natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 2
V tem sklepu se uporabljajo opredelitve pojmov iz člena 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97.
The party set out in table 1 is hereby exempted from the extension by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the definitive anti-dumping duty on bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 [8] to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People's Republic of China.The exemption shall take effect in relation to that party as from the date provided for in the column headed ‘Date of effect’.
Člen 2
The exemption shall apply only to the party specifically referred to in table 1 with its name and address.
Stranka, navedena v preglednici 1, je izvzeta iz razširitve dokončne protidampinške dajatve iz Uredbe (ES) št. 71/97 o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 2474/93 [8] na kolesa s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz nekaterih delov za kolesa iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.Izvzetje za to stranko začne veljati z datumom iz stolpca z naslovom „Začetek veljavnosti“.
The exempted party shall notify the Commission forthwith, of any change to these, providing all relevant information, in particular on any modification in the party's activities linked to assembly operations with regard to the conditions of exemption.
Izvzetje se uporablja le za stranko, izrecno navedeno v preglednici 1, z navedenim imenom in naslovom.
Exempted party
Izvzeta stranka nemudoma obvesti Komisijo o kakršni koli spremembi imena oziroma naslova in zagotovi vse potrebne informacije, zlasti o kakršni koli spremembi v svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z montažnimi dejavnostmi v zvezi s pogoji za izvzetje.
Exemption pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 88/97
Izvzeta stranka
Date of effect
Izvzetje v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 88/97
Article 3
Člen 7
The parties listed in table 2 are under examination pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97.
Člen 3
The suspension of payment of the extended anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 shall be effective as from the dates of receipt of these parties' requests.
Stranke iz preglednice 2 so v postopku pregleda v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97.
These dates are provided for in the column headed ‘Date of effect’.
Opustitev plačila razširjene protidampinške dajatve v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97 začne veljati z datumom prejema zahtevkov strank.
This suspension shall apply only to the parties specifically referred to in table 2 with their names and addresses.
Ti datumi so navedeni v stolpcu z naslovom „Začetek veljavnosti“.
The party under examination shall notify the Commission forthwith, of any change to these, providing all relevant information, in particular on any modification in the party's activities linked to assembly operations with regard to the conditions of suspension.
Ta opustitev se uporablja le za stranke, izrecno navedene v preglednici 2, z navedenimi imeni in naslovi.
Parties under examination
Stranka v pregledu nemudoma obvesti Komisijo o kakršni koli spremembi imena oziroma naslova in zagotovi vse potrebne informacije, zlasti o kakršni koli spremembi v svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z montažnimi dejavnostmi v zvezi s pogoji za izvzetje.
Suspension pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 88/97
Stranke v pregledu
Schlesische Straße 27, 10997 Berlin
Opustitev v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 88/97
Article 5
Schlesische Straße 27, 10997 Berlin
Rajdowa 3a, Konotopa, 05-850 Ożarów Mazowiecki
Člen 5
The request for exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty submitted by the party set out in table 3 is hereby rejected pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97.
Člen 4
The suspension of payment of the extended anti-dumping duty is hereby lifted for this party pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97, as from the date provided for in the column headed ‘Date of effect’.
Zahtevek za izvzetje iz razširjene protidampinške dajatve, ki ga je vložila stranka iz preglednice 3, se zavrne v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97.
Party for which the suspension shall be lifted
Opustitev plačila razširjene protidampinške dajatve se za to stranko ukine v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97, in sicer od datuma iz stolpca z naslovom „Začetek veljavnosti“.
The exemption of the party set out in table 4 from the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty is hereby revoked pursuant to Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97, as from the date provided for in the column headed ‘Date of effect’.
Stranka, za katero se opustitev ukine
Party for which the exemption shall be revoked
Izvzetje stranke, navedene v preglednici 4, iz plačila razširjene protidampinške dajatve se prekliče v skladu s členom 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 88/97, in sicer od datuma iz stolpca z naslovom „Začetek veljavnosti“.
1 day after publication of the present Decision
Stranka, za katero se izvzetje prekliče
Article 6
Dan po objavi tega sklepa
Updated references to the exempted parties listed in table 5 are provided for in the column headed ‘New reference’.
Člen 6
The corresponding TARIC additional codes previously attributed to these exempted parties as provided for in the column headed ‘TARIC additional code’ remain the same.
Posodobljeni sklici na izvzete stranke v preglednici 5 so navedeni v stolpcu z naslovom „Novi sklici“.
Exempted parties for which the reference shall be updated
Ustrezne dodatne oznake TARIC, ki so bile prej dodeljene tem izvzetim strankam, ostajajo enake in so navedene v stolpcu z naslovom „Dodatna oznaka TARIC“.
New reference
Izvzete stranke, za katere se posodobijo sklici
7575 DB Oldenzaal, Netherlands
Novi sklic
Netherlands
7575 DB Oldenzaal, Nizozemska
742 13 Studénka, Czech Republic
Nizozemska
Czech Republic
742 13 Studénka, Češka
56073 Koblenz, Germany
Češka
922 01 Veľké Orvište, Slovak Republic
56073 Koblenz, Nemčija
Slovak Republic
922 01 Veľké Orvište, Slovaška
300647 Timisoara, Judet Timis, Romania
Slovaška
F-85000 La Roche sur Yon, France
300647 Timisoara, Judet Timis, Romunija
85000 La Roche-sur-Yon, France
F-85000 La Roche sur Yon, Francija
France
85000 La Roche-sur-Yon, Francija
45023 Costa Di Rovigo, Italy
Francija
Italy
45023 Costa Di Rovigo, Italija
47900 Rimini (RN), Italy
Italija
1211 Budapest, Hungary
47900 Rimini (RN), Italija
Hungary
1211 Budapest, Madžarska
44270 Machecoul, France
Madžarska
25030 Trenzano (BS), Italy
44270 Machecoul, Francija
1370 Logatec, Slovenia
25030 Trenzano (BS), Italija
Slovenia
1370 Logatec, Slovenija
61-324 Poznań, Poland
Slovenija
20020 Vanzaghello (MI), Italy
61-324 Poznań, Poljska
33-386 Podegrodzie, Poland
20020 Vanzaghello (MI), Italija
Gruppo Bici Srl — Via Pitagora 15 — I-47023 Cesen a
33-386 Podegrodzie, Poljska
370 01 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
47521 Cesena, Italija
746 01 Opava 1, Czech Republic
370 01 České Budějovice, Češka
This Decision is addressed to the Member States and to the parties listed in Articles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
746 01 Opava 1, Češka
It is also published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na države članice in stranke iz členov 2, 3, 4, 5 in 6.
Done at Brussels, 16 April 2014.
Objavi se tudi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
For the Commission
V Bruslju, 16. aprila 2014
Member of the Commission
Za Komisijo
OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.
Član Komisije
OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p. 55.
UL L 343, 22.12.2009, str. 51.
OJ L 17, 21.1.1997, p. 17.
UL L 16, 18.1.1997, str. 55.
OJ L 343, 23.12.2011, p. 86.
UL L 17, 21.1.1997, str. 17.
OJ C 45, 13.2.1997, p. 3, OJ C 112, 10.4.1997, p. 9, OJ C 220, 19.7.1997, p. 6, OJ C 378, 13.12.1997, p. 2, OJ C 217, 11.7.1998, p. 9, OJ C 37, 11.2.1999, p. 3, OJ C 186, 2.7.1999, p. 6, OJ C 216, 28.7.2000, p. 8, OJ C 170, 14.6.2001, p. 5, OJ C 103, 30.4.2002, p. 2, OJ C 35, 14.2.2003, p. 3, OJ C 43, 22.2.2003, p. 5, OJ C 54, 2.3.2004, p. 2, OJ C 299, 4.12.2004, p. 4, OJ L 17, 21.1.2006, p. 16 and OJ L 313, 14.11.2006, p. 5, OJ L 81, 20.3.2008, p. 73, OJ C 310, 5.12.2008, p. 19, OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 62, OJ L 314, 1.12.2009, p. 106, OJ L 136, 24.5.2011, p. 99, OJ L 343, 23.12.2011, p. 86.
UL L 343, 23.12.2011, str. 86.
The parties are advised to use the following e-mail address: TRADE-BICYCLE-PARTS@ec.europa.eu.
UL C 45, 13.2.1997, str. 3, UL C 112, 10.4.1997, str. 9, UL C 220, 19.7.1997, str. 6, UL C 378, 13.12.1997, str. 2, UL C 217, 11.7.1998, str. 9, UL C 37, 11.2.1999, str. 3, UL C 186, 2.7.1999, str. 6, UL C 216, 28.7.2000, str. 8, UL C 170, 14.6.2001, str. 5, UL C 103, 30.4.2002, str. 2, UL C 35, 14.2.2003, str. 3, UL C 43, 22.2.2003, str. 5, UL C 54, 2.3.2004, str. 2, UL C 299, 4.12.2004, str. 4, UL L 17, 21.1.2006, str. 16, in UL L 313, 14.11.2006, str. 5, UL L 81, 20.3.2008, str. 73, UL C 310, 5.12.2008, str. 19, UL L 19, 23.1.2009, str. 62, UL L 314, 1.12.2009, str. 106, UL L 136, 24.5.2011, str. 99, UL L 343, 23.12.2011, str. 86.
OJ L 228, 9.9.1993, p. 1.
Strankam se priporoča, da uporabijo naslednji elektronski naslov: TRADE-BICYCLE-PARTS@ec.europa.eu.
S.C EUROBIKE UNIVERSAL S.R.L.,
1.
Veronese Luigi S.N.C. di Veronese Paolo e Elisabetta — Cicli Roveco
I-47900 Rimini, Italija
I-45023 Costa di Rovigo — IT
Gruppo Bici Srl – Via Pitagora 15 – I-47023 Cesena
I-47900 Rimini — IT
S.C EUROBIKE UNIVERSAL S.R.L. Street Asociatiei No.
Gruppo Bici Srl — Via Pitagora 15 — I-47023 Cesena
Metelli di Staffoni Mario & C. S.A.S.
on the transfer of assigned amount units to the Party to the Kyoto Protocol holding account in the registry of Finland
o prenosu enot dodeljenih količin pogodbenici Kjotskega protokola, ki ima račun v registru Finske
(notified under document C(2014) 2475)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2014) 2475)
Commission Decision 2006/944/EC [2] determines the respective emission levels for the Union and its Member States for the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol.
Odločba Komisije 2006/944/ES [2] določa ravni emisij za Unijo in njene države članice za prvo obdobje obveznosti Kjotskega protokola.
Commission Decision 2010/778/EU [3] amends Decision 2006/944/EC by establishing the final respective emission levels allocated to the Union and to each Member State and by providing that the final arithmetic difference of 19357532 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent between the emission levels of the Union and the sum of the emission levels of the Member States be issued as assigned amount units by the Union.
Sklep Komisije 2010/778/EU [3] spreminja Odločbo 2006/944/ES z določitvijo končnih ravni emisij, dodeljenih Uniji in vsaki izmed držav članic, in z določbo, da se končna aritmetična razlika, ki znaša 19357532 ton ekvivalenta ogljikovega dioksida med ravnmi emisij Unije in vsoto emisij držav članic, izda kot enote dodeljene količine s strani Unije.
Furthermore, that Decision provides for the transfer of five million of these assigned amount units from the Union registry to the Party to the Kyoto Protocol holding account in the registry of Denmark.
Poleg tega navedeni sklep določa prenos 5 milijonov enot teh dodeljenih količin iz registra Unije pogodbenici Kjotskega protokola, ki ima račun v registru Danske.
In the context of adopting Decision 2010/778/EU it was recognised that the transfer of the five million assigned amount units to Denmark is without prejudice to the ownership of the remaining Union arithmetic surplus.
V kontekstu sprejetja Sklepa 2010/778/EU je bilo ugotovljeno, da prenos pet milijonov enot dodeljenih količin Danski ne posega v lastništvo preostalega aritmetičnega presežka Unije.
In December 2011, the 17th Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (‘UNFCCC’) meeting in Durban adopted Decision 2/CMP.7 of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (‘Durban Decision’).
Decembra 2011 je na 17. konferenci pogodbenic Okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja (UNFCCC) na srečanju v Durbanu bil sprejet Sklep 2/CMP.7 konference pogodbenic kot sestanka pogodbenic Kjotskega protokola (sklep iz Durbana).
That decision sets out accounting rules for the land use, land-use change and forestry (‘LULUCF’) sector for a second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol (‘Kyoto Protocol’) to the UNFCCC.
Navedeni sklep določa pravila za obračunavanje v zvezi z rabo zemljišč, spremembo rabe zemljišč in gozdarstvom (LULUCF) za drugo obdobje obveznosti Kjotskega protokola k UNFCCC.
The Durban Decision deviates significantly from the previous accounting rules agreed under the Kyoto Protocol for the first commitment period.
Sklep iz Durbana znatno odstopa od prejšnjih pravil za obračunavanje, dogovorjenih v okviru Kjotskega protokola za prvo obdobje obveznosti.
Decision 16/CMP.1 of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol adopted by the 11th Conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC meeting in Montreal in December 2005 provides for limits as set out in the Annex to that Decision for the purpose of Parties' commitments under the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol.
Sklep 16/CMP.1 konference pogodbenic kot sestanka pogodbenic Kjotskega protokola, ki je bil sprejet na 11. konferenci pogodbenic UNFCCC decembra 2005 v Montrealu, določa omejitve, kot so določene v Prilogi k navedenemu sklepu za namene obveznosti pogodbenic v okviru prvega obdobja obveznosti Kjotskega protokola.
In addition, Decision 16/CMP.1 provides for Parties' possibility to exceed those limits by compensating net emissions (‘debits’) resulting from the activities of afforestation, reforestation and deforestation pursuant to Article 3(3) of the Kyoto Protocol by net removals (‘credits’) resulting from forest management activities pursuant to Article 3(4) of the Kyoto Protocol.
Dodatno sklep 16/CMP.1 določa možnost pogodbenic, da presežejo navedene omejitve s kompenzacijo neto emisij (bremenitve), ki izvirajo iz dejavnosti pogozdovanja, ponovnega pogozdovanja in krčenja gozdov na podlagi člena 3(3) Kjotskega protokola z neto odstranitvami (dobropisi), ki izvirajo iz dejavnosti gospodarjenja z gozdovi na podlagi člena 3(4) Kjotskega protokola.
That accounting rule is commonly referred to as the compensation rule.
Navedeno pravilo obračunavanja se splošno imenuje pravilo kompenzacije.
The Durban Decision does not provide for such a compensation rule for the second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol.
Sklep iz Durbana za drugo obdobje obveznosti Kjotskega protokola ne zagotavlja takšnega pravila kompenzacije.
The accounting rules laid down in the Durban Decision provide for a limit on the use of credits resulting from forest management activities in order to account for a mitigation commitment in the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol.
Pravila obračunavanja iz sklepa iz Durbana določajo omejitev pri uporabi dobropisov, ki izvirajo iz dejavnosti gospodarjenja z gozdovi, da se upoštevajo zaveze za blažitev posledic v drugem obdobju obveznosti Kjotskega protokola.
According to that decision, a Party cannot use more credits resulting from forest management activities than the equivalent of 3,5 % of that Party's emissions, excluding LULUCF, in its base year or period for complying with its mitigation commitment.
V skladu z navedenim sklepom pogodbenica v izhodiščnem letu ali obdobju za izpolnjevanje svojih zavez v zvezi z blažitvijo posledic ne more porabiti več dobropisov, ki izvirajo iz dejavnosti gospodarjenja z gozdovi, kot je ekvivalent 3,5 % emisij pogodbenice, brez LULUCF.
The changes to the LULUCF accounting rules as set out in the Durban Decision have a significant impact on the way in which Parties account for LULUCF activities for the second commitment period.
Spremembe pravil obračunavanja za LULUCF, kot je določeno v sklepu iz Durbana, imajo znaten učinek na način, na katerega pogodbenice obračunavajo dejavnosti LULUCF za drugo obdobje obveznosti.
Due to the geographical variation of the land sector, and the great diversity of national circumstances in this regard, the impact differs greatly between Member States.
Zaradi geografske raznolikosti zemljiškega sektorja in v tem smislu velikih razlik v nacionalnih okoliščinah se učinek med državami članicami močno razlikuje.
The exclusion of the compensation rule from the accounting rules set out in the Durban Decision has an impact on the fulfilment of Parties' commitments under the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol.
Izključitev pravila kompenzacije iz pravil obračunavanja, določenih v sklepu iz Durbana, ima učinek na izpolnjevanje obveznosti pogodbenic za drugo obdobje obveznosti Kjotskega protokola.
This situation is especially relevant for forest rich countries, given that the conditions in the LULUCF sector differ from one country to another.
To stanje je še posebej pomembno za gozdnate dežele, glede na to, da se pogoji v sektorju LULUCF med državami razlikujejo.
The specific situation of richly forested countries was also recognised by the Council in 2012 in the process leading to the adoption of Decision No 529/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on accounting rules on greenhouse gas emissions and removals resulting from activities relating to land use, land-use change and forestry and information concerning actions relating to those activities [4] as reflected in the reference to environmental conditions in richly forested countries included in the preamble to that Decision.
Kot kaže, je Finska zaradi uporabe sklepa iz Durbana prizadeta na poseben in edinstven način.
Finland has repeatedly expressed concerns regarding its debits from deforestation for the LULUCF sector as a result of the change of the compensation rule in the Durban Decision.
Trenutne ocene kažejo, da je Finska edina država članica, za katero bi letna omejitev v višini 3,5 % pomenila, da ne more pokriti bremenitev iz dejavnosti pogozdovanja, ponovnega pogozdovanja in krčenja gozdov z dobropisi iz dejavnosti gospodarjenja z gozdovi pri obračunavanju obveznosti za drugo obdobje obveznosti Kjotskega protokola.
Finland appears to be affected by the application of the Durban Decision in a specific and unique manner.
Da bi se upošteval posebni in edinstveni položaj Finske, bi Unija Finski morala prenesti skupno količino, ki ne bi smela presegati deset milijonov enot dodeljenih količin iz aritmetičnega presežka, kar je določeno z Odločbo 2006/944/ES in spremenjeno s Sklepom 2010/778/EU.
Current assessments show that, Finland is the only Member State for which the annual limit of 3,5 % would mean that it cannot cover its debits resulting from the activities of afforestation, reforestation and deforestation with credits resulting from forest management activities when accounting for its commitment in the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol.
Ta skupna količina bi morala biti namenjena samo enkratni kompenzaciji za Finsko zaradi učinka spremembe pravila o kompenzaciji, in sicer v obsegu, ki je potreben za izpolnjevanje obveznosti za drugo obdobje obveznosti Kjotskega protokola.
To account for Finland's special and unique situation, the Union should transfer a total quantity which should not exceed 10 million assigned amount units from the arithmetic surplus provided for by Decision 2006/944/EC as amended by Decision 2010/778/EU to Finland.
Prenos bi bilo treba opraviti čim prej in pred koncem dodatnega obdobja za izpolnitev obveznosti za prvo obdobje obveznosti Kjotskega protokola, pod pogojem, da so v registru Unije na razpolago enote dodeljenih količin in ko bosta poravnana ali razrešena obveznost v zvezi s Hrvaško, kot je določena v Protokolu o nekaterih dogovorih o morebitnem enkratnem prenosu enot dodeljenih količin, ki se v okviru Kjotskega protokola k Okvirni konvenciji Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja izdajo za Hrvaško, ter ustrezno nadomestilo iz Pogodbe o pristopu Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji [5].
This total quantity should serve the sole purpose of a one-off compensation to Finland for the impact of the change of the compensation rule, to the extent that this is necessary to enable it to comply with the commitments in the second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol.
Uporaba navedenih enot dodeljenih količin s strani Finske ne sme preseči dobropisov, ki izvirajo iz dejavnosti gospodarjenja z gozdovi na Finskem, ki niso dovoljene za uporabo v skladu z odstavkom 13 Priloge k sklepu iz Durbana.
That transfer should be made as soon as possible and before the end of the true up period for the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol, subject to the availability of assigned amount units in the Union registry and when the commitment regarding Croatia as set out in the Protocol on certain arrangements concerning a possible one-off transfer of assigned amount units issued under the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to the Republic of Croatia, as well as the related compensation to the Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union [5] has been settled or resolved.
Komisija je ustrezno upoštevala zavezo Finske, da bo izbrisala vse morebitne enote dodeljenih količin, ki bi na koncu drugega obdobja obveznosti preostale iz tega prenosa.
The use of those assigned amount units by Finland must not exceed credits resulting from forest management activities in Finland that are disallowed for use in accordance with paragraph 13 of the Annex to the Durban Decision.
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za podnebne spremembe –
The Commission has taken due consideration of Finland's commitment to cancel any assigned amount units remaining from this transfer at the end of the second commitment period.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJI SKLEP:
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Climate Change Committee,
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Največ deset milijonov (10000000) enot dodeljenih količin iz člena 2 Odločbe 2006/944/ES se da na razpolago Finski za doseganje skladnosti z njenimi obveznostmi iz drugega obdobja obveznosti Kjotskega protokola.
Article 1
Centralni administrator registra Unije čim prej in pred koncem dodatnega obdobja za izpolnitev obveznosti za prvo obdobje obveznosti Kjotskega protokola prenese skupno količino, ki ne presega deset milijonov (10000000) teh enot dodeljenih količin, pogodbenici Kjotskega protokola, ki ima račun v registru Finske.
A maximum of 10 million (10000000) of the assigned amount units referred to in Article 2 of Decision 2006/944/EC shall be made available for the purpose of enabling Finland's compliance with its commitments in the second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol.
Prenos iz odstavka 1 se opravi pod pogojem, da so v registru Unije na razpolago enote dodeljenih količin in ko bosta poravnana ali razrešena obveznost v zvezi s Hrvaško, kot je določena v Protokolu o nekaterih dogovorih o morebitnem enkratnem prenosu enot dodeljenih količin, ki se v okviru Kjotskega protokola k Okvirni konvenciji Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja izdajo za Hrvaško, ter ustrezno nadomestilo iz Pogodbe o pristopu Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji.
The Central Administrator of the Union registry shall transfer as soon as possible and before the end of the true up period for the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol a total quantity which shall not exceed 10 million (10000000) of these assigned amount units to the Party to the Kyoto Protocol holding account in the registry of Finland.
Člen 2
The transfer referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made subject to the availability of assigned amount units in the Union registry and when the commitment regarding Croatia as set out in the Protocol on certain arrangements concerning a possible one-off transfer of assigned amount units issued under the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to the Republic of Croatia, as well as the related compensation to the Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union has been settled or resolved.
Ta sklep je naslovljen na države članice.
Article 2
V Bruslju, 16. aprila 2014
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Za Komisijo
Done at Brussels, 16 April 2014.
Članica Komisije
For the Commission
UL L 130, 15.5.2002, str. 1.
Member of the Commission
UL L 358, 16.12.2006, str. 87.
OJ L 130, 15.5.2002, p. 1.
UL L 332, 16.12.2010, str. 41.
OJ L 358, 16.12.2006, p. 87.
UL L 165, 18.6.2013, str. 80.