natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Applicant's alternator has an increased efficiency compared to the baseline alternator by reducing the following three losses: rectification loss by new low-energy loss diode; stator iron loss by the use of thin and high-grade electromagnetic steel stator core, and stator copper loss by the use of ultra-high fill-factor stator and applied axial cooling structure.
Vlagateljev alternator ima povečano učinkovitost v primerjavi z osnovnim alternatorjem, saj zmanjša naslednje tri izgube: izgubo usmernika z uporabo nove diode z majhno izgubo energije; izgubo v železu statorja z uporabo tankega in visokokakovostnega elektromagnetnega jedra statorja iz jekla ter izgubo v bakru statorja z uporabo statorja z zelo visokim faktorjem polnjenja in osne hladilne konstrukcije.
The Commission finds that the information provided in the application demonstrates that the conditions and criteria referred to in Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 and in Articles 2 and 4 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011 have been met.
Komisija ugotavlja, da informacije iz prošnje dokazujejo, da so pogoji in merila iz člena 12 Izvedbene uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009 ter členov 2 in 4 Uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011 izpolnjeni.
The Applicant has demonstrated that a high efficiency alternator of the kind described in that application did not exceed 3 % of the new passenger cars registered in the reference year 2009.
Vlagatelj je dokazal, da tip visoko učinkovitega alternatorja, kot je opisan v navedeni prošnji, ni presegel 3 % novih osebnih vozil, registriranih v referenčnem letu 2009.
In order to determine the CO2 savings that the innovative technology will deliver when fitted to a vehicle, it is necessary to define the baseline vehicle against which the efficiency of the vehicle equipped with the innovative technology should be compared as provided for in Articles 5 and 8 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011.
Za določitev prihranka emisij CO2, ki ga bo omogočila inovativna tehnologija, ko bo vgrajena v vozilo, je treba opredeliti osnovno vozilo, s katerim bi bilo treba primerjati učinkovitost vozila, opremljenega z inovativno tehnologijo, kot je določeno v členih 5 in 8 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011.
Where the MELCO GXi efficient alternator is fitted to an existing vehicle type, the baseline technology should be the alternator of the most recent version of that type placed on the market.
Če se učinkoviti alternator MELCO GXi vgradi v obstoječ tip vozila, bi morala biti osnovna tehnologija alternator najnovejše različice tipa, ki je na voljo na trgu.
The Applicant has provided a methodology for testing the CO2 reductions which includes formulae that are consistent with the formulae described in the Technical Guidelines for the simplified approach with regard to efficient alternators.
Vlagatelj je zagotovil metodologijo preskušanja zmanjšanja emisij CO2, ki vključuje formule, ki so skladne s formulami iz tehničnih smernic za poenostavljeni pristop glede učinkovitih alternatorjev.
The Commission considers that the testing methodology will provide testing results that are verifiable, repeatable and comparable and that it is capable of demonstrating in a realistic manner the CO2 emissions benefits of the innovative technology with strong statistical significance in accordance with Article 6 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011.
Komisija meni, da se bodo z metodologijo preskušanja zagotovili preverljivi, ponovljivi in primerljivi rezultati ter da se bodo realno prikazale koristi inovativne tehnologije v zvezi z emisijami CO2 s pomembno statistično značilnostjo v skladu s členom 6 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011.
The Applicant has provided a methodology for testing the CO2 reductions which includes formulae which are based on the Technical Guidelines with regard to efficient alternators.
Vlagatelj je zagotovil metodologijo preskušanja zmanjšanja emisij CO2, ki vključuje formule, ki temeljijo na tehničnih smernicah v zvezi z učinkovitimi alternatorji.
The Commission notes that the Applicant's testing methodology and formulae to calculate the CO2 savings are in all respects identical to the methodology specified in the Annex to Commission Implementing Decision 2013/341/EU [5].
Komisija ugotavlja, da so preskusna metodologija vlagatelja in formule za izračun prihrankov emisij CO2 v vseh pogledih enake metodologiji, ki je opredeljena v Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2013/341/EU [5].
As a consequence, the Commission considers that the methodology specified in Implementing Decision 2013/341/EU should be used to determine the reduction in CO2 emissions due to the use of the MELCO GXi efficient alternator.
Zaradi tega Komisija meni, da bi bilo treba metodologijo, določeno v Izvedbenem sklepu 2013/341/EU, uporabiti za določitev zmanjšanj emisij CO2 zaradi uporabe učinkovitega alternatorja MELCO GXi.
Against that background the Commission finds that the Applicant has demonstrated satisfactorily that the emission reduction achieved by the innovative technology is at least 1 g CO2/km.
Glede na navedeno Komisija ugotavlja, da je vlagatelj zadovoljivo dokazal, da je inovativna tehnologija dosegla zmanjšanje emisij za najmanj 1 g CO2/km.
The Commission notes that the savings of the innovative technology may be partially demonstrated on the standard test cycle, and the final total savings to be certified should therefore be determined in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011.
Komisija ugotavlja, da bi bil lahko prihranek zaradi inovativne tehnologije delno prikazan v okviru standardnega preskusnega cikla, zato bi bilo treba končni skupni prihranek, ki se certificira, določiti v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 8(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011.
The Commission finds that the verification report has been prepared by the UTAC (Groupe UTAC CERAM) and that the report supports the findings set out in the application.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je poročilo o preverjanju pripravila družba UTAC (Groupe UTAC CERAM) ter da so v poročilu potrjene ugotovitve, navedene v prošnji.
For the purposes of determining the general eco-innovation code to be used in the relevant type approval documents in accordance with Annexes I, VIII and IX to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], the individual code to be used for the innovative technology approved through this Decision should be specified.
Za namene določanja splošne kode ekološke inovacije, ki se uporablja v zadevnih homologacijskih dokumentih v skladu s prilogami I, VIII in IX k Direktivi 2007/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], bi bilo treba določiti posamično kodo, ki se uporablja za inovativno tehnologijo, odobreno s tem sklepom.
Any manufacturer wishing to benefit from a reduction of its average specific CO2 emissions for the purpose of meeting its specific emissions target by means of the CO2 savings from the use of the innovative technology approved by this Decision should, in accordance with Article 11(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011, refer to this Decision in its application for an EC type-approval certificate for the vehicles concerned,
Vsak proizvajalec, ki želi izkoristiti ugodnosti, povezane z zmanjšanjem njegovih povprečnih specifičnih emisij CO2, da bi dosegel svoje ciljne specifične emisije s prihranki CO2 zaradi uporabe inovativne tehnologije, odobrene s tem sklepom, bi se moral v vlogi za pridobitev certifikata o ES-homologaciji za zadevna vozila v skladu s členom 11(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011 sklicevati na ta sklep –
The Mitsubishi Electric Corporation GXi efficient alternator having an increased efficiency by reducing three different losses and intended for use in M1 vehicles is approved as an innovative technology within the meaning of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009.
Učinkoviti alternator Mitsubishi Electric Corporation GXi, ki povečano učinkovitost doseže z zmanjšanjem treh različnih izgub in je namenjen uporabi v vozilih kategorije M1, se odobri kot inovativna tehnologija v smislu člena 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 443/2009.
The CO2 emissions reduction from the use of the alternator referred to in paragraph 1 shall be determined using the methodology set out in the Annex to Implementing Decision 2013/341/EU.
Zmanjšanje emisij CO2 zaradi uporabe alternatorja iz odstavka 1 se določi z metodologijo iz Priloge k Izvedbenemu sklepu 2013/341/EU.
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 11(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011, the CO2 emission reduction determined in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, may only be certified and entered into the certificate of conformity and relevant type approval documentation specified in Annexes I, VIII and IX to Directive 2007/46/EC where the reductions are on or above the threshold specified in Article 9(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011.
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 11(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011 se lahko zmanjšanje emisij CO2, določeno v skladu z odstavkom 2 tega člena, certificira in vpiše v certifikat o skladnosti in zadevno homologacijsko dokumentacijo, ki sta opredeljena v prilogah I, VIII in IX k Direktivi 2007/46/ES, samo če so zmanjšanja enaka mejni vrednosti iz člena 9(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 725/2011 ali večja.
The individual eco-innovation code to be entered into type approval documentation to be used for the innovative technology approved through this Decision shall be ‘12’.
Posamezna koda ekološke inovacije, ki jo je treba vnesti v homologacijsko dokumentacijo, ki se uporablja za inovativno tehnologijo, odobreno s tem sklepom, je „12“.
Done at Brussels, 24 February 2015.
V Bruslju, 24. februarja 2015
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 725/2011 of 25 July 2011 establishing a procedure for the approval and certification of innovative technologies for reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 194, 26.7.2011, p. 19).
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 725/2011 z dne 25. julija 2011 o uvedbi postopka za odobritev in certificiranje inovativnih tehnologij za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz osebnih vozil v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 443/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 194, 26.7.2011, str. 19).
Road vehicles — Alternators with regulators — Test methods and general requirements.
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2013/341/EU z dne 27. junija 2013 o odobritvi alternatorja Valeo Efficient Generation Alternator kot inovativne tehnologije za zmanjšanje emisij CO2 iz osebnih vozil v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 443/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 179, 29.6.2013, str. 98).
Reference number ISO 8854:2012(E).
Direktiva 2007/46/ES Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. septembra 2007 o vzpostavitvi okvira za odobritev motornih in priklopnih vozil ter sistemov, sestavnih delov in samostojnih tehničnih enot, namenjenih za taka vozila (Okvirna direktiva) (UL L 263, 9.10.2007, str. 1).
Commission Implementing Decision 2013/341/EU of 27 June 2013 on the approval of the Valeo Efficient Generation Alternator as an innovative technology for reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 179, 29.6.2013, p. 98).
Komisija ugotavlja, da je za ustrezno osnovno tehnologijo primerno šteti alternator s 67-odstotnim izkoristkom, če se inovativna tehnologija vgradi v nov tip vozila.
Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive) (OJ L 263, 9.10.2007, p. 1).
Cestna vozila – Alternatorji z regulatorji – Preskusne metode in splošne zahteve.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/296
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije (EU) 2015/296
establishing procedural arrangements for cooperation between Member States on electronic identification pursuant to Article 12(7) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market
o določitvi postopkovne ureditve za sodelovanje med državami članicami na področju elektronske identifikacije v skladu s členom 12(7) Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o elektronski identifikaciji in storitvah zaupanja za elektronske transakcije na notranjem trgu
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC [1], and in particular Article 12(7) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. julija 2014 o elektronski identifikaciji in storitvah zaupanja za elektronske transakcije na notranjem trgu in o razveljavitvi Direktive 1999/93/ES [1] in zlasti člena 12(7) Uredbe,
Cooperation between Member States on the interoperability and security of electronic identification schemes is essential to foster a high level of trust and security appropriate to the degree of risk in such schemes.
Sodelovanje med državami članicami na področju interoperabilnosti in varnosti shem elektronske identifikacije je nujno za spodbujanje visoke ravni zaupanja in varnosti, ki ustreza stopnji tveganja pri takih shemah.
Article 7(g) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 requires the notifying Member State to provide to other Member States a description of that scheme 6 months in advance, in order that Member States can cooperate in the way described in Article 12(5) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.
Člen 7(g) Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014 od držav članic priglasiteljic zahteva, da drugim državam članicam zagotovijo opis navedene sheme šest mesecev vnaprej, da lahko države članice sodelujejo na način, opisan v členu 12(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014.
Cooperation between Member States requires simplified procedures.
Za sodelovanje med državami članicami so potrebni poenostavljeni postopki.
Interoperability and security of electronic identification schemes cannot be created by procedures conducted in different languages.
Interoperabilnosti in varnosti shem elektronske identifikacije ni mogoče doseči s postopki, ki se izvajajo v različnih jezikih.
The use of the English language during cooperation should facilitate reaching interoperability and security of electronic identification schemes, however, translation of already existing documentation should not cause unreasonable burden.
Uporaba angleškega jezika pri sodelovanju naj bi olajšala doseganje interoperabilnosti in varnosti shem elektronske identifikacije, vendar pa prevod že obstoječe dokumentacije ne bi smel povzročiti nesorazmernega bremena.
Various elements of the electronic identification schemes are managed by different authorities or bodies in the Member States.
Različne elemente sheme elektronske identifikacije upravljajo različni organi ali telesa v državah članicah.
In order to allow effective cooperation and simplify administrative procedures, it is appropriate to ensure that each Member State has a single point through which its relevant authorities and bodies can be reached.
Da se omogoči učinkovito sodelovanje in poenostavijo upravni postopki, je potrebno zagotoviti, da ima vsaka država članica enotno kontaktno točko, prek katere so dosegljivi njeni pristojni organi in telesa.
Exchange of information, experience and good practice between Member States facilitates the development of electronic identification schemes and serves as a tool to reach technical interoperability.
Izmenjava informacij, izkušenj in dobre prakse med državami članicami olajša razvoj shem elektronske identifikacije in služi kot orodje za doseganje tehnične interoperabilnosti.
The need for such cooperation is specifically justified when it concerns adjustments of already notified electronic identification schemes, changes to electronic identification schemes on which information has been provided to Member States before notification, and when important developments or incidents occur that can affect interoperability or security of electronic identification schemes.
Potreba po takšnem sodelovanju je še posebej upravičena, kadar se nanaša na prilagoditve že priglašenih shem elektronske identifikacije, spremembe shem elektronske identifikacije, o katerih so bile državam članicam predložene informacije pred priglasitvijo, ali kadar pride do pomembnega razvoja ali dogodkov, ki lahko vplivajo na interoperabilnost ali varnost shem elektronske identifikacije.
Member States should also have the means to request such kind of information concerning interoperability and security of electronic identification schemes from other Member States.
Države članice bi morale imeti na voljo tudi sredstva, da zahtevajo takšne informacije o interoperabilnosti in varnosti shem elektronske identifikacije od drugih držav članic.
Peer review of electronic identification schemes should be viewed as a mutual learning process that helps to build trust between Member States, and ensures interoperability and security of notified electronic identification schemes.
Medsebojni strokovni pregled shem elektronske identifikacije bi bilo treba obravnavati kot proces vzajemnega učenja, ki prispeva k vzpostavitvi zaupanja med državami članicami in zagotavlja interoperabilnost in varnost priglašenih shem elektronske identifikacije.
This requires notifying Member States to provide sufficient information about their electronic identification schemes.
Zato morajo države članice priglasiteljice predložiti dovolj informacij o svojih shemah elektronske identifikacije.
The need for Member States to keep certain information confidential, when this is critical for security, must however also be taken into account.
Prav tako pa je treba upoštevati, da morajo države članice nekatere informacije ohranjati zaupne, kadar je to nujno potrebno za varnost.
In order to ensure that the peer review process is cost effective and produces clear and conclusive results, and to avoid placing an unnecessary burden on Member States, Member States should collectively conduct a single peer review.
Za zagotovitev, da je postopek medsebojnega strokovnega pregleda stroškovno učinkovit, prinaša jasne in prepričljive rezultate in po nepotrebnem ne obremenjuje držav članic, bi morale države članice skupaj izvesti en sam medsebojni strokovni pregled.
Member States should take into account independent third party assessments, if available, when cooperating on matters relating to electronic identification schemes, including when conducting peer reviews.
Države članice bi morale pri sodelovanju v zadevah v zvezi s shemami elektronske identifikacije, pa tudi pri izvajanju medsebojnih strokovnih pregledov, upoštevati ocene neodvisnih tretjih strani, če so na voljo.
In order to facilitate procedural arrangements to achieve objectives in Article 12(5) and (6) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, the Cooperation Network should be created.
Da bi olajšali postopkovno ureditev za doseganje ciljev iz člena 12(5) in (6) Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014, bi bilo treba vzpostaviti mrežo za sodelovanje.
This is to ensure the existence of a forum which can include all the Member States and engage them in a formalised manner to cooperate vis-à-vis the practicalities of the maintenance of the interoperability framework.
S tem bi se zagotovila vzpostavitev foruma, ki lahko vključuje vse države članice in jih na formaliziran način pritegne k sodelovanju glede praktičnih vidikov vzdrževanja interoperabilnostnega okvira.
The Cooperation Network should examine draft notification forms provided by Member States under Article 7(g) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and issue opinions providing indications as to the compliance of the schemes described therein with the requirements of Article 7 and Articles 8(1)-(2) and 12(1) of that Regulation and the implementing act referred to in Article 8(3) of that Regulation.
Mreža za sodelovanje bi morala preučiti osnutke obrazcev za priglasitev, ki so jih predložile države članice v skladu s členom 7(g) Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014, in izdati mnenja, ki zagotavljajo podatke o skladnosti v njih opisanih shem z zahtevami iz členov 7, 8(1) in (2) ter 12(1) navedene uredbe in izvedbenim aktom iz člena 8(3) navedene uredbe.
Article 9(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 requires notifying Member States to describe how the notified electronic identification scheme meets the requirements of interoperability pursuant to Article 12(1) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.
Člen 9(1)(e) Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014 določa, da morajo države članice priglasiteljice opisati, kako priglašena shema elektronske identifikacije izpolnjuje zahteve interoperabilnosti v skladu s členom 12(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014.
In particular, opinions of the Cooperation Network should be taken into consideration by Member States when preparing to discharge of their obligation under Article 9(1)(e) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 to describe to the Commission how the notified electronic identification scheme meets the requirements of interoperability pursuant to Article 12(1) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.
Zlasti bi morale države članice upoštevati mnenja mreže za sodelovanje pri pripravi na izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti iz člena 9(1)(e) Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014, namreč Komisiji opisati, kako priglašena shema elektronske identifikacije izpolnjuje zahteve interoperabilnosti v skladu s členom 12(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014.
All parties involved in notification should take note of the opinion of the Cooperation Network as guidance to the full cooperation, notification and interoperability processes.
Vse strani, ki so vključene v priglasitev, bi morale upoštevati mnenje mreže za sodelovanje kot smernice za celoten postopek sodelovanja, priglasitve in zagotavljanja interoperabilnosti.
In order to ensure the effectiveness of the peer review process conducted under this Decision, it is appropriate for the Cooperation Network to provide guidance to the Member States.
Da bi se zagotovila učinkovitost postopka medsebojnih strokovnih pregledov, ki se izvajajo na podlagi tega sklepa, je primerno, da mreža za sodelovanje pripravi smernice za države članice.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 48 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014,
Ukrepi iz tega sklepa so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 48 Uredbe (EU) št. 910/2014 –
Pursuant to Article 12(7) of the Regulation, this Decision lays down the procedural arrangements for facilitating cooperation between Member States, as is necessary in order to ensure the interoperability and security of electronic identification schemes of which Member States are intending to notify or have notified the Commission.
V skladu s členom 12(7) uredbe ta sklep določa postopkovno ureditev za lažje sodelovanje med državami članicami, kar je potrebno za zagotovitev interoperabilnosti in varnosti shem elektronske identifikacije, o katerih države članice nameravajo uradno obvestiti ali so že uradno obvestile Komisijo.
The arrangements relate in particular to:
Ureditev se nanaša zlasti na:
the exchange of information, experience and good practice relating to electronic identification schemes and examination of the relevant developments in the electronic identification sector as set out in Chapter II;
izmenjavo informacij, izkušenj in dobrih praks v zvezi s shemami elektronske identifikacije in pregledom zadevnega razvoja v sektorju elektronske identifikacije, kot je določeno v poglavju II;
peer review of electronic identification schemes as set out in Chapter III; and
medsebojni strokovni pregled shem elektronske identifikacije, kot je določeno v poglavju III; ter
cooperation through the Cooperation Network as set out in Chapter IV.
sodelovanje prek mreže za sodelovanje, kot je določeno v poglavju IV.
Language of cooperation
Jezik sodelovanja
Unless otherwise agreed by the concerned Member States, the language of cooperation shall be English.
Razen če se zadevne države članice ne dogovorijo drugače, je jezik sodelovanja angleščina.