOVO's mandate in support of the re-located judicial proceedings referred to in Article 3a and the related necessary financial means shall remain in effect until such time as these judicial proceedings have been concluded.’ .
Za Svet
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
To poimenovanje ne posega v stališča o statusu ter je v skladu z RVSZN 1244(1999) in mnenjem Meddržavnega sodišča o razglasitvi neodvisnosti Kosova.
Done at Brussels, 29 September 2014.
Skupni ukrep Sveta 2008/124/SZVP z dne 4. februarja 2008 o misiji Evropske unije za krepitev pravne države na Kosovem, EULEX KOSOVO (UL L 42, 16.2.2008, str. 92).
For the Council
Sklep Sveta 2010/322/SZVP z dne 8. junija 2010 o spremembah in podaljšanju Skupnega ukrepa 2008/124/SZVP o misiji Evropske unije za krepitev pravne države na Kosovem, EULEX KOSOVO (UL L 145, 11.6.2010, str. 13).
The President
Sklep Sveta 2012/291/SZVP z dne 5. junija 2012 o spremembi in podaljšanju Skupnega ukrepa 2008/124/SZVP o misiji Evropske unije za krepitev pravne države na Kosovem, EULEX KOSOVO (UL L 146, 6.6.2012, str. 46).
This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244(1999) and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.
Sklep Sveta 2014/349/SZVP z dne 12. junija 2014 o spremembi Skupnega ukrepa 2008/124/SZVP o misiji Evropske unije za krepitev pravne države na Kosovem, EULEX KOSOVO (UL L 174, 13.6.2014, str. 42).
Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP of 4 February 2008 on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO (OJ L 42, 16.2.2008, p. 92).
Sodniki in tožilci, pristojni za te postopke, opravljajo svoje dolžnosti popolnoma neodvisno in avtonomno.“
Council Decision 2010/322/CFSP of 8 June 2010 amending and extending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO (OJ L 145, 11.6.2010, p. 13).
„Sodniki in tožilci EULEX KOSOVO so usposobljeni v skladu z najvišjimi strokovnimi standardi, kot je potrebno glede na kompleksnost zadeve, ki jo obravnavajo, in so imenovani po neodvisnem izbirnem postopku.“
Council Decision 2012/291/CFSP of 5 June 2012 amending and extending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO (OJ L 146, 6.6.2012, p. 46).
Referenčni finančni znesek za poznejše obdobje EULEX KOSOVO določi Svet.“
on State aid SA.33927 (12/C) (ex 11/NN)
o državni pomoči SA.33927 (12/C) (ex 11/NN), ki jo izvaja Belgija
implemented by Belgium — Guarantee scheme protecting the shares of individual members of financial cooperatives
Jamstvena shema, ki ščiti deleže posameznih članov finančnih zadrug
(notified under document C(2014) 1021)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014)1021)
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 108(2) PDEU,
By letter of 7 November 2011, the Belgian State notified the Commission that it had put in place a guarantee scheme (‘the cooperative guarantee scheme’ or ‘the measure’) to cover the shares of individual shareholders in those recognised cooperatives which are either under prudential supervision of the National Bank of Belgium (‘NBB’) or have invested at least half of their assets in an institution subject to such supervision (‘financial cooperatives’).
Belgija je z dopisom z dne 7. novembra 2011 Komisijo obvestila, da je vzpostavila jamstveno shemo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadružna jamstvena shema ali ukrep) za zaščito deležev posameznih delničarjev priznanih zadrug, ki so pod bonitetnim nadzorom Nacionalne banke Belgije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: NBB) ali so vložile vsaj polovico svojih sredstev v institucije, ki so pod takim nadzorom (v nadaljnjem besedilu: finančne zadruge).
By letter of 6 December 2011, the Commission indicated to the Belgian State that the measure might represent unlawful State aid [2] and urged the Belgian State to refrain from further steps to implement the measure.
Komisija je v dopisu z dne 6. decembra 2011 Belgijo opozorila, da bi ukrep lahko pomenil nezakonito državno pomoč [2], in jo pozvala, naj se vzdrži nadaljnjega izvajanja ukrepa.
The Commission invited the Belgian State to comment on its preliminary findings which the Belgian State did by letter of 22 December 2011.
Komisija je Belgijo pozvala, naj predloži pripombe o njenih predhodnih ugotovitvah, in Belgija jih je predložila z dopisom z dne 22. decembra 2011.
By decision of 3 April 2012 (‘the Opening Decision’), the Commission informed Belgium that it had initiated the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘the Treaty’) in respect of the measure and it enjoined Belgium in accordance with Article 11(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/19The Belgian Council of State also pointed to the potential99 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union [3] to suspend the measure until the Commission had decided on its compatibility with the internal market.
Komisija je s sklepom z dne 3. aprila 2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklep o začetku postopka) Belgijo obvestila, da je začela postopek iz člena 108(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Pogodba) v zvezi z navedenim ukrepom, in jo v skladu s členom 11(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 108 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije [3] pozvala, naj začasno odloži izvajanje ukrepa, dokler Komisija ne odloči o njegovi združljivosti s skupnim trgom.
The Commission required Belgium to immediately cease any action which would further implement the cooperative guarantee scheme and to abstain from any payments under the measure.
Komisija je od Belgije zahtevala, naj nemudoma preneha izvajati vse ukrepe, ki bi pomenili nadaljnje izvajanje zadružne jamstvene sheme, in se vzdrži kakršnih koli plačil v okviru ukrepa.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure — by which the Commission also invited interested parties to comment on the measure — was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4].
Sklep Komisije o začetku postopka, s katerim je Komisija tudi povabila zainteresirane strani, naj predložijo pripombe o ukrepu, je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4].
By letters of 24 April 2012 and 31 May 2012, the Belgian State asked for additional time to react on the Opening Decision, to which the Commission did not object.
Belgija je z dopisoma z dne 24. aprila 2012 in 31. maja 2012 zaprosila za podaljšanje roka za odgovor na sklep o začetku postopka, čemur Komisija ni nasprotovala.
By letter of 18 June 2012, the Belgian State sent a reaction on the Opening Decision annexed to which was, among others, a letter from the Governor of the NBB to the Belgian Minister of Finance dated 7 October 2011.
Belgija je z dopisom z dne 18. junija 2012 poslala pripombe na sklep o začetku postopka, h katerim je med drugim priložila pismo guvernerja NBB ministru za finance z dne 7. oktobra 2011.
On 17 August 2012, the Arco Group (‘ARCO’ [5]) also submitted a reaction to the Opening Decision.
17. avgusta 2012 je pripombe na sklep o začetku postopka predložila tudi skupina Arco (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ARCO [5]).
On 29 August 2012, the Commission forwarded that submission to the Belgian State, thereby giving the Member State the opportunity to react to ARCO's comments.
Komisija je 29. avgusta 2012 te pripombe posredovala Belgiji in s tem državi članici dala priložnost, da predloži odgovore na pripombe skupine ARCO.
On 16 October 2012, however, the Belgian State indicated it would not make use of that opportunity.
Vendar je Belgija 16. oktobra 2012 navedla, da te priložnosti ne bo izkoristila.
Follow-up questions from the Commission on the measure, in particular on 17 September 2012 and 24 July 2013, were answered by the Belgian State on 5 December 2012 and 20 September 2013 respectively.
Belgija je na naknadna vprašanja o ukrepu, ki jih je Komisija predložila 17. septembra 2012 in 24. julija 2013, odgovorila 5. decembra 2012 in 20. septembra 2013.
Genesis of the notified measure
Izvor priglašenega ukrepa
The establishment of the cooperative guarantee scheme was linked to rescue measures in another State aid case.
Vzpostavitev zadružne jamstvene sheme je bila povezana z ukrepi za reševanje iz drugega primera državne pomoči.
On 30 September 2008, Dexia announced a capital increase of EUR 6,4 billion, subscribed by its existing shareholders (one of which was ARCO) and by the authorities of Belgium, France and Luxembourg.
Skupina Dexia je 30. septembra 2008 napovedala povečanje kapitala v višini 6,4 milijarde EUR, ki so ga zagotovili njeni obstoječi delničarji (vključno z ARCO) ter belgijski, francoski in luksemburški organi.
Before a Special Commission of the Belgian Parliament investigating the circumstances of the dismantlement of Dexia (hereafter ‘the Dexia Commission’), the Belgian Minister of Finance at the time State aid was granted to Dexia in 2008 explained that, following requests to intervene in favour of ARCO, there had already been in September/October 2008 a political decision to put the cooperative guarantee scheme in place.
Leta 2008, ko je bila Dexii dodeljena državna pomoč, je takratni belgijski minister za finance pred posebno komisijo belgijskega parlamenta, ki je preiskovala razpustitev skupine Dexia (v nadaljnjem besedilu: komisija za Dexio), pojasnil, da je bila politična odločitev za vzpostavitev zadružne jamstvene sheme sprejeta že septembra in oktobra 2008 po prejemu zahtev za ukrepanje v korist ARCO.
He explained that, in order to reach an agreement on Dexia, the government had to take at the same time a decision on ARCO and Ethias [6].
Pojasnil je, da je morala vlada, da bi dosegla sporazum o Dexii, hkrati sprejeti odločitev glede družb ARCO in Ethias [6].
It is also clear from the statements of the current Belgian Minister of Finance that the commitment was made in 2008 in order to ensure that ARCO agreed to take part in the rescue of Dexia [7].
Iz izjav sedanjega belgijskega ministra za finance je prav tako razvidno, da je bila zaveza sprejeta leta 2008 za zagotovitev, da bo družba ARCO sodelovala pri reševanju Dexie [7].
Press communications
Sporočila v medijih
On 10 October 2008, the Belgian government announced by way of press release from the services of the Minister of Finance that it had decided to:
Belgijska vlada je 10. oktobra 2008 v sporočilu za javnost, ki so ga objavile službe Ministrstva za finance, sporočila, da se je odločila, da bo:
increase the coverage of the existing Deposit Guarantee Scheme for credit institutions from EUR 20000 to EUR 100000
povečala kritje v obstoječem sistemu zajamčenih vlog za kreditne institucije z 20000 EUR na 100000 EUR,
make available a similar scheme to other financial products (in particular ‘branch 21’ life insurance products [8] and shares in financial cooperatives [9]).(10) On 21 January 2009, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance confirmed in a joint press release the commitment given by the previous government [10] to introduce a cooperative guarantee scheme [11].
dala na voljo podoben sistem za druge finančne produkte (zlasti za produkte življenjskega zavarovanja „kategorije 21“ [8] in deleže v finančnih zadrugah) [9].(10) Predsednik vlade in minister za finance sta 21. januarja 2009 v skupnem sporočilu za javnost potrdila zavezo prejšnje vlade [10] glede uvedbe zadružne jamstvene sheme [11].
On the same day, ARCO put that press release of the Belgian government on its website.
Skupina ARCO je navedeno sporočilo belgijske vlade isti dan objavila na svoji spletni strani.
By contrast, other financial cooperatives distanced themselves from the analogy between deposits and shares in financial cooperatives which underlies the cooperative guarantee scheme [12].
Nasprotno so druge finančne zadruge izkazale odklonilno stališče do analogije med vlogami in delnicami v finančnih zadrugah, na kateri temelji zadružna jamstvena shema [12].
Legislative process
Zakonodajni postopek
On 15 October 2008, the Belgian Parliament approved a law [13] allowing the Belgian government to take measures to preserve financial stability.
Belgijski parlament je 15. oktobra 2008 odobril zakon [13], ki belgijski vladi omogoča, da sprejme ukrepe za ohranjanje finančne stabilnosti.
On 14 November 2008 [14], the Belgian State published a Royal Decree increasing the level of coverage under the Deposit Guarantee Scheme for credit institutions to EUR 100000, while also introducing an insurance guarantee scheme for ‘branch 21’ life insurance products.
Belgija je 14. novembra 2008 [14] objavila kraljevi odlok, s katerim je zvišala stopnjo kritja sistema zajamčenih vlog za kreditne institucije na 100000 EUR in hkrati uvedla sistem jamstev za zavarovanja za produkte življenjskega zavarovanja „kategorije 21“.
On 29 October 2008, the Financial Stability Board had given a favourable opinion on the draft version of that Royal Decree [15].
Odbor za finančno stabilnost je 29. oktobra 2008 podal pozitivno mnenje o osnutku navedenega kraljevega odloka [15].
On 14 April 2009 [16], the Belgian State amended the Law of 15 October 2008, allowing the government to put in place by Royal Decree a system to guarantee the paid-up capital of individual shareholders in financial cooperatives.
Belgija je 14. aprila 2009 [16] spremenila zakon z dne 15. oktobra 2008 in s tem vladi omogočila, da s kraljevim odlokom vzpostavi sistem jamstev za vplačani kapital posameznih delničarjev v finančnih zadrugah.
The Royal Decree of 10 October 2011 contains further details on the cooperative guarantee scheme.
Guverner je navedel, da bi lahko vlada v primeru nenadne krize na finančnih trgih ali v primeru resne nevarnosti sistemske krize zakonito sprejela kraljevi odlok o zadružni jamstveni shemi.
On 7 October 2011, the Governor of the NBB wrote a letter to the then Minister of Finance to give an opinion on the (draft) Royal Decree of 10 October 2011, a procedural step which was required under the Law on the organisation of the NBB [18].
Guverner je zaključil, da navedene okoliščine očitno obstajajo in da bi zadružna jamstvena shema prispevala k omejitvi učinkov take krize [19].
The Governor noted that the government could legally take a Royal Decree on a cooperative guarantee scheme in case of a sudden crisis on the financial markets or in case of a serious threat of a systemic crisis.
Vendar se je v pismu hkrati izrecno vzdržal zavzetja stališča glede vprašanja, ali so posamezne delnice finančnih zadrug v bistvu vloge [20].
The Governor concluded that those circumstances seemed to be met and that a cooperative guarantee scheme would help to limit the effects of such a crisis [19].
V pismu je poleg tega navedel, da bi ukrep lahko sprožil vprašanja v zvezi z državno pomočjo [21] in izrazil pomisleke, da bi neobvezni značaj zadružne jamstvene sheme lahko povzročil težave glede „napačne izbire“ [22].
At the same time however, the Governor's letter expressly refrained from taking a view as to whether individual shares of financial cooperatives are in essence deposits [20].
13. oktobra 2011 so tri zadruge v skupini ARCO (ARCOFIN, ARCOPAR in ARCOPLUS) vložile vlogo za sodelovanje v zadružni jamstveni shemi.
The letter also indicated that the measure might raise State aid issues [21] and expressed concerns that the non-mandatory character of the cooperative guarantee scheme could lead to ‘adverse selection’ problems [22].
Skupščine družb ARCOFIN, ARCOPAR in ARCOPLUS so 8. decembra 2011 odobrile predloge svojih izvršilnih odborov za začetek likvidacijskega postopka.
The Belgian government approved that request by a Royal Decree of 7 November 2011 [23].
Člen 3 Direktive 94/19/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 1994 o sistemih zajamčenih vlog [25] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: direktiva o sistemih zajamčenih vlog) vsako državo članico zavezuje, da:
As part of its application, ARCO also paid total fees of EUR 2,05 million [24].
„[…] na svojem ozemlju zagotovi ustanovitev in uradno priznanje enega ali več sistemov zajamčenih vlog.
On 8 December 2011 the General Meetings of ARCOFIN, ARCOPAR and ARCOPLUS approved the proposals of their executive boards to go into liquidation.
Razen v [nekaterih] primerih […] lahko kreditna institucija [26], pooblaščena v tisti državi članici […], prevzema vloge [27] le, če je članica takšnega sistema“.
Directive 94/19/EC on deposit guarantee schemes
Belgija je leta 1998 direktivo o sistemih zajamčenih vlog prenesla v nacionalno zakonodajo in ustanovila sistem zajamčenih vlog za kritje celotnih vlog posameznega vlagatelja v primeru nerazpoložljivosti.
Article 3 of Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit guarantee schemes [25] (‘the DGS Directive’) obliges every Member State to:
Zagotavljanje belgijskega jamstva za vloge je bilo naloženo skladu zajamčenih vlog.
‘…ensure that within its territory one or more deposit guarantee schemes are introduced and officially recognized.
Belgija je nato s kraljevim odlokom z dne 14. novembra 2008 ustanovila „posebni zaščitni sklad“, ki zagotavlja kritje za poznejše pobude Belgije [28].
Except in [certain] circumstances …., no credit institution [26] authorized in that Member State …, may take deposits [27] unless it is a member of such a scheme.’
Člen 7 direktive o sistemih zajamčenih vlog je v svoji prvotni obliki določal, da je treba za celotne vloge posameznega vlagatelja zagotoviti kritje do 20000 EUR.
In 1998, the Belgian State transposed the DGS Directive into national law and put in place a deposit guarantee scheme covering aggregate deposits of a depositor in case of unavailability.
Svet za ekonomske in finančne zadeve je na zasedanju 7. oktobra 2008 sklenil, da je treba takratno stopnjo kritja vlog, predvideno v direktivi o sistemih zajamčenih vlog, zvišati.
The Belgian deposit guarantee was entrusted to a deposit guarantee fund.
Glede na njegovo sporočilo za javnost je sklenil, da:
By means of the Royal Decree of 14 November 2008, the Belgian State subsequently created a ‘Special Protection Fund’, which covers later initiatives of the Belgian State [28].
„bodo vse države članice zagotovile varstvo zajamčenih vlog za posameznike v znesku najmanj 50000 EUR za začetno obdobje najmanj enega leta, zavedajoč se, da se mnoge države članice odločajo za zvišanje minimalnega zajamčenega zneska na 100000 EUR.Pozdravljamo namero Komisije, da bo takoj predložila ustrezni predlog za spodbujanje konvergence sistemov zajamčenih vlog“ [29].
In its original form Article 7 of the DGS Directive provided that the aggregate deposits of each depositor had to be covered up to EUR 20000.
V zvezi s kritjem člen 2 direktive o sistemih zajamčenih vlog določa, da sistemi zajamčenih vlog ne smejo ščititi kapitalskih instrumentov kreditnih institucij [30].
At its meeting of 7 October 2008, the Ecofin Council agreed that the deposit coverage then foreseen in the DGS Directive should be increased.
Direktiva 2009/14/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2009 o spremembah Direktive 94/19/ES o sistemih zajamčenih vlog glede stopnje kritja in rokov za izplačilo [31] je zvišala stopnjo kritja sistemov zajamčenih vlog (najprej na najmanj 50000 EUR in nato načeloma na najmanj 100000 EUR najpozneje do 31. decembra 2010).
According to its press release, it agreed that:
Direktiva 97/9/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. marca 1997 o odškodninskih shemah za vlagatelje [32] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: direktiva o odškodninskih shemah za vlagatelje) predvideva odškodnino za vlagatelje, če investicijsko podjetje ni sposobno vrniti sredstev, ki pripadajo vlagatelju.
‘all Member States would, for an initial period of at least one year, provide deposit guarantee protection for individuals for an amount of at least EUR 50000, acknowledging that many Member States determine to raise their minimum to EUR 100000.
Taka odškodnina je na voljo, če je bila v podjetju na primer zagrešena goljufija ali malomarnost ali če so v sistemih podjetja napake ali težave.
We welcome the intention of the Commission to bring forward urgently an appropriate proposal to promote convergence of deposit guarantee schemes’ [29].
Vendar odškodninske sheme za vlagatelje ne krijejo naložbenega tveganja (na primer, če je vlagatelj kupil delnice, katerih vrednost je nato padla).
In terms of coverage, Article 2 of the DGS Directive provides that deposit guarantee schemes should not protect capital instruments of credit institutions [30].
Belgijski pravni okvir za zadruge
Directive 2009/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 amending Directive 94/19/EC on deposit-guarantee schemes as regards the coverage level and the pay-out delay [31] increased the coverage level of deposit guarantee schemes (first to EUR 50000 minimum and then in principle to EUR 100000 minimum and maximum by 31 December 2010).
Belgijski zakon o družbah [33] in zlasti členi od 350 do 436 zakona določajo pravni okvir za zadruge.