natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A late reply to the Registry’s letter of notice to attend is likely to jeopardise the proper organisation of the hearing, both from the point of view of the speaking time allocated by the Court to the party concerned and with regard to the constraints on the operation of the interpretation service.
Zapoznel odgovor na vabilo sodnega tajništva lahko ogrozi nemoten potek obravnave glede časa za podajanje ustnih navedb, ki ga Sodišče odobri zadevni stranki, in glede zahtev, vezanih na delovanje službe za tolmačenje.
On account both of the sometimes difficult traffic conditions in Luxembourg and of the security measures applicable to access to the Court buildings, it is advisable to take the steps necessary to be present in the room where the hearing will take place on the day of the hearing well before it is due to start.
Zaradi razmer na cestah v Luxembourgu, ki so včasih težavne, in zaradi varnostnih ukrepov, ki veljajo za dostop do zgradb Sodišča, je priporočljivo, da se na dan obravnave navzočnost v dvorani, v kateri bo obravnava potekala, zagotovi pred uro, določeno za začetek te obravnave.
Before the hearing begins, the members of the formation of the Court usually hold a short meeting with the representatives of the parties or interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute about the organisation of the hearing.
V navadi je namreč, da so pred začetkom obravnave zastopniki strank ali zainteresiranih subjektov iz člena 23 Statuta povabljeni na kratek sestanek s člani sestave, ki je namenjen pripravi obravnave.
At that meeting the Judge-Rapporteur and the Advocate General may invite those representatives to provide, at the hearing, further information on certain questions or to develop one or more specific aspects of the case at issue.
Sodnik poročevalec in generalni pravobranilec lahko ob tej priložnosti zgoraj navedene zastopnike pozoveta, naj med obravnavo dodatno pojasnijo nekatera vprašanja ali temeljiteje predstavijo posamezni vidik obravnavane zadeve.
While the procedure at a hearing before the Court may vary depending on the circumstances of each case, in general it consists of three separate parts: the oral submissions proper, questions from the members of the Court and replies.
Čeprav se lahko potek obravnave pred Sodiščem razlikuje glede na okoliščine posamezne zadeve, praviloma zajema tri ločene dele: podajanje ustnih navedb, vprašanja članov Sodišča in replike.
Subject to any special circumstances, the hearing usually starts with the oral submissions of the parties or the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute.
Razen v posebnih okoliščinah se obravnava običajno začne s podajanjem ustnih navedb strank ali zainteresiranih subjektov iz člena 23 Statuta.
The aim of those submissions is, firstly, to respond to any requests to concentrate on specified issues in the submissions and to answer the questions that the Court might have put to the parties or interested persons before the hearing, under Articles 61 or 62 of the Rules of Procedure, and, if applicable, then to draw attention to the points which the person presenting oral argument considers to be particularly important for the Court’s decision, in particular, in preliminary ruling proceedings, having regard to the written observations submitted by the other participants in the proceedings.
Namen teh ustnih navedb je najprej slediti morebitnemu pozivu, naj bodo ustne navedbe osredotočene na nekatere točke, in odgovoriti na vprašanja, ki jih Sodišče strankam ali zainteresiranim subjektom lahko postavi pred obravnavo na podlagi členov 61 ali 62 Poslovnika, ter po potrebi v nadaljevanju poudariti točke, ki jih oseba, ki podaja navedbe, šteje za posebej pomembne za odločitev Sodišča, v postopku predhodnega odločanja zlasti glede pisnih stališč, ki so jih predložili drugi udeleženci postopka.
In the light of the knowledge which the Court already has of the case following the written part of the procedure, it is not necessary, at the hearing, to recall the content of the written pleadings or observations lodged or, in particular, the factual or legal background to the case.
Ker ob koncu pisnega dela postopka Sodišče zadevo že pozna, na obravnavi ni treba ponovno navajati vsebine predloženih vlog ali pisnih stališč, še zlasti ne dejanskega in pravnega okvira zadeve.
Only the decisive points for the purposes of the Court’s decision must be brought to its attention.
Sodišče je treba seznaniti le z vidiki, ki so odločilni za njegovo odločitev.
It must none the less be stated that where, before the hearing, the Court has requested the parties or the abovementioned interested persons to concentrate in their submissions on a question or a particular aspect of the case, in general only that question or that aspect should be addressed during those submissions.
Opozoriti pa je treba, da če je Sodišče pred obravnavo zgoraj navedene stranke ali zainteresirane subjekte pozvalo, naj svoje navedbe osredotočijo na določeno vprašanje ali vidik zadeve, naj bi se načeloma med tem podajanjem navedb obravnavalo samo to vprašanje ali vidik.
As far as possible, participants in the hearing who are advocating the same line of argument or adopting the same position must also liaise before the hearing to avoid repeating arguments which have already been submitted.
Poleg tega se morajo udeleženci obravnave, ki zagovarjajo enako tezo ali so zavzeli enako stališče, če je le mogoče, pred obravnavo posvetovati, da ne bi vnovič navajali trditev, ki so že bile podane.
The speaking time is fixed by the President of the formation of the Court, after consulting the Judge-Rapporteur and, if applicable, the Advocate General responsible for the case.
Čas za podajanje ustnih navedb določi predsednik sestave po posvetovanju s sodnikom poročevalcem in po potrebi z generalnim pravobranilcem, ki je zadolžen za zadevo.
As a general rule, the speaking time is fixed at 15 minutes, irrespective of the formation of the Court to which the case has been assigned. However, that duration may be made longer or shorter depending on the nature or the specific complexity of the case, the number and procedural status of the participants in the hearing and any measures of organisation of procedure.
Ta čas za podajanje navedb je praviloma omejen na petnajst minut, ne glede na sestavo, ki ji je bila zadeva dodeljena, vendar ga je mogoče podaljšati ali skrajšati glede na vrsto in zapletenost zadeve, število in procesni status udeležencev postopka ter morebitne ukrepe procesnega vodstva.
An extension of the speaking time allocated may, exceptionally, be granted by the President of the formation of the Court on the duly reasoned application of a party or one of the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute.
Predsednik sestave lahko na podlagi ustrezno utemeljenega predloga stranke ali zainteresiranega subjekta iz člena 23 Statuta izjemoma odobri podaljšanje dodeljenega časa za podajanje navedb.
To be taken into account, such an application must nevertheless be made by the party or interested person concerned in his reply to the letter of notice to attend and, in any event, reach the Court at least two weeks before the actual date of the hearing.
Da pa bi bilo mogoče ta predlog upoštevati, ga mora stranka ali zadevni subjekt podati v odgovoru na vabilo na obravnavo, Sodišče pa ga mora prejeti najpozneje dva tedna pred datumom obravnave.
For reasons connected with the proper conduct of the hearing, the oral submissions of the parties or the interested persons present at the hearing must, as regards each of them, be made by a single person.
Zaradi nemotenega poteka obravnave mora ustne navedbe za vsako stranko ali zainteresirani subjekt, ki je navzoč na obravnavi, podajati ena oseba.
In exceptional circumstances, a second person may nevertheless be authorised to present oral argument where the nature or specific complexity of the case warrants this, provided a duly reasoned application to this effect has been submitted in the reply of the party or interested person concerned to the letter of notice to attend the hearing and, in any event, at least two weeks before the actual date of the hearing.
Izjemoma se lahko na podlagi ustrezno utemeljenega predloga, ki ga je stranka ali zainteresirani subjekt podal v odgovoru na vabilo na obravnavo, vsekakor pa najpozneje dva tedna pred datumom obravnave, dovoli, da ustne navedbe poda še ena oseba, če to upravičujeta narava ali velika zapletenost zadeve.
If it is granted, that authorisation does not however include any extension of the speaking time, and the two persons presenting oral argument must share the speaking time allocated to the party concerned.
Tudi če je tako dovoljenje dano, to ne povzroči podaljšanja časa za podajanje ustnih navedb, saj si osebi, ki podajata navedbe, delita čas za podajanje ustnih navedb, ki je bil dodeljen zadevni stranki.
Without prejudice to the questions which may be asked or the clarifications which may be sought by the members of the Court during the oral submissions, the persons presenting oral argument may be requested, at the end of the oral submissions, to answer additional questions from the members of the Court.
Ne glede na vprašanja, ki jih lahko člani Sodišča postavijo, in pojasnila, za katera lahko ti zaprosijo med podajanjem ustnih navedb, je mogoče osebe, ki podajajo ustne navedbe, ob koncu podajanja teh navedb pozvati, naj odgovorijo na dodatna vprašanja članov Sodišča.
The purpose of those questions is to supplement the members’ knowledge of the file and to allow the persons presenting oral argument to explain or elaborate on certain points on which additional information may be required following the written part of the procedure and the oral submissions.
Namen teh vprašanj je poglobiti njihovo poznavanje spisa in osebam, ki podajajo navedbe, omogočiti, da pojasnijo ali podrobno razložijo nekatere točke, v zvezi s katerimi so po koncu pisnega dela postopka in podajanju ustnih navedb potrebna dodatna pojasnila.
After that exchange, the representatives of the parties or the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Staff Regulations finally have the opportunity, if they consider it necessary, of replying briefly.
Po tej razpravi imajo zastopniki strank in zainteresiranih subjektov iz člena 23 Statuta nazadnje možnost, da na kratko odgovorijo, če menijo, da je to potrebno.
Those replies, of a maximum duration of five minutes each, do not constitute a second round of oral submissions.
Te replike, ki lahko trajajo vsaka po največ pet minut, ne pomenijo drugega kroga podajanja ustnih navedb.
They are designed only to enable the persons presenting oral argument to react succinctly to observations made or questions put during the hearing by the other participants or by the members of the Court.
Njihov edini namen je osebam, ki podajajo ustne navedbe, omogočiti, da se na kratko odzovejo na stališča ali vprašanja drugih udeležencev obravnave ali članov Sodišča, podana med obravnavo.
If two persons have been authorised to speak for a party, only one of them is authorised to reply.
Tudi če je bilo dovoljeno, da ustne navedbe za stranko podajata dve osebi, se replika dovoli samo eni od njiju.
Whether in their oral submissions, their replies or their responses to questions from the Court, the persons presenting oral argument must bear in mind that very frequently the members of the formation of the Court will listen to their argument by means of simultaneous interpretation.
Naj gre za ustne navedbe, replike ali odgovore na vprašanja Sodišča, se morajo osebe, ki podajajo ustne navedbe, zavedati, da člani sestave njihov nastop pogosto spremljajo s simultanim tolmačenjem.
In the interests of the proper conduct of the hearing and in order to guarantee the quality of the interpretation provided, the representatives of the parties or the interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute are therefore requested, if they have a text available, however short, of notes for the oral submissions or an outline of their argument, to send it in advance to the interpretation directorate, either by fax ((+ 352 43033697), or by electronic mail (interpret@curia.europa.eu). That text or those notes for the oral submissions is intended solely for the interpreters and is neither transmitted to the members of the formation of the Court and the Advocate General responsible for the case nor included in the case file.
Za nemoten potek obravnave in za zagotovitev kakovosti opravljenega tolmačenja se zastopnike strank in zainteresiranih subjektov iz člena 23 Statuta poziva, naj besedilo – čeprav strnjeno – zapiskov za ustne navedbe ali osnutek za svoj nastop, če ju imajo, vnaprej posredujejo direktoratu za tolmačenje po telefaksu ((+ 352) 43 03 36 97) ali po elektronski pošti (interpret@curia.europa.eu). To besedilo ali zapiski so namenjeni izključno tolmačem in se ne posredujejo članom sestave in generalnemu pravobranilcu, ki je zadolžen za zadevo, niti se ne vložijo v spis v zadevi.
At the hearing itself, it is however inadvisable to read out a text.
Na obravnavi se zato odsvetuje branje besedila.
To facilitate interpretation, it is recommended to speak freely on the basis of properly structured notes.
Zaradi lažjega tolmačenja se priporoča prosti govor na podlagi dobro pripravljenih zapiskov.
In any event, it is essential to speak directly into the microphone, at a natural pace and not too quickly, stating in advance the outline of the argument made and using short and simple sentences as a matter of course.
Vsekakor je treba z naravnim in ne prehitrim ritmom mirno govoriti v mikrofon, vnaprej predstaviti načrt nastopa ter vedno dati prednost kratkim in preprostim stavkom.
The active participation of the parties or interested persons referred to in Article 23 of the Statute comes to an end at the end of the hearing.
Aktivna udeležba strank in zainteresiranih subjektov iz člena 23 Statuta se ob koncu obravnave konča.
Subject to the exceptional situation in which the oral part of the procedure is reopened, pursuant to Article 83 of the Rules of Procedure, the parties or abovementioned interested persons are no longer authorised to put forward written or oral observations, in particular in response to the Advocate General’s Opinion, once the President of the formation of the Court has declared the hearing closed.
Ko predsednik razglasi konec obravnave, navedene stranke in subjekti ne smejo več podajati pisnih ali ustnih stališč, niti v odgovor na sklepne predloge generalnega pravobranilca, razen v izrednem primeru ponovnega odprtja ustnega dela postopka iz člena 83 Poslovnika.
The practice directions relating to direct actions and appeals of 15 October 2004 (OJ L 361, p. 15), as amended on 27 January 2009 (OJ L 29, p. 51), are hereby revoked and replaced by these Practice Directions.
Ta praktična navodila razveljavljajo in nadomeščajo Praktična navodila v zvezi z neposrednimi tožbami in pritožbami z dne 15. oktobra 2004 (UL L 361, str. 15), kakor so bila spremenjena 27. januarja 2009 (UL L 29, str. 51).
Adopted at Luxembourg, 25 November 2013.
V Luxembourgu, 25. novembra 2013
OJ L 265, 29.9.2012, p. 1, as amended on 18 June 2013 (OJ L 173, 26.6.2013, p. 65).
UL L 265, 29.9.2012, str. 1, kakor je bil spremenjen 18. junija 2013 (UL L 173, 26.6.2013, str. 65).
On 25 September 2012, the Court of Justice, with the approval of the Council, adopted new Rules of Procedure repealing the Rules of Procedure of 19 June 1991, as last amended on 24 May 2011.
Sodišče je 25. septembra 2012 po odobritvi Sveta sprejelo nov poslovnik, s katerim je bil razveljavljen poslovnik z dne 19. junija 1991, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen 24. maja 2011.
The new Rules entered into force on 1 November 2012 and are intended, inter alia, to ensure that the structure and content of the Rules of Procedure of the Court are adapted to changes in its caseload and, in particular, to the increasing number of references for a preliminary ruling made by the courts and tribunals of the Member States of the European Union, while at the same time supplementing and clarifying, in several important respects, the rules applicable to the conduct of proceedings before the Court.
To besedilo, ki je začelo veljati 1. novembra 2012, je med drugim namenjeno prilagoditvi zgradbe in vsebine Poslovnika Sodišča razvoju zadev, ki jih to obravnava, zlasti naraščanju števila predlogov za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki jih vlagajo sodišča držav članic Unije, obenem pa z več vidikov dopolnjuje in pojasnjuje pravila, ki urejajo potek postopka pred Sodiščem.
These are set out in Article 119 et seq. (Title IV) of the Rules of Procedure and concern both the obligation for the parties to be represented by an agent or lawyer and the formal requirements linked to the content and the submission of written pleadings.
Določena so v členu 119 in naslednjih (naslov IV) Poslovnika in se nanašajo na obveznost, da stranke zastopa agent ali odvetnik, ter na formalne zahteve v zvezi z vsebino in vlaganjem vlog.
The relevant rules are in Article 167 et seq. (Title V) of the Rules of Procedure, which state both the mandatory content of the appeal and of the response and the scope of the forms of order sought.
Upoštevna pravila so navedena v členu 167 in naslednjih (naslov V) Poslovnika, ki podrobneje določajo nujno vsebino pritožbe in odgovora na pritožbo ter predmet njunih predlogov.
That application, common to the three constituent courts of the Court of Justice of the European Union, was introduced in 2011.
Ta aplikacija, ki je skupna trem sodiščem, ki sestavljajo Sodišče Evropske unije, se uporablja od leta 2011.
It allows the lodging and service of procedural documents by exclusively electronic means, without it being necessary to provide certified copies of the document transmitted to the Court or to duplicate that transmission by sending the document by post.
Omogoča vlaganje in vročanje procesnih aktov izključno elektronsko, ne da bi bilo treba pripraviti overjene prepise aktov, ki se posredujejo Sodišču, ali to posredovanje podvajati s pošiljanjem po pošti.
A hearing will not automatically be arranged.
Kar zadeva obravnavo, se ta ne opravi nujno.
The purpose of the oral submissions Speaking time and its possible extension
Čas za podajanje ustnih navedb in njegovo morebitno podaljšanje
SUPPLEMENTARY RULES OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE
DODATEK K POSLOVNIKU SODIŠČA
Chapter I — Letters rogatory (Articles 1 to 3)
Poglavje I – Zaprosila za pravno pomoč (členi 1 do 3)
Chapter II — Legal aid (Articles 4 and 5)
Poglavje II – Brezplačna pravna pomoč (člena 4 in 5)
Chapter III — Reports of perjury by a witness or expert (Articles 6 and 7)
Poglavje III – Ovadba kršitev prisege prič in izvedencev (člena 6 in 7)
Final provisions (Articles 8 and 9)
Končne določbe (člena 8 in 9)
Annex I — List referred to in Article 2(1)
Priloga I – Seznam iz člena 2(1)
Annex II — List referred to in Article 4(2)
Priloga II – Seznam iz člena 4(2)
Annex III — List referred to in Article 6
Priloga III – Seznam iz člena 6
THE COURT OF JUSTICE,
SODIŠČE –
Having regard to Article 207 of the Rules of Procedure [1],
ob upoštevanju člena 207 Poslovnika [1],
Having regard to Article 46(3) of the act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded [2],
ob upoštevanju člena 46(3) Akta o pogojih pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije in prilagoditvah Pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija [2],
Having regard to Article 45 of the act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia and the adjustments to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community [3],
ob upoštevanju člena 45 Akta o pogojih pristopa Republike Hrvaške in prilagoditvah Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo [3],
On 25 September 2012 the Court adopted new Rules of Procedure containing various amendments, both of substance and of form, in relation to the previous Rules, which they repealed.
Sodišče je 25. septembra 2012 sprejelo nov poslovnik, ki tako vsebinsko kot oblikovno vsebuje več sprememb prejšnjega poslovnika, ki ga razveljavlja.
Those amendments concern, in particular, the terminology used in the new Rules of Procedure and the procedure followed when legal aid is granted.
Te spremembe zadevajo zlasti terminologijo v novem poslovniku in postopek ob odobritvi brezplačne pravne pomoči.
Those alterations must, therefore, be reflected in the wording of the Supplementary Rules.
Zato jih je treba upoštevati v besedilu dodatka k Poslovniku.
In consequence of several Member States’ designation of new authorities responsible for the handling of the matters referred to in Articles 2, 4 and 6 of the Supplementary Rules and of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania on 1 January 2007 and of the Republic of Croatia on 1 July 2013, it would furthermore appear necessary to bring up to date the lists in the three annexes to those Rules.
Zaradi določitve – s strani več držav članic – novih organov, pristojnih za obravnavo vprašanj iz členov 2, 4 in 6 dodatka k Poslovniku, in pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije (1. januarja 2007) ter Republike Hrvaške (1. julija 2013) k Evropski uniji, je poleg tega treba posodobiti sezname iz treh prilog k dodatku k Poslovniku,
With the Council’s approval given on 17 December 2013,
po odobritvi Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 –
HAS ADOPTED THESE SUPPLEMENTARY RULES:
SPREJME TA DODATEK K POSLOVNIKU:
Letters rogatory shall be issued in the form of an order which shall contain the names, forenames, description and address of the witness or expert, set out the facts on which the witness or expert is to be examined, name the parties, their agents, lawyers or advisers, indicate their addresses for service and briefly describe the subject-matter of the proceedings.
Zaprosilo se izda v obliki sklepa, v katerem je treba navesti ime, priimek, status in naslov priče ali izvedenca, dejstva, o katerih je treba pričo ali izvedenca zaslišati, stranke, njihove agente, odvetnike ali svetovalce, naslove za vročitev in povzetek predmeta spora.
Notice of the order shall be served on the parties by the Registrar.
Sodni tajnik vroči sklep strankam.
The Registrar shall send the order to the competent authority named in Annex I of the Member State in whose territory the witness or expert is to be examined.
Sodni tajnik posreduje sklep pristojnemu organu v državi članici, navedenemu v Prilogi I, na ozemlju katere je treba opraviti zaslišanje prič ali izvedencev.
Where necessary, the order shall be accompanied by a translation into the official languages of the Member State to which it is addressed.
Po potrebi se sklepu priloži prevod v uradni jezik ali uradne jezike države članice, na katero je naslovljen.
The authority named pursuant to paragraph 1 shall pass on the order to the judicial authority which is competent according to its national law.
Organ iz odstavka 1 posreduje sklep sodišču, ki je pristojno na podlagi notranjega prava.
The competent judicial authority shall give effect to the letters rogatory in accordance with its national law.
Pristojno sodišče izvrši zaprosilo za pravno pomoč v skladu z določbami notranjega prava.
After implementation the competent judicial authority shall transmit to the authority named pursuant to paragraph 1 the order embodying the letters rogatory, any documents arising from the implementation and a detailed statement of costs.
Po izvršitvi pristojno sodišče organu iz odstavka 1 posreduje sklep, ki vsebuje zaprosilo za pravno pomoč, listine v zvezi z opravljeno pravno pomočjo in stroškovnik.
These documents shall be sent to the Registrar of the Court.
Te dokumente je treba posredovati sodnemu tajniku Sodišča.
The Registrar shall be responsible for the translation of the documents into the language of the case.
Sodni tajnik zagotovi prevod listin v jezik postopka.