natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A major part of those costs can be attributed to inefficiencies in the roll-out process related to the use of existing passive infrastructure (such as ducts, conduits, manholes, cabinets, poles, masts, antenna installations, towers and other supporting constructions), bottlenecks related to coordination of civil works, burdensome administrative permit granting procedures, and bottlenecks concerning in-building deployment of networks, which lead to high financial barriers, in particular in rural areas.
Glavni del teh stroškov se lahko pripiše neučinkovitostim v postopku postavitve v zvezi z uporabo obstoječe pasivne infrastrukture (na primer kanalov, vodov, vstopnih jaškov, omaric, drogov, stebrov, anten, stolpov in drugih podpornih objektov), ozkim grlom, povezanim z usklajevanjem gradbenih del, zapletenim upravnim postopkom za izdajo dovoljenj in ozkim grlom, povezanim z napeljavo omrežij v stavbah, kar postavlja precejšnje finančne ovire predvsem za podeželska območja.
Measures aiming at increasing efficiency in the use of existing infrastructures and at reducing costs and obstacles in carrying out new civil engineering works should provide a substantial contribution to ensuring a fast and extensive deployment of high-speed electronic communications networks while maintaining effective competition, without adversely affecting the safety, security and smooth operation of the existing public infrastructure.
Ukrepi, ki so namenjeni povečanju učinkovitosti uporabe obstoječe infrastrukture in zmanjšanju stroškov ter ovir pri izvajanju novih gradbenih del nizke gradnje, bi morali znatno prispevati k hitri in obsežni postavitvi elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij visokih hitrosti ob hkratnem ohranjanju učinkovite konkurence, ne da bi to negativno vplivalo na zaščito, varnost in brezhibno delovanje obstoječe javne infrastrukture.
Some Member States have adopted measures intended to reduce the costs of broadband roll-out.
Nekatere države članice so sprejele ukrepe za znižanje stroškov postavitve širokopasovnega omrežja.
However those measures remain scarce and scattered.
Vendar pa takšni ukrepi ostajajo redki in razpršeni.
Scaling up those measures across the Union could significantly contribute to the establishment of a digital single market.
Z okrepitvijo teh ukrepov v celotni Uniji bi lahko znatno pripomogli k vzpostavitvi enotnega digitalnega trga.
Moreover differences in regulatory requirements sometimes prevent cooperation across utilities and may raise barriers to entry for new network operators and new business opportunities, hindering the development of an internal market for use and deployment of physical infrastructures for high-speed electronic communications networks.
Poleg tega razlike v regulativnih zahtevah včasih preprečujejo sodelovanje med drugimi komunalnimi sektorji in lahko ustvarijo ovire za vstop novih omrežnih operaterjev ter nove poslovne priložnosti, kar ovira razvoj notranjega trga za uporabo in izgradnjo fizične infrastrukture za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja visokih hitrosti.
Finally, the initiatives at Member State level do not always seem to be holistic, whereas it is essential to take action across the whole roll-out process, and across sectors, in order to achieve a coherent and significant impact.
Pobude se na ravni držav članic ne zdijo vedno celovite, za celosten in znaten učinek pa je ključno, da sprejeti ukrepi zadevajo celoten postopek postavitve in vse sektorje.
This Directive aims at laying down some minimum rights and obligations applicable across the Union in order to facilitate the roll-out of high-speed electronic communications networks and cross-sector coordination.
Namen te direktive je določiti nekatere minimalne pravice in obveznosti, ki bi veljale v celotni Uniji, da se pospeši postavitev elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij visokih hitrosti in medsektorsko sodelovanje.
While ensuring a minimum level playing field, this should be without prejudice to existing best practices and measures adopted at national and local level entailing more detailed provisions and conditions as well as additional measures complementing those rights and obligations, in accordance with the subsidiarity principle.
Zagotavljati bi morala minimalno usklajenost konkurenčnih pogojev, vendar to v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti ne bi smelo posegati v obstoječe najboljše prakse in ukrepe, sprejete na nacionalni ter lokalni ravni, ki vsebujejo podrobnejše določbe in pogoje, ter dodatne ukrepe, ki dopolnjujejo navedene pravice in obveznosti.
In the light of the lex specialis principle, when more specific regulatory measures in conformity with Union law apply, those should prevail over the minimum rights and obligations provided for in this Directive.
Kadar se v skladu s pravom Unije uporabljajo bolj specifični regulativni ukrepi, bi morali ti glede na načelo lex specialis prevladati nad minimalnimi pravicami in obveznostmi iz te direktive.
Therefore this Directive should be without prejudice to the Union regulatory framework for electronic communications set out in Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] as well as Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [6], Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [7], Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [8] and Commission Directive 2002/77/EC [9], including national measures adopted pursuant to that regulatory framework, such as specific symmetric or asymmetric regulatory measures.
Zato ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v regulativni okvir Unije za elektronske komunikacije iz Direktive 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5] ter Direktive 2002/19/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [6], Direktive 2002/20/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [7], Direktive 2002/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [8] in Direktive Komisije 2002/77/ES [9], vključno z nacionalnimi ukrepi, sprejetimi v skladu z navedenim regulativnim okvirom, kot na primer specifičnimi simetričnimi ali asimetričnimi regulativnimi ukrepi.
It can be significantly more efficient for electronic communications network operators, in particular new entrants, to re-use existing physical infrastructures, including those of other utilities, in order to roll out electronic communications networks, in particular in areas where no suitable electronic communications network is available or where it may not be economically feasible to build up a new physical infrastructure.
Za operaterje elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, zlasti nove operaterje, je lahko učinkoviteje, če pri postavitvi elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij uporabijo obstoječo fizično infrastrukturo, vključno s tisto iz drugih komunalnih sektorjev, zlasti na območjih, na katerih ni na voljo ustreznega elektronskega komunikacijskega omrežja ali kjer postavitev nove fizične infrastrukture ni gospodarsko izvedljiva.
Moreover, synergies across sectors may significantly reduce the need for civil works due to the deployment of electronic communications networks and therefore also the social and environmental costs linked to them, such as pollution, nuisances and traffic congestion.
Poleg tega lahko sinergije med sektorji znatno zmanjšajo potrebo po gradbenih delih za postavitev elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in s tem tudi socialne in okoljske stroške, povezane z njimi, na primer zaradi onesnaževanja, motenja in prometnih zastojev.
Therefore this Directive should apply not only to public communications network providers but to any owner or holder of rights to use, in the latter case without prejudice to any third party's property rights, extensive and ubiquitous physical infrastructures suitable to host electronic communications network elements, such as physical networks for the provision of electricity, gas, water and sewage and drainage systems, heating and transport services.
Zato se ta direktiva ne bi uporabljala samo za ponudnike javnih komunikacijskih omrežij, ampak za vse lastnike ali imetnike pravic uporabe obsežne in povsod razširjene fizične infrastrukture – v primeru imetnikov pravic uporabe brez poseganja v lastninske pravice tretje strani – ki je primerna za namestitev elementov elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, na primer fizičnih omrežij za oskrbo z električno energijo, plinom in vodo, za kanalizacijo in drenažne sisteme, ogrevanje ter prevozne storitve.
With a view to improving the deployment of high-speed electronic communications networks in the internal market, this Directive should lay down rights for public communications network providers to access physical infrastructure irrespective of its location under fair and reasonable terms consistent with the normal exercise of property rights.
Zaradi pospešitve postavitve elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij visokih hitrosti na notranjem trgu bi bilo treba v tej direktivi določiti pravico ponudnikov javnih komunikacijskih omrežij glede dostopa do fizične infrastrukture, in sicer neodvisno od njene lokacije ter pod poštenimi in razumnimi pogoji v skladu z normalnim uresničevanjem lastninskih pravic.
The obligation to give access to the physical infrastructure should be without prejudice to the rights of the owner of the land or of the building in which the infrastructure is located.
Obveznost zagotovitve dostopa do fizične infrastrukture ne bi smela posegati v pravice lastnikov zemljišča ali stavbe, kjer je infrastruktura nameščena.
In view of their low degree of differentiation, the physical facilities of a network can often host a wide range of electronic communications network elements at the same time, including those capable of delivering broadband access services at speeds of at least 30 Mbps in line with the technological neutrality principle, without affecting the main service conveyed and with minimum adaptation costs.
Zaradi nizke stopnje diferenciacije je lahko v fizičnih delih omrežja pogosto hkrati nameščen širok nabor elementov elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, tudi takšnih, ki lahko v skladu z načelom tehnološke nevtralnosti zagotavljajo širokopasovne storitve dostopa pri hitrostih najmanj 30 Mb/s, ne da bi vplivali na opravljanje glavne storitve in ob minimalnih stroških za prilagoditev.
Therefore, a physical infrastructure that is intended to only host other elements of a network without becoming itself an active network element, such as in the case of dark fibre, can in principle be used to accommodate electronic communications cables, equipment or any other element of electronic communications networks, regardless of its actual use or its ownership, in the absence of any security concerns or prejudice to the future business interests of the owner of the infrastructure.
Zato lahko fizična infrastruktura, ki je namenjena samo namestitvi drugih elementov omrežja, ne da bi sama postala aktiven element omrežja, kot to postanejo na primer neuporabljena optična vlakna, načeloma sprejme elektronske komunikacijske kable, opremo ali druge elemente elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, ne glede na njeno dejansko uporabo ali lastništvo, če ni nikakršnih varnostnih zadržkov ali to ne škoduje prihodnjim poslovnim interesom lastnikov infrastrukture.
The physical infrastructure of public communications networks can in principle also be used to accommodate elements of other networks, and therefore Member States may choose to apply the principle of reciprocity in appropriate cases, and allow public communications network operators to offer access to their networks for the deployment of other networks.
Fizična infrastruktura javnih komunikacijskih omrežij bi načeloma lahko sprejela tudi elemente drugih omrežij, zato se lahko države članice odločijo, da v ustreznih primerih uporabijo načelo vzajemnosti, s čimer bi operaterjem javnih komunikacijskih omrežij omogočili, da zagotavljajo dostop do svojega omrežja za postavitev drugih omrežij.
Without prejudice to the pursuit of the specific general interest linked to the provision of the main service, synergies across network operators should be encouraged in order to contribute to achieving the targets of the Digital Agenda at the same time.
Brez poseganja v vsakokratni splošni interes v zvezi z opravljanjem glavne storitve bi bilo treba spodbujati sinergije med omrežnimi operaterji, da bi pripomogli k hkratnemu uresničevanju ciljev Digitalne agende.
While this Directive should be without prejudice to any specific safeguard needed to ensure safety and public health, the security and integrity of the networks, in particular that of critical infrastructure, and to ensure that the main service provided by the network operator is not affected, in particular in networks used for the provision of water intended for human consumption, general rules in national legislation prohibiting network operators from negotiating access to physical infrastructures by electronic communications network providers could prevent the establishment of a market for access to physical infrastructures.
Ta direktiva sicer ne bi smela posegati v posebne zaščitne ukrepe za zagotavljanje varnosti, javnega zdravja, varnosti in celovitosti omrežij, zlasti kritične infrastrukture, ter za preprečevanje vpliva na glavno storitev, ki jo opravlja omrežni operater, zlasti pri omrežjih za oskrbo z vodo, namenjeno za prehrano ljudi, vendar bi lahko splošna pravila nacionalne zakonodaje, ki omrežnim operaterjem prepovedujejo pogajanja s ponudniki elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij glede dostopa do fizične infrastrukture, onemogočila razvoj trga za dostop do fizične infrastrukture.
Such general rules should therefore be abolished.
Zato bi bilo treba takšna splošna pravila odpraviti.
At the same time, the measures set out in this Directive should be without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to render the provision of infrastructure access by utilities operators more attractive by excluding revenues stemming from that service from the basis for the calculation of end-user tariffs for their main activity or activities, in accordance with applicable Union law.
Poleg tega ukrepi iz te direktive ne bi smeli posegati v možnost držav članic, da v skladu z veljavnim pravom Unije povečajo privlačnost zagotavljanja dostopa do infrastrukture za komunalna podjetja, tako da prihodke, ki izvirajo iz te storitve, izključijo iz osnove za izračun tarife za končne uporabnike za njihovo glavno dejavnost ali dejavnosti.
A network operator may refuse access to specific physical infrastructures for objective reasons.
Omrežni operater lahko iz objektivnih razlogov zavrne dostop do določene fizične infrastrukture.
In particular, a physical infrastructure may not be technically suitable due to specific circumstances concerning infrastructures for which access has been requested, such as lack of currently available space or due to future needs for space which are sufficiently demonstrated, for instance by publicly available investment plans.
Tako na primer fizična infrastruktura lahko ne bi bila tehnično primerna zaradi posebnih okoliščin v zvezi z infrastrukturo, do katere je bil zaprošen dostop, na primer zaradi trenutnega pomanjkanja ustreznega prostora ali zaradi načrtov, da se ta prostor uporabi za druge namene, kar je mogoče zadostno dokazati, na primer z javno dostopnimi naložbenimi načrti.
Similarly, in specific circumstances, sharing the infrastructure may jeopardise safety or public health, network integrity and security, including that of critical infrastructure, or may endanger the provision of services that are primarily provided over the same infrastructure.
Podobno bi lahko v posebnih okoliščinah souporaba infrastrukture ogrozila varnost ali javno zdravje, celovitost in varnost omrežja, vključno s kritično infrastrukturo, ali bi ogrozila opravljanje storitev, ki se primarno zagotavljajo z uporabo iste infrastrukture.
Moreover, when the network operator already provides wholesale physical network infrastructure access that would meet the needs of the access seeker, access to the underlying physical infrastructure may have an adverse economic impact on its business model and incentives to invest while possibly entailing an inefficient duplication of network elements.
Poleg tega ima lahko dostop do osnovne fizične infrastrukture v primerih, ko omrežni operater že zagotavlja veleprodajni dostop do fizične omrežne infrastrukture, ki bi ustrezal potrebam prosilcev za dostop, negativen ekonomski učinek na poslovni model omrežnega operaterja in ga odvrača od naložb, hkrati pa se poveča verjetnost neučinkovitega podvajanja elementov omrežja.
At the same time in the case of physical infrastructure access obligations imposed pursuant to the Union regulatory framework for electronic communications, such as those on undertakings having significant market power, this would be already covered by specific regulatory obligations that should not be affected by this Directive.
Poleg tega so obveznosti glede dostopa do fizične infrastrukture, predpisane na podlagi regulativnega okvira Unije za elektronske komunikacije, na primer za podjetja s pomembno tržno močjo, že zajete v posebnih regulativnih obveznostih, na katere ta direktiva ne bi smela imeti vpliva.
Where undertakings providing or authorised to provide public communications networks request access in a specified area, network operators should make an offer for the shared use of their facilities under fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including price, unless access is refused for objective reasons.
Kadar podjetja, ki zagotavljajo javna komunikacijska omrežja ali so za to pooblaščena, zaprosijo za dostop na določenem območju, bi morali omrežni operaterji pripraviti ponudbo za souporabo zmogljivosti pod poštenimi in razumnimi pogoji, vključno s ceno, razen če se dostop ne zavrne zaradi objektivnih razlogov.
Depending on the circumstances, several elements could influence the conditions under which such access is granted, such as: any additional maintenance and adaptation costs; any preventive safeguards to be adopted to limit adverse impacts on network safety, security and integrity; any specific liability arrangements in the event of damages; the use of any public subsidy granted for the construction of the infrastructure, including specific terms and conditions attached to the subsidy or provided under national law in compliance with Union law; the ability to deliver or provide infrastructure capacity to meet public service obligations; any constraints stemming from national provisions aiming at protecting the environment, public health, public security or to meet town and country planning objectives.
Odvisno od okoliščin bi lahko več elementov vplivalo na pogoje, pod katerimi se dostop odobri, na primer: morebitni dodatni stroški vzdrževanja in prilagoditve; morebitni preventivni zaščitni ukrepi, ki jih je treba sprejeti zaradi omejevanja škodljivih vplivov na zaščito, varnost in celovitost omrežja; morebitne posebne določbe o odgovornosti v primeru škode; uporaba morebitnih javnih subvencij, odobrenih za postavitev infrastrukture, vključno s posebnimi pogoji, ki so vezani na subvencije ali pa določeni v nacionalnem pravu v skladu s pravom Unije; zmožnost zgraditi ali zagotoviti infrastrukturno zmogljivost za izpolnjevanje ali zagotavljanje obveznosti javnih storitev; katere koli omejitve, ki izvirajo iz nacionalnih določb, katerih namen je varstvo okolja, javnega zdravja, javne varnosti ali izpolnitev ciljev iz prostorskega načrtovanja.
In the event of a disagreement during the commercial negotiation on technical and commercial terms and conditions, each party should be able to call on a dispute settlement body at national level to impose a solution on the parties, in order to avoid unjustified refusals to deal or the imposition of unreasonable conditions.
Zaradi izogibanja neupravičenim zavrnitvam poslovanja ali nerazumnim pogojem bi morala vsaka stranka imeti možnost, da se v primeru nesporazuma med poslovnimi pogajanji o tehničnih in tržnih pogojih obrne na nacionalni ravni na organ za reševanje sporov, ki strankam določi rešitev.
When determining prices for granting access, the dispute settlement body should ensure that the access provider has a fair opportunity to recover its costs incurred in providing access to its physical infrastructure, taking into account specific national conditions and any tariff structures put in place to provide a fair opportunity for cost recovery taking into account any previous imposition of remedies by a national regulatory authority.
Ko določa cene za dostop, bi moral organ za reševanje sporov zagotoviti, da ima ponudnik storitve razumne možnosti za kritje stroškov, ki mu pri tem nastanejo pri zagotavljanju dostopa do fizične infrastrukture, pri tem pa upoštevati posebne razmere v državi in vse morebitne tarifne strukture, ki so bile – glede na katere koli prejšnje ukrepe, ki so jih naložili nacionalni regulativni organi – uvedene zaradi zagotavljanja razumnih možnosti za kritje stroškov.
In so doing, the dispute settlement body should also take into account the impact of the requested access on the business plan of the access provider, including the investments made by the access provider to whom the access is requested, in particular investments made in the physical infrastructure to which the access is requested.
Organ za reševanje sporov bi moral pri tem upoštevati tudi učinek zadevnega dostopa na poslovni načrt ponudnika dostopa, vključno z naložbami ponudnika dostopa, ki je bil zaprošen, da omogoči dostop, zlasti pa naložbami v fizično infrastrukturo, do katere je bil zaprošen dostop.
In the specific case of access to physical infrastructures of public communications network providers, the investments made in such infrastructure may directly contribute to the objectives of the Digital Agenda and downstream competition may be influenced by free-riding.
V posebnem primeru dostopa do fizične infrastrukture ponudnikov javnih komunikacijskih omrežij lahko izvedene naložbe v to infrastrukturo neposredno prispevajo k uresničevanju ciljev Digitalne agende, na konkurenco na koncu prodajne verige pa lahko vpliva neupravičeno okoriščanje.
Hence, any access obligation should fully take into account the economic viability of those investments based on their risk profile, any time schedule for the return on investment, any impact of access on downstream competition and consequently on prices and return on investment, any depreciation of the network assets at the time of the access request, any business case underpinning the investment, in particular in the physical infrastructures used for the provision of high-speed electronic communications services, and any possibility previously offered to the access seeker to co-deploy.
Zato bi bilo treba pri obveznosti dostopa v celoti upoštevati ekonomsko upravičenost teh naložb, in sicer na podlagi njihovih profilov tveganja, dinamike donosov naložbe, kakršnega koli vpliva na konkurenco na naslednjih stopnjah prodajne verige in s tem na cene in donosnost naložbe, amortizacije sredstev omrežja v času, ko je oddana prošnja za dostop, katerega koli posla, ki je bil podlaga naložbi, zlasti v fizično infrastrukturo, ki se uporablja za opravljanje elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev visokih hitrosti, in katere koli možnosti za skupno postavitev, ki je bila predhodno ponujena prosilcu za dostop.
In order to effectively plan the deployment of high-speed electronic communications networks and to ensure the most effective use of existing infrastructures suitable for rolling out electronic communications networks, undertakings providing or authorised to provide public communications networks should be able to have access to minimum information concerning physical infrastructures available in the area of deployment.
Zaradi učinkovitega načrtovanja postavitve elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij visokih hitrosti in čim bolj učinkovite rabe obstoječe infrastrukture, primerne za postavitev elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, bi morala podjetja, ki zagotavljajo javna komunikacijska omrežja ali so za to pooblaščena, imeti možnost dostopa do osnovnih informacij o fizični infrastrukturi, ki je na razpolago na območju postavitve.