natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The national regulatory authority may set targets for the proportion by which the long term contracts should be reduced in order to increase the liquidity of the short term wholesale gas market.
Nacionalni regulativni organ lahko določi ciljni delež zmanjšanja dolgoročnih pogodb, da se poveča likvidnost kratkoročnega veleprodajnega trga s plinom.
The national regulatory authority shall take and publish a motivated decision in accordance with paragraph 1 within three months following the receipt of such a request.
Nacionalni organ v skladu z odstavkom 1 sprejme in objavi utemeljeno odločitev v treh mesecih od prejema take zahteve.
Without prejudice to Articles 28, 33(5), 38(1), 45(4), 46(3), 51 and 52 this Regulation shall apply as from 1 October 2015.
Brez poseganja v člene 28, 33(5), 38(1), 45(4), 46(3), 51 in 52 se ta uredba uporablja od 1. oktobra 2015.
Done at Brussels, 26 March 2014.
V Bruslju, 26. marca 2014
Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (OJ L 211, 14.8.2009, p. 1).
Uredba (ES) št. 713/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o ustanovitvi Agencije za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev (UL L 211, 14.8.2009, str. 1).
OJ L 273, 15.10.2013, p. 5. [7] OJ L 273, 15.10.2013, p. 5.
UL L 273, 15.10.2013, str. 5.
The national regulatory authority may allow the transmission system operator, based on its justified request, to comply with the provisions of this Regulation within a twenty four-month period as from 1 October 2014, provided no interim measure referred to in Chapter X is implemented by the transmission system operator.
Nacionalni regulativni organ lahko na podlagi utemeljene zahteve operaterja prenosnega sistema odobri izpolnitev določb te uredbe v štiriindvajsetmesečnem obdobju od 1. oktobra 2014, pod pogojem, da operater prenosnega sistema ne izvede nobenega začasnega ukrepa iz poglavja X.
In case the national regulatory authority makes use of this possibility, this Regulation shall not apply in the balancing zone of that transmission system operator to the extent and for the duration of the transitional period laid down in the decision of the national regulatory authority.
Če nacionalni regulativni organ uporabi to možnost, se ta uredba v predhodnem obdobju iz sklepa nacionalnega regulativnega organa v območju izravnave navedenega operaterja prenosnega sistema ne uporablja.
The transmission system operator may propose to the national regulatory authority a within day obligation or an amendment thereof. It may combine features of the different types described in Article 25 provided the proposal meets the criteria set out in paragraph 2.
Operater prenosnega sistema lahko nacionalnemu regulativnemu organu predlaga obveznost znotraj dneva ali njeno spremembo, ki združuje lastnosti različnih vrst, opisanih v členu 25, pod pogojem, da predlog izpolnjuje pogoje iz odstavka 2.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 313/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 313/2014
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Pecorino Sardo (PDO)]
o odobritvi večje spremembe specifikacije za ime, vpisano v registru zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb [Pecorino Sardo (ZOP)]
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Italy’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Pecorino Sardo’ registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1263/96 [2], as amended by Regulation (EC) No 215/2011 [3].
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 53(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 je Komisija proučila vlogo Italije za odobritev spremembe specifikacije za zaščiteno označbo porekla „Pecorino Sardo“, registrirano v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1263/96 [2] kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 215/2011 [3].
OJ L 59, 4.3.2011, p. 15.
UL L 59, 4.3.2011, str. 15.
OJ C 318, 1.11.2013, p. 8.
UL C 318, 1.11.2013, str. 8.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 314/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 314/2014
Council Regulation (EU) No 315/2014
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 315/2014
amending Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 as regards certain catch limits
o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 43/2014 glede določenih omejitev ulova
Catch limits for sandeel in Union waters of ICES zones IIa, IIIa and IV were set at zero in Annex IA to Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 [1], pending advice from the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES).
Do predložitve mnenja Mednarodnega sveta za raziskovanje morja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ICES) so bile omejitve ulova za pravo peščenko v vodah Unije območij ICES IIa, IIIa in IV v Prilogi IA Uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 43/2014 [1] določene na vrednost nič.
ICES advice on the stock has been available since 21 February 2014, and it is now possible to set a TAC for sandeel in this area, distributed in seven management areas in order to avoid local depletion.
Mnenje ICES o staležu je na voljo od 21. februarja 2014 in zdaj je mogoče določiti TAC za pravo peščenko na tem območju, ki je razdeljeno na sedem območij upravljanja, da bi se izognili lokalnemu izčrpanju.
Fishing opportunities for Union vessels in Norwegian and Faroese waters and for Norwegian and Faroese vessels in Union waters, and the conditions of access to fishery resources in each other’s waters, are established each year in the light of consultations on fishing rights held in accordance with the bilateral agreements on fisheries with Norway [2] and the Faroe Islands [3], respectively.
Ribolovne možnosti za plovila Unije v norveških vodah in vodah Ferskih otokov ter za norveška plovila in plovila Ferskih otokov v vodah Unije, kakor tudi pogoji za medsebojni dostop do ribolovnih možnosti v vodah druge stranke, se določijo vsako leto v luči posvetovanj o ribolovnih pravicah, opravljenih v skladu z dvostranskimi sporazumi na področju ribištva z Norveško [2] oziroma s Ferskimi otoki [3].
Pending the conclusion of those consultations on the arrangements for 2014, Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 fixed provisional fishing opportunities for certain stocks of blue whiting.
Do zaključka teh posvetovanj o dogovorih za leto 2014 Uredba (EU) št. 43/2014 določa začasne ribolovne možnosti za zadevne staleže sinjega mola.
On 12 March 2014, the consultations with Norway and the Faroe Islands were concluded, including those related to blue whiting.
Posvetovanja z Norveško in Ferskimi otoki so bila zaključena 12. marca 2014, tudi tista v zvezi s sinjim molom.
Annex IA to Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo IA k Uredbi (EU) št. 43/2014 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Such retroactive application is without prejudice to the principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations as the fishing opportunities concerned were set to zero in the Regulation (EU) No 43/2014.
Takšna retroaktivna uporaba ne posega v načeli pravne varnosti in legitimnega pričakovanja, saj so bile zadevne ribolovne možnosti v Uredbi (EU) št. 43/2014 določene na vrednost nič.
Since the modification of this catch limit has an influence on the economic activities and the planning of the fishing season of Union vessels, this Regulation should enter into force immediately after its publication,
Ker sprememba te omejite ulova vpliva na gospodarske dejavnosti in načrtovanje ribolovne sezone plovil Unije, bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati takoj po objavi.
Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 43/2014
Sprememba Uredbe (EU) št. 43/2014
Annex IA to Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 is amended in accordance with the text set out in Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga IA k Uredbi (EU) št. 43/2014 se spremeni v skladu z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
Council Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 of 20 January 2014 fixing for 2014 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, to Union vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 24, 28.1.2014, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 43/2014 z dne 20. januarja 2014 o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti za leto 2014 za nekatere staleže rib in skupine staležev rib, ki veljajo za vode Unije in za plovila Unije v nekaterih vodah zunaj Unije (UL L 24, 28.1.2014, str. 1).
Agreement on fisheries between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway (OJ L 226, 29.8.1980, p. 48).
Sporazum o ribištvu med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Norveško (UL L 226, 29.8.1980, str. 48).
Agreement on fisheries between the European Economic Community, of the one part, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Government of the Faroe Islands, of the other part (OJ L 226, 29.8.1980, p. 12).
Sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo na eni strani in vlado Danske ter lokalno vlado Ferskih otokov na drugi strani (UL L 226, 29.8.1980, str. 12).
Annex IA to Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 is amended as follows:
Priloga IA k Uredbi (EU) št. 43/2014 se spremeni:
the entry for Sandeel in Union waters of ICES zones IIa, IIIa and IV is replaced by the following:
vnos za pravo peščenko v vodah Unije območij ICES IIa, IIIa in IV se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Union waters of IIa, IIIa and IV [1]
vode Unije območij IIa, IIIa in IV [1]
within the limits of the abovementioned quotas, no more than the quantities given below may be taken in the following sandeel management areas, as defined in Annex IID:
v mejah zgoraj navedenih kvot se lahko v naslednjih območjih upravljanja prave peščenke, kot so določena v Prilogi IID, ulovijo samo naslednje količine:
Union waters of sandeel management areas
vode Unije območij upravljanja prave peščenke
the entry for blue whiting in Norwegian waters of II and IV is replaced by the following:
vnos za sinjega mola v norveških vodah območji II in IV se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Norwegian waters of II and IV
norveške vode območij II in IV
the entry for blue whiting in Union and international waters of I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId, VIIIe, XII and XIV is replaced by the following:
vnos za sinjega mola v vodah Unije in mednarodnih vodah območij I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId, VIIIe, XII in XIV se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Union and international waters of I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId, VIIIe, XII and XIV
vode Unije in mednarodne vode območij I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId, VIIIe, XII in XIV
the entry for blue whiting in VIIIc, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1 is replaced by the following:
vnos za sinjega mola v območjih VIIIc, IX in X; vode Unije območja CECAF 34.1.1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
VIIIc, IX and X; Union waters of CECAF 34.1.1
VIIIc, IX in X; vode Unije območja CECAF 34.1.1
the entry for blue whiting in Union waters of II, IVa, V, VI north of 56° 30′ N and VII west of 12° W is replaced by the following:
vnos za sinjega mola v vodah Unije območij II, IVa, V, VI severno od 56° 30′ S in območje VII zahodno od 12° Z se nadomesti z naslednjim
Union waters of II, IVa, V, VI north of 56° 30′ N and VII west of 12° W
vode Unije območij II, IVa, V, VI severno od 56° 30′ S in območje VII zahodno od 12° Z
Excluding waters within six nautical miles of the UK baselines at Shetland, Fair Isle and Foula.
Brez voda znotraj šestih morskih milj od temeljnih črt Združenega kraljestva pri Šetlandskih otokih, otokih Fair in Foula.
Special condition: of which up to the following percentage may be fished in Norwegian Economic Zone or in the fishery zone around Jan Mayen (WHB/*NZJM1): 0 %
Posebni pogoj: od tega je naslednji odstotek dovoljeno uloviti v norveški ekonomski coni ali v ribolovnem območju okrog otoka Jan Mayen (WHB/*NZJM1): 0 %
Special condition: of which up to the following quantity may be fished in Faroese waters (WHB/*05-F.): 25000’;
Posebni pogoj: od tega je naslednjo količino dovoljeno uloviti v vodah Ferskih otokov (WHB/*05-F.): 25000“
Special condition: of which up to the following percentage may be fished in Norwegian EEZ or in the fishery zone around Jan Mayen (WHB/*NZJM2): 0 %’;
Posebni pogoj: od tega je naslednji odstotek dovoljeno uloviti v izključni ekonomski coni norveške ali v ribolovnem območju okrog otoka Jan Mayen (WHB/*NZJM2): 0 %“
To be counted against Norway’s catch limits established under the Coastal States arrangement.
Se všteje v norveško kvoto omejitve ulova, določeno v sporazumu obalnih držav
Special condition: the catch in IV shall be no more than the following amount (WHB/*04A-C): 0This catch limit in IV amounts to the following percentage of Norway’s access quota: 0 %
Posebni pogoj: ulov v območju IV ne presega naslednje količine (WHB/*04A-C): 0Ta omejitev ulova v območju IV dosega naslednji odstotek dovoljene kvote za dostop za Norveško: 0 %
To be counted against the catch limits of the Faroe Islands.
Se všteje v kvoto omejitve ulova Ferskih otokov.
Special conditions: may also be fished in VIb (WHB/*06B-C).
Posebni pogoji: lovi se lahko tudi v območju VIb (WHB/*06B-C).
The catch in IVa shall be no more than 6250 tonnes (WHB/*04A-C).’
Ulov v območju IVa ne sme presegati 6250 ton (WHB/*04A-C).“
The catch limits provided for in Regulation (EU) No 43/2014 apply from 1 January 2014.
Omejitve ulova iz Uredbe (EU) št. 43/2014 se uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2014.
The provisions of this Regulation concerning catch limits should therefore also apply from that date.
Določbe v zvezi z omejitvami ulova iz te uredbe bi se zato prav tako morale uporabljati od navedenega datuma.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 316/2014
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 316/2014
on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to categories of technology transfer agreements
o uporabi člena 101(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije za skupine sporazumov o prenosu tehnologije
Having regard to Regulation No 19/65/EEC of the Council of 2 March 1965 on application of Article 85(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements and concerted practices [1], and in particular Article 1 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta št. 19/65/EGS z dne 2. marca 1965 o uporabi člena 85(3) Pogodbe za nekatere skupine sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj [1] ter zlasti člena 1 Uredbe,
Regulation No 19/65/EEC empowers the Commission to apply Article 101(3) of the Treaty by regulation to certain categories of technology transfer agreements and corresponding concerted practices to which only two undertakings are party which fall within Article 101(1) of the Treaty.
Uredba št. 19/65/EGS pooblašča Komisijo, da z uredbo določi uporabo člena 101(3) Pogodbe za nekatere skupine sporazumov o prenosu tehnologije in ustrezna usklajena ravnanja, zajeta v členu 101(1) Pogodbe, v katerih sta udeleženi samo dve podjetji.
Pursuant to Regulation No 19/65/EEC, the Commission has, in particular, adopted Commission Regulation (EC) No 772/2004 [2].
V skladu z Uredbo št. 19/65/EGS je Komisija sprejela zlasti Uredbo (ES) št. 772/2004 [2].
Regulation (EC) No 772/2004 defines categories of technology transfer agreements which the Commission regarded as normally satisfying the conditions laid down in Article 101(3) of the Treaty.
Uredba (ES) št. 772/2004 opredeljuje skupine sporazumov o prenosu tehnologije, za katere je Komisija menila, da običajno izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 101(3) Pogodbe.
In view of the overall positive experience with the application of that Regulation, which expires on 30 April 2014, and taking into account further experience acquired since its adoption, it is appropriate to adopt a new block exemption regulation.
Zaradi splošne pozitivne izkušnje z uporabo navedene uredbe, ki preneha veljati 30. aprila 2014, ter ob upoštevanju dodatnih izkušenj, pridobljenih od njenega sprejetja, je smiselno sprejeti novo uredbo o skupinskih izjemah.
Technology transfer agreements concern the licensing of technology rights.
Sporazumi o prenosu tehnologije zadevajo licenciranje tehnoloških pravic.
Such agreements will usually improve economic efficiency and be pro-competitive as they can reduce duplication of research and development, strengthen the incentive for the initial research and development, spur incremental innovation, facilitate diffusion and generate product market competition.
Taki sporazumi običajno izboljšujejo gospodarsko učinkovitost in spodbujajo konkurenco, ker lahko zmanjšajo podvajanje raziskav in razvoja, krepijo spodbude za začetne raziskave in razvoj, spodbujajo večjo inovativnost, omogočajo razširjanje in ustvarjajo konkurenco na proizvodnem trgu.
The likelihood that such efficiency-enhancing and pro-competitive effects will outweigh any anti-competitive effects due to restrictions contained in technology transfer agreements depends on the degree of market power of the undertakings concerned and, therefore, on the extent to which those undertakings face competition from undertakings owning substitute technologies or undertakings producing substitute products.
Verjetnost, da bodo taki učinki, ki povečujejo učinkovitost in konkurenčnost, prevladali nad kakršnimi koli protikonkurenčnimi učinki zaradi omejitev, vsebovanih v sporazumih o prenosu tehnologije, je odvisna od stopnje tržne moči zadevnih podjetij in zato od obsega, v katerem se ta podjetja soočajo s konkurenco podjetij, ki imajo v lasti nadomestne tehnologije, ali podjetij, ki proizvajajo nadomestne izdelke.
This Regulation should cover only technology transfer agreements between a licensor and a licensee.
Ta uredba bi se morala nanašati samo na sporazume o prenosu tehnologije med dajalcem in pridobiteljem licence.
It should cover such agreements even if the agreement contains conditions relating to more than one level of trade, for instance requiring the licensee to set up a particular distribution system and specifying the obligations the licensee must or may impose on resellers of the products produced under the licence.
Take sporazume bi morala urejati tudi, če sporazum vsebuje pogoje glede več kot ene ravni menjave, na primer zahtevo, da pridobitelj licence vzpostavi poseben sistem distribucije, in izpolnitev obveznosti, ki jih pridobitelj licence mora zahtevati oziroma lahko zahteva od prodajnih posrednikov za izdelke, proizvedene na podlagi licence.
However, such conditions and obligations should comply with the competition rules applicable to supply and distribution agreements set out in Commission Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 [3].
Vendar pa bi morali biti taki pogoji in obveznosti skladni s pravili o konkurenci, ki se uporabljajo za sporazume o dobavi in distribuciji, kot so določena v Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 330/2010 [3].
Supply and distribution agreements concluded between a licensee and buyers of its contract products should not be exempted by this Regulation.
Sporazumi o dobavi in distribuciji, sklenjeni med pridobiteljem licence in kupci njegovih pogodbenih izdelkov, ne bi smeli biti izvzeti s to uredbo.
This Regulation should only apply to agreements where the licensor permits the licensee and/or one or more of its sub-contractors to exploit the licensed technology rights, possibly after further research and development by the licensee and/or its sub-contractors, for the purpose of producing goods or services.
Ta uredba bi se morala uporabljati samo za sporazume, s katerimi dajalec licence dovoljuje pridobitelju licence in/ali enemu ali več njegovim podizvajalcem, da izkoriščajo licenčne tehnološke pravice, po možnosti po nadaljnjih raziskavah in razvoju, ki jih opravijo pridobitelj licence in/ali njegovi podizvajalci, za proizvodnjo blaga ali storitev.
It should not apply to licensing in the context of research and development agreements which are covered by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1217/2010 [4] or to licensing in the context of specialisation agreements which are covered by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1218/2010 [5].
Ne bi se smela uporabljati za podeljevanje licenc v okviru sporazumov o raziskavah in razvoju, ki jih zajema Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1217/2010 [4], in za podeljevanje licenc v okviru sporazumov o specializaciji, ki jih zajema Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1218/2010 [5].
It should also not apply to agreements, the purpose of which is the mere reproduction and distribution of software copyright protected products as such agreements do not concern the licensing of a technology to produce but are more akin to distribution agreements.
Nadalje se ne bi smela uporabljati za sporazume, katerih namen je zgolj razmnoževanje in distribucija avtorsko zaščitene programske opreme, saj taki sporazumi ne zadevajo licenciranja tehnologije za proizvodnjo, ampak so sorodnejši sporazumom o distribuciji.
Nor should it apply to agreements to set up technology pools, that is to say, agreements for the pooling of technologies with the purpose of licensing them to third parties, or to agreements whereby the pooled technology is licensed out to those third parties.
Poleg tega se ne bi smela uporabljati za sporazume za ustanovitev tehnoloških združenj, torej sporazumov za združevanje tehnologij z namenom podeljevanja licenc zanje tretjim osebam, ali za sporazume, s katerimi se za združene tehnologije podeljuje licence tretjim osebam.
For the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty by regulation, it is not necessary to define those technology transfer agreements that are capable of falling within Article 101(1) of the Treaty.
Za uporabo člena 101(3) Pogodbe z uredbo ni potrebna opredelitev sporazumov o prenosu tehnologije, ki so lahko zajeti v členu 101(1) Pogodbe.
In the individual assessment of agreements pursuant to Article 101(1), account has to be taken of several factors, and in particular the structure and the dynamics of the relevant technology and product markets.
Pri posamični presoji sporazumov na podlagi člena 101(1) Pogodbe je treba upoštevati več dejavnikov, zlasti strukturo in dinamiko upoštevnih tehnoloških in proizvodnih trgov.
The benefit of the block exemption established by this Regulation should be limited to those agreements which can be assumed with sufficient certainty to satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) of the Treaty.
Ugodnost skupinske izjeme iz te uredbe bi morala biti omejena na tiste sporazume, za katere se lahko dovolj gotovo domneva, da izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 101(3) Pogodbe.
In order to attain the benefits and objectives of technology transfer, this Regulation should not only cover the transfer of technology as such but also other provisions contained in technology transfer agreements if, and to the extent that, those provisions are directly related to the production or sale of the contract products.
Za uresničitev koristi in izpolnitev ciljev prenosa tehnologije ta uredba ne bi smela pokrivati le prenosa tehnologije kot take, temveč tudi druge določbe v sporazumih o prenosu tehnologije, če in kolikor navedene določbe neposredno zadevajo proizvodnjo ali prodajo pogodbenih izdelkov.
For technology transfer agreements between competitors it can be presumed that, where the combined share of the relevant markets accounted for by the parties does not exceed 20 % and the agreements do not contain certain severely anti-competitive restrictions, they generally lead to an improvement in production or distribution and allow consumers a fair share of the resulting benefits.
Za sporazume o prenosu tehnologije med konkurenti je mogoče domnevati, da imajo – kadar skupni delež na upoštevnih trgih pogodbenic ne presega 20 %, sporazumi pa ne vsebujejo nekaterih strogo protikonkurenčnih omejitev – na splošno za posledico izboljšanje proizvodnje ali distribucije in omogočajo potrošnikom pravičen delež doseženih koristi.