natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Taking into account the need for the unitary support to farmers with smaller holdings to be sufficient in order to achieve the objective of income support effectively, Member States should be allowed to redistribute direct support between farmers by granting them an extra payment for the first hectares.
Ob upoštevanju potrebe, da mora biti enotna podpora kmetom z manjšimi kmetijskimi gospodarstvi zadostna, če želimo učinkovito doseči cilj dohodkovne podpore, bi moralo biti državam članicam dovoljeno, da neposredno podporo ponovno razdelijo med kmete, tako da jim odobrijo dodatno plačilo za prve hektare.
One of the objectives of the new CAP is the enhancement of environmental performance through a mandatory "greening" component of direct payments which will support agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment applicable throughout the Union.
Eden od ciljev nove SKP je izboljšanje okoljske učinkovitosti z obvezno „zeleno“ komponento neposrednih plačil, ki bo v vsej Uniji podprla uporabo kmetijskih praks, ki ugodno vplivajo na podnebje in okolje.
For that purpose, Member States should use part of their national ceilings for direct payments in order to grant, on top of the basic payment, an annual payment which may take account of internal convergence in the Member State or region, for compulsory practices to be followed by farmers addressing, as a priority, both climate and environment policy goals.
V ta namen bi morale države članice uporabiti del sredstev v okviru svojih nacionalnih zgornjih mej za neposredna plačila, da bi poleg osnovnega plačila, pri katerem se lahko upošteva notranja konvergenca v državi članici ali regiji, odobrile letno plačilo za obvezne prakse, ki jih morajo izvajati kmetje in so prednostno namenjene izpolnjevanju ciljev podnebne in okoljske politike.
Those practices should take the form of simple, generalised, non-contractual and annual actions that go beyond cross-compliance and that are linked to agriculture, such as crop diversification, the maintenance of permanent grassland, including traditional orchards where fruit trees are grown in low density on grassland, and the establishment of ecological focus areas.
Te prakse bi se morale izvajati v obliki enostavnih, splošnih, nepogodbenih in letnih ukrepov, ki presegajo navzkrižno skladnost in so povezani s kmetijstvom, kot so diverzifikacija kmetijskih rastlin, ohranjanje trajnega travinja, ki vključuje tradicionalne sadovnjake, v katerih se sadno drevje goji v nizki gostoti na travinju, in vzpostavitev površin z ekološkim pomenom.
In order to better achieve the objectives of "greening" and to allow for its efficient administration and control, such practices should apply to the whole eligible area of the holding.
Da bi lažje dosegli cilje zelene komponente in omogočili njeno učinkovito upravljanje in kontrolo, bi se morale te prakse uporabljati na celotni upravičeni površini kmetijskega gospodarstva.
The compulsory nature of those practices should also concern farmers whose holdings are fully or partly situated in "Natura 2000" areas covered by Council Directive 92/43/EEC [13] and by Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [14], or in areas covered by Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [15], as long as those practices are compatible with the objectives of those Directives.
Te prakse bi morale biti obvezne tudi za kmete, katerih gospodarstva so v celoti ali delno na območjih „Natura 2000“, na katera se nanaša Direktiva Sveta 92/43/EGS [13] ter Direktiva 2009/147/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [14], ali na območjih, na katera se nanaša Direktiva 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [15], če so te prakse združljive s cilji navedenih direktiv.
Given the recognised environmental benefits of the organic farming systems, farmers should, for those units of their holding on which they fulfil the conditions laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 [16], benefit from the "greening" component without needing to fulfil any further obligation.
Ob upoštevanju priznanih ugodnih vplivov sistemov ekološkega kmetovanja na okolje, bi morali kmetje za tiste površine njihovega kmetijskega gospodarstva, za katere izpolnjujejo pogoje iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 834/2007 [16], biti upravičeni do „zelene“ komponente, ne da bi izpolnjevali kakršne koli dodatne obveznosti.
Failure to respect the "greening" component should lead to penalties on the basis of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013.
Neupoštevanje „zelene“ komponente bi bilo treba kaznovati na podlagi Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013.
In order to accommodate the diversity of agricultural systems and the different environmental situations across the Union, it is justified to recognise, in addition to the three greening practices established in this Regulation, practices covered by agri-environment-climate measures or certification schemes that are similar to greening and that yield an equivalent or higher level of benefit for the climate and the environment.
Da bi se prilagodili raznovrstnosti kmetijskih sistemov in različnim okoljskim razmeram po vsej Uniji, je upravičeno, da se poleg treh praks zelene komponente, določenih v tej uredbi, priznajo prakse, zajete v kmetijsko-okoljsko-podnebnih ukrepih ali shemah certificiranja, ki so podobne zeleni komponenti in imajo enake ali celo boljše učinke na podnebje in okolje.
For reasons of legal clarity these practices should be laid down in an Annex to this Regulation.
Zaradi pravne jasnosti bi bilo treba te prakse določiti v prilogi k tej uredbi.
Member States should decide whether to offer to farmers the possibility of using equivalent practices and the greening practices established in this Regulation in order to require the farmer to observe the practices best suited to ensure the objectives of the measure and they should notify the Commission of their decisions.
Države članice bi se morale odločiti, ali bodo kmetom omogočile uporabe enakovrednih praks in praks zelene komponente iz te uredbe, da bi od njih zahtevale uporabo najprimernejših praks za izpolnjevanje ciljev tega ukrepa, in Komisijo obvestiti o svojih odločitvah.
For reasons of legal certainty, the Commission should assess whether the practices covered by the notified equivalent measures are covered by the Annex.
Zaradi pravne varnosti bi morala Komisija oceniti, ali so prakse, zajete v uradno sporočenih enakovrednih ukrepih, zajete v prilogi.
If the Commission considers this not to be the case, it should notify Member States accordingly by means of an implementing act adopted without applying Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
Če Komisija meni, da temu ni tako, bi morala ustrezno obvestiti države članice z izvedbenim aktom, sprejetim brez uporabe Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011.
In order to allow a simpler implementation of equivalence and for reasons of controllability, rules should be laid down as regards the area coverage of equivalent measures, taking into account the specific characteristics of agri-environment-climate measures and certification schemes.
Da bi omogočili enostavnejše izvajanje enakovrednosti in zaradi možnosti kontrole bi bilo treba določiti pravila glede območja, ki jih enakovredni ukrepi pokrivajo, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati značilnosti kmetijsko-okoljsko-podnebnih ukrepov in shem certificiranja.
In order to ensure that equivalent practices are properly applied and that double funding is avoided, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of adding practices to the list of equivalent practices, establishing requirements for the national or regional certification schemes and, where necessary, establishing detailed rules for the calculation of related amounts.
Da bi zagotovili pravilno uporabo enakovrednih praks in se izognili dvojnemu financiranju, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejetje nekaterih aktov, da bi seznamu enakovrednih praks dodali nove prakse, določili zahteve za nacionalne ali regionalne sheme certificiranja in, kadar je to potrebno, določili podrobna pravila za izračun zadevnih zneskov.
The obligations relating to crop diversification should be applied in a way that takes into account the difficulty for smaller farms to diversify, while continuing to make progress towards enhanced environmental benefit, and in particular the improvement of soil quality.
Obveznosti v zvezi z diverzifikacijo kmetijskih rastlin bi bilo treba izvajati tako, da bi upoštevali težave majhnih kmetij pri diverzifikaciji in hkrati še naprej spodbujali večje koristi za okolje, zlasti izboljšanje kakovosti tal.
Exceptions should be provided for farms that already fulfil the objectives of crop diversification as a result of being covered to a significant extent by grassland or fallowland, for specialised farms rotating their parcels each year or for farms that because of their geographical localisation would have excessive difficulties in introducing a third crop.
Določiti bi bilo treba izjeme za kmetije, ki že izpolnjujejo cilje diverzifikacije kmetijskih rastlin, tako da v veliki meri zajemajo travinje ali praho, za specializirane kmetije, ki vsako leto izvedejo kolobarjenje svojih parcel, ali za kmetije, ki bi imele zaradi svoje geografske lege prevelike težave pri uvajanju tretje kmetijske rastline.
In order to ensure that the obligations referred to in the crop diversification measure are applied in a proportionate and non-discriminatory way and lead to an enhanced environmental protection, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission in respect of recognising further genera and species and laying down rules concerning the application of the precise calculation of shares of different crops.
Da bi bile obveznosti v okviru ukrepa diverzifikacije kmetijskih rastlin izpolnjene sorazmerno in nediskriminatorno in da bi hkrati spodbudili večje varstvo okolja, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejetje nekaterih aktov v povezavi s priznavanjem novih rodov in vrst in določanjem pravil v zvezi z natančnim izračunavanjem deležev različnih kmetijskih rastlin.
For the sake of the environmental benefits of permanent grassland and in particular carbon sequestration, provision should be made for the maintenance of permanent grassland.
Zaradi okoljskih koristi, ki jih prinašajo trajne travinje in zlasti sekvestracija ogljika, bi bilo treba sprejeti določbe za ohranjanje trajnega travinja.
This protection should consist of a ban on ploughing and conversion on the environmentally most sensitive areas in "Natura 2000" areas covered by Directives 92/43/EEC and 2009/147/EC, and of a more general safeguard, based on a ratio of permanent grassland, against conversion to other uses.
To varstvo bi moralo zajemati prepoved oranja in prestrukturiranja okoljsko najbolj občutljivih območij „Nature 2000“, zajetih v direktivah 92/43/EGS in 2009/147/ES in bolj splošno zaščito, ki bi temeljila na razmerju trajnega travinja v primerjavi s prestrukturiranjem v druge uporabe.
Member States should be empowered to delineate further environmentally sensitive areas not covered by those Directives.
Države članice bi morale imeti pristojnost za razmejitev nadaljnjih okoljsko občutljivih območij, ki niso zajeta v navedenih direktivah.
In addition, they should choose at which territorial level the ratio should apply.
Poleg tega bi morale določiti, na kateri teritorialni ravni bi se moral ta delež uporabljati.
In order to assure an efficient protection of permanent grassland, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of defining the framework for the designation, by Member States, of permanent grasslands not covered by Directives 92/43/EEC or 2009/147/EC.
Da bi zagotovili učinkovito varstvo trajnega travinja, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejetje nekaterih aktov za določitev okvira za določitev, s strani držav članic, trajnega travinja, ki ni zajeto v direktivah 92/43/EGS ali 2009/147/ES.
In order to ensure that the ratio of permanent grassland to the total agricultural area is correctly determined and maintained, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the establishment of detailed methods for the determination of that ratio, detailed rules on maintenance of permanent grassland and the relevant time frame for an obligation upon individual farmers to reconvert land.
Da bi se razmerje trajnega travinja v okviru skupnih kmetijskih površin pravilno določilo in ohranjalo, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejetje nekaterih aktov v povezavi z vzpostavitvijo podrobnih metod za določanje tega razmerja, podrobnimi pravili glede ohranjanja trajnega travinja in ustreznega časovnega okvira, ki ga imajo posamezni kmetje za izpolnitev obveznosti preusmeritve zemljišč.
Ecological focus areas should be established, in particular, in order to safeguard and improve biodiversity on farms.
Določiti bi bilo treba površine z ekološkim pomenom, predvsem z namenom ohranitve in izboljšanja biotske raznovrstnosti na kmetijah.
The ecological focus area should therefore consist of areas directly affecting biodiversity such as land lying fallow, landscape features, terraces, buffer strips, afforested areas and agro-forestry areas, or indirectly affecting biodiversity through a reduced use of inputs on the farm, such as areas covered by catch crops and winter green cover.
Površine z ekološkim pomenom bi zato morale zajemati površine, ki neposredno vplivajo na biotsko raznovrstnost, kot so zemljišče v prahi, krajinske značilnosti, terase, varovalni pasovi, pogozdene površine in kmetijsko-gozdarska območja, oziroma površine, ki posredno vplivajo na biotsko raznovrstnost prek zmanjšane uporabe vložkov na kmetiji, kot so površine z naknadnimi posevki in zimsko ozelenitvijo.
The obligations laid down in respect of the ecological focus area should be applied in a way that avoids putting a disproportionate burden on smaller farms in comparison to the additional enhanced environmental benefit.
Obveznosti, določene v zvezi z ukrepom površine z ekološkim pomenom, bi bilo treba izvesti tako, da breme za male kmete ne bi bilo nesorazmerno v primerjavi z večjimi okoljskimi koristmi.
Exceptions should be provided for farms that already fulfil the objectives of ecological focus areas by being covered to a significant extent by grassland or fallowland.
Določiti bi bilo treba izjeme za kmetije, ki že izpolnjujejo cilje površin z ekološkim pomenom in v veliki meri zajemajo travinje ali praho.
Exceptions should also be provided, in the case of predominantly forested Member States, for farmers that pursue an agricultural activity in areas facing natural constraints in certain predominantly forested areas where there is a significant risk of land abandonment.
V primeru pretežno gozdnatih držav članic bi bilo treba določiti izjeme tudi za kmete, ki opravljajo kmetijsko dejavnost na površinah z naravnimi omejitvami v nekaterih pretežno gozdnatih območjih, kjer je velika nevarnost opuščanja zemljišč.
In addition, provision should be made for the possibility for Member States and farmers to implement at a regional or collective level the obligation in order to obtain adjacent ecological focus areas that are more beneficial for the environment.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba predvideti možnost, da države članice in kmetije izpolnjujejo to obveznost na regionalni ali kolektivni ravni, da bi se pridobile sosednje površine z ekološkim pomenom, ki so bolj koristne za okolje.
For the sake of simplification, Member States should have the option to standardise the measurement of the ecological focus areas.
Zaradi poenostavitve bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da poenotijo merjenje površin z ekološkim pomenom.
In order to ensure the that ecological focus areas are established in an efficient and coherent way, while taking into account Member States' specific characteristics, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission in respect of laying down further criteria for the qualification of areas as ecological focus areas;
Da bi zagotovili, da se vzpostavijo površine z ekološkim pomenom ob upoštevanju posebnosti držav članic, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejetje nekaterih aktov v povezavi z določanjem nadaljnjih meril za uvrščanje površin med površine z ekološkim pomenom;
recognising other types of ecological focus areas;
priznavanjem drugih vrst površin z ekološkim pomenom;
establishing conversion and weighting factors for certain types of ecological focus area;
določanjem konverzijskih in utežnih faktorjev za nekatere vrste površine z ekološkim pomenom;
establishing rules for the implementation, by Member States, of a part of the ecological focus area at regional level;
določanjem pravil za izvajanje dela površine z ekološkim pomenom na regionalni ravni s strani držav članic;
In order to promote the sustainable development of agriculture in areas with specific natural constraints, Member States should be able to use part of their direct payments ceilings to grant an annual area-based payment, on top of the basic payment, to all farmers operating in those areas or in some of those areas, where decided by the Member State.
Da bi spodbudili trajnostni razvoj kmetijstva na območjih s posebnimi naravnimi omejitvami, bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti uporabo dela sredstev v okviru svojih zgornjih mej za neposredna plačila, da bi poleg osnovnega plačila odobrile letno plačilo na površino vsem kmetom, ki opravljajo dejavnost na teh površinah ali na nekaterih izmed teh površin, kadar se za to odloči država članica.
That payment should not replace the support given under rural development programmes and should not be granted to farmers in areas which were designated in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 but have not been designated in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013.
To plačilo ne bi smelo nadomestiti podpore v okviru programov razvoja podeželja in ne bi smelo biti odobreno kmetom na območjih, ki so bila določena v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1698/2005, vendar niso bila določena v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 1305/2013.
The creation and development of new economic activity in the agricultural sector by young farmers is financially challenging and constitutes an element that should be considered in the allocation and targeting of direct payments.
Vzpostavitev in razvoj novih gospodarskih dejavnosti v kmetijskem sektorju s strani mladih kmetov sta finančno zahtevna, kar bi bilo treba upoštevati pri dodeljevanju in usmerjanju neposrednih plačil.
This development is essential for the competitiveness of the agricultural sector in the Union and, for that reason, an income support to young farmers commencing their agricultural activities should be established in order to facilitate the initial establishment of young farmers and the structural adjustment of their holdings after the initial setting up.
Ta razvoj je bistvenega pomena za konkurenčnost kmetijskega sektorja v Uniji in zaradi tega bi bilo treba vzpostaviti dohodkovno podporo za mlade kmete, ki začenjajo svoje kmetijske dejavnosti, da jim bi olajšali zagon njihove dejavnosti in strukturno prilagoditev njihovih kmetijskih gospodarstev po začetni vzpostavitvi.
For that purpose, Member States should use part of their national ceilings for direct payments to grant to young farmers an annual payment, on top of the basic payment.
Za ta namen bi morale imeti države članice uporabiti dela svojih nacionalnih zgornjih mej za neposredna plačila za odobritev letnega plačila mladim kmetom, in sicer poleg osnovnega plačila.
Member States should be able to decide on a calculation method for that payment and, if that method implies an obligation to set a limit on the payment per farmer, such a limit is to be set in respect of the general principles of Union law.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost, da sprejmejo metodo izračunavanja tega plačila in če ta metoda vključuje obveznost določitve omejitve plačila na kmeta, se taka omejitev določi na podlagi splošnih načel prava Unije.
Since it should only cover the initial period of the life of the business and should not become an operating aid, that payment should only be granted during a maximum period of five years.
To plačilo bi moralo biti odobreno za obdobje največ petih let, saj bi moralo zajemati le začetno obdobje izvajanja dejavnosti in ne bi smelo postati pomoč za tekoče poslovanje.
It should be available to young farmers commencing their agricultural activity who are no more than 40 years of age in the year of the first submission of the application under the basic payment scheme or under the single area payment scheme.
Na voljo bi moralo biti mladim kmetom, ki začenjajo opravljati kmetijsko dejavnost in v letu prve predložitve vloge v okviru sheme osnovnega plačila ali v okviru sheme enotnega plačila na površino niso starejši od 40 let.
In order to guarantee the protection of the rights of beneficiaries and to avoid discrimination between them, the power to adopt certain acts should be delegated to the Commission in respect of defining the conditions under which a legal person may be considered eligible for receiving the payment for young farmers.
Da bi zagotovili varstvo pravic upravičencev in se izognili diskriminaciji med njimi, bi bilo treba na Komisijo prenesti pooblastilo za sprejetje nekaterih aktov v povezavi z določitvijo pogojev, pod katerimi se pravna oseba lahko šteje za upravičeno do prejema plačila za mlade kmete.
Member States should be allowed to use part of their national ceilings for direct payments for coupled support in certain sectors or regions in clearly defined cases.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba dovoliti, da del sredstev v okviru svojih nacionalnih zgornjih mej za neposredna plačila uporabijo za vezano podporo v nekaterih sektorjih ali regijah v jasno opredeljenih primerih.
The resources that may be used for any coupled support should be limited to an appropriate level, while allowing such support to be granted in Member States in their specific sectors or regions facing particular situations where specific types of farming or specific agricultural sectors are particularly important for economic, environmental and/or social reasons.
Sredstva, ki se lahko uporabijo za katero koli vezano podporo, bi bilo treba omejiti na ustrezno raven, hkrati pa dovoliti, da se takšna podpora odobri v posameznih sektorjih ali regijah držav članic, za katere so značilne posebne razmere in v katerih so zaradi gospodarskih, okoljskih in/ali socialnih razlogov zlasti pomembne določene vrste kmetovanja ali določeni kmetijski sektorji.
Member States should be allowed to use up to 8 % of their national ceilings for this support, or 13 % where their level of coupled support exceeds 5 % in at least one of the years of the period 2010-2014 or where they apply the single area payment scheme until 31 December 2014.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba dovoliti, da za to podporo uporabijo do 8 % svojih nacionalnih zgornjih mej ali 13 %, kadar njihova raven vezane podpore preseže 5 % v vsaj enem od let v obdobju 2010–2014 ali kadar uporabijo shemo enotnega plačila na površino do 31. decembra 2014.
Furthermore, in order to maintain the protein-based autonomy of the breeding sector, Member States which decide to use at least 2 % of their national ceilings to support the production of protein crops should be allowed to increase those percentages by up to two percentage points.
Poleg tega, da se ohrani samooskrba živinoreje, ki temelji na beljakovinah, bi moralo biti državam članicam, ki se odločijo za uporabo vsaj 2 % svojih nacionalnih zgornjih mej za podporo proizvodnje stročnic, dovoljeno, da te deleže povečajo za največ dve odstotni točki.
In duly justified cases where certain sensitive needs in a sector or a region are demonstrated, and upon approval by the Commission, Member States should be allowed to use more than 13 % of their national ceiling.
V ustrezno utemeljenih primerih, ko se v določeni sektorju ali regiji pokažejo določene pereče potrebe, in na podlagi odobritve Komisije bi bilo treba državam članicam dovoliti, da uporabijo več kot 13 % svojih nacionalnih zgornjih mej.