natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This argument however cannot be accepted as it is not foreseen in Article 3(1)(a)(ii), point (i) of Annex I, Annex II or Annex III of the basic Regulation.
Vendar tega argumenta ni mogoče sprejeti, saj to ni predvideno v členu 3(1)(a)(ii), točki (i) Priloge I, Prilogi II in Prilogi III k osnovni uredbi.
In the absence of other comments, recitals 48 to 64 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb ni bilo, se uvodne izjave 48 do 64 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In addition, it was found that the Indian exporting producer, KEI Industries, was using the DDS in the IP.
Nadalje je bilo ugotovljeno, da je indijski proizvajalec izvoznik KEI Industries v OP uporabljal DDS.
The subsidy rate amounted to 0,29 %.
Stopnja subvencije je znašala 0,29 %.
One of the sampled Indian exporting producers argued that the AAS should be considered as a duty drawback system, because the imported materials are used to produce exported goods.
Eden od vzorčenih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdil, da bi bilo treba AAS obravnavati kot sistem povračila dajatev, saj se uvoženi materiali uporabljajo za proizvodnjo izvoznega blaga.
As explained in recital 76 of the provisional Regulation the sub-scheme used in the present case is not a permissible duty drawback system or substitution drawback system within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(ii) of the basic Regulation.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 76 začasne uredbe, v tem primeru uporabljena podshema ni dovoljen sistem povračila dajatev ali sistem nadomestnega povračila v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe.
It does not conform to the rules laid down in point (i) of Annex I, Annex II or Annex III of the basic Regulation.
Ne izpolnjuje pravil iz točke (i) Priloge I ter iz Priloge II in Priloge III k osnovni uredbi.
The GOI did not effectively apply a verification system or a procedure to confirm whether and in what amounts inputs were consumed in the production of the exported product (Annex II(II)(4) of the basic Regulation and, in the case of substitution drawback schemes, Annex III(II)(2) of the basic Regulation).
Indijska vlada ni učinkovito uporabljala svojega sistema ali postopka preverjanja, da bi lahko potrdila, ali in v kakšnih količinah so bile surovine porabljene pri proizvodnji izvoznega izdelka (Priloga II(II)(4) k osnovni uredbi in, v primeru nadomestnih shem povračil, Priloga III(II)(2) k osnovni uredbi).
Moreover, the Standard Input Output Norms (‘SIONs’) for the product concerned were not sufficiently precise and they cannot constitute a verification system of actual consumption.
Poleg tega standardni normativi input-output („SION“) za zadevni izdelek niso bili dovolj natančni in ne morejo predstavljati sistema preverjanja dejanske potrošnje.
The design of those standard norms does not enable the GOI to verify with sufficient precision what amounts of inputs were consumed in the production of the exported products.
Zasnova navedenih standardov indijski vladi ne omogoča dovolj natančnega preverjanja količin surovin, porabljenih v proizvodnji izvoznih izdelkov.
In addition, the GOI did not carry out any further examination based on actual inputs involved as explained in recital 73 of the provisional Regulation, although this would normally need to be carried out in the absence of an effectively applied verification system (Annex II(II)(5) and Annex III(II)(3) to the basic Regulation).
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 73 začasne uredbe, indijska vlada tudi ni izvedla nadaljnje preiskave na podlagi dejansko vključenih surovin, čeprav bi to ob odsotnosti učinkovitega sistema preverjanja (Priloga II(II)(5) in Priloga III(II)(3) k osnovni uredbi) morala storiti.
The sub-scheme is therefore countervailing, and the argument is rejected.
Proti tej podshemi se torej lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, argument pa je zavrnjen.
In the absence of other comments, recitals 65 to 80 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb ni bilo, se uvodne izjave 65 do 80 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The Indian exporting producer, KEI Industries, was found not to use AAS in the IP.
Ugotovilo se je, da indijski proizvajalec izvoznik KEI Industries v OP ni uporabljal AAS.
Upon the definitive disclosure, one of the Indian exporting producers provided comments on a calculation error.
Ob dokončnem razkritju je eden od indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov predložil pripombe glede napake v izračunu.
This comment was partially warranted and was acknowledged in the calculation of the subsidy amount.
Ta pripomba je bila delno upravičena in se je upoštevala pri izračunu subvencijskega zneska.
Since the overall subsidy margin for this company was below the de minimis level even before this correction, the adjustment neither changes the final level of the countervailing duty of this company nor does it affect the average subsidy margin calculated for the cooperating non-sampled companies or the country-wide subsidy margin.
Ker je bila splošna subvencijska stopnja za to družbo že pred tem popravkom nižja od ravni de minimis, prilagoditev ne spremeni končne ravni izravnalne dajatve te družbe niti ne vpliva na povprečno subvencijsko stopnjo, izračunano za sodelujoče nevzorčene družbe, ali subvencijsko stopnjo na ravni države.
Apart from the above, recitals 81 to 91 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Razen navedenega se uvodne izjave 81 do 91 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The Indian exporting producer, KEI Industries, was found not to benefit from the EPCGS in the IP with regard to the product concerned.
Ugotovilo se je, da indijski proizvajalec izvoznik KEI Industries v OP ni imel ugodnosti iz sheme EPCGS v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom.
The GOI argued that in recital 92 of the provisional Regulation the Commission incorrectly cited the legal basis of the ECS.
Indijska vlada je trdila, da Komisija v uvodni izjavi 92 začasne uredbe ni pravilno navedla pravne podlage za ECS.
The GOI indicated that the Master Circular DBOD No DIR(Exp.) BC 01/04.02.02/2007-2008 (‘MC 07-08’) and Master Circular DBOD No DIR(Exp.) BC 09/04.02.02/2008-09 (‘MC 08-09’) were updated and these were Master Circular DBOD No DIR(Exp.) BC 06/04.02.002/2010-11 (‘MC 10-11’) and Master Circular DBOD No DIR(Exp.) BC 04/04.02.002/2011-2012 (‘MC 11-12) which constituted the legal basis for the ECS in the IP.
Po navedbah indijske vlade sta bili okrožnici Master Circular DBOD št. DIR(Exp.) BC 01/04.02.02/2007-2008 („MC 07-08“) in Master Circular DBOD št. DIR(Exp.) BC 09/04.02.02/2008-09 („MC 08-09“) posodobljeni, in sicer z okrožnicama Master Circular DBOD št. DIR(Exp.) BC 06/04.02.002/2010-11 („MC 10-11“) in Master Circular DBOD št. DIR(Exp.) BC 04/04.02.002/2011-2012 („MC 11-12“), ki sta bili pravna podlaga za ECS v OP.
Indeed the observation of the GOI is correct in this regard.
Ta ugotovitev indijske vlade je pravilna.
The GOI further argued that, had the proper updated legal basis been taken into account, the Commission would have to take a note of the fact that the maximum ceiling interest rate applicable to export credits, previously made mandatory by the Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’) for the commercial banks, ceased to exist before the IP with regard to export credits in rupees.
Indijska vlada je nadalje trdila, da bi morala Komisija v primeru, da bi se upoštevala ustrezna posodobljena pravna podlaga, tudi upoštevati, da je najvišja obrestna mera za izvozne kredite, ki jo je Indijska centralna banka („ICB“) predhodno določila kot obvezno za komercialne banke, prenehala obstajati pred OP, in sicer za izvozne kredite v indijskih rupijah.
Therefore, this scheme as far as credits in rupees are concerned can no longer be considered a subsidy.
Zato to shemo v zvezi s krediti v indijskih rupijah ni več mogoče obravnavati kot subvencijo.
The investigation demonstrated that two sampled companies benefited in practice from export credits from privately owned banks with rates below the reference rate set by the Bank of India.
Preiskava je pokazala, da sta dve vzorčeni družbi v praksi prejemali ugodnosti iz izvoznih kreditov od zasebnih bank, pri čemer so bile stopnje nižje od referenčne stopnje, ki jo je določila ICB.
The investigation has not revealed a commercial rational as to why these privately owned banks provide credits at discounted and apparently loss-making rates.
Preiskava ni pokazala, da bi te zasebne banke komercialno utemeljeno zagotavljale kredite po diskontiranih stopnjah, ki očitno prinašajo izgubo.
These lending practices of the banks could suggest that there is still government involvement.
Te posojilne prakse bank bi lahko pomenile še vedno obstoječo vključenost vlade.
However, the investigation did not produce evidence of the level required under WTO rules to show continuing entrustment or direction of the commercial banks.
Vendar pa preiskava ni podala dokazov o stopnji vpliva, ki bi v skladu s pravili STO pomenila, da je komercialnim bankam še vedno zaupano izvajanje nalog, dana pa so jim tudi navodila.
Therefore, the Commission has decided not to count the benefit of the discounted rates as a subsidy under this sub-scheme, in the absence of sufficient evidence of direction and/or a financial contribution by the GOI.
Zato se je Komisija odločila, da ugodnosti iz diskontiranih stopenj ne bo štela za subvencijo v tej podshemi, saj ni zadostnih dokazov o dajanju navodil in/ali finančnem prispevanju indijske vlade.
Invoking Article 15(1) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation the GOI argues that in such a case also this element of the export credit scheme should not be countervailed, because government direction of the banks has been removed.
Indijska vlada s sklicevanjem na člen 15(1) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe trdi, da v takem primeru tudi ta element sheme izvoznih kreditov ne bi smel biti izravnan, saj je bilo dajanje navodil bankam s strani vlade odpravljeno.
Although in the submitted MC 12-13 there is a provision which makes it free for the commercial banks to determine the interest rates on export credits in foreign currency with effect from May 2012 as claimed by the GOI, such a change of instruction of RBI to the private banks during the investigation would by itself be insufficient to exclude this scheme, since government direction may continue in an informal manner which would have to be the subject of further investigation.
Čeprav je po trditvah indijske vlade v predloženi okrožnici MC 12-13 določba z začetkom veljavnosti maja 2012, v skladu s katero lahko komercialne banke same določijo obrestne mere za izvozne kredite v tuji valuti, takšna sprememba navodil ICB zasebnim bankam med preiskavo sama po sebi ne bi zadostovala za izključitev te sheme, saj se vladno dajanje navodil lahko nadaljuje na neformalen način, kar bi bilo treba nadalje preiskati.
However, in view of the above conclusion on the sub-scheme concerning export credits in rupees, the Commission has decided not to countervail this sub-scheme concerning credits in foreign currency at this stage.
Vendar se je Komisija glede na naveden sklep o podshemi v zvezi z izvoznimi krediti v indijskih rupijah odločila, da v tej fazi ne bo uvedla izravnalnih ukrepov za podshemo v zvezi s krediti v tuji valuti.
In light of the above, the duty rates will be adjusted where applicable.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se bodo stopnje dajatev prilagodile, kjer je to primerno.
Focus Market Scheme (‘FMS’)
Shema usmeritve v trg („FMS“)
Upon the definitive disclosure, the GOI submitted comments on FMS.
Ob dokončnem razkritju je indijska vlada predložila pripombe glede FMS.
The GOI argued that the scheme is geographically related to countries not part of the Union and can thus not be countervailed by the Union.
Trdila je, da je shema geografsko povezana z državami, ki niso članice Unije, zato je Unija ne more izravnati.
Nevertheless, the GOI was not able to dispute either the practical implementations of the scheme or that the FMS benefit can be used for the product concerned, namely the fact that duty credits under FMS are freely transferable and that they can be used for payment of custom duties on subsequent imports of any inputs or goods including capital goods.
Kljub temu indijska vlada ni mogla oporekati niti praktičnemu izvajanju sheme niti uporabi FMS v korist zadevnega izdelka oziroma dejstvu, da so dobropisi za carine po FMS prosto prenosljivi in da se lahko uporabijo za plačilo carinskih dajatev na naknadni uvoz katerih koli surovin ali blaga, vključno z investicijskim blagom.
Therefore, this claim had to be rejected as the investigation has shown that the product concerned can and does benefit from this scheme when exported to the Union.
Zato je bilo treba to trditev zavrniti, saj je preiskava pokazala, da se ta shema lahko uporablja za zadevni izdelek, kadar se izvaža v Unijo, in da se dejansko uporablja.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals 101 to 111 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave 101 do 111 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
The Indian exporting producer, KEI Industries, was found not to use FMS in the IP.
Ugotovilo se je, da indijski proizvajalec izvoznik KEI Industries v OP ni uporabljal FMS.
Upon the definitive disclosure, the sole exporting producer investigated using EOUS submitted comments on this scheme.
Ob dokončnem razkritju je edini proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je bil predmet preiskave in uporablja shemo EOUS, predložil pripombe o tej shemi.
The company claimed that the Commission should use a different method to calculate the benefit received under the EOUS.
Družba je trdila, da bi morala Komisija uporabiti drugačno metodo za izračun ugodnosti, prejete iz EOUS.
The company argued that certain benefits under EOUS should be treated as a permissible duty drawback scheme within the meaning of Annexes II and III of the basic Regulation and that they therefore should not be countervailing.
Trdila je še, da bi bilo treba določene ugodnosti po EOUS obravnavati kot dovoljeno shemo povračila dajatev v smislu Priloge II in III k osnovni uredbi ter da se zanje torej ne bi smeli uvesti izravnalni ukrepi.
It was however found that regardless of which method of calculation used, the subsidy rate for this scheme would not exceed 0,95 %, meaning that the overall subsidy margin for this company would remain below de minimis level.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da ne glede na uporabljeno metodo za izračun subvencijska stopnja za to shemo ne bi presegla 0,95 %, kar pomeni, da bi splošna subvencijska stopnja za to družbo ostala nižja od ravni de minimis.
Therefore it was not deemed necessary to analyse this claim further in the context of this investigation.
Zato se ni štelo, da bi bilo treba to trditev v okviru sedanje preiskave nadalje analizirati.
In the absence of any other comments, recital 112 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb ni bilo, se uvodna izjava 112 začasne uredbe potrdi.
The Indian exporting producer, KEI Industries, was found not to benefit the EOUS in the IP.
Ugotovilo se je, da indijski proizvajalec izvoznik KEI Industries v OP ni uporabljal EOUS.
Amount of countervailing subsidies
Znesek subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi
Following the decision not to count the benefits under the ESC as a subsidy as described in recitals 38 to 41 and correction of EPCGS benefit calculation for one of the companies as described in recital 35, the duty rates have been adjusted where applicable.
Po sprejetju odločitve, da se ugodnosti iz ECS ne štejejo za subvencijo, kot je opisano v uvodnih izjavah 38 do 41, in popravljenem izračunu ugodnosti iz EPCGS za eno od družb, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 35, so bile stopnje dajatev prilagojene, kadar je bilo primerno.
The definitive amounts of countervailing subsidies established in accordance with the provisions of the basic Regulation, expressed ad valorem, now range from 0,79 % to 3,72 %.
Dokončne višine subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi v skladu z določbami osnovne uredbe, izražene ad valorem, zdaj znašajo med 0,79 % in 3,72 %.
The recalculated subsidy margin for the cooperating companies not included in the sample is 3,41 %.
Ponovno izračunana subvencijska stopnja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso zajete v vzorcu, je 3,41 %.
The recalculated country-wide subsidy margin is 3,72 %.
Ponovno izračunana stopnja subvencije na ravni države je 3,72 %.
Some users questioned the number of Union producers as stated in recital 116 of the provisional Regulation.
Nekateri uporabniki so izrazili dvome glede števila proizvajalcev Unije, navedenega v uvodni izjavi 116 začasne uredbe.
They claim that number of producers was wrongly assessed and in reality there are fewer producers present on the Union market.
Trdijo, da je bilo število proizvajalcev napačno ocenjeno in da je na trgu Unije v resnici prisotnih manj proizvajalcev.
The Commission points out that the above claim was not substantiated and confirms after verification the information given in recital 116 of the provisional Regulation, namely that 27 Union producers were manufacturing the product concerned in the Union during the IP.
Komisija poudarja, da navedena trditev ni bila utemeljena, in po preverjanju potrjuje resničnost informacije iz uvodne izjave 116 začasne uredbe, in sicer da je 27 proizvajalcev Unije izdelovalo zadevni izdelek v Uniji v OP.
This is the number identified on the basis of the complaint, at standing phase and during the investigation.
Ta številka je bila ugotovljena na podlagi pritožbe v fazi preverjanja reprezentativnosti in med preiskavo.
The Commission contacted all known Union producers and received data which was used in the context of the current investigation.
Komisija je vzpostavila stik z vsemi znanimi proizvajalci Unije in prejela podatke, ki so se uporabili v zvezi s sedanjo preiskavo.
Union production and Sampling of Union producers
Proizvodnja Unije in vzorčenje proizvajalcev Unije
In the absence of comments, recitals 117 to 119 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker pripomb ni bilo, se uvodne izjave 117 do 119 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Some users claimed that the injury analyses should have disregarded the data relating to 2009 because the financial crisis which occurred that year had distorting effects in particular on the Union consumption.
Nekateri uporabniki so trdili, da se v analizi škode ne bi smeli upoštevati podatki v zvezi z letom 2009, saj je imela finančna kriza, ki se je takrat začela, učinke izkrivljanja zlasti na potrošnjo Unije.
However, even if 2009 was excluded from the analysis, there would still be a growing trend for consumption (+ 5 %) which is an indication of an improving market.
Tudi v primeru, če bi se leto 2009 izključilo iz analize, bi trend za potrošnjo še vedno rastel (+ 5 %), kar kaže na to, da se trg izboljšuje.
Moreover, the negative effects of the financial crises are recognised in recital 120 of the provisional Regulation, but was concluded that the market situation improved.
Uvodna izjava 120 začasne uredbe poleg tega priznava negativne učinke finančnih kriz, vendar je bilo sklenjeno, da se je položaj trga izboljšal.
In absence of other comments, recital 120 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb ni bilo, se uvodna izjava 120 začasne uredbe potrdi.
The subsidy margin established for KEI Industries is below the de minimis threshold foreseen in Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation (see recital 49 above).
Stopnja subvencije, ugotovljena za družbo KEI Industries, je nižja od praga de minimis, predvidenega v členu 14(5) osnovne uredbe (glej uvodno izjavo 49).
Therefore, it is deemed that this exporting producer has not benefited from subsidy schemes within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a)(ii) and Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation during the investigation period.
Zato se šteje, da ta proizvajalec izvoznik v obdobju preiskave ni prejemal ugodnosti iz subvencijskih shem v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(ii) in člena 3(2) osnovne uredbe.
As a result, its import volumes were excluded from the volume of subsidised imports from India.
Zato je bil njegov obseg uvoza izključen iz obsega subvencioniranega uvoza iz Indije.
One exporting producer, namely the Venus group submitted that certain transactions were mistakenly double counted.
Po navedbah enega proizvajalca izvoznika, in sicer skupine Venus, so bile nekatere transakcije pomotoma štete dvojno.
The Commission agreed with the exporting producer, therefore these transactions were removed from the total volume of subsidised imports from India.
Komisija se je z njim strinjala, zato so bile te transakcije odstranjene iz celotnega obsega subvencioniranega uvoza iz Indije.
Accordingly, the volume, market share and the average price of the subsidised imports were revised.
V skladu s tem je bila opravljena revizija obsega, tržnega deleža in povprečne cene subvencioniranega uvoza.
Volume and market share of the subsidised imports:
Obseg in tržni delež subvencioniranega uvoza:
Eurostat and questionnaire replies.
Eurostat in izpolnjeni vprašalniki.
Volume (MT)
Obseg (v tonah)
KEI Industries exported limited quantities of the product concerned during the IP and the transactions of the Venus group mentioned above also constituted limited quantities, therefore the deduction of these import volumes from the total volume of subsidised imports from India does not result in changes concerning in the trends as described in recitals 123 and 124 of the provisional Regulation.
Družba KEI Industries je v OP izvozila omejene količine zadevnega izdelka in tudi navedene transakcije skupine Venus so zadevale omejene količine, zato odstranitev obsega tega uvoza iz skupnega obsega subvencioniranega uvoza iz Indije ni povzročila sprememb trendov, opisanih v uvodnih izjavah 123 in 124 začasne uredbe.
Thus these recitals of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ti uvodni izjavi v začasni uredbi sta torej potrjeni.
Average price of the subsidised imports:
Povprečna cena subvencioniranega uvoza:
(euro/MT)
(v eurih/tonah)
As explained above, K.E.I Industries exported limited quantities during the IP and the removal of certain transactions of the Venus group affected only limited quantities.
Kot je bilo pojasnjeno, je družba KEI Industries v OP izvozila omejene količine, prav tako je odstranitev določenih transakcij skupine Venus vplivala le na omejene količine.
The exclusion of KEI Industries import volumes and the above mentioned transactions of the Venus group from the total volume of subsidised imports from India does therefore not result in any significant change in the average price of the subsidised Indian imports or in the undercutting calculations.
Z izključitvijo obsega uvoza družbe KEI Industries in navedenih transakcij skupine Venus iz celotnega obsega subvencioniranega uvoza iz Indije se povprečna cena subvencioniranega indijskega uvoza ali izračun nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen torej nista bistveno spremenila.
The recalculated undercutting margin is 11,7 %.
Ponovno izračunana stopnja nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen znaša 11,7 %.
For the rest, the conclusions drawn from the findings described in recitals 128 to 130 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
V zvezi z ostalim se potrdijo sklepi na podlagi ugotovitev iz uvodnih izjav 128 do 130 začasne uredbe.
In response to the final disclosure, the GOI argued that the Commission had applied the pro rata reduction of subsidised imports only on the import volumes of cooperating exporting producers in order to take account of the de minimis findings KEI and the removal of certain mistakenly double counted transactions of the Venus group.
Indijska vlada je v odzivu na dokončno razkritje trdila, da je Komisija uporabila sorazmerno zmanjšanje subvencioniranega uvoza le za obseg uvoza sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, da bi se upoštevale ugotovitve de minimis v zvezi z družbo KEI in odstranitev določenih pomotoma dvojno štetih transakcij skupine Venus.
This claim is based on a misunderstanding.
Ta trditev temelji na napačnem razumevanju.
The Commission has applied the pro rata reduction to the entire import volume, including non-cooperating importers.
Komisija je sorazmerno zmanjšanje uporabila za celotni obseg uvoza, vključno z nesodelujočimi uvozniki.
The claim therefore has to be rejected.
Zato je trditev treba zavrniti.
Economic Situation of the Union industry
Gospodarski položaj industrije Unije