natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1312/2008 of 19 December 2008 fixing the conversion rates, the processing costs and the value of the by-products for the various stages of rice processing (OJ L 344, 20.12.2008, p. 56).
Uredba (EU) št. 1306/2013 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o financiranju, upravljanju in spremljanju skupne kmetijske politike in o razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 352/78, (ES) št. 165/94, (ES) št. 2799/98, (ES) št. 814/2000, (ES) št. 1290/2005 in (ES) št. 485/2008 (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str. 549).
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671).
Uredba (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države članice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije (UL L 55, 28.2.2011, str. 13).
Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 549).
Uredba (EU) št. 978/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2012 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008 (UL L 303, 31.10.2012, str. 1).
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
PRILOGA
Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 (OJ L 303, 31.10.2012, p. 1).
Korelacijska tabela
ANNEX
Uredba (EGS) št. 3491/90
Correlation table
Ta uredba
Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90
Člen 2(1)
This Regulation
Člen 1(2)
Article 2(1)
Člen 2(2)
Article 1(2)
Člen 1(3)
Article 2(2)
Členi 3 do 6
Article 1(3)
IZJAVA KOMISIJE O DELEGIRANIH AKTIH
Articles 3 to 6
Komisija v zvezi z Uredbo (EU) št. 539/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. aprila 2014 o uvozu riža s poreklom iz Bangladeša in spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3491/90 [1] opozarja na sprejeto zavezo, navedeno v odstavku 15 okvirnega sporazuma o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Evropsko komisijo, da bo Parlamentu zagotovila vse informacije in dokumente, povezane s svojimi sestanki z nacionalnimi strokovnjaki v okviru svojega dela pri pripravi delegiranih aktov
STATEMENT ON DELEGATED ACTS
Glej stran 125 tega Uradnega lista.
In the context of Regulation (EU) No 539/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on imports of rice originating in Bangladesh and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3491/90 [1], the Commission recalls the commitment it has taken in paragraph 15 of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission to provide to the Parliament full information and documentation on its meetings with national experts within the framework of its work on the preparation of delegated acts.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 3 se prenese na Komisijo za obdobje petih let od 28. maja 2014.
See page 125 of this Official Journal.
Komisija pripravi poročilo o prenosu pooblastila najpozneje devet mesecev pred koncem petletnega obdobja.
Regulation (EU) No 540/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (EU) št. 540/2014 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the sound level of motor vehicles and of replacement silencing systems, and amending Directive 2007/46/EC and repealing Directive 70/157/EEC
o ravni hrupa motornih vozil in nadomestnih sistemih za dušenje zvoka ter o spremembi Direktive 2007/46/ES ter razveljavitvi Direktive 70/157/EGS
In accordance with Article 26(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is to be ensured.
V skladu s členom 26(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) zajema notranji trg območje brez notranjih meja, na katerem je zagotovljen prost pretok blaga, oseb, storitev in kapitala.
To that end, a comprehensive EU type-approval system for motor vehicles is in place.
V ta namen je bil vzpostavljen celovit sistem za EU-homologacijo motornih vozil.
The technical requirements for the EU type-approval of motor vehicles and their silencing systems with regard to permissible sound levels should be harmonised to avoid the adoption of requirements that differ from one Member State to another, and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while, at the same time, providing for a high level of environmental protection and public safety, a better quality of life and health, and taking account of road vehicles as a significant source of noise in the transport sector.
Tehnične zahteve za EU-homologacijo motornih vozil in njihovih sistemov za dušenje zvoka glede na dovoljeno raven hrupa bi bilo treba uskladiti, da se v posameznih državah članicah ne bi sprejemale različne zahteve, da se zagotovijo pravilno delovanje notranjega trga ter obenem visoka raven varstva okolja in javne varnosti, boljša kakovost življenja in zdravja ter upošteva, da so cestna vozila pomemben vir hrupa v prometnem sektorju.
EU type-approval requirements already apply in the context of Union law regulating various aspects of the performance of motor vehicles, such as CO2 emissions from cars and light commercial vehicles, pollutant emissions and safety standards.
Zahteve za EU-homologacijo se že uporabljajo v okviru prava Unije, ki ureja različne vidike delovanja motornih vozil, kot so emisije CO2 iz osebnih vozil in lahkih gospodarskih vozil, emisije onesnaževal in varnostni standardi.
The technical requirements applicable pursuant to this Regulation should be developed in a way that ensures a consistent approach throughout that Union law, taking into account all relevant noise factors.
Tehnične zahteve, ki se uporabljajo v skladu s to uredbo, bi bilo treba oblikovati tako, da bi zagotovili skladni pristop v celotnem pravu Unije in pri tem upoštevali vse zadevne dejavnike, povezane s hrupom.
Traffic noise harms health in numerous ways.
Hrup prometa škoduje zdravju na različne načine.
Protracted noise-related stress can exhaust human physical reserves, disrupt the regulatory capacity of organ functions and hence limit their effectiveness.
Dolgotrajen stres, ki ga povzroča hrup, lahko izčrpa telesne rezerve človeka, povzroči motnje v regulacijski sposobnosti funkcij organov in s tem omejuje njihovo delovanje.
Traffic noise is a potential risk factor for the development of medical conditions and incidents such as high blood pressure and heart attacks.
Hrup prometa je potencialni dejavnik tveganja za razvoj bolezni in dogodkov, kot sta visok krvni tlak in srčni infarkt.
The effects of traffic noise should be further researched in the same manner as provided for in Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
Učinke hrupa prometa bi bilo treba nadalje preučiti, in sicer na isti način, kot to predvideva Direktiva 2002/49/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3].
Council Directive 70/157/EEC [4] harmonised the different technical requirements of Member States relating to the permissible sound level of motor vehicles and of their exhaust systems for the purpose of the establishment and operation of the internal market.
V Direktivi Sveta 70/157/EGS [4] so bile usklajene različne tehnične zahteve držav članic v zvezi z dovoljeno ravnijo hrupa motornih vozil in njihovih izpušnih sistemov z namenom vzpostavitve in delovanja notranjega trga.
For the purposes of the proper functioning of the internal market and in order to ensure a uniform and consistent application throughout the Union, it is appropriate to replace that Directive by this Regulation.
Za zagotovitev pravilnega delovanja notranjega trga ter enotne in dosledne uporabe po vsej Uniji je navedeno direktivo primerno nadomestiti s to uredbo.
This Regulation constitutes a separate Regulation in the context of the type-approval procedure under Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [5].
Ta uredba predstavlja ločeno uredbo v okviru postopka homologacije v skladu z Direktivo 2007/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5].
Accordingly, Annexes IV, VI and XI to that Directive should be amended.
Zato bi bilo treba priloge IV, VI in XI k navedeni direktivi ustrezno spremeniti.
Directive 70/157/EEC refers to Regulation No 51 of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) on noise emissions [6], which specifies the test method for noise emissions, and to UNECE Regulation No 59 on uniform provisions concerning the approval of replacement silencing systems [7].
Direktiva 70/157/EGS se sklicuje na Pravilnik št. 51 Ekonomske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo (UN/ECE) o emisijah hrupa [6], v katerem je določena preskusna metoda za emisije hrupa, in na Pravilnik št. 59 UN/ECE o enotnih predpisih o homologiranju nadomestnih sistemov za dušenje zvoka [7].
As a Contracting Party to the Agreement of UNECE of 20 March 1958 concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions [8], the Union has decided to apply those Regulations.
Kot pogodbenica Sporazuma Gospodarske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo z dne 20. marca 1958 o sprejetju enotnih tehničnih predpisov za cestna vozila, opremo in dele, ki se lahko vgradijo v cestna vozila in/ali uporabijo na njih, in o pogojih za vzajemno priznanje homologacij, dodeljenih na podlagi teh predpisov [8], je Unija sprejela odločitev, da bo uporabila navedena pravilnika.
Since its adoption, Directive 70/157/EEC has been substantially amended several times.
Od njenega sprejema, je bila Direktiva 70/157/EGS večkrat znatno spremenjena.
The most recent reduction of sound level limits for motor vehicles, introduced in 1995, did not have the effects expected.
Zadnje znižanje mejne vrednosti hrupa za motorna vozila, ki je bilo uvedeno leta 1995, ni imelo pričakovanih učinkov.
Studies showed that the test method used under that Directive no longer reflected real life driving behaviour in urban traffic.
Študije so pokazale, da preskusna metoda, ki se uporablja na podlagi navedene direktive, ne odraža več dejanskega načina vožnje v mestnem prometu.
In particular, as pointed out in the Green Paper on the Future Noise Policy of 4 November 1996, the contribution of tyre-rolling noise to total noise emissions was underestimated in the test method.
Predvsem je bil, kot je poudarjeno v Zeleni knjigi o prihodnji politiki glede hrupa z dne 4. novembra 1996, v preskusni metodi podcenjen prispevek kotalnega hrupa pnevmatik k skupnim emisijam hrupa.
This Regulation should therefore introduce a different test method from that laid down in Directive 70/157/EEC.
Ta uredba bi zato morala uvesti preskusno metodo, ki se razlikuje od preskusne metode iz Direktive 70/157/EGS.
The results of monitoring of both the old and the new test methods were submitted to the Commission.
Zato je treba v to uredbo vključiti dodatne določbe za emisije hrupa.
The new test method is considered to be representative for sound levels during normal traffic conditions, but it is less representative for sound levels under worst case conditions.
Te določbe bi morale opredeliti preventivne zahteve, ki bodo zajemale vozne razmere vozila v dejanskem prometu in ne v homologacijskem voznem ciklu, s čimer bi preprečili pojav „cycle beating“ (pojav dejansko večjih emisij kot v preskusnih ciklih).
Therefore, it is necessary to lay down in this Regulation additional sound emission provisions.
Navedene vozne razmere so okoljsko pomembne in zagotoviti je treba, da se emisije hrupa vozila v cestnih voznih razmerah bistveno ne razlikujejo od tega, kar se lahko pričakuje od rezultata homologacijskega preskusa določenega vozila.
Those provisions should establish preventive requirements intended to cover driving conditions of the vehicle in real traffic outside the type-approval driving cycle and to prevent cycle beating.
V tej uredbi bi bilo treba tudi dodatno znižati mejne vrednosti hrupa.
Those driving conditions are environmentally relevant and it is important to ensure that the sound emission of a vehicle under street-driving conditions does not differ significantly from what can be expected from the type-approval test result for the specific vehicle.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba nove strožje zahteve glede hrupa za pnevmatike motornih vozil iz Uredbe (ES) št. 661/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [9].
This Regulation should also further reduce sound level limits.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba tudi študije, ki opozarjajo na preglavice zaradi hrupa cestnega prometa in negativne učinke tega hrupa na zdravje ter s tem povezane stroške in koristi.
It should take account of the new stricter noise requirements for motor vehicle tyres laid down in Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council [9].
Splošne mejne vrednosti bi bilo treba znižati glede na vse vire hrupa pri motornih vozilih, vključno z vstopno odprtino za zrak v celotnem pogonskem sistemu in izpuhom, ob tem pa upoštevati prispevek pnevmatik k zmanjšanju hrupa iz Uredbe (ES) št. 661/2009.
Studies highlighting the annoyance and adverse health effects resulting from road traffic noise and the associated costs and benefits should also be taken into account.
Poglavje III Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [10], v skladu s katerim morajo države članice nadzorovati trg in proizvode, ki prihajajo na trg Unije, se uporablja za proizvode, ki so zajeti v tej uredbi.
The overall limit values should be reduced with regard to all noise sources of motor vehicles including the air intake over the power train and the exhaust, taking into account the tyre contribution to noise reduction referred to in Regulation (EC) No 661/2009.
Pri hrupu gre za večplasten problem, saj ima več virov in dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na zvok, ki ga slišijo ljudje, in njegov učinek nanje.
Chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council [10], in accordance with which Member States are required to carry out market surveillance and control products entering the Union market, applies to the products covered by this Regulation.
Ravni hrupa vozil so deloma odvisne od okolja, v katerem se ta vozila uporabljajo, zlasti od kakovosti cestne infrastrukture, zato je treba sprejeti bolj integriran pristop.
Noise is a multifaceted issue with multiple sources and factors that influence the sound perceived by people and the impact of that sound upon them.
V Direktivi 2002/49/ES je določeno, da je treba redno pripravljati strateške karte hrupa, med drugim kar zadeva večje ceste.
Vehicle sound levels are partially dependent on the environment in which the vehicles are used, in particular the quality of the road infrastructure, and therefore a more integrated approach is required.
Informacije iz teh kart bi bile lahko osnova za prihodnje raziskovalno delo glede okoljskega hrupa na splošno, zlasti pa hrupa na cestni površini, pa tudi za vodnike po najboljših praksah v zvezi s tehnološkim razvojem kakovosti cest in razvrstitvijo tipov cestne površine, če je to ustrezno.
Directive 2002/49/EC requires strategic noise maps to be drawn up periodically as regards, inter alia, major roads.
Tehnični ukrepi za zmanjšanje ravni hrupa motornih vozil morajo izpolnjevati več enako pomembnih zahtev, kot so zahteve za zmanjšanje hrupa in emisij onesnaževal ter izboljšanje varnosti, pri čemer mora biti zadevno vozilo čim cenejše in učinkovitejše.
The Sixth Community Environment Action Programme [11] set out the framework for environmental policy-making in the Union for the period 2002-2012.
Avtomobilskemu razvoju vedno znova uspe preseči te meje z uporabo novih ter inovativnih materialov in metod.
That programme called for actions in the field of noise pollution to substantially reduce the number of people regularly affected by long-term average levels of noise, particularly from traffic.
Pravo Unije bi moralo določiti jasen in časovno izvedljiv okvir za inovacije.
Technical measures to reduce the sound level of motor vehicles have to comply with a set of competing requirements, such as those of reducing noise and pollutant emissions and improving safety whilst keeping the vehicle in question as cheap and efficient as possible.
Ta uredba določa ta okvir in s tem zagotavlja takojšnjo spodbudo za inovacije, ki se odzivajo na potrebe družbe, hkrati pa na noben način ne omejuje gospodarske svobode, ki je za industrijo nujno potrebna.
In attempting to comply with all those requirements equally and strike a balance between them, the vehicle industry all too often runs up against the limits of what is currently technically feasible.
Obremenitev s hrupom je predvsem lokalni problem, ki pa potrebuje rešitev na ravni celotne Unije.
Vehicle designers have repeatedly managed to push those limits back by using new, innovative materials and methods.
Prvi korak vsake trajnostne politike na področju emisij hrupa bi namreč moral biti oblikovanje ukrepov za zmanjšanje ravni hrupa pri viru.
Union law should set a clear framework for innovation that can be achieved in a realistic timeframe.
Glede na to, da se ta uredba osredotoča na vir hrupa, ki ga predstavljajo motorna vozila in ker je hrup sam po sebi premičen, zgolj nacionalni ukrepi ne zadostujejo.
This Regulation establishes such a framework and thus provides an immediate incentive for innovation in keeping with the needs of society, whilst in no way restricting the economic freedom that is vital to the industry.
Zagotavljanje informacij o emisijah hrupa potrošnikom in javnim organom lahko vpliva na odločitve o nakupu ter pospeši prehod na tišji vozni park.
Noise pollution is primarily a local problem, but one which calls for a Union-wide solution.
Zato bi morali proizvajalci zagotoviti informacije o ravni hrupa vozil ob nakupu in v tehničnem promocijskem gradivu.
The first step in any sustainable noise emissions policy should be to devise measures to reduce sound levels at source.
Oznaka, primerljiva z oznakami, ki dajejo informacije o emisijah CO2, porabi goriva in hrupu pnevmatik, bi morala potrošnike obveščati o emisijah hrupa vozila.
Since the target of this Regulation is the noise source that motor vehicles represent, and given that that noise source is by definition a mobile one, national measures alone are not sufficient.
Komisija bi morala opraviti oceno učinka v zvezi s pogoji označevanja, ki se uporabljajo za ravni onesnaženosti zraka in obremenitve s hrupom, in obveščanjem potrošnikov.
The provision of information on sound emissions to consumers and public authorities has the potential to influence purchasing decisions and accelerate the transition to a quieter vehicle fleet.
Pri tej oceni učinka bi morali upoštevati različne vrste vozil, zajete v tej uredbi (vključno z izključno električnimi vozili), in učinek, ki bi ga takšno označevanje lahko imelo na avtomobilsko industrijo.
Accordingly, manufacturers should provide information on sound levels of vehicles at the point of sale and in technical promotional material.
Za zmanjšanje hrupa cestnega prometa bi bilo treba javnim organom omogočiti, da sprejmejo ukrepe in spodbude za uporabo tišjih vozil.
A label, comparable to the labels used for information on CO2 emissions, fuel-consumption and tyre-noise, should inform consumers about the sound emissions of a vehicle.
Okoljske koristi hibridnih električnih in izključno električnih vozil se kažejo v obliki znatno zmanjšanega hrupa, ki ga oddajajo taka vozila.
The Commission should undertake an impact assessment on the labelling conditions applicable to air and noise pollution levels and on consumer information.
Zaradi tega zmanjšanja ni več pomembnega vira zvočnega signala, ki slepe in slabovidne pešce in kolesarje ter druge uporabnike cest opozarja na približevanje, bližino ali oddaljevanje takega vozila.
That impact assessment should take into account the different types of vehicles covered by this Regulation (including pure electric vehicles) as well as the effect that such labelling could have on the vehicle industry.
Posledično industrija razvija sisteme vozila za zvočno opozarjanje (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sistemi AVAS), ki bodo nadomestili to pomanjkanje zvoka pri hibridnih električnih in izključno električnih vozilih.
In order to reduce road traffic noise, public authorities should be able to put in place measures and incentives to encourage the use of quieter vehicles.
Delovanje takšnih sistemov AVAS, vgrajenih v vozila, bi moralo biti harmonizirano.
Environmental benefits from hybrid electric and pure electric vehicles have resulted in a substantial reduction of the noise emitted by such vehicles.
Pri razvoju sistemov AVAS bi bilo treba upoštevati vpliv hrupa na skupnost.
That reduction has removed an important source of an audible signal that is relied upon by blind and visually impaired pedestrians and cyclists, amongst other road users, to become aware of the approach, presence or departure of those vehicles.
Komisija bi morala preučiti potencial aktivnih varnostnih sistemov v bolj tihih vozilih, kot so hibridna električna in izključno električna vozila, za boljše izpolnjevanje cilja izboljšanja varnosti izpostavljenih udeležencev v cestnem prometu na mestnih območjih, kot so slepi, slabovidni in slušno prizadeti pešci, kolesarji in otroci.
As a consequence, industry is developing Acoustic Vehicle Alerting Systems (AVAS) to compensate for this lack of audible signal in hybrid electric and pure electric vehicles.
Ravni hrupa vozil imajo neposreden vpliv na kakovost življenja državljanov Unije, še posebej v mestnih območjih, kjer je malo storitev električnega ali podzemnega javnega prevoza ali infrastrukture za kolesarje ali pešce oziroma jih sploh ni.
The performance of such AVAS fitted to vehicles should be harmonised.
Upoštevati bi bilo treba tudi cilj podvojitve števila uporabnikov javnega prevoza, ki ga je določil Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 15. decembra 2011 o načrtu za enotni evropski prometni prostor – na poti h konkurenčnemu in z viri gospodarnemu prometnemu sistemu [12].
In developing of those AVAS consideration should be given to the overall impact on noise in communities.
Komisija in države članice bi morale v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti spodbujati javni prevoz, hojo in kolesarjenje za zmanjšanje obremenitve s hrupom v mestnih območjih.
The Commission should examine the potential of active safety systems in more silent vehicles such as hybrid electric and pure electric vehicles in order to better serve the objective of improving the safety of vulnerable road users in urban areas, such as blind, visually impaired and aurally challenged pedestrians, cyclists and children.
Raven hrupa vozila je deloma odvisna od načina njegove uporabe in kakovosti njegovega vzdrževanja po nakupu.
Vehicle sound levels have a direct impact on the quality of life of Union citizens, in particular in urban areas in which there is little or no electric or underground public transport provision or cycling or walking infrastructure.
Zato bi bilo treba javnost v Uniji bolje ozavestiti o pomenu umirjenega načina vožnje in upoštevanja hitrostnih omejitev, ki so v veljavi v posameznih državah članicah.