natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘leniency programme’ means a programme concerning the application of Article 101 TFEU or a corresponding provision under national law on the basis of which a participant in a secret cartel, independently of the other undertakings involved in the cartel, cooperates with an investigation of the competition authority, by voluntarily providing presentations regarding that participant's knowledge of, and role in, the cartel in return for which that participant receives, by decision or by a discontinuation of proceedings, immunity from, or a reduction in, fines for its involvement in the cartel;
„predhodne informacije“ pomenijo dokaz, ki obstaja neodvisno od postopka organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, ne glede na to, ali spis organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, te informacije vsebuje ali ne;
‘leniency statement’ means an oral or written presentation voluntarily provided by, or on behalf of, an undertaking or a natural person to a competition authority or a record thereof, describing the knowledge of that undertaking or natural person of a cartel and describing its role therein, which presentation was drawn up specifically for submission to the competition authority with a view to obtaining immunity or a reduction of fines under a leniency programme, not including pre-existing information;
„vloga za poravnavo“ pomeni poročilo, ki ga prostovoljno predstavi podjetje ali je predstavljeno v njegovem imenu organu, pristojnem za konkurenco, v katerem prizna svoje sodelovanje pri kršitvi konkurenčnega prava in prevzame odgovornost za takšno kršitev konkurenčnega prava ali se je odreklo ugovarjanju takšnemu sodelovanju in odgovornosti, in je pripravljeno posebej za to, da bi organ, pristojen za konkurenco, lahko uporabil poenostavljeni ali hitri postopek;
‘pre-existing information’ means evidence that exists irrespective of the proceedings of a competition authority, whether or not such information is in the file of a competition authority;
„oseba z imuniteto“ pomeni podjetje ali fizično osebo, ki mu je organ, pristojen za konkurenco, priznal imuniteto pred globami v okviru programa prizanesljivosti;
‘settlement submission’ means a voluntary presentation by, or on behalf of, an undertaking to a competition authority describing the undertaking's acknowledgement of, or its renunciation to dispute, its participation in an infringement of competition law and its responsibility for that infringement of competition law, which was drawn up specifically to enable the competition authority to apply a simplified or expedited procedure;
„povečani stroški“ pomenijo razliko med dejansko plačano ceno in ceno, ki bi obveljala, če ne bi bilo kršitve konkurenčnega prava;
‘immunity recipient’ means an undertaking which, or a natural person who, has been granted immunity from fines by a competition authority under a leniency programme;
„sporazumno reševanje sporov“ pomeni vsak mehanizem, ki strankam omogoči, da dosežejo izvensodno rešitev spora v zvezi z odškodninskim zahtevkom;
‘overcharge’ means the difference between the price actually paid and the price that would otherwise have prevailed in the absence of an infringement of competition law;
„sporazumna poravnava“ pomeni sporazum, dosežen na podlagi sporazumne rešitve spora;
‘consensual dispute resolution’ means any mechanism enabling parties to reach the out-of-court resolution of a dispute concerning a claim for damages;
„neposredni kupec“ pomeni fizično ali pravno osebo, ki je neposredno od kršitelja pridobila izdelke ali storitve, ki so bile predmet kršitve konkurenčnega prava;
‘consensual settlement’ means an agreement reached through consensual dispute resolution.
„posredni kupec“ pomeni fizično ali pravno osebo, ki ni pridobila neposredno od kršitelja, temveč je pridobila od neposrednega kupca ali nadaljnjega kupca izdelke ali storitve, ki so bile predmet kršitve konkurenčnega prava, ali izdelke ali storitve, ki izhajajo iz takšnega blaga ali storitev.
‘direct purchaser’ means a natural or legal person who acquired, directly from an infringer, products or services that were the object of an infringement of competition law;
Člen 3
‘indirect purchaser’ means a natural or legal person who acquired, not directly from an infringer, but from a direct purchaser or a subsequent purchaser, products or services that were the object of an infringement of competition law, or products or services containing them or derived therefrom.
Pravica do popolne odškodnine
Article 3
Države članice zagotovijo, da fizične ali pravne osebe, ki so utrpele škodo zaradi kršitve konkurenčnega prava, lahko zahtevajo in dobijo popolno odškodnino za takšno škodo.
Right to full compensation
S popolno odškodnino se za osebo, ki je utrpela škodo, vzpostavi stanje, v katerem bi bila, če ne bi bilo kršitve konkurenčnega prava.
Member States shall ensure that any natural or legal person who has suffered harm caused by an infringement of competition law is able to claim and to obtain full compensation for that harm.
Popolna odškodnina zato zajema pravico do odškodnine za dejansko izgubo in izgubljeni dobiček skupaj s plačilom obresti.
Full compensation shall place a person who has suffered harm in the position in which that person would have been had the infringement of competition law not been committed.
Popolna odškodnina po tej direktivi ne pomeni čezmernih odškodnin, bodisi kazenskih odškodnin, večkratnih zneskov odškodnin ali drugih vrst odškodnin.
It shall therefore cover the right to compensation for actual loss and for loss of profit, plus the payment of interest.
Člen 4
Full compensation under this Directive shall not lead to overcompensation, whether by means of punitive, multiple or other types of damages.
Načelo učinkovitosti in enakovrednosti
Article 4
V skladu z načelom učinkovitosti države članice zagotovijo, da se vsa nacionalna pravila in postopki v zvezi z uveljavljanjem odškodninskih zahtevkov oblikujejo in uporabljajo tako, da v praksi ne onemogočajo ali pretirano otežujejo uveljavljanja pravice po pravu Unije do popolne odškodnine za škodo, povzročeno s kršitvijo konkurenčnega prava.
Principles of effectiveness and equivalence
V skladu z načelom enakovrednosti nacionalna pravila in postopki v zvezi z odškodninskimi tožbami zaradi kršitev člena 101 ali 102 PDEU za domnevne oškodovance niso manj ugodna kot pravila in postopki, ki urejajo podobne odškodninske tožbe zaradi kršitev nacionalnega prava.
In accordance with the principle of effectiveness, Member States shall ensure that all national rules and procedures relating to the exercise of claims for damages are designed and applied in such a way that they do not render practically impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of the Union right to full compensation for harm caused by an infringement of competition law.
POGLAVJE II
In accordance with the principle of equivalence, national rules and procedures relating to actions for damages resulting from infringements of Article 101 or 102 TFEU shall not be less favourable to the alleged injured parties than those governing similar actions for damages resulting from infringements of national law.
RAZKRITJE DOKAZOV
DISCLOSURE OF EVIDENCE
Razkritje dokazov
Article 5
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko nacionalna sodišča v postopkih v zvezi z odškodninsko tožbo v Uniji na zahtevo tožnika, ki predloži utemeljeno obrazložitev z dejstvi in dokazi, ki so dostopni pod razumnimi pogoji in zadostno podpirajo verjetnost odškodninskega zahtevka, tožencu ali tretji osebi odredijo razkritje ustreznih dokazov, s katerimi razpolagajo, v skladu s pogoji iz tega poglavja.
Disclosure of evidence
Države članice nacionalnim sodiščem zagotovijo tudi možnost, da na zahtevo toženca tožniku ali tretji osebi odredijo razkritje ustreznih dokazov.
Member States shall ensure that in proceedings relating to an action for damages in the Union, upon request of a claimant who has presented a reasoned justification containing reasonably available facts and evidence sufficient to support the plausibility of its claim for damages, national courts are able to order the defendant or a third party to disclose relevant evidence which lies in their control, subject to the conditions set out in this Chapter.
Ta odstavek ne posega v pravice in obveznosti nacionalnih sodišč iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1206/2001.
Member States shall ensure that national courts are able, upon request of the defendant, to order the claimant or a third party to disclose relevant evidence.
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko nacionalna sodišča odredijo razkritje določenih dokazov ali ustreznih dokazov, ki so v utemeljeni obrazložitvi karseda natančno in podrobno opisani na podlagi dejstev, dostopnih pod razumnimi pogoji.
This paragraph is without prejudice to the rights and obligations of national courts under Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001.
Države članice zagotovijo, da nacionalna sodišča omejijo razkritje dokazov le na tisto, kar je sorazmerno.
Member States shall ensure that national courts are able to order the disclosure of specified items of evidence or relevant categories of evidence circumscribed as precisely and as narrowly as possible on the basis of reasonably available facts in the reasoned justification.
Pri odločanju o tem, ali je razkritje, ki ga je zahtevala stranka, sorazmerno, nacionalna sodišča upoštevajo legitimni interes vseh zadevnih strank in tretjih oseb.
Member States shall ensure that national courts limit the disclosure of evidence to that which is proportionate.
Upoštevajo zlasti:
In determining whether any disclosure requested by a party is proportionate, national courts shall consider the legitimate interests of all parties and third parties concerned.
koliko je zahtevek ali ugovor podprt z razpoložljivimi dejstvi in dokazi, ki utemeljujejo zahtevo po razkritju dokazov;
They shall, in particular, consider:
obseg in stroške razkritja, zlasti za zadevne tretje osebe, vključno s preprečitvijo vsesplošnega iskanja informacij, ki po vsej verjetnosti niso pomembne za stranke postopka;
the extent to which the claim or defence is supported by available facts and evidence justifying the request to disclose evidence;
ali dokazi, katerih razkritje se zahteva, vsebujejo zaupne informacije, zlasti v zvezi s tretjimi osebami, in ali obstajajo ureditve o varovanju takšnih zaupnih informacij.
the scope and cost of disclosure, especially for any third parties concerned, including preventing non-specific searches for information which is unlikely to be of relevance for the parties in the procedure;
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo nacionalna sodišča pristojnost, da odredijo razkritje dokazov, ki vsebujejo zaupne informacije, kadar menijo, da so pomembni za odškodninsko tožbo.
whether the evidence the disclosure of which is sought contains confidential information, especially concerning any third parties, and what arrangements are in place for protecting such confidential information.
Zagotovijo tudi, da imajo nacionalna sodišča pri odreditvi razkritja takšnih informacij na voljo učinkovite ukrepe za varstvo takšnih informacij.
Member States shall ensure that national courts have the power to order the disclosure of evidence containing confidential information where they consider it relevant to the action for damages.
Interes podjetij, da se po kršitvi konkurenčnega prava izognejo odškodninskim tožbam, ne predstavlja interesa, ki bi ga bilo treba zaščititi.
Member States shall ensure that, when ordering the disclosure of such information, national courts have at their disposal effective measures to protect such information.
Države članice zagotovijo, da nacionalna sodišča pri odredbah o razkritju dokazov uveljavljajo polni učinek varovanja poklicne skrivnosti odvetnikov v skladu s pravom Unije ali nacionalnim pravom.
The interest of undertakings to avoid actions for damages following an infringement of competition law shall not constitute an interest that warrants protection.
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo osebe, od katerih se zahteva razkritje, možnost, da so zaslišane, preden nacionalno sodišče odredi razkritje v skladu s tem členom.
Member States shall ensure that national courts give full effect to applicable legal professional privilege under Union or national law when ordering the disclosure of evidence.
Brez poseganja v odstavka 4 in 7 ter v člen 6, ta člen državam članicam ne preprečuje, da ohranijo ali uvedejo pravila, ki bi dovoljevala razkritje dokazov v širšem obsegu.
Member States shall ensure that those from whom disclosure is sought are provided with an opportunity to be heard before a national court orders disclosure under this Article.
Člen 6
Without prejudice to paragraphs 4 and 7 and to Article 6, this Article shall not prevent Member States from maintaining or introducing rules which would lead to wider disclosure of evidence.
Razkritje dokazov iz spisa organa, pristojnega za konkurenco
Article 6
Države članice zagotovijo, da se za namene odškodninskih tožb v primerih, ko nacionalna sodišča odredijo razkritje dokazov iz spisa organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, poleg člena 5 uporablja tudi ta člen.
Disclosure of evidence included in the file of a competition authority
Ta člen ne posega v pravila in prakso glede dostopa javnosti do dokumentov v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1049/2001.
Member States shall ensure that, for the purpose of actions for damages, where national courts order the disclosure of evidence included in the file of a competition authority, this Article applies in addition to Article 5.
Ta člen ne posega v pravila in prakso prava Unije ali nacionalnega prava o zaščiti notranjih dokumentov organov, pristojnih za konkurenco, in korespondence med temi organi.
This Article is without prejudice to the rules and practices on public access to documents under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.
Pri ocenjevanju sorazmernosti odredbe za razkritje informacij, v skladu s členom 5(3), nacionalna sodišča upoštevajo tudi naslednje:
This Article is without prejudice to the rules and practices under Union or national law on the protection of internal documents of competition authorities and of correspondence between competition authorities.
ali zahteva vsebuje podrobnosti o naravi, predmetu ali vsebini dokumentov, predloženih organu, pristojnemu za konkurenco, ali je del spisa takšnega organa, ali pa je bila zahteva bolj splošna zahteva v zvezi z dokumenti, predloženimi organu, pristojnemu za konkurenco;
When assessing, in accordance with Article 5(3), the proportionality of an order to disclose information, national courts shall, in addition, consider the following:
ali stranka zahteva razkritje v zvezi z odškodninsko tožbo pred nacionalnim sodiščem ter
whether the request has been formulated specifically with regard to the nature, subject matter or contents of documents submitted to a competition authority or held in the file thereof, rather than by a non-specific application concerning documents submitted to a competition authority;
v povezavi z odstavkoma 5 in 10 ali na zahtevo organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, v skladu z odstavkom 11 potrebo po varovanju učinkovitosti javnega izvrševanja konkurenčnega prava.
whether the party requesting disclosure is doing so in relation to an action for damages before a national court; and
Nacionalna sodišča lahko šele po tem, ko je organ, pristojen za konkurenco, končal postopek s sprejetjem odločbe ali drugače, odredijo razkritje naslednjih vrst dokazov:
in relation to paragraphs 5 and 10, or upon request of a competition authority pursuant to paragraph 11, the need to safeguard the effectiveness of the public enforcement of competition law.
informacij, ki jih je pripravila fizična ali pravna oseba posebej za postopek organa, pristojnega za konkurenco;
National courts may order the disclosure of the following categories of evidence only after a competition authority, by adopting a decision or otherwise, has closed its proceedings:
informacij, ki jih je med postopkom zbral organ, pristojen za konkurenco, in jih poslal strankam, in
information that was prepared by a natural or legal person specifically for the proceedings of a competition authority;
vlog za poravnavo, ki so bile umaknjene.
information that the competition authority has drawn up and sent to the parties in the course of its proceedings; and
Države članice zagotovijo, da nacionalna sodišča za namen odškodninskih tožb nikoli ne morejo odrediti, naj stranka ali tretja oseba razkrije katero koli od naslednjih vrst dokazov:
settlement submissions that have been withdrawn.
izjav zaradi prizanesljivosti in
Member States shall ensure that, for the purpose of actions for damages, national courts cannot at any time order a party or a third party to disclose any of the following categories of evidence:
vlog za poravnavo.
leniency statements; and
Tožnik lahko vloži utemeljeno zahtevo, da nacionalno sodišče dostopi do dokazov iz točke (a) ali (b) odstavka 6 zgolj z namenom, da se zagotovi, da njihova vsebina izpolnjuje opredelitve iz točk 16 in 18 člena 2.
settlement submissions.
Pri tej oceni lahko nacionalna sodišča zaprosijo za pomoč le ustrezni organ, pristojen za konkurenco.
A claimant may present a reasoned request that a national court access the evidence referred to in point (a) or (b) of paragraph 6 for the sole purpose of ensuring that their contents correspond to the definitions in points (16) and (18) of Article 2.
Tudi avtorji zadevnih dokazov imajo možnost, da so zaslišani.
In that assessment, national courts may request assistance only from the competent competition authority.
Nacionalno sodišče nikakor ne dovoli dostopa do teh dokazov drugim strankam ali tretjim osebam.
The authors of the evidence in question may also have the possibility to be heard.
Če je z odstavkom 6 zajet le del zahtevanih dokazov, se preostali deli dajo na vpogled v skladu z zadevnimi odstavki o razkritju iz tega člena, odvisno od vrste, v katero spadajo.
In no case shall the national court permit other parties or third parties access to that evidence.
Brez poseganja v ta člen se lahko kadar koli v postopku odškodninske tožbe odredi razkritje dokazov iz spisa organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, ki ne spadajo v nobeno od vrst dokazov, navedenih v tem členu.
If only parts of the evidence requested are covered by paragraph 6, the remaining parts thereof shall, depending on the category under which they fall, be released in accordance with the relevant paragraphs of this Article.
Države članice zagotovijo, da nacionalna sodišča od organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, zahtevajo razkritje dokazov iz njegovega spisa le, kadar stranka ali tretja oseba ni zmožna ali ne more ustrezno zagotoviti zahtevanih dokazov.
The disclosure of evidence in the file of a competition authority that does not fall into any of the categories listed in this Article may be ordered in actions for damages at any time, without prejudice to this Article.
Če so organi, pristojni za konkurenco, pripravljeni izraziti svoja stališča glede sorazmernosti zahtev za razkritje, lahko organ, pristojen za konkurenco, na lastno pobudo predloži ugotovitve nacionalnemu sodišču, pred katerim se zahteva odredba za razkritje.
Member States shall ensure that national courts request the disclosure from a competition authority of evidence included in its file only where no party or third party is reasonably able to provide that evidence.
Člen 7
To the extent that a competition authority is willing to state its views on the proportionality of disclosure requests, it may, acting on its own initiative, submit observations to the national court before which a disclosure order is sought.
Omejitve uporabe dokazov, pridobljenih izključno z dostopom do spisa organa, pristojnega za konkurenco
Article 7
Države članice zagotovijo, da dokazi vrst, navedenih v členu 6(6), ki jih pridobi fizična ali pravna oseba izključno z dostopom do spisa organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, bodisi veljajo za nedopustne v primeru odškodninskih tožb ali pa so kako drugače zaščiteni v skladu z veljavnimi nacionalnimi pravili, da se v celoti upoštevajo omejitve razkritja dokazov iz člena 6.
Limits on the use of evidence obtained solely through access to the file of a competition authority
Države članice zagotovijo, da vse dokler organ, pristojen za konkurenco, ne zaključi postopka z izdajo odločbe ali na drugačen način, dokazi vrst, navedenih v členu 6(5), ki jih pridobi fizična ali pravna oseba izključno z dostopom do spisa navedenega organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, bodisi veljajo za nedopustne v primeru odškodninskih tožb ali pa so kako drugače zaščiteni v skladu z veljavnimi nacionalnimi pravili, da se v celoti upoštevajo omejitve razkritja dokazov iz člena 6
Member States shall ensure that evidence in the categories listed in Article 6(6) which is obtained by a natural or legal person solely through access to the file of a competition authority is either deemed to be inadmissible in actions for damages or is otherwise protected under the applicable national rules to ensure the full effect of the limits on the disclosure of evidence set out in Article 6.
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko dokaze, ki jih pridobi fizična ali pravna oseba izključno z dostopom do spisa organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, in za katere ne velja odstavek 1 ali 2, v primeru odškodninske tožbe uporabi le navedena oseba ali fizična ali pravna oseba, ki je pravni naslednik njenih pravic, vključno z osebo, ki je prevzela njen zahtevek.
Member States shall ensure that, until a competition authority has closed its proceedings by adopting a decision or otherwise, evidence in the categories listed in Article 6(5) which is obtained by a natural or legal person solely through access to the file of that competition authority is either deemed to be inadmissible in actions for damages or is otherwise protected under the applicable national rules to ensure the full effect of the limits on the disclosure of evidence set out in Article 6.
Člen 8
Member States shall ensure that evidence which is obtained by a natural or legal person solely through access to the file of a competition authority and which does not fall under paragraph 1 or 2, can be used in an action for damages only by that person or by a natural or legal person that succeeded to that person's rights, including a person that acquired that person's claim.
Kazni
Article 8
Države članice zagotovijo, da imajo nacionalna sodišča možnost strankam, tretjim osebam in njihovim pravnim zastopnikom učinkovito naložiti kazni, če:
Penalties
ne izpolnijo odredbe za razkritje, ki jo izda nacionalno sodišče, ali zavrnejo njeno izpolnitev;
Member States shall ensure that national courts are able effectively to impose penalties on parties, third parties and their legal representatives in the event of any of the following:
uničijo relevantne dokaze;
their failure or refusal to comply with the disclosure order of any national court;
ne izpolnijo obveznosti, naložene z odredbo nacionalnega sodišča za varstvo zaupnih informacij, ali zavrnejo njihovo izpolnitev, ali
their destruction of relevant evidence;
kršijo omejitve uporabe dokazov iz tega poglavja.
their failure or refusal to comply with the obligations imposed by a national court order protecting confidential information;
Države članice zagotovijo, da so kazni, ki jih lahko naložijo nacionalna sodišča, učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne.
their breach of the limits on the use of evidence provided for in this Chapter.
Kar zadeva ravnanje strank v postopku odškodninske tožbe, kazen, ki je na voljo nacionalnim sodiščem, vključuje možnost sprejetja odločitve v škodo strank, kot so domneva, da je relevantno vprašanje dokazano, ali popolna ali delna zavrnitev zahtevkov in ugovorov ter možnost odreditve plačila stroškov.
Member States shall ensure that the penalties that can be imposed by national courts are effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
POGLAVJE III
The penalties available to national courts shall include, with regard to the behaviour of a party to proceedings for an action for damages, the possibility to draw adverse inferences, such as presuming the relevant issue to be proven or dismissing claims and defences in whole or in part, and the possibility to order the payment of costs.
UČINEK NACIONALNIH ODLOČB, ZASTARANJE IN SOLIDARNA ODGOVORNOST
CHAPTER III
Člen 9
EFFECT OF NATIONAL DECISIONS, LIMITATION PERIODS, JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY
Učinek nacionalnih odločb