natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the price at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Union by deducting all costs, incurred between importation and re-sale (SG & A) and a reasonable profit margin.
Kar zadeva razumno stopnjo dobička, je bila, ker ni bilo na voljo nobenih drugih informacij, uporabljena ocenjena stopnja dobička v višini 5 %.
Actual SG & A of the related importer were used.
Po razkritju je vložnik izpodbijal stopnjo PSA, povezano s prodajo zadevnega izdelka in določeno med preiskavo, pri čemer je trdil, da višjih stroškov, ki so nastali pri prodaji drugih izdelkov, ne bi smeli pripisati zadevnemu izdelku.
As regards the reasonable profit margin, in the absence of any other information available, an estimated profit margin of 5 % was used.
Ta trditev je bila v nasprotju s preverjenimi podatki.
Following disclosure the applicant contested the level of the SG & A related to the sales of the product concerned established during the investigation claiming that higher costs incurred when selling other products should not be attributed to the product concerned.
Vložnik tudi ni mogel predložiti alternativne razporeditve stroškov niti nobenega drugega dokaza, ki bi podprl njegovo trditev, ki je bila zato zavrnjena.
This claim contradicted the verified data.
Po razkritju je vložnik trdil, da so bile kljub temu odnosu med izvoznikom in povezanim uvoznikom v Uniji izvozne cene določene po običajnih tržnih pogojih in jih ne bi smeli šteti za nezanesljive.
The applicant was also not able to provide an alternative cost allocation, nor any evidence that would support its claim which was therefore rejected.
Zato je vložnik menil, da bi bilo treba izvozno ceno določiti v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe kot ceno, ki jo je plačal povezani uvoznik.
Following disclosure, the applicant claimed that despite the relationship between the exporter and the related importer in the Union, the export prices were at arm ' s length and they should not be considered unreliable.
Dokazi, ki jih je predložil vložnik, niso potrdili trditve, da je bila cena določena po običajnih tržnih pogojih.
Therefore, the applicant considered that the export price should be established in accordance with the Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation as the price paid by the related importer.
Zato transferna cena med povezanimi družbami ni bila na ravni, ki bi povezanemu uvozniku omogočala, da bi lahko v Uniji ustvaril primeren dobiček.
The evidence provided by the applicant did not support the claim that the price was established at arm ' s length.
Komisija je zato sklenila, da notranja transferna cena ne odraža ustrezne tržne vrednosti zadevnega izdelka in to trditev zavrnila.
Thus, the transfer price between the related companies was not at a level to allow the related importer to make a reasonable profit in the Union.
Namesto tega je tudi po razkritju vložnik trdil, da so bile plačane protidampinške dajatve ustrezno odražene v cenah pri nadaljnji prodaji in v nadaljnjih prodajnih cenah v Uniji ter zato pri konstruiranju izvozne cene znesek plačane protidampinške dajatve ne bi smel biti odbit v skladu s členom 11(10) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission therefore concluded that the internal transfer price did not reflect the appropriate market value of the product concerned and this claim was rejected.
Dokazi, ki jih je predložil vložnik, pa niso potrjev ali, da so bile protidampinške dajatve ustrezno odražene v cenah pri nadaljnji prodaji in nadaljnjih prodajnih cenah v Uniji.
Alternatively, also following disclosure the applicant claimed that the anti-dumping duties paid were duly reflected in resale prices and the subsequent selling prices in the Union and, therefore, when constructing the export price the amount for anti-dumping duties paid should not be deducted in line with Article 11(10) of the basic Regulation.
Dokazi kažejo na minimalno povečanje, ki je nastopilo celo po obdobju preiskave.
The evidence provided by the applicant could not, however, demonstrate that the anti-dumping duties were duly reflected in resale prices and the subsequent selling prices in the Union.
Ta trditev je bila zato zavrnjena.
The evidence suggested a very minimal increase that even occurred after the investigation period.
Primerjava
Therefore, this claim was rejected.
Normalna vrednost in izvozna cena sta bili primerjani na podlagi franko tovarna.
Comparison
Za zagotavljanje poštene primerjave so se izvedli ustrezni popravki v obliki prilagoditev, ki so vplivale na primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
The normal value and the export price were compared on an ex-works basis.
Na podlagi tega so bile izvedene prilagoditve za prevoz, stroške pakiranja in uvozne dajatve, vključno s carinami (4 %) in protidampinškimi dajatvami (46,7 % in 70,8 %, uvedene z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1008/2011 oziroma spremenjene z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 372/2013), neposredno na izvozne cene v vseh primerih, kadar so bile dokazane razlike, ki so vplivale na primerljivost cen.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Zgoraj navedeni stroški prevoza in pakiranja se v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe štejejo za zaupne informacije.
On this basis, adjustments were made for freight, packing expenses and import charges, inluding the custom duties (4 %) and anti-dumping duties (46,7 % and 70,8 %, imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 and amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 respectively) directly on the export price in all cases where demonstrated for differences affecting price comparability.
Vendar je to informacijo Komisija preverila in ugotovila, da ne odstopa od običajnih stopenj.
The aforementioned freight and packing expenses are, in accordance with the Article 19 of the basic Regulation, considered as confidential information.
Po razkritju je vložnik vložil zahtevek za prilagoditev stopnje trgovine na podlagi domnevne razlike med prodajo na notranjem in na izvoznem trgu.
However, this information was verified by the Commission and it was found not to deviate from the usual levels.
Vložnik je trdil, da je bila celotna prodaja na domačem trgu opravljena končnim uporabnikom, medtem ko je bila prodaja v Uniji namenjena trgovcem ali uvoznikom.
Following disclosure the applicant made a claim for a level of trade adjustment based on an alleged difference between sales on the domestic market and on the export market.
Vložnik je trdil, da bi bilo treba izvesti posebno prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(d)(ii) osnovne uredbe.
The applicant claimed that sales on the domestic market were all made to end-users while sales in the Union were made to dealers or importers.
Vložnik ni predložil novih ali dodatnih informacij v podporo svoji trditvi.
The applicant claimed that a special adjustment should be made under Article 2(10)(d)(ii) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi informacij, zbranih in preverjenih med preiskavo, ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, da so bili popusti za trgovce in uvoznike povezani z razliko v funkcijah prodaje.
The applicant provided no new or additional information to support its claim.
Zato ni bilo mogoče dokazati, da je domnevna razlika v stopnji trgovine vplivala na prodajne cene in na primerljivost cen.
On the basis of the information collected and verified during the investigation it could not be established that the discounts to dealers and importers were linked to a difference in sales functions.
Na podlagi tega je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
Therefore, it could not be demonstrated that the alleged difference in the level of trade had an impact on the sales prices and affected price comparability.
Stopnja dampinga
On this basis, the claim was rejected.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga ugotovljena na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtanimi povprečnimi izvoznimi cenami, kakor so bile določene zgoraj.
Dumping margin
Primerjava je pokazala obstoj dampinga v višini 54,1 %, izraženega kot odstotek cene CIF (stroški, zavarovanje in prevoznina) meja Unije brez plačane dajatve.
In accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with the weighted average of export price as established above.
SPREMEMBA UKREPOV, KI SE PREGLEDUJEJO
The comparison showed existence of dumping at a level of 54,1 %, expressed as a percentage of the Cost, Insurance and Freight (CIF) Union-frontier price, duty unpaid.
Določena stopnja dampinga je bila nižja od stopnje odprave škode za celotno državo, ki je bila določena za LRK v prvotni preiskavi iz uvodne izjave 1.
AMENDMENT OF THE MEASURES BEING REVIEWED
Zato bi bilo treba na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov, ki jih proizvaja družba Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd., uvesti dajatev, ki temelji na stopnji dampinga, Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 372/2013 pa bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The dumping margin as established was below the country-wide injury elimination level which was established for the PRC in the original investigation referred to in recital 1 above.
REGISTRACIJA
A duty based on the dumping margin should therefore be imposed on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts produced by Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 should be amended accordingly.
Glede na navedene ugotovitve bi se morala določena protidampinška dajatev retroaktivno obračunati za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, za katerega velja registracija v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (EU) št. 32/2014.
REGISTRATION
RAZKRITJE IN TRAJANJE UKREPOV
In the light of the above findings, the anti-dumping duty as established should be levied retroactively on imports of the product concerned which were made subject to registration pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 32/2014.
Zadevne stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala uvesti spremenjena protidampinška dajatev na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov vložnika in retroaktivno obračunati to dajatev za uvoz, za katerega velja registracija.
DISCLOSURE AND DURATION OF THE MEASURES
Njihove pripombe so bile preučene in upoštevane, kjer je bilo to primerno.
The parties concerned were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to impose on imports hand pallet trucks and their essential parts from the applicant an amended anti-dumping duty and to levy this duty retroactively on imports made subject to registration.
Ta pregled ne vpliva na datum izteka ukrepov, uvedenih z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 1008/2011, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo (EU) št. 372/2013, v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
Their comments were considered and taken into account were appropriate.
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 15(1) osnovne uredbe –
This review does not affect the date on which the measures imposed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 will expire pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation.
Člen 1
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
V členu 1 Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 372/2013, ki nadomešča člen 1(2) Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1008/2011, se v tabelo v zvezi z Ljudsko republiko Kitajsko vstavi:
Article 1
Družba
In Article 1 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013, which replaces Article 1(2) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011, the following shall be inserted into the table regarding the People ' s Republic of China:
Stopnja dajatve
Rate of duty
Uvedena protidampinška dajatev se retroaktivno obračuna tudi za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki je bil registriran v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (EU) št. 32/2014.
TARIC additional code
Carinskim organom se dajo navodila, naj prenehajo z registracijo uvoza zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvaja družba Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd.
The duty hereby imposed shall also be levied retroactively on imports of the product concerned which have been registered pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 32/2014.
Če ni določeno drugače, se uporabljajo veljavni carinski predpisi.
The customs authorities are hereby directed to cease the registration of imports of the product concerned produced by Ningbo Logitrans Handling Equipment Co., Ltd
Člen 2
Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
V Bruslju, 4. septembra 2014
Done at Brussels, 4 September 2014.
Predsednik
OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1174/2005 z dne 18. julija 2005 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene za uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 189, 21.7.2005, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 of 18 July 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People ' s Republic of China (OJ L 189, 21.7.2005, p.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 684/2008 z dne 17. julija 2008 o določitvi obsega uporabe protidampinških ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo (ES) št. 1174/2005 o uvozu ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske (UL L 192, 19.7.2008, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 684/2008 of 17 July 2008 clarifying the scope of the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People ' s Republic of China (OJ L 192, 19.7.2008, p.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 499/2009 z dne 11. junija 2009 o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1174/2005 na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega s Tajske, s prijavljenim poreklom iz Tajske ali ne (UL L 151, 16.6.2009, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 of 11 June 2009 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People ' s Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not (OJ L 151, 16.6.2009, p.
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1008/2011 z dne 10. oktobra 2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, kakor je bila razširjena na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov, poslanih iz Tajske, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot izdelek s poreklom iz Tajske ali ne, po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepov na podlagi člena 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 (UL L 268, 13.10.2011, str.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 of 10 October 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People ' s Republic of China as extended to imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 268, 13.10.2011, p.
Izvedbena uredba Sveta (EU) št. 372/2013 z dne 22. aprila 2013 o spremembi Izvedbene uredbe (EU) št. 1008/2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, po delnem vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1225/2009 (UL L 112, 24.4.2013, str.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 372/2013 of 22 April 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1008/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People ' s Republic of China following a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 112, 24.4.2013, p.
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 32/2014 z dne 14. januarja 2014 o začetku pregleda Izvedbene uredbe Sveta (EU) št. 1008/2011 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, kakor je bila spremenjena z Izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 372/2013, v zvezi z odpravo dajatve na uvoz od enega izvoznika iz te države in uvedbo registracije za takšen uvoz (UL L 10, 15.1.2014, str.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 951/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 951/2014
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 953/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 953/2014
Done at Brussels, 5 September 2014.
V Bruslju, 5. septembra 2014
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 954/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 954/2014
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Livarot (PDO))
o odobritvi večje spremembe specifikacije za ime, vpisano v registru zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb (Livarot (ZOP))
By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Livarot’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 [2].
Komisija je v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 53(1) Uredbe (EU) št. 1151/2012 preučila vlogo Francije za odobritev spremembe specifikacije za zaščiteno označbo porekla „Livarot“, registrirano v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1107/96 [2].
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Livarot’ (PDO) are hereby approved.
Sprememba specifikacije, objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije v zvezi z imenom „Livarot“ (ZOP), se odobri.
OJ C 125, 26.4.2014, p. 8.
UL C 125, 26.4.2014, str. 8.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 955/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 955/2014
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 956/2014
Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 956/2014
of 9 September 2014
z dne 9. septembra 2014
Done at Brussels, 9 September 2014.
V Bruslju, 9. septembra 2014
Commission Regulation (EU) No 957/2014
Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 957/2014
amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 as regards the removal of montan acid esters (E 912)
o spremembi Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter Priloge k Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 231/2012 glede črtanja estrov montanske kisline (E 912)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on food additives [1], and in particular Articles 10(3) and 14 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1333/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2008 o aditivih za živila [1] ter zlasti člena 10(3) in člena 14 Uredbe,
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 lays down a Union list of food additives approved for use in foods and their conditions of use.
V Prilogi II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008 so določeni seznam Unije aditivov za živila, odobrenih za uporabo v živilih, in pogoji njihove uporabe.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 [2] lays down specifications for food additives that are listed in Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008.
V Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 231/2012 [2] so določene specifikacije za aditive za živila, navedene v prilogah II in III k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008.
Montan acid esters (E 912) are waxes authorised as glazing agents for surface treatment of citrus fruit, melons, papayas, mangos, avocados and pineapples in accordance with Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008.
Estri montanske kisline (E 912) so voski, odobreni kot sredstva za glaziranje za površinsko obdelavo agrumov, melon, papaje, manga, avokada in ananasa v skladu s Prilogo II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1333/2008.
Article 32(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 provides that all food additives that were already permitted in the Union before 20 January 2009 are subject to a new risk assessment by the European Food Safety Authority (‘the Authority’).
Člen 32(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1333/2008 določa, da za vse aditive za živila, ki so bili v Uniji dovoljeni pred 20. januarjem 2009, Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Agencija) izvede novo oceno tveganja.
For that purpose, a program for the re-evaluation of food additives is laid down in the Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010 [3].
V ta namen je v Uredbi Komisije (EU) št. 257/2010 [3] določen program za ponovno oceno aditivov za živila.
However, certain food additives, including montan acid esters (E 912), havehigher priority and should be evaluated earlier.
Agencija je v javnem pozivu za predložitev znanstvenih podatkov o estrih montanske kisline (E 912) z dne 15. februarja 2012 [4] pozvala zainteresirane strani in deležnike, naj predložijo zahtevane podatke ali zagotovijo informacije do 1. junija 2012.
Pursuant to Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) No 257/2010, the interested business operator(s) and any other interested party shall submit the data related to the re-evaluation of a food additive within the period set by the Authority in its call for data.
Agencija je 7. junija 2013 predložila znanstveno mnenje o ponovni oceni estrov montanske kisline (E 912) kot aditivov za živila [5].
On 15 February 2012 the Authority launched a public call for scientific data on montan acid esters (E 912) [4] inviting interested parties and stakeholders to submit the requested data or to provide information by 1 June 2012.
V mnenju je navedla, da podatki o toksikokinetiki ter reproduktivni in razvojni toksičnosti estrov montanske kisline niso bili na voljo.
On 7 June 2013 the Authority delivered a Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of montan acid esters (E 912) as food additives [5].
Razpoložljivi podatki o kratkoročni in subkronični toksičnosti, genotoksičnosti, kronični toksičnosti in rakotvornosti estrov montanske kisline so bili omejeni.
The opinion stated that no data on toxicokinetics and reproductive and developmental toxicity of montan acid esters were available.
Podatki o uporabi so bili predloženi.
The available data on short-term and subchronic toxicity, genotoxicity and chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of montan acid esters were limited.
Na podlagi navedenih omejitev je Agencija ugotovila, da estrov montanske kisline kot aditiva za živila ni mogoče oceniti.
No data on the usage were submitted.
Člen 6(5) Uredbe (EU) št. 257/2010 določa, da se aditiv za živila lahko črta s seznama Unije odobrenih aditivov za živila v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 10(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1333/2008, če zainteresirani nosilci dejavnosti in vse druge zainteresirane strani Agenciji v predpisanih rokih ne predložijo informacij, ki so potrebne za zaključitev ponovne ocene posameznega aditiva za živila.
Based on those limitations the Authority concluded that montan acid esters as food additive could not be evaluated.
V skladu s tem bi bilo treba iz Uredbe (EU) št. 231/2012 črtati tudi specifikacije za ta aditiv za živila.