natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Given the spare capacity identified during the investigation, the saturation of other export markets combined with the attractiveness of the Union market, Delta would in all likelihood try to regain its substantial market share in the Union which was lost after imposition of the measures in force.
Glede na proste zmogljivosti, ki so bile ugotovljene med preiskavo, zasičenost drugih izvoznih trgov in privlačnost trga Unije, bi Delta po vsej verjetnosti poskušala ponovno pridobiti svoj znaten tržni delež v Uniji, ki je bil po uvedbi veljavnih ukrepov izgubljen.
As concluded above, for Delta to regain market share it would need to export at dumped prices.
Kot je ugotovljeno zgoraj, bi morala Delta za ponovno pridobitev tržnega deleža izvažati po dampinških cenah.
Consequently, in the absence of anti-dumping duties on imports of EMD originating in South Africa, any recurrence of dumped imports would exercise an even stronger price pressure on the Union industry and in all likelihood cause material injury.
Zato bi ob odsotnosti protidampinških dajatev na izvoz EMD s poreklom iz Južne Afrike ponovitev dampinškega uvoza še povečala pritisk na cene industrije Unije in po vsej verjetnosti povzročila znatno škodo.
The repeal of the measures would in all likelihood result in a recurrence of dumped imports from South Africa resulting in a downwards pressure on Union industry prices and a worsening of its economic situation.
Odprava ukrepov bi po vsej verjetnosti povzročila ponovni pojav dampinškega uvoza iz Južne Afrike, ki bi povzročil pritisk navzdol na cene industrije Unije ter poslabšanje njenega gospodarskega položaja.
The repeal of measures against South Africa would therefore likely result in a recurrence of injury due to the likely exacerbation of the already fragile and vulnerable situation in which the Union industry was currently found to be.
Odprava ukrepov proti Južni Afriki bi zato verjetno povzročila ponovitev škode zaradi verjetnega poslabšanja že tako šibkega in ranljivega položaja, v katerem se industrija Unije trenutno nahaja.
Under Article 21 of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined whether maintaining the existing anti-dumping measures against South Africa would be against the interest of the Union as a whole.
V skladu s členom 21 osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila, ali bi bila ohranitev veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov proti Južni Afriki v nasprotju z interesom Unije kot celote.
The determination of the Union interest was based on an appreciation of all the various interests concerned.
Določitev interesa Unije je temeljila na oceni vseh različnih zadevnih interesov.
In the original investigation the imposition of measures was considered not to be against the interest of the Union.
V prvotni preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da uvedba ukrepov ni v nasprotju z interesom Unije.
As this investigation is a review, it analyses a situation in which anti-dumping measures have already been in place, thereby allowing the assessment of any undue negative impact on the parties concerned by the current anti-dumping measures.
Ker je sedanja preiskava pregled, analizira dejansko stanje, v katerem že veljajo protidampinški ukrepi, s čimer omogoča oceno kakršnega koli negativnega učinka trenutno veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov na zadevne stranke.
Despite the conclusions on the likelihood of recurrence of injurious dumping, the Commission examined whether compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Union interest to maintain measures against imports of EMD originating in South Africa.
Kljub sklepom o verjetnosti ponovitve škodljivega dampinga je Komisija preverila, ali obstajajo tehtni razlogi, ki bi vodili v zaključek, da ni v interesu Unije, da ohrani ukrepe proti uvozu EMD iz Južne Afrike.
Although the anti-dumping measures in force prevented dumped imports from entering the Union market, the Union industry is still in a fragile and vulnerable situation, as confirmed by the negative trends of some key injury indicators.
Čeprav so veljavni protidampinški ukrepi preprečevali dampinški uvoz na trgu Unije, je industrija Unije še vedno šibka in ranljiva, kot so potrdili negativni trendi nekaterih ključnih kazalnikov škode.
Should the measures be allowed to lapse, it is likely that the current situation of the Union industry will continue and further deteriorate given the likely influx of substantial volumes of dumped imports from South Africa.
Če bo dovoljena odprava ukrepov, je verjetno, da se bo trenutni položaj industrije Unije nadaljeval in še poslabšal glede na verjetni pritok velikih količin dampinškega uvoza iz Južne Afrike.
This influx would cause, amongst others, loss of market share, decrease in sales price, decrease in capacity utilisation and in general a serious deterioration of the Union industry’s financial situation.
Ta pritok bi med drugim povzročil izgubo tržnega deleža, znižanje prodajnih cen, zmanjšanje izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti in na splošno resno poslabšanje finančnega položaja industrije Unije.
It is therefore clear that the maintenance of anti-dumping measures against South Africa would not be against the interest of the Union industry.
Zato je jasno, da ohranitev protidampinških ukrepov proti Južni Afriki ne bi bila v nasprotju z interesi industrije Unije.
In the original investigation it was found that the impact of the imposition of measures was not likely to have a serious negative effect on the situation of importers in the Union.
V prvotni preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da učinek uvedbe ukrepov ni imel večjega negativnega učinka na položaj uvoznikov v Uniji.
Bearing in mind that there is no evidence suggesting that the measures in force have considerably affected importers, it can be concluded that the continuation of measures will not negatively affect the Union importers to any significant extent.
Glede na to, da ni dokazov o bistvenem vplivu veljavnih ukrepov na uvoznike, je mogoče skleniti, da nadaljevanje ukrepov ne bo znatno negativno vplivalo na uvoznike Unije.
All known users of EMD in the Union (used by battery producers as raw material) were contacted.
Vzpostavljeni so bili stiki z vsemi znanimi uporabniki EMD v Uniji (proizvajalci baterij uporabljajo EMD kot surovino).
Replies were received from two companies belonging to the same multinational group.
Komisija je prejela odgovore od dveh družb, ki pripadata isti multinacionalni skupini.
In the original investigation two additional battery producers cooperated, which opposed the imposition of measures.
V prvotni preiskavi sta sodelovala dva dodatna proizvajalca baterij, ki sta nasprotovala uvedbi ukrepov.
The cooperating user explained the difficult economic situation faced by battery producers in the Union due to the downward pressure on prices exerted by their main customers (retailers), and the consequent risk of loss of jobs.
Sodelujoči uporabnik je pojasnil težke gospodarske razmere, s katerimi se soočajo proizvajalci baterij v Uniji zaradi pritiska na nižanje cen, ki ga izvajajo njihove glavne stranke (prodajalci na drobno), in posledično tveganje za izgubo delovnih mest.
However, it could not provide any explanations or arguments as to why and how the termination of the measures against imports of EMD from South Africa would improve the situation.
Vendar pa ni mogel zagotoviti nobenega pojasnila ali argumentov, zakaj in kako bi ukinitev ukrepov zoper uvoz EMD iz Južne Afrike izboljšala razmere.
EMD accounts for only 10-15 % of the total cost of production of batteries.
EMD predstavljajo le 10–15 % celotnih stroškov proizvodnje baterij.
This value decreased compared to the original investigation.
Ta vrednost se je v primerjavi s prvotno preiskavo zmanjšala.
In addition, following imposition of measures, the average sales price of EMD in the Union actually decreased.
Poleg tega se je po uvedbi ukrepov povprečna prodajna cena EMD v Uniji dejansko znižala.
In reality, no evidence was provided that maintaining the measures in force would have a non-negligible influence on the costs of production of battery producers.
Predložen ni bil noben dokaz, da bi imela ohranitev veljavnih ukrepov omembe vreden vpliv na stroške proizvajalcev pri proizvodnji baterij.
In the absence of such evidence, the Commission concludes that maintaining the measures would not unduly affect the EMD users.
Ker ni takih dokazov Komisija ugotavlja, da ohranitev ukrepov ne bi pretirano vplivala na uporabnike EMD.
Following disclosure, the same user disagreed with the Commission’s assessment of the situation and commented that following imposition of measures one source of good quality EMD disappeared, prices for EMD increased and even if EMD accounts for only 10-15 % of the production costs this has a significant impact on the already small profitability of Union battery producers.
Po razkritju se isti uporabnik ni strinjal z oceno Komisije glede stanja ter je pripomnil, da je bil po uvedbi ukrepov en vir kakovostnih EMD izgubljen, cene EMD so se povečale, in čeprav EMD predstavlja le 10–15 % proizvodnih stroškov, ima to pomemben vpliv na že tako majhno dobičkonosnost proizvajalcev baterij v Uniji.
Notwithstanding the claim, the evidence in the file shows that the user’s choice not to make use of Delta’s EMD was not linked to the imposition of anti-dumping duties and that the threat to the user’s profitability and jobs is not an increase in EMD price but is in fact the downward pressure on price exerted by their main customers (multinational retailers with significant purchasing power) and by Chinese battery producers.
Ne glede na trditve, dokazi v spisu kažejo, da odločitev uporabnika, da ne bo uporabil Deltinih EMD, ni bila povezana z uvedbo protidampinških ukrepov ter da grožnje za dobičkonosnost in delovna mesta uporabnika ne predstavlja višja cena EDM, pač pa pritisk na nižanje cen, ki ga izvajajo njegove glavne stranke (multinacionalni prodajalci na drobno z veliko kupno močjo) in kitajski proizvajalci baterij.
The same user of EMD commented that the measures should not be maintained, as the investigation found no dumping to the Union during the RIP and that there was no risk of recurrence of dumping due to the small market share possible for Delta if all its spare capacity was directed to the Union.
Isti uporabnik EMD je pojasnil, da se ukrepi ne bi smeli ohraniti, saj v preiskavi ni bil ugotovljen damping na trg Unije v OPP, in da ni nobenega tveganja za ponovitev dampinga zaradi majhnega tržnega deleža, ki bi ga lahko imela Delta, če bi vse svoje neizkoriščene zmogljivosti usmerila v Unijo.
This argument was rejected as Delta’s potential market share identified would clearly be significant and these exports to the Union would likely be made at dumped prices.
Ta argument je bil zavrnjen, saj bi bil ugotovljeni tržni delež Delte vsekakor velik, njen izvoz v Unijo pa bi verjetno potekal po dampinških cenah.
The complainants mentioned in the request for an expiry review that if demand for electric cars increases in the Union in the future, there will be an upstream increase in demand for EMD which is said to be the raw material most frequently used in the production of lithium manganese oxide (LMO) which in turns serves as cathode material for rechargeable lithium ion batteries (LIB) used in many models of electric vehicles.
Pritožniki so v zahtevku za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov navedli, da če bi se v prihodnje povpraševanje po električnih avtomobilih v Uniji povečalo, bi se povečalo tudi povpraševanje po EMD, ki naj bi bili surovina, ki se najpogosteje uporablja pri proizvodnji litij-manganovega oksida (LMO), ki služi kot katodni material pri litij-ionskih baterijah (LIB) z možnostjo ponovnega polnjenja, ki se uporabljajo v mnogih modelih električnih vozil.
They claim that if injury from dumped South African imports reoccurs, the Union EMD industry may not be around to service this potential future demand in new technologies.
Trdili so, da v primeru, če bi se ponovno pojavila škoda zaradi dampinškega uvoza iz Južne Afrike, industrija EMD v Uniji morda ne bo mogla zadostiti temu potencialnemu povpraševanju po novih tehnologijah.
The investigation did not find conclusive evidence in support or against the claim that any future development in the electric car sector would significantly impact the EMD industry and the demand for EMD.
Preiskava ni odkrila prepričljivih dokazov v podporo ali proti zahtevku, da bo vsakršen prihodnji razvoj na področju električnih avtomobilov znatno vplival na industrijo EMD in povpraševanje po njih.
However, it is a fact that the Union industry is testing the feasibility of manufacturing LMO using EMD, is able to obtain the know-how and the equipment to do so in the future and is participating in a number of Union funded projects related to the research and development of lithium-ion batteries.
Vendar pa je dejstvo, da industrija Unije testira izvedljivosti proizvodnje LMO z uporabo EMD, lahko v prihodnosti pridobi znanje in opremo za to ter sodeluje pri številnih projektih, ki jih financira Unija, povezanih z raziskavami in razvojem litij-ionskih baterij.
Following disclosure, this issue was briefly mentioned by some interested parties, but again no conclusive evidence was provided on the possible impact of any future development in the electric car sector in the Union and/or in other markets on the product concerned.
Po razkritju so nekatere zainteresirane strani na kratko obravnavale to vprašanje, vendar spet ni bilo prepričljivih dokazov o možnem vplivu prihodnjega razvoja na področju električnih avtomobilov v Uniji in/ali na drugih trgih zadevnega izdelka.
Given the evidence above, there are no compelling reasons against the maintenance of the current anti-dumping measures.
Glede na navedene dokaze ni tehtnih razlogov, ki bi nasprotovali ohranitvi sedanjih protidampinških ukrepov.
Therefore under Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of certain electrolytic manganese dioxides originating in South Africa should be maintained for an additional period of five years,
Zato je treba v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe protidampinške ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz nekaterih elektrolitskih manganovih dioksidov s poreklom iz Južne Afrike, ohraniti še za obdobje petih let –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is imposed on imports of electrolytic manganese dioxides (i.e. manganese dioxides produced through an electrolytic process) not heat-treated after the electrolytic process, currently falling within CN code ex28201000 (TARIC code 2820100010) and originating in the Republic of South Africa.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz elektrolitskih manganovih dioksidov (tj. manganovih dioksidov, proizvedenih z elektrolizo), ki po elektrolizi niso toplotno obdelani, se uvrščajo pod oznako KN ex28201000 (oznaka TARIC 2820100010) in so po poreklu iz Republike Južne Afrike.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Union-frontier price, before duty, for the products manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne veljavne protidampinške dajatve za neto ceno franko meja Unije pred plačilom dajatve za izdelke, ki jih proizvajajo spodaj navedene družbe, je:
Council Regulation (EC) No 221/2008 of 10 March 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain manganese dioxides originating in South Africa (OJ L 69, 13.3.2008, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 221/2008 z dne 10. marca 2008 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih manganovih dioksidov s poreklom iz Južne Afrike (UL L 69, 13.3.2008, str. 1).
OJ C 180, 21.6.2012, p. 15.
UL C 180, 21.6.2012, str. 15.
OJ C 72, 12.3.2013, p. 8.
UL C 72, 12.3.2013, str. 8.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 192/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 192/2014
approving the active substance 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011
o odobritvi aktivne snovi 1,4-dimetilnaftalen v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet ter o spremembi Priloge k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC the Netherlands received on 25 June 2009 an application from DormFresh Ltd for the inclusion of the active substance 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS je Nizozemska 25. junija 2009 prejela zahtevek podjetja DormFresh Ltd za vključitev aktivne snovi 1,4-dimetilnaftalen v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Decision 2010/244/EC confirmed that the dossier was ‘complete’ in the sense that it could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annexes II and III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
S Sklepom 2010/244/ES je bilo potrjeno, da je dokumentacija „popolna“ v smislu načelnega izpolnjevanja zahtev po podatkih in informacijah iz prilog II in III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The designated rapporteur Member State submitted a draft assessment report on 21 March 2012.
Država članica poročevalka je 21. marca 2012 predložila osnutek poročila o oceni.
The Authority presented to the Commission its conclusion on the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene [4] on 16 May 2013.
Agencija je 16. maja 2013 Komisiji predložila sklep o oceni tveganja, ki ga predstavljajo pesticidi z aktivno snovjo 1,4-dimetilnaftalen [4].
The draft assessment report and the conclusion of the Authority were reviewed by the Member States and the Commission within the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and finalised on 13 December 2013 in the format of the Commission review report for 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene.
Države članice in Komisija so osnutek poročila o oceni in sklep Agencije pregledale v Stalnem odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali ter končno različico pripravile 13. decembra 2013 v obliki poročila Komisije o pregledu 1,4-dimetilnaftalena.
It has appeared from the various examinations made that plant protection products containing 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene may be expected to satisfy, in general, the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) and Article 5(3) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in particular with regard to the uses which were examined and detailed in the Commission review report.
Različne preiskave so pokazale, da se za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo 1,4-dimetilnaftalen, lahko pričakuje, da na splošno izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) ter člena 5(3) Direktive 91/414/EGS, zlasti v zvezi z vrstami uporabe, ki so bile proučene in podrobno navedene v poročilu Komisije o pregledu.
It is therefore appropriate to approve 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene.
Zato je primerno, da se 1,4-dimetilnaftalen odobri.
Member States should be allowed a period of six months after approval to review authorisations of plant protection products containing 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba po odobritvi omogočiti šestmesečno obdobje, da pregledajo registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo 1,4-dimetilnaftalen.
The active substance 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene, as specified in Annex I, is approved subject to the conditions laid down in that Annex.
Aktivna snov 1,4-dimetilnaftalen, kot je opredeljena v Prilogi I, je odobrena v skladu s pogoji iz navedene priloge.
Member States shall in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, where necessary, amend or withdraw existing authorisations for plant protection products containing 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene as an active substance by 31 December 2014.
Države članice v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1107/2009 do 31. decembra 2014 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo veljavne registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo 1,4-dimetilnaftalen kot aktivno snov.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, for each authorised plant protection product containing 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene as either the only active substance or as one of several active substances, all of which were listed in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 by 30 June 2014 at the latest, Member States shall re-evaluate the product in accordance with the uniform principles, as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, on the basis of a dossier satisfying the requirements of Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC and taking into account the column on specific provisions of Annex I to this Regulation.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 države članice najpozneje do 30. junija 2014 znova ocenijo vsako registrirano fitofarmacevtsko sredstvo, ki vsebuje 1,4-dimetilnaftalen kot edino aktivno snov ali kot eno od aktivnih snovi, vključenih v Prilogo k Izvedbeni uredbi (EU) št. 540/2011, po enotnih načelih iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 na podlagi dokumentacije, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS, in ob upoštevanju stolpca o posebnih določbah iz Priloge I k tej uredbi.
in the case of a product containing 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene as the only active substance, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 December 2015 at the latest; or
če sredstvo vsebuje 1,4-dimetilnaftalen kot edino aktivno snov, najpozneje do 31. decembra 2015 po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo registracijo; ali
in the case of a product containing 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene as one of several active substances, where necessary, amend or withdraw the authorisation by 31 December 2015 or by the date fixed for such an amendment or withdrawal in the respective act or acts which added the relevant substance or substances to Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC or approved that substance or those substances, whichever is the latest.
če sredstvo vsebuje 1,4-dimetilnaftalen kot eno od več aktivnih snovi, registracijo po potrebi spremenijo ali prekličejo najpozneje do 31. decembra 2015 ali do datuma, določenega za tako spremembo ali preklic v ustreznih aktih, s katerimi so bile zadevne snovi dodane v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS oziroma s katerimi so bile zadevne snovi odobrene, pri čemer se upošteva poznejši datum.
Commission Decision 2010/244/EU of 26 April 2010 recognising in principle the completeness of the dossier submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene and cyflumetofen in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ L 107, 29.4.2010, p. 22).
Sklep Komisije 2010/244/EU z dne 26. aprila 2010 o načelnem priznavanju popolnosti dokumentacij, predloženih v podroben pregled zaradi možne vključitve 1,4-dimetilnaftalena in ciflumetofena v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS (UL L 107, 29.4.2010, str. 22).
CAS No 571-58-4
št. CAS 571-58-4
CIPAC No 822
št. CIPAC 822
For the implementation of the uniform principles as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, as finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on 13 December 2013 shall be taken into account.
Za izvajanje enotnih načel iz člena 29(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 se upoštevajo ugotovitve iz poročila o pregledu 1,4-dimetilnaftalena ter zlasti dodatka I in II h končni različici poročila, ki jo je Stalni odbor za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali pripravil 13. decembra 2013.
the protection of operators and of workers at re-entry and during inspection of the warehouse;
zaščito izvajalcev in delavcev pri ponovnem vstopu in pregledu skladišča;
the risk to aquatic organisms and fish-eating mammals the active substance is discharged from warehouses into air and surface water without further treatment.
tveganje za vodne organizme in sesalce, ki jedo ribe, aktivna snov iz skladišč prehaja v zrak in odteka v površinsko vodo brez nadaljnje obdelave.
The applicant shall submit confirmatory information as regards the residue definition for the active substance.
Vlagatelj predloži potrditvene informacije o opredelitvi ostanka za aktivno snov.