natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The concept of exclusive rights should also be used in the context of determining whether use of a negotiated procedure without prior call for competition would be justified because the works, supplies or services can be supplied only by a particular economic operator because of the protection of certain exclusive rights.
Pojem izključnih pravic bi morali uporabljati tudi pri ugotavljanju, ali bi bilo mogoče uporabo postopka s pogajanji brez predhodnega javnega razpisa upravičiti s tem, da lahko gradnje, blago ali storitve zaradi varstva nekaterih izključnih pravic zagotovi le določen gospodarski subjekt.
However, bearing in mind the different ratio legis behind these provisions, it should be clarified that the notion of exclusive rights does not need to have the same meaning in the two contexts.
Vendar bi bilo treba ob upoštevanju, da je ratio legis teh določb drugačen, pojasniti, da pojem izključnih pravic v obeh primerih nima nujno enakega pomena.
It should thus be clarified that an entity, which has won the exclusive right to provide a given service in a given geographic area following a procedure based on objective criteria for which adequate transparency has been ensured would not, if a private body, be a contracting entity itself, but would, nevertheless, be the only entity that could provide the service concerned in that area.
Torej bi bilo treba pojasniti, da subjekt, ki na podlagi postopka, ki temelji na objektivnih kriterijih in v katerem je bila zagotovljena ustrezna transparentnost, pridobi izključno pravico za opravljanje določene storitve na danem geografskem območju, ne bi bil naročnik, če bi šlo za osebo zasebnega prava, bi pa vseeno bil edini subjekt, ki bi na tem območju lahko opravljal zadevno storitev.
It should therefore be clarified that contracting authorities, public undertakings and private companies, which are active in the heating sector are subject to this Directive, however, in the case of private undertakings, on the additional condition of operating on the basis of special or exclusive rights.
Zato bi bilo treba pojasniti, da za javne naročnike ter javna in zasebna podjetja, dejavna v sektorju ogrevanja, veljajo pravila te direktive, vendar mora biti pri zasebnih podjetjih za uporabo pravil te direktive izpolnjen dodaten pogoj, in sicer da delujejo na podlagi posebnih ali izključnih pravic.
On the other hand, contracting authorities operating in the cooling field are subject to the rules of Directive 2014/24/EU, whereas public undertakings and private undertakings, irrespectively of whether these latter operate on the basis of special or exclusive rights, are not subject to procurement rules.
Na drugi strani pa za javne naročnike, dejavne v sektorju hlajenja, veljajo pravila Direktive 2014/24/EU, za javna in zasebna podjetja pa, ne glede na to, ali delujejo na podlagi posebnih ali izključnih pravic, pravila o javnem naročanju ne veljajo.
It should finally be clarified that contracts awarded for the pursuit of both heating and cooling contracts should be examined under the provisions on contracts for the pursuit of several activities to determine which procurement rules, if any, will govern their award.
Na koncu bi bilo treba pojasniti še, da bi bilo treba javna naročila, oddana za izvajanje pogodb, ki se hkrati nanašajo na ogrevanje in hlajenje, obravnavati v skladu z določbami o javnih naročilih za izvajanje več dejavnosti, na podlagi česar se določi, katera pravila javnega naročanja, če sploh katera, bodo urejala njihovo oddajo.
Before envisaging any change to the scope of this Directive and Directive 2014/24/EU for this sector, the situation of the cooling sector should be examined in order to obtain sufficient information, in particular in respect of the competitive situation, the degree of cross-border procurement and the views of stakeholders.
Pred kakršno koli načrtovano spremembo področja uporabe te direktive in Direktive 2014/24/EU za ta sektor bi bilo treba preučiti položaj sektorja hlajenja, da bi pridobili dovolj informacij, zlasti v zvezi s konkurenčnim položajem, obsegom čezmejnega javnega naročanja in mnenji zainteresiranih strani.
Given that the application of Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and the Council [14] to this sector could have a substantial impact in terms of market-opening, it would be appropriate to conduct the examination when assessing the impact of Directive 2014/23/EU.
Ker bi lahko uporaba Direktive 2014/23/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [14] za ta sektor bistveno vplivala na odpiranje trga, bi bilo ustrezno, da se preučitev opravi pri oceni učinka Direktive 2014/23/EU.
Without in any way extending the scope of this Directive, it should be clarified that production, wholesale and retail sale of electricity are covered when this Directive refers to the supply of electricity.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da v tej direktivi uporabljeni pojem „dobava električne energije“ zajema proizvodnjo, veleprodajo in maloprodajo električne energije, pri čemer to nikakor ne razširja področja uporabe te direktive.
Contracting entities that operate in the drinking water sector may also deal with other activities relating to water, such as projects in the field of hydraulic engineering, irrigation, land drainage or the disposal and treatment of sewage.
Naročniki, ki delujejo v sektorju pitne vode, se lahko ukvarjajo tudi z drugimi dejavnostmi, ki se nanašajo na vodo, kot so projekti na področju vodnega inženirstva, namakanja, osuševanja površin ali odstranjevanja in čiščenja odpadnih voda.
In such case, contracting entities should be able to apply the procurement procedures provided for in this Directive in respect of all their activities relating to water, whichever part of the water cycle is concerned.
V takih primerih bi morali imeti naročniki možnost uporabiti postopke javnega naročanja, določene v tej direktivi, v zvezi z vsemi svojimi dejavnostmi, ki se nanašajo na vodo, ne glede na to, kateri del vodnega cikla zadevajo.
However, procurement rules of the type proposed for supplies of products are inappropriate for purchases of water, given the need to procure water from sources near the area in which it will be used.
Vendar so pravila javnega naročanja v takšni obliki, kakršna se predlaga za dobave blaga, neustrezna za nabavo vode, saj je vodo treba zagotoviti iz virov, ki so blizu območja, na katerem se bo uporabljala.
It is appropriate to exclude procurement made for the purpose of exploring for oil and gas as that sector has consistently been found to be subject to such competitive pressure that the procurement discipline brought about by the Union procurement rules is no longer needed.
Primerno je izključiti javna naročila, namenjena za iskanje nafte in plina, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da je v tem sektorju neprestano prisoten tolikšen konkurenčni pritisk, da disciplina javnega naročanja, ki jo prinašajo pravila Unije o javnem naročanju, ni več potrebna.
As extraction of oil and gas continues to fall within the scope of this Directive, there might be a need to distinguish between exploration and extraction.
Ker črpanje nafte in plina še vedno spada v področje uporabe te direktive, bi bilo morda treba ločiti pojma „iskanje“ in „črpanje“.
In doing so, ‘exploration’ should be considered to include the activities that are undertaken in order to verify whether oil and gas is present in a given zone, and, if so, whether it is commercially exploitable, whereas ‘extraction’ should be considered as the ‘production’ of oil and gas.
Pojem „iskanje“ bi moral vključevati dejavnosti, s katerimi se na danem območju odkrivajo morebitna nahajališča nafte in plina, ter – v takem primeru – za izkoriščanje v komercialne namene, medtem ko bi moralo „črpanje“ pomeniti „proizvodnjo“ nafte in plina.
In line with established practice in merger cases, ‘production’ should be considered also to include ‘development’, i.e. the setting up of adequate infrastructure for future production (oil platforms, pipelines, terminals, etc.).
V skladu z uveljavljeno prakso v primerih združitev bi se moralo šteti, da „proizvodnja“ vključuje tudi „razvoj“, to je vzpostavitev ustrezne infrastrukture za proizvodnjo v prihodnosti (naftne ploščadi, naftovodi, plinovodi, terminali itd.).
Contracting authorities should make use of all possible means at their disposal under national law in order to prevent distortions in procurement procedures stemming from conflicts of interest.
Javni naročniki bi morali uporabiti vsa razpoložljiva sredstva, ki jih imajo po nacionalnem pravu na voljo za preprečevanje izkrivljanj pri izvajanju postopkov naročanja, ki izvirajo iz nasprotij interesov.
This could include procedures in order to identify, prevent and remedy conflicts of interests.
To bi lahko zajemalo postopke za odkrivanje, preprečevanje in odpravljanje nasprotij interesov.
Council Decision 94/800/EC [15], approved in particular the World Trade Organisation Agreement on Government Procurement, (the ‘GPA’).
S Sklepom Sveta 94/800/ES [15] je bil odobren zlasti Sporazum Svetovne trgovinske organizacije o vladnih naročilih (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum GPA).
For contracts covered by Annexes 3, 4 and 5 and the General Notes to the European Union’s Appendix I to the GPA, as well as by other relevant international agreements by which the Union is bound, contracting entities should fulfil the obligations under those agreements by applying this Directive to economic operators of third countries that are signatories to the agreements.
Pri javnih naročilih, zajetih v prilogah 3, 4 in 5 ter splošnih pripombah k Dodatku I (v zvezi z Evropsko unijo) k Sporazumu GPA in v drugih zadevnih mednarodnih sporazumih, ki zavezujejo Unijo, bi morali naročniki obveznosti iz teh sporazumov izpolnjevati tako, da bi to direktivo uporabljali za gospodarske subjekte tretjih držav, ki so podpisnice teh sporazumov.
The GPA applies to contracts above certain thresholds, set in the GPA and expressed as special drawing rights.
Sporazum GPA se uporablja za javna naročila nad v njem določenimi mejnimi vrednostmi in izraženimi kot posebne pravice črpanja.
Provision should also be made for periodic reviews of the thresholds expressed in euro so as to adjust them, by means of a purely mathematical operation, to possible variations in the value of the euro in relation to those special drawing rights.
Treba bi bilo določiti tudi redne revizije mejnih vrednosti, izraženih v eurih, da se z navadno matematično operacijo prilagodijo morebitnim spremembam vrednosti eura glede na te posebne pravice črpanja.
Apart from those periodic mathematical adjustments, an increase in the thresholds set in the GPA should be explored during the next round of negotiations thereof.
Poleg teh rednih matematičnih prilagoditev bi bilo treba v naslednjem krogu pogajanj preučiti možnost zvišanja mejnih vrednosti iz Sporazuma GPA.
To avoid a multiplication of thresholds it is furthermore appropriate, without prejudice to the international commitments of the Union, to continue to apply the same thresholds to all contracting entities, regardless of the sector in which they operate.
Da se prepreči pomnožitev mejnih vrednosti, je poleg tega primerno, brez poseganja v mednarodne obveznosti Unije, še naprej uporabljati enake mejne vrednosti za vse naročnike, ne glede na sektor, v katerem delujejo.
It should be clarified that, for the estimation of the value of a contract, all revenues have to be taken into account, whether received from the contracting entity or from third parties.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da se morajo za ocenitev vrednosti naročila upoštevati vsi prihodki, ne glede na to, ali izvirajo od naročnika ali od tretjih oseb.
It should also be clarified that, for the purpose of estimating the thresholds, the notion of similar supplies should be understood as products which are intended for identical or similar uses, such as supplies of a range of foods or of various items of office furniture.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba tudi, da naj bi za namen ocenitve mejnih vrednosti pojem podobnega blaga razumeli kot proizvode, ki so namenjeni enaki ali podobni uporabi, kot na primer dobava različnih vrst živil ali raznih kosov pisarniškega pohištva.
For the purposes of estimating the value of a given procurement, it should be clarified that it should be allowed to base the estimation of the value on a subdivision of the procurement only where this is justified by objective reasons.
Za namene ocenjevanja vrednosti določenega javnega naročila bi bilo treba pojasniti, da je ocena vrednosti na podlagi razdelitve javnega naročila dopustna zgolj v primeru, ko to upravičujejo objektivni razlogi.
For instance, it could be justified to estimate contract values at the level of a separate operational unit of the contracting entity provided that the unit in question is independently responsible for its procurement.
Lahko bi bilo na primer upravičeno, da se vrednost javnega naročila oceni na ravni ločene organizacijske enote naročnika, če je zadevna enota samostojno odgovorna za javno naročilo.
This can be assumed where the separate operational unit independently runs the procurement procedures and makes the buying decisions, has a separate budget line at its disposal for the procurements concerned, concludes the contract independently and finances it from a budget which it has at its disposal.
To je mogoče domnevati, kadar ločena organizacijska enota samostojno vodi postopke javnega naročanja in sprejema odločitve o nakupu, razpolaga z ločeno proračunsko vrstico za zadevna naročila ter samostojno sklene naročilo, ki ga financira iz proračuna, s katerim razpolaga.
A subdivision is not justified where the contracting entity merely organises a procurement in a decentralised way.
Razdelitev ni upravičena, če naročnik naročanje zgolj decentralizirano organizira.
Being addressed to Member States, this Directive does not apply to procurement carried out by international organisations on their own behalf and for their own account.
Glede na to, da je ta direktiva naslovljena na države članice, se ne uporablja za javna naročila, ki jih izvajajo mednarodne organizacije v svojem imenu in za svoj račun.
There is, however, a need to clarify to what extent this Directive should be applied to procurement governed by specific international rules.
Treba pa je pojasniti, v kakšnem obsegu bi morali to direktivo uporabljati za javna naročila, ki jih urejajo posebni mednarodni predpisi.
It should be clarified that this Directive does not apply to service contracts for the provision of such services, whatever their denomination under national law.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da se ta direktiva ne uporablja za javna naročila za opravljanje takšnih storitev, ne glede na njihovo poimenovanje v nacionalnem pravu.
Such legal services are usually provided by bodies or individuals designated or selected in a manner which cannot be governed by procurement rules, such as for instance the designation of State Attorneys in certain Member States.
Takšne pravne storitve običajno opravljajo organi ali posamezniki, imenovani ali izbrani na način, ki ga ni mogoče urediti s pravili o javnem naročanju, to na primer velja za imenovanje državnih tožilcev v nekaterih državah članicah.
It is appropriate to specify that the notion of financial instruments as referred to in this Directive is given the same meaning as in other internal market legislation and, in view of the recent creation of the European Financial Stability Facility and the European Stability Mechanism, it should be stipulated that operations conducted with that Facility and that Mechanism should be excluded from the scope of this Directive.
Primerno je določiti, da pojem finančnih instrumentov, kakor je naveden v tej direktivi, pomeni isto kot v drugi zakonodaji na področju notranjega trga, ob upoštevanju nedavne ustanovitve Evropskega instrumenta za finančno stabilnost in Evropskega mehanizma za stabilnost pa bi bilo treba določiti, da so posli, izvedeni v okviru navedenega instrumenta in navedenega mehanizma, izključeni iz področja uporabe te direktive.
It should be recalled that Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council [16] explicitly provides that Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC apply, respectively, to service contracts and public service contracts for public passenger transport services by bus or tramway, whereas Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 applies to service concessions for public passenger transport by bus or tramway.
Opozoriti bi bilo treba, da člen 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1370/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [16] izrecno določa, da se direktivi 2004/17/ES in 2004/18/ES uporabljata za pogodbe o storitvah in pogodbe o izvajanju javnih storitev avtobusnega ali tramvajskega javnega potniškega prevoza, medtem ko se Uredba (ES) št. 1370/2007 uporablja za koncesije za storitve avtobusnega ali tramvajskega javnega potniškega prevoza.
It should furthermore be recalled that that Regulation continues to apply to public service contracts as well as to service concessions for public passenger transport by rail or metro.
Prav tako bi bilo treba opozoriti, da se navedena uredba še naprej uporablja za pogodbe o izvajanju javnih storitev in za koncesije za storitve javnega potniškega prevoza z železnico ali podzemno železnico.
To clarify the relationship between this Directive and Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007, it should be provided explicitly that this Directive should not be applicable to service contracts for the provision of public passenger transport services by rail or metro, the award of which should continue to be subject to that Regulation.
Da bi pojasnili razmerje med to direktivo in Uredbo (ES) št. 1370/2007, bi bilo treba izrecno določiti, da se ta direktiva ne bi smela uporabljati za pogodbe o izvajanju javnih storitev zaradi opravljanja storitev javnega potniškega prevoza z železnico ali podzemno železnico, za sklepanje katerih bi bilo treba še naprej uporabljati navedeno uredbo.
In so far as Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 leaves it to national law to depart from the rules laid down in that Regulation, Member States should be able to continue to provide in their national law that service contracts for public passenger transport services by rail or metro are to be awarded by a contract award procedure following their general public procurement rules.
Če Uredba (ES) št. 1370/2007 nacionalnemu pravu dopušča, da odstopa od njenih pravil, bi morale imeti države članice v nacionalnem pravu še naprej možnost določiti, da se morajo pogodbe o izvajanju storitev javnega potniškega prevoza z železnico ali podzemno železnico sklepati po postopku, ki je v skladu z njihovimi splošnimi pravili o javnem naročanju.
It should therefore be clarified that services, which are covered by CPV code 85143000-3, consisting exclusively of patient transport ambulance services should be subject to the special regime set out for social and other specific services (the ‘light regime’); Consequently, mixed contracts for the provision of ambulance services in general would also be subject to the light regime if the value of the patient transport ambulance services were greater than the value of other ambulance services.
Pojasniti bi bilo torej treba, da bi morala za storitve, ki so zajete s kodo CPV 85143000-3, pri katerih gre izključno za prevoz bolnikov z reševalnimi vozili, veljati posebna ureditev, določena za socialne in druge storitve (v nadaljnjem besedilu: enostavnejša ureditev) Posledično bi enostavnejša ureditev veljala tudi za mešana javna naročila za opravljanje storitev reševalnih vozil na splošno, če bi bila vrednost storitev za prevoz bolnikov z reševalnimi vozili višja od vrednosti drugih storitev reševalnih vozil;
It should be clarified that this Directive need not apply to the award of service contracts to that contracting authority or association.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da se ta direktiva ne uporablja za oddajo javnih naročil storitev takemu javnemu naročniku ali združenju javnih naročnikov.
There is considerable legal uncertainty as to how far contracts concluded between contracting authorities should be covered by public procurement rules.
Obstaja precejšnja pravna negotovost glede vprašanja, v kolikšni meri bi morale biti pogodbe o izvedbi javnega naročila, sklenjene med javnimi naročniki, zajete v pravilih o javnem naročanju.
As that case-law would be equally applicable to public authorities when operating in the sectors covered by this directive, it is appropriate to ensure that the same rules apply and are interpreted in the same way in both this Directive and Directive 2014/24/EU.
Glede na to, da naj bi se ta sodna praksa uporabljala tudi za javne organe, kadar delujejo v sektorjih, zajetih v tej direktivi, je primerno zagotoviti, da se v tej direktivi in Direktivi 2014/24/EU uporabljajo ista pravila, ki naj se v obeh razlagajo enako.
Many contracting entities are organised as an economic group which may comprise a series of separate undertakings; often each of these undertakings has a specialised role in the overall context of the economic group.
Mnogi naročniki so organizirani kot gospodarska skupina, ki lahko združuje več posameznih podjetij; pogosto imajo posamezna podjetja točno določeno vlogo v okviru gospodarske skupine.
It is therefore appropriate to exclude certain service, supply and works contracts awarded to an affiliated undertaking having as its principal activity the provision of such services, supply or works to the group of which it is part, rather than offering them on the market.
Zato je primerno izključiti določena javna naročila storitev, blaga in gradenj, ki se oddajo povezanemu podjetju, katerega glavna dejavnost je zagotavljanje teh storitev, blaga ali gradenj skupini, katere del je, in ne njihovo ponujanje na trgu.
It is also appropriate to exclude certain service, supply and works contracts awarded by a contracting entity to a joint venture which is formed by a number of contracting entities for the purpose of carrying out activities covered by this Directive and of which that entity is part.
Primerno je tudi, da se izključijo določena javna naročila storitev, blaga in gradenj, ki jih naročnik odda skupnemu podjetju, katerega del je in ki ga je ustanovilo več naročnikov za opravljanje dejavnosti iz te direktive.
However, it is appropriate to ensure that this exclusion does not give rise to distortions of competition to the benefit of the undertakings or joint ventures that are affiliated with the contracting entities; it is appropriate to provide a suitable set of rules, in particular as regards the maximum limits within which the undertakings may obtain a part of their turnover from the market and above which they would lose the possibility of being awarded contracts without calls for competition, the composition of joint ventures and the stability of links between those joint ventures and the contracting entities of which they are composed.
Vendar je primerno zagotoviti, da ta izključitev ne povzroči izkrivljanja konkurence v korist podjetij ali skupnih podjetij, ki so povezana z naročniki; primerno je zagotoviti ustrezen sklop pravil, zlasti z zgornjo mejo, v okviru katere lahko podjetja ustvarijo del svojega prometa na trgu ter nad katero bi izgubila možnost, da se jim javna naročila oddajo brez javnih razpisov, ter za sestavo skupnih podjetij in trdnost povezav med temi skupnimi podjetji in naročniki, ki jih sestavljajo.
It is also appropriate to clarify interaction of the provisions on cooperation between public authorities and the provisions on the award of contracts to affiliated undertakings or in the context of joint ventures.
Primerno je tudi pojasniti razmerja med določbami o sodelovanju med javnimi organi in določbami o oddaji javnih naročil povezanim podjetjem ali v okviru skupnih podjetij.