natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was found that one of the sampled groups of exporting producers, i.e. LDK Solar, received regularly significant electricity fee subsidies from the Financial Bureau of Xin Yu Economic Zone.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je ena od vzorčenih skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov, tj. LDK Solar, redno prejemala znatne subvencije za pristojbine za električno energijo od finančnega urada gospodarske cone mesta Xin Yu.
Although in this case the company did not benefit directly from the lower electricity rate than otherwise available on the market, the significant rebates provided by the Financial Bureau of Xin Yu Economic Zone eventually resulted in a situation where the company received benefits from the provision of cheap electricity and are thus functionally equivalent to government provision at below-market prices.
Kljub temu, da družba v tem primeru ni imela neposredne ugodnosti od cen električne energije, ki so nižje od cen na trgu, so precejšnja znižanja, ki jih je zagotovil finančni urad gospodarske cone Xin Yu, na koncu ustvarila položaj, v katerem je imela družba ugodnosti od zagotavljanja poceni električne energije, in so zato funkcionalno enakovredna zagotavljanju po cenah, ki so nižje od tržnih cen, s strani vlade.
In any event, even if the rebate is considered as a grant, the measure is closely connected to the complainant's allegation and falls within the scope of the investigation.
V vsakem primeru, tudi če se znižanja obravnavajo kot nepovratna sredstva, je ukrep tesno povezan s trditvijo pritožnika in spada v obseg preiskave.
In fact, the company concerned in the LDK Group received a near total refund of its electricity fees due in the IP.
Dejansko je bil zadevni družbi v skupini LDK v OP povrnjen skoraj celoten znesek njenih pristojbin za električno energijo.
LDK Solar group received, through its related polysilicon producer, a financial contribution in the sense of Article 3(1)(a)(iii) of the basic Regulation in that that local government provided electricity fee subsidies, or in the sense of Article 3(1)(a)(i).
Skupina LDK Solar je prek svojega povezanega proizvajalca polisilicija prejela finančni prispevek v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe, ker mu je lokalna vlada zagotovila subvencionirane pristojbine za električno energijo, ali v smislu člena 3(1)(a)(i).
This constitutes a government financial contribution in the form of provision of goods other than general infrastructure within the meaning of the basic regulation.
To se šteje kot finančni prispevek vlade v obliki zagotavljanja blaga, ki ni splošna infrastruktura v smislu osnovne uredbe.
Alternatively, it is a direct transfer of funds.
Po drugi strani pa gre za neposreden prenos sredstev.
LDK Solar received a benefit within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the basic Regulation to the extent that the government has provided electricity for less than adequate remuneration.
Skupina LDK Solar je prejela ugodnosti v smislu člena 3(2) osnovne uredbe glede na to, da ji je vlada zagotavljala električno energijo za manj kot ustrezno nadomestilo.
It has been established that this exporter was, because of the electricity fee subsidies, effectively subject to a rate lower than the rate generally available.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se je zaradi subvencij za pristojbine za električno energijo za tega izvoznika dejansko uporabljala cena, ki je nižja od običajne cene.
The direct transfer of funds confers a benefit because it is a non-repayable grant not available on the market.
Neposredni prenos sredstev prinaša ugodnosti, ker gre za nepovratna sredstva, ki na trgu niso na voljo.
The subsidy in form of provision of the cheap electricity by means of a rebate to one of the sampled producers is specific within the meaning of Article 4(2)(a) of the basic Regulation as the electricity fees subsidies have only been paid to LDK.
Subvencija v obliki zagotavljanja poceni električne energije prek znižanj za enega od vzorčenih proizvajalcev je specifična v smislu člena 4(2)(a) osnovne uredbe, saj so bile subvencije za pristojbine za električno energijo izplačane samo skupini LDK.
The subsidy is also regionally specific to certain enterprises within the Xin YU Economic zone.
Subvencija je tudi regionalno specifična, saj je omejena na določena podjetja v gospodarski coni Xin Yu.
The non-cooperation of LDK and the GOC in reporting this subsidy has led to the above findings being made on the basis of facts available.
Ker LDK in kitajska vlada nista poročali o tej subvenciji, je bilo treba zgoraj navedene ugotovitve utemeljiti na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
The subsidy amount was equal to the amount of the rebate covering the IP period.
Znesek subvencije je bil enak znesku znižanj v OP.
Electricity at LTAR
Družba/skupina
The complainant alleged that Chinese producers of the product concerned receive land-use rights from the GOC for less than adequate remuneration in that the national or local governments do not provide the rights consistent with market principles.
Pritožnik je trdil, da je kitajska vlada kitajskim proizvajalcem zadevnega izdelka zagotovila pravice do uporabe zemljišč za manj kot ustrezno nadomestilo glede na to, da nacionalne ali lokalne vlade v skladu s tržnimi načeli ne zagotavljajo takšnih pravic.
The GOC claimed that there is a standardised and orderly competitive land market in which land use rights must be publicly traded in accordance with the law in the land market.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da je trg zemljišč standardiziran in urejeno konkurenčen ter da je s pravicami do uporabe zemljišča v skladu z zakonom treba javno trgovati na trgu zemljišč.
The GOC also stated that industrial and commercial land should be obtained by compensation for the use in open market by bidding, auction and competition and ‘regardless of the number of bids or the initial price, the price finally paid is representative of the market price which is determined by free market supply and demand’.
Kitajska vlada je tudi izjavila, da je treba industrijska in trgovinska zemljišča pridobiti prek nadomestila za uporabo na odprtem trgu, ki se pridobi na razpisih, dražbah in natečajih, ter da je končna cena „ne glede na število ponudb ali prvotno ceno reprezentativna za tržne cene, ki se določajo glede na ponudbo in povpraševanje na prostem trgu“.
The GOC also claimed that the LUR transfer shall not include restrictions in the announcement of transfer through tendering, auction and quotation that affect fair competition.
Kitajska vlada je trdila tudi, da prenos pravic do uporabe zemljišč ne sme vključevati omejitev pri objavi prenosa prek javnega razpisa, dražbe in ponudbe, ki bi lahko vplivale na pošteno konkurenco.
The GOC did not provide any data with respect to the actual land-use rights prices and initial land prices formulated by the government.
Kitajska vlada ni predložila nobenih podatkov v zvezi z dejanskimi cenami pravic do uporabe zemljišč in začetnimi cenami zemljišč, ki jih je določila vlada.
The information provided by the GOC in respect of LUR transactions as requested in the questionnaire was incomplete.
Informacije, ki jih je zagotovila glede poslov s pravicami do uporabe zemljišč, so bile glede na zahteve v vprašalniku nepopolne.
When correcting its initial reply to the questionnaire during the verification visit, it also confirmed that some of the reported transactions were subject to bidding procedure.
Ko je med preveritvenim obiskom popravljala svoj prvotni izpolnjeni vprašalnik, je potrdila tudi, da so bili nekateri sporočeni posli predmet razpisnih postopkov.
However, no details on the number of bids and the difference between initial and final price, as requested in the questionnaire, was provided.
Vendar ni predložila nobenih podrobnih podatkov o številu ponudb ter razliki med začetno in končno ceno, ki so bili zahtevani v vprašalniku.
During the verification the Commission requested from the GOC evidence to support its claims concerning the transfers of LUR in China is assigned through bidding, quotation or auction.
Komisija je med preveritvenim obiskom od kitajske vlade zahtevala dokaze, ki bi podprli njeno trditev, da prenosi pravic do uporabe zemljišč na Kitajskem potekajo prek razpisov, ponudb ali dražb.
It is noted that according to Article 11 of Provisions on Assignment of the State-owned Construction Land Use Right through Bid Invitation, Auction and Quotation the responsible state authority issues public notice whenever the bidding/auction/quotation process takes place.
Opozoriti je treba, da v skladu s členom 11 določb o dodeljevanju pravic do uporabe državnih stavbnih zemljišč prek razpisa za oddajo ponudb, dražbe in ponudbe pristojni državni organ izda javno obvestilo, ko se začne razpisni/dražbeni/ponudbeni postopek.
On this basis, the Commission requested all public notices for the transactions which were subject to these procedures in order to collect and verify information requested in the questionnaire.
Na podlagi tega je Komisija zahtevala vse javne objave za posle, ki so bili predmet teh postopkov, da bi zbrala in preverila informacije, zahtevane v vprašalniku.
The GOC did not provide any of these notices as it claimed that ‘they do not exist anymore’.
Kitajska vlada ni predložila nobenega od teh obvestil, saj je trdila, da „ne obstajajo več“.
As a result the Commission was unable to verify the information concerning the LUR transactions of sampled exporting producers.
Zato Komisija ni mogla preveriti informacij glede poslov s pravicami do uporabe zemljišč vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The Commission informed the GOC of its consideration to apply provisions of Article 28 of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 in respect to this subsidy scheme and since the GOC in its reply to Commission letter of 23 May 2013 did not provide a satisfactory explanation or any new evidence concerning this issue, the Commission had to base its findings on the best facts available, i.e. in this case on the information submitted by the sampled exporting producers and other publicly available information.
Komisija je kitajsko vlado obvestila, da razmišlja o uporabi določb člena 28 Uredbe (ES) št. 597/2009 za to subvencijsko shemo in da je morala glede na to, da kitajska vlada v svojem odgovoru na dopis Komisije z dne 23. maja 2013 ni zagotovila zadovoljive obrazložitve ali novih dokazov v zvezi s tem vprašanjem, svoje ugotovitve utemeljiti na najboljših razpoložljivih dejstvih, v tem primeru na informacijah, ki so jih predložili vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki, in drugih dostopnih informacijah.
Although this was only an assumption and by no means a finding or conclusion at the time when the questionnaire was sent to the GOC, the GOC expressed its view that this assumption is false and did not provide any concrete information on possible benchmarks.
Čeprav je ob pošiljanju vprašalnika kitajski vladi šlo le za domnevo in nikakor ugotovitev ali sklep, je kitajska vlada izrazila svoje stališče, da je ta domneva napačna, in ni posredovala nobenih konkretnih informacij o morebitnih referenčnih vrednostih.
The GOC only submitted that ‘to the extent that any benchmark should be used, it should be the prices that Chinese industries which are not favoured would have to pay for similar land’.
Kitajska vlada je navedla le, da „če je treba uporabiti referenčne vrednosti, je treba uporabiti cene, ki jih morajo za podobna zemljišča plačati kitajske industrije, ki ne prejemajo ugodnosti“.
Since the GOC did not disclose which industries are not ‘favoured’ and neither did it provide any information on prices which these industries are paying for industrial land in China, the Commission was unable to assess whether they constitute a suitable benchmark.
Ker Kitajska vlada ni razkrila, katere industrije ne „prejemajo ugodnosti“, niti ni predložila informacij o cenah, ki jih te industrije plačujejo za industrijska zemljišča na Kitajskem, Komisija ni mogla presoditi, ali so te cene ustrezne referenčne vrednosti.
In this respect it is noted that in its previous investigations concerning Coated Fine Paper and Organic Coated Steel the Commission found that the provision of LUR to these industries also does not respect market principles.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da je Komisija v svojih prejšnjih preiskavah v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem in jeklom, prevlečenim z organskimi premazi, ugotovila, da zagotavljanje pravic do uporabe zemljišč tem industrijam prav tako ne upošteva tržnih načel.
The land-use right provision in China falls under Land Administration Law of the People's Republic of China.
Za zagotavljanje pravic do uporabe zemljišč na Kitajskem se uporablja zakon Ljudske republike Kitajske o upravljanju zemljišč.
The State authorities can assign such rights through public bidding, quotation or auction.
Državni organi lahko takšne pravice dodelijo prek javnih razpisov, ponudb ali dražb.
As mentioned above the GOC claimed that the land-use rights in China are assigned through bidding, auction and competition.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, je kitajska vlada trdila, da se pravice do uporabe zemljišč na Kitajskem dodelijo prek javnih razpisov, dražb ali natečajev.
This is also provided for in the Article 137 of the Real Right Law of the People's Republic of China.
To določa tudi člen 137 zakona Ljudske republike Kitajske o stvarnih pravicah.
However, it was found that this system as described by the GOC does not always work in the same way in practice.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da ta sistem, kot ga je opisala kitajska vlada, v praksi ne deluje vedno enako.
During the verification of sampled exporting producers, the Commission obtained some notices issued by relevant authorities concerning LUR available for transfer.
Komisija je med preverjanjem vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zbrala nekaj obvestil pristojnih organov o pravicah do uporabe zemljišč, ki so na voljo za prenos.
While one notice specifically limits the potential buyers of the LUR to the photovoltaic industry [81], another sets limits to the price initially set by the authorities and does not allow the market to determine the price.
Medtem ko eno obvestilo potencialne kupce pravic do uporabe zemljišč izrecno omejuje na fotonapetostno industrijo [81], drugo omejuje ceno, ki so jo na začetku določili pristojni organi, in ne dopušča, da bi ceno določil trg [82].
The auctions themselves were not seen to provide a real competition because in many of the examples viewed during the on spot verifications of exporting producers only one company made a bid (only the sampled PV producer) and therefore their opening bid (the value set by the local Land Bureau) formed the final price per square metre.
Za same dražbe se je štelo, da niso zagotavljale prave konkurence, saj je v mnogih primerih, obravnavanih med preveritvenimi obiski v prostorih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, dala ponudbo le ena družba (samo vzorčeni proizvajalec fotonapetostnih izdelkov) in je bila zato njena začetna ponudba (vrednost, ki jo je določil urad za zemljišča) tudi končna cena za kvadratni meter.
The above evidence contradicts the claims of the GOC that the prices paid for LUR in the PRC are representative of the market price which is determined by free market supply and demand and that LUR transfer shall not include restrictions in the announcement of transfer through tendering, auction and quotation that affect fair competition.
Navedeni dokazi nasprotujejo trditvam kitajske vlade, da so cene pravic do uporabe zemljišč v LRK reprezentativne za tržne cene, ki se določajo glede na ponudbo in povpraševanje na prostem trgu, ter da prenos pravic do uporabe zemljišč ne sme vključevati omejitev pri objavi prenosa prek javnega razpisa, dražbe in ponudbe, ki bi lahko vplivale na pošteno konkurenco.
It was also found that some sampled exporting producers received refunds from local authorities to compensate for the (already low) prices which they paid for the LURs.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da so nekateri vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki od lokalnih organov prejeli nadomestila za (že tako nizke) cene, ki so jih plačali za pravice do uporabe zemljišč.
In addition to the low prices, some of the sampled exporting producers received other funds related to the purchase of LURs which effectively decreased the actual price paid for the LURs even more.
Poleg nizkih cen so nekateri vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki prejeli tudi druga sredstva v zvezi z nakupom pravic do uporabe zemljišč, ki so še bolj zmanjšala dejansko ceno teh pravic.
The findings of the proceeding confirm that the situation concerning land provision and acquisition in the PRC is unclear and non-transparent and the prices are often arbitrarily set by the authorities.
Ugotovitve tega postopka potrjujejo, da je položaj v zvezi z zagotavljanjem in pridobivanjem zemljišč v LRK nejasen in nepregleden ter da organi cene pogosto določajo samovoljno.
The authorities set the prices according to the Urban Land Evaluation System which instructs them among other criteria to consider also industrial policy when setting the price of industrial land [83].
Organi cene določajo v skladu s sistemom vrednotenja mestnih zemljišč, ki jim med drugim nalaga tudi merilo upoštevanja industrijske politike ob določanju cene industrijskega zemljišča [83].
Also, the independent publicly available information suggest that the land in the PRC is provided for below the normal market rates [84]
Poleg tega neodvisne javno dostopne informacije kažejo, da se zemljišča v LRK zagotavljajo po cenah pod običajno tržno stopnjo [84].
As explained in recitals (364) to (367) above, there is no functioning market for land in the PRC and the use of an external benchmark (see recital (372) below) demonstrates that the amount paid for land-use rights by the sampled exporters is well below the normal market rate.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah od (364) do (367), v LRK ni delujočega trga za zemljišča in uporaba zunanje referenčne vrednosti (glej uvodno izjavo (372)) kaže, da je znesek, ki so ga vzorčeni izvozniki plačali za pravice do uporabe zemljišč, precej nižji od običajnega tržnega tečaja.
In addition, the refunds from local authorities are direct transfers of funds which confer a benefit because they are non-repayable grants not available on the market.
Poleg tega so nadomestila, prejeta od lokalnih organov, neposredni prenosi sredstev, ki prinašajo ugodnosti, ker pomenijo nepovratna sredstva, ki na trgu niso na voljo.
The subsidy is specific under Article 4 2(a) and 4 2(c) of the basic Regulation because the preferential access to industrial land is limited only to companies belonging to certain industries, in this case the photovoltaic industry, only certain transactions were subject to a bidding process, prices are often being set by the authorities and government practices in this area are unclear and non-transparent.
Subvencija je specifična v smislu člena 4(2)(a) in (c) osnovne uredbe, ker je preferenčni dostop do industrijskih zemljiščih omejen na zgolj družbe, ki delujejo v določenih industrijah, v tem primeru fotonapetostni industriji, in ker so bili predmet razpisnega postopka le določeni posli, ker organi pogosto določajo cene ter ker so vladne prakse na tem področju nejasne in nepregledne.
The situation concerning land in the PRC is also discussed in the IMF Working Paper which confirms that the provision of LUR to Chinese industries does not respect market conditions [85].
Stanje glede zemljišč v LRK je obravnavano tudi v Delovnem dokumentu Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, ki potrjuje, da zagotavljanje pravic do uporabe zemljišč kitajskim industrijam ne upošteva tržnih pogojev [85].
As it was concluded that the situation in the PRC with respect to land-use rights is not market-driven, there appear to be no available private benchmarks at all in the PRC.
Ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da položaj v LRK v zvezi s pravicami do uporabe zemljišč ni tržno usmerjen, se zdi, da v LRK ni na voljo prav nobenih referenčnih vrednosti v zasebnem sektorju.
Therefore, an adjustment of costs or prices in the PRC is not practicable.
Zato prilagoditev stroškov ali cen v LRK ni izvedljiva.
In these circumstances it is considered that there is no market in the PRC and, in accordance with Article 6(d)(ii) of the basic Regulation, the use of an external benchmark for measuring the amount of benefit is warranted.
V teh okoliščinah se šteje, da v LRK ni trga, in je v skladu s členom 6(d)(ii) osnovne uredbe odobrena uporaba zunanje referenčne vrednosti za ocenjevanje zneska ugodnosti.
This information was also used in previous investigations concerning Coated Fine Paper and Organic Coated Steel.
Te informacije so bile uporabljene tudi v prejšnjih preiskavah v zvezi s premazanim finim papirjem in jeklom, prevlečenim z organskimi premazi.
The Commission considers that the land prices in Taiwan offer the best proxy to the areas in the PRC where the cooperating exporting producers are based.
Komisija meni, da so cene zemljišč na Tajvanu najboljši približek za območja v LRK, kjer imajo sedež sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki.
The majority of the exporting producers are located in the developed high-GDP areas in provinces with a high population density.
Večina proizvajalcev izvoznikov ima sedež na razvitih območjih z visokim BDP v gosto poseljenih provincah.
The benefit conferred on the recipients is calculated by taking into consideration the difference between the amount actually paid by each company (reduced by the amount of local government refunds) for land use rights and the amount that should have been normally paid on the basis of the Taiwanese benchmark.
Ugodnost za prejemnike se izračuna z upoštevanjem razlike med zneskom, ki ga je vsako podjetje dejansko plačalo za pravice do uporabe zemljišč (zmanjšanim za znesek nadomestil, prejetih od lokalne vlade), in zneskom, ki bi moral biti običajno plačan na podlagi tajvanske referenčne vrednosti.
In accordance with Article 7(3) of the basic Regulation this subsidy amount (numerator) has been allocated to the IP using the normal life time of the land use right for industrial use land, i.e. 50 years.
V skladu s členom 7(3) osnovne uredbe je bil ta znesek subvencije (števec) dodeljen za OP z uporabo običajne življenjske dobe pravice do uporabe zemljišč za uporabo industrijskih zemljišč, tj. 50 let.
Land Use Rights at LTAR
Pravice do uporabe zemljišča za manj kot ustrezno nadomestilo
Comments of parties after definitive disclosure
Pripombe strani po dokončnem razkritju
The GOC objected the fact that certain information from the definitive disclosure document was cited by some media and interested parties following the disclosure.
Kitajska vlada je ugovarjala dejstvu, da so nekateri mediji in zainteresirane strani po razkritju navajali določene informacije iz dokumenta o dokončnem razkritju.
In this respect it is noted that the Commission did not make the document public.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da Komisija ni javno objavila dokumenta.
But it is not possible for the Commission to control the actions of several hundred interested parties which received the disclosure document.
Vendar Komisija ne more nadzorovati dejanj več sto zainteresiranih strani, ki so prejele dokument o razkritju.
If some of the parties decided to make the disclosure document public or to express their opinion on the document the Commission had no means to prevent them to do so.
Če so se nekatere strani odločile, da javno objavijo dokument o razkritju ali izrazijo svoje mnenje o dokumentu, Komisija ni imela sredstev, da bi jim to preprečila.
Comments of the GOC concerning allegedly erroneous statements in the definitive disclosure document
Pripombe kitajske vlade v zvezi z domnevno napačnimi izjavami v dokumentu o dokončnem razkritju
The GOC claimed that the Commission has violated the ‘ample opportunity’ requirement of Article 12.1 of the SCM Agreement.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da je Komisija kršila zahtevo glede „zadostne možnosti“ iz člena 12.1 Sporazuma SIU.
According to the GOC the extensive deadline extensions granted by the Commission for the reply to the questionnaire (as detailed in recital (104) above) were not sufficient for this purpose.
Po mnenju kitajske vlade izjemno dolgo podaljšanje roka za predložitev izpolnjenih vprašalnikov, ki ga je odobrila Komisija (kot je podrobneje navedeno v uvodni izjavi (104)), v ta namen ni bilo zadostno.