natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the case where EC verification is most effectively undertaken by using information collected by the infrastructure manager, contracting entity or the main contractors involved (for example data obtained using track recording vehicle or other measuring devices), the notified body shall take this information into account to assess conformity.
Za sistem tirne širine 1520 mm se namesto točke (2) po končani gradnji pred začetkom obratovanja preverijo medtirne razdalje na kritičnih mestih, kjer je razlika do izračunane mejne vrednosti namestitvene medtirne razdalje manjša kot 50 mm.
Application of module SH1
Ocena nazivne tirne širine
The SH1 module may be chosen only where the activities contributing to the proposed subsystem to be verified (design, manufacturing, assembling, installation) are subject to a quality management system for design, production, final product inspection and testing, approved and surveyed by a notified body.
Nominalna tirna širina se pri pregledu projektiranja izvede na podlagi preverjanja vložnikove lastne izjave.
If an innovative solution is proposed for the infrastructure subsystem, the procedure described in Article 10 shall apply.
Ocena nazivne tirne širine po končani gradnji pred začetkom obratovanja se izvede na podlagi preverjanja potrdila za tirni prag kot komponente interoperabilnosti.
Assessment of Structure gauge
Za necertificirane komponente interoperabilnosti se pridobi ocena nazivne tirne širine na podlagi preverjanja vložnikove lastne izjave.
Assessment of structure gauge as a design review shall be done against characteristic cross sections using the results of calculations made by infrastructure manager or the contracting entity on the basis of sections 5, 7, 10, Annex C and point D.4.8 of Annex D of EN 15273-3:2013.
Ocena trasiranja
Characteristic cross sections are:
Pri pregledu projektiranja se ukrivljenost, nadvišanje, primanjkljaj nadvišanja in nenadna sprememba primanjkljaja nadvišanja ocenijo glede na lokalno konstrukcijsko določeno hitrost.
track without cant,
Ocena trasiranja kretnic in tirnih križišč ni potrebna.
track with maximum cant,
Ocena primanjkljaja nadvišanja za vlake, ki so projektirani za vožnjo z večjimi primanjkljaji nadvišanja
track with a civil engineering structure over the line
Točka 4.2.4.3(2) določa, da je „za vlake, posebej namenjene za vožnjo z večjim primanjkljajem nadvišanja (na primer veččlenske enote z manjšimi osnimi obremenitvami; vozila, opremljena s posebno opremo za vožnjo skozi loke), […] dovoljena vožnja z višjimi vrednostmi primanjkljaja nadvišanja ob dokazilu, da se to lahko doseže na varen način“.
any other location where the designed installation limit gauge is approached by less than 100 mm or the installation nominal gauge or uniform gauge is approached by less than 50 mm.
To dokazilo ni zajeto v področju uporabe te TSI in zato ni predmet verifikacije podsistema infrastruktura, ki jo opravi priglašeni organ.
After assembly before putting into service clearances shall be verified at locations where the designed installation limit gauge is approached by less than 100 mm or the installation nominal gauge or uniform gauge is approached by less than 50 mm.
To dokazilo mora zagotoviti prevoznik v železniškem prometu, po potrebi v sodelovanju z upravljavcem infrastrukture.
Instead of point (1), for the 1520 mm track gauge system assessment of structure gauge as a design review is to be made against characteristic cross sections using the uniform structure gauge ‘S’ as defined in Appendix H to this TSI.
Ocena konstrukcijsko določenih vrednosti za ekvivalentno koničnost
Instead of point (1), for the 1600 mm track gauge system assessment of structure gauge as a design review is to be made against characteristic cross sections using the structure gauge ‘IRL1’ as defined in Appendix O to this TSI.
Ocena konstrukcijsko določenih vrednosti za ekvivalentno koničnost se izvede na podlagi izračunov, ki jih opravi upravljavec infrastrukture ali naročnik na podlagi standarda EN 15302:2008+A1:2010.
Assessment of distance between track centres
Ocena profila glave tirnice
A design review for assessment of the distance between track centres shall be done using the results of calculations made by the Infrastructure Manager or the contracting entity on the basis of chapter 9 of EN 15273-3:2013.
Konstrukcijsko določeni profil novih tirnic se preveri glede na točko 4.2.4.6.
The nominal distance between track centres shall be checked at the line layout where distances are given in parallel to the horizontal plane.
Ponovno uporabljene obnovljive tirnice niso predmet zahtev glede profila glave tirnice iz točke 4.2.4.6.
The limit installation distance between track centres shall be checked with the radius and relevant cant.
Ocena kretnic in tirnih križišč
After assembly before putting into service, distance between track centres shall be verified at critical locations where the limit installation distance between track centres as defined according chapter 9 of EN 15273-3:2013 is approached by less than 50 mm.
Ocena kretnic in tirnih križišč v povezavi s točkami 4.2.5.1 do 4.2.5.3 se opravi na podlagi preverjanja obstoja lastne izjave upravljavca infrastrukture ali naročnika.
Instead of point (1), for the 1520 mm track gauge system a design review for assessment of the distance between track centres is to be made using the results of calculations made by the infrastructure manager or the contracting entity.
Ocena novih konstrukcij, zemeljskih objektov in učinkov zemeljskega pritiska
Instead of point (2), for the 1520 mm track gauge system after assembly before putting into service, distance between track centres shall be verified at critical locations where the limit installation distance between track centres is approached by less than 50 mm.
Ocena novih konstrukcij se opravi tako, da se preveri, ali v projektu upoštevane prometne obremenitve in mejne vrednosti vegavosti tira izpolnjujejo minimalne zahteve iz točk 4.2.7.1 in 4.2.7.3.
Assessment of nominal track gauge
Od priglašenega organa se ne zahteva niti preverjanje projekta niti izdelava kakršnih koli izračunov.
Assessment of the nominal track gauge at design review shall be done by checking the self-declaration of the applicant.
Pri pregledu vrednosti faktorja alfa, uporabljene pri projektiranju v skladu s točko 4.2.7.1, je treba samo preveriti, ali vrednost faktorja alfa ustreza preglednici 11.
Assessment of the nominal track gauge at assembly before putting into service shall be done by checking the interoperability constituent sleeper's certificate.
Ocena novih zemeljskih objektov ali učinkov zemeljskega pritiska se opravi tako, da se preveri, ali v projektu upoštevane navpične obremenitve izpolnjujejo zahteve iz točke 4.2.7.2.
For non-certified interoperability constituents assessment of the nominal track gauge shall be done by checking the self-declaration of the applicant.
Pri pregledu vrednosti faktorja alfa, uporabljene pri projektiranju v skladu s točko 4.2.7.2, je treba preveriti samo, ali vrednost faktorja alfa ustreza preglednici 11.
Assessment of track layout
Ocena obstoječih konstrukcij
At design review the curvature, cant, cant deficiency and abrupt change of cant deficiency shall be assessed against the local design speed.
Ocena obstoječih konstrukcij glede na zahteve iz točke 4.2.7.4(3)(b) in (c) se opravi na podlagi ene od naslednjih metod:
Assessment of switches and crossings layout is not required.
preveri se, ali so vrednosti EN-kategorij prog v kombinaciji z dovoljenimi hitrostmi, ki so bile objavljene ali naj bi bile objavljene, na progah, na katerih se te konstrukcije nahajajo, v skladu z zahtevami iz Dodatka E k tej TSI;
Assessment of cant deficiency for trains designed to travel with higher cant deficiency
preveri se, ali so vrednosti EN-kategorij prog v kombinaciji z dovoljenimi hitrostmi, določenimi za te strukture ali projekt, v skladu z zahtevami iz Dodatka E k tej TSI;
Point 4.2.4.3(2) states that ‘It is permissible for trains specifically designed to travel with higher cant deficiency (for example multiple units with lower axle loads; vehicles with special equipment for the negotiation of curves) to run with higher cant deficiency values, subject to a demonstration that this can be achieved safely’.
preveri se, ali prometne obremenitve, določene za te strukture ali projekte izpolnjujejo minimalne zahteve iz točk 4.2.7.1.1 in 4.2.7.1.2.
This demonstration is outside the scope of this TSI and thus not subject to a notified body verification of the infrastructure subsystem.
Pri pregledu vrednosti faktorja alfa glede na točko 4.2.7.1.1 je treba preveriti samo, ali je vrednost faktorja alfa v skladu z vrednostjo faktorja alfa, navedeno v preglednici 11.
The demonstration shall be undertaken by the RU, if necessary in cooperation with the IM.
Ne zahteva se niti preverjanje projekta niti izdelava kakršnih koli izračunov.
Assessment of design values for equivalent conicity
Za oceno obstoječih konstrukcij se uporablja točka 4.2.7.4(4).
Assessment of design values for equivalent conicity shall be done using the results of calculations made by the infrastructure manager or the contracting entity on the basis of EN 15302:2008+A1:2010.
Ocena odmika peronov
Assessment of railhead profile
Ocena razdalje med osjo tira in robom perona kot pregled projektiranja se izvede na podlagi izračunov, ki jih opravi upravljavec infrastrukture ali naročnik v skladu s poglavjem 13 standarda EN 15273-3:2013.
The design profile of new rails shall be checked against point 4.2.4.6.
Po končani gradnji pred začetkom obratovanja se preverijo proste razdalje.
Reused serviceable rails shall not be subject to the requirements for railhead profile as set out in point 4.2.4.6.
Odmik se preveri na koncih perona in vsakih 30 m v premi oziroma vsakih 10 m v krivini.
Assessment of switches and crossings
Za sistem tirne širine 1520 mm se namesto točke (1) ocena razdalje med osjo tira in robom perona kot pregled projektiranja izvede na podlagi zahtev iz točke 4.2.9.3.
Assessment of switches and crossings related to points 4.2.5.1 to 4.2.5.3 shall be done by checking that a self-declaration of the infrastructure manager or contracting entity exists.
Smiselno se uporablja točka (2).
Assessment of new structures, earthworks and earth pressure effects
Za sistem tirne širine 1600 mm se namesto točke (1) ocena razdalje med osjo tira in robom perona kot pregled projektiranja izvede na podlagi zahtev iz točke 4.2.9.3(4).
Assessment of new structures shall be done by checking the traffic loads and the track twist limit used for design against the minimum requirements of points 4.2.7.1 and 4.2.7.3.
Ocena največjega nihanja tlaka v predorih
The notified body is not required to review the design nor carry out any calculations.
Ocena največjega nihanja tlaka v predorih (merilo 10 kPa) se izvede na podlagi numeričnih simulacij v skladu s poglavjema 4 in 6 standarda EN 14067-5:2006+A1:2010, ki jih opravi upravljavec infrastrukture ali naročnik na podlagi vseh pričakovanih pogojev obratovanja z vlaki, ki so skladni s TSI lokomotive in potniška tirna vozila ter ki bodo v določenih predorih, ki se preverjajo, predvidoma vozili s hitrostjo 200 km/h ali več.
When reviewing the value of factor alpha used in the design according to point 4.2.7.1 it is only necessary to check that the value of factor alpha satisfies Table 11.
Uporabljeni vhodni parametri morajo biti taki, da izpolnjujejo referenčno oznako značilnega tlaka vlakov, opredeljeno v TSI lokomotive in potniška tirna vozila.
Assessment of new earthworks and earth pressure effects shall be done by checking the vertical loads used for design according to requirements of point 4.2.7.2.
Referenčne površine prečnih prerezov interoperabilnih vlakov (konstantno vzdolž vlaka), ki jih je treba upoštevati, morajo neodvisno od tega, ali gre za vlečno ali vlečeno enoto, znašati:
When reviewing the value of factor alpha used in the design according to point 4.2.7.2 it is only necessary to check that the value of factor alpha satisfies Table 11.
12 m2 za vozila, zasnovana za referenčna kinematična profila GC in DE3;
Assessment of existing structures
11 m2 za vozila, zasnovana za referenčna kinematična profila GA in GB;
Assessment of existing structures against the requirements of point 4.2.7.4(3) (b) and (c) shall be done by one of the following methods:
10 m2 za vozila, zasnovana za referenčni kinematični profil G1.
check that the values of EN line categories, in combination with the allowed speed published or intended to be published for the lines containing the structures, is in line with the requirements of Appendix E of this TSI,
Upoštevani profil vozila je določen na podlagi profilov, izbranih v skladu s točko 4.2.1.
check that the values of EN line categories, in combination with the allowed speed specified for the structures or for the design, is in line with the requirements of Appendix E of this TSI,
Pri oceni se lahko upošteva morebitne konstrukcijske elemente, ki zmanjšujejo nihanja tlaka, ter dolžino predora.
check the traffic loads specified for the structures or for the design against the minimum requirements of points 4.2.7.1.1 and 4.2.7.1.2.
Nihanja tlaka zaradi atmosferskih ali geografskih pogojev se lahko zanemarijo.
When reviewing the value of factor alpha according to point 4.2.7.1.1 it is only necessary to check that the value of factor alpha is in line with the value of factor alpha mentioned in Table 11.
Ocena vpliva bočnega vetra
It is not required to review the design nor carry out any calculations.
To dokazilo o varnosti ni zajeto v področju uporabe te TSI in zato ni predmet verifikacije, ki jo opravi priglašeni organ.
For existing structures assessment point 4.2.7.4(4) applies respectively.
To dokazilo mora zagotoviti upravljavec infrastrukture, po potrebi v sodelovanju s prevoznikom v železniškem prometu.
Assessment of platform offset
Ocena fiksnih naprav za servisiranje vlakov
Assessment of the distance between the track centre and the platform edge as a design review shall be done using the results of calculations made by the Infrastructure Manager or the contracting entity on the basis of chapter 13 of EN 15273-3:2013.
Za oceno fiksnih naprav za servisiranje vlakov je odgovorna zadevna država članica.
After assembly before putting into service clearances shall be verified.
Domneva o skladnosti tehničnih rešitev v fazi projektiranja se lahko oceni pred določenim projektom in neodvisno od njega.
The offset is checked at the ends of the platform and every 30 m in straight track and every 10 m in curved track.
Ocena odpora tira na odprti progi
Instead of point (1), for the 1520 mm track gauge system assessment of the distance between the track centre and the platform edge as a design review shall be done against requirements of point 4.2.9.3.
Skladnost tira z zahtevami iz točke 4.2.6 se lahko dokaže s sklicevanjem na obstoječo zasnovo tira, ki je skladna z obratovalnimi pogoji za zadevni podsistem.
Point (2) applies accordingly.
Zasnova tira je opredeljena s tehničnimi značilnostmi, določenimi v Dodatku C.1 k tej TSI, in z njegovimi obratovalnimi pogoji, določenimi v Dodatku D.1 k tej TSI.
Instead of point (1), for the 1600 mm track gauge system assessment of the distance between the track centre and the platform edge as a design review shall be done against requirements of point 4.2.9.3(4).
Zasnova tira se šteje za obstoječo, če sta izpolnjena naslednja pogoja:
Assessment of maximum pressure variations in tunnels
zasnova tira normalno obratuje že vsaj eno leto in
Assessment of maximum pressure variation in the tunnel (10 kPa criterion) shall be done using the results of numerical simulations according to chapters 4 and 6 of EN 14067-5:2006+A1:2010 made by the infrastructure manager or the contracting entity on the basis of all expected operational conditions with the trains complying with the Locomotives and Passengers TSI and intended to run at speeds greater than or equal to 200 km/h in the specific tunnel to be assessed.
skupna tonaža, ki je bila prepeljana preko tira v obdobju normalnega obratovanja, znaša vsaj 20 milijonov bruto ton.
The input parameters to be used are to be such that the reference characteristic pressure signature of the trains set out in the locomotives and passenger rolling stock TSI is fulfilled.
Obratovalni pogoji za obstoječo zasnovo tira se nanašajo na pogoje, ki se uporabljajo med normalnim obratovanjem.
The reference cross section areas of the interoperable trains (constant along a train) to be considered is to be, independently to each motor or trailer vehicle:
Ocena za potrditev obstoječe zasnove tira se izvede na podlagi preverjanja, ali so tehnične značilnosti iz Dodatka C.1 k tej TSI in pogoji uporabe iz Dodatka D.1 k tej TSI določeni ter ali so na voljo sklicevanja na predhodno uporabo zadevne zasnove tira.
12 m2 for vehicles designed for GC and DE3 reference kinematic profile,
Kadar se v projektu uporabi predhodno ocenjena zasnova tira, priglašeni organ oceni le, ali se upoštevajo pogoji uporabe.
11 m2 for vehicles designed for GA and GB reference kinematic profile,
Za nove zasnove tira, ki temeljijo na obstoječih zasnovah, se lahko nova ocena izvede na podlagi preverjanja razlik in ocenjevanja njihovega vpliva na odpor tira.
10 m2 for vehicles designed for G1 reference kinematic profiles.
Ta ocena se lahko podkrepi na primer z računalniško simulacijo ali s preskusi v laboratoriju ali na kraju samem.
The vehicle gauge to be considered shall be set on the basis of the gauges selected according to point 4.2.1.
Zasnova tira se šteje za novo, če se je spremenila vsaj ena od tehničnih značilnosti iz Dodatka C k tej TSI ali vsaj eden od pogojev uporabe iz Dodatka D k tej TSI.
The assessment may take into account construction features which reduce the pressure variation if any, as well as the tunnel length.
Ocena za kretnice in tirna križišča
The pressure variations due to atmospheric or geographical conditions can be neglected.
Za oceno odpora tira na kretnicah in tirnih križiščih se uporabljajo določbe iz točke 6.2.5.1.
Assessment of effect of crosswinds
V Dodatku C.2 so določene tehnične značilnosti za zasnovo kretnic in tirnih križišč, v Dodatku D.2 pa pogoji uporabe zasnove kretnic in tirnih križišč.
This demonstration of the safety is outside the scope of this TSI and thus not subject to a notified body verification.
Ocena konstrukcijsko določene geometrije kretnic in tirnih križišč se izvede v skladu s točko 6.2.4.8 te TSI.
The demonstration shall be undertaken by the infrastructure manager, if necessary in cooperation with the railway undertaking.
Ocena največje nevodene dolžine nepremičnih dvojnih src kretnic in tirnih križišč se izvede v skladu s točko 6.2.4.8 te TSI.
Assessment of fixed installations for servicing trains
Točka 7.5 dopušča začetek obratovanja proge pri hitrosti, ki je nižja od najvišje predvidene hitrosti.
Assessment of fixed installations for servicing trains is in the responsibility of the Member State concerned.
Ta točka določa zahteve za ES-verifikacijo v tem primeru.
Presumption of conformity at design stage for technical solutions may be assessed prior and independent from a specific project.
Nekatere mejne vrednosti, določene v oddelku 4, so odvisne od predvidene progovne hitrosti.
Assessment of track resistance for plain line
Skladnost drugih značilnosti za predvideno progovno hitrost ostaja v veljavi.
The demonstration of conformity of the track to the requirements of point 4.2.6 may be done by reference to an existing track design which meets the operating conditions intended for the subsystem concerned.
Za izjavo o interoperabilnosti pri tej predvideni hitrosti je treba skladnost značilnosti, ki začasno niso upoštevane, oceniti šele, ko dosežejo zahtevano raven.
A track design shall be defined by the technical characteristics as set out in Appendix C.1 to this TSI and by its operating conditions as set out in Appendix D.1 to this TSI.
Točka 4.5 od upravljavca infrastrukture zahteva, da za vsako interoperabilno progo vodi dokumentacijo o vzdrževanju za podsistem infrastruktura.
A track design is considered to be existing, if both of the following conditions are met:
Priglašeni organ potrdi, da dokumentacija o vzdrževanju obstaja in vsebuje postavke, navedene v točki 4.5.1.
the track design has been in normal operation for at least one year and
Priglašeni organ ni odgovoren za ocenjevanje primernosti podrobnih zahtev, določenih v dokumentaciji o vzdrževanju.
the total tonnage over the track was at least 20 million gross tons for the period of normal operation.
Priglašeni organ sklic na dokumentacijo o vzdrževanju, ki jo zahteva točka 4.5.1 te TSI, vključi v tehnično dokumentacijo, navedeno v členu 18(3) Direktive 2008/57/ES.
The operating conditions for an existing track design refer to conditions which have been applied in normal operation.
Priglašeni organ lahko do 31. maja 2021 izda ES-potrdilo o verifikaciji za podsistem, čeprav nekatere komponente interoperabilnosti, ki so vgrajene v podsistem, nimajo ustreznih ES-izjav o skladnosti in/ali primernosti za uporabo v skladu s to TSI, če so izpolnjena naslednja merila:
The assessment to confirm an existing track design shall be performed by checking that the technical characteristics as set out in Appendix C.1 to this TSI and conditions of use as set out in Appendix D.1 to this TSI are specified and that the reference to the previous use of the track design is available.
priglašeni organ je preveril skladnost podsistema z zahtevami iz oddelka 4 in z oddelki od 6.2 do 7 (razen točke 7.7 „Posebni primeri“) te TSI.
When a previously assessed existing track design is used in a project, the notified body shall only assess that the conditions of use are respected.
Poleg tega se skladnost komponent interoperabilnosti z oddelkoma 5 in 6.1 ne uporablja, in
For new track designs that are based on existing track designs, a new assessment can be performed by verifying the differences and evaluating their impact on the track resistance.
komponente interoperabilnosti, ki niso zajete v ustrezni ES-izjavi o skladnosti in/ali primernosti za uporabo, se uporabljajo v podsistemu, ki je že odobren in je pred začetkom veljavnosti te TSI začel obratovati v najmanj eni državi članici.
Assessment for switches and crossing
V ES-izjavi o verifikaciji podsistema se jasno navede:
The provisions as set out in point 6.2.5.1 are applicable for the assessment of track resistance for switches and crossings.
katere komponente interoperabilnosti so bile ocenjene kot del podsistema;
Appendix C.2 sets out the technical characteristics of switches and crossings design and Appendix D.2 sets out the conditions of use of switches and crossings design.
potrditev, da podsistem vsebuje komponente interoperabilnosti, enake tistim, ki so bile verificirane kot del podsistema;
Assessment of design geometry of switches and crossings shall be done according to point 6.2.4.8 of this TSI.
razlog(-e), zakaj proizvajalec za navedene komponente interoperabilnosti ni zagotovil ES-izjave o skladnosti in/ali primernosti za uporabo, preden so bile vključene v podsistem, vključno z uporabo nacionalnih predpisov, priglašenih v skladu s členom 17 Direktive 2008/57/ES.
Assessment of maximum unguided length of fixed obtuse crossings shall be done according to point 6.2.4.8 of this TSI.
V prehodnem obdobju in po končanem prehodnem obdobju do nadgradnje ali obnove podsistema (ob upoštevanju odločitve države članice o uporabi TSI) se komponente interoperabilnosti, ki nimajo ES-izjave o skladnosti in/ali primernosti za uporabo in so iste vrste, lahko na odgovornost organa pristojnega za vzdrževanje uporabljajo za zamenjave pri podsistemu, povezane z vzdrževanjem (rezervni deli).
Point 7.5 allows a line to be put into service at a lower speed than the ultimate intended speed.
V vsakem primeru mora organ, pristojen za vzdrževanje, zagotoviti, da so komponente za zamenjave, povezane z vzdrževanjem, primerne za uporabo, se uporabljajo na njihovem področju uporabe in omogočajo doseganje interoperabilnosti v železniškem sistemu ter hkrati izpolnjujejo bistvene zahteve.
This point sets out requirements for EC verification in this case.
Take komponente morajo biti sledljive in certificirane v skladu s katerim koli nacionalnim ali mednarodnim predpisom ali širše priznanim kodeksom ravnanja na področju železnic.