natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Only physical treatments are permitted at the mill (cooling with cold air and turning the grain).
S takšnimi postopki se prepreči pregrevanje žita, ki ustvarja ugodne pogoje za razvoj plesni, nastajanje mikotoksinov in izleganje jajčec zajedavskih žuželk, lahko pa povzroči celo kaljenje žitnih zrn.
These treatments prevent overheating of the grain, something that creates ideal conditions for the growth of mould, the formation of mycotoxins and the hatching of the eggs of insect parasites and that can even cause the germination of caryopses.
Naravni kvas je pripravljen iz testene osnove, ki se po potrebi obnavlja.
The natural leaven is derived from a starter that is renewed as necessary.
Obnavljanje poteka tako, da se en del testene osnove zgnete z dvema deloma moke in enim delom vode, dokler po gnetenju ne dobimo količine testa, ki zadošča za štiri kose testa za vzhajanje.
This involves taking one part of starter and mixing it with two parts of flour and one part of water.
Od teh se en kos zopet uporabi kot osnova in se torej znova obnovi, preostali trije kosi pa se po najmanj petih urah zorenja zamesijo v testo, kjer delujejo kot naravni kvas.
After kneading, this produces four pieces of rising dough.
Vzročna povezanost geografskega območja s kakovostjo ali značilnostmi proizvoda (pri ZOP) oziroma z določeno kakovostjo, slovesom ali značilnostjo proizvoda (pri ZGO)
One of these will serve as a renovated starter and the other three are added to the bread mixture as a natural leaven after being left to ripen for at least five hours.
Posebnosti kruha „Pagnotta del Dittaino“, opisane v točki 5.2, v veliki meri določajo morfološke in pedoklimatske značilnosti proizvodnega območja iz točke 4.
Causal link between the geographical area and the quality or characteristics of the product (for PDO) or a specific quality, the reputation or other characteristic of the product (for PGI)
Te posebne značilnosti so nedvomno tesno povezane s trdo pšenico, ki je glavna in prevladujoča surovina v proizvodnem procesu ter ima zaradi pedoklimatskih značilnosti opredeljenega območja odlične kakovostne in zdravstvene lastnosti (brez mikotoksinov), ki dajejo kruhu z ZOP „Pagnotta del Dittaino“ edinstvene organoleptične značilnosti.
The special properties of ‘Pagnotta del Dittaino’ described in point 5.2 stem directly from the morphological characteristics, soil and climate of the production area referred to in point 4.
Kot kažejo zgodovinska pričevanja, se je na tem območju za pripravo kruha od nekdaj uporabljala trda pšenica, za razliko od drugih italijanskih pokrajin, kjer se je uporabljala in se še uporablja moka iz mehke pšenice.
Those properties are without any doubt due to and therefore closely linked to the durum wheat used as the main raw material in the production process, which, due to the soil and climate of the production area, has excellent quality and health characteristics (free from mycotoxins) and confers on ‘Pagnotta del Dittaino’ PDO its unique organoleptic properties.
Zaradi te posebnosti je mogoče izdelati kruh, ki en teden ohrani svoje poglavitne organoleptične značilnosti.
Durum wheat, as historical sources relate, was always used in the area for bread-making, unlike in other parts of Italy where common wheat flour was and continues to be used, giving a product that conserved its principal organoleptic properties for a week.
Ohranitev teh značilnosti ni zgolj posledica uporabe ponovno zmletega trdega pšeničnega zdroba, temveč tudi uporabe naravnega kvasa, imenovanega „criscenti“.
This was the result of the use not only of durum wheat flour but also of ‘criscenti’ (natural leaven).
Fermentacija kislega testa poteka na osnovi dinamičnega ravnovesja, ki se vzpostavi med mlečnimi bakterijami in kvasovkami.
The fermentation of the sourdough is based on a dynamic equilibrium between lactic bacteria and yeasts.
Najobičajnejše vrste teh bakterij so Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis (Lactobacillus brevis ssp. lindneri), Candida milleri in Saccharomyces exiguus.
The principal microbial species found are Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis (Lactobacillus brevis ssp. lindneri), Candida milleri and Saccharomyces exiguus.
Med številnimi pričevanji iz antičnih besedil se mnoga nanašajo na območje, kjer se prideluje trda pšenica, in so sčasoma postala zakladnica dediščine znanj in običajev, povezanih s pridelavo žit ter s samo peko kruha.
Much of the evidence provided in ancient texts was gathered in the durum-wheat production area and has come, over time, to constitute a store of knowledge and traditions relating to cereal production and, in particular, bread-making.
Pridelava trde pšenice v notranjosti Sicilije, na področju občin v pokrajinah Etna in Catania, je bistvenega pomena ne le zaradi obsežne površine, namenjene tej dejavnosti, temveč tudi zato, ker obsega zemljišča, na katerih je tradicionalna suha pridelava trde pšenice.
Durum-wheat production in the areas of the interior of Sicily, including municipalities in the Provinces of Enna and Catania, is an important activity, not only because of the size of the area devoted to it but also because it involves land traditionally used for the dry cultivation of durum wheat.
Prav v teh občinah je bila zaradi značilnosti prsti in podnebja trda pšenica nekoč edina kulturna rastlina, ki je lahko lokalnemu kmečkemu prebivalstvu zagotavljala delo in redne prihodke.
In those municipalities, because of both soil conditions and the climate, the only crop that has been able over the years to guarantee local farmers employment and a fair income is durum wheat.
Eno od pričevanj o velikem pomenu trde pšenice za način prehranjevanja prebivalcev Sicilije izhaja prav iz dela „De Naturalis Historia“ Plinija Starejšega.
Evidence of the important role played by durum wheat in the Sicilian diet is provided by Pliny the Elder in his ‘De Naturalis Historia’.
Medtem ko so v drugih italijanskih pokrajinah pridobivali moko iz želoda, kostanja ali drugih žit, kot sta ječmen in rž, so se na Siciliji kmetje učili izdelovati kruh iz pšenične moke.
While in other regions of Italy, flour was obtained from acorns, chestnuts or from other cereals, such as barley and rye, in Sicily farmers learned to make bread from wheat flour.
Kot trdi Sonnino, so sicilijanski kmetje kljub veliki revščini uspeli preživeti prav po zaslugi te veščine, saj so uživali kruh, pripravljen s pšenično moko.
According to Sonnino, people in the Sicilian countryside survived, despite serious shortages, by living on bread made from wheat flour.
Sklic na objavo specifikacije
Reference to publication of the specification
(člen 5(7) Uredbe (ES) št. 510/2006)
(Article 5(7) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006)
Celotno besedilo prečiščene različice specifikacije proizvoda je na voljo na spletni strani:
The full text of the product specification is available on the following website:
ali
or alternatively:
neposredno na domači strani ministrstva za kmetijsko, prehrambno in gozdarsko politiko (www.politicheagricole.it), kjer izberete „Qualità e sicurezza“ (v desnem zgornjem kotu zaslona) in nato „Disciplinari di Produzione all'esame dell'UE“.
by going direct to the home page of the Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policy (www.politicheagricole.it) and clicking on ‘Qualità e sicurezza’ (at the top right of the screen) and then on ‘Disciplinari di Produzione all'esame dell'UE’.
UL L 93, 31.3.2006, str.
OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12, replaced by Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p.
12, nadomeščena z Uredbo (EU) št. 1151/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. novembra 2012 o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in živil (UL L 343, 14.12.2012, str.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 614/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 614/2014
of 6 June 2014
z dne 6. junija 2014
amending Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 as regards the application of certain support measures in the wine sector
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 555/2008 glede uporabe nekaterih podpornih ukrepov v vinskem sektorju
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 [1], and in particular points (a), (b), (c), (e) and (f) of Article 54 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trgov kmetijskih proizvodov in razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 922/72, (EGS) št. 234/79, (ES) št. 1037/2001 in (ES) št. 1234/2007 [1] in zlasti točk (a), (b), (c), (e) in (f) člena 54 Uredbe,
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 has repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 [2] and contains, in Section 4 of Chapter II of Title I of Part II, rules on national support programmes in the wine sector.
Uredba (EU) št. 1308/2013 je razveljavila in nadomestila Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007 [2] ter v oddelku 4 poglavja II naslova I dela II vsebuje pravila o nacionalnih podpornih programih v vinskem sektorju.
While most of the rules laid down in that Section ensure the continuation of the rules applicable to the national support programmes in the wine sector under Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007, some new rules are also included.
Večina pravil iz navedenega oddelka zagotavlja nadaljevanje pravil, ki so se za nacionalne podporne programe v vinskem sektorju uporabljala v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007, dodana pa so bila tudi nekatera nova pravila.
Those rules introduce new elements, namely a sub-measure of the measure of promotion, concerning promotion of wine in Member States, a measure of innovation in the wine sector as well as an extension of the measure on restructuring and conversion of vineyards to cover replanting of vineyards following mandatory grubbing-up for health or phytosanitary reasons.
Ta pravila uvajajo nove elemente, in sicer podukrep ukrepa promocije, ki zadeva promocijo vina v državah članicah, ukrep inovativnosti v vinskem sektorju ter razširitev ukrepa prestrukturiranja in preusmeritve vinogradov, tako da zajema ponovno zasaditev vinogradov po obvezni izkrčitvi iz zdravstvenih ali fitosanitarnih razlogov.
Rules for the implementation of those elements should be laid down.
Treba bi bilo določiti pravila za izvajanje navedenih elementov.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 [3] lays down rules as regards national support programmes in the wine sector provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 555/2008 [3] določa pravila o nacionalnih podpornih programih v vinskem sektorju iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007.
In order to implement the new rules laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the appropriate provisions should be introduced in Regulation (EC) No 555/2008.
Zaradi izvajanja novih pravil, določenih v Uredbi (EU) št. 1308/2013, bi bilo treba Uredbo (ES) št. 555/2008 dopolniti z ustreznimi določbami.
Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 should allow Member States to modify their operational programmes and align them with the new elements introduced by Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
Člen 3(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 555/2008 bi moral državam članicam omogočati, da spremenijo svoje operativne programe in jih uskladijo z novimi elementi iz Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013.
For this purpose, Member States should be allowed to modify their operational programmes an additional time after 30 June 2014, taking into consideration the dates of adoption of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 612/2014 [4] and of this Regulation.
Za ta namen bi moralo biti državam članicam ob upoštevanju datumov sprejetja Delegirane uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 612/2014 [4] in te uredbe dovoljeno, da svoje operativne programe spremenijo tudi po 30. juniju 2014.
Rules should be laid down concerning the selection of information projects and regarding the preference to be granted, when selecting the projects on the internal market.
Treba bi bilo določiti pravila glede izbora informacijskih projektov in prednosti pri izbiri projektov na notranjem trgu.
The selection procedure for promotion of wines in the Member States should be coherent with the procedure for promotion of wines on third-country markets as laid down in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008, but it should also take into account the particular objectives and geographical scope of this sub-measure.
Izbirni postopek za promocijo vin v državah članicah bi moral biti usklajen s postopkom za promocijo vin na trgih tretjih držav v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 555/2008, hkrati pa bi moral upoštevati posebne cilje in geografsko razsežnost navedenega podukrepa.
Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 provides for the financial management of the investments measure.
Člen 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 555/2008 ureja finančno poslovanje v zvezi z naložbenim ukrepom.
Those rules should also apply to the measure of innovation in the wine sector.
Ta pravila bi se morala uporabljati tudi za ukrep inovativnosti v vinskem sektorju.
In particular, to allow for a better use of the funds, it should be possible to pay the support after the execution of only certain of the operations foreseen in the application concerned while making sure that all the remaining operations will be completed.
Zaradi boljše uporabe sredstev bi bilo treba zlasti omogočiti, da se podpora plača po izvedbi samo nekaterih ukrepov, predvidenih v zadevni vlogi, pri čemer bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da bodo dokončani tudi preostali ukrepi.
Moreover, it is appropriate to fix the maximum ceiling for advance payments similar to the one established for investments.
Poleg tega bi bilo primerno za predplačila določiti podobno najvišjo zgornjo mejo, kot je določena za naložbe.
Article 37b of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 requests that the beneficiaries provide information related to the advances granted in accordance with certain provisions of that Regulation.
Člen 37b Uredbe (ES) št. 555/2008 določa, da morajo upravičenci posredovati informacije glede predplačil, odobrenih v skladu z nekaterimi določbami navedene uredbe.
This obligation should also apply to the measure of innovation introduced by Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.
To obveznost bi bilo treba uporabljati tudi za ukrep inovativnosti, ki ga je uvedla Uredba (EU) št. 1308/2013.
Annexes I to VIII, Annex VIIIa and VIIIc to Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 set out the forms to be filled in by the Member States concerning the national support programmes, in particular, for the purposes of the submission of the support programmes, their revision and the corresponding financial planning as well as for the submission of reports and evaluations.
Priloge I do VIII ter prilogi VIIIa in VIIIc Uredbe (ES) št. 555/2008 vsebujejo obrazce, ki jih države članice izpolnijo v zvezi z nacionalnimi podpornimi programi, zlasti za namene predložitve podpornih programov, njihove revizije in ustreznega finančnega načrta ter predložitve poročil in ocen.
Those Annexes should be amended in order to reflect the introduction, in Section 4 of Chapter II of Title I of Part II of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, of new provisions concerning the content, evaluation, cost and control.
Navedene priloge bi bilo treba spremeniti, da bodo odražale nove določbe glede vsebine, ocenjevanja, stroškov in nadzora iz oddelka 4 poglavja II naslova I dela II Uredbe (EU) št. 1308/2013.
Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 should be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 555/2008 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 555/2008
Sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 555/2008
Modifications in respect of support programmes shall not be submitted more than twice per financial year, by 1 March and 30 June, except in cases of emergency measures due to natural disasters.
Razen pri nujnih ukrepih zaradi naravnih nesreč se spremembe podpornih programov ne predložijo več kot dvakrat v proračunskem letu, in sicer do 1. marca in do 30. junija.
The modified programmes shall be submitted to the Commission with, where appropriate:
Spremenjeni programi se Komisiji po potrebi predložijo skupaj:
updated versions of the support programme in the form set out in Annex I and of the financial table in the form set out in Annex IV;
s posodobljenimi različicami podpornega programa na obrazcu iz Priloge I in finančne preglednice na obrazcu iz Priloge IV;
the reasons for the proposed changes.
z razlogi za predlagane spremembe.
By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the deadlines set out in that subparagraph do not apply in 2014 where the modifications of the programme follow the new rules introduced by Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council.
Z odstopanjem od prvega pododstavka se roka iz navedenega pododstavka ne uporabljata za leto 2014, v katerem so spremembe programov posledica novih pravil, uvedenih z Uredbo (EU) št. 1308/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
in subsection 2 of Section 1 of Chapter II of Title II the following Article is added:
v pododdelku 2 oddelka 1 poglavja II naslova II se doda naslednji člen:
‘Article 5fa
„Člen 5fa
Member States shall lay down the application procedure, which shall in particular provide rules on:
Države članice določijo postopek prijave, s katerim se zlasti zagotovijo pravila za:
verification of compliance with the requirements and criteria set out in Articles 5b and 5c;
preverjanje izpolnjevanja zahtev in meril iz členov 5b in 5c;
deadlines for the presentation of application and for the examination of the suitability of each proposed action;
roke za predložitev vlog in preverjanje ustreznosti vsakega predlaganega ukrepa;
conclusion of contracts including possible standard forms, provision of securities and arrangements for the payment of advances;
ureditev sklepanja pogodb, vključno z mogočimi standardnimi obrazci, položitvijo varščine in nakazili predplačil;
evaluating any given supported action including the appropriate indicators.
oceno katerega koli podpornega ukrepa, vključno z ustreznimi kazalniki.
Member States shall select the application in particular on the basis of the following criteria:
Države članice izberejo vlogo zlasti na podlagi naslednjih meril:
their likely impact and success in raising consumers awareness about the Union system of protected designation of origin and protected geographical indications or about responsible consumption of wine and the risk associated with alcohol consumption;
njihovega verjetnega vpliva in uspešnosti pri povečanju ozaveščenosti potrošnikov o sistemu Unije za zaščitene označbe porekla in zaščitene geografske označbe ali o odgovornem uživanju vina ter tveganjih, povezanih z uživanjem alkohola;
assurances that any operator involved is effective and has access to the required technical capacity and that the cost of the measure which he plans to carry out himself is not in excess of the normal market rates.
zagotovil, da je vsak vključeni subjekt uspešen in ima dostop do zahtevanih tehničnih zmogljivosti ter da stroški ukrepa, ki ga namerava sam izvesti, ne presegajo običajnih tržnih cen.
Preference shall be given to operations:
Prednost imajo ukrepi:
concerning several Member States;
ki zadevajo več držav članic;
concerning several administrative or wine regions;
ki zadevajo več upravnih ali vinorodnih regij;
concerning several protected designations of origin or protected geographical indications.
ki zadevajo več zaščitenih označb porekla ali zaščitenih geografskih označb.
They shall undertake to contribute to the financing and agree on administrative collaboration procedures to facilitate the monitoring, implementation and checking of the joint promotion operation.
Zavežejo se, da bodo prispevale k njegovemu financiranju in vzpostavile medsebojno upravno sodelovanje, da se olajšajo spremljanje, izvajanje in preverjanje skupnega promocijskega ukrepa.
Where Member States grant national aids for promotion, they shall communicate them in the relevant part of Annexes I, V, VII, VIII and VIIIc to this Regulation.’;
Če države članice dodelijo nacionalne pomoči za promocijo, to sporočijo v ustreznem delu prilog I, V, VII, VIII in VIIIc k tej uredbi.“;
in Section 6a, the following Article is added:
v oddelku 6a se doda naslednji člen:
‘Article 20c
„Člen 20c
Where support is normally payable only after implementation of all the operations, by way of derogation from the first subparagraph, support shall be paid for single operations implemented if the remaining operations could not be carried out due to force majeure or exceptional circumstances as referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council.If checks show that an overall operation covered by the support application has not been fully implemented for reasons other than force majeure or exceptional circumstances as referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 and where support has been paid after single operations which are part of the overall operation covered by the support application, Member States shall decide to recover the aid paid.
Kadar se podpora običajno lahko izplača šele po izvedbi vseh ukrepov, se z odstopanjem od prvega pododstavka podpora izplača za posamezne izvedene ukrepe, če preostalih ukrepov ni bilo mogoče izvesti zaradi višje sile ali izjemnih okoliščin, kot je navedeno v členu 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.Če se s preverjanjem pokaže, da celovit ukrep iz vloge za podporo ni bil v celoti izveden iz razlogov, ki niso višja sila ali izjemne okoliščine, kot je navedeno v členu 2 Uredbe (EU) št. 1306/2013, in če je bila podpora izplačana po izvedbi posameznih ukrepov, ki so del celovitega ukrepa iz vloge za podporo, se države članice odločijo izterjati plačano pomoč.
Beneficiaries of support for innovation may request the payment of an advance from the competent paying agencies if this option is included in the national support programme.
Upravičenci do podpore za inovativnost lahko zaprosijo pristojne plačilne agencije, naj jim izplačajo predplačilo, če je ta možnost vključena v nacionalni podporni program.
The amount of the advances shall not exceed 20 % of the public aid related to the investment in innovation, and its payment shall be subject to the establishment of a bank guarantee or an equivalent guarantee corresponding to 110 % of the amount of the advance.
Znesek predplačil ne presega 20 % državne pomoči za naložbo v inovativnost, pogoj za izplačilo pa je odprtje bančne garancije ali enakovrednega jamstva v višini 110 % zneska predplačila.
However, in the case of investments in innovation for which the individual decision to grant support is taken in the financial years 2014 or 2015, the amount of the advances may be increased up to 50 % of the public aid related to that investment.
Vendar se v primeru naložb v inovativnost, za katere se v proračunskih letih 2014 ali 2015 sprejme individualno odločitev o dodelitvi podpore, višina predplačil lahko poviša za do 50 % državne pomoči, povezane z navedeno naložbo.
For the purposes of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2012 the obligation shall be to spend the total amount advanced in the implementation of the operation concerned two years after its payment.
Za namene Izvedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) št. 282/2012 je treba celotni znesek predplačila porabiti za izvajanje zadevnega ukrepa v dveh letih po izplačilu.
The guarantee shall be released when the competent paying agency establishes that the amount of actual expenditure corresponding to the public aid related to the innovation exceeds the amount of the advance.
Garancija se sprosti, ko pristojna plačilna agencija ugotovi, da je znesek dejanskih izdatkov, ki ustrezajo državni pomoči, povezani z inovacijo, presegel znesek predplačila.
Article 37b is amended as follows:
člen 37b se spremeni:
Where advances are granted in accordance with Articles 5(7), 5e, 9(2), 19(2), 20a(4) and 24(3), beneficiaries are requested to provide for each project annually to the paying agencies the following information:
Kadar se predplačila odobrijo v skladu s členi 5(7), 5e, 9(2), 19(2), 20a(4) in 24(3), se od upravičencev zahteva, da plačilnim agencijam vsako leto za vsak projekt zagotovijo naslednje informacije: