natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This will make it easier for shareholders to engage in a constructive dialogue with the company.
V zeleni knjigi iz leta 2011 je bilo ugotovljeno, da se izjave o upravljanju podjetij, ki jih podjetja objavljajo, očitno ne spremljajo, kot bi se morale, in da ima le malo držav članic javne ali specializirane organe, ki preverijo popolnost predloženih informacij, zlasti pojasnil.
An effective ‘comply or explain’ approach requires efficient monitoring to motivate businesses to comply with a corporate governance code or to explain non-compliance.
Različni akterji, kot so odbori, revizorji in delničarji, spremljajo informacije, ki jih razkrijejo podjetja.
The 2011 Green Paper indicated that the corporate governance statements which companies publish seemed not to be monitored as they should be and few Member States had public or specialised bodies check the completeness of the information provided, and in particular the explanations.
Odbori in delničarji imajo tudi pomembno vlogo pri spodbujanju kakovosti pojasnil.
Various actors, such as boards, auditors and shareholders, are involved in monitoring the information disclosed by companies.
Zlati aktivnejše spremljanje, ki ga izvajajo delničarji kot lastniki podjetij, bi lahko privedlo do boljših praks upravljanja podjetij.
Boards and shareholders also have an important role to play in encouraging good quality explanations.
Države članice in organe, odgovorne za kodekse o upravljanju podjetij, se tudi spodbuja, naj razmislijo, kako bi lahko več pozornosti namenili splošni kakovosti pojasnil o odstopanjih, ki jih predložijo podjetja v okviru obstoječih ureditev spremljanja v svojih državah.
In particular, more active monitoring by shareholders, as owners of companies, could lead to better corporate governance practices.
Obravnavale bi se lahko tudi dodatne spodbude za podjetja in druge zadevne strani, da bi se dodatno izboljšala kakovost pojasnil in poročanje o upravljanju podjetij na splošno.
Member States and bodies responsible for corporate governance codes are also encouraged to consider how more attention could be paid to the overall quality of explanations for departures submitted by companies in the context of the existing monitoring arrangements in their countries.
Da bi se zagotovilo učinkovito spremljanje izvajanja tega priporočila, bi morale države članice nanj opozoriti organe, pristojne za nacionalne kodekse o upravljanju podjetij, ki kotirajo na borzi, in druge zadevne strani.
Additional means of incentivising companies and other parties concerned could also be considered, to further improve the quality of the explanations and of corporate governance reporting in general.
Države članice bi morale tudi obvestiti Komisijo o ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s tem priporočilom –
In order to ensure efficient follow-up to this Recommendation, Member States should draw it to the attention of the bodies responsible for the national corporate governance codes, listed companies and other parties concerned.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJE PRIPOROČILO:
Member States should also inform the Commission about measures taken in accordance with this Recommendation,
ODDELEK I
HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:
Splošne določbe
SECTION I
Namen tega priporočila je zagotoviti smernice državam članicam, organom, pristojnim za nacionalne kodekse o upravljanju podjetij, podjetjem in drugim zadevnim stranem.
General provisions
Namen smernic je izboljšati splošno kakovost izjav o upravljanju podjetij, ki jih objavljajo podjetja v skladu s členom 20 Direktive 2013/34/EU, zlasti pa kakovost pojasnil, ki jih predložijo v primeru odstopanja od priporočil zadevnega kodeksa o upravljanju podjetij.
The purpose of this Recommendation is to provide guidance to Member States, bodies responsible for national corporate governance codes, companies and other parties concerned.
Priporočljivo je, da, kjer je primerno, kodeksi o upravljanju podjetij jasno razlikujejo med deli kodeksa, od katerih ni mogoče odstopati, deli, ki se uporabljajo na podlagi načela „upoštevaj ali pojasni“, in tistimi, ki se uporabljajo na prostovoljni osnovi.
The guidance aims to improve the overall quality of corporate governance statements published by companies in accordance with Article 20 of Directive 2013/34/EU and, specifically, the quality of explanations provided by companies in case of departure from the recommendations of the relevant corporate governance code.
ODDELEK II
It is recommended that, where applicable, corporate governance codes make a clear distinction between the parts of the code which cannot be derogated from, the parts which apply on a ‘comply or explain’ basis and those which apply on a purely voluntary basis.
Kakovost izjav o upravljanju
SECTION II
Člen 20(1) Direktive 2013/34/EU od podjetij, ki kotirajo na borzi, zahteva, naj v izjavi o upravljanju zagotovijo informacije o posebnih vidikih ureditev upravljanja.
Quality of corporate governance statements
Da bi se dodatno izboljšala preglednost za delničarje, vlagatelje in druge zainteresirane strani, bi morala podjetja poleg informacij o področjih iz odstavka 3 opisati, kako so uporabila zadevna priporočila iz kodeksa o upravljanju podjetja na področjih, ki so za delničarje najpomembnejša.
Article 20(1) of Directive 2013/34/EU requires listed companies to provide information about specific aspects of their corporate governance arrangements in their corporate governance statement.
Informacije iz odstavkov 3 in 4 bi morale biti dovolj jasne, natančne in celovite, da delničarjem, vlagateljem in drugim zainteresiranim stranem omogočijo dobro razumevanje načina upravljanja podjetja.
In order to further improve transparency for shareholders, investors and other stakeholders, and in addition to the information on the topics referred to in paragraph 3, companies should describe how they have applied the relevant corporate governance code recommendations on the topics of most importance for shareholders.
Poleg tega bi morale zajeti tudi posebne značilnosti in položaj podjetja, kot so velikost, struktura podjetja ali lastništvo ali katere koli druge zadevne značilnosti.
The information referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 should be sufficiently clear, accurate and comprehensive to enable shareholders, investors and other stakeholders to gain a good understanding of the manner in which the company is governed.
Da bi delničarjem, vlagateljem in drugim zainteresiranim stranem zagotovila lažji dostop, bi morala podjetja informacije iz odstavkov 3 in 4 redno dajati na voljo na svojih spletnih straneh in v svoje poročilo o upravljanju vključiti sklic na spletno stran, tudi če zagotavljajo informacije že z drugimi sredstvi, ki so določena v Direktivi 2013/34/EU.
In addition, it should refer to the company's specific characteristics and situation, such as size, company structure or ownership or any other relevant features.
ODDELEK III
In order to provide easier access for shareholders, investors and other stakeholders, companies should routinely make the information referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 available on their websites and include a reference to the website in their management report, even if they already provide information by other means specified in Directive 2013/34/EU.
Kakovost pojasnil pri odstopanju od kodeksa
SECTION III
Člen 20(1) Direktive 2013/34/EU od podjetij, ki kotirajo na borzi, zahteva, da predložijo pojasnila v primeru odstopanja od priporočil iz kodeksa, ki velja zanje ali katerega so se prostovoljno odločila uporabljati.
Quality of explanations in case of departure from a code
Za namen odstavka 7 bi morala podjetja jasno navesti, od katerih posebnih priporočil so odstopala in za vsako odstopanje od posameznega priporočila:
Article 20(1) of Directive 2013/34/EU requires listed companies to provide explanations in case of departure from the recommendations of the code to which they are subject or which they have voluntarily decided to apply.
razložiti, na kakšen način so odstopala od priporočila;
For the purpose of paragraph 7, companies should clearly state which specific recommendations they have departed from and, for each departure from an individual recommendation:
opisati razloge za odstopanje;
explain in what manner the company has departed from a recommendation;
opisati, kako je bila odločitev o odstopanju od priporočila sprejeta znotraj podjetja;
describe the reasons for the departure;
kadar je odstopanje časovno omejeno, pojasniti, kdaj namerava podjetje upoštevati določeno priporočilo;
describe how the decision to depart from the recommendation was taken within the company;
kjer je primerno, opisati nadomestni ukrep in pojasniti, kako ta dosega temeljni cilj posebnega priporočila ali kodeksa kot celote ali kako prispeva k dobremu upravljanju podjetja.
where the departure is limited in time, explain when the company envisages complying with a particular recommendation;
Informacije iz odstavka 8 bi morale biti dovolj jasne, natančne in celovite, da delničarjem, vlagateljem in drugim zainteresiranim stranem omogočijo, da ocenijo posledice odstopanja od določenega priporočila.
where applicable, describe the measure taken instead of compliance and explain how that measure achieves the underlying objective of the specific recommendation or of the code as a whole, or clarify how it contributes to good corporate governance of the company.
Prav tako bi morale zajeti posebne značilnosti in položaj podjetja, kot so velikost, struktura podjetja ali lastništvo ali katere koli druge zadevne značilnosti.
The information referred to in paragraph 8 should be sufficiently clear, accurate and comprehensive to enable shareholders, investors and other stakeholders to assess the consequences arising from the departure from a particular recommendation.
Pojasnila za odstopanja bi morala biti jasno predstavljena v izjavi o upravljanju podjetja, in sicer tako, da jih delničarji, vlagatelji in druge zainteresirane strani zlahka najdejo.
It should also refer to the specific characteristics and situation of the company, such as size, company structure or ownership or any other relevant features.
To je mogoče na primer tako, da se sledi vrstnemu redu priporočil v zadevnem kodeksu ali z združevanjem vseh pojasnil o odstopanjih v istem delu izjave o upravljanju podjetij, če je uporabljena metoda natančno pojasnjena.
Explanations for departures should be clearly presented in the corporate governance statement in such a way that they are easy to find for shareholders, investors and other stakeholders.
ODDELEK IV
This could be done, for example, by following the same order of recommendations as in the relevant code or by grouping all explanations for departure in the same section of the corporate governance statement, as long as the method used is clearly explained.
Končne določbe
SECTION IV
Za spodbujanje podjetij, da upoštevajo zadevni kodeks o upravljanju podjetja ali bolje pojasnijo odstopanja od njega, je treba na nacionalni ravni izvajati učinkovito spremljanje v okviru obstoječih ureditev spremljanja.
Final provisions
Države članice bi morale na to priporočilo opozoriti organe, pristojne za nacionalne kodekse o upravljanju podjetij, podjetja, ki kotirajo na borzi, in druge zadevne strani.
In order to motivate companies to comply with the relevant corporate governance code or to better explain departures from it, efficient monitoring needs to be carried out at national level, within the framework of the existing monitoring arrangements.
Države članice so pozvane, naj Komisijo obvestijo o ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s tem priporočilom, do 13. aprila 2015, da bo Komisija lahko spremljala in ocenjevala razmere.
Member States should draw this Recommendation to the attention of the bodies responsible for national corporate governance codes, listed companies and other parties concerned.
To priporočilo je naslovljeno na države članice, organe, pristojne za nacionalne kodekse o upravljanju podjetij, podjetja, ki kotirajo na borzi, in druge zadevne strani.
Member States are invited to inform the Commission of the measures taken in accordance with this Recommendation by 13 April 2015, in order to enable the Commission to monitor and assess the situation.
V Bruslju, 9. aprila 2014
This Recommendation is addressed to the Member States, bodies responsible for national corporate governance codes, listed companies and other parties concerned.
Za Komisijo
Done at Brussels, 9 April 2014.
Član Komisije
For the Commission
UL L 182, 29.6.2013, str. 19.
Member of the Commission
UL L 145, 30.4.2004, str. 1.
OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19.
COM(2011) 164 z dne 5. aprila 2011.
OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 29. marca 2012 o okviru za upravljanje evropskih podjetij (2011/2181(INI)).
COM(2011) 164 of 5 April 2011.
COM(2012) 740 z dne 12. decembra 2012.
European Parliament resolution of 29 March 2012 on a corporate governance framework for European companies, 2011/2181(INI).
Visoka kakovost razkritij glede ureditev upravljanja podjetij omogoča uporabne informacije vlagateljem in olajša njihove odločitve glede naložb.
COM(2012) 740 of 12 December 2012.
Poleg tega poveča zaupanje vlagateljev v podjetja, v katera vlagajo.
on principles for the protection of consumers and players of online gambling services and for the prevention of minors from gambling online
o načelih za varstvo potrošnikov in igralcev spletnih storitev iger na srečo ter onemogočanje dostopa do spletnih iger na srečo za mladoletnike
In 2011, the Commission held a public consultation on its ‘Green Paper on online gambling in the internal market’ [1].
Komisija je leta 2011 organizirala javno posvetovanje o „Zeleni knjigi o spletnih igrah na srečo na notranjem trgu“ [1].
It identified common objectives of the Member States regarding the regulation of online gambling services and helped to identify the key priority areas for Union action.
Poiskala je skupne cilje držav članic glede urejanja spletnih storitev iger na srečo in jim pomagala pri opredelitvi ključnih prednostnih področij za ukrepanje Unije.
In its Communication ‘Towards a comprehensive European Framework for online gambling’ adopted on 23 October 2012 [2], the Commission proposed a series of actions which seek to respond to the regulatory, societal and technical challenges of online gambling.
V sporočilu „Celovitemu evropskemu okviru za spletne igre na srečo naproti“, sprejetem 23. oktobra 2012, [2] je Komisija predlagala vrsto ukrepov, s katerimi se je želela odzvati na zakonodajne, družbene in tehnične izzive spletnih iger na srečo.
In particular, the Commission announced that it would present Recommendations on the protection of consumers in the area of online gambling services, including the protection of minors, and on responsible commercial communication of online gambling services.
Komisija je predvsem napovedala, da bo predložila priporočila o varstvu potrošnikov na področju spletnih iger na srečo, vključno z varstvom mladoletnikov, in o odgovornih komercialnih sporočilih glede spletnih storitev iger na srečo.
This Recommendation is designed to combine both those subject matters and to improve the protection of consumers, players and to prevent minors from gambling online.
To priporočilo je oblikovano tako, da združuje oba predmeta urejanja in izboljšuje varstvo potrošnikov in igralcev ter mladoletnikom preprečuje dostop do spletnih iger na srečo.
This Recommendation aims to ensure that gambling remains a source of entertainment, consumers are provided a safe gambling environment and measures are in place to counter the risk of financial or social harm as well as to set out action needed to prevent minors from gambling online.
Cilj tega priporočila je zagotoviti, da bi igre na srečo ostale vir zabave, da bi bilo potrošnikom na voljo regulirano okolje iger na srečo ter da bi bili sprejeti ukrepi za preprečevanje nevarnosti finančne ali socialne škode, hkrati pa določiti ukrepe, ki so potrebni za onemogočanje dostopa do spletnih iger na srečo za mladoletnike.
In its Resolution of 10 September 2013 on online gambling in the internal market, the European Parliament [3] called on the Commission to explore the possibility of interoperability between national self-exclusion registers, to raise awareness about the risks of gambling addiction and to consider compulsory third-party identification checks.
Evropski parlament je v Resoluciji z dne 10. septembra 2013 o spletnih igrah na srečo na notranjem trgu [3] Komisijo pozval, naj razišče možnosti za interoperabilnost med nacionalnimi registri samoizključitev, poveča ozaveščanje o nevarnostih odvisnosti od iger na srečo in razmisli o uvedbi obveznega preverjanja identitete s strani tretje osebe.
It also called for online gambling operators to be obliged to provide on the gambling website information on regulatory authorities and warnings to minors and the use of self-restrictions.
Zavzel se je tudi za to, da bi morali ponudniki spletnih iger na srečo na spletišču iger na srečo zagotoviti informacije o regulativnih organih in opozorilih za mladoletnike ter o uporabi samoomejitev.
In addition, the European Parliament called for common principles for responsible commercial communications.
Poleg tega je Evropski parlament pozval k sprejetju skupnih načel za odgovorno komercialno sporočanje.
It recommended that commercial communications should contain clear warnings as to the consequences of compulsive gambling and the risks of gambling addiction.
Priporočil je, da bi morala komercialna sporočila vključevati jasna opozorila o posledicah kompulzivnega igranja na srečo in nevarnostih zasvojenosti z igrami na srečo.
Commercial communications should be neither excessive nor displayed on content specifically targeted at minors or where there is a higher risk of targeting minors.
Komercialna sporočila ne bi smela biti prekomerna ali prikazana na vsebini, katere ciljna publika so zlasti mladoletniki oziroma pri kateri obstaja višje tveganje, da cilja na mladoletnike.
The European Economic and Social Committee has also called on the Commission to intervene to improve consumer protection as regards online gambling, and to protect minors [4].
Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor je prav tako pozval Komisijo, naj ukrepa za izboljšanje varstva potrošnikov v zvezi s spletnimi igrami na srečo in za varstvo mladoletnikov [4].
In the absence of harmonisation at Union level, Member States are in principle free to set the objectives of their policy on games of chance and to define the level of protection sought for the purpose of protecting the health of consumers.
Če ni usklajenosti na ravni Unije, države članice načeloma prosto določajo cilje svoje politike na področju iger na srečo in opredelijo želeno raven zaščite zaradi varovanja zdravja potrošnikov.
The Court of Justice of the European Union has provided general guidance on the interpretation of the fundamental freedoms of the internal market in the area of (online) gambling, taking into account the specific nature of gambling activities.
Sodišče Evropske unije je zagotovilo splošne smernice za razlago temeljnih svoboščin notranjega trga na področju (spletnih) iger na srečo, ob upoštevanju posebne narave iger na srečo.
While Member States may restrict or limit the cross-border supply of online gambling services on the basis of public interest objectives that they seek to protect, they are nonetheless to demonstrate the suitability and necessity of the measure in question.
Čeprav lahko države članice preprečijo ali omejijo čezmejno ponudbo spletnih storitev iger na srečo na podlagi ciljev v javnem interesu, ki jih želijo zaščititi, naj bi kljub temu dokazale primernost in nujnost zadevnega ukrepa.
Member States have a duty to demonstrate that the public interest objectives are being pursued in a consistent and systematic manner [5].
Države članice morajo dokazati, da se cilji v javnem interesu dosledno in sistematično izpolnjujejo.
Advertising by the holder of a public monopoly is to be measured and strictly limited to what is necessary in order to channel consumers towards controlled gaming networks.
Sodišče Evropske unije je prav tako oblikovalo temeljne predpise o komercialnih sporočilih za storitve iger na srečo, zlasti za tiste, ki se zagotavljajo v monopolnih razmerah.
Such advertising cannot aim to encourage consumers' natural propensity to gamble by stimulating their active participation in it, for example by trivialising gambling, or increasing the attractiveness of gambling by means of enticing advertising messages holding out the prospect of major winnings.
Oglaševanje nosilca javnega monopola mora biti premišljeno in strogo omejeno na tisto, kar je nujno za usmerjanje potrošnikov v nadzorovana igralna omrežja.
In particular, a distinction should be drawn between strategies of the holder of a monopoly that are intended solely to inform potential customers of the existence of products and serve to ensure regular access to games of chance by channelling gamblers into controlled circuits, and those which invite and encourage active participation in such games [6].
Takšno oglaševanje ne sme spodbujati naravne nagnjenosti potrošnikov k igranju iger na srečo s spodbujanjem njihove aktivne udeležbe, na primer z banaliziranjem iger na srečo oziroma s povečevanjem privlačnosti iger na srečo prek privlačnih oglasnih sporočil, ki poudarjajo možnost velikih dobitkov.
Protection of consumers and health are the main public interest objectives of Member States in the context of their national gambling frameworks addressing the prevention of problem gambling and the protection of minors.
Zlasti je treba razlikovati med strategijami nosilca monopola, ki so namenjene izključno obveščanju potencialnih kupcev o obstoju produktov in zagotavljajo reden dostop do iger na srečo z usmerjanjem igralcev v nadzorovane igralne okvire, ter tistimi, ki vabijo in spodbujajo aktivno udeležbo v tovrstnih igrah.
Action at Union level encourages Member States to provide a high level of protection throughout the Union, in particular in light of risks associated with gambling that include the development of a gambling disorder or to other negative personal and social consequences.
Varstvo potrošnikov in varovanje zdravja sta glavna cilja javnega interesa držav članic v okviru njihovih nacionalnih okvirov iger na srečo, ki obravnavajo preprečevanje problematičnega igranja na srečo ter varstvo mladoletnikov.
The aim of this Recommendation is to safeguard the health of consumers and players and thus also to minimise eventual economic harm that may result from compulsive or excessive gambling.
Pravila in politike, ki so jih države članice uvedle za doseganje ciljev v javnem interesu, se znatno razlikujejo.
To that end, it recommends principles for a high level of protection of consumers, players and minors as regards online gambling services.
Ukrepanje na ravni Unije spodbuja države članice k zagotavljanju visoke ravni varstva po vsej Uniji, zlasti glede na tveganja v zvezi z igrami na srečo, ki vključujejo razvoj motenj, povezanih z igrami na srečo, ali drugih negativnih osebnih in družbenih posledic.
In preparing this Recommendation, the Commission has drawn from good practices in the Member States.
Namen tega priporočila je zaščititi zdravje potrošnikov in igralcev ter čim bolj zmanjšati morebitno gospodarsko škodo, ki je lahko posledica kompulzivnega ali prekomernega igranja na srečo.
Online gambling services are widely offered and used.
Zato priporoča načela za visoko raven varstva potrošnikov, igralcev in mladoletnikov glede spletnih storitev iger na srečo.
However, misinformed choices can be made where information is not sufficiently clear or transparent.
Toda če informacije niso dovolj jasne ali pregledne, lahko pride do sprejetja zgrešenih odločitev.
In addition, online players look for competing gambling opportunities whenever they perceive a lack of attractive offers.
Poleg tega spletni igralci iščejo konkurenčne možnosti igranja na srečo, kadar se jim zdi, da primanjkuje privlačnih ponudb.