natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Without prejudice to the LIFE Regulation and the indicative national allocations and to pursue simplification of administrative procedures, the technical methodology for the project selection may be subject to adaptation and to streamlining in each yearly call for proposals.
Ne glede na uredbo LIFE in okvirne nacionalne dodelitve se lahko zaradi poenostavitve upravnih postopkov tehnična metodologija za izbor projektov v vsakem letnem razpisu prilagodi in racionalizira.
For projects under the sub-programme for Environment other than integrated projects, indicative national allocations have been established on the basis of Annex I to the LIFE Regulation and of the data available in December 2013 for the period covered by the present MAWP.
Za projekte iz podprograma za okolje, z izjemo integriranih projektov, so bile okvirne nacionalne dodelitve določene na podlagi Priloge I k uredbi LIFE in podatkov za obdobje tekočega večletnega delovnega programa, ki so bili na voljo decembra 2013.
They will be used in ranking these projects.
Uporabljene bodo pri prednostni razvrstitvi teh projektov.
In case of an increase or decrease of 10 % or more of one of the criteria listed in Annex I for one of the Member States or if a new Member State joins the European Union this will be considered a significant change of the basis for calculation.
Če se katero od meril iz Priloge I za eno državo članico spremeni za 10 % ali več ali pa se Uniji pridruži nova država članica, se to šteje za bistveno spremembo osnove za izračun.
In case of a significant change the indicative national allocations will be recalculated for all Member States for the remaining period.
V primeru bistvene spremembe bodo okvirne nacionalne dodelitve ponovno izračunane za vse države članice za preostalo obdobje.
Before each call, the Commission will verify, whether a significant change has taken place.
Pred vsakim javnim razpisom bo Komisija preverila, ali je prišlo do bistvene spremembe.
Indicative national allocations for 2014-2017 for projects other than integrated projects under the sub-programme environment
Okvirne nacionalne dodelitve za obdobje 2014–2017 za projekte iz podprograma okolje, z izjemo integriranih projektov
It will be ensured proposals of applicants who are to be excluded or do not fulfil the general eligibility criteria pursuant to Article 131 of the Financial Regulation will not be retained.
Predlogi prosilcev, ki bodo izključeni ali ne izpolnjujejo splošnih meril za upravičenost v skladu s členom 131 finančne uredbe, ne bodo upoštevani.
Furthermore, proposals have to fulfil the admissibility requirements (e.g. for some projects submission of the application only digitally) and eligibility criteria (e.g. conformity with Guidelines on the eligibility of Israeli entities and their activities in the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967 for grants, prizes and financial instruments funded by the EU from 2014 onwards [39]) applicable to all LIFE action grants, which will also be explicitly stated in the respective application guidelines.
Poleg tega morajo predlogi izpolnjevati zahteve glede dopustnosti (npr. pri nekaterih predlogih je oddaja vloge samo digitalna) in merila za upravičenost (npr. skladnost s smernicami o upravičenosti izraelskih subjektov in njihovih dejavnosti na ozemljih, ki jih Izrael okupira od junija 1967, do nepovratnih sredstev, nagrad in finančnih instrumentov iz sredstev EU od leta 2014 [39]), ki veljajo za vsa nepovratna sredstva za dejavnosti iz programa LIFE, kar bo poudarjeno tudi v zadevnih navodilih za prijavo.
The eligibility criteria applicable to the different project types are referred to under the relevant heading.
Merila za upravičenost za različne vrste projektov so navedena pod ustrezno postavko.
Criteria that apply in the same way to different project types will only be mentioned under Section 5.1.1 (projects pursuant to Article 18(a), (b), (c) and (h) of the LIFE Regulation).Pursuant to Article 6(2) of the LIFE Regulation, legal persons established outside the Union may participate in projects referred to in Article 18 of the LIFE Regulation, provided the beneficiary coordinating the project is based in the Union and any activity to be carried out outside the Union meets the requirements set out in Article 6(1) of the LIFE Regulation.
Merila, ki enako veljajo za različne vrste projektov, bodo navedena samo v oddelku 5.1.1 (Projekti v skladu s členom 18(a), (b), (c) in (h) uredbe LIFE).V skladu s členom 6(2) uredbe LIFE so pravne osebe s sedežem zunaj Unije lahko upravičene do sodelovanja v projektih, navedenih v členu 18 uredbe LIFE, če ima upravičenec, ki usklajuje projekt, sedež v Uniji in če dejavnost, ki bo izvedena zunaj Unije, izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 6(1) uredbe LIFE.
Pursuant to Article 7 of the LIFE Regulation cooperation with the relevant international organisations, their institutions and bodies shall be possible in the course of implementing the LIFE Programme where needed for the purpose of achieving the general objectives set out in Article 3 of the LIFE Regulation.
V skladu s členom 7 uredbe LIFE je sodelovanje z ustreznimi mednarodnimi organizacijami, njihovimi institucijami in organi med izvajanjem programa LIFE mogoče, če je to potrebno za uresničevanje splošnih ciljev iz člena 3 uredbe LIFE.
Moreover, proposals will only be selected if, based on specific supporting documents related to their applicant’s performance during previous years, they can demonstrate
Poleg tega bodo predlogi izbrani le, če lahko na podlagi posebnih podpornih dokumentov, povezanih z uspešnostjo prosilca v preteklih letih, dokažejo:
operational capacity — the applicant must have the professional competencies and qualifications required to complete the project and
operativno zmogljivost; prosilec mora biti ustrezno usposobljen in kvalificiran za dokončanje projekta, in
financial capacity — the applicant must have stable and sufficient sources of funding to maintain his activity throughout the duration of the project and to participate in its funding.
finančno zmogljivost; prosilec mora imeti stalna in zadostna finančna sredstva za izvajanje svoje dejavnosti v celotnem obdobju izvajanja projekta ter prispevati k njenemu financiranju.
Article 131 of the Financial Regulation will apply to the selection of public bodies and international organisations with respect to their financial capacity.
Izbor javnih organov in mednarodnih organizacij glede na njihovo finančno zmogljivost bo potekal v skladu s členom 131 finančne uredbe.
Projects pursuant to Article 18(a), (b), (c) and (h) of the LIFE Regulation
Projekti v skladu s členom 18(a), (b), (c) in (h) uredbe LIFE
The selection of pilot, demonstration, best practice, and information, awareness, and dissemination projects within the meaning of Article 18(a), (b), (c) and (h) of the LIFE Regulation follow the same technical methodology for project selection and are subject to similar eligibility and award criteria, as outlined in the following.
Za izbor pilotnih in predstavitvenih projektov, projektov dobre prakse ter projektov za informiranje, ozaveščenost in razširjanje v smislu člena 18(a), (b), (c) in (h) uredbe LIFE se uporabljajo ista tehnična metodologija za izbor projektov ter podobna merila za upravičenost in dodelitev sredstev, kot je navedeno v nadaljevanju.
Technical methodology for the project selection procedure
Tehnična metodologija za postopek izbora projektov
The project selection procedure will be organised as follows:
Postopek izbora projektov bo potekal na naslednji način:
The Commission and/or EA will verify the compliance of each proposal with the eligibility and selection criteria and will evaluate them against the award criteria.
Komisija in/ali izvajalska agencija bo preverila skladnost vsakega predloga z merili za upravičenost in izbor ter jih ocenila glede na merila za dodelitev.
Preparation of a ‘preliminary long list’ of proposals
Priprava „predhodnega dolgega seznama“ predlogov
The Commission and/or EA will rank the eligible proposals based on merit and in compliance with the rule that at least 55 % of the budgetary resources allocated to projects supported by way of action grants under the sub-programme for Environment shall be allocated to nature conservation and biodiversity (Article 9(3) of the LIFE Regulation).
Komisija in/ali izvajalska agencija bo upravičene predloge razvrstila glede na kakovost in v skladu s pravilom, da je vsaj 55 % proračunskih sredstev, dodeljenih projektom, ki so podprti z nepovratnimi sredstvi za dejavnosti iz podprograma za okolje, namenjenih projektom za ohranjanje narave in biotske raznovrstnosti (člen 9(3) uredbe LIFE).
The Commission and/or EA will also endeavour to ensure that at least 15 % of the budgetary resources dedicated to the projects are allocated to transnational projects (Article 19(7) of the LIFE Regulation).
Komisija in/ali izvajalska agencija si bo tudi prizadevala zagotoviti, da je vsaj 15 % proračunskih sredstev namenjenih projektom, ki so del nadnacionalnih projektov (člen 19(7) uredbe LIFE).
In addition, regarding projects under the sub-programme for Environment, the Commission and/or EA will ensure geographical balance (Article 19(5) of the LIFE Regulation).
Poleg tega bo Komisija in/ali izvajalska agencija za projekte v okviru podprograma za okolje zagotovila geografsko ravnotežje (člen 19(5) uredbe LIFE).
The preliminary long list will include all proposals in order of decreasing ranking so that the total of the proposed project budgets equal approximately 130 % of the available budget.
Na predhodnem dolgem seznamu bodo vsi predlogi razvrščeni v padajočem vrstnem redu, tako da bo skupni proračun predlaganih proračunov za projekte enak približno 130 % razpoložljivega proračuna.
Preparation of the final list of projects to be funded and of the reserve list
Priprava končnega seznama projektov, ki bodo financirani, in rezervnega seznama
After a review phase successful projects will be proposed for funding, within the available budget.
Po fazi pregleda bodo uspešni projekti predloženi za financiranje v okviru razpoložljivega proračuna.
A reserve list will be constituted with the best-ranked projects that cannot be funded in view of the available budget.
Pripravljen bo rezervni seznam z najbolje uvrščenimi projekti, ki jih ni mogoče financirati v okviru razpoložljivega proračuna.
The reserve list will encompass an additional 20 % of the available LIFE budget.
Rezervni seznam bo obsegal dodatnih 20 % proračuna, ki je na voljo za program LIFE.
Signature of the grant agreement
Podpis sporazuma o nepovratnih sredstvih
Eligibility and award criteria
Merila za upravičenost in dodelitev sredstev
The following eligibility and award criteria will be applied:
Uporabljena bodo naslednja merila za upravičenost in dodelitev sredstev:
A proposal for a project within the meaning of Article 18(a), (b), (c), or (h) of the LIFE Regulation will not be retained for an evaluation of its merit, if the project proposal does not demonstrate that the project:
Ocena kakovosti predloga projekta v smislu člena 18(a), (b), (c), ali (h) uredbe LIFE ne bo opravljena, če predlog projekta ne dokazuje, da projekt:
contributes to one or several of the general objectives set out in Article 3 of the LIFE Regulation and of the applicable specific objectives in Articles 10, 11, 12 and 14, 15 and 16 of the LIFE Regulation,
prispeva k vsaj enemu od splošnih ciljev iz člena 3 uredbe LIFE in zastavljenih posebnih ciljev iz členov 10, 11, 12, 14, 15 in 16 uredbe LIFE;
falls within the scope of the priority area of the LIFE sub-programme as set out in Articles 9 and 13 of the LIFE Regulation under which the project proposal was submitted, and
sodi v področje uporabe prednostnega področja podprograma programa LIFE iz členov 9 in 13 uredbe LIFE, v okviru katerega je bil predlog projekta predložen, in
corresponds to one of the following project types as defined in Article 2(a), (b), (c) and (h) of the LIFE Regulation:
ustreza enemu od naslednjih vrst projektov, opredeljenih v členu 2(a), (b), (c) in (h) uredbe LIFE:
‘Pilot projects’ are projects that apply a technique or method that has not been applied or tested before, or elsewhere, that offer potential environmental or climate advantages compared to current best practice and that can subsequently be applied on a larger scale to similar situations.
„pilotni projekti“ so projekti, pri katerih se uporablja tehnika ali metoda, ki pred tem še ni bila uporabljena ali preskušena, prinaša morebitne okoljske in podnebne prednosti v primerjavi s trenutno dobro prakso ter jo je pozneje v podobnih razmerah mogoče uporabiti v večjem obsegu;
‘Demonstration projects’ are projects that put into practice, test, evaluate and disseminate actions, methodologies or approaches that are new or unknown in the specific context of the project, such as the geographical, ecological, socioeconomic context, and that could be applied elsewhere in similar circumstances.
„predstavitveni projekti“ so projekti, ki vpeljejo v prakso, preizkusijo, ocenjujejo in razširjajo ukrepe, metodologije ali pristope, ki so novi ali neznani v posebnem sklopu projekta, kot so geografski, ekološki in socialno-ekonomski sklopi, in bi jih bilo mogoče v podobnih okoliščinah uporabiti tudi drugje;
‘Best practice projects’ are projects that apply appropriate, cost-effective and state-of-the-art techniques, methods and approaches taking into account the specific context of the project.
„projekti dobre prakse“ so projekti, pri katerih se uporabljajo ustrezne, stroškovno učinkovite in najsodobnejše tehnike, metode in pristopi, hkrati pa se upošteva poseben sklop projekta.
For Pilot, demonstration and best practice projects in the area of nature conservation and biodiversity, at least 25 % of the budget must be dedicated to concrete conservation action (limited exceptions will be possible in view of the specific policy needs and will be explicitly identified in the application guide).
pri pilotnih in predstavitvenih projektih ter projektih dobre prakse na področju ohranjanja narave in biotske raznovrstnosti mora biti vsaj 25 % proračuna namenjenega konkretnemu ukrepu ohranjanja narave (ob upoštevanju posebnih potreb politike bodo mogoče redke izjeme, ki bodo izrecno opredeljene v navodilih za prijavo);
‘Information, awareness and dissemination projects’ are projects aimed at supporting communication, dissemination of information and awareness raising in the fields of the sub-programme for Environment.
„projekti za informiranje, ozaveščenost in razširjanje“ so projekti, namenjeni podpori za komuniciranje, razširjanje informacij in ozaveščanje na področjih podprograma za okolje.
Projects focused on research [40] or dedicated to the construction of large infrastructure do not fall within the scope of the LIFE programme and are therefore not eligible.
projekti, osredotočeni na raziskave [40] ali namenjeni gradnji velike infrastrukture, ne sodijo na področje uporabe programa LIFE in zato niso upravičeni do financiranja.
The merit of all eligible proposals that fulfil the eligibility criteria, will be evaluated and scored according to the following award criteria and scoring system:
Kakovost vseh predlogov, upravičenih do financiranja, ki izpolnjujejo merila za upravičenost, bo ocenjena in točkovana v skladu z naslednjim sistemom za dodelitev sredstev in točkovanje:
Technical coherence and quality
Tehnična skladnost in kakovost
This criterion will focus on the clarity, feasibility and sustainability of the actions proposed in the proposal.
To merilo bo osredotočeno na jasnost, izvedljivost in trajnost ukrepov, predlaganih v predlogu.
The sustainability of the project results in the medium and long term is the capacity to maintain them after project implementation.
Pogoj za ohranjanje rezultatov projekta po njegovi izvedbi je njihova srednjeročna in dolgoročna trajnost.
Successful sustainability presupposes a strategy including tasks to ensure the continuation of necessary project actions and the related funding after the end of the project.
Za uspešno trajnost je potrebna strategija, ki obsega naloge za zagotavljanje nadaljnjega izvajanja potrebnih ukrepov projekta in povezanega financiranja po koncu projekta.
Financial coherence and quality
Finančna skladnost in kakovost
The proposed budget and its consistency with the actions proposed and with the applicable rules as well as the cost-effectiveness of the proposed approach will be evaluated.
Ocenjena bosta predlagani proračun ter njegova skladnost s predlaganimi ukrepi in veljavnimi predpisi ter stroškovna učinkovitost predlaganega pristopa.
EU added value: extent and quality of the contribution to the specific objectives of the priority areas of the two LIFE sub-programmes
Dodana vrednost EU: obseg in kakovost prispevka k posebnim ciljem prednostnih področij obeh podprogramov programa LIFE
The extent to which each proposal contributes to one or several of the specific objectives of the priority areas of the two LIFE sub-programmes as set out in Articles 10, 11 and 12 of the LIFE Regulation (for the LIFE Environment sub-programme) and Articles 14, 15 and 16 (for the LIFE Climate Action sub-programme) and the quality of this contribution will be evaluated.
Ocenjena bosta obseg, v katerem vsak predlog prispeva k vsaj enemu posebnemu cilju prednostnih področij obeh podprogramov programa LIFE iz členov 10, 11 in 12 uredbe LIFE (za podprogram programa LIFE za okolje) in členov 14, 15 in 16 (za podprogram programa LIFE za podnebne ukrepe) ter kakovost tega prispevka.
EU added value: replicability and transferability: Replicability and transferability is the potential of the project to be replicated and transferred during and after its implementation.
Dodana vrednost EU: ponovljivost in prenosljivost: Ponovljivost in prenosljivost sta potencial projekta za njegovo ponovitev ter prenos med njegovim izvajanjem in po njem.
Successful replication and transferability require a strategy including tasks to multiply the impacts of the projects’ solutions and mobilise a wider uptake, reaching a critical mass during the project and/or in a short and medium term perspective after the end of the LIFE project.
Za uspešno ponovljivost in prenosljivost je potrebna strategija z nalogami, ki pomnožijo učinke rešitev projekta in zagotovijo širšo uporabo, pri čemer med izvajanjem projekta ter/ali s kratkoročnega in srednjeročnega vidika po koncu projekta LIFE dosežejo kritično maso.
This goes beyond transfer of knowledge and networking, and involves putting the techniques, methods or strategies developed or applied in the project into practice elsewhere.
To presega prenos znanja in mreženje ter vključuje uporabo tehnik, metod in strategij, ki so bile v projektu razvite ali uporabljene, drugje v praksi.
EU added value: other aspects
Dodana vrednost EU: drugi vidiki
Transnational: Transnational proposals shall be favoured, if transnational cooperation is essential to guarantee the achievement of the project’s objectives.
Nadnacionalni: če je nadnacionalno sodelovanje ključno za zagotavljanje doseganja ciljev projekta, imajo prednost nadnacionalni predlogi.
On the basis of this criterion, additional points may only be given to a proposal if there is sufficient evidence for an added value of the transnational approach.
Na podlagi tega merila so lahko dodatne točke dodeljene le, če obstajajo zadostni dokazi o dodani vrednosti nadnacionalnega pristopa.
Green procurement: Proposals that foresee a clear delivery mechanism to ensure an extensive application of green procurement concepts will receive a higher scoring.
Zelena javna naročila: predlogi, v katerih je predviden jasen mehanizem za izvajanje, ki bo zagotovil obsežno uporabo konceptov zelenih javnih naročil, bodo prejeli več točk.
Uptake of the results of EU Research and Innovation Programmes: Proposals that foresee to take up the results of environmental and climate-related research and innovation projects financed by Horizon 2020 or by preceding Framework Programmes will receive a higher scoring, if there is sufficient evidence for the added value of this uptake for the project.
Uporaba rezultatov programov EU za raziskave in inovacije: predlogi, v katerih je predvidena uporaba rezultatov okoljskih in podnebnih raziskav ter inovacij, financiranih v okviru pobude Obzorje 2020 ali predhodnih okvirnih programov, bodo prejeli več točk, če obstajajo zadostni dokazi, da ima projekt zaradi te uporabe dodano vrednost.
Specific criteria and scoring system for Environment projects
Posebna merila in sistem točkovanja za projekte na področju okolja
The specific criteria and scoring system under the sub-programme Environment reflect the fact that only under the sub-programme Environment thematic priorities (Annex III to the LIFE Regulation) and the related project topics (Heading 2 above) were defined.
Podprogram za okolje obsega posebna merila in sistem točkovanja, ker so bile tematske prednostne naloge (Priloga III k uredbi LIFE) in povezane projektne teme (naslov 2) opredeljene le v okviru podprograma za okolje.
EU added value: contribution to the project topics
Dodana vrednost EU: prispevanje k projektnim temam
LIFE proposals clearly falling under the project topics implementing the thematic priorities set out in Annex III for the sub-programme Environment as defined in the multiannual work programme will receive additional points under this criterion.
Predlogi v okviru programa LIFE, ki očitno sodijo med projektne teme za izvajanje tematskih prednostnih nalog iz Priloge III za podprogram za okolje, kot so opredeljene v večletnem delovnem programu, bodo na podlagi tega merila prejeli dodatne točke.
Minimum pass score [41]
Najnižje število zahtevanih točk [41]
Maximum score
Najvišje število točk
EU added value: extent and quality of the contribution to the specific objectives of the priority areas of the LIFE sub-programme for Environment
Dodana vrednost EU: obseg in kakovost prispevka k posebnim ciljem prednostnih področij podprograma za okolje programa LIFE
Contribution to the project topics
Prispevanje k projektnim temam
EU added value: multipurpose, synergies, and integration
Dodana vrednost EU: večnamenskost, sinergije in vključevanje
EU added value: replicability and transferability
Dodana vrednost EU: ponovljivost in prenosljivost
EU added value: transnational, green procurement, uptake
Dodana vrednost EU: nadnacionalnost, zelena javna naročila, uporaba rezultatov
Overall (pass) scores
Skupno število (zahtevanih) točk
Specific criteria and scoring system for Climate Action projects
Posebna merila in sistem točkovanja za projekte na področju podnebnih ukrepov
EU added value: Contribution to an increased climate resilience and/or to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions
Dodana vrednost EU: prispevek k večji odpornosti proti podnebnim spremembam in/ali zmanjšanju emisij toplogrednih plinov
Projects under the sub-programme for Climate Action need to demonstrate a transformative impact on increased climate resilience and/or on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
Projekti iz podprograma za podnebne ukrepe morajo dokazati, da imajo transformativen učinek na večjo odpornost proti podnebnim spremembam in/ali zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov.
This should contribute to the shift towards a resource-efficient, low-carbon and climate-resilient economy.
To mora prispevati k prehodu na nizkoogljično gospodarstvo, odporno na podnebne spremembe, ki učinkovito izrablja vire.
It will be assessed at the level of the project itself and at the level of the potential of wider replication/transferability of the project’s results achieved during the project or in a post-project stage.
Ocenjeno bo na ravni projekta in na ravni potenciala za širšo ponovljivost in prenosljivost rezultatov projekta, doseženih med izvajanjem projekta ali po njem.
Minimum pass score [42]
Najnižje število zahtevanih točk [42]
EU added value: Extent and quality of the contribution to an increased climate resilience and/or to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions
Dodana vrednost EU: obseg in kakovost prispevka k večji odpornosti proti podnebnim spremembam in/ali zmanjšanju emisij toplogrednih plinov