natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Entry 25 of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 specifies a maximum concentration of 0,3 % in relation to the use of triclosan as a preservative in cosmetic products.
Vnos 25 v Prilogi V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1223/2009 določa najvišjo koncentracijo 0,3 % za uporabo triklosana kot konzervansa v kozmetičnih izdelkih.
The Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP), subsequently replaced by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) pursuant to Commission Decision 2008/721/EC [2], adopted an opinion on the safety of triclosan for human health in January 2009 [3], followed by an addendum of March 2011 [4].
Znanstveni odbor za potrošniške proizvode (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ZOPP), ki ga je pozneje v skladu s Sklepom Komisije 2008/721/ES [2] nadomestil Znanstveni odbor za varstvo potrošnikov (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ZOVP), je januarja 2009 [3] sprejel mnenje o varnosti triklosana za zdravje ljudi, ki je bilo dopolnjeno marca 2011 [4].
The SCCP considered that the continued use of triclosan as a preservative at the current maximum concentration limit of 0,3 % in all cosmetic products is not safe for the consumer because of the magnitude of the aggregate exposure, and the SCCS confirmed this position.
ZOPP je menil, da nadaljnja uporaba triklosana kot konzervansa pri sedanji najvišji koncentraciji 0,3 % v vseh kozmetičnih izdelkih ni varna za potrošnika zaradi obsega celotne izpostavljenosti, ZOVP pa je to stališče potrdil.
However, the SCCP considered that its use at a maximum concentration of 0,3 % in toothpastes, hand soaps, body soaps/shower gels and deodorants, face powders and blemish concealers is safe.
Vendar je ZOPP menil, da je njegova uporaba pri najvišji koncentraciji 0,3 % v zobnih kremah, milih za roke, milih/gelih za tuširanje in dezodorantih, pudrih in korektorjih za obraz varna.
In addition, the SCCS considered that other uses of triclosan in nail products where the intended use is to clean the fingernails and toenails before the application of artificial nail systems at a maximum concentration of 0,3 % and in mouthwashes at a maximum concentration of 0,2 % are safe for the consumer.
Poleg tega je ZOVP menil, da so druge uporabe triklosana v izdelkih za nohte, katerih predvidena uporaba je čiščenje nohtov na rokah in nogah pred uporabo pripravkov za umetne nohte, pri najvišji koncentraciji 0,3 % in v ustnih vodah pri najvišji koncentraciji 0,2 % varne za potrošnika.
In light of the SCCS opinions mentioned above, the Commission considers that maintaining the restriction on the use of triclosan at its current level would raise a potential risk to human health.
Komisija na podlagi navedenih mnenj ZOVP meni, da bi ohranitev omejitev uporabe triklosana na sedanji ravni pomenila možno tveganje za zdravje ljudi.
The additional restrictions suggested by the SCCP and the SCCS should therefore be implemented in Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009.
Zato bi bilo treba v Prilogo V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1223/2009 vnesti dodatne omejitve, ki sta jih predlagala ZOPP in ZOVP.
Entry 12 of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 specifies a maximum concentration of 0,4 % for single ester and 0,8 % for mixtures of esters in relation to the use of parabens as preservatives in cosmetic products, under the denomination 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and its salts and esters.
Vnos 12 v Prilogi V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1223/2009 določa najvišjo koncentracijo 0,4 % za posamezni ester in 0,8 % za mešanico estrov glede uporabe parabenov z imenom 4-hidroksibenzojska kislina, njene soli in estri kot konzervansov v kozmetičnih izdelkih.
The SCCS adopted an opinion on parabens in December 2010 [5], followed by a clarification of October 2011 [6] in response to a unilateral decision by Denmark to ban propylparaben and butylparaben, their isoforms and their salts in cosmetic products for children under three years of age based on their potential endocrine activity, taken in accordance with Article 12 of Council Directive 76/768/EEC [7].
ZOVP je decembra 2010 sprejel mnenje o parabenih [5], ki mu je oktobra 2011 [6] sledilo pojasnilo v odgovor na enostransko odločitev Danske, sprejeto v skladu s členom 12 Direktive Sveta 76/768/EGS [7], o prepovedi propilparabena in butilparabena, njunih izooblik in njunih soli v kozmetičnih izdelkih za otroke, mlajše od treh let, zaradi njihovega možnega endokrinega delovanja.
The SCCS confirmed that methylparaben and ethylparaben are safe at the maximum authorised concentrations.
ZOVP je potrdil, da je uporaba metilparabena in etilparabena varna pri najvišjih dovoljenih koncentracijah.
In addition, the SCCS noted that limited or no information was submitted by industry for the safety evaluation of isopropylparaben, isobutylparaben, phenylparaben, benzylparaben and pentylparaben.
Poleg tega je ZOVP ugotovil, da industrija ni predložila podatkov za oceno varnosti izopropilparabena, izobutilparabena, fenilparabena, benzilparabena in pentilparabena ali pa so bili ti podatki omejeni.
As a result, for these compounds, the human risk cannot be evaluated.
Posledično za te spojine ni mogoče oceniti tveganja za ljudi.
Therefore, those substances should no longer be listed in Annex V and, given that they might be used as antimicrobial agents, they should be listed in Annex II to make clear that they are prohibited in cosmetic products.
Zato navedene snovi ne bi smele biti več navedene v Prilogi V; glede na to, da se lahko uporabljajo kot protimikrobne snovi, pa bi morale biti navedene v Prilogi II, da se pojasni njihova prepoved v kozmetičnih izdelkih.
The conclusions the SCCS drew in the same opinions on propylparaben and butylparaben were challenged by a study carried out by the French authorities [8], therefore a further risk assessment of those two substances was adopted by the SCCS in May 2013 [9].
Ugotovitve ZOVP iz navedenih mnenj o propilparabenu in butilparabenu so s študijo poskušali ovreči francoski organi [8], zato je ZOVP maja 2013 sprejel dodatno oceno tveganja za navedeni snovi [9].
Measures on propylparaben and butylparaben are under preparation, as a second step in the risk management of parabens.
Ukrepi za propilparaben in butilparaben so v pripravi kot drugi korak pri obvladovanju tveganja, ki ga predstavljajo parabeni.
No concerns were raised on the safety of 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid and its salts (calcium paraben, sodium paraben, potassium paraben).
Glede varnosti 4-hidroksibenzojske kisline in njenih soli (kalcijev paraben, natrijev paraben, kalijev paraben) ni bilo izraženih nobenih pomislekov.
The relevant annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Zadevni prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 1223/2009 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The application of the above-mentioned restrictions should be deferred to allow the industry to make the necessary adjustments to product formulations.
Uporabo zgoraj navedenih omejitev bi bilo treba odložiti in tako industriji omogočiti, da pripravi potrebne prilagoditve formulacij izdelka.
In particular, undertakings should be granted six months to place on the market compliant products, and 15 months to stop making available on the market non-compliant products after the entry into force of this Regulation, in order to allow existing stocks to be exhausted.
Zlasti bi se moralo podjetjem po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe odobriti obdobje šestih mesecev za dajanje na trg izdelkov, ki izpolnjujejo zahteve, in obdobje petnajstih mesecev, ko na trgu ne smejo več biti dostopni izdelki, ki ne izpolnjujejo zahtev, da se omogoči poraba obstoječih zalog.
Annexes II and V to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Prilogi II in V k Uredbi (ES) št. 1223/2009 se spremenita v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
From 30 October 2014 only cosmetic products which comply with this Regulation shall be placed on the Union market.
Od 30. oktobra 2014 se na trg Unije dajejo le kozmetični izdelki, ki so skladni s to uredbo.
From 30 July 2015 only cosmetic products which comply with this Regulation shall be made available on the Union market.
Od 30. julija 2015 so na trgu Unije dostopni le kozmetični izdelki, ki so skladni s to uredbo.
Commission Decision 2008/721/EC of 5 August 2008 setting up an advisory structure of Scientific Committees and experts in the field of consumer safety, public health and the environment and repealing Decision 2004/210/EC (OJ L 241, 10.9.2008, p. 21).
Sklep Komisije 2008/721/ES z dne 5. avgusta 2008 o vzpostavitvi svetovalne strukture znanstvenih odborov in strokovnjakov na področju varstva potrošnikov, javnega zdravja in okolja ter razveljavitvi Sklepa 2004/210/ES EC (UL L 241, 10.9.2008, str. 21).
SCCP/1192/08, http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_o_166.pdf
ZOPP/1192/08, http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_o_166.pdf.
SCCS/1414/11, http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_054.pdf
ZOVP/1414/11, http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_054.pdf.
SCCS/1348/10 Revision 22 March 2011.
ZOVP/1348/10 revizija z dne 22. marca 2011.
The annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 are amended as follows:
Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 1223/2009 se spremenita:
in Annex II the following entries 1374 to 1378 are added:
V Prilogo II se dodajo naslednji vnosi 1374 do 1378:
Reference Number
Referenčna številka
Substance Identification
Opredelitev snovi
Chemical Name/INN
Kemijsko ime/INN
Sodium salt or Salts of Isopropylparaben
Natrijeva sol ali soli izopropilparabena
Sodium salt or Salts of Isobutylparaben
Natrijeva sol ali soli izobutilparabena
ydroxybenzoic acid and its salts and esters, other than the esters of isopropyl, isobutyl, phenyl, benzyl and pentyl
idroksibenzojska kislina, njene soli in estri, razen estrov izopropila, izobutila, fenila, benzila in pentila
0,4 % (as acid) for single ester,
0,4 % (kot kislina) za posamezni ester,
0,8 % (as acid) for mixtures of esters’
0,8 % (kot kislina) za mešanico estrov“
entry 25 is replaced by the following:
vnos 25 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
hloro-2- (2,4- dichlorophenoxy) phenol
loro-2-(2,4-diklorofenoksi)fenol
Toothpastes
Zobne kreme
Hand soaps
Mila za roke
Body soaps/Shower gels
Mila/geli za tuširanje
Deodorants (non-spray)
Nerazpršilni dezodoranti
Face powders and blemish concealers
Pudri in korektorji za obraz
Nail products for cleaning the fingernails and toenails before the application of artificial nail systems
Izdelki za čiščenje nohtov na rokah in nogah pred uporabo pripravkov za umetne nohte
Mouthwashes
Ustne vode
SCCS/1446/11.
ZOVP/1446/11.
SCCS/1514/13.
ZOVP/1514/13.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 359/2014
amending Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 as regards the list of countries referred to in Article 9 thereof
o spremembi Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 136/2004 glede seznama držav iz člena 9 navedene uredbe
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [1], and in particular Article 19(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [1], in zlasti člena 19(1) Direktive,
Directive 97/78/EC lays down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Union from third countries.
Direktiva Sveta 97/78/ES določa načela, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Unijo iz tretjih držav.
Article 19(1) of that Directive provides that the Commission is to draw up a list of plant products which will be subjected to border veterinary checks and a list of the third countries which may be authorised to export those plant products to the Union.
Člen 19(1) navedene direktive določa, da mora Komisija sestaviti seznam rastlinskih proizvodov, ki bodo veterinarsko pregledani na mejnih točkah, in seznam tretjih držav, katerim se lahko dovoli izvoz navedenih rastlinskih proizvodov v Unijo.
Accordingly Annex IV to Commission Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 [2] lists hay and straw as plant products subject to border veterinary checks while Part I of Annex V to that Regulation lists the countries from which Member States are authorised to import hay and straw.
Tako sta v Prilogi IV k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 136/2004 [2] seno in slama navedena kot rastlinska proizvoda, pri katerih se opravijo veterinarski pregledi na mejnih točkah, v delu I Priloge V k navedeni uredbi pa so navedene države, iz katerih je državam članicam dovoljeno uvažati seno in slamo.
For the sake of clarity, the country ISO codes should be added in Annex V.
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba v Prilogo V dodati ISO oznake držav.
Serbia has recently requested the authorisation to export hay and straw to the Union.
Srbija je nedavno zaprosila za dovoljenje za izvoz sena in slame v Unijo.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 [3] lists Serbia as a country from which consignments of fresh meat of bovine, ovine and caprine animals and of domestic solipeds may be imported into the Union.
Z Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 206/2010 [3] je bila Srbija uvrščena na seznam držav, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz svežega govejega, ovčjega in kozjega mesa ter svežega mesa enoprstih kopitarjev v Unijo.
Although live ungulates from Serbia are not allowed to be introduced into the Union, hay and straw can be allowed for introduction, as the animal health situation in Serbia does not present a risk of spreading infectious or contagious animal diseases through these plant products, which might have been in contact with live animals.
Čeprav ni dovoljeno vnašati živih kopitarjev iz Srbije v Unijo, se lahko dovoli vnos sena in slame, saj zdravstveno stanje živali v Srbiji ne predstavlja tveganja za širjenje kužnih ali nalezljivih živalskih bolezni prek teh rastlinskih proizvodov, ki bi lahko bili v stiku z živimi živalmi.
Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 136/2004 bi bilo zato bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
Ukrepi iz te uredbe so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali –
Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 is replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga V k Uredbi (ES) št. 136/2004 se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
THE LIST OF COUNTRIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 9
SEZNAM DRŽAV IZ ČLENA 9
South Africa (excluding that part of the foot-and-mouth disease control area situated in the veterinary region Northern and Eastern Transvaal, in the district of Ingwavuma of the veterinary region of Natal and in the border area with Botswana east of longitude 28°)
Južna Afrika (razen tistega dela območja nadzora slinavke in parkljevke, ki leži v veterinarski regiji severnega in vzhodnega Transvaala, v okrožju Ingwavuma veterinarske regije Natal ter na območju meje z Bocvano vzhodno od zemljepisne dolžine 28°)
As referred to in Article 135 of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part (OJ L 278, 18.10.2013, p. 16).’
Kot je navedeno v členu 135 Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropskima skupnostma in njunimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Srbijo na drugi strani (UL L 278, 18.10.2013, str. 16).“
Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 was adopted before the entry into force of the 2003 Treaty of Accession.
Uredba (ES) št. 136/2004 je bila sprejeta pred začetkom veljavnosti Pogodbe o pristopu iz leta 2003.
Part II of Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 contains a list of acceding States which was relevant until 30 April 2004.
Del II Priloge V k Uredbi (ES) št. 136/2004 vsebuje seznam držav pristopnic, ki je bil ustrezen do 30. aprila 2004.
It is therefore no longer necessary to maintain neither Part II of Annex V nor the separation of Annex V in two parts.
Zato ni več potrebno niti ohranjati del II Priloge V niti ločevati Prilogo V v dva dela.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 360/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 360/2014
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ferro-silicon originating in the People's Republic of China and Russia, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz fero-silicija s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Rusije po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular 11(2), (5) and (6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(2), (5) in (6) Uredbe,
The Council, following an anti-dumping investigation (‘the original investigation’), imposed, by means of Regulation (EC) No 172/2008 [2], a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ferro-silicon (‘FeSi’) currently falling within CN codes 72022100, 72022910 and 72022990 originating in the People's Republic of China (‘the PRC’), Egypt, Kazakhstan, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Russia (‘the definitive anti-dumping measures’).
Svet je po protidampinški preiskavi („prvotna preiskava“) z Uredbo (ES) št. 172/2008 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz fero-silicija, ki se trenutno uvršča pod oznake KN 72022100, 72022910 in 72022990, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“), Egipta, Kazahstana, Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije in Rusije („dokončni protidampinški ukrepi“).
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty established at 31,2 % on imports from the PRC, with the exception of Erdos Xijin Kuangye Co.
Ukrepi so bili uvedeni v obliki dajatve ad valorem v višini 31,2 % na uvoz iz LRK, z izjemo družb Erdos Xijin Kuangye Co.
(15,6 %) and Lanzhou Good Land Ferroalloy Factory Co., (29,0 %), at 18,0 % on imports from Egypt, with the exception of The Egyptian Ferroalloys Co.
(15,6 %) in Lanzhou Good Land Ferroalloy Factory Co.
(15,4 %), at 33,9 % on imports from Kazakhstan, at 5,4 % on imports from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and at 22,7 % on imports from Russia, with the exception of Bratsk Ferroalloy Plant (17,8 %).
(29,0 %), v višini 18,0 % na uvoz iz Egipta, z izjemo družbe The Egyptian Ferroalloys Co.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1297/2009 [3] repealed the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 172/2008 on imports of FeSi originating in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
(15,4 %), v višini 33,9 % na uvoz iz Kazahstana, v višini 5,4 % na uvoz iz Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije ter v višini 22,7 % na uvoz iz Rusije, z izjemo družbe Bratsk Ferroalloy Plant (17,8 %).
On 30 November 2009, the European Commission (‘the Commission’) received a request for a partial interim review (‘the interim review’) pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, lodged by an exporting producer from Russia, Joint Stock Company Chelyabinsk Electrometallurgical Integrated Plant and its related company Joint Stock Company Kuznetsk Ferroalloy Works (hereinafter jointly referred to as ‘the Russian group’).
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1297/2009 [3] je razveljavila protidampinško dajatev, uvedeno z Uredbo (ES) št. 172/2008 na uvoz fero-silicija s poreklom iz Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije.
The Council, by Regulation (EU) No 60/2012 [4] terminated the partial interim review on the grounds of insufficient evidence of a lasting nature of changed circumstances.
Evropska komisija („Komisija“) je 30. novembra 2009 prejela zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled („vmesni pregled“) v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, ki ga je vložil proizvajalec izvoznik iz Rusije, in sicer družba Joint Stock Company Chelyabinsk Electrometallurgical Integrated Plant in njena povezana družba Joint Stock Company Kuznetsk Ferroalloy Works (v nadaljnjem besedilu skupaj „ruska skupina“).
In particular, the Russian group did not demonstrate that its pricing behaviour was of a lasting nature.
Svet je z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 60/2012 [4] zaključil delni vmesni pregled na podlagi nezadostnih dokazov glede trajnosti spremenjenih okoliščin.
Therefore, the dumping margin established for the Russian group in the original investigation was not amended.
Ruska skupina predvsem ni dokazala, da je bilo gibanje cen trajne narave.
The undertaking offer made by the Russian group was rejected on the same grounds.
Zato stopnja dampinga, določena za rusko skupino v prvotni preiskavi, ni bila spremenjena.
Request for an expiry review
Iz istih razlogov je bila zavrnjena ponudba v obliki zavez, ki jo je predložila ruska skupina.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [5] of the definitive anti-dumping measures in force, the Commission received on 28 November 2012 a request for the initiation of an expiry review of those measures pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa
The request was lodged by Euroalliages (‘the applicant’) on behalf of producers representing more than 25 % of the total Union production of FeSi.
Komisija je 28. novembra 2012 po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [5] veljavnih dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka teh ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request concerned the following two countries: the PRC and Russia.
Zahtevek je vložila organizacija Euroalliages („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo več kot 25 % celotne proizvodnje fero-silicija v Uniji.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Union industry.
Zahtevek se je nanašal na naslednji državi: LRK in Rusijo.
Initiation of an expiry review
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi se zaradi izteka ukrepov damping in škoda za industrijo Unije verjetno nadaljevala ali ponovila.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission announced, on 28 February 2013, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [6] (‘the notice of initiation’), the initiation of an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa
Investigation
Komisija je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom ugotovila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, in je 28. februarja 2013 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [6] („obvestilo o začetku“) napovedala pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
Review investigation period and period considered
Preiskava
The investigation of a continuation or recurrence of dumping covered the period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2012 (‘the review investigation period’ or ‘RIP’).
Obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom in obravnavano obdobje
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2012 (‘the period concerned’).
Preiskava v zvezi z nadaljevanjem ali ponovitvijo dampinga je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2012 do 31. decembra 2012 („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OPP“).
Parties concerned by the investigation
Proučitev trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajemala obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2012 („obravnavano obdobje“).