natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Some interested parties argued that the extension of the scope of the investigation to products ‘consigned from’ the PRC was unjustified, while the case was initiated only against products originating in the PRC.
Nekatere zainteresirane strani so trdile, da razširitev obsega preiskave na izdelke „ki so od tam poslani“ (iz LRK), medtem ko je bil postopek uveden samo zoper izdelke s poreklom iz LRK, ni bila utemeljena.
However, goods consigned from the PRC were already covered at the initiation stage.
Vendar pa je bilo blago, poslano iz LRK, zajeto že v začetni fazi.
In point 5 of the Notice of Initiation it is stated that ‘companies which ship the product concerned from the People's Republic of China but consider that part or even all of those exports do not have their customs origin in the People's Republic of China are invited to come forward in the investigation and to furnish all relevant information’.
V točki 5 obvestila o začetku je navedeno, da „so družbe, ki dobavljajo zadevni izdelek iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, a so mnenja, da del ali celo celoten izvoz po carinskem poreklu ne izvira iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, pozvane, da se javijo v preiskavi in predložijo ustrezne informacije“.
It is therefore clear that all companies consigning goods from the PRC had the opportunity to co-operate in this investigation.
Zato je jasno, da so imele vse družbe, ki pošiljajo blago iz LRK, možnost sodelovati v tej preiskavi.
It is therefore considered that all affected economic operators were duly informed of the possibility that special provisions in respect of goods consigned from the PRC may be adopted, if appropriate, and were invited to co-operate in the investigation.
Zato se šteje, da so bili vsi prizadeti gospodarski subjekti ustrezno obveščeni o možnosti, da se, če je to primerno, sprejmejo posebne določbe za blago, ki se pošilja iz LRK, in da so bili pozvani k sodelovanju v preiskavi.
Following disclosure, interested parties argued that irrespective of the provisions in the Notice of Initiation referred to in recital (91), the investigation was limited to goods originating in the PRC and did not assess the impact of goods consigned from the PRC.
Po razkritju so zainteresirane strani trdile, da je bila preiskava ne glede na določbe iz obvestila o začetku iz uvodne izjave (91) omejena na blago s poreklom iz LRK in ni ocenjevala vpliva blaga, poslanega iz LRK.
On the basis of this information, which contained all exports to the EU irrespective of the origin of the goods, a representative sample was selected.
Na podlagi teh informacij, ki so vsebovale vse izvoze v EU, ne glede na poreklo blaga, je bil izbran reprezentativni vzorec.
On this basis, it is concluded that the investigation covered all goods originating in or consigned from the PRC, and that the findings of the investigation, including subsidization and injury, cover all goods originating in or consigned from the PRC.
Na podlagi tega se sklene, da je preiskava zajela vse blago s poreklom iz LRK ali ki je od tam poslano, in da ugotovitve preiskave, vključno s subvencioniranjem in škodo, zajemajo vse blago s poreklom iz LRK ali ki je od tam poslano.
Furthermore, no exporting producers in third countries came forward raising the issue that the products they export are subject to the measures.
Prav tako noben proizvajalec izvoznik ni javil, da bili izdelki, ki jih izvažajo, predmet ukrepov.
The same exporting producers argued that exporting producers in third countries were not asked to come forward, and not given the opportunity to show that their products are not subsidised.
Isti proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili, da proizvajalci iz tretjih držav niso bili pozvani, naj se javijo in niso imeli priložnosti pokazati, da njihovi izdelki niso subvencionirani.
In view of the above, the product scope is definitively defined as crystalline silicon PV modules or panels and cells of the type used in crystalline silicon PV modules or panels, originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China, unless they are in transit in the sense of Article V GATT.
Glede na navedeno se obseg izdelka dokončno opredeli kot fotonapetostni moduli ali paneli iz kristalnega silicija ter celice, ki se uporabljajo v fotonapetostnih modulih ali panelih iz kristalnega silicija, s poreklom iz LRK ali ki so od tam poslani, razen če so v tranzitu v smislu člena V GATT.
The cells have a thickness not exceeding 400 micrometers.
Celice so debeline največ 400 mikrometrov.
The complainant alleged that the PRC is heavily subsidising its photovoltaic industry (‘PV industry’) and referred to a number of policy and planning documents as well as legislation which are the basis for the state support in the sector.
Pritožnik je trdil, da LRK močno subvencionira svojo fotonapetostno industrijo, in je navedel številne dokumente politike in načrtovanja ter zakonodajo, ki so podlaga za državno podporo v tem sektorju.
The Commission reviewed and analysed the documents mentioned in the complaint as well as additional documents submitted by the GOC and sampled exporting producers in the course of the investigation and found that many of them indeed show that the PV industry in the PRC receives preferential treatment in many areas.
Komisija je pregledala in proučila dokumente, navedene v pritožbi, ter dodatne dokumente, ki so jih predložili kitajska vlada in vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki med potekom preiskave, ter ugotovila, da več dokumentov dejansko kaže, da se fotonapetostna industrija v LRK na številnih področjih obravnava preferenčno.
The GOC included the PV industry amongst ‘strategic’ industries in the 12th Five-year Plan [12].
Kitajska vlada je fotonapetostno industrijo v 12. petletnem načrtu vključila med „strateške“ industrije [12].
The GOC has also issued a specific plan for the solar photovoltaic industry (subordinate to the main 12 th Five-year Plan), i.e. The 12th Five-year Plan for the Solar Photovoltaic Industry.
Kitajska vlada je izdala tudi poseben načrt za solarno fotonapetostno industrijo (podrejen glavnemu 12. petletnemu načrtu), tj. 12. petletni načrt za fotonapetostno industrijo.
In this plan the GOC expressed its support for ‘superior enterprises’ [13] and ‘key enterprises’ [14], committed itself to ‘promote the implementation of various photovoltaic support policies’ [15], and ‘formulate overall preparation of supporting policies on industry, finance, taxation …’ [16].
V tem načrtu je kitajska vlada izrazila svojo podporo za „nadrejena podjetja“ [13] in „ključna podjetja“ [14] ter se zavezala, da bo „spodbujala izvajanje različnih politik podpore fotonapetostni industriji“ [15] in „oblikovala splošno pripravo podpornih politik za industrijo, finance, področje davkov…“ [16].
The Decision No 40 of the State Council suggests that the GOC will actively support the development of new energy industry and expedite the development of solar energy [17], instructs all financial institutions to provide credit support only to encouraged projects (the category in which the PV projects belong) and promises the implementation of ‘other preferential policies on the encouraged projects’ [18].
Sklep št. 40 državnega sveta navaja, da bo kitajska vlada dejavno podpirala razvoj nove energetske industrije in pospešila razvoj sončne energije [17], naroča vsem finančnim institucijam, naj zagotovijo kreditno podporo samo za spodbujane projekte (kategorija, v katero sodijo fotonapetostni projekti), ter obeta izvajanje „drugih politik ugodnosti za spodbujane projekte“ [18].
Another State Council Decision of 10 October 2010 talks about expansion of the ‘intensity of fiscal and financial policy support’, encourages the financial institutions to ‘expand the credit support’ and promises to ‘make use of the fiscal preferential policies such as risk compensation’ [19] for new strategic industries, a category where the solar PV industry belongs.
Drugi sklep državnega sveta z dne 10. oktobra 2010 navaja razširitev „intenzivnosti podpore davčne in finančne politike“, spodbuja finančne institucije k „razširitvi kreditne podpore“ in napoveduje, da se bodo „izkoristile davčne preferenčne politike, kot je nadomestilo za tveganje“ [19] za nove strateške industrije, tj. kategorijo, v katero sodi solarna fotonapetostna industrija.
The National Outline for the Medium and Long-term Science and Technology Development (2006-2020) promises to ‘give the first place to policy finance’, ‘encourage financial institutions to grant preferential credit support to major national scientific and technological industrialisation projects’, to ‘Encourage financial institutions to improve and strengthen financial services to high-tech enterprises’ and to ‘implement the preferential tax policies to promote the development of high-tech enterprises’ [20].
Nacionalni okvir za srednjeročne in dolgoročne znanosti in tehnološki razvoj (obdobje 2006–2020) napoveduje, da bo „na prvo mesto postavil finance politike“, „spodbujal finančne institucije k dodeljevanju preferenčne kreditne podpore velikim nacionalnim projektom znanstvene in tehnološke industrializacije“, „spodbujal finančne institucije k izboljšanju in krepitvi finančnih storitev za visokotehnološke družbe“ in „izvajal preferenčne davčne politike za spodbujanje razvoja visokotehnoloških družb“ [20].
Also the Law of the PRC on Scientific and Technological Progress lists a number of measures for the support of strategic industries including the solar PV industry.
Tudi zakon LRK o znanstvenem in tehnološkem napredku navaja seznam ukrepov za podporo strateškim industrijam, vključno s solarno fotonapetostno industrijo.
Inter alia, it shows that the state shall encourage and give guidance to financial institutions in supporting the development of high and new technology industries by granting loans [21], instructs the policy oriented financial institutions to give priority to the development of high and new technology industries in offering financial services [22], provides for ‘discount interest and guaranty to the loans’ received by certain enterprises and ‘special aid’ by the policy oriented financial institutions to projects encouraged by state [23].
Med drugim je iz njega razvidno, da država spodbuja in usmerja finančne institucije pri podpiranju razvoja visokotehnoloških industrij in industrij z novo tehnologijo z odobritvami posojil [21], naroča politično usmerjenim finančnim institucijam, naj pri zagotavljanju finančnih storitev dajo prednost razvoju visokotehnoloških industrij in industrij z novo tehnologijo [22], ter zagotavlja „diskontno obrestno mero in jamstvo za posojila“, ki jih prejmejo nekatera podjetja, in „posebno pomoč“ s strani politično usmerjenih finančnih institucij projektom, ki jih spodbuja država [23].
The practical applications of these measures are detailed below.
Praktična uporaba teh ukrepov je prikazana spodaj.
Both the GOC and the sampled Chinese exporting producers submitted questionnaire replies and accepted on-spot visits [24] in order to verify the replies.
Kitajska vlada in vzorčeni kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki so predložili izpolnjene vprašalnike in privolili v obiske na kraju samem [24], da bi se preverili odgovori.
With respect to the GOC, following the analysis of the questionnaire reply, the Commission sent a deficiency letter and a pre-verification letter, followed up with subsequent correspondence concerning the agenda of the verification visit.
V zvezi s kitajsko vlado je Komisija po analizi izpolnjenih vprašalnikov poslala poziv k dopolnitvi in predpreveritveno pismo, čemur so sledili nadaljnji dopisi v zvezi s časovnim okvirom preveritvenega obiska.
Indeed, a substantial deadline extension was granted to the GOC, i.e. 30 days extension for the reply to the questionnaire which resulted in an eventual deadline of 69 days for the submission of the questionnaire reply and the Commission gave the GOC 25 days for the reply to the deficiency letter.
Dejansko je bilo kitajski vladi odobreno precejšnje podaljšanje roka, tj. 30 dodatnih dni za izpolnitev vprašalnika, kar je pomenilo skupaj 69-dnevni rok za predložitev izpolnjenega vprašalnika, pri čemer je Komisija kitajski vladi dala na voljo 25 dni za odgovor na poziv k dopolnitvi.
Therefore, overall, the GOC has had more than three months to provide the requested information requested by the Commission.
Kitajska vlada je imela skupaj več kot tri mesece časa, da zagotovi potrebne informacije, ki jih je zahtevala Komisija.
During the on-spot verification visit to the Chinese Ministry of Commerce in Beijing and four financial institutions (China Development Bank, Export Import Bank of China, Huaxia Bank and SINOSURE) the Commission endeavoured to verify information provided on the basis of the supporting documents that were used to prepare the GOC's response, in line with the provisions of Articles 11 and 26 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija si je med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem kitajskega ministrstva za gospodarstvo v Pekingu in štirih finančnih institucij (Kitajska razvojna banka, Kitajska izvozno-uvozna banka, banka Huaxia in družba Sinosure) prizadevala preveriti informacije, predložene na podlagi podporne dokumentacije, ki je bila uporabljena za pripravo odgovora kitajske vlade, v skladu z določbami členov 11 in 26 osnovne uredbe.
In doing so, the Commission came preliminarily to the conclusion that the lack of information and supporting documents available from the GOC did not allow a proper verification of the reply to the questionnaire.
Pri tem je Komisija predhodno ugotovila, da zaradi pomanjkanja informacij in podporne dokumentacije, ki jih je dala na voljo kitajska vlada, ni mogoče ustrezno preveriti izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
The GOC also submitted that the Commission was imposing an unreasonable burden on the GOC and that it had requested irrelevant and unnecessary information in the questionnaire and subsequent deficiency letter.
Kitajska vlada je navedla tudi, da ji je Komisija naložila nerazumno dokazno breme ter v vprašalniku in poznejšemu pozivu k dopolnitvi zahtevala nepomembne in nepotrebne informacije.
With respect to the requested information it is noted that the Commission requested only information concerning allegations in the complaint that is deemed necessary for the purposes of arriving at a representative finding and remained consistent in its requests by asking for the same data and information during the investigating process and requesting the GOC to explain the submitted information and its implication for the investigated schemes.
V zvezi z zahtevanimi informacijami je ugotovljeno, da je Komisija zahtevala samo informacije v zvezi s trditvami iz pritožbe, za katere je menila, da so potrebne za reprezentativno ugotovitev, in je bila v svojih zahtevah dosledna, saj je med postopkom preiskave želela iste podatke in informacije, ter zahtevala od kitajske vlade, naj pojasni predložene informacije in njihov vpliv na preiskovane sheme.
In other words, the Commission only requested information that was necessary to assess the existence and level of subsidisation available to the product concerned pursuant to the subsidy schemes alleged in the complaint.
Komisija je torej zahtevala le informacije, nujne za oceno obstoja in ravni subvencioniranja, ki je na voljo za zadevni izdelek v skladu z drugimi subvencijskimi shemami, domnevanimi v pritožbi.
As already referred to in recital (105) above, following the on spot verification visits, on 23 May 2013, the Commission notified the GOC that it was considering the application of facts available in accordance with Article 28 of the basic Regulation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (105), je Komisija po preveritvenih obiskih na kraju samem, in sicer 23. maja 2013, uradno obvestila kitajsko vlado, da proučuje možnost uporabe razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 28 osnovne uredbe.
The Commission sent this letter, since it had come to the preliminary conclusion that the lack of information and supporting evidence available from the GOC did not allow for a proper verification of the reply to the anti-subsidy questionnaire, deficiency letter and other submissions made by the GOC in the course of the proceeding at hand.
Komisija je poslala ta dopis, ker je predhodno ugotovila, da zaradi pomanjkanja informacij in na podlagi podpornih dokazov, ki jih je dala na voljo kitajska vlada, ni bilo mogoče ustrezno preveriti izpolnjenega protidampinškega vprašalnika, odgovorov na poziv k dopolnitvi in drugih stališč kitajske vlade v obravnavanem postopku.
Moreover, it was found on spot that certain information was also withheld in the questionnaire reply and subsequent submissions by the GOC, although it had been specifically requested by the Commission.
Poleg tega je bilo na kraju samem ugotovljeno, da nekatere informacije v izpolnjenem vprašalniku in o nadaljnjih stališčih kitajske vlade niso bile predložene, čeprav jih je Komisija izrecno zahtevala.
In addition certain questions were simply not replied to.
Poleg tega na določena vprašanja sploh ni bilo odgovorjeno.
The potential application of facts available concerned the government plans, projects, various legislation and other documents; Preferential policy loans, other financing, guarantees and insurance; PBOC circulars; verifications at banks; Export credit insurance and Sinosure verification; the Golden Sun Demonstration programme; direct tax exemption and reduction programmes; indirect tax and import tariff programmes; provision of inputs at less than adequate remuneration: polysilicon, aluminium extrusions and glass; and the provision of Land Use Rights.
Morebitna uporaba razpoložljivih dejstev je zadevala vladne načrte, projekte, različno zakonodajo in drugo dokumentacijo; preferenčna posojila politike, drugo financiranje, jamstva in zavarovanje; okrožnice Ljudske banke Kitajske (angleško PBOC), preveritve na bankah, zavarovanja izvoznih kreditov in preveritev družbe Sinosure; demonstracijski program Golden Sun; programe neposrednih davčnih oprostitev in znižanja davka; programe posrednih davkov in uvoznih dajatev; zagotavljanje sestavin za manj kot ustrezno nadomestilo: polisilicij, izdelke in polizdelke iz aluminija ter steklo; in zagotavljanje pravic do uporabe zemljišča.
In its letter of 3 June 2013 the GOC objected the Commission's preliminary intention to apply the provisions of Article 28 of the basic Regulation, reasoning that the conditions required to disregard the information submitted or even to ‘fill in information gaps’ had not been met in this case.
Kitajska vlada je v svojem dopisu z dne 3. junija 2013 nasprotovala predhodnemu namenu Komisije, da bo uporabila določbe člena 28 osnovne uredbe, ker naj v tem primeru ne bi bili izpolnjeni zahtevani pogoji, da se ne upoštevajo predložene informacije ali celo da se „zapolnijo informacijske vrzeli“.
The GOC claimed that ‘doubts’ as to the accuracy of information, which arise solely from the fact that information submitted could not be verified to the Commission's ‘utmost’ satisfaction, should not lead to that information being disregarded.
Kitajska vlada je trdila, da se zaradi „pomislekov“ o točnosti predloženih informacij, ki se pojavijo zgolj zaradi dejstva, da jih ni bilo mogoče preveriti v taki meri, da bi bila Komisija „izredno“ zadovoljna, takih informacij ne sme zanemariti.
The Commission disagrees with this claim as it does not represent the reality.
Komisija se ne strinja s to zahtevo, saj ne predstavlja dejanskega stanja.
Indeed, the Commission did not ‘disregard’ any of the information solely on the basis that it could not verify it during the on-the-spot verification visit.
Komisija pravzaprav ni „zanemarila“ nobenih informacij zgolj zato, ker jih ni mogla preveriti med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem.
However, if the information and explanation provided by the GOC was found to be either contradictory and/or incomplete when compared to the other information available to the Commission and, at the same time it was not possible to verify it during the on spot verification visit, the Commission could not take such information at its face value.
Vendar če se je za informacije in razlago, ki jih je predložila kitajska vlada, ugotovilo, da so bodisi nasprotujoče in/ali nepopolne v primerjavi z ostalimi informacijami, dostopnimi Komisiji, in jih hkrati ni bilo mogoče preveriti med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem, Komisija teh informacij v njihovi sedanji obliki ni mogla upoštevati.
Due weight is attached to each piece of information depending on the degree of non-cooperation from the GOC.
Vsaka informacija se ustrezno upošteva glede na stopnjo nesodelovanja kitajske vlade.
It is also noted that the Commission did not take an issue with the format in which the information was provided, as the GOC alleged, but rather with its inaccuracy and/or incompleteness.
Opozoriti je treba tudi, da Komisija ni imela pomislekov glede oblike, v kateri so bile informacije predložene, kot je trdila kitajska vlada, temveč glede njihove netočnosti in/ali nepopolnosti.
The GOC also claimed that some of the information requested by the Commission involved such a burden that the GOC did not have the practical ability to provide it.
Kitajska vlada je trdila tudi, da so nekatere informacije, ki jih je zahtevala Komisija, vključevale tako breme, da jih dejansko ni bila zmožna zagotoviti.
In this respect it is noted that the Commission requested only information which was necessary to verify the allegations made by the complainant (and supported by prima facie evidence) and gave the GOC ample time and opportunity to submit such information.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je Komisija zahtevala le informacije, ki so bile potrebne za preverjanje trditev pritožnika (in podprte z dokazi prima facie), in je kitajski vladi zagotovila dovolj časa in možnosti za predložitev takih informacij.
In addition, the Commission is fully aware that the significant number of detailed allegations of the complainant in this case obliged it to request a substantial amount of information from the GOC.
Poleg tega se Komisija popolnoma zaveda, da je bila zaradi velikega števila podrobnih trditev pritožnika v tej zadevi obvezana, da od kitajske vlade zahteva precejšnjo količino informacij.
However, as explained above (recitals (104) to (107)), the information sought was not excessive and due time was allowed for it to be provided.
Vendar, kot bilo pojasnjeno (uvodne izjave od (104) do (107)), količina zahtevanih informacij ni bila prekomerna, za njihovo predložitev pa je bilo na voljo dovolj časa.
Further the GOC pointed to the distinction between disregarding the submitted information and supplementing the information received with facts actually on records.
Nadalje je kitajska vlada poudarila, da je med neupoštevanjem predloženih informacij in dopolnjevanjem prejetih informacij z dejansko evidentiranimi dejstvi razlika.
While the Commission is fully aware of this distinction and acts in line with the relevant provisions of Article 28 of the basic Regulation it must point out that when the submitted information is in contradiction with other information available on the same matter to the Commission it is not possible to supplement this information.
Komisija se popolnoma zaveda tega razlikovanja in deluje v skladu z ustreznimi določbami člena 28 osnovne uredbe, vendar mora opozoriti, da kadar so predložene informacije v nasprotju z drugimi informacijami, ki so ji na razpolago o isti zadevi, teh ni mogoče dopolniti.
On such occasions (e.g. submitted information on the ownership of banks) the Commission had to decide which information is more reliable.
V takih primerih (npr. predložene informacije o lastništvu bank) se je Komisija morala odločiti, katere informacije so bolj zanesljive.
In doing so the Commission ensured that the use of facts available is not punitive and is based on facts actually available.
Pri tem je zagotovila, da uporaba razpoložljivih dejstev ni kaznovalna in temelji na dejstvih, ki so dejansko na voljo.