natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to coordinate and facilitate the assessment procedures for cross-border projects, and, in particular, to conduct consultations in accordance with the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context of 25 February 1991 (Espoo-Convention), the Member States concerned may set up, on the basis of equal representation, a joint body.
Zadevne države članice lahko ustanovijo skupni organ, v katerem so enakopravno zastopane, da bi uskladile in olajšale postopke presoje za čezmejne projekte, zlasti da bi opravile posvetovanja v skladu s Konvencijo z dne 25. februarja 1991 o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje (Konvencija iz Espooja).
The mechanisms set out in Regulations (EU) No 347/2013 [6], (EU) No 1315/2013 [7] and (EU) No 1316/2013 [8] of the European Parliament and of the Council, which are relevant for Union co-financed infrastructure projects, may also facilitate the implementation of the requirements of Directive 2011/92/EU.
Mehanizmi iz uredb (EU) št. 347/2013 [6], (EU) št. 1315/2013 [7] in (EU) št. 1316/2013 [8] Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, ki se nanašajo na sofinanciranje infrastrukturnih projektov Unije, lahko olajšajo izvajanje zahtev Direktive 2011/92/EU.
Directive 2011/92/EU should also be revised in a way that ensures that environmental protection is improved, resource efficiency increased and sustainable growth supported in the Union.
Treba bi bilo tudi revidirati Direktivo 2011/92/EU, tako da bi zagotovila izboljšanje varstva okolja, povečanje učinkovitosti virov in podporo trajnostni rasti v Uniji.
To this end, the procedures it lays down should be simplified and harmonised.
Zato bi bilo treba v njej določene postopke poenostaviti in uskladiti.
Over the last decade, environmental issues, such as resource efficiency and sustainability, biodiversity protection, climate change, and risks of accidents and disasters, have become more important in policy making.
V zadnjem desetletju so okoljski problemi, kot so npr. učinkovitost in trajnost virov, varstvo biotske raznovrstnosti, podnebne spremembe in tveganja nesreč in katastrof, postali pomembnejši dejavnik pri oblikovanju politik.
They should therefore also constitute important elements in assessment and decision-making processes.
Zato bi jih bilo treba tudi uvrstiti med pomembne elemente postopkov presoje in odločanja.
In its Communication of 20 September 2011 entitled ‘Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe’, the Commission committed itself to including broader resource efficiency and sustainability considerations in the context of the revision of Directive 2011/92/EU.
Komisija se je v svojem sporočilu z dne 20. septembra 2011 z naslovom „Časovni okvir za Evropo, gospodarno z viri“ zavezala, da bo v revizijo Direktive 2011/92/EU vključila obsežnejše ugotovitve o učinkoviti in trajnostni rabi virov.
The Commission Communication of 22 September 2006 entitled ‘Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection’ and the Roadmap to a Resource-Efficient Europe underline the importance of the sustainable use of soil and the need to address the unsustainable increase of settlement areas over time (‘land take’).
Sporočilo Komisije z dne 22. septembra 2006 z naslovom „Tematska strategija za varstvo tal“ in Časovni okvir za Evropo, gospodarno z viri, poudarjata pomembnost trajnostne rabe tal in potrebo po obravnavanju netrajnostnega porasta bivalnih površin skozi leta (izkoriščanje zemljišč).
Furthermore, the final document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development held in Rio de Janeiro on 20-22 June 2012 recognises the economic and social significance of good land management, including soil, and the need for urgent action to reverse land degradation.
Poleg tega končni dokument konference Združenih narodov o trajnostnem razvoju, ki je potekala v Rio de Janeiru od 20. do 22. junija 2012, priznava gospodarsko in družbeno pomembnost dobrega upravljanja z zemljišči, vključno s prstjo, in potrebo po nujnih ukrepih za obrnitev trenda degradacije tal.
Public and private projects should therefore consider and limit their impact on land, particularly as regards land take, and on soil, including as regards organic matter, erosion, compaction and sealing; appropriate land use plans and policies at national, regional and local level are also relevant in this regard.
Javni in zasebni projekti bi zato morali upoštevati in omejevati svoje vplive na zemljišča, zlasti izkoriščanje zemljišč, in na tla, vključno z vplivi na organske snovi, erozijo, zbijanje in pozidavo; v zvezi s tem so pomembni ustrezni načrti in politike za rabo zemljišč na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni.
The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (‘the Convention’), to which the Union is party pursuant to Council Decision 93/626/EEC [9], requires assessment, as far as possible and as appropriate, of the significant adverse effects of projects on biological diversity, which is defined in Article 2 of the Convention, with a view to avoiding or minimising such effects.
Konvencija OZN o biološki raznovrstnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Konvencija), katere pogodbenica je Unija na podlagi Sklepa Sveta 93/626/EGS [9], zahteva karseda podrobno in ustrezno presojo pomembnih negativnih vplivov projektov na biološko raznovrstnost, ki je opredeljena v členu 2 Konvencije, z namenom preprečevanja ali zmanjševanja takih vplivov.
Such prior assessment of those effects should contribute to attaining the Union headline target adopted by the European Council in its conclusions of 25-26 March 2010 of halting biodiversity loss and the degradation of ecosystem services by 2020 and restoring them where feasible.
Takšna predhodna presoja teh vplivov bi morala pripomoči k doseganju naslovnega cilja Unije, ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel v svojih sklepih 25. in 26. marca 2010, namreč zaustavitve izgube biotske raznovrstnosti ter degradacije ekosistemskih storitev do leta 2020 in njihove ponovne oživitve, kjer je le možno.
The measures taken to avoid, prevent, reduce and, if possible, offset significant adverse effects on the environment, in particular on species and habitats protected under Council Directive 92/43/EEC [10] and Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [11], should contribute to avoiding any deterioration in the quality of the environment and any net loss of biodiversity, in accordance with the Union's commitments in the context of the Convention and the objectives and actions of the Union Biodiversity Strategy up to 2020 laid down in the Commission Communication of 3 May 2011 entitled ‘Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020’.
Ukrepi, ki so bili sprejeti z namenom izogibanja, preprečitve, zmanjšanja in, kjer je mogoče, izravnave pomembnih škodljivih učinkov na okolje, zlasti v zvezi z vrstami in habitati, zaščitenimi z Direktivo Sveta 92/43/EGS [10] in Direktivo 2009/147/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [11], bi morali prispevati k preprečevanju poslabšanja kakovosti okolja in vsakršne čiste izgube biotske raznovrstnosti v skladu z zavezami Unije v okviru Konvencije ter cilji in ukrepi strategije Unije za biotsko raznovrstnost do leta 2020, določenimi v sporočilu Komisije z dne 3. maja 2011 z naslovom „Naše življenjsko zavarovanje, naš naravni kapital: strategija EU za biotsko raznovrstnost do leta 2020“.
With a view to ensuring a high level of protection of the marine environment, especially species and habitats, environmental impact assessment and screening procedures for projects in the marine environment should take into account the characteristics of those projects with particular regard to the technologies used (for example seismic surveys using active sonars).
Da bi zagotovili visoko raven varstva morskega okolja, zlasti vrst in habitatov, bi morali presoja vplivov na okolje in postopki predhodne preveritve za projekte v morskem okolju upoštevati značilnosti projektov, s posebnim poudarkom na uporabljene tehnologije (na primer potresne raziskave z uporabo aktivnih sonarjev).
For this purpose, the requirements of Directive 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [12] could also facilitate the implementation of the requirements of this Directive.
V ta namen bi lahko zahteve Direktive 2013/30/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [12] olajšale tudi izvajanje zahtev te direktive.
Climate change will continue to cause damage to the environment and compromise economic development.
Podnebne spremembe bodo še naprej povzročale škodo okolju in slabile gospodarski razvoj.
In this regard, it is appropriate to assess the impact of projects on climate (for example greenhouse gas emissions) and their vulnerability to climate change.
V zvezi s tem je primerno presoditi vpliv projektov na podnebje (na primer emisije toplogrednih plinov) in njihovo ranljivost ob podnebnih spremembah.
Following the Commission Communication of 23 February 2009 entitled ‘A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters’, the Council, in its conclusions of 30 November 2009, invited the Commission to ensure that the implementation, review and further development of Union initiatives, take into consideration disaster risk prevention and management concerns as well as the United Nations Hyogo Framework for Action Programme (2005-2015) adopted on 22 January 2005, which stresses the need to put in place procedures for assessment of the disaster risk implications of major infrastructure projects.
Po sporočilu Komisije z dne 23. februarja 2009 z naslovom „Skupnostni pristop k preprečevanju naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek“ je Svet v svojih sklepih z dne 30. novembra 2009 pozval Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo izvajanje, pregled in nadaljnji razvoj spodbud Unije upoštevali preprečevanje nesreč in pomisleke glede upravljanja ter Hyoški akcijski okvir OZN za obdobje 2005–2015, sprejet 22. januarja 2005, ki poudarja potrebo po uvedbi postopkov za presojo posledic, ki jih imajo večji infrastrukturni projekti na tveganje nesreč.
In order to ensure a high level of protection of the environment, precautionary actions need to be taken for certain projects which, because of their vulnerability to major accidents, and/or natural disasters (such as flooding, sea level rise, or earthquakes) are likely to have significant adverse effects on the environment.
Da bi zagotovili visoko raven varstva okolja, je treba za nekatere projekte, za katere je verjetno, da bodo zaradi občutljivosti na hude nesreče in/ali naravne katastrofe (kot so poplave, povišanje morske gladine ali potresi) imeli pomembne negativne vplive na okolje, sprejeti previdnostne ukrepe.
For such projects, it is important to consider their vulnerability (exposure and resilience) to major accidents and/or disasters, the risk of those accidents and/or disasters occurring and the implications for the likelihood of significant adverse effects on the environment.
Pri teh projektih je pomembno upoštevati njihovo ranljivost (izpostavljenost in odpornost) ob hudih nesrečah in/ali katastrofah, tveganje za nastanek teh nesreč in/ali katastrof in posledice za verjetnost pomembnih škodljivih vplivov na okolje.
In order to avoid duplications, it should be possible to use any relevant information available and obtained through risk assessments carried out pursuant to Union legislation, such as Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and the Council [13] and Council Directive 2009/71/Euratom [14], or through relevant assessments carried out pursuant to national legislation provided that the requirements of this Directive are met.
Da bi se izognili podvajanju, bi moralo biti možno, da se lahko ustrezne dostopne informacije, pridobljene prek ocen tveganja, opravljenih na podlagi zakonodaje Unije, kot sta Direktiva 2012/18/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [13] in Direktiva Sveta 2009/71/Euratom [14], ali ustreznih ocen, opravljenih na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje, uporabijo, če so izpolnjene zahteve te direktive.
In order to better preserve historical and cultural heritage and the landscape, it is important to address the visual impact of projects, namely the change in the appearance or view of the built or natural landscape and urban areas, in environmental impact assessments.
Pravočasno objavljene okoljske informacije v zvezi z izvajanjem te direktive bi morale biti dostopne tudi v elektronski obliki, da bi okrepili dostop javnosti do informacij in preglednost.
When applying Directive 2011/92/EU, it is necessary to ensure smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, in line with the objectives set out in the Commission's Communication of 3 March 2010 entitled ‘Europe 2020 — A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’.
Zato bi morale države članice na ustrezni upravni ravni vzpostaviti vsaj osrednji portal ali dostopne točke, ki javnosti omogočajo enostaven in učinkovit dostop do informacij.
With a view to strengthening public access to information and transparency, timely environmental information with regard to the implementation of this Directive should also be accessible in electronic format.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da bi v primeru projektov ali delov projektov za obrambne namene, vključno s projekti, povezanimi z dejavnostmi zavezniških sil na ozemlju držav članic v skladu z mednarodnimi obveznostmi, uporaba Direktive 2011/92/EU lahko privedla do razkritja relevantnih zaupnih informacij, ki bi negativno vplivale na namene obrambe.
Member States should therefore establish at least a central portal or points of access, at the appropriate administrative level, that allow the public to access that information easily and effectively.
Zato bi bilo treba uvesti določbo, ki bo državam članicam dovolila, da v takšnih primerih, kadar je ustrezno, navedene direktive ne uporabljajo.
Experience has shown that in cases of projects, or parts of projects, serving defence purposes, including projects related to activities by allied forces on the territory of Member States in accordance with international obligations, the application of Directive 2011/92/EU could result in the disclosure of relevant confidential information which would undermine defence purposes.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da ima skladnost z Direktivo 2011/92/EU pri projektih, katerih edini namen je civilna zaščita, lahko negativne učinke tudi na okolje, zato bi bilo treba uvesti določbo, ki bo državam članicam dovolila, da v takšnih primerih, kakor je ustrezno, navedene direktive ne uporabljajo.
Provision should therefore be made to authorise Member States not to apply that Directive in such cases, where appropriate.
Države članice imajo za izvajanje Direktive 2011/92/EU v zvezi z vključevanjem presoj vplivov na okolje v nacionalne postopke več možnosti.
Experience has shown that, as regards projects having as their sole purpose the response to cases of civil emergency, compliance with Directive 2011/92/EU could have adverse effects, inter alia, on the environment, and provision should therefore be made to authorise Member States not to apply that Directive in such cases, where appropriate.
Zato se elementi teh nacionalnih postopkov lahko razlikujejo.
Member States have several options for implementing Directive 2011/92/EU as regards the integration of environmental impact assessments into national procedures.
Zaradi tega je lahko utemeljen sklep, s katerim pristojni organ zaključi pregled okoljskih vidikov projekta, del integriranega postopka izdaje soglasja za izvedbo ali se lahko vključi v drug zavezujoč sklep, ki je potreben, da se izpolnijo cilji te direktive.
Accordingly, the elements of those national procedures can vary.
Da bi zagotovili visoko raven varstva okolja in človeškega zdravja, bi morali postopki predhodne preveritve in presoje vplivov na okolje upoštevati vplive celotnega zadevnega projekta, vključno, kjer je to ustrezno, z njegovo površino in podzemljem, med gradnjo, obratovanjem in, kjer je to ustrezno, rušenjem.
Due to this fact, the reasoned conclusion by which the competent authority finalises its examination of the environmental impact of the project may be part of an integrated development consent procedure or may be incorporated in another binding decision required in order to comply with the aims of this Directive.
Da bi dosegli celovito presojo neposrednih in posrednih učinkov projekta na okolje, bi morali pristojni organi opraviti analizo s preučitvijo vsebine informacij, ki jih predloži nosilec projekta in ki se pridobijo v okviru posvetovanj, ter po potrebi upoštevati dodatne informacije.
In order to ensure a high level of protection of the environment and human health, screening procedures and environmental impact assessments should take account of the impact of the whole project in question, including, where relevant, its subsurface and underground, during the construction, operational and, where relevant, demolition phases.
Pri projektih, sprejetih s posebnim nacionalnim zakonodajnim aktom, bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da se cilji te direktive, povezani z javnimi posvetovanji, dosežejo prek zakonodajnega postopka.
With a view to reaching a complete assessment of the direct and indirect effects of a project on the environment, the competent authority should undertake an analysis by examining the substance of the information provided by the developer and received through consultations, as well as considering any supplementary information, where appropriate.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba objektivnost pristojnih organov.
In the case of projects adopted by a specific act of national legislation, Member States should ensure that the objectives of this Directive relating to public consultation are achieved through the legislative process.
Nasprotja interesov se med drugim lahko preprečijo s funkcionalno ločitvijo pristojnega organa od nosilca projekta.
The objectivity of the competent authorities should be ensured.
Če je pristojni organ tudi nosilec projekta, bi morale države članice v okviru svoje ureditve upravnih pristojnosti uvesti v zvezi z opravljanjem nalog na podlagi Direktive 2011/92/EU vsaj ustrezno ločitev funkcij, pri katerih obstaja nasprotje interesov.
Conflicts of interest could be prevented by, inter alia, a functional separation of the competent authority from the developer.
Opredeliti bi bilo treba informacije, ki jih mora nosilec projekta predložiti, da bo pristojni organ lahko določil, ali je projekte iz Priloge II k Direktivi 2011/92/EU ter njihove spremembe ali podaljšanje treba predložiti v presojo vplivov na okolje (postopek predhodnega preverjanja), pri čemer bi se bilo treba osredotočiti na ključne vidike, ki pristojnemu organu omogočajo, da to določi.
In cases where the competent authority is also the developer, Member States should at least implement, within their organisation of administrative competences, an appropriate separation between conflicting functions of those authorities performing the duties arising from Directive 2011/92/EU.
Odločitev o tem bi morala biti na voljo javnosti.
In order to enable the competent authority to determine whether projects listed in Annex II to Directive 2011/92/EU, their changes or extensions, are to be subject to an environmental impact assessment (screening procedure), the information which the developer is required to supply should be specified, focussing on the key aspects that allow the competent authority to make its determination.
Postopek predhodnega preverjanja bi moral zagotoviti, da se presoja vplivov na okolje zahteva samo pri projektih, za katere je verjetno, da bodo pomembno vplivali na okolje.
That determination should be made available to the public.
Izbirna merila iz Priloge III k Direktivi 2011/92/EU, ki jih države članice upoštevajo pri določanju, katere projekte je treba predložiti v presojo vplivov na okolje, na podlagi njihovih pomembnih vplivov na okolje, bi bilo treba prilagoditi in pojasniti.
The screening procedure should ensure that an environmental impact assessment is only required for projects likely to have significant effects on the environment.
Na primer, izkušnje so pokazale, da je pri projektih, ki uporabljajo ali prizadenejo dragocene vire, projektih, ki se predlagajo za okoljsko občutljive lokacije, ali projektih s potencialno nevarnimi ali nepopravljivimi vplivi velikokrat verjetno, da bodo pomembno vplivali na okolje.
The selection criteria laid down in Annex III to Directive 2011/92/EU, which are to be taken into account by the Member States in order to determine which projects are to be subject to environmental impact assessment on the basis of their significant effects on the environment, should be adapted and clarified.
Pri določanju, ali obstaja verjetnost, da bi projekt pomembno vplival na okolje, bi pristojni organi morali določiti najpomembnejša merila, ki jih je treba upoštevati, in upoštevati morebitne dodatne informacije, ki so na voljo po drugih presojah, ki jih zahteva zakonodaja Unije, da se postopek predhodne preveritve učinkovito in pregledno uporabi.
For instance, experience has shown that projects using or affecting valuable resources, projects proposed for environmentally sensitive locations, or projects with potentially hazardous or irreversible effects are often likely to have significant effects on the environment.
V zvezi s tem je ustrezno določiti vsebino odločitve o predhodnem preverjanju, zlasti kadar se presoja vplivov na okolje ne bo zahtevala.
When determining whether significant effects on the environment are likely to be caused by a project, the competent authorities should identify the most relevant criteria to be considered and should take into account information that could be available following other assessments required by Union legislation in order to apply the screening procedure effectively and transparently.
Poleg tega upoštevanje spontanih pripomb, ki bi lahko prišle iz drugih virov, kot so predstavniki javnosti ali javnih organov, čeprav na ravni postopka predhodne preveritve posvetovanje ni potrebno, predstavlja dobro upravno prakso.
In this regard, it is appropriate to specify the content of the screening determination, in particular where no environmental impact assessment is required.
Da bi izboljšali kakovost presoje vplivov na okolje, poenostavili postopke in racionalizirali postopek odločanja, bi moral pristojni organ, če to zahteva nosilec projekta, izdati mnenje o obsegu in ravni podrobnosti informacij v zvezi z okoljem, ki jih je treba predložiti v obliki poročila o presoji vplivov na okolje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: določanje obsega).
Moreover, taking into account unsolicited comments that might have been received from other sources, such as members of the public or public authorities, even though no formal consultation is required at the screening stage, constitutes good administrative practice.
Poročilo o presoji vplivov na okolje, ki ga mora za projekt pripraviti nosilec projekta, bi moralo vključevati opis razumnih alternativ, ki jih je preučil nosilec projekta in ki so relevantne za ta projekt, vključno z ustreznim opisom verjetnega razvoja obstoječega stanja okolja v primeru, da se projekt ne bi izvedel (osnovni scenarij), s čimer bi izboljšali kakovost postopka presoje vplivov na okolje in omogočili upoštevanje okoljskih vidikov že v zgodnjih fazah oblikovanja projekta.
In order to improve the quality of an environmental impact assessment, to simplify the procedures and to streamline the decision-making process, the competent authority should, where requested by the developer, issue an opinion on the scope and level of detail of the environmental information to be submitted in the form of an environmental impact assessment report (‘scoping’).
Podatki in informacije, ki jih v poročilo o presoji vplivov na okolje vključi nosilec projekta, v skladu s Prilogo IV k Direktivi 2011/92/EU, bi morali biti popolni in dovolj visoke kakovosti.