natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, the Commission considered the required fees to serve as reasonably proxy for those that would be payable under the Agreements.
Vendar je Komisija menila, da so zahtevane pristojbine razumen približek pristojbinam, ki bi se plačevale na podlagi sporazumov.
The GOC also claimed that the banks which undertook the Agreements with the sampled exporters are not public bodies or were not entrusted by the government to do so.
Kitajska vlada je trdila tudi, da banke, ki so sklenile sporazume z vzorčenimi izvozniki, niso javni organi in da jim te naloge ni zaupala vlada.
The banks involved were the same banks which provided preferential financing and in the recitals (159) — (168) and (169) — (180) above the Commission provided a detailed explanation why they are public bodies and/or why they are entrusted and directed by the GOC.
Vpletene banke so iste banke, ki so zagotovile preferenčno financiranje, Komisija pa je v uvodnih izjavah od (159) do (168) in od (169) do (180) podrobno pojasnila, zakaj se štejejo za javne organe in/ali zakaj jim kitajska vlada zaupa naloge in jim ukazuje.
The GOC claimed that the Commission's claim that in normal market circumstances credit lines are subject to substantial commitment and administration fees is groundless as such fees only apply to ‘committed credit lines’.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da je trditev Komisije, da se v normalnih tržnih razmerah za take kreditne linije uporabljajo znatne provizije za neizkoriščeni del posojila in upravne pristojbine, neutemeljena, saj se takšne provizije in pristojbine uporabljajo le za „zavezujoče kreditne linije“.
As stated in the recital above the credit line used as a benchmark is not substantially different in its conditions from the other commercial credit lines obtained by the sampled exporting producers, including from banks outside China.
Kot je navedeno v zgornji uvodni izjavi, pogoji kreditne linije, ki je bila uporabljena za referenčno vrednost, niso bistveno drugačni od pogojev drugih poslovnih kreditnih linij, ki so jih pridobili vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki, tudi od bank zunaj Kitajske.
Moreover one of the banks which concluded several such agreements with sampled exporting producers seems to charge similar fees to its clients abroad [100].
Poleg tega ena od bank, ki so sklenile več takih sporazumov z vzorčenimi proizvajalci izvozniki, očitno zaračunava podobne pristojbine svojim strankam v tujini [100].
The GOC also claimed that the Commission has not provided evidence to support its statement that the Government provision of credit lines (i.e. the Agreements) is part of preferential lending.
Kitajska vlada je tudi trdila, da Komisija ni zagotovila dokazov v podporo trditvi, da je zagotavljanje kreditnih linij (tj. sporazumov) s strani vlade del zagotavljanja preferenčnih posojil.
The provision of credit lines is the standard part of financing provided by banks to companies and the Agreements are separate and distinct measures falling under the scope of preferential lending.
Zagotavljanje kreditnih linij je standardni del financiranja družb s strani bank, sporazumi pa so ločeni in drugačni ukrepi, ki spadajo na področje preferenčnih posojil.
As stated in recital (102) above the GOC provides through a number of planning and policy documents and laws for the preferential financing to the PV industry.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (102), kitajska vlada fotonapetostni industriji prek številnih načrtov in političnih dokumentov ter zakonov zagotavlja preferenčno financiranje.
In addition numerous loans were drawn under these agreements, which clearly shows that they are an integral part of preferential financing of the PV industry.
Poleg tega so bila na podlagi teh sporazumov pridobljena številna posojila, kar jasno kaže, da so sporazumi sestavni del preferenčnega financiranja fotonapetostne industrije.
One exporting producer claimed that the provision of credit lines is not a specific subsidy.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da zagotavljanje kreditnih linij ni specifična subvencija.
As explained in recital (441) above the provision of credit lines is an integral part of preferential lending and therefore the specificity analysis in recitals (191), (192), (209) and (428) above equally applies to the provision of credit lines.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (441), je zagotavljanje kreditnih linij sestavni del zagotavljanja preferenčnih posojil, zato analiza specifičnosti v uvodnih izjavah (191), (192), (209) in (428) velja tudi za zagotavljanje kreditnih linij.
According to the complainant, the Commission should have established a subsidy margin for the use of export buyers credits, as the EXIM Bank refused to cooperate.
Po mnenju pritožnika bi morala Komisija določiti stopnjo subvencije za uporabo izvoznih kreditov kupcev, ker je Kitajska izvozno-uvozna banka zavrnila sodelovanje.
The Commission should have used the information in the complaint and the US DOC findings in the similar PV case.
Komisija bi morala uporabiti podatke iz pritožbe in ugotovitve ministrstva za trgovino ZDA v podobni zadevi v zvezi s fotonapetostnimi izdelki.
The Commission investigated the allegations in the complaint but no evidence was found that the sampled exporting producers benefited from such measures during the IP.
Komisija je preiskala trditve v pritožbi, vendar ni našla dokazov, da so imeli vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki v OP ugodnosti iz takšnih ukrepov.
It is noted that the investigation periods for the US case and for the case at hand were different.
Opozoriti je treba, da se je obdobje preiskave v zadevi v ZDA razlikovalo od obdobja te preiskave.
Comments of parties concerning Export Guarantee and Insurance for green technologies
Pripombe strani v zvezi z izvoznimi jamstvi in zavarovanji za zelene tehnologije
With regard to the documents requested by the Commission at the verification visit as specified in recitals (220) and (221), the GOC claimed that it has not been clarified when the 840 Plan was requested, that Sinosure's 2012 financial statements were not available at the time of verification, and that information concerning the sampled companies were confidential and in any event the relevant contracts were not held at the headquarters of Sinosure.
V zvezi z dokumenti, ki jih je Komisija zahtevala med preveritvenim obiskom, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (220) in (221), je kitajska vlada trdila, da ni bilo pojasnjeno, kdaj se je zahteval načrt 840, da računovodski izkazi družbe Sinosure za leto 2012 v času preveritve niso bili na voljo, da so informacije v zvezi z vzorčenimi družbami zaupne in da v vsakem primeru zadevne pogodbe niso bile hranjene na sedežu Sinosure.
The Commission refers to its explanations included in recitals (219), (220), and (223) which deal with all these arguments.
Komisija se sklicuje na svoja pojasnila iz uvodnih izjav (219), (220) in (223), v katerih je obravnavala vse te argumente.
With regard to the 840 Plan, the Commission adds that it asked for all of the relevant documents concerning the activity of Sinosure and the alleged subsidy programme benefiting the sampled exporters, and that this 840 Plan is certainly relevant for its findings, together with all the other documents specified in recital (236), as supported by the explanations in recital (232).
Komisija glede načrta 840 dodaja, da je prosila za vse pomembne dokumente v zvezi z dejavnostjo družbe Sinosure in domnevnim subvencijskim programom, ki je vzorčenim izvoznikom prinesel koristi, ter da je ta načrt 840 vsekakor pomemben za njene ugotovitve, skupaj z vsemi drugimi dokumenti, navedenimi v uvodni izjavi (236), kar je podprto s pojasnili v uvodni izjavi (232).
As for the Sinosure's 2012 financial statements, the Commission asked for the trial accounts, if the 2012 financial statements were not finalised, but Sinosure also refused to provide any trial accounts for 2012.
Kar zadeva računovodske izkaze družbe Sinosure za leto 2012, je Komisija prosila za predhodne izkaze, če računovodski izkazi za leto 2012 še niso dokončani, vendar je Sinosure zavrnila tudi predložitev predhodnih izkazov za leto 2012.
The GOC also claimed that there is no legal or factual evidence to support the conclusion that the photovoltaic industry is a ‘strategic industry’ and that this would be the result of a presumption.
Kitajska vlada je trdila tudi, da ni pravnih ali dejanskih dokazov, ki bi podpirali ugotovitev, da je fotonapetostna industrija „strateška industrija“, in da bi to bil rezultat domneve.
The Commission refers to the explanation in recital (231) and recalls that this point was specifically confirmed by the GOC during the verification visit.
Komisija se sklicuje na obrazložitev v uvodni izjavi (231) in opozarja, da je kitajska vlada med preveritvenim obiskom izrecno potrdila to točko.
With regard to the similar claim concerning the 840 plan, the 421 plan and the measures to support ‘Strategic Emerging Industries’ and to the claim that the plans would not be legally binding, the Commission refers to the explanations in recitals (232) — (234) respectively.
Komisija se v zvezi s podobno trditvijo glede načrta 840, načrta 421 in ukrepov za podporo „strateških nastajajočih industrij“ ter trditvijo, da načrti ne bi bili pravno zavezujoči, sklicuje na obrazložitve v uvodnih izjavah od (232) do (234).
It further notes that the GOC has failed to submit these documents and discuss them with the Commission, and that there is no evidence on the record proving that the Commission conclusions are incorrect.
Nadalje navaja, da kitajska vlada ni predložila teh dokumentov in razpravljala o njih s Komisijo ter da ni zabeleženih dokazov o nepravilnosti sklepov Komisije.
The GOC and one sampled exporter claim that the rebates and grants for the payment of export credit insurance premia granted by the local authorities have been illegally countervailed because it has not been established that they constitute subsidies within the meaning of the WTO SCM Agreement.
Kitajska vlada in en vzorčeni izvoznik trdita, da so rabati in nepovratna sredstva za plačilo premij za zavarovanje izvoznih kreditov, ki so jih odobrili lokalni organi, nezakonito izravnani, ker ni dokazano, da se v smislu Sporazuma o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih STO štejejo kot subvencije.
The Commission refers to its analysis on the findings of the investigation and in particular to recitals (239) and (247).
Komisija se sklicuje na svojo analizo ugotovitev preiskave ter zlasti na uvodni izjavi (239) in (247).
The Commission further notes that the rebates and grants are inextricably interlinked with the export credit insurance programme because their repayment is the consequence of the payment of the premium to Sinosure under the main export credit insurance policy.
Komisija nadalje navaja, da so rabati in nepovratna sredstva nerazdružljivo povezani s programom zavarovanja izvoznih kreditov, ker je njihovo odplačilo posledica plačila premije družbi Sinosure v okviru glavne police zavarovanja izvoznih kreditov.
Last but not least, these rebates also fall under the scope of the Notice [2004] No. 368 issued jointly by MOFCOM and Sinosure, which provides that ‘the regional and local government authorities shall jointly make further effort to implement further support measures to the products included in the Directory and the high and new technological enterprises for export credit insurance’.
Nenazadnje ti rabati spadajo tudi na področje uporabe Obvestila [2004] št. 368, ki sta ga izdala MOFCOM in družba Sinosure in ki določa, da „si regionalni in lokalni organi skupaj dodatno prizadevajo za izvajanje nadaljnjih podpornih ukrepov za izdelke, vključene v imenik, ter visokotehnološka podjetja in podjetja z novo tehnologijo za zavarovanje izvoznih kreditov“.
The GOC also challenge the finding concerning Item (j) of Annex 1 of the WTO SCM Agreement that Sinosure short-term export credit insurance programme was operated at premium rates inadequate to cover the long-term operating costs and losses of the programme.
Kitajska vlada tudi izpodbija ugotovitev v zvezi s točko (j) Priloge 1 Sporazuma o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih STO, da premijske stopnje programa kratkoročnega zavarovanja izvoznih kreditov družbe Sinosure niso zadoščale za kritje dolgoročnih stroškov poslovanja in izgub programa.
In support of this the GOC cites the jurisprudence of the WTO Panel finding in US-Upland Cotton and presents explanations based on different sets of figures and arguments contained in Sinosure Annual Reports.
Kitajska vlada to podpre z navajanjem sodne prakse ugotovitve odbora STO v primeru ZDA – gorski bombaž in predstavitvijo obrazložitev na podlagi različnih nizov številk in argumentov iz letnih poročil družbe Sinosure.
The GOC also questions the Commission reference to Article 11 of Sinosure's Articles of Association and to the article from the law firm Stewart Law.
Kitajska vlada ima tudi pomisleke glede sklicevanja Komisije na člen 11 statuta družbe Sinosure in na članek odvetniške pisarne Stewart Law.
The Commission restates all of its arguments in recitals (242) — (245) and recalls that its conclusions are based on the best available evidence in the file due to the lack of cooperation of the GOC which prevented the Commission from obtaining the relevant information it had asked for.
Komisija znova navede vse svoje argumente v uvodnih izjavah od (242) do (245) in opozarja, da njeni sklepi temeljijo na najboljših razpoložljivih dokazih iz spisa, saj zaradi pomanjkljivega sodelovanja kitajske vlade ni uspela pridobiti ustreznih podatkov, za katere je zaprosila.
For its findings, the Commission considered a number of elements and evidence on file, among which were Sinosure's Article of Association and the article from the law firm Stewart Law.
Komisija je pri oblikovanju ugotovitev proučila veliko elementov in dokazov v spisu, vključno s statutom družbe Sinosure in člankom odvetniške pisarne Stewart Law.
The Commission considers that, while none of these elements is determinant in itself, these and all the other elements are relevant for its determination.
Komisija meni, da, čeprav ti elementi niso odločilni sami po sebi, so skupaj z vsemi drugimi elementi pomembni za oblikovanje ugotovitve.
As for the US-Upland Cotton jurisprudence, the Commission has fully taken it into account in its findings and the quotes of this jurisprudence from the GOC are indeed very pertinent.
Kar zadeva sodno prakso iz primera ZDA – gorski bombaž, jo je Komisija v svojih ugotovitvah v celoti upoštevala, navajanje te sodne prakse s strani kitajske vlade pa je dejansko zelo umestno.
In challenging the Commission analysis in recital (245), the GOC submits a table with figures taken from the Income Statement of Sinosure's publicly available Annual Reports for the period 2006-2011 and concludes that it is evident that the premiums received were higher than the operating costs of the programme.
Kitajska vlada pri izpodbijanju analize Komisije v uvodni izjavi (245) predloži tabelo s podatki iz izkaza poslovnega izida iz javno dostopnih letnih poročil družbe Sinosure za obdobje 2006–2011 in sklene, da je očitno, da so prejete premije bile višje od stroškov poslovanja programa.
First, the Commission notes that the table provided by the GOC does not include in the relevant row concerning amounts of the commissions paid by Sinosure but only the operating expenses.
Prvič, Komisija ugotavlja, da tabela, ki jo je predložila kitajska vlada, v zadevni vrstici ne vključuje zneskov provizij, ki jih je plačala družba Sinosure, ampak samo odhodke iz poslovanja.
Second, the figures indisputably show that in each single year from 2006 until 2011 with the exception of 2010 the amounts of net premium are never higher than the amounts of the net claims plus the operating expenses, even ignoring the payments of commissions which have been omitted by the GOC.
Drugič, podatki nesporno kažejo, da v vsakem posameznem letu od 2006 do 2011, razen leta 2010, zneski neto premij niso nikoli višji od vsote zneskov neto terjatev in odhodkov iz poslovanja, tudi če ne upoštevamo plačil provizij, ki jih kitajska vlada ni navedla.
This includes the year 2011, which partly covers the investigation period, and the amount of the loss is quite substantial in certain years (e.g. 2008).
To vključuje leto 2011, ki delno pokriva obdobje preiskave, znesek izgube pa je v posameznih letih (npr. 2008) precej visok.
According to US-Upland Cotton as quoted by the GOC itself, ‘the reference to “long-term” in item (j) to refer to a period of sufficient duration as to ensure an objective examination which allows a thorough appraisal of the programme and which avoids attributing overdue significance to any unique or atypical experiences on a given day, month, trimester, half-year, year or other specific time period’.
V skladu s primerom ZDA – gorski bombaž, kot navaja kitajska vlada, „sklic na ‚dolgoročno‘ v točki (j) pomeni dovolj dolgo obdobje za zagotovitev objektivne preiskave, ki omogoča temeljito oceno programa in ki ne pripisuje prevelike pomembnosti poljubnim edinstvenim ali neznačilnim izkušnjam na določen dan, mesec, trimesečje, polletje, leto ali drugo določeno obdobje“.
The Commission considers the period 2006-2011 as a sufficiently long-term period to consider, and Sinosure has incurred a loss in each year of this period.
Komisija meni, da je obdobje 2006–2011 dovolj dolgoročno za obravnavo. Družba Sinosure je imela izgubo v vsakem letu tega obdobja.
The situation of 2010 is either to be considered unique or atypical if one takes into account the adjusted figures in the 2011 Annual Report and thus of limited significance, or the ordinary unadjusted figures in the 2010 Annual Report must be taken into account as relevant which show that the result is just slightly above break-even.
Stanje iz leta 2010 je treba obravnavati kot edinstveno ali neznačilno, če se upoštevajo popravljene številke v letnem poročilu za leto 2011, in zato kot manj pomembno, ali pa je treba kot ustrezne upoštevati običajne nepopravljene številke v letnem poročilu za leto 2010, ki kažejo, da je rezultat tik nad pragom dobička.
The other tables and sets of figures submitted by the GOC to challenge the Commission findings on item (j) WTO SCM Agreement cannot be reconciled with other information present on the record and/or are not verifiable, In any event, they do not by themselves demonstrate that Sinosure broke even on its short-term export credit insurance programme during the period 2006-2011.
V nobenem primeru sami po sebi ne dokazujejo, da je družba Sinosure v obdobju 2006–2011 s programom kratkoročnega zavarovanja izvoznih kreditov poslovala na pragu dobička.
As for the benchmark for the calculation of the benefit, the GOC considers the establishment of an out-of-country benchmark inconsistent with the SCM Agreement, but it does not add any argument to justify this claim.
Glede referenčne vrednosti za izračun ugodnosti kitajska vlada meni, da je uvedba zunanje referenčne vrednosti neskladna s Sporazumom o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih, vendar ne navede nobenega argumenta za utemeljitev te trditve.
The Commission refers to its explanation in recital (245).
Komisija se sklicuje na svojo obrazložitev v uvodni izjavi (245).
The GOC and one sampled cooperating exporter challenge the benchmark used in that the Commission has not justified why: (i) the premium calculation is based on US EXIM bank data; (ii) it has used Italy as the importing country and not Germany, which is the main export market for the product concerned; (iii) it has taken the time period of 120 days and not 60 days or any other shorter period; (iv) it has not used the premium calculation for direct exports but rather for the Financial Institution Buyer Credit (FIBC) Export Insurance.
Kitajska vlada in en vzorčeni sodelujoči izvoznik izpodbijata uporabljeno referenčno vrednost, ker Komisija ni utemeljila, zakaj: (i) izračun premij temelji na podatkih ameriške banke EXIM; (ii) je kot državo uvoznico uporabila Italijo in ne Nemčije, ki je glavni izvozni trg za zadevni izdelek; (iii) je uporabila 120-dnevno obdobje in ne 60-dnevnega ali krajšega; (iv) ni uporabila izračuna premij za neposredni izvoz, ampak za izvozno zavarovanje FIBC (Financial Institution Buyer Credit).
With regard to (i), the Commission refers to recital (253).
Glede točke (i) se Komisija sklicuje na uvodno izjavo (253).
With respect to (ii), the Commission believes that Italy represents the right balance between the EU country with the lowest risk and EU countries with significantly higher risks and consequently premia charged, which are also markets for the product concerned.
Glede točke (ii) Komisija meni, da je Italija dober primer povprečja med državami EU z najmanjšim tveganjem in državami EU z znatno večjim tveganjem ter posledično zaračunanimi premijami, ki so tudi trgi za zadevni izdelek.
As for (iii), in the absence of a specific simulation based on a period of 90 days available on the EXIM Bank website the Commission considers the duration of 120 days as the most appropriate to represent the terms of sales during the investigation period.
Glede točke (iii), ker ne obstaja posebna simulacija na podlagi 90-dnevnega obdobja, ki je na voljo na spletnem mestu banke EXIM, Komisija meni, da je 120-dnevno obdobje najprimernejše za ponazoritev prodajnih pogojev v obdobju preiskave.
With regard to (iv), the Commission was not able to obtain a simulation for the calculation of the premium for direct exports and considers this benchmark to reflect the general risk situation in the country of purchase.
Glede točke (iv) Komisija ni uspela dobiti simulacije za izračun premij za neposredni izvoz in meni, da ta referenčna vrednost izraža splošno stanje glede tveganja v državi nakupa.
One sampled cooperating exporter claims that it has purchased export credit insurance for some of its exports but it has paid regular insurance premia and did not enjoy the Green Express programme or any other beneficial treatment alleged by the complaint.
En vzorčeni sodelujoči izvoznik trdi, da je kupil zavarovanje izvoznih kreditov za nekaj svojih izvozov, vendar je plačal običajno zavarovalno premijo in ni bil deležen ugodnosti v okviru programa Green Express ali druge ugodne obravnave, navedene v pritožbi.
In the absence of evidence proving this claim, the Commission refers to its findings on this programme in Section 3.4.1.4 if this regulation.
Komisija se ob neobstoju dokazov za to trditev sklicuje na svoje ugotovitve o tem programu v oddelku 3.4.1.4 te uredbe.
As regards ‘Green Express’, the Commission refers to its findings in recital (240) and notes that this constitutes a specific aspect of Sinosure's short-term credit insurance programme and that the Commission findings are not limited to this aspect but to the programme as a whole.
Kar zadeva program „Green Express“, se Komisija sklicuje na svoje ugotovitve v uvodni izjavi (240) in ugotavlja, da je to poseben vidik programa kratkoročnega zavarovanja kreditov družbe Sinosure ter da ugotovitve Komisije niso omejene na ta vidik, ampak na program kot celoto.
The GOC further argues that this programme provides grants for ‘distributed solar PV systems’ rather than for the producers/exporters of the product concerned and that the relevant criteria in the legislation are not directed to module and cell producers.
Kitajska vlada nadalje trdi, da ta program zagotavlja nepovratna sredstva za „dobavljene solarne fotonapetostne sisteme“ in ne za proizvajalce/izvoznike zadevnega izdelka ter da zadevna merila v zakonodaji niso usmerjena na proizvajalce modulov in celic.
In this respect the GOC claims to have provided the relevant documentation on the programme and that even coordinated with the sampled companies to prove this point.
Kitajska vlada v zvezi s tem trdi, da je predložila ustrezno dokumentacijo o programu in da se je celo uskladila z vzorčenimi družbami, da bi to dokazala.