natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The sampled group of companies account for almost 64 % of the declared export sales to the Union, and are located in two different regions.
Podjetja iz vzorčene skupine predstavljajo skoraj 64 % prijavljenega izvoza v Unijo in se nahajajo v dveh različnih regijah.
In accordance with Article 27(2) of the basic Regulation, all known exporting producers concerned, and the Turkish authorities were consulted on the selection of the sample.
V skladu s členom 27(2) osnovne uredbe so bila z vsemi znanimi zadevnimi proizvajalci izvozniki in turškimi organi opravljena posvetovanja o izbiri vzorca.
One company contested the selection of sampled companies and claimed that it should be included in the sample.
Eno podjetje je izpodbijalo izbor vzorčenih podjetij in trdilo, da bi moralo biti vključeno v vzorec.
It argued that it exclusively produces, processes and sells trout (that is to say it does not have any other activities), and has been doing so since 1971, making it the first producer of the product concerned in Turkey.
Zatrjevalo je, da izključno proizvaja, predeluje in prodaja postrvi (tj. da ne opravlja drugih dejavnosti) že od leta 1971, kar pomeni, da je bilo prvi proizvajalec zadevnega izdelka v Turčiji.
It further claimed that it has substantial sales on the domestic market and finally, that it was the biggest producer in the Marmara region.
Poleg tega je trdilo, da ima znaten obseg prodaje na domačem trgu, in še, da je največji proizvajalec v regiji Marmara.
The Commission recalls that the selection of sampled companies was made on the basis of the largest quantities of volumes in accordance with Article 27(1) of the basic Regulation taking into account the number of producers that could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Komisija opozarja, da so bila vzorčena podjetja izbrana na podlagi največjega obsega v skladu s členom 27(1) osnovne uredbe ob upoštevanju števila proizvajalcev, ki ga je mogoče v razpoložljivem času ustrezno preiskati.
As the proposed sample represents 64 % of the exports of the product concerned to the Union, such a sample is representative of the situation of the Turkish industry.
Glede na to, da predlagani vzorec predstavlja 64 % izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Unijo, je tak vzorec reprezentativen za položaj turške industrije.
Furthermore, the sampled companies are situated in two different regions (out of three represented) which is considered sufficient for the purpose of the investigation.
Poleg tega se vzorčena podjetja nahajajo v dveh različnih regijah (od treh zastopanih), kar za namene preiskave zadošča.
Therefore, the Commission maintains that the sampled companies correspond to the largest representative volumes of imports which could be reasonably investigated within the time available.
Zato Komisija meni, da vzorčena podjetja ustrezajo največjemu reprezentativnemu obsegu uvoza, ki ga je bilo mogoče ustrezno preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
Eleven companies or groups of companies requested individual examination under Article 27(3) of the basic Regulation.
Enajst podjetij ali skupin podjetij je zahtevalo individualno preiskavo na podlagi člena 27(3) osnovne uredbe.
At this stage of the investigation, the Commission has not taken any decision about the request for individual examination.
Komisija v tej fazi preiskave ni sprejela nobene odločitve glede zahtev po individualni preiskavi.
The Commission will decide whether to grant individual examination at the definitive stage of the investigation.
V končni fazi preiskave bo odločila, ali bo odobrila individualne preiskave.
Replies to the questionnaire
Odgovori na vprašalnik
The Commission sent questionnaires to the GOT, to all sampled companies in the Union, three importers and to the sampled groups of exporting producers in Turkey.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike turški vladi, vsem vzorčenim podjetjem v Uniji, trem uvoznikom in vzorčenim skupinam proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Turčiji.
Three companies within a group of Turkish exporting producers requested an exemption from the obligation to provide a questionnaire reply.
Tri podjetja v skupini turških proizvajalcev izvoznikov so zahtevala izvzetje iz obveznosti predložitve odgovorov na vprašalnik.
One of these companies argued that it was mainly active in production of seabass and seabream and it only produces a small volume of product concerned.
Eno od teh podjetij je trdilo, da je bilo v glavnem dejavno v proizvodnji brancinov in orad ter proizvaja samo majhen obseg zadevnega izdelka.
One company is running a small supermarket and is only marginally involved with the product concerned, and one company was a related importer who did not have important sales of the product concerned in the investigation period.
Drugo podjetje upravlja majhno samopostrežno trgovino in se z zadevnim izdelkom ukvarja le kot z obrobno dejavnostjo, tretje podjetje pa je bil povezani uvoznik, ki v obdobju preiskave ni imel znatne prodaje zadevnega izdelka.
The Commission decided to exempt the company running the small supermarket from the obligation to fill in the questionnaire response.
Komisija se je odločila, da podjetje, ki upravlja majhno samopostrežno trgovino, izvzame iz obveznosti predložitve odgovorov na vprašalnik.
However, it maintained its position that the company mainly active in production of seabass and seabream had to fill in the questionnaire as well as the related importer since the volumes produced (in case of the exporting producer) or traded (in case of the related importer) were still important.
Vendar pa je vztrajala pri stališču, da morata podjetje, dejavno predvsem v proizvodnji brancinov in orad, ter povezani uvoznik izpolniti vprašalnik, ker je obseg proizvodnje (v primeru proizvajalca izvoznika) ali obseg trgovine (v primeru povezanega uvoznika) še vedno znaten.
Questionnaire replies were received from the GOT and all of the other sampled groups of exporting producers in Turkey and the companies asking for individual examination.
Komisija je prejela izpolnjene vprašalnike od turške vlade, vseh drugih vzorčenih skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Turčiji in podjetij, ki zahtevajo individualno preiskavo.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a provisional determination of subsidy, resulting injury and Union interest.
Komisija je zbrala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdele potrebne za začasno določitev subvencije, nastale škode in interesa Unije.
Verification visits pursuant to Article 26 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Preveritveni obiski v skladu s členom 26 osnovne uredbe so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih podjetij:
Aqualande SAS, Roquefort, France
Aqualande SAS, Roquefort, Francija,
Danaqua, Grindsted, Denmark
Danaqua, Grindsted, Danska,
Danforel A/S, Grindsted, Denmark
Danforel A/S, Grindsted, Danska,
Kongeåns Dambrug ApS, Brørup, Denmark
Kongeåens Dambrug, ApS, Brørup, Danska,
LaFo Forellen GmbH, Oberndorf, Germany
LaFo Forellen GmbH, Oberndorf, Nemčija,
Hofer Forellen GmbH, Oberndorf, Germany
Hofer Forellen GmbH, Oberndorf, Nemčija,
Zakład Hodowli Pstrąga w Zaporze — Mylof, Rytel, Poland
Zakład Hodowli Pstrąga w Zaporze – Mylof, Rytel, Poljska,
Piszolla, S.L., Guadalajara, Spain
Piszolla, S.L., Guadalajara, Španija,
Erede Rossi Silvio Di Rossi Niccola, Sefro, Italy
Erede Rossi Silvio Di Rossi Niccola, Sefro, Italija,
Grupo Tres Mares, S.A., La Coruña, Spain
Grupo Tres Mares, S.A., La Coruña, Španija;
Exporting producers in Turkey
proizvajalci izvozniki v Turčiji:
Group of related companies ‘GMS’, Bodrum, Turkey:
skupina povezanih podjetij „GMS“, Bodrum, Turčija:
Group of related companies ‘Özpekler’, Denizli, Turkey:
skupina povezanih podjetij „Kilic“, Bodrum, Turčija:
Government of Turkey:
skupina povezanih podjetij „Özpekler“, Denizli, Turčija:
(‘Spador’)
Ști („Ternaeben“), Kayseri, Turčija;
Ternäben Service GmbH (‘TSG’),
vlada Turčije:
Ternäben Vertrieb GmbH (‘TVG’)
Ministrstvo za gospodarstvo, Ankara, Turčija,
Union producer (processor) related to exporting producer in Turkey (Ternäben)
Ministrstvo za prehrano, kmetijstvo in živinorejo, Ankara, Turčija;
Ternäben Spółka z.o.o., Poland (‘TPL’)
uvozniki v Uniji, povezani s turškimi izvozniki:
Investigation period and period considered
(„Spador“),
The investigation of subsidy and injury covered the period from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013 (the investigation period).
Ternäben Service GmbH („TSG“),
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2010 to the end of the investigation period (the period considered).
Ternäben Vertrieb GmbH („TVG“);
B. PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
proizvajalec Unije (predelovalec), povezan s proizvajalcem izvoznikom v Turčiji (Ternäben):
Product concerned
Ternäben Spółka z. o.o., Poljska („TPL“).
The product concerned is rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss):
Obdobje preiskave in obravnavano obdobje
live weighing 1,2 kg or less each, or
Preiskava subvencije in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2013 do 31. decembra 2013 („obdobje preiskave“).
fresh, chilled, frozen and/or smoked:
Preiskava trendov, pomembnih za oceno škode, je obsegala obdobje od 1. januarja 2010 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
in the form of whole fish (with heads on), whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1,2 kg or less each, or
B. ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELEK
with heads off, whether or not gilled, whether or not gutted, weighing 1 kg or less each, or
Zadevni izdelek
in the form of fillets weighing 400 g or less each,
Zadevni izdelek je šarenka (Oncorhynchus mykiss):
originating in Turkey and currently falling within the CN codes ex03019190, ex03021180, ex03031490, ex03044290, ex03048290 and ex03054300 (the product concerned).
žive mase 1,2 kg ali manj posamezno ali
As already mentioned in recital 1, the definition of the product concerned was subject to a corrigendum.
sveže, ohlajene, zamrznjene in/ali dimljene:
The correction was purely editorial and the scope was not affected.
v obliki cele ribe (z glavo), s škrgami ali brez njih, z drobovjem ali brez njega, mase 1,2 kg ali manj posamezno ali
Like product
brez glave, s škrgami ali brez njih, z drobovjem ali brez njega, mase 1 kg ali manj posamezno, ali
The investigation showed that the product produced and sold on the Turkish domestic market and/or exported to the Union and the product produced and sold in the Union by the Union industry have the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics and the same basic uses.
v obliki filetov mase 400 g ali manj posamezno,
The Commission decided at this stage that those products are therefore like products within the meaning of Article 2(c) of the basic Regulation.
s poreklom iz Turčije, ki je trenutno uvrščena pod oznake KN ex03019190, ex03021180, ex03031490, ex03044290, ex03048290 in ex03054300 („zadevni izdelek“).
Claims regarding the product scope
Kot navedeno v uvodni izjavi 1, je bila opredelitev zadevnega izdelka predmet popravka.
Some interested parties claimed that smoked trout should be excluded from the product scope.
Popravek je bil izključno redakcijski in ni vplival na obseg izdelka.
According to these parties there were differences in the production process and differences in physical, technical and chemical characteristics when compared to non-smoked trout.
Podobni izdelek
Furthermore, the Turkish authorities claimed that the cost structure of smoked fillets producers was significantly different from the cost structure of other producers which would indicate that smoked and non-smoked products were not a single product.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imata izdelek, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu Turčije in/ali se izvaža v Unijo, ter izdelek, ki ga v Uniji proizvaja in prodaja industrija Unije, enake osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemične lastnosti ter enako osnovno uporabo.
Finally, these parties referred to two prior anti-dumping investigations concerning similar products (large rainbow trout and salmon) concluded in 2004 [5] and 2005 [6] respectively where smoked products were outside the product scope.
Komisija se je v tej fazi odločila, da sta ta izdelka zato podobna izdelka v smislu člena 2(c) osnovne uredbe.
The parties referred in particular to recital 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 437/2004 [7] where it would be acknowledged that the process of smoking would alter the basic characteristics of the product in question.
Trditve v zvezi z obsegom izdelka
On this basis smoked trout should be excluded from the product scope in the current investigation.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da bi bilo treba dimljeno postrv izključiti iz obsega izdelka.
The investigation showed that the various presentations — ‘ive’, ‘chilled’, ‘frozen’ or ‘smoked’ — covered by the definition of the product concerned share the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics.
Po navedbah teh strani se ta od nedimljene postrvi razlikuje v proizvodnem procesu ter fizikalnih, tehničnih in kemičnih značilnostih.
In particular, all trout had the same intrinsic qualities (chemical, nutritional or other) and the processing did not deprive the fish therefrom, but resulted only in different presentations which were merely different means of preserving the fish before further processing, preparation, cooking or consumption.
Poleg tega so turški organi trdili, da se stroškovna struktura proizvajalcev dimljenih filetov znatno razlikuje od stroškovne strukture drugih proizvajalcev, kar bi lahko pomenilo, da dimljeni in nedimljeni izdelki niso en sam izdelek.
Therefore, it was concluded that conservation by smoking does not materially alter the basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics of the product.
Nazadnje, te strani so se sklicevale na dve predhodni protidampinški preiskavi v zvezi s podobnimi izdelki (veliko amerikanko in lososom), ki sta bili zaključeni leta 2004 [5] in 2005 [6], v okviru katerih so bili dimljeni izdelki obravnavani zunaj obsega izdelka.
Regarding different production processes and different cost structures, the parties did not explain how this could have had an impact on the conclusion that smoked and non-smoked products were a single product.
Strani so se sklicevale predvsem na uvodno izjavo 9 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 437/2004 [7], ki naj bi potrjevala, da proces dimljenja spremeni osnovne značilnosti zadevnega izdelka.
In any event, any possible difference in production processes has as such no impact on the definition of the product scope.
Na tej podlagi bi bilo treba v sedanji preiskavi dimljene postrvi izključiti iz obsega izdelka.
Furthermore, in this specific case, the production process and cost structure of smoked fillets were in fact not significantly different from the production process and cost structure of other presentations of trout.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo različne predstavitve zadevnega izdelka, kot je „živ“, „ohlajen“, „zamrznjen“ ali „dimljen“, ki so zajete z opredelitvijo zadevnega izdelka, enake osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemične značilnosti.
The main cost element of each presentation was farming cost, consisting essentially of feed (fishmeal and fish oil), energy cost and the cost of eggs or juveniles.
Zlasti so imele vse postrvi enake bistvene značilnosti (kemične, prehranske ali druge), ki jih ribe zaradi predelave niso izgubile, posledice predelave pa so se kazale samo v različnih predstavitvah, ki so predstavljale zgolj različne načine konzerviranja rib pred nadaljnjo predelavo, pripravo, kuhanjem ali uživanjem.
The claims made in this regard should therefore be rejected.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da konzerviranje z dimljenjem bistveno ne spremeni osnovnih fizikalnih, tehničnih in kemičnih lastnosti izdelka.
In the previous investigations to which the interested parties referred to, and in contrast to the current investigation, smoked products were not included in the complaint leading to the initiation of these cases.
V zvezi z različnimi proizvodnimi procesi in stroškovnimi strukturami strani niso pojasnile, kakšen vpliv bi imel ta vidik na sklep, da so dimljeni in nedimljeni izdelki en sam izdelek.
Therefore, they were not within the scope of these investigations and consequently not investigated.
V vsakem primeru morebitne razlike v proizvodnih procesih same po sebi nimajo vpliva na opredelitev obsega izdelka.
Recital 9 of Regulation (EC) No 437/2004 addressed a claim by an interested party that frozen whole fish and fillets should be excluded from the proceeding.
Poleg tega se v tem posebnem primeru proizvodni proces in stroškovna struktura pri dimljenih filetih nista bistveno razlikovala od proizvodnega procesa in stroškovne strukture pri drugih predstavitvah postrvi.
However, the investigation did not find or specifically conclude that smoked products should be excluded from the product scope.
Glavni stroškovni element vsake predstavitve so bili stroški gojenja, ki so v glavnem vsebovali stroške krme (ribja moka in ribje olje), porabe energije in stroške iker ali mladic.
On the basis that the current investigation found that all presentations of trout have the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics, this argument should be rejected.
Zato bi bilo treba trditve v zvezi s tem zavrniti.
For the reasons above the claim that the smoked products should be excluded from the scope of the product scope was at this stage rejected.
V predhodnih preiskavah, na katere so se zainteresirane strani sklicevale, v nasprotju s sedanjo preiskavo dimljeni izdelki niso bili vključeni v pritožbo, ki je privedla do začetka postopka.
C. SUBSIDY
Zato niso bili vključeni v obseg teh preiskav in posledično niso bili preiskovani.
Introduction
V uvodni izjavi 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 437/2004 je obravnavana trditev zainteresirane strani, da bi bilo treba zamrznjeno celo ribo in filete izločiti iz postopkov.
The complainant alleged that the GOT is subsidising its aquaculture sector.
Vendar pa v preiskavi ni bilo ugotovljeno ali posebej sklenjeno, da bi bilo treba dimljene izdelke izključiti iz obsega izdelka.
The complaint contained prima facie evidence for several subsidy practices included in both legislation and a number of policy documents which are the basis for the state support of the sector.
Na podlagi ugotovitve v okviru sedanje preiskave, in sicer da imajo vse predstavitve postrvi enake osnovne fizikalne, tehnične in kemične lastnosti, bi bilo treba to trditev zavrniti.
The Commission reviewed and analysed the documents provided in the complaint as well as additional documents submitted by the GOT and by sampled exporting producers in the course of the investigation and found that all of these documents show that the aquaculture sector in the Republic of Turkey receives preferential treatment in many areas.
Iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov je bila trditev, da bi bilo treba dimljene izdelke izločiti iz obsega izdelka, v tej fazi zavrnjena.
The decision by the Turkish authorities to subsidize specifically the aquaculture sector dates back to 2003 and has resulted in large amounts of public money being transferred to Turkish producers and exporters over the last 10 years.
C. SUBVENCIONIRANJE
In the framework of the pre-initiation consultations between the GOT and the Commission, as mentioned in recitals 3 and 4 above, the GOT did not challenge the existence of any of the investigated schemes.
Uvod
Schemes investigated
Pritožnik je trdil, da turška vlada subvencionira sektor akvakulture.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the GOT and the sampled exporting producers, requesting information on the following schemes that allegedly involved the granting of subsidies to the aquaculture industry:
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o več subvencijskih praksah, vključenih v zakonodajo in številne strateške dokumente, ki so podlaga za državno podporo v tem sektorju.
State support to investments made in the aquaculture sector
Komisija je pregledala in analizirala dokumente, navedene v pritožbi, ter dodatne dokumente, ki so jih med preiskavo predložili turška vlada in vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki, ter ugotovila, da je iz vseh teh dokumentov razvidno, da je sektor akvakulture v Republiki Turčiji na mnogih področjih deležen številnih ugodnosti.
Customs duty exemption
Odločitev turških organov, da bodo posebej subvencionirali sektor akvakulture, sega v leto 2003, posledica te odločitve pa je bila dodelitev visokih zneskov javnih sredstev turškim proizvajalcem in izvoznikom v zadnjih desetih letih.
VAT exemption
V okviru posvetovanj med turško vlado in Komisijo pred začetkom preiskave, ki so omenjena v uvodnih izjavah 3 in 4, turška vlada ni izpodbijala obstoja nobene od preiskovanih shem.
Tax reduction
Preiskovane sheme
Social security premium support (employers' contribution)
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala turški vladi in vzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, pri čemer je zahtevala informacije o naslednjih shemah, ki so domnevno vključevale dodeljevanje subvencij industriji akvakulture:
Interest support
državna podpora za naložbe v sektorju akvakulture,
Land allocation
oprostitev plačila carine,
Income tax support
oprostitev plačila DDV,
Social security premium support (employees' contribution)
znižanje davkov,
Direct subsidies granted to producers of trout
prevzem prispevkov (deleža, ki ga plača delodajalec),
Direct subsidies to trout farmers
podpora v obliki subvencioniranih obrestnih mer,
Direct subsidies for the organic production of trout
dodelitev zemljišč,
Specific support for juveniles
podpora pri odmerjanju davka od dohodka,
Subsidised loans and insurance for trout producers
prevzem prispevkov (deleža, ki ga plača delojemalec),
Low-Interest Investment Loans and Business Loans by Ziraat Bankasi
neposredne subvencije za proizvajalce postrvi,
Low-Interest Investment Loans and Business Loans by Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
neposredne subvencije za gojitelje postrvi,
Agricultural Insurance Pool and Premium Support Rates
neposredne subvencije za ekološko proizvodnjo postrvi,
Subsidies for consultancy
posebna podpora za mladice,
Subsidies for fishing vessels
subvencionirana posojila in zavarovanja za proizvajalce postrvi,
Purchase of fuel for fishing boats (Consumption tax rebate on vessel fuel)
ugodne obrestne mere, ki jih je za investicijska posojila in posojila za podjetja omogočila banka Ziraat Bankasi,
Discarding of fishing vessels
ugodne obrestne mere, ki so jih za investicijska posojila in posojila za podjetja omogočile kmetijske kreditne zadruge,
Other subsidies and other subsidy programmes
Kmetijski zavarovalni sklad in podpora v obliki stopenj premij
State support to investments in the aquaculture sector
Subvencije za svetovanje
The GOT introduced a support scheme for businesses which invest funds in certain sectors and certain regions, including the aquaculture sector.
subvencije za ribiška plovila,
The purpose of this scheme is to:
nakup goriva za ribiške čolne (davčna olajšava za gorivo),
increase production and employment,
razrez ribiških plovil,
encourage large investments contributing to international competitiveness,
druge subvencije in drugi subvencijski programi.
stimulate direct foreign investments,
Državna podpora za naložbe v sektorju akvakulture
support investments for environmental protection and R & D activities, in line with the targets outlined in Turkey's various development plans and annual programmes that are specified below.
Turška vlada je uvedla shemo podpore za podjetja, ki vlagajo sredstva v nekaterih sektorjih in regijah, med drugim v sektorju akvakulture.
Legal basis
Namen te sheme je:
The following legal provisions provide for state support to investments in the aquaculture sector:
povečati proizvodnjo in zaposlenost,
Turkish Decree No 2012/3305 published on 19 June 2012 concerning State Support for Investments and Communique No 2012/1 published on 20 June 2012 on the Implementation of the Decree concerning State support for Investments in the Official Gazettes No 28328 and 28329 respectively.
spodbujati velike naložbe, ki prispevajo k mednarodni konkurenčnosti,
Findings of the investigation
spodbujati neposredne tuje naložbe,