natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
GOC referred to the provisions of the Commercial Banking Law which stipulates that the banks shall carry out their business in accordance with the law (Article 4) and there shall be no interference by local governments or government departments at various levels, public organisations or individuals in the business operation of the banks (Article 5).
Kitajska vlada se je sklicevala na določbe zakona o poslovnem bančništvu, ki predvideva, da banke poslujejo v skladu z zakonom (člen 4) ter da se v njihovo poslovanje ne vmešavajo lokalne vlade ali vladne službe na več ravneh, javne organizacije ali posamezniki (člen 5).
The fact is that the GOC made a statement in the questionnaire reply and it was not able to support it all.
Dejstvo je, da je kitajska vlada v izpolnjenem vprašalniku izrazila trditev, ki je ni mogla v celoti podpreti.
The banks which the Commission attempted to verify were also not able to support this information with any information whatsoever.
Banke, ki jih je Komisija poskušala preveriti, prav tako niso mogle podpreti teh informacij z nobenimi drugimi informacijami.
If this is to be considered as acceptable practice, the investigated party could simply make any statement which supports its case and the investigated authority would have to accept it without having a chance to verify whether it represents reality.
Če bi bila to sprejemljiva praksa, bi lahko preiskovana stran enostavno navedla trditev, ki podpira njen primer, preiskovalni organ pa bi moral to trditev sprejeti, ne da bi imel možnost preveriti, ali ustreza dejanskemu stanju.
This is even more important taking into account that this particular information is in contradiction with other information on the file.
To je še pomembneje glede na to, da so te informacije v nasprotju z drugimi informacijami v spisu.
There are also other articles in the Commercial Banking Law which oblige the banks to carry out their loan business upon the needs of national economy and the social development and with the spirit of the state industrial policies (Article 34).
Zakon o poslovnem bančništvu vsebuje tudi druge člene, ki bankam nalagajo, da svojo posojilno dejavnost izvajajo v skladu s potrebami nacionalnega gospodarstva in družbenega razvoja ter v duhu industrijskih politik države (člen 34).
As correctly pointed out by the GOC in its comments, the banks shall carry out their business activities in accordance with law, i.e. also with the said provisions of Article 34 of the Commercial Banking Law.
Kot je kitajska vlada ustrezno opozorila v pripombah, banke poslujejo v skladu z zakonom, tj. tudi v skladu z navedenimi določbami člena 34 zakona o poslovnem bančništvu.
Therefore, this supposed bright line between the government and the banks was not borne out by the facts.
Zato ta domnevna vidna ločnica med vlado in bankami ne izhaja iz dejstev.
The GOC claimed that it provided all the information in respect to the ownership of the banks that it possesses.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da je zagotovila vse informacije v zvezi z lastništvom bank, ki jih ima na voljo.
It also claimed that the reported figures concerning bank ownership are the official figures of CBRC and therefore there was no reason to believe that the information provided by the GOC is false or misleading and apply provisions of Article 28 of the basic Regulation.
Prav tako je trdila, da so navedeni podatki v zvezi z lastništvom bank uradni podatki Komisije bančnih regulatorjev Kitajske in da zato ni nobenega razloga za domnevo, da so informacije, ki jih je predložila kitajska vlada, napačne ali zavajajoče, poleg tega pa izpolnjujejo določbe člena 28 osnovne uredbe.
Further the GOC stated that it was not aware what the source for the Commission statement in paragraph 95 (replicated in recital (127) above) of the definitive disclosure document was (‘The publicly available information suggests that there are also other state-owned banks which provided loans to the sampled exporting producers’), i.e. in addition to those reported by the GOC as being state-owned in its reply to the deficiency letter.
Poleg tega je kitajska vlada trdila, da ni vedela, na kateri podlagi temelji izjava Komisije v odstavku 95 (ponovljeno v uvodni izjavi (127)) dokumenta o dokončnem razkritju („V skladu z javno razpoložljivimi informacijami naj bi obstajale tudi druge državne banke, ki so odobrile posojila vzorčenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom.“), tj. poleg tistih, ki jih je kitajska vlada v svojem odgovoru na poziv k dopolnitvi navedla kot državne banke.
These claims could not be accepted.
Teh trditev ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.
It is noted that the GOC initially claimed in its questionnaire reply that it does not possess any information concerning its ownership in the banks.
Poudariti je treba, da je kitajska vlada v izpolnjenem vprašalniku sprva trdila, da nima na voljo nobenih informacij v zvezi z lastništvom bank.
Only after the Commission pointed out in the deficiency letter that, according to the Chinese legislation, the GOC must collect such information, did the GOC provide some information in this respect.
Šele ko je Komisija v pozivu k dopolnitvi poudarila, da mora kitajska vlada v skladu s kitajsko zakonodajo zbrati take informacije, je kitajska vlada predložila določene informacije v zvezi s tem.
During the verification the CBRC official refused to support the figures on bank ownership with any evidence, refused to provide the source of the information and did not explain where it comes from.
Uradnik Komisije bančnih regulatorjev Kitajske med preverjanjem ni podprl podatkov o lastništvu bank z nobenimi dokazi, ni navedel vira informacij in ni pojasnil, do kod informacije prihajajo.
It is also noted that the GOC did not contest the fact that at least 5 other banks named by the Commission in the definitive disclosure document (see footnote in recital (127)) are state-owned.
Prav tako je treba poudariti, da kitajska vlada ni izpodbijala dejstva, da je v državni lasti najmanj 5 drugih bank, ki jih je navedla Komisija v dokumentu o dokončnem razkritju (glej opombo v uvodni izjavi (127)).
The GOC disagreed with the statement in the paragraph 97 of the definitive disclosure document (replicated in the recital (129) above) that CBRC refused to answer the question concerning the 10 biggest banks in China because it was not submitted in writing and claimed that the Commission misinterpreted the facts, because the main reason for not replying was that since this question was not in the pre-verification letter they needed time to prepare for it.
Kitajska vlada se ni strinjala z izjavo Komisije v odstavku 97 dokumenta o dokončnem razkritju (ponovljeno v uvodni izjavi (129)), da Komisija bančnih regulatorjev Kitajske ni želela odgovoriti na vprašanje v zvezi z 10 največjimi bankami na Kitajskem, ker vprašanje ni bilo predloženo v pisni obliki, in je trdila, da je Komisija napačno tolmačila dejstva, saj je bil glavni razlog za to, da odgovor ni bil predložen, dejstvo, da vprašanje ni bilo navedeno v predpreveritvenem pismu, zato so potrebovali čas za pripravo odgovora.
In fact it is the GOC which misinterprets the facts concerning this issue.
Dejansko je kitajska vlada tista, ki napačno tolmači dejstva v zvezi s tem.
The Commission did not insist on immediate answer, but the CBRC refused to even look at the question on the pretext that it was not provided in advance in writing.
Komisija ni zahtevala takojšnjega odgovora, vendar Komisija bančnih regulatorjev Kitajske vprašanja ni želela niti prebrati, ker ni bilo vnaprej predloženo v pisni obliki.
If the reason was insufficient time to prepare the answer the GOC could have submitted the reply later during the verification or by email (although without possibility for the Commission to verify it) as it has done with several other documents.
Če je bil razlog nezadosten čas za pripravo odgovora, bi lahko kitajska vlada odgovor predložila pozneje med preverjanjem ali po elektronski pošti (čeprav ga Komisija ne bi mogla preveriti), kot je storila z več drugimi dokumenti.
However the GOC did not do this.
Vendar kitajska vlada tega ni storila.
GOC claimed that it provided all the documents concerning the establishment and the mandate of the CBRC which the Commission requested in the questionnaire, and that since the Commission did not raise any issues with this in the deficiency letter and did not ask for this documents in the ‘list of documents to be provided before the start of verification visit’ in Annex 2 to the pre-verification letter the GOC did not feel obliged to provide any other documents.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da je predložila vse dokumente v zvezi z ustanovitvijo in mandatom Komisije bančnih regulatorjev Kitajske, ki jih je Komisija zahtevala v vprašalniku, in da Komisija v pozivu k dopolnitvi ni opozorila na te dokumente, prav tako pa teh dokumentov ni zahtevala v „seznamu dokumentov, ki jih je treba predložiti pred začetkom preveritvenega obiska“ v Prilogi 2 k predpreveritvenem pismu, zato se kitajska vlada ni čutila dolžno predložiti druge dokumente.
This is not true.
To ne drži.
The Commission requested all documents which were basis for the establishment and the mandate of the CBRC but the GOC provided only some of them.
Komisija je zahtevala vse dokumente, ki so podlaga za ustanovitev in mandat Komisije bančnih regulatorjev Kitajske, vendar jih je kitajska vlada predložila le nekaj.
It was only on the basis of the statement of the CBRC official that the Commission learned that there are also other documents in this respect.
Šele na podlagi izjave uradnika Komisije bančnih regulatorjev Kitajske je Komisija ugotovila, da obstajajo še drugi dokumenti v zvezi s tem.
In fact the reply of the GOC in the questionnaire in this respect was incomplete and misleading as the GOC (CBRC) clearly knew about the existence of such additional documents as was admitted by the CBRC during on-the-spot verification.
Dejansko je bil odgovor kitajske vlade v zvezi s tem v vprašalniku nepopoln in zavajajoč, saj je bila kitajska vlada (Komisija bančnih regulatorjev Kitajske) očitno seznanjena z obstojem takih dodatnih dokumentov, kot je priznala Komisija bančnih regulatorjev Kitajske med preverjanjem na kraju samem.
The GOC claimed that during the verification the Commission did not actually request the statistics and reports from the banks which provided loans to the sampled exporters for the IP.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da Komisija med preverjanjem dejansko ni zahtevala statističnih podatkov in poročil bank, ki so odobrile posojila vzorčenim izvoznikom za OP.
They claimed that the Commission only requested the 2012 statistical report submitted to the CBRC by the Bank of China and for this the CBRC official had to check with the legal services involved due to the confidentiality obligations.
Trdila je, da je Komisija zahtevala le statistično poročilo za leto 2012, ki ga je Komisiji bančnih regulatorjev Kitajske predložila Banka Kitajske in v zvezi s katerim se je moral uradnik te komisije zaradi obveznosti glede zaupnosti posvetovati s pravno službo.
During the verification the Commission repeated its request from the questionnaire and deficiency letter for the statistics from all banks which provided loans to sampled exporters to be provided [87].
Komisija je med preverjanjem ponovno izrazila zahtevo iz vprašalnika in poziva k dopolnitvi, da je treba predložiti statistične podatke vseh bank, ki so odobrile posojila vzorčenim izvoznikom [87].
The GOC further claimed that the reference of the complainant in the complaint to the Coated Fine Paper case in which the Commission found ‘on the basis of adverse inferences’ that the SOCBs were acting as public bodies is an ‘unsubstantiated assertion lacking context with regard to the nature and existence of a subsidy granted to the exporting producers of the product concerned and cannot therefore be considered as a sufficient evidence’ of the existence of financial contribution by a government or public body within the meaning of Article 11.2 of the SCM Agreement.
Kitajska vlada je prav tako trdila, da je navedba pritožnika v pritožbi v zadevi premazanega finega papirja, v kateri je Komisija „na podlagi negativnih sklepov“ ugotovila, da so poslovne banke v državni lasti ravnale kot javni organi, „neutemeljena trditev, ki ne upošteva ozadja glede vrste in obstoja subvencije, odobrene proizvajalcem izvoznikom zadevnega izdelka, zato je ni mogoče šteti za zadosten dokaz“ obstoja finančnega prispevka vlade ali javnega organa v smislu člena 11.2 Sporazuma SIU.
Firstly it must be pointed out that the findings concerned in the Coated Fine Paper case were not based on adverse inferences but on facts available in accordance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation and there is no subsequent ruling which would confirm the claim of the GOC that the Commission finding in this respect is based on the ‘improper’ use of facts available.
Treba je poudariti, da zadevne ugotovitve v zadevi premazanega finega papirja niso temeljile na negativnih sklepih, ampak na razpoložljivih dejstvih v skladu s členom 28 osnovne uredbe, ter da ni bil sprejet noben naknadni sklep, ki bi potrjeval trditev kitajske vlade, da ugotovitev Komisije v zvezi s tem temelji na „neustrezni uporabi razpoložljivih dejstev“.
The GOC continued to claim that the Commission requested certain information from all banks established in China and that it was not within the GOC's practical ability to provide such information for ‘over 3800’ banks.
Kitajska vlada je še naprej trdila, da je Komisija zahtevala določene informacije od vseh bank, ustanovljenih na Kitajskem, pri čemer kitajska vlada ni imela dejanske zmožnosti za predložitev takih informacij za „več kot 3800“ bank.
The Commission disagrees with this claim and once again refers to the deficiency letter where, following the GOC reply to the questionnaire, it limited the scope of the information requested only to banks where the GOC has direct or indirect shareholdership [89].
Komisija se s to trditvijo ne strinja in se ponovno sklicuje na poziv k dopolnitvi, v katerem je po predložitvi izpolnjenega vprašalnika s strani kitajske vlade omejila obseg zahtevanih informacij le na banke, v katerih ima kitajska vlada neposredni ali posredni lastniški delež [89].
GOC also claimed that the Commission statement that it took account of the summary of the PBOC circulars in question from the website submitted during the verification is incorrect and that this is proved by paragraph 133 of the definitive disclosure documents (replicated in recital (164) above).
Kitajska vlada je trdila tudi, da izjava Komisije, da je upoštevala povzetek zadevnih okrožnic Ljudske banke Kitajske s spletišča, ki je bil predložen med preverjanjem, ni pravilna in da to dokazuje odstavek 133 dokumenta o dokončnem razkritju (ponovljeno v uvodni izjavi (164)).
The recital (164) does not contradict the content of the website extracts.
Uvodna izjava (164) ne nasprotuje vsebini izvlečkov s spletišča.
It takes it into account but also relies on the actual content of the Circular which was, in fact, never contested by the GOC to date as not being accurate.
Te izvlečke upošteva, vendar se opira tudi na dejansko vsebino okrožnice, katere točnosti kitajska vlada doslej dejansko ni izpodbijala.
The GOC claimed that the Commission ‘has extracted certain terms and phrases out of context from various documents’, misinterpreted others and tried to tie them together in order to establish that the GOC promotes the industry producing product concerned or to establish that the SOCBS are public bodies.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da je Komisija „iz več dokumentov vzela nekatere izraze in besedilo brez upoštevanja sobesedila“, nekatere pa je napačno tolmačila ter jih skušala povezati, da bi ugotovila, da kitajska vlada spodbuja industrijo, ki proizvaja zadevni izdelek, ali da so poslovne banke v državni lasti javni organi.
It argues that a ‘complete reading’ of these documents (plans, outlines and decisions) would demonstrate that the Commission's findings lack legal basis and are not based on evidence.
Zagovarja stališče, da bi „celovito branje“ teh dokumentov (načrtov, osnutkov in sklepov) pokazalo, da ugotovitve Komisije nimajo pravne podlage in se ne opirajo na dokaze.
The Commission analysed and considered all the documents, including those referred to in recital (102) in their totality, in exactly the manner which the GOC advocates.
Komisija je analizirala in v celoti upoštevala vse dokumente, vključno s tistimi iz uvodne izjave (102), na točno tak način, ki ga zagovarja kitajska vlada.
Concerning the Decision No 40, the GOC claimed that in the definitive disclosure document the Commission quoted from it out of contexts ‘to distort its correct meaning’.
V zvezi s Sklepom št. 40 je kitajska vlada trdila, da je Komisija v dokumentu o dokončnem razkritju navajala iz navedenega sklepa brez upoštevanja sobesedila, „da bi izkrivila njegov pravi pomen“.
According to the GOC it is clear from other provisions of Decision No 40 that it is geared towards the development of the use of renewable energy sources rather than classifying solar modules and cells as target of any expected development policy as proposed by the Commission.
Po mnenju kitajske vlade je iz drugih določb Sklepa št. 40 razvidno, da je usmerjen v razvoj uporabe obnovljivih virov energije ter solarnih modulov in celic ne opredeljuje kot cilj kakršne koli pričakovane politike razvoja, kot je predlagala Komisija.
It is not true that the Commission's reference to the text of Article V of the Decision No 40 was out of context.
Ni res, da Komisija pri sklicevanju na besedilo člena V Sklepa št. 40 ni upoštevala sobesedila.
The Commission is not arguing whether one of the purposes was or was not the development of the use of renewable energy sources.
Komisija ne trdi, da je bil ali ni bil eden od namenov razvoj uporabe obnovljivih virov energije.
The fact is that in the Decision No 40 the State Council identified new energy industry and solar energy as prioritised industries and therefore they fell under the encouraged category of projects in the Guiding Catalogue of the Industrial Restructuring.
Dejstvo je, da je državni svet v Sklepu št. 40 opredelil novo energetsko industrijo in sončno energijo kot prednostni industriji, zato sta bili v glavnem katalogu industrijskega prestrukturiranja uvrščeni v kategorijo spodbujanih projektov.
Taking into account Articles 17, 18 and 19 of the Decision No 40 the financial institutions may only grant loans to industries/companies belonging to this category.
Ob upoštevanju členov 17, 18 in 19 Sklepa št. 40 lahko finančne institucije odobrijo posojila le industrijam/družbam, ki sodijo v to kategorijo.
This is a clear indication that the PV industry producing, inter alia, solar modules and cells is prioritised.
To je jasen znak, da se daje prednost fotonapetostni industriji, ki med drugim proizvaja solarne module in celice.
The GOC claimed that there is no reference in the text of the State Council Decision of 10 October to the solar modules and cells or to the PV industry and that if any fiscal support has been encouraged it is with regard to the objectives pertaining to the use of alternative energy which have no bearing on the development of module and cell production in general.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da se besedilo sklepa državnega sveta z dne 10. oktobra ne sklicuje na solarne module in celice ali na fotonapetostno industrijo ter da se je morebitna fiskalna podpora spodbujala le v zvezi s cilji glede uporabe nadomestnih virov energije, ki ne vplivajo na splošen razvoj proizvodnje modulov in celic.
The Commission disagrees.
Komisija se s tem ne strinja.
It must be noted that this Decision of State Council does not seem to aim exclusively on the promotion of the use of alternative energy sources.
Poudariti je treba, da ta sklep državnega sveta ni izrecno namenjen spodbujanju uporabe nadomestnih virov energije.
From its title (Decision of the State Council on Accelerating the Incubation and Development of Strategic Emerging Industries) as well as from the content (inter alia Articles 1(1),1(2),2(2)) it is clear that he aim is to support the development of selected industries (in this case strategic emerging industries).
Iz naslova (Sklep državnega sveta o pospeševanju inkubacije in razvoja strateških nastajajočih industrij) in vsebine (med drugim člena 1(1) in (2) ter člena 2(2)) tega sklepa je razvidno, da je njegov namen spodbujati razvoj izbranih industrij (v tem primeru strateških nastajajočih industrij).
This is also confirmed by the fact that the objectives set in this Decision pertain directly to the output and performance of the strategic emerging industries (Article 2(3). Also, there is clear link in the Decision between strategic emerging industries and the PV industry which produces, inter alia, solar modules and cells. Firstly there is no doubt that the PV industry is a segment of alternative energy industry which is referred to in Article 2 of the Decision as an industry the state should incubate and develop. Secondly the sampled exporting producers belong to the category of high-tech industries which are mentioned in Article 2(2) of the Decision. Similarly the 12th five-year plan includes the solar power industry amongst the strategic industries and also the 12th Five Year Plan for the Solar Photovoltaic Industry confirms that the State Council Decision ‘has listed solar photovoltaic industry in important field of strategic emerging industries, which our country will develop in the future’. [90]
To potrjuje tudi dejstvo, da se cilji, zastavljeni v tem sklepu, nanašajo neposredno na rezultate in učinkovitost strateških nastajajočih industrij (člen 2(3)). Prav tako ta sklep jasno povezuje strateške nastajajoče industrije s fotonapetostno industrijo, ki med drugim proizvaja solarne module in celice. Prvič, nobenega dvoma ni, da je fotonapetostna industrija segment industrije nadomestne energije, ki je v členu 2 sklepa opredeljena kot industrija, ki bi jo morala država inkubirati in razviti. Drugič, vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki sodijo v kategorijo visokotehnoloških sektorjev industrije, navedenih v členu 2(2) sklepa. Podobno 12. petletni načrt uvršča industrijo sončne energije med strateške industrije, poleg tega pa 12. petletni načrt za solarno fotonapetostno industrijo potrjuje, da je sklep državnega sveta „uvrstil solarno fotonapetostno industrijo na pomembno področje strateških nastajajočih industrij, ki jo bo naša država razvila v prihodnosti“ [90].
According to the GOC, the Commission cited the Medium and Long-term Science and Technology Plan but failed to refer to single instance or provision where this document defines high-technology enterprises as including module and cell producing enterprises or the PV industry in general.
Po mnenju kitajske vlade je Komisija navedla načrt za srednje- in dolgoročni razvoj znanosti in tehnologije, vendar se ni sklicevala na primer ali določbo, v kateri ta dokument opredeljuje, da visokotehnološka podjetja vključujejo podjetja, ki proizvajajo module in celice, ali so povezana s fotonapetostno industrijo na splošno.
According to the GOC the objectives of the Outline are only focused towards developing of alternative energy sources to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.
Kitajska vlada meni, da so cilji načrta osredotočeni le na razvoj nadomestnih virov energije, da bi zmanjšali odvisnost od fosilnih goriv.
The majority of the investigated sampled exporting producers have been awarded high and new-technology enterprise certificates and on this basis benefited from subsidies the provision of which was limited to high and new-technology enterprises (e.g. tax exemptions).
Večina preiskovanih vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je prejela certifikat visokotehnoloških podjetij in podjetij z novo tehnologijo, na tej podlagi pa so prejeli subvencije, katerih zagotavljanje je bilo omejeno na visokotehnološka podjetja in podjetja z novo tehnologijo (npr. v obliki davčnih oprostitev).
The same types of individual support programmes which are mentioned in this Plan were used by the sampled exporters.
Vzorčeni izvozniki so uporabljali iste vrste posameznih podpornih programov, kot so navedeni v tem načrtu.