natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
amending Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the information requirements for authorisation of biocidal products
o spremembi Priloge III k Uredbi (EU) št. 528/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede zahtev po informacijah za izdajo dovoljenja za biocidne proizvode
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products [1], and in particular Article 85 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 528/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2012 o dostopnosti na trgu in uporabi biocidnih proizvodov [1], zlasti člena 85 Uredbe,
Pursuant to Article 19(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 a biocidal product may be authorised if the active substances in the product have been approved in accordance with Article 9 of that Regulation.
V skladu s členom 19(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012 se za biocidni proizvod lahko izda dovoljenje, če so bile aktivne snovi v proizvodu odobrene v skladu s členom 9 navedene uredbe.
A biocidal product may be authorised even if one or more of the active substances contained therein has been manufactured in a different location or according to a different process, including from different starting materials, than those of the substance evaluated for approval pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Za biocidni proizvod se lahko izda dovoljenje tudi če je bila ena ali več aktivnih snovi proizvedenih na drugačnem mestu ali v drugačnem postopku, vključno iz drugačnih vhodnih sestavin od tistih, ki se uporabljajo za snov, ki je bila ocenjena za odobritev v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012.
In such cases, for the purpose of ensuring that the active substance contained in a biocidal product does not have significantly more hazardous properties than the substance which has been evaluated for the purpose of approval, it is necessary to establish technical equivalence pursuant to Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012.
Da se v takih primerih zagotovi, da aktivna snov iz biocidnega proizvoda nima občutno več nevarnih lastnosti kot snov, ki je bila ocenjena za odobritev, je treba ugotoviti tehnično ekvivalenco v skladu s členom 54 Uredbe (EU) št. 528/2012.
It is therefore appropriate to include proof of establishment of technical equivalence in the information requirements for authorisation of biocidal products listed in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012,
Zato je primerno dokaz o ugotovitvi tehnične ekvivalence vključiti v zahteve po informacijah za izdajo dovoljenja za biocidne proizvode iz Priloge III k Uredbi (EU) št. 528/2012 –
Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 is amended as follows:
Priloga III k Uredbi (EU) št. 528/2012 se spremeni:
In the table in title 1, the following entry 2.5 is inserted:
V tabelo iz naslova 1 se doda naslednji vnos 2.5: „2.5
"2.5 Where the biocidal product contains an active substance that has been manufactured in locations or according to processes or from starting materials other than those of the active substance evaluated for the purpose of approval pursuant to Article 9 of this Regulation, evidence has to be provided that technical equivalence has been established in accordance with Article 54 of this Regulation or has been established, following an evaluation having started before 1 September 2013, by a competent authority designated in accordance with Article 26 of Directive 98/8/EC."
Če biocidni proizvod vsebuje aktivno snov, ki je bila proizvedena na mestih, v skladu s postopki ali iz vhodnih sestavin, ki so drugačne od tistih za aktivno snov, ocenjeno za namen odobritve v skladu s členom 9 te uredbe, je treba zagotoviti dokaz, da je pristojni organ, imenovan v skladu s členom 26 Direktive 98/8/ES, ugotovil tehnično ekvivalenco v skladu s členom 54 te uredbe ali z oceno, katere priprava se je začela pred 1. septembrom 2013.“
In the table in title 2, the following entry 2.5 is inserted:
V tabelo iz naslova 2 se doda naslednji vnos 2.5: „2.5
OJ L 167, 27.6.2012, p. 1.
UL L 167, 27.6.2012, str.1.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 838/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 838/2013
OJ L 23, 25.01.2013, p. 54.
UL L 23, 25.1.2013, str. 54.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 839/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 839/2013
Commission Regulation (EU) No 840/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 840/2013
establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in EU and international waters of V; international waters of XII and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Latvia
o prepovedi ribolova na rdečega okuna v vodah EU in mednarodnih vodah območja V ter mednarodnih vodah območij XII in XIV s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Latvije
Redfish (deep pelagic) (Sebastes spp.)
rdeči okun (globoki pelagični) (Sebastes spp.)
EU and international waters of V; international waters of XII and XIV
vode EU in mednarodne vode območja V ter mednarodne vode območij XII in XIV
Commission Regulation (EU) No 841/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 841/2013
establishing a prohibition of fishing for sandeel and associated by-catches in EU waters of IIa, IIIa and IV and EU waters of sandeel management areas 1, 2, 3 and 4 excluding waters within six nautical miles of UK baselines at Shetland, Fair Isle and Foula, by vessels flying the flag of Germany
o prepovedi ribolova na pravo peščenko in z njo povezanega prilova v vodah EU območij IIa, IIIa in IV ter vodah EU območij upravljanja prave peščenke 1, 2, 3 in 4, brez voda znotraj šestih morskih milj od temeljnih črt Združenega kraljestva pri Šetlandskih otokih, otokih Fair in Foula, s plovili, ki pljujejo pod zastavo Nemčije
SAN/2A3A4. and management areas SAN/234_1, _2, _3, _4
območje SAN/2A3A4. in območja upravljanja SAN/234_1, _2, _3, _4
EU waters of IIa, IIIa and IV and EU waters of sandeel management areas 1, 2, 3 and 4
vode EU območij IIa, IIIa in IV ter vode EU območij upravljanja prave peščenke 1, 2, 3 in 4
Commission Regulation (EU) No 842/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 842/2013
establishing a prohibition of fishing for mackerel in areas VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1 by vessels flying the flag of Germany
o prepovedi ribolova na skušo v območjih VIIIc, IX in X ter vodah EU območja CECAF 34.1.1 s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Nemčije
VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1
območja VIIIc, IX in X ter vode EU območja CECAF 34.1.1
Commission Regulation (EU) No 843/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 843/2013
establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of V and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Latvia
o prepovedi ribolova na rdečega okuna v grenlandskih vodah območja NAFO 1F ter grenlandskih vodah območij V in XIV s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Latvije
Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of V and XIV
grenlandske vode območja NAFO 1F ter grenlandske vode območij V in XIV
Commission Regulation (EU) No 844/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 844/2013
establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of V and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Germany
o prepovedi ribolova na rdečega okuna v grenlandskih vodah območja NAFO 1F ter grenlandskih vodah območij V in XIV s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Nemčije
Commission Regulation (EU) No 845/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 845/2013
establishing a prohibition of fishing for mackerel in areas VIIIa, VIIIb and VIIId by vessels flying the flag of Germany
o prepovedi ribolova na skušo v območjih VIIIa, VIIIb and VIIId s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Nemčije
VIIIa, VIIIb and VIIId
območja VIIIa, VIIIb in VIIId
Commission Regulation (EU) No 846/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 846/2013
establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in Union waters of Subdivisions 25-27, 28.2, 29 and 32 by vessels flying the flag of Germany
o prepovedi ribolova na atlantski sled v vodah Unije podrazdelkov 25–27, 28.2, 29 in 32 s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Nemčije
Union waters of Subdivisions 25-27, 28.2, 29 and 32
vode Unije podrazdelkov 25–27, 28.2, 29 in 32
Commission Regulation (EU) No 847/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 847/2013
establishing a prohibition of fishing for cod in areas I and IIb by vessels flying the flag of a Member State of the European Union except Germany, Spain, France, Poland and United Kingdom
o prepovedi ribolova na trsko v območjih I in IIb s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo države članice Evropske unije, razen Nemčije, Španije, Francije, Poljske in Združenega kraljestva
ALL MEMBER STATES except Germany, Spain, France, Poland and United Kingdom
VSE DRŽAVE ČLANICE razen Nemčije, Španije, Francije, Poljske in Združenega kraljestva
I and IIb
območji I in IIb
Commission Regulation (EU) No 848/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 848/2013
establishing a prohibition of fishing for sandeel and associated by-catches in sandeel management area 2 by vessels flying the flag of Denmark
o prepovedi ribolova na pravo peščenko in z njo povezanega prilova v območju upravljanja prave peščenke 2 s plovili, ki plujejo pod zastavo Danske
Sandeel management area 2
območje upravljanja prave peščenke 2
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 849/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 849/2013
of 2 September 2013
z dne 2. septembra 2013
Done at Brussels, 2 September 2013.
V Bruslju, 2. septembra 2013
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 850/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 850/2013
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pastel de Tentúgal (PGI))
o vpisu imena v register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Pastel de Tentúgal (ZGO))
Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Pastel de Tentúgal’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
V skladu s členom 6(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 je bila vloga Portugalske za registracijo imena „Pastel de Tentúgal“ objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pastel de Tentúgal’ should therefore be entered in the register,
Ker v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006 Komisija ni prejela nobene izjave o ugovoru, bi bilo treba ime „Pastel de Tentúgal“ registrirati –
OJ C 302, 6.10.2012, p. 31.
UL C 302, 6.10.2012, str. 31.
Foodstuffs listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012:
Živila iz Priloge I k Uredbi (EU) št. 1151/2012:
Pastel de Tentúgal (PGI)
Pastel de Tentúgal (ZGO)
Commission Regulation (EU) No 851/2013
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 851/2013
of 3 September 2013
z dne 3. septembra 2013
authorising certain health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health and amending Regulation (EU) No 432/2012
o odobritvi nekaterih zdravstvenih trditev na živilih, razen tistih, ki se nanašajo na zmanjšanje tveganja za nastanek bolezni ter na razvoj in zdravje otrok, in o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 432/2012
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods [1], and in particular Article 18(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditvah na živilih [1] in zlasti člena 18(4) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 provides that health claims made on food are prohibited unless they are authorised by the Commission in accordance with that Regulation and included in a list of permitted claims.
Uredba (ES) št. 1924/2006 določa, da so zdravstvene trditve na živilih prepovedane, razen če jih Komisija v skladu z navedeno uredbo odobri in uvrsti na seznam dovoljenih trditev.
Pursuant to Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012 [2] was adopted, which established a list of permitted health claims made on foods other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health.
V skladu s členom 13(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 je Komisija sprejela Uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 432/2012 [2] o seznamu dovoljenih zdravstvenih trditev na živilih, razen trditev, ki se nanašajo na zmanjšanje tveganja za nastanek bolezni ter na razvoj in zdravje otrok.
Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 also provides that applications for authorisations of health claims are to be submitted by food business operators to the national competent authority of a Member State.
Uredba (ES) št. 1924/2006 določa tudi, da morajo nosilci živilske dejavnosti vloge za odobritev zdravstvenih trditev vložiti pri pristojnem nacionalnem organu države članice.
The national competent authority is to forward valid applications to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), hereinafter referred to as ‘the Authority’, for a scientific assessment, as well as to the Commission and the Member States for information.
Nacionalni pristojni organ mora veljavne vloge posredovati Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane (EFSA, v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) v znanstveno oceno ter Komisiji in državam članicam v vednost.
Following an application from GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited, submitted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Authority was required to deliver an opinion on a health claim related to the effects of a reformulated acidic non-alcoholic drink on reduction of tooth demineralisation (Question No EFSA-Q-2010-00784) [3].
Družba GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited je v skladu s členom 13(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 vložila vlogo, Agencija pa je morala pripraviti mnenje o zdravstveni trditvi v zvezi z učinki reformuliranih kislih nealkoholnih pijač na zmanjšanje demineralizacije zob (vprašanje št. EFSA-Q-2010-00784) [3].
The claim proposed by the applicant was worded as follows: ‘ “Toothkind” drinks help to maintain healthy teeth’.
Vlagatelj je predlagal naslednjo trditev: Pijače „‚Toothkind‘ prispevajo k ohranjanju zdravih zob“.
On 16 December 2010, the Commission and the Member States received the scientific opinion from the Authority which concluded that on the basis of the data presented, a cause and effect relationship had been established between the consumption of typical conventional juice drinks at an exposure frequency of four times per day and of typical sugar-containing beverages (8-12 g sugars/100 ml) at an exposure frequency of seven times per day and tooth demineralisation.
Komisija in države članice so 16. decembra 2010 od Agencije prejele znanstveno mnenje, ki je na podlagi predloženih podatkov ugotovila, da obstaja vzročno-posledična povezava med uživanjem tipičnih konvencionalnih sokov pri izpostavljenosti štirikrat na dan in tipičnih pijač, ki vsebujejo sladkor (8–12 g sladkorjev/100 ml), pri izpostavljenosti sedemkrat na dan in demineralizacijo zob.
Furthermore, it concluded that replacement of those beverages with ‘toothkind’ drinks may contribute to reduced tooth demineralisation.
Poleg tega je ugotovila, da nadomestitev navedenih pijač s pijačami „toothkind“ lahko prispeva k zmanjšanju demineralizacije zob.
Following consultation with the Member States, the Commission requested additional advice from the Authority, inter alia, on whether the beneficial effect is shown or expected to be shown for less frequent consumers of conventional juice drinks and typical sugar-containing non-alcoholic beverages.
Po posvetovanju z državami članicami je Komisija Agencijo zaprosila za dodatne nasvete, med drugim o tem, ali je koristni učinek viden oziroma se pričakuje, da bo viden tudi pri potrošnikih, ki manj pogosto pijejo konvencionalne sokove in tipične brezalkoholnih pijače, ki vsebujejo sladkor.
The Authority in its opinion of 8 July 2011 (Question No EFSA-Q-2011-00781) [4] concluded that a beneficial effect on maintaining tooth mineralisation may be expected for people who consume conventional juice drinks or sugar-containing non-alcoholic beverages and who are also frequent consumers of sugars and/or acids from other beverages or foods that can contribute to tooth demineralisation, if one or more servings of conventional juice drinks or sugar-containing non-alcoholic beverages are substituted by an equivalent number of servings of ‘toothkind’ juice drink.
Agencija je v mnenju z dne 8. julija 2011 (vprašanje št. EFSA-Q-2011-00781) [4] sklenila, da je pozitiven učinek na ohranjanje mineralizacije zob mogoče pričakovati za ljudi, ki uživajo konvencionalne sokove ali brezalkoholne pijače, ki vsebujejo sladkor, in ki pogosto uživajo tudi sladkorje in/ali kisline iz drugih pijač ali živil, ki lahko prispevajo k demineralizacije zob, če enega ali več obrokov konvencionalnih sokov ali brezalkoholnih pijač, ki vsebujejo sladkor, nadomestijo z enakim število obrokov soka „toothkind“.
Furthermore, it was clarified that ‘reduction of tooth demineralisation’ has a similar meaning to ‘maintenance of tooth mineralisation’.
Poleg tega je pojasnila, da ima „zmanjšanje demineralizacije zob“ podoben pomen kot „ohranjanje mineralizacije zob“.
Accordingly, a health claim reflecting this conclusion and accompanied by specific conditions of use should be considered as complying with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, and it should be included in the Union list of permitted claims, established by Regulation (EU) No 432/2012.
Zdravstveno trditev, ki odraža ta sklep, in spremljajoče pogoje uporabe bi zato bilo treba šteti za skladne z zahtevami iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 in jih uvrstiti na seznam dovoljenih trditev Unije, uveden z Uredbo (EU) št. 432/2012.
The Authority indicated in its opinion that its conclusions could not have been reached without considering 15 studies claimed by the applicant as proprietary.
Agencija je v svojem mnenju navedla, da do ugotovitev ne bi prišla brez upoštevanja petnajstih študij, za katere je vlagatelj zahteval zakonsko zaščito podatkov.
Those studies are the following:
Te študije so:
All the justifiable information provided by the applicant has been assessed by the Commission and it is considered that the requirements laid down in Article 21(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 are fulfilled for all 15 studies claimed as proprietary.
Komisija je ocenila vse upravičljive informacije, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj, in sklenila, da so zahteve iz člena 21(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 izpolnjene za vseh petnajst študij, za katere je vlagatelj zahteval zakonsko zaščito podatkov.
By letter dated 12 June 2013, the applicant informed the Commission that there have been some changes to the structure and location of its business.
Vlagatelj je dne 12. junija 2013 pisno obvestil Komisijo, da se je spremenila struktura podjetja in kraj opravljanja dejavnosti.
Therefore, the applicant formally requested that protection of proprietary data is granted to GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited and its affiliates, GSK House, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, TW89GS, United Kingdom
Zato je vlagatelj uradno zahteval, da se zakonska zaščita podatkov dodeli podjetju GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited in njegovim podružnicam, GSK House, 980 Great West Road, Brentford, TW89GS, Združeno kraljestvo
Accordingly, the scientific data and other information included in those studies may not be used for the benefit of a subsequent applicant for a period of five years from the date of authorisation, under the conditions laid down in Article 21(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006.
Znanstveni podatki in druge informacije iz navedenih študij v skladu s pogoji iz člena 21(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 se zato ne smejo uporabiti v prid poznejšega vlagatelja v petih letih od datuma izdaje dovoljenja.
Following an application from Kraft Foods Europe — Biscuits R & D submitted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Authority was required to deliver an opinion on a health claim related to the effects of slowly digestible starch (SDS) in starch-containing foods and reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses (Question No EFSA-Q-2010-00966) [5].
Družba Kraft Foods Europe - Biscuits R&D je v skladu s členom 13(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 vložila vlogo, Agencija pa je morala pripraviti mnenje o zdravstveni trditvi v zvezi z učinki počasi prebavljivega škroba v živilih, ki vsebujejo škrob, in zmanjšanju post-prandialnega glikemičnega odziva (vprašanje št. EFSA-Q-2010-00966) [5].
The claim proposed by the applicant was worded as follows: ‘Slowly digestible starch provides carbohydrates that are regularly and continuously absorbed and released. They contribute to a moderate post-prandial glycaemic response’.
Vlagatelj je predlagal naslednjo trditev: „Počasi prebavljivi škrob vsebuje ogljikove hidrate, ki se redno in stalno absorbirajo in sproščajo. Prispevajo k zmernemu post-prandialnemu glikemičnemu odzivu.“
On 21 July 2011, the Commission and the Member States received the scientific opinion from the Authority which concluded that on the basis of the data presented, a cause and effect relationship had been established between the consumption of SDS, as compared to the consumption of rapidly digestible starch (RDS), in cereal products and reduced post-prandial glycaemic responses.
Komisija in države članice so 21. julija 2011 prejele znanstveno mnenje Agencije, ki je na podlagi predloženih podatkov ugotovila, da obstaja vzročno-posledična povezava med uživanjem počasi prebavljivega škroba v primerjavi s hitro prebavljivim škrobom v žitnih proizvodih ter da počasi prebavljivi škrob zmanjšuje post-prandialni glikemični odziv.
Accordingly, a health claim reflecting this conclusion should be considered as complying with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 and should be included in the Union list of permitted claims, established by Regulation (EU) No 432/2012.
Zdravstveno trditev, ki odraža ta sklep, bi zato bilo treba šteti za skladno z zahtevami iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 in jo uvrstiti na seznam dovoljenih trditev Unije, uveden z Uredbo (EU) št. 432/2012.
The Authority indicated in its opinion that the four studies claimed as proprietary by the applicant were required to establish conditions of use for this specific claim.
Agencija je v svojem mnenju navedla, da do ugotovitev ne bi prišla brez upoštevanja štirih študij, za katere je vlagatelj zahteval zakonsko zaščito podatkov.
All the justifiable information provided by the applicant has been assessed by the Commission and it is considered that the requirements laid down in Article 21(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 are fulfilled for the studies claimed as proprietary.
Komisija je ocenila vse upravičljive informacije, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj, in sklenila, da so zahteve iz člena 21(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 izpolnjene za študije, za katere je vlagatelj zahteval zakonsko zaščito podatkov.
By letter dated 1 October 2012, the applicant informed the Commission about the restructuring process, by means of which the Kraft Foods group span off its business, thereby creating two fully independent groups, one of them being the Mondelēz International group.
Vlagatelj je 1. oktobra 2012 pisano obvestil Komisijo o prestrukturiranju, pri čemer je skupina Kraft Foods izločila svoje z ustanovitvijo dveh povsem neodvisnih skupin; ena od njih je skupina Mondelēz International.
As from 1 October 2012, Kraft Foods Europe — Biscuits R & D belongs to the Mondelēz International group, and the applicant formally requested that the protection of proprietary data is granted to the Mondelēz International group.
Podjetje Kraft Foods Europe - Biscuits R & D od 1. oktobra 2012 spada v skupino Mondelēz International, zato je vlagatelj zahteval, da se zakonska zaščita podatkov podeli skupini Mondelēz International.
Following an application from Barry Callebaut Belgium NV submitted pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the Authority was required to deliver an opinion on a health claim related to the effects of cocoa flavanols on endothelium-dependent vasodilation (Question No EFSA-Q-2012-00002) [6].
Družba Barry Callebaut Belgium NV je v skladu s členom 13(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 vložila vlogo, Agencija pa je morala pripraviti mnenje o zdravstveni trditvi v zvezi z učinki kakavovih flavanolov na širjenje žil, odvisno od endotelija (vprašanje št. EFSA-Q-2012-00002) [6].