natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
amending, for the purposes of adapting to technical progress, Annex III to Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards an exemption for Mercury in hand crafted luminous discharge tubes (HLDTs) used for signs, decorative or architectural and specialist lighting and light-artwork
o spremembi Priloge III k Direktivi 2011/65/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede izjeme pri uporabi živega srebra v ročno izdelanih cevnih plinskih sijalkah (HLDT), ki se uporabljajo za oznake, dekorativno ali arhitekturno in posebno osvetlitev ter svetlobno umetnost, zaradi prilagoditve tehničnemu napredku
Handcrafted luminous discharge tubes (HLDTs) are handmade special purpose lamps which exist in a broad variety.
Ročno izdelane cevne plinske sijalke (HLDT) so svetilke za posebne namene, ki so na voljo v številnih izvedbah.
Examples are neon signs, individual architectural illumination and special light emitters in the chemical analytical research.
Primeri vključujejo neonske oznake, posamično arhitekturno osvetlitev in posebne oddajnike svetlobe za analitične raziskave v kemiji.
As HLDTs are used for indoor and outdoor applications and with an individual colour spectrum composition, they have to work reliably under sensitive and cold conditions with very high life expectations because they are often difficult to access.
Te ročno izdelane cevne plinske sijalke uporabljajo v zaprtih prostorih in na prostem ter z individualno sestavo barvnega spektra, zato morajo zanesljivo delovati v občutljivih in hladnih razmerah ter imeti dolgo pričakovano življenjsko dobo, ker so pogosto težko dostopne.
In order to function properly under these conditions, HLDTs require a minimum quantity of mercury.
Da bi v teh razmerah pravilno delovale, potrebujejo HLDT minimalno količino živega srebra.
The elimination or substitution of mercury in HLDTs and the complete substitution of HLDTs with other technologies such as LED is scientifically and technically impracticable.
Izločitev ali nadomestitev živega srebra v HLDT in popolna nadomestitev HLDT z drugimi tehnologijami, na primer LED, je znanstveno in tehnično neizvedljiva.
The use of mercury in HLDTs used for signs, decorative or architectural and specialist lighting and light-artwork should therefore be exempted from the prohibition.
Uporaba živega srebra v HLDT, ki se uporabljajo za oznake, dekorativno ali arhitekturno in posebno osvetlitev ter svetlobno umetnost, bi torej morala biti izvzeta iz prepovedi.
The use of mercury should be limited to the necessary minimum amount and the validity period should end 31 December 2018, in order to avoid adverse impacts on innovation.
Uporaba živega srebra bi morala biti omejena na potrebno minimalno količino, obdobje veljavnosti pa bi se moralo končati 31. decembra 2018, da bi se preprečili negativni učinki na inovacije.
In Annex III to Directive 2011/65/EU the following point 4(g) is inserted:
V Prilogi III k Direktivi 2011/65/EU se vstavi naslednja točka 4(g):
Mercury in hand crafted luminous discharge tubes used for signs, decorative or architectural and specialist lighting and light-artwork, where the mercury content shall be limited as follows:
Živo srebro v ročno izdelanih cevnih plinskih sijalkah, ki se uporabljajo za oznake, dekorativno ali arhitekturno in posebno osvetlitev ter svetlobno umetnost, pri čemer se vsebnost živega srebra omeji na naslednji način:
20 mg per electrode pair + 0,3 mg per tube length in cm, but not more than 80 mg, for outdoor applications and indoor applications exposed to temperatures below 20 °C;
20 mg na par elektrod + 0,3 mg na cm dolžine cevi, vendar ne več kot 80 mg, za uporabo na prostem in v zaprtih prostorih, kjer je svetilka izpostavljena temperaturam pod 20 °C;
15 mg per electrode pair + 0,24 mg per tube length in cm, but not more than 80 mg, for all other indoor applications.
15 mg na par elektrod + 0,24 mg na cm dolžine cevi, vendar ne več kot 80 mg, za vsako drugo uporabo v zaprtih prostorih.
Expires on 31 December 2018’
Preneha veljati 31. decembra 2018.“
‘4(g)
„4(g)
amending Annex II to Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration
o spremembi Priloge II k Direktivi 2006/118/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem in poslabšanjem
Having regard to Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration [1], and in particular Article 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/118/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem in poslabšanjem [1] ter zlasti člena 8 Direktive,
Based on the first review under Article 10 of Directive 2006/118/EC, not enough information is available to set new groundwater quality standards in Annex I to that Directive for any pollutants, but technical adaptations in accordance with Article 8 of that Directive are necessary in its Annex II.
Na podlagi prvega pregleda v skladu s členom 10 Direktive 2006/118/ES ni na voljo dovolj informacij, da bi se določili novi standardi kakovosti podzemne vode iz Priloge I k navedeni direktivi za vsa onesnaževala, potrebne pa so tehnične prilagoditve Priloge II v skladu s členom 8 navedene direktive.
Common principles for the determination of background levels need to be applied in order to improve the comparability of threshold values.
Da bi izboljšali primerljivost vrednosti praga, je treba uporabiti skupna načela za določanje vrednosti ozadja.
There is considerable potential for nitrogen and phosphorus in groundwater to present a eutrophication risk to associated surface waters and to directly dependent terrestrial ecosystems.
Obstaja velika verjetnost, da dušik in fosfor v podtalnici pomenita nevarnost evtrofikacije za povezane površinske vode in neposredno odvisne kopenske ekosisteme.
Besides nitrates, already included in Annex I to Directive 2006/118/EC, and ammonium, included in Annex II to that Directive, nitrites, as a contributor to total nitrogen, and total phosphorus, either as such or as phosphates, should also be considered by Member States when establishing threshold values.
Poleg nitratov, ki so že vključeni v Prilogo I k Direktivi 2006/118/ES, in amonija, ki je vključen v Prilogo II k navedeni direktivi, morajo države članice pri določitvi vrednosti praga upoštevati tudi nitrite, ki prispevajo k skupnemu dušiku, in skupni fosfor, bodisi kot tak ali v obliki fosfatov.
The need to obtain and respond to new information on other substances posing a potential risk should be acknowledged.
Priznati bi bilo treba potrebo po pridobitvi novih informacij o drugih snoveh, ki pomenijo morebitno tveganje, in sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe.
Therefore, a watch list for pollutants of groundwater should be established under the Common Implementation Strategy for Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [2] to increase the availability of monitoring data on substances posing a risk or potential risk to bodies of groundwater, and thereby facilitate the identification of substances, including emerging pollutants, for which groundwater quality standards or threshold values should be set.
Zato bi bilo treba določiti nadzorni seznam za onesnaževala podzemne vode v okviru skupne strategije za izvajanje Direktive 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2], s čimer bi se povečala razpoložljivost podatkov spremljanja o snoveh, ki pomenijo tveganje ali morebitno tveganje za telesa podtalne vode, ter olajšala identifikacija snovi, vključno z nastajajočimi onesnaževali, za katere bi bilo treba določiti standarde kakovosti podzemne vode ali vrednosti praga.
The information provided by Member States on the pollutants and indicators for which threshold values have been established, in particular as regards the methodologies related to groundwater chemical status assessment, proved insufficient in the first river basin management plans to enable proper understanding and comparison of the results.
Informacije držav članic o onesnaževalih in kazalnikih, za katere so bile določene vrednosti praga, zlasti glede metodologij, povezanih z oceno kemijskega stanja podzemne vode, so se v prvih načrtih upravljanja povodij izkazale za nezadostne, da bi omogočile ustrezno razumevanje in primerjavo rezultatov.
The relevant requirements regarding the information to be provided should be clarified and complemented in order to ensure the transparency of that assessment.
Zahteve v zvezi z informacijami, ki jih je treba zagotoviti, bi bilo treba pojasniti in dopolniti, da bi se zagotovila preglednost navedene ocene.
The information provided would also facilitate comparison of the chemical status assessment results across the Member States and contribute to a potential future harmonisation of methodologies for establishing groundwater threshold values.
Zagotovljene informacije bi tudi omogočile lažjo primerjavo rezultatov ocenjevanja kemijskega stanja v državah članicah in prispevale k morebitni prihodnji uskladitvi metodologij, ki se uporabljajo za določitev vrednosti praga za podzemne vode.
Directive 2006/118/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Direktivo 2006/118/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee under Article 9 of Directive 2006/118/EC,
Ukrepi iz te direktive so v skladu z mnenjem odbora iz člena 9 Direktive 2006/118/ES –
Annex II to Directive 2006/118/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Directive.
Priloga II k Direktivi 2006/118/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej direktivi.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 24 months from the date of entry into force at the latest.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje v 24 mesecih od datuma začetka veljavnosti.
Done at Brussels, 20 June 2014.
V Bruslju, 20. junija 2014
OJ L 372, 27.12.2006, p. 19.
UL L 372, 27.12.2006, str. 19.
Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1).
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/60/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike (UL L 327, 22.12.2000, str. 1).
Annex II to Directive 2006/118/EC is amended as follows:
Priloga II k Direktivi 2006/118/ES se spremeni:
in Part A, point 3 is replaced by the following:
v delu A se točka 3 nadomesti:
wherever elevated background levels of substances or ions or their indicators occur due to natural hydro-geological reasons, those background levels in the relevant body of groundwater shall be taken into account when establishing threshold values.
Kadar koli se zaradi naravnih hidrogeoloških razlogov pojavijo povečane vrednosti ozadja za snovi ali ione ali njihove kazalnike, se te vrednosti ozadja v zadevnem telesu podzemne vode upoštevajo pri določitvi vrednosti pragov.
When determining background levels, the following principles should be taken into account:
Pri določanju vrednosti ozadja je treba upoštevati naslednja načela:
The determination of background levels should be based on the characterisation of groundwater bodies in accordance with Annex II to Directive 2000/60/EC and on the results of groundwater monitoring in accordance with Annex V to that Directive.
določitev vrednosti ozadja mora temeljiti na opredelitvi tipov teles podzemne vode v skladu s Prilogo II k Direktivi 2000/60/ES in na rezultatih spremljanja podzemne vode v skladu s Prilogo V k navedeni direktivi.
The monitoring strategy and interpretation of the data should take account of the fact that flow conditions and groundwater chemistry vary laterally and vertically;
Pri strategiji spremljanja in razlagi podatkov je treba upoštevati dejstvo, da se stanje toka in kemijsko stanje podzemne vode spreminjata lateralno in vertikalno.
Where only limited groundwater monitoring data are available, more data should be gathered and in the meantime background levels should be determined based on those limited monitoring data, where appropriate by a simplified approach using a subset of samples for which indicators show no influence of human activity.
kadar so na voljo le omejeni podatki spremljanja podzemne vode, je treba zbrati več podatkov, medtem pa vrednosti ozadja določiti na podlagi navedenih omejenih podatkov spremljanja, po potrebi s poenostavljenim postopkom, in sicer z uporabo podniza vzorcev, za katere kazalniki ne kažejo vpliva človekove dejavnosti.
Information on geochemical transfers and processes should also be taken account of, where available;
Upoštevati je treba tudi informacije o geokemičnih prenosih in procesih, če so na voljo.
Where insufficient groundwater monitoring data are available and the information on geochemical transfers and processes is poor, more data and information should be gathered and in the meantime background levels should be estimated, where appropriate based on statistical reference results for the same type of aquifers in other areas having sufficient monitoring data.’
če ni na voljo dovolj podatkov spremljanja podzemne vode, informacije o geokemičnih prenosih in procesih pa so nezadostne, je treba zbrati več podatkov, medtem pa vrednosti ozadja oceniti, kjer je primerno, na podlagi statističnih referenčnih rezultatov za isto vrsto vodonosnikov na drugih območjih, za katera so na voljo zadostni podatki spremljanja.“
in point 1 of Part B, the following entries are added:
v točki 1 dela B se dodajo naslednji vnosi:
‘Nitrites
„nitriti
Phosphorus (total)/Phosphates(3) Part C is replaced by the following:
fosfor (skupni)/fosfati(3) Del C se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Information to be provided by Member States with regard to the pollutants and their indicators for which threshold values have been established
Informacije, ki jih morajo zagotoviti države članice v zvezi z onesnaževali in njihovimi kazalniki, za katere so bile določene vrednosti praga
Member States shall include in the river basin management plans to be submitted in accordance with Article 13 of Directive 2000/60/EC information on the way the procedure set out in Part A of this Annex has been followed.
Države članice v načrt upravljanja povodij, ki ga predložijo v skladu s členom 13 Direktive 2000/60/ES, vključijo informacije o načinu uporabe postopka iz dela A te priloge.
In particular, Member States shall provide:
Države članice zlasti zagotovijo:
information on each of the bodies or groups of bodies of groundwater characterised as being at risk, including the following:
informacije o vseh telesih ali skupinah teles podzemne vode, za katera obstaja tveganje, vključno z naslednjimi informacijami:
the size of the bodies;
velikostjo teles;
each pollutant or indicator of pollution which characterises bodies of groundwater as being at risk;
vsakim onesnaževalom ali kazalnikom onesnaženja, zaradi katerih so telesa podzemne vode ogrožena;
the environmental quality objectives to which the risk is related, including the actual or potential legitimate uses or functions of the groundwater body, and the relationship between the bodies of groundwater and the associated surface waters and directly dependent terrestrial ecosystems;
okoljskimi cilji kakovosti, s katerimi je tveganje povezano, vključno z obstoječimi ali morebitnimi legitimnimi rabami ali funkcijami teles podzemne vode, in razmerjem med telesi podzemne vode in z njo povezanimi površinskimi vodami ter neposredno odvisnimi kopenskimi ekosistemi;
in the case of naturally-occurring substances, the natural background levels in the bodies of groundwater;
v primeru naravno prisotnih snovi, vrednostjo naravnega ozadja v telesih podzemne vode;
information on the exceedances where threshold values are exceeded.
informacijami o preseganjih, kadar so vrednosti praga presežene.
the threshold values, whether they apply at the national level, at the level of the river basin district or the part of the international river basin district falling within the territory of the Member State, or at the level of a body or a group of bodies of groundwater;
vrednosti praga, če se uporabljajo na nacionalni ravni, na ravni območja povodja ali na ravni dela mednarodnega območja povodja, ki je del ozemlja države članice, ali na ravni telesa ali skupine teles podzemne vode;
the relationship between the threshold values and each of the following:
razmerje med vrednostmi praga in elementi, naštetimi v nadaljevanju:
in the case of naturally-occurring substances, the background levels;
vrednostmi naravnega ozadja v primeru naravno prisotnih snovi;
associated surface waters and directly dependent terrestrial ecosystems;
povezanimi površinskimi vodami ter neposredno odvisnimi kopenskimi ekosistemi;
the environmental quality objectives and other standards for water protection that exist at national, Union or international level;
okoljskimi cilji kakovosti in drugimi standardi za varstvo voda na nacionalni ravni, na ravni Unije ali na mednarodni ravni;
the methodology for determining background levels based on the principles set out in point 3 of Part A.
metodologijo za določanje vrednosti ozadja, ki temelji na načelih iz točke 3 dela A;
the reasons for not having established threshold values for any of the pollutants and indicators identified in Part B.
razloge, zaradi katerih niso določile vrednosti praga za onesnaževala in kazalnike iz dela B;
key elements of the groundwater chemical status assessment, including the level, method and period of aggregation of monitoring results, the definition of the acceptable extent of exceedance, and the method for calculating it, in accordance with Article 4(2)(c)(i) and point 3 of Annex III.
ključne elemente ocene kemijskega stanja podzemne vode, vključno s stopnjo, metodo in obdobjem agregacije rezultatov spremljanja, opredelitev sprejemljivega preseganja in metodo za njegov izračun, v skladu s členom 4(2)(c)(i) in točko 3 Priloge III.
Where any of the data referred to in points (a) to (f) are not included in the river basin management plans, Member States shall provide the reasons for this in those plans.’
Kadar podatki iz točk (a) do (f) niso vključeni v načrte upravljanja povodij, države članice razloge za to navedejo v teh načrtih.“
Member States may decide to establish threshold values either for phosphorus (total) or for phosphates.’
Države članice se lahko odločijo določiti mejne vrednosti bodisi za fosfor (skupni) ali za fosfate.“
Commission Implementing Directive 2014/83/EU
Izvedbena direktiva Komisije 2014/83/EU
amending Annexes I, II, III, IV and V to Council Directive 2000/29/EC on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community
o spremembi prilog I, II, III, IV in V k Direktivi Sveta 2000/29/ES o varstvenih ukrepih proti vnosu organizmov, škodljivih za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode, v Skupnost in proti njihovemu širjenju v Skupnosti
Certain parts of the territory of Portugal were recognised as a protected zone with respect to Bemisia tabaci Genn.
Nekateri deli ozemlja Portugalske so bili priznani kot varovana območja glede škodljivega organizma Bemisia tabaci Genn.
Portugal has submitted information showing that Bemisia tabaci is now established in Madeira.
Portugalska je predložila podatke, iz katerih je razvidno, da je Bemisia tabaci zdaj naseljen na Madeiri.
The measures taken in 2013 with a view to the eradication of that harmful organism have proven to be ineffective.
Ukrepi za izkoreninjenje navedenega škodljivega organizma, sprejeti v letu 2013, so se izkazali za neučinkovite.
Madeira should therefore no longer be recognised as part of the protected zone of Portugal in respect of Bemisia tabaci.
Madeira se zato ne bi več smela priznavati kot del varovanega območja Portugalske glede Bemisia tabaci.
Parts B of Annexes I and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC should be amended accordingly.
Del B prilog I in IV k Direktivi 2000/29/ES bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Certain parts of the territory of Spain were recognised as a protected zone with respect to Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Nekateri deli ozemlja Španije so bili priznani kot varovana območja glede škodljivega organizma Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Spain has submitted information showing that Erwinia amylovora is now established in the autonomous communitiy of Aragón, the Comarcas de L'Alt Vinalopó and El Vinalopó Mitjà in the province of Alicante and the municipalities of Alborache and Turís in the province of Valencia (Comunidad Valenciana).
Španija je predložila podatke, iz katerih je razvidno, da je Erwinia amylovora zdaj naseljen v avtonomni skupnosti Aragón, „comarca“ skupnostih Alt Vinalopó in El Vinalopó Mitjà v provinci Alicante ter občinah Alborache in Turis v provinci Valencia (Comunidad Valenciana).
The autonomous community of Aragón, the Comarcas de L'Alt Vinalopó and El Vinalopó Mitjà in the province of Alicante and the municipalities of Alborache and Turís in the province of Valencia (Comunidad Valenciana) should therefore no longer be recognised as part of the protected zone of Spain in respect of Erwinia amylovora.
Avtonomna skupnost Aragón, „comarca“ skupnosti Alt Vinalopó in El Vinalopó Mitjà v provinci Alicante ter občini Alborache in Turis v provinci Valencia (Comunidad Valenciana) se zato ne bi več smele priznavati kot del varovanega območja Španije glede Erwinia amylovora.
Parts B of Annexes II, III and IV to Directive 2000/29/EC should be amended accordingly.
Del B prilog II, III in IV k Direktivi 2000/29/ES bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The entire territory of Ireland was recognised as a protected zone with respect to Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Celotno ozemlje Irske je bilo priznano kot varovano območje glede škodljivega organizma Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Ireland has submitted information showing that Erwinia amylovora is now established in Galway city.
Irska je predložila podatke, iz katerih je razvidno, da je Erwinia amylovora zdaj naseljen v mestu Galway.
The measures were taken between 2005 and 2013 with a view to the eradication of that harmful organism but have proven to be ineffective.
Ukrepi za izkoreninjenje navedenega škodljivega organizma, sprejeti med letoma 2005 in 2013, so se izkazali za neučinkovite.
The city of Galway should therefore no longer be recognised as part of the protected zone of Ireland in respect of Erwinia amylovora.
Mesto Galway se zato ne bi več smelo priznavati kot del varovanega območja Irske glede Erwinia amylovora.
The entire territory of Lithuania was recognised as a protected zone with respect to Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Celotno ozemlje Litve je bilo priznano kot varovano območje glede škodljivega organizma Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Lithuania has submitted information showing that Erwinia amylovora is now established in the municipalities of Kėdainiai and Babtai (region of Kaunas).
Litva je predložila podatke, iz katerih je razvidno, da je Erwinia amylovora zdaj naseljen v občinah Kėdainiai in Babtai (regija Kaunas).
The measures taken for a period of two successive years, 2012 and 2013, with a view to the eradication of that harmful organism have proven to be ineffective.
Ukrepi za izkoreninjenje navedenega škodljivega organizma v obdobju dveh zaporednih let, 2012 in 2013, so se izkazali za neučinkovite.
The municipalities of Kėdainiai and Babtai (region of Kaunas) should therefore no longer be recognised as part of the protected zone of Lithuania in respect of Erwinia amylovora.
Občini Kėdainiai in Babtai (regija Kaunas) se zato ne bi več smeli priznavati kot del varovanega območja Litve glede Erwinia amylovora.
Certain parts of the territory of Slovenia were recognised as a protected zone with respect to Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)
Nekateri deli ozemlja Slovenije so bili priznani kot varovana območja glede škodljivega organizma Erwinia amylovora (Burr.)