natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following the definitive disclosure the exporting producer claimed that the disclosed data was still not sufficient and argued, in particular that it was unclear whether the adjustment applied on the cost of coating took into account the cost of single-side coating, double-side coating or both.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je po dokončnem razkritju trdil, da razkriti podatki še vedno ne zadoščajo in zlasti, da ni jasno, ali so bili v prilagoditvi za stroške premazov upoštevani stroški enostranskega premaza, dvostranskega premaza ali stroški obeh.
As explained in recital 68 below no evidence was provided by interested parties demonstrating that there is a consistent difference in costs of production between single-side and double-side coated solar glass.
Kot je bilo pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 68, zainteresirane strani niso predložile nobenega dokaza, da obstaja dosledna razlika v stroških proizvodnje enostransko premazanega solarnega stekla in dvostransko premazanega solarnega stekla.
The Commission therefore did not make a distinction between single-side and double-side coated solar glass when calculating the level of the adjustment.
Komisija zato pri izračunu stopnje prilagoditve ni razlikovala med enostransko in dvostransko premazanim solarnim steklom.
Regarding injury the same exporting producer complained that in its specific disclosure document the sales prices and target prices of the Union producers in relation to two out of total five product types had been marked as limited or provided in ranged format for reasons of confidentiality.
Glede škode se je isti proizvajalec izvoznik pritožil, da so bile prodajne cene in ciljne cene proizvajalcev Unije pri dveh od skupno petih vrst izdelkov v njegovem posebnem dokumentu o razkritju označene za mejne ali zaradi zaupnosti navedene v obliki razpona.
The company also argued that in this case there is a high level of confidentiality whereby the name of only one sampled Union producer is known.
Družba je trdila tudi, da je stopnja zaupnosti zelo visoka, saj je znano ime le enega vzorčenega proizvajalca Unije.
Consequently, the company was of the opinion that even if for certain product types the information relates to the data of one or two Union producer(s) only, by no means it would be possible to identify of those companies, and as a result, to give significant competitive advantage to the exporting producer vis-à-vis any of its Union competitors individually or collectively.
Zato je družba menila, da tudi v primeru, če se informacije za določene vrste izdelka nanašajo na podatke le enega proizvajalca Unije ali dveh, proizvajalec izvoznik identitete teh družb nikakor ne bi mogel ugotoviti in na tak način pridobiti precejšnjo konkurenčno prednost v primerjavi s svojimi konkurenti iz Unije posamezno ali skupaj.
Under Article 20 of the basic Regulation the Commission is indeed bound to disclose after provisional measures the details underlying the essential facts and consideration on the basis of which the measures have been imposed.
Komisija mora na podlagi člena 20 osnovne uredbe po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov razkriti podrobnosti, na katerih temeljijo bistvena dejstva in premisleki, na osnovi katerih so bili uvedeni ukrepi.
However, the Commission is also obliged under Article 19 of the basic Regulation to treat as confidential any information which is such by nature or which is provided on a confidential basis.
Vendar mora Komisija v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe kot zaupne obravnavati vse informacije, ki so takšne po svoji naravi ali so predložene na podlagi zaupnosti.
In this particular case the actual sales prices and target prices of the Union producers for two product types have been either removed or replaced with ranges because the information of one of the product types comes exclusively from only one or two Union producer(s).
V tem konkretnem primeru so bile dejanske prodajne cene in ciljne cene proizvajalcev Unije za dve vrsti izdelkov odstranjene ali pa nadomeščene z razponi, ker sta informacije o eni vrsti izdelka predložila največ dva proizvajalca Unije.
In addition, it is a widely known fact in this business that this particular product type is not produced by any other Union producers.
Poleg tega je v tem sektorju splošno znano, da točno te vrste izdelka ne proizvaja noben drug proizvajalec Unije.
Consequently, the Commission considers this information confidential by nature since its disclosure would be of significant competitive advantage to competitors and/or would have a significantly adverse effect upon the company(ies) supplying the information.
Komisija zato meni, da je narava teh informacij zaupna, saj bi z njihovim razkritjem konkurenti pridobili precejšnjo konkurenčno prednost in/ali bi razkritje bistveno škodovalo družbi oziroma družbama, ki sta predložili informacije.
In addition, the same type of information has been removed for a second product type in order to avoid that the figures for the first product type could be deducted from the total figures available.
Poleg tega so bile odstranjene informacije iste vrste za drugo vrsto izdelka, da ne bi bilo mogoče od skupnih številk, ki so bile na voljo, odšteti številk za prvo vrsto izdelka.
Following definitive disclosure, the company reiterated its claim that the level of disclosure of injury margin calculations was insufficient and inadequate.
Družba je po dokončnem razkritju ponovila trditev, da je stopnja razkritja izračuna škode nezadostna in neustrezna.
Specifically, it complained that it was not clear how the second product type whose figures have been removed had been selected.
Pritožila se je zlasti, da ni jasno, kako je bila izbrana druga vrsta izdelka, v zvezi s katero so bile številke odstranjene.
The Commission clarifies that this was done on a purely random basis.
Komisija je pojasnila, da je bila druga vrsta izdelka izbrana povsem naključno.
As a solution to the alleged insufficient disclosure, the company proposed that its lawyers could meet the Commission’s staff and discuss in detail the dumping and injury margin calculations without taking a copy of any confidential document, or alternatively have access to a data room at the Commission’s premises where notes could be made.
Družba je kot rešitev za domnevno nezadostno razkritje predlagala, da bi se njeni odvetniki sestali z osebjem Komisije in podrobno razpravljali o izračunih dampinga in škode, ne da naredili kopijo katerega koli zaupnega dokumenta, ali pa namesto tega dobili dostop do „varne sobe“ v prostorih Komisije, kjer bi lahko izdelali zapiske.
The Commission could not accommodate this request.
Komisija tej prošnji ni mogla ugoditi.
In order for the company’s lawyers to be able to verify the calculations, exact figures from one or two companies would have to be provided.
Da bi lahko odvetniki družbe preverili izračune, bi morale biti predložene natančne številke ene družbe ali dveh družb.
This could not be done as the Commission is obliged to keep this data confidential in accordance with Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Tega ni mogoče storiti, saj mora Komisija te podatke v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe ohraniti zaupne.
Moreover, the Commission explicitly mentioned in the definitive disclosure that as far as any issues related to the company’s rights of defence are concerned — such as access to file — it may address itself to the Hearing officer under the Terms of Reference of the Hearing officer [4].
Komisija je poleg tega v dokončnem razkritju izrecno navedla, da se lahko družba glede vprašanj, povezanih z njeno pravico do obrambe, kot je na primer vpogled v spis, obrne na pooblaščenca za zaslišanje v okviru mandata pooblaščenca za zaslišanje [4].
The company however did not request an intervention of the Hearing officer within the deadline for submitting comments on the definitive disclosure.
Vendar družba v roku za predložitev pripomb o dokončnem razkritju ni zahtevala posredovanja pooblaščenca za zaslišanje.
In view of the above, the Commission rejects the claims made regarding possible violation of the procedural rights of the exporting producer in question.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega Komisija zavrača trditve glede morebitne kršitve procesnih pravic zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika.
As set out in recital 26 of the provisional Regulation, the product concerned is solar glass consisting of tempered soda-lime-flat-glass, with an iron content of less than 300 ppm, a solar transmittance of more than 88 % (measured according to AM1,5 300-2500 nm), a resistance to heat up to 250 °C (measured according to EN 12150), a resistance to thermal shocks of Δ 150 K (measured according to EN 12150) and having a mechanical strength of 90 N/mm2 or more (measured according to EN 1288-3) (‘the product concerned’, commonly referred to as ‘solar glass’).
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 26 začasne uredbe, je zadevni izdelek solarno steklo iz kaljenega natrij-kalcijevega ravnega stekla z vsebnostjo železa, manjšo od 300 ppm, z več kot 88-odstotno prepustnostjo sončne energije (merjeno v skladu z AM 1,5 300–2500 nm), toplotno odpornostjo do 250 °C (merjeno v skladu z EN 12150), odpornostjo proti temperaturnim spremembam Δ 150 K (merjeno v skladu z EN 12150) in mehansko trdnostjo 90 N/mm2 ali več (merjeno v skladu z EN 1288-3) („zadevni izdelek“, ki se običajno imenuje „solarno steklo“).
One exporting producer claimed after provisional disclosure that, contrary to what was stated in recital 32 of the provisional Regulation, horticultural glass which complies with the technical characteristics of solar glass, as defined in recital 26 of the provisional Regulation, should be excluded from the product scope.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je po začasnem razkritju trdil, da bi bilo treba vrtnarsko steklo, ki izpolnjuje tehnične značilnosti solarnega stekla iz uvodne izjave 26 začasne uredbe, izključiti iz obsega izdelka, kar je sicer v nasprotju z navedbo iz uvodne izjave 32 začasne uredbe.
First, according to the exporter, the physical characteristics of the horticultural glass are quite different from those of the solar glass: (i) horticultural glass has different sizes according to the requirement of the customers, while solar glass is in certain fixed sizes; (ii) the horticultural glass may be double-side coated, but the solar glass for photovoltaic modules (PV modules) is not double-side coated.
Po mnenju izvoznika so fizične značilnosti vrtnarskega stekla precej drugačne od fizičnih značilnosti solarnega stekla: (i) vrtnarsko steklo je v skladu z željami strank različnih dimenzij, solarno steklo pa se proizvaja le v določenih dimenzijah; (ii) vrtnarsko steklo je lahko obojestransko premazano, solarno steklo za fotonapetostne module pa ni premazano obojestransko.
Second, horticultural glass has allegedly different use: it cannot be used either for manufacturing PV modules or thermal collectors.
Vrtnarsko steklo naj bi imelo tudi drugačno uporabo: ni ga mogoče uporabiti za proizvodnjo fotonapetostnih modulov ali sončnih kolektorjev.
The Commission rejects the claim for the following reasons.
Komisija to trditev zavrača iz naslednjih razlogov.
Firstly, the fact that solar glass used for greenhouse manufacturing has different sizes than solar glass used for PV modules or thermal collectors is irrelevant since size requirements may vary both for PV modules and for greenhouses.
Dejstvo, da je solarno steklo, ki se uporablja za proizvodnjo rastlinjakov, drugačnih dimenzij kot solarno steklo, ki se uporablja za fotonapetostne module ali sončne kolektorje, ni pomembno, saj so za fotonapetostne module in rastlinjake lahko zahtevane različne dimenzije.
Also, any product exclusion on such basis may give rise to possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures.
Morebitna izključitev izdelka na takšni osnovi bi lahko omogočila izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom.
Secondly, horticultural glass sold on the market is not only double-side coated solar glass, but can also be non-coated and single-side coated.
Poleg tega se na trgu za vrtnarsko steklo ne prodaja le obojestransko premazano solarno steklo, temveč tudi enostransko premazano steklo ali steklo brez premaza.
Moreover, as explained in recital 68 below double-side coated glass is also used for both PV modules and thermal collectors.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 68, se obojestransko premazano steklo uporablja tako za fotonapetostne module kot sončne kolektorje.
Therefore, this physical characteristic cannot distinguish solar glass used for horticultural glass from any other use.
Zato na podlagi te fizične značilnosti solarnega stekla, ki se uporablja za vrtnarsko steklo, ni mogoče razlikovati od solarnega stekla za katero drugo uporabo.
Finally, it cannot be excluded that solar glass destined for greenhouse manufacturing will be used for manufacturing PV modules and/or thermal collectors.
Ni mogoče izključiti, da bo solarno steklo, namenjeno za proizvodnjo rastlinjakov, uporabljeno za proizvodnjo fotonapetostnih modulov in/ali sončnih kolektorjev.
After disclosure, one importer argued that since solar glass that can also be used as furniture glass was not excluded from the scope, this results in administrative burden and delays for companies.
Ker solarno steklo, ki se uporablja tudi za pohištveno steklo, ni bilo izključeno iz preiskave, je en uvoznik po razkritju trdil, da to za družbe pomeni večje upravno breme in zamude.
This is allegedly caused by the fact that companies are required to send test reports to Customs Authorities in the Union every time the Customs Authorities question if the goods being imported are subject to the measures.
Vzrok za to naj bi bilo dejstvo, da morajo družbe carinskim organom v Uniji ob vsakem preverjanju, ali za izdelek, ki se uvaža, veljajo ukrepi, poslati poročila o preskusih.
The Commission considers that those types of glass should not be excluded from the scope of the investigation, because solar glass can potentially have horticultural and furniture use.
Komisija meni, da se teh vrst stekla ne bi smelo izključiti iz preiskave, ker se lahko solarno steklo uporabi tudi za vrtnarsko in pohištveno steklo.
In order to ensure adequate protection of the Union industry against the injurious effect of the dumped imports, loopholes that may allow for circumvention should be avoided.
Zaradi ustrezne zaščite industrije Unije pred škodljivimi učinki dampinškega uvoza se je treba izogibati vrzelim, ki bi lahko omogočile izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom.
The positive effect of adequate protection outweighs the negative effect of the additional administrative burden arguably suffered by the importer concerned.
Pozitivni učinek ustrezne zaščite je večji od negativnega učinka dodatnega upravnega bremena, ki naj bi ga imel zadevni uvoznik.
Another exporting producer claimed that float glass should be excluded from the product scope since the one it produces is used in the building market and greenhouse market.
Drugi proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi bilo treba iz obsega izdelka izključiti plavljeno steklo, saj se plavljeno steklo, ki ga proizvaja, uporablja na trgih gradnje in rastlinjakov.
Moreover, it alleged that float glass is not used for PV modules manufacturing.
Poleg tega je trdil, da se plavljeno steklo ne uporablja pri proizvodnji fotonapetostnih modulov.
However, on the basis of the arguments put forward by the Commission in recital 33 of the provisional Regulation, the Commission reiterates that float glass clearly complies with the technical characteristics of solar glass, as set out in recital 26 of the provisional Regulation.
Vendar Komisija glede na trditve, ki jih je navedla v uvodni izjavi 33 začasne uredbe, potrjuje svoje mnenje, da plavljeno steklo izpolnjuje tehnične značilnosti solarnega stekla iz uvodne izjave 26 začasne uredbe.
Also, float glass is produced by both the Union industry and the exporting producers.
Plavljeno steklo proizvajajo tako industrija Unije kot proizvajalci izvozniki.
This is confirmed by publicly available information on the internet [5].
To potrjujejo informacije, javno dostopne na spletu [5].
In the absence of other comments regarding the product concerned and the like product, the conclusions reached in recitals 26 to 33 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom in podobnim izdelkom, se sklepi iz uvodnih izjav 26 do 33 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Following provisional disclosure and subsequently after definitive disclosure, one exporting producer claimed that the Commission erred in rejecting its request for MET.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je po začasnem razkritju in nato po dokončnem razkritju trdil, da se je Komisija napačno odločila, ko je zavrnila njegov zahtevek za TGO.
The same claim in relation to the MET determination had already been made at the provisional stage and was rejected by the Commission in recitals 43 and 47 of the provisional Regulation.
Enak zahtevek v zvezi z določitvijo TGO je bil predstavljen že v fazi začasne preiskave, Komisija pa ga je zavrnila v uvodnih izjavah 43 in 47 začasne uredbe.
The exporting producer claimed that the benefits received from preferential tax regimes and grants do not represent a significant proportion of their turnover.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da ugodnosti preferenčnih davčnih režimov in nepovratna sredstva ne pomenijo bistvenega dela njihovega prometa.
In this respect, it is recalled that this argument, along with other arguments, was already addressed in the Commission’s letter to the exporter dated 13 September 2013 in which the Commission notified the party with regard to its MET determination.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da je Komisija to trditev skupaj z drugimi trditvami že obravnavala v dopisu z dne 13. septembra 2013, ki ga je poslala izvozniku in v katerem je stranko obvestila o svoji odločitvi v zvezi s TGO.
In particular, it was stressed that due to the nature of this advantage, the absolute benefit received during the IP is irrelevant for assessing whether the distortion is ‘significant’.
Komisija je poudarila zlasti, da absolutna ugodnost, prejeta v OP, zaradi značaja te prednosti ni pomembna za ocenjevanje, ali je bilo izkrivljanje „bistveno“.
Having regard to the above, the finding that all MET claims should be denied, as established in recitals 34 to 47 of the provisional Regulation, is confirmed.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se potrdi ugotovitev iz uvodnih izjav 34 do 47 začasne uredbe, da je treba vse zahtevke za TGO zavrniti.
Selection of an analogue country
Izbira primerljive države
In the provisional Regulation, Turkey was selected as an appropriate analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
V začasni uredbi je bila v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe kot primerna primerljiva država izbrana Turčija.
One exporting producer claimed that Turkey is not a suitable analogue country for the purpose of establishing the normal value due to the fact that there is only one producer of solar glass in Turkey and that there are virtually no import of solar glass on the Turkish market.
En proizvajalce izvoznik je trdil, da Turčija ni primerna primerljiva država za ugotavljanje normalne vrednosti, saj je v Turčiji le en proizvajalec solarnega stekla, na turški trg pa se solarno steklo praktično ne uvaža.
The exporting producer also claimed that the profit margin on the Turkish domestic solar glass market was particularly high, therefore artificially inflating the level of the normal value.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil tudi, da je stopnja dobička na turškem domačem trgu solarnega stekla še posebej visoka, zato umetno napihuje stopnjo normalne vrednosti.
In addition, the same exporting producer recalled that there was no coating technology applied on the solar glass produced in Turkey and that none of the Turkish solar glass was produced using the float production process.
Poleg tega je isti proizvajalec izvoznik opozoril na to, da se za solarno steklo, proizvedeno v Turčiji, tehnologija premazov ne uporablja in da nobena vrsta turškega solarnega stekla ni bila proizvedena s proizvodnim procesom s plavajočo talino.
As a consequence, key elements needed for the establishment of the normal value could not be obtained from the Turkish domestic market of the like product.
Bistvenih elementov, potrebnih za določanje normalne vrednosti, zato ni bilo mogoče pridobiti s pomočjo turškega domačega trga za podobni izdelek.
The exporting producer therefore argued that Union prices should have been used instead as a basis for the determination of the normal value.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je zato trdil, da bi bilo treba za ugotavljanje normalne vrednosti namesto tega uporabiti cene Unije.
First, the Commission recalls that there are no significant trade barriers in Turkey concerning the like product.
Komisija najprej poudarja, da v Turčiji v zvezi s podobnim izdelkom ni nobenih bistvenih trgovinskih ovir.
Therefore, it cannot be concluded that the Turkish solar glass market is foreclosed to international trade.
Zato ni mogoče skleniti, da je turški trg solarnega stekla zaprt za mednarodno trgovino.
On the contrary, the market is open and the price on that domestic market of the like product is being determined freely by the interaction of supply and demand.
Ravno nasprotno, trg je odprt, ceno na tem domačem trgu za podobni izdelek pa prosto določata ponudba in povpraševanje.
Second, concerning the allegation of particularly high profits on the Turkish domestic market, the Commission underlines that it did not observe an excessive profit margin on the like product market in Turkey during the IP compared to profit margins realised by Union producers during the period considered.
Glede trditve, da je dobiček na turškem domačem trgu še posebej visok, Komisija poudarja, da ni ugotovila pretirane stopnje dobička na trgu za podobni izdelek v Turčiji v OP v primerjavi s stopnjami dobička proizvajalcev Unije v obravnavanem obdobju.
Third, the lack of certain product types in a third country does not make it unsuitable as an analogue country.
Tretjič, če v tretji državi ni nekaterih vrst izdelkov, to še ne pomeni, da ni primerna kot primerljiva država.
On the contrary, Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation stipulates that in the absence of domestic sales of certain product types the Commission shall construct a normal value based on the cost of production in the country of origin plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs and for profits.
Ravno nasprotno, člen 2(3) osnovne uredbe navaja, da Komisija v primeru, ko ni domače prodaje nekaterih vrst izdelka, normalno vrednost izračuna na osnovi proizvodnih stroškov v državi porekla, h katerim se doda razumen znesek za prodajne, splošne in upravne stroške in za dobiček.
The cost contribution for coating and the float production process were based on verified data from the Union industry.
Stroški premazov in stroški proizvodnega procesa s plavajočo talino so temeljili na preverjenih podatkih industrije Unije.
In view of the above, the claim that Turkey is not a suitable analogue country is rejected.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se trditev, da Turčija ni primerna primerljiva država, zavrne.
Also, the Commission cannot accept the argument that the normal value should have been established on the basis of prices actually paid in the Union.
Komisija prav tako ne more sprejeti trditve, da bi morala biti normalna vrednost določena na podlagi cen, ki se dejansko plačujejo v Uniji.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, the Commission can only revert to Union prices for determining normal value if it is not possible to determine that value on the basis of data from an appropriate analogue country.
Komisija lahko v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe za določanje normalne vrednosti cene Unije uporabi le, če te vrednosti ni mogoče določiti na podlagi podatkov iz primerne primerljive države.
Since an appropriate analogue country with sufficient cooperation from a producer was found to exist the Commission was obliged to determine the normal value based on the data from this analogue country and not revert to Union prices [6].
Ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da je na voljo primerna primerljiva država z enim proizvajalcem, ki je pokazal zadovoljivo pripravljenost za sodelovanje, je morala Komisija normalno vrednost določiti na podlagi podatkov iz te primerljive države in se ni mogla opreti na cene Unije [6].