natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the experience acquired, there is also a need to adjust the rules governing dynamic purchasing systems to enable contracting entities to take full advantage of the possibilities afforded by that instrument.
Pridobljene izkušnje so pokazale, da je treba prilagoditi tudi pravila o dinamičnih nabavnih sistemih, s čimer se naročnikom omogoči, da v celoti izkoristijo možnosti, ki jih zagotavlja ta instrument.
The systems need to be simplified, in particular they should be operated in the form of a restricted procedure, hence eliminating the need for indicative tenders, which have been identified as one of the major burdens associated with dynamic purchasing systems.
Sisteme je treba poenostaviti, zlasti pa bi jih bilo treba upravljati v obliki omejenega postopka, s čimer bi odpravili potrebo po okvirnih ponudbah, ki so se izkazale za eno večjih bremen, povezanih z dinamičnimi nabavnimi sistemi.
Thus any economic operator who submits a request to participate and meets the selection criteria should be allowed to take part in procurement procedures carried out through the dynamic purchasing system over its period of validity.
Zato bi bilo treba vsakemu gospodarskemu subjektu, ki predloži prijavo za sodelovanje in izpolnjuje pogoje za sodelovanje, omogočiti sodelovanje v postopkih naročanja, ki se izvajajo v okviru dinamičnega nabavnega sistema v času njegove veljavnosti.
This purchasing technique allows the contracting entity to have a particularly broad range of tenders and hence to ensure optimum use of funds through broad competition in respect of commonly used or off-the-shelf products, works or services which are generally available on the market.
Ta nabavna tehnika naročniku omogoča, da ima zelo širok razpon ponudb in tako z močno konkurenco, kar zadeva običajno ali standardno blago, gradnje ali storitve, ki so na trgu splošno dostopni, zagotovi najbolj učinkovito porabo javnih sredstev.
The examination of those requests to participate should normally be performed within a maximum of 10 working days, given that the evaluation of the selection criteria will take place on the basis of the requirements for documentation set out by the contracting entities, where applicable in accordance with the simplified provisions of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Te prijave za sodelovanje bi bilo treba običajno preučiti v največ 10 delovnih dneh, saj naj bi ocenjevanje pogojev za sodelovanje potekalo na podlagi zahtev za dokumentacijo, ki jih določijo naročniki, po potrebi v skladu s poenostavljenimi določbami Direktive 2014/24/EU.
However, when a dynamic purchasing system is first set up, contracting entities might, in response to the first publication of the contract notice or the invitation to confirm interest, be faced with such a large number of requests for participation that they would need more time to examine the requests.
Vendar so lahko naročniki ob prvi vzpostavitvi dinamičnega nabavnega sistema kot odziv na prvo objavo obvestila o javnem naročilu ali povabila k potrditvi interesa soočeni s tako velikim številom prijav za sodelovanje, da utegnejo za njihovo preučitev potrebovati več časa.
That should be admissible, provided that no specific procurement is launched before all the requests have been examined.
To bi moralo biti dopustno pod pogojem, da se nobeno posamezno javno naročilo ne začne, dokler niso pregledane vse prijave.
Contracting entities should be free to organise the way in which they intend to examine the requests for participation, for instance by deciding to conduct such examinations only once a week, provided the deadlines for the examination of each request of admission are observed.
Naročnikom bi morali dovoliti, da sami določijo, na kakšen način nameravajo preučiti prijave za sodelovanje, lahko se na primer odločijo, da bodo prijave preučevali le enkrat tedensko, pod pogojem, da upoštevajo roke za preučitev vsake prijave za sodelovanje.
Contracting entities using the exclusion or selection criteria provided for under Directive 2014/24/EU in the context of a dynamic purchasing system, should apply the relevant provisions of that Directive in the same way as contracting authorities operating a dynamic purchasing system pursuant to Directive 2014/24/EU.
Naročniki, ki v okviru dinamičnega nabavnega sistema uporabijo pogoje za izključitev ali sodelovanje iz Direktive 2014/24/EU, bi ustrezne določbe navedene direktive morali uporabiti enako kot javni naročniki, ki upravljajo dinamični nabavni sistem na podlagi Direktive 2014/24/EU.
In order to further the possibilities of SMEs to participate in a large-scale dynamic purchasing system, for instance one that is operated by a central purchasing body, the contracting authority or entity concerned should be able to articulate the system in objectively defined categories of products, works or services.
Da bi izboljšali možnosti MSP za sodelovanje v velikem dinamičnem nabavnem sistemu, na primer takem, ki ga upravlja osrednji nabavni organ, bi moral imeti zadevni javni naročnik ali naročnik možnost, da sistem razdeli na objektivno opredeljene kategorije blaga, gradenj ali storitev.
Such categories should be defined by reference to objective factors which might for instance include the maximum allowable size of specific contracts to be awarded within the category concerned or a specific geographic area in which subsequent specific contracts are to be performed.
Take kategorije bi morale biti opredeljene glede na objektivne dejavnike, ki lahko vključujejo na primer največji dovoljeni obseg posameznih naročil, ki se lahko oddajo v zadevni kategoriji, ali določeno geografsko območje, na katerem se bodo izvedla posamezna naknadna naročila.
Where a dynamic purchasing system is divided into categories, the contracting authority or entity should apply selection criteria that are proportionate to the characteristics of the category concerned.
Če je dinamični nabavni sistem razdeljen v kategorije, bi moral javni naročnik ali naročnik uporabljati pogoje za sodelovanje, ki so sorazmerni z značilnostmi zadevne kategorije.
It should be clarified that electronic auctions are typically not suitable for certain works contracts and certain service contracts having as their subject-matter intellectual performances, such as the design of works, because only the elements suitable for automatic evaluation by electronic means, without any intervention or appreciation by the contracting entity, namely elements which are quantifiable so that they can be expressed in figures or percentages, may be the object of electronic auctions.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da elektronske dražbe običajno niso ustrezne za nekatera javna naročila gradenj in nekatera javna naročila storitev, katerih predmet je intelektualna izvedba, na primer projektiranje gradenj, saj so predmet elektronskih dražb lahko le elementi, ustrezni za avtomatsko ocenjevanje z elektronskimi sredstvi, brez kakršnega koli posredovanja ali presojanja naročnika, torej elementi, ki so količinsko opredeljivi, da se lahko izrazijo v številkah ali odstotkih.
It is also appropriate to recall that while contracting entities remain free to apply selection criteria enabling them to reduce the number of candidates or tenderers as long as the auction has not yet started, no further reduction of the number of tenderers participating in the electronic auction should be allowed after the auction has started.
Obenem je treba opozoriti, da imajo naročniki do začetka elektronske dražbe še vedno možnost uporabiti pogoje za sodelovanje, da bi zmanjšali število kandidatov ali ponudnikov, vendar pa po njenem začetku ne bi smelo biti dovoljeno nobeno nadaljnje zmanjšanje števila ponudnikov, ki v njej sodelujejo.
Contracting entities should be able to require electronic catalogues in all available procedures where the use of electronic means of communication is required.
Naročniki bi morali imeti možnost, da zahtevajo elektronske kataloge v vseh razpoložljivih postopkih, pri katerih se zahteva uporaba elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev.
Electronic catalogues help to increase competition and streamline public purchasing, particularly in terms of savings in time and money.
Elektronski katalogi povečujejo konkurenco in racionalizirajo javno naročanje, zlasti v smislu prihrankov časa in finančnih sredstev.
Certain rules should however be laid down to ensure that such use complies with this Directive with and the principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency.
Vendar bi bilo treba določiti nekatera pravila, s katerimi bi zagotovili, da se pri tovrstni uporabi upošteva ta direktiva ter načela enake obravnave, nediskriminacije in transparentnosti.
Economic operators should still have to adapt their general catalogues in view of the specific procurement procedure.
Gospodarski subjekti bi splošne kataloge vseeno morali prilagoditi glede na posamezen postopek javnega naročanja.
Such adaptation ensures that the catalogue that is transmitted in response to a given procurement procedure contains only products, works or services that the economic operators estimated — after an active examination — correspond to the requirements of the contracting entity.
Taka prilagoditev zagotavlja, da katalog, poslan v odziv na določen postopek javnega naročanja, vsebuje le blago, gradnje ali storitve, za katere je gospodarski subjekt po tehtnem premisleku ocenil, da ustrezajo zahtevam naročnika.
In so doing, economic operators should be allowed to copy information contained in their general catalogue, but they should not be allowed to submit the general catalogue as such.
Pri tem bi morali gospodarskim subjektom dovoliti, da kopirajo informacije iz svojih splošnih katalogov, ne pa tudi, da predložijo cel splošni katalog.
Furthermore, where sufficient guarantees are offered in respect of ensuring traceability, equal treatment and predictability, contracting entities should be allowed to generate tenders in relation to specific purchases on the basis of previously transmitted electronic catalogues, in particular where competition has been reopened under a framework agreement or where a dynamic purchasing system is being used.
Če so dana zadostna jamstva za zagotavljanje sledljivosti, enake obravnave in predvidljivosti, bi bilo treba naročnikom poleg tega omogočiti pripravo ponudb za določena naročila na podlagi predhodno poslanih elektronskih katalogov, zlasti če je bila konkurenca ponovno odprta na podlagi okvirnega sporazuma ali če se uporablja dinamični nabavni sistem.
Where tenders have been generated by the contracting entity, the economic operator concerned should be given the possibility to verify that the tender thus constituted by the contracting entity does not contain any material errors.
Če je ponudbe pripravil naročnik, bi moral imeti zadevni gospodarski subjekt možnost potrditi, da ponudba, ki jo je naročnik tako zasnoval, nima vsebinskih napak.
Where material errors are present, the economic operator should not be bound by the tender generated by the contracting entity unless the error is corrected.
Če so vsebinske napake prisotne, ponudba, ki jo je zasnoval naročnik, za gospodarski subjekt ne bi smela biti zavezujoča, razen če se napaka popravi.
In line with the requirements of the rules for electronic means of communication, contracting entities should avoid unjustified obstacles to economic operators’ access to procurement procedures in which tenders are to be presented in the form of electronic catalogues and which guarantee compliance with the general principles of non-discrimination and equal treatment.
Naročniki bi morali v skladu z zahtevami pravil za elektronska komunikacijska sredstva preprečiti neutemeljene ovire za dostop gospodarskih subjektov do postopkov javnega naročanja, v katerih je treba ponudbe oddati v predložiti elektronskih katalogov in ki zagotavljajo upoštevanje splošnih načel nediskriminacije in enake obravnave.
Central purchasing bodies are responsible for making acquisitions, managing dynamic purchasing systems or awarding contracts/framework agreements for other contracting authorities or contracting entities, with or without remuneration.
Osrednji nabavni organi so proti plačilu ali brezplačno odgovorni za pridobitve, upravljanje dinamičnih nabavnih sistemov ali oddajo javnih naročil/sklepanje okvirnih sporazumov za druge javne naročnike ali naročnike.
The contracting entities for whom a framework agreement is concluded should be able to use it for individual or repetitive purchases.
Naročnikom, za katere je sklenjen okvirni sporazum, bi moralo biti omogočeno, da ga uporabljajo za enkratna ali večkratna javna naročila.
Provision should therefore be made for a Union definition of central purchasing bodies dedicated to contracting entities and it should be clarified that central purchasing bodies operate in two different manners.
Zato bi bilo treba na ravni Unije opredeliti osrednje nabavne organe, ki bi jih lahko uporabljali naročniki, treba pa bi bilo tudi pojasniti, da tovrstni organi delujejo na dva različna načina.
Firstly, they should be able to act as wholesalers by buying, stocking and reselling or, secondly, they should be able to act as intermediaries by awarding contracts, operating dynamic purchasing systems or concluding framework agreements to be used by contracting entities.
In sicer bi ti organi morali biti sposobni, da z nakupovanjem, skladiščenjem in ponovno prodajo delujejo kot veletrgovci, ali pa da z oddajanjem javnih naročil, upravljanjem dinamičnih nabavnih sistemov ali sklepanjem okvirnih sporazumov, ki jih uporabljajo naročniki, delujejo kot posredniki.
Such an intermediary role might in some cases be carried out by conducting the relevant award procedures autonomously, without detailed instructions from the contracting entities concerned; in other cases, by conducting the relevant award procedures under the instructions of the contracting entities concerned, on their behalf and for their account.
Taka posredniška vloga se lahko v nekaterih primerih opravlja tako, da se ustrezni postopki oddaje javnih naročil izvedejo samostojno, brez podrobnih navodil zadevnih naročnikov, v drugih primerih pa tako, da se ustrezni postopki oddaje izvedejo v skladu z navodili zadevnih naročnikov, v njihovem imenu in za njihov račun.
Furthermore, rules should be laid down for allocating responsibility for the observance of the obligations pursuant to this Directive, also in the case of remedies, as between the central purchasing body and the contracting entities procuring from or through it.
Nadalje bi bilo treba določiti pravila o razdelitvi odgovornosti za upoštevanje obveznosti iz te direktive, tudi glede pravnih sredstev, med osrednji nabavni organ in naročnike, ki naročajo pri osrednjem nabavnem organu ali prek njega.
Where the central purchasing body has sole responsibility for the conduct of the procurement procedures, it should also be solely and directly responsible for the legality of the procedures.
Kadar je osrednji nabavni organ izključno odgovoren za vodenje postopkov javnega naročanja, bi moral biti tudi izključno in neposredno odgovoren za njihovo zakonitost.
Where a contracting entity conducts certain parts of the procedure, for instance the reopening of competition under a framework agreement or the award of individual contracts based on a dynamic purchasing system, it should continue to be responsible for the stages it conducts.
Če naročnik vodi nekatere dele postopka, na primer ponovno odpiranje konkurence na podlagi okvirnega sporazuma ali oddajo posameznih naročil na podlagi dinamičnega nabavnega sistema, bi moral biti še naprej odgovoren za faze, ki jih vodi.
Contracting entities should be allowed to award a service contract for the provision of centralised purchasing activities to a central purchasing body without applying the procedures provided for in this Directive.
Naročnikom bi morali dovoliti, da javno naročilo storitev za zagotavljanje centraliziranih nabavnih dejavnosti osrednjemu nabavnemu organu oddajo brez uporabe postopkov javnega naročanja iz te direktive.
It should also be permitted for such service contracts to include the provision of ancillary purchasing activities.
Prav tako bi morali dovoliti, da taka javna naročila storitev zajemajo zagotavljanje pomožnih nabavnih dejavnosti.
Such service contracts for the provision of ancillary purchasing activities should, when performed otherwise than by a central purchasing body in connection with its provision of central purchasing activities to the contracting entity concerned, be awarded in accordance with this Directive.
Javna naročila storitev za zagotavljanje pomožnih nabavnih dejavnosti bi se morala oddati v skladu s to direktivo, kadar jih osrednji nabavni organ ne izvaja v povezavi z zagotavljanjem centraliziranih nabavnih dejavnosti za zadevnega naročnika.
It should also be recalled that this Directive should not apply where centralised or ancillary purchasing activities are provided other than through a contract for pecuniary interest which constitutes procurement within the meaning of this Directive.
Prav tako bi bilo treba opozoriti, da se ta direktiva ne bi smela uporabljati, kadar se centralizirane ali pomožne nabavne dejavnosti ne zagotavljajo z odplačno pogodbo, ki predstavlja javno naročilo v smislu te direktive.
Strengthening the provisions concerning central purchasing bodies should in no way prevent the current practices of occasional joint procurement, i.e. less institutionalised and systematic common purchasing or the established practice of having recourse to service providers that prepare and manage procurement procedures on behalf and for the account of a contracting entity and under its instructions.
Krepitev določb glede osrednjih nabavnih organov nikakor ne bi smela preprečiti sedanjih praks občasnega skupnega javnega naročanja, to je manj institucionaliziranega in sistematičnega skupnega javnega naročanja, ali ustaljene prakse uporabe ponudnikov storitev, ki pripravljajo in vodijo postopke naročanja v imenu in za račun naročnika ter v skladu z njegovimi navodili.
On the contrary, certain features of joint procurement should be clarified because of the important role joint procurement may play, not least in connection with innovative projects.
Nasprotno pa bi morali pojasniti nekatere značilnosti skupnega javnega naročanja, saj bi slednje lahko imelo pomembno vlogo, ne nazadnje v zvezi z inovativnimi projekti.
Joint procurement can take many different forms, ranging from coordinated procurement through the preparation of common technical specifications for works, supplies or services that will be procured by a number of contracting entities, each conducting a separate procurement procedure, to situations where the contracting entities concerned jointly conduct one procurement procedure either by acting together or by entrusting one contracting entities with the management of the procurement procedure on behalf of all contracting entities.
Skupno javno naročanje ima lahko več različnih oblik: od usklajenega javnega naročanja s pripravo skupnih tehničnih specifikacij za gradnje, blago ali storitve, ki jih bo naročilo več naročnikov, od katerih bo vsak izvedel ločen postopek javnega naročanja, do primerov, pri katerih zadevni naročniki skupaj izvedejo en postopek javnega naročanja, pri čemer bodisi medsebojno sodelujejo bodisi enega naročnika pooblastijo za vodenje postopka javnega naročanja v imenu vseh naročnikov.
Where several contracting entities are jointly conducting a procurement procedure, they should be jointly responsible for fulfilling their obligations under this Directive.
Če več naročnikov skupaj izvaja postopek javnega naročanja, bi morali biti skupno odgovorni za izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti po tej direktivi.
However, where only parts of the procurement procedure are jointly conducted by the contracting entities, joint responsibility should apply only to those parts of the procedure that have been carried out together.
Kadar naročniki skupaj izvajajo le dele postopka javnega naročanja, pa bi morala skupna odgovornost veljati le za tiste dele postopka, ki se izvajajo skupaj.
Each contracting entity should be solely responsible in respect of procedures or parts of procedures it conducts on its own, such as the awarding of a contract, the conclusion of a framework agreement, the operation of a dynamic purchasing system or the reopening of competition under a framework agreement.
Vsak naročnik bi moral biti izključno odgovoren za postopke ali dele postopkov, ki jih izvaja sam, na primer oddajo javnega naročila, sklenitev okvirnega sporazuma, upravljanje dinamičnega nabavnega sistema ali ponovno odprtje konkurence na podlagi okvirnega sporazuma.
Electronic means of communication are particularly well suited to supporting centralised purchasing practices and tools because of the possibility they offer to re-use and automatically process data and to minimise information and transaction costs.
Elektronska komunikacijska sredstva so še zlasti ustrezna za podporo centraliziranih nabavnih praks in orodij, saj nudijo možnost ponovne uporabe in avtomatske obdelave podatkov ter znižanja informacijskih in transakcijskih stroškov.
The use of such electronic means of communication should therefore, as a first step, be rendered compulsory for central purchasing bodies, while also facilitating converging practices across the Union.
Najprej bi bilo torej treba obvezno uporabo takih elektronskih komunikacijskih sredstev naložiti osrednjim nabavnim organom, hkrati pa spodbujati usklajevanje praks po vsej Uniji.
Joint awarding of contracts by contracting entities from different Member States currently encounters specific legal difficulties concerning conflicts of national laws.
V zvezi s skupnim oddajanjem javnih naročil s strani naročnikov iz različnih držav članic se trenutno pojavljajo specifični pravni problemi v zvezi s kolizijo nacionalnih zakonodaj.
Despite the fact that Directive 2004/17/EC implicitly allowed for cross-border joint public procurement, contracting entities are still facing considerable legal and practical difficulties in purchasing from central purchasing bodies in other Member States or jointly awarding contracts.
Kljub temu, da Direktiva 2004/17/ES implicitno dovoljuje skupno čezmejno javno naročanje, pa se naročniki še vedno soočajo z znatnimi pravnimi in praktičnimi problemi pri javnem naročanju pri osrednjih nabavnih organih v drugih državah članicah ali pri skupnem oddajanju javnih naročil.
In order to allow contracting entities to derive maximum benefit from the potential of the internal market in terms of economies of scale and risk-benefit sharing, not least for innovative projects involving a greater amount of risk than reasonably bearable by a single contracting entity, those difficulties should be remedied.
Te probleme bi bilo treba odpraviti, da bi naročnikom omogočili, da kar najbolj izkoristijo potencial notranjega trga v smislu ekonomije obsega ter delitve tveganja in koristi, ne nazadnje pri inovativnih projektih z večjo stopnjo tveganja, kot jo lahko razumno prenese en sam naročnik.
Therefore new rules on cross-border joint procurement should be established in order to facilitate cooperation between contracting entities and enhancing the benefits of the internal market by creating cross-border business opportunities for suppliers and service providers.
Zato bi bilo treba oblikovati nova pravila o skupnem čezmejnem javnem naročanju, s katerimi bi olajšali sodelovanje med naročniki ter z ustvarjanjem čezmejnih poslovnih priložnosti za dobavitelje in ponudnike storitev povečali koristi notranjega trga.
Those rules should determine the conditions for cross-border utilisation of central purchasing bodies and designate the applicable public procurement legislation, including the applicable legislation on remedies, in cases of cross-border joint procedures, complementing the conflict of law rules of Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council [21].
S temi pravili bi bilo treba določiti pogoje za čezmejno uporabo osrednjih nabavnih organov in opredeliti veljavno zakonodajo o javnem naročanju, vključno z veljavno zakonodajo o pravnih sredstvih, za primere čezmejnih skupnih postopkov, ki bi dopolnjevala kolizijska pravila iz Uredbe (ES) št. 593/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [21].