natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Union concluded the agreements on readmission with the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China by Council Decision 2004/424/EC [1], with the Republic of Albania by Council Decision 2005/809/EC [2],with the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka by Council Decision 2005/372/EC [3], with the Russian Federation by Council Decision 2007/341/EC [4], with the Republic of Montenegro by Council Decision 2007/818/EC [5], with the Republic of Serbia by Council Decision 2007/819/EC [6], with Bosnia and Herzegovina by Council Decision 2007/820/EC [7], with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia by Council Decision 2007/817/EC [8], with the Republic of Moldova by Council Decision 2007/826/EC [9], with the Islamic Republic of Pakistan by Council Decision 2010/649/EU [10] and with Georgia by Council Decision 2011/118/EU [11].
Unija je sklenila sporazume o ponovnem sprejemu z Macaom, posebno upravno regijo Ljudske republike Kitajske, s Sklepom Sveta 2004/424/ES [1], z Republiko Albanijo s Sklepom Sveta 2005/809/ES [2], z Demokratično socialistično republiko Šrilanko s Sklepom Sveta 2005/372/ES [3], z Rusko federacijo s Sklepom Sveta 2007/341/ES [4], z Republiko Črno goro s Sklepom Sveta 2007/818/ES [5], z Republiko Srbijo s Sklepom Sveta 2007/819/ES [6], z Bosno in Hercegovino s Sklepom Sveta 2007/820/ES [7], z Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo s Sklepom Sveta 2007/817/ES [8], z Republiko Moldavijo s Sklepom Sveta 2007/826/ES [9], z Islamsko republiko Pakistan s Sklepom Sveta 2010/649/EU [10] ter z Gruzijo s Sklepom Sveta 2011/118/EU [11].
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Ireland did not take part in the adoption of the Decisions concluding the respective agreements on readmission, and was hence not bound by them or subject to their application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, Irska ni sodelovala pri sprejetju sklepov o sklenitvi sporazumov o ponovnem sprejemu, zato ti zanjo niso zavezujoči in se v njej ne uporabljajo.
In accordance with Article 4 of that Protocol, Ireland notified the Commission by letter of 11 December 2013 of its wish to accept and be bound by those agreements.
V skladu s členom 4 navedenega protokola je Irska Komisijo z dopisom z dne 11. decembra 2013 obvestila o svoji odločitvi, da sprejme navedene sporazume in da jo ti zavezujejo.
The Commission should notify the third countries concerned in writing that Ireland has chosen to be bound by the respective agreements,
Komisija bi morala zadevne tretje države pisno obvestiti o odločitvi Irske, da jo zadevni sporazumi zavezujejo –
The following agreements on readmission concluded by the Union shall apply to Ireland in accordance with this Decision:
V skladu s tem sklepom se za Irsko uporabljajo naslednji sporazumi o ponovnem sprejemu, ki jih je sklenila Unija:
the agreement with the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, concluded by Decision 2004/424/EC;
sporazum z Macaom, posebno upravno regijo Ljudske republike Kitajske, sklenjen s Sklepom 2004/424/ES;
the agreement with the Republic of Albania, concluded by Decision 2005/809/EC;
sporazum z Republiko Albanijo, sklenjen s Sklepom 2005/809/ES;
the agreement with the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, concluded by Decision 2005/372/EC;
sporazum z Demokratično socialistično republiko Šrilanko, sklenjen s Sklepom 2005/372/ES;
the agreement with the Russian Federation, concluded by Decision 2007/341/EC;
sporazum z Rusko federacijo, sklenjen s Sklepom 2007/341/ES;
the agreement with the Republic of Montenegro, concluded by Decision 2007/818/EC;
sporazum z Republiko Črno goro, sklenjen s Sklepom 2007/818/ES;
the agreement with the Republic of Serbia, concluded by Decision 2007/819/EC;
sporazum z Republiko Srbijo, sklenjen s Sklepom 2007/819/ES;
the agreement with Bosnia and Herzegovina, concluded by Decision 2007/820/EC;
sporazum z Bosno in Hercegovino, sklenjen s Sklepom 2007/820/ES;
the agreement with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, concluded by Decision 2007/817/EC;
sporazum z Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, sklenjen s Sklepom 2007/817/ES;
the agreement with the Republic of Moldova, concluded by Decision 2007/826/EC;
sporazum z Republiko Moldavijo, sklenjen s Sklepom 2007/826/ES;
the agreement with the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, concluded by Decision 2010/649/EU;
sporazum z Islamsko republiko Pakistan, sklenjen s Sklepom 2010/649/EU;
the agreement with Georgia, concluded by Decision 2011/118/EU.
sporazum z Gruzijo, sklenjen s Sklepom 2011/118/EU.
The Commission shall notify each of the third countries which are parties to the agreements referred to in Article 1 that the respective agreement concluded with that third country applies to Ireland.
Komisija bo vse tretje države, ki so pogodbenice sporazumov iz člena 1, obvestila, da se zadevni sporazumi, sklenjeni s temi tretjimi državami, uporabljajo za Irsko.
Each respective agreement shall apply to Ireland from the first day of the second month following the receipt of the notification by that third country.
Vsak od sporazumov se uporablja za Irsko od prvega dne drugega meseca po tem, ko zadevna tretja država prejme obvestilo.
Done at Brussels, 22 May 2014.
V Bruslju, 22. maja 2014
Council Decision 2004/424/EC of 21 April 2004 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (OJ L 143 30.4.2004, p. 97).
Sklep Sveta 2004/424/ES z dne 21. aprila 2004 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Macaom, posebno upravno regijo Ljudske republike Kitajske, o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki bivajo brez dovoljenja (UL L 143, 30.4.2004, str. 97).
Council Decision 2005/809/EC of 7 November 2005 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Albania on the readmission of persons residing without authorization (OJ L 304 23.11.2005, p. 14).
Sklep Sveta 2005/809/ES z dne 7. novembra 2005 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Albanijo o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja (UL L 304, 23.11.2005, str. 14).
Council Decision 2005/372/EC of 3 March 2005 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (OJ L 124 17.5.2005, p. 41).
Sklep Sveta 2005/372/ES z dne 3. marca 2005 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Demokratično socialistično republiko Šrilanko o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki bivajo brez dovoljenja (UL L 124, 17.5.2005, str. 41).
Council Decision 2007/341/EC of 19 April 2007 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation on readmission (OJ L 129 17.5.2007, p. 38).
Sklep Sveta 2007/341/ES z dne 19. aprila 2007 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Rusko federacijo o ponovnem sprejemu (UL L 129, 17.5.2007, str. 38).
Council Decision 2007/818/EC of 8 November 2007 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Montenegro on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (OJ L 334 19.12.2007, p. 25).
Sklep Sveta 2007/818/ES z dne 8. novembra 2007 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Črno goro o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja (UL L 334, 19.12.2007, str. 25).
Council Decision 2007/819/EC of 8 November 2007 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Serbia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (OJ L 334 19.12.2007, p. 45).
Sklep Sveta 2007/819/ES z dne 8. novembra 2007 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Srbijo o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja (UL L 334, 19.12.2007, str. 45).
Council Decision 2007/820/EC of 8 November 2007 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and Bosnia and Herzegovina on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (OJ L 334 19.12.2007, p. 65).
Sklep Sveta 2007/820/ES z dne 8. novembra 2007 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo ter Bosno in Hercegovino o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja (UL L 334, 19.12.2007, str. 65).
Council Decision 2007/817/EC of 8 November 2007 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (OJ L 334 19.12.2007, p. 1).
Sklep Sveta 2007/817/ES z dne 8. novembra 2007 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja (UL L 334, 19.12.2007, str. 1).
Council Decision 2007/826/EC of 22 November 2007 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (OJ L 334 19.12.2007, p. 148).
Sklep Sveta 2007/826/ES z dne 22. novembra 2007 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko Moldavijo o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja (UL L 334, 19.12.2007, str. 148).
Council Decision 2010/649/EU of 7 October 2010 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (OJ L 287 4.11.2010, p. 50).
Sklep Sveta 2010/649/EU z dne 7. oktobra 2010 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Pakistan o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja (UL L 287, 4.11.2010, str. 50).
Council Decision 2011/118/EU of 18 January 2011 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation (OJ L 52 25.2.2011, p. 45).
Sklep Sveta 2011/118/EU z dne 18. januarja 2011 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Gruzijo o ponovnem sprejemu oseb, ki prebivajo brez dovoljenja (UL L 52, 25.2.2011, str. 45).
exempting certain services in the postal sector in Hungary from the application of Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC
o izvzetju nekaterih storitev v poštnem sektorju na Madžarskem iz uporabe Direktive 2014/25/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o javnem naročanju naročnikov, ki opravljajo dejavnosti v vodnem, energetskem in prometnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev, ter o razveljavitvi Direktive 2004/17/ES
(notified under document C(2014) 3372)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 3372)
Having regard to Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and repealing Directive 2004/17/EC [1], and in particular to Article 34 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2014/25/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. februarja 2014 o javnem naročanju naročnikov, ki opravljajo dejavnosti v vodnem, energetskem in prometnem sektorju ter sektorju poštnih storitev, ter o razveljavitvi Direktive 2004/17/ES [1], in zlasti člena 34 Direktive,
On the 21 November 2013 Magyar Posta Zrt.
Magyar Posta Zrt.
(hereinafter referred to as Magyar Posta) transmitted to the Commission, by e-mail, a request pursuant Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
(v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba Magyar Posta) je 21. novembra 2013 Komisiji po elektronski pošti poslala zahtevek v skladu s členom 30(5) Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2].
The Commission requested additional information from Hungary by e-mails of 6 February 2014, and from the applicant by e-mails of 28 January 2014, 20 February 2014, 11 March 2014, 13 March 2014 and 25 March 2014.
Zadevne storitve so v zahtevku opisane tako:
Additional information was received from Hungary by e-mail of 26 February 2014, and from the applicant by e-mails of 19 February 2014, 4 March 2014, 18 March 2014, 24 March 2014 and 27 March2014 respectively.
storitve, povezane z nenaslovljenimi oglaševalskimi publikacijami;
The request concerns certain services provided by Magyar Posta on the territory of Hungary.
storitve, povezane z distribucijo naročniških časopisov in periodičnih publikacij.
The services concerned are described as follows in the request:
PRAVNI OKVIR
services related to unaddressed advertising publications;
Člen 34 Direktive 2014/25/EU, ki je nadomestila Direktivo 2004/17/ES, določa, da se navedena direktiva ne uporablja za javna naročila, katerih namen je omogočiti opravljanje dejavnosti, za katere velja Direktiva 2014/25/EU, če je v državi članici, v kateri se dejavnost opravlja, dejavnost neposredno izpostavljena konkurenci na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen.
services related to distribution of subscribed newspapers and periodical publications.
Neposredna izpostavljenost konkurenci se oceni na podlagi objektivnih meril ob upoštevanju posebnih značilnosti zadevnega sektorja.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
Dostop se šteje za neomejenega, če država članica pri odprtju zadevnega sektorja ali njegovega dela izvaja in uporablja ustrezno zakonodajo Unije.
Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU, which replaced Directive 2004/17/EC, provides that contracts intended to enable the performance of one of the activities to which Directive 2014/25/EU applies shall not be subject to that Directive if, in the Member State in which it is carried out, the activity is directly exposed to competition in markets to which access is not restricted.
Ta zakonodaja je navedena v Prilogi III k Direktivi 2014/25/EU, ki se za poštni sektor sklicuje na Direktivo 97/67/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3].
Direct exposure to competition is assessed on the basis of objective criteria, taking account of the specific characteristics of the sector concerned.
Madžarska izvaja in uporablja Direktivo 97/67/ES.
Access is deemed to be unrestricted if the Member State has implemented and applied the relevant Union legislation opening a given sector or a part of it.
Nobena od storitev, na katere se nanaša ta zahtevek, ob njegovi predložitvi ni bila rezervirana.
That legislation is listed in Annex III to Directive 2014/25/EU, which, for the postal sector, refers to Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
Ker je Madžarska dosegla stopnjo odprtosti trga, ki je določena v zakonodaji, navedeni v Prilogi III k Direktivi 2014/25/EU, bi bilo treba dostop do trga v skladu s členom 34(3) navedene direktive obravnavati kot neomejen.
Hungary has implemented and applied Directive 97/67/EC.
Neposredna izpostavljenost konkurenci na določenem trgu se oceni na podlagi različnih meril, od katerih ni nobeno odločilno samo po sebi.
None of the services concerned by the present request were reserved at the time of the request.
Eno merilo, ki bi ga bilo treba upoštevati v zvezi s trgi, na katere se nanaša zahtevek družbe Magyar Posta, je tržni delež glavnih akterjev na zadevnem trgu.
As Hungary has reached the level of market opening provided for under the legislation listed in Annex III to Directive 2014/25/EU, access to the market should be deemed not to be restricted in accordance with Article 34(3) of that Directive.
Drugo merilo bi lahko bila stopnja koncentracije na navedenih trgih.
Direct exposure to competition in a particular market is evaluated on the basis of various criteria, none of which are, per se, decisive.
Ker se pogoji za različne dejavnosti, na katere se nanaša zahtevek, med seboj razlikujejo, bi bilo treba pri proučevanju konkurenčnih razmer upoštevati različne razmere na različnih trgih.
In respect of the markets to which the request of Magyar Posta relates, the market share of the main players on a given market constitutes one criterion which should be taken into account.
Ta sklep ne posega v uporabo pravil o konkurenci.
Another criterion could be the degree of concentration in those markets.
Zlasti merila in metodologija, ki se uporabljajo za oceno neposredne izpostavljenosti konkurenci v skladu s členom 35 Direktive 2014/25/EU, niso nujno enaka tistim, ki se uporabljajo za oceno v skladu s členom 101 ali 102 Pogodbe ali Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 [4].
As the conditions vary for the different activities that are concerned by the request, the examination of the competitive situation should take into account the different situations in different markets.
OCENA
This Decision is without prejudice to the application of the rules on competition.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba, da je cilj te ocene ugotoviti, ali so storitve, na katere se nanaša zahtevek, izpostavljene takšni stopnji konkurence (na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen v smislu člena 34 Direktive 2014/25/EU), ki bo tudi ob odsotnosti discipline, dosežene s podrobnimi pravili javnega naročanja iz Direktive 2014/25/EU, zagotovila pregledno in nediskriminacijsko izvajanje javnih naročil za opravljanje zadevnih dejavnosti na podlagi meril, ki naročnikom omogočajo ugotoviti, katera rešitev je ekonomsko najugodnejša.
In particular, the criteria and the methodology used to assess direct exposure to competition under Article 35 of Directive 2014/25/EU are not necessarily identical to those used to perform an assessment under Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty or Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [4].
V zvezi s tem bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je za zadevne trge na splošno značilna prisotnost več izvajalcev storitev.
ASSESSMENT
Vendar sta od navedenih izvajalcev glede na razpoložljive informacije samo družba Magyar Posta in njena hčerinska družba Posta Kézbesítő Kft [5] (v nadaljnjem besedilu: družba POKÉZ) naročnika v smislu Direktive 2014/25/EU.
It should be kept in mind that the aim of this assessment is to establish whether the services concerned by the request are exposed to such a level of competition (in markets to which access is not restricted within the meaning of Article 34 of Directive 2014/25/EU) that this will ensure that, also in the absence of the discipline brought about by the detailed procurement rules set out in Directive 2014/25/EU, procurement for the pursuit of the activities concerned will be carried out in a transparent, non-discriminatory manner based on criteria allowing purchasers to identify the solution which overall is the economically most advantageous one.
Za javna naročila, ki jih oddajo konkurenti družbe Magyar Posta in njene hčerinske družbe, da bi izvedli dejavnosti, na katere se nanaša ta sklep, ne veljajo določbe Direktive 2014/25/EU.
In this context, it should be recalled that the markets concerned are generally characterised by the presence of several service providers.
Zato se analiza trga v tem sklepu in brez poseganja v konkurenčno pravo ne bo osredotočala na splošno stopnjo konkurence na zadevnem trgu, temveč bo ocenila, ali so dejavnosti naročnikov izpostavljene konkurenčnemu pritisku na trgih, do katerih dostop ni omejen.
However, according to the available information, out of those providers, only Magyar Posta and its subsidiary Posta Kézbesítő Kft [5] (hereinafter referred to as POKÉZ) are contracting entities within the meaning of Directive 2014/25/EU.
Komisija je v svoji praksi [6] menila, da so trgi za storitve dostave pošte in kakršni koli njihovi segmenti po obsegu nacionalni.
The procurement of the competitors of Magyar Posta and its subsidiary, for the purpose of carrying out the activities concerned by this decision, is not subject to the provisions of Directive 2014/25/EU.
Ta razdelitev v glavnem temelji na dejstvu, da se takšne storitve zagotavljajo na nacionalni ravni.
Consequently, for the purposes of this Decision and without prejudice to competition law, the market analysis will not focus on the general degree of competition in a given market, but will assess whether or not the activities of the contracting entities are exposed to competitive pressure in markets to which access is not restricted.
Mnenje prijaviteljice [7] je v skladu z navedeno prakso Komisije.
In its practice [6], the Commission has taken the view that the markets for mail delivery services and any segments thereof are national in scope.
Tudi Madžarska meni [8], da je geografski trg za dejavnosti, ki so zajete v zahtevku, nacionalen.
This segmentation is mainly based on the fact that such services are provided at national level.
Glede na to, da ni znakov, ki bi kazali na širše ali manjše geografsko območje trga, se brez poseganja v konkurenčno pravo in da bi se ocenilo, ali so pogoji iz člena 34(1) Direktive 2014/25/EU izpolnjeni, šteje, da je upoštevni geografski trg madžarsko ozemlje.
The applicant's position [7] is in line with this Commission practice.
Storitve, povezane z distribucijo nenaslovljenih oglaševalskih publikacij, ki jo zagotavljajo poštni operaterji
Hungary also took the view [8] that the geographical market for the activities subject to the request is national.
Komisija je v prejšnjih sklepih menila, da je trg za storitve dostave pošte mogoče razdeliti na trge naslovljene pošte in trge nenaslovljene pošte [9].
Given that there are no indications of a wider or smaller geographical scope of the market, for the purposes of evaluating whether the conditions laid down in Article 34(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU are fulfilled, and without prejudice to competition law, the relevant geographic market is considered to be the territory of Hungary.
Za nenaslovljeno oglaševanje po pošti je značilno, da nima določenega namembnega naslova, ki bi določal posameznega končnega naslovnika.
Services related to distribution of unaddressed advertising publications provided by postal operators
Gre za neželeno oglaševanje po pošti, ki izpolnjuje nekatera merila, kot so: enotna teža, oblika, vsebina in razporeditev za distribucijo skupini prejemnikov.
The Commission has held in previous decisions that the market for the mail delivery services can be segmented in addressed mail markets and unaddressed mail markets [9].
Storitve družbe Magyar Posta, povezane z nenaslovljenimi oglaševalskimi publikacijami, zajemajo naslednje kategorije: storitve za domače nenaslovljene oglaševalske publikacije (tj. letake, prospekte itd.), domačo nenaslovljeno volilno literaturo in distribucijo brezplačnega tiska.
Unaddressed advertising mail is characterised by the absence of particular destination address identifying the final addressee individually.
Družba Magyar Posta meni, da distribucija brezplačnega tiska spada na ta proizvodni trg, ker se distribucija brezplačnega tiska naroča in distribuira na enak način kot druge vrste nenaslovljenega oglaševanja.
It is unsolicited advertising mail, which fulfils certain criteria such as: uniform weight, format, contents and layout for distribution to a group of recipients.
Prijaviteljica opredeljuje upoštevni proizvodni trg kot trg storitev za nenaslovljene oglaševalske publikacije (tj. tiskane nenaslovljene oglaševalske publikacije, dostavljene v pisemski nabiralnik).
Magyar Posta's services related to unaddressed advertising publication cover the following categories: domestic unaddressed advertising publication services (i.e. flyers, leaflets, etc.), domestic unaddressed election literature and distribution of free press.
Madžarska je bila pozvana [10], naj izrazi svoje mnenje o predlagani opredelitvi trga za trg nenaslovljenega oglaševanja ob ustreznem upoštevanju sedanjih pravnih in dejanskih razmer na Madžarskem.
Magyar Posta considers that distribution of free press belongs to this product market given the fact that distribution of free press is contracted and distributed in the same way as the other types of unaddressed advertising.
Madžarska je potrdila [11] prijaviteljičino opredelitev upoštevnega proizvodnega trga.