natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is appropriate to use the same principles in the EU customs legislation.
Primerno je, da se v carinski zakonodaji EU uporabi ista načela.
Crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells are classified in heading 8541 of the Harmonised System (HS).
Fotonapetostne celice iz kristalnega silicija so uvrščene pod tarifno številko 8541 harmoniziranega sistema (HS).
Crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules or panels are classified in the same heading.
Fotonapetostni moduli ali paneli iz kristalnega silicija so uvrščeni pod isto tarifno številko.
The input material, silicon wafers, is classified in HS heading 3818.
Surovina, silicijeve rezine, so uvrščene pod tarifno številko HS 3818.
The rule based on a change of tariff heading thus adequately expresses the last substantial transformation of the crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells.
Pravilo, ki temelji na spremembi tarifne številke, tako ustrezno odraža zadnjo bistveno predelavo fotonapetostnih celic iz kristalnega silicija.
At the same time it excludes the assembly of the crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels or modules from cells to confer origin to the final product, as both panels and cells are classified in the same heading.
Hkrati pa sestavljanje fotonapetostnih panelov ali modulov iz celic izključuje izmed razlogov za potrditev izvora končnega produkta, saj so paneli in celice uvrščeni pod isto tarifno številko.
An origin rule based on added value, which is usually combined with the change of tariff heading rule for the determination of products for which the last transformation is an assembly operation, is not appropriate in the case of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules or panels, as the necessary predictability and legal certainty would be better attained for those particular products by identifying the most significant production step.
Pravilo o poreklu na podlagi dodane vrednosti – ki se običajno uporablja skupaj s spremembo pravila tarifne številke za določanje proizvodov, za katere je bila zadnja predelava postopek sestavljanja – ni ustrezno v primeru fotonapetostnih modulov ali panelov iz kristalnega silicija, saj bi bilo potrebno predvidljivost in pravno varnost za te posebne proizvode mogoče bolje doseči z opredelitvijo najpomembnejših faz proizvodnje.
A so-called ‘residual’ rule is necessary in order to determine the origin of the crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels or modules where the primary rule of change in tariff heading is not fulfilled.
Tako imenovana „preostala“ pravila so za določitev porekla fotonapetostnih panelov ali modulov iz kristalnega silicija potrebna, kadar ni izpolnjeno primarno pravilo o spremembi tarifne številke.
In that case, the origin of the crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells or of the major portion in value of the crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells should constitute the origin of the panel or module.
V tem primeru poreklo fotonapetostnih celic iz kristalnega silicija ali večinskega vrednostnega deleža v fotonapetostnih celicah iz kristalnega silicija – pomeni poreklo panelov ali modulov.
Crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules or panels may also be classified under certain conditions in HS heading 8501.
Fotonapetostne module ali panele iz kristalnega silicija se lahko pod določenimi pogoji prav tako uvrsti pod tarifno številko HS 8501.
A similar rule as for HS heading 8541 should also be laid down for those crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels or modules.
Podobno pravilo kot za tarifno številko HS 8541 bi bilo treba določiti tudi za te fotonapetostne panele ali module iz kristalnega silicija.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 [4] should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (EGS) št. 2454/93 [4] bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The Customs Code Committee did not deliver an opinion.
Odbor za carinski zakonik ni podal svojega mnenja.
Annex 11 to Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga 11 k Uredbi (EGS) št. 2454/93 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 513/2013 of 4 June 2013 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells and wafers) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China and amending Regulation (EU) No 182/2013 making these imports originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China subject to registration (OJ L 152, 5.6.2013, p. 5).
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 513/2013 z dne 4. junija 2013 o uvedbi začasnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz fotonapetostnih modulov iz kristalnega silicija in njihovih ključnih sestavnih delov (tj. celic in rezin) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki so od tam poslani ter o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2013 ter o uvedbi registracije tega uvoza s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ali ki je od tam poslan (UL L 152, 5.6.2013, str. 5).
Council Decision 94/800/EC (of 22 December 1994) concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations (1986-1994) (OJ L 336, 23.12.1994, p. 1).
Sklep Sveta 94/800/ES z dne 22. decembra 1994 o sklenitvi sporazumov, doseženih v Urugvajskem krogu večstranskih pogajanj (1986 – 1994), v imenu Evropske skupnosti, v zvezi z zadevami, ki so v njeni pristojnosti (UL L 336, 23.12.1994, str. 1).
Annex 11 to Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 is amended as follows:
Priloga 11 k Uredbi (EGS) št. 2454/93 se spremeni:
Between the entries concerning the products classified within CN codes ex8482 and ex8520 the following entry is inserted:
med vnosa o izdelkih, ki se uvrščajo pod oznaki KN ex8482 in ex8520 se vstavi naslednji vnos:
Crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules or panels
Fotonapetostni moduli ali paneli iz kristalnega silicija
Manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product and of heading 8541.
Izdelava iz materialov iz katere koli tarifne številke, razen iz tarifne številke izdelka in tarifne številke 8541.
Where the product is manufactured from materials classified in heading 8501 or 8541, the origin of those materials shall be the origin of the product.
Če je izdelek izdelan iz materialov, uvrščenih pod tarifno številko 8501 ali 8541, je poreklo teh materialov poreklo izdelka.
Where the product is manufactured from materials classified in heading 8501 or 8541 originating in more than one country, the origin of the major portion in value of those materials shall be the origin of the product.’
Če je izdelek izdelan iz materialov, uvrščenih pod tarifno številko 8501 ali 8541, s poreklom iz več kot ene države, je poreklo večinskega vrednostnega deleža teh materialov poreklo izdelka.“
Between the entries concerning the products classified within CN codes ex8528 and ex8542 the following entry is inserted:
Med vnosa o izdelkih, ki se uvrščajo pod oznaki KN ex8528 in ex8542 se vstavi naslednji vnos:
Crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, modules or panels
Fotonapetostne celice, moduli ali paneli iz kristalnega silicija
Where the product is manufactured from materials classified in heading 8541, the origin of those materials shall be the origin of the product.
Če je izdelek izdelan iz materialov, uvrščenih pod tarifno številko 8541, je poreklo teh materialov poreklo izdelka.
Where the product is manufactured from materials classified in heading 8541 originating in more than one country, the origin of the major portion in value of those materials shall be the origin of the product.’
Če je izdelek izdelan iz materialov, uvrščenih pod tarifno številko 8541, s poreklom iz več kot ene države, je poreklo večinskega vrednostnega deleža teh materialov poreklo izdelka.“
By Decision 94/800/EC [3] the Council approved, inter alia, the Agreement on Rules of Origin (WTO-GATT 1994), annexed to the final act signed in Marrakesh on 15 April 1994.
Svet je s Sklepom 94/800/ES [3] med drugim odobril Sporazumom o pravilih o poreklu blaga (WTO - GATT 1994), priložen k sklepni listini, podpisani 15. aprila 1994 v Marakešu.
According to the principles laid down in that Agreement for the Harmonisation Work Program, the determination of the country where goods underwent their last substantial transformation should first of all be based on the country where the production process has led to a change in tariff classification.
V skladu z načeli, določenimi v tem sporazumu za usklajevanje delovnega programa, bi določitev države, v kateri je bilo blago nazadnje bistveno predelano, morala najprej temeljiti na tem, v kateri državi je proizvodni postopek pripeljal do spremembe glede tarifne razvrstitve.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1358/2013
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1358/2013
Council Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013
Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1360/2013
fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for the 2001/2002, 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005 and 2005/2006 marketing years, the coefficient required for calculating the additional levy for the 2001/2002 and 2004/2005 marketing years and the amount to be paid by sugar manufacturers to beet sellers in respect of the difference between the maximum levy and the levy to be charged for the 2002/2003, 2003/2004 and 2005/2006 marketing years
o določitvi zneskov za proizvodne dajatve v sektorju sladkorja za tržna leta 2001/2002, 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005 in 2005/2006, koeficienta za izračun dodatne dajatve za tržni leti 2001/2002 in 2004/2005 ter zneskov, ki jih morajo proizvajalci sladkorja plačati prodajalcem sladkorne pese zaradi razlike med najvišjo dajatvijo in dajatvijo, ki se zaračuna za tržna leta 2002/2003, 2003/2004 in 2005/2006
Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 [1], and in particular the first indent of Article 15(8), Article 16(5), and Article 18(5), empowered the Commission to adopt detailed rules on the basic production levy and the B levy to be collected from quota holders operating in the framework of the common organisation of markets in the sugar sector, the coefficient for the calculation of an additional levy, and the repayment or recovery of part of the levies from beet sellers.
V skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1260/2001 [1], zlasti prvo alineo člena 15(8), členom 16(5) in členom 18(5), je Komisija pooblaščena za sprejetje podrobnih pravil glede osnovnih proizvodnih dajatev in B dajatev, ki jih je treba zaračunati imetnikom kvot, ki delujejo v okviru skupne ureditve trgov za sladkor, koeficienta za izračun dodatne dajatve in plačila ali delnega povračila dajatev prodajalcem sladkorne pese.
The Commission established the production levies for the 2001/2002 [2], 2002/2003 [3], 2003/2004 [4], 2004/2005 [5] and 2005/2006 [6] marketing years.
Komisija je določila proizvodne dajatve za tržna leta 2001/2002 [2], 2002/2003 [3], 2003/2004 [4], 2004/2005 [5] in 2005/2006 [6].
Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 provided that when a basic production levy was lower than the maximum amount referred to in Article 15(3) or when the B levy referred to in that Article was lower than the maximum amount referred to in Article 15(4) of that Regulation, adjusted, where necessary, in accordance with Article 15(5), sugar manufacturers were to pay back beet sellers 60 % of the difference between the maximum amount of the levy concerned and the levy to be charged.
V členu 18(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 je določeno, da morajo proizvajalci sladkorja v primeru, ko je znesek osnovne proizvodne dajatve nižji od najvišjega zneska iz člena 15(3) ali ko je dajatev B iz navedenega člena nižja od najvišjega zneska iz člena 15(4) navedene uredbe, po potrebi popravljenega v skladu z s členom 15(5), prodajalcem sladkorne pese povrniti 60 % razlike med najvišjim zneskom zadevne dajtve in dajatvijo, ki se zaračuna.
In accordance with Article 9(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 314/2002 [7], the amount to be paid by sugar manufacturers to beet sellers in respect of the difference between the maximum basic production levy and the B levy and the chargeable levy, were set for the 2002/2003 [8], 2003/2004 [9] and 2005/2006 [10] marketing years.
V skladu s členom 9(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 314/2002 [7] je bil za tržna leta 2002/2003 [8], 2003/2004 [9] in 2005/2006 [10] določen znesek, ki ga morajo proizvajalci sladkorja plačati prodajalcem sladkorne pese zaradi razlike med najvišjo osnovno dajatvijo in dajatvo B ter zaračunanimi dajatvami.
In the framework of the reform of the common market organisation for the sugar sector, Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 [11] repealed and replaced Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 as of the 2006/2007 marketing year.
V okviru reforme skupne tržne ureditve za sektor sladkorja je Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 318/2006 [11] razveljavila in nadomestila Uredbo (ES) št. 1260/2001 od tržnega leta 2006/2007 naprej.
Regulation (EC) No 318/2006, which was subsequently repealed and incorporated into Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 [12], replaced the variable sugar production levy system of self-financing the production quota regime by a new production charge aimed at contributing to the financing of the expenditure occurring in the sugar sector under the common market organisation for sugar.
Uredba (ES) št. 318/2006, ki je bila pozneje razveljavljena in vključena v Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 [12], je sistem variabilnih proizvodnih dajatev za sladkor s samofinanciranjem ureditve proizvodnih kvot nadomestila z novo proizvodno dajatvijo, katere cilj je prispevati k financiranju odhodkov, ki nastanejo v sektorju sladkorja v okviru skupne ureditve trga za sladkor.
On 8 May 2008, in joined cases C-5/06 and C-23/06 to C-36/06, the Court of Justice declared Commission Regulations (EC) No 1762/2003 [13] and (EC) No 1775/2004 [14] invalid.
Sodišče je 8. maja 2008 v skupnih zadevah C-5/06 in C-23/06 do C-36/06 razglasilo, da sta uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1762/2003 [13] in (ES) št. 1775/2004 [14] neveljavni.
In its judgment, the Court held that all quantities of sugar in exported products, regardless of whether or not export refunds were actually paid, were to be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the estimated average loss per tonne of product.
Sodišče je razsodilo, da je treba pri izračunu ocenjene povprečne izgube na tono proizvoda upoštevati vse količine sladkorja v izvoženih izdelkih, ne glede na to, ali so bila izvozna nadomestila dejansko plačana ali ne.
The Court, in joined cases C-175/07 to C-184/07, and in cases C-466/06 and C-200/06, also declared Commission Regulation (EC) No 1686/2005 [15] invalid.
Sodišče je v skupnih zadevah C-175/07 do C-184/07 in v zadevah C-466/06 in C-200/06 razglasilo za neveljavno tudi Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1686/2005 [15].
In order to comply with the Court’s rulings, the Commission adopted Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 [16].
Za uskladitev s sodbami Sodišča je Komisija sprejela Uredbo (ES) št. 1193/2009 [16].
On 29 September 2011, the General Court delivered its judgment in case T-4/06, in which it stated that there was no proper legal basis for a differentiated coefficient for the additional levy in the sugar sector and annulled Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1686/2005, as amended by Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009.
Splošno sodišče je 29. septembra 2011 izreklo sodbo v zadevi T-4/06, v kateri je navedlo, da ni bilo ustrezne pravne podlage za diferencirani koeficient za dodatno dajatev v sektorju sladkorja, in je razveljavilo člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1686/2005, kakor je bil spremenjen s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 1193/2009.
On 27 September 2012, in joined cases C-113/10, C-147/10 and C-234/10, the Court declared Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 invalid, stating that, for the purpose of calculating the estimated average loss per tonne of product, Article 15(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 was to be interpreted as meaning that the total refund amount includes the total amount of export refunds effectively paid.
Sodišče je 27. septembra 2012 v skupnih zadevah C-113/10, C-147/10 in C-234/10 razglasilo Uredbo (ES) št. 1193/2009 za neveljavno in navedlo, da bi bilo treba za izračun ocenjene povprečne izgube na tono proizvoda člen 15(1)(d) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 razlagati tako, da bi moral biti v izračun za znesek za povrnitev vključen skupni znesek dejansko plačanih izvoznih plačil.
Consequently, levies in the sugar sector should be fixed at the appropriate level.
Zato bi bilo treba dajatve v sektorju sladkorja določiti na ustrezni ravni.
For exports defined in accordance with Article 6(5) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 314/2002, the ‘average loss’, within the meaning of Article 15(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, should be calculated by dividing the refunds effectively paid by the exported quantities, regardless of whether or not a refund has been paid.
Za izvoz, opredeljen v skladu s členom 6(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 314/2002, bi bilo treba „povprečne izgube“ v smislu člena 15(1)(d) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 izračunati tako, da se dejansko plačana nadomestila delijo z izvoženimi količinami, ne glede na to, ali je bilo nadomestilo plačano ali ne.
The ‘exportable surplus’, within the meaning of Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, should also be calculated by using all exports, regardless of whether or not a refund has been paid.
„Izvozni presežek“ v smislu člena 15(1)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 bi bilo prav tako treba izračunati ob upoštevanju vsega izvoza, ne glede na to, ali je bilo nadomestilo plačano ali ne.
Considering that the method used to calculate the levies for the 2001/2002 marketing year was the same as that invalidated by the Court, the production levies and the coefficient for the additional levy for the 2001/2002 marketing year should also be corrected accordingly.
Glede na to, da je bila za izračun dajatev za tržno leto 2001/2002 uporabljena ista metoda, kot jo je Sodišče razveljavilo, bi bilo treba ustrezno popraviti tudi proizvodne dajatve in koeficient za dodatno dajatev za tržno leto 2001/2002.
It follows from the Court’s judgement that the corrected levies should apply from the same dates as the levies which were declared invalid.
Iz sodbe Sodišča sledi, da bi se morale popravljene dajatve uporabljati od istih datumov kot razveljavljene dajatve.
As a result of the fixing of the sugar levies in accordance with the method referred to in recital 11, the amount to be paid by sugar manufacturers to beet sellers in respect of the difference between the maximum levy and the levy chargeable for the 2002/2003, 2003/2004 and 2005/2006 marketing years should also be newly set, and should be applicable retroactively.
Kot posledica določitev dajatev za sladkor v skladu z metodo iz uvodne izjave 11 bi bilo treba na novo določiti tudi znesek, ki ga proizvajalci sladkorja plačajo prodajalcem sladkorne pese zaradi razlike med najvišjo dajatvijo in zaračunano dajatvijo za tržna leta 2002/2003, 2003/2004 in 2005/2006, in ga uporabiti retroaktivno.
For the 2001/2002 marketing year, the uncovered overall loss calculated following the method referred to in recital 11 amounts to EUR 14123937. The coefficient referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 should be set accordingly and should be applicable retroactively for that marketing year.
Za tržno leto 2001/2002 skupna nepokrita izguba, izračunana po metodi iz uvodne izjave 11, znaša 14123937 EUR. Koeficient iz člena 16(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 bi bilo treba ustrezno določiti in ga uporabiti retroaktivno za navedeno tržno leto.
For the 2002/2003 marketing year, the application of the method referred to in recital 11 results in 2 % for the basic production levy and 16,371 % for the B levy, which should be applicable retroactively for that marketing year. The recalculated overall loss is covered in its entirety by the receipts from the basic production levy and the B levy.
Uporaba metode iz uvodne izjave 11 za tržno leto 2002/2003 pomeni osnovno proizvodno dajatev v višini 2 % in dajatev B v višini 16,371 %, ki bi ju bilo treba retroaktivno uporabiti za navedeno tržno leto.
Therefore, there is no need to fix the additional coefficient referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 for that marketing year.
Preračunana skupna izguba se v celoti pokrije s prihodki iz osnovne proizvodne dajatve in dajatve B. Zato ni potrebe po določitvi dodatnega koeficienta iz člena 16(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 za navedeno tržno leto.
For the 2002/2003 marketing year, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1440/2002 [17] set the maximum amount of the B levy at 37,5 % of the intervention price for white sugar.
Za tržno leto 2002/2003 je bil z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1440/2002 [17] je bil določen najvišji znesek dajatve B v višini 37,5 % intervencijske cene za beli sladkor.
However, the B levy applicable for that marketing year, revised according to the method referred to in recital 11 is 16,371 % of the intervention price for white sugar.
Dajatev B, spremenjena v skladu z metodo iz uvodne izjave 11, pa za navedeno tržno leto znaša 16,371 % intervencijske cene za beli sladkor.
This difference requires that the amount payable by sugar manufacturers to beet sellers be fixed per tonne of beet of standard quality for that marketing year, in accordance with Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.
Zaradi te razlike bi bilo treba v skladu s členom 18(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 zneske za navedeno tržno leto, ki jih morajo proizvajalci sladkorja plačati prodajalcem sladkorne pese, določiti na tono sladkorne pese standardne kakovosti.
For the 2003/2004 marketing year, the application of the method referred to in recital 11 results in 2 % for the basic production levy and 17,259 % for the B levy. The recalculated overall loss is covered in its entirety by the receipts from the basic production levy and the B levy.
Uporaba metode iz uvodne izjave 11 za tržno leto 2003/2004 pomeni osnovno proizvodno dajatev v višini 2 % in dajatev B v višini 17,259 %.
For the 2003/2004 marketing year, Regulation (EC) No 1440/2002 set the maximum amount of the B levy at 37,5 % of the intervention price for white sugar.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1440/2002 je bil za tržno leto 2003/2004 določen najvišji znesek dajatve B v višini 37,5 % intervencijske cene za beli sladkor.
However, the B levy applicable for that marketing year, revised according to the method referred to in recital 11, is 17,259 % of the intervention price for white sugar.
Dajatev B za navedeno tržno leto, spremenjena v skladu z metodo iz uvodne izjave 11, pa znaša 17,259 % intervencijske cene za beli sladkor.
It follows from the Court’s judgement referred to in recital 9 that the coefficient should be uniform for the Member States of the Union as constituted on 30 April 2004 and the Member States of the Union as constituted on 1 May 2004.
Iz sodbe Sodišča, navedene v uvodni izjavi 9, sledi, da bi moral biti koeficient za države članice Unije v sestavi 30. aprila 2004 in za države članice Unije v sestavi 1. maja 2004 enoten.
For the 2005/2006 marketing year, the application of the method referred to in recital 11 results in an amount of 1,2335 % for the basic production levy without the need for a B levy.
Uporaba metode iz uvodne izjave 11 za tržno leto 2005/2006 pomeni osnovno proizvodnjo dajatev v višini 1,2335 %, dajatev B pa ni potrebna.
The recalculated overall loss is covered in its entirety by the receipts from the basic production levy and there is no need to fix the additional coefficient referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 for that marketing year.
Preračunana skupna izguba se v celoti pokrije s prihodki iz osnovne proizvodne dajatve in ni potrebe po določitvi dodatnega koeficienta iz člena 16(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 za navedeno tržno leto.
For the 2005/2006 marketing year, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1296/2005 [18] set the maximum amount of the B levy at 37,5 % of the intervention price for white sugar.
Z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1296/2005 [18] je bil za tržno leto 2005/2006 določen najvišji znesek dajatve B v višini 37,5 % intervencijske cene za beli sladkor.