natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the audit of individual innovative actions to ensure that they implement the grant according to the principles of sound financial management;
revizijo posameznih inovativnih ukrepov, da se zagotovi izvrševanje nepovratnih sredstev v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja;
a financial contribution in support of the management tasks of the entrusted entity to be provided in the form of a flat-rate contribution to the operational costs of the entrusted entity and established on the basis of the amount of Union funds for grant support entrusted to that entity.
finančni prispevek za naloge upravljanja, ki jih opravlja pooblaščeni subjekt; finančni prispevek se zagotovi v obliki pavšalnega prispevka za stroške poslovanja pooblaščenega subjekta in se določi na podlagi zneska sredstev Unije, ki se kot nepovratna sredstva dodelijo navedenemu subjektu.
The entrusted entity shall provide the Commission with the documents in accordance with Article 60(5) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 and with all necessary information required for the evaluation of the implementation of the innovative actions.
Pooblaščeni subjekt Komisiji predloži dokumente v skladu s členom 60(5) Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 in vse informacije, potrebne za oceno izvajanja inovativnih ukrepov.
Selection of innovative actions
Izbor inovativnih ukrepov
The entrusted entity shall select innovative actions on the basis of calls for proposals, taking account of themes defined by the Commission services on an annual basis.
Pooblaščeni subjekt izbere inovativne ukrepe na podlagi razpisa za zbiranje predlogov, ob upoštevanju tem, ki jih vsako leto opredelijo službe Komisije.
The following authorities may apply for support to undertake innovative actions:
Vlogo za podporo za izvajanje inovativnih ukrepov lahko vložijo naslednji organi:
any urban authority of a local administrative unit defined according to the degree of urbanisation as city, town or suburb and comprising at least 50000 inhabitants;
kateri koli mestni organ v okviru lokalne upravne enote, ki je glede na stopnjo urbanizacije opredeljena kot mesto, kraj ali predmestje in šteje najmanj 50000 prebivalcev;
any association or grouping of urban authorities of local administrative units defined according to the degree of urbanisation as city, town or suburb where the total population is at least 50000 inhabitants; this can include cross-border associations or groupings, associations or groupings in different regions and/or Member States.
katero koli združenje ali skupina organov urbanega značaja v okviru lokalnih upravnih enot, ki so glede na stopnjo urbanizacije opredeljene kot mesto, kraj ali predmestje ter skupaj štejejo najmanj 50000 prebivalcev; to lahko vključuje čezmejna združenja ali skupine ter združenja ali skupine v različnih regijah in/ali državah članicah.
The expert panel referred to in Article 1(2)(e) shall make recommendations concerning the innovative actions to be selected.
Komisija strokovnjakov iz člena 1(2)(e) izda priporočila v zvezi z izborom inovativnih ukrepov.
The expert panel shall be geographically balanced and chaired by the Commission.
Komisija strokovnjakov je geografsko uravnotežena, predseduje pa ji Komisija.
In making its recommendations, the expert panel shall take into account, in particular, the following criteria:
Pri svojih priporočilih upošteva zlasti naslednja merila:
the innovative content of the proposal and its potential to identify or test new solutions;
inovativnost predloga in njegov potencial za opredelitev ali preskušanje novih rešitev;
the quality of the proposal;
kakovost predloga;
the involvement of relevant partners in the preparation of the proposal;
sodelovanje ustreznih partnerjev pri pripravi predloga;
the capacity to demonstrate measurable results;
sposobnost dokazovanja merljivih rezultatov;
the transferability of the solutions proposed.
prenosljivost predlaganih rešitev.
The expert panel shall ensure that the territorial diversity of the Union's urban areas is taken into account in its recommendations.
Komisija strokovnjakov v svojih priporočilih upošteva ozemeljsko raznolikost urbanih območij Unije.
The entrusted entity shall select the innovative actions on the basis of the recommendation of the expert panel and in agreement with the Commission.
Pooblaščeni subjekt izbere inovativne ukrepe na podlagi priporočila komisije strokovnjakov in po dogovoru s Komisijo.
The amount granted to each innovative action shall not exceed EUR 5000000.
Znesek, dodeljen posameznemu inovativnemu ukrepu, ne presega 5000000 EUR.
Each innovative action shall be implemented within a maximum period of three years.
Izvajanje posameznega inovativnega ukrepa se zaključi v največ treh letih.
Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Regional Development Fund and on specific provisions concerning the Investment for growth and jobs goal and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 289).
Uredba (EU) št. 1301/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj in o posebnih določbah glede cilja „naložbe za rast in delovna mesta“ ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 ( UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str. 289).
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on the rules of application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (OJ L 362, 31.12.2012, p. 1).
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1268/2012 z dne 29. oktobra 2012 o pravilih uporabe Uredbe (EU, Euratom) št. 966/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za splošni proračun Unije (UL L 362, 31.12.2012, str. 1).
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 523/2014
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 523/2014
supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for determining what constitutes the close correspondence between the value of an institution's covered bonds and the value of the institution's assets
o dopolnitvi Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z regulativnimi tehničnimi standardi za opredelitev, kaj predstavlja tesno vez med vrednostjo kritih obveznic institucije in vrednostjo njenih sredstev
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 [1], and in particular Article 33(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o bonitetnih zahtevah za kreditne institucije in investicijska podjetja ter o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2012 [1] in zlasti člena 33(4) Uredbe,
Gains or losses on liabilities of an institution resulting from changes in its own credit risk should not, in principle, be included as an element of own funds.
Dobički in izgube na strani obveznosti institucije, ki so posledica sprememb njenega kreditnega tveganja, načeloma ne bi smeli biti sestavine kapitala.
However, in business models based on the strict match funding or balance principle that rule is not applied, on the premise that a decline or an increase in value of a liability is fully offset by a corresponding decline or increase in value of the asset, with which that liability is fully matched.
Vendar se v poslovnih modelih, ki temeljijo na strogem načelu usklajevanja ali ravnovesja, to pravilo ne uporablja ob predpostavki, da se zmanjšanje ali povečanje vrednosti obveznosti popolnoma izravna z ustreznim zmanjšanjem ali povečanjem vrednosti sredstev, ki popolnoma ustrezajo obveznosti.
It is important to set the requirements for determining whether a close correspondence exists between the liabilities of an institution consisting in a covered bond as referred to in Article 52(4) of Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] and the value of the institution's assets underlying the covered bonds.
Treba je določiti zahteve za opredelitev, ali obstaja tesna vez med obveznostmi institucije v obliki kritih obveznic v smislu člena 52(4) Direktive 2009/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2] ter vrednostjo sredstev institucije, ki so osnova za krite obveznice.
Close correspondence should be reflected in the accounting treatment of those bonds and the underlying mortgage loans, without which it would not be prudent to recognise gains and losses stemming from changes in own credit risk.
Tesna vez bi se morala odražati v računovodski obravnavi takih obveznic in hipotekarnih posojil, ki so njihova osnova, saj sicer ne bi bilo preudarno vključiti dobičkov in izgub, nastalih na podlagi sprememb kreditnega tveganja institucije.
A delivery option allows the borrower to buy back the specific covered bond financing the mortgage loan in the market and deliver the covered bond to the bank as an early prepayment of the mortgage loan.
Možnost dostave posojilojemalcu omogoča, da odkupi določeno krito obveznico, s katero se financira hipotekarno posojilo na trgu, ter krito obveznico dostavi banki kot predčasno poplačilo hipotekarnega posojila.
As a consequence of the availability of that option to the borrower, the fair value of the mortgage loans should at all times be equal to the fair value of the covered bonds financing those mortgages.
Ker je posojilojemalcu na voljo ta možnost, bi morala poštena vrednost hipotekarnih posojil vedno ustrezati pošteni vrednosti kritih obveznic, s katerimi se hipotekarna posojila financirajo.
This implies that the calculation of the fair value of the mortgage loans should include the fair valuation of the embedded delivery option according to established market practices.
To pomeni, da bi bilo treba pri izračunu poštene vrednosti hipotekarnih posojil upoštevati pošteno vrednost možnosti dostave v skladu z ustaljeno tržno prakso.
This Regulation is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted by the European Banking Authority to the Commission.
Ta uredba temelji na osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, ki jih je Komisiji predložil Evropski bančni organ.
The European Banking Authority has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the opinion of the Banking Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3],
Evropski bančni organ je opravil javna posvetovanja o osnutkih regulativnih tehničnih standardov, na katerih temelji ta uredba, analiziral morebitne povezane stroške in koristi ter prosil za mnenje interesno skupino za bančništvo, ustanovljeno v skladu s členom 37 Uredbe (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] –
‘covered bond’ means a bond as referred to in Article 52(4) of Directive 2009/65/EC;
„Krita obveznica“ pomeni obveznico iz člena 52(4) Direktive 2009/65/ES.
‘delivery option’ means the possibility to redeem the mortgage loan by buying back the covered bond at market or at nominal value in accordance with Article 33(3)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
„Možnost dostave“ pomeni možnost poplačila hipotekarnega posojila z odkupom kritih obveznic po tržni ali nominalni vrednosti v skladu s členom 33(3)(d) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013.
Close correspondence
Tesna vez
A close correspondence between the value of a covered bond and the value of an institution's assets shall be deemed to exist when all the following conditions are met:
Šteje se, da med vrednostjo krite obveznice in vrednostjo sredstev institucije obstaja tesna vez, če so izpolnjeni vsi naslednji pogoji:
any changes in the fair value of the covered bonds issued by the institution results at all times in equal changes in the fair value of the assets underlying the covered bonds.
kakršne koli spremembe poštene vrednosti kritih obveznic, ki jih izda institucija, bodo vedno imele za posledico enake spremembe poštene vrednosti sredstev, ki so osnova za krite obveznice.
The fair value shall be determined according to the applicable accounting framework as defined in Article 4(1)(77) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
Poštena vrednost se določi v skladu z veljavnim računovodskim okvirom, kot je določen v členu 4(1)(77) Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013;
the mortgage loans underlying the covered bonds issued by the institution to finance the loans may be at any time redeemed by buying back the covered bonds at market or nominal value through the exercise of the delivery option;
hipotekarna posojila, ki so osnova za krite obveznice, ki jih izda institucija za financiranje posojil, se lahko kadar koli poplačajo z odkupom kritih obveznic po tržni ali nominalni vrednosti z uporabo možnosti dostave;
there is a transparent mechanism for determining the fair value of the mortgage loans and of the covered bonds.
obstaja pregleden mehanizem za določanje poštene vrednosti hipotekarnih posojil in kritih obveznic.
Determining the value of the mortgage loans shall include calculating the fair value of the delivery option.
Določitev vrednosti hipotekarnih posojil vključuje izračun poštene vrednosti možnosti dostave.
A close correspondence shall not be deemed to exist where, in accordance with paragraph 1, a net profit or loss arises from changes in the value of the covered bonds or of the underlying mortgage loans with the embedded delivery option.
Šteje se, da tesna vez ne obstaja, če sta v skladu z odstavkom 1 čisti dobiček ali izguba posledica sprememb vrednosti bodisi kritih obveznic bodisi hipotekarnih posojil z možnostjo dostave, ki so njihova osnova.
Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS), (OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p. 32).
Direktiva 2009/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih za vlaganja v prenosljive vrednostne papirje (KNPVP) (UL L 302, 17.11.2009, str. 32).
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 524/2014
Delegirana uredba Komisije (EU) št. 524/2014
supplementing Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the information that competent authorities of home and host Member States supply to one another
o dopolnitvi Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede regulativnih tehničnih standardov, v katerih so določene informacije, ki jih drug drugemu posredujejo pristojni organi matičnih držav članic in držav članic gostiteljic
Having regard to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC [1], and in particular Article 50(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2013/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2013 o dostopu do dejavnosti kreditnih institucij in bonitetnem nadzoru kreditnih institucij in investicijskih podjetij, spremembi Direktive 2002/87/ES in razveljavitvi direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES [1] ter zlasti člena 50(6) Direktive,
In order to ensure efficient cooperation between competent authorities of home and host Member States information exchange should be two-way, within the respective supervisory competences of those authorities.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega sodelovanja med pristojnimi organi matičnih držav članic in držav članic gostiteljic bi morala biti izmenjava informacij dvosmerna, in sicer v okviru ustreznih nadzornih pristojnosti navedenih organov.
It is therefore necessary to specify which information concerning institutions, and where relevant, concerning the functioning of their branches, should be provided by the competent authorities of the home Member State to the competent authorities of the host Member State, as well as which information regarding branches needs to be provided by competent authorities of host Member States to the competent authorities of the home Member State.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti, katere informacije v zvezi z institucijami in, kadar je ustrezno, v zvezi z delovanjem njihovih podružnic bi morali posredovati pristojni organi matične države članice pristojnim organom države članice gostiteljice ter katere informacije glede podružnic morajo posredovati pristojni organi držav članic gostiteljic pristojnim organom matične države članice.
Exchange of information between competent authorities of home and host Member States should be seen in a wider context of supervision of cross-border banking groups and, were relevant, information could be provided at the consolidated level.
Izmenjava informacij med pristojnimi organi matičnih držav članic in držav članic gostiteljic bi se morala obravnavati v širšem okviru nadzora čezmejnih bančnih skupin in, kadar je ustrezno, bi se informacije lahko zagotovile na konsolidirani podlagi.
In particular, if an institution has an ultimate parent undertaking in the Member State where it has its head office, and the competent authority concerned is also the consolidating supervisor, possibilities should be made available to provide information at the consolidated level rather than at the level of an institution operating through a branch.
Zlasti če ima institucija končno matično podjetje v državi članici, v kateri ima svoj sedež, in je zadevni pristojni organ tudi konsolidacijski nadzornik, bi bilo treba omogočiti, da se zagotovijo informacije na konsolidirani podlagi in ne na ravni institucije, ki posluje prek podružnice.
However, in this case the competent authority should notify competent authorities of host Member States that the information is provided at the consolidated level.
Vendar bi moral v tem primeru pristojni organ uradno obvestiti pristojne organe države članice gostiteljice, da se informacije zagotavljajo na konsolidirani podlagi.
Information exchange between competent authorities of home and host Member States is not limited to the types of information specified in Article 50 of Directive 2013/36/EU, and therefore to the types of information specified in this Regulation.
Izmenjava informacij med pristojnimi organi matičnih držav članic in držav članic gostiteljic ni omejena na vrste informacij, opredeljene v členu 50 Direktive 2013/36/EU, in tako na vrste informacij, določene v tej uredbi.
In particular, Articles 35, 36, 39, 43 and 52 of Directive 2013/36/EU set out a separate provision for exchange of information regarding on-the-spot verification of branches, notifications of the exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services, and measures, including precautionary ones, taken by competent authorities in relation to branches and their parent undertakings.
Zlasti členi 35, 36, 39, 43 in 52 Direktive 2013/36/EU navajajo ločene določbe za izmenjavo informacij o preverjanju podružnic na kraju samem, uradnih obvestilih o izvajanju pravice do ustanavljanja in svobode opravljanja storitev ter o ukrepih, vključno s previdnostnimi ukrepi, ki jih sprejmejo pristojni organi v zvezi s podružnicami in njihovimi matičnimi podjetji.
This Regulation should therefore not specify exchange of information requirements in those areas.
Ta uredba zato ne bi smela določati zahtev glede izmenjave informacij na navedenih področjih.
It is necessary to laid down requirements for the information to be exchanged between competent authorities of home and host Member States in order to harmonise regulatory and supervisory practices across the Union.
Določiti je treba zahteve za informacije, ki se izmenjajo med pristojnimi organi matičnih držav članic in držav članic gostiteljic, da bi se uskladile regulativne in nadzorne prakse po vsej Uniji.
This information should cover all the areas specified in Article 50 of Directive 2013/36/EU, namely management and ownership, including business lines such as those referred to in Article 317 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2], liquidity and findings pertaining to liquidity supervision, solvency, deposit guarantee, large exposures, systemic risk, administrative and accounting procedures, and internal control mechanisms.
Te informacije bi morale zajemati vsa področja, določena v členu 50 Direktive 2013/36/EU, in sicer upravljanje in lastništvo, vključno s poslovnimi področji, kot so tista iz člena 317 Uredbe (EU) št. 575/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2], likvidnost in ugotovitve iz nadzora likvidnosti, kapitalska ustreznost, zajamčene vloge, velike izpostavljenosti, sistemsko tveganje, upravni in računovodski postopki ter mehanizmi notranjih kontrol.
In order to facilitate the monitoring of institutions, the competent authorities of host and home Member States should keep each other informed about situations of non-compliance with national or Union law as well as about supervisory measures and sanctions imposed on institutions.
Da bi se olajšalo spremljanje institucij, bi se morali pristojni organi držav članic gostiteljic in matičnih držav članic med seboj obveščati o primerih neskladnosti z nacionalnim pravom ali pravom Unije ter o nadzornih ukrepih in sankcijah, naloženih institucijam.
Furthermore, additional information regarding leverage and preparation for emergency situations should be included into the scope of information to be exchanged between competent authorities of home and host Member States so that the latter are able to monitor institutions in an efficient way.
Poleg tega bi se morale dodatne informacije o finančnem vzvodu in pripravah na izredne razmere vključiti v obseg informacij, ki se izmenjajo med pristojnimi organi matičnih držav članic in držav članic gostiteljic, tako da bi lahko slednji institucije učinkovito spremljali.
Where a liquidity stress affects or is expected to affect an institution, the competent authorities of host Member States need to have a clear understanding of the situation in order to be able to take precautionary measures under the conditions set out in Article 43 of Directive 2013/36/EU.
Če likvidnostne težave vplivajo na institucijo ali se pričakuje, da bodo vplivale nanjo, morajo biti pristojni organi držav članic gostiteljic dobro seznanjeni s položajem, da bi lahko sprejeli previdnostne ukrepe v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v členu 43 Direktive 2013/36/EU.
This Regulation should therefore provide clear rules on what types of information have to be exchanged between authorities when a liquidity stress occurs.
Ta uredba bi morala zato zagotoviti jasna pravila o vrstah informacij, ki se izmenjajo med organi, če se pojavijo likvidnostne težave.
It is also necessary to specify the information to be exchanged so that authorities should be prepared well in advance for emergency situations such as those referred to in Article 114(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU.
Prav tako je treba opredeliti informacije, ki jih je treba izmenjati, tako da bi bili organi dovolj zgodaj pripravljeni na izredne razmere, kot so tiste iz člena 114(1) Direktive 2013/36/EU.
Given the differences in the size, complexity and significance of branches operating in host Member States, it is important to apply the principle of proportionality in the exchange of information.
Zaradi razlik v velikosti, zapletenosti in pomenu podružnic, ki poslujejo v državah članicah gostiteljicah, je treba pri izmenjavi informacij uporabiti načelo sorazmernosti.
To this end, a more extensive range of information should be exchanged between home and host competent authorities where the competent authorities in host Member States are responsible for branches identified as significant in accordance with Article 51 of Directive 2013/36/EU.
Tako bi se moral med pristojnimi organi matične države članice in države članice gostiteljice izmenjati obsežnejši sklop informacij, če so pristojni organi v državah članicah gostiteljicah odgovorni za podružnice, opredeljene kot pomembne v skladu s členom 51 Direktive 2013/36/EU.