natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The colour of marker lamps and the spectral radiation distribution of light from marker lamps shall be tested in accordance with the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 74, clause 6.3.
Modul SD
The luminous intensity of marker lamps shall be tested in accordance with the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 74, clause 6.4.
ES-verifikacija na podlagi sistema vodenja kakovosti proizvodnje
Tail lamps (clause 5.3.8)
Modul SF
The colour of tail lamps shall be tested in accordance with the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 75, clause 6.3.
ES-verifikacija na podlagi preverjanja proizvoda
The luminous intensity of tail lamps shall be tested in accordance with the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 75, clause 6.4.
Modul SH1
Horn (clause 5.3.9)
ES-verifikacija na podlagi celovitega sistema vodenja kakovosti in ocenjevanja konstrukcije
Soundings of the warning horn shall be measured and verified in accordance with the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 76, clause 6.
Vložnik izbere eno izmed naslednjih kombinacij modulov:
Sound pressure levels of the warning horn on a reference vehicle shall be measured and verified in accordance with the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 76, clause 6.
(SB+SD) ali (SB+SF) ali (SH1) za vsak zadevni podsistem (ali del podsistema).
Pantograph (clause 5.3.10)
Ocena se nato opravi v skladu z izbrano kombinacijo modulov.
For pantographs for DC systems, the maximum current at standstill per contact wire shall be verified in the following conditions: the pantograph shall be in contact with 1 copper contact wire.
Kadar več ES-verifikacij (npr. na podlagi več TSI, ki se nanašajo na isti podsistem) zahteva, da verifikacija temelji na isti oceni proizvodnje (modul SD ali SF), se lahko z enim modulom ocenjevanja proizvodnje (SD ali SF) združi več modulov ocenjevanja SB.
the pantograph shall apply a static contact force as defined in the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 77.
V tem primeru se izdata vmesni izjavi o verifikaciji za fazi projektiranja in razvoja v skladu z modulom SB.
and the temperature of the contact point monitored continuously during a test of 30 minutes shall not exceed the values given in the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 78.
Veljavnost certifikata o pregledu tipa ali projektiranja se navede v skladu z določbami za fazo B iz oddelka 7.1.3 „Predpisi v zvezi z ES-verifikacijo“ te TSI.
For all pantographs, the static contact force shall be verified in accordance with the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 79.
Kadar se poleg zahtev iz oddelka 4.2 te TSI za ocenjevanje uporablja poseben postopek, je to opredeljeno v oddelku 6.2.3 v nadaljevanju.
The dynamic behaviour of the pantograph regarding current collection shall be assessed by simulation according to the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 80.
Pogoji obremenitve in tehtana masa (oddelek 4.2.2.10)
The simulations shall be made using at least two different types of overhead contact line;
Tehtana masa se izmeri za pogoj obremenitve, ki ustreza „konstrukcijsko določeni masi v stanju delovanja“, razen za potrošni material, za katerega ni zahteve (sprejemljivo je na primer „mrtva masa“).
data for simulation shall correspond to sections of lines recorded as TSI compliant in the register of infrastructure (EC declaration of conformity, or declaration according to Commission Recommendation 2011/622/EU [10]) for the appropriate speed and supply system, up to the design speed of the proposed Interoperability Constituent pantograph.It is permitted to perform the simulation using types of overhead contact line that are under the process of IC certification or declaration according to Recommendation 2011/622/EU, provided that they fulfil the other requirements of ENE TSI.
Druge pogoje obremenitve je dovoljeno opredeliti z izračuni.
The simulated current collection quality shall be in accordance with clause 4.2.8.2.9.6 for uplift, mean contact force and standard deviation for each of the overhead contact lines.
Kadar je vozilo opredeljeno kot skladno s tipom (v skladu z oddelkoma 6.2.2 in 7.1.3 te TSI):
If the simulation results are acceptable, a site dynamic test shall be made using a representative section of one of the two types of overhead contact line used in the simulation.
tehtana skupna masa vozila v pogoju obremenitve „konstrukcijsko določena masa v stanju delovanja“ deklarirane skupne mase vozila za ta tip ne presega za več kot 3 %, kar je navedeno v ES-potrdilu o verifikaciji tipa ali projektiranja ter v tehnični dokumentaciji, opisani v oddelku 4.2.12;
The interaction characteristics shall be measured in accordance with the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 81.
poleg tega za enoto z največjo konstrukcijsko določeno hitrostjo, ki je enaka ali večja od 250 km/h, masa na os v pogoju obremenitve „konstrukcijsko določena masa pri normalnem koristnem tovoru“ deklarirane mase na os za isti pogoj obremenitve ne presega za več kot 4 %.
The tested pantograph shall be mounted on a rolling stock producing a mean contact force within the upper and lower limits as required by clause 4.2.8.2.9.6 up to the design speed of the pantograph.
Kolesna obremenitev (oddelek 4.2.3.2.2)
The tests shall be conducted in both directions of travel.
Kolesna obremenitev se izmeri ob upoštevanju pogoja obremenitve „konstrukcijsko določena masa v stanju delovanja“ (z isto izjemo kot v oddelku 6.2.3.1 zgoraj).
For pantographs intended to be operated on the 1435 mm and 1668 mm track gauge systems, the tests shall include track sections with low contact wire height (defined as between 5,0 to 5,3 m) and track sections with high contact wire height (defined as between 5,5 to 5,75 m).
Zaščita pred iztirjenjem med vožnjo po vegavih tirih (oddelek 4.2.3.4.1)
For pantographs intended to be operated on the 1520 mm and 1524 mm track gauge systems, the tests shall include track sections with contact wire height between 6,0 to 6,3 m.
Dokazovanje skladnosti se opravi v skladu z eno od metod, navedenih v specifikaciji iz indeksa 83 Dodatka J-1, kot je bila spremenjena s tehnično dokumentacijo iz indeksa 2 Dodatka J-2.
The tests shall be performed for a minimum of 3 speed increments up to and including the design speed of the tested pantograph.
Za enote, predvidene za obratovanje na sistemu 1520 mm, so dovoljene druge metode za oceno skladnosti.
The interval between successive tests shall be no greater than 50 km/h.
Dinamično vozno vedenje – tehnične zahteve (oddelek 4.2.3.4.2 a)
The measured current collection quality shall be in accordance with clause 4.2.8.2.9.6 for uplift, and either mean contact force and standard deviation or percentage of arcing.
Za enote, ki so projektirane za obratovanje na sistemu 1435 mm, 1524 mm ali 1668 mm, se dokazovanje skladnosti opravi v skladu s specifikacijo iz oddelka 5 indeksa 84 Dodatka J-1.
For the use of a pantograph holding an EC declaration of verification on various designs of rolling stock, additional tests required at rolling stock level regarding quality of current collection are specified in clause 6.2.3.20.
Pogoji za ocenjevanje v skladu s specifikacijo iz indeksa 84 Dodatka J-1 se spremenijo v skladu s tehnično dokumentacijo iz indeksa 2 Dodatka J-2.
Contact strips (clause 5.3.11)
Ocena skladnosti za varnostne zahteve
Contact strips shall be verified as specified in the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 82.
Dokazovanje skladnosti z varnostnimi zahtevami, navedenimi v oddelku 4.2, se opravi na naslednji način:
Contact strips, being replaceable parts of the pantograph head, shall be verified once at the same time as a pantograph (see clause 6.1.3.7) regarding the quality of current collection.
področje tega ocenjevanja je strogo omejeno na projektiranje tirnih vozil, pri čemer se upošteva, da obratovanje, preskušanje in vzdrževanje potekajo v skladu s pravili, ki jih določi vložnik (kot je opisano v tehnični dokumentaciji).
In case of use of a material for which the manufacturer as no sufficient return of experience, the contact strip should be subject to an assessment of suitability for use (module CV; see also clause 6.1.6).
Pri opredelitvi zahtev v zvezi s preskusi in vzdrževanjem mora vložnik upoštevati raven varnosti, ki jo je treba doseči (doslednost);
It is detailed in Appendix H of this TSI in which phases of the project an assessment shall be done for the requirements applicable to the interoperability constituents:
prikaz skladnosti vključuje tudi zahteve v zvezi s preskusi in vzdrževanjem.
Design and development phase:
Drugi podsistemi in človeški dejavniki (napake) se ne upoštevajo.
Design review and/or design examination.
Vse predpostavke v zvezi s profilom naloge se jasno dokumentirajo v dokazovanju.
Type test:
Skladnost z varnostnimi zahtevami iz oddelkov 4.2.3.4.2, 4.2.4.2.2, 4.2.5.3.5, 4.2.5.5.8 in 4.2.5.5.9 z vidika stopnje resnosti/posledic, povezanih s scenariji nevarnih napak, se dokaže z eno od naslednjih dveh metod:
test to verify the design, if and as defined in the Section 4.2.
Uporaba usklajenega merila sprejemanja tveganja, povezanega z resnostjo iz oddelka 4.2 (npr. „smrtni primeri“ za zasilno zaviranje.).
Production phase:
Vložnik se lahko odloči za uporabo te metode, če je na voljo usklajeno merilo sprejemanja tveganja, opredeljeno v skupni varnostni metodi za oceno tveganja in njenih spremembah (Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 352/2009 [11]).Vložnik dokaže skladnost s harmoniziranim merilom z uporabo Priloge I-3 k skupni varnostni metodi za oceno tveganja.
routine test to verify the conformity of production.
Za dokazovanje se lahko uporabijo naslednja načela (in kombinacije načel):
The entity in charge of the assessment of the routine tests is determined according to the assessment module chosen.
podobnost z enim ali več referenčnimi sistemi; uporaba kodeksov ravnanja;
Annex H is structured according to Section 4.2;
uporaba izrecne ocene tveganja (npr. verjetnostni pristop).
the requirements and their assessment applicable to the interoperability constituents are identified in Section 5.3 by reference to certain clauses of Section 4.2;
Vložnik imenuje organ za oceno dokaza, ki ga bo zagotovil:
where relevant, a reference to a sub-clause of clause 6.1.3 above is also given.
Uporaba ocene tveganja v skladu s skupno varnostno metodo za oceno tveganja, da se opredeli merilo sprejemanja tveganja, ki ga je treba uporabiti, in dokaže skladnost s tem merilom.
If an innovative solution (as defined in article 10) is proposed for an interoperability constituent, the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the European Union shall apply the procedure described in article 10.
Vložnik se lahko vedno odloči za uporabo te metode.
Assessment of suitability for use according to the type validation of in service experience procedure (module CV) may be part of the assessment procedure for the following interoperability constituents in case the manufacturer has no sufficient return of experience for the proposed design:
Vložnik imenuje ocenjevalni organ za oceno dokazovanja, ki ga bo zagotovil, kot je opredeljeno v skupni varnostni metodi za oceno tveganja.
Wheels (see clause 6.1.3.1).
V skladu z zahtevami iz skupne varnostne metode za oceno tveganja in njenimi spremembami se zagotovi poročilo o varnostni oceni.
Wheel slide protection system (see clause 6.1.3.2).
Nacionalni varnostni organ v zadevni državni članici upošteva poročilo o varnostni oceni v skladu z oddelkom 2.5.6 Priloge I in člena 15(2) skupne varnostne metode za oceno tveganja.
Contact strips (see clause 6.1.3.8).
V primeru dodatnih dovoljenj za začetek obratovanja vozil se člen 15(5) skupne varnostne metode za oceno tveganja uporablja za priznanje poročila o varnostni oceni v drugih državah članicah.
Prior to commencing in service tests, a suitable module (CB or CH1) shall be used to certify the design of the constituent.
Za vsak oddelek TSI, naveden v točki 3 zgoraj, je v ustreznih dokumentih, ki so priloženi ES-izjavi o verifikaciji (npr. ES-potrdilo, ki ga izda priglašeni organ, ali poročilo o varnostni oceni), izrecno omenjena „uporabljena metoda“ („1“ ali „2“);
The in service tests shall be organised on proposal from the manufacturer, who has to obtain an agreement with a railway undertaking for its contribution to such assessment.
v primeru uporabe metode „2“ pa je navedeno tudi „uporabljeno merilo sprejemanja tveganja“.
The EC verification procedures to be applied to the rolling stock subsystem are described in Article 18 and Annex VI of Directive 2008/57/EC.
Konstrukcijsko določene vrednosti za nove profile koles (oddelek 4.2.3.4.3.1)
The EC verification procedure of a rolling stock unit shall be performed according to the prescribed modules(s) specified in clause 6.2.2 of this TSI.
Za enote, ki so projektirane za obratovanje na sistemu tirne širine 1435 mm, se izbereta profil koles in razdalja med aktivnimi površinami koles (mera SR na sliki 1, oddelek 4.2.3.5.2.1), da se zagotovi, da ni presežena mejna vrednost ekvivalentne koničnosti iz preglednice 11 spodaj, kadar se projektirana kolesna dvojica kombinira z vsakim posameznim vzorcem parametra tira, kot je določeno v preglednici 12 v nadaljevanju.
When a first step assessment covering the design stage or the design and production stages is applied for by the applicant, the notified body of his choice shall issue the Intermediate Statement Verification (ISV) and the EC declaration of Intermediate Sub-system conformity shall been drawn up.
Ocena ekvivalentne koničnosti je opredeljena v tehnični dokumentaciji iz indeksa 2 Dodatka J-2.
Modules for the EC verification of subsystems:
Preglednica 11
Module SB
Konstrukcijsko določene mejne vrednosti ekvivalentne koničnosti
EC-Type Examination
Največja obratovalna hitrost vozila (km/h)
Module SD
Mejne vrednosti ekvivalentne koničnosti
EC verification based on quality management system of the production process
Preskusni pogoji
Module SF
(glej preglednico 12)
EC verification based on product verification
N. R.
Module SH1
> 60 in < 190
EC verification based on full quality management system plus design examination
vsi
The applicant shall choose one of the following combinations of modules:
≥ 190 in ≤ 230
(SB + SD) or (SB + SF) or (SH1) for each concerned subsystem (or part of subsystem).
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 in 6
The assessment shall then be performed according to the combination of modules chosen.
> 230 in ≤ 280
Where several EC verifications (e.g. against several TSIs addressing the same sub-system) require verification based on the same production assessment (module SD or SF), it is allowed to combine several SB module assessments with one production module assessment (SD or SF).
> 280 in ≤ 300
In this case, ISVs shall be issued for the design and development phases according to module SB.
1, 3, 5 in 6
The validity of the type or design examination certificate shall be indicated in accordance with the provisions for phase B of clause 7.1.3 ‘Rules related to EC verification’, of this TSI.
1 in 3
Where a particular procedure shall be used for the assessment, in addition to the requirements expressed in the clause 4.2 of this TSI, this is specified in the clause 6.2.3 below.
1 proti 20
Load conditions and weighed mass (clause 4.2.2.10)
1 proti 40
Weighed mass shall be measured, for a load condition corresponding to ‘design mass in working order’ with the exception of consumables for which there is no imposition (for example ‘dead mass’ is acceptable).
profil tirnice 60 E 1
It is permissible to derive the other load conditions by calculation.
profil tirnice 60 E 2
Where a vehicle is declared as conformant to a type (in accordance with clauses 6.2.2 and 7.1.3 of this TSI):
profil tirnice 54 E1
the weighed total vehicle mass in the load condition ‘design mass in working order’ shall not exceed by more than 3 % the declared total vehicle mass for that type which is reported in the type or design examination certificate of ‘EC’ verification and in the technical documentation described in clause 4.2.12.
Šteje se, da zahteve tega oddelka izpolnjujejo kolesne dvojice z neobrabljenima kolesnima profiloma S1002 ali GV 1/40, kot sta opredeljena v specifikaciji iz indeksa 86 Dodatka J-1, ter z razdaljo med aktivnima površinama med 1420 in 1426 mm.
additionally, for unit of maximum design speed higher than or equal to 250 km/h the mass per axle for the load condition ‘design mass under normal payload’ shall not exceed by more than 4 % the declared mass per axle for the same load condition.
Za enote, ki so projektirane za obratovanje na sistemu tirne širine 1524 mm, se profil kolesa in razdalja med aktivnima površinama koles izbereta z naslednjimi vhodnimi podatki:
Wheel load (clause 4.2.3.2.2)
Preglednica 13
Safety against derailment running on twisted track (Clause 4.2.3.4.1)
> 60 in ≤ 190
The demonstration of conformity shall be carried out in accordance with one of the methods specified in the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 83 as amended by the technical document referenced in Appendix J.2, index 2.
> 190 in ≤ 230
For units intended to be operated on 1520 mm system, alternative methods for conformity assessment are allowed.
1, 2, 3 in 4
Running dynamic behaviour — technical requirements (Clause 4.2.3.4.2 a)
3, 4, 7 in 8
For units designed to be operated on 1435 mm or 1524 mm or 1668 mm system, the demonstration of conformity shall be carried out in accordance with the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 84, clause 5.
7 in 8
The parameters described in clauses 4.2.3.4.2.1 and 4.2.3.4.2.2 shall be assessed using criteria defined in the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 84.
Šteje se, da zahteve tega oddelka izpolnjujejo kolesne dvojice z neobrabljenima kolesnima profiloma S1002 ali GV 1/40, kot sta opredeljena v specifikaciji iz indeksa 86 Dodatka J-1, ter z razdaljo med aktivnima površinama 1510 mm.
The conditions for the assessment in accordance with the specification referenced in Appendix J-1, index 84 shall be amended as per technical document referenced in Appendix J-2, index 2.
Za enote, projektirane za obratovanje na sistemu s tirno širino 1668 mm, se mejne vrednosti ekvivalentne koničnosti, opredeljene v preglednici 15, ne presežejo, kadar se konstrukcijsko določena kolesna dvojica modelira na reprezentativnem vzorcu pogojev preskusa na tirih, kot je določeno v preglednici 16.
Conformity assessment for safety requirements
Preglednica 15
The demonstration of compliance with the safety requirements expressed in the clause 4.2 shall be performed as follows:
(glej preglednico 16)
The scope of this assessment shall be strictly limited to the rolling stock design, considering that operation, test and maintenance are performed according to the rules defined by the applicant (as described in the technical file).
1 in 2
When defining the test and maintenance requirements, the safety level to be met has to be taken into account by the applicant (consistency);
profil tirnice 54 E1
the demonstration of compliance covers also test and maintenance requirements.
Šteje se, da zahteve tega oddelka izpolnjujejo kolesne dvojice z neobrabljenima kolesnima profiloma S1002 ali GV 1/40, kot sta opredeljena v specifikaciji iz indeksa 86 Dodatka J-1, ter z razdaljo med aktivnima površinama med 1653 mm in 1659 mm.
Other sub-systems and human factors (errors) shall not be considered.
Mehanske in geometrijske značilnosti kolesnih dvojic (oddelek 4.2.3.5.2.1)
All assumptions considered for the mission profile shall be clearly documented in the demonstration.
Kolesna dvojica:
The compliance with the safety requirements that are specified in clauses 4.2.3.4.2, 4.2.4.2.2, 4.2.5.3.5, 4.2.5.5.8 and 4.2.5.5.9 in terms of level of severity/consequences associated to hazardous failure scenarios shall be demonstrated by one of the two following methods:
Dokazovanje skladnosti za montažo temelji na specifikaciji iz indeksa 87 Dodatka J-1, ki določa mejne vrednosti za osno silo, ter na povezanih preskusih za verifikacijo.
Application of a harmonised risk acceptance criterion associated to the severity specified in the clause 4.2 (e.g. ‘fatalities’ for emergency braking.).
Osi:
The applicant may choose to use this method, provided that there is an available harmonized risk acceptance criterion defined in the CSM on Risk Assessment and its amendments (Commission Regulation (EC) No 352/2009 [11].The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the harmonised criterion by applying Annex I-3 of the CSM on RA.
Dokazovanje skladnosti za mehansko odpornost in značilnosti utrujanja osi je v skladu s specifikacijo iz oddelkov 4, 5 in 6 indeksa 88 Dodatka J-1 za proste osi oziroma specifikacijo iz oddelkov 4, 5 in 6 indeksa 89 Dodatka J-1 za pogonske osi.
The following principles (and their combinations) may be used for the demonstration: similarity with reference system(s); application of codes of practice; application of an explicit risk estimation (e.g. probabilistic approach).
Merila odločanja za dopustne obremenitve so opredeljena v specifikaciji iz oddelka 7 indeksa 88 Dodatka J-1 za proste osi oziroma specifikaciji iz oddelka 7 indeksa 89 Dodatka J-1 za pogonske osi.
The applicant shall designate the body for the assessment of the demonstration he will provide:
Predpostavka pogojev obremenitve za izračune se izrecno navede v tehnični dokumentaciji, kot je določeno v oddelku 4.2.12 te TSI.
the notified body selected for the RST sub-system or an assessment body as defined in the CSM on RA.
Verifikacija osi:
The demonstration shall be recognised in all Member States; or
Vzpostavljen je postopek verifikacije, s katerim se v fazi proizvodnje zagotovi, da na varnost ne morejo škodljivo vplivati nikakršne okvare zaradi morebitne spremembe mehanskih značilnosti osi.
Application of a risk evaluation and assessment in accordance with the CSM on RA, in order to define the risk acceptance criterion to be used, and demonstrate compliance to this criterion.
Preverijo se natezna trdnost materiala v osi, udarna odpornost, površinska homogenost, značilnosti materiala in čistost materiala.
The applicant may choose to use this method in any case.
Ohišja osnih ležajev/osni ležaji:
The applicant shall designate the assessment body for the assessment of the demonstration he will provide, as defined in the CSM on RA.
Dokazovanje skladnosti za mehansko odpornost in značilnosti utrujanja ležajev je v skladu s specifikacijo iz indeksa 90 Dodatka J-1.
A safety assessment report shall be provided in compliance with the requirements defined in the CSM on RA and its amendments.
Druga metoda za ocenjevanje skladnosti, ki se uporablja za kolesne dvojice, osi in kolesa, kadar standardi EN ne zajemajo predlagane tehnične rešitve:
The safety assessment report shall be taken into account by the National Safety Authority in the concerned Member State, in accordance with Section 2.5.6 of Annex I and Article 15(2) of the CSM on RA.
Kadar standardi EN ne zajemajo predlagane tehnične rešitve, je dovoljeno uporabiti druge standarde;
in case of method ‘2’, they shall also mention the ‘used risk acceptance criterion’.
mehansko odpornost,
For units designed to be operated on 1435 mm track gauge system, the wheel profile and the distance between active faces of the wheels (Dimension SR in Figure 1, § 4.2.3.5.2.1) shall be selected to ensure that the equivalent conicity limit set out in Table 11 below is not exceeded when the designed wheelset is combined with each of the sample of track parameters as specified in Table 12 below.
dopustne meje obremenitve,
The evaluation of the equivalent conicity is set out in the technical document referenced in Appendix J-2, index 2.
termomehanske značilnosti.
Table 11
Pri dokazovanju, zahtevanem zgoraj, se je možno sklicevati le na standarde, ki so javno dostopni.
Equivalent conicity design limit values
Posebni primer kolesnih dvojic, osi in ohišij osnih ležajev/ležajev, ki so proizvedeni v skladu z obstoječim načrtom: