natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In Part 2 of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010, the veterinary certificate QUE is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
V delu 2 Priloge IV k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010 se veterinarsko spričevalo QUE nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
For a transitional period until 30 May 2014, the introduction into the Union of consignments of bees referred to in Article 7(3)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 accompanied by a veterinary certificate completed and signed in accordance with model QUE set out in Part 2 of Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 206/2010, in its version before the date of entry into force of this Regulation, shall be authorised.
Za prehodno obdobje do 30. maja 2014 se odobri vnos v Unijo pošiljk čebel iz člena 7(3)(a) Uredbe (EU) št. 206/2010, ki jim je priloženo veterinarsko spričevalo, izpolnjeno in podpisano v skladu z vzorcem QUE iz dela 2 Priloge IV k Uredbi (EU) št. 206/2010, v različici, ki je veljala pred datumom začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Commission Implementing Decision 2013/503/EU of 11 October 2013 recognising parts of the Union as free from varroosis in bees and establishing additional guarantees required in intra-Union trade and imports for the protection of their varroosis-free status (OJ L 273, 15.10.2013, p. 38).
Izvedbeni sklep Komisije 2013/503/EU z dne 11. oktobra 2013 o priznanju delov Unije kot prostih varooze čebel in o določitvi dodatnih jamstev, ki so potrebna za trgovanje znotraj Unije in uvoz za zaščito njihovega statusa brez varooze (UL L 273, 15.10.2013, str. 38).
‘Model QUE
„Vzorec QUE
they come from the territory with code: … (1) in which, American foulbrood, the small hive beetle (Aethina tumida) and the Tropilaelaps mite (Tropilaelaps spp.) are notifiable diseases/pests.
izvirajo z ozemlja z oznako: … (1), na katerem so huda gniloba čebelje zalege, mali panjski hrošč (Aethina tumida) in pršica Tropilaelaps (Tropilaelaps spp.) bolezni/škodljivci, ki jih je treba obvezno prijaviti;
come from an area which is not subject to any restrictions associated with an occurrence of American foulbrood, and where no such occurrence has taken place within at least 30 days prior to the issuance of the present certificate.
izvirajo z območja, za katerega ne veljajo nobene omejitve, povezane s pojavom hude gnilobe čebelje zalege, in na katerem ni bilo nobenega takega pojava vsaj 30 dni pred izdajo tega spričevala.
are from hives or come from hives or colonies (in the case of bumble bees) from which samples of the comb have been tested in the last 30 days for American foulbrood as laid down in the OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for terrestrial Animals with negative results;
so iz panjev ali prihajajo iz panjev ali kolonij (pri čmrljih), iz katerih so bili v zadnjih 30 dneh testirani vzorci satja na hudo gnilobo čebelje zalege, kot je določeno v Priročniku diagnostičnih testov in cepiv za kopenske živali (OIE), rezultati pa so bili negativni;
come from an area of at least 100 km radius which is not subject to any restrictions associated with the occurrence of the small hive beetle (Aethina tumida) or Tropilaelaps spp., and where these infestations are absent;
prihajajo z območja s polmerom najmanj 100 km, za katero ne veljajo nikakršne omejitve v zvezi s pojavom malega panjskega hrošča (Aethina tumida) ali Tropilaelaps spp., in z območij, na katerih takšnih škodljivcev ni;
Have undergone detailed examinations to ensure that all bees and packaging do not contain the small hive beetle (Aethina tumida) or their eggs and larvae, or other infestations, in particular Tropilaelaps spp., affecting bees.
so bile podrobno pregledane za zagotovitev, da pri čebelah in embalaži ni prisoten mali panjski hrošč (Aethina tumida) ali njegova jajčeca ali ličinke ali drugi škodljivci, zlasti Tropilaelaps spp., ki prizadenejo čebele;
the packaging material, queen cages, accompanying products and food are new and have not been in contact with diseased bees or brood-combs, and all precautions have been taken to prevent contamination with agents causing diseases or infestations of bees.
material za embalažo, matičnice, spremljajoči proizvodi in hrana so novi ter niso bili v stiku z obolelimi čebelami ali zaleženim satjem, izvedeni so bili tudi vsi ukrepi za preprečitev kontaminacije s povzročitelji bolezni ali infestacij.
Box reference I.12: the introduction of queen bees and their accompanying attendants (Apis mellifera) is not authorised into the territories of Member States listed in the third column of the table set out in the Annex to Commission Implementing Decision 2013/503/EU (OJ L 273, 15.10.2013, p. 38).
Rubrika I.12: vnos matic in njihovih spremljevalk (Apis mellifera) na ozemlja držav članic iz tretjega stolpca preglednice v Prilogi k Izvedbenemu sklepu Komisije 2013/503/EU (UL L 273, 15.10.2013, str. 38) ni dovoljen.
Box reference I.20: Number of queen bees (Apis mellifera and Bombus spp.).
Rubrika I.20: število matic (Apis mellifera in Bombus spp.).
Code of the territory as it appears in Part 1 of Annex II or Section 1 of Part 1 of Annex IV to Commission Regulation (EU) No 206/2010.
Oznaka ozemlja, kakor je navedena v delu 1 Priloge II ali oddelku 1 dela 1 Priloge IV k Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 206/2010.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1045/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1045/2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1046/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1046/2013
on the issue of licences for importing rice under the tariff quotas opened for the October 2013 subperiod by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1273/2011
o izdaji uvoznih dovoljenj za riž v okviru tarifnih kvot, odprtih z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1273/2011 za podobdobje oktober 2013
The notifications sent in accordance with point (a) of Article 8 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1273/2011 show that, for the quota with order number 09.4138, the applications lodged in the first 10 working days of October 2013 under Article 4(1) of that Implementing Regulation cover a quantity greater than that available.
Iz sporočil, poslanih v skladu s členom 8(a) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1273/2011, izhaja, da zahtevki za kvoto z zaporedno številko 09.4138, predloženi v prvih desetih delovnih dneh meseca oktobra 2013 v skladu s členom 4(1) navedene izvedbene uredbe, zajemajo količino, ki je večja od razpoložljive.
The notifications also show that, for the quota with order number 09.4148, the applications lodged in the first 10 working days of October 2013 under Article 4(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1273/2011 cover a quantity less than that available.
Iz sporočil izhaja tudi, da zahtevki za kvoto z zaporedno številko 09.4148, predloženi v prvih desetih delovnih dneh meseca oktobra 2013 v skladu s členom 4(1) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1273/2011, zajemajo količino, ki je manjša od razpoložljive.
The final percentage take-up for 2013 of each quota provided for by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1273/2011 should also be made known.
Prav tako bi bilo treba sporočiti končni odstotek porabe vsake kvote iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1273/2011 v letu 2013.
For import licence applications for rice under the quota with order number 09.4138 referred to in Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1273/2011 lodged in the first 10 working days of October 2013, licences shall be issued for the quantity requested, multiplied by the allocation coefficient set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Na podlagi zahtevkov za uvozna dovoljenja za riž v okviru kvote z zaporedno številko 09.4138 iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1273/2011, predloženih v prvih desetih delovnih dneh meseca oktobra 2013, se izdajo dovoljenja za zahtevano količino, ki se pomnoži s koeficientom dodelitve iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
The final percentage take-up for 2013 of each quota provided for by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1273/2011 is given in the Annex to this Regulation.
Končni odstotek porabe vsake kvote iz Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1273/2011 v letu 2013 je naveden v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Quantities to be allocated for the October 2013 subperiod under Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1273/2011 and final percentage take-up for 2013
Količine, ki se na podlagi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1273/2011 dodelijo za podobdobje oktober 2013, in končni odstotki porabe za leto 2013
Allocation coefficient for October 2013 subperiod
Koeficient dodelitve za podobdobje oktober 2013
Final percentage take-up of the quota for 2013
Končni odstotek porabe kvote za leto 2013
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1047/2013
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1047/2013
amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013 for the purpose of correcting the 2010 average specific CO2 emissions specified for the manufacturer Piaggio
o spremembi Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 114/2013 zaradi popravka povprečnih specifičnih emisij CO2 za leto 2010, določenih za proizvajalca Piaggio
The manufacturer of light commercial vehicles, Piaggio, has informed the Commission that the average specific CO2 emissions in 2010 specified for that manufacturer in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013 of 6 November 2012 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to rules for the application for a derogation from the specific CO2 emissions targets for new light commercial vehicles [2] are incorrect.
Proizvajalec lahkih gospodarskih vozil Piaggio je obvestil Komisijo, da so povprečne specifične emisije CO2 v letu 2010, določene za navedenega proizvajalca v Delegirani uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 114/2013 z dne 6. novembra 2012 o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 510/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z določitvijo pravil glede zahtevkov za odstopanje od ciljev specifičnih emisij CO2 za nova lahka gospodarska vozila [2], napačne.
The manufacturer has provided detailed evidence demonstrating that the average specific CO2 emissions in 2010 were significantly higher than the value indicated in that Regulation.
Proizvajalec je predložil podrobne dokaze, da so bile povprečne specifične emisije CO2 v letu 2010 znatno višje od vrednosti iz navedene uredbe.
The Commission has assessed the evidence provided by Piaggio and considers that it is appropriate to correct the value.
Komisija je ocenila dokaze družbe Piaggio in meni, da je primerno vrednost popraviti.
Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Delegirano uredbo (EU) št. 114/2013 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
In the list in Annex III to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013, the entry in the second column, with the heading ‘Average emissions, (g/km)’, for the make ‘Piaggio’ is replaced by ‘177,00’.
Na seznamu iz Priloge III k Delegirani uredbi (EU) št. 114/2013 se vnos v drugem stolpcu z naslovom „Povprečne emisije (g/km)“ za znamko „Piaggio“ nadomesti s „177,00“.
OJ L 38, 9.2.2013, p. 1.
UL L 38, 9.2.2013, str. 1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1048/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1048/2013
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 of 22 July 2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences from 1 January 2009 and amending Regulations (EC) No 552/97, (EC) No 1933/2006 and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1100/2006 and (EC) No 964/2007 [1] and in particular Article 11(7) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008 z dne 22. julija 2008 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov od 1. januarja 2009 in spremembah uredb (ES) št. 552/97, (ES) št. 1933/2006 in uredb Komisije (ES) št. 1100/2006 in (ES) št. 964/2007 [1] ter zlasti člena 11(7) Uredbe,
Pursuant to Article 1(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 [2], a country listed as least-developed country in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 is eligible to be added to Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 828/2009.
V skladu s členom 1(4) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 828/2009 [2] je država, ki je uvrščena na seznam najmanj razvitih držav v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 732/2008, upravičena do uvrstitve v Prilogo I k Uredbi (ES) št. 828/2009.
Myanmar/Burma has been reinstated into to the scheme of generalised tariff preferences on 19 July 2013, with retroactive effect as from 13 June 2012, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 607/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 552/97 temporarily withdrawing access to generalised tariff preferences from Myanmar/Burma [3].
Mjanmar/Burma je bila dne 19. julija 2013 ponovno uvrščena v shemo splošnih tarifnih preferencialov, z retroaktivnim učinkom od 13. junija 2012, v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 607/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. junija 2013 o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 552/97 o začasnem umiku dostopa Mjanmara/Burme do splošnih tarifnih preferencialov [3].
Myanmar/Burma is a least-developed country listed as least-developed country in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 and has requested the Commission to be listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 828/2009.
Mjanmar/Burma, ki je ena od najmanj razvitih držav s seznama najmanj razvitih držav v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 732/2008, je zaprosila Komisijo za uvrstitev na seznam v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 828/2009.
Myanmar/Burma produces sugar and is therefore a potential exporter to the Union.
Mjanmar/Burma proizvaja sladkor in je zato potencialna izvoznica v Evropsko unijo.
Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 828/2009 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
OJ L 181, 29.6.2013, p. 13.
UL L 181, 29.6.2013, str. 13.
‘Part I: Least Developed Countries
„Del I: Najmanj razvite države
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1049/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1049/2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1050/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1050/2013
Regulation (EU) No 1051/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 1051/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 in order to provide for common rules on the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders in exceptional circumstances
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 562/2006 za zagotovitev skupnih pravil o začasni ponovni uvedbi nadzora na notranjih mejah v izrednih razmerah
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 77(1) and (2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti člena 77(1) in (2) Pogodbe,
The creation of an area in which the free movement of persons across internal borders is ensured is one of the main achievements of the Union.
Oblikovanje območja, na katerem je zagotovljeno prosto gibanje oseb prek notranjih meja, je eden od največjih dosežkov Unije.
In an area without internal border control, it is necessary to have a common response to situations seriously affecting the public policy or internal security of that area, of parts thereof, or of one or more Member States, by allowing for the temporary reintroduction of internal border control in exceptional circumstances, but without jeopardising the principle of the free movement of persons.
Na območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah je potreben skupen odziv na razmere, ki resno vplivajo na javni red ali notranjo varnost bodisi tega območja, njegovih delov ali ene ali več držav članic, in sicer tako, da se v izrednih razmerah dovoli začasna ponovna uvedba nadzora na notranjih mejah, ki pa ne ogroža načela prostega gibanja oseb.
Given the impact that such measures of last resort may have on all persons having the right to move within the area without internal border control, the conditions and procedures for reintroducing such measures should be laid down, in order to ensure that they are exceptional and that the principle of proportionality is respected.
Glede na učinek, ki bi ga takšni skrajni ukrepi lahko imeli na vse osebe, ki imajo pravico do prostega gibanja na območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah, bi bilo treba določiti pogoje in postopke za ponovno uvedbo takšnih ukrepov, da se zagotovita njihova izredna narava in upoštevanje načela sorazmernosti.
The scope and duration of any temporary reintroduction of such measures should be restricted to the bare minimum needed to respond to a serious threat to public policy or internal security.
Obseg in trajanje vsake začasne ponovne uvedbe takšnih ukrepov bi morala biti omejena na najmanjšo možno mero, ki je potrebna za odziv na resno grožnjo javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti.
Free movement of persons within the area without internal border control is a key Union achievement.
Prosto gibanje oseb na območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah je ključen dosežek Unije.
As free movement of persons is affected by the temporary reintroduction of internal border control, any decision to reintroduce such control should be taken in accordance with commonly agreed criteria and should be duly notified to the Commission or be recommended by a Union institution.
Ker začasna ponovna uvedba nadzora na notranjih mejah vpliva na prosto gibanje oseb, bi se morale vse odločitve o ponovni uvedbi takšnega nadzora sprejemati v skladu s skupaj dogovorjenimi merili, o čemer bi morala biti Komisija uradno obveščena, ali pa bi morala takšen ukrep priporočiti institucija Unije.
In any case, the reintroduction of internal border control should remain an exception and should only be effected as a measure of last resort, for a strictly limited scope and period of time, based on specific objective criteria and on an assessment of its necessity which should be monitored at Union level.
V vsakem primeru bi se morala ponovna uvedba nadzora na notranjih mejah še naprej uporabljati izjemoma in le v skrajnem primeru, z natančno določenim obsegom in trajanjem, temeljiti pa bi morala na posebnih objektivnih merilih in oceni o njeni nujnosti, kar bi bilo treba spremljati na ravni Unije.
Where a serious threat to public policy or internal security requires immediate action, a Member State should be able to reintroduce border control at its internal borders for a period not exceeding ten days.
Kadar resna grožnja javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti zahteva takojšnje ukrepanje, bi morala država članica imeti možnost ponovno uvesti nadzor na svojih notranjih mejah za obdobje, ki ne presega desetih dni.
Any prolongation of that period needs to be monitored at Union level.
Vsakršno podaljšanje tega obdobja je treba spremljati na ravni Unije.
The necessity and proportionality of reintroducing internal border control should be balanced against the threat to public policy or internal security triggering the need for such reintroduction, as should alternative measures which could be taken at national or Union level, or both, and the impact of such control on the free movement of persons within the area without internal border control.
Nujnost in sorazmernost ponovne uvedbe nadzora na notranjih mejah bi bilo treba pretehtati glede na grožnjo javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, zaradi katere je nastala potreba za takšno ponovno uvedbo nadzora, pretehtati pa bi bilo treba tudi alternativne ukrepe, ki bi se lahko sprejeli na nacionalni ravni, na ravni Unije ali na obeh ravneh, ter učinek takšnega nadzora na prosto gibanje oseb na območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah.
The reintroduction of internal border control might exceptionally be necessary in the case of a serious threat to public policy or to internal security at the level of the area without internal border control or at national level, in particular following terrorist incidents or threats, or because of threats posed by organised crime.
Ponovna uvedba nadzora na notranjih mejah bi bila izjemoma lahko potrebna v primeru resne grožnje javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti na ravni območja brez nadzora na notranjih mejah ali na nacionalni ravni, zlasti po terorističnih napadih ali grožnjah ali zaradi groženj, ki jih predstavlja organiziran kriminal.
Migration and the crossing of external borders by a large number of third-country nationals should not, per se, be considered to be a threat to public policy or internal security.
Migracij in velikega števila državljanov tretjih držav, ki prečkajo zunanje meje, samih po sebi ne bi smeli obravnavati kot grožnjo javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti.
In accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, a derogation from the fundamental principle of free movement of persons must be interpreted strictly and the concept of public policy presupposes the existence of a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije je treba odstopanje od temeljnega načela prostega gibanja oseb razlagati ozko, pojem javnega reda pa predvideva obstoj dejanske, prisotne in dovolj resne grožnje, ki vpliva na enega od temeljnih interesov družbe.
Based on the experience gathered with respect to the functioning of the area without internal border control and in order to help ensure the consistent implementation of the Schengen acquis, the Commission may draw up guidelines on the reintroduction of internal border control in cases which require such a measure on a temporary basis and in cases where immediate action is needed.
Na podlagi doslej pridobljenih izkušenj v zvezi z delovanjem območja brez nadzora na notranjih mejah in da bi pripomogla k zagotavljanju usklajenega izvajanja schengenskega pravnega reda, Komisija lahko oblikuje smernice za ponovno uvedbo nadzora na notranjih mejah v primerih, ko je takšen ukrep potreben na začasni osnovi in v primerih, ko je potrebno takojšnje ukrepanje.
Those guidelines should provide clear indicators to facilitate the assessment of the circumstances that could constitute serious threats to public policy or internal security.
Te smernice bi morale vsebovati jasne kazalnike za lažjo oceno, katere so tiste okoliščine, ki bi lahko resno ogrožale javni red ali notranjo varnost.
Where serious deficiencies in the carrying out of external border control are identified in an evaluation report drawn up pursuant to Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 of 7 October 2013 establishing an evaluation and monitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis [2] and with a view to ensuring compliance with the recommendations adopted pursuant to that Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to recommend that the evaluated Member State take specific measures, such as deploying European border guard teams, submitting strategic plans or, as a last resort and taking into account the seriousness of the situation, closing a specific border crossing-point.
Kadar so v ocenjevalnem poročilu, pripravljenem v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 1053/2013 z dne 7. oktobra 2013 o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega in spremljevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda [2], ugotovljene resne pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju nadzora na zunanjih mejah in da se zagotovi upoštevanje priporočil, sprejetih na podlagi navedene Uredbe, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti izvedbena pooblastila, da bi lahko ocenjeni državi članici priporočila, naj sprejme posebne ukrepe, kot so razporeditev skupin Evropskih mejnih policistov, predložitev strateških načrtov oziroma – kot skrajni ukrep in ob upoštevanju resnosti razmer – zaprtje določenega mejnega prehoda.
In view of the terms of Article 2(2)(b)(iii) of that Regulation, the examination procedure is applicable.
V skladu s členom 2(2)(b)(iii) navedene uredbe se uporablja postopek pregleda.