natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The environmental impact assessment report to be provided by the developer for a project should include a description of reasonable alternatives studied by the developer which are relevant to that project, including, as appropriate, an outline of the likely evolution of the current state of the environment without implementation of the project (baseline scenario), as a means of improving the quality of the environmental impact assessment process and of allowing environmental considerations to be integrated at an early stage in the project's design.
Da bi se izognili podvojevanju presoje, bi bilo treba, kjer je to ustrezno in če so dostopni, upoštevati rezultate drugih ocen na podlagi zakonodaje Unije, kot je Direktiva 2011/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [15] ali Direktiva 2009/71/Euratom, ali nacionalne zakonodaje.
Data and information included by the developer in the environmental impact assessment report, in accordance with Annex IV to Directive 2011/92/EU, should be complete and of sufficiently high quality.
Strokovnjaki, ki sodelujejo pri pripravi poročila o presoji vplivov na okolje, bi morali biti usposobljeni in za to pristojni.
With a view to avoiding duplication of assessments, the results of other assessments under Union legislation, such as Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and the Council [15] or Directive 2009/71/Euratom, or national legislation should, where relevant and available, be taken into account.
Za namen preverjanja, ki ga opravijo pristojni organi, je potrebno zadostno strokovno znanje na ustreznem področju zadevnega projekta, da bi zagotovili celovitost in visoko raven kakovosti informacij, ki jih predloži nosilec projekta.
Experts involved in the preparation of environmental impact assessment reports should be qualified and competent.
Da se zagotovita preglednost in odgovornost, bi bilo od pristojnega organa treba zahtevati, naj utemelji svojo odločitev, da za določeni projekt podeli soglasje za izvedbo, pri čemer navede, da je upošteval rezultate opravljenih posvetovanj in zbranih relevantnih informacij.
Sufficient expertise, in the relevant field of the project concerned, is required for the purpose of its examination by the competent authorities in order to ensure that the information provided by the developer is complete and of a high level of quality.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti izvajanje blažilnih in kompenzacijskih ukrepov ter določitev ustreznih postopkov v zvezi s spremljanjem pomembnih negativnih vplivov na okolje, ki izhajajo iz gradnje in obratovanja projekta, med drugim zaradi ugotavljanja nepredvidenih pomembnih negativnih vplivov in izvajanja ustreznih popravnih ukrepov.
With a view to ensuring transparency and accountability, the competent authority should be required to substantiate its decision to grant development consent in respect of a project, indicating that it has taken into consideration the results of the consultations carried out and the relevant information gathered.
Tovrstno spremljanje ne bi smelo podvajati ali povečati obsega spremljanja, ki se zahteva na podlagi zakonodaje Unije, razen te direktive in nacionalne zakonodaje.
Member States should ensure that mitigation and compensation measures are implemented, and that appropriate procedures are determined regarding the monitoring of significant adverse effects on the environment resulting from the construction and operation of a project, inter alia, to identify unforeseen significant adverse effects, in order to be able to undertake appropriate remedial action.
Da se spodbudi učinkovitejše odločanje in poveča pravna varnost, bi države članice morale zagotoviti, da se različne faze presoje vplivov na okolje projektov izvedejo v razumnem času glede na naravo, kompleksnost, lokacijo in obseg projekta.
Such monitoring should not duplicate or add to monitoring required pursuant to Union legislation other than this Directive and to national legislation.
Taki časovni okviri v nobenem primeru ne bi smeli ogrožati doseganja visokih standardov za varstvo okolja, zlasti tistih, ki izvirajo iz okoljske zakonodaje Unije, razen te direktive, ter učinkovitega sodelovanja javnosti in dostopa do pravnega varstva.
In order to stimulate more efficient decision-making and increase legal certainty, Member States should ensure that the various steps of the environmental impact assessment of projects are carried out within a reasonable period of time, depending on the nature, complexity, location and size of the project.
Kadar obveznost opravljanja presoj v zvezi z okoljem izhaja hkrati iz te direktive in Direktive 92/43/EGS in/ali Direktive 2009/147/ES, bi države članice morale zagotoviti usklajene in/ali skupne postopke za izpolnjevanje zahtev navedenih direktiv Unije, ko je to ustrezno in ob upoštevanju njihovih posebnih organizacijskih značilnosti, da bi izboljšali učinkovitost presoje, zmanjšali administrativno kompleksnost in izboljšali gospodarsko učinkovitost.
Such time-frames should, under no circumstances, compromise the achievement of high standards for the protection of the environment, particularly those resulting from Union legislation on the environment other than this Directive, and effective public participation and access to justice.
Kadar obveznost opravljanja presoj v zvezi z okoljem izhaja hkrati iz te direktive in druge zakonodaje Unije, kot so Direktiva 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [16], Direktiva 2001/42/ES, Direktiva 2008/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [17], Direktiva 2010/75/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [18] in Direktiva 2012/18/EU, bi moralo biti možno, da države članice zagotovijo usklajene in/ali skupne postopke za izpolnjevanje zahtev zadevne zakonodaje Unije.
In order to improve the effectiveness of the assessments, reduce administrative complexity and increase economic efficiency, where the obligation to carry out assessments related to environmental issues arises simultaneously from this Directive and Directive 92/43/EEC and/or Directive 2009/147/EC, Member States should ensure that coordinated and/or joint procedures fulfilling the requirements of these Directives are provided, where appropriate and taking into account their specific organisational characteristics.
Kadar se vzpostavijo usklajeni ali skupni postopki, bi morale države članice določiti organ, odgovoren za izvajanje s tem povezanih nalog.
Where the obligation to carry out assessments related to environmental issues arises simultaneously from this Directive and from other Union legislation, such as Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [16], Directive 2001/42/EC, Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [17], Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [18] and Directive 2012/18/EU, Member States should be able to provide for coordinated and/or joint procedures fulfilling the requirements of the relevant Union legislation.
Glede na institucionalne strukture bi moralo biti možno, da države članice, če bi se jim to zdelo potrebno, določijo več organov.
Where coordinated or joint procedures are set up, Member States should designate an authority responsible for performing the corresponding duties.
Države članice bi morale določiti pravila o kaznih, ki se uporabljajo za kršitve nacionalnih določb, sprejetih v skladu s to direktivo.
Taking into account institutional structures, Member States should be able to, where they deem it necessary, designate more than one authority.
Države članice lahko same izberejo vrsto ali obliko kazni.
Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive.
Te kazni bi morale biti učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne.
Member States should be free to decide the kind or form of those penalties.
V skladu z načeloma pravne varnosti in sorazmernosti je primerno določiti prehodne ukrepe, da bi zagotovili čim bolj nemoten prehod z obstoječe ureditve, določene v Direktivi 2011/92/EU, na novo ureditev, določeno v tej direktivi.
The penalties thus provided for should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Ti ukrepi bi morali zagotoviti, da se regulativno okolje v zvezi s presojo vplivov na okolje za posameznega nosilca projekta ne spremeni, če je bil v skladu z obstoječo ureditvijo že sprožen postopek na kateri koli ravni in za projekt še ni bilo izdano soglasje za izvedbo ali drug zavezujoč sklep, potreben za doseganje ciljev te direktive.
In accordance with the principles of legal certainty and proportionality and in order to ensure that the transition from the existing regime, laid down in Directive 2011/92/EU, to the new regime that will result from the amendments contained in this Directive is as smooth as possible, it is appropriate to lay down transitional measures.
S tem povezane določbe Direktive 2011/92/EU, pred spremembami, uvedenimi s to direktivo, bi se morale uporabljati za projekte, za katere je bil sprožen postopek predhodnega preverjanja ali postopek določanja obsega (če je postopek določanja obsega zahteval nosilec projekta ali pristojni organ), ali če je bilo poročilo o presoji vplivov na okolje vloženo pred rokom za prenos zakonodaje.
Those measures should ensure that the regulatory environment in relation to an environmental impact assessment is not altered, with regard to a particular developer, where any procedural steps have already been initiated under the existing regime and a development consent or another binding decision required in order to comply with the aims of this Directive has not yet been granted to the project.
Države članice so se v skladu s skupno politično izjavo držav članic in Komisije o obrazložitvenih dokumentih [19] z dne 28. septembra 2011 zavezale, da bodo v upravičenih primerih k obvestilu o svojih ukrepih za prenos priložile enega ali več dokumentov, ki bodo pojasnjevali razmerje med sestavnimi deli direktive in ustreznimi deli nacionalnih instrumentov za prenos.
Accordingly, the related provisions of Directive 2011/92/EU prior to its amendment by this Directive should apply to projects for which the screening procedure has been initiated, the scoping procedure has been initiated, (where scoping was requested by the developer or required by the competent authority) or the environmental impact assessment report is submitted before the time-limit for transposition.
Zakonodajalec meni, da je predložitev takšnih dokumentov v primeru te direktive upravičena.
In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of Member States and the Commission of 28 September 2011 on explanatory documents [19], Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer zagotoviti visoko raven varstva okolja in zdravja ljudi, z oblikovanjem minimalnih zahtev za presojo vplivov projektov na okolje, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči, temveč se ta cilj zaradi obsega, resnosti in čezmejne narave okoljskih vprašanj, ki jih je treba obravnavati, lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
With regard to this Directive, the legislator considers the transmission of such documents to be justified.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje navedenega cilja.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to ensure a high level of protection of the environment and of human health, through the establishment of minimum requirements for the environmental impact assessment of projects, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States but can rather, by reason of the scope, seriousness and transboundary nature of the environmental issues to be addressed, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Direktivo 2011/92/EU bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Directive 2011/92/EU should therefore be amended accordingly,
Člen 1
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Direktiva 2011/92/EU se spremeni:
Article 1
člen 1 se spremeni:
Directive 2011/92/EU is amended as follows:
v odstavku 2 se doda naslednja opredelitev:
Article 1 is amended as follows:
‚presoja vplivov na okolje‘ pomeni postopek, ki vključuje:
in paragraph 2, the following definition is added:
pripravo poročila o presoji vplivov na okolje, ki ga pripravi nosilec projekta v skladu s členom 5(1) in (2);
“environmental impact assessment” means a process consisting of:
izvedbo posvetovanj iz člena 6 in, kjer je ustrezno, člena 7;
the preparation of an environmental impact assessment report by the developer, as referred to in Article 5(1) and (2);
preučitev informacij v poročilu o presoji vplivov na okolje in morebitnih dodatnih informacij, ki jih po potrebi predloži nosilec projekta v skladu s členom 5(3), ter morebitnih pomembnih informacij, pridobljenih v okviru posvetovanj v skladu s členoma 6 in 7, ki jo opravi pristojni organ;
the carrying out of consultations as referred to in Article 6 and, where relevant, Article 7;
obrazloženi sklep ustreznega organa o pomembnih vplivih projekta na okolje ob upoštevanju rezultatov preučitve iz točke (iii) in, kjer je to ustrezno, njegove dopolnilne preučitve; in
the examination by the competent authority of the information presented in the environmental impact assessment report and any supplementary information provided, where necessary, by the developer in accordance with Article 5(3), and any relevant information received through the consultations under Articles 6 and 7;
vključitev obrazloženega sklepa pristojnega organa v katero koli izmed odločitev iz člena 8a.“;
the reasoned conclusion by the competent authority on the significant effects of the project on the environment, taking into account the results of the examination referred to in point (iii) and, where appropriate, its own supplementary examination; and
odstavek 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
the integration of the competent authority's reasoned conclusion into any of the decisions referred to in Article 8a.’;
Če je tako določeno v nacionalnem pravu, se države članice lahko odločajo za vsak primer posebej, da se ta direktiva ne uporablja za projekte ali dele projektov, katerih edini namen je obramba, ali projekte, katerih edini namen je odziv na civilne nesreče, če ocenijo, da bi takšna uporaba škodljivo vplivala na navedene namene.“;
paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:
odstavek 4 se črta;
Member States may decide, on a case-by-case basis and if so provided under national law, not to apply this Directive to projects, or parts of projects, having defence as their sole purpose, or to projects having the response to civil emergencies as their sole purpose, if they deem that such application would have an adverse effect on those purposes.’;
člen 2 se spremeni:
paragraph 4 is deleted;
odstavki 1 do 3 se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
Article 2 is amended as follows:
Države članice sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da so pred izdajo soglasja za izvedbo projekti, ki bodo verjetno pomembno vplivali na okolje, med drugim zaradi svoje narave, velikosti ali lokacije, predmet zahteve za izdajo soglasja za izvedbo in presojo njihovih vplivov na okolje.
paragraphs 1 to 3 are replaced by the following:
Navedeni projekti so opredeljeni v členu 4.
Member States shall adopt all measures necessary to ensure that, before development consent is given, projects likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue, inter alia, of their nature, size or location are made subject to a requirement for development consent and an assessment with regard to their effects on the environment.
Presojo vplivov na okolje se lahko vključi v obstoječe postopke za izdajo soglasja za izvedbo projektom v državah članicah, oziroma, če to ne gre, v druge postopke ali v postopke, ki jih je treba uvesti za usklajenost s cilji te direktive.
Those projects are defined in Article 4.
V primeru projektov, za katere obveznost izvajanja presoj vplivov na okolje hkrati izhaja že iz te direktive in Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS in/ali Direktive 2009/147/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta, države članice zagotovijo, kjer je to ustrezno, usklajene in/ali skupne postopke, ki izpolnjujejo zahteve iz navedene zakonodaje Unije.
The environmental impact assessment may be integrated into the existing procedures for development consent to projects in the Member States, or, failing this, into other procedures or into procedures to be established to comply with the aims of this Directive.
V primeru projektov, pri katerih obveznost izvajanja presoje vplivov na okolje izhaja hkrati iz te direktive in zakonodaje Unije, razen direktiv iz prvega pododstavka, lahko države članice zagotovijo usklajene in/ali skupne postopke.
In the case of projects for which the obligation to carry out assessments of the effects on the environment arises simultaneously from this Directive and from Council Directive 92/43/EEC and/or Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and the Council, Member States shall, where appropriate, ensure that coordinated and/or joint procedures fulfilling the requirements of that Union legislation are provided for.
V okviru usklajenega postopka iz prvega in drugega pododstavka, si države članice prizadevajo uskladiti različne posamezne presoje vplivov na okolje v zvezi s posameznim projektom, ki jih zahteva ustrezna zakonodaja Unije, in sicer tako, da za to določijo organ, brez poseganja v kakršne koli določbe, ki so v nasprotju s tem iz druge ustrezne zakonodaje Unije.
In the case of projects for which the obligation to carry out assessments of the effects on the environment arises simultaneously from this Directive and Union legislation other than the Directives listed in the first subparagraph, Member States may provide for coordinated and/or joint procedures.
V okviru skupnega postopka iz prvega in drugega pododstavka, si države članice prizadevajo zagotoviti enotno presojo vplivov na okolje v zvezi s posameznim projektom, ki jo zahteva ustrezna zakonodaja Unije, brez poseganja v kakršne koli določbe, ki so v nasprotju s tem iz druge ustrezne zakonodaje Unije.
Under the coordinated procedure referred to in the first and second subparagraphs, Member States shall endeavour to coordinate the various individual assessments of the environmental impact of a particular project, required by the relevant Union legislation, by designating an authority for this purpose, without prejudice to any provisions to the contrary contained in other relevant Union legislation.
Komisija zagotovi smernice v zvezi z vzpostavitvijo vseh usklajenih ali skupnih postopkov za projekte, za katere hkrati velja obveznost izvajanja presoj v skladu s to direktivo in direktivami 92/43/EGS, 2000/60/ES, 2009/147/ES ali 2010/75/EU.
Under the joint procedure referred to in the first and second subparagraphs, Member States shall endeavour to provide for a single assessment of the environmental impact of a particular project required by the relevant Union legislation, without prejudice to any provisions to the contrary contained in other relevant Union legislation.
v odstavku 4 se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
The Commission shall provide guidance regarding the setting up of any coordinated or joint procedures for projects that are simultaneously subject to assessments under this Directive and Directives 92/43/EEC, 2000/60/EC, 2009/147/EC or 2010/75/EU.
Brez poseganja v člen 7 lahko države članice v izjemnih primerih posamezen projekt izvzamejo iz določb te direktive, če bi njihova uporaba negativno vplivala na namen projekta, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjeni cilji te direktive.“;
in paragraph 4, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
doda se naslednji odstavek:
Without prejudice to Article 7, Member States may, in exceptional cases, exempt a specific project from the provisions laid down in this Directive, where the application of those provisions would result in adversely affecting the purpose of the project, provided the objectives of this Directive are met.’;
Kadar je projekt sprejet s posebnim aktom nacionalne zakonodaje, lahko države članice brez poseganja v člen 7 ta projekt izvzamejo iz določb v zvezi z javnim posvetovanjem, določenim v tej direktivi, če so izpolnjeni cilji te direktive.
the following paragraph is added:
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo o vsakem izvzetju iz prvega pododstavka vsaki dve leti od 16. maja 2017.“;
Without prejudice to Article 7, in cases where a project is adopted by a specific act of national legislation, Member States may exempt that project from the provisions relating to public consultation laid down in this Directive, provided the objectives of this Directive are met.
člen 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Member States shall inform the Commission of any application of the exemption referred to in the first subparagraph every two years from 16 May 2017.’;
„Člen 3
Article 3 is replaced by the following:
Presoja vplivov na okolje na primeren način glede na vsak posamezni primer opredeli, opiše in presodi neposredne in posredne pomembne vplive projekta na naslednje dejavnike:
‘Article 3
prebivalstvo in zdravje ljudi;
The environmental impact assessment shall identify, describe and assess in an appropriate manner, in the light of each individual case, the direct and indirect significant effects of a project on the following factors:
biotsko raznovrstnost, s posebnim poudarkom na vrste in habitate, ki so zavarovani v skladu z Direktivo 92/43/EGS in Direktivo 2009/147/ES;
population and human health;
zemljišče, tla, vodo, zrak in podnebje;
biodiversity, with particular attention to species and habitats protected under Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC;
materialne dobrine, kulturno dediščino in krajino;
land, soil, water, air and climate;
medsebojno delovanje dejavnikov iz točk (a) do (d).
material assets, cultural heritage and the landscape;
Vplivi iz odstavka 1 na dejavnike iz navedenega odstavka vključujejo pričakovane vplive, ki izhajajo iz ranljivosti projekta na tveganje hudih nesreč in/ali katastrof, ki so relevantne za zadevni projekt.“;
the interaction between the factors referred to in points (a) to (d).
člen 4 se spremeni:
The effects referred to in paragraph 1 on the factors set out therein shall include the expected effects deriving from the vulnerability of the project to risks of major accidents and/or disasters that are relevant to the project concerned.’;
odstavka 3 in 4 se nadomestita z naslednjim:
Article 4 is amended as follows:
Med preverjanjem za vsak primer posebej ali postavljanjem pragov ali meril za namen odstavka 2 se upoštevajo ustrezna izbirna merila, določena v Prilogi III.
paragraphs 3 and 4 are replaced by the following:
Države članice lahko postavijo pragove ali merila, s katerimi določijo, v katerih primerih za projekte nista potrebni odločitev iz odstavkov 4 in 5 in presoja vplivov na okolje, in/ali pragove ali merila, s katerimi določijo, v katerih primerih je za projekte vedno potrebna presoja vplivov na okolje, vendar zanje ni potreba odločitev iz odstavkov 4 in 5.
Where a case-by-case examination is carried out or thresholds or criteria are set for the purpose of paragraph 2, the relevant selection criteria set out in Annex III shall be taken into account.
Kadar države članice sklenejo, da je za projekte, naštete v Prilogi II, potrebna odločitev, nosilec projekta priskrbi informacije o značilnostih projekta in njegovih verjetnih pomembnih vplivih na okolje.
Member States may set thresholds or criteria to determine when projects need not undergo either the determination under paragraphs 4 and 5 or an environmental impact assessment, and/or thresholds or criteria to determine when projects shall in any case be made subject to an environmental impact assessment without undergoing a determination set out under paragraphs 4 and 5.
Nosilec projekta lahko tudi zagotovi opis vseh značilnosti projekta in/ali ukrepov, predvidenih za izogibanje ali preprečevanje pomembnih negativnih vplivov na okolje.“;