natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the procedure for adoption, publication and accessibility of the minutes;
postopek za sprejetje, objavo in dostopnost zapisnika;
the arrangements for the establishment and activities of working groups under the monitoring committees;
ureditve za ustanovitev in dejavnosti delovnih skupin v okviru odborov za spremljanje;
the provisions on conflict of interest for partners involved in monitoring, evaluation and calls for proposals;
določbe o navzkrižju interesov za partnerje, ki sodelujejo pri spremljanju, vrednotenju in razpisih za zbiranje predlogov;
the conditions, principles and arrangements for reimbursement rules, capacity building opportunities and use of technical assistance.
pogoji, načela in ureditve glede pravil v zvezi z nadomestili, priložnosti za povečanje zmogljivosti in uporabe tehnične pomoči.
MAIN PRINCIPLES AND GOOD PRACTICES CONCERNING THE INVOLVEMENT OF RELEVANT PARTNERS IN THE PREPARATION OF CALLS OF PROPOSALS, PROGRESS REPORTS AND IN RELATION TO MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PROGRAMMES
GLAVNA NAČELA IN DOBRE PRAKSE V ZVEZI S SODELOVANJEM USTREZNIH PARTNERJEV PRI PRIPRAVI RAZPISOV ZA ZBIRANJE PREDLOGOV, POROČIL O NAPREDKU TER SPREMLJANJU IN VREDNOTENJU PROGRAMOV
Obligations relating to data protection, confidentiality and conflict of interest
Obveznosti v zvezi z varstvom podatkov, zaupnostjo in navzkrižji interesov
Member States shall ensure that partners involved in the preparation of calls of proposals, progress reports and in monitoring and evaluation of programmes are aware of their obligations related to data protection, confidentiality and conflict of interest.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se partnerji, ki sodelujejo pri pripravi razpisov za zbiranje predlogov, poročil o napredku ter spremljanju in vrednotenju programov, zavedajo svojih obveznosti v zvezi z varstvom podatkov, zaupnostjo in navzkrižji interesov.
Involvement of relevant partners in the preparation of calls for proposals
Sodelovanje ustreznih partnerjev pri pripravi razpisov za zbiranje predlogov
Managing authorities shall take appropriate measures to avoid potential conflict of interest where involving relevant partners in the preparation of calls for proposals or in their assessment.
Organi upravljanja sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za preprečevanje morebitnega navzkrižja interesov, če ustrezne partnerje vključijo v pripravo razpisov za zbiranje predlogov ali njihovo ocenjevanje.
Involvement of relevant partners in the preparation of progress reports
Sodelovanje ustreznih partnerjev pri pripravi poročil o napredku
Member States shall involve relevant partners in the preparation of the progress reports on implementation of the Partnership Agreement referred to in Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, in particular concerning the assessment of the role of partners in the implementation of the Partnership Agreement and the overview of the opinions given by the partners during the consultation, including, where appropriate, the description of the way in which the opinions of partners have been taken into account.
Države članice ustrezne partnerje vključijo v pripravo poročil o napredku pri izvajanju partnerskega sporazuma iz člena 52 Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013, zlasti v zvezi z ocenjevanjem vloge partnerjev pri izvajanju partnerskega sporazuma in pregledu mnenj, ki so jih partnerji izrazili med posvetovanjem, po potrebi vključno z opisom načina, kako so se upoštevala mnenja partnerjev.
Involvement of relevant partners in the monitoring of programmes
Sodelovanje ustreznih partnerjev pri spremljanju programov
Managing authorities shall involve the partners, within the framework of the monitoring committee and their working groups, in assessing performance of the programme, including the conclusions of the performance review, and in the preparation of the annual implementation reports on the programmes.
Organi upravljanja v okviru odbora za spremljanje in njegovih delovnih skupin partnerje vključijo v ocenjevanje uspešnosti programa, vključno z ugotovitvami pregleda uspešnosti, in v pripravo letnih poročil o izvajanju programov.
Involvement of partners in the evaluation of programmes
Sodelovanje partnerjev pri vrednotenju programov
Managing authorities shall involve the relevant partners in the evaluation of programmes within the framework of the monitoring committees and, where appropriate, specific working groups established by the monitoring committees for this purpose.
Organi upravljanja ustrezne partnerje vključijo v vrednotenje programov v okviru odborov za spremljanje in po potrebi posebnih delovnih skupin, ki jih odbori za spremljanje ustanovijo v ta namen.
Managing authorities for the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Cohesion Fund programmes shall consult the partners on the reports summarising the findings of evaluations carried out during the programming period in accordance with Article 114(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013.
Organi upravljanja za programe v okviru Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj (ESRR), Evropskega socialnega sklada (ESS) in Kohezijskega sklada se s partnerji posvetujejo o poročilih, ki povzemajo ugotovitve vrednotenj, izvedenih v programskem obdobju v skladu s členom 114(2) Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013.
INDICATIVE AREAS, THEMES AND GOOD PRACTICES CONCERNING THE USE OF THE ESI FUNDS TO STRENGTHEN THE INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY OF RELEVANT PARTNERS AND THE ROLE OF THE COMMISSION IN DISSEMINATION OF GOOD PRACTICES
OKVIRNA PODROČJA, TEME IN ZGLEDI DOBRIH PRAKS V ZVEZI Z UPORABO SKLADOV ESI ZA KREPITEV INSTITUCIONALNE ZMOGLJIVOSTI USTREZNIH PARTNERJEV IN VLOGA KOMISIJE PRI ŠIRJENJU DOBRIH PRAKS
Strengthening the institutional capacity of relevant partners
Krepitev institucionalne zmogljivosti ustreznih partnerjev
The managing authority shall examine the need to make use of technical assistance in order to support the strengthening of the institutional capacity of partners, in particular as regards small local authorities, economic and social partners and non-governmental organisations, in order to help them so that they can effectively participate in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the programmes.
Organ upravljanja preuči, ali je potrebna tehnična pomoč za krepitev institucionalne zmogljivosti partnerjev, zlasti manjših lokalnih organov, ekonomskih in socialnih partnerjev in nevladnih organizacij, da bi se jim omogočilo, da lahko učinkovito sodelujejo pri pripravi, izvajanju, spremljanju in vrednotenju programov.
The support referred to in paragraph 1 may take the form of, inter alia, dedicated workshops, training sessions, coordination and networking structures or contributions to the cost of participating in meetings on the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of a programme.
Pomoč iz odstavka 1 je med drugim lahko v obliki namenskih delavnic, usposabljanj, struktur za koordinacijo in mreženje ali udeležbe pri stroških partnerjev, ki nastanejo zaradi udeležbe na zasedanjih v zvezi s pripravo, izvajanjem, spremljanjem in vrednotenjem programov.
For rural development programmes, the support referred to in paragraph 1 may be provided through the national rural network established in accordance with Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013.
Za programe za razvoj podeželja se lahko pomoč iz odstavka 1 zagotovi v okviru nacionalne mreže za podeželje, vzpostavljene v skladu s členom 54 Uredbe (EU) št. 1305/2013.
For ESF programmes, managing authorities in less developed or transition regions or in Member States eligible for Cohesion Fund support shall ensure that, according to need, appropriate ESF resources are allocated to the capacity building activities of social partners and non-governmental organisations that are involved in the programmes.
Za programe ESS organi upravljanja v manj razvitih regijah, v regijah v prehodu ali v državah članicah, ki so upravičene do sredstev Kohezijskega sklada, zagotovijo, da se ustrezna sredstva ESS po potrebi dodelijo dejavnostim za povečanje zmogljivosti socialnih partnerjev in nevladnih organizacij, ki sodelujejo v programih.
For European territorial cooperation, support under paragraphs 1 and 2 may also cover support for partners to strengthen their institutional capacity for participating in international cooperation activities.
V okviru evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja lahko pomoč iz odstavkov 1 in 2 zajema tudi pomoč za partnerje, da bi okrepili svoje institucionalne zmogljivosti za sodelovanje v dejavnostih mednarodnega sodelovanja.
Role of the Commission in the dissemination of good practices
Vloga Komisije pri širjenju dobrih praks
The Commission shall set up a cooperation mechanism called the European Community of Practice on Partnership, which shall be common to the ESI Funds and open to interested Member States, managing authorities and organisations representing the partners at Union level.
Komisija vzpostavi mehanizem sodelovanja, imenovan Evropska skupnost praks o partnerstvu, ki je skupen vsem skladom ESI in odprt zainteresiranim državam članicam, organom upravljanja in organizacijam, ki zastopajo partnerje na ravni Unije.
The European Community of Practice on Partnership shall facilitate exchange of experience, capacity building, as well as dissemination of relevant outcomes.
Evropska skupnost praks o partnerstvu omogoča lažjo izmenjavo izkušenj, povečanje zmogljivosti ter medsebojno posredovanje pomembnih rezultatov.
The Commission shall make available examples of good practice in organising the partnership.
Komisija zagotovi primere dobrih praks pri organiziranju partnerstev.
The exchange of experience on the identification, transfer and dissemination of good practice and innovative approaches in relation to the implementation of interregional cooperation programmes and actions under Article 2(3)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1299/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [6] shall include experience of partnership in cooperation programmes.
Izmenjava izkušenj pri odkrivanju, prenašanju in širjenju dobrih praks in inovativnih pristopov pri izvajanju medregionalnih programov sodelovanja in ukrepov na podlagi člena 2(3)(c) Uredbe (EU) št. 1299/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6] vključuje izkušnje iz partnerstev v programih sodelovanja.
Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services (OJ L 373, 21.12.2004, p. 37).
Direktiva Sveta 2004/113/ES z dne 13. decembra 2004 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk pri dostopu do blaga in storitev ter oskrbi z njimi (UL L 373, 21.12.2004, str. 37).
Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 487).
Uredba (EU) št. 1305/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str. 487.
Regulation (EU) No 1299/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on specific provisions for the support from the European Regional Development Fund to the European territorial cooperation goal (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 259).
Uredba (EU) št. 1299/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o posebnih določbah za podporo cilju evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str. 259.
In order to ensure transparent and effective involvement of relevant partners, Member States and managing authorities shall consult them on the process and timetable of the preparation of the Partnership Agreement and programmes.
Da bi se zagotovilo pregledno in učinkovito sodelovanje ustreznih partnerjev, se države članice in organi upravljanja z njimi posvetujejo o postopku in urniku za pripravo partnerskega sporazuma in programov.
In doing so, they shall keep them fully informed of their content and any changes thereof.
Pri tem morajo partnerji biti v celoti obveščeni o njihovi vsebini in o vseh morebitnih spremembah.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 241/2014
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 241/2014
supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for Own Funds requirements for institutions
o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z regulativnimi tehničnimi standardi glede kapitalskih zahtev za institucije
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 [1], and in particular third subparagraph of Article 26(4); third subparagraph of Article 27(2); third subparagraph of Article 28(5); third subparagraph of Article 29(6); third subparagraph of Article 32(2); third subparagraph of Article 36(2); third subparagraph of Article 41(2); third subparagraph of Article 52(2); third subparagraph of Article 76(4); third subparagraph of Article 78(5); third subparagraph of Article 79(2); third subparagraph of Article 83(2); third subparagraph of Article 481(6); third subparagraph of Article 487(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o bonitetnih zahtevah za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja ter o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 [1] in zlasti tretjega pododstavka člena 26(4), tretjega pododstavka člena 27(2), tretjega pododstavka člena 28(5), tretjega pododstavka člena 29(6), tretjega pododstavka člena 32(2), tretjega pododstavka člena 36(2), tretjega pododstavka člena 41(2), tretjega pododstavka člena 52(2), tretjega pododstavka člena 76(4), tretjega pododstavka člena 78(5), tretjega pododstavka člena 79(2), tretjega pododstavka člena 83(2), tretjega pododstavka člena 481(6) in tretjega pododstavka člena 487(3) Uredbe,
The provisions in this Regulation are closely linked, since they refer to elements of own funds requirements of institutions and to deductions from those same elements of own funds for the application of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
Določbe v tej uredbi so tesno povezane, ker se nanašajo na elemente kapitalskih zahtev institucij in odbitke od teh elementov kapitala za uporabo Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
To ensure coherence between those provisions, which should enter into force at the same time, and to facilitate a comprehensive view and compact access to them by persons subject to those obligations, it is desirable to include all of the regulatory technical standards on own funds required by Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, in a single Regulation.
Za zagotovitev skladnosti med navedenimi določbami, ki bi morale začeti veljati hkrati, ter za omogočanje celovitega pregleda nad določbami in enotnega dostopa do njih za osebe, za katere veljajo navedene obveznosti, je zaželeno, da se vsi regulativni tehnični standardi glede kapitala, ki se zahtevajo v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št. 575/2013, vključijo v eno uredbo.
In order to bring more convergence across the Union in the way foreseeable dividends have to be deducted from interim or year-end profits, it is necessary to introduce a hierarchy of ways to evaluate the deduction, by first having a decision on distributions from the relevant body, then the dividend policy, and thirdly an historical payout ratio.
Za zagotovitev večjega zbliževanja v Uniji glede načina, kako se odbijajo predvidljive dividende od dobičkov med letom ali čistih dobičkov poslovnega leta, je treba vzpostaviti hierarhijo načinov za ocenjevanje odbitkov, in sicer najprej s sprejetjem odločitve zadevnega organa glede razdelitve, nato s politiko dividend in nazadnje s količnikom preteklih izplačil.
In addition to the general requirements for own funds as added to or amended by specific requirements laid down in terms of own funds for these types of institutions, a specification of conditions according to which competent authorities may determine that a type of undertaking recognised under applicable national law qualifies as a mutual, cooperative society, savings institution or similar institution for the purpose of own funds is necessary in order to mitigate the risk that any institution could operate under the specific status of mutual, cooperative society, savings institution or similar institution to which specific own funds requirements may apply, where the institution does not possess features which are common to the Union cooperative banking sector institutions.
Poleg splošnih zahtev za kapital, ki so bile dodane posebnim zahtevam, določenim glede kapitala za te vrste institucij, ali spremenjene z njimi, je potrebna specifikacija pogojev, pod katerimi lahko pristojni organi določijo, da se vrsta družbe, priznana v skladu z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo, za namen kapitala šteje za vzajemno institucijo, zadružno institucijo, hranilnico ali podobno institucijo. To je potrebno zaradi zmanjšanja tveganja, da bi lahko katera koli institucija poslovala na podlagi posebnega statusa vzajemne institucije, zadružne institucije, hranilnice ali podobne institucije, za katero lahko veljajo posebne kapitalske zahteve, če institucija nima značilnosti, ki so skupne institucijam sektorja zadružnega bančništva Unije.
For an institution recognised under applicable national law as a mutual, cooperative society, savings institution or similar institution, it is appropriate in some cases to distinguish between the holders of the institution’s Common Equity Tier 1 instruments and the members of that institution since members generally need to hold capital instruments in order to be entitled to a right to dividends, as well as to a right to a part of the profits and reserves.
V zvezi z institucijo, ki je v skladu z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo priznana kot vzajemna institucija, zadružna institucija, hranilnica ali podobna institucija, je v nekaterih primerih ustrezno ločiti med imetniki instrumentov navadnega lastniškega temeljnega kapitala institucije in družbeniki te institucije, ker morajo običajno družbeniki imeti kapitalske instrumente, da so upravičeni do dividend ter dela dobičkov in rezerv.
In general, the common feature of a cooperative, savings institution, mutual or similar institution is to carry on business for the benefit of the customers and members of the institution, and as a service to the public.
Na splošno so skupne značilnosti zadružne institucije, hranilnice, vzajemne institucije ali podobne institucije poslovanje v korist strank in družbenikov institucije ter javne storitve.
The primary objective is not to generate and pay a financial return to external providers of capital, like shareholders of joint stock companies.
Glavni cilj ni ustvarjanje finančnega donosa in izplačilo zunanjim ponudnikom kapitala, kot so delničarji delniških družb.
For this reason, capital instruments used by these institutions are different from capital instruments issued by joint stock companies that generally grant the holders a full access to reserves and profits in going concern and liquidation and are transferable to a third party.
Zato se kapitalski instrumenti, ki jih uporabljajo te institucije, razlikujejo od kapitalskih instrumentov, ki jih izdajo delniške družbe, ki delničarjem običajno odobrijo poln dostop do rezerv in dobičkov iz rednega poslovanja in likvidacije ter se lahko prenesejo na tretjo osebo.
Where an institution issues different types of instruments under Article 29 of that Regulation, there should be no privileges assigned to only some of these types of instruments other than the ones foreseen in Article 29(4) of that Regulation.
Če institucija izda različne vrste instrumentov v skladu s členom 29 navedene uredbe, prednosti ne bi smele biti dodeljene le nekaterim od teh vrst instrumentov, ki niso predvideni v členu 29(4) navedene uredbe.
Savings institutions are generally structured like a foundation where there is no owner of the capital, meaning nobody who participates in the capital and may benefit from the profits of the institution.
Hranilnice so običajno strukturirane kot fundacije, v katerih ni lastnika kapitala, kar pomeni, da ni nikogar, ki bi bil udeležen v kapitalu in bi lahko imel koristi od dobičkov institucije.
One of the key feature of mutuals is that, in general, members do not contribute to the capital of the institution and do not, in the ordinary course of the business, benefit from direct distribution of the reserves.
Ena od glavnih značilnosti vzajemnih institucij je, da družbeniki na splošno ne vlagajo v kapital institucije in v okviru običajnega poslovanja nimajo koristi od neposredne razdelitve rezerv.
This should not prevent these institutions, in order to develop their business, from issuing Common Equity Tier 1 instruments to investors or members who may participate in the capital and benefit to some extent from the reserves in going concern situations and in liquidation.
Tem institucijam to zaradi razvoja poslovanja ne bi smelo preprečevati izdajanja instrumentov navadnega lastniškega temeljnega kapitala vlagateljem ali družbenikom, ki so lahko udeleženi v kapitalu in imajo omejene koristi od rezerv v času rednega poslovanja in pri likvidaciji.
All existing institutions already set up and recognised as mutuals, cooperative societies, savings institutions or similar institutions under applicable national law before 31 December 2012 continue to be classified as such for the purpose of Part Two of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 without regard to their legal form as long as they continue to meet the criteria that determined such recognition as one of those entities under applicable national law.
Vse obstoječe institucije, ki so bile ustanovljene in priznane kot vzajemne institucije, zadružne institucije, hranilnice ali podobne institucije v skladu z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo pred 31. decembrom 2012, še naprej štejejo za take za namen dela 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 ne glede na njihovo pravno obliko, dokler izpolnjujejo merila, ki določajo tako priznanje za oblike navedenih subjektov v skladu z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo.
When defining situations which would qualify as indirect funding for all types of capital instruments it is more practical and comprehensive to do so by specifying the characteristics of the opposite concept, direct funding.
Primeri, ki bi lahko šteli za posredno financiranje vseh vrst kapitalskih instrumentov, se lahko bolj praktično in celovito opredelijo z natančno določitvijo značilnosti nasprotnega koncepta, tj. neposrednega financiranja.
In order to apply own funds rules to mutuals, cooperative societies, savings institutions and similar institutions, the specificities of such institutions have to be taken into account in an appropriate manner.
Da se bodo lahko kapitalska pravila uporabljala za vzajemne institucije, zadružne institucije, hranilnice in podobne institucije, je treba ustrezno upoštevati posebnosti takih institucij.
Rules should be put in place to ensure, among others, that such institutions are able to limit the redemption of their capital instruments, where appropriate.
Vzpostaviti bi bilo treba pravila, s katerimi bi se med drugim zagotovilo, da lahko take institucije omejijo odkup svojih kapitalskih instrumentov, kadar je to ustrezno.
Therefore, where the refusal of the redemption of instruments is prohibited under applicable national law for these types of institutions, it is essential that the provisions governing the instruments give the institution the ability to defer their redemption and limit the amount to be redeemed.
Če je tem vrstam institucij zavrnitev odkupa instrumentov prepovedana z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo, je zato bistveno, da se z določbami, ki urejajo instrumente, instituciji omogoči, da odloži njihov odkup in omeji znesek odkupa.