natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to recital 20 and onwards of the Solar Panels Provisional Regulation, the product covered by that investigation is crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules or panels and cells and wafers of the type used in crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules or panels.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je Komisija pridobila iz izpolnjenih vprašalnikov vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, so bile cene kitajskega izvoza v glavne namembne kraje za izvoz industrije Unije dejansko zelo nizke, v OP pa so se še dodatno znižale v primerjavi z letom 2011.
Therefore, thin-film photovoltaic modules are not subject to that investigation and their consumption is not covered.
To kaže, da je zmanjšan izvoz industrije Unije predvsem posledica vedno nižjih cen kitajskega izvoza tudi na trgih tretjih držav, kot je potrdila preiskava.
See recital 107 and onwards of the Solar Panels Provisional Regulation.
Najvišjo raven je dosegla leta 2011, ko se je v primerjavi z letom 2009 povečala za 105 %.
The findings of the Solar Panels Provisional Regulation contained in recitals 107 to 109 were confirmed in recitals 245 to 265 of the Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 of 2 December 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China (OJ L 325, 5.12.2013, p.
Vendar industrija Unije ni mogla v celoti izkoristiti tega povečanja potrošnje.
1).
V zvezi s proizvodno zmogljivostjo industrije Unije, kot je navedeno v preglednici 4, je njeno povečanje jasno sledilo gibanju povečanja potrošnje Unije do konca leta 2011.
See for example: http://www.lesoir.be/421477/article/actualite/fil-info/fil-info-economie/2014-02-07/agc-confirme-l-arret-du-verre-solaire-roux from 7 February 2014.; http://www.pv-magazine.com/news/details/beitrag/centrosolar-glas-must-declare-insolvency_100013055/#axzz2tDr5dhxV from 16 October 2013.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je glavni vzrok za 12,5-odstotno povečanje proizvodne zmogljivosti med letom 2011 in OP vstop ene družbe na trg solarnega stekla.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 470/2014 of 13 May 2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of solar glass originating in the People’s Republic of China (See page 1 of this Official Journal).
Proizvodna zmogljivost vseh drugih družb na trgu se je v istem obdobju nekoliko zmanjšala.
ANNEX I
Zato je trend gibanja proizvodne zmogljivosti Unije na splošno sledil trendu potrošnje Unije.
Name
Po razkritju sta dve strani trdili, da sta škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Unije, poleg gibanja potrošnje zadevnega izdelka povzročila tudi zmanjšanje potrošnje solarnih modulov in izguba, ki jo je ta industrija utrpela konec leta 2011/na začetku leta 2012.
ANNEX II
Učinek finančnih težav proizvajalcev solarnih plošč na trgu solarnega stekla se je domnevno začel izražati konec leta 2011 in leta 2012, saj je bil potreben časovni zamik med obema dogodkoma.
The valid commercial invoice referred to in Article 1(3) must be issued showing the following:
Potrošnja solarnih modulov se je v istem obdobju, tj. 2009–2012, stalno povečevala in je kljub zmanjšanju leta 2012 ohranila za 221 % višjo raven kot leta 2009 in za 44 % višjo kot leta 2010 [21].
The name and function of the official of the entity issuing the commercial invoice.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so povpraševanje po modulih v Uniji sicer sprva ustvarile sheme finančne pomoči, večinoma tarife za dovajanje toka, vendar ni bilo mogoče skleniti, da so znižanja teh tarif (ob koncu leta 2011 in začetku leta 2012) prekinila vzročno zvezo med subvencioniranim uvozom in škodo [22].
The following declaration:
Prvič, Komisija ugotavlja, da je kartel prenehal delovati najpozneje leta 2007.
‘I, the undersigned, certify that the (area in m2) of solar glass sold for export to the European Union covered by this invoice was manufactured by (company name and address) (TARIC additional code) in the People’s Republic of China.
Zato učinki kartela v preteklosti niso vplivali na industrijo v obravnavanem obdobju.
I declare that the information provided in this invoice is complete and correct.’
Kot je navedeno v oddelku E.2.3, je bila raven potrošnje leta 2010 podobna kot leta 2012.
Date and signature of the official of the entity issuing the commercial invoice.
Prav tako je industrija Unije leta 2010 povečevala zmogljivost v pričakovanju močnega povečanja povpraševanja, kar je negativno vplivalo na njen dobiček v zadevnem letu.
loan repayments by Government
Glej uvodno izjavo 107 in vse nadaljnje uvodne izjave začasne uredbe o sončnih ploščah.
grant programmes:
Ugotovitve v uvodnih izjavah 107 do 109 začasne uredbe o sončnih ploščah so bile potrjene v uvodnih izjavah 245 do 265 Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1238/2013 z dne 2. decembra 2013 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani (UL L 325, 5.12.2013, str.
The GOC also alleged that significant changes had taken place between the solar panels investigation and this one, in particular the lifting of the floor on interest rates by the PBOC in July 2013.
1).
This allegation was rejected as the conclusions from the solar panels investigation refer to that investigation period, just as this investigation refers to its own investigation period.
http://www.china.org.cn/english/kuaixun/76340.htm.
Other Grant programmes
Avic Sanxin Sol-Glass Co.
The Commission disclosed these findings to interested parties, and received comments from the GOC stating that under the Notice of Transition [17] all benefits under this scheme would cease in 2012.
Ltd in Avic (Hainan) Special Glass Material Co., Ltd
The GOC stated that therefore should countervailing duties be imposed, no duties could be imposed as regards the benefit received under this scheme by one sampled company during the IP.
http://www.fsolar.de/cms/fileadmin/user_upload/Bilder/PVSEC_2013/Presse_Information_EU_PVSEC_2013_Paris_ENG.pdf.
This subsidy is specific as defined in Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation since it is limited to the enterprises receiving the certification of High and New Tech Enterprises and complying with all the requirements of the 2008 administrative measures.
http://www.adcommission.gov.au/cases/documents/141-AttachmentstoPreliminaryReportonExistenceofCVSubsisides-GovofthePeoplesRepublicofChina-N.pdf.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 473/2014
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 473/2014
amending Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards supplementing Annex III thereto with new indicative maps
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1315/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede dopolnitve Priloge III z novimi informativnimi zemljevidi
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU [1], and in particular Article 49(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1315/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. decembra 2013 o smernicah Unije za razvoj vseevropskega prometnega omrežja in razveljavitvi Sklepa št. 661/2010/EU [1] ter zlasti člena 49(6) Uredbe,
Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 provides for the possibility to add indicative maps of the trans-European transport network extended to specific neighbouring countries based on high-level agreements on transport infrastructure networks between the Union and the neighbouring countries concerned.
Uredba (EU) št. 1315/2013 določa možnost dodajanja informativnih zemljevidov vseevropskega prometnega omrežja, razširjenega na določene sosednje države na podlagi sporazumov na visoki ravni o prometnih infrastrukturnih omrežjih med Unijo in zadevnimi državami članicami.
A high-level agreement between the Union, Russia and Belarus has been reached in the framework of the Northern Dimension Partnership on Transport and Logistics (NDPTL) on 21 November 2012.
Sporazum na visoki ravni med Unijo, Rusijo in Belorusijo je bil dosežen v okviru partnerstva severne dimenzije za promet in logistiko (PSDPL) 21. novembra 2012.
A high level agreement between the Union and Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan has been reached in the framework of the Eastern Partnership on 9 October 2013.
Sporazum na visoki ravni med Unijo in Belorusijo, Ukrajino, Moldavijo, Gruzijo, Armenijo in Azerbajdžanom je bil dosežen v okviru vzhodnega partnerstva 9. oktobra 2013.
Adding indicative maps of the transport networks, connected to the networks defined in Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013, would allow to better target the Union cooperation with the third countries in question.
Dodajanje okvirnih informativnih zemljevidov prometnih omrežij, povezanih z omrežji, ki so opredeljena v Uredbi (EU) št. 1315/2013, bi omogočalo boljše ciljno sodelovanje Unije z zadevnimi tretjimi državami.
The high-level agreements with the neighbouring countries concern the lines of the railway and road networks, as well as the ports, airports and rail-road terminals.
Sporazumi na visoki ravni s sosednjimi državami zadevajo proge železniškega in cestnega omrežja, kot tudi pristanišča, letališča in železniško-cestne terminale.
The status of the railways and roads in terms of completion of the infrastructure was not part of the agreements.
Status železnic in cest v smislu dopolnitve infrastrukture ni bil del teh sporazumov.
Therefore, the railways and roads were presented in the context of the high-level agreements as ‘completed’,
Zato so bile železnice in ceste v okviru sporazumov na visoki ravni predstavljene kot „dopolnjene“ –
Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Delegated Regulation.
Priloga III k Uredbi (EU) št. 1315/2013 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej delegirani uredbi.
OJ L 348, 20.12.2013, p.
UL L 348, 20.12.2013, str.
Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 is amended as follows:
Priloga III k Uredbi (EU) št. 1315/2013 se spremeni:
The map under the heading ‘Map Finder Chart for Neighbouring Countries’ is replaced by the following:
zemljevid pod naslovom „Prikaz zemljevidov za sosednje države“ se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The following maps 15.1 to 17.2 are added:
dodajo se naslednji zemljevidi od 15.1 do 17.2:
Comprehensive Network: Railways, ports, rail-road terminals and airports
Celovito omrežje: železnice, pristanišča, železniško-cestni terminali in letališča
Eastern Partnership Transport Network: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia
Prometno omrežje vzhodnega partnerstva: Armenija, Azerbajdžan, Gruzija
Comprehensive
Celovito
Core
Jedrno
RRT
Železniško-cestni terminali
Comprehensive Network: Roads, ports, rail-road terminals and airports
Celovito omrež je: ceste, pristanišča, železniško-cestni terminali in letališča
Road / Completed
Cesta / Dokončano
Road / To be upgrade
Cesta / Potrebna nadgradnja
Road / Planned
Cesta / Načrtovano
Eastern Partnership Transport Network: Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine
Prometno omrežje vzhodnega partnerstva: Belorusija, Moldavija, Ukrajina
Road / To be upgraded
Cesta / Potrebna nadgradnja
Northern Dimension Partnership on Transport and Logistics: Belarus, Russian Federation
Partnerstvo severne dimenzije za promet in logistiko: Belorusija, Ruska federacija
Commission Regulation (EU) No 474/2014
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 474/2014
amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (‘REACH’) as regards 1,4-dichlorobenzene
o spremembi Priloge XVII k Uredbi (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH) glede 1,4-diklorobenzena
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC [1], and in particular Article 68(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH) ter o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije in o spremembi Direktive 1999/45/ES ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 793/93 in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1488/94 ter Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS in direktiv Komisije 91/155/EGS, 93/67/EGS, 93/105/ES in 2000/21/ES [1], ter zlasti člena 68(1) Uredbe,
A risk assessment on 1,4 dichlorobenzene (hereinafter ‘DCB’) was carried out by the French authorities in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 [2] on the evaluation and control of the risks of the existing substances appearing in the European Inventory of Existing Commercial Substances.
Francoski organi so izvedli oceno tveganja za 1,4-diklorobenzen v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 793/93 [2] o oceni in nadzoru tveganja, ki ga predstavljajo obstoječe snovi, navedene v Evropskem seznamu obstoječih komercialnih snovi.
The final report was published in 2004 on the European Chemicals Bureau website (EC, 2004) [3].
Končno poročilo je bilo objavljeno leta 2004 na spletni strani Evropskega urada za kemikalije (ES, 2004) [3].
In February 2008, the Commission communication [4] on the results of the risk evaluation and the risk reduction strategies for DCB was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Februarja 2008 je bilo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavljeno sporočilo Komisije [4] o rezultatih ocenjevanja tveganja in strategijah za zmanjševanje tveganja za 1,4-diklorobenzen.
That communication recommended that, in order to limit the risk for consumers, marketing and use restrictions in Council Directive 76/769/EEC [5] should be considered for the use of DCB in air fresheners, moth repellents and toilet blocks.
V navedenem sporočilu je bilo priporočeno, da bi za omejitev tveganja za potrošnike bilo treba upoštevati omejitve trženja in uporabe iz Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS [5] za uporabo 1,4-diklorobenzena v osvežilcih zraka, repelentih za molje in vložkih za straniščno školjko.
Restrictions on the use of DCB as a moth repellent, as recommended by that communication in 2008, are already covered by Commission Decision 2007/565/EC [6] (product type 19 — Repellents and attractants) and therefore restriction under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 is not necessary for that use.
Omejitve uporabe 1,4-diklorobenzena kot repelenta za molje, kot je priporočeno v navedenem sporočilu iz leta 2008, so že zajete v Odločbi Komisije 2007/565/ES [6] (19. vrsta izdelkov – repelenti in sredstva za privabljanje (atraktanti)), zato omejitev v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 za navedeno uporabo ni potrebna.
In November 2011, in accordance with Article 69(1) of that Regulation, the Commission requested the European Chemicals Agency (hereinafter ‘the Agency’) to prepare a restriction dossier for DCB conforming to the requirements of Annex XV to that Regulation (hereinafter ‘the Annex XV dossier’).
Komisija je novembra 2011 v skladu s členom 69(1) navedene uredbe Evropsko agencijo za kemikalije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) zaprosila za pripravo dokumentacije o omejitvah za 1,4-diklorobenzen v skladu z zahtevami iz Priloge XV k navedeni uredbi (v nadaljnjem besedilu: dokumentacija iz Priloge XV).
In its request the Commission specifically asked the Agency to address the exposure of consumers at home and in public toilets, including the exposure of professionals attending or cleaning such toilets, taking into account the most recent and relevant information in scientific literature and the decline of the use of DCB in Europe.
V svoji zahtevi je Komisija Agencijo izrecno pozvala, naj obravnava izpostavljenost potrošnikov doma in v javnih straniščih, vključno z izpostavljenostjo poklicnih uporabnikov, ki nadzorujejo ali čistijo taka stranišča, ob upoštevanju najnovejših in ustreznih informacij v znanstveni literaturi ter zmanjšanja uporabe 1,4-diklorobenzena v Evropi.
The report [7] commissioned by the Commission on the socioeconomic impacts of a restriction of DCB was also to be considered in this assessment.
Poročilo [7] o socialno-ekonomskih učinkih omejitve 1,4-diklorobenzena, ki ga je naročila Komisija, naj bi se prav tako obravnavalo v tej oceni.
DCB is listed in part 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [8] as a carcinogen in hazard category 2, as well as for its eye irritation properties and its high toxicity to aquatic organisms, with long lasting effects.
1,4-diklorobenzen je naveden na seznamu v delu 3 Priloge VI k Uredbi (ES) št. 1272/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8] kot rakotvorna snov kategorije 2 ter zaradi draženja oči in visoke toksičnosti za vodne organizme z dolgotrajnimi učinki.
It is estimated that approximately 800 tonnes per year of DCB are used in the Union, for the manufacturing of air fresheners and toilet deodoriser products, of which 10 % is destined for domestic uses and the rest for professional uses (essentially as deodorisers in public toilets).
Ocenjuje se, da se v Uniji na leto uporabi okrog 800 ton 1,4-diklorobenzena za proizvodnjo osvežilcev zraka in dezodorantov za stranišča, pri čemer je 10 % namenjeno domači uporabi, preostanek pa poklicni uporabi (predvsem kot dezodoranti v javnih straniščih).
On 19 April 2012, the Agency submitted to its Committee for Risk Assessment (hereinafter ‘RAC’) and to its Committee for Socio-Economic Analysis (hereinafter ‘SEAC’) the Annex XV dossier.
Agencija je 19. aprila 2012 svojemu odboru za oceno tveganja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: RAC) in odboru za socialno-ekonomsko analizo (v nadaljnjem besedilu: SEAC) predložila dokumentacijo iz Priloge XV.
In that dossier [9], it was demonstrated that the placing on the market and use of DCB-based air fresheners and toilet blocks should be restricted for both domestic and professional uses as risks associated with them are not adequately controlled and the benefits arising from the restriction outweigh the costs.
V navedeni dokumentaciji [9] je bilo prikazano, da bi dajanje na trg in uporabo osvežilcev zraka in vložkov za straniščne školjke na osnovi 1,4-diklorobenzena bilo treba omejiti za domačo in poklicno uporabo, saj z njimi povezana tveganja niso ustrezno nadzorovana, koristi, ki izhajajo iz omejitve, pa odtehtajo stroške.
The dossier further demonstrated that action on a Union-wide basis is necessary.
V dokumentaciji je bilo nadalje navedeno, da so potrebni ukrepi na ravni Unije.
On 8 March 2013, RAC adopted by consensus its opinion on the restriction proposed in the Annex XV dossier.
RAC je 8. marca 2013 soglasno sprejel mnenje o omejitvi, predlagani v dokumentaciji iz Priloge XV.
According to the RAC opinion, the restriction is the most appropriate Union-wide measure to address the identified risks posed by DCB used as an air freshener or deodoriser in toilets, homes, offices or other indoor public areas, both in terms of effectiveness and practicability.
Po mnenju RAC je omejitev najprimernejši ukrep na ravni Unije za obravnavanje ugotovljenih tveganj 1,4-diklorobenzena, kadar se uporablja kot osvežilec zraka ali dezodorant v straniščih, domovih, pisarnah ali drugih zaprtih javnih prostorih, tako v smislu učinkovitosti kot izvedljivosti.
However, RAC proposed to modify the restriction for enforceability reasons, specifying a concentration limit of 1 % by weight for DCB in such products, thereby avoiding products containing DCB as an impurity being unduly affected.
Vendar je RAC zaradi izvršljivosti predlagal spremembo omejitve in določil mejno koncentracijo 1 mas. % za 1,4-diklorobenzen v navedenih proizvodih, s čimer bi se izognili neupravičenim posledicam za proizvode, ki vsebujejo 1,4-diklorobenzen kot nečistoto.
That concentration corresponds to the limit value which triggers classification of a mixture as a category 2 carcinogen under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Navedena koncentracija ustreza mejni vrednosti, ki vodi do razvrstitve snovi med rakotvorne snovi kategorije 2 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1272/2008.
As indicated in the background document to the RAC opinion, reliable analytical methods to determine contents of DCB are available on the Union market.
Kot je navedeno v obrazložitvenem dokumentu k mnenju RAC, so na trgu Unije na voljo zanesljive analitske metode za določitev vsebnosti 1,4-diklorobenzena.
In its assessment, RAC considered that carcinogenicity (mitogen, threshold carcinogen) is the end-point of greatest relevance to the human health.
RAC je v svoji oceni menil, da je vidik rakotvornost (mitogen, prag rakotvornosti) najbolj bistvenega pomena za zdravje ljudi.
Based on data on inhalation exposure to DCB vapours, RAC proposed to reduce the identified risk to consumers when they use air fresheners and toilet deodorisers, containing DCB, continuously at home.
Na podlagi podatkov o inhalacijski izpostavljenosti hlapom 1,4-diklorobenzena je RAC predlagal zmanjšanje ugotovljenega tveganja za potrošnike, ko doma neprekinjeno uporabljajo osvežilce zraka in dezodorante za stranišča, ki vsebujejo 1,4-diklorobenzen.
That scenario was considered to represent reasonable worst-case conditions of exposure.
Za navedeni scenarij se je štelo, da predstavlja najbolj neugodne pogoje izpostavljenosti.
In addition, the RAC opinion stated that exposure of professional toilet attendants and cleaners needs to be reduced as risk has been identified where toilets are poorly ventilated.
Poleg tega je RAC v svojem mnenju navedel, da je treba zmanjšati izpostavljenost poklicnih nadzornikov in čistilcev v straniščih, saj je bilo ugotovljeno tveganje v slabo prezračenih straniščih.
In analysing the scope of the restriction RAC considered the exposure of consumers to air fresheners and toilet deodorisers in households and in public toilets as well as of professionals who work in public toilets, including toilet attendants and cleaners, but also other groups such as maintenance personnel.
Pri analizi področja uporabe omejitve je RAC obravnaval izpostavljenost potrošnikov osvežilcem zraka in dezodorantom za stranišča v gospodinjstvih in javnih straniščih ter poklicnih uporabnikov, ki delajo v javnih straniščih, vključno z nadzorniki in čistilci v straniščih ter drugimi skupinami, kot je vzdrževalno osebje.
Consumers and professionals who visit and work in indoor areas (other than toilets) where air fresheners containing DCB are used were also considered.
Obravnavani so bili tudi potrošniki in poklicni uporabniki, ki obiskujejo zaprte prostore (ki niso stranišča) ali delajo v zaprtih prostorih, kjer se uporabljajo osvežilci zraka, ki vsebujejo 1,4-diklorobenzen.
Other professional or industrial uses were not considered.
Druge poklicne ali industrijske uporabe niso bile obravnavane.
On 5 June 2013, SEAC adopted by consensus its opinion on the restriction proposed in the Annex XV dossier.
SEAC je 5. junija 2013 soglasno sprejel mnenje o omejitvi, predlagani v dokumentaciji iz Priloge XV.
According to the SEAC opinion, the restriction, as modified by RAC and SEAC, is the most appropriate Union-wide measure to address the identified risks in terms of the proportionality of its socioeconomic benefits to its socioeconomic costs.
Po mnenju SEAC je omejitev, kakor sta jo spremenila RAC in SEAC, najprimernejši ukrep na ravni Unije za obravnavanje ugotovljenih tveganj v smislu sorazmernosti socialno-ekonomskih koristi in socialno-ekonomskih stroškov.