natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, that exclusion should not apply to the supply of technical equipment necessary for the production, co-production and broadcasting of such programmes.
Vendar se ta izjema ne bi smela uporabljati za dobavo tehnične opreme, potrebne za produkcijo, koprodukcijo in oddajanje teh programov.
It should be recalled that arbitration and conciliation services and other similar forms of alternative dispute resolution are usually provided by bodies or individuals which are agreed on, or selected, in a manner which cannot be governed by procurement rules.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba, da storitve na področju arbitraže in spravnih postopkov ter druge podobne oblike alternativnega reševanja sporov običajno opravljajo organi ali posamezniki, imenovani ali izbrani na način, ki ga ni mogoče urediti s pravili o javnem naročanju.
It should be clarified that this Directive does not apply to service contracts for the provision of such services, whatever their denomination under national law.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da se ta direktiva ne bi smela uporabljati za javna naročila za opravljanje takšnih storitev, ne glede na njihovo poimenovanje v nacionalnih zakonodajah.
A certain number of legal services are rendered by service providers that are designated by a court or tribunal of a Member State, involve representation of clients in judicial proceedings by lawyers, must be provided by notaries or are connected with the exercise of official authority.
Izvajalce nekaterih pravnih storitev določi sodišče zadevne države članice, nekatere tovrstne storitve vključujejo zastopanje strank v sodnih postopkih po odvetnikih, nekatere morajo opravljati notarji ali pa so takšne storitve povezane z izvajanjem javne oblasti.
Such legal services are usually provided by bodies or individuals designated or selected in a manner which cannot be governed by procurement rules, such as for instance the designation of State Attorneys in certain Member States.
Takšne pravne storitve običajno opravljajo organi ali posamezniki, imenovani ali izbrani na način, ki ga ni mogoče urediti s pravili o javnih naročilih, to na primer velja za imenovanje državnih tožilcev v nekaterih državah članicah.
Those legal services should therefore be excluded from the scope of this Directive.
Tovrstne pravne storitve bi bilo zato treba izvzeti iz področja uporabe te direktive.
It is appropriate to specify that the notion of financial instruments as referred to in this Directive is given the same meaning as in other internal market legislation and, in view of the recent creation of the European Financial Stability Facility and the European Stability Mechanism, it should be stipulated that operations conducted with that Facility and that Mechanism should be excluded from the scope of this Directive.
Primerno je določiti, da pojem finančnih instrumentov, kakor je naveden v tej direktivi, pomeni isto kot v drugi zakonodaji na področju notranjega trga, ob upoštevanju nedavne vzpostavitve Evropskega instrumenta za finančno stabilnost in Evropskega mehanizma za stabilnost pa bi bilo treba določiti, da so posli, izvedeni v okviru navedenega instrumenta in navedenega mehanizma, izključeni iz področja uporabe te direktive.
It should finally be clarified that loans, whether or not they are in connection with the issuing of securities or other financial instruments or other operations therewith, should be excluded from the scope of this Directive.
Obenem bi bilo treba pojasniti, da bi morala biti iz področja uporabe te direktive izključena tudi posojila, ne glede na to, ali so povezana z izdajo vrednostnih papirjev ali drugih finančnih instrumentov ali z drugimi posli v zvezi z njimi.
It should be recalled that Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10] explicitly provides that Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC apply, respectively, to service contracts and public service contracts for public passenger transport services by bus or tramway, whereas Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 applies to service concessions for public passenger transport by bus or tramway.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba, da člen 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [10] izrecno določa, da se za pogodbe o izvajanju storitev in pogodbe o izvajanju javnih storitev avtobusnega ali tramvajskega javnega potniškega prevoza uporabljata direktivi 2004/17/ES oziroma 2004/18/ES, medtem ko se Uredba (ES) št. 1370/2007 uporablja za koncesije za storitve avtobusnega ali tramvajskega javnega potniškega prevoza.
It should furthermore be recalled that that Regulation continues to apply to public service contracts as well as to service concessions for public passenger transport by rail or metro.
Prav tako bi bilo treba opozoriti, da se navedena uredba še naprej uporablja za pogodbe o izvajanju javnih storitev ter koncesije za storitve javnega potniškega prevoza z železnico ali podzemno železnico.
To clarify the relationship between this Directive and Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, it should be provided explicitly that this Directive should not be applicable to public service contracts for the provision of public passenger transport services by rail or metro, the award of which should continue to be subject to that Regulation.
Da bi pojasnili razmerje med to direktivo in Uredbo (ES) št. 1370/2007, bi bilo treba izrecno določiti, da se ta direktiva ne bi smela uporabljati za pogodbe o izvajanju javnih storitev za opravljanje storitev javnega potniškega prevoza z železnico ali podzemno železnico, za sklepanje katerih bi bilo treba še naprej uporabljati navedeno uredbo.
In so far as Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 leaves it to national law to depart from the rules laid down in that Regulation, Member States should be able to continue to provide in their national law that public service contracts for public passenger transport services by rail or metro are to be awarded by a contract award procedure following their general public procurement rules.
Kolikor Uredba (ES) št. 1370/2007 nacionalnemu pravu dopušča, da odstopa od pravil iz navedene uredbe, bi morale imeti države članice v nacionalnem pravu še naprej možnost določiti, da se morajo pogodbe o izvajanju storitev javnega potniškega prevoza z železnico ali podzemno železnico sklepati po postopku, ki je v skladu z njihovimi splošnimi pravili o javnem naročanju.
It should therefore be clarified that services, which are covered by CPV code 85143000-3, consisting exclusively of patient transport ambulance services should be subject to the special regime set out for social and other specific services (the ‘light regime’).
Pojasniti bi bilo torej treba, da bi morala za storitve, ki so zajete s kodo CPV 85143000-3, pri katerih gre izključno za prevoz bolnikov z reševalnimi vozili, veljati posebna ureditev, določena za socialne in druge posebne storitve (v nadaljnjem besedilu: enostavnejša ureditev).
Consequently, mixed contracts for the provision of ambulance services in general would also be subject to the light regime if the value of the patient transport ambulance services were greater than the value of other ambulance services.
Posledično bi enostavnejša ureditev veljala tudi za mešana javna naročila za opravljanje storitev reševalnih vozil na splošno, če bi bila vrednost storitev za prevoz bolnikov z reševalnimi vozili višja od vrednosti drugih storitev reševalnih vozil.
It is appropriate to recall that this Directive applies only to contracting authorities of Member States.
Primerno je opozoriti, da se ta direktiva uporablja le za javne naročnike iz držav članic.
Consequently, political parties in general, not being contracting authorities, are not subject to its provisions.
Njene določbe zato ne veljajo za politične stranke na splošno, saj niso javni naročniki.
However, political parties in some Member States might fall within the notion of bodies governed by public law.
Vendar pa bi lahko politične stranke v nekaterih državah članicah uvrstili med osebe javnega prava.
However, certain services (such as propaganda film and video-tape production) are so inextricably connected to the political views of the service provider when provided in the context of an election campaign, that the service providers are normally selected in a manner which cannot be governed by procurement rules.
Vendar pa so nekatere storitve (kot so produkcija propagandnih filmov in videofilmov) tako zelo neločljivo povezane s političnimi stališči izvajalcev storitev, kadar se te opravljajo v okviru volilne kampanje, da so izvajalci storitev običajno izbrani na način, ki ga ni mogoče urediti s pravili o javnem naročanju.
Finally, it should be recalled that the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations are subject to rules other than those laid down in this Directive.
Nazadnje bi bilo treba opozoriti, da statut in financiranje evropskih političnih strank in evropskih političnih fundacij urejajo druga pravila in ne ta iz te direktive.
In certain cases, a contracting authority or an association of contracting authorities may be the sole source for a particular service, in respect of the provision of which it enjoys an exclusive right pursuant to laws, regulations or published administrative provisions which are compatible with the TFEU.
V nekaterih primerih je javni naročnik ali združenje javnih naročnikov edino, ki lahko opravlja določeno storitev, za kar ima na podlagi zakonov ali drugih objavljenih predpisov, ki so skladni s PDEU, izključno pravico.
It should be clarified that this Directive need not apply to the award of public service contracts to that contracting authority or association.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da te direktive ni treba uporabljati za oddajo javnih naročil storitev takemu javnemu naročniku ali združenju javnih naročnikov.
There is considerable legal uncertainty as to how far contracts concluded between entities in the public sector should be covered by public procurement rules.
Obstaja precejšnja pravna negotovost glede vprašanja, v kolikšni meri bi bilo treba pogodbe, sklenjene med subjekti v javnem sektorju, zajeti v pravila o javnem naročanju.
The relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union is interpreted differently between Member States and even between contracting authorities.
Države članice in celo javni naročniki si zadevno sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije razlagajo različno.
It is therefore necessary to clarify in which cases contracts concluded within the public sector are not subject to the application of public procurement rules.
Zato je treba pojasniti, v katerih primerih se za pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila, sklenjene v javnem sektorju, ne uporabljajo pravila o javnem naročanju.
Such clarification should be guided by the principles set out in the relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Tako pojasnilo bi moralo temeljiti na načelih iz ustrezne sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije.
The sole fact that both parties to an agreement are themselves public authorities does not as such rule out the application of procurement rules.
Dejstvo, da sta obe pogodbeni stranki tudi javna organa, samo po sebi ne izključuje uporabe pravil o javnem naročanju.
However, the application of public procurement rules should not interfere with the freedom of public authorities to perform the public service tasks conferred on them by using their own resources, which includes the possibility of cooperation with other public authorities.
Vendar pa uporaba pravil o javnem naročanju ne bi smela posegati v svobodo javnih organov, da izvajajo naloge na področju javnih storitev, za katere so pristojni, z uporabo lastnih virov, kar zajema tudi možnost sodelovanja z drugimi javnimi organi.
It should be ensured that any exempted public-public cooperation does not result in a distortion of competition in relation to private economic operators in so far as it places a private provider of services in a position of advantage vis-à-vis its competitors.
Treba bi bilo zagotoviti, da nobeno izvzeto javno-javno sodelovanje ne izkrivlja konkurence glede na zasebne gospodarske subjekte, tako da zasebnemu izvajalcu storitev zagotavlja prednost pred njegovimi konkurenti.
Public contracts awarded to controlled legal persons should not be subject to the application of the procedures provided for by this Directive if the contracting authority exercises a control over the legal person concerned which is similar to that which it exercises over its own departments, provided that the controlled legal person carries out more than 80 % of its activities in the performance of tasks entrusted to it by the controlling contracting authority or by other legal persons controlled by that contracting authority, regardless of the beneficiary of the contract performance.
Za javna naročila, ki se oddajo odvisnim pravnim osebam, se postopki iz te direktive ne bi smeli uporabljati, če javni naročnik obvladuje zadevno pravno osebo podobno kot svoje službe, pod pogojem, da odvisna pravna oseba več kot 80 % svojih dejavnosti izvaja za izvrševanje nalog, ki ji jih je poveril naročnik, ki jo obvladuje, ali druge pravne osebe, ki jih ta naročnik obvladuje, ne glede na to, kdo je upravičenec izvajanja naročila.
The exemption should not extend to situations where there is direct participation by a private economic operator in the capital of the controlled legal person since, in such circumstances, the award of a public contract without a competitive procedure would provide the private economic operator with a capital participation in the controlled legal person an undue advantage over its competitors.
Izvzetje ne bi smelo veljati za primere, ko je zasebni gospodarski subjekt neposredno udeležen v kapitalu odvisne pravne osebe, saj bi imel v takih okoliščinah zasebni gospodarski subjekt z udeležbo kapitala v odvisni pravni osebi z oddajo javnega naročila brez konkurenčnega postopka neupravičeno prednost pred konkurenti.
However, in view of the particular characteristics of public bodies with compulsory membership, such as organisations responsible for the management or exercise of certain public services, this should not apply in cases where the participation of specific private economic operators in the capital of the controlled legal person is made compulsory by a national legislative provision in conformity with the Treaties, provided that such participation is non-controlling and non-blocking and does not confer a decisive influence on the decisions of the controlled legal person.
Vendar pa glede na posebne značilnosti javnih organov z obveznim članstvom, kot so organizacije, pristojne za upravljanje ali izvajanje nekaterih javnih storitev, to ne bi smelo veljati v primerih, ko je udeležba določenih zasebnih gospodarskih subjektov v kapitalu odvisne pravne osebe obvezna na podlagi določbe nacionalne zakonodaje, v skladu s Pogodbama, pod pogojem, da takšna udeležba ni obvladujoča in zaviralna ter da ne vpliva odločilno na odločitve odvisne pravne osebe.
It should further be clarified that the decisive element is only the direct private participation in the controlled legal person.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba tudi, da je edini odločilen dejavnik neposredna udeležba zasebnega kapitala v odvisni pravni osebi.
Therefore, where there is private capital participation in the controlling contracting authority or in the controlling contracting authorities, this does not preclude the award of public contracts to the controlled legal person, without applying the procedures provided for by this Directive as such participations do not adversely affect competition between private economic operators.
Dejstvo, da je v javnem naročniku, ki obvladuje pravno osebo, ali v javnih naročnikih, ki obvladujejo pravno osebo, udeležen zasebni kapital, torej ne preprečuje, da bi se javna naročila oddala odvisni pravni osebi brez uporabe postopkov iz te direktive, saj takšna udeležba ne izkrivlja konkurence med zasebnimi gospodarskimi subjekti.
It should also be clarified that contracting authorities such as bodies governed by public law, that may have private capital participation, should be in a position to avail themselves of the exemption for horizontal cooperation.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba tudi, da bi morali imeti javni naročniki, kot so osebe javnega prava, v katerih je lahko udeležen zasebni kapital, možnost uveljavljati izvzetje zaradi horizontalnega sodelovanja.
Consequently, where all other conditions in relation to horizontal cooperation are met, the horizontal cooperation exemption should extend to such contracting authorities where the contract is concluded exclusively between contracting authorities.
Kadar je pogodba o izvedbi javnega naročila sklenjena izključno med javnimi naročniki, bi zato izvzetje zaradi horizontalnega sodelovanja moralo zajeti tudi take naročnike, če so izpolnjeni vsi drugi pogoji za horizontalno sodelovanje.
Contracting authorities should be able to choose to provide jointly their public services by way of cooperation without being obliged to use any particular legal form.
Javni naročniki bi morali imeti možnost, da se odločijo, da bodo prek sodelovanja skupaj izvajali svoje javne storitve, ne da bi morali uporabljati kakršno koli določeno pravno obliko.
Such cooperation might cover all types of activities related to the performance of services and responsibilities assigned to or assumed by the participating authorities, such as mandatory or voluntary tasks of local or regional authorities or services conferred upon specific bodies by public law.
Takšno sodelovanje bi lahko zajemalo vse vrste dejavnosti v zvezi z izvajanjem storitev in odgovornosti, ki so bile dodeljene sodelujočim organom ali so jih ti prevzeli, na primer obvezne ali prostovoljne naloge lokalnih ali regionalnih organov ali storitve, ki jih določenim organom nalaga javno pravo.
The services provided by the various participating authorities need not necessarily be identical; they might also be complementary.
Ni potrebno, da so storitve, ki jih izvajajo različni sodelujoči organi, nujno enake; lahko se tudi dopolnjujejo.
Contracts for the joint provision of public services should not be subject to the application of the rules set out in this Directive provided that they are concluded exclusively between contracting authorities, that the implementation of that cooperation is governed solely by considerations relating to the public interest and that no private service provider is placed in a position of advantage vis-à-vis its competitors.
Pravila iz te direktive se ne bi smela uporabljati za pogodbe o skupnem opravljanju javnih storitev, če so sklenjena izključno med javnimi naročniki, če se pri tem sodelovanju upoštevajo le vidiki javnega interesa in če noben zasebni izvajalec storitev nima prednosti pred svojimi konkurenti.
Such cooperation does not require all participating authorities to assume the performance of main contractual obligations, as long as there are commitments to contribute towards the cooperative performance of the public service in question.
Tako sodelovanje ne pomeni, da morajo vsi sodelujoči organi izvajati glavne pogodbene obveznosti, pod pogojem, da se zavežejo, da bodo prispevali k skupnemu izvajanju zadevne javne storitve.
In addition, the implementation of the cooperation, including any financial transfers between the participating contracting authorities, should be governed solely by considerations relating to the public interest.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba pri sodelovanju, vključno z vsakršnimi finančnimi transferji med sodelujočimi javnimi naročniki, upoštevati le vidike javnega interesa.
Certain cases exist where a legal entity acts, under the relevant provisions of national law, as an instrument or technical service to determined contracting authorities, is obliged to carry out orders given to it by those contracting authorities and has no influence on the remuneration for its performance.
V nekaterih primerih pravna oseba v skladu z ustreznimi določbami nacionalnega prava deluje kot podporna ali tehnična služba določenega javnega naročnika ter mora izvajati navodila, ki ji jih da zadevni javni naročnik, in tako nima vpliva na plačilo za svoje delo.
In view of its non-contractual nature, such a purely administrative relationship should not fall within the scope of public procurement procedures.
Tako popolnoma upravno razmerje zaradi nepogodbenega značaja ne bi smelo spadati na področje postopkov javnega naročanja.
The co-financing of research and development (R&D) programmes by industry sources should be encouraged.
Spodbujati bi bilo treba sofinanciranje programov raziskav in razvoja s strani industrije.
It should consequently be clarified that this Directive applies only where there is no such co-financing and where the outcome of the R&D activities go to the contracting authority concerned.
Zato bi bilo treba pojasniti, da se ta direktiva uporablja samo, kadar takega sofinanciranja ni in kadar rezultati dejavnosti raziskav in razvoja pripadajo zadevnemu javnemu naročniku.
This should not exclude the possibility that the service provider, having carried out those activities, could publish an account thereof as long as the contracting authority retains the exclusive right to use the outcome of the R&D in the conduct of its own affairs.
To pa ne bi smelo izključevati možnosti, da izvajalec storitev, ki je te dejavnosti izvedel, o njih objavi poročilo, pod pogojem, da javni naročnik obdrži izključno pravico uporabe rezultatov dejavnosti raziskav in razvoja pri izvajanju svojih dejavnosti.
However fictitious sharing of the results of the R&D or purely symbolic participation in the remuneration of the service provider should not prevent the application of this Directive.
Vendar pa uporabe te direktive ne bi smela preprečiti nikakršna navidezna izmenjava rezultatov dejavnosti raziskav in razvoja niti povsem simbolična udeležba pri plačilu izvajalca storitev.
Employment and occupation contribute to integration in society and are key elements in guaranteeing equal opportunities for all.
Zaposlitev in poklic prispevata k vključevanju v družbo ter sta ključna elementa pri zagotavljanju enakih možnosti za vse.
In this context, sheltered workshops can play a significant role.
V tem okviru so lahko invalidska podjetja zelo pomembna.
The same is true for other social businesses whose main aim is to support the social and professional integration or reintegration of disabled and disadvantaged persons, such as the unemployed, members of disadvantaged minorities or otherwise socially marginalised groups.
Enako velja za druga socialna podjetja, katerih glavni cilj je podpreti družbeno in strokovno vključevanje ali ponovno vključevanje invalidnih in prikrajšanih oseb, na primer brezposelnih, pripadnikov prikrajšanih manjšin ali drugače socialno marginaliziranih skupin.
However, such workshops or businesses might not be able to obtain contracts under normal conditions of competition.
Vendar se lahko izkaže, da taka podjetja pod običajnimi konkurenčnimi pogoji ne morejo dobiti javnega naročila.
Consequently, it is appropriate to provide that Member States should be able to reserve the right to participate in award procedures for public contracts or for certain lots thereof to such workshops or businesses or reserve performance of contracts to the context of sheltered employment programmes.
Zato je primerno določiti, da lahko države članice pravico do sodelovanja v postopkih javnega naročanja ali določenih sklopov teh naročanj prepustijo takim podjetjem ali da izvedbo naročil prihranijo izključno za programe zaščitnega zaposlovanja.