natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The temporary reintroduction of border control at certain internal borders under a specific Union-level procedure could also be justified in the case of exceptional circumstances and as a measure of last resort where the overall functioning of the area without internal border control is put at risk as a result of persistent serious deficiencies relating to external border control identified in the context of a rigorous evaluation process in accordance with Articles 14 and 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013, where those circumstances would constitute a serious threat to public policy or internal security in that area or in parts thereof.
Začasna ponovna uvedba nadzora na določenih notranjih mejah, izvedena na podlagi posebnega postopka na ravni Unije, bi lahko bila utemeljena tudi v primeru izrednih okoliščin in kot skrajni ukrep, kadar je ogroženo splošno delovanje območja brez nadzora na notranjih mejah zaradi trajnih resnih pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z nadzorom na zunanjih mejah, ugotovljenih v okviru strogega ocenjevalnega postopka v skladu s členoma 14 in 15 Uredbe (EU) št. 1053/2013, kadar bi te okoliščine resno ogrožale javni red ali notranjo varnost na tem območju ali delu tega območja.
Such a specific procedure for the temporary reintroduction of border control at certain internal borders could also be triggered, under the same conditions, as a result of the serious negligence by the evaluated Member State of its obligations.
Takšen poseben postopek za začasno ponovno uvedbo nadzora na določenih notranjih mejah bi se pod enakimi pogoji lahko začel tudi takrat, ko ocenjevana država članica hudo zanemarja svoje obveznosti.
In view of the politically sensitive nature of such measures which touch on national executive and enforcement powers regarding internal border control, implementing powers to adopt recommendations under that specific Union-level procedure should be conferred on the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission.
Zaradi politične občutljivosti takšnih ukrepov, ki se nanašajo na nacionalne izvršne in izvršilne pristojnosti glede nadzora na notranjih mejah, bi bilo treba izvedbena pooblastila za sprejetje priporočil po tem posebnem postopku na ravni Unije prenesti na Svet, ki ukrepa na predlog Komisije.
Before any recommendation on the temporary reintroduction of border control at certain internal borders is adopted, the possibility of resorting to measures aiming to address the underlying situation, including assistance by Union bodies, offices or agencies, such as the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (‘Frontex’), established by Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 [4], or the European Police Office (‘Europol’), established by Council Decision 2009/371/JHA [5], and technical or financial support measures at national level, Union level, or both, should be fully explored in a timely manner.
Preden se sprejme priporočilo o začasni ponovni uvedbi nadzora na določenih notranjih mejah, bi bilo treba pravočasno v celoti preučiti vse možnosti uporabe ukrepov za reševanje nastalih razmer, tudi prek pomoči organov, uradov in agencij Unije, kot sta Evropska agencija za upravljanje operativnega sodelovanja na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije (Frontex), ustanovljena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2007/2004 [4], ali Evropski policijski urad (Europol), ustanovljen s Sklepom Sveta 2009/371/PNZ [5], ter ukrepov tehnične in finančne pomoči na nacionalni ravni, ravni Unije ali na obeh ravneh.
Where a serious deficiency is detected, the Commission may provide financial support measures to help the Member State concerned.
Kadar so ugotovljene resne pomanjkljivosti, Komisija lahko zagotovi ukrepe finančne pomoči, s katerimi pomaga zadevni državi članici.
Moreover, any Commission and Council recommendation should be based on substantiated information.
Vsa priporočila Komisije in Sveta bi morala temeljiti na potrjenih informacijah.
The Commission should have the possibility to adopt immediately applicable implementing acts where, in duly justified cases relating to the need to prolong border control at internal borders, imperative grounds of urgency so require.
Komisija bi morala imeti možnost sprejeti izvedbene akte, ki se uporabljajo takoj, kadar je to potrebno iz izredno nujnih razlogov v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih v zvezi s potrebo po podaljšanju nadzora na notranjih mejah.
The evaluation reports and the recommendations referred to in Articles 14 and 15 of Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 should form the basis for the triggering of the specific measures in the case of serious deficiencies relating to external border control and of the specific procedure in case of exceptional circumstances putting the overall functioning of the area without internal border control at risk provided for in this Regulation.
Ocenjevalna poročila in priporočila iz členov 14 in 15 Uredbe (EU) št. 1053/2013 bi morala biti podlaga za uvedbo posebnih ukrepov v primeru resnih pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z nadzorom na zunanjih mejah, in posebnega postopka v primeru izrednih okoliščin, ki ogrožajo splošno delovanje območja brez nadzora na notranjih mejah, kot je določeno v tej uredbi.
The Member States and the Commission jointly conduct regular, objective and impartial evaluations in order to verify the correct application of this Regulation and the Commission coordinates the evaluations in close cooperation with the Member States.
Da bi se prepričale o pravilni uporabi te uredbe, države članice in Komisija skupaj izvajajo redna, objektivna in nepristranska ocenjevanja, ki jih Komisija usklajuje v tesnem sodelovanju z državami članicami.
The evaluation mechanism consists of the following elements: multiannual and annual evaluation programmes, announced and unannounced on-site visits carried out by a small team of Commission representatives and of experts designated by Member States, reports on the outcome of the evaluations adopted by the Commission and recommendations for remedial action adopted by the Council on a proposal from the Commission, appropriate follow-up, monitoring and reporting.
Ocenjevalni mehanizem sestavljajo naslednji elementi: večletni in letni ocenjevalni programi, napovedani in nenapovedani obiski na kraju samem, ki jih opravi manjša skupina predstavnikov Komisije in strokovnjakov, imenovanih s strani držav članic, poročila o izidu ocenjevanja, ki jih sprejme Komisija, in priporočila za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, ki jih Svet sprejme na predlog Komisije, ustrezni nadaljevalni ukrepi, spremljanje in poročanje.
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to provide for common rules on the temporary reintroduction of internal border control in exceptional circumstances, can only be achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 TEU.
Ker se cilj te uredbe, in sicer zagotovitev skupnih pravil o začasni ponovni uvedbi nadzora na notranjih mejah v izrednih razmerah, lahko doseže le na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 PEU.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the TFEU, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is therefore not bound by it or subject to its application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 22) o stališču Danske, ki je priložen PEU in PDEU, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča niti se v njej ne uporablja.
This Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis, in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [6].
Ta uredba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda pri katerem Združeno kraljestvo ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [6].
The United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Združeno kraljestvo torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zanj ni zavezujoča in se v njem ne uporablja.
This Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis, in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [7].
Ta uredba predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda pri katerem Irska ne sodeluje v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske, da sodeluje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [7].
Ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Irska torej ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters' association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [8] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC [9] on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement.
Ta uredba predstavlja za Islandijo in Norveško razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [8], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES [9] o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo navedenega sporazuma.
As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [10] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [11].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Švico razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [10], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2008/146/ES [11].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [12] which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2011/350/EU [13].
Ta uredba predstavlja za Lihtenštajn razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Protokola, podpisanega med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo, Švicarsko konfederacijo in Kneževino Lihtenštajn o pristopu Kneževine Lihtenštajn k Sporazumu med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [12], ki spadajo na področje iz točke A člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 3 Sklepa Sveta 2011/350/EU [13].
As regards Bulgaria and Romania, this Regulation constitutes an act building upon, or otherwise related to, the Schengen acquis within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession.
Za Bolgarijo in Romunijo ta uredba predstavlja akt, ki temelji na schengenskem pravnem redu oziroma je z njim kako drugače povezan v smislu člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2005.
As regards Croatia, this Regulation constitutes an act building upon, or otherwise related to, the Schengen acquis within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the 2011 Act of Accession.
Za Hrvaško ta uredba predstavlja akt, ki temelji na schengenskem pravni redu oziroma je z njim kako drugače povezan v smislu člena 4(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2011.
This Regulation respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including the freedom of movement of persons and of residence.
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, uveljavljena zlasti z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, vključno s svobodo gibanja oseb in prebivanja.
This Regulation must be implemented according to those rights and principles.
To uredbo je treba izvajati v skladu s temi pravicami in načeli.
Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) [14] should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 562/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o Zakoniku Skupnosti o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah) [14] bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 562/2006 se spremeni:
in Title II, the following Chapter is added:
v naslovu II se doda naslednje poglavje:
‘CHAPTER IVa
„POGLAVJE IVa
Specific measures in the case of serious deficiencies relating to external border control
Posebni ukrepi v primeru resnih pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z nadzorom na zunanjih mejah
Measures at external borders and support by the Agency
Ukrepi na zunanjih mejah in podpora agencije
Where serious deficiencies in the carrying out of external border control are identified in an evaluation report drawn up pursuant to Article 14 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013 of 7 October 2013 establishing an evaluation and monitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis, and with a view to ensuring compliance with the recommendations referred to in Article 15 of that Regulation, the Commission may recommend, by means of an implementing act, that the evaluated Member State take certain specific measures, which may include one or both of the following: (a) initiating the deployment of European border guard teams in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004;
Kadar so v ocenjevalnem poročilu, pripravljenem na podlagi člena 14 Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1053/2013 z dne 7. oktobra 2013 o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega in spremljevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda, ugotovljene resne pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju nadzora na zunanjih mejah in da se zagotovi upoštevanje priporočil iz člena 15 navedene uredbe, lahko Komisija ocenjevani državi članici z izvedbenim aktom priporoči, naj sprejme določene posebne ukrepe, ki lahko vključujejo enega ali oba od naslednjih ukrepov: (a) razporeditev skupin Evropskih mejnih policistov v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2007/2004;
submitting its strategic plans, based on a risk assessment, including information on the deployment of personnel and equipment, to the Agency for its opinion thereon.
predložitev strateških načrtov, ki temeljijo na oceni tveganja, vključno z informacijami o razporeditvi osebja in opreme, v presojo agenciji.
That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 33a(2).
Ta izvedbeni akt se sprejme v skladu s postopkom pregleda iz člena 33a(2).
The Commission shall inform the committee established pursuant to Article 33a(1) on a regular basis of the progress in the implementation of the measures referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and on its impact on the deficiencies identified.
Komisija redno obvešča odbor, ustanovljen na podlagi člena 33a(1), o napredku pri izvajanju ukrepov iz odstavka 1 tega člena in njegovem vplivu na ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti.
It shall also inform the European Parliament and the Council.
O tem ustrezno obvešča tudi Evropski parlament in Svet.
Where an evaluation report as referred to in paragraph 1 has concluded that the evaluated Member State is seriously neglecting its obligations and must therefore report on the implementation of the relevant action plan within three months in accordance with Article 16(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013, and where, following that three-month period, the Commission finds that the situation persists, it may trigger the application of the procedure provided for in Article 26 of this Regulation where all the conditions for doing so are fulfilled.
Kadar je v ocenjevalnem poročilu iz odstavka 1 ugotovljeno, da je ocenjevana država članica hudo zanemarjala svoje obveznosti in mora zato v treh mesecih poročati o izvajanju ustreznega akcijskega načrta v skladu s členom 16(4) Uredbe (EU) št. 1053/2013, ter kadar Komisija po preteku trimesečnega obdobja ugotovi, da se stanje ne izboljšuje, lahko začne postopek iz člena 26 te uredbe, kadar so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji za to.
Articles 23 to 27 are replaced by the following:
členi 23 do 27 se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
General framework for the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders
Splošni okvir začasne ponovne uvedbe nadzora na notranjih mejah
Where, in the area without internal border control, there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security in a Member State, that Member State may exceptionally reintroduce border control at all or specific parts of its internal borders for a limited period of up to 30 days or for the foreseeable duration of the serious threat if its duration exceeds 30 days.
Kadar se na območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah pojavi resna grožnja javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti v državi članici, lahko ta država članica izjemoma ponovno uvede nadzor meje na vseh ali določenih delih svoje notranje meje za določeno obdobje do največ 30 dni, ali za čas predvidenega trajanja resne grožnje, če ta traja več kot 30 dni.
Border control at internal borders shall only be reintroduced as a last resort, and in accordance with Articles 24, 25 and 26.
Nadzor na notranjih mejah se ponovno uvede le v skrajnem primeru ter v skladu s členi 24, 25 in 26.
The criteria referred to, respectively, in Articles 23a and 26a shall be taken into account in each case where a decision on the reintroduction of border control at internal borders is considered pursuant, respectively, to Article 24, 25 or 26.
V vsakem primeru, ko se odloča o ponovni uvedbi nadzora na notranjih mejah na podlagi člena 24, 25 oziroma 26, se upoštevajo merila iz člena 23a oziroma 26a.
If the serious threat to public policy or internal security in the Member State concerned persists beyond the period provided for in paragraph 1 of this Article, that Member State may prolong border control at its internal borders, taking account of the criteria referred to in Article 23a and in accordance with Article 24, on the same grounds as those referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and, taking into account any new elements, for renewable periods of up to 30 days.
Če resna grožnja javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti v zadevni državi članici traja dlje kot obdobje iz odstavka 1 tega člena, lahko ta država članica večkrat za obdobje do 30 dni podaljša nadzor na svojih notranjih mejah, ob upoštevanju meril iz člena 23a in v skladu s postopkom iz člena 24, in sicer iz istih razlogov, kot so navedeni v odstavku 1 tega člena, in ob upoštevanju morebitnih novih elementov.
The total period during which border control is reintroduced at internal borders, including any prolongation provided for under paragraph 3 of this Article, shall not exceed six months.
Celotno trajanje ponovno uvedenega nadzora na notranjih mejah, vključno s podaljšanji iz odstavka 3 tega člena, ni daljše od šestih mesecev.
Where there are exceptional circumstances as referred to in Article 26, that total period may be extended to a maximum length of two years, in accordance with paragraph 1 of that Article.
V primeru izrednih okoliščin iz člena 26 se lahko to celotno obdobje podaljša na največ dve leti v skladu s prvim odstavkom navedenega člena.
Criteria for the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders
Merila za začasno ponovno uvedbo nadzora na notranjih mejah
Where a Member State decides, as a last resort, on the temporary reintroduction of border control at one or more of its internal borders or at parts thereof, or decides to prolong such reintroduction, in accordance with Article 23 or Article 25(1), it shall assess the extent to which such a measure is likely to adequately remedy the threat to public policy or internal security, and shall assess the proportionality of the measure in relation to that threat.
Kadar se država članica v skladu s členom 23 ali 25(1) odloči, da v skrajnem primeru začasno ponovno uvede nadzor na eni ali več notranjih mejah ali na njihovih delih, ali da podaljša tako ponovno uvedbo, oceni, v kolikšni meri se lahko s takšnim ukrepom ustrezno odpravi grožnja javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti, ter oceni sorazmernost ukrepa glede na zadevno grožnjo.
In making such an assessment, the Member State shall, in particular, take the following into account:
Pri pripravi take ocene država članica upošteva zlasti naslednje:
the likely impact of any threats to its public policy or internal security, including following terrorist incidents or threats and including those posed by organised crime;
verjetni učinek groženj na njen javni red ali notranjo varnost, tudi po terorističnih napadih ali grožnjah, vključno s tistimi, ki jih predstavlja organiziran kriminal;
the likely impact of such a measure on free movement of persons within the area without internal border control.
verjetni učinek takšnega ukrepa na prosto gibanje oseb v območju brez nadzora na notranjih mejah.
Procedure for the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders under Article 23(1)
Postopek za začasno ponovno uvedbo nadzora na notranjih mejah na podlagi člena 23(1)
Where a Member State plans to reintroduce border control at internal borders under Article 23(1), it shall notify the other Member States and the Commission at the latest four weeks before the planned reintroduction, or within a shorter period where the circumstances giving rise to the need to reintroduce border control at internal borders become known less than four weeks before the planned reintroduction.
Kadar država članica načrtuje ponovno uvedbo nadzora na notranjih mejah na podlagi člena 23(1), o tem najpozneje v štirih tednih pred načrtovano ponovno uvedbo ali v krajšem obdobju, kadar so okoliščine, zaradi katerih je treba ponovno uvesti nadzor na notranjih mejah, znane manj kot štiri tedne pred načrtovano ponovno uvedbo, uradno obvesti ostale države članice in Komisijo.
To that end, the Member State shall supply the following information:
V ta namen jim država članica zagotovi naslednje informacije:
the reasons for the proposed reintroduction, including all relevant data detailing the events that constitute a serious threat to its public policy or internal security;
razloge za predlagano ponovno uvedbo, vključno z vsemi ustreznimi podrobnimi podatki o dogodkih, ki resno ogrožajo njen javni red ali notranjo varnost;
the scope of the proposed reintroduction, specifying at which part or parts of the internal borders border control is to be reintroduced;
obseg predlagane ponovne uvedbe, s posebno navedbo dela ali delov notranjih meja, na katerih je treba ponovno uvesti nadzor meje;
the date and duration of the planned reintroduction;
datum in trajanje načrtovane ponovne uvedbe;