natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is likely to be the case also for the two other producers in view of no available information on the investments in new machinery, which could for instance allow the production of the product concerned of a bigger diameter.
To verjetno velja tudi za druga dva proizvajalca glede na to, da ni dostopnih podatkov o naložbah v nove stroje, ki bi lahko na primer omogočali proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka večjega premera.
Furthermore, the limited competitive pressure of the exporting producers from the Russian Federation seems also to be confirmed by the presence of the Union producers on the Russian market.
Poleg tega se zdi, da omejeni pritisk konkurence proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Ruske federacije potrjuje tudi prisotnost proizvajalcev Unije na ruskem trgu.
According to the official Russian customs statistics the Union producers’ exports of the like product to the Russian Federation represented 30 % of all imports of the like product to the Russian market in RIP, making of the Union producers the largest exporter on the Russian market.
Glede na uradne ruske carinske statistične podatke je izvoz podobnega izdelka proizvajalcev Unije v Rusko federacijo predstavljal 30 % vsega uvoza podobnega izdelka na ruski trg v OPP, s čimer so proizvajalci Unije največji izvoznik na ruski trg.
In reply to the final disclosure the applicant argued that the projected GDP growth of Russia (in the range of 3 %) is rather moderate and will not allow for further development of the Russian SWR market.
V odzivu na končno razkritje je vložnik trdil, da je napovedana rast BDP v Rusiji (približno 3 %) zgolj zmerna in ne bo omogočila nadaljnjega razvoja ruskega trga železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov.
Consequently, the Russian market might not be able to absorb additional volumes of the like product.
Posledično naj ruski trg ne bi zmogel absorbirati dodatnih količin podobnega izdelka.
In this respect it is noted that the Russian GDP growth during the period considered, i.e. from 2009 to the end of the IP, was lower than the forecasted growth for the year 2014 and nevertheless allowed for the growth of the SWR market in Russia by 38 %.
S tem v zvezi se upošteva, da je rast ruskega BDP v zadevnem obdobju, tj. od leta 2009 do konca OP, nižja od napovedane rasti za leto 2014 ter da je kljub temu zadoščala za rast trga železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov v Rusiji za 38 %.
Therefore the argument has been rejected.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
The same party also pointed to the new types of products that the cooperating exporting producer has recently developed (in cooperation with its subsidiary based in the Union) and claimed that this confirms the investments made by this producer in the period considered.
Ista stran je opozorila tudi na nove vrste blaga, ki jih je pred kratkim razvil sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik (v sodelovanju s svojo hčerinsko družbo s sedežem v Uniji), in trdila, da to potrjuje naložbe, ki jih je ta proizvajalec v obravnavanem obdobju izvedel.
This fact however does not contradict the finding on the cooperating producer’s inability to produce all type of ropes (especially SWR in the high end of the market).
To dejstvo pa kljub temu ne ovrže ugotovitve, da sodelujoči proizvajalec ni zmožen proizvajati vseh vrst vrvi (zlasti železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov na trgu visokokakovostnih izdelkov).
The attractiveness of the Union market should also be seen in the context of some acquisitions of Union producers by the Russians exporting producers.
Privlačnost trga Unije je treba obravnavati tudi z vidika prevzemov nekaterih proizvajalcev Unije, ki so jih izvedli nekateri ruski proizvajalci izvozniki.
Indeed, two Russian producers currently own subsidiaries based in the Union.
Dva ruska proizvajalca imata trenutno v lasti hčerinske družbe s sedežem v Uniji.
The verification visit to the EU based subsidiary of the cooperating exporter revealed that its sales were concluded mainly on the European market and that the related sales between the cooperating producer and this subsidiary remained limited in RIP.
Preveritveni obisk na sedežu hčerinske družbe sodelujočega izvoznika s sedežem v EU je pokazal, da je bila prodaja izvedena predvsem na evropskem trgu in da je bila povezana prodaja med sodelujočim proizvajalcem in hčerinskim podjetjem v OPP še naprej omejena.
On the basis of the data of the cooperating exporter, it has to be noted that the Russian export volume of the product concerned to third countries exceeded four times the export volume to the Union in RIP.
Na podlagi podatkov sodelujočega izvoznika je treba opozoriti, da je obseg izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Rusije v tretje države štirikrat presegel obseg izvoza v Unijo v OPP.
The export prices of the cooperating exporting producer to third countries were found to be on average lower than its domestic sales price in the Russian Federation, but on average at higher levels than the export prices to the Union market.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so izvozne cene sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika za izvoz v tretje države v povprečju nižje od domačih prodajnih cen v Ruski federaciji, vendar so v povprečju višje od izvoznih cen za izvoz na trg Unije.
This allows a conclusion that the export sales to third countries’ markets are more attractive than the sales to the Union market.
Na podlagi tega se sklepa, da je izvozna prodaja na trge tretjih držav privlačnejša kot na trg Unije.
In this context, the existence of long established sales channels with the Commonwealth of Independent States’ (CIS) markets is also noted.
V povezavi s tem se upošteva tudi že precej prej vzpostavljene prodajne poti s trgi Skupnosti neodvisnih držav (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SND).
In reply to the final disclosure the applicant argued that the export prices of the Russian producers to the third markets are in fact lower than the export prices to the Union.
V odzivu na končno razkritje je vložnik trdil, da so bile izvozne cene za ruske proizvajalce na tretjih trgih v resnici nižje od izvoznih cen za Unijo.
A comparison between average export prices to Ukraine and some European countries based allegedly on the Russian customs statistics was evoked.
Navedena je bila primerjava med povprečnimi izvoznimi cenami v Ukrajino in v nekatere evropske države, ki naj bi temeljila na ruskih carinskih statističnih podatkih.
No original data underlying the comparison was submitted.
Izvirni podatki, na katerih je bila izvedena primerjava, niso bili priloženi.
In this respect it is noted that the comparison of the price difference between Russian export prices to the Union and to third markets carried out in the investigation was based on the verified questionnaire data of the cooperating exporting producer.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je primerjava cenovnih razlik med ruskimi izvoznimi cenami za izvoz v Unijo in tistimi za izvoz na trge tretjih držav temeljila na preverjenih podatkih iz vprašalnika sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika.
Such price comparison was made at ex-works level taking into account the differences between the product types and the level of trade.
Ta primerjava cen je bila izvedena na ravni franko tovarna in je upoštevala razlike med vrstami proizvodov in ravnjo trgovanja.
The average prices submitted by the applicant do not reflect the complexity of the price components and ranges existing in the SWR market and resulting from a significant number of different products and different level of trade.
Povprečna cena, ki jo je predložil vložnik, ne odraža kompleksnosti cenovnih komponent in razponov na trgu železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov, ki izhaja iz števila različnih izdelkov in različnih ravni trgovanja.
The same party argued that the level of export volume of the Union industry to the Russian Federation is irrelevant in this case and rather pointed to the increased imports from the People’s Republic of China to the Russian Federation and the need to take them into consideration in the analysis as they constitute a competitive threat to the presence of the Russian producers on the Russian and CIS markets.
Ista stran je trdila, da raven obsega izvoza industrije Unije v Rusko federacijo v tem primeru ni bistvena, ter opozorila na povečan uvoz iz Ljudske republike Kitajske v Rusko federacijo, ki bi ga bilo potrebno upoštevati pri analizi, saj predstavlja konkurenčno nevarnost za prisotnost ruskih proizvajalcev na ruskem trgu in trgih SND.
In this regard the fact that the Union producers remain the export leaders on the Russian market is relevant as it confirms, inter alia, the fact that the Russian producers are unable to produce all types of SWR for which demand exists on the Russian market.
Dejstvo, da proizvajalci Unije ostajajo vodilni izvozniki na ruski trg, na tem mestu ni relevantno, saj med drugim potrjuje dejstvo, da ruski proizvajalci ne morejo proizvajati vseh vrst železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov, za katere na ruskem trgu obstaja povpraševanje.
As regards the Chinese exports to the Russian Federation, it is noted that they grew in parallel to the rapid growth of the demand of the Russian market.
Glede kitajskega izvoza v Rusko federacijo je treba upoštevati, da ta raste vzporedno s hitro rastjo povpraševanja na ruskem trgu.
No information was provided, e.g. regarding Chinese export price levels to the Russian Federation or CIS countries or the characteristics of the imported product under investigation to allow for a further analysis.
Podatki glede ravni cen kitajskega izvoza v Rusko federacijo in na trge SND ali značilnosti uvoženega izdelka v preiskavi, ki bi omogočili nadaljnjo analizo, niso bili posredovani.
Finally, it is noted that according to the Russian customs statistics the Russian producers of the product concerned remained the leader on their SWR domestic market in the RIP and the total imports to this market accounted for only about 15 % of the Russian SWR market.
Končno je treba opozoriti, da so ruski proizvajalci glede na ruske carinske statistične podatke v OPP še vedno vodilni proizvajalci na domačem trgu železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov ter da je celoten uvoz na ta trg predstavljal le približno 15 % ruskega trga železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov.
Production capacity and excess capacity available for exports in the Russian Federation
Proizvodna zmogljivost in presežna zmogljivost, ki sta na voljo za izvoz v Ruski federaciji
According to the request for review, the production capacity of all Russian exporting producers was 115000 tonnes.
Glede na zahtevek za pregled je proizvodna zmogljivost ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznika znašala 115000 ton.
During the investigation the applicant reassessed the Russian production capacity to be in a range between 220000 and 250000 tonnes, which was however not supported by any evidence.
Med preiskavo je vložnik v ponovni oceni navedel, da je ruska proizvodna zmogljivost med 220000 in 250000 tonami, vendar navedb ni podprl z dokazi.
On the basis of the verified data of the cooperating exporter, the data submitted by a second known producer and the data contained in the request on the third producer, the production capacity of all Russian producers of the product concerned was established at the level of around 158000 tonnes.
Raven proizvodne zmogljivosti vseh ruskih proizvajalcev zadevnega izdelka je bila določena na približno 158000 ton na podlagi preverjenih podatkov sodelujočega izvoznika, podatkov, ki jih je predložil drugi znani proizvajalec, in podatkov iz zahtevka o tretjem proizvajalca.
In this context, it is noted that the production capacity of the cooperating exporting producer underwent structural adjustments in the period considered, as a result of which one production workshop was closed.
V zvezi s tem je treba upoštevati, da je proizvodna zmogljivost sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v tem obdobju doživela strukturne prilagoditve, zaradi česar je bil en proizvodni obrat zaprt.
In reply to the final disclosure one party argued that some machinery from the closed production workshop was transferred to another production site of the cooperating producer.
V odzivu na končno razkritje je ena stran trdila, da so bili nekateri stroji iz zaprte proizvodne delavnice premeščeni v drug proizvodni obrat sodelujočega proizvajalca.
However, no evidence was provided to support this claim.
Vendar dokazi, ki bi podprli to trditev, niso bili priloženi.
In this respect it is confirmed that the evidence gathered during the investigation confirms that the cooperating producer underwent structural adjustments in the period considered, which included scrapping of some machinery in all three production sites and closure of one production workshop.
V zvezi s tem se potrdi, da podatki, zbrani med preiskavo, dokazujejo, da je sodelujoči proizvajalec v obravnavanem obdobju izvajal strukturne prilagoditve, ki so vključevale razrez nekaterih strojev na vseh treh lokacijah proizvodnje in zaprtje enega proizvodnega obrata.
At the same time it cannot be excluded that certain machinery from the closed production workshop was transferred to the remaining ones.
Hkrati ni mogoče izključiti, da so bili nekateri stroji iz zaprtih proizvodnih obratov premeščeni v preostale obrate.
In any event, this does not change the estimation of the production capacity of this producer and of Russia in total, which the party did not contest.
V nobenem primeru pa to dejstvo ne spreminja ocene proizvodne zmogljivosti tega proizvajalca ali Rusije v celoti, glede česar stranka ni ugovarjala.
Regarding the question of capacity utilisation and excess capacity, further to the data of two producers, in the absence of any precise information on the capacity utilisation of the third producer it was assumed that its capacity utilisation was in the range of the two other producers, i.e. 90 % in RIP.
V pomanjkanju natančnih podatkov o izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti tretjega proizvajalca se je na podlagi podatkov preostalih dveh proizvajalcev domnevalo, da je bila izkoriščenost zmogljivosti tretjega proizvajalca enaka izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti drugih dveh proizvajalcev, tj. 90 % v OPP.
Considering the above, it was concluded that the total spare capacity in the Russian Federation is in the range of 17000 tonnes.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je bilo sklenjeno, da je celotna neizkoriščena zmogljivost v Ruski federaciji znašala približno 17000 ton.
This corresponded to about 8 % of the Union consumption in RIP.
To je ustrezalo približno 8 % potrošnje Unije v OPP.
In view of the findings that exports from the Russian Federation are still being dumped during the RIP, there is a likelihood of continuation of dumping on the Union market in case the current anti-dumping measures are removed.
Na podlagi ugotovitev je mogoče skleniti, da pri izvozu iz Ruske federacije med OPP še obstaja damping in da bi se na trgu Unije ob ukinitvi sedanjih protidampinških ukrepov verjetno nadaljeval.
However, the following points should be highlighted.
Vendar je treba izpostaviti naslednje točke.
Firstly, there is a limited spare capacity available in the Russian Federation, which may be absorbed by the fast growing demand on the domestic market.
Prvič, obstoječo omejeno neizkoriščeno zmogljivost v Ruski federaciji bi lahko absorbiralo hitro naraščajoče povpraševanje na domačem trgu.
Secondly, the Russian producers do not possess capacities to deliver all types of ropes and therefore their competitive pressure on the Union market is limited.
Drugič, ruski proizvajalci nimajo zmogljivosti za proizvodnjo vseh vrst vrvi, zato je njihov konkurenčni pritisk na trgu Unije omejen.
Thirdly, two of three known exporting producers have their fully owned subsidiaries in the Union producing the like product.
Tretjič, dva od treh znanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v celoti nadzirata svoji hčerinski družbi v Uniji, ki proizvajata podobni izdelek.
Based on the information received from the subsidiary of the cooperating exporting producer, it can be seen that the like product produced by the subsidiary is sold primarily on the Union market, while the exporting producer produces and sells the like product mostly for the Russian market.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je posredovala hčerinska družba sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, je razvidno, da se podobni izdelek, ki ga proizvaja hčerinska družba, prodaja predvsem na trgu Unije, medtem ko proizvajalec izvoznik proizvaja in prodaja svoj podobni izdelek večinoma za ruski trg.
In addition, the Russian exporting producers have strong commercial links with the third country markets, in particular the CIS markets, which are more attractive for the Russian exporters because on average the prices charged in those markets are higher than prices charged in the Union.
Poleg tega imajo ruski proizvajalci izvozniki močne komercialne povezave s trgi tretjih držav, zlasti trgi SND, ki so zanje privlačnejši, saj so cene, zaračunane na teh trgih, v povprečju višje kot cene, zaračunane v Uniji.
On this basis it was concluded that the imports of the product concerned from the Russian Federation are unlikely to grow substantially should the measures be allowed to lapse.
Glede na to je bilo sklenjeno, da se uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Ruske federacije v primeru izteka ukrepov verjetno ne bi občutno povečal.
During the RIP, SWR are manufactured by over 30 Union producers.
Železne ali jeklene vrvi in kable je v OPP proizvajalo več kot trideset proizvajalcev Unije.
The output of those producers (established on the basis of the information collected from the cooperating producers and for the other Union producers on the data from the applicant) is therefore deemed to constitute the Union production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se šteje, da proizvodnja teh proizvajalcev (določena na podlagi informacij, ki so jih predložili sodelujoči proizvajalci, za druge proizvajalce Unije pa na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je predložil vložnik) predstavlja proizvodnjo Unije v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
As explained in recital 12, due to the large number of Union producers, a sample was selected.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 12, je bil zaradi velikega števila proizvajalcev Unije izbran vzorec.
the macroeconomic elements (production, capacity, sales volume, market share, growth, employment, productivity, average unit prices, magnitude of dumping) were assessed, at the level of the whole Union production, on the basis of information collected from the cooperating producers, from Eurostat data and, for the other Union producers, an estimate based on the data from the applicant was used,
makroekonomski elementi (proizvodnja, zmogljivost, obseg prodaje, tržni delež, rast, zaposlenost, produktivnost, povprečne cene na enoto ter obseg dampinga) so bili ocenjeni na ravni celotne proizvodnje Unije, in sicer na podlagi podatkov, pridobljenih od sodelujočih proizvajalcev in Eurostata, za druge proizvajalce Unije pa na podlagi ocene, ki je temeljila na podatkih vložnika,
the analysis of microeconomic elements (i.e. stocks, wages, profitability, return on investments, cash flow, ability to raise capital and investments) was carried out for the sampled Union producers on the basis of their information which was verified.
analiza mikroekonomskih elementov (tj. zaloge, plače, dobičkonosnost, donosnost naložb, denarni tok ter zmožnost zbiranja kapitala in možnosti za naložbe) je bila za vzorčene proizvajalce Unije opravljena na podlagi njihovih informacij, ki so bile preverjene.
Union consumption increased by 8 % from 195426 tonnes to 211380 tonnes between 2009 and the RIP.
Potrošnja Unije se je med letom 2009 in OPP povečala za 8 %, in sicer s 195426 ton na 211380 ton.
Current imports from the Russian Federation
Trenutni uvoz iz Ruske federacije
Volume, market share and prices of imports from the Russian Federation
Obseg, tržni delež in cene uvoza iz Ruske federacije
According to Eurostat data, the volume of imports of the product concerned originating in the Russian Federation increased from 2005 tonnes to 2343 tonnes between 2009 and the RIP.
Glede na podatke Eurostata se je obseg uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Ruske federacije med letom 2009 in OPP povečal z 2005 ton na 2343 ton.
Despite this increase, these volumes are lower than the imports from the Russian Federation during the last investigation, where the imports were 2908 tonnes for 2005 and 3323 tonnes for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006 (last RIP).
Kljub povečanju pa je obseg uvoza iz Ruske federacije nižji kot v zadnji preiskavi, ko je obseg uvoza znašal 2908 ton za leto 2005 in 3323 ton za obdobje od 1. julija 2005 do 30. junija 2006 (zadnji OPP).
Moreover, since the end of the RIP, imports from Russia show a decreasing trend (down by 20 %).
Poleg tega uvoz iz Rusije od konca OPP kaže padajoč trend (20 % zmanjšanje).
The market share of the Russian imports was 1,03 % in 2009 and 1,11 % in the RIP.
Tržni delež ruskega uvoza je znašal 1,03 % v letu 2009 in 1,11 % v OPP.
As far as import prices are concerned, they have increased steadily by 12 % over the period considered.
Uvozne cene so se v obravnavanem obdobju postopno povečale za 12 %.
Import (in tonnes)
Uvoz (v tonah)
Price undercutting was established using the export prices of the cooperating Russian producer, without anti-dumping duty, and was found to range from 54,7 % to 69,0 % depending on the product types with a weighted average undercutting margin of 63,4 %.
Nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen je bilo določeno z uporabo izvoznih cen sodelujočega ruskega proizvajalca brez protidampinške dajatve, pri čemer je bilo ugotovljeno, da sega od 54,7 % do 69,0 %, odvisno od vrste izdelka, s tehtano povprečno stopnjo nelojalnega nižanja prodajnih cen 63,4 %.
However, in view of the low import volumes from the Russian Federation and the numerous different types of SWR that exists, the price undercutting could only be established on the basis of very few identical product types with low volumes (19,9 tonnes).
Glede na majhen obseg uvoza iz Ruske federacije in številne različne vrste železnih ali jeklenih vrvi in kablov je bilo nelojalno nižanje prodajnih cen mogoče določiti zgolj na podlagi zelo malo identičnih vrst izdelkov z majhnim obsegom (19,9 ton).
Therefore, the undercutting margin may only be considered to be indicative.
Zato se šteje, da je stopnja nelojalnega nižanja cen zgolj indikativna.
Volume, market share and prices of imports from other countries
Obseg, tržni delež in cene uvoza iz drugih držav
Imports from countries other than the Russian Federation have increased by 10,6 % over the period considered, which is higher than the increase in consumption on the Union market (+ 8 %).
Uvoz iz drugih držav razen Ruske federacije se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 10,6 %, kar je več od povečanja potrošnje na trgu Unije (+ 8 %).
Despite the gain of Union market share by countries other than the Russian Federation, the respective market shares can be considered as being stable.
Kljub temu, da so druge države, z izjemo Ruske federacije, povečale tržni delež v Uniji, se lahko šteje, da so ti deleži stabilni.
The main exporting countries during the RIP were South Korea with 16 % market share followed by the PRC (1,78 %), Thailand with about 1,65 % market share, and the Russian Federation (see above, 1,11 % market share) while the Union industry market share was close to 60 %.
Glavne države izvoznice med OPP so bile Južna Koreja s 16 % tržnim deležem, sledile so LRK (1,78 %), Tajska (približno 1,65 %) in Ruska federacija (1,11 %, glej zgoraj), medtem ko je tržni delež industrije Unije znašal skoraj 60 %.
Countries/Imports in tonnes
Države/Uvoz (v tonah)
(excluding the Russian Federation)
(razen Ruske federacije)
Total imports
Uvoz skupaj
(including the Russian Federation)
(vključno z uvozom iz Ruske federacije)
The overall average prices of imports of the like product from other countries remained stable and unchanged during the period considered and undercut Union industry prices on average by 57 %.
Skupne povprečne cene uvoza podobnega izdelka iz drugih držav so ostale stabilne in nespremenjene v obravnavanem obdobju in so bile nelojalno nižje od cen industrije Unije v povprečju za 57 %.
Situation of the Union Industry
Položaj industrije Unije