natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Belorusija
Bahrain
Čile
Bermuda
Fidži
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba (the BES Islands)
Falklandski otoki
Canada
Jamajka
Chile
Japonska
Fiji
Kajmanski otoki
Falkland Islands
Sveta Lucija
Hong Kong
Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija
Jamaica
Mehika
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Nova Kaledonija
Cayman Islands
Nova Zelandija
Saint Lucia
Francoska Polinezija
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Rusija
Mexico
Sveta Helena
Malaysia
Trinidad in Tobago
French Polynesia
AS – Ameriška Samoa
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
GU – Guam
Russia
MP – Severni Marianski otoki
Singapore
PR – Portoriko
Saint Helena
VI – Deviški otoki Združenih držav Amerike“
Trinidad and Tobago
Britanski Deviški otoki
Taiwan
Wallis in Futuna
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1220/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1220/2014
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1222/2014
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1222/2014
supplementing Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the specification of the methodology for the identification of global systemically important institutions and for the definition of subcategories of global systemically important institutions
o dopolnitvi Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z regulativnimi tehničnimi standardi za specifikacijo metodologije za določitev globalnih sistemsko pomembnih institucij in za opredelitev podkategorij globalnih sistemsko pomembnih institucij
Having regard to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC [1], and in particular Article 131(18) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o dostopu do dejavnosti kreditnih institucij in bonitetnem nadzoru kreditnih institucij in investicijskih podjetij, spremembi Direktive 2002/87/ES in razveljavitvi direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES [1] ter zlasti člena 131(18) Direktive,
Directive 2013/36/EU empowers competent or designated authorities of the Member States to impose higher own funds requirements on global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs) in order to compensate for the higher risk that G-SIIs represent for the financial system and the potential impact of their failure on taxpayers.
Direktiva 2013/36/EU pooblašča pristojne ali imenovane organe držav članic, da naložijo strožje kapitalske zahteve globalnim sistemsko pomembnim institucijam (GSPI), da bi tako uravnotežili večje tveganje, ki ga GSPI predstavljajo za finančni sistem, in potencialni učinek njihovega propada na davkoplačevalce.
That Directive outlines certain basic principles of a methodology for the identification of G-SIIs and for the allocation of G-SIIs to subcategories in accordance with their systemic relevance.
Navedena direktiva navaja nekatera osnovna načela metodologije za določitev GSPI in razvrstitev GSPI v podkategorije v skladu z njihovim sistemskim pomenom.
In accordance with that allocation they will be assigned an additional Common Equity Tier 1 capital requirement, the G-SII buffer.
V skladu z navedeno razvrstitvijo se jim bo dodelila zahteva po dodatnem navadnem lastniškem temeljnem kapitalu, blažilniku za GSPI.
That methodology of identification and allocation of G-SIIs is based on five categories measuring the systemic significance of a bank for the global financial market, and is further specified in this Regulation.
Navedena metodologija za določitev in razvrstitev GSPI temelji na petih kategorijah, ki merijo sistemski pomen banke za svetovni finančni trg, in je nadalje opredeljena v tej uredbi.
In order to follow the approach of Directive 2013/36/EU, this Regulation should take into account standards for the methodology of assessing global systemically important banks and for the higher loss absorbency requirement by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, that are based on the framework for global systemically important financial institutions established by the Financial Stability Board following the report ‘Reducing the moral hazard posed by systemically important financial institutions — FSB Recommendations and Time Lines’.
Da bi ta uredba upoštevala pristop Direktive 2013/36/EU, bi morala upoštevati standarde za metodologijo ocenjevanja globalnih sistemsko pomembnih bank in za strožjo zahtevo Baselskega odbora za bančni nadzor glede pokrivanja izgub, ki temeljijo na okviru za globalne sistemsko pomembne institucije, vzpostavljenem s strani Odbora za finančno stabilnost po poročilu z naslovom „Reducing the moral hazard posed by systemically important financial institutions – FSB Recommendations and Time Lines“ (Zmanjšanje moralnega tveganja, ki ga predstavljajo sistemsko pomembne finančne institucije – priporočila in roki FSB).
Directive 2013/36/EU makes clear that the identification and allocation methodology is harmonised in all Member States by the use of uniform and transparent parameters for determining an overall score of an entity to measure its systemic importance.
Direktiva 2013/36/EU zagotavlja, da je metodologija za določitev in razvrstitev usklajena v vseh državah članicah z uporabo enotnih in preglednih parametrov za določanje skupnega rezultata za subjekt pri merjenju njegovega sistemskega pomena.
In order to ensure that the sample of banks and banking groups both of the Union and authorised in third countries serving as a reference to reflect the global financial system are uniform across the Union, the European Banking Authority (EBA) should determine that sample.
Za zagotovitev, da je vzorec bank in bančnih skupin Unije ter tistih z dovoljenjem za opravljanje dejavnosti v tretjih državah, ki predstavljajo referenčni okvir za prikaz svetovnega finančnega sistema, enoten za vso Unijo, bi moral navedeni vzorec določiti Evropski bančni organ (EBA).
Exclusions and additions to that sample based on supervisory judgment should be chosen strictly to ensure its function as a term of reference and should not be based on other grounds.
Izvzetja iz navedenega vzorca in dodatke k temu vzorcu na podlagi nadzorniške presoje bi bilo treba izbrati strogo zaradi zagotavljanja njegove funkcije kot referenčnega okvira in ne na podlagi drugih razlogov.
The G-SII identification process should be based on comparable data and should take into account that institutions need clarity as to whether and in which amount a buffer requirement will apply to them, therefore, timelines and procedures for that process should be included in the methodology.
Postopek določitve GSPI bi moral temeljiti na primerljivih podatkih in upoštevati, da morajo biti institucije seznanjene s tem, ali in v kolikšni meri bo zanje veljala zahteva po blažilniku, zato bi bilo treba v metodologijo vključiti roke in procese za navedeni postopek.
However, since the identification of G-SIIs should be based on up-to-date data relating to the sample of large global banking groups some of which are authorised in third countries, the data needed will not be available earlier than the second half of each year.
Ker pa bi določitev GSPI morala temeljiti na posodobljenih podatkih v zvezi z vzorcem velikih svetovnih bančnih skupin, od katerih so nekatere pridobile dovoljenje za opravljanje dejavnosti v tretjih državah, zahtevani podatki ne bodo na voljo pred drugo polovico vsakega leta.
In order to enable institutions to comply with the requirements resulting from their status as a G-SII, the buffer requirement should take effect as of approximately one year following their identification as a G-SII.
Da bodo lahko institucije izpolnjevale zahteve na podlagi statusa kot GSPI, bi morala zahteva po blažilniku začeti veljati približno eno leto po njihovi določitvi za GSPI.
Directive 2013/36/EU sets out five categories measuring systemic significance, which consist of quantifiable indicators.
Direktiva 2013/36/EU določa pet kategorij, ki merijo sistemski pomen in vključujejo merljive kazalnike.
In order to minimise the administrative burden for institutions and authorities, those categories are identical to those applied by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
Da bi se čim bolj zmanjšalo upravno breme za institucije in organe, so navedene kategorije enake tistim, ki jih uporablja Baselski odbor za bančni nadzor.
In further defining the quantifiable indicators, this Regulation should follow the same approach.
Ta uredba bi morala pri nadaljnji opredelitvi merljivih kazalnikov uporabiti enak pristop.
The indicators should be chosen to reflect the different aspects of potential negative externalities of an entity's failure and its critical functions for the stability of the financial system.
Kazalnike bi bilo treba izbrati tako, da bi izražali različne vidike potencialnih negativnih zunanjih učinkov propada subjekta in njegove funkcije, ki so pomembne za stabilnost finančnega sistema.
The reference system for assessing systemic significance should be the global financial markets and the global economy.
Referenčni sistem za ocenjevanje sistemskega pomena bi morali biti svetovni finančni trgi in svetovno gospodarstvo.
In order to set out a precise methodology for identifying and classifying G-SIIs in accordance with the basic rules set out in Directive 2013/36/EU, it is important to clearly circumscribe the notions of ‘relevant entity’, ‘indicator value’, ‘denominator’ and ‘cut-off score’ by defining them for the purposes of this Regulation.
Za določitev natančne metodologije za določitev in razvrstitev GSPI v skladu z osnovnimi pravili iz Direktive 2013/36/EU je treba jasno omejiti pojme „zadevni subjekt“, „vrednost kazalnika“, „imenovalec“ in „presečna vrednost rezultata“ z njihovo opredelitvijo za namene te uredbe.
The systemic significance of each banking group measured by the indicators on a consolidated basis should be expressed as an individual overall score for a certain year measuring its position relative to other entities in the sample.
Sistemski pomen posamezne bančne skupine, merjen s kazalniki na konsolidirani podlagi, bi bilo treba izraziti kot posamezni skupni rezultat za določeno leto, ki meri njen položaj glede na druge subjekte v vzorcu.
Banks should be identified as G-SIIs and allocated to the sub-categories to which different capital buffer requirements will apply, based on that overall score.
Banke bi morale biti na podlagi navedenega skupnega rezultata določene za GSPI in razvrščene v podkategorije, za katere se bodo uporabljale različne zahteve za kapitalski blažilnik.
When calculating the score as the average of the category scores, each of the five categories should receive a weighting of 20 %.
Pri izračunu rezultata kot povprečja rezultatov posameznih kategorij bi morala vsaka izmed petih kategorij prejeti utež 20 %.
A cap should be applied to the substitutability category for the purpose of calculating the overall score given that, on the basis of an analysis of data until and including the year 2013, that category proved to have a disproportionately high impact on the score for banks that are dominant in the provision of payment, underwriting and asset custody services.
Za kategorijo nadomestljivosti se je na podlagi analize podatkov do vključno leta 2013 izkazalo, da ima nesorazmerno velik učinek na rezultate za banke, ki so vodilne pri izvajanju plačilnih storitev, storitev odkupa izdaje vrednostnih papirjev in skrbništva sredstev, zato bi bilo treba za navedeno kategorijo pri izračunu skupnega rezultata uporabiti omejitev.
Relevant authorities should have the option to use sound supervisory judgment to re-allocate a G-SII from a lower subcategory to a higher subcategory or to designate an entity as a G-SII that has an overall score that is lower than the cut-off score of the lowest subcategory.
Zadevni organi bi morali imeti možnost, da uporabijo premišljeno nadzorniško presojo za prerazvrstitev GSPI iz nižje podkategorije v višjo podkategorijo ali za opredelitev subjekta kot GSPI, ki ima skupni rezultat nižji od presečnih vrednosti rezultata najnižje podkategorije.
As that identification by supervisory judgment shares the same objective as the regular scoring process, the criterion upon which this judgment is to be based should also be the bank's systemic significance for the global financial market and the global economy, consistent with the methodology used by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
Cilj te določitve z nadzorniško presojo je enak kot pri rednem postopku ocenjevanja, zato bi moralo biti merilo, na katerem bo temeljila ta presoja, tudi sistemski pomen banke za svetovni finančni trg in svetovno gospodarstvo, v skladu z metodologijo, ki jo uporablja Baselski odbor za bančni nadzor.
The failure risk of the bank should not be a criterion, as it is already accounted for in other prudential requirements, inter alia, in the total risk exposure amount and, where applicable, in further own fund requirements such as the systemic risk buffer.
Tveganje propada banke ne bi smelo biti merilo, saj je že upoštevano v drugih bonitetnih zahtevah, med drugim v znesku skupne izpostavljenosti tveganju in po potrebi v nadaljnjih kapitalskih zahtevah, kot je blažilnik sistemskih tveganj.
This Regulation is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by the EBA to the Commission.
Ta uredba temelji na osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, ki jih je EBA predložila Komisiji.
The EBA has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the opinion of the Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
EBA je opravila odprta javna posvetovanja o osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, na katerih temelji ta uredba, analizirala potencialne povezane stroške in koristi ter prosila za mnenje interesno skupino, ustanovljeno v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2].
Therefore and to inform institutions in a timely manner of the G-SII buffer applicable to them and to give them sufficient time to raise the required capital, G-SIIs should be identified in early 2015 at the latest.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
the first step of the requirement referred to in Article 162(5)(a) of Directive 2013/36/EU should apply from 1 January 2016 for those G-SIIs which have been identified by relevant authorities in early 2015, on the basis of data of financial year-ends prior to July 2014.
Vsebina in področje uporabe
The second step referred to in Article 162(5)(b) of Directive 2013/36/EU of the G-SII buffer requirement should apply from 1 January 2017 for those G-SIIs which have been identified by relevant authorities by the end of 2015 or, at the latest, the beginning of 2016, on the basis of data of financial year-ends prior to July 2015,
Ta uredba določa metodologijo, v skladu s katero organ iz člena 131(1) Direktive 2013/36/EU (v nadaljnjem besedilu: zadevni organ) države članice na konsolidirani podlagi zadevni subjekt določi za globalno sistemsko pomembno institucijo (GSPI), metodologijo za opredelitev podkategorij GSPI in razvrstitev GSPI v navedene podkategorije na podlagi njihovega sistemskega pomena ter, v okviru zadevne metodologije, roke in podatke, ki se uporabijo za določitev.
Article 1
Opredelitve pojmov
Subject matter and scope
Za namene te uredbe se uporabljajo naslednje opredelitve pojmov:
This Regulation specifies the methodology in accordance with which the authority referred to in Article 131(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU (hereinafter referred to as ‘relevant authority’) of a Member State shall identify, on a consolidated basis, a relevant entity as a global systemically important institution (G-SII), and the methodology for the definition of subcategories of G-SIIs and the allocation of G-SIIs to those subcategories based on their systemic significance and, as part of the methodology, timelines and data to be used for the identification.
„zadevni subjekt“ pomeni EU nadrejeno institucijo ali EU nadrejeni finančni holding ali EU nadrejeni mešani finančni holding ali institucijo, ki ni podrejena družba EU nadrejene institucije ali EU nadrejenega finančnega holdinga ali EU nadrejenega mešanega finančnega holdinga;
Article 2
„vrednost kazalnika“ pomeni posamezno vrednost kazalnika za vsak kazalnik iz člena 6 in vsak zadevni subjekt iz vzorca ter primerljivo posamezno vrednost za vsako banko z dovoljenjem za opravljanje dejavnosti v tretji državi, ki je bila javno razkrita v skladu z mednarodno dogovorjenimi standardi;
Definitions
„imenovalec“ pomeni za vsak kazalnik skupno vrednost vrednosti kazalnika zadevnih subjektov in bank v vzorcu, ki imajo dovoljenje za opravljanje dejavnosti v tretjih državah;
For the purpose of this Regulation, the following definitions apply:
„presečna vrednost rezultata“ pomeni vrednost rezultata, ki določa najnižjo mejo in meje med petimi podkategorijami, kot je opredeljeno v členu 131(9) Direktive 2013/36/EU.
‘Relevant entity’ means an EU parent institution or EU parent financial holding company or EU parent mixed financial holding company or an institution that is not a subsidiary of an EU parent institution or EU parent financial holding company or EU parent mixed financial holding company;
Člen 3
‘Indicator value’ means for each indicator set out in Article 6 and for each relevant entity of the sample the individual value of the indicator and for each bank authorised in a third country a comparable individual value publicly disclosed in accordance with internationally agreed standards;
Skupni parametri za metodologijo
‘Denominator’ means for each indicator the total aggregate value of the indicator values of the relevant entities and banks authorised in third countries of the sample;
EBA določi vzorec institucij ali skupin, katerih vrednosti kazalnika se bodo kot referenčne vrednosti, ki predstavljajo svetovni bančni sektor, ob upoštevanju mednarodno dogovorjenih standardov uporabile za izračun rezultatov, zlasti vzorec, ki ga Baselski odbor za bančni nadzor uporablja za določitev globalnih sistemsko pomembnih bank, in zadevne organe do 31. julija vsako leto obvesti o zadevnih subjektih, vključenih v vzorec.
‘Cut-off score’ means a score value determining the lowest boundary and the boundaries between the five subcategories as defined in Article 131(9) of Directive 2013/36/EU.
Vzorec sestavljajo zadevni organi in banke z dovoljenjem za opravljanje dejavnosti v tretjih državah, in sicer 75 največjih med njimi na podlagi skupne izpostavljenosti, kot je določeno v členu 6(1), zadevni subjekti, ki so bili določeni za GSPI, in banke v tretjih državah, ki so bile za globalne sistemsko pomembne določene v preteklem letu.
Article 3
EBA po potrebi izključi ali doda zadevne subjekte ali banke z dovoljenjem za opravljanje dejavnosti v tretjih državah v obsegu, potrebnem za zagotavljanje ustreznega referenčnega sistema za ocenjevanje sistemskega pomena, ki odraža svetovne finančne trge in svetovno gospodarstvo, pri čemer upošteva mednarodno dogovorjene standarde, vključno z vzorcem, ki ga uporablja Baselski odbor za bančni nadzor.
Common parameters for the methodology
Zadevni organ najpozneje 31. julija vsako leto EBA sporoči vrednosti kazalnika posameznega zadevnega subjekta z mero izpostavljenosti nad 200 milijard EUR, ki je subjekt z dovoljenjem v njegovi jurisdikciji.
The EBA shall identify a sample of institutions or groups whose indicator values are to be used as reference values representing the global banking sector for the purpose of calculating the scores, taking into account internationally agreed standards, in particular the sample used by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision for the identification of global systemically important banks and shall notify relevant authorities of the relevant entities included in the sample by 31 July of each year.
Zadevni organ zagotovi, da so vrednosti kazalnika enake vrednostim, ki so bile sporočene Baselskemu odboru za bančni nadzor, in vrednostim, ki jih je navedeni zadevni organ razkril v skladu z Izvedbeno uredbo Komisije (EU) št. 1030/2014 [3].
The sample shall consist of relevant entities and banks authorised in third countries and comprise the 75 largest of them, based on the total exposure as defined in Article 6(1), as well as relevant entities that were designated as G-SIIs and banks in third countries that were designated as global systemically important in the previous year.
Zadevni organ uporabi obrazce iz navedene izvedbene uredbe.
The EBA shall exclude or add relevant entities or banks authorised in third countries, if and to the extent necessary to ensure an adequate reference system for assessing systemic significance reflecting the global financial markets and the global economy, taking into account internationally agreed standards including the sample used by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
EBA izračuna imenovalce na podlagi vrednosti kazalnika, ki ga sporoči zadevni organ v skladu z odstavkom 2, ob upoštevanju mednarodno dogovorjenih standardov, zlasti imenovalce, ki jih Baselski odbor za bančni nadzor objavi za zadevno leto, in jih sporoči zadevnim organom.
The relevant authority shall report the indicator values of each relevant entity with an exposure measure above EUR 200 billion which is authorised within its jurisdiction to the EBA not later than 31 July each year.
Imenovalec kazalnika je skupni znesek vrednosti kazalnika za vse zadevne subjekte in banke z dovoljenjem za opravljanje dejavnosti v tretjih državah v vzorcu, kot je bil sporočen za zadevne organe v skladu z odstavkom 2 ter kot so ga banke z dovoljenjem za opravljanje dejavnosti v tretjih državah razkrile 31. julija zadevnega leta.
The relevant authority shall ensure that the indicator values are identical to the ones submitted to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and to those disclosed by that relevant entity in accordance with Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1030/2014 [3].
Člen 4
The relevant authority shall use the templates set out therein.
Postopek opredelitve
The EBA shall compute the denominators, based on the indicator values reported by the relevant authority pursuant to paragraph 2, taking into account internationally agreed standards, in particular the denominators published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision for that year, and notify them to relevant authorities.
Zadevni organ rezultate zadevnih subjektov z dovoljenjem v njegovi jurisdikciji, vključene v vzorec, ki ga je sporočila EBA, izračuna najpozneje do 15. decembra vsakega leta.
The denominator of an indicator shall be the aggregate amount of the indicator values across all relevant entities and banks authorised in third countries in the sample, as reported for the relevant entities pursuant to paragraph 2 and disclosed by the banks authorised in third countries on 31 July of the relevant year.
Ko zadevni organ ob izvajanju premišljene nadzorniške presoje zadevni subjekt določi za GSPI v skladu s členom 131(10)(b) Direktive 2013/36/EU, zadevni organ najpozneje do 15. decembra vsakega leta EBA predloži podrobno izjavo o razlogih za njegovo oceno v pisni obliki.
Article 4
Določitev zadevnega subjekta za GSPI in razvrstitev v podkategorijo začne veljati 1. januarja drugega leta po koledarskem letu, v katerem so se določili imenovalci v skladu s členom 3.
Identification procedure
Člen 5
The relevant authority shall calculate the scores of the relevant entities that are included in the sample notified by the EBA, which are authorised in its jurisdiction, not later than 15 December of each year.
Določitev za GSPI, določitev rezultatov in razvrstitev v podkategorije